alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE IM ELDO JAIM EZ LLANEZ, AKA Jose R e c inos Jim e ne z , AKA Andre s R odrigue z , Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-71302 Age n c y No. A095-001-858 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B ER ZON, a nd WA TFORD, C i rc uit Judge s . Jose Im e ldo Ja im e z Lla

ne z , a nat ive and c i tiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a sy lum , 

# FIL ED OCT 21 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture (“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Se e Ze haty ev . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Ja im e z Lla

n e z doe s not c onte nd he suffe re d pa st pe rse c ution, but fe ars he will bepe rse c ute d on a c c ount of his sta tus a s a n outside r, or in c onne c tion with thre ats his brother re c e ive d. Substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the B IA’ s finding tha

t Ja im e z Lla

n e z fa ile d to e sta blish a we ll-founde d fe ar of pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. Se eZe tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (pe t itione r’ s “ de s ire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by

c rim ina ls m otiva

te d by the ft or random viole nc e by

ga ng m e m be rs be ars no ne xus to a prote c t e d ground” ); se e also Oc hav ev . IN

S , 254 F.3d 859, 867-68 (9th C ir. 2001) (e vide n c e of sa fe re loc ation unde rm ine d c la im of future fe ar). Thus, Ja i m e z Lla ne z ’ s c la i m

for a sy lum fa ils. B e c a use Ja i m e z Lla

n e z fa ile d to e sta

blish e ligibility

for a s y l um , he ne c e ssa rily c annot m e e t the stric te r sta nda rd of proof to e sta

blish e l igibility

for withholding of rem o v a l. Se eZe haty e , 453 F.3d a t 1190. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use Ja i m e z Lla

n e z fa ile d to show it is m

ore like ly tha n not tha t he would be

1 3 - 7 1 3 0 2 2torture d by

the M e xic an gove rnm e nt, or with its c o nse nt or a c quie sc e nc e . S e e Silay a v . Muk

ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 1 3 0 2 3
No. 11-6790.

#### Antonio Sanchez-Jaimes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 567,

181 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8038.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 348.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Friday, September 11, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held Palisades Institute for Research 
Service, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Doyle, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), 
and through the DDR&E, to the Director Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Militaryd Departments in plannign and managing 
an effective research and development program in the field of electron 
devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5 
U.S.C. App. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), 
and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: July 21, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-19949 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3484 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3484

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize the Secretary 
 of Homeland Security to establish a rotational cybersecurity research 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2019

Mr. Richmond (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Correa, and 
Mr. Langevin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize the Secretary 
 of Homeland Security to establish a rotational cybersecurity research 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Homeland Security 
Rotational Cybersecurity Program Act of 2019'' or the ``DHS Rotational 
Cybersecurity Program Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. HOMELAND SECURITY ROTATIONAL CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH PROGRAM AT 
              THE COAST GUARD ACADEMY.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle E of title VIII of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 411 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 846. ROTATIONAL CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH PROGRAM.

    ``To enhance the Department's cybersecurity capacity, the Secretary 
may establish a rotational research, development, and training program 
to--
            ``(1) detail to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure 
        Security Agency (including the national cybersecurity and 
        communications integration center authorized by section 2209) 
        Coast Guard Academy graduates and faculty; and
            ``(2) detail to the Coast Guard Academy, as faculty, 
        individuals with expertise and experience in cybersecurity who 
        are employed by--
                    ``(A) the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security 
                Agency (including employees from the national 
                cybersecurity and communications integration center);
                    ``(B) the Directorate of Science and Technology; or
                    ``(C) institutions that have been designated by the 
                Department as a Center of Excellence for Cyber Defense, 
                or the equivalent.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
such Act is amended by adding at the of the items relating to such 
subtitle the following:

``Sec. 846. Rotational cybersecurity research program.''.
                                 <all>
```
WILLIAM CHU 

Is posthumously inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this third day of 

June 1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as Deputy Director of Defense Subsistence 

Region Europe – and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DPSC 

– from 1960 to 1982. 

Drawing on his extensive food-management experience, Mr. Chu helped build DSR-Europe from 

scratch. He arranged for payroll, telecommunications, computer support, furniture and hiring of 

new employees. Starting with just two employees, the command ultimately grew to over 900. His 

tireless work significantly improved the reputation of the command, and support to his customers. 

He also improved the European commissary support program, started cold-storage modernization, 

and created an effective field activity to support fresh fruit & vegetable purchases. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/chu.htm 1/21/2016
No. 11-5348.

#### Eric Watkins, Petitioner v. Anthony Haynes, Warden.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 300,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5572.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Letter to PGR Capital LLP




			
	June 1, 2011	 	Exhibit 10.7(b)

 PGR Capital LLP 

Gilmora House 
 57-61 Mortimer Street 

London W1W 8HS, 
 UK 

Attention: Casey Grylls 

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Grylls: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 PGR Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	PGR CAPITAL LLP
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Casey Grylls



			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Casey Grylls
		
	 JM/sr
June 25 I . 2012 . 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

·U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 .. 2029 

·.S~ DearM~ln: 

In accordance with Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act, enclosed for your approval is a revision 

to Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) pertaining to amendments to the Allegheny 

County Health Department (ACHD) Rul~ and Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution Control, 

relating to regulations incorporating New Source Review. The regulations are contained in the 

ACHD Rules and Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution Control Sections 2102.04,2102.06, 

and 2102.08. The SIP revision also includes revisions to related definitions in Section 2101.20. 

This revision is identified as revision 66 for'ACHD's internal tracking. 

The ACHD is a local health agency organized under Local Health Administration Law, Act 315 

of August 24:. 1951, P.L. 1304, as amended, whose powers' and duties include the enforcement of 

laws relating to public health within Allegheny County. The AeHD has an air pollution control 

program that has been approved by DEP in accordance with Section 12 of the Air Pollution 

Control Act. . 

The SIP submittal includ~ one hard copy and one compact disk, consisting of the final 

rulemaking and documentation of the public participation process. I certify that the electronic 

files are exact duplicates of the hard copies. The public comment period for the SIP revision was 

August 10,2011 through September 12,2011, with a public hearing on September. 12, 201 L 

Comments were addressed in a comment and response document~ included in this submittal. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions concerning this SIP 

revision, please contact Joyce E .. Epps, Director of the Bureau of Air Quality, bye-mail at 

jeepps@pa.gov or by telephone at 717.787.9702. You may also contact Mr. James E. 

Thompson, Manager, Air Quality Pro ,CHD, bye .. mail at jthompson@achd.net or by 

telephone at 412.578.8103. 

Enclosure 

Rachel Carson State Office Building I P.O. Box 2063 I Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

717.787.2814 Printed on Recyded fJaper @ www.depweb.pa.gov
No. 11-2.

#### Stryker Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Margaret J. Bausch.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 498,

181 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7909.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 546.
Order entered January 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00078

- CV

IN RE EMEKA ALUDOGBU AND RESTORATIVE HEA LTHCARE, LLC , Relators

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 00112



### O RDER Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relators to b ear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
No. 11-7321.

#### Clifford Scott Eaton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1100, 132 S. Ct. 863,

181 L. Ed. 2d 562,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8920.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*563Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 553.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP7.20. APPENDIX 7.20**

**SUBSISTENCE TYPE OF PACK CODES**

2

APPENDIX 2.20

AP7.20-1

APPENDIX 7.20
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLENDA ESMERALDA HERNANDEZBURUCA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71162

Agency No. A095-210-902

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Glenda Esmeralda Hernandez-Buruca, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying her motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252

and we dismiss Hernandez-Buruca’s petition for review.

FILED

AUG 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71162

Hernandez-Buruca’s petition for review is untimely because she filed it on

April 25, 2011, more than 30 days after the BIA’s decision on March 23, 2011. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995) (the 30-day

filing period for a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional); Magtanong

v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1190, 1191 (9th Cir. 2007) (order) (per curiam) (internal

citation omitted) (“A mandatory and jurisdictional rule cannot be forfeited or

waived, and courts lack the authority to create equitable exceptions to such a

rule.”). We reject Hernandez-Buruca’s contentions that the petition was timely

pursuant to the “constructive receipt” rule or Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 26(a)(3)(A). Thus, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of

jurisdiction.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
No. 10-1150.

#### Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

565 U.S. 1050, 132 S. Ct. 609,

181 L. Ed. 2d 448,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8302.

November 22, 2011.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1229-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of West Virginia, (FEMA-1229-DR), dated July 1, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of West Virginia, is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of July 1, 1998:

    Harrison, Marshall, Ohio, and Wetzel Counties for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-20485 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto
Receivables Trust 2017-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 30, 2018By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and
TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-117-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

July 21, 1998.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in this 
proceeding will be convened on Tuesday, August 18, and Wednesday, 
August 19, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. The settlement conference will be held 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, for the purpose of exploring the 
possible settlement of the above referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Thomas J. Burgess at 208-2058 
or Lorna J. Hadlock at 208-0737.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19964 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
A-A-59483

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3719 STANDARD 14.20 -0.18 -2.15

Tolerance

1 3719A FULL LIMIT 13.40 -0.13 -1.88 -0.80 0.05 0.27 0.86

2

3719B

(removed 

9/7/18)

RED LIMIT 16.04 -0.89 -2.53 1.84 -0.71 -0.38 1.27

3 3719C FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 13.83 -0.07 -1.93 -0.37 0.11 0.22 0.49

4 3719D THIN VIOLET 

LIMIT 15.89 0.02 -2.63 1.69 0.20 -0.48 1.79

5 3719E FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT 12.92 -0.33 -1.92 -1.28 -0.15 0.23 1.30

6 3719F FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 12.39 -0.06 -1.73 -1.81 0.12 0.42 1.90

7

8

9

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 4, 2019

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, MEDIUM WEIGHT, 

POLY/NYLON/SPANDEX

Shade Number BLACK 470 Piece/Roll Number 3719

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 11-5650.

#### Thomas Rea, Petitioner v. Wal-Mart Store 1105.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 807,

181 L. Ed. 2d 518,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8343.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 407, 181 L. Ed. 2d 266, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7313.
No. 10-10972.

#### Albert Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 860, 132 S. Ct. 197,

181 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5879.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 619.
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Roger Dean, Chief Financial Officer of CURO Group Holdings Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








_ /s/ Roger Dean ______________


Roger Dean


Chief Financial Officer


March 13, 2018