[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36276-36277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251]


Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4; Environmental Assessment and 
Finding of No Significant Impact

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulation Commission (the Commission) is 
considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
regulations to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41 for 
the Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4, respectively, issued to the 
Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee).

Environmental Assessment

Identification of Proposed Action

    The proposed action is in response to the licensee's application 
dated March 5, 1998, for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
50.71(e)(4) regarding submission of revisions to the updated Final 
Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). Under the proposed exemption, the 
licensee would schedule updates to a single, unified FSAR for the two 
units based on the refueling cycle of Unit 4 and at intervals not to 
exceed 24 months.

The Need for the Proposed Action

    The Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4), requires 
licensees to submit updates to their FSAR annually or within 6 months 
after each refueling outage providing that the interval between 
successive updates does not exceed 24 months. Since Units 3 and 4 share 
a common FSAR, the licensee must update the same document annually or 
within 6 months after a refueling outage for either unit. The 
underlying purpose of the rule was to relieve licensees of the burden 
of filing annual FSAR revisions while assuring that such revisions are 
made at least every 24 months. The Commission reduced the burden, in 
part, by permitting a licensee to submit its FSAR revisions 6 months 
after refueling outages for its facility, but did not provide for 
multiple unit facilities sharing a common FSAR in the rule. Rather, the 
Commission stated: ``With respect to the concern about multiple 
facilities sharing a common FSAR, licensees will have maximum 
flexibility for scheduling updates on a case-by-case basis.'' 57 FR 
39355 (1992). Allowing the exemption would maintain the updated FSAR 
current within 24 months of the last revision.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
and concludes that it involves administrative activities unrelated to 
plant operation.
    The proposed action will not result in an increase in the 
probability or consequences of accidents or result in a change in 
occupational exposure or offsite dose. Therefore, there are no 
significant radiological impacts associated with the proposed action.
    The proposed action will not result in a change in nonradiological 
plant effluents and will have no other nonradiological environmental 
impact.

[[Page 36277]]

    Accordingly, the Commission concludes there are no significant 
environmental impacts associated with this action.

Alternative to the Proposed Action

    Since the Commission has concluded that there is no significant 
environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the exemption would 
result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental 
impacts of the proposed exemption and this alternative are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

    This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement related to 
Turkey Point Plant dated July 1972.

Agencies and Persons Contacted

    In accordance with its stated policy, on May 28, 1998, the staff 
consulted with the Florida State official, Mr. William A. Passetti, 
Chief, Office of Radiation Control, regarding the environmental impact 
of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

    Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
proposed exemption.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's 
request for the exemption dated March 5, 1998, which is available for 
public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Library, Florida International University, 
University Park Campus, Miami, Florida 33199.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of June 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frederick J. Hebdon,
Director, Project Directorate II-3, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-17605 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-1-M