alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00080-CR

JOHNNY SKIPPER MATTHEWS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR13450

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

A jury found Appellant Johnny Skipper Matthews guilty of one count of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child and three counts of indecency with a child 

by contact. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2017), § 21.11

(West Supp. 2017). The jury assessed Matthews’s punishment at twenty years’

confinement on the single count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and at 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

ten years’ confinement on each of the three counts of indecency with a child by 

contact. The trial court sentenced Matthews in accordance with the jury’s 

recommendation and ordered the sentences to run concurrently. Matthews 

timely perfected this appeal. 

Matthews’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and 

motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds for relief. See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). In compliance with 

Kelly v. State, counsel notified Matthews of his motion to withdraw, provided him 

a copy of the brief, informed him of his right to file a pro se response, informed 

him of his pro se right to seek discretionary review should this court hold the 

appeal is frivolous, and took concrete measures to facilitate Matthews’s review of 

the appellate record. See 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 

Although given the opportunity, Matthews did not file a response on his own 

behalf, and the State did not file a brief.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the 

record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is 

frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); 

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only 

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
3

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that arguably might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; WALKER and KERR, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 7, 2017
No. 10-10141.

#### Tommy Lee Ellis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 831, 132 S. Ct. 129,

181 L. Ed. 2d 50,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5350.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 333.
Mi vida...

hoy celebramos tu segundo cumpleaños. 


Damos gracias por tu salud y por la 


protección que tienes contra 


14 enfermedades prevenibles con vacunas. 


Siga el calendario de vacunación infantil 


recomendado, y su bebé quedará 


protegida contra enfermedades graves, 


como el sarampión y la tos ferina, 


antes de los 2 años de edad. 


Las vacunas ayudan a proteger la salud 


de su niño, para que puedan celebrar los 


momentos felices de hoy y del futuro.
 

Con salud, todo es posible. 


Vacune a sus hijos.
 

1-800-232-4636

http://www.cdc.gov/espanol/vacunas 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/events/niiw/promotional/media/downloads/printad-birthday-8x11-sp.pdf

perenne
No. 11-5462.

#### Victor Manuel Tinajero-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 909, 132 S. Ct. 315,

181 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6046.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 1100.
No. 10-11216.

#### Robert Lee Green, Petitioner v. James Rudek.

565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 229,

181 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6945.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 328.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.38-1 APPENDIX 8.38

AP8.38. APPENDIX 8.38

CANCELLATION OF CUSTOMER ASSET REPORT

(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)

FIELD LEGEND

TYPE CANCELLATION

ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

(MANUAL)

BLOCK NO.

(MECHANICAL)

RECORD

POSITION(S)

Send To A Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address 

corresponding to the RIC.

Cancellation is From B Not Applicable Enter the appropriate in-the-clear 

name and address of the 

reporting activity.

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC FTC.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter data as contained in the 

customer asset report (DIC

FTE).

Media and Status 7 Enter data as contained in the 

customer asset report (DIC

FTE).

Stock Number 8-22 Enter data as contained in the 

customer asset report (DIC

FTE).

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter data as contained in the 

customer asset report (DIC

FTE).
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.38-2 APPENDIX 8.38

FIELD LEGEND

TYPE CANCELLATION

ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

(MANUAL)

BLOCK NO.

(MECHANICAL)

RECORD

POSITION(S)

Quantity 25-29 a. Enter quantity being 

canceled.

b. For ammunition and 

ammunition related items only 

(items in Federal supply group 

(FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 

1427, 1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 

8140), enter an M in rp 29 to 

express in thousands any 

quantity exceeding 99,999. 

Example: Express a quantity of 

1,950,000 as 1950M (1950 in rp 

25-28 and an M in rp 29).

Other Fields 20-801 Enter data as contained in the 

customer asset report (DIC

FTE).

Remarks L-V Not Applicable This field shall be used to convey 

any additional required 

information not provided for in 

the cancellation format.

1 Indicate suffix code (rp 44), when applicable, for split actions indicated in DIC FTR.
----

 Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and  results of operations. 

 October 30, 2003 

/s/ Michael Harrop   Michael Harrop, Chief Financial Officer 

----
-79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 37.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●
No. 11-5166.

#### Sridat S.R.S. Chinsammy, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 277,

181 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5598.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 950.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 1999/2000 World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-99 Advisory Committee)

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 
notice advises interested persons that the next meeting of the WRC-99 
Advisory Committee will be held on Tuesday, February 10, 1998, at the 
Federal Communications Commission. The purpose of the meeting is to 
begin preparations for the 1999 World Radiocommunication Conference.

DATES: February 10, 1998; 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 
856, Washington D.C. 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon C. Ladson, FCC International 
Bureau, Planning and Negotiations Division, at (202) 418-0420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
established the WRC-99 Advisory Committee to provide advice, technical 
support and recommendations relating to the preparation of United 
States proposals and positions for the 1999 World Radiocommunication 
Conference (WRC-99). In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, this notice advises interested 
persons of the initial meeting of the WRC-99 Advisory Committee. The 
WRC-99 Advisory Committee has an open membership. All interested 
parties are invited to participate in the Advisory Committee and to 
attend its meetings. The proposed agenda for the first meeting is as 
follows:

Agenda

First Meeting of the WRC-99 Advisory Committee, Federal Communications 
Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 856, Washington, D.C. 20554

February 10, 1998; 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

1. Opening Remarks
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Report on FCC Reorganization of WRC Preparatory Process
4. Suggestions for Improving the Preparatory Process
5. Report on Recent ITU-R meetings
6. Advisory Committee Structure and Meeting Schedule
7. Other Business

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1836 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 11-5445.

#### Daniel Eric Cobble, Petitioner v. Brian Owens, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 312,

181 L. Ed. 2d 192,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5782.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-11030.

#### David Thomas, Jr., Petitioner v. C. Zakhoria, et al.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 205,

181 L. Ed. 2d 110,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6087.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 538.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39283-39284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-660-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

July 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
in Docket No. CP98-660-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 
157.212 and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212, 157.216) for authorization to upgrade 
an existing delivery point located in O'Brien County, Iowa, to provide 
incremental natural gas service to MidAmerican Energy Company (MidAm), 
under Northern's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000 
\1\ pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, 20 FERC para. 62,410 (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Northern states that it requests authority to upgrade the existing 
delivery point at an estimated cost of $47,000 to provide incremental 
natural gas service to MidAm under currently effective throughput 
service agreements. Estimated incremental volumes proposed to be 
delivered to MidAm at this delivery point will be 695 MMBtu on a peak 
day and 62, 781 MMBtu on an annual basis.
    Northern states that the volumes to be delivered to the MidAm after 
the request do not exceed the total volumes authorized prior to the 
request. The proposed activity is not prohibited by Northern's existing 
tariff and Northern has sufficient capacity to accommodate the changes 
proposed herein without detriment or disadvantage to Northern's other 
customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 358.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn

[[Page 39284]]

within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19448 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Robert W.
Cremin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 23, 2008



By:

/s/ Robert W. CreminRobert W. CreminChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11M13.

#### Michael Wigren, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 809, 132 S. Ct. 79,

181 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6755.

October 3, 2011.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 944.
Exhibit 99.2




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Bruce M. Johnson
--------------------------
Bruce M. Johnson
November 11, 2002
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

Consl. Ct. No. 06-141 C 

Filed: December 14, 2015 

**************************************** 

 *

 *

 *

SHELL OIL COMPANY, ATLANTIC *

RICHFIELD COMPANY, TEXACO INC., and *

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, *

 *

 Plaintiffs, *

 *

v. *

 *

THE UNITED STATES, *

 *

 Defendant. *

 *

 *

 *

**************************************** 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the court’s October 30, 2015 Opinion in Shell Oil Co. v. United States, 123 

Fed. Cl. 707, 719 (2015), wherein it determined that the Government waived an insurance offset 

defense, Plaintiffs’ November 17, 2015 Motion In Limine is granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Susan G. Braden 

SUSAN G. BRADEN 

Judge
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1415 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 12 ) IV-E-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/15/20089:38:26

AM Sheet 12 of 130P. 2 | Kennet h Meardo n - Teleco n - Grube rSystems - Lo u Garsi.wp d 

# A-W-5Z N-E-lt [[Contact:26] ] Pag e 1 CONTAC T REPORT Perso n Calling :

Perso n Called : Date o f Contact : Keit

h Barnet t U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y OAQPS/ESD/MIC G 919-541-560 5 Loui s Garas i Grube r System s 800-257-400 5 November

6,200 2 Contac t Summary : Thi s contac t

wa s t o clarif

y th e issu e ofth e exemptio n fo r coverin g mixer s in th e polyme r castin g industry . Th e propose drul e allowe dmixer s u p t o 2 1 gallon s t o b e uncovere dwhe n mixin g colors . W e receive dnumerou s comment s statin g tha t mixer s use dt o mi x color s were actuall y 21. 6 gallons . I calle dMr . Garas i a

t th e suggestio n o f

Stev e McNally . Hi s fir

mi s th e major

supplie r o f mixer s t o th e polymer

castin g industry . M

y cal l concerne dth e size s o f mixe duse dt o mi x colors . Mr . Garas i state dtha

t h e agree dwit

h Stev e tha

t usin g mixe

r surfac e are awoul db e th e bes t way t o set acut-of f fo r th e requirement

fo r covers . Th e larges t

mixer they sel l tha

t i s use dfo r mixin g where color s ar

e mixe din i s a23.5 " ID . They als o sel l 25,26 , and2 7 inc h I D mixers . However thes e hav e cover s andare no t use dwhen color s mus t

b e mixed . There ar e some facilitie s tha

t us e mixer s originall y designe dfo r th e bakin g industry . Thes e ar e Hobar t mixers . H e doe s no t

kno w wha

t siz e thes e mixer s are . Pa

t Tomer a t ICPA i s dealin g wit

h thi s issue .

Confirmation : 1 confir

mthat th e informatio n abov e i s correc t correc t

wit h th e change s note dabove . Signature :
**JULY 2001**

**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP 2.18. APPENDIX 2.18**

**TYPE INSPECTION CODES**

NUMBER OF CHARACTERS:	One

TYPE OF CODE:	Numeric

EXPLANATION: 	Type Inspection Code is used with either MILSTRAP legacy Document Identifier Code (DIC) DLX (Logistics Reassignment Technical and Quality Data and corresponding DLMS 536L; or with DLMS 842C/I (Stock Screening Request) and 842S/Q (Storage Quality Control Report (SQCR))

RECORD POSITION:  	48

## 

## AP 2.18.2.  Type inspection codes used with DLMS 842S/Q SQCR and 842C/I Stock Screening Request:[footnoteRef:1] [1:  Refer to ADC 240 and ADC 1045.  Pending implementation of ADC 1045, targeted for first quarter FY 2017, the following codes will remain available:] 

## 

**AP2.17-**

AP2.18-1

APPENDIX AP2.18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      35,467,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,064,460
<PP&E>                                       2,820,918
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,308,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,472,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,965,903
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       275,978
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,230,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,472,658
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,704,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,690,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,690,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,690,683)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
DLM 4000.25-2, June 13, 2012

AP3.13-1 APPENDIX 3.13

AP3.13. APPENDIX 3.13

BACKORDER

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter appropriate DIC from the DG series 

(third digit codes in this series correspond to 

the third digit codes provided in the D7 

series).

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point to 

which this transaction is being forwarded.

Media and Status 7 Enter M&S code from source document.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item Number 

backordered.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity 

(Backordered)

25-29 Enter quantity backordered, preceding 

significant digits with zeros.1 / 2

Document Number 30-43 Enter document number from original 

document.

Suffix 44 Enter assigned suffix code; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Perpetuate from source document.

Signal 51 Perpetuate from source document.

Fund 52-53 Perpetuate from source document.

Distribution 54-56 Perpetuate from source document.

Project 57-59 Perpetuate from source document.

Priority 60-61 Perpetuate from source document.

Day of Year (Delivery) 62-64 Perpetuate from source document. 

Advice 65-66 Perpetuate from source document.

1 See Appendix AP3 – formats introductions, paragraph AP3.3.1. 

2 See Appendix AP3 – formats introductions, paragraph AP3.3.2.
DLM 4000.25-2, June 13, 2012

AP3.13-2 APPENDIX 3.13

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Routing Identifier 

Code (Storage 

Activity)

67-69 Enter RIC of the storage activity against 

which the backorder is recorded.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Enter ownership/purpose code of item 

backordered.

Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code of the item

backordered.

Management 72 Enter issue management code; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which the transaction is processed.

Multiuse 76-80 For intra-Component use, enter data 

prescribed by the Component. For interComponent use, leave blank.
Order entered November 29, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-16-01369-CV

IN RE HOWARD HOLLAND, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 31610-86



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opini on of this date, we DENY relator’s November 18, 2016

motion to compel the trial court to rule on relator’s motion for production of grand jury

transcript, which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus. .

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE