alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19957]



[[Page 40111]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-665-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

July 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed in Docket 
No. CP98-665-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 and 
211 of the Commission's Regulations under the National Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205, 157.216, and 211) for authorization to remove an existing 6-
inch meter run formally used for receipt of gas from the Roggen 
Processing Plant and to replace it with a 2-inch meter tube to deliver 
gas to Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. (Duke) pursuant to CIG's 
Blanket Certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-21-000, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    CIG states that the 6-inch meter facility was originally installed 
to receive gas from the Roggen Processing Plant (closed in the summer 
of 1997) which provided pipeline quality gas for Duke's gathering 
system compressor station in Weld county, Colorado. CIG now proposes to 
remove the existing 6-inch meter tube and replace it with a 2-inch 
meter tube to be used to deliver gas for fuel gas at Duke's gathering 
system compressor station.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19957 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1,2017, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administratorand Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee , with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-KNOX (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 3.19 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director ofSpecial Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Special  Servicer during the period from July 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

3. A statement that aregistered public accounting firm that is a member of the American Institute ofCertificed Public Accountants has issued an attestation report on suchReporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of and for such period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen, Managing Director

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
≥95% (10 awardees)

75% - 94% (27 awardees)

50% - 74% (13 awardees)

25% - 49% (3 awardees)

<25% (1 awardee)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (1 awardee)

Percentage of adolescents aged 11 – 17 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2017

National Participation: 79% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2017 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 06170 STANDARD 16.85 -0.12 -1.26

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 30, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED SILK WEIGHT, STRETCH, 

FLAME RESISTENT

PD 4631-04-08

TYPE I

Shade Number BLACK 3241 Piece/Roll Number 06170
PD-04-06

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3346 STANDARD 16.65 -0.38 -1.66

Tolerance

1 3346-1 FULL LIMIT 16.79 0.04 -1.29 0.13 0.43 0.37 0.78

2 3346-2 RED LIMIT 16.51 0.09 -1.46 -0.14 0.47 0.19 0.71

3 3346-3 ORANGE LIMIT 16.66 -0.48 -1.57 0.01 -0.09 0.09 0.17

4 3346-4 YELLOWGREEN LIMIT 16.58 -0.12 -1.20 -0.08 0.27 0.46 0.72

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 16, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, TROPICAL, 75 % POLY/25% WOOL

Shade Number BLUE 3346 Piece/Roll Number 20178
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ERNESTO MARTELL,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00180-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. One

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 990D03958)

O R D E R

The above styled and numbered cause has been remanded to this Court with instructions 

from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas that we consider and reach a decision on the 

applicability of the State’s estoppel argument to Appellant’s case, but only after we first afford the 

parties an opportunity to fully brief the issue. It is therefore ordered that the State’s supplemental 

response brief on that limited issue shall be filed in this Court no later than July15, 2022, and 

Appellant’s supplemental reply brief shall be filed no later than August 14, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00427-CR, 04-19-00428-CR & 04-19-00429-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Raymond SOTO,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR9018, 2018CR9019, 2018CR9020

The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

By order dated October 28, 2019, we abated these appeals to the trial court to determine 

if appellate counsel should be appointed to represent appellee in these appeals. On November 

13, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law noting appellate counsel had been appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that 

these appeals are REINSTATED on the docket of this court. Appellee’s brief must be filed no 

later than thirty days from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-670-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

July 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 15, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), 200 North Third Street, Suite 300, 
Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, filed in Docket No. CP98-670-000 a 
request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for 
authorization to utilize an existing tap in Morton County, North Dakota 
to effectuate additional natural gas deliveries to an existing 
customer. Williston Basin makes such request under its blanket 
certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-487-000, et al. pursuant to 
Section 7 of the National Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Williston Basic states that it recently received a request from 
Montana-Dakota Utility Company (Montana-Dakota), a local distribution 
customer, for authorization to add additional end-use customers to an 
existing transmission line tap in Morton County, North Dakota. 
Williston Basin is proposing herein to utilize this existing tap to 
effectuate additional natural gas transportation deliveries to Montana-
Dakota for other than right-of-way grantor use. It is stated that 
Williston Basin plans to provide natural gas transportation deliveries 
to Montana-Dakota for ultimate use by the additional end-use customers 
under Rate Schedules FT-1 and/or IT-1.
    The estimated additional volume to be delivered is 110 dekatherms 
per year. It is averred that the proposed service will not have a 
significant effect on Williston Basin's peak day or annual 
requirements. Williston Basin indicates that its tariff does not 
prohibit the addition of new delivery points, and that the volumes 
proposed to be delivered are within the contractual entitlements of 
Montana-Dakota.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If not protest is filed within the time allowed thereof, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is tiled 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19960 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2438

SARAH RAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREENVILLE COUNTY, School District; BRENDA TURNER; SUSAN B. HILL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-2282-6-20AK) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sarah Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sarah Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order adoptinga magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to dismiss her employment action. Because Williams did not file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court did not err in adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her claim as barred by res judicata. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp. , 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Williams v. Greenville Co. , No. CA-99-2282-6-20AK (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3913 STANDARD 19.07 0.19 -0.38

Tolerance

1 3913A THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 20.79 0.14 -0.34 1.72 -0.05 0.04 1.47

2 3913B BLUE LIMIT 19.76 0.29 -0.65 0.69 0.10 -0.27 0.73

3 3913C GREEN LIMIT 21.85 0.18 -0.38 2.78 -0.01 0.00 2.36

4 3913D THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 24.36 0.02 -0.71 5.29 -0.17 -0.33 4.37

5 3913E THIN LIMIT 19.93 0.09 -0.31 0.86 -0.10 0.07 0.75

6 3913F FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT 19.22 0.29 0.38 0.15 0.10 0.76 1.15

7 3913G THIN GREEN 

LIMIT 22.93 -0.04 -0.31 3.86 -0.23 0.07 3.19

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number BLACK 557 Piece/Roll Number 3913

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 11, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature GLOVES, MEN'S AND WOMEN'S, LIGHT 

DUTY, UTILITY, LEATHER GL/PD 08-12C
SMALL BUSINESS/LABOR SURPLUS AREA

DETERMINATION 8 SECTION C - OTHER SUPPORT DATA

SECTION B - PREAWARD SUPPORT DATA 42

18 ABSTRACT OF BID/PROPOSAL SECTION D - CONTRACT

DLA FORM 678, MAR 85 (EG) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. PDF (DLA)

(X)

CONTRACT FILE CONTENT LIST CONTRACT (PIIN) NUMBER

SECTION A - PLANNING AND SOLICITATION SECTION B - PREAWARD SUPPORT DATA (Continued)

TAB

NO. DOCUMENT (X)IN FILE

TAB

NO. DOCUMENT IN FILE

1 PR/MIPR 26 GOVERNMENT FACILITIES USE APPROVAL

2 SPECIFICATION/DRAWING 27 PREAWARD SURVEY/WAIVER

3 ACQUISITION PLAN/AMENDMENTS 28 EEO CLEARANCE

4 JUSTIFICATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN

FULL & OPEN COMPETITION 29 BID/OFFER EVALUATION WORKSHEET, COMPUTER RUN

5 DETERMINATION AND FINDINGS 30

6 NON PERSONAL SERVICES DETERMINATION 31

7 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WAGE DETERMINATION 32

9 BUY AMERICAN ACT (Exception/Exemption) 33 NO BID/PROPOSAL AND CORRESPONDENCE

10 EXCEPTION TO APPROPRIATION ACT RESTRICTION 34 UNSUCCESSFUL BID/PROPOSAL

11 SOURCE LIST 35 MISTAKE IN BID/PROPOSAL

12 PRESOLICITATION NOTICE 36 DETERMINATION OF LATE BID/PROPOSAL

13 STATEMENT AS TO SYNOPSIS 37 CONTRACT ANNOUNCEMENT

14 SOLICITATION & AMENDMENTS 38 INDIVIDUAL CONTRACT ACTION REPORT QD 350)

15 39 LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW COMMENTS

16 40

17 41

19 PACKAGING/TRANSPORTATION/FREIGHT RATE DATA 43 AWARD/CONTRACT AND INCORPORATED

CORRESPONDENCE

20 COST/PRICING DATA 44 OTHER PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE

21 AUDIT REPORT/WAIVER/FlELD PRICING REPORT 45 MODIFICATIONS

22 PRICE/COST ANALYSIS 46

23 PRENEGOTIATION BRIEFING MEMORANDUM 47

24 PRICE NEGOTIATION/PRICE REASONABLENESS

MEMORANDUM 48

25 CERTIFICATE OF CURRENT COST OR PRICING DATA 49
Private Provider Participation 

in Registries, 2002

National average = 31%

0-33%

34-66%

67-100%

VT 0

NH 3

MA <1

RI 38

CT 100

NJ 2

DE 43

MD 9

DC 77

53 0

11

12 68

0

100

10

33

17

100

93

14

83

50

0

33 0

0

0

0

27

34

10

9

100

49

4

59

<1

1

5

0

<1

50

0

0 2

17

40

16

0

Source: Immunization Registry Annual Report, CY2002

*: % of provider sites reporting to the registry within the last six months of 2002
A-A-55198

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 09729 STANDARD 12.56 0.01 -1.48

Tolerance

1 09279-1 FULL LIMIT 0.12 -0.08 0.44 0.63

2 09279-2 ORANGE LIMIT 0.50 -0.07 0.41 0.75

3 09279-3 RED-ORANGE 

LIMIT 0.40 0.41 0.52 0.99

4 09279-4 THIN REDORANGE LIMIT 0.51 0.47 0.37 0.96

5 09279-5 YELLOWORANGE LIMIT 0.57 0.1 0.50 0.89

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT December 27, 2016

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, MELTON, WOOL

Shade Number BLUE 3346 Piece/Roll Number 09729
Navy Clothing & Textile

Deputy Commander, Navy Uniforms

Navy Exchange Service Command

CAPT(s) Terri Gabriel

17 Nov 2021

Unclassified
Navy Uniform and OCIE 

Organization
Projects in 

Development Projects in Execution

Navy C&T Projects

Improved PTU

I-Boot 5

2-Piece FR (2PC-FR) 

Shipboard Uniform

Navy Combat Uniform-FR 

replacement for the Enhanced 

FR Combat Ensemble

Shipboard Jacket

COTS Flotation Device 

for Maritime Armor 

System (MAS)

Enlisted Service 

Dress Uniform

Neckerchief 
Navy Points of Contact

OPNAV (Uniform Policy and Requirements) 

Mr. Rob Carroll, N13X Uniform Matters robert.b.carroll@navy.mil

NAVSUP/NEXCOM

CAPT(s) Terri Gabriel, Deputy Commander, Navy Uniform Programs Terri.Gabriel@nexweb.org 

Ms. Laurra Winters, Director, Navy Clothing & Textiles Research Facility laurra.c.winters.civ@mail.mil

Mr. Mark Stephens, Director, Uniform Product Management Group Mark.Stephens@nexweb.org

Mr. Paul Shields, Director, Uniform Program Management Office Paul.Shields@nexweb.org

Ms. Lindsay Vance Bean, Divisional Merchandise Manager, Uniforms Lindsay.VanceBean@nexweb.org

NAVSEA

Mr. Edward Gray, Technical Warrant Holder Body Armor edward.gray1@navy.mil

Mr. Hank Kuzma, (DC/PPE) Technical Warrant Holder henry.j.kuzma@navy.mil

Mr. David Gwaltney, Assistant Program Manager david.gwaltney@navy.mil

NAVAIR

Jennifer Milan, Strategic Co-Lead/SOA IPTL Jennifer.milan@navy.mil

Ms. Tara Capecci, Lead Textile Engineer tara.capecci@navy.mil

NAVFAC/NEPO

Mr. Vince Oliveira, Expeditionary Programs Office (ExPO) vincent.g.oliveira.ctr@navy.mil
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED FEB 24 2010 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 10 0289

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed informa pauperis andpro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffclaims ownership ofcertain real propertyin the District ofColumbia, and it appears that a "disgruntle[d] heir" has challenged the matter in the Superior Court ofthe District ofColumbia, Probate Division. CompI.**~** 1. It appears that the ongoingprobate matterprevents plaintifffrom collecting rent. See id. He demands an order directing the Superior Court "to release his funds and property[.]" Id.**~** 2. Because this federal district court has no authorityto review the decisions ofthe Superior Court, seeFleming v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994) (applyingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462,482 (1983)), aff'd, 1994 WL 474995 (D.C. Cir. July 27, 1994) (per curiam), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995), orto otherwise interfere with ongoing Superior Court proceedings, the court will dismiss the complaint for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this date.
No. 11A485.

#### Reginald Brooks, Applicant v. David Bobby, Warden.

565 U.S. 1047, 132 S. Ct. 608,

181 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8290.

November 15, 2011.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kagan, and by her referred to the Court, denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 3931

_____________________________
E DWARD S TEINER , Appellant,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , FDOC
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. J. Lee Marsh , Judge

. August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OWE , K ELSEY and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Edward Steiner, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Adam D.G. Wright, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
This Procurement Technical Assistance Center is funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency
Your Resource for Selling to Primes, Federal, State & Local Government Agencies

This Procurement Technical Assistance Center is funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency
njit.edu/ptac

$1.6 Billion*

Awarded to NJIT PTAC Clients

Expand Your Procurement Opportunities

*August 2016 to July 2019 
Provide technical assistance to:

● Understand, prepare for, and navigate the procurement 

process

● Conduct market research 

● Identify viable procurement opportunities

● Guide and review solicitations/proposals

● Increase odds of winning contracts in public and private 

sectors

njit.edu/ptac

What We 

Do
njit.edu/ptac

Services & Resources

• Free Individualized Counseling • Proposal/Solicitation Assistance & 

Reviews

• Market Research - Target Marketing • Supply Chain Events - Industry & Pitch 

Days

• Capability Statements • Government Buying Processes

• Electronic Bid Match • GSA Schedules

• SAM, DIBBS, Vendor Registrations • Wide Area Workflow – E-Payment 

Systems

• Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) • Government Regulations – FAR, DFARS

• Certifications & Verifications • Defense Contract Audit Agency Checklist

• Matchmaking – Public & Private Sectors • Training Seminars, Workshops & 

Webinars
• New Jersey-based business 

• Established for at least 2 years

• Customer base that demonstrates past performance

• Must not be delinquent with child support or taxes

• Credit worthy

• Business bank account

• Computer literate

• Company website and email preferred

njit.edu/ptac

Client 

Criteria
NJIT PTAC Headquarters:

323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd

490 Fenster Hall

Newark, NJ 07102

(973) 596-3105

Jumbo@NJIT.edu

www.NJIT.edu/PTAC

Satellite Offices:

Atlantic City

Camden

Totowa

njit.edu/ptac

Office 

Locations

This Procurement Technical Assistance Center is funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency
Your formal request for technical assistance is required at:

NJIT.edu/PTAC

njit.edu/ptac 

How Do I Become a NJIT PTAC 

Client?

This Procurement Technical Assistance Center is funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency
No. 11-6767.

#### Mark Russell Psick, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1020, 132 S. Ct. 565,

181 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8003.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 646.
No. 11-5149.

#### Larry Welenc, Petitioner v. Florida (two judgments).

565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 570,

181 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7982.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Agenda	– October	16,	2014

Subcommittee on Rooms and Spaces

Introductions

Review of agenda

Review revised previous subcommittee document

Discuss “Controls and Operating Mechanisms”

Next steps

Assignments

Next meeting

Adjourn

[attachments]
No. 11-6412.

#### Stephfon Cover, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 969, 132 S. Ct. 469,

181 L. Ed. 2d 306,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7493.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.