alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 305 

To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. JONES, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

LATTA, Mr. LONG, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. 

NORMAN, Mr. OLSON, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. ALLEN, and Mr. AUSTIN

SCOTT of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with 

fertilization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sanctity of Human 

5 Life Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DECLARATION. 

7 In the exercise of the powers of the Congress, includ8 ing Congress’ power under article I, section 8 of the Con9 stitution, to make necessary and proper laws, and ConVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:21 Jan 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H305.IH H305

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 305 IH

1 gress’ power under section 5 of the 14th article of amend2 ment to the Constitution of the United States— 

3 (1) the Congress declares that— 

4 (A) the right to life guaranteed by the 

5 Constitution is vested in each human being, and 

6 is the paramount and most fundamental right 

7 of a person; and 

8 (B) the life of each human being begins 

9 with fertilization, cloning, or its functional 

10 equivalent, irrespective of sex, health, function 

11 or disability, defect, stage of biological develop12 ment, or condition of dependency, at which time 

13 every human being shall have all the legal and 

14 constitutional attributes and privileges of 

15 personhood; and 

16 (2) the Congress affirms that the Congress, 

17 each State, the District of Columbia, and all United 

18 States territories have the authority to protect the 

19 lives of all human beings residing in its respective 

20 jurisdictions. 

21 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

22 For purposes of this Act: 

23 (1) FERTILIZATION.—The term ‘‘fertilization’’ 

24 means the process of a human spermatozoan pene25 trating the cell membrane of a human oocyte to creVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:21 Jan 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H305.IH H305

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 305 IH

1 ate a human zygote, a one-celled human embryo, 

2 which is a new unique human being. 

3 (2) CLONING.—The term ‘‘cloning’’ means the 

4 process called somatic cell nuclear transfer, that 

5 combines an enucleated egg and the nucleus of a so6 matic cell to make a human embryo. 

7 (3) HUMAN; HUMAN BEING.—The terms 

8 ‘‘human’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include each and 

9 every member of the species homo sapiens at all 

10 stages of life, beginning with the earliest stage of de11 velopment, created by the process of fertilization, 

12 cloning, or its functional equivalent. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-9070.

#### Maurice A. Proctor, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 828, 132 S. Ct. 122,

181 L. Ed. 2d 45,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5604.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 2 A.3d 1093.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
F. Adair, as Chief Financial Officer of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2008



By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Emerson  Radio  Corp.  (Form  S-8  No.   333-63515)   pertaining  to  the  Stock
Compensation  Program and 1994  Non-Employee  Director Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated June 28, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedules of Emerson  Radio Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2002,  filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




New York, New York
July 15, 2002
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        12
        
        13
        
        14
        
        15
        
        16 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2877 

AN ACT 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2877 EH

1 SECTION 1. E–3 VISAS FOR IRISH NATIONALS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) of the 

3 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

4 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or, on a 

5 basis of reciprocity as determined by the Secretary of 

6 State, a national of Ireland,’’ after ‘‘Australia’’. 

7 (b) EMPLOYER REQUIREMENTS.—Section 212 of the 

8 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (t) 

11 (as added by section 1(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 108– 

12 449 (118 Stat. 3470)) as subsection (u); and 

13 (2) by adding at the end of subsection (t)(1) 

14 (as added by section 402(b)(2) of Public Law 108– 

15 77 (117 Stat. 941)) the following: 

16 ‘‘(E) In the case of an attestation filed with re17 spect to a national of Ireland described in section 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii), the employer is, and will remain 

19 during the period of authorized employment of such 

20 Irish national, a participant in good standing in the 

21 E-Verify program described in section 403(a) of the 

22 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Respon23 sibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).’’. 

24 (c) APPLICATION ALLOCATION.—Paragraph (11) of 

25 section 214(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

26 U.S.C. 1184(g)(11)) is amended to read as follows: 
3 

•HR 2877 EH

1 ‘‘(11)(A) The Secretary of State may approve 

2 initial applications submitted for aliens described in 

3 section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) only as follows: 

4 ‘‘(i) For applicants who are nationals of 

5 the Commonwealth of Australia, not more than 

6 10,500 for a fiscal year. 

7 ‘‘(ii) For applicants who are nationals of 

8 Ireland, not more than a number equal to the 

9 difference between 10,500 and the number of 

10 applications approved in the prior fiscal year 

11 for aliens who are nationals of the Common12 wealth of Australia. 

13 ‘‘(B) The approval of an application described 

14 under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be deemed for nu15 merical control purposes to have occurred on Sep16 tember 30 of the prior fiscal year. 

17 ‘‘(C) The numerical limitation under subpara18 graph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens and 

19 not to the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2877 

AN ACT 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa 

program.
No. 10-10339.

#### Robert Toellner, Petitioner v. Daniel Martuscello, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 834, 132 S. Ct. 136,

181 L. Ed. 2d 56,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5344.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Personnel Accountability SITREP Instructions 

HQs and DLA FAs Personnel Accountability representatives will complete each 

category of the Personnel Accountability SITREP form as follows: 

Type in activity name (i.e. J3/4, DESC), date, time of report, and type of report 

submitted (i.e. initial, interim, or final). 

Complete Number of Personnel Assigned: 

Number of Active Military Assigned: Column C 

Number of Reserve Military Assigned: Column D 

Number of Civilians Assigned: Column E 

Number of Contractors (OCONUS only): Column F 

Each entry will automatically total in column B. 

Complete Number of Personnel Accounted for: 

Number of Active Military Accounted for Column H 

Number of Reserve Military Accounted for Column I 

Number of Civilians Accounted for Column J 

Number of Contractors Accounted for (OCONUS only) Column K 

Each entry will automatically total in column G. 

Complete Status of Personnel: 

Total number of Personnel Unaccounted For: Column L 

Number of Present/Available for Duty: Column M 

Number on Leave: Column N 

Number on TDY/TAD: Column O 

Number at Safe Haven: Column P 

Number at hospital/injured: Column Q 

Each entry will automatically total in column R, except for column L. Column L 

requires a manual input along with the name, rank/grade, HQs/Field Activity, and 

the reason the member is unaccounted for in the remarks section of the SITREP. 

Checksum: column R Status of personnel should equal 0, unless a person is 

unaccounted for. If not, check your entries.
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rule 407

407-1

RULE 407 NUISANCES

(Adopted prior to 2/21/72; Revised 4/27/76; 9/14/99)

No Person shall discharge from any Source whatsoever such quantities of Air 

Contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to 

any considerable number of persons or to the public or which endanger the comfort, 

repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public or which cause or have a 

natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property.

This Rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for 

the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.
**LOGISTICS RESPONSE TIMES (LRT)**

# LRT FILE

NOTES:  	If blank, Text fields will have spaces (hex ‘40’).

	If not populated, Date fields will have a default date (‘0001-01-01’).

Physical record length is 700.

www.dla.mil/j-6/dlmso/eLibrary/Documents/PMPRC/Record_Layout.docx

	1 of 1

Last Updated 04/04/2014

https://www.dla.mil/Portals/104/Documents/DLMS/Committees/PMPRC/Record_Layout.docx		 

Last Updated 11/05/2019

		3 of 12
No. 10-11063.

#### Jeremy Pinson, Petitioner v. E. J. Chipi, et al.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 209,

181 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6847.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-7877.

#### Lorenzo J. Nichols, Petitioner v. Brian Coleman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

562 U.S. 1205, 131 S. Ct. 1054,

178 L. Ed. 2d 873,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 935.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-10633.

#### Carvin Rudolph, Petitioner v. Michigan.

565 U.S. 842, 132 S. Ct. 155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 70,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6234.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
# C_2013207EN.01004701.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/47

---

Action brought on 21 May 2013 — Max Mara Fashion Group/OHIM — Mackays Stores (M&Co.)

(Case T-272/13)

2013/C 207/78

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Max Mara Fashion Group Srl (Torino, Italy) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mackays Stores Ltd (Renfrew, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 7 March 2013 in Case R 1199/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 7 March 2013 in Case R 1199/2012-2;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘M&Co.’ for goods and services in classes 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 128 679

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative marks containing the word element ‘MAX&Co.’ for goods and services in classes 18, 24, 25, 35, 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7027.

#### Ted A. McCracken, Petitioner v. Brookhaven Science Associates LLC, et al.

562 U.S. 1144, 131 S. Ct. 914,

178 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 462.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 138.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 30 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that nonnative 

species in the United States shall not be treated as endangered species 

or threatened species for purposes of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide 

that nonnative species in the United States shall not 

be treated as endangered species or threatened species 

for purposes of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving America’s En5 dangered Species Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVES Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 30 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON TREATMENT OF NONNATIVE SPE2 CIES IN THE UNITED STATES AS ENDAN3 GERED SPECIES OR THREATENED SPECIES. 

4 (a) LIMITATION.—Section 13 of the Endangered Spe5 cies Act of 1973 (relating to amendments to other laws, 

6 which have executed) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘LIMITATION ON TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIES AS

8 ENDANGERED SPECIES OR THREATENED SPECIES

9 ‘‘SEC. 13. (a) LIMITATION.—The species described in 

10 subsection (b) shall not be treated as endangered species 

11 or threatened species for purposes of this Act. 

12 ‘‘(b) COVERED SPECIES.—The species referred to in 

13 subsection (a) are species in the United States that are 

14 not native to the United States.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con16 tents in the first section of such Act is amended by strik17 ing the item relating to section 13 and inserting the fol18 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 13. Limitation on treatment of certain species as endangered species or 

threatened species.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5234.

#### Omar Sharrieff Gay, Petitioner v. Mike Evans, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 896, 132 S. Ct. 285,

181 L. Ed. 2d 171,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5645.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 723.
No. 10-1443.

#### AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Marlene A. Penrod.

565 U.S. 822, 132 S. Ct. 108,

181 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6605.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 1158.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-293-000]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc. (Williams), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with the 
proposed effective date of August 1, 1998:

Second Revised Sheet No. 6
Third Revised Sheet No. 6A

    Williams states that this filing is being made pursuant to Article 
14 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1. Williams hereby submits its third quarter, 1998, report 
of GSR costs.
    Williams states that a copy of its filing was served on all of 
Williams' jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18382 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M