alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-10431.

#### Albert Murphy, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 836, 132 S. Ct. 142,

181 L. Ed. 2d 60,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5577.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

*61Same case below, 395 Ill. App. 3d 1116, 369 Ill. Dec. 493, 986 N.E.2d 806.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Pua, Petitioner,*

No. 92224-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71622-1-I, July 27, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1005. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1625

ANGELA L. G. WEINERTH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. THE MARTINSVILLE CITY SCHOOL BOARD , Defendant

- Appellee,
and ZEBEDEE TALLEY, JR.; THE MARTINSVILLE CITY COUNCIL; CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA, A Municipal Corporation,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville

. Michael F. Urbanski , Chief District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv
- 00067

- MFU )

Submitted : March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Glen Franklin Koontz, KOONTZ P.C., Berryville, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. L. Daniel, Martha White Medley, Khalilah A. Wa l ters, Michael Anthony Nicholas, DANIEL,2 MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Angela L. G. Weinerth appeals the district court’s order granting the Martinsville City School Board summary judgment on her race and gen d er discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

17 (2018), and her age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (2018)

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Weinerth v. Martinsville City Sch. Bd. , No. 4:17

- cv
- 00067

- MFU ( W .D.
Va. May 20 , 2019 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18248]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Fam Cargo International Company, Inc., 7392 NW 35th Terrace, Miami, 
FL 33152, Officer: Harold Garay, President
Boss Shipping, Inc., 8491 N.W. 17 Street, Unit 109, Miami, FL 33126, 
Officers: Sigrid Boldt, President, Maria Alicia Campos, Secretary.

    Dated: July 6, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18248 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00398-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.T.S.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 479

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant. No costs are assessed, as appellant filed an affidavit of inability to 

pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 9, 2023
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/29 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★

■ ■
■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### *State, Respondent, v. Cu Van Truong, Petitioner,*

No. 91813-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70811-2-I, April 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1012. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
*DLM 4000.25-4, August 15, 2018*

*Change 5*

**ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS**

8		 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
No. 10-1497.

#### David Bledsoe, et al., Petitioners v. Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 39,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5422.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 836.
# C_2015389EN.01003201.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2015 — VECCO and Others v Commission

(Case T-360/13) (1)

1

((REACH - Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation - Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement - Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration))

(2015/C 389/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) (Memmingen, Germany) and the other 185 applicants whose names are listed in Annex I to the judgment (represented by: C. Mereu, K. Van Maldegem, lawyers, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Talabér-Ritz and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicants: Assogalvanica (Padua, Italy) and the 31 other interveners whose names are listed in Annex II to the judgment (represented by: C. Mereu, K. Van Maldegem and J. Beck)

Interveners in support of the applicants:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere, M. Heikkilä and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 348/2013 of 17 April 2013 amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ 2013 L 108, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) and the applicants whose names are listed in Annex I to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) and the applicants whose names are listed in Annex I to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Assogalvanica and the other interveners whose names are listed in Annex II to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Assogalvanica and the other interveners whose names are listed in Annex II to bear their own costs;

| 4. | Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
**BIC SDR IPT Agenda**

**April 13-14, 2004 - HQC**
Exhibit 31.2
**Certifications**
**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Kenneth A. Corby, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under out supervisions,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end ofthe period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: June 28, 2004 /s/ Kenneth A. Corby  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has beenprovided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-7089.

#### Frank Wanko, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 623,

178 L. Ed. 2d 452,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8922.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Public Health Key Terms

clinical care: prevention, treatment, and management of illness and preservation 

of mental and physical well-being through services offered by medical and allied 

health professions; also known as health care.

determinant: factor that contributes to the generation of a trait.

epidemic: occurrence in a community or region of cases of an illness, specific 

health-related behavior, or other health-related event clearly in excess of normal 

expectancy. Both terms are used interchangeably; however, epidemic usually 

refers to a larger geographic distribution of illness or health-related events.

health outcome: result of a medical condition that directly affects the length or 

quality of a person’s life.

intervention: action or ministration that produces an effect or is intended to alter 

the course of a pathologic process.

pandemic: denoting a disease affecting or attacking the population of an 

extensive region, country, or continent.

population health: approach to health that aims to improve the health of an entire 

population.

prevention: action so as to avoid, forestall, or circumvent a happening, conclusion, 

or phenomenon (e.g., disease).
No. 10-5685 (R46-001).

#### In re Steven Wayne Goodman, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 978, 131 S. Ct. 501,

178 L. Ed. 2d 318,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8128.

October 15, 2010.

The petition for writ of mandamus in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 10-1541.

#### Dennis R., et ux., Petitioners v. Michael Clark.

565 U.S. 827, 132 S. Ct. 120,

181 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5493.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
# C_2015398EN.01000302.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Finanzamt Linz v Bundesfinanzgericht, Außenstelle Linz

(Case C-66/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 TFEU, 54 TFEU, 107 TFEU and 108(3) TFEU - Freedom of establishment - State aid - Taxation of groups of companies - Acquisition of a holding in a subsidiary - Depreciation of the goodwill - Limitation on holdings in resident companies))

(2015/C 398/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Linz

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesfinanzgericht, Außenstelle Linz

Defendant:

Parties concerned: IFN-Holding AG, IFN Beteiligungs GmbH

Parties concerned:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU precludes legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in the context of the taxation of a group of companies, allows a parent company, in the case of the acquisition of a holding in a resident company which becomes a member of such a group, to depreciate the goodwill up to a maximum of 50 % of the purchase price of the holding, while such depreciation is prohibited in the case of the acquisition of a holding in a non-resident company.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3050 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to carry 

out a study of the 10 per centum threshold limitation 

applicable to the definition of a diversified company 

under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3050 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Investment 

3 in Small Businesses Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SEC STUDY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Securities and Exchange 

6 Commission shall carry out a study of the 10 per centum 

7 threshold limitation applicable to the definition of a diver8 sified company under section 5(b)(1) of the Investment 

9 Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–5(b)(1)) and deter10 mine the impacts of such threshold limits upon the protec11 tion of investors, efficiency, competition, and capital for12 mation. 

13 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out the study re14 quired under subsection (a), the Commission shall con15 sider the following: 

16 (1) The size and number of diversified compa17 nies that are currently restricted in their ability to 

18 own more than 10 percent of the voting shares in an 

19 individual company. 

20 (2) How the investing preferences of diversified 

21 companies have shifted over time with respect to 

22 companies with smaller market capitalizations and 

23 companies in industries where competition may be 

24 limited. 

25 (3) The expected impact to small and emerging 

26 growth companies regarding the availability of capVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:43 Jul 10, 2019 Jkt 034408 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3050.RFS H3050

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3050 RFS

1 ital, related impacts on investor confidence and risk, 

2 and impacts on competition, if the threshold is in3 creased or otherwise changed. 

4 (4) The ability of registered funds to manage li5 quidity risk. 

6 (5) Any other consideration that the Commis7 sion considers necessary and appropriate for the pro8 tection of investors. 

9 (c) SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS.—In car10 rying out the study required under subsection (a), the 

11 Commission may solicit public comments. 

12 (d) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the 180-day 

13 period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

14 Commission shall issue a report to the Congress, and 

15 make such report publicly available on the website of the 

16 Commission, containing— 

17 (1) all findings and determinations made in car18 rying out the study required under subsection (a); 

19 and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3050 RFS

1 (2) any legislative recommendations of the 

2 Commission. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Public Health 101 – Public Health Laboratories Resources and Additional Reading 

Public Health 101 –

Public Health Laboratories Resources and Additional Reading

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Core functions and capabilities of state public health 

laboratories. MMWR Recommend Rep 2002;51(No. RR 14). 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5114.pdf.

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Multistate outbreak of listeriosis linked to whole 

cantaloupes from Jensen Farms, Colorado. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human 

Services, CDC; 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/cantaloupes-jensen-farms/index.html.

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recognizing the biosafety levels [Online training 

module]. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2012. 

http://www.cdc.gov/learning/quick_learns.html.

• Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL). About public health labs. Silver Spring, MD: APHL; 

[undated]. http://www.aphl.org/aboutaphl/aboutphls/pages/default.aspx.

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). West Nile virus. Atlanta, GA: US Department of 

Health and Human Services, CDC; 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/index.html.

1
No. 10-10405.

#### Roger A. Libby, Petitioner v. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

565 U.S. 835, 132 S. Ct. 140,

181 L. Ed. 2d 59,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5442.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: June 23, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Donald J. RadkoskiDonald J. RadkoskiChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent such certification is
explicitly incorporated by reference in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001065633
<NAME> NETWORK PLUS CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,584
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,996
<PP&E>                                          57,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,890
<BONDS>                                         21,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           38,302
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           533
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,521)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,459)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Warrino,
      Chief Financial Officer adn Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
      24,
      2006











/s/
      Joseph Warrino


Chief
      Financial Officer/Secretary