alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. 

'j 

SERVED: September 10, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRADLEY L. GOOD 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0043 

AMENDED HEARING NOTICE 

ZU1J S£P l'i (\ O·>b' ' r""'\ I' .) 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on October 2 and 3, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. Department of Labor Courtroom, 

Suite 5150, the Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, 

Long Beach, CA. 90802. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30 

p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Michael Shannon, Respondent's Counsel 

301 R Colorado, Suite 320 

Pasadena, CA 911 01 

Bradley Lawrence Good, Respondent 

385 E. Green St, #2611 

Pasadena, CA 911 01 

TEL: 818-726-2101 

EMAIL: bgood@ourgroup.org 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel (A WP-7 .6) 

Western Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0043 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 23





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Fab Industries, Inc.
New York, New York


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Prospectus
constituting a part of the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 filed August 11,
1997,  the  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-8  filed  June  28,  1993,  the
Registration  Statement on Form S-3 filed January 31, 1992 and the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 filed June 9, 1989 of our report  dated  February 5, 1998
relating  to  the  consolidated   financial   statements  and  schedule  of  Fab
Industries,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 1997.

     We also consent to the  reference to us under the caption  "experts" in the
Prospectus forming a part of such Registration Statements.




                                          /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

                                          BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


New York, New York
February 27, 1998
Table 3.1 - Facility Boiler Summary

Facility 

(1, 2) Description

Boiler 

Unit 

Number

Boiler Type (3) Installation 

Date Primary Fuel (4) Start-Up Fuel (3) Maximum Capacity (MMBtu/hr)

PVT-1 Pulp & Paper 7 Stoker 1955 Coal/20% bark Wood/Coal 122

8 Cyclone 1956 Coal Natural Gas 190.9

9 Package 1969 Natural Gas Natural Gas 140

10 Stoker 1977 Coal/20% bark Wood/Coal 357

11 Package 1995 Natural Gas Natural Gas 249

PVT-2 Pulp & Paper 3 Not Operating

4 Underfeed Stoker 1944 Coal Coal 200

5 Underfeed Stoker 1950 Coal Coal 200

6 Spreader Stoker 1962 Coal Coal 350

7 Cyclone 1968 Coal Coal/Fuel Oil/Natural Gas 615

8 Rotograte Stoker 1975 Coal Coal 235

9 Fluidized Bed 1989 Petroleum Coke Coal/Fuel Oil 486

PVT-3 Pulp & Paper 1 Pulverized coal 1947 Coal Natural Gas 208

2 Pulverized coal 1952 Coal Natural Gas 208

7 Not Operating

8 Not Operating

10 Stoker 1965 Coal/Bark Natural Gas 300

PVT-4 Pulp & Paper 3 Water Tube NA Residual Oil/Natural Gas Natural Gas 66

4 Water Tube NA #6 Oil/Natural Gas Natural Gas 77

9 Water Tube 1962 Residual Oil/Natural Gas Natural Gas 182

Package Fuel Oil NA 38

PVT-5 Manufacturing Plant 1 

Unit 1 Pacakage 1960 Natural Gas Natural Gas 8.3

Plant 1 

Unit 2 Steam Generator Unk. Natural Gas Natural Gas > 90 psi

Plant 2 

Unit 1 Steam Generator Unk. Natural Gas Natural Gas > 90 psi

Plant 2 

Unit 2 Steam Generator Unk. Natural Gas Natural Gas > 90 psi

PUB-1 Institutional 1 Water Tube 1971 Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil 80

2 Water Tube 1971 Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil 80

3 Water Tube 1971 Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil 40

4 Water Tube 1991 Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil Natural Gas/#2 Fuel Oil 10.4

PUB-2 Institutional 1 Stoker 1949 Coal/Paper pellets Natural Gas 47.5

2 Stoker 1949 Coal/Paper pellets Natural Gas 47.5

3 Stoker 1949 Coal/Paper pellets Natural Gas 47.5

PUB-3 Institutional 1 Water Tube 1955 Coal Natural Gas 59.5

2 Water Tube 1955 Coal/Natural Gas/Oil Natural Gas 59.5

3 Water Tube 1960 Coal/Natural Gas/Oil Natural Gas 71.8

PUB-4 Institutional 1 Water Tube 1968 Natural Gas/#2 Oil Natural Gas/#2 Oil 150

2 Water Tube 1968 Natural Gas/#2 Oil Natural Gas/#2 Oil 150

Notes:

(1) PVT- Private Industry

(2) PUB- Public Facility

(3) See Section 2 of the Sector-Based Pollution Prevention: Toxic Reductions through Energy Efficiency and Conservation Among Industrial Boilers

Page 1 of 1
No. 11-6204.

#### Ismail Pierce, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 960, 132 S. Ct. 434,

181 L. Ed. 2d 288,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7176.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *289Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 637 F.3d 59.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: 

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE 

DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer 

already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, 

appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-46954 of Covista Communications Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No.'s 33-64611, 333-79165, 333-72720, 333-82616, and 333-82620 of Covista
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April 26, 2002 (May 14,
2002 as to Note 21b), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covista
Communications, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
May 14, 2002



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 11-6169.

#### Angel Garcia-Alvarez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 955, 132 S. Ct. 432,

181 L. Ed. 2d 280,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7206.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
JOHN O. WILLIAMS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1454

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Frank E. Sheffield , Judge

.

John O. Williams, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A FFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
#### *Alaska Structures, Inc., Respondent, v. Hedlund, Petitioner,*

No. 90284-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 69349-2-I, April 21, 2014, 180 Wn. App. 591. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
No. 10-1137.

#### Rock for Life-UMBC, et al., Petitioners v. Freeman Hrabowski, et al.

565 U.S. 814, 132 S. Ct. 92,

181 L. Ed. 2d 22,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6807.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 541.
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 15890A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–6880

Mr. Maurice Foye

Vice President

HRL Compliance Solutions, Inc.

2385 F 1/2 Road

Grand Junction, CO 81505

Dear Mr. Foye:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated June 13, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of HRL Compliance Solutions, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from DragonflyAI LLC to HRL 

Compliance Solutions, Inc.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15890

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, HRL Compliance Solutions, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 15890 remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
No. 11-5680.

#### Alfredo Quezada, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 918, 132 S. Ct. 340,

181 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6823.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.39. APPENDIX 8.39**

**SHIPMENT STATUS(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)**

1

APPENDIX 3.39

AP8.39-1

APPENDIX 8.39
# North Boeing Field/Georgetown 

# Steam Plant Site RI/FS Overview: Stormwater Sampling

Report

# Background

• Investigating the storm water as a source of contaminants to Slip 4 of LDW

• Slip 4
- Early Action Area
- EPA CERCLA site;
• Boeing Field is east of Slip 4 (and LDW);
• Boeing Field is under an industrial MSGP
- two points of discharge
- one to the LDW, and another to the City of Seattle’s Stormwater system.



## • This is a follow up study based on the first 

## sampling event in 2008

# Study Summary

• Compared data to the marine AL criteria(whole water samples) and WA sediment standards (SMS)

• WA Sediment Standards are CWA standards
- used for cleanup and CWA purposes;


## • Although permitted
- were not sampling for the COCs associated with the LDW SF site:

– Sampling shows exceedances of PCBs, metals, 

### PAHs

# Logistics of Study

• Storm water samples were collected at 13 locations;
• Sampling efforts began in February
- July 2010;
• Included whole water and filtered suspended 

## solids;
• Analyzed samples for: PAHs, PCB aroclors , metal and mercury, and dioxin/furan 

## congeners

# Chemical Analysis

• Metals compared to WA State’s SMS;

– Endpoint is AL

– SQS: exceedance of this is an exceedance of the WQS;

– CSL: Screening level. 

### • PCBs and PAHs ;compared to the LAET & 2nd LAET:

– Functional equivalent of SQS/CSL

# Results Sampling Whole Water

• Metals: compared to marine WQ criteria
-

– Exceedances for cadmium, copper, lead and zinc



### • PCBs
- detected at several of the sampling sites;

– E.G. conc . range from 0.016
- 0.145 ug /L for stormwater events @ MH108;

– Found exceedances of the criteria 

### • PAHs: HPAHs detected more frequently than LPAHs;

– Found exceedances of the HH WQC (0.018 ug /L);

– Bis (2

- ethylhexyl)phthalate detected at levels that exceed the HH WQC

# Results Summary Filtered Solids

• Total PCBs exceeded the LAET/2LAET in all but one sample;

• Base flow had some of the highest PCB concentrations (25 mg/kg, 22 mg/kg) • PAHs: Phenanthrene frequently excceded LAET/2LAET criteria;

– Total LPAH conc
. ~ 1/10 th the total HPAH. • Dioxins/Furans: detected

no clear pattern of concentrations;
• Metals: exceedances of SMS WQS
-

– Silver (one)

- 160 mg/kg;

– Arsenic;

– Chromium (one);

– Lead (one);

– Mercury (some over 10 mg/kg);

– Zinc (nearly every location);

– Cadmium (nearly every location; greatest @ 78 mg/kg @ 102 mg/kg)

# Additional Data: Surface Solids

• Parking lot sweeps were analyzed
-

– Detected PCBs (0.116

- 0.34 mg/kg) in excess of the SQS
No. 10-10558.

#### Richard Ray Harrimon, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 931, 132 S. Ct. 372,

181 L. Ed. 2d 236,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7037.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 836.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

LAN TU TRINH,

Petitioner

v.

KATHLEEN LIEN TRINH A/K/A LEIN 

BICH TRINH AND LT INTERNATIONAL 

BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 315 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and Petitions for Leave to Amend are DENIED.
No. 10-10528.

#### Roger J. Day, Petitioner v. Minnesota, et al.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 66,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6180.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Exhibit 32.3



Written Statement of the Chief Operating Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.'1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.'1350, I, the undersigned President and Chief Operating Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 5, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mary Lou Fiala     
|Mary Lou Fiala         
|Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2009(the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 9, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-5724.

#### Armando Garcia Rico, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 343,

181 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7029.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*216Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 255.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Renewal of Advisory Committee on Presidential Libraries

    This notice is published in accordance with the provisions of 
section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
5 U.S.C., App.) and advises of the renewal of the National Archives and 
Records Administration's (NARA) Advisory Committee on Presidential 
Libraries. In accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
Circular A-135, OMB approved the inclusion of the Advisory Committee on 
Presidential Libraries in NARA's ceiling of discretionary advisory 
committees. The Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, also concurred with the renewal of the Advisory 
Committee on Presidential Libraries in correspondence dated June 11, 
1998.
    NARA has determined that the renewal of the Advisory Committee is 
in the public interest due to the expertise and valuable advice the 
Committee members provide on issues affecting the functioning of 
existing Presidential libraries and library programs and the 
development of future Presidential libraries. NARA will use the 
Committee's recommendations in its implementation of strategies for the 
efficient operation of the Presidential libraries. NARA's Committee 
Management Officer is Mary Ann Hadyka. She can be reached at 301-713-
7360 x222.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
John W. Carlin,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 98-19608 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 2270** 

JACQUELINE WOODS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CASSANDRA SMITH, Security Personnel; MICHAEL ADU; WILLIAM WASHINGTON, District Manager , Defendants

– Appellees, and
JA

- KIA ANTHONY, Human Resources, Defendant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 00527

- JCC

- IDD )

Submitted : March 16, 2010 Dec ided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jacqueline Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ramapuram, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees
.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Jacqueline Woods appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

erro r. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woods v. Smith , No. 1:09

- cv - 00527

- JCC

- IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2009)
. Additionally, we deny Woods’s motion to strike and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED