alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-615.

#### Luxpro Corporation, Petitioner v. Apple, Inc., fka Apple Computer, Inc.

562 U.S. 1110, 131 S. Ct. 838,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9727.

178 L. Ed. 2d 560,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 909.
No. 10-10509.

#### Theodore O. Wilson, Petitioner v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 148,

181 L. Ed. 2d 65,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6228.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of 

Himself and All Others Similarly

Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK

KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves

and All Others Similarly Situated;

CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of

Herself and All Others Similarly

Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff

in related case no. C-06-03467

MMC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132

and D.C. No.  CV-06-00672-VRW WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC.,

Intervenors,

v.

AT&T CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

AT&T, INC.,

Defendant,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Intervenor. 

11353
TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of 

Himself and All Others Similarly

Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK

KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves

and All Others Similarly Situated;

CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of No. 06-17137

Herself and All Others Similarly

D.C. No. Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff

in related case no. C-06-03467 CV-06-00672-VRW

MMC,  Northern District of

Plaintiffs-Appellees, California,

San Francisco

v.

ORDER

AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC.,

Defendants,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. 

Filed August 21, 2008

Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and

M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No.

110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain

jurisdiction over any further appeals.

11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A No. 2 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George Kazantzis, President (President and Principal Financial Officer) and Nicholas Pappas (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 5th day of April 2006.

/s/ George Kazantzis      Name: George Kazantzis      Title: President and Principal Financial Officer

/s/ Nicholas Pappas      Name: Nicholas Pappas      Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)
No. 11-5271.

#### Mark A. Gleason, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 290,

181 L. Ed. 2d 175,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5524,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 28, 1998, Chiragene, 
Inc., 7 Powder Horn Drive, Warren, New Jersey 07059, made application 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-Ethylamphetamine (1475)..................  I                          
2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine (7396)............  I                          
3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (7400).......  I                          
4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411)................  I                          
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II                         
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to 
supply their customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than September 8, 1998.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-18216 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
No. 11-5162.

#### Jeremy Heath Ned, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 276,

181 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5633.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 637 F.3d 562.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37103-37104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-261-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 457 and 
First Revised Sheet No. 458, with a proposed effective date of August 
1, 1998.
    National Fuel states that the purpose of this filing is to 
incorporate Version 1.2 of the GISB Standards by reference in 
compliance with Order No. 587-G, Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines.
    National Fuel states that it is serving copies of this filing with 
its firm customers and interested state commissions. National Fuel 
states that copies are being served on all interruptible customers as 
of the date of the filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 37104]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18189 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# OC

# OO

# WR
82

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

California

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $347.9 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 40,000

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 440,600

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $13,292 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $891.1 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $735.8 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $1,626.9 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 21%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$99.9 $124.9 $2.63 $3.28

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$52.8 $76.0 $1.39 $2.00

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $63.5 $101.6 $1.67 $2.67

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$21.6 $30.3 $0.57 $0.80

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$10.8 $15.1 $0.28 $0.40

TOTAL $248.6 $347.9 $6.54 $9.15

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
Help him fight measles with 

the most powerful defense. 

Vaccines. Defend him against 14 serious childhood diseases, like measles and whooping cough, 

with the safe, proven protection of vaccines. Giving him the recommended immunizations by 

age two is the best way to protect him. For more reasons to vaccinate, talk to your child’s doctor 

or go to http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines or call 1-800-CDC-INFO. 

Immunization. Power to Protect. 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/events/niiw/promotional/media/downloads/printad-superbaby-8x11-color.pdf

evergreen
Order entered January 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00888-CR

JOE LYNN WILLIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-56320-R

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 15, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On January 22, 2014, we received appellant’s brief, together 

with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the 

January 15, 2014 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the January 22, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed 

as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
No. 10-10281.

#### Mikal Wali Naji, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 833, 132 S. Ct. 133,

181 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5272.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5853.

#### Samuel Freeman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 352,

181 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6913.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 584.
No. 11-5678.

#### Derrick McGee, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 409,

181 L. Ed. 2d 267,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7269.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, denied.

Same case below, 409 Ill. App. 3d 1178, 377 Ill. Dec. 758, 2 N.E.3d 674.
No. 11-5484.

#### Ronnie Lee Owen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 910, 132 S. Ct. 318,

181 L. Ed. 2d 196,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5841.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 285.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3213 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3213

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 
    certain retirement plan contributions picked up by governmental 
                               employers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2019

     Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Burchett, Mr. 
  Fleischmann, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Kustoff of 
Tennessee, and Mr. John W. Rose of Tennessee) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 
    certain retirement plan contributions picked up by governmental 
                               employers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN RETIREMENT PLAN 
              CONTRIBUTIONS PICKED UP BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``For purposes of paragraph (1)'' and 
        inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--For purposes of paragraph (1)'', 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Treatment of elections between alternative 
                benefit formulas.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of 
                        subparagraph (A), a contribution shall not fail 
                        to be treated as picked up by an employing unit 
                        merely because the employee may make an 
                        irrevocable election between the application of 
                        two alternative benefit formulas involving the 
                        same or different levels of employee 
                        contributions.
                            ``(ii) Application to existing employees.--
                        Clause (i) shall be applied without regard to 
                        whether the employee is already covered by one 
                        of the benefit formulas referred to therein.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4377-FA-01]


Housing Counseling Program Announcement of Funding Award--FY 1998

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of funding award.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 102 (a)(4)(C) of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989, this announcement 
notifies the public of a funding decision made by the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development. Noncompetitive funding was provided 
under the Housing Counseling Program initiatives, for homebuyer 
education and counseling, targeted to potential first-time homebuyers. 
This announcement contains the name and address of the award winner and 
the amount of the award.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty Woodley, Director of Marketing 
and Outreach, Office of Single Family Housing, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410, 
Telephone (202) 708-0614, ext. 2307. Hearing- or speech-impaired 
individuals may access this number by calling the Federal Information 
Relay Service TTY at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Housing Counseling Program is authorized 
by section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 
U.S.C. 1701x).
    The objective of this grant is to promote first-time homeownership 
through homebuyer education and counseling to potential first-time 
homebuyers. The Congress of National Black Churches, Inc. (CNBC) is a 
coalition of eight major historically black denominations. Together, 
these denominations represent 65,000 churches and a membership of more 
than 19 million people. CNBC will facilitate delivery of homebuyer 
education and counseling through affiliate organizations in major 
cities throughout the country. Since 1996, HUD has been working in 
partnership with CNBC through the HOME-NOW program to address the lack 
of homeownership opportunities for families in underserved communities.
    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for the Housing 
Counseling Program is 14.169.
    In accordance with section 102 (a)(4)(C) of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (103 Stat. 1987, 42 
U.S.C. 3545), the Department is publishing the name, address, and 
amount of the award as follows:

Congress of National Black Churches, Inc., 1225 Eye Street, NW, Suite 
750, Washington, DC 20005.
Amount: $348,900.

    Dated: July 1, 1998.
Ira G. Peppercorn,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing, Deputy Federal Housing 
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 98-18469 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-27-P
No. 11-5633.

#### Alfonzo Taft, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 387,

181 L. Ed. 2d 243,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6358.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 208.
No. 11-5589.

#### Raymond E. Quigley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 915, 132 S. Ct. 331,

181 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5992.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

*207Same case below, 5 A.3d 22.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Ron Marshall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Claires Stores, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|             |  |  |  |                        
|------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|May 27, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ Ron Marshall       
|             |  |  |  | Ron Marshall           
|             |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### *State, Respondent, v. Kissler, Petitioner,*

No. 91795-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44589-1-II, October 28, 2014, 184 Wn. App. 1019. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 11-5172.

#### Dale Ilgen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 893, 132 S. Ct. 277,

181 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5432.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 728.
No. 10-11162.

#### George Marron, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

565 U.S. 870, 132 S. Ct. 223,

181 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6595.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT (21)

                                 
              CLAIRE'S STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




     Name                          State/Country of Incorporation

Claire's Boutiques, Inc.                     Delaware

CSL, Inc.                                    Delaware

CBI Distributing Corp.                       Delaware

RSI International Limited                    Hong Kong

Claire's Puerto Rico Corp.                   Delaware

Claire's Canada Corp.                        Delaware

Claire's Accessories UK, Ltd.                United Kingdom

Just Nikki, Inc.                             Delaware

Sassy Doo!, Inc.                             Delaware

                                             Lux Corp.     
                                             Washington

                                             Bijoux One Trading AG Switzerland

                                             Bijoux One AG Switzerland

                                             Bosco GmbH Germany

                                             Bijoux One Trading GesmbH Austria

                                             Modewaren Femina Handelsgesell - 
                                               Schaft m.b.H. Austria

                                             Modewaren Femina Handelsgesell - 
                                               Schaft m.b.H. & Co. KG Austria


<PAGE>
No. 09-1354.

#### Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1062,

178 L. Ed. 2d 863,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 954.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 179.