alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Thursday: August 30, 2012

 8:00 a.m. Welcome

Gregory Holzman MD, MPH: Deputy Director, Office for State, Tribal, Local and 

 Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Delight Satter, MPH (Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde): Associate 

Director for Tribal Support, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial 

Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

8:15 a.m. Success Story: Nez Perce Tribe

Jackie Perez (Nez Perce Tribe): Director of Students for Success 

8:30 a.m. Substance Abuse-through the Public Health Lens

Gregory Holzman MD, MPH: Deputy Director, Office for State, Tribal, Local and 

 Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 9:50 a.m. Tempe Campus Recreation Instant Recess® 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0k3zk8b-YU

10:00 a.m. Break

10:15 a.m. Tobacco Control Efforts.

Brian King, PhD, MPH: Epidemiologist, Office on Smoking and Health, National Center

 for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control 

 and Prevention

Jackie Kaslow (Ione Band of Miwok Indians): Alternate, Department Director, 

 Office for State, California Rural Indian Health Board

11:30 a.m. Lunch (On your own)

 
 1:00 p.m. Motor Vehicle Safety

Holly Billie, CAPT, RS, MPH, (Dine’ (Navajo)): Injury Prevention Specialist, National 

 Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

 2:15 p.m. Break

2:30 p.m. Tribal Testimonies

3:45 p.m. Wrap-up

Delight Satter, MPH (Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde): Associate 

 Director for Tribal Support, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial 

 Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

3:55 p.m. Closing Blessing

Melissa Tantaguidgeon-Zobel (Mohegan Tribe), Medicine Woman 

 

4:00 p.m. Meeting Adjourns
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY 

7 Jan 11 

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10 

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3O 

 6500 South MacArthur Blvd 

 Bldg 4, Rm 124 

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

SUBJECT: Title 14 CFR Exemption 5305 (Regulatory Docket FAA-2000-8419) 

1. Exemption 5305 was granted to the United States Air Force on 26 April 1991. As amended 

to 5305H, it exempts the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.209 (a) (1) and (b) 

through 30 April 2011. The requirement for USAF aircraft to conduct airborne counternarcotics 

training operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic interdiction without 

lighted aircraft position or anticollision lights remains unchanged. On behalf of the USAF, I 

request an extension in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 11. 

2. If you have questions or need further information, please contact me at (405) 739-9783 or 

email: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil. I appreciate your assistance. 

 

 

 TIMOTHY M. KERSEY, Lt Col, USAF 

 Chief, Flight Standards Division 

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE LUIS MUNOZ-GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10028

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00501-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Marvin E. Aspen, District Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted December 9, 2014*** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Munoz-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for reentry after

FILED

DEC 12 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Marvin E. Aspen, Senior United States District Judge

for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Munoz-Garcia contends that his conviction and sentence violate the Fifth

and Sixth Amendments because the fact of the prior conviction that subjected him

to enhanced penalties under section 1326(b)(2) was not alleged in the indictment. 

As Munoz-Garcia acknowledges, we are bound by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 239-47 (1998), in which the Supreme Court rejected this

argument.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10028
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2481

 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the western district of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

   Mr. Ford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the western district of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT 
              OF KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
western district of Kentucky.
    (b) Eastern District.--The district judgeship for the eastern and 
western districts of Kentucky (as in effect before the date of the 
enactment of this Act) shall be a district judgeship for the eastern 
district of Kentucky only, and the incumbent of such judgeship shall 
hold his office under section 133 of title 28, United States Code, as 
amended by this section.
    (c) Tables.--In order that the table contained in section 133 of 
title 28, United States Code, shall reflect the change in the total 
number of permanent district judgeships authorized under this section, 
such table is amended by amending the item relating to Kentucky to read 
as follows:

                                                                        
                                                                        
                                                                        
       ``Kentucky:                                                      
       ``Eastern.......................  5                              
       ``Western.......................  5''.                           
                                                                        

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries
Parsippany, New Jersey

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-63515, 333-132812 and 333-132815) of Emerson
Radio Corp. of our report dated June 30, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Emerson Radio Corp.
and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of
the three years in
the period ended March 31, 2008, which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.



Cranford, New Jersey
July 11, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,062
<PP&E>                                         120,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,670
<BONDS>                                        385,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           94,923
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                   (189,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,350
<SALES>                                         56,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,248
<CGS>                                           46,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,533)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Steadman , 2019-Ohio-4511.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BROWN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

- vs -

ANDREW J. STEADMAN III,

Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2019-06-008

D E C I S I O N 11/4/2019

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BROWN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT Case No. CRB1800940

Zachary A. Corbin, Brown County Prosecuting Attorney, Mary McMu llen, 510 East State Street, Suite 2, Georgetown, Ohio 45121, for appellee

Vivian L. Poe, P.O. Box 150, Bethel, Ohio 45106, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal fil ed by

appellant, Andrew J. Steadman III, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the

transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Brown Co unty Municipal Court, and

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review ofBrown CA2019-06-008

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any err ors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record i ndependently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and wit hout infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to w ithdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellan t.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no res ponse having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal i s dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

RINGLAND, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Pub. L. 94-409, notice is 
hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory Board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: 24 July 1998 (800am to 1600pm).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, DC 
20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maj Michael W. Lamb, USAF, Executive Secretary, DIA Science and 
Technology Advisory Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(I), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advised the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-18618 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
# C_2015398EN.01000601.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Seattle Genetics Inc. v Österreichisches Patentamt

(Case C-471/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual and industrial property - Proprietary medicinal products - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Article 13(1) - Supplementary protection certificate - Duration - Concept of the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the European Union’ - Whether account is to be taken of the date of the decision granting authorisation or the date on which notification was given of that decision))

(2015/C 398/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Seattle Genetics Inc.

Applicant:

Defendant: Österreichisches Patentamt

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the [European Union]’ is determined by EU law; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the [European Union]’ is determined by EU law;

| 2. | Article 13(1) of Regulation No 469/2009 is to be interpreted as meaning that the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the [European Union]’ within the meaning of that provision is the date on which notification of the decision granting marketing authorisation was given to the addressee of the decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 13(1) of Regulation No 469/2009 is to be interpreted as meaning that the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the [European Union]’ within the meaning of that provision is the date on which notification of the decision granting marketing authorisation was given to the addressee of the decision.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 99.  Statement Re: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Massachusetts Fincorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2002 (the "Report"), I, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


                                       By: /s/ Paul C. Green
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Name: Paul C. Green
                                           Title: President and CEO

Date: August 13, 2002

                           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Massachusetts Fincorp, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2002 (the "Report"), I, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company


                                       By: /s/ Eric L. Pearson
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Name: Eric L. Pearson
                                           Title: Treasurer

Date: August 13, 2002

<PAGE> 19
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of The
Corporate Executive Board Company (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                    

/s/ James J. McGonigle
James J. McGonigle
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2003

/s/ Timothy Yost
Timothy R.Yost
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2003
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2735 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total dollar 

amount requested for intelligence or intelligence-related activities of each 

element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that the annual budget submissions of the 

Presidents include the total dollar amount requested for 

intelligence or intelligence-related activities of each element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intelligence Budget 

5 Transparency Act of 2019’’. 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2735 IH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH 

2 ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT. 

3 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new para5 graph: 

6 ‘‘(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in 

7 the budget for intelligence or intelligence-related ac8 tivities of each element of the Government engaged 

9 in such activities in the fiscal year for which the 

10 budget is submitted and the estimated appropriation 

11 required for each of the ensuing four fiscal years; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term 

14 ‘element of the Government’ refers to each element 

15 of the intelligence community as defined in section 

16 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

17 U.S.C. 3003(4)).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yvon Pierre Cariou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

February 28, 2011

 

 
|   | /s/   Yvon Pierre Cariou                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Yvon   Pierre Cariou                    |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of   Dynamic Materials Corporation      |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Materials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----