alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
   
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Griessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:
 
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 By: /s/ Stephen GriesselStephen GriesselChief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6803

ALPHONSO MARTIN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RALPH S. BEARDSLEY, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-2342-6-22AK) Submitted: February 10, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonso Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge on Appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to introduce evidence and failing to advise Appellant of his rightto appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court as to those claims. See Martin v. Beardsley , No. CA-96-2342-6-22AK (D.S.C. May 20, 1997). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district courtorder based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation denying his claims that: (1) counsel was ineffective for failing to suppress his statement to the police; (2) the prosecutor withheld evidence from the grand jury; and (3) the district court submitted an improper jury instruction on self defense.The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review3 of the above claims by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,551<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (338)
<INVENTORY>                                     54,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                       (74,311)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,881
<SALES>                                         12,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,709
<CGS>                                            7,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                       398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<FN>
<F1>Balance includes $2,229 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: July 8, 2011   /s/ Richard A. Pomije Richard A. Pomije CEO            Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: July 8, 2011   /s/ Paul R. Gramstad Paul R. Gramstad CFO
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37107-37108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-74-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheet to become effective June 29, 1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Third Revised Sheet No. 724

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheet is being filed 
to reflect the removal of a non-conforming Service Agreement which 
terminated by its own terms on April 30, 1998.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations.

[[Page 37108]]

All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18181 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: June 22, 1998, 63 
FR 33924.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: June 24, 1998, 10:00 
a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Numbers and Companies have 
been added on the Agenda scheduled for the June 24, 1998 meeting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Item No.                      Docket No. and company        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAE-19                           EC96-19-007 and ER96-1663-008, Pacific 
                                  Gas and Electric Company, Southern    
                                  California Edison Company and San     
                                  Diego Gas & Electric Company.         
                                 ER98-441-000 and 001, Southern         
                                  California Edison Company.            
                                 ER98-495-000 and 001, Pacific Gas and  
                                  Electric Company.                     
                                 ER98-496-000 and 001, San Diego Gas &  
                                  Electric Company.                     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17324 Filed 6-25-98; 11:39 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-1280

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM064AD

ATR42-92-0024, R02 --- 4/17/14

ATR72-92-1032, R02 --- 4/17/14

ATR42-92-0024, R01 --- 1/16/14

ATR72-92-1032, R01 --- 1/16/14

ATR42-92-0024 --- 6/6/13

ATR72-92-1032 --- 6/6/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

AY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
No. 10-7948.

#### Robert Allen Stanford, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1028,

178 L. Ed. 2d 850,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 632.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 73.
# Offeror A

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
#### *Porter, Respondent, v. Boisso, Petitioner,*

No. 91959-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 31805-2-III and 31809-5-III, June 16, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 286. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

** **

                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,the undersigned officer of CoBiz Financial Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 13,  2009 |   | /s/  Steven Bangert                   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   | Steven  Bangert                       |
|   |                 |   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
FINAL - September 19, 2023 

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP) 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

September 22, 2023 

AGENDA ITEM 

10:00 Welcome and introductions 

10:30 Introduction 

10:40 RSVpreF Vaccine Safety Surveillance in Pregnancy from The 

Vaccine Safety Datalink 

Maternal RSV vaccine safety monitoring in the VAERS and Vsafe 

11:10 Economic analysis of RSVpreF maternal vaccination 

11:30 Economics of Preventing RSV Disease among US Infants by 

Maternal Vaccination Prior to Birth 

12:00 

EtR Framework Updates: Pfizer Maternal RSVpreF Vaccine 

12:30 Updated clinical considerations for use of both nirsevimab 

and Pfizer RSVpreF vaccine 

12:40 Implementation considerations for maternal RSV vaccine 

2:05 Vaccines for Children Resolution 

2:20 Break

2:30 Public comment 

2:50 Break

2:55 Recommendation and VFC votes 

3:20 Adult and Pediatric Immunization Schedule Addendum 

PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s) 

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair) 

Dr. Melinda Wharton (ACIP Executive 

Secretary, CDC) 

Dr. Sarah Long (ACIP, WG Chair) 

Dr. Malini DeSilva (HealthPartners Institute) 

Dr. Pedro Moro (CDC/NCEZID) 

Dr. David Hutton (University of Michigan) 

Dr. Ismael Ortega-Sanchez (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Katherine Fleming-Dutra (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Jefferson Jones (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Georgina Peacock (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Jeanne Santoli (CDC/NCIRD) 

Dr. Sarah Schillie (CDC/NCIRD) 

4:00 Adjourn 

Acronyms

CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019 

EtR Evidence to Recommendations Framework 

FDA Food and Drug Administration 

GRADE Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation 

HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration 

IHS Indian Health Service 

NCHHSTP National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/DDID] 

NCIRD National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases [of CDC/DDID] 

NCEZID National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/DDID] 

NIAID National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 

OIDP Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy 

RSV Respiratory Syncytial Virus 

SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 

VAERS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System 

WG Work Group 

WHO World Health Organization 

VaST COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Work Group 

VE Vaccine Effectiveness
AMENDMENT NO. 1,dated as of January 25, 2008 (the “Amendment”), to EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and SUCCESSOR COMPANIES AND JOHN D. REIERSEN, dated as of September 13, 2006 (the “Agreement”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (the “Company”) and John D. Reiersen (the “Employee”) have entered into the Agreement which sets forth the terms and conditions upon which the Employee is employed by the Company and upon which the Company compensates the Employee.





WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary:





1.  The Employee’s employment may be terminated by the Company at any time with or without cause upon written notice by the Company to the Employee to such effect.  In the event of termination by the Company, the Employee will be entitled to severance as provided for in the Agreement, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll policies.





2.  The Employee’s title as President and CEO of the Company beyond the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) (the “Next Annual Board Meeting”) is subject to the approval by the Board of such titles at such Next Annual Board Meeting.





3.  The Employee’s service as a director of the Company is subject to the right of the policyholders to elect and remove directors pursuant to applicable law and the Company’s by-laws.





4.  All references in the Agreement to the Employee serving as a consultant are deleted.  Accordingly, effective January 1, 2010, the Employee will serve as an employee of the Company and will provide employment services, including, without limitation, services relating to strategic planning, regulatory compliance, reinsurance, industry relations, product development and auditing, and other specified duties as established by the Board, subject to the right to the Company to terminate his employment with or without cause and the obligation to pay severance, as provided for in the Agreement, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll policies.





5.  Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.





COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY








By: /s/Barry Goldstein


Barry Goldstein, Chairman of the Board






/s/ John D. Reiersen


John D. Reiersen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              88
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                       275
<INVENTORY>                                        707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,652
<PP&E>                                          79,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,300
<BONDS>                                        118,347
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,581)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,064
<SALES>                                         19,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (136)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,182)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (30.9)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (30.9)


</TABLE>
No. 10-5949.

#### John Steven Spisak, Petitioner v. Nevada.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 986,

178 L. Ed. 2d 815,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 110.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 420, 178 L. Ed. 2d 327, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8321.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe annual report of Quixote Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the Annual Period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the officersof the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to suchofficer’s knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:    September 10, 2007 | /s/ Leslie J. Jezuit                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       | Leslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                       |                                      |   |
|                                       |                                      |   |
| Date:    September 10, 2007 | /s/ Daniel P. Gorey                       |   |
|                                       | Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  |   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

----
No. 10-5183.

#### Kelvin Stewart, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida, Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1092, 131 S. Ct. 794,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9492.

178 L. Ed. 2d 533,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 275.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  report of GiveMePower  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William V. Walton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to  GiveMePower  Corporation  and will be retained by  GiveMePower
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Date: February 20, 2007                   By: /s/ WILLIAM V. WALTON
                                          -------------------------
                                          William V. Walton
                                          Chief Financial Officer