alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 306 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 306

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a reconnaissance 
 survey of the site of the Kettle Creek Battlefield in Wilkes County, 
        Georgia, and adjacent property, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KETTLE CREEK BATTLEFIELD SURVEY.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Kettle Creek 
Battlefield Survey Act''.
    (b) Reconnaissance Survey.--
            (1) Survey.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in 
        this section as the ``Secretary'') shall conduct a 
        reconnaissance survey of the site of the Kettle Creek 
        Battlefield in Wilkes County, Georgia, and adjacent property 
        (referred to in this section as the ``site'').
            (2) Requirements for survey.--In conducting the survey 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall evaluate the 
        likelihood that resources within the site boundary would meet 
        the four criteria for new parklands--
                    (A) national significance;
                    (B) suitability;
                    (C) feasibility; and
                    (D) need for National Park Service management.
            (3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date on which 
        funds are made available to carry out the survey under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a 
        report that describes--
                    (A) the results of the survey; and
                    (B) any conclusions and recommendations of the 
                Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 306

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a reconnaissance 
 survey of the site of the Kettle Creek Battlefield in Wilkes County, 
        Georgia, and adjacent property, and for other purposes.
```
No. 11-5189.

#### Tracy Hertel, Petitioner v. Mark Sevier, Superintendent, Miami Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 280,

181 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5728.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending November 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Miller,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.

By: /s/ David A. Miller
    -------------------

David A. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2005
July 27, 2015

Mr. Daniel Bess

4116 Potts Creek Road

Covington, VA 24426

Dear Mr. Bess:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your July 2, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2691), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Page 5(a)
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Of The Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section
906 Of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ludlum
Construction Co., Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q-SB of the Company for
the period ended March 31, 2003, as amended, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.


Dated: December 20, 2004         By: /s/ FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                 Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                                 Appointed by Board of Directors
                                 on March 19, 2004


Certification Of The Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Ludlum
Construction Co., Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q-SB of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31,  2003, as amended, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report.

Dated: December 20, 2004         By: /s/ FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                 Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                                 Appointed by Board of Directors
                                 on March 19, 2004
No. 11-5497.

#### Joseph Swafford, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 911, 132 S. Ct. 320,

181 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6142.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 265.
The DLA Disposition Services sales office manages the sale of 

surplus DoD property deemed appropriate and safe for the 

general public.

Overview of E-Sales

E-Sales is the electronic system which offers the general public the 

opportunity to bid electronically on a wide array of federal assets, 

including Surplus, Personal Property, Hazardous Material (HM), 

DEMIL As Condition of Sale (DOCS). Using our electronic system to 

purchase items that are for auction, bidders, both nationally and 

internationally. Bidders may actively participate in multiple auctions 

held throughout the world on a daily basis. 

The DLA Disposition Services ESales site is accessible via:

www.sales.dla.mil

http://www.dla.mil/dispositionservices.aspx
Step 1: Go to www.dla.mil/dispositionservices

Step 2: Click “What Disposition Services Offers"

Step 3: Click “Public Sales" Offerings 

Step 4: Click “Bidding"

Step 5: Click the link to our www.sales.dla.mil
Step 1—Select a region 

from the drop down menu
Step 2 – Choose a Sales Category by clicking the Plus Box (expanding the section 

choices list).

Step 3 – Choose the folder for the type of 

sale you want to view.

Note – If there are no 

active auctions you will 

receive this message
Step 5 – Choose the 

auction you wish to view 

by clicking the Blue Title

Step 4 – Choose the 

type of auction you 

wish to view by clicking.
Step 6 – You can view the Auction details 

two ways:

A)View the information within the text boxes

B)Click the “print auction summary” which 

launches a printable .pdf file
Step 1 – Choose 

CREATE NEW ACCOUNT

Step 2 – Fill in all required information

Step 3 – Fill in Login Data. Note the 

password requirements are specific

Step 4 – Click the “I’m not a robot” 

box and follow the instructions

Step 5— Click Save
Step 6 – Choose HOME
HOW TO BID ON AUCTIONS

Step 1 – Login to the system 

using Email and Password

Step 2 – Click the “I’m not a 

robot” box and follow instructions

Step 3 – Click the “log on”
HOW TO BID ON AUCTIONS

Step 4—Select a region from 

the drop down menu

Step 5 ‐ Select a type of sale
HOW TO BID ON AUCTIONS

Step 6 ‐ Select the Auction 

you wish to bid on

Step 7 – You can view the Auction details 

two ways:

A) View the information within the text box

B) Click the “print auction summary” which 

launches a printable .pdf file
HOW TO BID ON AUCTIONS

Step 8 – Enter the bid amount

Step 9 – Click “calculate”

Step 10 – Enter number of days agreed to pay for and remove property. 

*note timing may affect market pricing

Step 11 – Click “bid”

Step 12 – Click “OK”
HOW TO BID ON AUCTIONS

Step 13 – Click “OK”

To Log Out, close your browser

window
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.22. APPENDIX 8.22**

**DOCUMENT MODIFIER(INVENTORY CONTROL POINT TO PROCUREMENT)**

AP3.22-2

2

APPENDIX 3.22

AP8.22-1

APPENDIX 8.22
No. 10-10682.

#### Edward Roy Newsome, aka Edward R. Newsome, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 158,

181 L. Ed. 2d 73,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6278.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 18 August 2006 

CASE NUMBER: P06-0702

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL: 2-3 3 

KEYWORDS: AQUATOX-A,C, ACUTE, CORROS-S,E,L,GI, LIVER 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT: 

FATE: MW285 

liquid with mp < 20 C (P) 

log Kow of the = 4.7 (ClogP), 5.8 (EPI) 

log Kow of the soluble salt, at pH 7 would be lower (P) 

S = 3.2 to 93 mg/L at 20 C (P), 1.6 mg/L at 25 C, pH ? (PMN) 

S of the soluble salt, at pH 7 would be higher (P) 

vp = 8.9E-4 mm Hg or torr at 25 EC (P) 

bp = 320 EC (P) 

H = 2.6E-7 (P) 

log Koc = 4.9 (P) 

log fish BCF = 3.8 (P) 

sorption to sludge = strong 

POTW removal = 90% via sorption and biodegradation 

time for complete ultimate aerobic biodegradation = weeks to 

months 

sorption to soils and sediments = very strong 

PBT Potential: P1B3T2 

*CEB FATE: migration to ground water = negligible 

HEALTH: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties; 

test data for analogs: 

corrosive to eyes ( ); 

rat 4-h acute inhalation LC50 = 0.22 mg/L ( ); 

rat acute oral LD50 = 380 mg/kg ( ); 

corrosive to skin ( ); 

rat 90-d oral toxicity test with doses = 20, 5, and 2 mg/kg/d 

with NOEL = 2 mg/kg/d and LOEL = 5 mg/kg/d based on liver 

toxicity ( ); 

concern for chronic liver toxicity, acute toxicity, and corrosion 

to membranes based on test data for analogs; 

moderate to high concern for toxicity 

*CEB HEALTH: Exposures to humans: inhalation, dermal, 

ingestion, and drinking water; XB: Testing desired. 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L 

(ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 1.4 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 0.150 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = 0.720 P 

fish chronic value = 0.100 P 

daphnid ChV = 0.020 P 

algal ChV = 0.300 P 

Predictions are based on SARs for based on predicted log Kow 

of the but predicted ECs based on soluble salt at pH 7; SAR 

chemical class = ; MW285; liquid with mp < 20 C (P); log 

Kow of the = 4.7 (ClogP), 5.8 (EPI); log Kow of the soluble 

salt, at pH 7 would be lower (P); S = 3.2 to 93 mg/L at 

20 C (P), 1.6 mg/L at 25 C, pH ? (PMN); S of the soluble salt, 

 at pH 7 would be higher (P); pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 

mg/L; 

high concern for toxicity 

mitigation of toxicity expected in the presence of 10 mg TOC/L, 

but not measured for this subclass of ; 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.002 mg/L (ppm) assuming no 

mitigation due to TOC in dilution water 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to surface waters with CC = 2 ppb; 

XB: Testing desired. 

SAT Co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

s0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147180

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHI GAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147180

COA: 300875

Macomb CC: 2009

- 001114

- FC

KENNETH RAY WITHERSPOON, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3204 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself and Mrs. KIRKPATRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall 

Interceptor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nogales Wastewater 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, 

7 OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section: 

9 (1) AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘Agreement’’ 

10 means the memorandum of agreement between the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3204 IH

1 United States Section of the International Boundary 

2 and Water Commission and the City of Nogales, Ar3 izona, dated January 20, 2006. 

4 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 

5 Nogales, Arizona. 

6 (3) NOGALES SANITATION PROJECT.—The term 

7 ‘‘Nogales sanitation project’’ means the project 

8 owned by the City and the United States Section of 

9 the International Boundary and Water Commission 

10 and includes— 

11 (A) the International Outfall Interceptor 

12 (IOI) and the trunkline; and 

13 (B) the Nogales International Wastewater 

14 Treatment Plant (NIWTP). 

15 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con16 gress that, pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 

17 U.S.C. 277d–10 et seq.), and notwithstanding the Agree18 ment, an equitable proportion of the costs of operation and 

19 maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be con20 tributed by the City should be based on the average daily 

21 volume of wastewater originating from the City. 

22 (c) CAPITAL COSTS EXCLUDED.—Pursuant to the 

23 Agreement and the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 

24 277d–10 et seq.), the City shall have no obligation to conVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:26 Jun 14, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3204.IH H3204

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3204 IH

1 tribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading the 

2 Nogales sanitation project. 

3 (d) OVERCHARGES.—Notwithstanding the Agree4 ment, the United States Section of the International 

5 Boundary and Water Commission shall not charge the 

6 City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 

7 and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion 

8 of the costs, as described in subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
The public benefit is served by the additional level of safety provided by employing an actual airplane to 

conduct the required training and check rides versus the use of a simulator. The currently available 

approved flight simulators do not match the level of avionics systems in the actual aircraft, thus the 

actual aircraft provides an effective, “more real world” training platform. A more effectively trained pilot 

is a safer pilot once qualified and in the cockpit.

The public safety will not be compromised by the issuance of this exemption. The aircraft in question are 

dual certificated, both in the standard and restricted categories. The aircraft are maintained in 

accordance with the aircraft manufacturers recommendations and are operated in accordance with FAA 

issued operating limitations as part of the restricted category certificate.

The following aircraft would be used for the training and check rides:

Aircraft Make Aircraft Model Registration Number Serial Number

Beechcraft B200C N4456A BL-143

Beechcraft B200C N5139A BL-144

Beechcraft B200C N4489A BL-145

Beechcraft B200C N5155A BL-146

Beechcraft B200C N299AL BB-1823
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chiefexecutive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida

Mr. John E. Simpson

Deputy Director

Retired Marine Corps Lt. Col. John E. Simpson became the deputy director of 

DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida, in Sept. 2021. Simpson retired from 

the Marine Corps after serving nearly 31 years.

Simpson enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1988 and atended boot camp after 

graduating high school. Following boot camp, Marine Combat Training and 

the Enlisted Supply Basic Course, he was assigned to various commands at 

Quantico, Virginia, Marine Corps Air Station Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii and 

NSA Millington, Tenessee, as a supply clerk and warehouse chief; where he 

participated in several exercises and deployments.

In June 1997, Simpson was transferred to Inspector-Instructor Staff, Marietta, 

Georgia, where he served as the logistics and training chief for MWSS-472. Simpson reported to 2d Marine 

Division in Jan. 2009, where he served as a supply analyst andwas responsible for helping to implement ATLASS 

II+ supply and maintanence tracking system for the Marine Corps throughout the Marine Expeditionary Force. 

Simpson was promoted to staff sergeant in 2002 and ordered to serve as a formal school instructor at the Marine 

Corps Combat Service Support School at Camp Johnson, North Carolina.

While assigned to MCCSS, Simpson was selected as ground supply operations warrant officer and ordered to 

serve with 2nd Supply Batallion at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. During this tour, Simpson was responsible for 

reverting Operation Iraqi Freedom as the detachment operations and distribution officer. He also participated in 

numerous pilot programs with OSD and DLA. In 2008, Simpson was selected to serve as a distribution officer and 

subsequently promoted to Captain in 2009.

In Aug. 2009, Simpson reported to Combat Logistics Regiment-35 and was assigned as the operations officer. 

During this tour, Simpson was responsible for the logistics planning of several exercises and operations. He also 

served as the operations officer for the Joint Logistics Task Force assigned to Sendai, Japan. Simpson reported 

to Marine Forces, Central Command in Aug. 2012 and served as the force sustainment and distribution officer. 

During this tour, he served a combat tour with Operation Enduring Freedom and was responsible for supervising 

deployment/redeployment and retrograde operations throughout U.S. Central Command.

Simpson received orders to serve in a joint capacity with the Defense Logistics Agency, Distribution Headquarters 

as a joint distribution planner in J5. During this tour, he participated in Operation United Assistance and led the 

efforts to establish distribution networks and provide materials needed to establish health clinics in the remote 

jungle of western Africa. He also supported humanitarian efforts in Northern Iraq and Syria, providing badlyneeded cold weather clothing and shelter to 2.5 million internally displaced people.

Simpson’s decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (2), Meritorious Service Medal, Navy, 

Marine Corps Commendation Medal (5) and the Navy Achievement Medal (4).