alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37319-37320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    A meeting of the Materials Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) will 
be held July 23, 1998, 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 
Room 1617M(2), 14th Street between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical 
questions that

[[Page 37320]]

affect the level of export controls applicable to advanced materials 
and related technology.
    Agenda:
    1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
    2. Explanation on purpose of electing Co-Chair.
    3. Election of Co-Chair.
    4. Presentation on status of Chemical Weapons Convention.
    5. Presentation on status of Biological Weapons Convention 
implementation protocol.
    6. Presentation on technical issues for chemical and equipment 
related to Australia Group list review.
    7. Presentation on technical issues for biologicals and biological 
equipment related to Australia Group list review.
    8. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. To the extent that time permits, members of 
the public may present oral statements to the Committee.
    Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the 
meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation 
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that 
presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks prior to 
the meeting to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter, OAS/EA/BXA 
MS:3886C, 15th St. & Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230.
    For further information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee Ann 
Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-18152 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-M
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 9, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00395-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 25th District Court

Colorado County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 24399

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed May 3, 2021. The notice 

of appeal was filed July 14, 2021. To date, our records show that appellant has not

paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in 

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying 

costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).

On August 16, 2021, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing 

fee on or before August 26, 2021, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has 

not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

1

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.

1 We note that the letter of assignment and the notice of appeal state the date of judgment 

was May 3, 2021. Attached to the letter of assignment is a motion for new trial that was timely 

filed. However, a motion for new trial will not operate to extend the appellate timetable in an 

accelerated appeal. In the Interest of K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005). The notice of 

appeal was due May 24, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The fifteen-day grace period 

provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time ended June 8, 2021. See Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26); Tex. R.

App. P. 26.3. Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed until July 14, 2021.
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 23
                                                          ----------

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
          -----------------------------------------

TO FALCON PRODUCTS, INC.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements File Nos. 2-98469,
33-15698, 33-46997, 33-46998, 33-58159, 333-18671, 333-60735, and
333-83207.

                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

St. Louis, Missouri,
January 26, 2000
No. 10-11196.

#### Albert R. Holland, Jr., Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 378,

181 L. Ed. 2d 239,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6399.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
1LJI'L.IIJLL,.,. ... iI"~""'n.· ... iI" of Environmental Protection 

Secretary 

Mr. Donald S. Welsh 

Regional Administrator 

Rachel Carson State Of1ice Building 

P.O. Box 2063 ~ 

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

August 29, 2007 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Welsh: 

717-787-2814 

In accordance with Section 172 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S. C. § 7502, I am pleased to 

submit the Attainment Demonstration for the Pennsylvania portion of the moderate eight-hour 

ozone Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Nonattainment Area for approval as a revision to 

Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SIP revision, which is based, in part, on 

photochemical grid modeling, air quality trends, and emission trends, demonstrates how the 

Commonwealth will attain the health-based eight-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) by June 15, 2010. The public participation process for this SIP revision 

included a public hearing in Norristown on June 22,2007, and a 30-day written comment period, 

which closed on June 26, 2007. 

I have enclosed two hard copies and one compact disk of the SIP revision for the 

southeastern Pennsylvania (Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties) 

eight-hour ozone nonattainment area. The complete submittal includes the following: 

(1) attainment demonstration (including the mobile emissions budget for purposes of 

transportation conformity); (2) certification of public participation activities; (3) technical 

support document (including the 2002 base year inventory; and (4) the CommentlResponse 

Document. In addition, the SIP submittal includes the 2008 and 2009 reasonable further 

progress milestones, the base year 2002 emissions inventory, a reasonably available control 

measure analysis, a description of contingency measures that will be implemented to bring the 

area back into attainment should violations of the NAAQS occur after the standard is attained, 

and mobile source emission budgets for purposes of transportation conformity. 

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Joyce E. Epps, 

Director, Bureau of Air Quality, bye-mail at jeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at 

717 -787 -9702. 

Enclosures 

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us ru 

Printed on Recycled Paper \6¢1
No. 10-11173.

#### Howard Steven Ault, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 871, 132 S. Ct. 224,

181 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6855.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 53 So. 3d 175.
No. 11-5546.

#### Knowell Greenwood, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 913, 132 S. Ct. 327,

181 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6051.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 78 Mass. App. 611, 941 N.E.2d 667.
July 1, 2021 DLA-SM-21-3195

DLA - Strategic Materials Announces 

Beryllium Hot Pressed Powder Awards 

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – The Defense Logistics Agency - Strategic Materials 

announced today that 9,000 LBS of Beryllium Hot Pressed 

Powder has been awarded under 

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 (Negotiated) Amendment No. 

001 (FY 2021 Beryllium). The sole award has a value of 

approximately $2.47 M*.

*If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld

For additional information please visit our website 

www.dla.mil/strategic-materials or contact DLA Strategic Materials 

Directorate of Strategic Planning and Market Research at 

DLAStrategicMaterials@dla.mil.
No. 11-114.

#### Cynthia R. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

565 U.S. 883, 132 S. Ct. 252,

181 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5315.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*146Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 925.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, A. Dwight Utz, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                   |  |  |  |                                       |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ A. Dwight Utz                     |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | A. Dwight Utz                         |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 



40
Exhibit 21

                               SUBSIDIARIES OF FGI


FARMERS GROUP, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS FARMERS
UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION


         Truck Underwriters Association, a California corporation

         Fire Underwriters Association, a California corporation

         F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation  (1)

         Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, a Washington corporation
 
         FIG Leasing Co., Inc., a California corporation  (2)

         Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation  (3)

         Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada corporation  (4)

         Farmers Group Capital, a Delaware statutory business trust

         Farmers Group Capital II, a Delaware statutory business trust

         Farmers Investment Research & Management, a Nevada corporation

         Farmers Underwriters Association, a California corporation (inactive)

         F.I.G. Travel, a California corporation (inactive)

         Farmers Services Corporation, a Nevada corporation

         Farmers Financial Services Corporation, a Nevada corporation

         Farmers Reinsurance Company, a California corporation	

---------------------------------------
(1)    Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association own
       30% and 70%, respectively, of the equity of F.I.G. Holding Company.

(2)    FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association 
       own 95.2%, 3.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the equity of FIG Leasing
       Co., Inc..

(3)    FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association 
       own 38%, 53% and 9%, respectively, of the equity of Prematic 
       Service Corporation, a California corporation.

(4)    Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation, owns 100% 
       of the equity of Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
**Exhibit32**

** **

 

**Certificationof**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**and Chief Financial Officer**

**SecuritiesExchange Act rules13(a) and 15(d)**

**As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

** **

** **

In connectionwiththeAnnualReportonForm10-KAofMetwood,Inc.("theCompany")fortheyear endedJune30,2014,asfiledwiththeSecuritiesandExchangeCommissiononthedatehereof("the Report"), eachof theundersignedChiefExecutiveOfficerandChiefFinancialOfficerofthe Companycertifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1) The Reportfullycomplieswith the requirementsof Section 13(a) or15(d) of

the SecuritiesExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents,in all materialrespects,

the financialcondition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

Date: May 4, 2015 

**/s/*RobertM. Callahan***

RobertM. Callahan

ChiefExecutive Officer

 

 

Date: May 4, 2015 

**/s/*ShawnA. Callahan***

ShawnA. Callahan

ChiefFinancial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6036

KEENAN BARRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00723-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: August 26, 2020 Decided: September 10, 2020

Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keenan Barry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keenan Barry appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to pay an

initial partial filing fee or to aver that he could not pay such a fee.

*

 On appeal, we confine 

our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barry’s 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, 

our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Because the district court dismissed Barry’s action “for procedural reasons 

unrelated to the contents of the pleadings,” we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Goode 

v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015); see Bing v. Brivo 

Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 611-12 (4th Cir. 2020) (discussing factors courts consider in 

determining whether order is final and appealable).
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, John P. Mitola, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electric CityCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of theRegistrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theRegistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. /s/ John P. MitolaJohn P. MitolaChief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. STN 50-454 AND STN 50-456]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Notice of Withdrawal of Application 
for Amendment to Facility Operating Licenses

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Commonwealth Edison Company (the licensee) to withdraw 
its January 31, 1997, application for proposed amendments to Facility 
Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66, for Byron Station, Units 1 
and 2, located in Ogle County, Illinois.
    The proposed amendment would have modified the facility technical 
specifications (TS) to reduce the Byron, Unit 1, limiting TS value for 
the primary coolant dose equivalent iodine-131 (DEI) concentration from 
0.35 to 0.20 microcuries per gram. The intent of this proposed TS 
revision was to limit the offsite dose at the exclusion area boundary 
to a small fraction of the radiation exposure guidelines in 10 CFR Part 
100. In the interim, ComEd performed an operability assessment and 
administratively reduced the Byron, Unit 1, DEI to 0.20 microcuries per 
gram. On November 7, 1997, ComEd started its Byron, Unit 1, fall 1997 
refueling outage during which the steam generators (SG) are being 
replaced. The replacement SG begin installed at Byron, Unit 1, will not 
have the relatively large end of cycle SG tube leakage attributed to 
the original SG. Accordingly, the license amendment requests submitted 
on January 31, 1997, was no longer needed.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on March 12, 
1997, (62 FR 11489). However, by letter dated November 11, 1997, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated January 31, 1997, and the licensee's 
letter dated November 11, 1997, which withdrew the application for the 
license amendments. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Byron Public Library District, 109 N. 
Franklin, P.O. Box 434, Byron, Illinois 60481.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of January, 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
M. David Lynch,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate III-2, Division of Reactor 
Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
[FR Doc. 98-1900 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 10-10709.

#### Edward Washington, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 162,

181 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6425,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRANS TIME EXPRESS 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1260 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

In view of the impending prospective lapse in FY20 14 appropriations funding 

govermnent operations as of September 30, 2013, the Department has directed that all employees 

in the Office of Hearings be furloughed in the event of such a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of 

such a lapse, the Office of Hearings will close on Tuesday, October l, 2013, for the duration of 

the shutdown. 

Any deadline, whether set by regulation or previous order, is suspended and extended for 

the duration of the shutdown. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yoder / 

Chief Administrative Law Judg 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbm Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Cameron Niakan, Respondent's Counsel 

10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 

Rockville, MD 20852 

TEL: 202-276-4726 

FAX: (None Provided) 

EMAIL: cn@Niakanlaw.com 

Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel 

Sabrina Jawed, Complainant ·.s· Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel, FAA 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EII-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1260 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket' Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-