DAAS-VL (VLL) PAGE 2 21 May 92
SUBJECT: DoD MILSTRIP Focal Point Committee Meeting 92-1,
December 3-4, 1991

e. Are DLA and other service/agencies ready to change internal programs to
recognize the joint-service concept so that processing is compatible with
DAAS? Currently DLA will produce an "AX1" transaction for Navy contractor
requisitions if rp 74-75 is not less than or equal to "90". How will this be
accomplished for an Air Force contractor code in rp 45 with Navy in rp 30?

3. The idea of processing joint-service requisitions based on the
non-contractor service code does not appear to be a workable method of
handling the problem. The existing DAAS logic used to process GFM
transactions is already complicated and difficult to maintain and the
introduction of this additional edit cannot be done effectively.

4. As an alternate solution for processing joint-service requisitions it is
suggested that after the current DAAS GFM service/agency processing has been
performed, DAAS will check the RIC in rp 4-6 for ANY valid MCA RIC before
rejecting "CL". If rp 4-6 is equal to ANY valid MCA then DAAS will pass to
the RIC in rp 4-6, This would allow joint-service requisitions to pass to
another service/agency MCA. Transactions coming out of the MCA would then
contain the appropriate MCA RIC in rp 74-76 for the validation process. This
requires a minimal change to DAAS programming.

FOR THE DIRECTOR:

L f

ALVIN G. ARMSTRONG

Acting Deputy for Logistics

Defense Automatic Addressing
System Office



WN REPLY

Sef 2 “72

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
DEFENSE AUTOMATIC ADDRESSING SYSTEM OFFICE
GENTILE STATION, 1080 FRANKLIN STREET
DAYTON, OH 45444-5320

rerento, DAAS-VL (VLL/Mr. Strickler/DSN 986-6395/Ext 295/1m) 21 May 92

SUBJECT: DoD MILSTRIP Focal Point Committee Meeting 92-1,
December 3-4, 1991

TO: DLSSD-D

1, Reference Minutes: MILSTRIP Focal Point Committee Meeting 92-1,
December 3-4, 1991.

2. In accordance with paragraph II.C.6.a. of the above reference, the
Committee proposed that DAAS use the processing rules established for the
specific non-contractor Service code as identified in rp 30 or 45 for
joint-service requisitions. DAASO was to evaluate the feasibility of this
approach. As a result of this evaluation many problem areas surfaced that
would make this difficult if not impossible to accomplish.

a. Air Force GFM logic checks rp 4-6 of contractor requisitions for a valid
Air Force MCA RIC. If a valid MCA RIC is present, rp 54-56 is overlaid with
the corresponding distribution field entry provided by the Air Force. This
could not be done if the service code in rp 30 was other than Air Force
because the resulting distribution field entry would no longer represent an
Air Force activity. If this field is not overlaid, will the Air Force have
problems processing the transaction? It is believed the Air Force checks rp
54-56 prior to delivery to MCA.

b. Army GFM logic will automatically validate requisitions when the
contractor code is other than one of the "C_" activities described in Appendix
Dl. This would result in the automatic validation of all joint-service
requisitions where Army is the non-contractor Service code used to determine
processing rules.

c. Navy GFN logic checks for a date in rp 74-75 of the requisition.
Requisitions without a date in this field are rejected even if there is a
valid Navy MCA in rp 4-6. The Navy is the only service that requires this
entry. There is an assumption here that a contractor doing business with more
than one service using the same contractor DoDAAC is going to be able to
format each one differently. Can we assume this is practical when contractors
within services have difficulty? Does DLA want to change its program logic to
apply Navy date check for rp 74-75 for joint-service requisitions?

d. Current DAAS processing passes all "AX1" transactions through a single
routine, Joint-service transactions would require a separate routine for each
service, Current DAAS program validates Army contractor transactions if there
is no MCA RIC in rp 74-76. If DAAS is applying Air Force logic then this
would not occur but program would go on to check rp 54 for MCA. This returns
us to the question in 2.a., what is going to be in rp 54?


VA“ me oe
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Ave

USAMC MATERIEL READINESS SUPPORT ACTIVITY
LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40511-5101

13 MAR 1992
AMXMD-SM (310-1q)

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, Naval Supply Systems Command, ATTN: SUP 0323,
Washington, DC 20376-5000

SUBJECT: Navy Rejection of Army Contractor Requisitions

1. Reference memorandum, DLSSD, DLSSD-D, 10 Feb 92, subject: DOD MILSTRIP
Focal Point Committee Meeting 92-1, 3-4 Dec 91, with meeting minutes attached.

2. As indicated from discussions with the Navy MILSTRIP Focal Point, the Navy
May be rejecting Army contractor requisitions with DI Code AO_ and RI Code SHA
or SGA in record position 74-76. Page 1 of the enclosed printout contains
MILSTRIP DI Code AE_ “CL° rejects received 10 Mar 92 from RI Code N32 for Army
contractor identified requisitions which should have been received by Navy in
the DI Code AQ_ format. It appears that an up-front edit is still in-place
which prevents Navy from processing Army contractor requisitions.

3. Page 2 of the enclosure containg additional DI Code AE_ “CL° rejects for
Navy requisitions. It appears that due to the initial edits in-place within
Navy, you are unable to process your Service requisitions when an entry in
record position 45 indicates a contractor Service designator although the data
is not contractor related and is only significant to the requisitioner.

4. Request your immediate attention to provide Army with instructions which
will enable Navy to process our contractor requisitions as a minimum interim
measure until corrective action can be taken by your system design activity.

5. The POC is Mel Richards, DSN 745-4102/3893.

Ly be

Enel GEPRGE L. GILES
Chief, Supply Division

FOR THE COMMANDER:

CF (w/encl):
CDR, AMC, ATTN: AMCLG-MS/AMCLG-SSP
DER, DLSSD, ATTN: DLSSD-D


Subject: RAW DATA FOR 10 MAR 92
To: MRICHARD@lexington~emhl. army.mil
Ce: AMXLCS@SF~EMH1.ARMY.MIL

ENCLOSED IS RAW DATA FOR 10 MAR 92

FOR DIC EQ 'AE_' 'EX_'

STATUS EQ 'CL' 'DB' *DJ' 'DN' ‘DQ’ ‘DR
NUMBER OF RECORDS: 99

JOB ID: R125601

LCA POC: JENY BRIZGALOFF

START
1 3/10/92 PAGE 1
SUMMARY REPORT BY DIC FOR
RAW INPUT DATA WITH DIC AE_ AND AX_ AND
STATUS CODES CL, DB, DJ, DN, DQ AND DR
RUN DATE: 3/10/92 TAPE DATE: 92 MARIO
DIC STAT TALLY
ie) XEL cL 13
XEl DR 3
XEL 16
to) XE2 cL 29
XE2 DR 5
XE2 34
0 XE3 cL 45
XE3 DB 2
XE3 DR 2
XE3 49
0 99
1 3/10/92 PAGE 1
SUMMARY REPORT BY STATUS CODE FOR
RAW INPUT DATA WITH DIC AE_ AND AX_ AND
STATUS CODES CL, DB, DJ, DN, DQ AND DR
RUN DATE: 3/10/92 TAPE DATE: 92 MARIO
STAT DIC TALLY
0 cL XEl 13
cL XE2 29
cL XE3 45
cL 87
0 DB XE3 2
DB 2
0 DR XEL 3
DR XE2 5
DR XE3 2
DR 10
0 99
1 3/10/92
DETAIL RECORDS FOR 92 MAR10
XE3N32M2925004417073 EA00001C1GCL820660101 W61DEVBTK 06069CLN32 Agny RQNS
XE2N32M2925004417073 EA00001C1GCL820660101 W61DEVBTK 06069CLN 32
XE3N3283040011629450 £A00001W23A6C20694002 CNOCGOJFG _A0G02069CLN32 , L

©


XE3GSAU80 30002758114
XE2GSAU80 30002758114
XEIFFZK61100 10653716
XELFFZK6110005982567
XELFFZK6110005982567
XE2S9CM25 10011546906
XE2S9CM 2510011493465
XE2S9CM25 10011475576
XE2S9CM 2930011659595
XE3S9E014933

XE3NDZT47 30001421958

DETaL REcoens FoR 10 MAR GZ,

PT00001CA0G642023M027
PTOOO0 1CA0G64202 3M027
E£A00001CNOCGO012035012
EAOOOO2CNOCGO12264001
EAOO002CNOCGO15124004
EAO0001CAOAP420090014
EA0000 1 CAOAP420090025
EA00001 CAOAP 420090024
AY00001CA0AP 420090026
E£A00010WM1Q6011411403
E£A00020R07 1982064P 038

W45NSUKTK
W45NSUKTK
WSOQJKKFG
CNOCGOAFG
CNOCGOAFG
W16BCTRKTK
WI6BCTRTK
W16BCTKTK
W16BCTRIK
E80YY9CIVG
CPOS2 AKZ

Pa ge 2.

06067 CLGSA 000010
06067CLGSA 00C010
FBZ05069DRFFZ2069004359
FBZ02069DRFFZ2069002979
FBZ02069DRFFZ 2069002979
13069DRS9C 001558
13069DRS9C 000628
13069DRS9C 000954
13069DRS9C 000876
O5069CLS9E

9CEP5 15069 CLND:

XE INDZT4730001421958
XE3NDZT597 5001944998
XE1ND2T597 5001944998
XE3ND21597 5006820559
XE INDZT597 5006820559
XE3NDZT5120002339482
XEINDZT5120002339482
XE3NDZT8 135001607762
XEINDZT8 135001607762
XE3ND2ZT52 10002630376
XEIND2T5210002630376
XE3NDZT5440005 144485
XE 1NDZT5440005 144485
XE3NDZT5110007196061
XE1NDZT5110007196061
XE3NDZT5310008892763
XE 1NDZT5310008892763
XE3NDZT80 10009262135
XEIND2ZT80 10009262135
XE3NDZT5320014089928
XEINDZT5320014089928

EAQQ020R07 1982004P038
£A00010R071982064P 036
EA000 10R07 1982064P036
EA00010R071982064P 037
EA000 10R071982064P 037
EA00003R07 1982064P039
EA00003R07 1982064P039
ROO0004RO07 1982064P022
RO00004R071982064P022
EA00002R07 1982064P023
£A00002R071982064P023
£A00002R07 1982064P 024
EA00002R07 1982064P024
EA00002R07 1982064P032
E£A00002R07 1982064P032
BX00002R071982064P044
BX00002R07 198 2064P 044
KT0000 2R07 1982064P 047
T0000 2R07 198 2064P 047
HD00010R071982064P018
HD00010R071982064P018

CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 AKZ
CPOS2 ARZ
CPOS2 AKZ

9CEP515069CLNDZ
9GEP515069CLNDZ
9GEP515069CLNDZ
9GEPS 15069CLNDZ
9GEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP5 15069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP5 15069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9QEP515069CLNDZ
9ZEPS15069CLNDZ
9ZEPS15069CLNDZ v

XESBIOK59990106590IT
XE1B16K5999010659011
XE3B17T8145002881397
XE3B17T8145002881397
XE3S9GM6220011604247
XE2S9GM6220011604247
XE3MPB85999010659011
XE3MPBO5 120011695300
XE3S9EY5920011357677
EZTROO3

LCA CONTACT DSN586-5801 CM415-561-5801 AMXLC-S

#5950
10539
NNNN

EAUOOOZCNOAS420580017
EA00002CN0AJ420580017
EA00008W58H0Z2058A505
E£A00008W58H0Z 20354501
EA00004CA0AP420450011
EA00004 CA0AP420450011
EA00002CN0AJ420580017
E£A00001CK304211642318
£A000 LOCGAD6F 13460132
99 INPUT VFM

W8OQIKLPC
W80QJRLPC
CHOG7JID9E
CHOG7JID9E
W16BCTKTK
W16BCTRIK
W80QJKLPCP
WSLDSMLWVV
W36QP5BFGT
FIX BLK

13069CLB16
13069CLB16
03069DBB17
03069DBB17
13069DRS9G
13069DRS9G
13068CLMPB
12068CLMPB
12068DR

020360
020360
000787
000787
000023
000023

80

JENY BRIZGALOFF

NAVY ONS