alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.98 CWT 0.965 $5.7707

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4777 LB 3.5 $8.6720

Class I Price $14.4427

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.82 CWT 0.965 $5.6163

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4251 LB 3.5 $8.4879

Class I Price $14.1042

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.3385

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0291

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0146

Price change per quart $0.0073

Price change per pint $0.0036

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0026

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0022

Price change per half pint $0.0018

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: May 6, 2018
EPA Deputy Administrator Meeting with Small Businesses and Small Business 

Trade Associations

On April 21, 2011, Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director, Office of Chemical Safety and 

Pollution Prevention and other EPA representatives, met with representatives from the Office of 

Small Business Programs and the Small Business Trade Associations to hear comments 

regarding the Proposed Inventory Update Reporting Modifications rule. Specifically, SBTA was 

interested in EPA’s interpretation of reportability of byproducts under the IUR proposed rule and 

its impacts on small businesses.

The list of attendees is included in the attachment.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00319

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 188,463

- C
Before Meier, Gabriel, and Kerr, JJ. Per Cu riam Memorandum Opinion 

### T OMMIE 

### D ENSON 

### , Appellant

V



### . C APT 

### N. S MITH AND 

### C.O. A NGELLO 

### S CHILLINGFORD 

### , Appell ees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 11, 2018, we notified Appellant Tommie Denson of our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. The trial court’s judgment was signed on August 13, 2018, and no postjudgment motion was filed to extend the appellate deadline, so the notice of appeal was due September 12, 2018, but was not filed until October 4, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. And because Denson ’s handwritten notice of appeal i s dated September 27, 2018 , we further asked him to advise us whether he properly addressed, stamped, and delivered the notice of appeal to the prison mailbox for mailing to the trial court clerk on or before the last day for filing a mot ion to ext end
the time to file the notice of appeal

— September 27, 2018

— and if so, to provide us with a reasonable explanation for the late filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3 , 10.5(b)(2)(A)

. We have received no response. The filing of a notice of appeal i nvo ke s jurisdiction in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or timely filed motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 199 7 ). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f)

. Per Curiam
Delivered: November 2 9 , 2018
No. 10-11004.

#### Moises Baranda-Cuevas, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1058, 132 S. Ct. 755,

181 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8593.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*482Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 177.
No. 10-11137.

#### Otis Parkes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 497,

181 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7823.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 10-10487.

#### Brian McClendon, Petitioner v. Dave Rednour, Warden.

565 U.S. 962, 132 S. Ct. 452,

181 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7580.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-6906.

#### Marco Dewayne Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 598,

181 L. Ed. 2d 438,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8182.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 413.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50206

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-664-1

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar GonzalezGonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.57 CWT 0.965 $5.3751

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.3789 LB 3.5 $8.3262

Class I Price $13.7012

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.31 CWT 0.965 $5.1242

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.2908 LB 3.5 $8.0178

Class I Price $13.1420

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.5593

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0481

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0240

Price change per quart $0.0120

Price change per pint $0.0060

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0043

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0036

Price change per half pint $0.0030

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.05

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: July 3, 2016
≥95% (26 grantees)

67%-94% (18 grantees)

34%-66% (9 grantees)

≤33% (1 grantee)

No data/No IIS (2 grantees)

Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2012

National Participation: 86% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2012 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
No. 11-6856.

#### Daniel Watlington, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,

181 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8097.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 279.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/19/2015 COA No. 01-14-00434-CR

GONZALEZ, ALEX Tr. Ct. No. 1368857 PD-0741-15

The Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The

Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3)

days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

1ST COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

301 FANNIN

HOUSTON, TX 77002-7006

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CEO and CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the annual report of the Intrepid (Company)
  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Commission
  on the date hereof, Wilson W. (Bill) Hendricks III, Chief Executive officer
  and Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) This 10-KSB complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

(2) The financial information contained in this Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Wilson W. (Bill) Hendricks IIIBy: Wilson W.
(Bill) Hendricks III, Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Wilson W. (Bill) Hendricks IIIBy: Wilson W.
(Bill) Hendricks III, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

November 19, 2007 The signed original of this written statement
required by section 906 has been provided to Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc.,
and will be retained by Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc and furnished to the SEC
upon request.

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Stephanie Lavon Word a/k/a * From the 104th District Court

Stephanie Payne a/k/a of Taylor County,

Stephanie Word, Trial Court No. 18770B.

Vs. No. 11-14-00292-CR * September 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Final - August 20, 2020

PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s)

10:00 Welcome & Introductions Dr. José Romero (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Amanda Cohn (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

10:30 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines

Introduction

mRNA-1273 Clinical Development 

Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine Clinical Development 

Dr. Beth Bell (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Jacqueline M. Miller (Moderna)

Dr. Nicholas Kitchin (Pfizer/BioNtech)

12:00

12:30 Overview of post-marketing safety surveillance 

Epidemiology of individuals at increased risk of COVID-19 disease

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC/NCEZID)

Dr. Nancy McClung (CDC/NCIRD)

1:40

1:50 Modeling allocation strategies for the initial COVID-19 vaccine supply 

Work Group interpretation 

Prioritization and Work Group next steps

Dr. Rachel Slayton (CDC/NCEZID)

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Kathleen Dooling (CDC/NCIRD)

3:00

3:15

4:00

Acronyms

CDC

COVID-19

EtR

GRADE

mRNA

NCHHSTP

NCIRD

NCEZID

SAGE

SARS-CoV-2

WG

WHO

VE

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

August 26, 2020

AGENDA ITEM

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Lunch

Messenger ribonucleuc acid

Evidence to Recommendations Framework

Coronavirus disease 2019

Break

Public Comment

Adjourn

Break

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/OID]

Work Group

World Health Organization

Vaccine Effectiveness

Strategic Advisory Group of Experts

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

page 1 of 1
No. 11-6461.

#### In re William DiGianni, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1056, 132 S. Ct. 767,

181 L. Ed. 2d 510,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8312.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
*August 3, 1999 DRAFT*

DoD 4000.25-7-M

DLM 4000.25, Volume 6, June 5, 2012

# APPENDIX 2.1

# DOCUMENT IDENTIFIER CODES

**AP**

AP2.1-1

APPENDIX 2.1
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 22-01 STANDARD 81.78 2.23 -10.29

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 4, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature 50/50 POLYESTER/COTTON FLEECE A-A-55276

Shade Number ASH GRAY 1165 Piece/Roll Number 22-01
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 32

 To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public donations to 
  fund the construction of a barrier on the border between the United 
               States and Mexico and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Davidson of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Hice of 
    Georgia, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Norman, Mr. Mooney of West 
 Virginia, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Cloud, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. 
  Biggs, Mr. Perry, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Massie, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Buck) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public donations to 
  fund the construction of a barrier on the border between the United 
               States and Mexico and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buy a Brick, Build the Wall Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. BORDER WALL TRUST FUND.

    (a) Border Wall Trust Fund.--At the end of subchapter III of 
chapter 33 of title 31, United States Code, insert the following:
``Sec. 3344. Border wall trust fund.
    ``(a) Authority To Receive Gifts.--Notwithstanding section 3113, 
the Secretary of the Treasury may accept for the Government a gift of 
money on the condition that it be used to plan, design, construct, or 
maintain a barrier along the international border between the United 
States and Mexico.
    ``(b) Trust Fund.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            ``(1) establish an account, to be known as the `Border Wall 
        Trust Fund', into which money received as gifts under this 
        section shall be deposited; and
            ``(2) create a publicly accessible website to receive such 
        gifts.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for chapter 33 of 
title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the 
following:

``3344. Border wall trust fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Endangered Species Permit

    The following applicants have applied for permits to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.):

PRT-844812

Applicant: Paul M. Richards, University of Miami, Coral Gables, 
Florida

    The applicant requests authorization to take (capture, radio-tag, 
and track) the endangered American crocodile, Crocodylus acutus, 
throughout the species range in Florida, for the purpose of enhancement 
of survival of the species.

PRT-844786

    Applicant: Kenneth H. Jones, Dyersburg State Community College, 
Dyersburg, Tennessee

    The applicant requests authorization to take (harass by observation 
and placement of instruments at nests) the endangered least tern, 
Sterna antillarum, throughout the species range in Tennessee, for the 
purpose of enhancement of survival of the species.
    Written data or comments on these applications should be submitted 
to: Regional Permit Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345. All data and 
comments must be received by August 27, 1998.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 
(Attn: David Dell, Permit Biologist). Telephone: 404/679-7313; Fax: 
404/679-7081.

    Dated: June 21, 1998.
H. Dale Hall,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 98-20077 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 3, 2009 |  | /s/ L. Kevin Kelly     
|                      |  | L. Kevin Kelly         
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05818**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 05818\05818_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05818\05818_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 05818\05818_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05818\05818_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

05818\Certification Statement_05818.pdf Plant certification statement 05818\05818_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20322

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LESLIE NICOLE BREAUX, also known as Leslie Nicole Adams, also known 

as Leslie Nicole Adams-Breaux,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-277-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Leslie Nicole Breaux has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Breaux has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow 

us to make a fair evaluation of Breaux’s claims of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20322 Document: 00514950370 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2019
No. 18-20322

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Breaux’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-20322 Document: 00514950370 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2019
(logo)CWCapital 

ASSET MANAGEMENT 

 

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

 

 

**JPMCC 2017-JP7**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in§11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), inits capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate withrespect to the following:

 

(A)    A review of CWCAM’sactivities during the period noted above (the “Reporting Period”) and ofCWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

(B)    To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

/s/JamesP. Shevlin

 

JamesP. Shevlin

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
No. 11-6356.

#### Jai Devon Lee, Petitioner v. Stephen Upton, Warden.

565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 585,

181 L. Ed. 2d 430,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8279.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.