37562 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 133 / Monday, July 13, 1998 / Notices

[FR Doc. 98–18573 Filed 7–10–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Issuance of Decisions and

Orders During the Week of May 11

Through May 15, 1998

During the week of May 11 through

May 15, 1998, the decisions and orders

summarized below were issued with

respect to appeals, applications,

petitions, or other requests filed with

the Office of Hearings and Appeals of

the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Copies of the full text of these

decisions and orders are available in the

Public Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, 950 L’Enfant

Plaza, SW, Washington, DC, Monday

through Friday, except federal holidays.

They are also available in Energy

Management: Federal Energy

Guidelines, a commercially published

loose leaf reporter system. Some

decisions and orders are available on

the Office of Hearings and Appeals

World Wide Web site at http://

www.oha.doe.gov.

Dated: July 6, 1998.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Decision List No. 85; Week of May 11

Through May 15, 1998

Appeal

Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., 5/11/98,

VEA–0008

The Office of Hearings and Appeals

considered an Appeal filed by

Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company

(CG&E) from a determination issued on

December 8, 1997, by the Office of

Energy Efficiency and Renewable

Energy (EE) of the Department of Energy

(DOE), under provisions of 10 CFR Part

490 (Alternative Fuel Transportation

Program). In its determination, EE

partially granted a request by CG&E to

receive credits under the Part 490

program for certain 1997 Model Year

vehicles which the firm converted to

alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs), but not

within four months after acquisition as

required under 10 CFR 490.305(c). EE

granted relief for such vehicles

converted by CG&E on or before August

31, 1997. However, in its Appeal, CG&E

sought additional credits for such

vehicles (30) converted by the firm

during the period September through

December 1997. After considering

evidence presented by CG&E concerning

delays encountered by the firm in

acquiring AFV conversion equipment,

the DOE determined that CG&E’s

Appeal should be granted in part.

Accordingly, the DOE granted CG&E

credits under the Part 490 program for

17 of the 30 converted AFVs subject to

its Appeal.

Refund Applications

The Office of Hearings and Appeals

issued the following Decisions and

Orders concerning refund applications,

which are not summarized. Copies of

the full texts of the Decisions and

Orders are available in the Public

Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals.

Atlantic Richfield Co./Arlington Oil Co. et al ................................................................................................... RF304–4889 5/11/98

Arlington Oil Co ................................................................................................................................................... RF304–4872

Enron Corporation/Chemplex Co ........................................................................................................................ RF340–182 5/13/98

Enron Corp./Heritage Propane ............................................................................................................................ RR340–00005 5/12/98

Midwest Haulers, Inc et al .................................................................................................................................. RK272–02843 5/12/98

Schlumberger Technology Corp .......................................................................................................................... RC272–00390 5/12/98

Dismissals

The following submissions were dismissed.

Name Case No.

Personnel Security Hearing .............................................................................................................................................................. VSO–0191

Personnel Security Hearing .............................................................................................................................................................. VSO–0195

Toombs County Commissioners ....................................................................................................................................................... RF272–98961

[FR Doc. 98–18570 Filed 7–10–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Issuance of Decisions and

Orders During the Week of May 18

Through May 22, 1998

During the week of May 18 through

May 22, 1998, the decisions and orders

summarized below were issued with

respect to appeals, applications,

petitions, or other requests filed with

the Office of Hearings and Appeals of

the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Copies of the full text of these

decisions and orders are available in the

Public Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, 950 L’Enfant

Plaza, SW, Washington, DC, Monday

through Friday, except federal holidays.

They are also available in Energy

Management: Federal Energy

Guidelines, a commercially published

loose leaf reporter system. Some

decisions and orders are available on

the Office of Hearings and Appeals

World Wide Web site at http://

www.oha.doe.gov.

Dated: July 6, 1998.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Decision List No. 86; Week of May 18

Through May 22, 1998

Appeals

James E. Minter, 5/18/98, VFA–0406

James E. Minter filed an Appeal from

a determination issued to him by the

Albuquerque Operations of the

Department of Energy (DOE) in response

to a Request for Information submitted

under the Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA). Mr. Minter’s request sought

records of overtime payments to a DOE

employee who, as allegedly part of his

job requirements, may have engaged in