alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-119.

#### Libertarian Party of New Hampshire, et al., Petitioners v. William M. Gardner, Secretary of State of New Hampshire.

565 U.S. 943, 132 S. Ct. 402,

181 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7254.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 6.
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A)/15d-14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, Wilson W. (Bill) Hendricks III, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer of Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Intrepid Global Imaging 3D Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ Wilson W. (Bill) Hendricks III By: Wilson W.
(Bill) Hendricks III, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

August 17, 2007

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1521** 

ELBERT HICKS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JOHN E. POTTER, U.S. Postal Service , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Jerome B. Friedman , Senior District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00246

- JBF

- FBS )

Submitted : October 26, 2011 Decided: November 7, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Elbert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elbert Hicks seeks to appeal the district co urt’s order dismissing without prejudice his employment discrimination complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders
. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because Hicks may proceed with this action by amending his complaint to provide specific facts showing his entitlement to the relief he seeks, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdi ction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
No. 10-11149.

#### Gary Wallace, Petitioner v. Ray Lawler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

565 U.S. 869, 132 S. Ct. 221,

181 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6680.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1239 KA 11-02401 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES G. JAMIESON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered May 20, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of misdemeanor driving while intoxicated, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree and leaving the scene of a personal injury incident resulting in death without reporting.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.12 [1]), leaving the scene of a personal injury incident resulting in death without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2] [a], [c] [ii]), and driving while intoxicated (§ 1192 [3]). We agree with defendant that his purported waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable because the record does not establish that County Court “ ‘engaged in a full and adequate colloquy, and [that] defendant expressly waived [his] right to appeal without limitation’ ” ( People v Maracle , 19 NY3d 925, 928; see People v Jackson , 99 AD3d 1240, ___). Nevertheless, based on our review of the record, we perceive no basis for reducing defendant’s sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3226 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to prohibit the use of firefighting foam 

containing perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. KIM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to prohibit the use of 

firefighting foam containing perfuoroalkyl or 

polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Water for Mili5 tary Families Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF PFAS BY DEPARTMENT OF 

7 DEFENSE. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 1, 

10 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3226 IH

1 Department of Defense uses only non-fluorinated 

2 firefighting foam, which does not contain covered 

3 PFAS. 

4 (2) COVERED PFAS.—In this subsection, the 

5 term ‘‘covered PFAS’’ means a perfuoroalkyl or 

6 polyfluoroalkyl substance with at least one fully 

7 fluorinated carbon atom. 

8 (b) STUDY.— 

9 (1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of De10 fense shall conduct a study of the best practices to 

11 clean up ground contaminated by perfuoroalkyl or 

12 polyfluoroalkyl substances. 

13 (2) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under 

14 subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

15 (A) evaluate best practices in the cleanup 

16 (not including incineration) of ground contami17 nated by perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl sub18 stances; 

19 (B) determine the estimated costs of the 

20 different types of cleanup methods; and 

21 (C) estimate the length of time for various 

22 types of cleanup methods. 

23 (3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after 

24 the date on which funds are made available to carry 

25 out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3226 IH

1 shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of 

2 the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

3 Armed Services of the Senate a report that de4 scribes— 

5 (A) the findings and conclusions of the 

6 study; and 

7 (B) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2625

JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, for all persons injured in

cars and light trucks as well as all killed in

United States by auto or light trucks

accidents,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION;

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GENERAL

MOTORS CORPORATION, Detroit; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Detroit; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Detroit,

Michigan; TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, Georgetown, Kentucky,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98-

2977-L)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se.
* The order from which Young appeals was filed on September 9,

1998, and entered on the district court’s docket September 10,

1998, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson

v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Young appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Young

v. United States Dep’t of Transp., No. CA-98-2977-L (D. Md. Sept.

10, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3009 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a distracted driving 

education grant program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Miss RICE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a 

distracted driving education grant program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Distracted Driving 

5 Education Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISTRACTED DRIVING EDUCATION GRANT PRO7 GRAM. 

8 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than October 1, 

9 2020, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a 

10 distracted driving education grant program. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3009 IH

1 (b) GRANT AUTHORITY.—In carrying out the pro2 gram established under subsection (a), the Secretary may 

3 make grants, on a competitive basis, to nonprofit organi4 zations. 

5 (c) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.—A grant made under sub6 section (b) shall be used to provide education to the public 

7 regarding the risks of distracted driving, including texting 

8 or otherwise using a personal wireless communications de9 vice while driving. 

10 (d) APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible for a grant made 

11 under subsection (b), a nonprofit organization shall sub12 mit to the Secretary an application in such form, at such 

13 time, and containing such information as the Secretary 

14 determines appropriate. 

15 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

16 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to make 

17 grants under subsection (b) $5,000,000 for each of fiscal 

18 years 2021 and 2022. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                ------------

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Falcon Products, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended November 2, 2002, I, Michael J. Dreller,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  such Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended November 2,
          2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in such Form 10-K of the Company for the
          period ended November 2, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.


Date: January 28, 2003                           /s/  Michael J. Dreller
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Michael J. Dreller
                                                 Vice President, Finance and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-11219.

#### Gerard Jerry Snapp, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 229,

181 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7112.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 706.
No. 11-5653.

#### Alejandro Hernandez-Rojas, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 337,

181 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6270.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 67.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO

No. 08-17-00205-CV

In the Matter of the Temporary Guardianship of the Person and Estate of Eduardo

Fuentes Varela, an Adult

(No. 2016-CGD00220 IN PROBATE COURT NO 1 OF EL PASO COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPP. CLERK'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $10.00

$1,830.50

$0.00

$0.00

$205.00 E-PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

E-PAID TONI NAPIER

BLANCO ORDONEZ MATA & WALLACE

N/A

TONI NAPIER

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DENISE PACHECO

, CLERK OF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and

styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Eighth District of Texas, this May 24, 2018.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk
93

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Iowa

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $30.1 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 5,100

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 55,100

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $1,285 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $225.4 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $65.7 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $291.1 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 10%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$8.4 $10.5 $2.73 $3.42

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$2.5 $3.6 $0.81 $1.17

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $7.6 $12.1 $2.47 $3.94

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$1.9 $2.6 $0.60 $0.85

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.9 $1.3 $0.30 $0.43

TOTAL $21.3 $30.1 $6.91 $9.81

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
William C. Bopp, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking
Systems, Inc.







Date:
      November 6, 2009
            /s/ William C.
      BoppWilliam
      C. BoppChief
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39586-39587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Nat Inst. of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1-1-GRB-7-03.
    Date: August 4, 1998.
    Time: 3:00 pm to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Building 45, Room 6AS 25F, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 
6AS-37, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-7799.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1-GRB5-02 P.
    Date: August 9-11, 1998.
    Time: August 9, 1998, 7:30 pm to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriot, 934 16th Street, Denver, CO 80202.
    Contact Person: Francisco O. Calvo, PhD, Chief, Special Emphasis 
Panel, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6AS-37E, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-
8897.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 7 02 P.
    Date: August 10-12, 1998.
    Time: August 10, 1998, 7:30 pm to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 39587]]

    Place: St Louis Marriot Pavillion, One Broadway, St Louis, MO 
63102.
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 
6AS-37, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-7799.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-19662 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Privacy Reminders

6. Replying / Forwarding E-mail Strings.

BEFORE replying / forwarding an e-mail string STOP and ENSURE the e-mail string does 

not contain any personal information / personally identifiable information (PII). If the e-mail 

does contain PII, ensure that all recipients have a need to know and the e-mail is encrypted 

when sent. All DLA employees are reminded that it is DLA policy to encrypt e-mails 

containing personal information/PII. Source-HQ LAN Manager e-mail; Subject "Digital 

Signature and Encryption Implementation - CTO 07-15 Task 1" dated June 5, 2008.

<Return to Reminders Table>