alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                Date:   November 12, 2004

                      /s/ Michael S. Egan
                      -----------------------
                      Michael S. Egan
                      Chief Executive Officer




                                       53
H. R. 3329 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5186 Benito 

Street in Montclair, California, as the ‘‘Paul Eaton Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PAUL EATON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5186 Benito Street in Montclair, California, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Paul Eaton Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Paul Eaton Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 11-5487.

#### Orlando O. Ocasio, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 910, 132 S. Ct. 318,

181 L. Ed. 2d 196,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5754.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, denied.

*197Same case below, 81 App. Div. 3d 1469, 917 N.Y.S.2d 803.
Exhibit 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain Communications
Corporation (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ashutosh RoyAshutosh RoyChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-284.

#### Niels H. Lauersen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 959, 132 S. Ct. 431,

181 L. Ed. 2d 288,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7178.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 115.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Spine Pain Management, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William F. Donovan, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 15, 2010
            By:
            /s/ William F. Donovan,
  M.D.William
      F. Donovan, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer
Field Name    				Length  
------------  				--------
MODE_CD_4735      			VAR/DLM(|)
RQMT_RPY_INST_2648			VAR/DLM(|)
NBR_OF_TBLS_4444  			VAR/DLM(|)
PRT_SKLTN_1_4445  			VAR/DLM(|)
PRT_SKLTN_2_4446  			VAR/DLM(|)			
PRT_SKLTN_3_4447  			CHAR(1)
No. 11-5658.

#### Scott Schirmann Creech, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 918, 132 S. Ct. 338,

181 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6175.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Certificate 

# of (participation T liis ce rt i f ic ate is awarded to AARTill SCOTI
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 10, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before August 17, 
1998 to be assured of consideration.

Departmental Offices/International Trade Data System (ITDS) Office

    OMB Number: 1505-0162.
    Form Number: Forms CF-3461, CF-3461-ALT, CF-7501, CF-7512 and CF-
7533.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: North American Trade Automation Prototype (NATAP) Data.
    Description: The requested data is from volunteer trading community 
participants in the prototype test with the United States, Canada, and 
Mexico to improve the electronic exchange of data in the execution of 
North American land border commercial trade transactions.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 120.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 3 minutes, 30 seconds.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 3,758 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland (202) 622-1563, Departmental 
Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19053 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
Meningococcal Vaccines 

for Preteens and Teens

All preteens and teens should get vaccines to protect 

against meningococcal disease. Talk with your child’s 

doctor or nurse about meningococcal vaccination to help 

protect your child’s health.

Why does my child 

need meningococcal 

vaccines?

Meningococcal vaccines help protect against the bacteria that cause meningococcal disease. Meningococcal 

disease can refer to any illness caused by a type of bacteria called Neisseria meningitidis. Meningococcal 

disease is not very common in the United States, but teens and young adults are at increased risk.

The two most common types of illnesses include infections of the 

• Lining of the brain and spinal cord (meningitis) 

• Bloodstream

Even with treatment, about 10 to 15 out of 100 people with meningococcal 

disease will die from it. Meningococcal vaccines are the best way to protect 

preteens and teens from getting meningococcal disease.

When should my child 

be vaccinated?

MenACWY

Dose 1: Ages 11-12

Dose 2: Age 16

All preteens and teens should get 2 doses of the meningococcal conjugate 

(MenACWY) vaccine. They should get the first dose at ages 11-12 and a booster dose 

at 16 years old. If your teen hasn’t gotten this meningococcal shot, talk to their doctor 

or nurse about getting it as soon as possible.

Teens and young adults (16 through 23 years old) may also get a serogroup B 

meningococcal (MenB) vaccine (2 doses). The preferred age to get MenB vaccine is 

16 through 18 years old. Talk with your teen’s doctor or nurse about meningococcal 

vaccination to help protect your child’s health.

Are meningococcal 

vaccines safe for my 

child?

Researchers have studied the meningococcal vaccines very carefully and they are shown to be

very safe. Like any vaccine, meningococcal vaccines may cause mild side effects, like redness and soreness 

where the shot was given (usually in the arm). Note that your child can get both meningococcal vaccines 

during the same visit, but in different arms.

Some preteens and teens might faint after getting a meningococcal vaccine or any shot. To help avoid 

fainting and injuries related to fainting, preteens and teens should sit or lie down when they get a shot

and then for about 15 minutes after getting the shot. Serious side effects from meningococcal

vaccines are rare.

How can I get help 

paying for these 

vaccines?

Most health insurance plans cover routine vaccinations. The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program also 

provides vaccines for children 18 years and younger who are uninsured, underinsured, Medicaid-eligible, 

American Indian, or Alaska Native. Learn more at www.cdc.gov/Features/VFCprogram.

Talk to your child’s doctor or nurse

about meningococcal vaccines, or visit

www.cdc.gov/meningococcal/vaccine-info.html 

Last updated JULY 2019
No. 11-141.

#### Peanut Farmers, Petitioners v. William J. Murphy, Administrator, Risk Management Agency.

565 U.S. 883, 132 S. Ct. 254,

181 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5245.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 246.
No. 10-11298.

#### Maria Caterina Rosenfeld, Petitioner v. James Hackett, et al.

565 U.S. 877, 132 S. Ct. 240,

181 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7097.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
What is victimization?

Victimization is harm caused on 

purpose. It is not an “accident” and can 

happen anywhere. While anyone can 

be victimized, people with disabilities 

are at greater risk for victimization than 

people without disabilities. This fact 

sheet provides a general overview of 

victimization and the risks to people 

with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 

other disabilities. 

What does victimization 

include?

•	 Physical violence with

or without a weapon

•	 Sexual violence of any

kind including rape

•	 Emotional abuse,

including verbal attacks

or being humiliated

•	 Neglect of personal needs

for daily life, including medical 

care or equipment

How often does

victimization occur?

•	 In the United States, people 

with disabilities are 4 to 10 times 

more likely to be victimized than 

people without them. 

•	 Children with disabilities are 

more than twice as likely to be 

victimized as children without 

them. 

What is known

about victimization?

•	 The two most common places for 

victimization are hospitals and at

home.

•	 Victims usually know the person

who harms them. They can be 

health care workers, intimate 

partners, or family members. 

More men than women cause 

harm to people with disabilities.

Why are people with a TBI

at risk for victimization?

A TBI may cause problems that can 

increase risk. Known problems include:

•	 Difficulty understanding risky 

situations or avoiding risky 

persons

Victimization of Persons with

Traumatic Brain Injury or Other Disabilities:

A Fact Sheet for Friends and Families
•	 Difficulty controlling one’s temper 

which causes others to get angry 

•  Behavioral problems, such

drinking too much

What can be done to help

a friend or family member

who is being victimized? 

•	 Don’t be afraid to voice your concern 

for their safety

•	 Acknowledge that they are in a very 

difficult and scary situation

•	 Be supportive

•	 Don’t be judgmental

•	 Encourage them to talk to people 

who can provide help and guidance

•	 Help them plan safety steps so that

they will know what to do and how to 

reduce their risk of harm when they

are being victimized

•	 Remember that you cannot “rescue” them

Getting Help:

•	 Dial 911 if you need immediate 

assistance.

•	 Call the National Domestic Violence 

Hotline at:

1-800-799-SAFE or

TTY 1-800-787-3224

This hotline is available 24 hours a 

day, seven days a week. Confidential 

services include crisis intervention, 

safety planning, and referrals to local 

service providers. Assistance is available 

in English and Spanish, and in other 

languages. 

More Information:

CDC’s National Center for Injury 

Prevention and Control 

This site provides an overview and 

fact sheet regarding intimate partner 

violence. 

www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/ipvoverview.htm

This site includes a list of 

organizations working to

prevent victimization.

www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/ipvlinks.htm

The National Domestic

Violence Hotline

This site provides a wide range of

information and links to many 

prevention and support groups.

www.ndvh.org/educate/online.html

Safer • Healthier • PeopleTM
### SNAP Monica Shimamura to: Kline, Kelley (GE Indust, ConsInd) 09/12/2008 12:40 PM Cc: Margaret Sheppard, Dave Godwin Bcc: Cindy Newberg Follow Up: Normal Priority. 

### Hi Kelley, Below is our initial feed back and our follow up questions on your SNAP submission. Please provide more discussion on training particularly service personnel. 1. The risk assessment needs more information and better documentation of the assumptions 2. used. EPA would like a fault tree analysis similar to the one from A. D. Little. 3.

4. There are no engineering diagrams, showing where equipment would be different from a refrigerator using a non-flammable refrigerant. Could you please provide engineering diagrams. 5. Please provide a discussion of refrigerant/oil solubility. Overall, the information was good and useful, especially the UL Standards. GE's first attempt at the risk assessment was good however the are some deficiencies such as the lack of guidelines and training materials and the lack of a fault tree analysis or adequate documentation for the risk assessment. Once you and your team had a chance to review the questions, we can set up a conference call. Otherwise, please feel free to call me anytime if you have any immediate questions or concerns.

Cheers, Monica

Monica Shimamura U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Stratospheric Protection Division 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (6205J) Washington DC 20460 (tel) 202.343.9337 (fax) 202.343.2362 Address for hand delivery: 1310 L St. NW, 10th Floor (1027N) Washington DC 20005 .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> ,.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>  ̧.· ́ ̄`·..· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧><((((o>
#### T.L.B., In re; Com., In re 39

05/18/2016

98 MAL (2016)

39

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 127 A.3d 813
(logo)RialtoCAPTIAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofJune 1, 2017 by and among CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P. as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wilmington Trust as Trustee andWells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, PayingAgent, and Custodian relating to the CFCRE 2017-C8 Mortgage Trust, CommercialMortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 **(CFCRE 2017-C8)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.     Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of June 8, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and if therehas been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect,each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein. 

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                                Date: March1, 2018

     Adam Singer,Managing Director
1 of 2 

ADC 236 

Attachment 

ATTACHMENT TO ADC 236 

Revise the Property Accountability Accuracy Goal for Controlled Inventory 

Items Not Subject to Annual Complete Physical Inventory (Supply) 

1. ORIGINATOR: 

a. Service/Agency: Defense Logistics Agency 

b. Originator: DLA-J-3731, DSN 427-1606, Commercial 703-767-1606

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply - Physical Inventory Control Program

3. REQUESTED CHANGE: 

 a. Title: Revise the Property Accountability Accuracy Goal for Controlled 

Inventory Items Not Subject to Annual Complete Physical Inventory (Supply). 

b. Description of Change: This ADC revises the property accountability records 

accuracy level currently published in DOD 4000.25-M, and DOD 4000.25-2-M, from 85 

percent to 95 percent, for controlled inventory items that are not subject to an annual 

complete physical inventory. 

c. Procedures: Revise DOD 4000.25-M, DLMS, Volume 2, Chapter 6, paragraph 

C6.2.10.2.3; and corresponding DOD 4000.25-2-M, Military Standard Transaction 

Reporting and Accountability Procedures (MILSTRAP), Chapter 7, paragraph 7.2.10.2.3, 

to change the level used in statistical sampling for accuracy of property accountability 

records, from 85% to 95% as follows (change identified by red/bold/italicized/highlighted

text): 

“All controlled inventory items not subject to annual complete physical inventory must 

be subjected to annual random statistical sampling. Acceptable statistical sampling 

techniques are widely prescribed and may be used so long as every item included in the 

population has an equal probability of being selected in the sample. The statistical 

sampling technique must provide reasonable assurance (as a minimum) that the property 

accountability records are accurate with a 95 percent level of confidence, accuracy level 

of 85 95 percent, and a maximum margin of error of 2 percent. If the sample inventory 

results do not satisfy the above criteria, complete physical inventory of the population 

from which the sample was selected, will be performed.”

d. Alternatives: No known alternatives. 

4. REASON FOR CHANGE: DLA proposed that the current DLMS/MILSTRAP

level of 85% accuracy level for property accountability records for controlled inventory 

items subject to random statistical sampling, be raised to 95% to improve standards. This 

recommendation was discussed at the November 2, 2006 and April 18, 2007, Joint 

Physical Inventory Working Group (JPIWG) meeting, and agreed to by all Service 

participants at the meetings. 
2 of 2 

ADC 236 

Attachment 

5. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES: 

a. Advantages: Increases the confidence in the accuracy of inventory accountable 

records. 

b. Disadvantages: None.

6. IMPACT: 

a. Data Content: None known.

b. Publication(s): Revises MILSTRAP, DLMS and Service/Agency publications 

as applicable.
Exhibit 10.70





                                                  December 5, 1997

Mr. Gary J. Kernaghan
Farah Incorporated
P.O. Box 13800
El Paso, Texas 79925

         Re:    Extension of Employment Agreement

Dear Gary,

         Reference  is made to that  certain  Amended  and  Restated  Employment
Agreement by and between Farah  Incorporated  (the "Company") and yourself dated
August 25,  1994,  as amended on March 2, 1996 (the  "Agreement").  The  Company
wishes to extend the term of the Agreement. Therefore, the Company proposes that
Section 1(b) of the  Agreement be amended to delete the date "March 1, 1998" and
to insert  the date  "March 1,  1999."  All other  terms and  provisions  of the
Agreement will remain unchanged.

         If the  foregoing  terms are  acceptable to you,  please  indicate your
acceptance by signing below.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          Farah Incorporated

                                          /s/ Richard C. Allender
                                          Richard C. Allender
                                          Chairman of the Board,
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



Agreed and accepted as of the 5th day of December, 1997:


/s/ Gary J. Kernaghan
Gary J. Kernaghan
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Chief Executive Officer of FAT Brands Inc. certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of FAT Brands Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
May 14, 2020



| | /s/
    Andrew A. Wiederhorn
| | ----------------------------
| | Andrew
    A. Wiederhorn    
| | Chief
    Executive Officer
No. 11-5268.

#### Bruce Listman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 289,

181 L. Ed. 2d 174,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5657.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 425.