alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 72333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29339]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2012-OS-0013]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
4, 2013.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Request for approval for Procurement 
Technical Assistance Center Cooperative Agreement Performance Report, 
DLA Form 1806; OMB Control Number 0704-0320.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 95.
    Responses per Respondent: 4.
    Annual Responses: 380.
    Average Burden per Response: 7 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,660 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The Defense Logistics Agency uses the report as the 
principal instrument for measuring the performance of Cooperative 
Agreement awards made under 10 U.S.C. Chapter 142.
    Affected Public: State and local governments; private nonprofit 
organizations; Indian tribal organizations and Indian economic 
enterprises.
    Frequency: Quarterly.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: November 21, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-29339 Filed 12-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
No. 10-1489.

#### Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen, Petitioner v. Starbucks Coffee Corporation.

565 U.S. 930, 132 S. Ct. 368,

181 L. Ed. 2d 234,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6786,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 606.
Exhibit 10.34


 





AMENDMENT


 


This AMENDMENT effective as of December
28, 2012 (this "Amendment"), by and among Timothy and Thomas LLC (the "Holder"), and VG Life Sciences Inc. formally
known as Viral Genetics, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the "Company").


 


The Holder and the Company are parties to
a Convertible Debenture (See attached schedule "A") made the 19th day of October 2010 (the "Agreement"), and
the Holder and the Company desire to amend and modify the Agreement as provided for in this Amendment. See attached schedule A3.


 


The Holder and the Company realize that an orderly liquidation
of the debenture will have a maximum beneficial effect on both parties.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and legal adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:


 


1. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized
terms used in this Amendment which are not defined herein shall have the same meanings herein as are ascribed to such terms in
the Agreement.


 


2. Principal. Section 3 of the Agreement
is amended to provide that the remaining Tranches of the Note shall be paid as follows:


 


Pursuant to attached schedule "B"


 


3. Effect. Except as expressly amended
hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


 


Timothy and Thomas, LLC


 


By: /s/ signature                      


Duly Authorized Officer


 


VG Life Sciences


A Delaware corporation


 


By: /s/ signature                      


Duly Authorized Officer


 


 






    	1



    	 



    

 


SCHEDULE B


 


Release schedule base on stock price


 


Amount of convertible debt remaining under the agreement $
862,500.00


 


Price per share is defined as 15 day weighted average at closing.


 


Mandatory quarterly conversion if price per share is


$1.00 is $50,000.00 or greater as mutual agreed upon by the
parties.


 


Mandatory quarterly conversion if price per share is


$2.00 is $75,000.00 or greater as mutual agreed upon by the
parties.


 


All other term as to price, definitions, terms and option stay
the same. This schedule only effects the liquidation of the debt.


 


If the price is below a dollar then note is convertible


01/01/2020


 






    	2
No. 10-11065.

#### Mitchell Williams, Petitioner v. Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 209,

181 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6581.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 61 So. 3d 1114.
No. 11-5750.

#### Nathan Corley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 345,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7092.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 245.
```
**UNITED STATES****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**
                                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                 **FORM 10-K**

                         [ X ]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                                     THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2000

                                                     OR

                          [ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                                   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                       Commission file number 2-60372

                                          **Farmland Industries, Inc.**
                           (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
**Kansas****44-0209330**
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)          (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

**3315 North Oak Trafficway, Kansas City, Missouri****64116-0005**
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                                                          (Zip Code)

                                   Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: 816-459-6000

                                   Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

                                   Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
```

              Indicate by check mark whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports  required to be filed by  Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities  Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that the  registrant  was required to filesuch reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [ X ]  No [   ]

              Indicate by check mark if disclosure  of delinquent  filers  pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation  S-K (Section  229.405 of thischapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained,  to the best of registrant's  knowledge, in definitive proxy or informationstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [  X  ]

              Farmland  Industries,  Inc. is a  cooperative.  Its voting stock can only be held by its members.  No public market for votingstock of Farmland Industries,  Inc. is established and it is unlikely,  in the foreseeable future, that a public market for such votingstock will develop.

              Documents incorporated by reference:        None

**PART I**
No. 10-10656.

#### David W. Lagas, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 843, 132 S. Ct. 156,

181 L. Ed. 2d 72,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6305.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 76 App. Div. 3d 384, 906 N.Y.S.2d 151.
No. 10-10970.

#### Eddie Sanders, Petitioner v. Lenard Vare, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 196,

181 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6189.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-4: OTS Nos. 02497 and H-2024]


SouthBanc Shares, M.H.C., Anderson, South Carolina; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 16, 1998, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
SouthBanc Shares, M.H.C., Anderson, South Carolina, to convert to the 
stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the Southeast Regional 
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE, 
Atlanta, GA 30309.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1895 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
No. 10-10436.

#### Anthony Dawain Shaw, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 142,

181 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6166.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 771.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Santa, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(i)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 8, 2007
|        | /s/ Richard A.  Santa                       |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard A. Santa                            |   |
|   | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | of Dynamic  Materials Corporation           |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                     EXHIBIT 23.1










INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


ENSERCH Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-59259, No. 33-47911, No. 33-40589 and No. 2-77572 on Form S-8 and in
Registration Statements No. 33-15623, No. 33-52525 and No. 33-61635 of ENSERCH
Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated February 9, 1996, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENSERCH Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1995.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1996
No. 11-5352.

#### Noble L. Johnson, Petitioner v. Kansas Parole Board.

565 U.S. 903, 132 S. Ct. 300,

181 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5717.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 867.
# C_2014024EN.01003301.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Action brought on 22 November 2013 — easyGroup IP Licensing v OHIM — TUI (easyAir-tours)

(Case T-608/13)

2014/C 24/60

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: easyGroup IP Licensing Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: TUI AG (Hannover, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 September 2013 given in Case R 1029/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 September 2013 given in Case R 1029/2012-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘easyAir-tours’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 36, 39 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 220 849

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registrations designating the European Union, Community trade mark registration and national trade mark registration of a figurative mark containing inter alia the verbal element ‘airtours’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

inter alia

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the Community trade mark application in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-680.

#### Carol Howes, Warden, Petitioner v. Randall Lee Fields.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1047,

178 L. Ed. 2d 862,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 960.

January 24, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 617 F.3d 813.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1302 TP 12-01172**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF SHAMEL DAVIS, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (WILLIAM E. STORRS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered June 20, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
No. 10-10816.

#### John E. Johnson, Petitioner v. Eldon W. Vail, Secretary, Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 176,

181 L. Ed. 2d 87,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5865.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00182

- CR David Cepeda JONES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1994

- CR

- 5367W Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 13, 2011
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court imposed sentence on August 5, 1997. Assuming appellant had timely filed a motion for new trial, the latest possible date for appellant to have filed his notice of appeal was November 3, 1997. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.2(a). On February 22, 2011, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. On March 9, 2011, this court issued an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a written0 4

- 11

- 00182

- CR

- 2

- response that does not provide a b asis upon which this court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. A late notice of app eal invokes the appellate court’ s jurisdiction in a criminal case only if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal , (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within the fifteen

- day grace period, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). This court may no t extend the time to file a notice of appeal unless a motion for extension of time is filed in the appellate court within fifteen (15) days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. When a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time are not filed within the fifteen

- day grace period, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction. Id .; Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522; but see Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (an out

- of

- time appeal fro m a final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Knowledge and Abilities Catalog Revision; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NUREG-1122, ``Knowledge and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear 
Power Plant Operators: Pressurized Water Reactors,'' and NUREG-1123, 
``Knowledge and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators: 
Boiling Water Reactors,'' were developed in 1985 to assist operator 
licensing examiners in the development of content valid written and 
operating examinations to administer to reactor plant operators and 
senior operators. The Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) catalogs were 
revised in 1995 to resolve inconsistencies between the two catalogs and 
inconsistencies in content within the K/A catalogs. Revision 1 also 
incorporated evolutionary changes in the operator licensing program and 
revised definition of operator's tasks within facility licensee's 
organizations.
    The current Revision 2 incorporates corrections to the Revision 1 
catalogs that were identified during examination development associated 
with a proposed revision of 10 CFR 55 and implementation of NUREG-1021, 
Interim Rev. 8, ``Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power 
Reactors.'' Revision 2 of the respective K/A catalogs has been prepared 
for use in conjunction with the implementation of NUREG-1021, final 
Revision 8, but may be used immediately.
    Copies of NUREG-1122, Revision 2 and NUREG-1123, Revision 2 may be 
purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20013-7082. Copies are 
also available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 
Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. A copy is also available for 
inspection and/or copying for a fee in the NRC Public Document Room. 
These documents are also available at the NRC Web Site, <a href="http://
www.nrc.gov">http://
www.nrc.gov</a>. See the links under ``Technical Reports in the NUREG 
Series'' on the ``Reference Library'' page.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Collins, Mail Stop O9-D24, 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, telephone (301) 415-3173.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of July, 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard J. Eckenrode,
Acting Chief, Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch, Division 
of Reactor Controls and Human Factors, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-18958 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 11-5238.

#### Heraldo Mora, Petitioner v. William Brown, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 896, 132 S. Ct. 285,

181 L. Ed. 2d 171,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5557.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.