alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P.(the Partnership), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 9, 2009



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
|Martin E. Stein, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nuclear Regulatory Commission


Assessment of the Use of Potassium Iodide (KI) as a Public 
Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents; Availability of 
NUREG

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Request for comments and notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NRC is announcing the availability of draft NUREG-1633, 
``Assessment of the Use of Potassium Iodide (KI) As a Public Protective 
Action During Severe Reactor Accidents,'' and is requesting comments by 
September 15, 1998. Copies may be obtained by writing to the 
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, PO Box 
37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328. You may obtain a copy free of charge 
to the extent of supply by writing to: Reproduction and Distribution 
Section, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop OP-137, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aby S. Mohseni, Division of Incident 
Response, Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Telephone: 
301-415-6409, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6e7c624f617d6c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa9b8997ba948899d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 26, 1998, the Commission directed 
the staff to issue the draft NUREG-1633 for public comment. The staff 
will publish NUREG-1633 in its final form after evaluating comments 
received and making the appropriate changes. Subsequently, the staff 
will develop an information brochure based on NUREG-1633 to assist 
State and local planners in reaching an informed decision as to whether 
KI is an appropriate protective supplement.

Electronic Availability

    Draft NUREG-1633 is also available electronically in the Reference 
Library area of the NRC's Home Page under technical reports. (<a href="http://
www.nrc.gov">http://
www.nrc.gov</a>).

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank J Congel,
Director, Division of Incident Response, Office for Analysis and 
Evaluation of Operational Data.
[FR Doc. 98-19222 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
December 15, 2022

Dear Tribal Leader:

On behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances 

and Disease Registry (ATSDR), I invite you to join this upcoming meeting that will convene leaders from 

tribal nations, CDC, and ATSDR:

25

th Biannual CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting 

February 8, 2023, 9:00–5:00 pm (ET)

February 9, 2023, 9:00–3:00 pm (ET)

The meeting will be hosted by CDC in Atlanta, Georgia, with the option to attend either in-person or 

virtually. Seating at the in-person event is limited, so be sure to register early if you plan to attend inperson. Please use the registration link to indicate if you’ll attend in-person or virtual. Everyone who 

registers will receive a unique link to access the virtual meeting. This will allow people who want to 

attend in-person to participate from a remote location if their schedule doesn’t allow them to be on site 

the whole time. 

The meeting will provide opportunities for tribal leaders to hear about and provide input on the public 

health issues affecting their tribal nations. These topics will include, but are not limited to, tribal priorities 

for CDC and ATSDR and CDC programmatic highlights. We look forward to productive discussions at the 

meeting. The agenda will be available on the CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee webpage in January 

2023.

We hope you will join us. Your input is very important to us as we work to improve tribal access to CDC

and ATSDR programs and services and to strengthen partnerships with tribes and American Indian and 

Alaska Native (AI/AN) community organizations. CDC and ATSDR remain committed to respecting tribal 

sovereignty while working together to leverage capacity, expertise, and resources to achieve the greatest 

impact on the health issues affecting AI/AN communities.

For more information about the meeting, please contact the Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances 

at TribalSupport@cdc.gov or 404-498-0300.

Sincerely,

Celeste Philip, MD, MPH (she/her)

Acting Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support 

Deputy Director for Non-Infectious Diseases

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
JOHN O. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1454

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

John O. Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack D. Massimino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                      
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ JACK D. MASSIMINO                
|             |  | Jack D. Massimino                    
|             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 June 2, 2008
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         116,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,135,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    764,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,155,799
<PP&E>                                       1,752,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                 927,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,378,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,819,482
<BONDS>                                        416,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,878
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,114,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,378,346
<SALES>                                      9,101,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,101,850
<CGS>                                        6,901,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,901,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                410,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            367,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   367,712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39561-39562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-662-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

July 17, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-662-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.216) for authorization to abandon a sales tap in Jefferson Davis 
Parish, Louisiana under Tennessee's blanket certificate issued in 
Docket No. CP82-413-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    The tap had been used for a direct sale of natural gas for 
agricultural purposes since an in-service date of

[[Page 39562]]

March 17, 1967. Tennessee states that the meter has been inactive for 
some time and that no customer is being serviced by the farm tap.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19591 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Chapter 11 Sustainable Practices

CHAPTER 11 

Sustainable Practices

Sustainable Practices is a vital part of supporting DLA’s mission. The U.S. Depart

of Defense (DoD) is in the process of providing new guidance going forward to meet 

sustainability objectives and goals set by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ

per Executive Order (EO) 13834 “Efficient Federal Operations

Executive Order 13834: Efficient Federal Operations

EO 13834: Efficient Federal Operations was signed May 17, 2018. This EO references requirements established by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independen

and Security Act (EISA) of 2007.

It is the policy of the United States that agencies meet such statutory requirement

in a manner that increases efficiency, optimizes performance, eliminates unnecessary 

use of resources, and protects the environment. In implementing this policy, each

agency shall prioritize actions that reduce waste, cut costs, enhance the resilience of 

federal infrastructure and operations, and enable more effective accomplishment of 

its mission. This EO rescinds EO 13693. 

EO 13834 includes the following requirements for federal agencies

 Reduce building energy use annually and implement cost-saving energy

efficiency measures.

 Meet statutory requirements for renewable energy and electricity consumption.

 Reduce potable and non-potable water consumption and comply with

stormwater management requirements.

 Use performance contracting to achieve energy, water, building modernization,

and infrastructure goals.

 Ensure new construction and major renovations conform to building efficiency

requirements and sustainable design principles; consider building efficiency when 

renewing or entering into leases; implement space utilization and optimization 

practices; and annually report on building conformance to sustainability metrics.

 Implement waste prevention and recycling and comply with federal requirements

on the management and disposal of solid, hazardous, and toxic waste.

 Adhere to Federal Acquisition Regulation requirements and procurement policies

regarding the purchase, use, and disposal of products, including electronics.

 Track and report on energy management activities, performance improvements,

cost reductions, greenhouse gas emissions, energy and water savings, and other 

performance measures.

The CEQ will develop guidance for federal agencies on how to meet thes

requirements. 
THIS PAGE LEFT 

INTENTIONALLY BLANK
No. 11-6273.

#### Gary Baptiste, aka Gary Baptise, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 957, 132 S. Ct. 438,

181 L. Ed. 2d 284,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7210.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-11005.

#### Cornelius Brown, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 201,

181 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6306.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 395 Ill. App. 3d 1112, 369 Ill. Dec. 491, 986 N.E.2d 804.
No. 11-5196.

#### Michael Anthony Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 280,

181 L. Ed. 2d 167,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5469.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|November 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ KENNETH S. ORD                                  
|                 |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                 |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
F. Adair, as Chief Financial Officer of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 6, 2008



By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
The physical address of the personal computer or server, is the actual specific physical point where this equipment is 

located.

Example: 

In order to obtain your personal computer or server MAC address:

Open a Run window (Windows Logo key + R)

Type cmd /k ipconfig /all (note the three spaces) and press enter

The ‘physical address’ listed is the ‘MAC address’, which is made up 

of 6 groups of 2 hexadecimal characters (e.g. 00-21-70-BE-C6-71).
No. 11-5396.

#### Timothy J. Meadows, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 386,

181 L. Ed. 2d 243,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6390.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-6452.

#### Tommy Ray Elam, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 470,

181 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7495.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 593.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136661 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r & (12) Marilyn Kell y (17) Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136661 COA: 284457 Saginaw CC: 06-027898-FC JESSE RUCARDO WADE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 30, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED. The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED.

l1020 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 31.3

Certifications

Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

I, Duncan Hon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

Date: July 27, 2018



/s/ Duncan HonDuncan HonChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and
will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. BRIAN EDWARD BOYER, : : : : : : : : : : No. 539 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 5th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
No. 10-10865.

#### Theodore Woodmansee, Petitioner v. Troy Steele, Warden.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 182,

181 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6130.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.