alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER63**

**OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**

 

I,Jeffrey R. Mistarz, the Chief Financial Officer of Lime Energy Co., certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

1.              The Quarterly Report Under Section 13or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for theQuarterly Period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.              The information contained inthe Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30,2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.

 

 
| /s/  Jeffrey R. Mistarz  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey  R. Mistarz      |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| August 10,  2010    |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.3


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers, L.P. , hereby certify, based on my knowledge , that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Centers, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Regency Centers, L.P.


Date: November 8, 2011





/s/ Martin E. Stein, Jr.Martin E. Stein, Jr.Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation, general partner of registrant
No. 11-5588.

#### Jesus Manuel Diaz-Orozco, aka Manuel Ortega, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 915, 132 S. Ct. 331,

181 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6387.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5784.

#### William Stamps, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 347,

181 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6780.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5437.

#### Scott Christopher Howe, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 311,

181 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5936.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 579.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3144 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whittier, California, 

as the ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3144 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JOSE RAMOS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 8520 Michigan Avenue in Whit4 tier, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jose Ramos Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-9204.

#### Omar Chavez, et al., Petitioners v. The Medical Assurance Company, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 828, 132 S. Ct. 123,

181 L. Ed. 2d 45,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6208.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000634

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DANE EVANS and DIANE EVANS, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim 

Defendants-Appellees, v. SUZANNE JOSEFOWSKI,

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC171001427)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Fujise, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On October 22, 2020, Defendant/Counterclaim

Plaintiff-Appellant Suzanne Josefowski (Josefowski) filed the

notice of appeal through counsel;

(2) On June 25, 2021, the court granted Josefowski's

counsel's May 26, 2021 motion to withdraw as counsel and June 23,

2021 motion for a second extension of time for the statement of

jurisdiction and opening brief. The court ordered the appellate

clerk to mail a copy of the order to Josefowski at the address

listed in counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel, and the court

extended the deadline for the statement of jurisdiction and

opening brief to July 26, 2021. The same day, the appellate

clerk mailed a copy of the June 25, 2021 order to Josefowski;

(3) Josefowski failed to file the statement of

jurisdiction and opening brief, or request another extension of

time;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000634

08-SEP-2021

08:48 AM

Dkt. 39 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) On August 3, 2021, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing Josefowski that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on August 13,

2021, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Josefowski could request relief from

default by motion; and

(5) Josefowski took no further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 8, 2021.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise

Associate Judge

2
IN REPLY 

REFER TO DLMSO 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 

HEADQUARTERS 

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD 

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-622 1 

MAR 0 3 2005 

MEMORANDUM FOR SUPPLY PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS 

SUBJECT: Approved Defense Logistics Management System (DLMS) Change 

(ADC) 159, Administrative Revision to DLMS Supplement 867D, 

Demand (Supply) 

The attached administrative change to DOD 4000.25-M, DLMS, is approved for 

implementation. The updated DLMS Supplement will be posted to the Defense Logistics 

Management Standards Office (DLMSO) Web site (http://www.dla.mil/j6/dlniso/ICs/Default.htm) within 30 days from the above date for implementation 

planning. 

Addressees may direct questions to the DLMSO point of contact, Ms. Mary Jane 

Johnson, e-mail: Mary.Jane.Joh_n_~nn@d!a~mil~ Others must contact their Component 

designated Supply Process Review Committee representative. 

I mrector 

Defense Logistics Management 

Standards Office 

Attachment 
Approved DLMS Change 159 

Administrative Correction to DLMS Supplement 867D, Demand (Supply) 

1. ORIGINATOR:

 a. Service/Agency: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO) 

 b. Originator: Mary Jane Johnson, DLMSO, Email: Mary.Jane.Johnson@dla.mil.

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply 

3. REQUESTED CHANGE:

 a. Title: ADC 159, Administrative Correction to DLMS Supplement 867D, Demand 

(Supply) 

 b. Description of Change: This update corrects a DLMS note in the 867D 

Supplement.

c. Procedures: Revise 867D DLMS Supplement as follows: 

 

Item # Location DS 867D Revision 

Demand 

Reason Federal IC 

Impact 

1. 2/REF01/30 Revised DLMS note 1 to read: 

1. Use only one of codes 1I, EQ, FQ, MF, 

NS, S6, WL, XD and ZZ to identify the 

material affected by the catalog/stock list 

change. Must use National Stock Number 

(NSN) (code NS) when known, except when 

appropriate brand name subsistence items 

are identified by the Subsistence 

Identification Number.

Administrative 

correction to reflect 

the correct qualifiers 

in the note. 

Erroneous qualifiers 

A1, A2, A4, FB, FS, 

MG, and YP had been 

identified. 

No impact. 

5. ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES:

 a. Advantages: Administrative correction to reflect accurate note in DS 867D. 

 b. Disadvantages: None. 

6. IMPACT: DOD 4000.25-M, DLMS Supplement 867D. No revision required to 

867D Federal IC.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
F. Adair, as Chief Financial Officer of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 9, 2006



By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 32.2




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Regency Centers Corporation,
the general partner of Regency Centers, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Bruce M. Johnson
--------------------
Bruce M. Johnson
November 12, 2003
No. 10-10428.

#### Vinh Hung Lam, Petitioner v. Citigroup, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 836, 132 S. Ct. 142,

181 L. Ed. 2d 60,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5651.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









The undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of DCAP
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Barry B. Goldstein


Barry B. Goldstein


Chief Executive Officer







/s/ Victor
Brodsky


Victor
Brodsky


Chief Accounting Officer
and


Principal Financial
Officer
No. 11-5755.

#### Robert Henry Moormann, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 346,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6834.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 1102.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. McMahon, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON                                                           
|Thomas R. McMahon Vice
President (Principal Financial Officer) November 12, 2010
97

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Maine

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $15.9 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 2,400

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 27,000

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $811 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $139.7 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $51.0 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $190.7 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 8%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$4.1 $5.2 $3.08 $3.91

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$1.6 $2.3 $1.20 $1.73

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $4.0 $6.3 $3.01 $4.74

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$1.0 $1.4 $0.73 $1.04

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.5 $0.7 $0.36 $0.52

TOTAL $11.2 $15.9 $8.38 $11.94

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
No. 11-5154.

#### Ruben Olivares-Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 275,

181 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5744.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.44-1 APPENDIX 3.44

AP3.44. APPENDIX 3.44

SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT REQUEST

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DYA, DYB, DYL, or DYM, as 

appropriate.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point

(ICP) to which this transaction is being 

forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity 25-29 Enter quantity required, preceding 

significant digits with zeros. If the quantity 

exceeds 99,999, additional transactions will 

be prepared and submitted for the remaining 

balance.1

Document Number 30-43 Enter document number controlling this 

transaction.

Suffix 44 Enter consecutive alpha codes A through Z 

when assignment of suffix codes is 

necessary.2

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Enter DoDAAC of the expected ship-to 

address; otherwise, leave blank.

Multiuse 51-56 For intra-Component use, enter data 

prescribed by the Component. For interComponent use, leave blank.

Project 57-79 Enter project code; otherwise, leave blank.

Coast Designation 60 Enter E if consignee location is east of the 

Mississippi River, Atlantic, Europe, Near 

east, Africa, Central, or South America. 

Enter W if consignee location is other than 

above.

Blank 61 Leave blank.

1 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.1.

2 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.3.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.44-2 APPENDIX 3.44

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Date Indicator 

(Support)

62-64 The first day of the month by which it is 

anticipated materiel will be requisitioned for 

the program. Enter last digit of the calendar 

year and 2-digit month signifying the support 

date; e.g., 503 is 2005, month of March. 3

Advice 65-66 Enter MILSTRIP Advice Code 2B 

(requested item only will suffice; do not 

substitute/interchange); otherwise, leave 

blank.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the activity submitting this 

request.

Purpose 70 Enter purpose code of item; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code of item 

required.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Routing Identifier

Code

73-75 If the activity submitting the SPR is not the 

originator of the requirement, enter the RIC

of the originator; otherwise, leave blank.

Generic Submission 76 For clothing and footwear, enter the alpha G 

to indicate that this is a generic submission 

and that the stock number indicated is the 

first size in the series. When used, it will 

indicate that the quantity entered in record 

positions 25-29 represents the total 

requirements for the generic item. This 

quantity will be converted by the ICP to 

individual sizes using the applicable tariff.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank. 

3 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.4.
No. 11-5098.

#### Rhonda Taylor, on Behalf of Kevin R. Gordon, Petitioner v. Brad Livingston, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 268,

181 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5219,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 473.
No. 10-10929.

#### David Lam Vuong, Petitioner v. Debra Dexter, Warden.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 191,

181 L. Ed. 2d 99,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6568.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5848.

#### Larry Green, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 351,

181 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6884.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*222Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 520.
*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.25. APPENDIX 6.25**

**ISSUE RELEASE/RECEIPT DOCUMENTLASER PRINTED FORM WITH LOGMARS BAR CODING[footnoteRef:1]** [1:  Unit prices obtained via electronic interfaces which are not constrained by the MILSTRIP field size will reflect the unit price as 9 digits for dollars and 2 digits for cents.   If total price exceeds available space for display on the printed form, the generating application may leave blank.  Refer to ADC 221.] 

 (SAMPLE)

***1***

APPENDIX 1.25

AP6.25-1

APPENDIX 6.25

# image1.emf
# C_2015138EN.01002101.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Ralph Prankl

(Case C-175/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 92/12/EEC - General arrangements for products subject to excise duty - Imposition of duty on smuggled goods - Goods released for consumption in one Member State and transported to another Member State - Determination of the competent Member State - Right of the transit State to impose duty on those goods))

(2015/C 138/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Ralph Prankl

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that, where goods subject to excise duty that have been smuggled into the territory of a Member State are transported, without the accompanying document prescribed in Article 7(4) of that directive, to another Member State, in the territory of which those goods are discovered by the competent authorities, the transit Member States are not permitted also to levy excise duty on the driver of the heavy goods vehicle who transported them for having held those goods for commercial purposes in their territory.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 15, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 15, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0457. FLORI S. WATERS v. NEHEMIAH SLAUGHTER . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CV10085