alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41272-41273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
(NV-930-1430-01; NVN 59082)


Public Land Order No. 7349; Withdrawal of Public Land for 
National Weather Service Administration Site; Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 15 acres of public land from surface 
entry and mining for a period of 20 years for use by the Department of 
Commerce,

[[Page 41273]]

National Weather Service as an administrative site. The land has been 
and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis J. Samuelson, BLM Nevada State 
Office, P.O. Box 12000, Reno, Nevada, 89520, 702-861-6532.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
land is hereby withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry 
under the general land laws, including the United States mining laws 
(30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1994)), but not from leasing under the mineral 
leasing laws, for use by the Department of Commerce, National Weather 
Service as an administrative site:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 34 N., R. 55 E.,
    Sec. 2, S\1/2\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\ and SW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 15 acres in Elko County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those public land laws governing the use of lands 
under lease, license, or permit, or governing the disposal of their 
mineral or vegetative resources other than under the mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: July 22, 1998.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-20622 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.99 CWT 0.965 $14.47

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.1373 LB 3.5 $10.98

Class I Price $25.45

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $13.98 CWT 0.965 $13.49

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.1098 LB 3.5 $10.88

Class I Price $24.38

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.07

(4) Price change per gallon $0.09

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.05

Price change per quart $0.02

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.09

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.05

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.02

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: May 1st, 2022
ROBERT MOLINO 

Is inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this second day of June 1998 

for his extraordinary leadership and support as Deputy Commander of DSCP and for his continuous 

outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DSCP from 1986 to 1994. Mr. Molino is a 

recognized national leader in the field of acquisition management and electronic commerce. He was 

a pioneer in linking the Defense Department with the business community for electronic 

partnership into the 21st century. He created the New Business Strategies Demonstration Program 

which centered on adopting commercial buying techniques and emulated commercial ordering and 

distribution systems. He also reduced suppliers' dependence on defense business through shared 

production agreements with commercial customers. Through all of his initiatives, he positioned 

DSCP to be the supplier of choice. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/molino.htm 1/21/2016
No. 10-357.

#### Patsy Maharam, Petitioner v. James Patterson, et al.

562 U.S. 1135, 131 S. Ct. 904,

178 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 199.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 240.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   May 15, 2009
No. 11-6465.

#### Salame M. Amr, Petitioner v. Eddie N. Moore, et al.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 526,

181 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7913,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 584.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $13.75 CWT 0.965 $13.27

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.3886 LB 3.5 $11.86

Class I Price $25.13

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.64 CWT 0.965 $14.13

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.3543 LB 3.5 $11.74

Class I Price $25.87

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (0.74)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.06)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.03)

Price change per quart ($0.02)

Price change per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price change per half pint ($0.00)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) ($0.06)

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) ($0.03)

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: August 7th, 2022
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Cory J. Reed, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 30, 2017 through October 28, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 18, 2017 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 11,   2019 | * * | Deere Credit   Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------|
|                          |     |                               |
| * *                      | * * | * *                           |
|                          | By:      | */s/   Cory J. Reed*               |
|                          |     | Cory J. Reed                       |
|                          |     | President                          |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

h0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144619

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144619

COA: 300538

Wayne CC: 09

- 026848

- FC

JEREMIAH JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2011

judgment of the Court of Ap peals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3935 STANDARD 27.81 -0.10 7.55

Tolerance

1 3935A GREEN LIMIT 28.09 -0.52 7.65 0.28 -0.42 0.10 0.61

2 3935B VIOLET LIMIT 28.02 0.14 7.33 0.21 0.24 -0.22 0.41

3 3935C FULL LIMIT 26.64 -0.09 7.67 -1.17 0.01 0.12 0.77

4 3935D THIN GREEN 

LIMIT 28.81 -0.31 7.53 1.00 -0.21 -0.02 0.72

5 3935E BLUE/GREEN 

LIMIT 27.85 -0.35 7.31 0.04 -0.25 -0.2 0.41

6 3935F THIN ORANGE 

LIMIT 28.6 -0.08 7.67 0.79 0.02 0.12 0.53

7 3935G THIN BLUE/GREEN 

LIMIT 28.22 -0.35 7.17 0.41 -0.25 -0.4 0.56

8 3935H YELLOW LIMIT 27.56 -0.29 7.85 -0.25 -0.19 0.30 0.41

9 3935I RED LIMIT 26.92 0.16 7.66 -0.89 0.26 0.11 0.69

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number GREEN 2212 Piece/Roll Number 3935

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 20, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, POLYESTER/WOOL 

GABARDINE MIL-DTL-10176K
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 LODGIAN, INC.By:
    /s/ Peter T. CyrusPETER T. CYRUSInterim President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ James A. MacLennanJAMES A. MACLENNANExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   41
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2865 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce prison 

populations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. COHEN, Mrs. DEMINGS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, and Mr. TRONE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce 

prison populations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mass Incarcer5 ation Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Omnibus Crime 

8 Control and Safe Street Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3711 et 

9 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2865 IH

1 ‘‘PART OO—STATE PRISON POPULATION 

2 REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM 

3 ‘‘SEC. 3051. GRANT PROGRAM. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make 

5 grants to States to assist States in reducing crime rates 

6 and incarcerations. 

7 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY.—A State shall be eligible to re8 ceive a grant under this section if the State demonstrates 

9 that, during the 3-year period preceding the application 

10 for a grant under this section— 

11 ‘‘(1) the total number of individuals incarcer12 ated in correctional or detention facilities in the 

13 State was reduced by not less than 7 percent; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the rate of crime within the State did not 

15 increase by more than 3 percent. 

16 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION.—An eligible State seeking a 

17 grant under this section shall submit to the Attorney Gen18 eral an application in such form and manner and at such 

19 time as the Attorney General requires, which shall include 

20 a clear methodology based on population size and other 

21 factors. 

22 ‘‘(d) USE OF GRANT FUNDS.—A grant awarded 

23 under this section shall be used by a State to implement 

24 evidence-based programs designed to reduce crime rates 

25 and incarcerations.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2865 IH

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 1001(a) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

3 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)) is amended by 

4 adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(28) There are authorized to be appropriated to 

6 carry out part OO $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

7 2020 through 2029.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


National Institutes of Health; Notice of Decision on Application 
for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 97-093. Applicant: National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. Instrument: Micromanipulator Microscope, Model MSM. 
Manufacturer: Singer Instrument Co., Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended 
Use: See notice at 62 FR 62288, November 21, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides an optical 
microscope mounted over a micromanipulator with a videoscreen and 
camera and a unique optic-fiber dissection needle. A university 
research laboratory and a manufacturer of similar equipment advised 
December 23, 1997 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the 
applicant's intended purpose and (2) they know of no domestic 
instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign 
instrument for the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-2060 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1LJI'L.IIJLL,.,.
...**iI"~""'n.·**... iI" 

### of Environmental Protection

Secretary
Mr. Donald S. Welsh Regional Administrator 

### Rachel Carson State Of1ice Building P.O. Box 

### 2063**~** 

### Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 August 29, 2007

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Welsh: 717-787-2814

In accordance with Section 172 ofthe Clean Air Act, 42 U.S. C. 

### § 7502, I am pleased to submit the Attainment Demonstration for the Pennsylvania portion ofthe moderate eight-hour ozone Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Nonattainment Area for approval as a revision to Pennsylvania's State ImplementationPlan (SIP). This SIP revision, which is based, in part, on photochemical grid modeling, air quality trends, and emission trends, demonstrates howthe Commonwealthwill attain the health-based eight-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by June 15, 2010. The public participation process for this SIP revision included a public hearing inNorristown on June 22,2007, and a 30-daywritten comment period, which closed on June 26, 2007. I have enclosed two hard copies and one compact disk ofthe SIP revision for the southeasternPennsylvania (Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties) eight-hour ozone nonattainment area. The complete submittal includes the following: (1) attainment demonstration (including the mobile emissions budget for purposes of transportation conformity); (2) certification ofpublic participation activities; (3) technical support document (including the 2002 base year inventory; and (4) the CommentlResponse Document. In addition, the SIP submittal includes the 2008 and 2009 reasonable further progress milestones, the base year 2002 emissions inventory, a reasonably available control measure analysis, a description ofcontingency measures that will be implementedto bring the area back into attainment should violations oftheNAAQS occur afterthe standard is attained, and mobile source emissionbudgets for purposes oftransportation conformity. Ifyou have questions orneed additional information, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau ofAir Quality, bye-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us orbytelephone at 717-787-9702.

Enclosures

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us 

### ru Printed on Recycled Paper 

## \6¢1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 6400

MICHAEL ANTHONY BREYAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HENRY MCMASTER, Governor , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 2:24

- cv - 00565

- BHH )

Submitted : Ju ly 25 , 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6400 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Breyan appeals the district court’s order a ccepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Breyan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous
and for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Breyan v. McMaster , No. 2:24

- cv - 00565

- BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2024) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6400 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
A recent (12/19/10) system change resulted in a data structure change within the source database (Federal Logistics Information System-FLIS) used to create the TABL121.TXT file.  This change required the addition of the Item Name Code (INC_4080) field within the TABL121.TXT file and the record layout below has been adjusted accordingly.
Because of the potential length of the last data element (ED_CRITE_STMT_4129), each logical FIIG_4065 record is split across two physical records.  The first nine data elements are displayed together on one line and the following line contains the associated ED_CRITE_STMT_4129 value.

Field Name    				Length  
------------  				--------

(First Record)

INC_4080			VAR/DLM(|)
FIIG_4065				VAR/DLM(|)
DIC_3920				VAR/DLM(|)
MRC_3445				VAR/DLM(|)
MODE_CD_4735				VAR/DLM(|)
ISAC_LMTN_CD_0825			VAR/DLM(|)
ISAC_PRES_CD_2348			VAR/DLM(|)
PROP_CHAR_CD_2514			VAR/DLM(|)
REF_MRC_4475				VAR/DLM(|)
CRD_SEQ_CD_8264  			VAR/DLM(|)

(Second Record)

ED_CRITE_STMT_4129 			VAR/DLM(|)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10691 Conference Calendar

GUSTAVO GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NFN MOORE, Correctional Officer III, Et Al., Defendants, NFN MOORE, Correctional Officer III; SHARON HOFFMAN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-3188-AH

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gustavo Gutierrez, Texas state prisoner 605506, argues that the district court erred in denying his motions for appointment of counsel to represent him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. We have reviewed the record, including the briefs of the parties, and have determined that the district court did notNo. 98-10691 -2- abuse its discretion in denying Guiterrez’s motions for appointment of counsel. The issues in the case were not complex and Gutierrez adequately presented his position to the district court. The case did not give rise to exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. See Cupit v. Jones , 835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir. 1987). Gutierrez has not argued on appeal that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law and dismissing his complaint. Therefore, he has abandoned this claim. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
≥95% (12 awardees)

75% - 94% (33 awardees)

50% - 74% (8 awardees)

25% - 49% (0 awardees)

<25% (1 awardee)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (1 awardee)

Percentage of adolescents aged 11 – 17 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2019

National Participation: 82% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2019 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
No. 11-6831.

#### Michael Baker, Petitioner v. Roger E. Walker, Jr., et al.

565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,

181 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8146.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, denied.