alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           42009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    80739
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2250
<INVENTORY>                                     139932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                277790
<PP&E>                                           59058
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  448724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            97055
<BONDS>                                         176086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       91379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    448724
<SALES>                                         125504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                125666
<CGS>                                           109720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   127371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1104)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3738)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-256-001]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 22, 1998, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf), tendered for filing to its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised sheet, bearing a 
proposed effective date of August 1, 1998:

Third Revised Sheet No. 286

    Columbia Gulf states that on June 24, 1998, it filed with the 
Commission revised tariff sheets to implement the Commission's April 
16, 1998 final rule in Docket No. RM96-1-007; Order No. 587-G Standards 
for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. It has come 
to Columbia Gulf's attention that references to certain standards were 
not incorporated as required. Therefore, the instant filing revises 
Sheet No. 286 to incorporate by reference the omitted standards and to 
remove standard 4.3.4 which is no longer applicable.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
affected customers and state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20472 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5836.

#### Alaric F. Simon, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 351,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7045.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 489.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Maria
Trinh, as President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of her knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Maria Trinh
------------------------
Maria Trinh
President, CEO AND CFO
August 9, 2002
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                      Exhibit 27
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   24420
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            28612
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         79710
<PP&E>                                                 1329968
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1494680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   142045
<BONDS>                                                 818627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                             175000
<COMMON>                                                   278
<OTHER-SE>                                              281247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1494680
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        135804
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           117191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          3555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       19128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (4070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              1628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2442)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.09)



        

</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,198-03

EX P ARTE KEYSHA KEYYOR TUGLER, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W16-47527-N( B) IN THE 195T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted robber y and sentenc ed to thi rt y -s ev en y ear s’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed her conviction. Tugler v .State , 05-17-00429- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas J uly 12, 2018) (not d es i gn at ed for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that appellate counsel failed to ad v i se her of her rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle her to relief

. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W .3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court2

is the appropr iate for

um for finding s of fa ct. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d) . The trial court s h al l o rder appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it sha ll determine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applica nt is indi g ent and wa

nts to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent her at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t an d co n cl u sions of law as to whether appellate counsel timely advised Applicant that she had a rig ht to file a pro se p et i t i o n for discretionar y revie w. The trial court shall also deter mine whet h er Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discr etionary

revie w but for appellate counsel’s allege d defic ient perf ormanc e. The trial court may make a ny other finding s and conclusions that it de ems appropr iate in r esponse to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall m ak e findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed fin d ings and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Apr il 1, 2020 Do not publish
ex10-4.htm


 


Exhibit 10.4


 



MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING







This Memorandum of Understanding (this “Memorandum) is made and entered into as of this 20th day of December 2011 by and among EC Development, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Techrescue, LLC, a Oklahoma LLC (“Techrescue”) and made in reference to the fact that Techrescue and EC Development LLC (also an Oklahoma LLC and referred to as the “Premerger LLC”) were each owned by Eugene Estep and Fredrick Combs (who are collectively referred to as the “Owners”) and, in connection with the operations of Techrescue and the Premerger LLC, the Owners caused funds from Techrescue to be used to pay certain payroll expenses of the Premerger LLC.







The Company has acquired the Premerger LLC and desires to confirm the prior facts regarding (1) such advances and (2) the obligations to repay such advances to Techrescue and the parties enter into this Memorandum for purposes of memorializing same.  Therefore, the parties confirm the following:


 



	
1.  

	
The Premerger LLC and Techrescue each confirm that the advances reflected on the books of each company are the true and correct amounts of advances paid by Techrescue to employees and others of the Premerger LLC.








	
2.  

	
The Company did and does assume and agree to repay Techrescue, such advances as shown on the books and records of the Premerger LLC as of August 1, 2010.








	
3.  

	
The parties acknowledge that all amounts represent payments by Techrescue to others (including employees and tax agencies) who were owed such amounts by the Premerger LLC and no amounts represent payments to or from the parties for any other reason.








	
4.  

	
The Company has agreed and will continue to repay the full and exact amounts of such advances as quickly as practical based on cashflow and ability of the Company but such amounts shall not bear interest.












This Memorandum is intended to confirm the past transactions and the prior agreement of repayment terms as agreed upon in principle and evidence the willingness and commitment of the parties to repay such advances.  Each of the undersigned, for and in consideration received in connection with the merger, has executed this Memorandum of Understanding effective as of the merger but signed as of the day and year first above written.








	
EC Development, Inc.

	  	
Techrescue, LLC


	
By:

	 
/s/ Randy Edgerton

	  	
By:

	 
/s/ Eugene Estep


	  	
Randy Edgerton

	  	  	
Eugene Estep, member
No. 11-409.

#### Zhi G. Wang, et al., Petitioners v. City of Pleasanton, California, et al.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 817,

181 L. Ed. 2d 526,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8801.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 666.
No. 11-6357.

#### Marcel Roy Bendshadler, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 556,

181 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8014.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 569.
VERA E. GIANNINI 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of June 1995 

for her extraordinary leadership and support as Associate Director of the Small Business Office - 

and for her continuous outstanding mission support throughout her tenure at DPSC – from 1956 to 

1993. Ms. Giannini’s unparalleled knowledge and effective management earned her a primary 

leadership role within the Defense Logistics Agency and the Defense Department’s small business 

community. She also expertly managed and operated DLA’s largest socio-economic program, and 

was awarded the DLA’s Javits-Wagner-O’Day Program Manager. She took the lead in developing 

and operating the world’s first Business Counseling Center – designed to educate, counsel, and 

assist businesses, especially in adapting their operations to electronic commerce and electronic 

data interchange. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/giannini.htm 1/27/2016
No. 11-7141.

#### Floyd Junior Powell, Petitioner v. Tony A. Keller, et al.

565 U.S. 1106, 132 S. Ct. 1076,

181 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 493.

January 9, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
No. 11-474.

#### Edward N. Fadeley, Petitioner v. Citibank of South Dakota, NA.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1010,

181 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 304.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information obtained from The Corporate
Executive Board Company interim condensed unaudited financial statements as of
and for the three month period ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          28,696
<SECURITIES>                                     1,025
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,987
<PP&E>                                          11,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,172
<SALES>                                         20,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,784
<CGS>                                            8,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,718
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,688
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,688
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
CYBER MERCHANTS EXCHANGE, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Cyber Merchants  Exchange,  Inc. Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB  for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Frank
S. Yuan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
          fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
          results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Frank S. Yuan
     -----------------
         Frank S. Yuan
Chief Financial Officer and Director
November 12, 2003

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyber Merchants Exchange, Inc. and
will be  retained  by  Cyber  Merchants  Exchange,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 94 (Thursday, May 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11223]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8736]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Kandinsky: A Retrospective'' Exhibition

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Kandinsky: A Retrospective,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with a foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Milwaukee Art 
Museum, Milwaukee, WI, from on or about June 5, 2014, until on or about 
September 1, 2014; The Frist Center for the Visual Arts, Nashville, TN, 
from on or about September 26, 2014, until on or about January 4, 2015, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 9, 2014.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-11223 Filed 5-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
No. 11-5393.

#### Jose Savillon-Matute, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 964, 132 S. Ct. 454,

181 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7464.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 119.
No. D-2616.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of J. Gordon Blau.

565 U.S. 1054, 132 S. Ct. 811,

181 L. Ed. 2d 522,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8473.

November 28, 2011.

J. Gordon Blau, of Longwood, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.