alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,715,000
<SECURITIES>                                20,247,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,834,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,791,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,199,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,815,000        
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,285,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,199,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,596,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,777,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   420,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,308,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,308,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Spine Pain Management, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
F. Donovan, M.D., the principal financial officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
      August 16,
      2010
                By:
                /s/
      William F. Donovan, M.D.William
      F. Donovan,
    M.D.Principal
      Financial
      Officer
No. 11-5716.

#### Earthley Taylor, Petitioner v. Sheltered Workshop for the Disabled, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 343,

181 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6901.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 367.
2020 WI 22



# S UPREME 

# C OURT OF 

# W ISCONSIN

C ASE N O .: 2018AP168

C OMPLETE T ITLE : In the matter of the temporary guardianship and

protective placement of J.J.H.:

Waukesha County,

Petitioner

- Respondent,

v.

J.J.H.,

Respondent

- Appellant

- Petitioner.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

O PINION F ILED : February 27, 2020

S UBMITTED ON B RIEFS :

O RAL A RGUMENT : February 10, 2020

S OURCE OF A PPEAL :

C OURT : Circuit

C OUNTY : Waukesha

J UDGE : Lloyd Carter

J USTICES :

DALLET, J. dissents.

N OT P ARTICIPATING :

ANN WALSH BRADLEY and HAGEDORN, JJ.

A TTORNEYS :

For the respondent

- appellant

- petitioner, there were briefs

filed by Colleen D. Ball , assistant state public defender. There

was an oral argument by Colleen D. Ball

.

For the petitioner

- respondent, there was a brief filed by

Robert J. Mueller , Wauskeha. There was an oral argument by Robert

J. Mueller

.

An amicus curiae briefs was filed on behalf of Association

for the Rights of Citizens with Handicaps, Disability Rights2

Wisconsin, National Disability Rights Network, and National

Association of the Deaf by Susan R. Tyndall and Habush, Habush &

Rottier, S.C.2020 WI 22

NOTICE

This opinion is subject to further

editing and modification. The final

version will appear in the bound

volume of the official reports.

No. 2018AP168

(L.C. No. 2017ME589)

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the matter of the temporary guardianship and

protective placement of J.J.H.:

Waukesha County,

Petitioner

- Respondent,

v.

J.J.H.,

Respondent

- Appellant

- Petitioner. 

## FILED

FEB 27, 2020

Sheila T. Reiff

C lerk of Supreme Court

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed as

improvidently granted.

¶ 1 PER CURIAM. J.J.H. petitioned for review of the

decision of the court of appeals, Waukesha Cty. v. J.J.H. , No.

2018AP168, unpublished order (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2019),

dismissing her appeal as moot. After reviewing the record and the

briefs of both p arties, and after hearing oral arguments, we

conclude this matter should be dismissed as improvidently granted.No. 2018AP168

2 ¶ 2 By the Court.

— The review of the decision of the court of

appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶ 3 ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J., withdrew from participation.

¶ 4 BRIAN HAGEDORN, J., did not participate.

¶ 5 REBECCA FRANK DALLET, J., dissents.No. 2018AP168

1
Duzy 2 

Vented Gas Log Set 

Bring home a Duzy 2 vented 

gas log set from Monessen,

you’ll get more than just a 

reliable heat source. This 4

piece log set features attractive, 

ceramic-fiber design and is 

compatible with our Natural

FlameTM burners. Read More

Where to Buy 

Address, City, or Zip/Postal Code

OTHER GAS LOG 

SETS 

Mountain Cedar

Vent Free Gas Log Set 

Charred Hickory

Vent Free Gas Log Set 

Aged Hickory

Vent Free Gas Log Set 

Home Gas Log Sets Gas Duzy 2

Natural FlameTM Burners 

A great-looking gas flame — Choose either a manual or millivolt 

ignition burner and enjoy randomized, dancing flames that 

mimic the allure of a traditional wood fire. 

Ceramic Fiber Logs 

Better heat output — Duzy log sets are made of high quality 

ceramic fiber to better reflect heat, improving your room-heating

efficiency. 

Up to 65,000 BTUs 

Stay warm and cozy — This log set delivers a range of BTUs 

from 50,000 to 65,000, so you'll stay nice and warm while 

efficiently heating the room to help lower heating costs. 

Limited Lifetime Warranty 

AVAILABLE SIZES: 

24/18" 30" 

QUICK LOOK 

Venting 

Max BTU / H 

Cost to Operate 

GUIDES & LITERATURE 

Product Brochure 

Specs and Manuals

MODEL DETAILS ACCESSORIES

Special Offers Product Gallery Customer Care Keyword or Item Number

Duzy 2 Vented Gas Log Sets by Monessen Hearth Page 1 of 2

http://www.monessenhearth.com/family/Gas-Log-Sets/Vented/Duzy-2/ 11/11/2011
About Monessen User Guides & Manuals Customer Care

Copyright © 2011 MHSC, All Rights Reserved. 

Consumer Internet Sales Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Use Disclaimer

Duzy 2 Model Line-Up 

Unique features by model number 

Common features for this family 

Charred Timber

Vent Free Gas Log Set 

See All Gas Log Sets

Max BTU/H (Natural Gas) 50,000 50,000 N/A N/A

Max BTU/H (LP) N/A N/A 50,000 50,000

Cost to Operate $0.54 $0.54 $1.35 $1.35 

Fuel Type Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquid Propane Liquid Propane

Burner Type VDY24/18NMP VDY24/18NVP VDY24/18PMP VDY24/18PVP

Ignition System Manual Millivolt Manual Millivolt

Hearth Dimensions 26 (W) 

16 (H) 

13-1/2 (D) 

17(RW) 

26 (W) 

16 (H) 

13-1/2 (D) 

18(RW) 

26 (W) 

16 (H) 

13-1/2 (D) 

17(RW) 

26 (W) 

16 (H) 

13-1/2 (D) 

18(RW) 

Model Number VDY24/18D2A

Venting Vented

Certifications CSA Design

Spec Sheets 

& Manuals

Manual

A log set you can count on — We stand behind each and every 

log set we sell, and we back them with a lifetime warranty. 

Narrow Rear Width 

Fits in nicely — This vented gas log set features a shorter rear 

width, so it can fit into a wide range of different fireboxes. 

Compatible gas burners sold separately. See 

Accessories tab for details. 

* Based on cost/therm. According to the 

Federal Register Energy Conservation 

Program for Consumer Products. 

Vented 

50,000-65,000 

$0.54-$1.76*

(English)

24/18

30"

Duzy 2 Vented Gas Log Sets by Monessen Hearth Page 2 of 2

http://www.monessenhearth.com/family/Gas-Log-Sets/Vented/Duzy-2/ 11/11/2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30,
2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ David R. Asplund

David R. AsplundChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2008
No. 11-5591.

#### Jason Collura, Petitioner v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 946, 132 S. Ct. 404,

181 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7453.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 256.
No. 11-5455.

#### Marq L. White, Petitioner v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center.

565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 314,

181 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5894.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Jeronimo Folgueira, certify that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 25, 2018 |  | By: | /s/ Jeronimo Folgueira 
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|                     |  |     | Jeronimo Folgueira     
|                     |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.68



 Exhibit 10.68 
  





 
 One Maritime Plaza 
 300
Clay Street 
 San Francisco, CA 94111 
 June 3, 2013

 Dear Giannella: 
 This letter is to confirm
our understanding with respect to the Retention Bonuses as set forth (and defined) in your employment offer letter, dated June 3, 2013 (“Offer Letter”). In the event that your title has not been changed, other than with your written
consent, to President, Pet Business Unit, prior to January 1, 2014, Retention Bonus 3 shall become fully vested and not subject to repayment as otherwise provided in the Offer Letter. Further, in the event that your title has not been changed,
other than with your written consent, to President, Pet Business Unit, prior to April 30, 2014, (i) Retention Bonuses 1 and 2 shall become fully vested and not subject to repayment as otherwise provided in the Offer Letter and (ii) if
you elect to voluntarily resign your employment during the period between April 30, 2014 and May 31, 2014, your resignation will be treated for all purposes as a Tier II level Termination of Employment without Cause under the Del Monte
Corporation Executive Severance Plan as such plan is in effect on your start date. In addition, in the event that Del Monte closes a full divestiture of the Consumer Business Unit prior to January 1, 2014, and your title is not changed
immediately thereafter, other than with your written consent, to President, Pet Business, the Retention Bonuses will become fully vested and not subject to repayment as otherwise provided in the Offer Letter. 

Sincerely, 
 David J. West 

President and Chief Executive Officer 
 Signed: /s/ David J.
West                     
 Dated: 
                                         
      
 Accepted and agreed: 

/s/ Giannella
Alvarez                             

Giannella Alvarez 

Date:                         
                        
  

	cc:	 A. Husain 



D. Windham
No. 11-6536.

#### Kevin Nevoyle Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 991, 132 S. Ct. 530,

181 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7661.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 252.
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: August 7, 2014 517730

________________________________ In the Matter of DANIEL FELDER, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 9, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Daniel Felder, Dannemora, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.), entered October 16, 2013 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in four misbehavior reports with violating numerous prison disciplinary rules as a result of him conspiring to assault a prison employee and becoming violent when several correction officers attempted to restrain him. Following a disciplinary hearing on all four reports, petitioner was found guilty of assaulting staff (four counts), violent conduct (four counts), creating a disturbance (two counts), refusing a direct order, refusing a search, and being out of place. The-2- 517730

determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and petitioner now appeals. We affirm. Petitioner questions the Hearing Officer's failure to provide photographs and medical reports of the injured correction officers after the officers had testified, but any error in that regard was harmless given that the officers testified to their injuries and the record contained overwhelming evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Martin v Fischer, 98 AD3d 774, 775 [2012]; Matter of Brown v Goord, 300 AD2d 777, 777 [2002]). Petitioner also asserts that he was deprived of the opportunity to review a to/from memorandum purportedly authored by one of the officers but, inasmuch as the record reveals that said document does not exist, the Hearing Officer cannot be faulted for failing to provide it (see Matter of Martin v Fischer, 109 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2013]). Petitioner's remaining arguments, to the extent they are properly preserved for our review, have been examined and found to lack merit. Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
----

Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

                I, George Kazantzis, certify that:

                1.  I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Envirokare Tech, Inc.;

                2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

                3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

                4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                     a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                     c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

                5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                     a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

                  6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 22nd, 2005

By: /s/ George Kazantzis  ___________________________  Name:  George Kazantzis  Title:   Acting President (Principal Financial Officer
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 22 - 00368 - CR No. 07 - 22 - 0036 9 - CR PABLO OLIVAREZ , A

PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 287th District Court Bailey County, Texas Trial Court No s . 3178 & 3268 , Honorable Gordon H. Green , Presiding



### May 2 , 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant , Pabl o Olivarez , appeals two convictions for assault on a p eace officer 1 and concurrent sentences of twelve and eighteen years of confinement. Appellant ’ s brief
w as originally due March 3, 2023 , but was not filed . We subsequently granted Appellant’s counsel two extension s to file a brief

. By letter of April 5 , 2023 , we admo nished Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a brief by April 17 c ould result in the appea ls be ing

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 22.01( b
- 2).2

abated and the cause s remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. To date, Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further communic ation with this Court. We, therefore, abate th e appea ls and remand the cause s to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following: ( 1 ) whether A ppellant still desires to prosecute the appeal s ; ( 2 ) whether A ppellant is indigent; ( 3 ) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of A ppellant; ( 4 ) whether A ppellant ’ s counsel has abandoned the appeal s ; ( 5 ) whether A ppellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; ( 6 ) whether new counsel should be appointed; and ( 7 ) if appellant desires to continue the appeal s , the date the C ourt may expect A ppellant ’ s brief to be filed. The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by June 1 , 2023

. If it is determined that A ppellant desires to proceed with the appeal s , is indigent, and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before May 16 , 2023, he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.3

It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
September 9, 2021 DLA-SM-21-3198

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR August 2021

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during August 2021.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

1,000 $1.61M Profound Alloys

LLC,

Veritas Alloys & 

Metals

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST NO

SALES

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001

Lbs W NO

SALES

Zinc Amendment 001 Lbs

NO

SALES

Tin Amendment 001 MT 13 $458K *

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3689 STANDARD 13.53 -5.28 -0.16

Tolerance

1 3689A YELLOW LIMIT 14.49 -4.86 0.53 0.96 0.42 0.69 1.07

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number RIFLE GREEN 297 Piece/Roll Number 3689

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 21, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature BERET, MAN'S WOOL A-A-55184

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
**Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 17-1 Meeting (May 17, 2017)**

**Current as of November 1, 2017**

Supply PRC 17-1 Minutes: www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/Archives/supply**/**

Page **2** of **2**