alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                         Consent of Independent Auditor

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-33349, No. 033-65184 and No. 033-29219) and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 033-45468) of Fab Industries, Inc. and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 16, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Fab Industries, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 1, 2001.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
                                                ----------------------



Charlotte, North Carolina
February 28, 2002
DOMESTIC REVOLVING NOTE
  EMS Domestic Lender Credit Agreement Canadian Borrower
 
    EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Georgia corporationBy:
    /s/ Don T. ScartzName:Title:




---



##### 



DOMESTIC
REVOLVING NOTE
 EMS Domestic Lender Credit Agreement Canadian Borrower
     EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Georgia corporationBy:
    /s/ Don T. ScartzName:Title:




---



##### 



DOMESTIC
REVOLVING NOTE
 EMS Domestic
Lender Credit Agreement Canadian Borrower
     EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Georgia corporationBy:
    /s/ Don T. ScartzName:Title:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30512 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Garland D. Miller,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:07

- CR

- 50032

- 1

Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Garland D. Miller, former federal prisoner # 13658

- 035, appeals the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his postjudgment motion challenging his 2008 restitution order. Miller also moves for the appointment of counsel and the recusal of the district judge

.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  **47.5** , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 4, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30512 Document: 00515767020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2021No. 20

- 30512

2 By failing to challenge the district court’s decision that it lacked jurisdiction to modify Miller’s restitution order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, Miller has abandoned the issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993) ; Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty

. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Further, Miller articulates no basis for this court to grant relief. See Zimmerman v. Spears , 565 F.2d 310, 316 (5th Cir. 1977) ; see also In re McBryde , 117 F.3d 208, 220 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Arlt , 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978). **AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED**

. Case: 20-30512 Document: 00515767020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2021
No. 10-10683.

#### Rodney Perkins, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 158,

181 L. Ed. 2d 73,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6017.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
A15A2334.

#### MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL et al. v. MAIA.

(805 SE2d 635)

Decided September 27, 2017.

*Oliver Maner, Patrick T. O’Connor, Benjamin M. Perkins, Lauren E. H. Meadows; Ray C. Smith,*for appellants.

*Jones, Osteen & Jones, Billy N. Jones, Carl R. Varnedoe,*for appellee.

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

In *City of Richmond Hill v. Maia,*301 Ga. 257 (800 SE2d 573) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed Division 2 of our opinion in *Mayor and City Council of Richmond Hill v. Maia,*336 Ga. App. 555 (784 SE2d 894) (2016), holding that Appellee cannot demonstrate proximate cause and that “Appellants were entitled to summary judgment in their favor.” *City of Richmond Hill v. Maia,*301 Ga. at 262 (2). Accordingly, we vacate Division 2 of our opinion and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own in place of that division.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Dillard, C. J., Barnes, P. J., Ray, P. J., McMillian, Reese, and Bethel, JJ., concur.*
No. 10-1482.

#### Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 824, 132 S. Ct. 112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 38,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5236.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 1111.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-302 ) JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS ) COMMISSION; and GREGORY ) HOLDER, Circuit Court Judge, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed May 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Gregory G. Groger, Judge. Christina Paylan, M.D., pro se Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Caroline Johnson Levine, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,416]


Lynley Designs, Jefferson, Louisiana; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 6, 1998 in response to a petition which was 
filed on March 25, 1998 on behalf of workers at Lynley Designs, located 
in Jefferson, Louisiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 24th day of June 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-18581 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3184 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to increase the vehicle length limitation for truck tractor-lowboy trailer combinations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Mr. MOOLENAAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to increase the 

vehicle length limitation for truck tractor-lowboy trailer 

combinations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LENGTH LIMITATIONS. 

4 Section 31111 of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(8) LOWBOY TRAILER.—The term ‘lowboy 

9 trailer’ means a semitrailer with a depressed section 

10 between the hitch and the first rear axle.’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3184 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (H), by striking the 

4 period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(I) imposes a vehicle length limitation of 

7 less than 80 feet on a truck tractor-lowboy 

8 trailer combination with a front overhang of 

9 less than 4 feet and a rear overhang of less 

10 than 6 feet.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
****

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8. APPENDIX 8**

**FORMATS INDEX**

4

APPENDIX 3

AP8-1

APPENDIX 8
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 5, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to engage de novo 
through a joint venture subsidiary, DRH Mortgage, LLC, Corona, 
California, in residential mortgage lending activities, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 16, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19410 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19534]



[[Page 39075]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, August 31, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19534 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 11-5888.

#### Jaime Lujan-Alcala, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 355,

181 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6880.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 602.
Exhibit


 





EXTENSION AND CONFIRMATION AGREEMENT


 


Made this 15th day of December 2011 (the
"Effective Date") by and between Viral Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Marshall
C. Phelps, Jr. ("Consultant").


 


WHEREAS Company and Consultant are party to a Consulting
Agreement dated January 1, 2008 (the "Agreement") that they verbally agreed to extend for one year on or about each of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 as provided for in Section 1 therein, and are mutually desirous of memorializing
those extensions, and further desire to extend the Agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2012.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and lawful consideration
and of the mutual covenants contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived hereunder, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Consultant is owed and Company shall deliver a total of
400,000 shares of common stock of Company for services provided for the two years ending December 31, 2011.



		2.	The Term of the Consulting Agreement is hereby extended
until December 31, 2012.





		3.	All other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement,
including, without limitation, those in Exhibit A therein entitled "Viral Genetics Intellectual Property Agreement",
shall continue in full force and effect.





 


AGREED and entered into as of the date affixed hereof.


 


COMPANY:


VIRAL GENETICS, INC.


 


By /s/ Haig Keledjian                           


Duly Authorized Officer


 


CONSULTANT:


 


/s/ Marshall C. Phelps, Jr.                               


Marshall C. Phelps, Jr.
**Attachment**

**Action Item Tracker – SDR PRC 22-02 Meeting (November 14, 2022)**

**Current as of December 6, 2022**

SDR PRC 22-02 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/SDRPRC/

Page **4** of **5**
##### 



Exhibit 21
 JO-ANN STORES, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 State or Country of
    
    Percent owned byName
    
    Incorporation
    
    RegistrantJo-Ann Stores Supply Chain Management, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %FCA of Ohio, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %House of Fabrics, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Team Jo-Ann
Stores, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %Fabric World of Cleveland, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %Jo-Ann. Com, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Jo-Ann Stores Asia, Limited
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    100
    %
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51409 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN DUQUE-CONTRERAS, also known as Juan Dugue-Contreras, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-453-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Duque-Contreras appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Duque-Contreras contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 02-51409 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Duque-Contreras maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Duque-Contreras acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
17 19
Exhibit 10.32


 


ASSIGNMENT


 


AGREEMENT made this 28th day of October 2010 by and between
Viral Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Assignor"), and VG Energy, Inc., a California corporation, ("Assignee").


 


Recital


WHEREAS Assignor holds exclusive worldwide rights in all fields
of use to patents, patent applications, know-how and other intellectual property under a Metabolic Disruption Exclusive License
Agreement with the Regents of the University of Colorado dated November 22, 2009, (the "License").


 


AND WHEREAS Assignor is desirous of licensing a portion of the rights
under the License to Assignee, and Assignee is desirous of same.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


	1.		Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee, and Assignee accepts, its rights and obligations
under the License only with respect to the following patent and patent applications:





 


	Country	Application No.	Filing Date	Title	Grant No.	Grant Date
	US	09/823,886	3/30/2001	Compositions and Method for Regulating Metabolism in Plants	7,105,718	9/12/2006
	US	11/493,985	7/27/2006	
        Systems, Methods, and Compositions

        for Modifying

        the Metabolism of Plants and of Eukaryotic Microbes
	-	-
	US	12/574,694	10/6/2009	Compositions and Methods for Promoting Fatty Acid Production in Plants	-	-
	PCT	(to be inserted)	(to be inserted)	Compositions and Methods for Promoting Fatty Acid Production in Plants	-	-


 


	2.		This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.



	3.		This Agreement may be executed in facsimile or digital copy, and may exist in counterparts.



 


AGREED as of the date hereof.


 


	ASSIGNOR	ASSIGNEE
	/s/	/s/
	 	Duly authorized officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                     
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ KENNETH S. ORD                                  
|             |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF ENERGY CORPORATION OF AMERICAN ON JUNE 30, 2003



           NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      STATE OF INCORPORATION


A&W, LLC                                               West Virginia
Allegheny & Western Energy Corporation                 West Virginia
ECA Alliance, LLC                                      West Virginia
ECA Holdings, L.P.                                     Texas
ECA Partners, L.L.C.                                   West Virginia
Eastern American Energy Corporation                    West Virginia
Eastern Capital Corporation                            West Virginia
Eastern Exploration Corporation                        West Virginia
Eastern Marketing Corporation                          West Virginia
Eastern Pipeline Corporation                           West Virginia
Eastern Systems Corporation                            West Virginia
Natural Gas Transportation Company                     West Virginia
Westech Energy Corporation                             Colorado
Westech Energy New Zealand                             New Zealand
Westech Energy New Zealand, LLC                        Colorado


<PAGE>
No. 10-10272.

#### Kevin Joe Picotte, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 133,

181 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5834.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RYAN J. CONNELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4168 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 775.082(9)(a)(1)(q), 810.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2012); Ch. 74- 383, § 66, at 1256, Laws of Fla.; State v. Dehart, 913 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAIR GROUNDS CORP FOR THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,530
<PP&E>                                          55,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,525
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,144
<SALES>                                         28,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,785
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,364)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,273
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.09
        

</TABLE>