alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-52; RM-8987 and RM-9098]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Kellnersville and Two Rivers, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 246A to Two Rivers, Wisconsin, as 
that community's second local FM broadcast service in response to a 
petition filed by First Congregational Services. See 62 FR 6929, 
February 14, 1997. The coordinates for Channel 246A at Two Rivers are 
44-09-06 and 87-34-06. The counterproposal filed by Value Radio 
Corporation proposing the allotment of Channel 246A at Kellnersville, 
Wisconsin, has been dismissed. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated. A filing window for Channel 246A at Two Rivers will not be 
opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for 
this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 2, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 97-52, adopted January 7, 1998, and released 
January 16, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Channel 246A at Two Rivers.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1893 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<PAGE>

                         RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

                                Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS







      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-47803) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated
Employee Stock Savings Plan and Trust and in the related Prospectus of our
report dated February 6, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Reliability Incorporated included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.






                                         BY/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP  


Houston, Texas
March 13, 1998
































10kx23.wp1                          32
DLA Distribution Barstow, California

Mr. Robert “Kevin” Taylor

Director

Robert “Kevin” Taylor started his federal career in 1984 as a temporary worker 

at the Naval Aviation Depot, Cherry Point, North Carolina. In 1985, he 

was selected for a permanent position in the Inventory Department, Supply 

Directorate, MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina.

Taylor progressively assumed increased responsibility and in 1997, he became 

the Supervisor of the Inventory Integrity Division, Distribution Depot, Cherry 

Point, North Carolina. In 1998, he was a team member that prepared DDCN 

for the implementation of Defense Supply System. In 1999, he was a cadre 

member for the A-76 competition and in 2000, was instrumental in writing 

the PWS for the PPP&M satellite sites imbedded in the local Naval Aviation 

Depot.

In 2001, Taylor became the Deputy Commander of DDCN. At the conclusion of the A-76 competition in 2001, 

it was determined that DDCN would be outsourced to a commercial activity. Mr. Taylor worked closely with the 

DDC Transition Team, DDC Contracting Office, DDC Personnel Office, DDCN employees, and the incoming 

contractor to assure a smooth transition from a government run activity to a commercially contracted site.

Taylor assumed Command of DLA Distribution Cherry Point, NC on June 10, 2009 as Director.

Taylor earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration at East Carolina University in 1983. He 

is the recipient of numerous special service, incentive, and unit awards.
# UoI&PU (DoD Code Sequence)
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NEIGHBORS OF CASINO SAN ) 

### PABLO, an unincorporated ) 

### association, ) ) 

### ANDRES SOTO, ) ) 

### ANNE RUFFINO, ) ) 

### ADRIENNE HARRIS, ) ) 

### TANIA PULIDO, and ) ) 

### JULIA AREAS, ) ) 

### Plaintiffs, ) ) 

### v. ) 

### Civil Case No. 09-2384 (RJL) ) 

### KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity ) 

### as Secretary ofthe Interior, ) ) 

### LARRY ECHO HAWK, in his official ) 

### capacity as Assistant Secretary ofthe ) 

### Interiorfor Indian Affairs, ) ) 

### TRACIE STEVENS, in herofficial ) 

### capacity as Chairperson ofthe National ) 

### Indian Gaming Commission, and ) ) 

### NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ) 

### COMMISSION, ) ) 

### Defendants. ) )

# 11- ORDER**(March~** 2011) [#13] For the reasons set forth above, it is this

_ day ofMarch, 2011 hereby ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #l3] is GRANTED, and it is furtherORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED withprejudice on all

counts which fail to state a claim (Counts I, II, III; Counts VI and VII (to the extent they seekrulings on classifications ofspecific games before approving the Lytton gaming ordinance); and Counts VI, VII, and VIII (to the extent they seek enforcement of discretionary NIGC decisions which are not subject tojudicial review)), and DISMISSED withoutprejudice on all remaining counts overwhichthis Court has no subject-matterjurisdiction (all orparts ofCounts III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII). SO ORDERED.

2
No. 11-68.

#### Paul Gargano, et ux., Petitioners v. Thomas Graves Landing Condominium Trust, et al.

565 U.S. 881, 132 S. Ct. 248,

181 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5415.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

*143Same case below, 78 Mass. App. 1112, 938 N.E.2d 906.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JEROME ROBINSON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 342 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
# C_2015354EN.01000902.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Société Sodiaal International

(Case C-383/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Article 3 - Recovery of Community aid - Administrative penalty - Administrative measures - Limitation period))

(2015/C 354/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Société Sodiaal International

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that the limitation which it lays down is applicable not only to proceedings concerning irregularities which lead to the imposition of administrative penalties within the meaning of Article 5 thereof but also to proceedings which lead to the adoption of administrative measures within the meaning of Article 4 thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
No. 11-5262.

#### Albert Grandberry, Petitioner v. Shirley Harry.

565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 288,

181 L. Ed. 2d 173,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5535.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Kirksey v. 

State, 112 Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). We conclude that 

the district court did not abuse its discretion by not conducting an 

evidentiary hearing, see NRS 34.770(2); Nika v. State, 124 Nev. 1272, 

1300-01, 198 P.3d 839, 858 (2008) (holding that a petitioner is entitled to 

an evidentiary hearing only when specific factual allegations are asserted 

"that are not belied or repelled by the record and that, if true, would 

entitle him to relief"), and did not err by rejecting Bates' ineffectiveassistance claims. 

Bates also contends that "NRAP 3C has a chilling effect on the 

constitutional right to direct appeal and the constitutional right to 

effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal." In its order dismissing 

the petition, the district court noted that Bates failed to present any facts 

or authority in support of this claim. We have consistently rejected this 

argument, as Bates concedes, and again point out that NRAP 3C complies 

with the due process requirements of the state and federal constitutions. 

See Wood v. State, 115 Nev. 344, 352, 990 P.2d 786, 791 (1999). 

Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err by rejecting this 

claim, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

/ 

Hardesty 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A 

ittgargttg6.4, 1,. KMIAMMEMilM 
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Karla K. Butko 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3 

az :LleaNnit1111111111111BEINEWASEMEMONNIMMOr
No. 10-9531.

#### Carey Dale Grayson, Petitioner v. Kim T. Thomas, Interim Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 829, 132 S. Ct. 124,

181 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5264.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-5035.

#### Robert L. Poole, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 261,

181 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5294,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10755.

#### James Forney, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 168,

181 L. Ed. 2d 81,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6546,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 46 So. 3d 60.
No. 11-5233.

#### Jeremy T. Greene, Petitioner v. William Pollard, Warden.

565 U.S. 896, 132 S. Ct. 284,

181 L. Ed. 2d 170,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5573.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Temporary Closure of the Law Library

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Temporary closure to the public of the Commission's Law 
Library.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Because of painting, carpeting, and renovation, the 
Commission's Law Library will be closed to the public beginning Monday, 
July 20, 1998, and will be reopened to the public on Monday, August 17, 
1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven J. Kover or Maureen E. Bryant, 
Law Librarians, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-
3287.

    Issued: July 10, 1998.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18968 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
No. 10-10488.

#### Cherie Phillips, Petitioner v. Sanderson Beck, et al.

565 U.S. 838, 132 S. Ct. 146,

181 L. Ed. 2d 64,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6072.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 52.
No. 10-10811.

#### Jose E. Meza, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 175,

181 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6006.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         223,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                       583
<INVENTORY>                                    157,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,671
<PP&E>                                         172,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 852,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,126
<BONDS>                                        126,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     454,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   852,843
<SALES>                                        478,020<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,020
<CGS>                                          373,509<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  373,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                  66,924
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    731
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.82
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
<F2>These line items include certain amounts related to non-tangible products
(i.e.,) services, however, since the amounts related to services are not
disclosed in the financial statements, the total revenue and CGS figures,
respectively, have been shown on these line items for purposes of this
financial data schedule.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Cartoon, the
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and after reasonable inquiry:

                  3.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  4.       The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             LODGIAN, INC.

                                             By: /s/  RICHARD CARTOON
                                                -------------------------------
                                                         RICHARD CARTOON
                                                  Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3214 

To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and provide 

for the discoverability and admissibility of gun trace information in 

civil proceedings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. CROW, Mr. EVANS, 

Mr. BEYER, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KHANNA, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, 

and provide for the discoverability and admissibility of 

gun trace information in civil proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Jus5 tice for Victims of Gun Violence Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3214 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PROTEC2 TION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT. 

3 Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful 

4 Commerce in Arms Act (15 U.S.C. 7901–7903) are re5 pealed. 

6 SEC. 3. DISCOVERABILITY AND ADMISSIBILITY OF GUN 

7 TRACE INFORMATION IN CIVIL PRO8 CEEDINGS. 

9 The contents of the Firearms Trace System database 

10 maintained by the National Trace Center of the Bureau 

11 of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives shall not be 

12 immune from legal process, shall be subject to subpoena 

13 or other discovery, shall be admissible as evidence, and 

14 may be used, relied on, or disclosed in any manner, and 

15 testimony or other evidence may be permitted based on 

16 the data, on the same basis as other information, in a civil 

17 action in any State (including the District of Columbia) 

18 or Federal court or in an administrative proceeding. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E.
Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Carolinas.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 12, 2010



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/    JAMES E.
ROGERS                 
|James E. Rogers Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


Safety and Occupational Health Study Section: Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Safety and Occupational Health 
Study Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH), of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been 
renewed for a 2-year period beginning July 1, 1998, through June 30, 
2000.
    For further information, contact Pervis C. Major, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Coordination and Special 
Projects, Office of the Director, NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, 
Morgantown, West Virginia 26505. Telephone 304/285-5979.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-18825 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

MATHEW DOUGLAS WINCHELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30067

D.C. No. 4:02-cr-00108-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Mathew Douglas Winchell appeals from the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant’s request for oral 

argument is denied.

FILED

FEB 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-30067 

Winchell contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to 

reduce his sentence under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The 

district court acted within its discretion when it denied Winchell a sentence 

reduction based on the large quantities of drugs he supplied over a long period of 

time, his managerial role in the drug distribution enterprise, and the fact that he 

engaged in illegal activity in the presence of children. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. 

n.1(B); United States v. Lightfoot, 626 F.3d 1095-96, 1096 (9th Cir. 2010). 

Furthermore, notwithstanding the court’s failure to specifically address Winchell’s 

argument concerning his post-offense conduct, the court’s explanation of its denial 

was sufficient. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en 

banc).

AFFIRMED.