alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -** **2012 -**  **0601** Docket Number
**2008 -**  **SW -**  **033 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket B ell H elicopter T extron, I nc., Alert Service Bulletin No. 205 - 07 - 94, Revision A, dated December 8, 2008 B ell H elicopter T extron, I nc., Alert Service Bulletin No. 205B - 08 - 50, dated December 8, 2008


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Reg ional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7485

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TONY ALFORENZO WALKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-84; CA-98-1415-2) Submitted: June 28, 2004 Decided: July 30, 2004 Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Alforenzo Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tony Alforenzo Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider judgment. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). The denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is the final order in a habeas proceeding and thus requires a certificate of appealability for appeal. Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 367-69 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing because his Rule 60(b) motion was untimely filed. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-5420.

#### Oscar Art Stanley, Petitioner v. James G. Cox, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 906, 132 S. Ct. 308,

181 L. Ed. 2d 189,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5955.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5918.

#### Mitchell Craig Blocker, Petitioner v. Mike Martell, Warden.

565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 461,

181 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7524.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-77.

#### In re Jerry Lee Roth, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 394,

181 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6327.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

TAN 525 STANDARD 57.96 4.89 15.07

1 3949C BLUE-VIOLET 

LIMIT -1.34 -0.14 -1.77 1.40

OLIVE 527 STANDARD 49.74 -0.56 20.74

DARK 

GREEN

528

STANDARD 38.91 -4.59 13.41

BROWN 

529 STANDARD 37.52 5.62 12.62

2 3949A FULL GREEN 

LIMIT -1.46 -0.22 -1.02 1.14

3 3949D FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT -0.94 0.40 0.32 0.71

DARK 

CREAM

559

STANDARD 60.99 1.27 10.92

LIGHT 

SAGE

560

STANDARD 52.77 0.10 15.01

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3949

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT March 10, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, WIND RESISTANT, INSULATED 

AND FLAME RESISTANT, IWOL FOR FREE GL/PD 12-16D

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
4 3949B FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT -1.45 -0.13 -0.18 0.68

BARK 

BROWN

561

STANDARD 27.63 4.04 2.02

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG98-7-001]


Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Filing

July 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 13,1998, Midcoast Interstate Transmission, 
Inc. (Midcoast) filed standards of conduct in response to the 
Commission's June 12, 1998 order requiring Midcoast to revise its 
standards of conduct.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 83 FERC para. 61,296 (1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Midcoast states that it has served copies of its revised standards 
of conduct upon each person designated on the official service list 
compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Secs. 385.211 or 385.214). All such 
motions to intervene or protest should be filed on or before August 6, 
1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20065 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5417.

#### Frank M. Bafford, Petitioner v. Midfirst Bank, et al.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575,

181 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8173,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3490 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit certain unfair credit practices, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2019 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. SCHNEIDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit certain 

unfair credit practices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Lend5 ing Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OBLIGOR TRANSACTIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lend8 ing Act (15 U.S.C. 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3490 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 140B. UNFAIR CREDIT PRACTICES. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In connection with the extension 

3 of credit or creation of debt in or affecting commerce, as 

4 defined in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 44), including any advance of funds or sale 

6 or assignment of future income or receivables that may 

7 or may not be credit, no person may directly or indirectly 

8 take or receive from another person an obligation that con9 stitutes or contains a cognovit or confession of judgment 

10 (for purposes other than executory process in the State 

11 of Louisiana), warrant of attorney, or other waiver of the 

12 right to notice and the opportunity to be heard in the 

13 event of suit or process thereon. 

14 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTION.—The exemption in section 104(1) 

15 shall not apply to this section.’’. 

16 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

17 (1) Section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act 

18 (15 U.S.C. 1602) is amended by adding at the end 

19 the following: 

20 ‘‘(ff) The term ‘debt’ means any obligation of a per21 son to pay to another person money— 

22 ‘‘(1) regardless of whether the obligation is ab23 solute or contingent if the understanding between 

24 the parties is that any part of the money shall be 

25 or may be returned; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3490 IH

1 ‘‘(2) that includes the right of the person pro2 viding the money to an equitable remedy for breach 

3 of performance if the breach gives rise to a right to 

4 payment; and 

5 ‘‘(3) regardless of whether the obligation or 

6 right to an equitable remedy described in paragraph 

7 (2) has been reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, 

8 matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, 

9 or unsecured.’’. 

10 (2) Section 130(a) of the Truth in Lending Act 

11 (15 U.S.C. 1640) is amended by striking ‘‘creditor’’ 

12 each place the term appears and inserting ‘‘person’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Percentage of private provider sites participating in a grantee

immunization information system-- United States, six cities§, and eight Territories†, 2007

No Report

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%

Source: CY2007 IISAR

§Chicago, Illinois (0%-

33%); District of Columbia 

(95%–100%); Houston, 

Texas (0%–33%); New 

York City, New York 

(67%–94%); Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania (67%–94%); 

San Antonio, Texas (0%–

33%).

National Coverage: 48% (excluding Territories)

†American Samoa (No Report), 

Guam (No Report) , Marshall 

Islands (0%-33%), Federated 

States of Micronesia (0%-33%), 

N. Mariana Islands (No Report), 

Palau (No Report), Puerto Rico 

(0%-33%), Virgin Islands (No 

Report).
No. 11-399.

#### Reynaldo Sorcia, aka Reynaldo Sorcia-Rico, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1061, 132 S. Ct. 776,

181 L. Ed. 2d 487,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8660.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 117.
No. 11-82.

#### Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al., Appellants v. Haley Barbour, Governor of Mississippi, et al.

565 U.S. 972, 132 S. Ct. 542,

181 L. Ed. 2d 343,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7807.

October 31, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Judgment affirmed.
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Kevin J.Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 26, 2020 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
**
No. 11-7259.

#### John Thomas Bolen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 859,

181 L. Ed. 2d 559,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8928.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rule 212

212-1

RULE 212 ANNUAL RENEWAL

(Adopted 11/19/85; Revised 9/14/99)

A permit issued pursuant to these Rules is good for the calendar year for which it is 

issued. If the article, machine, Equipment or contrivance for which a permit is issued is 

to continue in use or operation, a new permit must be issued for each calendar year, or 

part thereof, during which said article is in operation.
No. 11-7112.

#### Kim Davis Beckstrom, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 827,

181 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8744.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 1012.
No. 11-6756.

#### Fabian Hernandez, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 564,

181 L. Ed. 2d 407,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8026.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Paul
Vanderslice, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and
all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CD 2017-CD5
Mortgage Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act
periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial
Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC;
Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; LNR Partners, LLC; and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:    March 29, 2018



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Vanderslice                                         
|Paul Vanderslice                                             
|President, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.     
|(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)



CD 2017-CD5 Mortgage Trust Sarbanes-Oxley Certification (2017)
April is...

While our efforts to eliminate sexual assault remain undeterred, in light of 

COVID-19, all DLA-wide events and group activities have been postponed.

Here's how we can still support SAAPM 2020 during this critical time:

• Wear Teal on Tuesdays

• Wear denim on National Denim Day - 29 April 2020

• Connect w/ your respective J/D Code or MSC SARC to talk about SAPR

services/resources.

• Visit the DLA SAPR website to learn more about the SAPR Program and

services/resources @ https://www.dla.mil/info/sapr

POC: Beth Cheek, SAPR PM 571-767-0467
FILED: July 7 , 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 4433

( 4:18

- cr

- 00821

- MGL

- 1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

– Appell ee

,

v.

QUINTIN LA PRIX DAVIS,

Defendant

– Appell ant

.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed Ju ly 7 , 2023, as follows:

On page 2, foot note 1, the references to “ § 924(g)(1) ” should be corrected to

“§ 922(g)(1).”

For the Court

– By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor , Clerk USCA4 Appeal: 20-4433 Doc: 79 Filed: 07/07/2023 Pg: 1 of 1
BRUSHWELLMAN
MATERIAL CERTIFICATION

Customer: Defense Logistics Agency, Defense National Stockpile Date: May 5, 1993
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway ' 8.0.4: EMGOO6
Suite 100, Crystal Square 4 P.O.#: DLA-300-90-C-0932
. Arlington, VA 22202 Specification: p.410A
Material Description: Rev. RI.
Item 3 ~ Lot No. 4875, One (1) Beryllium Billet, Grade A, Type I.
Gross Weight: 3533.0 tbs.
Net Weight: 3084.0 Ibs. ?

(WT. %) MECHANICAL PRORER TE:
Date Ss iin ia? Gee See Tf a
test | Direct aah (ksi) (ksi) “| a EL Vid /U1t,
s 799. Top:

. af 8 15/3/93 | Long. None 52.7 3.3 «64 Room
Fe 10 09 14/27/93 Long None 52.4 S34 3.6 66 Room
6 07 [1015/03/93 Trans.| None | 66 ~_ 33.9 64 | Room
Al 4 04 14/27/93 Trans None 55.9 34.3 -61 Room
Mg 203 01 14/27/93) Trans 11.1 8 10.7 13. 75 1200°
Si 03 203 Bot: en
Mn < .01 | < 10315703793) Long Hone 54,2 34.9% 3.4 «64 Room
Cr s .01 | < .02 14/22/93] Long None 54.1 29 Yo 0 «64 Roon

Ni < 01 0115/03/93 Trans,| Nhe 56.8 3.1 64 Room

Ti*~—~/< 01 01 |4/22/93| Trans $7.2 5 5.5 «61 Room

tu < 01 | < .01/4/22799 Tra Noni 15. b, WZ 9.6 +79 1200°

RY Ol | < .01 »

_u o1 [<0 fi,
ro
ae}
DENst Gyo: we GRAIN SIZE: (Microns)
*. Avg. Max.
00 %,Theoretical Top 10.5 L.6
4 9.7 :
fe = JOGRARHIC.INSR.-.BER, Sevres E A at
PI10A, Ri | PLIOA, Ri and MIL-STD=6866
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Batch . Ultrasonic inspection per P110A, RL.
Spot
on ae Xray we. tour, \ Kw | nee
Others & Mayg'Gs | DEW/ DUS Zz.
This is to certify that the above material satisfies the requirements of Specification see above 1

See _above and was removed from Pressing No, __4875

BRUSH WELLMAN INC.
QUALITY CONTROL R. P. Garner

Drawing Purchase Order

BW—115 1/01 ce:
Shipping (3) Sales (1) Fite (1)
Date of Posting...................

Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Item #

(K0000) Location Origin

# of 

Units Bulk Wt (lbs) WO3 (%)

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates Offering

FISCAL YEAR 2023

Basic Ordering Agreement... DLA-Stockpile Materials-001-(BOA) - Tungsten Ores & Concentrates

October 26, 2022

October 27, 2022

12:00pm

WO3 

(lbsWO3) W (lbsW ) WO3 (STU) Lot # Type

Total Total Total Total Total

550 Scotia, NY 1278-3-W Synthetic Scheelite Unknown 168 60140 74.81 44990.734 35677.652 2249.570

716 Scotia, NY P-3188-C Synthetic Scheelite Argentina 172 63128 73.03 46102.379 36559.186 2305.119

860 Scotia, NY P-2874-C Synthetic Scheelite Brazil 177 54116 72.17 39055.517 30971.025 1952.800

1295 Scotia, NY 172 Ferberite Bolivia 47 64817 72.94 47277.520 37491.073 2363.858

1337 Scotia, NY 66 FMS Huebnerite Unknown 62 85826 73.71 63262.345 50167.039 3163.159

1339 Scotia, NY 68 FMS Huebnerite Unknown 162 68536 73.59 50435.642 39995.464 2521.746

1645 Scotia, NY 821 RED STRIPE Wolframite Unknown 14 18765 71.36 13390.704 10618.828 669.533

802 415,328 304,515 241,480 15,226
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Denial of Permit for Marine Mammals

    On July 31, 1997, a notice was published in the Federal Register, 
Vol. 62, No. 147, Page 41072, that an application had been filed with 
the Fish and Wildlife Service by Bruce Shoeneweis for a permit (PRT-
831928) to import a sport-hunted polar bear (Ursus maritimus) trophy, 
taken from the McClintock Channel population, Northwest Territories, 
Canada for personal use.
    Notice is hereby given that on December 3, 1997, as authorized by 
the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) the Fish and Wildlife Service denied the 
requested permit.
    Documents and other information submitted for these applications 
are available for review by any party who submits a written request to 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Rm 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone 
(703) 358-2104 or Fax (703) 358-2281.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
MaryEllen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 98-202 Filed 1-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P