alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO THE


EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST OF


SOUTHWEST GEORGIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION


(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January
1, 2009)


 


This Amendment entered
into this __14 day of December, 2011, by and between SOUTHWEST GEORGIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a holding company organized
under the laws of the State of Georgia (the “Company”) and SOUTHWEST GEORGIA BANK, a state banking association, as
trustee (the “Trustee”);


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company
maintains the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust of Southwest Georgia Financial Corporation, as last amended and restated
effective January 1, 2009, and as subsequently amended from time to time (the “Plan”), for the benefit of its eligible
employees and their beneficiaries; and


WHEREAS, section 401(a)(9)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally requires the Plan to commence distribution
of a participant’s account balance by April 1 of the calendar year following the later of (i) the participant’s attainment
of age 701⁄2; or (ii) the participant’s termination of employment with the Company;


 


WHEREAS,
the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 amended Code section 401(a)(9) to permit defined contribution plans
such as the Plan to suspend required minimum distributions under Code section 401(a)(9) for the 2009 calendar year;


 


WHEREAS, the Plan must
be amended no later than the last day of the plan year commencing in 2011 to reflect the suspension of required minimum distributions
for the 2009 calendar year; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
now desires to amend the Plan in accordance with the power of amendment contained in the Plan effective as set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009, as follows:


1.


Section 5.12(c)
of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (ix) to read as follows:


 


		“(ix)	Required Minimum Distributions for 2009 - Notwithstanding
anything contained herein to the contrary, pursuant to Code Section 401(a)(9)(H), distributions required by this Section 5.12 were
made for the 2009 Plan Year. Furthermore, no portion of a distribution required under this Section 5.12 made to a Participant
or Designated beneficiary with respect to the 2009 Plan Year was treated as an Eligible Rollover Distribution for purposes of the
Direct Rollover option described in Section 5.18.”



 


2.


This Amendment No. 2 to the Plan shall
be effective as of the date set forth above. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
this Amendment No. 2 to be executed by its duly authorized corporate officers, and the Trustee has executed same and thereby accepted
the foregoing as of the effective date hereof.





	 	COMPANY:
	 	SOUTHWEST GEORGIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/DeWitt Drew
	 	Title: 	President and CEO
	 	 	 
	 	TRUSTEE:
	 	SOUTHWEST GEORGIA BANK
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Richard
    E. Holland
	 	Title: 	Vice President and Trust Officer
No. 11-6274.

#### Eddie Bigham, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 543,

181 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7898.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 63 So. 3d 748.
National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases

Historical Comparisons of Vaccine-Preventable Disease Morbidity in the U.S.

Comparison of Pre-Vaccine Era Estimated Annual 

Morbidity with Current Estimate: Vaccine-Preventable 

Diseases

Disease Pre-Vaccine Era Annual 

Estimate

2020 Estimate

(unless otherwise 

specified)

Percent 

Decrease

Hepatitis A 117,333 † 19,900 * 83%

Hepatitis B (acute) 66,232 † 14,000 * 79%

Pneumococcus (invasive) 

all ages 63,067 † 17,700 # 72%

< 5 years of age 16,069 † 600 # 96%

Rotavirus (hospitalizations, 

< 3 years of age)

Varicella

62,500 † †

4,085,120 † 

16,250 ##

26,919 ###

74%

99%

† JAMA. 2007;298(18):2155-2163

†† CDC. MMWR. February 6, 2009 / 58(RR02);1-25

* CDC. Viral Hepatitis Surveillance - United States, 2020 

# CDC. Unpublished, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance, 2020

## New Vaccine Surveillance Network 2021 data (unpublished); U.S. rotavirus disease now has biennial pattern

### CDC. Varicella Program 2021 data (unpublished, provisional and subject to change)

4/27/2023
PETER O’NEILL 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twentieth day of January 

1999 for his extraordinary leadership and support as the Industrial Management and Support 

Division Chief in the Material and Acquisition Management Integrated Process Unit and for his 

continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DISC from 1969 to 1996. Mr. 

O’Neill was responsible for the development, design and administration of such programs as the 

Blue Chip Vendor Program and the Automated Best Value Model. He was a driving force in 

establishing state of the art automation tools to reduce costs while maintaining the integrity in the 

operations of these programs. He worked in the Industrial Base Community from the Vietnam War 

to Operation Joint Endeavor, ensuring our fighting forces had the tools of the trade to do their job 

effectively. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/oneill.htm 1/21/2016
No. 11-6387.

#### Wilson Christopher Ortega, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,

181 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8166.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 10-10631.

#### Edward Williams, Petitioner v. Thomas Teodosio, et al.

565 U.S. 842, 132 S. Ct. 154,

181 L. Ed. 2d 70,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6054.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Farmers Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the twelve
month period ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         313,500
<SECURITIES>                                    66,558
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               861,034
<PP&E>                                         747,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 324,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,796,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          469,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,099,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,796,285
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,270,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,124,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,103,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   426,927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            676,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   676,973
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/ 
      Michael S.
      EganMichael
      S. EganChief
      Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 98-30607

____________

In The Matter Of: DAVID A. LYONS; GWENDOLYN W. LYONS,

Debtors

___________________

JOHN W LUSTER, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of David A.

Lyons and Gwendolyn W. Lyons,

Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. LYONS AND GWENDOLYN W. LYONS,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-2146)

April 12, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

REVERSED. See In re: Collins, No. 98-30605 (5th Cir. Apr. 5, 1999).
No. 11-6518.

#### Naarl Richard, Petitioner v. Detective Pritchard, et al.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 770,

181 L. Ed. 2d 495,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8513.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 271.
No. 11-5289.

#### Michael Fuller, Petitioner v. Gary C. Mohr, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.

565 U.S. 899, 132 S. Ct. 293,

181 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5732.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County, denied.
Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention/Agency for 

Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry (CDC/ATSDR) 

August 2021 Tribal Consultation 

AUGUST - 2021 

5THURSDAY

3:15-4:45 PM (EDT) 

3:15 PM Welcome and Opening Remarks 

from CDC/ATSDR 

3:20 PM Opening Prayer 

3:25 PM Overview of CDC/ATSDR Tribal 

Consultation Policy 

3:35 PM Input and Comments from 

Tribal Leaders 

4:30 PM Summary 

4:40 PM Closing Prayer 

4:45 PM Adjourn Meeting 

Agenda subject to change
# Az Európai Unió C 402A/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 402A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 65. évfolyam2022. október 19. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 402A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

65. évfolyam2022. október 19.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Európai Személyzeti Felvételi Hivatal (EPSO) |
| 2022/C 402 A/01 | Közlemény a nyílt versenyvizsga-felhívás függelékének módosításáról – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Dán (DA) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Görög (EL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Francia (FR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Horvát (HR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Lengyel (PL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) ( HL C 444 A., 2020.12.22. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Személyzeti Felvételi Hivatal (EPSO)

2022/C 402 A/01

Közlemény a nyílt versenyvizsga-felhívás függelékének módosításáról – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Dán (DA) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Görög (EL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Francia (FR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Horvát (HR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Lengyel (PL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) ( HL C 444 A., 2020.12.22. )

( HL C 444 A., 2020.12.22. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Személyzeti Felvételi Hivatal (EPSO)

| 2022.10.19. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2022.10.19.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 402/1

---

Közlemény a nyílt versenyvizsga-felhívás függelékének módosításáról – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Dán (DA) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Görög (EL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – Francia (FR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Horvát (HR) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Lengyel (PL) nyelvű jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) (1)

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 444 A., 2020. december 22.
  )

(2022/C 402 A/01)

A 7. oldalon a 6. pont utolsó albekezdése után a szöveg a következő bekezdéssel egészül ki:

| „7. | A 6. ponttól eltérve az EPSO/AD/376/20, az EPSO/AD/377/20 és az EPSO/AD/379/20 versenyvizsga esetében a készségvizsgáló szituációs interjú a vizsgabizottság két tagjával folytatott online találkozóból áll, amelynek során a vizsgabizottság két tagja minden egyes pályázóval interjút készít, figyeli és értékeli teljesítményüket, valamint pontozza a vizsgán felmért készségeket. A felvételi bizottság tagjain kívül más interjúztató nem lesz jelen. A 6. pont többi rendelkezése továbbra is alkalmazandó.” |
| --- | --- |

„7.

---

(1)  HL C 72. A, 2020.3.5..

1

---
CERTIFICATE OF STATE USE

(To support vendor’s claim for credit or payment under section 6427 of the Internal Revenue 

Code.)

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Name, Address, and Employer Identification Number of Vendor

The undersigned buyer (“Buyer”) hereby certifies the following under penalties of perjury:

A. Buyer will use the diesel fuel or kerosene to which this certificate relates for the exclusive use 

of a state or local government, or the District of Columbia.

B. This certificate applies to the following (complete as applicable):

1. If this is a single purchase certificate, check here _ and enter:

a. Invoice or delivery ticket number _______________________________________

b. Number of gallons __________________________________________________

2. If this is a certificate covering all purchases under a specified account or order number, check

here _ and enter:

a. Effective date ______________________________________________________

b. Expiration date _____________________________________________________

(period not to exceed 1 year after effective date)

c. Buyer’s account or order number _______________________________________

■ Buyer will provide a new certificate to the vendor if any information in this certificate changes.

■ If Buyer uses the diesel fuel or kerosene to which this certificate relates for a purpose other than 

stated in the certificate, Buyer will be liable for any tax.

■ Buyer acknowledges that it has not and will not claim any credit or payment for the diesel fuel 

or kerosene to which this certificate relates.

■ Buyer understands that the fraudulent use of this certificate may subject Buyer and all parties 

making such fraudulent use of this certificate to a fine or imprisonment, or both, together with the 

costs of prosecution.

________________________________________________________________________

Printed or typed name of person signing

________________________________________________________________________

Title of person signing

________________________________________________________________________

Name of Buyer

________________________________________________________________________

Employer identification number

________________________________________________________________________

Address of Buyer

________________________________________________________________________

Signature and date signed

DESC March 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

VINCULUM, INC., 

Petitioner

v.

GOLI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 682 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law by finding that [Petitioner]

proved the elements of its claim for breach of contract, and yet refusing to

enforce the nondiscretionary attorney's [sic] fees provision in the contract?

(2) Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law by sustaining [Respondent’s]

objections to questions at trial concerning profits beyond one-year

post-breach, and thereby imposing an arbitrary one-year limitation on

[Petitioner’s] damages?
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

TAN 525 STANDARD 57.44 6.28 13.51

1 3934A YELLOW LIMIT -1.10 -0.69 1.03 1.70

OLIVE 527 STANDARD 49.97 -0.31 19.51

2 3934H FULL GREEN 

LIMIT -0.95 -0.98 0.59 1.13

DARK 

GREEN

528

STANDARD 39.64 -3.36 13.55

3 3934D YELLOW LIMIT 0.74 -0.18 2.34 1.79

4 3934G FULL LIMIT -2.95 -0.70 -0.38 1.75

BROWN 

529 STANDARD 37.88 6.56 13.99

5 3934E THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 1.80 0.32 1.24 1.33

DARK 

CREAM

559

STANDARD 59.21 1.82 9.67

Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 6, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, WATERPROOF, FLAME 

RESISTANT, FREE EWOL GL/PD 12-19B

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3934

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting
6 3934B GREEN LIMIT -1.07 -0.92 2.00 2.27

LIGHT 

SAGE

560

STANDARD 53.65 0.95 13.93

7 3934C GREEN LIMIT 0.09 -1.04 0.34 1.36

BARK 

BROWN

561

STANDARD 26.49 5.05 3.70

8 3934F THIN ORANGE 

LIMIT 1.89 0.46 1.93 2.67

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
March 05, 2024 DLA-SM-23-3247

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR February 2024

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during February 2024. 

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 HC ST

LC ST

1,000 $1.29 M * 

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST 40 $345 K * 

Tin Amendment 001 MT NO

SALES

*If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld

F dditi l i f ti l t t i il t DLASt t i M t i l @dl il
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10180

Summary Calendar

FELIPE AGUIRRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:93-CR-69-A)

July 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WEINER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The appellant’s lengt hy delay in filing a notice of appeal

causes some uncertainty regarding appellate jurisdiction and

standard of review. In order to decide this case with dispatch, we

treat appellant’s appeal from the denial of his application under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 as though he were before this court as of right

and review the district court’s decisi on de novo. We find no

err or. United States v. Bailey , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), involved

the proper definition of the term “use” when applied to a2

defendant’s use of a firearm. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), upon which

the district court relied to impose a 2-level inc rease to

defendant’s sentence, turns on whether a dangerous weapon was

“possessed.” Comment 3 to this section provides that “[t]he

adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it

is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected w ith the

offense.” In this case, law enforcement officials found the

firearm at is sue at appellant’s residence together with over

$10,000 in cash. Some of the drug transactions forming the basis

for the indictment took place at appellant’s residence. Under such

circumstances, we find it decidedly less than “clearly improbable”

that appellant possessed the firearm in connection with his drug

offense. The district court committed no error in applying section

2D1.1(b)(1).

As appellant has briefed no other issue to this court, we

AFFIRM the judgment of the court below. We DENY the motion for the

appointment of counsel.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Defense Supply Center Columbus Environmental Management System Policy

In accordance with Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Instruction 4715.06, the DLA
Installation Management Columbus, Environmental Management Division has developed and
implemented an Environmental Management System (EMS). The EMS integrates missions,
activities, functions, contracts, and installation support agreements as a business practice for
improving overall performance for the Defense Supply Center Columbus (DSCC).

EMS is a vital supporting component of the DoD mission and is therefore the
responsibility of all DoD personnel. It requires active participation from all functions and
organizations at DSCC. While striving to manage environmental programs through the
implementation of an effective EMS we remain committed to:

a. Complying with all relevant environmental legislation, regulations, and other applicable
requirements.

b. Continual improvement in environmental program performance, measured through the
corrective action reports for any internal/ external review findings and environmental initiatives.

c. Identifying and employing source reduction, sustainable resource use, climate change
mitigation and adaptation, ecosystem protection, and pollution prevention opportunities where
practicable.

This policy will be given the widest dissemination throughout the installation and will be
available to the public upon request, through the Public Affairs Office.

For any questions, please feel free to contact the DLA Installation Management at
Columbus Environmental Management Division office at 614-692-8382.

FREELS.KRISTINeiueaiel
YA, xe: 2023.02.25 074101 -0500
KRISTINE FREELS
Site Director
DLA Installation Management Columbus
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1982

Lower Tribunal No. 19-1853CF

_____________________________

WILLARD LEO MCBRIDE,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County.

Scott Cupp, Judge.

May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Sharon M. Vollrath, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED