alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mrs. Chestella Alvis HUDEL, Individually and as natural tutrix of the minors, Mary Ann Hudel, Nancy Jane Hudel and Joan Theresa Hudel, et al., Appellees.

No. 21013.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 12, 1964.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1964.

Maurice J. Wilson, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant, The Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

David W. Robinson, Horace C. Lane, Watson, Blanche, Wilson, Posner & Thibaut, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee, Mrs. Chestella Alvis Hudel.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the appellant negligent in relation to the maintenance of the crossing at which the accident occurred. The question of the contributory negligence of the decedent presented fact issues which were resolved by the jury. Finding no error in the charge, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court must be

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, Thomas M. Crowder, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                   |  |  |  |                             |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas M. Crowder       |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Thomas M. Crowder           |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President    |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | and Chief Financial Officer |  | 



41
No. 10-7575.

#### James Gaston, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1015,

178 L. Ed. 2d 842,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 864.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 398 Ill. App. 3d 1101, 370 Ill. Dec. 767, 988 N.E.2d 1123.
+]2]3]4]5]6]7] |2]2]2]212]212| |4]+]<]4]415]5]5]51515]515/51516|6]6|6|616]6[e|e|ei7|7/717|7|7|7|7/717/8] 7 TOTAL PRICE 2 SHIP FROM 3, SHIP TO
3}4|5/6]718}9| |5]6}7)/8/9]0|1|2|314|5|6|7/ 8/9] 0 112/3|4|5}6]7}8/9/0| 1]2/314|5|6|718)9|0 hte 6096 IsGP180
DI|_R Ur}auantiry| -> SUPPLE. |S] F | DIS) |PRO-| P |RDD| A| RI [OC]M) | ONITPRICE | DOLLARS | CTS
Be frou] 3 Sasa eV | U RIERA E | folsh) boon
N T Ri D | TION D &| D RS CTS
4, MARK FOR DEMIL A HW
AST EA00003 SGP180AZB NA SH {0000001 003 | r76n62588000
ee 5.00 DATE |6 NMFC 7 FRT RATE & TYPE CARGO a PS
Ey . 8136
3 =
: : Ma | [| | il [| | | | | | ll | | lll ie i _ “
Elz 8
fi 2 E ! 76, FREIGHT CLASSIFICATION NO TURE,
é, IFA MENCLA
2 3 2 N660968136A28AA WASTE FORMALIN, NOT SUBJECT TO ADR, EWC 140603*
/
s
Sis 77 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
E INON- CONTROLLEDMEDI CALNON - REG
Blz"s 1& TY CONT ]19. NO CONT 20. TOTAL WEIGHT 21 TOTAL CUBE
ZoN8
mo2s 3 32 K
& S59 6505DSMEDWNON 5 aise
fe]
gles ‘<4 { MAT Fane
od -
i PACKAGING EQUALS/EXCEEDS DOT 49 CFR 170 - 189 SEE LINE 9
i SHIP PROM: US NAVAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL WARBHOUSE
aleganes PSC 827 BOX 1000
Bisssass FPO AE 09617-1000
Blogesks .
Blesezes
WIS ogS SHIP TO: DLA DISPOSITION SERVICES
= 0.01 DLA DISP SVCS AVIANO ITALY
a UNIT 6215 DRMO ALAJ
al] STATE wasTE copes: 140603 APO AE 09604-0000
mS J CERTIFY THAT THIS PROPERTY IS PROPERLY CLASSIFIED, DESCRIBED
< |S DRUM NUMBERS: ol 02 03 PACKAGED, MARKED AND LABELED IAW THE FGS FOR ITALY
ram
3/5
= BRA CODES: NONE EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBERS MARCO MENAPRO 3146296764
=
12 crim; n16600 Acc Start Date: 05/16/18 Rec Manifest Number Contract No.: SP452015D0090
Ols wes: Nesogeazena BUILDING NUMBER: Type Operation: LABORATORY OPERATION ORG CODE
WIS UNIT PRICE: $1.01 TOTAL DISPOSAL COST: $32 32 BILL To DoDAAC: N66096
2 This is an APPROVED ETID generated document (SYUP410)

DIAN cated eee

DIO sensnnanserernmtemrnnanrenn

LINE. ..ncnmneeneuntannernn
# Europeiska unionens C 402A/19 o

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 402A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 65 årgången19 oktober 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 402A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

65 årgången19 oktober 2022

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso) |
| 2022/C 402 A/01 | Meddelande om ändring av tillägg till meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/375/20 – Danskspråkiga (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/376/20 – Grekiskspråkiga (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/377/20 – Franskspråkiga (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/378/20 – Kroatiskspråkiga (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/379/20 – Polskspråkiga (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 444 A, 22.12.2020 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso)

2022/C 402 A/01

Meddelande om ändring av tillägg till meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/375/20 – Danskspråkiga (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/376/20 – Grekiskspråkiga (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/377/20 – Franskspråkiga (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/378/20 – Kroatiskspråkiga (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/379/20 – Polskspråkiga (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

( EUT C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso)

| 19.10.2022 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2022

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 402/1

---

Meddelande om ändring av tillägg till meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/375/20 – Danskspråkiga (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/376/20 – Grekiskspråkiga (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/377/20 – Franskspråkiga (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/378/20 – Kroatiskspråkiga (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/379/20 – Polskspråkiga (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7) (1)

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 444 A av den 22 december 2020
  )

(2022/C 402 A/01)

På sidan 7 efter punkt 6 sista stycket ska följande punkt läggas till:

| ”7. | Genom undantag från punkt 6 ska förfarandet för den situationsbaserade intervjun för uttagningsproven Epso/AD/376/20, Epso/AD/377/20 och Epso/AD/379/20 bestå av ett onlinemöte med två medlemmar i uttagningskommittén som kommer att intervjua, observera och bedöma varje sökandes prestationer och poängsätta de kompetenser som ingår i provet. Ingen annan intervjuare kommer att närvara utöver medlemmarna i uttagningskommittén. Övriga bestämmelser i punkt 6 är fortsatt tillämpliga.” |
| --- | --- |

”7.

---

(1)  EUT C 72 A, 5.3.2020.

1

---
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


For Immunization Managers


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








COVID-19 Vaccination  Coverage and Vaccine Confidence Among Children						Print
																Related Pages
					COVIDVaxViewDownload Data Table | Back to COVIDVaxView main page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  November 3, 2021						Source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeCOVIDVaxView Home
COVIDVaxView Interactive!plus icon
Weekly Dashboardplus icon
Child
Adult
Pregnant Persons
Monthly Dashboardplus icon
Adults
Children
Data Sources
Publications
COVID-19 Vaccination Mapping Tool


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.52 CWT 0.965 $6.2918

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5217 LB 3.5 $8.8260

Class I Price $15.1178

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.42 CWT 0.965 $6.1953

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5286 LB 3.5 $8.8501

Class I Price $15.0454

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.0724

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0062

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0031

Price change per quart $0.0016

Price change per pint $0.0008

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0006

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0005

Price change per half pint $0.0004

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Jan. 6, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          37,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,100
<PP&E>                                       1,572,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,387,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,300
<BONDS>                                        784,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     570,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,387,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Broward Davis, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

*W. E. B. Smith,*of Marianna, Florida, for Plaintiff in Error;

*J. B. Johnson,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Garter,*Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Decision Filed May 11, 1926.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and arguments of counsel for *893the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March  31,  2005  of  the  Company  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2005

                                       /S/        ROBERT E. MANNE
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                                  Robert E. Manne
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
No. 11-6538.

#### Orlando Cruz, Petitioner v. James McGrady, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 590,

181 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8234.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-61796 and 333-87160) of EMS Technologies, Inc.
of our report dated February 6, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd. incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of EMS Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2003.


March 15, 2004                                             Ernst & Young LLP
Ottawa, Canada                                             Chartered Accountants
No. 11-6313.

#### In re Theodore Shove, et al., Petitioners.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 441,

181 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7170,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 25, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-15819

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00067-CV-RWS-2

GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,

CHESTER VALLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

RIVER’S EDGE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(May 25, 2010)

Before BLACK, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the briefs on appeal and the record in this case. 

We have had the benefit of oral argument. Our resolution of this case has adhered
strictly to the particular arguments asserted on appeal by appellants. We also note

that the record in this case is deficient; the primary record evidence relied upon by

appellants for crucial elements of its proof is a survey of pharmacists, which was

flawed in several respects, including in particular that the survey did not describe

actual advertisements at issue or reveal the fact that none of the drugs involved was

either approved by FDA or required to be approved. After careful deliberation, and

on the basis of the limited record in this case, and addressing only the particular

arguments raised by the appellants on appeal, we cannot conclude that the district

court committed reversible error.1

For these limited reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Although we have some concern about the application of Georgia law, appellants 1

have failed to articulate a persuasive argument challenging the district court in this regard. 

Limiting ourselves to appellants’ particular arguments on appeal, we decline to disturb the

district court’s ruling. We do note that the district court’s opinion clearly could have no

persuasive or preclusive value in a case not involving Georgia law.

2
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

TAN 525 STANDARD 58.45 5.67 15.85

OLIVE 527 STANDARD 50.40 -0.60 20.23

DARK 

GREEN

528

STANDARD 39.75 -3.87 14.30

1 3937C FULL BLUE 

LIMIT -2.23 -0.03 -1.39 1.55

2 3937F YELLOW LIMIT -0.76 -0.25 2.19 1.62

BROWN 

529 STANDARD 36.96 5.29 13.94

3 3937A ORANGE LIMIT 0.77 1.14 1.60 1.55

4 3937B FULL LIMIT -3.03 0.14 -0.10 2.06

5 3937E FULL GREEN 

LIMIT -2.08 0.41 1.05 1.39

6 3937G THIN RED LIMIT 2.05 1.34 -0.17 2.25

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3937

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT March 22, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, DUCK, TEXTURED NYLON, 330 

DENIER MIL-DTL-32439

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
DARK 

CREAM

559

STANDARD 62.70 1.78 13.14

LIGHT 

SAGE

560

STANDARD 53.36 0.48 15.36

7 3937D FULL VIOLET 

LIMIT -1.02 0.59 -0.75 1.00

BARK 

BROWN

561

STANDARD 26.67 4.21 3.44

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
No. 11-147.

#### Keith A. Nordgulen, Petitioner v. American Family Mutual Insurance, et al.

565 U.S. 943, 132 S. Ct. 404,

181 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7298.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I, denied.

Same case below, 330 Wis. 2d 835, 794 N.W.2d 928.
No. 11-6227.

#### Charles W. Hampton, Petitioner v. J.W. Squire Co., Inc.

565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 571,

181 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8009.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 28, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 11-6235.

#### Jose Bermudez, Petitioner v. James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, et al.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 519,

181 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7835.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00185-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.D., a Child

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-00958

Honorable Kevin Henderson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial 

court is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are not assessed against appellant because he qualifies as 

indigent.

SIGNED September 13, 2024.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
### Re: Requesting data on palm oil production processes **Achmad Rachman** to : Aaron Levy
From: Achmad Rachman <attani@embassyofindonesia.org> To: Aaron Levy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 5/31/2011 12:53pm Dear Levy Aaron, I response to your previous email, I received some figures as I wrote down below

- What percent of palm oil mills in Indonesia are currently capturing POME biogas? ------ 3.5%

- What percent are in the process of constructing projects to capture POME biogas? ---- 2%

- What percent are planning to construct POME biogas capture projects between now and the 2022? --- depends on CER price after 2012 Kyoto Protocol

- Of the mills that currently capture POME biogas, what percent use covered lagoons and what percent use closed tank digesters? -- all projects use lagoons covered

- Of the mills that currently capture POME biogas, how are they using the biogas? For example, is it flared, used for electricity, used for steam or used for electricity and steam? -- all used for electricity Regards, Achmad Rachman

-- Achmad Rachman, Ph.D Agricultural Attache Embassy of Indonesia 2020 Massachusetts Avenue, NWWashington, D.C. 20036

Phone: (202)775 - 5340/5341
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT May 31, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature NECK DAM, CHEMICAL PROTECTIVE, 41% NOMEX N303, 35% 

MODACRYLIC, 24% COTTON

Shade Number FOLIAGE GREEN 504 Piece/Roll Number 3774

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3774 33.89 -2.32 2.07

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SAMPLES READ 2 TIMES AND 

AVERAGED