alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20186]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS PANEL


Task Force on the Future of the Goals; Meeting

AGENCY: National Education Goals Panel.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date and location of a forthcoming 
meeting of the Task Force on the Future of the Goals. This notice also 
describes the functions of the National Education Goals Panel and the 
Task Force on the Future of the Goals.

DATE AND TIME: Saturday, August 1, 1998 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Milwaukee Hilton Hotel, 509 West Wisconsin Avenue, (Walker 
Room), Milwaukee, WI 53203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Nelson, Executive Director, 1255 
22nd Street, NW, Suite 502, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone: (202) 724-
0015.

SUMMARY: The National Education Goals Panel (NEGP) was established to 
monitor, measure and report state and national progress toward 
achieving the eight National Education Goals, and report to the states 
and the Nation on that progress. The authorizing legislation for the 
National Education Goals and the Goals Panel are expected to expire in 
1999. At its February, 1998, meeting, the Panel decided to form a Task 
Force to make recommendations on the future of the Goals after the year 
2000.

AGENDA ITEMS: The meeting of the Task Force on the Future of the Goals 
is open to the public. Agenda items will include: (1) A review of the 
charge to the Task Force; (2) Presentations by Governor Roy Romer, (D), 
Colorado and Chester E. Finn, of the Hudson Institute, on the History 
of why the Goals were established, expectation for the Goals and the 
Panel and Recommendations, possibilities for the future; (3) Staff 
Responses to Panel Requests; (4) a Panel discussion on the future of 
the Goals and next steps for the Panel; and (5) the Panel will receive 
a commissioned paper on Grading State Standards.

    Dated: July 23, 1998.
Ken Nelson,
Executive Director, National Education Goals Panel.
[FR Doc. 98-20186 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4010-01-M
Exhibit 32.3




                Written Statement of the Chief Operating Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
President and Chief Operating Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mary Lou Fiala
------------------
Mary Lou Fiala
August 14, 2003
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 4, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00698-CR

IN RE FREDDRICK SMITH, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 889,765-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 25, 2014, relator Freddrick Smith filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the 

Honorable Mark Kent Ellis, presiding judge of the 351st District Court of Harris 

County, to take action on his pending post-conviction application for writ of

habeas corpus.
2

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction in final 

post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 

(West Supp. 2014); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 

115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). An intermediate appellate 

court has no authority to compel a trial court to rule on matters related to a petition 

for writ of habeas corpus. See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (“Should an applicant find it necessary 

to complain about an action or inaction of the convicting court, the applicant may 

seek mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals.”). Therefore, we have 

no jurisdiction over relator’s request for relief.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of 

jurisdiction.

 PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3920 STANDARD 41.41 5.22 18.51

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3920

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 20, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature GLOVE INSERTS, COLD WEATHER A-A-55119

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and in connection with the quarterly report on
Form  10-QSB of State of  Franklin  Bancshares,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the
quarter  ended  June  30,  2003,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Randal R. Greene,
President of the Company,  hereby  certifies  that (1) the Report fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     This Certification is signed on August 12, 2003.


                                            /s/ Randal R. Greene
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Randal R. Greene, President
No. 11-268.

#### Mitch Hayden, Petitioner v. Pontiac Police Officer Dwight Green.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 543,

181 L. Ed. 2d 349,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7867.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 150.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 24, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 24, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0222. WILLIAM NEWMAN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

22T3956
(1) Adjusting Price $24.68 CWT

(2) Base Price $26.19 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (1.51)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.13)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.06)

Price change per quart ($0.03) 

Price change per pint ($0.02)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price change per half pint ($0.01)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.13)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.06)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.03)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.02)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Dec 4th, 2022
No. 10-10599.

#### Rashad McKay, aka Rashod McKay, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 942, 132 S. Ct. 398,

181 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7304.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
J. 

J. 

957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). We conclude that the district 

court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge 

Fry & Berning, LLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

011111111111111111111 gEWSEPIRMiat-aik;",91.W= '
#### J. F. Haithcox, Orlando Mortgage & Loan Company, a Corporation, and J. F. Ange, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v Citizens Bank of Lake Wales, a Banking Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

*E. W. & JR. O. Davis*and *H. M. Jarvis,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Maguire & Voorhis,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curtam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen vand inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.
JAMES D. NICOLO

Is being inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame for his continuous 

outstanding mission support. His innovative solutions to complex engineering issues involving 

replenishment parts have resulted in substantial cost savings. Mr. Nicolo’s standardization and 

productivity improvements for military fastener specifications involved over 250,000 different 

parts used in military equipment. His achievements in specification reform significantly improved 

product quality and delivery times. He developed an economic and time-efficient means for 

accomplishing product test and evaluation. This is only one of the many engineering successes that 

typify and distinguish Mr. Nicolo’s exemplary career. He has consistently earned the praise and 

respect of his superiors and colleagues in industry and government. His accomplishments continue 

to serve the Agency and the entire logistics support community. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/nicolo.htm 1/21/2016
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 4 (a)




March 8, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:  TXU Gas Company
     2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

       Pursuant to the exemption afforded by Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of
Regulation S-K, TXU Gas Company (Company) is not filing as exhibits to its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2001 instruments with respect to its long-term
debt of the Company and/or its subsidiaries. These instruments include
agreements with respect to senior notes. Each item of long-term debt referenced
above does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Reference is made to Note 4 to
Consolidated Financial Statements (included in Appendix A of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2001).

       The Company agrees to furnish a copy of the above instruments to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

                                          Sincerely,




                            /s/           Biggs C. Porter
                           ---------------------------------------------------
                                          Biggs C. Porter
                               Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
No. 11-6592.

#### Richard Mason King, Jr., Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1066, 132 S. Ct. 798,

181 L. Ed. 2d 497,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8567,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGENCY
CENTERS, L.P. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 3/31/00
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0001066247
<NAME>                                        REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                24,171,177
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         29,037,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,974,003
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                             2,537,676,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                        93,356,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,534,258,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                         1,489,248,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2,534,258,081
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      76,807,689
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         17,439,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      12,782,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    14,727,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       27,947,939
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   27,947,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          21,635,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.38



</TABLE>
No. 10-7432.

#### Robert E. Gallegos, Sr., Petitioner v. D. K. Sisto, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1195, 131 S. Ct. 1005,

178 L. Ed. 2d 856,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 644.

January 18, 2011.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 650.
Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*























































































































































































Redaction Code 13 *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*





























_____________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 215 through 217 are not included in this 

copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X___ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request.
Mi tesoro... 

Prometo protegerte contra 


14 enfermedades graves.
 

Siga las recomendaciones del 

calendario de vacunación para 

proteger a su bebé contra 

14 enfermedades prevenibles con 

vacunas antes de que cumpla los 2 años. 

Con salud, todo es posible. 

Vacune a sus hijos. 1-800-232-4636

http://www.cdc.gov/espanol/vacunas

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/events/niiw/promotional/print-materials/downloads/p-infant-sp.pdf perenne

CS225447-D
No. 11-156.

#### William R. Rhodes, et al., Petitioners v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

565 U.S. 977, 132 S. Ct. 499,

181 L. Ed. 2d 347,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7899.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 88.
exh10-35.htm










Exhibit 10.35


Loan Agreement


Party A: Zhucheng Ziyang Ceramic Co., Ltd.


Party B: Zhucheng Dazhong Hospital








	
  

	
1.

	
Type: Short term loan








	
  

	
2.

	
Loan  Amount: RMB 20,000,000








	
  

	
3.

	
Loan period: 1 year. From October 29, 2010 to October 28, 2011.








	
  

	
4.

	
Usage: Normal operations.








	
  

	
5.

	
Interest rate:  1% monthly. Collect interest once every six month.








	
  

	
6.

	
Guarantee items: Pledged by property, plant and equipment








	
  

	
7.

	
If Party B can’t pay back at the due date, the interest will be doubled until appeal lawsuit.’












Party A: Zhucheng Ziyang Ceramic Co., Ltd.


Legal Represntative Signature: /s/ Lingbo Chi


Party B: Zhucheng Dazhong Hospital


Legal Represntative Signature: /s/ Peikai Zhao


Oct.29, 2010






  





  











  













Loan Agreement


Party A: Zhucheng Ziyang Ceramic Co., Ltd.


Party B: Zhucheng Dazhong Hospital








	
  

	
8.

	
Type: Short term loan








	
  

	
9.

	
Loan  Amount: RMB 20,000,000








	
  

	
10.

	
Loan period: 1 year. From October 31, 2011 to November 30, 2012.








	
  

	
11.

	
Usage: Normal operations.








	
  

	
12.

	
Interest rate:  1% monthly. Collect interest once every six month.








	
  

	
13.

	
Guarantee items: Pledged by property, plant and equipment








	
  

	
14.

	
If Party B can’t pay back at the due date, the interest will be doubled until appeal lawsuit.












Party A: Zhucheng Ziyang Ceramic Co., Ltd.


Legal Represntative Signature: /s/ Lingbo Chi


Party B: Zhucheng Dazhong Hospital


Legal Represntative Signature: /s/ Peikai Zhao


Oct.31, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19864]



[[Page 39907]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01873 and NAFTA-01873A]


Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated, Webster, MA and New York, 
NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter 2, Title II, of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification of Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on October 19, 1997, applicable to all workers of 
Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated, Webster, Massachusetts. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on November 7, 1997 (62 FR 
60280).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred at the New York, New York location of Anglo 
Fabrics Company when it closed in May, 1998. The New York, New York 
location was headquarter offices, sales and designing to support the 
production of wool fabrics at the Webster, Massachusetts facility of 
Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
workers at Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated, New York, New York.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated adversely affected by 
imports from Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01873 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Anglo Fabrics Company, Incorporated, Webster, 
Massachusetts (NAFTA-01873) and New York, New York (NAFTA-01873A) 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after July 30, 1996 through October 19, 1999 are eligible to apply 
for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10 day of July 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-19864 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### T. J. Noone, Orlando Mortgage & Loan Co., a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, and J. F. Ange, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Citizens Bank of Lake Wales, a Banking Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 25, 1926.

*E. W. & B. G. Davis*and *PL. M. Jarvis,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Maguire & Voorhis,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.-

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of- the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-6190.

#### Ryan Hammontree, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 552,

181 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8043.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 54 So. 3d 492.
No. 11-5451.

#### Derek N. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Staples, Inc.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 606,

181 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8083.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 313, 181 L. Ed. 2d 193, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5765.