alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009     
|                       
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated February 25, 2008accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of SFAS 123R: “Share Based Payment”, effective January 1, 2006,and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Annual Report of Federal Realty Investment Trust on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Federal Realty Investment Trust on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-100819, File No. 333-84210, File No. 333-97945, File No. 333-63619, File No. 033-63687, File No. 033-63955, FileNo. 33-15264, File No. 333-142231, File No. 333-120498, File No. 333-124195, File No. 333-125467 and File No. 333-135159) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-60364, File No. 333-63617, File No. 333-147080 and File No. 333-147081). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

McLean, Virginia

February 25, 2008
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.43-1 APPENDIX 8.43

AP8.43. APPENDIX 8.43

FOLLOW-UP FOR INVENTORY CONTROL

POINT/INTEGRATED MATERIEL MANAGER

MATERIEL RECEIPT STATUS

(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)

FIELD LEGEND

TYPE FOLLOW-UP

ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

(MANUAL)

BLOCK 

NO.

(MECHANICAL)

RECORD

POSITION(S)

Send To A Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address corresponding to 

the routing identifier code (RIC).

Followup is From B Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address of the reporting 

activity.

Document Identifier

Code

1 1-3 Enter DIC FTT.

Other Fields 2-23 4-80 Enter the data as contained in the 

materiel shipment status (DIC FTM).

Remarks Field L-V Not Applicable This field shall be used to convey 

any additionally required information 

not provided for in the followup 

format.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5954-2]


Continuing Planning Process for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability for public review and comment of the 
continuing planning process (CPP) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Clean Water Act (the Act) at section 303(e), and EPA's 
implementing regulation at 40 CFR 130.5, requires that each State shall 
establish and maintain a continuing planning process (CPP) consistent 
with the Act. Each State is responsible for managing its water quality 
program to implement the processes specified in the CPP, and EPA is 
responsible for periodically reviewing the adequacy of the State's CPP.
    Pennsylvania developed and submitted a CPP in 1977. EPA 
subsequently approved that CPP. This notice is being published in 
accordance with Paragraph 18 of the consent decree in the matter of 
American Littoral Society and Public Interest Research Group of 
Pennsylvania v. EPA, Civil Docket No. 96-489. Consistent with the 
consent decree, EPA is publishing this notice of availability of the 
CPP to interested parties. By June 1, 1998, EPA will prepare and make 
available to interested parties for their review and comment its 
preliminary written summary of its review of the CPP. Copies of the CPP 
are available by contacting the person listed in the following FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Once available, copies of EPA's 
preliminary written summary may also be requested.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah B. Blackman, Office of 
Watersheds, at (215) 566-5720, or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debcb2bfbdb5b3bfb0f0adbfacbfb69ebbaebfb3bfb7b2f0bbaebff0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="086a64696b63656966267b697a6960486d786965696164266d7869266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.
Robert J. Mitkus,
Deputy Director, Water Protection Division, EPA Region III.
[FR Doc. 98-1914 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Andrew P. Blocher, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the
Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report).
The undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |        |  |                                                             
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |        |  | /s/    Andrew P.
Blocher                                    
|February 17, 2010 |  | NAME:  |  | Andrew P. Blocher                                           
|                  |  | TITLE: |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                  |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 09-5949.

#### Roberto E. Pulido, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1078, 131 S. Ct. 632,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9060.

178 L. Ed. 2d 508,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 566 F.3d 52.
No. 11-5464.

#### David Combs, Petitioner v. Gary Swarthout, Warden.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 315,

181 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5842.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32





      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 06 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
               (SUBSECTION (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                        OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)





     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of DuraVest, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company"), does certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that: (1) the 10-QSB
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-QSB
Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of the Company.



                               DURAVEST, INC.

Dated:  May 16, 2005           By:  /s/ Patti Cooke
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Patti Cooke, President, Principal Executive,
                                  Financial  and Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19032]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


FCC Renews EAS National Advisory Committee Charter

July 10, 1998.
    In accordance with GSA Final Rule on Federal advisory committee 
management, 41 CFR 101-6.1015, the Federal Communications Commission 
(FCC) is giving official notice of the renewal of the Emergency Alert 
System National Advisory Committee (NAC). The term of this advisory 
committee runs from July 25, 1998 to July 25, 2000.
    The Committee advises the FCC on all matters concerning the 
Emergency Alert System (EAS) and its implementation including, but not 
limited to, emergency alerting policies, technologies, plans, 
regulations, and procedures at the national, state and local levels. 
The Committee also recommends and develops training and education 
regarding the EAS and coordinates with state and local officials to 
assist in establishing and maintaining effective emergency alerting 
programs. The Committee, in general, interfaces, coordinates, and 
exchanges information with the public, industry, and various levels of 
government concerning the EAS.
    For additional information, contact Bonnie Gay at (202) 418-1228.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19032 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
### SERVED : MA Y 28 , 201 0
U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
APPLICATIO NO F GAR Y J
. LE E Fo r fee s an dexpense s unde r th e Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Ac t EAJA-SW-000 1 FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 8 FDM S NO
. FAA-2010-053 6 •'DnoT.'>T!0»- ! rijiil/iliOi i

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G
Thi s proceedin g (arisin g fromcivi l penalt y proceedin g FA A Docke t No
. CP10SW0013 ) ha s bee nassigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. Al l future pleading s an d othe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List
. 

# <i^ ^

Lonnie A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e L

a Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFAA Docke t No
. CP10SW000 8 (Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Act ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Ale x F
. Pevzner , Esq. , Applicant' s Counse l Alexande r

Anoli k A Professional La w Corporatio n 210 7 VanNes s Ave. , Suit e 20 0 Sa nFrancisco , C A 94109-257 2 TEL : 415-673-333 3 FAX : 415-673-354 8 Stellamari s Williams , Agency' s Counse l Safet y Enforcemen t

Branc h Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 Meacha mBlvd. , 6- E For t Worth , T X 76137-000 7 TEL : 817-222-508 1 FAX : 817-222-509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l AviationAdministration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chiefexecutive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-11077.

#### Ricardo Avila-Torres, aka Richard Avila, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 211,

181 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6618.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.48-1 APPENDIX 3.48

AP3.48. APPENDIX 3.48

SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT SUBSTITUTE 

ITEM REJECTION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DYH.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point to 

which this transaction is being forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item required.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity 25-29 Perpetuate from Special Program 

Requirement (SPR) Status.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Suffix 44 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Multiuse 51-56 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Project 57-79 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Coast Designation 60 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Blank 61 Leave blank.

Date Indicator 

(Support)

62-64 Perpetuate from SPR Request/Modifier.

Advice 65-66 Perpetuate from SPR Request.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the activity submitting the 

rejection transaction.

Purpose 70 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Supply Condition 71 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which transaction is prepared.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.48-2 APPENDIX 3.48

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Generic Submission 76 Perpetuate from SPR Status.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank.
No. 11-5577.

#### Jimmie Estes Thompson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 330,

181 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6116.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 695.
No. 11-146.

#### Relda Ann Moss, Petitioner v. Fairborn City Schools.

565 U.S. 883, 132 S. Ct. 254,

181 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5460.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40896

In The Matter Of: RESERVE PRODUCTION, INC

Debtor

_________________________________________________________________ WILLIAM T BILL CLARK, Representative of the Estate of Reserve Production, Inc

Appellee

v. LARRY SANDERS, Larry Sanders, Trustee

Appellant

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-MC-92)

_________________________________________________________________ September 5, 1996 Before KING, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Sanders filed a motion to withdraw the reference in an adversary proceeding pending in the bankruptcy court. On August 8, 1995, the district court granted the motion to withdraw the reference for the purposes of jury selection and jury trial, but2

kept the reference intact for all pretrial matters. The district court denied Sanders’s motion to reconsider its August 8, 1995 order. Courts of appeals have “uniformly construed a district court’s decision to withdraw a reference or to refuse such a withdrawal as interlocutory and non-reviewable.” In re Lieb , 915 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 1990) (citation, internal quotation marks, and brackets omitted). The denial of a motion for reconsideration of an otherwise non-appealable order is itself non-appealable. Branson v. City of Los Angeles , 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990). Finding that we have no appellate jurisdiction, we DISMISS this interlocutory appeal.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13855

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60480-JIC

HEATHER ANDREWS MCGEE,

LAKETHA D. WILSON,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(January 18, 2017)

Before MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS,

∗ District 

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

 ∗ Honorable Brian J. Davis, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting 

by designation.

Case: 15-13855 Date Filed: 01/18/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

The issue in this appeal is whether the extended charge that Bank of 

America assesses on its deposit accounts constitutes “interest” for purposes of the 

National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85–86. The plaintiffs concede that, under our 

decision in Video Trax, Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A., 205 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 2000), 

the extended charge is not interest. The plaintiffs brought this appeal because they 

want to petition the en banc Court to overrule Video Trax, a petition they are free 

to file within 21 days of our opinion, see 11th Cir. R. 35-2. The plaintiffs also 

argue that the district court should have allowed them to proceed to discovery 

before dismissing their complaint, but that argument fails because their complaint

fails to state a claim as a matter of law.

We AFFIRM the dismissal of the complaint. We DENY AS MOOT the 

appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal. 

Case: 15-13855 Date Filed: 01/18/2017 Page: 2 of 2
No. 11-5776.

#### Maurice Tirrell Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 346,

181 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6933.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 238.
# C_2014052EN.01003702.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/37

---

Action brought on 22 November 2013 — Reed Exhibitions v OHIM (INFOSECURITY)

(Case T-633/13)

2014/C 52/71

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reed Exhibitions Ltd (Richmond, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 1544/2012-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 1544/2012-5;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘INFOSECURITY’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 10 155 596

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partially rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Santa, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 13, 2009/s/ RICHARD A. SANTA Richard A. Santa Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Dynamic Materials Corporation


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Materials Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
No. 11-5331.

#### Donna Brown, Petitioner v. Cleveland Municipal School District, aka Cleveland Metropolitan School District, et al.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 298,

181 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5517,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.