alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7766** 

EUGENE KING , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ROBERT M. STEVENSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 0:12

- cv - 01130

- TLW )

Submitted : February 6, 2013 Decided: February 12, 2013

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Eugene King , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eugene King seeks to appeal the district court ’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition with out prejudice as an unauthorized second or successive § 2254 petition. King filed the petition the same month he filed his first § 2254 petition. As he has explained in his objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation and on appeal, he did not in tend to file two § 2254 petitions but rather sought to obtain a clock

- stamped copy of his petition from the district court for his records. The district court docketed the numerically second petition in a new action, and the magistrate judge recommended d ismissing the petition as successive even though the first petition was still pending and had not been adjudicated. We grant a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether the district court erred in dismissing the instant petition as an unauthoriz ed second or successive petition within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (2006), but we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the petition without prejudice on the ground that it was improvidently docketed as a new petition. We deny a certificate of appealability on any other issues raised by King. Accordingly, we grant in part and deny in part King’s motion for a certificate of appealability, and we deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with3 oral argument because the facts and le gal contentions are adequately presented in the material s before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### mr Ien. l&s!mh~

fmelgn aountry.

ahcwaater

uho holda a **pmPeralonr1** nume ramentr *re eqlM1 to vi&I81 qualificetloas ent to thone squired in this law, liaenseto pmatloe rutming In **ut** exmination, **provldd a**  **See of**  **rs** Is paid **to** tha bwxt¶ **by** wuh appll-

### 484

m-n. ElinmenWsah, Page 2

We fall to find any Fequlrmaentof citiaenshipes 8 gu%liPlcetlm for beaocdlxq 6 reglcrtered

mwae under Texas **l&W.** We therefarebald that (ID. elien map be rsgfsteredLX? the &her st%tutoq$requlslteeme aolpplled vith. It la our further opinionthat the lengusge "ecaother State" (ID

umd In the above **quoted atatute,**  **refera to**  **and mans,**  **“ another**  state 0P **the Uuited**  **Statea ”** 

**. It**  ir themdbre ourvlwthetneither an sllea 0 a altleen mey be lseued e reglstrotlonaertiflceta underArticle 4521 unlenshe or she holds a regintretloncertltlcateProa Pnother State of the United States.

Inreachlngthir oonclu8tonue are notuna&ndPul of them&Wok&e me%nlngsvhloh h%vo b%en %sar~bedto tho ward

Se% T~JCW v. Uhlte, 7 U%ll. 700, 19 L. Ed. 227. Howeter, t&h majorityrule meem to be that in the abeeaao of eoam**thing ia**  **the rtetute**  ttself~.ixxliccting e aontrery intent or utaieso P brandermeenlng lo required

### tc give edeat to the 

### provision, 8 etate 

### 8tatute u8ing thl8 term vi11 be held to lnokwle oalye member 0P theUnlm. Thle rtrlat or nerrov definition la vell aetebliehedin United Stetor ooxmtitutlonel mad Btatuk West Tema Ry. Co. our inte~Pet4tlon OP appwrrr In Article 4521 la Purtheratreqthened by referenorto the otiginelAat Pros8 vhlah the acxXSi8reoP one Bevlmed Stetuteo of 1925 **took the**  **prQVblO?I.** Sea. 10, Ch. 1133, p. 413, 

### rats 1923, 38th Leg. ueed the phmee Vr.om smother stete m territory"end the aodlflere dropp%d "a- territory"th%r&rtm. "Skate or territory"1s e phrase that hae been fmquentlg uwd In the walprmal provlsis~ **JS** atate liaenslng**stetutes end**  the **vcwd “**  **tcrmltwy ”**  oleo her a veil estebllshedmeaning in Unlted Yteter aon8tltutlonal and tttatutory

iav. Zx part% Hcmgan, 23 8. 298. It 6eeme oleo* to ua that lea

the ebeenae of mything in the **statute which**  vwld lndlmte a 

### aontFory intent, the Leg$slrrture wmd tlae

vex@ 

### "State* lo 1t.a llatlted

coc~tltutioael

een8e 8e reParr1~ to enother atrrte cd' the &serlo%nUnion.
We h>pe our v:ws in this mattervi11 aaseat the bawd in d%elLngwith these pWbl%xim.
Ycurn very truly
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3854 STANDARD 29.49 -1.17 -0.05

Tolerance

3854A

(removed)

THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 31.28 -0.93 0.39 1.79 0.24 0.44 1.33

3854B

(removed)

THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 30.33 -1.15 -0.66 0.84 0.02 -0.61 1.01

1 3854C THIN ORANGE 

LIMIT 31.34 -1.13 0.22 1.85 0.04 0.27 1.26

2 3854D THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 30.99 -0.57 0.63 1.50 0.60 0.68 1.60

3 3854E FULL RED 

LIMIT 28.57 -0.51 -0.20 -0.92 0.66 -0.15 1.14

4 3854F THIN VIOLET 

LIMIT 30.94 -0.83 -0.08 1.45 0.34 -0.03 1.03

5 3854G FULL BLUE 

LIMIT 29.12 -0.94 -0.90 -0.37 0.23 -0.85 1.29

3854H

(removed) ORANGE LIMIT 30.1 -0.78 0.65 0.61 0.39 0.7 1.22

6 3854I GREEN LIMIT 30.30 -1.90 -0.15 0.81 -0.73 -0.10 1.18

Shade Number SLATE GRAY 548 Piece/Roll Number 3854

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 15, 2023

Fabric Nomenclature BERET, 100% WOOL CR-PD 01-09

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


*Dated:
                May 9, 2008*
            By:
            /s/*Edward
                A. Cespedes**Edward
                A. Cespedes**Chief
                Financial Officer*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Wesley
Whiting,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, CFO

Dated: December 9, 2004
(1) Adjusting Price $21.76 CWT

(2) Base Price $20.81 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.95

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0817

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0408

Price change per quart $0.0204

Price change per pint $0.0102

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0077

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0064

Price change per half pint $0.0051

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.08

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: November 3, 2013
Exhibit 99.2




Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,
the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Partnership for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Bruce M. Johnson
--------------------
Bruce M. Johnson
May 8, 2003





















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Regency Centers, L.P., and will be retained by Regency Centers,
L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 15.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Zai Lab Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Cho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:June 25, 2019

| By: | /s/ William Cho |
|-----|-----------------|

William Cho

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III             
|                      |  |  |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                 
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Gary M. Adams                    
|                      |  |  |  | Gary M. Adams                        
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President                
|                      |  |  |  | and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Child Support Enforcement Financial Report and Program 
Quarterly Report of Collections.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: This report is used by States to report the 
collections of child support payments made under Title IV-D of the 
Social Security Act during each fiscal quarter. The form also reports 
the portion of the collected payments to be distributed to the 
custodial parent or to the Federal or State governments. The 
information is used to calculate quarterly grant awards, annual 
incentive payments to the States and is published in an annual report 
to Congress.
    Respondents: States, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands and the 
District of Columbia.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Number of     Average               
                                                               Number of    responses      burden       Total   
                         Instrument                           respondents      per       hours per      burden  
                                                                            respondent    response      hours   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
396A........................................................           54            4            8        1,728
34A.........................................................           54            4            8        1,728
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,456.
    Additional Information: AC is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by September 1, 1998. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling 
the Administration for Children and Families, Reports Clearance 
Officer, Bob Sargis at (202) 690-7275.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for AC, Office of Management and 
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.

    Dated: July 23, 1998.
Bob Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-20254 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Frank Gonzales, alias “Cheeko,” *Plaintiff in*Error, vs. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

144 So. 311.

Opinion filed October 22, 1932.

*122
      *C. S. Ellis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error, Prank Gonzales, was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County of the offense of having procured for prostitution and having feloniously caused to he prostituted an unmarried female under the age of sixteen years, in violation of Section 7578 C. G. L., 5435 R. G. S. Writ of error was taken to the sentence of ten years imprisonment imposed.

There is no direct evidence in the transcript to the effect that the female alleged to have been prostituted was an unmarried female and the brief of the Attorney General concedes the proposition that unless this Court can hold that from the evidence the jury could reasonably have inferred that the female named in the information was unmarried at the time of the alleged procurement, the judgment of the trial court must he reversed, for the question of .whether or not the female named was unmarried at the time of the offense was an essential element required to be proven by substantial evidence, either direct or circumstantial.

Neither does it appear by any substantial evidence found in the transcript sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty, that the female named was *procured or caused to be prostituted,*the term “prostitution” as used in this statute meaning the leading of an unmarried female into unchastity and involves a financial element. See construction placed upon a similarly worded act of the United *123States making it a felony for anyone knowingly fo transport or cause to be transported in interstate or foreign commerce any woman or girl for the purpose of *prostitution.*Johnson v. United States, 215 Fed. 679.

Upon the whole record justice will be subserved by awarding a new trial and it is so ordered.

Eeversed for a new trial.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs specially.

Brown, J.

I concur in the holding that the case must be reversed for lack of evidence to prove that the female in question was unmarried, which is, under the statute an essential element of the offense charged. But this was, in my estimation, the only reversible error. I think there was enough evidence to sustain the verdict in so far as the other element of the offense is concerned.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.54-1 APPENDIX 8.54

AP8.54. APPENDIX 8.54

DEFENSE AUTOMATIC ADDRESSING SYSTEM

MATERIEL OBLIGATION VALIDATION RESPONSE 

TRANSACTION1

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC AP8.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter RIC SGA.

Submitting Activity 7-12 Enter Department of Defense 

activity address code (DoDAAC)

of applicable activity.

Blank 13-80 Leave blank.

1 Use of revised Materiel Obligation Validation (MOV) temporary suspension procedures for selected 

activities last reported as not implemented by USMC. Refer to AMCL 37.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 14, 2003
No. 11-7466 (11A497).

#### Paul Ezra Rhoades, Petitioner v. Randy Blades, Warden.

565 U.S. 1048, 132 S. Ct. 608,

181 L. Ed. 2d 446,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8293.

November 17, 2011.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), we, W. Thomas Parrington, the Chief Executive Officer and Linda
Borchert Philp, the Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and after reasonable inquiry:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  LODGIAN, INC.By:
    s/ W. Thomas ParringtonW. THOMAS PARRINGTONPresident and Chief Executive Officer By:
    s/ Linda Borchert PhilpLINDA BORCHERT PHILPExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: May 10, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Lodgian, Inc. and will be retained by Lodgian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| (logo)  ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite 800  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK2017-BNK5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK5 (the“Trust”)

 

I,Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer(the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to Morgan StanleyCapital I Inc.and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intentthat they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.            I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year between January 1,2017 and December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) andthe CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: February6, 2018

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Master Servicer

 

 

 

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
Tin Offering

Item/Lot

1760

Brand

Long Horn 

Tin Content %

99.8

Lead Content %

0.05

Net Wt. (Lbs)

176,370

Metric Tons

80

Min. Bid (Lbs)

11,023.10

Location

Hammond, IN

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Unit of Measure................... Lbs Offering Posting Time............

April 09, 2024

April 10, 2024

9:30am

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2024

Basic Ordering Agreement... Tin Date of Posting...................

Grade................................. A Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Quality

A