alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7755

DEE DEIDRE FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARGARET C. HAMBRICK, Regional Director; JOHN W. SHORE, Deputy Regional Director; ROGER TILDEN, Regional Hearing Administrator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3633-CCB) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 515 U.S. 472 (1995). 3 See United States v. Williams , 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). 2 PER CURIAM: Dee Deidre Farmer appeals from the district court's orders dismissing her Bivens 1 civil rights complaint, and denying her motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. The sole issue raised in Farmer’s informal brief is that her placement in administrative segregation and subsequent commitment to controlled housing status in prison violated her due process rights. We find that the district court’s reliance on Sandin v. Conner2 in rejecting this claim is sound. In addition, because Farmer's motion for reconsideration does not demonstrate that her action was improperly dismissed, we find that the district court's denial of her Rule 59(e) motion was not an abuse of discretion. 3 We deny Farmer’s motion for appointment of counsel, and affirm both district court orders. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
) 

Director

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 

February 17, 2022 

Public Health Service

National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention (CDC) 

395 E Street, SW -Ste 9200 

Washington, DC 20201 

PH: 202-245-0625 

Dear Tribal Leader:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and American Indian and Alaska Native

(Al/AN) federally recognized tribes share the goal of enhancing worker safety and health

in tribal communities. Effective consultation results in information exchange, mutual 

understanding, and informed decision-making. 

Thank you for your feedback and recommendations to improve the draft American

Indian and Alaska Native Worker Safety and Health Strategic Plan. CDC/NIOSH 

recognizes our unique relationship with federally recognized tribes, and we are

committed to fulfilling our critical role in promoting the health, safety, and well-being of 

AI/AN workers and their communities.

As we review and update the strategic plan, we are using various methods to gather input,

including holding the virtual tribal consultation session on February 3, 2022, and

collecting public comments through the Federal Register notice published on November 

30,2021 at [NIOSH 345]. We understand the importance of providing timely and clear 

responses to federally recognized tribes, and we remain committed to holding open and

meaningful engagement in the dissemination and implementation of the strategic plan. 

We continue to accept written recommendations and feedback until 5 pm (EST) on 

February 24, 2022; comments may be submitted by email to niocindocket@cdc.gov or by 

mail to Sherri Diana, NIOSH Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-34, Cincinnati, 

Ohio 45226-1998. After the comment period for NIOSH 345 concludes, we will provide a 

report by April 7, 2022, summarizing the feedback and next steps.
B-P1100 (4/18) ©2018 Magellan Health, Inc.

Access specialists who can provide expert guidance, information and 

personalized referrals to service providers anywhere in the country. 

Get free and confidential help with:

• Child care and parenting

• Adult care and aging

• Education and extracurricular 

activities

• Home improvement and emergency 

preparedness

Give us a call or learn more 

at MagellanAscend.com

Work-life 

services to support 

your life’s journey

Employee Assistance Program

1-866-580-9046
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: W.T.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: W.T.H., A MINOR

:

:

:

:

:

No. 313 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: W.T.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: W.T.H., A MINOR

:

:

:

:

:

No. 314 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 19-02 STANDARD 36.38 -4.87 5.79

Tolerance

1 1

FULL DULL 

LIMIT 35.61 -4.40 5.45 -0.77 0.47 -0.34 0.70

2 2

FULL VIOLET 

LIMIT 36.95 -4.30 5.63 0.57 0.57 -0.16 0.74

3 3

EXTREME RED 

LIMIT 35.53 -4.24 5.53 -0.85 0.63 -0.26 0.82

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number SAGE GREEN 1666 Piece/Roll Number 19-02

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT February 11, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, INSULATING THREE LAYER, IWOL GL-PD 12-16

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SPARTON CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, Sparton Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the Sparton Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of
January 1, 2014; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.10 of the Plan the Company has the authority to amend the plan to the extent permitted by
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company does hereby desire to amend the Plan to permit the discretionary right by the Company
to enter into an endorsement split dollar agreement with certain designated Plan participants; and 
 WHEREAS, in order to effect a timely establishment and
enrollment of these split dollar agreements for eligible participants along with appropriate communications the Company does hereby wish to delegate its responsibilities relating to said tasks. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by adoption of the following Resolutions: 

RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended by incorporation of the following Section 6.12: 

6.12 ENDORSEMENT SPLIT DOLLAR. To the extent deemed appropriate, the Company may or may not enter into an Endorsement Split Dollar Agreement
(the “Agreement”) providing for additional benefits to the Beneficiary(ies) in the event of the Participant’s death. Said additional amounts shall not be limited by Section 6.11 hereto. The Company shall retain full discretion to
determine the amount of benefit offered in the Agreement and payable in the event of the Participant’s death. Furthermore the Company reserves the right to amend or terminate the Agreement at anytime and for any reason without consent of the
Participant. All benefits and rights under this Section 6.12 shall terminate, if not cancelled previously, as of the Participant’s separation from service as defined under Section 409A. 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President of Human Resource shall be delegated with the responsibility to carry out such actions necessary to effect the
eligibility, enrollment and communication of the split dollar agreements for those Participants designated on Exhibit A; and 
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that this
shall become effective as of July 1, 2014. 
 Signed: /s/ Steve Korwin 

Name: Steve Korwin 
 Title: SVP, Quality & Engineering

 Date: 7/1/2014
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141757) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 14, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM. ORDER

Appellate case name The City.of Houston v. Atser, L.P

Appellate case number: 01-1.0-00240-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-48039

Trial court: 334th District Court, Harris Cnty., Tex.

On October 29, 2012, Appellant filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered

that Appellee’s response, if any, xs due Monday, December 3, 2012. We request that, in the

response, if any, Appellee address the impact of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Rusk

State Hospital v. Black on the analysis of our appellate jurisdiction. See Rusk State Hospital v.

Black, No. 10-0548, 2012 WL 3800218, at *6 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2012) ("We hold that if immunity

as first asserted on interlocutory appeal,. [Civil Practice and Remedies Code]. section 51.014(a)

does not preclude the appellate court from having to consider the issue at the outset in order to

determine whether it has jurisdiction to address the merits.").

2012.

It is furthered ordered that Appellant’s reply, if any, is due Monday, December 10,

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Evelyn V. Keyes

IEI Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date November 21, 2012
No. 11-5218.

#### In re Maurice Grayton, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1055, 132 S. Ct. 796,

181 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8645.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|February 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH S. ORD                                                                            
|                 |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

h0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144619

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144619

COA: 300538

Wayne CC: 09-026848-FC

JEREMIAH JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc.(the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Michael D. West, Chief Executive Officer, and Russell Skibsted, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



Date:
March 30, 2020



|/s/
    Michael D. West     | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Michael
    D. West         | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|                            | 
|/s/
    Russell Skibsted    | 
|Russell
    Skibsted        | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer |
SPADARO.ROBERT.F.JR.12919150

40

Digitally signed by 

SPADARO.ROBERT.F.JR.1291915040 

Date: 2021.03.26 11:33:31 -04'00'













Item 

#

Description of Proposed 

Item

Make/ Model 

Number of Proposed 

item

1 Industrial Hydraulic Crane w/6' - 15' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-20-1

2 Industrial Crane w/ 7' - 19' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-35-2

3 Industrial Crane w/ 7' - 19' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-40-2

4 Industrial Crane w/ 8'2" - 20'2" Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-80-1 Small Boom

5 Industrial Crane w/ 9'6" - 24' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-80-2 Medium Boom

6 Industrial Crane w/ 11'6" - 30' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-80-3 Large Boom

7 Industrial Crane w/ 15' - 35' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-100-3

8 Industrial Crane w/ 15'2" - 36'2" Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-200-2 Small Boom9 Industrial Crane w/ 15'6" - 50' Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-200-3 Large Boom

10 Industrial Crane w/ 15'7" - 50'1" Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-250-3

11 Industrial Crane w/ 18' - 64'6" Boom Broderson Manufacturing Corp / IC-400-312 Rough Terrain Crane

Broderson 

Manufacturing Corp / 

RT-400

SPE8EC-21-D-0078 AMERICAN MATERIAL HANDLING (AMH) (BRODERSON & MAEDA) CRANES
13 6,210-lbs capacity Diesel Mini Crawler Crane Maeda USA / MC285

14 6.560-lbs capacity Diesel Mini Crawler Crane Maeda USA / MC305

15 8,480-lbs capacity Diesel Mini Crawler Crane Maeda USA / MC405

16 10,800-lbs capacity Telescoping Crawler Crane Maeda USA / CC1485

MAEDA
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015

Fabric Nomenclature LOOP FASTENER TAPE, HOOK AND LOOP, NYLON A-A-55126B

Shade Number TAN 499 Piece/Roll Number 3822

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Rectangular L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* DEcmc*

Standard 3822 -------------------- 45.23 1.81 15.76

Tolerance

1 3822A VIOLET 

LIMIT

2 3822B GREEN LIMIT 0.74 -0.44 0.76 0.86

3 3822C RED LIMIT 0.41 0.52 0.28 0.66

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3361

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2019

 Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Watkins, and 
 Mr. Tipton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reliable Investment in Vital Energy 
Reauthorization Act'' or the ``RIVER Act''.

SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND EFFICIENCY 
              IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Hydroelectric Production Incentives.--Section 242 of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15881) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``22'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ``section 
        29(d)(2)(B)'' and inserting ``section 45K(d)(2)(B)'';
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``20'' and inserting 
        ``32''; and
            (4) in subsection (g), by striking ``each of the fiscal 
        years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 
        2019 through 2036''.
    (b) Hydroelectric Efficiency Improvement.--Section 243(c) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking 
``each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of 
fiscal years 2019 through 2036''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-10641.

#### Scott R. Zabriskie, Petitioner v. Hess, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 842, 132 S. Ct. 155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 71,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6312,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-30735)  pertaining to the Farrel  Corporation 1997 Employees' Stock
Purchase  Plan  of  our  reports  dated  March  19,  1998  with  respect  to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Farrel Corporation included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                                 Ernst & Young LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
March 30, 1998
OFFICE 

### OFTHE 

### A'ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUBTINchapter Nl880 ta a lwgulationof the



### prrotioo

oimadfo%nh There18 nothing in this Oaaptev whiti pwhiblta tha sale 

### OS wmtmeoptivaa 852 nakoa It a 

### penal offense al088 the abowoqtmted 

### portim 

### or Ilrt. 740, 

### P. 6. baa that 

### OrrOot. YOU will ateto that Art. 7Jh0, 

### P. 6. aeta 

### oirt oi&alnexwptiana

to ‘Mm offanra 

### eonMoCed 

### dth thapnotioe 

### arlwwdtto.

Awtiale 740, Peaal Code, aa amended, la aa rollowat 

## .Wtbiag in thlllGhaptet ahallbo 80 aonatmted 88 to 

### dlaadminatea&ainrt any partiaular 

### school0~ ayataa 

### or madhal 

## gmaotioe,

nw to 8rraot or lwit in any way the appltaatian VP use 

### .0r the prinolples, tot&a,- OP 

### teaohlnga **or** 

### say ehmah in tha **tdtmtwti0tt** 

### 8th

**the 8i0k** **0~ msir0attj**  **w pnpr,**  **vithmtt th0**  **ore or**  **q b2g**  VP **mtO2-m rsamdy,**  **pmvidod aanltary**  **and** wamnthe lava **and** squlAtiana **are** waplled **witht and**  **3mnm.d rwther,**  that **all** those 

### 80 mlnlatwlng **0~** 

### orfoe fng 80 mfnfater to the alok or suffering by prayer shall refmln froa mlntal&ng orfiaea, 

### exarpt forthepwpoao 

### 0r exwaiaing thaminalpl~a, taneta, or to8e.bIa88 

### or the 6huroh 

### 0r vhbh they am bona ride 

### aembora. The urovi

### aionaor thirClmptar do not 

### amlr to.dantiata, guly

## qualified

and mngiatorod

underthe lava

## or thiaaBtat0, who ooaf3ae their praatlae atriatlr to dmtlat~; no~ to duly liaeumed optomtrlata, who aonfLna their pnatiae l tpiatly to optomtry na deftned by 

### at#utm$ POD to 

### -888, whop-aties nuraSng only, ‘DDTto du4 lleenaed ohiropodlata, vha aonflnetheir pwati00 atriatly **to** &ropo&y aa dt?iined by atatutei nOs to pulB*~~-_. 

## 419

-9:' (Underaowtng a4wa) We-t~oul~~JBIItbt~~~2nedpo~ic0 of thla artble la an ateeption, 8Wtewgh It uamee at the end 

### 0r~~~~i~liat0ru6~tfolu, thewholob0bge0dws.ad lnVernoni Amtotatad 

### Penal~U6do 88 'ewo9tlaua.R Znatead,
tt aoama to **ua** to **bo an**  **inebaltut** a **rwthe~ defbxltion**  **or** ***** **inX** to thoae *et out **in** Artlale

Bat a 

### aerioua

**f4ueatlon** rrlaea **aa to**  **whether. aaid**  aentenuo **la** too vague **and** 

### inbrrinih **to defina**  a penal 

### 0rm.80,
ao aa **to** me&t the 

### mquiremmta or Artialea 1~8nd 6 or the ?elul &de of 1925. 

### Ihia qtoatlcnt **appear8 to**  

### 0s 80 crloao that 

### vo thinkit 

### improper



### r0r ua to 

### pa88 on It, wUhout 

### a pvaewnt 

### 0r the @.n1~8

0r 

### tMmbhl Armala.

Yrowavery truly



### w. R.Allen Aaaiatant
No. 11-6247.

#### Ahimaaz Ben Levi, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,

181 L. Ed. 2d 427,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8151.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 404 Ill. App. 3d 1191, 374 Ill. Dec. 1086, 996 N.E.2d 781.
No. 11-340.

#### Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Petitioner v. Ramzy Ayyad, et al.

565 U.S. 1014, 132 S. Ct. 555,

181 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8028.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.

*398Same case below, 193 Cal. App. 4th 298, 122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 726.
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP 2.9. APPENDIX 2.9**

**ASSET STATUS REPORTING CODES**

**AP2.9-**

AP2.9-1

APPENDIX 2.9
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2005