40100 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 1998 / Notices

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS

subheading is provided for convenience

and customs purposes, our written

description of the scope is dispositive.

Final Results of Review; Partial

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order

The affirmative statement of no

interest by the petitioner in PVA from

Japan for use in the manufacture of an

excipient or as an excipient in the

manufacture of film coating systems

which are components of a drug or

dietary supplement, constitutes changed

circumstances sufficient to warrant

partial revocation of this order.

Therefore, the Department is partially

revoking the order on PVA from Japan

for use in the manner prescribed above,

in accordance with sections 751 (b) and

(d) and 782(h) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.222(g)(i). This partial revocation

applies to all entries of the subject

merchandise entered or withdrawn from

the warehouse for consumption on or

after May 1, 1998.

The Department will instruct the

Customs Service (‘‘Customs’’) to

proceed with liquidation, without

regard to antidumping duties, of all

unliquidated entries of PVA from Japan

for use in the manufacture of an

excipient or as an excipient in the

manufacture of film coating systems

which are components of a drug or

dietary supplement entered, or

withdrawn from the warehouse, for

consumption on or after May 1, 1998.

The Department will further instruct

Customs to refund with interest any

estimated duties collected with respect

to unliquidated entries of PVA from

Japan for use in the manner prescribed

above, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

this changed circumstances review, in

accordance with Section 778 of the Act.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to parties subject to

administrative protection orders (APOs)

of their responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1997). Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation.

This changed circumstances review,

partial revocation of the antidumping

duty order, and notice are in accordance

with sections 751 (b) and (d) and 782(h)

of the Act and sections 351.216,

351.221(c)(3), and 351.222(g) of the

Department’s regulations.

Dated: July 20, 1998.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 98–20012 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Cornell University; Notice of Decision

on Application for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 AM and 5:00 PM in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC.

Docket Number: 98–028. Applicant:

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–

1501. Instrument: Electron Microprobe,

Model JXA–8900R. Manufacturer:

Narishige Scientific, Japan. Intended

Use: See notice at 63 FR 31737, June 10,

1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides characterization of elemental

composition and structure in surfaces

with resolution down to 1 μm. The

National Institute of Standards and

Technology advised July 26, 1996 that

(1) this capability is pertinent to the

applicant’s intended purpose and (2) it

knows of no domestic instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument for the

applicant’s intended use (comparable

case).

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19904 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Rutgers-The State University of New

Jersey; Notice of Decision on

Application for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instrument

This is a decision pursuant to Section

6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and

Cultural Materials Importation Act of

1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15

CFR part 301). Related records can be

viewed between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM

in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

Decision: Denied. Applicant has failed

to establish that domestic instruments of

equivalent scientific value to the foreign

instrument for the intended purposes

are not available.

Reasons: Section 301.5(e)(4) of the

regulations requires the denial of

applications that have been denied

without prejudice to resubmission if

they are not resubmitted within the

specified time period. This is the case

for the following docket.

Docket Number: 97–101. Applicant:

Rutgers-The State University of New

Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08855.

Instrument: Automated Thermal

Conductivity and Specific Heat System,

Model EMT 101. Manufacturer: Termis

Ltd., C.I.S. Date of Denial Without

Prejudice to Resubmission: April 28,

1998.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–20014 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of California, Berkeley;

Notice of Decision on Application for

Duty-Free Entry of Scientific

Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 98–025. Applicant:

University of California, Berkeley,

Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument:

Electron Detector. Manufacturer:

Gammadata/Scienta AB, Sweden.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 1998 / Notices 40101

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR

27562, May 19, 1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides angular resolution of 0.02

degree with significant throughput. The

Brookhaven National Laboratory

advised July 2, 1998 that (1) this

capability is pertinent to the applicant’s

intended purpose and (2) it knows of no

domestic instrument or apparatus of

equivalent scientific value to the foreign

instrument for the applicant’s intended

use.

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19902 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of California, Davis; Notice

of Decision on Application for DutyFree Entry of Scientific Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC.

Docket Number: 98–026. Applicant:

University of California, Davis, Davis,

CA 95616. Instrument: Optical Imaging

System, Model ORA 2001.

Manufacturer: Optical Imaging, United

Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 63

FR 31737, June 10, 1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides ability to perform optical

imaging to map brain activity in

laboratory animals. The National

Institutes of Health advises in its

memorandum dated June 8, 1998 that

(1) this capability is pertinent to the

applicant’s intended purpose and (2) it

knows of no domestic instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument for the

applicant’s intended use.

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19903 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of California, San Diego;

Notice of Decision on Application for

Duty-Free Entry of Scientific

Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC.

Docket Number: 98–029. Applicant:

University of California, San Diego, San

Diego, CA 92121. Instrument: Wave

Measurement Equipment. Manufacturer:

Datawell bv, The Netherlands. Intended

Use: See notice at 63 FR 31737, June 10,

1998.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as it is

intended to be used, is being

manufactured in the United States.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides: (1) more reliable wave

direction estimates at frequencies under

1.0 Hz and over 3.0 Hz with less

variability within the range, and (2)

better wave spread estimates than

comparable domestic equipment. Two

domestic manufacturers of similar

equipment advised April 23, 1997 that

(1) these capabilities are pertinent to the

applicant’s intended purpose and (2)

they know of no domestic instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument for the

applicant’s intended use (comparable

case).

We know of no other instrument or

apparatus of equivalent scientific value

to the foreign instrument which is being

manufactured in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–19905 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and

Technology

Feedback Forms for WebMetrics

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Department of

Commerce, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burden, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on

proposed and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506

(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before September 25,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Direct written comment to

Linda Engelmeier, Departmental Forms

Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the information collection

instrument(s) and instructions should

be directed to Sharon Laskowski,

National Institute of Standards and

Technology (NIST), Building 225, Room

A216, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

This submission under the Paperwork

Reduction Act represents a request for a

new collection by NIST. The NIST

WebMetrics Tool Suite contains rapid,

remote, and automated tools to help in

producing usable web sites. The NIST

WebMetrics Tool Suite consists of three

tools: the Static Analyzer Tool

(WebSAT), the Category Analysis Tool

(WebCAT), and the Visual Instrumenter

Tool (WebVIP).

WebSAT checks the Hypertext

Markup Language (HTML) of a web page

against numerous usability guidelines.

The output from WebSAT consists of

identification of potential usability

problems which should be investigated

further through user testing.

WebCAT lets the usability engineer

quickly construct and conduct a simple

category analysis across the web.

WebVIP lets the usability engineer

rapidly instrument a web site for local

or remote testing by employing visual

instrumenting as well as automated

techniques.

Users of the NIST WebMetrics tools

may provide NIST with comments on