alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A1 9 A1 80 4 . KEVI N P. BENTLEY v . J OHN T. W I LCHER.

Kev i n P. Ben t l ey ap p eal s t o t h i s Co u rt fro m t h e tri al co u rt ’ s d en i al o f h i s p et i t i o n fo r hab eas co rp u s rel i ef. Un d er o u r Co ns t i t u t i o n, t h e Su prem e Co u rt h as

ex cl u s i v e ap p el lat e ju ri s d i ct i o n o ver al l cas es i n v o l v i ng h a b e a s co rp u s

. See Ga. Co n s t

. 1 9 8 3 , Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4 ). Th i s ap p eal i s t herefo re TRANSFERRED
t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 18, 2019

04/18/2019
No. 10-10712.

#### Patrick S. McPherron, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 162,

181 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6514.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-10690.

#### Mario Menchaca, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 159,

181 L. Ed. 2d 74,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5968.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy K. Armour,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                    The information contained in the report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy K. Armour        |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy K. Armour            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| Date: October 22,  2009 |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Janus CapitalGroup Inc. and will be retained by Janus Capital Group Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2706 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to clarify 

that charitable organization officials may receive food donations from 

schools under the food donation program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas (for himself and Mr. TAYLOR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to clarify that charitable organization officials may 

receive food donations from schools under the food donation program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feeding Hungry Stu5 dents in Schools Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2706 IH

1 SEC. 2. FOOD DONATION BY SCHOOLS THROUGH CHARI2 TABLE ORGANIZATION OFFICIALS. 

3 Section 9(l) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(l)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘, including from a fund7 raiser or charitable food drive, or’’ after ‘‘any 

8 food’’; 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘GENERAL.—Each’’ and 

10 inserting the following: ‘‘GENERAL.— 

11 ‘‘(A) FOOD DONATIONS PERMISSIBLE.— 

12 Each’’; and 

13 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) DONATIONS THROUGH CHARITABLE

15 ORGANIZATION OFFICIALS.— 

16 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Each school par17 ticipating in the school lunch program 

18 under this Act may donate the food de19 scribed in subparagraph (A) to a charitable 

20 organization through a charitable organiza21 tion official who is directly affiliated with 

22 the school and the local educational agency 

23 serving such school. 

24 ‘‘(ii) ANNUAL FOOD SAFETY TRAIN25 ING.—A charitable organization official 

26 may not receive donated food pursuant to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2706 IH

1 this subparagraph unless such charitable 

2 organization official has received a food 

3 safety certification, or other applicable cer4 tification, from the State health depart5 ment in the State such food is donated in. 

6 ‘‘(C) USE OF SCHOOL CAMPUS.—The food 

7 donated by a school pursuant to this paragraph 

8 may be received, stored, and distributed on the 

9 campus of such school. 

10 ‘‘(D) CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION OFFI11 CIAL DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term 

12 ‘charitable organization official’ means a person 

13 who has a memorandum of understanding with 

14 a charitable organization to receive food dona15 tions on behalf of such organization.’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘, includ17 ing guidance with respect to donations through char18 itable organization officials under paragraph 

19 (1)(B).’’ after ‘‘necessary’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2939 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain taxes 

and revenues. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. CARBAJAL, and Mr. GARAMENDI) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use 

of certain taxes and revenues. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Gen5 eral Sales Tax Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF REVENUES. 

7 (a) WRITTEN ASSURANCES ON USE OF REVENUE.— 

8 Section 47107(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2939 IH

1 (1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by strik2 ing ‘‘local taxes’’ and inserting ‘‘local excise taxes’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘State tax’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘State excise tax’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) This subsection does not apply to State or local 

7 general sales taxes nor to State or local generally applica8 ble sales taxes.’’. 

9 (b) RESTRICTION ON USE OF REVENUES.—Section 

10 47133 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding 

12 paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Local taxes’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘Local excise taxes’’; 

14 (2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘local 

15 taxes’’ and inserting ‘‘local excise taxes’’; 

16 (3) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘State tax’’ 

17 and inserting ‘‘State excise tax’’; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(d) LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY.—This sub20 section does not apply to— 

21 ‘‘(1) State or local general sales taxes; or 

22 ‘‘(2) State or local generally applicable sales 

23 taxes.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-10456.

#### Mark James Mason, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6223.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 53 So. 3d 1036.
W8086B-8108-6507

iM

il

HL)

W8086B-8108-6507

25, NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER & ADD (8-22)

7110-DSSAFE000

26. [UC (4-6) Ul (23-24) QTY (25-29) COND (74) DIST (55-56) UP (74-80)

EA 00001 H 0220629

27. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

16. FREIGHT CLASSIFICATION NOMENCLATURE

fatst als] of7 |2}2) 4 2 sIs}5 sl 5] selefefe) ef of 6] of of of 71 .7]747 717) 71 7178 7] 8 2 3
SOEG 12243) SLL ST SISESLST S SLELSH cdot of cl 2 3 aL} 4 Je] 9] o] | TOTAL PRICE SHIPPED FROM SHIP TO
F PRO | PRIIREQ’O Cj
Doc} RI |" DOLI ct
iDEN ROM a| ut | QuaNTiTy u Ject | ORI DEL JAD) RI ute OLLARS
D “ee $ 2,206.29 $ 2,206.29 | CETSA See Block 27
IA5J EA 00001 04 NA H ad 1
4, MARK FOR:
24. DOCUMENT NUMBER & SUFFIX (30-44) 5.DOC DATE 6. NMFC 7. FRT RATE. 8. TYPE CARGO 9. PS
8108
| | li | | | IUALUACKALA rv tT el ee ee “ ia

Ti7- TEM NOMENCLATURE
SAFE

18. TY CONT 419.NOCONT | 20. TOTAL WEIGHT

21. TOTAL CUBE

22. RECEIVED 3. DATE REC'D
D-/H
Task # 10U000 REL # Copy 1
nn Loc. EXCH

nN by £ 4 L 7

IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY sored
NO REASONABLE PROSPECT OF USE AND ITS REPAIR OR

COLUMBUS

DRMO COLUMBUS

JAMES RD GATE BLDG 9 STATION 8
3990 E. BROAD STREET

, OH 43213

REHABILITATION AS A UNIT IS CLEARLY IMPRACTICAL. IT HAS
NO VALUE FOR ITS BASIC CONTENT AND IT IS THEREFORE TURNED
IN FOR SCRAP OR SALVAGE.

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ONE COPY
FOR DISCREPANCY REPORTING USE SF 364

DD FORM 1348-1A

INSP BY

SELECTED BY

We certify and verify that the AEDA residue, Rang

inspected by us and to the best of our knowledge and

_ :

Printed Name / Job Title

USA CETSA

BUILDING 221, DOOR 7
BLUEGRASS STATION PO BOX 14064
Lexington, KY 40512

DSN: 745-3861

Serial Number(s):
102404

Printed Name / Job Title

BUILDING 221, DOOR 7

BLUEGRASS STATION PO BOX 14064
Lexington, KY 40512

DSN: 745-3861

USA CETSA fo
V f
2

e Residue, and/or Explosive Contaminated property listed has been 100 percent properly
belief, are inert and/or free of explosives or other dangerous materials.
**IC 01-04**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**September 5, 2001**

**IC 01-04**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**September 5, 2001**

**IC 01-04**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**September 5, 2001**

**AP8.18. APPENDIX 8.18**

**DISPOSAL RELEASE ORDER DENIAL**

**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

AP3.18-1

1

APPENDIX 3.18

AP8.18-1

APPENDIX 8.18

AP3.13-1

AP3.18-1

AP3.13-1
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FC1/FC2/GC1/GC2 FORMAT**

**BILLING FOR DECENTRALIZED, NONCATALOGUED, AND NONSTOCKED ITEMS**

107

APPENDIX 3.8

1
#### *State, Respondent, v. Brousseau, Petitioner,*

No. 91838-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32105-3-III, June 9, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1014. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 1, 2010
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer
**** IC 02-04

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.48. APPENDIX 8.48**

**MATERIEL RELEASE DOCUMENTDD FORM 1348-1A OR DD FORM 1348-2**

AP8.48-6

6

APPENDIX 3.48

AP8.48-1

APPENDIX8.48
Eric J. Pygi 

Deputy General Counsel 

Department of Energy 

Washington, D.C. 20585 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

WILLIAM J. BAER 

Assistant Attorney General 

Main Justice Building 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 

(202) 514-2401 / (202) 616-2645 (Fax) 

August 16,2014 

Re: Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standards 

Dear Deputy General Counsel Pygi: 

I am responding to your June 11, 2014 letter seeking the views of the Attorney 

General about the potential impact on competition of proposed energy conservation 

standards for commercial clothes washers. Your request was submitted under Section 

325(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) of the Energy Policy and Consen(ation Act, as amended (ECPA), 42 

U.S.C. 6295(0 )(2)(B)(i)(V), which requires the Attorney General to make a determination 

of the impact of any lessening of competition that is likely to result from the imposition 

of proposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's responsibility for 

responding to requests from other departments about the effect of a program on 

competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust 

Division in 28 CPR § OAO(g). 

In conducting its analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed 

standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice, 

by placing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, or by 

inducing avoidable inefficiencies in production or distribution of particular products. A 

lessening of competition could result in higher prices to manufacturers and consumers. 
We have reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (79 Fed. Reg. 12302, March 4,2014) (NOPR). We have also reviewed 

supplementary information submitted to the Attorney General by the Department of 

Energy. Based on this review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy conservation 

standards for commercial clothes washers are unlikely to have a significant adverse 

impact on competition. 

Sincerely, 

~Bae~~ 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  PocketSpec  Technologies  Inc.  (the
Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I. Janet Brophy,  Chief
                                                                              16
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

SEPTEMBER 20, 2004

                                                     By: /s/  Janet Brophy
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-1343.

#### Zoltan Szajer, et ux., Petitioners v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

565 U.S. 817, 132 S. Ct. 98,

181 L. Ed. 2d 26,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6661.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 607.
**Attachment v3**

**Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 20-1 Meeting (May 7, 2020)**

**Current as of March 22, 2021**

SPRC 20-1 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/DLMSPrograms/supply/ 

Page **4** of **5**

# image1.emf

# 51% Waiver Request Denied_NAVSUP HAZMAT 10_8_2014.pdf

# image2.emf

# PCAN 03 - 20 OCT 14 - GCPC PURCHASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.pdf

# image3.emf

# FMR Vol 11A REIM OPS.pdf

# image4.emf

# DoN ASN Memo of 3 May 2002 Reimbursable_Orders.pdf

# image5.emf

# 51% RULE CUSTOMER ADVISORY (v-1).pdf

# image6.emf

# CHANGE TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ORDERING PROCESS.PDF
No. 10-5630.

#### Wesley Ray Rogers, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 985,

178 L. Ed. 2d 813,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 390.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 329, 178 L. Ed. 2d 214, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7604.
No. 10-11057.

#### Derek N. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Maryland.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 208,

181 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6635,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 197 Md. App. 756.
No. 10-11037.

#### Jose E. Cervantes-Guerra, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 206,

181 L. Ed. 2d 110,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5982.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 789.
No. 10-10689.

#### William Blake Sescil, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 159,

181 L. Ed. 2d 74,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6469.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 758.
No. 10-7369.

#### Ramon Laroi Shorter, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1096, 131 S. Ct. 809,

178 L. Ed. 2d 541,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9584.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, John P. Mitola, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electric CityCorp. (“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of theRegistrant’s Board of Directors:
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theRegistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.   /s/ John P. Mitola     John P. Mitola  Chief Executive Officer  November 15, 2004  
- 30 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>    0000033656
<NAME>       ETHYL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           29972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   169451
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2317
<INVENTORY>                                     165882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                388512
<PP&E>                                          713635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  285327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  983787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           145770
<BONDS>                                         302973
<COMMON>                                        118444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      291684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    983787
<SALES>                                         960450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                960450
<CGS>                                           636056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   818021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (580)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               26833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 116176
<INCOME-TAX>                                     42213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              73963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     73963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>