alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Preteens Need HPV Vaccine to Prevent Cancer
 

Protect the Circle of Life: “Let us put our minds together to see what life we can make for our children.” - Sitting Bull, Lakota Sioux, 1877 

Why does my child need HPV vaccine? 

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a very common virus that can 

cause cancer. HPV vaccination is the best way to prevent your 

child from getting infected with the most common HPV types 

that cause cancer. 

Cancer is a leading cause of death for American Indians. In 

women, HPV infections can cause cancers of the anus, cervix, 

vagina, vulva, and the mouth/throat area. HPV infection can 

cause cancers of the anus, penis, and the mouth/throat area in 

men. Also, both women and men can get genital warts from 

HPV infections. HPV vaccination provides protection from the 

infections that cause these health problems. 

Who should get HPV vaccine? 

All boys and girls need HPV vaccination when they are 11 or 12 

years old so they can be protected from HPV infections. Teens 

and young adults who didn’t start or finish the HPV vaccine series also need HPV vaccine. Young women can get HPV vaccine 

until they are 27 years old and young men can get HPV vaccine 

until they are 22 years old. Young men who have sex with other 

men or who have weakened immune systems can also get HPV 

vaccine until they are 27. 

Does the HPV vaccine work? 

Yes, HPV vaccine works very well. Since HPV vaccination 

started, HPV infections have decreased in teen girls and boys. 

HPV vaccine is also preventing cervical precancers in young 

women who were vaccinated as preteens and teens. 

Is HPV vaccination safe? 

Yes. HPV vaccination has been studied very carefully and no 

serious safety concerns have been linked to HPV vaccination. 

HPV vaccine, like all other vaccines, has been continually 

monitored to be sure it is safe and works well. Preteens and 

teens may experience mild side effects such as redness and 

soreness in the area of the arm where the shot was given. The 

benefits of HPV vaccination far outweigh any possible risk of 

side effects. 

Some preteens and teens may faint after getting a shot or any 

other medical procedure. Sitting or lying down for about 15 

minutes after getting shots can help prevent injuries that could 

happen if your child were to fall while fainting. 

Serious side effects from the HPV vaccine are rare. Children 

with severe allergies to yeast or latex shouldn’t get certain 

HPV vaccines. Be sure to tell the doctor or nurse if your child 

has any severe allergies. 

How can I get help paying for HPV vaccine? 

American Indian/Alaska Native children younger than 

19 years of age can get shots for free through the Vaccines 

for Children (VFC) Program. All IHS, tribal and urban 

Indian health clinics offer shots through the VFC program. 

So do many private doctors. Check with your healthcare 

provider or your local clinic. 

CS258607-B 

For more information about HPV infection and HPV vaccine, 

visit www.cdc.gov/HPV 

Dec 2015
No. 11-28.

#### Bernice Malcolm, Petitioner v. Honeoye Falls Lima Central School District.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 869,

181 L. Ed. 2d 566,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8918.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 244, 181 L. Ed. 2d 139, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5310.
No. 11-6577.

#### Ronald Dean Lancaster, Petitioner v. Alfred Bigelow, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,

181 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8153,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 773.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2779
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           271156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        150708
<OTHER-SE>                                    (419085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                150342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (150589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (150589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (150589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.015)


</TABLE>
No. 11-6020.

#### Luis Mangual, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 808,

181 L. Ed. 2d 519,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8320.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 362, 181 L. Ed. 2d 229, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6803.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N C / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SE RGI O ZAV ALA- CE RVAN TE Z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 30041 D. C . No . C R - 0 6 - 0 0 0 1 6 - R HW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtH . W ha l e y , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S er gi o Z aval a- C ervant ez appeal s f rom the 14 3-m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rd is tr ib u tio n o f

m e th a m p h e ta m in e , in



# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN C/ Res ea r ch 08- 30041 2 v i o l a t i o n o f

2 1 U . S. C. § 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , ( b ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e a f

f i rm. Z aval a- C ervant ez cont ends thathe re ce i ved i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l atse nt enci ng because hi s tri alcoun se l fa i l ed t o adv ocat e f or a 90-m on th sent ence , despi t e havi ng nego t i at ed the ri gh tt o argue for such a s ent ence i n h i s pl ea a gr e e m e nt . W e w i l l nota ddr e s s thi s c l a i m on di r e c tappe a l be c aus e i ti s notone of “th e u n u s u a l c a s e s [ ] ( 1 ) w h e r e th e r e c o r do n ap p e a l is s u f f ic ie n tlyd e v e lo p e dto p erm i td et erm i n at i o n o f th e i ssu e, o r (2 ) w h ere th e l eg al rep resen t at i o n i s so in a d e q u a te th a t it o b v io u s lyd e n ie s ad e f e n d an t h is S ix th A m e n d m e n t r ig h t to c o u n s e l.” Un i te d

Sta tes v . J

e r o n i mo , 3 9 8 F .3 d1 1 4 9 , 1 1 5 5 - 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ; se e a l so U n i ted Sta tes v. B en

f o rd , 57 4 F . 3d 12 28 , 12 31 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 10-8


 


CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRIBUTION
AGREEMENT


 


Visual Entertainment Systems, LLC, an Ohio
limited liability company with a principal place of business at 5125 West 140th Street, Brook Park, OH 44142, acting herein by
Giovanni A. Carriero, its Managing Member, duly authorized, hereby consents to the foregoing assignment and all of the terms and
conditions contained therein.


 


	 	 	Visual Entertainment Systems, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Giovanni A. Carriero, its Managing Member Duly Authorized


 


	STATE OF OHIO	)	 
	 	)	Ss.:  Brook Park
	COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA	)	 


 


On this 28th day of March 2012, before me,
the undersigned officer, personally appeared, Giovanni A. Carriero, who acknowledged himself to be the Managing Member of Visual
Entertainment Systems, LLC, and that he, as such Managing Member, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument
for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the limited liability company by himself as Managing Member.


 


	 	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Notary Public	 
	 	My Commission Expires:	 
	 	Seal:
No. 11M45.

#### Brian Keith Waugh, Petitioner v. Anheuser-Busch Inbev, et al.

565 U.S. 1054, 132 S. Ct. 794,

181 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8577.

November 28, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```

[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]               
[Page 32535]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-166]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity 
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Under Subpart B; Week Ending May 22, 
2010

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under subpart B 
(formerly subpart Q) during the Week Ending May 22, 2010. The following 
Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and 
Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under subpart B (formerly 
subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations 
(See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0126.
    Date Filed: May 18, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: June 8, 2010.
    Description: Application of Carlsbad-Palomar Airlines, Inc. 
requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage 
in scheduled interstate air transportation of persons, property and 
cargo.

 Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-13656 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3210 

To require the Commandant of the Coast Guard to take certain steps to 

improve Coast Guard shore infrastructure, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL (for herself and Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Commandant of the Coast Guard to take 

certain steps to improve Coast Guard shore infrastructure, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coast Guard Shore 

5 Infrastructure Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of 

9 the Coast Guard shall— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3210 IH

1 (1) develop a plan to standardize Coast Guard 

2 facility condition assessments; 

3 (2) establish shore infrastructure performance 

4 goals, measures, and baselines to track the effective5 ness of maintenance and repair investments and pro6 vide feedback on progress made; 

7 (3) develop a process to routinely align the 

8 Coast Guard shore infrastructure portfolio with mis9 sion needs, including disposing of unneeded assets; 

10 (4) establish guidance for planning boards to 

11 document inputs, deliberations, and project 

12 prioritization decisions for infrastructure mainte13 nance projects; 

14 (5) employ models for Coast Guard infrastruc15 ture asset lines for— 

16 (A) predicting the outcome of investments 

17 in shore infrastructure; 

18 (B) analyzing tradeoffs; and 

19 (C) optimizing decisions among competing 

20 investments; 

21 (6) include supporting details about competing 

22 project alternatives and report tradeoffs in congres23 sional budget requests and related reports; and 

24 (7) explore the development of real property 

25 management expertise within the Coast Guard workVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:27 Jun 14, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3210.IH H3210

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3210 IH

1 force, including members of the Senior Executive 

2 Service. 

3 (b) BRIEFING.—Not later than December 31, 2020, 

4 the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall brief the Com5 mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 

6 of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, 

7 Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the status 

8 of the actions required under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
AaronSulkeyGastem‐USAAnalysis:Groundwater orDrinking WaterStandard orGuidance ValueRangeBefore Average RangeAfter Average RangeBefore Average RangeAfter Average2006USGSRange(8wells)RossUticaFlowbackAnalysisArsenic25 ug/l0‐2.1ug/l 0.13125ug/l 0‐3.3ug/l .06ug/l 0‐000‐00 <2ug/l 6.8ug/lBarium1000 ug/l1.8‐120ug/l 53.053ug/l 1.8‐130ug/l 53.215ug/l 0‐24ug/l 7.412ug/l 0‐8.9ug/l 3.437ug/l 15‐1730ug/l 15300ug/lStrontiumNo standard1.8‐630ug/l 244.154ug/l 1.8‐620ug/l 275.09ug/l 16ug/l 16ug/l 12‐33ug/l 19.083ug/l 117‐11600ug/l 34100ug/lSulfate250 mg/I0‐14mg/l 7.638mg/l 0‐16mg/l 6.494mg/l 3.8‐8.5mg/l 5.8mg/l 4.4‐6.8mg/l 5.35mg/l 3.6‐1120mg/l 36.3mg/lMethane10 mg/l0‐6mg/l .5mg/l 0‐5mg/l .35mg/l 0‐000‐0 0 NR NotAnalyzedTotal DissolvedSolids500 mg/l39‐230mg/l 149.538mg/l 39‐220mg/l 150.35mg/l 0‐280mg/l 46.25mg/l 25‐100mg/l 55.833mg/l NR 6460mg/lTotal SuspendedSolidsNo Standard0‐12mg/l 0.857mg/l 0‐6mg/l .375mg/l 0‐73mg/l 25.571mg/l 0‐14mg/l 6.25mg/l NR 88.9mg/lVolatile OrganicCompoundsStandards Vary byCompoundNotDetected NotDetected NotDetected NotDetected 0‐000‐0 0 NRCalciumNo standard7.1‐36mg/l 20.636mg/l 7‐32mg/l 19.74mg/l 3.5‐20mg/l 7.113mg/l 3‐15mg/l 6.971mg/l 13‐254mg/l 489mg/lMagnesiumNo Standard1.7‐8.1mg/l 4.7mg/l 1.7‐8mg/l 4.292mg/l .51‐2.1mg/l 1.1mg/l .73‐2.2mg/l 1.183mg/l 2.38‐162mg/l 22.6mg/lSodium20 mg/l2‐62mg/l 21.06mg/l 1.7‐41mg/l 25.48mg/l .77‐7.3mg/l 2.745mg/l 1.1‐10mg/l 3.17mg/l 7.68‐85.4mg/l 2600mg/lPotaasiumNo standard.27‐.97mg/l .588mg/l .23‐.98mg/l .508mg/l 0‐1mg/l .204mg/l .2‐.95mg/l .444mg/l .43‐2.00mg/l 61.6mg/lIron300 ug/l0‐420ug/l 64.75ug/l 0‐1000ug/l 90.5ug/l 110‐1,600ug/l 661.25ug/l 180‐840ug/l 454.28ug/l <6‐303ug/l 38.1mg/lChromium50 ug/l0‐6.2ug/l .931ug/l 0‐6.7ug/l 1.81ug/l 0‐1.1ug/l .138ug/l 0‐5.9ug/l .842ug/l <.8‐1.5ug/l 4.89ug/lChloride250 mg/l0‐42mg/l 9.313mg/l 1.1‐84mg/l 12.906mg/l 1.5‐2.1mg/l 1.8mg/l 1.6‐21mg/l 6.829mg/l 2.92‐50.6mg/l 5070mg/lLead25 ug/l0‐54ug/l 5.023ug/l 1‐110ug/l 8.63ug/l 0‐0ug/l 0ug/l 0‐0ug/l 0ug/l <.06‐6.19ug/l 6.6ug/lAlkalinityNo Standard20‐180mg/l 94.462mg/l 20‐160mg/l 85.75mg/l 0‐55mg/l 17.125mg/l 14‐48mg/l 27mg/l 115‐344mg/l 295mg/lUTICAVOCFlowbackBromoethane 1.8ug/lChloroethane 1.9ug/l1mg=1,000ugChloromethane 8.0ug/lNR=AnalyseNotRunToulene 74ug/lNOTE: All information is based on Utica Frac jobVOC: Volitile Organic Compounds (EPA 524.2)ResidentialWells SurfaceWaters
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0197]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
27, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Licari, 571-372-0493.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Application for Homeowners 
Assistance; DD Form 1607; OMB Control Number 0704-0463.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 100.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 100.
    Needs and Uses: Homeowners Assistance Program (HAP) is dedicated to 
helping military families and DoD civilians who recently sold their 
homes at a loss. The priority access to the funds will go to survivors 
of those killed during deployment, and those who were wounded, ill or 
injured during deployment.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: November 21, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-28372 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ADEL MONTES AND JESUS 

MONTES,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00166-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013-DCV2524)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the agreed motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order costs of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring 

them, and this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals


Notice of Cases Filed With the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 
Week of June 22 Through June 26, 1998

    During the Week of June 22 through June 26, 1998, the appeals, 
applications, petitions or other requests listed in this Notice were 
filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of 
Energy.
    Any person who will be aggrieved by the DOE action sought in any of 
these cases may file written comments on the application within ten 
days of publication of this Notice or the date of receipt of actual 
notice, whichever occurs first. All such comments shall be filed with 
the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, 
D.C. 20585-0107.

    Dated: July 22, 1998.
George B. Breznay,
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

                                              List of Cases Received by the Office of Hearings and Appeals                                              
                                                         [Week of June 22 through June 29, 1998]                                                        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Date                    Name and location of applicant                Case No.                           Type of submission              
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6/22/98...........................  Personnel Security Hearing..........  VSO-0215                        Request for Hearing Under 10 CFR Part 710. If 
                                                                                                           granted: An individual employed by a         
                                                                                                           contractor of the Department of Energy would 
                                                                                                           receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.     
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 98-20893 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 11-5132.

#### Jeffery Alonzo Simms, Petitioner v. Harry Freeman, et al.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 272,

181 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5799.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 119.