alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(In thousands)

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                                      |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                                      |  | 2006 |        | 2005 |   | 2004   |  | 2003 |        | 2002
|                                                      |  |      |        |      |  
|Income from continuing operations before income taxes |  | $    | 73,196 |      | $ | 67,670 |  | $    | 38,989 |      | $ | 40,605 |  | $ | 37,588
|                                                      |  |      |        |      |  
|Fixed charges1                                        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Interest expense                                      |  |      | 21,290 |      |   | 18,159 |  |      | 17,336 |      |   | 11,991 |  |   | 7,117 
|Amortization of debt issuance cost                    |  |      | 172    |      |   | 56     |  |      | 56     |      |   | 703    |  |   | 167   
|Interest included in rental expense                   |  |      | 3,505  |      |   | 3,137  |  |      | 2,894  |      |   | 2,398  |  |   | 2,164 
|                                                      |  |      |        |      |  
|Total                                                 |  |      | 24,967 |      |   | 21,352 |  |      | 20,286 |      |   | 15,092 |  |   | 9,448 
|                                                      |  |      |        |      |  
|Earnings2                                             |  | $    | 98,163 |      | $ | 89,022 |  | $    | 59,275 |      | $ | 55,697 |  | $ | 47,036
|                                                      |  |      |        |      |  
|Ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges    |  |      | 3.9    |      |   | 4.2    |  |      | 2.9    |      |   | 3.7    |  |   | 5.0   





|1 | Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt issuance cost plus that portion of lease rental expense representative of the interest
factor.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to
his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/S/ DAVID C. KAHN
-----------------------
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AUGUST 10, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                              FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                              FROM THE AUGUST 31, 2000, FORM 10-K
                              AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
                              BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     740,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       832,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,825,429
<PP&E>                                          1,787,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                    960,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,282,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,610,527
<BONDS>                                           646,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       100,000
<COMMON>                                          522,876
<OTHER-SE>                                        258,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,282,187
<SALES>                                        12,054,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,238,963
<CGS>                                          11,608,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,767,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 99,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (82,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       21,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (29,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (29,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
# C_2013178EN.01001501.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/15

---

Action brought on 17 April 2013 — Bayer Intellectual Property/OHIM — Interhygiene (INTERFACE)

(Case T-227/13)

2013/C 178/25

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Interhygiene GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision for being contrary to law insofar as it declares that the INTERFACE Community trademark application is incompatible with the earlier Interfog trademark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision for being contrary to law insofar as it declares that the INTERFACE Community trademark application is incompatible with the earlier Interfog trademark;

| — | Expressly sentence OHIM to court fees. |
| --- | --- |

—

Expressly sentence OHIM to court fees.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘INTERFACE’ for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application 8 133 977

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration of the word mark ‘Interfog’ for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  financial  statements  for the 3 months  ended May 31,  2000,  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>



<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                                    MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                      MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                327,864
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       1,663,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           60,226
<INVENTORY>                                                           290,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    2,484,397
<PP&E>                                                                421,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        241,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      2,664,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,612,169
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                               43,331
<OTHER-SE>                                                          1,008,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        2,664,338
<SALES>                                                             3,257,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    3,257,421
<CGS>                                                               3,074,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       3,074,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       18,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      5,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (183,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (183,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (183,828)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (0.04)


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 279 

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 

of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. CARBAJAL (for himself, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Ms. LOFGREN, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. SWALWELL of 

California, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. 

ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. HILL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. LEVIN of 

California, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. PANETTA, 

Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. CORREA, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. 

SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. BERA, Mr. COX of California, Mr. 

PETERS, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. PORTER, Ms. JUDY CHU of 

California, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. TED LIEU of California, and Ms. BASS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast 

of the State of California, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California Clean Coast 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 279 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN AREAS 

2 OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LO3 CATED OFF THE COAST OF CALIFORNIA. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LOCATED

9 OFF THE COAST OF CALIFORNIA.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

11 provision of this Act or any other law and except as 

12 provided in paragraph (2), beginning on the date of 

13 enactment of this subsection, the conduct of oil and 

14 gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities is pro15 hibited in areas of the outer Continental Shelf lo16 cated off the coast of the State of California. 

17 ‘‘(2) EFFECT.—Nothing in this subsection af18 fects any rights under leases issued under this Act 

19 before the date of enactment of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN REPLY
REFER TO

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
CAMERON STATION
ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22304-6100

DLMSO 01 JUN 1994
SUBJECT: Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR) Meeting
TO: Commander, U.S. Army Security Affairs Command

ATTN: AMSAC-MP/R

Director, USAMC Logistics Support Activity
ATTN: AMXLS-RSP

Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command
ATTN: Code 91Q2

Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force,
International Affairs

ATTN; SAF/IAX
Commander, HQ Air Force Materiel_ Command.

ATTN: + AFMC (LGSDS)
Commandant of the Marine Corps
ATTN: 819
Commanding General, Security Assistance Liaison Office
ATTN: 87A
General Services Administration,
Discrepancy Reports Center
ATTN: DRC-6FR
Director, Defense Logistics Agency
ATTN: MMDOI
Director, Defense Security Assistance Agency
ATTN: DSAA/COMP/FMD
Commander, Joint Logistics Systems Center
ATTN: JLSC/MMA
E44" 2)

Aisoe Coast Gad (é- Es

1. ‘The Memorandum of Meeting at Enclosure 1 is forwarded to Report
of Discrepancy (ROD) Focal Points for information.

2. Pursuant to the enclosed memorandum, I have scheduled a meeting

for 18-20 July 1994, to address the development of standard codes for
SDR initiator action and response/disposition, Proposed codes are
shown at Enclosure 2. A minimum of one individual representing each
of the Services, the Defense Logistics Agency, and the Joint Logis-
tics Systems Center is expected to attend. Additional attendees are
welcome. The meeting will be held in the Defense Logistics Manage~
ment Standards Office Conference Room (Room 205), 6301 Little River
Turnpike, Alexandria, VA 22312-3508. The meeting will begin at 1000



DLMSO PAGE 2
SUBJECT: Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR) Meeting

hours the first day. Government quarters and mess are not available
at the meeting site. If you have any questions concerning local
accommodations please contact Ms. Karen Naber, (703) 274-8016

ext. 201 (DSN 284-8016). You will be advised if JLSC’s funding is

available for this meeting.

3. I have included at Enclosure 3 the Defense Logistics Management
System (DLMS) Release 2.0 Volume 2 chapter which addresses policy and
procedures for the submission of SDRs. The development phase of the
Modernization of Defense Logistics Systems (MODELS) Program was
recently completed. DLMS Release 2.0 has been released to the
Services/Agencies for implementation planning (see Enclosure 4).

4, The point of contact for this letter is Ms. Ellen Hilert, DoD
ROD Administrator, (703) 274-4701, ext. 407 (DSN 284-4701). Compo~
nent representatives are requested to contact Ms. Hilert or Ms. Naber
by 6 July 1994 to confirm their attendance.

Lute (Come
4 Encl HORACE E, PERDIEU

Director, Defense Logistics
Management Standards Office

cc:
SIMA/AMXSI-CHC (DRS PMO)
No. 10-6353.

#### Vonne I. Torrez, Petitioner v. Clifford E. Eley.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 859,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 670.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 600, 178 L. Ed. 2d 439, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8823.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37553-37554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-313-000]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of 
August 1, 1998:
First Revised Sheet No. 202
First Revised Sheet No. 203
First Revised Sheet No. 211
    Mojave states that the filing is being made in compliance with 
Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998 at Docket No. RM96-1-007.
    Mojave states that the tariff sheets are being filed to implement 
Version 1.2 of the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) Standards 
accepted by the Commission in Order No. 587-G.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests

[[Page 37554]]

will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18502 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-303-000]


Caprock Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Caprock Pipeline Company 
(Caprock) tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 29A, to be 
effective August 1, 1998.
    Caprock states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commissioner's Order issued on April 16, 1998, in Docket No. RM96-1-
007.
    Caprock states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest the filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18353 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 Kelly, Shaheerah

From: R9AirPermits Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 4:33 PM To: 'buzzbn@yahoo.com' Cc: R9AirPermits Subject: McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility Final PSD Permit Decision

Dear Mr. Ryan Bean,

You are receiving this letter for one of the following reasons:

1) You provided timely written comments or oral testim ony to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the proposed Clean Air Act Prev ention of Significant Dete rioration (PSD) permit amendment for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Producti on Facility (MCU Facility ), an existing oil and gas production operation that is ow ned, in partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and operated by the Resolute Natural Re sources Company (Resolute); or

2) You requested notice of th e final permit decision.

The final PSD permit amendment, our responses to public comments, and other key do cuments relevant to the final permit are also available through a link at our website, http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/preventionsignificant-deterioration-ps d-permits-issued-region-9 , or at http://www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09- OAR-2014-0785). If you would like to receive a hardcopy of the final permit decision, which includes the final PSD permit amendment and our respons es to public comments, and our notice announcing the final permit decision, please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov

. In accordance with 40 CFR 124.15, this permit will become effective thirty (30) days after the EPA has provided notice of the final decisi on, unless the permit is timely appeal ed. Pursuant to 40 CFR 124.19, any person who commented on the proposed permit or particip ated in the public hearing on the proposed permit may appeal the decision and permit conditions to the E nvironmental Appeals Board (EAB) within 30 days after the EPA has provided notice of the final permit decision. Any person who failed to file comments or failed to participate in the public hearing on the proposed PSD permit revision may f ile an appeal with the EAB only regarding changes from the proposed to the final permit decision.

If you have any questions about this final action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov

. Thank you.

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579