alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22685-22686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9830]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Interagency Management Task Force Public Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) will hold public 
meetings of the Interagency Energy Management Task Force (Task Force) 
in 2011. FEMP intends to hold recurring public meetings of the Task 
Force. Interested parties can check http://www.femp.energy.gov/news/events.html for the time, location, agenda, and related materials of 
the meetings. The purpose of the town hall meetings is to provide 
information on current Federal energy management activities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hayes Jones, Federal Energy Management 
Program; EE-2L; 1000 Independence Ave., SW.; Washington, DC 20585; 
(202) 586-8873. More information on DOE's Federal Energy Management 
Program can be found at http://www.femp.energy.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Energy Management Program 
(FEMP), within the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency 
and Renewable Energy, facilitates the Federal Government's 
implementation of sound, cost-effective energy management and 
investment practices to enhance the nation's energy security and 
environmental stewardship. In support of this goal, the FEMP Program 
Manager chairs the Interagency Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force 
was created by the Federal Energy Management Improvement Act of 1988 
(Pub. L. 100-615) to coordinate the activities of the Federal 
Government in promoting energy conservation and the

[[Page 22686]]

efficient use of energy and in informing non-Federal entities of the 
Federal experience in energy conservation. The Task Force is composed 
of Federal energy managers. The purpose of these public Town Hall 
meetings is to present information related to Federal energy management 
and reporting requirements. The meetings may also present an 
opportunity for public comment on activities related to Federal energy 
management. The Task Force establishes working groups to address 
specific technical or programmatic issues and to develop new 
initiatives. It also serves as a forum for sharing lessons learned 
across Federal agencies.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2011.
Jerry Dion,
Supervisor, Federal Market Development, Federal Energy Management 
Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9830 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
cdc.gov/coronavirus

Antigenic cartography 

Natalie J. Thornburg, Ph.D

Lead, respiratory virology

NCIRD

ACIP

September 1, 2022
What is antigenic cartography?

• Visualization method used to determine how closely related 

different viruses are, but not in the context of genetically, but 

antigenically

• Uses a matrix algorithm: matrix completion-multiple dimensional 

scaling algorithm

• Developed for H3N2 influenza viruses using HAI titers

• 2D and 3D maps
How is antigenic cartography done?

Mykytn et al. Science immunology. 2022
What are advantages and disadvantages?
Omicron lineages and amino acid variations in spike 

protein

Tuekprakhon et al. Cell 2422-2433.e13. 2022
Omicron lineage amino acid variations on RBD

Tuekprakhon et al. Cell 2422-2433.e13. 2022
Using convalescent sera from unvaccinated persons, 

antigenic cartography groups BA.1 and BA.2 Omicrons 

distantly from earlier variants

Van der Straten et al. Immunity 2022. 
3D antigenic cartography using BA.1 breakthrough 

sera and mAbs indicate BA.5 most distant from 

ancestral virus

Tuekprakhon et al. Cell 2422-2433.e13. 2022
BA.4/5 is most antigenically distinct variant using 

post-3

rd dose sera in pseudovirus neutralization assays

Wang et al. Nature. 2022
Bootstrapping aggregated antigenic cartography data 

indicates overlap of Omicron variants

Aggregated Omicron neutralization data (last update 2022-05-26) - Google Slides
Conclusions

▪ Antigenic cartography is an analysis method to visually represent how 

antigenically related viruses are to each other

▪ 2 and 3 dimensional antigenic cartography maps cluster Omicron variants 

away from ancestral and earlier variants

▪ Initial examinations of Omicron lineages indicates that BA.4 and BA.5 

viruses may be more antigenically distinct than BA.1 viruses
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 22075 STANDARD 33.99 -4.54 4.63

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number SAGE GREEN 3456 Piece/Roll Number 22075

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT August 12, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED, HIGH TEMPERATURE, 

SIMPLEX, JERSEY MIL-C-81393

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
Exhibit 10.68


 


EXTENSION AND CONVERSION AGREEMENT


 


Made this 30th day of January 2012 (the "Effective
Date") by and between Viral Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Martin Eric Weisberg ("Consultant").


 


WHEREAS Company and Consultant are party to an Amended and
Restated Consulting Agreement dated January 26, 2011 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which Consultant is due certain compensation,
and the parties desire to extend the Agreement through December 31, 2012 and resolve such compensation due.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and lawful consideration
and of the mutual covenants contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived hereunder, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	As of the Effective Date hereof, Consultant is owed a total of $135,000 pursuant to the Agreement
("Fees Due"), as described on the attached Schedule A.



		2.	Consultant and Company hereby agree that the entire Fees Due shall be settled in shares of common stock of the Company ("Shares")
at the price of $0.0195 per share, and Company shall therefore deliver a total of 6,923,070 Shares in full satisfaction of the
Fees Due within 20 business days of execution hereof, provided that these Shares shall be issued in certificates corresponding
to the period when the underlying portion of the Fees Due were earned, and services thereunder provided, as described in Schedule
A.



		3.	The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended until December 31, 2012 as provided in Section 3
therein.



		4.	All other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.-



 


AGREED and entered into as of the date affixed hereof.


COMPANY:


VIRAL GENETICS, INC.




 


By: /s/ Haig Keledjian


Duly Authorized Officer


 


CONSULTANT:


 


/s/ Martin Eric Weisberg


Martin Eric Weisberg
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50238

Summary Calendar

 

GLEN C. JAMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; 

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION;

ALLAN B. POLUNSKY, Chairman; LEPHER JENKINS, TDC

Regional Director; DAYTON J. POPPELL; MARSHALL 

D. HERKLOTZ; JANIE THOMAS; GARY LANG,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CV-210

- - - - - - - - - -

July 11, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glen C. James, #660410, appeals the district court's denial

of his motion for leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint asserting claims of due process violations in placing

him in lockdown and inadequate food and exercise in lockdown in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court denied
James leave to file the complaint in light of a sanction order in

James v. Collins, No. SA-95-CA-1024 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 1996), in

which the district court ordered the clerk of court to refrain

from filing any document submitted by James to the court until

James paid a $50 monetary sanction or obtained written permission

from the court. 

James does not dispute that he failed to pay the $50

monetary sanction. The district court, in denying James' motion

for leave to file the complaint, indicated its willingness to

accept for filing a narrowly-tailored complaint asserting James'

claims of constitutionally inadequate food. James' claims

concern events which occurred on or after January 23, 1996, and,

thus, are not presently barred by the applicable two-year statute

of limitations. Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989);

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.003(a) (West 1996); Burrell

v. Newsome, 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir. 1989). The district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying James' motion for

leave to file his civil rights complaint.

AFFIRMED.
MIL-C-87052

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 17027 STANDARD 96.25 2.03 -9.54

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 17, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, TWILL, POLYESTER

Shade Number WHITE 3006 Piece/Roll Number 17027
```

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003

                                                        /S/    GARY L. CLARK
                                                            Gary L. Clark
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.17 CWT 0.965 $7.8841

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4775 LB 3.5 $8.6713

Class I Price $16.5553

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.16 CWT 0.965 $5.9444

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6073 LB 3.5 $9.1256

Class I Price $15.0700

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.4854

(4) Price change per gallon $0.1277

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0639

Price change per quart $0.0319

Price change per pint $0.0160

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0115

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0096

Price change per half pint $0.0080

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.13

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per quart $0.03

Price adjustment per pint $0.02

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Sept. 4, 2016
FY 23 Produce Audits

DATE CONTRACTOR LOCATION

25-26 October 2022 Cash-Wa Distributing Kearney, NE

29-30 November 2022 United Salad Portland, OR

22-23 January 2023 Segovia’s Distributing Inc El Paso, TX

26-27 January 2023 Brother’s Produce Houston, TX

28 Feb – 1 Mar 2023 Norfolk Banana Distributors, Inc. Norfolk, Va

15-16 March 2023 Robertson Fruit & Produce, Inc. Monroe, LA

28-29 March 2023 DNO Inc. Columbus, OH

11-12 April 2023 Grasmick Produce Co., Inc. Boise, ID

17–18 May 2023 Cash-Wa Distributing Fargo, ND

12-13 June 2023 US Foods Bismarck Bismarck, ND

20–21 June 2023 Upper Valley Produce, LLC. White River Junction, VT

26–27 June 2023 Jo-Ed Produce Cheyenne, WY

28–29 June 2023 FreshPack Produce Denver, CO

18–19 July 2023 Vermilion Valley Produce Co. Morton, IL

8–9 August 2023 KT Produce Lowell, AR

17–18 August 2023 US Foods Anchorage, AK
No. 11-6409.

#### Alfred Caballero, Petitioner v. James D. Hartley, Warden.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,

181 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8235.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL

SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT :

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORS

July 23, 2012

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Ener gy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20024This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Con sulting, Inc.

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
MENU 1 MENU 2 MENU 3 MENU 4

Vegetable Barley Stew Beef Roast with Vegetables Vegetables & Lamb Jalfrazi Chicken Stew

Patriotic Cookie Apple Turnover Banana Caramel Pudding Chocolate Pudding

Cranberries Dried Fruit Mix, 57 g Apple Turnover Wheat Snack Bread

Cinnamon Bun Peanuts, Roasted & Salted Oatmeal Cookie Shortbread Cookie

Beverage, Grape Fig Sandwich Beverage, Lemon Lime Cranberries

Beverage,Tropical Beverage, Orange

MENU 5 MENU 6 MENU 7 MENU 8

SAAG Chole w Lamb Lentil/Channa Del Masala SAAG Chole Chicken & Vegetables

Banana Caramel Pudding Apple Turnover Banana Caramel Pudding Butterscotch Pudding

Oatmeal Cookie Chocolate Nut Raisin Mix Patriotic Cookie Chocolate Nut Raisin Mix

Cinnamon Bun Peanuts, Roasted & Salted Peanuts, Roasted & Salted Dried Fruit Mix, 57 g

Beverage, Grape Beverage, TropicaI Dried Fruit Mix, 57 g Wheat Snack Bread

Beverage, Lemon Lime Beverage, Orange

MENU 9 MENU 10 MENU 11 MENU 12

Lamb & Lentil Stew Beef Stew Oatmeal Almond Cherry Veg Barley w/ Lamb

Chocolate Pudding Oatmeal Cookie Chocolate Pudding Butterscotch Pudding

Wheat Snack Bread Chocolate Nut Raisin Mix Cinnamon Bun Fig Sandwich

French Toast Blueberry Turnover Shortbread Cookie Cranberries

Beverage, Grape Beverage, Tropical Beverage, Lemon Lime Patriotic Cookie

Beverage, Orange

Halal Menus (Revised February 2024)
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.54. APPENDIX 8.54**

**DEFENSE AUTOMATIC ADDRESSING SYSTEM MATERIEL OBLIGATION VALIDATION RESPONSE TRANSACTION[footnoteRef:1]** [1:   Use of revised Materiel Obligation Validation (MOV) temporary suspension procedures for selected activities last reported as not implemented by USMC.  Refer to AMCL 37. ] 

AP3.54-1

1

APPENDIX 3.54

AP8.54-1

APPENDIX 8.54
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 84 ) ll-K - (B ) -7 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:51 AM Sheet 84 of 325P. 2



# n

II-K-(B)-7 2
POTENTIA L IMPACT S O F REVISE D FUE L PRIC E FORECAST S AN D FU ACOS T TEST . Lette r fro mT . Hogan , EE At o R . Short , EPA:SASD . Ma y11 , 1981 . THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D IN DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M II-K-(B)-7 2
No. 10-11224.

#### Leroy Lee Byrd, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1058, 132 S. Ct. 756,

181 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8556.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 485.
(1) Adjusting Price $20.90 CWT

(2) Base Price $20.09 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.81

(4) Price change per gallon $0.07

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.03

Price change per quart $0.02 

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.07

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Mar. 3rd, 2024
FIGURE 3. Percentage of private provider sites participating in a grantee†

immunization information system-- United States and six cities §, 2005

No Report

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%

Source: CY2005 IISAR

†Grantees include 50 states, 

five cities and the District 

of Columbia, funded under 

section 317b of the Public 

Health Service Act.

§Chicago, Illinois (0%-

33%); District of Columbia 

(95%–100%); Houston, 

Texas (34%–66%); New 

York City, New York 

(67%–94%); Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania (95%–100%); 

San Antonio, Texas (95%–

100%).

National Coverage: 44%
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $13.98 CWT 0.965 $13.49

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.1098 LB 3.5 $10.88

Class I Price $24.38

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.89 CWT 0.965 $12.44

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.9838 LB 3.5 $10.44

Class I Price $22.88

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.49

(4) Price change per gallon $0.13

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.06

Price change per quart $0.03

Price change per pint $0.02

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.13

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.06

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.03

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.02

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Apr. 3rd, 2022
(logo)Rialto 

          CAPITAL

 

 

2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of August 1, 2017 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator and Cayman Agent, Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the GS Mortgage Securities Trust2017-GS7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GS7 (GSMS2017-GS7)

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of August 24, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the "ReportingPeriod") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision

 

3.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been afailure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failureand the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2018