alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 294 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 294

  To treat the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November in the 
    same manner as any legal public holiday for purposes of Federal 
                  employment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

Ms. Eshoo (for herself, Mr. McEachin, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Hastings, Mrs. 
Napolitano, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Norton, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Lujan, 
 Ms. Clarke of New York, Mrs. Beatty, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. 
  Khanna, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. 
Brown of Maryland, and Mr. Carson of Indiana) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To treat the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November in the 
    same manner as any legal public holiday for purposes of Federal 
                  employment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Election Day Holiday Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ELECTION DAY IN SAME MANNER AS LEGAL PUBLIC 
              HOLIDAY FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT.

    For purposes of any law relating to Federal employment, the Tuesday 
next after the first Monday in November in 2020 and each even-numbered 
year thereafter shall be treated in the same manner as a legal public 
holiday described in section 6103 of title 5, United States Code.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TREATMENT OF DAY BY PRIVATE 
              EMPLOYERS.

    It is the sense of Congress that private employers in the United 
States should give their employees a day off on the Tuesday next after 
the first Monday in November in 2020 and each even-numbered year 
thereafter to enable the employees to cast votes in the elections held 
on that day.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015213EN.01002204.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Stephan Naumann v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-612/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 213/41)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3133

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit gay and trans panic 
                               defenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2019

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Higgins 
    of New York, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Kelly of 
   Illinois, Mr. Peters, Ms. Speier, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. 
 Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Ms. Norton, 
 Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. 
 Lee of California, Mr. Cox of California, Ms. Haaland, Ms. Moore, Mr. 
 Soto, Mr. Pappas, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Crist, Mrs. Torres of California, 
and Mr. Cardenas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit gay and trans panic 
                               defenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gay and Trans Panic Defense 
Prohibition Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON GAY AND TRANS PANIC DEFENSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 28. Prohibition on gay and trans panic defenses
    ``(a) Prohibition.--No nonviolent sexual advance or perception or 
belief, even if inaccurate, of the gender, gender identity or 
expression, or sexual orientation of an individual may be used to 
excuse or justify the conduct of an individual or mitigate the severity 
of an offense.
    ``(b) Past Trauma.--Notwithstanding the prohibition in subsection 
(a), a court may admit evidence, in accordance with the Federal Rules 
of Evidence, of prior trauma to the defendant for the purpose of 
excusing or justifying the conduct of the defendant or mitigating the 
severity of an offense.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``28. Prohibition on gay and trans panic defenses.''.
    (c) Report.--The Attorney General shall submit to Congress an 
annual report that details prosecutions in Federal court involving 
capital and noncapital crimes committed against lesbian, gay, bisexual, 
or transgender individuals that were motivated by the victim's gender, 
gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Dr. John J. McGrath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated.


Dated: May 11, 2004                          /s/ Dr. John J. McGrath
                                             -----------------------
                                             Dr. John J. McGrath
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             President
EXHIBIT 23.1
                              Accountant's Consent



The Board of Directors
EIS International, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of EIS
International, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 33-59754, 33-72392, and 333-2998) and Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-3350 and 333-5823) of our report dated January 28, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of EIS International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997,
which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of EIS
International, Inc.


                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 27, 1998
No. 10-1283.

#### Ellen Garman, Guardian and Next Friend of Apryl Garman, Petitioner v. Campbell County School District No. 1, et al.

565 U.S. 816, 132 S. Ct. 95,

181 L. Ed. 2d 24,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6701.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 977.
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
      the period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard A.
      Pomije, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Section 135)), that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.







Date:
      ________________________





/s/  Richard
      A.
      Pomije


Richard
      A. Pomije


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer


































---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38156-38157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18791]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-80-000]


Boundary Gas, Inc.; Notice of GRI Refund Report

July 9, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 6, 1998, Boundary Gas, Inc. (Boundary) 
tendered for filing a refund report reflecting the flowthrough of the 
Gas Research Institute (GRI) refund received by Boundary on May 29, 
1998.
    Boundary states that it has calculated refunds proportionally for 
its firm customers of non-discounted service based on the GRI 
surcharges those customers paid during calendar year 1997. Boundary 
states that it mailed each customer a check for its portion of the 
refund on or about July 2, 1998.
    Boundary also states that copies of this filing were served upon 
each of Boundary's affected customers and the state commissions of New 
York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode 
Island.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 16, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies

[[Page 38157]]

of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18791 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                              THE BANC CORPORATION
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: November 9, 2004                         /s/ James A. Taylor
                                                ---------------------------
                                                    James A. Taylor
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019082EN.01002301.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Comune di Milano v Commission

(Case T-167/13) (1)

((State aid - Ground-handling services - Capital injections provided by SEA in favour of SEA Handling - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of aid - Imputability to the State - Private investor test - Principle of the right to be heard - Rights of the defence - Right to good administration - Legitimate expectations))

(2019/C 82/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Comune di Milano (Italy) (represented by: S. Grassani and A. Franchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1225 of 19 December 2012 regarding injections of capital by SEA SpA into SEA Handling SpA [SA.21420 (C 14/10) (ex NN 25/10) (ex CP 175/06)] (OJ 2015 L 201, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Comune di Milano to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Comune di Milano to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

---
No. 10-10467.

#### Darnell Lee Delk, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5977.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Morton L.
Certilman
  90
Merrick Avenue
  Ninth
Floor
  East
Meadow, NY 11554
  (516)
296-7000
  
 
 
 November
1, 2004
 
 
 Mr. Barry
Goldstein
 President
& CEO
 DCAP
Group, Inc.
 1158
Broadway
 Hewlett,
NY 11557
 
 Dear
Barry:
 
 This
letter will acknowledge my Agreement to act as a Consultant for DCAP Group, Inc.
For the period commencing November 1, 2004 and terminating October 31, 2005 at a
fee of $59,880, payable in equal monthly payments of $4,990, commencing upon the
signing of this Agreement.
  The
amount of time that I will devote to this consulting contract will be dependent
upon the requests made of me by DCAP Group Inc. under this Agreement, but in no
event shall exceed five (5) days per month.
  If this
is your understanding of our arrangement, please indicate such by signing the
copy of this Letter Agreement.
  
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/
Morton L. Certilman
 
 Morton L.
Certilman
 
 MLC/gew
 
 Accepted
and Agreed to
 DCAP
Group Inc.
 
 By:
/s/ Barry Goldstein
 Barry Goldstein, President & CEO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133916 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan GWANJUN KIM and KEESOO KIM, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133916 COA: 277362 Kent CC: 07-000187-CZ RONALD WERNETTE, JR., and BON GOU LEE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
No. 10-7545.

#### Michael Anderson, Petitioner v. Brian Coleman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 948,

178 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 253.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                     
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  589,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    745,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,428,568
<PP&E>                                       1,585,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 802,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,645,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,186,357
<BONDS>                                        580,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         72
<COMMON>                                       442,012
<OTHER-SE>                                     379,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,645,312
<SALES>                                      9,013,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,147,507
<CGS>                                        8,489,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,580,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                122,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            135,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18863]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CO-001-0024b; FRL-6124-5]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Colorado; 1993 Periodic Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories for 
Colorado

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision submitted by the Governor of the State of Colorado on 
September 16, 1997. The revision contains the 1993 periodic carbon 
monoxide (CO) emission inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort 
Collins, and Longmont that were submitted to satisfy the requirements 
of section 187(a)(5) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990. In 
the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the 
State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial SIP revision and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this rule. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 14, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to Richard R. Long, Director, 
Air Program, Mailcode 8P2-A, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 
Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202. Copies 
of the documents relevant to this action are available for public 
inspection during normal business hours at the Air Program, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 
500, Denver, Colorado 80202. Copies of the State documents relevant to 
this action are available for public inspection at the Colorado 
Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control 
Division, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80246-1530.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Rosenberg, EPA, Region VIII, 
(303) 312-6436.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations Section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: July 6, 1998.
Patricia D. Hull,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 98-18863 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M