alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11M38.

#### Yong I. Lee, Petitioner v. Central Presbytery of the Korean Presbyterian Church of America.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 542,

181 L. Ed. 2d 344,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7897.

October 31, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 403 Ill. App. 3d 1098, 373 Ill. Dec. 146, 993 N.E.2d 146.
No. 11-5921.

#### Delmas Sexton, Petitioner v. United States (two judgments).

565 U.S. 925, 132 S. Ct. 356,

181 L. Ed. 2d 225,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7074.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
H. R. 3399 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 to include California 

in the program, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NUTRIA ERADICATION. 

The Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 (Public Law 

108–16) is amended— 

(1) in section 2— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Wetlands and 

tidal marshes of the Chesapeake Bay and in Louisiana’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Wetlands, tidal marshes, and agricultural lands’’; 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in Maryland 

and Louisiana’’; and 

(iii) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: 

‘‘(3) Traditional harvest methods to control or eradicate 

nutria have failed. Consequently, marsh loss, loss of public 

and private wetlands, and loss of agricultural lands are accelerating.’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the State of Maryland 

and the State of Louisiana’’ and inserting ‘‘any State that 

has demonstrated the need’’; and 

(2) in section 3— 

(A) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred 

to in this Act as the ‘Secretary’), may provide financial assistance 

to a State, in an amount that is in proportion to the total impacted 

area of such State affected by nutria, that has demonstrated to 

the Secretary sufficient need for a program to implement measures 

to eradicate or control nutria and restore marshland, public and 

private wetlands, and agricultural lands damaged by nutria.’’; 

(B) by striking subsection (b); 

(C) in subsection (d)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the program may’’ 

and inserting ‘‘a State program referred to in subsection (a) may’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘the program 

may’’ and inserting ‘‘a State program referred to in 

subsection (a) may’’; 

(D) in subsection (e), by inserting ‘‘to a State’’ after 

‘‘provided’’; 
H. R. 3399—2 

(E) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and all 

that follows and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000 for each of fiscal 

years 2021 through 2025.’’; and 

(F) by redesignating subsections (c) through (f) as subsections (b) through (e). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 10-11151.

#### Shawn M. Winkler, Petitioner v. Tom Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 805,

181 L. Ed. 2d 516,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8360.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 870, 132 S. Ct. 221, 181 L. Ed. 2d 122, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6574.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Henry Townsend v. Leonard Nolan

Appellate case number: 01-18-00809-CV

Trial court case number: 1105175

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

The Court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal for failure to make financial 

arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record. Appellant filed a motion for rehearing, stating 

that he had paid the fee for the reporter’s record, but the Court did not dismiss the appeal for failure 

to file the reporter’s record. Furthermore, the motion for rehearing was not timely filed, but was 

filed within the 15-day period following the deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.8. We therefore 

construe appellant’s motion for rehearing to include an implied motion for extension of time. See 

Simon v. Dillard’s, Inc., 86 S.W.3d 798, 801 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) 

(applying TEX. R. APP. P. 4.5). 

The Court may deny the motion for rehearing unless appellant presents proof to this Court 

that he has made financial arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record within 10 days of the 

date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _June 18, 2019__
CAPTAIN TERRY R. IRGENS

MSC, U.S. NAVY (RET) 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this eleventh day of July 1996 

for his extraordinary leadership and support as Director of DPSC’s Medical Materiel Directorate – 

and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DPSC – from 1990 to 

1994. Captain Irgens led his Medical Materiel Directorate to refocus and reorganize its efforts to 

surpass all medical sale predictions. He implemented electronic data interchange and Prime Vendor 

into the directorate, which have become synonymous throughout the federal government for 

saving money and improving customer service. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/irgens.htm 1/27/2016
Annual Compliance Statement





Reference is made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2017, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer, Green Loan Services LLC (“Special Servicer”) as successor to KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, NA as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Trustee, Paying Agent and Custodian as the same may have heretofore been and/or may hereafter be assigned, modified, amended and/or restated (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement, Andrew Falk, Senior Vice President of Green Loan does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 (the “ Reporting Period ”) and of its performance under the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision; and


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st day of March 2024.



/s/ Andrew Falk



Andrew Falk

Senior Vice President




---
No. 11-5075.

#### Ernest Lee Vaden, Petitioner v. Mike McDonald, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 266,

181 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5534.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 662.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30,
2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ David R. Asplund

David R. AsplundChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-10-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                               46482
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        97498
<ALLOWANCES>                                          2306
<INVENTORY>                                         121651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    279380
<PP&E>                                               53084
<DEPRECIATION>                                        9233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      448644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               103294
<BONDS>                                             168234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           95203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        448644
<SALES>                                               2274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2274
<CGS>                                                 2174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (574)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1820)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1820)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-6742.

#### Ranferis Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 563,

181 L. Ed. 2d 406,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8015.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 561.
No. 11-6812.

#### George Rivas, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1096, 132 S. Ct. 850,

181 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8976.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 395.
RE: Still waiting for final rule and preamble to be uploaded into ROCIS

Laity, James A. t
o
: Lydia Wegman 06/02/2010 07:33 PM

Cc: Tricia Crabtree

No problem, thanks for the update.

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 7:32 PM To: Laity, James A. Cc: Tricia Crabtree Subject: Re: Still waiting for final rule and preamble to be uploaded into ROCIS

It took a long time to get it ready but it should be uploaded in about 5 minutes. Please let me know when you get it. I'm sorry fopr the delay.

From: "Laity, James A." [James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 06/02/2010 07:28 PM AST To: Lydia Wegman; Charlotte Bertrand; Bridgid Curry Subject: Still waiting for final rule and preamble to be uploaded into ROCIS

Lydia, Looks like final RIA was uploaded over an hour ago, but still no rule and preamble. Do you know how much longer it will be?
No. 11-6581.

#### Jose Luis Mendiola-Ponce, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,

181 L. Ed. 2d 434,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8206.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-270.

#### Robert E. Poles, Petitioner v. Brooklyn Community Housing and Services, et al.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 511,

181 L. Ed. 2d 349,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7828.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3283 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to permit the flag of the United 

States to be flown at half-staff in the event of the death of the Mayor 

of the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to permit the flag 

of the United States to be flown at half-staff in the 

event of the death of the Mayor of the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLYING FLAG OF UNITED STATES AT HALF4 STAFF IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF THE 

5 MAYOR OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

6 Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amend7 ed— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3283 IH

1 (1) in the fourth sentence, by striking ‘‘Govern2 ment and the Governor of a State, territory, or pos3 session,’’ and inserting ‘‘Government, the Governor 

4 of a State, territory, or possession, and the Mayor 

5 of the District of Columbia,’’; and 

6 (2) in the eighth sentence, by striking ‘‘or the 

7 Governor of a State, territory, or possession;’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘, the Governor of a State, territory, or 

9 possession, or the Mayor of the District of Colum10 bia;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the periodic report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Parker Seto, Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
      hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
      States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




Date:November
                19, 2008
              /s/
                Parker
                Seto
                Parker
                  Seto
                Chief
                  Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                  Officer)
No. 11-354.

#### Earl W. Burkholder, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local No. 12, et al.

565 U.S. 1060, 132 S. Ct. 766,

181 L. Ed. 2d 485,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8543.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 360.
May 29 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transporta tion

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Aerodrone, LLC Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual [Docket

No. FAA

- 2015

- 1083 ]

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this offic e represents Aerodrone, LLC regarding the above re ferenced Petition

for Exemption

, in which Aerodrone seeks regulatory relief to allow commercial operation of small

unmanned aerial vehicles. Please accept this letter as confirmation that the Petitioner submitted the

Aerodrone, LLC Motion Picture and UAS Operati ons Manual as a proprietary and confidential document

to 333exemptions@faa.gov on May 29 , 2015.

If you have any other question s, or need any additional information to process this exemption

request, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours,

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKi nnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.871 Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
No. D-2610.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Daniel A. Woolverton.

565 U.S. 1053, 132 S. Ct. 810,

181 L. Ed. 2d 521,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8407.

November 28, 2011.

Daniel A. Woolver-ton, of Lakeland, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Same case below, 255 P.3d 419.
No. 11-7017.

#### Janice R. Smets, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board.

565 U.S. 1071, 132 S. Ct. 799,

181 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8402.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 890.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.22 CWT 0.965 $6.0023

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.2106 LB 3.5 $7.7371

Class I Price $13.7394

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.54 CWT 0.965 $5.3461

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4103 LB 3.5 $8.4361

Class I Price $13.7822

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.0427)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0037)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0018)

Price change per quart ($0.0009)

Price change per pint ($0.0005)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0003)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0003)

Price change per half pint ($0.0002)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Apr. 3, 2016
No. 11-5662.

#### Charles Schwab, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 918, 132 S. Ct. 338,

181 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5938.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 57.
127

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Wisconsin

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $57.5 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 7,900

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 106,200

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $2,663 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $653.3 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $131.1 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $784.4 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 7%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$14.7 $18.4 $2.57 $3.21

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$4.4 $6.4 $0.77 $1.12

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $15.7 $25.2 $2.74 $4.40

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$3.5 $5.0 $0.61 $0.87

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$1.7 $2.5 $0.30 $0.44

TOTAL $40.0 $57.5 $6.99 $10.04

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

TAN 525 STANDARD 57.59 5.67 15.24

1 3928H YELLOW LIMIT 0.12 0.69 0.99 0.89

2 3928M EXTREME THIN 

BLUE LIMIT 2.59 -0.31 -1.29 1.42

3 3928N FULL VIOLET 

LIMIT -0.59 0.51 -0.19 0.80

OLIVE 527 STANDARD 50.90 0.20 20.28

4 3928G EXTREME THIN 

BLUE LIMIT 2.87 0.03 -1.03 1.44

5 3928O FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT 0.29 0.01 1.44 0.88

6 3928Q BLUE-GREEN 

LIMIT 1.47 -0.89 -0.68 1.21

7 3828R FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 1.12 0.27 0.56 0.67

DARK GREEN

528 STANDARD 38.53 -3.58 14.15

8 3928C YELLOW LIMIT 0.00 0.58 0.92 0.97

9 3928K FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT 1.81 -1.55 1.60 1.97

10 3928L FULL GREEN 

LIMIT 2.14 -1.71 0.61 2.04

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3928

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 15, 2023

Fabric Nomenclature EXTREME COLD/WET WEATHER LAYER 6 

JACKET & TROUSER

GL/PD 06-06B

GL/PD 06-17B

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
BROWN 529 STANDARD 37.64 6.41 13.54

11 3928A EXTREME FULL 

ORANGE LIMIT -2.49 0.86 0.70 1.69

12 3928B YELLOW LIMIT -0.43 0.63 0.92 0.86

DARK CREAM

559 STANDARD 61.05 1.86 12.19

3928I

(removed 05/03/23)

FULL BLUE 

LIMIT -1.43 -0.51 -1.88 1.62

LIGHT SAGE

560 STANDARD 53.97 0.78 14.74

3928E

(removed 05/03/23)

THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 2.53 0.15 -1.75 1.67

13 3928F RED LIMIT 0.06 0.52 0.00 0.61

14 3928J THIN ORANGE 

LIMIT 2.77 0.50 0.51 1.39

BARK BROWN

561 STANDARD 26.50 3.78 3.17

15 3928D ORANGE LIMIT 0.07 0.46 1.24 1.54

16 3928P EXTREME FULL 

LIMIT -1.49 0.15 -0.43 1.18

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY