alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00550

- CR Vincent CAUDILLO Jr., Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR6227W Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2018
DIS MISSED Appellant, Vincent Caudillo Jr., entered into a plea bargain with the State, and pled nolo contendere to the charged felony offense. As part of the plea bargain, Caudillo waived his right to appeal. The trial court found Caudillo guilty and imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement . The judgment indicates that permission to appeal was denied. The trial court als o signed a certificate stating this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). Caudillo filed a motion to amend the trial court’s certification of right to appeal and a motion for new trial, and filed a timely notice of appeal. The clerk’s record,04

- 18

- 00550

- CR

- 2

- which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and the wri tten plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P.
2 5.2(a)(2). The record does not contain any matter raised by written motion and ruled on before trial and does not reflect that the trial court granted permission to appeal. The record thus appears to support the trial court’s certification that Caudillo do es not have a right to appeal. On August 21, 2018, t he court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he had the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 25.2(d) (court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record” ). Caudillo filed a response, stating that the trial court heard and denied his motion for new trial and his m otion to amend the certification of the defen d a n t’s right of appeal. Nevertheless, he contends he may appeal “issues of voluntariness.” We disagree . Rule 25.2 “ does not permit the voluntariness of the plea to be raised on appeal.” Cooper v. State , 45 S.W.3 d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) ; see Griffin
v. State , 145 S.W.3d 645, 647

- 48 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)

. After reviewing the record , we agree that Caudillo does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4149

_____________________________

BRADFORD RAMSEY HICKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John T. Brown, Judge.

March 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 10-10267.

#### Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. Joseph Canizaro, et al.

565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 132,

181 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5757,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, March 2007*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.31. APPENDIX 8.31**

**FOREIGN MILITARY SALES NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY DETAIL DOCUMENT**

AP3.31.1.  The mechanized foreign military sales (FMS) notice of availability (NOA) detail document will be prepared from the issue release/receipt documents (materiel release order (MRO), DD Form 1348-1A, and DD Form 1348-2) contained in the shipment unit and shall accompany the FMS NOA key document.

AP3.31-2

2

APPENDIX 3.31.

AP8.31-1

APPENDIX 8.31
No. 09-7131.

#### Matthew Allan Acosta, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1078, 131 S. Ct. 632,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9228.

178 L. Ed. 2d 508,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 159.
No. 11-6009.

#### Fred Erby, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 361,

181 L. Ed. 2d 229,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7027.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit No. 31.2**

 

Form 10-K 

Synthetic Blood International, Inc.

 

**Certification**

 

I, David Johnson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005 ofSynthetic Blood International, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3007021-MAR-201310:07 AM
No. 11-5301.

#### Roger L. Hueber, Jr., Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 294,

181 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5536.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 81 App. Div. 3d 1466, 916 N.Y.S.2d 727.
VEHICLE REGISTRATION LOG

TIME

PURPOSE IN

POST NUM

OUT

REGISTRATION

NUMBER PRINTED NAME (Last, First, MI) VEHICLE MAKE DESTINATION 

DLA FORM 1749, MAY 96 (EG) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. 

GATE NUM
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A153
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39084-39085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-103-001]


OkTex Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, OkTex Pipeline Company (OkTex), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of August 1, 
1998:

Original sheet No. 26A
Original Sheet No. 30A

    OkTex states that the additional tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's directives in Order No. 587-G.
    OkTex states that the tariff sheets reflect the changes to OkTex's 
tariff that result from the Gas Industry Standards Board's (GISB) 
consensus standards that were adopted by the Commission in its April 
16, 1998 Order No. 587-G in Docket No. RM96-1-007. OkTex further states 
that Order No. 587-G contemplates that OkTex will implement the GISB 
consensus standards for August 1998 business, and that the tariff 
sheets therefore reflect an effective date of August 1, 1998.
    OkTex states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and

[[Page 39085]]

Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19339 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
WILLIE FRED BAUCHAM,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3503

Opinion filed December 18, 2014.

Amended Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie Fred Baucham, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Acreage

(1,000)

Visitors

(1,000) 1

Total ($1,000)expenditures

United States. . . 13,922 747,964 935,005 40.1

Alabama . . . . . . . . 48 5,142 22,567 57.0

Alaska ......... 3,361 4,977 2,791 35.2

Arizona . . . . . . . . . 64 2,348 9,639 38.9 Arkansas. . . . . . . . 54 8,399 22,332 48.3

California........ 1,566 79,854 90,672 21.3

Colorado . . . . . . . . 420 11,834 25,811 66.9

Connecticut . . . . . . 206 7,504 5,104 29.9 Delaware. . . . . . . . 26 5,022 12,397 53.6

Florida . . . . . . . . . 700 20,737 42,779 54.8

Georgia . . . . . . . . 86 10,351 35,272 56.2 Hawaii . . . . . . . . . 34 10,182 2,206 20.5

Idaho . . . . . . . . . . 46 4,031 3,608 20.9

Illinois. . . . . . . . . . 486 45,159 6,804 11.9 Indiana . . . . . . . . . 179 18,043 41,379 78.1

Iowa. . . . . . . . . . . 69 13,382 3,864 25.1 Kansas . . . . . . . . . 33 6,875 5,998 57.1

Kentucky. . . . . . . . 49 7,082 54,983 61.1 Louisiana . . . . . . . 43 1,679 7,669 24.6 Maine . . . . . . . . . . 100 2,124 3,027 34.4

Maryland. . . . . . . . 133 11,330 16,694 49.4 Massachusetts . . . . 341 31,635 11,299 14.6

Michigan . . . . . . . . 273 19,309 38,639 86.7 Minnesota . . . . . . . 279 8,380 15,694 44.9

Mississippi. . . . . . . 24 1,212 8,926 63.0

Missouri . . . . 

Montana . . . . 

Nebraska . . . 

Nevada. . . . . 

New Hampshir

New Jersey . . 

New Mexico. . 

New York . . . 

North Carolina 

North Dakota . 

Ohio. . . . . . . 

Oklahoma . . . 

Oregon . . . . . 

Pennsylvania . 

Rhode Island .

South Carolina 

South Dakota. 

Tennessee. . . 

Texas . . . . . . 

Utah. . . . . . . 

Vermont . . . . 

Virginia . . . . . 

Washington . . 

West Virginia . 

Wisconsin . . . 

Wyoming. . . . 

1 Includes overnight visitors.

Source: The National Association of State Park Directors, Raleigh, NC, 200

February 2009). See <http://www.naspd.org/>.

A

U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2010
(see attached scope of accreditationfor field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)Print Date: 09/17/2009Page 1 of 2This is to signify thatFORESTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.578 SOUND AVENUE, PO BOX 922WADING RIVER, NEW YORK 11792Product Certification Agency PCA-113Third-party Certification Bodyhas met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Product CertificationAgencies (AC370) and hasdemonstrated compliance with ISO/IEC Guide 65 (1996),General requirements for bodies operating product certificationsystems.Forestwood Industries Inc. has been accredited, commencing September 1, 2009 to provide third-party productcertification services listed inthe approved scope of accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President PresidentForestwood Industries, Inc. PCA-113Third-party Certification BodySeptember 1, 2009Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentPrint Date: 09/17/2009Page 2 of 2Forestwood Industries, Inc. Gary Poserina578 Sound Avenue, PO Box 922 Quality Control ManagerWading River, NY 11792 (631) 929-3197CATEGORIES of CERTIFICATIONFormaldehyde Emissions from Wood ProductsCertification under California Air ResourcesBoard (ARB) ANSI and ANSI/HPVA Standards
No. 10-6587.

#### Gary Ray Bowles, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 652,

178 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9294.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 1313.
No. 10-10548.

#### Lawrence J. Blair, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 840, 132 S. Ct. 150,

181 L. Ed. 2d 67,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6173.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 55 So. 3d 1286.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00392-CR

Manuel Hernandez Robles, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-07-207468, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Manuel Hernandez Robles seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for

kidnapping. The trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case, that Robles waived

his right to appeal, and that Robles has no right of appeal. The appeal is dismissed. See

Tex R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 17, 2008

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing with the Commission

July 9, 1998.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major License.
    b. Project No.: 2192-008.
    c. Date Filed: June 26, 1998.
    d. Applicant: Consolidated Water Power Company.
    e. Name of Project: Biron Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Wisconsin River in the Village of Biron, Wood 
and Portage Counties, Wisconsin.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Secs. 791(a)-
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Kenneth K. Knapp, Consolidated Water Power 
Company, P.O. Box 8050, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495, (715) 422-3073.
    i. FERC Contact: Chris Metcalf (202) 219-2810.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the filing date shown in paragraph 
(c).
    k. Description of Project: The existing, operating project consists 
of: (1) a 2,533-foot-long, 34-foot-high concrete gravity dam with 
intake section, three spillway sections, and 22 Tainter gates; (2) a 
concrete seawall and earth embankments along the banks of the 
reservoir; (3) a 2,078-acre reservoir at water surface elevation 1035.3 
feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum; (4) a powerhouse, integral with 
the dam, containing two 1,450-kW generators and an industrial building 
with one 400-kW generator; (5) generator leads; and appurtenant 
electrical facilities necessary to interconnect with transmission 
system.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the 
WISCONSIN STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by 
Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes 
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to 
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the 
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person 
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60 
days from the filing date and serve a copy of the request on the 
applicant.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18793 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-475.

#### Mahender Murlidhar Sabhnani, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1194, 131 S. Ct. 1000,

178 L. Ed. 2d 854,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 619.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *855Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 215.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18714]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1223-DR]

Florida; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida, (FEMA-1223-DR), dated June 18, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 29, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Florida, is hereby amended to include movement and use of Federal 
resources and reimbursement for the eligible costs associated with that 
use for all 67 counties in the State of Florida.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-18714 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```
Exhibit 32.4


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers, L.P. , hereby certify, based on my knowledge , that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.


Date: November 8, 2011





/s/ Bruce M. JohnsonBruce M. JohnsonChief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
MEASLES

More than just a little rash

MEASLES CAN BE 

DANGEROUS

Especially for babies and 

young children 

PROTECT YOUR CHILD

Measles can lead to...

PNEUMONIA 

(A SERIOUS LUNG INFECTION)

BRAIN DAMAGE

DEAFNESS

DEATH

SYMPTOMS OF MEASLES

MEASLES IS HIGHLY 

CONTAGIOUS

Here’s how it’s spread...

MEASLES AROUND 

THE WORLD

Measles circulates in many parts of the world 

and cases can be brought into the U.S. at any time.

IMMUNIZATION. 

POWER TO PROTECT.

Learn more at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents

JUNE 2019

LINGERING 

GERMS 

(CAN LINGER IN A 

ROOM LONG AFTER 

A SICK PERSON HAS 

LEFT IT!)

COUGHING &

SNEEZING

RED EYES

COUGHING

RASH OF TINY

RED SPOTS

(STARTS ON HEAD)

RUNNY 

NOSE

DIARRHEA

EAR INFECTION

ABOUT 1 OUT OF 5

people who get measles 

will be hospitalized.

DOSE #1

12–15 months

DOSE #2

4–6 years

Infants 6–11 months old should have 1 dose of MMR shot

before traveling abroad.

The MMR vaccine protects against measles, mumps and 

rubella. Doctors recommend that your child get 2 doses 

of MMR for best protection. Your child will need one dose

at each of the following ages...
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

p1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145326

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145326

COA: 306426

Wayne CC: 74

- 005901

- FC

ERNEST BROWNING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.