alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-1514.

#### Wilson J. Campbell, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 116,

181 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5346.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.

Same case below, 205 N.J. 2, 10 A.3d 1201.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18312]



[[Page 37410]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UT-912-08-0777-52]


Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Utah's Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet August 17-18, 
1998. The RAC will be touring the Fivemile Pass Area looking at the 
various recreation impacts and opportunities (i.e. housing development, 
rifle range proposal, tailings, active mining, OHV play areas, private 
land, grazing, and standards and guides for rangeland health).
    A public comment period has been scheduled from 4:30-5:00 p.m. in 
the conference room of the Comfort Inn, 491 South Main Street, Tooele, 
Utah. Anyone interested in addressing the Council and/or attending the 
meeting should contact Sherry Foot, Special Programs Coordinator, 
Bureau of Land Management, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, 
Utah, 84111; telephone (801) 539-4195.
    On August 18, the Council will travel to the Knolls Recreation Area 
where they will be looking at a different type of site in terms of 
vegetation and soils. The RAC will then tour the Salt Flats looking at 
the first year of the salt lay-down project and discussing filming use 
in the area.
    Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public; however, 
transportation, meals, and overnight accommodations are the 
responsibility of the participating public.

    Dated: July 1, 1998.
Linda S. Colville,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 98-18312 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
Siloxanes ECA Meeting Agenda

Thursday December 6, 2012

1:30-3:30 PM EST 

Location: Room 4225, EPA East, 

1201 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460

Teleconference: (866) 299-3188; code: (202) 564-4760

Agenda:

I. Introductions

II. EPA’s Objectives for Siloxane Monitoring – Clarifying Discussion

III. Estimated Costs of Monitoring 

IV. EPA Plans for D4 Risk Assessment

V. SEHSC Perspectives on D4 Risk Assessment

VI. Interested Party Input

VII. Adjourn

For further information, please contact Marcus Aguilar at (202) 564-3194 or 

aguilar.marcus@epa.gov
No. 10-10913.

#### Donald Bell, Petitioner v. Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones and Schneider, LLP.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 189,

181 L. Ed. 2d 97,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5874.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 10-10871.

#### Bernard Albert Nelson, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 183,

181 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6034.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 51 Cal. 4th 198, 120 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406, 246 P.3d 301.
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FU1/FU2/GU1/GU2 FORMAT**

**PROGRESS PAYMENT**

142

APPENDIX 3.26

1
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06363**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06363\06363_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06363\06363_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06363\06363_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06363\06363_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06363\06363_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06363\06363_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06363\06363_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06363\06363_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06363\Certification Statement_06363.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Aerial view.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Follow Up attachment.pdf Technical Review Correspondence x 

### 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_Follow up Responses.pdf Technical Review Correspondence x 

### x 06363\Supporting Documentation\06363_M73-LG01-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
July 13, 1998.
    A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, July 16, 1998, at 11:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) 
(4), (8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled 
matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Hunt, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 16, 1998, at 11:00 
a.m., will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions.
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: July 9, 1998.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18677 Filed 7-9-98; 10:57 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
No. 11-5627.

#### Emanuel Brown, Petitioner v. Robert Werlinger, Warden.

565 U.S. 807, 132 S. Ct. 387,

181 L. Ed. 2d 9,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6603.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 164.
No. 10-1396.

#### Ali Darvishian, Petitioner v. John McHugh, Secretary of the Army.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 103,

181 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6877.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 822.
No. 11-5026.

#### Ronnie Lee Bowling, Petitioner v. Philip W. Parker, Warden.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 260,

181 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5300.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
No. 10-11141.

#### Robert Earl James, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 869, 132 S. Ct. 220,

181 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7137.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 191 Cal. App. 4th 478, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Baron Aviation Services, Inc., * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1711504.

Vs. No. 11-22-00131-CV * November 2, 2023

Larry Kitchen, * Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we render judgment in favor of 

Appellant. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Larry 

Kitchen.
**1/24/00 DRAFT**

**DoD 4000.25-7-M**

#### *DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, April 11, 2012

**AP2.4. APPENDIX 2.4**

**BILLING STATUS**

**AP2.4-3**

78

	APPENDIX 2.4

AP2.4-3

	APPENDIX 2.4
CITY / SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX FORM

Any City/School District Tax questions should be forwarded via email to: 

PayRollCOE@dla.mil

To have city tax or school district tax automatically withheld from your salary, you 

must provide the following information to your payroll liaison at the email address 

above.

Name, social security number, organization code, work telephone number, and the 

city and/or local school district for which you wish deductions to be made.
No. 10-11120.

#### Antwan Lavern Graham, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 868, 132 S. Ct. 217,

181 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6720.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*119Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 158.
*DoD 4000.25-1-M, April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.12. APPENDIX 6.12**

**ABBREVIATED MILSTRIP MESSAGE SHIPMENT STATUS**

FROM:  {APPROPRIATE INDICATOR OF SENDER}

TO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE(S)}

SUBJECT:  ABBREVIATED MILSTRIP SHIPMENT STATUS

1. AS1/00040/FB5249/1165/0001/BLNK/036/02/FB524911650001XXX/B

2. AS1/00012/FB5294/1165/0003/A/C44/02/FB529411650003XXX/B

**SAMPLE**

**1**

APPENDIX 1.12

AP6.12-1

APPENDIX 6.12
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ ROBERT GREENBERGRobert GreenbergChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)November 6, 2009/s/ DAVID WEINBERGDavid WeinbergChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 6, 2009
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.5-1 APPENDIX 3.5

AP3.5. APPENDIX 3.5

INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT – INCREASE OR 

DECREASE (LOGISTICS TRANSFER/ 

CAPITALIZATION/DECAPITALIZATION)

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC D8E, D8F, D9E, or D9F, 

asappropriate.

Routing Identifier

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the inventory control point 

(ICP) to which this transaction is being 

forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item being 

adjusted.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity 25-29 Enter quantity of the increase or decrease, 

preceding significant digits with zeros. 1,2

Document Number 30-43 For DIC D8_ increase transactions, 

perpetuate document number from DIC DEE 

or DEF transactions. For DICD9_, decrease 

transactions, enter current document 

number of the losing ICP using a 

consecutive serial number for each different 

inventory control record balance.

Suffix 44 For DIC D8_ transactions, perpetuate code 

from DIC DEE or DEF transaction. For DIC

D9_transactions, enter consecutive alpha 

codes A through Z when assignment of 

suffix codes is necessary. 3

Routing Identifier 

(Losing)

45-47 Enter RIC of the losing ICP.

1 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.1.

2 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.2. 

3 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.3.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.5-2 APPENDIX 3.5

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Blank 48-53 Leave blank.

Distribution 54-56 Enter distribution code if inventory control 

records are maintained by codes reflected in 

the distribution field; otherwise, leave blank.

Project 57-59 Enter project code if inventory control 

records are maintained by codes reflected in 

the project field; otherwise, leave blank. 

Blank 60-61 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Effective) 

62-64 Enter original effective day (ordinal day of 

the calendar year) of the logistic transfer or 

decapitalization.

Ownership/Purpose 65 To be used by gaining ICP.

Supply Condition 66 To be used by gaining ICP.

Routing Identifier 

Code (Storage 

Activity)

67-69 Enter RIC of storage activity at which item is 

stored.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Enter ownership/purpose code of the 

inventory balance being affected.

Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code of the inventory 

balance being affected.

Management 72 Enter management code; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which transaction is prepared.

Blank 76-80 Leave blank.
rs

~ National Infant

®} Immunization Week
ies
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,243,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               50,613,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,642,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 78,672,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           148,426,000
<PP&E>                                     488,369,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             178,122,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             493,818,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      113,946,000
<BONDS>                                    404,151,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (89,593,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               493,818,000
<SALES>                                    385,653,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           385,653,000
<CGS>                                      293,154,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              293,154,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,239,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          44,557,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (34,816,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,058,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (31,758,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (31,758,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00419-CR

William Horace WALKER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1349

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED August 19, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### *State, Respondent, v. Campbell, Petitioner,*

No. 91873-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45488-2-II, June 4, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1003. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 10-7825.

#### Luis Alfredo Delgado, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 970,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 192.

178 L. Ed. 2d 797,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 467.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6186

SOLOMON SMITH, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-218-2)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Solomon Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Ann Bullock Walker,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We note that the claims that Appellant attempted to add in his

response in opposition to Appellee's motion to dismiss, his objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and his

informal brief were not presented to the state court. Accordingly

the claims were not exhausted, and dismissal was proper on that

ground. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). As to Appellant's sufficiency of

the evidence claim, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smith v. Angelone, No. CA-96-218-2 (E.D. Va., Jan. 15,

1997).

Because the appeal presents no substantial or complex issues,

we deny Appellant's motion to authorize preparation of a transcript

at government expense and his motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
*June 2001 DRAFT*

DoD 4000.25-2-M

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.64. APPENDIX 3.64**

**LOCATION RECONCILIATION HISTORY NOTIFICATION**

## 

**AP3.1-**

AP3.64-1

APPENDIX 3.64
# BLANK EST

# BLANK

# image1.emf
No. 11-5028.

#### Michael W. Belcher, Petitioner v. David Sexton, Warden.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 260,

181 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5675.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-59.

#### Isaac A. Isaiah, Petitioner v. Western Maryland Hospital System, et al.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 247,

181 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5336.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 301.
# C_2014315EN.01003202.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/32

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla — Hungary) — Criminal proceedings against István Balázs, Dániel Papp

(Case C-45/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fundamental rights - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 47, 50 and 54 - Implementation of EU law - Lack - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 315/52

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Ítélőtábla

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

István Balázs, Dániel Papp

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) by order of 21 January 2014.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 32(b)



                                 TXU GAS COMPANY
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF PFO


         The undersigned, Scott Longhurst, Principal Financial Officer of TXU
Gas Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
         31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 17th day of March, 2004.




                                        /s/ Scott Longhurst
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Name:    Scott Longhurst
                                   Title:   Principal Financial Officer








 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
 provided to TXU Gas Company and will be retained by TXU Gas Company and
 furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
 request.
No. 11-5556.

#### Harold Stafford, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 328,

181 L. Ed. 2d 204,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6157.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 270.
**DoD Supply Discrepancy Reporting (SDR) Committee (US)**

**Meeting 03-2, November 19-20, 2003**

**HQC Conference Room 2905**

**Agenda**
No. 10-10844.

#### Thomas Gribovszki, Petitioner v. Stanford University.

565 U.S. 852, 132 S. Ct. 179,

181 L. Ed. 2d 89,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6332.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.