alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPNET, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         55,105
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  41,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,746
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               94,370
<PP&E>                                         13,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36,109
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,108
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,731
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  64,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.57)


</TABLE>
No. 11-5410.

#### Melvin Perez, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 307,

181 L. Ed. 2d 188,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5924.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 60 So. 3d 391.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Matter of the Marriage of John Paul Moncey and Tammie Jo Moncey

No. 06

- 12

- 00054

- CV Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11

- 0192 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Hill * participating . * Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of
the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment finding that the 1967 Chevrolet Corvette, vehicle identification number 194377S100978, was community property and render judgment that it is John Paul Moncey’s separate property. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all other respects

. We further order that the appell ant, John Paul Moncey , pay seventy

- five percent and appellee, Tammie Jo Moncey
, pay twenty

- five percent of the costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 10-9489.

#### Peter Wells, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 828, 132 S. Ct. 123,

181 L. Ed. 2d 46,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5348.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 15 N.Y.3d 927, 915 N.Y.S.2d 896, 941 N.E.2d 739.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Oregon Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Oregon Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on July 24, 1998, at the Double Tree Inn, 
Columbia River, 1401 North Hayden Island Drive, Portland, OR 97217. The 
purpose of the meeting is to plan a future project.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, July 1, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-18257 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                           6,078 
<SECURITIES>                                    48,233 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,979 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000 
<INVENTORY>                                     32,213 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,230 
<PP&E>                                         128,428 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,407 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,403 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,868 
<BONDS>                                            486 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                         1,318 
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,209 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,403 
<SALES>                                        151,436 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,436 
<CGS>                                          133,147 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,147 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,872 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   400 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,017 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,017 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,017 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06 
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132932 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132932 COA: 262671 Wayne CC: 04-012767-01 WADE N. SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             787,961
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,911,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,213,580
<PP&E>                                         106,147,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,732,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,181,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,404,494
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        12,751,100
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,181,437
<SALES>                                         16,115,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,874,051
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,858,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,149,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,646,663)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,502,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,502,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.43)
        


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1928

___________ Debra Lasseter, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Dolgencorp, L.L.C., doing business * as Dollar General Store; Kristine * [UNPUBLISHED] McSparin, * * Appellees, * * Dollar General Store, * * Defendant. *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 2012 Filed: January 20, 2012

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Debra Lasseter, an African Ameri can, appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her civil action alleging that, on account of her race, she was

1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United St ates District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.accused of shoplifting; was stopped, detained , questioned, and searched by police; and was banned from shopping at certain Dollar General Stores. After careful de novo review of the record, see Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist. , 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011), we find no trialworthy i ssues on any of the claims that Lasseter raises. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the motion for sanctions.

_________________________________

-2-
No. 85-1615.

#### Booker et al. *v.*Thomas.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00014

- CV

Virginia BRETADO,

Appellant

v.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District C ourt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 09066

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice (not participating)

Patricia O. Alvarez (recused)

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file appellant’s motion for rehearing is

GRANTED. But see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3 (“A motion for rehearing may be granted by a majority

of the justices who participated in the decision of the case. Otherwise, it must be denie d.). NO

FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED.

I t is so ORDERED on January, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
### NUM BER 13-0 9-00 164- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ M A XIM O VA LD EZ , A pp ellan t, v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On a p p ea l f ro m th e 31 9t h D is tr ic t C o u rt of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

### MEM ORA NDU M OPI NI ON Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Ma x imo Val dez , by and throug h hi s a tt o rn e y, has filed a mot ion to w it hdraw appeal becau se he no lon g er des ires to prosec ute i t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .2(a). W it hout pass ing on the m e rit s of the c ase, we g ra nt t he moti on to w it hdraw appeal and dis mis s t he appe al pursuantto Tex as Rul e of Appe lla te Procedu re 42.2 (a ). H av ing dis mis sed the a ppea l a t appell ant' s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned,

### 2

and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. PERC UR IAM
Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7.2( b)
. Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s 1 1th d ay

of June, 2009.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD OSCAR HAYES, a/k/a Duke, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-78-F) Submitted: July 10, 2001 Decided: July 27, 2001 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary B. Zimmerman, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Oscar Hayes appeals the district court order denyinghis motion to dismiss the indictment because it violated his protection against double jeopardy. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and the conclusions of law de novo. United States v. Green , 139 F.3d 1002, 1004 (4th Cir. 1998). We find that the district court did not err by finding that therewere two separate agreements to distribute marijuana in Pennsylvania. See United States v. Ragins , 840 F.2d 1184, 1190 (4th Cir. 1988); United States v. MacDougall , 790 F.2d 1135, 1144-46 (4th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

 

 

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Of

American Community Properties Trust

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

	I, Cynthia L. Hedrick, Chief Financial Officer of American Community Properties Trust, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Community Properties Trust for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (i) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Community Properties Trust.

 

 

 

 

/s/ Cynthia L. Hedrick
Cynthia L. Hedrick
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUSTAVO ADOLFO PIRIR BOCHE,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71843

Agency No. A087-991-802

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 7, 2019** 

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Gustavo Adolfo Pirir-Boche, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for

withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT),

FILED

AUG 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and denying his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252, and we deny the petition.

The IJ did not abuse her discretion in denying Pirir-Boche’s request for a

continuance. See Peng v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1248, 1253 (9th Cir. 2012) (listing

factors to consider); Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009)

(explaining that the decision to grant or deny a continuance is within “the sound

discretion of the judge and will not be overturned except on a showing of clear

abuse” ). 

The BIA did not err in its conclusion that Pirir-Boche did not establish

membership in a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125,

1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (defining a particular social group as: “(1) composed of

members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with

particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question”). Similarly,

the BIA did not err in concluding that Pirir-Boche failed to demonstrate that the

violence he fears is “on account of” a protected ground. See Ayala v. Holder, 640

F.3d 1095, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2011) (rejecting petitioner’s claim because the

persecution petitioner suffered was personally motivated, rather than “on account

of” his membership in a particular social group). Thus, Pirir-Boche’s withholding

of removal claim fails.

2
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief. The record

does not compel the conclusion that Pirir-Boche is “more likely than not” to be

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if he returns to

Guatemala. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2); see also Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040,

1047 (9th Cir. 2009). Thus, Pirir-Boche’s CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

3
# C_2015213EN.01002104.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — Provident Financial s. r. o. v Zdeněk Sobotka, in the presence of: Združenie na ochranu občana spotrebiteľa HOOS

(Case C-372/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 213/37)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Carl V. Schmidt, certify that:



| | 1. |  | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-KSB of Reliability Incorporated;
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | This annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. |  | The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reliability Incorporated.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                        
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  | /s/    CARL V.
SCHMIDT                 
|                     |  | Carl V. Schmidt Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reliability Incorporated and will be retained by Reliability Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These Certifications shall not be deemed to be filed or part of
the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the registrants filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filing to the Report.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.22. APPENDIX 6.22**

ABBREVIATED MESSAGE ASSET REPORT, ETC.(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)

FROM:  {INSERT ADDRESS OF INITIATOR}

TO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE}

SUBJECT:  MILSTRIP ASSET REPORT

FTE/SMS/2/5910001882725/EA/53188/FB2300/1221/001/Blank/FM2300/J/6C/Blank/ 3AA/ Blank/Blank/DPK/Blank/A/Blank

NOTE:  The above example applies equally to other MRP formats by indicating applicable document identifier code (DIC) and data content displayed in this Appendix.

**SAMPLE**

**1**

APPENDIX 1.22

AP6.22-1

APPENDIX 6.22