alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 070798D]


Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of Scientific Research Permit 1144.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on June 23, 1998, NMFS issued 
Scientific Research Permit 1144 to Bruce D. Peery, Michael J. Bresette, 
and Jonathan C. Gorham, to take listed sea turtles for the purpose of 
scientific research subject to certain conditions set forth therein.

ADDRESSES: The application, permit, and related documents are available 
for review by appointment in the following offices:
    Office of Protected Resources, F/PR3, NMFS, 1315 East-West Hwy., 
Room 13307, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and Director, 
Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721 Executive Center Drive, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813-893-3141).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice was published on April 27, 1998 (63 
FR 20638) that an application had been filed by Bruce D. Peery, Michael 
J. Bresette, and Jonathan C. Gorham (1144), to take listed sea turtles 
as authorized by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 
1531-1543) and NMFS regulations governing listed fish and wildlife 
permits (50 CFR parts 217-222).
    The applicants requested a one-year scientific research permit to 
take listed sea turtles. Up to 75 green (Chelonia mydas) and 25 
loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtles will be taken in large mesh tangle 
nets for the purposes of stock assessment to characterize the sea 
turtles that utilize the southern Indian River Lagoon System, Florida. 
Captured turtles will be weighed, photographed, measured, tagged, and 
released. NMFS issued permit 1144 on June 23, 1998.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the listed species that are the 
subject of this permit, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-18733 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
No. 10-11014.

#### Sean Kyler, Petitioner v. Dale Artus, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 932, 132 S. Ct. 377,

181 L. Ed. 2d 238,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6386.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 597.
No. 10-11189.

#### Dwight E. Moss, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 226,

181 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7016,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# 1 C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 02 5 . BOLTON v . THE STATE.

Th e ap p eal o f t h e ab o v e-referen ced cas e was d o ck e t e d o n J an u ary 2 3

, 2 0 1 6,

an d t h e ap p el l an t was n o t i fi ed t h at hi s e n u m e r a t i o n s of erro r an d b ri ef were d u e

wi t h i n 20 d ay s o f d o ck et i n g ( i.e., b y Feb ru ary 1 3, 2 01 6 ). A s o f F e b r u ary 1 5

, 2 0 1 6,

ap p el l an t h ad fai l ed t o fi le h i s en u m erat io n s o f erro r an d bri ef an d h ad n o t m o v ed fo r

an ex t en s i o n of t im e i n wh i ch t o fi l e. Acco rd i n g l y

, t h i s Co u rt d irect ed ap pel l an t t o fi l e

h i s en u m erat i o n s o f er r o r a n d b ri ef w it h i n 1 0 d ay s an d n o t i fi ed ap p el l an t t h at t h e

fai l u re t o d o s o wo u l d res u l t i n th e d i s m i s s al o f th e ap p eal

. S ee La mb r o s v. Lo n g i o t t i

,

1 8 9 Ga. Ap p

. 8 3 7 (3 7 8 SE2 d 4 1 6 ) (1 98 9 )

. T h e 1 0 d ay s h av e no w p as s ed

, an d

ap p el l an t h as f

a i l e d t o f i l e a b ri ef as o rd ered b y t hi s Co u rt

. Th us

, t h i s ap p eal i s

DI SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 08, 2017

03/08/2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY

PETITION OF: D.K. AND A.A. :

:

:

:

: No. 92 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of December , 2018, in consideration of the Petition for

Relief through the Exercise of this Court’s King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary

Jurisdiction, this Court assumes jurisdiction over this matter. The temporary redaction of

Petitioners’ names and other identifying infor mation from Report 1 of the Fortieth

Statewide Investigating Grand Jury is made permanent. See In re Fortieth Statewide

Investigating Grand Jury , 190 A.3d 560 (Pa. 2018); In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating

Grand Jury

, 2018 WL _________ (Pa. Dec. 3, 20 18).

The Motion for Leave to File under Seal is GRANTED. The Motion to Unseal and

the Application to Lift Stay are DENIED.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

The instant order is unsealed.
No. 10-11272.

#### Paul C., Sr., Petitioner v. Nebraska.

565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 237,

181 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6503.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Wednesday, July 29, 1998.

PLACE: NRC Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

STATUS: Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of July 27

Wednesday, July 29
2:00 p.m.
    Briefing on Operating Reactors and Fuel Facilities (Public meeting)
4:00 p.m.
    Affirmation Session (Public meeting)
    *(Please note: This item will be affirmed immediately following the 
conclusion of the preceding meeting.)
    a: Private Fuel Storage, L.L.C.; Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
Memorandum and Order, LBP-98-7 (April 22, 1998)
    (Tentative)

    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition, distribution of 
this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are 
interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule 
electronically, please send an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8dfc5c0e8c6dacb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="57203a3f1739253479303821">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc9c6daedc3dfce83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73171804331d01105d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Acting Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20102 Filed 7-23-98; 11:30 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-6287.

#### Anthony Bernard Sanders, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 439,

181 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7168.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-6396.

#### Edward Goodman, Petitioner v. John Kerestes, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 524,

181 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7840.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38817-38818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada 
Test Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada Test Site.

DATES: Wednesday, August 5, 1998: 5:30 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Support Facility, Great 
Basin Room, 232 Energy Way, North Las Vegas, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Rohrer, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 98518, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89193-8513, phone: 702-295-0197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

5:30 p.m.  Call to Order
5:40 p.m.  Presentations
7:00 p.m.  Public Comment/Questions
7:30 p.m.  Break
7:45 p.m.  Review Action Items
8:00 p.m.  Approve Meeting Minutes

[[Page 38818]]

8:10 p.m.  Committee Reports
8:45 p.m.  Public Comment
9:00 p.m.  Adjourn

    Copies of the final agenda will be available at the meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Kevin Rohrer, at the telephone number 
listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and 
reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the 
agenda. The Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Kevin Rohrer at 
the address listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on July 15, 1998.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19240 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 11-6073.

#### Mohammad Bhatti, Petitioner v. Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.

565 U.S. 967, 132 S. Ct. 463,

181 L. Ed. 2d 302,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7590.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.

Same case below, 334 S.W.3d 444.
**
**Exhibit 34.2**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019, except forservicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to theservicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of lessthan all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to ourtests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and forthe year ended March 31, 2019, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 22, 2019 
**
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley F. Whiting, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 USC section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
for the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of  operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Wesley F. Whiting
                                                --------------------------
                                      Wesley F. Whiting, Chief Executive Officer

Dated 01/09/03
**Attachment**

**Action Item Tracker – SDR PRC 22-01 Meeting (March 24, 2022)**

**Current as of April 12, 2022**

SDR PRC 22-01 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/SDRPRC/

Page **4** of **5**
No. 10-6655.

#### Marcellus Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1064,

178 L. Ed. 2d 878,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1063.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 610, 178 L. Ed. 2d 444, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8871.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging
[Program Announcement No. AoA-98-8]


Fiscal Year 1998 Program Announcement; Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Announcement of availability of funds and request for 
applications to carry out the functions of a National Resource and 
Educational Center on Women and Retirement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration of Aging (AoA) announces that under this 
program announcement it will hold a competition for a grant award for a 
National Resource and Educational Center on Women and Retirement. The 
deadline date for the submission of applications is September 9, 1998. 
Public and/or nonprofit agencies, organizations, and institutions are 
eligible to apply under this program announcement. To be considered for 
funding, however, applicants must demonstrate a knowledge base, and a 
proven track record of experience, in issues and programs of relevance 
to women, economic security, and retirement.
    Application kits are available by writing to the Department of 
Health and Humans Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program 
Development, 330 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4274, Washington, DC 
20201, telephone (202) 619-1269 or (202) 619-1058.

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
Jeanette C. Takamura,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 98-19287 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-40-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Registration

    By Notice dated April 3, 1998, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 14, 1998, (63 FR 18227), Lilly del Caribe, Inc., 
Chemical Plant, Kilometer 146.7, State Road 2, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 
00680, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of dextropropoxyphene (9273), a 
basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture bulk product for distribution to its 
customers.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Lilly del 
Caribe, Inc. to manufacture dextropropoxyphene is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 
28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the 
above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class 
of controlled substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: July 13, 1998.
John H. King.
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-20178 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
113

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Ohio

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $132.0 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 20,200

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 259,100

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $5,647 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $841.8 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $295.2 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $1,137.0 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 12%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$34.3 $42.9 $2.97 $3.72

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$10.0 $14.4 $0.87 $1.25

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $35.7 $57.5 $3.09 $4.98

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$8.0 $11.5 $0.69 $1.00

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$4.0 $5.7 $0.35 $0.50

TOTAL $92.0 $132.0 $7.97 $11.45

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014