alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			Vaccines site
			Vaccines site
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


AdultVaxView


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








Vaccination Coverage among Adults										Related Pages
										AdultVaxView
User Quick Guide | Download Data Table | Back to AdultVaxView main page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  May 14, 2021						Source: 
	National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeAdultVaxView Home
AdultVaxView Interactive!plus icon
General Population
Nursing Home
Pregnant Women
Publications and Resources
Data Sources
Objectives, Targets, and Indicators
For Specific Groupsplus icon
Adults
College and Technical School Students
Healthcare Professionals
Pregnant Women
Media


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
Exhibit 23

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Esterline Technologies Corporation ofour report dated December 10, 2004, included in the 2004 Annual Report toShareholders of Esterline Technologies Corporation. 

Our audits also included thefinancial statement schedule of Esterline Technologies Corporation listed inItem 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financialstatement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information setforth therein. 

We also consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-43843,No. 33-58375, No. 333-62650, and No. 333-85440 and Form S-3 No. 333-117905) pertaining to the 1997Stock Option Plan, Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan, Amended andRestated 1997 Stock Option Plan, the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of EsterlineTechnologies Corporation and the $300,000,000 Shelf Registration Statement of our report dated December 10, 2004, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our reportincluded in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement scheduleincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Esterline Technologies Corporation forthe fiscal year ended October 29, 2004. 

Ernst & Young LLP
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC**

**ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 FileNos. 333-58033, 333-54166 and 333-115563) pertaining to the 1997 EquityIncentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation of our reports dated March 6, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedules of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation, Dynamic Materials Corporation management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst & YoungLLP

Denver, Colorado

March 6, 2007

 

----
No. 10-10870.

#### Carlos Portillo-Quezada, aka Luis Quezada, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 183,

181 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6424.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*93Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 86.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 13, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00110

- CV

Tobbie Tineeka Jones, Appellant

v.

Tamar Hays Jones, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICE S GOODWIN AND BOURLA ND
REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 8, 2013 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands

the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion

. The

appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,377
<INVENTORY>                                    171,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               338,409
<PP&E>                                         164,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,530)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,932
<BONDS>                                        121,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       266,683
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,959
<SALES>                                        632,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,993
<CGS>                                          450,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,356)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
        

</TABLE>
*DLM 4000.25-4, August 15, 2018*

*Change 5*

**AP4. APPENDIX 4**

**SPECIAL PROCESSING RULES CONTACTS**

AP4.1.******GENERAL

For specific information on the Department of Defense (DoD)******Component/Participating Agency special processing rules, contact the Defense Automatic Addressing System (DAAS) Customer Service Support at:

DAAS – Logistics Support.

Phone: Commercial (614) 692-6672 Option 2 / DSN: (312) 850-6672 Option 2.

FAX: Commercial (937) 656-3800 / DSN 986.3800.

Customer Service Support: For assistance with DAAS application Issues, Logistics Support, or Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Support please utilize the DAAS webpage at: *https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daashome/customerassistance.asp*

Or, e-mail may be sent directly to: *daascustomersupport@dla.mil*

***General / Logistics -****daascustomersupport@dla.mil*

***EDI -****EDI@dla.mil*

	AP4-1 	APPENDIX 4
NUMBER 13-11-00381-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JAMES CONLEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 105th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, James Conley, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to 

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the 

appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal. 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be 
2

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

29th day of September, 2011.
NO. 01

- 15

- 00284

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

LATRICE HARRIS, Appellant,

v.

HIGHLAND KNOLLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL FOR APPELL EE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Appellee Highland Knolls Community Association (“Appellee”)

files this Designation of Lead Counsel pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 6.2 to notify the Court that Frank O. Carroll III

,

State Bar No. 24082785, of Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC,

2800 Post Oak Blvd., 57 th Floor, Houston, Texas 77056, makes an

appearance in this appeal as lead counsel of record for Appellee. ACCEPTED

01-15-00284-cv
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
11/10/2015 2:43:47 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKRespectfully submitted,

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC

_____________________________________ FRANK O. CARROLL III
Texas State Bar No. 24082785
G REGG S. W EINBERG Texas State Bar No. 21084150 2800 Post Oak Blvd., 57 th Floor Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: 713

- 840

- 1666
Facsimile: 713

- 840

- 9404 fcarroll@rmwbhlaw.com gweinberg@rmwbhlaw.com
ATTORNEY S FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that this document is 25 2 words, as calculated by the word count feature of Microsoft Word 2010 (PC Edition).

_______________________________ __ FRANK O. CARROLL IIICERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon the parties listed below by facsimile, messenger, regular U.S. Mail, certified mail, return receipt requested

and/or electronic service in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this the 10 th day of November

, 201 5

.

Via Regular Mail and Via Certified Mail/RRR: 7010 1870 0003 4219 8360
Ms. Latrice L. Harris

2310 Enchanted Park Lane Katy, TX 77450

_____________________________________ Frank O. Carroll III
Imperial County Air Pollutio n Control District Rule 407

407

- 1 RULE 407 NUISANCES (Adopted prior to 2/21/72; Revised 4/27/76; 9/14/99)

No Person shall discharge from any Source whatsoever such quantities of Air Contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public or which cause or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property.

This Rule shall not apply to odors em anating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.
GOING 

SMOKEFREE 

MATTERS

www.cdc.gov/tobacco

CS260251-G

There is no safe amount of secondhand smoke exposure. The home is the main 

place many children and adults breathe in secondhand smoke.

IN YOUR HOME

The Surgeon General concluded:

There is no safe level

of secondhand 

smoke exposure.

Cleaning the air and 

ventilating buildings 

cannot get rid of 

secondhand smoke.

Approximately 58 million

(1 in 4) nonsmokers are 

exposed to secondhand smoke.

About 2 in 5 children (including 7 in 

10 black children) are exposed to 

secondhand smoke.

In the United States:

The home is the main place 

where children are exposed to 

secondhand smoke.

What is secondhand smoke?

It is the combination of smoke from the burning end of a cigarette and the smoke breathed out by 

a smoker. When a person smokes near you, you can be exposed to secondhand smoke.

Secondhand smoke causes 

disease and early death in 

children and in adults who 

do not smoke.

Print Only
Did You Know?

Only 100% smokefree indoor air fully protects from secondhand smoke exposure.

Secondhand smoke exposure among 

babies and children can cause:

• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

• Lung problems

• Ear infections

• Asthma attacks

Secondhand smoke exposure 

among adults can cause:

• Heart disease

• Stroke

• Lung Cancer

Secondhand smoke can travel

through doorways, cracks in 

walls, electrical lines, ventilation 

systems and plumbing.

www.cdc.gov/tobacco

Opening windows using fans heating, air conditioning 

and ventilation systems

cannot eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke. 

In fact, these systems can distribute secondhand smoke throughout a building.

Print Only
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.41. APPENDIX 3.41**

**MATERIEL RECEIPT FOLLOW-UP**

**OTHER THAN PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT SOURCE**

## 

**AP3.45-**

AP3.41-1

APPENDIX 3.41
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63**

**OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**

 

I, David R. Asplund, the Chief Executive Officer of Lime Energy Co., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

1.               The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.

 

 
| /s/   David R. Asplund    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| David   R. Asplund        |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |   |
| May   12, 2011            |   |

 

----
1	 Pre-decisional: for internal use only. 

Tips	From	Former	Smokers	Tips	2018/Vignettes	

Sharon/“Peer	Pressure”	:39	

The	vignette opens	on	the	title	“Peer	Pressure.	A	Former	Smoker’s	Story,”	and	cuts	to	a	shot	of	Sharon	

sitting	in	a	chair	by	a	table	inside	her	home,	speaking	to	the	camera.			

SHARON:	I	started	junior	high	school.	

We	then	see	a	photo	of	Sharon	as	a	young	girl.	

SHARON:	Peer	pressure,	that’s	why	I	started.	To	be	cool,	to	fit	in.	

The	vignette	cuts	back	to	Sharon,	speaking	to	the	camera.	

SHARON:	Everybody	smoked,	that	was,	like,	the	cool	thing	to	do.	

We	then	see	a	photo	of	Sharon	with	her	granddaughter.		

SHARON:	With	my	granddaughter,	she’s	12	years	old,	she’s	in	junior	high	now—

The	vignette	cuts	back	to	Sharon.	

SHARON:	And	that’s	what	I’m	afraid	of,	you	know.	She’s	gonna	get	in	with	a	kid	that’s—	

We	then	see	Sharon,	typing	on	her	computer.		

SHARON:	“Oh	let’s	try	it”.	

The	vignette	cuts	back	to	Sharon,	speaking	to	the	camera.				

SHARON:	Don’t	even	start	because	it	doesn’t	take	long—

We	see	Sharon	standing	in	front	of	the	bathroom	mirror.	

SHARON:	to	get	hooked.	

The	vignette	cuts	back	to	Sharon,	speaking	to	the	camera.				

SHARON:	I	think	she	is	smart	enough—		

The	vignette	ends	with	Sharon	looking	at	herself	in	the	mirror,	her	reflection	visible	to	the	viewer.		

SHARON:	to	learn	from	my	mistake.	
2	 Pre-decisional: for internal use only. 

ART	CARD:	CDC	LOGO		

BROUGHT	TO	YOU	BY	THE	U.S.	DEPARTMENT	OF	HEALTH	AND	HUMAN	SERVICES.
#### *Filo Foods, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. City of Seatac et al.,*Respondents,

No. 90113-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70758-2-I, February 10, 2014, 179 Wn. App. 401. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL BARNES,

Respondent.

No. 4D17-3607

[December 19, 2018]

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; William W. Haury, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-010380-

CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the circuit court’s order granting a criminal 

defendant’s motion to vacate a plea. Under Florida Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.140(c)(1), an order granting a defendant’s motion to vacate a 

plea is not among the orders that the state may appeal. We treat the notice 

of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 

250 (Fla. 1988); State v. Stapleton, 764 So. 2d 886, 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2000). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari for failure to show a 

departure from the essential requirements of the law resulting in material 

injury for the remainder of the case.

GROSS, MAY, JJ., and CARACUZZO, CHERYL, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Life cycle of Rhipicephalus sanguineus and the transmission of 

Rickettsia rickettsii (the causative agent of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever)

 1

Adult 

female

Eggs

Adult females drop

off host to lay eggs

2

Larva

Eggs hatch into

six-legged larvae

The possibility exists for

transmission from larvae

(infected transovarially)

to humans but requires

further investigation

 3 Larvae feed on first host

and may acquire R. rickettsii

 4

Nymph

Larvae molt into nymphs

after leaving first host

Infected nymphs may

feed on humans and

transmit R. rickettsii

5 Nymphs feed on second host

and may acquire R. rickettsii

6

Adult 

male

Adult 

female

Nymphs molt into adults

after leaving second host

Infected adults may feed

on humans and transmit

R. rickettsii

7 Adults attach to the third host for feeding 

and mating, and may acquire R. rickettsii

Images are not drawn to scale. R. sanguineus can maintain R. rickettsii between life stages.

Humans, as well as dogs, may become infected when bitten by a tick infected with R. rickettsii.

CS246081-A
No. 10-6583.

#### Francisco Javier Medina, Petitioner v. Larry E. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1064,

178 L. Ed. 2d 878,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1003.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 651, 178 L. Ed. 2d 489, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9408.
No. 10-1224.

#### Pest Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Ross Miller, Secretary of State of Nevada.

565 U.S. 815, 132 S. Ct. 94,

181 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6861.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 1097.
No. 09-10978.

#### Gustavo Castro, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 127,

178 L. Ed. 2d 77,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5886.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-11044.

#### Phillip C. Lathrop, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 864, 132 S. Ct. 206,

181 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6039.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 931.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.21. APPENDIX 3.21**

# logistics reassignment due-in reconciliation response

## 

2

**AP3.21-**

AP3.21-1

APPENDIX 3.21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                         215,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,819,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   228,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,776,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,437,504      
<PP&E>                                       1,156,414     
<DEPRECIATION>                                 341,052   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,257,968     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,526,080   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                     1,079,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,652,240      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,257,968        
<SALES>                                     19,253,467         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,253,467         
<CGS>                                        8,083,221         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,116,797         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               860,786      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             297,849      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,918,035      
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,112,700     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,805,335     
<DISCONTINUED>                               (326,621) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,478,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
159 A.3d 886

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KASEEM CAMEL, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.