alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2652 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2652

   To require the use of voting machines manufactured in the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2019

  Mr. Pocan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the use of voting machines manufactured in the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure American-Made Voting Machines 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF VOTING MACHINES MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 
21081(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Voting machine requirements.--By not later than the 
        date of the regularly scheduled general election for Federal 
        office occurring in November 2022, each State shall seek to 
        ensure that any voting machine used in such election and in any 
        subsequent election for Federal office is manufactured in the 
        United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Squire Sanders (US) LLP
1200 19th Street, NW

Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036

O +1 202 626 6600

F +1 202 626 6780
squiresanders.com

Edward W. Sauer

T +1 202 626 6641 edward.sauer@squiresanders.com

356357/1/WASHINGTON May 23, 2014

Via Email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. for an Exemption Authorizing Seasonal Service Between Portland, Oregon and San Jose del Cabo and Puerto Vallarta, Mexico; Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0078

Dear Mr. Kruger:

This letter is to advise t hat Alaska has polled all of the carriers on the service list attached to the application referenced above and there are no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the application for exemption be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Edward W. Sauer

cc: info@airlineinfo.com
Presidential Documents

3445

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 14

Thursday, January 22, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Notice of January 21, 1998

Continuation of Emergency Regarding Terrorists Who

Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process

On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, I declared a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by

grave acts of violence committed by foreign terrorists that disrupt the Middle

East peace process. By Executive Order 12947 of January 23, 1995, I blocked

the assets in the United States, or in the control of United States persons,

of foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process.

I also prohibited transactions or dealings by United States persons in such

property. In 1996 and 1997, I transmitted notices of the continuation of

this national emergency to the Congress and the Federal Register. Last

year’s notice of continuation was published in the Federal Register on

January 22, 1997. Because terrorist activities continue to threaten the Middle

East peace process and vital interests of the United States in the Middle

East, the national emergency declared on January 23, 1995, and the measures

that took effect on January 24, 1995, to deal with that emergency must

continue in effect beyond January 23, 1998. Therefore, in accordance with

section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am

continuing the national emergency with respect to foreign terrorists who

threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted

[FR Doc. 98–1756

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 21, 1998.

to the Congress.

œ–

Filed 1–21–98; 11:51 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
No. 10-506.

#### Josefina Cruz, Petitioner v. New York City Department of Education, et al.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 830,

178 L. Ed. 2d 558,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9789.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 82.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Wisconsin State Advisory Council; Public Hearing

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Wisconsin State Advisory 
Council, located in the geographical area of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, will 
hold a public meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m., July 16, 1998 at 
Metro Milwaukee Area Chamber (MMAC) Association of Commerce Building; 
756 North Milwaukee Street, Fourth Floor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin to 
discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. 
Small Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Yolanda Lassiter, U.S. Small 
Business Administration, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 
53203; (414) 297-1092.

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
Shirl Thomas,
Director, Office of External Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-19237 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            NOV-29-1997
<CASH>                                    4,574,000
<SECURITIES>                             66,068,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            29,772,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                900,000
<INVENTORY>                              28,270,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        129,835,000
<PP&E>                                  113,194,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           83,185,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          163,524,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    17,817,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  1,315,000
<OTHER-SE>                              136,577,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            163,524,000
<SALES>                                 160,935,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        160,935,000
<CGS>                                   137,389,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           137,389,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           65,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          13,529,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              4,135,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       9,394,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              9,394,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.65
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-6.

#### Allan Deon Wease, Petitioner v. Wyoming.

565 U.S. 878, 132 S. Ct. 241,

181 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5277.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Wyoming, Uinta County, denied.
Exhibit 23.1

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-26659 and 33-60696) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated 1997
Stock Option Plan and the Reliability Incorporated Employee Stock Savings Plan and Trust, respectively, of our report dated March 31, 2008, with respect to the 2007 consolidated financial statements of Reliability Incorporated included in the
Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Fitts, Roberts & Co., P.C.
|                              
|Houston, Texas                
|March 27, 2009
**Action Item Tracker – Joint Supply, SDR, JPIWG PRC 17-2 Meeting (November 15-16, 2017)**

**Current as of October 4, 2019**

Joint PRC 17-2 Minutes: http://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/Archives/supply/ 

Page **4** of **4**
85

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Delaware

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $13.0 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 1,400

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 17,200

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $532 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $126.0 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $26.7 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $152.7 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 9%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$3.4 $4.3 $3.71 $4.69

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$2.0 $2.8 $2.18 $3.05

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $2.7 $4.2 $2.94 $4.58

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$0.8 $1.1 $0.88 $1.23

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.4 $0.6 $0.44 $0.62

TOTAL $9.3 $13.0 $10.15 $14.17

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
No. 10-11163.

#### In re Dwayne Anthony Johnson, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 391,

181 L. Ed. 2d 245,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6445.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
111

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

North Carolina

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $99.3 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 14,200

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 180,000

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $3,810 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $294.8 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $141.0 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $435.8 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 23%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$26.4 $33.1 $2.71 $3.39

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$6.8 $9.8 $0.70 $1.00

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $27.1 $43.5 $2.78 $4.46

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$6.0 $8.6 $0.62 $0.89

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$3.0 $4.3 $0.31 $0.44

TOTAL $69.3 $99.3 $7.12 $10.18

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38784-38785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-109; RM-9282]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Superior, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Windy 
Valley Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 293C at 
Superior, Wyoming, as the community's first local aural transmission 
service. Channel 293C can be allotted to Shoshoni in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city 
reference coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 293C at Superior are 
North Latitude 41-46-12 and West Longitude 108-58-12.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as

[[Page 38785]]

follows: A. Wray Fitch, III, Esq., Gammon & Grange, P.C., 8280 
Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-3807( Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-109, adopted July 1, 
1998, and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19308 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
No. 11-5966.

#### Henry Uliomereyon Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 358,

181 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6752.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 670.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296]


Tennessee Valley Authority; Notice of Issuance of Amendment to 
Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has 
issued Amendment Nos. 234, 253 and 212 to Facility Operating License 
Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68 issued to the Tennessee Valley Authority 
(TVA or the licensee) for operation of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 
(BFN), Units 1, 2 and 3, respectively, located in Limestone County, 
Alabama.
    The amendments implement a full conversion from the current 
Technical Specifications (TS) to a set of TS based on NUREG-1433, 
Revision 1, ``Standard Technical Specifications for General Electric 
Plants, BWR/4,'' dated April 1995. The application for the amendments 
complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act 
of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's rules and 
regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required 
by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter 
I, which are set forth in the license amendments.
    Notices of consideration of Issuance of Amendments to facility 
Operating License and Opportunity for Hearing in connection with this 
action were published in the Federal Register on October 23, 1996 (61 
FR 55026), June 1, 1998 (63 FR 29763) and June 12, 1998 (63 FR 32252). 
No request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene was filed 
following these notices.
    The Commission has prepared an Environmental assessment to the 
action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement. Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has 
concluded that the issuance of the amendments will not have a 
significant impact on the quality of the human environment (63 FR 
34944).
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendments dated September 6, 1996, as supplemented May 
1, August 14, November 5 and 14, December 3, 4, 11, 22, 23, 29 and 30, 
1997, January 23, March 12, April 16, 20 and 28, and May 7, 14, 19 and 
27, and June 2, 5, 10 and 19, 1998,, which are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC and at the local public 
document room located at the Athens Public Library, 405 E. South 
Street, Athens, Alabama.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of July, 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frederick J. Hebdon,
Project Director, Project Directorate II-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-19224 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 11-13.

#### Cynthia Kartman, et al., Petitioners v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al.

565 U.S. 878, 132 S. Ct. 242,

181 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5288.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 883.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

LAND AND MARITIME
P.O. BOX 3980
COLUMBUS, OHIO 43218-3990

SEP 1 1 2014

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: DLA Statement to Industry - DNA Marking

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is firmly committed to meeting the electronic
component requirement needs of our warfighters by providing the highest quality parts at the best
possible price. We remain aggressive in our efforts to prevent counterfeit electronic parts from
entering into DLA’s supply chain and are constantly evaluating our counterfeit electronics detection
and avoidance programs.

With our Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Marking Program reaching its second year, DLA is
pleased to announce that DNA marking will continue to be an integral part of DLA’s comprehensive
program to deter and detect counterfeit microcircuits in Federal Supply Class (FSC) 5962. DLA is
also pleased to report that on 15 December 2014, DLA will no longer issue solicitations requiring
suppliers to provide DNA marked FSC 5962 microcircuits. Instead, DLA’s Electronics Test
Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio will DNA mark all FSC 5962 microcircuits.

This change will create a centralized, streamlined DNA marking process within DLA, reduce
the overall cost of the marking initiative, and will ensure maximum participation of our industry
partners in supplying FSC 5962 microcircuits to DLA. DLA will also no longer reimburse suppliers
the cost for new licensing and other costs associated with DNA marking. DLA will work with
Applied DNA Sciences to extend supplier licenses as necessary to allow for delivery of contracts
awarded prior to 15 December 2014. DLA will reimburse suppliers for additional ink and QA testing
of the DNA mark to support marking requirements for contracts awarded prior to 15 December 2014.

As part of the transition, suppliers will be required to provide DLA traceability
documentation to the original component manufacturer for every contract award and purchase order.
When traceability documentation is not available, a supplier must be qualified under DLA’s
Qualified Testing Suppliers’ List (QTSL) to be competitive for a DLA contract award or purchase
request.

We want to thank you for your participation in this initiative to date and we look forward to
working with you in making this a successful transition.

Point of contact for this action is Mr. Todd Lewis, Director, Engineering and Technical
Support Directorate, (614) 692-3251 or email: todd.lewis@dla.mil.

(a

J. G. KING
RDML, SC, USN
Commander