Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search

		Submit


Transportation Safety


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





State-Specific Costs of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths										Related Pages
										cost img 1
								cost img 2
About 38,000 people are killed in motor vehicle traffic crashes each year in the United States.1Traffic crash deaths resulted in $55 billion in medical and work loss costs in addition to the immeasurable burden on the victims’ families and friends in 2018.1
The fact sheets below highlight the cost of deaths from motor vehicle traffic crashes and show which age groups and types of road users account for the largest portion of these costs in each state. CDC also includes information within these fact sheets about proven strategies that could strengthen each state’s motor vehicle injury prevention efforts and save both lives and resources. Rates of seat belt use are 92% in states with primary enforcement laws but only 86% in states with secondary enforcement or no seat belt laws.2 Such a difference is important since seat belt use reduces the risk of death by about half.2 The primary enforcement of seat belt laws for all seating positions is a proven strategy that can significantly reduce the number of injuries and deaths from motor vehicle crashes and the related costs.
Take a look at the fact sheets below to find costs and prevention strategies specific to each state.State-Specific Cost of Crash Deaths Fact SheetsFrequently Asked QuestionsDownload
Note: The state-specific fact sheets contain 2018 data.
Alabamapdf icon
Alaskapdf icon
Arizonapdf icon
Arkansaspdf icon
Californiapdf icon
Coloradopdf icon
Connecticutpdf icon
Delawarepdf icon
District of Columbiapdf icon
Floridapdf icon
Georgiapdf icon
Hawaiipdf icon
Idahopdf icon
Illinoispdf icon
Indianapdf icon
Iowapdf icon
Kansaspdf icon
Kentuckypdf icon
Louisianapdf icon
Mainepdf icon
Marylandpdf icon
Massachusettspdf icon
Michiganpdf icon
Minnesotapdf icon
Mississippipdf icon
Missouripdf icon
Montanapdf icon
Nebraskapdf icon
Nevadapdf icon
New Hampshirepdf icon
New Jerseypdf icon
New Mexicopdf icon
New Yorkpdf icon
North Carolinapdf icon
North Dakotapdf icon
Ohiopdf icon
Oklahomapdf icon
Oregonpdf icon
Pennsylvaniapdf icon
Rhode Islandpdf icon
South Carolinapdf icon
South Dakotapdf icon
Tennesseepdf icon
Texaspdf icon
Utahpdf icon
Vermontpdf icon
Virginiapdf icon
Washingtonpdf icon
West Virginiapdf icon
Wisconsinpdf icon
Wyomingpdf icon**1. Where did CDC obtain the data used for this analysis?**
The data used for this cost analysis came from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) National Vital Statistics System and CDC’s Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). WISQARS is an online, interactive system that provides reports of injury-related data. Visit CDC’s WISQARS to find the costs of injury deaths and nonfatal injuries.
**2. Did this analysis look at the total cost of fatal crashes, or just costs of deaths from crashes?**
This analysis only included the cost of medical care and work loss for people who died in motor vehicle crashes. These costs are conservative because the analysis  did not examine total costs of fatal crashes, which could involve medical care for people who survived a crash in which someone else was killed. It also did not include property damage or vehicle damage costs or the cost related to insurance.
**3. What are work loss costs?**
Work loss costs are estimates of how much a person who died would have earned over the course of their life, had they not died. Work loss costs include the total estimated salary, various benefits, and value of household work that an average person of the same age and sex would be expected to produce over the remainder of their lifetime.
**4. Why are work loss costs so high for motor vehicle crash deaths?**
Work loss costs are based on estimates of how much a person who died in a crash would have earned over the course of their life, had they not died. Motor vehicle crash deaths disproportionately affect younger people, who have the potential to contribute to the workforce for many years. When a younger person dies, the result is a higher work loss cost.
**5. How can costs due to motor vehicle crashes be reduced?**
The best way to reduce costs due to crash-related deaths is to **prevent crashes**. Effective strategies for preventing crashes include graduated drivers licensing systems, sobriety checkpoints, and ignition interlocks for those convicted of driving while intoxicated.
Another way to reduce costs is to **prevent injuries** when crashes happen. Increasing car seat and booster seat use and increasing seat belt use through primary seat belt laws that cover all seating positions are proven ways to prevent injuries during a crash. Riding in vehicles with advanced safety features like occupant-sensitive/dual-stage airbags, electronic stability control, rollover protection, and automatic crash notification can also help mitigate injuries and improve emergency response.
CDC offers an  interactive calculator, called MV PICCS 3.0 (Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States). This tool can help state decision makers prioritize and select from a suite of 14 effective motor vehicle injury prevention interventions.
**6. Why did CDC choose to only look at state-based costs related to deaths and not non-fatal crash injuries?**
The data needed to assess non-fatal crash costs were not available for all states. Successful state data linkage systems, however, can collect, link, analyze, and report on multiple sources of motor vehicle crash data. Linking police crash reports to medical records can be used to determine state medical costs for non-fatal crash injuries. Linking Information for Nonfatal Crash Surveillance (LINCS) is a guide that helps states start or expand their data linkage programs. The guide explains the key components of successful linkage programs and outlines the data-linkage process.
To learn more about successful state motor vehicle data linkage systems, visit Assessment of Characteristics of State Data Linkage Systems.
**7. Isn’t it expected that larger states with larger populations would naturally have higher costs?**
States with larger populations often have more people on the roadways, and therefore more crashes may occur. However, just because a state has a large or small population does not mean that its costs should be proportional. Wyoming, for example, has the smallest population of all the states, but does not have the lowest cost. Almost half of the United States population lives in the states with the 10 highest costs.
**8. How were road users classified on the state fact sheets?**
People killed in motor vehicle traffic crashes can be classified as motor vehicle occupants, motorcyclists, bicyclists, pedestrians, other road users, or unspecified road users. “Unspecified” indicates that the road user type was not specified on the death certificate. Recent research has found that deaths classified as unspecified are most likely motor vehicle occupants.3 The sum of occupant and unspecified road user deaths approximately equals the number of occupant deaths reported in other surveillance systems such as FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System). Based on this research, the cost estimates for motor vehicle occupants are based on the combined sum of the number of occupant and unspecified road user deaths. Motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians are reported as they were reported on the death certificate. In 2018, there were only 9 motor vehicle traffic deaths classified as “other” road users nationwide, so these road users were excluded from the state estimates that report costs by type of road user.
**9. Why do some costs by age group or road user type not sum to 100%?**
For some states, the costs by age group or road user type do not sum to 100%. This is due to rounding percentages for an age group or road user type, such as children or motorcyclists, to whole numbers and then summing these percentages to get a total.
**10. Why are there no costs for some groups in some states?**
The estimate of zero cost is based on no deaths being reported in that year for that group. For example, two states reported no traffic deaths among children aged 0–14 in 2018. These states have an estimate of $0 for the cost of traffic deaths among children in 2018.ReferencesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System) [online]. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html Accessed 2 Sep 2020.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts: Seat Belt Use in 2019—Overall Results. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC; 2019. Publication no. DOT-HS-812-875. Available at https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812875external icon Accessed 9 Sep 2020.
Mack KA, Hedegaard H, Ballesteros MF, Warner M, Eames J, and Sauber-Schatz EK. The need to improve information on road user type in National Vital Statistics System mortality data. *Traffic Injury Prevention*, 2019;20(3): 276-81. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15389588.2019.1576036external icon
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  November 5, 2020					Content source: 	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control homeTransportation Safety
Data and Resources for States and Tribesplus icon
LINCS Guide
State Data Linkage Systems
Cost Data and Prevention Policiesplus icon
Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS)plus icon
Intervention Fact Sheets
Intervention Glossary
Costs of Crash Deaths
Child Passenger Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
What Works: Strategies to Increase Car Seat and Booster Seat Use
Publications
Resources
Booster Seat Planning Guide
Seat Beltsplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Increase Restraint Use
Publications
Policy Impact
Teen Driversplus icon
Get the Facts
Parents Are the Key
GDL Planning Guide
Publications
Older Adult Driversplus icon
MyMobility Planplus icon
Resources
Spanish Resources
Related Pages
Medicines Risk Fact Sheet
Impaired Drivingplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Reduce or Prevent Alcohol-Impaired Driving
Increasing Alcohol Ignition Interlock Use
Publications
Distracted Driving
Pedestrian Safetyplus icon
Publications
Tribal Road Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
Roadway to Safer Tribal Communities Fact Sheets
Best Practices Guide
Program Evaluation Guide
Publications
Motorcycle Safety
Bicycle Safetyplus icon
Publications
Global Road Safetyplus icon
Publications & Resources To receive email updates about this topic, enter your email address: Email Address			What's this?				Submit


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue