##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q



---

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended June 30, 2006

Commission file number: 0-25137



---

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)



---

State
of Incorporation: Delaware

I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.: 91-1608052

Address of principal executive offices: 18400 NE Union Hill Road

Redmond,
Washington 98052

Telephone number, including area code: 425-702-8808



---

Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer  x                    Non-accelerated filer ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ̈No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of July 31, 2006 was
36,221,847.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2006

INDEX



|                                                                                                 |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|                                                                                                 |  | Page
|PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                    |  |     
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)                                            |  |     
|                                                                                                 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 |  | 3   
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005                           |  | 4   
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 |  | 5   
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                       |  | 6   
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS    |  | 16  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK                               |  | 27  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES                                                                  |  | 27  
|                                                                                                 | 
|PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION                                                                       |  | 28  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS                                                                        |  | 28  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS                                                                            |  | 28  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION                                                                        |  | 37  
|                                                                                                 | 
|ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS                                                                                 |  | 37  
|                                                                                                 | 
|SIGNATURE                                                                                        |  | 38  

Concur®, Concur® Expense, and Cliqbook® Travel, among others, are registered trademarks and/or registered service marks of Concur or one of its subsidiaries, in the United States and other
countries. Other parties marks are the property of their respective owners and should be treated as such.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|------- | ---------------------------------

Concur Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)



|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                    |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, |        |   | Nine Months EndedJune 30, |  
|                                                    |  | 2006                       |        |   | 2005                      |   |        | 2006 |  |   | 2005   |  
|Revenues from services:                             |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Subscription services                               |  | $                          | 22,385 |   |                           | $ | 13,861 |      |  | $ | 56,790 |   |  | $ | 38,620 |  
|Consulting services and other                       |  |                            | 4,489  |   |                           |   | 4,747  |      |  |   | 12,863 |   |  |   | 13,589 |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total revenues                                      |  |                            | 26,874 |   |                           |   | 18,608 |      |  |   | 69,653 |   |  |   | 52,209 |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |  
|Expenses:                                           |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Cost of services                                    |  |                            | 10,153 |   |                           |   | 7,349  |      |  |   | 27,779 |   |  |   | 20,913 |  
|Sales and marketing                                 |  |                            | 6,067  |   |                           |   | 4,431  |      |  |   | 16,491 |   |  |   | 12,872 |  
|Systems development and programming                 |  |                            | 3,793  |   |                           |   | 2,168  |      |  |   | 9,057  |   |  |   | 7,050  |  
|General and administrative                          |  |                            | 3,546  |   |                           |   | 2,701  |      |  |   | 10,288 |   |  |   | 7,522  |  
|Amortization of intangible assets                   |  |                            | 706    |   |                           |   | 285    |      |  |   | 1,597  |   |  |   | 855    |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Total expenses                                      |  |                            | 24,265 |   |                           |   | 16,934 |      |  |   | 65,212 |   |  |   | 49,212 |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |  
|Income from operations                              |  |                            | 2,609  |   |                           |   | 1,674  |      |  |   | 4,441  |   |  |   | 2,997  |  
|Interest income                                     |  |                            | 130    |   |                           |   | 69     |      |  |   | 365    |   |  |   | 261    |  
|Interest expense                                    |  |                            | (369   | ) |                           |   | (1     | )    |  |   | (588   | ) |  |   | (5     | )
|Other income (expense), net                         |  |                            | 69     |   |                           |   | (14    | )    |  |   | (79    | ) |  |   | (25    | )
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Income before income tax                            |  |                            | 2,439  |   |                           |   | 1,728  |      |  |   | 4,139  |   |  |   | 3,228  |  
|Benefit from income tax                             |  |                            | 29,120 |   |                           |   |       |      |  |   | 29,000 |   |  |   |       |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Net income                                          |  | $                          | 31,559 |   |                           | $ | 1,728  |      |  | $ | 33,139 |   |  | $ | 3,228  |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |  
|Net income per share:                               |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                               |  | $                          | 0.88   |   |                           | $ | 0.05   |      |  | $ | 0.96   |   |  | $ | 0.10   |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                             |  | $                          | 0.79   |   |                           | $ | 0.05   |      |  | $ | 0.85   |   |  | $ | 0.09   |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Shares used in calculation of net income per share: |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                               |  |                            | 35,914 |   |                           |   | 32,629 |      |  |   | 34,695 |   |  |   | 32,870 |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                             |  |                            | 39,912 |   |                           |   | 35,867 |      |  |   | 38,908 |   |  |   | 36,340 |  
|                                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Concur Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | - | ----------------- | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                                                        |  | June 30,2006 |          |   | September 30,2005 |  
|Assets                                                                                                                  |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                         |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                               |  | $            | 17,093   |   |                   | $ | 16,202   |  
|Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,431 and $734                                                               |  |              | 19,518   |   |                   |   | 12,374   |  
|Prepaid expenses                                                                                                        |  |              | 2,335    |   |                   |   | 1,386    |  
|Deferred income taxes, net                                                                                              |  |              | 2,680    |   |                   |   |         |  
|Other current assets                                                                                                    |  |              | 5,337    |   |                   |   | 3,527    |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                    |  |              | 46,963   |   |                   |   | 33,489   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Property and equipment, net                                                                                             |  |              | 19,796   |   |                   |   | 15,021   |  
|Restricted cash                                                                                                         |  |              | 500      |   |                   |   | 500      |  
|Intangible assets, net of amortization                                                                                  |  |              | 10,693   |   |                   |   | 2,090    |  
|Goodwill                                                                                                                |  |              | 58,940   |   |                   |   | 3,704    |  
|Long term deferred income tax assets, net                                                                               |  |              | 26,405   |   |                   |   |         |  
|Deposits and other long-term assets                                                                                     |  |              | 7,164    |   |                   |   | 5,847    |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total assets                                                                                                            |  | $            | 170,461  |   |                   | $ | 60,651   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Liabilities and stockholders equity                                                                                    |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                    |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                        |  | $            | 1,942    |   |                   | $ | 1,447    |  
|Accrued compensation                                                                                                    |  |              | 4,813    |   |                   |   | 2,395    |  
|Other accrued liabilities                                                                                               |  |              | 6,527    |   |                   |   | 2,373    |  
|Current portion of long-term debt and short-term borrowings                                                             |  |              | 2,646    |   |                   |   |         |  
|Current portion of deferred rent                                                                                        |  |              | 182      |   |                   |   | 145      |  
|Current portion of deferred revenues                                                                                    |  |              | 17,527   |   |                   |   | 13,298   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                               |  |              | 33,637   |   |                   |   | 19,658   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Long-term debt, net of current portion                                                                                  |  |              | 14,220   |   |                   |   |         |  
|Long-term deferred rent, net of current portion                                                                         |  |              | 2,927    |   |                   |   | 3,050    |  
|Long-term deferred revenues, net of current portion                                                                     |  |              | 7,479    |   |                   |   | 7,251    |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                       |  |              | 58,263   |   |                   |   | 29,959   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)                                                                                  |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Stockholders equity:                                                                                                   |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share: Authorized shares  5,000; No shares issued or outstanding     |  |              |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Common stock, par value $0.001 per share: Authorized shares  60,000; Issued and outstanding shares  36,158 and
33,216 |  |              | 36       |   |                   |   | 33       |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                              |  |              | 283,350  |   |                   |   | 235,025  |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                                                                                  |  |              | 65       |   |                   |   | 27       |  
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                     |  |              | (171,253 | ) |                   |   | (204,393 | )
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                              |  |              | 112,198  |   |                   |   | 30,692   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                                                              |  | $            | 170,461  |   |                   | $ | 60,651   |  
|                                                                                                                        |  |              |          |   |                   |   |          |  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Concur Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, |         |   | Nine Months EndedJune 30, |  
|                                                                                 |  | 2006                       |         |   | 2005                      |   |        | 2006 |  |   | 2005    |  
|Operating activities:                                                            |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income                                                                       |  | $                          | 31,559  |   |                           |   | 1,728  |      |  | $ | 33,139  |   |  | $ | 3,228   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Amortization of intangible assets                                                |  |                            | 706     |   |                           |   | 285    |      |  |   | 1,597   |   |  |   | 855     |  
|Depreciation                                                                     |  |                            | 1,358   |   |                           |   | 833    |      |  |   | 3,676   |   |  |   | 2,075   |  
|Leasehold improvements received from a lessor                                    |  |                            |        |   |                           |   | 3,200  |      |  |   |        |   |  |   | 3,200   |  
|Provision for allowance for accounts receivable                                  |  |                            | 393     |   |                           |   | 224    |      |  |   | 1,382   |   |  |   | 446     |  
|Share-based compensation expense                                                 |  |                            | 1,474   |   |                           |   |       |      |  |   | 3,446   |   |  |   |        |  
|Reduction in deferred income tax valuation allowance                             |  |                            | (29,085 | ) |                           |   |       |      |  |   | (29,085 | ) |  |   |        |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                     |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Accounts receivable                                                              |  |                            | (171    | ) |                           |   | (601   | )    |  |   | (5,376  | ) |  |   | (1,853  | )
|Prepaid expenses, deposits, and other assets                                     |  |                            | (1,323  | ) |                           |   | (842   | )    |  |   | (3,927  | ) |  |   | (2,834  | )
|Accounts payable                                                                 |  |                            | (1,669  | ) |                           |   | 620    |      |  |   | 494     |   |  |   | 1,055   |  
|Accrued liabilities                                                              |  |                            | 720     |   |                           |   | (210   | )    |  |   | 113     |   |  |   | (1,248  | )
|Deferred revenues                                                                |  |                            | 795     |   |                           |   | 583    |      |  |   | 3,671   |   |  |   | 3,171   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                        |  |                            | 4,757   |   |                           |   | 5,820  |      |  |   | 8,904   |   |  |   | 8,095   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |  
|Investing activities:                                                            |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Acquisition of leasehold improvements                                            |  |                            |        |   |                           |   | (3,200 | )    |  |   |        |   |  |   | (3,200  | )
|Decrease in restricted cash                                                      |  |                            |        |   |                           |   | 50     |      |  |   |        |   |  |   | 50      |  
|Purchases of property and equipment                                              |  |                            | (2,773  | ) |                           |   | (3,014 | )    |  |   | (7,684  | ) |  |   | (7,697  | )
|Payments for acquisition, net of cash acquired                                   |  |                            | 608     |   |                           |   |       |      |  |   | (21,900 | ) |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                            |  |                            | (2,165  | ) |                           |   | (6,164 | )    |  |   | (29,584 | ) |  |   | (10,847 | )
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |  
|Financing activities:                                                            |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Proceeds from borrowings                                                         |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |       |      |  |   | 18,000  |   |  |   |        |  
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock from exercise of stock options            |  |                            | 1,469   |   |                           |   | 774    |      |  |   | 4,177   |   |  |   | 1,406   |  
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock purchase plan         |  |                            | 191     |   |                           |   | 767    |      |  |   | 605     |   |  |   | 1,546   |  
|Payments on repurchase of common stock                                           |  |                            |        |   |                           |   | (298   | )    |  |   |        |   |  |   | (8,987  | )
|Payments on borrowings and capital leases                                        |  |                            | (630    | ) |                           |   |       |      |  |   | (1,260  | ) |  |   | (205    | )
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                              |  |                            | 1,030   |   |                           |   | 1,243  |      |  |   | 21,522  |   |  |   | (6,240  | )
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents           |  |                            | 131     |   |                           |   | (96    | )    |  |   | 49      |   |  |   | 25      |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                             |  |                            | 3,753   |   |                           |   | 803    |      |  |   | 891     |   |  |   | (8,967  | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                 |  |                            | 13,340  |   |                           |   | 13,965 |      |  |   | 16,202  |   |  |   | 23,735  |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                       |  | $                          | 17,093  |   |                           | $ | 14,768 |      |  | $ | 17,093  |   |  | $ | 14,768  |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                                |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash paid for interest                                                           |  | $                          | 373     |   |                           | $ |       |      |  | $ | 484     |   |  | $ | 2       |  
|Stock & options issued in connection with acquisition                            |  | $                          |        |   |                           | $ |       |      |  | $ | 39,926  |   |  | $ |        |  
|                                                                                 |  |                            |         |   |                           |   |        |      |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2006

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Company

Concur Technologies, Inc. is a leading provider of business services and solutions that automate processes involved in the management of corporate
expenses. Our core purpose is to use innovation to help our customers drive down their costs associated with corporate expense management (CEM). Concurs integrated suite of on-demand CEM services includes Concur Expense Service for
managing the expense reporting process, Cliqbook Travel for corporate travel management, and Cliqbook Meeting for corporate meeting and group travel management. Our solutions are designed to automate and streamline these business
processes, reduce operating costs, improve internal controls, and empower businesses to apply greater insight to their spending patterns through comprehensive analytics. We provide our services through flexible subscription services and other
delivery models, and market and sell our solutions worldwide through a direct sales organization as well as through indirect distribution channels.

Throughout these financial statements Concur Technologies, Inc. is referred to as Concur, we, us, and our.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The financial information as of June 30, 2006, and for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is unaudited, but includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such dates and
our results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The balance sheet information at September 30, 2005 has been derived from
our audited financial statements at that date but, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. Operating results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. The financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 included in Concurs 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Segment Information

We operate in and report on one segment (Corporate Expense Management services) based upon the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Concur and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions affecting the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on our financial statements and accompanying notes. Examples of
estimates and assumptions include the determination of certain provisions, including allowances for accounts receivable, product warranties, estimating useful lives of property and equipment, valuing and estimating useful lives of intangible assets,
valuing assets and liabilities acquired through business combinations, deferring certain revenues and costs, estimating expected lives of customer relationships, estimating share-based payments, and estimating tax valuation allowances.

Revenue Recognition Policy

We recognize revenues
in accordance with accounting standards for software and service companies including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP
97-2), as amended by SOP 98-9, the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-3, Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements that Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another
Entitys Hardware, the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 03-5, Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software (EITF 03-5), SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 104, Revenue Recognition, SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and related interpretations, including AICPA Technical Practice Aids.

We generate our revenues from the delivery of subscription services (which include maintenance services), consulting services, and to a lesser degree the
sale of software licenses.

We recognize revenue when:



| |  |  | evidence of an arrangement exists;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | delivery has occurred;
| | - |  | ----------------------



| |  |  | the fees are fixed or determinable; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | collection is considered probable.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------

If collection is not
considered probable, we recognize revenues when the fees are collected. If the fees are not fixed or determinable, we recognize revenues as payments become due from the customer. If non-standard acceptance periods or non-standard performance
criteria are required, we recognize revenue upon the expiration of the acceptance period or satisfaction of the acceptance/performance criteria, as applicable.

In contractual arrangements that include the provision of multiple elements, we apply the accounting guidance most applicable to the specific arrangement to determine how contract consideration should be measured and
allocated to the separate elements in the arrangement. Multiple element arrangements require the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. Generally, separate contracts with the same customer that are
entered into at or near the same time are presumed to have been negotiated together and, therefore, are accounted for as a single contractual arrangement in determining how contract consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate
elements in the arrangement. Typically, we measure and allocate the total arrangement fee among each of the elements based on their fair value or, if necessary, vendor-specific objective evidence of their fair value (VSOE). VSOE is
determined by the price charged when an element is sold separately or, in the case of an element not yet sold separately, the price set by authorized management if it is probable that the price, once established, will not change prior to separate
market introduction.

Subscription Revenues:

Our subscription revenues are typically recognized monthly as the service is provided to the customer and consist of:



| |  |  | monthly fees paid for subscription services;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amortization of related set-up fees;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | amortization of fees paid for software maintenance services under software license arrangements; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the amortized portion of the related license and consulting fees in certain multiple element subscription arrangements where VSOE does not exist for an undelivered subscription
element.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Set-up fees paid by customers in connection with subscription services, as well as the associated direct and
incremental costs, such as labor and commissions, are deferred and recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, which generally range from two to five years, or the expected lives of the customer relationships. If we launch new
subscription service offerings, we use the contractual lives as the best estimate of the expected lives of the customer relationships.

Software maintenance services include technical support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades and enhancements on a when-and-if available basis. Fees for software maintenance services are typically billed annually in advance of
performance of the services with provisions for subsequent automatic annual renewals. We defer the related revenues and recognize them ratably over the respective maintenance terms, which typically are one year.

Subscription revenues are adjusted for estimated sales allowances, which are based on our historical experience, including a review of our experience
related to price adjustments and sales credits issued.

Consulting and Other Revenues:

Consulting revenues consist of fees for professional services, which consist of system implementation and integration, planning, data conversion,
training, and documentation of procedures. Consulting service fees are typically billed and recognized as revenue on a time-and-materials basis. In some instances, we sell consulting services under milestone or fixed-fee contracts and, in such
cases, recognize consulting revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis. Consulting revenues are adjusted for estimated sales allowances, which are based on our historical experience, including a review of our experience related to price
adjustments and sales credits issued.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

In service arrangements that include consulting and subscription services, but not a license of our
software, we recognize consulting revenues as they are performed if the consulting services qualify as a separate unit of accounting within the arrangement. The consulting services qualify as a separate unit of accounting if they have value to the
customer on a stand-alone basis, there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the subscription services, and delivery or performance of the subscription services is considered probable and substantially within our control. We have
determined that, in our service arrangements of this type, the consulting services typically qualify as a separate unit of accounting and, accordingly, the consulting revenues are recognized as the services are performed. If the consulting services
do not qualify as a separate unit of accounting, the related revenues are combined with the subscription revenues, and recognized ratably over the subscription service period.

Other revenues consist of fees earned from, and allocable to, grants of licenses to use our products. We recognize license revenues when evidence of a
license arrangement exists, we have delivered the product, the amount of the transaction is fixed or determinable, collection is probable, and VSOE exists for any undelivered elements of the arrangement. Elements included in our multiple-element
software arrangements consist of various licensed products and services such as software maintenance services, consulting services, and subscription services.

In software license arrangements that include rights to multiple elements, we allocate the total arrangement fee among each of the elements using the residual method, under which revenues are allocated to undelivered
elements based on VSOE and the residual amounts of revenue are allocated to the delivered elements. If sufficient VSOE does not exist for the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement is
deferred until the earlier of the point at which such sufficient VSOE does exist or all elements of the arrangement have been delivered. If the only undelivered element is software maintenance, the entire fee is recognized ratably as subscription
revenue.

In software license arrangements where we also provide consulting services, license revenues are recognized upon delivery of the
product, provided that the criteria for recognition of software license revenues described above are met, payment of the license fees is not dependent upon the performance of the consulting services, and the consulting services are not essential to
the functionality of the software. If we determine that the consulting services are essential to the functionality of the software, or payment of the license fees is dependent upon the performance of the consulting services, then both the license
and consulting fees are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. We typically do not consider the consulting services we provide in such arrangements to be essential to the functionality of the software and, therefore, license revenues are
typically recognized upon delivery of the software and consulting revenues are recognized as the services are performed.

In arrangements
where we license our software and also host the licensed software for our customer, a software element is only considered present if our customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period
without significant penalty, and it is feasible for our customer to either operate the software on its own hardware or contract with another vendor to host the software. If the arrangement meets these criteria, as well as the other criteria for
recognition of license revenues described above, we deem there to be a software element present and recognize license revenues when the software is delivered, and we recognize the subscription hosting revenues as the hosting service is provided.
Hosting set-up fees for such arrangements, as well as the associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and recognized ratably over the hosting service period. If we determine that a separate software element as described above is not
present, we combine the software license fees with the subscription hosting fees and recognize them ratably over the subscription service period as subscription revenue.

Portions of our revenues are generated from sales made through our reseller partners. When we assume a majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations, we record the revenues
on a gross basis, and amounts paid to our reseller partners are recognized as cost of operations. Our assumption of such business risks is evidenced when, among other things, we take responsibility for delivery of the product or service, establish
pricing of the arrangement, and are the primary obligor in the arrangement. When our reseller partner assumes the majority of the business risks associated with the performance of the contractual obligations, we record the associated revenues net of
the amounts paid to our reseller partner.

Share-based Compensation

Our stock option program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests. Our option plans provide broad discretion
to our Board of Directors to create appropriate equity incentives for members of our Board of Directors and our employees. On October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, Share-based Payment, requiring us to recognize expense
related to the fair value of our share-based compensation awards. We elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, share-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2006, includes compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS 123, and compensation



8



---

##### Table of Contents

expense for all share-based compensation awards granted subsequent to October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS 123R. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we capitalize the portion of our share-based compensation attributed to internally developed software and defer the portion of our share-based compensation associated with activities that
generate deferred revenue. Under SFAS123R, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan is deemed non-compensatory. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail, including the impact of the adoption to our Consolidated Statement of
Operations.

Prior to October 1, 2005, we accounted for our share-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed
by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations, as opposed to the fair value method allowed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended. Accordingly, no share-based compensation cost is reflected in our statement of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005, as all options granted under these plans had exercise prices equal to the
fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, and any purchase discounts under our employee stock purchase plan were within statutory limits.

Income Tax

We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

We assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative,
including historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If recovery is not likely,
we increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable.

Computation of Net Income Per Share

We calculate basic net income per share by dividing net income for the period by the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period,
plus any dilutive effect from stock options, purchase rights, and warrants to purchase common stock during the period, under the treasury stock method. The computation of basic and diluted net income per share is as follows:



|                                                             |  |                             |        |                            |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                                             |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        | Nine Months Ended June 30,
|(in thousands, except per share data)                        |  | 2006                        |        | 2005                       |   | 2006   |  | 2005
|Net income                                                   |  | $                           | 31,559 |                            | $ | 1,728  |  | $    | 33,139 |  | $ | 3,228 
|Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding          |  |                             | 35,914 |                            |   | 32,629 |  |      | 34,695 |  |   | 32,780
|Add: Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation plans (1)   |  |                             | 3,998  |                            |   | 3,238  |  |      | 4,213  |  |   | 3,470 
|                                                             |  |                             |        |                            |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Dilutive weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding |  |                             | 39,912 |                            |   | 35,867 |  |      | 38,908 |  |   | 36,340
|                                                             |  |                             |        |                            |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Net income per share:                                        |  |                             |        |                            |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Basic                                                        |  | $                           | 0.88   |                            | $ | 0.05   |  | $    | 0.96   |  | $ | 0.10  
|Diluted                                                      |  | $                           | 0.79   |                            | $ | 0.05   |  | $    | 0.85   |  | $ | 0.09  



|(1) | Shares attributable to outstanding stock options granted under our stock-based compensation plans that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the
exercise prices of the such options and rights were greater than or equal to the average price of our common stock, and therefore their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive, totaled 1.2 and 0.8 million for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2006, and 2.4 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent Pronouncements

The FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion 20 Accounting
Changes and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements  An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error
corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the earliest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and restatement with respect to the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 and is required to be



9



---

##### Table of Contents

adopted by Concur in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. We do not expect SFAS154 to have a material impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.

The FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosures, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 5, 2006 and is required to be adopted by Concur in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect of FIN48.

NOTE 2. BUSINESS COMBINATION

On January 23, 2006 we acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Outtask, Inc., a privately held company based in Alexandria, Virginia. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. Certain aspects of the purchase price allocations for Outtask are preliminary and have been made using
initial estimates of value. These estimates are the responsibility of management. Adjustments due to the finalization of these estimates will be included in the allocation of the purchase price if the adjustment is determined within one year of the
consummation date, or the purchase price allocation period. The operating results of Outtask are included in Concurs consolidated statement of operations from the date of the acquisition. Pro forma results of operations are presented for
Outtask because the effect of this acquisition was material to Concur on an individual basis.

Under the terms of the agreement, all
outstanding securities of Outtask were exchanged for $23.4 million in cash and approximately 2.9 million to 3.5 million shares of Concur common stock all totaling between approximately $66.4 million and $88 million based on the closing
price of Concur common stock on January 20, 2006. The final amount of consideration paid in the acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of combined company performance metrics as of September 30, 2006 set forth in the definitive merger
agreement. Amounts totaling $4.5 million were held back from the initial payment of cash consideration against contractual requirements identified in the agreement. These holdbacks represent amounts retained from the initial consideration to be paid
on closing. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, we settled the final working capital holdback for approximately $1.4 million related to our acquisition of Outtask Incorporated with the Outtask stockholder representative. Concur retained the remaining $0.6
million of the working capital holdback, thereby reducing total preliminary purchase consideration for the acquisition to $66.4 million at June 30, 2006.

Outtask is a Software as a Service provider, delivering employee-facing applications for travel and expense management to corporate customers. We acquired Outtask to expand our on-demand CEM suite, in
particular by offering clients a corporate travel management service, Cliqbook. The total preliminary purchase price of $66.4 million was comprised of:



|                                      |  |   |     
|------------------------------------- |  | - | ----
|Purchase Consideration(in millions)   |  |  
|Cash                                  |  | $ | 23.4
|Equity, common stock                  |  |   | 26.0
|Equity, options                       |  |   | 13.9
|Acquisition-related transaction costs |  |   | 3.1 
|                                      |  |   |     
|Total                                 |  | $ | 66.4
|                                      |  |   |     

The fair value of the approximately 1.2 million fully-vested options granted was calculated
using a Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions: weighted average remaining expected life of 0.5 years, average risk-free interest rate of 4.2% average expected volatility of 38.2%, and no dividend yield.

Acquisition related transaction costs include investment banking, legal and accounting fees, and other third-party costs directly related to the
acquisition.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

The preliminary allocation of the total purchase price of Outtasks net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was based upon the estimated fair
value of those assets as of January 23, 2006. Adjustments to these estimates will be included in the allocation of the purchase price of Outtask, if the adjustment is determined to be within the purchase price allocation period which will end
no later than January 23, 2007. The excess of purchase price over the identifiable intangible and net tangible assets was allocated to goodwill. The total purchase price of $66.4 million has been allocated as follows:



|                                                   |  |   |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---- | -
|Preliminary Purchase Price
Allocation(in millions) |  |   |     
|Cash and cash equivalents                          |  | $ | 1.5  |  
|Accounts receivable                                |  |   | 3.2  |  
|Property and equipment                             |  |   | 0.7  |  
|Goodwill                                           |  |   | 55.2 |  
|Other intangible assets                            |  |   | 10.2 |  
|Accounts payable                                   |  |   | (0.1 | )
|Accrued expenses                                   |  |   | (3.5 | )
|Deferred revenue                                   |  |   | (0.8 | )
|                                                   |  |   |      |  
|Total                                              |  | $ | 66.4 |  
|                                                   |  |   |      |  

Intangible assets

Other intangible assets include trade name and trademarks, technology, non-compete agreements, and customer relationships. We estimated the fair value of other intangible assets using the income approach, including
the excess earnings methodology, to value these identifiable intangible assets which are subject to amortization. These estimates are the responsibility of management, are based on a preliminary valuation, and are subject to change upon
managements completion of the final valuation. The following table sets forth the components of these other intangible assets at June 30, 2006:



|                                  |  |                       |        |                         |   |                             |  |                                       |       |  |    
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ----- |  | ---
|Description(dollars in thousands) |  | PreliminaryFair Value |        | AccumulatedAmortization |   | Net Book Valueas of 6/30/06 |  | Weighted AverageUseful Life(in years)
|Trade name and trademarks         |  | $                     | 200    |                         | $ | 88                          |  | $                                     | 112   |  | 1.0
|Technology                        |  |                       | 3,400  |                         |   | 305                         |  |                                       | 3,095 |  | 5.4
|Non-compete agreements            |  |                       | 200    |                         |   | 44                          |  |                                       | 156   |  | 2.0
|Customer relationships            |  |                       | 6,400  |                         |   | 305                         |  |                                       | 6,095 |  | 9.3
|                                  |  |                       |        |                         |   |                             |  |                                       |       |  |    
|Total                             |  | $                     | 10,200 |                         | $ | 742                         |  | $                                     | 9,458 |  |    
|                                  |  |                       |        |                         |   |                             |  |                                       |       |  |    

Tangible Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

We have estimated the fair value of certain tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Some of these estimates are subject to change, particularly
those estimates relating to the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred revenues, and deferred taxes. Adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred revenues, and deferred taxes may be required during the purchase price allocation
period.

Pro Forma Results

The
unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations for Concur and Outtask on a pro forma basis as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of each of the periods presented.
Concurs results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 included the results of Outtask since January 23, 2006, the date of acquisition. The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2006 combines Concurs results for these periods with the results of Outtask for the period from October 1, 2005 through January 22, 2006 as applicable. The pro forma financial information below is for informational
purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition would have taken place at the beginning of each of the periods presented:



|                                         |  |                             |        |                            |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                         |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        | Nine Months Ended June 30,
|(in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | 2006                        |        | 2005                       |   | 2006   |  | 2005
|Revenues                                 |  | $                           | 26,874 |                            | $ | 22,238 |  | $    | 74,478 |  | $ | 62,161
|Net income                               |  | $                           | 31,559 |                            | $ | 1,447  |  | $    | 32,106 |  | $ | 2,016 
|Net income per share                     |  | $                           | 0.79   |                            | $ | 0.04   |  | $    | 0.80   |  | $ | 0.05  



11



---

##### Table of Contents

NOTE 3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Amortization of intangible assets represents the allocation of intangible assets from our July 2002 acquisition of Captura Software, Inc. and our January 2006 acquisition of Outtask, Inc. The gross and net carrying
amounts of the acquired customer base intangible assets at June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 were as follows:



|                                                       |  |              |        |   |                   |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ | ------ | - | ----------------- | - | ------ | -
|Acquired Customer Base Intangible Asset (in thousands) |  | June 30,2006 |        |   | September 30,2005 |  
|Gross carrying amount                                  |  | $            | 15,900 |   |                   | $ | 5,700  |  
|Accumulated amortization                               |  |              | (5,207 | ) |                   |   | (3,610 | )
|                                                       |  |              |        |   |                   |   |        |  
|Acquired customer base intangible asset, net           |  | $            | 10,693 |   |                   | $ | 2,090  |  
|                                                       |  |              |        |   |                   |   |        |  

The related amortization expense reflected in our results of operations totaled $0.7 million and
$1.6 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006.

Estimated amortization expense for the remaining three months of
fiscal 2006 and annually for the remaining estimated useful life is as follows:



|                                                       |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | -----
|Estimated Remaining Amortization
Expense(in thousands) |  |  
|Remainder of Fiscal 2006                               |  | $ | 706  
|Fiscal 2007                                            |  |   | 2,494
|Fiscal 2008                                            |  |   | 1,413
|Fiscal 2009                                            |  |   | 1,383
|Fiscal 2010                                            |  |   | 1,124
|Thereafter                                             |  |   | 3,574

NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

In July 2001, we and several of our current and former officers were named as defendants
in two securities class-action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In April 2002, these lawsuits were consolidated along with more than 300 similar pending cases filed against companies that
completed initial public offerings between 1997 and 2000 and the underwriters that took them public. In October 2002, the court dismissed the individual present and former officers of Concur named as defendants from the consolidated lawsuit, without
prejudice, pursuant to a stipulated agreement between the parties. In February 2003, the presiding judge denied a motion to dismiss all claims. In July 2003, we decided to participate in a proposed settlement negotiated by representatives of a
coalition of issuers named as defendants in similar actions and their insurers. Although we believe that the plaintiffs claims have no merit, we decided to participate in the proposed settlement to avoid the cost and distraction of continued
litigation. We do not believe that the proposed settlement will have any material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. The proposed settlement is expected to be funded by a group of insurers on behalf of the
issuer defendants. The proposed settlement agreement would dispose of all remaining claims against us and the individual defendants, without any admission of wrongdoing by us or the individual defendants. The proposed settlement has been
preliminarily approved by the court, but remains subject to final approval by the parties and the court. There is no guarantee that the parties or the court will finalize the proposed settlement. Should the parties and the court fail to finalize the
proposed settlement, we would continue to defend ourselves vigorously.

Product Warranty and Indemnification Obligations

We provide services and software solutions to our customers under sales contracts, which usually include a limited warranty regarding product and service
performance and a limited indemnification of customers against losses, expenses, and liabilities from damages that may be awarded against them if our services or software are found to infringe upon a patent, copyright, trademark, or other
proprietary right of a third party. The contracts generally limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations in a variety of industry-standard respects, including but not limited to certain time and geography-based scope
limitations and a right for us to replace an infringing product. We also enter into similar limited indemnification terms in agreements with certain strategic business partners and vendors. We account for potential warranty claims in accordance with
the guidance in SFAS 5, and base our estimates on historical experience and current expectations. To date, we have experienced minimal warranty claims and have not had to reimburse any customers for any losses related to the limited indemnification
described above.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

NOTE 5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. The item of comprehensive income
that we currently report is foreign currency translation adjustments as follows:



|                                         |  |                             |        |      |                            |       |      |  |      |        |  |   |       |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ---- | -------------------------- | ----- | ---- |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ----- | -
|                                         |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        |      | Nine Months Ended June 30, |      
|(in thousands)                           |  | 2006                        |        | 2005 |                            |       | 2006 |  | 2005 |       
|Net income                               |  | $                           | 31,559 |      | $                          | 1,728 |      |  | $    | 33,139 |  | $ | 3,228 |  
|Other comprehensive income               |  |                             |        |      |                            |       |      |  |      |        |  |   |       |  
|Foreign currency translation adjustments |  |                             | 153    |      |                            | (101  | )    |  |      | 39     |  |   | (4    | )
|                                         |  |                             |        |      |                            |       |      |  |      |        |  |   |       |  
|Total comprehensive income               |  | $                           | 31,712 |      | $                          | 1,627 |      |  | $    | 33,178 |  | $ | 3,224 |  
|                                         |  |                             |        |      |                            |       |      |  |      |        |  |   |       |  

NOTE 6. INTERNATIONAL REVENUES

We market our services and products primarily in the United States, Europe and Australia and we operate in a single industry segment. No single customer
accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Information regarding revenues by geographic region for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
is as follows:



|                       |  |                             |        |   |                            |   |      |   |        |  |       |      |  |   |        |  |       |   |   |   |        |  |       |  
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | - | -------------------------- | - | ---- | - | ------ |  | ----- | ---- |  | - | ------ |  | ----- | - | - | - | ------ |  | ----- | -
|                       |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        |   | Nine Months Ended June 30, |  
|(dollars in thousands) |  | 2006                        |        | % |                            |   | 2005 |   | %      |  |       | 2006 |  | % |        |  | 2005  |   | % |  
|Country:               |  |                             |        |   |                            |   |      |   |        |  |       |      |  |   |        |  |       |   |   |   |        |  |       |  
|United States          |  | $                           | 24,126 |   | 89.8                       | % |      | $ | 16,115 |  | 86.6  | %    |  | $ | 61,721 |  | 88.6  | % |   | $ | 44,657 |  | 85.6  | %
|Europe                 |  |                             | 1,717  |   | 6.4                        |   |      |   | 1,569  |  | 8.4   |      |  |   | 5,180  |  | 7.4   |   |   |   | 4,977  |  | 9.5   |  
|Other                  |  |                             | 1,031  |   | 3.8                        |   |      |   | 924    |  | 5.0   |      |  |   | 2,753  |  | 4.0   |   |   |   | 2,575  |  | 4.9   |  
|                       |  |                             |        |   |                            |   |      |   |        |  |       |      |  |   |        |  |       |   |   |   |        |  |       |  
|Total revenues         |  | $                           | 26,874 |   | 100.0                      | % |      | $ | 18,608 |  | 100.0 | %    |  | $ | 69,654 |  | 100.0 | % |   | $ | 52,209 |  | 100.0 | %
|                       |  |                             |        |   |                            |   |      |   |        |  |       |      |  |   |        |  |       |   |   |   |        |  |       |  

NOTE 7. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES



|                                           |  |                             |    |  |                            |      |    |        |          |   |      |          |    |      |   |      |        |  |          |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------- | -- |  | -------------------------- | ---- | -- | ------ | -------- | - | ---- | -------- | -- | ---- | - | ---- | ------ |  | -------- | -
|                                           |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |    |  | Nine Months Ended June 30, |     
|(dollars in thousands, except percentages) |  | 2006                        |    |  | 2005                       |      |    | Change |          |   | 2006 |          |    | 2005 |   |      | Change | 
|Benefit from income taxes                  |  | ($29,120                    | )  |  | $                          | 0    |    |        | ($29,120 | ) |      | ($29,000 | )  |      | $ | 0    |        |  | ($29,000 | )
|Effective tax rate                         |  | (1,193.8                    | %) |  |                            | (0.0 | %) |        |          |   |      | (700.6   | %) |      |   | (0.0 | %)     |  |          |  

We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement
purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

We assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative,
including historical levels of income, expectations and risk associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If recovery is not
likely, we record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. The available positive evidence at June 30, 2006 included three years of historical operating profits and a projection
of future income. As a result of our analysis of all available evidence, both positive and negative, at June 30, 2006, it was considered more likely than not that a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was not required and we
released a portion of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our deferred tax assets, generating a $29.1 million tax benefit recorded to the income statement. This resulted in an effective tax rate of (1,193.8%) for the three month
period ended June 30, 2006 compared with an effective tax rate of 0.0% used to record the provision for income taxes for the comparable three month period in fiscal year 2005. Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006
also differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the release of the deferred tax valuation allowance. Our effective tax rate is also affected by share-based compensation, state taxes, foreign operations, and other non-deductible expenses.

As of June 30, 2006, we believed it is more likely than not that the amount of the deferred tax assets recorded on our balance sheet
as a result of the partial release of valuation allowance will ultimately be recovered. In the event that actual results differ from our estimates or we adjust our estimates in future periods, our operating results and financial position could be
materially affected.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Companys deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances:



|                                    |  |               |          |   |                    |   |           |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------- | -------- | - | ------------------ | - | --------- | -
|(dollars in thousands)              |  | June 30, 2006 |          |   | September 30, 2005 |  
|Deferred tax assets                 |  | $             | 108,315  |   |                    | $ | 109,225   |  
|Valuation allowances                |  |               | ($79,230 | ) |                    |   | ($109,225 | )
|                                    |  |               |          |   |                    |   |           |  
|Deferred tax assets, net            |  | $             | 29,085   |   |                    | $ |          |  
|                                    |  |               |          |   |                    |   |           |  
|                                    |  |              
|Short-term deferred tax assets, net |  | $             | 2,680    |   |                    | $ |          |  
|Long-term deferred tax assets, net  |  | $             | 26,405   |   |                    | $ |          |  
|                                    |  |               |          |   |                    |   |           |  
|                                    |  |              
|Deferred tax assets, net            |  | $             | 29,085   |   |                    | $ |          |  
|                                    |  |               |          |   |                    |   |           |  

The valuation allowance as of June 30, 2006, primarily relates to federal, state, and foreign
net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits that the company expects will expire unused.

NOTE 8. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

We have a share-based compensation program that provides our Board of Directors broad discretion in creating employee equity incentives. The program
includes incentive and non-statutory stock options granted under various plans, which are approved by the Board of Directors. Stock options generally vest one to four years after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date. As of
June 30, 2006, we had approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our stock option plans, excluding shares of common stock reserved for future issue under our ESPP.

The following table sets forth the share-based compensation expense resulting from stock options that is recorded in our Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands). Options issued in replacement of outstanding options to purchase shares of Outtask common stock assumed as part of the acquisition of Outtask are non-compensatory and
are therefore excluded from all tables, unless otherwise noted:



|                                    |  |                               |       |                              |   |      
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | ---------------------------- | - | -----
|(dollars in thousands)              |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30,2006 |       | Nine MonthsEndedJune 30,2006
|Cost of services                    |  | $                             | 343   |                              | $ | 861  
|Sales and marketing                 |  |                               | 447   |                              |   | 1,192
|Systems development and programming |  |                               | 180   |                              |   | 305  
|General and administrative          |  |                               | 501   |                              |   | 1,085
|                                    |  |                               |       |                              |   |      
|Total                               |  | $                             | 1,471 |                              | $ | 3,443
|                                    |  |                               |       |                              |   |      

Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $1.5 million and $4.2 million for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, and $0.8 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005 respectively. No income tax benefit was realized from stock option exercises during the three months ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we present excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, if any, as financing cash flows rather than operating cash flows.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we capitalized $44 thousand as property and equipment on the balance sheet for share-based compensation
incurred in the development of internal use software and deferred $25 thousand of operating costs for share-based compensation associated with the deployment of customers. The amounts capitalized for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2006 were related to the following expense categories (in thousands):



|                                    |  |                               |    |                              |   |    
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | -- | ---------------------------- | - | ---
|(dollars in thousands)              |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30,2006 |    | Nine MonthsEndedJune 30,2006
|Cost of services                    |  | $                             | 25 |                              | $ | 63 
|Systems development and programming |  |                               | 44 |                              |   | 123
|                                    |  |                               |    |                              |   |    
|Total                               |  | $                             | 69 |                              | $ | 186
|                                    |  |                               |    |                              |   |    

SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), as
amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), requires companies that choose, prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R, to continue to follow APB 25 to provide pro
forma disclosure of the impact of accounting for share-based compensation using the fair value method of SFAS 123. For purposes of these pro forma disclosures, the



14



---

##### Table of Contents

estimated fair value of the options is amortized over the related vesting periods. The estimated fair value of purchases under the ESPP is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the related purchase periods, ranging from six to twenty-four months. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss after tax and net loss per common share as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions
of SFAS 123 to share-based compensation during the three and nine month period ended June 30, 2005:



|                                                      |  |                               |       |   |                              |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | - | ---------------------------- | - | ------ | -
|(in thousands, except per share data)                 |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30,2005 |       |   | Nine MonthsEndedJune 30,2005 |  
|Net income, as reported                               |  | $                             | 1,728 |   |                              | $ | 3,228  |  
|Add: Share-based compensation expense, as reported    |  |                               |      |   |                              |   |       |  
|Deduct: Pro forma compensation expense under SFAS 123 |  |                               | (986  | ) |                              |   | (3,808 | )
|                                                      |  |                               |       |   |                              |   |        |  
|Pro forma net income (loss)                           |  | $                             | 742   |   |                              | $ | (580   | )
|                                                      |  |                               |       |   |                              |   |        |  
|Net income (loss) per share:                          |  |                               |       |   |                              |   |        |  
|Basic as reported                                     |  | $                             | 0.05  |   |                              | $ | 0.10   |  
|Diluted, as reported                                  |  | $                             | 0.05  |   |                              | $ | 0.09   |  
|Basic, pro forma                                      |  | $                             | 0.02  |   |                              | $ | (0.02  | )
|Diluted, pro forma                                    |  | $                             | 0.02  |   |                              | $ | (0.02  | )

The fair value of share-based awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the
following weighted-average assumptions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively:



|                                          |  |                           |      |   |                          |   |      |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |      |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ---- | - | ------------------------ | - | ---- | ------------- |  | - | ------------- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                          |  | OptionsThree Months Ended |      |   | OptionsNine Months Ended |  
|(dollars in thousands)                    |  | June 30, 2006             |      |   | June 30, 2005            |   |      | June 30, 2006 |  |   | June 30, 2005 |  
|Expected life (in years)                  |  |                           | 4.7  |   |                          |   | 4.5  |               |  |   | 4.7           |   |  |   | 4.1  |  
|Interest rate                             |  |                           | 5.0  | % |                          |   | 3.9  | %             |  |   | 4.4           | % |  |   | 3.6  | %
|Volatility                                |  |                           | 0.60 |   |                          |   | 0.66 |               |  |   | 0.64          |   |  |   | 0.68 |  
|Dividend yield                            |  |                           |     |   |                          |   |     |               |  |   |              |   |  |   |     |  
|Weighted average fair value at grant date |  | $                         | 9.18 |   |                          | $ | 4.32 |               |  | $ | 7.58          |   |  | $ | 4.64 |  

Our computation of the expected volatility for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006
is based upon historical volatility. Our computation of expected life is based on historical exercise patterns. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
the grant.

Stock option activity for the three months ended June 30, 2006 including fully-vested options issued in replacement of
outstanding options to purchase shares of Outtask common stock assumed as part of the acquisition of Outtask was as follows:



|                                         |  |        |   |  |                               |       |                                         |      |                         |   |       
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------ | - |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | --------------------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | - | ------
|(in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | Shares |   |  | WeightedAverageExercise Price |       | Weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm |      | AggregateIntrinsicValue
|Outstanding at March 31, 2006            |  | 7,791  |   |  | $                             | 6.65  |                                         |     |                         |   |      
|Grants                                   |  | 93     |   |  |                               | 17.01 |                                         |     |                         |   |      
|Exercises                                |  | (526   | ) |  |                               | 2.79  |                                         |     |                         |   |      
|Forfeiture or expirations                |  | (20    | ) |  |                               | 18.41 |                                         |     |                         |   |      
|                                         |  |        |   |  |                               |       |                                         |      |                         |   |       
|Outstanding at June 30, 2006             |  | 7,338  |   |  |                               | 7.03  |                                         | 6.48 |                         | $ | 63,759
|Exercisable at June 30, 2006             |  | 5,375  |   |  |                               | 5.48  |                                         | 5.63 |                         |   | 55,296

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents total pretax intrinsic value (i.e.,
the difference between Concurs closing stock price on the last trading day of our third quarter of fiscal 2006 and the exercise price, times the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options on June 30, 2006. The amount changes based on the fair market value of Concurs common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was $6.6 and $14.0 million for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2006.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2006, $7.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. Total fair value of options vested during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.6 and $2.4 million, respectively.

NOTE 9. LONG-TERM DEBT

In January 2006, we entered
into a $22 million secured amended and restated loan and security agreement (Amended Loan Agreement) with Comerica Bank to replace the loan agreement in place at the time. The loan agreement that we replaced provided for a $6.5 million
revolving line of credit, $4.0 million to fund working capital needs and $2.5 million to fund equipment purchases. The Amended Loan Agreement established a $14.0 million five year term loan to fund the acquisition of Outtask and an $8.0 million line
of credit.

The proceeds of the $14 million term loan were used to fund the acquisition of Outtask. The proceeds of the revolving line of
credit may be used for working capital, to pay transaction costs of the Amended Loan Agreement, to finance repurchases of our capital stock subject to certain limitations, and for permitted capital expenditures, among other things. The Amended Loan
Agreement is secured by pledges of our stock and membership interests in, and guarantees of, our subsidiaries and security interests in substantially all of our assets.

The term loan under the Amended Loan Agreement matures on December 31, 2010. We may make prepayments on advances under the term loan without penalty, provided we pay accrued interest and otherwise make Comerica
whole. Because the Amended Loan Agreement calls for a five year term loan, we have minimum payments scheduled in fiscal years 2006 to 2010. These scheduled minimum payments are approximately $0.6 million per quarter in 2006, approximately $0.7
million per quarter in 2007 through 2009, and approximately $0.8 million in 2010. The term loan bears an interest rate equal to Comericas prime rate plus a range of 0.75% to 1.25% or LIBOR plus a range of 3.0% to 3.5%, and matures on
December 31, 2010.

The revolving credit facility under the Amended Loan Agreement originally matured on January 23, 2007. In
August 2006, we entered into an agreement to amend the line of credit to mature on July 23, 2007. We may make prepayments on advances under the revolving line of credit without penalty, provided we pay accrued interest and otherwise make Comerica
whole. As the loan agreement is a revolving credit facility, there are no scheduled minimum principal repayments. Advances under the revolving credit facility bear an interest rate equal to Comericas prime rate plus a range of 0.50% to 1.00%
or LIBOR plus a range of 2.75% to 3.25%.

The Amended Loan Agreement includes certain covenants, including, without limitation, certain
restrictions on the use of proceeds and compliance with certain financial covenants (including interest coverage, minimum EBITDA, and our ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA). The Amended Loan Agreement also requires compliance with other
covenants which limit Concurs ability, without first obtaining written consent of Comerica, to consummate a sale of assets, make changes in our capital structure, and pay out dividends.

In the event of a default under the Amended Loan Agreement, Comerica may terminate the commitments made under the loan agreement, declare amounts
outstanding, including interest and fees, payable immediately, and enforce other rights and interests under the agreement and applicable law.

As of June 30, 2006, we had $12.8 million outstanding on our term loan and $4.0 million outstanding on our line of credit and were in compliance with all loan covenants as required.



|ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides information we believe is relevant to an
assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes that are included with this report. Also, the discussion of
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in this section is an integral part of the analysis of our results of operations and financial condition.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements regarding our plans,
objectives, expectations, intentions, future financial performance, future financial condition, the integration of Outtask, Inc., and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements can be identified by our use of the future tense,
or by forward-looking words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, continue, and other similar words and phrases. These



16



---

##### Table of Contents

forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties. Examples of such risks and uncertainties are described in Item 1A of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 under Risk Factors, as well as in our other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Material changes to these examples of risks
and uncertainties are described under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report. The occurrence of any of these risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking
statements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. We
assume no obligation or duty to update any such forward-looking statements.

Overview

Concur Technologies, Inc. is a leading provider of business services and solutions that automate processes involved in the management of corporate
expenses. Our core purpose is to use innovation to help our customers drive down their costs associated with corporate expense management (CEM). Concurs integrated suite of on-demand CEM services includes Concur Expense Service for
managing the expense reporting process, Cliqbook Travel for corporate travel management, and Cliqbook Meeting for corporate meeting and group travel management. We also offer value-added services and software that are integrated with our core
services and software, as well as consulting, customer support and training for our customers. Our solutions are designed to automate and streamline these business processes, reduce operating costs, improve internal controls, and empower
businesses to apply greater insight to their spending patterns through comprehensive analytics.

On January 23, 2006, we completed our
acquisition of Outtask, which added a market-leading online corporate travel management service called Cliqbook to our suite of CEM services. This addition expanded our suite of CEM solutions and simplify the entire travel and expense management
workflow of our customers, which we believe will further differentiate Concur from our competition.

We offer our solutions under flexible
delivery models that range from highly-configurable to standardized. We sell our solutions predominantly as subscription services and, to a much lesser extent, through our on-premises license agreements. We market and sell our solutions worldwide
through our direct sales organization and indirect distribution channels.

We generate our revenues from the delivery of subscription
services, consulting services, and, to a lesser extent, the sale of software licenses.

Our strategic focus in fiscal 2006 and over the
near-term is to continue to expand our suite of CEM services offerings, to expand our direct and indirect distribution network and to set the standard for operational and service excellence for our services. We expect our subscription revenues to
increase in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005, on both an absolute basis and as a percentage of total revenues, due to anticipated demand for our subscription services as well as the acquisition of Outtask. We expect total expenses on an absolute
basis to increase in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 as a result of the acquisition of Outtask on January 23, 2006 and the growth of our business.

We operate in and report on one segment: corporate expense management services.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005

Selected Financial Data

In the following table, we show financial data derived from our unaudited statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.



|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | - |  | -------------------------- | - |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                    |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |   |  | Nine Months Ended June 30, |  
|                                    |  | 2006                        |   |  | 2005                       |   |  | 2006  |   |  | 2005  |  
|Revenues from services:             |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Subscription services               |  | 83.3                        | % |  | 74.5                       | % |  | 81.5  | % |  | 74.0  | %
|Consulting services and other       |  | 16.7                        |   |  | 25.5                       |   |  | 18.5  |   |  | 26.0  |  
|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Total revenues                      |  | 100.0                       |   |  | 100.0                      |   |  | 100.0 |   |  | 100.0 |  
|                                    |  |                             |   | 
|Expenses:                           |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Cost of services                    |  | 37.8                        |   |  | 39.5                       |   |  | 39.9  |   |  | 40.1  |  
|Sales and marketing                 |  | 22.6                        |   |  | 23.8                       |   |  | 23.7  |   |  | 24.7  |  
|Systems development and programming |  | 14.1                        |   |  | 11.7                       |   |  | 13.0  |   |  | 13.5  |  
|General and administrative          |  | 13.2                        |   |  | 14.5                       |   |  | 14.7  |   |  | 14.4  |  
|Amortization of intangible asset    |  | 2.6                         |   |  | 1.5                        |   |  | 2.3   |   |  | 1.6   |  
|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Total expenses                      |  | 90.3                        |   |  | 91.0                       |   |  | 93.6  |   |  | 94.3  |  
|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Income from operations              |  | 9.7                         | % |  | 9.0                        | % |  | 6.4   | % |  | 5.7   | %
|Interest income                     |  | 0.5                         |   |  | 0.4                        |   |  | 0.5   |   |  | 0.5   |  
|Interest expense                    |  | (1.4                        | ) |  |                           |   |  | (0.8  | ) |  |      |  
|Other income, net                   |  | 0.3                         |   |  | (0.1                       | ) |  | (0.1  | ) |  |      |  
|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Income before income tax            |  | 9.1                         | % |  | 9.3                        | % |  | 6.0   | % |  | 6.2   | %
|Provision for income tax            |  | 108.3                       |   |  |                           |   |  | 41.6  |   |  |      |  
|Net income                          |  | 117.4                       | % |  | 9.3                        | % |  | 47.6  | % |  | 6.2   | %
|                                    |  |                             |   |  |                            |   |  |       |   |  |       |  



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Revenues



|                       |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |      |      |  |      |        |        |   |        |  |      |   
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ---- | -------------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | ---- |  | ---- | ------ | ------ | - | ------ |  | ---- | --
|                       |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        |      | Nine Months Ended June 30, |       
|(dollars in thousands) |  | 2006                        |        | 2005 |                            | Change |  |      | 2006 |  | 2005 |        | Change |  
|Subscription           |  | $                           | 22,385 |      | $                          | 13,861 |  | 61.5 | %    |  | $    | 56,790 |        | $ | 38,620 |  | 47.0 | % 
|Consulting & other     |  |                             | 4,489  |      |                            | 4,747  |  | (5.4 | %)   |  |      | 12,863 |        |   | 13,589 |  | (5.3 | %)
|                       |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |      |      |  |      |        |        |   |        |  |      |   
|Total revenues         |  | $                           | 26,874 |      | $                          | 18,608 |  | 44.4 | %    |  | $    | 69,653 |        | $ | 52,209 |  | 33.4 | % 
|                       |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |      |      |  |      |        |        |   |        |  |      |   

Subscription Revenues. Subscription revenues consist of monthly fees paid for
subscription services, the amortization of set-up fees paid to us in connection with those services, the amortization of fees paid for software maintenance services under software license arrangements, and, in some multiple element subscription
arrangements where there is no vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for an undelivered subscription element, the amortized portion of the related license and consulting fees. Subscription revenues are affected by pricing, number of new
customers, customer contract durations, and our customer retention rate.

Subscription revenues increased 61.5%, or $8.5 million, for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in fiscal 2005, and increased 47.0%, or $18.2 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared with the year earlier period. Revenues from our subscription services
(total subscription revenues excluding revenue from the amortization of fees paid for software maintenance services under software license agreements) contributed approximately 45.6%, or $3.9 million, and 58.4%, or $10.6 million of the absolute
dollar increase in subscription revenues the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. Transaction-based revenues from our monthly travel services contributed approximately 55.9%, or $4.8 million,
and 43.7%, or $7.9 million of the absolute dollar increase in subscription revenues the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. These increases were offset by a 1.5%, or $0.1 million, and 2.1%, or
$0.4 million, decline in maintenance revenue recognized for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. The acquisition of Outtask and the continued expansion of our subscription services customer
base, coupled with strong retention of existing customers, were the main reasons for the increase. The larger customer base reflects a trend of increased market demand for our subscription services and strong retention of existing subscription
customers. We believe this expansion relates primarily to the markets continued growing acceptance of outsourced services, driven in part by limited information technology capital budgets. We believe these economic trends make traditional
self-hosted software license arrangements, with their substantial up-front costs, less attractive than subscription services.

We expect
subscription revenues to continue to grow in fiscal 2006, both on an absolute basis and as a percentage of total revenues, as a result of the growing demand for our subscription CEM service offerings and our continuing investment in sales and
marketing.

Consulting and Other Revenues. Consulting revenues consist of fees for client services, which include system
implementation and integration, planning, data conversion, training, and documentation of procedures. Consulting revenues are affected predominantly by the number and complexity of on-premises license customer upgrade implementations. Recognition of
consulting revenues can also be affected by circumstances in which consulting fees in multiple element arrangements require deferral or are deemed to be subscription related. Other revenues consist of fees earned from sales of our software licenses.

The 5.4%, or $0.3 million, decrease and the 5.3%, or $0.7 million, decrease in consulting and other revenues for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005, were primarily due to decreased consulting services performed for existing customers upgrading to the latest version of our on-premise license software.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

We anticipate that consulting and other revenues in fiscal 2006 will fluctuate on a quarterly basis but
be lower for fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues, primarily as a result of fewer existing customers upgrading their on-premise license software, the continued growth of subscription revenues, and
the markets continued shift in demand from a licensed model to a subscription services model.

International Revenues.
Revenues from customers outside the United States were $2.7 million (10.2% of total revenues) and $2.5 million (13.4% of total revenues) in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and were $7.9 million (11.4% of total revenues) and $7.6
million (14.5% of total revenues) in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Historically, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have not had a material effect on our operating results.

We expect our international revenues to increase in absolute dollars consistent with our overall growth in revenue, as our CEM service offerings continue
to gain acceptance in international markets, due in part to the expansion of international functionality within our solutions.

Expenses



|                                    |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |       |      |  |      |         |        |   |        |  |      |  
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ---- | -------------------------- | ------ |  | ----- | ---- |  | ---- | ------- | ------ | - | ------ |  | ---- | -
|                                    |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        |      | Nine Months Ended June 30, |       
|(dollars in thousands)              |  | 2006                        |        | 2005 |                            | Change |  |       | 2006 |  | 2005 |         | Change |  
|Cost of services                    |  | $                           | 10,153 |      | $                          | 7,349  |  | 38.2  | %    |  |      | $27,779 |        | $ | 20,913 |  | 32.8 | %
|Sales and marketing                 |  |                             | 6,067  |      |                            | 4,431  |  | 36.9  | %    |  |      | 16,491  |        |   | 12,872 |  | 28.1 | %
|Systems development and programming |  |                             | 3,793  |      |                            | 2,168  |  | 75.0  | %    |  |      | 9,057   |        |   | 7,050  |  | 28.5 | %
|General and administrative          |  |                             | 3,546  |      |                            | 2,701  |  | 31.3  | %    |  |      | 10,288  |        |   | 7,522  |  | 36.8 | %
|Amortization of intangible assets   |  |                             | 706    |      |                            | 285    |  | 147.7 | %    |  |      | 1,597   |        |   | 855    |  | 86.8 | %
|                                    |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |       |      |  |      |         |        |   |        |  |      |  
|Total expenses                      |  | $                           | 24,265 |      | $                          | 16,934 |  | 43.3  | %    |  | $    | 65,212  |        | $ | 49,212 |  | 32.5 | %
|                                    |  |                             |        |      |                            |        |  |       |      |  |      |         |        |   |        |  |      |  

Cost of Services. Cost of services primarily consist of salaries and related expenses
(including share-based compensation and travel related expenses) and allocated overhead costs (including depreciation, occupancy, insurance, telecommunications, and computer equipment expenses) associated with employees and contractors who provide
our subscription and consulting services. Cost of services expenses also include co-location and related telecommunications costs, fees paid to third parties for referrals, resale arrangements, royalties, and amortization of deferred set-up costs we
incur in connection with our subscription services.

Cost of services represented 37.8% of total revenues for the three months and 39.9% of
total revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 39.5% and 40.1% for the same periods in fiscal 2005. Total salaries and related expenses and allocated overhead costs increased 41.4%, or $1.8 million, for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, and increased 37.2%, or $4.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. Share-based compensation accounted for $0.3 and $0.9 million of the increase for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Excluding the impact of share-based compensation expenses, which the company began recording October 1, 2005 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard 123R, cost of services expenses
represented 36.5% and 38.6% of total revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 39.5% and 40.1% for the same period in fiscal 2005. Fees paid to third parties for referrals, resale arrangements, and royalties
increased 50.3%, or $0.3 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and increased 30.2%, or $0.5 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared with the same periods in fiscal 2005. These increases were due to increased
business generated through reseller partners for subscription-based sales. Fees paid for servers and storage decreased 11.3%, or $0.1 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, but increased 27.1% or $0.4 million for the nine months
ended June 30, 2006, compared with the same periods in fiscal 2005. The remainder of the change in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 was the result of higher amortization and other expenses.

We expect cost of services expenses to fluctuate moderately from quarter to quarter, and generally to trend down in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005
as a percentage of total revenues as the incremental cost to deploy and support each new customer is expected to decrease due to economies of scale anticipated in our subscription service model infrastructure. We anticipate that cost of operations
will increase in absolute dollars principally as a result of the acquisition of Outtask and as we continue to expand our capacity to deploy and support new customers.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of salaries and related expenses (including share-based compensation, sales commissions and travel related expenses) and allocated overhead costs
associated with our sales and marketing personnel, and, to a lesser extent, miscellaneous sales and marketing costs, such as advertising, trade shows, and other promotional activities.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Sales and marketing expenses were 22.6% of total revenues for the three months and 23.7% for the nine
months ended June 30, 2006 compared with 23.8% and 24.7% for the same periods in fiscal 2005. Total sales and marketing expenses increased 36.8%, or $1.6 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and increased 28.1%, or $3.6
million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared with the same periods in fiscal 2005, respectively. The increases in the three and nine month periods ending June 30, 2006, were mainly due to a 44.0%, or $1.6 million, and a 32.7%,
or $3.5 million increase in salaries and related expenses, driven primarily by headcount increases including the acquisition of Outtask, as well as a $0.4 million and $1.2 million in share-based compensation expense. Excluding the impact of
share-based compensation expenses, which the company began recording October 1, 2005 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard 123R, sales and marketing represented 20.9% of total revenues for the three months and 22.0% for the nine
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 23.8% and 24.7% for the same periods in fiscal 2005.

We expect total sales and marketing
expenses in fiscal 2006 to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due to our acquisition of Outtask and our continued emphasis on growing our investment in this area. This increase is
expected to be principally driven by an increase in sales headcount and is a key part of our strategic focus in fiscal 2006, which is to ensure that our sales and marketing efforts are able to support expected demand and create additional awareness
in our target markets.

Systems Development and Programming Costs. Systems development and programming costs consist of
salaries and related expenses (including share-based compensation), and allocated overhead costs associated with employees and contractors engaged in software engineering, program management, and quality assurance.

Systems development and programming costs were 14.1% of total revenues for the three months and 13.0% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to 11.7% and 13.5% for the same periods in fiscal 2005. Systems development and programming costs recognized increased by 74.9%, or $1.6 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2006,and increased 28.5%, or $2.0 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. These increases were the result of higher payroll expense and allocated overhead cost including the acquisition of Outtask, partially offset by an increase in
capitalized systems development and programming cost. Share-based compensation was approximately $0.2 million for the three months and approximately $0.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Excluding the impact of
share-based compensation expenses, which the company began recording October 1, 2005 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard 123R, systems development and programming represented 13.5% of total revenues for the three months and 12.6%
for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 11.7% and 13.5% for the same periods in fiscal 2005.

In response to growing
demand for our subscription services, we have focused on the development and programming of internal-use software used to provide these services. Under generally accepted accounting principles, costs for corporate software developed or obtained for
internal use are required to be capitalized and amortized over their useful lives of three to five years. Gross internal use software costs capitalized were $1.9 million and $1.2 million for the quarter ended and $4.8 million and $2.5 million for
the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Depreciation of internal use software costs totaled $0.6 million and $0.2 million for the quarter ended and $1.4 and $0.3 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.

We anticipate that recognized systems development and programming costs in fiscal 2006 will increase in absolute dollars
compared to fiscal 2005 driven primarily by our acquisition of Outtask and our continued focus on product innovation and enhancement.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and related expenses (including share-based compensation), and allocated overhead costs, all associated with employees and contractors in
finance, human resources, legal, information technology, facilities, and, to a lesser extent, costs, such as professional fees and public company regulatory compliance costs.

General and administrative expenses were 13.2% of total revenues for the three months and 14.7% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
14.5% and 14.4% for the same periods in 2005. General and administrative expenses increased 31.3%, or $0.8 million, for the three months ending June 30, 2006, and increased 38.4%, or $2.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to the same periods in fiscal 2005. The increases were mainly due to a 64.4%, or $0.9 million, and a 51.7%, or $2.2 million, increase in salaries and related expenses and a (5.3%), or $35,000 decrease and 39.1%, or $0.6 million increase in
overhead costs, respectively. The increases in salaries and related expenses were driven primarily by headcount increases, including expenses associated with the acquisition of Outtask, as well as $0.5 million and $1.1 million in share-based
compensation expense in the three and nine months periods ending June 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of share-based compensation expenses, which we began recording October 1, 2005 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard 123R, cost
of services expenses represented 11.3% of total revenues for the three months and 13.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 14.5% and 14.4% for the same periods in fiscal 2005.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

We expect the absolute dollar amount of general and administrative expenses to increase in fiscal 2006
compared to fiscal 2005 due to increases in personnel costs related to the growth of our business and the acquisition of Outtask.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets represents the allocation of the intangible assets from our July 2002 acquisition of Captura and from our January 2006 acquisition of Outtask. The Captura
intangible asset is being ratably amortized as a non-cash charge to operations over five years, consistent with the timing and level of the expected cash flows from the underlying acquired customer contracts. The Outtask intangible assets are being
amortized as non-cash charges to operations over one to thirteen years, consistent with the timing and level of expected cash flows attributed to customer relationships, use of acquired technology, trade name and trademarks, and non-compete
agreements.

Interest Income and Interest Expense



|                       |  |                             |      |   |                            |   |    |        |  |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |        |     |   |  |      |  
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ---- | - | -------------------------- | - | -- | ------ |  | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ------ | --- | - |  | ---- | -
|                       |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |      |   | Nine Months Ended June 30, |  
|(dollars in thousands) |  | 2006                        |      |   | 2005                       |   |    | Change |  |      | 2006 |  |   | 2005 |   |  | Change |    
|Interest income        |  | $                           | 130  |   |                            | $ | 69 |        |  | 88.4 | %    |  | $ | 365  |   |  | $      | 261 |   |  | 39.8 | %
|Interest expense       |  |                             | (369 | ) |                            |   | (1 | )      |  | NM   |      |  |   | (588 | ) |  |        | (5  | ) |  | NM   |  

NM = Not Meaningful

Interest Income and Interest Expense. The increase in interest income in the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the
same periods in fiscal 2005 reflects higher short term interest rates and more funds invested in interest bearing accounts in 2006 than in 2005. The increase in interest expense in the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2006, compared
to the same periods in fiscal 2005 was due to debt financing we are utilizing to partially fund the acquisition of Outtask.

Provision
for Income Taxes. For the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an income tax benefit of $29.1 million and $29.0 million related to operating results and the release of reserves against deferred tax assets, as
compared to no income tax expense reported for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2005. The company had previous recorded $0.1 million in income tax expense for the three month periods ended December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, we had deferred tax assets of $108.3 million, partially offset by a valuation allowance of $79.2 million related to federal state and foreign net operating losses and other timing differences, leaving us with $29.1 million
in net deferred tax assets.

As future profitability is not assured, any future reduction of the valuation allowance and our future
effective tax rate are uncertain. In determining net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of domestic and foreign profitability, the timing and extent of the
utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methodologies and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

Financial Condition

Our total assets were $170.5 million at June 30, 2006 and $60.7 million at September 30,
2005, representing an increase of $109.8 million or 180.9%. This increase was due to an increase in goodwill totaling $55.2 million, deferred income tax asset, net of $29.1 million, net intangible assets totaling $8.6 million, accounts receivable
totaling $7.1 million, and an increase in capital expenditures of $7.3 million. The increase in net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2006 was the result of our determination that a full valuation reserve against our total deferred tax assets was
not required. Excluding the increase in net deferred tax assets, the increases in total assets were principally related to the acquisition of Outtask and growth in our business. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $17.1 million at June 30,
2006 and $16.2 million as of September 30, 2005, representing an increase of $0.9 million, or 5.5%. Net property and equipment increased to $19.8 million at June 30, 2006 from $15.0 million at September 30, 2005, with the largest
increase due to a $4.8 million investment in development costs for software used internally for our subscription services offerings. Our cash flow activity is described in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.

Accounts receivable balances, net of allowances of $1.4 million and $0.8 million, were $19.5 million and $12.4 million as of June 30,
2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, representing a net increase of $7.1 million or 57.3%. The increase in the allowance for the period of $0.6 million was based upon an increase in accounts receivable and an increase in the allowance for
specific customer receivables, both related to the growth in related revenues.

Our total liabilities were $58.3 million and $30.0 million
at June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $28.3 million, or 94.3%. This increase was mainly due to the use of debt in the amount of $16.8 million to fund the acquisition of Outtask Incorporated.
Other accrued liabilities were $6.5 million and $2.4 million at June



21



---

##### Table of Contents

30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. The increase in other accrued liabilities of $4.2 million or 175.0% was the result of remaining
holdbacks, of which $3.9 million related to the acquisition of Outtask. Total deferred revenues, including both current and long term, increased by $4.5 million to $25.0 million at June 30, 2006 from $20.5 million at September 30, 2005.
These increases resulted from growth in our customer base for our subscription services offerings over the period and as a result of deferred revenue related to Cliqbook customers added by Outtask after consummation of the acquisition.

Our common stock and additional paid in capital totaled $283.4 million at June 30, 2006, compared to $235.1 million at September 30, 2005,
an increase of $48.3 million, or 20.6%. This increase was primarily due to issuance of $39.9 million in common stock and stock options related to the acquisition of Outtask and to a lesser extent by $4.8 million in proceeds received from the
exercise of stock options under our share-based compensation plans and ESPP during the nine months ended June 30, 2006.

Liquidity and Capital
Resources

Our available sources of liquidity as of June 30, 2006 consisted principally of cash and cash equivalents totaling $17.1
million. We also have a revolving credit line and equipment purchase facility available, which is discussed in more detail below.

Our
operating cash inflows consist of payments received from our subscription and on-premise customers. Our operating cash outflows consist of employee salaries, payments to vendors directly related to subscription and on-premise services, payments
under arrangements with third parties who provide hosting infrastructure services in connection with our subscription services offerings, related sales and marketing and administrative costs, and systems development and programming costs. Operating
activities provided $8.9 million and $8.1 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Our investing
activities used $29.6 million and $10.8 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, consisted principally of $21.9 million paid for the acquisition of
Outtask and $6.4 million for the purchase and internal development of software. Purchases of property and equipment accounted for the remainder. The amount capitalized for the development of software used internally is described in more detail above
in Results of Operations  Expenses  Systems Development and Programming Costs.

Our financing activities
provided $21.5 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and used $6.2 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Proceeds from financing activities in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 included $18.0 million from
borrowings and $4.8 million in proceeds from issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options and from our ESPP plan. Payments for financing activities in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 consisted of payments on borrowings and
capital leases.

In March 2002, we entered into a loan and security agreement (Loan Agreement) with a bank for a $1.0 million
equipment credit facility (Term I Advance). The Loan Agreement for the Term I Advance allowed for borrowings in the amount of actual equipment purchases made through December 2002. In September 2003, we amended the terms of the Loan
Agreement to add a revolving line of credit (Revolver) in an amount not to exceed the lesser of 80% of eligible accounts receivable or $5.0 million, with interest at the banks prime rate. In September 2004 and May 2005, we amended
the Loan Agreement further extending the Revolvers availability to December 31, 2006, at which time any advances become due and payable. The other terms of the Revolver remained the same. There were no amounts borrowed under the Revolver
at June 30, 2006.

We also amended the terms of the Loan Agreement in September 2003 to add an additional equipment facility
(Term III Advance) for advances in the amount of actual equipment purchases up to $1.0 million through September 2004, with interest at the banks prime rate, maturing in September 2006. In September 2004 we amended the Loan
Agreement to extend the Term III Advances availability to June 30, 2005, with any amounts borrowed due on June 30, 2007. The other terms of the Term III Advance remain the same. There were no amounts borrowed under the Term III
Advance at June 30, 2006.

In May 2005, we amended the terms of the Loan Agreement to add an additional equipment facility (Term
IV Advance) for advances in the amount of actual equipment purchases up to $2.5 million through May 30, 2006, with interest at the banks prime rate, maturing on May 30, 2008. There were no amounts borrowed under the Term IV
Advance at June 30, 2006.

In January 2006, in connection with the acquisition of Outtask, we entered into an Amended and
Restated Loan and Security Agreement (Amended Loan Agreement) with Comerica Bank (Comerica) in order to increase available borrowing amounts under our existing loan agreement. The Amended Loan Agreement provides for a term
loan of up to $14 million and a revolving line of credit for up to $8 million. At Concurs option, the term loan bears an interest rate equal to Comericas prime rate plus a range of 0.75% to 1.25% or LIBOR plus a range of 3.0% to 3.5%,
and matures December 31,



22



---

##### Table of Contents

2010. In August 2006, we entered into an agreement to extend the maturity date of the line of credit for a period of six months, to July 23, 2007. At
Concurs option, the revolving live of credit bears an interest rate equal to Comericas prime rate plus a range of 0.50% to 1.00% or LIBOR plus a range of 2.75% to 3.25%. There was approximately $16.8 million outstanding under the term
loan and revolver at June 30, 2006.

In January 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program, under which we are
authorized to repurchase up to two million shares of our outstanding common stock over a two-year period expiring in January 2007. Stock repurchases under the 2005 stock repurchase program may be made from time to time in the open market based on
market conditions. Any repurchases will be made at the then-current market prices, and repurchased shares will be retired. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, we repurchased and retired 1,094,494 shares of our outstanding common
stock under the 2005 repurchase program, leaving a balance of 905,506 shares remaining eligible for repurchase. There were no share repurchases executed during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006.

We believe our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our credit facilities, as well as expected positive operating cash flows, will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for normal business operations, working capital needs and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. In the longer term, or if we decide to acquire assets or businesses, we may require
additional funds and may seek to raise such additional funds through private or public sales of debt or equity securities, or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities, strategic relationships, bank debt, lease financing
arrangements, or other available means. There can be no assurances that any such funds will be available or, if available, will be on acceptable terms to meet our business needs. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity
securities, stockholders may experience dilution, or such equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

In June 2006, we filed a form S-3 shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the shelf registration statement,
Concur may issue stock, preferred stock, debt securities, or warrants in an aggregate amount of $150.0 million. We have no current intent to draw down the shelf registration.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

We do not use derivative financial instruments.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances; such estimates and judgments are periodically re-evaluated. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments, or conditions.

The estimates and judgments noted above are affected by our application of accounting policies. Our critical accounting policies are those most important
to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments. Our critical accounting policies include business combinations, share-based compensation expense, revenue
recognition, internal-use software, allowances for accounts receivable, accounting for share-based compensation, and accounting for income taxes.

Business Combinations

We are required to allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. This valuation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to long-lived and intangible assets.

Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets include but are not limited to: future expected cash flows from customer contracts,
customer lists, distribution agreements, and proprietary technology, and non-compete agreements; the acquired companys brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the brand will continue to be used in
the combined companys product portfolio; and discount rates. Managements estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Assumptions may be incomplete
or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Other estimates associated with the accounting for these acquisitions may change as additional
information becomes available regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Revenue Recognition

We generate our revenues from the delivery of subscription services (which include software maintenance services), consulting services, and the sale of
software licenses. We recognize revenues in accordance with accounting standards for software and service companies.

We recognize revenue
when:



| |  |  | evidence of an arrangement exists;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | delivery has occurred;
| | - |  | ----------------------



| |  |  | the fees are fixed or determinable; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | collection is considered probable.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------

If collection is not
considered probable, we recognize revenues when the fees are collected. If the fees are not fixed or determinable, we recognize revenues as payments become due from the customer. Accordingly, our judgment as to the probability of collection and
determinability of fees may materially affect the timing of our revenue recognition and results of operations. If non-standard acceptance periods or non-standard performance criteria are required, we recognize revenue upon the expiration of the
acceptance period or satisfaction of the acceptance/performance criteria, as applicable.

In contractual arrangements that include the
provision of multiple elements, we apply the accounting guidance most applicable to the specific arrangement to determine how contract consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate elements in the arrangement. Multiple element
arrangements require the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. Generally, separate contracts with the same customer that are entered into at or near the same time are presumed to have been negotiated
together and, therefore, are accounted for as a single contractual arrangement in determining how contract consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate elements in the arrangement. Typically, we measure and allocate the total
arrangement fee among each of the elements based on their fair value or, if necessary, vendor-specific objective evidence of their fair value (VSOE). VSOE is determined by the price charged when an element is sold separately or, in the
case of an element not yet sold separately, the price set by authorized management, if it is probable that the price, once established, will not change prior to separate market introduction.

Subscription Revenues

Our
subscription revenues are typically recognized monthly as the service is provided to the customer and consist of:



| |  |  | monthly fees paid for subscription services;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amortization of related set-up fees;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | amortization of fees paid for software maintenance services under software license arrangements; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the amortized portion of the related license and consulting fees in certain multiple element subscription arrangements where VSOE does not exist for an undelivered subscription
element.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Set-up fees paid by customers in connection with subscription services, as well as the associated direct and
incremental costs, such as labor and commissions, are deferred and recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, or the expected lives of the customer relationships, which generally range from two to five years. For those subscription
service offerings that have been commercially available for only a short period of time, the contractual lives are used as the best estimate of the expected lives of the customer relationships. We continue to evaluate and adjust the length of these
amortization periods as we gain more experience with customer contract renewals and contract cancellations. It is possible that, in the future, the estimates of expected customer lives may change and, if so, the periods over which such subscription
set-up fees and costs are amortized will be adjusted. Any such change in estimated expected customer lives will affect our future results of operations.

Software maintenance services include technical support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades and enhancements on a when-and-if available basis. Fees for software maintenance services are typically billed
annually in advance of performance of the services with provisions for subsequent automatic annual renewals. We defer the related revenues and recognize them ratably over the respective maintenance terms, which typically are one year.

Subscription revenues are adjusted for estimated sales allowances, which are based on our historical experience, including a review of our experience
related to price adjustments and sales credits issued.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Consulting and Other Revenues

Consulting revenues consist of fees for professional services, which consist of system implementation and integration, planning, data conversion,
training, and documentation of procedures. Consulting service fees are typically billed and recognized as revenue on a time-and-materials basis. In some instances, we sell consulting services under milestone or fixed-fee contracts and, in such
cases, recognize consulting revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis. Consulting revenues are adjusted for estimated sales allowances, which are based on our historical experience, including a review of our experience related to price
adjustments and sales credits issued.

In service arrangements that include consulting and subscription services, but not a license of our
software, we recognize consulting revenues as they are performed if the consulting services qualify as a separate unit of accounting within the arrangement. The consulting services qualify as a separate unit of accounting if they have value to the
customer on a stand-alone basis, there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the subscription services, and delivery or performance of the subscription services is considered probable and substantially within our control. We have
determined that, in our service arrangements of this type, the consulting services typically qualify as a separate unit of accounting and, accordingly, the consulting revenues are recognized as the services are performed. If the consulting services
do not qualify as a separate unit of accounting, the related revenues are combined with the subscription revenues, and recognized ratably over the subscription service period. Our judgment as to whether the consulting services qualify as a separate
unit of accounting may materially affect the timing of our revenue recognition and our results of operations.

Other revenues consist of
fees earned from, and allocable to, grants of licenses to use our software products. We recognize license revenues when evidence of a license arrangement exists, we have delivered the software, the amount of the transaction is fixed or determinable,
collection is probable, and VSOE exists for any undelivered elements of the arrangement. Elements included in our multiple-element software arrangements consist of various licensed software products and services such as software maintenance
services, consulting services, and subscription services.

In software license arrangements that include rights to multiple elements, we
allocate the total arrangement fee among each of the elements using the residual method, under which revenues are allocated to undelivered elements based on VSOE and the residual amounts of revenue are allocated to the delivered elements. If
sufficient VSOE does not exist for the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until the earlier of the point at which such sufficient VSOE does exist or all elements of the
arrangement have been delivered. If the only undelivered element is software maintenance, the entire fee is recognized ratably as subscription revenue. We are required to exercise judgment in deciding how to interpret the evidence of fair value to
determine the allocation of arrangement consideration with respect to a given element, and in determining whether an established price is likely to change prior to separate market introduction. These judgments may materially affect the timing of our
revenue recognition and results of operations.

In software license arrangements where we also provide consulting services, license
revenues are recognized upon delivery of the software, provided that the criteria for recognition of software license revenues described above are met, payment of the license fees is not dependent upon the performance of the consulting services, and
the consulting services are not essential to the functionality of the software. If we determine that the consulting services are essential to the functionality of the software, or payment of the license fees is dependent upon the performance of the
consulting services, then both the license and consulting fees are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. We typically do not consider the consulting services we provide in such arrangements to be essential to the functionality of the
software and, therefore, license revenues are typically recognized upon delivery of the software and consulting revenues are recognized as the services are performed. Accordingly, our judgment as to whether consulting services should be considered
essential to the functionality of the licensed software may materially affect the timing of our revenue recognition and results of operations.

In arrangements where we license our software and also host the licensed software for our customer, a software element is only considered present if our customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time
during the hosting period without significant penalty, and it is feasible for our customer to either operate the software on its own hardware or contract with another vendor to host the software. If the arrangement meets these criteria, as well as
the other criteria for recognition of license revenues described above, we deem there to be software element present and recognize license revenues when the software is delivered, and we recognize the subscription hosting revenues as the hosting
service is provided. Hosting set-up fees for such arrangements, as well as the associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and recognized ratably over the hosting service period. If we determine that a separate software element as
described above is not present, we combine the software license fees with the subscription hosting fees and recognize them ratably over the subscription service period, as subscription revenue. Our judgment as to whether we meet the criteria above
could have a material affect on the timing and mix of our revenue recognition and on our results of operations.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Portions of our revenues are generated from sales made through our reseller partners. When we assume a
majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations, we record the revenues on a gross basis, and amounts paid to our reseller partners are recognized as cost of operations. Our assumption of such business risks
is evidenced when, among other things, we take responsibility for delivery of the product or service, establish pricing of the arrangement, and are the primary obligor in the arrangement. When our reseller partner assumes the majority of the
business risks associated with the performance of the contractual obligations, we record the associated revenues net of the amounts paid to our reseller partner. Our judgment as to whether we have assumed the majority of the business risks
associated with performance of the contractual obligations materially affects how we report revenues and cost of operations.

Internal-Use Software

We capitalize certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with AICPA SOP 98-1, Accounting for the
Costs of Corporate Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1). We capitalize software development costs when application development begins and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will
be used as intended. Costs associated with preliminary project stage activities, training, maintenance and all other post implementation stage activities are expensed as incurred. Our policy provides for the capitalization of certain payroll and
payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with internal use computer software projects, as well as external direct costs of materials and services associated with developing or obtaining internal use software. Capitalizable
personnel costs are limited to the time directly spent on such projects. Capitalized costs are ratably amortized, using the straight-line method, over the estimated useful lives of the related applications which typically range from three to five
years. Our judgment as to which costs to capitalize, when to begin capitalizing such costs, and what period to amortize the costs over, may materially affect our results of operations.

Accounts Receivable Allowances

We record provisions for estimated sales allowances against
subscription and consulting revenues in the period in which the related revenues are recorded. We record our sales allowances based on historical experience, including a review of our experience related to price adjustments and sales credits issued.

We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables, and we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts, included in
general and administrative expenses. In estimating allowances for doubtful accounts, we consider specific receivables when collection is doubtful, as well as an analysis of our historical bad debt experience and the current economic environment. If
the data used to estimate the allowance provided for doubtful accounts does not adequately reflect our future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and future results of operations
could be materially affected.

Share-based Compensation

Our stock option program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests. We rely primarily on four stock option
plans that provide broad discretion to our Board of Directors to create appropriate equity incentives for members of our Board of Directors and our employees. On October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, requiring us to recognize
expense related to the fair value of our share-based compensation awards. We elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS 123R. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2006, includes compensation expense for all stock based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions
of SFAS 123, and compensation expense for all stock based compensation awards granted subsequent to October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we
capitalize the portion of our share-based compensation attributed to internally developed software and defer the portion of our share-based compensation associated with activities that generate deferred revenue. Under the provisions of SFAS 123R,
our ESPP is deemed non-compensatory. See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail, including the impact of the adoption to our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Income Taxes

We make certain estimates and judgments
in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for
tax and financial statement purposes.

We assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. We consider all
available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future



26



---

##### Table of Contents

taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If recovery is not likely, we
record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. The available positive evidence at June 30, 2006 included three years of historical operating profits and a projection of future
income. As a result of our analysis of all available evidence, both positive and negative at June 30, 2006, it was considered more likely than not that a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was not required, resulting in the
release of a portion of the valuation allowance previous recorded against our deferred tax assets and generating an $29.1 million tax benefit recorded in our income statement.

As of June 30, 2006, we believe it is more likely than not that the amount of the deferred tax assets recorded on our balance sheet as a result of
the partial release of the valuation allowance would ultimately be recovered. However, should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would increase in the period in which we determine that recovery is
not probable.



|ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks include primarily interest rate and foreign exchange risks.

Interest Rate Risk.We have borrowing arrangements with variable rates of interest. We also maintain cash in highly liquid investment vehicles including money market accounts, which bear interest at variable
overnight or short term rates. Variable interest rate investment and debt exposes us to differences in future cash flows resulting from changes in market interest rates. Variable interest rate risk can be quantified by estimating the change in cash
flows resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates.

As discussed in Note 9 to the Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements, our credit facility bears interest at floating rates we select under the terms of the Amended Loan Agreement. As of June 30, 2006, we had $12.8 million outstanding on our term-loan agreement and $4.0 million outstanding on
our line of credit. Neither of the instruments are hedged with an interest rate swap. On an annual basis, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an approximate $0.2 million change to annual interest expense, based upon net
variable rate borrowings of $16.8 million.

Foreign Currency Risk.We have foreign currency risks related to our revenue and
operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We do not believe movements in the foreign currencies in which we transact will significantly affect future net earnings. Foreign currency risk can be quantified by estimating
the change in cash flows resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates. We believe such a change would not have a material impact on our cash flows of financial instruments that are sensitive to foreign currency exchange
risk.

Derivatives. We do not use derivative financial instruments.



|ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|------- | -----------------------

Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And
Procedures

The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a
companys controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In August 2006, we
determined a deficiency existed in the operation of the Companys internal accounting controls as of June 30, 2006, which constituted a material weakness in our internal controls pursuant to standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board. This deficiency related to the design of controls surrounding the classification of total debt between current and long-term liabilities and resulted in a misclassification of debt between current and long-term on the
face of the balance sheet for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. We reported this deficiency to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
our Chief Financial Officer, and based on the material weakness noted above, that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the purpose described above as of the end of the period covered by this report.

In light of the deficiency described above, we have performed additional analysis and reviews to provide reasonable assurance that the classification of
debt between current and long-term is stated correctly on the face of the balance sheet for this Form 10-Q in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is implementing new internal controls to remedy this deficiency,
including additional balance sheet reviews and the use of a more comprehensive financial disclosure checklist.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require public companies, including our company, to evaluate any change in internal control
over financial reporting, which is defined as a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. In connection with their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer did not identify any
change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three month period ended June 30, 2006 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitation On Effectiveness Of Controls

It should be
noted that any system of controls, including disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
system are met. The design of any control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs. Our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and
the actual effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is described above.

Control systems can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------

In July 2001, we and several of
our current and former officers were named as defendants in two securities class-action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In April 2002, these lawsuits were consolidated along with more than
300 similar pending cases filed against companies that completed initial public offerings between 1997 and 2000 and the underwriters that took them public. In October 2002, the court dismissed the individual present and former officers of Concur
named as defendants from the consolidated lawsuit, without prejudice, pursuant to a stipulated agreement between the parties. In February 2003, the presiding judge denied a motion to dismiss all claims. In July 2003, we decided to participate in a
proposed settlement negotiated by representatives of a coalition of issuers named as defendants in similar actions and their insurers. Although we believe that the plaintiffs claims have no merit, we decided to participate in the proposed
settlement to avoid the cost and distraction of continued litigation. We do not believe that the proposed settlement will have any material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. The proposed settlement is
expected to be funded by a group of insurers on behalf of the issuer defendants. The proposed settlement agreement would dispose of all remaining claims against us and the individual defendants, without any admission of wrongdoing by us or the
individual defendants. The proposed settlement has been preliminarily approved by the court, but remains subject to final approval by the parties and the court. There is no guarantee that the parties or the court will finalize the proposed
settlement. Should the parties and the court fail to finalize the proposed settlement, we would continue to defend ourselves vigorously.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

We operate in a dynamic and rapidly
changing business environment that involves substantial risk and uncertainty. The following discussion augments and should be read in conjunction with the Risk Factors included in Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 and, collectively, addresses the risks and uncertainties that could cause, or contribute to causing, actual results to differ materially from expectations. In evaluating our business, readers should pay
particular attention to the descriptions of risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as updated by the discussion below and in other sections of this report and our other
filings with the SEC.

We Only Recently Acquired Outtask, So It Is Difficult To Determine What Its Impact On Our Financial Results Will Be.

We completed our acquisition of Outtask on January 23, 2006, so we have only a very limited operating history on which to base
an evaluation of our combined business and prospects. Our future success will depend on many factors that are not under our control, such as the following:



| |  |  | successful integration of Outtask service and personnel with our offerings and business;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | growth in demand for our suite of services, and competitive pressures;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the perceived security of our services, technology, infrastructure and practices; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



28



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | the significant lead times before a new product, service or enhancements, including those that will be added through the acquisition Outtask, begin generating revenues.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To address these risks we must, among other things:



| |  |  | successfully market our suite of services to new and existing customers;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | attract, integrate, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | respond to competitive developments; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | successfully introduce new services and enhancements to existing services to address changing market conditions.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We May Have Difficulties Integrating Outtask With Our Business Operations, And The Costs We Incur May Be High.

We may experience difficulties integrating the personnel, products, technologies and operations of Outtask. Those difficulties include:



| |  |  | the need to manage more geographically-dispersed operations, such as Outtasks operations in the State of Virginia;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the difficulty of incorporating acquired technologies into our operations infrastructure;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of Outtask; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies across the larger organization.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we are unable to address any of these risks successfully, our business could be harmed. Additionally, there is risk that we may incur additional
expenses associated with an impairment of a portion of goodwill and other intangible assets due to changes in market conditions for acquisitions. Under generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to evaluate goodwill for impairment on
an annual basis and to evaluate other intangible assets as events or circumstances indicate that such assets may be impaired. These evaluations could result in impairments of goodwill or other intangible assets.

If We Acquire Additional Companies, Products, Or Technologies, We Expect To Face Risks Associated With Those Acquisitions.

In the future, we may acquire additional companies or make investments in other companies, products, or technologies. We may not realize the anticipated
benefits of our prior or future acquisitions or investments to the extent that we anticipate, or at all. We may have to incur additional debt or issue additional equity securities to pay for future acquisitions or investments, the issuance of which
could be dilutive to our existing stockholders. If any acquisition or investment is not perceived as improving our earnings per share, our stock price may decline. In addition, we may incur non-cash amortization charges from acquisitions, which
could harm our operating results. Any completed acquisitions would also require significant integration efforts, diverting our attention from our business operations and strategy.

Because Sales Of Our Concur Expense Solution Accounts For More Than 95% Of Our Total Revenues, A Material Decrease In Demand For These Solutions Would Substantially Harm Our Results Of Operations.

We generated more than 95% of our total revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, and for all of fiscal
2005, from our Concur Expense services and software. We expect such services and software to continue to contribute a similar percentage of our total revenues for the foreseeable future. Our future financial performance and revenue growth is
dependent upon continued market acceptance of our Concur Expense solutions, and our revenues would decline significantly if, for example, our competitors, some of which have substantially greater resources than us, develop expense management
products that achieve greater market acceptance, or we do not keep up with technological advancements in software platforms, delivery models or product features. There can be no assurance that our services and software solutions will continue to
maintain widespread market penetration or that we will continue to derive significant revenues from sales of such solutions in the future.

We Depend
On A Subscription Service Business Model That Continues To Evolve, Which Makes Our Business Operations And Prospects Difficult To Evaluate.

Our subscription revenues are based on a business model that has a limited history and continues to evolve, and is therefore subject to a number of risks, including, without limitation:



| |  |  | an increasing reliance on a relatively novel revenue model for our industry;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a reduction in our license revenues as we focus on building our subscription business;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



29



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | lower gross margins and higher fixed costs associated with our subscription business, as compared to our license business;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | unpredictable sales cycles; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------



| |  |  | the possibility of subscription cancellations.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------

Our
subscription services delivery models have continued to evolve, and we anticipate that our future financial performance and revenue growth will largely depend upon the growth of our subscription services. Our subscription revenues represented 83.3%
and 81.5% of total revenues in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, and we depend substantially on outsourced subscription services delivery models for our anticipated revenues and cash flows. We believe that subscription revenues
will continue to represent a significant percentage of our total revenues and that our future financial performance and revenue growth will depend, in large part, upon the growth in customer demand for our outsourced subscription services delivery
models. As a result, we have invested significantly in infrastructure, operations, and strategic relationships to support these models, which represent a significant departure from traditional software delivery strategies. The relatively short
history and continued evolution of this business model makes our business operations and prospects difficult to evaluate.

Our increased
strategic focus on growing our subscription business has contributed to a substantial reduction in our software license revenues in recent years. The limited history of our subscription business model makes it difficult to predict whether demand for
subscription services will continue. If demand for our subscription services declines, we may not be able to generate sufficient license revenues to offset any decrease in subscription services revenues.

If our subscription services business does not grow sufficiently, our cost of revenues may exceed such revenues, which could harm our operating results.
Our costs of providing subscription services are relatively fixed in the short-term, so we may not be able to adjust our expenses quickly enough to offset any potential slowdown in subscription sales. In addition, any delays in implementation may
prevent us from recognizing subscription revenue for indeterminate periods of time, even when we have already incurred costs relating to the implementation of our subscription services. Further, we may experience unanticipated increases in costs
associated with providing our subscription services and software maintenance services to customers over the term of our customer contracts as a result of inaccurate internal cost projections or other factors, which may harm our operating results.
Additionally, some of our subscription services contracts contain cancellation provisions, and, if cancelled, could result in us recognizing substantially less revenue than the aggregate value of those contracts over their terms. If a customer
cancels or otherwise seeks to terminate a subscription or maintenance agreement prior to the end of its term, or if we are unable to renew such an agreement at the end of its term, our operating results in future periods could be substantially
harmed.

We Depend On Consulting Revenues, Which May Fluctuate Or Decline.

Our consulting revenues represented 13.4% and 15.6% of total revenues in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. We anticipate
that consulting revenues will continue to represent a significant component of our total revenues. The level of consulting revenues depends largely upon demand for our consulting services, which consist of system implementation and integration,
planning, data conversion, training, and documentation of procedures. Our consulting revenues could fluctuate or decline to the extent sales or upgrades of our subscription services and/or software licenses fluctuate or decline or if third-party
organizations such as systems integrators compete with us for the installation or servicing of our offerings. Our ability to increase consulting revenues will depend in large part on our ability to increase the scale of our consulting organization,
including our ability to recruit and train a sufficient number of qualified consulting personnel.

We Face Significant Competition From Companies
That Have Longer Operating Histories And Greater Resources Than We Do, And Our Business Will Suffer If We Fail To Compete Effectively.

The market for our solutions is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. The direct competition we face depends on the market segment focus and delivery model capabilities of our competitors. We also face indirect competition from
potential customers internal development efforts and, at times, have to overcome their reluctance to move away from existing paper-based systems. Our principal direct competition comes from independent vendors of Corporate Expense Management
software and services, as well as financial institutions and ERP vendors that sell products similar to ours along with their suites of other products and services. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater financial,
technical, marketing, and other resources, greater name recognition, and a larger total number of customers for their products and services than we do. Some of our competitors, particularly major financial institutions and ERP vendors, have
well-established relationships with our current and potential customers as well as with systems integrators and other vendors and service providers. These competitors may also be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and
changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of their products, than us. In addition, we anticipate the entrance of new competitors in the future. Increased competition may result in price
reductions,



30



---

##### Table of Contents

reduced gross margins, and change in market share and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We Depend Upon Strategic Relationships With Third Parties And Our Revenues Will Decline If We Cannot Continue To Sustain And Develop These
Relationships.

We depend on strategic reseller and referral relationships to offer products and services to a larger customer base
than we can reach through direct sales, telesales, and internal marketing efforts. If we were unable to maintain our existing strategic relationships or enter into additional strategic relationships, we would have to devote substantially more
resources to the distribution, sales, and marketing of our products and services, which would increase our costs and decrease our revenues. Our success depends in part on the ultimate success of our strategic reseller and referral partners and their
ability to market our products and services successfully. Our existing strategic referral partners are not obligated to refer any potential customers to us. In addition, some of these third parties have entered, and may continue to enter, into
strategic relationships with our competitors. Further, many of our strategic partners have multiple strategic relationships, and they may not regard us as significant for their businesses. Our strategic partners may terminate their respective
relationships with us, pursue other partnerships or relationships, or attempt to develop or acquire products or services that compete with our products or services. Our strategic partners also may interfere with our ability to enter into other
desirable strategic relationships.

We Depend On Our Relationships With Travel Suppliers And Any Adverse Changes In These Relationships Could
Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition And Results Of Operations.

As a result of our acquisition of Outtask, an
important component of our business success will depend on our ability to maintain existing, as well as build new, relationships with travel suppliers. Adverse changes in existing relationships, or our inability to enter into new arrangements with
these parties on favorable terms, if at all, could reduce the amount, quality and breadth of attractively priced travel products and services that we are able to offer, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.

If Our Customers Have Concerns Over The Scalability Or Security Of Our Products, They May Not Continue To Buy Our Products And Our
Revenues Will Decline.

If customers determine that our subscription services offerings are not sufficiently scalable, do not
provide adequate security for the dissemination of information over the Internet or corporate extranets, or are otherwise inadequate for Internet or extranet use or if, for any other reason, our customers decide not to accept our subscription
services for use, our business will be harmed. As part of our subscription services, we receive credit card, travel booking, employee, purchasing, supplier, and other financial and accounting data, through the Internet or extranets, and there can be
no assurance that this information will not be subject to computer break-ins, theft, and other improper activity that could jeopardize the security of information for which we are responsible. Any such lapse in security could expose us to
litigation, loss of customers, damage to our reputation, or otherwise harm our business.

In addition, any person who is able to circumvent
our security measures could misappropriate proprietary or confidential customer information or cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to incur significant costs to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused
by breaches. Any general concern regarding security in the marketplace could deter customers or prospects from using the Internet to conduct transactions that involve transmitting confidential information. Our failure to prevent security breaches,
or well-publicized security breaches affecting the Internet in general, could significantly harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Privacy Concerns Are Increasing, Which Could Result In Regulatory Changes That May Harm Our Business.

Personal
privacy has become a significant issue in the United States and many other countries in which we operate. The United States and various other countries have recommended restrictions on, or taken actions to restrict, the use of personal information
by those collecting such information. Any new or existing privacy laws, if applicable to our business, could impose additional costs and could limit our use and disclosure of such information. If such privacy laws were deemed to apply to us, we may
be required to change our activities and revise or eliminate our services, which could significantly harm our business.

Interruption Of Our
Operations Could Prevent Us From Delivering Our Products And Services To Our Customers, Which Could Significantly Harm Our Business.

Significant portions of our operations depend on our ability to protect our computer equipment and the information stored in our computer equipment, offices, and hosting facilities against damage from earthquake, floods, fires, power loss,
telecommunications failures, unauthorized intrusion, and other events. We back up software and related data files regularly



31



---

##### Table of Contents

and store the back-up files at various off-site locations. However, there can be no assurance that our disaster preparedness will eliminate the risk of
extended interruption of our operations.

We have engaged third-party hosting facility providers to provide the hosting facilities and
related infrastructure for our subscription services. These hosting facilities are located in several locations in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. We do not control the operation of these hosting facilities. Despite precautions
taken at these facilities, the occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision by one of our hosting providers to close a facility without adequate notice to us, or other unanticipated problems at these facilities could result in lengthy interruptions
in our services. We also retain third-party telecommunications providers to provide Internet and direct telecommunications connections for our services. Any of these third-party providers may fail to perform their obligations adequately. Any damage
to, or failure of, our systems could result in interruptions in our service and/or litigation. Interruptions in our service may reduce our revenue, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their subscriptions and
adversely affect our renewal rates. Our business will be harmed if our customers and potential customers believe our service is unreliable.

We
Utilized Financing To Fund The Acquisition Of Outtask, And We May Require Additional Financings To Fund Operations Or Growth In The Future, Each of Which Could Subject Us To Additional Risks.

On January 24, 2006, Concur incurred indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $14 million under the Amended Loan Agreement
with Comerica Bank. This indebtedness was used to finance the cash portion of the total merger consideration paid at the closing of acquisition of Outtask, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the acquisition. In the future, we may be
required to seek additional financing to fund our operations or growth. Factors such as the commercial success of our existing services and products, the timing and success of any new services and products, the progress of our systems development
and programming efforts, our results of operations and cash flows, the use of cash in our stock repurchase program, the status of competitive services and products, and the timing and success of potential strategic alliances or potential
opportunities to acquire or sell businesses or assets may require us to seek additional funding sooner than we expect. There is no assurance that such funding will be available on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we raise additional
funds through the issuance of equity securities or debt convertible into equity securities, the percentage of stock ownership by our existing stockholders would be reduced. In addition, such securities could have rights, preferences, and privileges
senior to those of our current stockholders. If adequate funds were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to achieve or sustain positive cash flows, maintain current operations, fund any potential growth, take advantage of unanticipated
opportunities, develop or enhance services or products, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.

Compliance
With New Regulations Governing Public Company Corporate Governance And Reporting Is Uncertain And Expensive.

Many new laws,
regulations, and standards, notably those adopted by the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market, impose new obligations on public companies in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, such as ours, which have increased the scope, complexity, and
cost of corporate governance, reporting, and disclosure practices and have created uncertainty for companies such as ours. These new laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of
specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated
by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our continuing preparation for and implementation of these reforms and enhanced new disclosures has resulted in, and will likely continue to result in, increased general and administrative
expenses and a significant diversion of managements time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our efforts to comply with regulations regarding our internal control over financial reporting
will likely continue to require us to commit significant financial and managerial resources. If we are not able to prepare for and implement the reforms required by new laws, regulations, and standards, our business, operating results, and financial
condition could be harmed. Further, these laws, regulations, and standards may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members to serve on our board of directors and to attract and retain qualified executive officers, which
could harm our business.

The Growth Of The International Component Of Our Business Subjects Us To Additional Risks Associated With Foreign
Operations.

Our international operations, which are subject to risks associated with operating outside of the United States, are
becoming an increasingly important component of our business. Revenues from customers outside the United States represented approximately $2.7 million and $7.9 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006. These international
operations are subject to many difficulties and incremental costs, including:



| |  |  | costs of customizing products for foreign countries;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | laws and business practices favoring local competitors;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



32



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | uncertain regulation of electronic commerce;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | compliance with multiple, conflicting, and changing governmental laws and regulations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | longer sales cycles;
| | - |  | --------------------



| |  |  | greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | import and export restrictions and tariffs;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | potentially weaker protection for our intellectual property than in the United States, and practical difficulties in enforcing such rights abroad;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties staffing and managing foreign operations;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | multiple conflicting tax laws and regulations; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | political and economic instability.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------

Our international
operations also face foreign currency-related risks. To date, most of our revenues have been denominated in United States dollars, but we believe that an increasing portion of our revenues will be denominated in foreign currencies. We currently do
not engage in foreign exchange hedging activities and, therefore, our international revenues and expenses are currently subject to the risks of foreign currency fluctuations. In addition, our ability to expand into international markets will depend
on our ability to develop and support services and products that incorporate the tax laws, accounting practices, and currencies of applicable countries.

Our international operations also increase our exposure to international laws and regulations. If we are unable to comply with foreign laws and regulations, which are often complex and subject to variation and
unexpected changes, we could incur unexpected costs and potential litigation. For example, the governments of foreign countries might attempt to regulate our services and products or levy sales or other taxes relating to our activities. In addition,
foreign countries might impose tariffs, duties, price controls or other restrictions on foreign currencies or trade barriers, any of which could make it more difficult for us to conduct our business in international markets.

We intend to continue to expand our international sales and marketing activities and enter into relationships with additional international distribution
partners. We are in the early stages of developing our indirect distribution channels in markets outside the United States. We may not be able to attract and retain distribution partners that will be able to market our products effectively.

Our Quarterly Revenues And Operating Results May Fluctuate In Future Periods And We May Fail To Meet Expectations Of Investors And Public Market
Analysts, Which Could Cause The Market Price Of Our Common Stock To Be Volatile Or To Decline.

Our revenues and operating results
may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied on as an indication of our future performance. If quarterly revenues or
operating results fall below the expectations of investors or public market analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Factors that might cause quarterly fluctuations in our operating results include:



| |  |  | developments in the integration of Outtask;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the evolving demand for our services and software;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | spending decisions by our customers and prospective customers;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to manage expenses;
| | - |  | -------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of new product releases;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of large contracts;
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in mix of our services and software offerings;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the mix of sales channels through which our services and software are sold;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | costs of developing new products and enhancements;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to adequately provide services and software; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | global economic and political conditions.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



33



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition, due to the continuing weakness of capital spending for enterprise software and business
services, we believe that many existing and potential customers may reassess or reduce their planned technology and Internet-related investments and defer or reprioritize purchasing decisions. Any such reduction in business spending for technology
could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and operating results. As a result, there is increased uncertainty with respect to our expected revenues.

Our Reported Financial Results May Be Adversely Affected By Changes In Accounting Principles Generally Accepted In The United States.

GAAP is subject to interpretation by the FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC, and various other bodies formed to promulgate and interpret accounting principles. A change in these
principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change. For example, in December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-based Payments, which requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements, with the cost measured based on the
estimated fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. As a result, we are now recording non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, which has a material effect on our results of operations. Further, revenue recognition rules for
software and service companies are complex and require significant interpretation by us. Changes in circumstances, interpretations, or accounting principles or guidance may require us to modify our revenue recognition policies. Such modifications
could impact the timing of revenue recognition and our operating results. See Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations above regarding our critical revenue recognition policies.

Our Lengthy Sales Cycle Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Results.

Because of the high costs involved over a significant period of time, customers for enterprise software and business services typically commit significant
resources to an evaluation of available solutions and require us to expend substantial time, effort, and money educating them about the value of our services and software. Our sales cycle, which is the time between initial contact with a potential
customer and the ultimate sale, is often lengthy and unpredictable. As a result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing and size of specific sales. In addition, customers may delay their purchases from a given quarter to another as they
elect to wait for new product enhancements or due to other factors. Any delay in completing, or failure to complete, sales in a particular quarter or fiscal year could harm our business and could cause our operating results to vary significantly.

Software License Revenues Are Volatile, Which Makes Our Operating Results Difficult To Forecast.

Our software license revenues represented 3.3% of total revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2006. While software license revenues are
diminishing as a percent of total revenues, they continue to contribute to our overall operating results. However, the timing and amounts of license revenues can be difficult to predict, which can lead to variability in operating results. For
example, our licensed software is typically shipped when orders are received, so license backlog at the beginning of any quarter typically represents only a small portion of the quarters expected license revenues. This makes license revenues
in any quarter difficult to forecast because they are determined by orders booked and shipped in that quarter. Moreover, we have historically recognized a substantial percentage of license revenues in the last month of the quarter, frequently in the
last week or even the last days of the quarter, and we expect this trend to continue for as long as our licensed software represents a meaningful part of our overall business. Because our expenses are relatively fixed in the near term, any shortfall
from anticipated revenues or any delay in the recognition of revenues could result in significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. Further, we find it difficult to forecast quarterly license revenues because our sales cycle,
from initial evaluation to delivery of software, is lengthy and varies substantially from customer to customer.

We May Not Successfully Develop Or
Introduce New Products Or Enhancements To Existing Products, Or Successfully Integrate The Outtask Products And Services, So We May Lose Existing Customers Or Fail To Attract New Customers And Our Revenues Would Suffer.

Our future financial performance and revenue growth will depend, in part, upon the successful development, introduction, and customer acceptance of new
and enhanced versions of our products and services, and on our ability to integrate the products and services of Outtask into our existing and future products and services. Our business could be harmed if we fail to deliver enhancements to our
current and future products and services that our customers desire, or fail to integrate Outtasks products and services into our existing and future products. From time to time, we experience delays in the planned release dates of enhancements
to our products and services, and we have discovered errors in new releases after their introduction. New product versions or upgrades may not be released according to schedule, or may contain errors when released. Either situation could result in
adverse publicity, loss of sales, delay in market acceptance of our products and services, or customer claims, including, among other things, warranty claims against us, any of which could harm our



34



---

##### Table of Contents

business. If we do not deliver new product versions, upgrades, or other enhancements to existing products and services on a timely and cost-effective basis,
our business will be harmed. We are also continually seeking to develop new offerings. However, we remain subject to all of the risks inherent in product development, including, without limitation, unanticipated technical or other development
problems, which could result in material delays in product introduction and acceptance or significantly increased costs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop new services or products, or to introduce in a timely
manner and gain acceptance of such new products or services in the marketplace.

If Our Products And Services Do Not Keep Pace With Technological
Change, Our Sales Could Decline And Our Business Could Be Harmed.

We must continually modify and enhance our services and products
to keep pace with changes in hardware and software platforms, database technology, electronic commerce technical standards, and other items. As a result, uncertainties related to the timing and nature of new product announcements or introductions,
or modifications by vendors of operating systems, back-office applications, and browsers and other Internet-related applications, could harm our business.

We Rely On Third-Party Software And Services That May Be Difficult To Replace.

We license or purchase software and
services provided by third parties in order to offer some of our services and software offerings. Such third-party software and services may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The loss or inability to maintain
our rights to use any of these software or services could result in delays in the sale of our services or software offerings until equivalent technology is either developed by us, or, if available, is identified, licensed, and integrated, which
could harm our business.

Our Stock Price Has Experienced High Volatility In The Past, May Continue To Be Volatile, And May Decline.

The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and may do so in the future, as a result of a number of
factors, many of which are outside our control, such as:



| |  |  | the announcement of a merger or acquisition;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | variations in our actual and anticipated operating results;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in our earnings estimates by analysts;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | failure to achieve earnings expectations;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | the volatility inherent in stock prices within the emerging sector within which we conduct business; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the volume of trading in our common stock, including sales upon exercise of outstanding options.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stock markets, particularly the NASDAQ Stock Market, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of many
technology and computer software companies, particularly Internet-related companies. Such fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations could adversely
affect the market price of our common stock.

Further, securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies that
experience periods of volatility in the market prices of their securities. Securities class action litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our managements attention and resources. In July 2001, we and several of our
current and former officers were named as defendants in two securities class-action lawsuits based on alleged errors and omissions concerning underwriting terms in the prospectus for our initial public offering. In April 2002, these lawsuits were
consolidated with more than 300 similar pending cases filed against companies that completed initial public offerings between 1997 and 2000 and the underwriters that took them public. In July 2003, we decided to participate in a proposed settlement
negotiated by representatives of a coalition of issuers named as defendants in similar actions and their insurers. Although we believe that the plaintiffs claims have no merit, we decided to participate in the proposed settlement to avoid the
cost and distraction of continued litigation. The proposed settlement agreement would dispose of all remaining claims against us and the individual present and former officers of Concur named as defendants, without any admission of wrongdoing by us
or the individual defendants. The proposed settlement has been preliminarily approved by the court, but remains subject to final approval by the parties and the court. There is no guarantee that the parties or the court will finalize the proposed
settlement. Should the parties and the court fail to finalize the proposed settlement, we would continue to defend ourselves vigorously. Any liability we incur in connection with this lawsuit could materially harm our business and financial position
and, even if we defend ourselves successfully, there is a risk that managements distraction in dealing with this lawsuit could harm our results.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, Our Business Could Be Harmed.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified personnel, including personnel recently added through
our acquisition of Outtask. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting, motivating, and retaining key personnel. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources
than us for attracting experienced personnel. We also compete for personnel with other software vendors and consulting and professional services companies. Further, recent changes in applicable stock exchange listing standards relating to obtaining
stockholder approval of equity compensation plans could make it more difficult or expensive for us to grant options to employees in the future. We rely on our direct sales force to sell our services and software in the marketplace. We anticipate
increasing our direct sales force. There is significant competition for direct sales personnel with the advanced sales skills and technical knowledge we need. If we were unable to hire or retain competent sales personnel our business would suffer.
In addition, by relying primarily on a direct sales model, we may miss sales opportunities that might be available through other sales channels, such as domestic and international resellers and strategic referral arrangements. Any inability to hire
and retain salespeople or any other qualified personnel, or any loss of the services of key personnel, would harm our business.

Our Ability To
Protect Our Intellectual Property Is Limited And Our Products May Be Subject To Infringement Claims By Third Parties.

Our success
depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology, processes, trade secrets, and other proprietary information, and our ability to protect this information from unauthorized disclosure and use. We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret,
and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions, and other similar measures to protect our proprietary information. We do not own any issued patents. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties
may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary, and third parties may attempt to develop similar technology independently. We provide our licensed customers with access to object code
versions of our software, and to other proprietary information underlying our software. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, particularly because the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate
destination or security of software or other data transmitted. While we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States, and we expect that it will become more difficult to monitor use of our products as we increase our international presence. There can
be no assurance that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate, or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology. In addition, there can be no assurance that third parties will not claim infringement by
us with respect to current or future products or other intellectual property rights. Any such claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, over the past several years, we
have made numerous changes in our product names. Although we own registered trademarks in the United States and have filed trademark applications in the United States and in certain other countries, we do not have assurance that our strategy with
respect to our trademark portfolio will be adequate to secure or protect all necessary intellectual property.

Anti-Takeover Effects Of Our Rights
Agreement, Charter Documents, And Delaware Law Could Discourage Or Prevent A Change In Control Of Concur.

We have a shareholder
rights agreement in place, under which our stockholders have special rights, in the form of additional voting and beneficial ownership, in the event that a person or group not approved by the board of directors were to acquire, or to announce the
intention to acquire 15% or more of our outstanding shares. This plan is designed to have the effect of discouraging, delaying or rendering more difficult an acquisition of us that has not been approved by our Board of Directors.

In addition, there are provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions in the Delaware General Corporation Law, that may
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control. For example:



| |  |  | our Board of Directors may, without stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with special voting or economic rights;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights, and, therefore, each of our directors can only be elected by holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a special meeting of stockholders may only be called by a majority of our Board of Directors, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, or our Chief Executive Officer;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our stockholders may not take action by written consent;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, only one of which is elected each year; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | we require advance notice for nominations for election to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



36



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION
|------- | -----------------

On July 24, 2006, we
settled the final working capital holdback for approximately $1.4 million related to our acquisition of Outtask Incorporated with the Outtask stockholder representative. Concur retained the remaining $0.6 million of the working capital holdback,
thereby reducing total preliminary purchase consideration for the acquisition to $66.4 million at June 30, 2006.



|ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS
|------- | --------

(a) The following exhibits are filed as a
part of this report:



|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  |                           |  |          |  |                     |  |               |  |                 
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- |  | -------- |  | ------------------- |  | ------------- |  | ----------------
|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  | Incorporated by Reference
|ExhibitNumber |  | Exhibit Description                                                                                                      |  | Form                      |  | File No. |  | Date ofFirst Filing |  | ExhibitNumber |  | ProvidedHerewith
|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  |                           |  |         
|31.01         |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).                             |  |                          |  |         |  |                    |  |              |  | X               
|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  |                           |  |         
|31.02         |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).                             |  |                          |  |         |  |                    |  |              |  | X               
|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  |                           |  |         
|32.01         |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* |  |                          |  |         |  |                    |  |              |  | X               
|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  |                           |  |         
|32.02         |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* |  |                          |  |         |  |                    |  |              |  | X               

---

|* | This certification is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Concur specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



37



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized to sign on behalf of the registrant and as the principal financial officer thereof.

Dated: August 9, 2006



CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer




38