### 70674 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 95**

**[Docket No. 31048; Amdt. No. 523]**

**IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous Amendments** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This amendment adopts miscellaneous amendments to the required IFR (instrument flight rules) altitudes and changeover points for certain Federal airways, jet routes, or direct routes for which a minimum or maximum en route authorized IFR altitude is prescribed. This regulatory action is needed because of changes occurring in the National Airspace System. These changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace under instrument conditions in the affected areas.

**DATES :**  Effective: 0901 UTC, December 10, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Richard A. Dunham, Flight Procedure Standards Branch (AMCAFS–420), Flight Technologies and Programs Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK. 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK. 73125) telephone: (405) 954–4164.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This amendment to part 95 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) amends, suspends, or revokes IFR altitudes governing the operation of all aircraft in flight over a specified route or any portion of that route, as well as the changeover points (COPs) for Federal airways, jet routes, or direct routes as prescribed in part 95.

The Rule

The specified IFR altitudes, when used in conjunction with the prescribed changeover points for those routes, ensure navigation aid coverage that is adequate for safe flight operations and free of frequency interference. The reasons and circumstances that create the need for this amendment involve matters of flight safety and operational efficiency in the National Airspace System, are related to published aeronautical charts that are essential to the user, and provide for the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. In addition, those various reasons or circumstances require making this amendment effective before the next scheduled charting and publication date of the flight information to assure its timely availability to the user. The effective date of this amendment reflects those considerations. In view of the close and immediate relationship between these regulatory changes and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure before adopting this amendment are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and that good cause exists for making the amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 95

Airspace Navigation (air).
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 6,
2015. John Duncan, Director, Flight Standards Service. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, part 95 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) is amended as follows effective at 0901 UTC, December 10, 2015.

**PART 95 [AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 95 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44719,
44721.

■ 2. Part 95 is amended to read as follows:



### R EVISIONS TO 

### IFR ALTITUDES 

### & C HANGEOVER 

### P OINT [Amendment 523 effective date, December 10, 2015]

From To MEA

**§ 95.6001 Victor Routes–U.S. § 95.6014 VOR Federal Airway V14 Is Amended To Read in Part** 

ERIE, PA VORTAC ....................................................................... DUNKIRK, NY VORTAC ....................... ...................................... #3400 #ERIE R–064 UNUSABLE, USE DUNKIRK R–245

**§ 95.6043 VOR Federal Airway V43 Is Amended To Read in Part**

ERIE, PA VORTAC ....................................................................... U.S. CANADIAN BORDER ..................... ..................................... # #UNUSABLE

**§ 95.6522 VOR Federal Airway V522 Is Amended To Read in Part**

FAILS, OH FIX .............................................................................. ERIE, PA VORTAC ..................... ................................................ # #UNUSABLE

ERIE, PA VORTAC ....................................................................... DUNKIRK, NY VORTAC ....................... ...................................... #3400 #ERIE R–064 UNUSABLE, USE DUNKIRK R–245


### 70675 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

From To MEA MAA

**§ 95.7001 Jet Routes § 95.7513 Jet Route J513 Is Amended To Delete** 

U.S. CANADIAN BORDER .......................................... U.S. CANADIAN BORDER .......................................... #18000 45000#FOR THAT AIRSPACE OVER U.S. TERRITORY U.S. CANADIAN BORDER .......................................... SUDBURY, CA VOR/DME ........................................... #24000 45000#FOR THAT AIRSPACE OVER U.S. TERRITORY.

Airway segment Changeover points From From To Distance

**§ 95.8003 VOR Federal Airway Changeover Point V298 Is Amended To Add Changeover Point** 

SEATTLE, WA VORTAC .............................................. ELLENSBURG, WA VORTAC 47 SEATTLE.

[FR Doc. 2015–28625 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Part 730**

**[Docket No. 140613501–5956–03]**

**RIN 0694–AG13**

**Export Administration Regulations: Removal of Special Comprehensive**  **License Provisions**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; correcting amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) publishes this final rule to amend the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Supplement that lists ‘‘Information Collection Requirements Under the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB Control Numbers’’ to remove certain citations related to Special Comprehensive Licenses listed under Collection number 0607–0152. This final rule is precipitated by an error contained in a final rule published on August 26, 2015 that resulted in the retention of these citations. This action will ensure the accurate and complete implementation of the purposes of the August 26, 2015 final rule: To remove all Special Comprehensive License provisions and related provisions from the EAR.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective November 16, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Thomas Andrukonis, Director, Export Management and Compliance, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, by telephone at (202) 482– 6396 or by email at Thomas.Andrukonis@bis.doc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On August 26, 2015, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published the final rule ‘‘Export Administration Regulations: Removal of Special Comprehensive License Provisions’’ (80 FR 51725), effective September 25, 2015. In that rule, BIS amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by removing the Special Comprehensive License (SCL) provisions and made conforming amendments.

The August 26 rule included amendatory instructions to revise or remove certain Collection numbers in Supplement No. 1 to part 730 (Information Collection Requirements Under the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB Control Numbers). However, the amendatory instruction erroneously identified Collection number ‘‘0607– 0152’’ as Collection number ‘‘0694– 0152,’’ and as a result, the entry for Collection number 0607–0152 was not amended. In this final rule, BIS amends the Supplement by revising Collection number ‘‘0607–0152’’ to remove references to ‘‘§§ 752.7(b) and 752.15(a)’’ under the ‘‘Reference in the EAR’’ Column as originally intended. This correction will ensure the accurate and complete implementation of the purposes of the August 26, 2015 final rule: To remove all the SCL provisions and related provisions from the EAR.

Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001, the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of August 7, 2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015), has continued the Export Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order 13637. Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This rule has been determined to be a not significant regulatory action for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

2. This rule does not contain an information collection subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ). Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined under Executive Order
13132.

4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed