alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-5864.

#### Shon Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 353,

181 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6885.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 336.
# Active MPL Ability One NSNs
| 1. | the      annual report on Form 10-Q of Falcon Ridge Development Inc., for the      period ended December 31, 2008  (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon      Ridge Development Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |
|   |   |

|                                 |                                                              |                         |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                              |
|                                 |                                                              |                         |
| Dated:  March      3, 2009 |                                                              | /s/ Karen      Y. Duran |
|                                 | Karen      Y. Duran,                                              |
|                                 | Chief      Financial Officerof      Falcon Ridge Development,Inc. |
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 392 -CR M anue l He r nande zRo ble s , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-07 -20 7468 , HO NORAB LE B RENDA KENNEDY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Manuel He rnande z R obles seeks to a ppeal f rom a judgment of convic tion for kidnapping . The trial c ourt has ce rtified that this is a plea ba rg ain ca se, that R o bles waive d his right to appe al, and that Robles has n o right of appe al. The a ppeal is dismissed. See Tex R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d).

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

17, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT January 31, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature T-SHIRT, POLYESTER JERSEY

Shade Number DESERT SAND 503 Piece/Roll Number ROLL 3758

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dE*

Standard -------------------- 67.08 2.72 11.03 -------- -------- -------- -------

Tolerance

1

3758* Green limit -0.67 -0.67 -0.86 1.07

2

3758* Red limit -0.11 0.12 -0.3 0.35

3

3758* Blue limit 0.03 -0.42 -0.36 0.6

4

3758*

Light and Blue 

limit 1.03 -0.05 -1.0 0.91

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY

* Represents tolerances that were established prior to procedure to letter tolerances was established
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT ROY HENION,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1926

[February 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-9891CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00044

- CV

SI INVESTMENTS CORP., SARBJIT KAUR AND IQBAL KAUR, Appellants

V.

RN SWEET I, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- 1980

- CCL2

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, representing that they have

fully and finally resolved any pending issues related to the judgment from which this appeal was

filed. Under the authority of Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of A ppellate Procedure and in

keeping with the parties’ wishes, we grant the motion to dismiss. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

We dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 16, 2018

Date Decided: July 17, 2018
J. 

NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). A petitioner may be entitled to review 

of defaulted claims if failure to review the claims would result in a 

fundamental miscarriage of justice. Mazzan v. Warden, 112 Nev. 838, 842, 

921 P.2d 920, 922 (1996). In order to demonstrate a fundamental 

miscarriage of justice, a petitioner must make a colorable showing of 

actual innocence of the crime. Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 887, 34 

P.3d 519, 537 (2001). 

Appellant did not attempt to demonstrate good cause for his 

untimely and successive petition. Rather, appellant argued that he was 

actually innocent because he was not the shooter and he did not have the 

specific intent that his co-defendant kill the victims who were shot at from 

the vehicle appellant was driving. Appellant did not present any new 

evidence of his innocence, but rather argued the facts presented at trial. 

Under these circumstances, appellant did not demonstrate actual 

innocence because he failed to show that "it is more likely than not that no 

reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of. . . new evidence." 

Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 559 (1998) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 

513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); see also Pellegrini, 117 Nev. at 887, 34 P.3d at 

537; Mazzan, 112 Nev. at 842, 921 P.2d at 922. We therefore conclude 

that the district court did not err in denying appellant's petition. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Parraguirre 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

C"Cr":2222=7 

J. 

Saitta 

Pickering 

(0) 947A 
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Rommie Moss 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 23, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 23, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A2107. SHA'CLIFIYA L. THOMAS v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF AUGUSTA.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On August 03, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than August 14, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIESCORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as MasterServicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-GC22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Dirctor, of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificateas of the 28th day of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton 

Leslie Hayton 

ManagingDirector

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month 

Proclamation April 2021 

"Protecting Our People Protects Our Mission" 

Sexual assault is a devastating criminal act that is incompatible with the Defense Logistics Agency’s core 

values, high standards of professionalism, and personal discipline. Sexual assault disrupts the lives and 

performance of all service members and civilian employees and endangers our ability to support the Warfighter 

and our other valuable customers. We must create a culture in which sexual assault and harassment are “Not in 

Our DLA”! 

Since the establishment of the DLA Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program in 2016, significant 

strides have been made to promote awareness. We have instituted robust prevention initiatives to cultivate an 

organizational culture where sexual assault is never tolerated! Driving forces behind our continued progress are 

the dedicated DLA SAPR workforce, internal and external partners, and courageious survivors. 

The results of our SAPR efforts over the past five years have been positive, but there is still much work to be 

done. DLA is focused on advancing its prevention strategy to align with the Department of Defense 2019-2023 

Prevention Plan of Action. A strong primary prevention strategy is key to preventing sexual violence and will 

require DLA-wide involvement. There is power in numbers, so let us unite to eliminate sexual harassment and 

assault and continue to strengthen the core of our great agency. 

This month, I charge every DLA employee with the responsibility to maintain high standards of 

professionalism, treat each other with dignity and respect, and be aware of one’s own behavior. 

THEREFORE, I, Vice Admiral Michelle C. Skubic, Director, Defense Logistics Agency, joined by my Vice 

Director and our Senior Enlisted Leader, do hereby proclaim the month of April 2021 as Sexual Assault 

Awareness and Prevention Month within DLA. 

M. C. SKUBIC 

Vice Admiral, SC, USN 

Director 

TOMEKA N. O’NEAL 

CSM, USA 

Senior Enlisted Leader 

BRAD BUNN 

Vice Director
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19793]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER NUMBER: 18998.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE & TIME: Tuesday, July 21, 1998--10:00 a.m., 
Meeting Closed to the Public.
    This Meeting Has Been Cancelled.

Date & Time: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be discussed: 
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

DATE & TIME: Thursday, July 30, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 1998-14: Eugene F. Douglass, and Eugene F. 
Douglass for U.S. Senate.
    Advisory Opinion 1998-15: Fitzgerald for Senate, Inc., by Richard 
A. Roggeveen, Treasurer.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19793 Filed 7-21-98; 11:13 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```
(1) Adjusting Price $17.90 CWT

(2) Base Price $18.34 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.44)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0378)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0189)

Price change per quart ($0.0095)

Price change per pint ($0.0047)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0035)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0030)

Price change per half pint ($0.0024)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.04)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.02)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Jan. 3, 2016
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1163

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the 

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Thomas George Freeman, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 13, 2010

Filed: April 16, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Thomas Freeman challenges the sentence the

district court1

 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we

conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v.

Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are

reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.
-2-

220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
No. 11-6952.

#### Dale P. Dattilio, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1069, 132 S. Ct. 785,

181 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8507.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 187.
Privacy Reminders

4. Collecting and Maintaining Personal Information / PII.

Before you begin to design systems, forms, and/or surveys used to gather and store personal 

information / personally identifiable information (PII), consult with your local Privacy

Office. The Privacy Act of 1974, has requirements regarding, and therefore impacts what 

data elements you may collect and store, how the data is safeguarded, and who may be

granted access to the data. Non- compliance carries both criminal and civil penalties. 

Additional information is available in the training modules located on the DLA Privacy Act 

Training web page. 

<Return to Reminders Table>
Exhibit 23.8



VIA SEDAR / EDGAR



Ontario Securities Commission, as Principal Regulator

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



| | Re: | Sierra Metals Inc. (the “Company”)
| | --- | ----------------------------------

Annual Information Form
for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017	, incorporated by reference into the Company’s Prospectus
Supplement dated October 10, 2017 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated June 29, 2017 (the “Prospectus Supplement”)
and the Annual Report incorporated by reference into the Company’s registration statement on Form F-10 (Registration No.
333-218076) (the “Registration Statement”)

Consent of Qualified Person



Reference is made to the Annual Report
on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 of the Company (the “Form 40-F”), filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Reference is also made to
the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “AIF”), and its incorporation
by reference: (i) into the Prospectus Supplement, and (ii) as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the Form 40-F.



I hereby consent to the: (i) inclusion
of the summary section of the report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Bolivar Mine, Mexico”
dated effective February 28, 2017 (the “Bolivar Technical Report”) in the AIF and any amendments thereto, and
the incorporation of this report in the AIF, (ii) incorporation of the AIF in the Form 40-F and any amendments thereto, and in
the Company's Registration Statement, including the prospectus contained therein, as amended or supplemented, (iii) incorporation
by reference of the AIF and any amendments thereto, into the Prospectus Supplement and (iv) being named in, and the use of the
Bolivar Technical Report or portions thereof prepared, reviewed and/or approved by me, in the AIF and Form 40-F.



I also hereby confirm that I have read
the AIF and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived
from the Bolivar Technical Report or within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed in connection with the Bolivar
Technical Report.



[Signature page follows]



1







Dated: March 22, 2018



|/s/ Jon Larson                                         | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Jon Larson, BS Mining Engineering,MBA, MAusIMM, MMSAQP | 





2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5194

_____________________________

GIACINTO MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Bruce Anderson, Judge.

March 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Giacinto Martin, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
(1) Adjusting Price $17.24 CWT

(2) Base Price $21.97 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (4.73)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.41)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.20)

Price change per quart ($0.10) 

Price change per pint ($0.05)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.04)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.04)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.03)

Price change per half pint ($0.03)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.41)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.20)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.10)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.05)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.04)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.04)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.03)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.03)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. 

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Jan. 3, 2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In re the Complaint of 

JET CENTER PARTNERS, LLC

Complainant,

-againstCOUNTY OF MONTROSE, COLORADO 

Respondent.

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Docket No.: 16-15-11

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY

1. On September 17, 2015, the Respondent submitted its Motion for Summary 

Judgment in Docket No. 16-15-11. Under the Part 16 Procedural Rules, a response to a 

motion and a Reply shall be made within ten days of the date of service. Absent this 

Motion, the deadline for Reply would be September 26, 2015.

2. The Complainant hereby requests an extension to the deadline, until and 

including October 16, 2015, to submit its Reply. Through its Motion for Summary 

Judgment, the Respondent has presented new information concerning its relationship with 

a third party, MTJ FBO, which is a significant factor to the Complainant and aeronautical 

users of the Airport. The Complainant wishes to have sufficient time to evaluate this new 

information and how it affects the pendency of its Part 16 Complaint.
2

Dated: September 24, 2015

Jericho, New York

________________________________

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq.

Shelley A. Ewalt, Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainants

500 North Broadway, Suite 129

Jericho, New York 11753

Tel: (516) 364-1095

Fax: (516) 364-0612
CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that on September 24, 2015, I served the foregoing Motion to 

Extend Deadline to Reply on the following persons electronically:

Office of the Chief Counsel

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov

Bobbee J. Musgrave, Esq.

Stephen D. Rynerson, Esq.

Bryan Cave LLP

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4100

Denver, CO 80203

Bobbee.Musgrave@bryancave.com

Stephen.Rynerson@bryancave.com

Counsel to County of Montrose, Colorado

Carolyn Clawson, Esq.

County Attorney, County of Montrose, Colorado

Montrose County Attorney’s Office

161 S. Townsend Avenue

Montrose, Colorado 81401

cclawson@montrosecounty.net

___________________________

Shelley A. Ewalt, Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainant

500 North Broadway, Suite 129

Jericho, New York 11753

sewalt@mklawnyc.com

Tel: (516) 364-1095

Fax: (516) 364-0612
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 28, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 28, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0172. RAYVAUGHN T. NEAL v. JENNIFER A. NEAL.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2021CV356086