alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3830 STANDARD 40.68 5.16 20.58

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 29, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature UNDERSHIRT & DRAWERS, FLAME RESISTANT, 

LIGHTWEIGHT COLD WEATHER

MC-PA-01 & 02-2015

SYSCOM

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3830
No. 11-5600.

#### Whitney Atkinson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 332,

181 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5930.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 420.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141766) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 14, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) March 30, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 30, 2012
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3696 STANDARD 40.78 5.43 19.35

Tolerance

1 3696A GREEN LIMIT 43.78 39.81 41.64 3.00 -0.97 0.86 2.16

2 3696B RED LIMIT 44.14 40.81 40.76 3.36 0.03 -0.02 1.76

3 3696C THIN LIMIT 46.50 40.30 41.86 5.72 -0.48 1.08 5.84

4 3696D BLUE LIMIT 41.07 40.03 39.09 0.29 -0.75 -1.69 1.10

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number OLIVE MOHAVE Piece/Roll Number 3696

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 5, 2019

Fabric Nomenclature LEATHER, CATTLEHIDE, FOR FOOTWEAR MIL-PRF-3122K

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
**EXHIBIT      32**

**SECTION      1350 **

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 20, 2008 | By:                                   | /s/                James MacKay |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                              | Chief                Executive Officer and |
|                              | Principle                Financial Officer |

----
(1) Adjusting Price $17.86 CWT

(2) Base Price $18.08 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.22)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0189)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0095)

Price change per quart ($0.0047)

Price change per pint ($0.0024)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0018)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0015)

Price change per half pint ($0.0012)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.02)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.01)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Apr. 7, 2019
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 23a0405n.06
Case No. 22

- 1252
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MARQUAN SHANEAL TORNES , Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
OPINION

B efore : KETHLEDGE, THAPAR, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges. THAPAR, Circuit Judge. In 2022, a federal district court sentenced Marquan Tornes for possessing a gun as a felon

. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

. It enhanced his sentence because Tornes had a prior “controlled substance offense” : a 2014 marijuana conviction in Michigan

. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(3). Tornes appeals, claiming the district court shouldn’t have enhanced his
sentence. We review that question de novo. United States v. Clark , 46 F.4th 404, 407 (6th Cir. 2022). Tornes’s enhancement turns on the reference point for defining “controlled substance” under the Sentencing Guidelines’ categorical approach. Tornes argues the correct point is the time of his federal sentencing

— here , 2022. If we use that time, his argument goes, the enhancement won’t apply.Case No. 22

- 1252 , United States v. Tornes

- 2

-

Th at argument immediately faces a problem: we rejected it just last year in Clark . There, we held that the proper reference point is the time of the predicate state conviction

—here, 2014. Id. at 408; see also United States v. Long , No. 22

- 6041, 2023 WL 5242509, at *1 (6th Cir. July 28, 2023). Because that’s the point the district court used, it correctly enhanced Tornes’s sentence. Tornes acknowledges that Clark forecloses his argument and merely seeks to preserve it for en banc review. He has. Alternatively, Tornes asks us to hold this case until the Supreme Court decides two similar

cases involving a provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”)

. See Jackson v. United
States , 143 S. Ct. 2457, 2457 (2023) ( mem .); Brown v. United States , 143 S. Ct. 2458, 2458 (2023) ( mem .). We decline th is invitation

. The ACCA and the Sentencing Guidelines are different enactments with different structures and purposes. That’s why “longstanding principles of statutory interpretation allow different results under the Guidelin es as opposed to under the ACCA.” United States v. Jackson , 55 F.4th 846, 856 n.7 (11th Cir. 2022) , cert. granted , 143 S. Ct. at 2457 ; United States v. Brown , 47 F.4th 147, 154 (3d Cir. 2022) (citing Dorsey v. United
States , 567 U.S. 260, 291 (2012) (Scalia, J., dissenting)) , cert. granted , 143 S. Ct. at 2458

. So even if we hold this case, it’s far from certain to make a difference

. See Ne. Ohio Coal. for the Homeless v. Husted , 831 F.3d 686, 720

– 21 (6th Cir. 2016) (intervening Supreme Court case must be “directly applicable” for panel to disregard binding precedent)

. We don’t see the benefit in waiting for the Court to address different cases involving different provisions

. We affirm.
No. 11-6567.

#### Marshall Rountree, aka Mark Hawkins, Petitioner v. Karen Balicki, Administrator, South Woods State Prison, et al.

565 U.S. 992, 132 S. Ct. 533,

181 L. Ed. 2d 374,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7692.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 530.
# • RCRAREVISION CHECKLIST 29 Corrections to Listing ofCommercial Chemical Products and Appendix VIII Constituents 51 FR 28296-28310

August 6, 1986 (Non-HSWA Cluster III)
Note: OnApril 22, 1988 (Revision Checklist 46) extensive technical corrections were made to the lists addressedby this checklistbecause there were so many spelling and formatting errors found in these lists. Consequently, States mayelect to revise their rules in accordance with Revision Checklist 46 rather than this checklistwhen amending their code. STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION EQUIVALENT MORE BROADSTRIN- ER IN GENT SCOPE



# • PART 261 - IDENTIFICATIONAND LISTINGOFHAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES, CONTAINER RESIDUES, AND SPILLRESIDUES THEREOF WAC 173-303 correct specific listings 261,33(e) -9903 X 

### t add chemical abstract numbers 261.33(e) -9903 X correct specific listings 261,33(f) -9903 X 

### t add chemical abstract numbers 261.33(f) -9903 X APPENDIXVIII TO PART 261
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS correct specific listings Appendix VIII 

### t add chemical abstract numbers Appendix VIII WAC 173-303 -9905 -9905 X NUMBERS NOTADDED



# • August 6, 1986 - Page 1 of 1
No. 10-10377.

#### Wayne Miranda, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 548,

181 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7970.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 458 Mass. 100, 934 N.E.2d 222.
(1) Adjusting Price $25.40 CWT

(2) Base Price $25.30 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.10

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0086

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0043

Price change per quart $0.0021

Price change per pint $0.0011

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0008

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0007

Price change per half pint $0.0005

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Sept. 7, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. John L. Conner, 
Jr., et al., Civil Action No. B-C-97-85 (E.D. Ark.), was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 
on December 19, 1997.
    The proposed consent decree would resolve the United States' 
allegations in the above-referenced enforcement action that Defendants 
have violated Sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1311 and 1344, by unlawfully discharging dredged or fill material into 
approximately 70 acres of waters of the United States at twelve 
different sites in Jackson, Woodruff and Lawrence Counties.
    The proposed consent decree would require Defendants: (1) To pay a 
$400,000 civil penalty; (2) to restore the three largest violation 
sites, which total approximately 50 acres; (30) to create approximately 
85 acres of wetlands; and (4) to preserve 100 acres of forested land, 
95 of which are currently wetlands. The decree would also permanently 
enjoin Defendants from discharging dredged or fill materials into 
waters of the United States without an applicable permit.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
the proposed consent decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Attention: Wendy L. Blake, Environmental 
Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, D.C. 20026-3986, and 
should refer to United States v. Conner et al., DJ Reference No. 90-5-
1-4-385.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at either the Clerk's 
Office, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, 
Room 402, 600 West Capitol Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, or at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 
20005. Requests for a copy of the consent decree may be mailed to the 
Consent Decree Library at the above address and must include a check in 
the amount of $20.25.
Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 98-1994 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
CURETB PROGRAM

Who We Are

The CureTB program works to prevent the spread 

of tuberculosis (TB) among people who cross 

international borders. To reduce disease transmission 

and the emergence of drug-resistant TB, CureTB 

works to connect people with 

TB to healthcare services as 

they move between the United 

States and other countries. 

CureTB staff help patients be 

successful in understanding and 

completing their TB treatment.

What We Do

CureTB accomplishes its community-centered goal of 

reducing the spread of TB by:

• Linking patients to care outside the United States.

• Collecting and providing high-quality clinical 

information to healthcare providers.

• Educating patients and motivating them for 

continued adherence.

• Promoting integrated care by coordinating with US 

and global partners.

• Determining treatment outcomes.

Where We Work

CureTB works to connect people to TB services in 

countries all over the world. In 2017-2018, CureTB 

helped link patients to care in over 50 countries around 

the globe.

How We Work Together 

CureTB is a collaboration between CDC’s Division 

of Global Migration and Quarantine (DGMQ) and 

the County of San Diego’s Tuberculosis Control 

Program. CureTB collaborates with health authorities 

throughout the United States and around the world to 

link people with TB to care at their destinations. Health 

departments, healthcare providers, and others seeking 

help in linking patients to ongoing TB care in other 

countries can refer patients to CureTB.
CS295911A

CureTB Services and Processes

Active (Verified and Probable) TB Cases 

• CureTB refers patients with active (verified and probable) TB to the 

public health system at their destination in any country outside the 

United States.

• CureTB sends clinical information with the referral and follows up with the 

receiving program for treatment outcomes.

Clinical History Request 

• CureTB may be able to obtain information about your patient’s TB 

treatment history from providers in Mexico and Central America and other 

countries upon request.

Contact Notification

• CureTB notifies Mexican public health authorities for patients diagnosed 

with TB in the United States who have contacts in Mexico.

Source Case Finding 

• When a patient with active TB in the United States reports being 

exposed to a specific person with TB symptoms in Mexico, CureTB can 

alert Mexican public health authorities to help prevent further spread.

• CureTB prioritizes locating sources for children under 5 years of age 

with TB.

For more information about CureTB and access to CureTB forms:

www.cdc.gov/usmexicohealth/curetb
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 17, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 24, 1998 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)

    OMB Number: New.
    Form Number: ATF F 2931.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: Race and National Origin Identification.
    Description: This form on its own and when combined with other 
Bureau tracking forms will allow the Bureau to determine its applicant/
employee pool, and thereby, enhance its recruitment plan. It will also 
allow the Bureau to determine how its diversity/EEO efforts are 
progressing and to determine adverse impact on the employee selection 
process.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 3 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Robert N. Hogarth (202) 927-8930, Bureau of 
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20226.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19644 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39823-39827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 98-46]


36(B)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 98-46, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification and sensitivity of technology.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 3000-04-M

[[Page 39824]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24JY98.001



[[Page 39825]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24JY98.002



[[Page 39826]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24JY98.003



[[Page 39827]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24JY98.004



[FR Doc. 98-19788 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Application for a License to Export a Utilization Facility

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70 (b)(1) ``Public notice of receipt of an 
application'', please take notice that the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission has received the following application for an export 
license. Copies of the application are on file in the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission's Public Document Room located at 2120 L Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene may be 
filed within 30 days after publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register. Any request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene 
shall be served by the requestor or petitioner upon the applicant, the 
Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555; and the Executive Secretary, U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20520.
    In its review of the application for a license to export a 
utilization facility as defined in 10 CFR Part 110 and noticed herein, 
the Commission does not evaluate the health, safety or environmental 
effects in the recipient nation of the facility to be exported. The 
information concerning the application follows.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Name of applicant, date of                                                                                 
     application, date received,      Description of facility          End use           Country of destination 
           application No.                                                                                      
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combustion Engineering, Dec. 23,      Two (2) Nuclear          Commercial operation of  North Korea.            
 1997, Dec. 31, 1997, XR165.           utilization facilities   electricity.                                    
                                       1000MWE each.                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated this 21st day of January 1998 at Rockville, Maryland.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ronald D. Hauber,
Director, Division of Nonproliferation, Exports and Multilateral 
Relations, Office of International Programs.
[FR Doc. 98-2018 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
(1) Adjusting Price $25.12 CWT

(2) Base Price $25.89 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.77)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0662)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0331)

Price change per quart ($0.0166)

Price change per pint ($0.0083)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0062)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0052)

Price change per half pint ($0.0041)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.07)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.03)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.02)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: June 1, 2014