alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________ No. 95-4258

___________ Traci Kurilla; Steven Bame; * Ann Berkes; Dennis Hogate; * Gladys Burgos; Barb Mertz; * Kathryn Carter; Paul Motzko; * Carl Cavallin; Vanessa Mueller; * Corrine Crider; Eric Osterberg; * Lynda Marie Gates; Starr Paz; * Julie Louise Retzer; Charles * Swanson; Patrick J. Tinjum; * Russell Sobieck; Michelle M. * Steady; Nancy Perchel; Gary * Jenson; Jeff Ohm; Leah * Schwenke; Robert Brown, Jr.; * Appeal from the United States Mike Shablo; Brian Swing, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Appellants, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Fred G. Anderson, Inc.; * * Defendant. * * Diversified Business Credit, * Inc., * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 25, 1996 Filed: November 29, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Traci Kur illa and the other appellants are former employees of Fred G. Anderson, Inc., which ceased operations in February 1995. Appellants sued An derson for their unpaid wages and obtained a default judgment
. Anderson has not appealed.

### The Honorable David S. Doty, United State s District Judge for 1 

### the District of Minnesota. -2- Intheir lawsuit, appellants also sought to recover their unpai d wages from Diversified Business Credit, Inc., Anderson's former lender
. Appellants alleged (1 ) conversion, (2) violation of Minnesota's wage lien statut e, and (3) excessive control and equitable subordination. Th e District Court granted Diversified' s motion to dismiss all of appellants' 1 claims. Appellants appeal only the dismissal of their claim for excessive control and equitable subordination or equitable estoppel. Havingreviewed the case, we conclude that the District Court' s decision is correct. No error of law appears, and an opinion by this Cour t on the questions of state law that the case presents would lac k precedential value. We therefore affirm the dec ision of District Court on the basis of that court's well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

 Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and  results of operations. 

 October 30, 2003 

/s/ Zhang Lebing   Zhang Lebing, Chief Executive Officer 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3126 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3126

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include publication of 
 written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2019

Mr. DeSaulnier introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include publication of 
 written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving Local News Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF WRITTEN NEWS ARTICLES AS TAX-EXEMPT PURPOSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``or for the publication (including 
electronic publication) of written news articles,'' after ``animals,''.
    (b) Income From Advertising Not Unrelated Business Taxable 
Income.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Special rule applicable to news organizations 
        described in section 501(c)(3).--In the case of an organization 
        described in section 501(c)(3) by reason of publication of 
        written news articles, the term `unrelated business taxable 
        income' does not include any amount attributable to payments 
        for advertisements in news publications.''.
    (c) Expedited Application.--Section 508 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(g) Timing for Approval of Applications by News Organizations.--
In the case of an organization described in section 501(c)(3) by reason 
of publication of written news articles, the Secretary shall approve or 
deny such organization for recognition of 501(c)(3) status not later 
than the date that is 12 months after notice is given under subsection 
(a).''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37438-37439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2854]


The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; DSP-83, Non-transfer 
and Use Certificate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.

    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.

[[Page 37439]]

    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Non-Transfer and Use Certificate.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-83.
    Respondents: Exporters of significant military equipment and 
foreign end-users.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,250 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.
FOR FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting documents 
may be obtained from Charles S. Cunningham, Directives Management 
Branch, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. 
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this 
proposal. Comments should refer to the proposed survey by name and/or 
OMB Control Number and should be sent to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, 
(202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18328 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37100-37101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-77-000]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective July 1, 
1998.

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 400
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 401


[[Page 37101]]


    Equitrans states that this filing is made to update Equitrans index 
of customers. In Order No. 581 the Commission established a revised 
format for the Index of Customers to be included in the tariffs of 
interstate pipelines and required the pipelines to update the index on 
a quarterly basis to reflect changes in contract activity. Equitrans 
requests a waiver of the Commission's notice requirements to permit the 
tariff sheets to take effect on July 1, 1998, the first calendar 
quarter, in accordance with Order No. 581.
    Equitrans states that a copy of its filing has been served upon its 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18183 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-5: OTS No. 5194]


Heritage Federal Savings and Loan Association, Laurens, South 
Carolina; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 16, 1998, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Heritage Federal Savings and Loan Association, Laurens, South Carolina, 
to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the 
Southeast Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 Peachtree 
Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30309.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1896 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[DESCRIPTION]	ART. 5 FDS FOR YEAR END 10-K

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FEDERATED PURCHASER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>	1


       
<S>				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             	YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         	Oct-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>            	Nov-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>             	Oct-31-1997
<CASH>                        	     69,358
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                	    400,862
<ALLOWANCES>                  	     16,803
<INVENTORY>                  	    228,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             	    783,629
<PP&E>                       	    147,287
<DEPRECIATION>                	    126,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               	  1,001,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        	    508,794
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                            171,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                   	    296,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	  1,001,175
<SALES>                      	  3,252,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              	  3,288,339
<CGS>                        	  2,493,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                	  2,493,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,066,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>               	  (280,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                          1,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           	  (281,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                  	  (281,901)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.17)





</TABLE>
No. 10-10796.

#### Martez Lamont Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 173,

181 L. Ed. 2d 85,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5956.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 938.
No. 11-5375.

#### Edward Roy Newsome, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 904, 132 S. Ct. 303,

181 L. Ed. 2d 185,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5812.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FEDERATED PURCHASER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>	1


       
<S>				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             	YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         	Oct-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>            	Nov-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>             	Oct-31-1996
<CASH>                        	     95,918
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                	    519,624
<ALLOWANCES>                  	     26,339
<INVENTORY>                  	    314,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             	    970,950
<PP&E>                       	    147,287
<DEPRECIATION>                	    115,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               	  1,287,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        	    480,336
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                            171,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                   	    639,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	  1,287,324
<SALES>                      	  3,980,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              	  3,980,560
<CGS>                        	  3,128,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                	  4,390,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    410,023
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>               	  (412,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (1,975)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           	  (414,826)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                  	  (414,826)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.26)
No. 10-5972.

#### Paul Blackmer, Petitioner v. Dwayne Sweat, et al.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 987,

178 L. Ed. 2d 815,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 274.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 421, 178 L. Ed. 2d 328, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8275.
No. 11-5338.

#### Kiki Washington, Petitioner v. Dwight Neven, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 299,

181 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5711.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5202.

#### Jason Lopez, Petitioner v. Daniel Martuscello, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 895, 132 S. Ct. 281,

181 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5481.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 11-5422.

No. 11-5426.

#### Roberto Lara Olaya, Petitioner v. United States. Nery Campaz-Guerrero, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 906, 132 S. Ct. 309,

181 L. Ed. 2d 189,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5796.

October 3, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 424 Fed. Appx. 898.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


         Below is a list of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of Claire's
Stores, Inc., a Florida corporation, and the corresponding jurisdictions of
organization.

NAME OF ENTITY                                     JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
--------------                                     ----------------------------

Afterthoughts Merchandising Corp.                  Delaware
BMS Distributing Corp.                             Delaware
CBI Distributing Corp                              Delaware
Claire's Austria GmbH                              Austria
Claire's Boutiques, Inc.                           Delaware
Claire's Canada Corp.                              Delaware
Claire's France S.A.S.                             France
Claire's Germany GmbH                              Germany
Claire's Holding GmbH                              Switzerland
Claire's International Europe                      Switzerland
Claire's Nippon, Ltd.                              Japan
Claire's Puerto Rico Corp.                         Delaware
Claire's Stores Canada Corp.                       Canada
Claire's Switzerland GmbH                          Switzerland
Claires Accessories UK, Ltd.                       United Kingdom
Claire's Accessories UK, Ltd. French Branch        France
Claire's Accessories UK, Ltd. Irish Branch         Ireland
CSC Limited Partnership                            Alberta
CSI Luxembourg S.a.r.l.                            Luxembourg
CSI Luxumbourg S.a.r.l. Swiss Branch               Switzerland
Femina Hgmbh Co Kg                                 Austria
Femina Hgmbh                                       Austria
RSI International, Ltd.                            Hong Kong
Sassy Doo!, Inc.                                   Delaware
Sharp of Florida                                   New York
Claire's Accessories Spain, S.L.                   Spain
BMS Fashion Corp.                                  Cayman Islands
# C_2015107EN.01002602.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2015 — Klaes v OHIM — Klaes Kunststoffe (Klaes)

(Case T-453/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Klaes - Prior Community figurative mark Klaes - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 107/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Horst Klaes GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany) (represented by: B. Dix, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Klaes Kunststoffe GmbH (Neuenrade, Germany) (represented initially by: J. Schneider, and subsequently by: S. Schweyer, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2013 (Case R 1206/2012-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Horst Klaes GmbH & Co. KG and Klaes Kunststoffe GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Horst Klaes GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Horst Klaes GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | Orders Klaes Kunststoffe GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Klaes Kunststoffe GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

---
No. 10-7337.

#### Dameon Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1096, 131 S. Ct. 807,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9459.

178 L. Ed. 2d 539,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 495.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.60-1 APPENDIX 3.60

AP3.60. APPENDIX 3.60

TRANSACTION HISTORY REQUEST1

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZJ.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the storage activity to which 

the request is being forwarded.

Type of Physical 

Inventory/Transaction 

History

7 Enter the applicable type of physical 

inventory/transaction history code.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of the item for 

the history/balance being requested.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Transaction History 

Timeframe

25-31 Enter data specifying the period timeframe 

for which transaction history is being 

requested. 

(25-28) Enter transaction history start date.

(29-31) Enter the total number of prior days 

transaction history required.

Blank 32-53 Leave blank.

Distribution 54-56 Enter distribution code if stocks are 

segregated and maintained by codes 

reflected in distribution field; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Lot/Segment Number 57-59 Enter the lot/segment number for controlling 

the inventory/reconciliation; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Type of Media 60 Enter the code which identifies the 

transaction history transmission media (see 

appendix AP2.15); otherwise, leave blank.

Blank 61-66 Leave blank.

1 May be used intra-Component or inter-Component when agreed to by the Components involved.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.60-2 APPENDIX 3.60

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Routing Identifier

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the activity from which the 

request is being forwarded.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Enter applicable ownership/purpose code 

for the history/balance requested; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Supply Condition 71 Enter applicable SCC for the history/

balance requested; otherwise, leave blank.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-76 Enter the ordinal date of the calendar year 

on which the transaction is prepared.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank.
No. 11-237.

#### Mark Anthony Lujan, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 256,

181 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6222.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, denied.

Same case below, 419 S.W.3d 407.