alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yvon Pierre Cariou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | March 14, 2008                                                                                                
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/YVON PIERRE CARIOUYvon Pierre Cariou
President and Chief Executive Officer of Dynamic Materials Corporation

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Materials Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
No. 11-5084.

#### Jose Francisco Rios, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 267,

181 L. Ed. 2d 157,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5347.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 168.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38819-38820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-91-007]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance Tariff Filing

July 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 9, 1998, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with an 
effective date of June 15, 1998:

2nd Sub. Third Revised Sheet No. 361A

    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Letter Order issued by the Commissions in the above-captioned 
proceeding on June 24, 1998. Specifically, CNG states that its revised 
tariff sheet complies with the directive of the June 24 Letter Order, 
by establishing a July 1, 1998 commencement date for the thirty-month 
period established in Section 18.5 of the General Terms and Conditions 
of CNG's tariff.
    CNG states that copies of its filing have been mailed to its 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public

[[Page 38820]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19202 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5870.

#### Roberto Garcia Casares, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 353,

181 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7071.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
AAM-12-096-E December 12, 2011 Exemption No. 10404 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1331

Mr. Itai Shoshani

Chief Pilot Zip Aviation 14 Hangar Road White Plains, NY 10604

Dear Mr. Shoshani:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 22, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Zip Aviation (Zip) for an exemption from part 120 to allow Zip, which is operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Zip.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Zip Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Zip, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Zip are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Zip part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on December 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DUANE MARCEL HOLMES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 774 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-314-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to 
become effective August 1, 1998:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 681

    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order No. 587-G, 
Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines 
issued on April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-1-007, 83 FERC para. 61,029 
(1998). Texas Eastern states that the revised tariff sheet included 
herewith reflects Version 1.2 standards promulgated by the Gas Industry 
Standards Board which were adopted by the Commission and incorporated 
by reference in the Commission's Regulations.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on all 
affected customers, interested state commissions and all parties to the 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18503 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-5295.

#### Ethan Book, Jr., Petitioner v. Richard Tobin, et al.

565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 293,

181 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5576,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 11-5664.

#### Michael R. Ochoa, Petitioner v. Erin Rubin.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 90,

181 L. Ed. 2d 20,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6631.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
ESCAPE FROM SMOKING ADDICTION 

YOU CAN DO IT 


CHINESE QUITLINE 

(DEDICATED LINE FOR QUITIING IN CHINESE)
<PAGE>





                                                                      Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dectron Internationale
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ness
Lakwadala, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mauro
Parissi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               the operations of the Company.



By:      /s/ Ness Lakwadala
         -------------------------------------
Name:    Ness Lakwadala
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: September 14, 2004



By:      /s/ Mauro Parissi
         -----------------------
Name:    Mauro Parissi
Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 14, 2004


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2015016EN.01001401.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/14

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 November 2014 (Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici, Croatia) — VG Vodoopskrba d.o.o. za vodoopskrbu i odvodnju v Đuro Vladika

(Case C-254/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2), of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Community action in the field of water policy - Directive 2000/60/EC - Price to the consumer - Whether fixed costs can be invoiced - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2015/C 016/20)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VG Vodoopskrba d.o.o. za vodoopskrbu i odvodnju

Defendant: Đuro Vladika

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the (Croatia).

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

---
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.59. APPENDIX 3.59**

**LOCATION RECONCILIATION REQUEST**

## 

2

**AP3.63-**

AP3.59-1

APPENDIX 3.59
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               ENVIROKARE TECH INC
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Envirokare Tech Inc (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Verbicky,  Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Envirokare  Tech Inc and will be retained by Envirokare Tech Inc and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 16, 2004

/s/ John W. Verbicky, Jr.
---------------------------
John W. Verbicky, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 May 27 , 2009
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer
TBS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
&
SUBSIDIARIES                                                              EXHIBIT 10.4




FIRST
AMENDMENT TO JUNE 29, 2005 LETTER
 AGREEMENT
GRANTING RESTRICTED
 SHARES
TO FERDINAND V. LEPERE
 
 
 The
letter agreement dated June 29, 2005 between TBS International Limited (the
"Company") and Ferdinand V. Lepere ("Mr. Lepere"), pursuant to which 100,000
Common Shares of TBS International Limited (the "Shares") are granted, subject
to various restrictions, to Mr. Lepere, is hereby amended to provide that any
and all unvested Shares shall vest in full and Mr. Lepere shall have
unrestricted ownership rights in such Shares in the event Mr. Lepere's
employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause or Mr. Lepere
resigns for Good Reason, as such terms are defined in the TBS International
Limited 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.
 Agreed to
this 8th day of May, 2008.
 
 TBS
International Limited
 
 
 /s/ Ferdinand V.
Lepere                                                                      By: /s/ Joseph E.
Royce
 Ferdinand
V.
Lepere                                                                            Joseph
E. Royce, President and CEO
No. 10-10862.

#### Kyle DeBerry, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 182,

181 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5998.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 804.
No. 11-5825.

#### Lloyd D. Meeks, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 922, 132 S. Ct. 350,

181 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6938.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 522.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dectron Internationale
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ness
Lakwadala, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mauro
Parissi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of the
              operations of the Company.



By:      /s/ Ness Lakwadala
         ------------------
Name:    Ness Lakwadala
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: December 14, 2004



By:      /s/ Mauro Parissi
         -----------------
Name:    Mauro Parissi
Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 14, 2004


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33631]


Union Pacific Railroad Company; Trackage Rights Exemption; The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has 
agreed to grant overhead trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad 
Company (UP) from milepost 345.6, at Tower 55-UPRRX near Fort Worth, to 
milepost 217.3, near Temple, a distance of 128.3 miles in the State of 
Texas.<SUP>1</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On July 6, 1998, UP filed a petition for exemption in STB 
Finance Docket No. 33631 (Sub-No. 1), Union Pacific Railroad 
Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The Burlington Northern and 
Santa Fe Railway Company, wherein UP requests that the Board permit 
the overhead trackage rights arrangement described in the present 
proceeding to expire on July 31, 1998. That petition will be 
addressed by the Board in a separate decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on July 13, 1998.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to permit UP to use BNSF 
trackage while UP's trackage is out of service for maintenance.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33631, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, No. 830, Omaha, NE 
68179.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: July 13, 1998.

    By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19129 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
No. 11-5276.

#### David C. Spence, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 899, 132 S. Ct. 290,

181 L. Ed. 2d 175,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5537.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 447 Fed. Appx. 435.