VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 23-AP-259

109 State Street

Montpelier VT 05609-0801

802-828-4774

www.vermontjudiciary.org

Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a crossappellant. Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal.

ENTRY ORDER

MAY TERM, 2024

Christina M. Fisher* v. Department of Labor }

}

APPEALED FROM:

} Employment Security Board

} CASE NO. 11-22-076-01

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Claimant appeals an Employment Security Board order, which affirmed a decision by an

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissing claimant’s appeal to the ALJ as untimely filed. We 

affirm.

Claimant applied for unemployment compensation in 2021. On November 10, 2021, a 

claims adjudicator issued a notice denying her claim because she was not able and available for

work as required by statute. Claimant did not recall receiving the notice. On October 7, 2022, 

the Department of Labor sent a reissued determination to claimant’s address of record. The

determination warned that it would become final unless claimant appealed in thirty days. 

Claimant submitted a notice of appeal to an ALJ by email on November 13, 2022. Because

claimant’s appeal was filed beyond the thirty-day appeal period, the ALJ dismissed the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. 

Claimant appealed to the Board. The Board adopted the ALJ’s findings. The Board

sustained the ALJ decision, concluding that claimant’s appeal was filed beyond the thirty-day 

statutory appeal period and therefore was properly dismissed. Claimant appeals.

On appeal to this Court, claimant does not contest the underlying facts regarding the date 

of the reissued determination or the date of her appeal. She argues that her late filing was due to 

many factors outside her control, including the pandemic and her medical condition. She also 

argues that there was a delay in mail delivery, and she did not receive the October 7, 2022,

determination until between November 2-5, 2022. For these reasons, claimant contends the 

appeal period should be extended past the thirty-day deadline. 

Pursuant to statute, a claimant may appeal a determination regarding unemployment

compensation by filing an appeal “within 30 days after notice,” and appeal periods commence 

“from the date of the determination or decision rendered.” 21 V.S.A. §§ 1348(a), 1357. When a 

person submits a sworn statement that the notice was not received and the Commissioner is 

satisfied that the person did not receive notice, a new notice is sent, and the appeal period runs 
2

from “the date on which the new notice is sent.” Id. § 1357. This Court has held that the time

for filing an appeal to an ALJ is established by statute and jurisdictional and cannot be extended, 

except as provided by statute. Allen v. Vt. Emp. Sec. Bd., 133 Vt. 166, 168 (1975); see Trask v. 

Dep’t of Emp. & Training, 170 Vt. 589, 591 (2000) (mem.) (concluding that appeal was 

untimely where it was mailed one day after appeal period expired). Here, the reissued 

determination was sent October 7, 2022. Claimant submitted her appeal more than thirty days 

later. Claimant’s proffered grounds for extending that period—the pandemic, claimant’s health, 

the mailing delay—are not bases under the statute to extend the appeal period. Therefore, 

claimant’s appeal was properly dismissed as untimely filed, and we do not reach claimant’s 

arguments regarding the merits of the underlying decision by the claims adjudicator. 

Affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice

Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice

William D. Cohen, Associate Justice