alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10 (f)                

**AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS**

**OF**

**EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.**

**AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS**of Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. dated as of July 1, 2010 made by Peter L. Malkin, Anthony E. Malkin and Thomas N. Keltner, Jr., as its members. 

**WITNESSETH:**

**WHEREAS**, the parties hereto are all of the members of Empire State Building Associates L.L.C., a New York limited liability company formed pursuant to an agreement dated July 11, 1961, as amended by agreement dated September 30, 2001 (the “Operating Agreement”), having its principal office c/o Malkin Holdings LLC, One Grand Central Place, 60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165;

**WHEREAS**, paragraph 5 of the Operating Agreement provides that Malkin Holding LLC shall maintain the books and records of the limited liability company, shall supervise the operation of the Operating Agreement and shall be compensated therfor in an amount to be determined by the members;

**WHEREAS**, the members desire to change the amount of the fixed supervisory fee payable to such firm as set forth herein;

**NOW, THEREFORE,**the parties agree as follows:

1.  Malkin Holdings LLC shall be paid the sum of $725,000 per annum.  Such amount shall be increased annually at the rate of increase in the consumer price index during the prior year, and shall be payable as follows: (i) not less than $8,333.33 shall be payable each month and (ii) the balance shall be payable out of available reserves from the overage rent payment by Empire State Building Company L.L.C. pursuant to its operating sublease of the premises, as such lease may be amended from time to time.  If overage rent is insufficient to pay the full balance of such fee, any deficiency shall be payable in the next year in which overage rent is sufficient.  In addition, all disbursements and regular accounting services related to said firm’s maintenance of the books and records of the limited liability company and supervision of the operation of the Operating Agreement shall be payable directly by the limited liability company prior to the payment of the balance of the fee to said firm out of overage rent.

2.

Except as provided herein, the Operating Agreement is hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect pursuant to its terms.

/s/ Peter L. Malkin

/s/ Anthony E. Malkin

/s/ Thomas N. Keltner, Jr.

Peter L. Malkin

Anthony E. Malkin

Thomas N. Keltner, Jr.
EXHIBIT 24.02

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY

CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION

I, Guillermo Silva, Jr., Corporate Secretary of El Paso Electric Company, a Texas corporation (the Company),
do hereby certify that attached hereto is a true, correct and complete copy of the resolution authorizing signatures pursuant to a Power of Attorney for the 2009 Form 10-K, duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting of said
Board duly convened and held on January 28, 2010.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and have affixed the seal of
the Company on this 26th day of February 2010.



/s/ GUILLERMO SILVA, JR.Guillermo Silva, Jr.Corporate Secretary


(Corporate Seal)



---

EXHIBIT 24.02

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS

JANUARY 28, 2010

RESOLVED, that David W. Stevens, David G. Carpenter, Mary E. Kipp, and Gary D. Sanders are hereby duly appointed the
Companys, and its Officers and Directors, true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for its place and stead, in any and all capacities, with full power to act alone, to sign the Companys Annual Report on the 2009 Form
10-K, and in any and all amendments thereto, and to file such 2009 Form 10-K and each such amendment, with all exhibits thereto, and any and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby granting unto
each of the said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
No. 10-1515.

#### Yi Dong Chen, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5322.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 675.
No. 10M51.

#### Farhi Saeed Bin Mohammed, et al., Petitioners v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

562 U.S. 1090, 131 S. Ct. 811,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9489.

178 L. Ed. 2d 529,

December 6, 2010.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
1 

### Velocity Caps as Preapproved Technology for Impingement Mortality Control

A velocity cap is a device that is placed over a vertical inlet at an offshore cooling water intake.

This cover converts vertical flow into horizontal flow at the entrance into the intake. The device

works on the premise that fish will avoid rapid changes in horizontal flow, thus reducing overall

impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms.

Historically, velocity caps have been shown to reduce impingement by 68 to 99 percent. All

velocity caps include certain characteristics that are critical to the success of this technology:

1. Velocity cap(s) must be designed to ensure that fish are subjected to horizontal rather

than vertical flow from the intake structure.

2. Velocity cap intake flow should be at least 0.5 fps or greater to ensure that fish detect

the horizontal flow in time to escape impingement.

3. The velocity cap must be placed in an optimum location offshore and in the middle of

the water column to reduce impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms.

4. The determination of optimum location and flow characteristics are site

‐ specific and

should be approved by the permitting director.

There are more than a dozen velocity caps in operation at various facilities throughout the U.S.

These structures provide intake water flow to nuclear, coal and natural gas

‐ fired facilities

located on the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, and the Great Lakes.

Several studies in California have concluded that velocity caps significantly reduce

impingement. Studies at the Huntington Beach and El Segundo Generating Stations showed

overall reductions in entrapment (equated to impingement mortality losses) of 80 to 90

percent. Two additional studies at the Scattergood Generating Station included measurements

conducted pre ‐ and post

‐ installation of velocity caps, as well as more recent flow reversal

studies (EPA 2011; LADWP 2007). The results from the Scattergood study showed an overall

reduction of 83 percent. The Ormond Beach Generating Station studies conducted

concurrently with the Huntington Beach studies demonstrated overall reductions in

entrapment of 61 percent during the night and 87 percent during the day.

In comparative studies of offshore velocity cap intakes as compared to onshore intake

structures, studies from 1992

‐ 1998 and 2002

‐ 2006 indicate that the Seabrook Nuclear

Generating Plant in New Hampshire, with offshore velocity caps, reduced impingement impacts

by 68 and 83 percent, respectively, as compared to the onshore intake structure of the Pilgrim

Plant located in Massachusetts.2 Based on the successful history of operating velocity caps at several facilities, this technology

should be continued to be considered Best Technology Available for reducing impingement

mortality. Future installations of velocity cap structures should be designed to meet the

general criteria described above.
No. 10-747.

#### Frederick J. Harrington, Jr., Petitioner v. Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1054,

178 L. Ed. 2d 876,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 939.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 113.
No. 10-1504.

#### James W. White, Petitioner v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 115,

181 L. Ed. 2d 40,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5434.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 502.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1)                      | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                                        |                                       |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                        |
|                                  |                                                                   |                                  |
| Date: October                06, 2005 | By:                                                               | /s/ Robert                M. Callahan |
|                                       | Robert M. CallahanChief                  Executive                  Officer |
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.11-1 APPENDIX 3.11

AP3.11. APPENDIX 3.11

LOGISTICS TRANSFER/DECAPITALIZATION

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DEE or DEF, as appropriate.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point 

(ICP) to which this transaction is being 

forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item being 

transferred.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Quantity

(Transfer/ 

Decapitalization)

25-29 Enter quantity being transferred/ 

decapitalized, preceding significant digits 

with zeros.1 / 2

Document Number 30-43 Enter current document number of the losing 

ICP using consecutive numbers for each 

different inventory record control balance.

Suffix 44 Enter consecutive suffix code (beginning 

with the letter A in the initial transaction) 

when quantity for inventory control record 

balance exceeds 99,999.

Routing Identifier

Code (Losing)

45-47 Enter RIC of the losing ICP.

Blank 48-53 Leave blank.

Distribution 54-56 Enter distribution code if stocks are 

segregated and maintained by codes 

reflected in the distribution field; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Multiuse 57-61 For intra-Component use, enter data 

prescribed by Component. For interComponent use, leave blank.

1See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.1.

2See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, Paragraph AP3.3.2.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.11-2 APPENDIX 3.11

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Day of Year 

(Effective) 

62-64 Enter the effective day (ordinal day of the 

calendar year) of the logistic transfer or 

decapitalization.

Ownership/Purpose 65 To be used by gaining Inventory Control 

Point (ICP).

Supply Condition 66 To be used by gaining ICP.

Routing Identifier 

Code (Storage 

Activity)

67-69 Enter RIC of the storage activity at which 

item is stored.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Enter appropriate ownership/purpose code 

of the balance being transferred/ 

decapitalized.

Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code of the balance 

being transferred/decapitalized.

Multiuse 72 For intra-Component use, enter data 

prescribed by the Component. For interComponent use, leave blank.

Blank 73 Leave blank.

3

Unit Price 74-80 Enter unit price in effect for valuing the 

inventory. (For transfers within a 

Component, this field may be left blank.)

3 For intra-DLA use only, enter the intra-DLA logistics reassignment price type indicator when applicable; 

otherwise leave blank. (See ADC 125.)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mauro
Parissi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


December 12, 2003
                                             By: /s/ Mauro Parissi
                                                     -------------
                                             Name:   Mauro Parissi
                                             Title:  Chief Financial Officer
# Correlation of MILSTRAP Document Identifier (DI) Code Functionality to DLMS Supplements (DS)

# Correlation of MILSTRAP Legacy Document Identifier Code (DIC) Functionality to DLMS Implementation Convention (IC)

# Correlation of MILSTRAP Legacy Document Identifier Code (DIC) Functionality to DLMS Implementation Convention (IC)

14 of 15

6/15/2012

1 of 15

6/15/2012
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3065 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3065

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover Air Force 
Base for family members of members of the Armed Forces who die outside 
 of the United States but not in a theater of combat operations so the 
family may receive the remains of the deceased, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2019

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Norcross, Ms. Escobar, 
and Mr. Trone) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover Air Force 
Base for family members of members of the Armed Forces who die outside 
 of the United States but not in a theater of combat operations so the 
family may receive the remains of the deceased, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Heroes Family Travel Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF REMAINS OF CASUALTIES; TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR 
              NEXT OF KIN.

    (a) Transportation for Remains of a Member Who Dies Not in a 
Theater of Combat Operations.--Section 562 of the John Warner National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 10 
U.S.C. 1482 note) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``dying in a theater of 
        combat operations''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``in a combat theater of 
        operations'' and inserting ``outside of the United States''.
    (b) Transportation for Family.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
revise Department of Defense Instruction 1300.18 to extend travel 
privileges via Invitational Travel Authorization to family members of 
members of the Armed Forces who die outside of the United States and 
whose remains are returned to the United States through the mortuary 
facility at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,235,381 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,869,064<F1>
<PP&E>                                      39,000,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,081,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,787,640    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,147,297    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,787,640
<SALES>                                     10,138,602<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,213,217<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,705,990<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,507,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,507,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,507,226    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2,275<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2,275<F5>
<FN>
<F1>Includes prepaid rent            
<F2>Rental income
<F3>Includes dividend income
<F4>Leasehold rent, supervisory fees, legal fees and amortization of
    leasehold
<F5>Earnings per $10,000 participation unit, based on 3,300 participation units
    outstanding during the year.

                                       -38-<PAGE>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2961 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2961

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
          of the Samish Indian Nation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

    Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself, Mr. Cook, Mr. Cole, Mr. 
  Cardenas, Mrs. Torres of California, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Gallego, Mr. 
 LaMalfa, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Ms. Moore, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Ruiz, 
and Mr. Soto) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 
          of the Samish Indian Nation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Samish Indian Nation Land 
Reaffirmation Act''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF TRUST LAND STATUS AND ACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--The decision dated November 9, 2018, and the 
actions taken by the Bureau of Indian Affairs Northwest Regional 
Director to approve the application of the Samish Indian Nation to take 
approximately 6.70 acres of land into trust as described in the 
decision for the benefit of the Samish Indian Nation are ratified and 
confirmed.
    (b) Application.--This Act shall apply to all claims (including 
claims challenging the validity of title or the effectiveness of any 
action of the Secretary acquiring and taking land into trust) pending 
on the date of the enactment of this Act or filed on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Retention of Future Rights.--Nothing in this Act alters or 
diminishes the right of the Samish Indian Nation from seeking to have 
any additional land taken into trust by the United States for the 
benefit of the Samish Indian Nation.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-11148.

#### Michael Ray McMahan, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 869, 132 S. Ct. 221,

181 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6384,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


      1.  Elk Corporation of Dallas, a Delaware corporation, which owns all of
          the outstanding stock of (a) Elk Corporation of America, a Nevada
          corporation, (b) Elk Corporation of Alabama, a Delaware corporation,
          (c) Elk Corporation of Texas, a Nevada corporation, and (d) Elk
          Corporation of Arkansas, an Arkansas corporation.

      2.  Chromium Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

      3.  M Machinery Company (formerly known as Mosley Machinery Company,
          Incorporated), a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
          outstanding stock of M Service Corporation, (formerly known as Mosley
          Service Corporation), a Delaware corporation.

      4.  GA Industries Corporation (formerly known as Gory Associated
          Industries, Inc.), a Delaware corporation.

      5.  OEL, LTD, d/b/a Ortloff Engineers, LTD, a Nevada corporation.

      6.  Ortloff de Venezuela, S.A., a Republic of Venezuela corporation.

      7.  Elcor Management Corporation, a Nevada corporation.

      8.  NELPA, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

      9.  Elcor Service Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership.