alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF STATE OF FRANKLIN BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,790,196
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     115,866,396
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,804,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 19,857,132
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,987,995
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,517,359
<LOANS>                                     98,476,576
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (748,454)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             144,753,450
<DEPOSITS>                                 122,910,873
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,214,536
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,190,427
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,437,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             144,753,450
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,730,261
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              987,717
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,717,978
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,587,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,831,913
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,886,065
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  119,146
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              12,724
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,463,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                592,647
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     592,647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   394,779
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.87
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               630,324
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,016
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              748,454
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           748,454
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3940 STANDARD 45.61 1.39 12.55

Tolerance

1 3940A THIN LIMIT 48.85 1.52 13.34 3.24 0.13 0.79 1.68

2 3940B YELLOW LIMIT 48.5 1.63 14.41 2.89 0.24 1.86 1.98

3 3940C RED LIMIT 46.41 1.74 13.20 0.80 0.35 0.65 0.73

4 3940D THIN GREEN 

LIMIT 47.62 0.75 13.72 2.01 -0.64 1.17 1.61

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number TAN 499 Piece/Roll Number 3940

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 18, 2021

Fabric Nomenclature OUTER LAYER FOR FLAME RESISTANT 

HOOD, PROTECTIVE, LIGHTWEIGHT GL/PD 08-78B
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT July 18, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature UCP NYCO RIPSTOP

Shade Number DESERT SAND 500 Piece/Roll Number 3729

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3729 Desert Sand 500 63.87 2.81 11.61

Tolerance

1

FULL 

GREEN 

LIMIT -4.63 -0.49 -0.97 2.09

2

RED LIMIT 1.18 0.68 -0.25 1.16

3

THIN 

GREEN 

LIMIT 1.48 -0.61 -0.97 1.17

4 THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 0.91 -0.22 -1.04 0.89

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Trevor Allen, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Jodi L. Mandel and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Michael J. Yavinsky, J.), rendered July 25, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of theft of services, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>;<i> Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 29, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
## EPA Improving Environmental Regulations

Public Meeting Summary March 21, 2011 EPA Region 1 Boston, MA 

### Plenary Summary/Open Comment Period Purpose 

##  “This listening session arises out of a recent executive order for Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review, more formally known as Executive Order 13563, issued by President Obama Opening Presentation. It is intended to be an informal, non - adversarial listening session providing interested p arties with the opportunity to make comments - both orally and in writing comments pursuant to the Executive Order” Regional Administrator Curt Spalding
– Opening remarks attached Matt Hoagland – Moderator – Remarks attached Comments Received During Foc used Comment Period Region 1 did not hold a Focused Comment Period Comments Received During Open Comment Period Transcript Attached Summary of Attendees Excel Spreadsheet Attached Sample Table of Participants Region 1 did not hold any breakout sessions
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-5-2007

Der Weer v. USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-1392

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Der Weer v. USA" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1808.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1808
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-1392

 

GORDON R. DER WEER,

 Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

 

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

D.C. Civil No. 01-cv-00118

District Judge: The Honorable Raymond L. Finch, Chief Judge

 

Argued: December 5, 2006

 

Before: McKEE, BARRY and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges 

(Opinion Filed: January 5, 2007)

 

Renee D. Dowling, Esq. (Argued)

P.O. Box 1047

Christiansted, Saint Croix

USVI, 00821

Counsel for Appellant
2

Ernest F. Batenga, Esq. (Argued)

Office of the United States Attorney

1108 King Street, Suite 201

Christiansted, Saint Croix

USVI, 00820

Counsel for Appellees

 

OPINION

 

BARRY, Circuit Judge

After five years of proceedings before the District Court, the Court dismissed the

complaint of appellant Gordon R. Der Weer. Der Weer concedes that he failed to

properly plead either a Bivens action or a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but argues that

the District Court should not have dismissed his complaint on those “purely technical

grounds” and should have permitted him to file the identical amended complaint the

Court rejected in March 2002. He asks, in the alternative, that we permit him to amend

his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1653 so he can, at this late date, cure what he describes

as his defective allegations of subject matter jurisdiction. 

We have considered the submissions of the parties and have heard oral argument. 

Nothing need be said other than that in November 2002, the District Court granted leave

to Der Weer to file an amended complaint and in January 2003, April 2003, and April

2004, confirmed its intent to accept an amended complaint in proper form. Der Weer

filed nothing. 
3

The order of the District Court will be affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2****Certifications****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Greenfield Pitts, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Emerson Radio Corp.(“annual report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
32

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:July 31, 2007              /s/ Greenfield Pitts   Greefield Pitts   Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to EmersonRadio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
33
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM V. SCOTT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3295 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed March 23, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge. William V. Scott, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Letter from the General Partner extending Mgmt with Aspect Capital Limited



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 
 Nations House — 8th Floor 
 103 Wigmore Street 

London W1U 1QS, U.K. 
 Attention:
Mr. Anthony Todd 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Todd: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	
		 	Jennifer Magro	 	
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ John Wareham
	 	
		 	Print Name: John Wareham	 	

 JM/sr
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, August 14, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19529 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Metallurg Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 ("Form 10-Q"),
filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 11, 2003


                                                      /s/ Heinz C. Schimmelbusch
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Heinz C. Schimmelbusch
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-5325.

#### Lishon Marcelle Hudson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 575,

181 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8130.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 343.
No. 11-6238.

#### Stephen Richards Barker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 519,

181 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7763,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5911.

#### Eric L. Bledsoe, Petitioner v. Tennessee.

565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 422,

181 L. Ed. 2d 275,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7420.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
Ne voyagez PAS lorsque vous êtes malade 

Voici les symptômes de l’Ebola

Fièvre Diarrhée Maux de tête

Vomissements Douleurs 

abdominales

Douleurs 

musculaires

Consultez un médecin si vous présentez un ou plusieurs des symptômes suivants.

Si vous êtes malade, demandez de l’aide

Centres pour le contrôle et la prévention des maladies des États-Unis CS295700-B French
No. 11-5908.

#### Young Bok Song, Petitioner v. Brett M. Gipson, et al.

565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 461,

181 L. Ed. 2d 300,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7541.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 506.
ITRI Exhibit 10.2 First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement






EXHIBIT 10.2




First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement




This First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made the 28th day of March, 2012, between Marcel Regnier (“Executive”) and Itron, Inc. (“Company”).  The parties hereby agree as follows:


Whereas, Executive and Company entered into a Change in Control Agreement on March 5, 2010 (“Agreement”) which provides certain benefits to Executive if there is a “Change in Control” as defined in the Agreement; and


Whereas, Executive may also be entitled to certain termination benefits pursuant to the laws of France pursuant to an employment agreement between Mr. Regnier and Itron Holding France; and


Whereas, the parties wish to confirm that there will be no duplication of termination or severance payments or benefits.


Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Offset.  If there is a Change in Control as defined in the Agreement and Executive's employment is terminated such that Executive would be eligible for the termination payments and benefits pursuant to the Agreement, any severance or termination payments and benefits received by Executive pursuant to (i) French law, or (ii) pursuant to any other agreement Executive has with the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company, shall be offset against any benefits that may be payable to the Executive pursuant to the Agreement.




		
	2.
	Ratification.  Except as set forth in this First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




In witness whereof, the parties have executed and entered into this First Amendment as of the date set forth above.




                            
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	ITRON, INC.

	By:
	/s/ MARCEL REGNIER
	 
	By:
	/s/ JOHN W. HOLLERAN

	 
	Marcel Regnier
	 
	Title:
	John W. Holleran, Sr.V.P. Special Projects and Corporate Secretary
TABLE 3. Percentage of persons aged �65 years who reported receiving influenza or pneumococcal vaccin

poverty status†, education level, and number of physician contacts during the previous 12 months — Nat

Survey, United States, 1997‡ 

Characteristic 

Received influenza vaccine during previous 12 

mos Ever received pneum

Non-Hispanic 

white 

(n=5,481) 

Non-Hispanic 

black 

(n=774) 

Hispanic 

(n=520) 

Non-Hispanic 

white 

(n=5,391) 

Non-Hisp

blac

(n=74

% (95% CI§) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95

Poverty status

 At or above poverty

 level 68.1 (±1.8) 45.8 (±7.0) 58.9 (±8.4) 47.7 (±1.8) 22.0 (±

Below poverty level 55.0 (±4.1) 43.2 (±8.2) 47.2 (±9.8) 37.8 (±4.9) 19.3 (±

Education level

 Less than high 

school 61.4 (±2.6) 45.1 (±5.1) 51.4 (±7.1) 42.8 (±2.6) 20.0 (±

High school

More than high school 

66.3 (±2.6) 39.1 (±9.6) 46.8 (±12.9) 45.9 (±2.6) 21.1 (±

69.8 (±2.4) 46.9 (±7.8) 66.0 (±12.5) 48.6 (±2.7) 31.0 (±

No. physician contacts during previous 12 mos

 None 31.1 (±4.1) ¶ 21.1 (±10.5) 19.6 (±3.9) ¶ 

1 56.9 (±4.3) 33.9 (±15.6) 45.8 (±16.5) 40.0 (±4.1) 18.2 (±2-3 65.9 (±2.9) 43.9 (±9.4) 52.2 (±11.2) 42.9 (±3.1) 16.2 (±

4-9 72.3 (±2.2) 48.3 (±6.7) 53.4 (±9.0) 51.3 (±2.6) 27.8 (±

�10 75.4 (±2.7) 57.6 (±6.9) 74.0 (±10.8) 55.0 (±3.3) 24.9 (±

Total 65.8 (±1.6) 44.8 (±4.3) 52.7 (±5.9) 45.7 (±1.6) 22.2 (±

*Data are presented only for non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics because numbers 

groups
were
too
small
for
meaningful
analysis.
Persons
of
Hispanic
origin
can
be
of
any
race;
howevernon-Hispanic
white
and
non-Hispanic
black
do
not
include
persons
of
Hispanic
origin.
†Poverty
status
is
based
on
family
size,
number
of
children
aged
less than 18
years,
and
family
incomethresholds

from
the
Census
Bureau
are
used
in
these
calculation.
Persons
for
whom
poverty
level
was
nexcluded
from
this

analysis.



‡n=6,972.
 Sample
sizes
might
not
total
6,972
because
persons
with
unknown
vaccination
status
were
ex

§Confidence interval. 95% CIs were calculated by multiplying the standard error by ±1.96. ¶The
standard
of
reliability
is
RSE
less than 0.3
(where
RSE
=
the
ratio
of
the
standard
error
and
theestimate
did

not
meet
that
standard,
or
the
denominator
was
less than 30.


**Meets the standard of reliability; however, <50 respondents were in the denominator.
3 d,- 2 

B 

A 

0.RAW'ING PAGE 1 IS A NON-OIT Al.£0 SKIT CH OR 

PHOTOTIIAT lSUS£0AlONGWJTH PAG£S2AA03 

PRODUCT OATASIICCTS,APPOIDIXA.RMSJON OTO 

BC usm TOCOMPAA.£SI-ID.T£fl. SYSTD.CSAAO 

SUPPORT COMPONGITS f.'OR PROCURD.IOIT BY US 

MJUTARYUS£RS. THEOOCUMENTSWILLBEPOST£0 

f."OR R£Vl�V ON Ttl E 01.AM IL W£BSJTE. 

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: 

DISTRIBUTION FOR THIS DOCUMENT, 

SPECIFICATION AND GRAPHIC ARE 

AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 

4 I

3 � ITAR CATAGORY N/A 2 NON-SENSITIVE 

I 

MANUFACTURER 

TITLE 

PART NUMBER 

APPROVED BY 

SIZE NIA SCALE NIA 

1 

B 

CAGE CODE 

A 

DATE 

WEIGHT NIA PAGE 1 OF 2

Light Set, Tent
LIGHT SET, TENT PRODUCT DATA SHEET 

Specifications as applicable

Bulb Type

EMI Protected Light

Power Consumption (Watts)

Illumination (Unfiltered) fc @ 18”

Illumination (Blackout) fc @ 35"

Length of Light (inches)

Length Including Cord (inches)

Weight (Unpackaged) (lb)

Compliant to MIL-PRF-44259F

Stringable total amount to a 

single line

Special/Additional Features:

APPENDIX A 

Revision D

Company / Cage Code

Manfacturing Source Company

Part Number / NSN
No. 11-112.

#### Minor L. McNeil, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al.

565 U.S. 934, 132 S. Ct. 381,

181 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6578.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.