alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS

- 14

- 060

- E March 7, 2014

Exemption No. 10950 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 1014

Allen Howell

Owner Wings of Eagles, LLC 276 Doug Warpoole Rd Smyma

, TN 37167

Dear : Mr. Howe ll

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 20

, 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Wings of Eagles, LLC ( Wings ) for an exemption from § 141

. 27(b)(1) and (b)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Wings to apply for a provisional pilot school certificate immediately.

The FAA has de termined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent

- setting petition , and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Wings.

The FAA issued a denial of exemp tion in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No

. 10259 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that requirement to graduate at least 10 different people from the school’s approved training cours e in the proceeding 24 calendar months is a critical metric in determining a pilot school’s quality of instruction. This required period of evaluation is used to determine if the

school’s Training Course Outline, (TCO) have been adequately developed and a re being properly implemented. The FAA believes this requirement is an important basis for part 141 pilot school certification, and granting this exemption would allow other similarly situated pilot schools to apply for the same exemption, thus reducing t he overall level of safety.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No

. 10259 also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption woul d no t be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Wings of Eagles for an exemption from 14 CFR § 141.27(b)(1)

, a nd (b)(3)

.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
# C_2015320EN.01001401.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/14

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Elena Delia Pondiche v Statul român, Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării

(Case C-608/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Grant of dependent child allowances - Determining the applicable law according to the date of birth of the child and not according to the date of conception - No implementation of EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2015/C 320/19)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elena Delia Pondiche

Applicant:

Defendant: Statul român, Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Sibiu (Romania), by decision of 20 November 2014.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
No. 11-5520.

#### Victor Ramirez, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 323,

181 L. Ed. 2d 200,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6459.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 14, 2016

jam

Order 

Clerk

September 14, 2016

154136 (27)

ANTHONY EDWARD CIAVONE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 154136

COA: 331220

SANFORD SCHULMAN, Wayne CC: 15-008054-NM

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED as moot, because Plaintiff-Appellant has paid the filing fee in full.
Exhibit 21
 JO-ANN STORES, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 State or Country of
    
    Percent owned byName
    
    Incorporation
    
    RegistrantJo-Ann Stores Supply Chain Management, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %FCA of Ohio, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %House of Fabrics, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Team Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %Fabric World of Cleveland, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %Joann.com, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Jo-Ann Stores Asia, Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    100
    %Jo-Ann Stores Support Center, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6519

ELLIS RICHARD DOUGLAS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GRAHAM SYLVESTER, Officer; BRIAN BACON, Officer; ELFRAM BOWIE, Officer; CARL TROGDON,

Officer; MICHAEL VAUGH, Officer; JESSE KNIGHT,

Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHARLES DAWKINS, Officer,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-90-940-K)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ellis Richard Douglas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Charles

Verderaime, VERDERAIME & DUBOIS, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Ellis Douglas appeals the jury's verdict for the

Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) civil action. Douglas,

who brought this suit alleging excessive force by several police

officers when they arrested him, urges overturning the jury's verdict because he alleges that the police officers committed perjury

during the trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the jury's verdict. Additionally, we

deny Douglas's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-10700.

#### Anthony Dawain Shaw, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 160,

181 L. Ed. 2d 75,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6530.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 711.
----

 Exhibit 32.1 

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results  of operations. 

October 10, 2003

/s/ Zhang Lebing                                           Zhang Lebing, Chief Executive Officer 

----
Remove an Existing AD Action 

Directorate Identifier: FAA 2013-0315 ~~~~~~~---------------

Docket No: FAA-2013-CE-006-AD 

Originating Office Tracking No: --------------

Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-/R-M-8040./C. DOUBLE CLICK tofollow the link. 

For guidance on rescinding an AD or withdrawing an NPRM, 

see the AD Manual. ~ 

Action: (Select from the following drop-down list): 

Withdraw an NPRM 

l. Project Engineer 

Name/Title/Branch: Taylor Martin 

Telephone: 816-329-4138 

Fax: 816-329-4080 

Email: taylor.martin@faa.gov 

I 2. Directorate Project_ Officer or Backup Engineer (if Applicable) 

Name/Title/Branch: 

Telephone: 

Fax: 

I 3. Provide one of the following or attach a Federal Register copy of the existing AD action. 

(gj Copy Attached 

AD No: FAA 2013-0315 

Docket No: F AA-20 13-CE-006-AD 

Directorate ID: 

4. Why are you removing this AD action? (For example, are there new findings? Did we receive comments 

with supporting data? Are the same actions required by another AD?) G 

Airplanes affected on NPRM not certified in U.S. 

5. Explain in detail why the unsafe condition no longer exists and will never recur on these 

products worldwide. (Expand on the reason given in 4, providing more details. If the unsafe condition is 

covered by another AD, so state) 

Airplanes affected on NPRM not certified in U.S. 

I 6. Does this action affect any other existing or proposed AD action? If yes, explain 

No 

I 7. Provide any information that hasn't been addressed in the questions above. 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

#14~ Date 

COS Focal (Optional) Date 

Date 

AEG Representative (except for appliances) Date 

MIDO/CMOIMIO Representative Date 

*Signature required if a QC problem is involved 

EIR NUMBER (MIDO/CMOIMIO use only) 

A CO/Staff Office Manager Date 

3
No. 10-11026.

#### Joseph Young, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 204,

181 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6005.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 233.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Ray, Petitioner,*

No. 92076-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46035-1-II, July 14, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1052. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
No. 11-23.

#### Lillie M. Middlebrooks, Petitioner v. St. Coletta of Greater Washington, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 243,

181 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5642.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19254]



[[Page 38843]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Approved Collection

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approval of information collection (1010-0051).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and 
respondent burden, this notice informs the public and other Federal 
agencies of the approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
of a collection of information. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person 
is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis London, Rules Processing Team, 
telephone (703) 787-1600. You may also contact Alexis London to obtain 
a copy of this collection of information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: 30 CFR Part 250, Subpart L, Oil and Gas Production 
Measurement, Surface Commingling, and Security.
    Abstract: On May 12, 1998, MMS published a final rule on the titled 
collection (RIN 1010-AC23, 63 FR 26362). A correction to the final rule 
on May 20, 1998 (63 FR 27677) made the rule effective on June 29, 1998. 
The Paperwork Reduction Act section of the preamble to the final rule 
stated that the information collection requirements would not take 
effect until approved by OMB. The preamble to the final rule provided 
the required public comment period and announced that we had submitted 
the information collection request to OMB for approval. On July 7, 
1998, OMB approved the collection of information required in 30 CFR 
250, subpart L, with an expiration date of July 31, 2001.
    MMS Information Collection Clearance Officer: Jo Ann Lauterbach 
(202) 208-7744.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
William S. Cook,
Acting Chief, Engineering and Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 98-19254 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
# C_2014175EN.01004101.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — MHCS v OHIM — Ambra (DORATO)

(Case T-249/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark DORATO - Earlier Community and national figurative trade marks representing bottle neck labels - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 50(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

2014/C 175/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MHCS (Épernay, France) (represented by: P. Boutron, N. Moya Fernández and L.-É. Balleydier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, N. Bambara and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Ambra SA (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. KaczanParchimowicz, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 February 2013 (Case R 1877/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between MHCS and Ambra SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders MHCS to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ambra SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders MHCS to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ambra SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20. 7. 2013.

1

---
Exhibit
      32.1


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Marsh,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2005











/s/
      Thomas B. Marsh


Chief
      Executive Officer, President
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19077]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 1998 / 
Notices

[[Page 38365]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service
[TM-98-00-5]


The National Organic Standards Board Meeting: Correction

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published a document 
in the Federal Register of July 10, 1998, concerning NOSB meeting. The 
document contained an incorrect time for the Public Input session on 
July 21, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Jones, Program Manager, Room 
2510 South Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, AMS, 
Transportation and Marketing, National Organic Program Staff, P.O. Box 
96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456. Phone (202) 720-3252.

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of July 10, 1998, in FR Doc. 98-
18540; on page 37314, make the following corrections:
    In the first column, under the Dates caption the times for July 21, 
1998, should read 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    In the second column, under the ``Type of Meeting'' caption the 
second sentence should read ``NOSB has scheduled time for public input 
on July 21, 1998, beginning at 9:00 a.m. and continuing until 12:00 
p.m.''

    Dated: July 13, 1998.
Eileen S. Stommes,
Deputy Administrator, Transportation and Marketing.
[FR Doc. 98-19077 Filed 7-14-98; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
January 14 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ASHLEY MARTINS AND A LL OTHER OCCUPANTS , Appellant
NO. 14

- 13

- 00740

- CV V.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE AS SOCIATION AKA FANNIE MAE , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on August 12, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it me ritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Ashley Martins and All Other Occupants. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 99.2

OO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|/s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

16

---

QuickLinks
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements
      on
      Form S-3 (No. 333-134102) and Form S-8 (No. 333-104060 and No. 333-13289))
      of
      DCAP Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 14, 2007 with
      respect to the consolidated financial statements of DCAP Group, Inc. appearing
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DCAP Group, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.














Holtz
      Rubenstein Reminick LLP


Holtz
      Rubenstein Reminick LLP


Melville,
      New York


March
      28,
      2007
No. 10-10853.

#### Myra Catherine Solliday, Petitioner v. E. Lavon Spence.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 181,

181 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6090.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 206.
No. 10-7632.

#### Archer Bryant Hudson, Jr., Petitioner v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1062,

178 L. Ed. 2d 869,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 923.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Comments
No. 11-5105.

#### Melvin L. Laird, Petitioner v. William Mackay, et al.

565 U.S. 890, 132 S. Ct. 269,

181 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5387.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**DoD Supply Discrepancy Reporting (SDR) Committee Meeting 08-1**

**March 25-26, 2008: HQC 3801 (beginning at 10:00 am first day)March 27, 2008:  HQC 1101 (if needed)**
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.5. APPENDIX 3.5**

**INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT – INCREASE OR DECREASE (LOGISTICS TRANSFER/ CAPITALIZATION/DECAPITALIZATION)**

## 

2

**AP3.5-**

AP3.5-1

APPENDIX 3.5
No. 11-60.

#### Gunder’s Auto Center, Petitioner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 247,

181 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5449.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 819.