Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)








ACIP Evidence to Recommendations Framework for  Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) Vaccination for Laboratory Workers						Print
																Related Pages
										**Question:**Should TBE vaccine be recommended for use in laboratory staff working with TBE virus?
**Population:** Laboratory staff working with TBE virus
**Intervention:** Vaccination with TBE vaccine according to recommended doses and schedules
**Comparison(s):** No TBE vaccination
**Outcomes:** Protection from disease after the 3-dose primary series and after a booster dose at 3 years following the primary series and serious adverse events**Background:**TBE is focally endemic in a geographic region extending from western and northern Europe through to eastern and northern Asia. TBE virus is primarily transmitted to humans by infected ticks, but other modes of transmission have been documented including through exposure to the virus in the laboratory. Currently, fewer than 10 U.S. laboratories work with TBE virus for diagnostic or research purposes; however, research activity might increase with the availability of a vaccine in the United States.
TBE virus transmission through virus aerosolization either during laboratory procedures or handling of infected animal waste has occurred, and transmission through accidental percutaneous or mucosal exposures is possible. At least 46 laboratory-acquired TBE virus infections have been reported in publications with the most recent case report published in 1995 (1, 2). Among these cases, at least four occurred among US laboratory workers.
Clinical manifestations of TBE virus infection can include febrile illness or neurologic disease, including meningitis, encephalitis, or meningoencephalomyelitis. No specific treatment is available and management is supportive. Mortality and sequelae rates vary with different subtypes of TBE virus, with mortality rates of 1–20%, and sequelae rates of 10–50%, reported from different areas (3).
On August 13, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a TBE vaccine (manufactured by Pfizer as TICOVAC) for use in persons aged ≥1 years. The vaccine is inactivated with a vaccination schedule of 3 primary doses, and 1 booster dose administered at ≥3 years after the primary series if there is ongoing risk of exposure. Pfizer has marketed a TBE vaccine in Europe for more than 40 years. The current formulation of the vaccine became available in 2001, and more than 75 million doses have been administered in Europe.
*Additional background information supporting the ACIP recommendations on the use of TBE vaccine can be found in the “Tick-Borne Encephalitis  Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices” document on the**ACIP website*.Problem
Problem
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the problem of public health importance?
No
Four cases of TBE virus infection have been reported among US laboratorians working with TBE virus. Among them, three were cases of overt disease, and one case was an asymptomatic infection. There were two deaths. All cases occurred prior to 1979. Based on these data, TBE cannot be considered a problem of public health importance overall. However, for laboratorians working with TBE virus the disease is a concern because of the risk of a potentially severe disease that can result in death or permanent sequelae.Benefits and Harms
Benefits and Harms
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationHow substantial are the desirable anticipated effects?
Large
Results of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evaluation were used to address this question (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) GRADE | CDC). Results from 10 observational studies among adults and children with data at 1 month after the 3-dose primary series indicated seropositivity was high (≥96%) in all but one study. When subjects in one of the adult and one of the pediatric studies were followed up at 3 years after the primary series (i.e., immediately prior to the booster dose), seropositivity remained high (≥94%). Two observational studies with data after a booster dose, including one adult and one pediatric study, demonstrated that seropositivity rates were high at 1 month (100%), 5 years (≥94%), and 10 years (≥85%) later.
There are no efficacy data for the TBE vaccine and low TBE incidence would make trials infeasible. No field effectiveness studies for the FDA-approved TBE vaccine alone are available, but an Austrian study showed a vaccine effectiveness estimate of 99% during a period when 90%–95% of the TBE vaccine in use was the FDA-approved TBE vaccine (8). These data were not included in the GRADE as subjects were vaccinated according to the Austrian schedule and many persons received the older TBE vaccine formulation.
Using immunogenicity data creates some uncertainties. A neutralizing antibody titer of ≥10 (at 50% cut off) is generally used to indicate protection, but there is no established correlate of protection./div>
The vaccine is based on a European subtype TBE virus, one of three main subtypes. Limited data from human and animal studies and the genetic and antigenic similarity of the subtypes suggest there likely is cross-protection, but protection against infection from subtypes found in eastern parts of the TBE endemic region has not been proven./div>How substantial are the undesirable anticipated effects?
Minimal
The GRADE assessment found no serious adverse events considered vaccine-related (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) GRADE | CDC) among ~7,000 adult and pediatric subjects who received ≥1 dose of vaccine in the primary series in four randomized controlled and nine observational studies. Among ~2,700 subjects in three active post-marketing surveillance studies, only one serious adverse event was considered vaccine-related and that event had possible contributing factors.
The vaccine has been used for >20 years in Europe with >75 million doses administered and no safety signal has been identified. However, no English language publications describe results from post-marketing adverse event surveillance in large populations.Do the desirable effects outweigh the undesirable effects?
Favors intervention
With high seropositivity rates following vaccination and no serious safety concerns identified, the desirable effects of a vaccine to prevent a rare but potentially serious, untreatable disease outweigh the undesirable effects.
To ensure appropriate laboratory staff are vaccinated, a local institutional biosafety committee should undertake a risk assessment of the potential for exposure to TBE virus considering the type of work to be performed and the biosafety level at which work is being conducted.What is the overall certainty of this evidence for the critical outcomes?
Effectiveness of the intervention is Level 3 (low)
Safety of the intervention is Level 2 (moderate)
The overall certainty of the evidence for protection from disease was level 3 (low) based on 1) Results from observational studies only; 2) Indirectness because the likelihood of protection from disease was based on seropositivity with no established correlate of protection and the likely but unconfirmed protection against non-European TBE virus subtypes; and 3) Upgrading for magnitude of effect (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) GRADE | CDC).
The overall certainty of the evidence for serious adverse events was level 2 (moderate). Data were available from randomized controlled trials but evidence type was downgraded because of the risk of bias from inadequate blinding (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) GRADE | CDC).Values
Values
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationDoes the target population feel that the desirable effects are large relative to undesirable effects?
Yes
There is no published information on how much laboratorians might value TBE vaccination. However scientists who understand the risks of disease and are aware of the good immunogenicity and safety profile of the vaccine are likely to value a preventive measure for a potentially severe disease with possibly serious outcomes.
Shortly after the announcement of licensure of a TBE vaccine, laboratory managers reported inquiries from staff about vaccine availability, suggesting interest in the vaccine.Is there important uncertainty about or variability in how much people value the main outcomes?
No important uncertainty or variability
Although there are always a very small number of individuals who refuse vaccination, most laboratory staff working with TBE virus are likely to understand the risks and benefits and place value on availability of a vaccine.Acceptability
Acceptability
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention acceptable to key stakehold-ers?
Yes
Key stakeholders were considered to be individuals who make decisions on institutional vaccination policies (e.g., biosafety committee members, occupational health directors) and laboratorians in research and diagnostic laboratories. Vaccine availability will improve safety. When vaccines for other flaviviral diseases are available (e.g., yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis vaccines), vaccine policy usually encourages vaccination. Vaccine availability will also remove a barrier to research.Resource Use
Resource Use
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention a reasonable and efficient allocation of resources?
Yes
A cost-effectiveness analysis has not been conducted, but vaccination recommendations will be for a small number of staff undertaking diagnostic or research work with TBE virus. Currently, fewer than 10 laboratories in the United States work with TBE virus.
Vaccination is likely to be considered by management officials to be a reasonable use of resources to improve safety and reduce the risk of an adverse outcome among staff working with TBE virus. Vaccination is a small cost for administrators to pay to avoid the impact and costs of a worker being infected with TBE virus in the event of a laboratory accident.Equity
Equity
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationWhat would be the impact of the intervention on health equity?
Probably increased
TBE vaccine will likely be paid for by employers. Equity will be increased as it will improve safety for those staff who are at occupational risk of a potentially severe disease.Feasibility
Feasibility
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention feasible to implement?
Yes
There are no special requirements for storage or administration of this inactivated vaccine, and vaccination is likely to build on routine mechanisms for vaccination of laboratory workers against other occupationally-related vaccine-preventable diseases.Balance of consequences
Desirable consequences clearly outweigh undesirable consequences in most settings.
Is there sufficient information to move forward with a recommendation? Yes.
Policy options for ACIP consideration
ACIP recommends the intervention
Draft recommendation (text)
TBE vaccine is recommended for laboratory workers with a potential for exposure to TBE virus.
Additional considerations (optional)
The recommendations will be presented with additional text to provide clear information and allow appropriate interpretation (see MMWR Recommendations and Reports document).
Final deliberation and decision by the ACIP
ACIP recommends the interventionReferences
Avsic-Zupanc T, Poljak M, Maticic M, et al. Laboratory acquired tick-borne meningoencephalitis: characterisation of virus strains. Clin Diagn Virol 1995;4:51–59.
The Subcommittee on Arbovirus Laboratory Safety of the American Committee on Arthropod-Borne Viruses. Laboratory safety for arboviruses and certain other viruses of vertebrates. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1980;29:1359–81.
Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 2008;371:1861–71.
Heinz FX, Holzmann H, Essl A, Kundi M. Field effectiveness of vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine. 2007 Oct 23;25):7559–67.Top of Page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  October 31, 2023						Source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeACIP Home
Meeting Information
Committee Informationplus icon
Role of the ACIP in CDC’s Vaccine Recommendations
Charter
Economics Studies
Committee Membersplus icon
ACIP Membership Roster
Apply for ACIP Membership
Work Groupsplus icon
VaST Reportsplus icon
June 28, 2021
May 24, 2021
May 17, 2021
March 29, 2021
Recommendationsplus icon
Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations
Evidence Based Recommendationsplus icon
About GRADE
Grade Evidence Tables
Evidence to Recommendations Frameworks Vaccines & ImmunizationsImmunization SchedulesVFC ResolutionsVaccine Information Statements (VISs)
  1600 Clifton Road, N.E., Mailstop A27
Atlanta, GA 30329-4027acip@cdc.gov


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue