40932 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 1998 / Notices

6. Federalism. In accordance with

Executive Order 12612, the policy does

not have significant Federalism effects.

This policy will not affect other

governments since it only applies to

lands and activities within the National

Wildlife Refuge System. This policy will

not affect small governments. A

Federalism assessment is not required.

7. Civil Justice Reform. In accordance

with Executive Order 12988, the Office

of the Solicitor has determined that the

policy does not unduly burden the

judicial system and meets the

requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)

of the Order.

8. Paperwork Reduction Act. This

regulation does not require any

information collection under the

Paperwork Reduction Act.

9. National Environmental Policy Act.

We have analyzed this policy in

accordance with the criteria of the

National Environmental Policy Act and

318 DM 2.2(g) and 6.3(D). This policy

does not constitute a major Federal

action significantly affecting the quality

of the human environment. An

environmental impact statement/

assessment is not required.

10. Government-to-Government

Relationship with Tribes. We have

evaluated possible effects on Federally

recognized Indian tribes in accordance

with the President’s memorandum of

April 29, 1994, ‘‘Government-toGovernment Relations with Native

American Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR

22951) and 512 DM 2. We have

determined there are no effects on

Federally recognized Indian tribes since

it only applies to lands and activities

within the National Wildlife Refuge

System.

Dated: April 6, 1998.

Jamie Rappaport Clark,

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 98–20458 Filed 7–30–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA–010–1220–00]

Meeting of the Central California

Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Meeting of the Central

California Resource Advisory Council.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Public Law 92–463) and the Federal

Land Policy and Management Act of

1976 (sec. 309), the Bureau of Land

Management Resource Advisory

Council for Central California will meet

in Galt, California.

DATES: August 7–8, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Consumnes River Preserve

Visitor Center, 13501 Franklin

Boulevard, Galt, California.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12

member Central California Resource

Advisory Council is appointed by the

Secretary of the Interior to advise the

Bureau of Land Management on public

land issues. The Council meetings will

begin at 8 a.m. both Friday and

Saturday, August 7 and 8, 1998. Agenda

items will include a status report on

standards and guidelines for grazing on

federal lands so as to maintain healthy

rangeland; a report on the problem of

invasive weeds and how to control

them; a review of the BLM land

exchange program and a discussion of

the status of management plans for

various BLM managed lands; and a tour

of the Cosumnes River Preserve. A

public comment period is scheduled for

1 p.m., Saturday, August 8, when

anyone may address the Council about

any public land issue. Written

comments will also be accepted at the

address below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Mercer, Public Affairs Officer,

Bureau of Land Management, 3801

Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93308,

telephone 805–391–6010.

Dated: July 24, 1998.

Stephen Larson,

Acting Field Office Manager.

[FR Doc. 98–20452 Filed 7–30–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–40–M

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–412]

Certain Video Graphics Display

Controllers and Products Containing

Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

compliant was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on July

1, 1998, under section 337 of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.

1337, on behalf of Cirrus Logic, Inc.,

3100 West Warren Avenue, Fremont,

California 94538. The complaint alleges

violations of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain video graphics display

controllers and products containing

same by reason of infringement of

claims 37 and 43 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,598,525. The complaint further alleges

that there exists an industry in the

United States as required by subsection

(a)(2) of section 337.

The complaint requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and a permanent cease

and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc. gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2571.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(1996).

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

July 27, 1998, Ordered That—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the important into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain video graphics

display controllers or products

containing same by reason of

infringement of claims 37 or 43 of U.S.

Letter Patent 5,598,525, and whether

there exists an industry in the United

States as required by subsection (a)(2) of

section 337.