alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 136

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVER**

**SELLERS** ***TTORNEI**

**GSNLRAL**



### ~~odable **Gibb** 

### Qilobrimt, Presideat &rionY turd and YeobanSoal Cal legs oi Tu8m COllSge BkCion, 

## tua*

**mar Yr.**  Gil **ahrirtr**

tbr ~peola’ l levee t8s iot 

### to pay naid **lwndr)** 

### la **Burlomon** 

### County **XXI- ’** 


### 1861, addreosed 

### to Honorable **ller of**  **the** Vnlrerni **ty of**  **Texms, ap**  **0, we**  

### held **that property**  conveyed to or the ume and benefit ni the ~nlterpt from 811 tuer- **Te thjnk**  **this to**  **the quentiim**  **you mtmlt,**  **and that**  IS exempt from the payrent of mid tax **to t.he**  **Rurles ntj**  **Jmpror9Pl~t nlstrlet**  **YO.** 1. **Te en**  Clone herewith II CODJ of Rafd opfnjon.

Xo addition 

### to the 

### authorjtier cited In the 8hore **opinion, we**  **0~11 your**  **attention to**  **an o~inlm**  **wrgtten by**  **the Ctwrt**  **of** Cjrll **Appeals** in **the ease**  **of** 

### Lowr Colorado **River Authority**  **v. Chemical**  **Bank &**  **Trust Company,**  

### 18R 6. ‘ 1. (2) **401, In**  **shlch the**  **Court of**  **Clril Appeal**  **I held**  **that the**  

### Lower **Colnraln River**  Authority was **exempt from**  **the pawent**  **of all**  tnxea on Its property r?-ich Is used for xorenment.al purposes.lmor8blr Glbb Gllohri~t - page 2

Thl8 

### 1K)?nln~, Ootober 31rt., the 

### Supreme **Court** l

### ffirred the fudpnent of ’ **the Court**  **af** Civil Appea111. 

### It Id tbemfere our 

### opinion **that the**  **Aglaul tural**  

### &Yeo b8nlr8I

Cellem

lo 

### l **ampt** 

### tram

tbo paymm t

of tax00 to tie Burlooom Oomtl Improbmetat 

### Dlmtrlet )lo+ 1.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


                      RE:        Fabri-Centers of America, Inc. Commission File
                                 No. 1-6695 1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K For
                                 Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1998

Gentlemen:

The above Company is the issuer of securities registered under Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"). Each of the persons signing his or
her name below confirms, as of the date appearing opposite his or her signature,
that Alan Rosskamm, Brian P. Carney, and each of them, are authorized on his or
her behalf to sign and to submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission such
filings on Form 10-K as are required by the Act. Each person so signing also
confirms the authority of Alan Rosskamm, Brian P. Carney, and each of them, to
do and perform on his or her behalf, any and all acts and things requisite or
necessary to assure compliance by the signing person with the Form 10-K filing
requirements. The authority confirmed herein shall remain in effect as to each
person signing his or her name below until such time as the Commission shall
receive from such person a written communication terminating or modifying the
authority.


                               Date                                      Date
/s/Alan Rosskamm                             /s/Scott Cowen
----------------           -----------       --------------           ----------
Alan Rosskamm                                Scott Cowen

/s/Brian P. Carney                           /s/Frank Newman
------------------         -----------       ---------------          ----------
Brian P. Carney                              Frank Newman

/s/Robert R. Gerber                          /s/Ira Gumberg
-------------------        -----------       --------------           ----------
Robert R. Gerber                             Ira Gumberg

/s/Betty Rosskamm                            /s/Gregg Searle
-----------------          -----------       ---------------          ----------
Betty Rosskamm                               Gregg Searle

/s/Alma Zimmerman
-----------------          -----------
Alma Zimmerman
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3144 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3144

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ``Jose Ramos Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOSE RAMOS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jose Ramos Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jose Ramos 
Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 11-5805.

#### Marshall Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 922, 132 S. Ct. 348,

181 L. Ed. 2d 219,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7114.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 758.
DESPUÉS DE UN DERRAME 

CEREBRAL PROVOCADO POR 

FUMAR, ACOSTÚMBRESE A 

PERDER SU INDEPENDENCIA.

Suzy, 62 años, Diagnósticada a los 57 años

Nueva York

Su hijo Daniel la cuida

Fumar le causa daño inmediato a su cuerpo. A Suzy le 

provocó coágulos sanguíneos que le causaron un

derrame cerebral. Usted puede dejar de fumar.

Para ayuda gratuita, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.42. APPENDIX 8.42**

**INVENTORY CONTROL POINT/INTEGRATED MATERIEL MANAGER MATERIEL RECEIPT STATUS(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)**

AP3.42-2

2

APPENDIX 3.42

AP8.42-1

APPENDIX 8.42
No. 11-6416.

#### Ruben Lee Russell El-Amin, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 525,

181 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7903.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### NUMBER 13 - 18 - 00 170 - C V 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JORGE RODRIGUEZ , Appellant ,
v. LIZZETTE RODRIGUEZ , Appellee

.

On a ppeal from the 3 89th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appell ant’s unopposed third motion for extension of time to file the brief. Appell ant’s brief was originally due to be filed on September 14, 2018. This Court granted appellant’s first motion for extension , giving appellant until October 29, 2018. Appellant subsequently filed a s econd motion for extension of time, and this Court granted the motion, giving appellant until November 14, 2018 to file his brief. Appellant filed a motion to supplement the clerk record, which this Court denied

.2 Appell ee ha s now filed a third motion req uesting additional time to file the appellate brief
in this cause. The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief and the extension previously granted in this cause, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appell ant ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. Appell ant ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby granted, and
the Honorable Alfredo Morales, Jr. , counsel for appellant , is hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or before February 13, 201 9

. FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WILL NOT BE FAVORABLY ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed t he 29th day of January, 2019.
No. 11-5773.

#### Nina Shahin, Petitioner v. Delaware Federal Credit Union.

565 U.S. 951, 132 S. Ct. 417,

181 L. Ed. 2d 272,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7452.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 11-6301.

#### Debra-Ann Wellman, Petitioner v. DuPont Dow Elastomers L.L.C., et al.

565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 555,

181 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7937.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 386.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3245 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3245

  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2019

Mr. Bucshon (for himself, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Foster, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
    Pence, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Rodney Davis of 
      Illinois, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. 
 Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Mr. Bost, Mr. Kinzinger, Mrs. 
  Walorski, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. Hollingsworth, Mr. Banks, Mr. 
  LaHood, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Baird, Ms. Underwood, Mr. 
Schneider, Mr. Rush, Mr. Carson of Indiana, and Mr. Garcia of Illinois) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restore the Harmony Way Bridge 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF BRIDGE AND LAND.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Act of April 12, 1941 (55 
Stat. 140, chapter 71), not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the White County Bridge Commission shall convey, 
without consideration, to the New Harmony River Bridge Authority and 
the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, any and all right, 
title, and interest of such Commission in and to the bridge across the 
Wabash River at or near New Harmony, Indiana, in the approaches 
thereto, and in land underneath or adjacent to such bridge and its 
approaches.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    The Act of April 12, 1941 (55 Stat. 140, chapter 71) is repealed 
effective on the date that the White County Bridge Commission completes 
the conveyance described in section 2.
                                 <all>
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00368-CR 

No. 07-22-00369-CR 

 

PABLO OLIVAREZ, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 287th District Court 

Bailey County, Texas 

Trial Court Nos. 3178 & 3268, Honorable Gordon H. Green, Presiding 

May 2, 2023 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Pablo Olivarez, appeals two convictions for assault on a peace officer1

and concurrent sentences of twelve and eighteen years of confinement. Appellant’s brief

was originally due March 3, 2023, but was not filed. We subsequently granted Appellant’s 

counsel two extensions to file a brief. By letter of April 5, 2023, we admonished 

Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a brief by April 17 could result in the appeals being

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b-2).
2

abated and the causes remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. To date, 

Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this Court.

We, therefore, abate the appeals and remand the causes to the trial court for 

further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court 

shall determine the following:

(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeals;

(2) whether Appellant is indigent;

(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;

(4) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeals;

(5) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and

(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeals, the date the Court may expect 

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by June 1, 2023. If 

it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeals, is indigent, and has 

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel; 

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly 

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before May16, 2023, he is directed to 

immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not

be required to take any further action.
3

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, IlanGanot, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solid Biosciences Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 
Date: March 29, 2018  By: /s/ Ilan Ganot   Ilan Ganot   
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**
PREPARED BY (Typed Name)

SECURITY FORCE RADIO LOG

HOURS

FROM TO

DATE

INSTRUCTIONS:

Double space between each entry.

TIME UNIT TO UNIT FROM

NAME OF ORGANIZATION

MESSAGE

SIGNATURE OF SHIFT SUPERVISOR

DLA FORM 1621, MAY 82 (EG) EDITION OF SEP 79 MAY BE USED UNTIL EXHAUSTED. PDF (DLA) PAGE OF PAGES

TYPED NAME & GRADE OF SHIFT SUPERVISOR
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3304 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3304

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
 To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
 means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of 
reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National Guard 
who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to perform a 
          homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reservists Debt 
Relief Extension Act of 2019''.
SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF AMENDMENT.
    Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief Act 
of 2008 (Public Law 110-438; 122 Stat. 5000) is amended by striking 
``11-year'' and inserting ``15-year''.
SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.
    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 10-1032.

#### Steve Magner, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas J. Gallagher, et al.

565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 548,

181 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8002.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of International Municipal Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 619 F.3d 823.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-276-000]


Nautilus Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, Nautilus Pipeline Company, LLC 
(Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 216, with an effective date of 
August 1, 1998.
    Nautilus states that the filing is being made in compliance with 
Order No. 587-G issued by the Commission in Docket No. RM96-1-007. 
Nautilus states the purpose of this filing is to incorporate Version 
1.2 of the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) standards into its 
tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18170 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Is it FMS, APO/FPO or 

OCONUS Awardee with 

I/A Origin?

Phase Supplier Process Flow for FDT Contracts (FOB Origin, Inspection/Acceptance at Destination – CONUS ONLY!)

FOB

(Block 8 & Section B)

FDT 

(Section B)

Contract Administration Transportation Administration Delivery 

Supplier 

registration 

required.

DLA Admin

Access

VSM 

DLA or DCMA 

assigned Carrier

picks up.

Delivery to destination 

contracted DODAAC

YES

Contains FDT Notice 

and Clauses.

NO

Origin

DCMA Admin 

YES

DCMA 

SIR

Obtain 

Shipping 

Instructions 

from SIR

Delivery to destination

contracted DODAAC

NNOO

DDooeessnnoottccoonnttaai

innFFDDTT 

NNootti

icceeaannddCCllaauusseess..

Non-FDT Program with 

FOB Origin. Supplier

ships and bills DLA, or

utilizes VSM for 

shipping/obtain MSL.

Delivery to destination

contracted DODAAC

Supplier Notified of 

scheduled shipment

via Email or EDI
Phase Supplier Process Flow for Non-FDT Contracts (FOB Destination, Inspection/Acceptance at Destination)

FOB

(Block 8 & Section B)

FDT 

(Section B)

Contract

Administration

Transportation Administration Delivery 

Access VSM to 

obtain MSL.

Destination NO DLA Admin

Not FDT. Supplier

scheduled delivery. Delivery made by CDD
@6RUSHWELLUAN

ENGINEERED MATERIALS
MATERIAL CERTIFICATION
Customer: Date: March,
SLSR. S.0.#: EMA-202
Room 5207, Attn: P.O.#: GS8G83- S- 809
i8th § F Streets, N. MO 29448 Specification: P
Material Description:
i Lot sed Block,
i Gross weig
i Net weight
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: (WT. %)
3058 | 3058 FT g
ELEMENT Top Bot. DIR. Aad kisi Ber Wid. pe
re 88.3
Bea | 2? Long. 43. «8h
Fe 58 Long. : 287
c 258
AL 2 ‘rans 84
Mg 82 7 3
Si +82
§ =.94
ul ~ 292
Nit =. 0 68
ral ~. 04 88
Min a 64
cu =f = 4 +64
rl = it oe
i iy
i 7 : %
DENSITY “cggdées Theoretical AVG GRAIN SIZE: (Wicrons)
1 | B89, 7%
| to TA] RADIOGRAPHIC INSP. PER PENETRANT INSP. PER
{ Pillva-k MIL
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
BATCH
No. Ulrrasery
OTHER
ELEM.EA.
OTHERS
TOTA
This is to certify that the above material satisfies the requirements of Spacification See above
Drawing. Purchase Order_s@8 2b0V@ and was removed rom Pressing No. 3085
ce: BRUSH WELLMAN INC.
Shipping (3) Sales (1) File (1) QUALITY CONTROL