alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 4, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC, both of London, England; to 
acquire through its subsidiary, Barclays Capital Inc., New York, New 
York, in the acquisition of a substantial portion of the securities 
lending and prime brokerage business of Daiwa Securities America Inc., 
New York, New York, and thereby engage in lending and securities 
activities, pursuant to Secs.  225.28(b)(2)(i) and (b)(7) of Regulation 
Y.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. State Financial Services Corporation, Hales Corners, Wisconsin; 
to acquire Home Bancorp of Elgin, Inc., Elgin, Illinois, a savings and 
loan holding company, and indirectly acquire Home Federal Savings, 
Elgin, Illinois, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 15, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19292 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 11-153.

#### Resat Keles, Petitioner v. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, et al.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 255,

181 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5368,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 74 App. Div. 3d 435, 903 N.Y.S.2d 18.
No. 11-6299.

#### In re Tracy Lindsay, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 439,

181 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7179.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix 5 : Affidavit of Publication for Rules 310, 310.01 and Dust Control Permit

Application Package
Order entered October 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00699-CR

No. 05-19-00824-CR

JOSHUA LEWIS NEAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-57003-X & F18-52038-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 20, 2019 motion for extension of time to file 

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before November 1, 

2019.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
No. 11-5580.

#### Anna Karin Antonsson, Petitioner v. John W. Kast.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 447,

181 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7255.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 1, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1of the Rules of this Court.
No. 11-5882.

#### Theodore Wells, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 354,

181 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7009.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

[To Be Placed on Spark Energy, Inc. Letterhead] 

NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT 

I am very pleased to inform you that pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spark Energy, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan, attached as
Appendix A (the “Plan”), and the associated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, attached as Appendix B (the “Agreement”), you are hereby granted an award to receive the number of Restricted
Stock Units set forth below whereby each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive one share of Stock, plus rights to certain Dividend Equivalents described in Section 3 of the Agreement, subject to certain restrictions thereon, and
under the terms and conditions set forth below, in the Agreement, and in the Plan (the “Restricted Stock Units”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 

 

			
	Grantee:	  	                                      
                  
		
	Date of Grant:	  	                     (“Date of Grant”)
		
	Number of Restricted Stock Units:	  	                                
		
	Vesting Schedule:	  	








 By accepting this Award and the benefits hereunder, you acknowledge and agree that
(a) you are not relying upon any written or oral statement or representation of the Company, its affiliates, or any of their respective employees, directors, officers, attorneys or agents (collectively, the “Company
Parties”) regarding the tax effects associated with your execution of this Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units and your receipt and holding of and the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units, and (b) you are relying on your own
judgment and the judgment of the professionals of your choice with whom you have consulted. You hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the Company Parties from all actions, causes of actions, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, claims,
damages, losses, costs and expenses of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, on account of, arising out of, or in any way related to the tax effects associated with your receipt and holding of and the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units.

 You further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and the Agreement and agree to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan
and the Agreement which are incorporated herein by reference. 
 Congratulations, and thanks for your commitment to our continued success! 

Spark Energy, Inc., 
 a Delaware Corporation 

 

			
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  


  

			
	Attachments:	 	Appendix A – Spark Energy, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan
		 	Appendix B – Restricted Stock Unit Agreement








 Appendix A 

Spark Energy, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan 







 Appendix B 

Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
## APPENDIX I

MATES III

FINAL REPORT

List of Substances and Their Associated Risk Factor s

### MATES III Final Report

Appendix I-2 

## Appendix I

List of Substances and their Associated Risk Factor s

Compound Class CAS Acute REL (μg/m3) Chronic

REL (μg/m3) Unit risk

(μg/m3)-1 Acetaldehyde Carbonyls 75-07-0 9 2.7E-06 Formaldehyde Carbonyls 50-00-0 94 3 6.0E-06 Methyl Ethyl Ketone(MEK) Carbonyls 78-93-3 13000 Arsenic Metal 7440-38-2 0.19 0.03 3.3E-03 Cadmium Metal 7440-43-9 0.02 4.2E-03 Copper Metal 7440-50-8 100 2.4 Cr+6 Metal 18540-29-9 0.2 1.5E-01 Lead Metal 7439-92-1 1.5 1.2E-05 Manganese Metal 7439-96-5 0.2 Nickel Metal 7440-02-0 6 0.05 2.6E-04 Selenium Metal 7782-49-2 20 Zinc Metal 7440-66-6 35 Benz(a)anthracene PAH 56-55-3 1.1E-04 Benzo(a)pyrene PAH 50-32-8 1.1E-03 Benzo(b)fluoranthene PAH 205-99-2 1.1E-04 Benzo(k)fluoranthene PAH 207-08-9 1.1E-04 Chrysene PAH 218-01-9 1.1E-05 Dibenz(ah)anthracene PAH 53-70-3 1.2E-03 Indeno(123-cd)pyrene PAH 193-39-5 1.1E-04 Naphthalene PAH 91-20-3 9 3.4E-05 Benzene VOC 71-43-2 1300 60 2.9E-05 Butadiene, 1,3- VOC 106-99-0 20 1.7E-04 Carbon Tetrachloride VOC 56-23-5 1900 40 4.2E-05 Chloroethene (Vinyl Chloride) VOC 75-01-4 180000 7 .8E-05 Chloroform VOC 67-66-3 5.3E-06 Dibromoethane,1,2- (Ethylene Dibromide) VOC 106-93- 4 7.1E-05 Dichlorobenzene, p- VOC 106-46-7 800 1.1E-05 Dichloroethane, 1,2- (Ethylene Dichloride) VOC 107- 06-2 2.1E-05 Ethylbenzene VOC 100-41-4 2000 2.5E-06 Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) VOC 1634-04-4 8 00 2.6E-07 Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) VOC 75-09-2 14 000 400 1.0E-06 Perchloroethylene VOC 127-18-4 20000 5.9E-06 Styrene VOC 100-42-5 21000 900 Toluene VOC 108-88-3 37000 300 Trichloroethene VOC 79-01-6 600 2.0E-06 Xylene, o- VOC 95-47-6 22000 700

Xylenes, (m+p)- VOC 108-38-3/106- 42-3 22000 700 Diesel Particulate Matter 5 3.0E-4



### Values for the above table are from the Consolidate d Table of OEHHA/ARB Approved Risk Assessment Health Values available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/healthval/healthval.ht m

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and in connection with the quarterly report on
Form  10-QSB of State of  Franklin  Bancshares,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the
quarter  ended  June  30,  2004,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Randal R. Greene,
President of the Company,  hereby  certifies  that (1) the Report fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     This Certification is signed on August 11, 2004.




                                        /s/ Randal R. Greene
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Randal R. Greene, President
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. 

EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN 

PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 

THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), effective as of
                    , 2014 (the “Effective Date”), is between ESA Management, LLC and the individual whose name is set forth
on the signature page hereto (the “Employee”). 
 Section 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Extended Stay America, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Plan”). 
 Section 2. Participant
Acknowledgment. The Employee is an Eligible Individual under the Plan, and hereby acknowledges having received of a copy of the Plan. The Employee further acknowledges having reviewed the Plan and understands that by executing this Agreement he
or she will become a Participant, and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Plan, including the covenants set forth in Sections 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 of the Plan 

Section 3. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by .pdf or facsimile signatures and in any number of counterparts with the same effect as
if all signatory parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

Section 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire agreement between the parties, and supersede all prior
agreements and understandings, oral and written, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
 [signature pages
follow] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, effective as of the date
first set forth above. 
  

			
	ESA MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By: 	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:
		 	
	By: 	 	 
		 	[PARTICIPANT]
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FE3/FE4/GE3/GE4 FORMAT**

**NOTICE OF NONREIMBURSABLE ISSUE**

116

	APPENDIX 3.12

1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dynadapt  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting, CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, CFO

Dated: December 9, 2004
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 

DLA Land and Maritime 

Indirect Value Engineering Savings Submittal Form

Indirect VE Savings - Savings are those developed by DSC or DoD personnel outside of the Value Management (VM) Office who have been exposed to 

the application of VM principles or techniques, therefore, motivated to produce and report cost savings because of this association. 

 Use a separate form for each potential savings. Complete as much of this form as you can. Submit your idea even if you have not provided all the suggested information. 

Additional data and attachments are to be submitted via email to: VEWebTeam@dla.mil or via Inter-Office mail to DLA Land and Maritime-VEB. 

Submitted By:

Action Initiated by Submitter:

Increased Competition/New 

CAGE/PN:

Changed to MIL or FED 

Specification:

Utilized Commercial Data in 

lieu of Military:

Utilized Surplus, Rebuilt, 

Remanufactured Item from CAGE:

Utilized Excess Materials from 

CAGE:

Utilized the following Piece Parts 

in lieu of Assembly:

Office Symbol: Extension:

(Required) Email Address:

NSN (Send drawings, attachments separately):

Item Name:

Purchase Request Number:

Price Negotiation (Must be in 

coordination with VE personnel):

Cancelled Requirements/PR(s):

Sole Source Break/New CAGE/PN:

Determined Prime Manufacturer/

New CAGE/PN:

First Time Competition IAW 

following data:

Other (Please Specify/Provide 

Details):

Use the Submit button to send the form 

 Or, save a copy of the form and send via email to: VEWebTeam@dla.mil
EXHIBIT 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-36968, 33-76090, 33-77600, 33-88706, 333-32795, 333-50689,333-57933, 333-87875, 333-49274, and 333-59234 on Form S-8 ofour report dated February 3, 2003, except for Note 11, as to which date isMarch 17, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Three-FiveSystems, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Three-Five Systems, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         328,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               761,316
<PP&E>                                          35,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,746,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          561,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,588
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,170,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,746,452
<SALES>                                        163,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,759
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (366,027)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,700)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (202,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,268)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-5599.

#### Stacy Lamont Berry, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 915, 132 S. Ct. 332,

181 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5864.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 247.
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


E-learning Institute Fellowship


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








Complete Online Application						Print
																Related Pages
										ELI is paused for 2024. Please check back in Fall 2024 for updates to apply to ELI 2025.The application period is now closed. Please check back for additional updates.
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  August 25, 2023						Source: 	Deputy Director for Public Health Science and Surveillance, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeE-learning Institute Fellowship
Apply to ELIplus icon
Check Eligibility
Review Frequently Asked Questions
Prepare Application Info
Complete Online Application
About ELIplus icon
Meet the Fellowsplus icon
Alumni
Meet the Mentors
Become a Mentor
Graduate Testimonials
Product Examples Develop Training


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
No. 11-195.

#### Jose Gomes, Petitioner v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 959, 132 S. Ct. 419,

181 L. Ed. 2d 287,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7188.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Cali*288fornia, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 192 Cal. App. 4th 1149, 121 Cal. Rptr. 3d 819.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

** **
| **Name of subsidiary**                | ** ** | **Location**           |
|---------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|
| DYNAenergetics Canada Inc             |       | Alberta, Canada        |
| DYNAenergetics GmbH & Co KG  |       | Burbach, Germany       |
| DYNAenergetics Holding GmbH           |       | Burbach, Germany       |
| DYNAenergetics NA, LLC                |       | Colorado, USA          |
| Dynamic Materials Luxembourg 1 S.ar.L |       | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| Dynamic Materials Luxembourg 2 S.ar.L |       | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| Dynaplat  GmbH & Co KG       |       | Burbach, Germany       |
| Nitro Metall Aktiebolag               |       | Likenas, Sweden        |
| Nobelclad Europe S.A.                 |       | Rivesaltes, France     |

 

----
No. 11-5253.

#### Lamarr Fletcher, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 498,

181 L. Ed. 2d 352,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7843.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-11248.

#### Jeremy Allen Crozier, Petitioner v. Adam Endel, et al.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 233,

181 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7055.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.