alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.46-1 APPENDIX 3.46

AP3.46. APPENDIX 3.46

SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT MODIFIER

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DYD.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point to 

which the transaction is being forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item required.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item required.

Quantity 25-29 Enter new quantity when quantity required is 

changed; otherwise, enter quantity from the 

source document.1

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from source document.

Suffix 44 Perpetuate from source document.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Enter new address, when applicable; 

otherwise, perpetuate from source 

document.

Multiuse 51-56 Perpetuate from source document.

Project 57-59 Enter new project code, when applicable; 

otherwise, perpetuate from source

document.

Coast Designation 60 Enter new coast designation when 

applicable; otherwise, perpetuate from 

source document.

Blank 61 Leave blank.

Date Indicator 

(Support)

62-64 Enter new support date when applicable 

(last digit of the calendar year and 2-digit 

month signifying the support date); 

otherwise, perpetuate from source 

document.2

1 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.1.

2 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.4.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.46-2 APPENDIX 3.46

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Advice Code 65-66 Perpetuate from source document.

Routing Identifier 

(FROM)

67-69 Enter new RIC of the activity submitting the 

transaction, if applicable; otherwise, 

perpetuate from source document.

Purpose 70 Perpetuate from source document.

Supply Condition 71 Perpetuate from source document.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which the transaction is prepared.

Generic Submission 76 Perpetuate from source document.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank.
EXHIBIT 31.A
CERTIFICATION
I, John W. Somerhalder II, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of El Paso NaturalGas Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2005                                                        /s/ John W. Somerhalder II   John W. Somerhalder II   Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.1

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(In thousands)

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges





|                                                            |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                                            |  | 2008 |         | 2007 |   | 2006    |  | 2005 |        | 2004
|                                                            |  |      |         |      |  
|Income from continuing    operations before    income taxes |  | $    | 140,455 |      | $ | 110,480 |  | $    | 70,386 |      | $ | 64,136 |  | $ | 38,935
|                                                            |  |      |         |      |  
|Fixed charges1                                              |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Interest expense                                            |  |      | 29,922  |      |   | 35,299  |  |      | 21,288 |      |   | 18,157 |  |   | 17,330
|Amortization of debt    issuance cost                       |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      | 172    |      |   | 56     |  |   | 56    
|Interest included in    rental expense                      |  |      | 5,211   |      |   | 4,134   |  |      | 3,089  |      |   | 2,734  |  |   | 2,465 
|                                                           
|                                                            |  |      |         |      |  
|Total                                                       |  | $    | 35,133  |      | $ | 39,433  |  | $    | 24,549 |      | $ | 20,947 |  | $ | 19,851
|                                                            |  |      |         |      |  
|Earnings2                                                   |  | $    | 175,588 |      | $ | 149,913 |  | $    | 94,935 |      | $ | 85,083 |  | $ | 58,786
|                                                            |  |      |         |      |  
|Ratio of earnings available to coverfixed charges           |  |      | 5.0     |      |   | 3.8     |  |      | 3.9    |      |   | 4.1    |  |   | 3.0   



|1 | Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt issuance cost plus that portion of lease rental expense
representative of the interest factor.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 1982 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 1853CF

_____________________________
W ILLARD L EO M C B RIDE , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County

. Scott Cu pp , Judge.

May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

STARGEL
, NARDELLA and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Sharon M. Vollrath, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DI SPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
No. 11-5198.

#### T. A. P., Petitioner v. Alabama.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 281,

181 L. Ed. 2d 167,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5730.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 72 So. 3d 707.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18850]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Regular Board Meeting, of the Board of 
Directors

TIME & DATE: 2:00 P.M., Friday, July 24, 1998.

PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 
800, Board Room, Washington, DC 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary 202/376-2441.

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes: May 29, 1998 20th Annual Meeting
III. Budget Committee Report July 20, 1998 Meeting
    a. Proposed FY 1998 Budget Reallocation
    b. Proposed FY 1999 Budget Request
    c. Proposed FY 2000 Budget Submission to OMB
IV. Treasurer's Report
V. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report
VI. Adjourn
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18850 Filed 7-10-98; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1126 CA 13-00233 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PABLO DEJESUS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDREA W. EVANS, CHAIRWOMAN, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JONATHAN D. HITSOUS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered May 23, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Inasmuch as petitioner has been released to parole supervision, his appeal from the judgment denying his CPLR article 78 petition seeking release to parole has been rendered moot ( see People ex rel. Baron v New York State Dept. of Corrections , 94 AD3d 1410, 1410, lv denied 19 NY3d 807; People ex rel. Graham v Fischer , 70 AD3d 1381, 1381-1382; People ex rel. Mitchell v Unger , 63 AD3d 1591, 1591), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply herein ( see Baron , 94 AD3d at 1410; Graham , 70 AD3d at 1381-1382; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne , 50 NY2d 707, 714-715).

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
No. 10-10919.

#### Milo A. Rose, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6359.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1224.
No. 11-5433.

#### Van James Bond Tran, Petitioner v. Newport News Holding Corporation.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 89,

181 L. Ed. 2d 19,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6735.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 10-11069.

#### Johnny R. Burnette, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 210,

181 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7002.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 795.
No. 11M9.

#### Anthony Ross Black, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al. (two judgments).

565 U.S. 808, 132 S. Ct. 78,

181 L. Ed. 2d 10,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6904.

October 3, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Larry Edwards, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-K of Reliability Incorporated;
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | This annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reliability Incorporated.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                           
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2004 |  | /s/ Larry Edwards                                                         
|                     |  |                                                                           
|                     |  | Larry Edwards Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reliability Incorporated and will be retained by Reliability Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These Certifications shall not be deemed to be filed or part of the Report or
incorporated by reference into any of the registrants filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filing to the Report.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 April 19, 2007
    /s/ Ira D. KaplanIra D. KaplanChief Financial Officer
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0735**  Docket Number
**20 13**  **- SW**  **- 014**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Bell Alert Se rvice Bulletin No. 204B - 12 - 68, dated October 10, 2012 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TOTARAM SAHADEO and PHULMATTI SAHADEO
, Appellant s ,

v.

E & Y ASSETS, LLC
, and HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 1507

[ April 5, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2014

- CA

002586 (H3)

.

John Spittler, Jr., of Spittler & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

A. Max Zaretsky of Zaretsky Law Group, West Palm Beach, for appellee

E & Y Assets.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, C ONNER and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 10-634.

#### Billy Ray Tratree, Petitioner v. BP North America Pipelines, Inc.

562 U.S. 1139, 131 S. Ct. 944,

178 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 454.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 386.
No. 10-10740.

#### Daniel Jon Peterka, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 847, 132 S. Ct. 166,

181 L. Ed. 2d 79,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6272,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 56 So. 3d 767.
No. 11-5442.

#### Terrell Robey, Petitioner v. Keith Butts, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 312,

181 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6023.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
LESO Equipment National Stock Numbers Actually Returned

Tracked Armored 

Personnel Carriers 

2350000566808, 

2350008602349, 

2350010451123, 

2350010684077, 

2350010684089, 

2350010696931

126

Bayonets

1095000179701, 

1095000739238, 

1095003172460, 

1095007162787, 

1095009132602, 

1095012271739, 

1095015063424, 

1095015216087 

1623

Grenade Launchers 1010006911382 138

Executive Order 13688 Recalled Property
No. 11-5336.

#### Lavelle W. Searcy, Petitioner v. Officer Culhane, et al.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 298,

181 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5761.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6412.

#### Elmer L. O’Connell, Petitioner v. Jeffrey Uttecht, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 859,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 630.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 531, 178 L. Ed. 2d 391, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8500.
Exhibit No. 32.1



Form 10-K

Synthetic Blood International, Inc.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Nicora, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 13, 2004



/S/ Robert NicoraChief Executive Officer




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 13, 2004





/S/ David JohnsonChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 310 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. LEVIN of California, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, 

Mr. KILMER, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SMITH of Washington, 

Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. ESHOO, and Ms. BONAMICI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Ocean Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 310 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE 

2 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF THE COAST 

3 OF CALIFORNIA, OREGON, AND WASHINGTON. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil or natural gas in any area of the outer Continental 

13 Shelf off the coast of the State of California, Oregon, or 

14 Washington.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS