alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Maria
Trinh, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Maria Trinh
---------------------------
Maria Trinh
President and CFO
August 14, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20858]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P]

Notice for Publication; AA-8096-03 Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that the decision to issue conveyance (DIC) to Chugach 
Alaska Corporation, notice of which was published in the Federal 
Register on June 24, 1998, is modified because of a change in the 
wording of an easement.
    A notice of the modified DIC will be published once a week, for 
four (4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
modified DIC may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of 
the Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599.
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government, or regional 
corporation, shall have until September 4, 1998 to file an appeal on 
the issue in the modified DIC. However, parties receiving service by 
certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an 
appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau of Land Management at the 
address identified above, where the requirements for filing an appeal 
may be obtained. Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with 
the requirements in 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.
    Except as modified, the decision, notice of which was given June 
24, 1998, is final.
Chris Sitbon,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 98-20858 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
```
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and Director, certifythat: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation, referred to as the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION       May 10, 2007 /S/ STEVEN P. DUSSEK Steven P. Dussek    Chief Executive Officer and Director    (principal executive officer)
(1) Adjusting Price $15.49 CWT

(2) Base Price $16.09 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.60)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0516)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0258)

Price change per quart ($0.0129)

Price change per pint ($0.0064)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0048)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0040)

Price change per half pint ($0.0032)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.05)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.03)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Feb. 4, 2018
Letter extending Management Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6(c) 

June 1, 2011 
 Campbell & Company, Inc. 

2850 Quarry Lake Drive 
 Baltimore, MD 21209 

Attn: Ms. Theresa Becks 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals  

 Dear Ms. Becks:

 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Potomac Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302.

 Very truly yours, 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas P. Lloyd

		 	Print Name: Thomas P. Lloyd
		
		 	JM/sr
# #/063

Mr. Roger Fones Transportation, Energy and Agriculture U.S. Department ofJustice 325 7th Street, NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20530
Dear Mr. Fones: The Department ofEnergy (DOE or Department) is required to administer an energy conservation program for consumer products, including energy conservation standards. In determining iffurther standards are warranted, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6291 et seq., as amended, directs DOE to weigh thebenefits and burdens ofa standard, including a determination bythe Attorney General on the extent the standard would lessen competition.
OnNovember 9 and 10, 1998, DOE held aworkshop regarding energy conservation standards for water heaters. Intheir comments, the American Gas Association (AGA) asked ifDOE is obligated to evaluate what impact the establishment ofaminimum efficiency requirement on water heaters could have on the lessening ofcompetition among energy suppliers.
DOE has completed apreliminary analysis ofshipments for electric and gaswater heaters for three standards levels. Under certain standards scenarios, the analysis forecasts amarket shift from gas to electric water heaters, thereby affecting themarket share between gas and electric water heaters. AGA is concerned this shift will affect competition between the gas and electric utilityindustries and asks DOE to consider those impacts.
In its decision making process, DOE considers any fuel shifting that mayresult from a standard. Wehave not considered any effects a standard mayhave on competition between the gas and electric utility industries or within either the gas or electric utility industries. The Department would appreciate your view as to whether the "lessening ofcompetition" language in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(v), applies to energy suppliers. Iwould appreciate your response byJune 15, 1999.
Ifyou have any questions, please call Mr. Terry Logee ofmy staffat 202-586-1689. Sincerely,

Mark Ginsberg Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Building Technology, State

and Community Programs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, by and amongCITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator andDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-B1 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       A reviewof the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-7099.

#### Dorminic M. Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 827,

181 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8760.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.34


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. : 2011JIYINDAIZIDI11100846


 


Borrower
: Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd.


Lender :
CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


Signing
Date : December 14, 2011


Loan Amount
: RMB50,000,000


 


Length of
maturity : From December 14, 2011 to December 14, 2012


Use of Loan
: Vehicle Purchase


Loan Interest : 8.528%


Date of
Draft :December 14, 2011


Withdrawal
Amount : RMB50,000,000


Payment
Method : The principal shall be fully repaid with interest at the maturity date of the loan.


Repayment
Date :December 14, 2012


 


Loan Guarantee : Mortgage Pledge
Guarantee


- Hebei Chuangjie Trading Co., Ltd entered
into The Maximum Pledge Contract with the lender, with the contract no. 2011JIYINZUIQUANZHIDI11140562.
(1) Adjusting Price $17.69 CWT

(2) Base Price $17.38 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.31

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0267

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0133

Price change per quart $0.0067

Price change per pint $0.0033

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0025

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0021

Price change per half pint $0.0017

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Nov. 1, 2015
No. 10-10397.

#### Calvin Effron, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1074, 132 S. Ct. 801,

181 L. Ed. 2d 512,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8461.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 835, 132 S. Ct. 139, 181 L. Ed. 2d 59, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5402.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001067173
<NAME>    SPG Realty Consultants, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          4,191
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,947<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F2>
<PP&E>                                          7,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 43,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F2>
<BONDS>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   43,694
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,920
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (649)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.37)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>The Registrant does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3>Includes limited partners' interest in the SRC Operating Partnership of
$5,901.

</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.18

 

English Summary of the Equity Transfer Agreement between Beijing Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited and Ms. Ying Lu dated June 19, 2011

 

On June 19, 2011, Beijing Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited (the “Syswin Xing Ye”) enters into an equity transfer agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ms. Ying Lu (“Ying Lu”) to acquire the equity interest of the Chengdu Branch (“Chengdu Branch”) of Shenzhen Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited (“Shenzhen Syswin”), a limited liability company incorporated in Shenzhen, which provides real estate agency services.

 

As of the date of the Agreement, Syswin Xing Ye and Ying Lu respectively holds 92% and 8% equity interest in Shenzhen Syswin, which has established the Chengdu Branch.

 

Transfer

 

Syswin Xing Ye and Ying Lu agree that 100% equity interest in the Chengdu Branch shall be transferred from Shenzhen Syswin to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Syswin Xing Ye(the “Transfer”).

 

Purchase Price

 

The aggregate purchase price of 100% equity interest in the Chengdu Branch shall be RMB32 million. Since Syswin Xing Ye and Ying Lu holds 92% and 8% of Shenzhen Syswin, respectively, the purchase price to be paid to Ying Lu for the Transfer shall be RMB2.56 million (the “Purchase Price”).

 

In consideration of the Purchase Price, Ying Lu shall transfer to the wholly-owned subsidiary of Syswin Xing Ye: (i) the managing rights and all future income and benefits in the Chengdu Branch; (ii) all assets and liabilities of the Chengdu Branch as of the date the Agreement becomes effective (the “Effective Date”); and (iii) existing sales agency and consulting agreements.

 

Payment Schedule

 

Syswin Xing Ye shall pay the Purchase Price to Ying Lu within three days after the Effective Date.

 

Dividend Distribution and Asset Disposal

 

Upon completion of the Transfer, Ying Lu may not participate in the dividend distribution of the Chengdu Branch after February 13, 2011.
No. 11-5042.

#### Michael J. Modena, Petitioner v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al.

565 U.S. 934, 132 S. Ct. 381,

181 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6559.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-6766.

#### Moises Meraz-Camacho, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 824,

181 L. Ed. 2d 534,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8745.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 558.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 14, 2015 N o. 04 - 15 - 00194 - CV Stacey SCOTT , Appellant v. Larry FURROW and Keller Williams Legacy Group,

Appellee s From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13 - 1125 - CV - A Honorable W.C. Kirkenda ll, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This court inadvertently assigned two appeal numbers to the notice of appeal filed with the Guadalupe District Court C lerk on March 30, 2015, in Cause Number 13 - 1125 - CV - A . It is therefore ORDERED that appeal number 04 - 15 - 00194 - CV will be treated as a closed case for administrative purposes. Appeal number 04 - 15 - 00074 - CV will be retained on the docket as the appeal from trial court cause number 13 - 1125 - CV - A .

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand an d affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of May, 2015 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
No. 11-5021.

#### Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 259,

181 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5267.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.

Same case below, 241 P.3d 214.
No. 11-6393.

#### Leon Fowler, Petitioner v. Steven Howell.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,

181 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8230.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 571.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Smart Choice Automotive Group, Inc., Common Stock, 
$.01 Par Value; Redeemable Warrants) File No. 1-14082

July 21, 1998.
    Smart Choice Automotive Group, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an 
application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified securities (``Securities'') from listing 
and registration on the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or 
``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Securities 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Company's Securities are quoted on NASDAQ.
    In making the decision to withdraw its Securities from listing on 
the BSE, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and 
expenses of maintaining listing of its Securities on the BSE. The 
benefits from listing do not warrant the expenditure of the time and 
money necessary to comply with the rules and regulations governing 
listing and registration, and trading in the Securities can adequately 
be handled in the over-the-counter market. Accordingly, the Company 
does not see any particular advantage in the trading of its Securities 
on the BSE.
    On June 11, 1998, the Company notified the BSE that it was 
requesting the delisting of the Securities, and, in a letter dated June 
12, 1998, the BSE raised no objection to such delisting.
    Any interested person may, on or before August 11, 1998, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
Exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20052 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M