alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
          THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE RELATED
          CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
          DECEMBER 31, 1995 OF THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND
          IS QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          4,551
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   9,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    13,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  491
<PP&E>                                         33,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 63,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,517
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           77
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   63,780
<SALES>                                        91,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               91,585
<CGS>                                          70,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  78,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    8,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.04
        


</TABLE>
No. 10-10945.

#### Timothy Hanson, Petitioner v. John C. Thomas, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Chester, et al.

565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 193,

181 L. Ed. 2d 100,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6020.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 50.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ALDO ALVAREZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-10265 

D.C. No. 4:19-cr-00271-HSG-3

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Aldo Alvarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 

guilty-plea conviction and 12-month-and-1-day sentence for possession with intent 

to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-10265 

Alvarez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along 

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarez the 

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or 

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL

Pro se - TDC# 1334295

W.C. McConnell Unit

3001 S. Emily Dr.

Beeville, Texas 78102

December 4, 2015

COURT OF APPEALS, FIRST DISTRICT

c/o Clerk of Court

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002

RE: Case No: 01-15-00731-CV

T.C. Case No. 2014-63129

Status of Mandamus

FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

DEC 10 2015

CLER

Dear Clerk of Court:

I received notice from this court that the court filed my

petition for writ of mandamus on August 31, 2015. However, I

have not received anything regarding the statue. Please inform

me in writing of the status of my petition because the trial

court has set the case for trial on May 2, 2016. I need this

issue resolved prior to trial.

Thank you for your immediate assistance.

Sincerely,

Artis Charles Harrell
•si oowtMQ

cp

en

U)

a

tn

rt

rjo

03 OJ

fDO

rDO

< «-«

•&.H>

ao ntn

3^~

o too

o ojJ

o^ o>

(T Ul (D

fl>- PI 3 t-3 hro »-* X K

0)

[ftOH

-J•

CO

h-1 o

C3

33

$S :H
##### 



Exhibit 10.2

THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY

600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037

October 25, 2001

The Corporate Executive Board Company
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006

|Attention: |  | James J. McGonigle,                 
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------
|           |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

|    |  |                                                                                                                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Non-Competition Agreement by and among The Corporate Executive
Board Company,
The Advisory Board Company and David G. Bradley

Dear James:

Effective as of January 1, 1999, The
Advisory Board Company ("ABC"), entered into a Non-Competition Agreement (the "Agreement") with The
Corporate Executive Board Company (CEB), and David G. Bradley (Bradley).
Section 5 of the Agreement provides that the term of the Agreement shall end on the date that is five
years after January 1, 1999.

This letter confirms that, in
consideration of the benefits which each of CEB and ABC draw from the Agreement, CEB and ABC have agreed
to amend Section 5 of the Agreement to provide that the term of the Agreement, solely with respect to
the rights and obligations as between CEB and ABC, shall end on January 1, 2007. Nothing in this letter
shall be deemed to amend, waive, void or extend the term of the Agreement with respect to Bradleys rights
or obligations under the Agreement.

Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning one copy of
this letter, which will constitute our agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof.

|                           |  |                      
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Very truly yours,         
|                          
|THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY
|                          
|By:                        |  | /s/ JEFFREY D. ZIENTS
|                          
|Name:                      |  | Jeffrey D. Zients    
|Title:                     |  | Chairman             

|                                                           |  |                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY
|                                                          
|By:                                                        |  | /s/ JAMES J. MCGONIGLE              
|                                                          
|Name:                                                      |  | Jeffrey D. Zients                   
|Title:                                                     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
### Calendar Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 billion gallons Baseline - EPA Proposed Rule (May 2015) Overall RFS 15.93016.30017.400 17.501 17.611 Conventional Gap (Implied Ethanol) 13.25013.40014.000 14.00014.000 Advanced 2.680 2.900 3.400 3.501 3.611 Biodiesel 1.630 1.700 1.800 1.900 1.900 Cellulosic 0.033 0.106 0.206 0.256 0.306 Advanced Gap 0.120 0.159 0.404 0.300 0.360 California CARB (sugarcane ethanol) 0.120 0.180 0.240 0.300 0.360
NBB: Minimum Biodiesel Volume Obligations Overall RFS 15.93016.30018.000 18.00018.000 Conventional Gap (Implied Ethanol) 13.25013.40014.000 14.00014.000 Advanced 2.680 2.900 4.000 4.000 4.000 Biodiesel 1.630 1.700 2.000 2.300 2.300 Cellulosic 0.033 0.106 0.206 0.256 0.306 Advanced Gap 0.120 0.159 0.694 0.179 0.129 California CARB (sugarcane ethanol) 0.120 0.180 0.240 0.300 0.360



## Feedstocks Summary, Minimum Scenario Levels and Change from Proposed Rule (Baseline)
Marketing Year (Oct/Sep) 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 change from baseline Feedstocks Used for Biodiesel Production (methyl ester) Soybean Oil Million Pounds5,303 6,057 6,150 6,489 Corn Oil Million Pounds1,409 2,021 2,174 2,267 Canola Oil Million Pounds1,100 910 772 715 Inedible Tallow Million Pounds374 430 468 495 White Grease Million Pounds471 479 476 469 Yellow Grease Million Pounds1,127 1,158 1,154 1,131 Brown Grease Million Pounds156 155 156 158 Poultry Fat Million Pounds147 188 194 186 Other Fats and Used Vegetable Oils Million Pounds847 847 847 847 Total Million Pounds10,93412,246 12,392 12,757

Feedstock Share Soybean Oil Percent 48.5% 49.5% 49.6% 50.9% Corn Oil Percent 12.9% 16.5% 17.5% 17.8% Canola Oil Percent 10.1% 7.4% 6.2% 5.6% Inedible Tallow Percent 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% White Grease Percent 4.3% 3.9% 3.8% 3.7% Yellow Grease Percent 10.3% 9.5% 9.3% 8.9% Brown Grease Percent 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 

## RFS Volume Obligation AssumptionsPoultry Fat Percent 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% 1.5%

Other Percent 7.8% 6.9% 6.8% 6.6% Total Percent 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%

Feedstock Prices Soybean Oil Cents Per Pound29.32 29.55 29.86 30.05 Corn Oil Cents Per Pound21.69 19.34 18.84 18.67 Canola Oil Cents Per Pound35.35 37.73 39.55 40.82 Inedible Tallow Cents Per Pound26.01 24.21 23.55 23.32 White Grease Cents Per Pound24.43 22.78 23.91 25.79 Yellow Grease Cents Per Pound22.00 20.91 21.47 22.74 Brown Grease Cents Per Pound12.74 12.89 13.11 13.31 Poultry Fat Cents Per Pound23.30 21.83 22.43 23.98 Other Cents Per Pound23.94 22.43 22.84 23.96

## Feedstocks Summary, Minimum Scenario Levels and Change from Proposed Rule (Baseline)

15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19

change from baseline

642 818 791 763 318 403 404 294 134 185 154 146 26 35 34 31 2 4 5 5 49 72 57 39 9 12 13 12 15 22 16 10 0 0 0 0 1,194 1,552 1,474 1,298

0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.9% 1.7% 1.4% 1.3% 0.6% 0.2% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% -0.2% -0.2% -0.2% -0.1% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.4% -0.8% -0.7% -0.7% -0.6% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1%-0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

-0.9% -1.0% -1.0% -0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

2.21 2.72 2.92 2.67 1.09 1.36 1.42 1.57 1.81 1.83 2.07 1.69 1.43 2.02 2.16 2.05 1.77 2.25 2.23 2.08 0.77 0.95 1.52 1.82 0.46 0.64 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.56 1.35 1.85 1.13 1.44 1.82 1.95
4. Except as amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full forceand effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the date first abovewritten.   **“LANDLORD”** **“TENANT”**   **HF LOGISTICS I, LLC, a Delaware** **SKECHERS U.S.A., INC., a Delaware****limited liability company** **corporation**   **By /s/ Iddo Benzeevi**       **IddoBenzeevi, President and** **By /s/ Philip G. Paccione**       **PhilipG. Paccione, Corporate**     **Chief Executive Officer**      **Secretary and Executive Vice**       **President, Business Affairs**
2
Exhibit 32.2
Form 10-QSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Viking  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
Blomquist,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 8, 2004



/s/ Dennis Blomquist
Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2970 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington National Cemetery 

a monument honoring Army Security Agency veterans of World War 

II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington 

National Cemetery a monument honoring Army Security 

Agency veterans of World War II, the Korean conflict, 

and the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Army Security Agency 

5 Monument Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2970 IH

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF MONUMENT HONORING VETERANS 

2 OF THE ARMY SECURITY AGENCY WHO 

3 SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES BETWEEN 

4 1945 AND 1976, DURING WORLD WAR II, THE 

5 KOREAN CONFLICT, AND THE VIETNAM ERA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of 

7 subsection (c), the Secretary of the Army shall place in 

8 Arlington National Cemetery a monument honoring Army 

9 Security Agency veterans who served in the Armed Forces 

10 between 1945 and 1976, during World War II, the Korean 

11 conflict, and the Vietnam era. 

12 (b) DESIGN.—The monument placed under sub13 section (a) shall be based on a design approved by the 

14 Secretary of the Army and the National Army Security 

15 Agency Association. 

16 (c) AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTE17 NANCE.—The Secretary of the Army may only place a 

18 monument under subsection (a) if the Secretary enters 

19 into an agreement with the National Army Security Agen20 cy Association under which the Association agrees to pay 

21 all costs necessary for preparation of the site for the 

22 monument and to construct, install, and maintain the 

23 monument, and to such other provisions as the Secretary 

24 may require. 

25 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘World 

26 War II’’, ‘‘Korean conflict’’, and ‘‘Vietnam era’’ have the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2970 IH

1 meanings given such terms in section 101 of title 38, 

2 United States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Reference Key Air LLC ExemptionIRulcmaking FAA-20l1-033? 

Danny Olmstead 

to: 

Chris Monteleon 

06/22/2011 02:50 PM 

Cc: 

Knul Finnevolden 

Show Details 

History: This message has been repli ed to. 

Chris, 

6/29/2011 10:22:53 AM 

Key Air would like to amend FAA Docket ID FAA-2011-0337 to include an exemption from FAR 135.225 (f) (2), lower than 

standard landing minimums. 

Key Air proposes to conduct IFR approaches at military and foreign airports when visibility is less than one half mile. Key Air is 

authorized to use lower than standard approach minima at U.S. Civil Airports in accordance with the limitations and provisions 

of Operations Specification paragraph COS2. Further, this proposal requests identical privileges at military and foreign airports 

as those described in the provisions of our current Operations Specification paragraph (052. 

Key Air will comply with the applicable instrument approach procedures and weather minimums prescribed by the authority 

having jurisdiction over foreign and military airports. This petition applies to all aircraft Key Air has listed on the certificates 0085 

Aircraft Listing Operational Specification. 

In support of this proposal, Key Air respectfully submits the following comments: 

1. All Key Air crewmembers are trained and evaluated in FAA-approved level C and 0 simulators under an FAAapproved 14 (FR Part 135 training program. The lower than Standard Approach Minimums training event is 

included in all Initial, Upgrade and Recurrent Curriculum Segments. The simulator training and evaluation is done 

using low visibility conditions appropriate to the minimums authorized in the Ops Specs C052 (c) (I). Key Air 

training meets all the regulatory requirements and follows the applicable 8900.1 guidance for both FAR part 121 

and 135 training programs. 

2. Key Air is currently authorized to conduct instrument approaches at U.S. Civil Airports in weather below ~ mile 

visibility minimums for 14 CFR 135 aircraft operations through Operations Specification (052 Paragraph (c) (1). 

Therefore, the FAA has already recognized that Key Air can safely and effectively conduct said operations. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the number listed below. 

Danny Olmstead 

Vice President of Flight Operations 

Waterbury-Orlord Airport 

3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201 

Oxford, CT 06478 

(S8S) KEY·AIR·! toll free 

(203) 264·0605 phone 

(203) 575·4420 direct 

(203)264-3029 fax 

www.KeyAir.com 

Page 1 of2 
'.$ ~ I R @ Key A;" Celebrat;ng 25 Ye"s of SeIV;ce 

CONFIDENTIALITY NonCE 

6/29/2011 10:22:53 AM 

This electronic mail tr~r'lsmissjor'l is confiderlti~l. may be privileged and should be read or retained only by the intended recipient. If you have received thi~ tran smi~sion In error, 

ple~~e immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system. 

Page 2 of2
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, Timothy R. Yost, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Corporate Executive Board Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2004
/s/ Timothy R. Yost
No. 10-11016.

#### Elijah Cummings, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 203,

181 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6170.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 16 N.Y.3d 784, 919 N.Y.S.2d 500, 944 N.E.2d 1139.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 285 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 285

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    exclusion from gross income of discharge of qualified principal 
                        residence indebtedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    exclusion from gross income of discharge of qualified principal 
                        residence indebtedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mortgage Debt Tax Forgiveness Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE 
              OF QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(a)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``which is discharged'' and all that 
follows and inserting a period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to indebtedness discharged after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```