alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-030-08-1010-00-1784]


Southwest Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior

ACTION: Notice; Resource Advisory Council Meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 USC), 
notice is hereby given that the Southwest Resource Advisory Council 
(Southwest RAC) will meet in Gunnison, Colorado.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, August 13, 1998.

ADDRESSES: For additional information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM), Montrose District Office, 2465 South Townsend 
Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401; telephone 970-240-5335; TDD 970-240-
5366; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1c5c0f020b160f002e0d01400c020340090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="067434676a637e676846656928646a6b28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The August 13, 1998, meeting will begin at 
9:00 a.m. in the Aspinall-Wilson Center, South Room, 909 Escalante 
Drive, Gunnison, Colorado. The agenda will include discussions on the 
Montrose District's Fiscal Year 1999 Annual Work Plan priorities and 
updates on implementation of the Gunnison Sage Grouse Plan, the 
recreation guidelines, and on-going exchange efforts in the Montrose 
District. Time will be provided for public comments at 9:30 a.m.
    All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written 
statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. If 
necessary, a per-person time limit may be established by the Montrose 
District Manager.
    Summary minutes for Council meetings are maintained in the Montrose 
District Office and on the World Wide Web at <a href="http://www.co.blm.gov/mdo/
mdo__sw__rac.htm">http://www.co.blm.gov/mdo/
mdo__sw__rac.htm</a> and are available for public inspection and 
reproduction within thirty (30) days following each meeting.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
Roger Alexander,
Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. 98-19776 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-6672.

#### John Michael Lerma, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 994, 132 S. Ct. 540,

181 L. Ed. 2d 378,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7687.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 673.
No. 11-171.

#### Jacqueline Osmolski and Steven Osmolski, Jr., Petitioners v. New Jersey.

565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 413,

181 L. Ed. 2d 259,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7264,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
66
                                                                EXHIBIT 21


The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of the registrant as of
March 19, 1998. Each such subsidiary does business under its corporate name.




                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                    Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                          Incorporation

EID Corporation                                     Liberia
Ethyl Asia Pacific Company                          Virginia
Ethyl Brasil Aditivos S.A.                          Brazil
Ethyl Canada Inc.                                   Province of Ontario, Canada
Ethyl Europe S.A.                                   Belgium
Ethyl Foreign Sales Corporation                     U.S. Virgin Islands
Ethyl Interamerica Corporation                      Delaware
Ethyl Japan Corporation                             Japan
Ethyl Korea Limited                                 Korea
Ethyl Mineraloel-Additive GmbH                      Germany
Ethyl Petroleum Additives, Inc.                     Delaware
Ethyl Petroleum Additives Limited                   United Kingdom
Ethyl Shipping Company Limited                      United Kingdom
No. 11-5435.

#### David Tisdale, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 311,

181 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5790.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 204.
No. 11-6094.

#### Christopher J. Hunter, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 937, 132 S. Ct. 390,

181 L. Ed. 2d 245,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6411.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 372.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,281
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,185
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,599)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,599)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,599)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
#### R. C. Ricker, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Gulf Fertilizer Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 2, 1926.

*PC. S. Glazier,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hilton 8. Hampton,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in.the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-5962.

#### Donald Joe Jelani, Petitioner v. Greg Province, Warden.

565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 503,

181 L. Ed. 2d 354,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7845,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 774.
Support through Tech & Info and 

Miscellaneous Equipment

 Below outlines the process for part number requirements not supported by 

a National Stock Number (NSN) item.

 To begin the process, customer is required to provide a valid vendor quote 

for the item(s) requested for procurement to QCLCDMIPRSPT@dla.mil. The 

valid vendor quote must include exact manufacturer(s), part number(s), 

quantity requested and dollar amount. This information will be reviewed 

by DLA Troop Support, Construction and Equipment (C&E) contracting to 

determine whether or not the requested item(s) are within scope of the 

program. The determination is usually made within 2-3 business days.

 If the item(s) are not within scope, you will be notified accordingly. If your 

request can be supported by one of DLA's other programs, it will be 

forwarded to the proper POC.

 If the item(s) are determined to be within scope of the program, you will 

receive an e-mail requesting that you submit a MIPR form 448 to 

QCLCDMIPRSPT@dla.mil. The form must include: your valid DODAAC, 

shipping address, shipping POC and the POC phone number.

Along with the form 448, you also must include: the valid vendor quote for 

the items.

***The total MIPR price should be the vendor's quoted price, plus 

shipping cost (if any) plus DLA's 5.4% cost recovery rate.

 Once DLA receives your MIPR, it will be reviewed by both C&E Customer 

Operations and DLA Troop Support, Finance for acceptance. 

A DD448-2 MIPR acceptance is typically processed and provided back to the 

customer within 2-3 business days.

*Note: If it is determined that the MIPR total is incorrect, it will be returned 

to the customer for correction prior to acceptance.
 Once the MIPR is accepted, the C&E team will create a sales order and PR 

which will be sent to the C&E contracting team for procurement action. (On 

average, dependent on volume of requests, it takes approximately one 

week for the order/PR to be created.)

 Administrative lead time is approximately 4-8 weeks plus delivery for 

requirements under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Procurements 

through these programs are traditional procurements with no vendor 

assistance/no Prime Vendor contract in place.

 Please contact QCLCDMIPRSPT@dla.mil for any inquiries
No. 11-6554.

#### David Derringer, Petitioner v. Frances Elaine Baxter, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 591,

181 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8139,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
No. 11-5340.

#### Oussama Sahibi, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 299,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5600.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A0 94 8 . ANTI ONETTE EVANS v . I H4 PROPERTY GEORGI A L. P.

Th i s cas e beg an as a d i s p o s s es s o ry act io n i n m ag i s t r at e co u rt

. Aft er t h e

m ag i s t rat e co u rt en t ered j ud gm en t i n fav o r o f IH4 Pro p ert y Geo rg i a, L. P., An t i o n et t e Ev an s fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal t o th i s Co u rt

. Becau s e a l i t i g an t h as n o ri gh t t o ap peal a m ag i st rat e ru l i ng t o t h i s Co u rt , we tran s ferred th e m at t er to Gwi n n et t Co u nt y St at e Co u rt

. See 1 9 8 3 G a. Co n s t

. , Art

. 6
, Sec. 1
, Para. 8

. Th e St at e Co u rt en t ered an o rd er g ran t i n g a wri t o f po s ses s i o n , an d Ev an s fi l e d t hi s d i rect
ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

. Becau s e t he o rd er at i s s u e d i s p o s es o f a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt d eci s i o n , Ev an s was req ui red t o fo l l o w t h e d i scret i o nary ap p eal p ro ced u res t o o b t ai n

rev i ew befo re th is Co u rt

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1 ); S t r a c h a n v. Mer i t o r Mo r t g a g e Co r p

. Ea s t , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 1 9) (1 9 9 5 ). Ev an s ’ s fai l u re t o d o

s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s di ct i o n o v er t h i s ap peal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/12/2015 February 12, 2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1852

SYED M. A. HASAN,

Petitioner,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review

Board. (02-121; 02-ERA-18-ALJ)

Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Syed M. A. Hasan, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor

of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associate Solicitor Fair Labor

Standards, Paul L. Frieden, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Joan

Brenner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Syed M. A. Hasan, a pro se petitioner, requests review under

42 U.S.C. § 5851(c)(1) (1995) of the Energy Reorganization Act of

a final order issued by the Administrative Review Board of the

United States Department of Labor (the “Board”), affirming the

Recommended Decision and Order of the administrative law judge and

dismissing Hasan’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the Board. Hasan v. United States Dep’t of Labor, Nos. 02-121, 02-

ERA-18-ALJ (U.S.D.O.L. June 25, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes ofsection 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11M26.

#### Charles Edward Moore, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 443,

181 L. Ed. 2d 252,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7443.

October 11, 2011.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner granted.

*253Same case below, 51 Cal. 4th 1104, 127 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2, 253 P.3d 1153.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19646]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (98-098]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATE: July 23, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy M. Miller, Patent Counsel, Goddard 
Space Flight Center, Mail Code 750.2, Greenbelt, MD 20771; telephone 
301-286-7351.
    NASA Case No. GSC 13,915-1: Diode Laser Spectrometer Using Fiber 
Optic Granting Feedback;
    NASA Case No. GSC 13,880-1: Position Finding Magnetometer For Space 
Application;
    NASA Case No. GSC 13,817-2: Computer Implemented Empirical Mode 
Decomposition Method Apparatus and Article of Manufacture Utilizing 
Curvature Extrema;
    NASA Case No. GSC 13,728-1: A Low Cost, Balloon Launched Remotely 
Piloted Vehicle For Meteorological Research.
    NASA Case No. GSC 13,552-2: Pre-Coding Method and Apparatus For 
Multiple Source or Time-Shifted Single Source Data and Corresponding 
Inverse Post-Decoding Method And Apparatus.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-19646 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
No. 11-6340.

#### Matthew Skamfer, Petitioner v. William Pollard, Warden.

565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 523,

181 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7917.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-1104.

#### Margaret Minneci, et al., Petitioners v. Richard Lee Pollard, et al.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 445,

181 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7419.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
No. 11-6279.

#### Linart Randolph, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 520,

181 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7881,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 227.
NO. 07-01-0487 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L C JULY 10, 2002

______________________________ IN RE: ALAN SCOTT GORE

_________________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Pending before t he Cour tis the Petition for W rit of Mandam us filed by Relator Alan Scott Gore. Relator alleges that respondent, theHonorable David Gleason, Judge of the 4 7 th District Court of Potter County, has failed to rule on relator’s Motion to R eview th e Trial/Appe llate Reco rd on a Tem porary Loan Basis w hich is pending in cause number 37,830-A in the 47 th District Court. Byits response to the P etition for W rit of Mandam us, the State u rges that respondent

has signed an order denying relator’s m otion. The Stat e has a ttached a certified copy of an order signed by respondent which denies relator’s m otion. W e deny relator’s Petition as m oot. Phil Johnson2

Do not publish. Justice
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.47-1 APPENDIX 8.47

AP8.47. APPENDIX 8.47

SUPPLY STATUS

(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)

FIELD LEGEND

TYPE STATUS

ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

(MANUAL)

BLOCK NO.

(MECHANICAL)

RECORD

POSITION(S)

Send To A Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address corresponding 

to the routing identifier code (RIC).

Status is From B Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address of the reporting 

activity.

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC FTL.

Routing Identifier

Code

4-6 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Media and Status 7 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Stock Number 8-22 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Quantity 25-29 a. Enter quantity to be shipped.

b. For ammunition and 

ammunition related items only 

(items in Federal supply group 

(FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

cassification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 

1427, 1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 

8140), enter an M in rp 29 to 

express in thousands any quantity 

exceeding 99,999. Example:

Express a quantity of 1,950,000 as 

1950M (1950 in rp 25-28 and an M

in rp 29).
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.47-2 APPENDIX 8.47

FIELD LEGEND

TYPE STATUS

ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

(MANUAL)

BLOCK NO.

(MECHANICAL)

RECORD

POSITION(S)

Document Number 30-43 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Suffix 44 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Signal 51 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Fund 52-53 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Routing Identifier

Code

54-56 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Estimated Shipping 

Date

57-59 Enter estimated date of shipment.

Priority 60-61 Enter data as contained in DIC

FTR.

Action Date 62-64 Enter ordinal day of document 

preparation.

Blank 65-80 Leave blank.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8  (No. 333-222783) of ADT Inc. of our report  dated March 15, 2018 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10‐K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Certified Public Accountants


Fort Lauderdale, Florida


March 15, 2018








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8  (No. 333-222783) of ADT Inc. of our report  dated March 31, 2016, except for the effects of disclosing loss per share information as discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is September 28, 2017, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Protection One, Inc., which appears in this Form 10‐K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Fort Lauderdale, Florida


March 15, 2018
<PAGE>

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
               ---------------------------------------------------


         We have issued our report dated April 18, 2001, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
of Environmental Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year ended February 23, 2001 and Part II of this form. We have also audited
Schedule II for each of the three years in the period ended February 23, 2001.
In our opinion, this schedule represents fairly, in all material respects, the
information required to be set forth therein. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of
Environmental Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries of Form S-8 (File No.
333-65469, effective October 8, 1998), Form S-8 (File No 2-92407, effective
August 14, 1984) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-42219, effective September 4,
1991).





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 23, 2001