alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joseph M. Squeri, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |        |  |                                                                                                  
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |        |  | /s/    Joseph M. Squeri                                                                          
|February 26, 2008 |  | NAME:  |  | Joseph M. Squeri                                                                                 
|                  |  | TITLE: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 24
 
 
 RE:
    
    Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Commission File No. 1-6695
1934 Act Filings on Form 10-K
   Date
    
    
    
    Date/s/ Darrell Webb
    
    April 15, 2010
    
    /s/ Frank Newman
    
    April 15, 2010Darrell Webb
    
    
    
    Frank Newman/s/ James Kerr
    
    April 15, 2010
    
    /s/ David Perdue
    
    April 15, 2010James Kerr
    
    
    
    David Perdue/s/ Scott Cowen
    
    April 15, 2010
    
    /s/ Beryl Raff
    
    April 15, 2010Scott Cowen
    
    
    
    Beryl Raff/s/ Joseph DePinto
    
    April 15, 2010
    
    /s/ Alan Rosskamm
    
    April 15, 2010Joseph DePinto
    
    
    
    Alan Rosskamm/s/ Ira Gumberg
    
    April 15, 2010
    
    /s/ Tracey  Travis
    
    April 15, 2010Ira Gumberg
    
    
    
    Tracey Travis/s/ Patricia Morrison
    
    April 15, 2010Patricia Morrison
No. 10-11158.

#### Philip Jordan, Petitioner v. Timothy Brunsman, Warden.

565 U.S. 870, 132 S. Ct. 222,

181 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6698.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K (the "Report") of Jo-Ann Stores
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending February 1, 2003, I, Brian P. Carney,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  May 2, 2003



                     /s/ Brian P. Carney
                     ---------------------------
                     Brian P. Carney,
                     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.63-1 APPENDIX 3.63

AP3.63. APPENDIX 3.63

LOCATION RECONCILIATION NOTIFICATION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZN.

Routing Identifier Code

(TO)

4-6 Enter RIC identifying the owner/manager to 

which the transaction is being forwarded.

Type of Location 

Reconciliation Request

7 Enter code from Appendix AP2.23 identifying 

Type of Location Reconciliation Request.

Number of DIC DZH 

Transactions to be 

Transmitted

8-14 Actual number of DIC DZH requests to be 

transmitted, e.g., 0000151.

Date (Cutoff) 15-18 Enter the date for location reconciliation. The 

last digit of the calendar is entered in record 

position 15 and the day of the year is entered 

in record positions 16-18; e.g., 2027 is Jan 

27, 2002.

Routing Identifier Code 

(FROM)

19-21 Enter RIC identifying the storage activity 

preparing the transaction.

Type of Media 22 Enter type of media code from Appendix 

AP2.15 identifying medium used to transmit 

the transactions.

Blank 23-80 Leave blank.
##### 



EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
  WITNESSETH
      Incorporation of Plan
 Grant of Option
   1




---



##### 



Purchase Price
 Exercise Terms
 Option Non-Transferable
 Notice of Exercise of Option
 2




---



##### 



Adjustment in Option
 Termination of Employment
    Disabled Employee
  Death of Employee
 3




---



##### 



Competitive Activities
 Binding Agreement
 4




---



##### 



ANNEX A
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Notice of Exercise
of Stock Option
 
 
 
 
  
 EMPLOYEE OR HIS OR HER ADMINISTRATOR,
EXECUTOR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR
QUALIFIED TRANSFEREE 5




---



##### 



ANNEX B
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
Attestation of Share Ownership
 
   Common Stock Certificate(s) No.
    
    
    Number of
    
    
    Number of Shares Subjector Brokerage Account
    
    
    Shares Represented
    
   
    to this Attestation
  o
    
    The maximum number of whole shares necessary to pay the Option Price and specified
taxes, or, if fewer, the total number of listed Shares, with any remaining amount to be
paid by check accompanying the Notice of Exercise.o
    
    of the listed Shares with the remaining amount to be paid by check
accompanying the Notice of Exercise.
  NameDate
    
    SignatureCo-Owners Name (if any)Date
    
    Co-Owners Signature
 6




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM
and
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 TO:FROM:
    
    Paul Domorski, CEODATE:
    
    5/21/2007SUBJECT:
    
    Stock Option Award
   Grant Date:
    
    Total Shares:Expiration Date:
    
    Exercise Price:1st Date for Exercise:
    
    Number of shares:2nd Date for Exercise:
    
    Number of shares:3rd Date for Exercise:
    
    Number of shares:4th Date for Exercise:
    
    Number of shares:
   
 ***********************************************
 I acknowledge and accept this Stock Option Agreement including the terms and
conditions set forth in Terms of Officer Stock Option, Form 5/18/2007.
    
    Validated, 2007
    
    Director, HRSignature
No. 10-10397.

#### Calvin Effron, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 835, 132 S. Ct. 139,

181 L. Ed. 2d 59,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5402,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 378.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the the Form 10-K), I,
Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                                 
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 21, 2007 |  |     |  |                                                                 
|                         |  |    
|                         |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                                            
|                         |  |     |  | Robert D. George                                                
|                         |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2852]


The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls; Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; DSP-85, Application/
License for Permanent/Temporary Export or Temporary Import of 
Classified Defense Articles and Classified Technical Data.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Application/License for Permanent/
Temporary Export or Temporary Import of Classified Defense Articles and 
Classified Technical Data.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-85.
    Respondents: Application for Export/Import Licenses of Classified 
Defense Articles.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,250 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Copies of the proposed information 
collection and supporting documents may be obtained from Charles S. 
Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. Interested persons are invited to 
submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the 
proposed survey by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent 
to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, (202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18331 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10224

 Conference Calendar

 

HERBERT HERMAN FEIST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division;

DARWIN SANDERS, Senior Warden of

Clements Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:97-CV-376

- - - - - - - - - -

August 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Herbert Herman Feist, Texas state prisoner # 318012, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his action based on the

conclusion that he had alleged no personal injury and therefore

had no standing to sue. Three requisites for constitutional

standing are (1) personal injury (2) with a nexus to the

defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct (3) which is likely to be
No. 98-10224

-2-

redressed by the requested relief. Allandale Neighborhood Ass'n

v. Austin Transp. Study Policy Advisory Committee, 840 F.2d 258,

261-62 (5th Cir. 1988). Feist has not specifically alleged a

personal injury on appeal. Feist flatly admits that he intended

for this lawsuit to be a class action, because "individually it

would do him no good." There can be no better proof than his own

admission that this suit will not and cannot redress any personal

injury to Feist. 

We will not overturn a decision to deny class certification

unless the district court has abused its wide discretion. See

McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 47 F.3d 158, 162 (5th

Cir. 1995). As the district court reasoned, Feist’s lack of

standing precludes him from representing the class. The district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying the request for

class certification. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED. As Feist’s assertions on appeal have no merit, his

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 95 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3153 

[Report No. 116–131] 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation to support research 

on opioid addiction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2019 

Ms. WEXTON (for herself, Mr. BAIRD, Ms. DEAN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, and Mr. KILMER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. WELCH, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. ROUDA, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. TRONE, Mr. 

LIPINSKI, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Ms. KENDRA S. HORN

of Oklahoma, Mr. BABIN, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LUCAS, Ms. 

SHERRILL, Ms. BONAMICI, and Ms. JUDY CHU of California 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3153 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation 

to support research on opioid addiction, and for other 

purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3153 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Expanding Findings for Federal Opioid Research and 

6 Treatment Act’’ or the ‘‘EFFORT Act’’. 

7 (b) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) research gaps currently exist in the preven9 tion and treatment of opioid addiction; 

10 (2) the National Science Foundation’s research 

11 on opioid addiction has increased understanding of 

12 the neuroscience of addiction, substance abuse inter13 vention, the role of illicit supply networks, the sec14 ondary effects on families, the use of technology to 

15 address the opioid epidemic, and options for alter16 native, non-addictive therapeutics for pain; and 

17 (3) the National Science Foundation and the 

18 National Institutes of Health have recognized that 

19 fundamental questions in basic, clinical, and 

20 translational research would benefit greatly from 

21 multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration. 

22 SEC. 2. NSF SUPPORT OF RESEARCH ON OPIOID ADDIC23 TION. 

24 The Director of the National Science Foundation, in 

25 consultation with the Director of the National Institutes 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 3153 RH

1 of Health, shall support merit-reviewed and competitively 

2 awarded research on the science of opioid addiction. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 95 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3153 

[Report No. 116–131] 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the National Science 

tion, and for other purposes. Foundation to support research on opioid addicJUNE 27, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-10904.

#### William Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 188,

181 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6243.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 1229.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130526(70) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 130526 COA: 254284 Wayne CC: 03-001038-02 QUENTIN JOHNSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of July 19, 2006, the applicati on for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was grante d, 475 Mich 907 (2006). Counsel for the defendant, John F. Royal and Cornelius Pitts, have filed a mo tion to withdraw as counsel, citing financial hardship. On order of the C ourt, the motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. MCR 7.316(A)(7).

We further ORDER the Wayne Circuit Court, in accord ance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whet her the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint John
F. Royal to represent the defendant in this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1239 

KA 11-02401 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES G. JAMIESON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S.

Sperrazza, J.), rendered May 20, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of misdemeanor driving while

intoxicated, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree and leaving

the scene of a personal injury incident resulting in death without

reporting. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree

(Penal Law § 125.12 [1]), leaving the scene of a personal injury

incident resulting in death without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law

§ 600 [2] [a], [c] [ii]), and driving while intoxicated (§ 1192 [3]). 

We agree with defendant that his purported waiver of the right to

appeal is unenforceable because the record does not establish that

County Court “ ‘engaged in a full and adequate colloquy, and [that]

defendant expressly waived [his] right to appeal without limitation’ ”

(People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928; see People v Jackson, 99 AD3d

1240, ___). Nevertheless, based on our review of the record, we

perceive no basis for reducing defendant’s sentence as a matter of

discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). 

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 10-6021.

#### David M. Deloria, Petitioner v. South Dakota Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 553,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8627.

178 L. Ed. 2d 378,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.