T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T K EV I N M A Y S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. JO D Y M U N D E L L ; D U S T IN H I BBA RRD ; LEW I STO N CI TY O F, I DA HO ; J OH N D OES 1 - V; DA LE BU TTREY ; STEV E LU TES; J A CK M CG EE; RI CK SM I TH ; G A BE R I C HA R DS ON ; J AC L YN MAR T I N; J AMI E R OME R ; J OD Y B R OWN; J A CO B G U N TER, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 35649 D. C. No . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 5 5 2 - EJ LC WD ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

I da ho E dw a r d J . L odge , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry7, 2013

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: F IS H E R , G O U L D , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED FEB 20 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI n th e s a m e c o m p la in t, M a y s b r o u g h t ad is tin c t e x c e s s iv e f o r c e c la im 1 a g a in s t s e v e r a l p o lic e o f f ic e r s . T h a t c la im w e n t to tr ia l a n dis n o t a t is s u e in th is appeal . W i th res pectt o h i s del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence cl ai m , M ay s a l so nam ed N ez P e r c e C o u n ty , S h e r if

f D a le B u ttr e y , a n dL ie u te n a n t J a c kM c G e e a s d e f e n d a n ts unde rthe or i e s of

m uni c i pa l a nd s upe rvi s oryl i abi l i ty . M a y s doe s notappe a l the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s gr a ntof

s um m a ryj udgm e ntw i th r e s pe c tt o thos e de f e nda nt s . T he re m ai ni ng defe nd ant s, R i ck S m i th, G abe R i char dson , Ja cl yn M art i n, Jam i e R om er , J o d yB r o w n , a n dJ a c o b G u n te r , a r e r e f e rr e dto c o lle c tiv e lya s th e “d e p u tie s .” P age 2 of 4 P l ai nt i ff -A pp el l antK evi n M ay s app ea l s the di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof sum m ary ju d g m e n t to th e d e f

e n d a n t d e p u tie s in M a y s ’s § 1 9 8 3 d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e c la im a ga i ns tde put i e s of

the N e z P e r c e C ountyJ a i l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 1 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ag r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t. T

oguc hiv . Chung , 391 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . “V ie w in g th e e v id e n c e in th e lig h t m o s t f a v o r ab le t o the no nm ov i ng party, w e m ustdet erm i ne w hether there ar e any genu i ne i ss ues of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta nd w he the rthe di s tr i c tc ourtc orr e c t l yappl i e d the r e l e va nt s u b s ta n tiv e la w .” I

d. ( quot i ng L e e v e rv . Ca rs o n C ity , 36 0 F . 3d 10 14 , 10 17 (9th C i r. 20 04 )) . A l tho ug h the E i gh th A m endm entprot ec t s c on vi ct ed pri soners fr om cruel a n du n u s u a l p u n is h m e n t, th e F o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n t D u e P r o c e s s C lau s e p r o te c ts p r e tr ia l d e ta in e e s , s u c h a s M a y s , f r o m m is tr e a tm e n t. B e ll v . W o lfis h , 441 U . S . 520, 535- 37 & n. 16 ( 1979) . H ow e ve r , w e appl ythe s a m e E i ghth A m e ndm e nt

“ de l i be r a t e i ndi f

f e r e nc e ” s t a nda r d t o ourF ourt e e nth A m e ndm e nta na l y s i s of theP age 3 of 4

tr e a tm e n t o f

p r e tr ia l d e ta in e e s . C lo u th ie rv . Cn ty . o f C o n tr a C o s ta , 591 F . 3d 1232, 1 2 4 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . Iti s w el l -e st abl i shed thatpri soners have a ri gh tt o adequ at e m edi ca l care . Es te lle v . G a m b le , 4 2 9 U .S . 9 7 , 1 0 3 ( 1 9 7 6 ) . B u t n o t e v e ryc la im o f in a d e q u a te m ed i cal care st at es a cl ai m fo r rel i ef u n d er th e E i g h th A m en d m en t , o r, i n th e case o f p r e tr ia l d e ta in e e s , th e F o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n t. I d. a t105. I n or de rt o e s t abl i s h a c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n , ap r is o n e rm u s t e s tab lis h th a t a n o f f ic ia l a c te dw ith

“ del i bera t e i nd i ff

er ence t o [a] se ri ou s m edi ca l need[] . ” I d. a t 1 0 4 . D e lib e r a te i nd i ff er ence i s ast at e of m i nd “ m ore bl am ew orthy than n egl i gence. ” Farm erv. B r e nnan , 5 1 1 U .S . 8 2 5 , 8 3 5 ( 1 9 9 4 ) . A n o f f ic ia l is o n lyd e lib e r a te lyin d if f e r e n t if he i s “ aw ar e of f

ac t s f rom w hi ch the i nfer ence coul d b e draw n thata s ub st ant i al r is ko f s e r io u s h a rm e x is ts , . . . d r a w [ s ] th e in f e r e n c e ,” a n df

a ils to a d e q u a te ly r e s pond t o tha tne e d. Id . a t 8 3 7 , 8 4 4 . M ay s has ra i se d a tri abl e i ss ue of fa ctas t o w hether he had a se ri ou s m edi ca l ne e d. H e ha s f

a i l e d, how e ve r , t o r a i s e atr i abl e i s s ue of f a c ta s t o w he the rthe de put i e s r e s ponde d t o tha tm e di c a l ne e d w i th de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e . T o r i s e t o the l evel of a c on st i tut i on al vi ol at i on , an offi ci al ’ s r es po nse t o a se ri ou s m edi ca l need m u s t b e m o r e th a n n e g lig e n t. Es te lle , 42 9 U . S . at10 6. A pri soner m ustshow that th e o ffi ci al s ch o se a co u rse o f co n d u ct“ i n co n sci o u s d i sreg ardo f an ex cessi v e ri skP age 4 of 4

t o [the pri soner’ s] heal th. ” T oguc hi , 391 F . 3d a t1058 ( quot i ng Jack son v. McIn to sh , 90 F . 3d 33 0, 33 2 (9th C i r. 19 96 )) (a l t er at i on i n o ri gi nal ) ( i nt ernal quot a t i on m a rks om i tt e d) . N othi ng i n the r e c or d s upport s af i ndi ng tha tthe d ep u t i es resp o n d edt o M ays’ s co n d i t i o n w i th d el i b erat e i n d i fferen ce. A ft er M ays e xhi bi t e d s y m pt om s of

a l c ohol w i thdr a w a l , he w a s t a ke n t o the hos pi t a l w he r e he w a s obs e rve d a nd tr e a t e d byaphy s i c i a n. T he doc t orauthor i z e d hi s r e turn t o the coun ty j ai l . U po n h i s r eturn t o j ai l , the depu t i es cl osel y m on i t ored M ay s and , w hen nece ss ary, re stra i ned h i m t o p re venthi m fr om i nj uri ng hi m se l f. N o rea sonabl e tri er o f f a c t c o u ldc o n c lu d e th a t th e s e a c tio n s b yth e d e p u tie s c o n s titu te dd e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e . AF F I RME D.