alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 April 19, 2007
    /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. Schaefer 
Co-Chief Executive Officer
07/16/2014

HOW TO APPLY

1. View and print the occupational questionnaire from the job announcement

2. Print and complete the 1203FX form located at: http://www.opm.gov./forms/pdf_fill/OPM1203fx.pdf to provide

your response to the occupational questionnaire

PLEASE NOTE: The numbering of the OPM Form 1203-FX will not match the Occupational/Assessment 

Questions. The Occupational/Assessment Questions restart with number one, so when entering your 

responses in section 25 of the OPM Form 1203-FX, please continue regardless of number sequence. This 

issue has been identified and will be resolved as soon as possible. Applicants are responsible for ensuring 

their responses are transferred accurately.

3. Submit all documents identified under the “Required Documents” section of the vacancy announcement.

4. Fax the completed 1203FX form along with your Required Documents to 1-478-757-3144. Your 1203FX will

serve as a cover page for your fax transmission.

Your Cover Page Should:

• Include the 8-character Vacancy Identification Number identified in the vacancy announcement (Example:

RA123456)

• Provide your Social Security Number and full name in the spaces provided or we will not be able to

associate your document(s) with the rest of your application.

• You may submit multiple documents for the same vacancy announcement using one cover page.

Faxed documents may take 2-3 business days to process

Faxed documents submitted with missing information will not be processed. The following will prevent your

documents from being processed:

• Not using the special cover page mentioned above.

• Missing, incomplete, or invalid Vacancy Identification Number

• Missing or incomplete Social Security Number or name

NOTE: Information on how to prepare a resume may be found

at: http://www.hr.dla.mil/downloads/prospective/resume.pdf
No. 10-7759.

#### James O. Omotosho, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 966,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 77.

178 L. Ed. 2d 795,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00820

- CV

Grant R. MICHAEL, Appell ant

v.

WALTON SIGNAGE, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 21334 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On November 27, 2019, appellant filed a motion for emergency stay of the trial court’s temporary injunction. After considering the motion and appellee’s response filed on December 6, 2019, we DENY the motion for emergency stay.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EK

February17,2015

DearSirorMadam,

Iam writingtoaddmysupporttotheSection333ExemptionPetitionbeingfiledbyThomas

Landecker.Iam aninstrumentratedcommercialpilot(Certificate#3476819),aswellasanAirframe

andPowerplantMechanicwithInspectionAuthorizationbasedatE55for18years.Tom isaninstrument-ratedprivatepilot,andforthepast8yearsIhaveassistedhim inthemaintenanceandinspectionofhisownPiperPA28-181aircraft.InthetimeIhaveknowTom,Ihavefoundhim tobeavery

safetyconsciouspilotwhoisextremelythoroughinhispreparationandflightanalysis.Thefactthat

Tom isintimatelyfamiliarwiththeregulationsgoverningairspaceoperationsleadsmetotheconclu

sionthathewillposenosafetyriskforthoseflyingorontheground.ThefactthatTom willableto

offerhisphotographicservicesviahisUASwouldcreateavastlysaferalternativethanunlicensed

individualsflyingUAwithoutnecessarilyhavinganyknowledgeofairspaceorsafeflyingpractices.

Therefore,IurgetheFAAtoapproveTom’sExemptionPetition.

Sincerely,

EricKritz

EricKritz P.O.Box1141Gualala,94545 t:707.328.2191
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.14. APPENDIX 3.14**

**DEMAND**

2

**AP3.14-**

AP3.14-1

AP3.14
No. 10-11103.

#### Joseph Lynn Thornburgh, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 214,

181 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6594.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*117Same case below, 645 F.3d 1197.
No. 10-11259.

#### Shannon Darrell Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 235,

181 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6957.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3226 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3226

To direct the Secretary of Defense to prohibit the use of firefighting 
 foam containing perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

   Mr. Kim introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to prohibit the use of firefighting 
 foam containing perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Water for Military Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF PFAS BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) Prohibition.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than January 1, 2029, the 
        Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of 
        Defense uses only non-fluorinated firefighting foam, which does 
        not contain covered PFAS.
            (2) Covered pfas.--In this subsection, the term ``covered 
        PFAS'' means a perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance with 
        at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) Study required.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
        a study of the best practices to clean up ground contaminated 
        by perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances.
            (2) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection 
        (a), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) evaluate best practices in the cleanup (not 
                including incineration) of ground contaminated by 
                perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances;
                    (B) determine the estimated costs of the different 
                types of cleanup methods; and
                    (C) estimate the length of time for various types 
                of cleanup methods.
            (3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date on 
        which funds are made available to carry out the study under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that 
        describes--
                    (A) the findings and conclusions of the study; and
                    (B) any recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


Transplant Safety








Information for Healthcare Providers										Related Pages
										Guidelines
Additional Transplant Related Organizations
CDC’s Transplant-Transmitted Infection Toolkitdoctors in surgury
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  October 13, 2022						Source: 	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP)
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeTransplant Safety
Transplant Safety Overviewplus icon
Key Facts
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC’s Role
Outbreak Investigations
Protecting Patientsplus icon
Donor Screening and Testing
Investigating, Tracking and Reporting Infections
Information for Healthcare Providersplus icon
Current Guideline for Organ Transplants
Additional Transplant Related Organizations
CDC’s Transplant-Transmitted Infection Process Antibiotic ResistanceBlood SafetyDialysis SafetyGet Smart for HealthcareHICPACHand HygieneInjection SafetyMedication SafetySepsisVaccine Safety


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-14T17:33:50Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-14T17:33:51Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-14T17:33:51Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12753">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-14T17:33:50Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>O-7384 
</p>
<p>OPINION WITHDRAWN 
& NOT REISSUED </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18542]



[[Page 37567]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Draft 1998-2003 Strategic Plan

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Government Performance and Results 
Act of 1993, the FDIC is soliciting for consideration the views and 
suggestions of stakeholders potentially affected by or interested in 
the FDIC's strategic plan.
    The draft strategic plan covers the six-year period 1998 through 
2003 and provides a framework for implementing the agency's mission of 
contributing to stability and public confidence in the nation's 
financial system. This is accomplished through the FDIC's three major 
program areas--Insurance, Supervision, and Receivership Management--
that work to achieve the following results:
    <bullet> Protection of insured depositors from loss, without 
recourse to taxpayer funding,
    <bullet> Safety and soundness of insured depository institutions,
    <bullet> Protection of consumers' rights and the investment by 
FDIC-supervised institutions in their communities, and
    <bullet> Recovery to creditors of receiverships.
    The plan can be reviewed on the FDIC's website, <a href="http://
www.fdic.gov">http://
www.fdic.gov</a>, in the ``About FDIC'' section.
    Printed copies may be obtained from the FDIC Public Information 
Center by calling 1-800-276-6003 (202-416-6940 within the Washington 
metropolitan area) or sending electronic mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="faaa8f98969399b3949c95babcbeb3b9d49d958cd4">[email protected]</a>

DATES: The comment period closes August 10, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit their written 
comments to: FDIC--Division of Finance, Business Planning Section, Room 
536, 801 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20434 or Internet E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="db88afa9baafbebcb2b88bb7bab59b9d9f9298f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gordon A. Goeke at the addresses 
identified above.

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of July, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18542 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Approved DLMS Change 62

 Revision to DLMS Supplement 856R,

Shipment Status Material Returns

1. ORIGINATOR: Supply Process Review Committee, Ellen Hilert, Co-Chair, DLA 

J673, Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO), 703-767-0676 (DSN 

427), ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply

3. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Revision to DS 856R, Shipment Status Material Returns

b. Description of Change: This change modifies the DS 856R to add an additional 

code required to support DLMS/DLSS conversion and intended DLMS functionality.

c. Procedures: Revise DLMS Supplement for 856R, Ship Notice/Manifest as 

follows:

# Location Revision Reason Federal IC 

1 2/N101/220 Add new qualifier 

Z1 Party to Receive Status

DLMS Note : 1. Use to indicate the 

organization to receive shipment status.

2. As a DLMS enhancement, may be used to 

identify recipients other than the prescribed 

status recipients under DLMS/MILSTRIP 

distribution rules. Use multiple iterations of 

the 2/N1/220 loop to identify shipment status 

recipients, as needed. See introductory 

DLMS note 3a. 

Provides additional 

functionality to 

distinctly identify 

organizations 

receiving this 

transaction.

Add new code. Does 

not require Federal 

IC change prior to 

DS update.

d. Alternatives: None identified.

4. REASON FOR CHANGE: This change supports DLMS implementation and 

desired functionality. The missing code was identified during testing of conversion 

processing. The DI Code FTM may contain a Media Status Code entry which requires 

status to the activity represented by the M/S Code; therefore it is necessary to provide an 
N1 qualifier to identify status recipients.

5. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Supports DLMS implementation

b. Disadvantages: None identified 

6. IMPACT: 

a. Publications. Federal IC 856R and corresponding DoD 4000.25-M DS. All 

applicable revisions will submitted to the Federal IC.

b. DAAS DLMS/DLSS conversion map has been modified to incorporate above 

revision.
No. 11-5500.

#### David Stebbins, Petitioner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 320,

181 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6268.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
FREDDIE ROOSEVELT 

TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4362

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Freddie Roosevelt Taylor, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has 

recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post-conviction 

relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). 

However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously 
dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2001).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
No. 11-6468.

#### Richard Fleming, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 471,

181 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7484.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                          21,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    458,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,000
<PP&E>                                         316,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,100
<BONDS>                                        245,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,000
<SALES>                                      1,381,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,381,500
<CGS>                                          748,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,313,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38


</TABLE>
No. 10-11130.

#### John Michael Fox, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 218,

181 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6462.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 631 F.3d 1128.