alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IGD 1007: ESOHMS COMMUNICATIONS

A. PURPOSE

This IGD lists DLA-SM priorities and intent regarding internal and external ESOHMS

communications. The organization shall establish, implement, and maintain the 

processes needed for the internal and external communications relevant to the 

ESOHMS in accordance with the International Organization of Standards (ISO) 

14001:2015 and 45001:2018, including determining on what, how, when, and to whom 

to communicate. The DLA-SM ESOHMS applies to all DLA-SM facilities, their 

employees, and all personnel working on behalf of DLA-SM. 

B. PROCESS

DLA-SM will communicate internally among the various levels and functions, among 

contractors and visitors in the workplace, and among other interested parties. DLA-SM 

will consider diversity aspects (e.g. gender, language, culture, literacy, disability) when 

considering communication needs.

DLA-SM will ensure that the views of external interested parties are considered in 

establishing ESOH communication processes; ensure ESOH legal requirements, 

compliance obligations, and other requirements are considered; ensure communicated 

ESOH information is consistent with the ESOHMS and is reliable; and shall respond to 

relevant communications of the ESOHMS.

1. Internal Communication

DLA-SM will:

a. Internally communicate information relevant to the ESOHMS among the 

various levels and functions of the organization, including changes to the 

ESOHMS, as appropriate.

b. Ensure its communication processes enables workers to contribute to 

continual improvement.

2. External Communication

DLA-SM will externally communicate information relevant to the ESOHMS, as 

established by the organization’s communication processes and considering its 

ESOH legal requirements, compliance obligations, and other requirements.

All documented information will be retained and maintained as evidence of ESOHMS

communications, as appropriate.

C. SUPPORTING ESOHMS DOCUMENTS

1. DLA-SM ESOHMS Policy Statement

2. DLA-SM ESOH Management Plan

“Any reproduction of this document may not reflect the current version. Please refer to 

the ‘I Am The Key’ website for the most current version.”
No. 10-11000.

#### Billy J. Battle, Petitioner v. Ohio.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 200,

181 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6465.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Morgan County, denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3126 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include publication of 

written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. DESAULNIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

publication of written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Local News 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF WRITTEN NEWS ARTICLES AS TAX7 EXEMPT PURPOSE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘or for 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3126 IH

1 the publication (including electronic publication) of writ2 ten news articles,’’ after ‘‘animals,’’. 

3 (b) INCOME FROM ADVERTISING NOT UNRELATED

4 BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.—Section 512(a) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(8) SPECIAL RULE APPLICABLE TO NEWS OR8 GANIZATIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 501(c)(3).— 

9 In the case of an organization described in section 

10 501(c)(3) by reason of publication of written news 

11 articles, the term ‘unrelated business taxable income’ 

12 does not include any amount attributable to pay13 ments for advertisements in news publications.’’. 

14 (c) EXPEDITED APPLICATION.—Section 508 of the 

15 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

16 the end the following new subsection: 

17 ‘‘(g) TIMING FOR APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS BY

18 NEWS ORGANIZATIONS.—In the case of an organization 

19 described in section 501(c)(3) by reason of publication of 

20 written news articles, the Secretary shall approve or deny 

21 such organization for recognition of 501(c)(3) status not 

22 later than the date that is 12 months after notice is given 

23 under subsection (a).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3126 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39542-39543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19642]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191


Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas; Meeting of 
Regulatory Negotiation Committee

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Regulatory negotiation committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has established a regulatory negotiation committee to 
develop a proposed rule on accessibility guidelines for newly 
constructed and altered outdoor developed areas covered by the 
Americans With Disabilities Act and the Architectural Barriers Act. 
This document announces the dates, times, and location of the next 
meeting of the committee, which is open to the public.

DATES: The committee will meet on: Tuesday, August 11, 1998, 8:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, August 12, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
Thursday, August 13, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and Friday, August 
14, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The committee will meet at the Loma Linda Community Center, 
1700 Yale, SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Greenwell, Office of Technical 
and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers 
Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC, 
20004-1111. Telephone number (202) 272-5434

[[Page 39543]]

extension 34 (Voice); (202) 272-5449 (TTY). This document is available 
in alternate formats (cassette tape, braille, large print, or computer 
disc) upon request. This document is also available on the Board's web 
site (http://www.access-board.gov/rules/outdoor.htm).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In June 1997, the Access Board established a 
regulatory negotiation committee to develop a proposed rule on 
accessibility guidelines for newly constructed and altered outdoor 
developed areas, including trails, camping and picnic areas, and 
beaches, covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act and the 
Architectural Barriers Act. (62 FR 30546, June 4, 1997). The committee 
will hold its next meeting on the dates and at the location announced 
above. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting site is 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. Individuals with hearing 
impairments who require sign language interpreters should contact Peggy 
Greenwell by August 3, 1998, by calling (202) 272-5434 extension 34 
(voice) or (202) 272-5449 (TTY).
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-19642 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
No. 11-220.

#### Kenneth D. Liggins, Petitioner v. Robina R. Bouffault, et al.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 256,

181 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5249.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 237.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

JOINDER AGREEMENT TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 

July 7, 2014 
 Reference is
hereby made to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2014 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and among Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (the “Issuer”) and the Representatives on behalf of the several
Initial Purchasers concerning registration rights relating to the Issuer’s 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “Securities”). Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Registration Rights Agreement and used herein shall have
the meanings given them in the Registration Rights Agreement. 
 1. Joinder. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that it has received a copy
of the Registration Rights Agreement and absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably acknowledges and agrees with the Initial Purchasers that by its execution and delivery hereof it shall (i) join and become a party to the Registration Rights
Agreement and be deemed to be the Issuer under the Registration Rights Agreement; (ii) be bound by all covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and acknowledgements applicable to such party as set forth in and in accordance with the
terms of the Registration Rights Agreement; and (iii) perform all obligations and duties as required of it as the Issuer in accordance with the Registration Rights Agreement. 

2. Governing Law. This Joinder Agreement and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to this Joinder Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 
 3. Counterparts. This Joinder Agreement may be executed
in any number of counterparts and by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 

4. Amendments. No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Joinder Agreement, nor any consent or approval to any departure therefrom,
shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 
 5. Headings. The headings in this
Joinder Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof. 
 [Signature Page
Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Joinder Agreement as of the date first
written above. 
  

			
	TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael D. Grubbs

	Name:	 	Michael D. Grubbs
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer

 [Signature Page to Registration Rights Joinder (2019 Notes)]
EXHIBIT 10.07


 


COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


 


This Compensation Agreement
is dated as of July 1, 2014 between NewLead Holdings Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (the “Company”), and Troy
LeMichael Francisco (the “Consultant”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has requested the Consultant to provide the Company with certain engineering services in connection with its business (the
“Services”) and the Consultant has agreed to provide the Company with the Services through December 31,
2014; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company wishes to compensate the Consultant through the payment to the Consultant of 1,200,000 shares of its common stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”), with the understanding between the Company and the Consultant that
such shares are expected to have a value of $0.25 per Share.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stated, it is agreed as follows:


 


1.          The Company shall issue 1,200,000
Shares to the Consultant, as consideration for the Services rendered through December 31, 2014. The Company shall register all
1,200,000 Shares on a Form S-8 under this Compensation Agreement. The registration statement shall be filed promptly following
the execution of this Compensation Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Compensation Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the date first above written.


 


	 	CONSULTANT	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ TROY LEMICHAEL FRANCISCO	 
	 	 	Troy LeMichael Francisco	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	The Company: 	 
	 	 	 
	 	NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ MICHAEL ZOLOTAS	 
	 	 	Michael Zolotas	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2
CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Reliability Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Harwell, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ James Harwell
James Harwell
Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 13, 2003

35
No. 11-5977.

#### Nick Bradley Mennick, Petitioner v. Jeff Zmuda, Warden.

565 U.S. 967, 132 S. Ct. 462,

181 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7563.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 564.
Join the DLA Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response Program

In recognition of

 

DLA Civilians can show support by wearing denim. 

Wear your jeans for a purpose! 

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Background: The Denim Day campaign was originally triggered after a ruling by 

the Italian Supreme Court where a rape conviction was overturned because the

justices felt that since the victim was wearing tight jeans she must have helped her 

rapist remove her jeans, thereby implying consent. The following day, the women 

in the Italian Parliament came to work wearing jeans in solidarity with the victim. 

The Italian Supreme Court has since overturned their findings, and there is no 

longer a "denim" defense to the charge of rape.

Recognition of this campaign by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program of the Defense Logistics Agency of 

U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) does not imply or constitute DoD/DLA endorsement of the Peace Over Violence 

Program or DenimDay.org.
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz,
Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Lee Horwitz

Name:	   Lee Horwitz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 14, 2006
# Overview

# Test Case Layout

# FITS Exported TestCases
#### People v Farnham

3d Dept: 136 AD3d 1215 (Albany)

denied 8/24/16 (Pigott, J.)
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-2558 

LT Case No. 23-00942

_____________________________ 

DAVID DOUBROFF, 

Appellant, 

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 

APPEALS COMMISSION, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

Administrative appeal from the Reemployment Assistance 

Appeals Commission. 

David Doubroff, St. Augustine, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

EISNAUGLE, HARRIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
----

----

| 1. | the                amendment  #1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Falcon                Ridge Development Inc., for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon                Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                   |                                    |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                   |
|                                  |                              |                               |
| Dated January                21, 2007 |                                   | /s/ Fred                M. Montano |
|                                       | Fred                M. Montano,        |
|                                       | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

----
No. 10-5371.

#### Manuel Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 819,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9811.

178 L. Ed. 2d 560,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 979 A.2d 630.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2438

SARAH RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENVILLE COUNTY, School District; BRENDA

TURNER; SUSAN B. HILL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-2282-6-20AK)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sarah Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sarah Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order adopting

a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to dismiss her employment action. Because Williams did not file specific objections

to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district

court did not err in adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation

to dismiss her claim as barred by res judicata. See Wells v.

Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v.

Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm

the judgment of the district court. See Williams v. Greenville

Co., No. CA-99-2282-6-20AK (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 22, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 22, 2018

157770(35)

JOSHUA ZACKS,

Plaintiff,

SC: 157770

v COA: 342274

Wayne CC: 16-000653-NI

JEFF ZACKS, d/b/a UNLIMITED 

INSTALLATIONS SERVICES,

Defendant,

and

1101 WASHINGTON, LLC,

Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff- Appellant, v

TOTAL OUTDOOR CORPORATION,

Defendant/Cross-Defendant- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant Jeff Zacks to file an answer 

to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on August 20, 

2018, is accepted for filing.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.17-1 APPENDIX 8.17

AP8.17. APPENDIX 8.17

MATERIEL RELEASE ORDER DENIAL

(WAREHOUSE REFUSAL)

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC A6_.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter RIC as indicated in rp 67-69 of the 

MRO. This is the code of the accountable 

point that originated the MRO.

Media and Status 7 Enter the M&S code as shown in the MRO.

Stock or Part Number 8-221 Enter NSN or part number as shown in the 

MRO.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter U/I as shown in the MRO.

Quantity 25-99 a. Enter quantity denied.

b. For ammunition and ammunition related

items only (items in Federal supply group 

(FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 1427, 

1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 8140), enter an 

M in rp 29 to express in thousands any 

quantity exceeding 99,999. Example:

Express a quantity of 1,950,000 as 1950M 

(1950 in rp 25-28 and an M in rp 29).

Document Number 30-43 Enter document number as shown in the 

MRO.

Suffix 44 Enter the suffix code as shown in the MRO.

Supplementary 45-50 Enter SUPADD as shown in the MRO.

Signal 51 Enter the signal code as shown in the MRO.

Fund 52-532 Enter the fund code as shown in the MRO.

Distribution 54-56 Enter the distribution code as shown in the 

MRO.

1For subsistence transactions, rp 22 and 52-53 shall contain the date packed/expiration date indicator 

code. 2 Ibid
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.17-2 APPENDIX 8.17

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Project 57-59 Enter the project code as shown in the 

MRO.

Priority 60-61 Enter the priority as shown in the MRO.

Required Delivery 62-64 Enter data as shown in the MRO.

Advice 65-66 Enter the advice code as shown in the 

MRO.

Routing Identifier Code 67-69 Enter the RIC identifying the activity 

preparing the denial.

Ownership 70 Enter the ownership code, as applicable.

Supply Condition 71 Enter the supply condition, as applicable.

Management 72 Enter the management code indicating 

reason for denial.

Intra-Service/Agency 73-80 For use with intra-S/A procedures; 

otherwise, leave blank for inter-S/A 

transactions.
# 13 Months