alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Bark, Richard A. [Richard_Bark@fmi.com]

Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:47 PM

To: McKaughan, Colleen

Subject: RE: New Court-Ordered Deadline for Arizona Regional Haze FIP

Colleen: 

Thank you for the update. Freeport-McMoRan will be submitting written comments to the EPA’s 

proposal next week (by March 6) and we will provide you with a direct copy. We will also contact you 

after that time regarding any additional information that may be of use to EPA. If you have any 

questions or need anything in the meantime, please feel free contact me by email or on my mobile 

phone (602-376-7245). 

Thank you. 

Richard 

From: McKaughan, Colleen [mailto:McKaughan.Colleen@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:44 PM

To: Bark, Richard A.

Cc: Nudd, Gregory; GLASS, GEOFFREY; Chen, Eugene; Kelly, Shaheerah; Webb, Thomas; 

ecm@azdeq.gov

Subject: New Court-Ordered Deadline for Arizona Regional Haze FIP

Dear Richard,

I’m writing to let you know that the court-ordered deadline for EPA to propose a Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) addressing regional haze in Arizona has been extended to September 

6, 2013. Our deadline for final action on Arizona’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) remains July 

15, 2013. The deadline for commenting on our December 20, 2012 proposed action on 

Arizona’s SIP is March 6, 2013.

If EPA finalizes disapproval of any aspect of the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, we are obligated to 

propose and later finalize a FIP to address these disapproved portions. The deadlines for these 

proposed and final actions are set in a consent decree. The parties to the consent decree 

recently agreed to extend these deadlines and the United States District Court for the District of 

Columbia issued an order granting a motion to amend the consent decree to reflect these new 

deadlines. The new deadlines of September 6, 2013 for the proposed action and February 6, 

2014 for the final action provide the agency more time for the technical work that will form the 

basis of the FIP. 

If you are planning to provide technical information that you think would be helpful to EPA in 

preparing our FIP proposal, please provide that information no later than May 10, 2013. This 

will allow us enough time to review and consider the information in preparing the proposal.

In the case of the equipment you identified as BART-eligible (the electric furnace, the four 

Hoboken converters, and the remelt/mold pouring vessel) in Gila County, Arizona, we are 
particularly interested in getting your feedback regarding the effectiveness of existing SO2

controls and the estimated costs of installing more effective SO2 controls and increasing the 

effectiveness of existing controls. We are also interested in the costs of installing lower NOxemitting combustion equipment and the expected emission reductions associated with such an 

upgrade. You may also propose your own five factor BART analyses for SO2 and NOx for the 

BART-eligible units.

If you have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Colleen McKaughan
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00303

- CR

Daniel Garcia v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- 12

- 13,453

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 18 , 2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amendment (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 8, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Bldg, Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Philip Washko, PhD, DMD.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 20, 1998.
    Time: 1:30 PM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Bldg, Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Philip Washko, PhD, DMD.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 28, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Bldg, Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Philip Washko, PhD, DMD.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-18634 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Rev H

# Rev G

# Rev F

# Rev E

# Rev D

# Rev C

# Rev B

# Rev A

# Baseline
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2019

No. 04-18-00447-CR

Raul Daniel NORRIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9017

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The panel has considered Appellant’s motion for rehearing; the motion is DENIED. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
1 of 1 

ADC 232 

Attachment 

ATTACHMENT TO ADC 232 

Administrative Update to MILSTRAP and DLMS to Clarify that Supply Condition 

Code (SCC) Q is Authorized for Turn-in to Defense Reutilization and Marketing

1. ORIGINATOR: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO). Ms. Mary 

Jane Johnson, DLMSO, MILSTRAP Administrator, e-mail: Mary.Jane.Johnson@dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply 

3. REQUESTED CHANGE: 

 a. Title: Administrative Update to MILSTRAP and DLMS to Clarify that Supply 

Condition Code Q is Authorized for Turn-in to Defense Reutilization and Marketing 

 b. Description of Change: Administrative update to revise the MILSTRAP AP 2.5 (and 

corresponding DLMS Data Dictionary) for Supply Condition Codes to add SCC Q to the list 

of SCCs that can be sent to the Defense Reutilization And Marketing Office (DRMO), in 

support of current procedures. 

 c. Procedures: Revise DOD 4000.25-2-M, MILSTRAP, AP 2.5, Supply Condition 

Codes, explanation and corresponding footnote, which stipulates which SCCs are 

authorized to be sent to DRMO (change is identified by red, bold, italics) (DLMSO will 

make corresponding changes to the DLMS Data Dictionary): 

 “EXPLANATION: Classify materiel in terms of readiness for issue and use or to 

identify action underway to change the status of materiel. When 

materiel is determined to be in excess of approved stock levels and/or no 

longer serviceable, Supply Condition Codes A through H, Q and S will 

be utilized to reflect materiel condition prior to turn-in to the DRMO.1

 

1

Refer to DoD 4140.27-M for serviceability timeframes associated with shelf-life items. Supply 

Condition Codes J through P, R and V, will not be used for materiel turn-ins to the DRMO.” 

4. REASON FOR CHANGE: The published MILS/DLMS business rules for SCC Q 

include procedures for turn-in of SCC Q materiel to DRMO, however, the AP2.5 SCC 

appendix was not updated to identify SCC Q in the list of acceptable SCCs for turn-in to 

DRMO. This change revises the AP2.5 guidance to support the turn-in of SCC Q 

materiel to DRMO consistent with the following MILSTRAP Chapter 3, paragraph C3.4, 

and corresponding DLMS: 

MILSTRAP C3.4. ISSUE TO DRMO OF SUPPLY CONDITION CODE (SCC) Q MATERIEL. 

When an inspection or technical/engineering analysis reveals a product quality deficiency which 

prohibits further DoD use of the materiel, the ICP will direct the transfer of the materiel to the 

DRMO in SCC Q. Disposal release orders and related issue transactions for this materiel must 

cite either Management Code O (alpha) to identify deficient materiel which does not require 

mutilation or Management Code S to identify deficient materiel which requires mutilation. The 

DRMS will perform mutilation in accordance with existing guidance for the NSN/type of 

materiel. The ICP should identify to the DRMS any unique instructions for disposal requiring 

specific methods or information regarding hazardous constituents contained in the item. 

5. IMPACT: Administrative update. No known impact
*DoD 4000.25-1-M, November, 2005*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

# AP6.4. APPENDIX 6.4

**DD FORM 1348-5,NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY/SHIPMENT**

 (SAMPLE)

***1***

APPENDIX 1.4

AP6.4-1

APPENDIX 6.4

# image1.jpeg
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

Sheila Holman, Director 

Division of Air Quality 

North Carolina Deptartment of 

Environment and Natural Resources 

1641 Mail Service Center 

Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 

Dear Ms. Holman: 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

APR 1 9 2016 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2015 Air Pollution Control grant 

authorized by§ 105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments 

and their status. Since there were no issues, your report is now finalized. Thjs letter documents the 

conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.1 15 and 

identified as a commitment in your FY 2015 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Culling Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2015 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to 

protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Stuart Perry at 

(404) 562-8980 or Shantel Shelmon at (404) 562-9817. 

Enclosure 

Carol L. Kemker 

Acting Director 

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### *State, Respondent, v. Magney, Petitioner,*

No. 91783-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70323-4-1, March 9, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1016. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Nord, Petitioner,*

No. 91620-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70806-6-1, March 23, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1032. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
DLA COLUMBUS - AFGE LOCAL 1148

LOCALLY NEGOTIATED MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT

HOLIDAY WORK

1. Holiday work will be assigned/offered first through volunteers. If there are more volunteers
for a holiday than needed, the volunteer(s) with the highest SCD will be assigned to work the
holiday.

2. If there are insufficient volunteers, employees will be assigned in reverse SCD (from bottom
to top) rotational order by service computation date from a holiday roster.

n - SCHULZE.DONA soitte5ondlo. szaot70
Po / Wen hees LD.L.1230117949 2, ssosotos t2or17-aso0
ROBIN MENEFEE i DON SCHULZE
Chief Negotiator for Local 1148 Chief Negotiator for DSCC Columbus

[e/a 1/8/24

DATE DATE
i Supply Process Review Committee Meeting

lof2

http://www.dlmso.hq.dla.mil/Committees/Supply/SupplyPRCAgenda.htm

Supply Process Review Committee (PRC) Meeting 99-1 Agenda

January 25-27, 1999

. Meeting begins at 10:00 on January 25 and will end no later than 3:00 on January 27.

Meeting begins at 8:15 on Tuesday and Wednesday.
HQ Complex Conference Room 2101

Service/A gency evaluation of current process.
Requirements for extension of evaluation period.
Improvements to DAASC report format, sort sequence (Air Force),

Proposal to begin automatic downgrading (Coast Guard).

Topic Proponent
Welcome/Opening Remarks/Introductions DLMSO
| Progress Report on DLMS Implementation Status DLMSO
DEPRA Policy Changes Air Force
(Pat Cronin)
As of November 1, 1998, the AF no longer sends excess reports to DEPRA for AF
owned/managed consumables, Monday Morning
Draft Change Froposal for DAAS Edit of All DoD Requisitions for Air Force
Invalid/Expire Project Codes
Monday Morning
{ Draft Change Proposal for Removal of All Air Force "FX" Accounts Air Force
| from the DoD Materiel Obligation Validation (MOV) Program
Draft Change Proposal for Removal of All Air Force "FM" Accounts Monday Morning
| from the DoD Materiel Obligation Validation (MC )V) Program
| F/AD I Validation Implementation Status All
Discussion issues include: Tuesday Morning-

affine

Logistics Response Time Steering Group Exploring Possibility of DUSD(LRM)

Measuring Wholesale Logistics Pipeline Performance Against

Customers’ Required Delivery Dates (RDDs). Terry Trepal

Need to develop a specific proposal for identifying how well the system performs Tuesday Moatning-

relative to the customers? actual requirements for delivery/receipt of the requisitioned esaay

materiel, aM franeers

Weapon System Coding Work Group Progress DLA/AF/DLIS
Postponed to 99-2

Meeting
Draft Change Proposals Supporting Defense Security Assistance DSADC

1/22/99 12:03 PM



Supply Process Review Committee Meeting

2o0f2

Management System (DSAMS)

http:/Avww.dlmso.hq.dla.mil/Committees/Supply/SupplyPRCA genda.htm

Tuesday
Establishment of New MILSTRIP Transactions, Advice Codes, and Status Codes for
an Automated Price Quote Process.
Establishment of New MILSTRIP Transaction for Suspension of Security Assistance
requisitions and New Supply Status Codes to Report Results of the Suspension
Request. 7
Revised Requisition Modification Criteria and New Advice Code for Security we
Assistance. wi § uw =)
Establishment of New MILSTRIP Advice Code for Shelf Life Materiel destined for a
FMS customer
| Establishment of New MILSTRIP Supply Status Codes for Security
Assistance Requisitions.
10 | E-Mall Demonstration EMALL
| <7 Representatives
Wednesday
Morning
11 } Change Proposals or Waiver Requests Related to Standard Requisition EMALL
Format for EMALL: Representatives/
i AF Representatives
| In-the-Clear Shipping Address vice DoDAAC
| Wednesday
Morning

12

Project Code 3AB Discussion

[ey

Return Home.

t*

CE hey
ae"

1/22/99 12:03 PM
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-306-000]


TCP Gathering Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, TCP Gathering Company (TCP) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, First Revised Sheet No. 103A, a tariff sheet to be effective August 
1, 1998.
    TCP states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order issued on April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-1-007.
    TCP states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18356 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# DLA Distribution opens operation in Djibouti

/ Published Oct. 11, 2016
AMBOULI, Djibouti, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution cut the ribbon on its newest facility during a ceremony with logistics partners and customers September 30.  

Located in Djibouti on Camp Lemonnier, the site represents the first DLA Distribution enduring presence on the continent of Africa and a shift in U.S. Africa Command’s logistics priorities from solely expeditionary logistics to an enduring commitment at the national, strategic level.  

The new location will serve as a forward-stocking solution to the forces in the area and improve storage and distribution at Camp Lemonnier. Additionally, it will provide support to the Navy 6th Fleet transiting the Port of Djibouti.  

“This is a relatively low-key event that will end up having a very significant impact in the future of support to the forces in the Africa Command area of responsibility,” DLA Distribution Commanding General Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi told the audience. “The opening of this distribution center represents an extremely significant commitment to regional security and a demonstration of U.S. national resolve.” 

Thomas Kelly, U.S. ambassador to Djibouti, welcomed DLA Distribution and told the audience that Djibouti is a key U.S. partner in security, regional stability and humanitarian efforts across the region.

“This is a joint solution to a joint force, Paul Brown, AFRICOM deputy director for logistics, added.”

Cutting the ribbon alongside Laskodi and Kelly, were Navy Rear Adm. Trey Wheeler, deputy commander, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa; Paul Brown, AFRICOM deputy director for logistics; Navy Capt. James Black, Camp Lemonnier commanding officer; Navy Capt. Christopher Parker, Naval Supply Systems Command, Fleet Logistics Center, Sigonella; Army Col. Elizabeth Delbridge-Keough, DLA Europe and Africa commander; and Navy Cmdr. Pamela Dozier, DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, commander.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      November 9, 2009/s/
      Thomas E. D’AmbraName:
      Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.Title:
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
An equal opportunity employer 1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White Washington, DC 20005-4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202-682-8344

Fax 202-682-8270 whiter@api.org

April 26, 2012

Byron J. Bunker, Acting Division Director Compliance Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality US Environmental Protection Agency

2000 Traverwood Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

Re: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: 2 nd
Draft Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Study in Rats by Inhalation Exposure (Study No. 05-4287)

Dear Mr. Bunker:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

 2 nd Draft Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Study in Rats by Inhalation Exposure (Study No. 05-4287)

 The study director’s response to comments from EPA, the peer-reviewers, an independent quality assurance (QA) auditor, and the RG (Checklist April 24, 2012)

The RG believes the 2 nd draft is ready for final review by EPA as all significant comments have been addressed by the study director in this version. However, the RG wants to point out the following issues. 1. Upon reviewing the study director’s responses, the RG had the following additional

comments; a. The Title of Table 4 in Appendix M must be corrected. The Table is entitled, Mean Uterus Weights. The absolute value is correctly included; however, the adjusted value is not the adjusted uterine weight, but the adjusted maternal BODY weight (terminal body weight m inus gravid uterine weight). Please provide a footnote as shown in Report Table 8, and revise this table title.
b. There needs to be some indication in the final QA Statement that QA has
reviewed this report since 2006.

The RG believes that none of these issues compromise the interpretation of the results and will confirm they are corrected in the final report.April 26, 2012 Page 2 of 2

If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please

contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Enclosures on CD: 1) 2 nd Draft Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: EmbryoFetal Toxicity Study in Rats by I nhalation Exposure (Study No. 05-4287)2) The study director’s response to comments from EPA, the peerreviewers, an independent quality assurance (QA) auditor, and the RG (Checklist April 24, 2012)

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)