alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      9
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    3,876
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        8
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                         14,466
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               9,969
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    1,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      1,000
<LOANS>                                  55,491
<ALLOWANCE>                                 630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           92,089
<DEPOSITS>                               72,073
<SHORT-TERM>                                  0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         510
<LONG-TERM>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 20,765
<OTHER-SE>                               (1,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           92,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           1,121
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           144
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            141
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          1,406
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          336
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          336
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     1,070
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           1,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              65
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   65
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                 30
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             7.96
<LOANS-NON>                                 109
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            602
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 0
<RECOVERIES>                                 13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           630
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        630
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-6622.

#### Mark Cubie, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 536,

181 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7748.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 368.
No. 11-320.

#### James Linn Higerd, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 521,

181 L. Ed. 2d 350,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7794.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 54 So. 3d 513.
#### H. C. Sanders and Thomas J. Heiter, Administrator *ad litem,*for Thelma H. L. B. Prince, Deceased, *Appellants,*v. W. W. Goodrum, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 13, 1926.

*Z. D. Green, A. F. Cornelius*and *G. II. Cornelius,*for Appellants.

*H. S. Glazier,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.-

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seem to the court that there is. no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Order of Suspension of Trading; Infotex Holdings, Ltd.

July 23, 1998.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Infotex Holdings, Ltd. (``Infotex'') because of questions regarding the 
accuracy of statements, and material omissions, concerning among other 
things, (1) the nature and value of current contracts which Infotex 
claims to possess, and (2) the relationship between Infotex and an 
analyst who recommended purchase of its shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. eastern time on July 
23, 1998 through 11:59 p.m. eastern time on August 5, 1998.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20237 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10529 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ERIC J. LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-296-T - - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eric J. Leon appeals his conviction for mail fraud, arguing that it violates double jeopardy because property owned by him was forfeited through summary forfeiture proceedings prior to his criminal indictment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's reasons for rejecting Leon's double jeopardy challenge and find no reversible error. AFFIRMED.
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, Month XX, 2018*

*Change 10*

**DIC FTB FORMAT**

**REPLY TO FOLLOW-UP FOR MATERIEL RETURN PROGRAM CREDIT**

140

APPENDIX 3.24

1
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Michigan Tech Research Institute - Exemption/Rulemaking
October 4, 2021 DLA-SM-22-3200

ANNUAL MATERIALS PLAN FOR FY 2022 

The Defense Logistics Agency-Strategic Materials today announced the Fiscal Year 2022 

Annual Materials Plan (AMP) for potential acquisitions. The FY 2022 AMP is effective 

October 1, 2021 and will expire September 30, 2022.

Annual Materials Plan for FY 2022 (Potential Acquisitions)

Material Unit

Ceiling 

Quantity

Antimony MT 1,100

Carbon Fibers LBS 5,000

Cerium MT 550

Dysprosium MT 20

Electrolytic Manganese Metal MT 5,000

Electric Steel MT 3,200

Graphite MT 900

Lanthanum MT 1,300

Neodymium MT 600

Praseodymium MT 70

Rare Earth Magnet Block MT 100

Rayon MT 600

RDX/HMX/TNT LBS 2,000,000

Samarium Cobalt Alloy MT 50

Tire Cord MT 2,000

Titanium MT 1,500

Yttrium MT 25

Materials listed are Potential Acquisitions and quantities listed are 

ceilings. www.dla.mil/strategic-materials
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                        Certification of Chief Executive Officer
              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    May 10, 2006                              /S/   ROBERT E. MANNE
                                                   ------------------------------
                                                         Robert E. Manne
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3314 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3314

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, as the 
  ``Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAKE HAVASU CITY COMBAT VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lake 
Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3314

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, as the 
  ``Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

THE SALVATION ARMY, )

MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION, a New )

York corporation; and THE SALVATION )

ARMY, FLORIDA DIVISION, a Georgia )

corporation, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4973

)

CONSTANCE C. POTTER-MICCOLY, )

as personal representative of the Estate of ) 

Robert Peter Miccoly, Sr.; and BONNIE )

MASSOIA, as successor trustee of the )

Robert P. Miccoly, Sr. revocable trust ) 

dated 9/21/11, ) 

) 

Appellees. ) 

)

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Deno G. Economou, Judge.

Allan P. Whitehead and Erika McBryde of 

Frese, Whitehead & Anderson, P.A., 

Melbourne; and Stephen P. Heuston of 

Heuston Legal, PLLC, Melbourne, for 

Appellants.

Jeffrey S. Goethe and M. Brandon 

Robinson of Barnes Walker, Goethe, 

Hoonhout, Perron & Shea, PLLC, 

Bradenton, for Appellee Constance C. 

Potter-Miccoly; and David F. Wilsey of 

Fisher and Wilsey, P.A., Saint Petersburg, 
- 2 -

for Appellee Bonnie Massoia, as successor 

trustee of the Robert P. Miccoly, Sr. 

revocable trust dated 9/21/11.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
No. 11-280.

#### Global Industrial Technologies, Inc., Petitioner v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, et al.

565 U.S. 1014, 132 S. Ct. 551,

181 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8067.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 201.
No. 11-356.

#### Lufkin Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Sylvester McClain, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 589,

181 L. Ed. 2d 423,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8265.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 374.
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


CoCASA (Comprehensive Clinic Assessment Software Application)


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





CoCASA Reports										Related Pages
										tools iconCoCASA Algorithm ReferenceDescribes the algorithms that CoCASA uses to produce reports...clipboard iconCore CoCASA Assessment ReportsSummary report, diagnostic reports, lists invalid doses...
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  January 17, 2019					Content source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases CoCASA Home
Install CoCASA
Version History
Reports
Algorithm Reference
Core Assessment Reports nipcocasa@cdc.gov
800-803-5212
 Vaccines & ImmunizationsImmunization Quality Improvement for Providers (IQIP) ProgramImmunization Information Systems (IIS)Vaccines for Children Program (VFC)


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
August 27, 2015

Mr. Mark Carmonne

2453 Eastwood Dr ive

Carson City, NV 89701

Dear Mr. Carmonne :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2340 on June 17, 2015

, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the foll owing:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
No. 11-6691.

#### Danielle Biton, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 561,

181 L. Ed. 2d 405,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7967.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Jennifer Ziolkowski, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofSolid Biosciences Inc.; and 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: March 13, 2020  By: 
/s/ Jennifer Ziolkowski
   Jennifer Ziolkowski   
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCELLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-BNK4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, DanielBober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do herebycertify that: 

 

1.          A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thisCertificate as of the 28th day of February 2018. 

 

/s/Daniel Bober 

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-5504.

#### Rizwan Saeed, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 321,

181 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5921.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 598.
Order entered January 24 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00888

- CR

JOE LYNN WILLIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F12

- 56320

- R



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On January 15, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why
appellant’s brief ha d not been filed. On January 22, 2014, we received appellant’s brief, together

with an exte nsion motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the
January 15, 2014 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the January 22, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed

as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JU STICE
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40547-40548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20184]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for a Study of Jazz Artists

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to the award of a Cooperative Agreement for a study of Jazz 
Artists in four cities. The cities will be chosen from among the 
following pairs: New York/Philadelphia, Detroit/Kansas City, Atlanta/
New Orleans, San Francisco/Los Angeles. The issues to be considered 
will include venues for performance, distribution of work through 
recordings, education and training, and extent of participation in 
health insurance and retirement programs. Those interested in receiving 
the Solicitation should reference Program Solicitation PS 98-06 in 
their written request and include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal 
requests for the Solicitation will not be honored.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 98-06 is scheduled for release 
approximately August 17, 1998 with proposals due on October 19, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Hummel, Grants & Contracts Office, National Endowment for the 
Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania

[[Page 40548]]

Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20506 (202/682-5482).
William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements and Contracts.
[FR Doc. 98-20184 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M