alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF ULTIMATE PURCHASER OF KEROSENE FOR USE IN NONEXEMPT, 

NONCOMMERCIAL AVIATION

(To support vendor’s claim for credit or payment under section 6427(l)(4)(C)(ii) of the Internal 

Revenue Code.)

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

Name, Address, and Employer Identification Number of Ultimate Vendor

The undersigned ultimate purchaser (“Buyer”) hereby certifies the following under penalties of 

perjury:

A. The kerosene to which this certificate relates is purchased for a nonexempt use in 

noncommercial aviation.

B. This certificate applies to the following (complete as applicable):

1. If this is a single purchase certificate, check here _ and enter:

a. Invoice or delivery ticket number ________________________________________

b. Number of gallons ___________________________________________________

2. This is a certificate covering all purchases under a specified account or order number:

a. Effective date ____________________

b. Expiration date ___________________ (period not to exceed 1 year after effective date)

c. Buyer’s account number _______________________

■ Buyer will provide a new certificate to the vendor if any information in this certificate changes.

■ If Buyer uses the kerosene to which this certificate relates for a use other than the nontaxable 

use stated above, Buyer will be liable for tax.

■ Buyer understands that the fraudulent use of this certificate may subject Buyer and all parties 

making such fraudulent use of this certificate to a fine or imprisonment, or both, together with 

the costs of prosecution.

________________________________________________________________

Printed or typed name of person signing

________________________________________________________________

Title of person signing

_________________________________

Name of Buyer

__________________________________________

Employer Identification Number

____________________________________________________________

Address of Buyer

________________________________________________________________

Signature and date signed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-127, RM-9303]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Boulder, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Boulder 
Broadcasting Company proposing the allotment of Channel 299A to 
Boulder, Montana, as that community's first local broadcast service. 
The channel can be allotted to Boulder without a site restriction at 
coordinates 46-14-18 and 112-07-06. Canadian concurrence will be 
requested for this allotment.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before September 8, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 23, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Frank R. Jazzo, Andrew S. 
Kersting, Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C., 1300 N. Seventeenth 
Street, 11th Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-127, adopted July 8, 1998, 
and released July 17, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-19784 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 11-185.

#### Leon R. Koziol, Petitioner v. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District of New York.

565 U.S. 963, 132 S. Ct. 455,

181 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7455.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 16 N.Y.3d 853, 922 N.Y.S.2d 267, 947 N.E.2d 159.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Sun River  Energy,  Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Redgie
Green,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Accounting  Officer of the company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 18, 2009


/s/ Redgie Green
--------------------------------
Redgie Green,
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Accounting Officer
---

EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rene Hamouth, chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of MangaPets, Inc. (Registrant) certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(Report) of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: December 21st , 2006

/s/ Rene Hamouth
  Rene Hamouth
  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
No. 11-6308.

#### Ty Brock, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 441,

181 L. Ed. 2d 286,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7235.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 999.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     I, Roger S. Newton, Chief Executive Officer, of Esperion Therapeutics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

     (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form on 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *


  /s/ Roger S. Newton
---------------------------
Roger S. Newton,
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    November 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RRC
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP OF GEORGIA L.P.'S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001066253
<NAME>                                         RRC OPERATING PARTNERSHIP OF
                                               GEORGIA, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                    15,752
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             37,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                 5,623,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                           405,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         5,294,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             1,129,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           5,294,112
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         598,210
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            140,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          92,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       169,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          196,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      196,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             196,142
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.00



</TABLE>
No. 11-5707.

#### Jeffrey Sanders, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

565 U.S. 938, 132 S. Ct. 447,

181 L. Ed. 2d 251,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7230.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 653 F. Supp. 2d 715.
No. 10-11278.

#### Norman Garcia, Petitioner v. Fred Figueroa, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 238,

181 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6979.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 401 Fed. Appx. 369.
No. 11-5069.

#### Alvaro Carvajal, Petitioner v. Dale Artus, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 265,

181 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5383.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 95.
**AGENDA**

**Joint Meeting of the Supply Process Review Committee (PRC) 16-1 and**

**Joint Physical Inventory Working Group (JPIWG) 16-3**

**Wednesday, October 19, 2016**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          47,356
<SECURITIES>                                   107,177
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,666)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,280
<PP&E>                                          60,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,728)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,621
<BONDS>                                        164,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           478
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,818
<SALES>                                         65,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,220)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (67,507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

mniteh ~tate5 <!Court of ~eaI5 

for tbe jf eheraI <!Circuit 

MARY ANN DUPUY, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

2011-7164 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in case no. 09-2244, Judge John J. 

Farley, III. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Mary Ann Dupuy moves for a 30-day extension of 

time, until February 22, 2012, to file her reply brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 
DUPUYv. DVA 

The motion is granted. 

JAN 19 2012 

Date 

cc: Zachary M. Stolz, Esq 

James R. Sweet, Esq. 

s21 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

2 

FILED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JAN 1 92012 

JAN HORBAlY 

CLERK
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT.

The subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 1998, and the state in which
each was organized are as scheduled below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      State or
                                      Jurisdiction
                                      Under Laws of           Name Under Which
Name of Subsidiaries                  Which Organized         Subsidiaries Do Business
--------------------                  ---------------         ------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                       <C>
F&M Bank-Winchester (2)               Virginia                F&M Bank-Winchester
  F&M Mortgage Services, Inc.(1)      Virginia                 F&M Mortgage Services, Inc.
  Winchester Credit Corporation(1)    Virginia                 Winchester Credit Corporation
  Apple Title Company(1)              Virginia                 Apple Title Company
  F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver                                      F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver
    Insurance, Inc.(1)                Virginia                  Insurance
  J. V. Arthur, Inc. (1)              Virginia                J. V. Arthur, Inc.
  F&M Financial Services, Inc.(1)     Virginia                F&M Financial Services

F&M Bank-Central Virginia             Virginia                F&M Bank-Central Virginia

F&M Bank-Massanutten                  Virginia                F&M Bank-Massanutten

F&M Bank-Richmond                     Virginia                F&M Bank-Richmond

F&M Bank-West Virginia, Inc.          West Virginia           F&M Bank-West Virginia

F&M Bank-Emporia                      Virginia                F&M Bank-Emporia

F&M Bank-Peoples                      Virginia                F&M Bank-Peoples

F&M Bank-Northern Virginia            Virginia                F&M Bank-Northern Virginia

F&M Bank-Allegiance, Inc.             Maryland                F&M Bank-Allegiance

F&M Trust Company                     Virginia                F&M Trust Company

F&M Services, Inc.                    Virginia                F&M Services, Inc.
------------------------

</TABLE>

 (1) Winchester Credit Corporation, F&M Mortgage Services, Inc., Apple Title
Company, F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver Insurance, Inc., J. V. Arthur, Inc., and F&M
Financial Services, Inc., are wholly-owned subsidiaries of F&M Bank-Winchester.
Credit Bureau of Winchester is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Winchester Credit
Corporation. All other bank subsidiaries are wholly-owned by F&M National
Corporation.
 (2) Credit Bureau of Winchester, Inc. was closed as of December 1,
1998.
North Boeing Field/Georgetown 

Steam Plant Site RI/FS 

Overview: Stormwater Sampling 

Report
Background

• Investigating the storm water as a source of 

contaminants to Slip 4 of LDW

• Slip 4- Early Action Area- EPA CERCLA site;

• Boeing Field is east of Slip 4 (and LDW);

• Boeing Field is under an industrial MSGP- two points of 

discharge- one to the LDW, and another to the City of 

Seattle’s Stormwater system.

• This is a follow up study based on the first 

sampling event in 2008

Study Summary

• Compared data to the marine AL 

criteria(whole water samples) and WA 

sediment standards (SMS)

• WA Sediment Standards are CWA standards- used for 

cleanup and CWA purposes;

• Although permitted- were not sampling for 

the COCs associated with the LDW SF site:

– Sampling shows exceedances of PCBs, metals, 

PAHs 
Logistics of Study

• Storm water samples were collected at 13 

locations;

• Sampling efforts began in February - July 

2010;

• Included whole water and filtered suspended 

solids;

• Analyzed samples for: PAHs, PCB aroclors, 

metal and mercury, and dioxin/furan 

congeners

Chemical Analysis

• Metals compared to WA 

State’s SMS;

– Endpoint is AL

– SQS: exceedance of this 

is an exceedance of the 

WQS;

– CSL: Screening level.

• PCBs and PAHs 

;compared to the LAET 

& 2nd LAET:

– Functional equivalent of 

SQS/CSL
Results Sampling Whole Water

• Metals: compared to 

marine WQ criteria-

– Exceedances for cadmium, 

copper, lead and zinc

• PCBs- detected at several 

of the sampling sites;

– E.G. conc. range from 

0.016-0.145 ug/L for 

stormwater events @ 

MH108;

– Found exceedances of the 

criteria

• PAHs: HPAHs detected 

more frequently than 

LPAHs;

– Found exceedances of the 

HH WQC (0.018 ug/L);

– Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 

detected at levels that 

exceed the HH WQC
Results Summary Filtered Solids

• Total PCBs exceeded the 

LAET/2LAET in all but one 

sample;

• Base flow had some of the highest 

PCB concentrations (25 mg/kg, 22 

mg/kg)

• PAHs: Phenanthrene

frequently excceded

LAET/2LAET criteria;

– Total LPAH conc. ~ 1/10th the 

total HPAH.

• Dioxins/Furans: detectedno clear pattern of 

concentrations;

• Metals: exceedances of SMS 

WQS-

– Silver (one)- 160 mg/kg;

– Arsenic;

– Chromium (one);

– Lead (one);

– Mercury (some over 10 

mg/kg);

– Zinc (nearly every location);

– Cadmium (nearly every 

location; greatest @ 78 

mg/kg @ 102 mg/kg)
Additional Data: Surface Solids

• Parking lot sweeps were 

analyzed-

– Detected PCBs (0.116-

0.34 mg/kg) in excess of 

the SQS