alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,459
<SECURITIES>                                    14,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                       635
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,180
<PP&E>                                           8,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,133
<SALES>                                          3,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,303
<CGS>                                            4,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.63)


</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06363

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06363\06363_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06363\06363_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06363\06363_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06363\06363_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06363\06363_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06363\06363_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06363\06363_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06363\06363_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06363\Certification Statement_06363.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Aerial view.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Follow Up attachment.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

x 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Follow up Responses.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

x x 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_M73-LG01-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18937]



[[Page 38408]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel; Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Cooperative Agreement for Prevention 
Research Centers, Program Announcement #98028 meeting.
    Times and Dates: 8:30-8:50 a.m., August 4, 1998 (Open). 9 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., August 4, 1998 (Closed). 9 a.m.-4:40 p.m., August 5, 1998 
(Closed).
    Place: National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, 
Corporate Square Office Park, Building 12, Room 1307 (Library), 
Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Associate Director for 
Management and Operations, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement #98028.
    Contact Person for More Information: John R. Lehnnherr, Chief, 
Prevention Support Office, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB 
Prevention, CDC, Corporate Square Office Park, 11 Corporate Square 
Boulevard, m/s E07, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, telephone 404/639-8025.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Nancy C. Hirsch,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention CDC.
[FR Doc. 98-18937 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Saitta 

674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is petitioner's burden to 

demonstrate that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. 

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 

(2004). 

Having considered petitioner's arguments, we are not 

persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Id. In particular, because 

some of the factors set forth in Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc., 126 Nev. „ 245 P.3d 1198, 1201 (2010), and Scrimer v. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, 116 Nev. 507, 516, 998 P.2d 1190, 1195-96 (2000), 

support the district court's decision to grant the untimely motion to 

enlarge and to deny the motion to dismiss, the district court neither 

exceeded its jurisdiction nor arbitrarily or capriciously exercise its 

discretion. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; Int'l Game Tech., 124 

Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558; see Saavedra-Sandoval, 126 Nev. at 245 

P.3d at 1200 (explaining that the good-cause determinations under NRCP 

4(i) are within the district court's discretion). 2Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Gibbons 

2Moreover, even if Rodriguez-Cortez lacked good cause for filing the 

untimely enlargement motion and for failing to timely serve process, 

dismissal of his third-party complaint would have been without prejudice. 

See NRCP 4(i). And given the applicable time limitations for the claims 

asserted in his complaint, see Pack v. LaTourette, 128 Nev. „ 277 

P.3d 1246, 1249 (2012); Saylor v. Arcotta, 126 Nev. „ 225 P.3d 

1276, 1278 (2010), Rodriguez-Cortez could have timely refiled his 

complaint. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A (4((fDp 
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge 

Barron & Pruitt, LLP 

Kevin A. Sprenz 

H3Law - Hansen Hale & Hansen 

Law Offices of R.S. & Associates 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) I947A deo
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ERIK REDEEMER
, Appellant,

v.

GREGG ROSSMAN
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 1119

[ July 8, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John Thomas Luzzo , Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 9031 09

.

Erik Redeemer, Pollock, Louisiana, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David J. Glantzi, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

G ROSS

, J.

We affirm the order dismissing a c ivil tort complaint against a prosecutor upon prosecutorial immunity grounds.

Almost every court that has considered the prosecutorial conduct at issue in this case “has determined that prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity from suits . . . claiming that the plaintiff’s constitutional rights

were violated as a result of the initiation of an extradition process.” Uribe

v. Cohen , 3:04 CV 1723 CFD, 2006 WL 2349567, at *3 (D. Conn. Aug. 3,

2006 ) (footnote omitted) ; see , e.g. , Larsen v. Early , 842 F. Supp. 1310, 1313 (D. Colo. 1994) (prosecutor entitled to absolute immunity since “extradition is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process” (internal quotation omitted) ); Cleary v. Andersen , 423 F. Supp. 745, 748 (D. Neb. 1976) (“[I]t is apparent that the proper discharge of the
prosecutor ’ s duties in the c riminal justice system requires that he be accorded unhampered discretion in deciding when to seek the extradition of an individual.”); Rivera v. Algarin , 350 Fed. Appx. 703, 708 (3d Cir. 2009) (“Ricca’s efforts to initiate extradition proceedings against Rivera are prosecutorial in nature and entitle her to immunity from liability.”); Cross

v. Meisel , 720 F. Supp. 486, 489 (E.D. Pa. 1989) ; Arebaugh v. Dalton , 600- 2

-

F. Supp. 1345, 1351 (E.D. Va. 1985) ; Brooks v. Fitch , 534 F. Su pp. 129, 132 (D.N.J 1981) (“[T]he decision s to extradite and to issue an arrest warrant fall within the scope of absolute immunity.”). The justification is obvious considering the purpose of extradition. As the federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals exp lained in Dababnah v. Ke ller

- Burnside , 208 F.3d 467, 472 (4th Cir. 2000)

, “[i]nsuring that a defendant is present both for trial and for punishment is critical to a prosecutor’s discharge of her

duties . . . . Indeed, if a convicted defendant is not available for punishment, the prosecution itself would be rendered pointless.”

Affirmed

.

C IKLIN
, C.J. , and S TEVENSON

, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-5635.

#### Alton E. Urbauer, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 407,

181 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7271.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
No. 11-5700.

#### Jotan Cooper, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 949, 132 S. Ct. 410,

181 L. Ed. 2d 268,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7362.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 78 Mass. App. 1118, 939 N.E.2d 136.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3275 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand River, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Andy ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3275 EH

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ANDY ‘‘ACE’’ NOWACKI POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand 

5 River, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance 

6 Corporal Andy ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Andy 

11 ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3275 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Post-

‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. Grand River, Ohio, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Andy al Service located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.'1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.'1350, I, the undersigned Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general partner ofRegency Centers,
L.P. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 5, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce M. Johnson   
|Bruce M. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-21.

#### Tammi P. Bowden, et al., Petitioners v. Kirkland & Ellis, LLP.

565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 243,

181 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5361.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 596.
Updated 4/27/2022

**PUB LOG Extract Source**

**CAGE.zip**

**P_CAGE.CSV  (3 million + rows)**

Field NameColumnLengthDRN                                                          "CAGE_CODE",15CAGE_CD_9250"CAGE_STATUS",21CAGE_STAT_CD_2694"TYPE",31CAGE_TYP_CD_4238"CAO",46CAO_CD_8870“COMPANY”,5178VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“CITY”,636VCITY_1084“STATE_PROVINCE”,736VST_US_POSN_AB_0186 or OTH_STA_PRVNC_8978“ZIP_POSTAL_ZONE”,810VZIP_CD_4400 + ZIP_ADD_ON_4398“COUNTRY”936VCNTRY_1085

**V_CAGE_ADDRESS.CSV  (3 million + rows)**

Field NameColumnLengthDRN                                                          "CAGE_CODE",15CAGE_CD_9250"COMPANY_NAME",236VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086"COMPANY_NAME_2",336VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086"COMPANY_NAME_3",436VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“COMPANY_NAME_4”,536VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“COMPANY_NAME_5”,636VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“STREET_ADDRESS_1”,736VST_ADRS_1_1082“STREET_ADDRESS_2”,836VST_ADRS_2_1083“PO_BOX”,936VPOBOX_1361“CITY”,1036VCITY_1084“STATE”,112ST_US_POSN_AB_0186“ZIP”,1210VZIP_CD_4400 + ZIP_ADD_ON_4398“COUNTRY”,1336VCNTRY_1085“DATE_EST”,1411DT_OE_RCD_EST_2262“LAST_UPDATE”,1511FROM_DATE“FORMER_NAME_1”,1636VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“FORMER_NAME_2”,1736VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“FORMER_NAME_3”,1836VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“FORMER_NAME_4”,1936VADRS_NM_C_TXT_1086“FRN_DOM”201FRN_DOM_CD_4235

**V_CAGE_STATUS_AND_TYPE.CSV  (3 million + rows)**

Field NameColumnLengthDRN                                                          "CAGE_CODE",15CAGE_CD_9250"STATUS",21CAGE_STAT_CD_2694"TYPE",31CAGE_TYP_CD_4238"CAO",46CAO_CD_8870“ADP”,56ADP_PNT_CD_8835“PHONE”,620VTEL_NBR_1359“FAX”,720VTEL_NBR_1359“RPLM_CODE”,85RPLM_CAGE_CD_3595“PARENT_CAGE”,95PARNT_TAXPYR_3403

“ASSOC_CODE”,105ASSOC_CD_CAGE_8855“AFFIL_CODE”,111TYP_CAGE_AFFL_0250“BUS_SIZE”,121SZ_OF_BUS_CD_1364“PRIMARY_BUSINESS”,131PR_BUS_CAT_CD_1365“TYPE_OF_BUSINESS”,141TYP_BUS_CD_1366“WOMAN_OWNED”,151WMN_OWND_BUS_1367“CNGRSL_DSTRCT”,163CNGRSL_DSTRCT_3410“DESIGNATOR”171CAGE_NSCM_DES_2620
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among MORGAN STANLEYCAPITAL I INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneral Master Servicer,  CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General SpecialServicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCBSpecial Servicer,  WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee  andPARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates  Series 2017-BNK5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalizedterms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, DanielBober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do herebycertify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom June 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),  andof its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and  

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period. 

  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2018. 

                                                                                           

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober 

Executive VicePresident                                      

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-5976.

#### Willie Dantzler, Petitioner v. Lisa J. W. Hollingsworth, Warden.

565 U.S. 926, 132 S. Ct. 359,

181 L. Ed. 2d 227,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7039.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF STATE OF FRANKLIN BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,127,041
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         253,403
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,364,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,345,240
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,988,280
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,489,616
<LOANS>                                    106,576,081
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (818,380)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,282,865
<DEPOSITS>                                 130,034,843
<SHORT-TERM>                                    48,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          9,818,163
<LONG-TERM>                                    591,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,190,427
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,599,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             152,282,865
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,834,611
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,627,143
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,461,764
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,074,962
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,442,827
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,018,927
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  189,506
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              12,724
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,229,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,005,998
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,005,998
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   647,205
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               630,324
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,450
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              818,380
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           818,380
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
2020 WI 22

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

CASE NO.: 2018AP168

COMPLETE TITLE: In the matter of the temporary guardianship and 

protective placement of J.J.H.:

Waukesha County,

 Petitioner-Respondent,

 v.

J.J.H.,

 Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION FILED: February 27, 2020 

SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 

ORAL ARGUMENT: February 10, 2020 

SOURCE OF APPEAL:

COURT: Circuit 

COUNTY: Waukesha 

JUDGE: Lloyd Carter 

JUSTICES:

DALLET, J. dissents.

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ANN WALSH BRADLEY and HAGEDORN, JJ. 

ATTORNEYS:

For the respondent-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs 

filed by Colleen D. Ball, assistant state public defender. There 

was an oral argument by Colleen D. Ball.

For the petitioner-respondent, there was a brief filed by 

Robert J. Mueller, Wauskeha. There was an oral argument by Robert 

J. Mueller.

An amicus curiae briefs was filed on behalf of Association 

for the Rights of Citizens with Handicaps, Disability Rights 
2

Wisconsin, National Disability Rights Network, and National 

Association of the Deaf by Susan R. Tyndall and Habush, Habush & 

Rottier, S.C.
2020 WI 22

NOTICE

This opinion is subject to further 

editing and modification. The final 

version will appear in the bound 

volume of the official reports. 

No. 2018AP168

(L.C. No. 2017ME589)

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the matter of the temporary guardianship and 

protective placement of J.J.H.:

Waukesha County,

 Petitioner-Respondent,

 v.

J.J.H.,

 Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

FILED

FEB 27, 2020

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Supreme Court

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed as 

improvidently granted.

¶1 PER CURIAM. J.J.H. petitioned for review of the 

decision of the court of appeals, Waukesha Cty. v. J.J.H., No. 

2018AP168, unpublished order (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2019), 

dismissing her appeal as moot. After reviewing the record and the 

briefs of both parties, and after hearing oral arguments, we 

conclude this matter should be dismissed as improvidently granted.
No. 2018AP168 

2

¶2 By the Court.—The review of the decision of the court of 

appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶3 ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J., withdrew from participation.

¶4 BRIAN HAGEDORN, J., did not participate.

¶5 REBECCA FRANK DALLET, J., dissents.
No. 2018AP168 

1
Protect Your Family from 

Tuberculosis! 

You’ve been sick for 

more than 3 weeks...
 

Tuberculosis is 

contagious. 

If you have these 

symptoms, visit 

the doctor today! 

Cough with phlegm 

for more than 

3 weeks 

Fever Weight loss Night 

sweats 

Cough with 

blood

Tuberculosis Health Center 

can be cured. 

If you need treatment, it can 

be low cost or free. All your 

information is private. 

For more information go to www.cdc.gov/tb/ 

or call:
No. 10-11269.

#### Kenneth Hickman-Bey, Petitioner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 237,

181 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6589.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, denied.
No. 11-5287.

#### John E. Hargrove, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 899, 132 S. Ct. 292,

181 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5725.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 625 F.3d 170.