alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCES SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,422,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,881,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,941,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,451,900
<PP&E>                                       8,785,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,599,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,638,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          959,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,400,000
<COMMON>                                     8,293,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,995,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,698,100
<SALES>                                     12,805,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,805,500
<CGS>                                        9,689,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,689,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,127,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,857,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,857,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,857,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-6618.

#### John-Pierre Baney, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board.

562 U.S. 1194, 131 S. Ct. 999,

178 L. Ed. 2d 855,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 704,

January 18, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Leave to proceed as a veteran granted. *856Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 360 Fed. Appx. 119.
No. 10-7749.

#### Earl G. Bush, Sr., Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 965,

178 L. Ed. 2d 794,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 48.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 43 So. 3d 47.
No. 10-11053.

#### Mauricio Alfredo Pena-Manzanarez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 208,

181 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6464.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 687.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2006,
of El Paso Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Foshee, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Douglas L. FosheeDouglas L. FosheePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 7, 2006 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Corporation and will be retained by El Paso Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In re the Complaint of

JET CENTER PARTNERS, LLC

Complainant,

- against

COUNTY OF MONTROSE, COLORADO

Respondent.

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Docket No.: 16

- 15

- 11

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY

1. On September 17 , 2015, the Respondent submitted its Motion for Summary

Judgment in Docket No. 16

- 15

- 11 . Under the Part 16 Procedural Rules, a response to a

motion and a Reply shall be made within ten days of the date of service. Absent this

Motion, the deadline for Reply would be September 26, 2015.

2. The Complainant hereby requests an extension to the deadline, until and

including Oct ober 16, 2015

, to submit its Reply. Through its Motion for Summary

Judgment, the Respondent has presented new information concerning its relationship with

a third party, MTJ FBO , which is a significant factor to the Complainant and aeronautical

users of the Airport . The Complainant wishes to have sufficient time to evaluate this new

information and how it affects the pendency of its Part 16 Complaint.2

Dated: September 24 , 201 5

Jericho, New York

________________________________ Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq.

Shelley A. Ewalt, Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainants

500 North Broadway , Suite 129

Jericho, New York 11753

Tel: (516) 364

- 1095

Fax : (516) 364

- 0612CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that on September 24 , 2015, I served the foregoing Motion to

Extend Deadline to Reply on the following persons electronically:

Office of the Chief Counsel

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC

- 610

Federal Aviati on Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

9

- AWA

- AGC

- Part

- 16@faa.gov

Bobbee J. Musgrave, Esq.

Stephen D. Rynerson, Esq.

Bryan Cave LLP

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4100

Denver, CO 80203

B obbee. M usgrave@bryancave.com

Stephen. R ynerson@bryancave.com

Counsel to County of Montrose, Colorado

Carolyn Clawson, Esq.

County Attorney, County of Montrose, Colorado

Montrose County Attorney’s Office

161 S. Townsend Avenue

Montrose, Colorado 81401

cclawson@montrosecounty.net

___________________________ Shelley A. Ewalt , Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainant

500 North Broadway , Suite 129

Jericho, New York 11753

sewalt@mklawnyc.com

Tel: (516) 364

- 1095

Fax: (516) 364

- 0612
----

Exhibit 32.1

**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George Kazantzis, President (President and Principal Financial Officer) and Nicholas Pappas (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 10th day of August 2006.

|   |  /s/ George Kazantzis                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                 |
|   | George Kazantzis      President and Principal Financial Officer |

|   |  /s/ Nicholas Pappas                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                    |
|   | Nicholas Pappas       Chief Executive Officer |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODERICK L. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

XAVIER BECERRA * , Attorney General;

JAMES C. SANCHEZ,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15168

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 02993

- MCE

- AC

MEMORANDUM **

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018 ***

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Roderick L. Mitchell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging a violation of the ex post facto clause of the United

* Xavier Becerra has been substituted for his predecessor, Kamala D.

Harris , as Attorney General under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

** This dispositio n is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15168

States Constitution . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dis missal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler

,

627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mitchell’s action because Mitchell

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that California Pena l Code § 2 90.46 has a

punitive purpose or effect. See U.S. C ONST

. ART

. I, § 9, cl. 3; Smith v. Doe , 538

U.S. 84, 104

- 05 (2003) ( setting forth factors for determining whether a statute i s

punitive for purposes of the ex post f acto clause )

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

Becerra ’s request for judicial notice, set forth in his answering brief, is

granted

.

AFFIRMED.
#### State, Respondent, v. Stump, Petitioner,

No. 91531-8.

Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32015-4-III, February 26, 2015. *Granted*September 30, 2015.
DLA DISPOSITION SERVICES  CONTRACT  NUMBER 99-4001-0004

Supplemental Agreement 9

Page 2 of 2

**WHEREAS,**Part II, Section B, Product Pool and Property Flow states in pertinent part that:

The property in the Product Pool is all “scrap” material, and all items that are subject to “Demilitarization as a Conditions of Sale,” for which DLA Disposition Service is accountable, other than material and items in the list of excluded SCLs and FSCs set forth in Part IV, with DEMIL Codes “A,” “B,” “E,” or “Q” or that are subject to “Demilitarization as a Condition of Sale,”  that become available in the Continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii and Guam as outlined in Supplemental Agreement #6, (other than Tennessee and the Carolinas).

**WHEREAS,**the contract currently does not cover Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands,  albeit these sites are all in close proximity to the existing sites on the Commercial Venture (CV) contract which covers DLA Disposition Service’s usable property,

and, **WHEREAS**, in the interest of achieving cost savings for both, the Purchaser and the Agency, as was used for the rationale of the consolidation for the Scrap Venture (SV) contract, executed in Supplemental Agreement 1 under this contract, the parties hereto mutually agree to modify Part II, Section B. to include Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into the contract property stream. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto to this modification that:

1. Part II, Section B. is hereby modified to include Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into the Scrap Venture contract property stream.

2. Purchaser to implement scrap operations for both sites no later than 60 days after effective date of modification.

3. Purchaser agrees to pay for all property received at the original bid price of $0.0001 per pound  and that revenue distributions will maintain the current split of 23/75.2/1.8 as outlined in Supplemental Agreement 5, paragraphs 5 and 6

4. All costs associated with the normal operation and performance under the contract will be deemed as Direct Costs. Specific requirements may be deemed as Seller Indirect costs and will be reviewed on a case by case basis.

5. The Government reserves the right to request specific advertising of scrap within the locale where property is received.

6. All other applicable terms and conditions of the contract remain in effect, including but not limited to Parts I-VI, and Articles One (1) through Twenty-Three (23); and Supplemental Agreements 1-8 remain in effect

7. This modification will become effective upon the date of the last affixed signature to this modification.

////////////NOTHING FOLLOWS////////////
No. 10-11294.

#### Isaac Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 877, 132 S. Ct. 240,

181 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6982.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 623 F.3d 672 and 397 Fed. Appx. 314.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of persona privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel ZAA1-EE-3 (RFP-AA-98-07).
    Date: July 17, 1998.
    Time: 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409, Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Antonio Noronha, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Extramual Review Branch, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Suite 409, 6000 Executive Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-7722.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol 
Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-18633 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP.3.54. APPENDIX 3.54**

**LOGISTICS REASSIGNMENT STORAGE INFORMATION**

## 

2

**AP3.58-**

AP3.54-1

APPENDIX 3.54
No. 10-332.

#### Michael J. McGuan, et al., Petitioners v. Endovascular Technologies, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 822,

178 L. Ed. 2d 556,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9684.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 182 Cal. App. 4th 974, 106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 277.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                               ENVIROKARE TECH INC
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Envirokare  Tech, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Verbicky,  Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Envirokare  Tech Inc. and will be retained by  Envirokare  Tech Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

August 23, 2004

/s/ John W. Verbicky, Jr.
---------------------------
John W. Verbicky, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
N7027880680008 3
Se

tlalalalstel 7] ]2]2/2]2]2]2/2 a]a]4]4] 4151515] 51515] 51515] 51161 6] 6] 516] 61516] 6171717171717] 717] 7] 718] © TOTAL PRICE | 2. SHIP FROM 3. SHIP TO
3}4/5]6|7/8/9] |5]6/7/8/9]0)112)314] 5/6] 7) 8) 9] 0/1) 2/3] 4} 5/6] 7/8] 9/0) 1/2) 3/415] 6] 7] 8] 9]0 DRMO RBI SAGAMI
BOC IM] JUNTT NTITY = - =
Dent [From [el [ise | s| Seammay fe] G (SM [SES |e GA 6] TM [2161S] |_uumerice_| cours jcrs SH5400 N70278
s E| ADDRESS |@ N | BU 1 | bate] v PINIT] | powtars cts ‘4, MARK FOR
NAVAL COMPUTER AND TELECO
SA51SSES Bx00008 D 15 S9YDAA [000000077] 59 |oo00000620|72 | FAR EAST BLDG 1942
5, DOC DATE 6. NMFC 7.FRTRATE /8. TYPE CARGO 9. PS.
5 § 18069 108140 065 | 79629 U
Ge ————4
3 a = et 10. QTY RECD 11, UP. 72. UNIT WEIGHT |13. UNITCUBE | 14. UFC 15. SL
BEX a
BeBe ae 00000 0000015.23 | 0004.791 |U80250
x 2 eae 76. FREIGHTCLASSIFICATION NOMENCLATURE

ae 17. ITEM NOMENCLATURE

eS PILLOW, ABSORBENT , HA

20. TOTAL WEIGHT 21. TOTAL CUBE

25. NATIONAL,

CEIPT DOCUMENT __ FORM APPROVED OMB NO 070
STOCK NO &
ADD (8-22)

MIN

i

IIA

26. RIC (4-6)
UI (23-24)
QTY {25-29}
CON CODE (71)
DISTR (55-56)
UP (74-80)

aera 18. TY CONT 19.NO CONT
DOUNTAOVILINEMOVWT. eee —

mnt 3

E;

E SSE BX 00008 A 0000000775

a PROJ REC OCN:

E SPI:

PE PO#: DMIL: A HCC: CIIC: U
3 2<HCC MSG: TY CARGO MSG:

q & Cc K SSEA005

q Pl UP MSDS STOCK FUND BIN:

| pT8069/T1I2340 D/C-PK: / / pDSsG: PCN:

BUDS RPGR I|

DTID W813DX80382998 DELIVERY ORDER 2095256441 jcsijcd BY #158

SHIPPING ADDRESS

NAVAL COMPUTER AND TELECOM STATION
FAR EAST BLDG 1942

1 CHOME HONCHO

YOKOSUKA JP

JAPAN

EXCEPTION SHIPPING ADDRESS
DO NOT SHIP
CUSTOMER WILL ARRANGE FOR TRANSPORTATION

97 XXXXXXXX 4930 5CBX 001 600189S4D6 S4D62220 O 000000 6060
011 033189 S4D6

LOC: A0303COMP33A37D0WLL: W803215914

POC:

/ 2018

16.0400



DLA Disposition Services

LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION

| bate Sep 22, 2017 | LOA is valid up to one year from this date.

([] This LOA has additional pages

Per reference DOD 4160.21-M, Chapter 5, the following service members are authorized for direct removal of property
from DLA Disposition Services sites per the Accountable Officer listed below for the following DODAAC(s):

N70278

DODAAC |COMPLETE ADDRESS

N70278 | PSC 473 BOX 3
. | FPO, AP, 96349

N70278 | PSC 473 BOX 3
FPO, AP, 96349

N70278 PSC 473 BOX 3
FPO, AP, 96349

N70278 | PSC 473 BOX 3
FPO, AP, 96349

N70278 | PSC 473 BOX 3
FPO, AP, 96349

1 authorize and verify designees on this page.

FULL NAME [DODAAG [COMPLETE ADDRESS PHONE DIGITAL SIGNATURE

Niet a bane : ee

| Rafael Mendez N70278 | PSC 473 BOX 3 315-243-5438 MEND Digitally signed by
FE FPO, AP, 96349 EZR MENDEZ.RAFAEL.
i AFAEL.118 1187930142

| YY  Date!2017.09.25

| i i 7930142. 17:39:22 +0900"

. EMA

A

ASO EMAIL ADDRRESS |rafael.mendez@fe.navy.mil

COMMANDING OFFICE!

Per regulations, the Commanding Officer cannot be the same person as the Accountable Officer. The CO is the AO’s higher authority.

Digitally signed by

WELSH.MATTHEW. we tsH.MATTHEW.HUNTER.1043

HUN 608106
| MATTHEW H. WELSH, CAPT, USN . TER. 1043608106 Date: 2017.09.25 20:32:50 +09'00'
PFULL'NAME/GRADE j | COMMANDING OFFICER DIGITAL SIGNATURE
R.F. INTERNET SYSTEMS, INC.

                   Susquehanna Street Extension
                      White Haven, PA 18661
                          (570) 443-9575
                       Fax: (570) 443-9237

                       WINBEAM INCORPORATED

                      SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

The undersigned, R.F. Internet Systems, Inc. an affiliate of EMCEE Broadcast
Products, Inc. does hereby subscribe for and agree to take a total of Fifty
Thousand (50,000) shares of the common stock of WinBeam Incorporated, a
Pennsylvania corporation in consideration of Five Dollars ($5.00) per share, the
total purchase price of such stock being $250,000, payment of which shall be
made in good and certified funds.

Dated as of March 24, 2000

                            /s/ Allan J. Harding
                            Allan J. Harding
                            Vice President

The foregoing subscription is
acceptance as ofthe   31st   day
of    March  , 2000, on behalf
of WinBeam, Incorporated

/s/ Terrance B. Michael
Terrance B. Michael President
No. 10-11081.

#### Jeffery Charles Hoagland, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 866, 132 S. Ct. 211,

181 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6501.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-7347.

#### Randall Allen, Petitioner v. Reliance Insurance Company.

562 U.S. 1151, 131 S. Ct. 938,

178 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 423,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

 Page 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3033 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue to apply the 

rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Dependent Spouses to Apply for 

Employment Authorization’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2019 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Ms. LOFGREN, and Mr. KHANNA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue 

to apply the rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Dependent Spouses to Apply for Employment Authorization’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘H–4 Employment Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3033 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CERTAIN 

2 SPOUSES OF H–1B NONIMMIGRANTS. 

3 The Secretary of Homeland Security may not amend 

4 or repeal the rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Depend5 ent Spouses to Apply for Employment Authorization’’ (8 

6 C.F.R. 214, 275), and shall continue to apply such rule 

7 as in effect on May 26, 2015. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-10738.

#### Jefferson A. McGee, Petitioner v. California, et al.

565 U.S. 804, 132 S. Ct. 374,

181 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6782.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.