alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
What do CDC data tell 

us about the COVID-19 

pandemic’s effects on 

Routine Childhood 

Vaccination? 

After the COVID-19 pandemic started, we saw a concerning drop in childhood routine vaccinations. Provider 

vaccine orders for children through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program decreased by 14% in 2020 after 

the national COVID-19 public health emergency was declared. 

SIGNS OF IMPROVEMENT 

Childhood vaccine orders through the Vaccines 

for Children (VFC) program and administration 

have steadily rebounded. As of January 2023, 

childhood VFC vaccine orders are within 1% or 

exceed pre-pandemic levels. 

Vaccination coverage has remained 

high and stable overall among 

young children, with coverage of 

more than 9 in 10 children for most 

recommended vaccines nationally 

Kindergarten vaccination 

for all vaccines and in a majority 

of states over the past 2 school 

years to lowest levels in a 

decade. 

Combined 7-vaccine series 

coverage by age 24 months

fell 4-5% among children 

living below poverty or in 

rural areas. 

coverage has steadily declined IMPROVEMENT NEEDED 

Vaccination coverage among 

certain groups declined since the 

start of the COVID-19 pandemic 

and may have not yet recovered. 4 - 5% 4 - 5% 

point drop point drop 

At least 1⁄4 Million 

children that entered kindergarten 

during the pandemic are potentially 

susceptible to vaccine preventable 

disease. 

Disparities in vaccination coverage by race/ethnicity, income, and 

insurance status that existed prior to the pandemic persisted in 

2021 but did not worsen during the pandemic. However disparities 

IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED worsened for young children living in rural areas. 

We must act now to catch up children who delayed or missed 

getting routine vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Getting routine immunizations back on track is a goal that we can achieve by working 

together to reduce barriers, increase access, and strengthen vaccine conÿdence. 

LEARN 

MORE: 

Routine Immunizations on Schedule for Everyone | 2022 Data Review 

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/partners/routine-immunizations-lets-rise.html 

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/childvaxview/index.html 

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/schoolvaxview/index.html
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR' CONSENT

We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  E'town   Corporation's
Registration  Statement No. 33-316713 on Form S-3 and Nos.  33-49812,  33-44210
and  33-42509 on Forms S-8 of our reports  dated  February 18, 1998 (except for
Note 11 to the  financial  statements  as to which  the date is March 6,  1998)
and  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Elizabethtown  Water  Company's
Registration  Statement  No.  33-19600  on  Form  S-8  and  Nos.  33-68579  and
33-51917 on Forms S-3 of our report  dated  February  18,  1998,  appearing  or
incorporated  by  reference  in  this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  E'town
Corporation  and  Elizabethtown  Water Company for the year ended  December 31,
1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 27, 1998
No. 11M27.

#### Bobbie Tates, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 444,

181 L. Ed. 2d 253,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7430.

October 11, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT May 31, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, DUCK, TEXTURED NYLON, 500 DENIER

Shade Number DESERT SAND 503 Piece/Roll Number 3766

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3766 64.53 3.33 10.32

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SAMPLES READ 2 TIMES AND 

AVERAGED
Unassociated Document


Long Term Strategic Agreement


 


(English Translation)


 


Party A: Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Handan Steel Group – Beijing Office


 


In consideration of the premises and mutual terms, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth regarding the supply and demand of iron ore concentrates, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. Party A agrees to sell all of iron ore concentrates that produced by Party A to Party B, no matter the variation of the market.


 


2. Party B agrees to purchase all of iron ore concentrates that produced by Party A for Handan Steel Group, no matter of the variation of the market.


 


3. Party A shall maintain the quality of the iron ore concentrates: Acid iron ore concentrates Tfe>=65%, S<=0.5%, SiO2<=6.5%, TiO2<=1.9%, Degree of finess-200>=70%, Water content<=9%; Alkaline iron ore concentrates: Tfe>=64%, S<=0.3%, SiO2<=4%, MgO>=2.5%, Water content<=9%, R>=0.8%.


 


4. Price. The selling price of iron ore concentrates shall base on listing price of Handan Steel Group and remains certain profit for Party A after deduction of transportation cost and wear and tear. It shall be adjusted frequently to reflect the fluctuation of the listing price of Handan Steel Group.


 


5. Party B shall bear the transportation responsibility.


 


6. Product Quality Acceptance. The production quality approval shall base on both Party A and Party B’s inspection reports. If both inspection reports are different, both parties shall solve the issues by negotiation.


 


7. Payment. Party B shall make payments to Party A when Party B picks up the products.


 


8. The validity of this Agreement is ten years.


 


9. There are two copies of this Agreement, held by both parties.


 


10. All other miscellaneous shall be solved by the negotiation between both parties.


 


Party A: Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Co., Ltd.                         Party B: Handan Steel Group – Beijing Office


 


Date: 01/16/2009                                                            Date: 01/16/2009


 


/s/_________________                                                     /s/______________________
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 17102 STANDARD 57.83 4.65 15.70

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number KHAKI 3729 Piece/Roll Number 17102

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT December 28, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, TROPICAL, 75/25 

POLYESTER/WOOL

PD 04-06

PD 06-06

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 11-5860.

#### Jimmy Fletcher Meders, Petitioner v. Hilton Hall, Warden.

565 U.S. 965, 132 S. Ct. 458,

181 L. Ed. 2d 298,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7490.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.
No. 10-1465.

#### Herbert Fletcher, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 110,

181 L. Ed. 2d 36,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5230.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.

v.

PATRICK F. COSTANTINO, A/K/A PASQUALE F. COSTANTINO, A/KA/ PATRICK COSTANTINO, KAREN E. COSTANTINO, A/K/A KAREN ANN

KARBOSKI AND THE UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA

PETITION OF: PATRICK F. COSTANTINO, A/K/A PASQUALE F. COSTANTINO, A/KA/ PATRICK

COSTANTINO :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 296 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 20-01 STANDARD 24.32 0.78 -8.74

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 16, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, 100% SD POLYESTER LINING A-A-52106

(CLASS 3)

Shade Number AF BLUE 1086 Piece/Roll Number 20-01
No. 10-9837.

#### Levi A. Wilson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 931, 132 S. Ct. 370,

181 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7049,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 822.
1. Use the correct syringe and needle.

 Administer vaccine using either a 1-mL or 3-mL syringe.

 Use a 22- to 25-gauge needle.

 Use the correct needle length based on the patient’s gender and weight. For adults, use a 1- to 1.5-inch needle.

2. Identify the injection site.

 Recommended site: Deltoid muscle in the upper arm 

 Use anatomical landmarks to determine the injection site. The deltoid muscle is a 

large, rounded, triangular shape. Find the acromion process, which is the bony point 

at the end of the shoulder. The injection site will be approximately 2 inches below the 

bone and above the axillary fold/armpit.

3. Administer the vaccine correctly.

 Inject the vaccine into the middle and thickest part of the muscle. Insert the needle at 

a 90-degree angle and inject all of the vaccine in the muscle tissue.

 If administering more than one vaccine in the same arm, separate the injection sites 

by 1 inch if possible.

Administer these vaccines by IM injection:

 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)

 Hepatitis A (HepA)

 Hepatitis B (HepB)

 Hepatitis A and hepatitis B 

(HepA-HepB)

 Human papillomavirus (HPV 

vaccine)

 Influenza vaccine, inactivated (IIV)

 Influenza vaccine, recombinant 

(RIV4)

 Meningococcal conjugate 

(MenACWY)

 Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB)

 Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13)

 Pneumococcal polysaccharide 

(PPSV23)* 

 Tetanus and diphtheria toxoid (Td)

 Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria 

toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)

 Zoster, recombinant (RZV) 

*May also be administered by subcutaneous injection

1 in (25 mm)

*Some experts recommend a 5/8-inch needle for men and women who weigh less than 60 kg (130 lbs). If used, the skin must be stretched fully

 and the subcutaneous tissues must not be bunched.

1.5 in (38 mm) OR

 1 in (25 mm) 1.5 in (38 mm)

Men and women,

less than 60 kg* (130 lbs)

Men and women,

60–70 kg (130–152 lbs)

Men,

70–118 kg (152–260 lbs)

Women,

70–90 kg (152–200 lbs)

Men, greater than

118 kg (>260 lbs)

Women, greater than

90 kg (>200 lbs)

To ensure vaccines are safe and effective, it’s important to prepare and administer them correctly:

 Follow aseptic technique.

 Use a new needle and syringe for each injection.

 Perform hand hygiene before vaccine preparation, between 

patients, when changing gloves (if worn), and any time hands 

become soiled.‡

‡Gloves are not required unless the person administering the vaccine is likely to come in contact with potentially infectious body fluids or has open lesions on 

the hands. If worn, perform hand hygiene and change gloves between patients.

Scapula

Injection

site

Acromion

process

Deltoid

muscle

Humerus

Axillary

fold/

armpit

11/16/20

U.S. D

Heal

Cente

Cont

For additional information, go to CDC's 

vaccine administration resource library at 

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/admin/resource-library.html.

Vaccine Administration: 

Intramuscular (IM) Injection 

Adults 19 years of age and older
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51502 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. LORENZO FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-MENDEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1344-ALL Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Lorenzo Francisco RamirezMendez raises arguments that are foreclosed by A lmendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D July 9, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51502

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 


 


 


 


March 28, 2012













Keith Asato


Hoku Corporation


1288 Ala Moana Blvd., Ste. 220


Honolulu, Hawaii 96814


 


 


Dear Keith:


 


I am pleased to inform you that the Compensation Committee of the Hoku Corporation Board of Directors has implemented a special retention bonus program for you.  Under the program, you will be eligible to receive a cash bonus payment in the target amount of twenty percent (20%) of your base salary at the rate in effect as of the date hereof (the “Target Bonus”).  The Target Bonus shall become payable in accordance with the following schedule:







•           Forty percent (40%) of the Target Bonus shall become payable to you provided you serve as Hoku Corporation’s principal accounting officer through the date Hoku Corporation’s Form 10-K for fiscal year is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); and







•           Sixty percent (60%) of the Target Bonus shall become payable to you in three equal installments of twenty percent (20%) of the Target Bonus each provided you serve as Hoku Corporation’s principal accounting officer through the date Hoku Corporation’s Form 10-Q is filed for the first, second and third fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2013.







Any portion of the Target Bonus that becomes payable to you based on your continued service as Hoku Corporation’s principal accounting officer will be paid to you within thirty (30) days after the date the Form 10-K or Form 10-Q, as applicable, is filed with the SEC.  In no event shall any such bonus be paid later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year for which that bonus is earned.  The bonus payment will be subject to all applicable federal, state and local income and employment withholding taxes, and you will only receive the net amount remaining after those taxes have been withheld.  This retention bonus program shall not in any way change your status as an at-will employee.


 







Hoku Corporation · Hoku Solar, Inc. · Hoku Materials, Inc.


1288 Ala Moana Boulevard Suite 220 · Honolulu, Hawai’i  96814 · Tel 808-682-7800 · Fax 808-440-0357 · www.hokucorp.com




  





  











  




		
Keith Asato


Hoku Corporation


1288 Ala Moana Blvd., Ste. 220


Honolulu, Hawaii 96814


March 28, 2012


Page 2 of  2


















 


 


We are pleased to make this special bonus program available to you as a meaningful incentive to serve as Hoku Corporation’s principal accounting officer.  Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions governing your participation in the retention bonus program by signing and dating this letter and returning it to me by March 31, 2012.


 




	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Scott Paul	 
	 	
Scott Paul



Chief Executive Officer



	 

















ACCEPTANCE







I hereby accept and agree to the terms and conditions set forth above that are to govern my participation in the retention bonus program.


 




	 	/s/ Keith Asato	 
	 	
Keith Asato

	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 
Dated:  March 28, 2012
DLA Distribution Albany, Georgia

Mr. Andre Charlton

Director

Andre Charlton is a native of St. Petersburg, Florida, and a retired Army Chief 

Warrant Officer Four. He began his logistics career in 1989 with the Army 

Quartermaster Corp, where he served 25 years in progressively difficult and 

prestigious assignments, before retiring in 2014. 

Charlton’s military assignments include General Supply Officer; Special 

Operation Command (SOCOM), MacDill Air Force Base, Florida; Senior 

Evaluator, Chief of Staff Army, Supply Excellence Award Team (SEA); and 

Support Operations Officer (FWD) 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, Forward 

Operating Base(FOB) Kalsu, Iraq and numerous platoon, and supply support 

activity leadership positions supporting Aviation, Light Infantry, Combat 

Engineer Heavy, and Armored Cavalry units.

His civilian career began in 2014 with the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, as the Chief of 

Distribution. In November 2016, he returned to his roots with the Department of Defense. As member of DLA 

Distribution J3 Infrastructure Management team, he served as the program manager for the Location Identification 

Program. In 2018, Charton became the deputy director at DLA Distribution Albany before assuming the position 

of director in 2019. 

He has been recognized for his hard work and dedication as a civilian with an Employee of the Quarter award, 

Office of the Director’s Honor’s award, Transformation Team award, Organization Team award, as well as numerous 

time off and cash awards. 

Charlton holds a bachelor’s degree in Transportation and Logistics Management, and has earned a Lean Six Sigma 

Green Belt.

His military awards and decoration include Legion of Merit, Bronze Star (2nd award), Meritorious Service Medal 

(2nd award), Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Army Accommodation Medal (4th award), Army 

Achievement Medal (3rd award), National Defense Service Medal (2nd award), Iraq Campaign Medal (4th award), 

Armed Forces Service Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon (6th award), NATO Medal, Meritorious Unit Citation, 

Army Superior Unit Award, and Joint Meritorious Unit Commendation.
No. 11-219.

#### Sandi D. Jackson, as Next Friend and Parent of Keely A. Jackson, a Minor Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years Old, Petitioner v. Rashondalyn Nixon, et al.

565 U.S. 964, 132 S. Ct. 462,

181 L. Ed. 2d 296,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7477.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 469 Fed. Appx. 411.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 06054 STANDARD 18.68 -0.07 -0.84

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 17, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED, FLEECE VELOUR, 

FLAME RESISTENT PD 4631-04-01

Shade Number BLACK 3239 Piece/Roll Number 06054
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ ROBERT GREENBERG

Robert GreenbergChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 9, 2007/s/ FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDER

Frederick H. SchneiderChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 9, 2007
(1) Adjusting Price $17.22 CWT

(2) Base Price $17.15 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.07

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0060

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0030

Price change per quart $0.0015

Price change per pint $0.0008

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0006

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0005

Price change per half pint $0.0004

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Jan. 6, 2018
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*Date:
                July 23, 2007*
            By:
            /s/*Edward
                A. Cespedes**Edward
                A. Cespedes**Chief
                Financial Officer*
No. 11-5723.

#### Louis Stillis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 343,

181 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7109.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 78.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 60736 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
OSCAR ALFREDO BURGON

- URREA, also known as Oscar Alfredo Burgos

Urrea, also known as Oscar Alfredo Burgos Ureea, also known as Oscar Alfredo Burgos, also known as Oscar Alfrdo Burgos, also known as Oscar Alfredo , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:18

- CR

- 9

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Alfredo Burgon

- Urrea has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Burgon

- Urrea h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 1, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-60736 Document: 00515183957 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2019No. 18

- 60736

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-60736 Document: 00515183957 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2019