Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 Official icon**Official websites use .gov**
				A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Lock icon**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
				A lock (  ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
	CDC LogoCDC Logo
 Search

		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site

				All CDC
				Submit


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)





ACIP Evidence to Recommendations for Primary Polio Vaccination Among Adults Aged ≥18 Years						Print
																Related Pages
										**Question:**Should completion of a primary polio vaccination series with inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) be recommended for unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated adults in the United States?
**Population:**Unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated adults aged ≥18 years in the United States
**Intervention:**Completion of a primary vaccination series with IPV
**Comparison:**No vaccination or partial series completion
**Outcomes:**Prevention of paralytic poliomyelitis; serologic immunity to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3; serious adverse events following vaccination; indirect effects, e.g., community transmission, impact on health systems**Background:**
In July 2022, a case of paralytic polio caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (VDPV2) was confirmed in an unvaccinated young adult in Rockland County, New York (1). Retrospective and prospective wastewater testing in Rockland and several surrounding counties demonstrated the presence of poliovirus type 2 genetically linked to the case in New York as early as April 2022 and as recently as February 2023 (1–3). Genetic sequencing indicated a linkage between the VDPV2 in New York to polioviruses detected in wastewater in Israel, the United Kingdom, and Canada. These findings represent the second documentation of poliovirus circulation in the United States since wild poliovirus was declared eliminated from the United States in 1979. The previous instance, in 2005, was a type 1 VDPV (4).
The most recent ACIP recommendations addressing adult polio vaccination were published in 2000 (5). In the 2000 publication, a primary polio vaccination series was recommended for unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated adults at increased risk of poliovirus exposure. However, there was no clear recommendation for unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated adults who were not considered to be at increased risk of exposure. The 2022 identification of the paralytic polio case in an unvaccinated young adult and the ongoing circulation of WPV1 and VDPVs globally highlighted the need to re-examine the recommendations for polio vaccination among US adults.Problem
Problem
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the problem of public health importance?
Yes
Poliovirus infection can cause permanent paralysis. Prior to the introduction of polio vaccines, polio outbreaks in the United States (US) were associated with thousands of paralytic cases each year (6). Although vaccination and improved sanitation eliminated indigenous circulation of poliovirus in many countries, including the US, wild poliovirus type 1 and vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) continue to circulate globally (7). In 2022, a case of paralytic polio caused by type 2 VDPV was identified in an unvaccinated young adult in New York state (1). This virus was genetically linked to viruses detected in wastewater in the United Kingdom, Israel, and Canada.Benefits and Harms
Benefits and Harms
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationHow substantial are the desirable anticipated effects?
Large
Humoral immunity: The presence of neutralizing antibody is an accepted correlate of protection against paralytic disease (8). Seroconversion rates and antibody titers following vaccination vary depending on age at first dose and vaccination schedule, but three IPV doses administered ≥2 months apart in infants ≥2 months of age results in ≥95% seroconversion one month after the last dose (9,10).
Vaccine effectiveness: The effectiveness of the original Salk IPV for paralytic polio prevention has been established (11,12). A case-control study using the current enhanced potency formulation of IPV in Senegal found an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 36% for one dose and 89% for two doses (13).
Mucosal immunity: While IPV prevents severe disease, it does not prevent gastrointestinal infection or shedding in the stool (14). However, IPV appears to have an impact on nasopharyngeal shedding. Studies show similar, low (0%–4%) rates of nasopharyngeal shedding following exposure among both OPV and IPV recipients (15,16).
Because IPV is routinely given during childhood, there is a paucity of data on previously unvaccinated adults who receive a primary series.How substantial are the undesirable anticipated effects?
Minimal
Data from more than 20 years of use as part of the routine childhood vaccination schedule have demonstrated that IPV has an excellent safety profile. Local reactions at the injection site were reported during clinical trials, with 14%–29% of recipients reporting tenderness, 3%–11% reporting induration, and 0.5%–1% reporting erythema (17). Concurrent administration of IPV with other vaccines was not associated with increased frequency or severity of reported adverse reactions compared with the other vaccines alone (9,18,19). No serious adverse events have been causally associated with use of the current formulation of IPV (19–21).Do the desirable effects outweigh the undesirable effects?
Favors intervention
Large desirable effects outweigh minimal undesirable effects of vaccination with IPV.Values
Values
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationDoes the target population feel that the desirable effects are large relative to undesirable effects?
Varies
An Annenberg Science Knowledge Survey conducted in October 2022 found that 59% of US adults believed having polio would be “extremely bad”, and an additional 26% said it would be “very bad” (22). Additionally, 85% said they were likely to recommend that an eligible person in their household get vaccinated with the polio vaccine.
Unvaccinated adults in the US are likely a heterogeneous group, and their values might differ from the general population.Is there important uncertainty about or variability in how much people value the main outcomes?
Probably important uncertainty or variability
Unvaccinated adults in the US consist of at least two groups: (1) persons whose families had the opportunity for vaccination but chose not to; and (2) and persons whose families were amenable to vaccination but encountered barriers or missed opportunities for vaccination.Acceptability
Acceptability
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention acceptable to key stakehold-ers?
Probably yes
IPV is currently recommended for unvaccinated adults at increased risk of poliovirus exposure, and booster doses of IPV are available to adults at increased risk of poliovirus exposure. Prevention of paralytic polio has been a public health priority for decades, and IPV vaccination has been well-accepted among stakeholders to date.Resource Use
Resource Use
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention a reasonable and efficient allocation of resources?
Probably yes/Yes
There currently is just one US-licensed manufacturer of stand-alone IPV, and there are an unknown number of adults who believe they are unvaccinated or undervaccinated. New York State and New York City did not experience any significant IPV supply issues in 2022, despite identification of a polio case, national media attention, and a concerted effort by the health departments to vaccinate unvaccinated persons, including adults.
Demand for IPV could potentially exceed supply, particularly if many adults assume they were not previously vaccinated. However, the work group believed this issue could be mitigated by providing guidance about who should be considered unvaccinated in the clinical considerations.Equity
Equity
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationWhat would be the impact of the intervention on health equity?
Probably increased
A recommendation that unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated adults should complete a primary series with IPV would likely increase equity by providing an opportunity to receive catch-up polio vaccination for adults who were not vaccinated as children.
Assuring equitable access to vaccination sites providing IPV will be an important consideration for implementation.Feasibility
Feasibility
Criteria
Work Group Judgements
Evidence
Additional InformationIs the intervention feasible to implement?
Probably yes
Currently, IPV is recommended for unvaccinated adults at increased risk of poliovirus exposure, and previously vaccinated adults at increased risk of poliovirus exposure may receive a booster dose of IPV. These recommendations have been in practice for over 20 years and have been feasible to implement. Changing from a risk-based recommendation to a uniform recommendation for unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated adults could potentially overwhelm health systems if there were a large increase in demand. However, New York State and New York City did not experience any significant supply or distribution issues in 2022, despite identification of a polio case, national media attention, and a concerted effort by the health departments to vaccinate unvaccinated persons, including adults.
General adult medicine offices do not typically stock IPV, so access to vaccination sites that do stock IPV (e.g., health departments and travel clinics) could be a barrier to implementation. There were also concerns about potential effects on health systems and their vaccine screening and patient recall algorithms. However, the work group believed these concerns could be mitigated with clear guidance for who is eligible for vaccination in the clinical considerations.Balance of consequences
For unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated adults known to be at increased risk of exposure to poliovirus: Desirable consequences *clearly outweigh*undesirable consequences in most settings.
For unvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated adults *not* known to be at increased risk of exposure to poliovirus: Desirable consequences *probably outweigh* undesirable consequences in most settings.
Is there sufficient information to move forward with a recommendation? Yes
Policy options for ACIP consideration
ACIP recommends the intervention.
Draft recommendation (text)
Adults (aged ≥18 years) who are known or suspected to be unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated against polio should complete a primary vaccination series with IPV.
Additional considerations (optional)
In general, unless there are specific reasons to believe they were not vaccinated, most adults who were born and raised in the United States can assume they were vaccinated against polio as children. Polio vaccination has been part of the routine childhood immunization schedule for decades and is still part of the routine childhood immunization schedule. Adults who received any childhood vaccines almost certainly were vaccinated for polio.
Final deliberation and decision by the ACIP
ACIP recommends the intervention.
**Adults (aged ≥18 years) who are known or suspected to be unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated against polio should complete a primary vaccination series with IPV.**References
Link-Gelles R, Lutterloh E, Ruppert PS, et al. Public Health Response to a Case of Paralytic Poliomyelitis in an Unvaccinated Person and Detection of Poliovirus in Wastewater — New York, June–August 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71(33):1065–1068. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7133e2.
Ryerson AB, Lang D, Alazawi MA, et al. Wastewater Testing and Detection of Poliovirus Type 2 Genetically Linked to Virus Isolated from a Paralytic Polio Case — New York, March 9–October 11, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71(44):1418–1424. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7144e2.
New York State Department of Health. Poliovirus Wastewater Surveillance Report. https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/polio/docs/waste_water_surveillance_report.pdfAccessed July 27, 2023.
Alexander JP, Ehresmann K, Seward J, et al.; Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Investigations Group. Transmission of imported vaccine-derived poliovirus in an undervaccinated community in Minnesota. J Infect Dis 2009; 199:391–7. doi: 10.1086/596052.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Poliomyelitis Prevention in the United States: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2000; 49(No. RR-5):1–22. PMID: 15580728.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. Hall E, Wodi AP, Hamborsky J, et al., eds. 14th ed. Washington, D.C. Public Health Foundation, 2021.
Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Polio Now: A Map Showing the Latest Number of WPV1 and cVDPV Cases in Each Affected Country. https://polioeradication.org/polio-today/polio-now/ Accessed July 27, 2023.
Sutter RW, Pallansch MA, Sawyer LA, et al. Defining Surrogate Serologic Tests with Respect to Predicting Protective Vaccine Efficacy: Poliovirus Vaccination. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;754:289–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb44462.x.
Vidor E, Meschievitz C, Plotkin S. Fifteen Years of Experience with Vero-Produced Enhanced Potency Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16(3):312–322. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199703000-00011.
Estívariz CF, Pallansch MA, Anand A, et al. Pollio Vaccination Options for Achieving Eradication and Securing the Endgam. Curr Opin Virol 2013;3(3):309–315. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2013.05.007.
Francis T, Korns RF. Evaluation of 1954 Field Trial of Poliomyelitis Vaccine: Synopsis of Summary Report. Am J Med Sci 1955; 229(6):603–612. doi: 10.1097/00000441-195506000-00001.
Melnick JL, Benyesh-Melnick M, Pena R, et al. Effectiveness of Salk Vaccine. Analysis of Virologically Confirmed Cases of Paralytic and Nonparalytic Poliomyelitis. JAMA 1961; 175:1159–1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040130043010.
Robertson SE, Traverso HP, Drucker JA, et al. Clinical Efficacy of a New Enhanced-Potency Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine. Lancet 1988;1(8591):897–899. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91711-4.
Hird TR, Grassly NC. Systematic Review of Mucosal Immunity Induced by Oral and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines against Virus Shedding following Oral Poliovirus Challenge. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8(4):e1002599. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002599.
Kok PW, Leeuwenburg J, Tukei P, et al. Serological and Virological Assessment of Oral and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccines in a Rural Populatino in Kenya. Bull World Health Organ 1992; 70(1):93–103. PMCID: PMC2393334.
Onorato IM, Modlin JF, McBean AM, et al. Mucosal Immunity Induced by Enhance-Potency Inactivated and Oral Polio Vaccines. J Infect Dis 1991; 163(1):1–6. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.1.1.
Sanofi Pasteur. Polio Vaccine Inactivated. Available at https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/Package-Insert-IPOL.pdf Accessed August 7, 2023.
Drucker J, Soula G, Diallo O, et al. Evaluation of a New Combined Inactivated DPT-Polio Vaccine. Dev Biol Stand 1986; 65:145–151. PMID: 3030861.
Wattigney WA, Mootrey GT, Braun MM, et al. Surveillance for Poliovirus Vaccine Adverse Events, 1991 to 1998: Impact of a Sequential Vaccination Schedule of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Followed by Oral Poliovirus Vaccine. Pediatrics 2001; 107(5):E83. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.e83.
Institute of Medicine. Polio Vaccines. In: Stratton KR, Howe CJ, eds. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines. Evidence Bearing on Causality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1994: 187–210.
Iqbal S, Shi J, Seib K, et al. Preparation for Global Introduction of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine: Safety Evidence from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 2000–12. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15(10):1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00059-6.
Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania. What U.S. Adults Know and Believe About Polio and the Bivalent Covid Booster. https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/what-u-s-adults-know-and-believe-about-polio-and-the-bivalent-covid-booster/ Accessed July 21, 2023.Top of Page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  November 2, 2023						Source: 	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeACIP Home
Meeting Information
Committee Informationplus icon
Role of the ACIP in CDC’s Vaccine Recommendations
Charter
Economics Studies
Committee Membersplus icon
ACIP Membership Roster
Apply for ACIP Membership
Work Groupsplus icon
VaST Reportsplus icon
June 28, 2021
May 24, 2021
May 17, 2021
March 29, 2021
Recommendationsplus icon
Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations
Evidence Based Recommendationsplus icon
About GRADE
Grade Evidence Tables
Evidence to Recommendations Frameworks Error processing SSI file


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue