alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aircraft Museum 

Tax-Exempt Certificate for Purchase of Aviation-Grade Kerosene

Notification of Registration:

The undersigned Buyer certifies under penalties of perjury that it is registered by the Internal Revenue Service 

with registration number and that the Buyer’s registration has 

not been revoked or suspended by the Internal Revenue Service.

General Certification Requirements:

By signing this certificate, the Buyer’s representative certifies that the Buyer is exempt from income tax as an 

organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, operates as a museum under a state 

or District of Columbia charter and is operated exclusively for the procurement, care, and exhibition of 

aircraft of the type used for combat or transport in World War II. 

Certification Of Aviation-Grade Kerosene Use By An Aircraft Museum: Check the applicable type of purchase.

 The article or articles purchased in the accompanying order, or on the reverse side hereof, (or)

 All purchases placed by the activity for the period commencing: 

and ending ,

(Start Date) (End Date – not more than one year after start date)

are for the use of the Buyer. The Buyer is purchasing aviation-grade kerosene (JP5, JP8, Jet A, Jet A-1) 

for Buyer’s use as a fuel for use or used by an aircraft museum in an aircraft or vehicle owned by such 

museum and used exclusively for the procurement, care, and exhibition of aircraft of the type used for 

combat or transport in World War II. If Buyer sells the aviation-grade kerosene to which this certificate 

relates and does not deliver it into the fuel supply tank of a qualified aircraft or vehicle, Buyer will be 

liable for tax unless Buyer obtains a certificate from its buyer stating that the aviation-grade kerosene will 

be used as a fuel in an aircraft. 

The undersigned understands that if the fuel is used otherwise than as stated above and for a purpose 

taxable under section 4041 of the Internal Revenue Code, the undersigned will be liable for the tax upon 

such use, and that the undersigned must be prepared to establish by satisfactory evidence the purpose for 

which the fuel purchased under this certificate was used.

I understand that the fraudulent use of this certificate to secure exemption will subject me and all parties 

making such fraudulent use of this certificate to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for 

not more than 5 years, or both, together with costs of prosecution. I also understand that I must be 

prepared to establish by satisfactory evidence the purpose for which the article was used.

Defense Energy Support Center Account Number (If Known)

Name Of Museum

Address Of Museum 

Printed Or Typed Name Of Person Signing

Title Of Person Signing

Signature And Date Signed

Telephone Number
No. 11-5386.

#### Frederick Karl Jost, Petitioner v. United States Postal Service, et al.

565 U.S. 904, 132 S. Ct. 304,

181 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5425.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 957.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33595]


Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Consolidated Rail Corporation

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board exempts from the prior approval requirements of 49 
U.S.C. 10902 the acquisition and operation by Delaware and Hudson 
Railway Company, Inc. (D&H) of 1.7 miles of rail line in Lackawanna 
County, PA. D&H will acquire Consolidated Rail Corporation's (Conrail) 
Taylor Yard Industrial Track between milepost 135.84 and milepost 
136.7. Included in this is the D&H segment of Conrail's Keyser Wye 
track between milepost 135.84 and milepost 136.37, which is parallel 
and adjacent to the subject portion of the Conrail Keyser Industrial 
Track.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on August 14, 1998. Petitions 
to stay must be filed by July 30, 1998. Petitions to reopen must be 
filed by August 10, 1998.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33595, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of all pleadings must be 
served on petitioner's representative, Larry D. Starns, Esq., Leonard, 
Street & Deinard, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Minneapolis, MN 
55402.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., 1925 K Street, 
N.W., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
at (202) 565-1695.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 29, 1998.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18047 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
No. 10-11003.

#### Timothy Eugene Brown, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 201,

181 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6290.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 489.
ASRAC Agenda



### Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee

U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building

1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20585

February 26, 2013

Tuesday, February 26

ROOM: 8E

‐ 089

8:30

‐ 9:00 ARRIVAL

9:00

‐ 10:00 Swearing In ( Closed to Public ) DOE Human Capital Management

Ethics Discussion ( Closed to Public ) DOE General Counsel

10:00

‐ 10:45 Welcome and Introductions Roland Risser/ ASRAC Members

10:45

‐ 11:15 Appliance Standards Program Overview John Cymbalsky

11:15

‐ 12:00 Overview of Committee Operations/ John Cymbalsky/ ASRAC

Framework Members

12:00

‐ 1:00 LUNCH

1:00

‐ 2:30 Committee Task Discussion

– Identifying DOE/ ASRAC Members

Initial Committee Efforts to Best Facilitate

Program Activities

2:30

‐ 3:00 Next Steps

‐ Committee Vote on Tasks DOE/ ASRAC Members

Discuss Plans to Form Necessary Working

Groups and Identify Next Meeting

Date/Location for Committee

3:00

‐ 3:30 Public Comment Period Public Attendees

3:30

‐ 3:45 Closing Comments/ Adjourn

Additional Information:

Web site: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildin gs/appliance_standards/asrac.html

Docket: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE

‐ 2013

‐ BT

‐ NOC

‐ 0005
No. 10-11255.

#### Willie James Easley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 234,

181 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7138.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Richard L. Cox, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cannae Holdings, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 30, 2018

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Richard L. Cox                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard L. Cox    Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
DISABLING OF ACCOUNTS AFTER 30 DAYS INACTIVITY

The requirement for disabling accounts after 30 days due to non-use is a Security 

Technical Implementation Guideline (STIG) requirement mandated by Defense 

Information Systems Agency (DISA). The STIG stipulates that all accounts are to be 

disabled after 30 days of inactivity/no access.

After 45 days of inactivity, your account will be deleted and you will have to re-register 

using the Pre-Registration URL noted below.

The DLA Chief Information Officer (CIO) reiterated the 30-day requirement in a DLA 

policy letter dated 6 November 2014. Due to our security requirements, DLA is not able 

to implement policies or settings to the MEDALS application without any processes to 

disable accounts that are inactive.

If you find that your account is disabled and you are under the 45-day deletion window, 

please contact the DLA Enterprise Helpdesk (EHD) group by e-mailing the DLA 

Enterprise IT Helpdesk. Include the name of the application/system and your UserId/Name as this speeds up the ability to find your account. If your account is inactive, but 

not deleted, you can be reinstated by our Account Management shop.

If you find that your account is deleted after contacting the DLA EHD, you will have to

register for access via the following URL: 

https://public.logisticsinformationservice.dla.mil/PreRegistration/. After the 

Profile/Registration page is filled out, the system proceeds to the Logistics Information 

Services Access Control Web Registration page. You select the levels of access you’re 

requesting for each system on this page. After clicking the ‘Next’ button, the next page 

lists the 2875’s you just requested at the bottom left of the page. Click the “Print <app 

name>” to open a PDF of the 2875, finish filling it out, save, and forward through your 

normal chain of command.

A good practice is to set a calendar reminder to log-in to these accounts before they 

expire if you know you will be gone past the 30-day Inactive mark or the 45-day Account 

Deletion mark.
SCPW-13-0001202

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

BRANDON SAK TACHINO, Petitioner.

vs. 

THE HONORABLE PATRICK W. BORDER, Judge of the 

First Circuit of the State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge, 

and 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 12-1-1445)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

On May 31, 2013, petitioner Brandon Sak Tachino filed a

petition for a writ of mandamus. On June 12, 2013, petitioner

filed a notice of withdrawal of his petition for a writ of

mandamus. Inasmuch as it appears that the petition for a writ of

mandamus has been withdrawn, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 18, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0001202

18-JUN-2013

02:28 PM
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1786. RICHARDWALKERv.U.S.BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.

U. S. Bank, National Association filed a dispossessory action against Richard

Walker in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Walker appealed to the

superior court. The superior court entered summary judgment in favor of U. S. Bank,

and Walker filed a notice of appeal to this Court. However, the superior court

dismissed Walker’s notice of appeal upon finding that Walker had unreasonably and

inexcusably caused delay in the filing of a transcript. Walker then filed the instant

direct appeal from the superior court’s order that dismissed his notice of appeal. We

lack jurisdiction over this appeal for the following reasons.

Although an order dismissing a notice of appeal may be directly appealable,

see, e.g., American Med. Security Group v. Parker, 284 Ga. 102, 103 (2) (663 SE2d

697) (2008), the underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought

in determining the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-

468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). Here, because the summary judgment disposed of a de

novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Walker was required to follow the

discretionary appeal procedures to obtain this Court’s review. See OCGA § 5-6-35

(a) (1); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); Strachan v.

Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Walker’s

failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. See Thompson v. Salacoa Highland Property Owners’ Assn., 295 Ga.

App. 478, 480 (672 SE2d 448) (2009) (dismissing direct appeal, irrespective of trial

court’s error of dismissing notice of appeal, where the underlying summary judgment

wassubject to the discretionary application statute, yet appellant had failed to comply

July 10, 2017
therewith); Okekpe v. Commerce Funding Corp., 218 Ga. App. 705, 706 (463 SE2d

23) (1995).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/10/2017
IGD 1005: ESOHMS OBJECTIVES & ACHIEVEMENTS PLAN

A. PURPOSE

We execute and maintain, as appropriate, programs for achieving ESOH objectives in 

accordance with the integrate International Organization of Standards (ISO) 14001:2015 

and 45001:2018 standards guidance documents. This IGD provides the framework of 

DLA Strategic Materials ESOHMS objectives and how to achieve these planned 

objectives. The DLA-SM ESOHMS applies to all DLA-SM facilities, their employees, and 

all personnel working on behalf of DLA-SM. 

B. PROCESS

1. ESOH objectives

DLA-SM will establish ESOH objectives at relevant functions and levels, 

considering significant environmental aspects and analyzed job hazards; 

considering associated legal requirements, compliance obligations, and other 

requirements; considering risks and opportunities, and continual improvement on 

the ESOHMS and ESOH performance.

The ESOH objectives will: be consistent with the ESOHMS Policy; be 

measurable (if practicable) or capable of performance evaluation; be monitored; 

be communicated; and be appropriately updated.

ESOH objectives will also: consider applicable requirements; consider the results 

of ESOH risks, aspects, and opportunities; and consider the results of 

consultation with workers, along with workers’ representatives, as applicable. 

2. Planning actions to achieve ESOH objectives

 When planning how to achieve ESOH objectives, DLA-SM will determine: what 

will be done; what resources will be required; who will be responsible; when it will 

be completed; how the results will be evaluated, including indicators for 

monitoring progress toward achievement of measurable ESOH objectives; and 

how actions to achieve ESOH objectives can be integrated into the DLA-SM 

business processes. 

All documented information on the ESOH objectives and plans to achieve them

will be maintained and retained.

C. ESOHMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

1. DLA-SM ESOHMS Policy Statement

2. DLA-SM ESOH Management Plan

3. DLA-SM Activities and Environmental Aspects

4. DLA-SM Job Hazard Analyses

“Any reproduction of this document may not reflect the current version. Please refer to 

the ‘I Am The Key’ website for the most current version.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 40072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 120

[Docket Nos. 97N-0511, 93N-0325, and 97N-0296]
RIN 0910-AA43


Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP); Procedures 
for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice; Extension 
of Comment Period; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; preliminary regulatory impact analysis; 
extension of comment period; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
document that appeared in the Federal Register of July 8, 1998 (63 FR 
37057). The document extended the comment period on a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of April 24, 1998, to ensure the safe 
and sanitary processing of fruit and vegetable juices and juice 
products and on the related preliminary regulatory impact analysis and 
initial regulatory flexibility analysis published in the Federal 
Register of May 1, 1998. The document was published with an incorrect 
agency contact. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shellee A. Davis, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-306), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4681.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 98-18286, appearing on page 37057 
in the Federal Register of Wednesday, July 8, 1998, the following 
correction is made:
    1. On page 37057, in the second column, the agency contact is 
corrected to read ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shellee A. Davis, 
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-306), Food and Drug 
Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4681.''

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-19954 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Chris J. Stern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008, of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Chris J. Stern     
|                      |  |     |  | Chris J. Stern         
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3329

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5186 Benito Street in Montclair, California, as the ``Paul Eaton 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAUL EATON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5186 Benito Street in Montclair, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Paul Eaton Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paul Eaton 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3329

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5186 Benito Street in Montclair, California, as the ``Paul Eaton 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
TYPED NAME OF ENVIRONMENTAL STAFF OFFICER

RECORD OF DETERMINATION

ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION

BASED ON ANALYSIS, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE ACTION (Select one of the following): 

REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL

DD-M(AR)1327

TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION (Brief statement on proposed action)

DATE OF PROPOSED ACTION (Month and Year)

1a. Is covered in an existing EA or EIS, or is essentially identical to a previous action covered by an EA 

or EIS which revealed no significant environmental impact, and needs no further environmental 

analysis. 

DATE

1b. Is partially covered in an existing EA or EIS and required preparation of a supplement.

DATE

TITLE OF EA OR EIS

TITLE OF EA OR EIS

2a. Is a categorically excluded action (CX), and there are no special circumstances that require further 

evaluation. 

DLA CX NUMBER (See Attachment 1)

2b. Has special circumstances associated with the action that disqualifies it as a CX. Consequently, an 

EA (EIS) is required.

SIGNATURE DATE

DLA FORM 1664, DEC 80 (EG)

REMARKS

PDF (DLA)