alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.1

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006

October 25, 2001

David G. Bradley
c/o The Advisory Board Company
600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037

|    |  |                                                                                                                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Non-Competition Agreement by and among The Corporate Executive Board Company, The Advisory Board
Company and David G. Bradley

Dear David:

Effective as of January 1, 1999, The Corporate Executive Board Company (CEB), entered into a Non-Competition Agreement (the Agreement) with you and The Advisory Board Company (ABC). Section 5 of the Agreement provides that the term of the Agreement shall end on the date that is five years after January 1, 1999.

This letter confirms that, in consideration of the benefits which you and CEB each draw from the Agreement, you and CEB have agreed:



| |  |  | To amend Section 5 of the Agreement to provide that the term of the Agreement, solely with respect to the rights and obligations as between you and CEB, shall end on January 1, 2007.                                                           
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | To amend Section 3 of the Agreement to provide that after January 1, 2004, the Bradley Parties, but not ABC, may recruit or employ up to one person per year that would otherwise require the consent of CEB under Section 3(a) of the Agreement.

Nothing in this letter shall be deemed to amend, waive, void or extend the term of the Agreement with respect to ABCs rights or obligations under the Agreement.

Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning one copy of this letter, which will constitute our agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof.

|                                      |  |                                                                              
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Very truly yours,                    
|                                     
|THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
|                                     
|By:
Name:
Title:                      |  | /s/ JAMES J. MCGONIGLEJames J. McGonigle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ DAVID G. BRADLEY

David G. Bradley
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3260 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3260

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2019

    Mr. Brindisi (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. 
 McAdams, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, Ms. Finkenauer, 
Mr. Grothman, and Mr. Golden) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Raise for Congress Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501) is repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such 
Act (2 U.S.C. 4501(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``as adjusted by paragraph (2)'' and 
        inserting ``adjusted as provided by law''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Covista Communications, Inc. on Form
10-K for the period ending January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank J. Pazera, Chief
Financial Officer of Covista Communications, Inc. certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material aspects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          Covista Communications, Inc.


Date: April 29, 2005                   By: /s/ Frank J. Pazera
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Frank J. Pazera
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 141 and 142

[FRL-6121-2]


National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 1 Enhanced 
Surface Water Treatment Rule and Filter Backwash Recycling Rule Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; change in location of previous meeting 
announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA announces a change in location for the meetings on the 
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR) and the 
Filter Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), which were announced in the June 
23, 1998 Federal Register (63 FR 34142).

DATES: The LT1ESWTR public meeting will be held on July 22, 1998. The 
FBRR public meeting will be held on July 23, 1998. Both public meetings 
will begin at 8:30 am local time and will conclude at apprximately 4:30 
pm local time.

ADDRESSES: The LT1ESWTR and FBRR meetings will be held at the Holiday 
Inn, 7390 West Hampden Avenue, Lakewood, Colorado.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on the 
LT1ESWTR public meeting, please contact Steve Potts at (202) 260-5015. 
For the FBRR public meeting, please contact Bill Hamele at (202) 260-
2584.

    Dated: July 8, 1998
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 98-18730 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
No. 10-11123.

#### Daryl Bernard Carter, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 217,

181 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6478.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 288.
```
**FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
                Listing of Active Corporations and other Entities**
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Family Dollar, Inc.
Family Dollar Holdings, Inc.
Family Dollar Services, Inc.
Family Dollar Operations, Inc.
Family Dollar Trucking, Inc.
Family Dollar Marketing, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Colorado, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Connecticut, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Delaware, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of D.C., Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Georgia, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Indiana, L.P.
Family Dollar Stores of Iowa, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, Ltd.
Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Maryland, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Massachusetts, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Mississippi, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of New Jersey, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of New Mexico, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of New York, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of North Carolina, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Oklahoma, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Rhode Island, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of South Carolina, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of South Dakota, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Texas, L.P.
Family Dollar Stores of Vermont, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Virginia, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of West Virginia, Inc.
Family Dollar Stores of Wisconsin, Inc.
```
No. 10-10789.

#### Michael T. Potter, Petitioner v. Ohio.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 172,

181 L. Ed. 2d 84,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6059.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 128 Ohio St. 3d 234, 943 N.E.2d 534.
No. 11-5094.

#### Randall Replogle, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 938, 132 S. Ct. 401,

181 L. Ed. 2d 251,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7392.

October 11, 2011.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 131 S. Ct. 2382, 180 L. Ed. 2d 357 (2011).

Same case below, 628 F.3d 1026.
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


NIIW (National Infant Immunization Week)


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





NIIW Coloring Sheets										Related Pages
										Download and copy these coloring sheets for children. Display them in your waiting room or at your community event.Giraffe, 8-1/2 x 11pdf iconCaterpillar, 8-1/2 x 11pdf icon
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  March 16, 2021					Content source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases homeNIIW Home
Overview
Promotional Materialsplus icon
Logos
Coloring Sheets
Key Messages Vaccines & ImmunizationsWorld Immunization Weekexternal iconVaccination Week in the Americas (VWA)external iconVaccine-related Calendar and Events


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221 DEC 18 2020

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) EMPLOYEES
SUBJECT: Policy Statement on Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Equality of opportunity for our workforce is one of DLA’s unwavering endeavors.
Equality, diversity, and inclusion for everyone are not just principles; they are integral
components to accomplishing DLA’s mission and strategic goals.

Workplace discrimination (including harassment) of any kind directed towards an
individual or group of individuals who are singled out and treated differently because of their
race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national
origin, age (over 40), disability, and genetic information is prohibited. Retaliation against
individuals engaged in protected EEO activity (includes participating in the EEO complaint
process and opposing discriminatory practices or actions) is also prohibited.

DLA is committed to ensuring a workplace free from unlawful discrimination,
harassment, and retaliation, and expect no less than complete support by all supervisors and
employees. Supervisors and employees will adhere to EEO policies and regulations, and refrain
from engaging in acts of discrimination. Employees that observe acts of discrimination must
report such matters to the appropriate officials. Supervisors who observe acts of discrimination to
include acts of harassment, must address such matters immediately, to include disciplining
subordinates found to have discriminated, and providing remedies for individuals harmed.

Any person who believes they have been subjected to workplace discrimination because
of their race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation),
national origin, age (over 40), disability, genetic information and/or prior protected EEO activity
should immediately raise their concerns with their chain of command. When such matters are
raised, supervisors and employees will make a good faith, constructive effort to reach mutually
agreeable solutions. To fully understand all available options, employees are also encouraged to
contact the EEO office no later than 45 calendar days from the date of the alleged discriminatory
act.

As DLA continues to achieve new levels of performance and accountability, and
customer satisfaction in everything we do, it is vital that all employees have a role in eradicating
workplace discrimination, be a beacon of dignity and mutual respect, and embrace equal
opportunity and inclusiveness for everyone.

For more EEO information, please visit the DLA EEO website at www.dla.mil/EEO.
Ue

M. C, SKUBIC
Vice Admiral, SC, USN
Director
No. 11-5211.

#### Paul Ezra Rhoades, Petitioner v. Jeff Henry, Warden.

565 U.S. 946, 132 S. Ct. 401,

181 L. Ed. 2d 263,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7296.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 1027.
No. 11-352.

#### Gayle Oppliger, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 526,

181 L. Ed. 2d 351,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7826.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*352Same case below, 637 F.3d 889.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3312 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for an extension 

of the application period for certain aliens present in the United States 

for adjustment of status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself and Mr. VARGAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for an extension of the application period for certain 

aliens present in the United States for adjustment of 

status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Reunification 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3312 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE APPLICATION PERIOD FOR 

2 CERTAIN ALIENS PRESENT IN THE UNITED 

3 STATES FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 Section 245(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘or before April 30, 2001’’ and inserting the fol7 lowing: ‘‘or after the date that is not later than 5 years 

8 after the date of enactment of the Family Reunification 

9 Act of 2019’’. 

10 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL. 

11 Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

12 (8 U.S.C. 1255) is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(n) An alien who is the beneficiary (including a 

15 spouse or child of the principal alien, if eligible to receive 

16 a visa under section 203(d)) of a petition for classification 

17 under section 204 that was filed with the Secretary of the 

18 Department of Homeland Security and that is prima facie 

19 eligible for approval may not be removed while such peti20 tion or application is being adjudicated or appealed.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   385
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       400,708
<OTHER-SE>                                   (441,411)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       385
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (172,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (172,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (172,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.015)


</TABLE>
**Summary of Changes**

The DLA BSM Implementation Conventions (IC) for the 840, 824 and 864 transactions used the legacy DPACS ICs as a baseline.  For you convenience, the following is a summary of the changes made to the legacy ICs to arrive at the BSM IC. 

**840**

1. Changed qualifier from “KD” to “KY” in detail level of N9 segment.

2. Added notes to the detail level of the MSG segment.

**864**

1. Removed all qualifiers from the BMG segment except “00”.

2. Marked the BMG02 element as not used.

3. Marked the DTM segment as not used.

4. Eliminated all qualifiers except “33” from the header level N103.

5. Marked the N2 segment as not used. 

6. Marked the N3 segment as not used. 

7. Marked the N4 segment as not used.

8. Marked the REF segment as not used. 

9.  Notes added to  MSG segment.

10.  Note added to MIT segment.

11. Notes added to MSG segment.

12.  Marked the N1 segment as not used. 

13. Marked the PER segment as not used. 

14.  Removed note concerning mandatory character length from MSG segment.

**824**

1.  Eliminated all Application Acknowledgment Codes except “TR” from the OTI segment.

2.  Added table containing the 824 application advice codes to the LQ02 segment.
No. 11-5443.

#### Larry Porter, Petitioner v. Glenn Goord, et al.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 312,

181 L. Ed. 2d 192,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5912.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 315.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mark D. Morelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sanjeev Kumar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
No. 11-6268.

#### Ronald L. Tsosie, Petitioner v. Michael Garrett, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 968, 132 S. Ct. 466,

181 L. Ed. 2d 304,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7471.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 262.
No. 11-6074.

#### Malachi Antonio Byrd, Petitioner v. Virginia.

565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 509,

181 L. Ed. 2d 359,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7795.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.