alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

 Commander Sean R. Moody

Supply Corps, United States Navy

Commander

Navy Cmdr. Sean R. Moody, a native of Lake Arrowhead, California, took 

command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 

June 17, 2022. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics for Business Management from Occidental College in 2003 and received his commission through Naval Officer Candidate School in 2004. He holds a Master 

of Business Administration Degree from the University of Pennsylvania’s 

Wharton School.

Afloat, he served as supply officer onboard MCM CREW SWERVE, which 

during his tour, he rotated between USS DEXTEROUS (MCM 13) in Manama, Bahrain and USS DEFENDER (MCM 2) in Ingleside, Texas. He also 

served as general stores officer (S8) and aviation stores officer (S6) onboard USS MAKIN ISLAND (LHD 8) 

during the ship’s maiden deployment.

Ashore, he served on the Commandant’s Staff of the U.S. Naval Academy, the Joint Logistics Staff of Combined 

Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa, the afloat policy staff of commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific, as aide to the 

commander of Naval Supply Systems Command and 47th Chief of Supply Corps; as secretary of the Navy Tours 

with Industry Fellow at Apple, Inc., as support equipment director on the Aviation Operations Staff of NAVSUP 

Weapon Systems Support, Philadelphia and as deputy chief of Logistics Plans at Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet.

Moody is a qualified Naval Aviation supply officer, Surface Warfare supply corps officer and acquisition 

professional. He is entitled to wear the Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, 

Navy Commendation Medals and various other personal, unit and service awards.
No. 11-5468.

#### Araceli Almanzar, aka Araceli E. Almanzar, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 316,

181 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5783.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1214.
Item 

Number Description of Item Model Number

1 65 T Rough Terrain 

Crane RTC-806511

2 75 T Rough Terrain 

Crane 75RT

3 85 T Rough Terrain 

Crane 85RT

4 100 T Rough Terrain 

Crane 100RT

5 110 T Rough Terrain 

Crane RTC-8011011

6 120 T Rough Terrain 

Crane 120RT

7 130 T Rough Terrain 

Crane RTC-8013011

8 160 T Rough Terrain 

Crane RTC-8016011

9 65 T Hyd. Truck Crane 65HT

10 75 T Hyd. Truck Crane HTC-867511

11 75 T Hyd. Truck Terrain 

Crane HTT-867511

12 100 T Hyd. Truck Crane HTC-86100

13 100 T Hyd. Truck Terrain 

Crane HTT-86100

14 110 T Hyd. Truck Crane HTC-86110

15 110 T Hyd. Truck Terrain 

Crane HTT-86110

16 120 T Hyd. Truck Crane 120HT

17 175 T Hyd. All Terrain 

Crane 175AT

18 210 T Hyd. All Terrain 

Crane 210AT

19 275 Hyd. All Terrain 

Crane 275AT

20 55 T Tele-Boom Crawler 

Crane TCC-550

21 80 T Tele-Boom Crawler 

Crane TCC-800

22 120 T Tele-Boom Crawler 

Crane TCC-1200

23 Crawler Crane 140 T Tele

Boom TCC-1400

24 250 T Tele-Boom Crawler 

Crane TCC-2500
Item 

Number Description of Item Model Number

25 80 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 138HSL

26 110 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 218HSL

27 130 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 228HSL

28 150 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 238HSL

29 200 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 248HSL

30 250 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 298 Series 

31 300 T Lattice Boom 

Crawler Crane 348 Series 2
No. 11-6024.

#### Roger Yeadon, Jr., Petitioner v. Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

565 U.S. 953, 132 S. Ct. 424,

181 L. Ed. 2d 276,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7322.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 627.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8202

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RONALD WAYNE LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00104-JRS-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Christopher Nunnally, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence in his criminal trial. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Lewis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See

United States v. North Am. Coal Exch. , 676 F.2d 99, 100 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we deny Lewis’ motions for appointment of counsel and for release on bail pending appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3185 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Defense Language 

Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself, Mr. CROW, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

KIM, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. CISNEROS, and Mr. PRICE of North 

Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Defense Language Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts 

degree in a foreign language, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Language Im5 provement Act’’ or the ‘‘DLI Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3185 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LAN2 GUAGE CENTER. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY TO AWARD BACHELOR’S DE4 GREES.—Section 2168 of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Asso7 ciate’’ and inserting ‘‘Associate or Bachelor’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of 

12 the Defense Language Institute may confer— 

13 ‘‘(1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign 

14 language upon any graduate of the Foreign Lan15 guage Center of the Institute who fulfills the re16 quirements for that degree; or 

17 ‘‘(2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign lan18 guage upon any graduate of the Foreign Language 

19 Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements 

20 for that degree.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 108 of title 10, United States 

23 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

24 2168 and inserting the following new item: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3185 IH

‘‘2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5405.

#### Michael Lane, Petitioner v. John Doe, et al.

565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 307,

181 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5882.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 399 Fed. Appx. 964.
No. 10-10799.

#### Janet L. Mora, Petitioner v. Mary Lattimore, Warden.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 174,

181 L. Ed. 2d 85,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6031.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 975.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3238 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with voting 

systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. RATCLIFFE (for himself, Mr. HIMES, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. 

KHANNA, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CLINE, and Mr. COOPER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with voting systems under the Computer Fraud 

and Abuse Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending the Integ5 rity of Voting Systems Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING 

7 SYSTEMS. 

8 Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3238 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

3 at the end; 

4 (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘or’’ 

5 at the end; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(C) that— 

8 ‘‘(i) is part of a voting system; and 

9 ‘‘(ii)(I) is used for the management, 

10 support, or administration of a Federal 

11 election; or 

12 ‘‘(II) has moved in or otherwise af13 fects interstate or foreign commerce;’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

15 end; 

16 (3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period 

17 and inserting a semicolon; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(13) the term ‘Federal election’ means any 

20 election (as defined in section 301(1) of the Federal 

21 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 

22 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined in section 

23 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

24 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(3))); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3238 IH

1 ‘‘(14) the term ‘voting system’ has the meaning 

2 given the term in section 301(b) of the Help Amer3 ica Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081(b)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19617]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on July 29, 1998, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    Portion open to the public:
    (1) Proposed responses to letters to the President proposing an 
amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act to permit employees to retire 
with an unreduced annuity under the RRA at age 55 after 30 years of 
service, whichever comes first.
    (2) Employee Suggestion 1448 (Addition of agency's website address 
to letterhead stationary).
    (3) Coverage Determinations:
    A. Railroad Ventures, Inc.
    B. Decision on Reconsideration--Huron Transportation Group, Huron 
Development and Construction, RailAmerica Services Corporation.
    (4) Revised Form HA-1. Appeal under the Railroad Retirement Act or 
Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.
    (5) Year 2000 Issues.
    Portion closed to the public:
    (A) Request to Establish a Permanent Lead Specialist in the 
Staffing Section of the Bureau of Personnel.
    (B) Request to Establish a GS-13 Auditor Position and Abolish a GS-
12/11/09/07 Auditor Position in the Audit and Compliance Section.
    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19617 Filed 7-20-98; 11:11 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

Improving Camo Utility 

Uniforms: Shade & 

Standardization 

Leighann Mazoki

November 16th, 2017
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

What items am I referring to?

• Combat Utility Uniforms that the BDU 

Team Procures:

– Afghan Army

– Afghan Police

– Air Force

– Army

– Coast Guard

– Marine Corps.

– Navy
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

What has been done to improve shade?

Traveled to both greige manufacturers

Traveled to Fabric printers to perform on the spot 

shade evaluation

Benefits

Programs

Provided the LAB readings for camo colors of the 

standards and tolerances
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

What else can we do to improve 

shade?

• Possible Solutions

– Provide pieces of tolerances to the mills?

• Pilot Program??? –Air Force Tiger Stripe-NYCO

– How often do we go to the mill?

– Lots that are waived, mills request as 

tolerances?

– Allow fabric to be submitted under a reference 

contract number than transferred to a prime 

contractor at a later date.

– Any other suggestion?
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

What has been done to standardize 

manufacturing?

• Army and Air Force now have a similar 

maternity specification

• Air Force has moved back to the rip stop 

fabric from twill

• Air Force and Army Patrol cap are moving 

to the same visor.

• Vendors come in with Engineering Change 

Proposal/VECP’s
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

What other improvements are out there 

to standardize manufacturing?

• Collars?

• Cuffs?

• Greige weight?

• Pockets?
Deliver the right solution on time, every time

WARFIGHTER FIRST - PEOPLE & CULTURE - STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT - FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP - PROCESS EXCELLENCE

Points of Contact

Acquisition Team

Leighann Mazoki, IST Chief, X5608

ACU ProgramKO-Andrew and Leighann

Andrew Chmielewski-X2437

Mark McClernan-X5828

ALL HeadwearMonica McGarvey-2862

RABU ProgramEvan Eisenberg KO \ Buyer-X0308

ODU Program

KO Leighann Mazoki

Michael Baron-X3052

MCCUU ProgramKO-Leighann Mazoki X5608

Mark McClernan-X5828

NWU ProgramKO-Evan Eisenberg

Joe Parker-X5621

Afghan Program

KO Leighann Mazoki

Michael Baron-X3052
Real People, Real Stories

In March 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) launched the first-ever paid national 

tobacco education campaign—Tips From Former Smokers 

(Tips). 

The Tips campaign profiles real people—not actors—who 

live with serious long-term health effects from smoking and 

exposure to secondhand smoke. Over the first 2 years of 

the campaign, ads have shown people who’ve had stomas, 

lung removal, heart attacks, limb amputations, asthma, and 

diabetes complications. These individuals offer “tips” on 

how to get dressed when you have a stoma or an artificial 

limb. Their compelling stories send a powerful message: 

Quit smoking now—or better yet, don’t start. 

• These hard-hitting ads deliver results. An estimated 1.64

million Americans tried to quit smoking because of the

2012 Tips campaign, and at least 100,000 are expected

to quit smoking for good.

• The Tips campaign serves as an important counter to

cigarette marketing that exceeds $950,000 an hour—

more than $23 million a day—in the United States.

What Are the Key Messages of the 

Campaign?

• Smoking causes immediate damage to your body, which

can lead to long-term health problems. 

• For every smoking-related death, at least 30 Americans

live with a smoking-related illness. 

• Now is the time to quit smoking, and if you want help,

free assistance is available.

How Can I Use CDC’s Tips Campaign 

Resources to Help My Patients Quit? 

• Explain how patients’ health conditions can be linked

to smoking. Use the Tips campaign participants as 

examples. You can get to know them and hear their 

personal stories at CDC.gov/tips.

• Suggest that your patients visit the I’m Ready to Quit!

page of the Tips Web site. 

CDC’s National Tobacco Education Campaign

March 14, 2012 CDC’S NATIONAL TOBACCO EDUCATION CAMPAIGN

Why It Matters to Health Care Professionals

TIPS FROM

FORMER

SMOKERS

• Check out the CDC’s resources developed just for health

care professionals. These include printable posters for

your waiting room and patient rooms, FAQs about quitlines,

and a pocket card to help guide your conversations with

patients.

• Let your patients know that they can get free quit

help by calling 1-800-QUIT-NOW (1-800-784-8669) or

1-855-DÉJELO-YA (1-855-335-3569) (for Spanish speakers).

U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention

CDC.gov/tips

Explore and share the resources CDC has available at CDC.gov/tips.

And like CDC Tobacco Free on Facebook today to keep informed.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, Timothy R. Yost, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Corporate Executive Board Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 28, 2004 /s/ Timothy R. YostTimothy R. YostChief Financial Officer
No. 11-6474.

#### Earl D. Phiffer, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 526,

181 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7801.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV, denied.

Same case below, 323 Wis. 2d 822, 781 N.W.2d 550.
No. 11-236.

#### James Wilbur Fondren, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 256,

181 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5365.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 327.
No. 10-10995.

#### Solomon Tekle, Petitioner v. United States (two judgments).

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 199,

181 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6084.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
TABLE 1. Percentage of students in middle school (grades 6-8) who were current users* of any tobacc

type, sex, and race/ethnicity 

―National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2002 and 2004 

Any tobacco† Cigarettes Cigars Smokeless tobacco Pipes 

Characteristic % (95% CI§) % (95% CI§) % (95% CI§) % (95% CI§) % (95% CI§) % Middle school, 2004 Sex 

Male Female

Race/Ethnicity 

12.7 

10.9 

(±1.5) 

(±1.4)

7.9¶ 

8.8 

(±1.2)

(±1.4)

6.7 

3.8

(±0.9)

(±0.6)

3.8 

1.9

(±0.8)

(±0.4)

3.5¶ 

1.9 

(±0.7)

(±0.4)

3.0 

1.8

White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic HispanicAsian 

Total

11.3 

12.4 

15.1

5.1 

11.8 

(±1.6) 

(±2.2) 

(±2.1)

(±2.3)

(±1.3)

8.5 

7.6 

9.9 

2.7¶ 

8.4 

(±1.5) 

(±1.7) 

(±1.5)

(±1.7) 

(±1.1)

4.4 

6.9 

8.2¶ 

1.2¶ 

5.3 

(±0.7)

(±1.7)

(±1.3)

(±1.1) 

(±0.7)

3.0 

2.0 3.8 

1.0 

2.8 

(±0.7)

(±0.8)

(±0.9)

(±0.7)

(±0.5)

2.3 

2.2¶ 

5.3 

1.5¶ 

2.7¶

(±0.6)

(±0.7)

(±1.2)

(±1.2) 

(±0.5)

1.9 

2.9 

4.3¶ 

1.1 

2.4 

Middle school, 2002 Sex 

Male

Female

Race/Ethnicity 

14.7 

11.7 

(±1.6)

(±1.4)

9.8 

9.7 

(±1.3)

(±1.4)

7.9 

4.1

(±1.1)

(±0.7)

5.3 

1.6

(±1.3)

(±0.5)

5.1 

1.9 

(±0.8)

(±0.4)

3.1 

1.7

White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic HispanicAsian 

Total

13.2 

13.5 

12.5 

8.6 

13.3 

(±1.9) 

(±2.4) 

(±1.9)

(±3.3)

(±1.4)

10.1 

9.0 

8.7 

7.4 

9.8 

(±1.6) 

(±2.3) 

(±1.5)

(±3.3)

(±1.2)

5.5 

7.3 

6.3 

5.0 

6.0 

(±1.0)

(±1.7)

(±1.1)

(±2.8)

(±0.7)

3.8 2.3 

2.7 

3.5 

3.5 

(±1.1)(±0.9)

(±0.7)

(±2.7)

(±0.7)

2.8 3.9 

4.3 

4.6 3.5 

(±0.6)(±1.4)

(±0.9)

(±2.7)

(±0.5)

1.8 3.1 

2.9 

3.1 2.4 

* Used tobacco on at least 1 day during the 30 days preceding the survey. † Cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, pipes, bidis (leaf-wrapped, flavored cigarettes from India), or kreteks (clove cigarettes).§ Confidence interval. ¶ Significant difference (p<0.05), 2004 versus 2002
No. 11-6171.

#### Ronald E. Mitchell, Petitioner v. Missouri.

565 U.S. 986, 132 S. Ct. 516,

181 L. Ed. 2d 363,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7849.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 337 S.W.3d 68.