alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 SPKE INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CLASS A COMMON STOCK SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS CUSIP 846511 10 3 THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF SPARK ENERGY, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by
duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS, the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly
authorized officers. Dated: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND CORPORATE SECRETARY COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SPARK ENERGY, INC. DELAWARE SEAL 2014 CORPORATE SPARK ENERGY, INC. 







 



 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–......................Custodian...................... (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act........................................................ (State) The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN as tenants in common as tenants by the entireties as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. – –
– PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE of the Class A common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Shares Attorney THE SIGNATURE TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. NOTICE: SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3045 

To amend section 1065 of title 10, United States Code, as added by the 

John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2019, to extend certain morale, welfare, and recreation privileges to 

Foreign Service officers on mandatory home leave. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 30, 2019 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 1065 of title 10, United States Code, 

as added by the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, to extend certain 

morale, welfare, and recreation privileges to Foreign 

Service officers on mandatory home leave. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3045 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MORALE, WELFARE, 

2 AND RECREATION PRIVILEGES TO FOREIGN 

3 SERVICE OFFICERS ON MANDATORY HOME 

4 LEAVE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1065 of title 10, United 

6 States Code, as added by section 621 of the John S. 

7 McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

8 Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended— 

9 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘veterans 

10 and caregivers for veterans’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘veterans, caregivers for veterans, and 

12 Foreign Service officers’’; 

13 (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as 

14 subsections (g) and (h), respectively; 

15 (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol16 lowing new subsection (f): 

17 ‘‘(f) ELIGIBILITY OF FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICERS

18 ON MANDATORY HOME LEAVE.—A Foreign Service offi19 cer on mandatory home leave shall be permitted to use 

20 military lodging referred to in subsection (h) on the same 

21 basis as a member of the armed forces entitled to retired 

22 or retainer pay.’’; and 

23 (4) in subsection (h), as redesignated by para24 graph (2), by adding at the end the following new 

25 paragraphs: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3045 IH

1 ‘‘(5) The term ‘Foreign Service officer’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 103 of the For3 eign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3903). 

4 ‘‘(6) The term ‘mandatory home leave’ means 

5 leave under section 903 of the Foreign Service Act 

6 of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4083).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2020, as if 

9 originally incorporated in section 621 of Public Law 115– 

10 232. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 2 2 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk August 2 2 , 2018

157 7 7 0 ( 35 )

JOSHUA ZACKS,

Plaintiff,

SC: 1577 70

v COA: 3422 74

Wayne CC: 16

- 000653

- NI

JEFF ZACKS, d/b/a UNLIMITED

INSTALLATIONS SERVICES,

Defendant,

and

1101 WASHINGTON, LLC,

Defendant/Cross

- Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

TOTAL OUTDOOR CORPORATION,

Defendant/Cross

- Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice , the motion of defendant Jeff Zacks to file an answer

to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on August 20

, 2018, is accepted for filing.
No. 10-10775.

#### Spencer Bowens, Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 170,

181 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5969.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 340.
No. 10-10989.

#### Brian Carmichael, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 860, 132 S. Ct. 199,

181 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5835.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 73 App. Div. 3d 622, 901 N.Y.S.2d 48.
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3202

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Joel J. Knott, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 18, 2007 Filed: April 19, 2007

___________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After Joel Knott pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), the district court 1 sentenced him to a year and a day in prison and two years of supervised releas e. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred by declining his request to apply U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2), which provides a reduced base offense level to felon- in-possession defendants who possess firearms solely for collection purposes. Given the stat e of the record and the fact that it was Knott’s burden to prove his entitlement to th e reduced base offense level, we conclude-2- that the district court did not clearly err by determining that Knott (or alternatively, the owner of the shotgun that Knott possesse d) did not possess the firearm solely for collection purposes. See United States v. Lussier , 423 F.3d 838, 843 (8th Cir. 2005) (burden of proof and standard of review ; clear error does not occur when evidence supports two reasonable inferences), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1120 (2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
No. 10-11018.

#### Richard E. Enyart, Petitioner v. Ohio.

565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 203,

181 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5857.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County, denied.
___________

No. 95-4258

___________

Traci Kurilla; Steven Bame; *

Ann Berkes; Dennis Hogate; *

Gladys Burgos; Barb Mertz; *

Kathryn Carter; Paul Motzko; *

Carl Cavallin; Vanessa Mueller; *

Corrine Crider; Eric Osterberg; *

Lynda Marie Gates; Starr Paz; *

Julie Louise Retzer; Charles *

Swanson; Patrick J. Tinjum; *

Russell Sobieck; Michelle M. *

Steady; Nancy Perchel; Gary *

Jenson; Jeff Ohm; Leah *

Schwenke; Robert Brown, Jr.; * Appeal from the United States

Mike Shablo; Brian Swing, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Appellants, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Fred G. Anderson, Inc.; *

*

Defendant. *

*

Diversified Business Credit, *

Inc., *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 25, 1996

 Filed: November 29, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Traci Kurilla and the other appellants are former employees of Fred

G. Anderson, Inc., which ceased operations in February 1995. Appellants

sued Anderson for their unpaid wages and obtained a default judgment.

Anderson has not appealed.
 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for 1

the District of Minnesota.

-2-

In their lawsuit, appellants also sought to recover their unpaid

wages from Diversified Business Credit, Inc., Anderson's former lender.

Appellants alleged (1) conversion, (2) violation of Minnesota's wage lien

statute, and (3) excessive control and equitable subordination. The

District Court granted Diversified's motion to dismiss all of appellants' 1

claims. Appellants appeal only the dismissal of their claim for excessive

control and equitable subordination or equitable estoppel.

Having reviewed the case, we conclude that the District Court's

decision is correct. No error of law appears, and an opinion by this Court

on the questions of state law that the case presents would lack

precedential value. We therefore affirm the decision of District Court on

the basis of that court's well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 11-5622.

#### John Henry Lewis, Petitioner v. Joseph Meko, Warden.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 334,

181 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6380.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the
Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Partnership for the period ended September 30, 2008(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: April 27, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) and Amendment No. 282 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


July 1, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1997
<CASH>                                           2,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                       746
<INVENTORY>                                     74,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,028
<PP&E>                                          69,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,965
<BONDS>                                          1,663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,026
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,592
<SALES>                                        273,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,719
<CGS>                                          199,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  274,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,898)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated June 25, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-195945) of Smart Trust,
Argus Select 30 Equity Total Return Trust, Series 1.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


June 25, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3200 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3200

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2019

 Mr. Massie (for himself, Mr. Amash, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Duncan, 
   Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Comer, and Mr. Babin) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Students Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 1990 AND AMENDMENTS 
              TO THAT ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (q).
    (b) Related Amendments.--
            (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by striking 
        paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesignating paragraphs (28), 
        (29), and (32) through (35) as paragraphs (25) through (30), 
        respectively.
            (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``(k), or 
                (q)'' and inserting ``or (k)''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating 
                paragraphs (5) through (7) as paragraphs (4) through 
                (6), respectively.
            (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (18 U.S.C. 921 
        note, 922 note; section 1702 of Public Law 101-647; 104 Stat. 
        4844-4845) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month (SAAPM)

DLA Land and Maritime

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC)

would like to encourage all DLA employees to get involved in SAAPM 2024. 

 In keeping with the SAAPM theme “STEP FORWARD. Prevent. Report. Advocate,” the 

 following events are scheduled for your awareness and education:

Teal Tuesdays - Every Tuesday we are asking all employees to wear something Teal, whether it is 

a shirt, pants, tie, scarf, hat, ribbon, etc., please show your support every Tuesday in April. Show your 

support every Tuesday in April you may receive a surprise.

April 1 – SAPR Display - Visit the SAPR display to kick off SAAPM in front of the Auditorium in Bldg 20

for information regarding the SAPR Program and local resources.

April 11- SAAPM 5K - Join us in taking a "Step Forward" to promote a safer environment for the DoD 

community at the DSCC MWR Fitness Center, Building 27. Opening remarks begin at 2:30 with the 5K to 

follow. A 1- mile route will be available and Top Participants will receive race medals.

April 17 - Come Paint with us at a guided painting event in support of Child Abuse Prevention 

Month and SAAPM at the Byus Center beginning at 2:30 p.m. Registration is required. Visit 

https://www.defensemwr.com/columbus to register. 

April 24 - National Denim Day - wear your denim to work to show support for sexual assault survivors.

Details on the origin of Denim Day can be found at http:// denimdayinfo.org/.

Week of April 24 -SAAPM Scavenger Hunt – Be on the lookout SAAPM themed items throughout 

the installation. More details to follow via Command Daily Announcements & Message of the Day. 

We look forward to your participation!

Please take pictures of your participation and send them to the SARC listed below.

For more information or questions, contact: 

Ms. Shari Murnahan, SARC

Defense Logistics Agency – Land & Maritime

Comm: (614) 692-8846, DSN-695-8846

Shari.Murnahan@dla.mil
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130526(70) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130526 

 COA: 254284 
 Wayne CC: 03-001038-02

QUENTIN JOHNSTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of July 19, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was granted, 475 Mich 907 (2006). Counsel for the 

defendant, John F. Royal and Cornelius Pitts, have filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, 

citing financial hardship. On order of the Court, the motion to withdraw as counsel is 

GRANTED. MCR 7.316(A)(7). 

We further ORDER the Wayne Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative 

Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint John 

F. Royal to represent the defendant in this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris J. Stern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 23, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Chris J. Stern     
|                    |  |     |  | Chris J. Stern         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 11-6033.

#### Rasheed Hargrove, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 363,

181 L. Ed. 2d 230,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6841.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.