alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2016-022]


City of Tacoma; Notice of Availability of Final Environmental 
Assessment

July 27, 1998.
    A final environmental assessment (EA) is available for public 
review. The final EZ analyzes the environmental impacts of approving a 
settlement agreement among the City of Tacoma, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (the parties) 
for the Cowlitz River Project No. 2016-022. The City of Tacoma is the 
project's licensee and the project is located on the Cowlitz River at 
river miles 52 and 65, near the town of Mossyrock, Washington.
    The settlement agreement among the parties creates a 14,000 acre 
wildlife mitigation area to be managed by the Washington Department of 
Fish and Wildlife. All 14,000 acres will be included in the project 
boundary and managed according to a wildlife management plan once 
finalized. The final EA finds that creating the new wildlife mitigation 
area would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. The final EA was 
written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission. Copies of the final EA can be obtained by 
calling the Commission's Public Reference room at (202) 208-1371.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20479 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5252.

#### Antonio Green, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 287,

181 L. Ed. 2d 172,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5558.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
FUNDING YOUR ORDER USING A DD FORM 448 

Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) For a 

HEPP Purchase 

NOTE: All MIPRs must be Category I Reimbursable 

Block 1 - List the number of pages in the MIPR.

Block 2 – N/A 

Block 3 - List the "Control/Tracking Number" used during your initial RFQ request. PLEASE 

CONTINUE TO REFERENCE THIS NUMBER ON ALL FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE.

Block 4 - List the date of preparation. 

Block 5 - List the MIPR number (No dashes). 

Block 6 - Choose from "Basic" or Amendment number (if not initial submittal)

Block 7 – (not editable) the following is listed: 

DLA Troop Support - HEPP

Bldg. 3 

700 Robbins Ave.

Philadelphia, PA 19111-5092 

POC Phone numbers: 215-737-8206 or 215-737-8253

Block 8 - List your activity's address with DoDAAC, point of contact, phone and fax number. 

Block 9 – (a) List the item number. 

(b) List the description of items or an identifier such as “HEPP Program”.

 Please also include the DODAAC that will be used to BILL the LOA on the MIPR and the 

SHIP to DODAAC, with ship to address and point of contact/telephone # if different from block 8; and 

any other special instructions you may have. 

* Please include the "Funds Expiration Date".

*Don't forget to include the HEPP cost recovery fee of +2% (of the vendors quote) in your total*

 Note: All issuers of MIPRS must put the following statement on the MIPR: 

“This order meets all terms, conditions, and restrictions dictated by the funding source”. 

(c) Thru (f) are self explanatory.

Block 11 - List the total amount funded by your activity (vendor's quote + 2% fee).

Block 12 – Generally not applicable

Block 13 - List the billing address and billing DoDAAC.

Block 14 - List the appropriation accounting data used to fund the purchase. The same accounting 

line may be used for equipment and cost recovery. NOTE: Do not forward a MILSTRIP requisition 

with a MIPR requisition. Forward the MIPR only or the MILSTRIP only, but not both.

Blocks 15 thru 17 - Self explanatory.

**FUNDED MIPRs: As a courtesy, please return a copy of the quote your received from the DLA 

buyer with your funded MIPR. 

^^ALL MIPRS AND CORRESPONDENCE SHALL BE SENT TO HEPP@DLA.MIL MAILBOX^^
Navy Captain Paul M. Bland (RET) 

is being inducted into the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Hall of Fame this thirtieth day of 

November for his outstanding mission support from 1996 through 1999. Captain Bland 

distinguished himself through his exceptional service as Commander, Subsistence Field Activities, 

and Director of Subsistence. During this period, the outstanding leadership and ceaseless efforts of 

Captain Bland resulted in major contributions to the national security of the United States. Under 

his expert guidance and leadership, the Department of Defense food service mission reached levels 

of support never before envisioned. Guiding an organization of more than 585 personnel with 

annual sales in excess of $1.2 billion, he planned and directed the complete transformation of the 

worldwide DoD wholesale food distribution system from a depot-based system to a commercialbased Prime Vendor system. Savings in inventory, storage and distribution costs at the wholesale 

and retail levels exceeded $300 million. Not only in food service, but re-engineering efforts in 

produce and operational rations completely transformed logistics support to the warfighter. 

Additionally, under his leadership the DLA Troop Support regions in Europe and the Pacific evolved 

from a subsistence focus into multi-commodity managers. Through his distinctive 

accomplishments, he culminated a distinguished career in the service of his country and reflects 

great credit upon himself, the United States Navy, and the Department of Defense. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/pbland.htm 1/20/2016
Amendment 2 to Employment Agreement - Sean M. Stack



 Exhibit 10.5.2 
 Amendment 2 of Employment Agreement 
 Mr. Sean M. Stack (the
“Executive”) and Aleris International, Inc. (the “Company”) and for certain purposes Aleris Corporation (the “Parent”) formerly Aleris Holding Company entered into an agreement dated June 1, 2010 as amended by a
letter dated April 5, 2011. 
 The Executive, Company and Parent desire to amend the Agreement effective immediately prior to
the effectiveness of an initial public offering of Parent pursuant to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2011, as amended, as follows: 

1. Clause (ii) of the first sentence of Section 3 is amended by replacing the words “six (6) months” with “thirty (30)
days”. 
 2. The last sentences of Sections 5(a)(ii) and (d) shall be amended to add at the end thereof the following:

 ;provided, further, however, notwithstanding the foregoing, if termination of employment is in anticipation of or within
twelve (12) months following a Change of Control (as defined in the Aleris Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan), the Severance Payment will be paid in a cash lump sum within thirty (30) days following the Date of Termination, to the extent
permissible under the rules regarding a “short term deferral” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) of the Code and “separation pay plans” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section
1.409A-1(b)(9) of the Code or otherwise not subject Executive to taxes under Section 409A of the Code. For purposes of the foregoing, a termination of employment will be deemed to be “in anticipation of” a Change of Control if such
termination is for the principal purpose of avoiding or evading the Company’s or Parent’s compensation obligations that would arise upon a termination following a Change of Control.” 

3. Section 5(d) is amended by replacing the words “twelve (12)” with “eighteen (18)” in the two places it appears and
to add after “(ii)” the following “the product of (x) one and one-half times (y)”. 
 4. Except as expressly
amended by this letter agreement, the Agreement shall otherwise continue in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above. 
  

	
	Executive
	
	  
	Sean M. Stack
	
	Aleris International, Inc.
	
	  

	By: Christopher R. Clegg
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	
	Aleris Corporation
	
	  

	By: Christopher R. Clegg
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary



  
 2
Exhibit 35.14  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of November 1, 2016 by and among Credit Suisse Commercial
Mortgage Securities Corp. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to CSAIL 2016-C7 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2016-C7 (CSAIL 2016-C7) The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,
2018 to December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:

/s/ Adam Singer

Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
No. 11-6450.

#### Andrew Mark Lamar, Petitioner v. Tom Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 765,

181 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8582.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 718.
No. 10-11157.

#### John McDowell, Petitioner v. Jerome W. Walsh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

565 U.S. 870, 132 S. Ct. 222,

181 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6577,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 149.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40936-40937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,569]


Georgia Apparel, Inc., New York, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on May 26, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on

[[Page 40937]]

behalf of workers at Georgia Apparel, Incorporated, New York, New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of July, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-20496 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in a grantee

immunization information system -- United States, six cities§, and eight Territories†, 2009

§ Chicago, IL (34%-66%);

District of Columbia (95%–100%);

Houston, TX (34%–66%); 

New York City, NY (95%–100%); 

Philadelphia, PA (95%–100%); 

San Antonio, TX (67%–94%).

† American Samoa (67%-94%);

Marshall Islands (67%-94%);

Federated States of Micronesia (67% -94%);

Guam (34%-66%);

N. Mariana Islands (95%-100%);

Palau (in Transition);

Puerto Rico (67%-94%);

Virgin Islands (No Report).

No Report

In Transition*

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%

National Coverage: 77% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2009 IISAR

* In transition is defined as a grantee implementing a new 

IIS product.
July 11, 2016

SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE 

For Supervisors and Key Personnel

What is sexual assault?

Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the 

recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, 

forcible sodomy, fondling or groping, and attempted rape. This is not all inclusive and said actions may not 

meet elements of the local criminal statute. Support and advocacy will be provided for these offenses. 

 Contact the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC) 24/7 

DLA HQs SAPR 703-767-5141 or 703-767-2625

 Notify DLA OIG. If someone discloses details of a DLA related sexual assault to you 

in your official capacity. OIG will secure the scene and contact appropriate Military 

Criminal Investigative Agency to investigate.

 Take appropriate steps to initiate the DLA CCIR (Supervisor Responsibility)

 Take Care of the Victim’s Needs

 Ensure the SARC speaks with the victim (allow privacy to protect confidentiality)

 Do not question the victim

 Remind the victim not to eat, drink, use the restroom or do anything that may disrupt 

evidence collection

 Please remember the medical well-being and safety of the victim are priority. A 

victim can get medical treatment and still maintain their confidential options.

 Remember the following:

 No two people respond to or cope with sexual assault in the same way. How a person 

presents to you is not an indication of whether or not a sexual assault has occurred.

 Be aware of your own moral/personal biases and keep them in check. Comments 

related to victim’s style of dress, drinking activities or personal choices are irrelevant 

and may severely impair the healing process.

 What you say/how you act may make the difference in whether or not the victim 

proceeds with the case and may have a significant impact on how the victim continues 

with recovery.

 Communication Guidelines for Dealing with Victims of Sexual Assault 

If you are approached by someone who falls under your direct line of supervision or your official capacity as 

DLA personnel and you believe they may disclose a sexual assault to you, it’s okay to stop them and make 

them aware of the options available to them. For example, you can say the following:

“Let me stop you for a moment. I want you to know I’m here for you and ready to listen if you need 

help, but I don’t want you to lose any options that may be available to you by disclosing too much 

information to me at this time. If you think you might like to speak with the Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinator before we continue this discussion, I can put you in touch with him/her immediately. Just 

know that if you disclose a sexual assault to me, I will have to report that assault to law enforcement.”
No. 11-6662.

#### Royce Demond Rice, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 994, 132 S. Ct. 539,

181 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7631.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 289.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0567 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARRETT MICHAEL O’HOWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 5, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 3 2022

06/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0567
No. 11-6108.

#### Robert Juarbe, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 512,

181 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7767.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 04-01 STANDARD 22.84 -1.18 -13.47

Tolerance

1 1 THIN GREEN 

LIMIT 22.87 -1.54 -14.06 0.03 -0.36 -0.59 0.57

2 2 RED LIMIT 23.33 -0.84 -13.55 0.49 0.34 -0.08 0.55

3 3 THIN YELLOWGREEN LIMIT 23.56 -2.17 -12.84 0.72 -0.99 0.63 1.40

4 4 VIOLET LIMIT 23.23 -0.93 -14.31 0.39 0.25 -0.84 0.76

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number BLUE 1632 Piece/Roll Number 04-01

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 14, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, PLAIN WEAVE, NYLON 

SUPPLEX PD-04-08

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF
*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.52. APPENDIX 3.52**

**ASSET STATUS**

## 

**AP3.56-**

AP3.52-1

APPENDIX 3.52
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-76697, 33-1805, 33-22289, 33-50248 and 33-74488) and the
registration statements on Form S-3 (Files Nos. 2-96502 and 33-14873 Amendment
No. 1) of our reports, dated August 8, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Quixote Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the years ended
June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Quixote Corporation.








/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
-------------------------------

Chicago, Illinois
September 26, 1997
CS322867-A | 03/1/21

U.S. Department of 

Health and Human Services 

Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention 

www.cdc.gov/COVID19

Recognizing and Responding to Anaphylaxis

How to recognize anaphylaxis

Healthcare personnel should consider anaphylaxis when patients present with generalized signs or symptoms such 

as hives, serious or life-threatening symptoms (e.g., hypotension, respiratory distress, or significant swelling of the 

tongue or lips), or symptoms that involve more than one body system.

Respiratory:

 sensation of

throat closing

 stridor (highpitched sound

while breathing)

 shortness of breath

 wheeze, cough

Gastrointestinal:

 nausea

 vomiting

 diarrhea

 abdominal pain

Cardiovascular:

 dizziness

 fainting

 tachycardia

(abnormally

fast heart rate)

 hypotension

(abnormally low

blood pressure)

Neurological: 

 agitation

 convulsions

 acute change in

mental status

 sense of impending

doom (a feeling that

something bad is

about to happen)

Skin/mucosal:

 generalized hives

 itching

 swelling of lips,

face, or throat

What to do if you suspect anaphylaxis

Assess airway, breathing, 

and circulation

Administer 

epinephrine

Call Emergency 

Medical Services (EMS)

Place in supine position

Detailed information can be found in the Interim Considerations: 

Preparing for the Potential Management of Anaphylaxis After COVID-19 Vaccination
Immunization Information Systems (IIS) Data Quality Blueprint

BLUEPRINT ENDPOINT

IISs have trusted data to: 

1. Assess national, state, and

local immunization coverage

2. Identify vulnerable populations

and pockets of need

3. Support responses to

emerging needs

The IIS Data Quality Blueprint is a guide to help 

immunization programs address and advance data 

quality within IISs. Its measures focus on improving 

IIS data throughout the lifespan.

The blueprint focuses on driving IIS data that are:

• AVAILABLE

• COMPLETE

• TIMELY

• VALID

Other enabling characteristics (i.e., ACCURATE, 

CONSISTENT, and UNIQUE) and functional 

processes (e.g., interoperability) are inherent to 

high quality IIS data and complement the blueprint 

data quality characteristics.

Sample activities for achieving high quality data and 

the associated recommended measures are found 

in the IPOM Sample Activities 2023 document.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40327-40328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [63 FR 39916, July 
24, 1998].

STATUS: Closed meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: July 24, 1998.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Additional items.


[[Page 40328]]


    The following items will be added to the closed meeting scheduled 
for Friday, July 31, 1998, at 10:00 a.m.:
    Settlement of injunctive action.
    Settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.
    Commissioner Hunt, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: July 24, 1998.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20238 Filed 7-24-98; 11:19 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
No. 11-80.

#### Gila River Indian Community, Petitioner v. G. Grant Lyon.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 498,

181 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7722.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 1059.
No. 10-10878.

#### Cory Cortes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 803,

181 L. Ed. 2d 514,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8375.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 184, 181 L. Ed. 2d 93, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6314.
No. 11-6843.

#### Shawn Rice, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 594,

181 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8123.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.