alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

6041 Spurlock 1

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A

Test End Time

Chlorine Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting Information

Fuel #4
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18749]



[[Page 38139]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-106031-98]
RIN 1545-AW13


Trading Safe Harbors; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of 
public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to REG-106031-98, which was 
published in the Federal Register on Friday, June 12, 1998 (63 FR 
32164), relating to the treatment of foreign taxpayers trading in 
derivative financial instruments for their own account.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Milton Cahn, (202) 622-3870 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of this 
correction is under section 864(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, REG-106031-98 contains errors which may prove to be 
misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
(REG-106031-98), which is the subject of FR Doc. 98-15452, is corrected 
as follows:
    1. On page 32164, column 3, in the preamble under the paragraph 
heading ``Background'', the second paragraph, line 3, the language 
``promulgated in 1972. Since the'' is corrected to read ``promulgated 
in 1968. Since the''.
    2. On page 32165, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph 
heading ``2. Eligible Nondealer'', the third paragraph, line 9, the 
language ``securities in 475(c)(1)(B), including'' is corrected to read 
``securities in section 475(c)(1)(B), including''.


Sec. 1.864(b)-1  [Corrected]

    3. On page 32166, columns 2 and 3, Sec. 1.864(b)-1(b)(1) 
introductory text, the last line in column 2 and the first line in 
column 3, the language ``nondealer is a person that is not a resident 
of the United States and is not,'' is corrected to read ``nondealer is 
a foreign corporation or a person that is not a resident of the United 
States, and either of which is not,''.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 98-18749 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 309 

To prohibit drilling in the Arctic Ocean. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Mr. CARBAJAL, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. KEATING, 

Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. SOTO, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. WELCH, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. PINGREE, 

Mr. MCEACHIN, and Ms. BONAMICI) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit drilling in the Arctic Ocean. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Arctic Ocean 

5 Drilling Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 309 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN ARCTIC 

2 OCEAN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 

3 SHELF. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 ARCTIC PLANNING AREA OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL

9 SHELF.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act 

10 or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not 

11 issue or renew a lease or any other authorization for the 

12 exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, 

13 or any other mineral in the Arctic Ocean, including the 

14 Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea Planning Areas.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3925-3926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1898]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Justice
[OJP(NIJ)-1153]


National Institute of Justice Solicitation for Drug Court 
Evaluation II

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Office of Justice 
Programs.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement of the availability of the National Institute of 
Justice ``Solicitation for Drug Court Evaluation II.''

DATES: The deadline for applications is close of business March 13, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, 810 Seventh Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about 
application procedures for solicitations, please call the U.S. 
Department of Justice Response Center 1-800-421-6771.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Secs. 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721-23 
(1994).

Background

    NIJ is soliciting proposals to evaluate 16 drug court sites, which 
are administered by the Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Program 
Office (DCPO). The evaluation will take place in two separate phases. A 
single initial grant of up to $500,000 will be awarded for a 12-24 
month period. A second

[[Page 3926]]

supplemental grant will be awarded for the second phase of the 
research, ranging from 12-24 months, the award amount dependent on the 
work required.
    The first phase of research will include: a conceptual description 
of the 16 DCPO drug court sites; development of comprehensive 
descriptive, historical, and attitudinal data about drug court 
programs; and measurement of the data available for program evaluation. 
As part of phase one researchers will develop a viable strategy for 
evaluating program impact and success that will serve as a proposal for 
the supplemental grant to be awarded for phase two of the research.
    Phase two of the research will assess the success of the drug 
courts at meeting their goals, including: desistance from criminal 
behavior and drug use, retention in treatment, and changes in life 
circumstances and productivity.
    Interested organizations should call the National Criminal Justice 
Reference Service (NCJRS) at 1-800-851-3420 to obtain a copy of 
``Solicitation for Drug Court Evaluation II, 1998'' (refer to document 
no. SL000241). The solicitation is available electronically via the 
World Wide Web, connect to the National Institute of Justice homepage 
at http://ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/funding.htm.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 98-1898 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
# C_2015236EN.01001501.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles (Belgium)) — Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM)

(Case C-65/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 92/85/EEC - Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding - Article 11(2) and (4) - Established public servant assigned non-active status for personal reasons in order to work as a salaried employee - Refusal to grant her a maternity allowance on the ground that she has not completed, as a salaried employee, the minimum contribution period required in order to be eligible to receive certain social benefits))

(2015/C 236/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Nivelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Charlotte Rosselle

Applicant:

Defendants: Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM)

Defendants:

Intervening party: Institut pour l’égalité des femmes et des hommes (IEFH)

Intervening party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 11(4) of Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from granting a worker a maternity allowance on the ground that, as an established public servant having obtained non-active status for personal reasons in order to work as a salaried employee, she has not completed, in the context of her work as a salaried employee, the minimum contribution period required under national law in order to be eligible to receive that maternity allowance, even if she has worked for over 12 months immediately prior to the presumed date of confinement.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Notice of Availability for the Record of Decision for the San 
Gabriel Canyon Sediment Management Plan, Los Angeles County, California

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, in 
coordination with the County of Los Angeles--Department of Public 
Works, has completed the Record of Decision associated with the Joint 
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the San 
Gabriel Canyon Sediment Management Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the Record of Decision or requests for the document 
may be directed to Mr. Aaron Allen, Project Manager, Regulatory Branch, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, California, 
90053-2325, (213) 452-3413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Robert L. Davis,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 98-1830 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
#### *State, Respondent, v. Otton, Petitioner,*

No. 91669-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45296-1-II, April 14, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1001. *Granted*November 5, 2015.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 7, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH S. ORD                                                                            
|                 |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
### Reference Key Air LLC ExemptionIRulcmaking FAA-20l1-033? Danny Olmstead
to: 

## Chris Monteleon 06 / 22/ 2011 02:50 PM Cc : Knul Finne volde n Sho w Details



### History: This message has been rep li ed to. Chris, 

### 6 / 29 / 2011 10:22:5 3 AM

Key Air would like to amend FAA Docket ID FAA-2011-0337 to include an exemption from FAR 135.225 (f) (2) , lower than standard landing minimums. Key Air prop o ses to conduct IFR approaches at military and foreign airports when visibility is less than one half mile. K ey Ai r i s auth o rized to use lower than standard approach minima at U.S. Civil Airports in accordance with the limitations and p rov isi o ns of Operations Specification paragraph COS2. Further, this proposal requests identical privileges at military and forei g n a i r po rts as those described in the provisions of our current Operations Specification paragraph (052. Key Air will comply with the applicable instrument approach procedures and weather minimums prescribed by the authority having j urisdiction over foreign and military airports. This petition applies to all aircraft Key Air has list ed on the certificate s 0 08 5 

### Ai rcraft Li s ting Operational Specificati o n
. In support of this proposal, Key Air respectfully submits the following comments: 1. All Key Air crewmembers are trained and evaluated in F AA-approved level C and 0 simulators under an FAA
approved 14 (FR Part 135 training program. The lower than Standard Approach Minimums training event is included in all Initial, Upgrade and Recurrent Curriculum Segments. The simulator training and evaluation is done using low visibility conditions appropriate to the minimums authorized in the Ops Specs C052 (c) 

### (I). Key Air training meets all the regulatory requirements and follows the applicable 8900.1 guidance for both FAR part 121 and 135 training programs. 2. Key Air is currently authorized to conduct inst r ument approaches at U.S. Civil Airports in weather below**~** mile visibility minimums for 14 CFR 135 aircraft operations through Operations Specification (052 Paragraph (c) (1)

. Therefore, the FAA has already recognized that Key Air can safely and effectively conduct said operations. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the number listed below. Danny Olmstead Vice President of Flight Ope rations Waterbury-Orlord Airpo rt 3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201 Oxford, CT 06478 (S8S) KEY·AIR·! toll free (203) 264·0605 phone (203) 5 7 5·4420 direct (203)264-3029 fax w ww.KeyAi r.com 

### Page 1 of2

# '.$**~** IR 

# @ Key A;" Celebrat;ng 25 Ye"s of SeIV;ce CONFIDENTIALITY NonCE 

### 6 / 29 / 2011 

### 10:22:53 AM

This electronic mail**tr~r'lsmissjor'l** is**confiderlti~l.** may be privileged and should be read or retained only by t he intended recipient. If you have received**thi~ tran** **smi~sion** In error,**ple~~e** immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.



### Page 2 of2
No. 10-1496.

#### John S. Karls, Petitioner v. The Bank of New York, et al.

565 U.S. 824, 132 S. Ct. 114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 39,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5866.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
January 14, 2009
 
 
 __________________________
 Richard
A. Pomije
 CEO
  23
 Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
January 14, 2009
 
 
 __________________________
 John A.
Witham
 CFO
  24
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00683-CV

David Disraeli, Appellant

v.

Crenshaw Athletic Club, Inc., Appellee

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1

NO. C-1-CV-06-006547, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

David Disraeli appeals a final judgment that was signed on August 17, 2007. Disraeli

filed a timely motion for new trial. Because a timely motion for new trial was filed, the notice of

appeal was due by November 15, 2007, 90 days from the date the judgment was signed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 26.1(a)(1). However, notice of appeal in this case was not filed until December 4, 2007.

Disraeli simultaneously filed a motion for extension of time in which to file his notice of appeal.

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, both the notice of appeal and the motion for extension of time are

due to be filed within fifteen days of the original deadline for filing the notice of appeal. In the

present case, the motion for extension of time and the notice of appeal were filed outside of the

additional fifteen-day limit. As a result, the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, the

motion for extension of time is overruled, and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
2

____________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 15, 2008
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18696]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

agency: United States Information Agency.

subject: Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations.

summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 
(43 F.R. 13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 
27, 1985 (50 F.R. 27393, July 2, 1985).

action: I hereby determine that the objects on the list specified 
below, to be included in the exhibit, ``Buddhist Treasures from Nara,'' 
imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects 
at the Cleveland Museum of Art, in Cleveland, Ohio, from on or about 
August 9, 1998, to on or about September 27, 1998, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

for further information contact: Carol Epstein, Assistant General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, 202/619-6981, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-18696 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
```
No. 10-10297.

#### Jesus Torres Roman, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 833, 132 S. Ct. 134,

181 L. Ed. 2d 54,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5795.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, denied.

Same case below, 40 So. 3d 876.