### 34206 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

(iv) For the case of a shipment in a series of shipments whose schedules are related, a statement that schedule information must be protected in accordance with the provisions of §§ 73.21 and 73.22 until 10 days after the last shipment in the series has entered or originated within the State or Tribal reservation and an estimate of the date on which the last shipment in the series will enter or originate within the State or Tribal reservation.

(4) A licensee shall notify by telephone or other means a responsible individual in the office of the governor or in the office of the governor’s designee and the office of the Tribal official or in the office of the Tribal official’s designee of any schedule change that differs by more than 6 hours from the schedule information previously furnished in accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this section, and shall inform that individual of the number of hours of advance or delay relative to the written schedule information previously furnished.

(g) State officials, State employees, Tribal officials, Tribal employees, and other individuals, whether or not licensees of the Commission, who receive schedule information of the kind specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this section shall protect that information against unauthorized disclosure as specified in §§ 73.21 and 73.22.

■ 8. In § 73.59, new paragraph (l) is added to read as follows:

**§ 73.59 Relief from fingerprinting, identification and criminal history records**  **checks and other elements of background checks for designated categories of**  **individuals.**

* * * * *

(l) Tribal official or the Tribal official’s designated representative, and Tribal law enforcement personnel.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of June 2012.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–14082 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7590–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0565; Directorate Identifier 2012–NE–16–AD; Amendment 39–**  **17075; AD 2012–10–52]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Engine Technologies Turbochargers** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Cessna 206, 207, and 210 airplanes with Hartzell Engine Technologies (HET) turbochargers, part numbers (P/Ns) 406610–0005 and 406610–9005, installed. This emergency AD was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of these airplanes. This AD requires removing the affected turbochargers from service before further flight. This AD was prompted by a report of an HET turbocharger causing an engine in-flight power rollback. We are issuing this AD to prevent turbocharger bearing seizure, failed turbocharger components, and damage to the airplane.

**DATES :**  This AD is effective June 26, 2012 to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2012–10–52, issued on May 14, 2012, which contained the requirements of this amendment.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication identified in the AD as of June 26, 2012.

We must receive comments on this AD by July 26, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this AD, contact Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC, 2900 Selma Highway, Montgomery, AL 36108, phone: 334–386–5400; fax: 334–386– 5450; internet: http:// www.hartzellenginetech.com/ service

_ bulletins.html#turbos. Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Christopher Richards, Aerospace Engineer, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; phone: 847–294– 7156; fax: 847–294–7834; email: christopher.j.richards@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Discussion

On May 14, 2012, we issued Emergency AD 2012–10–52, which requires removing HET turbochargers, P/Ns 406610–0005 and 406610–9005, before further flight. This action was prompted by a report of an HET turbocharger causing an engine in-flight power rollback. Upon investigation, the turbocharger was found to have incorrectly located oil passages in the center housing, causing insufficient oil flow to the bearings. This condition, if not corrected, could result in turbocharger bearing seizure, failure of the turbocharger turbine shaft or wheel, and damage to the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

We reviewed Hartzell Engine Technologies Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 047, dated May 8, 2012. The ASB indentifies the part numbers and serial numbers of affected turbochargers and describes procedures for removing them from service.

FAA’s Determination

We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other turbochargers of the same design. We are evaluating whether the affected population needs to expand to include supplemental type certificate and parts manufacturer approval installations and may take further action.


### 34207 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

AD Requirements

This AD requires removing the affected turbochargers from service before further flight.

Minor Clarification

In the previously sent emergency AD, applicability paragraph (c)(2) inadvertently stated ‘‘Turbochargers with P/N 406610–0005 or P/N 406610– 9005 overhauled or repaired on or later than January 1, 2012, with the same turbocharger center housing P/N and date code H–0112.’’ That paragraph in this AD is clarified to state ‘‘Turbochargers with P/N 406610–0005 or P/N 406610–9005 overhauled or repaired on or later than January 1, 2012, with turbocharger center housing P/N 409836–0005 and date code H– 0112.’’ Applicability paragraph (c)(3) of the previously sent emergency AD, referenced this same turbocharger center housing P/N, which also needs to be referenced in paragraph (c)(2).

FAA’s Determination of the Effective Date

An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because the affected turbochargers need to be removed from service before further flight. Therefore, we find that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the **ADDRESSES** section. Include the docket number FAA–2012–0565 and Directorate Identifier 2012–NE–16–AD at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those
comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD. Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 80 airplanes of U.S. registry with affected turbochargers installed. We alsoestimate that it will take about 4 workhours to remove a turbocharger from service. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be $27,200. Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings

This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866,

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2012–10–52 Hartzell Engine Technologies: Amendment 39–17075; Docket No. FAA–2012–0565; Directorate Identifier 2012–NE–16–AD.
(a) Effective Date

This AD is effective June 26, 2012 to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2012–10–52 issued on May 14, 2012, which contained the requirements of this amendment.
(b) Affected ADs

None. (c) Applicability

This emergency AD applies to the following Hartzell Engine Technologies (HET) turbochargers:

(1) Turbocharger HET part number (P/N) 406610–0005 or P/N 406610–9005 with serial numbers listed in Table 1 of HET Alert Service Bulletin No. 047, dated May 8, 2012.

(2) Turbochargers with P/N 406610–0005 or P/N 406610–9005 overhauled or repaired on or later than January 1, 2012, with turbocharger center housing P/N 409836– 0005 and date code H–0112.

(3) Turbocharger center housings P/N 409836–0005 sold as piece parts which are in field/distributor inventory with date code H–
0112.

These turbochargers are installed on, but not limited to, Cessna 206, 207, and 210 airplanes with Continental Motors, Inc TSIO– 520–C, –G, –H, –M, and –R reciprocating engines installed.

(d) Unsafe Condition

This AD was prompted by a report of an HET turbocharger causing an engine in-flight power rollback. Upon investigation, the turbocharger was found to have incorrectly located oil passages in the center housing, causing insufficient oil flow to the bearings. This condition, if not corrected, could result in turbocharger bearing seizure, failure of the turbocharger turbine shaft or wheel, and damage to the airplane. We are issuing this AD to prevent turbocharger bearing seizure, failed turbocharger components, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance

Before further flight, remove from service the turbochargers identified in paragraph (c) of this emergency AD, unless already done.
(f) Special Flight Permit

Special flight permits are prohibited.


### 34208 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

The Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.
(h) Related Information

For more information about this AD, contact Christopher Richards, Aerospace Engineer, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; phone: 847–294–7156; fax: 847–294–7834; email: christopher.j.richards@faa.gov.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the following service information on the date specified. You must use the following service information to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(2) Hartzell Engine Technologies Alert Service Bulletin No. 047, dated May 8, 2012.

(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC, 2900 Selma Highway, Montgomery, AL 36108, phone: 334–386– 5400; fax: 334–386–5450; internet: http:// www.hartzellenginetech.com/service

_ bulletins.html#turbos.

(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.

(5) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/ cfr/ibr

_ locations.html. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 30, 2012. Peter A. White, Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–13855 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0445; Airspace Docket No. 12–ASO–27]** 

**Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Leesburg, FL** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule, technical amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends Class D and Class E airspace at Leesburg, FL, changing the airport’s name to Leesburg International Airport. The FAAs Aeronautical Products office requested the change to reflect the airport’s
current name.

**DATES :**  Effective date 0901 UTC, July 26, 2012. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John Fornito, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
The Rule

This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 amends Class D and Class E airspace at Leesburg, FL. Leesburg Regional Airport has been renamed Leesburg International Airport to be in concert with the FAAs aeronautical database. Accordingly, since this is an administrative change, and does not affect the boundaries, altitudes, or operating requirements of the airspace, notice and public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.

The Class D airspace, Class E surface airspace, and Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth designations are published in Paragraph 5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them, operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A. Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends controlled airspace for the Leesburg, FL, Class D and E airspace

area. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Final Rule

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.
* * * * *
ASO FL D Leesburg, FL [Amended] Leesburg International Airport, FL

(Lat. 28 ° 49 ′ 23 ′′ N., long. 81 ° 48 ′ 31 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not including 1,600 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Leesburg International Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific days and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective days and times will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D surface area.
* * * * *