Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 139 /Tuesday, July 21, 1998 / Notices 39107

1 19 U.S.C. 1675(b). 2 19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(2)(A).

Sec. 12, E1⁄2 and portion of W1⁄2 outside

Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 13, portion of E1⁄2 and NE1⁄4NW1⁄4

outside Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

T. 12 N., R. 9 W.,

Sec. 5, portion of SW1⁄4 lying southwest of

Hwy 93;

Sec. 6, lots 3 to 6 incl., E1⁄2SW1⁄4, and

portion lot 2 and SE1⁄4 southwest of Hwy

93;

Sec. 7, lots 1 to 4, incl., E1⁄2, E1⁄2W1⁄2;

Sec. 8, portion lying southwest of Hwy 93;

Sec. 17, All;

Sec. 18, lots 1 to 3, incl., NE1⁄4, E1⁄2NW1⁄4,

and portion of lot 4 and S1⁄2 outside of

Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 19, portion of E1⁄2 and E1⁄2NW1⁄4

outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 20, All;

Sec. 26, portion of S1⁄2NW1⁄4 and S1⁄2 lying

southwest of Hwy 93;

Sec. 29, lots 1 to 6, incl., E1⁄2E1⁄2,

SW1⁄4SE1⁄4, and portion of W1⁄2W1⁄2 and

SE1⁄4SW1⁄4 outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 30, portion of E1⁄2NE1⁄4 outside of

Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 35, portion of NE1⁄4 lying southwest of

Hwy 93, and portion of W1⁄2 and SE1⁄4

outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 36, portion of W1⁄2 and SE1⁄4 lying

southwest of Hwy 93.

T. 13 N., R. 9 W.,

Sec. 5, lots 1 to 4, incl., S1⁄2N1⁄2, S1⁄2;

Sec. 6, lots 1 to 7, incl., S1⁄2NE1⁄4,

SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4, SE1⁄4;

Sec. 7, lots 1 to 7, incl., E1⁄2, E1⁄2W1⁄2;

Sec. 8, All;

Sec. 31, lots 3, 4, and portion of lots 1, 2,

E1⁄2W1⁄2 and SE1⁄4 southwest of Hwy 93.

T. 14 N., R. 9 W.,

Sec. 30, lots 1 to 4, incl., E1⁄2, E1⁄2W1⁄2

(including MS 4578 within sec.);

Sec. 31, lots 1 to 4, incl., E1⁄2, E1⁄2W1⁄2;

Sec. 32, W1⁄2, W1⁄2SE1⁄4.

T. 12 N., R. 10 W.,

Sec. 3, lots 1 to 4, incl., and portion of S1⁄2

outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 4, lot 1, and portion of lots 2, 3, 4, and

SE1⁄4 outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 5, portion of lots 1 to 4 outside of

Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 6, portion of lots 1, 2, and SE1⁄4

outside of Arrastra Mountain

Wilderness;

Sec. 10, portion of NE1⁄4NE1⁄4NE1⁄4 outside

of Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 11, portion of N1⁄2N1⁄2 outside of

Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 12, E1⁄2, and portion of W1⁄2 outside

of Arrastra Mountain Wilderness;

Sec. 13, portion of N1⁄2 and SE1⁄4 outside

of Arrastra Mountain Wilderness.

T. 13 N., R. 10 W.,

Sec. 2, lots 1 to 5, incl., lot 7, S1⁄2N1⁄2, and

E1⁄2SE;

Sec. 16, All;

Secs. 32 to 35, incl.

T. 14 N., R. 10 W.,

Sec. 6, lots 1 to 7, incl., S1⁄2NE1⁄4,

SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4;

Sec. 23, All;

Sec. 24, S1⁄2;

Sec. 31, lots 1 to 4, incl., E1⁄2, E1⁄2W1⁄2;

Secs. 32 to 34, incl., and sec. 36.

All descriptions according to the

official plats on file at the Bureau of

Land Management.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At 9 a.m.

on August 20, 1998 the lands described

above will be opened to entry under the

general mining laws and the mineral

leasing laws, subject to valid existing

rights and requirements of applicable

laws. Opening these lands to mineral

entry is in conformance with the

Kingman Field Office Resource

Management Plan, as amended and

approved March 7, 1995. Appropriation

of the above-described lands under the

general mining laws or mineral leasing

laws prior to the date and time of

restoration is unauthorized. Any such

attempted appropriation, including

attempted adverse possession under 30

U.S.C. 38 shall vest no rights against the

United States. Acts required to establish

a location and to initiate a right of

possession are governed by State law

where not in conflict with Federal laws.

The Bureau of Land Management will

not intervene in disputes between rival

locators over possessory rights since

Congress has provided for such

determinations in local courts. All

applications and offers received prior to

9 a.m. on August 20, 1998, will be

considered as simultaneously filed as of

that time and date. Applications and

offers received thereafter shall be

considered in the order of filing. The

above-described lands remain closed to

all other forms of appropriation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Thompson, Geologist, or Janna Paronto,

Land Law Examiner, Kingman Field

Office, Bureau of Land Management,

2475 Beverly Avenue, Kingman, AZ

86401–3629, (520) 692–4400.

Dated: July 9, 1998.

Mary Jo Yoas,

Supervisor, Lands and Minerals Operations.

[FR Doc. 98–19320 Filed 7–20–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–32–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Silicon Metal From Argentina, Brazil,

and China

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission (Commission).

ACTION: Request for comments regarding

the institution of section 751(b) review

investigations concerning the

Commission’s affirmative

determinations in the following

investigations:

Country

Action taken by the Commission Action taken by the Dept. of Commerce

Investigation

No.

Determination

publication date

Federal Register citation Order No. Date of order Federal Register citation

Argentina ...................................... 731–TA–470 ... 09/25/91 56 FR 48577 .. A–357–804 ..... 09/26/91 56 FR 48779

Brazil ............................................. 731–TA–471 ... 08/07/91 56 FR 37572 .. A–351–806 ..... 07/31/91 56 FR 36135

China ............................................ 731–TA–472 ... 06/12/91 56 FR 27033 .. A–570–806 ..... 06/10/91 56 FR 26649

SUMMARY: The Commission invites

comments from the public on whether

changed circumstances exist sufficient

to warrant the institution of

investigations pursuant to section 751(b)

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act),1 to

review the affirmative determinations of

the Commission in the above

investigations. The purpose of the

proposed review investigations is to

determine whether revocation of the

existing antidumping orders on imports

of silicon metal from Argentina, Brazil,

and China is likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury.2 Silicon metal is provided for in

subheadings 2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

the United States.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred

Fischer (202–205–3179) or Vera Libeau

(202–205–3176), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain

information on this matter by contacting

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the
39108 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 139 /Tuesday, July 21, 1998 / Notices

3 19 U.S.C. 1675(b).

4 19 CFR 207.45(b).

5 19 CFR 201.8.

6 19 CFR 201.6.

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server at http://

www.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 23, 1998, the Commission

received a request to review its

affirmative determinations concerning

silicon metal from Argentina, Brazil,

and China (the request), in light of

changed circumstances, pursuant to

section 751(b) of the Act.3 The request

was filed by counsel on behalf of

General Motors Corp. (GM), Detroit, MI.

GM is an importer of silicon metal.

The alleged changed circumstances in

the request include: (1) Structural

changes in demand for silicon metal

since the original investigations, (2) the

development of evidence regarding a

silicon metal price-fixing conspiracy,

and (3) the extent to which price fixing

in the ferrosilicon market may have

affected the Commission’s silicon metal

investigations and determinations.

Written Comments Requested

Pursuant to section 207.45(b) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure,4 the Commission requests

comments concerning whether the

alleged changed circumstances are

sufficient to warrant institution of

review investigations.

Written Submissions

In accordance with section 201.8 of

the Commission’s rules,5 the signed

original and 14 copies of all written

submissions must be filed with the

Secretary to the Commission, 500 E

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436. All

comments must be filed no later than

August 21, 1998, which is at least 30

days after the date of publication of this

notice in the Federal Register. The

Commission’s determination regarding

initiation of review investigations is due

within 30 days of the close of the

comment period. Any person desiring to

submit a document (or portion thereof)

to the Commission in confidence must

request business confidential treatment

under section 201.6 of the Commission’s

rules.6 Such requests should be directed

to the Secretary to the Commission and

must include a full statement of the

reasons why the Commission should

grant such treatment. Each sheet must

be clearly marked at the top

‘‘Confidential Business Information.’’

The Commission will either accept the

submission in confidence or return it.

All nonconfidential written submissions

will be available for public inspection in

the Office of the Secretary.

Copies of the non-confidential version

of the request and any other documents

in this matter are available for public

inspection during regular business

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the

Office of the Secretary to the

Commission; telephone 202–205–2000.

Issued: July 15, 1998.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–19357 Filed 7–20–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation and Liability Act of 1980

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and 42 U.S.C.

9622(d)(2), notice is hereby given that

on July 9, 1998, a Consent Decree was

lodged in United States v. Dixie-Narco,

et al., Civil Action No. MJG–96–3310,

with the United States District Court for

the District of Maryland.

The Consent Decree resolves claims

against George P. Garratt III under

Section 107 of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, with

respect to the Drumco Superfund Site

(‘‘Drumco Site’’) located in Baltimore

and in Anne Arundel County,

Maryland. Pursuant to the terms of the

Consent Decree, Garratt is required to

sell the Site property, and upon

completion of the sale, pay a minimum

of 65 percent of the proceeds, or

$140,000 whichever is greater, to the

United States.

The Department of Justice will receive

comments relating to the proposed

Consent Decree for a period of thirty

days from the date of publication of this

notice. Comments should be addressed

to the Assistant Attorney General,

Environmental and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530, and should

refer to United States v. Dixie-Narco, et

al., Civil Action No. MJG–96–3310, Ref.

No. 90–11–2–1140. The proposed

Consent Decree may be examined at the

office of the United States Attorney,

District of Maryland, 604 United States

Courthouse, 101 W. Lombard Street,

Baltimore, Maryland. Copies of the

Consent Decree may also be examined

and obtained by mail at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202–

624–0892) and the offices of the

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

When requesting a copy by mail, please

enclose a check in the amount of $9.00

(twenty-five cents per page reproduction

costs) for the Consent Decree, payable to

the ‘‘Consent Decree Library.’’

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 98–19384 Filed 7–20–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

Notice is hereby given that a proposed

Consent Decree (‘‘Decree’’) in United

States v. Lamb-Weston, Inc., Civil

Action No. 98–0280–S–LMB, was

lodged on July 1, 1998, with the United

States District Court for the District of

Idaho.

The complaint alleges that defendant

Lamb-Weston, Inc. (‘‘Lamb-Weston’’)

violated the New Source Performance

Standards (‘‘NSPS’’), 40 C.F.R. Part 60,

Subparts A and Db, at its potato

processing plants in American Falls,

and Twin Falls, Idaho (collectively ‘‘the

Plants’’). The Plants are affected

facilities as defined in the NSPS, which

require: notification of construction,

anticipated startup, and actual startup of

affected facilities; performance testing of

affected facilities; monitoring of

emissions from affected facilities; and

maintenance of records of such

monitoring. Lamb-Weston failed to

timely comply with these requirements

at the Plants, as required by Sections

111 and 113 of the Clean Air Act

(‘‘CAA’’), 42 U.S.C. 7411 and 7413.

Under the proposed Decree, LambWeston shall pay the United States a

civil penalty of $160,000. Lamb-Weston

will also complete two supplemental

environmental projects (‘‘SEPs’’), at a

cost of approximately $364,000. LambWeston’s first SEP is replacement of a

burner at its American Falls plant with

a Low-NOX Burner that will reduce NOX

emissions at that plant by at least 40

percent. Lamb-Weston’s second SEP is

the design, construction and operation

of a wastewater recycling system at its

Twin Falls plant. Currently, LambWeston uses a silt water system to

transport whole potatoes from the Twin