alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6126-4]


National Drinking Water Advisory Council Operator Certification 
Working Group; Notice of Open Meeting

    Under Section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Operator 
Certification Working Group of the National Drinking Water Advisory 
Council (NDWAC), established under the Safe Drinking Water Act, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. S300f et seq.), will be held on Thursday, August 13, 
1998, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Friday, August 14, 1998, from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Hotel Washington, 515 15th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC, 20004. The meeting is open to the public to observe, 
but due to past experience, seating will be limited.
    The primary purpose of this meeting is for the working group to 
discuss the public's comments that EPA received on the Public Review 
Draft Guidelines for the Certification and Recertification of Community 
and Nontransient Noncommunity Public Water Systems. Also, the working 
group members will develop recommendations on appropriate changes to 
the guidelines, based on the public comments, for transmittal to the 
NDWAC. Statements from the public will be taken at the end of the 
meeting if time allows.
    For more information, please contact Richard Naylor, Designated 
Federal Officer, Operator Certification Working Group, U.S. EPA, Office 
of Ground Water and Drinking Water (4606), 401 M Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20460. The telephone number is (202) 260-5135 and the e-
mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7b9b6aebbb8a5f9a5beb4bfb6a5b397b2a7b6bab6bebbf9b2a7b6f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7816190114170a560a111b10190a1c381d081915191114561d0819561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 14, 1998.
Charlene Shaw,
Designated Federal Officer, National Drinking Water Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 98-19260 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-33.

#### Allen Hassan, Petitioner v. Fred Morawcznski.

565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 245,

181 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5617.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 129.
Robert L. Mercadante 

is being inducted into the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Hall of Fame this thirtieth day of 

November for his outstanding mission support from 1963 through 2007. Throughout his illustrious 

44-year career with the Defense Logistics Agency, he has made many contributions that have had a 

lasting, positive impact on Troop Support’s business practices. Mr. Mercadante provided 

outstanding customer service by furnishing indispensable legal advice through critical times of 

transition and by defending vital agency programs. He was renowned for applying his sharp legal 

skills and vast knowledge to guide his clients. Significant issues he engaged in included: transition 

to the use of electronic contracting, the first industrial prime vendor program, commercial terms 

and conditions, and long-term best value contracts. In addition, Mr. Mercadante’s passion and 

talent for contract law particularly showcased itself in his extremely high success rate in defending 

protests. Mr. Mercadante constantly mentored and trained countless new attorneys and assisted 

many colleagues. His lasting, positive impact and outstanding customer service exemplify 

excellence and he is profoundly worthy of the DLA Troop Support Hall of Fame. In the words of a 

former colleague, Mr. Mercadante’s work is the “gold standard for DLA procurement attorneys.” 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/rmercadante.htm 1/20/2016
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00525-CR

ARTURO LUNA JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-5925-15-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 14, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-331-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, with an effective date August 1, 1998:

Second Revised Sheet No. 104
Third Revised Sheet No. 105
First Revised Sheet No. 173
First Revised Sheet No. 174
First Revised Sheet No. 178
Second Revised Sheet No. 179
First Revised Sheet No. 180
Original Sheet No. 204
Original Sheet No. 205

    Midwestern is submitting these revised tariff sheets in order to 
provide additional flexibility to its customers by allowing agency 
agreements under each of its rate schedules and allowing for an 
additional agency agreement for Electronic Data Interchange. Midwestern 
also proposes to revise the tariff sheets to correct certain minor 
misstatements and to update its agency tariff provisions. Midwestern 
requests an effective date of August 1, 1998.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Sheet, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18489 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-10806.

#### Christopher Raphael Woodberry, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 932, 132 S. Ct. 374,

181 L. Ed. 2d 237,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7048.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 325.
No. 11-6294.

#### Julian Olguin, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 439,

181 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7204.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 384.
No. 11-5089.

#### Sharu Bey, aka Jeffrey Lewis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 267,

181 L. Ed. 2d 157,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5237.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 570.
Title: Certificate of Declassification

Disposal Turn-In Document: Item Quantity:

NSNs or Item Descriptions:

Certification Statement:

I certify the items have been declassified, sanitized, and demilitarized. To the best of my 

knowledge, the items contain no sensitive data or markings. This certificate is signed and 

dated by the U.S. citizen (U.S. Government employee or defense contractor personnel) 

who actually performed or witnessed the declassification.

Signature: Date

Printed Name and Grade or Rank: 

Title and Activity: 

Phone and Facsimile Numbers: 

Mailing and E-mail Addresses:
No. 11-6359.

#### Demorris Tyrese Allen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 971, 132 S. Ct. 467,

181 L. Ed. 2d 309,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7504.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 285.
No. 10-10820.

#### Bradley Garner, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 176,

181 L. Ed. 2d 87,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6456.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 584.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 31, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 31, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0047. THEO LAMBROS v. MARY LAMBROS, BY AND THROUGH MICHAEL 

T. SMITH, AS CONSERVATOR.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

09A09471
ROBERT P. APELIAN 

Is posthumously inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this third day of 

June 1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as Associate Counsel - and for his 

continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DPSC – from 1972 to 1988. Mr. 

Apelian, an exceptional advocate, was personally responsible for an unprecedented number of 

favorable decisions in bid protest cases before the General Accounting Office. Many decisions were 

instrumental in furthering the Agency’s mission by upholding contracts that were vital in fulfilling 

the critical requirement of DPSC’s customers. In addition, many of his other cases stand as 

valuable precedent in Government Contract law. Mr. Apelian also advised and counseled many new 

attorneys and procurement personnel throughout the Center. His dedication and devotion laid a 

solid foundation for his protégés becoming an integral part of DPSC’s ongoing success story. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/apelian.htm 1/21/2016
No. 11-230.

#### Kien-Peng Ciu and Suryani Jung, Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 945, 132 S. Ct. 423,

181 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7417.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 36.
PAGE NO.

DUNNAGE AND FABRICATION PRODUCTION CONTROL REGISTER

DLA FORM 163, SEP 86 (EG) EDITION OF NOV 63 IS OBSOLETE. PDF (DLA)

WORK ORDER

NUMBER

DATE

RECEIVED

DATE

REQUIRED

SHIP

TO

DATE

COMPLETED ITEM REQUESTED REIMBURSE QUANTITY MANHOURS

TOTAL COST

FROM

DLA FORM 161
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4.
2 ... S ee I

n re M cA f

ee , 5 3 S .W .3 d 7 1 5 , 7 1 8 (T e x . A p p .— H o u s to n [1 s t D i s t.] 200 1, or i g. proc ee di ng) ( pr ovi di ng t hatap pl i ca nt m ay se ek11. 07 m and am us re l i e f o n l y fro m C o u rt o f C ri m i n a l A p p e a l s ).



## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 48 8- CV I N R E R ONAL D MI CH AE L HI L L R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is oft he opi ni on t hati t ha s no j ur i sd i ct i on ov ert he r el i efr equ es t ed. Tex . Code Cr i m . Pr oc . Ann . a r t . 11. 07, § 5 ( Ver no n Sup p. 2008 ) ; Tex. G ov’ t Code Ann. 2 § 22. 221 ( V er non 2004) . A cc or di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f orw r i t ofm and am us i s di sm i ss ed. P E R CU R I AM
PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N an d M C C O Y, JJ. DEL I VERE D: J a nu a r y 28, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-203-000 and RP 98-203-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

July 13, 1998.
    In the Commission's order issued on May 28, 1998, the Commission 
directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised 
by the filing.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on 
Wednesday, July 15, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., in Hearing Room 6, at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19090 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF REGISTRANT
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
_________________________________________
 FIRST:
 SECOND:
 THIRD:
  FOURTH:
  FIFTH:
 NAME
    
    MAILING ADDRESSG. Robert Lucas II
    
    41 South High StreetColumbus, Ohio 43215
  1




---



##### 



SIXTH:
 SEVENTH:
  EIGHTH:
  NINTH:
 TENTH:
     2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



ELEVENTH:
 TWELFTH:
 THIRTEENTH:
 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               51613 
<DEPOSITS>                                       0
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             23 
<LONG-TERM>                                  50000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    1590 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               51613 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              2220 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2154 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      66 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERIK REDEEMER,

Appellant,

v.

GREGG ROSSMAN,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1119

[July 8, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John Thomas Luzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-9031 09.

Erik Redeemer, Pollock, Louisiana, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David J. Glantzi, 

Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

GROSS, J.

We affirm the order dismissing a civil tort complaint against a 

prosecutor upon prosecutorial immunity grounds.

Almost every court that has considered the prosecutorial conduct at 

issue in this case “has determined that prosecutors are entitled to absolute 

immunity from suits . . . claiming that the plaintiff’s constitutional rights 

were violated as a result of the initiation of an extradition process.” Uribe 

v. Cohen, 3:04 CV 1723 CFD, 2006 WL 2349567, at *3 (D. Conn. Aug. 3, 

2006) (footnote omitted); see, e.g., Larsen v. Early, 842 F. Supp. 1310, 

1313 (D. Colo. 1994) (prosecutor entitled to absolute immunity since

“extradition is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal 

process” (internal quotation omitted)); Cleary v. Andersen, 423 F. Supp. 

745, 748 (D. Neb. 1976) (“[I]t is apparent that the proper discharge of the 

prosecutor’s duties in the criminal justice system requires that he be 

accorded unhampered discretion in deciding when to seek the extradition 

of an individual.”); Rivera v. Algarin, 350 Fed. Appx. 703, 708 (3d Cir. 

2009) (“Ricca’s efforts to initiate extradition proceedings against Rivera are 

prosecutorial in nature and entitle her to immunity from liability.”); Cross 

v. Meisel, 720 F. Supp. 486, 489 (E.D. Pa. 1989); Arebaugh v. Dalton, 600 
- 2 -

F. Supp. 1345, 1351 (E.D. Va. 1985); Brooks v. Fitch, 534 F. Supp. 129, 

132 (D.N.J 1981) (“[T]he decisions to extradite and to issue an arrest 

warrant fall within the scope of absolute immunity.”). The justification is 

obvious considering the purpose of extradition. As the federal Fourth 

Circuit Court of Appeals explained in Dababnah v. Keller-Burnside, 208 

F.3d 467, 472 (4th Cir. 2000), “[i]nsuring that a defendant is present both 

for trial and for punishment is critical to a prosecutor’s discharge of her 

duties . . . . Indeed, if a convicted defendant is not available for 

punishment, the prosecution itself would be rendered pointless.”

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., and STEVENSON, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3245 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New 

Harmony River Bridge Authority and the New Harmony 

and Wabash River Bridge Authority, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 3245 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore the Harmony 

3 Way Bridge Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF BRIDGE AND LAND. 

5 Notwithstanding any provision of the Act of April 12, 

6 1941 (55 Stat. 140, chapter 71), not later than 180 days 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act, the White County 

8 Bridge Commission shall convey, without consideration, to 

9 the New Harmony River Bridge Authority and the New 

10 Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, any and 

11 all right, title, and interest of such Commission in and 

12 to the bridge across the Wabash River at or near New 

13 Harmony, Indiana, in the approaches thereto, and in land 

14 underneath or adjacent to such bridge and its approaches. 

15 SEC. 3. REPEAL. 

16 The Act of April 12, 1941 (55 Stat. 140, chapter 71) 

17 is repealed effective on the date that the White County 

18 Bridge Commission completes the conveyance described in 

19 section 2. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-10825.

#### Salvatore Stabile, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 942, 132 S. Ct. 399,

181 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7288.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 219.
No. 11-69.

#### Thomas Douglas Arthur, Petitioner v. Alabama.

565 U.S. 963, 132 S. Ct. 453,

181 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7538.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 71 So. 3d 733.