alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM
10-K"), I, Robert W. Cremin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: December 30, 2005

                             By: /s/ Robert W. Cremin
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Robert W. Cremin
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.24

LOGO

3189 Airway Avenue Bldg. C

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

714-427-6363

Fax 714-427-6361

Mr. Charles H. Seeman

6518 Austin Creek Drive

Wake Forest, NC 27587

September 18, 2008

Dear Charles,

We would like to make you the following job offer:

Chief Financial Officer, and

Executive Vice President Finance & Administration

Reporting: Directly to Chairman/CEO

Direct reports: Head of accounting, A/P person (works also as assistant for the president/COO)

Compensation package:



| |  |  | $100,000 base pay, plus $ 20,000 bonus (targets year 1: 50% finance and administration structured in a way compliance is established, 50% 10q and 10k filed in a
timely manner)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Options as per company stock option plan:
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | Sign-up bonus: 50,000 options, vested 1 year, issued after three months of employment
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Options: 50,000 options per end of each year of employment, vested 1 year
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benefits:



| |  |  | 401k as per company regulation
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | Health and dental insurance
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | 15 days of vacation
| | - |  | -------------------



| |  |  | $ 800 per month car allowance
| | - |  | -----------------------------



---

LOGO

Equipment



| |  |  | Blackberry, or I-phone, of choice
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | Laptop computer, of choice
| | - |  | --------------------------

Work base



| |  |  | Raleigh-Durham
| | - |  | --------------

Teaching

We support your part-time professorship at Mount Olive College under the assumption that you will be able to coordinate your work schedule and the teaching assignment so
there is no disadvantage to us.

Most company regulations are documented in the employee handbook.



|                   |  |  |  |                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|Sincerely,         |  |  |  | Accepted             
|                   |  |  |  | Date                 
|                   |  |  |  | 9/19/08              
|                   |  | 
|/s/ Chris J. Stern |  |  |  | /s/ Charles H. Seeman
|Chris J. Stern     |  |  |  | Charles H. Seeman    
|Chairman/CEO       |  |  |  |                      



Page 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan III

Thomas L. Monahan IIIChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2006/s/ Timothy R. Yost

Timothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2006
No. 11-5279.

#### Louis Watley, Petitioner v. Donald Mee, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al.

565 U.S. 899, 132 S. Ct. 291,

181 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5564.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mi vida... 

Prometo protegerte contra 

14 enfermedades graves. 

Él tiene toda su vida por delante. 

Para proteger la salud de su bebé 

ahora y en el futuro, siga el calendario 

de vacunación recomendado por 

los CDC. 

Con salud, todo es posible. 

Vacune a sus hijos. 

1-800-CDC-INFO

www.cdc.gov/espanol/vacunas

CS238300-E

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/events/niiw/promotional/print-materials/downloads/p-dad-infant-sp.pdf perenne
No. 10-10254.

#### Andre Simms, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 131,

181 L. Ed. 2d 52,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5818.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 402 Ill. App. 3d 1191, 376 Ill. Dec. 788, 1 N.E.3d 121.
ilala}alslel7) 2/2 An 77 7 77 7] 7] 7] 8] 1. TOTAL PRICE BSP FROW [3 SHIPTO
we 213 14}5/6]7/8/9]0 eae alge
Dent legate) hoe TM My] unre Price. FiDoutaRs [crs| SW310L M94700
) MINGATY
SASYSR5S.-FA00004 1000000011] 37 0000000045] 48 | MCLB 814 RADFORD BLVD
a 7~ 5.00C.DATE: | }6. NMFC 7. FRT RATE |8, TYPE CARGO 9. PS
EE 17361.) 062800 085 | 72329 U
Z 288 RECD {11.UP [12 UNITWEIGHT [13.UNITCUBE |14. UFC 15. St
428 «, {00001} 0000000.30 | 0000.189 |U35070 0
ae 6 AetcigsaticaTON NOMENCLATURE
qo ° M947007361D525 RADIO/TV ‘RECEIVING SET CHASSIS ETC
q 17 ATEN F NOMENCLATURE
g ; SUPPORT,RADIO RECEI
“225 REONT “TiS:NO CONT 20. TOTAL WEIGHT 27 TOTAL CUBE
yseo8 vying
Eye
e25015913352"

a im HNN meng M
pera ts
8° 98s SR5 EA 00004 A 00000001137
PROJ: ‘ REC OCN:
‘SPI:
ze PO#: So DMID: A.
2gHCC MSG:,.NOT REGULATED AS HAZAR TY CARGO MSG;

DD FORM 1348-14, JUN 86 ISSUE RELEASE/REGEIPT DOCUMEN.

L O Cc D EL MSDS ; Sr0¢r FUND BIN;

DT7361/TI1421 LOC DEL D/C-PK: CFLT/CFLT DSG: 001 PCN: 83N17PK |

PICKLIST CONTROL NUMBER:
HEAMPOST14194
WORK ORDER NUMBER:

DELIVERY DESTINATION:
69000

16.0400

16.04v00

16.04v00
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC**

**ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Dynamic Materials Corporation:

 

(1)          Form S-8 No. 333-115563

(2)          Form S-8 No. 333-143355

(3)          Form S-3 No. 333-150231

 

 

of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Dynamic Materials Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Dynamic Materials Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 
|                     | /s/   Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                     |                             |
| Denver,   Colorado       |                             |
| February 28,   2011 |                             |

 

1

----
DRMS CONTRACT NUMBER 99-4001-0004

Supplemental Agreement 3

Page 2 of 2

**WHEREAS,**Part II, Section V, Demil “B” and “Q” property, states in pertinent part that:

All property offered under this contract requires Mutilation, unless specifically excluded from Mutilation by the Government. The mutilation requirement includes metallic DEMIL Code “A” Property. DEMIL Code “A” property generally excluded from the Mutilation requirement includes: tires, lockers, ammunition cans, production stock/residue (bars, plate rod, wire, borings and turnings), wire and cable, pipe and tube construction material/residue (lumber, block, brick, window, I-beams), vehicles, wood products, furniture and white goods (appliances, e.g. refrigerators). 

**WHEREAS,**in the interest of achieving cost savings for both the Purchaser and the Agency, the parties hereto mutually agree to modify Part II, Section V. to exempt non-demil required scrap classified in the following Standard Waste and Scrap Classification (SCL)  Codes from the mutilation requirements:

C01(burlap),, C02(canvas), C03(rags), C04(webbing), C05(rope), C06(rayon), C07(nylon), C08(wool), C09(cotton), C10(silk), C1A(textile scrap, misc), C1B(cotton comforters), C1C(cotton mattresses), C1D(hawser), C1E({polyesters), C1F(poncho), C1G(rubberized clothing, C1H(Sleeping bags), CB6(baled/shredded rayon), CB7(baled/shredded nylon), CB8(baled/shredded wool), CB9(baled/shredded cotton).

**NOW, THEREFORE,**it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto to this modification that:

1. Purchaser will submit to the SCO a listing of NSN’s for each particular scrap accumulation. DRMS will review and provide concurrence to the Purchaser.

2. Upon DRMS concurrence, Part II, Section V. of the IFB is hereby modified to exempt the Contractor from mutilating non-demil required textile scrap within that particular scrap accumulation. 

3. Textile scrap is identified in the following SCL Codes: C01(burlap),, C02(canvas), C03(rags), C04(webbing), C05(rope), C06(rayon), C07(nylon), C08(wool), C09(cotton), C10(silk), C1A(textile scrap, misc), C1B(cotton comforters), C1C(cotton mattresses), C1D(hawser), C1E({polyesters), C1F(poncho), C1G(rubberized clothing, C1H(Sleeping bags), CB6(baled/shredded rayon), CB7(baled/shredded nylon), CB8(baled/shredded wool), CB9(baled/shredded cotton).

4. The Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that non-demil required textile scrap received identified as Munitions List Items (MLI) or Commerce Control List Items (CCLI) will maintain the identity of Munitions List Items (MLI) or Commerce Control List Items (CCLI) and requires the Purchaser to submit to the SCO a properly completed End Use Certificate (EUC) and obtain a Trade Security Control Clearance.

5. All other applicable terms and conditions of the contract remain in effect, including but not limited to Parts I-VI, and Articles One (1) through Twenty-Three (23); and

6. This modification will become effective upon the date of the last affixed signature to this modification.

////////////NOTHING FOLLOWS////////////
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30914

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MELVIN HAMILTON, JR.,

 DefendantAppellant.

_____________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-23-ALL-A

______________________________________

March 16, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin Hamilton, Jr., appeals the upward departure sentence imposed following his plea of

guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Hamilton argues that the statement in the

presentence report (PSR) that the information contained in the PSR was supported by reliable

informationdid not constitute reliable informationasrequired bytheSentencingGuidelines. Hamilton

also argues that it was inappropriate for the court to rely upon his juvenile arrests.

An upward departure is normally reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v.

Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). Hamilton, however, failed to object to or

contradict the PSR’s notation of factors that might warrant an upward departure or object at the
 

sentencing hearing raising the issue he now argues. The upward departure is therefore reviewable

only for plain error. United States v. McDowell, 109 F.3d 214, 216 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Hamilton’s PSR contained a brief description of each arrest. Hamilton offered no rebuttal

evidence to refute the information in the PSR. Accordingly, the sentencing court was free to adopt

that information asitsfindings without further inquiry or explanation. United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d

114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). Furthermore, Hamilton has not shown that the criminal history at issue in

United States v. Cantu-Dominguez, 898 F.2d 968 (5th Cir. 1990), is so similar to the juvenile court

record in the instant case that an error, if any, is “clear or obvious.” McDowell, 109 F.3d at 216.

Hamilton has not shown that the district court’s decision to depart upward was plain error.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

ABOUT THIS MAP: This map shows the estimated distribution of Ixodes scapularis tick populations, commonly known as blacklegged or deer ticks. 

However, tick abundance within this area varies locally. The map does not represent the risk of contracting any specific tickborne illness. Please 

consult your local health department or Cooperative Extension office to learn about the risks of tickborne disease in your local area. 08/2018
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

Bibliography

Eisen RJ, Eisen L, Beard CB. County-Scale Distribution of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the Continental United States. J Med 

Entomol. 2016 Mar;53(2):349-86.

Hahn MB, Jarnevich CS, Monaghan AJ, Eisen RJ. Modeling the Geographic Distribution of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the 

Contiguous United States. J Med Entomol. 2016 Sep1;53(5):1176-1191. 

Hahn MB, Jarnevich CS, Monaghan AJ, Eisen RJ. Response: The Geographic Distribution of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) Revisited: The Importance 

of Assumptions about Error Balance. J Med Entomol. 2017 Sep 1;54(5):1104-1106.
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING FOR

RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONERS & HEAT PUMPS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Room 1E- 245 May 5, 2010



### Purpose

The Department is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy conservation standard preliminary analysis. DOE will also explain its plans for the remaining analyses including its methodologies, assumptions, and data sources and will seek comment on the fore mentioned topics.



### Agenda

9:00

– 9:05 am Welcome

9:05

– 9:10 am Attendee Introductions and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9:10

– 9:25 am Brief Opening Remarks

Wes Anderson/Doug Brookman Opportunity for interested parties to make brief summary

comments.

9:25

– 10:00 am Rulemaking Overview, Regional Standards Background,

Consensus Agreement, and Combined Rulemaking

Wes Anderson/Robert Carmichael Overview of legislative authority for the rulemaking, regional standard, the details of the consensus agreement, and the option of a combined rulemaking with furnaces and furnace fans.

10:00

– 10:30 am Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and

Engineering Analysis

Matt Millard Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and engineering analysis.

10:30

– 10:45 am Break10:45

– 11:45 am Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Energy Use

Characterization, Life-Cycle Cost, and Payback Period Analysis

Mike Scott and Dave Winiarski Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use analysis, life-cycle cost and payback period analyses.

11:45

– 12:15 am Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

Greg Rosenquist Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the shipments analysis, national energy savings, net present value, and a characterization of the results.

12:15

– 12:25 am Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Matt Millard Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach to be used and factors to be considered for the manufacturer impact analysis.

12:25

– 12:30 pm Next Steps and Closing

Wes Anderson Participants will discuss outstanding issues and concluding

remarks.
# C_2014024EN.01003501.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/35

---

Action brought on 20 November 2013 — AIC v OHIM — ACV Manufacturing (Heat exchanger inserts)

(Case T-616/13)

2014/C 24/65

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AIC S.A. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ACV Manufacturing (Seneffe, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 293/2012-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 293/2012-3;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The design for a product described as ‘heat exchanger inserts’ — Registered Community Design No 1 137 152-0001

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: It was alleged that the design did not fulfil the requirements of Article 4(1) and (2), in conjunction with Articles 5 and 6 and in particular Article 8(1) and (2) CDR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested RCD invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(2) CDR.

Pleas in law:

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7335

CHARLES BEA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TIMOTHY A. KELLY, Commissioner; RICHARD CULLEN, Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-626-3) Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Bea, Appellant Pro Se. Jane D. Hickey, Garland Locks Bigley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Bea appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas petition contesting his continued detention in a state mental facility. We have reviewed the record and find no error. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.5. APPENDIX 8.5**

**REQUISITION FOLLOW-UP**

AP8.5.1.  The following entries will apply when no positive supply status has been received from the supply source:

AP8.5.2.  The following entries will apply when positive supply status has been received from a supply source:

AP8.5.3.  The following entries apply when a shipment status transaction is received but it does not contain adequate information for shipment tracing under DTR 4500.9-R, “Defense Transportation Regulation[footnoteRef:4]: [4:  Procedures requesting and/or providing the Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) of the initial shipping activity last reported as not implemented by Government Services Administration (GSA).  Refer to AMCL 5. ] 

2

2

APPENDIX 3.5

AP8.5-1

APPENDIX 8.5