alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lottie Pheil, Executrix of the Estate of A. C. Pheil, Deceased, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. E. A. Donovan and W. F. Divine, Co-partners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Donovan & Divine, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 4, 1926.

*James Booth,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*F. J. Mach*and *G. J. Maurer,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-387.

#### Douglas E. Leightey, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 534,

181 L. Ed. 2d 352,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7855.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 836.
SEXUAL ASSAULT

members have 

experienced

unwanted sexual 

contact each year

1:13

SEXUAL ASSAULT IS NOT JUST 

FORCIBLE RAPE. SEXUAL ASSAULT IS 

ANY TYPE OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OR

CONTACT WHERE CONSENT IS NOT 

FREELY GIVEN OR OBTAINED 

AND IS ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH FORCE 

NTIMIDATION, VIOLENCE, COERCION, 

MANIPULATION, THREAT, DECEPTION, 

OR ABUSE OF AUTHORITY.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21
DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY AS OF MARCH 31, 2001


Subsidiary                                           Place of Incorporation
----------                                           ----------------------
DRS Electronic Systems, Inc.                         United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Technical Services, Inc.                         United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Systems Management Corporation                   United States of America
 (Delaware)
Laurel Technologies Partnership                      United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Precision Echo, Inc.                             United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Data Systems, Inc.                               United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Photronics, Inc.                                 United States of America
 (New York)
DRS Optronics, Inc.                                  United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Technologies Canada, Inc.                        United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Technologies Canada Company                      Canada (Nova Scotia)
DRS Hadland Ltd.                                     United Kingdom
DRS Hadland GmbH                                     Federal Republic of Germany
DRS Hadland, Inc.                                    United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Air, Inc.                                        United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Systems, Inc.                                    United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS International, Inc.                              United States of America
 (Delaware)
Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems (DRS) Technologies      Netherlands
 Parsippany B.V.
NAI Technologies, Inc.                               United States of America
 (New York)
DRS Rugged Systems (Europe) Ltd.                     United Kingdom
DRS Rugged Systems (Australia) Pty. Ltd.             Australia
DRS Data Systems (Europe) Ltd.                       United Kingdom
DRS Rugged Systems (Europe) Products Ltd.            United Kingdom
DRS Advanced Programs, Inc.                          United States of America
 (New York)
DRS FPA, Inc.                                        United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Infrared Technologies, LP                        United States of America
 (Delaware)
DRS Sensor Systems, Inc.                             United States of America
 (Delaware)
No. 11-323.

#### Rigoberto Gomez-Gomez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 964, 132 S. Ct. 466,

181 L. Ed. 2d 296,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7530.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 463.
October 16, 2018

What is sexual assault? 

Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the

recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, 

forcible sodomy, fondling or groping, and attempted rape. This is not all inclusive and said actions may not 

meet elements of the local criminal statute. Support and advocacy will be provided for these offenses. 

 Contact the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC) - 24/7

DLA SAPR Hotline 1-800-841-0937 or DSN 392-767-1133

 Encourage your co-worker to seek help and information from the SARC.

 DLA employees are strongly encouraged to report all incidents of sexual assault to

the SARC.

 Take Care of the Victim’s Needs

 Ensure the SARC speaks with the victim (allow privacy to protect confidentiality).

 Do not question the victim.

 Remind the victim not to eat, drink, use the restroom or do anything that may disrupt evidence

collection.

 Please remember the medical well-being and safety of the victim are priority. A victim can get

medical treatment and still maintain their confidential options.

 Remember the following:

 No two people respond to or cope with sexual assault in the same way. How a person presents to

you is not an indication of whether or not a sexual assault has occurred.

 Be aware of your own moral/personal biases and keep them in check. Comments related to victim’s

style of dress, drinking activities or personal choices are irrelevant and may severely impair the

healing process.

 What you say/how you act may make the difference in whether or not the victim proceeds with the

case and may have a significant impact on how the victim continues with recovery. 

Communication Guidelines for Dealing with Victims of Sexual Assault

If you are approached by someone and you believe they may disclose a sexual assault to you, it’s okay to stop 

them and make them aware of the options available to them. For example, you can say the following: 

“Let me stop you for a moment. I want you to know I’m here for you and ready to listen if you need 

help, but I don’t want you to lose any options that may be available to you by disclosing too much 

information to me at this time. If you think you might like to speak with the Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinator before we continue this discussion, I can put you in touch with him/her immediately. 

Just know that if you disclose a sexual assault to me, I may have to report that assault to a supervisor 

or law enforcement.”

SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE

For Supervisors and Key Personnel

(DLA Police/Fire, OIG, legal, CAM/ER/LMR)
No. 11-5359.

#### Tom William Andrews, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 301,

181 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5547.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Order filed January 13, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00903

- CV

____________ LATRICIA SMITH , Appellant

V.

RRE WESTHOLLOW HOLDI NGS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1054024



### O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed November 7, 2014. A partial clerk’s record concerning indigency was filed November 2 1, 2014. The record reflects appellant filed an affidavit to proceed without advance payment of costs on appeal. On November 18 , 2014, the trial court signed an order sustaining a contest to appellant’s claim of indigence. Appellant did not file a motion c hallenging the
trial court’s order. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(2).Accordingly, appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of

$195.00 to the Clerk of this court on or before January 28, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to tim ely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Merchants  Exchange,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  February  28,  2006,  (the
"Report"),  I, Kevin R. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.

Date:  April 12, 2006

                                                    /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                                    --------------------
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-6782.

#### Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. Sam Crow, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, et al.; Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. John Sanders, Judge, District Court of Kansas, Butler County, et al.; Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. J. Thomas Marten, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, et al.; and Ebrahim Adkins, Petitioner v. Robert Sapien, et al.

565 U.S. 1042, 132 S. Ct. 592,

181 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8220.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 748 (first and second judgment); 450 Fed. Appx. 699 (third judgment); and 432 Fed. Appx. 751 (fourth judgment).
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.37 CWT 0.965 $9.0421

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0281 LB 3.5 $7.0984

Class I Price $16.1404

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.52 CWT 0.965 $9.1868

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.8972 LB 3.5 $6.6402

Class I Price $15.8270

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.3134

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0269

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0135

Price change per quart $0.0067

Price change per pint $0.0034

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0024

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0020

Price change per half pint $0.0017

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: June 7, 2015
Unassociated Document


Land Lease Agreement



 


(English Translation)


 


Party A: Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Co.,Ltd.


 


Party B: The People’s Government of Luanzhuang Township, Zhuolu County


 


In consideration of the premises and mutual terms, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. The purpose of this Land Lease Agreement permits Party A use of the land owned by Party B in total of 237 Mu (15.8 hectares).


 


2.  During the lease period, Party A has rights to manage and operate the land.


 


3.  The total compensation of the lease is RMB 4,970,411.75.


 


4. The total land lease fee shall be made in two installments.


 


5. Party B permits Party A to conduct construction on the leased land upon execution of this Land Lease Agreement.


 


6. The lease period is 20 years and Party A shall have the priority to re-lease the land upon the expiration of the current lease period.


 


7. Party A shall have the property rights of all the workshops, office buildings, electricity facilities and production facilities that built by Party A on the leased land, and Party A is eligible to transfer the property rights. Party B shall have the property rights of infrastructures such as concrete road that built by Party A on the leased land.


 


8. Upon the execution of this Land Lease Agreement, Party A shall make the first installment to Party B. Upon receiving the first installment from Party A and by January 20, 2007, Party B shall clear and get the lease land ready for Party A. If Party A cannot use the land due to any reason that caused by Party B within a certain period of time that agreed by both parties, Party B shall pay Party A the penalty at a rate of 2% of total lease price per day.


 


The above terms has been reviewed and in mutual agreement between both parties. The local People’s Court shall be forum to adjudicate any disputes arising under this agreement.


 


Party A: /s/____________________________


 


Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Co., Ltd.


 


Date: 12/27/2006


 


Party B: /s/____________________________


 


The People’s Government of Luanzhuang Township, Zhuolu County


 


Date: 12/27/2006
RAZONES

PARA DEJAR DE FUMAR

Dejar de fumar tiene muchos 

beneficios. Esto es válido 

independientemente de la 

edad que tenga o por cuánto 

tiempo haya fumado.

Rico F., 48 años, 

participante de Consejos®

Todos tienen sus propias razones 

para dejar de fumar.
• Disminuye la probabilidad de cáncer, enfermedad 

cardiaca, accidente cerebrovascular, enfermedad 

pulmonar obstructiva crónica (epoc) y 

otras enfermedades

• Facilita la respiración y reduce la tos

• Usted se ve y se siente más joven 

• Previene las manchas en los dientes y en las uñas

¡Dejar de fumar mejorará su salud y puede 

agregar hasta 10 años a su vida!

Después de dejar 

de fumar, me di 

cuenta de que hay 

otro mundo más 

allá de fumar y es 

un lugar hermoso.

Rebecca M., 57 años, 

participante de Consejos®

DE SALUD Y

APARIENCIA

RAZONES
• Más tiempo para hacer las cosas que le gustan

• Más tiempo y energía para hacer ejercicio

• La comida sabe mejor

• Más dinero para gastar

• Su casa, vehículo y ropa huelen mejor

• Mejor sentido del olfato

Comencé 

a hacer 

ejercicio en 

vez de fumar.

James F., 48 años, 

participante 

de Consejos®

¡Dejar de fumar le ayudará a disfrutar la vida!

DE ESTILO 

DE VIDA

RAZONES
¡Dejar de fumar le ayudará a asegurarse de tener más 

tiempo y energía para estar con sus seres queridos!

• Asegúrese de estar presente para los momentos 

especiales como bodas, graduaciones y nacimientos 

de nietos

• Dé un buen ejemplo a sus hijos

• Mantenga a los niños y a los seres queridos libres 

de los peligros del humo de segunda mano

Quería ser un buen 

modelo a seguir 

para mis hijos, así 

que dejé de fumar.

Beatrice R., 40 años, 

participante de Consejos®

POR LA FAMILIA Y

LOS SERES QUERIDOS

RAZONES
¿Qué MEJORARÍA 

si deja 

de fumar?

¿Cómo el fumar 

afecta a sus 

SERES QUERIDOS?

¿DE QUÉ SE PIERDE 

cuando 

fuma?

¿Qué le 

DISGUSTA 

de fumar?

¿Qué haría con el 

TIEMPO y el 

DINERO extra?

¿Cómo mejorarían su 

SALUD y su APARIENCIA 

si deja de fumar?

Quizás no esté seguro. 

En ese caso, pregúntese:

RAZONES PARA 

DEJAR DE FUMAR?

¿CUÁLES SON SUS 

Tiffany R., 40 años, 

participante de Consejos®
Para obtener información adicional 

sobre dejar de fumar

CDC.gov/dejar

Llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA 

(1-855-335-3569)

Recuerde, aunque ya lo haya intentado, la clave 

del éxito es seguir intentando y no darse por 

vencido. ¡Nunca es tarde para dejar de fumar!

BUSQUE AYUDA 

Noviembre de 2021

PARA DEJAR 

DE FUMAR

Dejar de fumar puede ser difícil y podría requerir 

múltiples intentos. La buena noticia es que hay 

tratamientos con efectividad comprobada 

–medicamentos y asesoramiento– que pueden mejorar 

su probabilidad de dejar de fumar para siempre. 

Muchos de estos tratamientos están disponibles gratis 

o están cubiertos por el seguro.

Cuando esté listo para dejar de fumar, llame a un 

consejero de la línea de ayuda (1-855-DÉJELO-YA)

o consulte con su médico, enfermera u otro 

profesional de la salud sobre los mejores tratamientos 

y recursos para usted.
```

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003

                                                  /s/ Robert E. Manne
                                                    Robert E. Manne
                                                Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).

This certification is being furnished as an exhibit pursuant to SEC Release No.
34-47551.  A signed original of this certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $5.61 CWT 0.965 $5.4137

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.0362 LB 3.5 $10.6267

Class I Price $16.0404

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.05 CWT 0.965 $5.8383

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.1048 LB 3.5 $10.8668

Class I Price $16.7051

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.6647)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0572)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0286)

Price change per quart ($0.0143)

Price change per pint ($0.0071)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0051)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0043)

Price change per half pint ($0.0036)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.06)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.03)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Jan. 3, 2016
Letter extending Management Agreement with Winton Capital Management Limited



 Exhibit 10.7(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Winton Capital Management 

1a. St. Mary Abbot’s Place 
 Kensington,
London W86LS, U.K. 
 Attention: Mr. Martin Hunt 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Hunt: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Feeder LP I 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrew Bastow
		 	Print Name: Andrew Bastow, Director & General Counsel

 JM/sr
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the periodic report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Parker Seto, Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
      hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
      States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.


Date:
                  August 19, 2008
              /s/
                  Parker SetoParker
                  SetoChief
                  Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                  Officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1410 

 

 FINISAR CORPORATION, 

 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC., DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC, 

DIRECTV ENTERPRISES LLC, DIRECTV OPERATIONS LLC, 

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC., and DIRECTV, INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

Charles L. Roberts, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for 

plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were C.J. Veverka, and David R. Todd. 

Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantsappellees. With him on the brief were Jennifer L. Swize; and Victor G. Savikas, Louis L. 

Touton and Kevin G. McBride, of Los Angeles, California. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 

Judge Ron Clark

 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1410 

FINISAR CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC., DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC, 

DIRECTV ENTERPRISES LLC, DIRECTV OPERATIONS LLC, 

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC., and DIRECTV, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 

In CASE NO(S). 1:05-CV-264. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED January 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly__________________________

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk