alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3003 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3003

To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the maximum limit on 
  the number of special masters allowed in the United States Court of 
                Federal Claims, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the maximum limit on 
  the number of special masters allowed in the United States Court of 
                Federal Claims, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Vaccine Injury Compensation 
Program Improvement Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LIMIT ON NUMBER OF SPECIAL MASTERS ALLOWED 
              IN UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS.

    Section 2112(c)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-12(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``not more than 8 special 
masters'' and inserting ``not more than 16 special masters''.
                                 <all>
```
ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY       Exhibit 12(a)
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                         (In Thousands Except Ratios)



                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                 1998       1997        1996
EARNINGS:

Net Income                                    $ 24,768   $  20,905   $ 16,755
Federal income taxes                            13,101      11,274      8,822
Interest charges                                15,616      16,622     12,804
                                              --------------------------------
 Earnings available to cover fixed charges      53,485      48,801     38,381
                                              --------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt                      14,721      14,030     13,011
Other interest                                     960       2,382      2,640
Amortization of debt discount - net                391         376        361
                                              --------------------------------
Total fixed charges                             16,072      16,788     16,012
                                              --------------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                3.33        2.91       2.40
                                              ================================





Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Net Income,
Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), divided by Fixed Charges.
Fixed Charges consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), and
Amortization of debt discount.
EXHIBIT32

TBS INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDCERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, each of the undersigned officers of TBS International Limited andits subsidiaries, (the "Company"), doeshereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date:August 12, 2005  |  | /s/ Joseph E.Royce                                                JosephE. RoycePresident and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Ferdinand V.Lepere                                        FerdinandV. LepereSenior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer                                 |
| Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/AnthonyGentile                                               AnthonyGentileController, Chief AccountingOfficer          |
|                       |

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
#### State, Respondent, v. Sagun, Petitioner,

No. 91650-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46005-0-II, April 22, 2015. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of El Paso Natural Gas Company on Form S-3 and the four registration statements
of El Paso Natural Gas Company on Form S-8 (File No. 1-2700) of our report dated
March 15, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the
financial statement schedule of El Paso Natural Gas Company as of December 31,
1995 and 1994, and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
El Paso, Texas
March 15, 1996
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                        INFORMATION CONCERNING CONSENT OF
                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

         The company has been unable to obtain, after reasonable efforts, Arthur
Andersen's written consent to the company's incorporation by reference into its
registration statements of Arthur Andersen's audit report with respect to the
company's financial statements as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and for the years
then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act of
1933 permits the company to file this Form 10-K without a written consent from
Arthur Andersen. As a result, however, Arthur Andersen will not have any
liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of
a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen
or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly,
you would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section
11(a) of the Securities Act for any purchases of securities under the company's
registration statements made on or after the date of this Form 10-K. To the
extent provided in Section 11(b)(3)(C) of the Securities Act, however, other
persons who are liable under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including the
company's officers and directors, may still rely on Arthur Andersen's original
audit reports as being made by an expert for purposes of establishing a due
diligence defense under Section 11(b) of the Securities Act.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AGDALENA A. APOSTOLOVA a nd EM IL M ILYAKOV, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. JPM OR GAN C HASE B A NK; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-15644 D.C . No. 3:11-c v-02066-WHA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia W illia m Alsup, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Nove m

be r 7, 2013 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : FAR

R IS, B LAC K *** , a

nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s . 

# FIL ED NOV 14 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honora

ble Susa n H. B la c k, Se n ior C irc uit Judgefor the U.S. C ourt of Appe a ls for the Ele ve nth C i rc uit, sitting by de s igna tion.Em il M ily ak ov a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r (1) dism i ssing M ily akov’ s c la im

for sla nde r of title , injunc tive re l ie f, an d viola tion of C a lifornia C ivil C ode se c tion 2923.5 a nd C a lifornia

B usine s s a

nd Profe ssiona l C ode se c tion 17200, a nd (2) gra nting sum m ary judgm e nt in fa

v o r of JP M orga

n on M ily akov’ s c la im of unjust e nric hm e nt. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. The distric t c ourt e rre d by ta king judic ia l notic e of se v e n doc um e nts subm itte d by

JP M orga

n. The se doc um e nts we re not m atte rs of ge ne ra l knowle dge . Se eRe ina-Rodrigue z v . Unite d State

s , 655 F.3d 1182, 1193 (9th C ir. 2011). M ore ove r, the c onte nts of thedoc um e nts we re dispute d by M ily akov, a

nd thus did not m

e e t the R ule 201(b) sta

nda rd a llowing c ourts to “

judic ia lly notic e a fa c t tha t is not subje c t to re a sona ble dispute .” Fe d. R . Evid. 201(b) Any e rror, howe ve r, wa s ha

rm le ss. The distric t c ourt c o uld prope rly c onside r the six doc um e nts re fe re nc e d in or a tta c he d to M ily akov’ s c om pla ints, be c a use the c o m

pla i nts re l ie d on thedoc um e nts a nd the doc um e nts’ a

uthe ntic ity wa s not in que stion. Se eSw artz v . K PMG LLP , 476 F.3d 756, 763 (9th C ir. 2007). Furthe r, the distric t c o urt c ould c onside r the purc ha se an d a ssum p tion a g re e m e nt unde r R ule 12(d) of the Fe de ra l R ule s of C ivil Proc e dure , be c a use M ily akov ha d “ a re a s ona ble opportunity” to opposethe c ourt’ s c onside ration of this doc um e nt prior to the M arc h 15, 2012 Order granting sum m ary judgm e nt in fa

vor of JP M orga

n. 2AFFIRM ED.

3
# C_2015155EN.01002601.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)

(Case T-596/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Nael - Earlier Community word mark Mc Neal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 155/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Emsibeth SpA (Verona, Italy) (represented by: A. Arpaia, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Dusseldorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 1663/2012-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg KG and Emsibeth SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Emsibeth SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Emsibeth SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---
No. 09-466.

#### United States, Petitioner v. Leon Williams.

562 U.S. 1056, 131 S. Ct. 632,

178 L. Ed. 2d 471,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9396.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. On petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Abbott v. United States, 562 U.S. 8, 131 S. Ct. 18, 178 L. Ed. 2d 348 (2010).

Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 558 F.3d 166.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 19, 2020

NO. 03-20-00152-CV

C. C. F., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the decree of termination signed by the trial court on February 4, 2020.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

judgment. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.1. APPENDIX 8.1**

**FORMATS INTRODUCTION**

AP8.1.1.  General.  The AP8 series of appendices prescribe the record position alignment and data entries for the DoD Issue Release/Receipt Document and such other transactions that are utilized in the complete processing of a requisition through the supply system, including materiel obligation validation (MOV) formats, regardless of the organizational structure of the system

AP8.1.2.  Formats.  Legacy MILSTRIP formats are described in AP8.2 through AP8.55.

AP8.1.3.  Special Explanation/Instruction.

	AP8.1.3.1  Expressing Ammunition and Ammunition Related Quantities Exceeding 99,999.  For ammunition and ammunition related items Federal supply group (FSG) 13 and Federal supply Classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 1427, 1440, 5330, 5865, 6810, or 8140), quantities exceeding 99,999 may be expressed in thousands by placing an M in record position 29.  Example:  A quantity of 1,950,000 would be expressed as 1950M (1950 in record positions 25-28 and an M in record position 29.  Quantities not evenly divisible by thousands shall require two transactions.  The first transaction shall reflect the rounded thousands using the M modifier and the second transaction shall reflect the residual quantity. For example,  for a quantity of 100,001, the first document shall reflect a quantity of 0100M and the second document shall reflect a quantity of 00001.

	AP8.1.3.2.  Exception Rule for Ammunition and Ammunition Related Items.  Exception rules exist for ammunition and ammunition related items (FSG 13 and FSC 1410, 1420, 1427, 1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 8140). By trading partner agreement and by coordination with DLA Transaction Services, an exception rule is available for communicating larger quantities in identified transactions.  This rule is only applicable when the initiating system is DLMS compliant (and supports larger quantities) and the receiving system is using legacy MILSTRIP.  Under this rule, when the quantity exceeds 99,999, the DLA Transaction Services transaction conversion from DLMS to legacy format shall transmit the initial quantity using the standard configuration using the qualifier M in rp 29 to represent thousands.  The residual quantity from the DLMS transaction shall be transmitted separately using the original document number and original/blank suffix code.  The legacy trading partner system shall be responsible for accumulating the quantities transmitted separately (rather than superseding or rejecting as duplicate transactions).[footnoteRef:1] [1:  Refer to ADC 441 and ADC 441A, Exception Rules to Accommodate Communication of Ammunition/ Ammunition Related Quantities in Excess of Five Digits] 

1

APPENDIX 3.1

AP8.1-1

APPENDIX 3.1
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37361-37362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary; Membership of the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, the Joint staff, the U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization, the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency, the Defense 
Commissary Agency, the Defense Security Service, the Defense Security 
Assistance Agency, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, the 
Defense Field Activities and the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Armed 
Forces. The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 
4314(c)(4).
    The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior Executive 
Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding 
performance ratings and performance awards to the Secretary of Defense.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Koehle, Assistant Director 
for Staffing, Classification and Executive Resources, Directorate for 
Personnel and Security, Washington Headquarters Services, Office of the 
Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, The Pentagon, (703) 588-
0414.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following executives are appointed to the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense PRB: specific PRB panel assignments will be made from this 
group. Executives listed will serve a one-year renewable term, 
effective July 1, 1998.

Office of the Secretary of Defense

Chairman

Robert R. Soule

Members

Julie Aviles
Cindy Bogner
James F. O'Bryon
Frederic Celec
Donald Dix
Jim Dominy
Robert Drake
Michele Flourney
Joseph Friedl

[[Page 37362]]

John Gehrig
Stanley Gontarek
Doug Hansen
Charles Infosino
James L. Johnson
Jeanne Karstens
Thomas L. Link
Dr. John F. Mazzuchi
Gail H. McGinn
Michael A. Parmentier
Vincent P. Roske
John Roth
Caral Spangler
Norma St. Claire
Robert Taylor
Michael Thibault
Mary Tompkey
John T. Tyler
Austin Yamada

    Dated: July 6, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-18314 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-278-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of August 1, 1998:

Thirty-Ninth Revised Sheet No. 32
Thirty-Ninth Revised Sheet No. 33

    CNGT states that the purpose of this filing is to submit CNGT's 
quarterly revision of the Section 18.2.B. Surcharge, effective for the 
three-month period commencing August 1, 1998. The charge for the 
quarter ending July 31, 1998, has been $0.0032 per Dt, as authorized by 
Commission Order dated April 20, 1998, in Docket No. RP98-171. CNGT's 
proposed Section 18.2.B. surcharge for the next quarterly period is 
$0.0026 per Dt. The revised surcharge is designed to recover $16,088 in 
Stranded Account No. 858 Costs.
    CNGT states that copies of this letter of transmittal and 
enclosures are being mailed to CNGT's customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18172 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEVIN SINGH

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3962

[ February 2 1, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 014222

CF10A

.

Khurrum B. Wahid of Wahid Vizcaino, LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T.

Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed.

G ROSS

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.