alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 1, 2010
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Certifications**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Michael Binney, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

Date: July 29, 2020 

 
/s/ Michael Binney
Michael Binney

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. andwill be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
*DoD 4000.25-1-M, April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, April 09, 2022*

*Change 14*

**AP6.3. APPENDIX 6.3**

***Reserved***

***1***

APPENDIX 1.3

AP6.3-1

APPENDIX 6.3
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 312 

To reaffirm the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe reservation, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. KEATING (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, and Mr. COLE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe reservation, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mashpee Wampanoag 

5 Tribe Reservation Reaffirmation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The taking of land into trust by 

8 the United States for the benefit of the Mashpee 

9 Wampanoag Tribe of Massachusetts as described in the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 312 IH

1 final Notice of Reservation Proclamation (81 Fed. Reg. 

2 948; January 8, 2016) is reaffirmed as trust land and the 

3 actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking that land 

4 into trust are ratified and confirmed. 

5 (b) APPLICATION.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, an action (including an action pending in a 

7 Federal court as of the date of enactment of this Act) re8 lating to the land described in subsection (a) shall not be 

9 filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 

10 promptly dismissed. 

11 (c) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including 

12 regulations) of the United States of general applicability 

13 to Indians or nations, Indian Tribes, or bands of Indians 

14 (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 5101 et 

15 seq.)), shall be applicable to the Tribe and Tribal mem16 bers, except that to the extent such laws and regulations 

17 are inconsistent with the terms of the Intergovernmental 

18 Agreement, dated April 22, 2008, by and between the 

19 Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Town of Mashpee, 

20 Massachusetts, the terms of that Intergovernmental 

21 Agreement shall control. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 3. |  | This annual report on Form 10-K of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. |  | The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 29, 2004



/s/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-10958.

#### Kelvin Summers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 195,

181 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6138.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*102Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 838.
# Figure

Year

Percentage
AP5.25 APPENDIX 5.25 

CONTRACT CLOSEOUT EXTENSION 

Record 

Data Element Name position!^) 

Document Identifier 1 -3 

PllN 4-1 6 

Data Entries 

PKZ. 

Must match the contract number to which it 

applies. 

Purchasing Office (4-9) 

Fiscal Year (10-1 1) 

Type of Instrument (12) 

Serial Number (I 3-1 6) 

SPIIN: 17-22 

CallIOrder Modification (2 1 -22) 

Number 

A six-position DFARS, appendix G code. 

Alphanumeric. Normally, numeric, except 

when X-overpunched for cancellation. 

A, C-H, K-M, P, S, V, or W. 

Rp 13-1 6: 0001 -9999; 

or rp 13: A-Z and rp 14-1 6: 001 -999; 

or rp 13-1 4: AA-ZZ and rp 15-1 6: 01 -99. 

I and 0 cannot be used. 

When required, it must match the master file 

for this procurement instrument. 

If the Type of Instrument in rp 12 is A, D, or 

G, then rp 17-20 is four positions, 

alphanumeric. Otherwise, leave blank. 

When applicable, must be any combination of 

alphanumerics. I and 0 cannot be used. 

Contract Modification (1 7-22) 

Number 

When applicable, if the Type of lnstrument in 

rp 12 is other than A, D, or G, then rp 17 

must contain A or P and rp 18-22 must be 

alphanumeric. 

Identity Code: 23-28 

Administered By 

Identity Code: 29-34 

Purchasing Office 

Must be a valid DoDAAC. 

Must be a valid DoDAAC.
No. 10-10920.

#### Marcus L. Wallace, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6246.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 615.
No. 10-10478.

#### Morris Miller, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 838, 132 S. Ct. 146,

181 L. Ed. 2d 63,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6026.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.38. APPENDIX 3.38**

**PRE-POSITIONED MATERIEL RECEIPT – PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT SOURCE**

## 

**AP3.42-**

AP3.38-1

APPENDIX 3.38
WHOOPING

COUGH (PERTUSSIS)

A contagious disease that can be 

deadly for babies

WHOOPING COUGH 

CAN BE DANGEROUS

Especially for newborns

and babies 

Whooping cough

can lead to...

PNEUMONIA

(A SERIOUS LUNG INFECTION)

CONVULSIONS

BRAIN DAMAGE

APNEA

DEATH

About half of babies 

younger than 1 year old 

who get whooping 

cough are hospitalized.

SYMPTOMS OF 

WHOOPING COUGH

LOW-GRADE

FEVER

VOMITING

DURING OR AFTER

COUGHING FITS

APNEA

BABIES MAY

HAVE A PAUSE

IN BREATHING

EXHAUSTION

AFTER 

COUGHING FITS

RUNNY 

NOSE

PAROXYSMS

COUGHING FITS

FOLLOWED BY A

HIGH-PITCHED

“WHOOP”

BABIES MAY

HAVE LITTLE 

OR NO COUGH

WHOOPING COUGH

IS HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS

Here’s how it’s spread...

COUGHING &

SNEEZING

SHARING 

BREATHING

SPACE

WHOOPING COUGH 

IN THE UNITED STATES

Since 2010, we see between 10,000 and 50,000 cases of 

whooping cough each year in the United States. Cases, which 

include people of all ages, are reported in every state.

PROTECT YOUR CHILD

Make sure your child gets all 5 doses of the DTaP 

vaccine to help protect him against whooping cough,

diphtheria and tetanus...

DOSE #1

2 months

DOSE #2

4 months

DOSE #3

6 months

DOSE #4

15–18 months

DOSE #5

4–6 years

Pregnant women should get the whooping 

cough vaccine during each pregnancy to 

help protect their newborns until they get 

DTaP vaccine at 2 months old.

IMMUNIZATION. 

POWER TO PROTECT.

Learn more at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents

NOVEMBER 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TITAN CORPORATION

                                                                  State of
Name                                                         Incorporation
----                                                       or Jurisdiction
                                                           ---------------
Advanced Communication Systems, Inc................               Delaware
Assist Cornerstone Technologies, Inc...............                   Utah
Atlantic Aerospace Electronics Corporation.........               Delaware
Cayenta Operating Company..........................               Delaware
Cayenta, Inc.......................................               Delaware
DBA Systems, Inc. .................................               Delaware
Delfin Systems.....................................             California
Diversified Control Systems, Inc. .................               Delaware
Eldyne, Inc. ......................................             California
Horizons Technology, Inc. .........................               Delaware
Horizons Services Company, Inc. ...................               Delaware
JB Systems, Inc. (d/b/a Mainsaver Corporation).....               Delaware
Linkabit Wireless, Inc. ...........................               Delaware
Linkabit Wireless Limited..........................         Cayman Islands
MERGECO, Inc. .....................................               Delaware
MicroLithics Corporation ..........................               Colorado
Pulse Sciences, Inc. ..............................             California
Sakon, LLC.........................................               Delaware
SFG Technologies Inc. .............................                 Canada
System Resources Corporation.......................               Delaware
Titan Africa, Inc. ................................               Delaware
Titan Africa, S.A. ................................     Benin, West Africa
Titan Africa-Benin GSM, S.A........................     Benin, West Africa
Titan Food Pasteurization Corp. ...................               Delaware
Titan Medical Sterilization Corp. .................               Delaware
Titan Scan Corp. ..................................               Delaware
Titan Systems Corporation..........................               Delaware
Titan Unidyne Corporation .........................               Delaware
Titan Wireless, Inc. ..............................               Delaware
Titan Sakon, Inc. .................................               Delaware
Tomotherapeutics, Inc..............................               Delaware
Validity Corporation...............................             California
VisiCom Laboratories, Inc. ........................             California
# C_2015320EN.01002501.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 July 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-244/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 320/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

           Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
           18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with this annual report of Espey Mfg. &  Electronics  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, Howard
Pinsley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: September 25, 2006


                                         /s/Howard Pinsley
                                         -----------------------
                                         Howard Pinsley
                                         President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer



37
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-349-000]

Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

July 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 10, 1998, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of August 1, 1998.
    Midwestern states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G issued on April 16, 
1998. Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines, 83 FERC para. 61,029 (1998). Consistent with Order No. 587-
G, Midwestern proposes an effective date of August 1, 1998. Midwestern 
requests a waiver of Section 154.207 to permit an August 1, 1998 
effective date.
    Midwestern states that the revised tariff sheets incorporate by 
reference Version 1.2 of the GISB standards.
    Midwestern states that copies of the filing have been mailed to 
each of the parties that have intervened in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19187 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 11-19.

#### Daniel Crager, Petitioner v. Edison Runyan, et al.

565 U.S. 879, 132 S. Ct. 243,

181 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5455.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2011 Ark. 43, 382 S.W.3d 643.
No. 10-7273.

#### Steven Kent Bloom, Petitioner v. David R. McKune, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1130, 131 S. Ct. 930,

178 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 319.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 220 P.3d 593.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38419-38420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Minor Adjustment of Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Boundary

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of boundary adjustment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Regional 
Director, Region 7, of the Fish and Wildlife Service, has made a minor 
modification to the boundary of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge in 
the State of Alaska. This boundary adjustment was made to incorporate 
within the Refuge a parcel of land, purchased by the United States, 
which is adjacent to the former Refuge boundary. This action added 
71.84 acres to the Refuge.

DATES: Title to the land in question vested in the United States of 
America on December 24, 1996. Notification to Congress of the proposed 
boundary change was provided August 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Division of Realty, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East 
Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6199.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon N. Janis, 907-786-3490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1996, a 1377-acre parcel of land was 
purchased from the Salamatof Native Corporation by the United States, 
for administration by the Fish and Wildlife Service. The majority of 
this parcel lies within the boundaries of the Kenai National Wildlife 
Refuge as established by the Alaska National Interest Lands 
Conservation Act. A portion of the purchased land, 71.84 acres in size, 
falls between the ANILCA boundary and the Kenai River. This portion is 
more particularly described as Lot 7 of Section 31, and Lots 8 and 9 of 
Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 9 West, Seward Meridian, Alaska.

[[Page 38420]]

    Section 103(b) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3103(b)) establishes authority for the Secretary of the 
Interior to make minor boundary adjustments to the Wildlife Refuges 
created by the Act. Under this authority, and following due notice to 
Congress, the Secretary, acting through the Regional Director, Region 
7, of the Fish and Wildlife Service, has used this authority to adjust 
the boundaries of the Kenai Refuge to include the 71.84-acre parcel 
described above. This adjustment modifies the boundary previously 
described in the Federal Register (48 FR 7955, Feb. 24, 1983).
Robyn Thorson,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 98-19005 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 29 

To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 

certain water transfers between any of the States of Texas, Arkansas, 

and Louisiana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain water transfers between any of 

the States of Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Water Supply 

5 Invasive Species Compliance Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 29 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WATER TRANSFERS FROM 

2 THE LACEY ACT AND THE LACEY ACT AMEND3 MENTS OF 1981. 

4 (a) EXEMPTION.—Section 42 of title 18, United 

5 States Code (popularly known as the Lacey Act), and the 

6 Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) 

7 shall not apply with respect to any covered water transfer, 

8 if— 

9 (1)(A) all prohibited species in the water trans10 ferred are located in both of the public water sup11 plies between which the water is transferred; and 

12 (B) the water is transferred directly between 

13 such public water supplies; or 

14 (2) the water is transferred in a closed convey15 ance system directly to treatment facilities where all 

16 prohibited species contained in the water transferred 

17 will be extirpated. 

18 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) COVERED WATER TRANSFER.—The term 

20 ‘‘covered water transfer’’ means a transfer between 

21 public water supplies located on, along, or across the 

22 State boundaries between any of Texas, Arkansas, 

23 and Louisiana, of water containing a prohibited spe24 cies. 

25 (2) PROHIBITED SPECIES.—The term ‘‘prohib26 ited species’’ means any species— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 29 IH

1 (A) the shipment of which is otherwise 

2 prohibited by section 42 of title 18, United 

3 States Code; or 

4 (B) the transfer of which is otherwise pro5 hibited by the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 

6 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.). 

7 (3) PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY.—The term ‘‘public 

8 water supply’’ means any body of water, including 

9 any river, lake, or stream, the water of which is 

10 available or made available to the public. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS