alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11159.

#### Donald Ray Young, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 594,

178 L. Ed. 2d 434,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8867.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 680.
No. 10-6461.

#### Joseph L. Rainey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 989,

178 L. Ed. 2d 818,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 135.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 432, 178 L. Ed. 2d 336, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8162.
# C_2015236EN.01001802.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France)) — Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Directeur régional des douanes et droits indirects d’Auvergne v Brasserie Bouquet SA

(Case C-285/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 92/83/EEC - Excise duty - Beer - Article 4 - Small independent breweries - Reduced rate of excise duty - Conditions - No operation under licence - Production in accordance with a process of a third party and authorised by it - Authorisation to use the trade marks of that third party))

(2015/C 236/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects, Directeur régional des douanes et droits indirects d’Auvergne

Applicants:

Defendant: Brasserie Bouquet SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

For the purpose of applying the reduced rate of excise duty on beer the condition laid down in Article 4(2) of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages according to which a brewery must not operate under licence, is not met if the brewery concerned makes its beer in accordance with an agreement pursuant to which it is authorised to use the trade marks and production process of a third party.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
No. 10-6062.

#### Davan Dickey, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 513,

178 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8519.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 36 So. 3d 712.
# C_2015073EN.01002601.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 — Aic v OHIM — ACV Manufacturing (Heat exchangers)

(Case T-615/13) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a heat exchanger - Ground for invalidity - Lack of visibility of part of a complex product - Article 4(2) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2015/C 073/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aic S.A. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, Legal Adviser)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ACV Manufacturing (Seneffe, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2013 (Case R 291/2012-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between ACV Manufacturing and Aic S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the year
ending June-30-1999 10-K filing and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,364,335
<SECURITIES>                                 3,674,169
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,454,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,041,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,091,114
<PP&E>                                      12,851,825
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,590,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,394,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,274,126
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       504,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,120,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,394,712
<SALES>                                     13,629,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,629,692
<CGS>                                       11,092,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,092,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,846,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,132,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                   402,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            730,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   730,601
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.B
 
 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
 (a Delaware corporation)
 BY-LAWS




---



##### 



BY-LAWS
 OF
 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
 ARTICLE I
 Stockholders
 Section 1. Annual Meetings
 Section 2. Special Meetings
 Section 3. Notice of Meetings




---



##### 



Section 4. Adjournments
 Section 5. Quorum
 Section 6. Organization
 -2-




---



##### 



Section 7. Voting; Proxies
   Section 8. Remote Communication
 Section 9. Stockholder Action Without a Meeting .
 -3-




---



##### 



Section 10. Fixing Date for Determination of Stockholders of Record
 Section 11. List of Stockholders Entitled to Vote
 -4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
 Board of Directors
 Section 1. Powers; Numbers; Qualifications
 Section 2. Election; Term of Office; Resignation; Vacancies
 Section 3. Regular Meetings
 Section 4. Special Meetings
 Section 5. Meetings By Remote Communication Permitted
 Section 6. Quorum; Vote Required for Action
 -5-




---



##### 



Section 7. Organization
 Section 8. Board Action By Consent of Directors
 Section 9. Advisory Directors
 ARTICLE III
 Committees
 Section 1. Committees of the Board
 -6-




---



##### 



Section 2. Committee Rules
 ARTICLE IV
 Officers
 Section 1. Officers; General Provisions
 -7-




---



##### 



Section 2. Chairman of the Board .
 Section 3. President
 Section 4. Vice Presidents
 -8-




---



##### 



Section 5. Secretary
 Section 6. Treasurer
 Section 7. Controller
 -9-




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 Stock
 Section 1. Certificates
 Section 2. Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Stock Certificates; Issuance of New Certificates
 ARTICLE VI
 Miscellaneous
 Section 1. Fiscal Year
 Section 2. Seal
 Section 3. Waiver of Notice of Meetings of Stockholders, Directors and Committees
 -10-




---



##### 



Section 4. Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Employees
 Section 5. Interested Directors; Quorum
 Section 6. Form of Records
 -11-




---



##### 



Section 7. Amendment of By-laws
 Section 8. Gender References
 Section 9. Electronic Transmission
 -12-
No. 10-5792.

#### Ramon Goitia-Mora, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 955, 131 S. Ct. 346,

178 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7802.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*255Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 842.
No. 10-7678.

#### Gerald Adrian Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1170, 131 S. Ct. 958,

178 L. Ed. 2d 806,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 238,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 864.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             417,915
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       30,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   448,755
<PP&E>                                              84,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (29,491)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     503,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,363
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        301,727
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         182,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       503,310
<SALES>                                             12,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,525
<CGS>                                              342,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      342,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (329,618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.06)




</TABLE>
Order entered January 30 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01290
- CR JAMES AARON WHITTLE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09
- 23785
- N



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal

. By order dated January 19, 2017, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s records from July 24, 2009 and September 16, 2016 had not been filed. On January 25, 2017, the reporter’s record from the July 24, 2009 hearing was filed. The Court has had no communication, however, regarding the reporter’s record from the September 16, 2016 hearin g. We ORDER the trial court to make findings on whether a hearing was held on September 16, 2016 and, if so, whether a reporter’s record was requested. If a reporter’s record was requested, the trial court shall deter mine the name and address of the court reporter whorecorded the proceedings in this cause and the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be

filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
whichever is earli er.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
No. 10-7747.

#### Steven Emory Butcher, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 964,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 581.

178 L. Ed. 2d 794,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 628.
No. 11-5146.

#### Louis David Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Kelly Wellman.

565 U.S. 805, 132 S. Ct. 383,

181 L. Ed. 2d 7,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6379.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
#### *Carr et al., Petitioners, v. Wash. State Liquor Control Bd. et al., Respondents,*

No. 91958-5.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46590-6-II, June 4, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 212. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-6120-1]


Washington: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve a revision to Washington's 
authorized hazardous waste program. In the final rules section of 
today's Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's request as an 
immediate final rule without a prior proposal because EPA views this 
action as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for approving the State's request is set forth in 
the immediate final rule. If no adverse written comments are received 
in response to the immediate final rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse 
written comments, EPA will withdraw the immediate final rule before the 
effective date by publishing a notice of withdrawal in the Federal 
Register. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before August 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments referring to Docket Number 6120-1 may be 
mailed to Nina Kocourek, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, WCM-122, Seattle, WA 98101, Phone: (206) 553-
6502. Copies of the materials submitted by Washington may be examined 
during normal business hours at the following locations: EPA Region 10 
Library, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, contact: (206) 553-1259; 
and the Washington Department of Ecology, 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, WA, 
98503, contact Patricia Hervieux, (360) 407-6756.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nina Kocourek, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, WCM-122, Seattle, WA 
98101. Phone: (206) 553-6502.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    For additional information see the immediate final rule published 
in the rules section of today's Federal Register.

    Dated: June 24, 1998.
Chuck Clarke,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-17683 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17812]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending June 26, 1998

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-97-2768.
    Date Filed: June 24, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: July 22, 1998.
    Description: Application of Far Eastern Air Transport Corporation 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Sections 41302, and 211.13 and Subpart Q of the 
Regulations, requests an Amendment to its Application for a Foreign Air 
Carrier Permit to engage in scheduled and charter foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail from points behind Taiwan 
via Taiwan and intermediate points to a point or points in the United 
States and beyond.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-17812 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```
Served: March 30, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 30th day of March, 2012

Michael Gurevich and Elena Gurevich

 v. DOT OST 2012-0040

 

Compagnia Aereas Italiana, S. p. A.

Formal Third Party Complaint under

14 CFR 302.404

NOTICE

By a motion dated March 27, 2012, Counsel for Compagnia Aereas Italiana, S.p.A. 

(Alitalia), requested an extension of time in which to prepare an answer in the abovereferenced third-party complaint. The motion seeks an extension from March 30 to April 

16, 2012, citing the complexity of the issues raised in the complaint. The Respondent’s 

motion advises that Counsel for the Complainant was contacted and has no objection to 

grant of the request.

Accordingly, I have decided to grant for good cause the requested extension for the filing 

of an answer in this docket to April 16. This notice is issued under authority assigned in 

14 CFR 302.405(a).

Samuel Podberesky

Assistant General Counsel for

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
2

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing notice by first class mail and by e-mail on 

the following parties as indicated below.

Nicholas Lowry

Senior Attorney

Dated: March 30, 2012

Hank Bates, Esq.

Carney Williams Bates Pulliam & Bowman, PLLC

11311 Arcade Drive, Suite 200

Little Rock, Arkansas 72212

hbates@carneywilliams.com

Counsel for Petitioners

Lawrence Mentz, Esq.

Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC

70 East 55th St., 25th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Imentz@kmalawfirm.com

and

Richard D. Mathias, Esq.

Zuckert Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P.

888 Seventeenth St. N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20006

rdmathias@zsrlaw.com

Counsel for Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. (Alitalia)

Dockets and Media Management Division (SVC-124)

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington, D.C. 20590
Exhibit 3
 Certificate of Designation of Preferences
and Rights of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
of Superior Bancorp
    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
 Description of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock.
 Section 1.
 General Dividend Obligation.
 Accrual of Dividends.
 1




---



##### 



Payment of Dividends.
 Distribution of Partial Dividend Payments.
 Section 2
 Rank. pari passu pari passu
 Series C Preference.
 2




---



##### 



Effect of Merger or Asset Sale.
 Section 3.
  Mandatory Conversion.
 Series C Restriction on Conversion Rights.
 Conversion Price.
 3




---



##### 



Mechanics of Conversion.
 Fractional Shares.
 Conversion Price Adjustments.
  4




---



##### 



Statement Regarding Adjustments.
 Treasury Stock.
 Costs.
 Reservation of Shares.
 Approvals.
 Valid Issuance.
 5




---



##### 



Section 4.
  Section 5.
   6




---



##### 



th
 By
    
    /s/ C. Stanley Bailey

C. Stanley BaileyChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy
    
    /s/ William H. Caughran

William H. CaughranGeneral Counsel and Secretary
   By
    
    /s/ C. Stanley Bailey

C. Stanley BaileyChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy
    
    /s/ William H. Caughran

William H. CaughranGeneral Counsel and Secretary
# Pentagon’s top acquisition official talks innovation, sustainment with defense industry

/ Published Sept. 2, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
No. 10-6268.

#### Chad Talada, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 821,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9733.

178 L. Ed. 2d 561,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*562Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 255.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2147

To amend chapter 21 of title 28, United States Code, to clarify the standard

by which a justice, judge, or magistrate shall disqualify himself from

a hearing.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. DECONCINI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 21 of title 28, United States Code, to

clarify the standard by which a justice, judge, or magistrate shall disqualify himself from a hearing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISQUALIFICATION OF JUSTICE, JUDGE, OR

4 MAGISTRATE.

5 Section 455(a) of title 28, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

9 new paragraph:
2

•S 2147 IS

1 ‘‘(2)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), the impar2 tiality of a justice, judge, or magistrate shall be reasonably

3 questioned if the judicial or extrajudicial actions or state4 ments of such justice, judge, or magistrate would cause

5 a reasonable person to believe that an impartial proceeding

6 is unlikely.

7 ‘‘(B) The provisions of subparagraph (A) shall not

8 be construed as the only basis to reasonably question the

9 impartiality of a justice, judge, or magistrate, such as a

10 question of such impartiality on the basis of—

11 ‘‘(i) a financial interest of a justice, judge, or

12 magistrate; or

13 ‘‘(ii) any other basis described under subsection

14 (b).’’.

Æ