.. .. - . . .
. . .r . •. - ~t~5~ ~ `

_ .

i 3" 

### 7 i '~'3~x~ +Ff ~~, ),~C ts S♦ t'Y•. t ., r 3 ts -~,_ t :r ~ rq~ .y~,,, a 

### ~~ ` 3• a w cf sr~'- r . . c ` ~ J'r'F fi# }R~ ! ~{ :" j yY

~kj ~ 4 •' r: - a ~1 t l.~~

t~ 1~~; ~ -. F '~.. ~ •++.~ .

Y ~ t

~ Y -

•~ y , l. ~ 

## W R

_ r '

'~ 

## 2=

~ 

## . ~

fY

~ •:: } ~ ~ CALI F CT11A AIR Q UAL17Y _ - O R1

Revision ^!j' ~~~ . „1'•t•.. . ..

• 

### CALIF M 

### NIA

9 ~ 3 .d }
~ fi t] O •,
r q '

~ •

•

rs; ` s ~ r

X~ rJ orie • . if

h " ;



# _ .,.. . , y ~ 

### J .~ - ~ `, ~ •- Fj

4~



# ~ i

; y l -

~ Y U R
. r , r - # r -
t ly ~ _ ~ ^~ ~'~ ~ r~ k Y "L'r!r : asa ^y ~~ • ~ ~ `' r• ~ '•. ~~ ," .

~ 1f+ {ir + »: ~ - >~ f _ { ~~; ,~ ~ >. ~s!' ~•t~1:6~F.'~ 32di ~~?~'Z~

:t:K
~ .. ~ e`. ~ e4' ~ • .._..:.: ~ i:
~ :'t. r.. .._ _., r. _.'.:r ~

### FOREE-;,4R0 ishis chaater o{Jtt inps tre control strategies currentl;r 5eing imlecmented in Valifornia as well as those proposed as Part 

## of ti-,e nonattairrent olans adooted by local agencies and proposed for aGoption by 'he Air Resour;.es Board (AR3). These strategies ? ave tepn 

### cvr s`cereu by 1oc31 aCenc{es involve+ ~ 

### in the ore

~ 

### aration of n;;!-3tt.a;n-

- en_ >>ns oursuarit 'o the 1977 Ciean Air Act An-end- -c-n;s. ": is c.iapter snouid be used in conjunction with such pians.

{his claot.er Kas considered by the AF?B at an April 

## 1379 wu3lic hearing and adoote. as an SIP revision for submittal <.v the cnv::-or^sen•al rrotection xge.^.cy.

i?te c1haYVer is cor-a=ete except for Settions IS and IC wnich are h-ein,g -vrri>tpn to ref?ect ARS's currient policy

~~ 

### *rd9r,g transr:or?,ation control reasures. These sections will te a

~~ 

### ¢j t.: ,h's Lrav .er wren N.ey are completed.

.ic'ns r-egard>nr s.

~ 

### :s c'ap.er can be aQdressec Lo.


## k:r

~

~ 

### •esc:rr^ .?5 aoar
- ~ rECPD - i S th S t:-eee t Sacra--»r;.o, C.r



### frcr r"_ . t

~ 

### ± .

~ ..i: y ;..R

~ C , i 2 1


### A'r 'dR''s`c;e .. .L`v J f i j'.. ~ .! • t ..YA^ ~ P

~ r u ~ ~~ '. ~ ..-~t ~ ~ e

~ 

### `' _ u ~ y

.. 

### .S
.. , ,. .. 

## 9

,•^:C'
- ~ 3S ;.. nUSi;:^."ABLE E i.C.`3;;:NiS :ntraduction ...,........

.



### .. Vehicular Sources ...... :.................................. ~

~ 

### . s'zchnical Contrcis - Cverview ......................... • ]. •
...................... ..

^lSS
~ O!1
~ , it:1i;
~ CiO

~ SS '•

~ 1ei CO.n,ten' Li, , ,Zta*_i0ns .............. . ....... 8 

## 3. -::ture Technicat ContrBTs ............ ~



### - ~ 

### • :.-iSS;cns Stsndards `ar New `lehicles ....,. 4 Y "o[cr YQhicle inspecticn Pr^,graT ............1J C. Cantroi Of E-;is5icr.s `;;;-t Eieet 'lptlicias

. • d. von:rOl o` —;isstcns

- -r;:- Other

. SoU1
- ces ... ; n.. ^ F . . . . . . . '• , ?,

~ •flr. '7i ~;~1 ~ ..iy.

~ L-

~ UL; ~ ` fenlci£' Reill'Ctit •.

~ t i i r• Jt~A~ 

## meaSUreS .... ......t2 :rans;:orLat;oz Cuntrals .......... .
....... ! C. -:
~ 

### `.;rp 'r3ns..cri.a. :n Cnntr

~ t ~ re :...............

~ 35Lre5 ............... '
a.. a ~~'• ~~i.,~,~ ?vn;rY 3C:SrC±

~ d 7 r .1r1=r!

~ lr j tnir,^ ................. ~ .3 .°- •S;.liF' ~1~

rPa

~ t^!i-l-•_` ^ Ftr .......... ....................i ~



### n t' . ..............-........13

~~ 

## r!v

~ 

## r„ .• .................................2. ^ K. 

# ....^ ~ 

# .......................................::J 0.,.i" ..'a ~ 5 . . . . 

### Svi`ur ;:;4:3

~~ 

### i.r.ds ......................................31 

# J pn.pr
~ i v ~ '.M. w `f ~$ ~nn~ . . .. . .. . ...... .. .... . ..... ........... ~~

„ 

## .} S ', 

## °"}'

.. 

## J ..................................... ~L~

v 

## We

~ 

## e,s ; •~e ..........................................

~ 

## 2

'!" " ; ~ F'•-'''-' ~~J~.%t ✓ _°f5........ ...................

.

~
' rt

~ es:

~~~ 

### r red arC 

### P' ~;~ ne,± ............... ; ~ t; • • . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. -••.^ ~ a ~ ; i t n•-,..r+, .t

......... . ^

t

.. . .

.............................. ~~

~ ,A •S
~ * a °. '
~ ../ i!V ~~.' ~{~. •~ 0.yr . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .y ~
.•t 

### x ~ 

### A•-

.. Yf

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ✓ ~

.. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. .. . . _.i-t±y

............................. 

## ~ :



### ..............

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

## 6 2 u . ri

^7+ ~ ? j H ~ -°;• _

~ f- ..................... .........'J•.



## ..................

.......... ± ~ 

### ,• - :J ., _ . _ ! r

! _ ^ r

_ _ , _ _ , .. . ~ 

### .

## LIST OF TASLES
Table 4-1 Trends in New Passenaer Car Emission

Standards in California .......................... 4 Table 4-2 1973

~ 

### - 7 =+ission Standards `or New Passenger Cars * L',ght and Mediunr-Duty Trutks by 

## CYS-iI Test FroCedure ............................ 5 Table 4-3 1979 Eniss;on Standards i'or

~ 

### -eaYy-vut,•



# 'r'ehicles ......................................... S Table 4-y 1980 and r"u4urp C.ai i;ornia ar.d Federal

Ead:aust C..

~ 

### ission Stand3rds for ?assenger Cars, i.Ight andMedjL.r?-C:.ttf "r=eniCles
............. a 

## Table :-S Future Califorrtia ;xhaust Ernfssfons

Stardarids 

### fcr :-ea,-y-Cw:y :'e

~ , 

### ;cles
................ 1

~ 

### J 

### Table 4-6

. Transportaaion C-cnt UI uieasures

by PonLtta:rrvnt ArPas
........................... " 

### Table 4-' Riye >'i ~,~ 

### ers of Gontrol

~ 

### .egulatiors



## in £ffet*_ as of .:anuarf 1. 

## 197 1 9 

## by 

# Air ?,a$ir

. ..................................... I= iable 4-3 Status Qt 'iS?5!`t;SKA?S Celegation i0

Local Air yt33i+1t; vn Z.ontrol Otstricws 

## as o' Januar; ' E 1979 ............................ ~ 

## 5 T ab1e 4- 9
. ~

- ..T-..aQ'd:jla .,. ..^r4'.

~ .'7,'Li.rif: ,

° ~j~ '1~ 1:F5
...............

* TO vl' li,t.,^,.1:ided in a f-j

~ - 'J'rn



## ~


# It
. ~

### APpENDICES
Arcerdix 4-A Ac:dresses of Local Air 'ollution Control



## Agercies ApDendix 4-9 Caieoory IIMoCel Rules for StationLry Sources - Avaiiable seaarateiy frorr, thle AK3.



### T? , e fol iowi;sV ap; , endices are rorLions of ;.he Cal ifornia A.d:ninistrative Ccde. Persons ;ntprested in tAhese aoFendices s!

- ould refer directly 'o •'_ke co-de. 

### A;ryendix 4-C ARB Sandblast;ng Standards, includea in Title 17, 

### C.aliforn:a A.k-:inisLrat°re Code, Section 92^rC.4 (R.e:`er io ca:'e) rivpe;<dix Axa Gesos ine Yap-or ControT PrcceAures, includer' ;n Title I7, Cal ifornia Adminis'rative Co-ce, Sectian 94

1 C'OD (Rerpr :o coUe) 

### A.p;.

~ 

### erL`x 4-L LkRg Ve?iicle E.-:ssi;,n Controls ircluded in Titie 13, C.aiiforz;a n

~



### -, inistrative C^de, C. 1 1a ' ter 3, S

~ 

### a:.ter i. Hrstor Vehicle Pcl lvtior Contr-al ~t~ 

### Devfces, Sut

~ 

### c'.°z^ter 2. EnZorc : o= Yehicle cnissior, Stzndari".s arid Surveilianta ;esting, Sub , chapter 3. Higtrira;+ and w,ardator.o Ins;ectfcn -mi5sior, StanLards, Subcn.apt.er S. Standards for '.

~ 

### iotor VeHcle ruels, ard Sutachapt¢r ?. Speczf3caticins fvr FiII Pipes and CpRenings of *ietor Yehic.e b uol 

## Ta„ks f

~ 

## POfsr to co-dp}

»~~~ .^• x -, R 7 OH H ~ i 1 ` ~*♦ yOI ~ i A n. ,, rC''.C3 s L,lr ~ t urr n^ Q C~ t ~a ~~ Cn5 i

~ C u ~ 

### i:;e ;€ T Caliso-nia rdm}nistra:lve C.o•de, Sec:'^n 

## ED1.C , eM se-q. !?s`er *_o cme',

## Chapter 4 CONTROL STRATEGIES
INTRODUCTION
The Ci ean Ai r Act Amendments of 1977 set forth requi rements for asajor revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 1979 submittal to EPA requires incorporation of a nonattainment plan (NAP) for each area in the state that is not na+ attaining national ambientair quality standards. (In California, 26 areas nere designated nonattainment for one or eore pollutahts although Board action asay proposa that soa+e areas presently designated nonattainsaent cay be redesignated unclassified or attair+ment betause of the recently revised ozone standard.) 

## A key component of the locally adoptPd ttAPs is the control reasure package selected as the basis of the strateqy for attainaaent. This chapter of the SIP outlines California's overall controi strateqy xhich includes control weasures being iqplesented at both the state and local level. It also outlines the direction the ARB and local agenciesare ®oving to develop and implement future control maeasures. The presentation is divided into two categories: vehicuiar and nonvehicular controls. Exhaust euission controls for vehicles have been in effect in California since 1960. Qverall, California's standards have been more stringent than those established by the federal governa,ent for the other 49 states. Coaplianct xith the established eeoissions standards rill 

## continue to result in reduction of eaiissions in the future as the

- vehicle mix becoaies comprised of a larger fraction of later-year models 

## rhich have progressively more stringent controls applied ta them. Soae of the llAPs contain vehicle related eraission cor,trol t.actics. It is unclear at this tieoe whether these measures will 

## be accepted for inclusion in the SIP subaission as attaiment or as raaintenance measurgs.

-1-

## The Executive Officer 

## has been dirrected by the Air Resources Board to

make this detera+ination after consultation with the appropriate local agency officials. In addition to control measures limiting exhaust emissions, there are other measures that reduce emissions by reducing dependence on the motor vehicle, providing more efficient use of motor vehicles, or reducing their use. These are knexn as transportation control measures (TCKs). The EPA has defined 18 types of T04s listed in Section 108(f) of the Clean A1r Act as 'reasonably availabie." If an extension beyond 1982 for the ozone or cartion monoxide standard attainment is requested, all 18 TCHs must be implemented or adequate justification provided for rejecting any of these aaeasures that are considered iocally unreasonable. Because of a general deficiency in time and resources needed to perform thorough analyses of the 18 TCI4s 

## as requiro-d for the 1979 subaittals, aany measures will be re-exaarined during the continuing planning and impleaent,ation progrm. Due to the coa+plexity of issues involved in the adoption of TC?i, a great deal ©ore woric and support and the invoivement of the statP legislature, Congress, and the auto industry is essentiaT to insure the success of the program. One of the TCMs, a prograo designed to insure the effectiveness of vehicle earissions standards, is the 14otor Vehicie Inspection Program (liYIP). Just as for the 17 other TC?4s. the Ciean Air Act requires that all areas not desionstrating attainment by 1982 for carbon oonoxide or ozone arust iepleaDent an M41Ir. 

## 11APs submitted to date recognize this requirement. tiowever, 1oc.al and state jurisdictions lack the statutory authorization to iaplemnt an annual lRYIP. The Legislature needs to provide appropriate enabling iegislation. The EPA is requiring the 6overnor's cocaMtwent to obtain such legislation as a part of the 1979 pian, and that enabling legislation be enacted by Juiy 1, 1979 to qualify any area for an extension. Legislation (Senate Bill 64) vas introduced early in 1979 to ailow the state to implewnt MVIP at the request of local agencies. Another requirecent for an adequate 1tAP is that stationary source control measures be included for 11 sourte cateyories that EPA has identifled unless there are no such sources in the nonattairw-*nt area. EPA guidelines for these cat.egories are kr.oin as control technoiocy 

## guidelines (CTGs). The categories are as follows: 1. Surface Coating of A<,tocobiies 

## and Light-Quty Trucks, Cans, Y*ta1 Coils, Paper, and fabric Products 2. Surface Coating o.` Y*tal 

## Furniture 3. Surface Coat`.ng of Large Apvliances
-2-

## 4. Surface Coating for Insulation of Magnetic Wire

5. Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks 6. Bulk Gasoline Plants 7. Gasoline Loading Terminals ' 8. Service Stations Stage I

9. Miscellaneous Refinery Sources 10. Solvent Metal Cleaning 11. Cutback Asphalt In addition 

## to measures concerning the above 11 categories. EPA requires that MAPs pravide for the adoption and submittal of additional control measures within one year after publication of subsequent guidelines. the ARS st.aff has already developed model rules for several categories of sources for which rules will be required by EPA at a later date. The staff believes these additional rules constitute reasonably availabie control measures. The AR8 staff has developtd aodel 

## rules for a11 but three of trie 11 categories presently required by EPA: cutback asphalt, insulation of sagnetic wire, and miscellarrcwus refinAry sourtes. A regulation for insulation of magnetic wire is being developed by the South Coast Air Quality hanagesaer.i District, where the only California source in this category is iocated. The rule for cutback asphalt along with rules for miscellaneous refinery sources and eany additional categories of iaportance for California will be developed on a schedule that the AR8 staff believes each district should cowrit itself to (see Table 4- 9). The review of draft QIAPs indicates that most demonstrate the intent to meet EPA and ARB policies on roodel rules, but raost lack detailed regulations or commitments which would clearly define the ruies.

-3-

## i. Vehicular Sources

Control of emissions fron vehicular sources is approached in twoMays. Technical solutions are used to limit the ar,aunt of pollution per vehicie nile traveled and transportation controls arE implersented to rpduce deaendency on -mtor vehicle, and provide mre 

## efficient use of these vehictes. A. Technicai Controls - ove rriew ?Jnst relsic.lr e-mi-;tisun% .iro intr-iduc+'d ira tht as^q.irnt , ir 

### through t*se vehic1A exhaust syste^. The ccr-bustion of .*uei 

## pr-aduces car'.o n scnoxide ECO). nitrocen oxides (YCx), unburned hydr;,ca:

- xns (ui. ), lead partic:,laies, and sul fur ccmounCs. LvaporatirQ losses fr- cm yQhic:e .`Jel s:Fste , :.zs are aiso a r.aJor source of I

~ 

### C emiss acns as are crar.kcase "treathing" eraissiozs. The i.alifor

- nia S:r r-oduces er;issions of CD, ,iOx, and HC hy :s sst io:x or ex':aLst, crankcase, 3r: eva-,

~ orative eaission 

### standards on new wehicles. i.ead ar.d sulfur cc

~ 

### ^=+mds arre 

## controlted 5Y re,uTatinc their conte.n.t in fuel ;yasoline}. I. E,;,issicn Lirzft
- atfiens 

### iatS>e 4-f siY,"i-ts tr'e tr' ° _nd `.'? s

7aslC:ry ^ ,?er

~ 

### ".ar exhaust f-iSS:cn s ~ ^d?rus ::, date. Tahl?

~ -3 s'rr , n~ !s in i",-ssr.•nTr , r C.,r Aa=iairn

St.an- A3rds in Califcrni3 

### c rar^s pe r,r, ; j e iotal

~ ,Z.eC:;cticn 

### 1979 

### Car'.

~ 

### an :3onox 4 de 87".0 3.0 9

~ 

### : lotal hrd-ocar

~ ns 

## E .-' `.A+ ~.~ 

## C .wi 9_SR ff 

### i trL 

### g ti 

### n\1X{ j deJ .~ .JR 'a T i_~:~ ~~ r A.i

. ~ :rJ♦

, 

### Averaye val:]fS t^r ti• 4 :!:fr7a:. '''esn ?S'•d' 5:3^darts.

:^e `c;;c'wi^ q tatie s 7

~ o :aa:`o

~ - r+a a

~ :d 'edera> stX?ri C ar

~ .S .~~i ^ 

### for ;asse:c;;a. _'', :"d c
- ~ 

### nr•av 'L ~~~ 

### Yo':;c'n5 `;}r ?C'•:

- ~ V •

## Table 4-Z 1918 cmission Standards for wE:,+ Passen5er +-ars, Livht and "edium-Duty irvcks 

## by CVS-II iest Procedure grarn per miie 

## Yehicle Test California•' Federal

, 

### ry ~ 

### e 1



### weirht 1b. !?C cc — '{Ox n Z
~ 

### T -- nCx FC AlI 0.41 }.G 1.5 1.5 1S 2.0 lO; 0-3999 0..-1 9.0 ts 2.3 

## L 21 7 *u4v-594g 0 1 .til ? 

## 1.7 18 2.3 4u3
~ 11 0.9 17.0 2.3 t. I 18 2.3 

### *,7se US-I: Tesi ?-ocedure is also discussed in Ghaoter 23. '•5 ~~ 

### Caii*'orn:a

, ~ 

### d n snistrat;

~ 

### •e Cade, T itFe 13. ~'~a 

### p .er 3,

~ 

### c:`c r 15

~ 

### S 9 .S. 1 

### 4.0 `or faur-w'eel drive vehicles zn this 4atec4ry.
=able •

- 

### 3 S,sndar-f5 

### For reavy-L-ity YF^icles* 

### gra,-=s per arake '

~ 

### or-se ^-c% , er hour %Vdcr.c3rWcns 1 0 e+r3x HC'?qoS 

### C; lifor :a 1.S'" Zj 7.5 

## or 25 S of' ' Lere 25 7.3 

### Fgs'rera1 7

, '~ r 

## L ? ?

!1V}r Flarr- .. '

~

rr ,- .c3i!O7 'v'

~ P:e'ii:c':. 9

" M ~ • )` P !r-♦ " •-c r ~.rn' i S

~ 'a '" 1 f

~ .^.tr't i r'F', i ;.<.. ' ,}~' .~r~

- ~

7..Sa
~ .i

~ -i' ~ i+!

... a. ~ a . L

~ ' ..1:, ~~~ai~ Le"e Ti'.ie 13, Ck':a ✓ ter 3, 1e56.5.

M+':a?!'C'Pcles a'".°_ .31So Z:^.'.ro 'sF.'

~ . . ~ '.' ✓ ..as:jrr- •+-

: o.- ?x.'"?:

~ 5' a";y's _ 5>?"d?r
~ S v°
~ ;!"'.^? 'ri' _ . .. .. .'•',r.

~ .t ~ 5.

~ ,3..c ~a.

, ~ ~ r ~ '"":,.

~ ."'

»_ •
-~ 5:.^]:,'t° J

.. ~ '`d. .'' . -' ~~'~ :A" .,. 

# I

## Jisplacpimnt

Model Year (in cubic centimeters) 1978-1979 50 to less than 17C

170 to less than 750 750 or greater 

### Exhaust Emissions (gra^rs C
~ 

### =r i.ilorneter Cart>on Nyd ;ocarbons :'Oonoxirle 

### 7.0 17 17 5.0 17 ly •-G" = UisplacQr , *nL in `ubic centir.yeters.

overall, Caiifornia's standards `or 1977 mdei year ro'or 

### vehicles a^e :ryore stringent than those estabiished oy thQ ,=edera1 Coy£rn:

~ enL `or the other 49 States.

~, ~ sissie.ns sce, -, e in-=3se vehicies in Califorl-ia are 

### aiso centrolied 4, ,`'rcur.'° 7.and —_.atory retrofittin^ ce:`Lain contrsl £o'Ji
~ , 

### --ent. thi5 r£

~~ 

### Zre^

~ 

### eaL P

~ 

### s ' uSUa w l~y r iaanosed w

~Ie~ Ye.~ sicles are *:nitiail ~~ re9rs...r_- t6s cox~in~ `rG~ 

### anfli`

~ 

### °r state or `or£ic ~ 

### .n countv) cr r£- ,re , gistnrnd betause of a change of -wnership. 'ahr

~ 

### uchvuL i?

~ 

### £ state,

~ 

### or exa- ~ 

### 1£. :9

~ 

### o-7C licht-

~ 

### u- . -- r----

~ 

### rehicies

~ 

### ust install !fi0x controi

~ 

### ?":

~ 

### ces

~ 

### ex^zus= ,as

rCr
~ r vdC ;i»

~ s~ar~ . ad.'ar`CP dZ scC'.Tns_'Ct} 

### heiny regii.°r°-d :n;tiali} ~ 

### cr c`an=ing cwnpr5. ~S~e Caiifflr 

### n a t a 

### T itle 13,

~ !av"ter 3,
~ ;.. ~~ nisLra ive Ca ~_, i ~,0~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t'es :,r
~ rti^rs of ~ct ~t~5 i~•~~ ~nC ~~ r :9 1 CC
~ , ^ : ~ ~ coL. "^t;es ( zw'os

~

' in 

### . ;•e J-a ~~f ~ er ~ 'a .] 

### Ou t 

### h 4G

~ S5 ,

!~ ,, ~ '~ 

### ent ra ar. 

### d S a~s~ 

### B ar5ar 

### ! Cour _`as JieL ~~ 

### nt r

~ 

### 3Si^ ~, ~~ 

### 1915 ~ 

### _ ~ a . ~ Sn

~ `'+t' S
~~ '

rut.'Z i'.ent.ral C 

### o ast 3
~~ 'Sir. 

### ) 1~i~3-~ 

### :. ' ~~ :S JSt 

### ins:.ai 4 asL0001'iCx Cpvice 4also vvculw- sa,ark advance disccl^mact, a.:nd8r t..e sz,-e ccn:itions.

r : - a o~~ ss4nr,5 L t"
~ CtS_

~ n ~~~i cLn:z

~ a:e: on a: neqe ve'h 

### i cl

~ es

. 

### Ory.=.;s?C CaSa'S Lr? e^"ILtad :Sg" pY3Ct]r3:iva 'Cc5 i`.r4uy.. ven's

~ 

### '"e cr 

### a n+,CBsn. iti3£sa losses 'ta4`?'
~ 

### e°_`% eli

~ 

### :• 

### a *° :M

~ y 

### Se

~~ 

### ^r. ~ 

### L'£ cra^

~ 

### caSe an ~ 

### extenulr.Y i.^ti Yent 1 ines ~ 

### .: e^L`tvr^i L'
~ e -aS*'s to the Cartur frJr suJS£

~ ip"t

~ • n - 2 =i ~ '~ ''+'!t Crc'.nKLaSf ~ Jus.ir' - C. £ ~ ~

_ p` y .- in .he s_a 

### " e 3 :Olt .w^ a 

### rql 1rj,

~ j^4 - t v A rd P~~ "Eal i

~ ^ i•' , i ` :?~ ,r•S r, S'' ?'S' 2 s. "?f•d ~ ' • 5~ . -a t T a ^.g5' ~^~ ,,. p ~ ^rw4^3C~yuSeS ?rn

~ „ ~ , . T

~ . ~ o+ef

~ r ~~~ , n i. J . y .{ t '? ~ a vya y ^ S .:r x~ , R ^.3: ~ ^~ Cr ~~ _° 3• ~ rP:^'. ~ .edi 3: ?970

, £ ; ~~ ..

.. - % te L~ va:

~ rs

.. 

# _[„

### have been installed on all new light-duty vehicies sold in California. Heavy-duty vehicles have been reguia*_ed since 1973 (see California l'idministrative Code, iitle 13, Chapter 3, Section 2022). Through 1977, the evaporative emission standard was 2 

### gm/tEst as dete r.nined by the carbon trap test procedure. In 1978, hoKever. the standard and the test ProcedurQ xas aitered. (See California Adr,tinistrative Code. Titlp 13, 

### Chapter 3. Sections 1970 and 1976.) A^

~ 

### ore strinapnt test was developed called "Sealed Ncusir,g EvaporatIve Beterr

~ 

### ination" (SNEJ). The new standard is 5cm/test as deter;nir=ed by .he rore stringent SHEC test pr-3cedJre. 

### Both test prncedures are described in the CgdQ of Feder3l iterulations. (40 C=R E5.074-11 to 8.5.074-13 for carYon trap and 40 CFR 86.101 et seq for RSPE4.") 

### Vehicle ^.a.nu,`3cturers are reQuired to corp'sy +rith sever#1 sets of corplenentary reculaticns to ensure that all vehicles sold in California coMly wit': ail applicable e

~~ 

### issions reculations. il?+

~ 

### se relate to certification, asse:r,'aly-:;ne testing, cc_-7zliance testing, durabiiity, and eeaiers!hi{S

i
- 2urveillarce. 

### il;e certif;cat9cn orooran, which applies to natorzi'cles, ignt-cuty ard rzed1u;n-c;,ty vehicles, and heav.+-du*.y engir,es and vehicies, is intended tc ¢nsure that orr;:Qrl; 

### saaintaiasea! Ychicles arc desirned tQ cc-r-gty wi t!; the 

### appiica5le erission st.andards for iheir useful IiYes. f.sSe , ~ 

### biv-1 ine tAst or;;cerures arp intenced to e

~ 

### sure that 

# ri' llfornia ve:'+1C es ar*4 vrt}; , eriy eCL;fp ✓ ed anQ "eot the 

### .appliLable s4a^dards wnAn t::ey ieave :^a a3ctvrr. <.t ti^e pres¢:zt tire, tree asser:bly-line tast ,:ro-_edures a;.Rly 

### only to li4ht-duty and r-ediur-duty vehicles, excludi^g MXr
- c,rcles. Co^x"Jl iance tmsti^C , whic'? is ;fr'or^+ed 3t .1he AR3's

~ Iaaqen-S^it tatsoratory in El xcnte ps desj.^eti 

### :O veri fy thL' ran'3fLctur' 0 _'.*'s ' 3sse.

~ 

### "b'`1 y- i j c:a tesLs or, ,^.assencer cars and liYt:t-duty and :aediL.-

~ 

### -dsty trucks, a^a :o . R1„ ' 9 t9'.t';r the e^issions frven nex omdtiction m_orcycses 

### 3 n t!"-e a'

•3se'^Cn oP +d "* ,

. - 2rcJcle asSe':'

~ 

### .

`1 f- i iY:? t;. 'S t:.T

- o~ 

### gTan. ri^a61y, tte

~ 4:B"S daD'Re•'Shi;? si:rareifla^ce f!'t - ^•""' '.5 t.:e'':vpf..`' i, e

.) °_'!s"s.ita+ "'3t ^o?I k-. ~ '.-,.

~ .v,
~ .r, ✓ a .. c~ } " • p~ I ~"~'

- ~~i~`P ti6hiclAs .~

.!Y D ^ +'sr

~ r ; ~ ~

!':eLi ~~.~t ^ a• ^ .0 addi1st°. ' l

. )1,^.e'.3 ".

~

.E'G"A`a s '

. o~ s~ cCi~:,

^ .'s"Ya%'S:ali l A7tT , iia. .'~r~

idi'yi, ir.:

~ v,

^ „a* :.. n tAst :s `_'^ Lh?;.:Pr 23.

-7

-

### 2. Fuel Content Limitations Lead and sulfur emissions are controlled by limiting their content in fuel. In both cases, refiners of gasoline sold in California have gradually been requiredto reduce the content of these compounds in their product (see California Adninistrative Code, "itle 13, Chapter 3, Section 2253). Phase-down requirements for lead for refiners producing more than 20,000 bbl/day of gasoline are: 

### Maxirsam Lead Conten

- _ 

### of Motor Vehicle Gasol ine 

### Effective Oate 

## (Pool Averace*) Pre-197b January 

## 1971 January 1978 January 1979 January 1980 1.85 g.-,Jgal 1.40 gm/gal 1. 00 c

~ ;,/ g a 1 

### 0.70 g

~ 

### .^Iga I 0.40 rn/gai 'The pool arrerage is the aYeraye of Totar vehicle casoline praduced by a refiner. 

### ihe phase-dorwn requirecents fcr rrefiners prod:;cing less than 20,S.a00 bbl/c'ay are: Maxirm= Lead Cc^tPnt ' o,` 3totor rehicle Oaso7ir:e 

### iEffective Bat.e (Pcol Averag-e•) January 1, 1979 1. 7g?-lga i January 1,

-

1 98#) 1.4 =/ga 1 Since aaotar vehicles are .alvnst entirel.+ res; , o^sibie for aubient lead st-a,ndard violations, t.his

~ ase-do

~ n, a;d•ed by tlae inaDility of catalyst equioped ,w hicles to use leaded ga.soline, is the essence of C'alifor-±ia's stra:eg.r 

### to achieve the n,aticnal at-bient air q;ca; iLy srandard' .`or leaC. 3. Future Technic.al Cortr^is
a. &3issacns S:andarda for "tt,o ide':

~ cies 

### `al:e exhaus: ezissio:9 S

- zat;d3rws ha•ie tonr aSt2's:i 4 S^!'! 

### for 19& 1 znd 

### l , ater :-vo:D; vehicles, a^d are 

### show^ in a'zbles 4-4 and 4-5.

### Table 4-4 1980 and Future California and Federal 

## Exhaust Emission Standards for Passenger Cars. Light and Nedium-Duty Vehicles

grams per mile 

### Mbdel Vehicle Test 

## California *' Federal 

## Year Type: lteiaht (lbs) 414iC+*' ^0 rtOx•*" HC ~ y 3(3x"*" 

### 1980 PC A11 0.39(0.41) 9.0 1.0(1.5) 0.41 7.0

LOT 0-3999 0.39(0.41) 9.0 1.5+ 1.7 18 LDT 4000-5999 0.50(0.50) 9.0 2.0 1.7 18 M®v All 0.90(0.9) 17 2.3 1.7 1;, 1981 PC All 0.39(0.41) 3.4 1.0(1.5) 0.41 3.4

LOT.ltOtl 0-3999 0.39(0.41) 9.0 1.0(1.5) 1.7 18 LOT,?'rY 4000-5999 0.5d(0.50) 9.0 1.5(2.0) 1.7 18 

### MOY 6000blarger 0.60(0.60) 9.3 1 2.0(2.3) 1.7 18 1982 PC All 0.39(0.$1) 7.0 0.4(1.0) 0.41 3.4

LffT,11bY 0-39g9 0.39(0.41) 9.0 1.0(1.5) 1.7 1S LOT.liW 400Q-5999 0.50(0.50) 9.0 1.5(2.0.) 1.7 18 MOV 60W&larger 0.60(0.60) 9.0 2.0(2.3) 1.7 18 1983 P'C All 0.39(0.41) 7.0 0.4(1.0) 0.41 3.4 and LDTXV 0-3999 0.39(0.41) 9.0 0.4(1.0) 1.7 18 latPr LOT.MY 40(10-5999 0.54(0.50) 9.9 1.0(1.5) 1.7 18



### !!4Y 600031arger 0.60(0.60) 9.0 1.5(2.0) 1.0' 18 

## (See California Ad?a'nis`ratire Code, Title 13, C!9apter 3. Sectigns 1 9 -60 and 1960.1.) 'PC - passenger cars 

## LOT - light-dutq trucks (0-6000 lbs. gross vehicle veigri:) !lD+/ - ®edium-duty vehicles (6001-8500 1bs. gr •ass ve!sicie +peight) 

### Federal regulatians covoine LOT's 3nd 'OV's int.o or,e, ex; anCed LOT categary.


### *

- *A sanufactur•rr aaay choose alterna,e s.andards for 1931 and i982 of 0.39 gna/ni for nor.-xaethane 

### hyQr,ycar!>c,^,s (cr 0.41 for :.ot31 YC' ;
- 7.0 gxa/a i for C0; and 0.7 ar. ✓ mi for '* x.

*"Standards in pargnt,' , &sas refer t® :otai hydrr,cartons (KC) eP-isa:-zrs. Cowpl iance with the 1980 s4andard can Lp achieve:i by an a1 

### terna;p non-ssettsar.e hydracarbon s:.andarM of 0.39 =J-i.
*

- * , "Standards in parentheses --Yjs: be rp-t by r",anu.`acturers c°

- C.3s any ;v certify their vehicles fcr 100,OCO' ^iles instead 

### uf ?ro nor-:a3 

### 50.0D0 sxile distance. +2.4 go/mile 

## for a 4 wree3 drive vel,4c;e. 

## 2.0 2.3 2.3 

## 2.3 1.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.0 2.s' 2.3 2.3 i.0 

## 2.3 2.3 

## 2.3



## I

-9-

### Table 4-5 

## Future California Exhaust Emissions Standards

for Heavy-Duty Vehicles grams per brake horseporrer hour Year T06 CO NOx TOG + NOx 1980-82* (1) 1.0 25 - 6.0

or (2) - 25 - 5 1983 b Subsequent 0.5 25 - 4 •5 

## (See California Administrative Code, Titie 13, Chapter 3. Section 1956.6.) 

## *The txo sets of standards for each crodel-year are alternatives. A manufacturer shall have the option for each engine family of showing coaoqliance with either set.



### 14ii 1980 and iater crsdel mtorcycles, with engine 

## displacements grr.ater than 50 cc's, are scheuuled to meet exhaust standards of 5.0 gn/km for T
~ 

### 'rG and 12 

## gq/km for CA under identical national and state standards. In 1982, tl:e T00 standard is scheduled 

## Lo drop to 1.0 gRm/tm in CaTifornia only.As discussed earlier, evaporative e:aissions froraotor vehicies are aiso subject '.o control. A111450 and later moc:el mtor vehicles (excppt ^+otor

### cycles) taust camaply with a 2 qm/test standard as determrined by the SKEB test procedurt. Motorc;/cles 

## mrst couply with standards of 6 yn/test in 1933 and 2 gea/test in 1985 (also SHED). b. fttor Vehicle Inspection Progra » The most icportani follow-uo concept .`or i.r.suring 

## the ef.'ec.iveness of -.otor vehicle mission controls is ths tor Yehicle inspect3an Progra-i EWF?3 kba periodic inspection oe Yehicles fSlr e~ .':ss;cns

### related defects and malfunctions, and tke r^ppair esa 

### those vehicles which do not pass inspection, .s a vital strategy in preserving the effec*i4Qe:es3 of 

### vehicle e?mission control systers. Cai ffornia has a cAntral i;ed Yotcr 't'¢hi:Ia 

### Inspection Prograc on a change o` vehicle cwr.ersRaK 

## basis in ;he South Coast nir 3asin aSG

~ 

## B 1 j_

- P~ - ~

## This pro9ram includes an idle emissions test for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty 

## vehicles. Standards for the test are expected to cause 35% of the "r+orst polluting"; vehicles to fail and require reaair. Only organic gas and carbon eronoxide emissions are measured. Devices whichcontrol N4x emissions are visually and/or function

## ally checked. A loaded mode test may be added in the future to test for all three pollutants. The 1977 Clean Air Act Ae,enda,ent.s require motor 

## vehicle inspection programs in areas unable to 

## dtmonstrate compliance with national asbient air quality standards for oxidant or CO by 1982. The nonattainment plans which need an extension of the attainaent date to 1987 endorse an MYIP as part of 

## their control strategy. IaQleaentation of M1o1P will require action by theLegislature. The Legislature is currently considering adoption of Senate Bill 84 to provide locai offiuls the option to rtquest ieqlementation of a !fU I P by the s ta t.e . 

## C. Control of Emissions From Fleet Yehicies One of the eighteen controi measures required to be considered by Section 108(f)(1)(A) is the conversion of fleet vehicles to alternative fuels (such as alcohol, mcihane, etc.) and engines or to otherwise 

## control emissions `roA fleet vehicles.

- sechnolcgy is becooietg available so that this caeasure =ay be irqlsented in a number of air basins in the future. 

## d. Control of brissions Froa Other liehicular Sources There are a nuaber of classes of vehicies and mobile tquiparr+t pa•ered by Llse internal coebustion enqine 

## that are not controlled, the contribution of these uncontrolled sourcts to total emissions will becoae proportionateiy greater. Off-road recreational 

## vehicles. heavy canstriction eGuipcen;, utili,yeQuipment (suc-h as lawn mo++ers) are Nssi5le candi

## dates for contrbl.
e. Other i

- T+an Licht-Ct,ty Yehicle Retrofi*. Another coeetroi ceasur_ sugrested in ;he C-*A cc::- cerns t.h.e re•.rofit of tseavy-duty vehicles with control devices. - the AR8 lacks statu.or•f au:"or.:y 

## for these progra=. and public ac.ep:ance cf pre- 'larst polluting re attre to tl

~ ieir designed emission leyels. 

## -11-~ F 

## vious retrofit programs indicate little likelihood of acceptance by the leqislature. Jmplementation of suCh prograats requires several years lead time. Fio++ever, some NAPs do contaln this measure as part of their control strategy. The ARS has directed thestaff to Study the measure to determine its applicability as either an attainment or a maintenance eeasure and to determine what emissions reductions, if any, can properly be attributed to this tactic. f. Other Measures 71re ARS has directed the Executive Officer todeteroine which other future vehicle relsted esaission control tactics contained in the NAPs should be accepted for inclusion in the SIP subaission as either attainoent or a+aintenance c,easures. i

- his chapter xill be acended to include a list of the future motor vehicle control tactics that xi;l be pursued by the AkS as soon as possible.



### a



## -12- r



# ~

: