alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014039EN.01002101.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/21

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 December 2013 — Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell’Urbe SpA v European Commission

(Case T-579/13 R)

(Interim measures - Public services contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of security guard and reception services at the ‘European Union Houses’ in Rome and Milan - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation - Disregard of the formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell’Urbe SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: D. Dodaro and S. Cianciullo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Moro and L. Cappelletti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking the suspension of the operation of the award decision, adopted on 27 August 2013 by the Commission, relating to a public service contract concerning security guard and reception services at the ‘European Union Houses’ in Rome and Milan (Italy).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed

| 2. | The costs are reserved |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37506-37507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18461]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 285

[I.D. 070698D]


Atlantic Tuna Fisheries; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Harpoon category closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS has determined that the Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) 
Harpoon category annual quota for 1998 will be attained by July 7, 
1998. Therefore, the 1998 Harpoon category fishery will be closed 
effective at 11:30 p.m. on July 7, 1998. This action is being taken to 
prevent overharvest of the Harpoon category quota.

DATES: Effective 11:30 p.m. local time on July 7, 1998, through 
December 31, 1998.


[[Page 37507]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Scida, 978-281-9260, or Sarah 
McLaughlin, 301-713-2347.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations implemented under the authority 
of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) governing 
the harvest of BFT by persons and vessels subject to U.S. jurisdiction 
are found at 50 CFR part 285. Section 285.22 subdivides the U.S. quota 
recommended by the International Commission for the Conservation of 
Atlantic Tunas among the various domestic fishing categories.

Harpoon Category Closure

    NMFS is required, under Sec. 285.20(b)(1), to monitor the catch and 
landing statistics and, on the basis of these statistics, to project a 
date when the catch of BFT will equal the quota and publish a Federal 
Register announcement to close the applicable fishery.
    Implementing regulations for the Atlantic tuna fisheries at 
Sec. 285.22 provide for a quota of 53 mt of large medium and giant BFT 
to be harvested from the regulatory area by vessels permitted in the 
Harpoon category. Based on reported landings and effort, NMFS projects 
that this quota will be reached by July 7, 1998. Therefore, fishing 
for, retaining, possessing, or landing large medium or giant BFT by 
vessels in the Harpoon category must cease at 11:30 p.m. local time 
July 7, 1998.
    The intent of this closure is to prevent overharvest of the quota 
established for the Harpoon category.

Classification

    This action is taken under Secs. 285.20(b) and 285.22 and is exempt 
from review under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-18461 Filed 7-7-98; 4:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08

- 18

- 00122

- CV

§

SOUTHWEST REGION

CONFERENCE ASSOCIATI ON OF

SEVENTH

- DAY ADVENTIS TS,

NICHOLAS HERRERA, CA LVIN

WATKINS, STEPHEN BRO OKS,

PHILIP PALMER, SAMUE L GREEN,

TERRELL MCCOY, AND NANCY

JONES

,

RELATORS §

§

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Sergio H. Enriquez, Judge of the 448th District Court of El Paso, Texas, and

concludes that Relators’ writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for

writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46391

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

LANCE MOLYNEUX

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: April 24, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Nancy Baskin , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years with a minimum period of confinement of two years for possession of a controlled
substance, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Lance Molyneux pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance . Idaho Code § 37

-

2732(c) . The district court sentenced Molyneux to a unified term of seven years with two years

determinate

. Molyneux appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing

an excessive sentence and by declining to retain jurisdiction

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Molyneux ’s ju dgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# Columbus' Hispanic Heritage Program engages local students and professionals

/ Published Nov. 23, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under									

E.O.	13563	and	12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposed Rule, “Control of Air Pollution from 

Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards,” RIN 2060-AQ86

Primary Questions for Discussion:

1. For the estimates on the bottom of page 8-4 that decrease the benefits by 12-16% by removing 

California from the baseline, how is this estimate consistent with the benefits maps that were 

shown during the briefing in which the majority of the benefits appeared to be in California? 

2. Please reconcile the estimates of population and counties estimated to be in nonattainment 

with the PM and ozone NAAQS on pages 11, 29, 33, and 36 of the preamble. Some of these 

estimates appear to be based on the RIA modeling for this rule, some appear to be related to 

nonattainment designations. Please help us reconcile how both sets of estimates reconcile with 

the number of counties estimated to be in nonattainment at these dates when the NAAQS were 

designated. 

3. The introductory portion of Chapter 8 of the RIA mistakenly refers to the ACS based estimate for 

PM/premature morality benefits as “most conservative.” [“most conservative” appears at least 

3 times in pages 8-4 and 8-5.] Rather, the ACS and 6-Cities based estimates represent EPA’s 

preferred estimates. As indicated in the rest of the chapter, there are estimates that are both 

higher and lower than these preferred estimates. If this verbiage appears in the preamble, it 

should be fixed there as well.

4. We will send an edit to page 8-10 of the RIA, to clarify the role/purpose of the expert elicitation.

5. What is the purpose of Table 8-13 of the RIA (how it is it used?).

6. The text in chapter 6 of the RIA appears almost identical to that on pages 30-60 of the 

preamble. For brevity, consider deleting chapter 6. If keeping both, please fix this issue in both 

places: Page 48 of preamble and page 6-10 of RIA – suggest deleting 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of 

ethanol entry.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2952 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize concurrent use of 

Department of Defense Tuition Assistance and Montgomery GI BillSelected Reserve benefits, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. RYAN (for himself, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. ARMSTRONG, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize concurrent use of Department of Defense Tuition Assistance 

and Montgomery GI Bill-Selected Reserve benefits, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Montgomery GI Bill 

5 Parity Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2952 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONCURRENT USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

2 TUITION ASSISTANCE AND MONTGOMERY GI 

3 BILL-SELECTED RESERVE BENEFITS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 16131 of title 10, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(k)(1) In the case of an individual entitled to edu8 cational assistance under this chapter who is pursuing 

9 education or training described in subsection (a) or (c) of 

10 section 2007 of this title, the Secretary shall, at the elec11 tion of the individual, pay the individual an educational 

12 assistance allowance to meet all or a portion of the charges 

13 of the educational institution for the education or training 

14 that are not paid by the Secretary of the military depart15 ment concerned under such subsection. 

16 ‘‘(2)(A) The amount of the educational assistance al17 lowance payable to an individual under this subsection for 

18 a month shall be the amount of the educational assistance 

19 allowance to which the individual would be entitled for the 

20 month under subsection (b), (d), (e), or (f). 

21 ‘‘(B) The number of months of entitlement charged 

22 under this chapter in the case of an individual who has 

23 been paid an educational assistance allowance under this 

24 subsection shall be equal to the number (including any 

25 fraction) determined by dividing the total amount of such 

26 educational assistance allowance paid the individual by the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2952 IH

1 full-time monthly institutional rate of educational assist2 ance which such individual would otherwise be paid under 

3 subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of subsection (b)(1), 

4 subsection (d), subsection (e), or subsection (f), as the 

5 case may be.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2007(d) 

7 of such title is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or chapter 

9 1606 of this title’’ after ‘‘of title 38’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, in the case 

11 of educational assistance under chapter 30 of such 

12 title, and section 16131(k), in the case of edu13 cational assistance under chapter 1606 of this title’’ 

14 before the period at the end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
S16Y1601.

#### IN THE MATTER OF C. MICHAEL ROSE.

(791 SE2d 1)

Per curiam.

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of the special master,1 who recommends that attorney C. Michael Rose (State Bar No. 614173) be disbarred for his misuse of funds that he held in trust. Rose acknowledged service of the formal complaint, but he failed to file an answer as required by Bar Rule 4-212 (a), and so, the special master found Rose in default. By virtue of his default, *666Rose admitted that he agreed to close a real estate transaction in April 2014; as a part of that closing, he was entrusted with $3,549.08 by the seller and $113,162.63 by the buyer, which he deposited in separate trust accounts; he failed to promptly pay off the seller’s mortgage; he either misused the funds held in trust for the real estate transaction for the benefit of other clients or commingled those funds with his own funds; he failed to account for the funds; and although he eventually paid off the seller’s mortgage, he did so only after the seller filed a lawsuit against him, and even then, he had to deposit his own funds into his trust account to make the payment.

Decided September 12, 2016.

*Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittel-man, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

The special master concluded that, by his conduct, Rose violated Rules 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, Bar Rule 4-102 (d), the maximum sanction for which is disbarment. The special master noted that Rose has no prior disciplinary history, but he also found that the violations in this case were aggravated by Rose’s disregard of the disciplinary process. We agree with the findings of the special master, and as to mitigation, we would add that Rose failed to provide the special master (or this Court) with any mitigating explanation of his conduct. Accordingly, we agree with the special master that disbarment is appropriate. See generally *In the Matter of Wathen,*290 Ga. 438 (721 SE2d 899) (2012) (disbarring attorney for violations of several Rules, including Rules 1.15 (I), (II) and 8.4 (a) (4), where attorney converted client funds to his own use and showed indifference to making restitution, although attorney’s partners made restitution to client). Compare *In the Matter of Jones,*280 Ga. 302 (627 SE2d 24) (2006) (imposing a one-year suspension for using firm’s escrow account funds to pay promissory note for a separate business where no clients were harmed and where attorney cooperated fully, made restitution, was deeply remorseful, and had no disciplinary history).

It is hereby ordered that the name of C. Michael Rose be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Rose is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 This Court appointed William Allen Myers as special master in this case.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Dr.
      John J. McGrath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.







Dated:
        August 12, 2005
 /s/ Dr.
                John J. McGrathDr.
                  John J. McGrathChief
                  Executive Officer and
                  President
No. 10-656.

#### Patricia A. Muscarello, Petitioner v. Ogle County Board of Commissioners, et al.

562 U.S. 1200, 131 S. Ct. 1045,

178 L. Ed. 2d 865,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1038.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 416.
1 Ogulei, David

From: Paddock, Nancy <nancy.paddock@veolia.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:58 AM To: Ogulei, David Cc: Dennis Warchol Subject: Re: Greenhouse Gas numbers

Will get that to you ASAP. : )

Nancy

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax)



### Please note that my e-mail address has changed: Nancy.Paddock@Veolia.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutio ns, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privi leged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you a re not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all cop ies of the original message and delete it from all computers.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Ogulei, David < Ogulei.David@epa.gov > wrote:

Thanks Nancy. Yes, for a moment there I thought yo u had forgotten about me!

Will you also be submitting your sample calculation s for the GHG emissions? We need a record of the ca lculation procedures (just like you provided for the other re gulated pollutants).

David Ogulei

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division | A-18J

77 West Jackson Blvd. | Chicago, Illinois 606042 Phone: (312) 353-0987 | Fax: (312) 692-2080

Ogulei.David@epa.gov

From: Paddock, Nancy [mailto: nancy.paddock@veolia.com ] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:29 AM To: Ogulei, David Cc: Dennis Warchol Subject: Greenhouse Gas numbers

Hi David!

Hope you didn't think I forgot about you. : ) Att ached you will find the greenhouse gas spreadsheet. Hopefully this is what you need.

Have a great day!

Nancy

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115)

618.271.2128 (fax)



### Please note that my e-mail address has changed:

Nancy.Paddock@Veolia.com3 This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutio ns, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privi leged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you a re not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all cop ies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,969,744
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         160,654
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,377,323
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 31,189,030
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,385,047
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,427,610
<LOANS>                                     43,680,543
<ALLOWANCE>                                    498,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,597,038
<DEPOSITS>                                  74,955,560
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            784,935
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,200,000
<COMMON>                                     1,309,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,346,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              92,597,038
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,015,713
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,608,584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                71,191
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,695,489
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,032,724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,427,913
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,267,575
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              27,486
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,211,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                413,334
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     264,534
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   264,534
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.61
<LOANS-NON>                                    836,755
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,145,018
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               501,711
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   21,273
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,816
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              498,254
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           498,254
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-484

_____________________________

JACK DZIEDZIC and ELIZABETH 

DZIEDZIC,

Appellants,

v.

US BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION as Trustee 

Successor in Interest to Bank of 

America National Association as 

Trustee Successor by merger to 

Lasalle Bank National 

Association as Trustee for 

Washington Mutual Mortgage 

Pass Through Certificates 

Wmalt series 2006 AR8 Trust,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

October 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Brian K. Korte and Scott Wortman of Korte & Wortman, P.A., 

West Palm Beach, for Appellants.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. 

Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Celia C. Falzone of 

Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.