alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed August 1, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-19-00129-CR

___________

CHRISTINA MARIE HAYNES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 29th District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16011

O R D E R

Christina Marie Haynes entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of assault 

on a public servant. The trial court assessed Haynes’s punishment at confinement 

for five years and a fine of $2,000. Haynes’s court-appointed attorney on appeal has

filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by counsel 

but is not signed by Haynes. We abate the appeal.
In order for the motion to dismiss to comply with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion must be signed by both counsel and 

Haynes. Counsel is well aware of this requirement and has informed this court as 

follows by a letter dated July 12, 2019:

It has been made aware to me by my client that she no longer wishes to 

pursue her appeal in this matter. She has also indicated that she wishes 

for the appeal to be dismissed. . . .

Additionally, Ms. Haynes has been sent a copy of the motion to 

dismiss. As of this date I have yet to receive a copy back with her 

signature. . . .

I was never able to get Ms. Haynes to sign her Certificate of 

Appeal and return it to me or the Court in the beginning of this 

appeal. . . .

This appeal has become unduly stalled due to Haynes’s failure to sign and 

return the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal and, if she 

desires to dismiss this appeal, the lack of Haynes’s signature on the motion to dismiss

that was filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, we remand the cause to the trial 

court so that it may determine whether Haynes desires to prosecute the appeal in this 

cause.

The trial court is directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law, if 

necessary, and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court. The clerk of 

the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a clerk’s record 

containing any findings, recommendations, or orders of the trial court. The court 

reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s record from 

the hearing. The records are due to be filed in this court on or before September 5, 

2019.
The appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

August 1, 2019

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
No. 11-6894.

#### Oscar Rene Munoz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 597,

181 L. Ed. 2d 438,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8262.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 495.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Thursday, September 10, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5 
U.S.C. App. Section 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(l)(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: July 21, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-19951 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
S COTT A. SEARS , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:20- cv -02901 ( UNA ) ) DR. WARREN , ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T his matter is before the Court on its initial review of p laintiff ’s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

. The C ourt will grant the IFP application an d dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff brings undefined causes of action against “Dr. Warren,” the head psychologist at Lompoc Residential Drug Abuse Camp. See generally Compl., Dkt. 1. Plaintiff does not provide an address or any other identifying information for defendant or the Camp. See id. Plaintiff is apparently dissatisfied with his treatment by Dr. Warren, whom he broadly alleges engaged in “wrongdoing,” and argues that Dr. Warren engaged in favoritism and nepotism while treating patients at the Camp. See id. The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdi ction is available only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the dis trict court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 1 0 /13/2020P laintiff does not raise any federal ques tion , and has not alleged sufficient facts to satisfy his burden to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, this case will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

D ate: October 13, 2020

DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH United States District Judge
**IC 01-04**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**September 5, 2001**

**IC 01-04**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**September 5, 2001**

**AP8.17. APPENDIX 8.17**

**MATERIEL RELEASE ORDER DENIAL(WAREHOUSE REFUSAL)**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

1

APPENDIX 3.17

AP8.17-1

APPENDIX 8.17

AP3.17-1

AP3.13-2
No. 11-7167.

#### Richard E. Wanke, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 867,

181 L. Ed. 2d 558,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8937.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 404 Ill. App. 3d 1178, 374 Ill. Dec. 1081, 996 N.E.2d 776.
No. 11-6050.

#### William R. Noack, Petitioner v. YMCA of the Greater Houston Area.

565 U.S. 953, 132 S. Ct. 425,

181 L. Ed. 2d 277,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7365.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 347.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3557 

To prohibit the imposition of duties on the importation of goods under 

the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Ms. DELBENE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the imposition of duties on the importation of 

goods under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF DUTIES ON 

4 THE IMPORTATION OF GOODS UNDER THE 

5 INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY ECONOMIC 

6 POWERS ACT. 

7 Section 203 of the International Emergency Eco8 nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3557 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub2 section (d); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(c) The authority granted to the President by this 

6 section does not include the authority to impose duties on 

7 the importation of goods.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-6101.

#### Gil Jones, Petitioner v. Maryland State’s Attorney Office.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 511,

181 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7869.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 262.
#### A. A. Credell, M. Haskell, T. F. Morgan and Walter Dean, *Appellants,*v. Clarence J. Brown and Florence Brown, Husband and Wife, and Charles W. Howe and W. A. Norsworthy, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 22, 1926.

*L. V. Uolsberry, L. V. Trueman*and *L. L. Fabisinski,*for Appellants ;

*Philip D. Beall*and *John M. Coe,*for Appellees.

*298Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 10-11276.

#### Roy Hunt, Jr., Petitioner v. Sandhir, M.D., et al.

565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 237,

181 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6525.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 811.
No. 11-6763.

#### Eric G. Andika, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 848,

181 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8903.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5360.

#### Rodney Ash, Petitioner v. Philadelphia Prison System, et al.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 518,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8381.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 301, 181 L. Ed. 2d 183, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5448.
No. 11-393.

#### National Federation of Independent Business, et al., Petitioners v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. Florida, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

No. 11-400.

565 U.S. 1048, 132 S. Ct. 608,

181 L. Ed. 2d 446,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8296.

November 18, 2011.

H. Bartow Farr, III, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue these cases, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, is severable from the entirety of the remainder of the Act.
No. 11-5879.

#### Milford Wilson, Petitioner v. Steve Trevino, Acting Warden.

565 U.S. 965, 132 S. Ct. 459,

181 L. Ed. 2d 299,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7503.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 53497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee; Closed 
Session

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
Special Closed Session.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), notice is 
hereby given of a special closed session of the Commercial Space 
Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The special closed session 
will be an administrative session for the Committee members to review 
the provisions of the COMSTAC Charter; the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA); 41 CFR, Parts 101-6 and 102-3; and the Department of 
Transportation and FAA Orders concerning advisory committee management. 
The meeting will take place on Thursday, October 10, 2013, at the 
National Housing Center, 1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, 
from 2:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Scott (AST-3), Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-7982, email 
larry.scott@faa.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, August 20, 2013.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2013-21145 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3904 STANDARD 16.02 -0.37 -0.74

Tolerance

1 3904A ORANGE LIMIT 15.63 -0.27 -0.39 -0.39 0.10 0.35 0.65

2 3904D FULL RED 

LIMIT 14.16 -0.24 -0.78 -1.86 0.13 -0.04 1.80

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 11, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature

Shade Number BLACK 458 Piece/Roll Number 3904

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

POLYESTER/COTTON 65/35 TWILL FOR 

GFSU, TROUSERS, UNISEX GL/PD 13-12

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 11-6048.

#### Frankie L. Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 871,

181 L. Ed. 2d 569,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8901.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 363, 181 L. Ed. 2d 230, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7128.
No. 11-6417.

#### In re Keith Thomas, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 588,

181 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8101.

November 14, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-*443peris denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 14, 2003
No. 11-5101.

#### William Keisling, Petitioner v. Richard K. Renn, et al.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 872,

181 L. Ed. 2d 569,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8936.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 934, 132 S. Ct. 383, 181 L. Ed. 2d 241, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6444.
No. D-2606.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Timothy John Lucas.

565 U.S. 1052, 132 S. Ct. 809,

181 L. Ed. 2d 520,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8464.

November 28, 2011.

Timothy John Lucas, of Erie, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 11-7232.

#### Allie James Bell, Petitioner v. Larry Small, Warden.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1036,

181 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 63.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 444 Fed. Appx. 129.
No. 11-6921.

#### Escanio Bicuna-Rios, aka Escanio Rios Bicuna, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 599,

181 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8154.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
BRIGADIER GENERAL PAUL E. SMITH

UNITED STATES ARMY (RET) 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twentieth day of January 

1999 for his extraordinary leadership and support as DISC’s 6th Commander from June 1970 to 

August 1972. General Smith’s extraordinary leadership, exceptional insight, managerial 

contributions and logistics expertise enhanced both customer support and the readiness posture of 

our armed forces worldwide. Under his command, the use of indefinite delivery-type contracts and 

Blanket Purchase Agreements increased. Also, procurement administrative lead time, for both large 

and small purchases, and contract delinquency was reduced. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/smith.htm 1/21/2016
No. 11-6682.

#### Jimmy Don Coleman, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1082, 132 S. Ct. 820,

181 L. Ed. 2d 531,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8781.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41266-41267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The Meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 41267]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 30, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Neurological Disorders, and Stroke, 
Federal Building, Rm. 9C10, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9175.
    Contact Person: Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch Division of Extramural 
Activities NINDS, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, Federal 
Building, Room 9C10, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
496-9223.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-20553 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 10-11288.

#### James Eric Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 380,

181 L. Ed. 2d 239,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6419.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-6830.

#### Moises E. Bure, Petitioner v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

565 U.S. 1117, 132 S. Ct. 1008,

181 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 368.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
31



CERTIFICATIONS



I,
Michael D. West, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



Date:
May 22, 2020



|/s/
    Michael D. West     | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Michael
    D. West         | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer | 















Exhibit
31



CERTIFICATIONS



I,
Andrea E. Park, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



Date:
May 22, 2020



|/s/
    Andrea E. Park      | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Andrea
    E. Park          | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer |