alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc.
(Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S. Steven Singh, as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the
Board of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 13, 2004



By

/s/ S. Steven SinghS. Steven SinghPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board




This certification accompanies
this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(1) Adjusting Price $19.52 CWT

(2) Base Price $20.39 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (0.87)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.07)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.04)

Price change per quart ($0.02) 

Price change per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price change per half pint ($0.00)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.07)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.04)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.02)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. 

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: July 4th, 2021
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.34. APPENDIX 8.34**

**REPLY TO CUSTOMER ASSET REPORT(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)**

AP3.34-2

2

APPENDIX 3.34

AP8.34-1

APPENDIX 8.34
EDWARD SCHWAMM 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twelfth day of December 

1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as an Inventory Management Specialist in the 

Directorate of Supply Operations and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout 

his tenure at DISC from 1983 to 1990. Mr. Schwamm was a systems pioneer who worked in 

conjunction with the DLA Central Design Agency employees to develop the Automated Inventory 

Management System (AIMS). Through his personal vision, he was able to convince the DLA 

information system community of the value of the growing new technology of Local Area 

Networking (LAN) as a means for bringing automation to the desktop. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/schwamm.htm 1/27/2016
(1) Adjusting Price 20.54 CWT

(2) Base Price 21.88 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (1.34)

(4) Price change per gallon (0.12)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon (0.06)

Price change per quart (0.03) 

Price change per pint (0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. (0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. (0.01)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) (0.01)

Price change per half pint (0.01)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (0.12)

Price adjustment per half gallon (0.06)

Price adjustment per quart (0.03)

Price adjustment per pint (0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. (0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. (0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) (0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint (0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. 

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Sept. 6, 2020
No. 11-6836.

#### Ronald Dawson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 594,

181 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8138.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 151.
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | 
| |  |  |  | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of MangaPets, Inc. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Rene Hamouth, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Rene Hamouth

Rene Hamouth

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 12th, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

EUSEBIO P. GONZALES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.  No. 01-1516 STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE;

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.

(CA-00-3557-S)

Submitted: January 31, 2002

Decided: February 20, 2002

Before WILKINS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Herbert R. O’Conor, III, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. J. Joseph

Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Cynthia Peltzman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Eusebio P. Gonzales, M.D., appeals the district court’s order granting the collective motion to dismiss of the State of Maryland and the

State of Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, and dismissing with prejudice Gonzales’ employment discrimination action

alleging disparate treatment, hostile work environment, retaliation,

civil conspiracy, and constructive discharge. The standard of review

for a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal is de novo. Korb v. Lehman, 919 F.2d

243, 246 (4th Cir. 1990). In general, such a dismissal should not be

granted unless it appears certain that the plaintiff can prove no set of

facts which would support his claim and entitle him to relief. In considering a motion to dismiss, the court should accept as true all wellpleaded allegations and should view the complaint in a light most

favorable to the plaintiff. See, e.g., De Sole v. United States, 947 F.2d

1169, 1171 (4th Cir. 1991). 

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the materials presented in the

joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion, and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Gonzales v. Maryland Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene, No. CA00-3557-S (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2 GONZALES v. STATE OF MARYLAND
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3282 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to establish a prize competition for 

the research, development, or commercialization of technology that would 

reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, including by capturing 

carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. 

CISNEROS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

MEEKS, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. SOTO, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Ms. WILD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to establish a prize 

competition for the research, development, or commercialization of technology that would reduce the amount 

of carbon in the atmosphere, including by capturing carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carbon Capture Prize 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3282 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIZE COMPETITION. 

2 (a) PRIZE COMPETITION.—The Secretary of Energy, 

3 individually or in cooperation with the heads of other Fed4 eral agencies, shall carry out a program pursuant to sec5 tion 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation 

6 Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) to award prizes competi7 tively to incentivize the research, development, or commer8 cialization of technology that reduces the amount of car9 bon dioxide in the atmosphere by direct carbon removal 

10 and permanent sequestration. 

11 (b) PRIZE AMOUNT.—In carrying out the program 

12 established under subsection (a), the Secretary may award 

13 not more than $30,000,000, in the aggregate, to the win14 ner or winners of the prize competition. 

15 (c) DEFINITION OF FEDERAL AGENCY.—In this sec16 tion, the term ‘‘Federal agency’’ has the meaning given 

17 the term under section 24(a)(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler 

18 Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719 

19 (a)(3)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date: November 7, 2005



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                            
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.                                                                
|Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,general partner of registrant
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE LUIS SANC HEZ-C O R TES, a .k.a . Jose L. C orte s, a .k.a . Jose Luis Sa nc he z , a .k.a . Jose L. Sa

nc he z C orte s , a .k.a . Jose Luis Sa nc h e z C orte z , Pe titione r, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 10-73486 Age n c y No. A098-249-001 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 12, 2014 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Luis Sa

nc he z -C o rte s, a

native an d c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for c a

nc e lla tion of re m ova l. 

# FIL ED JUN 17 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e hav e jurisdic tion under 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo que stions of la w. Garc ia v . Holde r , 659 F.3d 1261, 1265-66 (9th C i r. 2011). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The U.S. Supre m e C ourt’ s de c ision in Holde r v . Martine z Gutie r re z , 132 S. C t. 2011 (2012), fore c lose s Sa nc he z -C orte s’ s sole c onte ntion re ga rding im puta t ion of his period of c ontinuous re side nc e . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 0 - 7 3 4 8 6 2
If there were a 

vaccine against 

cancer, wouldn’t 

you get it for 

your kids?

HPV vaccine is

cancer prevention. 

Talk to the doctor 

about vaccinating

your 11–12 year old

sons and daughters 

against HPV.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens

Distributed by:
No. 11-6938.

#### Steven J. Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1046, 132 S. Ct. 600,

181 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8214.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 891.
Adult Immunization Schedule By Age												
																						
																					
											
											Syndication code for the Adult Immunization Schedule has been updated.
												  Please go to CDC’s **Public Health Media Library** page to copy and paste the updated embed code to your website.

			
							
			
			
			
			
 
      Page last reviewed:  February 9, 2023						
						Content
							source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
```

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 10, 2004

                                           /S/           GARY L. CLARK
                                          -----------------------------------
                                                    Gary L. Clark
                                               Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
No. 11-6055.

#### Benjamin Roberson, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 507,

181 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7779.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 61 So. 3d 204.
No. 11-6608.

#### Joel Martinez, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 775,

181 L. Ed. 2d 497,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8655.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5346.

#### Benjamin F. Shipley, Jr., Petitioner v. Woolrich, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 300,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5569.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 4.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20301]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, August 3, 1998.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: July 24, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-20301 Filed 7-24-98; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
It’s Your Future. 

You Can Protect It.

Always use a condom and 

another form of birth control.

Girls and Guys, if you are sexually active, protect yourself and your partner 

from pregnancy, HIV, and other STDs. Even if you or your partner is using 

another type of birth control, agree to use a condom EVERY TIME you have 

sex, to reduce the risk to both of you for HIV and most other STDs. Birth 

control (such as the pill, patch, ring, implant, shot, or an IUD) provides 

highly effective pregnancy prevention, but it does not protect you from HIV 

and other STDs. Condoms can reduce the risk to both of you for most STDs, 

including HIV, as well as the risk for pregnancy. Be prepared. 

+

the pill

patch 

ring

 implant 

shot

 or IUD

=

EVERY TIME 

to reduce 

the risk of 

pregnancy, HIV, 

and other STDs

Talk to your partner. If you 

have sex, make sure you 

both agree to use a condom 

and a more effective type of 

birth control every time.

Condoms need to be used 

the right way, every time 

you have sex. So use both a 

condom AND a highly effective 

method of birth control every 

time you have sex.

And remember, when you 

get right down to it, the 

only sure way to prevent 

pregnancy, HIV, and other 

STDs is not to have sex. 

www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/Teens.html

Get involved, make your voice heard! 

www.engage.findyouthinfo.gov

Learn about talking to your partner.

www.takestwoapp.org www.sexetc.org www.stayteen.org

Learn to use condoms the right way, every time.

www.itsyoursexlife.com/gyt/condoms/

Learn about all birth control methods.

www.stayteen.org/birth-control-101

Find a Clinic www.hhs.gov/opa

CS248705-A
No. 11-400.

#### Florida, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

565 U.S. 1033, 132 S. Ct. 604,

181 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8225.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1235.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP2.15, APPENDIX 2.15**

**INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT - PHYSICAL INVENTORY ERROR CLASSIFICATION CODES**

AP2.15.1.  PURPOSE

	AP2.15.1.1.  The physical inventory program error classification codes provide a standard means for Components to classify the causes of actual/potential adjustments for subsequent analysis, evaluation, and corrective action.

	AP2.15.1.2.  The error classification code is a required entry on MILSTRAP documentation for use in preparing reports and for providing evaluation data to higher authority in standard error classification categories.

AP2.15.2.  CODE STRUCTURE

	AP2.15.2.1.  First Position.  The first character is the operation code which shall be numeric or alphabetic and shall identify the operation during which the error occurred and not the operation in which the error was detected.  Code assignment for the first character is controlled by DoD and may not be assigned by the Components.  The following operation codes are assigned as the first character in the error classification code:

	AP2.15.2.2.  Second Position.  The second character is the type of error code which is alphabetic or numeric and identifies the type of error which occurred.  Code assignment for the second character is controlled by DoD and may not be assigned by the Services/ Agencies.  The following type of error codes are assigned as the second character in the error classification code:

### 	AP2.15.2.3.  Third Position.  The third character may be assigned by each Component to internally amplify the error classification.  Numeric and alphabetic code assignments in this position will be controlled by each individual Component for their internal use.

4

**AP2.16-**

AP2.15-1	APPENDIX 2.15