alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 22-20078 Summary Calendar

Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez,

Petitioner—Appellant ,

versus
United States Immigration Department,

Respondent—Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CV-2537

Before Haynes, Engelhardt, and Oldham, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez, Texas pr isoner # 1745089, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the dismissal of his petition construed by the district court as aris ing under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court determined that Enriquez Sanc hez raised claims challenging his

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 9, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20078 Document: 00516424879 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2022No. 22-20078

2 removal proceedings and immigration deta iner and dismissed his petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Enriquez Sanchez does not address the district court’s reasons for dismissing the petition and certifying that his appeal was not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The failure by Enriquez Sanchez to
address the district court’ s basis for dismissing his petition “without even the slightest identification of any error in [the district court’s] legal analysis or its application to [his] su it . . ., is the same as if he had not appealed that judgment.” Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The instant appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, the motion to proceed IFP is DENIED , and the appeal is
DISMISSED

. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997);
5 th Cir. R. 42.2. To the extent Enriquez Sanchez’s motion contesting his immigration proceedings and criminal conviction ca n be construed as seeking mandamus relief, he fails to demonstrate that he has no other adequate means to obtain the requested relief and that he has a “clear and indisputable” right to the
writ. In re Willy , 831 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir. 1987) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). He likewise fails to demonstrate that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See Cooper v. Sheriff Lubbock Cnty.,
Tex. , 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1 991). As such, his motions are
DENIED. Case: 22-20078 Document: 00516424879 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2022
No. 11-5470.

#### Mohamed Aboutaleb, Petitioner v. Abla Elgammal.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 316,

181 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5811.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-6109.

#### Kenneth Junier, Petitioner v. Mark Conrad, et al.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 512,

181 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7746.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 79 Mass. App. 1113, 945 N.E.2d 438.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3374 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of 

small business loan data related to LGBTQ-owned businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2019 

Mr. ROUDA (for himself, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. 

HAALAND, and Mr. COX of California) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the 

collection of small business loan data related to LGBTQowned businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LGBTQ Business 

5 Equal Credit Enforcement and Investment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION. 

7 Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 1691c–2) is amended— 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3374 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘LGBTQ-owned,’’ after ‘‘mi2 nority-owned,’’ each place such term appears; 

3 (2) in subsection (e)(2)(G), by inserting ‘‘(in4 cluding sexual orientation and gender identity),’’ 

5 after ‘‘sex’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(7) LGBTQ-OWNED BUSINESS.—The term 

9 ‘LGBTQ-owned business’ means a business— 

10 ‘‘(A) more than 50 percent of the owner11 ship or control of which is held by 1 or more 

12 individuals self-identifying as lesbian, gay, bi13 sexual, transgender, or queer; and 

14 ‘‘(B) more than 50 percent of the net prof15 it or loss of which accrues to 1 or more individ16 uals self-identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, 

17 transgender, or queer.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 

DLA Land and Maritime 

Contact Us

Please enter your comment or question:

If you would like us to contact you, please provide contact information (optional):

Name:

Email Address:

Organization Name:

Phone Number:

Privacy Advisory: 

Comments are solicited in order for DLA Land and Maritime to assist you with specific issues, answer your questions, and improve procedures. The comments provided 

may also be used to identify recurring problems or Frequently Asked Questions. Personally identifying information is solicited only if a response is requested. The 

information provided will be shared only with the office best suited to respond to your question or comment.

 

Or, save a copy of the form and send via email to: dscc.bcc@dla.mil

Use the Submit button to send the form 

Topic: Small Business Office
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and****

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and****

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
The Nation’s Combat Logistics Support Agency E s t a b l i s h e d 1 9 6 1

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS

cFolders and 

Technical Data
Agenda

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 2

• What is cFolders?

• Access to Solicitation Technical Data

• cFolders Password Process

• Navigating cFolders

• DIBBS Online Help

• Points of Contact
What is cFolders?

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 3

• cFolders is DLA’s access to Technical Data

• Technical Data associated with open solicitations

• Staging area for Technical Data for other projects not 

associated with open solicitations
Access to cFolders

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 4

• There are multiple ways to access cFolders

– Access from link identified from DLA Internet Bid 

Board System (DIBBS) home page

• https://www.dibbs.bsm.dla.mil/

– Access through Request for Quote (RFQ) or Request 

for Proposal (RFP) in DIBBS

– Direct Login to cFolders

• https://pcf1x.bsm.dla.mil/cfolders/
DIBBS Home Page Link to 

cFolders

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 5
Searching for Active 

Procurements

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 6
DIBBS RFQ

Search Screen

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 7
DIBBS RFQ

Search Results

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 8
cFolders Password 

Requirements

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 9
Password Entry Screen

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 10
cFolders Home Page

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 11
Search by Solicitation Number

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 12
cFolders View of TDP

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 13
Drilling in

to TDP

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 14
Drilling in

to TDP

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 15
Drilling in to TDP

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 16
Drilling in to TDP

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 17
TDP Restrictions

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 18
License Agreements

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 19
Example License Agreement 

Form

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 20
Export Control

https://www.dla.mil/Logistics-Operations/Enhanced-Validation/

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 21
DIBBS Online Help

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 22
Document Viewers

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 23
Points of Contact

WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 24

● cFolders System Issues, Passwords and Resets

DISA Global Service Desk

1-844-347-2457

Press 5, then speak or enter D-L-A

● cFolders Admin Teams:

dscc.cddwgs@dla.mil

dscr.pdmddistribution@dla.mil

trpsptdrawings@dla.mil
No. 11-5503.

#### Mackie L. Shivers, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 321,

181 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5896.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 697.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTHONY G. BUZBEE AND THE 

BUZBEE LAW FIRM,

Appellants,

v.

ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. AND 

ROBERTO CANALES, M.D., P.A.,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00138-CV

Appeal from the

Court District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2020DCV0691)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees 

recover from Appellants and their sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Si hubiese una 

vacuna contra 

el cáncer, 

¿se la pondría 

a sus hijos?

La vacuna contra 

el VPH previene 

el cáncer.

Consulte a su médico 

sobre cómo vacunar 

a sus hijos e hijas de 

entre 11 y 12 años 

contra el VPH.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens

CS249586-Q

Distributed by:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-46954 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-64611 and 333-79165 on
Form S-8 of Covista Communications, Inc. (formerly Total-Tel USA
Communications, Inc.) of our report dated April 11, 2001, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covista Communications, Inc. for the year ended
January 31, 2001.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York

April 24, 2001
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00397-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.D.A., S.A.A., D.S.A., Children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013EM506191

Honorable Eric Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant, proceeding pro se, has filed a request for a copy of the appellate record for the 

purpose of preparing his brief. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court on May 

28, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(a). Thereafter, appellant filed an untimely affidavit of 

indigence in this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1). In our order issued July 2, 2014, we 

notified the trial court clerk, court reporter, and other parties of the opportunity to file a contest 

to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(d)(2), (e). No contest was filed. 

Therefore, the affidavit of indigence is deemed true and appellant is considered to be indigent. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f). The clerk’s record was filed on July 18, 2014, and the court reporter 

filed a CD of the audio transcript on August 21, 2014. Because appellant is indigent he is 

entitled to receive a free copy of the appellate record. Accordingly, the clerk of this Court is 

ORDERED to promptly provide appellant with a copy of the clerk’s record and a copy of the CD 

of the audio transcript.

 

The appellant’s brief is currently due on September 22, 2014. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 11-5820.

#### Confesor Vazquez Riquelme, Petitioner v. Oneida de Jesus, et al.

565 U.S. 965, 132 S. Ct. 457,

181 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7474.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE VALDEZ-MARTINEZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00193-CR

Appeal from the

171stDistrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D03097)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fifth motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until August 28, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Veronica Teresa Lerma, Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 28, 2018. If 

the brief is not filed, the Court will consider ordering the trial Court to conduct a hearing to 

determine why the Appellant’s brief has not been filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FJ1/FJ2/GJ1/GJ2 FORMAT**

**BILLING FOR BULK PETROLEUM**

132

	APPENDIX 3.17

1
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 53090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21184]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8860]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Atua: Sacred Gods From Polynesia''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Atua: Sacred Gods from Polynesia,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Saint Louis Art 
Museum, St. Louis, Missouri, from on or about October 12, 2014, until 
on or about January 4, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 28, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-21184 Filed 9-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting, CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, CFO

Dated: December 9, 2004
/  

 

7

8

9798:7:8

;7;8

<7<:<<<=<>878::<=>979:9<9=9>:7:::<:=:>;7;:;<;=;>

?

@

A

B @

C

D

?

EF

G

D

GH

@

I JJ K

:798 L 9=:79= L 9M:79M L 9>:79> L 9N:79N L :7:7:7 L :9:7:9 L :::7:: L :;

  O   P  O 


Q 


  TO    U  V   
 
[\[[ _ [b

c d e fg h difjf k fg hl gm

n oopqp ff

k r s t u



z si{sfi l g | si{d } l sg ~ sg } d }

c  c

   

c  c  rz n   u



           jjj t  h  t ms

  f |l g hl gmdg h sg e  l sg l g } l fisi } dfi }  sfs | }  fd }  sidg hh sgs } gffdi le fififg }}  fs ||l  l d e s l } l sgs | }  f c fg } fi | si  l fdf c sg } is e dg

h  fifg } l sg t
|    |                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Mary A. Winston |
|   | Mary A. Winston |
|   | Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
No. 11-5513.

#### Robert Rameses, Petitioner v. Scott Kernan, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 322,

181 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5817.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Did you know that some queso 

fresco can make you sick? 

Protect your family! 

Always buy queso fresco that 

is refrigerated and made with 

pasteurized milk. 

Always buy queso fresco in 

the store.
 

Also, buy queso fresco 

that has a label. 

Never buy queso 

fresco from the 

street! 

For more information go to: http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/specific-foods/listeria-and-food.html 

or call:
No. 11-5855.

#### Pamela Yvette Hoffler-Riddick, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 352,

181 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7057.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 651.
READ ADMIRAL JAMES E. MILLER

SC, U.S. NAVY (RET) 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of June 1995 

for his extraordinary leadership and support as Commander of DPSC’s Subsistence Directorate from 

1981 to 1983. Admiral Miller directed unprecedented improvements with all facets of the 

Subsistence mission. Demonstrating the epitome of total quality management and extraordinary 

leadership techniques, he was instrumental in establishing overseas storage facilities and customer 

service resources. He also developed the use of the growing regions in Europe. Through his astute 

management, he directed resolution of long-standing inventory problems, and created a highly 

efficient streamlined subsistence-support organization for deployed U.S. military forces. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/miller.htm 1/27/2016