alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC**

**ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of DynamicMaterials Corporation:

 

(1)          Form S-8 No. 333-58033

(2)          Form S-8 No. 333-54166

(3)          Form S-8 No. 333-115563

(4)          Form S-8 No. 333-143355

(5)          Form S-3 No. 333-150231

 

of our reportsdated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedules of Dynamic Materials Corporation and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Dynamic Materials Corporationincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2009.

 
|   | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|---------------------------------|

 

 

Denver, Colorado

March 12, 2010

 

----
No. 11-5.

#### Eric D. Lynn, Petitioner v. Edward Tarney, et al.

565 U.S. 878, 132 S. Ct. 241,

181 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5296.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 753.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18476]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

    Consistent with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and 42 U.S.C. 
9622(d), notice is hereby given that on June 12, 1998, a proposed 
consent decree in United States v. Kauffman & Minteer, et al., Civil 
Action No. 94-5225 (GEB), was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the District of New Jersey. This proposed consent decree 
resolves the United States' claims under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 
42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency (``EPA'') against Paul C. Kauffman relating to response costs 
that have been or will be incurred at or from a Site known as the 
Kauffman & Minteer Superfund Site (``Site'') located in Jobstown, 
Springfield Township, New Jersey. The consent decree requires Mr. 
Kauffman to pay the United States $25,000 in three installments.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Any comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should 
refer to United States v. Kauffman & Minteer et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-
1067.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 402 East State Street, Room 502, Trenton, New 
Jersey 08608, and at the Region II office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007. The proposed 
consent decree may also be examined at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 624-0892. A 
copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
(there is a 25 cent per page reproduction cost) in the amount of $6.75 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environment Enforcement Section, Environmental and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-18476 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
F i r s t   F u n d i n g   C o r p o r a t i o n
         Corporate Investment Bankers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     February 8, 2002                       700 Canal Street, 2nd Floor
                                            Stamford, Connecticut 06902-5921
                                            203-324-2626
     Strictly Confidential                  Facsimile 203-965-0605
     ---------------------                  Email: FrstFund@aol.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Mr. Rolf K. Liebergesell
     Chairman, President & CEO
     FARREL CORPORATION
     25 Main Street
     Ansonia, CT 06401-1601

     Dear Rolf:

     I thought it might be a good idea to memorialize in this letter some of the
     conversations we have had concerning unilateral alterations we have made to
     the  administration  of First  Funding  Corporation's  contract with Farrel
     Corporation   which  has  been  to  Farrel's  benefit  during  its  current
     challenging time.

     Since  July 1st of 2001 we have not  billed  for  regular  hourly  services
     pursuant to Section III,  Paragraph D of our Corporate  Financial  Services
     Contract as has been our custom and practice since 1986. Indeed,  this work
     has been utilized to support the range of services I have  provided  during
     this period of time so with the normal monthly  retainer,  we have utilized
     other personnel to support my activities.

     I am also attaching  herewith an invoice governed by that same Section III,
     Paragraph D of our contract for the deferred  hours in connection  with the
     First Union  financing and we are canceling  this invoice as we will not be
     billing for this either.

     Pursuant  to the Letter  Agreement  dated  November  1, 1991  amending  the
     Corporate  Financial Services Contract dated June 17, 1986, as you know for
     my  services  First  Funding is  entitled  to a monthly  retainer  check of
     $41,666.67.  Effective  March 1, 2002, as I discussed  with you, we will be
     reducing  this  amount by $50,000 per year and  hereinafter  until March 1,
     2003,  we will instead be billing  $37,500  monthly.  Accordingly,  we will
     adjust  our  services  with  a  view  toward   helping  Farrel  reduce  its
     expenditures.

     None of this is to  indicate  that we do not  stand  ready  to  assist  the
     Company in any way as we have in the past.  I wish you all success and look
     forward  to  participating  in any way you feel which may be helpful to the
     Company.

     Yours very truly,

     /s/ Charles S. Jones
     Charles S. Jones
     Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1210-DR]


Republic of the Marshall Islands; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a 
Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Republic of the Marshall Islands (FEMA-1210-DR), dated March 20, 1998, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective June 30, 1998.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-19272 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# Pneumococcal Vaccination-Age

# Tetanus Vaccination-Age

# Tdap Vaccination-Age

# Zoster Vaccination-Age

# Pneumococcal Vaccination-Race

# Tetanus Vaccination-Race

# Tdap Vaccination-Race

# Zoster Vaccination-Race
# C_2015213EN.01002004.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 February 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-77/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 213/33)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
No. 11-5718.

#### Marion Hirsch, Petitioner v. Enoch Pratt Free Library, et al.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 447,

181 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7436.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 1, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 21.1
 CLAIRES STORES, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF JANUARY 31, 2009
 Name
    
    JurisdictionBMS Distributing Corp.
    
    DelawareCBI Distributing Corp.
    
    DelawareClaires Accessories Spain, S.L.
    
    SpainClaires Austria GmbH
    
    AustriaClaires Belgium B.V.B.A.
    
    BelgiumClaires Boutiques, Inc.
    
    ColoradoClaires Canada Corp.
    
    DelawareClaires European Distribution Limited
    
    United KingdomClaires European Services Limited
    
    United KingdomClaires Fashion Property Corp.
    
    Cayman IslandsClaires France S.A.S.
    
    FranceClaires Germany GmbH
    
    GermanyClaires Holding GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandClaires International Europe GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandClaires International Property LP
    
    Cayman IslandsClaires Netherlands B.V.
    
    NetherlandsClaires Puerto Rico Corp.
    
    DelawareClaires Stores Canada Corp.
    
    CanadaClaires Switzerland GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandClaires Accessories UK Ltd
    
    United KingdomCSI Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgRSI International Limited
    
    Hong KongClaires Merchandising Corp.
    
    DelawareSassy Doo!, Inc.
    
    DelawareWhiteClaires Acessorios Portugal, Unipessoal LDA.
    
    PortugalBMS Fashion Corp.
    
    Cayman IslandsCSC Limited Partnership
    
    CanadaClaires China Services
    
    ChinaClaires Swiss Holdings LLC
    
    DelawareClaires (Gibraltar) Holdings Limited
    
    GibraltarClaires Holdings S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgClaires Distribution B.V.
    
    NetherlandsModewaren Femina Hgmbh
    
    Austria
 102
# C_2015294EN.01001301.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2015 — Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Fundação Eugénio de Almeida

da

(Case C-249/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Community figurative mark QTA S. JOSÉ DE PERAMANCA - Application for registration - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national figurative marks VINHO PÊRAMANCA TINTO, VINHO PÊRAMANCA BRANCO and PÊRAMANCA - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion))

(2015/C 294/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda (represented by J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda de Sousa, advogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Fundação Eugénio de Almeida (represented by: B. Braga da Cruz and J.M. Pimenta, advogados)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 28, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-1995
<CASH>                                       6,969,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,438,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                   369,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,705,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,080,933
<PP&E>                                      35,989,299
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,802,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,884,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,153,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       190,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,115,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,884,214
<SALES>                                     90,036,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,036,369
<CGS>                                       59,159,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,159,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (141,523)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,914,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,457,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,456,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,456,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED
IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          26,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,524
<PP&E>                                       1,332,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,519,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,553
<BONDS>                                        833,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    175,000
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,909
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,667
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,533
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,799
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
No. 11-5204.

#### Andrew Lang, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 384,

181 L. Ed. 2d 242,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6299.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-10778.

#### David Ellerby and Jermall Lilly, Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 170,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6430.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 696.
Order filed February 4, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00900

- CR

____________ LAKENDRICK EARL JACO BS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 1289471



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of States Exhibit 38.The clerk of the 338th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk o f this

court the original of States Exhibit 38, on or before February 9, 2015. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon comple tion of inspection, to return the original of States Exhibit 38, to the clerk of the 338th
District Court.

PER CURIAM
No. 11-5521.

#### Emmanuel King Shaw, Petitioner v. Byron Watson, Warden.

565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 323,

181 L. Ed. 2d 200,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5872.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 710.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A.D.C. and * From the 318th District Court

E.N.C., children, of Midland County

Trial Court No. FM 50087

No. 11-17-00190-CV * March 29, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jerry Clark, Jr.
# DLA hosts annual DoD distribution process owners meeting

/ Published Aug. 7, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Leaders from the Defense Logistics Agency and the Department of Defense discussed engagement opportunities and partnerships during a Distribution Process Owner Executive Board meeting Aug. 6 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.As DoD’s capstone governance forum for distribution processes, the board is the senior decision-making body established to collaborate, coordinate and direct distribution-related initiatives and operations in support of combatant commanders.“I think that the representation here in the room really does reflect the broader definition of logistics that we find frequently gets missed by people who aren’t part of this world,” said David Berteau, assistant secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness.The annual meeting was co-chaired by Berteau, DLA Director Air Force Lt. Gen Andy Busch and U.S. Transportation Command Deputy Commander Navy Vice Adm. Andy Brown. Although logistics for the past 15 years has been excellent, DoD is moving forward under increased financial constraint, Berteau said.“We are moving into a decade where logistics for the last 15 years has been superb, but it’s been marginally excellent because we were able to put the time and money on it we needed to have in order to succeed,” he said. “And everybody here in this room has been part of that. In the next decade, we’ve got the same challenges, but a whole lot less resources to do it with. So I think that the real challenge of processes and outcomes will be reflected in that.”Transportation is strategically important to the nation, Brown said, and as leaders in the logistics community, discussions like these can help spread that message.“All of this fits together,” he said. “There’s reasons why we have [the General Services Administration] at the table. [But] most people don’t understand how it all fits together. ... Those ships, trucks and airplanes are the ones that are going to help take us to war. And that’s part of the message that we need to get out to the community. So you have to help people get it and that’s part of the reason for today - to make sure we’re all on the same page and we have that story we can talk to people about.”Afterward, attendees heard briefings from DLA, TRANSCOM, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency and the Army’s Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command. Topics included an overview on joint strategic opportunities, the DLA Strategic Plan, the Joint Distribution Enabling Team and the Defense Personal Property Program.In addition, the meeting followed up on the status of several action items from previous roundtables held in August 2013 and 2014.
WARFIGHTER ALWAYS WARFIGHTER ALWAYS 1

DPC conducts follow-up 

on Effectiveness's of RA 

Supervisor issues Decision on Remote or TW during 

Core duty days to Requestor (1887-1)

Supervisor issues Decision to Requestor (1887-1); If request is for 

Remote Work or Ext. TW DPC submits Request to AA

DPC Provides RA packet to Supervisor; 

Supervisor Determines if Medical Documentation is needed. DPC makes Request for Medical Documentation: Requestor has 

30-45 Calendar to Provide 

AA Decision Process 

RA Request Submitted 

RA Process Timeline

1

DPC Initial Contacts w/ Employee & Supervisor

Interactive Process with Requestor; Discuss and Reviews Limitations, PD, 

Essential Functions and Provides RA Decision 

Milestone

Process Completed

Start of Process

2- Calendar days

5- Calendar days

15- Calendar days

Calendar is Paused 

4- calendar days

14- Calendar days

5 Calendar days

30-45-

Calendar days

RA is provided

DLA EEO, Diversity and Inclusion Division

Dec 04, 2023 
WARFIGHTER ALWAYS WARFIGHTER ALWAYS
!

Cuidado con

el queso fresco!

¿Sabía que algunos

quesos nos pueden enfermar?

¡Proteja a su familia!

o llame a:

Para más información vaya al http://www.cdc.gov/spanish/listeria/

!

Nunca compre queso 

fresco en la calle!

Además, que 

tenga marca.

Siempre compre queso 

fresco bien refrigerado 

y que esté hecho con 

leche pasteurizada.

Siempre compre queso 

fresco en la tienda.