alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NICHOLAS J. RANALLI

Is being inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this twenty-third day of 

October 2001 for his continuous outstanding mission support from 1976 through 1999. Mr. Ranalli 

was a superb leader, innovator, and visionary who maintained extraordinary relationships with the 

DISC workforce. He was responsible for the successful negotiation of the alternate work schedule, 

and developed courses for managers and union representatives which significantly improved 

management and labor relations. As the first civilian Administrator of DISC, he was instrumental in 

the successful merge of DISC and DSCP. Under his guidance and leadership, about 1,300 DISC 

employees were successfully placed in the new organization. Mr. Ranalli’s achievements in 

reengineering business processes have significantly impacted the way DSCP and the Defense 

Logistics Agency conduct business today, and positions DSCP for a leadership role into the 21st 

century. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/ranalli.htm 1/21/2016
Partnering for Vaccine Equity (P4VE)

Program Overview

The P4VE program aims to increase vaccine equity* in racial and ethnic 

minority communities by providing:

Support for national, state, local and community-based organizations that 

implement activities focused on vaccine awareness, access, availability, and confidence 

in disproportionally affected adult populations.

A learning community, resource repository, and data technical assistance that 

support partners with webinars, tailored resources, coaching, peer-to-peer informationsharing, and more.

National communications disseminating vaccine information, addressing mis- and disinformation, and building vaccine confidence.

Since 2020, the program has engaged over 500 national, state, and local 

partners, including:

Partner 

Network

64 state, territorial, local, and 

tribal immunization programs 

($6.7B in fiscal year 2021)

Supporting local health departments 

and community-based organizations

National Association of Community Health 

Centers (NACHC) and National Association of 

County and City Health Officials (NACCHO)

($18M in fiscal year 2021)

Funding and partnering with local health 

departments and community health centers

4 minority-led medical and 

professional associations 

($8.9M in fiscal year 2021-2022)

Supporting medical professionals and 

providers with tools and resources

The Association of Immunization 

Managers and Racial and Ethnic 

Approaches to Community Health 

(REACH) participants 

($26.7M in fiscal year 2021)

Funding and technical assistance support for 38 

local and community partners and Jurisdictions

5 evaluation-focused institutions 

($36.9M in fiscal year 2021-2022)

Building an evidence base for vaccine equity Funding six social media partners to 

mitigate vaccine mis- and disinformation

3 national organizations funding 

community-based organizations 

($69.9M in fiscal year 2021-2022)

Funding and partnering with over 200 

community-based organizations (CBOs)

8 national organizations 

funding local affiliates ($58M in 

fiscal year 2021-2022) 

Funding and partnering with 100+ affiliated 

organizations, branches, and chapters

2 national organizations fund 

social media partners**

($21M in fiscal year 2021-2022) 

Funding as of September 2022

*Vaccine Equity defined as everyone having fair and just access to vaccination.

**2 organizations from the broader national organization funding mechanisms fund 

social media partners in addition to other CBOs and affiliates 

Last Updated 9/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3333 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3333

  To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the United States 
   Postal Service to receive approval from local governments before 
          relocating any post office, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2019

    Mr. Collins of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the United States 
   Postal Service to receive approval from local governments before 
          relocating any post office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Post Office Act''.

SEC. 2. SECTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) In addition to the requirements of subsection (d), before 
relocating any post office, the Postal Service--
            ``(1) shall provide a period of not less than 30 days for 
        comment from the governments of the town and county, or if 
        there are no such governments, the government of the State, in 
        which the post office is located;
            ``(2) provide to such governments a list, not to be made 
        available to the public, of each proposed relocation site; and
            ``(3) may not relocate such post office without receiving 
        prior written approval from such governments with respect to 
        such relocation and the site proposed for such relocation.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any post office proposed for relocation on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2012________-NM-___031______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

United States Space Force
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

United States Space Force

USSF was established 

on 20 Dec, 2019 

Current uniform program 

operates out of 

Headquarters 

(Pentagon) and 

collaborates closely with 

the Air Force Uniform 

Office 

Uniform program is still 

developing, evolving, 

and growing 
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

Growing and Evolving

On May 16, 2022, the USSF signed a 

historic Memorandum of Understanding 

with the Air Force Life Cycle Management 

Center’s Agile Combat Support (ACS) 

which:

• Formally outlines responsibilities 

related to the design, 

development, and sustainment of 

U.S. Space Force uniforms 

• Signifies the close partnership 

between the U.S. Space Force 

and the directorate 

• Represents a milestone 

achievement in the continued 

growth and development of the 

U.S. Space Force 

• Established the Program 

Director’s position 
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

USSF Uniform Program Director’s 

Office 

Office located in Dayton, Ohio at WrightPatterson Air Force Base 

Currently has a Director and will be hiring a 

Designer, and two logistics specialists in late 

2022 

USSF is investing $1.1 million into the uniform 

program in FY23
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

USSF Uniform Focus

The USSF is focusing on the creation, development and fielding of 

a variety of Uniform items to deliver to Guardians as quickly as 

possible. 

Current Uniform Item Efforts:

• Service Dress

• Physical Training (PT) Gear 

• Class B

• Sweater 

• Hat 

• Tie/ Tie-Tab

• Outerwear 

• Maternity Dress

*All uniform Items are currently tracking a late 2025 fielding date*
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

USSF Service Dress Projected 

Timeline

Program Milestones

Funding Required

Decision Point/Deliverable

Manpower

Fielding

2 Jun 2022 - Fit test location approval 

(WPAFB Only)

8 April – Finalize Requirement

Aug - Oct 2022 Fit test production

4 Nov 2022 - Wear test locations & 

special participant list

Oct – Nov 2022 Conduct Fit Test

29 May – 16 Jun 2023 

Final Approval

Apr 2023 – Conduct 

Wear Test

Jan – Mar 2023 Wear 

Test Production

July 2025

DLA Fielding
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

Physical Training (PT) Projected 

Timeline

Wear Testing

Package Delivery

Approval

Fielding 

August 16-17, 2021 

Wear Test WPAFB

August 3-5, 2021

Wear Test Peterson SFB

August 3 - September 13 

Wear Testing duration

February 17, 2022

DLA Package Delivery 

June 2024

Est. Field Date

October 28, 2021

Approval of final PT samples 
AFLCMC... Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

Questions? 

POC Title Email

Ms. Catherine 

Lovelady

Management Analyst within 

the SF/DS’s Change 

Management Team 

Catherine.lovelady@spaceforce

.mil

Ms. Tracy Roan Chief of the Air Force 

Uniform Office 

Tracy.roan.1@us.af.mil
NUMBER 13-17-00454-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, INC., Appellant,

v.

JESUS CHARNICHART AND 

FRANCISCA CHARNICHART, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant, Investment Retrievers, Inc., filed an appeal from a judgment entered by 

the County Court at Law No. 3 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2016-CCL00980. Appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal on grounds that it no longer 

wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court withdraw the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

16th day of November, 2017.
No. 11-6635.

#### Riccardo Tolliver, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 537,

181 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7685.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*377Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 448.
No. 11-5073.

#### Edward F. Kinane, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 1036, 132 S. Ct. 574,

181 L. Ed. 2d 424,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8285.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 12 A.3d 23.
Exhibit 32.2




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,
the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 7, 2004



/s/ Bruce M. Johnson
----------------------------
Bruce M. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3340 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3340

To provide a set-aside of funds for Indian populations under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                 Security Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2019

  Mr. Gomez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a set-aside of funds for Indian populations under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                 Security Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Healthcare Careers Act''.

SEC. 2. SET-ASIDE OF FUNDS FOR INDIAN POPULATIONS.

    Section 2008(c)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1397g(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``15 percent of which for each 
fiscal year shall be reserved for grants to Indian tribes, tribal 
organizations, and Tribal Colleges and Universities'' before the 
period.

SEC. 3. GUARANTEE OF GRANTS FOR INDIAN POPULATIONS.

    Section 2008(a)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1397(a)(2)(C)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(C) Guarantee of grants for indian populations.--
                The Secretary shall award at least 10 grants under this 
                subsection to an eligible entity that is an Indian 
                tribe, a tribal organization, or a Tribal College or 
                University, to the extent there are a sufficient number 
                of applications submitted by such an eligible entity 
                that meet the requirements of subparagraph (B).''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2019.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of California, Davis; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 98-026. Applicant: University of California, Davis, 
Davis, CA 95616. Instrument: Optical Imaging System, Model ORA 2001. 
Manufacturer: Optical Imaging, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice 
at 63 FR 31737, June 10, 1998.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides ability to 
perform optical imaging to map brain activity in laboratory animals. 
The National Institutes of Health advises in its memorandum dated June 
8, 1998 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or 
apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for 
the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-19903 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

July 22, 1998.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-2567-009.
    c. Date Filed: June 18, 1998.
    d. Applicant: Northern States Power Company--Wisconsin.
    e. Name of Project: Wissota Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Chippewa River in Chippewa County, Wisconsin.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Chris M. Olson, Northern States Power 
Company, 100 North Barstow Street, P.O. Box 8, Eau Claire, WI 54702, 
(715) 836-1053.
    i. FERC Contact: Mark Pawlowski (202) 219-2795.
    j. Comment Date: Within 60 days of the notice issuance date.
    k. Description of Project: The existing project would consist of: 
(1) six earthen embankments and a 165 foot-long gravity dam; (2) a 
6,212-acre reservoir; (3) a powerhouse containing 6 vertical turbine-
generator units for a total installed capacity of 36,000 kW; (4) a 
transmission line; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The average annual 
energy generation is 149,392,471 kWh.
    1. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the 
WISCONSIN STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by 
Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36, CFR, at Sec. 800.4
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes 
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to 
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the 
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person 
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60 
days from the comment date and serve a copy of the request on the 
applicant.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20099 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, DC, and eight Territories†, 2010

§ Chicago, IL (47%);

District of Columbia (120%);

Houston, TX (62%); 

New York City, NY (121%); 

Philadelphia, PA (115%); 

San Antonio, TX (88%).

† American Samoa (no report);

Marshall Islands (75%);

Federated States of Micronesia (105%);

Guam (52%);

N. Mariana Islands (113%);

Palau (no report);

Puerto Rico (93%);

Virgin Islands (No IIS).

National Coverage: 82% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2010 IISAR

no IIS/no report

0% - 33%

34% - 66%

67% - 94%

95%+
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTELLA M. GUILLEN, an individual,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 and

VICTOR M. LEMUS, an individual,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

TRUSTEE; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15001

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00704-RLHPAL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Roger L. Hunt, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

FILED

DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15001

Estella M. Guillen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action arising out of a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th

Cir. 1986). We affirm. 

Guillen’s contention that the district court dismissed the action without due

process is unpersuasive where the record indicates that she filed an opposition and

was provided a hearing on the motion to dismiss. See S.E.C. v. McCarthy, 322

F.3d 650, 659 (9th Cir. 2003) (due process requires notice and an opportunity to be

heard). 

To the extent the opening brief offers any specific arguments about the

dismissal of Guillen’s claims, we do not consider them because she did not include

the relevant hearing transcript in the record on appeal. See Portland Feminist

Women’s Health Ctr. v. Advocates for Life, Inc., 877 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1989)

(“When an appellant fails to supply a transcript of a district court proceeding, we

may . . . refuse to consider the appellant’s argument.”); see also Miller v. Fairchild

Indus., Inc., 797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir. 1986) (“The Court of Appeals will not

ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued

in appellant’s opening brief.”). 

AFFIRMED.
No. 11-6183.

#### In re Samuel Rivera, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 552,

181 L. Ed. 2d 417,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7971,

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
1 John T. Boyd, Chi ef Justice (R et.), Se venth Co urt of Appeals, si tting by

assignment. NO. 07-04-0027-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E APRIL 8, 2004

______________________________ GERALD BARROW , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 1 08TH DI STRICT COURT OF PO TTER CO UNTY; NO. 29,237-E; H ONORABLE ABE LO PEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. 1
MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Gerald Ba rrow, an inm ate pro ceedin g pro se , filed a purported notice of appeal on J anuary 22, 2004, se eking rev iew of his conviction for deliver y of a control led2 Appellant may ha ve recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus w ith the clerkof the court in w hich the conv iction was obtained and be r eturnable tothe Court of Criminal Appeals for consi deration of an out-of-time appeal

. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.07 (Vernon Su pp. 2004). 2 substance. He asserts he was convicted in 1989 or 1990. W e dismiss for w ant of jurisdict ion. A defendant must file a w ritten notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within the deadlines provided in Rule 2 6.2(a)(1) of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Pr ocedure. The rules provide for

a 15 day ex

tension in w hich to file the notice if a motion for extension of time in compliance with Rule 10.5(b)(2) is filed in this Court . Tex. R. A pp. P. 26.3(b). The Court is wi thout jurisdi ction to addres s the merits of an appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss

the appeal if an appeal i s not timely perfected. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998). Appellan t’s purported notice of ap peal by which he challenges a 15 year ol d convicti on is untimely and does not inv

oke our juri sdiction. Accordingl y, the purpor ted appeal is di smissed for want of jurisdic tion. 2
Don H. Reavis Justice
# Table 1a

&A	

&F	&P	

# Table 1b

# Table 2a

# Table 2b

# Table 3a

# Table 3b

# Table 4a

# Table 4b

# Table 4c

# Table 4d