alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated:  June 28, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Steven A. DavisSteven A. DavisChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38626-38627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-3108-000]


Rocky Mountain Natural Gas & Electric L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance 
of Order

July 13, 1998.
    Rocky Mountain Natural Gas & Electric L.L.C. (Rocky Mountain) filed 
a rate schedule under which Rocky Mountain will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transaction as a marketer. Rocky Mountain 
also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Rocky Mountain requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Rocky Mountain.
    On July 10, 1998, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Rocky Mountain should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Rocky Mountain is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Rocky Mountain's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.

[[Page 38627]]

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is August 10, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19063 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5273.

#### Wayne M. Fournerat, Petitioner v. Wisconsin Law Review, et al.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 290,

181 L. Ed. 2d 175,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5472.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 816.
No. 11-5351.

#### David Javier Martinez-Reyes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 300,

181 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5551.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 692.
No. 11-5169.

#### Mona Germain, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 277,

181 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5644.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 744.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21
                                                                  ----------


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                         ---------------------------

    The following are the subsidiaries of the Company. All subsidiaries are
wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, unless otherwise
noted.

Entity
Jurisdiction


Falcon Products (Shenzen) Limited
The People's Republic of China

Falcon Holdings, Inc.
Missouri

The Falcon Companies International, Inc.
Missouri

Falcon Mimon a.s. (87.4% ownership)
Czech Republic

Falcon De Juarez, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
         Fundicianes Tecnicas, S.A.
         Mexico

Howe Furniture Corporation
New York
         Johnson Industries, Inc.
         Illinois
         Howe A/S
         Denmark

Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.
Delaware

         Sellers & Josephson, Inc.
         New Jersey

         Shelby FSC Corporation
         U.S. Virgin Islands

         Madison Furniture Industries, Inc.
         Mississippi

         Thonet International (UK) Limited
         England

         Industrial Mueblera Shelby Williams, S.A. de  C.V.
         Mexico
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: May 8, 2007



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
OR

RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Spine Pain Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Bergeron, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: August 10, 2012 | By:                                                   | /s/ John Bergeron
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                      | John Bergeron                                        
|                      | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange
Act”), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Spine Pain Management, Inc. under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Field Name    				Length  
------------  				--------
FIIG_4065				VAR/DLM(|)
INC_4080				VAR/DLM(|)
MRC_3445				VAR/DLM(|)
RPLY_TBL_DCOD_3845			VAR/DLM(|)
No. 11-5101.

#### William Keisling, Petitioner v. Richard K. Renn, et al.

565 U.S. 934, 132 S. Ct. 383,

181 L. Ed. 2d 241,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6444,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 106.
No. D-2494.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Robert Hunter Ford.

562 U.S. 1197, 131 S. Ct. 1066,

178 L. Ed. 2d 880,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1039.

January 24, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 58, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1147, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5686.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Amendment No. 2 
 to the

 TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. 

2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan 

Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), this Second Amendment (this
“Amendment”) to the Plan is made and shall be effective as of June 23, 2014. 
 1. Section 2.4 of the Plan is deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “No Repricing without Stockholder Approval. Other than in connection with
any equity restructuring or any other change in the Company’s capitalization (as described in Section 5.7), the Committee shall not, without stockholder approval, reduce the exercise price of a previously awarded option or SAR and, at any
time when the exercise price of a previously awarded option or SAR is above the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock, the Committee shall not, without stockholder approval, cancel and re-grant or
exchange such option or SAR for cash or a new award with a lower (or no) exercise price.” 
 2. Except as expressly provided herein,
all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 The remainder of this
page is intentionally left blank. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Plan is executed as of June 23, 2014. 

 

			
	TRI POINTE HOMES, INC., a Delaware
corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas F. Bauer

	Name:	 	Douglas F. Bauer
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of July 18, 2008 (the "Amendment"), to EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and SUCCESSOR COMPANIES AND JOHN D.REIERSEN, dated as of September 13, 2006 and AMENDMENT NO.1 dated January 25, 2008 (the "Agreement")




RECITALS




WHEREAS, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (the "Company") and John D. Reiersen (the "Employee") have entered into the Agreement which sets forth the terms and conditions upon which the Employee is employed by the Company and upon which the Company compensates the Employee.




WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary:




1.  The Employee subject to the provisions of Amendment 1 of the Agreement Sections 2 and 3, shall continue to be employed with the title of President and CEO and serve on the Board of Directors until December 31, 2011.




2.  The Employee's Salary and benefits for the period 1/01/10 to 12/31/11 shall be the same as detailed in the Agreement for the period 1/01/09 to 12/31/09, except that effective 1/01/10 and 1/01/11, the employee shall receive pay raises of 5% on each of these dates.




3.  The provisions of the Agreement at Amendment 1, Section 4 are hereby deleted.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Company and Employee have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY






By:
/s/ Barry GoldsteinBarry Goldstein, Chairman of the Board
 /s/John D. ReiersenJohn D. Reiersen, President and CEO
No. 11-5576.

#### Domenic Tricome, Petitioner v. Heather McLaughlin, et al.

565 U.S. 946, 132 S. Ct. 404,

181 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7353.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District, denied.
No. 11-5710.

#### Marvin Cortez Estrada, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 342,

181 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6776.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 390.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALFONZO HECTOR PENA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30363

D.C. No. 9:09-cr-00004-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Alfonzo Hector Pena appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to sell of 50 grams

or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-30363

Pena contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the

career offender enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a) over-represents the

seriousness of Pena’s past offenses and does not account for the nature and

circumstances of the offense or Pena’s history and characteristics. The record

reflects that the district court correctly determined that the career offender

enhancement applies, that it has considered and addressed all of the factors set

forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that it did not otherwise procedurally err. See

United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also

United States v. Diaz-Argueta, 564 F.3d 1047, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2009). The

record further reflects that, under the totality of the circumstances, Pena’s sentence

is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 (2007);

see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
No. 11-5170.

#### David Hall, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 277,

181 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5647.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 11-5632.

#### Darrell Watson, Petitioner v. Thomas LaValley, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al.

565 U.S. 917, 132 S. Ct. 335,

181 L. Ed. 2d 209,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5875.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 501.
1 of 2

 
and to the application of any payment on this obligation, or as an offset hereto, and agreeto all extensions, renewals, partial payments, substitutions or evidence of indebtedness and thetaking, release or substitution of all or any part of the security or the release of any partyliable hereon with or without notice before or after maturity.     It is the intention of the parties hereto to comply with the usury laws applicable to thisloan if any, accordingly it is agreed that notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in thisNote or in any of the documents securing payment hereof no such provision shall require the paymentor permit the collection of interest in excess of the maximum permitted by law. If any excess ofinterest is provided for, contracted for, charged for or received, then the provisions of thisparagraph shall govern and control and neither the Maker hereof nor any other party liable for thepayment hereof shall be obligated to pay the amount of such excess interest. Any such excessinterest which may have been collected shall be, at the Holder’s option, either applied as a creditagainst the then unpaid principal amount hereof or refunded to Maker. The effective rate ofinterest shall be automatically subject to reduction to the maximum lawful contract rate allowedunder the usury laws as now or hereafter construed. It is further agreed that without limitation ofthe foregoing, all calculations of the rate of interest contracted for, charged for, or receivedunder this Note which are made for the purposes of determining whether such rate exceeds themaximum lawful rate, shall be made, to the extent permitted by law, by amortizing, prorating,allocating and spreading in equal parts during the full stated term of this Note, all interestcontracted for, charged for or received from the Maker or otherwise by the Note Holder.     In the event this Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection (whether or notsuit is filed), or in the event it is collected by suit or through bankruptcy, probate,receivership or other legal proceedings (including foreclosure), the undersigned hereby agrees topay to the Holder as attorney’s fees a reasonable amount in addition to the principal and interestthen due hereon, and all other costs of collection.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has fully executed this Note as of the date first above written.         **Sun****River Energy,****Inc.**a Colorado Corporation
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Consl. Ct. No

. 06 -141 C

Filed : December 14, 2015

****************************************

*

*

*

SHELL OIL COMPANY, ATLANTIC *

RICHFIELD COMPANY, TEXACO INC., and *

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, *

*

Plaintiffs, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

*

*

****************************************

ORDER

Pursuant to the court ’s October 30, 2015 Opinion in Shell Oil Co. v. United States , 12 3

Fed. Cl. 707, 719 (2015), where in it determined that the Government waived an insurance offset

defense, Plaintiffs ’ November 17, 2015 Motion In Limine is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Susan G. Braden

SUSAN G. BRADEN

Judge
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeremy Poirier, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Bearing Lithium Corp. for the year ended October 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bearing Lithium Corp.                                                        



|Dated: May 18, 2018 |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |                                                 
|                    |  | /s/Jeremy Poirier                               
|                    |  | Jeremy Poirier                                  
|                    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                   
|                    |  | Bearing Lithium Corp.                           



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bearing Lithium Corp. and will be retained by Bearing Lithium Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Towarnicki, Chief Executive Officer of Cell Pathways, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
         ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended and

         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2003

                                                  By: /s/ Robert J. Towarnicki
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Robert J. Towarnicki
                                                      Chief Executive Officer



                                       20
Field Name    		Length  
------------  		--------
NM_CD_2303              CHAR(5)
RPLD_INC_2646           CHAR(5)