alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
% Food exposure 
% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 70th percentile  
% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg
% Cecilia Tan
% August 26, 2015

prepare @clear @all
% Setting model parameters
start @NoCallback
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;		% Set to 1 if BWT is provided
BWST=72.9;	% Initial BW in kg
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
TSTOP= 1008; 	% Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily oral exposure
DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "70p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times
DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "70p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg 
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy
start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];	%unit of conc = ug/L
save mytable @file='food_70.txt' @format=ascii
# C_2013189EN.01002502.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/25

---

Action brought on 15 April 2013 — Saf-Holland v OHIM (INTEGRAL)

(Case T-217/13)

2013/C 189/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saf-Holland GmbH (Bessenbach, Germany) (represented by M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 2087/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 2087/2011-1;

| — | Amend the contested decision in such a way that the preceding refusal decision of OHIM of 14 September 2011 is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

Amend the contested decision in such a way that the preceding refusal decision of OHIM of 14 September 2011 is annulled;

| — | In the alternative, amend the contested decision in such a way that the registration procedure is continued; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, amend the contested decision in such a way that the registration procedure is continued;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark INTEGRAL for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 9 508 466

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### *State, Respondent, v. Castillo-Murcia, Petitioner,*

No. 92024-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32168-1-III, June 25, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 539. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                       249
<INVENTORY>                                     20,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,594
<PP&E>                                          75,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,728
<BONDS>                                         20,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        442
<COMMON>                                         1,026
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,286
<SALES>                                         65,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,578
<CGS>                                           54,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    452
<INCOME-TAX>                                       430
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016243EN.01001002.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-528/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 - Article 3 - Relief from import duties - Personal property - Transfer of residence from a third country to a Member State - Definition of ‘normal place of residence’ - Impossible to have at the same time a normal place of residence in a Member State and in a third country - Criteria for determining the normal place of residence))

(2016/C 243/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty is to be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of the application of that provision, a natural person may not have at the same time a normal place of residence in both a Member State and in a third country. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty is to be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of the application of that provision, a natural person may not have at the same time a normal place of residence in both a Member State and in a third country.

| 2. | In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, where the person concerned has both personal and occupational ties in a third country and personal ties in a Member State, it is necessary, for the purpose of determining whether the normal place of residence of that person within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation No 1186/2009 is in the third country, to attach particular importance to the length of that person’s stay in the third country when carrying out an overall assessment of the relevant facts. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, where the person concerned has both personal and occupational ties in a third country and personal ties in a Member State, it is necessary, for the purpose of determining whether the normal place of residence of that person within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation No 1186/2009 is in the third country, to attach particular importance to the length of that person’s stay in the third country when carrying out an overall assessment of the relevant facts.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.

1

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 393 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2640 

[Report No. 116–491] 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from mineral 

development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Ms. HAALAND (for herself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Additional sponsor: Mr. MCNERNEY

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 9, 2019] 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2640 RH

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from 

mineral development. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2640 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buffalo Tract Protection 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the 

8 Federal land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from 

9 all forms of— 

10 (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

11 laws; and 

12 (2) disposition under the mineral leasing, min13 eral materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

14 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The Federal land referred to in 

15 subsections (a) and (c) is the approximately 4,288 acres of 

16 land administered by the Director of the Bureau of Land 

17 Management and generally depicted as ‘‘Tract A’’, ‘‘Tract 

18 B’’, ‘‘Tract C’’, and ‘‘Tract D’’ on the map entitled 

19 ‘‘Placitas, New Mexico Area Map’’ and dated November 13, 

20 2019. 

21 (c) SURFACE ESTATE.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the reservation of 

23 the mineral estate under paragraph (2), nothing in 

24 this Act prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 2640 RH

1 conveying the surface estate of the Federal land de2 scribed in subsection (b) in accordance with— 

3 (A) the Federal Land Policy and Manage4 ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); or 

5 (B) the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Purposes 

7 Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.). 

8 (2) MINERAL ESTATE.—Any conveyance of the 

9 surface estate of the Federal land described in sub10 section (b) shall require a reservation of the mineral 

11 estate to the United States. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 393 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2640 

[Report No. 116–491] 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management 

land from mineral development. 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 15, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 15, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0457. FLORI S. WATERS v. NEHEMIAH SLAUGHTER .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV10085
# C_2016156EN.01001201.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — VAD BVBA, Johannes Josephus Maria van Aert v Belgische Staat

(Case C-499/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Interpretation - General Rules - Rule 3(b) - Definition of ‘goods put up in sets for retail sale’ - Separate packages))

(2016/C 156/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: VAD BVBA, Johannes Josephus Maria van Aert

Applicants:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, must be interpreted as meaning that goods, such as those in the main proceedings, which are presented for customs clearance in separate packages and are packed together only after that transaction may nevertheless be held to be ‘goods put up in sets for retail sale’, within the meaning of that rule and may, therefore, come under a single tariff heading, where it is established, having regard to other objective factors, which it is for the national court to assess, that the goods belong together as a unit and are intended to be presented as such in the retail trade.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---
0*,f<e0$ me S4t

~ Ve

~ y Of T'Crn5D0-J`0f1 Chief- tiocumentary Services Div. Department of Transportation Washington. 

### D.C. 20590 DESIGNATION OF 

### AGENT FOR SERVICE OF 

### NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

### DECIS(ONS AND REQUIREMENTS

ATTENTION: DOCKET 

### SECTION. C-55 

## Cebu Air, Inc. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines
. having its principal (Name of Company. pleatc print) office at 

### Cebu Pacific Building, Domestic Road, Barangay 191 

### Zone 20, Pasay City 1301 

### Philippines (Address) hereby designates. pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the 

### U.S. Code (foriiierlv wetion l(XI

- iib) of (he Pederiii A%iation Act of 

### 19-58. w, aiiietided) the person rianied Motv as its Agent upoii whom service of a}l notices and proces•- ajXJ ull oWers. decisions. and requiretticiiis of the Depatinient of Trunspoiiation i

- nav he made foi - and on behalf of said caiTier. hereby canceNie all previous designations of agents made 

### by it to the DOT. Naffw of Agent 

### Charles F. Donley 

## 11; charies,donley@squirepb.com ; fax 

## 202-626-6780 (Please Print) Address 

## 1200 19th Street, NW, Suite 

# 300, Washington, 

# DC 20036 The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space:
Name (Initials) 

### - 

# elq 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 

## Cebu Air, n(c. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines has caused these (Name of Company) presents to be signed in its name 

### by 

## Lance Y. Gokongwei President (Please Print) of said company, and to 

### be attested undcr its corporate seal 

### by 

# Rosalinda F. Rivera Corporate Secretary (Secretary. or other Title) 

### on this 

### — 

## 15 -- day 

### of February 1 

### 19 2015 

## Cebu Air, Inc. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines

ATTEST: 

### Rosalinda F. Rivera, Corporate Secretary

(Secretary. or other ofricer) me r 

### cor 

### "' Oany)
000 

### ,y: 

# Lance. , T Y/o;; 2 ngwei (President)

OST 

### F 1010.5 (1-95)
**EXHIBIT.
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      Mathews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.






Dated: 
              December 19, 2007
            /s/
              Robert
              Mathews
              Robert
                Mathews
              Chief
                Financial Officer
No. 11-5554.

#### Stephen Ceslik, Petitioner v. Miller Ford, Inc.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 89,

181 L. Ed. 2d 20,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6842.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287]


Duke Power Corp. (Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3); 
Notice of Receipt of Application for Renewal of Facility Operating 
Licenses Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 for an Additional 20 Year 
Period

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received an application from 
the Duke Power Corporation dated July 6, 1998, filed pursuant to 
Section 104b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 CFR 
part 54 for renewal of operating licenses DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55, 
which authorize the applicant to operate its Oconee Nuclear Station 
(ONS) Units 1, 2, and 3. The current operating licenses for the ONS 
Units 1, 2, and 3 expire on February 6, 2013, October 6, 2013, and July 
19, 2014, respectively. The ONS Units are pressurized water reactors 
designed by Babcock and Wilcox. The ONS Units 1, 2, and 3 are located 
in Oconee County, South Carolina. The acceptability of the tendered 
application for docketing and other matters, including an opportunity 
to request a hearing, will be the subject of a subsequent Federal 
Register Notice.
    A copy of the application is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20037, and the Local Public Document Room for the ONS Units 1, 2, 
and 3 located in the Oconee County Library, 501 West South Broad 
Street, Walhalla, SC 29691.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of July 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher I. Grimes,
Director, License Renewal Project Directorate, Division of Reactor 
Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-18686 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# Schedule B12
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.O.M.  Medical  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company"),  on form 10-QSB for the period  ending  November 30, 2003,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  John  Klippenstein,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


January 14, 2004                                By:  /s/ John Klippenstein
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     John Klippenstein
                                                Its: Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-1026.

#### John Motley, Warden, Petitioner v. Samuel Arthur Yenawine.

565 U.S. 814, 132 S. Ct. 91,

181 L. Ed. 2d 21,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6622.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 997.
No. 10-5232.

#### Aquil Bond, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 567,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8713.

178 L. Ed. 2d 416,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 604 Pa. 1, 985 A.2d 810.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Three-Five Systems,
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Three-Five
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.