alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    228,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               408,849
<PP&E>                                         342,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 812,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,372
<BONDS>                                        365,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,561
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   812,946
<SALES>                                      1,095,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,095,193
<CGS>                                          966,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  966,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,084)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.28)
        


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Certifications**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Richard Li, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

Date: July 27,2022 

 

/s/ Richard Li

Richard Li

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. andwill be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
EXHIBIT 99.1




                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
-----------------------------
Martin E. Stein, Jr.
November 11, 2002
**
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Despegar.com, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2020, as amended by Amendment No. 1 as filed on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto Lopez Gaffney, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley-Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 (i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and 

 
 (ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 13, 2020 

 
By: 
/s/ Alberto Lopez Gaffney
Name: Alberto Lopez GaffneyTitle: Chief Financial Officer**
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21 (a)


                        EMONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
                             Listing of Subsidiaries

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                 State of
                         Subsidiary                            Incorporation
     ------------------------------------------------        ------------------
      <S>                                                    <C> 
      Emons Finance Corp.                                         Delaware

      Emons Industries, Inc.                                      New York

      Emons Logistics Services, Inc.                              Delaware

      Emons Railroad Group, Inc.                                  Delaware

          St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad Company                Delaware

          Yorkrail, Inc.                                          Delaware

      Maine Intermodal Transportation, Inc.                       Delaware

      Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company                Pennsylvania

</TABLE>
No. 11-6303.

#### Matthew T. Millhouse, Jr., Petitioner v. Donna Zickefoose, Warden.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 440,

181 L. Ed. 2d 252,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7211.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 94.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L. P. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008       
|                        
|/s/ Martin E, Stein, Jr.
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.51-1 APPENDIX 3.51

AP3.51. APPENDIX 3.51

STATUS NOTIFICATION TRANSACTION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZ9.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the activity which submitted the 

incoming transaction being rerouted or 

revised by the Defense Automated 

Addressing System (DAAS).

Request 7 Perpetuate from incoming request.

Federal Supply Class 8-11 When MILSTRIP Status Code BG is 

entered in record positions 79-80, enter the 

correct FSC for the National Item 

Identification Number; otherwise, perpetuate 

from original transaction.

Other fields 12-56 Perpetuate from original transaction. 

Routed Document 

Identification

57-59 Enter DIC identification from record 

positions 1-3 of the incoming transaction 

being rerouted or revised by the DAAS.

Other Fields 60-66 Perpetuate data from original transaction.

Routing Identifier

Code 

67-69 When MILSTRIP Status Code BM is 

entered in record positions 79-80, enter RIC

of the source of supply to whom DAAS is 

rerouting the transaction; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Other Fields 70-76 Perpetuate from original transaction.

Blank 77-78 Leave blank.

Status 79-80 Enter MILSTRIP Status Code BG when the 

FSC in the original transaction was revised. 

Enter MILSTRIP Status Code BM when the 

original transaction was rerouted to the 

correct source of supply.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG98-9-002]


Warren Transportation, Inc.; Notice of Filing

July 17, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 13, 1998, Warren Transportation, Inc. 
(Warren) filed revised standards of conduct in response to a June 12, 
1998 Order on Standards of Conduct. 83 FERC para. 61,297 (1998).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before August 3, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19588 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Record of Di scussion Doc ket No . FAA- Dire cto rate Id e ntifier: -AD



### With whom outsid e the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Des ign Approval Holder , manufacturer , ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA , ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

O R GAN IZATION PERSON C O NTACTED D A TE T OPICS D ISCUSSED 

### Air Transport J oe White August 12, 2013 Co ncur. 

### Assoc iation (A TA)

Othe r / Additiona l Inf o r mation:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chiefexecutive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-10592.

#### Kelvin Jerod Holman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 942, 132 S. Ct. 398,

181 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7440.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 755.
**DEFENSE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS**

**FINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE (FPRC) MEETING**

**AGENDA**

***Meeting Goal: Share and Learn; ask lots of questions!***

Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          16,632
<SECURITIES>                                       571
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     39,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,332
<PP&E>                                         228,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,530
<BONDS>                                        297,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,671
<SALES>                                         58,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,144
<CGS>                                           43,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    84
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                661
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       661
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Highlights: Overview of Findings Regarding 

Reproductive Health 

Men and women who are planning to have children should not smoke. Health professionals and research 

scientists have long known that cigarette smoking and exposure to tobacco smoke are harmful to 

reproductive health, affecting fertility and development of the fetus and reducing the chances of a healthy 

pregnancy and delivery. Tobacco smoke contains thousands of harmful chemicals, some of which are known 

to be toxic to reproductive health.

Smoking Affects Fertility in Women

Earlier studies linked smoking with reduced fertility in women. Current studies suggest that smoking affects 

estrogen and other hormones and could make it more difficult for women to become pregnant.

Scientific studies link smoking during pregnancy to problems in the fallopian tubes that eggs travel through 

to reach the womb. Exposure to tobacco smoke reduces effective functioning of these tubes and could 

decrease fertility. Evidence suggests that smoking may lead to an increased risk for ectopic pregnancy, a 

condition in which the fertilized egg attaches to the wall of the fallopian tube or elsewhere outside the 

womb and begins to develop but cannot survive. Ectopic pregnancy poses a serious risk to the health of the 

mother.

Tobacco Smoke Jeopardizes a Healthy Pregnancy

Studies also suggest a relationship between tobacco and miscarriage. Tobacco smoke contains carbon 

monoxide that deprives the fetus of oxygen. Tobacco smoke also contains other chemicals that could have 

toxic effects on the developing fetus.

There is consistent evidence that mothers who smoke are more likely to deliver their babies early. Preterm 

delivery is a leading cause of death, disability, and disease among newborns.

One in every five babies born to mothers who smoke during pregnancy has low birth weight. Babies born 

too small or too early are not as healthy. Babies whose mothers smoke are also about three times as likely to 

die from SIDS (crib death).

Maternal smoking is also known to cause tissue damage in the fetus, particularly in the lung and brain, and 

some evidence suggests a link between maternal smoking and cleft lip. 

Smoking Affects Men’s Reproductive Health

The effects of tobacco use on reproductive health are not limited to women. Researchers have also found 

that smoking might damage the DNA in men’s sperm. This DNA damage might decrease fertility or lead to 

miscarriage.

Disclaimer: Data and findings provided on this page reflect the content of the 2010 Surgeon General’s Report (How Tobacco Smoke 

Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General). More recent 

information may exist elsewhere on the Smoking & Tobacco Use Web site (for example, in fact sheets, frequently asked questions, 

or other materials that are reviewed on a regular basis and updated accordingly).

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

Office on Smoking and Health
No. 10-10899.

#### Sharita Pankey, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 942, 132 S. Ct. 399,

181 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7338.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 529.
Augusta, 2014 Mr. Brett Kruger Acting Division Chief U . S . Air Carrier Licensing Division U . S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

I COZEN **')O'CONNOR** Marlt W . Atwood DirectPhone 202 · 463 · 2513 Direct Fax 202 · 640 · 5238 matwood@cozen.com Re: Application of Frontier Airlines, Inc. for Exemption (Docket DOT-OST-2014- 0132) Dear Mr. Kruger: We have polled each of the U . S. air carrier representat

i ves listed on the attached service list regarding the above-referenced appl i cation. Each of the carrier representat

i ves has indicated that they have no objection to the Department

' s grant of the requested exemptilon authority. Sincerely , COZEN O'CONNOR By 

# ~-:!**~ i~M**  LEGAL \ 199764 51\1 16271 Street, NW Suit e 1100 Washington, D . C. 20006 202 . 912 . 4800 800 . 540 . 1355 202.861.1905 Fax cozen . comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing Polling Letter of Frontier Airlines ,Inc . by electronic mail upon the follow
i ng : ABX Air, Air Transport lnt'l: American Airlines: Alaska Airlines , Florida West: Amerijet lnt'l: Atlas Air: Centurion Air Cargo : Delta Air Lines : ExpressJet, SkyWest: Federal Aviation Administration
: Federal Express : JetBiue : Kalitta Air : Polar Air Cargo : Southern Air : Southwest Airlines : Spirit A i rlines : Sun Country Airlines : Un i ted Airlines: United Parcel Serv i ce : Virgin America : Dated : August 8, 2014 II (i , \1 **IW77H~I1** rsilverberg@sgbdc.com howard. kass@aa.com robert .w i rick@aa

.com abigail
. donovan@aa

.com marshall

. sinick@squirepb

. com edward
. sauer@squirepb

. com jcanny@amerijet.com rpommer@atlasair. com joh n@mietuslaw.com sascha . vanderbellen@delta

.com christopher

.wa l ker@delta

.com gmurphy@crowell.com john .s . duncan@faa

. gov nssparks@fedex. com cefelts@fedex

.com jhill@cooley.com perkmann@cooley

.com psanderlin@kalittaair

.com kevin . montgomery@polaraircargo

. com agoerlich@ggh
- airlaw . com bob . kneisley@wnco

. com leslie . abbott@wnco

. com jyoung@yklaw

.com dkirstein@yklaw

.com thomas
. ting@suncountry.com hershel.kamen@united

.com dan . weiss@united

.com steve . morrissey@united

.com gmurphy@crowell

.com anita . mosner@hklaw

.com mlbenge@zsr

l aw .com Kenneth C . Hines
01|Color               
02|Design              
03|Designator          
04|Dimensions          
05|Directional         
06|Heat Treatment      
07|Indicator           
08|Location            
09|Material            
10|Measurement         
11|Method              
12|Quantity            
13|Screw Thread        
14|Shape               
15|Standard            
16|Style               
17|Surface Treatment   
18|Type                
19|Miscellaneous
EXHIBIT 10.55



March 2, 1996

Mr. Jackie L. Boatman
Farah Incorporated
88889 Gateway West
El Paso, Texas 79925

Re:  Extension of Employment Agreement

Dear Jackie:

Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated  Employment  Agreement by
and between Farah Incorporated (the "Company") and yourself dated August 2, 1994
(the  "Agreement").  The  Company  wishes to extend  the term of the  Agreement.
Therefore, the Company proposes that Section 1(b) of the Agreement be amended to
delete  the date  "March 1, 1996" and to insert the date  "March 1,  1998".  All
other terms and provisions of the Agreement will remain unchanged.

If the foregoing terms are acceptable to you, please indicate your acceptance by
signing below.

Very truly yours,

Farah Incorporated


/s/ Richard C. Allender
Richard C. Allender
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer



Agreed and accepted as of the 4th day of March, 1996:


/s/ Jackie L. Boatman
Jackie L. Boatman
<PAGE>
*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP7.32 APPENDIX 7.32**

**REASON FOR REVERSAL CODE**

AP7.32-1	APPENDIX 7.32
No. 11-5839.

#### Lee Hope Thrasher, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 351,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7098.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 582.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 12, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 12, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0182. VESTER L. ADAMSON II v. BROOKE RICHARDS ADAMSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CV0673
<PAGE> 1

                                 EXHIBIT  21
                                 -----------

                   Falcon Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                       SUBSIDIARIES  OF  THE  COMPANY
                       ------------------------------

   The following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company:  Kaydee Metal
Products Corporation; Falcon International, E.U.R.L. (a French corporation);
Falcon De Juarez, S.A. de C.V.(a Mexican corporation); and Fundiciones,
Tecnicas, S.A. (a Mexican corporation).  Falcon Mimon, a.s. (a Czech Republic
corporation) is a 75%-owned subsidiary of the Company.
No. 11-5142.

#### Michael Chaney, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 273,

181 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5363.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 394.
No. 10-10898.

#### Carmen Diane Matkin, Petitioner v. Gloria Henry, Warden.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 187,

181 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5883.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.