alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AN INITIATIVE COMING FROM THE DESK OF 

THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

Scan to know more about the 

Hackathon initiative

DEMONSTRATIONS

WILL BE 4/30 & 5/1

INVITATION ONLY
DLA HACKATHON OVERVIEW

The Hackathon is an interactive phased initiative to find novel solutions and a 

repeatable framework to quickly assess and acquire AI/ML and generative AI capabilities to

address specific DLA requirements. In phase 1, the vendor needs to explain and provide a 

practical simulation of their data scraping methodologies and approaches. This should include 

insights into strategies and the potential introduction of innovative techniques that thoroughly 

showcase their Gen AI capabilities and emphasize the use of Large Language Models (LLM).

These models should be applied for constructing a knowledge base, generating new content, 

enhancing existing content, and providing content assistance.

BACKGROUND

From the desk of our DLA CIO: I understand Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning

(ML), generative AI (Gen AI), are forms of artificial intelligence that use machine learning 

models to generate new content or data. It relies on statistical patterns and structures learned 

from training on large datasets to predict outputs in response to user inputs. Gen AI describes 

a set of computational statistical models able to autonomously produce diverse and 

contextually relevant content, particularly text and imagery. Gen AI’s expanding capabilities and 

ease of use can result in automation of time-consuming knowledge work and improved 

organizational efficiency when designed and applied effectively.

TIMELINE

The general proposed timeline for the Hackathon submission, evaluation and selection 

process is as follows:

{ A }

{ B }

{ C }

{ D }

{ E }

{ F }

{ G }

{ H }

Release of Amendment 15 – 2/28/24

Window for responses closes – 3/20/24

Technical Evaluation Team to review White Papers – 3/21/24 – 4/2/24 

Vendor request to submit Technical/Cost proposals – 4/3/24 - 4/10/24 

Technical Evaluation Team to review Tech/Cost proposals – 4/10/24 -4/16/24

Technical Evaluation Team will produce final review and request 

demonstration – 4/17/24

Demonstrations – 4/30/24 and 5/1/24

Final decision and notification to vendors – 5/14/24

ABOUT DLA

As the nation’s combat logistics support agency, the Defense Logistics Agency manages the end-to-end 

global defense supply chain – from raw materials to end user disposition – for the five military services, 11 

combatant commands, other federal, state and local agencies and partner and allied nations. Under the 

guidance of National Defense Strategy (NDS), R&D embraces critical and emergent technologies (CETs) 

to evolve DLA’s industrial base and supply chain innovation across 13 leading edge Logistics Research 

(LogTech), Manufacturing Technology (ManTech), and Small Business Innovation Program (SBIP) programs 

to develop and deliver new capabilities through applied technologies and innovative solutions and 

enhance Warfighter readiness, and beyond.

DLA’s J6 Hackathon question and answers are posted as amendments to Emergent IV BAA0001-22. 

POC: RandD.DCSO@dla.mil
# ~[ 

# 9ff Emirates

12 Janua ry 2017 Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building (FOB-lOA} 800 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20591 Letter of Notification

Subject: Time-limited Exemption from Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR} part 91, § 91.227 (c) (l}(i} and (iii} - Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Equipment Performance Requirements. Reference: Grant of Exemption No. 12555, Regulatory Docket No. F AA - 2015 - 0971 Grant of Exemption 12555 provides for a time-limited grant of exemption from the ADS B Navigation Accuracy Category for Position (NACp} and Navigation Integrity Category (NIC} requirements of § 91.227 (c) (1} (i} and (iii} from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2024. Emirates- P. 0. Box 686 Dubai, U.A.E. hereby notifies the FAA that it intends to comply with the conditions and limitations expressed in the exemption cited above. Jero ecq, Manager Regulatory Affairs Flight Operations Copy: Federal Aviation Administration, New York Internationa l Field Unit 1 Aviation Plaza, Room 504, 159-30 Rockaway Blvd . Jamaica, NY 11434

Th e Intern a ti onal Ai rli ne of t he Uni ted Arab Em ira tes F li g ht Op e rati o n s P.O. Box 686. Dubai. United Arab Emirates Te lepho ne: (9714) /084231/4233/4264 Facsimile: (9714) 286408 1/82 Sita: HDOOCEK **~1..::..~ 1**  o=i.a.ll....,_pl

**~l;l.o~ l**  .i.f"o .lAl

**~·LP**

(qVIE)

**V·AE\~1 IE\~~**  I E\lE . '-'!Jl.. (9VIE ) \AlE · AI I A\

**~"'** HDOOCEK , Lu..,
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ness
Lakdawala, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ' 1350, as adopted pursuant to ' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



                                               By: /s/ Ness Lakdawala
                                                   -----------------------------
                                               Name: Ness Lakdawala
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
April 05, 2024 DLA-SM-23-3248

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR March 2024

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during March 2024.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 HC ST

LC ST

NO

SALES

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST 90 $753 K *

Tin Amendment 001 MT NO

SALES

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld

F dditi l i f ti l t t i il t DLASt t i M t i l @dl il
No. 11-295.

#### Harold Lee Harvey, Jr., Petitioner v. Barry Reddish, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 577,

181 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8229.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 1228.
Privacy Reminders

10. Why Should You Protect Your Personal Information?

To an identity thief, it can provide instant access to your financial accounts, your credit 

record and your other personal assets. If you think that no one would be interested in

your personal information, think again.

The reality is that anyone can be a victim of identity theft. In fact, according to a Federal 

Trade Commission survey, there are almost 10 million victims every year. It is often 

difficult to know how thieves obtained their victims' personal information, and while it 

definitely can happen offline, some cases start when online data is stolen. Visit the

FTC’s Identity Theft website to learn what to do if your identity is stolen. Unfortunately, 

when it comes to crimes like identity theft, you can't entirely control whether you will 

become a victim. However, you may find tips from a website created by two non-profit 

groups (the Anti-Phishing Working Group and National Cyber Security Alliance) can 

help reduce your risk while you are online.

<Return to Reminders Table>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DERRICK LOVETT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1416

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto 

County; Kimberly Bonner, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Joseph N. D'Achille Jr., Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20120]



[[Page 40329]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending July 17, 1998

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-98-4076.
    Date Filed: July 14, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 11, 1998.
    Description: Application of Fine Air Services, Inc. pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q, applies for a certificate of public 
convenience and necessity to provide scheduled foreign air 
transportation of property and mail to points in fifteen countries for 
which Fine Air currently holds only exemption authority.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3404.
    Date Filed: July 16, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 13, 1998.
    Description: Amendment to the Application of Aero Micronesia, Inc., 
d/b/a Asia Pacific Airlines of its intent to conduct its airline 
business only under the name of Asia Pacific Airlines.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3479.
    Date Filed: July 16, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 13, 1998.
    Description: Amendment to the Application of Aero Micronesia, Inc., 
d/b/a Asia Pacific Airlines of its intent to conduct its airline 
business only under the name of Asia Pacific Airlines.

    Docket Number: OST-98-4122.
    Date Filed: July 17, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 14, 1998.
    Description: Application of Swiss World Airways, S.A. pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. Section 41301 and Subpart Q, applies for a foreign air 
carrier permit to engage in scheduled and charter foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail as follows: from points 
behind Switzerland via Switzerland and intermediate points to a point 
or points in the United States and beyond.
Cynthia L. Hatten,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-20120 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40735-40736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with the policy of the Department of Justice, notice 
is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. CMC 
Heartland Partners and General Motors Corp.,  Civ. No. 98-C-494-S, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District 
of Wisconsin, on July 14, 1998. That action was brought against 
defendants pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) for payment of past costs 
incurred by the United States at the Wheeler Pit Superfund site in 
LaPrairie, Wisconsin. This decree requires defendants to pay 
$620,661.78, in satisfaction of the United States claims against it for 
response costs incurred in connection with the site through May 31, 
1997.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree for a period of 30 days from the date of this 
publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530. All comments should refer to United 
States v. CMC

[[Page 40736]]

Heartland Partners, et al.,  DOJ. Ref. <SUP><greek-i></SUP>90-11-2-
1210.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, 660 W. 
Washington Avenue, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53701-1585; at Region 5, 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Blvd, 
Chicago, IL 60604; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in 
the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs) payable to 
the Consent Decree Library. When requesting a copy please refer to 
United States v. CMC Heartland Partners, et al.,  DOJ. Ref. 
<SUP><greek-i></SUP>90-11-2-1210.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-20396 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, A. Dwight Utz, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ A. Dwight Utz                    
|                      |  |  |  | A. Dwight Utz                        
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



44
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**
I, Everett R. Dobson, Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation (the“registrant”);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.      AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 OF CONOCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES.  THE SCHEDULE IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,311
<PP&E>                                          22,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,989
<BONDS>                                          4,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,756
<SALES>                                          8,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,691
<CGS>                                            5,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,896<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    712
<INCOME-TAX>                                       313
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       399
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63<F2>
<FN>
<F1>COST OF GOODS SOLD; OPERATING EXPENSES; SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES; EXPLORATION EXPENSE; DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION; AND
TAXES OTHER THAN ON INCOME.
<F2>BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 11-6629.

#### In re David Webb, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1056, 132 S. Ct. 777,

181 L. Ed. 2d 510,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8432.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.3

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P., hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.

Date: August 6, 2010



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                             
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                 
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers
Corporation, general partner of registrant
RECORD IMPOUNDED

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0787-20

D.K.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

J.E.Y.,

Defendant-Respondent.

__________________________

Submitted December 8, 2021 – Decided December 15, 2021

Before Judges Gooden Brown and Gummer.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Family Part, Monmouth County, 

Docket No. FV-13-1572-20.

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys for appellant 

(Dillon J. McGuire, of counsel and on the briefs).

Stephen A. Gravatt, attorney for respondent.

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-0787-20

We have been advised that this matter has been amicably resolved and the 

parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal 

is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.