alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-7043.

#### Damian Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1055, 131 S. Ct. 619,

178 L. Ed. 2d 454,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8985.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 208.
#### In the Matter of Aniyah G., a Child Alleged to Abandoned. Derik G. et al., Respondents, v Anthony T., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[61 NYS3d 888]

*537Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Llinet Rosado, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2016, which, after a consent hearing, determined that respondent father was not a consent father as defined in Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d), and that he abandoned the child as per Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supports Family Court’s determination that respondent failed to maintain substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child, and therefore was a notice only parent for the purposes of the child’s adoption by petitioners (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]). Contrary to respondent’s contention, there exists no basis to disturb the court’s finding that respondent’s unsubstantiated accounts of financial support were not credible, and, even by the respondent’s own account, his contact with the child over the years was minimal *(see Matter of Michael M. [Michael M., Sr.],*103 AD3d 423, 423 [1st Dept 2013]). As such, there was no need for the Family Court to further determine whether respondent forfeited his right to consent to the adoption under Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a) *(see Matter of Andrew Peter H.T.,*64 NY2d 1090, 1091 [1985]).

The order appealed from did not dismiss respondent’s petitions for an order providing for sibling visitation, so that issue is not before this Court on this appeal. We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
Exhibit 4.3




Exhibit 4.3


AIRGAS, INC. 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II
AMENDMENT NO. 2


WHEREAS, Airgas, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Airgas, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan II effective July 1, 2006 (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, certain changes to the Plan are necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the regulations issued thereunder; and
WHEREAS, the Company, by action of its Board of Directors, retained the right to amend the Plan under Article IX thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, effective July 1, 2008, the Plan is amended as follows:
1.    The first sentence of Section 5.3 is amended to read as follows:
“The benefits payable from any sub-Account under the Plan shall be paid in the form specified by the Participant in the applicable Distribution Election.”
2.    The last sentence of Section 5.5 is amended to read as follows:
“The amount distributed on an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be withdrawn on a pro-rata basis from such Participant’s sub-Accounts.”
TO RECORD THE ADOPTION OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer this 11th day of August, 2008.


AIRGAS, INC.
By:    /s/ Dwight T. Wilson


Title:  Senior Vice President – Human Resources
No. 09-11245.

#### Alejandro Galan Del Carmen, aka Juan Lopez Hernandez, aka Alegandro C. Gala, aka Alejandro Galan Delcarmen, aka Alejandro Galan-Del Carmen, aka Alegandio Carmen Galan, aka Juan Hernandez-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1091, 131 S. Ct. 794,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9528.

178 L. Ed. 2d 530,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*531Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 615.
No. 10-6018.

#### Aaron K. Marsh, Petitioner v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services, et al.

562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 509,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8542.

178 L. Ed. 2d 377,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
The Titan Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement Nos. 33-4041, 33-9570, 33-12119, 33-15680, 33-37827, 33-56762, 33-65123, 33-83402, 333-07413, 333-10919,
333-10965, 333-30947, 333-57651, 333-66149, 333-47633, 333-66147, 333-67341, 333-68621, 333-90133, 333-90139, 333-35102, 333-35274, 333-35274, 333-41140, 333-41138, 333-63274, 333-66980, 333-70912,
333-103751, 333-81694 and 333-85668 of The Titan Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The Titan Corporation as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, and related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of The Titan Corporation. Our report on
the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in method of accounting for goodwill.

/s/
KPMG LLP

San
Diego, California
March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 294 

To treat the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November in the same 

manner as any legal public holiday for purposes of Federal employment, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. COHEN, Mr. MOULTON, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. TED LIEU of California, 

Mr. RASKIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To treat the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November in the same manner as any legal public holiday 

for purposes of Federal employment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Election Day Holiday 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 294 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ELECTION DAY IN SAME MANNER 

2 AS LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY FOR PURPOSES 

3 OF FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT. 

4 For purposes of any law relating to Federal employ5 ment, the Tuesday next after the first Monday in Novem6 ber in 2020 and each even-numbered year thereafter shall 

7 be treated in the same manner as a legal public holiday 

8 described in section 6103 of title 5, United States Code. 

9 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TREATMENT OF 

10 DAY BY PRIVATE EMPLOYERS. 

11 It is the sense of Congress that private employers in 

12 the United States should give their employees a day off 

13 on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November 

14 in 2020 and each even-numbered year thereafter to enable 

15 the employees to cast votes in the elections held on that 

16 day. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                         ------------------------------
                                                          March  31,          March 31,
                                                             2000                1999
                                                         -----------         ----------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>
Net income (in thousands)                                       (359)               (78)
                                                          ==========         ==========


Weighted average common shares outstanding                13,122,005         11,500,081
                                                          ==========         ==========


Basic income per share                                          (.03)              (.01)
                                                          ==========         ==========


Dilutive effective of options and warrants
outstanding under treasury-stock method                           --                 --
                                                          ==========        ===========


Diluted income per share                                        (.03)              (.01)
                                                          ==========        ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2013352EN.01002001.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/20

---

Action brought on 19 September 2013 — Alpinestars Research v OHIM — Tung Cho et Wang Yu (A ASTER)

(Case T-521/13)

2013/C 352/37

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alpinestars Research Srl (Coste di Maser, Italy) (represented by: G. Dragotti and R. Valenti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kean Tung Cho (Taichung City, Taiwan); and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu (Wuci Township, Taiwan)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 July 2013 given in Case R 2309/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 July 2013 given in Case R 2309/2012-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black and white containing the verbal elements ‘A ASTER’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 7 084 395

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘A-STARS’ for goods in Classes 9, 12, 14, 18, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark No 6 181 002

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM R.H.
DONNELLEY INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          15,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,085
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,912
<PP&E>                                          65,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,222
<BONDS>                                        431,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   (210,179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,416
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,389
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   649
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,685
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
# UnitedSta tes Co urt of A ppea ls F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F C O L U M B I A C I R C U I T 

# No. 10-3017 September Term, 2011 U N I T E D 

## S T A T E S O F 

## A M E R I C A 

## ,

A P P E L L E E 

## v. J E S U S 

## RO D R I G U E Z 

## , A P P E L L A N T 

## Appeal from the United States District Court for the D istrict of Columbia (No. 1:08-c r-00344- 1)
Be fore : H E N D E R S O N 

## , Circuit Judge , and W I L L I A M S 

## and G IN S B U R G 

## , Senior Circuit Judges
.


# SEA LED OPI NI ON N OT AVA ILA BLE TO THE

PU BLIC
No. 10-7106.

#### Mindy Zied-Campbell, Petitioner v. Estelle Richman, et al.

562 U.S. 1169, 131 S. Ct. 917,

178 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 200.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Januarv 11.2012 

JAN 1 8 2012 

STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION RA's mice 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

9TH FLOOR L & C ANNEX 

40 1 CHURCH STREET 

NASHVILLE, TN 37243- 153 1 

Mrs. Gwendolyn Keys Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

US. EPA, Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center, 1 2th lo or 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Certified Mail 

#70110110000040086836 

Return Receipt Requested 

Subject: Official Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan revisions to rules 1200-03-09-.O1 Construction 

Permits and 1200-03-09-.02 Operating Pem~its. These rules are being amended to include the Federal 

requirements for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Regulations into the State Implementation Plan. 

Dear Mrs. Fleming: 

This is an oflicial submittal request for incorporation into State Implementation Plan revisions to rules 1200-03-09-.O1 

Construction Permits and 1200-03-09-.02 Operating Permits. These rules are being amended to include the Federal 

requirements for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Regulations into the State Implementation Plan. 

As required one copy is included with supporting documentation consisting of a certification of the rules as State 

effective with the Board order adopting the rule change, a Regulatory Flexibility Addendum, a Impact on Local 

Governments. Additional Infonnation Required by Joint Government Operations Committee, evidence of a public 

hearing with notices and comments, and a State effective copy of Chapter 1200-03-09 with the rules included as State 

effective. Also included is a compact disk containing the documents in Microsoft Word and a hard copy of the rules 

showing the language change indicated by the strikethrough and redline marks. 

The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved 

State Implementation Plan. 

If you need fiuther information or documentation please contact Malcolm Butler at (61 5) 532-0600. 

Sincerely, 

Barry R. Stephens, P.E. 

Technical Secretary " 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board 

Enclosures 

cc: Mr. R. Scott Davis, Branch Chief
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 7, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Androscoggin Bancorp, MHC, and Androscoggin Bancorp, Inc., both 
of Lewiston, Maine; to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 
percent of the voting shares of Androscoggin Savings Bank, Lewiston, 
Maine.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 8, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18604 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2884 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2884

 To improve the provision of health care by the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2019

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve the provision of health care by the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran's Choice Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EVALUATION OF FEE-BASIS CARE PROVIDED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate all programs of 
the Department of Veterans Affairs under which the Secretary furnishes 
hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care to determine the 
most intensively used specialized care programs of the Department and 
to ensure such programs are maintained as centers of excellence.

SEC. 3. EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF VA BUDGET AND CHOICE 
              IMPROVEMENT ACT.

    Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress an 
evaluation of the implementation by the Secretary of the VA Budget and 
Choice Improvement Act (title IV of Public Law 114-41).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Goldenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.


Dated: November 14, 2006                /s/ Richard Goldenberg
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard Goldenberg
                                        Chief Financial Officer