alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-94.

#### Southern Union Company, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1057, 132 S. Ct. 756,

181 L. Ed. 2d 479,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8595.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 17.
No. 11-279.

#### Evan Hart, Petitioner v. Family Dental Group, P.C., et al.

565 U.S. 1059, 132 S. Ct. 763,

181 L. Ed. 2d 484,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8640.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 561.
EXHIBIT
32.02








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter WNT
L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.




























By:
            /s/
      Christian AngstadtName:
            Christian
      AngstadtTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer ofDemeter
      Management LLC,general
      partner of the registrantDate:
            November
      12, 2009
Chromium Metal Offering

Item # Location Drums Origin

Unit of Measure................... Pounds Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

November 15, 2022

November 16, 2022

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2023

Basic Ordering Agreement... Chromium Metal Date of Posting...................

Commodity.................................Chromium Metal Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Type Lot #

Totals

Net Weight ST

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

*

All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

68.33 ST 136,670 Lbs

Quantity Offered/Minimum Bid

0260b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 006 45 HOLLAND 10.17 ST 20336 LBs 

0269a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 013B 40 HOLLAND 9.063 ST 18126.8 LBs 

0269b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 013B 40 HOLLAND 9.063 ST 18126.8 LBs 

0335a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0335b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0335c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs

0335d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs
# Box1_Table 1 HCP
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financialofficer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION August 12, 2005 By: /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN         Bruce R. KnooihuizenExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and principal financial officer
(1) Adjusting Price $26.10 CWT

(2) Base Price $25.40 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.70

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0602

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0301

Price change per quart $0.0150

Price change per pint $0.0075

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0056

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0047

Price change per half pint $0.0038

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Oct. 5, 2014
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal  Drive  Suite 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2017-BNK6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2017-BNK6(the “Trust”)

 

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalfNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial MortgageInc. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge andintent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activitiesduring the preceding calendar year between January 1, 2017 and December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: February 6, 2018

 

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,as NCB Special Servicer

 

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name: Karyn Mann

Title: Senior VicePresident
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-211

Lower Tribunal No. 17-22639

________________



### MC Trust, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.



### Solita Cohen De Mishaan, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A.

Sarduy

, Judge.

Philip D. Parrish, P.A., and Philip D. Parrish; Scale Law and Jaime D.

Guttman

, for appellant.

Ross & Girten, and Lauri Waldman Ross and Theresa L. Girten; Raquel A.

Rodriguez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Steven Mishaan (“Steven”), as trustee and on behalf of MC Trust, appeals a

final judgment dismissing with prejudice his action against Solita Cohen de

Mishaan (“Solita”), individually and as trustee of MC Trust, for lack of personal

jurisdiction and, alternatively, on the basis of forum non conveniens. 1 We affirm.

After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined that it did not have

personal jurisdiction over Solita because she is not a resident of Florida and

because Steven failed to meet his burden of establishing that she had the requisite

minimum contacts with the State of Florida or that the alleged actionable tort was

committed in Florida. Upon our review of the evidentiary hearing transcript and

the record on appeal, we agree. See § 48.193(2), Fla. Stat. (2017); § 736.0202(2),

Fla. Stat. (2017); Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais

, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989);

Machtinger v. Inertial Airline Servs., Inc.

, 937 So. 2d 730, 734 (Fla. 3d DCA

2006). 2

Affirmed.

1 Because we affirm the trial court’s order on the basis of lack of personal

jurisdiction, we do not reach the merits of the forum non conveniens issue.

2 We affirm without comment the other issues raised on appeal.

2
No. 11-109.

#### Theodore Dallas, Interim Secretary, Maryland Department of Human Resources, et al., Petitioners v. L. J., et al.

565 U.S. 1058, 132 S. Ct. 757,

181 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8662.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 297.
Opinion filed Dec ember 18, 20 08



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 08 -0 02 90 -CV

____ ____ __ IN TH E MATTE R OF THE E STATE OF WILL IAM PITT RE DU S, DE CEA SED

On App eal from the County Court
P alo P into Coun ty, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 8337

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The trial c ourt g rante d David Elliott’s moti on to dismi ss for lac k of intere st in the estate a nd dismiss ed the will contest a nd application for probate filed by Richard Queen. Quee n filed a notice of a pp e a l. We dis mis s. The trial c ourt signe d its order on July 15, 2 0 0 8

. Quee n filed his motion for new tria l on Aug ust 18, 2008, thirty -four day s after

the date the orde r wa s s i gn ed. Queen filed his notice of appea l on September 29, 2008, seve nty -six day s after the date the order

was sig ned. Upon re ceiving the docke ting state ment and copie s of the orde r, motion fo r n ew t ri al, and notice of a

ppeal, the c lerk of this court wr ote the par ties advising the m that it appear ed the motion fo r n e w tri a l a nd , th e re fo re , th e no tic e of a pp e a l w e re no t ti me ly

fi le d. Th e c le rk dir e c te d Que e n to2

respon d o n o r b e f

o r e N o v e mb e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 , s h o w in g g r o u n d s f o r c o n ti n u in g th e a

p p e a l. T here has been no r esponse to our le tter. Quee n has not timely

perf ecte d an appe al pursuant to T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1. Theref ore, the appea l is dism issed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM

Dec ember

18, 2008 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , a n d

S t r a n g e , J.
Spectrophotometer Measurement Sub-Committee 

November 21, 2013 

Joint Shade IPT 
Members 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

•

•

•

•

•

•

•
Objective 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

To develop a process to establish and use shade standards with 

instrumental spectrophotometer data attributes (L*a*b*) in lieu of 

physical shade standard samples for future procurement of military 

fabrics/items. 

Scope 

The scope for the initial phase will be limited to solid shades. 
Plan 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. Benchmark current programs and establish instrumental 

spectrophotometer shade data values for existing standard samples 

2. Work with the ‘Shade Tolerance Ranges for Solid Colors’ subcommittee to establish associated instrumental tolerances for the 

instrumental standard 

3. Define process for pilot study 

4. Select 12 pilot programs for 3 month evaluation 

5. Review pilot study performance/success and make changes as 

necessary 

6. Apply process to other suitable programs 

7. Apply lessons learned from solids and initiate plan for printed 

patterns 
Deliverables 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. Defined process for electronic instrumental shade standards 
Activities to Date 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. Benchmarked programs using objective shade readings 

a. Wool dress uniforms 

b. Coast Guard ODU 

c. Running shorts 
Protocol for Measurement of Shade Samples 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. AATCC Evaluation Procedure 6 - Instrumental Color Measurement, Section 2 - 

Measurement of Color by Reflectance Methods, should be used as a guideline in 

conjunction with AATCC Test Method 173 CMC: Calculation of Small Color Differences 

for Acceptability. 

2. The samples should be clean and free of lint. 

3. The spectrophotometer should be properly calibrated to manufacturers’ 

specifications prior to taking measurements, using the green tile. 

4. The following parameters should be used for measuring the samples: 

Illuminant: D65 

Area View: Large 

Observer: 10°

Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance 

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF 

Scale: CIELAB 

Samples should be backed with three layers, should be measured three times and averaged. 

5. The samples should be identified as follows: 

Standard (color name) 

Tolerance (descriptor) 

Samples 1-10The absolute L* a* b* values for the standard should be recorded and printed. The 

absolute L* a* b* and the DE cmc 2:1 DL* Da* and Db* for all tolerances and all samples compared 

to the standard should be recorded and printed. 
Activities to Date 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. 

2. Surveyed industry for volunteers to participate in pilot programs 

 Brookwood Companies 

 Galey & Lord, LLC 

 ITG (Burlington) 

 Kenyon Industries 

 Springfield LLC 

 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 
Activities Going Forward 

Spectrophotometer Measurement 

1. Match industry volunteers with Government Programs 

2. Run pilot activities Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2014 

3. Take lessons learned and replicate to other programs 
Spectrophotometer Measurement 

Questions, Comments? 
Spectrophotometer Measurement 

Thank You
No. 11-6761.

#### Franklin Goodwin, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,

181 L. Ed. 2d 407,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7940.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 636.
No. 10-11186.

#### Christopher Mickens, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 871, 132 S. Ct. 226,

181 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6695.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 253.
SHELDON DINGLE 

Is inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of 

November 1999 for his continuous outstanding mission support from 1961 through 1994. He is 

recognized for his many significant contributions to the mission of supplying quality medical 

supplies to the Military Health Services System. His efforts to incorporate commercial practices into 

the technical and quality areas reduced costs and increased efficiency of logistics service to DSCP’s 

medical customers. His efforts in large part enabled the adoption of new business practices in the 

medical area for which DSCP has been recognized over recent years. Mr. Dingle is a true 

professional whose dedication and competence over 33 years of service brought credit to DSCP and 

himself. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/dingle.htm 1/21/2016
Date 4/11/14 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-13-0864 Reviewer: Cinali/SS

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water Ground water (landfill) Consumer Use: DtD 2 Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) Air: fugitive Consumer Use: CEM 3 Dermal Consumer Use: CEM Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4
Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.
2 Down-the-Drain
3 Consumer Exposure Model
4 Probabilistic Dilution Model
5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP:
IGD 1006: ESOHMS AWARENESS & COMPETENCE

A. PURPOSE

This IGD identifies the DLA-SM Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health 

Management System (ESOHMS) training standards requirements of the International 

Organization of Standards (ISO) 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems and 

45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems-Requirements with 

Guidance for Use documents. 

These training requirements are for all DLA-SM personnel and those working on our 

behalf whose responsibilities may create a significant impact on environmental, safety, 

and occupational health (ESOH) aspects, risks, and hazards. The importance and 

planning of ESOHMS training will be detailed in the DLA-SM ESOHMS Training Plan. 

Top Management is responsible for ensuring that applicable personnel receive training 

to achieve an appropriate level of ESOH competence and awareness.

B. PROCESS

1. Competence

DLA Strategic Materials shall:

a. Determine the necessary competence and training needs of workers

affecting and associated with ESOH performance and its ability to fulfil 

ESOH compliance obligations and legal and other requirements.

b. Ensure that workers are competent (including the ability to identify 

hazards) based on appropriate education, training, or experience.

c. Determine training needs associated with ESOH aspects and risks.

d. Where applicable, take actions to acquire and maintain the necessary 

competence, and evaluate the effectiveness of the actions taken, and 

retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.

2. Awareness

Workers shall be made aware of:

a. The ESOHMS Policy Statement and objectives.

b. Worker contributions to the effectiveness of the ESOHMS, including the

benefits of improved/enhanced ESOHMS performance.

c. Implications and potential consequences of not conforming to ESOHMS 

regulatory compliance, legal, and other requirements.

d. Incidents and the outcomes of investigations that are relevant to the

workers.

e. ESOH hazards, risks, environmental aspects/impacts, and actions 

determined that are relevant to the worker and their work.
f. The workers’ ability to remove themselves from work situations that they 

consider present an imminent and serious danger to their life or health, as 

well as the arrangements for protecting them from undue consequences 

for doing so.

C. SUPPORTING ESOHMS DOCUMENTS

1. DLA-SM ESOHMS Policy Statement

2. DLA-SM ESOH Management Plan

“Any reproduction of this document may not reflect the current version. Please refer to 

the ‘I Am The Key’ website for the most current version.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19973]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:31 a.m. on 
Tuesday, July 21, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate and resolution activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, 
Office of Thrift Supervision), Director Julie L. Williams (Acting 
Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Donna Tanoue, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less 
than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the 
meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require 
consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; 
and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by 
authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(10) of 
the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: July 21, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19973 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

ENERGY

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6222

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL NON-DOD CUSTOMERS

SUBJECT: Prices for Aerospace Energy Category Items

 This letter provides the official prices for Aerospace Energy products managed under the 

Defense Working Capital Fund (DWCF) for fiscal year 2023 for forecasted requirements and 

services. The prices published in this letter are intended to remain in effect throughout the 

fiscal year for requirements and services forecasted last year during our budget review, but 

may be subject to change. 

 FY2023 increase in prices are a result of the recovery of prior year losses.

 

 Thank you in advance for your support to help make our mission successful. Support to 

our customers with the highest quality, priority service and lowest prices are our top priority and 

utmost concern. 

 If you have any questions, please contact Rose Mary Hernandez at (210) 780-4900.

 

 RICHARD SNINSKY

Comptroller

 DLA Finance Energy 

Attachment:

Listing of Prices

SNINSKY.RICHAR

D.R.1229018635

Digitally signed by 

SNINSKY.RICHARD.R.1229018635 

Date: 2022.09.28 08:34:38 -04'00'
Group Name Unit_Issue FY23 CRR per Unit

Z1 MMH LB $165.02

ZD MMH (New) LB $88.83

ZE HPH (H70) LB $118.76

ZF N2O4 MON10 LB $138.44

Z2 N2O4 MON3 LB $149.17

ZH N2O4 MON15 LB $77.27

ZJ N2O4 MON25 LB $38.38

Z4 9135008238115 MC $5.08

ZK RP Fuels GL 64.20%

Z6 Other 45.16%

AEROSPACE COST RECOVERY RATE NON-DOD CUSTOMERS

EFFECTIVE 1 OCTOBER 2022