alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC  20301-3000

           LOGISTICS AND

    MATERIEL READINESS 

DLM 4000.25-4, November 26, 2019

Change 6

DEFENSE AUTOMATIC ADDRESSING SYSTEM

CHANGE 6

I.  This change to DLM 4000.25-4, Defense Automatic Addressing System (DAAS), June 5, 2012, is published by direction of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Supply Chain Integration under the authority of DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4140.01, “DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Policy,” December 14, 2011.  Unless otherwise noted, revised text in the manual is identified by***bold, italicized***print.  Exceptions are when an entire chapter or appendix is replaced, a new one added, or an administrative update is made.  Administrative updates in Change 6 include the following: "DLA Transaction Services" is changed to "Defense Automatic Addressing System (DAAS)" to reflect the most recent name change in accordance with DLA General Order 12-17.  Abbreviations such as etc., e.g., and i.e. are incorporated inside the parentheses.  Occurrences of “shall” are changed to “will” per a style change for DoD issuances.  In addition, minor typographical and similar editing errors in previous versions have been corrected.

II. This change includes Approved Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS) Changes (ADC) published by Enterprise Business Standards Office memorandum:  ADC 1344 dated June 19, 2019.  (Administrative Update) Removes unused and outdated Federal EDI implementation conventions (IC) from the Enterprise Business Standards Office (EBSO) Website.  Unless noted, EBSO does not maintain or update these Federal ICs.  Revises Chapter 5.  

III.  The list below identifies the chapters, appendices, or other files from the manual that are updated by this change:

IV.  This change is incorporated into the on-line DLM 4000.25 series of manuals and the PDF files containing the entire set of change files on the publications page of the Enterprise Business Standards Office Website: www.dla.mil/does/dlms-pubs

# image1.png

# image2.png
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.65 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.65 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.65 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.65 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### *In re Adoption of C.H.,*

No. 91781-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72464-9-1, April 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1017. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 157 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2726 

[Report No. 116–199] 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 

trains. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Ms. MOORE and Mr. GRIJALVA

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2726 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking 

on Amtrak trains. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2726 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Banning Smoking on 

5 Amtrak Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING ON AMTRAK TRAINS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 243 of title 49, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘§ 24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains 

11 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Beginning on the date of enact12 ment of the Banning Smoking on Amtrak Act of 2019, 

13 Amtrak shall prohibit smoking on board Amtrak trains. 

14 ‘‘(b) ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES.— 

15 ‘‘(1) INCLUSION.—The use of an electronic cig16 arette shall be treated as smoking for purposes of 

17 this section. 

18 ‘‘(2) ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE DEFINED.—In 

19 this section, the term ‘electronic cigarette’ means a 

20 device that delivers nicotine or other substances to 

21 a user of the device in the form of a vapor that is 

22 inhaled to simulate the experience of smoking.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec24 tions for chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is 

25 amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 157 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2726 

[Report No. 116–199] 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit 

smoking on Amtrak trains. 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
November 10, 2021

Dear Tribal Leader:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry (ATSDR), and American Indian and Alaskan Native (AI/AN) Federally Recognized Tribes share 

the goal of establishing clear policies to further the government-to- government relationship between 

the United States government and federally recognized AI/AN tribes. Effective consultation results in 

information exchange, mutual understanding, and informed decision-making.

CDC/ATSDR would like to thank all the tribal leaders and tribal partners who provided recommendations 

to improve the CDC/ATSDR Tribal Consultation Policy to better engage with AI/AN Federally Recognized 

Tribes. CDC/ATSDR recognizes our unique relationship with AI/AN federally recognized tribes and are 

committed to fulfilling our critical role in promoting the health and safety of AI/AN people.

CDC/ATSDR hosted a virtual tribal consultation session on August 5, 2021, to collect input from tribal 

leaders on the CDC/ATSDR Tribal Consultation Policy. CDC/ATSDR has reviewed all testimonies received 

during the consultation period, July 2–September 7, 2021. CDC/ATSDR received input from 12 tribal 

nations and 4 tribal partners. The agency summarized tribal leaders’ responses to the consultation’s 

guiding questions and provided initial responses to the most frequent recommendations in a summary 

report titled, “Tribal Consultation on CDC/ATSDR’s Tribal Consultation Policy.” In this report, CDC/ATSDR 

categorized recommendations into recurring themes: 1) better coordination with tribes, with the 

CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC), and across HHS agencies; 2) accountability in reporting

and follow-up; 3) use of all relevant channels of communication and standardizing communication with 

tribes; 4) advanced notice of consultations via “Dear Tribal Leader” letters; 5) increased guidance on 

consultation procedures; 6) adequate prep time for upcoming tribal consultations; 7) meeting 

mechanism and increased flexibility in meeting options; 8) increased proactivity in providing technical 

assistance; 9) prioritization of tribal public health infrastructure and capacity; and 10) tribal funding

flexibility and transparency.

For next steps, CDC/ATSDR will work to incorporate the recommendations into the current CDC/ATSDR 

Tribal Consultation Policy. We will then work with the CDC/ATSDR TAC for review before presenting a 

revised consultation policy. 

If you have questions about the “Tribal Consultation on CDC/ATSDR’s Tribal Consultation Policy Report”, 

please email us at tribalsupport@cdc.gov. 

Sincerely,

José T. Montero, MD, MHCDS

Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1 www.cdc.gov/tribal/consultation-support/tribal-consultation/policy.html
Opinion issued April 30, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00714
- CV

——————————— RAMESH KAPUR D/B/ A AIC MANAGEMENT , Appella nt V. ENGELHARDT LAW , P LLC AND STEVEN ENGELHARDT , Appell e e s

On Appeal f

rom the 2 70th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2017
- 56784

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant , Ramesh Kapur, doing business as A IC Manage ment Company,
ha s failed to tim ely file a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 38.6(a) , 38.8( a)

. After being
notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal for appellant ’ s failure to file a
brief , ap pellant d id not adequately respond. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b) , (c)

.2

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for f ailure to timely file a
brief

. We dismiss any pendin g motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Key es , Goodman , and Countiss

.
No. 10-7676.

#### Majed Subh, Petitioner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1051,

178 L. Ed. 2d 871,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1060.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 31.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40310 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN PEREZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-03-CR-891-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan PerezMartinez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21074 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rilwan was mailed a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.48. APPENDIX 3.48**

**SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT SUBSTITUTE ITEM REJECTION**

## 

2

**AP3.52-**

AP3.48-1

APPENDIX 3.48
\()·-..1TCERIFINALREPORTMarch25,2009ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumber()STATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,Kunune\IISponsorTitleStudynumber()GLPSTATEMENT45068ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitle()·.,_./Studymunber()45068QUALITYASSURANCESTATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,Kurume\()()-1-()c)-2-()c)-3-Cl(.)--·-·'-4-(")·-....··(I-5-()-6--7--8-()()-9-()()-10-(l-11-()-12-Cl(-)-13-ClC>-14-()(-)-.,___-15-()-16-(')()-17-C)c)-18-(_)-19-()-20-r··.,_)(!-21-()(i-22-(_)-23--24-C)()-25-(l()-26-CJ-27-(-)'·-...·'-28-CJ-29-0-30-()·--31-()-32-()()-33-(l(J-34--35-Cl()-36-()-37-CJ-38-()-39--40-C;-41-Cl-42-()()-43-(_)-44--45--46-()()-47-(l-·---.l)-48-CJ-49-c)-50-()c)-51-Cl-52-c)-53-c)-54-()-55-Cl-56-()(l-57-()()-58--59-()-60--61--62-CJ-63-()\..._/-64--65--66--67-()·---68-()-69--70--71-()-72-()·-------0-73--74-()()-75-0-76-C!0-77--78-()()-80-(Jl)-81--82-00-84-0()()-86-()-87-()-88-C)-89-()()-90-CJ()-91-()-92-u-93-Cl-94-C!-95-()0-98-()()-99-()()-100-()()-101--102--103-().-104-()-106-()......,_.c)-107-0-108-()()-110-()0()()-114-00-115-0-116--117-()-118-()-119-,..-c·..c )()-120--121-()-122--123--124-n·-----0-125--126-()()-127-0-128-()...'C>-129-(')()-130-()()-131-()-132--133--134-("'\·-..__/l)-135-()-136-Cl-137-f\\J(·.\._)-138-()-139-()-;_,_.-140-()(_)-141-C'l-·..,C)-142-()-.:..,_,/-143-()-144-(··...·,.)-145-()-146-()"-:....-147-()-148-(J-149-()'·..()-150-()-151-(')()-152--153--154-(\··..._)C!-155--156--157-()()-159--160-r.''··)-161-()-162-C!c_)-163-()-164--165-0-166--167--168-n·..•-169-(·-\-170-()(._)-172.--173-()-174--175-()-176-()-177-()........-178-()-179-()-180-c)()-181-•-182-( )-183-Cl(J-184--185-()()-186-0()-187-c:J()-188-()()...._....-189-C!-190-()-191-,.-...()()-192-0-193-()-194-Cl-195-(')(l-196--197-CJ-198--199--200-()-201-(')()-2.02.--203-()-204-()-205--206-c.J-207-c)()-208--209--210-()-211--212-\___)-213-('__)-214--215--216-('i·._.'._j-217--218-(-.._)-219--220-c)()-221-()-222--223-()··.,_...()-224-()-225-(J-226--227-()()-228-C]-229--230-()-._..-231-('._)-232-()-233--234-(J-235-()-236-('·,__)-237-()-238--239-()-240-CJ-241-(J-242-()-243--244-C)-245--246--247-()-248-0-249-_)()-250--251-()-252-()()-253-(')-254-(")-255--256-r,-257-Cl("").,__,-258--259-()-260-()-261-()·-,...!()-Z62-()'-263-()()-264-()-265-()....-266--267--268-.)-.::····::·-269-(J-270-()-271-0-272-r··,('---)()-....,.....--273--274-0-275-C),..-·······.,,t.,__)-276-()()-277-C)-278--279-( i•,._..,.>-280--281-()-282--283--284--285-(-)-286--287--288--289--290-()..._..·(J-291--292-001¥-PX;1 9iF1 2foJ2 1BJ!tffirt.ACDIA.1Elz*11600
No. 10-10569.

#### Richard Albert Rowzie, Petitioner v. Virginia.

565 U.S. 840, 132 S. Ct. 151,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6098.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to be Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
From: Wells, Barry A To: Thomas@Windway.com Subject: CAB11-5 Revision 1 clarification from Propeller Field Service Date: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 5:36:44 PM Attachments: image001.png Importance: High

Tom:
Sorry I missed your call.
CAB11-5R1 has prompted responses which Field Service would like to address/clarify. Please note the following and let me know if I can be of further assistance.

1. CAB11-5 Revision 1 highlights:

· The FAA denied the exemption for the Caravan to use the Task-Based Inspection Program in place of the Annual/100 hour items called out in Title 14 Part 43 Appendix D. (exemption denial is part of CAB11-5 R1)

· Effectivity serial range has been removed and now reflects all Caravans.

· Options for US Registered Caravans:

o Task program to be part of their 135 AAIP (AAIP are exempt from 43 App D)

o Approval to use the Task program as a Progressive Inspection (intervals will need to adjusted to meet 43 App D within the 12 month period)

o Refer to Part 11 to petition the FAA for an exemption from Part 91.409(a) and (b) in order to use the manufacturer's recommended task-based inspection program as written.

o Inspect using a checklist that includes the scope and detail of items in App D. Interval is determined if the aircraft is for hire or not.

o Continue with the Phasecard (no longer updated) with approval from their local authorities.

· Compliance has changed from Mandatory to Optional

.
· Conversion due date has been removed, to be accomplished at owners discretion.

· End of Phasecard Cycle (Phase 4, 8, 12) and Progressive (Operation 4) have been defined.

Additional information:

· FAR Reference Summary:

o FAR 91.409 (a) (1) - Annual inspection within 12 months IAW Part 43

. o FAR 91.409 (b) - For Hire Annual / 100 Hr Inspection every 100 Hrs IAW Part 43

o FAR 43.15 c) Annual & 100-hour inspections...... checklist must include the scope and detail of items in Appendix D

.
· Operators who have inadvertently signed off an Annual Inspection per Document 0A were still responsible to verify the inspection they use is compliant with their regulatory requirements.

2. The following Documents from the Cessna Caravan Task Based Inspection Program may meet the requirements of FAR 43 App D. Please note that this list of operations isnot exhaustive and may need to be expanded, as applicable to each aircraft, to address inspections for intervals other than 12 calendar months (for example, Interval 4A/5C item(s), which is completed every 1600 Hours or 60 calendar months, whichever occurs first ). Ultimately, the IA or Pt 145 repairman makes the final determination which operations meet the intent of FAR 43 Appendix D when signing of a 100 Hour Inspection or Annual Inspection under that Part.

· 0A

· 01

· 02

· 03 [excluding A281003 & A321003]

· 04 [excluding B262005]

· 06

· 07

· 08

· 09

· 10

· 11

· 20
Barry A. Wells Field Service Engineer, Field Ops Domestic Propeller Textron Aviation 715.831.0833 PHONE 715.781.0764 MOBILE BAWells@txtav.com
<PAGE>   1


                                                             Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
Nos. 333-48367 and 333-48369 of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. on Form S-8 of
our report dated April 10, 1998 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the company's plan of
reorganization), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. for the year ended January 31, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dayton, Ohio
April 27, 1998
Subject: Meeting with Holcim Inc. – Reconsideration Issues

Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Date: November 13, 2012

Participants:

Holcim (US), Inc.

Hector Ybanez

RTI International

Mike Laney

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Keith Barnett

Sharon Nizich

Hector Ybanez of Holcim requested the meeting with EPA to describe their stance on specific 

areas being addressed under the portland cement reconsideration. Mr. Ybanez covered the 

following areas:

 Correlation between THC emissions and organic HAP emissions.

 Correlation between PM emissions and parameter levels from CPMS.

 Clinker pile work practices.

 HCl performance specifications.

 Inclusion of startup and shutdown in calculating 30-day rolling averages.

 Use of PM CEMS for combined sources.

 NSPS modifications.