alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

                      EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-K
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           JURISDICTION OF                PERCENTAGE OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          INCORPORATION                   OWNERSHIP
------------------                          -------------                   ---------
<S>                                       <C>                                 <C>
Emerson Radio (Hong Kong) Limited.        Hong Kong                           100.0%*
Emerson Radio International Ltd.          British Virgin Islands              100.0%
Sport Supply Group, Inc.                  Delaware                             53.2%
Emerson Global Limited                    British Virgin Islands              100.0%
</TABLE>



* One share is owned by a resident director, pursuant to local law.
No. 11-5539.

#### Troy Layne, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 913, 132 S. Ct. 326,

181 L. Ed. 2d 202,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6284.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 11-5222.

#### Patrick Pitchon, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

565 U.S. 896, 132 S. Ct. 283,

181 L. Ed. 2d 170,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5461.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10719.

#### Gregory Downs, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 846, 132 S. Ct. 163,

181 L. Ed. 2d 77,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6135,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
No. 11-150.

#### Marteen Moore, Petitioner v. USC University Hospital, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 254,

181 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5257,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 640.
No. 11-5239.

#### Daniel L. Williams, Petitioner v. Jack Koon, Warden.

565 U.S. 896, 132 S. Ct. 285,

181 L. Ed. 2d 171,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5574.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Baldwin County, denied.
# C_2015320EN.01000802.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/8

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Slovenská autobusová doprava Trnava a.s. v Krajský úřad Olomouckého kraje

(Case C-318/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Articles 49 TFEU and 52 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public transport by rail and by road - Bus transport on urban public transport lines - Carrier established in another Member State and operating through a branch - Requirement to obtain special authorisation - Discretionary power of the competent authority - Public service contract))

(2015/C 320/11)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Slovenská autobusová doprava Trnava a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: Krajský úřad Olomouckého kraje

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State requiring only foreign carriers which have a branch office in that Member State to obtain special authorisation issued on a discretionary basis by the competent authorities in order to operate an urban public transport service by road in the territory of that Member State alone.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1421

(Re-examination No. 90/006,696)

IN RE PENG TAN

David Fink , Fink & Johnson, of Houston, Texas, argued for appellant.

William LaMarca , Associate Solicitor, Office of t he Solicitor, United States Patent

and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virgin ia, argued for the Director of the United

States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen

, Solicitor, and Nathan K. Kelley , Associate Solicitor.

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and InterferencesNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1421

(Re-examination No. 90/006, 696)

. IN RE PENG TAN



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED April 3, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

____________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.
    Cross Trans Service USA, Inc., 1480 Elmhurst Road, Elk Grove 
Village, IL 60007. Officers: Kurt Konodi-Floch, President, Katherine 
Lovejoy-Berman, Vice President.

    Dated: July 9, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18737 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
AP9 R04
- 30
- 92 S: \ FormsLib \ Civil Bureau \ Civil Courts & Post Judg ment \ Post Trial \ Appeal Status Card Revised 01
- 18
- 2013 

### DATE **11/11/2015 NOTICE OF APPEALS**  **ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS TO:**  **1ST COURT OF APPEALS** 

**From: Deputy Clerk:**  **DUANE C. GILMORE Chris Daniel, District Clerk**  **Harris County, T E X A S** 

### CAUSE: **2015 -**  **00723 TRIAL COURT NO:**  **190TH DUE:**  **11/16/2015 VOLUME**  **PAGE OR IMAGE #:**  **6665272 7**  **ATTORNEY: GLENN HERBERT JOHNSON**  **TBN/PRO SE#: 1 (Pro Se)**  **NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE FI**  **RST COURT OF APPEALS**  **DATE ORDER SIGNED: 8/17/2015**  **REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED N/A**  **NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED: 11/6/2015**  **NOTICE OF APPEAL PREVIOUSLY FILED? Y**  **NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10**  **FILE ORDERED: YES NO**  **IMAGED FILED: YES NO**  **NOTES: Previous Appellate Case No: 01**  **- 14**  **- 00383**  **- CV (Trial Court Case No: 2013**  **- 08713 190th Court)**  **Accelerated Appeal CODES: D, OA** CHRIS DANIEL Harris County, District Clerk By: /s/ DUANE C. GILMORE **DUANE C. GILMORE , Deputy**  **BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED**  **BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED** 

**– GOVERNMENT**  **C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED**  **D -**  **ACCELERATED APPEAL OA**  **NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED**  **(W/NOTICE OF APPEAL** ) **NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL** 

### J WEB INT 65.10 CIVIL SYSTEM │ CIVIL CASE INTAKE │ GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY NOVEMBER 11, 2015 GILMORE, DUANE INT 65.10
**(11) CONNECTION(S) FOUND.**

CASE NUM: **201500723** PJN: TRANS NUM: CURRENT COURT: **190** PUB: Please Select CASE TYPE: **DAMAGES (OTH)** CASE STATUS: **READY DOCKET** STYLE: **JOHNSON, GLENN** VS **WALI, HASHMET**
****** ACTIVE PARTIES ****** PJN PER/CONN NO COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY STAT ASSOC. ATTY 00029

- 0001 CNT 08429500 DISTRICT CLERK OF HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS GREGG, HARRISON JR. 00021

- 0001 AGT LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON L L P BY SERVING ITS REGISTERED 00013

- 0001 AGT CASTILLO EXPERT TREE SERVICE (AKA CASTILLO DEMOLITION EXPERT TREE 00012

- 0001 AGT TEXAS EASY-SERVE L L C BY SERVING THROUGH DAVID C WILLMS ITS PRESIDENT 00009

- 0001 DEF CASTILLO EXPERT TREE SERVICE (AKA CASTILLO DEMOLITITION EXPERT TREE 00008

- 0001 DEF 24002723 TEXAS EASY-SERVE L L C PADDOCK, ROBERT LAWTON 00005

- 0001 DEF THOMPSON, LYNDA 00004

- 0001 DEF 22243410 ZAKARIA, YOUSUF MUHAMMAD ZAKARIA, MOHAMMED ALI 00003

- 0001 DEF 22243410 BROUSSARD, CHARLES P II ZAKARIA, MOHAMMED ALI 00002

- 0001 DEF 22243410 WALI, HASHMET ZAKARIA, MOHAMMED ALI 00001

- 0001 PLT JOHNSON, GLENN PRO-SE

Submit Query 1 Total Pages **Submit Query Submit Query**  1 **Submit Query Submit Query**  Records Per-Page 20
INACTIVE ATY INQ ACT UPDT SERV ISSU DOCU INQ CASE SUMM INQ PTY ADDR ATY SUB MUL ATY SUB ATY W/DRAWL PTY W/DRAWL Harris County Information Technology Center (ITC) Justice Applications 

## Page 1 of 1 Harris County (JWEB) Justice Applications (INT6510)

11/ 11/ 2015 http://civil.jweb.harriscountytx.gov/INT/INT6510.aspx?GV_CASE_NUM=201500723
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending November 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Miller,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



By: /s/ David A. Miller
    --------------------------

David A. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
February 27, 2004
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Vivic Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shang-Chiai Kung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  May 16, 2022  By:/s/Shang-Chiai Kung Shang-Chiai Kung  Chief  Financial Officer
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Eaken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2005     /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                         Principal Executive Officer
                         Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-930-4210-05, N-59066, and N-61108]


Termination of Land Exchange Segregation; Clark County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action terminates the land exchange segregation, dated 
July 23, 1997, for N-61855. The lands are being made available for a 
Recreation & Public Purpose (R&PP) Leases to Clark County for a County 
Operations Facility (N-59066) and a park site (N-61108).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 16, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Frassa-McDonough, (702) 647-
5088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon notation to the public land office 
records, on July 23, 1997, the lands were segregated for exchange 
purposes. The lands became segregated from all other forms of 
appropriation under the public land laws including location and entry 
under the mining laws. The lands are needed for R&PP Leases. The 
segregation is hereby terminated on the following described lands:

N-59066

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 21 S., R. 61 E.,
    Sec. 31, Lots, 21, 26, 27, 28, 30, 35, 36 W\1/2\W\1/2\NE\1/
4\NW\1/4\, SE\1/4\SW\1/4\NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\NW\1/
4\, E\1/2\,SE\1/4\NE\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    Approximately 38.34 acres.

N-61108

Mount Diablo Meridian,

T. 22 S., R. 61 E.,
    Sec. 15, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, SE\1/4\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\.

    Approximately 20.0 acres.

    The areas described aggregate 58.34 acres.

    The land is hereby made available for Recreation & Public Purposes. 
The land will remain closed to surface entry and mining due to an 
overlaping segregation.

    Dated: July 9, 1998.
Rex Wells,
Assistant Field Office Manager, Las Vegas Field Office.
[FR Doc. 98-18942 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent No. 5,618,011 
for the Load Securing and Releasing System

AGENCY: U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1), announcement is made of 
a prospective exclusive license of a load securing and releasing system 
described in U.S. Patent No. 5,618,011, issued on April 8, 1997.

DATES: Written objections must be filed on or before 21 September 1998.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command, Office of Chief Counsel, 
Attn: Patent Counsel, Kansas Street, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5035.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Vincent J. Ranucci, Patent Counsel at 508-233-4510 or Ms. Jessica 
M. Niro, Paralegal Specialist at 508-233-4513.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Load Securing and Releasing System was 
invented by Messrs. James Sadeck, Gary F. Vincens and Donald Billoni. 
Rights to this invention are vested in the U.S. Government as 
represented by the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command (SSCOM). Under the 
authority of section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 
1986 (Pub. L. 92-502) and section 207 of Title 35, U.S. Code, the 
Department of the Army as represented by SSCOM intends to grant an 
exclusive license on the load securing and releasing system to New 
England Ropes, Inc., 848 Airport Road, Fall River, Massachusetts 02720.
    Pursuant to 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1), any interested party may file 
written objections to this prospective license arrangement. Written 
objections should be directed to the above address.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19477 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|February 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ JACK D. MASSIMINO               
|                 |  |  |  | Jack D. Massimino                   
|                 |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                 |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

 

 January 30, 2014

Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs–2014

Message from the Director

It is my honor and privilege to present the 2014 update to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. 

Since its initial release in 1999, CDC’s Best Practices has provided a blueprint for 

comprehensive tobacco program planning. The series has been effective for program and 

strategic planning, for education and training, and for guiding work with policymakers. 

We expect that this update, Best Practices–2014, will continue this strong tradition. 

Statewide comprehensive tobacco control programs that are sustained over time have been 

shown to work: they reduce smoking rates, tobacco-related diseases and deaths, protect people 

from secondhand smoke exposure, encourage smokers to quit, and prevent youth from starting to 

smoke in the first place. Best Practices–2014 is a guide based on the best available knowledge 

and science that can help states plan and establish comprehensive tobacco control programs that 

achieve these goals.

This update to Best Practices is needed to better reflect our current understanding of the science 

of tobacco control. In many areas, we know how to do things better, more efficiently, and with 

greater reach. Best Practices–2014 reflects this knowledge. Furthermore, CDC believes that Best 

Practices–2014 will provide important information and clarity for state comprehensive tobacco 

control programs at a time when federal, state, and local roles are especially dynamic. 

Fifty years after the 1964 Surgeon General’s report first confirmed the link between smoking and 

lung cancer, we have come a long way in reducing the death and disease from tobacco use. Adult 

smoking prevalence has dropped from over 40 percent to under 20 percent—and in some states, 

less than 15 percent. Twenty six states and the District of Columbia have comprehensive, 

statewide smoke-free air laws that protect everyone from being exposed to deadly secondhand 

smoke. Nationwide changes, such as the Affordable Care Act and the Family Smoking 

Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, promise systemic reforms that will make cessation services 

more accessible and prevent youth and young adults from starting to use tobacco. 

Public Health Service

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention (CDC)

Atlanta GA 30341-3724
However, wide geographic, occupational, and demographic disparities in smoking remain and 

only about half of U.S. residents live under state or local laws that make worksites, restaurants, 

and bars completely smokefree. We still have a long way to go before tobacco use is no longer 

the leading cause of preventable death in this country. Best Practices–2014’s guidance provides 

the map we need to get us there.

 

 Thank you, 

Tim McAfee, MD, MPH

Director, Office on Smoking and Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia