alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>






                                                                     Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, W. Thomas
Parrington, the Chief Executive Officer and Manuel Artime, the Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and after reasonable inquiry:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                           LODGIAN, INC.

Date: June 30, 2004             By:       /s/  W. THOMAS PARRINGTON
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                               W. THOMAS PARRINGTON
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 30, 2004             By:          /s/  MANUEL ARTIME
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                  MANUEL ARTIME
                                        Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lodgian, Inc. and will
be retained by Lodgian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-11265.

#### Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Petitioner v. Steven Murlak, et al.

565 U.S. 876, 132 S. Ct. 236,

181 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6452,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PocketSpec Technologies Inc. (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Cynthia Kettl, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

JUNE 19, 2004

                                                     By: /s/  Cynthia Kettl
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-10638.

#### Percy Cummings, Petitioner v. Blaine Lafler, Warden.

565 U.S. 842, 132 S. Ct. 155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 70,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6037.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.46. APPENDIX 8.46**

**REQUEST FOR SHIPMENT TRACING ON REGISTERED, INSURED, AND CERTIFIED PARCEL POST**

AP3.46-1

1

APPENDIX 3.46

AP8.46-1

APPENDIX 8.46
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132932 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132932 

 COA: 262671 

Wayne CC: 04-012767-01

WADE N. SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 135O,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PocketSpec Technologies Inc.
the  "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'). I, F. Jeffrey Krupka, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

               (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


           By: /s/  F. Jeffrey Krupka
               ------------------------------------------------
                    F. Jeffrey Krupka,  Chief Executive Officer


           Dated: 6/13/03
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    A meeting of the Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory 
Committee will be held July 28, 1998, 9:00 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 1617M(2), 14th Street between Constitution & 
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, D.C. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with 
respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls 
applicable to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.
    The Committee will meet only in Executive Session to discuss 
matters properly classified under Executive Order 12958, dealing with 
the U.S. export control program and strategic criteria related thereto.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on December 3, 1997, pursuant 
to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
that the series of meetings of the Committee and of any Subcommittee 
thereof, dealing with the classified materials listed in 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(1) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in section 10(a)(1) and (a)(3), of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. The remaining series of meetings or portions thereof 
will be open to the public.
    A copy of the Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions 
of meetings of the Committee is available for public inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. For further 
information, contact Lee Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-19106 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                              Exhibit 18
                                                              ----------


October 14, 1996


To the Board of Directors of Three D Departments, Inc.

Dear Sirs:



We have audited the financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended August 3, 1996 and have issued our report
thereon dated October 14, 1996. Note 2 to the financial statements describes a
change in the method of accounting for certain indirect costs incurred in the
acquisition of merchandise inventories. It should be understood that the
preferability of one acceptable method of accounting for indirect costs incurred
in the acquisition of merchandise inventories over another has not been
addressed in any authoritative accounting literature and in arriving at our
opinion expressed below, we have relied on management's business planning and
judgement. Based upon our discussions with management and the stated reasons for
the change, we believe that such change represents, in your circumstances, the
adoption of a preferable alternative accounting principle for indirect costs
incurred in the acquisition of merchandise inventories in conformity with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.


Yours very truly,




PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
No. 11-5127.

#### James Tyler, Petitioner v. District of Columbia.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 272,

181 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5620.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 10-6.1 

 

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 

EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2003) 

 

AMENDMENT 1 

 

Pursuant to Article X of the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan, as amended (“Plan”), Duke Energy Corporation(“Corporation”) hereby amends the Plan, effective December 31, 2004, in the following respects: 

 

“As part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Section 409A has been added to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Code Section 409Aimposes new requirements upon deferred compensation plans that must be satisfied in order that amounts deferred will not be currently included in taxable income. Code Section 409A, by its terms, does not apply to “amounts deferred” beforeJanuary 1, 2005, and earnings thereon, under a deferred compensation plan that is not “materially modified” after October 3, 2004. 

 

Effective immediately before January 1, 2005, the Plan is divided into two separate deferred compensation plans, one of which shall be named Plan“I” and the other shall be named Plan “II”. Plan I shall include only “amounts deferred” before January 1, 2005, and earnings thereon, and such deferred compensation shall be subject to the provisions of the Plan as ineffect on October 3, 2004, and as Plan I is subsequently amended or otherwise changed, except as would result in such deferred compensation becoming subject to Code Section 409A. 

 

Plan II shall include only “amounts deferred” after December 31, 2004, and earnings thereon, and such deferredcompensation shall be subject to the provisions of the Plan as in effect after December 31, 2004, including subsequent amendments or other changes to Plan II as may be approved by the Duke Energy Director — Executive Compensation & Benefitsfor the purpose of enabling Plan II deferred compensation to satisfy the requirements imposed by Code Section 409A. Such requirements include the following: restrictions as to when a new participant may make an initial deferral election;restrictions as to the earliest date a participant may receive distribution; prohibition against acceleration of distribution; and restrictions on a participant’s ability to make a subsequent election that delays distribution or changes theform of distribution. 

 

This Amendment is intended to result inPlan I deferred compensation not being subject to Code Section 409A and to result in Plan II deferred 

 

compensation satisfying the requirements imposed by Code Section 409A, and this Amendment shall be interpreted and implemented to carry out such intention.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Plan is executed onbehalf of the Corporation this 27 day of October, 2004. 

 

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

By:
 /s/    CHRISTOPHER C.ROLFE        
Its:
 **Vice President**  **Human Resources**
Tobacco companies aggressively 

market to LGBTQ+ communities.

Angie P., age 62, and her wife Catharay

Tobacco companies target members of LGBTQ+ communities with cigarette 

marketing – in stores, magazines, and social media, as well as online and at events. 

Aggressive marketing of their highly addictive products contributed to Angie’s years 

of smoking. She was finally able to quit for good at age 40.

You can quit. 

For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW

Scan for free resources 

to help you quit smoking Developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
No. 10-5624.

#### Stephen Murray Mitchell, Petitioner v. Juan Castillo, Warden.

562 U.S. 1090, 131 S. Ct. 812,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9472.

178 L. Ed. 2d 530,

December 6, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------



                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Samson Bitensky, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of Fab Industries, Inc.; and

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date:  March 29, 2004
                                               By: /s/ Samson Bitensky
                                                   ----------------------------
                                               Name:    Samson Bitensky
                                               Title:   Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason B. Savery, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[769 NYS2d 442]

Appeal from a judgment of Oswego County Court (Hafner, Jr., J.), entered January 3, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see*Penal Law § 70.30 [1] [e] [ii] [B]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
I, Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

         (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 26, 2003
                                        /s/ Thomas ZurSchmiede
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer of Federal Screw Works
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6980
DAVID E. COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-426-5-HC) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David E. Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cooper v. Dodrill , No. CA-00-426-5-HC (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,469<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (206)
<INVENTORY>                                     54,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                       (81,990)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,043
<SALES>                                          1,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,823
<CGS>                                              708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     72
<INCOME-TAX>                                        63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  9
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         9
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<FN>
<F1>Balance includes $951 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 9 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00395

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 25th District Court Colorado County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 24399

MEM O RANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed May 3, 2021

. The notice of appeal was filed July 14, 2021

. To date, our records show that appellant has no t paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying

costs )

. Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).

On August 16, 2021 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate fi ling

fee on or bef

ore Au gust 26, 2021, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order

.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has fa i led to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time)

. 1

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Ch ristopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.

1 We note that t he letter of assignment and th e notice of appe a l state the da te of judgment

w as May 3, 2021 . A ttached to the letter of assignment is a motion for new trial that was timely filed. However, a motion for new trial will not operate to extend the appellate timetable in an accelerated appeal. In the Interes t of K.A.F ., 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005). T he notice of appeal was due May 24, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time ended June 8, 2021

. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 9 5 9 S.W.2d 615, 617

– 18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26); Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed u ntil July 14, 2021

.
No. 10-7929.

#### Butch Ray Dixon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1026,

178 L. Ed. 2d 849,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 707.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 183.
Did you know that some queso fresco can make you sick? 

Protect your family! Always buy queso fresco that is refrigerated and made with pasteurized milk. Always buy queso fresco in the store. 

Also, buy queso fresco that has a label.

Never buy queso fresco from the street! 

 For more information visit: http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/specific-foods/listeria-and-food.html.   

or call: 

http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/specifi
No. 10-1516.

#### Robert M. Haddad, Petitioner v. Jennifer DeCristofaro, et al.

565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5231.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.