alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Howard R.Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family DollarStores, Inc., (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

·                  the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended August 26, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

·                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2007

 
| /s/ Howard R. Levine |                                              |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Howard R. Levine                                  |
|                 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |
|                      |                                                   |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Family DollarStores, Inc., and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc., and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0336

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GINA DELIGHT KRUEGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve her opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2022

03/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0336
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009      
|                        
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 1 5180 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________
D .C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr - 00053

- WS

- B

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TERRANCE DWAYNE WILLIAMS, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________ (May 22, 2020) B efore WILLIAM PRYOR , JI LL PRYOR and MARCUS , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Williams ’s plea agreement is GRANTED. As the record reflects,

Case: 19-15180 Date Filed: 05/22/2020 Page: 1 of 32 Williams knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. During the plea colloquy, the court specifically questioned him about the waiver, and in describing it, the court told Williams that he was “waiving [his] right to appeal [his] conviction and sentence either by filing a direct appeal or a co llateral appeal, with the following limited exceptions: . . . punishment in excess of the statutory maximum, any punishment constituting an upward departure of the guideline range, and any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Williams acknowledged that he understood the waiver’s terms. Thus, the record establishes that Williams knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the sentence appeal waiver. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (holding that a sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily). Further, no exception to the appeal waiver applies. Williams’s 151

- month prison sentence did not exceed the applicable guideline range, and it did not exceed the statutory maximum penalty. Williams also has not raised any issues of ineffective assistance of counsel. Moreover, Williams’s counsel filed an Anders brief conceding that the appeal waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily, thus barring his appeal. Finally, although Williams obj ected to his career

- offender status during sentencing, an enforceable appeal waiver is not made unenforceable by issues disputed at sentencing and waives the right to appeal debatable legal

Case: 19-15180 Date Filed: 05/22/2020 Page: 2 of 33 issues. See U nited States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1296 (11th C ir. 2006) ; United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion to dismiss Williams ’s appeal pursuant to the sentence appeal waiver. DISMISSED

. Case: 19-15180 Date Filed: 05/22/2020 Page: 3 of 3
No. 10-11023.

#### Manuel Salinas-Soto, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 204,

181 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6010.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 464.
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President,
Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		May 15, 2006
No. 11-53.

#### Solange Chadda, Petitioner v. Tom Block.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 246,

181 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5445.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Semana Nacional 

de Inmunización Infantil

CON SALUD, TODO ES POSIBLE. 

VACUNE A SUS HIJOS.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Gene W.
Ray, the Chief Executive Officer of The Titan Corporation (the "Company"), and Mark W. Sopp, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

Dated:
March 16, 2005

|/s/GENE W. RAYGene W. Ray Chief Executive
Officer |  | /s/MARK W. SOPPMark W. Sopp Chief Financial
Officer
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
April 5, 2022 DLA-SM-22-3211

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR March 2022

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during March 2022.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

2322 $7.77 M

David J. Joseph

Company, Veritas 

Alloys & Metals

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST NO 

SALES

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001

Lbs W 198,072 $3.23 M *

Zinc Amendment 001 Lbs

NO

SALES

Tin Amendment 001 MT NO

SALES

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
No. 11-371.

#### Nick C. Tran, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 528,

181 L. Ed. 2d 352,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7755.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 227.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.15-1 APPENDIX 8.15

AP8.15. APPENDIX 8.15

FORCE-CLOSED MATERIEL RELEASE 

CONFIRMATION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC ARH.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter the RIC of the source of supply 

generating this transaction.

Media and Status 7 Enter the M&S code from the materiel 

release order (MRO).

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter the NSN or part number from the 

MRO.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter the U/I from the MRO.

Quantity 25-29 Enter the quantity from the MRO.

Document Number 30-43 Enter the document number as shown in 

the MRO.

Suffix 44 Enter the suffix code contained in rp 44 of 

the MRO. If rp 44 in the MRO is blank, 

leave blank.

Supplementary Address 45-50 Enter the SUPADD as shown in the MRO.

Blank 51-56 Leave blank.

Date Shipped1 57-59 Enter date released/tendered to carrier; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Blank 60-76 Leave blank.

Mode of Shipment2 77 Enter the code identifying the mode of 

shipment3; otherwise, leave blank.

Blank 78-80 Leave blank.

1 For U.S. forces, leave blank. For Security Assistance, may contain the release date from the materiel 

receipt acknowledgement (MRA).

2 For U.S. forces, leave blank. For Security Assistance, may contain the mode of shipment from the 

MRA.

3 Refer to the TRDM for available code list at URL: https://trdmws.maf.ustranscom.mil/trdm/index.html

(DTR Data)
No. 11-6042.

#### Jesse Collins, Petitioner v. City of Jacksonville, Florida.

565 U.S. 982, 132 S. Ct. 506,

181 L. Ed. 2d 357,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7817.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 54 So. 3d 973.
No. 11-5833.

#### Brian Copeland, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 350,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6955.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 16 A.3d 974.
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6 

WARRANT AGREEMENT 
 Between 

 

			
		  	
		  	
		  	
	Hereafter “the Company”	  	Hereafter “the Selected Participant”

 either or both of which may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

 WHEREAS: 
  

	 	1.	The Company has adopted a warrant plan ( “the Plan”) that provides for the grant of Warrants; 

  

	 	2.	The Plan was adopted at the extraordinary shareholders meeting held on April 23, 2014; 

  

	 	3.	The Board of Directors of the Company has decided to grant Warrants to the Selected Participant; 

  

	 	4.	The Parties wish to enter into a written agreement whereby the conditions of the grant of the Warrants are defined; 

  

	 	5.	The Plan shall be an integral part of this Agreement. This Agreement will also serve as “Subscription form” for the purposes of the Plan. 


The Parties therefore agree to the following: 
 Article 1.
Grant of Warrants 
 In accordance with the terms and conditions as stipulated in the Plan and this Agreement, the Company hereby offers a total of
         Warrants to the Selected Participant, who hereby accepts                  Warrants which have as a result been granted.

 Article 2. Date of the Offer 
 The Date of the Offer,
as defined in the Plan, is July 1st, 2014. 
 Article 3. Exercise Price of Warrants 

The Exercise Price per Warrant is €8.81. 
 Article 4:
Term of the Warrants 
 The Term of the Warrants ends 10 years after the date of the decision to issue the Warrants. 

Article 5: Vesting and Exercisability of the Warrants 

5.1 Vesting of the Warrants 
 The Warrants
will be vested according to the rules set forth in Section 4.2.5. of the Plan. 
 5.2 Exercisability of the Warrants 

The Warrants can be exercised as stipulated in the Plan, in particular in Section 4.3.5 (Exercise periods) and Section 4.3.11 (Exercise procedure). 







 5.3 Number of Warrants that may be exercised during the Exercise Period 

The Warrants granted to a Selected Participant can only be exercised during an Exercise Period if they are vested as stipulated in Section 4.2.5 of the
Plan. 
 5.4 Termination of the employment agreement or the director’s mandate 

In case of a termination of the employment agreement or director’s mandate of the Selected Participant, only such Warrants will be exercisable as set
forth in section 4.3.6.1 of the Plan. 
 In witness thereof, Parties have signed this agreement 

on                      [date] 

 

					
	  
	 		 	  

	The Company	 		 	The Selected Participant
	Materialise NV	 		 	                     [name]
Defense Logistics Agency

The Nation’s Combat Logistics Support Agency

Small Business Innovation Programs

Explored Innovations

Securing Resources for US Defense & Commercial Industries 

TOPIC NUMBER:

DLA182-001

TOPIC TITLE:

Rotorcraft Fuel 

Bladder Weight and 

Total Ownership 

Cost Reduction 

CONTRACT 

NUMBER:

SP4701-18-P-0125

SBIP COMPANY:

Response 

Technologies 

West Warwick, RI

TECHNICAL 

PROJECT 

OFFICE:

DLA Aviation

PUBLISHED:

2019

Response Technologies Redesigns the Flexible Fuel Cell

Response Technologies is redesigning a decades-old technology used daily by the United

States military – the flexible fuel cell. Current manufacturers use the same WWII-era

subtractive production process, which does not capitalize on advanced manufacturing

techniques, capabilities or efficiencies. Response Technologies incorporated innovative,

forward-thinking manufacturing methods, including additive manufacturing and

materials engineering. The result is a seamless, crashworthy, ballistically-tolerant and

self-sealing fuel cell that is universally fuel compatible. The prototype will be tested on

FORCE READINESS AND LETHALITY & SUPPLY CHAIN 

INNOVATION

Flexible Fuel Bladder. Image provided by Response Technologies, 2018

Made in the USA

the Sikorsky H60 Blackhawk and the

Bell UH-1Y Venom helicopters.

The design improvements are

potentially lifesaving, cost effective and

reduce procurement lead time – all

benefits that have a direct impact on

warfighter and weapons system

readiness.

In addition to the operational

advantages, this design dramatically

reduces the likelihood of supply chain

obsolescence due a number of key

features. The redesigned cell:

1. Extends service utility by 50 percent;

2. Reduces total weight by 20 percent;

3. Reduces total ownership costs by 40 percent;

4. Reduces manufacturing lead time by 4 times;

6. Reduces future procurement costs by 20 percent;

7. Meets or exceeds the ASTM D471 test for Fuel Resistance due to its compatibility with

bio and synthetic fuels;

8. The technologies derived reduce new product design lead times by 8xs.

The fuel cell, will be the first to meet or exceed all criteria for qualification under MILDTL-27422F.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.
No. D-2593.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of F. Richard Losey.

565 U.S. 974, 132 S. Ct. 545,

181 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7920.

October 31, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 564 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 3053, 180 L. Ed. 2d 869, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4580.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43362

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

BRITTNEY MARIE MENDEL aka BENEDICT ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 437

Filed: March 17, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed

. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for a ppellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM Brittney Marie Mendel was found guilty by a jury of batter y on a law enforcement
officer, felony, Idaho C ode § § 18

- 915(3),

- 903(a) . The district court imp osed a unified five

- year sentence, with two years determinate, suspended the sentence

, and placed Mendel on probation

for five years. Mendel appeals, contending the district court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a withheld judgment.

After a person has been convicted of a crime, a district court may, in its discretion, withhold judgment. I.C. § 19

- 2601(3); State v. Trejo , 132 Idaho 872, 880, 979 P.2d 1230, 1238
(Ct. App. 1999). The refusal to grant a withheld judgment will not be deemed an a buse of discretion if the trial court has sufficient information to determine that a withheld judgment2

would be inappropriate. State v. Edghill , 134 Idaho 218, 219, 999 P.2d 255, 256 (Ct. App. 2000)
(quoting State v. Geier , 209 Idaho 963, 965, 712 P.2d 66 4, 666 (Ct. App. 1985) ) . Factors that
bear on the imposition of sentence also apply in review of the discretionary decision to withhold judgment. Geier , 209 Idaho at 965, 712 P.2d at 666. Denial of a withheld judgment may be
justified merely by the natu re of the crime. Trejo , 132 Idaho at 880, 979 P.2d at 1238 (deliberate shooting showed withheld judgment to have been properly denied). Prior to sentencing, the
district court reviewed the trial audio tapes and the presentence investigation. Based on the record, the district court’s denial of Mendel’s request for a withheld judgment was not an abuse

of discretion.
Therefore, Mendel ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 10-733.

#### Donald M. Schulz, et ux., Trustees of 1980 Schulz Living Trust, as Amended, et al., Petitioners v. Jason King, Nevada State Engineer.

562 U.S. 1201, 131 S. Ct. 1053,

178 L. Ed. 2d 866,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 987.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.

Same case below, 126 Nev. 754.
No. 11-6320.

#### Kenneth G. Thompson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 968, 132 S. Ct. 473,

181 L. Ed. 2d 304,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7519.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 805.
No. 10-11290.

#### Raymond Mendez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 877, 132 S. Ct. 239,

181 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6932.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*136Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 209.
No. 11-5427.

#### Jeffrey Mathew Jeanetta, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 906, 132 S. Ct. 310,

181 L. Ed. 2d 190,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6169,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1163

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Southern District of Iowa. * Thomas George Freeman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 2010 Filed: April 16, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Thom as Freeman challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervisedrelease. Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation se ntence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accord ance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S.-2- 220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
DAVID LAMPE 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twelfth day of December 

1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as supervisory Supply Systems Analyst in the 

Office of Systems Automation and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his 

tenure at DISC from 1962 to 1994. Mr. Lampe was an innovative developer of numerous automated 

information and operations systems which were utilized throughout DISC and exported to other 

centers within DLA. Some of the major system development efforts which he conceived, developed 

and implemented include the Selective Management Category Code (SMCC), Requisition 

Optimization, Prioritization, Contract Expedite Status System (CESS), Pre-Recommended Buy 

Acquisition Planning (PREBAP), Recommended Buy Sequencing System (RBSS) and the Gradient 

Inventory Model (GIM). 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/lampe.htm 1/21/2016
(logo)CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

 

**UBS CommercialMortgage Trust 2017-C1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,**

**Series 2017-C1 (the“****Trust****”)**

 

           

I,James P. Shevlin, on behalf of CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as SpecialServicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to UBS Commercial mortgageSecuritization Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with theknowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.      I(or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

 

2.      Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

Date: March 1, 2019

 

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

 

By:/s/ James P. Shevlin 

Name:James P. Shevlin

Title:President/Chief Operating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814