alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18997]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4281-N-06]

Withdrawal of Request for Comment on Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice withdraws the notice requesting public comments on 
information collection requirements for the Urban Empowerment Zone 
Initiative. The notice requesting public comments was published in 
error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Selvaggi, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 708-3773. This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 2, 1998 (63 FR 36253), HUD published 
a notice of proposed information collection requesting public comments 
for a period of 60 days on the proposed information collection 
requirements for the Urban Empowerment Zone (EZ) Initiative (Round 
Two). This notice was published in error. The 60-day public comment 
request on the information collection requirements for the EZ Round Two 
Initiative was contained in the interim rule published on April 16, 
1998 (63 FR 19109). Accordingly, this notice is withdrawn. The next 
notice to be published should be a notice that advises that OMB 
approval number 2506-0148 (the current OMB approval number for the EZ 
Round Two Initiative), which expires on August 31, 1998, has been 
approved for a period of three years.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Camille Acevedo,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 98-18997 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-P
```
No. 09-10178.

#### Justin L. Robertson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1079, 131 S. Ct. 635,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9210.

178 L. Ed. 2d 510,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-6684.

#### Brenda Lee Ford, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 541,

178 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8426.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 545.
REPORT TO CONGRESS

Recognize.

Monitor.

Care. 

The Management of 

Traumatic Brain Injury 

in Children
Improve Outcomes for Children 

After a Traumatic Brain Injury

BUMP

BLOW

JOLT

Children are at higher risk than adults for long-term effects of a traumatic 

brain injury (TBI) due to their developing brains. Many of the effects of a 

TBI happen after a child leaves the medical setting, so coordination among 

parents, healthcare providers, and schools is needed to bridge gaps in care.

REPORT TO CONGRESS

A TBI can be caused 

by a bump, blow, or 

jolt to the head.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

released a Report to Congress detailing information 

on current health and educational systems involved 

with the management of TBI in children. The report 

identifies gaps in care and describes actions that can 

be taken to address those gaps.

go.usa.gov/xnvbq

HOSPITAL

STAYS

640,000 18,000

EMERGENCY 

DEPARTMENT 

VISITS

IN 2013 ALONE, 

TBI AMONG CHILDREN 

CONTRIBUTED TO:
p110150.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0150

Focus Ready Draft 1/20/2011

ENGINEER: Prothero \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Use safety glasses with side shields or goggles;

 gloves; and other protective clothing.

Respirator: Use a purifying respirator equipped with

filter for protection against dust.

Health Effects: May be harmful if swallowed. Other

exposure effects (i.e. skin, eyes, lungs) not specified.

TLV/PEL:

None established.

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (01/14/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Same as . Analogs ->

 // Human Health

Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T2 .

Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

Page 1
p110150.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: Yes (0 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 12 >1000? No

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: No

3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100

days/yr: No

 (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr:

No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0150

Number of Sites/ Location: 4

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 200

Basis: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Air or Incineration or Landfill

Output 2: 1.6E+0 kg/site-day over 200 days/yr from 4 sites

or 1.2E+3 kg/yr

to: Uncertain (land may be most likely, water least

likely)

from: Unloading Solid Raw Material from Transport

Containers

basis: User-Defined Loss Rate Model. The EPA/OPPT dust

model estimates 0.5% release to uncertain media (water,

Page 2

p110150.eng

 

Page 4
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ness
Lakdawala, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


December 12, 2003
                                                 By: /s/ Ness Lakdawala
                                                     ------------------
                                                 Name:   Ness Lakdawala
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### *State, Respondent, v. Howerton, Petitioner,*

No. 91798-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71837-1-1, March 30, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 357. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 11-5256.

#### William Harvey Cousins, Petitioner v. Kathleen S. Green, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 287,

181 L. Ed. 2d 173,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5546.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 278.
***IC 01-04***

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

***November 5, 2001***

**DECEMBER 2001 DRAFT**

**DoD 4000.25-8-M****

DLM 4000.25, Volume 6, June 5, 2012

**APPENDIX 2.11**

**AUTHORIZED EXCEPTIONS, SPECIAL PROCESSES, AND DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION DATES**

**(INTRODUCTION)**

## AP2.11.1. INTRODUCTION

### AP2.11.1.1.  DoD policy concerning the implementatio of MAPAD procedures is contained in DoD Directive 4140.1 (reference (a)), and is summarized in chapter 1, paragraph G., of this manual.

### AP2.11.1.2.  Separate intra-Service/Agency systems/procedures will not be developed or used unless an authorized exception, special process, or delayed implementation date has been approved by the MAPAD System Administrator in accordance with the DUSD(P&L). The following rationale is applicable only to DIs pertaining to MILSTRIP supply distribution system(s)

### AP2.11.1.3.  Requests for exceptions, special processes, or delayed implementation dates will be forwarded by concerned focal points to the MAPAD System Administrator for consideration when it can be demonstrated the MAPAD cannot provide a workable method or procedure or that, for some reason beyond the control of the focal point or concerned Service/Agency, an approved change cannot be implemented on the scheduled date.

### AP2.11.1.4.  Requests for exceptions, special processes, or delayed implementation dates will not be granted solely to accommodate existing internal systems and procedures. 

### AP2.11.1.5.  Requests for exceptions or special procedures will be forwarded to the MAPAD System Administrator by the Service/Agency focal point for review and coordination, if required, with DoD Components, affected Federal Agencies, foreign governments, and industrial organizations and shall provide the following minimum information:X

### AP2.11.1.6. Narrative description of the basic concept being proposed and reason(s) therefor. 

#### AP2.11.1.6.1.  Known interface and impact requirement with other DLSS and Services/Agencies. 

#### AP2.11.1.6.2.  Advantages/disadvantages of request. 

#### AP2.11.1.6.3.  Proposed wording required for appendix C.  

#### AP2.11.1.6.4.  Starting and ending dates of request.X

## AP2.11.2.  FMS ADDRESSES – SECTION B

## AP2.11.3.  MAP GRANT AID ADDRESSES – SECTION C

AP2.1-1

AP3.1-2

AP2.11-1

APPENDIX 2.11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,469,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,317
<COMMON>                                     6,564,330
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,036,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
2-84988 and 2-99610 on Form S-8 of Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc. of our report
dated March 22, 2002, relating to the balance sheets of Fairmount Chemical Co.,
Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' (deficit) equity and comprehensive loss, cash flows,
and the financial statement schedule - valuation and qualifying accounts for the
years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc.

Our report dated March 22, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements and financial statement schedule -
valuation and qualifying accounts do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                                                  /S/ KPMG LLP





Short Hills, New Jersey
April 10, 2002
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.12-1 APPENDIX 8.12

AP8.12. APPENDIX 8.12

MATERIEL RELEASE ORDER/

FOLLOW-UP FOR MATERIEL RELEASE 

ORDER/LATERAL REDISTRIBUTION ORDER

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC A5_/AF6.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter the RIC indicating the source to which 

the material release order (MRO)/followup 

is directed.

Media and Status 7 Enter the M&S code as shown in the 

original requisition.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter NSN or part number of the item 

ordered for release. For subsistence items, 

enter type of pack in rp 21.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter U/I.

Quantity1 25-29 a. Enter quantity for which MRO/followup is 

provided.

b. For ammunition and ammunition related

items only (items in Federal supply group 

(FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 1427, 

1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 8140), enter an 

M in rp 29 to express in thousands any 

quantity exceeding 99,999. Example:

Express a quantity of 1,950,000 as 1950M 

(1950 in rp 25-28 and an M in rp 29).

Document Number 30-43 Enter document number as shown in the 

requisition.

Suffix 44 a. Enter the suffix code applicable to 

quantity in rp 25-29 when the requisitioned 

quantity is divided into separate actions.

b. When the requisitioned quantity is not 

divided, this field shall be left blank.

1 See Appendix AP3.1 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.1.3.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.12-2 APPENDIX 8.12

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Supplementary Address 45-50 Enter data from original requisition.

Signal 51 Enter data from original requisition.

Fund 52-53 Enter data from original requisition.

Distribution 54-56 When used as a followup to an laterial 

redistribution order (LRO) of retail assets, 

enter “2" for consumables or “3" for 

reparables in rp 54; otherwise, enter data 

as shown in the material release order 

(MRO).

Project 57-59 Enter data from original requisition.

Priority 60-61 Enter data from original requisition.

Required Delivery 

Date/Required Delivery 

Period2

62-64 Enter data from original requisition.

Advice 65-66 Enter data from original requisition.

Routing Identifier Code 67-69 Enter RIC applicable to the activity 

originating the MRO/followup. When the 

MRO format is used as a followup, enter 

the inventory control point ( ICP) RIC if 

shipment status in reply is to be furnished 

to the supply source.

Ownership 70 Enter ownership code, as applicable.

Supply Condition 71 Enter appropriate condition code.

Management 72 Enter management code applicable to the 

transaction.

Intra-Service/Agency 73 For use under intra-Service/Agency (S/A)

procedures. Leave blank for inter-S/A 

transactions.

Unit Price 74-80 Enter unit price applicable to the NSN or 

part number shown in rp 8-22.

2Use of RDP for conventional ammunition last reported as not implemented by united States Air Force 

(USAF). Refer to AMCL 148.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

Date: May 10, 2006

| |  | BY: /s/ William R. Walker
Name:  William R. WalkerTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
No. 10-6657.

#### Keith Leroy Tharpe, Petitioner v. Stephen Upton, Warden.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 655,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9052.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.
No. 11-5058.

#### Leroy P. Mitchell, Petitioner v. The Dallas Housing Authority.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 87,

181 L. Ed. 2d 18,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6805.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# Table 10. Incremental Costs from 2011 Final Rule to 2012 Reconsideration Final Rule

**Incremental MA CT Floor Control, Monitoring, Reporting, and Recordkeeping Costs** 

**A. Compliance by additional control only**

Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas 0 -$526,381 -$218,879

Energy recovery unit - Solids -8 -$128,371,421 -$70,253,729 Incinerator 1 $1,440,644 $339,811 Small, remote 14 $11,401,648 $3,228,022 Waste-burning kiln 11 $299,948,355 $109,065,849 $183,892,845 $42,161,073


### B. Compliance or M

**ost Inexpensive Disposal Alternative**

**Subcategory Inventory**  **Change (# of Units)**  **Capital Costs**

**(2008$) An**  **nualized Costs**

**(2008$)**

Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas 0 -$526,381 -$218,879

Energy recovery unit - Solids -8 -$128,371,421 -$70,253,729 Incinerator 1 $0 -$17,785 Small, remote 14 $1,037,688 $1,784,762 Waste-burning kiln 11 $299,948,355 $109,065,849 $172,088,241 $40,360,218 **Subcategory Inventory**  **Change (# of Units)**  **Capital Costs**

**(2008$) An**  **nualized Costs**

**(2008$)**

# Table 10. Incremental Costs from 2011 Final Rule to 2012 Reconsideration Final Rule

**C. Incremental Cost Breakdown by Reason for Change**

**Capital Costs (2008$)**  **An nualized** 

**Costs (2008$) Capital Costs** 

**(2008$) An**  **nualized**

**Costs (2008$)**

Energy recovery unit - Liquid/Gas -$526,381 -$218,879 $0 $0

Energy recovery unit - Solids -$57,646,097 -$43,605,371 -$70,725,324 -$26,648,357 Incinerator $165,857 $60,845 $1,274,788 $278,966 Small, remote -$1,768,962 -$497,617 $13,170,610 $3,725,638 Waste-burning kiln $101,809,948 $44,031,686 $198,138,408 $65,034,162 $42,034,365 -$229,336 $141,858,481 $42,390,409 **Subcategory Regulatory**  **or Data Changes Inventory**  **change**More stingent CO limit, but lower baseline determined for WAEmeraldKalama U-2, so no

longer requires CO oxidation catalyst 8 units cut from inventory; for remaining 22 units: New ACI algorithm (higher TCI, lower TAC), Added O2 Monitoring, 1 unit added to inventory; more stringent CO limit (CO Span Adjustment method) - TXSterlingChemTexasCity needs afterburner retrofit 2 units cut from inventory; 16 units added to inventory; CO Span Adjustment method revision; less stringent limits for Cd, CO, HCl, PM, and D/F. For original 12 units: 9 additional wet scrubbers, 1 wet scrubber removal, 4 new ACI, 2 new RTO, 1 RTO removal, 2 fabric filter improvements; 11 new units **Notes**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             233
<SECURITIES>                                        45
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,673)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,943
<PP&E>                                         223,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                (49,457)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (36,843)
<BONDS>                                      (190,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (264,062)
<SALES>                                       (27,839)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (27,839)
<CGS>                                              409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,963
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1321.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1321.02


</TABLE>
No. 10-6680.

#### Joseph Humphrey, Petitioner v. Millicent Warren, Warden.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 658,

178 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9182.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Joseph Bernstein


6663 Casa Grande Way


Delray Beach, FL 33446


 


Re:       Transition Consulting Services


 


Dear Joe:


 


This letter sets forth the understanding and agreement
between Grandparents.com, Inc. (“GPCM”) and you regarding certain consulting services you have agreed to provide to
GPCM following the termination of your employment with GPCM. Specifically, you agree to provide part-time financial services as
an Interim Chief Financial Officer of GPCM, acting in an independent consultant capacity, as may be requested from time to time
by GPCM at a rate of $10,000 per month commencing on the date hereof. Either party may terminate this side letter upon 30 days’
prior written notice. GPCM acknowledges that you have represented that you are currently a Florida resident.


 


Very truly yours,


 


[Name]


 


[Title]


 


Acknowledged and Agreed to


 








	 	 
	Joseph Bernstein