alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 6, 2022 DLA-SM-22-3214

DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS ANNOUNCES

BOA SALES FOR May 2022

Fort Belvoir, VA - The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials today announced sales made 

under the following Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) during May 2022.

SOLICITATION:

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001

UNIT QUANTITY 

SOLD

APPROX 

VALUE

COMPANY

Ferrochrome Amendment 001 LC ST

HC ST

1000 $4.18 M Glencore Ltd

Veritas Alloys & 

Metals

Chromium Metal Amendment 001 ST NO 

SALES

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates 

Amendment 001

Lbs W 199,694 $3.26 M Global Tungsten & 

Powders Corp

Wogen Resources 

Limited

Zinc Amendment 001 Lbs

NO

SALES

Tin Amendment 001 MT NO

SALES

 *If no company name appears, the single awardee name has been withheld
M14007

Part II, Section A.2 and A.3 – Industrial Sites Controlled by Submitter

Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release and Disposal Page 1 of 1

SiVance LLC

The PMN substance will be manufactured at SiVance LLC. Because it is used only as a site-limited 

intermediate, exposure of workers may occur only during the manufacturing process.

Manufacture Exposure

During manufacture, workers may be exposed while sampling (worker activity A), testing (worker 

activity B) and transferring (worker activity C & D). There is expected to be one operator sampling the 

reaction vessel, working 30 minutes, 8 times per year, one operator analyzing the PMN substance, 

working 30 minutes, 8 times per year, one operator transferring the PMN substance for redistillation, 

working 1 hour, 8 times per year, and one operator transferring the PMN substance for next reaction 

step, working 1 hour, 8 times per year.

The PMN substance will be manufactured in 2-batch campaigns, 4 times per year. The empty reactor 

vessel is washed with xylenes, gravity drained and sent to an off-site incineration facility (Release 1).

The PMN substance will be transferred from a portable holding tank to a reactor vessel for use in a 

subsequent reaction step. The empty portable holding tank is washed with xylenes, which is collected 

and sent to an off-site incineration facility (Release 2). The portable holding tank is then reused in the 

same process.

Worker Activity A

Sample PMN substance from reaction 

vessel.

Worker Activity B

Analyze PMN substance from reaction 

vessel.

Worker Activity C

Transfer of PMN substance to reactor 

vessel for redistillation.

Worker Activity D

Transfer of PMN substance to and 

from portable holding tank.

Release 1

The PMN substance will be manufactured 

in 2-batch campaigns, 4 times per year. 

The empty reactor vessel is washed with 

xylenes, gravity drained and sent to an offsite incineration facility.

Release 2

The PMN substance will be transferred to 

and from a portable holding tank to a 

reactor vessel for use in a subsequent 

reaction step. 

The empty portable holding tank is washed 

with xylenes, which is collected and sent 

to an off-site incineration facility. The 

portable holding tank is then reused in the 

same process.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL
No. 10-1532.

#### Daphne Noel Hoge, Petitioner v. Colorado.

565 U.S. 827, 132 S. Ct. 119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5218.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Colorado, Adams County, denied.
No. 11-5040.

#### Kenneth Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 262,

181 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5406.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Chromium Metal Offering

Item # Location Drums Origin

Unit of Measure................... Pounds Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

November 8, 2021

November 9, 2021

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Basic Ordering Agreement... Chromium Metal Date of Posting...................

Commodity.................................Chromium Metal Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Type Lot # Quantity Offered/Minimum Bid

Totals

Net Weight ST

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

*

All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

82.8 ST 165,607 LBs

0269a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 013B 40 HOLLAND 9.063 ST 18,126.8 LBs

0274a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.74 ST 13,477 LBs

0274b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.74 ST 13,481 LBs

0274c Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.74 ST 13,477 LBs

0274d Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.75 ST 13,496 LBs

0274e Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.73 ST 13,469 LBs

0348a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 14-A 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20,020 LBs

0348b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 14-A 28 10.01 ST 20,020 LBs

0348c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 14-A 28 10.01 ST 20,020 LBs

0348d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 14-A 28 10.01 ST 20,020 LBs

DOMESTIC 

DOMESTIC 

DOMESTIC
# C_2014024EN.01003002.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/30

---

Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)

(Case T-598/13)

2014/C 24/55

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sanctuary Brands LLC (New Canaan, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Richter International Ltd (Scarborough, Canada)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2013 given in Case R 1115/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2013 given in Case R 1115/2012-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘TAILORBYRD’ for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark application No 9 325 549

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Non-registered figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘TAILORBYRD’, non-registered word mark and trade name ‘TAILORBYRD’ and the company name ‘Tailorbyrd, LLC’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom for ‘clothing, shirts’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 11-5530.

#### Shareef Evans, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 325,

181 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6439.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 16 N.Y.3d 571, 925 N.Y.S.2d 366, 949 N.E.2d 457.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O

. P D

- 0 0 5 1

- 1 4

H E N R Y T A Y L O R , J R

. , A p p e l l a n t

v .

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

F R O M T H E S I X T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

G R E G G C O U N T Y

J O H N S O N , J

. , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n .

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

All sides seem to ag ree that appellant is monumentally inept at business. The ev i d en ce

establishes that he is also monumentally inept at installing signs. The trouble seems to have started

when his fathe r “steppe d out” of the business, leaving appellant to both run the business side and the

installation side unsupervised. Appellant has proved h i m s el f to be completely unable to perf orm

either task. But that is not a crime. This is a contra ct dispute, and it should be left to the civil courts

to resolve it. I

respe ctfully

dissent.

Filed: De cembe r 10, 2014 Publis h
No. 10-9621.

#### Christopher C. Hayes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 829, 132 S. Ct. 125,

181 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5394.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*48Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 277.
II

Ridan Inves Respondent 

### SERVED: October 12, 2016 U.S. DEPART:rvffiNT OF**TRANSPCS~'Jfili** 

### OFFICE OF

# HEARINGERANSPORTA\~ WASHINGTON, DCzatt 

## 0 .

. • CT 13 P 11:**~Jb** ) ) ) ) ) 

## DOCKET OPERATIONS Docket No. FAA-2013-1082 Case No. 201280700133

NOTICE OFHEARING Pursuantt 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(1) and§ 13.221, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 

### Locati n a. Th hearing will be held atthe 

### Ronald Reagan FederalBuilding and U.S. Co rtbouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701. 1 b. Bri fcases, purses, packages, and other items will be subjectto searchupon entryto. the building. All individuals must present a valid government-issued J.D. to enter. 

### 2. Date a. Th hearing will begin on

### January24, 2017. b. Th courtroom is reservedthrough January 26, 2017. 

### 3. Time a. Th hearing will begin at 

### 9:00a.m. local time and endby 4:00p.m. each day. b. Th parties shall vacate the courthouse by 5:00p.m. each day.

1 As ofthe date this notice, a courtroom has not yetbeen assigned. Parties should checkthe Court Calendar on the day ofthe he ing for the exact courtroom or check with the Clerk's Office.SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviati n Administration 800 Independe ce Avenue, S.W. Washington, D 20591 Attention: earing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright uilding-· Suite 2W10002
ONE COPY 

### Lawrence M. urek, 

### Respondent's Counsel 550 North Par enter Drive, Suite 204 SantaAna, CA 92705 TEL: 714-56 -9033 FAX: 714-56 -1685 Glenn H. Bro •

### Complainant's Counsel Enforcement D vision, Western Team Federal Aviati n Administration 222 W. 7th Ave ue, Box 14 Anchorage, A 99513-7587 TEL: 907-27 -5271 FAX: 907-27 -2800 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHeari gs, M-20 U.S. Departme t 

### ofTransportation 1200 New Jers y Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D 20590 TEL: 202-36 -5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-36 -7536 DocketNo. FAA-2013-1082 (Civil Penalty Action)

2 Service was by .S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Adminis ation, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attent on: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3172 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3172

 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any inclined sleeper 
                  for infants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2019

 Mr. Cardenas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any inclined sleeper 
                  for infants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Sleep Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF INCLINED SLEEPERS FOR INFANTS.

    (a) Prohibition on the Sale of Inclined Sleepers for Infants.--
Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, it shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture for sale, 
offer for sale, distribute in commerce, or import into the United 
States any inclined sleeper for infants.
    (b) Treatment of Violation.--A violation of subsection (a) shall be 
treated as a violation of section 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1)).
    (c) Inclined Sleeper for Infants Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``inclined sleeper for infants'' means a product with an inclined 
sleep surface greater than ten degrees that is intended, marketed, or 
designed to provide sleeping accommodations for an infant up to one 
year old.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM. ORDER Appellate case name The City.of Houston v. Atser, L.P 

### Appellate case number: 01-1.0-00240-CV Trial court case number: 2008-48039 Trial court: 

### 334th District Court, Harris Cnty., Tex. On October 29, 2012, Appellant filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered that Appellee’s response, if any, xs due Monday, December 3, 2012.We request that, in the response, if any, Appellee address the impact of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Rusk State Hospital v. Black on the analysis of our appellate jurisdiction. See Rusk State Hospital v. Black, No. 10-0548, 2012 WL 3800218, at *6 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2012) ("We hold that if immunity as first asserted on interlocutory appeal,. [Civil Practice and Remedies Code]. section 51.014(a) does not preclude the appellate court from having to consider the issue at the outset in order to determine whether it has jurisdiction to address the merits."). 

### 2012. It is furthered ordered that Appellant’s reply, if any, is due Monday, December 10, It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:/s/Evelyn V. Keyes

IEI Acting individually [] Acting for the Court 

### Date November 21, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Meeting of the Delta Region Preservation Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Meeting of the Delta Preservation Commission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Delta Region Preservation 
Commission will be held at the following place and time.

DATES: Wednesday, August 5, 1998 at 7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Environmental Education 
Center in the Barataria Preserve Unit of Jean Lafitte National 
Historical Park and Preserve, 7400 Highway 45, Marrero, Louisiana 
70072.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons wishing further information 
concerning this meeting, or who wish to submit written statements, may 
contact Geraldine Smith, Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National 
Historical Park and Preserve, 365 Canal Street, Suite 2400, New 
Orleans, Louisiana 70130-1142, telephone (504) 589-3882, extension 108.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delta Region Preservation Commission was 
established pursuant to Section 907 of Public Law 95-625 (16 U.S.C. 
230f), as amended, to advise the Secretary of the Interior in the 
selection of sites for inclusion in Jean Lafitte National Historical 
Park and Preserve, and in the implementation and development of a 
general management plan and of a comprehensive interpretive program of 
the natural, historic, and cultural resources of the region.
    The matters to be discussed at this meeting include:

--Old Business
--General Park Update

    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement concerning matters to be 
discussed with the Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National Historical 
Park and Preserve.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection four 
weeks after the meeting at the headquarters office of Jean Lafitte 
National Historical Park and Preserve.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Daniel W. Brown,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 98-19150 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
No. 10-11191.

#### Richard Hamilton, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 226,

181 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6614,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 216.
## The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104 - 3741 ASSISTANT CLERK TELEPHONE 334 - 229 - 0733 August 30, 2024 CL - 2023 - 0890 J.E.P. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from Madison Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 643.04). CL - 2023 - 0891 J.E.P. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from Madison Juvenile Court: JU - 22 - 389.03). CL - 2023 - 0918 H.D.B. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from Madison Juvenile Court: JU - 22 - 389.03). CL - 2023 - 0919 H.D.B. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from Madison Juvenile Court: JU - 19 - 643.04). ORDER You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on rehearing. Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur. Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
H. R. 3305 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2509 George 

Mason Drive in Virginia Beach, Virginia, as the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RYAN KEITH COX POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2509 George Mason Drive in Virginia Beach, 

Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 10-10469.

#### James Anthony Davis, Petitioner v. Bill Donat, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6303.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10807.

#### Anthony A. Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 175,

181 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5963.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 405.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PocketSpec Technologies Inc. (the
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Cynthia Kettl, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

DECEMBER 20, 2004

                                                     By: /s/  Cynthia Kettl
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

s0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148356 & (14)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICH IGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148356

COA: 316725

Wayne CC: 07

- 024398

- FC

SEAN DARNELL DANIELS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29 , 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to expand the record and for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
Did you know that some queso

fresco can make you sick? 

Protect your family!
 

Always buy queso fresco that 

is refrigerated and made with 

pasteurized milk. 

Always buy queso fresco in 

the store.	 Also, buy queso 

fresco that has a label. 

Never buy queso 

fresco from the 

street! 

For more information go to: 

http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/specific-foods/listeria-and-food.html

or call:
No. 10-10776.

#### Chester Eugene Downing, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 170,

181 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6186.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 220.