alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! 

Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 WWPC Los Angeles, California 90009 Re: Request for Grant Reimbur.lement for AlP Project No. 3-06-0239-06(11) Dear Mr. Wrthycombe: On August 13, 2002 the City of Santa Monica submitted the Final OU11ay and Request for Reimbursement form and the final Construction Report for the above referenced project. The amount of the grant reimbursement request totaled $240,600. This AlP project represented the last federally funded capital improvement project as recognized in the 1984 Settlement Agreement. Following the City's submittal of this request, I was contacted by John Milligan who informed me that the FAA had decided to withhold the grant reimbursement pending the outcome of the Notice of Investigation (FAA Docket No. 16-02-08) initiated by the FAA an October 8, 2002. The requested reimbursement funds represent a substantial amount of revenue that could be utilized for muchKneeded and differed airfield maintenance projects. I implore the FAA to reconsider this matter and approve the requested grant reimbursement so the funds can be used to enhance and maintain the Santa Manica Airport As always, I truly appreciate your help .and assistance in these types of matters. lf you have any questions or desire further clarification regarding this matter, please don't hesitate to contact me at (310) 458-8772. Sincerely, ~~- Bob Trimbom Airport Manager Santa Monica Airport cc: David Bennett OPTIONAL FORM 99 (7~!l'Jl FAX TRANSMJTTAL )\
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: January 29, 2015 1 05564

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEVIN DEVAULT, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: December 16, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Gail B. Rubenfeld, Monticello, for appellant. James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Katy Schlichtman of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Lynch, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered May 22, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of course of sexual conduct in the first degree, course of sexual conduct in the second degree, rape in the second degree and incest in the second degree. In satisfaction of a 17-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to course of sexual conduct in the first degree, course of sexual conduct in the second degree, rape in the second degree and incest in the second degree. Defendant also executed a written waiver of his right to appeal. Following the denial of defendant's motion to vacate the plea, County Court sentenced him to an aggregate term of 25 years in prison, to be followed by 20-2- 105564

years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals. We affirm. Initially, we reject defendant's argument that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. Any ambiguity in County Court's discussion of the waiver was resolved by the written waiver and defendant's oral confirmation that he both had signed the written waiver in the presence of counsel and was waiving his right to appeal voluntarily (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Fling, 112 AD3d 1001, 1002 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 1020 [2014]; see also People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 266-267 [2011]). Defendant's sole remaining challenge on this appeal is that his plea must be deemed involuntary inasmuch as his recitation of the facts did not establish the elements of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty. This argument amounts to a challenge to the facial sufficiency of his plea and is barred by defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal and his failure to preserve the issue by raising it in his motion to withdraw his plea (see People v Long, 117 AD3d 1326, 1326-1327 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1003 [2014]; People v Mydosh, 117 AD3d 1195, 1196 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 963 [2014]). Moreover, this is not the "rare case" that comes "within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement" inasmuch as defendant's factual recitation did not actually negate an essential element of the crime to which he pleaded (People v Worden, 22 NY3d 982, 985 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see People v Mydosh, 117 AD3d at 1196; People v Teele, 92 AD3d 972, 972 [2012]). Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
No. 11-5488.

#### In re Richard Mercaldo, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 395,

181 L. Ed. 2d 249,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6418.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Tax-Exempt Certificate for Purchase of Kerosene

Commercially Contracted Maintenance, Modification or Repair Center

General Certificate Requirements:

I hereby certify that I am the of (Authorized Agent)

and the Company has a contract for the (Company Name) 

maintenance, modification, or repair of Department of Defense owned aircraft. The contract information follows:

Contract Number: 

Contract Start Date: Contract End Date: 

Place of Performance: 

I hereby certify that: Check the applicable type of purchase.

 the article or articles purchased in the accompanying order, or on the reverse side hereof, (or)

 all purchases placed by the Company for the period commencing: 

and ending , (Start Date) (End Date)

(a period not to exceed 12 calendar months), are, or will be used only for fuel supplies or legitimate equipment on an aircraft owned 

by the United States Department of Defense. 

Certification Of Use: Check the applicable type of purchase.

In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Revenue Ruling 76-58, the following uses of kerosene in support of maintenance, 

modification or repair of Department of Defense owned aircraft are tax-exempt or tax-free. Please check all uses of kerosene that 

apply to this certificate.

 Fuel used in the manufacturing, inspection, stationary testing, and ground testing of DOD-owned aircraft or legitimate 

equipment on an aircraft. This work may include incorporation of engineering changes, completion of work after the aircraft 

has left the factory, performance of electronic systems, functional tests, fueling operations, engine trim and test, shakedown 

and preflight operations including preflight engine run.

 In flight testing of new or repaired aircraft before acceptance in aircraft that are owned by the United States or a foreign 

nation and are part of the armed forces. 

 First tank fill-up of new or repaired aircraft that has been accepted for use by the armed forces of the United States or a 

foreign country and becomes a part of the armed forces thereof.

I understand that if the articles are used for any purpose other than as stated in this certificate, or are resold or otherwise disposed of, I 

must report such fact to the Defense Energy Support Center. I understand that this certificate may not be used in purchasing articles 

for use as fuel supplies, etc., on pleasure vessels, or on any type of aircraft except that aircraft owned by the United States and 

constituting a part of the armed forces.

I understand that the fraudulent use of this certificate to secure exemption will subject me and all parties making such fraudulent use 

of this certificate to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, together with costs of 

prosecution. I also understand that I must be prepared to establish by satisfactory evidence the purpose for which the article was used.

Defense Energy Support Center Account Number (If Known) 

Address Of Company 

EIN

Printed Or Typed Name Of Person Signing

Title Of Person Signing

Signature And Date Signed

Telephone Number
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service


Notice of Actions and Considerations to Assure Year 2000 
Compliance

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice serves to clarify Rural Utilities Service (RUS) 
policies related to the processing of electric and telecommunications 
loans in light of the year 2000 problem.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Orren E. Cameron III, Acting Assistant 
Administrator, Telecommunications Program, Rural Utilities Service, 
1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1590, Room 4056, South Building, 
Washington, DC. Telephone: (202) 720-9554. Facsimile: (202) 720-0810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is given that RUS is undertaking to 
address with its electric and telecommunications borrowers year 2000 
compliance issues that may affect the operations of RUS-financed rural 
electric and telecommunications systems. Year 2000 compliance means 
that performance and functionality of the electric and 
telecommunications systems, including computer software, software 
systems, and firmware, will not be affected by dates before, during, 
and after the year 2000. Because electric and telecommunications 
services are critical to public health and safety, electric and 
telecommunications providers must protect against any possible 
consequences of the year 2000 problem. RUS therefore has taken or will 
be taking the following actions:
    (1) RUS has surveyed all electric and telecommunications borrowers 
to learn how many cooperatives and companies were prepared or preparing 
for the year 2000 and RUS is in the process of contacting all electric 
and telecommunications borrowers in a general review to help ensure 
that no RUS-financed electric or telecommunications systems will be 
affected by the date change.
    (2) RUS has, by letter dated May 15, 1998, provided borrowers with 
a suggested provision addressing the year 2000 compliance for inclusion 
in specifications when purchasing new or upgraded central office 
switches and transmission equipment.
    (3) In reviewing applications for electric and telecommunications 
loans, RUS is seeking assurance that the applicant has a satisfactory 
plan for year 2000 compliance.
    (4) RUS will work closely with applicants for electric and 
telecommunications loans to ensure that loans necessary to ensure year 
2000 compliance will be acted upon in a timely fashion.

    Dated: July 16, 1998.
Wally Beyer,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 98-19522 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
No. 10-10754.

#### Stacy W. Howard, Petitioner v. William R. Byars, Jr., Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 168,

181 L. Ed. 2d 81,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5980.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 942.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01697]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending December 
21, 2013

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0218.
    Date Filed: December 18, 2013.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Recommended Practice 1630.
    Finally Adopted Resolution dated 17 December 2013.
    CSC Mail Vote (S076) dated 23 August 2013.
    Intended effective date: 18 February 2014.

 Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-01697 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chiefexecutive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19409]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 5, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Edward L. Clemons, Hazard, Kentucky; to acquire voting shares of 
Marie R. Turner Holding Company, Jackson, Kentucky, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Jackson, Jackson, 
Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 16, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19409 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7476

RICHARD LEE MULLEN, #143838,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE P. DODSON, Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; ALBERT CRAMER, Physician,

Coffeewood Correctional Center; VIRGINIA

SMITH, Nurse, Coffeewood Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-566-R)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lee Mullen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Mullen v. Dodson, No. CA-97-566-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 31, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Blythe A. Friedley, New Washington, Ohio; Debra K. Hickenlooper, 
Apollo Beach, Florida; Scott McDougal, New Washington, Ohio; Keith 
McDougal, Cincinnati, Ohio; Todd McDougal, New Washington, Ohio; Blythe 
A. Friedley, New Washington, Ohio, as trustee of The Rolland W. 
Friedley Trust; Blythe A. Friedley, New Washington, Ohio, as trustee of 
The Arlene M. Friedley Trust; Douglas and Marjorie MacGillivary, 
Bellefontaine, Ohio; Mathew and Kathryn Yackshaw, North Canton, Ohio; 
Douglas and Amy Boy, Bellefontaine, Ohio; Timothy and Kristine Shannon, 
Boardman, Ohio; John and Linda Stoner, Bellefontaine, Ohio; Karen 
Young, Bellefontaine, Ohio; and Sandra McDonald, Bellefontaine, Ohio; 
all to acquire voting shares of Union Bancorp., Inc., West Mansfield, 
Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire Union Banking Company, West 
Mansfield, Ohio.
    2. Charles Boyd Brown III, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Hilda Loresch 
Brown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Marilyn Justice Brown, Newton, 
Massachusettes; and Katherine Turner Adair, Hobe Sound, Florida; all to 
acquire voting shares of Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Allegheny 
Valley Bank of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 13, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19036 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**DoD 4000.25-8-M**

**11 MARCH 1997**

DLM 4000.25, Volume 6, June 5, 2012

**APPENDIX 2.10**

**DELETION TO MAPAD FOR MAP GRANT AID (MA3)**

## 

2

**AP2.**

AP2.10-2

APPENDIX 2.10
EXHIBIT 24
 
 
 RE:
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Commission File No. 1-6695
1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K
   Date
    
    
    
    Date/s/ Darrell Webb
    
    April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Frank Newman
    
    April 16, 2009Darrell Webb
    
    
    
    Frank Newman/s/ James Kerr
    
    April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ David Perdue
    
    April 16, 2009James Kerr
    
    
    
    David Perdue/s/ Scott Cowen
    
    April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Beryl Raff
    
    April 16, 2009Scott Cowen
    
    
    
    Beryl Raff/s/ Joseph DePinto
    
    April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Alan Rosskamm
    
    April 16, 2009Joseph DePinto
    
    
    
    Alan Rosskamm/s/ Ira Gumberg
    
    April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Tracey T. Travis
    
    April 16, 2009Ira Gumberg
    
    
    
    Tracey Travis/s/ Patricia Morrison
    
    April 16, 2009Patricia Morrison
No. 10-11127.

#### Paul Gunter, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 218,

181 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6730.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 459 Mass. 480, 945 N.E.2d 386.
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

Master Drainage System Phase 2

2006 Bond Election

Presented by: Godfrey Garza, Jr., District Manager
September, 1967

Hurricane Beulah

Category 3

Formed September 5, 1967

Highest winds 160 mph (260 km/h)

$1.2 billion (2005 dollars)


City of Harlingen
Mercedes Home
Floodway Break

South of Mercedes
Vasquez Home

In Mercedes
Drive-in Café Pharr
Flooded Home South of Pharr
Sign Located on U.S. 281 between Pharr/Edinburg
McAllen-Miller Airport
McAllen-Miller Airport
McAllen-Miller Airport
Balboa Acres - McAllen
Farm between McAllen & Hidalgo
View of Rio Grande West

From Hidalgo
Anzalduas Dam

(09/24/67)
Anzalduas Dam

(09/24/67)
Lloyd Bentsen Home

Located on South Bentsen Road

(09/24/67)
Los Ebanos

Port of Entry

(09/24/67)
HCDD No. 1 Census & Valuations

Year

1970

1974

2000

2006

Population

180,904

224,000

569,000

678,275

Valuation

$ 143,634,465

$ 203,832,710

$ 10,706,899,519

$ 19,369,952,837
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

September 24, 2006

Rainfall Event
La Blanca (Weslaco)

A - Facing South

B – Facing North

C – Facing Northeast

Intersection of SH 107 & North Lateral Drain

A

B

C
South Main

Intersection of FM 493 & South Main Drain

A

Facing Northwesterly

B

Facing Northwesterly
Panchita

Between 491 & Mile 17 – Main Floodwater Channel

A

Facing Southwesterly

B

Facing Southwesterly
Panchita

Between FM 491 & Mile 17 – Main Floodwater Channel

A – Facing West

B – Facing East

C – Facing West on Control Structure

D – Panchita Structure spillway into IBWC

A

B C

D
Panchita

Between FM 491 & Mile 17 – Main Floodwater Channel

Facing East on Control Structure
Bridge #25

West of FM 1425 – Main Floodwater Channel

A – Facing West

B – Facing South

A C
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

2006 Bond Election
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

Raymondville Drain

System Improvements
Raymondville Drain
2006 Bond Election
2006 Bond Election
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

Mission Inlet

System Improvements
Mission Inlet System Improvements
Hidalgo County Drainage 

District No. 1

IBWC

Rio Grande River Levee Rehab

Program
Peñitas to Anzalduas Dam

LRGFCP Rehabilitation Estimate

Levee Reach Miles Cost

Peñitas to Anzalduas Dam 3.74 $10 M

Penitas

Bentsen Palm

Development

Bentsen

State Park

Veteran

Cemetary

City of Mission

Community

of Madero

Seven Oaks

Country Club

Chimney

Park

Spillway

Floodway

Anzalduas Park
2006-Bond

Election

Thank you

For attending!
No. 10-10504.

#### Andre Cole, Petitioner v. Don Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, et al.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 147,

181 L. Ed. 2d 65,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6016.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 623 F.3d 1183.
No. 11-5180.

#### Kenneth Frank McHugh, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 278,

181 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5629.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 1250.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 11-1115 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ZHEN ZHOU WU, a/k/a ALEX WU,

Defendant, Appellant.

No. 11-1141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v. 

YUFENG WEI, a/k/a ANNIE WEI,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on March 19, 2013, should be

amended as follows.

On page 21, line 3 of 1st full paragraph, replace "Richardson

Electronic" with "Richardson Electronics".