alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DUANE MARCEL HOLMES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 774 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 11-6192.

#### Joaquin Gomes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 956, 132 S. Ct. 433,

181 L. Ed. 2d 281,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7160.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 279 Fed. Appx. 861.
Chromium Metal Offering

Item # Location Drums Origin

Unit of Measure................... Pounds Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

November 13, 2023

November 14, 2023

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2024

Basic Ordering Agreement... Chromium Metal Date of Posting...................

Commodity.................................Chromium Metal Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Type Lot #

Totals

Net Weight ST

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

*

All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

ST 

Quantity Offered/Minimum Bid

160.16 320,320 Lbs

0334a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0334b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0334c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0334d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0345a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 13 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0345b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 13 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0345c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 13 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0345d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 13 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0353a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 17 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0353b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 17 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0353c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 17 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0353d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 17 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0316a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0316b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0316c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020

0316d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 20020
October 4, 2022 DLA-SM-23-3219

ANNUAL MATERIALS PLAN FOR FY 2023

 

The Defense Logistics Agency-Strategic Materials today announced the Fiscal Year 2023

Annual Materials Plan (AMP) for potential disposals. The FY 2023 AMP is effective 

October 1, 2022 and will expire September 30, 2023.

 

Annual Materials Plan for FY 2023 (Potential Disposals*)

Material Unit

Ceiling 

Quantity

Beryllium Metal ST 8

Chromium, Ferro ST 24,000

Chromium, Metal ST 500

Germanium KG 5,000

Manganese, Ferro ST 50,000

Manganese, Metallurgical Grade SDT 167,000

Aerospace Alloys LBS 1,500,000

Platinum Tr Oz 8,380

Iridium Tr Oz 489

Quartz Crystals LB 15,759

Tantalum LBS 190

Tin MT 688

Titanium Based Alloys LBS 600,000

Tungsten Ores & Concentrates LBS W 2,500,000

Zinc ST 2,500

 *Disposals are defined in U.S.C. 50 as any disposal or sale of NDS stock

The inventory of materials available for sale can be viewed at the

DLA-Strategic Materials website

www.dla.mil/strategic-materials
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A192
Exhibit 10.1

 

EXECUTION VERSION

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of June 26, 2014 (this “Amendment”) to the Term Credit Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2014 (the “Credit Agreement”), by and among THE MEN’S WEARHOUSE, INC. (the “Borrower”), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and the Lenders party thereto.  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning given such terms by the Credit Agreement.

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

The parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

ARTICLE I

 

Amendment

 

Section 2.09(e) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the reference to “six months” appearing therein with “one year”.

 

ARTICLE II

 

Conditions to Effectiveness

 

This Amendment shall become effective on the date (the “Amendment Effective Date”) on which the Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received signatures from the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and Lenders constituting the Required Lenders under the Credit Agreement.

 

ARTICLE III

 

Miscellaneous

 

Section 3.1.           Continuing Effect; No Other Amendments or Waivers.  This Amendment shall constitute a Loan Document.  Except as expressly contemplated by Article I hereof, this Amendment shall not constitute an amendment or waiver of or consent to any provision of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document.  From and after the Amendment Effective Date, each reference to the “Credit Agreement” shall refer to the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

 

Section 3.2.           Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment by telecopier or other electronic means shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.

 

Section 3.3.           Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

 











 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

2











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
    	
THE   MEN’S WEARHOUSE, INC., as Borrower
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   Kelly M. Dilts
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Kelly M. Dilts
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   SVP, Finance
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
JPMORGAN   CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Lender
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/   John Kushnerick
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   John Kushnerick
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    
				


 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to Term Credit Agreement]
No. 11-315.

#### Mahmood Yoonessi, Petitioner v. Randy Ratajczak, et al.

565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 581,

181 L. Ed. 2d 423,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8188,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 15 N.Y.3d 913, 913 N.Y.S.2d 126, 939 N.E.2d 144.
Resolution No. 6/19-4 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES 

VACCINES FOR CHILDREN PROGRAM VACCINES TO 

PREVENT POLIOMYELITIS

The purpose of this resolution is to update the Recommended Vaccination Schedule and Intervals 

section to reflect the currently available inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) and IPV- containing vaccines 

that can be used to prevent polio. 

VFC resolution 06/09-1 is repealed and replaced by the following: 

Eligible groups 

All infants and children at least six weeks of age. 

 

Recommended Schedule and Intervals for Polio-containing Vaccines

The table below indicates single antigen and combination vaccines licensed and currently available 

for routine use to prevent polio. 

Vaccine Brand(s) Schedule Comments

IPV Ipol 2,4,6-18 mos; 4-6 yrs Approved for use in infants and 

adults

DTaP-HepB-IPV Pediarix 2,4,6 mos Approved for first 3 doses of 

IPV through 6 yrs

DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentacel 2,4,6 and 15-18 mos Approved for 4 doses of IPV 

through 4 yrs

DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB Vaxelis 2,4,6 mos Approved for first 3 doses of 

IPV through 4 yrs

DTaP-IPV Kinrix, 

Quadracel

4-6 yrs Approved for booster dose at 

age 4-6 yrs

Additional details can be found at: 

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5830a3.htm?s_cid=mm5830a3_e* 

Recommended dosage 

Refer to product package inserts. 

 

Contraindications and Precautions 

Contraindications and Precautions can be found in the package inserts available at: 

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states

 [If an ACIP recommendation or notice regarding polio vaccination is published within 6 months 

following this resolution, the relevant language above (except in the eligible groups sections) will 

be replaced with the language in the recommendation and incorporated by reference to the 

publication URL.] 

 
 Adopted and Effective: June 26, 2019

 

This document can be found on the CDC website at: 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/providers/resolutions.html
≥95% (2 awardees)

75% - 94% (3 awardees)

50% - 74% (21 awardees)

25% - 49% (18 awardee)

<25% (10 awardee)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (1 awardees)

Percentage of adults aged ≥19 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2016

National Participation: 44% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2016 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6131-9]


Proposed CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the H. Brown 
Company, Inc. Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposal of CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the H. 
Brown Company, Inc. Superfund Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 
1986 (SARA), Pub. L. 99-499, notification is hereby given that a 
proposed prospective purchaser agreement (PPA) for the H. Brown 
Company, Inc. Superfund Site (Site) located in Walker, Michigan, has 
been executed by DBV Partners, L.L.C. The proposed PPA has been 
submitted to the Attorney General for approval. The proposed PPA would 
resolve certain potential claims of the United States under Sections 
106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, against DBV Partners, 
L.L.C. The proposed PPA would pay to the United States $290,000 to be 
applied toward outstanding response costs incurred by the United States 
in conducting a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study and the 
initial Remedial Design at the Site. THe Site is on the National 
Priorities List, and EPA is negotiating with potentially responsible 
parties to implement the remedy, which includes redevelopment of the 
Site, set forth in the Record of Decision.

DATES: Comments on the proposed PPA must be received by U.S. EPA on or 
before August 28, 1998.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the proposed PPA is available for review at U.S. 
EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 
Please contact Cynthia A. King at (312) 886-6831, prior to visiting the 
Region 5 office.
    Comments on the proposed PPA should be addressed to Cynthia A. 
King, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard (Mail Code C-14J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia A. King at (312) 886-6831, of the U.S. EPA Region 5 Office of 
Regional Counsel.
    A 30-day period, commencing on the date of publication of this 
notice, is open for comments on the proposed PPA. Comments should be 
sent to the addressee identified in this document.

Richard Karl,
Acting Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 98-20287 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.R., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.B., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 11 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Burich, Petitioner,*

No. 91935-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45400-9-II, June 4, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1003. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
STATE OF MISSOURI, )

 )

Respondent, )

 )

vs. ) No. SD36013

 )

JOSEPH THERON WRIGHT, ) FILED: February 11, 2020

 )

Appellant. )

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STODDARD COUNTY

Honorable Robert N. Mayer, Judge

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS

Convicted of second-degree domestic assault, a class D felony, Appellant 

received a 12-year sentence as a § 565.079 persistent assault offender, which the 

state now concedes as error.1 Finding no merit to Appellant’s other point, we 

reverse and remand for resentencing.

The persistent-assault-offender finding was based on Appellant’s two other 

assault convictions, one in 2012, but the other on August 28, 2018, a week after

the instant offense. We agree with the parties that this was error; all findings of 

guilt needed to pre-date the instant offense. § 565.079.10. We also agree that 

proper recourse is to reverse and remand for resentencing within the range of 

punishment for a class C felony, three to ten years.2

 1 Statutory citations are RSMo as amended through 2017. 

2 Both parties acknowledge the court’s finding that Appellant also was a § 558.016 persistent felony 

offender based on his 2012 felony assault plea and a 2011 felony drug plea.
2

We reject Appellant’s other charge that the trial court “abused its discretion 

or plainly erred” in overruling Appellant’s objection to an alleged closing-argument 

comment on Appellant’s failure to testify. Plain error is the applicable standard 

given the objection’s lack of specificity, and no manifest injustice or miscarriage of 

justice appears.3 See State v. Hawkins, 328 S.W.3d 799, 812-14 (Mo.App. 

2010).

We reverse and remand solely for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. – OPINION AUTHOR

JEFFREY W. BATES, C.J. – CONCURS

MARY W. SHEFFIELD, J. – CONCURS

 3 We quote the transcript: 

[PROSECUTOR]: [The victim] came. She faced her accuser. She faced her 

assaulter. Stood on the stand and told you what happened. That’s the evidence in this 

case. And that’s what happened here. It’s unrefuted. That’s the big five dollar word 

that lawyers use to say there’s nobody saying anything else.

[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Objection, Your Honor. The Defendant’s pled not guilty. 

He’s certainly disputing the victim’s statements.

[PROSECUTOR]: I’m talking about what’s in evidence.

THE COURT: All right. The Court will overrule the objection.

Specific objections to arguments or statements of counsel are required to draw the court’s attention 

to the reason for objection. See State v. Neighbors, 502 S.W.3d 745, 748 (Mo.App. 2016). Here, 

trial counsel’s objection (“The Defendant’s pled not guilty. He’s certainly disputing the victim’s 

statements.”) differs from Point 2 on appeal (impermissible comment on a defendant’s right to 

remain silent).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

JAMES LEROY THOMAS, : No. 157 MM 2020 

Petitioner 

v. 

HON. SHAWN D. MEYERS, 

Respondent 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2020, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of 

the jurist from the caption.
No. 11-6838.

#### Steven L. Pinder, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

565 U.S. 1069, 132 S. Ct. 782,

181 L. Ed. 2d 501,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8585,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5163.

#### Michael Shavers, Petitioner v. Catherine Bauman, et al.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 276,

181 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5506.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
CHESTER A. KOWALCZYK

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center (DPSC) Hall of Fame this twelfth day of 

August 1994 for his extraordinary leadership and support as Commander of the Defense 

Subsistence Region-Europe from 1977 to 1980. Colonel Kowalczyk played an integral part in 

establishing the role of this new command. He was the driving force in establishing and expanding 

the European Subsistence theater. He negotiated numerous agreements between the Services and 

DPSC, and set up the infrastructure for all European food support. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/kowalczy.htm 1/27/2016
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(a), that the Commodity 
Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committee will 
conduct a public meeting on August 12, 1998 in the first floor hearing 
room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters, Three 
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. The 
meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and last until 5:00 p.m. The agenda 
will consist of the following:

Agenda

1. Welcoming Remarks
2. Status Report on the Agricultural Trade Option Pilot Program and 
Discussion by Committee Members
3. Overview and Discussion of Proposed Rules Increasing Speculative 
Position Limits for Certain Agricultural Commodities and Amending CFTC 
Guideline 1, Contract Market Designation Requirements
4. The Future of Futures--a Discussion of Current Developments, 
Including Electronic and Off-Exchange Trading
5. Overview of the Upcoming CFTC Reauthorization
6. Other Business.

    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory 
Committee, Commissioner David D. Spears, is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a 
written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the 
statement to the attention of: The Agricultural Advisory Committee, c/o 
Commissioner David D. Spears, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 
Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, 
before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral 
statements should inform Commissioner Spears in writing at the 
foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting. 
Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral 
presentation of no more than five minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on July 23, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-20249 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19806]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Cancellation of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory 
Committee on Small and Minority Business (ISAC-14)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice was published in the Federal Register dated July 1, 
1998, Volume number 63, Notice 126, page 36009, announcing a meeting of 
the Industry Sector Advisory Committee (ISAC-14) scheduled for July 20, 
1998 from 9:15 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The meeting was to be open to the 
public from 9:15 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. and closed to the public from 11:15 
a.m. to 3:00 p.m. However, due to an insufficient number of responses 
regarding attendance, the meeting had to be canceled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Daley, Office of the United 
States Trade Representative, (202) 395-6120.
Pate Felts,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 98-19806 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 

4111 A VIA TION AVENUE 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 

FAX: (907) 269-0489 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER PHONE:' (907) 269-0724 

, Mr. Dennis J. De V any 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket 2002-11586 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

.,'1 

February 23, 2011 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) Program 

in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of scheduled transportation, except for 

occasional ferry service. The communities of Elfin Cove and Pelican depend on scheduled air 

freight, passenger and mail service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and 

economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

to comment on. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Elfin Cove and Pelican 

and support the carrier selection that applied to provide this service. 

Sine) 

Steven D. Hatter 

----•. 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

cc: Marc Luiken, Commissioner, DOT &PF 

fih::'