alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Environmental Protection Division

2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Suite 1456, Atlanta, Georgia 30334

Judson H. Turner, Director

(404) 656

- 4713

February 3 , 2015

Beverly Banister, Director

Air, Pesticides & Toxics Management Division

US EPA Region 4

61 Forsyth St ., SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

Dear M s

. Banister :

I have attached the AMP Report s ( AMP600 and AMP450 NC ) for certification of the

201 4 Georgia PM 2.5 monitoring data

. The ambient concentration data and the quality

assurance data are submitted to AQS. The ambient air data are accurate to the best of

my knowledge

, taking into consideration the quality assurance findings.

If you should have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 363

- 7004 or

DeAnna.Oser@dnr.state.ga.us

Sincerely,

DeAnna Oser

Program Manager

Ambient Monitoring Program

Cc: Todd Rinck, US EPA, Region IV

Darren Palmer, US EPA, Region IV

EPA Correspondence File
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

A.U., G.U., AND F.U.,

ADULT CHILDREN

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 284

- CV

Appeal from the

388th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 200 3CM2325 )

MEMO RANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant, Juan Uribe, to dismiss the

appeal pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(2) because the parties have entered into an agreement

which has resolved all matters in controversy between them. We grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

August 27, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.45. APPENDIX 3.45**

**SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT CANCELLATION**

## 

**AP3.49-**

AP3.45-1

APPENDIX 3.45
84

Table 46. Tuberculosis Cases and Percentages, by Excess Alcohol Use,1 Ages >15 Years: 

Reporting Areas, 2016

Total 

cases

Cases with information on

excess alcohol use

Cases reporting

excess alcohol use

Reporting area

United States 8,878

No.

8,748

(%)

(98.5)

No.

875

(%)

(10.0)

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York State2

New York City

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

108 108 (100.0) 16 (14.8)

50 49 (98.0) 16 (32.7)

185 182 (98.4) 29 (15.9)

86 86 (100.0) 11 (12.8)

2,011 1,962 (97.6) 143 (7.3)

61 60 (98.4) 6 (10.0)

51 51 (100.0) 3 (5.9)

15 15 (100.0) 1 (6.7)

25 25 (100.0) 2 (8.0)

616 614 (99.7) 73 (11.9)

283 278 (98.2) 43 (15.5)

115 113 (98.3) 6 (5.3)

14 13 (92.9) 1 (7.7)

326 322 (98.8) 37 (11.5)

102 102 (100.0) 13 (12.7)

48 45 (93.8) 4 (8.9)

39 39 (100.0) 5 (12.8)

90 90 (100.0) 9 (10.0)

122 116 (95.1) 16 (13.8)

23 23 (100.0) 1 (4.3)

214 207 (96.7) 9 (4.3)

182 181 (99.5) 6 (3.3)

125 124 (99.2) 12 (9.7)

149 149 (100.0) 7 (4.7)

57 56 (98.2) 7 (12.5)

99 97 (98.0) 7 (7.2)

4 4 (100.0) 0 (0)

25 20 (80.0) 1 (5.0)

53 53 (100.0) 4 (7.5)

14 14 (100.0) 4 (28.6)

282 279 (98.9) 13 (4.7)

37 36 (97.3) 9 (25.0)

193 191 (99.0) 14 (7.3)

554 548 (98.9) 9 (1.6)

206 206 (100.0) 24 (11.7)

21 21 (100.0) 3 (14.3)

135 132 (97.8) 15 (11.4)

72 70 (97.2) 13 (18.6)

65 65 (100.0) 13 (20.0)

164 164 (100.0) 9 (5.5)

11 11 (100.0) 0 (0)

87 83 (95.4) 15 (18.1)

12 12 (100.0) 2 (16.7)

98 98 (100.0) 17 (17.3)

1,181 1,180 (99.9) 188 (15.9)

18 18 (100.0) 1 (5.6)

5 5 (100.0) 1 (20.0)

196 196 (100.0) 13 (6.6)

199 187 (94.0) 16 (8.6)

14 13 (92.9) 1 (7.7)

35 34 (97.1) 7 (20.6)

1 1 (100.0) 0 (0)

American Samoa3

Fed. States of Micronesia3

Guam3

Marshall Islands3

N. Mariana Islands3

Puerto Rico3

Republic of Palau3

U.S. Virgin Islands3

1 0 (0) 0 (0)

86 85 (98.8) 1 (1.2)

63 57 (90.5) 2 (3.5)

131 130 (99.2) 24 (18.5)

18 18 (100.0) 0 (0)

68 68 (100.0) 9 (13.2)

20 20 (100.0) 2 (10.0)

0 0 ... 0 ...

1

Excess alcohol use within past 12 months of TB diagnosis. Percentage based on 52 reporting areas (50 states, New York City, and the 

District of Columbia).

2

Excludes New York City.

3

Not included in U.S. totals. 

Note: Ellipses (...) indicate that the percentage cannot be calculated, and the denominator is 0.
No. 11-5507.

#### Robert Singleton, Petitioner v. Six Flags Over Georgia, et al.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 321,

181 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6217,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-1394.

#### Willie M. Godley, Petitioner v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 103,

181 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6783.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 857.
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FJE/FJF FORMAT**

**REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF FUEL BILLING ANDFOLLOW-UP ON REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF FUEL BILLING**

126

	APPENDIX 3.15

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-4686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER HAROLD GOINS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:10-cr-00107-FL-1)

Submitted: May 10, 2022 Decided: May 17, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: G. Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defender, Eric Joseph Brignac, Chief 

Appellate Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, David A. Bragdon, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4686 Doc: 20 Filed: 05/17/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Harold Goins, Jr., appeals his 240-month sentence, arguing that the 

district court erroneously sentenced him as an armed career criminal, see 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(e), because one of his predicates is invalid. However, as Goins correctly concedes, 

his challenge is foreclosed by United States v. Dodge, 963 F.3d 379, 381-85 (4th Cir. 2020), 

which held that the predicate offense at issue—North Carolina breaking and entering, N.C.

Gen. Stat. § 14-54(a)—categorically qualifies as a violent felony for purposes of the Armed 

Career Criminal Act. And, as Goins further acknowledges, this panel is not at liberty to 

overrule Dodge. See United States v. Williams, 808 F.3d 253, 261 (4th Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4686 Doc: 20 Filed: 05/17/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.1

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION(In thousands)

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                     | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001   | 2000
|------------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------ | ----
|
|Income from continuing               |      |      |      |        |     
|operations before income taxes       |      |      | $    | 44,721 |     
|                                     |      |      |      |        |     
|Fixed charges 1                      |      |     
|Interest expense                     |      |      |      | 17,339 |     
|Amortization of debt issuance        |      |     
|cost                                 |      |      |      | 56     |     
|Interest included in rental expense  |      |      |      | 2,894  |     
|                                     |     
|Total                                |      |      |      | 20,289 |     
|                                     |      |      |      |        |     
|Earnings 2                           |      |      | $    | 65,010 |     
|                                     |      |      |      |        |     
|Ratio of earnings available to cover |      |     
|fixed charges                        |      |      |      | 3.2    |     

|1 | Fixed
charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt issuance cost plus
that portion of lease rental expense representative of the interest factor.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | Earnings
consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit (23)




                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Ennis Business Forms, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 2-81124) on Form S-8 of Ennis Business Forms, Inc. of our reports
dated April 15, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Ennis
Business Forms, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 1999 and 1998 and
the related statements of earnings and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended
February 28, 1999, which reports appears in or are incorporated by reference
in the 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Ennis Business Forms, Inc.



                                   KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
May 28, 1999
Prepárese. El cáncer

de pulmón se puede

extender al cerebro.

Prepárese. El cáncer

de pulmón se puede

extender al cerebro.

Rose, 59 años, Texas Rose, 59 años, Texas

#CDCConsejos

Fumar le causó cáncer de pulmón a Rose. 

Ella tuvo que mudarse de un pueblo 

pequeño que le encantaba para poder 

obtener los tratamientos que necesitaba, 

como la quimioterapia y radiación, y le 

tuvieron que extirpar parte de un pulmón. 

Hace poco, el cáncer se extendió a su 

cerebro. Usted puede dejar de fumar.

LLAME AL 1-855-DÉJELO-YA.
AGREEMENT
DDSP/LIU 1310 ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

LIU 1310 WILL:

Forward request(s) for ADR to the DDSP Commander/Deputy Commander as a result of
an informal grievance or disciplinary action pending for suspensions, demotions,
removals and unsatisfactory performance appraisals

For disciplinary actions/unsatisfactory performance appraisals, notify Proposing Official.
management official one level above the Deciding Official, and DHRC-N of request for
ADR

For other ADR requests (after informal grievance meeting has occurred) notify
employee’s immediate supervisor, management official one level above the immediate
supervisor, and DHRC-N of request for ADR

Schedule ADR and Mediator

Notify Union Steward/Official

Provide date and time of ADR and request confirmation from supervisor

Send a reminder to all parties 2-3 days in advance of scheduled ADR

Coordinate location with Command Administrative Personnel

Notify the DDSP Deputy Commander of repeated attendance failures and a pattern of
last-minute cancellations by supervisors.

MANAGEMENT WILL:

Receive notification of ADR

Respond to LIU to approve or disapprove ADR Tequest

If ADR approved, confirm scheduled date/time or request re-scheduling within 24 hours
of approval

Inform LIU 1310 who will be attending ADR and find appropriate replacement(s) as
necessary with the authority to resolve the dispute.

Notify employee and DHRC-N immediately that ADR has been approved and that action
will be held in abeyance until the ADR has been completed.

Notify employee of scheduled ADR within 24 hours of scheduling notification
Coordinate and permit change of shifts for supervisor(s) and employee(s) to attend
scheduled ADR.

Provide a copy of the Request for Disciplinary Action form to the union at the ADR
Provide laptop computer for each session

Forward a copy of signed document to DHRC-N

BOTH PARTIES WILL:

Ensure that the employee, union representative and supervisor have met informally prior
to the action and that both parties have made an effort to resolve the dispute at the lowest
possible level.
Adhere to the RBO tenets ofa collaborative and supportive relationship focused on
improving DDSP’s culture and mission performance.
Respect each other’s position and demonstrate respect for people
By mutual agreement, extend time limits as necessary
Alternate the responsibility for writing of minutes and agreements on a monthly basis

o Management -AUG/OCT/DEC/FEB/APR/JUN


. o Union —- SEP/NOV/JAN/MAR/MAY/JUL
¢ Ensure that a written agreement be signed before adjourning ADR
o Where an agreement is reached. list actions to be completed and associated

timeframes
In cases where an agreement cannot be reached, draft and sign a document stating

that both parties agree that the issue cannot be resolved and that the issue will be
elevated using the formal grievance process.

°

SIGNED:

ge ; .

‘
AL 1310 DLA Distribution Susquehanna

vA ahv a

1) 307 Le
DATE

DATE
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3088 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to adjust certain 

resubmission thresholds for shareholder proposals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to adjust certain resubmission thresholds for shareholder proposals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shareholder Protection 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESUBMISSION THRESHOLDS FOR SHAREHOLDER 

7 PROPOSALS. 

8 The Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise 

9 section 240.14a–8(i)(12) of title 17, Code of Federal Reg10 ulations to— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3088 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (i), adjust the 3 percent 

2 threshold to 6 percent; 

3 (2) in paragraph (ii), adjust the 6 percent 

4 threshold to 15 percent; and 

5 (3) in paragraph (iii), adjust the 10 percent 

6 threshold to 30 percent. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38423-38424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, and 
Section 122 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622, notice is hereby given that on 
June 18, 1998, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Reilly 
Industries, Inc., Civil Action No. 5:98 CV 1409, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern 
Division. This consent decree represents a settlement of claims brought 
by the United States, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., 
against Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation for reimbursement of 
response costs and injunctive relief in connection with the Reilly Tar 
and Chemical Corporation Superfund Site (``Site'') located in 
Tuscarawas County, Ohio.
    Under this settlement with the United States, Reilly Industries 
will implement the remedy for the Site as set forth in the Record of 
Decision issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in 
March 1997, and pay $400,000 in reimbursement of response costs 
incurred by the United States Environmental Protection Agency at the 
Site. In addition, Reilly Industries will pay all future costs for this 
response action, including U.S. EPA's oversight costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Reilly Industries, Inc., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-1282.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, 1800 Bank One 
Center, 600 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, OH

[[Page 38424]]

44114-2600, at the Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be 
obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $19.75 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-18901 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# Bahrain native sees green at DLA records management training

/ Published May 29, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

ShaimaHaji, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Bahrain, started her career as alibrarian for the Navy in 2012. In March, 2013 Haji transferred to DLA to takeon the role of command records management coordinator. 

Recently,Haji traveled to the U.S. for the first time to attend training provided forrecords coordinators at DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa.  Thistraining provided the records management coordinators with the opportunity toget to know one another.  The DLA program provides guidance foragency personnel who create, maintain, store, use, and dispose of records. AsDLA continues to focus on efficiency, the objective of the training was toachieve an uninterrupted flow of information within the DLA network. Haji foundthe experience to be invaluable, as well as inspiring.

“Iwas excited to come here to New Cumberland, to see where DLA Distributionstarts,” said Haji. “Though I have traveled many places, this is the first timeI have been in the United States, and the first time I saw spring and greentrees. The weather is nice,” she continued.

Additionally,Haji found the training to be very helpful, providing her information she couldtake back to Bahrain and use to advance her career. She will be applying for hermaster’s program to further develop her knowledge.  Haji looksforward to more training and video teleconferencing opportunities in thefuture.
Exhibit 99.1



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (The "Registrant")
that the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and
the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.

|      |                   | William L. Stephens    President and Chief Executive Officer                
|----- | ----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 14, 2002 | /s/ George W. Swift                                                         
|      |                   | George W. Swift    Vice President and Secretary    (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris J. Stern, Chief Executive Officer and chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Chris J. Stern     
|                      |  |     |  | Chris J. Stern         
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 10-10925.

#### Raheem Z. Langhorne, Petitioner v. Harris L. Diggs, Jr., Warden.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6361.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 513.
No. 11M12.

#### Robert Benning Balthrope, II, Petitioner v. Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

565 U.S. 808, 132 S. Ct. 78,

181 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6742.

October 3, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 285.