alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-115, RM-9277]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Stevensville, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Topaz 
Enterprises, Inc. proposing the allotment of Channel 283A to 
Stevensville, Montana, as that community's first local broadcast 
service. The channel can be allotted to Stevensville without a site 
restriction at coordinates 46-30-24 and 114-05-18. Canadian concurrence 
will be requested for this allotment.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Dale A. Ganske, President, L. Topaz 
Enterprises, Inc., 5546-3 Century Ave., Middleton, Wisconsin 53562.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-115, adopted July 1, 1998, 
and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19304 Filed 07-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3468 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3468

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that sex 
    includes sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2019

   Mr. Brown of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Crist, Ms. 
   Moore, Ms. Norton, Ms. Haaland, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Soto, and Ms. 
    Craig) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that sex 
    includes sexual orientation and gender identity, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Pay for All Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. SEX TO INCLUDE SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY.

    Section 6(d)(4) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
206(d)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) by striking ``subsection, the term'' and inserting the 
        following: ``subsection--
            ``(A) the term''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) the term `gender identity' means the gender-related 
        identity, appearance, mannerisms, or other gender-related 
        characteristics of an individual, regardless of the 
        individual's designated sex at birth;
            ``(C) the term `sex' includes--
                    ``(i) a sex stereotype;
                    ``(ii) pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical 
                condition;
                    ``(iii) sexual orientation or gender identity; and
                    ``(iv) sex characteristics, including intersex 
                traits; and
            ``(D) the term `sexual orientation' includes homosexuality, 
        heterosexuality, and bisexuality.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6513.

#### Manuel Walcott, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 990, 132 S. Ct. 529,

181 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7644.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 860.
June 25, 2015

Mr. Marc Fairstein 47 Old Forge Road Millington, NJ 07946

Dear Mr. Fairstein:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 16, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2277), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers Corporation.

Date: May 6, 2010



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-6945.

#### Tony Miller, Petitioner v. Mitch Perry, Warden.

565 U.S. 1097, 132 S. Ct. 853,

181 L. Ed. 2d 556,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8955.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Box4_Table 9 Ins-adjusted
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3362 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 49, United State Code, to require small hub airports to 
      construct areas for nursing mothers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Airport Mothers' Rooms Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. MOTHERS' ROOMS.

    Section 47107(w) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``In fiscal year 2021'' 
        and all that follows through ``the Secretary of 
        Transportation'' and inserting ``The Secretary of 
        Transportation'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by striking ``one men's and one 
        women's'' and inserting ``at least one men's and at least one 
        women's'';
            (3) by striking paragraph (2)(A) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Airport size.--The requirements in paragraph 
                (1) shall only apply to applications submitted by the 
                airport sponsor of--
                            ``(i) a medium or large hub airport in 
                        fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year 
                        thereafter; and
                            ``(ii) a small hub airport in fiscal year 
                        2023 and each fiscal year thereafter, but only 
                        if such airport has been categorized as a small 
                        or medium hub airport for the 3 consecutive 
                        fiscal years prior to the fiscal year in which 
                        the application is submitted.'';
            (4) in paragraph (2)(B) by striking ``the date of enactment 
        of this Act complies with the requirement in paragraph (1)'' 
        and inserting ``October 5, 2018, complies with the requirement 
        in paragraph (1)(A)''; and
            (5) in paragraph (2)(C) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 49, United State Code, to require small hub airports to 
      construct areas for nursing mothers, and for other purposes.
```
No. 11-6586.

#### Adam W. Davis, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1066, 132 S. Ct. 774,

181 L. Ed. 2d 497,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8481.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-424.

#### Jerry Joseph Lomas, Petitioner v. Anthony Hedgpeth, Warden.

565 U.S. 1061, 132 S. Ct. 779,

181 L. Ed. 2d 488,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8477.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
≥95% (34 awardees)

75% - 94% (18 awardees)

50% - 74% (1 awardee)

25% - 49% (1 awardee)

<25% (0 awardee)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (1 awardee)

Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2017

National Participation: 95% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2017 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
No. 10-1238.

No. 10-1403.

#### Rene Junk, as Parent and Next Friend of T. J., a Minor, Petitioner v. Terminix International Company. Jim Breneman, Petitioner v. Rene Junk, as Parent and Next Friend of T. J., a Minor.

565 U.S. 816, 132 S. Ct. 94,

181 L. Ed. 2d 24,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6900.

October 3, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 628 F.3d 439.
(logo) Cohen Financial

 

 

February 28, 2018

 

 

**REPORT ON ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITHAPPLICABLE SECURITIES AND**

**EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICINGCRITERIA**

 

 

For the calendar yearending December 31, 2017, Cohen Financial, a division of SunTrust Bank. Inc.("Cohen Financial") has been a Servicer for certain mortgage loans onbehalf of various Master Servicers and other investors.

 

Management of CohenFinancial is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sRegulation AB for commercial mortgage backed security transactions for which itprovides servicing on behalf of the Master Servicer and other investors (the"Services"), except for the criteria set forth in Sections 1122(d)( 1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) and 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), ("Applicable ServicingCriteria") which Cohen Financial has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Services. as of andfortheyearendedDecember31,2017("ReportingPeriod").

 

Management of CohenFinancial has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission With respectto the Services as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Based on suchassessment, management believes that as of and for the year ended December 31,2017, Cohen Financial has complied in all material respects with the ApplicableServicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securitiesand Exchange Commission relating to the Services.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, aregistered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report withrespect to the management's assertion of compliance with the ApplicableServicingCriteria as ofand for the year ended December31, 20I7.

 

 

/s/ Dean M. Wheeler

DeanM.Wheeler

HeadofInvestorServicesOperations

 

/s/ Ted Wright

Ted Wright

Senior VicePresident

 

 

4601 College Boulevard.Suite 300 | Leawood, Kansas 66211

866 315 6212 Office | 866 3156202 Fax

 

www.cohenfinancial.com
No. 10-11235.

#### Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Petitioner v. Board of County Commissioners, et al.

565 U.S. 1055, 132 S. Ct. 796,

181 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8516.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 10-10791.

#### Arthur D. Jackson, Petitioner v. J. P. Gonzalez, et al.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 606,

181 L. Ed. 2d 444,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8240.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 172, 181 L. Ed. 2d 84, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6165.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officer of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q to
which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)")
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ARNOLD S. LIPPAArnold S. Lippa
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# Schedule B8

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12SPE4A6-15-R-0340		&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Schedule B8
amend1warrants.htm




EXHIBIT 4.3


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


WARRANTS


 

 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO WARRANTS (“Amendment”) is entered into as of March 28, 2012 between Gemini Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation (the “Holder”), and Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, on or about April 15, 2011, the Company issued the Holder three 7-year warrants (collectively, “Warrants”), including (A) a warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.30, (B) a warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40, and (C) a warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.60;


 


WHEREAS, on or about the date hereof, the Company and the Holder are entering into a Resale Restriction Agreement which limits the Holder’s right to sell shares of Common Stock as described therein (“Leak-Out Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to enter into this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Company and the Holder agree as follows:


 


1.  So long as the Leak-Out Agreement is in effect, Section 2(f) (Forced Exercise) of the Warrants shall not apply and be of no force or effect.


 


2. Except to the extent amended hereby, the Warrants shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. All capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Warrants.


 


4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original document.  Electronic signatures, whether by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means, shall be treated as original signatures.


 







 


[Signature page to follow.]


 






 


  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first set forth above.


 


 




 



	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.





 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Adams  






	 	Name:	Kevin Adams
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer





 



 


 


 



	 	
HOLDER:


	 	 
	 	
GEMINI MASTER FUND, LTD.


By: GEMINI STRATEGIES, LLC, as investment manager







 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Steven Winters






	 	Name:	Steven Winters
	 	Title: 	President









 


 


 


 


2
No. 11-6443.

#### Albert Corkern, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 764,

181 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8597.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Ferrochromium Offering

Low Carbon

Item/Pile # Origin Cr % C % Net Wt. (Lb) LbCr Wt. Min. Bid (LbCr)

0239/63-A Domestic 66.51% 0.13% 322,000 214,162.2

Location

Pt. Pleasant, WV

Totals 322,000 214,162

High Carbon

Item/Pile # Origin Cr % C % Net Wt. (ST) STCr Wt. Min. Bid (STCr)

Domestic 64.38% 6.46% 1,000 643.80

Totals 1,000 643.80

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

74.037

Unit of Measure................... LbsCr/STCr Offering Posting Time............

April 02, 2024

April 03, 2024

9:30am

12:00pm

214,162.2

FISCAL YEAR 2024

Basic Ordering Agreement... Ferrochromium Date of Posting...................

Grade................................. Low/High Carbon Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Location

Hammond, IN

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

0206/007
No. 11-433.

#### The Jewish Home of Eastern Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Department of Health and Human Services.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 837,

181 L. Ed. 2d 527,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8695.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 532.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers Corporation.

Date: May 6, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-6307.

#### Armando Benavente-Franco, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 441,

181 L. Ed. 2d 286,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7226.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 357.
No. 11-215.

#### Sandra D. Evans and Dan Gargan, Petitioners v. Wapato Heritage, LLC, et al.

565 U.S. 1059, 132 S. Ct. 760,

181 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8652.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 557.
No. 11-554.

#### Mel Stewart, Petitioner v. Oregon.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1028,

181 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 326.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 237 Or. App. 86, 239 P.3d 263.