alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
24.2                  Certificate


         I, KENNETH J. WARREN, hereby certify that I am the duly elected
Secretary of PH Group Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), and do
further certify that the following resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on January 21,
1998, and that such resolution has not been amended or rescinded, and is in full
force and effect:

         RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required to execute
an annual report on Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB (whether on behalf of the Company
or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) or any amendment or
supplement thereto be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute a power
of attorney appointing Charles T. Sherman, his or her true and lawful attorney
and agent to execute in his or her name, place and stead (in any such capacity)
the annual report and all amendments or reports necessary or in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to
have full power and authority to do and to perform in the name and on behalf of
each of said officers and directors, or both, as the case may be, every act
which is necessary or advisable to be done as fully, and to all intents and
purposes, as any such officer or director might or could do in person; ...

         Dated this 30th day of March, 1999.

                              /s/ KENNETH J. WARREN
                              ------------------------------
                              Kenneth J. Warren
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In Re: Purported Mechanical and

Materialman’s Lien Claim of Lien Against

Pellicano Business Park, L.L.C.

,

Appellant. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00291

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2012

- DCV06341 )

O R D E R

Appellant, Rosa Serrano, has filed a motion to recuse the Court in the above

- styled and

numbered appeal. She also requests that we transfer the appeal to the Third Court of Appeals in

Austin, Texas. The basis for the motion is that the Court denied Appel lant’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus in cause number 08

- 17

- 00044

- CV, styled In re Rosa Serrano . Appellant’s motion

is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24 th day of October , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ
1 of 2 

ADC 173 

Attachment 

Approved DLMS Change 173 

Administrative Correction to DLMS Supplement 846A, Asset Reclassification 

(Supply) 

1. ORIGINATOR:

 a. Service/Agency: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO) 

 b. Originator: Mary Jane Johnson, DLMSO, Email: Mary.Jane.Johnson@dla.mil.

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply 

3. REQUESTED CHANGE:

 a. Title: ADC 173, Administrative Correction to DLMS Supplement 846A, Asset 

Reclassification (Supply) 

 b. Description of Change: This update deletes code “ABR – Assigned by Receiver 

in the LQ segment of DLMS Supplement (DS) 846A; and provides an administrative 

update to delete a DLMS note in the LIN segment. 

c. Procedures: Revise DS 846A as follows: 

 Item # Location DS 846A Revision 

Asset Reclassification 

Reason Federal IC 

Impact 

1. 2/LIN02/010 Delete DLMS note at code FS-National Stock 

Number

Administrative 

change for 

consistency with 

other DS and to 

remove a note 

conflict. 

The DLMS note at 

LIN02 Code FS (“Must 

use NSN when 

known.”) duplicates the 

purpose of, and 

conflicts with, DLMS 

note 1at the LIN02 

reference ID level 

which states “...Must 

use NSN when known, 

except when 

appropriate brand name 

subsistence items are 

identified by the 

Subsistence 

Identification Number.” 

No impact. 
2 of 2 

ADC 173 

Attachment 

Item # Location DS 846A Revision 

Asset Reclassification 

Reason Federal IC 

Impact 

2. 2/LQ01/376 Deleted code ABR and DLMS note: 

Federal Note: Use to identify the Materiel 

Management Aggregation Code (MMAC). 

DLMS Note: 

Use to identify the MMAC for NSNs to be 

managed by a specific manager (i.e., system, 

program, aggregation, selected FSC, technology 

group). This is an Air Force-unique data element, 

meaningful to the Air Force only. Non-Air Force 

Components perpetuate without action. An ANSI 

data maintenance request has been prepared to 

request a new data element 1270 code qualifier 

assignment for the MMAC. The code source 

identified as the Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 23-

110, Volume 1.

Administrative 

correction delete 

duplicate note. Same 

note is represented by 

code “GQ” 

No impact. 

(The Federal 

note “Use 

any code” 

has been 

applied in 

this position 

therefore 

code “ABR” 

does not 

need to be 

deleted at 

the Federal 

level) 

4. ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES:

 a. Advantages: Administrative correction to reflect accurate code and note in DS 

846A. 

 b. Disadvantages: None. 

5. IMPACT: DOD 4000.25-M, DLMS Supplement 846A. No revision required to 

846A Federal IC.
No. 11-5547.

#### Terrell C. Oden, Petitioner v. Mike Knowles, Warden.

565 U.S. 913, 132 S. Ct. 327,

181 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5847.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 594.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3833-3834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90-466; RM-7327, RM-7987, RM-7988, RM-8705]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Hondo, Hollywood Park, Dilley, 
Bandera, Pleasanton, Karnes City, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 3834]]

SUMMARY: This document denies the petition for reconsideration filed by 
Reding Broadcasting Company of the Report and Order, 57 FR 56515 
(November 30, 1992), in which the Commission dismissed Reding's 
counterproposal proposal requesting the substitution of 253C2 for 
Channel 252A at Pleasanton, Texas and the modification of Station KBUC-
FM's (formerly KBOP-FM) license accordingly, the substitution of 
Channel 276A for Channel 252A at Bandera, Texas; the allotment of 
Channel 276C2 to Karnes City, Texas; and the substitution of Channel 
290A for Channel 253A at Hondo, Texas. This document affirms the Report 
and Order's determination that Reding's counterproposal was 
unacceptable for filing because under the Commission's Rules and the FM 
Agreement between the United States and Mexico in effect at the time of 
filing, Reding's proposals for Channel 276A at Bandera, and Channel 
290A at Hondo were short-spaced to Mexican FM allotments. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 27, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No 90-466, adopted December 30, 
1997, and released January 9, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased 
from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription 
Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1839 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
--------------------------------------------------------


Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries
Parsippany, New Jersey

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.33-63515, 333-132812 and 333-132815) of Emerson Radio
Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated July 13, 2006, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Emerson
Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and for the year then ended,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ Moore Stephens, P.C.
----------------------------
Cranford, New Jersey

July 14, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Intralog, Inc., 1500 San Remo Avenue, Suite 253, Coral Gables, FL 
33146, Officers: Dieter J. Bartels, President, Samuel J. Mow, Vice 
President
D.L. Wilco, 1001 Rio Bravo, Houston, TX 77064, Damon Lavelle Wilson, 
Sole Proprietor
Call Trans USA Inc. d/b/a Quality Express, Inc., 1360 Landmeier Road, 
Elk Grove, IL 60007, Officer: Hee Kyum Lee, President

    Dated: July 15, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19322 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.39. APPENDIX 3.39**

**PRE-POSITIONED MATERIEL RECEIPT –OTHER THAN PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT SOURCE**

## 

2

**AP3.43-**

AP3.39-1

APPENDIX AP3.39
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The
Corporate Executive Board Company (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ James J. McGonigle    /s/ Timothy R. Yost
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3207 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3207

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                  Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT DYLAN ELCHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3207

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                  Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.
```
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00321

- CV

IN RE LUETIA ACORD

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Relator’s Motion for

Emergency Stay is dismissed as moot.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Petition Denied

Opinion delivered and filed September 26 , 2019

[OT06]
No. 11-5694.

#### A. M., Jr., Petitioner v. Mental Health Board of the 11th Judicial District.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 341,

181 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7090.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.

Same case below, 281 Neb. 482, 797 N.W.2d 233.
No. 11-5135.

#### Alton Leonard Slater, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273,

181 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5465,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-5300.

#### Miladin Dobric, Petitioner v. David J. Baron.

565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 294,

181 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5649,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 70 App. Div. 3d 830, 892 N.Y.S.2d 900.
DLA FORM 1842-A, FEB 2008 PDF (DLA)

MONTHLY SUMMARY FORM - OUTSTANDING SAFETY ITEMS

While evaluating your area, be sure to look at the environment from the child's age perspective as well as program type.

Program/Center & Room Number Room Lead Type of Room/Age Group Monthly Reporting Period

Date of Inspection Item Inspector Corrective Action Needed Date of Corrective

Action
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFtCE OF


AR AND RADIATrcN 

Ms. Shannon Baker-Branstetter 

Policy Counsel, Energy and Environment 

Consumers Union, Policy and Action from Consumer Reports 

1101 17th Street, N.W., Suite 500 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Dear Ms. Baker-Branstetter: 

Thank you for your letter of November 5, 2013, urging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to 

promptly finalize the rulemaking for "Tier 3" light-duty vehicle emissions and gasoline standards. The 

EPA is developing the Tier 3 standards to respond to the critical need to improve air quality and to 

enable a harmonized national vehicle emissions control program. The EPA shares your goal of reducing 

air pollution across the United States, and the Tier 3 standards have the potential to achieve significant 

benefits. 

This Tier 3 rule would reduce motor vehicle emissions and help state and local areas attain and maintain 

the existing health-based air quality standards in a cost-effective and timely way. The reductions in 

ozone and particulate matter would avoid premature mortality and other health impacts, including 

respiratory symptoms in children and exacerbation of asthma. A timely Tier 3 program is critical to 

addressing the impacts of motor vehicles on air quality and public health; therefore, we are working to 

finalize the Tier 3 rule as expeditiously as possible and currently intend to issue the final rule in 

February 2014. 

Again, thank you for your letter and for your continued support of the Tier 3 program. I appreciate your 

commitment to achieving clean air for all Americans, and I look forward to continuing to work together 

towards that goal.

Office Qf Transportation and Air Quality 

Internet Address (URL) . http //wwwepagov


Recycled/Recydable Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3173 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that institutions hosting 

a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps provide instruction 

in STEM fields, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that 

institutions hosting a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ 

Training Corps provide instruction in STEM fields, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting STEM in 

5 JROTC Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAINING CORPS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2031(b)(3) of title 10, 

8 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘and which 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3173 IH

1 includes instruction or activities in the fields of science, 

2 technology, engineering, and mathematics’’ after ‘‘dura3 tion’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Order filed July 19, 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00423

- CV

____________ JOSE R

. VAZQUEZ , Appellant

V.

RENE FLORES , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1108504



### O R D E R Appellant’ s brief was due July 9, 2018

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 20, 2018
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
No. 11-5206.

#### Luis Guzman, Petitioner v. Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

565 U.S. 895, 132 S. Ct. 281,

181 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5595.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3333 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the United States Postal 

Service to receive approval from local governments before relocating 

any post office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require the United 

States Postal Service to receive approval from local governments before relocating any post office, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Post Office 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3333 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECTION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 404 of title 39, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(f) In addition to the requirements of subsection (d), 

6 before relocating any post office, the Postal Service— 

7 ‘‘(1) shall provide a period of not less than 30 

8 days for comment from the governments of the town 

9 and county, or if there are no such governments, the 

10 government of the State, in which the post office is 

11 located; 

12 ‘‘(2) provide to such governments a list, not to 

13 be made available to the public, of each proposed re14 location site; and 

15 ‘‘(3) may not relocate such post office without 

16 receiving prior written approval from such govern17 ments with respect to such relocation and the site 

18 proposed for such relocation.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub20 section (a) shall apply to any post office proposed for relo21 cation on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3:



RELIABILITY INCORPORATED
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS













We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26659) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 26, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Reliability Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.











|                             | BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|---------------------------- | ----------------------
|                             |                       
|                             |                       
|                             |                       
|Houston, Texas
March 9, 2001 |                       











































41
No. 10-1421.

#### Timothy S. Vernor, Petitioner v. Autodesk, Inc.

565 U.S. 820, 132 S. Ct. 105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6875.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 621 F.3d 1102.