alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Sun River  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting,  President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, President
Date: September 13, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18929]



[[Page 38450]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations

ACTION: Thereby determine that the objects on the list specified below, 
to be included in the exhibit, ``Van Gogh's Van Goghs: Masterpieces 
from the Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam,'' imported from abroad for the 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, in Washington, D.C., from on or about October 12, 1998, 
to on or about January 3, 1999, and at the Los Angeles County Museum of 
Art, Los Angeles, California, from on or about January 17, 1999, to on 
or about April 4, 1999, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 
(43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 
27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Caldwell, Assistant General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, 202/619-6982, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4Th Street, SW, Washington, 
D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-18929 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Order entered February 14, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00917-CR

ZANDRA TARNESA RUSHING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82667-2015

ORDER

On January 13, 2017, the reporter’s record was filed. After reviewing the record, it 

appeared that several exhibits were missing or had errors. We contacted court reporter Janet 

Dugger about the exhibits and, by January 23, 2017, all but one had been properly filed. To date, 

however, exhibit 93 has not been corrected.

We ORDER court reporter Janet Dugger to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this 

order, a corrected exhibit 93 that is text searchable, bookmarked, and indexed in proper format. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Talking to Pregnant Women

About Vaccines

When talking to women about vaccines during pregnancy, make a strong recommendation and 

allow time for them to ask questions. Hearing your answers can help women feel more confident 

about protecting themselves and their babies with Tdap and f lu vaccines.

Which vaccines do I need during pregnancy?

You need a whooping cough shot (also called Tdap) during 

the 3rd trimester of each pregnancy. You also need a f lu 

shot, which you can get during any trimester. If you are 

traveling internationally during your pregnancy, you may 

need additional vaccines.

Why do I need vaccines during pregnancy?

Changes in your heart, lungs and immune system during 

pregnancy make you more likely to get really sick if you get 

an illness like flu. Getting vaccinated during pregnancy can 

also give your baby some early protection.

Are these diseases really dangerous?

Yes. Even healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies 

can end up in the hospital if they catch the flu. Flu and 

whooping cough are also very dangerous for young 

babies, and can even be deadly.

Is it safe to get Tdap and flu vaccines 

while pregnant?

CDC and a panel of experts who make vaccine 

recommendations study these vaccines and have concluded 

that they are safe for pregnant women and their babies. These 

experts carefully reviewed the available safety data before 

recommending Tdap and f lu vaccines during pregnancy.

What are the side effects of vaccines 

given during pregnancy?

Most side effects from both f lu and Tdap vaccines are mild 

and include redness, swelling, pain, and tenderness where 

you got the shot. You may also feel tired, have body aches, 

or fever. Side effects usually get better on their own in a 

few days. 

Will the flu shot give me flu?

No, a flu shot cannot give you f lu. However, it can take up 

to 2 weeks for the vaccine to begin protecting you.

For this reason, we recommend getting a f lu shot by the 

end of October, before f lu season really gets going.

Can’t I just get vaccinated after my baby is born?

Babies do not get their f irst whooping cough shot until 

2 months of age, and they have to wait until they are 6 

months old to get a f lu shot. The vaccines you get during 

pregnancy will help protect your baby during their early 

months of life.

Isn’t it enough to make sure everyone 

around my baby is vaccinated?

It is important, but also sometimes difficult, to make sure 

that everyone around your baby is up to date on their 

vaccines. Your baby can still be exposed to diseases in 

public places too. Vaccines during pregnancy offer the best 

protection to your baby until they are old enough to get 

their own vaccines.

Won’t breastfeeding protect my baby from 

diseases until she gets her own vaccines?

Antibodies in breast milk give your baby some protection 

from f lu and whooping cough, but only if you get 

vaccinated during pregnancy. Breast milk only offers 

short-term protection, though, so it’s very important for 

your baby to start her own vaccines on time.

For more information, visit

cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy

Last updated DECEMBER 2019
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2283]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

July 9, 1998.

    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, NW., Washington, DC, or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed July 31, 1998. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must 
be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.
    Subject: Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Installment 
Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licenses 
(WT Docket No. 97-82).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 11.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18975 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7567

JAMES WILLIAM BERRY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, “Newly Appointed”;

JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner of Corrections;

MICHAEL COLEMAN, Deputy Warden; BETTY SLAYTON,

Magistrate of M.O.C.C.; CARL SHELLINGS, Unit

Manager; WILLIAM KINCAID, Unit Manager;

PETRISHA HENDSHEW, Postal Sup.; BRIAN STUMP,

Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL

SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-856)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

James William Berry, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Patrick

Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

James W. Berry, Sr., seeks to appeal from the district

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and

(1) denying Berry’s motion for a temporary restraining order or a

preliminary injunction, (2) granting the motion to dismiss filed by

Correctional Medical Services, and (3) granting in part the

remaining Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The district court denied

the motion to dismiss this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as to

Berry’s discrimination, retaliation, and Eighth Amendment claims.

We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000). Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Except

to the extent that Berry appeals from the denial of his motion for

a preliminary injunction, the order Berry seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction.

With respect to the appeal from the district court’s

denial of Berry’s motion for a preliminary injunction, we have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm this portion of the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Berry v. McBride, No. CA-02-856 (S.D.W. Va.

Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
- 4 -

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART;

DISMISSED IN PART
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-30512

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Garland D. Miller, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:07-CR-50032-1

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Garland D. Miller, former federal prisoner # 13658-035, appeals the 

district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his postjudgment motion 

challenging his 2008 restitution order. Miller also moves for the 

appointment of counsel and the recusal of the district judge. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 4, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-30512 Document: 00515767020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2021
No. 20-30512

2

By failing to challenge the district court’s decision that it lacked 

jurisdiction to modify Miller’s restitution order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3742, Miller has abandoned the issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff 

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Further, Miller articulates no basis 

for this court to grant relief. See Zimmerman v. Spears, 565 F.2d 310, 316 (5th 

Cir. 1977); see also In re McBryde, 117 F.3d 208, 220 (5th Cir. 1997); United 

States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978).

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.

Case: 20-30512 Document: 00515767020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2021
No. 11-5702.

#### Ricardo Mendez Contreras, Petitioner v. Kelly Harrington, Warden.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 342,

181 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7095.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10732.

#### Glenford Edward Ennis, Petitioner v. Dwight Neven, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 846, 132 S. Ct. 165,

181 L. Ed. 2d 78,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6129.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 794.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan IIIThomas L. Monahan IIIChief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2006
 /s/ Timothy R. YostTimothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2006
 24
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-64611 of Total-Tel USA Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated May 8, 1998, (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement of the
1997 financial statements) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Total-Tel USA Communications, Inc. for the year ended January 31,
1998, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the 
Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
May 15, 1998
August 07, 2023 DLA-SM-23-3236

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR July 2023

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during July 2023.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

NO

SALES

Ferromanganese Amendment 001 ST NO

SALES

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST NO

SALES

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001 Lbs W 215,097 $3.00 M *

Tin Amendment 001 MT NO

SALES

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                -----------------




  CERTIFICATION PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
               (SUBSECTION (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                        OF TITLE 18, UNITIED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Ac of 2002, subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of DuraVest, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the three months Ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that: (1) the 10-QSB Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-QSB Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of the Company.

                                 DURAVEST, INC.

Date:    May 8, 2003             By: /s/ Patti Cooke
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Patti Cooke, President and Principal
                                     Executive Financial and Accounting
                                     Officer
Exhibit 99.1
CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Reliability Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Edwards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Edwards
Larry Edwards
Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2003

34
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19310]



[[Page 38784]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-111, RM-9299]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Elko, NV

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by L. 
Topaz Enterprises, Inc., seeking the allotment of Channel 233C3 to 
Elko, NV, as the community's third local commercial FM service. Channel 
233C3 can be allotted to Elko in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction, at coordinates 40-49-48 North Longitude and 115-45-36 
West Latitude.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 31, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Dale A. 
Ganske, 5546-3 Century Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-111, adopted July 1, 
1998, and released July 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19310 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
No. 11-6261.

#### Eric Flores, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 554,

181 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7964.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K,
August 1, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                       1,403,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,589,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,404,453
<PP&E>                                      12,794,011
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,400,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,336,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,005,594
<BONDS>                                      5,094,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       810,208
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,336,229
<SALES>                                     37,559,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,559,411
<CGS>                                       22,846,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,291,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,073,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,152,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,804,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   632,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,436,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,436,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.05)
        

</TABLE>