alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge (i) the Form 10-QSB filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III                         
|                      |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                             
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      | 
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Gary M. Adams                                
|                      |  | Gary M. Adams                                    
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
23.1



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-229432) of AgeX Therapeutics,
Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AgeX Therapeutics, Inc., which appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|/s/
    OUM & Co. LLP         | 
|----------------------------- | 
|                              | 
|San
    Francisco, California | 
|March
    30, 2020            |
# NYTS_2011_FORMATS

||
||
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3229 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3229

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit employment of 
 children in tobacco-related agriculture by deeming such employment as 
                        oppressive child labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. McGovern, 
Mr. Pocan, Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Mr. Schiff) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit employment of 
 children in tobacco-related agriculture by deeming such employment as 
                        oppressive child labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children Don't Belong on Tobacco 
Farms Act''.

SEC. 2. TOBACCO-RELATED AGRICULTURE EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN.

    Section 3(l) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
203(l)) is amended--
            (1) in this first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``in any occupation, or (2)'' and 
                inserting ``in any occupation, (2)''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the semicolon the 
                following: ``, or (3) any employee under the age of 
                eighteen years has direct contact with tobacco plants 
                or dried tobacco leaves''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``other than 
        manufacturing and mining'' and inserting ``, other than 
        manufacturing, mining, and tobacco-related agriculture as 
        described in paragraph (3) of the first sentence of this 
        subsection,''.
                                 <all>
```
No. D-2601.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Stephen D. Cramer.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 546,

181 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7758.

October 31, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 564 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 3086, 180 L. Ed. 2d 908, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4988.
null

539.09845
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of
     operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
     consolidated financial statements together with the related footnotes
     thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001066797
<NAME>                        SCOTIA PACIFIC COMPANY LLC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,300
<SECURITIES>                                   16,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,200
<PP&E>                                         27,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          51,600
<BONDS>                                        829,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (391,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   467,600
<SALES>                                        47,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,100
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             32,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,400
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIO MARTINEZ ARIAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

A. JOHAL, Medical Doctor at North Kern 

State Prison; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16128

D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00764-LJO-DLB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Mario Martinez Arias, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the 

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-16128 

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th 

Cir. 2012); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We 

affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Arias’ deliberate indifference claims 

against defendants Dr. Smith and Dr. Shittu because Arias failed to allege facts 

sufficient to show that either Dr. Smith or Dr. Shittu knew of and disregarded an 

excessive risk to Arias’ health. See Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58 

(9th Cir. 2004) (setting forth elements of deliberate indifference; a prison official 

acts with deliberate indifference only if the official knows of and disregards an 

excessive risk to inmate health).

However, dismissal of Arias’ deliberate indifference claim against Dr. Johal

was improper. Arias alleged in his amended complaint that Dr. Johal refused to 

change the dressing or clean his wound and failed to prescribe antibiotics despite 

signs of infection. These allegations are sufficient to state a claim of deliberate 

indifference against Dr. Johal. See id. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment in 

part, and remand for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3340 

To provide a set-aside of funds for Indian populations under the health 

profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 

Security Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. GOMEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide a set-aside of funds for Indian populations under 

the health profession opportunity grant program under 

section 2008 of the Social Security Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Healthcare Ca5 reers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SET-ASIDE OF FUNDS FOR INDIAN POPULATIONS. 

7 Section 2008(c)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1397g(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘15 percent 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3340 IH

1 of which for each fiscal year shall be reserved for grants 

2 to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and Tribal Colleges 

3 and Universities’’ before the period. 

4 SEC. 3. GUARANTEE OF GRANTS FOR INDIAN POPU5 LATIONS. 

6 Section 2008(a)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1397(a)(2)(C)) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(C) GUARANTEE OF GRANTS FOR INDIAN

9 POPULATIONS.—The Secretary shall award at 

10 least 10 grants under this subsection to an eli11 gible entity that is an Indian tribe, a tribal or12 ganization, or a Tribal College or University, to 

13 the extent there are a sufficient number of ap14 plications submitted by such an eligible entity 

15 that meet the requirements of subparagraph 

16 (B).’’. 

17 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

19 on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5935.

#### Jimmy Zavala, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 925, 132 S. Ct. 357,

181 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6883.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6376.

#### Anthony Hopson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 969, 132 S. Ct. 468,

181 L. Ed. 2d 305,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7507.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*306Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 532.
No. 11-6277.

#### Lynette Manspeaker, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 554,

181 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7935.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 60 So. 3d 391.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George E. Kazantzis, President and Chief Operating Officer (president, principal executive officer and principal financial officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 14th day of May, 2008.

/s/ George E. Kazantzis    Name: George E. Kazantzis    Title: President and Chief Operating Officer
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofAugust 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2017-C39 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

WellsFargo Bank,N.A.                                                                                        (logo)Together we’ll go far
II 

Calendar No. 303 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3314 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake 

Havasu City, Arizona, as the ‘‘Lake Havasu City Combat 

Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAKE HAVASU CITY COMBAT VETERANS MEMO4 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard 

7 North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, shall be known and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3314 RS

1 designated as the ‘‘Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans 

2 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lake Havasu City 

7 Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 303 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3314 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. ‘‘Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, as the al Service located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Special Weapons Agency (DSWA); Membership of the Defense 
Special Weapons Agency Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Special Weapons Agency.

ACTION: Notice of membership of the Defense Special Weapons Agency 
Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Defense Special Weapons Agency. 
The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). 
The Performance Review Board shall provide fair and impartial review of 
Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and make 
recommendations regarding performance and performance awards to the 
Director, Defense Special Weapons Agency.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of service for the appointees of the 
DSWA PRB is on or about 28 July 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
D. DIAL-ALFRED, Civilian Personnel Management Division (MPC), (703) 
325-1106, Defense Special Weapons Agency, Alexandria, Virginia 22310-
3398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The names and titles of the members of the 
DSWA PRB are set forth below. All are DSWA officials unless otherwise 
identified:

Dr. George W. Ullrich, Deputy Director
Mr. David G. Freeman, Director, Acquisition Management Office
Mr. Michael K. Evenson, Deputy Director, Operations Directorate
Mr. Timothy X. Morgan, Director, Programs & Budget, Special Operations 
and Low-Intensity Conflict, Office of the Assistant Secretary Office of 
Defense
Mr. James R. Dominy, Associate Director for Comptroller Information 
Systems, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)

    The following DSWA officials will serve as alternate members of the 
DSWA PRB, as appropriate.

Mr. Robert L. Brittigan, General Counsel
Mr. Frederick S. Celec, Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense 
(Nuclear Matters).
Dr. Kent L. Goering, Chief, Hard Target Defeat Program Office
Mr. Richard L. Gullickson, Chief, Simulation and Test Division
Dr. Don A. Linger, Director for Programs
Mr. Clifton B. McFarland, Jr., Director for Weapons Effects
Mr. Vayl S. Oxford, Director for Counterproliferation Programs
Mrs. Joan Ma Pierre, Director for Electronics and Systems
Dr. Michael J. Shore, Chief, Special Programs Office
Mr. Robert C. Webb, Chief, Electronics Technology Division
Dr. Leon A. Wittwer, Chief Weapons Lethality Division

    Dated: July 21, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-19953 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Town of Havana, a Municipal Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error*v. Mary Hodges, Joined by her Husband John C. Hodges, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed January 25, 1926.

*T. L.*Watson, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Francis B. Winthrop*and W. *J. Oven,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.
No. 10-11058.

#### Fatoumata Toure, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 208,

181 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6489.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 345.
No. 11-5385.

#### Robert Donald Maly, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 575,

181 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8208.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.
EXHIBIT 15



The Unitholders of
Regency Centers, L.P. and
the Board of Directors
Regency Centers Corporation

Re:  Registration Statement No. 333-58966

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated July 31, 2001 related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Jacksonville, Florida
August 10, 2001
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:19 AM

To: 'Craig Ranta'

Cc: 'dave@aeryon.com'; Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n - Aeryon Labs Inc. [FAA-2014-0642]

Dear Mr. Craig Ranta:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0642). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

o List the maximum aircraft speed(s) proposed for this operation, please include the airspeed type.

o Your petition references a pre

‐ flight inspection and/or checklist. Describe the process used to determine if the

UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

o Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

o Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

 flight manual (e.g., User Guide,Exhibit 1)

 training program (Exhibit 2)

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to jake.troutman@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 02/19/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
No. 10-10261.

#### Shauntay Jermaine Wheaton, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden.

565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 132,

181 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5722.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 965.