alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

BAYOUAUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC D/B/ ABAYOU CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAMAND BAYOU STATE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC D/B/A BAYOU FORD VERSUS NEWYORK MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

### HUB INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST LIMITED D/B/

A

### HUB INTERNATIONAL GULF SOUTH, DAVID W. ALLIGOOD, JANETTE CAMPBELL, AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 2024 CW 0322 Page 1 of2



### APRIL 11, 2024

In Re: Hub International Midwest Limited D/B/ A Hub International Gulf South, David W. Alligood, and Lanette Campbell, applying for supervisorywrits, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 712867.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.

STAY DENIED; WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The portion of the district court's April 11, 2024 judgment which granted plaintiffs' motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding the fault of New York Marine and General Insurance Company or Risk Point Underwriting Managers, LLC is reversed in part. Louisiana Civil Code article 2323 provides, in part, that in any action for damages where a person suffers injuryor loss, the degree or percentage of fault of all persons causing or contributing to the injury or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, which applies to any claim for recovery of damages for injury or loss asserted under any law or legal doctrine or theory of liability, regardless of the basis of liability. The district court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the fault of New York Marine and General Insurance Company or Risk Point Underwriting Managers, LLC, and the motion in limine is denied with regard to such evidence. However, defendants are not entitled to introduce evidence as to amounts received by plaintiffs from its insurer pursuant to the collateral source rule. See Prest v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 2012- 0513 ( La. 12/4/12), 125 So.3d 1079. Accordingly, the writ is denied, in part, to the extent the judgment excludes evidence as toamounts received byplaintiffs from its insurer.

McClendon, J., concurs. JEW MRT AHP

Greene, J., concurs in partanddissents in part. with the denial ofthe stay but dissent and would I concur deny the

# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

2024 CW 0322 Page 2 of 2

writ. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per curiam), are not met.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,797
<SECURITIES>                                    18,132
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,556
<ALLOWANCES>                                       327
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,423
<PP&E>                                           5,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,213
<SALES>                                         18,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,364
<CGS>                                            4,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,926
<INCOME-TAX>                                       713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,213
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
No. 11-5492.

#### Siegfried G. Christman, et ux., Petitioners v. Thomas J. Walsh, Jr., Judge, Circuit Court of Florida, St. Lucie County, et al.

565 U.S. 910, 132 S. Ct. 319,

181 L. Ed. 2d 197,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5911.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 841.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Renegotiation Board Interest Rate; Prompt Payment Interest Rate; 
Contract Disputes Act

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning July 1, 1998 and ending on December 
31, 1998 the prompt payment interest rate is 6% (6) per centum per 
annum.

DATES: This notice announces the interest rate applicable for the July 
1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 period.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Sandra K. Jones, Team 
Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office of Public Debt Accounting, 
Bureau of the Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328. A 
copy of this Notice will be made available for downloading from the 
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Brown, Debt Accounting 
Branch Manager, Office of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of the Public 
Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328, (304) 480-5171, Sandra K. 
Jones, Team Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office of Public Debt 
Accounting, Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 480-5174, Edward C. 
Gronseth, Deputy Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Bureau of 
the Public Debt, (304) 480-5192, or Brenda L. Hoffman, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Chief Counsel, Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 
480-5198.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Although the Renegotiation Board is no 
longer in existence, other Federal Agencies are required to use 
interest rates computed under the criteria established by the 
Renegotiation Act of 1971 Sec. 2, Pub. L. 92-41, 85 Stat. 97. For 
example, the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 Sec. 12, Pub. L. 95-563, 92 
Stat. 2389 and the Prompt Payment Act of 1982 Sec. 2, Pub. L. 97-177, 
96 Stat. 85 provide for the calculation of interest due on claims at a 
rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 
3902(a).
    Therefore, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the above 
mentioned sections, the Secretary of the Treasury has determined that 
the rate of interest applicable for the purpose of said sections, for 
the period beginning July 1, 1998 and ending on December 31, 1998, is 6 
per centum per annum.

    Dated: June 25, 1998.
Donald V. Hammond,
Acting Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17475 Filed 6-26-98; 12:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 7, 2014 517730 

________________________________

In the Matter of DANIEL 

FELDER,

Appellant,

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner 

 of Corrections and 

 Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 9, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Daniel Felder, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.),

entered October 16, 2013 in Clinton County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding

petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in four misbehavior reports with

violating numerous prison disciplinary rules as a result of him

conspiring to assault a prison employee and becoming violent when

several correction officers attempted to restrain him. Following

a disciplinary hearing on all four reports, petitioner was found

guilty of assaulting staff (four counts), violent conduct (four

counts), creating a disturbance (two counts), refusing a direct

order, refusing a search, and being out of place. The
-2- 517730 

determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this

CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Supreme Court dismissed the

petition, and petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Petitioner questions the Hearing Officer's

failure to provide photographs and medical reports of the injured

correction officers after the officers had testified, but any

error in that regard was harmless given that the officers

testified to their injuries and the record contained overwhelming

evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Martin v Fischer,

98 AD3d 774, 775 [2012]; Matter of Brown v Goord, 300 AD2d 777,

777 [2002]). Petitioner also asserts that he was deprived of the

opportunity to review a to/from memorandum purportedly authored

by one of the officers but, inasmuch as the record reveals that

said document does not exist, the Hearing Officer cannot be

faulted for failing to provide it (see Matter of Martin v

Fischer, 109 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2013]). Petitioner's remaining

arguments, to the extent they are properly preserved for our

review, have been examined and found to lack merit.

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147180

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147180

COA: 300875

Macomb CC: 2009-001114-FC

KENNETH RAY WITHERSPOON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 10-1492.

#### Mario Martinez, Petitioner v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.

565 U.S. 824, 132 S. Ct. 114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 38,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5409.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, denied.

*39Same case below, 320 S.W.3d 377.
Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Enrollee Decision Period

The Office of Personnel Management has established an immediate Enrollee Decision Period for Federal 

Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP) enrollees. The decision period will run until November 9, 

2023. The plan administrator, Long Term Care Partners, LLC (LTCP) sent each current enrollee a letter 

stating an increase was likely to occur.

Current enrollees will receive personalized options letters in mid-September, which will outline options to 

reduce certain components and or levels of care that would allow them to either accept or mitigate the 

impact of the premium increase. In addition, all current enrollees will have the choice of a paid-up, limited 

benefit, with no future premiums due. 

The premium increase does not affect the FLTCIP 3.0 enrollees. However, enrollees in FLTCIP 1.0, 

FLTCIP 2.0 and FLTCIP Alternative Insurance Program (AIP) and those who are not currently eligible or 

are awaiting a decision on a pending claim, will be subject to the premium increase. 

All current enrollees have until November 9, 2023 to make a decision. If LTCP does not receive a 

decision by November 9, 2023, current enrollee’s premiums will increase effective January 1, 2024 and 

will remain the coverage rate with any applicable inflation increases. 

For additional questions and assistance please contact LTCFEDSInfo@ltcpartners.com.

Questions? Contact: dodhra.mc
No. 10-7401.

#### Andrew Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1115, 131 S. Ct. 850,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9703.

178 L. Ed. 2d 569,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 233.
|   | (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st      Source. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By |   /s/ LARRY E.      LENTYCH                         |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Larry      E. Lentych, Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
No. 10-1348.

#### Kathleen Johnson Parnell, Petitioner v. The Bank of New York, Acting Solely in Its Capacity as Trustee for EQCC Trust 2001-2.

565 U.S. 817, 132 S. Ct. 98,

181 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6647.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Same case below, 56 So. 3d 160.
No. 11-5458.

#### Latanicia Rogers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 314,

181 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5746.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 315.
No. 11-62.

#### Rosalind E. Cazares and Adrian Jefferson, Petitioners v. Pamela Cosby.

565 U.S. 881, 132 S. Ct. 247,

181 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5431,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.

Same case below, 2010 UT App 269.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service
[TB-98-07]


Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee--Notice of Committee 
Renewal

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Committee Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of Agriculture has 
renewed the Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee for an additional 
period of 2 years.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John P. Duncan III, Deputy 
Administrator, Tobacco Programs, AMS, USDA, 300 12th Street, S.W., Room 
502 Annex Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456, (202) 
205-0567.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee, which reports to the 
Secretary through the Assistant Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory 
Programs, recommends opening dates and selling schedules for the flue-
cured marketing area which aid the Secretary in making an equitable 
apportionment and assignment of tobacco inspectors. The Committee 
consists of 39 members; 21 producer representatives, 10 warehouse 
representatives, and 8 buyer representatives, representing all segments 
of the flue-cured tobacco industry and meets at the call of the 
Secretary. The Secretary has determined that renewal of this Committee 
is in the public interest.
    To ensure that recommendations of the Committee take into account 
the needs of diverse groups served by the Department, membership should 
include, to the extent practicable, persons with demonstrated ability 
to represent minorities, women, and persons with disabilities.
    This notice is given in compliance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).

    Dated: July 13, 1998.
Reba Evans,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-19078 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,315-01

EX P ARTE JOHNATHAN JEROID JOH NSON, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1316114-A IN THE 232 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d guilty to posse ssion of a controlled substance and was sentenc ed to two year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due proce ss beca use af ter he enter ed his plea, the evidenc e in hi s case was tested and found not to contain any controlled substance or dang erous drug
. Although Applicant has discharg ed his sentenc e in thiscase , he allege s that he is suffe ring continuing conseque nces as a result of t his conviction. T h o s e

continuing conseque nces are sufficie nt to allow this Court to addre ss his claims. Ex parte Harrington , 310 S.W .3d 452, 456-57 (Te x . Crim. App. 2010). The pa rties have enter ed agree d finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, a nd the trial cour

t has deter mined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent choice
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Mable , 443 S.W .3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 131611401010 in the 232 District Court of n d Har ris County

is set aside. Copie s of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Ju s ti c e
–Co r r e c ti o n a l Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: J une 27, 2016 Do not publish
No. 10-10914.

#### Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 189,

181 L. Ed. 2d 97,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6288.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5041.

#### Chantay P. White, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 87,

181 L. Ed. 2d 18,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6660.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 11-5851.

#### David Hill, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 352,

181 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7063.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 217.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6). Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Cancer Institute, including consideration of personal qualifications 
and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute, Subcommittee A--Clinical Sciences and 
Epidemiology.
    Date: July 13, 1998.
    Open: 8:30 am to 9:20 am.
    Agenda: Call to order by Board Chair; presentation by NCI 
Director regarding the Bypass Budget 2001; and one concept review.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NCI, Board of Scientific 
Counselors, Bldg 31, ``C'' Wing, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 9:35 am to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NCI, Board of Scientific 
Counselors, Bldg 31, ``C'' Wing, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Judy A. Meitz, PhD, Executive Secretary, Office 
of Advisory Activities, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, 6130 Executive 
Boulevard/EPN--Room 609, Rockville, MD 20892-7410, 301/496-2378.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-18135 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FILED: Ju ly 3 , 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 19

- 4620 (L)

___________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

– Appellee

,

v.

RANDY BANKS

, a/k/a Dir t,

Defendant

– Appellant

.

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

The court amends its opinion filed June 1 2 , 2024, as follows:

On page 18, in the last paragraph, both references to “ months ’ impr isonment ”

are changed to “ years ’ imprisonment. ”

For the Court

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk USCA4 Appeal: 19-4826 Doc: 180 Filed: 07/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 1