alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-K for the year ended November 2, 1996, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                           5,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                       439
<INVENTORY>                                     21,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,369
<PP&E>                                          41,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,989
<SALES>                                        111,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,040
<CGS>                                           75,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (95)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a) /15D-14(d), As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I,
Linda Borchert Philp, Chief Financial Officer of Lodgian, Inc. (the
Registrant), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the
Registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
Registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated
this 21st day of April, 2005. /s/ Linda Borchert Philp
Linda Borchert Philp, Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-5619.

#### Charles E. Wiig, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 334,

181 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5797.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-1469.

#### Vincent L. Abell, Petitioner v. Maria-Theresa Wilson.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 111,

181 L. Ed. 2d 36,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5544,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 997 A.2d 37.
Meeting Between EPA and Power4Georgians, LLC 

February 13, 2013 

Agenda 

• Introductions 

• Plant Washington Overview 

• Review of Status of MATS Rule and Greenhouse Gas NSPS As Applicable to Plant 

Washington 

• Path Forward 
Timeline of Relevant Events 

January 2008 Permit application submitted to Georgia EPD. 

April 8, 2010 Georgia EPD issues Air Quality Permit to P4G. 

May 10, 2010 Environmental groups administratively appeal the Permit, which automatically stays 

its effectiveness. 

Jan. 18, 2011 The ALJ issues an interlocutory decision remanding the Permit to Georgia EPD for 

the “sole and limited purpose” of revising certain HAP emission standards. 

Nov. 18, 2011 Georgia EPD issues a Permit Amendment addressing the HAP issues. 

Dec. 16, 2011 Environmental groups challenge the Permit Amendment. 

April 9, 2012 P4G and the environmental groups reach a settlement. The ALJ enters a final 

decision affirming all provisions of the permit required under the PSD program. 

April 12, 2012 Proposed greenhouse gas NSPS is published in the Federal Register. 

April 16, 2012 MATS Rule becomes effective. The standards are too low to be guaranteed by 

equipment vendors. P4G files a petition for reconsideration with EPA. P4G and 

other new unit developers also file a legal challenge to the rule in the D.C. Circuit. 

June 12, 2012 P4G and others file challenges to the proposed greenhouse gas NSPS in the D.C. 

Circuit. 

June 28, 2012 The D.C. Circuit grants expedited review of P4G’s challenge to the MATS Rule, 

based on showing that P4G was suffering irreparable harm and the rule was subject to 

“substantial challenge.” 

July 20, 2012 EPA grants P4G’s petition for reconsideration of the MATS Rule. EPA moves to 

stay P4G’s challenge to the MATS Rule. This motion is granted in September 2012 

based on EPA’s representations that it will issue reconsidered standards “by March, 

2013.” 

Nov. 30, 2012 EPA publishes proposed revisions to MATS Rule standards. 

Dec. 12, 2012 D.C. Circuit dismisses all challenges to the proposed greenhouse gas NSPS. 

Jan. 7, 2013 D.C. Circuit denies P4G’s request for rulemaking deadline or to resume briefing in 

the MATS Rule appeal. The public comment period on the proposed revisions to 

MATS Rule standards closes. 

March 2013 Reconsidered MATS Rule issued? 

April 13, 2013 Transitional source deadline? 

September 2013 Deadline for P4G to commence construction under its PSD Permit.
No. 10-10909.

#### Fernando Valdez, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 188,

181 L. Ed. 2d 97,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6364.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6252.

#### Alquan Muslim, Petitioner v. Michelle R. Ricci, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

565 U.S. 968, 132 S. Ct. 465,

181 L. Ed. 2d 303,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7496.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE>

EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT.

The  subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 1997, and the state in which
each was organized are as scheduled below:
<CAPTION>
                                               State or
                                               Jurisdiction
                                               Under Laws of                 Name Under Which
Name of Subsidiaries                           Which Organized               Subsidiaries Do Business
--------------------                           ---------------               ------------------------
<S> <C>
F&M Bank-Winchester                            Virginia                      F&M Bank-Winchester
    Big Apple Mortgage                                                          Big Apple Mortgage
    Company, Inc.(1)                           Virginia                           Company
    Winchester Credit                                                           Winchester Credit
       Corporation(1)                          Virginia                           Corporation
    Credit Bureau of                                                            Credit Bureau of
    Winchester, Inc.(1)                        Virginia                           Winchester
    Apple Title Company(1)                     Virginia                      Apple Title Company
    F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver                                                   F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver
       Insurance, Inc.                         Virginia                        Insurance
    F&M Financial Services, Inc.               Virginia                      F&M Financial Services

F&M Bank-Central Virginia                      Virginia                      F&M Bank-Central Virginia

F&M Bank-Massanutten                           Virginia                      F&M Bank-Massanutten

F&M Bank-Richmond                              Virginia                      F&M Bank-Richmond

F&M Bank-Martinsburg, Inc.                     West Virginia                 F&M Bank-Martinsburg

F&M Bank-Blakeley, Inc.                        West Virginia                 F&M Bank-Blakeley

F&M Bank-Keyser, Inc.                          West Virginia                 F&M Bank-Keyser

F&M Bank-Emporia                               Virginia                      F&M Bank-Emporia

F&M Bank-Peoples                               Virginia                      F&M Bank-Peoples

F&M Bank-Northern Virginia                     Virginia                      F&M Bank-Northern Virginia

F&M Bank-Allegiance, Inc.                      Maryland                      F&M Bank-Allegiance
</TABLE>

 (1) Winchester  Credit  Corporation,  Big Apple Mortgage Co., Inc., Apple Title
Company,  F&M/Shomo & Lineweaver  Insurance,  Inc., and F&M Financial  Services,
Inc., are  wholly-owned  subsidiaries of F&M  Bank-Winchester.  Credit Bureau of
Winchester is a wholly-owned  subsidiary of Winchester Credit  Corporation.  All
other bank subsidiaries are wholly-owned by F&M National.
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN)


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








Publications						Print
																Related Pages
					Selected Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) PapersPapers on surveillance for hospitalizations and outpatient visits associated with AGESelected Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) PapersPapers on surveillance for hospitalizations and outpatient visits associated with ARI
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  December 7, 2023						Source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeNVSN Home
ARI Dashboard
Current NVSN Sites
PREVAIL Cohort Study
Publicationsplus icon
Selected AGE Papers
Selected ARI Papers National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS)Unexplained Respiratory Disease Outbreaks (URDO)


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
No. 11-16.

#### Realcomp II, Ltd., Petitioner v. Federal Trade Commission.

565 U.S. 942, 132 S. Ct. 400,

181 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7292.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 815.
No. 11-6089.

#### James Lamont Moore, Petitioner v. Nevada.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 427,

181 L. Ed. 2d 277,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7301.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.

Same case below, 127 Nev. 1161, 373 P.3d 944.
EXHIBIT 21


                           Subsidiaries of the Company


1.       Adirondack Knitting Mills, Inc., a New York corporation.

2.       Fab-Lace, Inc., a New York corporation.

3.       Fab International Ltd., a Delaware corporation.

4.       Gem Urethane Corp., a New York corporation.

5.       Lamatronics Industries, Inc., a New York corporation.

6.       Mohican Mills, Inc., a New York corporation.

7.       Salisbury Manufacturing Corp., a North Carolina corporation.

8.       Sandel International, Inc., a New York corporation.

9.       SMS Textiles, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

10.      Travis Knits, Inc., a North Carolina corporation.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Cespedes,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/ 
      Edward A.
      CespedesEdward
      A. CespedesChief
      Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00597-CV

AGUA SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT

v.

CARMELO ALVAREZ, JR.

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CCD-0136-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 5, 2015
No. 11-64.

#### Francarl Realty Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Town of East Hampton, New York.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 380,

181 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6253.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 400 Fed. Appx. 605.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6667

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. PRISCILLA LYDIA T UR NER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr
- 00133

- MR

- DLH

- 1 )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Priscilla Lydia Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Priscilla Lydia Turner appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to modify the restitution payments she is required to make through the Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Turner ’ s informal brief does not challenge the bas is for the district court’s disposition, Turner has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limite d to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the d ecisional process.
AFFIRMED
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 LODGIAN, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Edward J. RohlingEDWARD J. ROHLINGChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ James A. MacLennanJAMES A. MACLENNANExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   54
No. 10-11134.

#### Kevin Millen, Petitioner v. Tennessee.

565 U.S. 869, 132 S. Ct. 219,

181 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6526.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3220 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow certain 

institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of certain 

foods, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Ms. PINGREE (for herself, Mr. FORTENBERRY, and Mr. HARDER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to allow certain institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of certain foods, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kids Eat Local Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3220 IH

1 SEC. 2. GEOGRAPHIC PREFERENCE AND IDENTIFICATION 

2 FOR SCHOOL FOOD. 

3 Paragraph (3) of section 9(j) of the Richard B. Rus4 sell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(j)) is 

5 amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(3) allow institutions receiving funds under 

7 this Act and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 

8 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), including the Department of 

9 Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program— 

10 ‘‘(A) to use a geographic preference for the 

11 procurement of unprocessed agricultural prod12 ucts, both locally grown and locally raised; or 

13 ‘‘(B) to use locally grown, locally raised, or 

14 locally caught as a product specification.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-318-000]


ANR Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, ANR Storage Company (ANRS) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 153, to be effective August 1, 1998.
    ANRS states that the purpose of the filing is to incorporate 
Version 1.2 of the GISB standards adopted by the Gas Industry Standards 
Board and incorporated into the Commission's Regulations by Order No. 
587-G, issued April 16, 1998, at Docket No. RM96-1-007.
    ANRS states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18507 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M