39854 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 1998 / Notices

m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18

CFR of the Commission’s regulations, if

any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or

person believes that an additional

scientific study should be conducted in

order to form an adequate factual basis

for a complete analysis of the

application on its merit, the resource

agency, Indian Tribe, or person must file

a request for a study with the

Commission not later than 60 days from

the issuance date of this notice and

serve a copy of the request on the

applicant.

David P. Boergers,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–19759 Filed 7–23–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed During the Week

of May 18 Through May 22, 1998

During the Week of May 18 through

May 22, 1998, the appeals, applications,

petitions or other requests listed in this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy.

Any person who will be aggrieved by

the DOE action sought in any of these

cases may file written comments on the

application within ten days of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt of actual notice, whichever

occurs first. All such comments shall be

filed with the Office of Hearings and

Appeals, Department of Energy,

Washington, D.C. 20585–0107.

Dated: July 16, 1998.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of May 18 through May 22, 1998]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

5/18/98 ............... Florida, Tallahassee, Florida ....... VEG–0004 Petition for Special Redress. If granted: The Office of Hearings

and Appeals would review the State of Florida’s Revised

Amendment #2 to its Thirteenth Stripper Well Plan to determine

whether it is consistent with the Stripper Well Settlement Agreement.

5/22/98 ............... Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds,

Palme, Topeka, Kansas.

VFA–0420 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The April 21,

1998 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the

Southwestern Power Administration would be rescinded, and

Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds & Palmer, L.L.P. would receive access to certain DOE information.

[FR Doc. 98–19814 Filed 7–23–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Issuance of Decisions and

Orders During the Week of June 15

Through June 19, 1998

During the week of June 15 through

June 19, 1998, the decisions and orders

summarized below were issued with

respect to appeals, applications,

petitions, or other requests filed with

the Office of Hearings and Appeals of

the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Copies of the full text of these

decision and order are available in the

Public Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, 950 L’Enfant

Plaza, SW, Washington, D.C., Monday

through Friday, except federal holidays.

They are also available in Energy

Management: Federal Energy

Guidelines, a commercially published

loose leaf reporter system. Some

decisions and orders are available on

the Office of Hearings and Appeals

World Wide Web site at http://

www.oha.doe.gov.

Dated: July 16, 1998.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Decision List No. 90

Appeals

Godell, Stratton, Edmonds & Palmer,

L.L.P., 6/17/98, VFA–0420

DOE denied an appeal of a

determination issued by the

Southwestern Power Administration.

OHA found that the search conducted

was reasonably calculated to uncover

material responsive to the request.

Lee M. Graham, 6/17/98, VFA–0236

Lee M. Graham appealed a denial by

the Albuquerque Operations Office of a

request for information that he filed

under the Freedom of Information Act.

Albuquerque responded by stating that

it could neither confirm nor deny the

existence of records responsive to Mr.

Graham’s request. Based on its review of

the nature of the request, the DOE

determined that Albuquerque’s Glomar

response was appropriate. Accordingly,

the Appeal was denied.

Personnel Security Hearing

Personnel Security Hearing, 6/18/98,

VSO–0197

A hearing officer determined that an

individual had not mitigated security

concerns concerning a diagnosis of

narcissistic personality disorder, and a

conviction for illegally intercepting oral

communication. Accordingly, the

hearing officer recommended that the

individual’s access authorization should

not be restored.

Refund Applications

Enron Corp./Moon Scott Joint Venture,

6/19/98, RF340–00007

The DOE granted a refund to the

Moon Scott Joint Venture (the Joint

Venture) for product purchased by NGL

Supply, Inc. (NGL Supply) in the Enron

Corporation (Enron) special refund

proceeding. The DOE found that the

Joint Venture possessed the right to

refund of NGL Supply. The DOE found

that NGL Supply’s butane purchases

from Enron were spot purchases and not

eligible for a refund. DOE also excluded

its 1973 natural gasoline purchases

because they were made pursuant to a

fixed price contract that was established

prior to price controls. The DOE then

found that NGL Supply had shown that

it was injured by its purchases of

natural gasoline from Enron from 1975

through 1979 and was entitled to a full

volumetric refund. However, it limited

the firm’s refund for its Enron propane