alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The HONORABLE E. RICHARD WEBBER, United States District Judge for *

the Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1442

___________

Charles A. Trobaugh, *

*

Movant - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

State of Iowa, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 16, 1998

Filed: February 17, 1998

___________

Before LOKEN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and WEBBER, District Judge. *

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Charles A. Trobaugh filed a Motion for a Writ of Error Coram

Nobis in the district court, arguing that an expired Iowa state court conviction that had

been used to enhance his federal sentence should be vacated because of an involuntary

guilty plea, ineffective assistance of counsel, and a due process/equal protection
The HONORABLE RONALD E. LONGSTAFF, United States District Judge 1

for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

violation during state post-conviction proceedings. The district court dismissed the

1

motion, concluding that the writ of coram nobis is not available if the petitioner is still

in federal custody, and that the writ may not be used to challenge a state court

conviction in federal court. Trobaugh appeals. After careful consideration, we agree

with the district court that the writ of coram nobis may not be used to collaterally attack

a state court conviction in this manner. Moreover, even if the district court had

jurisdiction to consider a collateral attack on the expired state court conviction in

question, “there is no federal constitutional right to collaterally attack a prior conviction

used to enhance a sentence on any constitutional ground other than failure to appoint

counsel for an indigent defendant.” Partee v. Hopkins, 30 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir.

1994), applying Custis v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1732 (1994).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Singh, Petitioner,*

No. 91834-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70639-0-I, May 18, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1028. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 10-7886.

#### Thomas Douglas, IV, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1190, 131 S. Ct. 1024,

178 L. Ed. 2d 847,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 779.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 161.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37374-37375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-280-000]


Warren Transportation, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, Warren Transportation, Inc. 
(WTI), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with an effective date of 
August 1, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 95
First Revised Sheet No. 148
First Revised Sheet No. 155
First Revised Sheet No. 156
First Revised Sheet No. 166

    WTI states that it is submitting these revised tariff sheets to 
incorporate the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) Version 1.2 
Standards adopted by Order No. 587-G. WTI proposes on August 1, 1998 
effective date for these sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 37375]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18369 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000034046
<NAME> EXOLON-ESK COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                            5093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5526
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                      14120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24670
<PP&E>                                           77637
<DEPRECIATION>                                   54996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   58530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        442
<COMMON>                                          1026
<OTHER-SE>                                       28918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     58530
<SALES>                                          50482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 50482
<CGS>                                            43922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (484)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2026)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)


</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2261

To amend section 922 of title 18, United States Code, to make unlawful

a person’s failure to comply with firearm purchase requirements after

moving to a new State of residence.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 922 of title 18, United States Code, to

make unlawful a person’s failure to comply with firearm

purchase requirements after moving to a new State of

residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Gun Control

5 Enforcement Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2261 IS

1 SEC. 2. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FIREARM PURCHASE

2 REQUIREMENTS IN NEW STATE OF RESI3 DENCE.

4 Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to trans8 port or cause to be transported into a State and thereafter

9 to possess in the State a firearm any part or component

10 of which has been transported in or has been the object

11 of a transaction affecting interstate commerce if—

12 ‘‘(A) the law of the State into which the firearm

13 is transported requires a person to obtain a permit

14 to purchase a firearm; and

15 ‘‘(B)(i) within 10 business days after entering

16 the State with intent to reside in the State for a pe17 riod of more than 30 days, the person does not sub18 mit an application for such a permit, or another per19 mit for which the standards and procedures for ap20 proval are equivalent to a permit to purchase; or

21 ‘‘(ii) such an application has been denied, and

22 a period of more than 5 business days has elapsed

23 since the person received notice of the denial.’’.

Æ
No. 10-5453.

#### Donald Edward Beaty, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7193.

178 L. Ed. 2d 196,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, denied.
EPA Reg. No. 71532-27

part 2
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: November 21, 2005       /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
*DoD 4000.25-M-7, December 2003*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

**DIC FN1/FN2/GN1/GN2 FORMAT**

**ACCESSORIAL AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BILLINGS**

134

APPENDIX 3.19

1
I can come, 

and I have to

 leave by...

No, thank you.

Maybe 

another day.

I can host, and 

I need volunteers 

to help with...

I don’t feel 

comfortable 

talking about 

that right 

now.

I appreciate 

the invite, but this 

year I’ll be staying 

at home.

My body is 

not a topic for 

discussion.

I feel 

uncomfortable 

when...

I’m not 

discussing 

politics.

Thank you for 

thinking of me, 

but I can’t.

Healthy Holiday Boundaries 

Setting boundaries with people can reduce your stress level 

and increase your joy during the holidays. Above are some 

empowering phrases to help you set limits with kindness. 

B-P1165E (9/23) ©2023 Magellan Health, Inc. Source: Healthwise

Help is available. Contact your Employee Assistance Program at

MagellanAscend.com or 1-866-580-9046 (TTY 711).
AFTER A STROKE FROM 

SMOKING, GET USED 

TO LOSING YOUR

INDEPENDENCE.

Suzy, Age 62, Diagnosed at 57

New York 

Son Daniel, Caregiver

Smoking causes immediate damage to your body.

For Suzy, it triggered blood clots that caused her stroke.

You can quit. For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW
# C_2015381EN.01000801.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Skerdjan Celaj

(Case C-290/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Return of illegally staying third-country nationals - Return decision accompanied by an entry ban of three years’ duration - Breach of an entry ban - Third-country national previously removed - Sentence of imprisonment in case of new unlawful entry into the national territory - Compatibility))

(2015/C 381/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Firenze

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Skerdjan Celaj

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals must be interpreted as not, in principle, precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for the imposition of a prison sentence on an illegally staying third-country national who, after having been returned to his country of origin in the context of an earlier return procedure, unlawfully re-enters the territory of that State in breach of an entry ban.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2418

HELEN C. VELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-561-WMN) Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: March 8, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Helen C. Vello, Appellant Pro Se. Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Sendek Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Helen C. Vello appeals the district court’s order denying her civil action alleging Postmaster General William J. Henderson failed to comply with an order issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vello v. Henderson , No. CA-01-561-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.L.D.L.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00826-CV

Trial court case number: 14-FD-2183

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

On November 17, 2015, appellant, P.D., filed an affidavit of indigence in this 

Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(2). The trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record in this 

cause on October 13, 2015, and filed a supplemental clerk’s record on indigence on 

December 9, 2015. The supplemental clerk’s record reflects that the trial court clerk 

received the affidavit of indigence from this Court on November 19, 2015, and that no

contest to the affidavit of indigence was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e). Therefore, the 

allegations in the affidavit are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without 

advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f).

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to make an entry in this Court’s records 

that appellant is indigent and is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment 

of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f), (n).

It is further ORDERED that the court reporter file with this Court, within 20 

days of the date of this order and at no cost to appellant, a reporter’s record.

On November 3, 2015, the Clerk of this Court received from appellant a letter that 

she asks the Court to consider as her brief to decide the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a). The letter, however, does not meet the requirements for a brief set out in Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Additionally, the letter does 

not contain either an acknowledgment of service by the person served with a copy of the 

letter or a certificate of service of the letter on all parties to the termination proceeding. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a) (requiring service of documents on parties to proceeding), (d) 

(requiring document to include proof of service on parties to proceeding), (e) (setting out 
requirements of certificate of service). Accordingly, appellant is ORDERED to file her 

appellant’s brief complying with the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

including rules 9.5 and 38.1, within 20 days of the date a reporter’s record is filed in 

this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1, 38.6(a).

Appellee’s brief, if any, is due within 20 days of the date that appellant’s brief is 

filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

Because this appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship, the 

Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of September 28, 

2015, the date the notice of appeal was filed in this proceeding, so far as reasonably 

possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted in Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. F 

app. (West 2013). Accordingly, no extensions will be granted absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 11, 2015
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        8
        
        9
        
        10
        
        11
        
        12 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35227-35228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1218-DR]


South Dakota; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of South Dakota, (FEMA-1218-DR), dated June 1, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of South Dakota, is hereby amended to include Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance in the following area determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of June 1, 1998: Day County for Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used

[[Page 35228]]

for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 
83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, 
Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, 
Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance 
Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant Program.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-17245 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
----

----

| 1. | the                quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.,                for the                period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon                Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                   |                                    |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                   |
|                                  |                              |                               |
| Dated January                20, 2007 |                                   | /s/ Fred                M. Montano |
|                                       | Fred                M. Montano,        |
|                                       | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

----