alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Major General Raymond V. Mason 

Major General Raymond V. Mason was inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of 

Fame this twenty ninth day of October 2008 for his extraordinary leadership as DSCP's Commander 

from 2003 through 2005. General Mason was responsible for the end-to-end supply chain, 

leadership, direction and worldwide operational procurement of subsistence, clothing and textiles, 

medical materiel and construction and equipment requirements. These items were in support of the 

U.S. Armed Forces, DoD activities and other Federal Agencies. Under his leadership, DSCP achieved 

unprecedented levels of performance in every measurable category. DSCP increased FY 04 sales 

from $10B to $12B, while reducing the Cost Recovery Plan to an all-time low. He developed process 

changes to handle all surge demands and directed the establishment of several long-term, highvalue contracts for high-priority/high-demand items. Additionally, DSCP increased the body armor 

production base to meet monthly combat requirements and awarded immediate contracts that 

provided 42 thousand sheets of hardened steel for increased armor protection to the forces in Iraq. 

His personal involvement and commitment to supporting national priorities, both at home and 

abroad, was evidenced by his efforts to outfit the Iraqi National Guard with Extreme Cold Weather 

Clothing System parkas and trousers. He also ensured 3.2 million Nerve Agent Antidote Auto 

Injectors were provided to protect warfighters. He accomplished all of this while leading the 

Agency through implementation of the largest Business Systems Modernization transformation 

within DoD. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/Mason.htm 1/21/2016
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Cindy Wang, certify that:





(a) A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities
      and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2017 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the
      “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 21, 2019





By:  /s/ Cindy Wang


Cindy Wang


Group Vice President - Treasury


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust
No. 11-6816.

#### Adrian Perez-Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,

181 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7939.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 247.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June9, 2017, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodianwith respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-GM(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section10.8 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 9,2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2018. 

 

 

/s /Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober 

ExecutiveVice President 

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-6697.

#### Jamar L. Travillion, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,

181 L. Ed. 2d 434,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8274.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 610 Pa. 13, 17 A.3d 1247.
November 5, 2015

Dear Mr. Ryan:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3103). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 11/19/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7536

VICTOR TYRONE BASS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT SMITH; G. BERRY; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-745-5-H) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Tyrone Bass, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Victor Tyrone Bass appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint anddenying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bass v. Smith , No. CA-97-745-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 26 & Oct. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-1490.

#### Diane L. Holbrook, Petitioner v. Castle Key Insurance Company, fka AllState Floridian Insurance Company, et al.

565 U.S. 1074, 132 S. Ct. 800,

181 L. Ed. 2d 511,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8429.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 824, 132 S. Ct. 113, 181 L. Ed. 2d 38, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5603.
No. 11-6363.

#### Jamar Dewayne Greer, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 523,

181 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7811.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*368Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 608.
No. 11-7239.

#### Katina Rochelle Candrick, aka Katina Lofton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 858,

181 L. Ed. 2d 559,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8892.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 404.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3817 STANDARD 39.45 -1.73 12.66

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number OLIVE GREEN Piece/Roll Number 3817

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 25, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature WATERPROOFING BAG FOR USMC 

LOADBEARING EQUIPMENT GL/PD 13-02

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.76 CWT 0.965 $10.3834

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.6719 LB 3.5 $5.8517

Class I Price $16.2351

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.35 CWT 0.965 $10.9528

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.1787 LB 3.5 $7.6255

Class I Price $18.5782

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($2.3432)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.2015)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.1007)

Price change per quart ($0.0504)

Price change per pint ($0.0252)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0181)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0151)

Price change per half pint ($0.0126)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.20)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.10)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.05)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.03)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.02)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Feb. 1, 2015
No. 11-182.

#### Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 1092, 132 S. Ct. 845,

181 L. Ed. 2d 547,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8850.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*548Same case below, 641 F.3d 339.
Exhibit 31.2
 
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
 Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Barbara Duncan, certify that:
 
 1. I have
    reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
    June 28, 2004
 
 /s/ Barbara Duncan
No. 11-283.

#### John Fox, Petitioner v. Joe Wardy, et al.

565 U.S. 945, 132 S. Ct. 430,

181 L. Ed. 2d 262,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7331,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, denied.

Same case below, 318 S.W.3d 449.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3466 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3466

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the authority of 
  the Secretary of the Treasury to rescind identifying numbers of tax 
                           return preparers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2019

   Mr. Estes (for himself and Ms. Sewell of Alabama) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the authority of 
  the Secretary of the Treasury to rescind identifying numbers of tax 
                           return preparers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TREASURY TO 
              RESCIND IDENTIFYING NUMBERS OF TAX RETURN PREPARERS.

    Section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Authority To Rescind Identifying Number of Tax Return 
Preparer.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may rescind an identifying 
        number issued under subsection (a)(4) if--
                    ``(A) after notice and opportunity for a hearing, 
                the preparer is shown to be incompetent or disreputable 
                (as such terms are used in subsection (c) of section 
                330 of title 31, United States Code), and
                    ``(B) rescinding the identifying number would 
                promote compliance with the requirements of this title 
                and effective tax administration.
            ``(2) Records.--If an identifying number is rescinded under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall place in the file in the 
        Office of the Director of Professional Responsibility the 
        opinion of the Secretary with respect to the determination, 
        including--
                    ``(A) a statement of the facts and circumstances 
                relating to the determination, and
                    ``(B) the reasons for the rescission.''.
                                 <all>
```
FIGURE 2. Percentage of public provider sites participating in a grantee†

immunization information system-- United States and six cities §, 2005

No Report

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%

Source: CY2005 IISAR

†Grantees include 50 states, 

five cities and the District 

of Columbia, funded under 

section 317b of the Public 

Health Service Act.

§Chicago, Illinois (34%-

66%); District of Columbia 

(67%–94%); Houston, 

Texas (67%–94%); New 

York City, New York 

(95%–100%); Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania (95%–100%); 

San Antonio, Texas (95%–

100%).

National Coverage: 75%
No. 11-507.

#### Abdul Karim Hassan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1016,

181 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 347.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 10.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**     I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and Director, certifythat: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation,referred to as the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION        November 9, 2007 /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEK     Steven P. Dussek  Chief Executive Officer and Director  (principal executive officer)
30
MAE DEVINCENTIS

is inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of October 

2003 for her continuous outstanding mission support from 1975 through 1998. During her 23 years 

of federal service at the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, Ms. DeVincentis served as a pioneer 

and catalyst of innovative business practices in the areas of contracting and electronic commerce. 

Her hard work and innovative efforts lead directly to the introduction of terms such as “prime 

vendor, DAPA, and commercial distribution” to the DLA vocabulary. Her efforts to redirect DSCP 

business to focus on customer oriented support, cost reductions, and industry/government 

partnerships have left a lasting legacy that guides DSCP’s and DLA’s daily business practices. She 

has proven herself an exceptional leader who works closely with all personnel helping them 

accomplish their individual missions for the good of the organization. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/devincen.htm 1/21/2016