alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0114

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL PRESSEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 15, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 12 2021

10/12/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0114
bicx_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 1 to EXECUTIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) dated June 30, 2014 is an amendment to that certain Executive Service Agreement ("Executive Agreement") dated February 28, 2013, by and between BioCorRx, Inc., formerly known as Fresh Start Private Management, Inc, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and the undersigned individual, Lourdes Felix (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, on February 28, 2103 the Executive and the Company entered into the Executive Agreement (the “Original Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company have agreed to enter into this Amendment to amend the Original Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive and the Company agree as follows:


 


1. Insertion of Section 5.4. The following section is inserted immediately following Section 5.3 of the Original Agreement:


 



“5.4 Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 5.1, a notice of non-renewal pursuant to Section 6.1, or any other provision in Exhibit A, following the termination of this Agreement and until the fifteenth anniversary of the Termination Date, the Executive shall receive three percent (3%) of the Company’s gross margin of sales of then-current healthcare products, devices and/or modifications thereto thereafter.”


 




2. Affirmation of Remaining Terms and Conditions. The Company and the Executive affirm that all of the other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




  





1











  











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the date first written above.


 





	 	COMPANY:	 
	 	 	 
	 	BIOCORRX, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Neil Muller	 
	 	Name: 	Neil Muller	 
	 	Title:	President	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lourdes Felix	 
	 	Name:	Lourdes Felix	 









 



 


2
No. 10-1466.

#### Ministerial Day Care Association, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Education.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 110,

181 L. Ed. 2d 36,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5330.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.
Exhibit 11 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
                                             Quarters Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
                                               1999         1998          1999          1998
                                             --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>         <C>            <C>
Basic and Diluted Earnings:

Net earnings applicable to common stock      $ 99,222      $48,121      $265,543      $131,819

Shares:

Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding                           545,481            -       545,481             -

Effect of uynallocated Employee
 Stock Ownership Plan shares                  (37,637)           -       (38,183)            -

Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding, as adjusted                     507,844            -       507,298             -

Basic and Diluted earnings per share         $   0.20      $     -      $   0.52      $      -
</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3342 

To make hospitals eligible for health professions opportunity grants under 

section 2008 of the Social Security Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. HORSFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make hospitals eligible for health professions opportunity 

grants under section 2008 of the Social Security Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Providers 

5 Training Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF HOSPITALS FOR HEALTH PROFES7 SIONS OPPORTUNITY GRANTS. 

8 Section 2008(a)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1397g(a)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘or a com10 munity-based organization’’ and inserting ‘‘, a communityVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:42 Jun 22, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3342.IH H3342

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3342 IH

1 based organization, or a hospital (as defined in section 

2 1861(e))’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

5 on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3802 STANDARD 40.56 5.26 19.28

Tolerance

1 3802A GREEN LIMIT 41.57 4.59 18.71 1.01 -0.67 -0.57 0.92

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3802

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 20, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature 100% NYLON TASLAN, 2 PLY, 70D, 

PLAIN WEAVE MIL-PRF-MCWPFS

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

97) IV-C-63 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56 AM Sheet 9 7 of 232 
F*\2_ 

T T - C- C3 

o 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\y^u£>0 WASHINGTON. H.C. 20460 

' w ^ PEB 9 !988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR .<\ND RADIATION 

Honorable Beau Boulter 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Boulter: 

This in response to your January 26, 1988, letter relaying 

the concerns of .Mr. Marty Baker regarding EPA's regulatory 

proposal to require onboard canisters on new vehicles to 

control refueling emissions. To assist you with your response, 

I have enclosed a copy of our proposal for your review. 

Section 3 (pages 31177-31182) explains EPA's overall rationale 

for proposing onboard controls. If you would like further 

details of our analysis, please contact Mr. Philip Carlson of 

the Standards Development and Support Branch of the Emission 

Control Technology Division, 2565 Plymouth ^oad, Ann Arbor, 

MI 48105 (FTS 374-3270 or Commercial (313) -368-4270). 

Thank you for your letter. We will place the letter from 

Mr. Baker in our public docket and fully consider his comments 

in the next phase of our rulemaking process. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket A-87-11
#### Field Election Contest Case.

Argued October 2, 1953.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*277
      *Edward G. Bothwell,*First Assistant County Solicitor, with him *Nathaniel K. Beck,*County Solicitor, for appellant.

*Saul L. Rubin,*for appellee.

November 9, 1953:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This case is so indistinguishable on its facts from *Koch Election Contest Case,*351 Pa. 544, 41 A. 2d 657, that we affirm the decree entered below on the basis of the holding in that case. The one factual difference, which the appellant urges, is that the present petitioner did not aver dereliction of duty on the part of the county return board as a ground for granting him leave to appeal, *nunc pro tunc,*under Section 1407 of the Pennsylvania Election Code (25 PS §3157) from the county return board’s computation and certification. Wrongdoing on the part of the board is not a prerequisite to a right of appeal under Section 1407 which extends to “Any person aggrieved by any order or decision of any county board regarding the computation or canvassing of the returns of any primary or election . . . .”

The mistake in the certification was due to a patent clerical error on the part of precinct election officers of White Oak Borough in the spelling of petitioner’s name on the triplicate or closed return sheet transmitted to the county return board. Without any fault or dereliction on the part of the petitioner, he was un*278informed of tbe mistake until the brief period for appeal from tbe action of tbe county return board, allowed by tbe Election Code, bad expired. However, be acted timely in tbe circumstances and was not guilty of lacbes or otherwise remiss. Tbe undisputed facts presented a clear case for equity’s intervention to restrain or prevent tbe commission or effect of an act contrary to law.

Decree affirmed at tbe appellant’s costs.
No. 11-5943.

#### Lakesha Norington, Petitioner v. Keith Butts, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 501,

181 L. Ed. 2d 354,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7750,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-5349.

#### In re Thresa Lynn Williams, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 396,

181 L. Ed. 2d 249,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6587.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 11-5477.

#### Joseph Everett Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert L. Ayers, Jr., Warden.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 317,

181 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5964.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 642.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 14, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities.




 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
No. 11-6097.

#### David Andrew Byrd, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 928, 132 S. Ct. 365,

181 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7065.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 262.
Date of Posting...................

Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Item #

(K0000) Location Origin

# of 

Units Bulk Wt (lbs) WO3 (%)

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates Offering

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Basic Ordering Agreement... DLA-Stockpile Materials-001-(BOA) - Tungsten Ores & Concentrates

April 4, 2022

April 5, 2022

12:00pm

WO3 

(lbsWO3) W (lbsW ) WO3 (STU) Lot # Type

Total Total Total Total Total

729 Scotia, NY P-3129-B Synthetic Scheelite Unknown 194 68018 73.48 49979.626 39633.844 2499.008

798 Scotia, NY P-3108-A Synthetic Scheelite Unknown 233 64174 69.7 44729.278 35470.317 2236.495

1429 Scotia, NY 2-2352 Wolframite Unknown 31 39400 67.82 26721.08 21189.816 1336.046

1509 Scotia, NY 1 MMSSA Wolframite Spain 40 54911 65.97 36224.787 28726.256 1811.228

1616 Scotia, NY W-102 Wolframite Unknown 173 103342 66.41 68629.422 54423.132 3431.465

1619 Scotia, NY W 112 D Wolframite Unknown 135 80741 69.3 55953.513 44371.136 2797.678

1633 Scotia, NY W-127-A Wolframite Unknown 136 82253 67.91 55858.012 44295.404 2792.876

942 492,839 338,096 268,110 16,905
#### Arthur Kruggel, *Appellant,*v. A. L. Joiner, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 2, 1926.

*Frank Redd*and *Will O. Murrell,*for Appellant;

*Burket & Fish*and *C. G. Hamilton,-*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J.,. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
COVID-19 Pfizer BioNTech EUA Recipient-Caregiver Fact Sheet - 6 

months through 11 years of age

The COVID-19 Pfizer BioNTech EUA Recipient-Caregiver Fact Sheet - 6 months 

through 11 years of age can be found at the following URL. Please take a 

moment to update your bookmark:

https://www.fda.gov/media/167212/download
No. 10-11168.

#### In re Alex Rudaj, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 87,

181 L. Ed. 2d 17,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6746.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
No. 11-6041.

#### Ronald Earl Coleman, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 953, 132 S. Ct. 425,

181 L. Ed. 2d 276,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7366.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*277Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 248.
No. 11A446 (11-6718).

#### Anthony B. Juniper, Petitioner v. Loretta K. Kelly, Warden.

565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,

181 L. Ed. 2d 418,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8078.

November 9, 2011.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Same case below, 281 Va. 277, 707 S.E.2d 290.
Castings and Forgings

Maritime & Land Forging And Casting Team

Our team is in place to support the Maritime and Land Supply chains.

DSCC’s MetaLFACT

Provides casting & forging assistance

MetaLFACT is comprised of Government and Industry representation

MetaLFACT is a resource available to the following

DLA Personnel:  Product Specialists, Buyers, Planners

Engineering Support Activities (ESAs)

Contractors/Suppliers

With active DSCC contracts (w/Contracting Officers’ approval)

Bidding on open DSCC solicitations

Tools to provide assistance

Our team VE, Land, Maritime, and Contractors. TO support a variety of persons and offices with a variety of tools.

Cast Tooling Database

Population

>120 companies

>25,000 tooling records

Utilized by ICP’s

Assist defense contractors in finding tooling

50% success rate of matching inquiries to patterns/suppliers

Company notified each time gov’t buying parts for which they have tooling

$1.5 million in orders directed to participants each month

www.defensetooling.com

1 of the major outcomes of the program is the Casting tooling db. It is in place to enable the Gov to identify the location of tools available. This will enable us to reduce costs by not constantly paying for tooling development on each buy. 

Casting Suppliers Database

Online directory of metalcasters serving the defense industry

Utilized by government and defense contractors

256 Registered Metalcasters

All Processes & Materials

Casting bid solicitations matched to plant capabilities

www.defensecastingsuppliers.com

The defense casting suppliers database is an online resource that is freely available to identify companies that currently or wish to manufacture castings for defense applications. The search engine is currently online and available at the URL shown. A buyer can search for a casting supplier by the following:

Casting process, material, size range of casting produced, secondary operations, small business classifications (8A, Hubzone, etc.), federal supply codes, quality system, low volume capabilities, rapid prototyping capabilities, etc. 

National Forging Tooling Database (NFTD)

Purpose

Rapidly locate forging dies for legacy weapon systems

Benefits

Web base database

Locates forging dies and suppliers

Widely accessible through Haystack Gold

Reduces ALT and PLT

Avoids costs of designing/building new dies

Huge benefit for small order sizes

Sustainable beyond the life of the FAST Program 

Navigating NFTD

Method:  Log into Haystack Gold

Select the Database drop-down menu

Select “Other Databases”, then “Forging/Tooling”

Forging Industry Association Website

http://www.forging.org

  Locate Forge Shops

  Submit Request for Quotes (RFQs)

For Direct DLA submission for Assistance on 

Land or Maritime NSN’s:

dscc.cast.forge@dla.mil

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.jpeg

# image5.jpeg

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.jpeg

# oleObject1.bin

# oleObject2.bin

# image10.png
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 7, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Bodcaw Bancshares, Inc., Stamps, Arkansas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bodcaw 
Bank, Stamps, Arkansas.
    2. Arvest Bank Group, Inc., Bentonville, Arkansas; to merge with 
Ameribank Corporation, Shawnee, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly 
acquire United Oklahoma Bankshares, Inc., Del City, Oklahoma; American 
National Bank & Trust Company of Shawnee, Shawnee, Oklahoma; and United 
Bank, Del City, Oklahoma.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. First National Bank Group, Inc., Edinburg, Texas; to acquire 51 
percent of the voting shares of Nueces National Bank, Corpus Christi, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 9, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18742 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 11-488.

#### Dimitri Henley, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 1062, 132 S. Ct. 784,

181 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8661.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 328 Wis. 2d 544, 787 N.W.2d 350.
### Request for Information Fly Co mmercially LLC (FAA-2015-4688) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Dear Mr. Hobson: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA − 2015 − 4688). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition. z Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed - wing, rotorcraft, lighter - than - air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by December 28, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please f eel free to contac t me at (202) 267–2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Friday , December 11, 2015 7:52 AM To: Michael@flycommercially.inf o
No. 11-6001.

#### John W. Halloran, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 360,

181 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6923.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 429.