alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-5148.

#### Dennis John Campbell, Petitioner v. Social Security Administration.

565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 274,

181 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5619.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 477.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the
general partner of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 6, 2006



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson                                                                 
|Bruce M. Johnson                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
No. 10-10836.

#### Timothy Bell, Petitioner v. Thomas V. Gainer, et al.

565 U.S. 852, 132 S. Ct. 178,

181 L. Ed. 2d 89,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6014.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
## 2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
1-15-2008 

# W at che r v . P ott s vi l le Ar e a P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 04-4253

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du
. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" W at che r v . P otts v i l le Ar e a" (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1749. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1749

## NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 04-4253 & 04-4271 SHIRLEY WATCHER; CHARLES WATCHER, H/W
v. POTTSVILLE AREA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.; GARRY THOMAS LAUBACH Shirley Watcher; Charles Watcher, Appellants in 04-4253 Pottsville Area Emergency Medical Service, Inc., Appellant in 04-4271

—————————— On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 00-cv-01123) District Court: Hon. A. Richard Caputo

—————————— Before: SCIRICA, McKEE, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed September 18, 2007 is amended. Insofar as an error exists in the numbering sequence of the sections of the opinion, the section formerly designated I. 4 shall be redesignated as I. 3; the section formerly designated as III shall be redesignated as II; and the section formerly designated as IV shall be redesignated as III.

## 2 

## The second to the last sentence in the first full paragraph on page 5 is amended as follows: Even though the work environment she left was found to be “hostile” within the meaning of Title VII, the jury quite properly could have concluded that she was terminated because she was absent from work and failed to notify anyone of her absence, not because of age bias. For the Court, Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Dated: 15 January 2008 /cc:
Unassociated Document



Exhibit 10.9




 


Lilis Energy, Inc.


1900 Grant Street, Suite #720


Denver, CO   80203


 


June 6, 2014







T.R. Winston & Company


1999 Avenue of the Stars #2550


Los Angeles, CA 90067







Re:           Additional Investment in Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock







This letter agreement sets forth the agreement between Lilis Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) and T.R. Winston & Company (“TRW”) regarding investment by TRW in the Company’s Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company and TRW accordingly agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
The Company agrees, subject to final approval by its board of directors, to issue up to $15 million of additional Preferred Stock to TRW or their respective designees, on substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2014, by and among the Company and the investors set forth therein (the “Purchase Agreement”).













	
  

	
2.

	
TRW agrees that it or its designees will purchase an additional $15 million of Preferred Stock on substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement within ninety (90) days of the date hereof, in being understood that the proceeds of the sale of such Preferred Stock may be used by the Company to fund its working capital and for other general corporate purchases.












This letter agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, excluding its conflict of laws rules. This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall be considered an original. If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement, please so indicate by executing this letter in the space provided below.








	  	
Very truly yours


	  	  
	  	
LILIS ENERGY, INC.


	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ Abraham Mirman


	  	  	
Abraham Mirman


	  	
Its:

	
Chief Executive Officer












ACCEPTED AND AGREED







this 6th day of June, 2014








	  	
T.R. Winston & Company


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ G. Tyler Runnels


	  	
Name: 

	
G. Tyler Runnels


	  	
Title:

	
Chairman & CEO
#### Earl Lupfer, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Kissimmee Wholesale Grocery Company, a Bankrupt, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Jackson Grain Company, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 8, 1926.

*Johnson & Garrett,*for Plaintiff in Error;

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the eo;urt that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, -P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00 12 9

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

JOSE I GNACIO GARCIA

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justic es Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its District Attorney, the Honorable

Mark Skurka, has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). No decision of this

Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.2

Having dism issed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

21st day of June, 2012.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.32. APPENDIX 8.32**

**FOREIGN MILITARY SALES NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY REPLY DOCUMENT**

1

APPENDIX 3.32

AP8.32-1

APPENDIX 8.32
Zinc Offering

Item/Lot

1753A/PW-DC

1753B/PW-DC

1753C/PW-DC

1753D/PW-DC

1753E/PW-DC

Brand

Della-Campine

Della-Campine

Della-Campine

Della-Campine

Della-Campine

Della-Campine

Zinc Content %

98.56

98.56

98.56

98.56

98.56

98.56

Lead Content %

1.29

1.29

1.29

1.29

1.29

1.29

Net Wt. (Lbs)

39,548.00

39,888.00

40,716.00

39,850.00

40,265.00

Short Tons

19.774

19.944

20.358

19.925

20.133

Min. Bid (Lbs)

39,548.00

39,888.00

40,716.00

39,850.00

40,265.00

Location

Scotia, NY

Scotia, NY

Scotia, NY

Scotia, NY

Scotia, NY

Totals 237,591 118.796

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Unit of Measure................... Lbs Offering Posting Time............

November 29, 2021

November 30, 2021

9:30am

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Basic Ordering Agreement... Zinc Date of Posting...................

Grade................................. Prime Western Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Quality

Prime Western

Prime Western 

Prime Western

Prime Western

Prime Western

Prime Western

*Item 1753 offering quantities are approximate weights

1753F/PW-DC Scotia, NY 37,324.00 18.662 37,324.00
November 8, 2016

Dear Tribal Leaders:

I am pleased to announce that as of November 14, Jose T. Montero, MD, MHCDS, will serve as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Office for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support (OSTLTS) and as a CDC deputy director. Dr. Montero will also assume the role of the Designated Federal Official for CDC/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC).

Dr. Montero's extensive leadership experience in public health systems makes him an ideal choice to guide OSTLTS in its mission to support and strengthen the nation's health departments and public health system. Most recently, Dr. Montero served as vice president of Population Health and Health System Integration at Cheshire Medical Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock in Keene, New Hampshire. He is a former president of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, was director of Public Health for the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services for seven years, and served as New Hampshire's state epidemiologist for eight years. He worked closely with CDC as chair of the Social Determinants of Health Think Tank, a subgroup of the STLT Subcommittee to the Advisory Committee to the Director of CDC, and as a member of the CDC Advisory Committee to the Director to prevent tuberculosis in healthcare settings.
Dr. Montero fulfills several national public health roles, serving on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the Institute of Medicine's Roundtable on Population Health Improvement, the National Academy for State Health Policy, the New Hampshire Citizens Health Initiative, the Dartmouth Medical School Leadership Preventive Medicine Residency Advisory Committee, and the Foundation for Healthy Communities.

Dr. Montero earned a medical degree from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. He specialized in family medicine and completed his residency at the Universidad del Valle in Cali, Colombia. He has an epidemiology degree from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Bogota, Colombia, and a master of health care delivery science from Dartmouth College.

I want to thank John Auerbach, MBA, for serving as acting director of OSTLTS, as well as Ursula Bauer, PhD, for serving as the Designated Federal Official for the CDC/ASTOR  TAC. Their dedication and service during the search for a new director was invaluable and preserved the integrity of our government -to-government relationship.

Sincerely,
Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH Director, CDC
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Polaris Alpha, LLC 

Under Contract No. FA9543-09-D-0355 et al. 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

) 

) 

) ASBCA No. 61592 

) 

) 

Phillip R. Seckman, Esq. 

K. Tyler Thomas, Esq. 

Dentons US LLP 

Denver, CO 

Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Srikanti Schaffner, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Carson, CA 

ORDER OF DISlvlISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: June 13, 2019 

usff:!:!i? - Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61592, Appeal of Polaris Alpha, 

LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS· 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     51,449
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        143,338
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,124
<DEPOSITS>                                     193,479
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,854
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,450
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 220,124
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,092
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,436
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    95
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,623
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,757
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,866
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,290
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       975
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.24
<LOANS-NON>                                        687
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    87
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,750
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      220
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,522
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            178


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-22-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,978
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       928
<INVENTORY>                                     36,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,032
<PP&E>                                         220,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 510,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,818
<BONDS>                                        333,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   510,059
<SALES>                                         89,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,801
<CGS>                                           65,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,328
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND RAMIREZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of the

California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-55227

D.C. No. 5:00-cv-00195-VAP-SH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 15, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

 Raymond Ramirez appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. We affirm.

The California Supreme Court’s decision denying Ramirez’s habeas petition

was not an unreasonable application of the “narrow proportionality principle that

FILED

FEB 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

applies to noncapital sentences.” Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 20 (2003)

(internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). 

Possession of any quantity of illegal drugs is no less serious than the theft offenses

that the Supreme Court has found not to raise an inference of gross

disproportionality. See Taylor v. Lewis, 460 F.3d 1093, 1099 (9th Cir. 2006). Nor

does Ramirez’s criminal history raise such an inference, because an attempt to

restrain a victim in her home is “marked by . . . the threat of violence.” Solem v.

Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 292-93, 296 (1983). If the gravity of a petitioner’s triggering

offense and criminal history does not create an inference of gross

disproportionality, we need not proceed to intrajurisdictional and interjurisdictional

comparisons. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1004 (1991) (Kennedy, J.,

concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Rios v. Garcia, 390 F.3d 1082,

1086 (9th Cir. 2004). 

AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas W. Palmer and Julia Palmer, *Appellants,*v. Dade County Security Company, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 1, 1926.

*Bart A. Riley*and *M. H. Rosehouse,*for Appellants;

*Twyman, Scott*c& *McCarthy,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-5324.

#### Eunice Husband, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 901, 132 S. Ct. 297,

181 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5349.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 238.
No. 11-5059.

#### Matthew Bryant, Petitioner v. Mary Berghuis, Warden.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 264,

181 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5844.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. D-2596.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Robert J. Pleshaw.

565 U.S. 974, 132 S. Ct. 545,

181 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7621.

October 31, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 564 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 3054, 180 L. Ed. 2d 870, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4576.