alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SNOW ENGINEERING CO.

W ICHITA F ALLS , T EXAS 

## ENGINEERING NUMBER



### REPORT X 2 308

ORDER MODEL

TITLE BY CHK’D 

### See Below

GLIDE PERFORMANCE

–

AT

- 80 2 /802A Claire Meschkat JH SERIAL

DATE 

### ALL

1/ 2 4 /1 3 PAGE 

### 1 OF 

### 2

REFERENCES :

[1] Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance, C.E. Lan & Jan Roskam

[2] Snow Engineering Co. Report 1747

– “ AT

- 802/802A Rate of Climb Performance Calculations ”

PURPOSE :

The purpose of this report is to document and compare the glide performance of the AT

- 8 02 with

spray equipment installed, the AT

- 802 i n firefighting configuration, the AT

- 802A with spray equipment

installed and the AT

- 802A in firefighting configuration

.

SUMMARY :

The aircraft to be compared in this report are based on the geometric parameters listed in Table 1

.

Table 1 : Configuration Geometry

AT

- 8 02/802A

Wingspan [ft] 5 9 .25

Wing Area [ft 2 ] 4 01

Aspect Ratio 8

. 7 5

The smallest glide angle is obtained when flying at t he maximum possible lift

- to

- drag ratio. Based on

the geometry in T able 1 and drag polars from Reference [2], the rate s of descent corresponding to

the best L/D ratio on a standard day were derived . The weight of each aircraft was calculated with

3 80 gallons of fuel and an empty hopper. Table 2 below shows the L/D ratios and rates of descent of

each configuration at 95 mph

.

Table 2 : Glide Performance

Configuration AT

- 8 02 w/

Spray Equip. AT

- 8 02 w/

F ire. Equip. AT

- 8 02 A w/

Spray Equip. AT

- 8 02 A w/

F ire Equip.

L/D 10. 4 11. 8 9. 8 1 1.0

Rate of Descent [ft/min] 8 0 2 7 0 8 8 5 6 7 5 9

The following graph depicts the descent in altitude per distance traveled of each aircraft c onfiguration

. The maximum range or minimum glide angle under zero wind conditions is achieved by flyin g at 95

MPH.

### SNOW ENGINEERING CO.

W ICHITA F ALLS , T EXAS 

## ENGINEERING NUMBER



### REPORT X 2 308

ORDER MODEL

TITLE BY CHK’D 

### See Below

GLIDE PERFORMANCE

–

AT

- 80 2 /802A Claire Meschkat JH SERIAL

DATE 

### ALL

1/ 2 4 /1 3 PAGE 

### 2 OF 

### 2

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Altitude [ feet MSL]

Ground Distance [Statute Miles] 

# Maximum Glide

AT

- 802 W/ Spray Equip. AT

- 802 W/ Fire. Equip.

AT

- 802A W/ Spray Equip. AT

- 802A W/ Fire. Equip. 

### *Speed = 95 MPH (IAS)

= 83 KIAS

*Propeller F eathered

*Zero Wind

*Flaps Up
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 OFFICERS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended And Restated October 30, 2008,
Effective as of January 1, 2005)
       Account
 Beneficiary
 Compensation
 Disability




---



##### 



Election Form
 Employer
 Officer
 Participant
 Plan Administrator
 Plan Year
 Section 409A
 Unforeseeable Emergency
   Eligibility to Participate
 Deferral Election
 Time and Manner of Election
 2




---



##### 



Accounting for Participants Interests
 Deferrals
 Account Interest
 Vesting of a Participants Account
 3




---



##### 



Distribution of a Participants Account
 Date Specified in Participants Election
 Termination of Employment
  4




---



##### 



Death of Participant
 Change in Control
 Early Distributions
   Action
 5




---



##### 



Right and Duties
 i.
    
    To construe, interpret, and administer the Plan;ii.
    
    To make allocations and determinations required by
the Plan, and to maintain records regarding Participants Accounts;iii.
    
    To compute and certify to the Employer the amount
and kinds of benefits payable to Participants or their Beneficiary(ies),
and to determine the time and manner in which such benefits are to be
paid;iv.
    
    To authorize all disbursements by the Employer
pursuant to the Plan;v.
    
    To maintain (or cause to be maintained) all the
necessary records of the administration of the Plan;vi.
    
    To make and publish such rules for the regulation
of the Plan as are not inconsistent with the terms hereof;vii.
    
    To delegate to other individuals or entities from
time to time the performance of any duties or responsibilities hereunder;
andviii.
    
    To hire agents, accountants, actuaries,
consultants and legal counsel to assist in operating and administering
the Plan.
  Compensation, Indemnity and Liability
 Taxes
 6




---



##### 



Claims for Benefits
 Appeals
   Amendments
 Termination of Plan
 7




---



##### 



Limitation on Participants Rights
 Benefits Unfunded
  Other Plans
 8




---



##### 



Receipt or Release
 Governing Law
 Employers
 Gender, Tense, and Headings
 Nonalienation of Benefits
 Conformance with Section 409A
 9
#### *State, Respondent, v. Conner, Petitioner,*

No. 92031-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 43762-7-II and 45418-1-II, June 4, 2015, 4,2015,188 188 Wn. App. 1003. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
Accessed on January 18, 2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

ENR's Construction Cost Index History (1908-2009)

1913=100

1990 4680 4685 4691 4693 4707 4732 4734 4752 4774 4771 4787 4777 4732

1991 4777 4773 4772 4766 4801 4818 4854 4892 4891 4892 4896 4889 48351992 4888 4884 4927 4946 4965 4973 4992 5032 5042 5052 5058 5059 49851993 5071 5070 5106 5167 5262 5260 5252 5230 5255 5264 5278 5310 52101994 5336 5371 5381 5405 5405 5408 5409 5424 5437 5437 5439 5439 54081995 5443 5444 5435 5432 5433 5432 5484 5506 5491 5511 5519 5524 54711996 5523 5532 5537 5550 5572 5597 5617 5652 5683 5719 5740 5744 56201997 5765 5769 5759 5799 5837 5860 5863 5854 5851 5848 5838 5858 58261998 5852 5874 5875 5883 5881 5895 5921 5929 5963 5986 5995 5991 59201999 6000 5992 5986 6008 6006 6039 6076 6091 6128 6134 6127 6127 60592000 6130 6160 6202 6201 6233 6238 6225 6233 6224 6259 6266 6283 62212001 6281 6272 6279 6286 6288 6318 6404 6389 6391 6397 6410 6390 63432002 6462 6462 6502 6480 6512 6532 6605 6592 6589 6579 6578 6563 65382003 6581 6640 6627 6635 6642 6694 6695 6733 6741 6771 6794 6782 66942004 6825 6862 6957 7017 7065 7109 7126 7188 7298 7314 7312 7308 71152005 7297 7298 7309 7355 7398 7415 7422 7479 7540 7563 7630 7647 74462006 7660 7689 7692 7695 7691 7700 7721 7722 7763 7883 7911 7888 77512007 7880 7880 7856 7865 7942 7939 7959 8007 8050 8045 8092 8089 79662008 8090 8094 8109 8112 8141 8185 8293 8362 8557 8623 8602 8551 83102009 8549 8533 8534 8528 8574 8578 8566 8564 8586 8596 8592 8641 85702010 8660 8672 8671 8677 8761 8805 8844 8837 8836 8921 8951 8952 87992011 8938 8998 9011 9027 9035 9053 9080 9088 9116 9147 9173 9172 90702012 9176 9198 9268 9273 9290 9291 9324 9360 9341 9376 9398 9412 93092013 9437 9453 9456 9484 9516 9542 9552 9551 9552 9689 9666 9668 9547

ANNUAL AVERAGE

1908 97 1931 181 1954 628 1977 25761909 91 1932 157 1955 660 1978 27761910 96 1933 170 1956 692 1979 30031911 93 1934 198 1957 724 1980 32371912 91 1935 196 1958 759 1981 35351913 100 1936 206 1959 797 1982 38251914 89 1937 235 1960 824 1983 40661915 93 1938 236 1961 847 1984 41461916 130 1939 236 1962 872 1985 41951917 181 1940 242 1963 901 1986 42951918 189 1941 258 1964 936 1987 44061919 198 1942 276 1965 971 1988 45191920 251 1943 290 1966 1019 1989 46151921 202 1944 299 1967 10741922 174 1945 308 1968 11551923 214 1946 346 1969 12691924 215 1947 413 1970 13811925 207 1948 461 1971 15811926 208 1949 477 1972 17531927 206 1950 510 1973 18951928 207 1951 543 1974 20201929 207 1952 569 1975 22121930 203 1953 600 1976 2401

Construction Cost Index History

Text size: A AHOW ENR BUILDS THE INDEX: 200 hours of common labor at the 20-city average of common labor rates, plus 25 cwt of standard structural steel shapes at the mill price prior to 1996 and the 

fabricated 20-city price from 1996, plus 1.128 tons of portland cement at the 20-city price, plus 1,088 board ft of 2 x 4 lumber at the 20-city price.

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ANNUAL AVERAGE
##### 



AMERIGROUP CORPORATION
CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFIT POLICY
 Section 1. Purpose of Policy.
  Section 2. Definitions.
   Affiliate 
 (b)  Award 
 Board 
 Cause




---



##### 



(e)  Change in Control
     (f)  Code 
 2




---



##### 



(g)  Committee 
 (h)  Company 
 (i)  Date of Termination 
 (j)  Disability 
 (k)  Eligible Recipient 
 (l)  Enhancement Amount 
 (m)  Equity Plan 
 (n)  Excise Tax 
 (o)  Good Reason 
 (p)  LTI Award 
 3




---



##### 



(q)  LTI Plan 
 (r)  Multiple 
 (s)  Notice of Termination 
 (t)  Participant 
 (u)  Payment 
 (v)  Protected Period 
 (w)  Separation from Service 
 (x)  Subsidiary 
 (y)  Target Amount 
 4




---



##### 



Section 3. Effective Date.
  Section 4. Administration.
   Section 5. Benefits Provided.
 Payments Upon a Change in Control 
 Termination After Change in Control 
 5




---



##### 



General Release 
 Section 280G 
   6




---



##### 



Other Existing Arrangements
 7




---



##### 



Section 6. Termination Procedures.
  Section 7. No Mitigation.
  Section 8. Successors.
    8




---



##### 



Section 9. Notices.
   
 Section 10. Miscellaneous
     9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11
No. 10-10233.

#### Walter Leonardo, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 802, 132 S. Ct. 76,

181 L. Ed. 2d 2,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6876.

October 3, 2011.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 131 S. Ct. 2382, 180 L. Ed. 2d 357 (2011).

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 866.
Exhibit 12(a)


                   Elizabethtown Water Company & Subsidiary
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                        1995        1994        1993        1992        1991

                      ________    ________    ________    ________    ________
EARNINGS:
Income before
 preferred stock
 dividends          $17,325,144 $14,223,142 $14,832,519 $12,149,343 $11,361,063
Federal income taxes  9,161,510   7,413,995   7,916,794   6,021,464   5,630,265
Interest charges     11,114,496  10,402,060  11,437,710  10,623,801  11,016,414

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
Earnings available
 to cover fixed
 charges            $37,601,150 $32,039,197 $34,187,023 $28,794,608 $28,007,742

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long
 term debt           10,892,129  10,774,008  11,527,301  10,516,521  10,585,336
Other interest        2,343,903     175,507      77,921     514,122     535,834
Amortization of debt
 discount - net         323,557     319,646     224,383     209,631     287,180

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

Total fixed charges $13,559,589 $11,269,161 $11,829,605 $11,240,274 $11,408,350

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges             2.77        2.84        2.89        2.56        2.46

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

                    ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________


Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Income Before Preferred Stock
Dividends, Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Capitalized interest), divided by Fixed Charges.  Fixed Charges consist of
interest on long and short-term debt (which is not reduced by Capitalized
interest), and Amortization of debt discount.
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
William C. Bopp, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking Systems,
Inc.






Date:
      August 18, 2008
            /s/ William C.
      BoppWilliam
      C. BoppChief
      Executive Officer
No. 10-7235.

#### Jose Erbo, aka Miguel A. Garcia-Velez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 679,

178 L. Ed. 2d 504,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9398,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72900-72901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30385]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at 
the Legislative Building, Hearing Group Room 3C, 210 Capitol Avenue, 
Hartford, CT 06106, and will convene at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, December 
6, 2011. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to discuss police 
practices and the changing demographics in Connecticut. The purpose of 
the planning meeting is to plan future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, January 6, 
2012. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the

[[Page 72901]]

Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and 
after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, November 21, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-30385 Filed 11-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00211

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 78th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC78

- CR2022

- 0419

- 1 CTS 1

- 3 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E X PARTE 

### J ON 

### K LEIN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Jon Klein was indict ed for t hree counts of aggravated se xual assault. He filed a pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking a bond reduction for those charges
. The trial court denied the application, and Klein brought this appeal. The State has filed an u noppos ed motio n to dismiss this appeal as moot. According to the motion, the aggravated sex ual assault charges against Klein were dismissed in December 2022, and K lein is no longer confi ned on those charges. “The l ongstanding rule in Texas r egarding habeas corp us is tha t ‘where the premis e of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are moot. ’ ” Ex parte Cook , No. 02

- 19

- 00286

- CR, 2019 WL 6335 417, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Nov. 27 , 2019, no pet.) (mem. op. , n ot designated for publication ) (quoting Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d 852, 85 3 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 4th Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (per curi am) (mem. op.) ). Accordingly, we grant the State ’ s unopposed motion and dismiss Klein ’ s appeal as moot . See Tex. R. App. P . 42.2(a), 43
. 2(f). Per Curiam Do Not Publish Tex. R. App
. P. 47.2(b) Delivered : Fe bruary 9, 2023
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDER

FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDERChief Financial Officer
No. 10-7084.

#### Victor Sanjurjo-Nunez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 670,

178 L. Ed. 2d 499,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9167.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 18.
No. 10-11106.

#### Rae Lamar Wiggins, Petitioner v. Butch Jackson, Administrator, Nash Correctional Institution.

565 U.S. 867, 132 S. Ct. 214,

181 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6706.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 116.
# FEDERAL SUB TIER TABLE

# DOD SUB TIER TABLE
No. 10-10765.

#### Daniel Oriakhi, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 848, 132 S. Ct. 169,

181 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6225.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 976.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2969 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2969

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, as the ``Althea 
              Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTHEA MARGARET DAILY MILLS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Althea Margaret Daily Mills Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Althea 
Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
November 19, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LABYRON JAFFAR WARREN, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00919-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 10-10805.

#### Anastacio Ascencio-Toribio, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 850, 132 S. Ct. 174,

181 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6275.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 875.