alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
94

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Kansas

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $27.9 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 4,400

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 61,200

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $1,128 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $103.9 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $58.0 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $161.9 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 17%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$8.4 $10.5 $2.91 $3.64

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$1.3 $1.9 $0.45 $0.66

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $7.5 $11.9 $2.60 $4.12

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$1.7 $2.4 $0.60 $0.84

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.9 $1.2 $0.30 $0.42

TOTAL $19.8 $27.9 $6.86 $9.68

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
# NATIONAL ALLOWANCE (NAPA) LOCAL STOCK NUMBER REQUEST FORM

# PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE INFORMATION AND ANY OTHER PERTINENT

**INFORMATION FOR THE ITEM REQUESTED.**

MILITARY INSTALLATION(S) REQUESTING PRODUCT**:____________________________________________________**

**________________________________________________________________________________________________________**

MANUFACTURER NAME: ___________________________________________________  NAPA AGREEMENT NO:________

APPROVED SOURCE _________________________ ESTABLISHMENT # ________________________________

FOR SEAFOOD VETCOM __________________________USDC_________________________________________

BRAND NAME OF PRODUCT: ____________________________________________________________________

PLANT NAME/LOCATION ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________

MANUFACTURER SKU#: ___________________ COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: ______________________________

**CHECK ONE:**

___FRESH	____FROZEN 	____REFRIGERATED 	 ____SHELF STABLE         ____CANNED

OTHER (please specify) _______________________________________________________________________

DESCRIPTION (brief description of product): __________________________________________________________

VARIETY/COLOR/FLAVOR: ______________________________________________________________________

GRADE OF PRODUCT: ___________________________________________________________________________

FOR MEATS:

NAMP/IMPS#: _______________ WEIGHT RANGE OR MAXIMUM WEIGHT _____________________

**PROCESSING**

  ____RAW    _____PRECOOKED         _____FULLY COOKED                   ____OTHER______________________

 ____BATTERED         ____BREADED        ____MARINATED            ____SEASONED

____CUT             ____CHOPPED          ____DICED          ____SHREDDED        ____SLICED         _____GROUND

**PACK**

    ____BULK             ____INDIVIDUALLY WRAPPED PORTIONS

ITEM WEIGHT: ___________________ COUNT PER POUND: _______________________________________

PRODUCT SIZE: _______________________________________________________________________________

UNITS PER CASE: _______________________________________________________________________________

**PACKAGING**

CAN/CONTAINER SIZE: _________________________________________________________________________

CONTAINER MATERIAL (GLASS/PLASTIC/METAL): ________________________________________________

PRIME VENDOR’S NAME: _______________________________________________________________________

NAPA ALLOWANCE (per case/lb/co/bt):____________________________________________________________________________
Letter to Altis



 Exhibit 10.1(b) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited 

2 Hill Street St 
 Helier, Jersey 

Channel Islands JE2 4UA 
 Attention:
Mr. Stephen Hedgecock 
 Re:    Management Agreement Renewals 

Dear Mr. Hedgecock: 
 We are writing with
respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions
of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

					
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	
	ALTIS PARTNERS (JERSEY) LIMITED
		
	By:	 	 /s/ S. Hedgecock

		 	Print Name:	 	S. Hedgecock
		 	JM/sr
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RICHARD A. CASTILE,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2014-7051

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-2145, Judge William A. Moorman.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, for claimant-appellant.

STEVEN MICHAEL MAGER, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by PHYLLIS JO BAUNACH, STUART F. DELERY,

ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CLAUDIA BURKE; DAVID J.
 

BARRANS, RACHAEL BRANT, Office of General Counsel, 

Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and DYK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $15.66 CWT 0.965 $15.11

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.0728 LB 3.5 $10.75

Class I Price $25.87

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.99 CWT 0.965 $14.47

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.1373 LB 3.5 $10.98

Class I Price $25.45

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.42

(4) Price change per gallon $0.04

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.02

Price change per quart $0.01

Price change per pint $0.00

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.04

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.02

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.00

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: June 5th, 2022
Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreements



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. 

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350 
 Houston, Texas 77056

 Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewal 
 Dear Mr. Annunziato: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 AAA Master Fund LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund LTD 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 
  


			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony Annunziato

		 	Print Name: Anthony Annunziato
	
	JM/sr
No. 11-6110.

#### Clay Alexander, Petitioner v. Tom Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 512,

181 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7797.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 738.
The Honorable Mary Ann Cohen, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court. 1 United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3709

___________ Elmer Webb, Sr., * * Petitioner, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: March 4, 1998 Filed: March 10, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Elmer Webb, Sr., appeals the United States Tax Court & s dismissal of his action 1 forlack of subject matter jurisdiction. After a careful review of the record and th e parties & submissions on appeal, we aff irm the Tax Court & s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reject Webb & s other arguments on appeal as without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                         RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

                               Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS







      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26659) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated
1997 Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
February 6, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Reliability Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.






                                         BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP  


Houston, Texas
March 13, 1998
































                                    33
No. 11-174.

#### Garden Grove Unified School District, Petitioner v. C.B., a Minor, By and Through His Guardian ad Litem, Alexis Baquerizo.

565 U.S. 977, 132 S. Ct. 500,

181 L. Ed. 2d 347,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7833.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 1155.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.73 CWT 0.965 $11.32

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9038 LB 3.5 $6.66

Class I Price $17.98

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.66 CWT 0.965 $10.29

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9421 LB 3.5 $6.80

Class I Price $17.08

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.90

(4) Price change per gallon $0.08

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.04

Price change per quart $0.02

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.08

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.04

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.02

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Nov. 7th, 2021
No. 11-6471.

#### Donald Lee Jackson, Petitioner v. J. Helton, et al.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 767,

181 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8637.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 228.
No. 11-5526.

#### Christopher Darnell Stratton, Petitioner v. Texas (five judgments).

565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 324,

181 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6143,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,067
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          352,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,320
<OTHER-SE>                                    (331,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,261
<SALES>                                            442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (301,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (301,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (301,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)


</TABLE>
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141761) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 15, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
** **

**Exhibit4.3**

** **

**DESCRIPTIONOF SECURITIES**

 

*Thefollowing description of certain terms of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc. (“AgeX”) common stock is a summary and is qualifiedin its entirety by reference to AgeX’s certificate of incorporation and bylaw and by the Delaware General Corporation Law.*

 

**CommonStock**

 

TheAgeX Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001per share. Each holder of record of common stock is entitled to one vote for each outstanding share owned, on every matter properlysubmitted to the stockholders for their vote, including election or removal of directors elected by AgeX stockholders generally.The holders of AgeX common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

 

Subjectto the dividend rights of holders of any of the preferred stock that may be issued from time to time, holders of common stockare entitled to any dividend declared by the AgeX Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.

 

Subjectto the prior payment of the liquidation preference to holders of any preferred stock that may be issued from time to time, holdersof common stock are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis all remaining assets available for distribution to the holders ofcommon stock in the event of the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of AgeX’s operations.

 

Holdersof AgeX common stock do not have preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. There will be no redemption or sinkingfund provisions applicable to the common stock. The rights, powers, preferences and privileges of holders of our common stockwill be subject to those of the holders of any shares of our preferred stock we may authorize and issue in the future.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 6/8/2012

Form REP-702

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Sample Number: 122430-001 Date Collected: 05/30/2012 08:00 Date Received: 5/30/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 279 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/06/2012 12:08 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122430-002 Date Collected: 05/30/2012 08:00 Date Received: 5/30/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 14.7 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/06/2012 12:13 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122430-003 Date Collected: 05/30/2012 08:00 Date Received: 5/30/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 0.7 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/06/2012 12:18 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122430 Page 1 of 1
No. 11-7285.

#### In re David Cruz, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 835,

181 L. Ed. 2d 542,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8673.

December 5, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Letter extending the Management Agreement Chesapeake Capital Corporation



 Exhibit 10.1(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Chesapeake Capital Corporation 

17th Floor 
 Richmond Federal Reserve Building

 701 E Byrd Street 
 Richmond, Va
23219 
 Attention: Mr. John M. Hoade 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals  

 Dear
Mr. Hoade: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Tidewater Futures Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	 CHESAPEAKE CAPITAL CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Richard S. Rusin

		 	Print Name:	 	Richard S. Rusin
		 		 	Chief Operating Officer
		
	JM/sr
No. 11-6801.

#### Charles Mason, Petitioner v. Salvador A. Godinez, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1068, 132 S. Ct. 781,

181 L. Ed. 2d 500,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8628,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 405 Ill. App. 3d 1218, 375 Ill. Dec. 707, 997 N.E.2d 1018.
No. 11-5859.

#### Linda N. Ashiegbu, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6453.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 770.
0 1 2 3 4 5

KEY TO STAGES:

TTI COMPARATOR Stage 0 is the initial condition when
the labels are applied.

Model 80 Stages 1 and 2 are intermediate

INSTRUCTIONS Select stages where the center is still
the /owest number from the lighter than the reference ring,

PRINCIPLE: The active center OTMparator that the sample F
of the TTI darkens with time and center matches or exceeds in Stage 3 is when the center matches

. darkness. Record results on OF exceeds the reference ring in
temperature, darkening more the appropriateinspection darkness.

Hapely'as the epee report. Stage 4 and 5 require an inspection

increases. Time and temperature to determine the serviceability of the
affect the quality of the ration. rations.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EARL E. HENRY, P.E., )

 )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1866

)

FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL )

ENGINEERS, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

Appeal from the Florida Board of 

Professional 

Engineers.

Earl E. Henry, pro se. 

John J. Rimes of Florida Engineers 

Management Corporation, Tallahassee,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.