alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM OF CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS


 


 


Reference is made to
that certain Securities Subscription Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2013, pursuant to which [______] (the “Holder”)
purchased and was issued [____] units, each consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share (each, a “Share”), and one warrant granting the Holder the right to purchase one half Share (each, a “Warrant”;
together with a Share, a “Unit”) from Terrapin 3 Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


1.          For
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Holder hereby agrees that, effective
upon the date hereof, the Warrants shall be terminated, cancelled and of no further force or effect.


 


2.          Holder,
together with its successors and assigns, hereby releases and forever discharges the Company, its directors, officers, shareholders,
employees and agents, and their respective successors and assigns, of and from all claims, causes of action, suits and demands
whatsoever which Holder ever had, now has or may in the future have, arising from the Warrants or the cancellation thereof.


 


3.          This
agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which will together constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


4.          This
agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York (without giving effect to principles
of conflicts of laws).


 


5.          As
may be required, the parties will execute and deliver all such further documents, cause to be done all such further acts, and give
all such further assurances as may be necessary or advisable to give full effect to the provisions and intent of this agreement.


 


Dated: ____________, 2014


 


	 	[HOLDER]
	 	 
	 	By: 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
	 	 
	 	TERRAPIN 3 ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By: 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
No. 10-10215.

#### Quinton F. Croom, Petitioner v. Officer Fullen, et al.

565 U.S. 831, 132 S. Ct. 129,

181 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5342.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 711.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Weeks of July 6, 13, 20, and 27, 1998.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of July 6

Thursday, July 9
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed).

Week of July 13--Tentative

Friday, July 17
9:30 a.m.--Public Meeting on Stakeholders' Concerns (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: Annette Vietti-Cook, 301-415-1969).
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public meeting) (if needed).

Week of July 20--Tentative

Tuesday, July 21
1:30 p.m.--Meeting with Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) 
(Public Meeting) (Contact: John Larkins, 301-415-7360).
3:00 p.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed).

Week of July 27--Tentative

Wednesday, July 29
2:00 p.m.--Briefing on Operating Reactors and Fuel Facilities (Public 
Meeting) (Contact: Glenn Tracy, 301-415-1725).
4:00 p.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed).
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (Recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:

http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition, distribution of 
this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are 
interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule 
electronically, please send an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86f1ebeec6e8f4e5a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c4b51547c524e5f125b534a">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e7e8f4c3edf1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6d2ddc1f6d8c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy, Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18123 Filed 7-2-98; 3:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-317-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets 
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume 
No. 2, which tariff sheets are included in Appendix A attached to the 
filing. The proposed effective date of such tariff sheets is November 
1, 1998.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to 
terminate Section 7(c) firm transportation service under Rate Schedules 
X-289 and X-302 and to convert such services to service provided under 
Rate Schedule FT effective November 1, 1998. Upon conversion of SEP 
service under Rate Schedules X-289 and X-302, all SEP services will 
have been converted from Section 7(c) service to Part 284 Service.
    The charges applicable to SEP firm transportation service which has 
been converted from individually certificated Section 7(c) firm 
transportation service to annual firm transportation service under 
Transco's blanket certificate and Part 284 of the Commission's 
regulations are set forth on Sheet No. 40F of Transco's Volume No. 1 
Tariff.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to the 
converting SEP shippers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18506 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCES TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,198
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                       (224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (336)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order entered March 22, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 11

- 01708

- CV

HAL RACHAL, JR., Appellant

V.

LETKIEWICZ & FOSTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR

- 09

- 2413

- 2



### O RDER

We GRANT appellee’s March 15, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

Appellee shall file its brief on or before April 1, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Trimcos, LLC v. Compass Bank

Appellate case number: 01-19-01000-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-42334

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Trimcos LLC,, has filed a motion for rehearing. The Court requests a response 

to the motion for rehearing from appellee, Compass Bank. The response must be filed no later 

than 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Julie Countiss______

Acting individually

Date: January 27, 2022
**DoDAAD Process Review Committee (PRC) AGENDA**

**November 1, 2018**

**0900 Start**

**Location: LMI Tyson’s, VA**

**As of: October 26, 2018,  12:35 PM**

**DEFENSE COLLABORATION SERVICE (DCS)**

Defense Collaboration Service (DCS) will be used to provide real-time viewing on your computer screen of the presentations for those participants who are dialing into the meeting.  Access to DCS is through your web browser, and no special software is required.  

**AGENDA ITEMS****

***NOTE:  All ADCs and PDCs can be found on the Enterprise Business Standards Office******website******.***

1. **Welcome, Admin, & Introductions - 0900**

2. **OUSD, Defense Pricing and Contracting - 0915**

3. **GSA Office of Supply Chain Management - 1020**

4. **Enterprise DoDAAD Website (ADCs 1197/1257) - 1050**

5. **Lunch - 1200**

6. **Rules for Contractor DoDAACs (PDC 1300) & DoDAAC Purpose Flags from PIEE (PDC 1311) - 1300**

7. **The RIC Project 1315**

8. **DoDAAD Syndication (PDC 1145) - 1420**

9. **DoDAAD Realignment (PDC 1248) - 1440**

10. **CTR Flag Implementation (ADC 1191) - 1500**

11. **Wrap Up - 1515**

1
No. 11-5060.

#### Martin Avila, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 264,

181 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5293.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 958.
#### *State, Petitioner, v. Porter, Respondent,*

No. 92174-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71801-1-I, July 6, 2015, 2015,188 188 Wn. App. 735. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
No. 10-5514.

#### Nicie Dillehay, aka Nicie Anne Smith, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 984,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 57.

178 L. Ed. 2d 813,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 926, 131 S. Ct. 312, 178 L. Ed. 2d 203, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7525.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

a0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156047 & (22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156047

COA: 336318

Oakland CC: 2011

- 238085

- FH

JAY LEE HOLMES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement an issue is GRANTED . The

application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

W ILDER , J., did not parti cipate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
No. 10-10808.

#### Ronald D. Veteto, Petitioner v. Richard F. Allen, et al.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 175,

181 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5942.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 106 So. 3d 925.
B-MP0123E (1/23) ©2023 Magellan Health, Inc.

Mindfulness: Finding your purpose 

and vision in a changing world

With countless modern distractions, it can be hard to be present in 

the moment, focus on your purpose in life and feel gratitude for 

the good that’s happening. 

Register for this live webinar* on Wednesday, January 11 at 1:00 pm CT to:

• Define mindfulness

• Identify your unique gifts, talents and interests

• Discuss techniques to maintain your life purpose

*All live webinars are recorded and posted on your member website.

Call your Employee Assistance Program at

1-866-580-9046 (TTY 711) or visit

MagellanAscend.com for helpful resources.
No. 11-5187.

#### Melecio M. Cardona, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 279,

181 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5433.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Exhibit 10.2


Kinergy Marketing LLC
(“Kinergy”) 2014 Short-Term Incentive Plan (“Plan”) Description


		·	Effective Date: The Plan was adopted by the compensation committee (the “Compensation Committee”)
of the board of directors of Pacific Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on June 13, 2014.



		·	Participant: the Company’s Vice President of Ethanol Supply and Trading.



		·	Aggregate Plan Pool: The dollar amount of the aggregate Plan pool will be established by the Compensation
Committee.



		·	Awards: Awards under the Plan will be recommended by the Company’s executive committee, subject
to approval by the Compensation Committee.



		·	Award Components: Awards under the Plan will be based on three elements: Kinergy financial performance,
overall Company financial performance and individual performance, each of which will be assigned a weighting. The awards based
on each of the three elements will be capped so that the aggregate award conforms to the Plan pool established by the Compensation
Committee.



 





	 	 o	
The Kinergy financial performance element will be based on an adjusted net income goal established by the Compensation
Committee. The financial performance element is non-discretionary and funded on a sliding scale percentage of Kinergy’s adjusted
net income, subject to a cap.
	 	 	 
	 	 o	
The overall Company financial performance element will be based on an earnings before interest, taxes, debt extinguishments,
fair value adjustments, warrant inducements and depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) goal established
by the Compensation Committee. The overall Company financial performance element is non-discretionary and will be funded at a rate
of 0% to 175% of a targeted payout amount based on the level of actual Adjusted EBITDA compared to the Adjusted EBITDA goal, subject
to a cap.
	 	 	 
	 	 o	The individual performance element will
be based on quantitative criteria and subjective elements established by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in consultation
with the Company’s executive committee and the participant. The extent to which the participant will be deemed to have achieved
his individual performance goals will be determined by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, subject to approval by the
Compensation Committee. The individual performance element is discretionary and will be funded at a rate of 0% to 100% of a targeted
payout amount, subject to a cap.
No. 11-110.

#### Michael Paul Udofot, Petitioner v. Seven Eights Liquor.

565 U.S. 882, 132 S. Ct. 252,

181 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5596.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17974]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[049-1049b; FRL-6118-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of 
Missouri

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve revised Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-
6.030 as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). This 
revision, submitted by the state on December 17, 1996, incorporates 
into the rule the most current EPA guidance on capture efficiency 
methods for volatile organic compound emission control systems.
    In the final rules section of the Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision 
amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no 
relevant adverse comments are received in response to the direct final 
rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to that rule. If 
the EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will 
be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on the direct final rule. Any parties 
interested in commenting on the rule should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by August 7, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Kim Johnson, Environmental 
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 726 Minnesota 
Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Johnson at (913) 551-7975.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final rule which is located in the rules section of the Federal 
Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 26, 1998.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VII.
[FR Doc. 98-17974 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
No. 10-10891.

#### Sebra R. Rollins, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 855, 132 S. Ct. 186,

181 L. Ed. 2d 95,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6381.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Colin O’Kroley, * From the 244th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C

- 130,005

- A.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00114

- CV * June 26, 2014

Byron Brown, Ray Pringle, Pringle * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Management Company, Jennie Holder, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
and Byron Brown Realty Corporation, Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal

ar e taxed against Colin O’Kroley.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.49 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.49 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.49 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.49 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil