alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10M64.

#### Paul Messer and Dorothy Calabrese, Petitioners v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

562 U.S. 1175, 131 S. Ct. 1035,

178 L. Ed. 2d 823,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 744.

January 18, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
# NO. TTiT'. qrff

IN THE INTEREST OF

CHILDREN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

### § 304'"JUDICIALDISTRICT § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER OF APPOINTMENT FOR PARENT UNDER TITLE II TO: FAX NO: TELEPHONE NO: EMAIL: 

### On this day,, the Court made an initial determination of indigence for 

# Q. ".-JT and finds that the parent of the subject child(rcn)is indigent. 

### Pursuant to Texas Family Code you are hereby appointed to represent the parent of the child(ren)who is indigent. 

### You are hereby ORDERED to make contact with your client within twenty-four hours from today to complete the attached indigence form and shall file the completed form along with responsive pleadings with the court within seventy-two hours from today. Such appointment continues until released by the Court. Such appointment concludes upon entry of a final order. The next hearing in scheduled for for a hearing. 

# Signed the<2^ of ,2017.
JUDGE

DA: 1500S58 JOAATTY ORDER - APPOINT ATTORNEY 130S124 FILED

17-0477 6/16/2017 12:11:38 PM tex-17667517 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
No. 10-641.

#### Kristina Powers, Petitioner v. James Freihammer, et ux., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children.

562 U.S. 1139, 131 S. Ct. 944,

178 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 537.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2695 

AN ACT 

To rename the Success Dam in Tulare County, California, 

as the Richard L. Schafer Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2695 EH

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF DAM. 

2 (a) RENAMING.—The Success Dam in Tulare Coun3 ty, California, shall hereafter be known and designated as 

4 the ‘‘Richard L. Schafer Dam’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula6 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

8 considered to be a reference to the Richard L. Schafer 

9 Dam. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2695 

AN ACT 

To rename the Success Dam in Tulare County, 

California, as the Richard L. Schafer Dam.
Exhibit
23.1




Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Escalade, Incorporated (Company) on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475,
333-52477, 333-142756 and 333-142757) of our report dated March 5, 2010, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December
26, 2009 and December 27, 2008, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 26, 2009, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.




/s/ BKD, LLP





BKD,
LLP


Evansville,
Indiana


March 5,
2010
# C_2013377EN.01001501.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Efag Trade Mark Company v OHIM (FICKEN)

(Case T-52/13) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark FICKEN - Absolute ground for refusal - Mark contrary to public order and good morals - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 377/34

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG (Schemmerhofen, Germany) (represented by: M. Wekwerth, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 October 2012 (Case R 493/2012-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign FICKEN as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 31, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Marfa Bancshares, Inc., Marfa, Texas, and Marfa Delaware 
Bancshares, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to become bank holding 
companies by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The Marfa 
National Bank, Marfa, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 1, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17945 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# C_2015429EN.01000301.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2015 — European Commission v ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias

(Case C-78/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Contracts relating to EU financial support granted to the Perform and Oasis projects) - Irregularities identified during audits of other projects - Decision of the Commission to suspend reimbursement of the amounts advanced by the recipient - Eligible costs - Distortions of the documents on the file))

(2015/C 429/03)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, B. Conte and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.   Elk Corporation of Dallas, a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
     outstanding stock of (a) Elk Corporation of America, a Nevada corporation,
     (b) Elk Corporation of Alabama, a Delaware corporation, (c) Elk Corporation
     of Texas, a Nevada corporation, and (d) Elk Corporation of Arkansas, an
     Arkansas corporation.

2.   Cybershield, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
     outstanding stock of (a) Cybershield of Georgia, Inc. (formerly YDK
     America, Inc.), a Georgia corporation, (b) Cybershield of Texas, Inc., a
     Delaware corporation, and (c) Cybershield International, Inc., a Delaware
     corporation.

3.   Elcor Management Corporation, a Nevada corporation.

4.   NELPA, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

5.   Elcor Service Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership.

6.   Chromium Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

7.   OEL, LTD, d/b/a Ortloff Engineers, LTD, a Nevada corporation.

8.   Ortloff de Venezuela, S.A., a Republic of Venezuela corporation.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00506

- CR

ANTONIO SERDA
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 198th Judicial District Court of Bandera County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR17

- 186

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
February 25, 2021
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Kennedy, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking Systems, Inc.








Date: August 5, 2010
/s/John KennedyJohn KennedyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-403.

#### Kathleen R. Wright, fka Kathleen R. Sanger, Petitioner v. Joy Brown, Personal Representative of the Estate of Edwin E. Sanger, Deceased.

562 U.S. 1063, 131 S. Ct. 654,

178 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9433.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Louis F. Savelli (Chief Executive Officer) and George E. Kazantzis, (President and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 9th day of November 2007.

/s/     Louis F. Savelli    Name: Louis F. Savelli    Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)

/s/     George E. Kazantzis

Name: George E. Kazantzis    Title: President (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 10-393.

#### Daniel R. Baird, Petitioner v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 983,

178 L. Ed. 2d 811,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 432.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 576, 178 L. Ed. 2d 415, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8740.
**A E5**  MODEL 1900D AIRLINER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION MANUAL 

## LIST OF EFFECTIVE REVISIONS

**PART NUMBER DATE**  **CHAPTERS AFFECTED** 129-590000-65E Nov 1/07 All (Reissue) 129-590000-65E1 Nov 1/08 Intro, 20, H Check 129-590000-65E2 May 1/09 Intro, 20 129-590000-65E3 May 1, 2010 Introduction, 20 129-590000-65E4 October 1, 2012 Introduction, 20, D1 Check 129-590000-65E5 May 1, 2013 I Check**E5 Page 1**  **May 1/13** 

# LOEP MODEL 1900D AIRLINER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION MANUAL 

## Manual Sections

**SECTION PAGE** **DATE** LOEP 1 May 1/13 CONTENTS1 thru 4 Oct 1/12 20-00-00 1 thru 47 Oct 1/12 “A” Check 1 thru 34 Nov 1/07 “B” Check 1 thru 19 Nov 1/07 “C” Check 1 thru 14 Nov 1/07 “D” Check 1 thru 33 Nov 1/07 “D1” Check 1 thru 8 Oct 1/12 “E” Check 1 thru 20 Nov 1/07 “F” Check 1 thru 9 Nov 1/07 “G” Check 1 thru 9 Nov 1/07 “H” Check 1 thru 4 Nov 1/08 “I” Check 1 thru 14 May 1/13 “A” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “B” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “C” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “D” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “D1” Check Report 1 Oct 1/12 “E” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “F” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “G” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “H” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07 “I” Check Report 1 Nov 1/07B**E5** MODEL 1900D AIRLINER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION MANUAL 

## List of Effective Pages

**Section PAGE** **DATE** Title Page May 1/13 Logo Page “A” Page E5 “B” Page E5 INTRODUCTION 1 thru 22 Oct 1/12
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-37692) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8
and S-3 (No. 333-17295) of Electro Rent Corporation of our report dated August
5, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electro Rent
Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2002.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 28, 2002



             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE



        Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the
basic 2002 financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental schedule of
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts on page 10 of the Form 10-K is presented for
the purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic 2002
financial statements. This supplemental schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Such 2002 schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in our audit of the basic 2002 financial statements and, in
our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects when considered in
relation to the basic 2002 financial statements taken as a whole. The 2001 and
2000 schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts was subjected to auditing
procedures by other auditors whose report dated August 6, 2001, stated that such
information is fairly stated in all material respects when considered in
relation to the basic 2001 and 2000 financial statements taken as a whole.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 5, 2002


                                 Exhibit 23(A)
No. 10-6293.

#### Latanya McCaslin, Petitioner v. Birmingham Museum of Art, et al.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 571,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8694,

178 L. Ed. 2d 418,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 871.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Hager, Petitioner,*

No. 91822-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70947-0-1, March 2, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1009. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS 

 * OF MARYLAND 

 Petitioner * 

 * 

v. * Misc. Docket AG 

 * No. 23 

BARRY JOHN NACE * September Term, 2014 

 * 

Respondent * 

 

*************************************** 

ORDER 

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing, under Rule 16-773, of a 

Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of a mandate entered 

October 25, 2013 and opinion filed March 28, 2013 whereby the Supreme Court of Appeals of 

West Virginia ordered the suspension of the Respondent from practicing law in West Virginia 

for a period of 120 days, commencing on October 25, 2013; and 

WHEREAS, this Court having issued a show cause order requesting the parties to show 

cause, in writing, why corresponding discipline should not be imposed by this Court and 

responses having been filed thereto by Bar Counsel and Respondent, it is this 28th day of 

August, 2014 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, 

that Barry John Nace be, and he is hereby, suspended from the practice of law in the State of 

Maryland for a period of 120 days, commencing nunc pro tunc on October 25, 2013, the date the 

Respondent was suspended by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, and ending on 

February 22, 2014, and it is further 
ORDERED, that the period of suspension having expired and Respondent having, under 

oath, swore that he did not practice law in Maryland during this period, Respondent is hereby 

reinstated to the Bar of Maryland, nunc pro tunc, as of February 22, 2014, and it is further 

ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 16-723 (e), the Clerk of this Court shall notify the required 

authorities of said sanction of Respondent. 

 

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Emerson Radio Corp., (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), Geoffrey P. Jurick, Chief Executive
Officer, and Kenneth A. Corby, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented. Dated: June 28, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Geoffrey P. JurickGeoffrey P. JurickChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Kenneth A. CorbyExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and
will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.2





Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Escalade, Incorporated on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475, 333-52477, 333-142756 and 333-142757) of our report dated March 1, 2011, on our audit of the financial statements of Martin Yale International GmbH as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.





/s/ FALK GmbH & Co KGWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftSteuerberatungsgesellschaft





Heidelberg/Germany,


June 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Amendment #1 to the Quarterly Report of Falcon Ridge
Development Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report'), Karen Duran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                     /s/ Karen Y. Duran
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                     Karen Y. Duran, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 22, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL LINDSAY and JUNE M. COLE , Appellant,

v.

GRAND ISLE AT WYNDHAM LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 511

[ June 24, 2021 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Louis H. Schiff , Judge; L.T. Case No. CONO16

- 7092, CACE18

- 25712

.
Michael Lindsay and June M. Cole, Coral Springs, pro se.

Philip J. Croyle of Philip J. Croyl e, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , F ORST , and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Partners of TEPPCO Partners, L.P.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-146483-03, 333-108416, 333-103515 and 333-85486) of DukeEnergy Carolinas, LLC of our report dated February 28, 2006, except for the effects of discontinued operations, as discussed in Note 5, which is as of June 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TEPPCO Partners,L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2005, which appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC. 

Our report dated February 28,2006, except for the effects of discontinued operations, as discussed in Note 5, which is as of June 1, 2006, contains a separate paragraph that states that as discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership hasrestated its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 13, 2008