alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

1

DIC FDE/FDF FORMAT

REQUEST FOR SUMMARY BILLING ADJUSTMENT

AND

FOLLOW-UP ON REQUEST FOR SUMMARY BILLING 

ADJUSTMENT

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DI Code 1-3 Enter

FDE for initial request.

FDF for follow-up request.

RI Code (Billing Office) 4-6 Perpetrate from the duplicate summary 

billing record (SBR).

Recipient of Billing 

Status Code

7 Enter the applicable code.

Blank 8-10 Leave blank.

Bill Number (Duplicate) 11-15 Enter the bill number of the billing that 

totally duplicates a prior billing.

Blank 16-18 Leave blank.

Duplicate Bill Date 19-21 Enter the year within decade and month 

of decade (YMM) of the duplicate bill.

Blank 22-24 Leave blank.

Bill Number (Original) 25-29 For advice code 42 leave blank. 

For advice code 43 and 44, enter bill 

number of the original bill.

Blank 30-32 Leave blank.

Original Bill Date 33-35 Enter the year within decade and the 

month (YMM) of the original bill.

Amount (Original Bill) 36-44 For advice code 42, leave blank. 

For advice codes 43 and 44, enter the 

amount of the original bill.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

2

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DoDAAC 45-50 For advice code 42, enter the DoDAAC 

of the billed office. 

For advice codes 43 and 44, enter the 

DoDAAC of the office requesting the 

adjustment.

Blank 51-58 For advice code 42, leave blank. 

For advice codes 43 and 44, enter

51-52: The fund code under which 

adjustment is to be processed.

53-58: The DoDAAC of the office 

receiving the adjustment

Billing Advice 59-61 Enter:

59 Blank or character significant to 

requestor.

60-61, 42, 43, 44 as appropriate

Day of Year 62-64 Enter day request is submitted.

Amount (Duplicate) 65-73 Enter the amount of the duplicate bill. 

Blank 74-80 Leave blank.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7476
RICHARD LEE MULLEN, #143838, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGEORGE P. DODSON, Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; ALBERT CRAMER, Physician, Coffeewood Correctional Center; VIRGINIA SMITH, Nurse, Coffeewood Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-566-R) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Mullen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mullen v. Dodson , No. CA-97-566-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ANDERSEN(LOGO)

Exhibit23

**Consentof Independent Public Accountants**

As independent publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofour report included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company'spreviously filed Registration Statements (as amended, asapplicable) File Numbers 33-4041, 33-9570, 33-12119, 33-15680,33-37827, 33-56762, 33-65123, 33-83402, 333-07413, 333-10919,333-10965, 333-30947, 333-57651, 333-66149, 333-47633, 333-66147,333-67341, 333-68621, 333-90133, 333-90139, 333-35102, 333-35274,333-41140, 333-41138, 333-63274, 333-66980, 333-70912 and333-85668.  Our report dated February 11, 2002 (except withrespect to the matters discussed in Note 2, as to which the date isFebruary 28, 2002 and with respect to the matters discussed in Note15, as to which the date is March 21, 2002) included in The TitanCorporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001is no longer appropriate since restated financial statements havebeen presented giving effect to a discontinuedoperation.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSENSan Diego, CaliforniaJune 11, 2002
No. 11-6008.

#### Douglas E. Campbell, Petitioner v. Claude Maye, Warden.

565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 361,

181 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7024.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 382.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00419

- CR

William Horace WALKER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1349

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED August 19, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
# 2017 Codebook

# IISAR 2017
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Eric Smit, the chief financialofficer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

**AP2.5. APPENDIX 2.5**

**TYPE OF BILL CODES**

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, April 29, 2016*

*Change 6*

79

AP2.5-

APPENDIX 2.5

AP2.5-2	APPENDIX 2.5

73

**AP2.5-**

74

APPENDIX 2.5

79

APPENDIX 2.5
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 29, 2013

t0522

Order 

Clerk

May 29, 2013

146183

JEFFREY JOHN CARSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146183

COA: 308291 

Ingham CC: 10-001064-NF

HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
No. 11-6226.

#### Morris Duane Buckles, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 957, 132 S. Ct. 436,

181 L. Ed. 2d 283,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7191.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 883.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, R. James Kelly, ViceChairman and Chief Financial Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  the Annual Report on Form10-K of the Company for the year ended August 27, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

•                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 7, 2005

 

 
| /s/ R. James Kelly |
|--------------------|
|               | R. James Kelly |
|               | Vice Chairman and Chief  Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Family Dollar Stores, Inc., andwill be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc., and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
No. 11-5065.

#### Mark W. Lomax, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 264,

181 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5479.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5471.

#### Malcome Aparicio, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 316,

181 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5829.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Leadership Initiatives

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Leadership Initiatives Panel, ArtsREACH Section to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held on July 28-31, 1998. The panel will 
meet from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on July 28, from 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 
p.m. on July 29, from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on July 30, and from 9:30 
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on July 31, in Room 730 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of 
this meeting, from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on July 31, will be open to 
the public for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
on July 28, from 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on July 29, and from 8:30 a.m. 
to 6:00 p.m. on July 30, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of May 14, 1998, these sessions will be 
closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4),(6) and (9)(B) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need accommodations due to a disability, please contact the 
Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/
682-5691.

    Dated: July 1, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-17996 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
**CH 1**

**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

**CH 1**

**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP1.1. APPENDIX 1.1**

**INVENTORY CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS REPORT (AMMUNITION) DD FORM 2338-1**

**AP3.61-1**

4

**AP3.61-**

AP1.1-1

APPENDIX 1.1

# image1.emf

# image2.emf
No. 10-9445.

#### Rene Pacheco-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 962, 132 S. Ct. 451,

181 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7491.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 941.
Exhibit 10.17


 


EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


Dated this 3rd day of February 2010 and effective June 30, 2008
(the "Effective Date") by and between Viral Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Dr.
Eric S. Rosenberg ("Consultant").


 


WHEREAS Company and Consultant are
party to a Consulting Agreement dated July 1, 2006 (the "Original Agreement") and wish to extend it subject to certain
terms and conditions.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and lawful
consideration and of the mutual covenants contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived hereunder, the parties agree
as follows:


 


	1.		The Parties represent and warrant that the Term of the Original Agreement was verbally
extended on the Effective Date and that this Extension Agreement represents a formal documentation of same.



 


	2.		The Term of the Original Agreement is hereby extended indefinitely until such time
as it is terminated in accordance with Section 13 of the Original Agreement.



 


	3.		All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect, including without limitation, those in Exhibit D therein entitled "Viral Genetics Intellectual Property Agreement",
from June 30, 2008 through the date hereof.



 





	 	AGREED and entered into as of the date affixed hereof.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPANY:	 	 	 
	 	VIRAL GENETICS, INC.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By	 
	 	Duly Authorized Officer	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CONSULTANT:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	/s/ Eric S. Rosenberg, MD
	 	Eric S. Rosenberg, MD
DLA FORM 2538, AUG 2018 PDF (DLA)

SALES CONTRACT LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Prescribed by: DODM 4160.21 

Sponsor: Disposition Services

SIGNATURE OF PURCHASER

(PRINT NAME) (PRINT NAME)

DATE

 I, the undersigned, hereby authorize to act as my agent on

 Contract

EXTENT OF AUTHORITY LIST ITEM(S) 

 with respect to the items listed below and for the

 purpose indicated by check mark in the boxes provided under "Extent of Authority".

TO:

Make payment.

Make payment and remove property.

Remove property.

Perform work required under the contract.

Accept and sign for deliveries above or below the 

quantity variations allowed under the contract.

Sign certifications required prior to Government's 

permitting release of property.

Other (specify):

REPLACES DRMS FORM 1646, WHICH IS OBSOLETE
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39582-39583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98F-0570]


BASF Corp.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that BASF 
Corp. has filed a petition proposing that the food additive regulations 
be amended to provide for

[[Page 39583]]

the safe use of chromium antimony titanium buff rutile (C.I. Pigment 
Brown 24) as a colorant for polymers intended for use in contact with 
food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4608) has been filed by BASF Corp., 3000 
Continental Dr. North, Mt. Olive, NJ 07828-1234. The petition proposes 
to amend the food additive regulations to provide for the safe use of 
chromium antimony titanium buff rutile (C.I. Pigment Brown 24) as a 
colorant for polymers intended for use in contact with food.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: July 6, 1998.
Laura M. Tarantino,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 98-19562 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 11-5919.

#### Lazzerick Alexander, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 937, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 245,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6377.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Notice Of Conversion


EXHIBIT 10.1




Notice Of Conversion




(To be executed by the Holder in order to convert the Note)







To:

INVENT Ventures, Inc.







The undersigned hereby irrevocably elects to convert $20,000 of the principal amount and $1808.22 of accrued interest of the Convertible Promissory Note dated September 27, 2013 into 155,773 shares of INVENT Ventures, Inc., according to the conditions stated therein, as of the Conversion Date written below.







Conversion Date:

June 30, 2014




Applicable Conversion Price:

$0.14 per share




Signature:

/s/ Dominick Maiorano, Inc.




Name:

Dominick Maiorano, Inc.




Address:










Number of shares of common stock to be issued: 155,773 







Please send the certificate to:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 630

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 20

- 33435

Trial court: 280 th District Court of Harris County

Appell ee has filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record with a transcript from an August 12, 2020 hearing

. Appellee also requests that this Court order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record.

“If anything relevant is omitted from the reporter’s record

. . . the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement al reporter’s record containing the omitted items. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(d). After reviewing the record and appellant’s brief, we grant appellee’s motion in part. We order the official court reporter for the 280th District Court to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter’s record of the August 12, 2020 hearing. See T E X

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(d). The supplemental reporter’s record is due in this Court within 15 days of the date of this order

. Regarding appellee’s request for this Court to order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record, we n ote that appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs

in the trial court

, and the record does not reflect that the trial court overruled appellant’s claim of indigence. See T EX

. R. C IV . P. 145 (a), (c) ; T EX

. R. A PP . P. 20.1 . Accordingly, we deny appellee’s request to order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record. See Abrigo v. Ginez , 580 S.W.3d 416, 419 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, no pet.) (stating that “statement of inability to pay that is uncontested in the trial court is conclusive as a matter of

law” and that it is “an abuse of discretion for any judge . . . to order costs in spite of an uncontested [statement of inability to pay costs]” ).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Sherry Rada ck

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ February 2, 2021

____
No. 11-5604.

#### Joseph Joines, Petitioner v. Belinda Davis, Warden.

565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 405,

181 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7295.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Dooly County, denied.
Presidential Documents

3635

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 16

Monday, January 26, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 98–9 of January 6, 1998

Designation of Argentina as a Major Non-NATO Ally

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

I hereby designate the Republic of Argentina a major non-NATO ally of

the United States pursuant to section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act

of 1961, as amended, for the purposes of the Foreign Assistance Act of

1961, as amended, and the Arms Export Control Act.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal

[FR Doc. 98–1945

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 6, 1998.

.

œ–

Filed 1–23–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–P
No. 11-5880.

#### DeLarron Keith Washington, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 354,

181 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6916.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Field Name    				Length  
------------  				--------
RPLY_TBL_MRD_8254			VAR/DLM(|)	
CDD_RPLY_3465				VAR/DLM(|)
RPLY_STAT_IND_2498			VAR/DLM(|)
DCOD_RPLY_ST_3864			VAR/DLM(|)