alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000033565
<NAME> ESSEX GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,930
<INVENTORY>                                    166,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               332,805
<PP&E>                                         270,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 744,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,884
<BONDS>                                        388,016
<COMMON>                                       104,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   744,468
<SALES>                                      1,201,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,203,590
<CGS>                                        1,030,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,030,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,971
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-6596.

#### Samuel L. Henderson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 535,

178 L. Ed. 2d 393,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8450.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 736.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.8A


              FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT NO.
                          FW-[ ] OF NETWORK PLUS CORP.

         Reference is made to the Common Stock purchase warrant No. FW-5 (the
"WARRANT") issued by Network Plus Corp. (the "COMPANY") to [        ], or its
registered assigns ("[ ]") entitling [ ] to purchase [ ] duly authorized,
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the "COMMON STOCK") of the Company at the purchase price per
share of $7.01 (the "PURCHASE PRICE"), at any time or from time to time prior to
5:00 P.M., New York City time, on September 27, 2003 (or such earlier date as
may be determined pursuant to section 3 of the Warrant), all subject to the
terms, conditions and adjustments set forth in the Warrant.

         Reference is also made that certain Credit and Guaranty Agreement,
dated as of September 27, 2000, as amended by the First Amendment, dated
February 9, 2001, as further amended by the Second Amendment, dated July 19,
2001, as further amended by the Third Amendment, dated August 10, 2001 (the
"CREDIT AGREEMENT"), by and among Network Plus, Inc., the Company, the Lenders
party hereto from time to time, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as a Joint
Lead Arranger, Book Runner and as Syndication Agent, Fleet Securities, Inc., as
a Joint Lead Arranger, DLJ Bridge Finance, Inc., as Documentation Agent and
Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Agent.

         The Company agrees that upon the date on which the aggregate amount of
all outstanding Loans under the Credit Agreement first exceeds $165,000,000, the
Warrant shall hereby be amended, and as of such date is hereby amended, to amend
(i) all references to the Warrant Price therein from $7.01 to $2.80 and (ii) all
references to $7.01 therein to $2.80.



                                            NETWORK PLUS CORP.


                                            By:_____________________________

                                            Title:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3895-3896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

[Notice 1998-2]


Privacy Act of 1974; Republication and Notice of New Routine Uses 
for Disclosure

agency: Federal Election Commission.

action: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: On December 15, 1997, the Federal Election Commission 
published a proposed notice of amended and/or revised systems of 
records. There having been no comments or changes made in the amended/
revised systems, these

[[Page 3896]]

proposed systems of records become effective January 27, 1998.

    Dated: January 21, 1998.
Joan Aikens,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-1842 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
NO. TTiT'. qrff

IN THE INTEREST OF

CHILDREN

§ IN THE DISTRICT COURT

§ 304'" JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§ DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER OF APPOINTMENT FOR PARENT UNDER TITLE II

TO:

FAX NO:

TELEPHONE NO:

EMAIL:

On this day,, the Court made an initial determination of indigence for

Q. ".-JT and finds that the parent of the

subject child(rcn) is indigent.

Pursuant to Texas Family Code you are hereby appointed to represent the parent of the

child(ren) who is indigent.

You are hereby ORDERED to make contact with your client within twenty-four hours from

today to complete the attached indigence form and shall file the completed form along with responsive

pleadings with the court within seventy-two hours from today.

Such appointment continues until released by the Court. Such appointment concludes upon

entry of a final order. The next hearing in scheduled for for a

hearing.

Signed the <2^ of , 2017.

JUDGE

DA:

1500S58

JOAATTY

ORDER - APPOINT ATTORNEY

130S124

FILED

17-0477

6/16/2017 12:11:38 PM

tex-17667517

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
No. 10-6248.

#### Deshawn Gopie, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 487,

178 L. Ed. 2d 308,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7986.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 347 Fed. Appx. 495.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
<NAME> ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  560,024,147
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     80,976
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      34,989,771
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    45,684,108
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             640,779,002
<COMMON>                                    15,740,602
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  116,972,646
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         49,579,584
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             182,292,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,000,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       181,933,425
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          69,000,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             195,522,745
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              640,779,002
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  110,358,349
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         7,360,461
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  76,154,447
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  83,514,908
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     26,843,441
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           2,715,285
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              29,558,726
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    12,803,562
<NET-INCOME>                                16,755,164
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    813,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               15,942,164
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    16,342,106
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   13,011,069
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      20,605,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO/CFO

                             EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      Each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of EMS Technologies, Inc. hereby individually certifies that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EMS
Technologies, Inc.

In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered this
Certification on this 2nd day of May, 2005.

/s/ Alfred G. Hansen                       /s/ Don T. Scartz
-----------------------                    -----------------------
Alfred G. Hansen                           Don T. Scartz
Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Financial Officer
EMS Technologies, Inc.                     EMS Technologies, Inc.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Afeworki, Petitioner,*

No. 92205-5.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70762-1-I, August 10, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 327. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
# C_2016314EN.01000201.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2016 — DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-540/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the inscription of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))

(2016/C 314/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and P.-A. Schütter, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---
Mass power



### ~nien

**ll ield**  **ffl' ~lll**  **Ai Stack** 

**:** <400'AGL Class D , SFC-2700'MSL Class E , 2700'MSL and above Radio : CT 134 . 85 , CTAF 122 . 95

Dighton Power Stack : <400' AG L Class G Airspace

**"'' fl**  **"- "'**  **Radio**

**:** 122 . 7 - CTAF
Approved Change 48A 

Addendum for Revision to DLMS Supplement:

Material Release Order 

1. ORIGINATOR: Supply Process Review Committee, Ellen Hilert, Co-Chair, DLA 

J673, Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO), 703-767-0676 (DSN 

427), ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply

3. REFERENCE: DLMSO memorandum, Approved DLMS Change 48, Revisions to

DLMS Supplements: Material Release Order and Material Release Advice 

(Supply/MILSTRIP), December 12, 2001

4. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Addendum for Revision to DLMS Supplement: Material Release Order

b. Description of Change: This change modifies the DLMS Supplement (DS) 

940R Material Release to add an additional data element to support lateral redistribution 

orders. Apparently, this data element was inadvertently dropped during development of 

the LRO under DLMS. The DLSS field legend identifies the data element as “Date of 

Receipt of Demand.”

c. Procedures: Revise DLMS Supplement for 940R, Material Release as follows. 

# Location Revision Reason Federal IC 

1 2/G6201/0900 Add new qualifier and associated note:

LD Last Demand

DLMS Note: Use for LRO to identify the date of receipt of 

the demand document as recorded in that document by the 

initial recipient in the supply distribution system

Provides functionality 

available under current 

DLSS and is required to 

support DLSS-DLMS 

conversion

Add new code. 

Requires 

Federal IC 

change prior to 

DS update 

d. Alternatives: None identified.

5. REASON FOR CHANGE: This change supports DLMS implementation and 

desired functionality. The missing data element was identified during testing of 

conversion processing. This date was added to the LRO function to support logistics 

response time metrics and identification of delays in processing the original requisition.
6. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Supports DLMS implementation

b. Disadvantages: None identified 

7. IMPACT: 

a. Publications. Federal Implementation Conventions 940R and corresponding 

DoD 4000.25-M DLMS Supplement. The DS revision requires prior change to the 

Federal Implementation Convention (IC). All applicable revisions will submitted to the 

Federal IC

b. DAAS DLMS/DLSS conversion map has been modified to incorporate above 

revision.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No GT98-59-000]


Questar Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 24, 1998, Questar Pipeline Company 
(Questar) tendered for filing a Gas Research Institute (GRI) Tier 1 
Refund Report in compliance with the Commission's February 22, 1995, 
Order Approving Refund Methodology for 1994 Overcollection in Docket 
No. RP95-124-000 (February 22 Order).
    Questar states that on May 29, 1998, it received a $517,396 refund 
from GRI, representing an overcollection of the 1997 GRI Tier 1 funding 
target level set for Questar by GRI. Questar states that on June 12, 
1998, in compliance with the February 22 Order, it sent the GRI Tier 1 
refund, pro rata, to its eligible firm customers. Questar further 
states, that in compliance with the February 22 Order, the GRI refund 
was exclusive of interest.
    Questar states that a copy of the refund report has been served 
upon its affected transportation customers who received a refund and 
the Public Service Commission of Utah and the Public Service Commission 
of Wyoming.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 7, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17888 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17470]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, June 29, 1998.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Two Personnel Actions. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and 
(6).
    The Board voted unanimously that Agency business requires that a 
meeting be held with less than the usual seven days advance notice, 
that it be closed to the public, and that earlier announcement of this 
was not possible.
    The Board voted unanimously to close the meeting under the 
exemptions stated above. Deputy General Counsel James Engel certified 
that the meeting could be closed under those exemptions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17470 Filed 6-26-98; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
No. 10-705.

#### Olga Barcenas-Barrera, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1201, 131 S. Ct. 1052,

178 L. Ed. 2d 866,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1053.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 100.
Filed 4/24/14 P. v. Garcia CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. JESUS A. GARCIA, Defendant and Appellant. D064066

(Super. Ct. No. SCS234681)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superi or Court of San Diego County, Ana L. Espana, Judge. Affirmed.

David L. Kelly, under appointment by th e Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. A jury found Jesus A. Garcia guilty of second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a); count 1) and two counts of misd emeanor child abuse (Pen . Code § 273a, subd. (b); counts 3 and 4). The court sentenced him to prison for 15 years to life for second2 degree murder, with credit for tim e served on the misdemeanor counts. Garcia appeals. We affirm.
BACKGROUND In 2009, Garcia's wife, Maribel Arteaga, began an affair with a coworker, Carlos Orga. Garcia learned of the affair and became upset. In October or November, Arteaga left Garcia and began living with Orga, bringing with her Garcia and Arteaga's two young

sons. Garcia spoke of killing Arteaga. One evening in December 2009, he knocked on her door. Arteaga, followed by one of their sons, answered the knock. Garcia said he wanted to take the boy to McDo nald's. Arteaga said no. Ga rcia grabbed the boy's hand. Arteaga grabbed Garcia and pulled the boy aw ay from him. Garcia pushed Arteaga into the wall and stabbed her in the back with a knif e. Arteaga fell to the floor, bleeding. Her sons knelt by her side. Arteaga died from the stab wound. Ga rcia admitted stabbing and killing her.
DISCUSSION Appointed appellate counsel has f iled a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argu ment for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders ). We granted Garcia permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders has disclosed no3 reasonably arguable appellate issues. Garc ia has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

HALLER, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:

AARON, J.

IRION, J.
February 16, 2023

Dear Tribal Leader:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Agency for Toxic Substances and 

Disease Registry (ATSDR), and American Indian and Alaskan Native (AI/AN) federally 

recognized tribes share the goal of establishing clear policies to further the government-togovernment relationship between the United States Government and federally recognized AI/AN 

tribes. Effective consultation results in information exchange, mutual understanding, and 

informed decision-making.

Thank you for your recommendations on strengthening relationships during the implementation 

of CDC’s Moving Forward initiative. CDC/ATSDR is seeking feedback on how the agency can 

better engage with Indian Country through meaningful consultation. We heard from tribes on 

their priorities as we transition out of the COVID-19 public health emergency and how 

CDC/ASTDR can better support tribes and tribal communities moving forward.

We use various methods to gather input on CDC’s Moving Forward initiative and tribes’ public 

health priorities, including the hybrid tribal consultation session held on February 9, 2023, and 

collecting public comments through the Federal Register Notice published on December 13, 

2022 [FR Doc 2022-26958]. We understand the importance of providing timely and clear 

responses to AI/AN federally recognized tribes, and we remain committed to holding open and 

meaningful engagement.

We continue to accept written recommendations and feedback until 5:00 pm (EST) on February 

24, 2023; comments may be submitted by email to the Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic 

Alliances at tribalsupport@cdc.gov. After the comment period for FR. Doc. 2022-26958

concludes, we will provide you with a report summarizing the feedback and next steps by May 

27, 2023. 

Sincerely,

Leslie Ann Dauphin, PhD

Acting Designated Federal Official, CDC/ATSDR 

Director, National Center for State, Tribal, Local and 

Territorial Public Health Infrastructure and 

Workforce, proposed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
No. 10-7415.

#### Glenn Barry McDougald, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 839,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9645.

178 L. Ed. 2d 570,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 299.