alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-295-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filing of Tariff 
Sheets

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 102B
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 135

    FGT Asserts that the instant filing is in compliance with the 
Commission's Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998, in Docket No. RM96-
1-007 (Order No. 587-G). FGT also states that it is filing the tariff 
sheets to become effective on August 1, 1998.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18345 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3005 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

13308 Midland Road in Poway, California, as the ‘‘Ray Chavez Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. VARGAS, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Mr. LEVIN of California) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 13308 Midland Road in Poway, California, 

as the ‘‘Ray Chavez Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAY CHAVEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 13308 Midland Road in Poway, 

6 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ray 

7 Chavez Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3005 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ray Chavez Post Of3 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.22-1 APPENDIX 8.22

AP8.22. APPENDIX 8.22

DOCUMENT MODIFIER

(INVENTORY CONTROL POINT TO PROCUREMENT)

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC AMF (to change the SUPADD 

field) or DIC AMP (to change the required 

delivery date (RDD) field to 555).

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter the code of the activity to which the 

document is to be transmitted.

Media and Status 7 Enter the M&S code as shown in the 

original requisition.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter data as shown in the procurement 

instrument or procurement request.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter the unit of issue.

Quantity 25-29 a. Enter the quantity.

b. For ammunition and ammunition related 

items only (items in Federal supply group 

(FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 1427, 

1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 8140), enter an 

M in rp 29 to express in thousands any 

quantity exceeding 99,999. Example:

Express a quantity of 1,950,000 as 1950M 

(1950 in rp 25-28 and an M in rp 29).

Document Number 30-43 Enter the requisition document number as 

shown in the procurement request.

Suffix 44 Enter the suffix code as shown in the 

procurement request; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Supplementary Address 45-50 Enter the SUPADD in the DIC AMF; 

otherwise, leave blank in the DIC AMP.

Procurement Instrument 

Identifier (PIID) or 

Procurement Request 

Number

51-69 Enter the PIID when available, otherwise 

enter the PRN. Enter the PIID call/order 

number (F in 9th position) if applicable.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.22-2 APPENDIX 8.22

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Procurement Instrument 

Identifier (PIID) 

(51-63) Enter the PIID.1 Enter the PIID call/order 

number (F in 9th position) if applicable.

Contract Line Item Number (64-67) Enter the CLIN.

Contract Subline Number (68-69) Enter the contract subline item number, if 

applicable.

Procurement Request (51-64) Enter the PRN.

Blank (65-69) Leave blank when a PRN is entered.

Project (70-72) Enter the project code as shown in the 

original requisition.

Priority (73-74) Enter the priority designator as shown in the 

original requisition.

Procurement Document 

Indicator

75-76 Enter PR in rp 75-76 when the entry in rp 

51-64 is a PRN; otherwise, leave blank.

Signal2 77 Enter the signal code in the DIC AMF; 

otherwise, leave blank in DIC AMP.

Routing Identifier Code 78-80 Enter RIC to identify the activity preparing 

the transaction.

1 Use the legacy PIIN pending transition to the PIID. Refer to ADC 1161A. 2Revised requisition modifier procedures last reported as not implemented by USMC. Refer to AMCL 

123C.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3062 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare exception 

to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2019 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. VELA, 

Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. MARSHALL, 

Mr. BABIN, Mr. WALKER, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. PERRY, and Mr. COLE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the 

Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Access to 

5 Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3062 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS 

2 LIMITING MEDICARE EXCEPTION TO THE 

3 PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN RE4 FERRALS FOR HOSPITALS. 

5 Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection 

6 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 

7 684, 1005) and section 1106 of the Health Care and Edu8 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152; 

9 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law 

10 amended by such sections are restored as if such sections 

11 had never been enacted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-1531.

#### Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., Petitioner v. Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp., et al.

565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5379.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 17.
# C_2015294EN.01001601.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2015 — Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission

(Case C-360/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Approximation of laws - Directive 2009/48/EC - Toy safety - Limit values for lead, barium, arsenic, antimony, mercury and nitrosamines and nitrosatable substances in toys - Commission decision not to approve in full the national provisions notified by the German authorities maintaining the limit values for those substances - Proof of a higher level of protection for human health offered by the national provisions))

(2015/C 294/20)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and A. Lippstreu, acting as Agents, and by U. Karpenstein, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Mihaylova, M. Patakia and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 4.3


 







Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated June 24, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-195820) of Smart Trust,
Dynamic Sector Income Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


June 24, 2014
Opinion issued July 11, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 169
- CV

——————————— TARANTINO PROPERTIES, INC. , Appellant

V. SAMUEL BONILLA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017
- 71801

MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 6, 2023, appellant, Tarantino Properties, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 7, 2022 final judgment in favor of appellee, Samuel B onilla. On June 27, 2023, t he parties, representing that they had “settled2

the case , ” filed a “Joint Motion to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment, Release Supersedeas Bond, and Dismiss Appeal.” In their motion, the parties stated that they ha d reached an agreement in which appellee “agreed to release all claims against” appellant, and therefore “jo intly request[ed] that this Court dismiss this appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court with instructions to release [appellant] and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on Dece mber 27, 2022

. ” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1( a)(2 ) (A) , (B)

. The parties’ motion further stated that “[c]osts on appeal should be taxed against the party who incurred the same

. ”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
T E X
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(2), (c). Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion , dismiss the appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits , and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement, including the release of appellant and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on December 27, 2022

. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 42.1(a) (2)(B), 43.2(e)

. We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the party incurring the same. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 42.1

. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0458 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD COLEN BRYANT ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2023

12/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0458
No. 10-11109.

#### Nathan Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 215,

181 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7135.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 911.
No. 10-11082.

#### Edward Roy Newsome, aka Edward R. Newsome, Petitioner v. NFN Uy, et al.

565 U.S. 866, 132 S. Ct. 211,

181 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6410.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Dated: June 23, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Steven A. DavisSteven A. DavisChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-10354.

#### Darnell M. Smith, Petitioner v. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

565 U.S. 834, 132 S. Ct. 137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 57,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5567.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065801
<NAME>                        DERMATOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         37,401
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               37,401
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,123
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       200
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,401
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
J. Per Brodin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Claires Stores, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|             |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|             |  |  |  | 
|             |  |  | 
|May 22, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ J. Per Brodin      
|             |  |  |  |  |  | J. Per Brodin          
|             |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

1

DIC FJR/FJS FORMAT

REPLY TO REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF FUEL 

BILLING AND

REPLY TO FOLLOW-UP ON REQUEST FOR 

ADJUSTMENT OF FUEL BILLING

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DI Code 1-3 Enter

FJR to reply to initial or cancellation request.

FJS to reply to follow-up request.

RI Code 4-6 Perpetuate from the request (DI codes FJE, 

FJF).

Recipient of Billing 

Status Code

7 Perpetuate from the request.

Stock Number 8-20 Perpetuate from the request.

Blank 21-22 Leave blank.

Quantity 23-39 Perpetuate from the request.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from the request.

Suffix Code 44 Perpetuate from the request.

Supplementary 45-50 Perpetuate from the request.

Signal Code 51 Perpetuate from the request.

Fund Code 52-53 Perpetuate from the request.

Bill Number 54-58 For billing status codes AI and DD, enter the 

bill number under which the adjustment or 

bill was processed.

Otherwise, perpetuate from the request. 

Billing Status Code 59-61 Enter:

 59 Blank or character significant to the 

billing office.

60-61 Appropriate billing status code.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

2

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

Day of the Year 62-64 Enter the Julian day of the year the response 

is prepared. Note: The response must be 

forwarded within three calendar days of this 

day.

Amount 65-73 For billing status codes AI and DD, 

65-67. Enter the year and month of credit 

of the bill in question. 

68-79. Leave blank.

Otherwise enter the adjustment amount.

Unit Price 74-80 Perpetuate from the request
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3891-3892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1835]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

ITU Proposal for Cost Recovery

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission seeks comment on the 
appropriateness and feasibility of a proposal by the International 
Telecommunications Commission (ITU) for cost recovery for registering 
and processing satellite notifications.

[[Page 3892]]

    In particular, the Commission seeks comment on how the Commission 
could continue to make the ITU notifications while ensuring that the 
applicant makes cost recovery payments directly to the ITU.

DATES: Submit comments on or before February 27, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before March 27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Richard B. Engelman, Chief Planning and 
Negotiations Division, International Bureau, Federal Communications 
Commission, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the June 23-27, 1997 meeting of the 
International Telecommunications Union Council, the subject of ITU cost 
recovery for registering and processing satellite notifications, as 
well as other products and services including terrestrial 
notifications, was addressed. The Council agreed to Resolution 1113 
that adopted the principle of cost recovery for satellite registrations 
and notifications. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) seeks 
comment on the appropriateness and feasibility of the recovery by the 
ITU of such fees and how, if adopted, the ITU cost recovery fees should 
be administered within the FCC notification process.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1835 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
No. D-2550.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Richard Charles Bagdasarian.

562 U.S. 1000, 131 S. Ct. 556,

178 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8373.

November 1, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 815, 131 S. Ct. 407, 178 L. Ed. 2d 271, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7484.