alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          50,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,067,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,336,671
<PP&E>                                       5,459,212
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,289,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,842,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,480,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,424,336
<OTHER-SE>                                   (188,092)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,842,536
<SALES>                                      3,231,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,231,053
<CGS>                                        2,582,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,582,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               305,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                278,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            211,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   211,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
No. 11-6130.

#### Brian Kim, Petitioner v. Lydia C. Hense, Warden.

565 U.S. 985, 132 S. Ct. 515,

181 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7714.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
(1) Adjusting Price $16.78 CWT

(2) Base Price $18.63 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($1.85)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.1591)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0795)

Price change per quart ($0.0398)

Price change per pint ($0.0199)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0149)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0124)

Price change per half pint ($0.0099)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.16)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.08)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.04)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.02)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: April 2, 2017
<PAGE>



                                                             EXHIBIT 21
                                                             ----------

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                     ---------------------------

   The following are the subsidiaries of the Company.  All subsidiaries
are wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, unless
otherwise noted.

Entity
Jurisdiction

Howe Furniture Corporation
New York
     Johnson Industries, Inc.
     Illinois
     Howe Europe a/s
     Denmark

Falcon Products (Shenzen) Limited
The Peoples' Republic of China

Falcon Holdings, Inc.
Missouri

Falcon Mimon a/s (87.4% ownership)
Czech Republic

Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.
Delaware

     Sellers & Josephson, Inc.
     New Jersey

     Shelby FSC Corporation
     U.S. Virgin Islands

     Madison Furniture Industries, Inc.
     Mississippi

     Thonet International (UK) Limited
     England

     Industrial Mueblera Shelby Williams, S.A. de  C.V.
     Mexico

Falcon De Juarez, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico

     Fundicianes Tecnicas, S.A.
     Mexico

Falcon De Baja California, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
No. 11-6311.

#### Marie Assa’ad-Faltas, Petitioner v. City of Columbia, South Carolina.

565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 582,

181 L. Ed. 2d 428,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8195.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40909-40910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1230-DR]


Iowa; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Iowa, (FEMA-1230-DR), dated July 2, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Iowa, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 
2, 1998:

    Allamakee and Harrison Counties for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for Public Assistance).
    Benton, Black Hawk, Buchanan, Butler, Calhoun, Clarke, Crawford, 
Davis, Fayette, Jefferson, Linn, Madison, Mahaska, Monona, Ringgold, 
Sac, Story, Warren, and Winneshiek for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing

[[Page 40910]]

Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-20484 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### February 3, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

LARRY ALLEN CHIEFLY, Petitioner - Appellant, No. 09-6215 v. (W.D. Oklahoma) WARDEN PROVINCE, Respondent - Appellee. (D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00147-M)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before HARTZ , ANDERSON , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges.
Larry Chiefly seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (requiring COA to appeal denial of § 2254 application). The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denied the application on the ground that it was untimely. See id. § 2244(d). We deny the application for a COA and dismiss the appeal. A COA will issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). This standard requires “a demonstration that . . . includes showing that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve-2- encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). In other words, an applicant must show that the district court’s resolution of the constitutional claim was either “debatable or wrong.” Id . If the application was denied on procedural grounds, the applicant faces a double hurdle. Not only must the applicant make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, but he must also show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable . . . whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. “Where a plain procedural bar is present and the district court is correct to invoke it to dispose of the case, a reasonable jurist could not conclude either that the district court erred in dismissing the petition or that the petitioner should be allowed to proceed further.” Id. In this case no reasonable jurist could debate the correctness of the district court’s determination that Mr. Chiefly’s application under § 2254 was untimely, as explained in the excellent report and recommendation by the magistrate judge. Indeed, in his brief before this court, Mr. Chiefly does not dispute that § 2244(d) bars his claim. Rather, he challenges the constitutionality of that statutory provision, at least as applied to his claim. But he did not raise that constitutional challenge in district court; so it is not properly before us. See Hammon v. Ward, 466 F.3d 919, 926 n.8 (10th Cir. 2006).-3- Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Chiefly’s application for a COA and DISMISS the appeal.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge
ELEANOR DIERS 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twentieth day of January 

1999 for her extraordinary leadership and support as an Inventory Management Specialist in a 

Commodity Business Unit and for her continuous outstanding mission support throughout her 

tenure at DISC from 1965 to 1995. Ms. Diers consistently demonstrated leadership and 

motivational skills, innovation, intelligence and an unparalleled work ethic. She has always 

exhibited resourcefulness and determination in developing a team-based philosophy for cradle-tograve management. Her willingness to share information and train associates was instrumental in 

decreasing backorders and improving overall supply availability. Also during her career, she 

accepted a challenging assignment working for the Army Materiel Command in Long Binh, Vietnam. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/diers.htm 1/21/2016
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015

Fabric Nomenclature 100% POLYESTER ECWCS, UNDERSHIRT, LIGHTWEIGHT COLD 

WEATHER GL/PD 06-01

Shade Number DESERT SAND 503 Piece/Roll Number 3885

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Rectangular L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* DEcmc*

Standard 3885 -------------------- 67.52 2.36 11.33

Tolerance

1 3885A THIN VIOLET 

LIMIT

0.75 0.24 -0.97 1.00

2 3885B EXTREME 

RED LIMIT

-0.24 1.00 0.61 1.37

3 3885C FULL BLUE 

LIMIT

-1.13 -0.01 -0.61 0.67

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
# PV LSN REQUEST FORM
No. 10-11177.

#### Seneca Allen, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 871, 132 S. Ct. 224,

181 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6722.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 399 Ill. App. 3d 1218, 371 Ill. Dec. 741, 990 N.E.2d 929.
OSI-12.31.11_EX10.47






Exhibit 10.47


David Berg
        
OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE INTERNATIONAL®
Amendment To Amended and Restated 
Officer Employment Agreement


THIS AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”)  is entered into by and among OS MANAGMENT, INC., a Florida corporation (the “Employer”),  OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE INTERNATIONAL, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (the “Company”),   and DAVID BERG (the “Employee”) to be effective for all purposes as of January 1, 2012.


WHEREAS, Employer employs Employee and leases Employee to the Company as President of the Company pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Officer Employment Agreement dated effective September 12, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into this Amendment in order to change the Employment Agreement to reflect that the Employee has been promoted to Executive Vice President and President of the Company.


NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, for good consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.Recitals. The parties acknowledge and agree that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.


2.Change of Employee's Title. The parties acknowledge and agree that all references in the Employment Agreement to the Employee being employed as President of the Company are hereby amended to state that the Employee is employed as Executive Vice President and President of the Company effective January 1, 2012.


3.Ratification. All other terms of the Employment Agreement as amended hereby are hereby ratified and confirmed by each party. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as set forth above.	
									
	 
	 
	 
	“EMPLOYEE”
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	/s/ David Berg
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	DAVID BERG
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	“COMPANY”
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Attest:
	 
	OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE INTERNATIONAL,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	L.P., a Georgia limited partnership
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	 
	OSI International, LLC, a Florida limited
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	liability company and its general partner
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Kelly Lefferts
	 
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Joseph J. Kadow
	 
	 

	 
	Kelly Lefferts, Assistant Secretary
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Joseph J. Kadow, Executive Vice President




1 of 2











	
									
	 
	 
	 
	“EMPLOYER”
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Attest:
	 
	OS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	a Florida corporation
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Kelly Lefferts
	 
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Joseph J. Kadow
	 
	 

	 
	Kelly Lefferts, Assistant Secretary
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Joseph J. Kadow, Chief Legal Officer


























































































2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Wesley Whiting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Dynadapt  Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of January 31, 2003; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  December 9, 2004


/s/Wesley Whiting
- -----------------------
Wesley Whiting,
President
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3947 STANDARD 47.30 0.93 12.85

Tolerance

1

3947A 

(removed 

8/27/18)

THIN RED LIMIT 49.39 1.99 13.08 2.09 1.06 0.23 1.68

2 3947B BLUE LIMIT 46.98 1.18 12.14 -0.32 0.25 -0.71 0.67

3 3947C FULL RED 

LIMIT 46.86 1.66 12.82 -0.44 0.73 -0.03 0.96

4 3947D VIOLET LIMIT 47.50 1.63 12.16 0.20 0.70 -0.69 1.09

5 3947E FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 45.95 1.34 13.09 -1.35 0.41 0.24 0.84

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number TAN 499 Piece/Roll Number 3947

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT January 8, 2019

Fabric Nomenclature T SHIRT, MOISTURE WICKING, ARMY A-A-59791
# OAR Priorities & Outlook Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Meeting Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation January 8, 2009

1

2 

## • • • 

## Overview CAIR Update • NO2 NAAQS Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze PM2.5 designations

1

## Clean Air Interstate Rule Vacatur Reversed, Rule Remanded

• U.S. Court of Appeals (D .C. Circuit) Decision rendered December 23rd • Remand without vacatur for “EPA to conduct further proceedings consistent wit h our prior opinion . . .” • Focused on preservation of “environmental values” Vacatur “would sacrifice clear benefits to public health and environment (Justice Rogers, concurring) • No particular schedule, but no indefinite stay 3

4 

# NO2 NAAQS • • • completed during 2008. • • and letters. • 2010. Lead NAAQs finalized Oc tober 25, 2008, NO2 next NAAQS in a world of “all NAAQs, all the time.” October 1996, EPA decided not to revise previous primary or secondary NAAQ s; standard left at 53 ppb (100ug/m3) annual ar ithmetic average. Integrated Science Asse ssment (ISA) and Risk and Exposure Assessment (REA) for N02 primary NAAQs CASAC meeting on final REA December 10, 2008 EPA working on ANPR for NO 2 NAAQs consistent with NAAQs process outlined in De puty Administrator memos Proposed rule June 26, 2009; Final rule January 22,

2

## Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze SIPs Ozone • 26 SIPs with attainment demonst rations due in June 2007 – 22 SIPs submitted • EPA is coming to closure on ozone attainment demonstrations which have been submitted. • Notice to those states where it is believed the demonstrations are not approvable -- EPA will take action on proposing a disapproval PM2.5 – 53 SIPs with attainment demonstra tions due in April 2008 – 20 SIPs have been submitted Regional Haze

– 53 SIPs due December 2007 – 14 final SIPs submitted to date

– 11 SIPs have been submitt ed from the CAIR states

– EPA was sued in Oct. 2008 compelling us to make findings of failure to submit for the late SIPs 5

6 

## 24-Hour PM2.5 Designations Timeline Dec. 18, 2008 Final Desi l April 2009 (no later than effective date) Effective Date of Fi April 2009 211 counties designated Nonattainment gnations FR notice published January 2009 States can submit complete, quality By February 20, 2009 assured, certified 2008 data Supplementa Amendments FR Notice nal Designations (90 days after FR publication) Milestone Approximate Date

3

# Appendix Appendix

. . . as suggested by Rob Brenner. . . . as suggested by Rob Brenner.

4

## With only 12 With only 12 1⁄2 days left . . . days left . . .

. . . and since I . . . and since I ’ m not upside down in my m not upside down in my mortgage . . . mortgage . . .

5

## . . . at least I don . . . at least I don ’ t think I am . . . t think I am . . .



## Presenting . . . Bob Meyers Presenting . . . Bob Meyers ’ Clean Air Clean Air



# • Prophecy Prophecy 

# • Predictions Predictions & 

# • Peculiarities Peculiarities

6

# Why History Might Repeat Itself Why History Might Repeat Itself

Why History Might Not . . . Why History Might Not . . .

7
MAJOR GENERAL LEO J. PIGATY

UNITED STATES ARMY 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twelfth day of December 

1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as DISC’s 17th Commander from June 1987 to 

August 1989. General Pigaty is a leader who set improvement goals and provided recognition to 

those who helped reach those goals. Through his dynamic leadership, DISC has excelled in the 

fields of Procurement, Supply, Automation, Technical Operations, Total Quality Management and 

people programs. He provided the motivation and impetus that resulted in dramatic improvements 

in center performance indicators and in quality of life for the associates of DISC. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/pigaty.htm 1/27/2016