alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 02, 2023 DLA-SM-24-3241

DLA - Strategic Materials Announces

Ferromanganese Awards 

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – The Defense Logistics Agency - Strategic Materials 

announced today that 9,000 ST of high carbon ferromanganese has been 

awarded under DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 (Negotiated) Amendment 

No. 001 (FY 24 Ferromanganese). The awards have a total provisional value 

of $6.5M. 

The material was awarded to the following companies: 

- ProFound Alloys, LLC

- CCMA, LLC

For additional information please visit our website

https://www.dla.mil/Strategic-Materials/Announcements/ or contact DLA 

Strategic Materials Directorate of Strategic Planning and Market Research at 

DLAStrategicMaterials@dla.mil.
# Methods and Key Questions

# Literature - Scabies

# Literature - Pubic Lice

# Abbreviations and Acronyms
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00350-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.G., a Child

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-00823

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

The motion to withdraw as counsel is DENIED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against 

Appellant in relation to this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED September 19, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and




---



##### 



b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 May 25, 2007
    
    /s/
    
    Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher P. Westad, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Able Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005



           /S/ Christopher P. Westad
------------------------------------------------
             Christopher P. Westad
        Interim Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 10-7614.

#### Clara Brown, Petitioner v. E. L. Sparkman, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 953,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 296.

178 L. Ed. 2d 786,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 208.
# C_2014061EN.01001201.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/12

---

Action brought on 12 December 2013 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Diseños Mireia (D and M)

(Case T-662/13)

2014/C 61/21

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky and C. Mellein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Diseños Mireia, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and cancel the contested trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and cancel the contested trade mark;

| — | Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and remit the case; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and remit the case;

| — | Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1. |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark consisting of the letters ‘D’ and ‘M’ for goods in Class 14 — Community trade mark application No 9 737 917

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The Community trade mark registration No 3 984 044 for the word mark ‘dm’ for goods in Class 14

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---
### Exhibit 32.2

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia L. Hedrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ Cynthia L. Hedrick 
|-----------------------
|Cynthia L. Hedrick     
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 16, 2004
March 8, 2022 DLA-SM-22-3210

DLA - Strategic Materials Announces 

Zinc Award

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – FORT BELVOIR, Va. – The Defense Logistics Agency - 

Strategic Materials announced today that approximately 400 Short Tons of Zinc

(High Grade, Prime Western, Mixed Miscellaneous Drummed) has been awarded 

under DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 (Negotiated) Amendment No. 001 (FY 2022 Zinc). 

The sole award has a total provisional value of approximately $1.32 M*.

For additional information please visit our website

www.dla.mil/hq/acquisition/strategicmaterials or contact DLA Strategic 

Materials Directorate of Strategic Planning and Market Research at 

DLAStrategicMaterials@dla.mil. 

*If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
Updated 2/22/2022

**PUB LOG Extract Source**

**MOE_Rule.zip**

**V_MOE_RULE.CSV  (17 million + rows)**

Field NameColumnLengthDRN                                                                      “NIIN”,19NCB_CD_4130 + I_I_NBR_4131“MOE_RL”,24MOE_RULE_NBR_8290“MOE_CD”,32MOE_CD_2833“AMC”,41AMC_2871“AMSC”,51AMSC_2876“NIMSC”,61NIMSC_0076“DT_ASGND”,79DT_MR_ASGND_9128“IMC”,81IMC_2744“IMCA”,92IMC_ACTY_2748“AAC”,101AAC_2507“PICA”,112PICA_2866“PICA_LOA”,122PICA_LOA_3505“SICA”,132SICA_2938“SICA_LOA”,142SICA_LOA_9547“SUBMTR”,152AUTH_II_SUBMR_2535“AUTH_COLLAB”,1614VAUTH_II_COLBR_2531“SUPP_COLLAB”,1726VSUPPLM_COLLBR_2533“AUTH_RCVR”,1814VAUTH_II_RCVR_2532“SUPP_RCVR”,1923VSUPPLM_RCVR_2534“DSOR”,2011VDSOR_0903“FMR_MOE_RL”214FMR_MOE_RULE_8280
D

Appendix D

Appendix D-14

Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) 

The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) is a Federal program that provides benefits for 

serious injuries that occur as a result of the administration or use of a covered countermeasure. Countermeasures

are vaccines, antivirals, drugs, biologics, or medical devices used to diagnose, prevent, or treat, a declared 

pandemic, epidemic, or security threat. The Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human

Services (the Secretary) declares specific countermeasures under CICP

This Program was established by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 (PREP Act), 

42 U.S.C. § 247d-6e. The PREP Act also confers broad liability protections covering the manufacture, testi

development, distribution, or use of the designated covered countermeasure

Some examples of covered public health threats are:

y COVID-19

y Ebola

y Pandemic Influenza A

y Smallpox

y Anthrax.

Who is eligible? 

The following may be eligible:

y The injured countermeasure recipient

y Certain survivor(s) of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient

y The estate of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient

How can a claim be filed?

Individuals have one year from the date the vaccine or other covered countermeasure was administered or used 

to request compensation benefits. If their injury is added to a Countermeasures Injury Table, then they may

also have one year from the effective date of the Table addition to file. To file a claim, individuals must submit

a Request for Benefits Form and the Authorization for Use or Disclosure of Health Information Form to request 

medical records from each health care provider who treated the injured person. In addition, medical records from

one year before the injury to the present time must be submitted

For more detailed instructions, visit the CICP website at https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/filing-benefi

Eligible individuals may be compensated for certain reasonable and necessary medical expenses and for lost 

employment income at the time of the injury. Death benefits may be paid to certain survivors of covered

countermeasures recipients who have died as a direct result of the covered countermeasure injury. The U

Department of Health and Human Services is the payer of last resort. Therefore, payments are reduced by those

of other third-party payers

Contact Information 

Website: http://www.hrsa.gov/cic

E-mail: CICP@hrsa.go

Phone: 1-855-266-CICP (2427) Updated January 2021
No. 10-10966.

#### Ricardo Cardenas, Petitioner v. San Antonio Police Department, et al.

565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 196,

181 L. Ed. 2d 102,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6324.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 401.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    551,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               563,209
<PP&E>                                         231,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          825,952
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,014
<OTHER-SE>                                     352,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   570,541
<SALES>                                        367,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,859
<CGS>                                          494,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  494,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (152,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (152,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (152,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT NO. 3 
TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This amendment
(the “Amendment”) is made as of and effective this 30th day of May 2014, between CalAmp
Corp. (the “Company”) and Richard Vitelle (“Executive”).

RECITALS:

     A. The Company and Executive are parties
to that certain Employment Agreement originally dated as of May 31, 2002 and as
previously amended on December 19, 2008 and June 12, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”),
pursuant to which Executive is employed by the Company.

     B. The Company and Executive desire to
amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and of the respective covenants and agreements set forth below, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

		1.		In accordance
      Section 1(e) and Section 9(f) of the Employment Agreement,
      the Employment Agreement is hereby further amended by this Amendment to
      extend the term for a period of two years, through May 30,
      2016.
		  
		2.		Except as otherwise
      amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect.
		 
	     	3.	    	Original signatures
      transmitted and received via facsimile or other electronic transmission of
      a scanned document, (e.g., .pdf or similar format) are true and valid
      signatures for all purposes hereunder and shall bind the parties to the
      same extent as that of an original signature. This Amendment may be
      executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to
      constitute an original but all of which together shall constitute only one
      document.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above
have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


	/s/ Richard Vitelle	
	Richard
      Vitelle	 
	 		
	CALAMP
      CORP.	
	 		
	/s/ Michael Burdiek	
	By:  	Michael Burdiek	
		President & CEO
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA

- 20 15

- 3741 Directorate ID : 2014

- SW

- 040

- AD

Helicopter Model:

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 40 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the 9

- degree frame to prevent loss of structural integrity and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs :

 Inspecting the 9

- degree frame requires 3 work

- hours per inspection for a cost of $255

per helicopter and $10,200 for the fleet per inspection cycle.

 Repairing the 9

- degree frame requires 24 work

- hours for a labor cost of $2,040. Parts

cost $3,350 for a total cost of $5,390 per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant re gulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Ye s ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : Robert Grant
Chromium Metal Offering

Item # Location Drums Origin

Unit of Measure................... Pounds Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

October 26, 2022

October 27, 2022

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2023

Basic Ordering Agreement... Chromium Metal Date of Posting...................

Commodity.................................Chromium Metal Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Type Lot #

Totals

Net Weight ST

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

*

All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

112.31 ST 224,618 Lbs

Quantity Offered/Minimum Bid

0260b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 006 45 HOLLAND 10.17 ST 20336 LBs 

0267a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 012B 36 GERMANY 8.14 ST 16276 LBs 

0267b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 012B 35 GERMANY 7.91 ST 15814 LBs 

0267c Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 012B 35 GERMANY 7.91 ST 15818 LBs 

0269a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 013B 40 HOLLAND 9.063 ST 18126.8 LBs 

0269b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 013B 40 HOLLAND 9.063 ST 18126.8 LBs 

0334a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0334b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 6 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0335a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0335b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs 

0335c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs

0335d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs
No. 10-11128.

#### Daniel Lee Hall, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 218,

181 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6620.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5232.

#### Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 385,

181 L. Ed. 2d 242,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6511,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.