alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AVIATION

6090 STRATHMORE ROAD

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23237

Page 1 of 2

IN REPLY

REFER TO DLA Aviation SBO

Source Approval Requests

If there is an open solicitation for a national stock number for which you want to submit a 

SAR, please submit it directly to the buyer noted on the solicitation. (NOTE: This applies to

open solicitations only).

SAR’s will not be evaluated for items that are already designated as fully competitive such

as those items coded AMSC “G” or “T” and described by drawings and specifications.

If you are submitting a SAR for a NSN with no open solicitation we are no longer accepting

CDs by mail. SARs must be submitted using the DoD SAFE file transmission site, 

https://safe.apps.mil/. The new process streamlines processing with electronic 

transmission and eliminates the need for multiple mailings of CDs.

To submit your SAR please send an email to: dlaavnsmallbus@dla.mil, subject "request a 

SAR drop off" with the information below in the body. After we receive your email

request a "request for drop off" will be returned, where you can download your file.

Include CAGE code, the NSN and the email address where you want to receive the link.

Include in the body:

Category X (1-4) SAR package

RPPOB Program: Yes or No

NSN: ####-##-###-####

CAGE: 13873

POC: supplieremail@supplier.com

Phone: 555-123-1234

For guidance on completing a SAR package please review the Source Approval Handbook and 

the Source Approval Request (SAR) Guide.

SARs may not be processed if it is determined that the SAR is not cost effective due to low

item demand. Please review the DLA Supplier Requirements Visibility Application:

https://www.dibbs.bsm.dla.mil/ra/srva/default.aspx for estimated forecasting 

requirements before submitting a SAR.

If you would like to see how many services use the NSN you can download PUB LOG FLIS 

to see how many services use the item and who approved sources are. You can download 

the PUB LOG FLIS using the instructions at: FLISSearchDownloadInstructions.pdf
The PUB LOG FLIS executable file connects to a secured server that stores and returns data

with each query. This data is updated weekly. Once in the database, put in the NSN, hit 

Search. Under the “Management” tab, you will see the MOE code for the number of ESAs 

involved.

The DLA Aviation Replenishment Parts Purchase or Borrow (RPPOB) program that allows 

contractors to purchase, borrow, or visually inspect parts is now processing SARs through 

this process. If you are submitting a SAR for this program, please specify in your “Request 

a SAR drop off” email that it is for the RPPOB program in the subject line and body. This 

way it will get routed to the correct team to be worked.

The review process can take over 180 days from the date the SAR is received by DLA

Aviation. Once a decision is made, you will receive a formal notification letter advising 

you of the results.

If you have any questions, please email the DLA Aviation SAR analyst at

dlaavnsmallbus@dla.mil.
##### 



EXHIBIT 24
 
 
 RE:
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Commission File No. 1-6695
1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K
   Date
    
    
    
    Date/s/ Darrell Webb
    
    April 19, 2007
    
    /s/ Patricia Morrison
    
    April 19, 2007Darrell Webb
    
    
    
    Patricia Morrison/s/ James Kerr
    
    April 19, 2007
    
    /s/ Frank Newman
    
    April 19, 2007James Kerr
    
    
    
    Frank Newman/s/ Scott Cowen
    
    April 19, 2007
    
    /s/ Beryl Raff
    
    April 19, 2007Scott Cowen
    
    
    
    Beryl Raff/s/ Ira Gumberg
    
    April 19, 2007
    
    /s/ Gregg Searle
    
    April 19, 2007Ira Gumberg
    
    
    
    Gregg Searle/s/ Alan Rosskamm
    
    April 19, 2007
    
    /s/ Tracey T. Travis
    
    April 19, 2007Alan Rosskamm
    
    
    
    Tracey T. Travis
No. 11-5512.

#### Wilda Eugene Roberts, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 322,

181 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6455.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 893.
No. 10-11046.

#### Antoine McSwain, Petitioner v. Indiana.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 207,

181 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6475.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.

Same case below, 950 N.E.2d 1203.
July 27 , 2015

Mr. Daniel Bess

4116 Potts Creek Road

Covington, VA 24426

Dear Mr . Bess :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 2 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 2691 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent o f the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the e xemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your re quest any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen an d

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<page>            EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  August 16, 2004       /s/Kevin Perry
                                Kevin Perry
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Demeter Management Corporation,
                                general partner of the registrant
```

[Federal Register: September 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 170)]
[Notices]               
[Page 53947]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02se10-30]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, September 10, 2010; 11:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: Via Teleconference, Public Dial In: 1-800-597-7623, Conference 
ID  97796915.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing 
Report on Health Care Disparities.
     New Black Panther Party Enforcement Project--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
     Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College Admissions 
Project--Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in 
closed session.
     Timeline for Briefing Report on English-Only in the 
Workplace.
III. State Advisory Committee Issues
     Arkansas SAC.
     Wyoming SAC.
IV. Approval of August 13 Meeting Minutes
V. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-22112 Filed 8-31-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
No. 11-6003.

#### Kevin L. Hite, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 361,

181 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6773.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 546.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39554-39555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 USC Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Involuntary Child and Spousal Support Allotments of NOAA 
Corps Officers.
    Agency Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0242.

[[Page 39555]]

    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 5 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 5.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
    Needs and Uses: Spouses, ex-spouses, or children of active-duty 
NOAA Corps officers may seek of obtain involuntary deductions of 
allotments from an officer's pay if the officer has failed to make 
periodic payments under a support order. To obtain such an allotment, a 
certified copy of the support order and related information must be 
provided.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19601 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1060
L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK SIMMONS; WEICHERT REALTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00840) Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 24, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lawrence Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ruther’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Simmons , No. 3:06-cv-00840 (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Able Energy, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy Harrington,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 22, 2004



                               /S/ TIMOTHY HARRINGTON
                               ----------------------
                               NAME: TIMOTHY HARRINGTON
                               TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50584

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISIDRO CUAUTLE-TAPIA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-01-CR-665-1-OG

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Isidro Cuautle-Tapia appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Cuautle-Tapia contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Cuautle-Tapia maintains that he

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry
No. 02-50584

-2-

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Cuautle-Tapia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
No. 11-6141.

#### Debra Feldman, Petitioner v. Twentieth Century Fox, et al.

565 U.S. 986, 132 S. Ct. 514,

181 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7847.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 10453 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:15

- cr - 00362

- JDW

- AEP

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MIGUEL RAYO

- CAMACHO, SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez

- Valdez, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 28, 2016) Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 1 of 22 Before TJOFLAT , HULL and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Aliza Hochman Bloom , appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo

- Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel = s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel = s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Rayo

- Camacho’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2
No. 11-5763.

#### Demetrious Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 346,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6852.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 405.
No. 11-5157.

#### Rufus Tyrone Nelson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 275,

181 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5559.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 239.
NANCY POPSON 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twentieth day of January 

1999 for her extraordinary leadership and support as a Supervisory Equipment Manager (General) 

in our Technical Operations Directorate and for her continuous outstanding mission support 

throughout her tenure at DISC from 1979 to 1994. Ms. Popson was known for her self motivation 

and determination, and had the ability to highly motivate others. She was the pioneer in an 

uncharted career series for women. Due to her superb leadership, she was tasked with a threeyear project of restructuring the Technical Data Management Division. She played a very major role 

in developing and installing the automated systems we now have. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/popson.htm 1/21/2016