alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18928]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (1189); Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering & Environmental 
Systems.
    Date and Time: July 30, 1998, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
320 & 330, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Contact Person: Dr. A. Fred Thompson, Program Director, 
Environmental Technology Program, Division of Bioengineering & 
Environmental Systems, Room 565, NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230 703/306-1318.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Industrial Ecology proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18928 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
No. 11-5104.

#### Antion Lamond Knox, Petitioner v. Randall G. Workman, Warden.

565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 269,

181 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5373.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 781.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          117546                  117546
<SECURITIES>                                     35758                   35758
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      63334                   63334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                239618                  239618
<PP&E>                                          233780                  233780
<DEPRECIATION>                                  118272                  118272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  394272                  394272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            69091                   69091
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          2546                    2546
<OTHER-SE>                                      311672                  311672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    394272                  394272
<SALES>                                         224793                  661856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                224793                  661856
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   100157                  319067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 70879                  183289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  53757                  113736
<INCOME-TAX>                                     19884                   42084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              33691                   71652
<DISCONTINUED>                                    4985                    9372
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     28706                   62280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57                    1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56                    1.22
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-5265.

#### Guy L. Gerken, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 289,

181 L. Ed. 2d 174,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5579.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV, denied.
# NYTS99FMTS

||
||
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0064. HEATHER ANN COOPER v. GREGORY KEILWITZ.

In this domestic relations matter, the trial court granted defendant Gregory

Keilwitz’s motion for a protective order on March 16, 2020. On July 24, 2020, the

court issued a final order denying plaintiff Heather Cooper’s petition to change the

names of the parties’ minor children. On August 11, 2020, the court granted

Keilwitz’s motion for OCGA § 9-15-14 (b) attorney fees and ordered Cooper to pay

Keilwitz’s counsel $3,558.08 in attorney fees attributable to this litigation. Cooper

filed this application for discretionary review on September 11, 2020, seeking to

appeal all three trial court orders. We lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of

OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for

appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734

(380 SE2d 57) (1989). Pretermitting whether a timely discretionary application

following the trial court’s August 11 order – the most recent of the three orders

Cooper seeks to appeal – would have authorized appellate review of all three orders,

her application was untimely filed 31 days after entry of that order. Consequently,

October 06, 2020
Cooper’s application for discretionary review is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction. See Boyle, 190 Ga. App. at 734.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/06/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
             EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
             FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
             IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
             STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                   25,609
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            26,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                486
<INVENTORY>                              10,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         64,106
<PP&E>                                   61,764
<DEPRECIATION>                           47,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          103,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    26,434
<BONDS>                                  42,204
<COMMON>                                  8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                  71
<OTHER-SE>                                5,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            103,499
<SALES>                                  91,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         91,650
<CGS>                                    69,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            88,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.20
        

</TABLE>
• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 44 C 

. Corrective Action for Injection Wells 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

PART 144 - REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM - WAC 

173-303 

SUBPART A - GENERAL PROVISIONS
 

~, Ct1 

PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PART 144 - WAC 173-~

interim status ~l p . 

for Class I wells 144.1(h) ~050 X. 

SUBPART D - AUTHORIZATION BY PERMIT 

• 

. APPLICATION FOR APERMIT. AUTHORIzATION BY PERMIT - WAC 173-218 

information -~i requirements 144.31<g)(1) . 050 X 

information on 

hazardous waste tAb 

releases 144.31 (g)(2) ~050 X 

preliminary site 

investigations 144.31 (g)(3) ~~050 X 

PART 265 -1f\JTERIMSTATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF 

HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 

SUBPART A - GENERAL
 

PURPOSE. SCOPE. AND APPLICABILITY 

remove (c)(2) 265.1 (c)(2) 400(2)(c)(ii) X 

PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: 

THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM 

SUBPART F - SP.ECIALFORMS OF PERMITS
 

PERMITS BY RULE
 

complies with 

264.101 270.60(b)(3)(i) 802(3) X 

• 

UICwell is
 

the only unit 270.60(b)(3){ji) 802(3)
 X 

December 1, 1987 - Page 4 of 8
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Three-Five Systems,
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack
L. Saltich, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Jack L. Saltich
Jack L. Saltich
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Three-Five
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit      21**

**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Name                of Subsidiary**                  | **State                of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                                      |
| AA                DCAP Greenbrook Inc.                 | New                Jersey                 |
| AIA-DCAP                Corp.(1)                       | Pennsylvania                              |
| Baron                Cycle, Inc. (2)                   | New                York                   |
| Barry                Scott Acquisition Corp.(2)        | New                York                   |
| Barry                Scott Agency Inc.(2)              | New                York                   |
| Barry                Scott Companies, Inc.(1)          | Delaware                                  |
| Blast                Acquisition Corp.                 | Delaware                                  |
| DCAP                Management Corp.                   | New                York                   |
| Dealers                Choice Automotive Planning Inc. | New                York                   |
| DCAP                Accurate, Inc.(2)                  | Delaware                                  |
| IAH,                Inc.                               | Delaware                                  |
| Intandem                Corp.                          | New                York                   |
| Payments                Inc.                           | New                York                   |

| (1)   | A                wholly-owned subsidiary of Blast Acquisition                Corp. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | A                wholly-owned subsidiary of Barry Scott Companies,                Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 11-6149.

#### Wendel R. Wardell, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 955, 132 S. Ct. 430,

181 L. Ed. 2d 280,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7215.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 1279.
No. 11-5307.

#### Elena Sturdza, Petitioner v. United Arab Emirates, et al.

565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 295,

181 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5635,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 494.
|               |
|---------------|
|               |  |  |  |  |
| Country       |   | Entity |   | State |
| United States |    | ADT Holdings, Inc. |    | DE |
| United States |    | ADT LLC |    | DE |
| United States |    | ADT US Holdings, Inc. |    | DE |
| United States |   | Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC |   | DE |
| United States |   | Prime Security Services Holdings, LLC |   | DE |
| United States |   | The ADT Security Corporation |   | DE |
VESSEL OF WAR EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE (FOR USE WITH JP4, JPTS AND JET B)-

CASH SALES ONLY

(For use by purchasers of fuels for use as supplies for certain vessels or aircraft (section 4041(g) of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1954).)

The undersigned purchaser hereby certifies that he/she is the ______________________________ 

(owner, charterer, or authorized agent of owner or charterer) of 

________________________________________ (name of company and vessel) and that the fuel 

specified in the accompanying order, or as specified below or on the reverse side hereof, will be used 

only as fuel supplies for a vessel belonging to one of the following classes of vessels (including 

aircraft) to which section 4041(g) of the Internal Revenue Code applies: (Check class to which vessel 

belongs):

______ (1) Vessels (including aircraft) engaged in foreign trade.

______ (2) Vessels engaged in trade between the Atlantic and Pacific ports of the United States.

______ (3) Vessels (including aircraft) engaged in trade between the United States and any of its 

possessions.

______ (4) Vessels employed in the fisheries or whaling business.

____ (5) Vessels (including aircraft) of war of the United States or a foreign nation.

The undersigned understands that if the fuels are sold or used otherwise than as stated above and for a 

taxable purpose specified in section 4041 of the Internal Revenue Code, the undersigned will be 

liable for the tax upon such sale or use. It is also understood that this certificate may not be used in 

purchasing fuels, if such fuels are for use as fuels in pleasure vessels, or of any type of aircraft except 

(1) civil aircraft employed in foreign trade or trade between the United States and any of its 

possessions, and otherwise entitled to exemption, and (2) aircraft owned by the United States or any 

foreign country and constituting a part of the armed forces thereof. 

The undersigned understands that the fraudulent use of this certificate to secure exemption will subject 

the undersigned and all others making fraudulent use to a penalty equivalent to the amount of tax due 

on the sale of the fuel and, upon conviction, to a fine of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for 

not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. The purchaser also understands 

that it must be prepared to establish by satisfactory evidence the purpose for which the fuel purchased 

under this certificate was used.

(Signature)_____________________________________________________________________

(Address) ____________________________________________________________________

(Date) _____________________________________________________________________
No. 11-5665.

#### Michael Pulido, Petitioner v. Anthony Hedgpeth, Warden.

565 U.S. 918, 132 S. Ct. 338,

181 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5809.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 1007.
FEPAAS MOBILE WEB APP RELEASED!

During an event sponsors now have improved access through certain smart phones to the accountability

features of FEPAAS.

Release 1 capabilities and limitations include:

Capabilities:

A mobile phone web app accessible through your phone browser (no app to download-saves you

space)

Smartphone friendly user interface

Simple steps lead the user through accountability and location and contact update

Limitations:

Available to ONLY sponsors

Available to ONLY personnel affected by an event – can’t be used to update contact information

apart from an event

Designed for ONLY iPhone, Android, and certain touch-screen Blackberry phones (not iPad or nottouchscreen phones)

The next time you are affected by an accountability event, go to https://fepaas.whs.mil from your

smartphone for mobile FEPAAS access!

Watch for upcoming announcements of enhancements to the mobile web app.
DLA Distribution Warner Robins, Georgia

Mr. Joe Arnold

Director

Mr. Joe Arnold became the Director, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution 

Warner Robins, Georgia, April, 2020. Before his current position, Arnold 

worked for Disposition Services Mid-America which is comprised of 160 

Department of Defense civilians and military personnel at five hubs/facilities, 

one field site and 10 field activities dispersed over 11 states. Arnold also 

previously served as the Director, DLA Disposition Services Indo-Pacific 

where he oversaw disposal operations within the Indo-Pacific Command Area 

of Responsibility. The region consisted of 170 DoD and local national civilians 

and two military personnel at nine hubs/facilities throughout the Indo-Pacific 

region. 

Before his assignment with DLA Disposition Services, Arnold served as the Commander, DLA Indo-Pacific. 

Arnold served 25 years on active duty within the Army. He received a commission in May 1989 as a Distinguished 

Military Graduate from the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff. He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Criminal 

Justice, a master’s degree in Community Services from Michigan State University and a master’s degree in Strategic 

Studies from the U.S. Army War College.

His military deployments include Operation Desert Shield/ Desert Storm; Combined Joint Special Operations Task 

Force J4, Sarajevo; J1/J4 USARPAC Humanitarian Assistant Team, East Timor; CJSOTF Base Camp Commander, 

Operation Enduring Freedom - Philippines; C4 Log Planner, Coalition Forces Land Component Command, and 

Deputy G4, 3rd Infantry Division and Operation Iraqi Freedom.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40725

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ-SALAS, also known as Jose Bejarano,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1788-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis 

Rodriguez-Salas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Salas has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40725 Document: 00513385158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40725

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40725 Document: 00513385158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016