[Cite as In re Estate of Klies, 2011-Ohio-4569.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: JUDGES: 

 Hon. Scott Gwin, P.J. 

GERALD D. KLIES, DECEASED. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. 

 Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. 

 

 Case No. 11CA000005 

 

 O P I N I O N

 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, 

Probate Division, Case No. 050768 

 

JUDGMENT: Affirmed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 9, 2011 

APPEARANCES: 

For Plaintiff-Appellant For Defendant-Appellee 

RUSSELL H. BOOTH, JR. WILLIAM H. FERGUSON 

745 Steubenville Avenue 111 North 7th Street 

Cambridge, OH 43725 Cambridge, OH 43725 

 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000005 2 

Farmer, J. 

{¶1} On September 29, 2009, Gerald Klies passed away. Co-administrators of 

the estate were the decedent's only children, appellant, Cristal White, and appellee, 

Aaron Klies. At the time of his passing, appellant owned real property in Madison 

Township. 

{¶2} On April 6, 2010, the trial court issued a Certificate of Transfer on the 

subject property. The Certificate of Transfer transferred a one-half interest to appellant 

and a one-half interest to appellee. 

{¶3} On April 9, 2010, appellant and her husband executed a quit claim deed of 

their share of the property to appellee, apparently so appellee could obtain a loan to pay 

off the estate debts. Thereafter, appellee sold the property. A dispute arose between 

the parties over the proceeds from the sale. 

{¶4} On December 14, 2010, appellant filed a motion for a hearing on the 

distribution of assets. A hearing was held on January 26, 2011. At the end of the 

hearing, appellee moved for a directed verdict as the estate had been fully 

administered. By judgment entry filed February 7, 2011, the trial court found the estate 

was fully administered and granted appellee's motion. 

{¶5} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for 

consideration. Assignment of error is as follows: 

I 

{¶6} "THE COURT ERRED IN ORDERS (1) AND (4)." 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000005 3 

I 

{¶7} Appellant claims the trial court erred in finding the estate was fully 

administered and in granting appellee's motion for a directed verdict. We disagree. 

{¶8} In her motion filed December 14, 2010, appellant asked the trial court to 

rule on the distribution of assets. It was appellant's position that the estate could not be 

closed because appellee had failed to abide by a separate agreement executed 

between the two co-administrators outside of the estate proceedings regarding the 

proceeds from the sale of the property pursuant to the Certificate of Transfer dated April 

6, 2010. Appellant claims the trial court failed to rule on her request. 

{¶9} A motion for a directed verdict is to be granted when, construing the 

evidence most strongly in favor of the party opposing the motion, the trial court finds 

that reasonable minds could come to only one conclusion and that conclusion is 

adverse to such party. Civ.R. 50(4); Crawford v. Halkovics (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 184. A 

motion for a directed verdict tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence rather than its 

weight or the credibility of the witnesses. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co. (1982), 69 

Ohio St.2d 66. Since a directed verdict presents a question of law, an appellate court 

conducts a de novo review of the trial court's judgment. Howell v. Dayton Power and 

Light Co. (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 6. 

{¶10} Appellant does not challenge the trial court's findings of fact, but disputes 

the trial court's granting of the directed verdict. 

{¶11} The transfer of the real property at issue was accomplished by operation 

of law pursuant to R.C. 2105.06, 2105.061, and 2113.61. Once the Certificate of 

Transfer was signed and filed, the distribution of the assets was a fait accompli, and 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000005 4 

was beyond the jurisdiction of the estate administrators. Appellant's motion did not 

request the trial court to void the Certificate of Transfer, but requested that the trial court 

distribute the assets pursuant to the parties' outside agreement over the property. 

{¶12} Appellant testified that she and her husband executed a quit claim deed to 

the property to appellee so appellee could obtain a loan to pay off the estate's debts. T. 

at 21, 26. This was not necessary because additional estate assets were discovered 

(see, Report of Newly Discovered Assets filed June 3, 2010), and appellee sold off 

timber from the property to pay off the debts and then split the remainder with appellant. 

T. at 13, 24. In fact, on June 3, 2010, the parties signed an application to distribute inkind wherein the parties agreed to "have consented to the distribution as proposed in 

the within schedule." Appellee sold the property and made appellant a verbal offer to 

pay her $20,000.00 which she rejected. T. at 24, 27. 

{¶13} The testimony during the hearing on the distribution of assets was that 

there were sufficient funds in the attorney trust account to pay the attorney fees and 

costs as all bills had been paid. T. at 12. 

{¶14} In its judgment entry filed February 7, 2011, the trial court declined to 

adjust the final distribution of the assets apart from what was required by R.C. 2105.06, 

thereby denying appellant's motion: 

{¶15} "1. Based upon the evidence presented and the representations of 

counsel, this Court finds that the Estate of Gerald D. Klies, Case No. 050768, has been 

fully administered. 

{¶16} "2. Any further litigation between the heirs may be in any Court of 

competent jurisdiction and is not an expense of the estate. 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000005 5 

{¶17} "3. The counsel for the estate is to make his final distributions to pay the 

attorney fees, court costs and obtain any signatures of the co-administrators on the final 

account. This Entry may be substituted for any missing signatures. 

{¶18} "4. The Estate is fully administered and completed; Motion Granted. 

{¶19} "5. Costs are to be paid from the Estate for the hearing." 

{¶20} If appellant had challenged appellee relative to his fiduciary capacity, the 

matter clearly would have been within the trial court's jurisdiction; however, appellant did 

not so challenge the Certificate of Transfer and appellee's promises to her. Instead, 

appellant sought to shortcut the legal process of initiating a civil action for fraud. 

{¶21} Upon review, we find the trial court did not err in finding the estate had 

been fully administered and in granting appellee's motion for a directed verdict. 

{¶22} The sole assignment of error is denied. 

{¶23} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Guernsey County, Ohio, 

Probate Division is hereby affirmed. 

By Farmer, J. 

Gwin, P.J. and 

Edwards, J. concur. 

 _s/ Sheila G. Farmer__________________ 

 _s/ W. Scott Gwin___________________ 

 _s/ Julie A. Edwards__________________ 

 JUDGES 

SGF/sg 818 
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: : 

 : 

GERALD D. KLIES, DECEASED : JUDGMENT ENTRY 

 : 

 : 

 : 

 : CASE NO. 11CA000005 

 

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the 

judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Guernsey County, Ohio, Probate Division is 

affirmed. Costs to appellant. 

 _s/ Sheila G. Farmer__________________ 

 _s/ W. Scott Gwin___________________ 

 _s/ Julie A. Edwards__________________ 

 JUDGES