alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carmen P. Tarantino, Esq., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v John Kane et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 429]-

Appeals and cross appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Notaro, J.), entered October 1, 2002, which, inter alia, granted in part plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating that part of the fourth ordering paragraph denying that part of the motion of defendants John Kane and Kaleida Health seeking to compel production of plaintiffs’ tax returns and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of defendants John Kane and Kaleida Health seeking to compel production of plaintiffs’ tax returns without reviewing those tax returns in camera. An in camera review is required in order to determine whether the records contain information relevant to the claim of plaintiffs that they sustained pecuniary damage because Kaleida Health transferred nine cases from plaintiff law firm to other law firms *(see Carter v Fantauzzo,*256 AD2d 1189, 1190 [1998]). We therefore modify the order accordingly, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court, Erie County, to determine that part of the motion of those defendants following an in camera review of the tax returns at issue.

We note that the court erred in determining in its written decision that plaintiffs properly alleged lost revenues as the measure of damages in this action alleging slander, intentional *1445inducement of breach of contract and prima facie tort. Rather, plaintiffs’ pecuniary damage is measured by the loss of profits that plaintiffs would have earned on the nine cases transferred to other law firms, i.e., the loss of revenues from those cases less any expenses that plaintiffs would have incurred with respect to them *(see generally McRoberts Protective Agency v Lansdell Protective Agency,*61 AD2d 652, 655-656 [1978]).

We reject the contention of defendants Mary J. Murray, Esq. and Roach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C. that the court erred in denying that part of their motion seeking leave to serve an amended answer alleging as an affirmative defense that plaintiff Carmen P Tarantino, Esq. is defamation-proof. Those defendants failed to establish that the proposed affirmative defense has any merit (see *generally Curran v Auto Lab Serv. Ctr.,*280 AD2d 636, 637 [2001]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Tacoma NAA Data

Certified Design Values98th percentile values2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

Tacoma, South L Street 530530029 42.7 45.3 44 47.6 21.4 Design Values2 2006-08 2007-09 2008-10 2009-11

Tacoma, South L Street 530530029 44 46 38 35Non-FRM, Non-FEM Design Value Calculations2006-201198th percentile values2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

Tacoma Tide flats - 2301 Alexander Ave 530530031 36.5 33.8 21.6 30.1 18.1 Puyallup 5722 66th Ave E 530530022 ND1 ND1 22.4 24.6 16.8 

Puyallup South Hill 530531018 33.7 31.9 21.9 26.8 18.6 Design Values2 2006-08 2007-09 2008-10 2009-11

Tacoma Tide flats - 2301 Alexander Ave 530530031 31 29 23 24Puyallup 5722 66th Ave E 530530022 ND1 ND1 21 21

Puyallup South Hill 530531018 29 27 22 221. ND = complete data set not available2. 98th percentile values and design values are determined per Appendix N to Part 50.
# C_2016156EN.01003302.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2016 — Nezi v OHIM — Etam (E)

(Case T-645/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark E - Earlier Community figurative mark E - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Reputation - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 156/43)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evcharis Nezi (Mykonos, Greece) (represented by: A. Salkitzoglou, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Etam SAS (Clichy, France) (represented by: G. Barbaut and A. Champanhet, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2013 (Case R 329/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Etam SAS and Mrs Evcharis Nezi.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses the cross-claim; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the cross-claim;

| 3. | Orders Mrs Evcharis Nezi and Etam SAS to each bear half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), and to each pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mrs Evcharis Nezi and Etam SAS to each bear half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), and to each pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.

1

---
# Introduction

# GenericV2.0.1

# GenericV2.0

# STDv1.0.x

# all other versions of STD MMG
No. 10-779.

#### William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, et al., Petitioners v. IMS Health Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1127, 131 S. Ct. 857,

178 L. Ed. 2d 623,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 14.

January 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 263.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
<NAME> ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  507,858,478
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     83,178
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      31,970,491
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    40,895,712
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             580,807,859
<COMMON>                                    15,740,602
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  111,672,646
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         49,271,525
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             176,684,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,000,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       181,922,528
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          27,000,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             183,170,558
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              580,807,859
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  108,398,105
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         8,002,292
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  74,109,008
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  82,111,300
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     26,286,805
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           2,152,835
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              28,439,640
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    11,114,496
<NET-INCOME>                                17,325,144
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    813,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               16,512,144
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    14,740,342
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   10,892,129
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      21,340,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-1363.

#### Ramata A. Hill, Petitioner v. Fulton County, Georgia, et al.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 100,

181 L. Ed. 2d 28,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6653.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 643.
# C_2015016EN.01002404.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — ‘Vekos Trade’ AD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-403/14) (1)

(2015/C 016/40)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 395, 10.11.2014.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      23,773,742
<SECURITIES>                                10,327,352
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,887,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (29,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,275,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,626,018
<PP&E>                                      26,959,838
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,260,424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,129,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,101,091
<BONDS>                                      1,853,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,095
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,626,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,129,439
<SALES>                                     14,828,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,312,374
<CGS>                                       15,504,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,581,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,404,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             445,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,054,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,054,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,054,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        32
        
        33
        
        34
        
        35
        
        36 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        32
        
        33
        
        34
        
        35
        
        36 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.8 MB)

Tags:historypage_director

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Distribution headquarters celebrates the 241st Army birthday

/ Published June 23, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
In a ceremony held in the DLA Distribution Headquarters lobby, senior leaders, military members and civilian staff celebrated the U.S. Army’s 241st Birthday on June 14, 2016.  As one of his last official actions as commanding general, Army Brig. Gen. Richard B. Dix spoke about the significance and history, followed by presentation of several awards honoring Distribution headquarters staff.

On June 14, 1775, Congress adopted the American Continental Army, raising 10 companies of riflemen, approving an enlistment form, and appointing a committee to draft rules and regulations. The following day, George Washington was unanimously chosen as the commander of all continental forces.

With several distribution centers co-located with Army customers, DLA Distribution provides efficient, effective and best value services to Army customers. DLA Distribution Anniston, Ala., DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, Pa. and DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, are all collocated with Army, with a total of 118,000 national stock numbers, $35 billion in inventory and 690,000 lines received/issued at these collocated sites.  

DLA Distribution Anniston receives stores and issues materiel to support weapons and combat weapons systems maintenance, while DLA Distribution Corpus Christi supports helicopter repair missions. DLA Distribution Red River receives stores and distributes major end items and is the designated storage site for the Army’s Bradley Fighting Vehicle Systems, Multiple Launch Rockets Systems, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems and the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles. DLA Distribution Tobyhanna is the largest, full-service communications-electronics maintenance facility in DoD.
No. 10-6558.

#### Charles Whitlow, Petitioner v. City of Roanoke, Virginia.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1064,

178 L. Ed. 2d 878,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1058.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1067, 131 S. Ct. 650, 178 L. Ed. 2d 488, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9405.
### Exhibit 32.1

### 

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Michael Wilson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ J. Michael Wilson               
|------------------------------------
|J. Michael Wilson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|May 11, 2004
#### *Archdale, Petitioner, v. O’Danne, Respondent,*

No. 92199-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71905-0-I, July 6, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1038. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
EXHIBIT 21.1
                         --------------
                 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                 ------------------------------

The Company has the following subsidiaries, each of which is wholly
owned by the Company or by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. Indented names are subsidiaries of the company under which
they are indented.


   Clear Shield National, Inc. (California)
        Carnival Brands, Inc. (Illinois)
   Envirosonics, Inc. (California)
   Sandusky Plastics, Inc. (Delaware)
        Envirodyne Subsidiary, Inc. (Delaware)
   Sandusky Plastics of Delaware, Inc. (Delaware)
   Viskase Corporation (Pennsylvania)
        Viskase Holding Corporation (Delaware)
             Viskase Australia Limited (Delaware)
             Viskase Brasil Embalagens Ltda. (Brazil)
             Viskase de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
             Viskase S.A. (France)
                  Viskase GMBH (Germany)
                  Viskase S.p.A. (Italy)
                  Viskase Canada Inc. (Ontario)
                  Viskase Holdings Limited (United Kingdom)
                      Filmco International Limited (United Kingdom)
                      Viskase Limited (United Kingdom)
                            Viskase (U.K.) Limited (United Kingdom)
                                   Envirodyne S.A.R.L. (France)
                  Viskase ZAO (Russia)
        Viskase de Nuevo Laredo, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
        Viskase Sales Corporation (Delaware)
             Viskase Puerto Rico Corporation (Delaware)
   WSC Corp. (Delaware)
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report, included in this Form 10-K, into The Titan Corporation's
previously filed registration statements (as amended, as applicable) File
Numbers 33-4041, 33-9570, 33-12119, 33-15680, 33-37827, 33-56762, 33-65123,
33-83402, 333-07413, 333-10919, 333-10965, 333-30947, 333-57651, 333-66149,
333-47633, 333-66147, 333-67341, 333-68621, 333-90133, 333-90139 and
333-95245.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Diego, California
March 24, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with this annual report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Mark St. Pierre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: September 9, 2010
 
 
 /s/Mark St. PierreMark St. PierrePresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-7037.

#### Christopher A. Odom, Petitioner v. Stephen Ryan, et al.

562 U.S. 1144, 131 S. Ct. 915,

178 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 159.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 303.
# C_2017144EN.01006005.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/60

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-554/13) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/85)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---