alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014112EN.01003101.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2014 — Anapurna v OHIM — Annapurna (ANNAPURNA)

(Case T-71/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark ANNAPURNA - Application for annulment filed by the intervener - Article 134(1) to (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form of use of the trade mark - Proof of use for the registered goods))

2014/C 112/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Anapurna GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Annapurna SpA (Prato, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2012 (Case R 2409/2011 5), relating to revocation proceedings between Anapurna GmbH and Annapurna SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Rejects Annapurna SpA’s application for annulment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rejects Annapurna SpA’s application for annulment;

| 3. | Orders Anapurna GmbH to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by Annapurna SpA; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Anapurna GmbH to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by Annapurna SpA;

| 4. | Orders Annapurna SpA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Annapurna SpA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
No. 10-1506.

#### Dean Lee Rector, Petitioner v. Shirlee Harry Warren, Warden.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 116,

181 L. Ed. 2d 40,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5258.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6419
JAMES OUTLAW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAR OLINA; CHARLES H. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-3827-3-22BC) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the order of the magistrate judge granting Respondents an extension of time in which to respond to Appellant's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appealas interlocutory. We deny as moot Appellant's motion for bail pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016287EN.01000201.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-205/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Air transport - Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 - Allocation of slots at European Union airports - Article 4(2) - Independence of the coordinator - Concept of ‘interested party’ - Airport managing body - Functional separation - System of financing))

(2016/C 287/02)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and F. Wilman, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and V. Moura Ramos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to ensure that the coordinator for the allocation of slots is independent by separating the coordinator functionally from any single interested party and by failing to ensure that the system of financing the coordinator’s activities is such as to guarantee the coordinator’s independent status, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to ensure that the coordinator for the allocation of slots is independent by separating the coordinator functionally from any single interested party and by failing to ensure that the system of financing the coordinator’s activities is such as to guarantee the coordinator’s independent status, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.

1

---
# DLA Aviation employees remember 9/11: Roy Drake

/ Published Sept. 9, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
*In commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Public Affairs Office is running a week-long series Sept. 6-11 telling the stories of DLA Aviation employees who remember where they were and what they were doing that fateful day.*

**Name:**Roy Drake

**Organization:**DLA Aviation, Richmond, Virginia

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**I’m the deputy chief for the Customer Operations Directorate’s Marine Corps Customer Facing Division. I lead and manage teams supporting the mission, multiple military weapon systems, and tactical, operational and strategic military customers.

**Please tell where you were and what you were doing on Sept. 11, 2001.**On September 11, 2001, I was sitting on my bed in lodging in Monterey, California, preparing to move my family into housing around the end of my first semester at the Naval Postgraduate School.  As I was reading my emails, I realized that my family was glued to the TV. I realized after looking at the TV, the events on 9/11 were happening and were very tragic.

I felt an overwhelming desire to do something, so I sent an email to my counselor at the school and told him that if there were any opportunities to deploy and serve in a logistics capacity, I was willing to go. My family fully supported it. The next morning, there were a lot of students in my counselor’s office requesting to deploy as well. Shortly thereafter, I executed orders to Bahrain under the Joint Forces Maritime Component Command in October 2001. I served six months between my first and second semesters of Naval Postgraduate School.

While in Bahrain, the Naval Central Command Logistics Readiness Cell was established in support of 9/11 efforts, and I served as a section watch captain and logistics team lead. I returned to the U.S. after six months, then visited “ground zero” in New York City, and ultimately returned to Naval Postgraduate School to complete my Master’s in Business Administration. 

**What can we do to ensure future generations never forget that fateful day?**Convey value-added documentaries and show the history and events of 9/11 via electronic mechanisms/venues that future generations will be interested in viewing or reading. A visit to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum in New York City would be another recommendation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17655]

[[Page 36259]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW126395]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

June 18, 1998.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (3), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW126395 for lands in Weston County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination. The lease has agreed to the amended lease terms for 
rentals and royalties at rates $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per 
year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW126395 effective March 1, 1998, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 98-17655 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.05 MB)
 
 DLA Chief of Staff
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.05 MB)
 
 DLA Chief of Staff
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.05 MB)
 
 DLA Chief of Staff
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.05 MB)
 
 DLA Chief of Staff
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Print Only
No. 10-709.

#### Jane E. Bentley, Petitioner v. Atlantic County, New Jersey, et al.

562 U.S. 1180, 131 S. Ct. 1020,

178 L. Ed. 2d 829,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 808.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 205.
No. 10-10856.

#### James Wesley Reddix, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 181,

181 L. Ed. 2d 91,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6012.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S.
Steven Singh, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 9, 2007



By

/s/ S. Steven SinghS. Steven SinghChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 10-11091.

#### William Vinton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 866, 132 S. Ct. 213,

181 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6792.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*116Same case below, 631 F.3d 476.
No. 10-7541.

#### Anthony Threatt, Petitioner v. Terri Arredia, et al.

562 U.S. 1186, 131 S. Ct. 1012,

178 L. Ed. 2d 840,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 714.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10269.

#### Gary J. Karpin, Sr., Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 132,

181 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5341.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.61-1 APPENDIX 3.61

AP3.61. APPENDIX 3.61

TRANSACTION HISTORY TRANSMITTAL1

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DZK.

Routing Identifier 

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of the activity to which the 

transaction is being forwarded.

Type of Physical 

Inventory/Transaction 

History

7 Perpetuate from the DIC DZJ Transaction 

History Request; otherwise, enter code W 

for automatic submission of transaction 

history.

Other Fields 8-29 Perpetuate from source document.2

Document Number 30-43 When record position 7 of the DIC DZJ 

request is W and the storage activity has no 

transactions for the stock or part number 

requested for the dates specified in record 

positions 25-31, but transactions are available 

since the date of last location reconciliation, 8-

fill this field; when no transactions are 

available for the dates specified or since the 

date of last reconciliation, 9-fill this field. 

When record position 7 is X and the storage 

activity has no transactions for the dates 

specified, 9-fill this field; otherwise, perpetuate 

from the source document.

Other Fields 44-50 Perpetuate from source document.

Blank 51 Leave blank.

Fund 52-53 Perpetuate from source document.

Source Document 

Identifier Code

54-56 Enter DIC from record positions 1-3 of the 

source document.

Lot/Segment Number 57-59 Enter the lot/segment number for controlling 

the inventory/reconciliation; otherwise, leave 

blank.

1 May be used intra-Component or inter-Component when agreed to by the Components involved.

2All references to the source document relate to the document on the storage activity transaction 

history file; e.g., D4_, D6_, D7_, D8_, D9_.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.61-2 APPENDIX 3.61

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Contract Shipment 

Number

60-66 Perpetuate from source document.

Routing Identifier 

Code (FROM) 

67-69 Enter RIC of the activity from which the 

transaction is being forwarded.

Other Fields 70 Perpetuate from source document.

Supply Condition 71 When record positions 30-43 of the DIC 

DZK are 8- or 9-filled, enter the applicable

SCC; otherwise perpetuate from the source 

document.

Other fields 72 Perpetuate from the source document.

Ordinal Date 73-76 Enter the date on which the source 

document was entered on the storage 

activity record.

Blank 77-80 Leave blank.
No. 10-1322.

#### DIRECTV, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Richard A. Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio.

565 U.S. 809, 132 S. Ct. 82,

181 L. Ed. 2d 13,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7005.

October 3, 2011.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Same case below, 128 Ohio St. 3d 68, 941 N.E.2d 1187.
No. 10-10752.

#### Thomas Hawkins, III, Petitioner v. California, et al.

565 U.S. 847, 132 S. Ct. 167,

181 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6420,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George Kazantzis, President (President and Principal Financial Officer) and Nicholas Pappas (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 16th day of February 2005.

/s/ George Kazantzis
  Name: George Kazantzis
  Title: President (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Nicholas Pappas
  Name: Nicholas Pappas
  Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeMediaQuiz

# Quizzes

## Test your knowledge of the Defense Logistics Agency

1

1

Return to the main Quiz page...

                      - Contact Us
                      - Site Index
                      - Strategic Plan
                      - DLA IG Hotline
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - DLA Careers
                      - Images
                      - Webmaster
                      - EEO
                      - Section 508
                      - Public Affairs
                      - SAPR
                      - External Links Disclaimer
                      - DOD Information Quality Guidelines
                      - Privacy/Security
                      - USA.gov
                      - DOD Web Policy
                      - DOD Open Government
                      - Plain Language

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil