alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-09-0109-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JUNE 5, 2009

	______________________________

	DOUGLAS RUBINS, APPELLANT

	V.

	TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, TOM PAUKEN,

	AND L.A. FULLER & SONS CONST., CO., APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 96,974-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Douglas Rubins, proceeding pro se, filed this appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing, with prejudice, his case against Appellees, Texas Workforce Commission, Tom Pauken, and L.A. Fuller & Sons Const., Co.  By letter from this Court dated April 14, 2009, Rubins was notified that among other items, a filing fee of $175 was due within ten days.  In response, Rubins filed a motion for extension of time in which to pay the filing fee or, in lieu thereof, file an affidavit of indigence.  The motion was granted to May 25, 2009,1 with a detailed explanation of the procedures and deadlines for either filing an affidavit of indigence or paying the filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 20.1(c)(1) & (3).  Rubins was also admonished that failure to either pay the required filing fee of $175 or file a compliant affidavit of indigence accompanied by a motion for extension of time might result in dismissal of this appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Rubins did not respond to this Court’s notice.  Neither did he pay the required filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence.

	In response to a motion for extension of time in which to file the clerk’s record for nonpayment, this Court abated the request pending Rubins’s compliance with the Court’s directive.  Rubins’s failure to comply with the Court’s directive renders the clerk’s request for an extension of time moot.

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with an order of this Court.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.
3500 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3500

LOGISTICS AND
MATERIEL READINESS

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Agency Energy 2017 Worldwide Energy Conference

I’m proud to endorse the 2017 Worldwide Energy Conference, sponsored by Defense
Logistics Agency Energy. This world-class event will be held at the Gaylord National Hotel and
Convention Center at the Washington National Harbor, Maryland, from the 10" through the 12"
of April 2017. This year’s theme, "Refining Global Energy Strategies," underscores the
conference’s goal to provide a forum for DoD leaders to connect and team Service and DoD
customers and managers to product suppliers and distributers. This conference will also offer
players across the energy supply network to gain insight into and cross-talk ongoing and future
initiatives including alternative fuels and renewable energy.

Private sector participation at the Worldwide Energy Conference represents the entire energy
supply network from petroleum refiners and brokers to alternative fuel service providers, and
includes suppliers of natural gas, missile propellants, utility services and renewable energy. Both
domestic and international partners will be present. In addition, a range of training opportunities
are expected, with more than one hundred breakout sessions offered during this three-day event.
Attendees will have an incredible opportunity to hear top industry and military experts discuss the
challenges we face, and how, working together, we can forge ahead into the expanding energy
future.

I fully support the 2017 Worldwide Energy Conference as the premier DoD-sponsored energy
event this year, and request your maximum support and participation. Please encourage
widespread attendance throughout your organization.

Blt lV
Kristin K. French

Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense
Logistics and Materiel Readiness

Attachment:
None

Distribution:

ASSISTANT SECRETARY (ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENT)

DIRECTOR FOR LOGISTICS, JOINT STAFF

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, G-4, LOGISTICS, HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE
ARMY


DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, LOGISTICS, ENGINEERING AND FORCE PROTECTION,
HEADQUARTERS, U.S. AIR FORCE

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS, FLEET READINESS AND LOGISTICS

DEPUTY COMMANDANT, INSTALLATIONS AND LOGISTICS, HEADQUARTERS, U.S.
MARINE CORPS

U.S. TRANSPORTATION COMMAND, TCJ4/J5, DIRECTOR, STRATEGY, CAPABILITIES,
POLICY, AND LOGISTICS

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS, AND

EVIRONMENT)

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (INSTALLATIONS, ENERGY AND

ENVIRONMENT)

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (ENERGY, INSTALLATIONS AND

ENVIRONMENT)

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (INSTALLATIONS, ENVIRONMENT AND

ENERGY)

DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES

DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)
[J-68-2015] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT 

 LEHIGH VALLEY DUAL LANGUAGE CHARTER SCHOOL,     Appellee     v.   BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,     Appellant 

No. 43 MAP 2015  Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 2010 CD 2013 dated July 22, 2014, reconsideration denied September 10, 2014, Reversing and Remanding the order from the State Charter School Appeal Board at No. 2013-07 dated October 23, 2013. 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM      FILED:  September 28, 2015 

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2015, the Application to Dismiss is 

GRANTED.
No. 11-5729.

#### Justin L. Marino, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 344,

181 L. Ed. 2d 216,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6825.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-1243.

#### Thomas Cunningham, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 937, 132 S. Ct. 396,

181 L. Ed. 2d 250,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6543.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 563 U.S. 990, 131 S. Ct. 2471, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1213, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3796.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORP. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE QUARTER ENDING JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          58,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,781,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,693,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,748,250
<PP&E>                                      97,245,313
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,649,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,554,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,482,805
<BONDS>                                    100,989,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,806,200
<COMMON>                                           769
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,259,598)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,554,600
<SALES>                                      2,349,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,139,007
<CGS>                                        1,576,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,201,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,793,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,620)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,620)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

1

DIC FP1/FP2/GP1/GP2 (A) FORMAT

BILLING FOR INTO-PLANE ISSUES

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DI Code 1-3 Enter 

FP1 or GP1 (charge)

FP2 or GP2 (credit).

RI Code 4-6 Enter the RI code of the billing office.

Type Issue Code 7 Perpetuate from the DD Form 1898, 

Energy Sales Slip (hereafter referred to 

as the into-plane sales slip).

Stock Number 8-20 Enter the NSN.

Type of Bill Code 21-22 Enter a type of bill code or leave blank.

Quantity 23-29 Enter the billed or credit quantity.

Document Number 30-43 Constructed by the billing office as follows:

30-35 Perpetuate the DoDAAC of 

the requisitioner from the into-plane sales 

slip.

36-39 Year of decade and day of 

year of issue.

40-43 For issues to Navy and 

Marine Corps aircraft, billing offices will 

enter the last 4 digits of the preprinted 

serial number of the into-plane sales slip. 

For issues to Army and Air Force aircraft, 

billing offices will enter the last four digits 

of the aircraft tail number.

Major Force Program 44 Perpetuate from the into-plane sales slip.

Supplementary Address 45-50 Perpetuate the supplementary Address 

from the into-plane sales slip.

Signal Code 51 Perpetuate from the into-plane sales slip.

Fund Code 52-53 Perpetuate the fund code from the intoplane sales slip.

Bill Number 54-58 Enter the bill number from the SBR.

Customer ID 59-61 Perpetuate from the into-plane sales slip.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

2

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

Special Data 62-64 Enter last three position of the billing office 

DoDAAC when required by departmental 

procedures. Otherwise, leave blank.

Amount 65-73 Enter the amount billed or credit allowed.

Aircraft Mission/Design 

Series

74-76 Perpetuate the data from the into-plane 

sales slip.

Unit Price 77-80 Enter the standard unit price:

77 Dollars

78-80 Mills
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-10370

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cv-80517-WJZ-1

ROSWITHA ANN SAVOIE, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

RIC BRADSHAW, SHERIFF,

JEROME GOLDEN CENTER, et al, 

 Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(September 17, 2015)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-10370 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Roswitha Savoie appeals the dismissal of her suit on her own behalf against 

various defendants in the Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office and the Jerome Golden 

Center for violations of her constitutional rights.1

The district court dismissed Savoie’s case after she sought to proceed in 

forma pauperis on behalf of her minor son. The magistrate judge, having 

previously granted Savoie’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on her own 

behalf, had recommended that her motion on behalf of her son be denied. 

However, the district court, stating that it was approving, adopting, and ratifying 

the Report and Recommendation, denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis 

on behalf of her son and also dismissed the entire case. The court did not explain 

its decision; and the Report and Recommendation had not addressed the merits of 

Savoie’s claims on her own behalf. In fact, as mentioned earlier, the magistrate 

judge had granted Savoie’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on her own 

behalf.

A district court is free to “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part” the 

magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In 

other words, the court is not bound to the decision of the magistrate judge. But 

when a district court fails to sufficiently explain its rulings, we will remand the 

 1 Savoie had also filed related claims on behalf of her minor son, Savoie-Elston. Her 

appeal of the district court’s order dismissing the claims on behalf of her son was dismissed by 

order of this Court dated August 5, 2014.

Case: 14-10370 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

case. Danley v. Allen, 480 F.3d 1090, 1091–92 (11th Cir. 2007). Here, there is no 

explanation of the dismissal, which deprives this court of the ability to review. 

And, because the magistrate judge had previously granted in forma pauperis status 

to Savoie on her own, deeming the amendments she made to her complaint 

satisfactory, the decision to dismiss needs explanation. Therefore, we vacate the 

district court’s decision dismissing this case and remand to the district court for 

further proceedings.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Case: 14-10370 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 3 of 3
IB 

Union Calendar No. 349 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3094 

[Report No. 116–435] 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 South Orange 

Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. SOTO (for himself, Mrs. DEMINGS, and Mrs. MURPHY of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Additional sponsors: Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. CASTOR of 

Florida, Mr. CRIST, Ms. FRANKEL, Ms. SHALALA, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. HASTINGS, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CISNEROS, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. 

GALLEGO, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. COOPER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. STANTON, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Ms. 

HAALAND, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. HORSFORD, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. 

ROUDA, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. HOULAHAN, Ms. CRAIG, Ms. DEAN, Mr. 

SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. HIGGINS of 

New York, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Ms. MENG

JUNE 24, 2020 

Reported with an amendment; committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 4, 2019] 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3094 RH

A BILL 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 

South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for 

other purposes. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3094 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL PULSE MEMORIAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Pulse Memorial located at 

5 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, is 

6 designated as the ‘‘National Pulse Memorial’’. 

7 (b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memo8 rial designated by this section is not a unit of the National 

9 Park System and the designation of the National Pulse Me10 morial shall not require or permit Federal funds to be ex11 pended for any purpose related to that national memorial. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 349 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3094 

[Report No. 116–435] 

A BILL 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located 

32806, and for other purposes. at 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Reported with an amendment; committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-11188.

#### Marvin Mosley, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 226,

181 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6723,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                      
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 7, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JACK D. MASSIMINO                                                             
|                 |  |  |  | Jack D. Massimino President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**'**1350**

 

Solely for thepurposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general partner of **Regency Centers, L.P.** (the “Company”), herebycertify, based on my knowledge*,* that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 5, 2004 

 

/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.

Martin E.Stein, Jr.****

Chief Executive Officer
81

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Arkansas

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $36.7 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 5,800

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 68,700

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $1,215 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $245.4 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $50.5 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $295.9 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 12%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$10.1 $12.7 $3.42 $4.31

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$2.5 $3.5 $0.85 $1.19

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $9.9 $15.7 $3.36 $5.32

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$2.3 $3.2 $0.76 $1.08

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$1.1 $1.6 $0.38 $0.54

TOTAL $25.9 $36.7 $8.77 $12.44

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
No. 11-5220.

#### Keith Frazier, Petitioner v. Tom Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 895, 132 S. Ct. 283,

181 L. Ed. 2d 169,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5656.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 768.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1224-DR]


Massachusetts; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Massachusetts, (FEMA-1224-DR), dated June 23, 1998, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 2, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Massachusetts is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 23, 1998:

    Plymouth and Worcester Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Laurence W. Zensinger,
Division Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-18717 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P