alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
18 June 2015 **********************

NSN: 8960-00-170-8446 (CBMC) * MONOGRAPH M7C1

 **********************

Item: Cocoa beverage powder, Sugar sweetened, Without marshmallows, Milk chocolate, Flat 

interlocking closure pouch

Document: CID A-A-20189, Cocoa Beverage Powder and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 150 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 3 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered Product: Well blended homogenous mixture, free of lumps, light to medium 

brown color.

Hydrated Product: Well blended, uniform consistency without floating, agglomerated 

cocoa particles; light to medium brown; disperse readily in hot or cold water.

Odor: Powdered Product: Cocoa and sweet milk solids.

Hydrated Product: Sweet milk chocolate, cream-like.

Flavor: Hydrated Product: Sweet milk chocolate, cream-like.

Texture: Powdered Product: Free flowing and fine.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powdered product: Caking, lumpiness, darkened areas. Off colors. 

Hydrated product: Darkened color, settling or undissolved material.

Odor: Decreased cocoa odor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter chocolate.

Flavor: Decreased cocoa flavor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter chocolate.

Texture: Powdered product: Caked or lumpy (see Special Notes). 

Hydrated product: Particles fail to disperse in hot or cold water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state. Final examination should be done after reconstituting. 

Even if caked in the dry state it should be reconstituted for future reference.

Special Notes

Product may contain lumps which are of no concern provided they break or fall apart under light finger 

pressure. Dark brown specks may become larger as more moisture is absorbed into the product.
Facility ID Combustor ID 90% Fuel Category CO Average

(ppm @ 3% O2) Rank In top 12% LANelsonSteam EQT0003 Coal 35.77 1 Yes (a) LANelsonSteam EQT0001 Coal 36.90 2Yes (a)

MASaintGobain EU-523-01 Coal 155.85 3 No (a)

ILWesternILUniv Boiler #2 Coal 216.46 4 No (a) ILWesternILUniv Boiler #3 Coal 216.46 5No Danville Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 6 No Danville Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 7 No Danville Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 8 No Logan Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 9 No Logan Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 10 No Logan Correctional Center Permit -IL Coal 270.00 11 No Vienna Correctional Center Permit -IL Coal 270.00 12 No Vienna Correctional Center Permit –IL Coal 270.00 13 No Cedar Lane Farms 2 Permit -OH Coal 480.00 14 No Cedar Lane Farms 5 Permit -OH Coal 480.00 15No Cedar Lane Farms 9 Permit -OH Coal 600.00 16 No (a) Although the two boilers at the facility LANelsonSteam are in the top 12%, since their fuel is petroleum coke their data was not used. Therefore, MASaintGobain and ILWesternILUniv are considered in the top 12% and their data is used. MASaintGobain and ILWesternILUniv both use bituminous coal. 

### AP**PENDIX A -1: Coal CO Emission Test and Permit Data Ranked for MA** **CT Floor An** **aly sis** Results not used

because it is based on only 2 test runs.Facility ID Combustor ID 90% Fuel Category Hg Average

(lb/mmBtu) Rank In top 12%

NYAESGreenidgeDresden Boiler 6 Coal 3.54E-07 1 Yes

MASaintGobain EU-523-01 Coal 1.05E-06 2 No VAUofRichmond #4 Coal 1.42E-06 3 No AKClearAirForceStation EU ID 3 Coal 1.45E-06 4 No IAMidAmericanEnergyRiverside393 Boilers 7 & 8 Coal 2.95E-06 5 No OHDenisonUniversity B&WBoiler (B001) Coal 4.30E-06 6 No INLawrenceburgDistillers EU-96, # 6 Boiler Coal 5.59E-06 7 No 

### AP**PENDIX A -2: Coal Hg Emission Test and Permit Data Ranked for MA** **CT Floor An** **aly sis** Unit removed because it

is an EGU.

### Appendix A-3: Coal CO Run Data for MACT Floor Analy**sis**

Facility ID Combustor ID Test ID Test Date Data Source CO (ppm @ 3% O2) ln(value) NonDetect? ND Value ND < Avg MASaintGobain EU-523-01 Sample #2 2/20/2008 ICR Phase I 157.00 5.06 N/A N/A MASaintGobain EU-523-01 Sample #1 2/7/2007 ICR Phase I 154.70 5.04 N/A N/A ILWesternILUniv Boiler #2 Sample #1 6/29/2000 ICR Phase I 249.30 5.52 N/A N/A ILWesternILUniv Boiler #2 Sample #2 6/29/2000 ICR Phase I 268.37 5.59 N/A N/A ILWesternILUniv Boiler #2 Sample #3 6/29/2000 ICR Phase I 131.71 4.88 N/A N/A

### Appendix A-4: Coal Hg Run Data for MACT Floor Analy**sis**

Facility ID Combustor ID Test ID Test Date Data Source Hg (lb/mmBtu) ln(value) NonDetect? ND Value ND < Avg NYAESGreenidgeDresden Boiler 6 Sample #1 3/29/07 ICR Phase I 3.28E-07 -1.49E+01 ND 3.28E-07 3.28E-07 NYAESGreenidgeDresden Boiler 6 Sample #2 3/29/07 ICR Phase I 3.49E-07 -1.49E+01 ND 3.49E-07 3.49E-07 NYAESGreenidgeDresden Boiler 6 Sample #3 3/29/07 ICR Phase I 3.85E-07 -1.48E+01 ND 3.85E-07 N/A
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mary Foster, Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer of Edgar Express, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form10-K of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

 

Date: April 17, 2018

 

/s/ Mary Foster	

Mary Foster

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                    AGREEMENT

AUGUST 26, 2002

This agreement between Power Technology Inc. and the Swedish consortium, named
to be determined, outlines the following understanding and intentions.

For Power Technology Inc. to incorporate a European subsidiary in Sweden that
will be owned 49% by Power Technology Inc. and 51% by the Swedish consortium.
Power Technology to make its technology and patents available to be used to
conduct licensing, marketing, manufacturing and any other undertakings required
by the consortium to conduct its business in Europe. For the consortium to raise
funds to facilitate the acquisition of a fully operational automated machine to
mass produce Power Technology's battery grids in Bjurholm, Sweden. The funds to
be raised shall be a minimum of US $3,000,000 and have a time limit to expire on
December 31, 2002. These funds shall be used solely for the European market. All
future royalties generated by the consortium in Europe shall be paid into the
European subsidiary. The consortium will arrange for Catella Generics, an
institute having the expert ability to conduct life tests, to conduct a full
cycle life test of Power Technology's grids. The consortium reserves the right
to assign this test to another qualified lab of their choice. The members of the
consortium are:

Manfred Kolsch
Staffan Markstrom
Gunnar Sundqvist
Sven Lantz
Wolf Meyerfeld

This agreement is subject to the Swedish government to issue a license for the
production of battery plates or any other paraphernalia using lead as part of
the manufacturing process in the community of Bjurholm. The consortium will
reserve the right to chose a different location in Sweden, should licensing be
refused by the Swedish government.

/s/ Manfred Kolsch                     On behalf of Power
-----------------------------          Technology Inc.

/s/ Staffan Markstrom
-----------------------------

/s/ Gunnar Sundqvist                   /s/ Wolf Meyerfeld
-----------------------------          -----------------------------
                                       Director

/s/ Wolf Meyerfeld
-----------------------------
CY NEMS_gas_sales_2b NEMS_diesel_sales_2b NEMS_gas_sales_3 NEMS_diesel_sales_3

2011 179,196 213,800 42,339 105,470

2012 214,020 215,085 33,629 85,010

2013 232,346 218,410 35,231 90,111

2014 258,324 222,458 36,120 93,522

2015 281,977 228,679 37,187 97,442

2016 291,450 236,361 37,786 100,236

2017 297,939 241,624 37,342 100,086

2018 298,415 242,010 36,595 98,998

2019 299,180 242,631 35,670 97,285

2020 301,791 244,748 35,197 96,752

2021 302,538 245,354 34,854 96,252

2022 304,125 246,641 34,744 96,476

2023 303,636 246,244 34,469 96,295

2024 310,901 252,136 35,222 98,951

2025 316,652 256,800 35,875 101,313

2026 323,114 262,040 36,494 103,561

2027 327,403 265,519 36,955 105,249

2028 331,893 269,160 37,297 106,662

2029 336,853 273,182 37,411 107,158

2030 336,973 273,280 37,582 108,032

2031 337,716 273,882 37,746 108,824

2032 338,355 274,400 37,913 109,634

2033 338,324 274,376 38,013 110,225

2034 339,414 275,260 38,247 111,188

2035 341,028 276,568 38,551 112,344

2036 342,717 277,938 38,756 112,557

2037 345,042 279,824 39,152 113,943

2038 347,398 281,735 39,556 115,339

2039 349,161 283,164 39,897 116,537

2040 350,346 284,125 40,177 117,546Diesel Gas Gas share

319,270 221,535 0.409639

300,095 247,649 0.452125

308,521 267,577 0.464464

315,980 294,444 0.48236

326,121 319,164 0.494609

336,597 329,236 0.494472

341,710 335,281 0.495252

341,008 335,010 0.495564

339,916 334,850 0.496246

341,500 336,988 0.496675

341,606 337,392 0.496897

343,117 338,869 0.496886

342,539 338,105 0.496743

351,087 346,123 0.49644

358,113 352,527 0.49607

365,601 359,608 0.495868

370,768 364,358 0.49564

375,822 369,190 0.495549

380,340 374,264 0.495974

381,312 374,555 0.49553

382,706 375,462 0.495223

384,034 376,268 0.494893

384,601 376,337 0.49457

386,448 377,661 0.49425

388,912 379,579 0.493928

390,495 381,473 0.494156

393,767 384,194 0.493847

397,074 386,954 0.493546

399,701 389,058 0.493253

401,671 390,523 0.492964
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period August 23, 2017 through March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofAugust 23, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and

(2) To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2018. 

 

 
1
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

COMMERCE UNION BANK AND COMMERCE UNION BANCSHARES, INC. 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO

 ORGANIZER STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to that certain Organizer Stock Option Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as
of the date set forth below, by and among Commerce Union Bank (the “Bank”), Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), and the optionee whose name appears below (“Optionee”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Bank entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (the “Share Exchange
Agreement”), dated April 26, 2011, pursuant to which, as of June 6, 2012, the Company assumed all responsibilities and obligations of the Bank with respect to all outstanding Bank Stock Options, as defined in the
Share Exchange Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company, the Bank, and the Optionee entered into the Organizer Stock Option Agreement
(“Stock Option Agreement”), dated August 23, 2006, and now wish to amend the Stock Option Agreement to revise the terms under which the Optionee may exercise Options. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the undersigned agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Amendment of Section 3. Section 3 of the Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. Organizer Stock Option Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the current contents thereof in their entirety and
substituting therefor the following: 

 3. Option Term. Subject to the terms of paragraphs 4 and 5 hereof, the
Option may be exercised at any time with respect to shares of Stock as to which it has vested prior to the close of business on the thirteenth (13th) anniversary of the Grant Date (the “Expiration Date”). To the extent not exercised,
this Option shall expire as of that date. 
  

	 	2.	Amendment of Section 15(a). Section 15(a) of the Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. Organizers Stock Option Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the current contents thereof in their entirety and
substituting therefor the following: 

 15(a). Unless the amendment constitutes an action adverse to the
Optionee, this Agreement may be amended or otherwise modified by the Board of Directors of Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc., as it deems appropriate, without the consent of the Optionee. An amendment or other modification deemed adverse to the
Optionee must be evidenced in writing and signed by both an authorized officer of the Company and the Optionee, or his or her duly appointed attorney-in-fact. 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, the Bank, and the Optionee have duly executed this Second
Amendment to the Organizer Stock Option Agreement, which shall be deemed effective as of June 19, 2014. 
  

					
	COMMERCE UNION BANCSHARES, INC.	 		 	OPTIONEE
	AND	 		 	
	COMMERCE UNION BANK	 		 	
		 		 	  

		 		 	(Signature)
			
	  
	 		 	  

	William Ronald DeBerry, President and CEO	 		 	(Print Name)


  
 2
(1) Adjusting Price $21.81 CWT

(2) Base Price $21.27 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.54

(4) Price change per gallon $0.05

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.02

Price change per quart $0.01 

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.05

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Jan. 2nd, 2022
No. 11-7520.

#### Wynell Gray, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1056,

181 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 340.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 562.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00011-CV

JOHN CORES

v.

CARROLL F. LABORDE, BARBARA LABORDE AND LABORDE PROPERTIES, LP,

A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

On Appeal from the

2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 25,760

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 21, 2018
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3294 

To permit legally married same-sex couples to amend their filing status 

for tax returns outside the statute of limitations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2019 

Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Mr. PANETTA, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. BEYER, Mr. PASCRELL, 

and Ms. MOORE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To permit legally married same-sex couples to amend their 

filing status for tax returns outside the statute of limitations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refund Equality Act 

5 of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3294 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF LIMITATION FOR CER2 TAIN LEGALLY MARRIED COUPLES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual first 

4 treated as married for purposes of the Internal Revenue 

5 Code of 1986 by the application of the holdings of Rev6 enue Ruling 2013–17— 

7 (1) if such individual filed a separate return for 

8 a taxable year ending before September 16, 2013, 

9 for which a joint return could have been made by 

10 the individual and the individual’s spouse but for the 

11 fact that such holdings were not effective at the time 

12 of filing, the time prescribed by section 

13 6013(b)(2)(A) for filing a joint return after filing a 

14 separate return shall not expire before the date pre15 scribed by law (including extensions) for filing the 

16 return of tax for the taxable year that includes the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act, and 

18 (2) in the case of a joint return filed pursuant 

19 to paragraph (1)— 

20 (A) the period of limitation prescribed by 

21 section 6511(a) of such Code for any such tax22 able year shall be extended until the date pre23 scribed by law (including extensions) for filing 

24 the return of tax for the taxable year that in25 cludes the date of the enactment of this Act, 

26 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3294 IH

1 (B) section 6511(b)(2) shall not apply to 

2 any claim of credit or refund with respect to 

3 such return. 

4 (b) AMENDMENTS, ETC. RESTRICTED TO CHANGE IN

5 MARITAL STATUS.—Subsection (a) shall apply only with 

6 respect to amendments to the return of tax, and claims 

7 for credit or refund, relating to a change in the marital 

8 status for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 of the individual. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-6383.

#### Michael Paul Bradley, Petitioner v. Donald Barrow, Warden.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 585,

181 L. Ed. 2d 430,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8280.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jordan, Ronald 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Ron, 

Tim Pickett <timpickett@frontierwater.com > 

Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:24 PM 

Jordan, Ronald 

Oxidant Mitigation in FGD Wastewater Treatment- CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 

INFORMATION 

Jordan 063015.pdf 

I was made aware that an issue was raised re: oxidant formation in scrubber wastewater and the impacts on 

downstream biological treatment. As we are providers of biological treatment solutions and have an 

understaning in this area, I wanted to weigh in on our experiences in the mitigation of oxidizing compounds 

prior to biological treatment. 

Please see attached letter. As we consider this proprietary information, please treat as CBI. 

Regards, 

Tim Pickett 

Tim Pick 

Front1er Water Systems 

Cht 1 r 11 I y ' 1 

8 Easl Broadway, Suile 330 

Salt Lake C1ty, UT 84110 

D 801.232.9206
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2017-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 15, 2019



| | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
P. 1


# OAR Box 1158 Prepped by RyanDugan



### Document

Number: 

# 55 ) l-C-3 1 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 4/28/2008 2:34:14

PM Sheet 55 of 349-r.-- -. P. 2 

### A-88-02
. X-C-3 1

\. A UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1



### 1 AP R'OC C 

# w.

\\ 1 '• Mr . Mat t Cato n Environmenta l Enginee r Lufkin® Pos t Offic e Box72 8 Apex , Nort hCarolin a 2750 2 Dea r Mr . Caton : Th e repor t o n ou r visi t t o th e Lufkin®plan t i nApex , Nort hCarolina , onDecembe r 19 , 1985 , ha s bee nrewritte na s requeste di nyou r Marc h5 , 1986 , transmitta l an

d i s considere da fina l report . Non e o f th e informatio ncontaine di n th e tri prepor t 1 s considere dconfidentia l b y th e U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y becaus e n o clai m

fo r confidentia l treatmen t wa s mad e i n you r transmittal . I f yo u hav e an

y question s o r additiona l comments , pleas e contac t m e a t (919 ) 541-560 1 b

y Apri l 21 , 1986 . Sincerely ,

Al Vervaer t Industria l Studie s Branc h Emissio nStandard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n Enclosur e

/P. 3

Docke t No . A-88-0 2 Subcategor yI- C Th e enclosur e t o thi s documen t ma yb e foun d i n docke t ite mI-B
- 10



### *2*