AFS

- 14

- 4 74

- E Exemption No. 13537

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591

In the matter of the petition of

AVI ATION INSTITUTE OF Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0673

MAINTENANCE for an exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

PAR TIAL GRANT OF EXEMPTION

By letter dated July 24, 2014, Mr. David L. Jones, Corporate Aviation Education Director, and on August 26, 2014, Mr. Gerald Yagen, President (AIM, or Petitioner), 4455 South Boulevard, Virginia Beach, VA 23452

, petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of AIM for an exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would allow students enrolled in AIM’s part 147 aviation maintenance techn ician school (AMT S) in Oakland

, CA , operating under Air Agency Certificate 2AQT602K , to take the Aviation Mechanic General (AMG), Aviation Mechanic Airframe (AMA), and Aviation Mechanic Powerplant (AMP) written tests after completing the corresponding port ion of the curriculum, but prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77. We grant in part and deny in part. Specifically, we grant AIM an exemption with respect to the AMG written test but deny the exemption with respect to the AMA and AMP written tests.

The petitioner requests relief from the following regulation :

Section 65.75(a) requires, in pertinent part, that “ [ e ] ach applicant for a mechanic certificate or rating must, after meeting the applicable experience requirements of § 65.7 7 , pass a written test covering the construction and maintenance of aircraft appropriate to the rating he seeks, the regulations in [subpart D (Mechanics),] and the applicable provisions of parts 43 and 91.” (Emphasis added.)2

The petitioner supports its request with the following information:

The p etitioner stated that the public interest would be served by allowing an aviation maintenance technician student to take each FAA written test immediately following his or her completion of the related course ma terial. The p etitioner stated that student learning would be enhanced and reinforced by the immediate feedback provided by the testing experience, and that this immediate feedback, coupled with a sense of accomplishment, would encourage students to contin ue their studies and reduce dropout rates.

The p etitioner stated that it currently has an established procedure for identifying and reporting any graduate eligible to take FAA

- mandated written, oral, and practical tests to

p etitioner’s own on

- site writte n test center and the Oakland Flight Standards District Office. The p etitioner proposed to use the same procedure to identify and report students who would qualify to take the written AMA or AMP tests. The p etitioner also proposed to withhold each

student ’s individual graduation certificate or certificate of completion until after the student successfully completed the entirety of the program in which the student enrolled (i.e., AMA or AMP). The p etitioner stated that its petition did not differ materiall y from others on record, and noted that the FAA had found those similar requests in the public interest.

Although AIM is correct that its initial petition for exemption does not differ materially from others on record, and that the FAA has previously gra nted exemptions to § 65.75, the FAA recently learned that these exemptions could inadvertently enable an individual to obtain his or her AMA or AMP certificate without satisfying the mechanic certificate eligibility requirements of § 65.77. 1 In light of t his reevaluation, the FAA has undertaken to revise and make consistent its exemptions to 65.75(a).

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for waiving the requirement for Federal Register publication because the exemption, if granted, would not se t a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be de trimental to AIM

.

The FAA's analysis is as follows:

The FAA’s reevaluation of § 65.75(a) exemptions

, stemmed from our discovery of a loophole that could potentially have allowed students to totally circumvent our experience requirements. Students must, among other things, take written, oral, and practical tests to

obtain a mechanic certificate. Section 65.80 allows an AMTS, under some circumstances, to administer a student’s required ora l and practical tests before the student satisfies the experience requirements of § 65.77. Under § 65.75(a), however, all students must satisfy § 65.77 before taking any written tests. By granting AIM’s request to allow students to take

the AMA and AMP w ritten tests before completing the experience requirements in § 65.77, we could inadvertently enable those students to totally circumvent our experience

1 Section 65.77 requires each applicant for a mechanic certificate or rating to present evidence of at least 18

mont hs, and in some cases at least 30 months, of practical experience.3

requirements, because a student could obtain a copy of his or her academic record indicating

that the s tudent has passed the AMA or AMP examinations, and provide that record to another school without disclosing that the student never satisfied the appropriate experience requirements.

Perhaps to mitigate this very concern, AIM also proposed to withhold a graduation certificate or certificate of completion until after the successful completion of the entire program in which the student was enrolled. Unfortunately, the proposed mitigation would not work because it would violate § 147.35(a), which requires e ach AMTS to “provide a transcript of the student’s grades to each student who is graduated from that school or who leaves it before being graduated.

. . . The transcript must state the curriculum in which the student was enrolled, whether the student sati sfactorily completed the curriculum, and the final grades the student received.” (Emphasis added.) This regulation prohibits AIM from withholding a student’s certificate until graduation if the student left without graduating. Moreover, the presence of grades on a transcript could erroneously suggest that a student both completed the

AMA or AMP examinations and satisfied the § 65.77 experience requirements. The FAA has, therefore, taken action to amend all such exemptions by issuing a Partial Grant of Ex emption

to all affected AMTSs.

The FAA does not have the same concerns regarding students who take the AMG examination before satisfying § 65.77. A student who successfully completes the AMG exam is not eligible to receive a mechanic certificate until af ter the student also completes the AMP or AMA exams. There is, therefore, no risk that a student who completes the AMG exam prior to satisfying the § 65.77 experience requirements will circumvent our regulations.

In addition, certain conditions and limit ations included in this partial grant are necessary to ensure an equivalent level of safety with § 65.75(a). The conditions

— requiring AIM to develop written testing procedures, include those procedures in its approved operating document or manual, and obt ain of those procedures from its Certificate Holding District

Office

— ensure that AIM’s educational program and curricula continue to meet FAA regulatory standards. The other condition of this exemption requires that, before AIM may retest any student who has failed the AMG test and who also does not meet the experience requirements of § 65.77, AIM must retrain the student on the entire instructional unit associated with the failed test and authorize the student to retake the test. To be clear, any

student who is eligible to take the AMG test on the basis of his or her own experience, who does not need to rely on this exemption, may retrain according to § 65.19

— including with any appropriately certificated airman. However, this exemption also creates a pop ulation of students who do not satisfy the § 65.77 experience requirements, and who are eligible to retake the AMG test only because of AIM’s exemption. To maintain an equivalent level of safety, this exemption requires AIM to retrain these students itsel f, using FAA

- approved curricula and in accordance with the FAA’s AMTS standards, including the quality of instruction standards codified in § 147.38a.4

The FAA’s Decision

For the reasons described above, the FAA continues to withdraw or amend all previou sly granted exemptions to § 65.75(a), which enabled an AMTS to administer the AMG, AMA, and AMP written tests immediately following a student’s successful completion of the corresponding curricula. The FAA’s new or revised exemptions to § 65.75(a) will al low an AMTS to administer the AMG examination immediately after students complete the corresponding curriculum and prior to satisfying the experience requirements of § 65.77, but

not allow AMTS to administer the AMA or AMP examinations before students sat isfy § 65.77.

In consideration of the foregoing, we find in the present case that a partial grant of exemption is in the public interest. We therefore issue this partial grant of exemption, which allows AIM

students to take the AMG examination immediat ely after completing the corresponding curriculum, but does not allow students to take the AMA or AMP examinations before completing the corresponding curricula.

Pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, AIM is grante d an exemption from § 65.75(a) to the extent necessary to allow AIM Oakland

, CA , operating under Air Agency Certificate 2AQT602K , to administer the AMG written test to any student immediately following his or her successful completion of the general curric ulum, and before meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77, subject to the conditions and

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. AIM must develop written procedures for administering the AMG written test to AIM

students immediate ly following successful completion of the general curriculum.

2. AIM must ensure these procedures are available for use in AIM’s approved operating or curriculum procedures document or manual.

3. Before retesting any student who has failed the AMG examination and also does not meet the experience requirements of § 65.77, AIM must retrain the student on the

entire instructional unit associated with the failed test and authorize the student to retake the test. AIM must have procedures for documenting and tracki ng compliance with all retesting procedures.

4. Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, AIM must provide the revised procedures to its Certificate Holding District Office for review and approval.

AIM’s request for an exemption from § 65.75(a), t o enable AIM to administer the AMA and the AMP written tests to a student after that student has completed the corresponding portion(s) of the curriculum, but prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77, is denied.5

This exemption termin ates on November 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Issu e d in Washington, D.C., on November 3 , 2015

.

/s/ John Barbagallo

De puty Director, F light Standards Service

.