alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 070198C]


Marine Mammals; File No. P79H

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Permit No. 887, issued to 
Institute of Marine Sciences, LML, University of California, Santa 
Cruz, CA 95060 (Principal Investigator: Ronald J. Schusterman, Ph.D.), 
was amended to extend the expiration date to December 31, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130 Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/
713-2289); and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90802-
4213 (310/980-4001).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson or Sara Shapiro, 301/713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject amendment has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the provisions of Sec. 216.39 of the 
Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 
CFR part 216).

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-18610 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|February 9, 2007 |  | /s/ KENNETH S. ORD                                  
|                 |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|                 |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                 |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RAYM ON D RAM I RE Z,

P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v . J A M E S E . T I L T O N , S e c r e t a ryof the C a l i f orni aD e pa rtm e ntof

C orr e c t i ons a nd R e habi l i t a t i on,

R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e lle e . N o. 09- 55227 D . C. N o . 5 : 0 0 - c v - 0 0 1 9 5 - V A P- SH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia V i r gi ni aA . P hi l l i ps , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry15, 2010

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: G O O D W IN , S C H R O E D E R an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ay m on d R am i re z app ea l s the deni al of hi s pet i t i on for aw ri tof habeas c o rp u s . W e a f

f i rm. T he C a l i f

orni aS upr e m e C ourt ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng R a m i r e z ’ s habe a s pe t i t i on w as no tan un re as on abl e app l i ca t i on of the “ narr ow prop ort i on al i ty pri nci pl e that 

# FI LED FEB 23 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

appl i es t o n on capi t al se nt ence s. ” E w in gv . Ca lifo rn ia , 538 U . S . 11, 20 ( 2003) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s a n d c ita tio n s o m itte d ) ; s e e al s o 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) . P osse ss i on of any quant i ty of i l l egal drug s i s no l es s s er i ou s than the theftoffe nses th atth e S u p rem e C o u rth as fo u n dn o tt o rai se an i n feren ce o f g ro ss d is p r o p o rtio n a lity . Se e T a y lo rv . L e w is , 460 F . 3d 1093, 1099 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . N or d o e s R a m ir e z ’s c r im in a l h is to ryr a is e s u c h a n in f e r e n c e , b e c au s e a n a tte m p t to re stra i n a vi ct i m i n h erho m e i s “ m arked b y . . . the threa tof vi ol ence . ” So lem v. H e lm , 463 U . S . 277, 292- 93, 296 ( 1983) . I f the gr a vi tyof

ape t i t i one r ’ s tr i gge r i ng o ffen se an d cri m i n al h i st o ry d o es n o tcreat e an i n feren ce o f g ro ss di spropo rt i on al i ty, w e nee d n otproceed t o i ntra j uri sdi ct i on al and i nt er

j uri sdi ct i on al c o m p a r is o n s . Se e H

arm e l i n v . Mi c hi

gan , 5 0 1 U .S . 9 5 7 , 1 0 0 4 ( 1 9 9 1 ) ( K e n n e d y , J ., c o n c u rr in g in p a rt a n d c o n c u rr in g in ju d g m e n t) ; R io s v . G a r c ia , 390 F . 3d 1082, 1 0 8 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . AF F I RME D.
No. 11-5138.

#### Stacy Partin, Petitioner v. Tom Simpson, Warden.

565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273,

181 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5710.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000034046
<NAME> EXOLON-ESK COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         440,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,315,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   419,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,395,000
<PP&E>                                      55,903,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,710,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,215,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,981,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    442,000
<COMMON>                                     1,026,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,830,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,215,000
<SALES>                                     68,592,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,592,000
<CGS>                                       53,212,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,054,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,469,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,857,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,893,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,964,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (502,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,462,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.44
        

</TABLE>
October 7, 2019

Dear Tribal Leader, 

On behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, I am pleased to announce the opening of 

the David J. Sencer CDC Museum exhibit, Changing Winds: Public Health and Indian Country. This exhibit 

celebrates the contributions of American Indians and Alaska Natives to public health by featuring 

success stories from tribal nations that developed innovative solutions to address public health 

concerns. 

Tribal nations are active and important contributors to public health. Aligning good health and wellness 

with traditional activities is at the forefront of culture, language, and practices across American Indian 

and Alaska Native communities—both rural and urban. Changing Winds highlights how tribal nations are 

addressing modern day challenges to good health and wellness while using traditional tribal knowledge 

and practices. The stories collected for Changing Winds provide a glimpse into the diverse cultures and 

continuing challenges affecting tribal communities across the United States and demonstrate how tribal 

nations are solving the complex problems they face. The stories chosen for Changing Winds were 

selected from the submissions provided to the CDC’s Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial 

Support’s Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances and the CDC Museum.

Opening along with Changing Winds is an accompanying exhibit, Roots of Wisdom: Native

Knowledge. Shared Science. This exhibit, organized by the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry,

invites guests to understand the important issues that indigenous cultures face. It further helps guests 

discover innovative ways Native peoples are problem-solving and contributing to the ongoing 

sustainability of their tribal communities.

These special exhibits will be featured by the CDC Museum from September 21, 2019, through May 1, 

2020. We invite you to visit the museum to experience all the exhibits have to offer. You can learn more 

about the exhibits and find information for planning your visit at www.cdc.gov/museum. 

Sincerely, 

José T. Montero, MD, MHCDS

Designated Federal Official, CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee 

Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support
No. 11-5017.

#### Karl Grant Losee, Petitioner v. Richard Garden, et al.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 258,

181 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5543,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*151Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 821.
No. 10-10501.

#### Eve Jolicoeur-Vasseur, Petitioner v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants, et al.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 147,

181 L. Ed. 2d 64,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6066,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*65Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 66.
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 105)]
[Notices]               
[Page 30899]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn10-148]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Record 
of Decision (ROD) on a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the 
Proposed Federal Action at the Macon County Airport, Franklin, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
approval of a FONSI/ROD on an FEA for a proposed Federal action at the 
Macon County Airport, Franklin, NC. The FONSI/ROD states that the 
proposed projects are consistent with the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969 and will not significantly affect the quality of the 
environment.
    The FEA evaluated Macon County Airport's proposal to extend Runway 
7/25 600 feet to a total length of 5,000 feet, extend the existing 
parallel taxiway, and construct a 300-foot runway safety area.
    After reviewing the FEA, the FAA has determined that project would 
not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 
Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
is not required.
    The FEA and the FONSI/ROD are available for review at:

FAA Southern Region, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia 
Avenue, Suite 2-260, College Park, GA 30337.
Macon County Courthouse, Tax Collector's Office, 5 West Main Street, 
Annex Bldg., Franklin, NC 28734-3005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Parks Preston, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., 
Campus Bldg., Suite 2-260, College Park, GA 30337. 404-305-7149.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia on May 19, 2010.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-13260 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
-       - 2022-11-03T16:26:29-0400
      - NOWICKI.ERICA.F.1502681431
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1840]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-210; RM-9166]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Soldiers Grove, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 290A to Soldiers Grove, 
Wisconsin, as that community's first local FM broadcast service in 
response to a petition filed by Lyle Robert Evans d/b/a Rural Radio 
Company. See 62 FR 54006, October 17, 1997. The coordinates for Channel 
290A at Soldiers Grove are 43-28-16 and 90-40-21. There is a site 
restriction 11.8 kilometeres (7.3 miles) northeast of the communtiy. 
With this action, this proceeding is terminated. A filing window for 
Channel 290A at Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, will not be opened at this 
time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel 
will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 97-210, adopted December 17, 1997, and 
released January 9, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Soldiers Grove, Channel 290A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1840 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
# C_2015073EN.01002501.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — easyJet Airline v Commission

(Case T-355/13) (1)

(Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Airport services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Case dealt with by a competition authority of a Member State - Rejection of the complaint on priority grounds - Decision of the competition authority drawing conclusions, in competition law, from an investigation conducted under national legislation applicable to the sector in question - Obligation to state reasons)

(2015/C 073/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (Luton, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Werner and R. Marian, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Luchthaven Schiphol NV (Schiphol, Netherlands) (represented by: J. de Pree, G. Hakopian and S. Molin, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 2727 final of 3 May 2013 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against Luchthaven Schiphol NV in relation to alleged anti-competitive conduct in the airport services market (Case COMP/39.869 — easyJet/Schiphol).

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders easyJet Airline Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders easyJet Airline Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Andrew P. Blocher, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |        |  |                                                  
|------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|              |  |        |  | /s/ Andrew P. Blocher                            
|June 25, 2009 |  | NAME:  |  | Andrew P. Blocher                                
|              |  | TITLE: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|              |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 10-11223.

#### Shawn Windsor, Petitioner v. Kentucky.

565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 230,

181 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7141.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.

Same case below, 413 S.W.3d 568.
**DoD Joint Supply PRC and Supply Discrepancy Reporting (SDR) Sub-Committee Meeting 12-2**

**April 9, 2012**

Agenda

1
No. 11M22.

#### Beverly Ong, Petitioner v. Babak Pasdar.

565 U.S. 809, 132 S. Ct. 80,

181 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6985.

October 3, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
No. 10-10285.

#### Robert Black, Jr., Petitioner v. Thomas Garvin.

565 U.S. 833, 132 S. Ct. 133,

181 L. Ed. 2d 54,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5240.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 10-10940.

#### Charles Thurston, Petitioner v. Merck & Company, Inc.

565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 192,

181 L. Ed. 2d 100,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6184.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 585.
No. 10-11205.

#### Antonio Flores, aka Miguel A. Lopez, Petitioner v. William Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 228,

181 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7102.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 18, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00691

- CV

CUANTO ANTES MEJOR, LLC and M.E. Phillip

, Appellants

v.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

, Appellee

From the 81st Judic ial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 12

- 00277

- CVK Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s partially oppose d second motion for an extension of time to file the appellee’s brief is granted. We order appellee’s brief due March 20, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2 ) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The co urt does not generally consider a heavy wor k schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance

.

___________________ ______________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of February, 2020

.

____________ _______________________ Michael A . Cruz

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1841]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 93-17; RM-8170]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Rosendale, NY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a Petition for Reconsideration filed 
by the State University of New York directed to the Memorandum Opinion 
and Order in this proceeding. 61 FR 14981 (April 4, 1996). With this 
action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 27, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Memorandum Opinion 
and Order in MM Docket No. 93-17, adopted January 5, 1998, and released 
January 9, 1998. The full text of this decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Dockets 
Branch (Room 230), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, International Transcription Service, (202) 857-3805, 1231 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1841 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F