alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLA Form 2017, FEB 2013 (Formerly DLAE 1890. All other versions obsolete) DLA (PDF)

AS OF DATE FORM APPROVED

CONTRACTOR BULK LIQUID FACILITIES REPORT OMB TO 119-ROO26

NAME OF FIRM TERMINAL NAME, ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE

NEAREST CITY OR TOWN AND STATE DISTANCE DIRECTION ROUTE NUMBER TERMINAL PHONE NO.

TERMINAL TRAFFIC MANAGER HOME PHONE NO. ASST. TERMINAL TRAFFIC MANAGER HOME PHONE NO.

NAME OF PIPELINE SERVING TERMINAL LINE SIZE NORMAL WORK DAYS NORMAL WORK HOURS

BULK PRODUCTS SHIPPING CAPABILITY

GRADE

(Insert Bulk Product

Handled) >

NO. OF NO. OF NO. OF NO. OF NO. OF SHIP SHIP SHIP SHIP SHIP CATEGORY LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING

SPOTS SPOTS SPOTS SPOTS SPOTS

TANK CARS

MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TANK TRUCKS THAT CAN BE LOADED

CATEGORY 8 HRS 16 HRS 24 HRS 8 HRS 16 IIRS 24 HRS 8 HRS 16 HRS 24 HRS 8 HRS 16 HRS 24 HRS 8 HRS 16 HRS 24 HRS

TANK CARS

TANK TRUCK

MAXIMUM SHIPPING RATES IN BARRELS PER HOUR

IS RECIPROCAL NO. OF SWITCHES TIME OF DAY SWITCHING IS PERFORMED ARE SWITCHES PERFORMED BY

T HE RAILROAD ADEQUATE TO

MEET YOUR NEEDS?

SWITCHING IN

EFFECT?

HOW MANY TANK CARS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON TRACK AGE 10,000 GALLON TANK CARS 20,000 GALLON TANK CARS

OTHER THAN THOSE IN POSITION FOR LOADING?

WHERE BOTH TT AND TC FACILITIES AVAILABLE, STATE ANY LIMITATION FOR SHIPPING BY ONE OR BOTH MODES

MAXIMUM BARGE SIZE YOUR FACILITY CAN HANDLE MAXIMUM TANKER SIZE YOUR FACILITY CAN HANDLE

CARGO CAPACITY: DRAFT: CARGO CAPACITY: DRAFT:

LENGTH: BEAM,: LENGTH: BEAM:

CAN YOU LOAD BY ALL MODES SIMULTANEOUSLY? IF ''NO'' STATE WHAT MODES CAN BE LOADED SIMULTANEOUSLY

NO

FURTHER INFORMATION THAT CAN BE FURNISHED TO ASSIST IN ROUTING (Continue on reverse side if necessary)

TYPED NAME OF TERMINAL MANAGER TELEPHONE NO. SIGNATURE DATE

RAILHEAD TRUCK SHIPPING POINT

RAILROAD(S) SERVING TERMINAL BARGE AND TANKER SHIPPING POINT

YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

10,000

20,000

TANK TRUCK

BARGE

TANKER

PIPELINE

10,000

20.000

BARGE

TANKER

PIPELINE

YES

NO

YES

NO

YES
DLA Form 2017, FEB 2013 (Formerly DLAE 1890. All other versions obsolete) DLA (PDF)

Specify operating hours for berthing and loading

Specify maximum ballast receiving capability. (See Claus F52.11)

TANKER/BARGE FACILITY RESTRICTIONS

Specify any other port restrictions that would apply to a vessel loading at the facility (i.e., height restrictions from vessel

waterline to vessel manifold; vessel deadweight tonnage (DWT); requirements for inert gas systems (IGS), vapor control

hook-ups, closed loading and vessel inspections; etc.)
CERTIFICATION                       EXHIBIT 31
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brian M. Overstreet, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sagient Research
     Systems, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision
          to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
          including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
          within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
          adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2005

/s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
-----------------------------
Brian M. Overstreet
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

                                       21
================================================================================
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee

Senator Joseph Minard, Cochair

Delegate Bonnie Brown, Cochair

Debra A. Graham, Chief Counsel

Felisha N. Sutherland, Administrative Assistant

Connie A. Bowling, Associate Counsel

Rita A. Pauley, Associate Counsel

Brian Skinner, Associate Counsel

Charles Roskovensky, Associate Counsel

January 12, 2009 i\

,. '"

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING REVIEW COMMITTEE

TO: Betty Ireland, Secretary of State, State Register

TO: John A. Benedict, Director

DEP - Air Quality

601 - 57th Street, SE

Charleston, WV 25304

FROM: Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee

Proposed Rule: Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major

Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of

Significant, 45CSR14

The Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee Recommends that the West Virginia

Legislature:

1. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule:

(A) as originally filed

(B) as modified by the agency

2. Authorize the agency to promulgate part of the Legisla~ive rule;

a statement of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

3. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule with

certain amendments; amendments and a statement of reasons for

such recommendation is attached.

4. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule as

modified with certain amendments; amendments and a statement

of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

5. Recommends that the Legislature rule be withdrawn; a statement

of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

Building 1, Room MB-49

Phone: (304) 347-4840

1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston, WV 25305

Fax: (304) 347-4901 emait:fetishas@mail.wvnet.edu
No. 11-78.

#### Real Estate Innovations, Inc., Petitioner v. Houston Association of Realtors, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 881, 132 S. Ct. 249,

181 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5800.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 344.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 17, 2020

No. 04-19-00718-CV

VR PARTNERS I, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

MIDTEX OIL, L.P. and Juniper Ventures of Texas, LLC,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-0448-CV-C

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Post Submission Brief is hereby 

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on March 17, 2020.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ

 Clerk of Court
No. 11-5242.

#### Wesley Lynn Ruiz, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 946, 132 S. Ct. 402,

181 L. Ed. 2d 263,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7327.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2007
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ David R. Asplund
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 071098G]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's Groundfish Management 
Team will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, August 10, beginning at 1 
p.m. and may go into the evening until business for the day is 
completed. The meeting will reconvene from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, 
August 11, Wednesday, August 12, and Thursday, August 13, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science 
Center Facility, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Room 2079, Building 4, 
Seattle, WA; telephone: (206) 526-6150.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth 
Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Glock, Groundfish Fishery 
Management Coordinator; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The first day of the meeting will be 
dedicated to reevaluation of the appropriateness of F<INF>40%</INF> as 
the proxy for maximum sustainable yield for rockfish. Agenda items 
scheduled also include review of recent stock assessments, development 
of preliminary recommendations for 1999 harvest levels and management 
measures, inseason management projections, final review of fishery 
management plan amendments, preliminary preparation of the annual stock 
assessment and fishery evaluation (SAFE) document, a proposal to allow 
landing of fish in excess of cumulative limits (overages), lingcod and 
rockfish allocation, research and data needs, and stocks to be assessed 
in 1999.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Team for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be of 
formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those 
issues specifically identified in the agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. John Rhoton at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: July 13, 1998.
Bruce Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-19011 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information obtained from The Corporate
Executive Board Company interim condensed unaudited financial statements as of
and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,478                  15,478
<SECURITIES>                                    37,270                  37,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,820                   8,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,860                  41,860
<PP&E>                                          13,126                  13,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,479                 112,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,285                  59,285
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           155                     155
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,114                  52,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,479                 112,479
<SALES>                                         22,612                  43,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,612                  43,396
<CGS>                                            8,372                  16,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,122                  34,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,936                  10,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,316                   4,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,620                   6,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,620                   6,308
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23                    0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21                    0.37



</TABLE>
No. 11-98.

#### Marie Toomer, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 882, 132 S. Ct. 251,

181 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5321.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 1233.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dennis N. Beal, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ DENNIS N. BEAL                                      
| |                                                         
| | Dennis N. Beal                                          
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

February 9, 2004
#### In the Matter of Ariel A. Castillo, Appellant, v Cynthia Muniz, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Cynthia Muniz, Respondent, v Ariel A. Castillo, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[54 NYS3d 711]—

Appeal by the father from an amended order of the Family Court, Kings County (Dean T. Kusakabe, J.), dated January 7, 2016. The amended order, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition for sole physical custody of the parties’ younger child.

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“ ‘The court’s paramount concern in any custody dispute is to determine, under the totality of the circumstances, what is in the best interests of the child’ ” *(Matter of Gooler v Gooler,*107 AD3d 712, 712 [2013], quoting *Matter of Julie v Wills,*73 AD3d 777, 777 [2010]; *see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]). In determining an initial petition for child custody, the court must consider, among other things, “(1) which alternative will best promote stability; (2) the available home environments; (3) the past performance of each parent; (4) each parent’s relative fitness, including his or her ability to guide the child, provide for the child’s overall well being, and foster the child’s relationship with the noncustodial parent; and (5) the child’s desires” *(Matter of Supangkat v Torres,*101 AD3d 889, 890 [2012]). Custody determinations depend to a great extent upon an assessment of the character and credibility of the parties and witnesses *(see Matter of Gooler v Gooler,*107 AD3d at 712). The Family Court’s custody determinations will not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see id.; see also Matter of Frankiv v Kalitka,*105 AD3d 1045 [2013]).

*962Here, the Family Court properly weighed all of the factors in awarding sole physical custody of the parties’ younger child to the mother. The court, after evaluating the testimony, interviewing the child in camera, and considering the position of the attorney for the child, determined that the child’s best interests would be served by an award of sole physical custody to the mother *(see Matter of Andrews v Mouzon,*80 AD3d 761, 763 [2011]). That determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, and we decline to disturb it *(see id.*at 763; *Matter of Guzman v Pizarra,*102 AD3d 964 [2013]).

Rivera, J.P., Hall, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
No. 10-10851.

#### Travaris T. Guy, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 180,

181 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6042.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19170]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 20


Stay of Interim Rule for Global Package Link to Germany and 
France

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Stay of interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service is staying its recently published interim 
rule on Global Package Link which added a merchandise return service 
for customers utilizing the GPL service to Germany and France.

DATES: The amendment to the International Mail Manual published in the 
Federal Register on July 10, 1998 (63 FR 37251-37254), is stayed until 
further notice as of 12:01 a.m. on July 17, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Any written comments should be mailed or delivered to the 
International Business Unit, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza 
SW, room 370-IBU, Washington, DC 20260-6500. Copies of all written 
comments will be available for public inspection and photocopying 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Brandt (202) 314-7165.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pending further internal review, the Postal 
Service is staying an interim rule in the Federal Register on July 10, 
1998 (63 FR 37251-37254), concerning the establishment of a GPL return 
service in Germany and France. This stay will be effective immediately, 
and the contemplated service will not be available until the internal 
review has been completed and a further notice published.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 20

    International postal service, Foreign relations.

    The Postal Service hereby stays its amendment of July 10, 1998, to 
the International Mail Manual, which is incorporated by reference in 
the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 20.1.

PART 20--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 20 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 401, 404, 407, 408.

    I. Subchapter 620 of the International Mail Manual, Issue 20, 
sections 626.24 and 626.25, are stayed until further notice.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 98-19170 Filed 7-15-98; 10:40 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P