21178 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, which 

satisfies certain infrastructure 

requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the 

CAA for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS for the 

State of Maryland, does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIP is not approved 

to apply in Indian country located in the 

state, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 4, 2014. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08490 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0672; FRL–9909–42– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing action to 

approve a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by 

the State of Missouri for the purpose of 

incorporating administrative changes to 

the Missouri rule entitled, ‘‘Municipal 

Solid Waste Landfills’’. EPA is 

proposing to approve this SIP revision 

based on EPA’s finding that the rule is 

as stringent as the rule it replaces and 

fulfills the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA or Act) for the protection of 

the ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) in St. Louis. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

May 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0672, by mail to Craig 

Bernstein, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Comments may 

also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Craig Bernstein, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; at 

913–551–7688; or by email at 

Bernstein.craig@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

action and anticipates no relevant 

adverse comments because the revisions 

are administrative and consistent with 

Federal regulations. A detailed rationale 

for the approval is set forth in the direct 

final rule. If no relevant adverse 

comments are received in response to 

this action, no further activity is 

contemplated in relation to this action. 

If EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed action. EPA will not institute 

a second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on part of this rule and if that 

part can be severed from the remainder 

of the rule, EPA may adopt as final 

those parts of the rule that are not the 

subject of an adverse comment. For 

additional information, see the direct 

final rule which is located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: April 3, 2014. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08339 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0145; FRL–9909–52– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Louisiana; Clean Data Determination 

for the Baton Rouge Area for the 2008 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to find that 

the Baton Rouge, Louisiana marginal 

2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment area 

is currently attaining the 2008 8-hour 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS) for ozone. This proposed 

clean data determination is based upon 

complete, quality assured, certified 

ambient air monitoring data that show 

the area has monitored attainment of the 

2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS during the 

2011–2013 monitoring period, and 

continues to monitor attainment of the 

NAAQS based on preliminary 2014 

data. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before May 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning 

Section (6PD–L), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Ellen Belk, Air Planning Section (6PD– 

L); telephone (214) 665–2164; email 

address: belk.ellen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Proposed Rules 21179 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: April 1, 2014. 

Samuel Coleman, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08373 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0715, FRL–9909–54– 

Region–10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Idaho: 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter 

and 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: On March 26, 2014, the EPA 

published a proposed rule finding that 

the Idaho State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) meets the infrastructure 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

for the National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for 

fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on July 

18, 1997 and October 17, 2006, and for 

ozone on March 12, 2008, in addition to 

the interstate transport requirements of 

the CAA related to prevention of 

significant deterioration and visibility 

for the 2006 PM2.5 and 2008 ozone 

NAAQS. In that publication, we 

supplied an incorrect docket number for 

commenters to use when they send us 

comments. The correct docket number 

is EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0715. If 

commenters have already submitted 

comments, they need not resubmit 

them, because they will be routed to the 

correct docket. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 25, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

OAR–2011–0715, by any of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: R10-Public_Comments@

epa.gov. 

• Mail: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10, 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT– 

107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, 

Seattle WA, 98101. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: 

List of Subjects 

EPA Region 10 Mailroom, 9th floor, 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle 

WA, 98101. Attention: Kristin Hall, 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, AWT— 

107. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2011– 

0715. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Do not submit information that 

you consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption, and be free of any 

defects or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 

during normal business hours at the 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle 

WA, 98101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357, 

hall.kristin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

On March 26, 2014 (79 FR 16711), we, 

the EPA, published a proposed rule 

finding that the Idaho SIP meets the 

infrastructure requirements of the CAA 

for the 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, and 2008 

ozone NAAQS, in addition to the 

interstate transport requirements of the 

CAA related to prevention of significant 

deterioration and visibility for the 2006 

PM2.5 and 2008 ozone NAAQS. In that 

publication, we supplied an incorrect 

docket number for commenters to use 

when they submit comments. We are 

publishing this notice to clarify that the 

correct docket number is EPA–R10– 

OAR–2011–0715. However, if you 

already submitted a comment, you need 

not resubmit it, because it will be routed 

to the correct docket. For details on the 

proposed rule, please see our original 

Federal Register publication at 79 FR 

16711. 

Dated: March 28, 2014. 

Michelle Pirzadeh, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08499 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0890; FRL–9909–39– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Control of Air Pollution From Motor 

Vehicles, Vehicle Inspection and 

Maintenance and Locally Enforced 

Motor Vehicle Idling Limitations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Texas State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The 

revisions to the Texas Administrative 

Code (TAC) were submitted in 2002, 

2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012. 

These revisions are related to the 

implementation of the state’s motor 

vehicle emissions Inspection and 

Maintenance (I/M) program and the 

Locally Enforced Motor Vehicle Idling 

Limitations. The EPA is proposing to 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1