alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20665]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

July 28, 1998.
time and date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, August 5, 1998.

place: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

status: Open.

matters to be considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:
    1. Secretary of Labor v. Harlan Cumberland Coal Co., Docket Nos. 
KENT 96-254, etc. (Issues include (a) whether Harlan violated 30 CFR 
Sec. 75.202(a) and the violation was significant and substantial, (b) 
whether Harlan violated 30 CFR Sec. 75.220 and Sec. 75.400, and (c) 
whether Harlan's violations of 30 CFR Sec. 75.517, Sec. 75.604, and 
Sec. 75.1106-3(a)(2) were significant and substantial.

time and place: 10:00 a.m., Friday, August 28, 1998.

place: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

status: Open.

matters to be considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:
    2. Secretary of Labor v. White Oak Mining & Constr. Co., Docket No. 
WEST 96-338. (Issues include whether the judged erred in using the 
reasonably prudent person test to determine if White Oak violated 30 
CFR Sec. 48.7(a), and whether substantial evidence supports the judge's 
decision that White Oak did not violate 30 CFR Sec. 48.7(a) when it 
task trained a miner as a miner operator.)
    Any person attending an open meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR Sec. 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec. 2706.160(d).

contact person for more info: Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 98-20665 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
June 9, 2021 DLA-SM-21-3194

DLA - Strategic Materials Announces 

Tungsten Metal Products Awards 

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – The Defense Logistics Agency - Strategic Materials 

announced today that 93,323 KgW of tungsten metal products has been 

awarded under DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 (Negotiated) Amendment 

No. 001 (FY 2021 Tungsten Metal Products). The award has a total 

value of approximately $2.15M. 

*The single awardee name has been withheld

For additional information please visit our website 

www.dla.mil/strategic-materials or contact DLA Strategic Materials 

Directorate of Strategic Planning and Market Research at 

DLAStrategicMaterials@dla.mil.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 1, 2013

h0424

Order 

May 1, 2013

145921

COUNTY OF MASON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145921

COA: 301952

Mason CC: 10-000202-CE

INDIAN SUMMER COOPERATIVE, INC.,

d/b/a MASON COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS

COOPERATIVE, INC., d/b/a MASON

COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS, INC., d/b/a

MASON COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS

CO-OP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 35.4  LOGO Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Series 2017-CD5 Pursuant to Section 3.01 (37) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the Servicing Agreement), I hereby attest
that:  i.
A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under my
supervision.  ii.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material
respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing. Berkadia,  LOGO Mark E. McCool President February 10, 2019 Inv. 228 Lib. A
1 11 Del. C. 

### § 3901(d) (2012) (“No sentence of conf inement of any c

riminal defendant...shall be made to run concurrently with any other sente

nce of confinement imposed on such criminal defnedant.”).

IN THE SUPERI OR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAW ARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DEL AWARE

v. HASANI PERKINS ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 0811004552 ) ) ) )
Submitte d: Jul y 17, 2014 Decided: August 21, 2014 Upon Defendant’s Motion for Modifi cati on of Sentence

ORDER 1. On July

12, 200 9, D efen dant w as sen tence d as a n H abitua l Offend er, purs uant to 11 Del . C. § 4214(a) t o 8 year s at Level5 for Assault Second Degree; as an Habitual Offender to 5 years at Level 5 for Ca rjacking Se cond D egree; 3 years a t Level 5 for AttemptedRobbery Fi rst Degre e; an d 2 years at L evel 5 , suspe nded for 2 years at L evel 4 Cres t, suspended upon succ essf ul complet ion of Crest

for the ba lance at

Level 3, hol d at Le vel 5 pending pla cement at Level4, for fe lony CriminalMischief. In accordance wit h Titl e 11, Sect ion 3901(d) of the Delaware Code, the Level 5 s entences are consec utive. 12 State v. Ismaaeel , 840 A.2d 644, 654 (Del. Super. 2004).

2. Section 3901( d) recently has been amended, wit

h an effective date of

July 9, 2014. As ame nded , Sectio n 39 01(d ) prov ides in perti nent part : “The court shalldirect

whether the sentence of confinement of anycrimina l defendant by any court of t

his State shal l be made to run concurr ently

or consecut ively

with any other s entence of conf

i nement imposed on s uch crim inal d efe nda nt.” 3. Defendant request s that the Court modi fy hi s sente nce so that the Level 5 s entences of c onfinem ent b e se rve d co ncu rren tly. 4. Am ende d statute s will n ot be a pplied retroac tively, unle s s the sta tute clea rly contai ns express language i ndicat ing that the le gisl ature intended re troactive appl icat ion. 2 5. The Co urt find s that S ection 390 1(d), as ame nded , was not in ten de d b y the De law are G ene ral A ssem bly to h ave retro activ e effec t. TH ER EF O RE , D ef

en da nt ’s M ot io n t o M od ify S en ten ce is h er eb y DENIE D. IT I S SO ORDERE D.



### /s/ 

# M ary M . J o hn ston The Honor

able Mar y M. Johnston
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financialofficer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation, referred to as the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION         May 10, 2007   /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN Bruce R. Knooihuizen      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer      (principal financial officer)
No. 11-6164.

#### Timothy Hobson, Petitioner v. Rosanne Campbell, Warden.

565 U.S. 1015, 132 S. Ct. 551,

181 L. Ed. 2d 399,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7962.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3402 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3402

  To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to establish the 
                        style for amending laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2019

 Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. Meadows, Mr. 
Massie, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Davidson of Ohio, 
  Mr. McClintock, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Norman, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Tonko, Ms. 
   Norton, and Mr. Huffman) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to establish the 
                        style for amending laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Readable Legislation Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDING LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 115. Amending laws
    ``No section of an Act shall be revised or amended by mere 
reference to it. Every bill or joint resolution which amends an 
existing section of any Act shall set forth the entire section, showing 
the omissions and insertions proposed by appropriate typographical 
devices.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding after 
the item relating to section 114 the following new item:

``115. Amending laws.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by it shall take effect on January 
1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.46 CWT 0.965 $5.2689

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5363 LB 3.5 $8.8771

Class I Price $14.1460

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.25 CWT 0.965 $6.0313

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6641 LB 3.5 $9.3244

Class I Price $15.3556

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($1.2097)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.1040)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0520)

Price change per quart ($0.0260)

Price change per pint ($0.0130)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0094)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0078)

Price change per half pint ($0.0065)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.10)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.05)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.03)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Aug. 5, 2018
### SCPW-13-0001202
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

BRANDON SAK TACHINO, Petitioner.

vs. THE HONORABLE PATRICK W. BORDER, Judge of the First Circuit of the State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 12-1-1445)
ORDER ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a , a n d P o l l a c k , J J
. )



### On May 31, 2013, petitioner Brandon Sak Tachino filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. On June 12, 2013, petitioner filed a notice of withdrawal of his petition for a writ of mandamus. Inasmuch as it appears that the petition for a writ of mandamus has been withdrawn,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 18, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0001202 18-JUN-2013 02:28 PM
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 15217 STANDARD 57.64 4.21 14.88

Tolerance

1 1 YELLOW LIMIT 56.17 4.45 15.44 -1.46 0.24 0.56 0.76

2 2 ORANGE LIMIT 56.29 4.45 15.25 -1.35 0.24 0.37 0.67

3 3 RED LIMIT 56.00 4.62 15.52 -1.63 0.41 0.64 0.91

4 4 GREEN LIMIT 56.06 4.28 15.35 -1.57 0.07 0.47 0.75

5 5 YELLOWGREEN LIMIT 56.21 4.20 15.15 -1.43 -0.01 0.27 0.64

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number KHAKI 3729 Piece/Roll Number 15217

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 6, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED, POLYAMIDE, HIGH 

TEMPERATURE, SIMPLEX, JERSEY MIL-C-81393B
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.86 CWT 0.965 $14.3399

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.6755 LB 3.5 $5.8643

Class I Price $20.2042

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.55 CWT 0.965 $14.0408

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.4727 LB 3.5 $5.1545

Class I Price $19.1952

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.0090

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0868

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0434

Price change per quart $0.0217

Price change per pint $0.0108

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0078

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0065

Price change per half pint $0.0054

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.09

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

**No price adjustment is required this month since the price change per gallon in either direction 

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause.)

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: November 3, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Kevin Kelly     
|                    |  |  |  | L. Kevin Kelly         
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-6637.

#### Arthur L. Campbell, Petitioner v. City of Detroit, Michigan, et al.

565 U.S. 1081, 132 S. Ct. 818,

181 L. Ed. 2d 529,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8793.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 61046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8048]

Presidential Determination No. 2012-16; Correction

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State published a document in the Federal 
Register on September 24, 2012 (77 FR 58921) concerning Presidential 
Determination No. 2012-16. The final sentence in the published document 
is incorrect. This notice corrects this error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Freer, (202) 312-9607.

Correction

    In a notice that published September 24, 2012 in the Federal 
Register, 77 FR 58921, the following is corrected: In the final 
sentence of Presidential Determination No.2012-16, change to:
    ``You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this 
determination to the Congress, and to publish it in the Federal 
Register.''

    Dated: September 28, 2012.
Janet Freer,
Acting Director, Office of Directives Management, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2012-24704 Filed 10-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
<Page>

Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-46954 of Covista Communications Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No.'s 33-64611, 333-79165, 333-72720, 333-82616, and 333-82620 of Covista
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated May 15, 2003, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covista Communications, Inc. for
the year ended January 31, 2003.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 15, 2003
CYBER MERCHANTS EXCHANGE

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Cyber Merchants  Exchange,  Inc. Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Frank S. Yuan,
Chairman,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
          fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
          results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Frank S. Yuan
     -----------------
         Frank S. Yuan
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
May 13, 2005



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by section 906, has been provided to cyber merchants exchange, inc. And
will be  retained  by  cyber  merchants  exchange,  inc.  And  furnished  to the
securities and exchange commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-6646.

#### Raymond Lionel Oubichon, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

565 U.S. 1081, 132 S. Ct. 818,

181 L. Ed. 2d 529,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8748.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 235.
No. 11-6397.

#### Dwight Garrison, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,

181 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8128.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.