alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Jack L. Saltich, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Three-Five Systems,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004     /s/ Jack L. SaltichJack L. Saltich President and Chief Executive Officer
# . . R eco rd of Di scuss i on Docket No. FA A- Directorate Identifier: - AD

With whom outside the F AA h as this AD ac tion been di sc u ssed (i.e., D es ign Approval Holder , m a nuf ac tu rer, ATA, NBAA, RAA , AOPA , ALPA, GAMA, et c) ? ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Air lines For America Mr. Bob Ireland



### ~t'ZJ{It~ **~~** (A4A) '5t4fi 01-:::

Other /Addit iona l Information:
For accessible content (in English): https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/resources/ads/pdf-print-ads/cdc-tips-excision-korean-english-508.pdf
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2969 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2969

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, as the ``Althea 
              Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, as the ``Althea 
              Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTHEA MARGARET DAILY MILLS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Althea Margaret Daily Mills Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Althea 
Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Adrian Ma, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emerson Radio Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information: andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  June 29, 2007 /s/ Adrian Ma   Adrian Ma   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to EmersonRadio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
west virainia dewadment of environmental ~rotection 

Executive Office 

601 57'h Street SE 

Charleston, WV 25304 

Phone: (304) 926-0440 

Fax: (304) 926-0446 

September 9,2008 

Joe Manchin 111, Governor 

Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary 

www.wvdep.org 

Mr. Donald S. Welsh 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region I11 (3RA00) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19 103-2029 

Re: 

Dear Administrator Welsh: 

Final Parkersburg, West Virginia State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) Pursuant to the Federal 

Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule 

(40 CFR 5 1, Subpart Z) 

In a letter dated June 13, 2008, this agency submitted a proposed revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State of West Virginia to meet its obligations under the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) and the Federal Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule, for the Parkersburg 

PM2.5 nonattainrnent area (annual standard). The proposed submittal expressly addressed the 

pertinent requirements of the CAA, Part D and the associated requirements of the Fine Particle 

Implementation Rule beginning at 40 CFR 51.1000. We have now completed the public 

participation process and are herein submitting the final SIP. We certify that the public hearing 

required by 40 CFR 951.102(a) was held in accordance with the applicable state laws and the 

requirements of 40 CFR 95 1.102(d). 

The State of West Virginia requests that the EPA approve this Parkersburg attainment 

demonstration, with a projected attainment date of April 2010, as a revision to the SIP. If you 

have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information, please contact 

John A. Benedict, Director of the Division of Air Quality, at (304) 926-0462. 

Sincerely, 

Ly% Randy C. Huffinan 

Enclosure 

cc: Judith Katz, EPA 

John A. Benedict, DEP 

Cabinet Secretary 

Promoting a healthy environment.
No. 10-5439.

#### Patrick Franklin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 299,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7536.

178 L. Ed. 2d 195,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 367.
NO ONE

CHOOSES

TO TAKE UP

SECONDHAND

SMOKING.

Nathan, Age 54

Oglala Sioux

Idaho

Secondhand smoke at work triggered Nathan’s severe asthma

attacks and caused infections and lung damage. If you or someone 

you know wants free help to quit smoking, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6787

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus
FAHED T. TAWALBEH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:97-cr-00024-sgw-0) Submitted: September 21, 2007 Decided: November 19, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fahed T. Tawalbeh, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Fahed T. Tawalbeh appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) . In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies, citing United States v. Petty , 82 F.3d 809, 810 (8th Cir. 1996), and United States v. Ono , 72 F.3d 101, 102-03 (9th Cir. 1995)). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. United States v. Raynor , 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 1991). When a criminal defendant’s notice of appeal is filed more than ten days following judgment but within the thirty-day extension period, this court generally remands to the district court for the limited determination of whether there has been good cause or excusable neglect to excuse the late filing. Alternatively, this court may assess on its own whether excusable neglect or good cause exists for a defendant’s delay in noting his appeal. See Reyes , 759 F.2d at 354.- 3 - The district court entered its order denying Tawalbeh’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on April 30, 2007. The ten-day appeal period expired on May 14, 2007. SeeFed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2) (providing “intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays” are excluded when time period is less than eleven days). The excusable neglect period expired on May 30, 2007. SeeFed. R. App. P. 26(a)(3). Tawalbeh’s notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period. We find good cause to excuse the delayed filing apparent from the record and we, therefore, reach the merits of the appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s denial of Tawalbeh’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tawalbeh , No. 7:97-cr-00024-sgw-0 (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-7217.

#### Donald E. Dawson, Petitioner v. John Marshall, Warden.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 926,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 444.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
A17A1004.

#### TURNER et al. v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2007-4.

(803 SE2d 797)

Self, Judge.

This appeal arises from a suit on a promissory note and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the lender. On appeal, the appellants, Bianca and Wilbur Turner, assert that the trial court erred because (1) the record failed to establish a valid assignment of the note to the appellee, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4, and (2) an affidavit from Bianca Turner shows that she was not properly served with the summons and complaint. We cannot reach the merits of these claims, however, because the record before us does not include documents critical to the appeal.

The notice of appeal in this case states that only certain listed items will be included in the record, and that all other documents, which are not identified, should be excluded. This is exactly opposite the manner prescribed for a notice of appeal by OCGA § 5-6-37 (notices of appeal shall include “a designation of those portions of the record to be omitted from the record on appeal”). Consequently, the record before us is missing documents critical to appellate review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment: the affidavit of Bianca Turner stating where she resided at the time of the allegedly defective service; the return of service for the complaint; and an affidavit from a records custodian regarding the assignment of the loan.

> Georgia’s appellate courts have made clear that where the record is incomplete as the result of an appellant’s failure to comply with the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-37, the order of the trial court will be affirmed. An affirmance is required under such circumstances because on appeal the burden is on the appellant, as the party alleging error, to show affirmatively from the record that such error occurred. When the appellant fails to meet that burden, we have no choice but to assume that the judgment complained of is correct and to therefore affirm the same.

(Citations omitted.) *Curry v. Miller,*328 Ga. App. 564, 565 (763 SE2d 489) (2014). In accordance with this well established law, we too must assume that the record supports the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the lender and affirm.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Dillard, C. J., and Ray, R J., concur.*

*836Decided August 10, 2017

Reconsideration denied September 20, 2017.

*Kunle Ogundele,*for appellants.

*Roosen Varchetti & Olivier, Brannon W. Carson,*for appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-K
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT Jurisdiction of
    
    Percentage ofName of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipEmerson Radio (Hong Kong) Limited.
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    100.0
    %*Emerson Radio International Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100.0
    %Sport Supply Group, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    53.2
    %
 * One share is owned by a resident director, pursuant to local law.
#### *Mendoza de Sugiyama, Petitioner, v. State, Respondent,*

No. 91735-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45087-9-II, February 10, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1051. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-616.

#### Thomas John Salzano, Petitioner v. North Jersey Media Group, Inc., dba The Record, et al.

562 U.S. 1200, 131 S. Ct. 1045,

178 L. Ed. 2d 864,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1042.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.

Same case below, 201 N.J. 500, 993 A.2d 778.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-40549

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Armando Bazan, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15-CR-975-1

______________________________ Before Elrod, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Armando Bazan, federal prisoner # 64509-079, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). In order to proceed IFP, Bazan must show that he is a pauper and that he will raise a no nfrivolous appellate issue. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 9, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40549 Document: 00516603483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023No. 22-40549

2 A review of Bazan’s financial documentation reveals that he is not financially eligible for IFP status. See Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948). Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED . Bazan is ORDERED to pay the clerk of the district court the full appellate filing fee of $505 within 30 days of the date of this order. The clerk of this court shall dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution if Bazan does no t comply with this order. Case: 22-40549 Document: 00516603483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2023
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2589-000]


W.M. Lord Excelsior (Union Village Dam); Notice of Withdrawal

June 25, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 22, 1998, W.M. Lord Excelsior tendered for 
filing Notice of Withdrawal of its filing made on April 17, 1998, in 
Docket No ER98-2589-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 216 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.216). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before July 7, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17497 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-78-000]


Gulf States Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 7, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (Gulf States), tendered for filing the revised tariff 
sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing. Gulf States proposes that 
the foregoing tariff sheets be made effective on August 1, 1998.
    Gulf States states this filing is made to reflect ministerial 
tariff changes resulting from the recent acquisition of Gulf States by 
El Paso Energy Corporation. Gulf States further states that the instant 
filing specifically modifies the company's address, telephone numbers 
and personnel titles and designations from its currently effective 
tariff to conform with the changes due to the purchase by El Paso 
Energy. Gulf States further states that the changes effected by this 
filing are purely ministerial and have no substantive effect on Gulf 
States' tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18498 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# BACT Clearinghouse Search Results

7 matching record(s) found District - All Districts Category - Heater-Other Process Pollutant - NOx Capacity / Dimension Pollutant District Name District Contact Plant Name

35 MMBtu/hr 20 Santa Barbara County APCD Mike Goldman Celite View Determination

48 MMBtu/hr 20 Santa Barbara County APCD Mike Goldman Celite View Determination

50 MMBtu/hr 73 Santa Barbara County APCD Mike Goldman Celite View Determination

6.5 mmbtu/hr 20 South Coast AQMD Martin Kay Southern California Gas Co View Determination

19 MMBtu/hr 12 South Coast AQMD Martin Kay NELCO Products. Inc, View Determination

117.6 MMBtu/hr 50 South Coast AQMD Martin Kay Praxair View Determination

5 South Coast AQMD Martin Kay Chevron Products Co. View Determination 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 Report Results

11/30/2009 htt p ://www.arb.ca. g ov/bact/bactnew/ q uer y . p h p