alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 8/13/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Erika Wilson, EPA

SUBJECT: Meetings with states to clarify comments on 111(d) baseline data 

SUMMARY

Eight meetings were held in November 2014, February 2015, and March 2015 with particular 

states to clarify comments submitted to the docket related to NEEDS and eGrid. These meetings 

were attended by EPA headquarters and Regional staff (listed below) and state environmental 

and/or energy office technical staff.

Louisiana - 11/12 

North Carolina - 2/4

Wisconsin - 2/5

Ohio - 2/11

Mississippi - 2/12

Kansas - 2/19

Wyoming - 2/26

Arkansas - 3/12

EPA ATTENDEES

Mikhail Adamantiades – OAR/OAP/CAMD

Travis Johnson – OAR/OAP/CAMD

Jeremy Mark – OAR/OAP/CAMD

Erika Wilson – OAR/OAP/CAMD

Brian Fisher – OAR/OAP/CAMD (for Louisiana call only)

Ken Mitchell – Region 4 (for Mississippi and North Carolina calls)

Dave McNeill – Region 4 (for Mississippi and North Carolina calls)

Alexis Cain – Region 5 (for Ohio and Wisconsin calls)

Erin Newman – Region 5 (for Ohio and Wisconsin calls)

Rob Lawrence – Region 6 (for Arkansas call)

Mark Smith – Region 7 (for Kansas call)

Ward Burns – Region 7 (for Kansas call)

Carl Daly – Region 8 (for Wyoming call)

Laura Farris – Region 8 (for Wyoming call)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 38277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19144]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 1998 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 38277]]

                Memorandum of July 8, 1998

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 1406(b) of 
                the
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                the laws of the United States of America, including 
                section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I 
                hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense the 
                functions conferred upon the President by section 
                1406(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85).

                The authority delegated by this memorandum may be 
                redelegated not lower than the Under Secretary level.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, July 8, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-19144
Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 5000-04-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|            |  | 
|May 4, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ KENNETH S. ORD                                  
|            |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|            |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|            |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
117

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Rhode Island

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $12.8 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 1,800

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 15,600

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $640 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $132.1 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $46.7 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $178.8 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 7%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$3.8 $4.7 $3.62 $4.47

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$1.5 $2.1 $1.43 $2.00

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $2.8 $4.3 $2.67 $4.09

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$0.8 $1.1 $0.77 $1.06

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.4 $0.6 $0.39 $0.53

TOTAL $9.3 $12.8 $8.88 $12.15

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 29, 2007



/s/ Paul M. JoeckelName: Paul M. JoeckelTitle: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE BANK OF TEXAS, a Texas state

chartered bank, as successor

- in

- interest to the

original lender,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN FRANCIS LOPEZ, Counsel for

Defendants Perin Parabia and Sam Parabia,

Appellant,

v.

SAM PARABIA, an individual; PERIN

PARABIA, an individual; FARZIN

MORENA, an individual; CITIZENS

BUSINESS BANK, a California corporation;

AYER CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC., a New

York corporation; DOES, 1 through 10

inclusive,

Defendants. No. 21

- 55955

D.C. No.

3:14

- cv

- 03031

- L

- DHB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

MAY 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022

Pasadena, California

Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and HELLERSTEIN, * * District

Judge.

Attorney Stephen Lopez appeals the district court’s order that Lopez pay the

State Bank of Texas $19,575 as sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The parties

are familiar with the facts, so we do not recount them here.

Section 1927 authorizes monetary sanctions against an attorney who

“multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously .” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1927

. We agree that Lopez was slow to respond to the district court’s order to

produce the Parabia s ’ insurance policy, and that some of his objections and motions

failed to recognize prior rulings, causing delays. However, the delays attributable

to Lopez were not so extensive as to amount to an “unreasonabl[e] and vexatious[]”

multiplication of proceedings. Section 1927 should not be in terpreted to deter

zealous advocacy

. See In re Yagman , 796 F.2d 1165, 1182, amended by , 803 F.2d

1085 (9th Cir. 1986). Lopez’ s filings were supported by citations to pertinent legal

authority and had colorable legal merit. See Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.

,

929 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir. 1990) (en banc) (defining a frivolous finding as one

“ that is both baseless and made wi thout a reasonable and competent inquiry ”)

. In

** The Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.3

reversing the sanctions, we do not countenance Lopez’s approach and tactics.

REVERSED.
No. 10-11237.

#### Richard Calvin Gipson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 874, 132 S. Ct. 232,

181 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6451.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-1217.

No. 10-1325.

#### Richard A. Van Auken, Trustee, Petitioner v. Peter F. Wirth, et al. Richard A. Van Auken, Beneficiary, Petitioner v. Peter F. Wirth, et al.

565 U.S. 815, 132 S. Ct. 93,

181 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6931,

October 3, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
No. 11-44.

#### South Carolina, Petitioner v. Jack Edward Earl Parker.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 380,

181 L. Ed. 2d 239,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6220.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.

Same case below, 391 S.C. 606, 707 S.E.2d 799.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3094 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3094

 To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 South Orange 
        Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2019

 Mr. Soto (for himself, Mrs. Demings, and Mrs. Murphy) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 South Orange 
        Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL PULSE MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Pulse Memorial located at 1912 South Orange 
Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, is hereby designated as the ``National 
Pulse Memorial''.
    (b) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial designated by 
this section is not a unit of the National Park System and the 
designation of that national memorial shall not be construed to require 
Federal funds to be expended for any purpose related to the national 
memorial.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-30754

Summary Calendar

_____________________

JOHNNY L. JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORP.,

Defendant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana, Alexandria

USDC No. 1:06-CV-214

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny L. Jackson appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his claims against Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (“PBGC”). The

district court dismissed Jackson’s claims as barred by res judicata

because Jackson raised the same claims against PBGC in a previous

suit he filed in 2001. Jackson argues on appeal, as he argued

below, that the PBGC Appeals Board undervalued the amount of his

pension payments.

For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

Jackson’s claims are barred by res judicata because (1) the parties
2

in the previous suit and present suit, Jackson and PBGC, are

identical; (2) a court of competent jurisdiction rendered a prior

judgment against Jackson on February 24, 2003; (3) the February 24,

2003 judgment was final and on the merits; and (4) Jackson raises

the same claims against PBGC that he raised in the previous suit.

See Matter of Howe, 913 F.2d 1138, 1143-44 (5th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court dismissing

Jackson’s claims is

AFFIRMED.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency 

for International Development to prescribe the manner 

in which programs of the agency are identified overseas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2744 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USAID Branding 

3 Modernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR BRANDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the United 

6 States Agency for International Development (USAID) is 

7 authorized to prescribe, as appropriate, the use of logos 

8 or other insignia of the USAID Identity, or the use of 

9 additional or substitute markings including the United 

10 States flag, to appropriately identify, including as required 

11 by section 641 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

12 U.S.C. 2401), overseas programs administered by the 

13 Agency. 

14 (b) AUDIT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 

15 the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the 

16 United States Agency for International Development shall 

17 submit to Congress an audit of compliance with relevant 

18 branding and marketing requirements of the Agency by 

19 implementing partners funded by the USAID, including 

20 any requirements prescribed pursuant to the authorization 

21 under subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Administrator of the United 

poses. agency are identified overseas, and for other purprescribe the manner in which programs of the States Agency for International Development to
#### People v Ortiz (Jovan)

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 592 (NY)

denied 8/26/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
No. 11-239.

#### Milton Samuels, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 256,

181 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5466.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 27.
No. 11-5176.

#### Wesley T. Frasher, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 278,

181 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5525.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 450.
No. 11-125.

#### Cynthia Holmes, Petitioner v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 943, 132 S. Ct. 402,

181 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7427,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-45717 and No. 333-46617 of PH Group Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
June 14, 2000 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PH Group Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1999.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Columbus, Ohio
July 17, 2000




                                       92
No. 10-10785.

#### Billy Lynn Stevens, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 171,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6048.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE>
  78

                                                                        EXHIBIT 11.1
                           ETHYL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
                         (In thousands except per share amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                                   1996       1995       1994
                                                 -------    -------    -------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income                                       $92,972    $73,963    $97,755

Less preferred stock dividends
   First Preferred:
      6% Series A, $6.00 per share                  -          -           (12)
                                                 -------    -------    -------
   Net income applicable to common stock          92,972     73,963     97,743
                                                 =======    =======    =======
Average number of shares of common stock
outstanding                                      118,444    118,436    118,427

Shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of
   outstanding stock options (1)                       4         10         24
                                                 -------    -------    -------
Shares of common stock and common stock
   equivalents (1) (2)                           118,448    118,446    118,451
                                                 =======    =======    =======

Earnings per share (3)                             $0.78      $0.62      $0.83
                                                 =======    =======    =======
<FN>
Notes:

(1)   For fully-diluted earnings per share, the shares issuable upon the assumed exercise
      of outstanding stock options would be 4, 11, and 26 in 1996, 1995, and 1994,
      respectively, and the shares of common stock equivalents would have been 118,448,
      118,447, and 118,453, respectively.

(2)   To determine the average number of shares of common stock and common stock
      equivalents, the average number of common shares and common stock equivalents
      outstanding (actual or assumed for equivalents) during each month were added
      together and the sum was then divided by 12.

(3)   Primary earnings per share and fully-diluted earnings per share are the same
      amounts.

</TABLE>
# Women's History Month Spotlight: Lt. Col. Sonia Huertas

/ Published March 6, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In honor of Women’s History Month, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution spotlights Army Lt. Col. Sonia Huertas, commander of DLA Distribution Red River, Texas.

Huertas has worked at DDRT as the commander for two years. Before she became the commander, she was part of the Department of Army G-1 as part of the Talent Management Task Force. Before that, she had assignments in Germany, Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan. Huertas credits her previous assignments for giving her the experience and exposure needed to become the commander of DDRT.

“I became the second female and first Hispanic commander of DLA Distribution Red River, a crucial DLA logistical hub, in June 2021,” she said. “The fact that it took 15 years to choose another female leader is not lost on me in the least. In February of this year, I was selected to be promoted to the rank of colonel, one of just 43 women selected compared to 317 males. I am a former enlisted soldier, Hispanic woman, mother, grandmother and wife showing junior female soldiers and women everywhere that it is possible to have it all.”

Huertas believes that it is important to recognize Women’s History Month because it is a time to reflect and recognize the important achievements that woman leaders have made throughout history and to understand that every woman has a history.

“It is time to assess the women who have made important contributions to the growth and molding of our nation,” she said. “We stand on the shoulders of numerous strong women who answered the cry for change and paved the road for it to happen, ensuring that we have a seat at the table. We are responsible for paving the road for the next generation of female leaders in science, society, politics, government and the military.”

“Every woman has a history. I was raised in a traditional home in which woman in my family worked in traditionally female occupations such as teaching, nursing, office work, or homemaking. My mother, a stay-at-home mom, taught me that I could do whatever I wanted. I am the first woman in my family to work in a traditionally male-dominated field. I chose a career path that allows me to mentor women and our male counterparts, encouraging them to allow space for us. I salute any woman who is challenging gender stereotypes, as well as the community and men who support them.”

It is important to Huertas that the DLA workforce recognizes Women’s History Month because it is important to acknowledge the contributions that women have made at DLA.

“DLA offers many opportunities to females, and I am incredibly fortunate to be part of the DLA family,” she said. “It is essential to recognize that each female teammate is also someone’s mother, daughter, and/or sister. Our treatment and care of one another and those around us are part of our success. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect and given the opportunity to reach their full potential. It is time to pay tribute to the women who have come before us and those who continue to pave the path to follow.”