alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3246 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 15, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require GAO review of certain TSA screening protocols, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 3246 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Traveling Parents 

3 Screening Consistency Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW. 

5 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

7 shall conduct a review of the Transportation Security Ad8 ministration’s (TSA) implementation of the Bottles and 

9 Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Act (Public Law 

10 114–293), as well as the effectiveness of TSA in ensuring 

11 screening protocol clarity and screening consistency relat12 ing to the screening of formula, breast milk, purified de13 ionized water for infants, and juice. Such review shall in14 clude the following: 

15 (1) Consider whether TSA effectively manages 

16 consistency of screening protocol applications for 

17 formula, breastmilk, purified deionized water for in18 fants, and juice, including the extent to which 

19 Transportation Security officers engage in screening 

20 beyond that which is prescribed through relevant 

21 policies and training. 

22 (2) Evaluate the need for TSA to update and 

23 revise procedures for such screening. 

24 (3) Assess whether TSA effectively tracks pas25 senger complaints related to such screening to mon26 itor trends and identify inconsistencies. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HR 3246 RFS

1 (4) Evaluate TSA’s communications and infor2 mation sharing practices for passengers, air carriers, 

3 and airports relating to screening protocols for such 

4 screening. 

5 (5) Evaluate TSA’s policies regarding the 

6 screening of passengers with nursing products, in7 cluding the extent to which such passengers are 

8 more likely to receive secondary screening. 

9 (6) Make recommendations for improving 

10 TSA’s overall screening practices relating to such 

11 screening. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter C. Waller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|February 3, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    PETER C.
WALLER       
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | Peter C. Waller              
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 10-7470.

#### Barry S. Jameson, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden.

562 U.S. 1153, 131 S. Ct. 944,

178 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 586.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 617.
No. 11-5685.

#### Juan M. Chavez, Petitioner v. Randy Grounds, Warden.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 340,

181 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7020.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336. 8708 EMAIL ADDRESS

mmckinnon @mckennalong.com

January 30, 2015

Re: Additional Information Filed in Support of AIG PC Global Services, Inc. Section

333 Petition for Exemption (Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 09 13 )

Gentlemen:

As you are aware, this office represents AIG PC Global Services, Inc. (" AIG PC Global

Services "), regarding the above

- referenced Petition for Exemption, in which AIG PC Global

Services seeks regulatory relief to operate s mall unmanned aircraft system ("sUAS") for

c ommercial purposes. Please accept this letter as confirmation that a copy of the AIG PC Global

Services UAS Operations Manual , which contains proprietary and con fidential information, was

hand

- delivered to Mr. T routman at the FAA Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace

Rules Division, on January 29, 2015.

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this

exemption request, please do not hesitate to call.

M C K ENNA L ONG & A LDRIDGE LLP

/ s/ Ma rk E. McKinnon

Mark E. McKinnon, Esq.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2018

t0523 

# Order

Clerk May 30, 2018

156845

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156845

COA: 339959

Wayne CC: 16

- 004598

- FC

NICOLE O’NEILL, a/k/a NICOLE MARIE

O’NEILL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 11-6300.

#### Steve Loren Scott, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 440,

181 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7227.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 642 F.3d 791.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III                         
|                   |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                             
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Gary M. Adams                                
|                   |  | Gary M. Adams                                    
|                   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



30
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*Dated:
                August 14, 2008*
            By:
            /s/*Michael
                S. Egan**Michael
                S. Egan**Chief
                Executive Officer*
Navy Clothing & Textile Update

Deputy Commander, Navy Uniforms

Navy Exchange Service Command

CAPT John D. Cassani

5 Nov 2020

Unclassified
2

Navy Uniform and OCIE 

Organization
Projects in 

Development

3

Projects in Execution

Navy C&T Projects

Improved PTU

Submarine 

Sweater

I-Boot 5

2-Piece FR (2PC-FR) 

Shipboard Uniform

NECC requirement for 

replacement FR Combat 

Ensemble

Shipboard Jacket

Face 

Coverings/Gaiters

COTS Flotation Device 

for Maritime Armor 

System (MAS)
4

OPNAV (Uniform Policy and Requirements) 

Mr. Rob Carroll, N13X Uniform Matters robert.b.carroll@navy.mil

NAVSUP/NEXCOM

CAPT John Cassani, Deputy Commander, Navy Uniform Programs John.Cassani@nexweb.org 

Ms. Laurra Winters, Director, Navy Clothing & Textiles Research Facility laurra.c.winters.civ@mail.mil

Mr. Mark Stephens, Director, Uniform Product Management Group Mark.Stephens@nexweb.org

Mr. Paul Shields, Director, Uniform Program Management Office Paul.Shields@nexweb.org

Ms. Lindsay Vance Bean, Divisional Merchandise Manager, Uniforms Lindsay.VanceBean@nexweb.org

NAVSEA

Mr. Edward Gray, Technical Warrant Holder Body Armor edward.gray1@navy.mil

Mr. Hank Kuzma, (DC/PPE) Technical Warrant Holder henry.j.kuzma@navy.mil

Mr. David Gwaltney, Assistant Program Manager david.gwaltney@navy.mil

NAVAIR

Jennifer Milan, Strategic Co-Lead/SOA IPTL Jennifer.milan@navy.mil

Ms. Tara Capecci, Lead Textile Engineer tara.capecci@navy.mil

NAVFAC/NEPO

Mr. Vince Oliveira, Expeditionary Programs Office (ExPO) vincent.g.oliveira.ctr@navy.mil

Navy Points of Contact
No. 11-6623.

#### In re Jon M. Cox, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 537,

181 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7707.

October 31, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3393 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3393

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for 
    the Corporation for Public Broadcasting after fiscal year 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2019

  Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
Rooney of Florida, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Babin, Mr. Norman, Mr. Wright, and 
 Mr. Mooney of West Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for 
    the Corporation for Public Broadcasting after fiscal year 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC 
              BROADCASTING AFTER FISCAL YEAR 2021.

    (a) In General.--Section 396 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 396) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(m) Prohibition on Federal Funds After Fiscal Year 2021.--No 
Federal funds may be made available to the Corporation for Public 
Broadcasting after fiscal year 2021.''.
    (b) Corporation Prohibited From Accepting Federal Funds.--
Subsection (g) of such section is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ``subject to 
        paragraph (3)(C),'' before ``obtain''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(C) accepting funds from the Federal Government after 
        fiscal year 2021.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (k)(3)(A)(iv)(II) of such 
section is amended by inserting ``through fiscal year 2021'' after 
``amounts received''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5840.

#### Jamerson Tillman and James Tillman, Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 351,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7035.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 289.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-659-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 8, 1998, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Applicant), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky, 
42304, filed in docket No. CP98-659-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.216(b) of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for approval to abandon a 
receipt meter located in Hopkins County, Kentucky, under Applicant's 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-407-000, pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth 
in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Applicant proposes to abandon by removal the Reynolds-Narge Creek 
receipt meter station, which was constructed in 1992. Applicant asserts 
that it is requesting such authorization because the producer has 
discontinued deliveries of natural gas at this meter. Applicant further 
asserts that the producer, Wiser Oil Company (Wiser), which had been 
delivering natural gas to this meter, has been acquired by Orbit Gas 
Company (Orbit), and the natural gas from Wiser's wells in this area is 
now being delivered to Orbit. It is also asserted that Wiser has cut 
and capped its line to the meter station.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19447 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5886.

#### Horace Linton Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 577,

181 L. Ed. 2d 426,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8179.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 351.
No. 11-5527.

#### Kim Roger Crawford, Petitioner v. James Hartley, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 324,

181 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5855.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7411** 

RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TONI MCCOY, correctional officer, individual capacity , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 01814

- RBH )

Submitted : July 1, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Raymond Edward Chestnut , Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (19 71). *

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Chestnut v. McCoy , No. 1:13

- cv
- 01814

- RBH (D.S.C. Aug.
20, 2014). Chestnut’s motions for appointment of counsel are

deni ed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as modified to reflect that the action is deemed a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) due to its frivolousness.
No. 11-5681.

#### Jared Lloyd Shanklin, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 409,

181 L. Ed. 2d 267,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7324.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*268Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 319.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

|   | 1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-233231) of Calyxt, Inc. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-231336) pertaining to the Calyxt, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Calyxt, Inc. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-219382) pertaining to the Calyxt, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Calyxt, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan of Calyxt, Inc. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

of our report dated March 4, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Calyxt, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 4, 2020
**UNCLASSIFIED**

DLA Disposition Services EDA Letter of Request (LOR) Justification

These questions need to be answered and returned with the LOR as this type of information is required (as appropriate) for each EDA request, per DSCA:  

· What is the item?   	

· For blanket orders – in addition to the Federal Supply Code/Class - what exactly is the country looking to obtain (e.g. tents, uniforms, boots)?

· For defined order items what specific type, model and NSN (if possible) is the country looking to obtain (e.g. refueller, HEMTT, FMTV)

· Type Funding to be used (FMF, National Funds, etc.)?

· What type of transportation will be used? 

· A Freight Forwarder or US Government Transportation System?

· If using US Government Transportation, which Delivery Term Code (DTC) will be used (7 or 9)?

· What Military Assistance Program Address Code (MAPAC) is to be used?

· What Mark-For-Address (TAC M) is to be used (if multiples)?

· Recipient units must be identified EDA requests (can be for general supply). 

· What is the end-use of the item? 

· Who is the end-user of the item (Army, Air Force, Navy, Security Forces, etc.)?

· Is this part of a modernization project? 

· Will the items be refurbished, used for parts, etc.? 

· If the items are to be refurbished, where and by whom?

· Are the items additional or replacement assets?

· What is the current inventory of the items?

· Are the items for training or active use? 

· What are the immediate threats in the region? 

· How will the items support the country/region?

· Will the items be used in a specific region of the country?   Where will they be located?

· Will the items be used in a specific long-term NATO or Allied campaign/ operation?  

· If the quantities in the MILDEP request do not match the country request, this needs to be explained 

N/A

· Why is the transfer a grant and not a sale?

· Why is the transfer in the U.S. national interest? 

The following “big picture” information is required for processing the authorization of each EDA request package:

· How will this work with:

· Other EDA requested/authorized? 

· Other FMS/FMF requested/implemented/transferred? 

· Other Building Partnership Capacity efforts (e.g. 1206, IMET, etc.)? 

· Other training? 

**UNCLASSIFIED**
March 6, 2023 DLA-SM-23-3230

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR February 2023

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during February 2023.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

1,161 $3.01 M *

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST 60 $528 K CCMA LLC, 

Voss Metals

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001

Lbs W NO 

SALES

Tin Amendment 001 MT 19.5 $491 K *

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld