alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the six-month period ended August 31, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                          83,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,239,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,000
<INVENTORY>                                    820,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,724,073
<PP&E>                                         384,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                 193,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,878,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,428,401
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,308,902
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,878,645
<SALES>                                      1,026,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,026,566
<CGS>                                          400,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  400,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,510,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,082,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,333,872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,082,661)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)


</TABLE>
27 September 2013 *************************

NSN: 8920-01-348-4694 (CVP) MONOGRAPH NO: M4H

Item: Pound cakes, Vanilla, Trans fat free (Type I, Flavor 1, Style 2)

Document: PCR-C-007, Cakes, Brownies, Muffin Tops and Filled Cakes, Packaged in a Flexible 

Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 310 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Intact, uniform cell (crumb) structure without evidence of excessive heating (materially 

darkened or scorched), and without evidence of compression streaks. May have slightly 

browned edges. Light tan surface and pale, off-white crumb.

Odor: Sweet vanilla.

Flavor: Sweet vanilla.

Texture: Dense, firm, tender, moist, and fine grain crumb.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessively moist, sticky surface or excessively dry surface and/or excessively dark 

surface and/or crumb. 

Odor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Flavor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Texture: Excessively moist or excessively dry and crumbly.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
No. 11-5555.

#### In re Joseph G. Dunbar, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 607,

181 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8085.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 392, 181 L. Ed. 2d 246, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6367.
No. 11-5928.

#### William M. Baker, Jr., Petitioner v. Gerdenich Realty Company.

565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 422,

181 L. Ed. 2d 275,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7375,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
New Ordering Process Flow - Flowchart

CUSTOMER submits 

registration with 

FOPOC information

CUSTOMER sends 

order request form to 

DLA Troop Support

UNFUNDED

TVLS sends order 

request form to 

Contracting Officer 

(KO)

1st EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION 

We received the 

order

KO reviews order 

request form, 

performs contract 

scope check

2nd EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION (if 

applicable) for SCOPE 

DENIAL

KO sends order 

request to 6 vendors 

for quote

Vendors submit offers 

to KO KO reviews offers

KO sends price 

notification 

spreadsheet to 

FOPOC, customer, 

and TVLS

3rd EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION FOPOC 

ACTION REQUIRED

FOPOC returns price 

notification 

spreadsheet with 

funding information 

to DLA

KO/Buyer review 

funding information

KO/Buyer finalize 

award decision

Winning vendor 

receives Notification 

from DLA regarding 

pending award

4th EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION 

DLA processed order 

- pending award

(MILS AE)

5th EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION 

DLA obligates funds 

and authorizes 

vendor performance 

(MILS BV)

- Customer Receives 

Material

- Customer Submits 

MRA

CUSTOMER completes 

order request form

- Vendor Ships

6th EMAIL 

NOTIFICATION

(MILS SS)

= Current Process = New Process = Modified Process

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5

Step 7 Step 6 Step 10 Step 9 Step 8

Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Step 15
7/18/14 Page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-14-0625 Reviewer: Wong/BC 

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed in 

NCEM2?

Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB 

Testing 

Required

No 

Hazard 

Concern

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other

Ingestion

Surface water

Ground water (landfill)

Consumer Use: DtD2

Inhalation

Air: incineration (stack)

Air: fugitive

Consumer Use: CEM3

Dermal

Consumer Use: CEM

Eco

Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

Consumer Use: DtD

1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 3

Consumer Exposure Model

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
No. 11-470.

#### William Harden, Petitioner v. Wicomico County, Maryland, et al.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1009,

181 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 158.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 143.
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A. Rothman,
President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 15, 2005
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.20 CWT 0.965 $11.77

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.1139 LB 3.5 $7.40

Class I Price $19.17

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.73 CWT 0.965 $11.32

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9038 LB 3.5 $6.66

Class I Price $17.98

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.19

(4) Price change per gallon $0.10

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.05

Price change per quart $0.03

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.10

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.05

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.03

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Dec. 5th, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, August 10, 1998.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: July 31, 1998
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-20915 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $15.31 CWT 0.965 $14.7742

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.5986 LB 3.5 $5.5951

Class I Price $20.3693

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.86 CWT 0.965 $14.3399

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.6755 LB 3.5 $5.8643

Class I Price $20.2042

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.1651

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0142

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0071

Price change per quart $0.0035

Price change per pint $0.0018

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0013

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0011

Price change per half pint $0.0009

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: December 1, 2013
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00095- CV
In re G erald B. Wilson

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Ger ald B . Wil son petitioned this C ourt for a writ of mandamus directingthe district c ourt to a c t on Wils on ’s mot ion fo r a jud g me nt n

un c pr o tu nc g ivi nghim

a dd iti on a l ja il t ime c re dit in cause number 7 4 , 0 7 5. Se eEx pa rteY ba rra , 149 S.W .3d 147, 148-49 (Te x . Crim. App. 2004). After the mandam u s petition was filed and a response was re quested, the district c ourt signe d a judgme nt nunc pro tunc giving Wi lson cre dit for the additional jail time he soug ht. Accor dingly , the petition for writ of manda mus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Waldrop Filed: Mar ch 17, 2006
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.18 CWT 0.965 $7.8937

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6529 LB 3.5 $9.2852

Class I Price $17.1789

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.39 CWT 0.965 $8.0964

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5634 LB 3.5 $8.9719

Class I Price $17.0683

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.1106

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0095

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0048

Price change per quart $0.0024

Price change per pint $0.0012

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0009

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0007

Price change per half pint $0.0006

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: July 7, 2019
(1) Adjusting Price $27.97 CWT

(2) Base Price $27.55 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.42

(4) Price change per gallon $0.04

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.02

Price change per quart $0.01 

Price change per pint $0.00

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: June 5th, 2022
No. 11-5584.

#### Armando Cardon-Cortez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 915, 132 S. Ct. 331,

181 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6089.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 322 Fed. Appx. 659.
#### F. P. Webster and K. R. Murrell, Jr., *Appellant,*v. C. H. Brown, J. E. McIntosh and C. W. Shepherd, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed May 25, 1926.

Petition for rehearing denied June 23, 1926.

*Sam E. Murrell,*for Appellant;

*T. G. Futch,*for Appellees.

Buford, J.

— This cause is before the Supreme Court *of*Florida on appeal from an order made by the Chancellor reinstating the bill of complaint as to K. R.' Murrell, Jr,, after the same had been dismissed because of failure of the *1008complainants to comply with Rule of Practice number fifty-five (No. 55).

It is contended by appellant that the order made by the Court reinstating the bill of complaint as against Murrell was invalid because notice of application for such order had not been given as required by the -rules of Court and by Section 3133, Revised General Statutes of Florida.

If the facts are as stated by appellant, then the order reinstating the cause should be vacated! The record does not affirmatively and positively show whether the notice was actually served or not and therefore this Court is bound by the language used by the Chancellor in making- the order reinstating the cause. This order recites: “This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that due notice of time and place has been given Mr. Murrell, 'solicitor for defendant, and he not appearing to resist the motion, upon consideration it is ordered and adjudged that the said motion be and is hereby granted, the order dismissing as to the defendant K. R; Murrell be vacated and said cause reinstated, and the complainant allowed to set down the demurrer of said K. R. Murrell for argument. ’ ’

No motion was made before the Chancellor to vacate the order of reinstating the cause and an affidavit filed among the case papers, after such order reinstating the cause was made by the Chancellor, cannot be considered by this Court.

In the absence of affirmative showing to the contrary this Court must assume that the recitals contained in the order of the Chancellor are based upon proof submitted to him.

If in fact no notice was served, as required by the rulos of Court and the Statutes, of the presentation of the motion to reinstate the cause as to appellant Murrell, the appellant will not by the affirmance of the order be denied *1009his right to make this showing before the Chancellor on a proper motion.to vacate the order.

The order of the Chancellor is affirmed.

Affirmed.' •

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion.
November 19, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LABYRON JAFFAR WARRE N , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00919

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Francis I. duPont, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Francis I. duPont, III

Francis I. duPont, III
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
No. 11-6739.

#### Clyde Williams, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 824,

181 L. Ed. 2d 533,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8759.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 460 Mass. 1007, 950 N.E.2d 865.
CYBER MERCHANTS EXCHANGE, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Cyber Merchants  Exchange,  Inc. Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB  for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Frank
S. Yuan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  Fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
          fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
          results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Frank S. Yuan
     -----------------
         Frank S. Yuan
Chief Executive Officer and Director
November 12, 2003

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyber Merchants Exchange, Inc. and
will be  retained  by  Cyber  Merchants  Exchange,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

The following is a summary description of the verbal arrangements with the Company’s non-employee members of the Board of Directorsregarding their compensation: 

 

Each non-employee director is paid an annual feeof $20,000 for his or her services as a director, and $1,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended. Each regular member of the Compensation Committee receives $1,000 for each Compensation Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of theCompensation Committee receives $2,000 for each Compensation Committee meeting attended. Each regular member of the Audit Committee receives $2,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives $3,000 foreach Audit Committee meeting attended. Each regular member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives $1,000 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of the Nominating and CorporateGovernance Committee receives $2,000 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended. All non-employee directors are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board of Directors meetings andcommittee meetings. New non-employee directors elected or appointed at any time other than at the August Board meeting will receive an initial pro-rated stock option grant in an amount equal to the product of (i) the percentage of the year remaininguntil the next regularly scheduled August Board meeting, and (ii) 12,000. Each non-employee director of the company automatically receives an annual grant of 12,000 options at the August meeting of the Board. These stock options are granted at thethen-current market price, and vest immediately but will not be exercisable until the one-year anniversary of the grant date.