alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.A**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Douglas L. Foshee, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of El Paso Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisReport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: July 8, 2005         */s/ Douglas L. Foshee*   Douglas L. Foshee   President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


*Dated:
                August 14, 2008*
            By:
            /s/*Edward
                A. Cespedes**Edward
                A. Cespedes**Chief
                Financial Officer*
Children < 6 years with 2+ Immunizations 

in a Registry, 2002

National coverage = 43%

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%

VT 0

NH 3

MA 6

RI 79

CT 61

NJ 15

DE 81

MD 10

DC 88

98 0

19

50 45

55

99

45

13

47

100

95

65

94

59

43

54 15

6

27

5

80

36

45

65

91

78

51

94

43

78

18

77

28

79

61

27 63

16

53

41

0

Source: Immunization Registry Annual Report, CY2002
No. 11-137.

#### Vida Baptista, Petitioner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., aka Washington Mutual Bank.

565 U.S. 883, 132 S. Ct. 253,

181 L. Ed. 2d 146,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5261.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 1194.
Exhibit 11.1

                               Loss per share

Computation of loss per share

                          Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                             September 30,                  September 30,
                         1998            1997            1998           1997
                         ----            ----            ----           ----
                              (unaudited)                     (unaudited)

Basic:
Net Loss               ($5,689,135)   ($1,783,261)   ($11,513,405)  ($2,550,697)

Net loss applicable
to common stockholders ($5,689,135)   ($1,783,261)   ($11,513,405)  ($2,550,697)
                       ===========    ===========    ============   =========== 

Basic weighted
average shares
outstanding              1,200,417      1,154,271       1,174,398     1,144,510
                       ===========    ===========    ============   =========== 

Basic loss per common
share                       ($4.74)        ($1.54)         ($9.80)      ($2.23)
                       ===========    ===========    ============   =========== 

Diluted:
Net loss applicable
to common stockholders ($5,689,135)   ($1,783,261)   ($11,513,405)  ($2,550,697)
                       ===========    ===========    ============   =========== 

Basic weighted
average shares
outstanding              1,200,417      1,154,271       1,174,398     1,144,510

Net effect of
dilutive securities             0               0               0             0
                       -----------    -----------    ------------   ----------- 

Diluted weighted
average shares
outstanding              1,200,417      1,154,271       1,174,398     1,144,510
                       ===========    ===========    ============   =========== 
Diluted loss per
common share                ($4.74)        ($1.54)         ($9.80)       ($2.23)
                       ===========    ===========    ============   ===========
No. 11-365.

#### Svetlana Karpeeva, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 590,

181 L. Ed. 2d 423,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8190.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 919.
No. 09-958.

No. 09-1158.

No. 10-283.

#### Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. (two judgments). Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. California Pharmacists Association, et al.; Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. California Hospital Association, et al.; Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.; and Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Lydia Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Lisa Brown, et al. Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, et al.

565 U.S. 1010, 132 S. Ct. 546,

181 L. Ed. 2d 393,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7921.

November 4, 2011.

The parties and the Solicitor General are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “What should be the effect, if any, of the developments discussed in the letter submitted by the Solicitor General on October 28, 2011, on the proper disposition of this case?” Briefs, in letter format, limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, November 18, 2011.
#### *Ex parte*Richard Harrison, *Alias*Richard Harris.

En Banc.

Decision Filed January 16, 1926.

*J. Azakiah Williams*and *Zach H. Douglas,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*J. B. Johnson,*Attorney General, and *J. B. Gaines,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the final order remanding the petitioner to custody, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said final order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
**2tt APRIL,** **2015**

### COUNTY**COURT AT** **LAW NO.** **FIVE BEXAR** **COUNTY, TEXAS** **FILE NUMBER** **NO.2015CV01073 ERASMO** **FIGUEROA APPELLANT** **V. VILLAS** **OF VISTA** **DEL NORTE** **APELLEE C;** **-o ...** **NOTICE OF** **APPEAL NOW** **COMES ERASMO** **FIGUEROA, APPELLATE,** **UNITED STATES** **DISTRICT COURT,** **4TH COURT** **OF APPEALS** **REQUESTING IN** **WRITING ALL** **SAID CASE** **FILES FROM** **COUNTY COURT** **AT LAW** **NO. FIVE,** **BEXAR COUNTY,** **TEXAS: I.)** **COURT REPORTER'S** **RECORDS 2.)** **CLERK'S RECORDS** **BE FORWARDED** **TO: UNITED STATES** **DISTRICT COURT** **4TH COURT** **OF APPEALS** **PAUL ELIZONDO TOWER** **SAN ANTONIO,** **TEXAS. Respectfully,** **ERASMO FIGUEROA** **APPELLANT '-o**
No. 11-5436.

#### Anthony Winston Uckele, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 311,

181 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5906.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION EN BANC

Appellate case name: Thomas Wayne Florence v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00822-CR

Trial court case number: 10CR1217

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

Date motion filed: August 16, 2013

Party filing motion: appellant, Thomas Wayne Florence

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

 Acting for the Court

The en banc court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Sharp, Massengale, and Brown.

Date: November 26, 2013
Exhibit 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Form
    
    Registration NumberS-8
    
    333-72445
    
    1998 Incentive Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-128157
    
    1998 Incentive Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-11653
    
    Employees Savings and Profit-Sharing PlanS-8
    
    333-10091
    
    1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee DirectorsS-8
    
    333-55280
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Savings Plan 401(k)S-8
    
    333-137187
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Savings Plan 401(k)S-8
    
    333-151587
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Incentive
Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-151609
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Associate Stock
Ownership Plan
No. 11-253.

#### Ariel King, Petitioner v. Michael Pfeiffer.

565 U.S. 977, 132 S. Ct. 507,

181 L. Ed. 2d 348,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7780.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 194 Md. App. 730 and 194 Md. App. 733.
No. 11M30.

#### Joseph H. Evans, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 444,

181 L. Ed. 2d 253,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7307.

October 11, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3031 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3031

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend funding for 
 quality measure endorsement, input, and selection under the Medicare 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2019

 Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Mr. Engel, and Mr. Carter of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend funding for 
 quality measure endorsement, input, and selection under the Medicare 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FUNDING FOR QUALITY MEASURE ENDORSEMENT, INPUT, 
              AND SELECTION UNDER MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1890(d)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395aaa(d)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and $7,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$7,500,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``and 2019.'' and inserting ``and 2019, and 
        $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.''.
                                 <all>
```
Join the DLA SAPR Team in taking part in the virtual Teal Ribbon Relay. Everyone is 

encouraged to walk, run, bike, etc., and track miles in April to show support for victims 

of sexual violence. Roughly 1,026 miles connects DLA MSCs, so let’s get out and raise 

enterprise-wide awareness and support for survivors! Reach out to your HQs J/D Code 

or MSC SARC for more details and to submit your miles weekly.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40131-40132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Retail Sales in Yorktown, Virginia; Notice

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession contract authorizing retail sales for 
the public in Yorktown, Virginia within Colonial National Historical 
Park for a period for five (5) years from date of contract execution.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 13, 1998.


[[Page 40132]]


ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact National Park Service, 
Colonial National Historical Park, P.O. Box 210, Yorktown, VA 23690, or 
phone (757) 898-3400, to obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the 
requirements of the proposed contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contract has been determined to be 
categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared.
    The existing concessioner has performed its obligations to the 
satisfaction of the Secretary under an existing contract which expired 
by limitation of time on December 31, 1990, and therefore pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 5 of the Act of October 9, 1965 (79 Stat. 
969; 16 U.S.C. 20), is entitled to be given preference in the renewal 
of the contract and in the negotiation of a new contract, providing 
that the existing concessioner submits a responsive offer (a timely 
offer which meets the terms and conditions of the Prospectus). This 
means that the contract will be awarded to the party submitting the 
best offer, provided that if the best offer was not submitted by the 
existing concessioner, then the existing concessioner will be afforded 
the opportunity to match the best offer. If the existing concessioner 
agrees to match the best offer, then the contract will be awarded to 
the existing concessioner.
    If the existing concessioner does not submit a responsive offer, 
the right of preference in renewal shall be considered to have been 
waived, and the contract will then be awarded to the party that has 
submitted the best responsive offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. Any proposal, including that of the existing 
concessioner, must be received by the Superintendent, Colonial National 
Historical Park, not later than the seventy-fifth (75th) day following 
publication of this notice to be considered and evaluated.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
P. Tremblay,
Acting Superintendent, Colonial National Historical Park.
[FR Doc. 98-19968 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Date of Posting...................

Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Item #

(K0000) Location Origin

# of 

Units Bulk Wt (lbs) WO3 (%)

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates Offering

FISCAL YEAR 2023

Basic Ordering Agreement... DLA-Stockpile Materials-001-(BOA) - Tungsten Ores & Concentrates

July 17, 2023

July 18, 2023

12:00pm

WO3 

(lbsWO3) W (lbsW ) WO3 (STU) Lot # Type

Total Total Total Total Total

706 Scotia, NY P-2767 Synthetic Scheelite Australia 81 101160 74.00 74858.400 59362.711 3742.924

712 Scotia, NY P-3188-B Synthetic Scheelite Argentina 173 63685 73.77 46980.425 37255.477 2349.047

737 Scotia, NY P-2999-D Synthetic Scheelite Argentina 60 64557 71.26 46003.318 36480.631 2300.185

1356 Scotia, NY 85 Huebnerite Unknown 161 68155 73.93 50386.992 39956.884 2519.314

658 439,888 318,559 252,617 15,928

1319 Scotia, NY 180 Ferberite Bolivia 127 65795 71.91 47313.185 37519.355 2365.620

1446 Scotia, NY 9 Wolframite Spain 56 76536 69.27 53016.487 42042.074 2650.781
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 23, 2018

NO. 03-17-00517-CV

James Andy Fry, Appellant

v.

Michael John Lucksinger and J. Allan Garrett, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the orders dismissing appellant’s claims signed by the trial court on 

January 30, and January 31, 2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the 

Court holds that there was no reversible error in the orders. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s orders dismissing appellant’s claims. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and the court below.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8146** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News . Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00048

- RBS

- TEM

- 1 )

Submitted : June 1 , 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., appeals the district court’s order treating his motion for writ of mandamu s as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U. S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional righ t. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Braddy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EMBASSY OF BANDARIA

WASHINGTON DC

 OFFICE OF MILITARY COOPERATION

 01 January 2021

DLA Disposition Services

Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center

Attn: OIR(FMS)

74 Washington Ave

Battle Creek, MI 49017

SUBJECT: Letter of Request (LOR) to Support the Bandarian Armed Forces

1. Request establishment of a new blanket order case for CONUS procurement of 

Sustainment to support the Bandarian Armed Forces (BAF). This Foreign Military Sales 

(FMS) case will be used to acquire a variety of Excess Defense Articles (EDA) from 

DLA Disposition Services in support of the current military modernization efforts.

2. The BAF would like to procure property under the following Federal Stock Classes 

(FSC’s):

2520 - Vehicular Power Transmission Components

2610 - Tires and Tubes, Pneumatic, Except Aircraft

2815 - Diesel Engines and Components

2910 - Engine Fuel System Components, Non aircraft

3030 - Belting, Drive Belts, Fan Belts, and Accessories

3. The Total case value will be $500,000.00 (including fees and transportation) 

4. These items will be shipped through US transportation system using a Delivery Term 

Code of 7 (door to door).

5. These items should be delivered to the following location MAPAC: BAN000

6. The total value of this LOR cannot be exceeded without authorization from COL Bob 

Bandaria, Bandarian Armaments Sections ++555-1-5555-555, bob.bandaria@BDA.BD. 

Prior approval is required to adjust quantities or change requirements.

General William Bandaria

BAF Logistics Commander
#### *State, Petitioner, v. Anderson, Respondent,*

No. 91814-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45497-1-II, May 19, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 706. *Granted*and *remanded*to the Court of Appeals November 4, 2015.
No. 11-6552.

#### Eddie Carrillo, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 991, 132 S. Ct. 532,

181 L. Ed. 2d 373,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7689.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 325.
No. 10-10217.

#### Janet B. Cunningham, Petitioner v. Jack V. Kelley, et ux.

565 U.S. 1034, 132 S. Ct. 573,

181 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8157.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

*421Same case below, 53 So. 3d 1034.