alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Met-Pro Corporation, Common Stock, $.10 Par Value) 
File No. 1-7763

July 1, 1998.
    Met-Pro Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Security of Met-Pro Corporation (``Company'') has been listed 
for trading on the Amex and, pursuant to a Registration Statement on 
Form 8-A which became effective on June 18, 1998, the New York Stock 
Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). Trading in the Company's Security on the 
NYSE commenced at the opening of business on June 18, 1998, and 
concurrently therewith such Security was suspended from trading on the 
Amex.
    The Company has complied with Rule 18 of the Amex by filing with 
such Exchange a certified copy of the resolutions adopted by the 
Company's Board of Directors authorizing the withdrawal of its Security 
from listing on the Amex and by setting forth in detail to such 
Exchange the reasons for such proposed withdrawal, and the facts in 
support thereof. In deciding to withdraw its security from listing on 
the Amex, the Company determined that, due to the potential increase in 
liquidity and visibility, it is in the best interests of the Company to 
list the Security for trading on the NYSE.
    By letter dated June 10, 1998, the Exchange informed the Company 
that it had no objection to the withdrawal of the Company's Security 
from listing on the Amex.
    By reason of Section 12 of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder, the Company shall continue to be obligated to file reports 
under Section 13 of the Act with the Commission and the NYSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before July 22, 1998, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Exchange 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18055 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
No. 11M39.

#### Jerry Michael Smith, Petitioner v. Richard Kirkland, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 542,

181 L. Ed. 2d 344,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7905.

October 31, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

*345Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 150.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 16, 2005
Letter to J E Moody and Company LLC




			
	June 1, 2011	 	Exhibit 10.9(b)

 J. E. Moody & Company LLC 
 245 SW Birds Hill Road 
 Portland, Oregon 97219-8503 

Attention: John E. Moody 

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Moody: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 JEM Master Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the
address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	J.E. MOODY & COMPANY LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John E. Moody



			
		
	Print Name:	 	 John E. Moody

		
	JM/sr
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In   connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Entech   Environmental
Technologies,  Inc., a Florida  corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, R. B. Lassetter,  as Principal
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated: February 17, 2006.

                                              /s/ R. B. Lassetter
                                              ---------------------------
                                              R. B. Lassetter, Principal
                                              Financial Officer
No. 10-9647.

#### Kuntrell Jackson, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 548,

181 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8076.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *396granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas granted. The case is to be argued in tandem with No. 10-9646, Miller v. Alabama, immediately supra.

Same case below, 2011 Ark. 49, 378 S.W.3d 103.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-18-00319-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 89th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court No. 188,463-C

Before Meier, Gabriel, and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

TOMMIE DENSON, Appellant

V.

CAPT N. SMITH AND C.O. ANGELLO SCHILLINGFORD, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 11, 2018, we notified Appellant Tommie Denson of our concern 

that we may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. The trial court’s judgment was signed on August 13, 2018, and no 

postjudgment motion was filed to extend the appellate deadline, so the notice of 

appeal was due September 12, 2018, but was not filed until October 4, 2018. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.1. And because Denson’s handwritten notice of appeal is dated

September 27, 2018, we further asked him to advise us whether he properly 

addressed, stamped, and delivered the notice of appeal to the prison mailbox for 

mailing to the trial court clerk on or before the last day for filing a motion to extend 

the time to file the notice of appeal—September 27, 2018—and if so, to provide us 

with a reasonable explanation for the late filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3, 

10.5(b)(2)(A). We have received no response. The filing of a notice of appeal invokes 

jurisdiction in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or timely filed 

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 29, 2018
September 23 , 2015

Mr. Alexander Zajac 4465 MacArthur Boulevard, NW.

, Apartment No. 210 Washington, DC 20007

Dear Mr. Zajac :

This is in response to your docket submission letter dated August 11 , 2015 (public docket

No. FAA

- 20 1 5

- 3470 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to amend § 121.589 (a) of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) . That petition for rulemaking you submitted proposes the FAA to amend the rule to standardize carry

- on baggage dimension s for flights within the United States

.

Th e FAA has considered your request . However, when the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR p art 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that se ction, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 3) the resources the FAA has available to address these issues.

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are critical to the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize its

limited rul emaking resources to deliver the most value to the aviation system as a whole. Although the issues raised in your petition may have merit, they do not address an immediate safety concern.

For the reasons stated above, we are unable to process your reques t and thereby deny your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73. Although the FAA has decided to deny this request, your comments and reasons for a rule change will be2 considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area

. Accor dingly, Docket

No. FAA

- 2015

- 3470 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu Director, Office of Rulemaking
Percentage of Private Provider Sites Actively Participating in 

Immunization Information Systems by Grantee, 2004

VT 14

NH NR

MA 3

RI 61

CT 100

NJ 20 

DE 90

MD 1

93

9

56

100

5

12

100

94

42

85

71

73

23

17

5

2

34

62

42

100

85

86

9

1

19

16

25

1

17

20

No Report

≤ 33

34-66

67-94

95-100

New York City 73 Houston 7

Philadelphia 96 San Antonio 95

Chicago NR DC 93

33

88

8

1

100

Source: Immunization Registry Annual Report, CY 2004

0

0

0

0

10
No. 11-435.

#### Eugene Davis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1015, 132 S. Ct. 566,

181 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8021.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*399Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 891.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.32 CWT 0.965 $10.92

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.2827 LB 3.5 $11.49

Class I Price $22.41

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.45 CWT 0.965 $11.05

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $3.2946 LB 3.5 $11.53

Class I Price $22.58

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (0.17)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.01)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.01)

Price change per quart ($0.00)

Price change per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price change per half pint ($0.00)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) ($0.00)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Jan 2nd, 2023
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3410 

To amend the renewable fuel program under the Clean Air Act to account 

for small refinery exemptions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the renewable fuel program under the Clean Air 

Act to account for small refinery exemptions, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCOUNTING FOR SMALL REFINERY EXEMP4 TIONS FROM RENEWABLE FUEL REQUIRE5 MENTS. 

6 Section 211(o)(9) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 7545(o)(9)) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(E) ACCOUNTING FOR FULL VOLUME OF

10 EXEMPTIONS.—For calendar year 2019 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3410 IH

1 each subsequent calendar year, in applying the 

2 provisions of this subsection, including para3 graph (3)(C)(ii), the Administrator shall ensure 

4 that exemptions granted to small refineries 

5 under this paragraph do not result in any re6 duction to the national quantity of renewable 

7 fuel required under paragraph (2).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT May 31, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, WIND RESISTANT SATEEN, COTTON AND NYLON

Shade Number FOLIAGE GREEN 504 Piece/Roll Number 3798

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3798 43.04 -1.47 2.08

Tolerance

1

THIN 

ORANGE 

LIMIT 1.58 -0.10 1.25 1.77

2 GREEN 

LIMIT 0.51 -0.45 0.71 1.08

3

THIN 

RED 

LIMIT 1.60 0.00 0.52 0.85

4

FULL 

YELLOW 

LIMIT -1.03 -0.34 0.74 1.14

5 ORANGE 

LIMIT 0.08 0.03 1.23 1.56

6 THIN 

LIMIT

2.27 -0.37 0.72 1.52

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SAMPLES READ 2 TIMES AND 

AVERAGED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,700
<SECURITIES>                                     5,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,900
<PP&E>                                       1,353,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,266,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,700
<BONDS>                                        687,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     503,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,266,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 342 

To improve mapping under the National Flood Insurance Program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To improve mapping under the National Flood Insurance 

Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Insurance Rate 

5 Map Interagency Technology Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘FIRM 

6 IT Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SHARING AND USE OF MAPS AND DATA. 

8 Subsection (b) of section 100216 of the Biggert9 Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (42 U.S.C. 

10 4101b(b)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 342 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

3 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

4 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

5 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

7 subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(D) consult and coordinate with the De9 partment of Defense, the United States Geo10 logical Survey, and the National Oceanic and 

11 Atmospheric Administration for the purpose of 

12 obtaining the most-up-to-date maps and other 

13 information of such agencies, including infor14 mation on topography, water flow, and any 

15 other issues, relevant to mapping for flood in16 surance purposes.’’; and 

17 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

18 (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking 

19 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

20 (B) by redesignating paragraph (E) as 

21 subparagraph (F); and 

22 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) 

23 the following new subparagraph: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 342 IH

1 ‘‘(E) any other information relevant to 

2 mapping for flood insurance purposes obtained 

3 pursuant to paragraph (1)(D); and’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS