alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Maine Acadian Culture Preservation 
Commission will meet on Friday, August 21, 1998. The meeting will 
convene at 7:00 P.M. at the Acadian Village in Van Buren, Aroostook 
County, Maine.
    The Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission was appointed by 
the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Maine Acadian Culture 
Preservation Act (PL 101-543). The purpose of the Commission is to 
advise the National Park Service with respect to:
    *The implementation of an interpretive program of Acadian culture 
in the state of Maine.
    *The proceedings of a joint meeting with the Maine Acadian Heritage 
Council.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Review of April 10 and June 12, 1998, summary reports.
    2. Speaker: Barbara LeBlanc of Church Point, Nova Scotia, Canada on 
``Acadian
    Story Telling.''
    3. Report of the National Park Service project staff.
    4. Opportunity for public comment.
    5. Proposed agenda, place, and date of the next Commission Meeting.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Commission meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia 
National Park. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations 
to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be 
made at least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, 
Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, ME 04609-0177; 
telephone (207) 288-5459.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
Len Bobinchock,
Acting Superintendent Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 98-19748 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
No. 11-5786.

#### Joseph Smith, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 951, 132 S. Ct. 418,

181 L. Ed. 2d 273,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7397.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 403 Ill. App. 3d 1104, 373 Ill. Dec. 149, 993 N.E.2d 149.
No. 11-5714.

#### Henry James Koehler, IV, Petitioner v. Disciplinary Counsel of Ohio.

565 U.S. 949, 132 S. Ct. 411,

181 L. Ed. 2d 269,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7450.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1222, 947 N.E.2d 172.
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT April 10, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature IMPROVED COMBAT SHELTER

Shade Number FOLIAGE GREEN 504 Piece/Roll Number ROLL 3739

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard -------------------- 41.36 -1.81 2.41 -------- -------- -------- -------

Tolerance

1

3739-A BLUE LIMIT 1.69 -0.15 -0.22

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
Start by strongly recommending the vaccine at every encounter with parents of

pediatric and adolescent patients.

RECOMMEND

Share your personal vaccine story in your conversation with parents.

SHARE

Assess whether the parent is hesitant or resistant using an open-ended question. 

ASSESS

There are different strategies for talking with hesitant versus resistant parents. 

OR

Focus on empathetic language and

listening to their concerns. Use 

open-ended questions to explore 

motivations and ask before 

sharing information.

Listen to what the parent has to say 

and re-state their concerns without

criticism. Ask before sharing

information and plan to revisit the 

topic at another appointment.

EMPATHIZE WITH 

HESITANT PARENTS

EXPLORE REASONS 

FOR RESISTANCE

HONOR PARENT’S AUTONOMY

https://www.umassmed.edu/prc/

PERSISTENCE IS CRITICAL: DISCUSS VACCINATION AT EVERY VISIT

umwprc@umassmed.edu

CONFIDENCE:

Clinicians For Effective 

COVID-19 Vaccine 

Conversations for Youth 

and Adolescents
126

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

West Virginia

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $27.4 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 4,300

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 47,300

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $1,008 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $109.6 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $63.7 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $173.3 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 16%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$6.7 $8.4 $3.61 $4.53

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$2.6 $3.7 $1.40 $1.99

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $7.4 $11.7 $3.99 $6.31

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$1.7 $2.4 $0.90 $1.28

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.8 $1.2 $0.45 $0.64

TOTAL $19.2 $27.4 $10.35 $14.75

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes And Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1-GRB-8 O1 S.
    Date: July 15-16, 1998.
    Time: July 15, 1998, 8:30 am to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Roberta J. Haber, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 
6AS-37, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8898.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1-GRB-6 (03).
    Date: July 28, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 pm to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Bldg., 45 Center 
Drive, Room 6AS-37, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Neal A. Musto, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6AS-37A, National 
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-7798.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-17615 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 11-5754.

#### Columbus Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 345,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6791.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 347.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133503 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133503 COA: 264366 Livingston CC: 03-013774-FC ANDREW NEIL DOBEK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t0919 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2007

Clerk
WARFIGHTER FIRST 1

Supply Chain Security Strategy

Money Chart

Grand Strategy Strategic Focus Areas

Supply Chain Security Scorecard

DLA’s Supply Chain Security Strategy was designed 

to develop an Enterprise Architecture that ...

(1) Identifies & reports threats, vulnerabilities & prioritizes risk 

(2) Develops offensive solutions to minimize threats

(3) Develops defensive solutions to protect vulnerabilities

(4) Infuses resiliency into sys’s, processes, infrast & people

(5) Prevents disruption thru detection, protection & defense

To develop the Enterprise Architecture, DLA will 

concentrate on four Strategic Focus Areas

(1) Institutionalize Supply Chain Security throughout DLA

(2) Maintain integrity & access to key data

(3) Partner with valid & reputable vendors

(4) Strengthen resiliency of sys’s, processes, infrast & people

Strategic Focus Areas are “strategy bins” that house supply chain 

security-related initiatives that are mapped to objectives in the Agency’s 

Strategic Plan. The initiatives put the strategy in motion by actuating the 

Strategic Focus Areas for the purpose of developing the architecture.

ASOC “Day-to-Day” Detection & Defense of the Global Supply Chain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0051-14

HENRY TAYLOR, JR., Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

GREGG COUNTY

JOHNSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

All sides seem to agree that appellant is monumentally inept at business. The evidence

establishes that he is also monumentally inept at installing signs. The trouble seems to have started

when his father “stepped out” of the business, leaving appellant to both run the business side and the

installation side unsupervised. Appellant has proved himself to be completely unable to perform

either task. But that is not a crime. This is a contract dispute, and it should be left to the civil courts

to resolve it. I respectfully dissent.

Filed: December 10, 2014

Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Timothy M. Mayleben, Chief Financial Officer, of Esperion Therapeutics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:


     (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form on 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *


  /s/ Timothy M. Mayleben
---------------------------
Timothy M. Mayleben,
Chief Financial Officer

Date:    November 14, 2002
# QSL Removals

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-14-00447-CV 

________________________

JOSE LUIS LARA SOSA, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

AMY CHRISTINA LARA, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 64th District Court 

Castro County, Texas 

Trial Court No. A9664-1310; Honorable Robert W. Kinkaid, Jr., Presiding 

 

April 1, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Jose Luis Lara Sosa, proceeding pro se, filed this appeal from the trial 

court’s Final Decree of Divorce from Appellee, Amy Christina Lara, also proceeding pro 

se. The clerk’s record was filed on January 23, 2015. No reporter’s record was filed 

even after an extension of time was granted to the court reporter on the grounds of 

failure to request and designate a record and non-payment. Consequently, the 
2

reporter’s record was deemed filed as of March 6, 2015, and Appellant was notified his

brief was due no later than April 6, 2015. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Pending before this Court is a letter from Appellant in which he communicates 

that he wishes to dismiss this appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, 

Appellant’s request is granted and the appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

Having dismissed the appeal at Appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
No. 11-6120.

#### Steven Lee Bartholomew, Petitioner v. Ronald Van Boening, Superintendent, McNeil Island Corrections Center.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 428,

181 L. Ed. 2d 278,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7148.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 782.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|I, Zhang Lebing, Chief Executive Officer of VIPC
      Communications, Inc., certify that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.                                                                                        
|2.                                                                                        
|3.                                                                                        
|4.                                                                                        
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|5.                                                                                        
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          

October 30, 2003

/s/ Zhang Lebing
  Zhang Lebing, Chief Executive Officer

---
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 15, 2004
No. 11-6367.

#### Marlon Flowers, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 556,

181 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8050.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 83 App. Div. 3d 524, 922 N.Y.S.2d 297.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3144 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3144

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ``Jose Ramos 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSE RAMOS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jose Ramos Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jose Ramos 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3144

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ``Jose Ramos 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
No. 11-6324.

#### Dennis Mouton, III, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583,

181 L. Ed. 2d 429,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8161.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3204 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3204

 To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2019

    Mr. Grijalva (for himself and Mrs. Kirkpatrick) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nogales Wastewater Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, OPERATIONS, AND 
              MAINTENANCE.

    (a) Definition.--In this section:
            (1) Agreement.--The term ``Agreement'' means the memorandum 
        of agreement between the United States Section of the 
        International Boundary and Water Commission and the City of 
        Nogales, Arizona, dated January 20, 2006.
            (2) City.--The term ``City'' means the City of Nogales, 
        Arizona.
            (3) Nogales sanitation project.--The term ``Nogales 
        sanitation project'' means the project owned by the City and 
        the United States Section of the International Boundary and 
        Water Commission and includes--
                    (A) the International Outfall Interceptor (IOI) and 
                the trunkline; and
                    (B) the Nogales International Wastewater Treatment 
                Plant (NIWTP).
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, pursuant 
to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 277d-10 et seq.), and 
notwithstanding the Agreement, an equitable proportion of the costs of 
operation and maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be 
contributed by the City should be based on the average daily volume of 
wastewater originating from the City.
    (c) Capital Costs Excluded.--Pursuant to the Agreement and the Act 
of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 277d-10 et seq.), the City shall have no 
obligation to contribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading 
the Nogales sanitation project.
    (d) Overcharges.--Notwithstanding the Agreement, the United States 
Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission shall not 
charge the City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 
and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion of the 
costs, as described in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```