alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132751 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132751 

 COA: 261233 
 Kent CC: 04-005331-FH 

KEVIN JOHN RIDEOUT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 26, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE, in part, the decision of the Court of 

Appeals. We do not disturb the Court of Appeals ruling that a new trial is warranted 

because the jury was not adequately instructed on the issues of proximate and intervening 

cause. But the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that the defendant's wrongful 

conduct could not be the proximate cause of the decedent's death. A reasonable jury 

could find that the actions of the decedent were foreseeable based on an objective 

standard of reasonableness. People v Schaefer, 473 Mich 418, 437-438 (2005), overruled 

in part by, explained by, People v Derror, 475 Mich 316 (2006). Accordingly, the 

prosecutor may retry the defendant on the charge of operating while intoxicated or 

operating while visibly impaired causing death. 

We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address the defendant's 

remaining issue concerning the admissibility of expert testimony, which may arise again 

if defendant is retried on the same charge. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d0321 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 28, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 11-5296.

#### Taliv Ali, Petitioner v. Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York Department of Correctional Services, et al.

565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 293,

181 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5464.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT PAUL BROWN, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL SCOTT BROWN,

Appellee.

No. 4D12-2446

[July 15, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Martin Colin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502009CP004124XXXXSB.

Craig A. Boudreau, Wellington, for appellant.

Nancy Guffey and Peter M. Feaman of Peter M. Feaman, P.A., Boynton 

Beach, for appellee.

GERBER, J.

An estate beneficiary appeals from the circuit court’s final order 

directing the personal representative to divide and distribute “the 

[decedent’s] Georgia real estate and Florida real estate and other 

miscellaneous inventory assets of the Estate” amongst several estate 

beneficiaries. The appellant primarily argues that the circuit court lacked 

jurisdiction to direct the personal representative to distribute the 

decedent’s Georgia real estate.

We agree and reverse that portion of the order on appeal. See Polkowski 

v. Polkowski, 854 So. 2d 286, 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Like lines in the 

sand, state boundaries determine a court’s jurisdiction over real property,”

and thus the court lacked in rem jurisdiction to order the partition and 

sale of foreign property); Pawlik v. Pawlik, 545 So. 2d 506, 507 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 1989) (“In no event could the [circuit] court effect a partition of lands 

outside this state.”) (citation omitted); In re Roberg’s Estate, 396 So. 2d 

235, 235-36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (“When a testator executes a will devising 

lands in two or more states, the courts in each state construe it as to the 

lands located therein as if devised by separate wills.”) (citations omitted).
2

To partition property from outside this state, the personal 

representative needs to open an ancillary action in Georgia. See § 64.022, 

Fla. Stat. (2012) (a suit for partition “shall be brought in any county where 

the lands or any part thereof lie which are the subject matter of the 

action.”).

In all other respects, we affirm the order on appeal without further 

discussion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings 

consistent with this opinion.

STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40911-40912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20492]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the

[[Page 40912]]

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 27, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. PHS Bancorp, M.H.C., Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania; to acquire 55 
percent of the voting shares of PHS Bancorp, Inc., Beaver Falls, 
Pennsylvania, and thereby indirectly acquire Peoples Home Savings Bank, 
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania.
    In connection with this application, PHS Bancorp, Inc., Beaver 
Falls, Pennsylvania; has applied to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Peoples Home Savings 
Bank, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. First Belmond Bancorporation, Belmond, Iowa; to acquire at least 
58.57 percent of the voting shares of Community Bank of Oelwein (in 
organization), Oelwein, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 28, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-20492 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 11-5304.

#### Elena Sturdza, Petitioner v. United Arab Emirates, et al.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 517,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8425.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 295, 181 L. Ed. 2d 178, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5391.
No. 10-10817.

#### Steve Alan Mahoney, Petitioner v. Steve Hammond, et al.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 868,

181 L. Ed. 2d 565,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8894.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 176, 181 L. Ed. 2d 87, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6393.
# QSLMQSLDClass3ThreadedFasteners
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19380]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (98-097)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aeronautics and Space Transportation 
Technology Advisory Committee (ASTTAC); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, 
Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology Advisory Committee.

DATES: Wednesday, August 12, 1998, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; and 
Thursday, August 13, 1998, 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 7H46, 
300 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary-Ellen McGrath, Office of 
Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology, National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546 (202/358-4729).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology Overview
--Subcommittee Reports
--Strategic Management Framework
--University Strategy Recommendations
--NASA's Aviation Environmental Compatibility Research

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-19380 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7501-01-P
No. 11-6079.

#### Corey Jermaine Parker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1063, 132 S. Ct. 762,

181 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8482.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 220.
No. 11-7262.

#### In re Stephen Blackburn, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 835,

181 L. Ed. 2d 542,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8693.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 1, 2013

h0424 

# Order

May 1, 2013

145921

COUNTY OF MASON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145921

COA: 301952

Mason CC: 10

- 000202

- CE

INDIAN SUMMER COOPERATIVE, INC.,

d/b/a MASON COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS

COOPERATIVE, INC., d/b/a MASON

COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS, INC., d/b/a

MASON COUNTY FRUIT PACKERS

CO

- OP, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________ ____________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Co urt.
If there were a 

vaccine against 

cancer, wouldn’t 

you get it for 

your kids?

Distributed by:

CS249946-B

HPV vaccine is cancer prevention. 

Talk to the doctor about 

vaccinating your 11–12 year old 

sons and daughters

against HPV.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3207 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 446
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3207

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             March 12, 2020

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                  Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT DYLAN ELCHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 446

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3207

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                  Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 12, 2020

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32.01








CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Charter Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.































By:
/s/Walter DavisName:
Walter DavisTitle:
President ofCeres Managed Futures LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
November 9, 2011
BankFinancial Corporation Form of Extension of Term of Employment Period



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FORM OF EXTENSION OF TERM 
 OF EMPLOYMENT PERIOD 

MEMORANDUM 
  

					
	To:	  	  
	  	
	From:	  	Patricia Smith Lawler,	  	
		  	EVP/Human Resources Division	  	
	Re:	  	Extension of Employment Period	  	
	Date:	  	April     , 2012	  	

 The Board of Directors of BankFinancial Corporation (the “Company”) and its Human Resources
Committee have completed their annual review of your Employment Agreement with the Company dated             , and have determined to offer to amend your Employment Agreement to
extend the term of the “Employment Period” as referenced in Section 2(a) of your Employment Agreement to             . 

If you are agreeable to amending your Employment Agreement to extend the term of the Employment Period as provided above, please sign and
date this document in the space indicated below and return it to me by no later than             . 
 If you do not sign and return this document to me by such date, the term of your Employment Period and the Anniversary Date applicable to your Employment Agreement will remain unchanged. 

 

					
	Name:	  	 	  	
	Signature:	  	 	  	
	Date:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4265-4266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1196-DR]


New York; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of New York, (FEMA-1196-DR), dated January 10, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 12, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of New York, is hereby amended to include Categories C through G under 
the Public

[[Page 4266]]

Assistance program in the following areas among those areas determined 
to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major 
disaster by the President in his declaration of January 10, 1998:

Lewis County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.
Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Jefferson, and St. Lawrence Counties for 
Categories C through G under the Public Assistance program (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and Categories A and B under 
the Public Assistance program).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-2071 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
No. 11-157.

#### Scott Beason, et al., Petitioners v. Robert Bentley, Governor of Alabama, et al.

565 U.S. 1110, 132 S. Ct. 1000,

181 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 219.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 106 So. 3d 926.
No. 11-7056.

#### Douglas Beckford, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 826,

181 L. Ed. 2d 535,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8766.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 79 Mass. App. 1124, 948 N.E.2d 917.
No. 10-1121.

#### Dianne Knox, et al., Petitioners v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000.

565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 570,

181 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8057.

November 7, 2011.

Further consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss as moot is deferred to the hearing of the case on the merits.
No. 11-6720.

#### Cedric Kenyotta Rowe, Petitioner v. Catherine S. Bauman, Warden.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 823,

181 L. Ed. 2d 532,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8798.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5232.

#### Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 809,

181 L. Ed. 2d 520,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8327.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 385, 181 L. Ed. 2d 242, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6511.
#### William W. Dewhurst, *Appellant,*v. The City of St. Augustine, Florida, a Body Politic and Corporate, and C. G. Oldfather, Acting as City Auditor of the City of St. Augustine, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed February 23, 1926.

Petition for rehearing denied March 25, 1926.

*315Wm, W. *Dewhurst,*for Appellant;

*E. Noble Calhoun,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— In a suit praying for the cancellation of tax sale certificates held by the city for unpaid city taxes, upon grounds of alleged illegality in the assessments upon which the tax certificates are predicated, the court on final hearing dismissed the bill of complaint and an appeal was taken by the complainant.

Even if the allegations of illegality of the tax sale certificates held by the city may be regarded as duly sustained by the law and the evidence, yet it is apaprent that the complainant, appellant here, has not paid the taxes that may be legally due upon the property covered by the alleged invalid certificates, and as the complainant has not offered to do, but should do equity before he can invoke the aid of equity for the relief he seeks, it is considered, ordered and decreed that the decree herein be reversed *pro forma*and the cause remanded with dirctions to permit the parties by stipulation or other proper procedure to determine the amount of taxes that could legally have been assessed against the property and have not been paid, and that upon proof of the payment of such taxes the proper certificates shall be ordered cancelled; and if the taxes are not paid the bill of complaint shall be dismissed. The costs of this appeal will be taxed equally against the appellant and appellee city.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J. Concur.

Brown, C. J. and Ellis, J. Concur in the opinion.
No. 11-5849.

#### Corey Louis Hines, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 352,

181 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6991.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 975.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1231-DR]


New Hampshire; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1231-DR), dated July 2, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 2, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective July 2, 1998.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Laurence W. Zensinger,
Division Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-19826 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P