alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_6.htm










	Base Salaries of Executive Officers of the Registrant	Exhibit 10.6





 




As of March 1, 2012, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of Old Point Financial Corporation:


 



	Robert F. Shuford, Sr. 	 	$	300,000	 
	Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Louis G. Morris	 	$	275,000	 
	Executive Vice President/OPNB	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert F. Shuford, Jr. 	 	$	194,170	 
	Senior Vice President/Operations	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Joseph R. Witt  	 	$	191,531	 
	Senior Vice President/Corporate Banking	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Melissa L. Burroughs	 	$	177,800	 
	Senior Vice President/Lending & Business Development	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Laurie D. Grabow   	 	$	176,001	 
	Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Eugene M. Jordan, II 	 	$	164,832	 
	Executive Vice President/Trust	 	 	 	 
	Old Point Financial Corporation
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                     Certification of Chief Financial Officer
             Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March  31,  2005  of  the  Company  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 9, 2005

                                              /S/      GARY L. CLARK
                                              -----------------------------------
                                                             Gary L. Clark
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3125 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3125

           To reverse declining milk consumption in schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Ms. Kuster of 
   New Hampshire, Mr. Welch, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Kind, Mr. 
Brindisi, Mr. Delgado, Mrs. Craig, Mr. Cox of California, Ms. DelBene, 
 Mr. Costa, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Reschenthaler, 
Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Katko, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Comer, Mr. 
 Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Grothman, Ms. Finkenauer, Mr. O'Halleran, 
 Mr. Schrader, and Mr. Duffy) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To reverse declining milk consumption in schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Milk Nutrition Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FLUID MILK.

    Section 9(a)(2) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph (A) 
inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Lunches served by schools 
                participating in the school lunch program under this 
                Act--
                            ``(i) shall offer students a variety of 
                        fluid milk. Such milk shall be consistent with 
                        the most recent Dietary Guidelines for 
                        Americans published under section 301 of the 
                        National Nutrition Monitoring and Related 
                        Research Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5341);
                            ``(ii) may offer students flavored and 
                        unflavored fluid milk, including low-fat 
                        flavored milk and lactose-free fluid milk; and
                            ``(iii) shall provide a substitute for 
                        fluid milk for students whose disability 
                        restricts their diet, on receipt of a written 
                        statement from a licensed physician that 
                        identifies the disability that restricts the 
                        student's diet and that specifies the 
                        substitute for fluid milk.''.
                                 <all>
```
Field Name    				Length  
------------  				--------
FIIG_4065				VAR/DLM(|)
INC_4080				VAR/DLM(|)
MRC_3445				VAR/DLM(|)
SAC_CDNG_IND_0115			VAR/DLM(|)
DIML_MRC_IND_0326			VAR/DLM(|)
PRPTN_EDIT_CD_0762			VAR/DLM(|)
ISAC_IND_CD_0826			VAR/DLM(|)
SCR_KEY_CD_1047				VAR/DLM(|)
RPLY_TBL_DCOD_3845			VAR/DLM(|)
TAIL_SEQ_NO_4403			VAR/DLM(|)
FIIG_SEQ_NO_4404			VAR/DLM(|)
MRC_IND_CD_8450				VAR/DLM(|)
No. 11-5743.

#### Kamphiene Xayavongsane, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 345,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6874.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 63 So. 3d 770.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     BALANCE SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1999    APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               18,345         18,345
<SECURITIES>                              0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       229,512        229,512
<ALLOWANCES>                              0              0
<INVENTORY>                         133,156        133,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    404,944        404,944
<PP&E>                              130,054        130,054
<DEPRECIATION>                            0              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      545,961        545,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               799,589        799,589
<BONDS>                                   0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0              0
<PREFERRED>                               0              0
<COMMON>                         10,000,000     10,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                0              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        545,961        545,961
<SALES>                             386,813        927,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    386,813        927,891
<CGS>                               299,492        744,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    341,493        846,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    5,515          6,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (259,404)      (659,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (259,404)      (659,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0        493,938
<CHANGES>                                 0              0
<NET-INCOME>                       (259,404)    (1,153,617)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.06)         (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.06)         (0.27)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.34

SUMMARY OF THE COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS OF THE COMPANYS BOARD OF

DIRECTORS



| |  |  | Directors will be paid an annual retainer of $40,000/fiscal year, payable quarterly in arrears, beginning with the Companys 2007 fiscal year;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Directors shall receive an annual grant of Common Stock of the Company with a value of $30,000 pursuant to the Companys 2006 Incentive Plan and in accordance
with the terms of the Directors Share Awards Guidelines, beginning with the Companys 2007 annual shareholders meeting;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Chairman of each of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee shall receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 and the
Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, payable quarterly in arrears, beginning with the Companys 2007 fiscal year;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The fee paid to each Director for each meeting of the Board that he or she attends shall be $1,500, and shall be $1,000 for each Committee meeting that he or she
attends, except that a Director shall receive $500 for any meeting attended telephonically;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Lead Director of the Company shall be paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000/fiscal year, payable quarterly in arrears, beginning with the Companys
2007 fiscal year.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additionally, the Company will reimburse directors for all reasonable expenses incurred by them in
connection with attendance at any meeting of the Board or its Committees and for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors of the Company.

There is no written agreement with respect to compensation payable to any Director.
No. 10-10784.

#### Donald Miller, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 496,

181 L. Ed. 2d 345,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7821.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 841.
No. 10-7634.

#### Matthew Gale, Petitioner v. Ricky Anderson.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1049,

178 L. Ed. 2d 869,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 977.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 394.
No. 11-6145.

#### Thomas Joseph Dalton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 955, 132 S. Ct. 429,

181 L. Ed. 2d 279,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7189.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 164.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6692** 

CLARENCE T. FOX, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
ERIC HOLDER, I n his official capaci ty; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, I n its official capacity; WARDEN DARLENE DREW, I n her official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Henry F. Floyd , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00780

- HFF )

Submitted : September 28, 2010 Decided: Octobe r 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordi ngly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v. Holder , No.
2:10

- cv - 00780

- HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court a nd argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<![CDATA[Letter extending Management Agreement with John W. Henry & Company, Inc.]]>



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 John W. Henry & Company, Inc. 

301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200 
 Boca Raton,
Fl. 33431-4931 
 Attn: Mr. Ken Webster 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Webster: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Westport JWH Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 JWH Master Fund LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 JWH Global Analytics Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kenneth Webster
		 	Print Name: Kenneth Webster

 JM/sr
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual of Federal Screw Works (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, W.T.
ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

      (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

December 6, 2004

                                 /s/ W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman of the Board,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
                                 Federal Screw Works
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3893 STANDARD 42.12 5.35 19.45

Tolerance

1 3893A GREEN LIMIT 43.13 4.68 18.88 1.01 -0.67 -0.57 0.92

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3893

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 11, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, DUCK, TEXTURED NYLON, 500 

DENIER MIL-C-32439
Percentage of private provider sites actively participating in a grantee

immunization information system-- United States, six cities§, and eight Territories†, 2009

§ Chicago, IL (0%-33%);

District of Columbia (95%–100%); 

Houston, TX (34%–66%); 

New York City, NY (67%–94%); 

Philadelphia, PA (67%–94%); 

San Antonio, TX (0%–33%).

National Coverage: 38% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2009 IISAR

* In transition is defined as a grantee implementing a new 

IIS product.

† American Samoa (No Report);

Guam (0%–33%);

Marshall Islands (No Report);

Federated States of Micronesia (No Report);

N. Mariana Islands (No Report);

Palau (in Transition);

Puerto Rico (34%-66%);

Virgin Islands (No Report).

No report

In Transition*

0-33%

34-66%

67-94%

95-100%
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38668-38669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on July 6, 1998, a proposed consent 
decree in United States v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn., Civil Action No. 
97-CV-12583-NG, was lodged with the United States

[[Page 38669]]

District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
    In this action against defendant W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn. 
(``Grace''), the United States seeks reimbursement of certain response 
costs and a declaratory judgment for future response costs regarding 
the W.R. Grace Superfund Site (the ``Site''), located in Action, 
Massachusetts. Grace has owned and operated a facility at the Site 
since 1954. The consent decree provides that Grace will reimburse the 
United States $1,525,000 for Past Response Costs out of about $4.2 
million (including interest) and reimburse the United States for all 
Future Oversight Costs at the Site. Grace is performing cleanup 
activities at the Site pursuant to a 1980 settlement of claims under 
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn., Civil Action No. 97-CV-12583-
NG, D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-1241.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the at the Region I 
Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, One Congress Street, 
Boston, Massachusetts, 02203 (contact Gretchen Muench, 617-565-4904) 
and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent 
decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $8.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-19123 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

COMMERCE UNION BANK AND COMMERCE UNION BANCSHARES, INC. 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO

 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to that certain Management Incentive Stock Option Agreement dated August 23, 2006, (the
“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the date set forth below, by and among Commerce Union Bank (the “Bank”), Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), and the optionee whose name
appears below (“Optionee”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Bank entered into that certain Agreement and Plan of
Share Exchange (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), dated April 26, 2011, pursuant to which, as of June 6, 2012, the Company assumed all responsibilities and obligations of the Bank with respect to all
outstanding Bank Stock Options, as defined in the Share Exchange Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company, the Bank, and the Optionee
now wish to amend the Agreement to revise the terms under which the Optionee may exercise Options. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the undersigned agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment of Section 5(b). Section 5(b) of the Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. Management Incentive Stock Option Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the current contents thereof in their
entirety and substituting therefor the following: 

 5(b). In the event employment of the Optionee by the Bank is terminated,
Optionee may exercise any vested portion of the Option at any time prior to the original Expiration Date of said Option, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors of Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc., and in accordance with
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of Optionee’s retirement, which shall be deemed to occur when Optionee reaches the age of sixty-five (65) (“Retirement Date”), any
unvested portion of any and all Options shall become vested on such Retirement Date. 
  

	 	2.	Amendment of Section 5(c). Section 5(c) of the Commerce Union Bancshares, Inc. Management Incentive Stock Option Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the current contents thereof in their
entirety and substituting therefor the following: 

 5(c). In the event of the death of the Optionee while actively employed
by the Bank, any vested portion of the Option may be exercised at any time within one year after the date of death by the personal representative or the estate of the Optionee or by any person who has acquired the Option from the Optionee by bequest
or inheritance. 
 Signatures on following page 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, the Bank, and the Optionee have duly executed this Second
Amendment to the Management Incentive Stock Option Agreement, which shall be deemed effective as of June 19, 2014. 
  

					
	COMMERCE UNION BANCSHARES, INC.	 		 	OPTIONEE
	AND	 		 	
	COMMERCE UNION BANK	 		 	
		 		 	  

		 		 	(Signature)
			
	  
	 		 	  

	William Ronald DeBerry, President and CEO	 		 	(Print Name)


  
 2
No. 11-6824.

#### James J. McAndrew, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 569,

181 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7944.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.