alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 347 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 187
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 347

                          [Report No. 116-98]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2019

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 10, 2019

              Reported by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation 
   Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Disposal Reauthorization 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control 
Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2023'' and inserting ``September 30, 2031''.
                                                       Calendar No. 187

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 347

                          [Report No. 116-98]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation 
   Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1675

___________

Mark Anthony Gladney, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Hilton Frontenac Hotel, * District Court for the Eastern

St. Louis Hotel, * District of Missouri.

* 

Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Phyllis Kennedy, Human Resources *

Director; Tom Barton, Chef; Dennis *

Shelton, General Manager, *

*

Defendants. *

___________

Submitted: December 7, 2004

Filed: December 10, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
*

The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Mark Anthony Gladney appeals the district court’s*

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in favor of Hilton Frontenac Hotel and dismissing Gladney’s employmentdiscrimination and retaliation action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we

conclude the judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus,

we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
No. 10-1512.

#### James DeWeese, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Richland County, Ohio, Petitioner v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc.

565 U.S. 930, 132 S. Ct. 368,

181 L. Ed. 2d 234,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7025.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of Foundation for Moral Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae out of time granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 424.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7594

ANTONIO LEMARC WHITE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-769-5-FO)

Submitted: February 23, 2004 Decided: March 8, 2004

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio LeMarc White, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antonio LeMarc White, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White’s motion for the

appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See White v. United States, No. CA-02-769-5-FO (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entech Environmental
Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven D. Rosenthal, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: May 24, 2004

                                       By  /s/  Steven D. Rosenthal
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven D. Rosenthal,
                                         Chief Executive Officer of
                                         Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.
RE: Request for BACT/Permit Information

Kuterbach, John F (DEC) 

t

o

:

Shaheerah Kelly 01/06/2010 10:36 AM

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Alaska’s air permits may be accessed through the following link

http://www.dec.state.ak.us/air/ap/final.htm

Compliance information is best found through ECHO

http://www.epa‐echo.gov/echo/compliance_report_air.html

I hope this helps.

John Kuterbach

From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 9:15 AM

To: Kuterbach, John F (DEC)

Subject: Request for BACT/Permit Information

Hi. 

I'm seeking information on whether the following units listed under RBLC entry AK-0047 are currently 

achieving the NOx and CO limits that are associated with the units. Attached is an RBLC report of the 

emission limits. I obtained this information from the RBLC at http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/cfm/rbfind.cfm. I 

would like to obtain the current permits for these units. Can you let me know how I may do so? Your 

assistance on this would be greatly appreciated. You were listed as the contact for the RBLC entry. If you 

are not the contact, please let me know who I should talk to. 

Thanks.

z HEATERS (2), H-5302A AND H-5302B

z HEATERS (2), H-4510A AND H-4510B 

z HEATERS (2), H-2001A AND H-2001B 

z ENGINES (3), PU-0101A, PU-0101B, PU-0101C 

z HEATERS (2), H-5701A AND H-5701B 

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Air Division (AIR-3)

U S EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
No. 11-7055.

#### Eric Flores, Petitioner v. El Paso Police Department, et al.

565 U.S. 1122, 132 S. Ct. 1023,

181 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 294.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6579.

#### Michael Todd Panella, Petitioner v. John Marshall, Warden.

565 U.S. 1073, 132 S. Ct. 774,

181 L. Ed. 2d 509,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8309.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 603.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.47 CWT 0.965 $9.1386

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.1115 LB 3.5 $7.3903

Class I Price $16.5288

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.37 CWT 0.965 $9.0421

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0281 LB 3.5 $7.0984

Class I Price $16.1404

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.3884

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0334

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0167

Price change per quart $0.0083

Price change per pint $0.0042

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0030

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0025

Price change per half pint $0.0021

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: July 5, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

National Park Service


Keweenaw National Historical Park Advisory Commission Meeting

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Keweenaw 
National Historical Park Advisory Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

DATES: August 25, 1998; 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESS: Keweenaw National Historical Park Headquarters, 100 Red Jacket 
Road (2nd floor), Calumet, Michigan 49913-0471.
    The Chairman's welcome; minutes of the previous meeting; update on 
the general management plan; update on park activities; old business; 
new business; next meeting date; adjournment. This meeting is open to 
the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Keweenaw National 
Historical Park, Frank C. Fiala, P.O. Box 471, Calumet, Michigan 49913-
0471, 906-337-3168.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Keweenaw National Historical Park was 
established by Public Law 102-543 on October 27, 1992.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-20368 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
No. 11-27.

#### Richard L. Baud, et ux., Petitioners v. Krispen S. Carroll.

565 U.S. 1110, 132 S. Ct. 997,

181 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 318.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*733Same case below, 634 F.3d 327.
Exhibit 4.13


 





 


OPTIONAL CASH INVESTMENT FORM


Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan


 


To make an optional cash investment under Stock Purchase feature
of the First United Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, please complete this form and return it, along with
a check in the amount of your optional cash investment, to StockTrans, Inc. in the enclosed envelope. An optional cash investment
may not be less than $50.00 and may not exceed, when aggregated with all other optional cash investments made during the calendar
quarter, $100,000.00. Your check should be made payable to “StockTrans, Inc.”


 


These investments must be received at least five (5) days prior
to the Dividend Payment Date, but no earlier than 30 days prior to the Dividend Payment Date.


 





 





	Name of Shareholder (please print)	__________________________________
	 	 
	Address of Shareholder	__________________________________
	 	 
	 	__________________________________
	 	 
	Amount of Optional Cash Investment:	$_________________________________ 
	 	 
	 	 
	Completed form must be returned to:	Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc.
	 	1717 Arch Street, Suite 1300
	 	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
No. 11-5572.

#### Malvin Palmer, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 329,

181 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5840.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 U.S. App. D.C. 241, 642 F.3d 1062.
No. 10-10821.

#### John Albert Flores, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 177,

181 L. Ed. 2d 87,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6074.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 463.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2004 (the Report), I, Francis
I. duPont, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Francis I. duPont, III Francis I. duPont, III
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2004
Oct 27 2010 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President & CEO 

Seaborne Virgin Island, Inc. 

1210 Watergut 

Christiansted, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 121, Appendix K, 5(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your September 20, 2010, exemption request on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Island, 

Inc. into the public docket (No. FAA-2010-0947), but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following: 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 11-5865.

#### Calvin James, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 937, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 245,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6593.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-6955.

#### Yan Ju Wang, Petitioner v. Appellate Division, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, et al.

565 U.S. 1120, 132 S. Ct. 1076,

181 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 199.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3304 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve components of the 

Armed Forces and members of the National Guard who, 

after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or 

to perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 

90 days. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3304 RDS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

5 Reservists Debt Relief Extension Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF 

7 AMENDMENT. 

8 Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists 

9 Debt Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–438; 122 Stat. 

10 5000) is amended by striking ‘‘11-year’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘15-year’’. 

12 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

14 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

15 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

16 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

17 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

18 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro19 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

20 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-6677.

#### Nyka O’Connor, Petitioner v. Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1081, 132 S. Ct. 837,

181 L. Ed. 2d 530,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8823.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-110, RM-9311]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Humboldt, NE

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by C.R. 
Communications, Inc. seeking the allotment of Channel 244A to Humboldt, 
NE, as the community's first local aural service. Channel 244A can be 
allotted to Humboldt in compliance with the Commission's minimum 
distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 2.1 
kilometers (1.4 miles) southeast, at coordinates 40-09-00 North 
Latitude and 95-55-43 West Longitude, to avoid a short-spacing to 
Station KZKX, Channel 245C1, Seward, NE.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Charles 
A. Radatz, President, C.R. Communications, Inc., P.O. Box 589, Falls 
City, NE 68355 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-110, adopted July 1, 
1998, and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19309 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
No. 10-11211.

#### Kofi Kyei, Petitioner v. Oregon Department of Transportation, et al.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 498,

181 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7892.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-11113.

#### Nicholas Bernard Fuller, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1050, 132 S. Ct. 755,

181 L. Ed. 2d 475,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8466.

November 28, 2011.

On petition for writ certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Sykes v. United States, 564 U.S. 1, 131 S. Ct. 2267, 180 L. Ed. 2d 60 (2011).

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 655.
MILTON CUTTLER 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this third day of June 1997 for 

his extraordinary leadership and support as Assistant Chief, Technical Services Branch, Directorate 

of Medical Materiel – and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at 

DPSC – from 1953 to 1994. Mr. Cuttler was essential in establishing standards for pharmaceuticals 

and medical products when government standards were clearly inadequate. He assisted in 

developing and applying pharmaceutical manufacturing standards. As a program manager and 

leader in the Department of Defense Acquisition and Distribution of Commercial Products program, 

Mr. Cuttler led the effort to convert military specifications to commercial item descriptions. Mr. 

Cuttler was known for his support to all customers within the agency, as well as external 

customers. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/cuttler.htm 1/21/2016
No. 11-5968.

#### Elisha Lacy Dickens, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 359,

181 L. Ed. 2d 227,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6878.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 364.