Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 1998 / Notices 40101

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR

27562, May 19, 1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides angular resolution of 0.02

degree with significant throughput. The

Brookhaven National Laboratory

advised July 2, 1998 that (1) this

capability is pertinent to the applicant’s

intended purpose and (2) it knows of no

domestic instrument or apparatus of

equivalent scientific value to the foreign

instrument for the applicant’s intended

use.

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19902 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of California, Davis; Notice

of Decision on Application for DutyFree Entry of Scientific Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC.

Docket Number: 98–026. Applicant:

University of California, Davis, Davis,

CA 95616. Instrument: Optical Imaging

System, Model ORA 2001.

Manufacturer: Optical Imaging, United

Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 63

FR 31737, June 10, 1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides ability to perform optical

imaging to map brain activity in

laboratory animals. The National

Institutes of Health advises in its

memorandum dated June 8, 1998 that

(1) this capability is pertinent to the

applicant’s intended purpose and (2) it

knows of no domestic instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument for the

applicant’s intended use.

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19903 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of California, San Diego;

Notice of Decision on Application for

Duty-Free Entry of Scientific

Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC.

Docket Number: 98–029. Applicant:

University of California, San Diego, San

Diego, CA 92121. Instrument: Wave

Measurement Equipment. Manufacturer:

Datawell bv, The Netherlands. Intended

Use: See notice at 63 FR 31737, June 10,

1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides: (1) more reliable wave

direction estimates at frequencies under

1.0 Hz and over 3.0 Hz with less

variability within the range, and (2)

better wave spread estimates than

comparable domestic equipment. Two

domestic manufacturers of similar

equipment advised April 23, 1997 that

(1) these capabilities are pertinent to the

applicant’s intended purpose and (2)

they know of no domestic instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument for the

applicant’s intended use (comparable

case).

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19905 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and

Technology

Feedback Forms for WebMetrics

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Department of

Commerce, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burden, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on

proposed and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506

(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before September 25,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Direct written comment to

Linda Engelmeier, Departmental Forms

Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the information collection

instrument(s) and instructions should

be directed to Sharon Laskowski,

National Institute of Standards and

Technology (NIST), Building 225, Room

A216, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

This submission under the Paperwork

Reduction Act represents a request for a

new collection by NIST. The NIST

WebMetrics Tool Suite contains rapid,

remote, and automated tools to help in

producing usable web sites. The NIST

WebMetrics Tool Suite consists of three

tools: the Static Analyzer Tool

(WebSAT), the Category Analysis Tool

(WebCAT), and the Visual Instrumenter

Tool (WebVIP).

WebSAT checks the Hypertext

Markup Language (HTML) of a web page

against numerous usability guidelines.

The output from WebSAT consists of

identification of potential usability

problems which should be investigated

further through user testing.

WebCAT lets the usability engineer

quickly construct and conduct a simple

category analysis across the web.

WebVIP lets the usability engineer

rapidly instrument a web site for local

or remote testing by employing visual

instrumenting as well as automated

techniques.

Users of the NIST WebMetrics tools

may provide NIST with comments on