alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.16 CWT 0.965 $5.9444

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6073 LB 3.5 $9.1256

Class I Price $15.0700

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.57 CWT 0.965 $5.3751

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.3789 LB 3.5 $8.3262

Class I Price $13.7012

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.3688

(4) Price change per gallon $0.1177

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0588

Price change per quart $0.0294

Price change per pint $0.0147

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0106

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0088

Price change per half pint $0.0074

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.12

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per quart $0.03

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: August 7, 2016
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3427 

To repeal the renewable fuel program of the Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2019 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Mr. STEWART, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

MEADOWS, Mr. GOODEN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. HICE of Georgia, and Mr. ROY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal the renewable fuel program of the Environmental 

Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating the RFS 

5 and Its Destructive Outcomes Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RENEWABLE FUEL PROGRAM. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)) is repealed. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3427 IH

1 (1) CLEAN AIR ACT.—Section 211(d) of the 

2 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(d)) is amended— 

3 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

4 (i) by striking ‘‘(n), or (o)’’ each place 

5 it appears and inserting ‘‘or (n)’’; and 

6 (ii) by striking ‘‘(m), or (o)’’ and in7 serting ‘‘or (m)’’; and 

8 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(n), and 

9 (o)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘and 

10 (n)’’. 

11 (2) PETROLEUM MARKETING PRACTICES ACT.— 

12 Section 107(a)(1)(B) of the Petroleum Marketing 

13 Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 2807(a)(1)(B)) is amended 

14 by inserting ‘‘, as in effect on the day before the 

15 date of enactment of the Eliminating the RFS and 

16 Its Destructive Outcomes Act’’ after ‘‘(40 CFR, part 

17 80)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.47. APPENDIX 3.47**

**SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT SUBSTITUTE ITEM ACCEPTANCE**

## 

2

**AP3.51-**

AP3.47-1

APPENDIX 3.47
to the attention of the (person searched) (person in possession, if any person be found at the place or on the premises searched.) The search will be made in the

(daytime) (nighttime), and if the property is found there, you shall seize it, issue a receipt therefor to the person from whom the property is taken or in whose possession

the property is found, deliver the property to the Agency evidence custodian and prepare a written inventory of the property. If there is no person at the searched place

to whom the receipt may be delivered, the receipt will be left in a conspicuous location at the place or on the premises where the property is found.

COMMANDER'S AUTHORIZATION TO SEARCH

TO:

(NAME AND ORGANIZATION OF PERSON TO WHOM AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN)

An affidavit having been made before me by

(NAME OF AFFIANT)

(ORGANIZATION OR ADDRESS OF AFFIANT)

I am satisfied that there is probable cause to believe that the matters mentioned in that affidavit are true and correct, that the offense set forth therein has been

committed, and that the property to be seized is located (on the person) (at the place) to be searched, you are hereby authorized to search the (person) (place) known

as:

for the property described as:

bringing this authorization

Dated this day of , 20 .

(SIGNATURE, TYPED NAME, AND ORGANIZATION OF COMMANDER)

DLA FORM 1744, MAY 2000 (EG) PDF (DLA)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Farmer Bros. Co. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wahba, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: September 14, 2010



/s/    JEFFREY A.
WAHBAJeffrey A. Wahba
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-11022.

#### Sergio Martin Ortega, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 204,

181 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5978.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-11229.

#### Don Perkins, Petitioner v. Kenneth T. McKee, Warden.

565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 230,

181 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6718.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 822.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Weather Service; Notice of Opportunity for Public 
Comment on the Strategic Network Plan

AGENCY: National Weather Service (NWS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment on the Strategic 
Network Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NWS is announcing its interest in obtaining public 
comments on its future networking plans.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until September 21, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Requests for a copy of the Strategic Network Plan should be 
made via the Internet at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/snp. The following is 
the sequence of steps: access the Internet at the above address; 
register your organization as directed at the Internet site; receive a 
password from the NWS; review the Strategic Network Plan; submit your 
comments via the Internet to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee83878d868f8b82c09d8785819c9d8587ae80818f8fc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abc6c2c8c3cacec785d8c2c0c4d9d8c0c2ebc5c4caca85ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael T. Sikorski at 301-713-1737x221.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Systems Operations of the NWS 
has recently completed a review of existing and planned NWS data 
communication networks and current and anticipated data distribution 
requirements and has developed a preliminary strategy for accomplishing 
future integration of these networks, including the central collection 
of radar data. The NWS is interested in obtaining outside comments on 
its networking plans for the future. Accordingly, interested parties 
are invited to review preliminary NWS plans and offer their views and 
suggestions on future networking directions that the NWS should 
consider.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
John J. Kelly, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.
[FR Doc. 98-19543 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT PAUL BROWN, JR. ,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL SCOTT BROWN ,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 12

- 2446

[ July 15, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Martin Colin , Judge; L.T. Case No.
502009CP004124XXXXSB

.

Craig A. Boudreau, Wellington, for appellant.

Nancy Guffey and Peter M. Feaman of Peter M. Feaman, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellee.

G ERBER , J

.

A n estate beneficiary appeals from the circuit cou rt’s final order directing the personal representative to divide and distribute “ the [ decedent’s ] Georgia real estate and Florida real estate and other
miscell aneous inventory assets of the E state ” amongst several estate
beneficiaries

. The appellant primarily argues that t he circuit court lacked jurisdiction to direct the personal representative to distribute the
decedent’s Georgia real estate

.

We agree and reverse that portion of the order on appeal

. See Polkowski
v. Polkowski , 854 So. 2d 286, 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ( “L ike lines in the sand, state boundaries determine a court’s ju r isdiction over real property, ”
and thus the court lacked in rem jurisdiction to order the partition and
sale of foreign property ); Pawlik v. Pawlik

, 545 So. 2d 506, 507 (Fla. 2d

DCA 198 9) (“In no event could the [circuit] court effect a partition of lands
outside this state.” ) (citation omitted); In re Roberg’s Estate

, 396 So. 2d 235, 235

- 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (“ When a testator executes a will devising lands in two or more states, the courts in each state construe it as to the lands located therein as if devised by separate wills

. ” ) (citations omitted).2

To partition property from outside this state, the personal representative needs to open an ancillary action in Georgia. See § 64.022, Fla. Stat. (201 2) (a suit for partition “shall be brought in any county where the lands or any part thereof lie which are the subject matter of the action.”).

In all other respects, we affirm the order on appeal without further
discussion.

Affirmed in part, r eversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

S TEVENSON and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-5728.

#### Richard Daron Kennedy, Petitioner v. Leon Forniss, Warden.

565 U.S. 949, 132 S. Ct. 412,

181 L. Ed. 2d 269,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7408.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-10869.

#### Wayne Rivers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 183,

181 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6408.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01923**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 01923\01923_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01923\01923_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 01923\01923_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01923\01923_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01923\01923_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01923\Certification Statement_01923.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01923\Supplemental Documents\01923_MAP-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01923\Supplemental Documents\01923_WB-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01923\Supplemental Documents\01923_WB-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### x 01923\Supplemental Documents\01923_ZOK27MSDS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 009 Attachment Name CAS RN 151688-56-1 Manufacturing Process and Impurity Profile Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, 3. (Chem 2) Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19303]



[[Page 38787]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-116; RM-9281]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lovell, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Windy 
Valley Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 296C at Lovell, 
Wyoming, as the community's first local aural transmission service. 
Channel 296C can be allotted to Lovell in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 25.4 kilometers (15.8 miles) south at petitioner's 
requested site. The coordinates for Channel 296C at Lovell are North 
Latitude 44-36-23 and West Longitude 108-23-30.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as follows: A. Wray 
Fitch, III, Esq., Gammon & Grange, P.C., 8280 Greensboro Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-3807( Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-116, adopted July 1, 
1998, and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19303 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
No. 11-6265.

#### Otha Eric Townsend, Petitioner v. Sharon Jacks.

565 U.S. 974, 132 S. Ct. 520,

181 L. Ed. 2d 344,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7641.

October 31, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 577.
Catch-up Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Who Start Late or Who Are More than 1 Month Behind												
																						
																					
											
											Syndication code for the Catch-up Immunization Schedule Schedule has been updated.
												  Please go to CDC’s **Public Health Media Library** page to copy and paste the updated embed code to your website.

			
							
			
			
			
			
 
      Page last reviewed:  February 9, 2023						
						Content
							source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as ofSeptember 1, 2017 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administratorand Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the BANK2017-BNK7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK7 **(BANK2017-BNK7)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1 2019
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In The Matter Of: 

JETBLUE AIRWAYS 

CORPORATION 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0813 

Case No. 2012EAI50022 

PROPOSED AGREED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Pnrsuant to Yonr Honor's Order of March 3, 2015, the parties respectfully request the 

following proposed briefing schedule with respect to JetBlue Airways Corporation's anticipated 

motion to dismiss: 

• Motion: April 24, 2015 

• Opposition: May 4, 2015 

• Reply: May 14, 2015 

The parties also respectfully request oral argument by telephone on one of the following 

three proposed dates and times: 

• June 2, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 

• June 3, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 

• June 4, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 

RECEIVED 

MAR 2 7 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 
The parties further advise the Court that they continue to discuss settlement and will 

advise the Court if and when a settlement is agreed. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: s~~--'_.._ ~-~~ Steven Raffael~J 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

31 West 52"d Street 

New York, New York 10019 

Tel.: (212) 513-3200 

Fax: (212) 385-9010 

Email: Steven.Raffaelc@hklaw.com 

Attorneys for Respondent 

JetBlue Airways Corporation 

Dated: March 19,2015 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day, copies of the foregoing Proposed Agreed Briefing Schedule 

were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

011ice of Hearings, M20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Christian Lewerenz, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

I Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Tel: 718 553-3273 

Fax: 718 995-5699 

Email: christian.lewerenz@faa.gov 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WIOOO 

IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WIOOO 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

3 
I hereby further certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Proposed Agreed Briefing 

Schedule were sent via facsimile as follows: 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

New York, New York 10019 

4
No. 11-6539.

#### Shawn Dillard, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 991, 132 S. Ct. 530,

181 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7702.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 158.
1

Mr. John M. Pearson 

Director, DLA Distribution Richmond, Va. 

 Retired United States Navy Supply Corps Cmdr. John M. Pearson was selected to become 

the director of DLA Distribution Richmond, Va. on June 18, 2010, after serving almost two 

years as its deputy commander. 

 Pearson is a native of Houston, Texas. He earned his Bachelor of Business Administration 

in Finance from Baylor University, a Master of Business Administration from Hawaii Pacific 

University and a Master of Science from the Naval Postgraduate School. Upon obtaining his 

undergraduate degree and prior to joining the military, he worked for CONOCO’s North 

American Production Department in Midland, Texas. 

 Commissioned through the Naval Reserve Direct Commission Officer Program in 1987, 

Pearson entered active duty in 1988 and attended the Navy Supply Corps School before 

reporting on board his first tour as the assistant supply officer of USS MCCLOY (FF-1038). 

An additional afloat tour included the USS PLATTE (AO-186) as supply officer. He 

participated in Operations Desert Storm and Provide Comfort on board the USS PLATTE and 

achieved his initial warfare qualification. 

 Pearson’s shore tour assignments included petroleum intern at Fleet and Industrial Supply 

Center in Norfolk, Va.; petroleum plans officer at U.S. Pacific Command, Camp H. M. Smith, 

Hawaii; business financial manager for the F-14 “Tomcat” and later the E-2C “Hawkeye” 

program offices at Naval Air Systems Command in Patuxent River, Md.; assistant chief of the 

contracting division in the Bulk Fuels Commodity Business Unit at Defense Energy Support 

Center in Fort Belvoir, Va.; Commander, DLA Distribution Mapping (January 2004 until June 

2007); and an assignment at DLA Aviation in Richmond, Va. 

 His functional specialties while in uniform included financial management, 

acquisition/contract management and petroleum management. In addition, he was a 

designated Joint Specialty Officer. Pearson is a member of the Defense Acquisition 

Professional Corps and earned his Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act Level III 

Certifications in Contracting and Business, Cost Estimating, and Financial Management.