alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-10975.

#### James Brown, Petitioner v. City of Detroit, Michigan, et al.

565 U.S. 860, 132 S. Ct. 197,

181 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6069.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Client: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC - Uncle Sam Plant

Subject: BART Cost Effectiveness Calculation

Signature:Todd Higginbotham Emissions Unit: Phosphate Rock Transfer, Storage and Handling Operations Emissions Unit ID: EPN P-Rock Control Technology: Baghouse Final: September 3, 2015

1. Design Parameters Flow Rate: 500-1,000 ft3/min Estimate Fan Size: 2.5 hp Estimate Capacity Factor (CF): 1.0 Assumed continuous operation Baghouse PM Removal Efficiency (ηPM): 99% Assumed control efficiency Baseline PM Emission Rate (Baseline): 0.80 tpy (Highest potential to emit emission rate for a phosphate rock conveyor belt transfer point) PMEmissions Reduction: 0.79 tpy = Baseline * ηPM

2. Economic Factors Equipment Life (n): 30 years Annual Interest Rate (I): 7.00% Capital Recovery Factor (CRF): 0.081 = (I * (1 + I)^n) / ((1 + I)^n - 1)

Cost of Electricity: 0.07 $/kW

3. Total Capital Investment (TCI) $29,358 = DC + IC Direct Capital Costs (DC): $20,532 = PEC + Install Total Purchased Equipment Cost (PEC): $11,800 = BH + Instr + ST + Fr Baghouse and Ancillary Equipment (BH): $10,000 Conservative estimate

Instrumentation (Instr): $1,000 = 0.1 * BH (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45) Sales Tax (ST): $300 = 0.03 * BH (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45) Freight (Fr): $500 = 0.05 * BH (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45) Total Purchased Equipment Installation (Install): $8,732 = 0.74 * PEC (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45)

Indirect Capital Costs (IC): $8,826 = CE + E&S + Contract + SU + PC Construction Expenses (CE) $2,360 = 0.20 * PEC (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45) Engineering and Supervision (E&S) $1,180 = 0.10 * PEC (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45) Contractor Fees (Contract) $1,180 = 0.10 * PEC (USEPA 2002, Section 6, Ch. 1, page 1-45)

Start-up (SU) $1,027 = 0.05 * DC Project Contingency (PC) $3,080 = 0.15 * DC

4. Total Annual Cost (TAC) $6,151 = DAC + IAC Direct Annual Costs (DAC): $3,198 = OL & Mat + Maint + Elec + Waste Operating Labor and Materials (OL & Mat): $1,468 = 0.05 * TCI

Maintenance (Maint): $587 = 0.02 * TCI Electricity (Elec): $1,143 = Fan hp * 745.7 W/hp * 8,760 hr/yr * 1 kW/1,000 W * $/kW
Waste Disposal (Waste): $0 (Conservatively assumed to be 0)

Indirect Annual Costs (IAC): $2,953 = TIA + CR Taxes/Insurance/Administration (TIA): $587 = 0.02 * TCI

Capital Recovery (CR): $2,366 = TCI * CRF

5. Cost Effectiveness

Cost Effectiveness of Control Technology: 7,796 $/ton = TAC / Emissions Reduction, in tpy

1 of 1
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

March 24, 2016

Re: Amendment to Exemption 13850 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the 	 	

	 	 FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in 	 	

	 	 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2532.

Dear Sir or Madam;

Aether Films Inc. was issued an Exemption numbered 13850 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the 

purpose of conducting closed-set filming for the motion picture and television industry. Aether 

Films Inc. hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow 3 additional models of 

unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the exemption, and 

also allow the use of all their UAS systems for Aerial Data Collection. 

Aether Films Inc. wishes to operate three additional unmanned aerial systems (Freefly Alta 8, DJI 

Inspire 1 Pro and a Freefly Alta 8) under the same terms and conditions contained in the 

Exemption. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the 

exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for the addition of 3 similar models of 

unmanned aerial vehicle and to allow Aerial Data Collection, Aether Filsm Inc. respectfully 

submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal 

Register for the requested amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely, 

Kyle Bullington 

Director of Marketing and Content Strategy 

Aether Films Inc.

650-455-7752

737 Bryant St., Palo Alto, CA, 94301
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM "LOM MEDICAL
INTERNATIONAL INC." AUG 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,089,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,100,705
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,236,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    301,727
<COMMON>                                     2,595,931
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,236,217
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               193,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)



</TABLE>
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.10. APPENDIX 3.10**

**DUE-IN –PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT SOURCE**

## 

2

**AP3.10-**

AP3.10-1

APPENDIX 3.10
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Claires Stores, Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Marla Schaefer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 USC. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Marla SchaeferMarla SchaeferCo-Chief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2005
No. 10-7976.

#### Abram Josiah Sprenger, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1030,

178 L. Ed. 2d 851,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 618.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 625 F.3d 1305.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gregory J. Fisher, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ElkCorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;  b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: September 10, 2004
    
    By
    
    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andController
### Month Coal Delivered Tons Fuel Type State of Origin County of

Origin Coal Seam Fuel Shipment Method Configuration

ID January 28,664 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B February 85,481 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B March 43,418 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B April 28,486 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B May 43,371 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B June 29,116 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B July 44,026 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B August 43,725 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B September 58,369 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B October 57,825 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B November 57,972 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B December 27,675 Subbituminous Montana Big Horn Anderson-Dietz Train U1B & U2B 

### SRP Coronado Generating Station Spring Creek Mine Coal Data by Month for 2009

### Month Coal Delivered Tons Fuel Type State of Origin County of

Origin Coal Seam Fuel Shipment Method Configuration

ID January 273,810 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B February 302,299 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B March 346,728 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B April 320,127 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B May 232,864 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B June 189,264 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B July 290,707 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B August 218,747 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B September 231,563 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B October 276,977 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B November 201,870 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B December 129,123 Subbituminous Wyoming Campbell Middle Wyodak Train U1B & U2B 

### SRP Coronado Generating Station Jacobs Ranch/ East Thunder Mine Coal Data by Month for 2009
No. 10-7516.

#### Darrell K. Anderson, Petitioner v. Tennessee.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 947,

178 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 191.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
ApprovedDLMS Change 107

Revised Federal IC 861 

Receiving Advice/Acceptance Certificate for WAWF

1. ORIGINATOR: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO), Ellen 

Hilert, DLA J-673, 703-767-0676 (DSN 427), Ellen.Hilert@dla.mil

a. Service/Agency: DLMSO

b. Point of Contact: Lissa Henderson-Lucht 

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Contract Administration (WAWF)

3. REFERENCE: 

a. Wide Area Work Flow Home Page at https://rmb.ogden.disa.mil/

4. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Revised Federal IC 861 for WAWF Receiving Advice/Acceptance 

Certificate

b. Description of Change: This revision updates the 861 Federal IC by adding 

qualifier “CA” Cost Allocation Reference. WAWF uses qualifier CA in the 810C and 

810V transaction sets to identify the Standard Document Number (SDN). This change 

impacts the Federal IC; there is no applicable DLMS Supplement available.

c. Procedures: Revise IC (004030F861_2) as follows:

Location Revision Reason

1 2/REF01/0700 Add qualifier CA Cost Allocation Reference.

Note: Use to identify the Standard Document Number.

This qualifier is added 

for consistency with 

other WAWF 

transaction sets.

5. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Consistency with all WAWF transactions sets

b. Disadvantages: None known. Alternative mapping: 856, 2/REF01/150 Qualifier 

93, Funds Authorization – populates SDN field in WAWF.

6. IMPACT: Publications: Federal IC/DLMS; WAWF Guideline for 861
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FAR/FAS FORMAT**

**REPLY TO REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF NON-FUEL BILLING ANDRESPONSE TO FOLLOW-UP ON REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF NON-FUEL BILLING**

98

	APPENDIX 3.2

1
**DOD LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS**

**FINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE (FPRC) MEETING**

**AGENDA**

***Meeting Goal: Share, Learn and Identify Areas for Process Improvement as a Team***

Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065803
<NAME>                        ORANGE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,095
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,095
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       206
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,095
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,582)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
No. 10-10890.

#### Sandy Martin Cook, Petitioner v. West Virginia.

565 U.S. 855, 132 S. Ct. 186,

181 L. Ed. 2d 95,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6599.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

Same case below, 228 W. Va. 563, 723 S.E.2d 388.
EXHIBIT G

Performance criteria for FY 1999 - FY 2001 cycle include the
following: Aggregate Income, defined as the targeted income, before
taxes and extraordinary items1, for the entire three-year period, as
shown in the table below.
Performance goals and amounts funding the payout pool include the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

        <S>                                 <C>                              <C>

         Performance Level                    Aggregate Income               % of Net Earnings to Pool
            Below Target                          Below $                         0%
               Target                                $                            .83% of earnings
            Above Target                           Above$                         .83% of earnings

</TABLE>




During the FY 1999 - FY 2001 cycle, Farmland Industries, Inc. must return to its
members at least $    in cash(2), or no payout will occur under this plan.

     (1)The Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Executive Officer must approve
     the classification of any item as "extraordinary".
     Transactions deemed as "extraordinary" and therefore excluded
     in the determination of income for variable compensation
     include:
     
     . The punitive portion of litigation results in favor of or
       against Farmland, excluding redemptive payments on normal business
       matter where the intent is to substantially restore net
       income to where it would have been had the incident not
       occurred.
     . Non-recurring (one-time) adjustment to income or expense
       such as the gain from settlement of the retirement plan or a 
       write-down of a major fixed asset.
     . The gain or loss on the disposal of a major asset or a group
       of assets.
     . The impact of adjustments resulting from LIFO inventory
       computations or reserves.
     . Other items as approved.
     Specific requests by an operating unit for treatment of an
     item as "extraordinary" must be approved by the Senior
     Management representative before review by the Chief Financial
     Officer and the Chief Executive Officer.
     <F2>
     Cash Returned to Members includes cash patronage, equity
     redemptions, additional equity redemptions due to tax savings
     on net operating loses (NOL), ownership retirements, capital
     credits, preferred stock dividends and preferred stock
     redemption and Cooperative Finance Company cash patronage
     refund.
     
     The attached Management Long Term Incentive Plan was approved
     by the Board of Directors at its meeting on August 26, 1993.
     
      Any Subsequent changes to the plan or to the individual
      participation within the plan will occur as outlined within 
      the document.





                      H.D. Cleberg, President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015213EN.01001202.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/12

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — Enercon GmbH v Gamesa Eólica SL, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-35/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Appeal brought by an ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ which did not lodge a response before the General Court - Not an intervener before the General Court - Appeal manifestly inadmissible))

(2015/C 213/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Enercon GmbH (represented by: J. Eberhardt, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Gamesa Eólica SL (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, abogado), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2) | Enercon GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gamesa Eólica SL. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Enercon GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gamesa Eólica SL.

| 3) | The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Fab Industries, Inc.
New York, New York



         We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the Prospectus
constituting  a part of the  Registration  Statement  on Form S-8 filed June 28,
1993,  the  Registration  Statement  on Form S-3 filed  January 31, 1992 and the
Registration  Statement  on Form S-8  filed  June 9,  1989 of our  report  dated
February 9, 1996 relating to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule
of Fab  Industries,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  appearing in the  Company's  Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 2, 1995.

         We also consent to the  reference to us under the caption  "experts" in
the Prospectus forming a part of such Registration Statements.




                                                    /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

                                                    BDO SEIDMAN, LLP




New York, New York
February 26, 1996
No. 10-10783.

#### Larry Wright, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 171,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6076.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 770.