alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-5834.

#### Timothy Carver, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6437.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 796.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory A. Serrao,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, of American Dental Partners, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GREGORY A. SERRAO                                             
|Gregory A. Serrao, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 16, 2009
#### *Bear, Petitioner, v. Underwood, Respondent,*

No. 92164-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32127-4-III, May 26, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1035. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065803
<NAME>                        ORANGE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,730
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,730
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 06,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,160
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       206
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,730
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,558)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|February 1, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ KENNETH S. ORD                                  
|                 |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                 |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
1

DLMS Implementation Metrics

Warfighter Always

The Nation’s Combat Logistics Support Agency

Established 1961

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DLA

2

DLMS Implementation Metrics

Percentage of all MILS and DLMS transactions processed IN and OUT of DLA Transaction Services

16.4 million DLMS processed in April 2006 and approximately 60 million DLMS processed in May 2023.

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

3

DLMS Supply Implementation Metrics

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

4

DLMS Implementation Transaction Counts

Total MILS and DLMS transactions (in millions) processed for the month ending the quarter.

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

5

DLMS Implementation Transaction Counts

Total MILS and DLMS transactions (in millions) processed for the month ending the quarter.

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

6

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

# Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet.xlsx

# Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet1.xlsx

# Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet2.xlsx

# Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet3.xlsx

# image3.png

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image4.png

# image6.png

# image5.png

# image7.png

# image8.png
No. 11-5032.

#### Joseph Pope, Petitioner v. Mark Bernard, et al.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 261,

181 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5323,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
May 11, 2016 Dear Sir or Madam, OlofEkbergh has been issued an exemption, Regulatory Docket No FAA-2015-7256 and exemption numbered 16182 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose ofaerial photography and videography ofboating safety, tourism, model aircraft safety and real estate
. OlofEkbergh hereby respectfully requests an amendment to the exemption to allow two additional type ofunmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with' the conditions of**t~e** Exemption
. , . OlofEkbergh wishes to additionally operate a DJI Phantom 4, DJI Inspire, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Inspire 2 and DJI Phantom 4 under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Sent t,Inder separate cover, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS. All operations ofthe additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms ofthe Exemption. As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking only for the addition of another type ofunmanned aerial vehicle, OlofEkbergh respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Please feel free to contact the undersigned should you have any question or concerns concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption
.

OlofEkbergh Westside A V Studios POB 457 484 Upper Westside Road North Conway NH 03860-0457 (603) 383-9283 Site: www.\VestsideAV.com Email:**Q!.Q.lli'. ~}** **Vv** estside AV. com

I' 1. ,;_
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

The subsidiaries of the Company as of October 26, 2007 are as follows:



|                                          |  |            |  |                             
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                        |  |            |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|                                          | 
|Advanced Input Devices, Inc.              |  | Delaware  
|Memtron Technologies Co.                  |  | Delaware  
|Advanced Input Devices (UK) Ltd.          |  | England   
|LRE Medical GmbH                          |  | Germany   
|Esterline Input Devices (Shanghai) Ltd.   |  | China     
|                                          | 
|Armtec Defense Products Co.               |  | Delaware  
|Armtec Countermeasures Co.                |  | Delaware  
|Armtec Countermeasures TNO Co.            |  | Delaware  
|Wallop Defence Systems                    |  | England   
|                                          | 
|Auxitrol Technologies S.A.                |  | France    
|Auxitrol S.A.                             |  | France    
|Esterline Sensors Services Americas, Inc. |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|BVR Technologies Co.                      |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|CMC Electronics Incorporated              |  | Canada    
|CMC Electronics Aurora Incorporated       |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|Darchem Engineering Ltd.                  |  | Scotland  
|                                          | 
|Hytek Finishes Co.                        |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|Kirkhill  TA Co.                         |  | California
|                                          | 
|Korry Electronics Co.                     |  | Delaware  
|AVISTA Incorporated                       |  | Wisconsin 
|Palomar Products, Inc.                    |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|Leach International Corporation           |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|Leach International Europe S.A.           |  | France    
|                                          | 
|Mason Electric Co.                        |  | Delaware  
|                                          | 
|Muirhead Aerospace Limited                |  | England   
|                                          | 
|Weston Aerospace Ltd.                     |  | England   
|Norwich Aero Products Ltd.                |  | New York  
|Pressure Systems, Inc.                    |  | Virginia  

The above list excludes certain subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not
constitute a significant subsidiary as of October 26, 2007.
No. 11-5571.

#### Teresa Polite, Petitioner v. Arkansas Department of Correction.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 329,

181 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6216,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36910-36911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the

[[Page 36911]]

assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of 
a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking 
companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies 
listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 31, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. First American Corporation, Nashville, Tennessee; to merge with 
CSB Financial Corporation, Ashland City, Tennessee, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Cheatham State Bank, Kingston Springs, Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 2, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18092 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38824-38825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-131-007, GT98-23-001 and RP98-184-001]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1-A the following revised tariff sheets, to be effective as 
shown below:

[[Page 38825]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Substitute revised tariff sheets              Effective date        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 1....  November 1, 1997.             
Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 1...  April 1, 1998.                
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 30...  November 1, 1997.             
Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 30...  April 1, 1998.                
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 34A..  November 1, 1997.             
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 34A.  May 8, 1998.                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overthrust states that the filing is being made in response to the 
Commission's June 22, 1998 letter in Docket No. RP97-301-002.
    Overthrust states that this tariff filing (1) incorporates into 
certain tariff sheets filed by Overthrust in Docket Nos. RP97-131-005, 
GT98-23-000 and RP98-184-000 tariff revisions that were approved by the 
Commission's June 22 letter order, and (2) corrects the pagination of 
tariff sheets tendered with this filing that became effective between 
November 1, 1997, and May 8, 1998.
    Overthrust states further that a copy of this filing has been 
served upon its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah and 
the Public Service Commission of Wyoming.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should be a protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19192 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1675

___________ Mark Anthony Gladney, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Hilton Frontenac Hotel, * District Court for the Eastern St. Louis Hotel, * District of Missouri. * Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Phyllis Kennedy, Human Resources * Director; Tom Barton, Chef; Dennis * Shelton, General Manager, * * Defendants. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2004 Filed: December 10, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.* The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- Mark Anthony Gladney appeals the district court’s * adverse grant of summaryjudgment in favor of Hilton Frontenac Hotel and dismissing Gladney’s employmentdiscrimination and retaliation action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
ncasi

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT, INC.

P.O. Box 13318, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318

Phone (919) 941-6400 | Fax (919) 941-6401

 Vipin K. Varma, PhD

 (352) 331-1745 | (904) 891-5021

 vvarma@ncasi.org

February 15, 2012 

TO: Robin Dunkins, Sector Policies and Programs Division, OAQPS 

FROM: Vipin Varma and John Pinkerton 

Dear Ms Robin Dunkins,

In the December 27, 2011 Federal Register Residual Risk and Technology Review proposal for the Pulp and Paper 

industry, EPA requested comments on whether to remove or modify excess emissions allowances for Low Volume 

High Concentration, High Volume Low Concentration, and steam strippers (see FR 76 p. 81346). Specifically, EPA 

has requested information on the following:

1. Circumstances for excess emissions and whether they qualify as Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) 

events (and if not, why not)

2. General categorization of excess emissions events (and causes)

3. Differentiating between routine excess emissions events and SSM events

4. Frequency and duration of occurrences and, if available, quantities of emissions

5. Compilation of prevalent monitoring procedures and work practices, and

6. Whether excess emission periods are needed for technology or operational reasons

The assembly of this kind of information, in the form of substantive comments reflecting industry-wide practices, is 

a complex endeavor and cannot be accomplished by February 27 – the end of the comment period. NCASI is 

currently designing a targeted survey, working with AF&PA and the industry, that attempts to address EPA’s 

questions and information needs. NCASI has a strong track record of conducting surveys around complex technical 

and regulatory issues and providing thorough reviews of the same. This survey will attempt to provide relevant 

information on categories of “routine” releases that are operational or process driven and not SSM events, their 

frequency, duration, and other related information. 

Comprehensive industry responses and subsequent assimilation of all data is time consuming, especially 

considering other ongoing projects and research. Therefore, we request that EPA extend the timeline for 

comments pertaining to excess emission allowances by four months until June 27th. This extension will enable a 

more comprehensive and deliberate data collection process and more substantive and responsive comments.
The idea of undertaking such a survey has been broached with member companies and they are willing to respond 

to this survey later this spring. I have copied some of our member companies on this e-mail with whom we will be 

working to acquire this additional information. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Best Regards

Vipin

Vipin K. Varma, PhD

NCASI Inc.

(352) 331 1745 x 260

(904) 891 5021

vvarma@ncasi.org
No. 11-5998.

#### Jevon Raynard Nicholson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 360,

181 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7080.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 228.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 19

                     [LETTERHEAD OF DANNIBLE & MCKEE, LLP]


                                                          September 10, 2002

                                                          Private & Confidential

Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
140 Cortland Avenue
Syracuse, New York 13221

Gentlemen:

         We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your
Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

         We have read management's justification for the change in accounting
for the cost of merchandise replaced due to loss and abuse contained in the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2002. Based on our reading of
the data and discussions with Company officials about the business judgment and
business planning factors relating to the change, we believe management's
justification to be reasonable. Accordingly (in reliance on management's
determination as regards elements of business judgment and business planning),
we concur that the newly adopted accounting principle described above is
preferable in the Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.

         We have not audited any financial statements of Coyne International
Enterprises Corp. and subsidiaries subsequent to October 31, 2001, nor have we
audited the application of the change in accounting principle disclosed in Form
10-Q of Coyne International Enterprises Corp. and subsidiaries for the three
months ended July 31, 2002; accordingly, our comments are subject to revision on
completion of an audit of the financial statements that include the accounting
change.

                                                          Dannible & McKee, LLP
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the the Form 10-K), I, Robert D.
George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 23, 2008



By:

/s/ Robert D. GeorgeRobert D. GeorgeVice President, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer