alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-51072

_____________________

ESMERELDA AGUIRRE, Individually and as Next Friend for Jimmy

Aguirre, a minor,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

CRYSTAL CITY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; ALBERT GONZALES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CV-587

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court committed no reversible error in holding

that the injury was neither foreseeable nor caused by the

defendants. Furthermore, on the record before us, the defendants,

sued only in their official capacity, cannot be held liable because

the evidence fails to establish a policy that was the moving force

behind the constitutional violation. See Rivera v. Houston Indep.

Sch. Dist., 349 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. 2003). The district court’s

judgment dismissing the complaint is therefore AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A.
      Cespedes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*Dated:
                November 14, 2008*
            By:
            /s/*Edward
                A. Cespedes**Edward
                A. Cespedes*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
No. 11-447.

#### Dana Holland, Petitioner v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 593,

181 L. Ed. 2d 424,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8224.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 248.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Hum phreys, Beales and Powell

TIMOTHY WAYNE BRADLEY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2623-08-3 PER CURIAM MARCH 10, 2009 SOUTHERN AIR, INC. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Gregory P. Cochran; Caskie & Frost, on brief), for appellant. (John T. Cornett, Jr.; Daniel E. Lynch; Dani el E. Lynch & Associates, on brief), for appellees.
Timothy Wayne Bradley (claimant) appeal s a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his claim seeki ng to hold Southern Air, Inc. and its insurer responsible for the cost of medical treatment of his low back and left hip. On appeal, claimant contends the commissi on erred in dismissing his claim because the medical evidence proved his low back and left hip injuries constituted compensable consequences of his original October 30, 1999 right knee injury. However, our review of the commission’s opinion shows that it did not render any deci sion on the questions raised by claimant in this appeal. Rath er, the commission based its denial of claimant’s May 2, 2007 claim for benefits for medical treatment of his low b ack and left hip solely upon its findings that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations co ntained in Code § 65.2-601, as it was not filed within two years from the date of claimant’s compensable accident and that his May 2007 claim did not constitute an amendment to the initial April 26, 2000 claim for benefits. The commission

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - did not address the compensable consequences issues now raised by claimant on appeal, and claimant failed to file a motion for reconsiderati on or rehearing in order to request that it do so. Accordingly, we will not address whether the low back and left hip injuries constituted compensable consequences of claimant’s orig inal injury for the first time on appeal. See Rule 5A:18. “Although Rule 5A:18 allows exceptions for good cause or to meet the ends of justice, appellant does not argue that we should invoke these exceptions [and] [w]e will not consider, sua sponte , a ‘miscarriage of justice’ argument under Rule 5A:18.” Edwards v. Commonwealth , 41 Va. App. 752, 761, 589 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2003) ( en banc ) (citation omitted). Because claimant does not challenge the co mmission’s specific findings that his May 2007 claim for medical treatment of his low back and left hip was barre d by the statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2- 601, as it was not filed within tw o years from the date of his compensable accident, and that his May 2007 claim was not an amendment to the initial April 26, 2000 claim for benefits, those findings are bi nding and conclusive upon us. Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s decisi on without addressing the merits of the questions raised by claimant. We dispense with oral argument a nd summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
W8086B-8094-6129

TODO R GRA AEERBREEEEE BB BEREEEEBERERREEERERRBABREEERRER 2 3
34a] ef 7} ef FS] of 7] af fof rt) 34] 5] 6} 7] af of of2]2p3] ap 5] 6] 7] 8] of of 2]253 af sf of 74a] ayo TOTAL PRICE SHIPPED FROM SHIP TO
S| supPLe- }S] F | pis | PRO | PRIRI C|
co : ui avanti mentaRY / U | raiau} JECT | ont pel [aay] | SoU ETS DOLLARS __ Acts
q@ ADDRESS] @ TION TY | DATE! D CETSA See Block 27
As EA 00010 > 04 NA H $_51,40 $ 514-00
<, MARK FOR:
24. DOCUMENT NUMBER & SUFFIX (30-44) BOC DATE] 6. NMFC 7 ERT RATE . TYPE CARGO PS
8094
| | | | Hi | Hl HI De TO.QTY REC'D [11.UPK ] 12. UNIT WT. 73. UNIT CU T4UFG PS.SL
/ 16. FREIGHT CLASSIFICATION NOMENCLATURE
W8086B-8094-6129 chs
25. NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER & ADD (8-22) a7, ITEM NOMENCLATURE
CLOTHING, SPECIAL PURPOSE, DEMIL A
| || | iil HI | | | | lil II | | 18. TYCONT  ]19.NOCONT | 20. TOTAL WEIGHT 21. TOTAL CUBE
8415-DSSPCLOTA 23. DATE REC'D
Y-17-08&
26. IUC (4-6) Ul (23-24) QTY (25-29) COND (71) DIST (55-56) UP (74-80)
REL # Copy 1
LIN I]
EA 00010 H 0051400
27. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY LISTED HAS KBA
NO REASONABLE PROSPECT OF USE AND ITS REPAIR OR INV QTY
DRMO COLUMBUS REHABILITATION AS A UNIT IS CLEARLY IMPRACTICAL. IT HAS
INSP BY
JAMES RD GATE BLDG 9 STATION 8 WON SChAP OR anvAGe AND IT IS THEREFORE TURNED
3990 E. BROAD STREET : SESE
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ONE COPY
COLUMBUS , OH 43213 FOR DISCREPANCY REPORTING USE SF 364 DD FORM 1348-1A

We certify and verify that the AEDA residue, Range Residue, and/or Explosive Contaminated property listed has been 100 percent properly
inspected by us and to the best of our knowledge and belief, are inert and/or free of explosives or other dangerous materials.

Certified By:

- |

Verified By;

Name —

Name (Signature)

Printed Name / Job Title

USA CETSA

BUILDING 221, DOOR 7

BLUEGRASS STATION PO BOX 14064
Lexington, KY 40512

DSN: 745-3861

Printed Name / Job Title

USA CETSA

BUILDING 221, DOOR 7

BLUEGRASS STATION PO BOX 14064
Lexington, KY 40512

DSN: 745-3861
# 2022 IISAR

# 2022 Codebook
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3144 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 302
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3144

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 7, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ``Jose Ramos 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSE RAMOS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jose Ramos Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jose Ramos 
Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 302

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3144

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ``Jose Ramos 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
No. 11-6557.

#### Victor Lechuga-Guerrero, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 991, 132 S. Ct. 532,

181 L. Ed. 2d 373,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7647.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 295.
No. 11-6424.

#### Zakaria Ajlane, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 557,

181 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8042.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

GREEN 474 STANDARD 30.79 -6.77 7.70

KHAKI 475 STANDARD 46.75 1.59 13.50

COYOTE 476 STANDARD 39.22 5.62 16.93

1 3974A FULL RED 

LIMIT -1.57 0.32 -0.73 1.16

BLACK 477 STANDARD 18.09 0.59 -2.14

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 30, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature UNIFORM, COMBAT UTILITY, WOODLAND MARPAT, 

PERMANENT PRESS PERMETHRIN TREATED MIL-PRF-MCCUU

Shade Number WOODLAND MARPAT Piece/Roll Number 3974
No. 11-6625.

#### Aaron Perkins, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 537,

181 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7690.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 U.S. App. D.C. 241, 642 F.3d 1062.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

ENERGY

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6222

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL FEDERAL CIVILIAN AND NON-DOD CUSTOMERS

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Cost Plus Rate

This memorandum provides the official Cost Plus Rate for DLA Energy petroleum products 

managed under the Defense Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2021 as $0.06 per gallon. The 

rate published is intended to remain in effect throughout the fiscal year.

Thank you in advance for your support to make our mission successful. Support to our 

customers with the highest quality, priority service and lowest price is our top priority and 

utmost concern.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Kevin Robinson at (571) 767-0027.

 RICHARD R. SNINSKY

 Director

 DLA Finance Energy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,729
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,025
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     59,940
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               000
<LOANS>                                        153,870
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,485
<DEPOSITS>                                     213,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,653
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,108
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,416
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 242,485
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,367
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  985
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,352
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,552
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,617
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,735
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    696
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         696
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          000
<NET-INCOME>                                       516
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.18
<LOANS-NON>                                        489
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    77
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       78
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,698
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,643
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             55


</TABLE>
No. 11-6134.

#### Brian Pruitt, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 955, 132 S. Ct. 431,

181 L. Ed. 2d 279,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7161.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 155.
FUEL CAPITALIZATION WORKSHEET

ORGANIZATION AND ACTIVITIY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION

1. Organization/Activity Name 2. Inventory DODAAC 3. Routing ID Code (RIC)

4. Mailing Address 4a. Physical Address 

(If different from mailing 

address)

POINT OF CONTACT (POC) INFORMATION

5a. Email Address: 5b. DSN:

5c. Commercial Phone: 5d. Fax:

6. Alternate POC Name and Title:

6b. DSN:

6c. Commercial Phone: 6d. Fax:

6a. Email Address:

5. Primary POC Name and Title:

7. Responsible Officer(RO), Terminal Manager

(TM), or Property Administrator Name and Title:

8. Primary BSM-E Processor Name and Title:

8c. Commercial Phone: 8d. Fax:

8a. Email Address: 8b. DSN:

9c. Commercial Phone: 9d. Fax:

9a. Email Address: 9b. DSN:

10c. Commercial Phone: 10d. Fax:

10a. Email Address: 10b. DSN:

11c. Commercial Phone: 11d. Fax:

11a. Email Address: 11b. DSN:

12c. Commercial Phone: 12d. Fax:

12a. Email Address: 12b. DSN:

13c. Commercial Phone: 13d. Fax:

13a. Email Address: 13b. DSN:

7c. Commercial Phone: 7d. Fax:

7a. Email Address: 7b. DSN:

9. Alternate BSM-E Processor Name and Title:

10. Quality Manager Name and Title:

11. Ordering Officer Name and Title:

12. Records Custodian Name and Title:

13. Legal Officer/Counsel Name and Title:

14. System Administrator Name and Title:

14a. Email Address: 14b. DSN:

14c. Commercial Phone: 14d. Fax:

DLA FORM 2023, NOV 2018 REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITION PDF DLA

Prescribed by: DoDM 4140.25, Vol 6, Sec 7 

Sponsor: DLA Energy
FUEL CAPITALIZATION WORKSHEET (continued)

Products Information

15. Bulk/Aviation Products:

15a. Estimated Requirement (Annual):

15b. Source of Supply (list CLIN or supporting DFSP):

16. Ground Products:

16a. Posts, Camps, and Stations (PC&S) 

Contract Line Items to be Capitalized: 

 

 

(List CLINS below product grade code) 

16b. PC&S CLINS to Remain 

Uncapitalized 

 

 

(List CLINS below product grade code) 

17. Name and Title of Requesting Official: 17a. Requesting Official Signature: 17b. Date:

DLA FORM 2023, NOV 2018 REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITION PDF DLA
EX-4.19



 Exhibit 4.19 

Company Name: Viryanet Ltd. 

P.C.: 511281354 
 Date:
June 17, 2014 
 To 
 Bank Mercantile Discount Ltd.

 Meitar Branch 
 Dear Sir/Madam, 

Re: Undertaking 
  

			
	Whereas	  	You are about to grant to us, according to our request, credits, loans and other banking services; and
		
	Whereas	  	You requested, among other things, that we give you our undertaking as set forth below, which refers to the adjusted financial statements of the Company;

 Therefore we undertake the following to you: 
  

	 	1.	The balance of the accounting equity at all times shall not be less than 20% of the total balance sheet and in any event shall not be less than the sum of 2.2 million dollars, and this commencing with the financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 2013 and thereafter. 

 “Accounting equity” in accordance with
accepted and customary accounting principles in Israel, applicable by any law on the Company, as they are presented in the financial statements of the Company. 
  

	 	2.	Our undertaking set forth in Section 1 above, is in addition to all prior and/or other undertakings that we signed and/or will sign, we or the shareholders of our Company, in your favor in any document, and not to
derogate from them. 

  

	 	3.	If we breach or fail to fulfill our above undertaking, you shall be entitled to demand from us the immediate payment of all the sums that we owe and/or will owe to you in connection with any credits and/or loans and/or
banking services and/or undertakings of any kind, in whole or part, whether the due date has passed or whether it has yet to pass or alternatively, to remedy the breach of this undertaking to the bank’s satisfaction. 


 

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	/s/ ViryaNet Ltd
	Viryanet Ltd.









 ATTORNEY’S CONFIRMATION 

I the undersigned, Avi Vaknin Adv. Hereby confirm that a resolution was adopted lawfully and in accordance with the incorporation documents of the Viryanet
Ltd. Company (hereinafter: “the Company”) to sign on the above Undertaking. 
 The Undertaking was signed before me by the authorized parties of
the Company and their signature obligates the Company. 
 Messrs. Nir Diskin, Etti Chaklay signed on behalf of Viryanet Ltd. 

 

			
	 Aba Hillel Silver 16, Ramat Gan
	 	 Avi Vaknin

	 Attorney’s Address
	 	Attorney’s Signature and Seal
No. 11-6154.

#### Kelly Smoak, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 955, 132 S. Ct. 429,

181 L. Ed. 2d 280,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7151.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3331 

To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2019 

Mr. ZELDIN (for himself and Mrs. LURIA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Countering Hizballah 

5 in Lebanon’s Military Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEBANESE 

7 ARMED FORCES AND HIZBALLAH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall sub10 mit a report to Congress— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3331 IH

1 (1) identifying all military officers, com2 manders, advisors, officials, or other personnel with 

3 significant influence over the policies or activities of 

4 the Lebanese Armed Forces who are members of, 

5 paid by, or significantly influenced by Hizballah; and 

6 (2) describing military activities conducted by 

7 the Lebanese Armed Forces to disarm Hizballah 

8 pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolu9 tion (UNSCR) 1701 (2006). 

10 (b) FORM.—The report required by section (a) shall 

11 be submitted in an unclassified form but may have a clas12 sified annex. 

13 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON SECURITY ASSISTANCE. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts appropriated or 

15 otherwise made available for security assistance for the 

16 Government of Lebanon for a fiscal year, 20 percent may 

17 not be obligated or expended for such purpose until the 

18 President certifies to Congress that— 

19 (1) the Lebanese Armed Forces has taken 

20 measurable steps in the last year to limit the influ21 ence or expel anyone identified pursuant to section 

22 2(a)(1); 

23 (2) the activities described pursuant to section 

24 2(a)(2) demonstrate a serious commitment by the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3331 IH

1 Lebanese Armed Forces to fulfill its obligation to 

2 disarm Hizballah pursuant to UNSCR 1701; and 

3 (3) the Lebanese Armed Forces have not co4 operated, coordinated, or partnered with Hizballah 

5 in any operation, campaign, or military exercise dur6 ing the last year. 

7 (b) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.—The President 

8 may waive the certification requirements under para9 graphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) if the President cer10 tifies to Congress that it is in the national security interest 

11 of the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-5173.

#### Marvin Jerome Fasthorse, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 278,

181 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5622.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 1182.
No. 11-264.

#### Christopher P. Borst, Petitioner v. Missouri.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 510,

181 L. Ed. 2d 348,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7732.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.

*349Same case below, 337 S.W.3d 95.
No. 11-6569.

#### Joel Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 992, 132 S. Ct. 533,

181 L. Ed. 2d 374,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7616.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 126.