State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 2 

## Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

............................................................................................................................. 4

2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

.......................................................................... 6

2.1 NAAQS C OMPLIANCE 

### N ETWORK



### .............................................................................................................. 6

2.2 S TATE 

### I MPLEMENTATION 

### P LAN 

### (SIP) AND 

### M AINTENANCE 

### A REA 

### N ETWORK



### ....................................................... 6

2.3 S OURCE 

### O RIENTED 

### N ETWORK



### ................................................................................................................... 6

2.4 NC ORE 

### N ETWORK



### ............................................................................................................................... ... 7

2.5 M ETEOROLOGICAL 

### N ETWORK



### ................................................................................................................... 7

2.6 P HOTOCHEMICAL 

### A SSESSMENT 

### M ONITORING 

### S TATIONS 

### (PAMS)

................................................................... 7

2.7 N ATIONAL 

### A IR 

### T OXICS 

### T REND 

### S ITES 

### (NATTS)

............................................................................................. 8

2.8 C HEMICAL 

### S PECIATION 

### N ETWORK 

### (CSN)

.................................................................................................... 8

2.9 C LASS 

### 1 A REA 

### N ETWORK AND 

### IMPROVE P ROGRAM



### ................................................................................... 8

2.10 AIRN OW 

### R EPORTING



### ........................................................................................................................... 9

2.11 U RBAN 

### H AZE 

### N ETWORK



### ........................................................................................................................ 9

2.12 E

‐ BAM N ETWORK OF 

### PM 2.5 

### S PECIAL 

### P URPOSE 

### M ONITORS



### ......................................................................... 9

2.13 A RIZONA 

### / M EXICO 

### B ORDER 

### N ETWORK



### .................................................................................................. 10

3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION

....................................................................................... 11

3.1 S ITE 

### C LOSURES



### ............................................................................................................................... ...... 11

3.2 N EW 

### S ITES 

### P LANNED



### ............................................................................................................................ 11

3.3 N ETWORK 

### C HANGES



### – C URRENT AND 

### P LANNED



### ......................................................................................... 11

4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS

................................................................................................. 17

4.1 PM 2.5 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ........................................................................................ 17

4.2 PM 10 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ......................................................................................... 20

4.3 O 3 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ............................................................................................. 23

4.4 P B 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ............................................................................................. 24State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 3 

### 4.5 SO 2 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ........................................................................................... 25

4.6 NO 2 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### .......................................................................................... 26

4.7 CO M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ............................................................................................ 27

4.8 PAMS M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ....................................................................................... 28

4.9 NC ORE 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ....................................................................................... 30

4.10 SIP M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### .......................................................................................... 31

N OTE 

### : S ITES IN ITALICS ARE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN 

### SIP ; OTHERS MEET THE GENERAL 

### SIP REQUIREMENT THAT

REPRESENTATIVE MONITORING BE CONDUCTED 

### ( NO SPECIFIC MONITORING SITES ARE NAMED IN 

### SIP).

......................... 32

4.11 S OURCE 

### C OMPLIANCE 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................................................. 33

4.12 C LASS 

### 1 V ISIBILITY 

### N ETWORK



### ............................................................................................................... 34

4.13 U RBAN 

### H AZE 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK



### ................................................................................................... 35

4.14 M ETEOROLOGY 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK



### ................................................................................................ 36

5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE

.................................................................................. 39

5.1 T HE 

### Q UALITY 

### S YSTEM



### ........................................................................................................................... 39

5.2 M EASUREMENT 

### Q UALITY 

### C HECKS



### ............................................................................................................ 42

5.3 C ALCULATIONS AND 

### R EPORTING



### .............................................................................................................. 42

5.4.2 S UMMARY OF 

### A UDITS 

### C ONDUCTED BY 

### EPA

........................................................................................... 44

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

............................................................................... 45

APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS

............................................................................................................ 48

APPENDIX C SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES

................................................................................ 59

APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES

................................................................................. 90

APPENDIX E MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CRITERIA POLLUTANTS

............................................ 145

APPENDIX F REQUEST FOR SITING WAIVER........................................................

................................ 149State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a),

requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual monitoring network plan for the year 2013.

This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 2012, as well as

activities ADEQ will undertake through December 2014. However, some changes may occur after the plan is

published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA

monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database

and to AIRNow. In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs.

Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contain the requirements for establishing air quality

surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality.

Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully chosen physical locations referred to

as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:

 State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS)

 National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore)

 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

 National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS)

 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM)

 Urban Haze monitoring sites

 Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)

 AIRNow information sites

 Source

‐ oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry)

 Meteorological sites

This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both

the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E

as follows:

 Appendix A

– Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration

(PSD) Air Monitoring

 Appendix C

– Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology

 Appendix D

– Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

 Appendix E

– Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

The results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are

achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they should

be modified (through termination of existing stations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations,State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 5 monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet

their objectives and data needs. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of

improving the monitoring networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and regulatory

compliant air quality data.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 6 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed

descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The

equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics across the

programs or networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's current and recently closed

monitoring sites including those sites that ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator.

General information about the monitoring programs in which ADEQ participates is described in the following

sections.

2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network

ADEQ’s compliance network consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance

with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO),

nitrogen dioxide (NO

2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO

2 ), ozone (O

3 ), particulate matter (PM

10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb). The

criteria pollutants are measured using instruments designated by EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or

Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS

compliance including the following network and site criteria:

 Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant

 Objectives and spatial scales

 Sampling frequency

 Collocation

 Special NCore

‐ related requirements

 Meteorology

 Probe location and other restrictions within a site

 Periodic performance evaluations

 Quality Assurance

 Data reporting

2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network

ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently in

non ‐ attainment for one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met but on

‐ going

demonstration of maintenance is required. Specific monitoring requirements for each of these areas are

described in their respective SIPs and/or Maintenance Plans.

2.3 Source Oriented Network

Several major point sources in the state are required to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants,

primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , as part of their air quality permit. Some of the monitoring data from these sites are

submitted to AQS. As indicated in the 2012 Network Plan, ADEQ met with Freeport

‐ McMoRan Copper and Gold,

Inc. (FMMI) to discuss the role of Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the Miami Golf Course

PM 10 , Miami Townsite SO 2 , and Miami Jones Ranch SO 2 monitors. ADEQ collocated instruments at these sites toState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 7 meet the PQAO requirements for submittal of these data to AQS. ADEQ installed the PM 10 monitor at the Miami

Golf Course site in fall 2012, and the SO 2 monitors at the Miami Jones Ranch site and Miami Townsite in early

2013. Data are being collected from both the FMMI and ADEQ monitors at these sites for at least one year for

comparability analysis and preparation of the comparative data analysis review for submittal to EPA

2.4 NCore Network

EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a

multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases,

and meteorology. Some of the objectives of the NCore network are:

 Tracking long

‐ term trends of criteria and non

‐ criteria pollutants;

 Support for long

‐ term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;

 Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines;

and, support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem

assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses.

As required by 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. In

addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the

JLG Supersite to test new technologies in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples include advanced

communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity

instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to current CFR requirements.

Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/a mtic/ncore/index.html

2.5 Meteorological Network

ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality

data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for

the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the

NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ added meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites

that were not previously equipped and for which there are adequate facilities to support the meteorological

tower and equipment.

2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules

for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of O 3 , oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total

reactive nitrogen (NOy, speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain

comprehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, ADEQ began

to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of O 3

. The

subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their monitoring networks

in O 3 non

‐ attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for requiring the

collection of additional ambient air pollutants and meteorological data are the widespread non

‐ attainment of

the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 8 operates three PAMS sites to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area: JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley

(type 3), and VEI (meteorological).

EPA assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and consider the possible re

‐ invention of

the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and included PAMS objectives, methods, network

design, and quality assurance. ADEQ participates in the PAMS re

‐ invention process and will continue to follow its

activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network.

2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS)

The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national

scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for

these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can

estimate changes the human exposure risks from the various pollutants. Detection of increased human toxicity

risk can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment

(NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long

‐ term

hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix

metropolitan area.

2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the

chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years,

trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM 2.5

samples collected at select sites throughout the country. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends

Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs

. The network has increased to

around 200 sites nationwide. PM 2.5 speciation monitoring at JLG Supersite includes two CSN PM 2.5 speciation

samplers and two IMPROVE samplers. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the

IMPROVE network and the data are reasonably comparable to the CSN speciation data. In 2009, the URG 3000N

sampler was added at JLG for collecting the carbon sample in lieu of the Met One SuperSASS, which had been

used to collect all three types of filter samples. The laboratory analysis method for carbon samples collected by

the URG also changed. These changes to the CSN program’s monitoring and analytical design were geared

toward more closely matching the carbon analytes from the CSN sampler to those collected via the IMPROVE

network.

2.9 Class 1 Area Network and IMPROVE Program

The rural visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These

parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class 1 areas and were designated based on an

evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, performed by the United

States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests,

which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and to which visual air was an

important resource for the visitor experience. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are

located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally

‐State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 9 operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and

visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 Wilderness areas across the United States.

In addition to the eleven Class 1 sites (two were combined in the past) ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites

identified as Protocol sites. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional details regarding

ADEQ’s Class 1 Visibility and IMPROVE networks.

2.10 AIRNow Reporting

ADEQ provides data to the AIRNow system. Data currently being submitted to AIRNow on a near

‐ real time basis

includes O 3 , continuous PM 10 and PM 2.5 , and SO 2 data. ADEQ will continue to expand efforts for data submission

to AIRNow to support the collection and dissemination of nationwide and consistently provided air quality data

in the Air Quality Index (AQI) format that is being used by local weather forecasters, medical facilities, schools

and the general public to make health

‐ based activity decisions based on the reported local AQI.

2.11 Urban Haze Network

The purpose of the Urban Haze Network is to provide State and Local policy

‐ makers and the public with

information regarding the urban haze levels, track short

‐ term and long

‐ term trends, assess source contributions,

and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. More than a decade of urban visibility

data has been collected for the Phoenix and Tucson area. ADEQ utilizes transmissometers, particulate monitors,

and/or digital camera systems to evaluate urban visibility. Currently, only the Phoenix metropolitan area urban

visibility is monitored. The existing Phoenix area cameras sites were recently upgraded with higher resolution

cameras. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13.

2.12 E

‐ BAM Network of PM 2.5 Special Purpose Monitors

The current network of special purpose continuous particulate monitors (listed in Table 2.12

‐ 1) is composed of

lightweight, portable E

‐ BAM monitors typically in self

‐ contained, environmentally sealed enclosures. They can

be battery or solar powered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. Data are sampled every second

and concentrations are calculated and recorded every minute. E

‐ BAM monitors have been used by many

agencies, particularly in the western United States. They provide continuous, real

‐ time particulate concentration

data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns and wildfire

monitoring. E

‐ BAM instruments are used only as special purpose monitors. They are not classified as FRMs or

FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily in

populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from prescribed burns and wildfires. In 2011 ADEQ configured

the E

‐ BAM monitors to measure PM 2.5 to be consistent with the National Forest Service monitors. Hourly PM 2.5

data from the E

‐ BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx

.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 10 Table 2.12

‐ 1 Current Locations of E

‐ BAM Monitors

Site Name Address

Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Payson Well 204 W. Aero Dr., Payson, AZ 85541

Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301

Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336

Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901

Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936

Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network

ADEQ works with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S.

– Mexico Border Air Monitoring Working Group.

This working group is reviewing the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban

areas along the border and evaluating the adequacy of these networks. The second priority of this group is to

identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities and develop recommendations to

resolve any inadequacies. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and

Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are

expected to develop, such that data are shared across the border and capacity is built to meet the needs of the

air monitoring program objectives.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 11 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION

This section provides a summary of changes to ADEQ's monitoring networks completed since the 2012 Network

Plan submission; as well as changes planned for July 2013 through December 2014. Any occurrence of

unplanned changes due to emerging need, budget constraints, or other circumstances will be documented in

next year’s Air Monitoring Network Plan. Below is a summary of the planned network changes. Details regarding

these changes can be found in Section 4.

3.1 Site Closures

Prescott Valley

– Although monitoring began in 2007, the MSA population does not require PM10 nor PM2.5

monitoring in Prescott Valley. Statistical analysis shows that these monitors are reporting concentrations

significantly below the NAAQS. ADEQ is requesting to close both PM 10 and PM 2.5 monitors at this site at the end

of 2013. See Section 3.5 for statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 58.14(c) (1).

3.2 New Sites Planned

Miami, AZ area SO 2 sites

– ADEQ added SO 2 monitors at existing Freeport

‐ McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc (FMMI)

sites, Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite. These monitors will be concurrently run along side FMMI

monitors until sufficient data is collected so a comparative analysis can be prepared and forwarded to EPA.

3.3 Network Changes

– Current and Planned

Alamo Lake

– This site is currently the background site for the O 3 network. The site is sufficiently remote that it is

being configured to be the designated background site for several pollutants. ADEQ plans to begin operating a

PM 2.5 FEM BAM 1020 at Alamo Lake by January 2014. ADEQ also plans to establish this site as a SO 2 background

site so that data from this site can be used for background emissions in modeling. ADEQ is currently assessing

the availability of trace

‐ level SO 2 for placement at this site.

Bullhead City PM 10 – ADEQ installed a continuous PM 10 TEOM on July 1, 2012 to replace the filter

‐ based Partisol

2000 FRM.

Douglas Red Cross PM 10 and PM 2.5 – ADEQ installed a continuous PM 10 TEOM at the Douglas Red Cross site in

October 2012 to meet the required sampling frequency. It ran concurrently with the Partisol 2000 FRM until it

was removed on January 1, 2013. ADEQ also installed a continuous PM 2.5 FEM BAM 1020 in April 2013, which

ran concurrently with the Partisol 2000 FRM until it was removed in July 1, 2013.

Flagstaff PM 10 and PM 2.5 – The statistical analysis for Flagstaff shows that PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations are

significantly below the NAAQS and the monitors are not required for this area based on MSA population. ADEQ

is requesting to discontinue both the PM 10 and PM 2. monitors at the end of 2013. See Section 3.5 for the

statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR 58.14(c)(1).

Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite SO 2 – ADEQ installed SO 2 analyzers at the Miami Jones Ranch and

Miami Townsite in January 2013 to ensure the data are meeting the AQS quality assurance requirements. FMMI

will continue to operate their SO 2 monitors until a correlation study between the two sets of monitors can beState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 12 made. ADEQ’s data meet the PQAO requirements and will be used for submittal to AQS. ADEQ will prepare a

report in the summer of 2014 comparing and analyzing these data for submittal to EPA for review and

determination regarding the Miami Ridgeline design value and the continued need for collocated monitors at

Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite.

Nogales Post Office PM 2.5 – An FEM BAM 1020 continuous monitor replaced the PM 2.5 1

‐ in

‐ 6 day Partisol 2000

filter

‐ based FRM as the primary monitor in April 2013. The Partisol 2000 FRM is the QA collocated monitor for

the PM 2.5 network. This QA collocated monitor will operate on a 1

‐ in

‐ 6 day sampling schedule. ADEQ will

continue to operate the site’s second PM 2.5 1

‐ in

‐ 6 day Partisol 2000 through December 2013.

Paul Spur Chemical Lime PM 10 – An FEM PM 10 TEOM continuous monitor replaced the PM 10 1

‐ in

‐ 6 day Partisol

2000 filter

‐ based FRM in April 2012.

Payson Well Site PM 10 – Part of the network planning process is to assess the representativeness of the monitors

for sampling ambient air. There have been several structural changes at the Payson Well Site that are limiting

airflow around this monitor. These include construction of new buildings and growth of trees. ADEQ met with

the site manager to define a more suitable location. By January 1, 2014, ADEQ plans to install a single PM 10 FEM

BAM 1020 at Payson Well Site, thereby replacing the collocated Partisol PM 10 FRM monitors. As a result, this site

will no longer be collocated for PM 10, as there is no collocation requirement for PM 10 FEM monitors. ADEQ is

requesting approval by EPA Region 9 in the attached letter for the relocation of the current PM 10 monitoring

location (Lat: 34.2294; Long:

‐ 111.3297) to a parcel 90 meters to the east at location (Lat: 34.2296; Long:

‐

111.3295). The PM 10 monitoring will remain on the same property and better meet the required siting criteria.

The AQS Site ID and Site Name will remain the same. Please see Figure 3.3

‐ 1 and Figure 3.3

‐ 2 below for aerial

photographs of the site relocation schematic.

Figure 3.3

‐ 1 Aerial photograph of current PM 10 monitor location at Payson Well SiteState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 13 Figure 3.3

‐ 2 Google Earth Image of the proposed PM 10 monitor location at Payson Well Site

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory

‐ The PAMS re

‐ engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and

limited use of the Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and wind profiler data. ADEQ has not been able to

calibrate these instruments for a number of years due to the high cost for maintenance and calibrations (re

‐

calibrations estimate is $30,000). ADEQ has discontinued data collection from these instruments, because the

quality assurance requirements cannot be met resulting in unreliable data. Alternatives are being reviewed.

Yuma Supersite PM 2.5 ‐ The PM 2.5 Partisol 2000 FRM was replaced by an FEM BAM 1020 in July 2013. This site is

also designated as the ADEQ Transport site for the PM 2.5 monitoring network.

Table 3.3

‐ 1 Instruments Changes Made from July 2012 thru June 2013

Site Name Monitors Date of

Change Description

Vehicle Emissions

Laboratory RASS and Wind

Profiler 30

‐ Jun

‐ 2012 The RASS and Wind Profiler has been nonoperational for a number of

years due to lack of calibration and cost of maintenance.

Bullhead City PM 10 1

‐ Jul

‐ 2012 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter

‐ based FRM with a continuous FEM TEOM

Douglas Red Cross PM 10 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter

‐ based FRM with a continuous FEM TEOM

Nogales Post

Office PM 10 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter

‐ based FRM with a continuous FEM BAM

1020

– the Partisol will continue to be operated until ADEQ determines

the Partisol is fit for removal

Miami Jones

Ranch SO 2 1

‐ Apr

‐ 2013 Installed ADEQ SO 2 analyzer to meet PQAO requirement for NAAQS

determinations

Miami Townsite SO 2 1

‐ Apr

‐ 2013 Installed ADEQ SO 2 analyzer to meet PQAO requirement for NAAQS

determinationsState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 14 Site Name Monitors Date of

Change Description

Nogales Post

Office PM 2.5 1

‐ Apr

‐ 2013 Replaced Partisol FRM with a continuous FEM BAM 1020

– this monitor is

now the designated primary and operates with a collocated Partisol FRM.

ADEQ will continue to operate the additional Partisol FRM at this site

through December 2013.

Table 3.4

‐ 2 Instruments Changes Planned for July 2013 to December 2014

Site Name Monitors Date of Change Description

Douglas Red Cross PM 2.5 1

‐ Jul

‐ 2013 Replaced Partisol 2000 filter

‐ based FRM with a continuous FEM BAM

1020

Yuma Supersite PM 2.5 1

‐ Jul

‐ 2013 Partisol 2000 FRM was replaced by an FEM BAM 1020. This site is the

PM 2.5 designated Transport site.

Alamo Lake PM 2.5 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2014 An FEM BAM 1020 will be deployed to the site by January 1, 2014. This

is the PM 2.5 designated Background site.

Flagstaff Middle

School PM 10 , PM 2.5 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2014 Monitors will be discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years

of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. System

modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR

58.14(C)(1). See Figure 3.5

‐ 1. A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E

‐ BAM)

will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure

monitoring and reporting to the website. Ozone monitoring will

continue at this site.

Payson Well Site

PM 10 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2014 Currently collocated Partisol FRM PM 10 monitors will be replaced with a

PM 10 FEM BAM 1020. Collocation is not required at this site. Monitoring

to be relocated within site property.

Prescott Valley PM 10 , PM 2.5 1

‐ Jan

‐ 2014 Monitors will be discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years

of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS. System

modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR

58.14(C)(1). See Figure 3.5

‐ 1. A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E

‐ BAM)

will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure

monitoring and reporting to the website.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 15 3.5 Requests for EPA Region 9 Approval to Discontinue Particulate Monitoring at Flagstaff Middle School and

Prescott Valley

In conformance with 40 CFR 58.14(c)(1), ADEQ requests EPA Region 9 Administrator’s approval for the following

network changes:

 The discontinuation of PM 10 SLAMS monitors at the Flagstaff Middle School (AQS ID 04

‐ 005

‐ 1008) and

Prescott Valley (AQS 04

‐ 025

‐ 2002) sites,

 The discontinuation of PM 2.5 SLAMS monitors at the Flagstaff Middle School (AQS ID 04

‐ 005

‐ 1008) and

Prescott Valley (AQS 04

‐ 025

‐ 2002) sites. These monitors are “not specifically required by an attainment

plan or maintenance plan.”

For the PM 10 monitor discontinuations, according to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D Table D

‐ 5, for Flagstaff Middle

School and Prescott Valley, the minimum required number of PM 10 monitors for each city is zero. This is based

on populations (MSA) <250,000 (134,421 and 211,033 respectively) and the ambient PM 10 data showing ambient

concentrations <120 μ g/m 3

, which is 80% of PM 10 NAAQS (150 μ g/m 3 ). The most recent five

‐ year average

maximum ambient concentration is 43.4 μ g/m 3 at Flagstaff and 54.6 μ g/m 3 at Prescott Valley, see Figure 3.5

‐ 1.

For the PM 2.5 monitor discontinuation, according to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D Table D

‐ 5, for Flagstaff Middle

School and Prescott Valley, the minimum required number of PM 2.5 monitors for each city is zero. This is based

on a population (MSA) <500,000 (134,421 and 211,033 respectively) and the most recent three

‐ year design

value <85% of any PM 2.5 NAAQS. Eighty

‐ five percent of the PM 2.5 24

‐ hour NAAQS is 29.75 μ g/m 3 (0.85 x 35

μ g/m 3 ) and eighty

‐ five

‐ percent of the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS is 10.2 μ g/m 3 (0.85 x 12 μ g/m 3 ). Flagstaff Middle

School’s most recent three

‐ year PM 2.5 24

‐ hour design value is 5.2 μ g/m 3 and the three

‐ year PM 2.5 annual design

value is 12 μ g/m 3

. Prescott Valley’s most recent three

‐ year PM 2.5 24

‐ hour design value is 9.0 μ g/m 3 and the

three

‐ year PM 2.5 annual design value is 4.0 μ g/m 3

.

Using the last five

‐ years of certified data and Formula 1 shown below with the appropriate t

‐ value from section

4.1 of the Network Assessment Guidance 2007 document, Table 3.5

‐ 1 shows that these four monitors each have

a probability of less than 10% of exceeding 80% of the applicable NAAQS during the next three years based on

trends, concentrations, and variability observed in the past.

Formula 1

t = 2.132 (4 degrees of freedom)

Where is the average design value for the last 5 years, t is the student’s t value for n

‐ 1 degrees of

freedom at the 90% Upper Confidence Limit, s is the standard deviation of the design values, n is the

number of records (i.e., number of design values), and NAAQS is the standard of interest.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 16 Table 3.5

‐ 1 PM 10 & PM 2.5 Monitor Discontinuance Statistical Support

Site Monitor 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 5

‐ Year

Avg.

Max

Conc. s t n 90%

UCL NAAQS

80%

NAAQS 90%UCL

is <80%

Flagstaff PM 10

Annual Max Conc.

Value 45 47 26 61 38 43.40 12.82 2.132 5 55.6 120 YES

Prescott Valley PM

10

Annual Max Conc.

Value 42.3 59.9 41 90.8 39 54.60 21.90 2.132 5 75.5 120 YES

Flagstaff PM 2.5

24Hr Design Value 18 19 13 14 12 15.20 3.11 2.132 5 18.2 28 YES

Flagstaff PM 2.5

Annual Design

Value 6.8 7.1 6.1 5.9 5.2 6.22 0.75 2.132 5 6.9 9.6 YES

Prescott Valley PM

2.5

24Hr Design Value 12 13 11 10 9 11.00 1.58 2.132 5 12.5 28 YES

Prescott Valley PM

2.5

Annual Design

Value 5.9 5.5 5.0 4.3 4.0 4.94 0.80 2.132 5 5.7 9.6 YESState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 17 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS

The monitoring requirements for the number of sites in the SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are

described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas. Current

minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring

requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas.

Table 4.0

‐ 1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census

Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population

Flagstaff Coconino County 134,421

Lake Havasu City

– Kingman Mohave County 200,186

Phoenix

– Mesa

– Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887

Prescott Yavapai County 211,033

Sierra Vista

‐ Douglas Cochise 131,346

Tucson Pima County 980,263

Yuma Yuma County 195,751

Table 4.0

‐ 2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census

Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population

Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420

Payson Gila 53,597

Safford Graham 37,220

Show Low Navajo 107,449

4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0

‐ 1) and design

values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1

‐ 1).State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 18 Table 4.1

‐ 1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) Most recent 3

‐ Yr design

value ≥ 85% of any PM 2.5

NAAQS * Most recent 3

‐ Yr design

value <85% any PM 2.5

NAAQS *

>1,000,000 3 2

500,000

– <1,000,000 2 1

50,000

– <500,000 1 0

85% Annual NAAQS (12 μ g/m 3 )

= 10.2 μ g/m 3 ; 85% 24

‐ Hour NAAQS (35 μ g/m 3 )

= 29.75 μ g/m 3

The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from

data collected at each FRM (filter

‐ based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1

‐ 2). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1)

states the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day

at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor.

Table 4.1

‐ 2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ FRM/FEM Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2010

‐ 2012

24

‐ Hour Design

Value ( μ g/m 3 ) 2010

‐ 2012

Annual Design

Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Sample

Frequency

04

‐ 003

‐ 1005 Douglas Red Cross 13 6.7 Continuous

04

‐ 005

‐ 1008 Flagstaff Middle

School 12 5.2 1

‐ in

‐ 6 Day

04

‐ 012

‐ 8000 Alamo Lake 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 Continuous

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite 20 8.2 Continuous

04

‐ 023

‐ 0004 Nogales Post Office 28 9.8 Continuous

04

‐ 025

‐ 2002 Prescott Valley 9 4.0 1

‐ in

‐ 6 Day

04

‐ 027

‐ 8011 Yuma Supersite 2 15 7.8 Continuous

1 PM 2.5 monitoring will begin on Jan. 1, 2014 and be designated as the Background site for the PM 2.5 Network

2 Designated Transport site in the PM 2.5 NetworkState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 19 ADEQ currently operates EPA

‐ approved FEM monitors at six PM 2.5 monitoring sites. An additional EPA

‐ approved

FEM monitor will be deployed to the Alamo Lake site in January 2014 and this site will be the designated PM 2.5

Background site in the PM 2.5 monitoring network. Yuma Supersite is designated as the required PM 2.5 Transport

site. ADEQ operates both an EPA

‐ approved FEM continuous monitor and a Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM at the JLG

Supersite fulfilling an NCore requirement. The EPA

‐ approved FEM sampler is designated the primary PM 2.5

monitor for NAAQS compliance purposes.

Several non

‐ FEM continuous PM 2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are

associated with the Smoke Management E

‐ BAM network. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the E

‐ BAM

network.

As previously stated, the FRM monitors at Flagstaff Middle School and Prescott Valley are scheduled to operate

through the end of 2013 and be discontinued. ADEQ evaluated the need for PM 2.5 monitors at Flagstaff Middle

School and Prescott Valley and determined that both monitors can be removed due to the long history of low

concentrations at both sites.

4.1.1 PM 2.5 Collocation Requirements

For the ADEQ PM 2.5 network, one site is required to have collocated monitoring. The Nogales Post Office site has

the highest PM 2.5 design value in ADEQ’s PM 2.5 network and is therefore the designated PM 2.5 collocated site.

ADEQ operates both an EPA

‐ approved FEM continuous instrument and two Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instrument

at the Nogales Post Office site. The FEM BAM 1020 is designated as the primary PM 2.5 monitor for this site

enabling ADEQ to exceed the required 1

‐ in

‐ 3 day monitoring frequency. This combination of instruments also

fulfills the collocation requirement of the PM 2.5 network for ADEQ. The second Partisol 2000 PM2.5 FRM

instrument will operate through December 2013. The QA collocated Partisol PM 2.5 FRM operates on a 1

‐ in

‐ 6 day

monitoring frequency rather than the required 1

‐ in

‐ 12 day monitoring frequency.

Additionally, ADEQ operates one Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instrument and one continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor at

the JLG Supersite. This PM 2.5 FEM is designated the primary instrument as required by NCore. The PM 2.5 FEM

monitor is also labeled as an NCore PM

coarse paired monitor. The PM 2.5 FRM instrument is labeled as a QA

collocated instrument for the site. Table 4.1

‐ 3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 2.5 collocation requirements.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 20 Table 4.1

‐ 3 PM 2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code

(Instrument Type) # of Sites # of Primary

Monitors # of Required

Collocated

Monitors # of Active

Collocated

Monitors

143 (Partisol 2000) 2 0 0 0

170 (Met One BAM 1020) 5 5 1 2

4.1.2 Relocating Any Violating PM 2.5 Monitors

A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is required and described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires

the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of

changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the

creation/change to a community monitoring zone. The analysis includes a description of the proposed use of

spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to

Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any

comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend

to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to

the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ

will utilize the following procedure:

1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant

data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented

in a brief report.

2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan.

3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make

appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation

of the affected site.

4. Relocation of the monitor.

ADEQ does not have any violating PM 2.5 monitors that are being considered for relocation.

4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on the population of the area (see Table 4.2

‐ 1)

and design values for PM 10 24

‐ hour concentrations (see Table 4.2

‐ 2). Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have

delegated authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes

the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 non

‐ attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ

operates a PM

coarse monitor (difference method using paired FEM BAM 1020 instruments) in the Phoenix

metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. JLG Supersite PM 10 concentrations for NCore are provided by

the PM 10 FEM BAM 1020.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 21 Table 4.2

‐ 1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

MSA Population High Concentration

Exceeds 24

‐ Hour

NAAQS by 20% or

more (>180μg/m 3 ) Medium

Concentration

Exceeds 80% of

24

‐ Hour NAAQS

(>120μg/m 3 ) Low Concentration

Less than 80% of

24

‐ Hour NAAQS

(<120 μg/m 3 )

>1,000,000 6

‐ 10 4

‐ 8 2

‐ 4

500,000

– <1,000,000 4

‐ 8 2

‐ 4 1

‐ 2

250,000

– <500,000 3

‐ 4 1

‐ 2 0

‐ 1

100,000

– <250,000 1

‐ 2 0

‐ 1 0

The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12(e) states that for PM 10 sites, “...the minimum monitoring schedule for

the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring

site concentration with respect to the 24

‐ hour standard.” ADEQ has transitioned several PM 10 monitors from

filter

‐ based methods to continuous methods and by January 1, 2014 all the primary PM 10 monitors in the ADEQ

PM 10 network will be continuous methods. Table 4.2

‐ 2 lists the PM 10 network site Design Values and Annual

Means.

Table 4.2

‐ 2 PM 10 Design Values (Est. Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2010

‐ 2012 Average

Estimated Days

PM 10 >150 μ g/m 3

Including Events 2010

– 2012

Average Estimated

Days PM 10 >150 μ g/m 3

Excluding Events 2012 Annual Mean

Concentration

( μ g/m 3 )

04

‐ 003

‐ 0011 Paul Spur Chemical

Lime Plant 0.3 1 0 25.4

04

‐ 003

‐ 1005 Douglas Red Cross 0* 0 31.2

04

‐ 005

‐ 1008 Flagstaff Middle School 0 0 17.3

04

‐ 007

‐ 0008 Payson Well Site 0 0 20.4

04

‐ 007

‐ 1001 Hayden Old Jail 1 0.3 43.2

04

‐ 007

‐ 8000 Miami Golf Course 0* 0* 23.9State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 22 04

‐ 012

‐ 8000 Alamo Lake N/A 2 N/A 2 N/A 2

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite 0 0 34.9

04

‐ 015

‐ 1003 Bullhead City 0.3 1 0 21.8 1

04

‐ 019

‐ 0001 Ajo 1.4

0 33.7

04

‐ 019

‐ 0020 Rillito 2.7*

* 43.6

04

‐ 023

‐ 0004 Nogales Post Office 3.8*

3.8* 36.7

04

‐ 025

‐ 2002 Prescott Valley 0

0 12.5

04

‐ 027

‐ 8011 Yuma Supersite 4.1

0 47.8

* Annual values not meeting completeness criteria; ADEQ monitoring at Miami Golf Course began July 27, 2012

1 Filter

‐ based and continuous records were merged to calculate value

2 Monitoring at Alamo Lake is scheduled to begin Jan. 1, 2014

4.2.1 PM 10 Collocation Requirements

There are no collocation requirements for EPA

‐ approved PM 10 FEM monitors. ADEQ has transitioned the PM 10

network to continuous FEM monitors. ADEQ does operate an additional Partisol 2000 FRM at the Nogales Post

Office site. While the FEM is designated as the primary PM 10 monitor, the Partisol monitor is designated a QA

collocated PM 10 instrument. Table 4.2

‐ 3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 10 collocation requirements.

Table 4.2

‐ 3 PM 10 FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary

Monitors # of Required

Collocated

Monitors # of Active

Collocated

Monitors

126 (Partisol 2000) 5 2* 1* 1 *

079 (TEOM) 8 8 0 0

122 (BAM) 2 2 0 0

* The Partisol 2000 monitors at the Payson Well Site will be replaced with a single FEM BAM 1020 beginning

January 2014State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 23 4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements

Table 4.3

‐ 1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8

‐ hour

Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS

(0.06375 ppm) or no Design

Value available Most recent 3 year 8

‐ hour Design

Value <85% NAAQS (0.06375 ppm)

>10 Million 4 2

4

– <10 Million 3 1

350,000

– <4 Million 2 1

50,000

– <350,000 1 0

The minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown above in Table 4.3

‐ 1. ADEQ operates a network of

seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3

‐ 2). ADEQ is updating the O 3 network with remote

zero/span/precision checks utilizing the Teledyne T703 UV Photometric O 3 Calibrator with Internal Zero Air

Pump and External Zero Air Shut

‐ Off Valve. This will allow Air Monitoring Staff to more efficiently maintain the

O 3 network while minimizing travel time during the O 3 season and avoiding calibration during the peak hours of

the day when O 3 .levels are highest. Additionally, the Counties of Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal also operate O 3

monitors.

Table 4.3

‐ 2 ADEQ O 3 Sites and Design Values

AQS Site ID Site Current Operating

Schedule 2010

‐ 2012

Design Value

(ppm)

04

‐ 005

‐ 1008 Flagstaff Middle School March

‐ October 0.069

04

‐ 007

‐ 0010 Tonto National Monument March

‐ October 0.074

04

‐ 012

‐ 8000 Alamo Lake March

‐ October 0.072

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite January

‐ December 0.076

04

‐ 021

‐ 8001 Queen Valley March

‐ October 0.076

04

‐ 025

‐ 8033 Prescott College AQD March

‐ October 0.069

04

‐ 027

‐ 8011 Yuma Supersite March

‐ October 0.077State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 24 4.3.1 O 3 Season

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), “Deviation from the [January

‐ to

‐ December] O 3

monitoring season must be approved by the EPA Regional Administrator, documented in the annual network

plan, and updated in AQS. Information on how to analyze O 3 data to support a change to the O 3 season in

support of the 8

‐ hour standard for a specific state can be found in reference 8 to this appendix” Reference 8

refers to the Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8

‐ hour Ozone

Standard. In compliance with this document, ADEQ analyzed the most recent six years of O 3 data (2007

‐ 2012 O 3

data from ADEQ sites) to create the chart in Figure 4.3

‐ 1, which is the basis of ADEQ’s request for modifying the

O 3 season to March through October. The only two days in October > 75 ppb occurred in 2009, which included

an unusually high number of exceedance days. The O 3 season was extended in 2012 to include March because

some parts of Arizona begin experiencing low concentrations of O 3 in March. ADEQ does additional monitoring

in the off

‐ season of November

– February for its own purposes; however, those data are not being reported to

the AQS database. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule.

Figure 4.3

‐ 1 Average Number of Days O 3 > 75 ppb all ADEQ Sites Combined

4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ has operated three source

‐ oriented TSP Hi

‐ Vol Pb monitors between the Globe Highway site (collocated)

and the Miami Golf Course site since January 2011. For the NCore

‐ Pb requirement, ADEQ uses the same PM 10

metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes

these samples and on June 1, 2012 received EPA approval for the ICP

‐ MS analysis method for lead in PM 10

. No

changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb

‐ PM 10 data collected at JLG Supersite;

however, parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with these data in AQS. 

### Average (2007-2012) Number of Days-per-Month

Ozone > 75 ppb (all ADEQ Sites)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecDays > 75 ppbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 25 4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements

ADEQ’s Pb network requires only one collocated site. The Globe Highway site located in Hayden, AZ has the

highest design value in the Pb network and is therefore the collocated site. Although ADEQ monitors NCore

‐ Pb

at the JLG Supersite, collocated NCore

‐ Pb sites are determined by the EPA and JLG Supersite is not a designated

NCore

‐ Pb collocated site. Table 4.4

‐ 1 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements.

Table 4.4

‐ 1 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary

Monitors # of Required

Collocated

Monitors # of Active

Collocated

Monitors

191 (Pb

‐ TSP ICP/MS) 2 2 1 1

202 (Pb

‐ PM 10 ICP/MS) 1 1 0 * 0

* Pb

‐ PM 10 monitor is located at an NCore site and does not require collocation

Table 4.4

‐ 2 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2010

‐ 2012 Design

Value (μg/m 3 )

04

‐ 007

‐ 1002 Globe Highway 1 0.27

04

‐ 007

‐ 8000 Miami Golf Course 2 0.06

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite

‐‐ *

* Design Value not available; PM 10 Metals (low

‐ Vol., filter

‐ based) analysis method

approved June 2012

1 Design Value based on 2 years of data, but is valid due to NAAQS violation

2 Design Value based on 2 years of data

4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates a network of five SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also

been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. Sources, ASARCO LLC and Freeport

‐ McMoRan Copper & Gold,

Inc., also operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for permit compliance and to support SIP

requirements. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both companies to ensure that the monitors are operated

under the required quality assurance requirements. For Miami, ADEQ runs the Miami Ridgeline site and recently

added collocated SO 2 monitors at the Miami Townsite and Jones Ranch sites, which FMMI has been monitoring.

For Hayden, ADEQ currently operated a SO 2 monitors at Hayden Old Jail. ADEQ initiated discussions with

ASARCO LLC regarding Globe Highway and Montgomery Ranch on the best means to meet the PQAO

requirements.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 26 Table 4.5

‐ 1 SO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2010

‐ 2012 1

‐ Hour

Design Value (ppb)

04

‐ 007

‐ 0011 Miami Jones Ranch

‐‐ *

04

‐ 007

‐ 0009 Miami Ridgeline 107

04

‐ 007

‐ 0012 Miami Townsite

‐‐ *

04

‐ 007

‐ 1001 Hayden Old Jail 285

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite 6

*Design Value not available; monitoring began February 2013

The SO 2 monitoring requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a Population Weighted Emissions

Index (PWEI) calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor

while CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson

metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO 2

. These

SO 2 monitors are operated by Maricopa County and Pima County respectively. ADEQ installed SO 2 monitors at

Freeport McMoRan’s Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites in February 2013. Data from these monitors will be

reported quarterly to EPA’s AQS database. ADEQ does operate a trace

‐ level SO 2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG

Supersite), as required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D.

4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates only one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO 2 monitor is located at the JLG

Supersite and is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement.

The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA

population and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA

population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near

‐ roadway monitor,

while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near

‐ roadway monitors.

Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 and containing roadway segments with 250,000 or

greater AADT require two near

‐ roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0

‐ 1, two CBSAs within Arizona

(Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) contain populations greater than 500,000, and therefore, require at least one

NO 2 near

‐ roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA exceeds 2.5 million in population; therefore, two near

‐ roadway

monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. Pima and Maricopa Counties will operate the required near

‐ roadway

monitors in Tucson and Phoenix, respectively.

In addition to the near

‐ roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a

requirement for area

‐ wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2

monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix

metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that requires ambient monitoring of NO 2

. TheState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 27 current NO 2 monitors operated by Maricopa and Pima Counties meeting the current monitoring requirements

set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO

x

measurements required by the PAMS program. The NO 2 monitor at JLG Supersite has an annual mean of 18 ppb

and a three

‐ year 1

‐ hour design value of 55 ppb; see Table 4.6

‐ 1.

Table 4.6

‐ 1 NO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2010

‐ 2012

1

‐ Hour Design

Value (ppb) 2012 Annual Mean

(ppb)

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite 55 18.0

4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates only one CO (carbon monoxide) monitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor is located at the

JLG Supersite and has sufficient sensitivity to monitor trace levels. This CO monitor fulfills NCore as well as PAMS

monitoring requirements. Maricopa and Pima counties operate the other required CO monitors within the State

of Arizona. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million population requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58

Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near

‐ road NO 2 monitor. The required

near

‐ roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County. The most recent census data show the

Tucson MSA is below one million and therefore near

‐ road CO monitoring is not required. The Trace

‐ Level CO

(COTL) analyzer that is currently operated by ADEQ exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the

NCore and PAMS network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. Due to the low range at which

the JLG COTL analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution be exercised when utilizing these data for the

purpose of NAAQS compliance. Under most circumstances, the data would be used to determine compliance

with the CO NAAQS. However, due to the consistently low ambient concentrations, the trace

‐ level analyzer’s

operating range is set at 0

‐ 5 ppm, which is the range most frequently measured at JLG. This operating range is

well below the CO NAAQS of 9 ppm, therefore, when/if under certain rare circumstances, the CO concentrations

are > 5 ppm, determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible, because measurement

uncertainty increases and becomes challenging to statistically quantify. Table 4.7

‐ 1 contains the most recent

Design Values for CO at JLG Supersite.

Table 4.7

‐ 1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 2012 CO 1

‐ Hour

Max. Value (ppm) 2012 CO 8

‐ Hour

Max. Value (ppm)

04

‐ 013

‐ 9997 JLG Supersite 2.9 1.8State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 28 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements

Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas

classified as serious, severe, or extreme non

‐ attainment for O 3

. Two sites are required for each area, providing

all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, Carbonyls, NO

x , trace

‐ level

reactive oxides of nitrogen (NO

y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA

shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August.

ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix

‐ Mesa

‐ Scottsdale MSA and a

meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data.

JLG Supersite

– Type 2 PAMS Site

The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. Since the required manual method of eight three

‐ hour

canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned

in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24

‐ hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during

PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re

‐ engineering program are

available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of

instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at

JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8

‐ 1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS, but

because carbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no current plans to discontinue carbonyl

monitoring at JLG Supersite.

Table 4.8

‐ 1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC * June

– August Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs.

Carbonyl * June

– August Multi

‐ port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6th day, 3

– 3 hr samples

(0500

‐ 0800, 0800

‐ 1100, 1100

‐ 1400)

CO Jan

– Dec Trace CO Hourly average

O 3 Jan

– Dec O 3 Analyzer Hourly average

NOx Jan

– Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average

Meteorology Jan

– Dec  Wind speed/direction

 Temperature

 Relative humidity Hourly average

* 24

‐ hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also part of the NATTS program and collected year

‐ round.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 29 Queen Valley

– Type 3 PAMS Site

Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the

photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor

emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include: speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 ,

total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five

‐ Year Network Assessment identified

the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological

measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl

samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8

‐ 2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the

Queen Valley site.

Table 4.8

‐ 2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC June

– August Multi

‐ port sampler Every 6 th day, 24 hrs, and 3

– 3 hr

samples (0500

‐ 0800, 1300

‐ 1600, 1600

‐

1900)

O 3 March

– October O 3 Analyzer Hourly average

NOy June

– August NOy Analyzer Hourly average

Meteorology Jan

– Dec  Wind speed/direction

 Temperature

 Relative humidity Hourly average

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory

– Upper Air Meteorology Site

This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar

radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters),

and relative humidity. The National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport collects barometric

pressure and precipitation measurements. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and a Wind Profiler had

also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights since 1998

until July 2012. The PAMS re

‐ engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and very limited use of

the RASS and Wind Profiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use

– particularly if usable

data is available from other sources. ADEQ considered the high operational cost and very limited data use when

deciding to discontinue its operation. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from

some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 30 Table 4.8

‐ 3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Method Duration

Meteorology Jan

– Dec  Pyranometer (total solar radiation)

 Ultra

‐ violet (UV solar)

 Wind speed/direction

 Temperature

 Relative humidity Hourly average

4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements

EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has

been a multipollutant monitoring site since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs

are supported at this site, including: SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, CSN, and meteorology. The required NCore

parameters are listed in Table 4.9

‐ 1. The required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA

approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver requesting to

substitute NOx monitoring for NOy. The NCore

‐ Pb requirement is being met by using the current PM 10 metals

speciation sampler (PM

10 Partisol 2000) and associated samples. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG

analysis method for PM 10 metals speciation was approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) for the analysis

of Pb. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore

site, the parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated with Pb

‐ PM 10 data in AQS.

Table 4.9

‐ 1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation

Required

Measurement Frequency/Duration Status



### PM 2.5 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, designated primary

PM 2.5 

### FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd

day Thermo Partisol 2000 is current instrument; PM 2.5



### samples collected since 1999

PM 10 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair

PM

coarse 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, difference method

PM 2.5 

### speciation

‐

organic and

elemental carbon,

major ions, and 24 hour average; every 3rd

day Met One SuperSASS with URG module is current

instrument; STN/CSN samples collected since 1999State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 31 

### trace metals

Pb 24 hour average; every 6th

day Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10



### metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP

‐ MS

analysis method as an FEM.

O 3 

### Hourly API Teledyne 400E

CO (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9830T

SO 2 

### (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9850T

NO/NO

2 

### /NOx Hourly Ecotech EC9841

NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC9843

Surface

meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics

temperature/relative humidity probe currently in

operation

4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ, along with other delegated agencies, are responsible for the preparation and submittal of SIPs for non

‐

attainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for

areas not included within Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties or tribal lands. Permitted sources are also

responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit. Some monitoring sites are

specifically named in the area’s SIP; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of

the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10

‐ 1 lists the ADEQ and source

‐ operated monitors used to determine SIP

compliance.

Table 4.10

‐ 1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements

Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites

Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite

Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1

‐ hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument

Phoenix

‐ Apache Junction,

Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8

‐ hr “Basic” Non

‐ attainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite

, Queen Valley, Tonto

National Monument

Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Non

‐ attainment Ajo

Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office)

Douglas

‐ Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Non

‐ attainment Douglas Red Cross

, Paul Spur Chemical Lime PlantState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 32 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites

Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail

Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Non

‐ attainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami

Ridgeline

Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office

Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site

Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal

(Apache Junction portion)

Phoenix (Salt River Area) PM 10 Serious Non

‐ attainment JLG Supersite

Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Non

‐ attainment Rillito

Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Non

‐ attainment Yuma Supersite

Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Non

‐ attainment Nogales Post Office

Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Non

‐ attainment

– Primary ADEQ (SO

2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail

ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]):

Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden

Old Jail, Hayden Junction

Miami, Gila SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline

Freeport McMoRan (SO

2 , MET) Miami Jones Ranch,

Miami Townsite

Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

Regional Haze, 12 Class 1

areas Visibility

Impairing

pollutants

(VOC,

NOx, SO 2 ,

PM 10 ,

PM 2.5 ,

PM 2.5

species) Statewide

– IMPROVE

monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe

National Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley,

Saguaro West National Monument, Meadview

NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer

Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon

‐ Indian

Gardens, Grand Canyon

‐ Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone,

Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant

Valley Ranger Station, Saguaro National Park

‐ East,

Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument

Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP ; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative

monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites are named in SIP).State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 33 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ requires select major and minor point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected

pollutants in and around their facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD)

monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit

or timeframe specified therein. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of instruments

at some of these sites and review of ambient monitoring data submitted according to the permit requirements.

Sources are required to review and validate their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with

the data. Table 4.11

‐ 1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources.

Any data submitted to AQS needs to be performed by a Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) that

meets all the quality assurance requirements. Data from the ASARCO and FMMI monitors are being submitted

to AQS to use for regulatory decisions. In spring 2012, ADEQ send letters to ASARCO and FMMI discussion the

PQAO requirements and suggesting that they meet with ADEQ to discuss options. FMMI representatives met

with ADEQ, and in January 2013, ADEQ collocated monitors at the existing FMMI’s Miami Jones Ranch and

Miami Townsite sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to discuss similar changes.

Except for potential changes to the Miami and Hayden area networks noted above, the only other change in the

source compliance monitoring network includes the discontinuation of source operated PM 10 monitors in Rillito.

ADEQ has operated a continuous PM 10 TEOM in Rillito for several years; therefore, PM 10 monitoring conducted

by the source was determined to be redundant and unnecessary.

Table 4.11

‐ 1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network

Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

Globe Highway Winkelman SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Hayden

– Garfield Ave. Hayden SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Montgomery Ranch Hayden SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO 2 No

Hayden Old Jail 1 Hayden SO 2 No

Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No

Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon PM 10 , PM 2.5

mass and

ammonium

speciation,

Meteorology No

Miami Ridgeline Miami PM 10 mass and

metals Yes (PM

10 mass only)State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 34 Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

speciation

Miami Golf Course Miami PM 10 mass and

metals

speciation,

collocated Yes (PM

10 mass only)

Miami Jones Ranch 1 Miami SO 2 No

Miami Townsite 1 Miami SO 2 No

PCC

– Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PM 10 mass and

metals

speciation,

Meteorology No

PCC

– Clarkdale SE Clarkdale PM 10 mass and

metals

speciation,

Meteorology No

Carlota Mine

– Sanctuary Globe PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology No

1 ADEQ also operates an SO 2 monitor at this site. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not.

4.12 Class 1 Visibility Network

As stated previously, visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness

areas called Class 1 areas based on designations made by the 1977 CAA Amendments. The evaluations,

performed by the USFS and NPS, reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were:

designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and had visual air quality as an

important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona.

For the Class 1 areas designations, EPA initiated a nationally operated monitoring network in 1987, called the

Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of this network is

to characterize broad regional trends in visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1

areas across the United States. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites

at Class 1 areas. During 1999

‐ 2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima County, and

federal land managers at Arizona's Class 1 areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in

Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12

‐ 1. In addition to the Class 1 IMPROVE monitors listed in

Table 4.12

‐ 1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and two collocated

IMPROVE monitors at the JLG Supersite. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has beenState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 35 used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve

multiple objectives. In 2012, a review of the data from the Douglas Red Cross site was prepared by Air Resource

Specialists and provided to ADEQ. These data will be used to evaluate if this site should be continued or if it

could be better utilized at another location. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spatial representation of

the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class 1 areas within the state of Arizona.

Table 4.12

‐ 1 2012 Arizona Class 1 Visibility Monitoring Network

Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location

Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument

Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua

Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station

Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens

Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone

Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant

Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest

Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit

Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station

Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley

Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond)

4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban haze by conducting studies during the winter of 1989

‐ 90 in

Phoenix and during the winter of 1992

‐ 93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long

‐ term, year

‐ round

monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson.

Executive Order 2000

‐ 3 directed by the Governor’s Brown Cloud Summit was to establish options for a visibility

standard or other method to track progress in improving visibility in the Phoenix area. The Summit concluded

that a daily visibility index for the metropolitan area should have its characteristics defined through a public

survey process. This process called for a representative cross

‐ section of residents of Area A (as described in

House Bill 2538

, roughly the Phoenix metropolitan area), to determine what visual air qualities are desirable,

what visual range is acceptable, and how often the combination of acceptable visual range and air quality is

preferred. Through a series of meetings in 2002 and early 2003, ADEQ and the Visibility Index Oversight

Committee designed the visibility survey, selected a contractor to conduct the survey, oversaw the completion

of the field portion of the survey, and defined a recommended visibility index. The Visibility Index Oversight

Committee Final Report was issued in early 2003 summarizing the visibility index.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 36 Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, and digital

camera systems. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction

along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, and

five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area.

The Tucson urban haze network was shutdown in September 2010. In early 2011, a draft summary report was

written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The

report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the

form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network.

Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze

Network.

The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13

‐ 1. ADEQ continues to

evaluate the Urban Haze program. The high

‐ resolution images from these cameras can be viewed online at

http://www.phoenixvis.net

.

Table 4.13

‐ 1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

Site Name Parameter(s) Measured

Phoenix Network – Operational

ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera

Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera

Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

Estrella Mountain Community College High Resolution Digital Cameras

JLG Supersite IMPROVE

North Mountain Summit 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras

Phoenix Transmissometer

(Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Transmissometer (Bext)

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

4.14 Meteorology Monitoring NetworkState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 37 ADEQ operates meteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network; see Table 4.14

‐ 1. Some sites

were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near

ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five

‐ Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun

to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all

sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Currently, Ajo

and Douglas Red Cross are the only meteorological sites that do not have the full suite of meteorological

instruments. A temperature and/or RH probe may be added to these sites within the next year to compliment

the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction.

Except for the items mentioned above ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the

meteorological network, but may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources

permit. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to

EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database,

ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network

can be found in Appendix B.

Table 4.14

‐ 1 Meteorology Monitoring Network

Site Temp. Temp.

Lapse

Rate

System Relative

Humidity Wind Total

Horizontal

Solar

Radiation Ultraviolet

Solar

Radiation Report to

AQS Comments

Ajo X No

Douglas Red

Cross X X X No

Globe

Highway X X X No

Hayden Old

Jail X X X No

JLG

Supersite X X X Yes For NCore /

PAMS

support

Miami Golf

Course X X X No

Nogales Post

Office X X X No

Paul Spur

Chemical X X X NoState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 38 Site Temp. Temp.

Lapse

Rate

System Relative

Humidity Wind Total

Horizontal

Solar

Radiation Ultraviolet

Solar

Radiation Report to

AQS Comments

Lime Plant

Payson Well

Site X X X No

Queen

Valley X X X Yes For PAMS

support

Rillito X X X No

Vehicle

Emissions

Laboratory X X X X X X Solar

only For PAMS

support

Yuma

Supersite X X X NoState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 39 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE

All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty or error. The total measure of

uncertainty is the sum of measurement and population uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty relates to how

accurately a pollutant’s concentration was measured, or sampled, and occurs during the data collection process.

Population uncertainty relates to how well the measurements of a pollutant from a particular air monitoring

station represent the population deemed at risk. Measurement uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by

adhering to stringent operating requirements established by the EPA, or in

‐ house by ADEQ, for each specific air

monitoring network. Population uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by establishing monitoring sites at the

best possible location to achieve the monitoring objective.

5.1 The Quality System

To ensure high quality data are produced, ADEQ maintains a quality system as required by EPA. EPA specifies the

quality assurance (QA) requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix

A. Components of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality system include, but are not limited to, the use of:

 Quality assurance program/project plans (QAPP) with supporting standard operating procedures,

 Data quality objectives (DQOs) and/or data quality indicators (DQIs) that specify the amount of tolerable

error and establish the precision, bias and completeness requirements for the data,

 Measurement quality objectives (MQO) and associated quality control (QC) checks on air monitoring

instruments,

 Data quality assessments that provide statistical evaluation of data collected and certified annually for the

specific purpose of each air monitoring station or network,

 A variety of regularly occurring audits, or assessments, for technical and/or management systems, and

 Data validation and reporting requirements that keep data comparable with other air monitoring

organizations’ networks.

ADEQ is the primary quality assurance organization (PQAO) for the criteria pollutant air monitors operating at

ADEQ’s SLAMS and SPM network stations unless otherwise noted. The precision and bias results from QC checks

such as verifications, performance evaluation (PE) audits, and national performance evaluation program audits

apply to ADEQ’s data only. Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal Counties are each designated as a PQAO by EPA Region 9

for the data they produce and the Tribal monitoring organizations work with EPA directly to establish PQAO

designations for data produced on Tribal Land. ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring

instruments to assess how well they achieve established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual

agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions,

and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks

performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement

process, which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation

from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in

‐ house PE audits.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 40 The measurement uncertainty among ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be

reasonably homogeneous because such stations operate under a set of common factors needed to effectively

operate as a PQAO. Common factors typically include:

 Stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field

standard operating procedures (SOPs),

 Common calibration facilities and standards,

 Use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPP),

 Oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and

 Support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters.

5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff

The AAS QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is composed of

two full

‐ time employees dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA

team. The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA

requirements are met. The QA Team primarily interacts with personnel from the AMU, which includes the Air

Filter Laboratory (AFL). Detailed information on the QA Team’s activities is documented via an Annual Audit

Report. The QA Team responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

 Coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program or Project Plans

(QAPPs). QAPPs are supported by SOPs that define how to operate air monitoring instruments, handle

and process samples, and manage data. Two variations of QAPPs apply to ADEQ:

o Program plans, which describe the air monitoring networks that are essentially “permanent”

with no known end dates and are associated with data used for NAAQS compliance or for other

national programs with specialized purposes, and

o Project Plans, which describe the air monitoring stations or networks that are limited in scope

and duration and are usually operated for special projects

 Reviewing documents such as chain

‐ of

‐ custody forms, air sample records, and various instrument

performance reports that relate to DQOs and/or MQOs.

 Managing the field audit program, which include conducting PE audits and coordinating with the EPA

national performance evaluation program auditors for PM 2.5 , Pb, and gaseous monitors,

 Conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) on ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services,

and

 Monitoring third

‐ party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA or other government

agencies such as the Arizona Department of Health Services.

5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents

The Quality Management Plan

ADEQ has an agency

‐ level Quality Management Plan (QMP), managed by the ADEQ Safety and Quality

Management Specialist, who report to the Office of Administrative Counsel in the Administrative ServicesState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 41 Division

. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. The

Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator approved this version in November 2010. The QMP describes the

management processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality system that supports programs involving

environmental data and technology. The QMP is an “umbrella” document that details, in broad terms, the

strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities conducted by ADEQ.

The Quality Assurance Program/Project Plans

Per EPA Region 9 guidance, a draft comprehensive program plan was submitted to EPA Region 9 in November

2001, but this document was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring

programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual program plans, which provide more

details for each major air monitoring program, or network. ADEQ develops project plans as needed for special

studies, but these plans do not necessarily have to be submitted to EPA Region 9 for approval. Project plans may

involve single or multi

‐ pollutant monitoring and they may refer to the appropriate program plan(s) for the

pollutant(s) being measured to reduce duplication of effort. In 2013, personnel within the AAS are diligently

working to meet EPA’s requirement of all program QAPPs updated or developed and approved by EPA Region 9

as soon as possible. EPA requires that QAPPs be updated every five years.

ADEQ developed an Interim Final Pb QAPP that was approved by EPA Region 9 in October 2011 and the Final Pb

QAPP was completed and approved by Region 9 in January 2013.

ADEQ submitted a Final PM QAPP to Region 9 in June 2013 and Region 9 approved this QAPP in August 2013.

ADEQ plans on adding any supplemental PM speciation air monitoring information as an addendum in 2014.

In 2013, ADEQ plans to produce individual gaseous pollutant network QAPPs for SO 2 , O 3 , NO 2 , and CO. We

anticipate that producing a smaller QAPP for each gaseous network will be more expedient than trying to

develop a comprehensive gaseous pollutant network QAPP.

EPA Region 9 approved the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, (Urban) Air Toxics Monitoring Program, &

Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (NATTS/ATMP/PAMS) QAPP in February 2008. This QAPP is

scheduled for update and submittal in 2013 and will include the QA/QC for the meteorological network.

ADEQ plans to use the pollutant

‐ specific QAPPs for each parameter measured at its NCore station.

The EPA produces a QAPP for the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) PM 2.5 monitoring program. In 2010, the

QA Lead at EPA OAQPS updated the 2001 version of the speciation trends network QAPP with input from the air

monitoring community. The draft of this QAPP was made available to the air monitoring community at Research

Triangle Institute’s (RTI) website and is also saved on ADEQ’s shared drive with other program QAPPs. ADEQ

follows the EPA QAPP for operating this network; however, any specific information regarding how ADEQ

operates the two Met One samplers used for collecting these filter samples will be provided in ADEQ’s technical

SOPs and addendums added to the PM QAPP regarding any specifics for this EDO.

Air Monitoring SOPs for ambient air monitors are either stored at monitoring sites with storage capability or in

the AMU technician’s service vehicle. Air Assessment Section SOPs are scheduled for update annually and followState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 42 the format provided by EPA in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G

‐ 6

.

SOPs are submitted for EPA Region 9 review with their relevant QAPP.

The Document Control System

In 2012, the DM&QA Unit produced two new administrative SOPs regarding the SOP development and

document control processes. The SOPs provide guidance to personnel creating, editing, and archiving SOPs.

These documents included a new alphanumeric identification system and use a centralized storage location for

the electronic versions of QAPPs and SOPs. This was implemented to ensure QA documents are easily assessable

for all AAS personnel and will improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining the writing and review

efforts. In 2013, the DM&QA Unit produced a new administrative SOP for the corrective action program.

5.2 Measurement Quality Checks

Precision, Bias, and Completeness Measurements

QC checks are performed by the DM&QA Unit’s QA Auditor and generate data used to assess the quality of the

ambient air data collected by AAS. As previously stated, these QC checks assess how well an air monitoring

network is operating in order to quantify the amount of measurement error present in the data from field

operations. EPA publishes the requirements for measurement quality checks in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A.

The verifications and PE audits generate quality control data used to assess the amount of precision and bias

introduced into air quality data by the monitoring process. Collocated monitors generate precision data as well.

These data are reviewed regularly to determine if the quality of the ambient air data meet their intended

purpose and to survey how well monitoring networks are meeting the QA requirements for precision, bias, and

completeness as required in 40 CFR Part 58. The information gained from precision and bias data is important

for data certification and user purposes. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40

CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants. Statistical evaluations of the QC data are available in several reports

generated by the EPA’s AQS database. These reports include the AMP 255

‐ Data Quality Indicator Report, the

AMP 455 NC

‐ Quick Look All Parameters and the AMP 600

‐ Data Certification Report.

Currently, the digital flow and gas standards used by AMU and QA are annually certified, or verified, to the

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable standard. The standards used by QA for criteria

pollutant gases are NIST

‐ certified annually and the O 3 standards are NIST

‐ certified twice per year. The VOC

samplers are calibrated annually by ATEC and NIST

‐ certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl samplers are

currently calibrated annually by ATEC and NIST

‐ certified annually by either ATEC or ERG. For detailed

information on the air monitoring instrument, or method, used at each site, see Appendix C and D. Table 5.1

shows the frequency and type of measurement quality checks performed on ADEQ monitors.

5.3 Calculations and Reporting

ADEQ submits the required precision and bias report(s) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per

certification guidelines and CFR requirements. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM)

measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM

flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 43 Audit data for both PM and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly. ERG and RTI laboratories submit QC

check information for the NATTS and CSN program, respectively. The EPA reports the NPAP and PEP QC results

to AQS.

ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports

Periodically, EPA publishes reports for some of the criteria pollutant networks, and potentially non

‐ criteria

pollutant networks, that rank U.S. monitoring organizations’ performance over a three year period. The QA

Team as well as other personnel in DM&QA review these reports to gauge how well our networks are

performing with those across the nation. If needed, corrective actions are taken to ensure data are of the

highest quality possible. ADEQ is monitoring the PM 2.5 network to see how it performs nationally based on the

results published in the most recent EPA report, the 3

‐ Year Quality Assurance Report Calendar Years 2005, 2006,

and 2007 The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program (February 2009).

5.4 The Audit Program

Several types of quality control audits and assessments are performed on ADEQ’s air monitoring networks.

ADEQ performs t 

### he PE audits as per CFR 40 Part 58 Appendix A, Section 3.2.2. For information specific to

each network or pollutant, see the applicable ADEQ quality assurance program plan (QAPP).

5.4.1 Summary of Audits Conducted by ADEQ

Surveillance

ADEQ AAS routinely observes how well a monitor is functioning and takes timely action to mitigate any

performance issues to monitoring instruments and/or networks.

PE Audits

In addition to ADEQ instruments, the QA Team conducts PE audits of PCAQCD monitors that are included in the

interagency agreement and some source monitors.

Internal Audits

Technical Systems Audits (TSA)

‐ The QA Team plans on conducting a comprehensive internal TSA every three

years or more frequently if needed; however, the TSA may be more focused on a particular air monitoring

network(s) if changes to regulations, noted performance concerns, or emerging issues are occurring. The

internal TSAs will alternate with the EPA TSA schedule.

Audits of Data Quality (ADQ)

‐ The QA Team plans on conducting an ADQ twice per year.

Data Quality Assessments (DQA)

‐ The DM&QA Unit Manager conducts the DQA as part of the annual data

certification process.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 44 5.4.2 Summary of Audits Conducted by EPA

EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have authority to audit ADEQ's ambient air monitoring program.

The National Performance Evaluation Program (NPEP)

The EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) at Headquarters oversee the NPEP program,

which includes a number of QC evaluations. These include, but are not limited to:

 Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)– for ADEQ this applies to the PM 2.5 and Pb TSP monitors and

analytical laboratory (Pb only),

 National Performance Audit Program (NPAP)

– for ADEQ this applies to the gaseous pollutant monitors,

Ambient Air

– Protocol Gas Verificaiton Program

– for ADEQ this applies to the gaseous pollutant

monitors and participation is voluntary

– ADEQ participated in 2011.

 Gravimetric Inter

‐ lab Study for PM 2.5 by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory

– the ADEQ Air Filter Laboratory has been voluntarily participating in this performance test since 2009.

Note that ADEQ will continue to participate in the NPAP and PEP audit programs using EPA’s services versus

conducting this test independently.

EPA Technical Systems Audits

In conformance with 40 CFR Part 58 App. A Section 2.5, EPA Region 9 conducts a TSA on ADEQ’s air monitoring

program every three years and the results are reported to the AQS.

EPA Region 9 most recently conducted a TSA of ADEQ’s air monitoring program in April 2012. Findings and

recommendations from the TSA along with corrective action plans have been documented in a report for EPA

Region 9. ADEQ is working with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2012 TSA and is constantly progressing

with corrective actions since 2012.

In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for

EPA, and corrective actions were put in

‐ place for the findings and recommendations. We anticipate another

NATTS TSA will take place in the future.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 45 

## Appendix A

– Definitions and Abbreviations

AAAD Air Assessment Ambient Database

AAS Air Assessment Section

AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic

ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

AFL Air Filter Lab

AMU Air Monitoring Unit

ASARCO American Smelting and Refining Company, LLC

ATEC Atmospheric Technologies, Inc.

Auto GC/MS Automated Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer

AQS Air Quality System (EPA database)

BAM Beta Attenuation Monitor

Bext Total Light Extinction

Bscat Light Scattering

CAA Clean Air Act

CBSA Core Based Statistical Area

CEDES Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CO Carbon Monoxide

CSN Chemical Speciation Network

DCS Data Collection System

DM&QA Data Management & Quality Assurance Unit

DQO Data Quality Objective

E

‐ BAM Environment Proof

‐ Beta Attenuation Monitor

EDO Environmental Data Operation

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

ERG Eastern Research Group, Inc.

FEM Federal Equivalent Method

FMMI Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc.

FRM Federal Reference Method

HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant

ICP

‐ MS Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments

MCAQD Maricopa County Air Quality Department

MET Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity)

MQO Measurement Quality Objective

MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area

μ g/m 3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

NAREL National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory

NATA National Air Toxics AssessmentState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 46 NATTS National Air Toxics Trends Station

NCore National Core multipollutant monitoring stations

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

NM National Monument

NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide

NOx Nitrogen oxides

NOy Reactive Nitrogen Oxides

NPAP National Performance Audit Program

NPEP National Performance Evaluation Program

NPS National Park Service

NWS National Weather Service

O 3 Ozone

OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

PAMS Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station

Pb Lead

PCAQCD Pinal County Air Quality Control District

PDEQ Pima County Department of Environmental Quality

PE Performance Evaluation

PEP Performance Evaluation Program

PM Particulate Matter

PM 10 Particulate Matter ≤ 10 microns

PM

coarse Coarse Particulate Matter between 2.5 to 10 micrometers aerodynamic diameter, may also be

denoted as PM 10

‐ 2.5

PM 2.5 Particulate Matter ≤ 2.5 microns

POC Parameter Occurrence Code

ppb Parts Per Billion

ppm Parts Per Million

PQAO Primary Quality Assurance Organization

PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration

PWEI Populated Weighted Emissions Index

QA Quality Assurance

QAPP Quality Assurance Program Plan

QC Quality Control

QMP Quality Management Plan

RASS Radar Acoustic Sounding System

SEMARNAT Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources

SIP State Implementation Plan

SLAMS State and Local Air Monitoring Stations

SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

SPM Special Purpose MonitorState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 47 SRO Southern Regional Office

STN Speciation Trends Network

TAD Technical Assistance Document

TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance

TSA Technical System Audit

USFS United States Forest Service

VOC Volatile Organic Compound

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 48 

## Appendix B – Network Maps

There are eleven maps in this section illustra ting the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:

 CO Network

 NO 2 

### Network

 O 3 

### Network

 SO 2 

### Network

 Pb Network

 PM 10 

### Network

 PM 2.5 

### Network

 Meteorological Network

 Urban Visibility Network

 IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 49

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 50

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 51

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 52

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 53

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 54

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 55

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 56

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 57

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 58

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 59 

## Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network

This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors

that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors). Only those monitors that are in

operation at the time that this network plan was creat ed are included in this a ppendix. Monitors that are

proposed to be installed or those th at were discontinued prior to the cr eation of this network plan are not

included in this appendix. Since in dividual pollutants or networks have specific monitoring or siting

criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout

a program or network. See Appendix D for detail ed information on specific monitoring sites.

NON-REGULATORY NETWORKS

Meteorology

Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................62

Wind ........................................................................................................................ .......................64

Special Purpose Monitors (SPM) ............................................................................................... ..........66

NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS

State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS)

CO .......................................................................................................................... ........................67

NO 2



### .............................................................................................................................. ..................68

O 3



### .............................................................................................................................. .....................69

SO 2



### .............................................................................................................................. ...................70

Pb .......................................................................................................................... .........................71

PM 10



### .............................................................................................................................. .................72

PM 2.5



### .............................................................................................................................. ................74

Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) ............................................................................................ ......76

National Core Multi-Pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore) ..............................................................77

Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ..................................................................79

AIR TOXICS

National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ..................................................................................... ...82

Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP) ..............................................................................83

VISIBILITY

Urban Haze

Camera ...................................................................................................................... .....................84

Nephelometer ................................................................................................................ .................85

Transmissometer ............................................................................................................. ...............86

Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................87

Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................88

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 60 Definitions for Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network

Local Site Name Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD

database

Pollutant (POC) The pollutant(s) or parameter(s ) being collected or measured at the site

and the POC is the Primary Occurrence Code for the instrument, as it is

in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD

Parameter code The AQS code representing a specific pollutant being measured or

monitored

Basic monitoring

objective Purpose of monitoring for the paramete r at the site (P ublic Information,

NAAQS Comparison, or Research)

Site type(s) A brief description of th e intended purpose of the monitor’s

measurements (Extreme Downwi nd, Highest Concentration, Max

Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure,

Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional

Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other)

Monitor type(s) The associated monitori ng network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index

Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed

NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Sp ecial Purpose, Supplemental

Speciation, Trends Speciation, Trib al Monitor, Unofficial PAMS)

Instrument manufacturer

and model The specific make and model of the m onitor or instrument used in the

network

Method code The AQS code representing the particular method for collecting samples

of the specified instrument

FRM/FEM/ARM/other Denotes if the instrume nt is a Federal Reference Method, Federal

Equivalency Method, Approved Regiona l Method (for continuous PM 2.5 

### only), or other according to the Federal Registry

Collecting Agency Name of agency collecting data

Analytical Lab (weight,

toxics, other) Name of laboratory performing sample analysis

Reporting Agency Name of agency reporting the data

Spatial scale (micro,

neighborhood) Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m,

middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km,

regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global)

Monitoring start date

(MM/DD/YYYY) Date that the monitor was started at the site

Current sampling

frequency (1:3,

continuous) Frequency the instrument collect s samples or measurements (e.g.

hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6, etc.)

Calculated sampling

frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Theoretical frequency for particular matter instrument based on Ratio to

Standard Figure in 40CFR Part 58.12 (e.g. hourly, daily, 1:3, 1:6)

Sampling season

(MM/DD-MM/DD) Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout

a given year (expressed as a range of months)

Probe height (meters) Distance the pr obe is from the ground in meters (O 3 

### and SO 2 

### probes

must be between 2 and 15 meters; ot hers pollutants must be between 2

to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters)

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 61 Distance from supporting

structure (meters) For rooftop probe(s) only. The separati on distance is in reference to

walls, parapets, or penthouses located on roof

Distance from

obstructions on roof

(meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction on the roof

in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions)

Distance from

obstructions not on roof

(meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction not on the

roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from

obstructions)

Distance from trees

(meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest tree in meters (must be

a minimum of 10 meters from drip line)

Distance to furnace or

incinerator flue (meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest furnace or incinerator

flue in meters (for Pb and SO 2 

### ; designed to avoid undue influences from

minor sources)

Distance between

collocated monitors

(meters) Distance between the centers of collo cated instruments in meters (must

be between 1 and 4 meters)

Unrestricted airflow

(degrees) Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is

free from obstructions (minimum of 180°)

Probe material for reactive

gases Type of material probe is made of (SO 2 

### , NO 2 

### , O 3 

### must have FEP Teflon

or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VO Cs must be borosilicate glass or

stainless steel)

Residence time for

reactive gases (seconds) Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the

instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds)

Changes within the next

18 months? (Y/N) Are there any planned changes to the monitoring in the next 18 months?

(Y or N)

Comparison against the

annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Are the data being compared against the annual PM 2.5 

### NAAQS

standards? (Y or N)

Frequency of flow rate

verification manual PM

samplers Frequency at which flow rate verifi cations occur for manual particulate

matter instrument (daily, w eekly, bi-weekly, monthly)

Frequency of flow rate

verification automated PM

analyzers Frequency at which flow rate ve rifications occur for automated

particulate matter instrument (da ily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly)

Frequency of one-point

QC check gaseous

instruments Frequency at which zero/span/pr ecision checks occur for gaseous

instruments (daily, week ly, bi-weekly, monthly)

Last Annual PE audit for

gaseous parameters Date the last Performance Evalua tion audit was performed on the

gaseous instrument. (SO 2 

### , NO 2 

### , O 3 

### , CO, etc.) (MM/DD/YYYY)

Last two semi-annual flow

rate audits PM Dates of the last two audits on the particulate matter instrument flow

rate. (MM/DD/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY)Local Site NameDouglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post OfficePollutant (POC)Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1)Parameter code62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201Basic monitoring objective-- -- -- -- -- --Site type(s)PopulationExposureHighestConcentration,Source OrientedSource OrientedPopulationExposureSource OrientedPopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- -- -- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeMethod code040 040 040 040 040 040FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)08/16/2012 04/15/2011 02/02/2011 07/01/1993 06/08/2011 08/11/2011Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)2 2 2 2 2 5.2Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from trees (meters)13 3.6 12 6 6 5Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 360 180 300 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 62Local Site NamePaul Spur ChemicalLime PlantPayson Well Site Queen Valley RillitoVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryYuma SupersitePollutant (POC)Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp/RH (1)Parameter code62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201Basic monitoring objective-- -- -- -- -- --Site type(s)Source OrientedPopulationExposureDownwind Source OrientedPopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- -- -- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelVaisala HMP 155ProbeVaisala HMP 45CProbeVaisala HMP 45CProbeVaisala HMP 45CProbeRotronics MP101AProbeVaisala HMP 155ProbeMethod code040 040 040 040 040 040FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 03/30/2010 05/11/1999 03/17/2010Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)2 2 2.4 2.4 4.5 2Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- 5 -- -- -- 1Distance from trees (meters)9 1 1.2 19 10 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 250 180 270 360 220Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 63Local Site NameAjo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post OfficePollutant (POC)Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1)Parameter code61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104Basic monitoring objective-- -- -- -- -- -- --Site type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposureHighestConcentration,Source OrientedSource OrientedPopulationExposureSource OrientedPopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerMethod code020 020 020 020 020 020 020FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/1969 08/06/2012 04/15/2011 02/02/2011 07/01/1993 06/08/2011 01/01/1980Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)11.3 10 10 10 11.5 10.5 12Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from trees (meters)42 13 -- -- 12 -- --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 360 360 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- -- --Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - WindState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 64Local Site NamePaul Spur ChemicalLime PlantPayson Well Site Queen Valley RillitoVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryYuma SupersitePollutant (POC)Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1)Parameter code61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104Basic monitoring objective-- -- -- -- -- --Site type(s)Source OrientedPopulationExposureDownwind Source OrientedPopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- -- -- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerMethod code020 020 020 020 020 020FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 01/08/2004 05/11/1999 03/17/2010Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/32Probe height (meters)10 10 10 10.4 10 10Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- 30 33Distance from trees (meters)35 2 -- 20 50 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 270 360 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 65Local Site NameFlagstaff MiddleSchoolPayson Well SitePrescott CollegeAQDSedona Fire StationAQDPollutant (POC)PM2.5(1) PM2.5(1) PM2.5(1) PM2.5(1)Parameter code-- -- -- --Basic monitoring objectivePublic Information Public Information Public Information Public InformationSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)Special Purpose Special Purpose Special Purpose Special PurposeInstrument manufacturer and modelMet One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAMMethod code-- -- -- --FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)09/09/1999 05/16/2012 07/13/2011 12/16/2011Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)6 2 6 3.6Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)15 -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- 6 -- 3Distance from trees (meters)15 4 7 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)270 90 250 300Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)NNNNFrequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyFrequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- --Non-Regulatory - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 66Local Site NameJLG SupersitePollutant (POC)CO (1)Parameter code42101Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQS ComparisonSite type(s)HighestConcentrationMonitor type(s)SLAMS, NCore,PAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelEcotech EC9830TMethod code588FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEMCollecting AgencyADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)--Reporting AgencyADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/1993Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)--Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)5Distance from supporting structure (meters)--Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)--Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)2.5Distance from trees (meters)8Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)--Distance between collocated monitors (meters)--Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210Probe material for reactive gasesGlass, TeflonResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)0.76Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)--Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers--Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers--Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-WeeklyLast Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters02/12/2013Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM--NAAQS - SLAMS - COState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 67Local Site NameJLG SupersitePollutant (POC)NO2(1)Parameter code42602Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)HighestConcentrationMonitor type(s)SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelEcotech EC9841BMethod code074FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFRMCollecting AgencyADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)--Reporting AgencyADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/1993Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)--Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)5Distance from supporting structure (meters)--Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)--Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)2.5Distance from trees (meters)8Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)--Distance between collocated monitors (meters)--Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210Probe material for reactive gasesGlass, TeflonResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)0.89Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)--Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers--Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers--Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-WeeklyLast Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters06/13/2013Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM--NAAQS - SLAMS - NO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 68Local Site NameAlamo LakeFlagstaff MiddleSchoolJLG SupersitePrescott CollegeAQDQueen ValleyTonto NationalMonumentYuma SupersitePollutant (POC)O3(1) O3(1) O3(1) O3(1) O3(1) O3(1) O3(1)Parameter code44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)Regional TransportMax O3ConcentrationMax O3ConcentrationMax O3ConcentrationDownwind DownwindMax O3ConcentrationMonitor type(s)SLAMS SLAMSSLAMS, NCore,PAMSSLAMS SLAMS, PAMS SLAMS SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelTeledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Thermo 49C Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400EMethod code087 087 087 047 087 087 087FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEMCollecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)05/20/2005 03/13/2008 07/01/1993 03/25/2008 01/01/1998 05/22/2002 05/06/2008Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31Probe height (meters)5.5 10 5 6 5 5 5Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- 2 -- 1 -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- 4 -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- 2 -- -- -- 33Distance from trees (meters)12 15 8 12 4 6 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 210 220 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gasesTeflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon TeflonResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)2.91 8.66 0.83 3.60 3.56 3.53 2.98Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-WeeklyLast Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters08/21/2012 06/19/2013 05/06/2013 06/04/2013 08/22/2012 04/25/2013 05/09/2013Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- -- --NAAQS - SLAMS - O3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 69Local Site NameHayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Jones Ranch Miami Ridgeline Miami TownsitePollutant (POC)SO2(1) SO2(1) SO2(1) SO2(1) SO2(1)Parameter code42401 42401 42401 42401 42401Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)Source OrientedPopulationExposureSource Oriented Source Oriented Source OrientedMonitor type(s)SLAMS SLAMS, NCore SLAMS SLAMS SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelEcotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Thermo 43C Ecotech EC9850TMethod code592 592 592 060 592FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FEM FEM FEM FEMCollecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)01/01/1975 03/03/2005 02/01/2013 10/05/1995 02/01/2013Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)5 5 4.5 4 5Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- 2 -- 2 25Distance from trees (meters)12 8 -- 9 15Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)280 -- 3081 1411 2300Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 210 360 180 220Probe material for reactive gasesTeflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon TeflonResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)4.75 0.51 4.08 4.88 3.96Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNYNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-WeeklyLast Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters01/23/2013 05/16/2013 07/30/2013 05/15/2013 03/19/2013Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- --NAAQS - SLAMS - SO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 70Local Site NameGlobe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Miami Golf CoursePollutant (POC)Pb (1) Pb (2)Pb-PM10(1)Pb (1)Parameter code14129 14129 85129 14129Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS ComparisonSite type(s)HighestConcentration,Source OrientedHighestConcentration,Source OrientedPopulationExposureSource OrientedMonitor type(s)SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS, NCore SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelTisch TE-8550-BLTSPTisch TE-8550-BLTSPThermo Partisol2000Tisch TE-8550-BLTSPMethod code191 191 202 191FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FEM FEM FEMCollecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)PCRWRD PCRWRD ERG PCRWRDReporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)10/01/2010 10/01/2010 01/01/2005 10/01/2010Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)2 2 4.67 3.5Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)3 5 2 --Distance from trees (meters)2276Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)1043 1043 -- 2635Distance between collocated monitors (meters)2.7 2.7 -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 210 300Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- --NAAQS - SLAMS - PbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 71Local Site NameAjo Bullhead City Douglas Red CrossFlagstaff MiddleSchoolHayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf CoursePollutant (POC)PM10(3) PM10(3) PM10(3) PM10(1) PM10(3) PM10(3) PM10(3)Parameter code 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureSource OrientedPopulationExposureSource OrientedMonitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelThermo TEOM1400ABThermo TEOM1400ABThermo TEOM1400ABThermo Partisol2000Thermo TEOM1400ABMet One BAM 1020Thermo TEOM1400ABMethod code 079 079 079 126 079 122 079FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FRM FEM FEM FEMCollecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- -- -- ADEQ AFL -- -- --Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/11/1991 11/05/1997 09/02/1998 10/30/1996 01/06/1981 07/01/1993 7/26/2012Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:1 1:1 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:2 1:6Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters) 3.553654.88 4Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- 15 -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)6 -- 10 -- -- 6 --Distance from trees (meters) 40 23 11 17 12 7 4Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 270 360 180 300Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNYNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- Monthly -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly Monthly Monthly -- Monthly Monthly MonthlyFrequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM10/31/2012,04/29/201310/31/2012,04/22/201308/08/2012,01/29/201311/27/2012,06/17/201308/2/2012,01/24/201305/13/2013,02/07/201307/31/2012,03/06/2013NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 72Local Site NameNogales Post Office Nogales Post OfficePaul Spur ChemicalLime PlantPayson Well Site Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito Yuma SupersitePollutant (POC)PM10(3) PM10(1) PM10(3) PM10(1) PM10(2) PM10(1) PM10(3) PM10(3)Parameter code 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposureSource OrientedPopulationExposurePopulationExposureGeneral/BackgroundSource OrientedPopulationExposureMonitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS SLAMS SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelMet One BAM 1020Thermo Partisol2000Thermo TEOM1400ABThermo Partisol2000Thermo Partisol2000Thermo Partisol2000Thermo TEOM1400ABThermo TEOM1400ABMethod code 122 126 079 126 126 126 079 079FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRM FRM FRM FEM FEMCollecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL -- --Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 01/06/1991 01/01/1991 01/01/1991 03/16/2003 01/03/1985 12/01/2009Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous 1:6 1:6 1:6 Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:1 1:1 1:2 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)8 7 3 3 3 6 4.3 5Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 10 12 -- -- -- 3 -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)13 10 -- 8 8 -- 3 33Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 35 3 3 12 20 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)3 3 -- 2 2 -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 300 300 360 270 270 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNYYYNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- Monthly -- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly -- Monthly -- -- -- Monthly MonthlyFrequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM08/09/2012,01/30/201308/09/2012,01/30/201308/08/2012,01/29/201311/08/2012,06/17/201311/08/2012,06/17/201311/28/2012,06/03/201311/20/20012,06/10/201311/01/2012,04/29/2013NAAQS - SLAMS - PM10continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 73Local Site NameDouglas Red CrossFlagstaff MiddleSchoolJLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)PM2.5(3) PM2.5(1) PM2.5(3) PM2.5(1)Parameter code 88101 88101 88101 88101Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCoreInstrument manufacturer and modelMet One BAM 1020Thermo Partisol2000Met One BAM 1020Thermo Partisol2000Method code 170 143 170 143FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRMCollecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- ADEQ AFL -- ADEQ AFLReporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 11/02/2000 09/09/1999 07/01/2003 07/01/2003Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous 1:3Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters) 3 6 4.88 4.67Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- 15 -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 -- 6 6Distance from trees (meters) 11 19 7 8Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 270 180 210Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NYNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)YYYYFrequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- Monthly -- MonthlyFrequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly -- Monthly --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM08/08/2012,01/29/201311/27/2012,06/17/201312/05/2012,05/13/201308/15/2012,02/07/2013NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 74Local Site NameNogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Prescott Valley Yuma SupersitePollutant (POC)PM2.5(3) PM2.5(1) PM2.5(2) PM2.5(1) PM2.5(3)Parameter code 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonNAAQSComparisonSite type(s)HighestConcentrationHighestConcentrationHighestConcentrationGeneral/BackgroundRegional TransportMonitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated QA Collocated SLAMS SLAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelMet One BAM 1020Thermo Partisol2000Thermo Partisol2000Thermo Partisol2000Met One BAM 1020Method code 170 143 143 143 170FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FRM FRM FEMCollecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL --Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 12/28/2007 01/01/2010Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 1:6 1:6 ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)87765Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 15 10 8 3 --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)8 15 15 -- 33Distance from trees (meters) 12 12 7 12 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)3 3, 2 2 -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 300 300 300 360 360Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNYNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)YYYYYFrequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- Monthly Monthly Monthly --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly -- -- -- MonthlyFrequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM08/09/2012,01/30/201308/09/2012,01/30/201308/09/2012,01/30/201311/28/2012,06/03/201311/01/2012,04/29/2013NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 75Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)PM2.5Speciation (7) PM2.5Speciation (7)Parameter codeMultiple MultipleBasic monitoring objectiveResearch ResearchSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)SupplementalSpeciation, NCoreSupplementalSpeciation, NCoreInstrument manufacturer and modelMet OneSuperSASSURG 3000NMethod codeVarious VariousFRM/FEM/ARM/other-- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)RTI RTIReporting AgencyRTI RTISpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)02/21/2000 02/21/2000Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)1:3 1:3Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)4.60 4.80Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)10 10Distance from trees (meters)12 12Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)230 230Probe material for reactive gases-- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)N NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplersMonthly MonthlyFrequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM08/30/2012,02/26/201308/30/2012,02/26/2013NAAQS - CSNState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 76Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)CO (1) NOy (1)O3(1) SO2(1) Pb-PM10(1) PM10-2.5(1)Parameter code42101 42600 44201 42401 85129 86101Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison ResearchSite type(s)HighestConcentrationPopulationExposureMax O3ConcentrationPopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)SLAMS, NCore,PAMSNCoreSLAMS, NCore,PAMSSLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore NCoreInstrument manufacturer and modelEcotech EC9830T Ecotech 9843 Teledyne API 400E Ecotech EC9850TThermo Partisol2000Met One BAM 1020Method code588 591 087 592 202 185FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEMCollecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)------ -- ERG--Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 03/03/2005 01/01/2005 11/10/2010Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)5 10 5 5 4.67 4.88Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)2.5 -- 2 2 2 6Distance from trees (meters)858877Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210 210 210 210 210 180Probe material for reactive gasesGlass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)0.76 13.08 0.83 0.51 -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- MonthlyFrequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters02/12/2013 08/15/2012 05/16/2013 05/16/2013 --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- --NAAQS - NCoreState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 77Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)PM2.5(3) PM2.5(1) PM2.5Speciation (7) PM2.5Speciation (7)Temp/RH (1) Wind (1)Parameter code88101 88101 Multiple Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104Basic monitoring objectiveNAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Research Research -- --Site type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCoreSupplementalSpeciation, NCoreSupplementalSpeciation, NCore-- --Instrument manufacturer and modelMet One BAM 1020Thermo Partisol2000Met OneSuperSASSURG 3000NVaisala HMP 155ProbeRM Young 5305AnemometerMethod code170 143 Various Various 040 020FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FRM -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- ADEQ AFL RTI RTI -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ RTI RTI ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/2003 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 07/01/1993Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)1:3 1:3 -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)4.88 4.67 4.60 4.80 2 11.5Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)6 6 10 10 -- --Distance from trees (meters)7 8 12 12 6 12Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)180 210 230 230 180 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)Y Y -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- Monthly Monthly Monthly -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzersMonthly -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM12/05/2012,05/13/201308/15/2012,02/07/201308/30/2012,02/26/201308/30/2012,02/26/2013-- --NAAQS - NCore continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 78Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)CO (1) NOx (1)O3(1)Carbonyl (30,31) Carbonyl (32) VOC (6)Parameter code42101 42603 44201 Multiple Multiple MultipleBasic monitoring objectiveNAAQSComparisonResearchNAAQSComparisonResearch Research ResearchSite type(s)HighestConcentrationPopulationExposureMax O3ConcentrationMax PrecursorImpactQA CollocatedMax PrecursorImpactMonitor type(s)SLAMS, NCore,PAMSPAMSSLAMS, NCore,PAMSPAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTSInstrument manufacturer and modelEcotech EC9830T Ecotech EC9841B Teledyne API 400E ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200Method code588 090 087 202 202 126FRM/FEM/ARM/otherFEM FEM FEM -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- ERG ERG ERGReporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ERG ERGSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 05/15/1999Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Every other month 1:6Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31Probe height (meters)5 5 5 4.55 4.55 4.55Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)2.5 2.5 2 8 8 8Distance from trees (meters)888666Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210 210 210 210 210 210Probe material for reactive gasesGlass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Stainless SteelResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)0.76 0.89 0.83 -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstrumentsBi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters02/12/2013 06/13/2013 05/06/2013 -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --NAAQS - PAMSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 79Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen Valley Queen Valley Queen ValleyPollutant (POC)VOC (7) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1)O3(1)NOy (1) VOC (6)Parameter codeMultiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 44201 42600 MultipleBasic monitoring objectiveResearch -- --NAAQSComparisonResearch ResearchSite type(s)QA CollocatedPopulationExposurePopulationExposureDownwind Downwind DownwindMonitor type(s)PAMS, NATTS -- -- SLAMS, PAMS PAMS PAMSInstrument manufacturer and modelATEC 2200Vaisala HMP 155ProbeRM Young 5305AnemometerTeledyne API 400EThermo 42C TLReactiveATEC 8001Method code126 040 020 087 574 126FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- FEM FEM --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)ERG -- -- -- -- ERGReporting AgencyERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional RegionalMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)05/15/1999 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Every other month Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31Probe height (meters)4.55 2 11.5 5 10 5Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)8 -- -- -- -- --Distance from trees (meters)6 6 12 4 4 4Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210 180 360 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gasesStainless Steel -- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Stainless SteelResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- 3.56 13.8 --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- 08/22/2012 08/22/2012 --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --NAAQS - PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 80Local Site NameQueen Valley Queen ValleyVehicle EmissionsLabVehicle EmissionsLabVehicle EmissionsLabVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryPollutant (POC)Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Delta Temp (1)Horizontal SolarRaditation (1)Ultraviolet SolarRadiation (1)Temp R/H (1) Wind (1)Parameter code62101, 62201 61103, 61104 62101, 61202 63301 63302, 63304 62101, 62201 61103, 61104Basic monitoring objective-- -- Research Research Research -- --Site type(s)Downwind DownwindPopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- PAMS PAMS PAMS -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelVaisala HMP 45CProbeRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 7627 Li-Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR UVRotronics MP101AProbeRM Young 5305AnemometerMethod code040 020 810 011 011 040 020FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)06/23/2003 06/23/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004 05/11/1999 05/11/1999Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)2.4 10 2.5 - 10 5 5 4.5 10Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- 30Distance from trees (meters)1.2 -- 10 10 10 10 50Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)180 360 360 360 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- -- --NAAQS - PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 81Local Site NameJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersitePollutant (POC)Carbonyl (6) Carbonyl (7) VOC (6) VOC (7) SVOC (6)PM10metalsspeciation (1)Parameter codeMultiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple MultipleBasic monitoring objectiveResearch Research Research Research Research ResearchSite type(s)Population Exposure QA Collocated Population Exposure QA Collocated Population Exposure Population ExposureMonitor type(s)PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS NATTS NATTSInstrument manufacturer and modelATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 ATEC 2200 Tisch TE-1000BLThermo Partisol2000Method code202 202 101 101 118 202FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERGReporting AgencyERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERGSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)05/15/1999 05/15/1999 06/06/2001 06/06/2001 07/08/2007 01/01/2005Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)1:6 Every other month 1:6 Every other month 1:6 1:6Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)4.55 4.55 4.55 4.55 3.86 4.67Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)882859Distance from trees (meters)666659Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)210 210 210 210 210 210Probe material for reactive gasesTeflon Teflon Stainless Steel Stainless Steel -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- MonthlyFrequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- --08/15/2012,02/07/2013Air Toxics -NATTSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 82Local Site NameSouth PhoenixPollutant (POC)VOC (6)Parameter codeMultipleBasic monitoring objectiveResearchSite type(s)PopulationExposureMonitor type(s)UATMPInstrument manufacturer and modelATEC 8001Method code101FRM/FEM/ARM/other--Collecting AgencyADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)ERGReporting AgencyERGSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)NeighborhoodMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)8/5/2001Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)1:12Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)--Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)6Distance from supporting structure (meters)--Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)--Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)2Distance from trees (meters)10Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)--Distance between collocated monitors (meters)--Unrestricted airflow (degrees)250Probe material for reactive gasesStainless SteelResidence time for reactive gases (seconds)--Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)--Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers--Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers--Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments--Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters--Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM--Air Toxics - UATMPState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 83Local Site NameADEQ BuildingBanner MesaMedical CenterEstrella MountainCommunity CollegeEstrella MountainCommunity CollegeNorth MountainSummitPollutant (POC)Visibility (1) Visibility (1) Visibility (1) Visibility (2) Visibility (1)Parameter code-- -- -- -- --Basic monitoring objectivePublic Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Public InformationSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- -- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelCANON EOS RebelT2iCANON EOS RebelT2iCANON EOS RebelT2iCANON EOS RebelT2iCANON EOS RebelT2iMethod code-- -- -- -- --FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- -- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- -- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Urban Urban Urban Urban UrbanMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/01/2002 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min.Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance from trees (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)-- -- -- -- --Probe material for reactive gases-- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- -- -- --Visibility - Urban Haze - CameraState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 84Local Site NameDysart EstrellaVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryPollutant (POC)Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1)Parameter code-- -- --Basic monitoring objectivePublic Information Public Information Public InformationSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelOptec NGN 2NephelometerOptec NGN 2NephelometerOptec NGN 2NephelometerMethod code-- -- --FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Urban Urban UrbanMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)01/01/2003 01/01/2003 06/25/2003Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min.Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)555Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- --Distance from trees (meters)-- 5 10Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)NNNComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- --Visibility - Urban Haze - NephelometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 85Local Site NamePhoenixTransmissometerReceiverPhoenixTransmissometerTransmitterPollutant (POC)Bext (1) Bext (1)Parameter code-- --Basic monitoring objectivePublic Information Public InformationSite type(s)PopulationExposurePopulationExposureMonitor type(s)-- --Instrument manufacturer and modelOptec LVP-2TransmissometerReceiverOptec LVP-2TransmissometerMethod code-- --FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Urban UrbanMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)12/01/1992 12/01/1992Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)30 27Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)5 --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- --Distance from trees (meters)-- --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)240 360Probe material for reactive gases-- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)N NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- --Visibility - Urban Haze - TransmissometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 86Local Site NameDysart EstrellaPhoenixTransmissometerReceiverPollutant (POC)Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1)Parameter code62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201Basic monitoring objective-- -- --Site type(s)Population Exposure Population Exposure Population ExposureMonitor type(s)-- -- --Instrument manufacturer and modelRotronics MP101AProbeRotronics MP101AProbeRotronics MP101AProbeMethod code040 040 040FRM/FEM/ARM/other-- -- --Collecting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)-- -- --Reporting AgencyADEQ ADEQ ADEQSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood)Urban Urban UrbanMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY)07/16/2003 02/11/2003 01/01/1994Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous)Continuous Continuous ContinuousCalculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)-- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD)01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)5 5 32Distance from supporting structure (meters)-- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)-- -- 10Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)-- -- --Distance from trees (meters)-- 5 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees)360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases-- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)-- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)YYYComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)-- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters-- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM-- -- --Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 87Local Site NameChiricahuaEntrance StationDouglas RedCrossGrand CanyonNational Park -Hance CampGrand CanyonNational Park -Indian GardensGreer WaterTreatment PlantIke's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite MeadviewPollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEParameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple MultipleBasic monitoring objective Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research ResearchSite type(s) Background Other Background Background Other Other Other Other BackgroundMonitor type(s) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEInstrument manufacturer and model -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Method code Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousFRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other OtherCollecting Agency NPS ADEQ NPS NPS NFS UC Davis ADEQ ADEQ NFSAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Reporting Agency UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC DavisSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood RegionalMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/02/1988 06/02/2004 09/24/1997 10/01/1989 02/29/2000 04/02/2000 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 09/04/1991Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters) 4 3 -- 4 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- 2 1.5 1 -- -- --Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)10 8 -- -- -- 5 10 10 --Distance from trees (meters) 10 6 -- 6 50 23 10 10 --Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- 4 4 --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 -- 300 360 360 220 220 360Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)N N N Y N N N N NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N NFrequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM -- 01/29/2013 -- -- 09/11/2012 11/07/2012 10/30/2012 10/30/2012 06/05/2013Visibility - IMPROVEState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 88Local Site NameOrgan PipeNationalMonumentPetrified ForestNational ParkPleasant ValleyRanger StationQueen ValleySaguaro NationalPark EastSaguaro NationalPark WestSycamore CanyonTonto NationalMonumentPollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEParameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple MultipleBasic monitoring objective Research Research Research Research Research Research Research ResearchSite type(s) Other Background Other Other Background Other Background BackgroundMonitor type(s) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEInstrument manufacturer and model -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Method code Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousFRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other OtherCollecting Agency NPS NPS NFS ADEQ NPS NPS ADEQ / UC Davis NPSAnalytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Reporting Agency UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC DavisSpatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional RegionalMonitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/15/2003 03/02/1988 02/10/2000 04/30/2001 06/04/1988 04/19/2001 09/11/1991 04/23/1988Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31Probe height (meters)4 4 5 6 -- 4 4 5Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.5 -- 1.5 2.5 -- 1.5 1.5 1.5Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- 73 -- -- -- --Distance from trees (meters) 12 -- 20 5 -- 15 15 8Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance between collocated monitors (meters)-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 -- 360 360 360Probe material for reactive gases -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N)N N N N N N N NComparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) N N N N N N N NFrequency of flow rate verification manual PMsamplers-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of flow rate verification automated PManalyzers-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Frequency of one-point QC check gaseousinstruments-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM 05/08/2013 -- 03/07/2013 02/13/2013 -- 07/18/2012 09/04/2012 06/11/2013Visibility - IMPROVE - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013, Page 89

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 90 

## Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables

Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations



### This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by

ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a str ong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All

current sites and those closed af ter July 1, 2012 are included in th is appendix. Sites that were

closed after July 1, 2012 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section. This appendix

also contains general information about the air qu ality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for

more detailed information on sp ecific monitors and networks.

AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE

21737 ADEQ Building 94

04-019-0001 16316 Ajo 95

04-012-8000 34961 Alamo Lake 96

19489 Banner Mesa Medical Center 97

04-015-1003 16365 Bullhead City 98

04-003-8001 16679 Chiricahua Entrance Station 99

04-003-1005 16503 Douglas Red Cross 100

04-013-4010 19550 Dysart 102

04-013-8005 16506 Estrella 103

21736 Estrella Mountain Community College 104

04-005-1008 16707 Flagstaff Middle School 105

04-007-1002 16593 Globe Highway 106

04-005-8102 16682 Grand Canyon National Park – Hance Camp 107

04-005-8101 16683 Grand Canyon National Park – Indian Garden 108

04-001-8001 16323 Greer Water Treatment Plant 109

04-007-1001 16326 Hayden Old Jail 110

04-025-8104 16421 Ike’s Backbone 111

04-013-9997 16328 JLG Supersite 112

04-015-9000 21298 Meadview 115

04-007-8000 16629 Miami Golf Course 116

04-007-0011 16631 Miami Jones Ranch 117

04-007-0009 16382 Miami Ridgeline 118

04-007-0012 16632 Miami Townsite 119

04-023-0004 16511 Nogales Post Office 120

16480 North Mountain Summit 122

04-019-0005 16681 Organ Pipe National Monument 123

04-003-0011 16391 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 124

04-007-0008 16317 Payson Well Site 125

04-001-0012 16473 Petrified Forest National Park 126

16829 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver 127

16330 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter 128

04-007-8100 16446 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station 129

04-025-8033 133011 Prescott College AQD 130

04-025-2002 18392 Prescott Valley 131

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 91 AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE

04-021-8001 16394 Queen Valley 132

04-019-0020 16499 Rillito 134

04-019-0021 16474 Saguaro National Park East 135

04-019-9000 16475 Saguaro National Park West 136

142818 Sedona Fire Station AQD 137

04-013-4003 16377 South Phoenix 138

04-005-8103 16476 Sycamore Canyon 139

04-007-0010 16447 Tonto National Monument 140

04-013-9998 16363 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory 141

04-027-8011 11319 Yuma Supersite 143

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 92 Definitions for Appendix D – Si te Information Data Tables

Local Site Name Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD

database

Site Narrative Brief summary of the site location and surroundings

Site Information

AQS ID Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database

ADEQ ID Unique identifier from the AZURITE / AAAD database for each

monitoring site

Street Address Physical Street Address or cross streets of the monitoring site

County Arizona county the m onitor is located within

CBSA Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a

U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget

based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent

areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting.

Surrounding Area Description of area around monitoring site (residential, commercial,

industrial, agricultural, desert, fo rest, mobile, blighted area, and

military reservation)

Distance to Roadways Distance and direction from the edge of the roadway to the instrument

in meters

Traffic Count ADOT supplied traffic count for the nearest major roadway (data

obtained in 2010)

Groundcover Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement,

rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.)

Latitude The North/South geographic location of a site in decimal degrees

Longitude The East/West geographic loca tion of a site in decimal degrees

Elevation The vertical distance above sea level of the site in meters

Site Established Date Date site was first used as a monitoring site

Monitoring Information

Pollutant The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site

Basic monitoring

objective Purpose of monitoring for the paramete r at the site (P ublic Information,

NAAQS Comparison, or Research.)

Site type(s) A brief description of th e intended purpose of the monitor’s

measurements (Extreme Downwi nd, Highest Concentration, Max

Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure,

Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional

Transport, Welfare-Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other)

Monitor type(s) The associated monitori ng network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index

Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non-EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed

NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Sp ecial Purpose, Supplemental

Speciation, Trends Speciation, Trib al Monitor, Unofficial PAMS)

Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m,

middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50

km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global)

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 93 Monitor Start Date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site

Instrument

manufacture and

model The specific make and model of the m onitor or instrument used in the

network

Site Photos

Aerial View Image of site and th e surrounding area (using Google Earth)

Site View Most current photo of monitors at the site

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 94 ADEQ Building

The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of th e building and points

toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 km to the northeast. The pi ctures of the local

view are updated every 5 minutes an d can be viewed on the internet

at http://phoenixvis .net/index.aspx . The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is

primarily residential with some commercial areas.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21737

Street Address 1110 W. Wash ington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4483

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0878

Distance to roadway 84 m – S Elevation 329 m

Traffic count 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 07/01/2002

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Visibility

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) --

Instrument

manufacture and model CANON EOS

Rebel T2i

Spatial scale Urban

Monitor Start Date 07/01/2002

Site Photos

Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building –

4/2010

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 95 Ajo

The site is located at the Pima County Mainte nance Yard, with the wind system mounted to

the north of the instruments. The closest struct ure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT

office/trailer to the south. To the east lie the st abilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo

mining operation that closed in 1985.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID 16316

Street Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.3820

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.8575

Distance to roadway 109 m – E Elevation 515 m

Traffic count 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date 07/01/1969

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

TEOM

1400AB RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 02/11/1991 07/01/1969

Site Photos

Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower –

05/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 96 Alamo Lake

The site was established to replace the Hillside si te and is located in Alamo Lake State Park,

which is approximately 49 km north of Wende n, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly

desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000

gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter. More monitors will be added at this site over the

next year as it becomes a designated background site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID 34961

Street Address Alamo Lake State Park

County La Paz Groundcover Gravel

CBSA None Latitude 34.2439

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -113.5586

Distance to roadway 30 m – E Elevation 403 m

Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date 05/20/2005

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Regional

Transport

Monitor type(s) SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Teledyne API

400E

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 05/20/2005

Site Photos

Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the

east – 08/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 97 Banner Mesa Medical Center

The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east

of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on

the internet at http://phoenixvis .net/index.aspx . The area between the site and the mountains is

primarily residential with some commercial areas.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 19489

Street Address 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4335

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.8428

Distance to roadway 20 m – N Elevation 454 m

Traffic count 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Visibility

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) --

Instrument

manufacture and model CANON EOS

Rebel T2i

Spatial scale Urban

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center Banner Mesa Medical Center Camera–

05/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 98 Bullhead City

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7 t h



### Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The

Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters,

is the Bullhead City Airport.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID 16365

Street Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429

County Mohave Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 35.1539

Surrounding Area Commercia l/Residential Longitude -114.5661

Distance to roadway ~30 m – W Elevation 156 m

Traffic count 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date 11/01/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

TEOM

1400AB

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 11/05/1997

Site Photos

Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office– 06/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 99 Chiricahua Entrance Station

The site is operated by the NPS. The su rrounding area is wilder ness and desert. The

Chiricahua National Monument lies 3.8 km to the northeast.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID 16679

Street Address 13063 E. Bon ita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 32.0094

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.3891

Distance to roadway 99 m – E Elevation 1,570 m

Traffic count 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1988

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and

IMPROVE – 07/2008

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 100 Douglas Red Cross

The site is located at the Red Cr oss building on the south side of 15 t h 

### Street. The surrounding

area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the

Arizona/Mexico border. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS

database, a second AQS ID was created (04- 003-9000) for IMPROVE data. This is an

IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID 16503

Street Address 1445 E. 15 t h 

### St. Douglas, AZ 85607

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3492

Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -109.5396

Distance to roadway 30 m – N Elevation 1,231 m

Traffic count 2,320 – 14 t h 

### St. Site Established Date 09/01/1998

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Met One BAM

1020 Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 08/16/2012 08/06/2012

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 06/02/2004

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 101 Site Photos

Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 04/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 102 Dysart

The site is located in the Maricopa County Faci lity Maintenance Yard at the southeast corner

of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is sh ared with MCAQD. Th e surrounding area is

commercial and residential.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID 19550

Street Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.6370

Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.3393

Distance to roadway 14 m – W Elevation 357 m

Traffic count 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/2003

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Optec NGN 2

Nephelometer Rotronics

MP101A

Probe

Spatial scale Urban Urban

Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 07/16/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached

to county shelter – 03/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 103 Estrella

The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at

Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estr ella Mountains to the east, south, and

west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands,

residential, and commercial activity to the north.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID 16506

Street Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338

County Maricopa Groundcover Grass/Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.3833

Surrounding Area Desert/Recr eation Area Longitude -112.3728

Distance to roadway 258 m – N Elevation 277 m

Traffic count 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Optec NGN 2

Nephelometer Rotronics

MP101A

Probe

Spatial scale Urban Urban

Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 02/11/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 06/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 104 Estrella Mountain Community College

One high-resolution digital camera points to th e Estrella Mountains, wh ich lies 11 km to the

southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20 km to

the northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed

on the internet at http://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx . The area between the site and the mountain

ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21736

Street Address 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4836

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.3503

Distance to roadway 155 m – S Elevation 305 m

Traffic count 7,280 – Thomas Rd. S ite Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Visibility Visibility

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model CANON EOS

Rebel T2i CANON EOS

Rebel T2i

Spatial scale Urban Urban

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Mountain

Community College No photo

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 105 Flagstaff Middle School

The site is west of Bonito Road on the roof top of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The

surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the

west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 mete rs to the east. At the end of 2013 the O 3 

### , and

the PM 10 

### , and PM 2.5 

### Partisols, will be removed from this site. Only the PM 2.5 

### E-BAM unit will

remain at the site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID 16707

Street Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.2061

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.6528

Distance to roadway 70 m – E Elevation 2,120 m

Traffic count 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date 10/29/1996

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison Public

Information

Site type(s) Max O 3



### Concentration Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Special

Purpose

Instrument

manufacture and model Teledyne API

400E Thermo

Partisol 2000 Thermo

Partisol 2000 Met One

E-BAM

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 03/13/2008 10/30/1996 09/09/1999 09/09/1999

Site Photos

Aerial view of Flag staff Middle School Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff

Middle School – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 106 Globe Highway

This site is the location of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ. ASARCO mine

also maintains a SO 2 

### analyzer, Pb sampler, PM sampler, wind monitor, rain gage, and

temp/RH at the site. The site is located on th e southwest end of a sm all canyon and is located

approximately 1 km to the east/southeast of the ASARCO smelting facility. Due to its

proximity to the end of the canyon, the site may be influenced by both broad and local

meteorological conditions.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16593

Street Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.002

Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -110.765

Distance to roadway 5 m – W Elevation 602 m

Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1975

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Pb Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Highest

Concentration,

Source

Oriented Highest

Concentration,

Source

Oriented Highest

Concentration,

Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Tisch TE8550-BL TSP Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe

Highway – 07/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 107 Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp

The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931

meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID 16682

Street Address West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.9731

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.9841

Distance to roadway 200 m – E Elevation 2,235 m

Traffic count 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date 09/24/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 09/24/1997

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance

Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter –

date unknown

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 108 Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Gardens

The site is owned by the NPS. The site is loca ted in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the

Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the sout h side of the canyon along the Bright Angel

Trail. Due to budgetary constraints this si te will be closed by the end of 2013.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID 16683

Street Address Bright A ngel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 36.0778

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.1289

Distance to roadway 8,047 m – S Elevation 1,183 m

Traffic count 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Es tablished Date 10/01/1989

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 10/01/1989

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian

Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens

IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 109 Greer Water Treatment Plant

The site is located in the Apache National Fo rest and is operated the USFS. The surrounding

area is forest with the town of Greer appr oximately 4 km to the south/southwest.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID 16323

Street Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927

County Apache Groundcover Grass

CBSA None Latitude 34.0583

Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -109.4400

Distance to roadway 1,600 m – N Elevation 2,503 m

Traffic count 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 02/29/2000

Site Photos

Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant –

09/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 110 Hayden Old Jail

The site is located in a shelter next to the ol d Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The

instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved to a shelter next to the

jail due to safety and siting concerns in 2010. The surrounding area consists mainly of

residential and commercial. The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the

ASARCO smelting facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site

in the old jail building.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID 16326

Street Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235

County Gila Groundcover Shelter

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.0062

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.7864

Distance to roadway 5 m – E Elevation 625 m

Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1969

Monitoring Information

Pollutant SO 2 

### PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Ecotech

EC9850T Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 02/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail shelter and meteorological

tower – 05/2011

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 111 Ike’s Backbone

The site is operated by the USFS. The surr ounding area is Tonto National Forest, which

includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas. The site is lo cated on a small ridge

with the Verde River and mountains nearby.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421

Street Address Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544

County Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406

Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.6825

Distance to roadway n/a Elevation 1,303 m

Traffic count 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 04/02/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Ike’s Backbone IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone – 2011

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 112 JLG Supersite

The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan

area. The surrounding area is primarily resident ial neighborhoods, with I-17 approximately 1.6

km to the west. This is also an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID 16328

Street Address 4530 N. 17 t h 

### Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5038

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.0957

Distance to roadway 8.5 m – E Elevation 354 m

Traffic count 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant CO NO 2 

### / NOx NOy O 3 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison.

Research NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s)

Highest

Concentration Highest

Concentration,

Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Max O 3



### Concentration

Monitor type(s) SLAMS,

NCore, PAMS SLAMS,

PAMS NCore SLAMS,

NCore, PAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Ecotech

EC9830T Ecotech

EC9841B Ecotech 9843 Teledyne API

400E

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant SO 2 

### Carbonyl VOC SVOC

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Research Research Research

Site type(s)

Population

Exposure Population

Exposure, Max

Precursor

Impact Population

Exposure, Max

Precursor

Impact Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS,

NCore PAMS,

NATTS PAMS,

NATTS NATTS

Instrument

manufacture and model Ecotech

EC9850T ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 Tisch TE1000BL

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 03/03/2005 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 07/08/2007

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 113 Monitoring Information

Pollutant Pb-PM 10 

### /

PM 10 

### metals

speciation PM 10 

### PM 10-2.5 

### PM 2.5



### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison,

Research NAAQS

Comparison Research NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS,

NCore,

NATTS SLAMS NCore SLAMS,

NCore

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

Partisol 2000 Met One BAM

1020 Met One BAM

1020 Met One BAM

1020

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 01/01/2005 07/01/1993 11/10/2010 07/01/2003

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 2.5 

### PM 2.5 

### Speciation PM 2.5 

### Speciation Temp/RH

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Research Research --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS,

NCore Supplemental

Speciation,

NCore Supplemental

Speciation,

NCore --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

Partisol 2000 Met One

SuperSASS URG 3000N Vaisala HMP

155 Probe

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Wind IMPROVE IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective -- Research Research

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Other Other

Monitor type(s) -- IMPROVE IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model RM Young

5305

Anemometer -- --

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 07/01/1993 04/25/2001 04/25/2001

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 114 Site Photos

Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG S upersite two shelters,

roof top, and meteorol ogical tower – 08/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 115 Meadview

The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the north end of

Meadview, AZ, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily

desert. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about

96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingma n. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID 21298

Street Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444

County Mohave Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 36.0193

Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -114.0684

Distance to roadway 100 m – E Elevation 902 m

Traffic count 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date 09/04/1991

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 09/04/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview shelter – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 116 Miami Golf Course

This site is the location of the TSP-Pb mon itor in Miami, AZ. Freeport McMoRan Copper and

Gold Inc also maintains two particulate matter mon itors at the site. The site is located near the

Cobre Valley Country Club with residential areas to the sout h and east and the Freeport

McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID 16629

Street Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.4190

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8296

Distance to roadway 230 – E Elevation 1000 m

Traffic count n/a Site Es tablished Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Pb PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Tisch TE8550-BL TSP Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 7/26/2012 06/08/2011 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 07/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 117 Miami Jones Ranch

This site is one of three SO 2 

### sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc

operate a SO 2 

### instrument at this site as well. The site is located south of the town of Miami and

is over 3 km south/southwest of the smelter. The site located in the desert hills over looking

the town and is off a gravel/dirt road.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-0011 ADEQ ID 16631

Street Address Cherry Fl ats Rd. Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3853

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8673

Distance to roadway n/a Elevation 1,242 m

Traffic count n/a Site Es tablished Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Ecotech

EC9850T

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 02/01/2013

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Jones Ranch Fenced Miami Jones Ranch site – 03/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 118 Miami Ridgeline

This is one of three SO 2 

### site in the Miami area. The site is located inside on private property

off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ridge , which slopes in a

northerly direction toward the town of Mi ami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport

McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintain a PM 10 

### monitor at the site. The Freeport

McMoRan smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 16382

Street Address 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3992

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8589

Distance to roadway 40 m – N Elevation 1,085 m

Traffic count 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo 43C

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 10/05/1995

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 05/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 119 Miami Townsite

This site is one of three SO 2 

### sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc

run a SO 2 

### instrument at this site as well. This site is located on the western side of Miami, near

the center of the town. There is a church to th e west and a Police Station to the west with

residential to the north and south. The road is lo cated to the south of the site. The smelter is

over 2 km to the northwest of the site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-0012 ADEQ ID 16382

Street Address Sullivan ST & Davis Canyon Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3973

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8744

Distance to roadway 16.5 m - SE Elevation 1,042 m

Traffic count 470 – Sullivan St Site Established Date 0/01/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Ecotech

EC9850T

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 02/01/2013

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Townsite Fenced Miami Townsite – 05/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 120 Nogales Post Office

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately

670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Bo rder. The surrounding area is a mixture of

commercial and residential land use. Th is site is used to meet the PM 2.5 

### collocation

requirement.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID 16511

Street Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621

County Santa Cruz Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Nogales Latitude 31.3372

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -110.9367

Distance to roadway 14 m – NW Elevation 1,176 m

Traffic count 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1980

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Highest

Concentration Highest

Concentration

Monitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS QA Collocated

Instrument

manufacture and model Met One BAM

1020 Thermo

Partisol 2000 Met One BAM

1020 Thermo

Partisol 2000

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 04/01/1999

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective -- --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 08/11/2011 01/01/1980

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 121 Site Photos

Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteor ological monitors on

roof of Nogales Post Office – 04/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 122 North Mountain Summit

The site is located on a mountaintop in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix. The

high-resolution digital camera faces South Mountain, which lies 27 km to the south. The

pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet

at http://phoenixvis .net/index.aspx . The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north

and west and residential with some comm ercial activity to the south and east.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16480

Street Address West side of 7 t h 

### St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ

County Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855

Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722

Distance to roadway 850 m – E Elevation 625 m

Traffic count 28,210 – 7 t h 

### St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Visibility

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) --

Instrument

manufacture and model CANON EOS

Rebel T2i

Spatial scale Urban

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial view of North Mountain Summit Camera located on tower at North Mountain

Summit – 04/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 123 Organ Pipe National Monument

The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1 km

south/southwest of the national monument vis itor center, which is about 35.4 km south of

Why, AZ. The site is about seven meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters

east of a small mountain range. The surrounding ar ea is predominately desert. This is an

IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID 16681

Street Address SR 85 & Puer to Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 31.9499

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.8010

Distance to roadway 400 m – E Elevation 505 m

Traffic count 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date 01/01/1971

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 01/15/2003

Site Photos

Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 05/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 124 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant

The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south

of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. In

2011 the meteorological instruments were re-located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical

Lime Plant South site was closed. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, the surrounding

area is predominately desert. The Chemical Li me Plant is not operational at this time.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID 16391

Street Address SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3658

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7309

Distance to roadway 50 m – S Elevation 1,278 m

Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date 01/01/1985

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Vaisala HMP

155 Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Middle Middle Middle

Monitor Start Date 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 12/01/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and meteorological tower

at Paul Spur CLP – 03/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 125 Payson Well Site

The site is located in the southern area of Pays on, at a water well site. To the southeast of the

site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land

use. Directly to the west, on th e other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290

meters to the east is SR 87. This site is currently used to meet the PM 10 

### collocation

requirement. This site will be moved west to a more open area on the water well property

within the next year and PM 10 

### BAM instrument will replace the Partisol instrument.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID 16317

Street Address 204 W. Ae ro Dr. Payson, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.2294

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.3297

Distance to roadway 80 m – S Elevation 1,501 m

Traffic count 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1991

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### PM2.5 Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Public

Information -- --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS Special Purpose -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo Partisol

2000 Met One

E-BAM Vaisala HMP

45C Probe RM Young

5103

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1991 05/16/2012 05/30/1991 05/30/1991

Site Photos

Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and

particulate monitor on platform – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 126 Petrified Forest National Park

The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1. 6 km north of park headquarters. The park sits

along I-40 and the surro unding area is desert.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473

Street Address I-40 & Petrified Forest R d. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ

County Apache Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 35.0770

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690

Distance to roadway 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m

Traffic count 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from

IMPROVE website – date unknown

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 127 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver

The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holid ay Inn Hotel near 2 n d



### Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital

4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of resi dential and commercial.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16829

Street Address 3600 N. 2 n d 

### Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4901

Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.0767

Distance to roadway 25 m – E Elevation 337 m

Traffic count 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Bext Temp R/H

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and

model Optec LVP-2

Transmissometer

Receiver Rotronics

MP101A

Probe

Spatial scale Urban Urban

Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992 01/01/1994

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer

Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel

rooftop – 12/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 128 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter

The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19 t h 

### Avenue and

Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn Hotel 4.5 km to the southeast.

The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16330

Street Address 2000 W. Betha ny Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5253

Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.1019

Distance to roadway 120 m – S Elevation 340 m

Traffic count 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Bext

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) --

Instrument

manufacture and

model Optec LVP-2

Transmissometer

Spatial scale Urban

Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer

Transmitter Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter

Pathway – 2005

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 129 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station

The site is operated by USFS. The site is lo cated on a hilltop south of Young, AZ, within the

Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest. The surrounding area is a transitional

zone between desert and forest. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID 16446

Street Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.0908

Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude -110.9419

Distance to roadway 250 m – N Elevation 1,587 m

Traffic count 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 02/10/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger

Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station –

09/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 130 Prescott College AQD

The site is located at Prescott College on th e rooftop of the Mogoll on Building (#307). The

surrounding area is residential a nd commercial, with a high tra ffic street approximately 20

meters to the east and large trees to the west.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID 133011

Street Address 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5467

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.4761

Distance to roadway 8 m – E Elevation 1,591 m

Traffic count 17,650 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date 12/05/2006

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Public

Information

Site type(s) Max O 3



### Concentration Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS Special

Purpose

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo 49C Met One

E-BAM

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 03/25/2008 07/13/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD –

06/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 131 Prescott Valley

The site is located on the Prescott Police Depa rtment building about 1,100 meters to the north

of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly resi dential with some ar eas of open desert.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 18392

Street Address 7601 E. Civic Ci r. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5950

Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -112.3310

Distance to roadway 25 m – S Elevation 1,556 m

Traffic count 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date 03/12/2003

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison

Site type(s) General /

Background General /

Background

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

Partisol 2000 Thermo

Partisol 2000

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 03/16/2003 12/28/2007

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott

Police Department – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 132 Queen Valley

The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the

Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small town of Queen

Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primaril y desert. This is a downwind PAMS type 3

site. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID 16394

Street Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219

County Pinal Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.2938

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2857

Distance to roadway 87 m – W Elevation 668 m

Traffic count 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1998

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### NOy VOC Temp/RH

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Research Research --

Site type(s) Downwind Downwind Downwind Downwind

Monitor type(s) SLAMS,

PAMS PAMS PAMS --

Instrument

manufacture and model Teledyne API

400E Thermo 42C

TL Reactive ATEC 8001 Vaisala HMP

45C Probe

Spatial scale Regional Re gional Regional Regional

Monitor Start Date 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 06/23/2003

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Wind IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective -- Research

Site type(s) Downwind Other

Monitor type(s) -- IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model RM Young

5103

Anemometer --

Spatial scale Regional Regional

Monitor Start Date 06/23/2003 04/30/2001

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 133 Site Photos

Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter and meteorological tower at Queen

Valley site – 02/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 134 Rillito

In February of 2007 the site was moved from th e Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its

current location at a city water pumping stati on. The surrounding area is primarily residential

and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 meters to the northeast. The s ite is located within

the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximate ly 500 meters to the north/northwest of the

Cal Portland Rillito Cement Plant.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 16499

Street Address 8840 W. Robi nson St. Rillito, AZ 85653

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.4143

Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.1545

Distance to roadway 7 m – S Elevation 626 m

Traffic count 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1985

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison -- --

Site type(s) Source

Oriented Source

Oriented Source

Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Vaisala HMP

45C Probe RM Young

5103

Anemometer

Spatial scale Middle Middle Middle

Monitor Start Date 01/03/1985 03/30/2010 01/08/2004

Site Photos

Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate

monitors on platform – 04/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 135 Saguaro National Park East

The site is located within the Saguaro Nati onal Park East, 805 meters south of park

headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is

scattered residential to the west and desert to the east.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID 16474

Street Address 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.1740

Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -110.7360

Distance to roadway 82 m – W Elevation 938 m

Traffic count 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date 06/04/1988

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 06/04/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from

IMPROVE website – date unknown

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 136 Saguaro National Park West

The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by the NPS.

The area surrounding the site is re sidential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to

the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 km southwest of I-10. This is an IMPROVE

protocol site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID 16475

Street Address N. Sandario Rd. a nd W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.2485

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2175

Distance to roadway 27 m – W Elevation 718 m

Traffic count 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date 12/29/1996

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Other

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 04/19/2001

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP West Shelters at Saguaro NP West site – 07/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 137 Sedona Fire Station AQD

In 2011, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was move d from the Sedona Post Office site to the

Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emi ssions affecting the monitor. The

Sedona Fire Station site is lo cated approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona

Post Office site. The surrounding area is com posed of residential and commercial use.

Site Information

AQS ID None ADEQ ID 142818

Street Address 310 Fore st Rd, Sedona, AZ 86336

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.8683

Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -111.7633

Distance to roadway n/a Elevation 1,326 m

Traffic count n/a Site Es tablished Date 12/16/2011

Monitoring Information

Pollutant PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) Special

Purpose

Instrument

manufacture and model Met One

E-BAM

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 12/16/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Se dona Fire Station E-BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station –

3/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 138 South Phoenix

The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is

situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of

residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are locate d north and west of

the site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID 16377

Street Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041

County Maricopa Groundcover Asphalt

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4030

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0750

Distance to roadway 83 m – W Elevation 330 m

Traffic count 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information

Pollutant VOC

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) UATMP

Instrument

manufacture and model ATEC 8001

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 8/5/2001

Site Photos

Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South

Phoenix site – 04/2005

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 139 Sycamore Canyon

The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal

obstructions exist in the area su rrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the

area surrounding the site. Sycamor e Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID 16476

Street Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond)

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.1406

Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.9692

Distance to roadway 33 m – NW Elevation 2,046 m

Traffic count 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date 09/11/1991

Monitoring Information

Pollutant IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective Research

Site type(s) Background

Monitor type(s) IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model --

Spatial scale Regional

Monitor Start Date 09/11/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 140 Tonto National Monument

The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National

Forest at the base of Tonto National Monumen t, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area

surrounding the site is desert with Roos evelt Lake about 1 km to the north.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID 16447

Street Address South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545

County Gila Groundcover Dirt/Rock

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.6547

Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.1074

Distance to roadway 17 m – NE Elevation 786 m

Traffic count 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date 04/23/1988

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### IMPROVE

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison Research

Site type(s) Downwind Background

Monitor type(s) SLAMS IMPROVE

Instrument

manufacture and model Teledyne API

400E --

Spatial scale Regional Regional

Monitor Start Date 05/22/2002 04/23/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 08/2013

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 141 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory

The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The

surrounding area is a both resident ial and commercial, with an open field directly to the

northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202).

Site Information

AQS ID 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID 16363

Street Address 600 N. 40 t h 

### St. Phoenix, AZ 85008

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4553

Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.9961

Distance to roadway 66 m – E Elevation 356 m

Traffic count 12,740 – 40 t h 

### St. Site Established Date 04/01/1987

Monitoring Information

Pollutant

Bscat/PM2.5 Delta Temp Horizontal

Solar

Raditation Ultraviolet

Solar

Radiation

Basic monitoring

objective Public

Information Research Research Research

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- PAMS PAMS PAMS

Instrument

manufacture and model Optec NGN 2

Nephelometer RM Young

7627 Li-Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR

UV

Spatial scale Urban Neighbor hood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 06/25/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Temp R/H Wind

Basic monitoring

objective -- --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) -- --

Instrument

manufacture and model Rotronics

MP101A

Probe RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 05/11/1999 05/11/1999

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 142 Site Photos

Aerial view of Vehicl e Emissions Laboratory Meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL –

12/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 143 Yuma Supersite

The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air qual ity monitors in the

Yuma area to one site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro

Administration Facility propert y. The surrounding area is commer cial and industrial, with a

dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 km to the northeast. In addition to NAAQS compliance,

the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone.

Site Information

AQS ID 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 113219

Street Address 2323 S. Ariz ona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364

County Yuma Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Yuma Latitude 32.6903

Surrounding Area Commercia l/Industrial Longitude -114.6144

Distance to roadway 91 m – W Elevation 60 m

Traffic count 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date 02/01/2006

Monitoring Information

Pollutant O 3 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Temp/RH

Basic monitoring

objective NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison NAAQS

Comparison --

Site type(s) Max O 3



### Concentration Population

Exposure Regional

Transport Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS --

Instrument

manufacture and model Teledyne API

400E Thermo

TEOM

1400AB Met One BAM

1020 Vaisala HMP

155 Probe

Spatial scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 03/17/2010

Monitoring Information

Pollutant Wind

Basic monitoring

objective --

Site type(s) Population

Exposure

Monitor type(s) --

Instrument

manufacture and model RM Young

5305

Anemometer

Spatial scale Neighborhood

Monitor Start Date 03/17/2010

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 144 Site Photos

Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Meteorological Tower at Yuma

Supersite – 11/2012

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 145 

## Appendix E – Criteria Pollutant Mi nimum Monitoring Requirements

This appendix contains tables th at summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for

each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO).

Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix-Me sa-Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not included

within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs.

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 146 O 3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Tabl e D-2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O 3

.

MSA County 2010 Census

Population 2010-2012

8-hr Design

Value (ppb) Design Value Site # of Required

Monitors # of Active

Monitors # of Additional

Monitors Needed

Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 69 Flagstaff Middle School 1 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 69 Prescott College AQD 1 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 77 Yuma Supersite 1 1 0

Lake Havasu-Kingman Moha ve 200,186 N/A N/A 0 0 0

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, and Tonto National Monument.

_________________________________________________________________________

PM 2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 a nd Table D-5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 2a Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 2.5 SLAMS. (FRM/FEM/ARM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.1 and Table D-5)

MSA County 2010 Census

Population 2010-2012

Annual

Design

Value

( μ g/m 3 ) Annual

Design Value

Site 2010-2012

Daily

Design

Value

( μ g/m 3 ) Daily Design

Value Site # of

Required

Continuous

Monitors # of Active

Continuous

Monitors # of

Additional

Continuous

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 Flagstaff

Middle School 12 Flagstaff

Middle School 0 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.0 Prescott

Valley 9 Prescott

Valley 0 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 Yuma

Supersite 15 Yuma

Supersite 0 1 0

Lake HavasuKingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office.

Table 2b Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM 2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non-FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.2)

MSA County 2010 Census

Population 2010-2012

Annual

Design

Value

( μ g/m 3 ) Annual

Design Value

Site 2010-2012

Daily

Design

Value

( μ g/m 3 ) Daily Design

Value Site # of

Required

Continuous

Monitors # of Active

Continuous

Monitors # of

Additional

Continuous

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 Flagstaff

Middle School 12 Flagstaff

Middle School 0 1* 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.0 Prescott Valley 9 Prescott Valley 0 1* 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 Yuma

Supersite 15 Yuma

Supersite 0 1 0

Lake HavasuKingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0

* Continuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMs, or ARMs

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office.

_________________________________________________________________________

PM 10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Tabl e D-4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 10

. MSA County 2010 Census

Population 2010-2012 Max

Concentration

[ μ g/m 3 ] Max Concentration Site # of

Required

Monitors # of Active

Monitors # of Additional

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 61 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 274 Yuma Supersite 1-2 1 0

Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 185 Bullhead City 0-1 1 0

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Pl an: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas Red Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Gol f Course, Miami

Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Li me Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite.

_________________________________________________________________________

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 147 NO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO 2

. CBSA 2010 Census

Population 2009

Max

AADT

Counts # of

Required

Near-road

Monitors # of Active

Near-road

Monitors # of

Additional

Near-road

Monitors

Needed # of

Required

Area-wide

Monitors # of Active

Area-wide

Monitors # of

Additional

Area-wide

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff 134,421 40,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None

Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite

EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None

_________________________________________________________________________

SO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO 2

. CBSA County 2010 Census

Population 2008 Total

SO 2 1

[tons/year] Population Weighted

Emissions Index 2

[million persons-tons

per year] # of

Required

Monitors # of Active

Monitors # of

Additional

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 539 70 0 0 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2272 490 0 0 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 185 36 0 0 0

Lake Havasu – Kingman Mohave 200,186 319 62 0 0 0

1 Using NEI data

2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO 2 and dividing product by one million

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline.

EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None

_________________________________________________________________________

CO

(Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for CO.

CBSA 2010 Census

Population # of Required

Near-Road

Monitors # of Active

Near-Road

Monitors # of Additional

Monitors

Needed

Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0

Prescott 211,033 0 0 0

Yuma 195,751 0 0 0

Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 0 0 0

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite

EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None

_____________________________________________________________________________

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2013, Page 148 Pb

(Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore.

NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census

Population # of

Required

Monitors # of Active

Monitors # of Additional

Monitors Needed

JLG Supersite Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale 4,192,887 1 1 0

Table 7b. Source-Oriented Pb Monitoring (including airports)

Source Name Address Pb Emissions

(tons per

year) Emission

Inventory

Source &

Data Year Max 3-Month

Design

Value*

[ μ g/m 3 ] Design Value

Date

(third month,

year) # of

Required

Monitors # of Active

Monitors # of

Additional

Monitors

Needed

ASARCO LLC -- 3.87 ADEQ

2011 0.27 June, 2011 1 1 0

Freeport

McMoRan Copper

and Gold Inc. -- 4.87 ADEQ

2011 0.06 April, 2011 1 1 0

*consider data from the past 3 years.

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None

EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None

### Page 2 of 2

cc: Meredith Kurpius, USEPA, Region 9

Michael Flagg, USEPA, Region 9

Theresa Rigney, ADEQ

Figure 1 Aerial photograph of current PM 10 

### monitor location at Payson Well Site

Figure 3.3

‐ 2 Google Earth Image of the proposed PM 10 

### monitor location at Payson

Well Site