alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19844]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-099]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that StreamCor Inc., of Pittsburgh, 
PA, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the invention 
described and claimed in NASA Case No. LAR 15637-1, entitled 
``MAGNETICALLY SUSPENDED FLUID PUMP AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME,'' for 
which a U.S. Patent Application was filed by the United States of 
America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant 
of a license should be sent to Langley Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by September 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hillary T. Womack, Patent Attorney, 
Langley Research Center, Mail Stop 212, Hampton, VA 23681-0001; 
telephone (757) 864-8882; fax (757) 864-9190.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-19844 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
No. 11-6702.

#### Keith Russell, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 561,

181 L. Ed. 2d 405,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8008.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 832.
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Charter Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/ Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
November 10, 2010
| Name of Subsidiary             | State of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|
|                           |                   |
| Barry Scott Companies, Inc.(1) | Delaware               |
| Blast Acquisition Corp.        | Delaware               |
| Blast BSA Inc. (2)             | New York               |
| Blast DA, Inc. (2)             | Delaware               |
| Intandem Corp.                 | New York               |
| Kingstone Insurance Company    | New York               |
| CMIC Properties, Inc.          | New York               |
| 15 Joys Lane, LLC              | New York               |
| Payments Inc.                  | New York               |

| (1)   | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Blast Acquisition Corp. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Barry Scott Companies, Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

| (3)   | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingstone Insurance Company |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | A wholly-owned subsidiary of CMIC Properties, Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------|
No. 11-5686.

#### Scott Leslie Carmell, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 409,

181 L. Ed. 2d 268,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7283.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 331 S.W.3d 450.
TABLE 3. Percentage of persons aged 65 years who reported receiving influenza or pneumococcal vaccine, 

race/ethnicity*, poverty status†, education level, and number of physician contacts during the previous 

National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1998‡

Characteristic

Received influenza vaccine during previous 12

mos Ever received pneumoc

Non-Hispanic

white

(n=4,934)

% (95% CI§)

Non-Hispanic

black

(n=667)

 % (95% CI)

Hispanic

(n=532)

% (95% CI)

Non-Hispanic

white

(n=4,832)

% (95% CI)

Non-Hispan

black

(n=650)

% (95% C

Poverty status

 At or above poverty level Below poverty level

67.5 (±1.8)55.3 (±4.5)

45.7 (±6.5)42.9 (±9.9)

56.6 (±6.8)49.0 (±10.1)

51.6 (±2.0)40.4 (±5.1)

30.7 (±6.18.0 (±6.

Education level

 Less than high

 school

 High school More than high school

61.1 (±2.9)66.3 (±2.5)68.6 (±2.5)

45.1 (±5.1)39.1 (±9.6)46.9 (±7.8)

51.4 (±7.1)46.8 (±12.9)66.0 (±12.5) 

46.0 (±2.9)48.5 (±2.8)53.5 (±2.7)

22.4 (±4.433.8 (±9.29.7 (±8.

No. physiciancontacts during theprevious 12 mos None 1 

 2-3

4-9

10

33.5 (±5.5)56.9 (±4.7)67.4 (±2.9)70.2 (±2.3)72.1 (±3.0)

20.4 (±11.3)25.1 (±11.3)46.0 (±8.4)54.2 (±7.1)49.5 (±9.6)

¶

43.0 (±14.2)42.9 (±10.8)62.2 (±7.5)63.6 (±9.5)

21.2 (±4.3)41.1 (±4.9)45.9 (±3.3)56.1 (±2.5)56.9 (±3.4)

¶

22.1 (±12.20.8 (±5.30.3 (±6.133.5 (±8.

Total 65.6 (±1.5) 45.8 (±4.4) 50.3 (±5.0) 49.5 (±1.6) 26.1 (±3.7

*Data are presented only for non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics because numbers for groups were too small for meaningful analysis. Persons of Hispanic origin can be of any race; however, tgroups non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black do not include persons of Hispanic origin.

†Poverty status is based on family size, number of children aged <18 years, and family income. Published 

thresholds from the Census Bureau are used in these calculation. Persons for whom poverty level was not excluded from this analysis.‡n=6,334. Sample sizes might not total 6,334 because persons with unknown vaccination status were exclu

§Confidence interval. 95% CIs were calculated by multiplying the standard error by ±1.96.¶The standard of reliability is RSE <0.3 (where RSE = the ratio of the standard error and the prevalence

not meet that standard, or the denominator was <30. 
**Meets the standard of reliability; however, <50 respondents were in the denominator.
No. 11-5646.

#### Terry Reed, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 336,

181 L. Ed. 2d 210,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6328.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 113.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp. (The
"Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey P. Jurick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


Dated: July 14, 2003


                           By: /S/ Geoffrey P. Jurick
                           Geoffrey P. Jurick
                           Chief Executive Officer


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-6827.

#### Christopher Antonio Staples, aka Christopher Antonio Ross, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 593,

181 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8218.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 444 Fed. Appx. 706.
Percentage of adults aged 19+ years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, DC, and eight Territories†, 2010

§ Chicago, IL (0%);

District of Columbia (43%);

Houston, TX (0%); 

New York City, NY (4%); 

Philadelphia, PA (3%); 

San Antonio, TX (49%).

† American Samoa (no report);

Marshall Islands (0%);

Federated States of Micronesia (17%);

Guam (13%);

N. Mariana Islands (106%);

Palau (no report);

Puerto Rico (28%);

Virgin Islands (No IIS).

National Coverage: 22% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2010 IISAR

no IIS/no report

0% - 33%

34% - 66%

67% - 94%

95%+
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) 

Subgroup

Grace M. Lee, MD MPH

VaST Co-Chair

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

January 27, 2021

Discussion and Interpretation 
Vaccine Safety Surveillance in the U.S.

 Well-established vaccine safety surveillance systems remain the 

cornerstone of COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring in the U.S.

 Novel approaches to surveillance have enriched our understanding of 

COVID-19 vaccine safety in the early phases of vaccine deployment

 VaST meets weekly to review all available data and to ensure a 

coordinated approach across multiple safety surveillance systems

2
VaST Discussion and Interpretation

 Consistent with clinical trial data, local and systemic reactions are 

commonly reported following vaccination in V-SAFE and VAERS

 During the early phase of the U.S. vaccination program (<3 months) 

–

–

–

–

Rely on data reported to VAERS

Limitations - numerator only data; descriptive; reporting bias

 During the later phase of the U.S. vaccination program

Rely on data from population-based surveillance systems (e.g., VSD, 

CMS, Genesis) to understand the risk of AESIs following vaccination

Numerator and denominator data; comparison groups available

3
VaST Discussion and Interpretation 

 Anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination is being closely monitored

–

–

–

–

Estimated rates currently range from 2.8 to 5.0 per million doses 

(using Brighton Collaboration case definition)

 In response, CDC has recommended risk mitigation strategies, including:

Screening for risk prior to vaccination

Monitoring for symptoms post-vaccination

Early recognition and management of anaphylaxis on-site 

 Provider and patient education ongoing by CDC and partners

4
5
6
VaST Interpretation and Plans

 Serious AEs following COVID-19 vaccination are being closely monitored

– Data in the U.S. and Europe suggest that case reports are consistent 

with all-cause mortality rates, particularly in frail, elderly individuals

 Anticipate additional vaccine safety surveillance systems will begin 

reporting data as we vaccinate a larger proportion of the U.S. population

 VaST will continue to update the ACIP COVID-19 vaccines workgroup, ACIP 

secretariat and ACIP on a regular basis

7
VaST Members 

Co-Chairs

Grace Lee (ACIP)

Robert Hopkins (NVAC)

ACIP Members

Beth Bell

Matt Daley

Veronica McNally

Kiepp Talbot

Expert Consultants

Kathy Edwards

Lisa Jackson

Martin Kulldorff

Laura Riley

Robert Schechter

Patricia Whitley-Williams

8 8

CDC Co-Leads

Lauri Markowitz

Melinda Wharton

Ex Officio and Liaison Representatives 

Tatiana Beresnev (NIH)

Steven Anderson; Karen Farizo; Richard Forshee; 

Narayan Nair; Hui Lee Wong (FDA)

Judith Steinberg (OIDP)

Jeffrey Kelman (CMS)

Matthew Clark (IHS)

Mary Rubin (HRSA)

Fran Cunningham (VA)

Limone Collins (DoD)

Administrative Support

Susan Hiers

Jared Woo
No. 11-5243.

#### Rodney Ray Roberts, Petitioner v. John Marshall, Warden.

565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 286,

181 L. Ed. 2d 171,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5560.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*172Same case below, 627 F.3d 768.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3291 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to ensure that any food that 

may be served as part of a reimbursable meal under the school lunch 

program or the school breakfast program may be sold in schools, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2019 

Mr. WRIGHT (for himself, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, and Mr. WATKINS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to ensure that 

any food that may be served as part of a reimbursable 

meal under the school lunch program or the school 

breakfast program may be sold in schools, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smart Nutrition And 

5 Choices for Kids and Schools Act’’ or the ‘‘SNACKS Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3291 IH

1 SEC. 2. SALE OF CERTAIN MEALS. 

2 Section 10(b)(1)(C) of the Child Nutrition Act of 

3 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1779(b)(1)(C)) is amended— 

4 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

5 (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the 

6 end and inserting a semicolon; and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(iii) ensure that the nutrition stand9 ards under this paragraph allow any food 

10 that may be served as part of a reimburs11 able meal under the school lunch program 

12 under Richard B. Russell National School 

13 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) or the 

14 school breakfast program under section 4 

15 of this Act to be sold in schools as de16 scribed in subparagraph (B).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0445

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN WADE SORLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 2, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2024

06/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0445
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RYAN LYNN HORTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 445 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3317 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3317

To permit the Scipio A. Jones Post Office in Little Rock, Arkansas, to 
    accept and display a portrait of Scipio A. Jones, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2019

Mr. Hill of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit the Scipio A. Jones Post Office in Little Rock, Arkansas, to 
    accept and display a portrait of Scipio A. Jones, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SCIPIO A. JONES POST OFFICE PORTRAIT.

    (a) In General.--The postmaster of the Scipio A. Jones Post Office, 
located at 1700 Main Street in Little Rock, Arkansas, may accept and 
display, in the lobby of such Post Office, a painting, by artist Wade 
Hampton, of a portrait of Scipio A. Jones.
    (b) Costs; Gifts.--The United States Postal Service shall not be 
responsible for any costs of carrying out subsection (a), including the 
costs of displaying the painting. The postmaster referred to in such 
subsection is authorized to accept on behalf of the Government the 
painting and any services necessary to display the painting.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5866.

#### Stephen C. Sayre, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 353,

181 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6914.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 622.
No. 11-6652.

#### James McCaw, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 538,

181 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7624.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
February 20, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENYATTA WESLEY FREDERICK, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00288-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 11-6070.

#### Robert T. Pritchard, Sr., et ux., Petitioners v. Dow Agro Sciences, et al.

565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 508,

181 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7731.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 102.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3399 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 to include 

California in the program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2019 

Mr. HARDER of California (for himself, Mr. COSTA, Mr. COX of California, 

and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

to include California in the program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NUTRIA ERADICATION IN CALIFORNIA. 

4 The Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

5 (Public Law 108–16) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 2— 

7 (A) in subsection (a)— 

8 (i) in paragraph (2), by striking 

9 ‘‘Maryland and Louisiana’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3399 IH

1 ‘‘Maryland, Louisiana, and California’’; 

2 and 

3 (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking 

4 ‘‘Louisiana. Consequently, marsh loss is 

5 accelerating.’’ and inserting ‘‘Louisiana 

6 and California. Consequently, marsh loss, 

7 loss of public and private wetlands, and 

8 loss of agricultural lands are accel9 erating.’’; and 

10 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the 

11 State of Maryland and the State of Louisiana’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘Maryland, Louisiana, and Cali13 fornia’’; and 

14 (2) in section 3— 

15 (A) by amending subsection (a) to read as 

16 follows: 

17 ‘‘(a) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Inte18 rior (referred to in this Act as the ‘Secretary’), subject 

19 to the availability of appropriations, may provide financial 

20 assistance to Maryland, Louisiana, and California for a 

21 program to implement measures to eradicate or control 

22 nutria and restore marshland, public and private wetlands, 

23 and agricultural lands damaged by nutria.’’; 

24 (B) by amending subsection (b) to read as 

25 follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3399 IH

1 ‘‘(b) GOALS.—The goals of the program shall be to— 

2 ‘‘(1) eradicate nutria in Maryland and Cali3 fornia; 

4 ‘‘(2) eradicate or control nutria in Louisiana; 

5 and 

6 ‘‘(3) restore marshland, public and private wet7 lands, and agricultural lands damaged by nutria.’’; 

8 and 

9 (C) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘State of 

10 Maryland’’ and all that follows and inserting 

11 ‘‘Maryland program, $2,000,000 for the Lou12 isiana program, and $7,000,000 for the Cali13 fornia program for each of fiscal years 2020 

14 through 2025.’’ 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5903.

#### Norman L. Mayes, Petitioner v. Maryland, et al.

565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 421,

181 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7414.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 240.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2009(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009  
|                       
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
Logistics Operations 

Customer Facing Office Update Request 

 

Instructions: 

From a web browser, download this Request to your computer.

Enter the new information in each field to be updated. Check the “No Change” box if no change is 

necessary. 

Once complete, click on the Submit button to e-mail the Request to our DLA Customer Advocates 

Team for review. 

Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

*Position Name:

City:

No Change 

State: 

No Change 

Phone: 

No Change 

DSN: 

No Change 

E-mail:

No Change 

Additional Comments: 

Reminder: Download this Request to your computer prior to completion and submission