alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**LOGISTICS RESPONSE TIMES (LRT)**

## DLA Special Report Fill Type Table

The procedure to determine the contents of the CORP FILL field is really in****three parts.  The first part relies upon status codes; the second uses the MSOS file and PIIN contents; and the last decision is based on the RDD.  A temporary CORP FILL table in three parts is used.  The first entity in the table is the CORP FILL desired as a result of checking status and the status date is also saved.  The next entity is determined by the MSOS/PIIN contents.  The CORP FILL determined by this section is saved in the second table entry.  The advice codes are then checked for BV or BZ or a DOCID of AB.  If one of these is found, the date from the status document is also saved in the second table entry.  Finally, the RDD is checked for S or X as the first character and, if found, the third table entry will have a fill code of H and the date field will be the Date of Birth.

The date fields are then compared to each other and the latest (most recent) date is saved along with the contents of its CORP FILL area.  If a CORP FILL entry was present for this item, then that CORP FILL is used for this LRT record.  However, if the HOLD CORP area is blank, then the LRT CORP FILL is set to A.

**1st Routine Used to Determine CORP FILL**

**Routine Used to Determine CORP FILL for Service ICP of SMS**

***Please Note:**  No date has been set in the table hold area yet.  The date will only be set if we have a BV or BZ status document or we have a DOCID of AB_.

Now all three status field supplied by LOTS are checked for the BV or BZ or for a DOCID of AB_.  If any of these are found, the corresponding date will be moved to the table.

******   Method 2 is only used for reporting and is not set in the files.

**1st Routine Used to Determine CORP FILL**

If the RDD field starts with an X or S, then the third entry in the table is established with a CORP FILL of H and the record Date of Birth is used as the status date.

Now all three entries are checked and the entry with the latest date (i.e., most recent) is selected.  If the table CORP FILL entry is present for this selected date, it is then moved to the LRT record as the CORP FILL entry.  If there is no entry ( i.e., no date fields were filled in) then the CORP FILL is set to A and the DVD indicator is blanked.  The DVD indicator is also checked and if any of the statuses are BV or BZ, or the PIIN is present, then the DVD Indicator is set to D.

www.dla.mil/j-6/dlmso/eLibrary/Documents/PMPRC/DLA_Corp_fill_rules.docx

Updated on 04/04/2014				1 of 4
No. 10-345.

#### Deniz Cinar Aydiner, Petitioner v. Oregon.

562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 530,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8647.

178 L. Ed. 2d 374,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 228 Or. App. 282, 208 P.3d 515.
# C_2016068EN.01001201.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

(Case C-342/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Recognition of professional qualifications - Directive 2005/36/EC - Article 5 - Freedom to provide services - Directive 2006/123/EC - Articles 16 and 17(6) - Article 56 TFEU - Tax consultancy company established in a Member State and providing services in another Member State - Legislation of a Member State requiring the registration and recognition of tax consultancy companies))

(2016/C 068/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X-Steuerberatungsgesellschaft

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of Article 56 TFEU, legislation of a Member State which defines the conditions of access to the activity of professional assistance in tax matters may not restrict the freedom to provide services of a tax consultancy company — formed in accordance with the law of another Member State in which that company is established, which draws up, in the latter Member State where tax consultancy work is not regulated, a tax return on behalf of a recipient of services in the first Member State and sends that tax return to the tax authority of the first Member State —, without the qualification obtained by that company, or by the natural persons providing services of professional assistance in tax matters for that company, in other Member States being accorded its proper value and being duly taken into account.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2955 

To prevent the issuance of grants to entities that impose an unreasonable 

condition on or unjust discrimination against an air carrier operating 

pursuant to a contract with a Government agency, including United 

States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. PALMER (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. FLORES, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. BABIN, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. STEWART, Mr. 

ROUZER, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, 

Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. 

BUCK, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. WALKER, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. DUNN, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. MITCHELL, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. WRIGHT, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. 

KING of Iowa, Mr. BUDD, Mr. YOHO, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. DAVIDSON of Ohio, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. JOHN W. 

ROSE of Tennessee, and Mr. BERGMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prevent the issuance of grants to entities that impose 

an unreasonable condition on or unjust discrimination 

against an air carrier operating pursuant to a contract 

with a Government agency, including United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2955 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting Local Air5 ports from Neglecting Enforcement Act’’ or the ‘‘PLANE 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF GRANTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, if the Secretary of Transportation determines 

10 that the sponsor of a public-use airport has violated a cov11 ered grant assurance, the Secretary may not issue a grant 

12 under chapter 471 of title 49, United States Code, to such 

13 sponsor for any fiscal year in which the violation of the 

14 covered grant assurance occurs. 

15 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi16 nitions apply: 

17 (1) COVERED GRANT ASSURANCE.—The term 

18 ‘‘covered grant assurance’’ means a grant assurance 

19 made under— 

20 (A) section 47107(a)(1) of title 49, United 

21 States Code, if the violation is related to an un22 reasonable condition imposed on or unjust dis23 crimination against an air carrier operating 

24 pursuant to a contract with a Government 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2955 IH

1 agency, including United States Immigration 

2 and Customs Enforcement; and 

3 (B) section 47107(a)(11) of title 49, 

4 United States Code. 

5 (2) OTHER TERMS.—The terms ‘‘sponsor’’ and 

6 ‘‘public-use airport’’ have the meanings given such 

7 terms in section 47102 of title 49, United States 

8 Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2948 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in St. Augustine, Florida, as the ‘‘Leo C. Chase Jr. Department 

of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. RUTHERFORD (for himself and Mr. WALTZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in St. Augustine, Florida, as the 

‘‘Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEO C. CHASE JR. DEPART4 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CLINIC. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community-based outpatient 

6 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 

7 207 Stratton Road, St. Augustine, Florida, shall after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2948 IH

1 as the ‘‘Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of Veterans Affairs 

2 Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leo C. Chase Jr. De7 partment of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE I, Jeffrey R. Mistarz, the Chief Financial Officer of Electric City Corp.,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Electric
City Corp. and its subsidiaries. /s/ Jeffrey R. Mistarz  
 -28-
##### 



Exhibit 99.08

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xchange, Inc., (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                   
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Christopher Wagner                                                                                         
| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                   
| |  |     |  | Name: J. Christopher Wagner
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Finance
and Accounting Officer

Dated: November 15, 2002
No. 10-7995.

#### Thomas Horton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1193, 131 S. Ct. 1032,

178 L. Ed. 2d 852,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 702.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 936.
IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO WORK,

Don’t let anyone take it away.

If you have a legal right to

work in the United States,

there are laws to protect

you against discrimination

in the workplace.

You should know that –

No employer can deny you a job or

fire you because of your national

origin or citizenship status.

In most cases employers cannot

require you to be a U.S. citizen or

permanent resident or refuse any

legally acceptable documents.

If any of these things have

happened to you, you may

have a valid charge of

discrimination that can be

filed with the OSC. Contact

the OSC for assistance in

your own language.

Call 1-800-255-7688. TDD

for the hearing impaired is

1-800-237-2515.

In the Washington, D.C.,

area, please call

202-616-5594, TDD

202-616-5525

Or write to:

The Office of Special Counsel

Civil Rights Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 27728,

Washington, DC 20038-7728

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division

Office of Special Counsel for

Immigration-Related Unfair

Employment Practices
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Nelson Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John J. Delury, J.H.O.), rendered September 21, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating New York Public Health Law ยง 229, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (John J. DeLury, J.H.O.), rendered September 21, 2017, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.</p><p>The notably terse and ambiguous plea colloquy underlying defendant's Summons Part conviction fails to establish that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. The court did not address defendant during the plea proceeding, nor was defendant advised of any constitutional rights he was waiving (<i>see People v Moore</i>, 24 NY3d 1030 [2014]; <i>People v Tyrell</i>, 22 NY3d 359, 365-366 [2013]). Given the relatively minor nature of the infraction here charged, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of remanding the matter (<i>see People v Burwell</i>, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 14, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2483 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2483

        To amend the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Heflin) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 
                                Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To amend the Small Business Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minority Small Business Preservation 
Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GRADUATIONS.

    Section 7(j)(10)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(j)(10)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) A small business concern that, as of 
                        October 1, 1993, is participating in any 
                        program or activity conducted under this 
                        paragraph or is eligible for the award of 
                        contracts pursuant to section 8(a), shall be 
                        permitted continued participation in such 
                        program or activity and continued eligibility 
                        under section 8(a), until the later of--
                                    ``(I) 365 days after the date on 
                                which final regulations are issued to 
                                implement a law establishing 
                                appropriate terms for participation in 
                                the Program by industry sector, based 
                                on the study conducted pursuant to 
                                section 10(i); or
                                    ``(II) the date on which such 
                                participation and eligibility would 
                                otherwise expire under this 
                                subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-7262.

#### Debby Rose, Petitioner v. Cox Health Systems, et al.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 929,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 371,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 573.
# C_2015311EN.01001201.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-468/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Articles 2(4) and 8 - Prohibition on the sale of tobacco for oral use - Loose ‘Snus’ (oral tobacco)))

(2015/C 311/13)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga and M. Clausen, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Thorning and M. Wolff, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | declares that, by having continued to authorise the sale of loose ‘snus’ (oral tobacco), the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(4) in conjunction with Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products, and |
| --- | --- |

1)

declares that, by having continued to authorise the sale of loose ‘snus’ (oral tobacco), the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(4) in conjunction with Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products, and

| 2) | orders Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

orders Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.

1

---
# Schedule B3

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12SPE4A6-15-R-0340		&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Schedule B3
#### State, Respondent, v. Oates, Petitioner,

No. 91947-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46156-1-II, June 9, 2015. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-06-11T15:31:31Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-06-11T15:31:34Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-06-11T15:31:34Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="39602">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-06-11T15:31:31Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
QIIOVRI) Sm.LrnI, AUSTIN 
</p>
<p>AYTO”“rn” 0.rl.m.n. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
No. 10-8061.

#### Cazzie L. Williams, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1063,

178 L. Ed. 2d 876,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 995.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 561.
No. 10-313.

#### Talk America, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T Michigan.

562 U.S. 1198, 131 S. Ct. 1061,

178 L. Ed. 2d 861,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 961.

January 24, 2011.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appen*862dix granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.