alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1



Ethyl Corporation and Subsidiaries

Computation of basic and diluted earnings per share

For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

(In thousands except per share amounts)



|                                                           |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                           |  | 2003 |        | 2002 |   | 2001   | 
|Net income (loss) applicable to common stock (1)           |  | $    | 37,053 |      | $ | 9,909  |  | $ | (105,040 | )
|                                                           |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |          |  
|                                                           |  |      |       
|Average number of shares of common stock outstanding (2,3) |  |      | 16,733 |      |   | 16,689 |  |   | 16,689   |  
|                                                           |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |          |  
|                                                           |  |      |       
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                            |  | $    | 2.21   |      | $ | 0.59   |  | $ | (6.29    | )
|                                                           |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |          |  
|                                                           |  |      |       
|Diluted earnings (loss) per share                          |  | $    | 2.19   |      | $ | 0.59   |  | $ | (6.29    | )
|                                                           |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |          |  



Notes:



|(1) | In the periods presented, the Company had only one class of common stock outstanding.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | To determine the average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents, the average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding (actual or
assumed for equivalents) during each month were added together and the sum was then divided by 12.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | For diluted earnings per share, the shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options would be 207, 43 and 0 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and the
shares of common stock equivalents would have been 16,940, 16,732 and 16,689, respectively.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.35(2)


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


PULSE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION


2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN







The Pulse Electronics Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below, effective April 25, 2014, subject to stockholder approval:


 


I.







Section 4.1(b) of the 2012 Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:







Section 4.1            Number of Shares Available for Grants. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2 and except as provided in Section 5.6(b), the maximum number of Shares hereby reserved for delivery under the Plan shall be 1.5 million, including Shares delivered pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options granted hereunder.







If any Shares subject to an Award granted hereunder (other than a Substitute Award granted pursuant to Section 5.6.(b)) are forfeited or such Award otherwise terminates without the delivery of such Shares, the Shares subject to such Award, to the extent of any such forfeiture or termination, shall again be available for grant under the Plan. For avoidance of doubt, however, if any Shares subject to an Award granted hereunder are withheld or applied as payment in connection with the exercise of an Award or the withholding or payment of taxes related thereto (“Returned Shares”), such Returned Shares will be treated as having been delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of Shares available for grant under the Plan and shall not again be treated as available for grant under the Plan. Moreover, the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan may not be increased through the Company’s purchase of Shares on the open market with the proceeds obtained from the exercise of any Options granted hereunder. Upon settlement of an SAR, the number of Shares underlying the portion of the SAR that is exercised will be treated as having been delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of Shares available for grant under the Plan and shall not again be treated as available for grant under the Plan.







Shares delivered pursuant to the Plan may be, in whole or in part, authorized and unissued Shares, or treasury Shares, including Shares repurchased by the Company for purposes of the Plan.







II.







Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
E'TOWN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                 Exhibit 11
         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
               (In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                               1997          1996         1995
                                             ---------------------------------
BASIC
EARNINGS
Income Before Preferred Stock
 Dividends of Subsidiary                     $ 20,073     $ 15,886      $16,109
Deduct: Preferred Stock Dividends                (813)        (813)        (813)
                                             -----------------------------------
Net Income Available for Common Stock        $ 19,260     $ 15,073      $15,296
                                             ===================================
SHARES
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding      7,891        7,668        7,093
                                             -----------------------------------
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock     $   2.44     $   1.96      $  2.16
                                             ===================================
DILUTED
EARNINGS
Income Before Preferred Stock Dividends
   of Subsidiary                             $ 20,073     $ 15,886      $16,109
Deduct: Preferred Stock Dividends                (813)        (813)        (813)
Add: After Tax Interest Expense Applicable
 to 6 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Debentures    500          513          524
                                             -----------------------------------
Adjusted Net Income                          $ 19,760     $ 15,586      $15,820
                                             ===================================

SHARES
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
 Outstanding                                    7,891        7,668        7,093
Shares Which Could Have Been Purchased
 With the Proceeds From Exercise of Stock Options  40            6            2
Assuming Conversion Of 6 3/4% Convertible
 Subordinated Debentures (a)                      284          292          299
                                             -----------------------------------
 Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
    Outstanding as Adjusted                     8,215        7,966        7,394
                                             -----------------------------------
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock   $   2.41     $   1.96      $  2.14
                                             ===================================

(a) Convertible at $40 per share.
DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Mr. John Northrup

Director

John Northrup is director, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma 

City, Oklahoma. He has been employed by DLA Distribution for 10 years, 

serving in various supervisory positions as a supply management specialist, 

distribution facilities specialist and distribution facilities manager. Northrup’s 

positions have included the Norfolk depot representative from October 2009 

- July 2010, value stream owner CCP/ALOC operations, from July 2010 – 

March 2012, chief, support operations, from March 2012 – May 2014 and 

Eastern Distribution Center facility manager from May 2014 – January 2020. 

Northrup also served as acting director at DLA Distribution Jacksonville, 

Florida, for six months in 2019.

Additionally, Northrup’s background includes three years with Science Application International Corporation 

and two years with the Department of Navy, Navy Supply Weapon Systems Support, formerly known as 

Naval Inventory Control Point Engineering and Product Support, site and programs manager for the Asset 

Protection and Pollution Prevention Division within NAVSUP WSS. Northrup spent over 17 years with United 

Parcel Service with specific experience across engineering, transportation, labor relations and hub and package 

operations culminating in his assignment as director of hub operations for the Desert Mountain District 

spanning Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico. 

Northrup was born in San Angelo, Texas, the son of an Air Force veteran. After living in Europe for five 

years, his family settled in the Northeastern United States. He attended Ottawa University and graduated with 

a Bachelor of Arts degree in education with a major in math and minor in physical education. Additional 

education includes 320 hours of Executive Leadership Training, Lean Six-Sigma, and ISO 9000. He is certified at 

the Program Management III Level, Total Quality Management, Balanced Scorecard and Quality Improvement 

Process. 

His awards include Letters of Commendation, Sustained Superior Performance Awards, Special Act Awards, 

and the DLA Superior Civilian Service Award. Northrup brings a unique perspective to his position based on 

the broad experience gained from the private sector, contract support, Department of Navy, DLA Distribution 

Headquarters, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania and DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1667]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Oklahoma Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Oklahoma Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 19, 1998, at the 
Clarion Hotel/Comfort Inn Conference Center, 4345 North Lincoln 
Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105. The purpose of the meeting is 
to plan future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, January 16, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-1667 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
DoD Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR)

Subcommittee Meeting 03-1

HQ Complex, Ft. Belvoir Conference Room 2905

August 18-19, 2003

Meeting Documents

SDR To Be-As Is Briefing

Data Content Table-SDR Response

Web SDR Distribution Business Rules

Web SDR Information

Web SDR slides

Next update to SDR publication
No. 10-8016.

#### Ricardo Mendez-Valdez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1193, 131 S. Ct. 1034,

178 L. Ed. 2d 853,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 683.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 51.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3166 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to modernize certain forms and surveys 

of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. LEE of California, 

Ms. MOORE, Ms. ADAMS, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. BROWN

of Maryland, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. WATERS, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. 

LEWIS, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. BASS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. 

OMAR, Mr. RUSH, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. SIRES, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. MENG, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. 

CISNEROS, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. HORSFORD, Mr. SWALWELL

of California, Mr. COX of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 

LAWSON of Florida, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. SEWELL

of Alabama, Ms. PRESSLEY, Mr. CASE, and Ms. ESCOBAR) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to modernize certain 

forms and surveys of the Department of Defense, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3166 IH

1 SECTION 1. MODERNIZATION OF CERTAIN FORMS AND 

2 SURVEYS. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

4 a study to identify each form and survey of the Depart5 ment of Defense, in use on the date of the enactment of 

6 this Act, that contains a term or classification that the 

7 Secretary determines may be considered racially or eth8 nically insensitive. 

9 (b) REPORTS.— 

10 (1) INTERIM REPORTS.—On the date that is 90 

11 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

12 on the date that is 180 days after such date of en13 actment, the Secretary shall submit to the Commit14 tees on Armed Services of the House of Representa15 tives and the Senate a report on the status of the 

16 study conducted under subsection (a). 

17 (2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than one year 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec19 retary shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

20 Services of the House of Representatives and the 

21 Senate a report on the results of the study con22 ducted under subsection (a) that includes— 

23 (A) a list of each form and survey identi24 fied under such study; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3166 IH

1 (B) a plan for modernizing the terms and 

2 classifications contained in such forms and sur3 veys, including legislative recommendations. 

4 (c) MODERNIZATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 18 

5 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

6 Secretary shall carry out the plan included in the report 

7 submitted under subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan

Cmdr. Daniel Maldonado III

Supply Corps, United States Navy

Commander

Commander Maldonado earned his commission in the Navy Supply Corps through 

Officer Candidate School program in 2006.

He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Management from the University 

of Texas at the Permian Basin and Master of Business Administration in Petroleum 

Management from the University of Kansas. He completed the Navy Business 

Resources Management Program at Darden School of Business, University of Virginia.

His afloat and operational tours include duties as Logistics Department Head, SEAL 

Team FIVE; Deputy Commander Army - G4 Operations Officer, NATO Training 

Mission Afghanistan; and Supply Officer, Mine Countermeasures Rotational Crew 

Fearless embarked on USS Ardent (MCM-12) and USS Chief (MCM-14).

Ashore, he served as Sensitive Activities Logistics Division Chief, Directorate of 

Logistics, U.S. Special Operations Command; completed a Military Executive Fellowship under the Navy’s Training with 

Industry (TWI) Program at ExxonMobil, Houston, TX; served as the Regional Fuels Officer, Naval Supply Systems Command 

Fleet Logistics Center San Diego; and Naval Acquisition Contracting Officer Internship, DLA Land and Maritime.

Commander Maldonado joined Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, in May 2024.

He is a qualified Naval Expeditionary Supply Corps Officer, Surface Warfare Supply Corps Officer, and member of the 

Defense Acquisition Corps. His personal awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (2 awards), Meritorious 

Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (three awards), and 

Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (two awards). Additionally, he is the 2019 recipient of the Navy Fuels Officer of 

the Year Award for Excellence in Naval Fuel Management.
# C_2014039EN.01002502.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/25

---

Action brought on 4 December 2013 — TrekStor v OHIM (SmartTV Station)

(Case T-649/13)

2014/C 39/45

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by O. Spieker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2013 (Case R 128/2013-4) and alter the contested decision to the effect that the mark ‘SmartTV Station’ (Application No: 010595577) is allowed to proceed to registration in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2013 (Case R 128/2013-4) and alter the contested decision to the effect that the mark ‘SmartTV Station’ (Application No: 010595577) is allowed to proceed to registration in its entirety;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SmartTV Station’ for goods in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No 10595577

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000032312
[NAME] EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS
<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                                 YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-1999
[PERIOD-START]                             APR-01-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1999
[CASH]                                       1,572,423
[SECURITIES]                                 1,775,933
[RECEIVABLES]                                  638,248
[ALLOWANCES]                                    35,000
[INVENTORY]                                  3,522,579
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             8,267,025
[PP&E]                                       2,881,595
[DEPRECIATION]                               2,150,315
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               9,490,494
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          781,528
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                        73,084
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                   7,986,555
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 9,490,454
[SALES]                                      5,895,567
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             5,895,567
[CGS]                                        4,543,418
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                7,115,154
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             (275,755)
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                30,820
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              71,641
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (1,015,473)
[INCOME-TAX]                                 (432,600)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (582,873)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (582,873)
[EPS-BASIC]                                    (.15)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.15)
</TABLE>
# C_2014024EN.01003402.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/34

---

Action brought on 20 November 2013 — AIC v OHIM — ACV Manufacturing (Heat exchangers)

(Case T-615/13)

2014/C 24/64

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AIC S.A. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ACV Manufacturing (Seneffe, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 291/2012-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 291/2012-3;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The design for a product described as ‘heat exchangers’ — Registered Community Design No 1 618 703-0001

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: It was alleged that the design did not fulfil the requirements of Article 4(1) and (2), in conjunction with Articles 5 and 6 and in particular Article 8(1) and (2) CDR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested RCD invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(2) CDR.

Pleas in law:

---