alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLA Aviation Bearings Division

Contractor’s Declaration 

NSN: P/N: Solicitation #:

PR: 

The Department of Defense is restricted from purchasing foreign ball and roller bearings by the Defense 

Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 225.7009.

A domestic bearing or bearing component is defined as that which has been manufactured in the U.S., 

its outlying areas, or Canada, and for which the cost of the bearing components (bearing element, 

retainer, inner race, and outer race) manufactured in the US, its outlying areas, or Canada exceeds 50% 

of the total cost of the bearing components of that ball and roller bearing. 

As the offering contractor, you are required to declare the information below in reference to the material 

being offered. Failure to provide this information may result in your quote not being considered for 

award. If you are not the manufacturer of the material, you must obtain this information from the 

manufacturing source. Please fill in the blanks and sign and date this document in the spaces below and 

return to the buyer. 

(1) The manufacturing location of the item being procured is: _________________________,

(2) The percentage of the total cost of the bearing components (bearing element, retainer, inner race,

and outer race) that were manufactured in the US, its outlying areas or Canada is: __________.

If you have questions regarding this DFARS restriction, please call or email the Foreign Bearings Project Lead, 

Donna Harris, at (804) 279-3857 or Donna.Harris@dla.mil.

______________________________________________ 

Contractor Name Date 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DLA AVIATION 

6090 STRATHMORE ROAD 

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23237

IN REPLY

REFER TO
# C_2015363EN.01001301.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia

(Case C-151/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 51 TFEU - Connection with the exercise of official authority))

(2015/C 363/15)

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: D. Pelše, I. Kalniņš and K. Freimanis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: M. Tátrai and M. Fehér, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Republic of Latvia failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Republic of Latvia failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders Hungary to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Fire Barrier Penetration Seals in Nuclear Power Plants; 
Availability of Draft NUREG-1552, Supp. 1

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the 
availability of Draft NUREG-1552, Supplement 1, ``Fire Barrier 
Penetration Seals in Nuclear Power Plants,'' dated June 1998, for 
public comment. Comments on the previously published NUREG-1552, ``Fire 
Barrier Penetration Seals in Nuclear Power Plants,'' July 1996, are 
also being accepted.

DATES: Submit comments by September 11, 1998. Comments received after 
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the 
Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received 
on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: NUREG-1552 and Draft NUREG-1552, Supplement 1 are available 
for inspection and copying for a fee at the NRC Public Document Room, 
2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC 20038. A free single 
copy of Draft NUREG-1552, Supplement 1, to the extent of supply, may be 
requested by writing to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Printing 
and Graphics Branch, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Bajwa, Plant Systems Branch, 
Division of Systems Safety and Analysis, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001. Telephone: 301-415-1237

Electronic Access

    Draft NUREG-1552, Supplement 1, is also available electronically by 
visiting NRC's Home Page (http://www.nrc.gov).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of July, 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gary Holahan,
Director, Division of Systems Safety and Analysis, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-18549 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.
1350):

      I, Thomas D. Karol, Chief Executive Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my
knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003,
            which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
            period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            ElkCorp.

Date: September 26, 2003
                                          By /s/ Thomas D. Karol
                                             ---------------------------
                                                 Thomas D. Karol
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
Resulta que no hay nada de frescor 

ni de menta en los infartos causados 

por fumar cigarrillos mentolados.

Noel S., 42 años, Nueva York

Noel fumaba cigarrillos mentolados. No se daba cuenta de que, a pesar de su 

sensación refrescante, los cigarrillos mentolados son tan perjudiciales como los 

demás. Por fumar, Noel sufrió un infarto con solo 36 años de edad.

Usted puede dejar de fumar. 

Para obtener ayuda gratuita, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA

Escanee para obtener 

recursos gratuitos que le 

ayuden a dejar de fumar. Creado por los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Phase I Trial: Autologous, Tumor-pulsed Dendritic Cells.
    Date: August 3-4, 1998.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Martin H. Goldrosen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Room 635C, Rockville, MD 20852-
7408, (301) 496-7930.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-18926 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6573

JAMES C. MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH JONES; SERGEANT MCCOY; R. SMITH,

Officer; OFFICER JOHNSON; THOMAS AKER,

Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-252)

Submitted: June 11, 2003 Decided: June 26, 2003

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. John Payne Scherer, II,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See McNeill v. Jones, No. CA02-252 (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 25, 2003 & entered Mar. 27, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-441.

#### Janice R., Petitioner v. Debra H.

562 U.S. 1136, 131 S. Ct. 908,

178 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 105.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 14 N.Y.3d 576, 904 N.Y.S.2d 263, 930 N.E.2d 184.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46391

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LANCE MOLYNEUX,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: April 24, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Nancy Baskin, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years for possession of a controlled 

substance, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Lance Molyneux pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. Idaho Code § 37-

2732(c). The district court sentenced Molyneux to a unified term of seven years with two years 

determinate. Molyneux appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing 

an excessive sentence and by declining to retain jurisdiction.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Molyneux’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James G. Conroy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Claires Stores, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|             |  |                                   
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|May 15, 2012 |  | /s/ James G. Conroy               
|             |  | James G. Conroy                   
|             |  | Interim Co-Chief Executive Officer
World TB Day
March 24
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ZUMAR HAMID DUBOSE, aka Zumar DuBose

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2024-1578

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:20-cr-00453-WB, 

Judge Wendy Beetlestone.

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

On March 13, 2023, the court received a notice of appeal signed by Kariem Baseer DuBose, appealing the district court’s judgment in the underlying criminal case, ECF 

No. 1-2 at 1, though the notice of appeal was mailed by 

Zumar DuBose, another defendant in the case. Id. at 2. 

This is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not 

include jurisdiction over criminal cases. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1295. The appropriate court for this appeal is the United 

Case: 24-1578 Document: 2 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024
2 US v. DUBOSE

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 41, 1291. It is unclear whether Kariem or Zumar intended to appeal his respective criminal conviction, and

although Mssrs. DuBose have appeals currently pending at 

the Third Circuit, it is unclear whether those appeals are 

the same as this appeal. The court, therefore, will transfer 

this case to the Third Circuit.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal and all filings are transferred to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

April 11, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

Case: 24-1578 Document: 2 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024
No. 10-10494.

#### Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. Travelers, et al.

565 U.S. 838, 132 S. Ct. 147,

181 L. Ed. 2d 64,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6474,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00345

- CR

JOSE ANTONIO TORRES FLAMENCO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 3019

- 11

- J

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 29, 2014
No. 10-11002.

#### Jesse Charles Adams, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 201,

181 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6079.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 407.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 11, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 11, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0270. QUINCY JOHN DIBENARDO v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16M0307ADM
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37874-37875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Open Meeting of the Board of Advisors to the Superintendent; 
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Board of Advisors to the 
Superintendent, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California will 
meet pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 USC App. 2). All sessions will be open to the 
public.

DATES: The meetings will be held on Monday, July 27, 1998 from 8:30 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and on Tuesday, July 28, 1998 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held in Hermann Hall (Building 220) at 
the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, Monterey, California, 93943-5000, telephone (408) 656-2514.


[[Page 37875]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the 
advice of the board on the Navy's Postgraduate Education Program. The 
board examines the effectiveness with which the Naval Postgraduate 
School is accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board will 
inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical equipment; 
administration; state of morale of the student body, faculty, and 
staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to the operation 
of the Naval Postgraduate School as the board considers pertinent.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Lou Rae Langevin,
Lt, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18701 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3814-FF-P
**Attachment**

**Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 21-02 Meeting (October 27, 2021)**

**Current as of November 22, 2021**

SPRC 21-02 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/Archives/supply/ 

Page **4** of **5**
Eric J. Pygi Deputy General Counsel Department ofEnergy Washington, D.C. 20585 

# u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division

WILLIAMJ. BAER Assistant Attorney General

Main Justice Building 950 PennsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 (202) 514-2401 / (202) 616-2645 (Fax) August 16,2014

Re: Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standards

DearDeputyGeneral Counsel Pygi:

I am responding to your June 11, 2014 letter seeking the views ofthe Attorney General about the potential impact on competition ofproposed energy conservation standards for commercial clothes washers. Yourrequest was submitted under Section 325(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) ofthe Energy Policy and Consen(ation Act, as amended (ECPA), 42 U.S.C. 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(V), which requires the Attorney General to make a determination ofthe impact ofany lessening ofcompetition that is likelyto result from the imposition ofproposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's responsibility for responding to requests from other departments about the effect ofa program on competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division in 28 CPR 

### § OAO(g).

Inconducting its analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice, byplacing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, or by inducing avoidable inefficiencies in production or distribution ofparticularproducts. A lessening ofcompetition could result in higher prices to manufacturers and consumers.We have reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (79 Fed. Reg. 12302, March 4,2014) (NOPR). We have also reviewed supplementary information submitted to the Attorney General bythe Department of Energy. Based onthis review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy conservation standards for commercial clothes washers are unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on competition.

Sincerely,

# ~Bae~~

Enclosure
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                              (MAZARS LETTERHEAD)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement of Elscint Ltd. on Form S-8 (relating to the registration of shares to
be used under the Elscint Ltd. 2041 Incentive Plan to Employees and Officers and
the Elscint Ltd. 2003 Incentive Plan to Employees and Officers, File Number
333-111519) of our report dated March 21, 2005 relating to the financial
statements of B.E.A. Hotels N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2004, which are
included in Elscint Ltd. Annual Report an Form 20-F filed June 30, 2005.

Amsterdam, June 28, 2005

MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN

/s/ F.D.N. WALTA RA

F.D.N. WALTA RA
**DoD 4000.25-8-M**

**11 MARCH 1997**

DLM 4000.25, Volume 6, June 5, 2012

**APPENDIX 2.7**

## 

**ADDITION/REVISION TO MAPAD FOR FMS**

**(MA1, MA2)**

2

**AP2.1-**

AP2.7-1

APPENDIX 2.7
No. 10-10928.

#### Vernon Tolbert, Petitioner v. Donald Gaetz, Warden.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 191,

181 L. Ed. 2d 99,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6028.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### *Block, Petitioner, v. City of Gold Bar, Respondent,*

No. 92220-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71425-2-I, June 22, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 262. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
No. 10-10767.

#### LeRoy Jeffers, Petitioner v. Minnesota.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 169,

181 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6331.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.