alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(1) Adjusting Price $23.74 CWT

(2) Base Price $24.34 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.60)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0516)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0258)

Price change per quart ($0.0129)

Price change per pint ($0.0064)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0048)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0040)

Price change per half pint ($0.0032)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.05)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.03)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Dec. 7, 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN D. MARSHALL,

Appellant,

v.

HOLIDAY HUNT RUSSELL PLLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1327

[February 8, 2024]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jackie Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE-22-051871. 

John D. Marshall, Lighthouse Point, pro se. 

Holiday Hunt Russell of Holiday Hunt Russell PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00084

- CR

M ARK M ORGAN U PCHURCH

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 43rd District

Court

of Parker County ( CR20

- 0035 )

November 23, 2022

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’ s ju dgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
**Exhibit 32.1**

** ** 

** ** 

**CERTIFICATION**

  

  

In connection with the Annual Report of Minaro Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yulia Lazaridou, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

 

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

 

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

** ** 

  

  

 

 

 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

June 8, 2020                                            By:

**/S/****                     **Yulia Lazaridou

  

 

Name:              Yulia Lazaridou

  

                                                                                                             Title:                 President

                                                                                                            (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Percentage of adolescents aged 11 – 17 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, DC, and eight Territories†, 2011

National Coverage: 53 % (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2011 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL (13%);

District of Columbia (111%);

Houston, TX (28%); 

New York City, NY (81%); 

Philadelphia, PA (74%); 

San Antonio, TX (51%).

† American Samoa (no report);

Marshall Islands (112%);

Federated States of Micronesia (7%);

Guam (77%);

N. Mariana Islands (no report);

Palau (72%);

Puerto Rico (103%);

Virgin Islands (No IIS).

≥95% (7 grantees)

67%-94% (8 grantees)

34%-66% (23 grantees)

≤33% (16 grantees)

No data/No report (2 grantees)
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

THE NATION’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

WARFIGHTER FIRST

DLA Troop Support

Clothing & Textiles

Environmental Programs

2019
WARFIGHTER FIRST

Program Scope

79

• Ensure green considerations are included in 

all of C&T’s procurement processes
WARFIGHTER FIRST 80

Demonstrate commitment to DLA-TS’s environmental 

policy

Support C&T customers in meeting their 

environmental responsibilities

Comply with environmental regulations and DLA’s 

commitment to environmental stewardship

Conform with ISO 14001 Standard
WARFIGHTER FIRST

Use the DLA-TS EMS framework to guide 

design and implementation of the C&T 

green procurement program
WARFIGHTER FIRST

Why Use the EMS?

82
WARFIGHTER FIRST

Meeting Customer’s Needs

83
WARFIGHTER FIRST 84

Next Steps

• Develop a level of stakeholders within our 

customer community 

• Provide a level of support and 

understanding with C&T manufacturers 

and suppliers on the importance of 

sustainability in their current and future 

manufacturing processes 
WARFIGHTER FIRST

Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and 

Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

• Reputable dye and chemical companies, dye-houses 

and retailers will comply with the REACH process –

and register things that are already safe and being well 

managed 

• Substances used in the interest of defense and covered 

by National exemptions.

• REACH Restricted chemicals list :

85

https://www.aafaglobal.org/AAFA/Solutions_Pages/Restricted_Substance_List.aspx?

WebsiteKey=49c45f4d-69b3-4c66-823a-6d285960fed2
WARFIGHTER FIRST

CONGRESSIONAL REQUEST ON ENVIRONMENTAL 

ATTRIBUTES IN MILITARY CLOTHING 2019

• DoD policy letter issued 20 Sept 2019

• Policy outlined in FY 2020 Defense Authorization Act

• Enact more environmental attributes

• Recycled contents cited

• All services are included

• Items identified:

protective combat uniform

3RD Generation ECWSS

Army Fleece Jacket

Other protection clothing items

86
18 June 2015 ************************ 

NSN: 8940-01-645-0292 (CSF) * MONOGRAPH M2B31

 ***********************

Item: Creamy spinach fettuccine (egg noodles, spinach and mushrooms in a cream sauce) 

Document: PCR-C-087, Creamy Spinach Fettuccine (Egg Noodles, Spinach and Mushrooms in a 

Cream Sauce), Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 260 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 3 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Uniform mixture of cooked fettuccine type egg noodles and spinach in a cream sauce 

with sliced mushroom pieces.

Egg noodles: Cooked, fettuccine type or heavy soup egg noodle, approximately 2.0 

inches in length; distinct strips that readily separate; off-white to beige color.

Spinach: Cooked, evenly distributed; may be wilted; discernible pieces; cooked dark 

green spinach color.

Sauce: Medium cream to beige color with a slight green hue and contain sliced 

mushroom pieces with a tan to brown color.

Odor: Cooked spinach, mushrooms and egg noodles; mild garlic and onion seasoned cream

sauce.

Flavor: Cooked spinach, mushrooms and egg noodles; mild garlic and onion seasoned cream

sauce.

Texture:

Egg noodles: Slightly soft to slightly firm; not pasty.

Spinach: Soft.

Sauce: Smooth, moderately thick and free flowing, with slightly soft sliced mushroom 

pieces.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Egg Noodles: swollen, mushy, excessively broken

Spinach: darkened

Sauce: darkened, thickened, evidence of syneresis

Odor: Scorched, bitter, sour, rancid

Flavor: Scorched, bitter, sour, rancid

Texture:

Egg noodles: mushy, soft, excessively broken up

Spinach: dry, tough

Sauce: pasty or thin

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

None

Special Notes

None
178

APP A

DPSCH 4155.2

*************************

* MONOGRAPH NO.: M9E

*************************

ITEM: Hot Sauce

NSN: 8950-01-578-9037 ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A-A-20097

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 1-2 Kilocalories

CHARACTERISTIC OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Reddish-brown liquid, uniform suspension of minute particles.

ODOR: Pungent, peppery odor.

FLAVOR: Balanced, peppery bite.

TEXTURE: Moderately thick with no separation.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Discoloration to dark brown or black; separation.

ODOR: Plain vinegar, lacks peppery aroma.

FLAVOR: Strong vinegar, no peppery flavor, little to no bite.

TEXTURE: Clumping may form, extremely viscous almost solid, or separation

may occur.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION / TEST PROCEDURE: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Minor separation may occur, light shaking result in an acceptable, uniform,

relatively stable suspension.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Adult Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Session

Camille Kotton, MD

Chair, Adult RSV Work Group

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

February 23, 2023
2

Adult RSV Work Group Membership

ACIP Voting Members

Camille Kotton (Chair)

Keipp Talbot

Sarah Long

Ex Officio Members

Rachel Zhang (FDA)

Judy Beeler (FDA)

Nicholas Geagan (FDA)

Nadine Peart (FDA)

Sonnie Kim (NIH/NIAID)

Jeffrey Kelman (CMS)

Valerie Marshal (OIDP)

CDC Lead

Michael Melgar

Consultants

Robert Atmar (Baylor College of Medicine)

Helen Chu (University of Washington)

Marie Griffin (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

Cynthia Lucero-Obusan (Veterans Health Administration)

Tracy Ruckwardt (NIH/NIAID)

Liaisons

Kenneth Schmader (AGS)

Shmuel Shoham (ACP)

Gretchen LaSalle (AAFP)

April Killikelly (NACI, PHAC)

Winnie Su (NACI, PHAC)

Michael Hogue (APhA)

Katherine Williams (APTR)

Ruth Lynfield (NFID)

Jennifer Heath (AIM)
3

CDC Contributors

Coronavirus and Other Respiratory 

Viruses Division

Fiona Havers 

Meredith McMorrow

Diya Surie

Jennifer DeCuir

Lauren Roper

Mila Prill

Amanda Payne

Natalie Thornburg

Melissa Coughlin

Jefferson Jones

Katherine Fleming-Dutra

Ismael Ortega Sanchez

Immunization Safety Office

Anne Hause

David Shay

Christine Olson

Immunization Services Division

Neil Murthy

Patricia Wodi

Debra Blog

Andrew Leidner

Jamison Pike
4

Recap of RSV session, October 2022

 Manufacturer safety and efficacy presentation by GSK regarding 

adjuvanted candidate RSV vaccine for older adults: RSVpreF3

 Manufacturer safety and efficacy presentation by Pfizer regarding

bivalent candidate RSV vaccine for older adults: RSVpreF

 Work group interim considerations regarding novel RSV vaccines for older 

adults
5

Recent work group discussion

 Cost effectiveness of RSV vaccination among U.S. older adults

 GRADE and Evidence to Recommendations for GSK adjuvanted RSVpreF3

 GRADE and Evidence to Recommendations for Pfizer bivalent RSVpreF

 CDC vaccine safety surveillance systems
6

Recent work group discussion

 Possible policy recommendations* for RSV vaccination of U.S. older adults

– Should RSV vaccines be recommended for U.S. adults aged ≥65 years?

– Should RSV vaccines be recommended for U.S. adults aged ≥60 years?

*FDA has not yet completed review of safety and efficacy data for the GSK adjuvanted RSVpreF3 vaccine and the 

Pfizer bivalent RSVpreF vaccine. ACIP recommendations would be made only if the vaccines are approved and 

licensed by FDA.
7

Agenda: Thursday February 23, 2023

 Cost effectiveness of RSV vaccination 

among U.S. older adults

 Comparison of RSV vaccination economic 

analyses performed by U. Michigan/CDC, 

GSK, and Pfizer

 Evidence to Recommendations framework 

for GSK and Pfizer candidate vaccines

 Discussion of vaccine policy options

Dr. David Hutton

(U. Michigan)

Dr. Ismael Ortega Sanchez 

(CDC)

Dr. Michael Melgar (CDC)

Dr. Michael Melgar (CDC)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                       346
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,546,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                 220,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,538,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,494,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,917,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,538,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,975
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,686
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
No. 11-6846.

#### Michael J. Modena, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 594,

181 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8264.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 444.
No. 10-10681.

#### Carmine Sauchelli, Petitioner v. United States Postal Service, et al.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 802,

181 L. Ed. 2d 513,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8371.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*514Former decision, 565 U.S. 843, 132 S. Ct. 158, 181 L. Ed. 2d 73, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6471.
#### Drawdy Investment Company, *Appellant,*v. Samuel A. Robinson, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 21, 1926.

*MacFarlane & Pettingill,*for Appellant;

*Louis C. Massey*and *A. C. Carpenter,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been sub*670mitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, Ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-6910.

#### Derek Benton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 599,

181 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8110.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 723.
No. 11-401.

#### Loreta Sinani, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1061, 132 S. Ct. 776,

181 L. Ed. 2d 487,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8528.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 475.
No. 10-10412.

#### Patricia Shepard, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1074, 132 S. Ct. 801,

181 L. Ed. 2d 512,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8395.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*513Former decision, 565 U.S. 836, 132 S. Ct. 140, 181 L. Ed. 2d 59, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5311.
No. 10-11115.

#### Jose Alfredo Gutierrez-Jacquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 216,

181 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6608.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 407.
No. 11-162.

#### James David Cnockaert, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1014, 132 S. Ct. 550,

181 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8053.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 676.
No. 11-660.

#### Clayton Utterback, et al., Petitioners v. Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1047,

181 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 207.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           July 29, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Mitchell E. Hersh                                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                 |   | Mitchell E. Hersh                                         |
|                                                                                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|                                                                                 |   |   of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                                                                 |   |   the general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |
|                                                                                 |   |                                                      |
|                                                                                 |   |                                                      |
| Date:           July 29, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Barry Lefkowitz                                       |   |
|                                                                                 |   | Barry Lefkowitz                                           |
|                                                                                 |   | Executive Vice President and                              |
|                                                                                 |   |   Chief Financial Officer                       |
|                                                                                 |   |   of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                                                                 |   |   the general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |

----
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report of Golden Bull Limited (the “Registrant”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: August 6, 2020



|/s/ Erke Huang          | 
|----------------------- | 
|Erke Huang              | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Parker Seto         |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Parker                Seto             |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|   | Date:                November 14, 2007 |

----
No. 11-6410.

#### James Bernard Campbell, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,

181 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8186.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-6185.

#### John Carlo Manigaulte, Petitioner v. C.W. Post of Long Island University.

565 U.S. 986, 132 S. Ct. 517,

181 L. Ed. 2d 364,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7889,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Month ___________ Year ___________ MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG

UAS # 

Date Issues 

Discovered

Date Issue 

Addressed

Maintenance Performed By: 

Print & Sign

Software Updates

Airframe

Engines

Propellers

Camera Gimbal

Landing Gear

Vibration Dampening

Other: 

Issue Description & Maintenance Conducted
No. 11-6977.

#### Redale Barbour, Petitioner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

565 U.S. 1120, 132 S. Ct. 1016,

181 L. Ed. 2d 751,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 220.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.