alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2615

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Benny Lee Jackson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

 ____________

 Submitted: March 6, 2019

Filed: March 11, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Benny Lee Jackson appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he pled

guilty to a firearm offense. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court

dismisses the appeal.

Counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. The

district court accepted the parties’ binding Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, and imposed a sentence pursuant to the plea agreement. 

This court concludes that the appeal waiver is enforceable, as the record demonstrates

that Jackson entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and

voluntarily, his challenge to the sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver,

and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United

States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v.

Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced

if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered

into waiver and plea agreement, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage

of justice). 

This court has reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and found no non-frivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal

waiver. 

The appeal is dismissed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-
No. 11-6220.

#### Ronald Velasquez, Petitioner v. Richard Kirkland, Warden.

565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 554,

181 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7942.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*401Same case below, 639 F.3d 964.
No. 11-5777.

#### Henock Colimon, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 347,

181 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7011.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 821.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


ASSIGNMENT OF SALE AGREEMENT


 


This Assignment of Sale
Agreement is made as of the 27th day of June, 2014, by IREIT BUSINESS MANAGER AND ADVISOR, INC., an Illinois corporation
(“Assignor”), to and for the benefit of IREIT FLOWOOD DOGWOOD, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Assignee”).


 


Assignor does
hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over, and convey unto Assignee all of its right, title and interest (i) as Purchaser under that
certain Sale Agreement dated as of April 30, 2014 (as amended, the “Agreement”) by and between Dogwood Festival,
L.L.C., an Alabama Illinois limited liability company, as Seller, and Assignor, as Purchaser, with respect to certain improved
real property commonly known as Dogwood Festival Market, as more particularly described by the Agreement (the “Property”)
and (ii) under all estoppel certificates and letters delivered to Assignor in connection with the Agreement.


 


Assignor represents and
warrants that it is the Purchaser under the Agreement, and that it has not sold, assigned, transferred, or encumbered such interest
in any way to any other person or entity. By acceptance hereof, Assignee accepts the foregoing assignment and agrees, from and
after the date hereof, to (i) perform all of the obligations of Purchaser under the Agreement with respect to the Property, and
(ii) indemnify, defend, protect and hold Assignor harmless from and against all claims and liabilities arising under the Agreement
with respect to the Property.


 


[signatures on following page]


 


 


1




    	 



    	 



    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have
executed this instrument as of the date first written above.


 


 


	 	ASSIGNOR:
	 	 	 	 
	 	
        IREIT BUSINESS MANAGER AND ADVISOR, INC.

        an Illinois corporation

	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lou Quilici
	 	Printed Name:	Lou Quilici
	 	Title:	SRVP	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:
	 	 	 	 
	 	
        IREIT FLOWOOD DOGWOOD, L.L.C.,

        a Delaware limited liability company

	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	
        Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.,

        a Maryland corporation, its sole member

	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Marcia L. Grant
	 	Printed Name:	Marcia L. Grant
	 	Its:	Assistant Secretary


 




2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3284 

To require the Attorney General to study whether an individual’s history 

of domestic violence can be used to determine the likelihood of such 

individual committing a mass shooting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. QUIGLEY (for himself, Ms. MOORE, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. WILD, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. MEEKS, 

Mr. BEYER, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. DEAN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. SMITH of Washington, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Attorney General to study whether an individual’s history of domestic violence can be used to determine the likelihood of such individual committing a mass 

shooting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3284 IH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY ON WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL’S HIS2 TORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CAN BE USED 

3 TO DETERMINE THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH 

4 INDIVIDUAL COMMITTING A MASS SHOOTING. 

5 Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Attorney General of the United States 

7 shall complete a study and submit a report to the Con8 gress on whether an individual’s history of domestic vio9 lence can be used to determine the likelihood of such indi10 vidual committing a mass shooting. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6133
GEORGE MAURICE LEWIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE; JOHN JABE; P. A. TERRANGI; H. D. UNDERWOOD; MICHAEL PFEIFFER; C. HARLAND; DR. SWEATTER; DR. OZINA; DR. SCHILLENGER; DR. KENDRICKS; J. C. STEERE; DR. ALASARRAF, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexa ndria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1450-AM) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Maurice Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on November 14, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on December 22, 1995. Appellant's failure to notea timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-131.

#### Barr Laboratories, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Cancer Research Technology Limited, et al.

565 U.S. 977, 132 S. Ct. 499,

181 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7709.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

*347Same case below, 625 F.3d 724.
May 5, 2023 DLA-SM-23-3233

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR April 2023

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during April 2023.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

NO 

SALES

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST NO 

SALES

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001

Lbs W NO 

SALES

Tin Amendment 001

Lbs

NO

SALES

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40283-40284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and

[[Page 40284]]

approval under the Paperwork Reduction act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for OMB review and approval of the information collection system 
described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Real Estate Lending Standards.
    OMB Number: 3064-0112.
    Annual Burden: Estimated annual number of respondents--6,100; 
Estimated time per response--25 hours; Average annual burden hours--
152,500 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: September 30, 1998.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before August 27, 1998 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Institutions will use real estate lending 
policies to guide their lending operations in a manner that is 
consistent with safe and sound banking practices and appropriate to 
their size, nature and scope of their operations. These policies should 
address certain lending considerations, including loan-to-value limits, 
loan administration policies, portfolio diversification standards, and 
documentation, approval and reporting requirements.

    Dated: July 22, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20055 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 26, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000034408
<NAME> FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-26-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      43,558,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                644,614,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           750,672,692
<PP&E>                                     729,705,421
<DEPRECIATION>                             242,120,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,243,714,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      412,017,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,363,670
<OTHER-SE>                                 779,600,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,243,714,351
<SALES>                                  3,132,639,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,132,639,132
<CGS>                                    2,076,916,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,861,727,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            270,911,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                98,894,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        172,017,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               172,017,247
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00


</TABLE>
<page> AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CUSTOMER AGREEMENT
            WHEREAS,	MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER MILLBURN L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (the ?Customer?), and MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., a Delaware
corporation (?Morgan Stanley DW?), have agreed to amend
the Amended and Restated
Customer Agreement, dated as of the 13th day of November
2000 (the ?Customer Agreement?),
by and between the Customer and Morgan Stanley DW, to
 reduce the monthly brokerage fee
payable to Morgan Stanley DW.
            WHEREAS, all provisions contained in the Customer
Agreement remain in full
force and effect and are modified only to the extent
 necessary to provide for the amendment set
forth below.
            NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby
 amend the Customer Agreement
as follows:
            1.	The monthly brokerage fee percentage
 referred to in the first paragraph of
Section 5 of the Customer Agreement is hereby
 reduced to 1/12 of 6.25% (a 6.25% annual rate).
            2.	The foregoing change shall take effect
 as of the 1st day of August 2003.


<page> TNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Customer Agreement has
been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned
as of the 31st day of July 2003.
MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER MILLBURN L.P.
By:	Demeter Management Corporation,
	General Partner
By:   /s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Name:  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Title:  President
MORGAN STANLEY DW INC.
By:	/s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Name:  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Title:  Executive Director

Exhibit 10.05(a)
NYLIB1 679808.1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6445
RONALD JERRY SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; COLIN ANGLICKER; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON; CAPTAIN FERGUSON; LIEUTENANT HALL; CAPTAIN HALL; BOB STAMPER; HERMAN L. WYNN; ISA OHARA; CORRECTIONAL CONNER; OFFICER THOMAS; OFFICER SLATE; CAPTAIN DAY; LIEUTENANTSPROUSE; L. SAUNDERS; SERGEANT BRAXTON; SERGEANT WINDELL; SERGEANT STONE; OFFICER HAHN; OFFICER CARTER; OFFICER RINGOLD; OFFICER SPRO USE; H. D. GOULDIN; MAJOR BOYCE; CAPTAIN BRUCE; CAPTAIN R. STARKS; R. SMITH, Captain; OFFICER LIPSCONE; LIEUTENANT ROGERS; FRED GREENE; WAYNE KINCAID; OFFICER MCDUFFY; G. D. JOHNSON, Major, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-1392-R) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sawyer v. Angelone , No. CA-95-1392-R (W.D. VA. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Tobacco companies want 

you to think smoking menthols 

is cool. Having a stroke from 

smoking isn’t cool.

Ethan B., age 59, California

Ethan smoked and had multiple strokes which affected his memory. But he still 

remembers the menthol cigarette ads from his youth. Even today, tobacco companies 

aggressively target Black communities with menthol cigarette marketing – in stores, 

magazines, and social media, as well as online and at events.

You can quit. 

For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW

Scan for free resources 

to help you quit smoking Developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
No. 11-6342.

#### Devino Patera Putney, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 523,

181 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7717.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 302.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-12-00466-CV

_________________

EDWARD NEGRETE JR., Appellant

V.

CITIZENS STATE BANK, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 88th District Court

Tyler County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 22460

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The appellant, Edward Negrete Jr., filed a notice of bankruptcy. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 8.1. This proceeding is abated for administrative purposes only, and will be treated as a 

closed case unless timely reinstated by proper motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.

ORDER ENTERED January 24, 2013. 

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
No. 10-712.

#### William Morris, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Robert G. Swofford.

562 U.S. 1201, 131 S. Ct. 1053,

178 L. Ed. 2d 866,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1057.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 559.
No. 11-6007.

#### In re Robert Montgomery, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 393,

181 L. Ed. 2d 247,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6207.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-43.

#### Keidrick C. Wooten, et al., Petitioners v. Quicken Loans Inc.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 245,

181 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5215.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*141Same case below, 626 F.3d 1187.
No. 11-310.

#### Adolfo Sandor Montero, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 519,

181 L. Ed. 2d 350,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7825.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 738.
Stephen C. Uchniat

President of Liberty Bell Chapter 266

Vietnam Veterans of America

Stephen Uchniat was raised in the Fairhill/Kensington section of Philadelphia. He attended Jules E. 

Mastbaum High School and enlisted in the U.S. Army in February 1967 during his senior year. He 

graduated in June 1967, and left for basic training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, two weeks later. 

After completing bootcamp, Uchniat was sent to the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland for 

schooling. He then received his orders for Vietnam and was sent to Qui Nhon, then to the 526 

Collection, Classification and Storage (CC&S) Company of the 5th Maintenance Battalion in the Phu 

Tai Valley.

After a yearlong tour in Vietnam, Uchniat was sent to Mannheim Germany, where he was stationed 

with the Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC) of the 1st Support Brigade for 15 months.

Uchniat was discharged in June 1970 with the rank of Specialist Five. He was only 20 years old.

He married his wife, Julie, in June 1979. They have two children and two grandchildren.

Uchniat retired from Thomas Jefferson Hospital after 28 years of service.

He became active in the veterans’ community with the start of the Philadelphia Vietnam Veterans 

Memorial. He has served as President of the Liberty Bell Chapter 266 for more than 15 years.

In addition to the Vietnam Veterans of America, Uchniat is a member of American Legion Post 

738, D.A.V. Naomi Chapter 15, VFW Post 2819, Catholic War Veterans At Large

Vietnam Veterans of America Liberty Bell Chapter 266.