alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2004
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Electric City Corp. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ John P. MitolaJohn P. MitolaChief Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2005
 - 35 -
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                       Ethyl Corporation and Subsidiaries
               Computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
              for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
                     (In thousands except per share amounts)

                                                  2001       2000       1999
                                                 -------    -------    -------

Net (loss)income applicable to common stock (1) $(105,040)  $60,997    $55,297
                                                 =========  =======    =======
Average number of shares of common stock
outstanding (2,3)                                  83,455    83,462     83,465
                                                 =========  =======    =======

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share     $   (1.26)  $  0.73    $  0.66
                                                 =========  =======    =======
Notes:

(1)   In the periods presented, the Company had only one class of common stock
      outstanding.

(2)   To determine the average number of shares of common stock and common stock
      equivalents, the average number of common shares and common stock
      equivalents outstanding (actual or assumed for equivalents) during each
      month were added together and the sum was then divided by 12.

(3)    For diluted earnings per share, the shares issuable upon the assumed
       exercise of outstanding stock options would be 0 for each period.
No. 10-10702.

#### Andre Keith Dodds, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 161,

181 L. Ed. 2d 75,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5878.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-229.

#### David Brown, Petitioner v. Hawaii, et al.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 256,

181 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5563.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 642.
*DLM 4000.25-4, May 04, 2018*

**DEFENSE AUTOMATIC ADDRESSING SYSTEM (DAAS)**

**PROCESS CHANGE HISTORY**

******CHP-3	PROCESS CHANGE HISTORY
TOP SECRET RECEIPT AND ACCESS RECORD

ADDRESSEE (Complete Address) RETURN THIS RECEIPT IMMEDIATELY TO (Complete

Address)

DESCRIPTION (List document originator, type, abbreviated classification, unclassified subject or title, number of copies and copy numbers if

any, attachments followed by abbreviated classification, other identifying data. Changes in the description (additions, withdrawals, etc.) will

be shown with the date and initials of individual making entry.)

DESTRUCTION CERTIFICATE: All material described above has been destroyed in accordance with prescribing directive.

SIGNATURE AND GRADE OF DESTRUCTION OFFICIAL SIGNATURE AND GRADE OF WITNESSING OFFICIAL DATE DESTROYED

DLA FORM 138, NOV 86 (EG) EDITION OF DEC 75 MAY BE USED UNTIL EXHAUSTED. PDF (DLA)

CONTROL NUMBER

DATE RECEIVED

DATE DISPATCHED

ACCESS RECORD

NAMES OF ALL INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE RECEIVED ACCESS TO INFORMATION CONTAINED IN ATTACHED DOCUMENT

NAME DATE NAME DATE

DOCUMENT RECEIPT

NAMES OF INITIAL AND SUBSEQUENT CUSTODIANS OF DOCUMENT. NEW SIGNATURE REQUIRED WHEN CUSTODY OF DOCUMENT CHANGES.

TYPED OR PRINTED NAME & GRADE OF INDIVIDUAL

SIGNING FOR THE DOCUMENT SIGNATURE DATE
No. 09-11480.

#### Roger J. Day, Petitioner v. Minnesota, et al.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 818,

178 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9774.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 272.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34677-34678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before August 24, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst,

[[Page 34678]]

Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 5000, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 202-205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: ``Application Form for SDB Program''.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Form No: 2065.
    Description of Respondents: Small Businesses applying for SDB 
Certification.
    Annual Responses: 30,000.
    Annual Burden: 90,000.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Brenda Washington, General Business & Industry Specialist, Office of 
Minority Enterprise Development, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street S.W., Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20416, Phone No: 202-205-
7663.
    Send comments regarding whether this information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, 
accuracy of burden estimate, in addition to ways to minimize this 
estimate, and ways to enhance the quality.
    Title: ``Application for Business Loans''.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Form No.'s: 4,4SCH A, 4-I, 4-L, 4-SHORT, EIB-SBA-84-1.
    Description of Respondents: Applicants for an SBA Business Loan.
    Annual Responses: 60,000.
    Annual Burden: 1,187,400.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Keith Lucas, Program Support Specialist, Office of Financial 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street S.W., Suite 
8300, Washington, D.C. 20416 . Phone No: 202-205-6486. Send comments 
regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the 
proper performance of the function of the agency, accuracy of burden 
estimate, in addition to ways to minimize this estimate, and ways to 
enhance the quality.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-16838 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 11-5004.

#### Kevyn K. Taylor, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 257,

181 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5767.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 637 F.3d 812.
No. 10-10872.

#### Carol A. Murphy, Petitioner v. Maine (two judgments).

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 183,

181 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5908.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.

Same case below, 10 A.3d 697 (second judgment).
----

 Exhibit 32.2 

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002, fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results  of operations. 

October 10, 2003

/s/ Michael Harrop                                      Michael Harrop, Chief Financial Officer 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3213 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 

certain retirement plan contributions picked up by governmental employers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. 

FLEISCHMANN, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, Mr. 

KUSTOFF of Tennessee, and Mr. JOHN W. ROSE of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the treatment of certain retirement plan contributions 

picked up by governmental employers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

4 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS PICKED 

5 UP BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3213 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘For purposes of paragraph 

2 (1)’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para4 graph (1)’’, and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF ELECTIONS BE8 TWEEN ALTERNATIVE BENEFIT FORMULAS.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

10 subparagraph (A), a contribution shall not 

11 fail to be treated as picked up by an em12 ploying unit merely because the employee 

13 may make an irrevocable election between 

14 the application of two alternative benefit 

15 formulas involving the same or different 

16 levels of employee contributions. 

17 ‘‘(ii) APPLICATION TO EXISTING EM18 PLOYEES.—Clause (i) shall be applied 

19 without regard to whether the employee is 

20 already covered by one of the benefit for21 mulas referred to therein.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply to years ending after the date of 

24 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-5363.

#### Gregory Wines, Petitioner v. Michigan.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 302,

181 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5607.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51401

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE JUAREZ-OROZCO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CR-305-ALL-OG

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Jose Juarez-Orozco appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Juarez

contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define

separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate

offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in

his indictment. Juarez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an
No. 02-51401

-2-

indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year

maximum term of imprisonment and one-year maximum term of

supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Juarez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday, May 16, 1998, in Toppenish, Washington, at the Yakama 
Indian Nation Cultural Center (Highway 97 and Buster Road) in the 14 
Tribes Room. The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. and continue until 5 
p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to provide information on (1) Water 
Quality Issues, (2) Tribal Hunting and Wildlife Concerns, (3) 
Huckleberry and other Special Forest Product concerns, (4) Timber 
Management by the Yakama Nation during the listing of the Spotted Owl, 
and (5) Public Open Forum. All Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are 
encouraged to attend. The ``open forum'' provides opportunity for the 
public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory 
Committee. The ``open forum'' is scheduled as part of agenda item (5) 
for this meeting. Interested speakers will need to register prior to 
the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written 
comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Linda Turner, Public Affairs 
Specialist, at (360) 891-5195, or write Forest Headquarters Office, 
Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 
98682.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Larry I. Seekins,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-18311 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Order filed April 17, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00046-CR

____________

ERIC DEMOND DOUGLAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1122749

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed February 6, 2014. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain a bill of costs.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before May 15, 2014, containing a bill of costs.

PER CURIAM
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00216-CR

Ezekiel Gabriel Wiggins

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (51,027-C)

April 30, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
101

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Minnesota

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $52.9 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 5,900

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 102,100

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $2,519 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $375.6 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $166.9 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $542.5 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 10%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$13.5 $16.8 $2.51 $3.12

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$5.2 $7.5 $0.97 $1.39

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $13.6 $21.7 $2.53 $4.03

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$3.2 $4.6 $0.60 $0.85

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$1.6 $2.3 $0.30 $0.43

TOTAL $37.1 $52.9 $6.91 $9.82

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-3: OTS Nos. 03257 and H-2193]


Harbor Financial, M.H.C., Fort Pierce, Florida; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 16, 1998, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Harbor Financial, M.H.C., Fort Pierce, Florida, to convert to the stock 
form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20552, and the Southeast Regional 
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 Peachtree Street, N.E., 
Atlanta, GA 30309.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1894 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
# DLA Aviation holds Resiliency Training: expands employees' skills in dealing with life pressures

/ Published Dec. 23, 2015
RICHMOND, Virginia,
No. 11-5072.

#### Anthony Norris Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 265,

181 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5247.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 1043.
# Tb_RecOffer
No. 11-5579.

#### Tatyana A. Babakaeva, Petitioner v. Wilson & Wilson, P.C.

565 U.S. 915, 132 S. Ct. 330,

181 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6125.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
% Worker exposure 2 weeks, 5 days/week exposure, 30 days no exposure
% From Occup_Soil Inc for PBPK.xlsx, Mixer/Loader Dry Rochelle rate, Cole Crops
% January 19, 2016
% Cecilia Tan


% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
QPC = 62.38; 	% to get QALV = 16.7 L/min @BW = 69 kg
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;		%Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=69;	%Set BW to 69 kg
PREG=0;		%Not pregnant
DZONE = 1;	%Turn dermal exposure on
KDIS = 0.0;	%Daily dissipation
TSTOP=1392;	%Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure
SAF=1;	 	% Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.
FAD=1;     	% Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated. 
DERM =11.4;		% dose in ug/kg
D3=5;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2=8; %HRS/DAY
S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
%W2=28; %28 day exposure
W2=14; %14 day exposure

% Inhalation exposure
CONCMGM=0.0024; % Inhalation concentration mg/m3. Value is largest value reported in monitoring data.
D3IN=5;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2IN=8; %HRS/DAY
S2IN=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
%W2IN=28; %28 day exposure
W2IN=14; %14 day exposure

prepare @clear@all
start @NoCallback
simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];	%conc unit = ug/L

%save simall @file='mixer_dry_cole_rochelle_01192016' @format=ascii
save simall @file='mixer_dry_cole_rochelle_01212016' @format=ascii