alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: JUNE 20, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

,-,- -: ~ 

. \ '- ' '·.' 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012NM060030) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be serv~d on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
. SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Todd Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 · 

J. M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1004 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JERRY NEAL, §

§ No. 447, 2018

§

Defendant/Counterclaim § Court Below: Court of Chancery

Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff § of the State of Delaware 

Below, §

Appellant, §

§ C.A. No. 12294-VCMR

v. §

§

TRIPLE H FAMILY LIMITED §

PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited §

partnership, §

§

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant §

Below, §

Appellee, §

§

JEFFREY A. HOOPS, §

§

Third-Party Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: April 3, 2019

Decided: April 4, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 4th day of April 2019, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Chancery 

on the basis of its opinion dated July 31, 2018.1

 

1 Triple H Family Limited Partnership v. Neal, 2018 WL 3650242 (Del. Ch. July 31, 2018). 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is hereby AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
FLED IN

BH COURT OF APPEALS

?gi5 m u pm 15 53

USA MAT XERK

No; 05-14-01371-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS

KEITH WAGNOR APPELLANT

VS

DALLAS TEXAS ET AL APPELLEES

ON AN APPEAL FRON THE 298th

DISTRICT COURT COURT OF

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLANTS 2nd MOTION FOR TIME

TO FILE HIS BRIEF

APPELLANT SHOWS THE FOLLOWING:

APPELLANT SHOWS HE CONTINUES TO SUFFER THE AFTER AFFECTS OF

HIS RECENT HEART ATTACK AND HAS BEEN WITHOUT RESOURCES TO

FILE HIS BRIEF, HOWEVER THE APPELLANT HAS NOW BEEN ABLE TO GO TO THE

LAW LIBRARY AND SHEPPARDISE THE NEW ISSUES RAISED IN THE APPELLES

BRIEF WHICH WAS FILED PRIOR TO THE FILING OF THE APPELLANT'S BRIEF.
APPELLANT WILL SHOW THAT MOST OF THE APPELLANTS INCLUDING THE

APPELLANT'S MOTHER GERTRUDE WAGONER ARE DECEASED AND CAN NOT

RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATIONS BROUGHT BY THE THE APPELLEES IN THEIR

ORGINAL PETITION AND THEEFORE AS THE ONLY LIVING TRUE HEIR TO THE

ESTATE THE APPELLANT MUST PROCEED PRO SE. APPELLANT FEELS IF GIVEN 20

ADDITIONAL DAYS TO PREPARE HIS BRIEF HIS CASE WILL PREVAIL BEFORE THIS

COURT IN A TIMELY MANNER IN THE FUTURE.

APPELLANT'S APPEAL IS NECESSARY TO SAVE HIS MOTHER'S HOME WHICH WAS

LEFT TO THE APPELLANT.

PRAYER

APPELLANT PRAYS THIS COURT WILL GRANT HIM 20 DAYS TO FINISH

PREPARING HIS BRIEF AND FILING IT WITH THE COURT.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

KEITH WAGONER PRO SE

.LANT

JS WAQ^^^E^TIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFY THAT A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE FOREGOING INSTRUEMENT

WAS SERVED ON THE APPELLES BY U.S. MAIL AND FAX ON THIS 27TM DAY OF

AUGUST 2015.

WAGONER PRO SE

<r

fe^*
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GERALO c. MlWN Asril 17, 1999 

*-- 

Xoaorable E. C. Thornton, Jr. 

Chairan, &ppropriatlona C5mmlttee 

state or T;rira~ 

Houe of Mqmesentatirss 

Au8tiq, ‘ieus 

Dou sirs 

. 

;. 

. . 

* 

. 
Honorable X. E. Thognton, Jr., April 17, 1939, Page ?2 

Jilso that portlbn of Article 6674q-6 df the Revised 

Civil Statutes pertaining to the use of the gasoline tax 

allocated to the State liighway fund provides that it shall be 

used *for the oonatructlon and maintenance of the pub110 roads 

of the State, constituting and oomprining the ayatem ot State 

hlghwayys of Texas, a8 designated by the State Righway OoPmrimsion 

Of TeXaa."~ 

The l-age or this act Is olear and unambiguous and 

speoirically set8 torth the purpose8 r0r which the State ai@miy 

raad &lall,be used. 
Honorable E. H. Thornton, Jr., April 17, 1939, Page 9 

This ease was reversed by tbs Sup-e Court of Texao 

in 156 5. i?. 197 for the reaaoo that in the oaae In queetlon 

there wae m conflict between tbs. appropriation made and'ln 

the prior law it was alleged to hava affected. The Supreme 

Court held in said case as rollowe: 

"There is m exprees repeal of the fornrtr law; heacre, 

if repealed, it must be by implication, which lrr'not 

ravortd.” 

The luaguags of the Su~remo Court and the SanAntooio 

6aut of Ullll -4th r&err06 to ebmo olaorly ladioater 6bat 

-0 rape& og an o~xhting law by a rt4.r to .#IB apprOp+.diOU 

bill lr oodemwd by the Court&. 

prQporsdrl#era8th0lpte~a~Hpup 

mnt f6oaah o6hor aad aoarly ocmflltt. 

Me this foreming roa8oa8 we baliwe thet,t?o propoti 

outat thoShrw 

appwt- 

. 

wR8sAwu 

.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3836 STANDARD 35.39 5.75 13.63

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 11, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature

Shade Number BROWN 436 Piece/Roll Number 3836

WASHCLOTH, MICROFIBER, 100% 

POLYESTER GL/PD 11-09A
##### 



Exhibit 3.2
 Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations
 ARTICLE I
SHAREHOLDERS
 Annual Meeting.
 Special Meetings.
 Notice of Meetings.
 Quorum; Adjournment.
 Action Without a Meeting.
 1




---



##### 



Proxies.
 Approval and Ratification of Acts of Officers and Directors.
 Order of Business.
     2




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 Number; Election; Term of Office.
 Vacancies.
 Nomination of Candidates for Election as Directors.
   Organization Meeting.
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings.
 Special Meetings.
 Quorum; Adjournment.
 Action Without a Meeting.
 Committees.
 ARTICLE III
OFFICERS
 Election and Designation of Officers.
 4




---



##### 



Term of Office; Vacancies.
 Chairman of the Board.
 President.
 Vice Presidents.
 Secretary.
 Treasurer.
 Other Officers.
 Delegation of Authority and Duties.
 ARTICLE IV
COMPENSATION OF AND TRANSACTIONS WITH
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES
 Directors and Members of Committees.
 5




---



##### 



Officers and Employees.
 Transactions with Directors, Officers, and Employees.
 ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION
 Third Party Actions.
 Derivative Actions.
 Rights After Successful Defense.
 6




---



##### 



Other Determinations of Rights.
 Advances of Expenses.
 Purchase of Insurance.
 Mergers.
 Non-Exclusivity; Heirs.
 ARTICLE VI
RECORD DATES
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES
 Form of Certificates and Signatures.
 Transfer of Shares.
 Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Certificates.
 Transfer Agent and Registrar.
 ARTICLE VIII
AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AND VOTE SECURITIES
  ARTICLE IX
CORPORATE SEAL
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE X
AMENDMENTS
  9
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3561 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require the Financial 

Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before determining that a U.S. nonbank financial company shall be supervised 

by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. MCADAMS, and Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before determining that a U.S. 

nonbank financial company shall be supervised by the 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Stability 

5 Oversight Council Improvement Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3561 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL. 

2 Section 113 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 

3 (12 U.S.C. 5323) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The 

6 Council’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to paragraph 

7 (3), the Council’’; and 

8 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) INITIAL DETERMINATION.—The Council 

10 may not vote on a proposed determination with re11 spect to a U.S. nonbank financial company under 

12 paragraph (1) unless the Council first determines, in 

13 consultation with the company and the primary fi14 nancial regulatory agency with respect to the com15 pany, that a different action by the Council or the 

16 agency (including the application of new or height17 ened standards and safeguards under section 120), 

18 or by the company under a written plan that is sub19 mitted promptly to the Council, is impracticable or 

20 insufficient to mitigate the threat that the company 

21 could pose to the financial stability of the United 

22 States.’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘subsection 

24 (e)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (a)(3) and (e)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-152.

#### James C. Davis, Petitioner v. Brian McKinney, et al.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 254,

181 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5275.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*148Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 442.
No. 11-7142.

#### Ismael Lugo, Petitioner v. Donna Zickefoose, Warden.

565 U.S. 1085, 132 S. Ct. 829,

181 L. Ed. 2d 537,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8775.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*538Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 89.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 5, 1998, and published in the Federal Register 
on May 19, 1998, (63 FR 27591), Stepan Company, Natural Products 
Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of coca leaves (9040), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to import coca leaves to manufacture bulk controlled 
substances.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Stepan Company to import coca 
leaves is consistent with the public interest and with United States 
obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in 
effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. Therefore pursuant to Section 
1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and in 
accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1301.34, 
the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the basic 
class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-20976 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
You

a lifetime of healthy choices,

from bike helmets to exercise.

Simply getting the HPV vaccine at ages 11 or 12 can

help protect your child against certain cancers later in life.

Ask your child’s doctor or nurse about the HPV vaccine.

www.cdc.gov/HPV

JANUARY 2020
No. 11-5970.

#### Andrew Videau, Petitioner v. Kelly Harrington, Warden.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 359,

181 L. Ed. 2d 227,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6796.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG98-91-000]


USGen New England, Inc.; Notice of Application for Commission 
Determination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

July 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, USGen New England, Inc. 
(USGenNE), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business 
at 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161, filed with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) an 
application for determination of exempt wholesale generator status 
pursuant to Part 365 of the FERC's Regulations.
    USGenNE purchased from the New England Power Company (NEP), certain 
fossil and hydroelectric generating facilities (Facilities), and the 
rights to power purchased by NEP and The Narragansett Electric Company 
under certain agreements. USGenNE will be engaged exclusively in the 
business of owning the Facilities and selling electric energy at 
wholesale.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of comments 
to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All 
such motions and comments should be filed on or before August 6, 1998, 
and must be served on the applicant. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20475 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-6713.

#### Anthony Cobb, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1082, 132 S. Ct. 822,

181 L. Ed. 2d 532,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8769.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.

Same case below, 63 So. 3d 771.
No. 11-7057.

#### Patrick F. Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1073, 132 S. Ct. 792,

181 L. Ed. 2d 509,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8333.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 800.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33036-33037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 2-97]


Foreign-Trade Zone 100--Dayton, Ohio Application for Expansion; 
Amendment of Application

    Notice is hereby given that the application of the Greater Dayton 
Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 100, requesting authority to 
expand its zone in the Dayton, Ohio, area (Docket 2-97, 62 FR 3659, 1/
24/97), has been amended to reduce the acreage originally requested for 
Site 1 within the Dayton International Airport Complex.
    While the application originally requested increasing Site 1 by 775 
acres, the amended request proposes to increase Site 1 by 551 acres 
(expanding Site 1 to 1,005.49 acres).
    The comment period is extended until July 17, 1998. Submissions 
(original and

[[Page 33037]]

3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below.
    A copy of the application and the amendment and accompanying 
exhibits are available for public inspection at the following 
locations:

Office of the Port Director, U.S. Customs Service, 3575 Concord Drive, 
Vandalia, Ohio 45377
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16107 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the periodic report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Po Nei Sze, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as
      of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
      of
      the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




Date:November
                  19, 2008
                /s/
                    Po Nei
                    Sze
                    Po
                      Nei Sze
                    Chief
                      Financial Officer (Principal Financialand
                      Accounting
                      Officer)
No. 10-10688.

#### Norman Eugene Lamkin, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 605,

181 L. Ed. 2d 443,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8104.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*444Former decision, 565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 159, 181 L. Ed. 2d 74, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6197.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0001063761
<NAME>     SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         96,057
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 262,842<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F2>
<PP&E>                                     12,606,369
<DEPRECIATION>                              (996,550)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             13,861,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F2>
<BONDS>                                     8,541,538
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   518,596
<COMMON>                                           18
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,718,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               13,861,642<F3>
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,373,814
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 745,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                6,822
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            428,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               212,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                  212,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           212,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (2,227)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  144,392
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .68
<FN>
<F1> Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2> The Company does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3> Includes limited partner's interest in the SPG Operating Partnership,
     limited partners' preferred interest in the SPG Operating Partnership and
     preferred stock of subsidiary of $999,550; $86,154 and $339,530,
     respectively.
</FN>



</TABLE>
No. 11-7094.

#### Corey Deon Martin, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 827,

181 L. Ed. 2d 535,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8762,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I, denied.

*536Same case below, 330 Wis. 2d 832, 794 N.W.2d 926.
(1) Adjusting Price $18.15 CWT

(2) Base Price $16.89 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.26

(4) Price change per gallon $0.1083

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0542

Price change per quart $0.0271

Price change per pint $0.0135

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0102

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0085

Price change per half pint $0.0068

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.11

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.05

Price adjustment per quart $0.03

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Oct. 7, 2018