alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 21 48

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e
v. Je ss e E. Mo rg an ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe llan t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Jan ua ry

11 , 20 16 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

14 , 20 16 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Je ss e Mo rg an ap pe al s f

r o m th e se nt en ce th e Dis tri ct Co urt im po se d aft er he 1 pl ead ed gu il ty to wire frau d. His co un se l ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , The Hon or ab le Greg Kay s, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i.38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , reque st in g le av e to wit hd raw an d arg ui ng th at th e Dis tri ct Co urt

in ad equa te ly con si de reda rel ev an t fa ct orat s en te nc in g.
M o r g a n’s writ te n pl ea ag reem en t co nt ai ne d an ap pe al waiv er. Upo n care f u l r ev ie w, we en fo rce th e waiv er. See Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 8 8 9

– 9 2 (8 th Ci r.) (en ba nc ) (d is cu ss in g e n f o r cem en t of ap pe al waiv ers ), cert
. de ni ed , 54 0 U.S. 99 7 (2 00 3) . W e h av e in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wedth e reco rd , s ee Pe ns on v. Oh io , 48 8 U.S. 75 , 80 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su e fo r ap pe al ou ts id e th e sc op e of th e ap pe al waiv er. Acco rd in gl y , we di sm is s t hi s ap pe al an d g ran t co un se l le av e to wit hd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
No. 11-5651.

#### Marco Marroquin, Petitioner v. Ben Curry, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 337,

181 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6218.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 402A/19 o

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 402A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6519 octombrie 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 402A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6519 octombrie 2022

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Anunţuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | Oficiul European pentru Selecţia Personalului (EPSO) |
| 2022/C 402 A/01 | Anunț de modificare a addendumului la anunțul de concursuri generale – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba daneză (DA) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba greacă (EL) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba franceză (FR) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba croată (HR) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba polonă (PL) ( JO C 444 A, 22.12.2020 ) | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Oficiul European pentru Selecţia Personalului (EPSO)

2022/C 402 A/01

Anunț de modificare a addendumului la anunțul de concursuri generale – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba daneză (DA) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba greacă (EL) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba franceză (FR) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba croată (HR) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba polonă (PL) ( JO C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

( JO C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Oficiul European pentru Selecţia Personalului (EPSO)

| 19.10.2022 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2022

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 402/1

---

Anunț de modificare a addendumului la anunțul de concursuri generale – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba daneză (DA) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba greacă (EL) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba franceză (FR) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba croată (HR) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba polonă (PL) (1)

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 444 A din 22 decembrie 2020
  )

(2022/C 402 A/01)

La pagina 7, după ultimul paragraf de la punctul 6, se adaugă următorul punct:

| „7. | Prin derogare de la punctul 6, pentru concursurile EPSO/AD/376/20, EPSO/AD/377/20 și EPSO/AD/379/20, procedura pentru SCBI constă într-o reuniune online cu doi membri ai comisiei de evaluare care vor intervieva, vor observa și vor evalua performanța fiecărui candidat și vor acorda un punctaj pentru fiecare competență care face obiectul testului. Nu va fi prezent niciun intervievator în afară de membrii comisiei de evaluare. Celelalte dispoziții ale punctului 6 rămân aplicabile.” |
| --- | --- |

„7.

---

(1)  JO C 72 A, 5.3.2020.

1

---
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A.D.C. and * From the 3 18 th District Court

E.N.C., children, of Midland County

Trial Court No. FM 50087

No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 1 90

- C V * March 29, 2019

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C. J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, th e order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jerry Clark, Jr.
No. 11-6516.

#### Jorge Valdes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 990, 132 S. Ct. 529,

181 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7619.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 873.
Fw: "Rice 101" Presentation and Tour Request

Allison Wiedeman 

to: 

Jack Faulk, Jordan Page 

03/10/2010 11:13 AM 

Show Details 

Jordan - plse set up a brown bag to watch this video - invite the headquarters wg. Thanks 

----------------- 

Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services 

 From: Roberta Firoved [rfiroved@calrice.org] 

 Sent: 03/09/2010 08:41 AM PST 

 To: Linda Boornazian; Allison Wiedeman 

 Cc: Tim Johnson <tjohnson@calrice.org> 

 Subject: "Rice 101" Presentation and Tour Request 

Linda and Allison ‐ 

Thank you for meeting with the rice industry to discuss the NPDES permit process on February 24. Per your

request, I attached a presentation we call “Rice 101”. It was originally designed for the OPP staff during a year of

budget cuts and travel restrictions. The EPA staff could not visit rice country for a tour, so we brought the tour to

EPA.  

We are currently in the process of updating photos and adding animation to the presentation. Regardless, the

current presentation provides some sense of timing and management practices. The best way to see and

understand water management is first hand.

The California Rice Commission invites staff from the EPA/OW to visit CA for one of our rice tours. Water is

essential to our crop (and all CA agriculture), so also a focal point of our tours. The tour usually lasts one week

with travel on Monday and Friday. However, we can always tailor the tour to accommodate your schedules.

Please let me know if there is an interest and we can work out the details. The cropping season is mid‐April

through October, and the optimal time to visit is May through July.

Thanks again,

Roberta Firoved

Industry Affairs Manager

California Rice Commission

8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172

Sacramento, CA 95826

916/387‐2264 PHONE

916/387‐2265 FAX  

rfiroved@calrice.org

"Rice 101" Presentation and Tour Request Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6188.htm 5/11/2010
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, August 24, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19532 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 11-6650.

#### Martin Valadez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 538,

181 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7638.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3274 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3274

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the energy 
            investment tax credit for electrochromic glass.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2019

 Mr. Horsford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the energy 
            investment tax credit for electrochromic glass.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dynamic Glass Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF ELECTROCHROMIC GLASS AS ENERGY PROPERTY FOR 
              PURPOSES OF INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 48(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subclause 
(III) and by adding at the end the following new subclause:
                                    ``(V) energy property described in 
                                paragraph (3)(A)(viii), and''.
    (b) Electrochromic Glass Described.--Section 48(a)(3)(A) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (vi), by adding 
``or'' at the end of clause (vii), and by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
                            ``(viii) glass which uses electricity to 
                        change its light transmittance properties in 
                        order to heat or cool a structure, but only 
                        with respect to property the construction of 
                        which begins before January 1, 2022.''.
    (c) Phaseout.--Section 48(a)(6) of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``paragraph (3)(A)(i)'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``clause (i) or (viii) of paragraph 
        (3)(A)'', and
            (2) by inserting ``and electrochromic glass'' after ``solar 
        energy property''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
3:
4:



RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS













We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26659) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Reliability Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.











|                             | BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|---------------------------- | ----------------------
|                             |                       
|                             |                       
|                             |                       
|Houston, Texas
March 8, 2002 |                       



33
No. 11-390.

#### Donald C. Marro, Petitioner v. Fauquier County Board of Supervisors.

565 U.S. 1015, 132 S. Ct. 559,

181 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8025.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Meeting

NAME: Task Group Session of the Safety and Occupational Health Study 
Section (SOHSS), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH); agenda revision.

SUMMARY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of 
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a notice in 
the Federal Register of May 14, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 93, Page 26807-
26808), concerning the Task Group Session of the Safety and 
Occupational Health Study Section review of Request for Application 
(RFA) Number 98030, entitled, ``Occupational Radiation and Energy-
related Health Research Grants.''

ACTION: Because of demands on the review process, the review, 
discussion and evaluation of RFA Number 98030 will be deferred to the 
October 29--30, 1998 meeting of the Safety and Occupational Health 
Study Section. The remainder of the previously published agenda for the 
August 5-7, 1998 meeting is unchanged.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Pervis C. Major, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Coordination and Special 
Projects, Office of the Director, NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, 
Morgantown, West Virginia 26505. Telephone 304/285-5979.

    Dated: July 14, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-19488 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
No. 11-5016.

#### Erick Daniel Davila, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 258,

181 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5700.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ ROBERT GREENBERGRobert GreenbergChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 9, 2007/s/ FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDERFrederick H. SchneiderChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)August 9, 2007
No. 11-6466.

#### Tony Blancarte, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 471,

181 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7535.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 455.
No. 11-5693.

#### Timothy Eugene Mack, Petitioner v. Larry Small, Warden.

565 U.S. 949, 132 S. Ct. 409,

181 L. Ed. 2d 268,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7374.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5601.

#### Juan Alcantar-Chagolla, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 333,

181 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5779.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10877.

#### Tabari Malik Zahir, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 184,

181 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6240.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 585.
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Jennifer Ziolkowski, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solid Biosciences Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 
Date: March 29, 2018  By: /s/ Jennifer Ziolkowski   Jennifer Ziolkowski   
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14317]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0197; Airspace Docket No. 14-AGL-5]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Michigan

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on May 6, 2014, proposing to amend Class E Airspace in the 
State of Michigan. The FAA has determined that withdrawal of the NPRM 
is warranted as additional analysis is needed.

DATES: The proposed rule published May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25756) is 
withdrawn as of June 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service 
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 
817-222-4075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An NPRM was published in the Federal 
Register of May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25756) to amend Title 14 Code of Federal 
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71, by amending Class E Airspace extending 
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface in the State of Michigan, to 
enable Minneapolis ARTCC to have greater latitude to use radar vectors 
and/or altitude changes that would provide a more efficient use of 
airspace within the NAS. Additional analysis is needed; therefore the 
NPRM is being withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the NPRM for FR Doc. FAA-2014-
0197, Airspace Docket No. 14-AGL-5, as published in the Federal 
Register of May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25756) (FR Doc. 2014-10336), is hereby 
withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 26, 2015.
Robert W. Beck,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-14317 Filed 6-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19770]



[[Page 39840]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-248-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice Establishing Technical 
Conferences

July 20, 1998.
    On July 10, 1998, the Commission issued an order \1\ in Docket No. 
RP98-248-000 the captioned docket requiring, among other things, a 
technical conference on Northwest Pipeline Corporation's proposal to 
institute an auction procedure to award various types of capacity and 
to reserve capacity for expansion under certain circumstances. The 
technical conference required by the July 10, 1998, order will be held 
at the time and place discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Northwest Pipeline Corporation, 84 FERC para. 61,012 (1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The technical conferences will convene at 10:00 a.m. on August 26, 
1998, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., in a room to be 
designated at that time. If necessary, the conference will continue 
through 5:30 p.m. of the same day.
    Any questions concerning the conferences should be directed to John 
M. Robinson (202) 208-0808.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19770 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M