alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at June 30, 2007, and the results of the Companys operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007.
 August 9, 2007
    /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZENBruce R. KnooihuizenExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
No. 11-7065.

#### Joseph J. Campbell, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1072, 132 S. Ct. 792,

181 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8450.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 657.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20334]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Fleet Management Division; Cancellation of Standard Forms

AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the General Services Administration's 
intent to cancel the following Standard forms:
    SF 149, U.S. Government National Credit Card, and SF 149A, U.S. 
Government Fleet Credit Card.
    Both of these forms were replaced with a bank credit card.

DATES: Effective July 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. William Webster, Environmental and Legislation Branch (703) 305-
6276. This contact is for information on the new fleet services credit 
card only.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-20334 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at June 30, 2005, and the results of the Companys operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005.
 August 12, 2005
    
    /S/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. Dussek
Chief Executive Officer and
principal executive officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3042 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3042

 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a 
 study on the security impact of sexually harassing behavior in United 
                 States nuclear weapons complex sites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2019

 Ms. Haaland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a 
 study on the security impact of sexually harassing behavior in United 
                 States nuclear weapons complex sites.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON SECURITY IMPACT OF SEXUALLY HARASSING 
              BEHAVIOR.

    (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct a study on sexually harassing behavior and its impact on 
security in United States nuclear weapons complex sites.
    (b) Elements.--The study under subsection (a) shall include--
            (1) identification of the organizational structure failures 
        that led to the sexual assault incident at the Nevada National 
        Security Site;
            (2) the number of reported incidents of sexual harassment 
        or assault within the nuclear weapons complex of the United 
        States over the five years preceding the study, including 
        incidents among contracted guard forces and reporting trends 
        during that period;
            (3) a description of how the National Nuclear Security 
        Administration's security oversight model and management 
        mechanisms integrate sexual harassment prevention into the 
        Administration's promotion of security culture; and
            (4) recommendations for further steps the National Nuclear 
        Security Administration should take to prevent sexually 
        harassing behavior within the nuclear weapons complex's guard 
        force.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20853]



[[Page 41815]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-686-000]


Williams Gas Pipeline Central, Inc.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 23, 1998, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc., (Applicant), One Williams Center, P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 
74101-0330, filed in Docket No. CP98-686-000 a request pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, and 157.216) for approval to abandon 
by reclaim facilities installed to receive transportation gas from TEC 
Pipeline, L.L.C., (TEC) located in Nowata County, under Applicant's 
blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-479-000, pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth 
in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Applicant asserts that the metering facilities for which it now 
seeks abandonment authorization are owned by TEC and that by letter 
dated March 19, 1998, TEC has agreed to the proposed abandonment. 
Applicant states that the estimated cost to abandon these facilities is 
$272.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20853 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment.

NO. 07-04-0027-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

APRIL 8, 2004

______________________________

GERALD BARROW, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 29,237-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Gerald Barrow, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a purported notice of

appeal on January 22, 2004, seeking review of his conviction for delivery of a controlled
2Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus with

the clerk of the court in which the conviction was obtained and be returnable to the Court

of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

Ann. art 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

2

substance. He asserts he was convicted in 1989 or 1990. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction.

A defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within the

deadlines provided in Rule 26.2(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The

rules provide for a 15 day extension in which to file the notice if a motion for extension of

time in compliance with Rule 10.5(b)(2) is filed in this Court. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3(b). The

Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no action other

than to dismiss the appeal if an appeal is not timely perfected. See Slaton v. State, 981

S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998). Appellant’s purported notice of appeal by which he

challenges a 15 year old conviction is untimely and does not invoke our jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1181

In Re: MARY E. SIMMONS, Debtor.
MARY E. SIMMONS, Appellant, versus ELLEN W. COSBY, Trustee, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-3562-H, BK-99-65737-SD) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary E. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Ellen W. Cosby, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mary E. Simmons appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing her bankruptcy proceeding for failing to comply with the requirements of Chapter 13. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Cosby , Nos. CA-00-3562-H; BK-99-65737-SD (D. Md. Jan. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at June 30, 2005, and the results of the Companys operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005.
 August 12, 2005
    
    /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZENBruce R. Knooihuizen
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and principal financial officer
No. 11-5946.

#### Herschel Blackmon, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 814,

181 L. Ed. 2d 528,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8807.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 63 So. 3d 748.
No. 11-5062.

#### Colin D. Bortz, Petitioner v. Kenneth R. Cameron, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Cresson, et al.

565 U.S. 1088, 132 S. Ct. 838,

181 L. Ed. 2d 543,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8770.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 264, 181 L. Ed. 2d 155, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5669.
Foothill Transit 

Going Good Places 

April 24, 2015 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Support for Access Services' Petition for Rulemaking 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

On behalf of Foothill Transit, we are writing in support of Access Services' Petition for Rulemaking to 

the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) that asks for an amendment to the DOT's 

regulations concerning the calculation of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit fares. We 

would also strongly support legislation that would accomplish the same purpose as the Petition. 

Access provides the ADA complementary paratransit service on behalf of local and municipal fixed 

route operators in Los Angeles County. As such, Foothill Transit is a voting member of Access, and 

therefore interested in ensuring the service meets the needs of the customers in our region. 

Access uses a simple, two-tier coordinated fare that has been in existence for nearly twenty years. It 

was implemented after consultation with the disability community and a number of. advocacy. groups 

because it is fair and easy for Access customers to understand. We are very concerned that any 

new fare system will be significantly more complex and lead to confusion amongst Access clients. 

We are also concerned that a new fare system could lead to higher fares for certain clients, many of 

whom live on fixed-incomes. These concerns are also shared by Los Angeles County's Independent 

Living Centers, Regional Centers and other organizations that serve people with disabilities. 

The Americans with Disabilities Act has been a blessing for people with disabilities in America. 

However, in this instance, we would urge the Department to amend the regulations to allow Access' 

coordinated fare to continue as it has for the last two decades. 

Thank you for your· attention 'to this matter. If you have any questions, we can be reached at (626) 

931 7300. 

Doran J. arn 

Executive Director · 

... J)~ rv- . ,, 

David .Reyno 

Director of Government Relations 

100 s vmcenl Ave ,' Su1te 200 • West Covma, CA 91790 W footh1lltransit.org P 626.967.3147 F 626 9151143 

MEMBER CITIES · Arcadia Azusa. Baldwin Park. Bra.dbury. Claremont. Covina, Diamond Bar. D.uarte. El Monte. Glendora. 

Industry, l;windale. La P.uente. La Verne. Monrovia. Pasaden~. Pomona. San D1mas. South El Monte. Temple City. Walnut. 

¥i\iivina g-as Angeles County ,A PUBLIC AGENCY 'r1 lf!lii I I Ill! . . . 
J • • 

Foothill Transit 

Going Good Places 

100 South Vmcent Avenue. Suite 200 

West Cov1na. California 91790 

s 10-150504-022 

---- ~"i--¢>~~ 

•

··e Z 

~::: I 

1.~- ~ ;:..;:$-AIIIIIIIIW_ ~-111toi Y IWWIS 

:;) ~ $048° • 02 1M 0 " • ono4270426 APR 28 2015 

: MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 91790
## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION, INC. Complainant
vs. AIR CHARTER, INC. Respondent 

# RECEIVED WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## NOV

## 202012 

## HEARINGDOCKET
FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SS0008 DMS NO. FAA-2009-0100 Hon. Isaac D. Benkin

OPPOSITION TO RECONSIDERATION COMES NOW Respondent and by its undersigned attorney pleads and prays as follows: L Complainant asks that the DecisionandOrder servedinthis matter on October 11, 2012 be modified to hold precisely contrary to what was found tobe the evidence adjudgedbythe trier of fact. In essence, what Complainant is requesting is the facts presented to the Administrative Law Judge seized of the matter and the documents reviewed by him be substitutedby Complainant's version thereof. 2. Respondent's violation was historically remote and had no relation whatsoever to the facts which formed the basis for the complaint at caption. TheAdministrative Law Judge made no mention of it for the obvious reason that he considered it irrelevant, in spite ofbeingaskedtotake notice of it. Again, Complainant would have itsjudgment substitute that of the trier of fact and ultimatearbiter of the applicable law. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Respondent very respectfully requests that Complainant's petition to reconsider be denied outright. In Guaynabo, P.R., this 14th day of November, 2012. I certifythatbefore filing the above, a copyhereofwas this day mailed with postage fully prepaid thereon to Gerald A. Ellis, Esq., as well as to the Hearing Docket Clerk, to their addresses of record.

GABRIEL I. PENAGARICANO 120608 PMB 239 405 Ave. Esmeralda, Ste. 102 Guaynabo, P.R. 00969 287-9024, Fax. 731-0679 gipsl934@hotmail.corn
No. 11-6793.

#### Isaac Marion, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 567,

181 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7980.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 847.
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0336 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. GINA DELIGHT KRUEGER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

o f time to and including April 25 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve her opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2022

03/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0336
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT July 18, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature UCP NYCO RIPSTOP

Shade Number URBAN GREY 501 Piece/Roll Number 3729

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3729 URBAN GREY 

501

51.22 -0.51 6.41

Tolerance

1 FULL LIMIT

-1.63 -0.85 -0.60 1.53

2

THIN 

GREEN 

LIMIT 2.98 -0.18 0.22 1.38

3 YELLOW 

LIMIT 0.69 0.15 -0.20 0.43

4 ORANGE 

LIMIT 2.01 0.08 -0.78 1.25

5

BLUE LIMIT 1.46 -0.41 -0.79 1.19

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for 
OMB review and approval of the information collection system described 
below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Procedures and Monitoring Bank Secrecy Act Compliance.
    OMB Number: 3064-0087.
    Annual Burden: Estimated annual number of respondents:--8,400; 
Estimated time per response--.5 hours; Average annual burden hours--
4,200 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: September 30, 1998.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before August 27, 1998 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 12 CFR 326 requires all insured nonmember 
banks to establish and maintain procedures designed to assure and 
monitor their compliance with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act 
(31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.) and the implementing regulations promulgated 
thereunder by the Department of Treasury at 31 CFR 103.

    Dated: July 22, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20058 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
This PDF Has Moved

Please download the PDF file at

https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/resources/posters-andfactsheets.html
No. 11-5895.

#### Curtis Edward Cook, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 459,

181 L. Ed. 2d 299,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7561.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, denied.
No. 11M50.

#### C. D., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1091, 132 S. Ct. 864,

181 L. Ed. 2d 546,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8933.

December 12, 2011.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record denied.