alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50238 Summary Calendar

GLEN C. JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ALLAN B. POLUNSKY, Chairman; LEPHER JENKINS, TDC Regional Director; DAYTON J. POPPELL; MARSHALL D. HERKLOTZ; JANIE THOMAS; GARY LANG, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CV-210

- - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Glen C. James, #660410, appeals the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint asserting claims of due process violations in placing him in lockdown and inadequate food and exercise in lockdown in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court deniedJames leave to file the complaint in light of a sanction order in

James v. Collins , No. SA-95-CA-1024 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 1996), in which the district court ordered the clerk of court to refrain from filing any document submitted by James to the court until James paid a $50 monetary sanction or obtained written permission from the court. James does not dispute that he failed to pay the $50 monetary sanction. The district court, in denying James' motion for leave to file the complaint, indicated its willingness to accept for filing a narrowly-tailored complaint asserting James' claims of constitutionally inadequate food. James' claims concern events which occurred on or after January 23, 1996, and, thus, are not presently barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.003(a) (West 1996); Burrell
v. Newsome , 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir. 1989). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying James' motion for leave to file his civil rights complaint.
AFFIRMED.
No. 11-5071.

#### Todd Allen Spencer, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 265,

181 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5602.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 231.
Dear Mr. Baze:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3582). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/26/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
No. 10-7194.

#### Jeremy Pinson, Petitioner v. Robert Pacheco, et al.

562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 834,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9829.

178 L. Ed. 2d 567,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 488.
No. 11-5285.

#### Young Son Im, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 899, 132 S. Ct. 292,

181 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5753.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 399 Fed. Appx. 669.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 LODGIAN, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Edward J. RohlingEDWARD J. ROHLINGChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ James A. MacLennanJAMES A. MACLENNANExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   51
No. 11-5831.

#### David Maxwell, Petitioner v. James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 388,

181 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6365.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-86.

#### Anthony L. Ciocchetti, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 380,

181 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6590.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 695.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    3,755
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            30,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (2,865)
<INVENTORY>                                              35,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         75,302
<PP&E>                                                  223,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (60,170)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          293,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   (69,860)
<BONDS>                                                (190,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                              (29,633)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           (293,026)
<SALES>                                                 (49,872)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        (49,872)
<CGS>                                                       631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            52,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        5,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (7,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (7,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (7,919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0


</TABLE>
Final September 21, 2020 

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP) 

Center for Di ea e Control and Prevention 

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

September 22, 2020 

AGENDA ITEM PRESIDER PRESENTER(s) 

Tuesday, September 22, 2020 

10:00 Welcome & Introductions Dr. Jo é Romero (ACIP Chair) 

Dr. Amanda Cohn (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC) 

10:30 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines 

Introduction 

Overview of COVID-19 vaccine afety 

Enhanced vaccine afety urveillance 

Vaccine implementation 

Dr. Beth Bell (ACIP, WG Chair) 

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP) 

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC/NCEZID) 

Dr. Nancy Me onnier (CDC/NCIRD) 

12:00 Lunch

12:45 Di paritie among COVID-19 Epidemiology 

Overview of vaccine equity and prioritization framework 

Dr. Megan Wallace (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD) 

2:00 Break

2:15 Pha e 1 allocation for COVID-19 vaccine: Work Group con ideration Dr. Kathleen Dooling (CDC/NCIRD) 

3:30 Break

3:45 Public Comment 

4:30 Adjourn 

Acrony s

CDC Center for Di ea e Control and Prevention 

CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service 

COVID-19 Coronaviru di ea e 2019 

DoD Department of Defen e 

DVA Department of Veteran Affair 

EtR Evidence to Recommendation Framework 

FDA Food and Drug Admini tration 

GRADE Grading of Recommendation A e ment, Development and Evaluation 

HRSA Health Re ource and Service Admini tration 

IHS Indian Health Service 

NCHHSTP National Center for HIV, Hepatiti , STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/OID] 

NCIRD National Center for Immunization & Re piratory Di ea e [of CDC/OID] 

NCEZID National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Di ea e [of CDC/OID] 

NIAID National In titute of Allergy and Infectiou Di ea e 

OIDP Office of Infectiou Di ea e and HIV/AIDS Policy 

SAGE Strategic Advi ory Group of Expert 

SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute re piratory yndrome coronaviru 2 

WG Work Group 

WHO World Health Organization 

VE Vaccine Effectivene 

page 1 of 1
----

|   | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | Alkane, Inc. |                                    |
|--------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|               |         |                                    |   |
| Date: May 24, 2010 | By:          | /s/ Mathew Zuckerman               |   |
|               |         | Mathew Zuckerman                        |   |
|               |         | Chief Executive Officer & President |   |
No. 10-11001.

#### Arturo Oloverig Aglipay, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 200,

181 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6339.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 689.
# 2020 Codebook

# 2020 IISAR
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Howard R. Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., certify
that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 20, 2003

|/s/ Howard R. LevineHoward R. Levine
      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                                                 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-1538.

#### Peter Kalos and Veron Lee Kalos, Petitioners v. Greenwich Insurance Company, et al.

565 U.S. 827, 132 S. Ct. 119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5353.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 792.
# Delivery Totals

# OC AWP

# OO AWP

# WR AWP

# OC B52

# OC B1

# OC C130

# OC E3

# OC E6

# OC KC135

# OC KC10

# OC PMXG

# OC CMXG

# OO Generators

# OO A-10

# OO Landing Gear

# OO Pneudraulics

# OO C-130

# OO F-16

# OO Power Systems

# WR C-130 AMXG Bldg 364

# WR C-130 Carriage Kits (CMXG) 

# WR C-130J

# WR EMXG

# WR C-130

# WR C-5

# WR F-15

# WR C-17

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
PERIOD (DATES)

JOINT INVENTORY AND TRANSFER OF ACCOUNTABILITY

DAILY WEAPONS AND AMMUNITION CONTROL REGISTER

TYPE OF WEAPONS

AMMUNITION PISTOL PISTOL SHOTGUN OTHER AMMO AMMO CAPSTUN OTHER SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTABLE INDIVIDUALS TIME DATE

1ST

INVENTORY

IN ARMS ROOM

SIGNED OUT

TOTAL

2ND

INVENTORY

IN ARMS ROOM

SIGNED OUT

TOTAL

3RD

INVENTORY

IN ARMS ROOM

SIGNED OUT

TOTAL

RELIEVED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 3RD RELIEF

ACCEPTED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 1ST RELIEF

RELIEVED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 1ST RELIEF

ACCEPTED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 2ND RELIEF

RELIEVED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 2ND RELIEF

ACCEPTED

SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 3RD RELIEF

ISSUE AND TURN-IN OF WEAPONS AND AMMUNITION

TYPE

WEAPON SERIAL NO.

AMMUNITION

(Rounds)

DATE AND TIME

IN OUT

ISSUED TO

PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE

ISSUED

BY

(Initials)

WEAPON

RECEIPT

NUMBER

TURNE

D

IN BY

RECEIVED BY (Signature)

(FORM CONTINUES ON REVERSE SIDE)

DLA FORM 1639, FEB 2001 (EG) PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF THIS FORM ARE OBSOLETE. PDF (DLA)
TYPE

WEAPON

ISSUE AND TURN-IN OF WEAPONS AND AMMUNITION

SERIAL NO.

AMMUNITION

(Rounds)

DATE AND TIME

IN OUT

ISSUED TO

PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE

ISSUED

BY

(Initials)

WEAPON

RECEIPT

NUMBER

TURNE

D

IN BY

RECEIVED BY (Signature)

DLA FORM 1639, FEB 2001 (BACK) (EG)
### [ioiLDlNCOURTOF* 

## CATHYS.LUSK,CCE*1K FILECOPY RE: Case No. 15-0141 DATE: 2/19/2015 COA #: 12-13-00005-CV TC#: 2012-876-A STYLE:THE GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL, INC. v. RONALD MASTEN AND CHARLENE MASTEN 

### Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and • filed a motion for extension of time to file petition for reviewpursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.
MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354" TYLER, TX 75702
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Giovanny F. Laguan and Marina Del T. Martinez

v. Hilary J. Lloyd and Kimberly A. Lloyd

Appellate case number: 01-14-00693-CV

Trial court case number: 12-DCV-202692

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

On February 10, 2015, this Court ordered the appellants to provide written 

evidence from the court reporter, within 15 days, showing that appellants had requested 

and paid, or made arrangements to pay, for the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

34.6(b)(1), (2), 35.3(b)(2), (3), (c), 37.3(c)(1), (2). The February 10th Order further 

stated that if appellants failed to timely provide such evidence, this Court would consider 

and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a 

decision. See id. at 37.3(c).

On February 11, 2015, the court reporter filed an information sheet stating that she 

had just received partial payment for the reporter’s record on January 30, 2015, from 

appellant Laguan. However, since that date, there has been neither a further update from 

the court reporter regarding receipt of full payment for the reporter’s record, which has 

not been filed, nor have the appellants filed an extension of time to pay for that record.

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide only those issues or points that do 

not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellants’ 

brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. See id. at 2, 

38.6(a). Appellees’ brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing 

of appellants’ brief. See id. at 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 28, 2015
----

Exhibit 32.1

**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE**

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George Kazantzis, Acting President (Principal Financial Officer) and Nicholas Pappas (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 22nd day of August 2005.

  /s/ George Kazantzis  ____________________________  Name: George Kazantzis  Title: Acting President (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Nicholas Pappas  ___________________________  Name: Nicholas Pappas  Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)
Page 12 of 12
No. 10-11257.

#### Victor Detres, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 235,

181 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6839.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 4 A.3d 188.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



I,
Craig Huffman, the undersigned President of Treasure & Shipwreck Recovery, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, based
on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2023, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):



| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
August 31, 2023



|/s/
    Craig Huffman                                               | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Craig
    Huffman                                                   | 
|President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|(Principal
    Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  |
# 2021 Codebook

# 2021 IISAR
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11425 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO OSORIO-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-197-2-L

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sergio Osorio-Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United Statesafter deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. OsorioSanchez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Osorio-Sanchez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which chargedNo. 01-11425 -2- only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Osorio-Sanchez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss this appeal or, in the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. The motion for a summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government need not file an appellee’s brief. AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED.