alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-080]


Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Robert J. Bobek, 
Code ICB National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, (202) 358-1223.

Reports

    Title: Patent Waiver Report.
    OMB Number: 2700-0050.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement.
    Need and Uses: Reports are analyzed by the NASA Inventions and 
Contributions Board to evaluate the progress made by NASA contractors 
who received waiver of patent rights in terms of development and 
commercialization of waived inventions.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 66.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 66.
    Estimated Hours Per Request: 2.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 147.
    Frequency of Report: Annually.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-16328 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
John Larson Phone: 541 - 753 -4466

Honey B, LLC Fax: 541 - 753 - 7110 5695 SW Airport Place email: john@corvallisaero.net Corvallis, Oregon 97333 November 7, 2012 Exemption No. 10250 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2011 - 0369 Frederick E. Tilt on, ND Federal Air Surgeon 800 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Dr. Tilton, Honey B, LLC hereby applies for an extension of exemption No. 10250 from 14 CFR Part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Honey B, LLC to cover its safety - sensitiv e employees under one drug testing program. The grant of extension will allow Honey B, LLC to continue to provide service to the public. It has been found that the exemption is in the public interest and allows us to maintain a level of safety equivalent to that provided by regulation. Sincerely, /s/ John Larson Honey B, LLC
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 LODGIAN, INC.By:
    /s/ Edward J. RohlingEDWARD J. ROHLINGChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ James A. MacLennanJAMES A. MACLENNANExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   54
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Westminster Capital, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
33-21177 on Form S-8 of Westminster Capital, Inc. of our report dated March
1, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Westminster Capital, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of
Westminster Capital, Inc.



                                             KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 27, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24


                             DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

    RE:  Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
         Commission File No. 1-6695
         1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K
         For Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005

Gentlemen:

The above Company is the issuer of securities registered under Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"). Each of the persons signing his or
her name below confirms, as of the date appearing opposite his or her signature,
that Alan Rosskamm, Brian P. Carney, and each of them, are authorized on his or
her behalf to sign and to submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission such
filings on Form 10-K as are required by the Act. Each person so signing also
confirms the authority of Alan Rosskamm, Brian P. Carney, and each of them, to
do and perform on his or her behalf, any and all acts and things requisite or
necessary to assure compliance by the signing person with the Form 10-K filing
requirements. The authority confirmed herein shall remain in effect as to each
person signing his or her name below until such time as the Commission shall
receive from such person a written communication terminating or modifying the
authority.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 DATE                                                   DATE
                                 ----                                                   ----
<S>                      <C>                    <C>                              <C>
   /s/ ALAN ROSSKAMM        April 14, 2005           /s/ PATRICIA MORRISON         April 14, 2005
-----------------------   ------------------    -------------------------------  ------------------
     ALAN ROSSKAMM                                     PATRICIA MORRISON


  /s/ BRIAN P. CARNEY       April 14, 2005             /s/ FRANK NEWMAN            April 14, 2005
-----------------------   ------------------    -------------------------------  ------------------
    BRIAN P. CARNEY                                      FRANK NEWMAN


    /s/ SCOTT COWEN         April 14, 2005              /s/ BERYL RAFF             April 14, 2005
-----------------------   ------------------    -------------------------------  ------------------
      SCOTT COWEN                                         BERYL RAFF


    /s/ IRA GUMBERG         April 14, 2005             /s/ GREGG SEARLE            April 14, 2005
-----------------------   ------------------    -------------------------------  ------------------
      IRA GUMBERG                                        GREGG SEARLE


                                                   /s/ TRACEY THOMAS TRAVIS        April 14, 2005
                                                -------------------------------  ------------------
                                                     TRACEY THOMAS TRAVIS
</TABLE>
NO LE DÉ PENA PEDIRLE 

A LA GENTE QUE NO FUME 

CERCA DE SUS HIJOS.

Aden, 7 años

Jessica, Su madre

Nueva York

4 de cada 10 niños en los EE. UU. están expuestos al humo

de segunda mano. A Aden, le provoca ataques de asma. 

Mantenga a los niños alejados del humo. Si conoce a alguien 

que está interesado en recibir ayuda gratuita para dejar 

de fumar, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                       ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                                 (In thousands)

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           2005      2004      2003      2002      2001
                                         -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income from continuing
   operations before income taxes        $67,670   $38,989   $40,605   $37,588   $72,835
Fixed charges (1)
   Interest expense                       18,159    17,336    11,991     7,117     7,658
   Amortization of debt issuance
      cost                                    56        56       703       167       178
   Interest included in rental expense     3,137     2,894     2,398     2,164     2,035
                                         -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
      Total                               21,352    20,286    15,092     9,448     9,871
Earnings (2)                             $89,022   $59,275   $55,697   $47,036   $82,706
Ratio of earnings available to cover
   fixed charges                             4.2       2.9       3.7       5.0       8.4
</TABLE>

(1)  Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt
     issuance cost plus that portion of lease rental expense representative of
     the interest factor.

(2)  Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes
     plus fixed charges.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3122 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 

Congress from engaging in lobbying contacts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former 

Members of Congress from engaging in lobbying contacts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LOBBYING CONTACTS BY 

4 FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 207(e) of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended as follows: 

7 (1) Paragraph (1) is amended to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3122 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any person who is a 

2 Senator or a Member of the House of Rep3 resentatives and who, after that person leaves 

4 office, knowingly makes any lobbying contact to 

5 a covered executive branch official, or to any 

6 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

7 Congress, shall be punished as provided in sec8 tion 216 of this title. 

9 ‘‘(B) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph, 

10 the terms ‘lobbying contact’ and ‘covered execu11 tive branch official’ have the meanings given 

12 those terms in section 3 of the Lobbying Disclo13 sure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602).’’. 

14 (2) Paragraph (2) is amended— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘(2) Any person’’ and in16 serting the following: 

17 ‘‘(2) OFFICERS AND CERTAIN STAFF.— 

18 ‘‘(A) OFFICERS AND STAFF OF THE SEN19 ATE.—Any person’’; and 

20 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) OFFICERS OF THE HOUSE OF REP22 RESENTATIVES.—(i) Any person who is an 

23 elected officer of the House of Representatives 

24 and who, within 1 year after that person leaves 

25 office, knowingly makes, with the intent to inVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:52 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3122.IH H3122

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3122 IH

1 fluence, any communication to or appearance 

2 before any of the persons described in clause 

3 (ii), on behalf of any other person (except the 

4 United States) in connection with any matter 

5 on which such elected officer seeks action by a 

6 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

7 Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

8 punished as provided in section 216 of this title. 

9 ‘‘(ii) The persons referred to in clause (i) 

10 with respect to appearances or communications 

11 by a former elected officer are any Member, of12 ficer, or employee of the House of Representa13 tives.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to individuals who leave office 

16 or employment to which such amendments apply on or 

17 after the date of adjournment of the second session of the 

18 One Hundred Sixteenth Congress sine die or December 

19 31, 2020, whichever date is earlier. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-5264.

#### Kris Alan Hahn, Petitioner v. Thomas E. Bauer, et al.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 289,

181 L. Ed. 2d 174,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5578.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 413.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10180

Summary Calendar

 

FELIPE AGUIRRE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:93-CR-69-A)

 

July 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WEINER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant’s lengthy delay in filing a notice of appeal

causes some uncertainty regarding appellate jurisdiction and

standard of review. In order to decide this case with dispatch, we

treat appellant’s appeal from the denial of his application under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 as though he were before this court as of right

and review the district court’s decision de novo. We find no

error. United States v. Bailey, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), involved

the proper definition of the term “use” when applied to a
2

defendant’s use of a firearm. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), upon which

the district court relied to impose a 2-level increase to

defendant’s sentence, turns on whether a dangerous weapon was

“possessed.” Comment 3 to this section provides that “[t]he

adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it

is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the

offense.” In this case, law enforcement officials found the

firearm at issue at appellant’s residence together with over

$10,000 in cash. Some of the drug transactions forming the basis

for the indictment took place at appellant’s residence. Under such

circumstances, we find it decidedly less than “clearly improbable”

that appellant possessed the firearm in connection with his drug

offense. The district court committed no error in applying section

2D1.1(b)(1).

As appellant has briefed no other issue to this court, we

AFFIRM the judgment of the court below. We DENY the motion for the

appointment of counsel.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37565-37566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18740]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular 
Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the August 13, 1998 regular 
meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) will not be 
held. The Board will hold a special meeting at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, 
August 11, 1998. An agenda for that meeting will be forthcoming.

[[Page 37566]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TTD (703) 884-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18740 Filed 7-9-98; 3:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2143

CHARLES GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPUTY SHERIFF TOM HODGES,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LEON LOTT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:10-cv-03162-JFA)

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 2, 2014

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Green, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & 

LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Green appeals a jury verdict denying relief on 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the 

record, including the transcript of the two-day jury trial, and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Green v. 

Deputy Tom Hodges, No. 3:10-cv-03162-JFA (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27, 

2013; entered Aug. 28, 2013). We deny Green’s motions for

appointment of counsel and to compel disclosure of evidence. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19472]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, August 6, 1998.

PLACE: Federal Trade Commission Building, Room 532, 6th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Portions Open to Public: (1) Oral Argument in 
Novartis Corporation, et al., Docket 9279.
    Portions Closed to the Public: (2) Executive Session to follow Oral 
Argument in Novartis Corporation, et al. Docket 9279.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Victoria Streitfeld, Office of 
Public Affairs: (202) 326-2180, Recorded Message: (202) 326-2711.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19472 Filed 7-17-98; 10:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
No. 11-6304.

#### Fidencio Morales-Ramirez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 440,

181 L. Ed. 2d 286,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7241.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 796.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3168 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3168

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain legal fees 
and investment fees to be taken into account as miscellaneous itemized 
                              deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2019

  Mr. Flores introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain legal fees 
and investment fees to be taken into account as miscellaneous itemized 
                              deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FEES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMIZED 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 67(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of any 
legal fees, or investment fees, paid or incurred by an individual for 
the production of income or in connection with the performance of 
services as an employee, which but for the preceding sentence would be 
taken into account as a miscellaneous itemized deduction under 
subsection (a) for any such taxable year, the preceding sentence shall 
not apply.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of Public Law 115-97.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Legal fees.--The term ``legal fees'' shall include any 
        fee or expense paid or incurred to establish the basis of a 
        settlement agreement.
            (2) Investment fees.--The term ``investment fees'' means 
        any fee or expense paid or incurred for the management of 
        investments.
                                 <all>
```
IC 02-03

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.33. APPENDIX 8.33**

**CUSTOMER ASSET REPORT(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)**

AP3.33-3

3

APPENDIX 3.33

AP8.33-1

APPENDIX 8.33
No. 11-6502.

#### Shawndale Mickens, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 990, 132 S. Ct. 527,

181 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7608.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 82 App. Div. 3d 430, 917 N.Y.S.2d 630.
No. 11-5894.

#### In re Anthony D. Washington, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 392,

181 L. Ed. 2d 247,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6571.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-5558.

#### Rodney Davis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 328,

181 L. Ed. 2d 204,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5944.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 445.
# C_2015389EN.01001001.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — proceedings brought by Marie Matoušková, acting as court commissioner

(Case C-404/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 1(1)(b) - Substantive scope - Inheritance settlement agreement between the surviving spouse and minor children represented by a guardian ad litem - Classification - Requirement for approval of such an agreement by the court - Measure relating to parental responsibility or measure relating to succession))

(2015/C 389/11)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Marie Matoušková, acting as court commissioner

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as meaning that the approval of an agreement for the sharing-out of an estate concluded by a guardian ad litem on behalf of minor children constitutes a measure relating to the exercise of parental responsibility, within the meaning of Article 1(1)(b) of that regulation and thus falls within the scope of the latter, and not a measure relating to succession, within the meaning of Article 1(3)(f) thereof, excluded from the scope thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.

1

---