alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
125

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Washington

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $63.6 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 8,300

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 104,000

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $2,812 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $471.4 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $150.7 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $622.1 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 10%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$16.4 $20.5 $2.38 $2.97

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$6.3 $9.1 $0.91 $1.32

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $16.0 $25.7 $2.32 $3.73

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$3.9 $5.5 $0.56 $0.80

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$1.9 $2.8 $0.28 $0.40

TOTAL $44.5 $63.6 $6.45 $9.22

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
No. 11-116.

#### Aera Energy LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Ken L. Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

565 U.S. 883, 132 S. Ct. 252,

181 L. Ed. 2d 146,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5533.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 U.S. App. D.C. 213, 642 F.3d 212.
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Charter Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/ Jennifer MagroName:
Jennifer MagroTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofCeres Managed Futures LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
May 13, 2011
SI()-l()()4()l-()()2 

ADC M TON 

SARASOTA MANATEE AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

March 23, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-*ai 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity for Sarasota Bradenton International Airport to 

express our support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposed 

joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The 

proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete 

effectively with the Star and SkyTeaiv. alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits cf the Department's Open Skies 

policy - first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to 

approve this application, as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to 

work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. 

Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering 

customers more service, scheduling, and pricing options, and will help to 

ensure that customers continue to benefit by allowing a choice of three 

competitive air alliances. 

We urge you to approve this application quickly. 

Sincerely, 

Fredrick J, Piccolo,•.A.J^. E'. , 

President, Chief Executive Qfficer 

fredrick.piccolo@srqrairport.com 

COMMISSIpNERS 

Cnrlos Befvff 

Dr. Gafy.Kdmpoinecras 

Eric W. Robinson 

Paul A, Sbarff 

Bob Waeciftfpr 

Leslie Weffls'i 

I-; ;> 

PRESIDENt.^EO 

Frednck J, Piccolo 

6000 Airpcia Circle 

Sarasc*a, Florida 

34243-2105 

TELEPHONE 

(941)359-5200 

FACSIMILE 

(941) 359-5054 

•;rq riiipofi.f.oni
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17850]



[[Page 36659]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense 
(Acquisition and Technology)

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on July 15, 1998. The Committee was recently established to 
advise the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) with 
respect to technology security, counterproliferation, chemical and 
biological defense, sustainment of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and 
other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended 5 U.S.C., Appendix II, has been 
determined that matters affecting national security, as covered by 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1988), will be presented throughout the meeting, and 
that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, 15, July 1998 (8:00 am to 4:00 pm).

ADDRESSES: Room 3E869, the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maj Joseph D. Pierce, Defense Threat 
Reduction Agency Transition Team, Room 3B263, Pentagon, Washington, DC, 
20301-3050. Telephone: (703) 695-5486.

    Dated: June 30, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-17850 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 11-5365.

#### David Ommundson, Petitioner v. Mike Mahoney, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 302,

181 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5751.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6098.

#### Kenneth Ray Bivert, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 511,

181 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7871.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 52 Cal. 4th 96, 127 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261, 254 P.3d 300.
No. 11-5549.

#### Joseph D. Phillips, Petitioner v. Richard James, et al.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 89,

181 L. Ed. 2d 19,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6984.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October *2024, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ALICE BUCKLEY, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1592

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH

- 1221

- 18

- 0096

- W

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted b y the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

July 19, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 19, 2024 Case: 24-1592 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 07/19/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1




                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, the general
partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.
------------------------
Martin E. Stein, Jr.
November 12, 2003
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3305 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2509 George Mason Drive in Virginia Beach, 

Virginia, as the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 3305 RFS

1 SECTION 1. RYAN KEITH COX POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2509 George Mason Drive in Vir4 ginia Beach, Virginia, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ryan Keith Cox Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5995.

#### Theodore Grange, Petitioner v. Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc.

565 U.S. 982, 132 S. Ct. 505,

181 L. Ed. 2d 356,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7778.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 269.
No. 11-353.

#### United States ex rel. Thomas Ubl, Petitioner v. IIF Data Solutions, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 526,

181 L. Ed. 2d 352,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7787.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 650 F.3d 445.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,193
<SECURITIES>                                       593
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         95
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,265
<PP&E>                                          48,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,090
<SALES>                                         21,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,980
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                       775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                751
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,023
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.80
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10699 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS RAMOS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 212

- 1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Luis Ramos has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Ramos h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24 , 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10699 Document: 00512946029 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015No. 14

- 10699

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from furth er responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-10699 Document: 00512946029 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 11-6087.

#### Vincent Underwood, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 928, 132 S. Ct. 364,

181 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7130.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 728.
No. 10-9915.

#### Curtis Van Stuyvesant, Petitioner v. James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 810, 132 S. Ct. 83,

181 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6954.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 11-6290.

#### In re Gerald Lee Patterson, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 439,

181 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7246.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-5994.

#### Zoanne Zeininger, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 967, 132 S. Ct. 462,

181 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7499.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 459 Mass. 775, 947 N.E.2d 1060.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Codethat, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been providedto eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                              RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

                                     Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS







       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-47803) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated
Employee Stock Savings Plan and Trust and in the related Prospectus of our
report dated February 9, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Reliability Incorporated included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.






                                               BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Houston, Texas
March 15, 1996
































                                         25
From: Bahner, Mark A.

Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:32 AM

To: Rochelle Boyd ( Boyd.Rochelle@epa.gov )

Cc: Laney, Michael N.

Subject: Revised stack locations for RTI #195B (Alcoa South Plant, Alcoa, TN)

Hi Rochelle,

Attached is a .jpg and a .kmz (Google Earth) file for Alcoa South Plant in Alcoa, TN. These are the revised

stack locations. They’re corrected because Alcoa reported their stacks in degrees, minutes, and seconds

rather than decimal degrees.

The stack locations in the .jpg and .kmz file are the stack locations that were in the modeling files that

I’ve sent in the last few weeks.

Best wishes,

Mark

Mark A. Bahner

RTI, International

P.O. Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road

Research Triangle Park , NC 27709

- 2194



### Phone: (919) 541

- 6016

Fax: (919) 541

- 7155

Email: bahner@rti.org

Internet: http://www.rti.org
No. 11-6214.

#### Daniel Lee Maxson, II, Petitioner v. Jeffrey Woods, Warden.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 518,

181 L. Ed. 2d 364,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7866.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas

Macy Cruz Ooka

Director

Macy Cruz Ooka returned to Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Guam, 

Marianas, as director in June 2022.

A Pacific Islander from the Island of Guam, Ooka has been employed with 

the federal government for 32 years. She began her career during Operation 

Desert Storm in 1991 as a temporary GS-01 with Navy Supply Depot Security. 

Prior to her current assignment, Ooka was the deputy director of DLA 

Distribution Korea, beginning in June 2018, the temporary director of DLA 

Distribution Hill, Utah, in 2017 and the director of DLA Distribution Guam, 

Marianas from January 2015 - 2017. 

During her career, she has gained valuable experience and demonstrated 

increasing abilities in varied positions such as supply technician, transportation assistant, lead transportation 

assistant, quality assurance and contracting officer representative. 

Ooka continued her career with DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas, and was tasked with various responsibilities, 

building her experience and knowledge. In 2006, she assumed the accountable officer position, responsible for 

inventory valued in excess of $17 million. In 2007, she was promoted to supervisory accountable officer for the 

Inventory Action Team, where she served until promoted to deputy director. 

Ooka’s personal awards include the Civilian Service Award, DLA Civilian Meritorious Service Award, and multiple 

DLA Superior Civilian Service awards for her contributions to performance and accuracy. She was also part of 

the team that was given a commendable rating for the 2012 DLA Distribution Compliance Review. As the deputy 

commander for DLA Distribution Korea from 2018-2022, she received an Exceptional Civilian Service Award 

for substantial and enduring service to the warfighter and nation. She meticulously planned and synchronized 

COVID -19 Operation Warp Speed for over 80,000 vaccines and ancillary kits. 

Ooka was instrumental in providing leadership and oversight and eventual closure of DLA Distribution Korea’s 

contingency warehouse that housed $42 million worth of class one and four material in Busan. She ensured timely 

closure 45 days ahead of the cut off date, redistributing 660 containers of material to various sites with 100% 

accountability, zero safety incidents -- enabling the agency to avoid an $8.2 million bill. 

She is a 1990 high school graduate from Guam Community College, Vocational High School, Mangilao Guam. 

Ooka has attended several technical and leadership schools, including certification courses at the University of 

Maryland, Defense Acquisition University and Army Knowledge Online. Ooka was honored with recognition for 

the successful completion of the DLA Tier II Supervisor Certification Program in July 2010.