alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

			
	COMMON STOCK	 	COMMON STOCK

 LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 
  

			
		 	 CUSIP

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                        
 
 Is the record holder of
                                        
     
 FULLY PAID AND NON-assessable shares of common stock, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 

LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 

Transferable on the books of the Corporation by the person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

Dated: 
  

					
		    		 	 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
  

	  
 President
	    		 	
		    	[SEAL]	 	TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR.
		    		 	 By:
  

	  
 Secretary
	    		 	  
 AUTHORIZED
SIGNATURE









 LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

															
	TEN COM	 	—	  	as tenants in common	  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —	  	  
	  	Custodian	  	  

	TEN ENT	 	—	  	as tenants by the entireties	  		  		  	(Cust)	  		  	(Minor)
	JT TEN	 	—	  	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	  		  		  	 under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

 
  

(State)

						
		 		  		  	UNIF TRF MIN ACT —	  		  	Custodian (until age
		 		  		  		  		  	                                	  	        )        	  	                                
		 		  		  		  		  	(Cust)	  		  	(Minor)
		 		  		  		  		  	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
						
		 		  		  		  		  	  

(State)


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

  
 2 








 For Value Received,
                                         
                                         
                                         
              hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL

 SECURITY OR OTHER 
 IDENTIFYING 

NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
  

 
  

 
  

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

 
  
  

 
 Of the
        Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
  

 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of
the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Date
                     
  

			
		 	  

Signature

		
	NOTICE:	 	  
 THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.



  

	
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:
	
	  
 SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY
AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.

	


  
 3
# C_2016098EN.01000902.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court — Germany)) — Vodafone GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-395/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/21/EC - Article 7(3) - Procedure for consolidating the internal market for electronic communications - Directive 2002/19/EC - Articles 8 and 13 - Operator designated as having significant market power on a market - Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities - Price control and cost accounting obligations - Authorisation of mobile call termination fees))

(2016/C 098/11)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodafone GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) must be interpreted as meaning that, when an national regulatory authority has required an operator which has been designated as having significant market power to provide mobile call termination services and has made the fees charged for this subject to authorisation following the procedure laid down in that provision, that national regulatory authority is required to carry out the procedure again before each authorisation of those fees to that operator, where that authorisation is likely to affect trade between the Member States within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.

1

---
*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP7.18. APPENDIX 7.18**

**SECURITY COOPERATION CUSTOMER CODES 

1

AP7.18-1

APPENDIX 7.18
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 96-40445

______________________________
JAMES RILEY CORNETT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

W.K. LONGOIS; Orange city Police Department; K.C. BREASHERS; DONALD MACDONALD; MARVIN HELMS,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

( 1:93-CV-361 )

_________________________________________________________________ January 7, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :

Texas prisoner James Riley Cornett, Jr., No. 03495-078, seeks

to appeal (styled “Interlocutory”) a partial final judgment entered

i n December 1994 (the parties consent to trial before the

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)), and the denial of

a “Motion to Invoke Pendent Jurisdiction”, a motion for service ofprocess, and two discovery motions. Cornett’s remaining claims

have yet to be tried.

The December 1994 order has been previously appealed to this

court and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The underlying facts

have not changed, and the second appeal is frivolous. The appeal

from the denial o f motions is premature, as that denial does not

constitute a fi nal judgment and Cornett has not satisfied an

exception to this requirement. Accordingly, jurisdiction to review

these denials is lacking. S ee e.g., Dardar v. Lafourche Realty

Co. , 849 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we need not

reach the applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

We warn Cornett that any additional frivolous appeals filed by

him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, he is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# mniteb**~tates** 

# <!Court of**~eals** 

# for !bejf 

# eberaI <!Circuit

ROLLAND MARSHALL, Claimant-Appellant, 

### v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. 2012-7071 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 09-4778, Judge Robert N. Davis. ON MOTION

ORDER Rolland Marshall moves for a 90-day extension of time to obtain counsel. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:MARSHALL v. DVA 2 The motion is granted to the extent that Marshall's opening briefis due within 90 days of the date offiling of this order. No further extensions should be anticipated. 

### MAR 09 2012 Date

cc: Rolland Marshall Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.s. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERALCIRCUIT



### MAR U 92012 JANHDRBAty 

### • ClERK
****

**DoD Supply Discrepancy Reporting (SDR) Process Review Committee (PRC) Meeting 15-1**

**April 28, 2015**

Agenda

*Updated:  9/12/2017 6:46 AM*                                                                                                                        1
No. D-2486.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Garrett L. Lee.

562 U.S. 1197, 131 S. Ct. 1066,

178 L. Ed. 2d 880,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 982.

January 24, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 42, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1132, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5619.
#### *Belenski, Petitioner, v. Jefferson County, Respondent,*

No. 92161-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45756-3-II, May 19, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 724. *Granted*January 7, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35931-35932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17454]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

[[Page 35932]]

holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 17, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Patricia McLaurin Morgan, Richard Brand Morgan, Paul Mangum 
Morgan, all of Lawrenceville, Georgia; to acquire voting shares of 
Brand Banking Company, Lawrenceville, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 25, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17454 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2813 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2813

 To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for employment in the 
                 United States and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2019

Ms. Pingree (for herself, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Omar, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. 
Ocasio-Cortez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for employment in the 
                 United States and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Asylum Seeker Work Authorization Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR ALIENS SEEKING ASYLUM.

    Paragraph (2) of section 208(d) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Employment authorization.--
                    ``(A) Eligibility.--The Secretary of Homeland 
                Security shall authorize employment for an applicant 
                for asylum who is not in detention and whose 
                application for asylum has not been determined 
                frivolous.
                    ``(B) Application.--An applicant for asylum who is 
                not otherwise eligible for employment authorization 
                shall not be granted such authorization prior to 30 
                days after the date of filing of the application for 
                asylum.
                    ``(C) Term.--Employment authorization for an 
                applicant for asylum--
                            ``(i) shall be for a period of 1 year; and
                            ``(ii) shall be renewable for additional 1-
                        year periods for the entire continuous period 
                        necessary to adjudicate the applicant's asylum 
                        claim, including administrative or judicial 
                        review.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-1351.

#### Alan Keyes, et al., Petitioners v. Debra Bowen, Secretary of State of California, et al.

565 U.S. 817, 132 S. Ct. 99,

181 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6851.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 189 Cal. App. 4th 647, 117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 207.
Exhibit
32.2













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Matthew M. Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














By: /s/
      Matthew M. MartinMatthew
      M. MartinChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      16, 2009
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.16 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation Employee Spotlight Oklahoma City People and culture
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.16 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation Employee Spotlight Oklahoma City People and culture
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.16 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation Employee Spotlight Oklahoma City People and culture
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.16 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation Employee Spotlight Oklahoma City People and culture
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.32


                               FIRST AMENDMENT OF
               DATEK ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP. 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, Ameritrade Holding Corporation maintains the Datek Online Holdings
Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of September 25,
2004, in the following particulars:

     1. By changing the name of the Plan from "DATEK ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP. 1998
STOCK OPTION PLAN" to "AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN".

     2. By substituting the following for Section 1 of the Plan:

"1. PURPOSE AND GENERAL INFORMATION.

         Pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger (the `Merger Agreement'),
         Datek Online Holdings Corp. (`Datek') became a subsidiary of a newly
         formed corporation, Ameritrade Holding Corporation (`Ameritrade' or the
         `Company') effective as of September 9, 2002 (the `Restatement Date')
         and as of the Restatement Date, Ameritrade assumed the Plan and all
         outstanding obligations hereunder. The Plan was amended and restated
         effective as of September 9, 2002. Effective as of September 25, 2004,
         the name of the Plan was changed to the Ameritrade Holding Corporation
         1998 Stock Option Plan (the `Plan').

         A.       The purposes of the Plan are:

         o        to induce certain employees, directors and consultants to
                  remain in the employ or service of Ameritrade and its present
                  and future subsidiary corporations (each a `Subsidiary'). The
                  terms in quotes are defined in Section 424(f) of the Internal
                  Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the `Code').

         o        to attract new individuals to accept employment or service
                  with Ameritrade and Subsidiaries and to encourage them to own
                  Ameritrade stock.

         B.       The Company believes that the granting of stock options (the
                  `Options') under the Plan will benefit the Company in several
                  ways. Options will help to retain management. Options create
                  incentives for good performance on the job. Employees with
                  Options should be more interested in the Company's doing well,
                  which in turn should increase the value of their Options.




<PAGE>

         C.       Two kinds of Options can be granted under the Plan. One kind
                  is called an `incentive stock option' (another term that is
                  defined in the Code, specifically Section 422(b) of the Code).
                  The other kind is called a `non-qualified stock option.' Which
                  kind of Option is being granted is decided by the Committee
                  (the `Committee') referred to in Section 4 below at the time
                  the Option is granted. The Committee can grant one, the other,
                  or both kinds of Options to any person eligible to have
                  Options under the Plan."
No. 10-7560.

#### Melvin Brecht, Petitioner v. Lynn Marten, et al.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1013,

178 L. Ed. 2d 841,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 773.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-7487.

#### Charity Bailey, Petitioner v. Indiana.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1009,

178 L. Ed. 2d 838,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 789.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 923 N.E.2d 434.
No. 10-6259.

#### Osvaldo Ceballos-Zuniga, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 903,

178 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 273.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 417.
IF YOU SMOKE WITH

DIABETES, PLAN

FOR AMPUTATION,

KIDNEY FAILURE,

HEART SURGERY ...

OR ALL THREE.

Bill, Age 40

Michigan 

Smoking makes diabetes much worse. You can quit.

For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
**DoD 4000.25-6-M**

**11 MARCH 1997**

DLM 4000.25, Volume 6, June 5, 2012

**APPENDIX 2.8**

## 

**DELETION****TO MAPAD FOR FMS**

**(MA3)**

## 

2

AP2.2-2

AP2.8-1

APPENDIX 2.8
Exhibit
32.1
 Form
10-QSB
 Viking
Systems, Inc.
 File No.
000-49636
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Marsh,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  May 10,
2005
 
 
 
 /s/
Thomas B. Marsh
 Chief
Executive Officer, President
No. 10-1432.

#### Sylvester Okoro, Petitioner v. City of Oakland Police Officer Enoch Olivas, et al.

565 U.S. 821, 132 S. Ct. 106,

181 L. Ed. 2d 33,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6655.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
No. 10-10356.

#### Armster Hampton, Petitioner v. Michael S. Evans, Warden.

565 U.S. 834, 132 S. Ct. 137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 57,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5702.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 993.
<html>
	<head>
		<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" /><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/secondhand-smoke/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Ftobacco%2Fbasic_information%2Fsecondhand_smoke%2Findex.htm" />	</head>
	<body></body>
	</html>