alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p110150.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0150 Focus Ready Draft 1/20/2011

ENGINEER: Prothero \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Use safety glasses with side shields or goggles; gloves; and other protective clothing. Respirator: Use a purifying respirator equipped with filter for protection against dust. Health Effects: May be harmful if swallowed. Other exposure effects (i.e. skin, eyes, lungs) not specified. TLV/PEL: None established.

SAT (concerns) (01/14/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Same as . Analogs -> // Human Health Related Cases: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T2 . Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water

Page 1p110150.eng OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: Yes (0 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 12 >1000? No 2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: No 3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: No (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0150

Number of Sites/ Location: 4 unknown site(s) Days/yr: 200 Basis:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

Water or Air or Incineration or Landfill Output 2: 1.6E+0 kg/site-day over 200 days/yr from 4 sites or 1.2E+3 kg/yr to: Uncertain (land may be most likely, water least likely) from: Unloading Solid Raw Material from Transport Containers basis: User-Defined Loss Rate Model. The EPA/OPPT dust model estimates 0.5% release to uncertain media (water, Page 2p110150.eng

Page 4
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND CFO Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose. The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer an Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of Lodgian, Inc. (the Company), hereby each certify
that, to the undersigneds knowledge: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004 (the Report), which accompanies this Certification,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Dated
this 19th day of November, 2004. /s/ W. Thomas ParringtonW. Thomas Parrington, Chief Executive Officer/s/ Manuel Artime
Manuel Artime, Chief Financial Officer
July 25, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, I am writingthis letter, because I knowthatthe pollution levels in mycityare beyond legal requirements. River Rouge, Ecorse, and SW Detroit make up the 3rd most polluted zip code in the country. I also thinkthatthe Pet Coke thatwas stored illegally along the Detroit River played a part in my illness. I sufferfrom multiple illnesses, including chronic Bronchitis. My bodyfeels the effects ofthe pollution around me every day. Breathingfilthyair, drinking contaminated water, eating tainted vegetables from mygarden, all dcontain pollutants, and are taking a toll on me, and myfamily. In the year, 2013, I became very ill. I was rushed tothe hospital several times, only to have multiple test run on me, finding nothing, and sent back home to suffer. I was admitted tothe hospital three (3) times, and never really got an answer as to what was wrong. I went through a gall bladder operation, kidneyfailure, tofind out later, from the reports I requested, that I had high amounts of Benzene, in my system. I stronglysupport the new EPA emission standard for power plants and the proposed new emission standard for refineries. I would encourage you to hold a hearing on the latter in Detroit. Please allow us to tell you howthe environment we live in has affected our lives. It is time to put astop to the blatant disregard for ourcitizen's health. Mygrandfather died from lung disease, my mothersuffers from lung disease, and asthma runs deep in the entire family generations. I know that mychildren have been affected as well, but it is nottoo late forthem. We depend on you to maintain the highest standards for air and waterto protect public health. Sincerely, Donna M. Eady 16 E. Cicotte River Rouge, Ml 48218 313.624.7658
ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : O=CCCC2CCC3C1CCC(C1)C23

CHEM : 4,7

- Methano

- 1H

- indene

- 1

- propanal, octahydro

CAS Num: 1464989

- 16

- 9

ChemID1:

MOL FOR: C13 H20 O1

MOL WT : 192.30

Log Kow: 3.505 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: 4.800 (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value

- for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

Wat Sol: 3.809 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 13.4 (mg/L, User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

--------------------------------------

Log Kow : 4.800 (User Entered)

Wat Sol: 13.4 (mg/L, User Entered)

------------------------------------------------ Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

No Data Available

-- ------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.11 Class

- specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Aldehydes (Mono)

Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

=========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish 96

- hr LC50 0.376

Aldehydes (Mono) : Daphnid 48

- hr LC50 0.150

Aldehydes (Mono) : Green Algae 96

- hr EC50 0.432

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish ChV 0.019

Aldehydes (Mono) : Daphnid ChV 0.037 !

Aldehydes (Mono) : Green Algae ChV 0.289

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish (SW) 96

- hr LC50 0.524

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish (SW) ChV 0.101 !

================== ========= ================== ======== ====== ==========

Neutral Organic SAR : Fish 96

- hr LC50 0.483

(Baseline Toxicity) : Daphnid 48

- hr LC50 0.355

: Green Alg ae 96

- hr EC50 0.770

: Fish ChV 0.064

: Daphnid ChV 0.071

: Green Algae C hV 0.359Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to

measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the

water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES)

are repor ted.

NOTE: ! = exclamation designates: The toxicity value was estimated through

application of acute

- to

- chronic ratios per methods outlined in

the ECOSAR Methodology Document provided in the ECOSAR Help Menu.

-------- ---------------------- Class Specific LogKow Cut

- Offs

------------------------------ If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut

- offs

presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those

endpoints.

Alde hydes (Mono):

---------------- Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)

Baseline Toxicity SAR Limitations:

--------------------------------- Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96

- hr LC50; Daphnid LC50)

Maximum LogKo w: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. VINC ENT M AR TINEZ,

De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-30032

D.C . No. 1:97-c r-00037-DLC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Dana L . C hriste nse n, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 14, 2017 * * B e fore : GOODW IN, FARR IS, an d FER NANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Vinc e nt M artine z a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c o urt’ s orde r granting in pa rt his m otion for a

se nte nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED FEB 27 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).M artine z c onte nds tha t he is e ntitle d to a furthe r se nte nc e re d uc tion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to the

Se nte nc ing Guide line s. In light of the nature of M artine z ’ s offe nse and the othe r 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a ) se nte n c i ng fa c t ors, the distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

re duc ing M artine z ’ s se nte nc e to the high-e nd of the am e nde d Guide line s ran ge . Se eU.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10 c m t. n.1(B )(i); Unite d

State s v . Dunn , 728 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th C ir. 2013). M ore ove r, c o ntra ry to M artine z ’ s c onte ntion, thedistric t c ourt a de quate ly a ddre sse d his a

rgum e n ts for a

furthe r re duc t ion a

nd e xpla ine d

its se nte nc ing de c ision. Se e Unite d State s v . Trujillo , 713 F.3d 1003, 1009, 11 (9th C i r. 2013). AFFIRM E D.

1 6 - 3 0 0 3 2 2
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37437-37438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2857]

The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls; Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; DSP-94, Authority to 
Export Defense Articles and Defense Services sold under the Foreign 
Military Sales Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has sesubmitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:

    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired. 
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Authority to Export Defense 
Articles and Defense Services sold under the Foreign Military Sales 
Program.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-94.
    Respondents: Exporters of U.S. Munitions List items covered under 
the Foreign Military Sales Program.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,500 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
     Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
     Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting documents 
may be obtained from Charles S.

[[Page 37438]]

Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. Interested persons are invited to 
submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the 
proposed survey by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent 
to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, (202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18325 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
```
# Action Items

# Filtering Instructions

# image1.png

# image2.png
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mauro
Parissi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Mauro Parissi
    -----------------
Name: Mauro Parissi
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Approved Change 49 

Revision to DLMS Supplement (DS)

517M, Material Obligation Validation (MOV)

1. ORIGINATOR:

a. Sponsor: Supply Process Review Committee, Ellen Hilert, Co-Chair, DLA J673, 

Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO),703-767-0676 (DSN 427), 

ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply

3. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Revision to DS 517M, MOV.

b. Description of Change: This change modifies the DS to open the 2/QTY03/10 

to accommodate the unit of issue applicable to the material being validated. 

c. Procedures: Revise DLMS Supplements as indicated. Yellow highlighting in 

the enclosure identifies changes within the contest of the DS. 

# Location Revision Reason Federal IC 

1 2/QTY03/10 Open data element:

C001 Composite Unit of Measure

Add Federal Note: Use to identify the unit of issue for the 

material validated.

Add DLMS Note: DLMS users see the Unit of Issue and 

Purchase Unit Conversion Table for available codes.

Reinsertion of 

previously 

streamlined data to 

support DLSS-DLMS 

conversion. 

Open data 

element. 

Requires a 

Federal IC 

change prior 

to DS 

update.

d. Alternatives: None identified.

4. REASON FOR CHANGE: This change is required for successful conversion 

between the DLSS MOV transaction and the corresponding DLMS implementation. 

Under the original DLMS concept the unit of issue applicable to the MOV would be 

resident in both the sender and receiver’s systems and transmission was not considered 

necessary. Current thinking is that the unit of issue must be retained to support 

conversion and may be retained under the future DLMS.

5. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Supports DLMS implementation.
b. Disadvantages: None identified.

6. IMPACT: 

a. Publications. Corresponding Federal IC.

b. DAAS DLMS/DLSS conversion maps incorporate the above revision. No change 

required.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1643

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND Brian E. 

Frosh; NANCY K. KOPP, Treasurer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02830-GJH)

Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 27, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Cox, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 

civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torkornoo v. Maryland, No. 8:17-

cv-02830-GJH (D. Md., filed May 11, 2018; entered May 14, 2018). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard Goldenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated.


Dated: August 14, 2003                    /s/ RICHARD GOLDENBERG
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Goldenberg
                                          Chief Financial Officer
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 16, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. TERRI PRUITT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-3152 (D. Kan.) (05-CR-20054-CM)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before O’BRIEN, HOLLOWAY and McCONNELL , Circuit Judges.
On consideration of Ms. Pruitt’s pe tition for certiorari, the Supreme Court granted the petition and remanded to th is court of appeals for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007). We have done so, considering anew the district j udge’s findings and his sentence as well. We are persuaded that our determinations remain correct for reasons given in our earlier opinion, 502 F.3d 1154 (August 29, 2007 ). We here identify particular reasons why we conclude ourdeterminations were and are in accord with the principles stated in Galland Kimbrough v. United States , 128 S.Ct. 558 (2007).-2- In our panel opinion we noted that th e district court had first recognized that United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), had rendered the Sentencing Guidelines advisory and the judge expl ained that he was required to calculate Pruitt’s sentences under the Guidelines, but that he would consider the Guidelines range as one factor among other releva nt factors. 502 F.3d at 1157. We noted that the district judge then addressed th e sentence, closely tracking the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), considering the nature and circumstances of the offense, Pruitt’s history and characteristics and the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, provide just punishment, deter criminal conduct, and pr otect the public from further crimes of the defendant. 502 F.3d at 1157. We point ed out that in essence, the district court stated that although it had authority to vary from the Guidelines range, no factors warranted doing so. We said thatthe district court concluded that 292 months’ imprisonment was a reasonable sentence under the circumstances. Id.
We said that consistent with our opinion in United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050 (10th Cir. 2006), we would accord a presumption of reasonableness to a sentence within the Guidelines career-offender range. 502 F.3d at 1158. Gall emphasized that the appellate courts are to review the district court’s sentencing decisions under a deferential abuse-of-dis cretion standard whether the sentence is-3- within the Guidelines or not. Our pr evious opinion utilized that standard. Therefore we reinstate our previous j udgment and affirm the judgment of the district court.

Entered for the Court William J. Holloway, Jr. Circuit Judge
No. 10-10753.

#### Joseph R. Hurst, Petitioner v. Travis Hantke, et al.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 168,

181 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6316.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*81Same case below, 634 F.3d 409.
No. 10-10362.

#### Wayne Thomas Houff, Petitioner v. Rick Coursey, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution.

565 U.S. 835, 132 S. Ct. 138,

181 L. Ed. 2d 57,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5223.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 167.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, EricSmit, the chief financial officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
No. 11-5116.

#### Jabbar Latino Stroud, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 890, 132 S. Ct. 270,

181 L. Ed. 2d 159,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5276.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 632.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Frost,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                    The report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                    The information contained in the reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gregory A. Frost          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory A. Frost              |   |
| Executive Vice  President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|                          |   |
| Date: October 22,  2009  |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JanusCapital Group Inc. and will be retained by Janus Capital Group Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----