alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013101EN.01001901.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/19

---

Action brought on 16 January 2013 — Senz Technologies/OHIM — Impliva (Umbrellas)

(Case T-22/13)

2013/C 101/41

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Senz Technologies BV (Delft, Netherlands) (represented by: W. Hoyng and C. Zeri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Impliva BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | To annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dated 26 September 2012 in Case R 2453/2010-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

To annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dated 26 September 2012 in Case R 2453/2010-3;

| — | Uphold the arguments put forward before the General Court and declare the registration of the Registered Community Design with no. 000579032-0001 to be valid; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the arguments put forward before the General Court and declare the registration of the Registered Community Design with no. 000579032-0001 to be valid;

| — | Order the Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The trade design ‘Umbrellas’ — Registered Community design No 000579032-0001

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design: Impliva BV

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The application for a declaration of invalidity was based on Articles 4 and 9 Council Regulation No 6/2002

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1) and Articles 6 in connection with 25 (1)(b) of Council Regulation No 6/2002.

Pleas in law:

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2877 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. NEAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. E–3 VISAS FOR IRISH NATIONALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) of the 

5 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or, on a 

7 basis of reciprocity as determined by the Secretary of 

8 State, a national of Ireland,’’ after ‘‘Australia’’. 

9 (b) EMPLOYER REQUIREMENTS.—Section 212 of the 

10 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) is 

11 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2877 IH

1 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (t) 

2 (as added by section 1(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 108– 

3 449 (118 Stat. 3470)) as subsection (u); and 

4 (2) by adding at the end of subsection (t)(1) 

5 (as added by section 402(b)(2) of Public Law 108– 

6 77 (117 Stat. 941)) the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) In the case of an attestation filed with re8 spect to a national of Ireland described in section 

9 101(a)(15)(E)(iii), the employer is, and will remain 

10 during the period of authorized employment of such 

11 Irish national, a participant in good standing in the 

12 E-Verify program described in section 403(a) of the 

13 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Respon14 sibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).’’. 

15 (c) APPLICATION ALLOCATION.—Paragraph (11) of 

16 section 214(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

17 U.S.C. 1184(g)(11)) is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(11)(A) The Secretary of State may approve 

19 initial applications submitted for aliens described in 

20 section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) only as follows: 

21 ‘‘(i) For applicants who are nationals of 

22 the Commonwealth of Australia, not more than 

23 10,500 for a fiscal year. 

24 ‘‘(ii) For applicants who are nationals of 

25 Ireland, not more than a number equal to the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2877 IH

1 difference between 10,500 and the number of 

2 applications approved in the prior fiscal year 

3 for aliens who are nationals of the Common4 wealth of Australia. 

5 ‘‘(B) The approval of an application described 

6 under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be deemed for nu7 merical control purposes to have occurred on Sep8 tember 30 of the prior fiscal year. 

9 ‘‘(C) The numerical limitation under subpara10 graph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens and 

11 not to the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-11100.

#### Guillermo Rivera-Jurado, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 214,

181 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6857.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 323.
# C_2016038EN.01001401.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/14

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino) — Ford Motor Company v Wheeltrims srl

(Case C-500/14) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Designs - Directive 98/71/EC - Article 14 - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 110 - So-called ‘repair’ clause - Use by a third party of a mark, in the absence of the proprietor’s consent, for spare parts or accessories for motor vehicles identical to the goods in relation to which the trade mark is registered)

(2016/C 038/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ford Motor Company

Applicant:

Defendant: Wheeltrims srl

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 14 of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs and Article 110 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs must be interpreted as precluding, by way of derogation to the provisions of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, a manufacturer of spare parts and accessories for motor vehicles, such as hub caps, from affixing to its goods a sign which is identical to a registered trade mark, inter alia for such goods, by a manufacturer of motor vehicles, without the consent of the latter, on the ground that the use which would thus be made of that trade mark constitutes the only means of repairing the vehicle at issue by restoring its original appearance as a complex product.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

1

---
No. 10-11187.

#### Clifford Piphus, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 871, 132 S. Ct. 226,

181 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6997.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.64-1 APPENDIX 3.64

AP3.64. APPENDIX 3.64

LOCATION RECONCILIATION HISTORY 

NOTIFICATION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD 

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS 

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZP.

Routing Identifier Code 

(TO)

4-6 Enter the RIC identifying the 

owner/manager to which the transaction is 

being forwarded.

Type of Location 

Reconciliation Request

7 Enter code from Appendix AP2.23 

identifying Type of Location Reconciliation 

Request.

Number of DIC DZK 

Transactions to be 

Transmitted

8-14 Actual number of DIC DZK requests to be 

transmitted, e.g., 0000151.

Date (Cutoff) 15-18 Enter the date for location reconciliation. 

The last digit of the calendar is entered in 

record position 15 and the day of the year 

is entered in record positions 16-18; e.g., 

2029 is Jan 29, 2002.

Routing Identifier Code 

(FROM)

19-21 Enter the RIC identifying the storage 

activity preparing the transaction.

Type of Media 22 Enter type of media code from Appendix 

AP2.15 identifying medium used to 

transmit the transactions.

Blank 23-80 Leave blank.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 301 

Making appropriations for Federal employees working during the Government 

shutdown beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. GIBBS (for himself, Mr. STIVERS, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. 

TIPTON, Mr. GRIFFITH, and Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making appropriations for Federal employees working during 

the Government shutdown beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Pay for Es5 sential Employees Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF SALARIES OF EXCEPTED GOVERN7 MENT EMPLOYEES. 

8 There are appropriated, out of any money in the 

9 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 301 IH

1 necessary to pay, during the period of a lapse in discre2 tionary appropriations beginning on or about December 

3 22, 2018, the salaries and expenses of any officer or em4 ployee of the Federal Government who is excepted from 

5 the furlough resulting from such lapse. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
LIST OF SUCCESSFUL BIDDER

DATE: 7/24/2015 PAGE: 001

IFB NUMBER: 39-4603

IFB ITEM SALE: KUWAIT METALLIC & NON-METALLIC SCRAP

SCO: WILLIE N. PAYNE

 

BID OPENING DATE: 12/18/2014

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIDDER NAME

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM

NO

U/I ITEM NAME UNIT BID

PRICES

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASAHI GEN TRAD & CONT. CO.

0001 LB SCRAP EXPENDED SHELL CASINGS WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.900

0002 LB SCRAP TIRES & RUBBER RESIDUE WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.027

0003 LB SCRAP VEHICLE RESIDUE WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.012

0004 LB SCRAP ELECTRONICS/PLASTIC/FIBERGLASS 

WITH DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR 

MUTILATION PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.009

0005 LB METALLIC & NON-METALLIC SCRAP WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE USG.

$0.025

0006 LB METALLIC & NON-METALLIC SCRAP VEHICLES 

& VEHICULAR RELATED WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE PURCHASER.

$2.750

0007 LB METALLIC & NON-METALLIC SCRAP NON- VEHICULAR RELATED WITH 

DEMILITARIZATION AND/OR MUTILATION 

PERFORMED BY THE PURCHASER.

$2.530

CUMULATIVE AVERAGE: $14.08
No. 10-10951.

#### Kenneth Dale Gooch, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 194,

181 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6329.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 700.
No. 10-10573.

#### Michael Dearing, Petitioner v. Frank Chavez, Warden.

565 U.S. 841, 132 S. Ct. 152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6205.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 23.
State of Louisiana 

2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS 

Designation Recommendations 

Designated Area Designation 

AQCR 019: Monroe-El Dorado 

Interstate 

Caldwell Parish 

Catahoula Parish 

Concordia Parish 

East Carroll Parish 

Franklin Parish 

Grant Parish 

La Salle Parish 

Madison Parish 

Morehouse Parish 

Ouachita Parish 

Richland Parish 

Tensas Parish 

Union Parish 

West Carroll Parish 

AQCR 022: ShreveportTexarkana-Tyler Interstate 

Avoyelles Parish 

Bienville Parish 

Bossier Parish 

Caddo Parish 

Claiborne Parish 

De Soto Parish 

Jackson Parish 

Lincoln Parish 

Natchitoches Parish 

Rapides Parish 

Red River Parish 

Sabine Parish 

Vernon Parish 

Webster Parish 

Winn Parish 

AQCR 106: S. Louisiana-S.E. 

Texas Interstate 

Acadia Parish 

All en Parish 

U nclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

U nclassifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unc[assifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Designation 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

U nclassifiable 

U nclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Designation 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 
State of Louisiana 

2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS 

Designation Recommendations 

Ascension Parish Unclassifiable 

Assumption Parish Unclassifiable 

Beauregard Parish Unclassifiable 

Calcasieu Parish Attainment 

AQCR 106: S. Lottisiana-S.E. Designation 

Texas Interstate (cont.) 

Cameron Parish 

East Baton Rouge Parish 

East Feliciana Parish 

Evangeline Parish 

Iberia Parish 

Iberville Parish 

Jefferson Davis Parish 

Jefferson Parish 

Lafayette Parish 

Lafourche Parish 

Livingston Parish 

Orleans Parish 

Plaquemines Parish 

Pointe Coupee Parish 

St. Bernard Parish 

St. Charles Parish 

St. Helena Parish 

St. James Parish 

St. John the Baptist Parish 

St. Landry Parish 

St. Martin Parish 

St. Mary Parish 

St. Tammany Parish 

Tangipahoa Parish 

Terrebonne Parish 

Vermilion Parish 

Washington Parish 

West Baton Rouge Parish 

West Feliciana Parish 

U nclassifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unc!assifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

Attainment 

U nclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable 

Unclassifiable 

Attainment 

Unclassifiable
AP5.18 APPENDIX 5.1 8 

DISBURSEMENTlCOLLECTION RECORD 

Data Element Name 

Document Identifier 

SPIIN: CalllOrder 

ACRN 

Numbering: 

Voucher Number 

Numbering: 

Batch Sequence 

Identity Code: 

CPN Recipient 

Identity Code: 

Disbursing Officer 

Voucher Date: 

Year 

Month 

Contract Payment Type 

Country Code 

Numbering: (Original) 

Voucher Number 

Record 

Position(sj 

1 -3 

4-1 6 

17-20 

21 -22 

23-28 

29 

30-35 

36-41 

42-48 

(42-43) 

(44-46) 

(47-48) 

49 

50-5 1 

52-57 

Data Entries 

PV2. 

Must agree with the related PV1 record. 

Must agree with the related PV1 record. 

Must agree with the related PVI record. 

Must agree with the related PV1 record. 

Alphas. I and 0 cannot be used. 

Must be 61 valid DoDAAC. 

Must be a valid Disbursing Symbol. 

Numeric year. 

JAN, FEE!, MAR, APR, MAY, JUN, 

JUL, AUG, SEP, OCT, NOV, DEC. 

Applicable day for the month in rp 44-46. 

A-D, F, H, J-M, Q, R, or Z. 

Alpha. 

Alphanurneric. 
Data Element Name 

Contract Payment 

DeductionlCollection 

(Type of Collection) 

Amount: Gross Amount 

Amount: Net 

PaidlCollected Amount 

Contract Fund Reporting 

Transaction 

Reserved 

Record 

Positionis) Data Entries 

58 D-H, J, N, P-Z, or blank. 

59-68 Numeric. 

69-78 Numeric. 

79 C, when rp 58 contains a code; or D, when rp 

58 is blank. 

80 Blank.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18593]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Satake 
USA Inc., of Modesto, California, an exclusive license to S.N. 07/
550,310-601, ``Machine Vision Apparatus and Method for Sorting 
Objects'' filed October 30, 1995, Patent No. 5,703,784 issued on 
December 30, 1997. Notice of Availability was published in the Federal 
Register on July 18, 1996.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
Room 415, Building 005, BARC-West, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Satake USA Inc., submitted a 
complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective 
exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective 
exclusive license may be granted unless, within sixty (60) days from 
the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service 
receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant 
of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-18593 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
No. 10-1498.

#### Emmanuel Morris, Petitioner v. Virginia.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 115,

181 L. Ed. 2d 39,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5486.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.

Same case below, 281 Va. 70, 705 S.E.2d 503.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6519
ELLIS RICHARD DOUGLAS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGRAHAM SYLVESTER, Officer; BRIAN BACON, Officer; ELFRAM BOWIE, Officer; CARL TROGDON, Officer; MICHAEL VAUGH, Officer; JESSE KNIGHT, Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and CHARLES DAWKINS, Officer, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-940-K) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Ellis Richard Douglas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Charles Verderaime, VERDERAIME & DUBOIS, Baltimore, M aryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Ellis Douglas appeals the jury's verdict for the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) civil action. Douglas, who brought this suit alleging excessive force by several policeofficers when they arrested him, urges overturning the jury's verdict because he alleges that the police officers committed perjuryduring the trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the jury's verdict. Additionally, we deny Douglas's motion to app oint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Da+e!Deciember \^iO»5*"" DEC 23 2015

XD^J-CVD^o:. \%im$

3?72 F.!nA3SO Sou4-U

Re;Cause No:l32225^A-WR-%22*-03 n

S+yfectlN Re:Wiliram Wayward Free,maM,Sr.

CUrK-Por 4W CoorA- of Appeal

RO. Box 12302

A os4iM.Texas 727 H

Dear WVr.. AbeLhcosta, x , ,. Xr» aod»i uon4H^i •qou-'te -Ict:-qo^ Kmouj+hcif X

address hau eouv4 appot'iJkd s^weu,M^oW\e^ A.

u/.U ausuj.er tat) ie44ers CoMcefTul.A/<f Mq UMA-da+a

base ^'.Ktore ,|M4en>re4*hoAi ^4^^^ twyes+.cja^o^ 4V&4 Vie \s-te> have cfo/ue-Yor N\e. J a/w oaaKiM^cjolld^oarc -(Wh "^ (Lour4- W\re, UV -ho See« retW-f -for

^c (Oio w^ Weouies4o k\s dW<ok sW 4pu-,are too<xI

kware. of-fti* .\ ssuepLuMl ivjct add^4Vi^ i-s&oe,

uaurlej •uou.-b^JJouiaJDOoJr^'lU Mattel ^°Vr ^^ •
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-13-00721-CV

Bruce I. Schimmel 

v.

Gary McGregor, Teri McGregor, Kris Hall, Soledad Pineda, Larry Bishop, Cynthia Bishop, 

George Clark, Deborah Clark, and Carol Severance

NO. 2013-05146 IN THE 113TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

E-TXGOV FEE

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$15.00

$10.00

$5.00

$10.00

$5.00

$5.00

$10.00

$5.00

$5.00

$10.00

$5.00

$5.00

$10.00

$644.00

$5.00

$175.00

09/30/2014

07/25/2014

07/24/2014

12/16/2013

11/22/2013

11/04/2013

11/04/2013

10/25/2013

10/23/2013

10/23/2013

10/14/2013

10/10/2013

10/10/2013

09/23/2013

09/23/2013

09/03/2013

08/28/2013

08/28/2013

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

APE

APE

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT
The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$944.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this May 14, 2015.
No. 11-5149.

#### Larry Welenc, Petitioner v. Florida (two judgments).

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 88,

181 L. Ed. 2d 18,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6759.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *19denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.