alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Addition to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received a proposal to add to the 
Procurement List a commodity to be furnished by nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: August 27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Gateway 3, Suite 310, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-4302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible 
impact of the proposed action.
    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the commodity listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodity to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodity to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodity proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List. Comments on this certification are invited. 
Commenters should identify the statement(s) underlying the 
certification on which they are providing additional information.
    The following commodity has been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agency listed: Compact 
Disc, Recordable, (Requirements for U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, 
Colorado), NPA: North Central Sight Services, Willamsport, 
Pennsylvania.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-20160 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
No. 11-5133.

#### Paul Santivanez, Petitioner v. D. B. Drew, Warden.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 272,

181 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5435.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 833.
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.50. APPENDIX 8.50**

**RETURN OF DISCREPANT FOREIGN MILITARY SALES MATERIEL**

AP3.50-2

2

APPENDIX 3.50

AP8.50-1

APPENDIX 8.50
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA97-572-000]


Easton Utilities Commission; Notice of Filing

January 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 11, 1997, the Easton Utilities Commission 
on behalf of the Town of Easton, Maryland (Easton) filed a request for 
waiver of the standards of conduct and functional separation 
requirements adopted by the Commission in Order No. 889. Easton also 
seeks a declaration by the Commission that Easton's willingness to 
provide information concerning its transmission system for inclusion in 
data provided to the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM). 
Interconnection for posting of PJM's Oasis Shall be deemed to satisfy 
any requirements applicable to Easton to establish an OASIS.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 4, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1980 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2003
No. 11-6511.

#### Richard D. Bassett, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,

181 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7941.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21258 Conference Calendar

ERIC CANTRELL HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CV-3486

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * ERIC CANTRELL HOLMES (HOLMES), the alleged corporate entity of which Eric Cantrell Holmes (Holmes), Texas prisoner # 78102, is the authorized representative, appeals the district court’s dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. HOLMES also appeals the district court’s denial of a F ED . R. C IV . P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment.No. 02-21258 -2- HOLMES contends that the district court erred by failing to recognize it as a corporate entity separate and apart from Holmes. HOLMES asserts that Janie Cockrell, the Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, is violating its contractual rights by enforcing two judgments of conviction against Holmes. The appellant’s implied contention is that Holmes should be relieved of criminal liability under the terms of his contract with HOLMES. Even assuming that HOLMES exists as a corporate entity, we find that these arguments are frivolous. Neither Holmes nor any corporate entity could create an enforceable contract to avoid the criminal liability stemming from the two judgments of conviction against Holmes, the validity of which the appellant does not question. Cf. Palma v. Verex Assurance, Inc. , 79 F.3d 1453, 1462-63 (5th Cir. 1996); In re T.M. , 33 S.W.3d 341, 347 (Tex. App. 2000).
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 April 19, 2007
    /s/ E. Bonnie SchaeferE. Bonnie Schaefer 
Co-Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-6207.

#### Joseph Nestor Michel, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 956, 132 S. Ct. 434,

181 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7185.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 838.
II 

Calendar No. 611 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3361 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reliable Investment 

5 in Vital Energy Reauthorization Act’’ or the ‘‘RIVER 

6 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3361 PCS

1 SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND 

2 EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS. 

3 (a) HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES.— 

4 Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

5 15881) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘10’’ and in7 serting ‘‘22’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ‘‘section 

9 29(d)(2)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 45K(d)(2)(B)’’; 

10 (3) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘20’’ and in11 serting ‘‘32’’; and 

12 (4) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘each of the 

13 fiscal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each 

14 of fiscal years 2019 through 2036’’. 

15 (b) HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT.— 

16 Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

17 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fis18 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis19 cal years 2019 through 2036’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 611 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3361 

AN ACT 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauand for other purposes. hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, thorize hydroelectric production incentives and 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2008 |  | /s/ James Andrejko                                                 
|                      |  | James Andrejko                                                     
|                      |  | Vice President, Corporate Controller & Principal
Accounting Officer
No. 11-5244.

#### Eliza Shubaralyan and Gevork Kartashyan, Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 286,

181 L. Ed. 2d 172,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5523.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 685.
February 5, 2016

Mr. Steven Dooley

Vertical Lift Division

Boeing Military Aircraft

Mail Stop P01-05

PO Box 16858

Philadelphia , PA 19142-0858Zip Code

Dear Mr. Dooley:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We have received your January 12, 2016, petition on behalf of Boeing-Cargo Helicopter 

Sustainment (Boeing) for an exemption from § 21.9 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow Boeing to produce new replacement parts 

for installation on CH-47D Chinook helicopters certificated under § 21.25(a)(2) and operated 

as restricted category civil helicopters, without meeting the requirements of § 21.9 (a)(1) and 

(2).

We have added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2016-0833) and we are 

processing it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We Will Process the Petition

A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

§ 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. Therefore, we will publish 

the petition in the Federal Register so that the public may comment on it.

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4713.
2

Sincerely,

/s/

Alphonso Pendergrass II

Transportation Industry Analyst

Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3170

 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any crib bumper, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2019

   Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, and Mr. Rush) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any crib bumper, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Cribs Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF CRIB BUMPERS.

    (a) Prohibition on the Sale of Crib Bumpers.--Beginning on the date 
that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, it shall be 
unlawful for any person to manufacture for sale, offer for sale, 
distribute in commerce, or import into the United States any crib 
bumper.
    (b) Treatment of Violation.--A violation of subsection (a) shall be 
treated as a violation of section 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1)).
    (c) Crib Bumper Defined.--In this section, the term ``crib 
bumper''--
            (1) means any material that is intended to cover the sides 
        of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts 
        against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete 
        access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib 
        occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped in any 
        opening; and
            (2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and 
        unsupported vinyl bumper guard, a mesh crib liner, and vertical 
        crib slat covers.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   JO-ANN STORES, INC.
                                            RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                                            FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                               ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                FEBRUARY 1,     JANUARY 31,    JANUARY 30,     JANUARY 29,    FEBRUARY 3,
                                                    1997           1998            1999           2000           2001
                                               --------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>           <C>              <C>             <C>
Earnings:
   Income (loss) before income taxes            $   39.4        $   50.8      $    22.0        $   41.2        $ (11.4)
   Interest Expense                                 10.6             5.9           12.5            26.2           29.0
   Portion of occupancy expense
   deemed representative of interest(1)             22.3            23.5           30.9            34.4           37.0
                                               --------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Total Earnings                                  $   72.3        $   80.2       $   65.4         $ 101.8       $   54.6
                                               =============== ============== =============== ============== ==============

Fixed Charges:
   Interest Expense                             $   10.6       $     5.9       $   12.5        $   26.2       $   29.0
   Portion of occupancy expense
   deemed representative of interest (1)            22.3            23.5           30.9            34.4           37.0
                                               --------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Total Fixed Charges                             $   32.9        $   29.4       $   43.4        $   60.6      $    66.0
                                               =============== ============== =============== ============== ==============

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                   2.2x            2.7x           1.5x            1.7x           0.8x
                                               =============== ============== =============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>

(1) Represents 33% of fixed rental charges.


                                       94
No. 11-6069.

#### Helen Mansor-Hopkinson, Petitioner v. La Maison Management, LLC, et al.

565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 508,

181 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7846.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.