alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.25 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.25 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.25 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.25 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report, dated February 20, 1997, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements (as amended, as applicable) File Numbers 33-4041,
33-9570, 33-12119, 33-15680, 33-37827, 33-56762, 33-65123, 33-83402, 333-07413,
333-10919, and 333-10965.




                                      /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Diego, California
March 26 , 1997
# San Joaquin’s Paredes awarded for outstanding customer service

/ Published Oct. 3, 2023
TRACY, Calif., 
Lead Information, Ticketing and Registration Recreation Specialist Cynthia (Cindy) Paredes assigned to Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management at San Joaquin received the 2023 Morale, Welfare and Recreation Facility and Program Excellence Individual award for Outstanding Customer Service.

Paredes’ high level of customer service has put the San Joaquin ITR establishment at the forefront resulting in a dramatic increase of sales and patronage in fiscal year 2023. With strict accountability in the areas of ticket sales and store inventory, and within the Outdoor Recreation program and services, her efforts have led to an increase in attraction and destination ticket sales as well as store sales of over $1.5 million, with over a 17% increase from the previous year’s record breaking numbers in the lifetime of the program.

Her high standards of service and customer focused approach has created a positive experience for all ITR patrons resulting in customers referred by repeat customers. Under her program management, online tickets sales have increased and cut the overall ticket purchasing time, proving to be more convenient to the customer.

A key area of her program is communications both through email and social media making customers aware to ticket prices, merchandise and specials. Further, she performs her job in addition to taking on the travel clerk position saving over $60,000 in annual labor costs.

A highlight of her performance was being individually recognized by the Disney Business Relations Manager during March. The ITR store sold 489 tickets totaling $85,779.84, which was 10th overall in Disneyland Resort ticket sales out of 126 Military Ticket Program/NAVY affiliated installations.

Her supervisor David Sturman, Business and Recreation chief, holds her in high regard. “Since coming over to the ITR program from the Child Development Center in 2021, Mrs. Paredes has had great success within the ITR program, especially within the destination and attraction tickets sales,” said Sturman. “She truly has a love for what she is doing and the customers she is serving every day.”

Paredes will be honored at the DLA 56th Annual Employee Recognition Program taking place in January of 2024 at the McNamara Auditorium, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia.
No. 10-1502.

#### APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Petitioner v. Navinta LLC.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 115,

181 L. Ed. 2d 39,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5450.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

*40Same case below, 625 F.3d 1359.
# Medical employee performs Heimlich, saves choking co-worker

/ Published June 29, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Kenneth Cummings was working at his desk June 22 when he heard some choking noises.

Up until that point, Arthur Tehson had been enjoying what he thought was a creme doughnut, leftover from a coworker’s baby shower earlier in the day.

The two Medical supply chain employees have sat in the same cubicle aisle since Cummings started at Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support in March 2015. Cummings is in the Pathways to Career Excellence program and works in prime vendor order fulfillment.

Tehson is a tailored vendor logistics specialist and started in 1983 as a supply cataloger.

They said they greet each other every morning and say good night at the end of each day. When Cummings heard the choking noises, he stood up, turned around and saw Tehson with his hands clutching his throat.

Cummings learned the Heimlich maneuver during his 20-year Army career and while working as a corrections officer after retiring from the military.

Before his emergency response, Cummings said he thought to himself, “If you’re going to do something, do it right.”

Cummings got behind Tehson, joined his hands on Tehson’s chest, under the diaphragm, and thrusted them upward. The doughnut turned out to have an apple filling, which Tehson hadn’t expected.

Once Cummings heard Tehson gasp for air and knew he was OK, he stopped the Heimlich and sat back down at his desk. He started to type on his keyboard but his hands were shaking.

Cummings was back to work before Tehson knew who saved him.

Tehson said he was thankful that Cummings acted quickly.

“I’m grateful Kenneth was there and was trained,” Tehson said.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 29, 1998.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 22, 1998 
to be assured of consideration.

SPECIAL REQUEST: In order to conduct the focus group interviews 
described below as soon as possible, the Department of the Treasury is 
requesting that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and 
approve this information collection by July 10, 1998. To obtain a copy 
of this study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance 
Officer at the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: M:SP:V 98-018-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Schedule D Focus Groups.
    Description: A significant number of taxpayers who should have 
attached Schedule D (Form 1040) to their tax return did not do so, 
resulting in the necessity of corresponding with the taxpayer to 
request the missing schedule, inconveniencing the taxpayer and 
increasing processing costs. The Tax Forms and Publications Division 
would like to meet with some of the taxpayers, to find out what 
differences in the forms or instructions might have led them to attach 
the schedule. This will be useful in creating forms and instructions 
for next year, both in relating to the Schedule D issue, and in 
communicating any future tax law changes.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 2 hours, 34 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one-time only).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 70 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17873 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 11-5044.

#### James L. Phelps, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 262,

181 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5358.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
No. 10-10834.

#### Billy Jett Brown, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 852, 132 S. Ct. 178,

181 L. Ed. 2d 89,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6547.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
#### *Riley-Hordyk, Petitioner, v. Bethel Sch. Dist., Respondent,*

No. 91840-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45830-6-II, May 19, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 748. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 10-7355.

#### Martin Allen Ashbaugh, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1151, 131 S. Ct. 938,

178 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 263.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan III

Thomas L. Monahan IIIChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2007/s/ Timothy R. Yost

Timothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2007
****

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP7. APPENDIX 7**

**DATA ELEMENTS AND CODES INDEX**

4

APPENDIX 3

AP7AP7-2

APPENDIX 7
No. 10-10566.

#### David Joseph Sheehan, Petitioner v. Michelle Ricci, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

565 U.S. 840, 132 S. Ct. 151,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6107.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3185 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3185

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Defense 
  Language Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign 
                   language, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2019

 Mr. Panetta (for himself, Mr. Crow, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
   Kim, Mr. Young, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Cisneros, and Mr. Price of North 
  Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Defense 
  Language Institute to award a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign 
                   language, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Language Improvement Act'' 
or the ``DLI Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER.

    (a) Authority To Award Bachelor's Degrees.--Section 2168 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``Associate'' and 
        inserting ``Associate or Bachelor''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
    ``(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of the Defense 
Language Institute may confer--
            ``(1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign language 
        upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the 
        Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree; or
            ``(2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language upon 
        any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute 
        who fulfills the requirements for that degree.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 108 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 2168 and inserting the following new item:

``2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of 
                            Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign 
                            language.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020077EN.01000201.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central — Spain) — Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA

(Case C-274/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ - Criteria - Independence of the national body concerned - Irremovability of the members - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(2020/C 77/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central

Party to the main proceedings

Banco de Santander SA

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central (Central Tax Tribunal, Spain), made by decision of 2 April 2014, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

---
No. 10-7879.

#### Robert Beale, John Howard Pelton, and Frederick Ogan Bond, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1190, 131 S. Ct. 1023,

178 L. Ed. 2d 847,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 896.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 620 F.3d 856.
No. 10-1373.

#### Eliahu Yecheskel, et ux., Petitioners v. Bank of America Corporation, et al.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 101,

181 L. Ed. 2d 29,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6713.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 738.
EXHIBIT31.3

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTINGOFFICER

I, Anthony Gentile, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofTBS International Limited and its subsidiaries (the"Registrant") as of June 30, 2005;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c) disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant's registeredindependent public accounting firm and the audit committee of theRegistrant's board of directors:

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controlover financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ AnthonyGentile                                        Anthony Gentile Controller, Chief AccountingOfficer

----
No. 11-5186.

#### Blanca Virgen, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 279,

181 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5671.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 500.
#### *City of Burlington, Respondent, v. Singh et al., Petitioners,*

No. 91867-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72438-0-I, May 26, 2015 26,2015,187 187 Wn. App. 853. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
# C_2014071EN.01000702.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 5 December 2013 — Cajas Rurales Unidas, Sociedad Cooperativa de Crédito v Evaristo Méndez Sena and Others

(Case C-645/13)

(2014/C 71/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cajas Rurales Unidas, Sociedad Cooperativa de Crédito

Defendants: Evaristo Méndez Sena, Edelmira Pérez Vicente, Daniel Méndez Sena, Victoriana Pérez Bicéntez

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the legislation of a Member State under which no provision is made for a right of appeal to a higher court in the event of the dismissal of an application, made in the course of mortgage enforcement proceedings, to have a contractual term disapplied on the ground that it is unfair, be interpreted as failing to provide adequate and effective means to prevent the continued use of unfair terms in contracts concluded with consumers by sellers or suppliers, and as failing to observe the right to take action before the competent national courts for a decision as to whether contractual terms drawn up for general use are unfair, so that those courts can apply appropriate and effective means to prevent the continued use of such terms? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the legislation of a Member State under which no provision is made for a right of appeal to a higher court in the event of the dismissal of an application, made in the course of mortgage enforcement proceedings, to have a contractual term disapplied on the ground that it is unfair, be interpreted as failing to provide adequate and effective means to prevent the continued use of unfair terms in contracts concluded with consumers by sellers or suppliers, and as failing to observe the right to take action before the competent national courts for a decision as to whether contractual terms drawn up for general use are unfair, so that those courts can apply appropriate and effective means to prevent the continued use of such terms?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, may the national court — in order to ensure that consumers are adequately and effectively protected against unfair contractual terms — of its own motion grant a consumer the right to have a higher court review the decision at first instance dismissing the application by that consumer to have a contractual term disapplied on the ground that it is unfair? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, may the national court — in order to ensure that consumers are adequately and effectively protected against unfair contractual terms — of its own motion grant a consumer the right to have a higher court review the decision at first instance dismissing the application by that consumer to have a contractual term disapplied on the ground that it is unfair?

---