alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORM              REGISTRATION NO.     PERTAINING TO JO-ANN STORES, INC.
----              ----------------     ---------------------------------
<S>               <C>               <C>
S-4               333-80763            10 3/8% Senior Subordinated notes Due 2007
S-8               333-10093            1994 Executive Incentive Plan
S-8               33-72445             1998 Incentive Compensation Plan
S-8               33-32809             Employee Savings and Profit Sharing Plan
S-8               33-37355             1990 Employees Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
S-8               33-49690             1990 Employees Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
S-8               333-10087            1990 Employees Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
S-8               333-10091            1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
S-8               333-55278            Nonqualified Stock Option Awards to Certain Employees
S-8               333-55280            Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Savings Plan 401(k)
</TABLE>





Arthur Andersen LLP
Cleveland, Ohio,
May 2, 2002.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy Meeting

agency: United States Information Agency.

action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy will meet on 
July 22 in Room 600, 301 4th Street, SW, Washington, DC, from 9:00 to 
10:00 a.m.
    At the 9:00 a.m. the Commission will meet with Ms. Jan Brambilla, 
Director, Office of Human Resources, USIA, and Mr. Jim Nealon, Foreign 
Service Personnel, USIA, to discuss Foreign Service personnel ``cones'' 
and public diplomacy specialists.

for further information contact: Please call Betty Hayes, (202) 619-
4468, if you are interested in attending the meeting. Space is limited 
and entrance to the building is controlled.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
Rose Royal,
Management Analyst, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-19524 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
No. 11-5347.

#### Wildor Washington, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 300,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5459.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1180.
# 52730001

# 52730002

# 52730003

# 52730004

# 52730005

# 52730006

# 52730007

# 52730008

# 52730009

# 52730010

# 52730011

# 52730012

# 62550013

# image4.emf

# image5.emf

# image6.emf

# image7.emf

# image8.emf

# image9.emf

# image1.emf

# image2.emf

# image3.emf

# image13.emf

# image14.emf

# image15.emf

# image16.emf

# image17.emf

# image18.emf

# image10.emf

# image11.emf

# image12.emf

# image19.png

# image23.emf

# image24.emf

# image25.emf

# image26.emf

# image27.emf

# image28.emf

# image20.emf

# image21.emf

# image22.emf

# image32.emf

# image33.emf

# image34.emf

# image35.emf

# image36.emf

# image37.emf

# image38.emf

# image39.emf

# image40.emf

# image41.emf

# image42.emf

# image43.emf

# image44.emf

# image45.emf

# image46.emf

# image29.emf

# image30.emf

# image31.emf

# image50.emf

# image51.emf

# image52.emf

# image53.emf

# image54.emf

# image55.emf

# image47.emf

# image48.emf

# image49.emf

# image59.emf

# image60.emf

# image61.emf

# image62.emf

# image63.emf

# image64.emf

# image56.emf

# image57.emf

# image58.emf

# image68.emf

# image69.emf

# image70.emf

# image71.emf

# image72.emf

# image73.emf

# image65.emf

# image66.emf

# image67.emf

# image77.emf

# image78.emf

# image79.emf

# image80.emf

# image81.emf

# image82.emf

# image83.emf

# image84.emf

# image85.emf

# image86.emf

# image87.emf

# image88.emf

# image89.emf

# image90.emf

# image91.emf

# image74.emf

# image75.emf

# image76.emf

# image95.emf

# image96.emf

# image97.emf

# image98.emf

# image99.emf

# image100.emf

# image92.emf

# image93.emf

# image94.emf

# image104.emf

# image105.emf

# image106.emf

# image107.emf

# image108.emf

# image109.emf

# image101.emf

# image102.emf

# image103.emf

# image113.emf

# image114.emf

# image115.emf

# image116.emf

# image117.emf

# image118.emf

# image110.emf

# image111.emf

# image112.emf

# image122.emf

# image123.emf

# image124.emf

# image125.emf

# image126.emf

# image127.emf

# image119.emf

# image120.emf

# image121.emf

# image131.emf

# image132.emf

# image133.emf

# image134.emf

# image135.emf

# image136.emf

# image128.emf

# image129.emf

# image130.emf
No. 11-5630.

#### Benjamin J. Wherry, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 335,

181 L. Ed. 2d 209,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5932.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2013298EN.01001103.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/11

---

Order of the General Court of 14 August 2013 — Nordex Holding v OHIM — Fontana Food (Taverna MEDITERRANEAN WHITE CHEESE)

(Case T-301/13) (1)

1

2013/C 298/20

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
No. 11-5817.

#### Damon T. Wilson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 965, 132 S. Ct. 456,

181 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7515.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10011.

#### Kevin Grant, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 931, 132 S. Ct. 371,

181 L. Ed. 2d 236,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7023,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 803.
No. 11-6389.

#### Geronimo Hernandez-Herrera, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 969, 132 S. Ct. 469,

181 L. Ed. 2d 306,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7573.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 382.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF REGISTRANT FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         291,000
<SECURITIES>                                25,982,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,557,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   177,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         687,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,597,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,835,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,102,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,597,000
<SALES>                                     18,851,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,925,000
<CGS>                                       17,817,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,007,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               146,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,918,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,040,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,371,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,827,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK>                         0000032379
<NAME>                        Elizabethtown Water Company & Subsidiary

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      650,771
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,337
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          50,023
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        33,056
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 741,187
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      141,090
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             63,630
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 220,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,969
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              51,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       12,873
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      481
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 211,903
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  741,187
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      138,306
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,116
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      90,136
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     101,252
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         37,054
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 853
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  37,907
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        16,502
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,405
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        813
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   20,592
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        17,526
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,661
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          32,579
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
All amounts in thousands of dollars.
</FN>

</TABLE>
No. 10-10694.

#### Ronald Buzzard, Jr., Petitioner v. Timothy Wengler, Warden.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 160,

181 L. Ed. 2d 74,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6121.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*75Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 373.
No. 10-10629.

#### Amos Vaughan, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 85,

181 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6747.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Converted by EDGARwiz


EXHIBIT 10.2




DEBT CONVERSION AGREEMENT




This Debt Conversion Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of June 30, 2014 by and between INVENT Ventures, Inc. (“Invent”) and Aeon Multi-Opportunity Fund I, LLC (“Note Holder”).




RECITALS




·

On January 14, 2013, Invent issued a $110,000 Promissory Note (“Note”) to Threshold Financial, LLC (“Threshold”) that paid interest of 12% and matured on January 14, 2014.




·

In January of 2014, Invent and Threshold amended the Note to extend the maturity date an additional year to January 14, 2015.




·

On April 17, 2014, Threshold sold the Note with a balance of $114,339.73 including unpaid principle and accrued interest to Note Holder for $95,000.  




·

On June 30, 2014, the total balance of unpaid principle and interest due on the Note is equal to $117,046.29.




·

On June 30, 2014, Invent and Note Holder both desire to convert the total balance due on the Note into shares of Invent common stock at a price equal to Invent’s current Net Asset Value per Share.




TERMS OF THE DEBT CONVERSION




1.

Note Holder will convert $117,046.25 of the Debt, equal to the entire unpaid balance of the Note into shares of Invent common stock at a price of $0.14 per share




2.

Invent will issue 836,045 shares of Invent common stock to Aeon to pay off the unpaid balance of the Note.




3.

Upon issuance of the 836,045 by Invent to Note Holder the Note will be fully-paid and extinguished.   





























































SIGNATURES




By affixing their respective signatures hereto, the Parties do hereby agree to be bound by the terms set forth herein




Note Holder

INVENT Ventures, Inc.

/s/ Aeon Multi-Opportunity Fund I LLC

/s/ Bryce Knight

Aeon Multi-Opportunity Fund I LLC

Bryce Knight, CEO
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0667 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-062-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 11-5027.

#### Antonio A. Andrews, Petitioner v. Missouri.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 260,

181 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6213.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.

*152Same case below, 329 S.W.3d 369.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,228
<SECURITIES>                                       501
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     37,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,780
<PP&E>                                         230,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 476,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,220
<BONDS>                                        290,240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   476,467
<SALES>                                        183,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,213
<CGS>                                          137,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,563
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-175.

#### Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Jonathan Andrew Doody.

565 U.S. 959, 132 S. Ct. 414,

181 L. Ed. 2d 287,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7217.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Alito would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 986.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19639]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket 95-116; DA 98-1265]


Telephone Number Portability

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; approval of provisioning method and extension of 
deadlines.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that In the Matter of Telephone Number 
Portability, Common Carrier Docket No. 95-116, DA 98-1265, released 
June 26, 1998, Cincinnati Bell Telephone's (CBT's) provision of Local 
Number Portability (LNP) in the Cincinnati Metropolitan Statistical 
Area (MSA) by choosing only the Midwest Number Portability 
Administration Center is approved. This action is needed so CBT can 
efficiently implement LNP in the Cincinnati MSA. The intended effect of 
this action is to reduce LNP implementation costs and complexity for 
CBT and other carriers in the Cincinnati MSA. Notice is also given that 
several carriers' requests for delays in the implementation of Phase 
III and Phase IV LNP are granted. In addition, the Commission grants 
AT&T Corp.'s and Time Warner Communications Holdings, Inc.'s related 
petitions to waive the requirements that carriers file petitions to 
extend the time to file an LNP implementation extension request 60 days 
prior to the deadline for which an extension is sought. These actions 
are needed because carriers seek more time to implement LNP due to 
circumstances beyond their control. The intended effect of these grants 
is to allow carriers more time to implement LNP without threatening 
network reliability.
    A copy of the order is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Common Carrier Bureau, Network Services Division, Room 
235, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., Monday through Thursday, 
8:30 AM to 3:00 PM (closed 12:30 to 1:30 PM) and the FCC Reference 
Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., daily, from 
9:00 AM to 4:30 PM.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jared Carlson, (202) 418-2350, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8be1e8eaf9e7f8e4e5cbede8e8a5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb4bdbfacb2adb1b09eb8bdbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>, or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-7061, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f6f79706d6c6b7a6d5f797c7c31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a5a4c4558595e4f586a4c4949044d455c">[email protected]</span></a> 
at the Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau.

Federal Communications Commission.
Anna M. Gomez,
Deputy Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19639 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>