alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3908 STANDARD 93.42 1.52 -8.40

Tolerance

1 3908A YELLOW LIMIT 94.36 1.49 -7.16 0.94 -0.03 1.24 1.19

2 3908B GREEN LIMIT 95.26 0.81 -8.78 1.84 -0.71 -0.38 1.27

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number WHITE 521 Piece/Roll Number 3908

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 3, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, POLYESTER/COTTON, 65/35 TWILL 

FOR GFSU, SMOCK, UNISEX GL/PD 13-11

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
Vaccine Administration: 

Needle Gauge and Length

The following table outlines recommended needle gauges and lengths. In addition, clinical judgment should be used 

when selecting needles to administer injectable vaccines.

Route Age Needle gauge and length Injection site

Subcutaneous 

injection All ages 

23–25-gauge 

5/8 inch (16 mm)

Thigh for infants younger than 

12 months of age1; upper 

outer triceps area for persons 

12 months of age and older 

Intramuscular 

injection

Neonate, 28 days and younger 22–25-gauge

5/8 inch (16 mm2)

Vastus lateralis muscle of 

anterolateral thigh

Infants, 1–12 months 22–25-gauge

1 inch (25 mm)

Vastus lateralis muscle of 

anterolateral thigh

Toddlers, 1–2 years 

22–25-gauge

1–1.25 inches (25–32 mm)

Vastus lateralis muscle of 

anterolateral thigh3

22–25-gauge

5/82–1 inch (16–25 mm) Deltoid muscle of arm

Children, 3–10 years 

22–25-gauge

5/82–1 inch (16–25 mm) Deltoid muscle of arm3

22–25-gauge

1–1.25 inches (25–32 mm)

Vastus lateralis muscle of 

anterolateral thigh

Children, 11–18 years 22–25-gauge 

5/82–1 inch (16–25 mm) Deltoid muscle of arm3,5

Adults, 19 years and older

 130 lbs (60 kg) or less

 130–152 lbs (60–70 kg)

 Men, 152–260 lbs (70–118 kg)

 Women, 152–200 lbs (70–90 kg)

 Men, 260 lbs (118 kg) or more

 Women, 200 lbs (90 kg) or more

22–25-gauge

1 inch (25 mm4)

1 inch (25 mm)

1–1.5 inches (25–38 mm)

1–1.5 inches (25–38 mm)

1.5 inches (38 mm)

1.5 inches (38 mm)

Deltoid muscle of arm3,5 

1 May be administered into the upper outer triceps area if necessary

2 If the skin is stretched tightly and subcutaneous tissues are not bunched

3 Preferred site

4 Some experts recommend a 5/8-inch needle for men and women weighing less than 60 kg, if used, skin must be stretched tightly and subcutaneous tissues must not be bunched.

5 The vastus lateralis muscle in the anterolateral thigh can also be used. Most adolescents and adults will require a 1- to 1.5-inch (25–38 mm) needle to ensure intramuscular administration.

Vaccines must reach the desired tissue to provide an optimal immune response and 

reduce the likelihood of injection-site reactions. Needle selection should be based on the:

 Route  Age  Gender and weight 

for adults 

(19 years and older)

 Injection site

Reference: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices General Best Practice Guidelines for Immunization.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/administration.html

08/04/20

U.S. D

Heal

Cente

Cont
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38828-38829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19263]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1223-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida, (FEMA-1223-DR), dated June 18, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.


[[Page 38829]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Florida, is hereby amended to include Individual Assistance in the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of June 18, 1998.

    Brevard, Flagler, St. Johns, Seminole, and Volusia Counties 
(already designated for Category B under the Public Assistance 
porgram).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-19263 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
No. 10-11009.

#### Timothy D. Murphy, Petitioner v. Carla Grenier, et al.

565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 202,

181 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6524.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 972.
No. 10-10814.

#### Jonathan Lee Gentry, Petitioner v. Stephen D. Sinclair, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

565 U.S. 963, 132 S. Ct. 453,

181 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7528.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

Same case below, 170 Wash. 2d 711, 245 P.3d 766.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Acceptance of Group Application Under Public Law 95-202 and 
Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 1000.20 ``The Operational 
Analysis Group of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, 
Office of Emergency Management, Which Served Overseas With the U.S. 
Army Air Corps From December 7, 1941 Through August 15, 1945''

    Under the provisions of section 401, Public Law 95-202 and DoD 
Directive 1000.20, the Department of Defense Civilian/Military Service 
Review Board has accepted an application on behalf of the group known 
as: ``The Operational Analysis Group of the Office of Scientific 
Research and Development, Office of Emergency Management, which served 
overseas with the U.S. Army Air Corps from December 7, 1941 through 
August 15, 1945.'' Persons with information or documentation pertinent 
to the determination of whether the service of this group should be 
considered active military service to the Armed Forces of the United 
States are encouraged to submit such information or documentation 
within 60 days to the DoD Civilian/Military Service Review Board, 1535 
Command Drive, EE-Wing, 3rd Floor, Andrews Air Force Base, MD 20762-
7002. Copies of documents or other materials submitted cannot be 
returned.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-2029 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
No. 11-6107.

#### Judith Tompson, Petitioner v. Massachusetts Department of Mental Health.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 512,

181 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7781,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 76 Mass. App. 586, 924 N.E.2d 747.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3019 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3019

   To require that Federal agencies only procure cut flowers and cut 
     greens produced in the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

 Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Herrera Beutler, 
Mr. Panetta, Mr. Carbajal, and Mr. Yoho) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that Federal agencies only procure cut flowers and cut 
     greens produced in the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Grown Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT.

    (a) In General.--Funds appropriated or otherwise available to a 
Federal agency may only be used for the procurement of a cut flower or 
cut green if the cut flower or cut green is produced in the United 
States.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Cut flower.--The term ``cut flower'' means a flower 
        removed from a living plant for decorative use.
            (2) Cut green.--The term ``cut green'' means a green, 
        foliage, or branch removed from a living plant for decorative 
        use.
            (3) Federal agency.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``Federal agency'' means 
                each instrumentality of the Federal Government.
                    (B) Exception.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), 
                the term ``Federal agency'' does not include an 
                instrumentality of the Federal Government if the 
                instrumentality is located outside of the several 
                States or the District of Columbia.
            (4) Produced in the united states.--The term ``produced in 
        the United States'' means grown in--
                    (A) any of the several States;
                    (B) the District of Columbia;
                    (C) a territory or possession of the United States; 
                or
                    (D) an area subject to the jurisdiction of a 
                federally recognized Indian Tribe.
    (c) Applicability.--This section shall apply to a procurement made 
or contracted for on or after the date that is one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(1) Adjusting Price $17.10 CWT

(2) Base Price $19.51 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($2.41)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.2072)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.1036)

Price change per quart ($0.0518)

Price change per pint ($0.0259)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0194)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0162)

Price change per half pint ($0.0130)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.21)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.10)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.05)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.03)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.02)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Feb. 1, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18867]



[[Page 38175]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 30, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Thomas Sexton, St. Paul, Minnesota; to acquire voting shares of 
Yellow Medicine Bancshares, Inc., Granite Falls, Minnesota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Yellow Medicine County Bank, 
Granite Falls, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 10, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18867 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


North Country National Scenic Trail, Wisconsin; Notice of 
Availability

SUMMARY: A public planning process has been conducted for Northwest 
Wisconsin and the Adjoining Minnesota Region to select a specific route 
or trailway for the North Country National Scenic Trail in this region. 
The planning process identified and mapped a specific ``corridor of 
opportunity'' within which public and private partners working to 
establish and manage the trail will work to secure lands on which the 
actual footpath can be constructed. This will require the cooperation 
of willing landowners. Lands may be secured by outright purchase, 
easement, lease, or voluntary use agreements. The identified corridor 
is several landowners wide to allow flexibility in working with willing 
landowners to find a mutually agreeable alignment for the trail. A copy 
of the trailway plan entitled ``Final Trailway Plans for Northwest 
Wisconsin and the Adjoining Minnesota Region'' can be obtained by 
writing to the Superintendent at the address listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Tom Gilbert, Ice Age, North Country, and Lewis and Clark 
National Trails, 700 Rayovac Drive, Suite 100, Madison, Wisconsin 
53711; 608-264-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In March 1980, Federal legislation 
authorized the establishment of the North Country National Scenic Trail 
(NST) as a component of the National Trails System (16 U.S.C. 1241 et 
seq.). The trail will extend approximately 4,200 miles across seven 
northern States: New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, 
Minnesota, and North Dakota. Approximately 1,484 miles are completed 
and open to public use. A comprehensive management plan, published in 
September 1982, identified a general route for the trail.

    Dated: July 9, 1998.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-19474 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
No. 11-6549.

#### Chung Kao, Petitioner v. Mike Knowles, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1066, 132 S. Ct. 772,

181 L. Ed. 2d 496,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8651.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


For Immunization Managers


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Vaccine Confidence Among Adults						Print
																Related Pages
					COVIDVaxViewDownload Data Table | Back to COVIDVaxView main page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  September 23, 2021						Source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeCOVIDVaxView Home
COVIDVaxView Interactive!plus icon
Weekly Dashboardplus icon
Child
Adult
Pregnant Persons
Monthly Dashboardplus icon
Adults
Children
Data Sources
Publications
COVID-19 Vaccination Mapping Tool


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
| EXHIBIT 21                             |         |         |   |                                                   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiaries of Sun River Energy, Inc. |         |         |   |                                                   |
|                                   |         |         |   |                                                   |
|                                   |    | State of     |   |                                                   |
| Name                                   |         | Organization |   | Doing Business As                            |
|                                   |         |         |   |                                                   |
| Sun River Operating, Inc.              |    | Texas        |   | Sun River Operating, Inc. and PC Operating Texas, Inc. |
|                                   |         |         |   |                                                   |
| Sun River Energy I, LLC                |    | Texas        |   | Sun River Energy I, LLC and Sun River                  |
|                                   |         |         |   |                                                   |
| New River Exploration, Inc.            |         | Colorado     |   | New River Exploration, Inc. and Sun River Energy, Inc. |
No. 11-273.

#### David Torgerson, et al., Petitioners v. City of Rochester, Minnesota.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 513,

181 L. Ed. 2d 349,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7902.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 1031.
(1) Adjusting Price $20.58 CWT

(2) Base Price $21.86 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (1.28)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.11)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.06)

Price change per quart ($0.03) 

Price change per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price change per half pint ($0.01)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.11)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.06)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.03)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Jan. 7th, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,176
<INVENTORY>                                     39,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,717
<PP&E>                                         225,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,738
<BONDS>                                        317,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,724
<SALES>                                        122,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,366
<CGS>                                           90,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,914
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 77-303441 STANDARD 37.82 0.39 -6.17

Tolerance

1 77-303441A THIN BLUEGREEN LIMIT 38.58 0.17 -6.64 0.76 -0.22 -0.47 0.70

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT October 19, 2019

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, ELASTIQUE, WOOL MIL-DTL-3738

Shade Number CADET GREY 172 Piece/Roll Number 77-303441
No. 11-5804.

#### Richard Lonnie Booker, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 964, 132 S. Ct. 455,

181 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7514.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 51 Cal. 4th 141, 245 P.3d 366.