alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-63515)  pertaining to the Stock  Compensation  Program and 1994 Non-
Employee  Director  Stock Option Plan of Emerson Radio Corp. of our report dated
June 11,  2001,  with  respect  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Emerson Radio Corp. and  Subsidiaries  included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001.




                                                        /s/Ernst & Young LLP



New York, New York
June 26, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-45; RM-8961]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Tylertown, MS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of TRL Broadcasting Company, 
allots Channel 297A at Tylertown, Mississippi, as the community's 
second local FM service. See 62 FR 06929, February 14, 1997. Channel 
297A can be allotted to Tylertown in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 5.3 
kilometers (3.3 miles) southeast in order to avoid short-spacing 
conflicts with the licensed operation of Station WBBU(FM), Channel 
297A, Baker, Louisiana, and Station WKXI(FM), Channel 298C1, Magee, 
Mississippi. The coordinates for Channel 297A at Tylertown are 31-05-27 
NL and 90-05-47 WL. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 2, 1998. A filing window for Channel 297A at 
Tylertown, Mississippi, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the 
issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by 
the Commission in a subsequent order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-45, adopted January 7, 1998, and 
released January 16, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Mississippi, 
is amended by adding Channel 297A at Tylertown.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1837 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18354]



[[Page 37368]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-304-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 409, to be 
effective August 1, 1998.
    Natural states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-
1-007.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18354 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7570.

#### Robert Forte, Petitioner v. Christine Barber, et al.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1014,

178 L. Ed. 2d 842,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 899,

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### *In re Marriage of Carpenter,*

No. 91746-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72830-0-1, April 20, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1008. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-11070.

#### Pierre Buissereth, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 210,

181 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6563.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 114.
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S. Steven Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 4, 2010



By

/s/ S. Steven SinghS. Steven SinghChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board


This certification
accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
No. 10-10780.

#### Oloyea D. Wallin, Petitioner v. F. Dycus, et al.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 171,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6298.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 819.
No. 10-10453.

#### Donald David Delahanty, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6343.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

*62Same case below, 226 Ariz. 502, 250 P.3d 1131.
No. 10-10583.

#### Arthur S. Thompson, Petitioner v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 841, 132 S. Ct. 152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6236.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                      137414
<SECURITIES>                                  3456
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 109464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            290018
<PP&E>                                      304023
<DEPRECIATION>                              137244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              702099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        96855
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      2526
<OTHER-SE>                                  396224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                702099
<SALES>                                     846898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            846898
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               409852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            298251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             138795
<INCOME-TAX>                                 50860
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          87935
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 87935
<EPS-BASIC>                                 1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.71


</TABLE>
No. 10-10826.

#### Ubaldo M. Gutierrez, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 177,

181 L. Ed. 2d 88,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6417.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 952.
**JULY 2001**

**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP2.17. APPENDIX 2.17**

**RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DISCREPANCY/INFORMATION INDICATOR CODES**

**AP2.17-**

AP2.17-1

APPENDIX 2.17
# C_2013171EN.01003802.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/38

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — Lucart France v Commission

(Case T-234/13)

2013/C 171/74

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lucart France (Torvilliers, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Larry Edwards, certify that:



| | 1. |  | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-KSB of Reliability Incorporated;
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | This annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. |  | The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reliability Incorporated.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                           
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  | /s/    LARRY
EDWARDS                                                      
|                     |  | Larry Edwards Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reliability Incorporated and will be retained by Reliability Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These Certifications shall not be deemed to be filed or part of
the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the registrants filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filing to the Report.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50279

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSENDO MONTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-91-CR-159(9)

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosendo Montes appeals the district court’s denial of an

additional one-level reduction in his offense level for

acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1(b) of the U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines. He argues that the district court did not

address whether he timely assisted the Government by cooperating.

The record indicates that Montes did not enter a guilty plea

until approximately two weeks before trial which did not enable

the Government to avoid preparing for trial. Although the 
No. 96-50279

- 2 -

district court did not expressly state whether Montes timely

cooperated with the Government, the district court implicitly

determined that Montes did not satisfy the requirements for an

additional one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. 

Montes has not shown that the district court clearly erred in

denying the additional reduction. See United States v. Tello, 9

F.3d 1119, 1124-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
No. 11-5218.

#### In re Maurice Grayton, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 88,

181 L. Ed. 2d 19,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6609.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, April 09, 2022*

*Change 14*

**AP6. APPENDIX 6**

**FORMS/MESSAGE FORMATS INDEX**

208

APPENDIX 1

AP6-2

			APPENDIX 6
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF STEVEN V. GUMMER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Steven V. Gummer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NeXplore Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

March 10, 2008

| | /s/    STEVEN V. GUMMER
| | -----------------------
| | Steven V. Gummer       
| | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan IIIThomas L. Monahan IIIChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006/s/ Timothy R. YostTimothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2006
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.19-1 APPENDIX 3.19

AP3.19. APPENDIX 3.19

LOGISTICS REASSIGNMENT DELINQUENT DUE-IN 

RESPONSE

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DLD.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO) 

4-6 Enter RIC of the gaining item manager to 

which this transaction is being forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

National Stock 

Number

8-22 Enter NSN of the item.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity (Due-In) 25-29 Enter open quantity due-in, preceding 

significant digits with zeros.1

Various Fields 30-50 In reply to follow-up, perpetuate from DIC

DLC transaction. When providing revised 

due-in EDDs as they occur, perpetuate data 

provided in DIC DDX or DFX memorandum 

due-in.

Call/Order Number 51-54 Enter legacy four-position call/order number 

associated with the PIIN, if applicable; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Quantity (Received) 55-59 Enter DIC D4_ or D6_ quantity received. 

Zero fill if none received. Leave blank if 

data not available.

Blank 60-64 Leave blank.

Asset Transfer Status 65-66 Enter appropriate code from appendix 

AP2.10 of this manual.

Routing Identifier 

Code (Storage 

Activity)

67-69 Enter RIC of the storage activity to which the 

item is due-in.

1 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.1.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.19-2 APPENDIX 3.19

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Blank 70 Leave blank.

Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code of the item duein.

Date 

(Estimated Delivery)

72-76 For Asset Transfer Status Code AF, enter 

the last two digits of the calendar year and 

ordinal day of the calendar year of the 

revised estimated delivery date; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM)

77-79 Enter RIC of the losing item manager 

preparing this transaction.

Blank 80 Leave blank.
No. 10-11226.

#### Stephen R. Winn, Petitioner v. Perry Phelps, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 230,

181 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7136.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-1316.

#### Sylvia Spencer, et al., Petitioners v. World Vision, Inc.

565 U.S. 816, 132 S. Ct. 96,

181 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6689.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 633 F.3d 723.
It's time...

#WorldTBDay #ItsTime
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Richard Goldenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.







Dated:
          August 12, 2005
 /s/ Richard
                  GoldenbergRichard
                    GoldenbergChief
                    Financial Officer