In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0654V 

(not to be published)

DONA KAPLAN, as Executrix of the 

Estate of Harold Kaplan,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 9, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Mark Theodore Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1

On May 2, 2019, Harold Kaplan filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”).3 Mr. Kaplan alleged that as a result of his October 2, 2017 influenza vaccination he 

suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration. (See Petition at 1). On 

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).

3 Dona Kaplan was substituted as Petitioner in this case on October 26, 2020, following the death of Mr. 

Kaplan. 
2

December 10, 2020, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based 

on the Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 37). 

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated January 22, 

2021 (ECF No. 40), requesting a total award of $22,991.27 (representing $22,276.71 in 

fees and $714.56 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a 

signed statement indicating that no out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. (ECF No. 47).

Respondent reacted to the motion on January 25, 2021, indicating that he is satisfied that 

the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case 

and defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 

41). On January 25, 2021, Petitioner filed a reply requesting the Court grant Petitioner’s 

motion for attorney’s fees and costs. (ECF No. 43). 

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my 

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested 

hours or rates. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I 

award a total of $22,991.27 (representing $22,276.71 in fees and $714.56 in costs) as a 

lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. In 

the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), 

the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice 

renouncing their right to seek review.