alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-9544.

No. 10-9545.

No. 10-9583.

#### Sameena Ali, Petitioner v. United States. Mirza Ali, Petitioner v. United States. Keith W. Griffen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 930, 132 S. Ct. 370,

181 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7084.

October 3, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 620 F.3d 1062.
No. 11-5621.

#### Antonio Kendrick, Petitioner v. Marcus Hardy, Warden.

565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 406,

181 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7412.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-34.

#### Edward H. Flint, Petitioner v. Coach House, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 245,

181 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5283.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, May 04, 2018*

*Change 10*

**AP7.29 APPENDIX 7.29**

**STOCK READINESS RELEVANT DATA ELEMENTS**

AP7.29.1.  GENERAL

	AP7.29.1.1.  This appendix provides a consolidated reference resource for data elements and their associated code sets applicable to Stock Screening Request and Storage Quality Control Report (SQCR) submissions and responses.  These data elements are applicable in all Stock Screening Requests and SQCR processing under the DLMS.  The following data elements are included in this appendix.  Within the context of stock readiness procedures, these data elements may be recognized by abbreviated names as indicated.

· Shipping, Packaging, and Storage Discrepancy Code.  Also referred to as Discrepancy Code.

· SDR or SQCR Requested Action Code.  Also referred to as Action Code.

· Discrepancy Status or Disposition (Reply) Code.  Also referred to as Reply Code.

· Discrepancy Report Document Type Code.  Also referred to as Document Type.

AP7.29.2.  IN-STORAGE DISCREPANCY CODES.  The following codes are used to provide a description of the discrepant condition.  Up to two discrepancy codes may be used on a single report.  

AP7.29.3.  SQCR REQUESTED ACTION CODES.  The Requested Action Code is used to provide a description of the action requested by the initiator of the SQCR.  Only one action code may be used per SQCR under DLMS.  

AP7.29.4.  DISCREPANCY STATUS OR DISPOSITION (REPLY) CODES.  Action activities use the Discrepancy Status or Disposition (Reply) Codes to codify a response to an SQCR.  This data element may be referred to as a Reply Code.  Up to two reply codes may be used on a single SQCR reply to provide complete disposition instructions and additional information as needed.  WebSQCR and WebSS may also use reply codes on automatic reject replies for transactions that fail edit criteria.  System design should accommodate clear text for ease of use and interpretation.  The following Reply Codes may be used on the SQCR.

AP7.29.5.  DISCREPANCY REPORT DOCUMENT TYPE CODES.  The following codes are used to identify report categories for appropriate automated processing.

AP7.29-2	APPENDIX 7.29
DLA Distribution Barstow, California

Mr. Adam J. Smith

Director

Adam J. Smith became the new director of Defense Logistics Agency 

Distribution Barstow, California, Aug. 23.

As a retired Army Sgt. Maj., Smith has over 30 years of Defense Department 

experience in Army logistics. Smith entered military service in 1989 as an 

infantryman missile gunner at Fort Moore, Georgia. He transitioned into the 

logistics field in 1992 as a Sgt. and has since served at every level of logistics.

Smith holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of 

Maryland and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy in 

Fort Bliss, Texas.

Throughout both his military and civilian careers, Smith has held numerous 

positions of leadership and has deployed four times to Iraq and Afghanistan in both military and civilian capacities.

Smith previously served as the DLA Energy liaison officer to the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, from 

June 2020 to June 2021. He was responsible for coordinating with senior U.S. Embassy officials, the Afghanistan 

Ministry of Finance, Afghan Customs Department, U.S. Forces Afghanistan, Resolute Support Headquarters and 

the primary fuel contractors importing fuel to Afghanistan. Prior to that, he worked as a logistics management 

specialist planner in the DLA Energy Operations & Plans office at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

Smith’s military awards and decorations include Legion of Merit, the Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service 

Commendation Medal (with oak leaf cluster), Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal (with bronze 

star), Overseas Service Ribbon, Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (numeral 5), 

Joint Meritorious Unit Award, Unit Citation and NATO Medal (second award), Superior Civilian Service Award, 

Department of State Meritorious Honor Award and the Commanders Award for Civilian Service.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 23, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00517

- CV

James Andy Fry, Appellant

v.

Michael John Lucksinger and J. Allan Garrett, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEF ORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the orders dis missing appellant’s claims signed by the tr i a l court on

January 30

, and January 31, 2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the

C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the orders . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial

cour t’s orders dismissing appellant’s claims

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and the court below.
The HONORABLE GEORGE HOWARD, JR., United States District Judgefor 1 the Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3058

___________ In re: Elmo McMillion, * * Debtor, * *

---------------------- * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Elmo McMillion, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Appellant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Riceland Foods, Inc.; Merlen Watson, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 1998 Filed: April 15, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Elmo McMillion appeals from the district court & s order dismissing hi s 1 bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute. After careful review of the record, we-2-

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny al l pending motions. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
FREDDIE ROOSEVELT TAYLOR

,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4362

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Freddie Roosevelt Taylor

, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General

, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has

recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post

- conviction

relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm ’ n , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)

.
However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts t o expeditiouslydispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State

, 775 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st

DCA 2001).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ.

, CONCUR.

2
No. 11-6125.

#### Kaseen Dobson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 428,

181 L. Ed. 2d 278,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7150.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 99.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Sun River  Energy,  Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Redgie
Green,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Accounting  Officer of the company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 23, 2009


/s/ Redgie Green
--------------------------------
Redgie Green,
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Accounting Officer
No. 10-11099.

#### Vongsavat Sayasane, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 214,

181 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6463.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 482.
No. 11-5603.

#### Antwoyne Neal, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 333,

181 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5926.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*208Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 600.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38821-38822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-348-000]


Gulf States Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

July 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (Gulf States) tendered for filing as part of its

[[Page 38822]]

FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
with an effective date of August 1, 1998:

Second Revised Sheet No. 58G

    Gulf States states that the filing is being made pursuant to 
Subpart C of Part 154 of the Commission's Regulations and in compliance 
with Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-1-007.
    Gulf States states that the purpose of this filing is to implement 
Version 1.2 of the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) standards 
accepted by the Commission in Order No. 587-G. The tendered tariff 
sheet is proposed to be made effective August 1, 1998 and Gulf States 
requests all waivers of the Commission's regulations that may be 
necessary to allow the filing to become effective on August 1, 1998.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19201 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Eric Smit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    ERIC
SMITEric Smit  November 14, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain
Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---

|1 | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<html>
	<head>
		<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" /><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=/stophivtogether/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Factagainstaids%2Fcampaigns%2Flsht%2Findex.html" />	</head>
	<body></body>
	</html>
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000108

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
HAWAII MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

F REDERICK NITTA, M.D., Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(S.P. NO. 19-1-1 GKN)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL ( By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.) Upon consideration of the "Stipulation Withdrawing Appeal and Order," filed March 30, 2020, by Defendant-Appellant Frederick Nitta, it appears that (1) the appeal has not been docketed; (2) pursuant to Hawai ) i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal and bear their own costs and attorneys' fees; (3) the stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) because the appeal has not been docketed, dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(a).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation to dismiss the appeal is approved under HRAP Rule 42(a), and the Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000108 17-APR-2020 10:13 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 17, 2019. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise Associate Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge

2
Exhibit 10

Equity Oil Company
Cash Bonus Plan For Key Employees

Pursuant to the action of the Board of Directors of Equity Oil Company a Cash Bonus Plan for Key Employees of the Company (Plan) has been adopted.

Each
participant in the Plan will have an Individual Award Opportunity (Award Opportunity) set at the beginning of the Plan year. This will be defined as a percentage of base
W-2 salary. To determine the bonus to be paid under the Plan, the percentage award calculated for each factor will be multiplied by the participants Award Opportunity to arrive at a
percentage of base salary.

Participants
of the Plan are divided into two groups: (1) non-officers and (2) officers. The qualifications for each group are outlined below.

Non-Officer Bonus Plan

The Non-Officer Bonus Plan will be based on three factors: (1) change in net asset value per share; (2) production growth; and
(3) personal achievement. A description of each of the factors and the methodology for computation are:





52

---



Officer Bonus Plan

The Bonus Plan for officers will consist of three performance measures: (1) change in net asset value per share; (2) share performance measured for
Equity as a stand alone company and as compared to industry peers; and (3) individual performance. A description of each of the factors and the methodology for computation are:



53

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-7937.

#### Billy Ray McLaughlin, Petitioner v. West Virginia.

562 U.S. 1205, 131 S. Ct. 1056,

178 L. Ed. 2d 873,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1015.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

Same case below, 226 W. Va. 229, 700 S.E.2d 289.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, Arthur H. Keeney III, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III             
|                   |  |  |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                 
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



35
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

ENERGY

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6222

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL FEDERAL CIVILIAN AND NON-DOD CUSTOMERS

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Cost Plus Rate

This memorandum provides the official Cost Plus Rate for DLA Energy petroleum products 

managed under the Defense Working Capital Fund for fiscal year 2023 as $0.07 per gallon. The 

rate published is intended to remain in effect throughout the fiscal year.

Thank you in advance for your support to make our mission successful. Support to our 

customers with the highest quality, priority service and lowest price is our top priority and 

utmost concern.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. James Cooch at (571) 767-5315.

 RICHARD R. SNINSKY

 Comptroller

 DLA Finance Energy
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SERGIO WINSTON ARCHER

HENDERSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-2436

LT Case No. 2009-CF-3535-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 28, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County, 

Melanie Chase, Judge. 

Sergio Winston Archer Henderson, Raiford, 

pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 41001 Summary Calendar

RAYMOND C. POTOSKI ,
P etitioner

- Appellant

v.
JOHN B. FOX , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11

- CV

- 539

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Raymond C. Potoski, federal prisoner # 72713

- 083, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, challenging the Bureau of Prison’s (BOP) calculation of his 84

- month sentence for his 2008 arson

c onviction . He renews his assertion that he is entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for all of the time he spent in pretrial detention and state custody.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 30, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-41001 Document: 00512821109 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2014No. 13

- 41001

The undisputed facts show that Potoski received credit toward his state sentence for the time he spent in state and federal pretrial custody. T he BOP
thus properly denied crediting the same time toward his federal sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) ; see also Leal v. Tombone , 341 F.3d 427, 4 30 (5th Cir. 2003). The federal dis trict court had the discretion to order Potoski’ s federal sentence to run consecutively to his then

- anticipated state sentence, and the BOP correctly presumed from the district court’s not specifying a concurrent sentence that it intended to impose a consecutive sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); Setser v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 1463, 1466

- 73 (2012). The state court’s designation that Potosk i ’s state sentence was to run concurrently with the federal sentence did not have any bearing on the district court’s judgment

an d is irrelevant to the BOP’s computation. See Leal , 341 F.3d at 428

- 29 & n.13. Similarly, because the federal judgment did not specify concurrent sentences, Willis v. United States , 438 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1971), is inapplicable.
Moreover , Potoski has no t demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in declining to make a nunc pro tunc designation of his state prison as the place at which his federal sentence was being served given the federal sentencing judge’s strong opposition to such des ignation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-41001 Document: 00512821109 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2014
DRMS CONTRACT NUMBER 99-4001-0004

Supplemental Agreement 6

Page 2 of 2

**WHEREAS,**Part II, Section B, Product Pool and Property Flow states in pertinent part that:

	The property in the Product Pool is all “scrap” material, and all items that are subject to “Demilitarization as a Conditions of Sale,” for which DRMS is accountable, other than material and items in the list of excluded SCLs and FSCs set forth in Part IV, with DEMIL Codes “A,” “B,” “E,” or “Q” or that are subject to “Demilitarization as a Condition of Sale,”  that become available in the Continental United States (other than Tennessee and the Carolinas) or in Alaska.

**WHEREAS,**the contract currently does not cover either Hawaii and Guam, albeit these sites are all in close proximity to the existing sites on the Commercial Venture (CV) contract which covers DRMS’s usable property,

and, **WHEREAS**, in the interest of achieving cost savings for both, the Purchaser and the Agency, as was used for the rationale of the consolidation for the Scrap Venture (SV) and CV contract, executed in Supplemental Agreement 1 under this contract, the parties hereto mutually agree to modify Part II, Section B. to include Hawaii and Guam into the contract property stream. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto to this modification that:

1. Part II, Section B. is hereby modified to include Hawaii and Guam into the Scrap Venture property stream.

1. Purchaser to implement scrap operations for both sites no later than 60 days after effective date of modification.

1. Purchaser agrees to pay for all property received at the original bid price of $0.0001 per pound  and that revenue distributions will maintain the current split of 23/75.2/1.8 as outlined in Supplemental Agreement 5, paragraphs 5 and 6

1. All other applicable terms and conditions of the contract remain in effect, including but not limited to Parts I-VI, and Articles One (1) through Twenty-Three (23); and Supplemental Agreements 1-5 remain in effect

1. This modification will become effective upon the date of the last affixed signature to this modification.

////////////NOTHING FOLLOWS////////////