alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18541]



[[Page 37546]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: NROTC Applicant 
Questionnaire; NAVCRUIT Form 1131/6; OMB Number 0703-0028.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 40,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 40,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 10,000.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection is used by the Navy 
Recruiting Command to determine basic eligibility for the Four-Year 
NROTC Scholarship Program, and is necessary for the initial screening 
of prospective applicants. Use of this questionnaire is the only 
accurate and specific method to determine scholarship awards. Each 
individual who wishes to apply for the scholarship program completes 
and returns the questionnaire.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-18541 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6566

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILIP MANGLITZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting

by designation. (CR-95-314-S, CA-99-2997-HNM)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 30, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Manglitz, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Philip Manglitz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Manglitz,

Nos. CR-95-314-S; CA-99-2997-HNM (D. Md. Mar. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### *State, Respondent, v. Reid, Petitioner,*

No. 92111-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46137-4-II, July 21, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1063. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
No. 11-5009.

#### Ben Latham, Petitioner v. Sarah Palin, former Governor of Alaska, et al.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 257,

181 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5430.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska denied.

Same case below, 251 P.3d 341.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3885-3886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ES97-7-001]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Amendment of Application

January 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 15, 1998, Consumers Energy Company 
filed an amendment to its original application in this proceeding. The 
amendment seeks authorization to issue up to $475 million of first 
mortgage bonds for the sole purpose of serving as security for long-
term refunding notes authorized in this docket. The first mortgage 
bonds would not themselves be a source of funds for Consumers, nor 
would they increase Consumers' total indebtedness. Consumers also 
requested waivers of the Commission's competitive bid and negotiated 
placement requirements for certain securities to be issued pursuant to 
authorization granted in this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211

[[Page 3886]]

and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before January 29, 1998. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make the Protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1868 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Viking  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
B.  Marsh,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2004



/s/ Thomas B. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer, President
No. 10-10787.

#### Jose Garcia Orellana, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 172,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6433.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 209.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

  80
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3
                           ETHYL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF PRO-FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          for the year ended December 31, 1994
                         (In thousands except per share amounts)



At the close of business on February 28, 1994, Ethyl completed the spin-off of its wholly
owned subsidiary, Albemarle, in the form of a tax-free stock dividend.  Following the
spin-off, Albemarle owns directly or indirectly, the olefins and derivatives, bromine
chemicals and specialty chemical businesses formerly owned directly or indirectly by the
Company.  As a result of the aforementioned distribution, the Company believes that the
following PRO FORMA financial information is important to enable the reader to obtain a
meaningful understanding of the Company's results of operations.  The PRO FORMA
information is presented to illustrate the estimated effects of the distribution of
Albemarle on Ethyl on a stand-alone basis and may not necessarily reflect the future
results of operations of Ethyl or what the earnings or results of operations of Ethyl
would have been had Albemarle operated as a separate, independent company.



                                                           1994
                                                          -------
<S>                                                       <C>
Pro-forma net income                                      $91,479


Average number of shares of common stock outstanding      118,427

Shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of
   outstanding stock options (1)                               24
                                                          -------
Shares of common stock and common stock
   equivalents (1) (2)                                    118,451
                                                          =======

Pro-forma earnings per share (3)                            $0.78
                                                          =======

<FN>
Notes:

(1)   For fully-diluted earnings per share, the shares issuable upon the assumed exercise
      of outstanding stock options would be 26 and the shares of common stock equivalents
      would have been 118,453.

(2)   To determine the average number of shares of common stock and common stock
      equivalents, the average number of common shares and common stock equivalents
      outstanding (actual or assumed for equivalents) during each month were added
      together and the sum was then divided by 12.

(3)   Primary earnings per share and fully-diluted earnings per share are the same
      amounts.

</TABLE>
No. 10-6985.

#### Keith E. Frazier, Petitioner v. Hearing Officer Jackson, et al.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 912,

178 L. Ed. 2d 762,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 272.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 808.
No. 10-10863.

#### Leviticus Burns, Petitioner v. Dennis Brown, Warden.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 182,

181 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5957.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
July 3, 1998

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: OST-98-4015
Date Filed: July 1, 1998
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    PTC12 Telex Mail Vote 946-r1-4
    USA-Austria/Belgium/Germany/Neth/Scand/Switz fares
    r1-002m, r2-054vv, r3-044v, r4-064vv
    Intended effective date: August 1, 1998

Docket Number: OST-98-4016
Date Filed: July 2, 1998
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    PTC2 ME 0045 dated June 26, 1998
    Within Middle East Expedited Resos
    r-1-002j, r-2-070ba, r-3-071ea, r-4-072c, r-5-079b, r-6-085dd, r-7-
002o
    Intended effective date: August 1/October 1, 1998

Docket Number: OST-98-4017
Date Filed: July 2, 1998
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    COMP Telex Mail Vote 948
    Standard Condition Resolution for Special Fares
    Intended effective date: August 1, 1998

Docket Number: OST-98-4020
Date Filed: July 2, 1998
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    PTC2 EUR-ME 0056 dated June 30, 1998
    Europe-Middle East Expedited Resos 002a
    Intended Effective Date: August 1, 1998.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-18952 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### *State, Respondent, v. Peppin, Petitioner,*

No. 91952-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32058-8-III, April 9, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 901. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7463

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RUSSELL SHIFLETT, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(1:06-cr-00252-JFM-1; 1:08-cv-00499-JFM) 

Submitted: January 29, 2009 Decided: February 19, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Russell Shiflett, Appellant Pro Se. Kwame Jangha Manley, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Russell Shiflett seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Shiflett has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

 

(Continued) 

*

 The district court rejected Shiflett’s ineffective 

assistance of counsel claims upon the reasoning that they could 

not be litigated in a § 2255 proceeding because they had been 

raised on direct appeal and denied. While it is correct that 

Shiflett raised these claims on direct appeal, we explicitly 

declined to consider them, noting that ineffective assistance of 

counsel claims should ordinarily be pursued in post-conviction 

proceedings. Nevertheless, we find it unnecessary to remand 

2 
3 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

 

these claims to the district court for plenary consideration as 

our review of the record leaves us with no doubt that Shiflett’s 

contentions that his trial attorney was ineffective are 

insubstantial.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3053

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to reauthorize the Personal 
                   Responsibility Education Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2019

 Ms. Blunt Rochester introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title V of the Social Security Act to reauthorize the Personal 
                   Responsibility Education Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``PREP Reauthorization Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY EDUCATION PROGRAM (PREP).

    Section 513 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 713) is amended--
            (1) in paragraphs (1)(A) and (4)(A) of subsection (a), by 
        striking ``2019'' and inserting ``2024'' each place it appears;
            (2) in subsection (a)(4)(B)(i), by striking ``2019'' and 
        inserting ``2024''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``2019'' and inserting 
        ``2024''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-1385.

#### Martin Grosz and Lilian Grosz, Petitioners v. The Museum of Modern Art.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 102,

181 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6693.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 575.
No. 11-205.

#### Ronald Louis Bradshaw, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 255,

181 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5808.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 618.
Commodity 2006 Pounds 

Applied

2007 Pounds 

Applied

2008 Pounds 

Applied

N-GRNHS GRWN PLANTS IN CONTAINERS 1.1 1.2 0.4

N-GRNHS GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 0.1 0.2 0.1

N-OUTDR CONTAINER/FLD GRWN PLANTS 0.3 0.2 0.3

N-OUTDR GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 0.2

Grand Total 1.5 1.8 0.8

Date Prepared: 07/20/10

Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm

Empty cells indicate no available usage.

Ancymidol(099050) Cal. DPR Usage Data 

Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the 

following table outlining the pounds of Ancymidol used in California over the three most recent years available (2006 

- 2008).
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00121-CR

GEORGE VILLARREAL CRUZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-CRF-0526-S1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2013
# Table 4_1
#### *In re Dependency of O.R.L.,*

No. 91634-9.

Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32320-0-III, March 24, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 682. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C-3743]


Tenet Healthcare Corp.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order, among other things, requires Tenet 
Healthcare Corporation (``Tenet''), a California acute care hospital 
chain, to divest OrNda's French Hospital Medical Center and related 
assets and facilities by August 1, 1997. The consent order also 
requires Tenet to maintain the marketability and viability of French 
Hospital, pending the divestiture of French, and to notify the 
Commission before combining its acute care hospitals in San Luis Obispo 
County with any other acute care hospital in the area and before 
acquiring any Monarch stock.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 20, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 600 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Leibenluft, FTC/S-3115, 
Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-3688.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, February 5, 1997, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 62 FR 5418, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, 
for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were 
given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to divest, as set forth in the proposed consent 
agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1800 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
No. 10-10342.

#### Vrain Scott, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 834, 132 S. Ct. 136,

181 L. Ed. 2d 56,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5317.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 341.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA**  **WESTERN DISTRICT**
IN RE: PETITION OF G REGORY A. BELUSCHAK AND AT LEAST FIVE (5) ELECTORS OF THE FIRS T WA RD OF THE CITY OF CLAIRTON TO APPOINT GREGORY A. BELUSCHAK , A REGISTERED ELECTOR I N AND RESIDENT OF THE FIRS T WA RD OF THE CITY OF CLAIRTON , TO FILL THE CURRENT VACANCY ON C LAIRTON CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FIRST WARD OF THE CITY OF CLAIRTON, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PE NNSYLVANIA
RE: PETITION OF RICH ARD L. LATTANZI, RAYMOND A. KURTA AND FIVE (5) ELECTORS OF THE FIRST WA RD OF THE CITY OF CLAIRTON TO APPOINT RAYMOND A. ( "TONY") KURTA TO FILL THE VACANCY ON CLAIRTON CITY COUNCI L DUE TO THE PASSING OF COUNCILMA N JOHN A. LATTA N ZI ON OCTOBER 24, 20 16
APPEAL OF: GREGORY A . BELUSCHAK : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 4 WA P 2017
A ppeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of All egheny County entered January 17 , 2017 at No. GD

- 16

- 023932.

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M** 

AND NOW , this 20 th day of March , 2017, this matter is hereby transferred to the Commonwealth Court.