alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013108EN.01003201.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/32

---

Action brought on 12 February 2013 — FTI Touristik v OHIM (BigXtra)

(Case T-81/13)

2013/C 108/80

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by A. Parr, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 November 2012 in Case R 2521/12011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 November 2012 in Case R 2521/12011-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘BigXtra’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 925 868

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Oregon Provincial Interagency Executive Committee 
(PIEC), Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on July 
14, 1998 at the Diamond Lake Resort at Diamond Lake in Douglas County, 
Oregon.
    The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue until 5:00 p.m. 
Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Review of committee operating 
guides; (2) a proposal for course woody material management; (3) 
Province Interagency Executive Committee action on the Advisory 
Committee's recommendation on issues to work on over the next year; (4) 
local issue presentation by Umpqua National Forest and Roseburg Bureau 
of Land Management; (5) Subcommittee reports; and (7) public comment. 
All Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Chuck Anderson, Province 
Advisory Committee staff, USDA, Forest Service, Rogue River National 
Forest, 333 W. 8th Street, Medford, Oregon 97501, phone 541-858-2322.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Charles J. Anderson,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 98-17283 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 99.2

** **

**Certification of****Richard A. Mansfield**

**Vice President, Chief Financial Officer**

**of******

**Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.******

** **

I, Richard A. Mansfield, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., hereby certify, in accordance with 18    U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)        The Annual Report on Form    10-K for the year ended February 2, 2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)        The information contained    in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2003, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by    Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated:  April 25, 2003.

                                                                                  By: */s/ Richard A. Mansfield*                         

                                                                                              Richard A. Mansfield

                                                                                              Vice President,

                                                                                              Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-652.

#### John F. Peoples, Petitioner v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1180, 131 S. Ct. 1008,

178 L. Ed. 2d 829,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 836.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 179.
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION NOTICE AND AGREEMENT
BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
 
 
 
  Vesting Date:
    
    
    
    Number of Shares:BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.BY: STEWART K. OWENS, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERDATE: [INSERT DATE]




---



##### 



OPTION INFORMATION
 
 VESTING
 Vesting Date
    
    Number of Shares
  OPTION TERM
 EXERCISE




---



##### 



Cash
 Swap/Stock-for-Stock Exercise
 Broker Assisted Exercise
 TAX WITHHOLDING
 EXERCISE FOLLOWING RETIREMENT, DEATH, DISABILITY, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR A CHANGE IN CONTROL
OF THE COMPANY:
 Retirement (minimum age 55):
 Death:
 Disability




---



##### 



Termination of Employment
 Change in Control of the Company
 RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF OPTION
 TAX CONSEQUENCES




---



#####
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3002 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3002

 To provide for the carriage of certain television broadcast stations, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

   Mr. Neal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the carriage of certain television broadcast stations, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARRIAGE OF TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
cable operator may transmit to subscribers in Berkshire County, 
Massachusetts, in the designated market area of Albany, New York (in 
this section referred to as the ``Albany designated market area''), any 
television broadcast station that--
            (1) was retransmitted to subscribers located in Berkshire 
        County in the Albany designated market area on December 1, 
        2016; and
            (2) as of the date of enactment of this Act, is not 
        retransmitted to all subscribers in Berkshire County in the 
        Albany designated market area.
    (b) Negotiations.--A cable operator that engages in the 
retransmission described in subsection (a) shall engage in good faith 
negotiations within the meaning of section 76.65 of title 47, Code of 
Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto, with a television 
broadcast station regarding the terms of such retransmission.
    (c) Nonduplication.--Any television broadcast station licensed to a 
community within the Albany designated market area may assert network 
nonduplication or syndicated exclusivity protections against any cable 
system in any cable community located in Berkshire County, 
Massachusetts.
    (d) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed--
            (1) to alter any contract provided under section 325 of the 
        Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 325); or
            (2) to affect the applicability of any other communications 
        or copyright law related to the retransmission of a television 
        broadcast station by a cable operator.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 24464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10643]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday, May 13, 2011.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-10643 Filed 4-28-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
**Exhibit 21**Subsidiaries of the Registrant     The Registrant directly or indirectly owns 100 percent of the outstanding voting securities ofthe following subsidiary companies.   **Name of Company** **Jurisdiction**Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc. KansasCalibrated Forms Co., Inc. KansasConnolly Tool and Machine Company DelawareAdmore, Inc. TexasPFC Products, Inc.(1) DelawareEnnis Acquisitions, Inc. NevadaTexas EBF, LP TexasEnnis Sales, LP TexasEnnis Management, LP TexasAdams McClure, LP TexasAmerican Forms I, LP TexasNorthstar Computer Forms, Inc. MinnesotaGeneral Financial Supply, Inc. (2) IowaCrabar/GBF, Inc. DelawareRoyal Business Forms, Inc. TexasAlstyle Apparel, LLC TexasA and G, Inc. (3) IllinoisAlstyle Ensenada LLC (3) IllinoisAlstyle Hermosillo LLC (3) IllinoisDiaco USA LLC (3) IllinoisCactex S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoCactex de Mexico SA de C.V. (3) MexicoAlstyle International de Mexico SA de C.V. (3) MexicoAlvest, S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoDiaco International S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoTennessee Business Forms, Inc. TennesseeTBF Realty, LLC (4) DelawareSpecialized Printed Forms, Inc. New YorkBlock Graphics, Inc. OregonTrade Envelope, Inc. ArizonaB&D Litho, Inc. ArizonaSkyline Business Forms Colorado (1) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Admore, Inc. (2) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Computer Forms, Inc. (3) A wholly-owned direct or indirect subsidiary of Alstyle Apparel, LLC (4) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Tennessee Business Forms, Inc.
Exhibit 10.1

 

June 18, 2014

 

BY HAND
  Mr. Robert J. Zatta

 

Bob:

 

The purpose of this letter is to confirm our mutual understandings and agreement with respect to your employment agreement with Rockwood Specialties LLC (formerly, Rockwood Specialties, Inc., and hereinafter the “Company”), dated November 13, 2008, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”), as a result of your appointment as Acting Chief Executive Officer of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”).  Specifically,

 

·                  Notwithstanding your appointment as Acting Chief Executive Officer of Rockwood, you will continue to serve as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, which shall continue to govern your employment with the Company.

 

·                  For purposes of the Employment Agreement, at such time, if any, that Rockwood appoints a new Chief Executive Officer such that you are required to relinquish the title of Acting Chief Executive Officer, in no event shall either such appointment or the diminution of your duties and responsibilities in connection therewith constitute “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement.  Similarly, if you are asked to relinquish your title as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company in order to retain your role as Chief Executive Officer, such relinquishment shall in no event constitute “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement (although, for purposes thereof, your Good Reason rights shall thereafter be based on your duties and responsibilities as Chief Executive Officer).

 

To confirm your agreement with the above, please execute where indicated below and return the filly executed copy of this letter to me.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

	
/s/   Thomas J. Riordan
    	
 
    
	
Thomas   J. Riordan
    	
 
    
	
On   behalf of Rockwood Specialties Group Inc.,
    	
 
    
	
as   the sole member of Rockwood Specialties LLC
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED   AND ACCEPTED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Robert J. Zatta
    	
 
    
	
Robert   J. Zatta
    	
 
    
	
Date:   June 18, 2014
p130292.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0292 Focus Ready Draft 3/14/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ REC PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

SAT (concerns) (02/26/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Moderate to Rapid PBT rating: P1B1T1 . Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water Page 1p130292.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0292

Use:

Number of Sites/ Location: 1 WT Burnett & Co Jessup MD 20794 Days/yr: 250

Page 2p130292.eng

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 1.3E+2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site or 3.3E+4 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 8.7E+1 kg/site-day over 1 day/yr from 1 site or 8.7E+1 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL 3.3E+4 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 10

Inhalation: negligible (VP < 0.001 torr).

Dermal: Exposure to imported liquid PMN is assessed below.

Page 3p130292.eng Exposure to Liquid at 98.00% concentration High End: 1.7E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 10

Page 4
No. 10-6324.

#### Joseph R. Grooms, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 859,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 666.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 974, 131 S. Ct. 491, 178 L. Ed. 2d 311, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7924.
# Kluczynski, developer of leaders, to join DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published Sept. 16, 2016
#### Belikov et al., Respondents, v. Huhs et al., Petitioners,

No. 91979-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72334-1-1, July 7, 2015. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
Gulf of 

Mexico

PACIFIC OCEAN Rio Grande

Río Bravo

Rio Grande

ColoradoR vi er

Gulf of California

US Border Counties 

US Border States

US-Mexico Border 

BIDS Officer Location 

BIDS Sites in the US-Mexico Border Region

US Border Counties 

US Border States

Texas Public Health Region

US-Mexico Border 

BIDS Officer Location 

9/10

8

11

8

11

San 

Diego Imperial

Yuma

Pima

Phoenix

Santa 

Cruz

Cochise

Hidalgo

Grant

El 

Paso

Sierra 

Otero

Culberson Hudspeth

Pecos

Reeves

Maverick

KinneyUvalde

Edwards

Zavala Frio

La 

Salle

Dimmit

Webb Duval

Jim 

Hogg

Zapata

StarrHidalgo

Real

Brooks

McMullen

Sutton

Jeff Davis Crockett

Val Verde Terrell

Doña Ana

Luna

Presidio Brewster

TAMAULIPAS

BAJA 

CALIFORNIA

SONORA

CHIHUAHUA

COAHUILA

NUEVO 

LEÓN

Kenedy

Willacy

Cameron
No. 10-6967.

#### Denandias Watson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1050, 131 S. Ct. 614,

178 L. Ed. 2d 446,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8837.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
From: Bark, Richard A. [Richard_Bark@fmi.com]

Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:47 PM
To: McKaughan, Colleen Subject: RE: New Court

- Ordered Deadline for Arizona Regional Haze FIP

Colleen:

Thank you for the update. Freeport

- McMoRan will be submitting written comments to the EPA’s proposal next week (by March 6) and we will provide you with a direct copy. We will also contact you after that time regarding any additional information that may be of use to EPA. If you have any questions or ne ed anything in the meantime, please feel free contact me by email or on my mobile phone (602

- 376

- 7245).

Thank you.

Richard

From: McKaughan, Colleen [ mailto:McKaughan.Colleen@epa.gov ]
Sent: Wedne sday, February 27, 2013 5:44 PM
To: Bark, Richard A. Cc: Nudd, Gregory; GLASS, GEOFFREY; Chen, Eugene; Kelly, Shaheerah; Webb, Thomas; ecm@azdeq.gov Subject: New Court

- Ordered Deadline for Arizona Regional Haze FIP

De ar Richard,

I’m writing to let you know that the court

- ordered deadline for EPA to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) addressing regional haze in Arizona has been extended to September 6, 2013. Our deadline for final action on Arizona’s State Impl ementation Plan (SIP) remains July 15, 2013. The deadline for commenting on our December 20, 2012 proposed action on Arizona’s SIP is March 6, 2013.

If EPA finalizes disapproval of any aspect of the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, we are obligated to

propose an d later finalize a FIP to address these disapproved portions. The deadlines for these proposed and final actions are set in a consent decree. The parties to the consent decree recently agreed to extend these deadlines and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting a motion to amend the consent decree to reflect these new deadlines. The new deadlines of September 6, 2013 for the proposed action and February 6, 2014 for the final action provide the agency more time for the technical work that will form the
basis of the FIP.

If you are planning to provide technical information that you think would be helpful to EPA in preparing our FIP proposal, please provide that information no later than May 10, 2013 . This will allow us enough time to review and consider the information in preparing the proposal.

In the case of the equipment you identified as BART

- eligible (the electric furnace, the four Hoboken converters, and the remelt/mold pouring vessel) in Gila County, Arizona, we areparticularly interested in getting your feedback regarding the effectiveness of existing SO 2

controls and the estimated costs of installing more effective SO 2 controls and increasing the effectiveness of existing controls. We are al so interested in the costs of installing lower NO x emitting combustion equipment and the expected emission reductions associated with such an upgrade. You may also propose your own five factor BART analyses for SO 2 and NO x for the

BART

- eligible units.

If y ou have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Colleen McKaughan
Exhibit 10.39

Escalade,
Incorporated
Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation

Compensation for the executive officers of Escalade,
Incorporated consists of a base salary, bonuses and long-term incentives in the
form of stock option grants or restricted stock unit grants.

Base
SalaryIn general, base salaries are set at the beginning of each
year based upon the Companys income level generated in the prior year, any
changes in the level of responsibility and the subjective individual
performance review conducted by the Companys Compensation Committee.  The 2008 base salaries for the Companies
executive officers are as follows:

|                 |  |  |                                         |  |                    |         | 
|---------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- | 
|Name             |  |  | Position                                |  | Annual Base Salary
|                 |  |  |                                         | 
|Robert Griffin   |  |  | Chairman of the Board                   |  | $                  | 53,500  | 
|Robert J. Keller |  |  | President and Chief
  Executive Officer |  | $                  | 300,000 | 
|Terry Frandsen   |  |  | VP Finance, CFO                         |  | $                  | 187,000 | 

Bonuses
Each year the Companys Compensation Committee establishes targeted bonuses for
its key executives based on target performance levels for the Company.
Performance targets are based on achieving pre-tax income goals in relation to
invested capital which is defined as beginning shareholder equity plus average
bank debt outstanding. Based on actual results achieved, a bonus pool is
accrued for use in paying bonuses. There are no pre-defined methods for
allocating the bonus pool to any of the key executives; allocation and payment
is entirely at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and Board of
Directors.

Long-Term
Incentives
Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, executive
officers of the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive
compensation in various forms including stock options and restricted stock
units. The Companys Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form,
amount and timing of these grants which historically have been annual grants.
In its determination of annul grants, the Compensation Committee considers
performance of both the individual and the Company.

Additional
BenefitsExecutive officers are eligible to participate in the
Companys 401(k) retirement plan and receive Company matching contributions in
accordance with the plan terms. The Company also pays group term life insurance
benefits on behalf of executive officers. The Companys Chairman of the Board
participates in a salary deferral plan that earns interest on undistributed
amounts at the rate of 9% per annum.

---
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1230 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 141 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**