alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Steadman, 2019-Ohio-4511.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BROWN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Appellee, 

 - vs - 

ANDREW J. STEADMAN III, 

 Appellant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. CA2019-06-008 

D E C I S I O N 

11/4/2019 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BROWN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT 

Case No. CRB1800940 

Zachary A. Corbin, Brown County Prosecuting Attorney, Mary McMullen, 510 East State 

Street, Suite 2, Georgetown, Ohio 45121, for appellee 

Vivian L. Poe, P.O. Box 150, Bethel, Ohio 45106, for appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Andrew J. Steadman III, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the 

transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Brown County Municipal Court, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Brown CA2019-06-008 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

RINGLAND, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
No. 10-10876.

#### Christopher B. Thompson, Petitioner v. Mike Dittman, Warden.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 184,

181 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6426,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
SIMPSON.DALAI Digitally signed by

SIMPSON.DALAINE.1365142846

NE.1365142846 Date: 2023.02.21 09:32:01 -05'00'

THOMAS.SHAWN.LEE.1058935499 Date: 2023.02.21 15:36:41 -05'00'

Digitally signed by THOMAS.SHAWN.LEE.1058935499

LOCAL AGREEMENT – ARTICLE 49 

WELLNESS/FITNESS PROGRAM 

BETWEEN

DLA Distribution Headquarters (HQ) and DLA Distribution Susquehanna, PA (DDSP) (includes 

all the bargaining unit employees in the area) 

AND

American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), Local 2004 and Local 1156

Article 49, Section 2(E) of the Master Labor Agreement (MLA) between DLA and AFGE C169 states 

that alternate arrangements for off-site facilities are subject to negotiations between parties at the local 

level and are authorized to be included in Local Agreements. Accordingly, the parties agree: 

• For production-oriented operations, employees will be encouraged to use on-site fitness 

facilities. If a requested activity is not available on-site, the employee’s supervisor may approve 

the use of an off-site facility, provided it meets the requirements of the Wellness/Fitness 

Program. A minimum of thirty (30) minutes of one (1) hour of administrative leave must be 

dedicated to the approved fitness activity. 

For the Union: For DLA:

Da’Laine Simpson Brent Barnes, Chief Negotiator

AFGE, Local 2004 DLA, Distribution HQ and DDSP

Shawn Thomas 

AFGE, Local 1156
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.3


                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered
into this 30th day of August, 1999 between PH GROUP INC., and Ohio corporation
with a place of business at 2365 Scioto Harper Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43204, (the
"Company"), and CHARLES T. SHERMAN of Powell, Ohio (the "Executive").

      WHEREAS, the parties hereto have entered into an Employment Agreement
dated as of January 23, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement in certain
respects;

      NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained,
the parties, hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

      SECTION 1.   AMENDMENT.
                   ---------

      1.1    Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its
             entirety and the following substituted therefor:

      Section 2.  TERM   Subject to Sections 4 and 5 hereof, the term of the
      Agreement shall be For a period commencing September 1, 1999, and
      terminating on August 31, 2003 and shall Continue thereafter on a
      year-to-year basis unless either party hereto gives written notice to the
      Other at least six months prior to August 31 of the year in which such
      party intends to have this Agreement terminate that such party does not
      intend to renew this Agreement (the "Term").

      Section 2.  CONTINUING VALIDITY.  Except as amended hereby, all term and
      provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect as though this First Amendment were a part of the original
      Employment Agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
      Agreement as of the date first written above.


PH GROUP INC.                              EXECUTIVE


By: \Michael W. Gardner                        By: \Charles T. Sherman
-----------------------                        -----------------------



                                       91
No. 10-11241.

#### Craig Latwain Chestnut, Petitioner v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 874, 132 S. Ct. 232,

181 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7086.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 304.
# C_2014409EN.01003103.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Peggy Kieck v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-118/14) (1)

1

2014/C 409/45

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.

1

---
No. 10-11049.

#### Jermaine Weeden, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 207,

181 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6108.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 889.
#### *Avnet, Inc., Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Revenue, Respondent,*

No. 92080-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45108-5-II, April 28, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 427. *Granted*January 6, 2016.
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-17-1999 

# W itk o w sk i v . W elch

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 98-1213

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" W itk o w sk i v . W e lch " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 131. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/131

### No. 98-1213

JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D.; GRACE WITKOWSK I; JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D., P.C. DEFINED BENEFIT PE NSION PLAN; JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D., TRUSTEE, App ellants v. ROBERT G. WELCH; ROBERT G. WELCH, P.C.; INTREPID ONE SERVICES, INC.; HISTORICAL SECOND STRE ET DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES; ROBERT G. WELCH, GENERAL PARTNER; ROBE RT G. WELCH, TRUSTEE; RONALD J. SRIEN, MORTGAGEE

Notice of Corrections to Opinion

Please note the following correction to the opi nion issued in theaboveentitled appeal on May , 1999: On page 4 of the slip opinion in footnote 6 , the sentence which begins with, "The Appellees...," should r ead, "The Appellants...."

This correction should be made to the final version of the opinion when it is published.

/s/ P. Douglas Sisk Clerk

May 17, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 190 (Thursday, October 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 59148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24948]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9935-03-Region 4; CERCLA-04-2015-3757]

Klouda Estate Superfund Site, Fort Valley, Peach County, Georgia; 
Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with the 
Estate of Charles Joseph Klouda concerning the Klouda Estate Superfund 
Site located in Fort Valley, Peach County, Georgia. The settlement 
addresses recovery of CERCLA costs for a cleanup action performed by 
the EPA at the Site.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
November 2, 2015. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
amended settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst using the contact 
information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by 
referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods:
     Internet: www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
     Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: September 2, 2015.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Enforcement and Community Engagement Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-24948 Filed 9-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VIII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending  Dec.  31,  2002  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
No. 10-9973.

#### James Washington, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 830, 132 S. Ct. 127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5661.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 403.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee 
meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Executive Subcommittee.
    Time and Dates: 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. July 22, 1998.
    Place: Room N-502, State of Illinois Building, 160 N. LaSalle 
Street, Chicago, Illinois.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The Executive Subcommittee of the National Committee on 
Vital and Health Statistics will hold a meeting on July 22, 1998 in 
Chicago. At the meeting, the Subcommittee will review the status of 
current work plans and progress, and plan future priorities and 
activities. The Subcommittee also is expected to plan the agenda for 
the upcoming September and November 1998 meetings of the full 
committee.
    Contact person for more information: Substantive information as 
well as an agenda for the meeting and a roster of committee members 
may be obtained by visiting the NCVHS website (<a href="http://
aspe.os.dhhs.gov/ncvhs">http://
aspe.os.dhhs.gov/ncvhs</a>), where an agenda will be posted prior to the 
meeting. You may also call James Scanlon, NCVHS Executive Staff 
Director, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation, DHHS, Room 440-D. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201, telephone (202) 690-7100, or 
Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, CDC, Room 
1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, 
Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 436-7050.

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-18876 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-04-M
No. 10-1527.

#### Don Halvorson, et ux., Petitioners v. North Latah County Highway District, et al.

565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118,

181 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5511.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.

Same case below, 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497.
American Institutes for Research Task Order 18: Study on Sustaining the Positive Effects of Preschool—C-1

1695_03/15

Appendix C. Preinterview Survey for Districts and 

Principals
American Institutes for Research Task Order 18: Study on Sustaining the Positive Effects of Preschool—C-2

Study on Sustaining the

Positive Effects of Preschool

Preinterview Survey for Districts and Principals

American Institutes for Research (AIR), under contract with the Policy and Program Studies 

Service (PPSS) within the U.S. Department of Education, is conducting a study of practices in 

early elementary school to sustain the effects of preschool. The purpose of the study is to 

document characteristics of programs and policies in early elementary school that support 

student growth and development, such as PK–3 alignment, differentiated instruction, and other 

programs designed to sustain the advantages of preschool. This brief survey aims to gather some 

basic information in advance of our interview. 

Our research is focused on making connections between early elementary school and earlier 

preschool experiences that students may have had. Therefore this set of questions focuses on 

preschool and preschool-related data the district or school might collect.

1. Does your district [OR SCHOOL] track which students have participated in preschool 

programs (e.g., those that intend to help prepare students for kindergarten)?

_____ yes ______ no

2. If preschool participation is tracked, approximately what percentage of district [OR 

SCHOOL] kindergartners attended preschool of any type? 

_________%

a. We are interested in what type of preschool programs those students attended. What 

percentage of kindergartners in your district [OR SCHOOL] attended the following types 

of preschool programs?

Private preschools or nursery schools _______%

Public state or district funded programs _______%

For principals only: Preschool located at your school _______%

Head Start _______%
American Institutes for Research Task Order 18: Study on Sustaining the Positive Effects of Preschool—C-3

3. If your district [OR SCHOOL] tracks preschool participation, does the district [OR 

SCHOOL] analyze student outcomes based on whether or not students attended preschool as 

students progress through early elementary school? 

_____ yes (GO TO NEXT QUESTION) ______ no (END)

a. If your district [OR SCHOOL] analyzes outcomes based on preschool attendance, please 

describe your analyses. How do you compare students who attended preschool versus 

those who did not? Which outcomes or assessments are used? 

b. If your district [OR SCHOOL] analyzes outcomes based on preschool attendance, what 

patterns do you see in the data? 

Thank you for providing this information!
APPENDIX IX 

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DATA
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, which this
statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of ElkCorp.
 Dated: September 6, 2006By

    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Controller
No. 10-10887.

#### Shondel Lamar Larkin, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden.

565 U.S. 855, 132 S. Ct. 186,

181 L. Ed. 2d 94,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6249.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*95Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 708.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32(a)



                                 TXU GAS COMPANY
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                               CERTIFICATION OF CEO


         The undersigned, M. S. Greene, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive of TXU
Gas Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
         31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 17th day of March, 2004.





                            /s/ M. S. Greene
                       ------------------------------------------------
                       Name:    M. S. Greene
                       Title:   Vice Chairman and Chief Executive









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Gas Company and will be retained by TXU Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2987 

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to require the appointment 

by the President of the Assistant to the President for National Security 

Affairs to be made by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. FOSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign 

Affairs, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to require 

the appointment by the President of the Assistant to 

the President for National Security Affairs to be made 

by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Security Ac5 countability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2987 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT AND CONFIRMATION OF ASSISTANT 

2 TO THE PRESIDENT FOR NATIONAL SECU3 RITY AFFAIRS. 

4 Section 101 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

5 U.S.C. 3021) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(g) ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR NATIONAL

8 SECURITY AFFAIRS.—The Assistant to the President for 

9 National Security Affairs shall be appointed by the Presi10 dent, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-9541.

#### John M. Stephenson, Petitioner v. Bill K. Wilson, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison.

565 U.S. 829, 132 S. Ct. 124,

181 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5742.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 619 F.3d 664.
No. 10-6548.

#### LaVern Berryhill, Petitioner v. Edward Evans, et al.

562 U.S. 1132, 131 S. Ct. 976,

178 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 557.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.