alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

Majulah Investment, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with Annual Report of Majulah Investment, Inc. (the Company) onForm 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Ding Jie Lin,Principal  Executive Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Ding Jie Linand will be retained by Majulah Investment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated: June 25, 2018

 

By: /s/ Ding Jie Lin

Ding Jie Lin,

*Chief Executive Officer*

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

Majulah Investment, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with Annual Report of Majulah Investment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended February 28, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),I, Ding Jie Lin, Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ding Jie Lin and willbe retained by Majulah Investment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: June 25, 2018

 

By: /s/ Ding Jie Lin

Ding Jie Lin,

*Chief  FinancialOfficer*

(Principal  Financial Officer)
----

|   | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | Alkane, Inc. |                           |
|--------------------|--------------|--------------------------------|
|               |         |                           |   |
| Date: May 11, 2010 | By:          | /s/ Mathew Zuckerman      |   |
|               |         | Mathew Zuckerman               |   |
|               |         | Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |
|               |         |                           |   |

----
No. 11A215.

#### John Hobart Zentmyer, Applicant v. United States.

565 U.S. 939, 132 S. Ct. 443,

181 L. Ed. 2d 252,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7279.

October 11, 2011.

Application for a certificate of appealability, addressed to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court, denied.
<PAGE>

                              RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

                                     Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS







       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-47803) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated
Employee Stock Savings Plan and Trust and in the related Prospectus of our
report dated January 31, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Reliability Incorporated included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.






                                               BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP     


Houston, Texas
March 14, 1997
































                                         25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,948
<SECURITIES>                                       544
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     39,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,574
<PP&E>                                         229,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,912
<BONDS>                                        295,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,097
<SALES>                                        121,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,861
<CGS>                                           91,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer



I, Ness Lakdawala, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dectron Internationale;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  June 14, 2006



By:

_/s/ NessLakdawala____________________

Ness Lakdawala

Chief Executive Officer and President
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1617

_____________________________

EMANUEL L. O’NEAL,

Petitioner,

v.

THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

July 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Emanuel L. O’Neal, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
No. 10-10830.

#### Marlon Rafael Pino Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 852, 132 S. Ct. 178,

181 L. Ed. 2d 88,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6095.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 157.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3147

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide service dogs to veterans with mental 
            illnesses who do not have mobility impairments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2019

 Mr. Stivers (for himself, Mr. Cisneros, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Rutherford, and 
  Mr. Waltz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide service dogs to veterans with mental 
            illnesses who do not have mobility impairments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puppies Assisting Wounded 
Servicemembers Act of 2019'' or the ``PAWS Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE SERVICE 
              DOGS TO VETERANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESSES WHO DO NOT HAVE 
              MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS.

    Section 1714 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) The Secretary may provide a service dog to a veteran under 
subsection (c)(3) regardless of whether the veteran has a mobility 
impairment.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3238 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3238

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

  Mr. Ratcliffe (for himself, Mr. Himes, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. 
 Khanna, Mr. Steube, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cline, and Mr. Cooper) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interference with 
         voting systems under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending the Integrity of Voting 
Systems Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERFERENCE WITH VOTING SYSTEMS.

    Section 1030(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by adding ``or'' at the 
                end; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) that--
                            ``(i) is part of a voting system; and
                            ``(ii)(I) is used for the management, 
                        support, or administration of a Federal 
                        election; or
                            ``(II) has moved in or otherwise affects 
                        interstate or foreign commerce;'';
            (2) in paragraph (11), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking the period and inserting 
        a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) the term `Federal election' means any election (as 
        defined in section 301(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
        of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101(1))) for Federal office (as defined in 
        section 301(3) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 
        U.S.C. 30101(3))); and
            ``(14) the term `voting system' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 301(b) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 
        U.S.C. 21081(b)).''.
                                 <all>
```
OLYMPIAJ.SNOW E

MAIN E 15 4 RussfL L SENAT E OFFIC E BUILDIN G

(202 1 224-534 4 We b Site : http://snowe.senate.go v

DEPUT Y WHI P 

# Bnitc d^mte s Senat e WASHINGTON , D

C 20510-190 3 COMMITTEES : COMMERCE , SCIENCE , AN D TRANSPORTATIO N OCEANS , ATMOSPHERE , FISHERIE S AN D COAS T GUAR D SUBCOMMITTE E

FINANC E

• INTELLIGENC E RANKIN G MEMBER , SMAL L BUSINES S Augus t 24 , 201 0
Tod dM
. Homan , Directo r Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr
. Homan , r o C O
I a mwritin g to expres s m

y stron g support

fo r th e applicatio n submitte dby th e Auburn

Lewisto n Municipal Airport to th e Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportation' s Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s fo

r fundin g unde r

it s Smal l Communit

y Air Servic e Development

(SCASD ) program . Consisten t

wit h th e SCAS D program' s missio n t o brin g abou t additiona l air

service , th e Aubum-Lewisto n Municipal Airport seek s apartne r

in th e Departmen t

o f Transportatio n t o restor e viabl e local ai r

servic e t o th e central Main e regio n fo r th e firs t tim e i n over 2 0 years . Accordin g t o recen t

marke t researc h an dafeasibility study , ther e appear s t o b e sufficient deman dan dmarke t

siz e t o link

th e Aubum-Lewisto n catchmen t are ato th e national ai r transportatio n system . Th e Airport seek s t o ope n acentral Main e gateway fo r direc t Bosto n flight s t o complemen t

th e service s o f

th e Portlan dhub , with th e ultimat e goal o f growin g travele r option s whils t

improvin g ai r

servic e for

bot h urban marke t

areas . Th e community an dregio n believ e that

local ai r servic e i s avital componen t o f it s overal l economi c an dcommunity developmen t

mi x an dwill creat e an dretai n muc h neede djobs
. I t i s wit h thi s i n min dtha

t I len d m y suppor t t o thi s proposal
. Thank yo u fo r you r tim e an deffor

t on behal f

o f th e Aubum-Lewisto n Municipal Airport
. I urg e your

mos t carefii l consideratio n o f

thi s application , subjec t

t o al l applicabl e law s an d regulations , an das k

tha t yo u pleas e kee p me infomie do f th e statu s o f

th e revie w process . In additio n t o notifyin g m

y D C staff

, pleas e notif

y Mar k Konti o o f

m y Bango r staf f a t (207 ) 945

- 043 2 o r by e-mai l a

t mark_k6ntio@snowe.senate.go v whe n afinal determinatio n ha s bee n made
.

Sincerel y

OLYMIJIA J : SNOW E Unite dState s Senato r

AUBUR N Tw o GRgA

T FALL S PLAZ A SUIT E 7 B AUBURN

. M E 0421 0 (207 1 786-245 1 AUGUST A

. 4 0 WESTER N AVENUE , SUIT ^ 408 C AUGUSTA , M E 0433 0 (207 > 652-829 2 BANGO R ON E CUMBERLAN D PLACE , Surr t 30 6 BAWGOR , M E 0440 1 (207 ) 945-043 2 BlOOEFOR O 22 7 MAI N STREE T BIDOEFORO , M E 0400 5 (207 1 282-414 4

I N MAIN E CAL L TOLL-FRE E 1-800-432-159 9 PRINTE D O N RECYCLE D PAPE R PORTtJ^N D 3 CANA L PLAZA , Surr e 60 1 PORTLAND , M E 0410 1 (207 ) 874-088 3 MAIN E RELA Y SERVIC E TO D 1-955-332 3 PRESOU E ISL E 16 9 /ACADEM Y STREET , SUIT E 3 PRESOU E ISLE , M E 0476 9 (2071764-512 4
EXHIBIT 10.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended  December 31, 2002 of Elscint  Limited (the  "Company")  as filed with the
U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Commission") on the date hereof
(the  "Report")  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Uri Levin,  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            By:   /s/ Uri Levin
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name: Uri Levin
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Date: June 30, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to Elscint  Limited  and will be retained by Elscint  Limited and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-1304.

#### National Conference of Bar Examiners, Petitioner v. Stephanie Enyart.

565 U.S. 929, 132 S. Ct. 366,

181 L. Ed. 2d 232,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7026.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 1153.
1

NUMBER 13-15-00262-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHNNY OCANAS, Appellant,

v.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 267th District Court

of Calhoun County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Johnny Ocanas, appearing pro se, has filed a brief in this cause. On 

July 16, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his brief failed to comply with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and requested that appellant file an amended 
2

brief within ten days of that notice. Appellant did not file an amended brief, but instead 

filed a response to this Court’s notice consisting of three case citations. Appellant 

asserts that the brief previously filed is appellant’s “best effort.” 

We liberally construe pro se pleadings and briefs; however, we hold pro se litigants 

to the same standards as licensed attorneys and require them to comply with applicable 

laws and rules of procedure. Mansfield State Bank v. Cohn, 573 S.W.2d 181, 184–85 

(Tex. 1978); In re N.E.B., 251 S.W.3d 211, 211-12 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.). To 

do otherwise would give a pro se litigant an unfair advantage over a litigant who is 

represented by counsel. Shull v. United Parcel Serv., 4 S.W.3d 46, 53 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1999, pet. denied). 

Upon review of the appellant’s brief, we find that the brief contains numerous 

formal defects and that the case has not been properly presented. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.9. The brief fails to contain any of the headings and sections required by Rule 38.1 

and further: (1) does not state concisely and without argument the facts pertinent to the 

issues or points presented as required by Rule 38.1(d); (2) does not contain a clear and 

concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to the authorities 

and to the record; and (3) does not contain an appendix as required by Rule 38.1(j). 

Accordingly, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.9(a) and (b), 

we STRIKE appellant’s brief. Appellant is hereby ORDERED to file an amended brief 

with this Court that complies with the above rules within fifteen days from the date of this 

order. 

If appellant files an amended brief that fails to comply with this order of the Court

and the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit 
3

appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See 

id. 38.9(a). Under such circumstances, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution and appellant’s failure to comply with this Court’s directive and the appellate 

rules. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

the 29th day of July 2015.