alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACIP Dengue Vaccine 

Workgroup

Wilbur Chen, MD, MSc

ACIP Member and Workgroup Chair

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

ACIP Meeting February 23, 2023
 DENV-1, 2, 3, 4

• Lifelong DENV type-specific 

immunity

• Short-term cross-immunity (~1–2 

years)

• A second dengue infection is the 

most important risk factor for severe dengue

 Dengue is the most common 

mosquito-borne virus globally

Dengue Virus
DengvaxiaTM

and previous dengue infection

Clinical trials found different outcomDengvaxiaTM vaccination among chilwithout previous dengue infection.

• Children without previous dengue in

higher risk hospitalization and sever

were vaccinated and then had a DEN

• Children with previous dengue infec

protected from hospitalization and sthey were vaccinated with Dengvaxia
DengvaxiaTM ACIP Recommendation June 202

Three doses of Dengvaxia for the prevention of dengcaused by dengue virus se3, and 4 in people 9–16 ye• laboratory confirmation 

dengue virus infection

AND

• living in endemic areas.
Work group timeline 2023 for TAK003

Presentations to ACIP

Feb March April May June July Aug Sept 

Vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and 

safety data and WG Interpretation

GRADE analysis and costeffectiveness analysis

Et
Summary of work group plans and act

• Review of efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety data (GRAD• Review of EtR domains and cost-effectiveness analysi

s

• Presentation of policy options and ACIP vote
Presentations today

TAK-003 Efficacy, Safety and ImmunogenicDr. Shibadas Biswal, TakedaWork Group Summary and Interpretation 003 Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity Dr. Gabriela Paz-Bailey, CDC, NCEZID, DVBD
ACIP Dengue Vaccines Workgroup

ACIP MembersWilbur Chen (Chair)Kathy PoehlingBeth BellVeronica McNallyCDC Co-LeadGabriela Paz-BaileyLaura AdamsEx Officio MembersKaitlyn Morabito (NIH)Ralph LeBlanc (FDA)Ihid Carneiro Leao (FDA)Kirk Prutzman (FDA)Srihari Seshadri (DOD)

Liaison Representatives

Elizabeth Barnett (AAP)Rob Schechter (AIM)ConsultantsEdwin AsturiasRobert AtmarAlan BarrettIris CardonaAnna DurbinTony MarfinKristen PierceAnita Shet

CDC ContributorsJosh WongMimi EckertRachel EidexAlfonso HernandeSusan HillsTerri HydeMike McNeilJorge MunozErin StaplesCindy WeinbaumRita Helfand
fiUil4)itie*^^^ 

1 AVIATION WAY. DEKALB-PEACHTREE AIRPORT. ATLANTA, GEORGIA, 30341 

PHONE: 770.458.9851 FAX: 770.458.1883 

o> 

o> 

7/7/2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th Street SW, Room PL-400 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

To whom it may concern: ^ ' " 

I am writing to submit petition for exemption renewal to CFR 14, 135.143(c)(2)/Docket No. 

16097,43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978; as amended by Amdt. 135-22, 52 FR 3392, Feb. 3, 1987. Our 

previous exemption, number 6037E, has expired and we failed to receive an expiration notice from the 

-FAA. OuFftir earner c^ificate-Bumbcr is CSMA688B: " 

This part reads as follows: 

§ 135.143 General requirements. 

(c) ATC transponder equipment installed within tine time periods indicated below must meet the perfomiance and 

environmental requirements of the following TSO's: 

(1) Through January 1, 1992: (i) Any class of TSO-C74b or any class of TSO-C74c as appropriate, provided that the 

equipment was manufactured before January 1,1990; or 

(ii) The appropriate class of TS0-C112 (Mode S). 

(2) After January 1, 1992: The appropriate class of TS0-C112 (Mode S). For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this 

section, "installation" does not include— 

(i) Temporary installation of TSO-C74b or TSO-C74c substitute equipment, as appropriate, during maintenance of the 

pennanent equipment; 

(ii) Reinstallation of equipment after temporary removal for maintenance; or 

(iii) For fleet operations, installation of equipment in a fleet aircraft after removal of the equipment for maintenance 

from another aircraft in the same operator's fleet. 

Although our current fleet is equipped with Mode S transponders we would like the option of putting 

aircraft on our certificate without Mode S transponders. We fee! operations can be conducted safely 

without Mpde_S as has b-fifin prtwenJiv the_past. Jlie cost burdea to4ipgFade-to Mode-S £or us orfoture 

customers should not be a requirement. 

Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Gregg Johnson 

Chief Pilot 

Epps Air Service, Inc.
No. 10-10792.

#### Joaquin Lassalle-Velazquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 172,

181 L. Ed. 2d 84,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6224.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Consent
of Independent Registered Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements listed
below of 1st Source Corporation of our reports dated February 22, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of 1st Source Corporation and
subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of 1st Source Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form-10K) for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
 
 
 Registration
Statement No. 333-101712 on Form S-8 dated December 6, 2002
 Registration
Statement No. 333-101711 on Form S-8 dated December 6, 2002
 Registration
Statement No. 333-101710 on Form S-8 dated December 6, 2002
 Registration
Statement No. 333-101709 on Form S-8 dated December 6, 2002
 Registration
Statement No. 333-64314 on Form S-8 dated July 2, 2001
 Registration
Statement No. 333-64306 on Form S-8 dated July 2, 2001
 Registration
Statement No. 333-64304 on Form S-8 dated July 2, 2001
 Registration
Statement No. 333-26243 dated April 30, 1997
 Registration
Statement No. 33-81852 dated July 22, 1994
 Registration
Statement No. 33-8840 dated September 16, 1986
 
 
 
 
 /s/      
Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
 
 Chicago,
Illinois
 February
22, 2008
As revised February 6, 2004
 EMS Technologies, Inc.
Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
 Responsibilities
 All Company employees, officers and directors (collectively, Personnel) are responsible for:
 
    
    Always conducting the Companys business honestly, according to the highest
professional and ethical standards, respecting the safety of themselves and others, and
with due regard for the environment. Company Personnel will endeavor to comply with all
applicable national, state, provincial and local laws and regulations.
    
    Ensuring full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable financial, and other public
reporting.
    
    Doing everything reasonably and legally within their power to meet or exceed the
Companys contractual obligations to its customers, suppliers and other business partners.
    
    Avoiding situations that create an actual or perceived conflict of interest with their
responsibilities to the Company. As a result, for example, all Personnel are prohibited
from making personally significant investments in, or being employed in any capacity by,
customers or suppliers with which they deal on behalf of the Company (except to the extent
approved by senior management or the Board of Directors after full disclosure of the
interest). Similarly, all personnel are also prohibited from making personally
significant investments in, or being employed in any capacity by, competitors of the
Company.
    
    Not accepting from or offering to any customer, subcontractor or supplier any form of
gratuity. However, if conducive to the efficient conduct of business, Company Personnel
may offer and accept refreshments, working lunches, reasonable business-related
entertainment, and token business related items, as long as they are not prohibited by
applicable law or the other companys policies. In the case of U.S. government employees
(including military personnel), this means that we may provide only:
  occasion not item
 
    
    Protecting all classified, proprietary, and competition-sensitive information entrusted
to them, whether it belongs to the government, the Company, or a customer, subcontractor
or other supplier, in accordance with prescribed procedures.
    
    Respecting property belonging to others, including competitors. This applies to
physical property and also to intangible property, such as patents, copyrights, trade
secrets and other proprietary business information.




---



##### 




    
    Ensuring correct and accurate labor charging.
    
    Not using the Company name to endorse political, social or religious causes, or
products other than Company products, except as authorized by senior management.
    
    Immediately reporting actual or suspected violations of this Code to a supervisor, a
senior Human Resources representative, the Chief Financial Officer, a member of the
Companys legal staff, or through the Companys Ethical and Legal Concerns Hotline.
    
    When in doubt about the ethics or legality of proposed action, first discussing the
matter with the responsible supervisor or other person identified under the preceding
bullet.
 Accountability and Enforcement
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ ___ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A15A0379. SOX v. THE STAT E. This appeal was do cketed in this Cou rt on Octob er 8, 2014. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed wit hin 20 da ys of docketin g. Court of Ap peals Rule 23. O n Decem ber 3, 2014 , Appell ant was or dered to f ile a brie f in this ca se within ten (10) days or subject the appeal to dism

issal. As of the date of this order, Appellan t has fail ed to file a brief, and no motion for exten sion for good

cause hasbeen file d. Consequentl

y, Appel lee’s Motion t o Dismiss this appeal is h ereby GRANTED. Court of A

ppeals Rule s 7, 23. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, At

lanta,_____

_______________ I certify t hat the abo ve is a true

extrac t from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd t he s eal of sai

d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 12/19/2014 December 19, 2014
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 22014 STANDARD 34.38 -0.17 -0.68

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT February 11, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature LEATHER, SHEEPSKIN MIL-DTL-32067

Shade Number BLACK 3236 Piece/Roll Number 22014
No. 11-6212.

#### Jerron Johns, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 956, 132 S. Ct. 434,

181 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7197.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 628.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000


<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,934
<SECURITIES>                                     2,993
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,850
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,325
<PP&E>                                          16,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,134)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,210
<SALES>                                         47,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,289
<CGS>                                           13,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (38,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (21)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (38,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.38)



</TABLE>
Item # Description of Proposed Item

Make/

Model 

Number of 

Proposed 

item

1 Heavy Duty Cutter-head for Mini Excavators and Track Hoes 300 BX

2 Cutter-head for small tractors with Boom Arm and small Excavators/Track Hoes BOOM MOUNTED

3 Cutter-head for small Excavators/Track Hoes 400HL-BMT4 Convertible Cutter-head for Skid Steer, Compact Loaders and small Track Hoes 400HL

5 Cutter-head for Medium Mid Frame Excavators 

(30,000 - 50,000 lbs) 400HDM

6 Cutter-head for High Flow Skid Steer and Compact Track Loaders 500HF

7 Convertible Cutter-head for Heavy Duty Excavators, Skid Steers and Compact Loaders 500HF-HDM

8

Convertible Cutter-head for Heavy Duty 

Excavators, Skid Steers and Compact Loaders with 

optional 2nd motor for additional power

500HF-HDM 

(2nd Motor)

9 Replacement Cutter-head for GT-18, GT-18XP, GT- 25, GT-25XP, GT-35, and GT-35XP 700HF

10 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 200 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Captive Track Undercarriage GT-16XP (Captive Track)

11 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 200 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Steel Track Undercarriage GT-16XP (Steel Track)

12 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 200 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Captive Track Undercarriage GT-25 (Captive Track)

13 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 200 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Steel Track Undercarriage GT-25 (Steel Track)14 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 250 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Captive Track Undercarriage GT-25XP (Captive Track)15 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 250 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Steel Track Undercarriage GT-25XP (Steel Track)

16 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 310 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Captive Track Undercarriage GT-35 (Captive Track)

17 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 310 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Steel Track Undercarriage GT-35 (Steel Track)18 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 365 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Captive Track Undercarriage GT-35XP (Captive Track)19 Mulcher/Brushcutter with 365 HP Stage V Cummins Diesel Engine, Steel Track Undercarriage GT-35XP (Steel Track)

Gyro-Trac Corporation (SPE8EC-22-D-0001) - A

gricultural Equipment
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6374** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JAMES LOUIS JONES , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern D istrict of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00249

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. James Louis Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Erik R. Barnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Louis Jones appeals the district court ’ s order denying Jones’ motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones , No. 1:04

- cr - 00249

- LMB

- 1 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 19 2010; entered Feb. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b efore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 143 / Monday, July 27, 1998 /Rules and Regulations 40067

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 971208294–8154–02; I.D.

103097B]

RIN 0648–AJ20

Fisheries off West Coast States and in

the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast

Groundfish Fishery; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

SUMMARY: This document contains

corrections to the final regulations (I.D.

103097B), which were published in the

Federal Register of Thursday, June 25,

1998, (63 FR 34606). The regulations

implemented management measures

that restrict the frequency of limited

entry permit transfers to once every 12

months, with transfers taking effect on

the first day of a cumulative landings

limit period. This rule also required the

sorting of groundfish species with trip

limits, size limits, quotas, or harvest

guidelines at the point of landing, and

the retention of landings receipts on

board the vessel that has made those

landings.

DATES: Effective July 27, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Yvonne de Reynier, NMFS, 206–526–

6120.

Correction

In final rule document 98-16789

beginning on page 34606,in the issue of

Thursday, June 25, 1998, make the

following corrections:

§ 660.302 [Corrected]

1. On page 34608, in the second

column, in § 660.302, in the definition,

in the second and third lines, ‘‘Fisheries

Management Division,’’ should read

‘‘Sustainable Fisheries Division,’’.

§ 660.333 [Corrected]

2. On page 34608, in the second and

third columns, in§ 660.333, paragraph

(c)(1), the first sentence should read,

‘‘When the SFD transfers the limited

entry permit on behalf of the permit

holder, the SFD will reissue the permit

in the name of the new permit holder

with such gear and, if applicable,

species endorsements and tier

assignments as are eligible for transfer

with the permit.’’

§ 660.333 [Corrected]

3. On page 34608, in the third

column, in § 660.333, paragraph (d)

introductory text, the second sentence is

corrected to read as follows: ‘‘The owner

of a permit endorsed for longline or trap

(or pot) gear applying for a sablefish

endorsement or a tier assignment under

§ 660.336(c) or (d) has the burden to

submit evidence to prove that

qualification requirements are met.’’

Dated: July 22, 1998.

Rolland A. Schmitten,

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,

National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 98–20011 Filed 7–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F
No. 11-6086.

#### Burlin C. Webb, Petitioner v. Patricia S. Oney, Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Butler County, et al.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 510,

181 L. Ed. 2d 359,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7884.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.8

2009 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This 2009 Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment"), entered into the fourth
day of February, 2009, effective as of January 1, 2009, is by and between Dynamic Materials Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and John G. Banker, a resident of the State of Colorado ("Executive"). This Amendment amends the Employment Agreement dated April 23, 2008 to be
effective as of January 1, 2008, between the Company and Executive (the "Agreement").

In
consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.Term.    Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing "2008" with
"2009" in both occurrences.

2.Salary.    Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing
"$275,000" with "$284,625."

3.Non-discretionary Annual Bonus.    Section 4(b) of the Agreement is
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:



4.Miscellaneous.    All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain effective.

In
witness whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.

DYNAMIC MATERIALS CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ YVON CARIOU Yvon Cariou President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: February 4, 2009

EXECUTIVE/s/ JOHN G. BANKER John G. Banker


---



QuickLinks
No. 11-169.

#### Tennessee ex rel. Arlie Watson, et al., Petitioners v. Larry Waters, et al.

565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 576,

181 L. Ed. 2d 421,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8187.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39889-39890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


General Management Plan, Lassen Volcanic National Park, 
California; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement

    Summary: The National Park Service will prepare a General 
Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) for Lassen 
Volcanic National Park, California and initiate the scoping process for 
this document. This notice is in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 and 40 
CFR 1508.22, of the regulations of the President's Council on 
Environmental Quality for the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, Public Law 91-190.
    Background: The purpose of the GMP/EIS will be to state the 
management philosophy for the park and provide strategies for 
addressing major issues facing the area. Two types

[[Page 39890]]

of strategies will be presented in the GMP: (1) those required to 
manage and preserve cultural and natural resources; and (2) those 
required to provide for safe, accessible and appropriate use of those 
resources by visitors. Based on these strategies, the GMP will identify 
the programs, actions and support facilities needed for their 
implementation.
    Persons wishing to comment or express concerns on the management 
issues and future management direction of Lassen Volcanic National Park 
should address these to the Superintendent, Lassen Volcanic National 
Park, P.O. Box 100, Mineral, CA 96063-0100. Questions regarding the 
plan should be addressed to the superintendent either by mail to the 
above address, or by telephone at (530) 595-4444. Comments on the 
scoping of the proposed GMP/EIS should be received no later than 
September 30, 1998.
    Public scoping meetings to receive comments and suggestions on the 
plan will be held in August in communities in the vicinity of the park. 
The time and location of these meetings will be announced in the local 
and regional media.
    The responsible official is John J. Reynolds, Regional Director, 
Pacific West Region, National Park Service. The draft GMP/EIS is 
expected to be available for public review in late summer or fall, 
1999, and the final GMP/EIS and Record of Decision completed early in 
2000.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
Patricia L Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region
[FR Doc. 98-19747 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P