alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38544-38545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19137]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-6123-5]


Delegation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants for Source Categories; State of Arizona; Arizona Department 
of Environmental Quality

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA), 
the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) requested 
delegation of specific national emission standards for hazardous air 
pollutants (NESHAPs). In the Rules section of this Federal Register, 
EPA is granting ADEQ the authority to implement and enforce specified 
NESHAPs. The direct final rule also explains the procedure for future 
delegation of NESHAPs to ADEQ. EPA is taking direct final action 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If 
no relevant adverse comments are received in response to the direct 
final rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this 
proposed rule. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct 
final rule will not take effect and all public comments received will 
be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. 
The EPA

[[Page 38545]]

will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
August 17, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to: 
Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    Copies of the submitted requests are available for public 
inspection at EPA's Region IX office during normal business hours 
(docket number A-96-25).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), 
Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415) 744-
1200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This document concerns delegation of unchanged NESHAPs to the 
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. For further information, 
please see the information provided in the direct final action which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 
112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 7412.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
David P. Howekamp,
Director, Air Division,
Region IX.
[FR Doc. 98-19137 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0875-20

JACKIE LETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE AUSTIN COURT OF APPEALS

BURNET COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J.,

joined.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of seventeen counts of sexual assault of a child.

Punishment was assessed at fifteen years confinement on Count 1 and fifteen years

confinement on Count 17. As to Counts 2 through 16, punishment was assessed at ten
JACKIE LETT - 2

years confinement on each count, the sentences were suspended and appellant was placed

on community supervision for ten years on each count. In the bill of costs, the trial court

assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee. See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE § 133.103. On

appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as being unconstitutional. Lett v.

State, No. 03-19-00105-CR (Tex. App. – Austin August 13, 2020).

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review arguing that the time

payment fee was prematurely assessed. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v.

State, Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim.

App. Mar. 31, 2021), in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed

prematurely because the pendency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs.

Accordingly, we grant ground one of the State’s petition for discretionary review,

vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of

Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s other grounds are

refused.

DATE DELIVERED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

THOMAS C. VAUGHAN, DOC #551837, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3687

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 7, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine 

Thomas, Judge. 

LaROSE, Judge.

We affirm the postconviction court's order granting in part and denying in 

part Thomas Vaughan's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). 

We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener's error. The judgments in case 

numbers 02-CF-8680, 8681, 8682, 8857, 8916, and 8917 should reflect that Mr. 

Vaughan was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions. 

VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Sources: CDC Data & Statistics on ASD, The Place for Children with Autism

B-F2116E (2/23) ©2023 Magellan Health, Inc.

April is Autism Acceptance Month

From autism awareness 

to autism acceptance

While Autism Awareness Month helped us understand autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a 

developmental disability caused by differences in the brain, Autism Acceptance Month facilitates 

support for people living with ASD. An ASD diagnosis can be the cause of mild to significant 

challenges with behavior, communication and learning. 

Accepting and appreciating each other’s differences contributes to positive change for children and adults who have 

ASD, and their families. In the U.S.:

1 in 44 children 

is diagnosed with ASD

2% of adults 

are estimated to have ASD

How can you practice acceptance?

• Understand the symptoms of ASD. When you recognize them in someone, make them feel comfortable. 

Some people may avoid direct eye contact because it makes them uncomfortable. Be aware and adapt your 

communication style without making it a big deal.

• Educate others about ASD. Share information with those closest to you. When you see a situation involving 

microaggression or other discriminatory behavior, use it as a teaching moment to model a better way to handle 

the situation.

• Focus on the positive. People with ASD have many positive traits such as honesty, passion for specific topics, 

creativity and a strong sense of justice.

Accepting people with ASD opens the door to new opportunities, makes the community more inclusive and changes 

how we support people with ASD at home, school and in the community. 

For more information and helpful resources, contact your Employee Assistance Program at

1-866-580-9046 (TTY 711) or go online to MagellanAscend.com.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2847 

To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family member of 

a member of the Armed Forces who is in a hospital or medical facility 

abroad, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2019 

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. CONNOLLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family 

member of a member of the Armed Forces who is in 

a hospital or medical facility abroad, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Passport Fees for 

5 Heroes’ Families Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2847 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PASSPORT FEES FOR CERTAIN INDIVID2 UALS. 

3 Section 1 of the Passport Act of June 4, 1920 (22 

4 U.S.C. 214) is amended, in the third sentence, by insert5 ing ‘‘from a husband, wife, domestic partner, child, par6 ent, grandparent, brother, or sister of a member of the 

7 Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit such member in 

8 a hospital or other medical facility;’’ after ‘‘funeral or me9 morial service for such member;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-7197.

#### Clive F. Wilson, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 925,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 260.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 419.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending November 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samson Bitensky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Samson Bitensky
    --------------------------

Samson Bitensky
Chief Executive Officer
February 27, 2004
No. 11-5612.

#### Pierre McCall, Petitioner v. Carmen Palmer, Warden.

565 U.S. 916, 132 S. Ct. 333,

181 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6195.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5153.

#### Daryl Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 892, 132 S. Ct. 274,

181 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5729.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 627 F.3d 1068.
No. 11M25.

#### Ronnie R. Charleston, Petitioner v. Tony Parker, Warden.

565 U.S. 808, 132 S. Ct. 81,

181 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6927.

October 3, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 10-10882.

#### Paul Bernall, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 855, 132 S. Ct. 185,

181 L. Ed. 2d 94,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6001.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 865.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0494

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID ALAN SPAGNOLO,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until January 29, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 28 2020

12/28/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0494
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                              Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TITAN CORPORATION


                                                                                 State of Incorporation
             Name                                                                       or Jurisdiction
             ----                                                                       ---------------
             <S>                                                                 <C>
             Eldyne, Inc. .................................................                  California
             Unidyne Corporation...........................................                    Virginia
             Diversified Control Systems, Inc. ............................                    Delaware
             Federal Services, Inc. .......................................                  California
             Pulse Sciences, Inc. .........................................                  California
             Titan Environmental Corporation...............................                    Delaware
             Linkabit Wireless, Inc. ......................................                    Delaware
             Linkabit Wireless Limited.....................................              Cayman Islands
             Titan Wireless, Inc. .........................................                    Delaware
             Titan Aerochem, Inc. .........................................                    Delaware
             TomoTherapeutics, Inc.........................................                    Delaware
             Titan Broadband Communications Corporation....................                    Delaware
             Titan Software Systems Corporation............................                    Delaware
             Titan Technologies and Information Systems Corporation........                    Delaware
             DBA Systems, Inc. ............................................                    Delaware
             Titan Scan Corp. .............................................                    Delaware
             Validity Corporation..........................................                  California
             Horizons Technology, Inc. ....................................                    Delaware
             Delfin Systems................................................                  California
             VisiCom Laboratories, Inc. ...................................                  California
             Sakon, LLC....................................................                    Delaware
</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3189 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a partnership to 

provide legal services to women veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Ms. WILD (for herself, Ms. MOORE, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. PORTER, Ms. 

SHALALA, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. CASE, Mr. TRONE, Ms. 

HOULAHAN, Mrs. TRAHAN, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. 

COX of California, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. SWALWELL of California, 

Mrs. HAYES, Ms. STEVENS, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, 

Mr. MOULTON, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. GABBARD, Ms. SCANLON, and Ms. 

DEAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a 

partnership to provide legal services to women veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Legal Serv5 ices for Female Veterans Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3189 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PUBLIC-PRI2 VATE PARTNERSHIP ON LEGAL SERVICES 

3 FOR WOMEN VETERANS. 

4 (a) PARTNERSHIP REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

5 Veterans Affairs shall establish a partnership with at least 

6 one nongovernmental organization to provide legal services 

7 to women veterans. 

8 (b) FOCUS.—The focus of the partnership established 

9 under subsection (a) shall be on the 10 highest unmet 

10 needs of women veterans as set forth in the most recently 

11 completed Community Homelessness Assessment, Local 

12 Education and Networking Groups for Veterans 

13 (CHALENG for Veterans) survey. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 42 U.S.C. 9601, 
et seq.

    Notice is hereby given that on, June 8, 1998 a proposed Consent 
Decree (``Decree'') in United States v. Asarco Incorporated, et al., 
Civil Action No. 2:98CVO415B was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the District of Utah. The United States filed this action 
pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and 
Liability Act, as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., to 
recover the past and future response costs incurred at or in connection 
with the Murray Smelter Site in the City of Murray, Utah.
    The proposed Consent Decree resolves claims against: Asarco 
Incorporated; Murray City Corporation; SALS Investors Partnership; Utah 
Transit Authority; Monroc Inc.; TB Warehouse L.L.C.; Timothy Buehner; 
Paul Buehner; Alma Utah Company, Otto Buehner and Company; Buehner Salt 
Lake Properties,. L.C.; Buehner Corp.; Hi-Ute Investment Company; 
Murray Land Trust L.C.; W.R. White Company; Ash Grove Cement; and 
Paragon Properties. This proposed Consent Decree recovers response 
costs of $109,547.37, and requires Asarco, and the other settling 
defendants, to implement EPA's selected remedy for the Site. The Decree 
also settles potential claims against the United States at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. 
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of the 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to, United States v. Asarco 
Incorporated, et al., Civil Action No. 2: 98CVO415B, and D.J. Ref. #90-
11-3-1729.
    The Decree may be examined at the United States Department of 
Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Denver Field 
Office, 999 18th Street, North Tower Suite 945, Denver, Colorado, 80202 
and the U.S.; EPA Region VIII, 999 18<SUP>th</SUP> Street, Superfund 
Records Center, Suite 500, Denver, Co. 80202, and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 
624-0892. A copy of the Decree may be obtained in person or by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in 
the amount of $32.00 for the Decree, without attachments (25 cents per 
page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources, Division.
[FR Doc. 98-17011 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                                                                  
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | 
|May 11, 2005 |  |  |  | /S/    KENNETH S.
ORD                                                                            
|             |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
No. 10-10965.

#### Justin Terrance Monroe, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 195,

181 L. Ed. 2d 102,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6340.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Fab Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending November 29, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ David A. Miller
    -----------------------
    David A. Miller
    Chief Financial Officer
    March 29, 2004