alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**Certifications**
**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Geoffrey P. Jurick, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information: and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: June 28, 2004 /s/ Geoffrey P. Jurick  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has beenprovided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-151.

#### Francisco Archivaldo Padilla, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 254,

181 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5541.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 892.
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 April 21, 2011
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer
[ioiLDlNCOURTOF*

CATHY S. LUSK, CCE*1K

FILE COPY

RE: Case No. 15-0141 DATE: 2/19/2015

COA #: 12-13-00005-CV TC#: 2012-876-A

STYLE: THE GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL, INC.

v. RONALD MASTEN AND CHARLENE MASTEN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and •

filed a motion for extension of time to file petition

for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above

numbered and styled case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354"

TYLER, TX 75702
No. 10-10651.

#### Latif Khan, Petitioner v. Edward Bland, et al.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 85,

181 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6969.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas

Mr. David Jr. Cariaso Palomo

Deputy Director

Born and raised on the island of Guam, David Jr. Cariaso Palomo became the 

deputy director of DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas, in June 2022. He has 

been employed with the United States federal government for 17 years. 

Palomo began his federal career in 2005 as a GS-09, general supply specialist, 

quality assurance evaluator with DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas. In a 

year’s time, same occupation, Palomo advanced to a GS-11. In the four years as 

a QAE, he gained beneficial experience, knowledge and skills in all functional 

areas of DLA Distribution. In Nov. of 2009, he transferred and served as the 

security specialist at DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas for seven years. In 

May of 2017, he was promoted to the accountable officer position and has 

been instrumental in leading the DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas’ inventory program. He served two terms at 

rotational deputy director for DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas, from Sept. 2018 to Dec. 2019 and from Sept. 

2019 to Dec. 2019. His awards with DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas include the Global Excellence as the 2012 

DLA Distribution Security Civilian award, the DLA Superior Civilian Service Award and the DLA Meritorious 

Civilian Service Award.

Palomo served in the United States Army Reserves as a military police officer for 13 years. He completed seven 

years as an enlisted soldier and six years as an officer. In 2005, he completed the Primary Leadership Development 

Course, in which he received the Honor Graduate award. In 2007, he attended the Basic Officer Leadership Course 

and the Military Police Basic Officer Leadership Course. His leadership roles as a non-commissioned officer 

included being a team leader and a squad leader. His leadership roles as an officer included being a platoon leader, 

a convoy escort team commander and an acting executive officer.

His decorations include the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, Army Reserve Components 

Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Ribbon, Global 

War on Terrorism Service Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal with Campaign Star, Army Service Ribbonm Overseas 

Service Ribbon, Army Reserve Component Overseas Training Ribbon and Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “M” 

Device.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37116-37117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 3, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Piraeus Bank, S.A., Athens, Greece; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 56 percent of the voting shares of Marathon 
Banking Corporation, Astoria, New York, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Marathon National Bank of New York, Astoria, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Area Bancshares Corporation, Owensboro, Kentucky; to acquire 25 
percent of the voting shares of Broadway Bank and Trust, Paducah, 
Kentucky.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. First Pecos Bancshares, Inc., Midland, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First Alpine, Inc.,

[[Page 37117]]

Alpine, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Alpine Delaware Financial 
Corporation, Dover, Delaware, and First National Bank in Alpine, 
Alpine, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 6, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18282 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          55,506
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                       489
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,075
<PP&E>                                           5,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,223
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,610
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ ROBERT GREENBERG

Robert GreenbergChief Executive Officer
No. 10-10901.

#### Cuong Phan, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 856, 132 S. Ct. 187,

181 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5914.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
### Exhibit 32.1

### 

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Michael Wilson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ J. Michael Wilson               
|------------------------------------
|J. Michael Wilson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|August 16, 2004
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.16-1 APPENDIX 3.16

AP3.16. APPENDIX 3.16

LOGISTICS TRANSFER/DECAPITALIZATION 

FOLLOW-UP

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier 1-3 Enter DIC DLA.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the losing item manager to 

which this transaction is being forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of transferred 

item for which asset data is being requested. 

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Blank 25-29 Leave blank.

Document Number 30-43 Enter gaining item manager (GIM) assigned 

document number controlling this 

transaction.

Blank 44-61 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Effective)

62-64 Enter the original effective day (ordinal day 

of the calendar year) of the logistic transfer 

or decapitalization.

Blank 65-66 Leave blank.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the GIM preparing this 

transaction. 

Blank 70-80 Leave blank.
No. 10-7698.

#### Juwanna Wrotten, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 1189, 131 S. Ct. 1020,

178 L. Ed. 2d 845,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 877.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 73 App. Div. 3d 637, 901 N.Y.S.2d 265.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1804. KEVIN P. BENTLEY v. JOHN T. WILCHER.

Kevin P. Bentley appeals to this Court from the trial court’s denial of his

petition for habeas corpus relief. Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has

exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving habeas corpus. See Ga.

Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4). This appeal is therefore TRANSFERRED

to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 18, 2019

04/18/2019
No. 11-5564.

#### Nina Shahin, Petitioner v. Delaware, et al.

565 U.S. 807, 132 S. Ct. 387,

181 L. Ed. 2d 8,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6265.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 10-10730.

#### Raymond Franklin, Petitioner v. Georgia.

565 U.S. 846, 132 S. Ct. 165,

181 L. Ed. 2d 78,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5981.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 305 Ga. App. 354, 699 S.E.2d 575.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER63**

**OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**

 

I,David R. Asplund, the Chief Executive Officer of Lime Energy Co., certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

1.     The QuarterlyReport Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Periodended June 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Lime Energy Co. and itssubsidiaries.

 

 
| /s/  David R. Asplund    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David  R. Asplund        |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| August 12,  2009    |   |

 

----
No. 10-10924.

#### Taiwu Jenkins, Petitioner v. Thomas LaValley, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5962.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 298.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50130

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MONTEJO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-2205-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Montejo raises arguments

that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-59

& n.3 (5th Cir. 2010), which held that (1) the Sex Offender Registration and

Notification Act (SORNA) was a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the

Commerce Clause and (2) the defendant’s conviction under SORNA did not

violate his due process rights even though (a) the states in which he traveled had

not yet implemented SORNA and (b) he had not received actual notice of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-50130 Document: 00511964413 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 12-50130

SORNA’s registration requirements. See United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254,

258-62 (5th Cir. 2009). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file

a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 12-50130 Document: 00511964413 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012