alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3144 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, as the ‘‘Jose Ramos 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ (for herself, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. COX of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. 

COSTA, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. 

JUDY CHU of California, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Ms. BASS, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mr. BERA, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. 

CORREA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. 

HARDER of California, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TED LIEU of 

California, Mr. TAKANO, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. HILL of California, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. HUFFMAN, 

Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. PETERS, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. WATERS, Mr. RUIZ, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. COOK, Ms. PORTER, Mr. NUNES, Mr. MCCARTHY, 

and Ms. PELOSI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, 

as the ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3144 IH

1 SECTION 1. JOSE RAMOS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whit4 tier, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AL F ON Z O H E C T ORP E NA , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 30363 D . C . N o . 9 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 0 0 4 - D WM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na D ona l d W . M ol l oy , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an d N . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l fonzo H ec t or P ena app ea l s f rom the 18 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d f o l l o w i n g h i s g u i l ty - p l e ac o n v i c t i o n f o rp o s s e s s i o n w i th i n t e n tt o s e l l o f 5 0 g r a ms o rm o r e o f

m e th a m p h e ta m in e , in v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . § § 8 4 6 a n d 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

OC T 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 30363 2 P e nac ont e nds tha thi s s e nt e nc e i s s ubs t a nt i ve l yunr e a s onabl e be c aus e the c a r e e rof f e nde re nha nc e m e ntunde rU . S . S . G . § 4B 1. 1( a ) ove r - r e pr e s e nt s the s e r i ous ne s s of

P e na ’ s pa s tof

f e ns e s a nd doe s nota c c ountf orthe na tur e a nd ci rc um st ance s of the offens e or P ena’ s hi st ory and char ac t er i st i cs . T he re cord re fl ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourtcorr ec t l y det erm i ned thatthe care eroffe nd er enhancem entappl i es , thati thas c on si dere d and addres se d al l of the fa ct ors s et f o rth in 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , a n d th a t it d idn o t o th e rw is e p r o c e d u r a llye rr . See U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d 9 8 4 , 9 9 1 - 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; see a l so U n ite d S ta tes v . D ia z -A r

g u e ta , 564 F . 3d 1047, 1051- 52 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . T he re cord further r ef

l ec t s that , un der the t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s, P ena’ s s ent ence is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 -52 (20 07 ); s e e a ls o U

n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 1-93 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
No. 10-10529.

#### Rick Kimbrel, Petitioner v. Patricia L. Caruso, et al.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 66,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6219.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19349]



[[Page 39113]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group Studying Small Businesses: How to Enhance and 
Encourage the Establishment of Pension Plans; Advisory Council on 
Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held Tuesday, August 11, 1998, of the Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working Group 
studying the obstacles to why small businesses are not establishing 
retirement vehicles for their employees when so many different savings 
arrangements are available. The Working Group also is focusing on how 
to encourage these businesses to establish such pension plans.
    The session will take place in Room N-4437 C&D, U.S. Department of 
Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 1:00 p.m. 
to approximately 4:00 p.m., is for Working Group members to continue 
taking testimony on the topic.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before August 4, 
1998, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be 
submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by August 4, at 
the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before August 4.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 15 day of July 1998.
Meredith Miller,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-19349 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
Exhibit 4.1







 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


June 24, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Dynamic Sector Income Trust,
Series 9


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Dynamic Sector Income Trust, Series 9 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on June 24, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-195820) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


 /s/
GERARDO CIPRIANO_______________ 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 1610 STANDARD 77.96 2.83 10.09

Tolerance

1 1

THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 81.86 2.87 13.73 3.90 0.04 3.64 3.47

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT February 11, 2019

Fabric Nomenclature BERET, WOOL A-A-55184

CR/PD 01-09

Shade Number WHITE 1610 Piece/Roll Number 18-06
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017,by and among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOANSERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Adminstrator, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_frileural_urnbadmanax_dist model_driastdials circles overlap_daicust te hrselev ratio depdepl phpdaseeppdvedplepvdelspl cisavcpop_ av size user_rcpt bldg_dwring1 aermod cb All_rcpts

01109NEI18383 3000 30 Y Y Y

06037NEI21201 3000 30 Y Y Y

06037NEI2CA124838 3000 30 Y Y Y

12057NEI26338 3000 30 Y Y 750 Y

18035NEI31400 3000 30 Y Y Y

18097NEI32182 3000 30 Y Y Y

22033NEILAT$10672 3000 30 Y Y Y

27037NEI34021 3000 30 Y Y Y

29087NEI34270 3000 30 Y Y Y

29093NEIMO0930005 3000 30 Y Y Y

36071NEI38394 3000 30 Y Y Y

42011NEI117 3000 30 Y Y Y

42011NEI40662 3000 30 Y Y Y

48085NEI6493 3000 30 Y Y Y

72013NEIPR01300001 3000 30 Y Y Y

Page 1
#### Ralph E. VIDAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 345, Docket 28446.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 12, 1964.

Decided March 23, 1964.

*629John E. Trecartin, New York City (O’Hagan & Reilly, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Jerome H. Shapiro, New York City (Gerald E. Dwyer and C. Austin White, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, SMITH, Circuit Judge, and LEVET, District Judge.*

*

 Sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly sustained during the course of his employment for the defendant railroad, the appellant, Ralph E. Vidal, brought this action in the District Court pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. After-a trial before the court without a jury, the District Court, Cooper, J., dismissed the complaint in an opinion incorporating the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, reported at 220 F.Supp. 922.

Plaintiff testified that, while engaged in sewing strips of heavy duty carpet in defendant’s upholstery shop, a clamp holding together the two portipns of the carpet being sewn slipped and caused him to fall backwards, whereupon he sustained the injuries of which he eom-plains.

The District Judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was negligent in failing to furnish appellant either a safe place to work, sufficient assistance or proper equipment. We cannot say these findings were clearly erroneous. Neither the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*nor the District Court’s prior denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of the plaintiff’s case compelled any other result.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Iris Grove Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 4, 2018
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40781 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARTIN GARZA, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 88

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Martin Garza, Jr. appeals his guilty plea conviction of one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Garza argues that the factual basis was insufficient to support his guilty plea conviction because the Government failed to meet its obligation to prove that he knew the type and quantity of drug involved in his offense. As Garza concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308

- 09 (5th Cir.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40781 Document: 00514305131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2018N o. 1 7

- 40781

2 2009 ). Garza’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-40781 Document: 00514305131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2018
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                ------------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                       -------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 2-98469, 33-15698, 33-38041,33-46997, 33-46998, 33-58159, 333-18671,
333-60735, 333-83207, and 333-57988) of Falcon Products, Inc., of our
reports dated December 17, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Falcon Products, Inc. incorporated by reference
or included in this Form 10-K for the year ended November 2, 2002.


/s/ERNST & YOUNG, LLP


St. Louis, Missouri,
January 24, 2003
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Donald J. Spence



 Exhibit 10.22 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 20, 2011, is made by and between Accellent Inc. (the “Company”) and Donald J. Spence (the
“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (collectively, the “Parties”)
are parties to an employment agreement dated as of April 23, 2010, with an Effective Date of May 24, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and 

WHEREAS, in recognition of market-related challenges the Executive is encountering in attempting to sell his current
principal residence, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to extend to December 31, 2012, the date by which the Executive is expected to complete the relocation of his principal residence to Michigan, and the Parties
further desire to maintain the Executive’s right to reimbursement of relocation-related costs specified in the Employment Agreement through such date. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein contained, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 

Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment Agreement. 

1. Amendment to Section 8(d)(ii). Section 8(d)(ii) is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence of such subsection
and inserting the following sentence in its place: 
 “Notwithstanding the provisions of this
Section 8(d)(ii), any amounts payable under this Section 8 that are subject to the execution of a release of claims by the Executive shall not be paid until the sixtieth (60th) calendar day after the date of termination of Executive’s employment, and then only if the Executive has in
fact executed and not revoked such release of claims, provided that if the 60 calendar day period (and any permitted revocation period thereafter, if applicable) as described in the foregoing begins in one calendar year and ends in a second calendar
year, then any payments under this Section 8 shall be delayed until the second of such two calendar years (regardless of whether Executive delivers the release in the first calendar year or in the second calendar year).” 

2. Amendment to Section 7(b). Section 7(b) is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “December 31, 2011”
in such section, and replacing it with “December 31, 2012.” 

  
 1 








 3. Ratification. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged
and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive. 
 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first set forth above. 

 

			
	Accellent Inc.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Kenneth W. Freeman
	Title:	 	Chairman
	
	Executive
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Donald J. Spence



  
 2
---

**Exhibit 32.1**

**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George Kazantzis, President (President and Principal Financial Officer) and Nicholas Pappas (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 24th day of February 2006.

/s/ George Kazantzis
  Name: George Kazantzis
  Title: President (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Nicholas Pappas
  Name: Nicholas Pappas
  Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)
No. 11-88.

#### Asid Mohamad, Individually and for the Estate of Azzam Rahim, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. Palestinian Authority, et al.

565 U.S. 962, 132 S. Ct. 454,

181 L. Ed. 2d 292,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7581.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted, and case is to be argued in tandem with No. 10-1491, Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., supra.

Same case below, 394 U.S. App. D.C. 277, 634 F.3d 604.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN D. NARDONE,

 Petitioner

 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 587 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether, in response to a police request for chemical testing

arising out of a D.U.I arrest, a motorist has a statutory right to

request alternative chemical testing under section 1547(i) of the

Motor Vehicle Code (75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1547(i))?

(2) If a motorist has a statutory right to request alternative chemical

testing under section 1547(i) of the Motor Vehicle Code when

arrested for a D.U.I., does section 1547 require that any such

request be conditioned upon the motorist having a medical

condition preventing him from undergoing the chemical test

requested by the police?

(3) Whether, in response to a police request for chemical testing

arising out of a D.U.I. arrest, a motorist's request for alternative

chemical testing, without more, constitutes a refusal to undergo

chemical testing under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1547(b)(1)?

DECIDED: December 11, 2014

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

141 2014
No. 11-5431.

#### Michael T. Green, Petitioner v. Michelle Rhee, et al.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 310,

181 L. Ed. 2d 190,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6161.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
No. 11-254.

#### Zhouqun Iris Wei, Petitioner v. Missouri Director of Revenue.

565 U.S. 945, 132 S. Ct. 425,

181 L. Ed. 2d 262,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7305.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District, denied.

Same case below, 335 S.W.3d 558.
No. 11-5037.

#### Juan Romero-Camacho, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 261,

181 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5385.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 471.