alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30115 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

GERALD A. WELLS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 27

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Gerald A. Wells has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Wells h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 30, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30115 Document: 00515180107 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2019No. 19

- 30115

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-30115 Document: 00515180107 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.61 CWT 0.965 $11.2037

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.3208 LB 3.5 $8.1228

Class I Price $19.3265

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.11 CWT 0.965 $9.7562

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.3955 LB 3.5 $8.3843

Class I Price $18.1404

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.1861

(4) Price change per gallon $0.1020

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0510

Price change per quart $0.0255

Price change per pint $0.0127

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0092

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0077

Price change per half pint $0.0064

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.10

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.05

Price adjustment per quart $0.03

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Dec 1, 2019
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION S

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0 8 08

- CR & 01

- 15

- 00809

- C R

Style: Jason Robinson v. The State of Texas

Date motion s filed * : April 4 , 201 6

Type of motion: Third Motion for E xtension of T ime to F ile Appellant ’s Brief

Party filing motion s : Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 4 , 201 6

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due D ate: April 7 , 201 6

Date Requested: May 7 , 201 6 ( 93 days from original due date)

Ordered that motions are :

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: Ma y 9 , 201 6.

 No further extensions of time will be granted

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Because appellant ’s counsel states that she needs additional time to file appellant’s

brief in this appeal since , among several other briefs she ha s been preparing, she had

missed a week of work due to a medical emergency with her husband, her third

extension is granted , but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be

granted given the length of the extension. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38. 6 ( d )

. Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by Ma y 9 , 2016

, the Court may abate this

appeal for a late

- brief hearing. See id. 38.8(b)(2)

.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: April 7, 2016
DLA Information Operations

J6 “How to” Guide

OPR: J6

KBA00036004

How do you allow access to your microphone and webcam in the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure ?

Note: If the appropriate device driver is installed, users should be able to open Teams or Skype and make video calls. 

Most of the UMC devices are not able make video calls in VDI due to not having the proper driver installed on the device

and it not being configured in Citrix Receiver.

UMC device information needed to run MS Teams audio and video: 

• BIOS Version – HP N90 Ver. 01.14, 3/26/2018

• Windows Version – Windows 10 Version 2004 (OS Build 19041.508)

• Citrix Workspace Version – 20.8.0.46

• Webcam Driver Version – HP HD Camera 10.0.17763.20070

• Audio Driver Version – ATIHDWT6.SYS – 10.0.1.0

1. During your initial log in to VDI, you'll be prompted to allow or disallow the use of your microphone or webcam. Click, 

Permit use of these devices. 

2. If you are not prompted for access or are having device issues, click the black drop down tab at the top of your screen.

3. Select Preferences in the Citrix viewer.
4. Click the Connections tab. Under Global Settings click the drop down for Preferred Webcam and select the webcam 

that is connected to the computer - either HP HD Camera or Integrated Webcam. Select Apply. Select OK. 
Microsoft Teams 

1. Click your Teams icon in the upper right hand corner of the screen. Select Settings.

2. Select Devices. Under Camera select Citrix HDX/ Integrated Webcam. 
For additional assistance:

Chat with Amelia

Call Amelia DSN: XX* (312) 850-9990 (*DSN prefix if needed)

Call Amelia Toll Free: (855) 352-0001 (CONUS)

Go to SPOE
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $17.22 CWT 0.965 $16.6173

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0094 LB 3.5 $7.0329

Class I Price $23.6502

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $17.14 CWT 0.965 $16.5401

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0298 LB 3.5 $7.1043

Class I Price $23.6444

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.0058

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0005

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0002

Price change per quart $0.0001

Price change per pint $0.0001

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0000

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0000

Price change per half pint $0.0000

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required this month since the price change per gallon in either direction

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: April 6, 2014
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT EARL EALY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2568

[ October 12, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312008CF000054A

.

Robert E. Ealy, Lowell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, G ROSS and M AY

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-6210.

#### Carlos Flores Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 956, 132 S. Ct. 434,

181 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7177.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 739.
No. 11-6966.

#### Manuel Borja-Vega, aka Samuel Vega, aka Carlos Ortega, aka Miguel Gomez-Borja, aka Andres M. Orrostieta, aka Bertin Aveja Granados, aka Nau Berduzco-Pena, aka Navor Reynosa Vega, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 601,

181 L. Ed. 2d 441,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8254.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 373.
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Covista Communications, Inc. on Form
10-K for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. John Leach, Jr.,
President and CEO of Covista Communications, Inc. certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          Covista Communications, Inc.


Date:     April 16, 2004           By: /s/ A. John Leach, Jr.
                                       ------------------------------
                                       A. John Leach, Jr.
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
Theodore D. Schade

Air Pollution Control Officer 

# Gnpnr BnsIN 

# UNrrrnoAIn Por,r,uTIoN

# Cournol, DISTRICT 157 Short Street, Bishop, 

### California 9351,4-3537

760-872-8211, Fax: 760-872-6109 l|v4ay

### 8,2014
Mr. Kurt Karperos 

### Chiet 

### Air Quality Planning and Science 

### Division California 

### Air Resources Board 1001

## "I" Street Sacramento,

### CA 95814 

# Re: Rule

### Adoption

## - District Rule 701:

### Air Pollution Episode Plan

### for Particulate 

### Matter Dear 

### Mr. Karperos, On 

### behalf of the 

### Governing Board 

### of the Great Basin 

### Unified 

### Air Pollution Control 

### District (District), 

### I am

### transmitting tothe 

### California 

### Air Resources Board the

### Air Pollution Episode Plan

### for Particular Matter (Rule 701), adopted 

### by the 

### District's Governing Board on 

### March 

### 3,2014 (Board Order 

### #140303- 02) Rule 701was adopted after a

### duly-noticed public hearing and 

### opportunity for 

### written and oral 

### public comment. The 

### Declaration of the 

### District's Board Clerk certifying thefacts showing the 

### District's compliance 

### with the 

### notice and 

### public hearing requirements 

### for the adoption 

### of Rule 701 and copies 

### of the 

### Board Order 

### certifying the adopted description 

### revision, areattached. The minutes 

### of the 

### March 3, 2014 

### Goveming Board meeting were 

### recently approved atthe

### May5, 2014 meeting and arealso attached and should be added to the record 

### of proceedings 

### of the adoption 

### of Rule 701. 

### ln order 

### to incorporate the requirements 

### of Rule 701, the 

### District respectfully requests an expeditious 

### review and approval 

### of this 

### rule and 

### transmittal tothe 

### U.S. EPAfor its approval.



### Phill Senior Research 

### & Systems 

### Analyst

Enclosures (8 hardcopies, 4 electronic copies) I

# . Affidavit of Service by the 

### Clerk of the Board 

## 2. GBUAPCD March 

### 3,2014 Staff Report 

### (with attachments) 

# 3. GBUAPCD Board Order 

### No. 140303-02 Page

## I of 2

### Mr. Kurt Kaperos



### Adoption 

### of Rule 701 

### May 

### 8,2014


## 4. Adopted Rule 701

## - Air Pollution Episode Plan

### for Particulate 

### Matter 

## 5. Public Comments and 

### GBUAPCD Responses 

# 6. SIP Completeness

### Checklist 

# 7. California 

### Air Resources Board 

### APCD/AQMD Rule 

### Evaluation Form 

## 8. Adopted March 

### 3,2014 Governing Board 

### Meeting Minutes 

# Cc: (Hardcopy 

### & Electronic Copy) 

### Sylvia Vanderspek, 

### CARB, 

### Chiet 

### Air Quality Planning Branch Webster Tasat, 

### CARB, Manager, Central 

### Valley

### Air Quality Section Kasia 

### Turkiewicz, CARB, 

### Air Resources Engineer, Central 

### Valley

### Air Quality Planning Section 

### (Electronic Copy 

### Only) Peter Westdal, 

### LADWP, Manager 

### of Eastern Sierra 

### Environmental and 

### Aqueduct 

### Reliability David Edwards, 

### LADWP, Deputy 

### CityAttorney

Page2 

## of2
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, POLYESTER/COTTON HERRINGBONE DRESS SHIRT GL/PD 

11-05

Shade Number GRAY 510 Piece/Roll Number 3883

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Rectangular L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* DEcmc*

Standard 3883 -------------------- 65.56 1.53 -4.93

Tolerance

1 3883A FULL BLUE 

LIMIT

-0.72 -0.16 -0.22 0.45

2 3883B BLUE/GREEN 

LIMIT

-1.20 -0.34 -0.14 0.69

3 3883C VIOLET 

LIMIT

-0.19 0.14 0.06 0.21

4 3883D ORANGE 

LIMIT

-0.33 0.05 0.45 0.57

5 3883E YELLOW 

LIMIT

-0.09 -0.19 0.26 0.39

6 3883F THIN LIMIT 0.58 0.07 -0.27 0.40

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015
# Box4_Table 3_Flu
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3337 

To require applications for a health profession opportunity grant under section 

2008 of the Social Security Act to contain evidence of in-demand jobs 

or worker shortages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require applications for a health profession opportunity 

grant under section 2008 of the Social Security Act 

to contain evidence of in-demand jobs or worker shortages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Market Re5 sponse Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3337 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT APPLICATION CONTAIN EVI2 DENCE OF IN-DEMAND JOBS OR WORKER 

3 SHORTAGES. 

4 Section 2008 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1397g) is amended by redesignating subsections (c) and 

6 (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, and inserting 

7 after subsection (b) the following: 

8 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION REQUIREMENT.—An application 

9 for a grant under this section shall contain a description 

10 of the availability and relevance of recent labor market 

11 information and other pertinent evidence of in-demand 

12 jobs or worker shortages.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

14 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

15 on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 13, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-86-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 23, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 20, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheets to become effective July 20, 1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 777
Twenty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 831
Twenty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 832

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed simply to update its Master Receipt/Delivery Point List.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20201 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-6855.

#### Lavan Maurice Walker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,

181 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8147.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
(1) Adjusting Price $20.26 CWT

(2) Base Price $23.10 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($2.84)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.2442)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.1221)

Price change per quart ($0.0610)

Price change per pint ($0.0305)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0229)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0191)

Price change per half pint ($0.0153)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.24)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.12)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.06)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.03)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.02)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.02)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: January 6, 2013
Letter extending Management Agreement with Aspect Capital Limited



 Exhibit 10.9(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 
 Nations House — 8th Floor 
 103 Wigmore Street 

London W1U 1QS, U.K. 
 Attention:
Mr. Anthony Todd 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals  

 Dear
Mr. Todd: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the
address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	 ASPECT CAPITAL LTD.

		
	By:	 	/s/ John Wareham
		 	Print Name: John Wareham, Director

 JM/sr
inuv_ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 


 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 






 


 




  





  











  






 





 


 




  





  











  








 






 


 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  








 






 


 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  








 






 


 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  








 


 






 




  





  











  






 





 


 




  





  











  








 





 



 


 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  








l
Order entered December 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01288-CV

JAY NORDSTROM, Appellant

V.

ROBERT GORDON D/B/A STUTTGART AUTO GROUP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02276-C

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 18, 2014 motion for substitution of counsel. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to substitute Ronald E. Holub and the Law Firm of Ronald E. 

Holub as counsel for appellant in the place of Martin Allen Brown and Ronald Vickery with the 

Law Firm of Basinger Leggett Clemons Bowling & Shore, PLLC.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE