alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting, CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, CFO

Dated: October 28,2005
No. 11-5679.

#### Robert Simmons, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 918, 132 S. Ct. 340,

181 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7053.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 207.
No. 11-5053.

#### Steve A. Reed, Petitioner v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 263,

181 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5213.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: May 8, 2006



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
December 11, 2013

Mr. Carl Daly (8P

- AR) Director , Air Programs U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202

- 1129

Dear Mr. Daly:

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division, is providing clarification pertai ning to the May 25 , 201 1 SIP submittal of Colorado Regulation 3 and the Common Provisions that address the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule. In particular, EPA wants clarification on the so

- called rescission clause set forth in Section I.B.44.f

. of Part A, Regulation 3. With respect to this section, we intend to implement this clause , in part, as follows:

1) Colorado will wait for EPA’s timely interpretation of a Court action; and, 2) Colorado will provide public notice of any re s cission.

If you have any questions p lease contact Dena Wojtach at 303

- 692

- 3147.

Sincerely,

William C. Allison V

Director, Air Pollution Control Division

Cc: Monica Morales Mark Komp
No. 10-1042.

#### Tammy Foret Freeman, et vir, Petitioners v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

565 U.S. 941, 132 S. Ct. 397,

181 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7384.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

*255Same case below, 626 F.3d 799.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting,  President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, President

Dated: December 23, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-12]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Knoxville, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Knoxville, IA.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 28891 is effective on 
0901 UTC, August 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct rule with a 
request for comments in the Federal Register on May 27, 1998 (63 FR 
28891). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effect on August 13, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on June 16, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-19669 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3147

_____________________________

KYLE RAY HIMES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

October 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kyle Ray Himes, appeals from an order 

summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed 

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his 

motion, Appellant asserted several grounds for relief based on 

newly discovered evidence. The lower court denied all such claims 

as successive in its order rendered on July 17, 2017. However, 

because the lower court did not include attachments of record 

evidence which conclusively refuted Appellant’s claims, we 

reverse. 

“To uphold the trial court's summary denial of claims raised 

in a 3.850 motion, the claims must be either facially invalid or 

conclusively refuted by the record.” Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253, 
2

257 (Fla. 1999). “On appeal from the denial of relief, unless the 

record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no 

relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an 

evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief.” Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2)(D). 

Here, Appellant’s claims appear to be facially valid, and they 

are not conclusively refuted by the record. In fact, the State 

concedes error. We therefore reverse the lower court’s summary 

denial of Appellant’s claims of newly discovered evidence and 

remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED. 

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 11-6118.

#### Tron Manuel Littlejohn, Petitioner v. Cecilia R. Reynolds, Warden.

565 U.S. 985, 132 S. Ct. 513,

181 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7736.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 215.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynadapt System, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Wesley Whiting,
President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, President
Date: October 2, 2006
**DAAN-13-04**

**Master Solicitation with Additional Clauses**

(January 2017)

In addition to the clauses/notes contained herein, the Purchase Order clauses/notes are applicable as indicated in the DLA Master Solicitation for EProcurement Automated Simplified Acquisitions (Part 13), per the Revision and Date stated within the corresponding solicitation.  The DLA Master Solicitation may be found on the Web at http://www.dla.mil/HQ/Acquisition/Offers/eProcurement.aspx.  

(End of Notice)
No. 11-5469.

#### Ahmed Aboutaleb, Petitioner v. Reham Yassin.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 316,

181 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5873.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-5691.

#### Carlos Bladimir Montoya, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 341,

181 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6990.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 221.
May 9, 2022

Dear Tribal Leader:

On behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances 

and Disease Registry (ATSDR), I invite you to join this upcoming meeting that will convene leaders from 

tribal nations, CDC, and ATSDR:

24th Biannual CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting 

August 3, 2022, 9:00–5:00 pm (CT)

August 4, 2022, 9:00–5:00 pm (CT)

The meeting will be hosted by Cherokee Nation in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, with the option to attend either 

in person or virtually. Seating at the in-person event is limited, so be sure to register early if you plan to 

attend in person. Please use the registration form and indicate whether you’ll attend in person or 

virtually. (Everyone who registers will receive a unique link to access the virtual meeting. This will allow 

people who want to attend in person to participate from a remote location if their schedule doesn’t allow 

them to be on site the whole time.)

The meeting will provide opportunities for tribal leaders to hear about and provide input on the public 

health issues affecting their tribal nations. These topics will include, but are not limited to, tribal priorities 

for CDC and ATSDR and CDC programmatic highlights. We look forward to productive discussions at the 

meeting. The agenda will be available on the CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee webpage in July 

2022.

We hope you will join us. Your input is very important to us as we work to improve tribal access to CDC

and ATSDR programs and services and to strengthen partnerships with tribes and American Indian and 

Alaska Native (AI/AN) community organizations. CDC and ATSDR remain committed to respecting tribal 

sovereignty while working together to leverage capacity, expertise, and resources to achieve the greatest 

impact on the health issues affecting AI/AN communities.

For more information about the meeting, please contact the Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances 

at TribalSupport@cdc.gov or 404-498-0300.

Sincerely,

José T. Montero, MD, MHCDS

Designated Federal Official, CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee 

Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
No. 11-6544.

#### Felipe Alfonso Avila, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 991, 132 S. Ct. 531,

181 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7660.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

 

March 4, 2013

Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, Director 

Division of Air Quality

Delaware Department of Natural Resources

 and Environmental Control

89 Kings Highway

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili:

On January 24, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Delaware Department of 

Natural Resources and Environmental Control. The SIP revision pertains to the requirements of 

sections 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 of the Clean Air Act, which relate to disclosure of conflicts of 

interest. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and 

is being reviewed to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office 

of Air Program Planning at (215) 814-2182. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely, 

/s/

 Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

 

cc: Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary, DNREC

 Mr. Ronald D. Amirikian, DNREC
No. 11-5900.

#### Elena Strujan, Petitioner v. Teachers College of Columbia University, et al.

565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 460,

181 L. Ed. 2d 299,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7540.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3275 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3275

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand River, Ohio, as the ``Lance Corporal Andy 
                      `Ace' Nowacki Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ANDY ``ACE'' NOWACKI POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand River, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Andy `Ace' Nowacki Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Andy `Ace' Nowacki Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# EVALUATION

# EVALUATION  & COLOR CODES
Exhibit 23.7







VIA SEDAR / EDGAR



Ontario Securities Commission, as Principal Regulator

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



| | Re: | Sierra Metals Inc. (the “Company”)
| | --- | ----------------------------------

Annual Information Form
for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, incorporated by reference into the Company’s Prospectus Supplement
dated October 10, 2017 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated June 29, 2017 (the “Prospectus Supplement”) and
the Annual Report incorporated by reference into the Company’s registration statement on Form F-10 (Registration No. 333-218076)
(the “Registration Statement”)

Consent of Qualified Person



Reference is made to the Annual Report
on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 of the Company (the “Form 40-F”), filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Reference is also made to
the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “AIF”), and its incorporation
by reference: (i) into the Prospectus Supplement, and (ii) as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the Form 40-F.



I hereby consent to the: (i) inclusion
of each of the summary section of the report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Yauricocha
Mine, Yauyos Province, Peru” dated effective July 31, 2017 (the “Yauricocha Technical Report”), and
the summary section of the report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves, Bolivar Mine, Mexico”
dated effective February 28, 2017 (the “Bolivar Technical Report”) in the AIF and any amendments thereto, and
the incorporation of such reports in the AIF, (ii) incorporation of the AIF in the Form 40-F and any amendments thereto, and in
the Company's Registration Statement, including the prospectus contained therein, as amended or supplemented, (iii) incorporation
by reference of the AIF and any amendments thereto, into the Prospectus Supplement and (iv) being named, in and the use of the
Yauricocha Technical Report and the Bolivar Technical Report or portions thereof prepared, reviewed and/or approved by me, in the
AIF and Form 40-F.



I also hereby confirm that I have read
the AIF and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived
from the Yauricocha Technical Report or the Bolivar Technical Report or within my knowledge as a result of the services I performed
in connection with the Yauricocha Technical Report or the Bolivar Technical Report.



[Signature page follows]



1







Dated: March 22, 2018



|/s/ John Tinucci      | 
|--------------------- | 
|John Tinucci, PhD, PE | 





2
Exhibit 21LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES   Name JurisdictionBMS Distributing Corp. DelawareCBI Distributing Corp. DelawareClaire’s Accessories Spain, S.L. SpainClaire’s Austria GmbH AustriaClaire’s Belgium B.V.B.A. BelgiumClaire’s Boutiques, Inc. ColoradoClaire’s Canada Corp. DelawareClaire’s France S.A.S FranceClaire’s Germany GmbH GermanyClaire’s Holding GmbH SwitzerlandClaire’s International Europe, Ltd. SwitzerlandClaire’s Netherlands B.V. NetherlandsClaire’s Nippon, Ltd. JapanClaire’s Puerto Rico Corp. DelawareClaire’s Stores Canada Corp. CanadaClaire’s Switzerland GmbH SwitzerlandClaire’s Accessories UK, Ltd. United KingdomCSI Luxembourg S.a.r.l. LuxembourgRSI International Ltd. Hong KongAfterthoughtsMerchandising Corp. DelawareSassyDoo!, Inc. DelawareWhiteClaire’s Accessorros Portugal Unipessol, LDA PortugalBMSFashion Corp. CaymanCSCLimited Partneship Alberta, CanadaClaire’sChina Services China
No. 11-5362.

#### Danny Shelton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 301,

181 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5708.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 514.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MICHAEL J. WALLACE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00012-FDW-CH-1; 3:07-cv-00456-FDW) 

Submitted: October 22, 2009 Decided: November 4, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael J. Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Michael J. Wallace seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. The district court’s orders 

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Wallace has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for production of a 

transcript at government expense, deny a certificate of 

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED