alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-11258.

#### Thomas E. Clark, Petitioner v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 235,

181 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6679.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-5139.

#### Darrell Nelson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273,

181 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5703,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
AFS-14-060-E

March 7, 2014

 Exemption No. 10950

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-1014

Allen Howell

Owner

Wings of Eagles, LLC

276 Doug Warpoole Rd

Smyma, TN 37167

Dear: Mr. Howell

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 20, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Wings of Eagles, LLC (Wings) for an exemption from § 141.27(b)(1) and 

(b)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow 

Wings to apply for a provisional pilot school certificate immediately.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Wings.

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10259 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that requirement to graduate at least 10 different people from the school’s approved 

training course in the proceeding 24 calendar months is a critical metric in determining a pilot 

school’s quality of instruction. This required period of evaluation is used to determine if the 

school’s Training Course Outline, (TCO) have been adequately developed and are being 

properly implemented. The FAA believes this requirement is an important basis for part 141 

pilot school certification, and granting this exemption would allow other similarly situated 

pilot schools to apply for the same exemption, thus reducing the overall level of safety.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10259

also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Wings of Eagles for an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 141.27(b)(1), and (b)(3).

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director,

Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
# "Taking Safety to Victory Lane" at National Night Out

/ Published Aug. 10, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
On Aug. 2, employees, installation residents, and community gathered for Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna’s annual National Night Out.  This year’s theme, “Taking Safety to Victory Lane,” was presented through family-oriented activities with the goal of promoting community involvement in preventing crime and drug use, strengthening police and community relations, and encouraging neighborhood camaraderie.

DLA Installation Support at Susquehanna site director Rob Montefour kicked off the evening, saying, “It’s our goal here on the installation to keep everyone safe and foster a sense of community with all.  We hope you take this opportunity to get to know your local law and emergency services personnel while having a great time.”

The installation opened its firehouse doors to showcase emergency equipment, while children participated in fire prevention activities.  The children had an opportunity to ride tricycles, get their faces painted, ride a zip line, try their hand at a dunk tank, and have fun in bounce houses.  Siblings competed for accuracy by spraying water from a fire hose to a target representing a burning building.  

A picnic meal was provided to everyone in attendance, and several booths were available with information to learn about services the installation provides.

The event was hosted by the installation’s police department, with the fire department and security branch providing support.

The National Night Out program has been traditionally held by the National Association of Town Watch on the first Tuesday of August since 1984.  Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna, home to over 4,000 employees and residents – made up of dozens of military organizations and families of active duty military members – has won the association’s military award seven times since the year 2005.
TENTATIVE AGENDA*as of November 1, 2001*

Page **1 of 2**
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Waste Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), we, David Sutherland-Yoest, Chief Executive Officer, and Ronald L.
Rubin, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:
    /s/ DAVID SUTHERLAND-YOESTDavid Sutherland-YoestChief Executive Officer By:
    /s/ RONALD L. RUBINRonald L. RubinChief Financial Officer Date: May 9, 2005
NUMBER 13-09-00164-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MAXIMO VALDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Maximo Valdez, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

withdraw appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw appeal and

dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
2

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this 11th day of June, 2009.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.'1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.'1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 5, 2004



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3046 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3046

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of a 
military department to retain a reserve chaplain or reserve officer in 
a medical specialty beyond the date that such individual turns 68 years 
                                  old.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2019

   Mr. Mast introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of a 
military department to retain a reserve chaplain or reserve officer in 
a medical specialty beyond the date that such individual turns 68 years 
                                  old.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DEFER MANDATORY SEPARATION AT AGE 68 OF 
              CHAPLAINS AND OFFICERS IN MEDICAL SPECIALTIES IN THE 
              RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 14703(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``An'' and inserting ``(1) Subject to 
        paragraph (2), an''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):
    ``(2) The Secretary concerned may, with the consent of the officer, 
retain in an active status an officer described in subsection (a) 
beyond the date described in paragraph (1) of this subsection if the 
Secretary concerned determines that such retention is necessary to the 
military department concerned. Each such retention shall be made on a 
case-by-case basis and for such period as the Secretary concerned 
determines appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### *Olympic Tug & Barge, Inc., Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Revenue, Respondent,*

No. 92265-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46102-1-II, July 21, 2015, 21,2015,188 188 Wn. App. 949. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|February 9, 2007 |  | /s/ JACK D. MASSIMINO                
|                 |  | Jack D. Massimino                    
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00097-CR

Daniel Mendoza, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 14,205, HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Daniel Mendoza’s counsel has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and

to withdraw from her representation of appellant. Mendoza agreed to the form and substance of

the motion with his signature. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 18, 2012

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3214 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3214

 To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and provide 
 for the discoverability and admissibility of gun trace information in 
                           civil proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2019

Mr. Schiff (for himself, Ms. Mucarsel-Powell, Mr. Crow, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
   Beyer, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
   Khanna, and Mr. Serrano) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and provide 
 for the discoverability and admissibility of gun trace information in 
                           civil proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Justice for Victims 
of Gun Violence Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PROTECTION OF LAWFUL 
              COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT.

    Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
Act (15 U.S.C. 7901-7903) are repealed.

SEC. 3. DISCOVERABILITY AND ADMISSIBILITY OF GUN TRACE INFORMATION IN 
              CIVIL PROCEEDINGS.

    The contents of the Firearms Trace System database maintained by 
the National Trace Center of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 
and Explosives shall not be immune from legal process, shall be subject 
to subpoena or other discovery, shall be admissible as evidence, and 
may be used, relied on, or disclosed in any manner, and testimony or 
other evidence may be permitted based on the data, on the same basis as 
other information, in a civil action in any State (including the 
District of Columbia) or Federal court or in an administrative 
proceeding.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-11090.

#### Larry P. Nardelli, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 866, 132 S. Ct. 213,

181 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6477.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 399 Fed. Appx. 570.
**DAAN-09-02**

**Waiver of First Article Testing**

****(September 2016)

Waiver of the First Article Testing (FAT) requirement cited in this award is conditioned upon 

the awardee's successful approval/conditional approval of FAT under previous contract 

SPXXXX-XX-X-XXXX. Upon notice of first article approval/conditional approval under the contract number listed above, the supplier shall notify the contract administrator cited in the “Issue By” block on this award. Production of the FAT samples required on this contract shall not begin until a decision is made for the FAT samples required on the contract number listed above. Any contractor delays in submission or approval of FAT under the contract listed above does not excuse late delivery under the current contract. In the event that the FAT required under the contract listed above is not approved, this contract may be withdrawn or cancelled at no cost to the Government. 

(End of Notice)
No. 11-5392.

#### Jaime Ortega-Urquidi, aka Jaime Urquidi-Ortega, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 305,

181 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5664.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 305.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         122,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,277,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    871,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,351,279
<PP&E>                                       1,575,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                 804,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,514,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,206,704
<BONDS>                                        538,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,858
<OTHER-SE>                                     744,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,514,447
<SALES>                                      8,467,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,467,411
<CGS>                                        6,287,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,287,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            176,485
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   176,485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P. , hereby certify, based on my knowledge , that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.


Date: August 5, 2011





/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.Martin E. Stein, Jr.Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
No. 11-5643.

#### Robert C. Flowers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 336,

181 L. Ed. 2d 210,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6120.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 302.
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Certifications**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Michael Binney, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

Date: July 29,2019 

 

/s/ Michael Binney

Michael Binney

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. andwill be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dectron Internationale
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ness
Lakdawala, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mauro
Parissi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ' 1350, as adopted pursuant to ' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of the
               operations of the Company.



By:      s: Ness Lakdawala
         -----------------
Name:    Ness Lakdawala
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: December 15, 2005


By:      s: Mauro Parissi
         ----------------
Name:    Mauro Parissi
Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 15, 2005


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ' 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ' 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
*DoD 4000.25-M, Volume 4, August 2004*

*Change 2*

**PAGE**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 7, January 22, 2024*

*Change 7*

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**VOLUME 7: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION**

**Page**

**FOREWORD**	F-1

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**	TOC-1

**CHAPTER 1	INTRODUCTION**

C1.1.	GENERAL	C1-1

C1.2.	POLICY	C1-1

C1.3.	APPLICABILITY	C1-1

C1.4.	SUPPLY PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE........	C1-1

C1.5.	NONCOMPLIANCE	C1-1

C1.6.	PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION	C1-2

***C1.7.	OTHER TRANSACTION (OT) AGREEMENTS	C1-3***

**CHAPTER 2	SHIPMENT NOTIFICATION**

C2.1.	GENERAL	C2-1

C2.2.	PROCEDURES	C2-1

**CHAPTER 3	DESTINATION ACCEPTANCE REPORTING**

C3.1.	GENERAL	C3-1

C3.2.	PROCEDURES	C3-1

**CHAPTER 4	CONTRACT COMPLETION STATUS REPORTING**

C4.1.	GENERAL	C4-1

C4.2.	BASIS FOR CONTRACT CLOSING	C4-2

C4.3.	STANDARD TIMES FOR CONTRACT CLOSING	C4-2

C4.4.	CONTRACT PAYMENT	C4-2

C4.5.	CONTRACT COMPLETION STATEMENT	C4-2

C4.6.	UNCLOSED CONTRACT STATUS	C4-3

C4.7.	CONTRACT CLOSEOUT EXTENSION	C4-4

C4.8.	CANCELLATIONS	C4-4

C4.9.	FAST PAY CONTRACTS	C4-4

C4.10.	PREPARATION OF THE DLMS 567C TRANSACTION	C4-5

C4.11.	AUTOMATED CONTRACT CLOSEOUT	C4-6

C4.12.	CANCELATION OF A UNILATERAL PURCHASE ORDER NOT ACCEPTED BY THE CONTRACTOR	C4-8

**APPENDICES**

AP1	APPENDIX 1.  CONTRACT CLOSEOUT STATUS REPORTCODES		AP1-1

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TOC-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS