alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy R. Yost, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Corporate Executive Board Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: May 9, 2008
#### *State, Respondent, v. Strong, Petitioner,*

No. 92262-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46318-1-II, August 18, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1038. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.43-1 APPENDIX 3.43

AP3.43. APPENDIX 3.43

REPLY TO MATERIEL RECEIPT FOLLOW-UP

OTHER THAN PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT 

SOURCE

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DXD.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point to 

which the receipt will be reported.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of item to be 

received.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of the item to be received.

Quantity 25-29 Enter quantity to be received, preceding 

significant digits with zeros.1

Document Number 30-43 Enter controlling document number.

Suffix 44 Enter controlling suffix code; otherwise, 

leave blank.

Supplementary 

Address 

45-50 Enter SUPADD; otherwise, leave blank. 

Signal 51 Enter signal code; otherwise, leave blank.

Fund 52-53 Enter fund code; otherwise, leave blank.

Distribution 54-56 Enter the distribution code; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Project 57-59 Enter project code; otherwise, leave blank.

Unit Price 60-66 Enter vendor shipment number, if known; 

otherwise, leave blank.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM) 

67-69 Enter RIC of the storage activity which is to 

receive the item.

Ownership/Purpose 70 Enter ownership/purpose code of the item to 

be received.

1See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.1.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.43-2 APPENDIX 3.43

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Supply Condition 71 Enter SCC of the item to be received.

Management 72 Enter management code; otherwise, leave 

blank.

Date Indicator 

(Estimated Delivery)

73-75 Enter the last digit of calendar year and twodigit month signifying estimated delivery 

date, e.g., 307 means 2003, month of July.2

Blank 76-80 Leave blank.

2 See Appendix AP3 - Formats Introduction, paragraph AP3.3.4.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-46-001]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective 
July 1, 1998.

Substitute Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5200

    Koch states that it is submitting the above tariff sheet to restore 
language inadvertently changed in its June 2, 1998 tariff filing to 
comply with the letter order issued.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18177 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-11200.

#### Alexander Harvin, Petitioner v. Healthcare Funding Solutions, et al.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 227,

181 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6391.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*127Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 180.
No. 11-5742.

#### Trasbin Tobias Campbell, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 345,

181 L. Ed. 2d 216,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7115.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON 

WASHINGTON , DC 20301-1000 

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL MILITARY PERSONNEL AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

EMPLOYEES 

SUBJECT: Reaffirming Our Commitment to Ethical Conduct 

All ofus in the Department of Defense enjoy the highest trust and confidence of the 

American people because we live by core values grounded in duty and honor that influence how 

we think and act. The decisions that we make every day must reaffirm our commitment to 

ethical conduct - doing what is right, without hesitation. 

The threats we face, the character of warfare, and the way the Department conducts 

business are evolving. Our National Defense Strategy focuses our efforts in an increasingly 

complex global security environment, and ethics is integral to our three lines of effort. Ethical 

leadership that builds principled, self-disciplined teams strengthens readiness and improves 

lethality. Our shared ethical values strengthen alliances and attract new partners. Ethics-based 

standards and accountability are fundamental to business reforms, and to keeping faith with our 

Service Members and their families. 

A commitment to exemplary ethics must be a personal creed. I expect every member of 

the Department to continue to aim beyond compliance with basic standards. As leaders, 

teammates, and colleagues, we must inspire each other by setting an example, rejecting any 

sense of personal entitlement, and never abusing our position or our privilege of service. We 

must be willing to choose the harder virtue over the easier vice. 

Each ofus takes a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution. The Department's 

mission imparts a special responsibility on each of us to serve with the utmost integrity and be 

vigilant in protecting the duties and confidences with which we have been entrusted. 

To ensure we are ready to do what is right when ethical dilemmas arise, we must train 

and prepare ourselves. As such, I expect Department leaders to be personally involved in 

training their organizations. Talk about examples of ethical decision-making, good and bad. 

Make these conversations a natural part of your meetings and engagement with your personnel. 

Create an open, transparent environment that reinforces values-based decision-making and 

action. And always treat everyone with dignity and respect. 

I am proud of the great work our Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, Airmen, and civilians do 

each and every day around the globe. Stay focused on your mission, remain steadfast in your 

pursuit of excellence, and always travel the honorable path. Together, we will remain the most 

ready and capable military force that our Nation expects and deserves.
DLM 4000.25-2, June 13, 2012

AP3.17-1 APPENDIX 3.17

AP3.17. APPENDIX 3.17

REPLY TO LOGISTICS TRANSFER/

DECAPITALIZATION FOLLOW-UP

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DLB.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the gaining item manager 

(GIM) to which this transaction is being 

forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Perpetuate from follow-up transaction.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item.

Blank 25-29 Leave blank.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from follow-up transaction.

Blank 44-64 Leave blank.

Asset Transfer 65-66 Enter appropriate code from appendix 

AP2.10.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the losing item manager (LIM)

preparing this reply.

Blank 70-80 Leave blank.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

      I, Eugene O'Donovan, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc. hereby certify that (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2002 filed by
Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc.

Dated: September 16, 2002      By: /s/ Eugene O'Donovan
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                       Eugene O'Donovan, President, Chief
                                   Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                 Page 30 of 30
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.6. APPENDIX 3.6**

**DISPOSAL SHIPMENT CONFIRMATION FOLLOW-UP**

AP8.6.1.  The following entries shall apply when shipment status has been received from a shipping activity by DLA Disposition Services on shipments to DLA Disposition Services Field Offices:

AP8.6.2.  The following entries shall apply when shipment status has not been received from a shipping activity by DLA Disposition Services on shipments to DLA Disposition Services Field Offices:

AP8.6.3.  DIC AFX/AFZ Routing Instructions:

	AP8.6.3.1.  DLA Disposition Services shall generate DIC AFX/AFZs with rp 4-6 always blank.

	AP8.6.3.2.  Defense Automatic Addressing System  (DAAS) shall route DIC AFX/AFZs to rp 4-6 or to rp 30-35 if rp 4-6 are blank.

	AP8.6.3.3.  Inventory Control Points (ICP)/Integrated Material Managers (IMM) receiving DIC AFX/AFZs (based on the entry in rp 30-35) shall:

		AP8.6.3.3.1.  Enter the shipping activity RIC in rp 4-6 of the DIC AFX/AFZ and route them to the shipping activity via DAAS for the shipping activity to answer directly to DLA Disposition Services using DIC ASZ; or

		AP8.6.3.3.2.  Perform research with the shipping activity in order to provide either an ICP/IMM or storage activity DIC ASZ answer to DLA Disposition Services.

*2*

APPENDIX 3.6

AP8.6-1

APPENDIX 8.6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ending August 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  596,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    725,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,474,867
<PP&E>                                       1,680,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 853,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,812,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,101,229
<BONDS>                                        728,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,071
<COMMON>                                       451,804
<OTHER-SE>                                     360,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,812,774
<SALES>                                      8,617,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,775,046
<CGS>                                        8,245,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,299,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 3, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-680

Lower Tribunal No. 20-7960

________________

Mickgolden, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Victory Capital Group, LLC, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.

The Belleh Law Group, PLLC, and Owei Z. Belleh (Fort Lauderdale), 

for appellant.

Taylor Espino Vega, PLLC, and Timothy S. Taylor and Vanessa A. Van 

Cleaf, for appellee Oreola, LLC; Cohen, Norris, Wolmer, Ray, Telepman, 

Berkowitz & Cohen, and James S. Telepman (North Palm Beach), for 

appellee Victory Capital Group, LLC.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Christopher Westad, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Able Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 14, 2003



/s/ Christopher Westad
------------------------------
Name: Christopher Westad
Title: President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
No. 10-11021.

#### David Murillo-Betancourt, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 203,

181 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6291.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 685.
DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia

Jamie “Jay” Sternadel

Deputy Director

Jamie (Jay) Sternadel is a native of Texas who has worked globally throughout 

his career for Defense Logistics Agency Distribution. He served in the Navy 

from 1995-1999 and began his career with DLA Distribution as a quality 

assurance evaluator in 2010. 

He then became a supply systems analyst at DLA Distribution Guam, Marianas, 

before branching out to DLA Distribution Europe in Germersheim, Germany, 

in January 2013. At DDDE, he served as the primary operations analyst. 

In October of 2014, Sternadel moved to DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, 

Texas, where he served as the retail program manager and supervisory supply 

management specialist. 

Returning to the Pacific in June 2016, Sternadel worked as a contracting officer’s representative at DLA Distribution 

Guam. In November 2017, he moved to Sasebo, Japan, to serve as the DLA Distribution Yokosuka Site Sasebo 

director and was promoted to the position of DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, deputy commander in September 

2019.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.47-1 APPENDIX 3.47

AP3.47. APPENDIX 3.47

SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT SUBSTITUTE 

ITEM ACCEPTANCE

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DYG.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the Inventory Control Point to 

which this transaction is being forwarded.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Perpetuate from Special Program 

Requirement (SPR) status.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Quantity 25-29 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Suffix 44 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Multiuse 51-56 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Project 57-59 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Coast Designation 60 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Blank 61 Leave blank.

Date Indicator 

(Support)

62-64 Perpetuate from SPR request/modifier.

Advice 65-66 Perpetuate from SPR request.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM) 

67-69 Enter RIC identifying the activity submitting 

the acceptance transaction.

Purpose 70 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Supply Condition 71 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter the ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which the transaction is prepared.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.47-2 APPENDIX 3.47

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Generic Submission 76 Perpetuate from SPR status.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank.
No. 10-10455.

#### Porter Major, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6081.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10448.

#### Daniel Rashead Johnson, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6114.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office, denied.

Same case below, 6 A.3d 571.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6376

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLODOALDO FAUSTINO SALAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-12-MU)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clodoaldo Faustino Salas, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller,

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Salas’ claim that his sentence is not proper in light of the

rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is

without merit. We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247

F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi

is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.

2

PER CURIAM:

Clodoaldo Faustino Salas seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying in part his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* See United States v. Salas, No. CR93-12-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10-10956.

#### Jose Cristobal Cardona, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 932, 132 S. Ct. 376,

181 L. Ed. 2d 238,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6256.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 448.
No. 10-231.

#### Kenneth L. Gray, Petitioner v. General Electric Company.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 474,

178 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8094.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.