##### Table of Contents

---

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington DC 20549



---

FORM 10-Q



---

(Mark One)

|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

-or-



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission File Number 0-24763



---

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 59-3429602                       
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

One Independent Drive, Suite 114

Jacksonville, Florida 32202

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)

(904) 598-7000

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Former Address

121 West Forsyth Street, Suite 200

Jacksonville, Florida 32202



---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated filer ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ̈No  x



---



---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                               |  |                                                                                                                                     |  |                     
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                     |  | Form 10-QReport Page
|PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 1.                        |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                                |  |                     
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006                                                          |  | 1                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006                                        |  | 2                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006                                         |  | 3                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners Capital and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |  | 4                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006                                         |  | 5                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                                          |  | 7                   
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 2.                        |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                               |  | 34                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 3.                        |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                                          |  | 56                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 4.                        |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                             |  | 57                  
|                               | 
|PART II  OTHER INFORMATION    |  |                                                                                                                                    
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 1.                        |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                                   |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 1A.                       |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                                        |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 2.                        |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                                         |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 3.                        |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                                     |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 4.                        |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                                 |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 5.                        |  | Other Information                                                                                                                   |  | 58                  
|                               |  |                                                                                                                                    
|Item 6.                        |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                            |  | 58                  
|                               | 
|SIGNATURE                      |  | 59                                                                                                                                 



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|Item 1. | Financial Statements
|------- | --------------------

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

(in thousands, except unit data)



|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------- | --------- | - | ---- | --------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  | 2007        |           |   | 2006 |          
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  | (unaudited) |           |   |      |          
|Assets                                                                                                                                                             |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Real estate investments at cost:                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Land                                                                                                                                                               |  | $           | 942,792   |   |      | 862,851   |  
|Buildings and improvements                                                                                                                                         |  |             | 2,048,713 |   |      | 1,963,634 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             | 2,991,505 |   |      | 2,826,485 |  
|Less: accumulated depreciation                                                                                                                                     |  |             | 478,560   |   |      | 427,389   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             | 2,512,945 |   |      | 2,399,096 |  
|Properties in development                                                                                                                                          |  |             | 895,554   |   |      | 615,450   |  
|Operating properties held for sale                                                                                                                                 |  |             | 7,904     |   |      | 25,608    |  
|Investments in real estate partnerships                                                                                                                            |  |             | 446,653   |   |      | 434,090   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Net real estate investments                                                                                                                                        |  |             | 3,863,056 |   |      | 3,474,244 |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                          |  |             | 33,571    |   |      | 34,046    |  
|Notes receivable                                                                                                                                                   |  |             | 20,337    |   |      | 19,988    |  
|Tenant receivables, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $3,117 and $3,961 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively                     |  |             | 65,634    |   |      | 67,162    |  
|Deferred costs, less accumulated amortization of $41,433 and $36,227 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively                                     |  |             | 51,533    |   |      | 40,989    |  
|Acquired lease intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $13,677 and $10,511 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively                   |  |             | 18,466    |   |      | 12,315    |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                                       |  |             | 40,488    |   |      | 23,041    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  | $           | 4,093,085 |   |      | 3,671,785 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Liabilities and Partners Capital                                                                                                                                  |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Liabilities:                                                                                                                                                       |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Notes payable                                                                                                                                                      |  |             | 1,842,030 |   |      | 1,454,386 |  
|Unsecured line of credit                                                                                                                                           |  |             | 110,000   |   |      | 121,000   |  
|Accounts payable and other liabilities                                                                                                                             |  |             | 185,428   |   |      | 140,940   |  
|Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net                                                                                                                         |  |             | 10,977    |   |      | 7,729     |  
|Tenants security and escrow deposits                                                                                                                              |  |             | 10,898    |   |      | 10,517    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                                  |  |             | 2,159,333 |   |      | 1,734,572 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Limited partners interest in consolidated partnerships                                                                                                            |  |             | 14,544    |   |      | 17,797    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Commitments and contingencies                                                                                                                                      |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |            
|Partners Capital:                                                                                                                                                 |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Series D preferred units, par value $100: 500,000 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006                                         |  |             | 49,158    |   |      | 49,158    |  
|Preferred units of general partner, par value $0.01: 800,000 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, liquidation preference $250 |  |             | 275,000   |   |      | 275,000   |  
|General partner; 69,614,159 and 69,017,995 units outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively                                             |  |             | 1,602,106 |   |      | 1,591,634 |  
|Limited partners; 482,111 and 740,826 units outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively                                                  |  |             | 10,974    |   |      | 16,941    |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                                      |  |             | (18,030   | ) |      | (13,317   | )
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|Total partners capital                                                                                                                                            |  |             | 1,919,208 |   |      | 1,919,416 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  | $           | 4,093,085 |   |      | 3,671,785 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |             |           |   |      |           |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands, except per unit data)

(unaudited)



|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                                                                        |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Revenues:                                                                                               |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Minimum rent                                                                                            |  | $    | 81,033  |   |      | 74,006  |  
|Percentage rent                                                                                         |  |      | 889     |   |      | 976     |  
|Recoveries from tenants                                                                                 |  |      | 24,269  |   |      | 22,308  |  
|Management, acquisition and other fees                                                                  |  |      | 10,789  |   |      | 5,327   |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                                          |  |      | 116,980 |   |      | 102,617 |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating expenses:                                                                                     |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                           |  |      | 24,364  |   |      | 21,384  |  
|Operating and maintenance                                                                               |  |      | 13,855  |   |      | 12,576  |  
|General and administrative                                                                              |  |      | 12,159  |   |      | 10,765  |  
|Real estate taxes                                                                                       |  |      | 11,608  |   |      | 10,230  |  
|Other expenses, net                                                                                     |  |      | 1,625   |   |      | (825    | )
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                                                |  |      | 63,611  |   |      | 54,130  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Other expense (income)                                                                                  |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Interest expense, net of interest income of $840 and $819 in 2007 and 2006, respectively                |  |      | 20,515  |   |      | 20,166  |  
|Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development                                      |  |      | (5,492  | ) |      | (15,414 | )
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total other expense (income)                                                                            |  |      | 15,023  |   |      | 4,752   |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income before minority interests and equity in income (loss) of investments in real estate partnerships |  |      | 38,346  |   |      | 43,735  |  
|Minority interest of limited partners                                                                   |  |      | (241    | ) |      | (16     | )
|Equity in income (loss) of investments in real estate partnerships                                      |  |      | 1,677   |   |      | 578     |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income from continuing operations                                                                       |  |      | 39,782  |   |      | 44,297  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |     
|Discontinued operations:                                                                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating income from discontinued operations                                                           |  |      | 177     |   |      | 1,411   |  
|Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development                                      |  |      | 3,162   |   |      | 27      |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income from discontinued operations                                                                     |  |      | 3,339   |   |      | 1,438   |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income                                                                                              |  |      | 43,121  |   |      | 45,735  |  
|Preferred unit distributions                                                                            |  |      | (5,850  | ) |      | (5,850  | )
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders                                                                      |  | $    | 37,271  |   |      | 39,885  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income per common unit - basic:                                                                         |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Continuing operations                                                                                   |  | $    | 0.48    |   |      | 0.55    |  
|Discontinued operations                                                                                 |  |      | 0.05    |   |      | 0.02    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                                             |  | $    | 0.53    |   |      | 0.57    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income per common unit - diluted:                                                                       |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Continuing operations                                                                                   |  | $    | 0.48    |   |      | 0.55    |  
|Discontinued operations                                                                                 |  |      | 0.05    |   |      | 0.02    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                                             |  | $    | 0.53    |   |      | 0.57    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands, except per unit data)

(unaudited)



|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                                                                 |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Revenues:                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Minimum rent                                                                                     |  | $    | 236,206 |   |      | 218,961 |  
|Percentage rent                                                                                  |  |      | 1,965   |   |      | 1,902   |  
|Recoveries from tenants                                                                          |  |      | 69,324  |   |      | 62,216  |  
|Management, acquisition and other fees                                                           |  |      | 24,667  |   |      | 24,728  |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                                   |  |      | 332,162 |   |      | 307,807 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating expenses:                                                                              |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                    |  |      | 67,803  |   |      | 62,406  |  
|Operating and maintenance                                                                        |  |      | 40,214  |   |      | 36,160  |  
|General and administrative                                                                       |  |      | 37,363  |   |      | 32,398  |  
|Real estate taxes                                                                                |  |      | 34,501  |   |      | 31,366  |  
|Other expenses                                                                                   |  |      | 3,346   |   |      | 4,565   |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                                         |  |      | 183,227 |   |      | 166,895 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Other expense (income):                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Interest expense, net of interest income of $2,370 and $3,347 in 2007 and 2006, respectively     |  |      | 60,215  |   |      | 59,264  |  
|Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development                               |  |      | (34,586 | ) |      | (40,687 | )
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total other expense (income)                                                                     |  |      | 25,629  |   |      | 18,577  |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income before minority interests and equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships |  |      | 123,306 |   |      | 122,335 |  
|Minority interest of limited partners                                                            |  |      | (757    | ) |      | (4,791  | )
|Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships                                      |  |      | 6,245   |   |      | 995     |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income from continuing operations                                                                |  |      | 128,794 |   |      | 118,539 |  
|Discontinued operations, net:                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating income from discontinued operations                                                    |  |      | 1,406   |   |      | 4,542   |  
|Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development                               |  |      | 22,035  |   |      | 34,010  |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income from discontinued operations                                                              |  |      | 23,441  |   |      | 38,552  |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income                                                                                       |  |      | 152,235 |   |      | 157,091 |  
|Preferred unit distributions                                                                     |  |      | (17,550 | ) |      | (17,550 | )
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders                                                               |  | $    | 134,685 |   |      | 139,541 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income per common unit - basic:                                                                  |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Continuing operations                                                                            |  | $    | 1.59    |   |      | 1.45    |  
|Discontinued operations                                                                          |  |      | 0.34    |   |      | 0.56    |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                                      |  | $    | 1.93    |   |      | 2.01    |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income per common unit - diluted:                                                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Continuing operations                                                                            |  | $    | 1.58    |   |      | 1.44    |  
|Discontinued operations                                                                          |  |      | 0.34    |   |      | 0.56    |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                                      |  | $    | 1.92    |   |      | 2.00    |  
|                                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners Capital and Comprehensive Income
(Loss)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007

(in thousands)

(unaudited)



|                                                                                      |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | ------ | - | ---------------------------------------- | --------- | - | --------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------------------------ | ------- | - | --------------------- | --------- | -
|                                                                                      |  | Preferred Units |        |   | General PartnerPreferred andCommon Units |           |   | LimitedPartners |        |   | AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss) |         |   | TotalPartnersCapital |          
|Balance at December 31, 2006                                                          |  | $               | 49,158 |   |                                          | 1,866,634 |   |                 | 16,941 |   |                                            | (13,317 | ) |                       | 1,919,416 |  
|Comprehensive income:                                                                 |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       |           |  
|Net income                                                                            |  |                 | 2,794  |   |                                          | 148,171   |   |                 | 1,270  |   |                                            |        |   |                       | 152,235   |  
|Amortization of loss on derivative instruments                                        |  |                 |       |   |                                          |          |   |                 |       |   |                                            | 980     |   |                       | 980       |  
|Change in fair value of derivative instruments                                        |  |                 |       |   |                                          |          |   |                 |       |   |                                            | (5,693  | ) |                       | (5,693    | )
|                                                                                      |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       |           |  
|Total comprehensive income                                                            |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       | 147,522   |  
|Cash distributions to partners                                                        |  |                 |       |   |                                          | (137,450  | ) |                 | (1,425 | ) |                                            |        |   |                       | (138,875  | )
|Preferred unit distribution                                                           |  |                 | (2,794 | ) |                                          | (14,756   | ) |                 |       |   |                                            |        |   |                       | (17,550   | )
|Regency Restricted Stock issued, net of amortization                                  |  |                 |       |   |                                          | 13,526    |   |                 |       |   |                                            |        |   |                       | 13,526    |  
|Common Units issued as a result of common stock issued by Regency, net of repurchases |  |                 |       |   |                                          | (4,831    | ) |                 |       |   |                                            |        |   |                       | (4,831    | )
|Common Units exchanged for common stock of Regency                                    |  |                 |       |   |                                          | 8,241     |   |                 | (8,241 | ) |                                            |        |   |                       |          |  
|Reallocation of limited partners interest                                            |  |                 |       |   |                                          | (2,429    | ) |                 | 2,429  |   |                                            |        |   |                       |          |  
|                                                                                      |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       |           |  
|Balance at September 30, 2007                                                         |  | $               | 49,158 |   |                                          | 1,877,106 |   |                 | 10,974 |   |                                            | (18,030 | ) |                       | 1,919,208 |  
|                                                                                      |  |                 |        |   |                                          |           |   |                 |        |   |                                            |         |   |                       |           |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

(unaudited)



|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -------- | - | ---- | -------- | -
|                                                                                    |  | 2007 |          |   | 2006 |         
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                               |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net income                                                                          |  | $    | 152,235  |   |      | 157,091  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                       |  |      | 67,916   |   |      | 65,152   |  
|Deferred loan cost and debt premium amortization                                    |  |      | 2,612    |   |      | 2,830    |  
|Stock based compensation                                                            |  |      | 14,595   |   |      | 13,565   |  
|Minority interest of limited partners                                               |  |      | 757      |   |      | 4,791    |  
|Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships                         |  |      | (6,245   | ) |      | (995     | )
|Net gain on sale of properties                                                      |  |      | (56,622  | ) |      | (74,697  | )
|Provision for loss on operating properties                                          |  |      |         |   |      | 500      |  
|Distribution of earnings from operations of investments in real estate partnerships |  |      | 24,043   |   |      | 24,205   |  
|Changes in assets and liabilities:                                                  |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Tenant receivables                                                                  |  |      | 346      |   |      | 2,151    |  
|Deferred leasing costs                                                              |  |      | (6,608   | ) |      | (5,693   | )
|Other assets                                                                        |  |      | (20,950  | ) |      | (17,110  | )
|Accounts payable and other liabilities                                              |  |      | 5,620    |   |      | (8,159   | )
|Above and below market lease intangibles, net                                       |  |      | (1,332   | ) |      | (995     | )
|Tenants security and escrow deposits                                               |  |      | 255      |   |      | 562      |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                           |  |      | 176,622  |   |      | 163,198  |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                               |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Acquisition of operating real estate                                                |  |      | (63,117  | ) |      | (19,337  | )
|Development of real estate including acquisition of land                            |  |      | (481,790 | ) |      | (305,446 | )
|Proceeds from sale of real estate investments                                       |  |      | 211,024  |   |      | 308,354  |  
|Repayment of notes receivable, net                                                  |  |      | 530      |   |      | 14,753   |  
|Investments in real estate partnerships                                             |  |      | (34,476  | ) |      | (15,772  | )
|Distributions received from investments in real estate partnerships                 |  |      | 11,065   |   |      | 11,178   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                               |  |      | (356,764 | ) |      | (6,270   | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                               |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net proceeds from Common Units issued as a result of Common stock issued by Regency |  |      | 2,372    |   |      | 2,791    |  
|Distributions to limited partners in consolidated partnerships, net                 |  |      | (4,120   | ) |      | (2,326   | )
|Distributions paid to preferred unit holders                                        |  |      | (11,700  | ) |      | (11,700  | )
|Cash distributions to partners                                                      |  |      | (135,757 | ) |      | (121,236 | )
|Proceeds from issuance of fixed rate unsecured notes                                |  |      | 398,108  |   |      |         |  
|Repayment of unsecured line of credit, net                                          |  |      | (11,000  | ) |      | (4,000   | )
|Repayment of notes payable                                                          |  |      | (49,243  | ) |      | (21,208  | )
|Scheduled principal payments                                                        |  |      | (3,318   | ) |      | (3,338   | )
|Deferred loan costs                                                                 |  |      | (5,675   | ) |      | (9       | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                                 |  |      | 179,667  |   |      | (161,026 | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                           |  |      | (475     | ) |      | (4,098   | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period                                |  |      | 34,046   |   |      | 42,458   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period                                      |  | $    | 33,571   |   |      | 38,360   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |          |   |      |          |  



5



---

##### Table of Contents

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands)



|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------
|                                                                                                           |  | 2007 |        | 2006
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                                                          |  |      |        |      |       
|                                                                                                           |  |     
|Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest of $26,070 and $16,931 in 2007 and 2006, respectively) |  | $    | 66,232 |      | 73,987
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Preferred unit and stock distributions declared and not paid                                               |  | $    | 5,850  |      | 5,850 
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:                                                          |  |      |        |      |       
|                                                                                                           |  |     
|Regency common stock issued for partnership units exchanged                                                |  | $    | 8,241  |      | 20,506
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Mortgage loans assumed for the acquisition of real estate, at fair value                                   |  | $    | 42,272 |      | 44,000
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Real estate contributed as investments in real estate partnerships                                         |  | $    | 5,318  |      | 7,573 
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Common stock issued for dividend reinvestment plan                                                         |  | $    | 3,117  |      | 2,886 
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Notes receivable taken in connection with sales of properties in development and out-parcels               |  | $    | 879    |      | 2,401 
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Change in fair value of derivative instrument                                                              |  | $    | 5,693  |      | 2,621 
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |       

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|-- | ------------------------------------------



| | (a) | Organization and Principles of Consolidation
| | --- | --------------------------------------------

General

Regency Centers Corporation (Regency or the Company) began its operations as a Real Estate
Investment Trust (REIT) in 1993, and is the managing general partner of its operating partnership, Regency Centers, L.P. (RCLP or the Partnership). Regency currently owns approximately 99% of the outstanding
common partnership units (Units) of the Partnership. Regency engages in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, and development of retail shopping centers through the Partnership, and has no other assets or liabilities other
than through its investment in the Partnership. At September 30, 2007, the Partnership directly owned 228 retail shopping centers and held partial interests in an additional 219 retail shopping centers through investments in joint ventures.

Consolidation

The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and joint ventures in which the Partnership has a controlling interest. The equity interests of third parties
held in the Partnership or its controlled joint ventures are included in the consolidated financial statements as preferred units, exchangeable operating partnership units or limited partners interest in consolidated partnerships. All
significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Investments in real
estate partnerships not controlled by the Partnership (Unconsolidated Joint Ventures) are accounted for under the equity method. The Partnership has evaluated its investment in the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and has concluded that
they are not variable interest entities as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R). Further, the venture
partners in the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures have significant ownership rights, including approval over operating budgets and strategic plans, capital spending, sale or financing, and admission of new partners; therefore, the Partnership has
concluded that the equity method of accounting is appropriate for these interests as they do not require consolidation under EITF Issue No. 04-5 Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited
Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights or the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures
(SOP 78-9). Under the equity method of accounting, investments in the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures are initially recorded at cost, and subsequently increased for additional contributions and allocations of income and reduced for
distributions received and allocation of losses. These investments are included in the consolidated financial statements as Investments in real estate partnerships.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (a) | Organization and Principles of Consolidation (continued)
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------



Ownership of the Company

Regency has a single class of common stock outstanding and three series of preferred stock outstanding (Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Stock). The dividends
on the Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Stock are cumulative and payable in arrears on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Company owns corresponding Series 3, 4, and 5 preferred unit interests (Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Units) in
the Partnership that entitle the Company to income and distributions from the Partnership in amounts equal to the dividends paid on the Companys Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Stock.

Ownership of the Operating Partnership

The Partnerships capital includes general and limited common Partnership Units, Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Units owned by the Company, and Series D Preferred Units owned by institutional investors.

At September 30, 2007, the Company owned approximately 99% or 69,614,159 Partnership Units of the total 70,096,270 Partnership Units outstanding.
Each outstanding common Partnership Unit not owned by the Company is exchangeable for one share of Regency common stock. The Company revalues the minority interest associated with the Partnership Units each quarter to maintain a proportional
relationship between the book value of equity associated with common stockholders relative to that of the Unit holders since both have equivalent rights and Partnership Units are convertible into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Net income and distributions of the Partnership are allocable first to the Preferred Units, and the remaining amounts to the general and
limited partners Units in accordance with their ownership percentage. The Series 3, 4, and 5 Preferred Units owned by the Company are eliminated in consolidation.



| | (b) | Revenues
| | --- | --------

The Partnership leases space to tenants under
agreements with varying terms. Leases are accounted for as operating leases with minimum rent recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease regardless of when payments are due. Accrued rents are included in tenant receivables. As
part of the leasing process, the Partnership may provide the lessee with an allowance for the construction of leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are capitalized as part of the building, recorded as tenant improvements, and depreciated
over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the lease term. If the allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event the Partnership is not considered the owner of the
improvements, the allowance is considered to be a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue. Factors considered during this evaluation include, among others, who holds legal title to the improvements as
well as other controlling rights provided by the lease agreement (e.g. unilateral control of the tenant space during the build-out process). Determination of the appropriate accounting for a payment for a tenant allowance is made on a lease-by-lease
basis, considering the facts and circumstances of the individual tenant lease.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (b) | Revenues (continued)
| | --- | --------------------



Lease revenue recognition commences when the lessee is given possession of the leased space upon
completion of tenant improvements when the Partnership is the owner of the leasehold improvements; however, when the leasehold improvements are owned by the tenant, the lease inception date is when the tenant obtains possession of the leased space
for purposes of constructing its leasehold improvements.

Substantially all of the lease agreements contain provisions that provide for
additional rents based on tenants sales volume (percentage rent) and reimbursement of the tenants share of real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance (CAM) costs.

Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. Recovery of real estate taxes,
insurance, and CAM costs are recognized as the respective costs are incurred in accordance with the lease agreements.

The Partnership
accounts for profit recognition on sales of real estate in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. In summary, profits from sales will not be
recognized under the full accrual method by the Partnership unless a sale has been consummated; the buyers initial and continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; the Partnerships receivable, if
applicable, is not subject to future subordination; the Partnership has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership; and the Partnership does not have substantial continuing involvement with the property.

The Partnership has been engaged by joint ventures under agreements to provide asset management, property management, leasing, investing, and financing
services for such ventures shopping centers. The fees are market-based and generally calculated as a percentage of either revenues earned or the estimated values of the properties managed, and are recognized as services are rendered, when fees
due are determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.



| | (c) | Real Estate Investments
| | --- | -----------------------

Land, buildings, and improvements
are recorded at cost. All specifically identifiable costs related to development activities are capitalized into properties in development on the consolidated balance sheets. The capitalized costs include pre-development costs essential to the
development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, and direct employee costs incurred during the period of development.

The Partnership incurs costs prior to land acquisition including contract deposits, as well as legal, engineering, and other external professional fees related to evaluating the feasibility of developing a shopping
center. These pre-development costs are included in properties in development. If the Partnership determines that the development of a particular shopping center is no longer probable, any related pre-development costs previously incurred are
immediately expensed. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Partnership had capitalized pre-development costs of $24.5 million and $23.3 million, respectively of which $10.5 million and $10.0 million, respectively were
refundable deposits.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (c) | Real Estate Investments (continued)
| | --- | -----------------------------------



The Partnerships method of capitalizing interest is based upon applying its weighted average
borrowing rate to that portion of the actual development costs expended. The Partnership generally ceases interest cost capitalization when the property is available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but in no event
would the Partnership capitalize interest on the project beyond 12 months after substantial completion of the building shell.

Maintenance
and repairs that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the respective assets are recorded in operating and maintenance expense.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings and improvements, the minimum lease term for tenant improvements, and three to seven years for furniture and equipment.

The Partnership and the unconsolidated joint ventures allocate the purchase price of assets acquired (net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets) and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (Statement 141). Statement 141 provides guidance
on allocating a portion of the purchase price of a property to intangible assets. The Partnerships methodology for this allocation includes estimating an as-if vacant fair value of the physical property, which is allocated to land,
building, and improvements. The difference between the purchase price and the as-if vacant fair value is allocated to intangible assets. There are three categories of intangible assets to be considered: (i) value of in-place leases,
(ii) above and below-market value of in-place leases, and (iii) customer relationship value.

The value of in-place leases is
estimated based on the value associated with the costs avoided in originating leases compared to the acquired in-place leases as well as the value associated with lost rental and recovery revenue during the assumed lease-up period. The value of
in-place leases is recorded to amortization expense over the remaining initial term of the respective leases.

Above-market and below-market
in-place lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) managements estimate of fair market lease
rates for the comparable in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The value of above-market leases is amortized as a reduction of minimum rent over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
The value of below-market leases is accreted as an increase to minimum rent over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including below-market renewal options, if applicable.

The Partnership does not allocate value to customer relationship intangibles if it has pre-existing business relationships with the major retailers in the
acquired property since they do not provide incremental value over the Partnerships existing relationships.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (c) | Real Estate Investments (continued)
| | --- | -----------------------------------



The Partnership follows the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (Statement 144). In accordance with Statement 144, the Partnership classifies an operating property or a property in development as held-for-sale when it determines that the property is available for
immediate sale in its present condition, the property is being actively marketed for sale, and management believes it is probable that a sale will be consummated. Given the nature of all real estate sales contracts, it is not unusual for such
contracts to allow potential buyers a period of time to evaluate the property prior to formal acceptance of the contract. In addition, certain other matters critical to the final sale, such as financing arrangements, often remain pending even upon
contract acceptance. As a result, properties under contract may not close within the expected time period, or may not close at all. Due to these uncertainties, it is not likely that the Partnership can meet the criteria of Statement 144 prior to the
sale formally closing. Therefore, any properties categorized as held-for-sale represent only those properties that management has determined are probable to close within the requirements set forth in Statement 144. Operating properties held-for-sale
are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the held-for-sale period.

In accordance with Statement 144, when the Partnership sells a property or classifies a property as held-for-sale and will not have continuing involvement or significant cash flows after disposition, the operations and cash flows of the
property are eliminated from continuing operations. Its operations, including any mortgage interest and gain on sale, are reported in discontinued operations so that the operations and cash flows are clearly distinguished. Once classified in
discontinued operations, these properties are eliminated from ongoing operations. Prior periods are also re-presented to reflect the operations of these properties as discontinued operations. When the Partnership sells operating properties to its
joint ventures or to third parties, and will have continuing involvement, the operations and gains on sales are included in income from continuing operations.

The Partnership reviews its real estate portfolio for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable based upon expected undiscounted cash flows from
the property. The Partnership determines impairment by comparing the propertys carrying value to an estimate of fair value based upon varying methods such as i) estimating future discounted cash flows, ii) determining resale values by market,
or iii) applying a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods of determining fair value can fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the general economy
of those markets in which the Partnership operates, tenant credit quality, and demand for new retail stores. In the event that the carrying amount of a property is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value, the Partnership will write down the asset
to fair value for held-and-used assets and to fair value less costs to sell for held-for-sale assets. If there was an impairment recorded on properties subsequently sold to third parties it would be included in operating
income from discontinued operations.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (d) | Income Taxes
| | --- | ------------

The Partnerships taxable income and
loss is reported by its partners, of which the Company as general partner and 99% owner, is allocated its pro-rata share of tax attributes.

The Company believes it qualifies, and intends to continue to qualify, as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). As a REIT, the Company will generally not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions
to its stockholders are at least equal to REIT taxable income.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to stockholders, differs from net income reported for financial reporting purposes primarily because of differences in depreciable lives and cost bases
of the shopping centers, as well as other timing differences.

Regency Realty Group, Inc. (RRG), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
RCLP, is a Taxable REIT Subsidiary as defined in Section 856(l) of the Code. RRG is subject to federal and state income taxes and files separate tax returns. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Partnership recorded a tax
benefit of $712,680 as compared to tax expense of $1.6 million for the same period in the prior year.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax
law. This Interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Under FIN 48, tax
positions shall initially be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and relevant facts.The Partnership adopted this Interpretation
effective January 1, 2007 and the adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial statements.



| | (e) | Deferred Costs
| | --- | --------------

Deferred costs include leasing costs and
loan costs, net of accumulated amortization. Such costs are amortized over the periods through lease expiration or loan maturity, respectively. Deferred leasing costs consist of internal and external commissions associated with leasing the
Partnerships shopping centers. Net deferred leasing costs were $39.4 million and $33.3 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Deferred loan costs consist of initial direct and incremental costs associated
with financing activities. Net deferred loan costs were $12.1 million and $7.7 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (f) | Earnings per Unit and Treasury Stock
| | --- | ------------------------------------

The Partnership
calculates earnings per unit in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share (Statement 128). Basic earnings per unit is computed based upon the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per unit reflects the conversion of obligations and the assumed exercises of securities including the effects of units issuable under the Partnerships share-based payment arrangements, if dilutive. See Note 11 for the
calculation of earnings per unit (EPU).

Repurchases of the Companys common stock are recorded at cost and are reflected
as Treasury stock in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and recorded in General Partner Preferred and Common Units of the Partnerships consolidated statement of changes in partners
capital and comprehensive income (loss). Outstanding shares do not include treasury shares. Concurrent with the Treasury stock repurchases by Regency, the Partnership repurchases the same amount of general partnership units from Regency.



| | (g) | Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | --- | -------------------------

Any instruments which have an
original maturity of 90 days or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash distributions of normal operating earnings from investments in real estate partnerships are included in cash flows from operations in the consolidated
statements of cash flows. Cash distributions from the sale or loan proceeds from the placement of debt on a property included in investments in real estate partnerships are included in cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated
statements of cash flows.



| | (h) | Estimates
| | --- | ---------

The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the Partnerships management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



| | (i) | Stock-Based Compensation
| | --- | ------------------------

Regency grants stock-based
compensation to its employees and directors. When Regency issues common shares as compensation, it receives a comparable number of common units from the Partnership including stock options. Regency is committed to contribute to the Partnership all
proceeds from the exercise of stock options or other stock-based awards granted under Regencys Long-Term Omnibus Plan (the Plan). Accordingly, Regencys ownership in the Partnership will increase based on the amount of
proceeds contributed to the Partnership for the common units it receives. As a result of the issuance of common units to Regency for stock-based compensation, the Partnership accounts for stock-based compensation in the same manner as Regency.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (i) | Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
| | --- | ------------------------------------



The Partnership recognizes stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R)
Share-Based Payment (Statement 123(R)). The Partnership early adopted Statement 123(R) effective January 1, 2005 by applying the modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning
with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to
the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. See Note 10 for further discussion.



| | (j) | Segment Reporting
| | --- | -----------------

The Partnerships business is
investing in retail shopping centers through direct ownership or through joint ventures. The Partnership actively manages its portfolio of retail shopping centers and may from time to time make decisions to sell lower performing properties or
developments not meeting its long-term investment objectives. The proceeds from sales are reinvested into higher quality retail shopping centers through acquisitions or new developments, which management believes will meet its planned rate of
return. It is managements intent that all retail shopping centers will be owned or developed for investment purposes; however, the Partnership may decide to sell all or a portion of a development upon completion. The Partnerships revenue
and net income are generated from the operation of its investment portfolio. The Partnership also earns fees from third parties for services provided to manage and lease retail shopping centers owned through joint ventures.

The Partnerships portfolio is located throughout the United States; however, management does not distinguish or group its operations on a
geographical basis for purposes of allocating resources or measuring performance. The Partnership reviews operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis, therefore, the Partnership defines an operating segment as its
individual properties. No individual property constitutes more than 10% of the Partnerships combined revenue, net income or assets, and thus the individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment based upon their
similarities with regard to both the nature and economics of the centers, tenants and operational processes, as well as long-term average financial performance. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 6% or more of revenue and none of the
shopping centers are located outside the United States.



| | (k) | Derivative Financial Instruments
| | --- | --------------------------------

The Partnership adopted
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Statement 133) as amended by SFAS No. 149. Statement 133 requires that all derivative instruments, whether designated in hedging
relationships or not, be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge
accounting. The Partnerships use of derivative financial instruments is normally to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or forecasted transaction through the use of interest rate swaps. The Partnership designates
these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (k) | Derivative Financial Instruments (continued)
| | --- | --------------------------------------------



Statement 133 requires that changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges be
recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) while the ineffective portion of the derivatives change in fair value be recognized in the income statement as interest expense. Upon the settlement of a hedge, gains and losses
associated with the transaction are recorded in OCI and amortized over the underlying term of the hedge transaction. The Partnership formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management
objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Partnership assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in
offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items.

In assessing the hedge, the Partnership uses standard market conventions and
techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, and termination costs at each balance sheet date. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.
See Note 8 for further discussion.



| | (l) | Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (Statement 150). Statement 150 affects the
accounting for certain financial instruments, which requires companies having consolidated entities with specified termination dates to treat minority owners interests in such entities as liabilities in an amount based on the fair value of the
entities. Although Statement 150 was originally effective July 1, 2003, the FASB has indefinitely deferred certain provisions related to classification and measurement requirements for mandatory redeemable financial instruments that become
subject to Statement 150 solely as a result of consolidation, including minority interests of entities with specified termination dates.

At
September 30, 2007, the Partnership held a majority interest in three consolidated entities with specified termination dates through 2049. The minority owners interests in these entities will be settled upon termination by distribution or
transfer of either cash or specific assets of the underlying entities. The estimated fair value of minority interests in entities with specified termination dates was approximately $8.7 million at September 30, 2007. Their related carrying
value is $1.8 million and $1.3 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively which is included within limited partners interest in consolidated partnerships in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
Partnership has no other financial instruments that are affected by Statement 150.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (m) | Recent Accounting Pronouncements
| | --- | --------------------------------

In February 2007, the
FASB Issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Statement 159). This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities. Statement 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, although early application is allowed. The Partnership does not believe that the adoption of
Statement 159 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157
Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
This Statement applies to accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except for share-based payments transactions under Statement 123(R). This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. As Statement 157 does not require any new fair value measurements or remeasurements of previously computed fair values, the Partnership does not believe adoption of this Statement will have a material effect
on its consolidated financial statements.



| | (n) | Reclassifications
| | --- | -----------------

Certain reclassifications have been
made to the 2006 amounts to conform to classifications adopted in 2007.



|2. | Real Estate Investments
|-- | -----------------------

During 2007, the Partnership
acquired five shopping centers for a purchase price of $106.0 million which included the assumption of $42.3 million in debt, net of a $1.2 million discount. In accordance with Statement 141, acquired lease intangible assets and acquired lease
intangible liabilities of $9.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively, were recorded for these acquisitions. The acquisitions were accounted for as a purchase business combination and their results of operations are included in the consolidated
financial statements from the date of acquisition.



|3. | Discontinued Operations
|-- | -----------------------

RCLP maintains a conservative
capital structure to fund its growth program without compromising its investment-grade ratings. This approach is founded on a self-funding business model which utilizes center recycling as a key component and requires ongoing monitoring
of each center to ensure that it meets RCLPs investment standards. This recycling strategy calls for the Partnership to sell properties that do not measure up to its standards and re-deploy the proceeds into new, higher-quality developments
and acquisitions that are expected to generate sustainable revenue growth and more attractive returns.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|3. | Discontinued Operations (continued)
|-- | -----------------------------------



During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Partnership sold 100% of its interest in
one property for net proceeds of $14.9 million. The combined operating income and gain from this property and the one property classified as held-for-sale were reclassified to discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in
discontinued operations, including properties sold in 2006, as well as the operating property held-for-sale were $406,439 and $3.8 million, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The operating income and gains from
properties included in discontinued operations are reported net of income taxes, if the property is sold out of RRG, and are as follows (in thousands):



|                             |  |                            |     |                          |       |                 |       |                          |   
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --- | ------------------------ | ----- | --------------- | ----- | ------------------------ | --
|                             |  | For the three months ended
|                             |  | September 30, 2007         |     | September 30, 2006      
|                             |  | OperatingIncome            |     | Gain onsale ofproperties |       | OperatingIncome |       | Gain onsale ofProperties
|Operations and gain          |  | $                          | 177 |                          | 3,162 |                 | 1,411 |                          | 27
|Less: Income taxes           |  |                            |    |                          |      |                 |      |                          |  
|                             |  |                            |     |                          |       |                 |       |                          |   
|Discontinued operations, net |  | $                          | 177 |                          | 3,162 |                 | 1,411 |                          | 27
|                             |  |                            |     |                          |       |                 |       |                          |   

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Partnership sold 100% of its interest in
five properties for net proceeds of $99.7 million. The combined operating income and gain from these properties and the one property classified as held-for-sale were reclassified to discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in
discontinued operations, including properties sold in 2006, as well as the operating property held-for-sale, were $3.4 million and $12.6 million, respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The operating income and gains
from properties included in discontinued operations are reported net income taxes, if the property is sold out of RRG, and are as follows (in thousands):



|                             |  |                           |       |                          |        |                 |       |                          |       
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------ | ------ | --------------- | ----- | ------------------------ | ------
|                             |  | For the nine months ended
|                             |  | September 30, 2007        |       | September 30, 2006      
|                             |  | OperatingIncome           |       | Gain onsale ofproperties |        | OperatingIncome |       | Gain onsale ofProperties
|Operations and gain          |  | $                         | 1,406 |                          | 22,035 |                 | 4,542 |                          | 34,010
|Less: Income taxes           |  |                           |      |                          |       |                 |      |                          |      
|                             |  |                           |       |                          |        |                 |       |                          |       
|Discontinued operations, net |  | $                         | 1,406 |                          | 22,035 |                 | 4,542 |                          | 34,010
|                             |  |                           |       |                          |        |                 |       |                          |       



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|4. | Investments in Real Estate Partnerships
|-- | ---------------------------------------

The Partnership
accounts for all investments in which it owns 50% or less and does not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. The Partnership has determined that these investments are not variable interest entities as defined in FIN 46(R)
and do not require consolidation under EITF 04-5 or SOP 78-9, and therefore are subject to the voting interest model in determining its basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property acquisitions and dispositions, financings, annual
budgets, and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval of all partners. The Partnerships combined investment in these partnerships was $446.7 million and $434.1 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. Any difference between the carrying amount of these investments and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized or accreted to equity in income (loss) of investments in real estate partnerships over the expected useful lives of
the properties and other intangible assets which range in lives from 10 to 40 years. Net income or loss from these partnerships, which includes all operating results and gains on sales of properties within the joint ventures, is allocated to the
Partnership in accordance with the respective partnership agreements. Such allocations of net income or loss are recorded in equity in income (loss) of investments in real estate partnerships in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.

Investments in real estate partnerships are comprised primarily of joint ventures with three unrelated co-investment partners
and a recently formed open-end real estate fund (Regency Retail Partners or the Fund), as further described below. In addition to the Partnership earning its pro-rata share of net income (loss) in each of the partnerships,
these partnerships pay the Partnership fees for asset management, property management, leasing, investment, and financing services. During the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received fees from these joint
ventures of $10.7 million and $5.2 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received fees from these joint ventures of $24.4 million and $24.2 million, respectively.

The Partnership co-invests with the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund in three joint ventures (collectively Columbia) in which the
Partnership has ownership interests of 20% or 30%. As of September 30, 2007, Columbia owned 21 shopping centers, had total assets of $570.8 million and net income of $9.7 million for the nine months ended of which the Partnerships share
of the ventures total assets and net income was $126.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively. During 2007, Columbia purchased one shopping center from a third party for $12.0 million which was net of $8.1 million of assumed mortgage debt by
Columbia and the Partnership contributed $2.4 million for its pro-rata share of the purchase price.

The Partnership co-invests with the
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) in a joint venture (RegCal) in which the Partnership has an ownership interest of 25%. As of September 30, 2007, RegCal owned eight shopping centers, had total
assets of $167.7 million and net income of $2.4 million for the nine months ended of which the Partnerships share of the ventures total assets and net income was $41.9 million and $547,808, respectively. During 2007, CalSTRS sold one
shopping center to an unrelated party for $13.2 million for a gain of $1.4 million.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|4. | Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



The Partnership co-invests with Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia (MCW) in five
joint ventures, two in which the Partnership has an ownership interest of 25% (collectively, MCWR I), two in which it has an ownership interest of 24.95% (collectively, MCWR II), and one in which it has an ownership interest
of 16.35% (MCWR-DESCO).

As of September 30, 2007, MCWR I owned 50 shopping centers, had total assets of $702.3 million,
and net income of $15.6 million for the nine months ended of which the Partnerships share of the ventures total assets and net income was $175.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively. During 2007, MCWR I purchased one shopping center
from a third party for $23.0 million, net of $10.8 million of assumed mortgage debt, and the Partnership contributed $5.8 million for its pro-rata share of the purchase price. During 2007, MCWR I sold one shopping center to an unrelated party for
$33.4 million for a gain of $7.9 million.

On June 1, 2005, MCWR II closed on the acquisition of a retail shopping center portfolio
(the First Washington Portfolio) for a purchase price of approximately $2.8 billion, including the assumption of approximately $68.6 million of mortgage debt and the issuance of approximately $1.6 billion of new mortgage loans on the
properties acquired. The First Washington Portfolio acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination by MCWR II. At December 31, 2005, MCWR II was owned 64.95% by an affiliate of MCW, 34.95% by RCLP and 0.1% by Macquarie-Regency
Management, LLC (US Manager). US Manager is owned 50% by RCLP and 50% by an affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited. On January 13, 2006, the Partnership sold a portion of its investment in MCWR II to MCW which reduced its ownership
interest from 35% to 24.95% for net cash of $113.2 million which is reflected in proceeds from sale of real estate investments in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The proceeds from the sale were used to reduce the unsecured line of credit.

RCLP has the ability to receive additional acquisition fees of approximately $5.2 million (the Contingent Acquisition Fees)
deferred from the original acquisition date that are subject to achieving cumulative targeted income levels through 2008. The Contingent Acquisition Fees will only be recognized if earned, and the recognition of income will be limited to that
percentage of MCWR II, or 75.05%, of the joint venture not owned by the Partnership.

As of September 30, 2007, MCWR II owned 96
shopping centers, had total assets of $2.6 billion and recorded a net loss of $11.5 million for the nine months ended of which the Partnerships share of the ventures total assets and net loss was $655.1 million and $2.8 million,
respectively. As a result of the significant amount of depreciation and amortization expense recorded by MCWR II in connection with the acquisition of the First Washington Portfolio, the joint venture may continue to report a net loss in future
years, but is expected to produce positive cash flow from operations. During 2007, MCWR II sold one shopping center to an unrelated party for $13.5 million and for a gain of $566,490.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|4. | Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



On August 10, 2007, MCWR-DESCO closed on the acquisition of 32 retail centers for a purchase
price of approximately $396.2 million including debt of approximately $209.5 million. The Partnership contributed $29.7 million to the venture for its pro-rata share of the purchase price for its 16.35% equity ownership. MCWR-DESCO had total assets
of $421.1 million and a net loss of $1.6 million since inception, primarily related to depreciation and amortization expense. The Partnerships share of the ventures total assets and net loss was $68.9 million and $230,555, respectively.

In December 2006, RCLP formed Regency Retail Partners (the Fund), an open-end, infinite-life investment fund in which its
ownership interest was 26.8%. During the first quarter, the Partnership reduced its ownership interest to 20% with the admission of additional partners into the Fund and recognized a gain of $2.2 million that had previously been deferred. The Fund
will have the exclusive right to acquire all RCLP-developed large format community centers upon stabilization that meet the Funds investment criteria. As of September 30, 2007, the Fund owned five shopping centers, had total assets of
$152.5 million and recorded net income of $690,976 for the nine months ended of which the Partnerships share of the ventures total assets and net income was $30.4 million and $204,750, respectively. During 2007, the Fund acquired three
community shopping centers from the Partnership for a sales price of $69.9 million, for which the Partnership received cash of $64.5 million on a net basis after excluding RCLPs ownership interest, and recognized a gain of $24.2 million.

Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only that portion of the sales not attributable to the Partnerships
ownership interest. The gains, operations and cash flows are not recorded as discontinued operations because of RCLPs substantial continuing involvement in these shopping centers. Columbia, RegCal, and the joint ventures with MCW and the Fund
intend to continue to acquire retail shopping centers, some of which they may acquire directly from the Partnership. For those properties acquired from third parties, the Partnership is required to contribute its pro-rata share of the purchase price
to the joint ventures.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|4. | Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



Our investments in real estate partnerships as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
consist of the following (in thousands):



|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------- | - |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | -------
|                                                 |  | Ownership |   |  | 2007 |         | 2006
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR I)           |  | 25.00     | % |  | $    | 53,879  |      | 60,651 
|Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR I)            |  | 25.00     | % |  |      | 6,194   |      | 6,822  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)       |  | 24.95     | % |  |      | 220,406 |      | 234,378
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency III (MCWR II)      |  | 24.95     | % |  |      | 831     |      | 1,140  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency-DESCO (MCWR-DESCO) |  | 16.35     | % |  |      | 29,572  |      |       
|Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)      |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 35,762  |      | 36,096 
|Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)                   |  | 30.00     | % |  |      | 20,419  |      | 20,826 
|Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)          |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 12,447  |      | 11,516 
|RegCal, LLC (RegCal)                             |  | 25.00     | % |  |      | 17,284  |      | 18,514 
|Regency Retail Partners (the Fund)(1)            |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 10,541  |      | 5,139  
|Other investments in real estate partnerships    |  | 50.00     | % |  |      | 39,318  |      | 39,008 
|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        
|Total                                            |  |           |   |  | $    | 446,653 |      | 434,090
|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        

---

|(1) | At December 31, 2006, RCLPs ownership interest in the Fund was 26.8%.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis, is as follows (in
thousands):



|                                           |  |                   |           |                  |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | --------- | ---------------- | ---------
|                                           |  | September 30,2007 |           | December 31,2006
|Investment in real estate, net             |  | $                 | 4,402,475 |                  | 4,029,389
|Acquired lease intangible assets, net      |  |                   | 213,175   |                  | 200,835  
|Other assets                               |  |                   | 143,578   |                  | 135,451  
|                                           |  |                   |           |                  |          
|Total assets                               |  |                   | 4,759,228 |                  | 4,365,675
|                                           |  |                   |           |                  |          
|Notes payable                              |  |                   | 2,680,501 |                  | 2,435,229
|Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net |  |                   | 90,386    |                  | 69,336   
|Other liabilities                          |  |                   | 76,787    |                  | 70,295   
|Members capital                           |  |                   | 1,911,554 |                  | 1,790,815
|                                           |  |                   |           |                  |          
|Total liabilities and equity               |  | $                 | 4,759,228 |                  | 4,365,675
|                                           |  |                   |           |                  |          

Unconsolidated investments in real estate partnerships had notes payable of $2.7 billion and $2.4
billion as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively and the Partnerships proportionate share of these loans was $650.1 million and $610.8 million, respectively. The loans are primarily non-recourse, but for those
that are guaranteed by a joint venture, RCLPs liability does not extend beyond its ownership percentage of the joint venture.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|4. | Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



The revenues and expenses for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis are summarized as
follows (in thousands):



|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|----------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                              |  | For the three monthsended September 30, |         |   | For the nine monthsended September 30, |        
|                              |  | 2007                                    |         |   | 2006                                   |         |   | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Total revenues                |  | $                                       | 114,895 |   |                                        | 103,086 |   |      | 331,316 |   |      | 304,841 |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating expenses:           |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization |  |                                         | 45,467  |   |                                        | 42,080  |   |      | 131,250 |   |      | 130,444 |  
|Operating and maintenance     |  |                                         | 15,356  |   |                                        | 14,023  |   |      | 46,386  |   |      | 41,783  |  
|General and administrative    |  |                                         | 1,974   |   |                                        | 1,659   |   |      | 7,723   |   |      | 5,719   |  
|Real estate taxes             |  |                                         | 13,495  |   |                                        | 11,733  |   |      | 38,739  |   |      | 35,734  |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total operating expenses      |  |                                         | 76,292  |   |                                        | 69,495  |   |      | 224,098 |   |      | 213,680 |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Other expense (income):       |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Interest expense, net         |  |                                         | 34,513  |   |                                        | 31,965  |   |      | 100,106 |   |      | 93,666  |  
|Gain on sale of real estate   |  |                                         | (2,642  | ) |                                        | (1,906  | ) |      | (10,555 | ) |      | (6,806  | )
|Other expense (income)        |  |                                         | 35      |   |                                        | 40      |   |      | 103     |   |      | 127     |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total other expense (income)  |  |                                         | 31,906  |   |                                        | 30,099  |   |      | 89,654  |   |      | 86,987  |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income                    |  | $                                       | 6,697   |   |                                        | 3,492   |   |      | 17,564  |   |      | 4,174   |  
|                              |  |                                         |         |   |                                        |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  



|5. | Notes Receivable
|-- | ----------------

The Partnership has notes receivable
outstanding of $20.3 million and $20.0 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The notes bear interest ranging from 6.75% to 8.50% with maturity dates through November 2014.



|6. | Acquired Lease Intangibles
|-- | --------------------------

The Partnership has acquired
lease intangible assets of $18.5 million and $12.3 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, of which $17.9 million and $11.7 million, respectively relates to in-place leases. The aggregate amortization expense
recorded for these in-place leases was approximately $1.6 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense recorded for these in-place leases was approximately
$3.1 million and $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Partnership has above-market lease intangible assets of $584,307 recorded net of a reduction to minimum rent of $85,165 at September 30,
2007. The Partnership has acquired lease intangible liabilities of $11.0 million and $7.7 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, related to below-market rents recorded net of previously accreted minimum rent
of $5.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|7. | Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit
|-- | ------------------------------------------

The
Partnerships outstanding debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consists of the following (in thousands):



|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | ---------
|                             |  | 2007 |           | 2006
|Notes Payable:               |  |      |           |      |          
|Fixed rate mortgage loans    |  | $    | 211,346   |      | 186,897  
|Variable rate mortgage loans |  |      | 33,541    |      | 68,662   
|Fixed rate unsecured loans   |  |      | 1,597,143 |      | 1,198,827
|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|Total notes payable          |  |      | 1,842,030 |      | 1,454,386
|Unsecured Line of Credit     |  |      | 110,000   |      | 121,000  
|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|Total                        |  | $    | 1,952,030 |      | 1,575,386
|                             |  |      |           |      |          

On June 5, 2007, RCLP completed the sale of $400 million of ten-year senior unsecured notes.
The 5.875% notes are due June 15, 2017 and were priced at 99.527% to yield 5.938%. The net proceeds were used to reduce the unsecured line of credit (the Line).

In February 2007, RCLP entered into a new loan agreement under the Line with a commitment of $600 million and the right to expand the Line by an
additional $150 million subject to additional lender syndication. The Line has a four-year term which expires in 2011 with a one-year extension at the Partnerships option and the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR plus .55%. Contractual
interest rates were 6.238% at September 30, 2007 and 6.125% at December 31, 2006 based on LIBOR plus .55% and .75%, respectively. The balance on the Line was $110.0 million at September 30, 2007.

The spread paid on the Line is dependent upon the Partnership maintaining specific investment-grade ratings. The Partnership is also required to comply,
and is in compliance, with certain financial covenants such as Minimum Net Worth, Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value (GAV) and Recourse Secured Debt to GAV, Fixed Charge Coverage and other covenants customary with this type of
unsecured financing. The Line is used primarily to finance the acquisition and development of real estate, but is also available for general working-capital purposes.

Mortgage loans are secured by certain real estate properties and may be prepaid, but could be subject to a yield-maintenance premium or prepayment penalty. Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly installments of
principal and interest and mature over various terms through 2018. Variable interest rates on mortgage loans are currently based on LIBOR plus a spread in a range from 90 to 130 basis points. Fixed interest rates on mortgage loans range from 5.22%
to 8.95%. The Partnership intends to repay mortgage loans at maturity from proceeds from the Line.

The fair value of the Partnerships
variable rate notes payable and the Line are considered to approximate fair value, since the interest rates on such instruments re-price based on current market conditions. The fair value of fixed rate loans are estimated using cash flows discounted
at current market rates available to the Partnership for debt with similar terms and maturities. Fixed rate loans assumed in connection with real estate acquisitions are recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at fair value.
Based on the estimates used by the Partnership, the fair value of notes payable and the Line is approximately $2.0 billion at September 30, 2007.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|7. | Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit (continued)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------



As of September 30, 2007, scheduled principal repayments on notes payable and the Line were as
follows (in thousands):



|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | ------------------- | --------- | - | ------------- | --------- | -
|Scheduled Principal Payments by Year: |  | ScheduledPrincipalPayments |        | Term LoanMaturities |           |   | TotalPayments |          
|Current year                          |  | $                          | 1,094  |                     | 36,377    |   |               | 37,471    |  
|2008                                  |  |                            | 4,259  |                     | 19,620    |   |               | 23,879    |  
|2009                                  |  |                            | 4,338  |                     | 59,131    |   |               | 63,469    |  
|2010                                  |  |                            | 4,210  |                     | 177,231   |   |               | 181,441   |  
|2011 (includes the Line)              |  |                            | 4,273  |                     | 361,157   |   |               | 365,430   |  
|Beyond 5 Years                        |  |                            | 14,240 |                     | 1,266,154 |   |               | 1,280,394 |  
|Unamortized debt discounts            |  |                            |       |                     | (54       | ) |               | (54       | )
|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  
|Total                                 |  | $                          | 32,414 |                     | 1,919,616 |   |               | 1,952,030 |  
|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  



|8. | Derivative Financial Instruments
|-- | --------------------------------

The Partnership uses
derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures to interest rate risks. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Partnership may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time. None of the
Partnerships derivatives are designated as fair value hedges and the Partnership does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

On March 10, 2006, the Partnership entered into four forward-starting interest rate swaps totaling $396.7 million with fixed rates of 5.399%, 5.415%,
5.399%, and 5.415%. The Partnership designated these swaps as cash flow hedges to fix $400 million fixed rate financing expected to occur in 2010 and 2011. The change in fair value of these swaps from inception generated a liability of $8.6 million
at September 30, 2007, which is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

On
April 1, 2005, the Partnership entered into three forward-starting interest rate swaps of approximately $65.6 million each with fixed rates of 5.029%, 5.05%, and 5.05% to fix the rate on unsecured notes issued in July 2005. On July 13,
2005, the Partnership settled the swaps with a payment to the counter-parties for $7.3 million. During 2003, the Partnership entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps for a total of $144.2 million to fix the rate on a refinancing in
April 2004. On March 31, 2004, the Partnership settled these swaps with a payment to the counter-party for $5.7 million. The adjustment to interest expense recorded in 2007 related to the settlement of these swaps is $979,533 and the
unamortized balance at September 30, 2007 is $9.4 million.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|8. | Derivative Financial Instruments (continued)
|-- | --------------------------------------------



All of these swaps qualify for hedge accounting under Statement 133. Realized losses associated with
the swaps settled in 2005 and 2004 and unrealized gains or losses associated with the swaps entered into in 2006 have been included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss) and the Partnerships consolidated statement of changes in partners capital and comprehensive income (loss). The unamortized balance of the realized losses is being amortized as additional interest expense over
the ten year terms of the hedged loans. Unrealized gains or losses will not be amortized until such time that the expected debt issuance is completed in 2010 and 2011 as long as the swaps continue to qualify for hedge accounting.



|9. | Regencys Stockholders Equity and Partners Capital
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | Preferred Units
| | --- | ---------------

At September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the face value of the Series D Preferred Units was $50 million with a fixed distribution rate of 7.45% and recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets net of original issuance costs.

Terms and conditions for the Series D Preferred Units outstanding as of September 30, 2007 are summarized as follows:



|                  |  |                   |            |                  |       |   |                        |          |                            |         
|----------------- |  | ----------------- | ---------- | ---------------- | ----- | - | ---------------------- | -------- | -------------------------- | --------
|Units Outstanding |  | AmountOutstanding |            | DistributionRate |       |   | Callable byPartnership |          | Exchangeableby Unit holder
|500,000           |  | $                 | 50,000,000 |                  | 7.450 | % |                        | 09/29/09 |                            | 01/01/16

The Preferred Units, which may be called by RCLP at par beginning September 29, 2009, have no
stated maturity or mandatory redemption and pay a cumulative, quarterly dividend at a fixed rate. The Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holder for Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock) at an exchange rate of one
share for one unit. The Preferred Units and the related Preferred Stock are not convertible into common stock of the Company.



| | (b) | Preferred Units of General Partner and Regency Preferred Stock
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------

Terms and conditions of the three series of Preferred stock outstanding as of September 30, 2007 are summarized as follows:



|         |  |                   |  |                  |  |                       |             |                  |       |   |                        |         
|-------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------- |  | --------------------- | ----------- | ---------------- | ----- | - | ---------------------- | --------
|Series   |  | SharesOutstanding |  | DepositaryShares |  | LiquidationPreference |             | DistributionRate |       |   | Callable ByPartnership
|Series 3 |  | 300,000           |  | 3,000,000        |  | $                     | 75,000,000  |                  | 7.450 | % |                        | 04/03/08
|Series 4 |  | 500,000           |  | 5,000,000        |  |                       | 125,000,000 |                  | 7.250 | % |                        | 08/31/09
|Series 5 |  | 3,000,000         |  |                 |  |                       | 75,000,000  |                  | 6.700 | % |                        | 08/02/10
|         |  |                   |  |                  |  |                       |             |                  |       |   |                        |         
|         |  | 3,800,000         |  | 8,000,000        |  | $                     | 275,000,000 |                  |       |   |                        |         
|         |  |                   |  |                  |  |                       |             |                  |       |   |                        |         



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



| | (b) | Preferred Units of General Partner and Regency Preferred Stock (continued)
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



In 2005, the Company issued 3 million shares, or $75 million, of 6.70% Series 5 Preferred Stock
with a liquidation preference of $25 per share of which the proceeds were used to reduce the balance of the Line. The Series 3 and 4 depositary shares, which have a liquidation preference of $25, and the Series 5 preferred shares are perpetual, are
not convertible into common stock of the Company, and are redeemable at par upon Regencys election five years after the issuance date. None of the terms of the Preferred Stock contain any unconditional obligations that would require the
Company to redeem the securities at any time or for any purpose.



| | (c) | Common Stock
| | --- | ------------

On April 5, 2005, the Company entered
into an agreement to sell 4,312,500 shares of its common stock to an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) at $46.60 per share, in connection with a forward sale agreement (the Forward Sale Agreement). On
August 1, 2005, the Company issued 3,782,500 shares to Citigroup for net proceeds of approximately $175.5 million and on September 7, 2005, the remaining 530,000 shares were issued for net proceeds of $24.4 million. The proceeds from the
sales were used to reduce the Line and redeem the Series E and Series F Preferred Units.



|10. | Stock-Based Compensation
|--- | ------------------------

The Partnership recorded
stock-based compensation expense as follows, the components of which are further described below (in thousands):



|                                     |  |                                   |       |                                  |       |      |        |      |       
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ----- | -------------------------------- | ----- | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------
|                                     |  | For the three monthsSeptember 30, |       | For the nine monthsSeptember 30,
|                                     |  | 2007                              |       | 2006                             |       | 2007 |        | 2006
|Restricted stock                     |  | $                                 | 4,675 |                                  | 4,179 |      | 13,525 |      | 12,537
|Stock options                        |  |                                   | 256   |                                  | 240   |      | 768    |      | 720   
|Directors fees paid in common stock |  |                                   | 109   |                                  | 114   |      | 302    |      | 308   
|                                     |  |                                   |       |                                  |       |      |        |      |       
|Total                                |  | $                                 | 5,040 |                                  | 4,533 |      | 14,595 |      | 13,565
|                                     |  |                                   |       |                                  |       |      |        |      |       

The recorded amounts of stock-based compensation expense represent amortization of deferred
compensation related to share based payments in accordance with Statement 123(R). Compensation expense that is specifically identifiable to development activities is capitalized to the associated development project and is included above.

The Company established the Plan under which the Board of Directors may grant stock options and other stock-based awards to officers,
directors and other key employees. The Plan allows the Company to issue up to 5.0 million shares in the form of common stock or stock options, but limits the issuance of common stock excluding stock options to no more than 2.75 million
shares. At September 30, 2007, there were approximately 1.4 million shares available for grant under the Plan either through options or restricted stock. The Plan also limits outstanding awards to no more than 12% of outstanding common
stock.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|10. | Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
|--- | ------------------------------------



Stock options are granted under the Plan with an exercise price equal to the stocks fair market
value at the date of grant. All stock options granted have ten-year lives, contain vesting terms of one to five years from the date of grant and some have dividend equivalent rights. Stock options granted prior to 2005 also contained
reload rights, which allowed an option holder to receive new options each time existing options were exercised if the existing options were exercised under specific criteria provided for in the Plan. In January 2005, the Company acquired
the reload rights of existing employees stock options from the option holders by granting 771,645 options for an exercise price of $51.36, the fair value on the date of grant, and granted 7,906 restricted shares representing value
of $363,664, substantially canceling all of the reload rights on existing stock options. In March 2007, the Company acquired the reload rights of existing directors stock options from the option holders by granting
13,353 options for an average exercise price of $89.95, the fair value on the date of grant, and granted 1,654 restricted shares representing value of $148,725, canceling all of the reload rights on existing directors stock
options. These stock options and restricted shares vest 25% per year and are expensed over a four-year period beginning in year of grant in accordance with Statement 123(R). Options granted under the reload buy-out plan do not earn dividend
equivalents.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton closed-form (Black
Scholes) option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Companys stock and other factors. The Company uses historical data and other factors
to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to
be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of Statement 123(R) and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued. The following
table represents the assumptions used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for options granted during the following periods:



|                                                  |  |                       |   |              |      |   |               |      |   |                  |      |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | - | ------------ | ---- | - | ------------- | ---- | - | ---------------- | ---- | -
|                                                  |  | September 30,2007 (1) |   | June 30,2007 |      |   | March 31,2007 |      |   | December 31,2006 |     
|Per share weighted average value of stock options |  | $                     |  |              | 8.78 |   |               | 8.78 |   |                  | 8.35 |  
|Expected dividend yield                           |  |                       |  |              | 3.0  | % |               | 3.1  | % |                  | 3.8  | %
|Risk-free interest rate                           |  |                       |  |              | 4.7  | % |               | 4.9  | % |                  | 4.9  | %
|Expected volatility                               |  |                       |  |              | 19.8 | % |               | 19.8 | % |                  | 20.0 | %
|Expected life in years                            |  |                       |  |              | 2.7  |   |               | 2.7  |   |                  | 2.1  |  

---

|(1) | There were no options granted during the three months ended September 30,
2007.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|10. | Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
|--- | ------------------------------------



The following table reports stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2007:



|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | - |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------- | - | ------
|                                                |  | Number ofOptions |   |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |       | RemainingContractualTerm (in years) |     | IntrinsicValue (in thousands)
|OutstandingDecember 31, 2006                   |  | 1,195,551        |   |  | $                            | 48.90 |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Granted                                         |  | 17,122           |   |  |                              | 88.78 |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Exercised                                       |  | (465,704         | ) |  |                              | 48.56 |                                     |     |                               | $ | 19,914
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|OutstandingMarch 31, 2007                      |  | 746,969          |   |  | $                            | 50.02 |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Granted                                         |  | 671              |   |  |                              | 81.25 |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Exercised                                       |  | (2,820           | ) |  |                              | 45.96 |                                     |     |                               | $ | 96    
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|OutstandingJune 30, 2007                       |  | 744,820          |   |  | $                            | 50.07 |                                     |     |                               | $ |       
|Exercised                                       |  | (10,411          | ) |  |                              | 48.15 |                                     |     |                               | $ | 294   
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Forfeited                                       |  | (9,564           | ) |  |                              | 51.36 |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|OutstandingSeptember 30, 2007                  |  | 724,845          |   |  | $                            | 50.08 |                                     | 7.2 |                               | $ | 19,334
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|Vested and expected to vest September 30, 2007 |  | 710,349          |   |  | $                            | 50.10 |                                     | 7.2 |                               | $ | 18,932
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       
|ExercisableSeptember 30, 2007                  |  | 332,311          |   |  | $                            | 47.01 |                                     | 7.2 |                               | $ | 9,882 
|                                                |  |                  |   |  |                              |       |                                     |     |                               |   |       

As of September 30, 2007, there was $1.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options granted under the Plan expected to be recognized through 2009. The Company issues new shares to fulfill option exercises from its authorized shares available.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|10. | Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
|--- | ------------------------------------



The following table presents information regarding unvested option activity during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007:



|                                 |  |                            |  |                                     |     
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | ----
|                                 |  | Non-vestedNumber ofOptions |  | WeightedAverageGrant-DateFair Value
|Non-vested at January 1, 2007    |  | 568,771                    |  | $                                   | 5.90
|Granted                          |  | 17,793                     |  |                                     | 8.78
|Less: 2007 Vesting               |  | 194,030                    |  |                                     | 6.00
|                                 |  |                            |  |                                     |     
|Non-vested at September 30, 2007 |  | 392,534                    |  | $                                   | 6.04
|                                 |  |                            |  |                                     |     

The Company grants restricted stock under the Plan to its employees as a form of long-term
compensation and retention. The terms of each grant vary depending upon the participants responsibilities and position within the Company. The Companys stock grants to date can be categorized into three types: (a) 4-year vesting,
(b) performance-based vesting, and (c) 8-year cliff vesting.



| |  |  | The 4-year vesting grants vest 25% per year beginning in the year of grant. These grants are not subject to future performance measures.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Performance grants are earned subject to future performance measurements, which include individual performance measures, annual growth in earnings, compounded
three-year growth in earnings, and a three-year total shareholder return peer comparison (TSR Grant). Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, certain shares will vest immediately while
others will vest over an additional service period.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The 8-year cliff vesting grants fully vest at the end of the eighth year from the date of grant; however, as a result of the achievement of future performance,
primarily growth in earnings, the vesting of these grants may be accelerated over a shorter term.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Performance grants and
8-year cliff vesting grants are currently only granted to the Companys senior management. The Company considers the likelihood of meeting the performance criteria based upon managements estimates and analysis of future earnings growth
from which it determines the amounts recognized as expense on a periodic basis. The Company determines the grant date fair value of TSR Grants based upon a Monte Carlo Simulation model. Compensation expense is measured at the grant date and
recognized over the vesting period.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|10. | Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
|--- | ------------------------------------



The following table reports restricted stock activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2007:



|                                    |  |                 |  |                              |        |                           |   |      
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------- | - | -----
|                                    |  | Numberof Shares |  | IntrinsicValue(in thousands) |        | WeightedAverageGrantPrice
|Unvested at December 31, 2006       |  | 779,060         |  |                              |        |                           | $ | 51.67
|Shares Granted                      |  | 223,958         |  |                              |        |                           | $ | 84.66
|Less: Shares Vested and Distributed |  | 368,235         |  |                              |        |                           |   |      
|                                    |  |                 |  |                              |        |                           |   |      
|Unvested at September 30, 2007      |  | 634,783         |  | $                            | 48,720 |                           | $ | 68.73
|                                    |  |                 |  |                              |        |                           |   |      

The total intrinsic value of restricted stock vested during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $29.7 million. As of September 30, 2007, there was $25.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted under the Plan, which is recorded when recognized in additional paid
in capital of the consolidated statement of stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and the general partner preferred and common units column of the Partnerships consolidated statement of changes in partners capital and
comprehensive income (loss). This unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the next four years, through 2011.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|11. | Earnings per Unit
|--- | -----------------

The following summarizes the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively (in thousands except per unit data):



|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------
|                                                                                         |  | 2007 |        | 2006
|Numerator:                                                                               |  |      |        |      |       
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 39,782 |      | 44,297
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 3,339  |      | 1,438 
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income                                                                               |  |      | 43,121 |      | 45,735
|Less: Preferred unit distributions                                                       |  |      | 5,850  |      | 5,850 
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income for common unit holders                                                       |  |      | 37,271 |      | 39,885
|Less: Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock                                        |  |      | 261    |      | 307   
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income for common units holders - basic                                              |  |      | 37,010 |      | 39,578
|Add: Dividends paid on Treasury Method restricted stock                                  |  |      | 3      |      | 55    
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income for common unit holders  diluted                                             |  | $    | 37,013 |      | 39,633
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Denominator:                                                                             |  |      |        |      |       
|Weighted average common units outstanding for basic EPU                                  |  |      | 69,688 |      | 69,063
|Incremental units to be issued under common stock options using the Treasury method      |  |      | 185    |      | 326   
|Incremental units to be issued under unvested restricted stock using the Treasury method |  |      | 4      |      | 92    
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Weighted average common units outstanding for diluted EPU                                |  |      | 69,877 |      | 69,481
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Income per common unit  basic                                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 0.48   |      | 0.55  
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 0.05   |      | 0.02  
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                              |  | $    | 0.53   |      | 0.57  
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Income per common unit  diluted                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 0.48   |      | 0.55  
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 0.05   |      | 0.02  
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                              |  | $    | 0.53   |      | 0.57  
|                                                                                         |  |      |        |      |       



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007

|11. | Earnings per Unit (continued)
|--- | -----------------------------



The following summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively (in thousands except per unit data):



|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | -------
|                                                                                         |  | 2007 |         | 2006
|Numerator:                                                                               |  |      |         |      |        
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 128,794 |      | 118,539
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 23,441  |      | 38,552 
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income                                                                               |  |      | 152,235 |      | 157,091
|Less: Preferred unit distributions                                                       |  |      | 17,550  |      | 17,550 
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income for common unit holders                                                       |  |      | 134,685 |      | 139,541
|Less: Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock                                        |  |      | 782     |      | 922    
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income for common units holders - basic                                              |  |      | 133,903 |      | 138,619
|Add: Dividends paid on Treasury Method restricted stock                                  |  |      | 86      |      | 152    
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income for common unit holders  diluted                                             |  | $    | 133,989 |      | 138,771
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Denominator:                                                                             |  |      |         |      |        
|Weighted average common units outstanding for basic EPU                                  |  |      | 69,507  |      | 68,875 
|Incremental units to be issued under common stock options using the Treasury method      |  |      | 239     |      | 309    
|Incremental units to be issued under unvested restricted stock using the Treasury method |  |      | 43      |      | 85     
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Weighted average common units outstanding for diluted EPU                                |  |      | 69,789  |      | 69,269 
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Income per common unit  basic                                                           |  |      |         |      |        
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 1.59    |      | 1.45   
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 0.34    |      | 0.56   
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                              |  | $    | 1.93    |      | 2.01   
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Income per common unit  diluted                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Income from continuing operations                                                        |  | $    | 1.58    |      | 1.44   
|Discontinued operations                                                                  |  |      | 0.34    |      | 0.56   
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        
|Net income for common unit holders per unit                                              |  | $    | 1.92    |      | 2.00   
|                                                                                         |  |      |         |      |        



32



---

##### Table of Contents

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007



|12. | Commitments and Contingencies
|--- | -----------------------------

The Partnership is involved
in litigation on a number of matters and is subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. The Partnership is also subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations as they apply to real estate pertaining to chemicals used by the dry cleaning industry, the existence of asbestos
in older shopping centers, and underground petroleum storage tanks (USTs). The Partnership believes that the tenants who currently operate dry cleaning plants or gas stations do so in accordance with current laws and regulations. The
Partnership has placed environmental insurance, when possible, on specific properties with known contamination, in order to mitigate its environmental risk. The Partnership monitors the shopping centers containing environmental issues and in certain
cases voluntarily remediates the sites. The Partnership also has legal obligations to remediate certain sites and is in the process of doing so. The Partnership estimates the cost associated with these legal obligations to be approximately $4.0
million, all of which has been accrued. The Partnership believes that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not have a material effect on its financial position, liquidity, or operations; however, it can give no
assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to the shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to
it; that the current environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by unrelated third parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and
regulations or their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to the Partnership.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, the following information contains
forward-looking statements as defined under federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include statements about anticipated growth in revenues, the size of our development program, earnings per unit, returns and portfolio value and
expectations about our liquidity. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which Regency Centers Corporation (Regency or Company) and Regency Centers, L.
P. (RCLP or the Partnership) operates, and managements beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, changes in national and local economic conditions; financial difficulties of tenants;
competitive market conditions, including pricing of acquisitions and sales of properties and out-parcels; changes in expected leasing activity and market rents; timing of acquisitions, development starts and sales of properties and out-parcels;
meeting development schedules; our inability to exercise voting control over the joint ventures through which we own or develop many of our properties; weather; consequences of any armed conflict or terrorist attack against the United States; and
the ability to obtain governmental approvals. For additional information, see Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of Regency Centers, L.P. appearing elsewhere within.

Overview and Operating Philosophy

Regency is a qualified real estate investment trust (REIT), which began operations in 1993. Our primary operating and
investment goal is long-term growth in earnings per share and total shareholder return, which we work to achieve by focusing on a strategy of owning, operating and developing high-quality community and neighborhood shopping centers that are tenanted
by market-dominant grocers, category-leading anchors, specialty retailers and restaurants located in areas with above average household incomes and population densities. All of our operating, investing and financing activities are performed through
our operating partnership, Regency Centers, L.P. (RCLP), RCLPs wholly owned subsidiaries, and through its investments in joint ventures with third parties. Regency currently owns 99% of the outstanding operating partnership units
of RCLP.

At September 30, 2007, we directly owned 228 shopping centers (the Consolidated Properties) located in 23 states
representing 25.5 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). Our cost of these shopping centers is $3.9 billion before depreciation. Through joint ventures, we own partial interests in 219 shopping centers (the
Unconsolidated Properties) located in 27 states and the District of Columbia representing 25.6 million square feet of GLA. Our investment in the partnerships that own the Unconsolidated Properties is $446.7 million. Certain
portfolio information described below is presented (a) on a Combined Basis, which is a total of the Consolidated Properties and the Unconsolidated Properties, (b) for our Consolidated Properties only and (c) for the Unconsolidated
Properties that we own through joint ventures. We believe that presenting the information under these methods provides a more complete understanding of the properties that we wholly-own versus those that we partially-own, but for which we provide
full property management, asset management, investing and financing services. The shopping center portfolio that we manage, on a Combined Basis, represents 447 shopping centers located in 29 states and the District of Columbia and contains
51.0 million square feet of GLA.

We earn revenues and generate cash flow by leasing space in our shopping centers to market-leading
grocers, major retail anchors, specialty side-shop retailers, and restaurants, including ground leasing or selling building pads (out-parcels) to these potential tenants. We experience growth in revenues by increasing occupancy and rental rates at
currently owned shopping centers, and by acquiring and developing new shopping centers. Community and neighborhood shopping centers generate substantial daily traffic by conveniently offering daily necessities and services. This high traffic
generates increased sales, thereby driving higher occupancy and rental-rate growth, which we expect will sustain our growth in earnings per unit and increase the value of our portfolio over the long term.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

We seek a range of strong national, regional and local specialty retailers, for the same reason that we
choose to anchor our centers with leading grocers and major retailers who provide a mix of goods and services that meet consumer needs. We have created a formal partnering process  the Premier Customer Initiative (PCI)  to
promote mutually beneficial relationships with our specialty retailers. The objective of PCI is for RCLP to build a base of specialty tenants who represent the best-in-class operators in their respective merchandising categories. Such
retailers reinforce the consumer appeal and other strengths of a centers anchor, help to stabilize a centers occupancy, reduce re-leasing downtime, reduce tenant turnover and yield higher sustainable rents.

We grow our shopping center portfolio through acquisitions of operating centers and new shopping center development, where we acquire the land and
construct the building. Development is customer driven, meaning we generally have an executed lease from the anchor before we start construction. Developments serve the growth needs of our anchors and specialty retailers, resulting in modern
shopping centers with long-term anchor leases that produce attractive returns on our invested capital. This development process can require up to 36 months, or longer, from initial land or redevelopment acquisition through construction, lease-up and
stabilization of rental income, depending upon the size of the project. Generally, anchor tenants begin operating their stores prior to the completion of construction of the entire center, resulting in rental income during the development phase.

We intend to maintain a conservative capital structure to fund our growth program, which should preserve our investment-grade ratings. Our
approach is founded on our self-funding business model. This model utilizes center recycling as a key component, which requires ongoing monitoring of each center to ensure that it continues to meet our investment standards. We sell the
operating properties that no longer measure up to our standards. We also develop certain retail centers because of their attractive profit margins with the intent of selling them to joint ventures or other third parties upon completion. These sale
proceeds are re-deployed into new, higher-quality developments and acquisitions that are expected to generate sustainable revenue growth and more attractive returns.

Joint venturing of shopping centers also provides us with a capital source for new developments and acquisitions, as well as the opportunity to earn fees for asset and property management services. As asset manager,
we are engaged by our partners to apply similar operating, investment, and capital strategies to the portfolios owned by the joint ventures. Joint ventures grow their shopping center investments through acquisitions from third parties or direct
purchases from RCLP. Although selling properties to joint ventures reduces our ownership interest, we continue to share in the risks and rewards of centers that meet our high quality standards and long-term investment strategy. We have no
obligations or liabilities of the joint ventures beyond our ownership interest percentage.

We have identified certain significant risks
and challenges affecting our industry, and we are addressing them accordingly. An economic downturn could result in a decline in occupancy levels at our shopping centers, which would reduce our rental revenues; however, we believe that our
investment focus on neighborhood and community shopping centers that conveniently provide daily necessities will minimize the impact of a downturn in the economy. Increased competition and industry consolidation could result in retailer store
closings; however, we closely monitor the operating performance and tenants sales in our shopping centers including those tenants operating retail formats that are experiencing significant changes in competition or business practice. We also
continue to monitor retail trends and market our shopping centers based on consumer demand. A significant slowdown in retailer demand for new stores could cause a corresponding reduction in our shopping center development program that would likely
reduce our future rental revenues and profits from development sales; as well as, increase our operating expenses as a result of reducing our capitalized employee costs (See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates  Capitalization of Costs
described further below). However, based upon our current pipeline of development projects undergoing due diligence, which is our best indication of retailer expansion plans, the presence of our development teams in key markets in combination with
their excellent relationships with leading anchor tenants, we anticipate that we will be able to sustain our development program at historical levels of investment for the next three years.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Shopping Center Portfolio

The following tables summarize general operating statistics related to our shopping center portfolio, which we use to evaluate and monitor our performance. The portfolio information below is presented (a) on a
Combined Basis, (b) for Consolidated Properties and (c) for Unconsolidated Properties, the definitions of which are provided above:



|                              |  |                    |   |  |                   |  
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------ | - |  | ----------------- | -
|                              |  | September 30, 2007 |   |  | December 31, 2006 |  
|Number of Properties (a)      |  | 447                |   |  | 405               |  
|Number of Properties (b)      |  | 228                |   |  | 218               |  
|Number of Properties (c)      |  | 219                |   |  | 187               |  
|                              |  |                   
|Properties in Development (a) |  | 45                 |   |  | 47                |  
|Properties in Development (b) |  | 44                 |   |  | 43                |  
|Properties in Development (c) |  | 1                  |   |  | 4                 |  
|                              |  |                   
|Gross Leasable Area (a)       |  | 51,046,666         |   |  | 47,187,462        |  
|Gross Leasable Area (b)       |  | 25,492,107         |   |  | 24,654,082        |  
|Gross Leasable Area (c)       |  | 25,554,559         |   |  | 22,533,380        |  
|                              |  |                   
|Percent Leased (a)            |  | 91.8               | % |  | 91.0              | %
|Percent Leased (b)            |  | 88.1               | % |  | 87.3              | %
|Percent Leased (c)            |  | 95.5               | % |  | 95.0              | %

We seek to reduce our operating and leasing risks through diversification which we achieve by
geographically diversifying our shopping centers; avoiding dependence on any single property, market, or tenant, and owning a portion of our shopping centers through joint ventures.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest
holdings presented on a Combined Basis:



|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|----------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------- | ----------------- | ------------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ----------- |  | ---------- |  | ------------- | - |  | ------- | -
|                  |  | September 30, 2007 |  |            | December 31, 2006 |              
|Location          |  | #Properties        |  | GLA        |                   | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |   |  | #Properties |  | GLA        |  | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |  
|California        |  | 71                 |  | 9,394,868  |                   | 18.4          | % |  | 90.2    | % |  | 71          |  | 9,521,497  |  | 20.2          | % |  | 88.6    | %
|Florida           |  | 59                 |  | 6,260,763  |                   | 12.3          | % |  | 94.5    | % |  | 55          |  | 6,175,929  |  | 13.1          | % |  | 93.1    | %
|Texas             |  | 37                 |  | 4,437,523  |                   | 8.7           | % |  | 88.7    | % |  | 39          |  | 4,779,440  |  | 10.1          | % |  | 86.1    | %
|Virginia          |  | 34                 |  | 4,151,800  |                   | 8.1           | % |  | 93.4    | % |  | 33          |  | 3,884,864  |  | 8.2           | % |  | 94.1    | %
|Illinois          |  | 24                 |  | 2,901,849  |                   | 5.7           | % |  | 96.1    | % |  | 16          |  | 2,256,682  |  | 4.8           | % |  | 95.8    | %
|Georgia           |  | 32                 |  | 2,736,759  |                   | 5.4           | % |  | 92.3    | % |  | 32          |  | 2,735,441  |  | 5.8           | % |  | 92.6    | %
|Colorado          |  | 21                 |  | 2,333,513  |                   | 4.6           | % |  | 92.8    | % |  | 21          |  | 2,345,224  |  | 5.0           | % |  | 91.8    | %
|Ohio              |  | 16                 |  | 2,270,917  |                   | 4.5           | % |  | 86.7    | % |  | 16          |  | 2,292,515  |  | 4.9           | % |  | 85.3    | %
|Missouri          |  | 23                 |  | 2,262,346  |                   | 4.5           | % |  | 98.1    | % |  |            |  |           |  |              |   |  |        |  
|North Carolina    |  | 15                 |  | 2,122,823  |                   | 4.2           | % |  | 92.9    | % |  | 16          |  | 2,193,420  |  | 4.6           | % |  | 92.4    | %
|Maryland          |  | 18                 |  | 2,058,337  |                   | 4.0           | % |  | 95.6    | % |  | 18          |  | 2,058,329  |  | 4.4           | % |  | 94.6    | %
|Pennsylvania      |  | 13                 |  | 1,648,536  |                   | 3.2           | % |  | 93.6    | % |  | 13          |  | 1,649,570  |  | 3.5           | % |  | 90.1    | %
|Washington        |  | 13                 |  | 1,332,544  |                   | 2.6           | % |  | 98.4    | % |  | 11          |  | 1,172,684  |  | 2.5           | % |  | 94.5    | %
|Oregon            |  | 11                 |  | 1,089,386  |                   | 2.1           | % |  | 95.4    | % |  | 10          |  | 1,011,678  |  | 2.1           | % |  | 91.5    | %
|Nevada            |  | 3                  |  | 783,535    |                   | 1.5           | % |  | 39.7    | % |  | 1           |  | 119,313    |  | 0.3           | % |  | 87.4    | %
|Delaware          |  | 5                  |  | 654,779    |                   | 1.3           | % |  | 90.6    | % |  | 5           |  | 654,687    |  | 1.4           | % |  | 91.3    | %
|South Carolina    |  | 10                 |  | 616,148    |                   | 1.2           | % |  | 92.4    | % |  | 9           |  | 536,847    |  | 1.1           | % |  | 97.5    | %
|Tennessee         |  | 8                  |  | 576,614    |                   | 1.1           | % |  | 95.7    | % |  | 7           |  | 488,050    |  | 1.0           | % |  | 94.4    | %
|Massachusetts     |  | 3                  |  | 567,265    |                   | 1.1           | % |  | 85.8    | % |  | 3           |  | 568,099    |  | 1.2           | % |  | 83.7    | %
|Arizona           |  | 4                  |  | 496,073    |                   | 1.0           | % |  | 98.7    | % |  | 4           |  | 496,087    |  | 1.1           | % |  | 99.3    | %
|Minnesota         |  | 3                  |  | 483,938    |                   | 0.9           | % |  | 96.3    | % |  | 3           |  | 483,938    |  | 1.0           | % |  | 96.5    | %
|Kentucky          |  | 3                  |  | 325,792    |                   | 0.6           | % |  | 88.1    | % |  | 2           |  | 302,670    |  | 0.6           | % |  | 95.0    | %
|Michigan          |  | 4                  |  | 303,457    |                   | 0.6           | % |  | 90.4    | % |  | 4           |  | 303,412    |  | 0.6           | % |  | 87.6    | %
|Indiana           |  | 6                  |  | 273,254    |                   | 0.5           | % |  | 81.9    | % |  | 5           |  | 193,370    |  | 0.4           | % |  | 70.9    | %
|Wisconsin         |  | 2                  |  | 269,128    |                   | 0.5           | % |  | 97.7    | % |  | 2           |  | 269,128    |  | 0.6           | % |  | 97.3    | %
|Alabama           |  | 2                  |  | 193,558    |                   | 0.4           | % |  | 83.5    | % |  | 2           |  | 193,558    |  | 0.4           | % |  | 82.2    | %
|Connecticut       |  | 1                  |  | 179,860    |                   | 0.4           | % |  | 100.0   | % |  | 1           |  | 179,730    |  | 0.4           | % |  | 100.0   | %
|New Jersey        |  | 2                  |  | 156,482    |                   | 0.3           | % |  | 97.8    | % |  | 2           |  | 156,482    |  | 0.3           | % |  | 97.8    | %
|New Hampshire     |  | 2                  |  | 125,173    |                   | 0.2           | % |  | 80.6    | % |  | 2           |  | 125,173    |  | 0.3           | % |  | 74.8    | %
|Dist. of Columbia |  | 2                  |  | 39,646     |                   | 0.1           | % |  | 79.4    | % |  | 2           |  | 39,645     |  | 0.1           | % |  | 89.4    | %
|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|Total             |  | 447                |  | 51,046,666 |                   | 100.0         | % |  | 91.8    | % |  | 405         |  | 47,187,462 |  | 100.0         | % |  | 91.0    | %
|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  



37



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest holdings presented for
the Consolidated Properties:



|               |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|-------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------- | ----------------- | ------------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ----------- |  | ---------- |  | ------------- | - |  | ------- | -
|               |  | September 30, 2007 |  |            | December 31, 2006 |              
|Location       |  | #Properties        |  | GLA        |                   | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |   |  | #Properties |  | GLA        |  | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |  
|California     |  | 44                 |  | 5,553,646  |                   | 21.8          | % |  | 87.1    | % |  | 46          |  | 5,861,515  |  | 23.8          | % |  | 84.9    | %
|Florida        |  | 40                 |  | 4,193,302  |                   | 16.4          | % |  | 94.8    | % |  | 34          |  | 4,054,604  |  | 16.4          | % |  | 93.6    | %
|Texas          |  | 29                 |  | 3,405,273  |                   | 13.4          | % |  | 86.3    | % |  | 30          |  | 3,629,118  |  | 14.7          | % |  | 82.5    | %
|Ohio           |  | 14                 |  | 2,015,736  |                   | 7.9           | % |  | 85.2    | % |  | 14          |  | 2,037,134  |  | 8.3           | % |  | 83.6    | %
|Virginia       |  | 11                 |  | 1,416,821  |                   | 5.6           | % |  | 88.2    | % |  | 9           |  | 1,018,531  |  | 4.1           | % |  | 89.1    | %
|Georgia        |  | 16                 |  | 1,409,725  |                   | 5.5           | % |  | 90.2    | % |  | 16          |  | 1,408,407  |  | 5.7           | % |  | 89.7    | %
|Colorado       |  | 13                 |  | 1,158,491  |                   | 4.6           | % |  | 90.5    | % |  | 13          |  | 1,158,670  |  | 4.7           | % |  | 89.0    | %
|North Carolina |  | 9                  |  | 947,413    |                   | 3.7           | % |  | 94.9    | % |  | 9           |  | 947,413    |  | 3.8           | % |  | 95.3    | %
|Oregon         |  | 8                  |  | 734,716    |                   | 2.9           | % |  | 95.2    | % |  | 7           |  | 657,008    |  | 2.7           | % |  | 88.8    | %
|Nevada         |  | 2                  |  | 684,471    |                   | 2.7           | % |  | 31.2    | % |  | 1           |  | 119,313    |  | 0.5           | % |  | 87.4    | %
|Washington     |  | 7                  |  | 663,577    |                   | 2.6           | % |  | 98.7    | % |  | 6           |  | 555,666    |  | 2.3           | % |  | 90.3    | %
|Pennsylvania   |  | 4                  |  | 586,308    |                   | 2.3           | % |  | 92.8    | % |  | 4           |  | 587,592    |  | 2.4           | % |  | 78.1    | %
|Tennessee      |  | 7                  |  | 490,549    |                   | 1.9           | % |  | 95.1    | % |  | 7           |  | 488,050    |  | 2.0           | % |  | 94.4    | %
|Illinois       |  | 3                  |  | 414,996    |                   | 1.6           | % |  | 93.4    | % |  | 3           |  | 415,011    |  | 1.7           | % |  | 93.6    | %
|Arizona        |  | 3                  |  | 388,440    |                   | 1.5           | % |  | 98.9    | % |  | 3           |  | 388,440    |  | 1.6           | % |  | 99.1    | %
|Massachusetts  |  | 2                  |  | 381,986    |                   | 1.5           | % |  | 79.2    | % |  | 2           |  | 382,820    |  | 1.5           | % |  | 76.1    | %
|Michigan       |  | 4                  |  | 303,457    |                   | 1.2           | % |  | 90.4    | % |  | 4           |  | 303,412    |  | 1.2           | % |  | 87.6    | %
|Delaware       |  | 2                  |  | 240,418    |                   | 0.9           | % |  | 98.7    | % |  | 2           |  | 240,418    |  | 1.0           | % |  | 98.7    | %
|South Carolina |  | 3                  |  | 170,662    |                   | 0.7           | % |  | 78.3    | % |  | 2           |  | 91,361     |  | 0.4           | % |  | 94.7    | %
|Maryland       |  | 1                  |  | 129,340    |                   | 0.5           | % |  | 77.3    | % |  | 1           |  | 129,940    |  | 0.5           | % |  | 67.0    | %
|New Hampshire  |  | 2                  |  | 125,173    |                   | 0.5           | % |  | 80.6    | % |  | 2           |  | 125,173    |  | 0.5           | % |  | 74.8    | %
|Indiana        |  | 3                  |  | 54,485     |                   | 0.2           | % |  | 39.3    | % |  | 3           |  | 54,486     |  | 0.2           | % |  | 23.5    | %
|Kentucky       |  | 1                  |  | 23,122     |                   | 0.1           | % |  | 0.0     | % |  |            |  |           |  |              |   |  |        |  
|               |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|Total          |  | 228                |  | 25,492,107 |                   | 100.0         | % |  | 88.1    | % |  | 218         |  | 24,654,082 |  | 100.0         | % |  | 87.3    | %
|               |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  

The Consolidated Properties are encumbered by mortgage loans of $244.9 million.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest holdings presented for
the Unconsolidated Properties owned in joint ventures:



|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|----------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------- | ----------------- | ------------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ----------- |  | ---------- |  | ------------- | - |  | ------- | -
|                  |  | September 30, 2007 |  |            | December 31, 2006 |              
|Location          |  | #Properties        |  | GLA        |                   | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |   |  | #Properties |  | GLA        |  | % of TotalGLA |   |  | %Leased |  
|California        |  | 27                 |  | 3,841,222  |                   | 15.0          | % |  | 94.8    | % |  | 25          |  | 3,659,982  |  | 16.2          | % |  | 94.5    | %
|Virginia          |  | 23                 |  | 2,734,979  |                   | 10.7          | % |  | 96.0    | % |  | 24          |  | 2,866,333  |  | 12.7          | % |  | 95.8    | %
|Illinois          |  | 21                 |  | 2,486,853  |                   | 9.7           | % |  | 96.6    | % |  | 13          |  | 1,841,671  |  | 8.2           | % |  | 96.3    | %
|Missouri          |  | 23                 |  | 2,262,346  |                   | 8.9           | % |  | 98.1    | % |  |            |  |           |  |              |   |  |        |  
|Florida           |  | 19                 |  | 2,067,461  |                   | 8.1           | % |  | 94.1    | % |  | 21          |  | 2,121,325  |  | 9.4           | % |  | 92.1    | %
|Maryland          |  | 17                 |  | 1,928,997  |                   | 7.5           | % |  | 96.8    | % |  | 17          |  | 1,928,389  |  | 8.6           | % |  | 96.4    | %
|Georgia           |  | 16                 |  | 1,327,034  |                   | 5.2           | % |  | 94.6    | % |  | 16          |  | 1,327,034  |  | 5.9           | % |  | 95.7    | %
|North Carolina    |  | 6                  |  | 1,175,410  |                   | 4.6           | % |  | 91.3    | % |  | 7           |  | 1,246,007  |  | 5.5           | % |  | 90.1    | %
|Colorado          |  | 8                  |  | 1,175,022  |                   | 4.6           | % |  | 95.1    | % |  | 8           |  | 1,186,554  |  | 5.3           | % |  | 94.5    | %
|Pennsylvania      |  | 9                  |  | 1,062,228  |                   | 4.2           | % |  | 94.1    | % |  | 9           |  | 1,061,978  |  | 4.7           | % |  | 96.8    | %
|Texas             |  | 8                  |  | 1,032,250  |                   | 4.0           | % |  | 96.6    | % |  | 9           |  | 1,150,322  |  | 5.1           | % |  | 97.4    | %
|Washington        |  | 6                  |  | 668,967    |                   | 2.6           | % |  | 98.1    | % |  | 5           |  | 617,018    |  | 2.7           | % |  | 98.3    | %
|Minnesota         |  | 3                  |  | 483,938    |                   | 1.9           | % |  | 96.3    | % |  | 3           |  | 483,938    |  | 2.2           | % |  | 96.5    | %
|South Carolina    |  | 7                  |  | 445,486    |                   | 1.7           | % |  | 97.9    | % |  | 7           |  | 445,486    |  | 2.0           | % |  | 98.0    | %
|Delaware          |  | 3                  |  | 414,361    |                   | 1.6           | % |  | 85.9    | % |  | 3           |  | 414,269    |  | 1.8           | % |  | 87.0    | %
|Oregon            |  | 3                  |  | 354,670    |                   | 1.4           | % |  | 95.9    | % |  | 3           |  | 354,670    |  | 1.6           | % |  | 96.5    | %
|Kentucky          |  | 2                  |  | 302,670    |                   | 1.2           | % |  | 94.8    | % |  | 2           |  | 302,670    |  | 1.3           | % |  | 95.0    | %
|Wisconsin         |  | 2                  |  | 269,128    |                   | 1.1           | % |  | 97.7    | % |  | 2           |  | 269,128    |  | 1.2           | % |  | 97.3    | %
|Ohio              |  | 2                  |  | 255,181    |                   | 1.0           | % |  | 98.5    | % |  | 2           |  | 255,381    |  | 1.1           | % |  | 99.0    | %
|Indiana           |  | 3                  |  | 218,769    |                   | 0.9           | % |  | 92.6    | % |  | 2           |  | 138,884    |  | 0.6           | % |  | 89.5    | %
|Alabama           |  | 2                  |  | 193,558    |                   | 0.8           | % |  | 83.5    | % |  | 2           |  | 193,558    |  | 0.9           | % |  | 82.2    | %
|Massachusetts     |  | 1                  |  | 185,279    |                   | 0.7           | % |  | 99.4    | % |  | 1           |  | 185,279    |  | 0.8           | % |  | 99.4    | %
|Connecticut       |  | 1                  |  | 179,860    |                   | 0.7           | % |  | 100.0   | % |  | 1           |  | 179,730    |  | 0.8           | % |  | 100.0   | %
|New Jersey        |  | 2                  |  | 156,482    |                   | 0.6           | % |  | 97.8    | % |  | 2           |  | 156,482    |  | 0.7           | % |  | 97.8    | %
|Arizona           |  | 1                  |  | 107,633    |                   | 0.4           | % |  | 98.1    | % |  | 1           |  | 107,647    |  | 0.5           | % |  | 100.0   | %
|Nevada            |  | 1                  |  | 99,064     |                   | 0.4           | % |  | 98.9    | % |  |            |  |           |  |              |   |  |        |  
|Tennessee         |  | 1                  |  | 86,065     |                   | 0.3           | % |  | 98.8    | % |  |            |  |           |  |              |   |  |        |  
|Dist. of Columbia |  | 2                  |  | 39,646     |                   | 0.2           | % |  | 79.4    | % |  | 2           |  | 39,645     |  | 0.2           | % |  | 89.4    | %
|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  
|Total             |  | 219                |  | 25,554,559 |                   | 100.0         | % |  | 95.5    | % |  | 187         |  | 22,533,380 |  | 100.0         | % |  | 95.0    | %
|                  |  |                    |  |            |                   |               |   |  |         |   |  |             |  |            |  |               |   |  |         |  

The Unconsolidated Properties are encumbered by mortgage loans of $2.6 billion.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

The following summarizes the four largest grocery tenants occupying our shopping centers at
September 30, 2007:



|               |  |                     |  |                                        |   |  |                                       |  
|-------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------- | -
|Grocery Anchor |  | Number ofStores (a) |  | Percentage ofPartnership-owned GLA (b) |   |  | Percentage ofAnnualized Base Rent (b) |  
|Kroger         |  | 68                  |  | 8.9                                    | % |  | 5.9                                   | %
|Publix         |  | 71                  |  | 6.7                                    | % |  | 4.3                                   | %
|Safeway        |  | 66                  |  | 5.3                                    | % |  | 3.6                                   | %
|Super Valu     |  | 35                  |  | 3.4                                    | % |  | 2.7                                   | %

---

|(a) | For the Combined Properties including stores owned by grocery anchors that are attached to our centers.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | GLA and annualized base rent include the Consolidated Properties plus RCLPs pro-rata share of the Unconsolidated Properties.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although base rent is supported by long-term lease contracts, tenants who file bankruptcy are given the choice to cancel any or all of their leases and
close related stores, or to continue to operate. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers files bankruptcy and cancels its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues. We
continually monitor industry trends and sales data to help us identify declines in retail categories or tenants who might be experiencing financial difficulties especially in light of the current decline in the housing market and reductions in
credit availability for consumers. We continue to monitor the video rental industry while its operators transition to different rental formats including on-line rental programs. At September 30, 2007, we had leases with 131 video rental stores
representing $9.5 million of annual rental income to the Consolidated Properties and our pro-rata share of the Unconsolidated Properties.

In October 2007, Movie Gallery filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Movie Gallery has closed four stores and has served notice of two additional store closings. The annual base rent on a pro rata basis associated with these six
stores is approximately $326,000 or .07% of annual base rental revenues on a pro rata basis. Subsequent to these closings, we expect that Movie Gallery will continue to operate 27 stores with annual base rent of approximately $1.9 million or .42% of
annual base rental revenues on a pro-rata basis.

We are not aware at this time of the current or pending bankruptcy of any other tenants
that would cause a significant reduction in our revenues, and no tenant represents more than 6% of the total of our annual base rental revenues and our pro-rata share of the base revenues of the Unconsolidated Properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We expect that cash
generated from operating activities combined with gains on the sale of development properties will provide the necessary funds to pay our operating expenses, interest expense, scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, capital
expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our shopping centers, and dividends to unit holders. Net cash provided by operating activities was $176.6 million and $163.2 million, and gains from the sale of real estate were $56.6 million and $74.7
million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we incurred capital expenditures to improve our shopping centers of $10.2 million and $8.3 million, we
paid scheduled principal payments of $3.3 million and $3.3 million to our lenders on mortgage loans, and we paid distributions to our unit holders of $147.5 million and $132.9 million, respectively. In 2007, Regency increased its annual dividends
rate by 10.9%.

We intend to continue to grow our portfolio by investing in shopping centers through ground up development of new centers
or acquisition of existing centers. Because development and acquisition activities are discretionary in nature, they are not expected to burden the capital resources we have



40



---

##### Table of Contents

currently available for liquidity requirements. We expect to meet our long-term capital investment requirements for development and acquisitions, as well as,
the redemption of preferred stock at our election and the repayment of maturing debt from: (i) residual cash generated from operating activities after the payments described above, (ii) proceeds from the sale of real estate,
(iii) joint venturing of real estate, (iv) refinancing of debt, and (v) equity raised in the capital markets.

The following
table summarizes net cash flows related to operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):



|                                                    |  |                                  |          |   |      |          |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -------- | - | ---- | -------- | -
|                                                    |  | Nine months ending September 30, |         
|                                                    |  | 2007                             |          |   | 2006 |         
|Net cash provided by operating activities           |  | $                                | 176,622  |   |      | 163,198  |  
|Net cash used in investing activities               |  |                                  | (356,764 | ) |      | (6,270   | )
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |                                  | 179,667  |   |      | (161,026 | )
|                                                    |  |                                  |          |   |      |          |  
|Net decrease in cash and equivalents                |  | $                                | (475     | ) |      | (4,098   | )
|                                                    |  |                                  |          |   |      |          |  

At September 30, 2007, we had an unlimited amount under our shelf registration for equity
securities based on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and RCLP had $200 million available for debt under its shelf registration. We believe that our ability to access the capital markets as a source of funds to meet
capital requirements is good.

At September 30, 2007 we had 45 properties under construction or undergoing major renovations on a
Combined Basis, which when completed, will represent a net investment of $1.0 billion after projected sales of adjacent land and out-parcels. This compares to 47 properties that were under construction at the end of 2006 representing an investment
of $1.1 billion upon completion. We estimate that we will earn an average return on our investment on our current development projects in a range of 8.25% to 8.75% on a fully allocated basis including direct internal costs and the cost to acquire
any residual interests held by minority development partners. Average returns have declined over previous years primarily the result of higher costs associated with the acquisition of land and construction. We believe that our development returns
are sufficient on a risk adjusted basis. Costs necessary to complete the current development projects, net of projected land sales are estimated to be $458.8 million and will likely be expended through 2010. The costs to complete these developments
will be funded from our $600 million line of credit, which had $490 million of available funding at September 30, 2007, and from expected proceeds from the future sale of shopping centers as part of the capital recycling program described
above.

During 2007, we acquired five shopping centers for a purchase price of $106.0 million, which included the assumption of $42.3
million in debt, net of a $1.2 million discount. In accordance with Statement 141, acquired lease intangible assets and acquired lease intangible liabilities of $9.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively were recorded for these acquisitions. The
acquisitions were accounted for as a purchase business combination and the results of their operations are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships (Joint Ventures)

At September 30, 2007,
we had investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships of $446.7 million. The following is a summary of unconsolidated combined assets and liabilities of these joint ventures and our pro-rata share (see note below) at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):



41



---

##### Table of Contents

|                         |  |            |  |           
|------------------------ |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                         |  | 2007       |  | 2006      
|Number of Joint Ventures |  | 19         |  | 18        
|RCLPs Ownership         |  | 16%-50%    |  | 20%-50%   
|Number of Properties     |  | 219        |  | 187       
|                         |  |           
|Combined Assets          |  | $4,759,228 |  | $4,365,675
|Combined Liabilities     |  | 2,847,674  |  | 2,574,860 
|Combined Equity          |  | 1,911,554  |  | 1,790,815 
|                         |  |           
|RCLPs Share of (1):     |  |            |  |           
|Assets                   |  | $1,161,051 |  | $1,106,803
|Liabilities              |  | 689,390    |  | 646,346   

---

|(1) | Pro rata financial information is not, and is not intended to be, a presentation
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, management believes that providing such information is useful to investors in assessing the impact of its unconsolidated real estate partnership activities on the operations
of RCLP, which includes such items on a single line presentation under the equity method in its consolidated financial statements.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We account for all investments in real estate partnerships in which we own 50% or less and do not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. We have determined that these investments are not
variable interest entities as defined in FIN 46(R) and do not require consolidation under EITF 04-5 or SOP 78-9, and therefore are subject to the voting interest model in determining our basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property
acquisitions not meeting pre-established investment criteria, dispositions, financings, annual budgets and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval of all partners. Investments in real estate partnerships are primarily composed of
joint ventures where we invest with three co-investment partners and a recently formed open-end real estate fund (Regency Retail Partners or the Fund), as further described below. In addition to earning our pro-rata share of
net income or loss in each of these partnerships, we receive fees for asset management, property management, leasing, investment and financing services. During the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we received fees from these
joint ventures of $10.7 million and $5.2 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we received fees from these joint ventures of $24.4 million and $24.2 million, respectively. Our investments in real
estate partnerships as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consist of the following (in thousands):



|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------- | - |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | -------
|                                                 |  | Ownership |   |  | 2007 |         | 2006
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR I)           |  | 25.00     | % |  | $    | 53,879  |      | 60,651 
|Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR I)            |  | 25.00     | % |  |      | 6,194   |      | 6,822  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)       |  | 24.95     | % |  |      | 220,406 |      | 234,378
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency III (MCWR II)      |  | 24.95     | % |  |      | 831     |      | 1,140  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency-DESCO (MCWR-DESCO) |  | 16.35     | % |  |      | 29,572  |      |       
|Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)      |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 35,762  |      | 36,096 
|Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)                   |  | 30.00     | % |  |      | 20,419  |      | 20,826 
|Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)          |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 12,447  |      | 11,516 
|RegCal, LLC (RegCal)                             |  | 25.00     | % |  |      | 17,284  |      | 18,514 
|Regency Retail Partners (the Fund) (1)           |  | 20.00     | % |  |      | 10,541  |      | 5,139  
|Other investments in real estate partnerships    |  | 50.00     | % |  |      | 39,318  |      | 39,008 
|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        
|Total                                            |  |           |   |  | $    | 446,653 |      | 434,090
|                                                 |  |           |   |  |      |         |      |        

---

|(1) | At December 31, 2006, our ownership interest in Regency Retail Partners was
26.8%.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



42



---

##### Table of Contents

We co-invest with the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund in three joint ventures (collectively
Columbia), in which we have ownership interests of 20% or 30%. As of September 30, 2007, Columbia owned 21 shopping centers, had total assets of $570.8 million, and net income of $9.7 million for the nine months ended. Our share of
Columbias total assets and net income was $126.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively which represents 3.1% of our total assets and 1.5% of our net income available for common unit holders. During 2007, Columbia acquired one shopping center
from an unrelated party for a purchase price of $12.0 million, net of $8.1 million of assumed debt and we contributed $2.4 million for our pro-rata share of the purchase price.

We co-invest with the California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) in a joint venture (RegCal) in which we have a
25% ownership interest. As of September 30, 2007, RegCal owned eight shopping centers, had total assets of $167.7 million, and had net income of $2.4 million for the nine months ended. Our share of RegCals total assets and net income was
$41.9 million and $547,808, respectively which represents 1.0% of our total assets and less than 1% of our net income available for common unit holders, respectively. During 2007, CalSTRS sold one shopping center to an unrelated party for $13.2
million for a gain of $1.4 million.

We co-invest with Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia (MCW) in five joint ventures,
two in which we have an ownership interest of 25% (MCWR I), two in which we have an ownership interest of 24.95% (MCWR II), and one in which we have an ownership interest of 16.35% (MCWR-DESCO).

As of September 30, 2007, MCWR I owned 50 shopping centers, had total assets of $702.3 million, and net income of $15.6 million for the nine months
ended. Our share of MCWR Is total assets and net income was $175.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively. During 2007, MCWR I sold one shopping center for $33.4 million to an unrelated party for a gain of $7.9 million, and acquired one
shopping center from an unrelated party for a purchase price of $23.0 million which included the assumption of $10.8 million of debt and we contributed $5.8 million for our pro-rata share of the purchase price.

As of September 30, 2007, MCWR II owned 96 shopping centers, had total assets of $2.6 billion and a net loss of $11.5 million for the nine months
ended. Our share of MCWR IIs total assets and net loss was $655.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively. As a result of the significant amount of depreciation and amortization expense being recorded by MCWR II in connection with the
acquisition of the First Washington Portfolio in 2005, the joint venture may continue to report a net loss in future years, but is expected to produce positive cash flow from operations. We have the ability to receive additional acquisition fees of
approximately $5.2 million (the Contingent Acquisition Fees) deferred from the original acquisition date of the First Washington Portfolio that are subject to achieving cumulative targeted income levels through 2008. The Contingent
Acquisition Fees will only be recognized if earned, and the recognition of income will be limited to that percentage of MCWR II, or 75.05%, of the joint venture not owned by us. During 2007, MCWR II sold one shopping center to an unrelated party for
$13.5 million for a gain of $566,490.

On August 10, 2007, MCWR-DESCO closed on the acquisition of 32 retail centers for a purchase
price of approximately $396.2 million including debt of approximately $209.5 million. We contributed $29.7 million to the venture for our pro-rata share of the purchase price for our 16.35% equity ownership. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase business combination by MCWR-DESCO. As of September 30, 2007, MCWR-DESCO had total assets of $421.1 million and a net loss of $1.6 million since inception primarily related to depreciation and amortization expense. Our share of the
ventures total assets and net loss was $68.9 million and $230,555, respectively.

Our investment in the five joint ventures with MCW
totals $311.0 million and represents 7.6% of our total assets at September 30, 2007. Our pro-rata share of the assets and net income of these ventures was $899.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively, which represents 22.0% and 1.8% of our
total assets and net income available for common unit holders, respectively.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

In December, 2006, we formed Regency Retail Partners (the Fund), an open-end, infinite-life
investment fund with an ownership interest of 26.8%. During the first quarter of 2007, we reduced our ownership interest to 20% with the admission of additional partners into the Fund and recognized a gain of $2.2 million that had previously been
deferred. The Fund will have the exclusive right to acquire all future RCLP-developed large format community centers, upon stabilization, that meet the Funds investment criteria. A community center is generally defined as a shopping center
with at least 250,000 square feet of GLA including tenant-owned GLA. As of September 30, 2007, the Fund owned five shopping centers, had total assets of $152.5 million and net income of $690,976 for the nine months ended. Our share of the
Funds total assets and net income was $30.4 million and $204,750, respectively. Our share of the Fund represents less than 1% of our total assets and net income available for common unit holders. The Fund acquired three community shopping
centers from us for a sales price of $69.9 million, or $64.5 million on a net basis after excluding our ownership interest, and we recognized a gain of $24.2 million.

Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only that portion of the sales not attributable to our ownership interest. The gains and operations are not recorded as discontinued operations because
of our continuing involvement in these shopping centers. Columbia, RegCal, the joint ventures with MCW, and the Fund intend to continue to acquire retail shopping centers, some of which they may acquire directly from us. For those properties
acquired from unrelated parties, we are required to contribute our pro-rata share of the purchase price to the partnerships.

Notes Payable

Outstanding debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consists of the following (in thousands):



|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | ---------
|                             |  | 2007 |           | 2006
|Notes Payable:               |  |      |           |      |          
|Fixed rate mortgage loans    |  | $    | 211,346   |      | 186,897  
|Variable rate mortgage loans |  |      | 33,541    |      | 68,662   
|Fixed rate unsecured loans   |  |      | 1,597,143 |      | 1,198,827
|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|Total notes payable          |  |      | 1,842,030 |      | 1,454,386
|Unsecured Line of Credit     |  |      | 110,000   |      | 121,000  
|                             |  |      |           |      |          
|Total                        |  | $    | 1,952,030 |      | 1,575,386
|                             |  |      |           |      |          

Mortgage loans are secured and may be prepaid, but could be subject to yield maintenance premiums.
Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, and mature over various terms through 2018. We intend to repay mortgage loans at maturity from proceeds from the Line. Variable interest rates on mortgage loans are
currently based on LIBOR, plus a spread in a range of 90 to 130 basis points. Fixed interest rates on mortgage loans range from 5.22% to 8.95% and average 6.38%.

On June 5, 2007, RCLP completed the sale of $400 million of ten-year senior unsecured notes. The 5.875% notes are due June 15, 2017 and were priced at 99.527% to yield 5.938%. The net proceeds were used to
reduce the unsecured line of credit (the Line).

In February, 2007, we entered into a new loan agreement under the Line which
increased the commitment to $600 million with the right to increase the facility size an additional $150 million subject to additional lender syndication. The Line has a four-year term which expires in 2011 with a one-year extension at our option
and the interest rate was reduced to LIBOR plus .55%. Contractual interest rates were 6.238% at September 30, 2007 and 6.125% at December 31, 2006 based on LIBOR plus .55% and .75%, respectively. At September 30, 2007, the balance on
the Line was $110 million.

The spread on the Line is dependent upon maintaining specific investment-grade ratings. We are also required to
comply, and are in compliance, with certain financial covenants such as Minimum Net Worth, Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value (GAV), Recourse Secured Debt to GAV, Fixed Charge



44



---

##### Table of Contents

Coverage and other covenants customary with this type of unsecured financing. The Line is used primarily to finance the development and acquisition of real
estate, but is also available for general working-capital purposes.

As of September 30, 2007, scheduled principal repayments on notes
payable and the Line were as follows (in thousands):



|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | ------------------- | --------- | - | ------------- | --------- | -
|Scheduled Principal Payments by Year: |  | ScheduledPrincipalPayments |        | Term LoanMaturities |           |   | TotalPayments |          
|Current year                          |  | $                          | 1,094  |                     | 36,377    |   |               | 37,471    |  
|2008                                  |  |                            | 4,259  |                     | 19,620    |   |               | 23,879    |  
|2009                                  |  |                            | 4,338  |                     | 59,131    |   |               | 63,469    |  
|2010                                  |  |                            | 4,210  |                     | 177,231   |   |               | 181,441   |  
|2011 (includes the Line)              |  |                            | 4,273  |                     | 361,157   |   |               | 365,430   |  
|Beyond 5 Years                        |  |                            | 14,240 |                     | 1,266,154 |   |               | 1,280,394 |  
|Unamortized debt discounts, net       |  |                            |       |                     | (54       | ) |               | (54       | )
|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  
|Total                                 |  | $                          | 32,414 |                     | 1,919,616 |   |               | 1,952,030 |  
|                                      |  |                            |        |                     |           |   |               |           |  

Our investments in real estate partnerships had notes and mortgage loans payable of $2.7 billion
at September 30, 2007, which mature through 2028. Our pro-rata share of these loans was $650.1 million, of which 94.4% had average fixed interest rates of 5.3% and the remaining had variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus a spread in a
range of 50 to 100 basis points. The loans are primarily non-recourse, but for those that are guaranteed by a joint venture, our liability does not extend beyond our ownership percentage of the joint venture.

We are exposed to capital market risk such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility related to interest-rate risk, we
originate new debt with fixed interest rates, or we may enter into interest-rate hedging arrangements. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We engage outside experts who evaluate and make
recommendations about hedging strategies when appropriate. We account for derivative instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended
(Statement 133). On March 10, 2006, we entered into four forward-starting interest rate swaps totaling $396.7 million with fixed rates of 5.399%, 5.415%, 5.399% and 5.415%. We designated these swaps as cash flow hedges to fix the
rate on $400 million of new financing expected to occur in 2010 and 2011, and these proceeds will be used to repay maturing debt at that time. The change in fair value of these swaps from inception was a liability of $8.6 million at
September 30, 2007, and is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of changes in partners capital
and comprehensive income (loss).

At September 30, 2007, 92.7% of our total debt had fixed interest rates, compared with 88.0% at
December 31, 2006. We intend to limit the percentage of variable interest-rate debt to be no more than 30% of total debt, which we believe to be an acceptable risk. Currently, our variable rate debt represents 7.3% of our total debt. Based upon
the variable interest-rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2007, if variable interest rates were to increase by 1%, our annual interest expense would increase by $1.4 million.



45



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Transactions

From time to time, we issue equity in the form of exchangeable operating partnership units or preferred units of RCLP, or in the form of common or preferred stock of Regency Centers Corporation. As previously
discussed, these sources of long-term equity financing allow us to fund our growth while maintaining a conservative capital structure.

Preferred Units

We have issued Preferred Units in various amounts since 1998, the net proceeds of which were used to reduce the
balance of the Line. We issue Preferred Units primarily to institutional investors in private placements. Generally, the Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holders for Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock after a specified date at an exchange
rate of one share for one unit. The Preferred Units and the related Preferred Stock are not convertible into Regency common stock. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, only the Series D Preferred Units were outstanding with a face
value of $50 million and a fixed distribution rate of 7.45%. These Units may be called by us in 2009, and have no stated maturity or mandatory redemption. Included in the Series D Preferred Units are original issuance costs of $842,023 that will be
expensed if they are redeemed in the future.

Preferred Units of General Partner and Regency Preferred Stock

As of September 30, 2007 we had three series of Preferred stock outstanding, two of which
underlie depositary shares held by the public. The depositary shares each represent 1/10thof a share of the underlying preferred stock and have a
liquidation preference of $25 per depository share. In 2003, we issued 7.45% Series 3 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock underlying 3 million depositary shares. In 2004, we issued 7.25% Series 4 Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock
underlying 5 million depositary shares. In 2005, we issued 3 million shares, or $75 million of 6.70% Series 5 Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $25 per share. All series of Preferred Stock are perpetual, are not convertible
into common stock of the Company and are redeemable at par upon our election beginning five years after the issuance date. The terms of the Preferred Stock do not contain any unconditional obligations that would require us to redeem the securities
at any time or for any purpose.

Common Stock

On April 5, 2005, we entered into an agreement to sell 4,312,500 shares of common stock to an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) at $46.60 per share, in connection with a forward
sale agreement (the Forward Sale Agreement). On August 1, 2005, we issued 3,782,500 shares to Citigroup for net proceeds of approximately $175.5 million and on September 7, 2005, the remaining 530,000 shares were issued for net
proceeds of $24.4 million. The proceeds from the sales were used to reduce the Line and redeem the Series E and F Preferred Units.

Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates

Knowledge about our accounting policies is necessary for a complete understanding of our financial results, and
discussion and analysis of these results. The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make certain estimates that impact the balance of assets and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and
expenses during a financial reporting period. These accounting estimates are based upon, but not limited to, our judgments about historical results, current economic activity, and industry accounting standards. They are considered to be critical
because of their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from those judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. We review these estimates on a
periodic basis to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts we may ultimately realize could differ from such estimates.

Revenue
Recognition and Tenant Receivables - Tenant receivables represent revenues recognized in our financial statements, and include base rent, percentage rent, and expense recoveries



46



---

##### Table of Contents

from tenants for common area maintenance costs, insurance and real estate taxes. We analyze tenant receivables, historical bad debt levels, customer
creditworthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, we analyze the accounts of tenants in bankruptcy, and we estimate the recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.
Our reported net income is directly affected by our estimate of the recoverability of tenant receivables.

Recognition of Gains from the
Sales of Real Estate - We account for profit recognition on sales of real estate in accordance with SFAS Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Profits from sales of real estate will not be recognized under the full
accrual method by us unless (i) a sale has been consummated; (ii) the buyers initial and continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; (iii) we have transferred to the buyer the usual
risks and rewards of ownership; and (iv) we do not have significant continuing involvement with the property. Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only that portion of the sales not attributable to our ownership
interest.

Capitalization of Costs - We capitalize the acquisition of land, the construction of buildings and other specifically
identifiable development costs incurred by recording them into Properties in Development on our consolidated balance sheets. Other development costs include pre-development costs essential to the development of the property, as well as,
interest, real estate taxes, and direct employee costs incurred during the development period. Pre-development costs are incurred prior to land acquisition during the due diligence phase and include contract deposits, legal, engineering and other
professional fees related to evaluating the feasibility of developing a shopping center. If we determine that the development of a specific project undergoing due diligence was no longer probable, we would immediately expense all related capitalized
pre-development costs not considered recoverable. Interest costs are capitalized into each development project based on applying our weighted average borrowing rate to that portion of the actual development costs expended. We generally cease
interest cost capitalization when the property is available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but in no event would we capitalize interest on the project beyond 12 months after substantial completion of the building
shell. We have a large staff of employees who support the due diligence, land acquisition, construction, leasing, and financial analysis (the Investment Group) of our development program. All direct internal costs related to these
development activities are capitalized as part of each development project. During 2007 we capitalized $29 million of direct costs incurred by the Investment Group. If future accounting standards limit the amount of internal costs that may be
capitalized, or if our development activity were to decline significantly without a proportionate decrease in internal costs, we could incur a significant increase in our operating expenses and a reduction in net income.

Real Estate Acquisitions - Upon acquisition of operating real estate properties, we estimate the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of
land, building and improvements), and identified intangible assets, liabilities (consisting of above- and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships) and assumed debt in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations (Statement 141). Based on these estimates, we allocate the purchase price to the applicable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We utilize methods similar to those used by independent appraisers in estimating the
fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. We evaluate the useful lives of amortizable intangible assets each reporting period and account for any changes in estimated useful lives over the revised remaining useful life.

Valuation of Real Estate Investments - Our long-lived assets, primarily real estate held for investment, are carried at cost unless circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. The review involves a number of assumptions and
estimates used to determine whether impairment exists. Depending on the asset, we use varying methods to determine fair value of the asset such as i) estimating discounted future cash flows, ii) determining resale values by market, or iii) applying
a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods of determining fair value can fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the general economy of those markets
in which we operate, tenant credit quality and demand for new retail stores. If we determine that the carrying amount of a property is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value, we will write down the asset to fair value for
held-and-used assets and to fair value less costs to sell for held-for-sale assets.



47



---

##### Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations - The application of current accounting principles that govern the classification
of any of our properties as held-for-sale on the balance sheet, or the presentation of results of operations and gains on the sale of these properties as discontinued, requires management to make certain significant judgments. In evaluating whether
a property meets the criteria set forth by SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (Statement 144), we make a determination as to the point in time that it is probable that a sale
will be consummated. Given the nature of all real estate sales contracts, it is not unusual for such contracts to allow potential buyers a period of time to evaluate the property prior to formal acceptance of the contract. In addition, certain other
matters critical to the final sale, such as financing arrangements often remain pending even upon contract acceptance. As a result, properties under contract may not close within the expected time period, or may not close at all. Due to these
uncertainties, it is not likely that we can meet the criteria of Statement 144 prior to the sale formally closing. Therefore, any properties categorized as held-for-sale represent only those properties that management has determined are probable to
close within the requirements set forth in Statement 144. Prior to sale, we evaluate the extent of involvement and significance of cash flows it will have with a property subsequent to its sale, in order to determine if the results of operations and
gain on sale should be reflected as discontinued. Consistent with Statement 144, any property sold in which the Company has significant continuing involvement or cash flows (most often joint ventures) is not considered to be discontinued. In
addition, any property which we sell to an unrelated third party, but for which we retain a property or asset management function, is not considered discontinued. Therefore, based on our evaluation of Statement 144, only properties sold, or to be
sold, to unrelated third parties, where we will have no significant continuing involvement or significant cash flows are classified as discontinued.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures - In addition to owning real estate directly, we invest in real estate through our co-investment joint ventures. Joint venturing provides us with a capital source to acquire
real estate, and to earn our pro-rata share of the net income from the joint ventures in addition to fees for services. As asset and property manager, we conduct the business of the Unconsolidated Properties held in the joint ventures in the same
way that we conduct the business of the Consolidated Properties that are wholly-owned; therefore, the Critical Accounting Policies as described are also applicable to our investments in the joint ventures. We account for all investments in which we
do not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. We have determined that these investments are not variable interest entities as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and do not require consolidation under EITF Issue No. 04-5 Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or
Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights or American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures (SOP 78-9),
and therefore, are subject to the voting interest model in determining our basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property acquisitions and dispositions, financings, annual budgets and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval
of all partners, or in the case of The Fund, its advisory committee.

Income Tax Status - The prevailing assumption underlying the
operation of our business is that Regency will continue to operate in order to qualify as a REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to meet certain income and asset tests on a periodic basis to ensure that we continue to
qualify as a REIT. As a REIT, we are allowed to reduce taxable income by all or a portion of our distributions to stockholders. We evaluate the transactions that we enter into and determine their impact on our REIT status. Determining our taxable
income, calculating distributions, and evaluating transactions requires us to make certain judgments and estimates as to the positions we take in our interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code. Because many types of transactions are susceptible to
varying interpretations under federal and state income tax laws and regulations, our positions are subject to change at a later date upon final determination by the taxing authorities.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB Issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Statement 159). This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. Statement 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, although early adoption is
allowed. We do not believe that the adoption of Statement 159 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies to accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except for share-based payment transactions under FASB Statement No. 123(R). This
Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As Statement 157 does not require any new fair value measurements or remeasurements of previously computed fair values, we do not believe
adoption of this Statement will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax
law. This Interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Under FIN 48, tax
positions shall initially be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and relevant facts. We adopted this Interpretation effective
January 1, 2007 and the adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Results from Operations

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2007 to 2006:

Our revenues increased by $14.4 million, or 14% to $117.0 million as of September 30, 2007 as compared to the three month period in 2006 summarized in the following table (in thousands):



|                                       |  |                                   |         |      |         |        |        |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | ------- | ------ | ------ | -
|                                       |  | Three months ending September 30, |         |      |        
|                                       |  | 2007                              |         | 2006 |         | Change |       
|Minimum rent                           |  | $                                 | 81,033  |      | 74,006  |        | 7,027  |  
|Percentage rent                        |  |                                   | 889     |      | 976     |        | (87    | )
|Recoveries from tenants                |  |                                   | 24,269  |      | 22,308  |        | 1,961  |  
|Management, acquisition and other fees |  |                                   | 10,789  |      | 5,327   |        | 5,462  |  
|                                       |  |                                   |         |      |         |        |        |  
|Total revenues                         |  | $                                 | 116,980 |      | 102,617 |        | 14,363 |  
|                                       |  |                                   |         |      |         |        |        |  

The increase in revenues was primarily related to higher minimum rent from growth in rental rates
from renewing expiring leases or re-leasing vacant space in the operating properties, and from new minimum rent generated from acquisitions and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year. In addition to collecting
minimum rent from our tenants, we also collect percentage rent based upon their sales volumes. Recoveries from tenants represents reimbursements from tenants for their pro-rata share of the operating, maintenance and real estate tax expenses that we
incur to operate our shopping centers. Recoveries increased as a result of an increase in our operating expenses.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

We earn fees for asset management, property management, leasing, acquisition and financing services that
we provide to our joint ventures and third parties summarized as follows (in thousands):



|                               |  |                                   |        |      |       |        |      
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | ----- | ------ | -----
|                               |  | Three months ending September 30, |        |     
|                               |  | 2007                              |        | 2006 |       | Change
|Property management fees       |  | $                                 | 3,563  |      | 2,395 |        | 1,168
|Asset management fees          |  |                                   | 2,873  |      | 1,379 |        | 1,494
|Commissions                    |  |                                   | 123    |      | 91    |        | 32   
|Acquisition and financing fees |  |                                   | 4,230  |      | 1,462 |        | 2,768
|                               |  |                                   |        |      |       |        |      
|                               |  | $                                 | 10,789 |      | 5,327 |        | 5,462
|                               |  |                                   |        |      |       |        |      

Property management fees increased for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as a result
of managing the entire First Washington Portfolio for MCWR II as compared to managing approximately 50% of the portfolio for the same period in 2006 due to a contractual agreement. Asset management fees were higher in 2007 because we did not begin
earning asset management fees until December 2006 from MCWR II due to a contractual agreement related to the First Washington acquisition, or from the Fund since it did not begin operating until December 2006. We received $3.2 million in acquisition
fees from MCWR-DESCO related to the acquisition of 32 retail centers, which is included in acquisition and financing fees.

Our operating
expenses increased by $9.5 million, or 18%, to $63.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 related to increased operating and maintenance costs, general and administrative costs and depreciation expense, as further described
below. The following table summarizes our operating expenses (in thousands):



|                                             |  |                                   |        |      |        |   |        |      
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | -----
|                                             |  | Three months ending September 30, |        |      |       
|                                             |  | 2007                              |        | 2006 |        |   | Change
|Operating, maintenance and real estate taxes |  | $                                 | 25,463 |      | 22,806 |   |        | 2,657
|General and administrative                   |  |                                   | 12,159 |      | 10,765 |   |        | 1,394
|Depreciation and amortization                |  |                                   | 24,364 |      | 21,384 |   |        | 2,980
|Other expenses, net                          |  |                                   | 1,625  |      | (825   | ) |        | 2,450
|                                             |  |                                   |        |      |        |   |        |      
|Total operating expenses                     |  | $                                 | 63,611 |      | 54,130 |   |        | 9,481
|                                             |  |                                   |        |      |        |   |        |      

The increase in operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes was primarily due to acquisitions
and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year, and to general price increases incurred by the operating properties. On average, approximately 80% of these costs are recovered from our tenants as expense reimbursements
and included in our revenues.

The increase in general and administrative expense is related to annual salary increases and higher costs
associated with incentive compensation in addition to increased staffing and recruiting costs to manage the growth in our shopping center development program.

The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily related to acquisitions and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year.

Other expenses increased due to tax expense recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to a tax benefit recorded for the
three months ended September 30, 2006.



50



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in interest expense for the three months ending
September 30, 2007 and 2006:



|                          |  |                                   |         |   |      |        |   |        |        |  
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | ------ | -
|                          |  | Three months ending September 30, |         |   |      |       
|                          |  | 2007                              |         |   | 2006 |        |   | Change |       
|Interest on the Line      |  | $                                 | 1,326   |   |      | 2,218  |   |        | (892   | )
|Interest on notes payable |  |                                   | 30,440  |   |      | 25,293 |   |        | 5,147  |  
|Capitalized interest      |  |                                   | (10,411 | ) |      | (6,526 | ) |        | (3,885 | )
|Interest income           |  |                                   | (840    | ) |      | (819   | ) |        | (21    | )
|                          |  |                                   |         |   |      |        |   |        |        |  
|                          |  | $                                 | 20,515  |   |      | 20,166 |   |        | 349    |  
|                          |  |                                   |         |   |      |        |   |        |        |  

Interest expense on notes payable increased due to higher outstanding balances associated with the
acquisitions purchased in 2007 and the $400 million ten-year unsecured notes issued in June 2007. The increase in development activity resulted in an increase in capitalized interest.

Our equity in income of real estate partnerships (joint ventures) increased $1.1 million to $1.7 million as follows (in thousands):



|                                                 |  |                                   |       |   |      |        |   |        |       |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | ----- | -
|                                                 |  | Three months ending September 30, |       |   |      |       
|                                                 |  | 2007                              |       |   | 2006 |        |   | Change |      
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR I)           |  | $                                 | 729   |   |      | 979    |   |        | (250  | )
|Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR I)            |  |                                   | 154   |   |      | 164    |   |        | (10   | )
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)       |  |                                   | (306  | ) |      | (1,614 | ) |        | 1,308 |  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency III (MCWR II)      |  |                                   | 29    |   |      | 4      |   |        | 25    |  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency-DESCO (MCWR-DESCO) |  |                                   | (231  | ) |      |       |   |        | (231  | )
|Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)      |  |                                   | 632   |   |      | 551    |   |        | 81    |  
|Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)                   |  |                                   | (7    | ) |      | (8     | ) |        | 1     |  
|Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)          |  |                                   | 174   |   |      | 27     |   |        | 147   |  
|RegCal, LLC (RegCal)                             |  |                                   | 312   |   |      | 107    |   |        | 205   |  
|Regency Retail Partners (the Fund) (1)           |  |                                   | (1    | ) |      |       |   |        | (1    | )
|Other investments in real estate partnerships    |  |                                   | 192   |   |      | 368    |   |        | (176  | )
|                                                 |  |                                   |       |   |      |        |   |        |       |  
|Total                                            |  | $                                 | 1,677 |   |      | 578    |   |        | 1,099 |  
|                                                 |  |                                   |       |   |      |        |   |        |       |  

---

|(1) | At December 31, 2006, our ownership interest in Regency Retail Partners was
26.8%.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The increase in our equity in income (loss) of real estate partnerships is related to growth in rental
income in the shopping centers owned by the joint ventures in addition to reductions in depreciation and amortization expense recorded in MCWR II associated with shopping centers sold during 2006.

Gains from the sale of real estate were $5.5 million in 2007 as compared to $15.4 million in 2006. The three months ended September 30, 2007
included $1.1 million in gains from the sale of six out-parcels for net proceeds of $15.8 million, $2.4 million in gains from the sale of one property in development to a joint venture for net proceeds of $6.9 million, and $1.9 million in gains from
our share of a contractual earn out payment related to a property previously sold to a joint venture. The three months ended September 30, 2006 included $3.1 million in gains from the sale of four out-parcels for net proceeds of $13.5 million
and $12.3 million in gains from the sale of four properties in development to a joint venture for net proceeds of $58.4 million. These gains are included in continuing operations rather than discontinued operations because they were either
properties that had no operating income, or they were properties sold to joint ventures and we have continuing involvement through our equity investment.

Income from discontinued operations was $3.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 related to one operating property sold to an unrelated party for net proceeds of $14.9 million. Income from
discontinued operations was $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006



51



---

##### Table of Contents

related to one operating property sold to an unrelated party for net proceeds of $10.0 million and to the operations of shopping centers sold or classified
as held-for-sale in 2007 and 2006. In compliance with Statement 144, if we sell an asset in the current year, we are required to re-present its operations into discontinued operations for all prior periods. This practice results in a re-presentation
of amounts previously reported as continuing operations into discontinued operations.

Net income for common unit holders for the three
months ended decreased $2.6 million to $37.3 million in 2007 as compared with $39.9 million in 2006 primarily related to lower gains recognized from the sale of real estate as described above. Diluted earnings per unit was $0.53 in 2007 as compared
to $0.57 in 2006 or 7% lower.

Results from Operations

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to 2006:

Our revenues increased by $24.4 million, or 8% to $332.2
million as of September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine month period in 2006 summarized in the following table (in thousands):



|                                       |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | ------- | ------ | ------ | -
|                                       |  | Nine months ending September 30, |         |      |        
|                                       |  | 2007                             |         | 2006 |         | Change |       
|Minimum rent                           |  | $                                | 236,206 |      | 218,961 |        | 17,245 |  
|Percentage rent                        |  |                                  | 1,965   |      | 1,902   |        | 63     |  
|Recoveries from tenants                |  |                                  | 69,324  |      | 62,216  |        | 7,108  |  
|Management, acquisition and other fees |  |                                  | 24,667  |      | 24,728  |        | (61    | )
|                                       |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  
|Total revenues                         |  | $                                | 332,162 |      | 307,807 |        | 24,355 |  
|                                       |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  

The increase in revenues was primarily related to higher minimum rent from growth in rental rates
from renewing expiring leases or re-leasing vacant space in the operating properties, and from new minimum rent generated from acquisitions and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year. In addition to collecting
minimum rent from our tenants, we also collect percentage rent based upon their sales volumes. Recoveries from tenants represents reimbursements from tenants for their pro-rata share of the operating, maintenance and real estate tax expenses that we
incur to operate our shopping centers. Recoveries increased as a result of an increase in our operating expenses.

We earn fees for asset
management, property management, leasing, acquisition and financing services that we provide to our joint ventures and third parties summarized as follows (in thousands):



|                               |  |                                  |        |      |        |        |        |  
|------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | ------ | ------ | ------ | -
|                               |  | Nine months ending September 30, |        |      |       
|                               |  | 2007                             |        | 2006 |        | Change |       
|Property management fees       |  | $                                | 10,272 |      | 7,727  |        | 2,545  |  
|Asset management fees          |  |                                  | 8,119  |      | 4,144  |        | 3,975  |  
|Commissions                    |  |                                  | 262    |      | 432    |        | (170   | )
|Acquisition and financing fees |  |                                  | 6,014  |      | 12,425 |        | (6,411 | )
|                               |  |                                  |        |      |        |        |        |  
|                               |  | $                                | 24,667 |      | 24,728 |        | (61    | )
|                               |  |                                  |        |      |        |        |        |  

Property management fees increased for the nine months ending September 30, 2007 as a result
of managing the entire First Washington Portfolio for MCWR II as compared to managing approximately 50% of the portfolio for the same period in 2006. Asset management fees were higher in 2007 because we did not begin earning asset management fees
until December 2006 from MCWR II due to a contractual agreement or from the Fund since it did not begin operating until December 2006. Acquisition and financing fees earned in 2007 include a $3.2 million acquisition fee from MCWR-DESCO related to
the acquisition of 32 retail centers described above. Acquisition and financing fees earned in 2006 include the recognition of a deferred portion of the acquisition fee from MCWR II related to the First Washington acquisition completed in 2005.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

Our operating expenses increased by $16.3 million, or 10%, to $183.2 million as of September 30,
2007 related to increased operating and maintenance costs, general and administrative costs and depreciation expense, as further described below. The following table summarizes our operating expenses (in thousands):



|                                             |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | ------- | ------ | ------ | -
|                                             |  | Nine months ending September 30, |         |      |        
|                                             |  | 2007                             |         | 2006 |         | Change |       
|Operating, maintenance and real estate taxes |  | $                                | 74,715  |      | 67,526  |        | 7,189  |  
|General and administrative                   |  |                                  | 37,363  |      | 32,398  |        | 4,965  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                |  |                                  | 67,803  |      | 62,406  |        | 5,397  |  
|Other expenses, net                          |  |                                  | 3,346   |      | 4,565   |        | (1,219 | )
|                                             |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  
|Total operating expenses                     |  | $                                | 183,227 |      | 166,895 |        | 16,332 |  
|                                             |  |                                  |         |      |         |        |        |  

The increase in operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes was primarily due to acquisitions
and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year, and to general price increases incurred by the operating properties. On average, approximately 80% of these costs are recovered from our tenants as expense reimbursements
and included in our revenues.

The increase in general and administrative expense is related to annual salary increases and higher costs
associated with incentive compensation in addition to increased staffing and recruiting costs to manage the growth in our shopping center development program.

The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily related to acquisitions and recently completed developments commencing operations in the current year.

The reduction in other expenses is a result of recording a tax benefit of $712,680 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to tax
expense of $1.6 million for the same period in 2006 for Regency Realty Group, Inc. (RRG), our taxable REIT subsidiary. RRG is subject to federal and state income taxes and files separate tax returns.

The following table presents the change in interest expense for the nine months ending September 30, 2007 and 2006:



|                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |         |   |        |        |  
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ------ | ------ | -
|                          |  | Nine months ending September 30, |         |   |      |        
|                          |  | 2007                             |         |   | 2006 |         |   | Change |       
|Interest on the Line      |  | $                                | 7,642   |   |      | 5,054   |   |        | 2,588  |  
|Interest on notes payable |  |                                  | 81,013  |   |      | 74,488  |   |        | 6,525  |  
|Capitalized interest      |  |                                  | (26,070 | ) |      | (16,931 | ) |        | (9,139 | )
|Interest income           |  |                                  | (2,370  | ) |      | (3,347  | ) |        | 977    |  
|                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |         |   |        |        |  
|                          |  | $                                | 60,215  |   |      | 59,264  |   |        | 951    |  
|                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |         |   |        |        |  

Interest expense on the Line and notes payable increased due to higher outstanding balances on the
Line during the year associated with an increase in properties in development, the acquisitions purchased in 2007, and the $400 million ten-year unsecured notes issued in June 2007. The increase in development activity also resulted in an increase
in capitalized interest.

Our equity in income (loss) of real estate partnerships (joint ventures) increased $5.3 million to $6.2 million
as of September 30, 2007 as follows (in thousands):



53



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |        |   |        |       |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | ----- | -
|                                                 |  | Nine months ending September 30, |        |   |      |       
|                                                 |  | 2007                             |        |   | 2006 |        |   | Change |      
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR I)           |  | $                                | 5,210  |   |      | 3,711  |   |        | 1,499 |  
|Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR I)            |  |                                  | 333    |   |      | 468    |   |        | (135  | )
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)       |  |                                  | (2,890 | ) |      | (6,194 | ) |        | 3,304 |  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency III (MCWR II)      |  |                                  | 41     |   |      | (3     | ) |        | 44    |  
|Macquarie CountryWide-Regency-DESCO (MCWR-DESCO) |  |                                  | (231   | ) |      |       |   |        | (231  | )
|Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)      |  |                                  | 1,766  |   |      | 1,631  |   |        | 135   |  
|Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)                   |  |                                  | (30    | ) |      | (59    | ) |        | 29    |  
|Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)          |  |                                  | 205    |   |      | 60     |   |        | 145   |  
|RegCal, LLC (RegCal)                             |  |                                  | 548    |   |      | 364    |   |        | 184   |  
|Regency Retail Partners (the Fund) (1)           |  |                                  | 204    |   |      |       |   |        | 204   |  
|Other investments in real estate partnerships    |  |                                  | 1,089  |   |      | 1,017  |   |        | 72    |  
|                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |        |   |        |       |  
|Total                                            |  | $                                | 6,245  |   |      | 995    |   |        | 5,250 |  
|                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |        |   |        |       |  

---

|(1) | At December 31, 2006, our ownership interest in the Fund was 26.8%.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

The increase in our equity in income (loss) of real estate partnerships is related to growth in rental income in
the shopping centers owned by the joint ventures in addition to reductions in depreciation and amortization expense recorded in MCWR II associated with shopping centers sold during 2006.

Gains from the sale of real estate were $34.6 million in 2007 as compared to $40.7 million in 2006. The nine months ended September 30, 2007
included $6.0 million in gains from the sale of 22 out-parcels for net proceeds of $50.2 million, $26.4 million from the sale of two properties in development to a joint venture for net proceeds of $64.5 million; and a $2.2 million gain related to
the partial sale of our interest in the Fund as discussed previously. The nine months ended September 30, 2006 included $18.9 million in gains from the sale of 21 out-parcels for net proceeds of $48.1 million, $12.3 million from the sale of
four properties in development to a joint venture for net proceeds of $58.4 million; as well as a $9.5 million gain related to the partial sale of our interest in MCWR II as previously discussed. These gains are included in continuing operations
rather than discontinued operations because they were either properties that had no operating income, or they were properties sold to joint ventures where we have continuing involvement through our equity investment.

Income from discontinued operations was $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 related to two operating properties and two
development properties sold to unrelated parties for net proceeds of $96.4 million and the classification of one property to held-for-sale. Income from discontinued operations was $38.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
related to five operating properties and one development property sold to unrelated parties for net proceeds of $81.0 million and to the operations of shopping centers sold or classified as held-for-sale in 2007 and 2006. In compliance with
Statement 144, if we sell an asset in the current year, we are required to re-present its operations into discontinued operations for all prior periods. This practice results in a re-presentation of amounts previously reported as continuing
operations into discontinued operations.

Net income for common unit holders for the nine months ended decreased $4.9 million to $134.7
million in 2007 as compared with $139.5 million in 2006 primarily related to higher gains recognized from the sale of real estate in 2006 as described above. Diluted earnings per unit was $1.92 in 2007 as compared to $2.00 in 2006 or 4% lower.



54



---

##### Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations as they apply to our shopping centers pertaining to chemicals used by the dry cleaning industry, the existence of asbestos in older shopping centers, and
underground petroleum storage tanks (USTs). We believe that the tenants who currently operate dry cleaning plants or gas stations do so in accordance with current laws and regulations. Generally, we use all legal means to cause tenants to
remove dry cleaning plants from our shopping centers or convert them to non-chlorinated solvent systems. Where available, we have applied and been accepted into state-sponsored environmental programs. We have a blanket environmental insurance policy
that covers us against third-party liabilities and remediation costs on shopping centers that currently have no known environmental contamination. We have also placed environmental insurance, where possible, on specific properties with known
contamination, in order to mitigate our environmental risk. We monitor the shopping centers containing environmental issues and in certain cases voluntarily remediate the sites. We also have legal obligations to remediate certain sites and we are in
the process of doing so. We estimate the cost associated with these legal obligations to be approximately $4.0 million, all of which has been reserved. We believe that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not have a
material affect on our financial position, liquidity, or operations; however, we can give no assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to our shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous
owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to us; that the current environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or
by unrelated third parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to us.

Inflation

Inflation has remained relatively low and has had a minimal impact on the operating
performance of our shopping centers; however, substantially all of our long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling us to receive percentage rent based on
tenants gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise; and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. Such escalation clauses are often related to increases in the consumer price index
or similar inflation indices. In addition, many of our leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits us to seek increased rents upon re-rental at market rates. Most of our leases require tenants to pay their pro-rata share of operating
expenses, including common-area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Market Risk

We are exposed to two components of interest-rate risk. Our Line has a variable interest rate that is based
upon LIBOR plus a spread of 55 basis points. LIBOR rates charged on the Line change monthly. Based upon our current Line balance, a 1% increase in LIBOR would equate to an additional $1.1 million of interest costs per year. The spread on the Line is
dependent upon maintaining specific credit ratings. If our credit ratings were downgraded, the spread on the Line would increase resulting in higher interest costs. We are also exposed to higher interest rates when we refinance our existing
long-term fixed rate debt. The objective of our interest-rate risk management is to limit the impact of interest-rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we borrow primarily at
fixed interest rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest-rate swaps, caps or treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest-rate risk on a related financial instrument. We do not enter into derivative or
interest-rate transactions for speculative purposes. We have approximately $437 million of fixed rate debt maturing in 2010 and 2011, which includes $400 million of unsecured long-term debt. During 2006 we entered into four forward-starting interest
rate swaps totaling $396.7 million with fixed rates of 5.399%, 5.415%, 5.399% and 5.415%. We designated these swaps as cash flow hedges to fix the future interest rates on the $400 million of financing expected to occur in 2010 and 2011.

Our interest-rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal cash flows (in thousands), weighted average
interest rates of remaining debt, and the fair value of total debt (in thousands) as of September 30, 2007, by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest-rate changes.



|                                                                        |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |   |      |         |   |            |           |   |       |           |       |          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---------- | --------- | - | ----- | --------- | ----- | ---------
|                                                                        |  | 2007 |        |   | 2008 |        |   | 2009 |        |   | 2010 |         |   | 2011 |         |   | Thereafter |           |   | Total |           | Value
|Fixed rate debt                                                         |  | $    | 9,971  |   |      | 23,879 |   |      | 57,428 |   |      | 181,441 |   |      | 255,430 |   |            | 1,280,394 |   |       | 1,808,543 |       | 1,814,761
|Average interest rate for all fixed rate debt                           |  |      | 6.33   | % |      | 6.43   | % |      | 6.38   | % |      | 6.15    | % |      | 5.81    | % |            | 5.81      | % |       |           |       |          
|                                                                        |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |     
|Variable rate LIBOR debt                                                |  | $    | 27,500 |   |      |       |   |      | 6,041  |   |      |        |   |      | 110,000 |   |            |          |   |       | 143,541   |       | 143,541  
|                                                                        |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |     
|Average interest rate for all variable rate debt all variable rate debt |  |      | 5.54   | % |      |       |   |      | 5.48   | % |      |        |   |      | 4.55    | % |            |          |   |       |           |       |          

As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of September 30, 2007, it does
not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table above, the information presented above has limited predictive value. As a result, our ultimate realized
gain or loss with respect to interest-rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time, and actual interest rates.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 4. | Controls and Procedures
|------- | -----------------------

Under the supervision and
with the participation of the Partnerships management, including the Partnerships Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Partnership has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and, based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure
controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in the Partnerships internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during the third quarter of 2007 and that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal controls over financial reporting.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II  OTHER INFORMATION



|Item 1. | Legal Proceedings
|------- | -----------------

We are a party to various legal proceedings,
which arise, in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation nor to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of which would, in our judgment based on information currently available
to us, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.



|Item 1A. | Risk Factors
|-------- | ------------

There have been no material changes from the risk
factors disclosed in Item 1A. of Part I of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

N/A



|Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|------- | -------------------------------

None



|Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

None



|Item 5. | Other Information
|------- | -----------------

None



|Item 6. | Exhibits
|------- | --------



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.1  |  | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Regency filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K on August 28, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                     
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                     
|     | 
|31.3 |  | Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Operating Officer                                                                                                     
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                    
|     | 
|32.2 |  | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                    
|     | 
|32.3 |  | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Operating Officer                                                                                                    



58



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|                       |  |                                                  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 5, 2007 |  | REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.                           
|                       |  | By: Regency Centers Corporation, General Partner
|                       |  |                                                 
|                       |  | By:                                              |  | /s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|                       |  |                                                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

| |  |     |  |                                                       
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  |    
| |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Christian Leavitt                              
| |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer



59