alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Advisory Committee on 

Immunization Practices (ACIP)

Summary Report

October 25-26, 2017

Atlanta, Georgia 

During the discussion period for the Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine Session, Dr. John Allen 

from Valneva added to the responses made to a question from ACIP member Dr. Lee who 

inquired as to whether the DoD database includes spouses, children, and associated members 

in the military. The minutes contained a typographical error stating 2% rather than 10% as Dr. 

Allen reported onsite. The following reflects the language in the approved/published minutes, 

the verbatim statement made by Dr. Allen onsite, and a clarifying statement submitted by Dr. 

Allen post-meeting: 

As documented and published: 

John Allen (Valneva) indicated that unpublished data from a study from the DoD in 2015 

showed that 2% of the Air Force dependents are currently receiving JE-VC.

Verbatim from audio onsite: 

Yes, this is John Allen, Valneva. There is unpublished data, a study from the Department of 

Defense in 2015, that 10% of the Air Force Dependents that live in Asia are currently receiving 

JE-VC.

Post-Meeting clarification submitted by Dr. Allen: 

I went to the microphone and commented that 2015 unpublished data from the Air Force 

estimated 9% of the children received the full 2 dose regimen for JE vaccination. Unfortunately, 

the minutes reflect that I commented 2% of the Air Force pediatric population living in Asia were 

vaccinated. Please ask the responsible person to make this correction.

Addendum: Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine Session

This document has been archived for historical purposes. (3/1/2017) 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-2017-10-addendum-508.pdf
# DLA announces Puget’s Lacy as employee of the quarter for first quarter fiscal 2016

/ Published April 5, 2016
PUGET SOUND, Washington, 
Lula A. Lacy, management support assistant for DLA Distribution, was announced as one of the DLA Employees of the Quarter for the 1st Quarter of fiscal 2016.
Through her meticulous attention to detail, Lacy, who works at DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Wash., validated and reviewed more than 18,000 receipt documents against the Materiel Movement Document for accuracy and submitted documents for the file process with no discrepancies. She processed more than 6,000 trigger requisitions and 1,000 DLA Disposition Services documents, eliminating the administrative burden on warehouse personnel and streamlining the process.

Lacy's exceptional contributions to materiel management integrity and materiel receiving processes contributed to warfighter support and mission readiness.  

She was also named DLA Distribution’s Employee of the Quarter for first quarter, fiscal year 2016.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-12-00299-CR

Style: Cregory Thompson

v The State of Texas

Date motion

filed*: October 31, 2013

Type of

motion: Motion to publish opinion

Party filing

motion: State of Texas

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3(e).

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale

Date: July 3, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18944]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Amended Notice of Public Meeting of the Delaware Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission which was to have 
convened on July 23, 1998 has been rescheduled for July 28, 1998. This 
notice was originally published in the Federal Register on July 2, 
1998, vol. 63, no. 124, FR 36212. This notice is change of day only.
    Persons desiring additional information should contact Ki-Taek 
Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-
376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, July 10, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-18944 Filed 7-13-98; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FCA FORMAT**

**FUND CODE TO APPROPRIATION UPDATE RECORD**

104

	APPENDIX 3.5

1
How to Use Bupropion SR video

AUDIO: Music without lyrics playing through the end of the video.

TITLE ARTCARD - TEXT ON SCREEN:

How to Use Bupropion SR to Quit Smoking 

Bupropion SR is available by prescription only.

VISUALS: The title text is in a box. The background is animated with pills and colored dots crossing 

diagonally behind the text box.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Bupropion SR is a pill that can be used for quitting smoking. 

VISUALS: Bottle lid opens, pill rotates out and down to sit in front of the bottle.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Take it exactly as directed by your healthcare provider. 

VISUALS: Doctor shown. An arm moves into the frame from the bottom to reveal the bottle.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Begin using bupropion 1 to 2 weeks before your quit date. 

VISUALS: Quit date circled on a calendar.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Try to take bupropion at the same time every day, 

VISUALS: Reveals 8 AM day dose, sun animates.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Try to take bupropion at the same time every day, with doses separated by at least 8 

hours.

VISUALS: 5 PM night dose swipes in, text animates.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Do not take more than two doses in 24 hours. 

VISUALS: Split panel swipes away, sun and moon come together.

TEXT ON SCREEN: You can take bupropion with or without food.
VISUALS: Various food, beverage, and flatware items make up a background graphic.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Do not crush, chew, or divide the pill.

VISUALS: “Do not crush” appears and mortar and pestle animate, line slashes through; “chew” appears 

and mouth animates, line slashes through; “or divide the pill” appears, pill breaks, line slashes through.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Limit or avoid drinking alcohol while using bupropion. 

VISUALS: Warning icon animates.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Proper use will help you avoid side effects...

VISUALS: Solid background.

TEXT ON SCREEN: and stay quit.

VISUALS: An arm with its hand in a “thumbs up” gesture enters the frame.

TEXT ON SCREEN: 

Talk to your healthcare provider for help using medicines to quit smoking. 

For more help quitting, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW

VISUALS: The text is in a box. The background is animated with pills and colored dots crossing diagonally 

behind the text box.

TEXT ON SCREEN:

This video is a part of a collaboration with the National Cancer Institute’s Smokefree.gov Initiative.

CDC does not endorse any particular organization, product, or service.

VISUALS: Joint logos of the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention.
# Cases by county 2016-2019
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 10, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Killbuck Bancshares, Inc., Killbuck, Ohio; to acquire Commercial 
and Savings Bank, Danville, Ohio.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 13, 1988.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19037 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

d0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144280

TERRY ELLISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144280 COA: 303908 Saginaw CC: 11-011835-AW SAGINAW COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
F. Adair, as Chief Financial Officer of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 10, 2006



By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
No. 10-9437.

#### Timothy James Butler, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 802, 132 S. Ct. 75,

181 L. Ed. 2d 2,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6737.

October 3, 2011.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476, 131 S. Ct. 1229, 179 L. Ed. 2d 196 (2011).

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 259.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                    ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
                                                 Computation of per Share Earnings as
                                                   Disclosed in Item 14 of Form 10-K

                                                    Five years ended June 30, 2002

                                           2002            2001            2000             1999           1998
                                         -------         -------         -------          --------        -------

<S>                                   <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
Computation of earnings
     per share:

         BASIC
         Weighted average
         number of primary
         shares outstanding .....         1,030,556      1,031,403       1,045,520       1,100,065       1,111,220
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

Net income (loss)................        $  545,754      1,033,069         782,943         730,601       (739,602)
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

Per share-basic ................        $      .53            1.00             .75             .66           (.67)
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========
         DILUTED
         Weighted average
         number of primary
         shares outstanding .....         1,034,904      1,033,989       1,045,235       1,100,065       1,111,220
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

         Net effect of
         dilutive stock
         options based on
         treasury stock
         method .................             4,348          2,586             285              --              --
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

Net income (loss) ...............        $  545,754      1,033,069         782,943         730,601       (739,602)
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

Per share-diluted ...............       $      .53            1.00             .75             .66           (.67)
                                        ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========       ==========

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.01 - 6-25-14






Exhibit 10.01


Letter of extension for the Company's credit agreement
Dated June 24, 2014


In accordance with Section 2.21 of the Company's Credit Agreement dated December 13, 2011, Lenders holding Commitments aggregating approximately $684.8 million have approved the extension of the Maturity Date (with respect to their Commitments only) for an additional year until December 13, 2018.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending November 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Miller,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



By: /s/ David A. Miller
    --------------------------

David A. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
February __, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I,Ashutosh Roy, the chief executive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGain Communications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Peneueta, Petitioner,*

No. 92149-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71948-3-1, July 27, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1008. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.333-63515) pertaining to the Stock Compensation Program and 1994
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries
of our report dated May 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2003.


                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                      ---------------------


New York, New York
June 27, 2005
DRMS CONTRACT NUMBER 99-4001-0004

Supplemental Agreement 8

Page 2 of 3

**WHEREAS**, the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service (“DRMS”) desires that property being sold as scrap material receive increased scrutiny to ensure that destructive scrapping is being performed in accordance with the requirements of this sales contract; and

**WHEREAS,**Supplemental Agreement No. 5 of this sale contract, executed on 21 May, 2007, in part required the purchaser to effectively destroy scrap identified as Standard Waste and Scrap Classification (SCL) Codes MUT, MFS and CSI with government personnel performing the certification and verification of the destruction process.

**NOW, THEREFORE,**it is mutually agreed between the two parties hereto to this modification that:

1. Supplemental Agreement No. 5,  part 4 shall be amended as follows:

Subparagraph a shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph:

a. Material will be completely destroyed using a process that will input items up to 8’ (foot) X 8’ (foot) in size and result in residue not to exceed 4” (inches) X 4” (inches) in size or effectively destroy the item to prevent reuse, recognition or reconstruction of the item to the satisfactory of the government appointed verifier. Automated size reduction prior to shredding is allowed.

Following subparagraph h, the following subparagraph i will be inserted:

i. The purchaser will provide personnel to act as and perform the duties of certifier in the destruction process. 

a. Training shall consist of candidates completing the DRMS on-line ABC’s of Demil Course and every other year thereafter.

DRMS CONTRACT NUMBER 99-4001-0004

Supplemental Agreement 8

Page 3 of 3

b. Purchaser shall submit name and address of employees prior to their assuming duties as a certifier. 

c. DRMS will appoint in writing all candidates approved to perform certifier duties.

2. All existing terms and conditions including Supplemental Agreements 1-7 remain in effect.

**//////////NOTHING FOLLOWS//////////**
# C_2015363EN.01001601.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Federación de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones obreras (CC.OO.) v Tyco Integrated Security SL, Tyco Integrated Fire & Security Corporation Servicios SA

(Case C-266/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2003/88/EC - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Point (1) of Article 2 - Concept of ‘working time’ - Workers who are not assigned a fixed or habitual place of work - Time spent travelling between the workers’ homes and the premises of the first and last customers))

(2015/C 363/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Nacional

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Federación de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones obreras (CC.OO.)

Applicant:

Defendants: Tyco Integrated Security SL, Tyco Integrated Fire & Security Corporation Servicios SA

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Point (1) of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, in which workers do not have a fixed or habitual place of work, the time spent by those workers travelling each day between their homes and the premises of the first and last customers designated by their employer constitutes ‘working time’, within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.

1

---
No. D-2480.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Joseph Nathaniel Baron.

562 U.S. 1197, 131 S. Ct. 1066,

178 L. Ed. 2d 880,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 979.

January 24, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 41, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1131, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5606.
**Agenda**

**DoD WebSDR Requirements Meeting**

May 7, 2002  

HQC Conference Room 2905
Motion Granted in Part; Abatement Order filed March 10, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00924-CV

____________

VINCENT ANTHONY MATASSA AND ADAM HENRY ROBISON, 

Appellants

V.

BRIGHTOIL PETROLEUM (USA), INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-37056

ABATEMENT ORDER

The parties have filed a joint motion to postpone the briefing schedule. The 

motion is granted in part. The appeal is abated for 60 days. 

The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket after sixty days. 

Any party may file a motion stating grounds for reinstating the appeal before the 

end of the sixty-day period. Any party may also file a motion to dismiss the appeal 

or other dispositive motion at any time. Any party may file a motion to extend the 
abatement period for completion of mediation or to finalize a settlement. 

PER CURIAM
#### *State, Respondent, v. Alexis, Petitioner,*

No. 92026-5.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71342-6-I, June 8, 2015, 8,2015,188 188 Wn. App. 1007. *Denied*January 6, 2016.