alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-172-000]


South Georgia Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

January 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 7, 1998, as supplemented on January 15, 
1998, South Georgia Natural Gas Company, Post Office Box 2563, 
Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, filed in Docket No. CP98-172-000, a 
request, pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.212, and 157.216 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.212, and 157.216), for authorization to construct and operate 
modifications to an existing delivery point in Suwannee County, Florida 
for transportation service to its existing customer, Florida Power 
Corporation (Florida Power), under South Georgia's blanket certificate 
authorization issued in Docket No. CP82-548-000, pursuant to Section 7 
of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    South Georgia is proposing to add one 6-inch turbine meter and to 
replace the existing 3-inch regulators and monitors with 4-inch 
regulators and monitors at the existing meter station, known as Florida 
Power <SUP><greek-i></SUP>2, located at or near Mile Post 100.324 on 
South Georgia's 10-inch Main Line in Suwannee County, Florida.
    South Georgia estimates the total cost of the modifications to be 
$196,550, to be reimbursed to it by Florida Power. South Georgia 
estimates the annual volumes for deliveries will increase from 350,000 
Mcf to 1,050,000 Mcf, and the maximum daily delivery volumes will 
increase from 9720 Mcf to 29,160 Mcf per day.
    South Georgia states that it will transport gas on behalf of 
Florida Power under its Rate Schedule IT. South Georgia states that the 
installation of the proposed facilities will have no adverse effect on 
its ability to provide its firm deliveries.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1869 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ALDO ALVAREZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 10265

D.C. No. 4:19

- cr

- 00271

- HSG

- 3

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges

.

Aldo Alvarez appeal s from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty

- plea conviction and 12

- month

- and

- 1

- day sentence for possession with intent

to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine , in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)( A )

. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 10265

Alvarez ’ s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarez the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED

.
No. 10-11218.

#### In re Joseph Hall, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 394,

181 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6553.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**  No. 07 - 13 - 00202 - CV IN RE TERRY BLANKENSHIP , RELATOR 

### September 3 , 2013 ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before the court is the “application for writ of mandamus to compel defendants to answer prior motions for discovery and written discover y pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure” filed by Terry Blankenship, relator. We deny the application
. First, Texas Government Code § 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to writs necessary to enforce the juri sdiction of the court of appeals and writs against specified district or county court judges in the court of appeals’ district. T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004). Consequently, unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we have no juri sdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against individual parties
. See Id. § 22.221(b)
. Furthermore, relator has2 not shown how pursuing discovery in a trial court proceeding that has been dismissed affects this court’s jurisdiction. Next, r elator has not filed a record or an appendix with his petition. In an original mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to a relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.7(a)(1). Furthermore, a relator’s burden on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e]very statement of fact in the petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or record.” T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(g). In short, a relator must supply a record sufficient to establish the right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Relator has not done so and we are therefore unable to determine whether he is e ntitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the application for a writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.8. APPENDIX 3.8**

**INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT – DUAL (CONDITION/PURPOSE TRANSFER)**

## 

2

**AP3.8-**

AP3.8-1

APPENDIX 3.8
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


Training Development


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








Design										Related Pages
										The resources below will help you design and develop e-learning and classroom training that uses best practices in education science.Online TrainingE-learning design best practicesClassroom TrainingInstructor’s guide for adult learners
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  July 19, 2019						Source: 	Deputy Director for Public Health Science and Surveillance, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeTraining Development
Tools and Resources
ADDIE Model
Analyze
Designplus icon
Online Trainingplus icon
Engaging Recorded Webinars
Quality E-learning Checklist
Classroom Training
Evaluateplus icon
Training Effectiveness
Quality Training Standards
Professional Connections Find Training


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
#### *Bressler et al., Respondents, v. Sullivan et al., Petitioners,*

No. 92036-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72027-9-I, June 29, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1034. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
D

DLA Distribution Albany, Georgia

Mr. WIlliam Harrington

Deputy Director

William Harrington is a native of Compton, California, and is a retired Air 

Force Chief Master Sergeant. He began his logistics career in 1988 as an 

Inventory Management Specialist, where he served 30 years in progressively 

difficult and prestigious assignments, before retiring in 2018.

Harrington’s logistics experience includes tours in a wide range of positions 

in the Supply and Logistics Readiness arena to include the United Kingdom, 

Japan, Korea, Afghanistan, and the White House.

His civilian career begain in 2018 with the Department of Homeland Security 

in Tucker, Georgia, as the Operations Support Specialist. In May 2018, he 

quickly transitioned to a leadership position with Homeland Security in 

Wasnington D.C., where he served as Supervisory Data Analysis and Reporting Branch. In May 2019, he was hired 

by DLA Albany, Georgia to serve as Deputy Director.

Harrington holds a bachelor’s degree in business management and a master’s degree in management and 

organizational leadership. He holds numerous certifications to include Project Management, Six Sigma, Crucial 

Conversations for Senior Managers and Executive Leadersip and Management. He successfully completed the 

Advance Program in Logistics and Technology at the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill.

His military awards and decoration include the Bronze Star, Defense Meritorious Service Medal (2), Global War 

on Terrirism Expeditionary Medal, Air Force Accomodation Award (2), Joint Service Achievement Medal and the 

National Defense Service Medal Afghanistan.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Oster, Petitioner,*

No. 91329-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31859-1-III, January 20, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1031. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 29, 2013

t0522 

# Order

Clerk May 29, 2013

146183

JEFFREY JOHN CARSON,

Plaintiff

- Appe llee,

v SC: 146183

COA: 308291

Ingham CC: 10

- 001064

- NF

HOME

- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted.
No. 11-5121.

#### Arthur Ray Anderson, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

565 U.S. 890, 132 S. Ct. 271,

181 L. Ed. 2d 160,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5652.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 175.
CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge
(i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III                         
|                       |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                             
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                       | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Gary M. Adams                                
|                       |  | Gary M. Adams                                    
|                       |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



35
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6968
WILLIAM GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT; LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; NANCY GLENN; CHARLES MOORE; JUDY JOHNSON; T. MURRAY, Individually, and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-376-3-18BC) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Green, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen P. Hughes, HOWELL, GIBSON & HUGHES, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting him a thirty-day extension of time to note his appeal when he requested a 180-day extension. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Allied Steel v. Abilene, 909 F.2d 139, 142 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Evatt , No. CA-94-376-3-18BC (D.S.C. May 9, 1995). We note that although Appellant stated his intent to appeal from the order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint, he limited his notice of appeal to the order denying a further extension. Thus, this court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of that order. See Gunther v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 255 F.2d 710, 717-18 (4th Cir. 1958). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-10988.

#### John Albert Schmitz, Petitioner v. Minnesota.

565 U.S. 860, 132 S. Ct. 198,

181 L. Ed. 2d 104,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6310.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Exhibit 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Form
    
    Registration NumberS-8
    
    333-72445
    
    1998 Incentive Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-128157
    
    1998 Incentive Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-11653
    
    Employees Savings and Profit-Sharing PlanS-8
    
    333-55280
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Savings Plan 401(k)S-8
    
    333-137187
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Savings Plan 401(k)S-8
    
    333-151587
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation PlanS-8
    
    333-151609
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Associate Stock Ownership PlanS-8
    
    333-167550
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 112
No. 10-7531.

#### Bernard A. White, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

562 U.S. 1186, 131 S. Ct. 1011,

178 L. Ed. 2d 840,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 863.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-1555.

#### Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, Petitioner v. James Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board.

565 U.S. 810, 132 S. Ct. 82,

181 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6793.

October 3, 2011.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 1154.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on April 1, 1998, Aernol 
Pharmaceutical, Inc., 189 Meister Avenue, Somerville, New Jersey 08876, 
made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-Ethylamphetamine (1475)..................  I                          
Difenoxin (9168)...........................  I                          
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II                         
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to 
produce pharmaceutical products for its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than September 8, 1998.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-18217 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
A Becky le diagnosticaron epoc, cuando 

tenía tan solo 45 años. Ella tiene enfisema, 

bronquitis crónica y tuvo un colapso pulmonar. 

Ahora, está encadenada a un tanque de oxígeno 

las 24 horas del día. Y todo por fumar. 

Usted puede dejar de fumar.

Para recibir ayuda gratuita, llame al

1-855-DÉJELO-YA.

Si te sientes apegada a tus cigarrillos, 

solo espera a que tengas que andar 

con un tanque de oxígeno. 

Becky, 54 años, Ohio

#CDCConsejos
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,519
<SECURITIES>                                        29
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,281)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,573
<PP&E>                                         237,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                (60,533)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (46,556)
<BONDS>                                      (190,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (306,444)
<SALES>                                      (130,659)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (130,659)
<CGS>                                            5,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,838)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (3,279.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (3,279.24)


</TABLE>
exhibit_4-3.htm










Exhibit 4.3




 



	[Symbol of the Companies Registrar] 	[Symbol of the State of Israel]





 




State of Israel


 


Ministry of Justice – Corporations Authority


 


Companies & Partnerships Registrar


 


Certificate of Change of Name of Company


 


This is to certify that the Company


 


COMMTOUCH SOFTWARE LTD


 


COMMTOUCH SOFTWARE LTD


 


Number 520044181


 


has changed its name and it will henceforth be known by the name


 


CYREN LTD


CYREN LTD


 









 



	 
Given in Jerusalem on the date of:


February 9, 2014


9 Adar A  5774

	
 


[signature]


Aluma Katz



Corporations Authority



Companies & Partnerships Registrar



[Registrar's Seal]
No. 11-39.

#### Katharina Guenter Reimer, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 245,

181 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5216.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 472 Fed. Appx. 286.