alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-227.

#### Syrian Arab Republic, Petitioner v. Francis Gates, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Olin Eugene “Jack” Armstrong, Jr., et al.

565 U.S. 945, 132 S. Ct. 422,

181 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7352.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 U.S. App. D.C. 128, 646 F.3d 1.
I tried to quit smoking 

many times. 

Thankfully, you only have 

to quit for good once.

John B., age 61, South Carolina

John tried to quit smoking many times but would often start again, until he met with a 

doctor who helped him create a plan. She prescribed two quit-smoking medicines and 

recommended counseling. John smoked his last cigarette at age 38.

You can quit. 

For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW

Scan for free resources 

to help you quit smoking Developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Charter Welton L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,116,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  974,938<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,346,075<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,346,075<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            (1,336,711)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               658,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,995,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,995,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,995,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $906,618 and interest
receivable of $68,320.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $470,344 and net option premiums
of $(215,869).
<F3>Liabilities include accrued brokerage fee of $109,254, redemptions
payable of $128,135, and accrued management fee of $31,215.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $(2,096,441), net
change in unrealized of $470,344 and interest income of $289,356.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3314 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3314

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, as the 
  ``Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAKE HAVASU CITY COMBAT VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lake 
Havasu City Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Draft Agenda 

CDC/ASTDR Consultation on the Implementation of CDC’s Moving Forward Initiative 

February 9, 2023

4:00–5:00 pm (EST) 

4:00          Welcome and Opening Remarks from CDC/ATSDR

4:10          Overview of the Implementation of CDC’s Moving Forward Initiative

4:15          Input and Comments from Tribal Leaders 

4:50         Summary and Closing Prayer

5:00         Adjourn Meeting
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-135219) pertaining to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 21, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31137 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILSON SAM, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-60002-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wilson Sam appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for food stamp fraud, money laundering, and criminal forfeiture. He argues that the district court erred in refusing to grant a downward departure due to his advanced age and poor health. Because the district court’s refusal to grant a downward departure was not the result of a violation of law or a misapplication of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court’s refusal toNo. 97-31137 -2- grant a downward departure. United States v. Guajardo , 950 F.2d 203, 207-08 (5th Cir. 1991). Sam also argues that the district court erred in imposing the maximum sentence within the applicable Guideline range without considering his advanced age or poor health and without stating reasons as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). The district court considered Sam’s arguments concerning his age and health and determined that the maximum sentence within the applicable Guideline range was appropriate. See Guajardo , 950 F.2d at 207- 08. Because the applicable guideline range spanned exactly 24 months and did not exceed 24 months, the district court was not required to state reasons for imposing the particular sentence under § 3553(c). See § 3553(c)(1); United States v. Richardson , 925 F.2d 112, 117 (5th Cir. 1991). However, even if the district court was required to state reasons for imposing the particular sentence, the district court articulated sufficient reasons in stating that Sam’s conduct was “reprehensible and immoral in the manner in which [he] used others in order to cover [his] tracks.” The district court further stated that Sam should not be allowed to “manipulate the system” in the future.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38785-38786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-113; RM-9296]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Tumon, GU

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Guam 
Broadcast Services, Inc., proposing the allotment of Channel 280A at 
Tumon, Guam, as the community's first local aural transmission service. 
Channel 280A can be allotted to Tumon in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city reference 
coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 280A at Tumon are North 
Latitude 13-30-25 and East Longitude 144-48-05.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as follows: Robert J. 
Rini, Esq., Rini, Coran & Lancellotta, P.C., 1350 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036 (Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-113, adopted July 1, 
1998, and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.

[[Page 38786]]

    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19306 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
No. 11-6117.

#### Samuel Villegas Lopez, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 577,

181 L. Ed. 2d 426,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8095.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 1198.
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 3, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature MICROFLEECE

Shade Number FOLIAGE GREEN 504 Piece/Roll Number 3726

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3726 43.42 -2.84 3.56

Tolerance

1

3726-A

VIOLET 

LIMIT -1.18 0.64 -0.35 1.0

2 FULL BLUE 

LIMIT -2.29 -0.21 -0.64 1.41

3

FULL 

GREEN 

LIMIT -1.40 -0.85 -0.90 1.69

4 YELLOW 

LIMIT 0.26 -0.40 0.66 0.87

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SAMPLES READ 2 TIMES AND 

AVERAGED
**Exhibit 23.6**

** **

**VIA SEDAR / EDGAR**

** **

**Ontario Securities Commission, as Principal Regulator**

**British Columbia Securities Commission**

**Alberta Securities Commission**

**United States Securities and Exchange Commission**

** **

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

** **

**Annual Information Formfor the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, incorporated by reference into the Company’s Prospectus Supplementdated October 10, 2017 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated June 29, 2017 (the “Prospectus Supplement”) andthe Annual Report incorporated by reference into the Company’s registration statement on Form F-10 (Registration No. 333-218076)(the “Registration Statement”)**

**Consent of Qualified Person**

 

Reference is made to the Annual Reporton Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 of the Company (the “**Form 40-F**”), filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Reference is also made tothe Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “**AIF**”), and its incorporationby reference: (i) into the Prospectus Supplement, and (ii) as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the Form 40-F.

 

I hereby consent to the: (i) inclusionof each of the summary section of the report entitled “*NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, YauricochaMine, Yauyos Province, Peru*” dated effective July 31, 2017 (the “**Yauricocha Technical Report**”), thesummary section of the report entitled “*NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Bolivar Mine, Mexico*”dated effective February 28, 2017 (the “**Bolivar Technical Report**”), and the summary section of the report entitled“*Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources, Cusi Mine, Mexico*” dated effective August 31, 2017 (the “**CusiTechnical Report**”) in the AIF and any amendments thereto, and the incorporation of such reports in the AIF, (ii) incorporationof the AIF in the Form 40-F and any amendments thereto, and in the Company's Registration Statement, including the prospectus containedtherein, as amended or supplemented, (iii) incorporation by reference of the AIF and any amendments thereto, into the ProspectusSupplement and (iv) being named in, and the use of the Yauricocha Technical Report, the Bolivar Technical Report and the Cusi TechnicalReport or portions thereof prepared, reviewed and/or approved by me, in the AIF and Form 40-F.

 

I also hereby confirm that I have readthe AIF and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derivedfrom the Yauricocha Technical Report, the Bolivar Technical Report or the Cusi Technical Report or within my knowledge as a resultof the services I performed in connection with the Yauricocha Technical Report, the Bolivar Technical Report or the Cusi TechnicalReport.

 

[*Signature page follows*]

 

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2018
No. 11-6821.

#### Michael Doughty Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 568,

181 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8056.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 254.
No. 11-6370.

#### Brandon Howard Griffin, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 969, 132 S. Ct. 468,

181 L. Ed. 2d 305,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7574.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 574.
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) and 15D-14(A),


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kurt D. Ogden, certify that:


1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Venator Materials PLC; and


2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2020


/s/ Kurt D. OgdenKurt D. OgdenChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6125-4]


Interstate Lead Company Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed de minimis settlement and modification of 
consent decree.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to settle claims for 
response costs at the Interstate Lead Company (ILCO) Superfund Site 
located in Leeds, Alabama with the City of Leeds. EPA will consider 
public comment on the proposed settlement for thirty (30) days. EPA may 
withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

DATES: Written comments may be submitted to Mrs. Kim Dao-Vu at the 
below address on or before August 17, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A copy of the proposed settlement is available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Atlanta 
Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303, 404/562-
8887.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition, the EPA intends to request the 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to 
modify the Consent Decree relating to the ILCO Superfund Site entered 
in U.S. v. Alpert Iron & Metal, et al, Case No. CV-97-AR-0001 to add 
the following parties as Defendants in such matter:

Baker Iron & Metal Company, Inc.
Crown/Battery Mfg. Co. Inc.
D.H. Griffin Wrecking Company, Inc.
Daniell Battery Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Shredders, Inc.
Southern Foundry Supply, Inc.
Southern Scrap Company, Inc.
Taracorp, Inc.

    EPA will consider public comment on the proposed modification for 
thirty (30) days. EPA may withdraw from the proposed modification 
should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate 
that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
A copy of the Consent Decree is available from Ms. Paula V. Batchelor 
at above mentioned address. Written comments may be submitted to Mrs. 
Kim Dao-Vu at the above address within 30 days of the date of 
publication of this notice.

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
Franklin E. Hill,
Chief, Programs Services Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 98-18991 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Haemophilus influenzae Disease Surveillance Worksheet

(Abbreviated Worksheet Option) Appendix 4 

Name (Last, First) Hospital Record No.

Address (Street and Number) City County Zip Phone

Reporting Physician/Nurse/Hospital/Clinic/Lab Address Phone

0 

2 

 

Local Use Only

CS218553-B 11/2010

Dose 

Dose Given

Month Day Year Vaccine Name / Manufacturer Lot Number

1 /

2 /

3 /

4 /

DETACH HERE and transmit only lower portion if sent to CDC

State (residence of patient) County (residence of patient) Hospitalized (if Yes, date of admission)

Y=Yes

N=No

U=Unknown State ID CDC ID Month Day Year

Date of birth

Month Day Year

Age

999=Unknown

Is Age in days/wks/mos/yrs? If <6 years of age, is patient in daycare?

3=Days

2=Weeks

1=Months

0=Years 

9=Unknown

1=Yes

2=No

9=Unknown

Daycare is defined as a 

supervised group of 2 or 

more unrelated children 

for >4 hours/week

Race

A=Asian/Pacific Islander

B=African American

N=Native American/Alaskan Native

O=Other

W=White

U=Unknown

Sex

M=Male

F=Female

U=Unknown

Ethnic Origin

H=Hispanic

N=Non-Hispanic

U=Unknown

Outcome

1=Survived

2=Died

9=Unknown

Type of infection caused by organism (check all that apply)

1 Primary Bacteremia

2 Meningitis

3 Otitis Media

4 Pneumonia

5 Cellulitis

6 Epiglottitis

7 Peritonitis

8 Pericarditis

9 Septic Abortion

1 Aminonitis

11 Septic Arthritis

1 Conjunctivitis

13 Other

Bacterial species isolated from any normally sterile site

1=Neisseria meningitidis

2=Haemophillus influenzae

3=Group B Streptococcus

4=Listeria monocytogenes

5= Streptococcus pneumoniae

(pneumococcus)

6=Other bacterial species

Specimen from which organism isolated (check all that apply)

1 Blood

2 CSF

3 Pleural fluid

4 Peritoneal fluid

5 Pericardial fluid

6 Joint 

7 Placenta

8 Other normally

sterile site 

Date first positive culture obtained (date specimen drawn)

Month Day Year

IMPORTANT—PLEASE COMPLETE

Did patient receive Haemophilus influenzae b vaccine?

1=Yes

2=No If Yes, please complete the list below

9=Unknown

What was the serotype?

1=Type b

2=Not typable

8=Other

9=Unknown

If H. influenzae was isolated from blood or CSF, was it resistant to

Ampicillin? 1=Yes

2=No

9=Not tested 

or unknown

Chloramphenicol? 1=Yes

2=No

9=Not tested 

or unknown

Rifampin? 1=Yes

2=No

9=Not tested 

or unknown
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00378-CV

Pamela M. Rogers, Appellant

v.

Horis Stedman, M.D., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 20606, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After filing a notice of appeal, appellant Pamela M. Rogers hasfailed to file a clerk’s

record or a reporter’s record. Appellant failed to file the requisite filling fee. Her counsel filed a

motion to withdraw, and the Court allowed him to withdraw. On July 25, 2003, the Clerk of this

Court sent written notice to appellant that if she did not designate, pay for and file a clerk’s record,

or otherwise respond to the Court, by August 5, the cause would be dismissed for want of

prosecution. Appellant has failed to respond.

Consequently, this appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) and (c).

 

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 14, 2003