alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
92

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Indiana

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $73.5 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 11,100

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 150,700

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $2,930 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $457.2 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $129.5 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $586.7 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 13%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$18.8 $23.5 $2.88 $3.59

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$5.1 $7.3 $0.78 $1.12

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $20.6 $33.1 $3.15 $5.06

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$4.5 $6.4 $0.68 $0.98

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$2.2 $3.2 $0.34 $0.49

TOTAL $51.2 $73.5 $7.83 $11.24

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30577 Conference Calendar

ROBERT DEEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KELLY WARD; BECKY MOSS; BRAD ROGERS; LONNIE NAIL; FRANCIS RASPBERRY; TOMMY GARRETT; RAY HANSON; SHERMAN POWELL; ANNE BRYANT; STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND; NOLAN SLACK; FRANK HAMMOND; DAVID THOMAS; C.A. LEWIS; SARAH BILBERRY; MILLS, Lieutenant; MARK FOSTER; MARY HAMILTON, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-1322

-------------------- April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Deemer, Louisiana state prisoner #120219, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous. He argues that the magistrate judge should have recused himself, that he was improperly convicted of an undefinedNo. 99-30577 -2- prison disciplinary rule, and that he had been denied access to the courts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Deemer’s claim that he was improperly convicted in a prison disciplinary proceeding is barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and is not cognizable in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Deemer’s complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Deemer’s claims that he was denied access to the Administrative Remedy Procedure, that he had been denied privileges in extended lockdown, that his good-time credits had been improperly revoked, and that he had been deprived of his Scrabble game are not addressed by the court as these claims are deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39 ★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■ ■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

● ★

●

★ ●

●

●

●
Exhibit 10.10
 EXECUTION COPY
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
 
   AGREEMENT
  1.
    
    Amendment of Section 3.1(a). Section 3.1(a) of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended and restated as follows:3.1. Base Salary.
 a.
    
    During the Employment Period, the Company agrees to pay to the Executive an
annual base salary in an amount equal to $665,000 (such base salary, as may be adjusted
from time to time pursuant to Section 3.1(b), is referred to herein as the Base
Salary). The Executives Base Salary, less amounts required to be withheld under
applicable law, shall be payable in equal installments in accordance with the Companys
normal payroll practices and procedures in effect from time to time for the payment of
salaries to officers of the Company, but in no event less frequently than monthly.b.
    
    The Company shall review the Executives performance on an annual basis and,
based on such review, may change the Base Salary, as it, acting in its sole discretion,
shall determine to be reasonable and appropriate.
 2.
    
    Reaffirmation. Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment, the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between the
provisions of the Employment Agreement and the provisions of this Amendment, the provisions
of this Amendment shall govern.




---



##### 



CLAIRES STORES, INC.By:
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ James G. ConroyJames G. Conroy 2
No. 10-10948.

#### Maurice Frazier, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 193,

181 L. Ed. 2d 100,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6341.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*101Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 782.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-70033

CHARLES DEAN HOOD Petitioner-Appellant v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTES DIVISION Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-109

Before SMITH, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dean Hood appeals an order of the district court, entered July 11, 2008, denying hismotionsfor appointment ofcounsel and stay of execution. Hood raises only the following issue before this court: “Does the federal appointment statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3599, provide prisoners sentenced United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 4, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-70033

1 278 F.3d 459, 462-63 (5th Cir. 2002).

2 No. 07-8521, 2008 WL 2484732 (June 23, 2008).

3 See, e.g., Hain v. Mullin, 434 F.3d 1168, 1172 (10th Cir. 2006) (“Acknowledging a circuit split on the issue, we nonetheless see no other logical way to read the statute.”).

4 See Turner v. Quarterman, No. 08-70025, 2008 WL 2645674 (5th Cir. July 7, 2008) (per curiam), petition for reh’g en bancdenied (5th Cir. July 10, 2008) (per curiam), cert. denied and application for stay of execution denied, 2008 WL 2690759 (U.S. July 10, 2008). 2 under state law the right to federally appointed and funded counsel to pursue clemency under state law?” We foreclosed this issue in Clark v. Johnson, holding that the statute does not apply to state clemency proceedings. 1 We acknowledge that the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Harbison v. Bell 2 to consider the issue and presumably to address the split among the circuits. 3 A prior panel of this court addressed precisely this issue after the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Harbison, and again held 18 U.S.C. § 3599 inapplicable to such proceedings. 4 Although that decision is unpublished and thus not binding on us, we find it instructive. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order ofthe district court and DENY Hood’s separate motion for stay of execution.
Exhibit 10.55

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPERATOR’S CONTRACT

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPERATOR’S CONTRACT (the “Amendment”) is made this 30th day of June, 2004, by and between ISLE OF CAPRI BETTENDORF, L.C., an Iowa limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the “Operator”) and SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL AUTHORITY, an Iowa not-for-profit corporation (“SCRA”).

 

WHEREAS, Operator and SCRA have entered into an Operator’s Contract dated August 11, 1994 as amended (the “Operator’s Contract”); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Operator’s Contract as provided herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

 

1.                                      Paragraph 4 of the Operator’s Contract is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

“4.                                This Contract shall run until the conclusion of SCRA’s obligations under the Bettendorf Conference Center Support Agreement attached as Exhibit “A”. It is agreed that this Contract shall terminate on the expiration of the license year following such conclusion of SCRA’s obligations provided, however, that so long as Operator has substantially complied with the IRGC rules, (and the SCRA’s gaming license is renewed), Operator is hereby granted the right to renew this Contract for succeeding one year periods, the last of which shall terminate on the last date for licensed gaming as approved by Scott County voters pursuant to Chapter 99F of the Iowa Code. Operator agrees to guarantee SCRA’s payment obligations as set forth on Exhibit “A”.”

 

2.                                      In all other respects the parties hereto ratify and confirm the Operator’s Contract.

 











 

3.                                      This Amendment is expressly subject to approval by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission and will be effective on August 1, 2004. Operator further agrees to pay all legal and accounting expenses of SCRA related to the negotiation, preparation and approval of the Amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
SCOTT COUNTY   REGIONAL AUTHORITY
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Its President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/ Steve Hershberger
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Its Secretary
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ISLE OF CAPRI BETTENDORF,   L.C.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/ Bernard Goldstein (Chairman)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:  Manager
    


 

2
DLA Distribution Korea

Mr. Justano D. Newbold

Deputy Director

Justano D. Newbold is a native of Nassau, Bahamas and became the Deputy 

Commander of DLA Distribution Korea, on May 22, 2022. Newbold has 

been employed with the federal government for 13 years.

Prior to his current assignment, Newbold was the Operation Chief at 

DLA Distribution Korea, beginning in April 2018. He also served as the 

Accountable Officer of the center from June 2017 to March 2021. 

In 2016, he assumed the role as Accountable Officer for DLA Distribution 

Anniston overseeing 21 million dollars of stocks and 17,000 lines. He began 

his career during BRAC at DLA Distribution Anniston in July 2009 and was 

one of two individuals selected as a WG-05 material handler position. After 

three years of positive work performance, he was promoted to a GS-05/07 weapons transportation assistance. 

He demonstrated increasing abilities in various positions such as, transportation assistant, quality assurance 

evaluator, continuous process improvement specialist, and customer service.

In December 2003, Newbold received his Bachelor of Science in finance from Jacksonville State University and 

in January 2005 he received his Master’s in Finance and Accountant from American InterContinental University. 

He has attended several technical and leadership schools, including certification courses at Defense Acquisition 

University and Army Knowledge Online. He is a 1998 high school graduate from McEachern High school in 

Powder Springs Georgia. Newbold is an immigrant from the Bahamas and became naturalized US citizen in 

2006. 

Newbold received the Jerry L. Taylor Award for Individual Outstanding Contribution in 2018. He also 

received a note from Brigadier General Susan A. Davidson for the Hurricane Issac support in October 2012. 

He was awarded the DLA Civilian Meritorious Service Award in 2017 and the Joint Meritorious Unit Award 

in December 2019. Newbold was honored with recognition for the successful completion of the DLA Tier II 

Supervisor Certification Program in March 2021.
### NUMBER 13
- 1 7 - 00 4 54
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ INVESTMENT RETRIEVER S, INC

. , A ppellant ,

v. JESUS CHARNICHART AN D FRANCISCA CHARNICHART , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria Appellant, Investment Retrievers, Inc. , filed an appeal from a judgment entered by
the County Court at Law No. 3 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2016

- CCL

00980 . Appellant ha s filed a motion to withdraw the appeal on grounds t hat it no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant request s that this Court withdraw the appeal.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motio n to withdraw the appeal , is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

De livered and filed the 16th day of November , 20 1 7

.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD08-98-031]
RIN 2115-AE46


Special Local Regulations; Oakmont Yacht Club Regatta Allegheny 
River Mile 12.0-13.0

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements 33 CFR 100.201, ``Annual marine events 
within the Second Coast Guard District'', Table One, number 43, listed 
as ``Oakmont Yacht Club Regatta''. In 1996, the Second Coast Guard 
District was disestablished, and the Eighth District boundaries were 
expanded to include the prior Second District area of responsibility. 
The Eighth District Commander now exercises authority over the combined 
geographical region. 61 FR 29958 (June 13, 1996. This event will be 
held on July 25 and 26, 1998 in Oakmont, Pennsylvania. Implementation 
of section 33 CFR 100.201 (Table One, 43) is necessary to provide for 
the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.201 (Table One, 43) is effective on the following 
dates/times: July 25, 1998 from 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. and July 26, 1998 
from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LT T.J. Ferring, Marine Safety Office, Pittsburgh, PA Tel: (412) 644-
5808.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Oakmont Yacht Club Regatta is a river 
festival sponsored by the Oakmont Yacht Club. These special local 
regulations permit the Coast Guard to control vessel traffic in order 
to ensure the safety of spectators and participants. Spectators will be 
able to view the event from areas designated by the sponsor. Non-
participating vessels will be able to transit the area during breaks 
between scheduled events.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
A. L. Gerfin, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 8th Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 98-17647 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
No. 10-1449.

#### Dorothy C. Simpson, Petitioner v. Estate of Roosevelt Norton, et al.

565 U.S. 822, 132 S. Ct. 108,

181 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6736.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 55 So. 3d 1286.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 04, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 04, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0097. ANTONIO BURCH v. SFT FOODS et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017S04186
# DLA Distribution Head Quarters hosts Audit Readiness Roadshow

/ Published Sept. 17, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
“Victory is within reach!” This is the moto Simone Reba, deputy director of Defense Logistics Agency Finance drove home, at the Sept. 1 DLA Distribution Audit Readiness Roadshow. 

With the Sept. 30 deadline approaching, Reba led a discussion with a room full of distribution employees. She highlighted the agency’s audit readiness accomplishments, which included assertions for areas like funds balance, the hire-to-retire cycle and inventory. 

Audit ready means DLA can prove to auditors from an independent organization that the numbers reflected in our financial statements are reliable and free of any significant misstatements. To achieve this, DLA has taken a closer look at how daily procedures are documented and controlled. They then ensure good controls are in place that mitigate or minimize risks and ensure the numbers cannot be manipulated. 

Just like an annual physical being a good indicator of personal health, an audit will determine the overall financial health of DLA. The efforts taken to become more audit ready have helped the agency make more informed decisions, stretch the budget, increase confidence of financial status and enhance the public’s trust.

“This took a village,” said Reba. “DLA Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch is enthusiastic about the audit readiness process and impressed with the agency’s progress so far. He is committed to keeping it going.”

DLA Distribution’s deputy director, Twila C. Gonzales stressed the importance of “following the process.” She stated that Distribution is the custodian of a lot of inventory, but by following the standard operating procedures we will continue to show that DLA Distribution “has it together.”

“This has been a tremendous journey,” explained Gonzales. “It has taken all of us!”

The roadshow continued with the introduction of the Audit Readiness Panel, which included, Bridget Collins, Audit Readiness deputy program manager, Denise Parker, Audit Readiness Distribution site lead and Kris Bergstrasser, Team KPMG. The panel carefully explained the four phases of the audit cycle. They also took this opportunity to answer questions from the audience.

During the meeting, Reba presented Denise Parker with a letter of appreciation for the efforts put forth by the entire Distribution Audit Readiness team.

“I accept this on behalf of the entire DLA Distribution,” said Parker. “This belongs to everyone across every distribution center.”
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.15. APPENDIX 3.15**

**PHYSICAL INVENTORY REQUEST**

## 

2

**AP3.15-**

AP3.15-1

APPENDIX 3.15
La tuberculosis

¡Proteja a su familia!

Ya llevas más de

3 semanas enfermo...

se puede curar.

La tuberculosis

Si necesita tratamiento,

es de bajo costo o gratis.

Toda su información es privada.

Centro de

Salud

La tuberculosis

es contagiosa.

¡Si tiene estos

síntomas, visite

al médico hoy

mismo!

Para más información vaya al www.cdc.gov/tb/esp/

o llame a:

Pérdida

de peso Fiebre Tos con

sangre

Sudores

mientras

duerme

Tos con flemas

por más de

3 semanas
No. 10-7582.

#### Samuel L. Henderson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1155, 131 S. Ct. 950,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 419.

178 L. Ed. 2d 785,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 736.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3207 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3207

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                  Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT DYLAN ELCHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```