alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles Rao, Respondent, v Mansoor Hatanian, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[768 NYS2d 335]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 7, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*617Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

An owner of property abutting a public sidewalk is under no duty to pedestrians to remove snow and ice that naturally accumulates upon the sidewalk in front of the premises unless a statute or ordinance specifically imposes tort liability for failing to do so *(see D ’Ambrosio v City of New York,*55 NY2d 454 [1982]; *Negron v G.R.A. Realty,*307 AD2d 282 [2003]; *Palmer v City of New York,*287 AD2d 553 [2001]). Where, as here, there is no such statute or ordinance, the failure to remove all of the snow from a storm will not result in liability unless it is shown that the property owner made the sidewalk more hazardous through negligent snow removal efforts *(see Negron v G.R.A. Realty, supra; Palmer v City of New York, supra).*In opposition to the defendant property owner’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to his claim that the defendant’s negligent shoveling of the snow made the sidewalk more hazardous *(see Vergara v City of New York,*304 AD2d 750 [2003]; *Muro v Romano,*301 AD2d 582 [2003]; *Savage v Shah,*297 AD2d 795 [2002]; *Alexis v Lessey,*275 AD2d 754 [2000]). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
**AGENDA**

**Supply Process Review Committee (PRC) 13-3**

**Thursday, September 19, 2013**

**Focused Meeting:  Materiel Receipt Acknowledgement (MRA) Report**
#### *State, Respondent, v. Medina, Petitioner,*

No. 92133-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45829-2-II, June 23, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1029. *Granted*and *remanded*to the trial court November 4, 2015.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain 

benefits paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2938 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring American 

3 Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘HAVEN 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME. 

6 Section 101(10A) of title 11, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(B)(i) includes any amount paid by any 

10 entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case 

11 the debtor and the debtor’s spouse), on a reg12 ular basis for the household expenses of the 

13 debtor or the debtor’s dependents (and in a 

14 joint case the debtor’s spouse if not otherwise 

15 a dependent); and 

16 ‘‘(ii) excludes— 

17 ‘‘(I) benefits received under the Social 

18 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); 

19 ‘‘(II) payments to victims of war 

20 crimes or crimes against humanity on ac21 count of their status as victims of such 

22 crimes; 

23 ‘‘(III) payments to victims of inter24 national terrorism or domestic terrorism, 

25 as those terms are defined in section 2331 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2938 RDS

1 of title 18, on account of their status as 

2 victims of such terrorism; and 

3 ‘‘(IV) any monthly compensation, pen4 sion, pay, annuity, or allowance paid under 

5 title 10, 37, or 38 in connection with a dis6 ability, combat-related injury or disability, 

7 or death of a member of the uniformed 

8 services, except that any retired pay ex9 cluded under this subclause shall include 

10 retired pay paid under chapter 61 of title 

11 10 only to the extent that such retired pay 

12 exceeds the amount of retired pay to which 

13 the debtor would otherwise be entitled if 

14 retired under any provision of title 10 

15 other than chapter 61 of that title.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

17 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

18 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

19 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

20 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

21 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

22 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:24 Aug 02, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2938.RDS H2938

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 2938 RDS

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### *State, Respondent, v. B.J.C., Petitioner,*

No. 92214-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45833-1-II, August 25, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1043. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-106, RM-9277]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Missoula, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Dale A. 
Ganske d/b/a L. Topaz Enterprises, Inc. proposing the allotment of 
Channel 290A to Missoula, Montana, as that community's fifth FM 
broadcast service. The channel can be allotted to Missoula without a 
site restriction at coordinates 46-51-42 and 114-00-30. Canadian 
concurrence will be requested for this allotment.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 24, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before September 8, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Dale A. Ganske, President, L. Topaz 
Enterprises, Inc., 5546-3 Century Ave., Middleton, Wisconsin 53562.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-106, adopted June 24, 1998, 
and released July 2, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-18235 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit
32.2













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Matthew M. Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/
      Matthew M. MartinMatthew
      M. MartinChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      12, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36397-36398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-620-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 16, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 12801 Fair Lakes Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 
22030 filed in Docket No. CP98-620-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to operate an 
existing point of delivery to Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc., (CMD) in 
Allegany County, Maryland under Columbia's blanket certificate issued 
in Docket No. CP83-76-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Columbia requests certification to provide this service at an 
existing point of delivery which was originally authorized under 
Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) for transportation 
service. Columbia states that the customer is CMD, the maximum daily 
quantity is 40 Dth and the estimated annual quantity is 14,600 Dth.
    Columbia constructed the existing point of delivery to CMD in 
Allegany County, Maryland, which was placed in service on May 1, 1998. 
Interconnecting facilities installed by Columbia included a 2-inch tap 
and valve. The existing point of delivery will be utilized for 
residential service. The cost of constructing the existing point of 
delivery was $4,200.
    The quantities of natural gas to be provided through the existing 
point will be within Columbia's authorized level of service. Therefore, 
there is no impact on Columbia's existing point of delivery for 
transportation service.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section

[[Page 36398]]

157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a 
protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed 
therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized 
effective the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17752 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Jeff Faistenhammer 26029 East River Road Grosse Ile, MI 48138-1855 July 13, 2015 EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111 Air and Radiation Docket, MC 2 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Re: Comments regarding EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111 Dear EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111: As a recreational boat owner I am deeply concerned with the proposal (EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111), which will increase the mandated ethanol volumes in the nation's fuel supply to record levels. If adopted, these obligations will make it more difficult for me to find fuel that is safe to use inmy boat's engine. The proposed Renewable Volume Obligations (RVO) for 2015 and 2016 will force a greater amount of ElS and higher ethanol blends to be pushed on to the American public. It is prohibited to use El5 inmy marine engine and it has been shown to cause damage. EPA should set the RVO levels so that I can be assured an adequate supply of fuel that is safe for my family's boating. I am also very concerned that not enough has been done to prevent the mis-fueling of my boat with the higher ethanol blends. The mis-fueling mitigation plans currently available, little more than one sticker on fuel pumps, do not provide sufficient protection against my inadvertently using the wrong gasoline in my boat. EPA must act to assure there is fuel available that will not put my engine at risk of being damaged and that I will not unintentionally put the wrong fuel in my boat. Thank you for your consideration of my views.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATEOF MONTANA 

# FILED

IN RE THE PETITION OF JESSICA L. WEBORG PR23-0004 

### JUN 0 12023 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of montane ORDER

Jessica L. Weborg has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State Bar ofMontana after having been on inactive status since March 2023. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted tothe active practice oflaw in the state ofMontana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this day ofJune, 2023. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 06/01/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0004
# C_2014351EN.01003001.xml

| 6.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 2 July 2014 — Psarras v ENISA

(Case F-63/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Member of the temporary staff - Termination of contract - Article 41(2)(a), of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Non-pecuniary harm - Resulting unlawful decision - Excessive breach of the rights of a third party - Automatic compensation order - Non-compliance with an annulment judgment))

2014/C 351/39

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aristidis Psarras (Heraklion, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (represented initially by P. Empadinhas, acting as Agent and subsequently by S. Purser, acting as Agent, and C. Meidanis, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment, firstly, of the decision to dismiss the applicant and, secondly, of the decision, adopted after the judgment of the CST in Case F-118/10, to appoint another member of staff to the post of accountant and, finally, compensation for the non-pecuniary harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 4 September 2012 of the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security terminating Mr Psarras’s temporary staff contract; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 4 September 2012 of the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security terminating Mr Psarras’s temporary staff contract;

| 2. | Orders the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security to pay Mr Psarras the sum of EUR 40  000 euros; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security to pay Mr Psarras the sum of EUR 40  000 euros;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Declares that the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Psarras. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Psarras.

---

(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 31.

1

---
No. 09-10514.

#### Darnel D. Walker, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden.

562 U.S. 1124, 131 S. Ct. 851,

178 L. Ed. 2d 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9641.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 85, 178 L. Ed. 2d 54, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5792.
No. 10-6942.

#### Patricia T. Patterson, Petitioner v. David Benson, et al.

562 U.S. 1113, 131 S. Ct. 830,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9754.

178 L. Ed. 2d 565,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 304.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PocketSpec Technologies Inc. (the
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Cynthia Kettl, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

JUNE 13, 2005

                                                     By: /s/  Cynthia Kettl
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Darrell L. Reed and
William J. Frost, and each of them, with full power of substitution, the
undersigned's true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute in his name and on
his behalf, in any and all capabilities, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EDO
Corporation (the "Company"), a New York corporation, for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001, and any and all other instruments which such attorneys and
agents, or either of them, deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to
comply with the annual reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms as his
own act and deed all that such attorneys and agents, and each of them, shall do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Either of such attorneys and agents shall
have, and may exercise, all of the powers hereby conferred.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed his signature this
_______ day of March, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Backcountry and Wilderness 
Plan for Joshua Tree National Park, California; Extension of Public 
Comment Period

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190 as amended), the National Park 
Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared a Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement assessing alternatives for, and potential impacts of, 
a proposed Backcountry and Wilderness Management Plan for Joshua Tree 
National Park, California. In deference to public interest expressed to 
date from local governmental agencies, organizations, and other 
interested parties, the original 90 day public comment period has been 
extended for one month. Written comments on the draft document must now 
be received or post-marked not later than February 28, 1998, and should 
be directed to the Superintendent, Joshua Tree National Park, 74485 
National Park Drive, Twentynine Palms, California, 92277.

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West.
[FR Doc. 98-1734 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.


/s/ David C. Swanson

David C. Swanson
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       51