alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases

Published Estimates of LAIV Effectiveness

Lisa Grohskopf

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

February 22, 2023
Update on Published Estimates of LAIV4 Effectiveness: Background

 LAIV4 not recommended in the U.S. for 2016-17 and 2017-18, following 

observation of poor effectiveness against H1N1pdm09 viruses.

 Subsequent studies suggested poor replicative fitness of the LAIV4 H1N1pdm09-

like vaccine virus, which was subsequently updated.

 LAIV4 again a recommended option starting in 2018-19 after discussion of – Combined U.S. individual level patient VE analysis,

– Systematic review of post-2009 US/non-US LAIV VE estimates,

– MedImmune data suggesting better fitness of new H1N1pdm09 vaccine virus.

 LAIV4 use within CDC U.S. VE networks has been low since 2018-19, precluding 

assessment of vaccine-specific VE.

 LAIV VE estimates have been published from non-U.S. observational studies. 

2
Vaccine Effectiveness, %

Published Non-US VE 

Estimates

All influenza viral 

types/subtypes

1. Stuurman et al Vaccine 

2020;38:6455-6463

2. Pebody, Vaccine 38 (2020) 489–4

3. Stuurman et al Vaccine 

2021;39:3964-3973

4. https://webarchive.nationalarchive

s.gov.uk/ukgwa/20220401215804/

https://www.gov.uk/government/s

tatistics/annual-flu-reports

5. https://www.gov.uk/government/s

tatistics/annual-flureports/surveillance-of-influenzaand-other-seasonal-respiratoryviruses-in-winter-2021-to-2022

6. Emborg, Euro Surveill

2022;27:pii=2200278

LAIV4 

IIV4

All vaccines

FIN Finland

UK United Kingdom

DEN Denmark

* Report notes that 92% in 2-6y age group received LAIV4; the remainder offered IIV4.

36

2018-19

36

54

49

53

68

71

45

72

64 63

73

-4 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

FIN (1)

LAIV4

2-6y

FIN (1)

IIV4

6m-6y

UK (2)

LAIV4

2-17y

UK (2)

all vaccines

2-17y

FIN (3)

LAIV4

2-6y

FIN (3)

IIV4

6m-6y

UK (4)

LAIV4

2-17y

UK (5)

LAIV4

2-17y

UK (5)

all vaccines

1-17y

DEN (6)

all

vaccines*

2-6y

non-hosp

DEN (6)

all

vaccines*

2-6y

hosp

2019-20 2021-22
4

For more information, contact CDC

1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)

TTY: 1-888-232-6348 www.cdc.gov

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Photographs and images included in this presentation are licensed solely for CDC/NCIRD online and presentation use. No rights are implied or extended for use in printing or 

any use by other CDC CIOs or any external audiences.
No. 11-6262.

#### Annette Nash, Petitioner v. Neil B. Ptashnink, et al.

565 U.S. 1038, 132 S. Ct. 580,

181 L. Ed. 2d 427,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8106,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6990

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DERRELL LAMONT GILCHRIST , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. ( 8:02

- cr - 00245

- DKC

- 1 )

Submitted : December 11, 2020 Decided: December 15, 2020

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Derrell Lamont Gilchrist , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrell Lamont Gilchrist see ks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion s . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gilchrist has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.44 CWT 0.965 $12.0046

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.6564 LB 3.5 $5.7974

Class I Price $17.8020

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.91 CWT 0.965 $12.4582

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.6427 LB 3.5 $5.7495

Class I Price $18.2076

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.4056)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0349)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0174)

Price change per quart ($0.0087)

Price change per pint ($0.0044)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0033)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0027)

Price change per half pint ($0.0022)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.03)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.02)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: March 3, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present. 

The Acting General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 26, 2009 will be: 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: February 20, 2009. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-3993 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
No. 11-6937.

#### Paul L. Martinez, Petitioner v. Anthony A. DeCesaro, et al.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1013,

181 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 267.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 660.
Exhibit
35.1







Servicer
Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



This
Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2017-3 Servicing Supplement dated as
of July 31, 2017 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM
Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2017-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of
the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”)
and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The
undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.
I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I
                                         have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer
                                         during the preceding period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and its performance
                                         under the Agreement.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
                                         under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has
                                         been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                         |                                             |  |                     
|---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial
    Services, Inc. |                                             | 
|                                         |                                             |  |                     
|By:                                      | /s/
    Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 8, 2019
|                                         | Connie Coffey                               |  |                     
|                                         | Executive Vice President, Corporate         |  |                     
|                                         | Controller and Chief Accounting
    Officer |  |
No. 11-7011.

#### Raul Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Larry Scribner, Warden.

565 U.S. 1121, 132 S. Ct. 1019,

181 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 201.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5934.

#### Rhonda Taylor, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 808,

181 L. Ed. 2d 519,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8434.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 422, 181 L. Ed. 2d 275, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7333.
5 Attachments 

Andy, Idalia –

Attached is the cold startup procedure for the Moss Landing Power Plant.

Note that the facility needs a 6 hour startup window when the steam turbine is cold.

Our plan is to take the revised rule to our Board on August 15 for adoption.

FW: APCD Rule 400 Opacity; EPA Opacity Issue - Gas Turbine Opacity 

Michael Sewell 

to: 

Andrew Steckel, Idalia Perez 

05/02/2012 11:59 AM 

Cc: 

Greg Chee 

Hide Details 

From: Michael Sewell <MSewell@mbuapcd.org>

To: Andrew Steckel/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Idalia Perez/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Greg Chee <GChee@mbuapcd.org>

image001.gif A-200A Unit 1 and 2 COLD Start Up Procedure.pdf

A-200A Unit 1 and 2 COLD Start Up Procedure Attachment A.pdf

A-200A Unit 1 and 2 COLD Start Up Procedure Attachment B.pdf

A-200A Unit 1 and 2 COLD Start Up Procedure Attachment C.pdf
Regards,

Mike Sewell

Air Quality Engineer

MBUAPCD

From: Abbott, Steven [mailto:Steven.Abbott@dynegy.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:45 AM 

To: Michael Sewell 

Cc: Abbott, Steven 

Subject: RE: APCD Rule 400 Opacity; EPA Opacity Issue - Gas Turbine Opacity

 

Mike, 

 

Attached is the cold start procedure and its attachments. 

 

Steven F. Abbott

Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC

Dynegy Oakland, LLC

Senior Environmental Professional

Highway One and Dolan Road

P.O. Box 690

Moss Landing, CA 95039

831-633-6649 Office

831-229-5872 Cell

steven.abbott@dynegy.com

Normal Work Schedule 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM

 

 

 

Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC is an indirect subsidiary of Dynegy Inc.
BRIGADIER GENERAL HENRY G. SKEEN

UNITED STATES ARMY 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twelfth day of December 

1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as DISC’s 15th Commander from February 1983 

to June 1984. General Skeen was the driving force in molding the workforce into a more dedicated 

and professional unit that permitted DLA to move ahead. His innovative approach to increasing 

competition in DISC’s procurement actions resulted in an increase of the competition rate from 

66.5 percent in FY 1983 to 77.8 percent through February of FY 1984 with a savings of $7.7 million. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/skeen.htm 1/27/2016
# WASHOE COUNTY HEALTH DIS TRICT 

# @ OFFI CE OF THE DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER 

### PublicHealth Prevent. P romot e . Pr o tec t.
WASHO E COUNTY D I STR I CT BOARD OF HEALTH CERT I F I CATE OF ADOPT I ON WHEREAS, a need has arisen to prepar e the " Second 10-Year Mainte nance Plan for the Truckee Meadows 8- Hour Carbon Monoxide Attainment Area " ; WHEREAS, thi s matter has been duly noticed and he ard in conformance with applicable admini strative proce dure r e quirements ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that th i s Bo a rd hereby adopts the " Second 10 -Year Maintenance Plan for the Truckee Meadows 8 - Hour Carbon Monoxide Attainm e nt Area " . The Proposed adoption of the " Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan for the Trucke e Meadows 8 - Hour Carbon Monoxide Attainment Area" was duly and regularly introduced , pas se d , and adopted at a regular meeting of the Washoe County District B oard of H e alth , on the motion of Humphreys , seconded by Ratti, on t he 28 1 h d ay of August, 2014, by the follow i ng vote of the Board : AYES: Smith , Hes s, Humphreys , Jardon, Ratti , Silve rman NAYS: None ABSENT : Jung

Kevin Dick District Health Officer

AM Smith Ill Ch a irman

1001 EAST NINTH STREET I P . O
. BOX 11130 , RENO , NEVADA 89520 (775) 328- 2416 FAX (775) 328 -3752 www . washoecounty .us/health WASH OE COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EM PLOYER
No. 11-5526.

#### Christopher Darnell Stratton, Petitioner v. Texas (five judgments).

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 807,

181 L. Ed. 2d 518,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8420.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 324, 181 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6143.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
No. 11-6196.

#### Xavier A. Collins, Petitioner v. Anthony Hedgpeth, Warden.

565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 552,

181 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7934.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------

Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
302  and  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  on Form 10-Q of World Diagnostic, Inc. (the
"Company")  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken
Peters,  President  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  302  and  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1)   the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in  the Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of  the
Company.


Dated:  November  19,  2002

                    /s/Ken  Peters
                    --------------
                    Ken  Peters,  President




<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40827-40828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20521]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 111


Elimination of Mixed BMC/ADC Pallets of Packages of Flats

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published a document in the Federal 
Register of July 10, 1998, concerning revisions to Domestic Mail Manual 
(DMM) sections M020, M041, and M045, eliminating options for mailers to 
place packages and bundles of Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mail (B) 
on mixed BMC pallets. The document contained an incorrect date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Beller, (202) 268-5166.

[[Page 40828]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of July 10, 1998, in FR Doc. 98-
18434, on page 37254, in the first column, correct the Dates caption to 
read:

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 1998.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 98-20521 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 11-6597.

#### Clarence Zacke, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,

181 L. Ed. 2d 434,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8257.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.