alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Randall W. White, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EducationalDevelopment Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s quarterlyperiod ended February 29, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2005
/s/ Randall W. White
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 04, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 04, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0097. ANTONIO BURCH v. SFT FOODS et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017S04186
#### *State, Respondent, v. Larkins, Petitioner,*

No. 91734-5.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45276-6-II, April 28, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1017. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-11072.

#### Jeffery Allen Bastedo, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 865, 132 S. Ct. 210,

181 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6400.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

*114Same case below, 49 So. 3d 752.
# C_2013189EN.01002801.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/28

---

Action brought on 8 May 2013 — Ryanair Holdings v Commission

(Case T-260/13)

2013/C 189/58

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Holdings plc (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, and D. Hull, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission C(2013) 1106 final of 27 February 2013 declaring a merger to be incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.6663 — Ryanair/Aer Lingus III); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission C(2013) 1106 final of 27 February 2013 declaring a merger to be incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.6663 — Ryanair/Aer Lingus III);

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in finding, and failed to demonstrate to the requisite legal standard, that the merger, as modified by the commitments offered by the applicant, would significantly impede effective competition in the common market. The applicant also submits that the Commission violated the principle of proportionality, the principle of sound administration, and the obligation to state reasons.

In support of its claims, the applicant pleads that the Commission made manifest errors of assessment and violated the above-mentioned principles with regard to (a) the commitments relating to the divestiture of Aer Lingus’s operations on 43 overlap routes to Flybe Group plc; (b) the commitments relating to the Dublin-London, Cork-London, and Shannon-London routes; (c) the commitments relating Aer Arann’s operation on the 43 overlap routes on which Flybe would operate, and (d) the commitments relating to the routes on which the Commission identified potential competition concerns.

---
No. 11-5319.

#### Carl A. Courtright, III, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 901, 132 S. Ct. 296,

181 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5515.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 363.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Colin O’Kroley, * From the 244th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. C-130,005-A.

Vs. No. 11-14-00114-CV * June 26, 2014

Byron Brown, Ray Pringle, Pringle * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Management Company, Jennie Holder, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

and Byron Brown Realty Corporation, Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal 

are taxed against Colin O’Kroley.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
I, Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

         (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

April 14, 2004
                                        /s/ Thomas ZurSchmiede
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer of Federal Screw Works
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                          21,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    458,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,000
<PP&E>                                         316,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,100
<BONDS>                                        245,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,000
<SALES>                                      1,381,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,381,500
<CGS>                                          748,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,313,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38


</TABLE>
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.55-1 APPENDIX 3.55

AP3.55. APPENDIX 3.55

LOGISTICS REASSIGNMENT STORAGE 

INFORMATION REPLY

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZD.

Routing Identifier Code

(TO)

4-6 Enter RIC from record positions 67-69 of 

DIC DZC to which reply is being made or

losing item manager (LIM) RIC.

Follow-up Indicator 7 LIM storage activity not in receipt of a DIC

DZC, enter A (denoting follow-up) to 

provide available asset information to the 

LIM. Otherwise, leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Perpetuate from DIC DZC. 

Unit of Issue 23-24 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Quantity (Transfer) 25-29 Enter quantity which was available for 

transfer subject to the retention quantity 

contained in record positions 76-80 of DIC

DZC.1,2

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Suffix Code 44 Enter consecutive alpha codes A through 

Z when assignment of suffix codes are 

necessary.3

Routing Identifier Code 

(Gaining)

45-47 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Multiuse 48-56 Enter data prescribed by the Component.

Project Code 57-59 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Blank 60 Leave blank.

Date

(Effective Transfer)

61-64 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Blank 65-66 Leave blank.

1 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.1.

2 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.2.

3 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.3.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.55-2 APPENDIX 3.55

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Routing Identifier Code 67-69 Enter RIC of storage activity from which 

reply is being made.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Supply Condition Code 71 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Management 72 Perpetuate from DIC DZC.

Multiuse 73-75 Enter data prescribed by the Component.

Quantity (Retention) 76-80 Enter the quantity being retained by the 

LIM.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,989-03

EX P ARTE MILTON WAYNE KAY , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D120519CR IN THE 260TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM ORANG E COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i cant was convicted of driving while in to xic a te d , e nh a n c e d w it h a prior felony conviction, and sentenc ed to nineteen year s’ imprisonme nt. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Kay v. State , No. 01-13-00595- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1 Dist.] J uly 24, 2014) (not designated f or publication). st Applicant contends that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use trial counsel failed to inform him of a seven- year plea offe r. The trial court has deter mined that t ri al counsel’s2

perf ormanc e was defic ient and that such defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. See Missouri v. Frye , ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct
. 1399 (2012). The trial cour t rec ommends g rantinghabea s relief
. The finding s and re commendation ar e supported by the habe as re cord. Relief is grante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. D120519-R in t h e 260th District Court of Ora ng e County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded t o the custody of the Sheriff of Ora ng e County to answe r the charg es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copi e s o f this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: April 6, 2016 Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         376,962                 920,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,384                  12,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (367)                   (698)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,071                   8,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,337                 974,777
<PP&E>                                         195,323                 274,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,071                  33,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,424               1,306,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,178                  97,701
<BONDS>                                        505,696                 818,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            78                      79
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,209                (87,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,424               1,306,394
<SALES>                                          2,300                  20,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,300                  20,309
<CGS>                                           18,170                  90,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,084                 245,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,401)                (16,933)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,372                  49,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,755)               (257,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,755)               (257,688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,755)               (257,688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.97)                  (3.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.97)                  (3.62)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Allen Dodge, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of Health
Grades, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment to the annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this amendment to the annual report.


Date: May 7, 2004

/s/ Allen Dodge
-----------------------------------
Senior Vice President - Finance/CFO
No. 10-10743.

#### Trent Carr, Jr., Petitioner v. Millicent Warren, Warden.

565 U.S. 847, 132 S. Ct. 166,

181 L. Ed. 2d 79,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5958.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s)

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Melinda Wharton (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

11:15 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines

Introduction

Updates on vaccine effectiveness of COVID-19 booster dose

Updates on safety of COVID-19 booster dose

VaST assessment

Dr. Matthew Daley (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Ruth Link-Gelles (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Nicky Klein (KPNC), Dr. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC/NCEZID)

Dr. Keipp Talbot (ACIP, VaST Chair)

12:25 Break

12:40 Updates to the EtR Framework: COVID-19 vaccine booster doses 

in adults ≥50 years of age and immunocompromised individuals

CDC guidance for second COVID-19 booster dose

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Elisha Hall (CDC/NCIRD)

2:00 Break

2:15 Public Comment

2:45 Summary of FDA advisory committee meeting on future COVID

19 booster doses

Framework for future COVID-19 doses and next steps

- Dr. Doran Fink (FDA)

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

4:00 Adjourn

CDC

CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019

EtR Evidence to Recommendations Framework

FDA Food and Drug Administration

GRADE

HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration

IHS Indian Health Service

NCHHSTP

NCIRD

NCEZID

NIAID

OIDP Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy

SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

WG Work Group

WHO World Health Organization

VaST COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Work Group

VE Vaccine Effectiveness

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/OID]

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Acronyms

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

11:00 Welcome & Introductions

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

April 20, 2022

AGENDA ITEM
No. 11-50.

#### Alto Eldorado Partnership, et al., Petitioners v. Santa Fe County, New Mexico, et al.

565 U.S. 880, 132 S. Ct. 246,

181 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5378.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1170.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.24. APPENDIX 3.24**

**LOGISTICS REASSIGNMENT ON-HAND ASSET DATA[footnoteRef:1]** [1:  The DIC DLU records convey the total onhand wholesale assets.  The records provide the individual quantities, by ownership/purpose and supply condition, at each storage activity.  The sum of all assets reported for individual locations are to equal the total quantity in record positions 32-41.  When an individual quantity is entered, the routing identifier code, ownership/purpose code, and supply condition code for that quantity must be entered; otherwise all four fields are left blank.] 

## 

4

**AP3.24-**

AP3.24-1

APPENDIX 3.24
EX-10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 
  

casella 
 waste systems inc

 25 greens hill lane 
 rutland,
vermont 05701 
 (802) 775-0325 

(802) 775-6198 fax 
  

April 23, 2013 
 John W. Casella 

Casella Associates, Inc, 
 25 Greens Hill Lane 

Rutland, VT 05701 
  

	 	Re:	Extension of Lease Agreements 

 Dear John, 

The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of the following lease agreements in place between Casella Associates, Inc., and Casella Waste
Management, Inc. (“CWM”): 
 Lease Agreement dated August 1, 1993, and amended on December 9, 1994, and March 13, 2008, for
property located in Montpelier, Vermont 
 Lease Agreement dated August 1, 1993, and amended on November 20, 1997, and March 13, 2008, for
property located in Rutland, Vermont 
 As set forth the Amendment to Lease Agreement dated March 13, 2008, Section 2 was amended to update the initial term
through April 30, 2013. CWM has the option to extend the initial term for two (2) successive five (5) year periods by giving written notice not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the initial term. CWM requests that you waive notice
requirement and extend the lease for next five (5) year period beginning April 30, 2013 and extending through April 30, 2018. 
 Your signature below
constitutes approval of the waiver request and the five (5) year extension of both lease agreements. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,
  

Casella Waste Management, Inc.

	
	/s/ Edmond Coletta
	Edmond Coletta, Vice President

  
  

	
	ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
	
	/s/ John W. Casella
	John W. Casella