alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P130773.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0773 

Focus Ready Draft 8/19/2013

ENGINEER: Jay \ REC 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Use local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to 

maintain airborne levels below exposure limit requirements or guidelines. // 

Use safety glasses (with side shields). // No skin protection precautions 

other than clean body-covering clothing should be needed. // Chemical 

protective gloves should not be needed when handling this material. 

Consistent with general hygienic practice for any material, skin contact may 

be minimized.

Respirator: Respiratory protection should be worn when there is a potential 

to exceed the exposure limit requirements or guidelines. If there are no 

applicable exposure limit requirements or guidelines, wear respiratory 

protection when adverse effects, such as respiratory irritation or discomfort 

have been experienced, or where indicated by your risk assessment process. In 

dusty or misty atmospheres, use an approved particulate respirator.

Health Effects: Eye: Essentially nonirritating to eyes. Corneal injury in 

unlikely. // Skin: Essentially nonirritating to skin. Prolonged skin contact 

is unlikely to result in absorption of harmful amounts. // Inhalation: No 

adverse effects are anticipated from single exposure to dust. Dust may cause 

irritation to upper respiratory tract (nose and throat). // Ingestion: Low 

toxicity if swallowed. Small amounts swallowed incidentally as a result of 

normal handling operations are not likely to cause injury; however, 

swallowing larger amounts may cause injury. // Based on physical properties, 

not likely to be an aspiration hazard.

TLV/PEL:

None established. 

CRSS (08/08/2013):

Chemical Name: 4-Pyrimidinamine, 2,5-dimethoxyS-H20: 7.66 g/L @ 

VP: 1.6E-4 torr @ 

MW: 155.00 %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Neat: Solid Mfg: NK - Imported Proc/Form: NA End Use: Destroyed. Submitted 

Page 1
P130773.eng

data: solid; MP = 180-181 °C; average particle size: d10 = 57.2-88 μm, d50 = 

222.8-234.2 μm, d90 = 434.8-496 μm, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra are consistent 

with the structure provided. Literature data: MP = 180-181 °C. EPI estimated 

data (input MP = 181 °C): BP = 276 °C; VP = 0.000164 torr; WS = 7.658 g/L; 

log P = 0.08. ACD Labs estimated data (STN pprop): BP = 316 °C; VP = 4.16E-04 

torr; WS = 9 g/L; log P = 0.205.

Consumer Use: No 

SAT (concerns) (08/09/2013):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Ecotox: Analogs: . // Human Health: 

Migration to groundwater: negl - slow 

PBT rating: P1B1T2 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (No Testing desired) 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 7.00 ppb.), XB Testing 

(Testing desired) 



Page 2
P130773.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0773 

Page 3
P130773.eng

 

Page 4
P130773.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5
P130773.eng

Page 6
P130773.eng

Page 7
1

Velocity Caps as Preapproved Technology for Impingement Mortality Control

A velocity cap is a device that is placed over a vertical inlet at an offshore cooling water intake.  

This cover converts vertical flow into horizontal flow at the entrance into the intake.  The device

works on the premise that fish will avoid rapid changes in horizontal flow, thus reducing overall

impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms.

Historically, velocity caps have been shown to reduce impingement by 68 to 99 percent.  All

velocity caps include certain characteristics that are critical to the success of this technology:

1. Velocity cap(s) must be designed to ensure that fish are subjected to horizontal rather

than vertical flow from the intake structure.

2. Velocity cap intake flow should be at least 0.5 fps or greater to ensure that fish detect

the horizontal flow in time to escape impingement.

3. The velocity cap must be placed in an optimum location offshore and in the middle of

the water column to reduce impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms.

4. The determination of optimum location and flow characteristics are site‐specific and

should be approved by the permitting director.

There are more than a dozen velocity caps in operation at various facilities throughout the U.S.  

These structures provide intake water flow to nuclear, coal and natural gas‐fired facilities

located on the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, and the Great Lakes.

Several studies in California have concluded that velocity caps significantly reduce

impingement.  Studies at the Huntington Beach and El Segundo Generating Stations showed

overall reductions in entrapment (equated to impingement mortality losses) of 80 to 90

percent. Two additional studies at the Scattergood Generating Station included measurements

conducted pre‐ and post‐installation of velocity caps, as well as more recent flow reversal

studies (EPA 2011; LADWP 2007).  The results from the Scattergood study showed an overall

reduction of 83 percent.  The Ormond Beach Generating Station studies conducted

concurrently with the Huntington Beach studies demonstrated overall reductions in

entrapment of 61 percent during the night and 87 percent during the day.

In comparative studies of offshore velocity cap intakes as compared to onshore intake

structures, studies from 1992‐1998 and 2002‐2006 indicate that the Seabrook Nuclear

Generating Plant in New Hampshire, with offshore velocity caps, reduced impingement impacts

by 68 and 83 percent, respectively, as compared to the onshore intake structure of the Pilgrim

Plant located in Massachusetts.
2

Based on the successful history of operating velocity caps at several facilities, this technology

should be continued to be considered Best Technology Available for reducing impingement

mortality.  Future installations of velocity cap structures should be designed to meet the

general criteria described above.
No. 11-398.

#### Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Florida, et al.

565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 604,

181 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8094.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted. In addition to Question 1 presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the suit brought by respondents to challenge the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a).” A total of two hours is allotted for oral argument on Question 1. One hour is allotted for oral argument on the additional question.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1235.
<page>				  EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  August 16, 2004      /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               President,
                               Demeter Management Corporation,
                               general partner of the registrant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Charter Millburn L.P. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      24,070,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  487,301<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,146,176<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,146,176<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (1,329,194)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,630,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,959,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,959,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,959,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $358,786 and
interest receivable of $128,515.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $411,852.
<F3>Liabilities include accrued brokerage fees of $140,919, accrued
management fees of $40,263 and redemptions payable of $340,578.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(1,014,081), net
change in unrealized of $(1,332,675) and interest income of $1,017,562.
</FN>



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.45

 



 

May 28, 2014

Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
Equitec Specialists, LLC
3100 Dundee Road, Suite 703
Northbrook, IL 60062

Re: HPEV, Inc.

Gentlemen;

HPEV, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby offers Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd. and Equitec Specialists, LLC (together, the “Investor”) price protection on the 222,223 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Shares”) purchased in a private placement on or about February 5, 2014 by the Investor.

If the closing price of the Company’s stock on the earlier of the (i) day immediately prior to when the Investor is first able to sell the Shares under Rule 144 (August 5, 2014 shall be the “144 Date” for purposes of this letter agreement) or (ii) date when the registration statement covering the Shares is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is less than the closing price of the Company’s stock on the day immediately prior to the date that the Form S-1 registration statement covering the Lincoln Park Equity Line shares (no. 333-195569) filed by the Company is declared effective by the SEC, then the Company shall pay the Investor the amount of such difference. For example, if the closing stock price on August 4th is $2.00 and on the date the Lincoln Park Equity Line Form S-1 is declared effective  the closing stock price is $2.50, the Company shall pay the Investor $111,111.50 Such amount shall be paid by the Company within three (3) business days after the Investor notifies the Company of such amount due.

The Investor shall send the Company its calculation of the amount owed by the Company within five business days after the earlier of the effectiveness of the Registration Statement covering the Shares and the 144 Date. If no calculation is received by the Company or before such date, the rights of the Investor contained herein shall expire and be of no further force and effect.

	 
	
1








	





 

This letter of intent may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.  Except for the changes detailed in this agreement, all other terms agreed to between the Company and Investor will not change.  All documents and signatures required hereunder may be delivered or exchanged by facsimile or other electronic transmission.  This letter of intent shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.

          If the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding, please execute where indicated below and return to the undersigned, whereupon it shall become a legally binding and enforceable agreement between us.

HPEV, INC.

		By	/s/ Theodore Banzhaf	 
	 	 	Name: Theodore Banzhaf	 
	 	 	Title: President	 
	 	 	 	 


 

Accepted and Agreed to:

Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd.

By: Cranshire Capital Advisors, LLC

Its:  Investment Manager

/s/ Keith A. Goodman

Keith A. Goodman

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

Equitec Specialists, LLC

By: Cranshire Capital Advisors. LLC

Its:  Investment Manager

/s/ Keith A Goodman

Title: Authorized Signatory

	 
	
2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3095]


Commonwealth of Kentucky (and Contiguous Counties in West 
Virginia)

    Martin County and the contiguous Counties of Floyd, Johnson, 
Lawrence, and Pike in Kentucky, and Mingo and Wayne Counties in West 
Virginia constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by 
heavy rains and flash flooding that occurred on June 11, 1998. 
Applications for loans for physical damages as a result of this 
disaster may be filed until the close of business on August 24, 1998 
and for economic injury until the close of business on March 24, 1999 
at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. 
Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore 
Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 7.000%.
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.500%.
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000%.
    Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 4.000%.
    Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 7.125%.

For Economic Injury

    Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit 
Available Elsewhere: 4.000%.
    The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damages are 
309506 for Kentucky and 309606 for West Virginia. For economic injury 
the numbers are 990600 for Kentucky and 990700 for West Virginia.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 24, 1998.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-17706 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 55 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 57, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.82 CWT 0.965 $11.41

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9674 LB 3.5 $6.89

Class I Price $18.29

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.56 CWT 0.965 $10.19

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9755 LB 3.5 $6.91

Class I Price $17.10

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.19

(4) Price change per gallon $0.10

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.05

Price change per quart $0.03

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.10

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.05

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.03

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: June 6th, 2021
-----"HAMILTON, J. HA GOOD JR" <JHAMILTON@scana.com> wrote: ----- To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "HAMILTON, J. HAGOOD JR" <JHAMILTON@scana.com> Date: 07/09/2010 03:16PM Subject: SCE&G Request for Extension to re spond to Steam Electric Power Generating Questionnaires Ms. Alicea:

I called to speak with you and provide some deta il regarding SCE&G’s requ est for an extension to respond to the questionnaires but I understand from your voice mail that you will be out of the office until July 19.

By this email, SCE&G requests 45 day extensions to provide its responses to the questionnaires for each of its facilities as follows:

Williams (00864) Cope (09875) McMeekin (08395) Urquhart (09861) Wateree (03087) Canadys (01761)

Additional time is requested due to the fact that many of the same smal l group of employees of SCE&G are responsible for respondi ng to these questionnaires in addition to responding to the coal combustion information requests for its Wate ree and Urquhart facilities as well as assisting with the inspection of, and follow up submittals for, the Wateree facility by EPA’s contractors.

Thanks for your assistance.

J. Hagood Hamilton, Jr. Assistant General Counsel SCANA Corporation 

### Pa g e 1 of 2

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0544DO

...Mail Code C222 220 Operation Way Cayce, South Carolina 29033 Telephone No. 803.217.8938 E-mail address: hhamilton@scana.com 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0544DO

...
Order entered October 6, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00462-CR

TREVOR RUSSELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F21-75838-T

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 4, 2022 second motion to extend the 

time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s 

brief filed by November 4, 2022. If appellant fails to file his brief by November 4, 

2022, the Court may abate this case for a hearing in the trial court to determine 

why the brief has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE