alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2
  
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Robert
Mathews, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking
Systems, Inc.
   Date:
      November 14, 2008
              /s/ Robert
      MathewsRobert
      MathewsChief
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3906-3907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Open Meeting For Representatives of Health Professional 
Organizations

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public 
meeting with representatives of health professional organizations. The 
meeting will be chaired by Sharon Smith Holston, Deputy Commissioner 
for External Affairs. The agenda will include presentations and 
discussions on the topics of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, and the 
role of FDA in the regulation of products used in complementary and 
alternative medicine. There will also be a brief update on tobacco.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, February 9, 1998, from 1:30 
p.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bethesda Hyatt, One Metro 
Center, Bethesda, MD.


[[Page 3907]]


REGISTRATION: There is no registration fee, however, space is limited. 
Persons will be registered in the order in which calls are received. 
Please call Betty B. Palsgrove at 301-827-6618 to register. 
Registrations also may be transmitted by fax to 1-800-344-3332 or 301-
443-2446. Please include the name and title of the person attending and 
the name of the organization.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter H. Rheinstein, M.D., J.D., 
Office of Health Affairs (HFY-40), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-6630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide an opportunity for 
representatives of health professional organizations and other 
interested persons to be briefed by senior FDA staff. It will also 
provide an opportunity for informal discussion on these topics of 
particular interest to health professional organizations.
    This public meeting is free of charge; however, space is limited. 
Registration for the meeting will be accepted in the order received and 
should be sent to the contact person. Registration should include the 
name and title of the person attending and the name of the organization 
being represented, if any.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-1850 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
February 9, 2012Mr. Andrew SteckelU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105

Dear Mr. Steckel:

The Air Resources Board is providing information your staff requested from the

Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) regarding alternatives analysis for fumigant

volatile organic compound regulations. This package consists of the following

documents:

I) June 1, 2011 letter from Mr. Randy Segawa, DPR Environmental Program

Manager, to Mr. Andrew Steckel, U.S. EPA, transmitting DPR’s evaluation

of fumigation methods and information on other potential pesticide Volatile

Organic Carbon reduction measures. This package includes the following

documents:

A) Reducing Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Pesticides:

Analysis of Alternatives for Filed Fumigation Methods;

B) September 29, 2007 Memorandum to Mr. John Sanders with the

following four appendices:

1) Registrant Proposed Field Adjustment Factors for Methyl

Bromide and Chloropicrin (Appendix 1);

2) Review of Registrant Proposed Field Adjustment Factors

(Appendix 2);

3) September 24, 2007 Memorandum to Mr. Randy Segawa

(Appendix 3); and

4) Studies Excluded from the Department of Pesticide

Regulation’s Evaluation of Fumigant Volatile Organic

Compound Emissions (Appendix 4);

C) December 2, 1999 Memorandum to Mr. Randy Segawa;

D) January 29, 2010 Memorandum to Mr. Randy Segawa;E) January 23, 2009 Memorandum to Mr. Randy Segawa; andF) January 11, 2011 Memorandum to Mr. John Leahy.

The energy challenge facing California is real. Eveiy Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption.

For a list ofsimple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: htt://www.arb.ca.ciov

California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled Paper
information on DPR

s evaluation of fumigation methods and other potential

pesticide Volatile Organic Carbon reduction measures. This packageincludes the following:

A) Updated version of Reducing Volatile Organic Compound Emissions

from Pesticides: Analysis of Alternatives for Fumigant Methods

document;

B) Same document with track changes; and

C) Documents regarding the Matter of the Responsible Farmers

Coalition’s Request for Approval of Reduced Volatile OrganicCompound Emissions Field Fumigation Methods.

If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 322-5350 or contact

Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch at (916) 322-7137.

Sincerely,

Linda C. Murchison, Chief

Planning and Technical Support Division

Enclosures

cc: (w/o enclosures)

Mr. Chris Reardon

Chief Deputy DirectorCalifornia Department of Pesticide

Regulation

1001 I Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief

Air Quality Data BranchAir Resources Board
S91A1670.

#### BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FULTON COUNTY v. 1991 TAX DIGEST FOR FULTON COUNTY.

(410 SE2d 721)

Weltner, Justice.

Pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-310, the trial court was authorized to enter an order for the immediate and temporary collection of real property taxes for tax year 1991 on the basis of the 1990 tax digest. The constitutional challenge to the statute is without merit.

However, it was beyond the province of the trial court to require *703the county authorities to justify the wisdom (as opposed to the legality) of proposed county expenditures.1 That portion of the trial court’s order is vacated.2

Decided November 25, 1991.

*Webb & Daniel, Harold T. Daniel, Jr., Gary R. McCain,*for appellant.

*Fortson & White, Warren C. Fortson, W. Roy Mays III, R. Michael Robinson, Joe M. Harris, Jr., Robert J. Proctor,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 See, e.g., *Whatley v. Taylor County,*224 Ga. 669, 670 (164 SE2d 121) (1968):

> [A] large discretion is vested in the county commissioners in the expenditure of public money within the specified purposes enumerated in the Constitution. . . . This court will not interfere with the discretionary action of the county commissioners within the sphere of their legally delegated powers, unless such action amounts to an abuse of discretion.

2

 Pursuant to the power given to this Court by OCGA § 48-5-310, and more particularly sub paragraph (f) (3) thereof; but, not being limited thereto, this Court shall retain jurisdiction and shall conduct a hearing ... so the County may demonstrate and explain its budgeting and spending procedure for “Arts and Human Services,” in the light of present admitted financial difficulties. [Trial court’s order.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        112,258
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               4,780,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (219,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 5,972,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,316,370
<PP&E>                                      3,568,095
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,354,124)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,040,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       8,841,886
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      201,970
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,185,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,040,589
<SALES>                                    27,987,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           27,987,969
<CGS>                                      23,838,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              23,838,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            4,860,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            680,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,391,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,391,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,391,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.98)
        

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 96-60449

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

BERTHA HAIK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE KROGER COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(5:95-CV-31-BRN)

______________________________________________________

April 2, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant, Bertha Haik, challenges the district court's

denial of her post-judgment motion for judgment as a matter of law

and for new trial. Our review of the record reveals that the

evidence is sufficient to support the jury's verdict in favor of

the defendant, the Kroger Company, in this slip and fall case.

Contested jury issues were presented as to whether the cause of Ms.

Haik's fall was moisture left on the floor by employees of Kroger

and if so, whether the store had posted a hazard sign before her

fall. Ms. Haik also did not move for motion for judgment as a
2

matter of law before the case was submitted to the jury. Under

these circumstances, to prevail on a post-judgment motion for

judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, the moving party

must demonstrate that the non-movant presented no evidence in

support of its claim. See Bunch v. Walter, 673 F.2d 127, 130 (5th

Cir. 1982). Because Kroger did present some evidence to support

the jury verdict, the district court correctly denied Ms. Haik's

post-judgment motions.

AFFIRMED.
No. 10-10916.

#### Jobita Willetta Avery, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 857, 132 S. Ct. 190,

181 L. Ed. 2d 97,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5935.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*98Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 937.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Praxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ending November 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Stadnyk, President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive and
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ DAVID STADNYK
------------------------------------------
David Stadnyk
President, and Treasurer























                                       16
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan IIIThomas L. Monahan IIIChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2007/s/ Timothy R. YostTimothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2007
# C_2015302EN.01000502.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-88/14) (1)

1

((Actions for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 - Article 1(1) and (4) - Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 - Article 1(4)(f) - Article 290 TFEU - Suspension of exemption from the visa requirement - Insertion of a footnote - Amendment of the legislative act))

(2015/C 302/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, B. Martenczuk and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, A. Troupiotis and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Council of the European Union (represented by K. Pleśniak and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: Czech Republic (represented by M. Smolek, D. Hadroušek and J. Škeřík, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
# Correlation of MILSTRAP Document Identifier (DI) Code Functionality to DLMS Supplements (DS)

# Correlation of MILSTRAP Legacy Document Identifier (DI) Code Functionality to DLMS Implementation Convention (IC)

# Correlation of DLMS Transaction to MILSTRAP Legacy Document Identifier Code (DIC) Functionality (DLMS Sequence)

� No MILSTRAP equivalent transaction exists for DS 650A or DS 650C; but non-DLSS DICs are shown.  

� DLMS enhancement.  No DLSS MILSTRAP legacy DIC exists for DS 830D.

� DLMS enhancement.  No MILSTRAP legacy DIC equivalent exists for DLMS 846A. 

6/15/2012

6/15/2012
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,691]


Amity Dyeing & Finishing, Augusta, Georgia; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on June 22, 1998, in response to a petition filed on 
behalf of workers at Amity Dyeing & Finishing, Augusta, Georgia.
    The subject plant closed in August of 1997 and has not reopened 
since that time. Workers at the plant were denied eligibility to apply 
for Trade Adjustment Assistance in a determination issued on November 
24, 1997 (TA-W-33,815). No new evidence has been brought forward to 
indicate that conditions have changed. Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of June, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-18579 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
----

----

| 1. | the      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc., for the      period ended June 30, 2008  (the “Report”) fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon      Ridge Development Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |
|   |   |

|                                   |                         |                         |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                   |                         |
|                                   |                         |                         |
| Dated:  August      13, 2008 |                         | /s/ Karen      Y. Duran |
|                                   | Karen      Y. Duran,         |
|                                   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
AVKARE, INC
., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2016

- 1630

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15

- cv

- 01015

- EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES S. P HILLIPS , Argus Legal, PLLC, McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by J AMES S. D EL S ORDO , Manassas, VA.

J AMES W ILLIAM P OIRIER , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defen dant -appellee. Also represented by M ARTIN F. H OCKEY , J R ., R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R ., B ENJAMIN C. M IZER ; M AURA C ATHERINE B ROWN , E LYSE M. G RIFFITHS , Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, IL.______________________

T H IS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , M OORE , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03513

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Exhibit 23.2

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-26659 and 33-60696) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated 1997
Stock Option Plan and the Reliability Incorporated Employee Stock Savings Plan and Trust, respectively, of our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Reliability Incorporated included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Ramirez International            
|Financial & Accounting Services, Inc.
|                                     
|Irvine, California                   
|March 27, 2009