alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


Vaccine Information Statements (VISs)


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





About VISs										Related Pages
										clipboard list iconInstructions for Using VISRead and print an information sheet about the use of VISs, including recordkeeping requirements.clipboard check iconVIS FactsFind information about provider responsibilities, types of VISs, legal requirements for using VISs.comments alt iconVIS Frequently Asked QuestionsFind answers to commonly asked questions.
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  April 5, 2019					Content source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases VIS Home
Current VISs
What's New with VISs
About VISs
Instructions for Using VISs
Facts About VISs
Frequently Asked Questions
Dates of Current and Past VISs
VIS Barcodes Vaccines & ImmunizationsImmunization Schedules


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.12.5

                      FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


         This Fifth Amendment to License Agreement is dated effective as of May
18, 2005 and is made by and between Emerson Radio Corp. ("Licensor") and Funai
Corporation, Inc. ("Licensee").

         WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee are parties to that License Agreement
dated effective January 1, 2001, as amended (collectively, the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following:

                  1. Second Amended Exhibit A II of the Agreement. Amended
         Exhibit A, Section II of the Agreement shall be amended to read as set
         forth on the attached Second Amended Exhibit A.

         2. Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall
have the same meaning as in the Agreement.

          3. Counterparts. This Fifth Amendment and any future amendments may be
executed in several counterparts that together shall constitute but one and the
same document.

         4. All Other Provisions of the Agreement. All other provisions of the
Agreement not amended herein shall continue to have their full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fifth Amendment has been executed by the duly
authorized representative of each party effective as of the date first set forth
above.


EMERSON RADIO CORP.                                  FUNAI CORPORATION, INC.
"Licensor"                                          "Licensee"


By: /s/ John J. Raab                                By: /s/ Takeshi Ito
Name: John J. Raab                                  Name:    Takeshi Ito
Title: COO/Senior Executive Vice President          Title:   President
No. 11-5757.

#### Mindy Jaye Zied-Campbell, et vir, Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare.

565 U.S. 950, 132 S. Ct. 415,

181 L. Ed. 2d 271,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7281.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
# C_2014431EN.01001602.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Navarra — Spain) — Miguel Angel Zurbano Belaza, Antonia Artieda Soria v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA

(Case C-93/14) (1)

1

(2014/C 431/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2834 

To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2019 

Mr. ROUZER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee 

Coastal Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North 

Carolina, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub7 section (b) as are necessary to exclude lots from unit L06 

8 of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

9 in North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, that were serv10 iced by infrastructure, as described in subsection (c), inVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:16 May 30, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2834.IH H2834

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2834 IH

1 stalled along North Carolina Highway 210 and New River 

2 Inlet Road as of the date of enactment of the Coastal Bar3 rier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

4 (b) MAPS DESCRIBED.—The map referred to in sub5 section (a) is a map that— 

6 (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the 

7 John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

8 entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

9 System’’ and dated December 21, 2018; and 

10 (2) relates to unit L06 of the John H. Chafee 

11 Coastal Barrier Resources System. 

12 (c) INFRASTRUCTURE DESCRIBED.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

14 the infrastructure referred to in subsection (a) is in15 frastructure that meets the criteria described in sec16 tion 4(g)(1)(B) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

17 (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)). 

18 (2) INCLUSION.—For purposes of paragraph 

19 (1), North Carolina Highway 210 and New River 

20 Inlet Road shall be considered to meet the criteria 

21 described in section 4(g)(1)(B)(i) of the Coastal 

22 Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)(i)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3153 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation to support research 

on opioid addiction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2019 

Ms. WEXTON (for herself, Mr. BAIRD, Ms. DEAN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, and Mr. KILMER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation 

to support research on opioid addiction, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Expanding Findings for Federal Opioid Research and 

6 Treatment Act’’ or the ‘‘EFFORT Act’’. 

7 (b) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) research gaps currently exist in the preven9 tion and treatment of opioid addiction; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3153 IH

1 (2) the National Science Foundation’s research 

2 on opioid addiction has increased understanding of 

3 the neuroscience of addiction, substance abuse inter4 vention, the role of illicit supply networks, the sec5 ondary effects on families, the use of technology to 

6 address the opioid epidemic, and options for alter7 native, non-addictive therapeutics for pain; and 

8 (3) the National Science Foundation and the 

9 National Institutes of Health have recognized that 

10 fundamental questions in basic, clinical, and 

11 translational research would benefit greatly from 

12 multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration. 

13 SEC. 2. NSF SUPPORT OF RESEARCH ON OPIOID ADDIC14 TION. 

15 The Director of the National Science Foundation, in 

16 consultation with the Director of the National Institutes 

17 of Health, shall support merit-reviewed and competitively 

18 awarded research on the science of opioid addiction. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                                                      
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    JACK D. MASSIMINO                                                             
|             |  |  |  | Jack D. Massimino President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 11  FAMILY
DOLLAR STORES, INC.  STATEMENT RE
COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS  AS PRESENTED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
  
  FY 2002
  
  FY 2001
  
  FY 2000BASIC
  
  DILUTED
  
  BASIC
  
  DILUTED
  
  BASIC
  
  DILUTEDAVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
  FOR THE YEAR ENDED
  
  172,800
  
  172,800
  
  171,568
  
  171,568
  
  171,698
  
  171,698INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE
  EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
  
  $
  216,929
  
  $
  216,929
  
  $
  189,505
  
  $
  189,505
  
  $
  172,017
  
  $
  172,017NET INCOME
  
  $
  216,929
  
  $
  216,929
  
  $
  189,505
  
  $
  189,505
  
  $
  172,017
  
  $
  172,017EARNINGS PER SHARE:INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
  
  $
  1.26
  
  $
  1.26
  
  $
  1.10
  
  $
  1.10
  
  $
  1.00
  
  $
  1.00NET INCOME
  
  $
  1.26
  
  $
  1.26
  
  $
  1.10
  
  $
  1.10
  
  $
  1.00
  
  $
  1.00PRO FORMA DILUTION IMPACT
  OF COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTSADDITIONAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE
  SHARES FROM ASSUMED EXERCISEAT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR OF DILUTIVE STOCK
  OPTIONS
  
  
  
  4,882
  
  
  
  4,789
  
  
  
  3,943WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
  ASSUMED REPURCHASED FROMASSUMED
  PROCEEDS OF EXERCISES USING TREASURY STOCKMETHOD (AVERAGE MARKET PRICE)
  
  
  
  (3,633)
  
  
  
  (3,583)
  
  
  
  (2,992)NET PRO FORMA COMMON STOCK
  EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES
  
  
  
  1,249
  
  
  
  1,206
  
  
  
  951PERCENTAGE DILUTION FROM
  PRO FORMA COMMONSTOCK
  EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES
  
  
  
  0.72
  %
  
  
  0.70
  %
  
  
  0.55
  %TOTAL COMMON STOCK AND
  COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS
  
  
  
  174,049
  
  
  
  172,774
  
  
  
  172,649INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE
  EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
  
  
  
  $
  216,929
  
  
  
  $
  189,505
  
  
  
  $
  172,017NET INCOME
  
  
  
  $
  216,929
  
  
  
  $
  189,505
  
  
  
  $
  172,017PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER
  SHARE (INCLUDING DILUTIVECOMMON STOCK
  EQUIVALENTS):INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
  
  
  
  $
  1.25
  
  
  
  $
  1.10
  
  
  
  $
  1.00NET INCOME
  
  
  
  $
  1.25
  
  
  
  $
  1.10
  
  
  
  $
  1.00
Black History Month Spotlight: Gloria Edward
 
  By Lauren Faal, DLA Information Operations Research & Development
  Gloria Edwards brings a wealth of educational, military and professional experience to the Defense Logistics Agency, where she has found a meaningful mission and supportive team. Edwards is DLA Research & Development’s Subsistence Network program manager. SUBNET supports R&D projects that promote manufacturing improvements in subsistence areas like combat rations, food safety and water security. Edwards is currently managing six projects with industry and academia, ranging from automating barcode scanners to testing hot sauce laminate pouches for ready-to-eat meals. Reflecting over her career, Edwards said she has fond memories of attending Benedict College, a historically black college in Columbia, South Carolina. “I was a first-generation college student, so I didn’t initially know what to expect,” she said. “I had a great experience at Benedict because I was surrounded by people from similar backgrounds and shared cultural experiences.” At Benedict, she joined Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, the first sorority in the National Pan-Hellenic Council. Edwards is proud to be a member of this lifelong sisterhood alongside other notable members including Vice President Kamala Harris, Coretta Scott King and Rosa Parks. In 1986, she graduated with a bachelor’s degree in mathematics. “The [historically black college] experience shaped the person I am today,” Edwards said. After college, Edwards joined the Air Force. During her military career, she served in command, staff and operational positions in logistics, personnel and acquisition. She retired as a lieutenant colonel with 21 years of service in 2008. She first came to DLA as an Air Force plans officer and, following retirement, continued her professional growth in positions as a government contractor and logistics manager at the Pentagon before becoming an R&D program manager in 2015. She attributes her recent success to her diverse experiences, military background, advanced education and programmatic credentials. “DLA has afforded me the professional roles and responsibilities that contributed to my appreciation of our global mission to support our warfighters,” she said. Edwards said Black History Month is special to her because it offers a distinct opportunity to celebrate, acknowledge and honor her cultural past and reminds her to forge ahead with her goals. Hailing from South Carolina, she is a self-proclaimed true southern belle who enjoys the region’s distinctive traditions, cuisine and hospitality. “I enjoyed growing up surrounded by extended family,” Edwards said. “We lived within walking distance of each other, and it was the norm for relatives to praise, teach and discipline us. It was a village of folks who cared for and inspired us.” Within R&D, she said she has found a familiar environment in a small, tight-knit organization that fosters a supportive, familial spirit of inclusion and genuine care. “I am inspired by DLA’s support and tremendous impact on our partners, the services and whole-of-government,” she said.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 18

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
5555 Darrow Road
Hudson, Ohio 44236



Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended February 3, 2001.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

The Company changed from the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of accounting
for valuing inventories to the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. According to
the management of the Company, this change was made as FIFO is used by
substantially all of the Company's competitors, and, therefore, this change
facilitates more appropriate comparisons within its industry. Furthermore, this
change was due in an effort to simplify and provide more meaningful reporting to
lenders under the secured credit facilities the Company recently entered into.
The Company is required to report a borrowing base calculation using FIFO-based
inventory amounts. Additionally, this change was made to more appropriately cost
inventory in light of continuous interim price volatility in the prices of the
Company's inventory, thus providing more useful information to financial
statement users.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,


Arthur Andersen LLP


                                       95
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.R., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 11-5401.

#### Jesus Vega, Petitioner v. Marcus Hardy, Warden.

565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 306,

181 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5611.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 11M32.

#### Joel Thomas Steinmetz, Petitioner v. United States Postal Service, et al.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 444,

181 L. Ed. 2d 253,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7402.

October 11, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 10-10918.

#### Robert Edward Butler, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5880.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAY 20 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ERSILIA E. YURMANN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TOGO WEST, in his official capacity

as Secretary of the Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-2163

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1226-HB)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , McKAY , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff Ersilia E. Yurmann appeals from the district court’s entry of

summary judgment in favor of defendant on her claims filed under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. 

Appellant is employed by the Department of the Army at White Sands

Missile Range, New Mexico. She alleged that the Army wrongfully failed to

promote her based on sex discrimination and retaliation for protected activities. 

The district court granted summary judgment based on its finding that appellant

presented no evidence to show that the facially legitimate reasons defendant

produced for promoting another employee were a pretext for illegal

discrimination. 

The case is expressly narrowed on appeal. See Appellant’s Br. at 8. 

Appellant argues that the district court erred: (1) in finding that she presented no

evidence of pretext for the employee selection White Sands made; and (2) in

granting summary judgment on her sex discrimination claim instead of letting that

claim proceed to trial. 

“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, examining the record

and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to

the nonmoving party.” Templeton v. Neodata Servs., Inc. , 162 F.3d 617, 618

(10th Cir. 1998).
-3-

We have carefully reviewed the district court’s decision, the parties’ briefs,

and the record on appeal. We find no error, and affirm for substantially the same

reasons as those set forth in the district court’s memorandum opinion filed on

May 5, 1998.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge