alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant 
Impact for the Fielding of the ``Generator, Mechanical Smoke: For Dual 
Purpose Unit, M56'' and the ``Generator Smoke Mechanical: Mechanized 
Smoke Obscurant System M58''

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of the 
final Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) and Finding of No 
Significant Impact (FNSI) for the Fielding of the ``Generator, 
Mechanical Smoke: For Dual Purpose Unit, M56'' and the ``Generator 
Smoke Mechanical: Mechanized Smoke Obscurant System M58.'' The Army 
published a notice of availability in the Federal Register of the 
drafts for both the PEA and FNSI on April 27, 1998 (63 FR 20615), which 
initiated a 30-day period for public review and comment. The public 
review and comment period ended on May 27, 1998.
    The Army's proposed action is to field the M56 and M58 to Army 
installations across the Nation for use in visual and infrared 
training. The PEA discloses the general types of impacts and effects on 
all relevant aspects of the human environment (e.g., flora, fauna, air, 
soil, water and human health) that will likely result from use of the 
graphite module in training. See PEA, pages 55-65. Receiving 
installations will be required to prepare site-specific analyses in 
which they consider the intensity of impacts associated with the 
emission of graphite particles into the local environment, and, if 
appropriate, develop mitigation measures.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the final PEA and FNSI may be obtained by writing 
to Commander, U.S. Army Environmental Center, ATTN:SFIM-AEC-
 (Mr. Hankus), Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5401 or by 
calling (410) 671-2556.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No public comments were received following 
the 30-day comment period on the draft PEA and finding. As a result, 
the Army has finalized the FNSI and will proceed with implementation of 
the proposed action without further review and comment. Preparation of 
an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Raymond J. Fatz,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and 
Occupational Health) (OASA (I, L&E)).
[FR Doc. 98-18449 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-01-M
No. 10-10326.

#### Jeffery Miller, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 833, 132 S. Ct. 135,

181 L. Ed. 2d 55,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5816.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 

**- 2143** 

CHARLES GREEN ,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

DEPUTY SHERIFF TOM HODGES ,

Defendant

– Appellee
,

and

RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LEON LOTT ,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv

- 03162

- JFA )

Submitted : June 26, 2014 Decided: July 2, 2014

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Charles Green , Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann
, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit

.2 PER CURIAM:

Charles Green appeals a jury verdict denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the

record , including the transcript of the two

- day jury trial, and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Green v.

Deputy Tom Hodges , No. 3:10

- cv

- 03162

- JFA (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27,

2013 ; entered Aug. 28, 2013). We deny Green’s motions for

appointment of counsel and to c ompel disclosure of evidence. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

 Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results  of operations. 

 October 30, 2003 

/s/ Michael Harrop   Michael Harrop, Chief Financial Officer 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-33349, No. 033-65184 and No. 033-29219) and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 033-45468) of Fab Industries, Inc. and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 16, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Fab Industries, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 2, 2000.



                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina

February 26, 2001
DLA FORM 1880, APR 2007 PDF (DLA)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Privacy Act Cover Sheet

The attached document(s) contains Privacy Act protected data or personally

identifiable information. It should be treated as "For Official Use Only."

Purposeful disclosures of this information can result in civil, criminal, or

administrative penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that

you have received this document(s) in error, do not copy, disseminate or

otherwise use the information. Contact your local Privacy Act or Security

Officer immediately.

DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED ARE

TO BE HANDLED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE PRIVACY ACT

Contents shall not be disclosed, discussed, or shared with

individuals unless they have a direct need-to-know in the

performance of their official duties. The document(s) are to

be handled in accordance with FOUO procedures.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3297 

To amend the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control 

Act of 1998 to clarify that during a lapse in appropriations certain 

services relating to the Harmful Algal Bloom Operational Forecasting 

System are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2019 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. TLAIB, 

Mr. GAETZ, and Mrs. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research 

and Control Act of 1998 to clarify that during a lapse 

in appropriations certain services relating to the Harmful 

Algal Bloom Operational Forecasting System are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3297 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harmful Algal Bloom 

3 Essential Forecasting Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATING CERTAIN HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM 

5 SERVICES AS EXCEPTED SERVICES UNDER 

6 THE ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 603A of the Harmful 

8 Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 

9 1998 is amended by adding at the end the following sub10 section: 

11 ‘‘(j) ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT APPLIED TO HARMFUL

12 ALGAL BLOOM SERVICES.—Any services by an officer or 

13 employee under this chapter relating to web services and 

14 server processing for the Harmful Algal Bloom Oper15 ational Forecast System of the National Centers for 

16 Coastal Ocean Science and the National Oceanic and At17 mospheric Administration shall be deemed, for purposes 

18 of section 1342 of title 31, United States Code, services 

19 for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the 

20 protection of property.’’. 

21 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub22 section (a) shall apply to any lapse in appropriations be23 ginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
102

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Mississippi

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $36.5 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 5,400

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 68,500

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $1,237 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $151.6 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $113.0 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $264.6 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 14%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$10.0 $12.5 $3.35 $4.19

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$2.9 $4.1 $0.97 $1.37

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $9.5 $15.1 $3.18 $5.06

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$2.2 $3.2 $0.75 $1.06

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$1.1 $1.6 $0.38 $0.53

TOTAL $25.7 $36.5 $8.63 $12.21

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

1

DIC FQ1/FQ2/GQ1/GQ2 FORMAT

BILLING FOR TRANSPORTATION

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DI Code 1-3 Enter 

FQ1 or GQ1 (charge)

FQ2 or GQ2 (credit).

RI Code 4-6 Enter the RI code of the billing office.

Description 7-29 Enter descriptive phrase for the type of service, 

e.g., Premium Transportation.

Document Number 30-43 Enter the document number for which the 

charge or credit applies.

Suffix 44 Enter the document number suffix, if any, for 

which the charge or credit applies.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Enter the supplementary address.

Signal Code 51 Enter the signal code.

Fund Code 52-53 For GSA level A and B pack surcharge follow 

the guidance provided in chapter 2. Otherwise, 

perpetuate from the order or requisition.

Bill Number 54-58 Enter bill number from the SBR.

Blank 59 Leave blank.

Type Bill Code 60-61 For reimbursements related to a lateral 

redistribution or procurement offset enter type 

of bill code LR or DR respectively; otherwise, 

may be left blank1.

Blank 62-64 Leave blank.

Amount 65-73 Enter the amount of the charge or credit.

65-71: Dollars

72-73: Cents

Blank 74-80 Leave blank.

1 Although type bill codes are normally not required, billing offices are encouraged to use them.
No. 11-6092.

#### Robert McClain, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 928, 132 S. Ct. 365,

181 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6958.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 63.
No. 11-5606.

#### Nikiforos Kalfountzos, Petitioner v. United States Railroad Retirement Board.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 499,

181 L. Ed. 2d 353,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7759,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 612.
----

----

| 1. | the                  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.,                  for the                  period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Falcon                  Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                     |                                      |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                        |                                     |
|                                   |                                |                                 |
| Dated August                  14, 2006 |                                     | /s/ Fred                  M. Montano |
|                                        | Fred                  M. Montano,        |
|                                        | Chief                  Executive Officer |

----

----
No. 10-10850.

#### Raymond J. Fierro, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 180,

181 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6229.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Florida 

6225 Ulmerton Road 

· Clearwater, Florida 33760 

800.659.2080 

National Aviation Academy 

New England 

150 Hanscom Drive 

Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 

800.292.3228 

October 23, 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20591 

Subject: Extension of exemption from Code of Federal Regulations 14 CFR, Part 

65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic General (AMG) written tests to be 

administered after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum. 

Exemption Number: 10211 Docket Number: FAA-2010-1256 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

National Aviation Academy-New England (NAA-NE) operates an FAA Approved 

.-... 

c::::> 

....... 

<:::) 

L) 

--t 

w 

u 

~ 

.r= 

.r:: 

,· Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) in Bedford, Massachusetts under Air 

Agency Certificate EC6T068K 

PETITION: 

NAA-NE is requesting an extension of Exemption Number: 10211 relating to 14 CFR, 

Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) to be 

administered after AMTS students successfully complete the corresponding portion of the 

curriculum. · 

RELIEF SOUGHT: 

NAA-NE is seeking an extension of the exemption from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow 

students enrolled in its FAA Approved 14 CFR Part 14 7 Aviation Maintenance 

Technician School (AMTS) to take the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, 

AMP) after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to meeting the 

experience requirements of §65.77. 

PERSON(S) TO BE COVERED BY THE EXEMPTION: 

NAA-NE, Air Agency Certificate Number EC6T068K and students enrolled in its AMTS 

program in the Airframe, Powerplant and Airframe and Powerplant cirrricula. 

www.naa.edu 

\..--:' 

C..J-ICJ 

C)?=J,-n 

~-E--:-o -lc555; 

o-u--; 

-oOs: 

rn::orn 

::o~z ::1>--;-i -i-o oo.,., zZ. 

(f:J 
Exemption Extension Request Page 2 of2 

Information, views or arguments to support the action sought: 

There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and 

safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension of 

the exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be 

detrimental to NAA-NE and the students it serves. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

.4L. j//7---L--

Glenn S. Bender 

Director of Education 

National Aviation Academy-New England 

CC: William J. Fullam, PMI 

Flight Standards District Office 

One Cranberry Hill, Suite 402 

Lexington, Massachusetts 024 21-7394
No. 11-6381.

#### Elizabeth Webster, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 524,

181 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7879.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 976.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH S. ORD                                                                            
|             |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
LIST OF SUCCESSFUL BIDDER

DATE: 6/25/2015 PAGE: 001

IFB NUMBER: 39-4006

IFB ITEM SALE: KUWAIT (LEAD ACID BATTERIES, SCRAP)

SCO: WILLIE N. PAYNE

 

BID OPENING DATE: 12/18/2014

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIDDER NAME

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM

NO

U/I ITEM NAME UNIT BID

PRICE

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

BULLDOZER GULF GEN TRAD & CONT. CO.

0001 LB LEAD ACID BATTERIES, SCRAP WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.4870
NO. 07-02-0289-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	NOVEMBER 13, 2002

	______________________________

	LARRY KEITH MATHEWS,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 252ND CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;

	NO. 79802; HON. LEONARD J. GIBLIN, JR., PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.*

	Larry Keith Mathews (appellant) appeals from a judgment adjudicating him guilty of aggravated robbery.  We affirm. 

	Appellant pled guilty, without a recommendation for punishment, to the trial court. After the trial court admonished appellant concerning his plea of guilty, it then placed him on deferred adjudication for 10 years.  Subsequently, the State moved the court to adjudicate appellant guilty of aggravated robbery, which the court did, and upon completion of a pre-sentence investigation report sentenced appellant to ten years in prison.

	Appellant timely noticed his appeal, and counsel was appointed.  Appellant's counsel then moved to withdraw, after filing a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and representing that he had searched the record and found no arguable grounds for reversal.  The motion and brief illustrated that appellant was informed of his rights to review the appellate record and file his own brief.  So too did we inform appellant that any pro se response or brief he cared to file had to be filed by October 31, 2002.  To date, appellant has filed no pro se response or brief. 

	After conducting an independent review of the record, we find no reversible error. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Appellant represented to the court via the plea admonishment papers he signed that he was 1) properly indicted, 2) represented by legal counsel, and 3) mentally competent when he entered his plea.  Moreover, no appeal was taken within 30 days from the date of appellant’s guilty plea complaining of error occurring at that time.  Thus, we have no jurisdiction over any purported error arising from or prior to the plea hearing.  Manuel v. State, 944 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); see Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).  Finally, appellant pled true to the allegations contained in the motion to adjudicate guilt, and the punishment levied was within the range provided by statute.

	Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

						Brian Quinn

						    Justice

Do not publish.