alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S.
Steven Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 7, 2009



By

/s/ S. Steven SinghS. Steven SinghChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38431-38432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Theater/Musical Theater (B) Section 
(Creation & Presentation category) to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held on August 10-14, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:30 a.m. 
to 6:30 p.m. on

[[Page 38432]]

August 10, 11, and 12, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on August 13, and 
from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on August 14, in Room 714 at the Nancy 
Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506. A 
portion of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on August 13, 
will be open to the public for a policy discussion on field issues and 
needs, Leadership initiatives, Millennium projects, and guidelines.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. 
on August 10, 11, and 12, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on August 13, 
and from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on August 14, are for the purpose of 
Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on 
applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information given in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman on May 14, 1998, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-18897 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Attachment 3

Proposed Information Collection Request for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines

EPA/OW/EAD Outreach Teleconference Industry Call-In Participant List

December 8, 2009Partial List of Participants for Outreach Call with Industry Stakeholders on December 8,

2009

AES Warrior Run Allegheny Energy

Ameren

American Electric Power

Con Edison Consumers Energy Company DTE Energy

Edison Electric Institute Florida Power and Light Company Otter Tail Power Company Progress Energy Southern Company Tampa Electric Tennessee Valley Authority Utility Water Act Group
No. 11-5846.

#### Andrew Neston, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6355.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-5345.

#### Darren Cephas, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 299,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5734.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 528.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39363-39364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19429]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Termination; 
American Surety and Casualty Co., Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co. of 
Cincinnati, OH Heart of America Fire and Casualty Co. and North Star 
Reinsurance Corp.

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 19 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 1997 Revision, published July 1, 1997, at 62 FR 35548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificates 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named Companies, under 
the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as 
acceptable

[[Page 39364]]

sureties on Federal bonds were terminated effective June 30, 1998.
    These Companies were last listed as acceptable sureties on Federal 
bonds at 62 FR 35548, July 1, 1997.
    With respect to any bonds currently in force with above listed 
Companies, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration 
and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted 
from these Companies. In addition, bonds that are continuous in nature 
should not be renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html or through our computerized 
public bulletin board system, FMS Inside Line, at (202) 874-6887. A 
hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), 
Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When 
ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048000-
00509-8.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6A11, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 98-19429 Filed 2-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-16]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Ainsworth, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Ainsworth, NE.

DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 27480 is effective on 
0901 UTC, August 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on May 19, 1998 (63 
FR 27480). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on August 13, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on June 16, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-19670 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Fab Industries, Inc.
New York, New York

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 11,
1997, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed June 28, 1993, the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed January 31, 1992 and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed June 9, 1989 of our report dated February 15, 2002,
except for Note 16, as to which the date is March 1, 2002, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Fab Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 1, 2001.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption experts in the
Prospectus forming a part of such Registration Statements.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
March 1, 2002
<PAGE> 1

                                                                   EXHIBIT  21

                     Falcon Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                          ---------------------------

      The following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company:  Kaydee
Metal Products Corporation; Falcon Mexican Holdings, Inc.; Falcon
International, E.U.R.L. (a French corporation); Falcon De Juarez, S.A. de
C.V., Fundiciones Tecnicas, S.A., and Falcon De Baja California, S.A. de C.V.
(Mexican corporations). Falcon Mimon, a.s. (a Czech Republic corporation) is
an 84%-owned subsidiary of the Company.

                                    21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,091
<INVENTORY>                                     40,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,673
<PP&E>                                         224,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,818
<BONDS>                                        318,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   496,508
<SALES>                                         60,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,363
<CGS>                                           44,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-8073.

#### Joseph Tinker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1206, 131 S. Ct. 1059,

178 L. Ed. 2d 875,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 950.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 985 A.2d 463.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IX--Honolulu District Advisory Council; Public Hearing

    The Small Business Administration Region IX Honolulu District 
Advisory Council located in the geographical area of Honolulu, Hawaii, 
will hold a public meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 30, 1998 at 
the Business Information and Counseling Center, 111 Bishop Street, 
Suite 204, Training Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, to discuss such matters 
as may be presented by members, staff of the Small Business 
Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call: Andrew K. Poepoe, District 
Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, 
Room 2-235, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850-4981, (808) 541-2965.

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
Shirl Thomas,
Director, Office of External Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-19235 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 11-5984.

#### Craig Bundrant, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 807, 132 S. Ct. 390,

181 L. Ed. 2d 9,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6407.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.10. APPENDIX 6.10**

**MILSTRIP MESSAGE SUPPLY ASSISTANCE REQUEST**

FROM:  {APPROPRIATE INDICATOR OF SENDER}

TO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE(S)}

INFO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE(S)}

SUBJECT:  MILSTRIP SUPPLY ASSISTANCE REQUEST

1. THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIENCING SERIOUS PROBLEMS DUE TO LACK OF ITEM(S) SHOWN BELOW.  REQUEST AGGRESSIVE ACTION TO ACCELERATE DELIVERY AND IMPROVE ESD.

DOC NO. W/SUFFIXNSN

FB2300/1152/0111/0	8305-01-123-4567

2. SUBSTITUTES.  LIST ALL KNOWN AND ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE NSNs OR PART NUMBERS. IF NONE, SO STATE.

3. NEXT HIGHER ASSEMLY.  IF NONE, SO STATE

4. LATERAL SUPPORT.  LIST ANY ACTIVITIES CONTACTED IN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN ITEM THROUGH LATERAL SUPPORT AND/OR KNOWN ACTIVITIES USING SAME END ITEM OF WEAPONS SYSTEM.  IF NONE, SO STATE.

5. KNOWN SOURCE.  LIST ANY KNOWN SOURCES FOR THE ITEM TO INCLUDE NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER (IF KNOWN).  IF NONE, SO STATE.

6. MISSION IMPACT STATEMENT.  INCLUDE END ITEM DESCRIPTION, WEAPON SYSTEM APPLICATION. INDICATE MISSION DEGRADATION CREATED BY LACK OF ITEM(S) OR STATEMENT “A CLASSIFIED NMCS CONDITION EXISTS DUE TO LACK OF REQUIRED ASSTETS.”

7. REMARKS.  INCLUDE ADDITIONAL PERTINENT DATA NOT COVERED ABOVE.

**SAMPLE**

**1**

APPENDIX 1.10

AP6.10-1

APPENDIX 6.10
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2005,
of El Paso Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ D.
Mark LelandD. Mark LelandExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 4, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Corporation and will be retained by El Paso Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit No. 32.1



Form 10-K

Synthetic Blood International, Inc.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Nicora, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 15, 2005

/S/ Robert NicoraChief Executive Officer




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 15, 2005

/S/ David JohnsonChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-7539.

#### Tyrone Hunter, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1124, 131 S. Ct. 846,

178 L. Ed. 2d 580,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9817.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 1.
Approved DLMS Change 62A

Addendum for Revision to DLMS Supplement 856R,

Shipment Status Material Returns

1. ORIGINATOR: Supply Process Review Committee, Ellen Hilert, Co-Chair, DLA 

J673, Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO), 703-767-0676 (DSN 

427), ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply

3. REFERENCE: DLMSO memorandum, Approved DLMS Change 62, Revision to 

DLMS Supplement: Shipment Status Material Returns (Supply), March 7, 2002

4. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Addendum for Revision to DS 856R, Shipment Status Material Returns

b. Description of Change: This change modifies the DS 856R to add DLMS 

enhancement notes to several codes in the 2/N101/220 segment for clarification.

c. Procedures: Revise DLMS Supplement for 856R, Ship Notice/Manifest as 

follows:

# Location Revision Reason Federal IC 

1 2/N101/220 Add DLMS enhancement note 2. to the following code

CA Carrier

DLMS Note:

2. DLMS enhancement: See introductory DLMS note 

3a. 

Clarification No Revision

2 2/N101/220 Add DLMS enhancement note 2. to the following code 

MF Manufacturer of Goods

DLMS Note:

2. DLMS enhancement: See introductory DLMS note 

3a. 

Clarification No Revision
3 2/N101/220 Add DLMS enhancement note 2. to the following code 

SF Ship From

DLMS Note:

2. DLMS enhancement: See introductory DLMS note 

3a. 

Clarification No Revision

4 2/N101/220 Add DLMS enhancement note 2. to the following code

ST Ship To

DLMS Note:

2. DLMS enhancement: See introductory DLMS note 

3a. 

Clarification No Revision

d. Alternatives: None identified.

5. REASON FOR CHANGE: The missing DLMS enhancement notes were an 

oversight and adding these notes supports DLMS implementation and desired 

functionality.

6. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Supports DLMS implementation

b. Disadvantages: None identified 

7. IMPACT: 

a. Publications. Federal IC 856R and corresponding DoD 4000.25-M DS. All 

applicable revisions will be submitted to the Federal IC.