alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4235-N-40]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Johnston, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7256, 
451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1226; 
TDD number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these 
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V 
information line at 1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.
Fred Karnas, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 98-1940 Filed 1-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedFebruary 27, 2006 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Federal Realty Investment Trust on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Federal Realty Investment Trust on Form S-3 (File No. 333-100819, 333-84210, 333-97945, 333-63619, File No. 33-63687, File No. 33-63955, File No. 33-15264 and FileNo. 33-55111). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Vienna, VA 

February 27, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Eric Smit, the chief financialofficer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Homer H. BRELAND and The State Mississippi for the use and benefit Homer H. Breland, Appellants, v. J. K. McLENDON et al., Appellees.

No. 20815.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 19, 1964.

*316Dan E. Breland, Jackson, Miss., Homer H. Breland, Nyack, N. Y., of counsel, for appellants.

Harry O. Hoffman, Jr., Hazlehurst, Miss., William Saunders Henley, Jackson, Miss., J. L. Lotterhos, Jr., Hazle-hurst, Miss., Henley, Jones & Henley, Jackson, Miss., Armstrong & Hoffman, Hazlehurst, Miss., of counsel, for appel-lees.

Before BROWN, MOORE * and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff (appellant) brought this action against police officers of the town of Wesson, Mississippi, the Sheriff of Co-piak County and the Sheriff’s surety. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. The theory of the action is false arrest and illegal imprisonment. The arrest occurred late on the night of October 18, 1960, because plaintiff was admittedly driving his car while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Instead of returning to his place of residence as suggested by the arresting officer, plaintiff persisted in his determination to seek additional whiskey at a liquor store. He was placed in the county jail. Before he could be taken before any magistrate in the morning he posted bail, left the jail and was unavailable for further proceedings.

Claiming that his arrest was motivated by the unlawful purpose of putting him in jail and collecting a hundred dollars and was made with no intention of bringing him before a magistrate, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. This, motion was denied. He then elected not. to prosecute further. The court thereupon dismissed the action for want of prosecution. Upon this appeal only the-propriety of the summary judgment decision is in issue.

Because plaintiff premises his case-upon unlawful purpose and intent, there-are issues of fact which must be resolved, before these conclusions can be properly determined. The denial of the summary judgment motion did not preclude plaintiff from a trial of these issues. Surely plaintiff was not entitled upon the facts-presented by affidavits to have the trial court assume that defendants were possessed of illegal intent and purpose when they sought to restrain an intoxicated, driver for continuing on a course possibly far more detrimental to him and the-community than a few hours in jail.. These issues could only have been resolved upon a trial which plaintiff voluntarily elected to forego.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 12

                                         FARMERS GROUP, INC.
                                          AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                      COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO
                                    OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                        (Amounts in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Years ended December 31,
                                      2000          1999          1998          1997          1996
                                   ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

<S>                                <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Consolidated income before
 provision for taxes               $1,188,543    $1,103,900    $  950,562    $1,002,106    $  863,143

Add:
  Portion of rents
   representative of interest          11,189         9,576         7,444         7,120         6,707
  Interest                             43,002        45,552        43,935        45,031        52,883
                                   ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Income, as adjusted                $1,242,734    $1,159,028    $1,001,941    $1,054,257    $  922,733
                                   ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Fixed Charges:
  Portion of rents
   representative of interest      $   11,189    $    9,576    $    7,444    $    7,120    $    6,707
  Interest                             43,002        45,552        43,935        45,031        52,883
                                   ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Total fixed charges                $   54,191    $   55,128    $   51,379    $   52,151    $   59,590
                                   ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges:                               22.9 x        21.0 x        19.5 x        20.2 x        15.5 x

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-107, RM-9288]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Gaylord, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Darby 
Advertising, Inc., proposing the substitution of Channel 268A for 
Channel 237A at Gaylord, Michigan, and modification of the license for 
Station WMJZ to specify operation on Channel 268A. Channel 268A can be 
allotted to Gaylord, Michigan, at petitioner's specified site (45-01-33 
and 84-39-40). Canadian concurrence will be requested for this 
allotment. In addition, we will not accept competing expressions of 
interest for the use of Channel 268A at Gaylord because no upgrade in 
facilities is contemplated.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Allan C. Campbell, Irwin, 
Campbell, & Tannenwald, P.C., 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, N.w., Suite 20, 
Washington, D. C. 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-107, adopted June 24, 1998, 
and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19307 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

**After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/29/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

JEROLD G. CAUTHON,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-3052

v. D. KAN.

CHARLES (NMI) SIMMONS,

MICHAEL A. NELSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 95-3023-DES)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

On January 4, 1996, this panel entered an order and judgment affirming the district

court’s denial of Mr. Cauthon’s request for mandamus relief. See Cauthon v. Simmons,

No. 95-3022, (10th Cir. Jan. 4, 1996). This appeal is a companion appeal to that case.**
***Because this matter and case number 95-3022 were filed well before the

enactment of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, we do not reach the question whether Mr.

Cauthon is obligated to pay the filing fee in this appeal. 

- 2 -

The sole issue presented is whether the district court properly denied Mr. Cauthon’s

request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We hold that the court was correct, and

affirm on that basis. Mr. Cauthon’s request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is

granted***. The district court is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel

Circuit Judge
# C_2013252EN.01003201.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/32

---

Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Endoceutics/OHIM — Merck (FEMIVIA)

(Case T-324/13)

2013/C 252/53

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Endoceutics, Inc. (Quebec, Canada) (represented by: M. Wahlin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 15 April 2013, in Case R 1021/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 15 April 2013, in Case R 1021/2012-4;

| — | Reject the opposition of the other party and allow registration of the Community trade mark applied for, namely the application for the mark FEMIVIA under application No. 9 386 343; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject the opposition of the other party and allow registration of the Community trade mark applied for, namely the application for the mark FEMIVIA under application No. 9 386 343;

| — | Order the other party to pay the applicant’s costs on the appeal and regarding the proceedings before the OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to pay the applicant’s costs on the appeal and regarding the proceedings before the OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘FEMIVIA’, for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application No 9 386 343

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark of the word mark ‘FEMIBION’, for goods in class 5 and International registration with effect in the European Union for the figurative mark in black and white ‘femibion’ for goods of classes 5 29 and 30

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-10295.

#### Anthony Antonio Sims, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 833, 132 S. Ct. 134,

181 L. Ed. 2d 54,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6209.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 666.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.22-1 APPENDIX 3.22

AP3.22. APPENDIX 3.22

LOGISTICS REASSIGNMENT GENERAL 

MANAGEMENT DATA

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD 

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code 

1-3 Enter DIC DLS.

Routing Identifier Code 

(TO)

4-6 Enter RIC identifying the gaining item 

manager to which the transaction is being 

forwarded.

Review Period Indicator 7 Enter review period indicator 1 or 2 in 

accordance with appendix AP2.19.

National Stock Number 8-20 Enter NSN of item being transferred.

Blank 21-23 Leave blank.

Routing Identifier Code 

(FROM)

24-26 Enter RIC identifying the losing item 

manager preparing the transaction.

Date (Extracted) 27-31 Enter date data was extracted from files. 

(Enter two-digit year in record positions 

27-28 and three-digit ordinal day in record 

positions 29-31).

Unit Cube 32-38 Enter the actual maximum cube of unit 

pack in feet (rounded to three decimals); 

otherwise, leave blank.

Unit Weight 39-43 Enter maximum gross weight of unit pack 

in pounds (rounded to two decimals); 

otherwise, leave blank.

Date (Last Buy) 44-48 Enter date of last purchase request 

initiation (enter two-digit year in record 

positions 44-45 and three- digit ordinal day 

in record positions 46-48); otherwise, 

leave blank.

Date (Last Demand) 49-53 Enter date last demand was recorded 

(enter two-digit year in record positions 

49-50 and three-digit ordinal day in record 

positions 51-53); otherwise, leave blank.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.22-2 APPENDIX 3.22

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD 

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Production Lead-time 

(Days)

54-56 Enter number of production lead-time 

days; otherwise, leave blank.

Essentiality 57 Enter essentiality code; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Blank 58 Leave blank.

Requirement Contract 

Indicator

59 Enter Y (yes) if a current term/requirement 

type contract is available for placement of 

purchase orders for stock replenishment 

and/or direct delivery to requisitioners; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Date (Contract End) 60-64 Enter date current contract will end (enter 

two-digit year in record positions 60-61 

and three-digit ordinal day in record 

positions 62-64); otherwise, leave blank.

Contract Extension 

Options

65 Enter 0 if contract cannot be extended 

beyond current end date. Enter 1, 2, 3, 

etc. for each year, if contract contains 

optional contract extension clauses; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Quantity (Total 

Onhand/Due-in 

Wholesale Assets)

66-75 Enter the sum of the onhand and due-in 

wholesale assets for this NSN as reflected 

in the sum of record 1, record positions 32-

41, of DICs DLU and DLV respectively.

Blank 76-80 Leave blank.
Florida 6225 Ulmerton Road

· Clearwater, Florida 33760 800.659.2080 

## National Aviation Academy New England 150 Hanscom Drive Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 800.292.3228

October 23, 2012

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20591 Subject: Extension ofexemption from Code ofFederal Regulations 14 CFR, Part 65.75(a) to allowthe Aviation Mechanic General (AMG) written tests to be administered after completing the corresponding portion ofthe curriculum. Exemption Number: 10211 DocketNumber: FAA-2010-1256

Dear Sir or Madam,
National Aviation Academy-NewEngland (NAA-NE) operates an FAAApproved 

### .-... c::::>

....... <:::) L) --t w 

# u**~** .r= 

### .r::

,· Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) in Bedford, Massachusetts under Air Agency Certificate EC6T068K PETITION: NAA-NE is requesting an extension ofExemptionNumber: 10211 relating to 14 CFR, Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) to be administered after AMTS students successfully complete the correspondingportion ofthe curriculum. · RELIEF SOUGHT: NAA-NE is seeking an extension ofthe exemption from 14 CFRPart 65.75(a) to allow students enrolled in its FAA Approved 14 CFRPart 147 Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) to take the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) after completingthe corresponding portion ofthe curriculum, priorto meeting the experience requirements of§65.77. PERSON(S) TO BE COVERED BY THE EXEMPTION: NAA-NE, Air Agency Certificate Number EC6T068K and students enrolled in its AMTS program in the Airframe, Powerplant and Airframe and Powerplant cirrricula. www.naa.edu
\..--:' C..J-ICJ C)?=J,-n**~-E--:-o** 

## -lc555; o-u--; -oOs: rn::orn**::o~z** ::1>--;-i 

### -i-o 

## oo.,., zZ. (f:JExemption Extension Request Page 2 of2

Information, views or arguments to support the action sought: There has been no change inthe conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition wouldbe detrimental to NAA-NE and the students it serves.

Respectfully Submitted, 

# .4L. 

# j//7---L--

Glenn S. Bender Director ofEducation National Aviation Academy-NewEngland

CC: William J. Fullam, PMI Flight Standards District Office One Cranberry Hill, Suite 402 Lexington, Massachusetts 02421-7394
No. 11-5830.

#### William Stevens, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 922, 132 S. Ct. 350,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7040.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-11232.

#### Carl P. Glaviano, Petitioner v. Larry Denney, Warden.

565 U.S. 874, 132 S. Ct. 231,

181 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6621.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.13. APPENDIX 6.13**

**MILSTRIP PART NUMBER/NON-NSN MESSAGE REQUISITION**

FROM:  {APPROPRIATE INDICATOR OF SENDER}

TO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE(S)}

SUBJECT:  MILSTRIP REQUISITIONS

1. A0E/FHZ/2/350451234567899/EA/00040/FB2300/0150/0111/R/BLNK/A/12/089/BLNK/02/ 154/29

· INDENTIFICATION DATA {INCLUDE ONLY APPLICABLE INFORMATION, PRESERVING THE ALPHA DESIGNATOR.}

A. CAGE CODE AND PART NUMBER <USE TOTAL CAGE CODE AND PART NUMBER WHEN TOO LARGE FOR RP 8-22\ WHEN PLACED HERE LEAVE RP 8-22 BLANK>.

B. MFG. NAME

C. MFG. CAT. AND DATE

D. TECH. ORD. NO.

E. TECH.MAN.NO.

F. END ITEM APPL.

G. NAME/DESCRIPTION

H. MAKE

I. MODEL NO.

J. SERIES

K. SERIAL NO.

L. COLOR

M. SIZE

REMARKS:  WHEN ADDITIONAL DATA NOT COVERED ABOVE, IS FURNISHED.

#### SAMPLE

***1***

APPENDIX 1.13

AP6.13-1

APPENDIX 6.13
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-KSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report):



|1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards      
|Larry Edwards          
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 31, 2008