5836 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices 

comment on the development of the 

Plan amendment; 

(8) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment process will rely on 

available inventories of the lands and 

resources as well as data gathered 

during the planning process; 

(9) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment process will follow 

requirements to address Greater SageGrouse habitat and conservation as 

outlined in the National Sage-Grouse 

Habitat Conservation Strategy; 

(10) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment process will use 

Geographic Information Systems and 

incorporate geospatial data to the extent 

practicable and Federal Geographic Data 

Committee standards and other 

applicable BLM data standards will be 

followed; 

(11) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment will incorporate and 

observe the principles of multiple use 

and sustained yield; 

(12) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment process will involve 

consultation with Native American 

tribal governments; 

(13) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment will recognize valid 

existing rights; and 

(14) The Roan Plateau RMP 

Amendment and SEIS will use analysis 

in the Roan Plateau Final EIS to the 

extent possible and practicable. 

You may submit comments on 

relevant issues and planning criteria in 

writing to the BLM at any public 

scoping meeting, or you may submit 

them to the BLM using one of the 

methods listed in the ADDRESSES section 

above. 

The BLM will use the NEPA public 

participation requirements to assist the 

agency in satisfying the public 

involvement requirements under 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 U.S.C. 

470(f)) pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). 

The information about historic and 

cultural resources within the area 

potentially affected by the proposed 

action will assist the BLM in identifying 

and evaluating impacts to such 

resources in the context of both NEPA 

and Section 106 of the NHPA. 

The BLM will consult with Indian 

tribes on a government-to-government 

basis in accordance with Executive 

Order 13175 and other policies. Tribal 

concerns, including impacts on Indian 

trust assets and potential impacts to 

cultural resources, will be given due 

consideration. Federal, state, and local 

agencies, along with tribes and other 

stakeholders that may be interested in, 

or affected by, the proposed action the 

BLM is evaluating, are invited to 

participate in the scoping process and, 

if eligible, may request or be requested 

by the BLM to participate in the 

development of the environmental 

analysis as a cooperating agency. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. The minutes and list of attendees 

for each scoping meeting will be 

available to the public and open for 30 

days after the meeting to any participant 

who wishes to clarify the views he or 

she expressed. The BLM will evaluate 

identified issues to be addressed in the 

plan, and will place them into one of 

three categories: 

1. Issues to be resolved in the plan 

amendment; 

2. Issues to be resolved through policy 

or administrative action; or 

3. Issues beyond the scope of this plan 

amendment. 

The BLM will provide an explanation 

in the Draft Supplemental EIS as to why 

an issue was placed in category two or 

three. The public is also encouraged to 

help identify any management questions 

and concerns that should be addressed 

in the plan. The BLM will work 

collaboratively with interested parties to 

identify the management decisions that 

are best suited to local, regional, and 

national needs and concerns. 

The BLM will use an interdisciplinary 

approach to develop the Roan Plateau 

RMP Amendment in order to consider 

the variety of resource issues and 

concerns identified. Specialists with 

expertise in the following disciplines 

will be involved in the planning 

process: minerals and geology, air 

resources, wildlife and fisheries, 

rangeland management, forestry, 

outdoor recreation, archaeology, 

paleontology, lands and realty, 

hydrology, soils, sociology, and 

economics. 

Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7, 43 CFR 1610.2 

and 43 CFR 1610.5–5. 

John Mehlhoff, 

Acting BLM Colorado State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2013–01698 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

Adjustment of Service Fees for Outer 

Continental Shelf Activities 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management (BOEM), Interior. 

ACTION: Adjustment of Service Fees. 

SUMMARY: This notice informs all 

lessees, operators, permittees, and rightof-way (ROW) holders that certain 

BOEM fees are being adjusted for 

inflation, as provided for in BOEM 

regulations at 30 CFR § 550.125 and 30 

CFR § 556.63. 

DATES: Effective Date: This Adjustment 

of Service Fees becomes effective on 

February 2, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Questions related to the 

calculations underlying the cost 

recovery fee adjustments should be 

directed to: U.S. Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management, Economics Division, 381 

Elden Street, HM 3310, Herndon, 

Virginia 20170. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Meffert, Office of Policy, 

Regulations and Analysis, (703) 787– 

1610 or at Peter.Meffert@BOEM.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulations at 30 CFR § 550.125 and 30 

CFR § 556.63 provide the authority for 

BOEM to adjust a number of its cost 

recovery service fees on an annual basis. 

These fees were last updated in 2008, 

with Federal Register Notice 73 FR 

49943. BOEM is now adjusting various 

cost recovery fees to reflect inflation 

since the last update. 

This notice informs all relevant 

parties that the fees are being adjusted 

in accordance with BOEM regulations at 

30 CFR § 550.125 and 30 CFR § 556.63. 

The proposed 2012 Fee Amount is based 

on the Implicit Price Deflator value of 

6.72 percent; this value is based on 

inflation from 2007 through 2011. 

The inflation rate between any two 

years is calculated as the percentage 

difference between the measure of the 

level of prices for a designated year (e.g., 

2011) and some previous year (e.g., 

2007) of all new, domestically 

produced, final goods and services in 

the economy for the designated year 

(e.g., 2011), as contained in the 

Department of Commerce’s Bureau of 

Economic Analysis (BEA) Table 1.1.9, 

Implicit Price Deflators for Gross 

Domestic Product, available at http:// 

www.bea.gov/national/pdf/dpga.pdf. 

We expect BEA to revise the rate during 

future updates and, as in the last few 

years, we expect revisions to be upward. 

Even if BEA revises the inflation rate, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices 5837 

BOEM will retain the published fee 

schedule until BOEM’s next fee 

recalculation. 

The following table highlights those 

cost recovery fees that are affected by 

this notice: 

Plan/permit action 2008 fee amount Citation 2012 fee amount 

Conservation Information Document .......................... $25,629 .......................................... § 550.296(a) $27,348. 

Designation of Operator (change of) .......................... $164 ............................................... § 550.143(d) $175. 

Development and Production Plan (DPP) or Development Operations Coordination Document 

(DOCD).

$3,971 for each well proposed; no 

fee for revisions.

§ 550.24 $4,238 for each well proposed; no 

fee for revisions. 

Non-Required Document Filing Fee ........................... $27 ................................................. § 556.63 $29. 

Exploration Plan (EP) ................................................. $3,442 for each surface location; 

no fee for revisions.

§ 550.211(d) $3,673 for each surface location; 

no fee for revisions. 

Record Title/Operating Rights (Transfer) ................... $186 ............................................... § 556.63 $198. 

Right-of-Use and Easement (RUE) for State lessee $2,569 ............................................ § 550.165 $2,742. 

Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331–1356 (2002). 

Dated: January 18, 2013. 

Tommy P. Beaudreau, 

Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2013–01671 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Cancellation of Environmental Impact 

Statement/Environmental Impact 

Report on the Sacramento River Water 

Reliability Study, California 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation 

and the Placer County Water Agency are 

canceling plans to continue work on a 

joint environmental impact statement/ 

environmental impact report (EIS/EIR) 

on implementing the Sacramento River 

Water Reliability Study. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Sharon McHale, Bureau of Reclamation, 

at (916) 989–5086. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Sacramento River Water Reliability 

Study (SRWRS) was a water supply plan 

consistent with the Water Forum 

Agreement (April 24, 2000) objectives of 

pursuing a Sacramento River diversion 

to meet water supply needs of the 

Placer-Sacramento region and 

promoting ecosystem preservation along 

the lower American River. The reason 

for canceling is that the non-federal 

sponsor, Placer County Water Agency, 

does not have the capital improvement 

funding to construct a project due to the 

decline in the regional and statewide 

economy. 

The SRWRS cost-sharing partners had 

identified their long-term needs for 

additional water supplies to meet 

growing water supply demands and 

reliability objectives in their respective 

service areas. Placer County Water 

Agency, Sacramento Suburban Water 

District, and the cities of Roseville, and 

Sacramento were the cost-sharing 

partners. 

Reclamation published a notice of 

intent to prepare the EIS/EIR on July 30, 

2003 (68 FR 44811). 

Dated: December 11, 2012. 

Anastasia T. Leigh, 

Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific 

Region. 

[FR Doc. 2013–01662 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Porter, Civil Action No. 

4:09–cv–170–SEB–DML, was lodged 

with the United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Indiana, New 

Albany Division, on January 18, 2013. 

This proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a complaint filed by the 

United States against Wesley Porter, 

Wes Porter Development Company, 

LLC, Temple and Temple Excavating 

and Paving, Inc., and Robert Jason 

Shumate, pursuant to Sections 309 and 

404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1319 and 1344, to obtain injunctive 

relief from the Defendants for violating 

the Clean Water Act by discharging 

pollutants without a permit into waters 

of the United States. The proposed 

Consent Decree resolves these 

allegations by requiring the Defendants 

to restore the impacted areas and/or to 

perform mitigation. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

Notice. Please address comments to 

Perry M. Rosen, United States 

Department of Justice, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044, and refer 

to United States v. Porter, DJ # 90–5–1– 

1–18341. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the Southern 

District of Indiana, 121 West Spring 

Street, New Albany, IN 47150. In 

addition, the proposed Consent Decree 

may be examined electronically at 

http://www.justice.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. 

Cherie L. Rogers, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Defense Section, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–01633 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

Notice of Information Collection 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration (NASA). 

NOTICE: (12–004). 

ACTION: Notice of information collection. 

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to take this opportunity to 

comment on proposed and/or 

continuing information collections, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). 

DATES: All comments should be 

submitted within 60 calendar days from 

the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: All comments should be 

addressed to Ms. Frances Teel, National 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with