alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
ENERGY
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6222

~ 30 September 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR ALL FEDERAL CIVILIAN AND NON-DOD CUSTOMERS

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Cost Plus Rate

This memorandum provides the official Cost Plus Rate for DLA Energy petroleum
products managed under the Defense Working Capital Fund for Fiscal Year 2019 as $0.05 per
gallon. The rate published is intended to remain in effect throughout the fiscal year.

Thank you in advance for your support to make our mission successful. Support to our
customers with the highest quality, priority service, and lowest price is our top priority and
utmost concern.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Kevin Robinson at (571) 767-0027.

RICHARD SNINSKY

Comptroller
DLA Finance Energy
40

34.5

28.2

ge30 27.4acentreP20

15.1

13.3

11.8

10

0

2000 2002 2004 

Year

50

FIGURE: Pecentage of middle school and high school s

currently use any tobacco product*, by year -- United Sta

* Use of cigarettes or cigars or smokeless tobacco or pipes or bidis or kreteks o† Significant difference (p<0.05) versus preceding data collection period.

2006 National Youth Tobacco Survey and Key Pre
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.2

                                   CERTIFICATE




         I, KENNETH J. WARREN, hereby certify that I am the duly elected
Secretary of PH Group Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), and do
further certify that the following resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on January 21,
1998, and that such resolution has not been amended or rescinded, and is in full
force and effect:

         RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required to execute
an annual report on Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB (whether on behalf of the Company
or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) or any amendment or
supplement thereto be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute a power
of attorney appointing Charles T. Sherman, his or her true and lawful attorney
and agent to execute in his or her name, place and stead (in any such capacity)
the annual report and all amendments or reports necessary or in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to
have full power and authority to do and to perform in the name and on behalf of
each of said officers and directors, or both, as the case may be, every act
which is necessary or advisable to be done as fully, and to all intents and
purposes, as any such officer or director might or could do in person; ...

         Dated this 30th day of March, 1998.


                                                  /s/ KENNETH J. WARREN
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Kenneth J. Warren



                                      -19-
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3224

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased access 
   to Department of Veterans Affairs medical care for women veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for increased access 
   to Department of Veterans Affairs medical care for women veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVED ACCESS TO DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
              CARE FOR WOMEN VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1720J. Medical services for women veterans
    ``(a) Access to Care.--The Secretary shall ensure that gender 
specific services are continuously available at every medical center 
and community based outpatient clinic of the Department.
    ``(b) Study on Extended Hours of Care.--The Secretary shall conduct 
a study to assess--
            ``(1) the use of extended hours as a means of reducing 
        barriers to care;
            ``(2) the need for extended hours based on interviews with 
        women veterans and employees; and
            ``(3) the best practices and resources required to 
        implement use of extended hours.
    ``(c) Annual Report to Congress.--Not later than September 30 of 
each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the 
House of Representatives a report on compliance with subsection (a).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1720I the following new item:

``1720J. Medical services for women veterans.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6035.

#### Anthony W. Glenmore, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 953, 132 S. Ct. 425,

181 L. Ed. 2d 276,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7270.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 12 A.3d 1172.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 10942-001 and 10416-003]


Skykomish River Hydro, Washington Hydro Develop. Corp.; Notice of 
Meetings

July 16, 1998.
    A meeting will be convened by staff of the Office of Hydropower 
Licensing on Tuesday, August 11, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. at the Lynwood 
City Hall, 19100 44th Avenue West, Lynwood, Washington. The purpose of 
this meeting is to learn the status of the applicant's response to the 
Commission's March 19, 1998, additional information request on the 
proposed Martin Creek Project (P-10942-001). In particular, the meeting 
will focus on the project's consistency with the President's Forest 
Plan.
    Following the first meeting, the Commission will attend a meeting 
at the same location on the proposed licensing of the Anderson Creek 
Project (P-10416-003). The meeting will involve the Forest Service and 
the applicant, Washington Hydro Development Corporation, who will 
discuss the possibility of redesigning the project to minimize 
environmental impacts.
    If you have any questions concerning these matters, please contact 
Mr. Carl Keller at (202) 219-2831 or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bddedccfd193d6d8d1d1d8cffddbd8cfde93dbd8d993c8ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85e6e4f7e9abeee0e9e9e0f7c5e3e0f7e6abe3e0e1abf0f6">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or Mr. Alan Mitchnick at (202) 219-2826 or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f899949996d695918c9b9096919b93b89e9d8a9bd69e9d9cd68d8b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a3b363b347437332e3932343339311a3c3f2839743c3f3e742f29">[email protected]</span></a>.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19452 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF REGISTRANT FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,406,000
<SECURITIES>                                21,677,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,541,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   232,000
<INVENTORY>                                    183,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,491,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,825,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,140,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,835,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,977,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,140,000
<SALES>                                     26,644,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,476,000
<CGS>                                       21,400,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,857,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                43,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,401,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,841,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,323,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,323,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

VitalWorks Inc.
Ridgefield, Connecticut

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statements of VitalWorks Inc., formerly known as InfoCure Corporation (the
"Company"), on Forms S-3, numbers 333-45480, 333-40704, 333-37890, 333-34490,
333-88589, 333-87795, 333-73097 and 333-71109 and Forms S-8, numbers 333-84468,
333-72890, 333-56556, 333-40730, 333-40488, 333-39792 and 333-74773 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, respectively, of our reports dated
January 23, 2002 (March 11, 2002 for Note H) on the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of the Company appearing in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York

March 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ORRIE COKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (9:00-cr-00997-SB-3)

Submitted: March 21, 2008 Decided: April 10, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orrie Coker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Orrie Coker seeks to appeal the district court’s order

treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, and denying it for want of jurisdiction. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000);

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong

and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is

likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Coker has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Coker’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Coker’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-6423.

#### Gary Kevin Adkins, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 470,

181 L. Ed. 2d 306,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7591.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 471.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         I, Roger S. Newton, Chief Executive Officer of Esperion Therapeutics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *


  /s/ Roger S. Newton
----------------------------
Roger S. Newton,
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    August 14, 2002
No. 10-10761.

#### Harold L. Fisher, Jr., Petitioner v. Carol J. Holinka, Warden.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 169,

181 L. Ed. 2d 81,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6008.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-10357.

#### Travis Grevious, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 834, 132 S. Ct. 137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 57,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5305.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CS243954D

2014
 

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 

Office on Smoking and Health 

Defines the specific annual investment needed for state comprehensive tobacco control programs 

to implement what we know works to reduce tobacco-related disease and death. 

Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Mass-reach health communication interventions can prevent initiation, promote 

cessation, and shape social norms about tobacco use. These interventions are effective 

in countering pro-tobacco advertising and promotion, especially among youth and 

young adults. 

State programs can boost efficiency by using existing resources, such as CDC’s Media 

Campaign Resource Center, to find effective, existing advertisements. New advertising 

should only be developed when a campaign objective is unique enough that existing 

ads may not address it or when it needs to publicize a local event. 

Mass-reach health communication interventions should include: 

•	 Graphic, emotional anti-tobacco ads 

•	 Ad buys with sufficient reach, frequency, and duration to encourage—and 

sustain—behavior change 

•	 Audience insight research and concept testing if developing new material 

•	 Surveillance to understand messaging, placement, and marketing 

•	 Local media support and community collaboration to increase awareness 

and reinforce social norms 

•	 Digital technologies for further dissemination, as appropriate 

•	 Promotion of cessation services to support tobacco user who want to quit 

•	 Process and outcome evaluation 

Considerations for Funding Levels for Mass-Reach Health 

Communication Interventions include: 

•	 Television ad buys 

•	 Cost of Gross Rating Points (a measure of audience reach and frequency) 

by state and audience 

Major Content Areas for Mass-reach Health Communication 

Messaging: 

•	 Motivate tobacco users to try to quit 

•	 Protect people from the harms of secondhand smoke 

•	 Transform social norms to prevent tobacco use initiation 

The 2014 Best Practices formula only considers television media placement in the 

mass-reach health communication intervention component. 

However, there are other costs, such as ad development, but these will vary 

significantly by state. Also, new media, such as social media approaches, have great 

potential, but more evidence is needed to understand costs and impact. 

The best available science 

indicates that traditional 

mass media is the best 

way to encourage— 

and sustain—behavior 

change. 

Evidence shows that: 

•	The longer and more 

intense the campaign, 

the greater the decline 

in smoking 

•	Graphic, hard-hitting 

ads work
No. 11-5650.

#### Thomas Rea, Petitioner v. Wal-Mart Store 1105.

565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 407,

181 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7313,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*267Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 700.
Wdesk | Exhibit 10.14 Form of Secondment Letter






EXHIBIT 10.14







June ___, 2014
[Name]
[Address]


Dear [Name]:


As outlined in the June ___, 2014 letter to you, your [Amended and Restated] Employment Agreement with Weatherford International Ltd., dated __________ ___, 201__ (the “Agreement”), was assigned to Weatherford Management Company Switzerland LLC (the “Company”) as the new contracting party under the Agreement (the “Assignment”).


Further to the Assignment, and as provided in Section 2 of your Agreement, you and the Company hereby agree that you will be seconded to the employment of Weatherford U.S., L.P. (the “Secondment”), effective as of the closing date of the merger between Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock company and Weatherford International plc, an Irish public limited company. We expect this date to be on or around June 17, 2014. Following the Secondment, your rights with respect to secondments will otherwise continue as set forth in Section 2 of your Agreement.


This letter, and your signature below, confirm your express consent and agreement to the Secondment.


Your assistance in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions in this regard, do not hesitate to contact me.


 (Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows) 









Please sign in the space provided below acknowledging your agreement and return a signed copy to me no later than June ___, 2014. 




	
			
	 
	 
	Weatherford Management Company Switzerland LLC, 
a Swiss limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	James C. Parent, Managing Officer








	
		
	Agreed and Acknowledged:

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Name:
	 

	Tile
	 

	Date:
	 






	
		
	WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Name:
	 

	Tile
	 

	Date:
No. 11-5404.

#### Rebecca Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 306,

181 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5791.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5008.

#### Theodore D. Lockley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 257,

181 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5750.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 1238.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
<NAME> ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      604,899
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,315
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          41,507
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        29,607
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 683,328
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      132,268
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             60,564
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 208,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,928
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              22,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       13,220
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 195,577
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  683,328
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      134,847
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,678
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      82,571
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      95,249
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         39,598
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 786
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  40,384
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        15,616
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,768
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        813
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   23,955
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,929
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,721
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          41,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All amounts in thousands except per share amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>