## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 1 of 9 

### Erick F. Larsen

Consultant to

Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

262 W. Linden Ave. # C Burbank, LA, Ca 91502
818

- 732

- 0330 ErickLarsen@Outlook.com January 7, 2016

- Via electroni c filing

- U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request (Petition) for Exemption from Certain Regulations per Section 333 of the FAA Reform
Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviatio n Regulations

Dear Madam or Sir :

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, professional photographer, Brian Harvey Hogue d/b/a Arable Media ( Hogue

, Arable
Media

, Petitioner, or Operato r) hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) to allow business use (commercial operation) of his fleet of Unoccupied (unmanned) Aerial Systems (UAS), so long as such operations are conducted within and under the

co nditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner, Brian Harvey Hogue is a United States born citizen who has a US Passport and an

Arizona Dr iver’s License . He performs expert professional c inematography, videography, photography, graphic design, and business marketing services worldwide, with the following
contact information:

Brian Harvey Hogue
Co Founder & CEO
Arable Media

Headquarters: 325 S Higley Road Suite 110 Gilbert, Arizona 8529 6 BHH@Arable.Media

Tel: 520

- 404

- 4104

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 2 of 9 http://www.arable.media www.facebook.com/Arable

- Media

- 72696422067 2754/ www.linkedin.com/company/arable

- media @ArableMedia (twitter)

Hogue co

- founded Arable Media on the idea that the people and places of agricu lture deserve to be shared through c aptivating visual stories. D eeply rooted industry knowledge bring s those stories
to life.

Arable Media maintains a highly creative and skilled team of pr ofessionals who work through every part of telling their client’s story, from pre

- production, scripting, storyboarding and casting to on

location or in

- studio shooting, post production, editing, graphics creation and content distribution.

S ervices include ground based and aerial photography, cinematography

, graphic arts

, and creative
story development. Creating outstanding content , in order enhance the understanding of agriculture by telling visual stories with respect and honesty, t o preserve client milestones and to populate business marketing materials

, are Arable Med ia’s forte. Hogue produces some of the finest photography and graphics using the most advanced methods and tools possible

.

Arable Media has develo ped numerous diverse clients in need of safe and lawful commercial UAS

services and training

. Growth of p etit ioner’s UAS business services will provide new jobs and an

incr eased level of safety to many who currently are in need of UAS commercial services. Current FAA UAS policy prevents Petitioner from providing civil UAS commercial services in the absence of
the requested exemption.

A. Commercial UAS Operations to Be Conducted:

Petitioner seeks to operate his fleet of UAS to conduct closed

- set motion picture and television (MPT) filming and production, UAS training

, and aerial data coll ection (ADC) which includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the unmanned aircraft (UA). Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measur ement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by instruments aboard the UA.

In particular Petitioner seeks authorization to conduct commercial UAS training and remote ADC, mapping, surveying, photography, filming, videography, demonstrations

, sampling, mea suring, and inspections of (or for):

1.) Construction, architectural, engineering, website development, insurance, risk management, security, real estate, resort, golf, cemetery, entertainment, weddings, sports, utility, energy (oil, gas, solar, wind, & elect ric), hydro (water), transportation (port, rail, truck, auto, & bus), mining, bridge, telecommunications, agriculture (farming, ranching, & growing) flare s tack, platform, tower, pole, pipeline and other infrastructure, structures, sites, systems, features and operations; and,

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 3 of 9 2.) Recreational, commercial, governmental, Emergency Management Agencies (EMA) and entities; and,

3.) Environmental, scientific, archaeology, conservation, climate change, natural

resource, wildlife, oceanographic, forestry, weather, searc h & rescue, emergency services, humanitarian relief, public & private entity support, assistance and monitoring
of infrastructure, structures, sites, systems, features, and operations; and,

4.) Research, education, training, development, testing, certificatio n, and validation of safe and
lawful civil, commercial, public, experimental, hobby, and recreational UAS curriculum, education, and safe flight training, demonstrations, and events involving UAS design, manufacture, assembly, purchase, sale, maintenance, repair, inspection, safe operation, record keeping, and required FAA documentation.

Hereinafter, 1 through 4 , above, closed

- set motion picture and television (MPT) filming and production, and UAS training are refer red to as petitioner’s “ proposed operatio ns or operations".

B. Petitioner’s Commercial UAS Aircraft Fleet and Operating D ocuments :

Petitioner references as his operating documents , this petition, his proprietary motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) appendix A (submitted confide ntially), and the specific
manufacturer’s model specific aircraft documentation, including Flight Operations Manual (FOM)

, for each UAS in his fleet, listed below, which set forth safety considerations, training, general and specific operating procedures, specifications, inspection, maintenance, setup of the UAS, and all other required and recommended procedures for the proposed operations.

DJI Inspire 1 http://www.dji.com/product/inspire

- 1/do wnload

DJI Inspire 1 Pro http://store.dji.com/product/inspire

- 1

- pro#/spec

DJI Phantom 3 Professional h ttp://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3/download

DJI Phantom 3 Advanced http://www .dji.com/product/phantom

- 3

DJI Spreading Wings S900 http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s900

DJI Spreading Wings S1000 http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s1000

- plus

Fr eefly Systems Alta http://freeflysystems.com/alta

Each UAS in petitioner’s fleet (listed above) has previously been granted 333 authorizations by the

FAA. Commercial operations of any other type of aircraft require a new or amended FAA 333

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 4 of 9 petition. Each of petitioner’s UAS will be duly registered with the FAA which will ass ign registration , “N”, numbers before operations are commenced

.

C. Specific Regulations for which an exemption is sought:

14 CFR 61.113 (a) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.119 (b) & (c)

1 4 CPR 91. 121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CPR 409 (a) (1) & (2) 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b)

II. PETITIONER’S PROPOSED OPERATIONS DO NOT CREATE SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS

Each UAS utilized by Petitioner is an electric multi

- rotor craft , weighing less than 55 lbs. including ADC payload and has been previously approved by the FAA for commercial operations

. Each operates at a speed of no more than 100 mph (87 knots) and has the capability to hover, and/or
move in a vertical and hori zontal plane simultaneously. Each will only be operated as visual line of sight (VLOS), remain under 400 ft. above ground level (AGL), and will operate only over private or controlled access property with permission from the owner/controller of the property or

au thorized representative.

During petitioner’s proposed operations the site will be secured and non

- participants will be kept at least 500 feet away from the operation unless barriers or structures are present that sufficiently
protect non

- participants in t he event of an accident or loss of control.

III. PETITIONER'S PROPOSED OPERATIONS ARE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

The FAA has issued a Grant of Exemption s to FalconSkyCam

, Exemption No. 11195

, Docket No FAA

2014

- 0884 (March 6, 2015) and to Measure, a 32 Advisors C ompany, LLC

, Exemption No. 12646

, Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1602 ( August 28, 2015 ), for operations that are substantially similar to those proposed herein. In issuing the Grant to FalconSkyCam , the FAA noted that "[t]he enhanced safety
and reduced environmental impact achieved using a UAS with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest."

IV. EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

Hogue proposes that his fleet of UAS

, with the characteristics and as operated with the limitations listed below, provide for at least an equiva lent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory framework.

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 5 of 9 These limitations and conditions to which Petitioner agrees to be bound when conducting commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include:

1.) Each UAS utiliz ed by Petitioner will weigh Less than 55 lbs, operate at a speed of no more than 100 mph (87 knots), and will remain under 400 ft. (AGL). 2.) Flights will be operated only during daylight hours, only in visual meteorological conditions, and only within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the pilot in command (PIC) of the UAS. 3.) All operations will utilize a visual observer (VO) in addition to the pilot in command (PIC). 4.) Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be less than 45 minutes, or when
the Low Battery warning activates.

V. EXEMPTIONS REQUESTED

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b): Private, Recreational, or Sport vs. Commercial Pilot Certificates

Sections 61.113 (a) and (b) prohibit private , recreational, or sport certified pilots from operating a

t raditional aircraft for compensation or hire. Petitioner proposes that his PIC will have at least a private , recreational, or sport pilot’s certificate, and a current FAA medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or
the Federal government. Petitioner’s PIC will also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

Petitione r will not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under petitioner’s exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropri ate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency will be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Dedicated UAS f lights for the purposes of training the petitioner’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and for determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS
will be operated under petitioner’s exemption

, are requested by petitioner to be allowed under the
terms of th is exemption.

PIC and VO training operations will only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations will be considered nonparticipants, and the PIC will operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

Based upon the above and for the reasons set forth in the FAA's grant of an exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Petitioner does not believe a commerc ial pilot c ertificate is necessary for his proposed operation s . See, e.g., In the matter of the petition of Astraeus Aerial, Exemption No. 11062 (issued Sept. 25, 2014). For those reasons, Petitioner requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b ).

14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 6 of 9 Section 91.7 prohibits operation of an unairworthy aircraft, and places responsibility for
airworthiness determina tions on the PIC. Petitioner’s UAS will not have an airworthiness certificate,
and the re is no FAA regulatory standard for determining airworthiness of the UAS. Additionally, Petitioner's operating documents, includi ng FOM, set forth inspection and maintenance procedures to ensure airworthiness. For these reasons, and in accordance with the FAA's grant of an exemption from section 91.7 to Total Safety U.S., Inc., Hogue requests an exemption from 14 CFR. § 91.7(a). See, e.g., In the matter of the petition of Total Safety U.S., Inc., Exemption No. 11156 (issued Jan. 29, 2015).

14 C.F.R. §91.1 19 (b) and (c): Minimum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (b) prohibits aircraft in congested areas from flying less than 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a
horizontal radi us of 2,000 feet of the aircraft. To the extent that Petitioner’s proposed operations would be considered to be in "congested areas," Petitioner's operating documents and procedures, and the size, weight and speed of each UAS in the petitioner’s fleet of U AS, provide an equivalent level of safety such that the proposed operations at lower safe altitudes should be allowed.

Hogue will establish a 500' buffer/sterile area for his operations that will exclude personnel not associated with the operations. Petit ioner will also exercise additional control over the sterile area

as needed . Consequently, Hogue believes these procedures will reduce or eliminate any potential adverse impacts to safety for o perations in congested areas. Hogue therefore requests an

exemp tion from 14 CFR § 91.119(b).

Section 91.119 (c) prohibits operations in other than congested areas below 500 feet above the surface, or closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure. Since this exemption is
for UAS that fly similarly t o a helicopter and requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 ft. AGL, an exemption may be needed to allow such proposed operations.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of each of petitioner’s

UAS as wel l as the location where they will be operated. As discussed above, p etitioner will
establish a sterile area, including safety buffers of 500 feet for personnel not associated with the operation. Hogue there fore requests an exemption from Section 91.119(c) for all necessary and authorized personnel associated with the proposed operations.

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain a cruising altitude by
reference to an altimeter that is set " ... to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure." As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a constant GPS altitude read out, an exemption is requested.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 7 of 9 Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

- (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes."

Maximum total flight time for each of the proposed operations will be n o more than approximately

45 minutes. Flights will be safely landed when the battery falls below its nominal voltage, should that occur prior to completion of the operation. Each of petitioner’s UAS has a constant battery voltage display and a Low Voltage LED Warning which alerts when the battery reaches pre

determined levels. This battery level would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area when the Low Voltage Warning
alerts.

For thes e reasons, Hogue requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151 (a). Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808.

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (1) & (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintena nce Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner "shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have disc repancies repaired as prescr ibed in part 43 of this chapter ...," and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

As provided in petitioner’s operating documents, the operator and the PIC will ensure that the UAS

is in safe wo rking order prior to initiating each flight, and the operator will perform required maintenance and inspections, and keep a log of any maintenance performed.

VI. REGULATIONS FOR WHICH EXEMPTIONS ARE UNNECESSARY

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has i ssued numerous prior exemptions for many different types of UAS and UAS operations. In those exemptions, the agency noted that exemptions from certain regulations were not necessary, due to "the size, weight, speed and limited operating
area associated wit h [the UAS] and its operation."

Based upon the FAA's guidance and the fact that each of petitioner’s UAS is even smaller and slower than many of those UAS in previously issued exemptions, Petitioner believes exemptions from the following regulations are n ot necessary:

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b): Marking of the Aircraft. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(b): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction.

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 8 of 9 Hogue also believes that an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action is not necessary. This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. An FAA approved rotorcraft flight manual will not be provided for the aircraft. An

e quivalent level of safety will be provided as set forth in this petition and in petitioner’s operating documents duly referenced as part of this request.

The FAA has previously found that adherence to procedures contained in an applicant's operating
docum ents demonstrate compliance with § 91.103, and therefore an exemption from the regulation was not necessary. See, e.g., In the matter of the petition of Total Safety U.S., Inc., Exemption No. 11156 (issued Jan. 29, 2015).

P etitioner's PIC will take all ac tions including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff clearance distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight to ensure the safety of the flight. Consequently, in light of this agency's prior finding in Tot al Safety U.S., Inc., Hogue does not believe an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103 is necessary.

If it is determined that the petitioner does require exemptions from any of t h e provisions from
which it has herein stated that it believes no exemption is required: Petitioner requests that such exemptions be granted upon the basis of all that he has stated in this petition and in his operating
documents.

Petitioner has shown that g ood cause exists for not publishing a summary of this petition in the
Feder al Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption summarily and w ithout delay.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be deter mined that publication is necessary :

Petitioner seeks an exemption from the following rules: 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b); 91.7 (a); 91.119 (b) and (c); 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (1) & (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to conduct closed

- set motion picture and television (MPT) filming and production, UAS training, and aerial data collection (ADC ) which includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the Unoccupied (Unmanned) Aircraft (UA).

Privacy All of the proposed operations, UAS flights, will occur only over private or controlled access property with permission from the owner/controller of the property or authorized representative. Petitioner’s proposed operations will be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations governing privacy at the venue of the flight operation.

## Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

- 333 Petition

January 7, 2016 P a g e | 9 of 9 VII. CONCLUSION

Hogue has requested to use his fleet of UAS for closed

- set motion picture and television (MPT) filming and production, UAS training, and aerial data collection (ADC)

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those p resented in this petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), and 12645 to Allied Drones ( see Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0804), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no

passengers or crew, ra ther than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Upon review of petitioner ’s reasons for reque sting this exemption, It should be determined that:

1.) Petitioner’s requests, in all material respects , are th e same as the relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, 11213, and 12645; 2.) The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, 11213,
and 12645 also apply to the situation petitioner present s ; and 3.) A grant of exemption to petitioner is in the public interest.

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, Hogue should be granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to t he extent nece ssary to allow petitioner’s proposed operations.

Satisfaction of all of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012

- size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated area s and daylight UAS operations wi thin visual line of sight (VLOS) and national security

- provide more than adequate justification to grant the requested exemptions allowing the proposed operations in the NAS by petitioner

, Brian Harvey Hogue d/b/a Arable Media

.

Respectfully,

/Signed/ 

### Erick F. Larsen

Consultant to

Brian Harvey Hogue

- Arable Media

262 W. Linden Ave. # C Burbank, LA, Ca 91502
818

- 732

- 0330 ErickLarsen@Outlook.com