alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Darrell B. Lee, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 14, 2007

 

 
| /s/ Darrell B. Lee                            |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Darrell B. Lee                                |
| Chief Financial Officer  and Vice President   |
| (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

 

----
No. 10-7940.

#### Reinaldo Morales, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1028,

178 L. Ed. 2d 849,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 664.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Dated: June 23, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Donald J. RadkoskiDonald J. RadkoskiChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AND

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 169

Customer Relationship Management Transformation

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and the American Federation of Government Employees 

Council 169 (AFGE) (collectively, the Parties) enter into this Memorandum of Agreement 

(Agreement) for the implementation and deployment of the ServiceNow (SNOW) application 

which replaces the SAP Customer Relationship Management (CRM) application as part of the 

CRM Transformation. This will modernize existing CRM Service capabilities to improve 

overall collaboration, management, and resolution of customer inquiries. 

The Parties agree: 

1. Management will provide monthly updates to AFGE Council 169 until the system is 

deployed.

2. Management will address employee concerns on a case by case basis.

3. Employees may use the Journal function in DPMAP, to capture their concerns, if they 

choose.

4. Employees may ask for additional help, additional training (which would be the same 

training), and there will be a practice environment in the system for the employees to 

become more comfortable in the use of the system. 

5. For the first 90 days after deployment, if there are concerns with employee 

performance related to the implementation of the system, the supervisor will meet with 

the employee (and Union Representative, if requested) to determine if additional 

training is required. If addition training is required, the supervisor may adjust 

production requirements during the initial retraining effort. A Union Representative will 

be permitted, if requested, to attend performance counseling meetings following 

deployment of the system if the meeting is regarding deficiencies related to the use of 

the system.

For the Union: For the Agency: 

_____//s//_________5/25/2021_ ____//s//______5/28/2021__ 

Frank D. Rienti, Jr. Date Billie W. Keeler Date 

President, AFGE Council 169 Acting Director, DLA 

Human Resources
No. 10-7952.

#### Jason E. Kurtz, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1029,

178 L. Ed. 2d 850,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 654.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I, denied.

Same case below, 321 Wis. 2d 478, 774 N.W.2d 476.
No. 10-7703.

#### Francisco Navarro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1159, 131 S. Ct. 960,

178 L. Ed. 2d 791,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 74.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 529.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# R 

# g"-o c**~;":** 

# c 3 2015 HEAFW\lG DOCKET In TheMatter Of: BEACH AVIATION, LLC Respondent. Docket No. FAA-2015-1325 Judge J.E. Sullivan
FAA Case No. 2013S0950071

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN Pursuant to the Judge's September 3, 2015, Order, the parties hereby submit the following proposed scheduling/discoveryplan: December 10,2015: Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference January 8, 2016: Deadline for Initial Disclosures January 11,2016: General Discovery Begins; parties mayinitiate written discovery; parties mayissue Notices ofDeposition February 5, 2016: Beginning ofdeposition period (expert or non-expert) February 26, 2016: Deadline for initial expert disclosures April 15, 2016: Deadline to issue deposition notices and/or request subpoenas for thirdparty depositions June 10, 2016: End ofdeposition period (expert ornon-expert) June 24, 2016: Deadline to issue written discovery requests; deadline for supplemental expert witness reports July 29, 2016: Close ofgeneral discovery; all discoveryresponses due bythis date; remaining discovery time available onlyto resolve disputes on existing discovery
IAugust 26, 2016: Final Close ofDiscovery September 9, 2016: Dispositive Motion Deadline September 23, 2016: Deadlineto Respond to DispositiveMotions September 30,2016: Deadline for Replies in Support ofDispositive Motions November 2016: Motion Conference on Dispositive Motions December 2016 orJanuary 2017: Pre-Hearing Conference February 3, 2017: Deadline for exchange ofwitness lists and exhibits February 24, 2017: Deadline to file written stipulations and/or motions in limine Spring 2017: Hearing 

## t-4 Respectfully submitted this

# L day ofDecember, 2015,

# ~.a£~ Attorney Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I hereby certify that the foregoing Joint Proposed Scheduling Planwas sent: original and one copy via Federal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000
one copy via Federal Express and facsimile to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 facsimile: (202) 366-7536
one copyvia Federal Express and email to: Charles Brady Beach Aviation, LLC, Respondent 

### 3700 Airport Road Suite 405 BocaRaton, FL 33431 chasbwi@gmail.com

Program Analyst

Dated

3
# Land and Maritime leaders brief Director during visit

/ Published Nov. 12, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
#### *Williams Place, LLC, Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Transp., Respondent,*

No. 91704-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31681-5-III, April 14, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 67. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00222

- CR

Jacob Cory GONZALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8528A

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
Exhibit 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  June 28, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Tod P. SpornhauerTod P. SpornhauerChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent such certification is
explicitly incorporated by reference in such filing.
# K2TIPV02882962

# K2TIPV10892178

# K2TIPV11112037

# K2TIPV11452320

# K2TIPV11792325

# K2TIPV11992368

# K2TIPV11402319

# K2TIPV20192060

# K2TIPV20192061

# K2TIPV20542071

# K2TIPV20602072

# K2TIPV31232006

# K2TIPV32592001

# K2TIPV40512022

# K2TIPV40512023

# K2TIPV40862012

# K2TIPV41142004

# K2TIPV41142007

# K2TIPV41142008

# K2TIPV41142010

# K2TIPV41142011

# K2TIPV41282026

# K2TIPV41282027

# K2TIPV41282028

# K2TIPV41282030

# K2TIPV41532039

# K2TIPV42382019

# K2TIPV42662958

# K2TIPV43242002

# K2TIPV43242003

# K2TIPV43242009

# K2TIPV43242018

# K2TIPV43242032

# K2TIPV43242034

# K2TIPV43242044

# K2TIPV43242045

# K2TIPV43242046

# K2TIPV43242047

# K2TIPV43242048

# K2TIPV43242049

# K2TIPV43242050

# K2TIPV43242051

# K2TIPV43522059

# K2TIPV50212062

# K2TIPV50212063

# K2TIPV50212064

# K2TIPV50212065

# K2TIPV50282066

# K2TIPV50352069

# K2TIPV50422070
No. 10-6430.

#### Kala B. White, Petitioner v. Amy Hathaway, et al.

562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 604,

178 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8832.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 4556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1911]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Advisory Board

AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41, Code 
of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), and following consultation 
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental 
Management Advisory Board will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning January 23, 2012.
    The Board provides advice and recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for Environmental Management (EM) on a broad range of 
corporate issues affecting the EM program. These issues include, but 
are not limited to, project management and oversight activities, cost/
benefit analyses, program performance, human capital development, and 
contracts and acquisition strategies. Recommendations to EM on the 
programmatic resolution of numerous difficult issues will help achieve 
EM's objective of the safe and efficient cleanup of its contaminated 
sites.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Environmental Management Advisory 
Board has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the 
Department's mission and to be in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed the Department of Energy by law 
and agreement. The Board will operate in accordance with the provisions 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and rules and regulations issued 
in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kristen G. Ellis, Designated 
Federal Officer, by telephone at (202) 586-5810 or by email at: 
kristen.ellis@em.doe.gov.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 23, 2012.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-1911 Filed 1-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
No. 10-6085.

#### Robert Lee Martin, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1009, 131 S. Ct. 515,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8638.

178 L. Ed. 2d 381,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2013352EN.01002201.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/22

---

Action brought on 9 October 2013 — Abertis Telecom and Retevisión I v Commission

(Case T-541/13)

2013/C 352/41

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Abertis Telecom, SA (Barcelona, Spain) and Retevisión I, SA (Barcelona) (represented by: L. Cases Pallarés, J. Buendía Sierra, N. Ruiz García, A. Lamadrid de Pablo, M. Muñoz de Juan and M. Reverter Baquer, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and, in particular, Article 1 thereof, in so far as it declares there to be State aid incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, in particular, Article 1 thereof, in so far as it declares there to be State aid incompatible with the internal market;

| — | consequently, annul the recovery orders set out in Articles 3 and 4 of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul the recovery orders set out in Articles 3 and 4 of the contested decision;

| — | order, by way of a measure of organisation of procedure, the Commission to produce the cost report submitted by ASTRA; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order, by way of a measure of organisation of procedure, the Commission to produce the cost report submitted by ASTRA; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in the present case is the same as that in Case T-462/13 Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi v Commission.

Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi

Commission

The applicants raise the same pleas in support of their action as those raised in the aforecited case.

---
#### *State, Respondent, v. Sanchez, Petitioner,*

No. 92245-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32786-8-III, August 11, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1032. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-225-001]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to be effective June 
22, 1998.

Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 1810

    On May 22, 1998, Koch filed the Sixth Revised Sheet No. 1810 to the 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1. The proposed revision reflected changes and 
clarifications to the calculation of the Average Storage Rate for the 
purposes of economically scheduling Interruptible Storage Service 
(ISS). On June 19, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Accepting 
Tariff Sheets Subject to Conditions rejecting Koch's proposed changes 
to the Average Storage Rate, while accepting Koch's proposed 
clarifications to the definition of the average fuel rate. 
Specifically, the Commission accepted Koch's valuation of fuel in the 
Average Storage Rate as the fuel reimbursement price posted monthly on 
Koch's EBB.
    In compliance with the Commission's order of June 19, 1998, Koch 
submits for filing Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 1810 to the Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1 reinstating the previous provision for calculating 
the Average Storage Rate as stated on the Fourth Revised Sheet No. 
1810. Also included is a provision defining the valuation of fuel in 
the Average Storage Rate as the fuel reimbursement price posted monthly 
on Koch's EBB.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18187 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Kenneth Wylie

No. 06

- 21

- 00092

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Morriss

, Justice Burgess and Justice

Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 24, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. John Soldoveri, Totowa, New Jersey; to acquire additional voting 
shares of Greater Community Bancorp, Totowa, New Jersey, and thereby 
indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Great Falls Bank, 
Totowa, New Jersey, and Bergen Commercial Bank, Paramus, New Jersey.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, Manager 
of Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, 
San Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Peter F. Stanton, Spokane, Washington; to acquire additional 
voting shares of W.T.B. Financial Corporation, Spokane, Washington, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Washington Trust Bank, Spokane, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 6, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18283 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F