DLMSO May 20, 1997

MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS) Supply

Process Review Committee (PRC) Meeting, May 5-9, 1997

The attached minutes of the DLMS Supply PRC meeting are

forwarded for your information and appropriate action.

PRC members should note that the next meeting is rescheduled

for June 16-20, 1997. An agenda will be provided under separate

cover.

The DLMSO points of contact are Supply PRC Co-Chairs: 

Ms. Ellen Hilert, at (703) 767-6117, DSN 427-6117, or e-mail:

ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil; and Ms. Mary Jane Johnson, DSN 427-6123,

(703) 767-6123, or e-mail: maryjane_johnson@hq.dla.mil. 

/s/

JAMES A. JOHNSON

Director

Defense Logistics Management

Standards Office

Attachment 

DISTRIBUTION: 

ADUSD(L)MDM

Supply PRC Representatives and Attendees
DLMSO May 19, 1997

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS) Supply

Process Review Committee (PRC) Meeting, May 5-9, 1997

Purpose: The Defense Logistics Management Standards Office

(DLMSO) hosted a Supply PRC meeting on May 5-9, 1997, at the

Headquarters Complex, Ft. Belvoir, VA. The primary focus of this

meeting was DLMS implementation convention (IC) review. 

Additional discussion topics are noted below. The agenda is

shown at Enclosure 1. A list of attendees is shown at Enclosure

2. 

Brief Summary of Discussion: Ms. Ellen Hilert and Ms. Mary

Jane Johnson, Supply PRC Co-Chairs, provided opening remarks and

facilitated discussion of agenda items below.

Review of Prior Meeting Agenda Items:

a. Proposed DLMS Change 1, DD Form 1348-1B, Issue

Release/Receipt Document, and DD Form 1348-2A, Issue Release/

Receipt Document with Address Label. The Services/Agencies were

reminded that they must provide comments to DLMSO. The original

due date was March 10, 1996.

b. PMC 40, Processing Cooperative Logistics Supply

Support Arrangement (CLSSA) Requisitions. DLMSO will release the

Approved Change in accordance with the Service/Agency agreements

reached at the November PRC meeting.

c. AMC 45, Defense Program for Redistribution of

Assets (DEPRA) Follow-up Timeframes. This change identifies the

DEPRA processing actions when denial status is received during

the 30-day period after which the Redistribution Order (RDO) was

created and eliminates CB status to the customer by DEPRA when

passing the requisition to the ICP/Integrated Material Manager

(IMM) for processing. DAASC clarified that the BN status will

only be furnished when confirmation of shipment has been

received. This will prevent problems associated with

deobligating funds prematurely based upon the redistribution

order.
2

d. DD Form 1348-2, Issue Release/Receipt Document with

Address Label. DLMSO will clarify current MILSTRIP procedures

regarding the interchangeability of the DD Form 1348-1A with the

DD Form 1348-2 and the authority to use the DD Form 1348-2

without preprinted postage data on the attached address label.

e. DLMS Baseline. American National Standards

Institute, ANSI X-12, Version 003060 ICs are available on the

DLMSO home page at http://www.dlmso.hq.dla.mil. These are

considered the baseline for the DLMS. Modifications resulting

from PRC review will be posted to the home page and identified by

the date prepared. Mr. Featherstone, LMI, explained that the 

8-position revised date structure will not be available until the

4010 release. He further clarified the significance of the

“Draft Standard for Trial Use” statement which appears on all

DLMS ICs. National standards are approved at 3-5 year intervals

(after the trial-use period) and, therefore, are largely out of

date by the time of release. DLMS IC will continue to reflect

the “draft” status within the ANSI narrative although approved

under DLMS. 

f. DLMS Configuration Control. Based upon Component

concern, DLMSO has agreed to return to the Request For

Implementation Date (RFID) process. An updated register of DLMS

proposed/approved changes was distributed. A listing showing the

status of ICs is now available on the DLMSO Home Page. Other

enhancements of the home page were discussed including the

addition of meeting minutes. Hard-copy minutes will only be

mailed upon request by the Component. Routine distribution will

be provided by e-mail with a signed copy available on the home

page.

Action: The DLMSO Logistics Data Manager (LDM) will update the

DLMS manual to reflect the RFID.

g. Service-Unique Requirements Under DLMS. DLMSO

reiterated the need for the Services/Agencies to address

requirements for incorporation of new or existing Service-unique

data/transaction formats within the DLMS. All proposed changes

must be documented and coordinated under the change proposal

process.

Action: The Navy will submit a change proposal for the

Cognizance Code. Other Components should address unique internal

requirements for possible enhancement of the DLMS. 

h. Plant Clearance and Automated Redistribution Supply

System (PCARSS). At the March PRC meeting, the Committee
3

expressed concern that ICs for the PCARSS are being finalized

outside the DLMS. Functions similar to those in the DLMS have

been mapped independently in contradiction to the DISA/LFWG

concept of maintaining a single standard IC for like processes. 

Action: DLMSO administrators will seek additional information.

i. Concurrent Identification of the Department of

Defense Identification Code (DoDIC) and the National Stock Number

(NSN). The Army will assess the need for identification of the

DoDIC for ammunition items in addition to or instead of the

National Stock Number (NSN). Current procedures require use of

the NSN when known and do not permit inclusion of the DoDIC as

secondary information. 

Action: The Army will submit a change proposal if needed.

j. Concurrent Identification of Purpose Code and

Ownership Code. Current procedures restrict use to only one of

the two data elements per transaction. This perpetuates MILSTRAP

procedures under the DLMS.

Action: The Components will assess requirements and submit a

change proposal if needed.

May Agenda Items:

a. Proposed DLMS Change 10, Identification of Flight

Safety Critical Aircraft Parts (FSCAP) In Issue, Release, and

Receipt Documents. This change adds identification of FSCAP to

the Defense Turn-In Document/DLMS transaction. In response to

DLMSO follow-up action, AF comments have been forwarded and the

DLA response is in coordination. 

Action: DLMSO will review Components comments to determine

appropriate action.

b. Approved DLSS/DLMS Change 9, Validation of F/AD I

Activities. This change established an automated process to

validate F/AD I requisitions using a table of authorized activity

DoDAACs maintained at the DSDC/Defense Automatic Addressing

System Center (DAASC). Unresolved classification issues have

delayed implementation. Mr. Trepal, DUSD(L/MDM), reported slow

progress in this area. DAASC has estimated the cost of providing

a secure environment at both the Dayton and Tracy locations at

$1.5 million with an additional $.5 million for yearly

maintenance. In the interim, the Components (except Navy) have

pursued verification of perceived abuse using the DAASC prepared

inquiry. The Marine Corps reported that the inquiry reflected
4

requisitioning related to deployed planes. DLA research found

additional (somewhat bizarre) errors in preparation of the cited

requisitions and will ensure correction. 

Action: Mr. Trepal will continue to monitor status of security

issues and advise the PRC. Results of on-going investigations

will be reported at the next meeting.

c. Service/Agency Initiatives to Capture DESEX

Requisitions. Requisitions input via DESEX (direct telephone

entry) may bypass DASC depending upon Component processing. 

Should this occur, the transactions would not be included for

pipeline performance measurement and would bypass the DASC edit

of the priority designator for validation of F/AD assignment. 

DLA is currently working on a systems change which will provide

an image of the DESEX transactions to DASC. Navy routes DESEX

requisitions to DASC where they are processed and returned to the

ICP. Information regarding Air Force use of DESEX and Army

processing (BE9 creation) were not clear at the time of the

meeting. Discussion generated additional concerns regarding

monitoring of financial obligations resulting from DESEX

requisitions.

Action: The Logistics Metrics Analysis Reporting System (LMARS)

Committee Chair, Mr. Jackie Carter, advised the PRC that the

LMARS Committee will address this issue as it concerns pipeline

measurement.

d. Proposed DLMS Change 6, Material Returns

Discrepancies. This change adds a cautionary statement to

MILSTRIP/DLMS advising shipping activities that they could be

subject to recoupment action for costs incurred by the receiving

activity for discrepant or unauthorized (not ICP-directed)

returns. After further discussion and input from the MILSBILLS

Administrator, the Components concurred with release of the

change as revised.

Action: DLMSO will issue the approved change. Based upon

Components suggestion, DLMSO will consider recommending a

corresponding change to the DoD 4140.1-R, Material Management

Regulation.

e. AMCLs 11 (MILSTRIP) and 15 (MILSTRAP), Expanded

Materiel Receipt Acknowledgment (MRA) Procedures 

(1) Management Evaluation. As written in 1990,

AMCL 11 required data collection and submission under MILSTEP and

monthly internal management reporting by the ICP. Pipeline

performance measurement under the modernized LMARS will be
5

captured by DAASC eliminating the need for separate Component

systems to record and submit the data. The LMARS Committee Chair

concurred that LMARS should replace reporting requirements

specified in the AMCL. This does not relieve the MILSTRAP Focal

Points of the AMCL 11 requirement to assure that a management

evaluation program is implemented to monitor and evaluate MRA

submission to assure compliance with MRA requirements. 

(2) Pseudo Shipment Status Transaction (ASH)

Format and Routing. DAASC requested review of the AMCL 15

MILSTRIP ASH transaction format to verify proper identification

of the customer routing identifier code (RIC) (DAASC vs. ICP). 

The PRC agreed that the DAASC RIC is inappropriate for the

transaction, but noted that systems already in compliance with

the AMCL do not need immediate revision. It was agreed that

DAASC will overlay the ASH RIC in positions 4-6 with the RIC from

positions 67-69; Component system changes will be made when

practical. Additionally, DAASC proposed that the ASH transaction

be routed in the same manner as the Material Receipt

Acknowledgment Followup (DFR), i.e., to the ship-to activity as

identified by the signal code (to the ILCO for Security

Assistance or back to the ICP if the ship-to is not determined). 

Under the AMCL procedures, the ASH transaction is also delivered

to multiple activities based upon the media and status Code and

the distribution code possibly resulting in some confusion. The

PRC agreed to this change. 

(3) Financial Interface Requirements. One goal

of the approved change is to improve interface between supply

financial functions and operations, particularly in regards to

fast pay and source acceptance contracts and in the area of

intransit control. The procedures do not specify how this is to

be accomplished . The MILSBILLS Administrator recommended that

Components seek specific guidance from financial experts within

their organization.

Action: DLMSO will issue addendums to AMCLs 11/15 approving

above changes for the ASH transaction and reporting requirements

for management evaluation. The LMARS Committee will assume

responsibility for defining reporting requirements under the

LMARS. As a minimum, the report should provide for the data

identified in AMCL 11 as necessary for management evaluation of

MRA requirements. Components will address financial interfaces

internally. The MILSCAP Administrator will be requested to

assist the PRC in determining how to pursue requiring use of the

ASH transaction by contractors acting as ICPs.

f. Development of a DoD Standard Weapons Systems

Designator Code (WSDC). The PRC revisited the problems
6

associated with earlier attempts to implement a standard WSDC and

the advantages of doing so under the DLMS. The PRC concurred

with the DLMSO recommendation that the PRC pursue development of

a change proposal for DLMS implementation only, using an existing

set of codes as the baseline. There was discussion about the

need for supporting procedures to delineate application of the

WSDC possibly in metrics, in maintaining readiness, or in

resource allocation. Ms. Margaret Gandy, DLA, explained the DLA

WSDC system application to be fielded this summer. Components

required additional time to analyze requirements for the WSDC at

the component/subassembly level.

Action: Components will research requirements and provide

feedback to DLMSO by July 2, 1997. Coding structure and desired

level of identification should be addressed. If adequate

information is provided, DLMSO will offer a strawman proposal at

the July PRC meeting. Also at the July meeting, DLA will offer a

preview of their new system using either screen prints or a

demonstration. 

g. Implementation Convention (IC) Review. The

following ICs were reviewed: 

(1) TS 846 (LS54) Asset Reclassification. 

Changes recommended at the January PRC meeting were reviewed. A

few additional minor changes were noted.

(2) TS 856 (LS14) Shipment Status . Minor changes

were recommended and the N1 segment needed additional

clarification. DAASC will correct their conversion program to

accommodate the generation of the shipment status format from the

material release confirmation as addressed in the DLMS Manual

(Vol II, paragraph 5.7.1.3.1). The Marine Corps will evaluate

the need for inclusion of the break bulk point and document this

on a change proposal if appropriate. DLA is requested to verify

whether the shipment value for DRMO intransit control has

increased from the $800 indicated in the IC (REF/Code 21). 

(3) TS 846 (LS55) Physical Inventory/Transaction

History. Minor changes were noted.

(4) TS 846 (LS58) Location Reconciliation. Based

upon DLA’s request, this transaction will be modified to indicate

that it is submitted to a single manager (no table 2 “TO”

address). The Army will verify the deletion of the lot/segment

number. The document number was added as an enhancement to

support individual transaction accountability. To reduce

confusion, DLMSO will assure that either the DLMS manual or IC 
7

discuss the purpose of the document number. There may be a

significant problem with converting this transaction between the

DLSS and the DLMS due to the loss of packaging control

information. DLA was asked to document their concerns. Should a

satisfactory resolution not be found, DLMSO will restrict the use

of this transaction for single system use (no conversion). 

(5) TS 947 (LS16) Inventory Adjustment. The Air

Force will evaluate opening the qualifier AU, Damaged in

Facility, for general use. It is currently restricted to bulk

petroleum use. An alternative would be to modify the note for

qualifier AJ. DLA will evaluate using a second iteration of the

material identification information when reporting a

reidentification. Change proposals will be submitted as

appropriate.

Action: The Shipment Status IC will be represented to the PRC at

a future meeting. The three physical inventory ICs and the asset

reclassification IC will be updated as discussed and submitted to

the DoD Logistics Functional Work Group (LFWG). 

h. Additional Discussion and Action Items

(1) Security Assistance Data Requirements. 

Mr. Featherstone suggested that DLMSO reevaluate the requirement

to perpetuate numerous data elements now included for Security

Assistance information. He indicated that some data elements may

be eliminated in favor of adding more specific information about

the location to which the material should be shipped.

(2) Hazardous Material Data Requirements. 

Mr. Featherstone suggested that the PRC look into requirements

for transmission of hazardous material information. He noted

that the LH1 segment is available in some transaction formats. 

Issues for consideration include assessing the benefits of

passing data which may be accessible in a database.

(3) Table 1/Table 2 Mapping. Mr. Featherstone

explained the difficulty associated with processing transactions

containing a substantial number of data elements which are

subject to override. He indicated that the LFWG asked that the

DLMS-to-DLSS conversion data elements (DIC, signal code, fund

code, etc.) be removed from table 1. Mr. Brown, representing

DAASC, indicated that the DIC in table 1 was intended to

facilitate the conversion process and removal would be quite

detrimental. Mr. Featherstone explained that the table 1 values

should be considered as header data, applicable to the entire

transaction. However, DLMSO has typically viewed inclusion of

additional data elements in table 1 as appropriate if it is
8

possible that the same value for that data element might apply to

all transactions batched in the transaction set. Considering the

possibility of smaller batches, it seems appropriate that more

data would remain constant.

Action: DLMSO must evaluate the mapping policy and provide a

response to the LFWG. There may be an impact on ICs already

reviewed which contain recently added table 1 override data

elements and the “conversion” data elements. 

(4) Document Number Date Format. Mr. Featherstone

informed the PRC that the LFWG is concerned about the date

contained within the document number. As representatives of DISA,

they must consider all date formats for compliance with DoD

guidance for inclusion of the century. 

Action: DLMSO must prepare a response to the LFWG.

(5) Date/Time in Beginning Segments. All DLMS

ICs include a date and time in the beginning segment (or other

location in table 1 when not available). The actual entry

represents the date and time of transaction creation. Since 

DAASC may open transaction sets to “rebundle” and route

transactions to different activities, it is necessary to overlay

the original entry with the DAASC creation date and time. 

Mr. Featherstone questioned this practice. He indicated that

this would destroy accountability and auditability.

Action: DLMSO will address Mr. Featherstone’s concerns.

(6) Concept of Operations. Mr. Featherstone

discussed the need for a concept of operations which would

clarify implementation issues such as conversion (must all ICs be

compatible with conversion?) and transaction flow (must all DLMS

transactions pass through DAASC?).

Action: The PRC will refer this to the Logistics Information

Board (LIB) Implementation Workgroup.

(7) DLMS Conversion Tables. The DLMS requires

use of tables to convert selected DoD codes into an ANSI

equivalent for transmission. This permits DoD systems to

continue supporting commonly understood values for unit of issue

and mode of shipment and communicate in an ANSI environment. The

conversion tables are found in the DLMS manual and (if requested

by DLMSO) on the National Institute of Standards and Technology

(NIST) database. Mr. Featherstone explained that there is a high 
9

cost associated with using the conversion tables. He suggested

that the Components evaluate adoption of the ANSI code values,

particularly for mode of shipment. As an alternative to using

the ANSI data element, DLMSO and Components should also

reconsider using a DoD code list under the LM/LQ segment.

(8) Outstanding AMCLs. The PRC reiterated the

need to address implementation issues for open AMCLs which were

originally scheduled for implementation in 1993 and later, but

were put on hold during the CIM single standard system effort. 

It was agreed that these open AMCLs should be reviewed and new

implementation dates established. DLMSO Co-Chairs are open to

this. However, with the current emphasis on completion of IC

review, there is only a limited amount of time available. 

Components are requested to review the open AMCLS and suggest

priorities. A list of the open MILSTRIP and MILSTRAP AMCLs is

attached at Enclosure 3. As a starting point for the open AMCL

review, DLMSO will schedule the following DoD Inspector General

and General Accounting Office Audit report related AMCL for

review at the July PRC meeting: Joint AMCLs 12 (MILSTRAP) and 43

(MILSTRIP), Maintaining Accountability During Maintenance

actions.

(9) DLMS Enhancements. The Committee requested

a list of enhancements approved by the MODELS Functional Work

Group for inclusion under DLMS. They questioned whether adequate

procedures for enhancements have been provided.

(10) Part Numbered Items. The Air Force will

research the requirement for mandatory identification of the

manufacturer (by CAGE Code) when reporting on part numbered

material.

(11) Locally Assigned Control Number . PRC members

suggested that there may be a requirement to pass a locally

assigned number to identify material on physical inventory

transactions. Reporting inventory of captured weapons would be

one potential application. 

Action: The Army will address this concern and prepare a change

proposal if appropriate. 
10

h. Future Supply PRC Meetings. The next PRC meeting

has been rescheduled for June 16-20, 1997. This meeting will

address discrepancy/deficiency reporting under DLMS. Additional

meetings are planned for July 14-18 and September 8-12, 1997. In

preparation for the July meeting, Components should review future

requirements for support from the Defense Program for

Redistribution of Assets (DEPRA). 

 /s/ 

ELLEN HILERT

Supply PRC Co-Chair

 

/s/

MARY JANE JOHNSON

Supply PRC Co-Chair

/s/

 

DON COLLINS 

DLMSO Action Officer

APPROVE: /s/ 

JAMES A. JOHNSON____________________

Director, DLMSO

Enclosures
1

1
2

2

Document Name: may_prc (PRC MOM)

may_prcc (cover letter forwarding MFR)

File: q: \work_in

Typed By: ESH

Action Officer/

 prepared by: Hilert

Date: May 12, 1997

Coordination: Admin _____________

Collins__________________ (sign)

Strong __________________

Carter __________________

MJ Johnson_______________ (sign)

Hilert __________________ (sign)

BCC: Hilert (3 copies)

MJ Johnson/Savage/Collins/

Pipan

 Carter
SUPPLY PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING

HOSTED BY THE

DEFENSE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS OFFICE (DLMSO)

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN ROAD ROOM 1655

FORT BELVOIR VA 22060-6221

 MAY MEETING AGENDA

CONFERENCE ROOM 1905 EXCEPT AS NOTED

MAY 5, 1997 BEGINNING 1300

1. WELCOME/OPENING REMARKS/INTRODUCTIONS ELLEN HILERT

MARY JANE JOHNSON

MELLA SAVÁGE

2 REVIEW ACTION ITEMS FROM MARCH MEETING ALL

3. PROPOSED DLMS CHANGE 10, FSCAP IN ISSUE, MELLA SAVÁGE

RELEASE, AND RECEIPT DOCUMENTS, STATUS

4. FORCE OR ACTIVITY DESIGNATOR (F/AD) REVIEW ELLEN HILERT

5. SERVICE/AGENCY INITIATIVES TO CAPTURE ELLEN HILERT

DESEX REQUISITIONS FOR DAASC HISTORY

UPDATE

MELLA SAVÁGE

TERRY TREPAL

MAY 6, 1997 BEGINNING 0815

*** TUESDAY MORNING SESSION ONLY HELD IN ROOM 1946 ***

6. PROPOSED DLMS CHANGE 6, MATERIAL RETURNS ELLEN HILERT

DISCREPANCIES, STATUS

7. AMCLS 11/15, MATERIAL RECEIPT DENNIS THOMAS

ACKNOWLEDGMENT, FINANCIAL INTERFACE

8. STANDARD WEAPON SYSTEMS CODE DEVELOPMENT TBD

MAY 7, 1997 BEGINNING 0815
9. TS 511 (LS50) REQUISITION MODIFICATION MELLA SAVÁGE

(REVIEW CHANGES)

10. TS 517 (LS18) MATERIAL OBLIGATION MELLA SAVÁGE

VALIDATION (REVIEW LFWG COMMENTS)

11. TS 517 (LS45) GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MELLA SAVÁGE

MATERIAL VALIDATION (REVIEW LFWG COMMENTS)

12. TS 856 (LS14) SHIPMENT STATUS (NEW FOR MELLA SAVÁGE

PRC/PASSED LFWG)

13. TS 846 (LS54) ASSET RECLASSIFICATION DON COLLINS

(REVIEW CHANGES)

MAY 8, 1997 BEGINNING 0815

14. TS 846 (LS55) PHYSICAL INVENTORY/ DON COLLINS

TRANSACTION HISTORY (NEW) 

15. TS 846 (LS58) LOCATION RECONCILIATION DON COLLINS

(NEW)

16. TS 947 (LS16) INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT (NEW) DON COLLINS

MAY 9, 1997 BEGINNING 0815

17. TS 846 (LS60) ASSET STATUS INQUIRY/REPORT MARY JANE JOHNSON

(NEW)

18. WRAP-UP, RECAP, AND FUTURE PLANNING ADMINISTRATORS
1 Enclosure 2

DEFENSE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (DLMS)

SUPPLY PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING

ATTENDANCE ROSTER

MAY 1997

CONFERENCE ROOM 1905

NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS

OFFICE

SYMBOL

VOICE DAYS IN ATTENDANCE

TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

DSN DSN

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5 6 7 8 9

Ellen Hilert DLMSO 427-6117 427-6162 ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

Co-Chair, Supply PRC (703)767-6117 (703)767-6162

Mary Jane Johnson DLMSO 427-6123 427-6162 maryjane_johnson@hq.dla.mil

Co-Chair, Supply PRC (703)767-6123 (703)767-6162

Mella Saváge DLMSO 427-6127 427-6162 vermella_savage@hq.dla.mil

DoD MILSTRIP System (703)767-6127 (703)767-6162

Administrator

Don Collins DLMSO 427-6122 427-6162 don_collins@hq.dla.mil

(703)767-6122 (703)767-6162

Al Henderson DLMSO 427-6114 427-6162 alray_henderson@hq.dla.mil

(703)767-6114 (703)767-6162

Jackie Carter DLMSO 427-6105 427-6162 jackie_carter@hq.dla.mil

(703)767-6105 (703)767-6162

Dennis Thomas DLMSO 427-6128 427-6162 dennis_thomas@hq.dla.mil

(703)767-6128 (703)767-6162

Charles Strong DLMSO 427-6154 427-6162 charles_strong@hq.dla.mil

(703)767-6154 (703)767-6162
NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS

OFFICE

SYMBOL

VOICE DAYS IN ATTENDANCE

TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

DSN DSN

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5 6 7 8 9

2

ARMY

John Milliken HQ AMC 767-8278 767-5094 jmilliken@hq.amc.army.mil

AMCLG-SM (703)617-8278 (703)617-5094

CW3 Sterling M. Hunt ATCL-SAL DSN: 687-2570 687-1198 hunts@lee-dsn1.army.mil

Combined (804) 734-257

Arms

Support

Command

Randy Stalsberg DALO-SMP (703)614-6750 (703)614-6753 stalsrl@hqda.army.mil

224-6750 224-6753

Sharon Dunfrund DA DCSLOG (703)614-6753 (703)697-9671 dunfrsa@hq.da.army.mil Not in attendance.

DALO-SMP 224-6753 227-9671

Vicki Laney LAISO 645-7167 laney-vm@redstone.army.mil

(205)955-7167 (205)955-8873

John Mays LAISO 645-7170 mays-jh@redstone.army.mil

(205)7170 (205)955-8873

Keith Mattison ATCOM 693-5297 693-5258 kmattiso@stl.army.mil

(314)263-5297 (314)263-5258

Linda Kil LOGSA (205)955-7218 (205)955-6931 lkil@logsa,army.mil Not in attendance.

AMXLS-MD 645-7218 645-6931

LTC John S. Smith HQ DA (703) 614-6459 smithjs@hqda.army.mil Not in attendance.

DCSLOG 224 -6459

Hector Guiot HQ DA (703) 614-6457 guiothf@hqda.army.mil Not in attendance.

DCSLOG 224-6457
NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS

OFFICE

SYMBOL

VOICE DAYS IN ATTENDANCE

TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

DSN DSN

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5 6 7 8 9

3

NAVY

Ross Burton (717)790-7016 (717)790-1479

NAVICPMECH 430-7016 430-1479 ross_burton@icpmech.navy.mil

Phil Fiskett NAVSUP 430-3436 430-7045 philip_fiskett@navsup.navy.mil

SUP-4113A (717)790-3436 (717)790-7045

Stan Spolowich NAVICP DSN 442-5117 DSN 442-0333 stanley_spolowich@icpphil.navy.mil Not in attendance.

P761 (215)697-0333

AIR FORCE

Bobbi Ziolek HQ AFMC/ 787-6335 986-1186 bziolek@wpgate1.wpafb.af.mil

LGIM (937)257-6335 (937)257-8904

Elise Gabbard USMC (703)696-1052 gabbarde@mqg-smtp3.usmc.mil Not in attendance.

Walt Wilsey AF/ILSP (703)697-5980 wilseyw@afsync.hq.af.mil Not in attendance.

Lt Col 227-5980

Pat Cronin HQ 225-2409 croninp@af.pentagon.mil

USAF/ILSP (703)695-2409 (703)614-7570

MARINE CORPS

Cynthia Chavis USMC 426-0907 426-2707 chavisc@mqg-smtp3.usmc.mil

LPS-1 (703)696-0907 (703)426-2707

Maj Andy Starr HQMC I&L starr@mqg.smpt3.usmc.mil

LPP-2 (703)696-1051 (703)696-1079

MGySgt Max Wix LPP-2 (703)696- (703)696-1079 wixm@mqg.smtp3.usmc.mil

I&L HQMC 1051/52

426-1051/52
NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS

OFFICE

SYMBOL

VOICE DAYS IN ATTENDANCE

TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

DSN DSN

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5 6 7 8 9

4

DLA

Bob Vitko HQ DLA 427-1601 427-2528 robert_vitko@hq.dla.mil

MMLSI (703)767-1601 (703)767-2528

Brenda K. Meadows HQ DLA 427-1606 427-2528 brenda_meadows@hq.dla.mil

MMLSI (703)767-1606 (703)767-2528

Mary Day DLA-MMLSI (703)767-2535 (703)767-2528 mary_day @hq.dla.mil

427-2535 427-2528

Linda Pavlik DLA-MMLSI (703)767-2536 (703)767-2528 linda_pavlik@hq.dla.mil

427-2536 427-2528

Margaret Gandy DLA-MMLR (703)767-1515 (703)767-1516 margaret_gandy@hq.dla.mil

427-1515 427-1516

OTHER

Marcia Crockett GSA FSS (703)305-7551 (703)305-7083 marcia.crockett@gsa.gov

FCSI

Dave Brown DAASC (937)656-3828 (937)656-3900 dbrown@daas.dla.mil

DBTCI 986-3828 986-3900

Terry Trepal OUSD (A&T) (703)697-4475 (703)697-9738 ttrepal@acq.osd.mil

L/MDM 227-4475

Joe Cook JLSC-MMA (513)255-6351 785-7606 cookj@jlsc.wpafb.af.mil

785-6351

Cathy Pastore FAA (202)267-9932 (202)267-5753 cpastoremail.hq.faa.gov

AFZ-500

Craig Lockard DFSC-DB (703)767-9664 clockard@dfsc.dla.mil Not in attendance.
NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS

OFFICE

SYMBOL

VOICE DAYS IN ATTENDANCE

TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

DSN DSN

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5 6 7 8 9

5

Sherry Larkin USCG slarkin@comdt.uscg.mil

G-SLP (202)267-2601 (202)267-4516

Harry Featherstone LMI (703)917-7210 (703)917-7518 hfeather@lmi.org
OUTSTANDING MILSTRAP AMCLs

AMCL IMPLEMENTATION

NUMBER SUBJECT DATE

ORIGINAL

3 Supply Condition Code W (Warranty) Nov 93

5 Date packed/expiration date for subsistence items Nov 93

7 Expanded CLPSC to differentiate between FMSO II and Nov 93

FMSO I (Joint with MILSTRIP

AMCL 22)

8A Revised procedures for physical inventory control Nov 94

9 Provides for DoD asset accountability for returns of GSA Nov 94

managed items which were not due-in

10 Provides for inter-Component use of Supply Condition Nov 94

Code Q as revised and assigns management codes to (Joint w/ MILSTRIP 34)

identify materiel for mutilation by DRMOs

12 Maintaining accountability during maintenance actions Nov 95

(Joint w/MILSTRIP 43)

13 Partial reversal of selected MILSTRAP transactions Nov 94

14 Revised asset status reporting and logistics asset support

estimate procedures in support of DoD TAV

49A Provides for automated followup and reconciliation of May 89

dues-in between the losing and gaining inventory

managers during logistics reassignments
OUTSTANDING MILSTRIP AMCLs

AMCL DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT

NUMBER OF CHANGE

ORIGINAL

IMPLEMENTATION

DATE

154 Modified FMS requisition and billing procedures. 1 Nov 93

6 Modified MRP reporting timeframes. 1 May 93

13 Identified date packed/expiration date for subsistence items. 1 Nov 93

22 Provided identification to differentiate between FMSO I and FMSO

II requisitions.

1 Nov 93

(Joint w/ MILSTRAP 7)

23A 1 Nov 93 Established new advice codes to indicate materiel with no less than

75% shelf life remaining can be shipped.

26 Established a single RI for excess reports transmitted to GSA. 1 Nov 93

29 1 May 94 Clarified the effective date, cutoff date and action to be taken on

mass cancellation request.

32 1 Nov 93 Required mandatory entry of controlled inventory item code and

shelf-life code on the DD Form 1348-1A on issues from stock.

34 Prescribed the use of management codes to identify materiel which

must be mutilated by DRMOs.

1 Nov 94

(Joint w/ MILSTRAP 10)

35 1 Nov 95 Required the ICP to use Reject Status Code SE when an FTM has

an invalid NSN.

36 1 Nov 95 Revised Status Code D8 to explain reason for rejection and process

for resubmission of FMS requisitions.

39 Established procedures for verifying excessive quantity requisitions. 1 Nov 94

40 1 May 94 Applied the MOV procedures to requisitions in pre-award

procurement status.

41 1 Nov 94 Authorized DAAS to reject International Logistics requisitions with

invalid ship-to and mail-to addresses in the MAPAD.

43 Used the MRP automatic returns procedures for reporting assets

shipped to repair facilities of another service.

1 Nov 95

(Joint w/ MILSTRAP 12)

44 1 Nov 95 Expanded the explanation of Demand Code “O” and revised the

format of the DI Code A4_ to identify the demand code.