alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-5452.

#### Abdel Eltayib, Petitioner v. Stephen M. DeWalt, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 314,

181 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6148,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
MHHIICTEPCTBO TPAHCITOPTA POCCHHCKOH <PE,.!J;EPAU,HH**~E~EPA~LHOEArEHTCTBO** B03.JlYlliHOrO TPAHCOOPTA

Our ref Ham N2 

# s. 0.1

-**~f--7/**



# ·-

DearMr. Gretch, -- .· :**·~**

MINISTRY OFTRANSPORT OFTHE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FEDERAL AIR TRANSPORT AGENCY

Date )laTa Mr. PaulL. Gretch 

### c2Pl.**/~** 

# -i"l Director, Office ofInternational Aviation Office ofthe Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### 400 

## 7'h Street, 

### S.W., Room 6402 Washington DC, 20590

In connection with the U.S. Department of Transportation requirements related 

### to foreign air carriers operation of charter flights the Federal 

### Air Transport Agency ofthe 

### Russian Federation would like to inform you of

### the following. Taking into account the type of fifth-freedom operations conducted by Russian cargo carriers to/from the US, the Federal Air Transport Agency 

### of the 

### Russian Federation is ready to 

### accord reciprocal treatment to similar U.S. carrier requests for 

### fifth-freedom authority to transport outsized 

### cargo (as currently defined by DOT) to/from Russia. With kind regards,

Deputy Head

Pocclliit:KBH C))e.llepauHJI Jlenuurpa.r.cKHii npocne1n, Jl, 37, MocKaa, rcn-:\ 125993, TeJieTaiin: 111495 TeJI.: (+7499) 23l-53-9S,**ljta~~:c:** (+7 499) 231-55-35 E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru 37, Leningrad:sky prospect, 125993, Moscow, RussianFederatlon, Teletype: 111495 Tel.: (+7 499) 231-53-95, fax: (+7499) 231-55-35 E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                       663
<INVENTORY>                                      7,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,915
<PP&E>                                          11,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,183
<SALES>                                         34,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,165
<CGS>                                            9,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,248
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3



FIRST AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT



This amendment entered this 4th day of January, 1988 by and between INTERSTATE GENERAL PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP S.P., hereinafter referred to as the "Management Agent" and INTERSTATE BUSINESS CORPORATION (SANTA MARIA SHOPPING CENTER), hereinafter referred to as "IBC," the Owner.

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, Interstate St. Charles, Inc. (SANTA MARIA SHOPPING CENTER) and Interstate General Properties Limited Partnership, S.P. (IGP) entered into a Management Agreement as of January 5, 1987 with respect to the property known as SANTA MARIA SHOPPING CENTER.

WHEREAS, on June 29, 1987 Interstate St. Charles, Inc. changed its name and became Interstate Business Corporation.

WHEREAS, the Management Agent and the Owner desires to further amend the Management Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Management Agreement as follows:

FIRST:  That in addition to the management fee stipulated in Paragraph 5 of the Management Agreement, effective January 1, 1988 the Management Agent will charge the Owner and Owner will reimburse the Management Agent for the cost of finance and accounting material and services which will include but will not be limited to salaries, fringe benefits, state and federal taxes, etc.  Such reimbursement will be paid by Owner to Management Agent on a monthly basis together with the amount of management fee specified above.

SECOND:  Except as modified herein, Management Agent and Owner certify and confirm that all the terms and covenants of the Management Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect and the agreement and its amendment shall be construed and read as one instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Amendment to Management Agreement the day, month and year first above written.



|INTERSTATE GENERAL PROPERTIES |  | INTERSTATE BUSINESS CORPORATION
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|LIMITED PARTNERSHIP S.P.      |  | (OWNER)                        
|(MANAGEMENT AGENT)            |  |                                
|                              |  |                                
|/s/ Rogelio Perez-Guzman      |  | /s/ Donald G. Blakeman         
|Rogelio Perez-Guzman          |  | Donald G. Blakeman             
|Senior Vice President         |  | Executive Vice President
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 6001** 

DAVID EARL JONES ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANTHONY E. RAND; DERRICK WADSWORTH ,
Defendants

- Appellees ,
and

BEVERLY PERDUE; PATRICK L. MCCRORY ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:14

- ct

- 03142

- D )

Submitted : May 25, 2016 Decided: June 14, 2016

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Earl Jones appeals the district court ’ s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones

v. Butler , No. 5:14

- ct

- 03142

- D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015)

. We
deny as unnecessary Jones’ motion for a certif icate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-7673.

#### Robert David Dunn, Petitioner v. David Parker, Warden.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1051,

178 L. Ed. 2d 871,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 965,

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 787.
No. 10-11124.

#### John W. Pieper, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 217,

181 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6745.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10062.

#### Michael A. Diaz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 830, 132 S. Ct. 128,

181 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5505.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*50Same case below, 630 F.3d 1314.
No. 10-8063.

#### Herold George Voice, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1206, 131 S. Ct. 1058,

178 L. Ed. 2d 875,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1054.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 622 F.3d 870.
# Official DoD Component Response

# Sheet2
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

## *DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, June 16, 2015*

*Change 4*

**AP2.1*2*. APPENDIX 2.1*2***

**OTHER CODES**

1

86

APPENDIX 2.11

AP2.12-1	APPENDIX 2.12
EXHIBIT 21
 FERRO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008
 Sovereign Power UnderName Of Subsidiary*
    
    The Laws Of Which OrganizedFerro China Holdings Inc
    
    USAZibo Ferro Performance Materials Company, Limited (70%)
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaFerro Color & Glass Corporation
    
    USAFerro Colores SA de CV
    
    MexicoFerro Electronic Materials Inc
    
    USAFerro Finance Corporation
    
    USAFerro International Services Inc
    
    USAFerro Pfanstiehl Laboratories, Inc
    
    USAFerro Pfanstiehl (Europe) Ltd
    
    United KingdomFerro Argentina SA
    
    ArgentinaMinera Loma Blanca SA
    
    ArgentinaProcesadora de Boratos Argentinos SA
    
    ArgentinaFerro Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaFerro Enamel do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda
    
    BrazilFerro Industrial Products Ltd
    
    CanadaESFEL SA (19%)
    
    EcuadorFerro Holding GmbH
    
    GermanyFerro GmbH
    
    GermanyFerro Magmalor GmbH
    
    GermanyPT Ferro Mas Dinamika (95%)
    
    IndonesiaFerro Japan K.K.
    
    JapanFerro Far East Ltd
    
    Hong KongFerro Far East Company SDN, BHD
    
    MalaysiaFerro Mexicana SA de CV
    
    MexicoFerro B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsFerro (Belgium) Sprl
    
    BelgiumFC France Acquisition Sarl
    
    FranceFerro Couleurs France SA
    
    FrancePT Ferro Ceramic Colors Indonesia (59%)
    
    IndonesiaPT Ferro Additives Asia (75.4%)
    
    IndonesiaFerro France Sarl
    
    FranceFerro Services Sarl
    
    FranceFerro Arnsberg GmbH iL
    
    GermanyFerro (Italia) SrL
    
    ItalySmaltochimica SrL (40%)
    
    ItalyFerro (Holland) BV
    
    The NetherlandsFerro Investments BV
    
    The NetherlandsFerro Industrias Quimicas (Portugal) Lda
    
    PortugalFerro (Suzhou) Performance Materials Co. Ltd
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaFerro Taiwan Ltd
    
    Republic of ChinaDC-Ferro Co., Ltd (50%)
    
    Republic of KoreaFerro Spain SA
    
    SpainGardenia-Quimica SA (36%)
    
    SpainKerajet SA (19.99%)
    
    SpainFerro (Thailand) Co. Ltd
    
    ThailandFerro Cerdec (Thailand) Co. Ltd (49%)
    
    ThailandFerro de Venezuela CA (51%)
    
    VenezuelaFerro (Great Britain) Ltd
    
    United Kingdom
 *
    
    Percentages in parentheses indicate Ferros ownership.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                               ENVIROKARE TECH INC
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Envirokare  Tech, Inc. (the Company)
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, John
Verbicky, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Odyssey
Pictures  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

November 19, 2003

/s/ John W. Verbicky, Jr.
---------------------------
John W. Verbicky, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
#### *State, Respondent, v. Jordan, Petitioner,*

No. 92072-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72892-0-I, May 4, 2015, 2015,187 187 Wn. App. 1022. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
86

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

District of Columbia

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $10.7 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 800

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 7,100

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $391 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $34.1 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $38.3 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $72.4 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 15%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$3.4 $4.2 $5.38 $6.64

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$1.4 $2.0 $2.21 $3.16

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $2.0 $3.1 $3.16 $4.90

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$0.7 $0.9 $1.08 $1.47

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.3 $0.5 $0.54 $0.74

TOTAL $7.8 $10.7 $12.37 $16.91

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
05/12/2023

Dear Tribal Leader:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry (ATSDR) announce an upcoming consultation that will convene leaders from tribal nations, CDC, 

and ATSDR:

CDC Rape Prevention and Education Program Tribal Consultation 

July 12, 2023 2:00–3:30 pm (EDT) 

The consultation will occur virtually via Zoom. To register, please use this registration link. The agenda 

will be available on May 12, 2023 at the CDC Tribal Health website www.cdc.gov/tribal. 

This tribal consultation will provide opportunities for leaders from tribal nations, CDC, and ATSDR to 

have a government-to-government discussion to ensure that the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) 

for new funding from the Rape Prevention and Education (RPE) program is sensitive to the needs and 

concerns of tribal communities, and that the funding opportunity is as effective as possible in preventing 

sexual violence. CDC/ATSDR wants to hear how to best support tribes and tribal communities on RPE 

efforts and addressing injury prevention-related health inequities. 

Your input is very important to us as we work to improve CDC/ ATSDR public health capacity, programs, 

and services and to strengthen partnerships with tribes and American Indian and Alaskan Native 

community organizations. CDC/ATSDR remains committed to respecting tribal sovereignty while working 

together to leverage capacity, expertise, and resources to achieve the greatest impact to prevent sexual 

violence.

Elected tribal officials are encouraged to submit written tribal testimony by 5:00 pm (EDT) on July 24, 

2023, by email to CDC’s Tribal Support mailbox, tribalsupport@cdc.gov, or by mail at the following 

address:

Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances

Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support

1600 Clifton Road, N.E., Mailstop V18-4 

Atlanta, GA 30329-4027

Telephone: (404) 498-0300 

We look forward to the consultation and hope you will be able to participate.

Sincerely,
Christopher M. Jones, PharmD, DrPH, MPH

Director, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
**DoD 4000.25-1-M, November 2005**

**Change 1**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

# AP8.55. APPENDIX 8.55

**NOTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER NONRESPONSE TO MATERIEL OBLIGATION VALIDATION REQUEST**

2

2

APPENDICX 3.55

AP8.55-1

 APPENDIX 8.55
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

THOMAS C. VAUGHAN, DOC #551837, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3687 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 7, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge. LaROSE, Judge.

We affirm the postconviction court's order granting in part and denying in part Thomas Vaughan's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener's error. The judgments in case numbers 02-CF-8680, 8681, 8682, 8857, 8916, and 8917 should reflect that Mr. Vaughan was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAUN CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 310 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of January, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.R.P., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3271 and 4D16-3272

[November 22, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 15CJ001743AMB

and 16CJ000430AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 10-7220.

#### Derrick Allen, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 926,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 179.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 43 So. 3d 690.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano,

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2021

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2021

162251(65) 

MICHELE R. NAGLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MSC: 162251

v COA: 345396

Oakland CC: 2012-803654-DO

KERRY C. NAGLE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on January 19, 2021, is accepted as timely filed.
IS EXTENDED UNTIL

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 

Previous edition is usable

STANDARD FORM 114D (REV. 1-94)

Prescribed by GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-45.3,

SALE OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 

AMENDMENT OF INVITATION FOR BIDS/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 

1. AMENDMENT TO INVITATION FOR BIDS NO.:

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.:

2. EFFECTIVE DATE

PAGE 1 OF PAGES

4. NAME AND ADDRESS WHERE BIDS ARE RECEIVED

5. AMENDMENT OF INVITATION FOR BIDS NO. (See Item 6)

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

THE HOUR AND DATE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS

(LOCAL TIME) DATE

IS NOT EXTENDED, O'CLOCK M

PURCHASER IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

ORIGINAL AND COPIES TO THE ISSUING OFFICE

13. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 14. DATE SIGNED

12. SIGNATURE FOR BIDDER/PURCHASER

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 17. DATE SIGNED

15. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DATED MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT NO. (See Item 8) DATED

The above numbered invitation for bids is amended as set forth in Item 9. Bidders must acknowledge receipt of this amendment unless 

indicated otherwise in item 11 prior to the hour and date specified in the invitation for bids, or as amended, by one of the 

following methods:

(a) By signing and returning copies of this amendment;

(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the bid submitted; or 

(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the invitation for bids and amendment number. 

FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE ISSUING OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE 

SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR BID. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change a bid already submitted, 

such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided such telegram or letter makes reference to the invitation for bids and this 

amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

6. THIS BLOCK APPLIES ONLY TO AMENDMENTS OF INVITATIONS FOR BIDS

7. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

8. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS 

This Supplemental Agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of

9. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Except as provided below all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 5 remain in full force and effect)

3. ISSUED BY

10. BIDDER/PURCHASE NAME AND ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code) 11. BIDDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT