alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                               /s/   JAMES M. SMITH
                                             __________________________________
                                             James M. Smith
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             March 5, 2004

                                               /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
                                             __________________________________
                                             Frederic B. Bassett
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             March 5, 2004
##### 



<Date>




---



##### 



It is important to stress that you MUST acknowledge and accept this restricted stock award with
Fidelity Investments Stock Plan Services Group by <Date> (within 45 days of the grant date)
to avoid cancellation of your award.
  Sincerely,
DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATIONJames P. Regan
Chairman, President and CEO 2




---



##### 



<Date>




---



##### 



It is important to stress that you MUST acknowledge and accept this restricted stock award with
Fidelity Investments Stock Plan Services Group by <Date> (within 45 days of the grant date)
to avoid cancellation of your award.
  Sincerely,
DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATIONJames P. Regan
Chairman, President and CEO 2
Insurance

|1. | The Board shall  periodically  review  insurance  coverage of the  Association.  The  President/CEO  shall
         report to the Board annually on such insurance coverage.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Directors shall be provided life insurance coverage according to the following terms:
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|a) | Upon being elected by the voting  membership  to a first term of office,  a
     Split  Dollar  Life  Insurance  Program  will  be  provided  with  Farmland
     Industries owning the policy and paying the premiums.  The  directors
     beneficiary(s)  will receive  $100,000 in benefits if death occurs during a
     term of  office  as a  director  and  $50,000  if  death  occurs  following
     retirement from the Board.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b) | Each director will be eligible for a supplemental life insurance benefit upon
commencement of a second-elected term of office. While serving as a director, a
policy with a benefit of $100,000 will be owned by the director and collaterally
assigned to Farmland with Farmland paying the premiums. Farmland shall pay the
premiums for the greater of ten years or the length of the directors term.
Upon retirement from the Board or the ten-year Farmland obligation period, the
director will have the following options:
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- continue  paying  the  full  premium  and  continue  $100,000  in
                      coverage
- reduce  the  benefit  and  premium
- elect to take a reduced paid-up policy
- surrender the policy for cash
Eschar-associated Rickettsioses 

NCEZID - National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

What is an eschar?

An eschar is a lesion that occurs at the site of a tick or mite bite. The eschar forms within a few days 

(median 5 days) after the bite, and may take several weeks to heal completely. Early eschars can look 

like small vesicles or like an erythematous plaque (Figure 1A). Eventually, most eschars will develop 

into a central, 0.5–3.0 cm ulcer. This ulcer is covered by a brown-black crust and typically is surrounded by an annular red halo (Figure 1B). The healed lesion typically appears as a small depressed scar 

(Figure 1C).

Eschars are an important and early clinical feature of some rickettsial diseases.

A

Early stages of eschar

B

Classic eschar 

C 

Healed eschar 

Which rickettsial diseases are commonly associated with 

an eschar?

In the United States:

• Rickettsia parkeri rickettsiosis, caused by

Rickettsia parkeri

• Pacific Coast tick fever, caused by Rickettsia

species 364D

• Rickettsialpox, caused by Rickettsia akari

Imported rickettsial diseases:

• African tick bite fever, caused by Rickettsia

africae

• Mediterranean spotted fever, caused by

Rickettsia conorii

• Scrub typhus, caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi

CS294259 June 29, 2018
Use eschars as a diagnostic sample: 

• Eschars can contain large amounts of rickettsial DNA.

• PCR of eschar biopsies or vigorous swabs of eschar

areas may provide confirmatory evidence in the early

stages of the disease, often before seroconversion

has occurred.

• The eschar swab procedure is generally preferred over

eschar biopsy by clinicians and patients because it is

easy and non-invasive.

• However, an eschar swab does not allow for

immunohistochemical or cell culture evaluation.

• Obtain specimen before or within 24 hours of initiation

of appropriate antibiotic therapy (i.e. doxycycline).

• Antibiotic treatment should never be delayed to obtain

an eschar specimen.

Clinicians interested in submitting eschar swabs or biopsy samples to CDC for diagnostic testing should 

contact their local or state public health department to coordinate specimen submission to CDC.

For more information:

For more information on how to collect an eschar swab, visit: 

https://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dvbd/pdf/Collection-Submission-Eschar-Swab-SpecimensRickettsial-Disease-508.pdf

For more information on eschar-associated rickettsioses, visit: https://www.cdc.gov/otherspottedfever/index.html 

For more information on scrub typhus, visit: https://www.cdc.gov/typhus/scrub/index.html
No. 10-5567.

#### Sharon Murray, Petitioner v. AT&T Mobility LLC.

562 U.S. 1042, 131 S. Ct. 625,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8861.

178 L. Ed. 2d 432,

November 15, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
#### *Lamont, Petitioner, v. Savio et al., Respondents,*

No. 91880-5.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71465-1-I, April 6, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1044. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 10-10580.

#### Tim Ray Sacora, Larry L. Beaman, and Todd H. Sonobe, Petitioners v. Jeff E. Thomas, Warden.

565 U.S. 841, 132 S. Ct. 152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6179.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 628 F.3d 1059.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert L. Weisman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this special financial report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-2 of ViskaseCompanies, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether material or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: April 6, 2005   /s/ Robert L. Weisman      Robert L. Weisman  President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1



                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                           LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (the "Amendment")
is made this the 28 day of July, 1999 by and among SUNTRUST BANK, NASHVILLE,
N.A. (the "Lender") and LANDAIR CORPORATION and LANDAIR TRANSPORT, INC.
(collectively, the "Borrower").

                                    RECITALS:

         A. Borrower and Lender entered into that certain Loan and Security
Agreement dated January 5, 1999 (the "Agreement").

         B. The Borrower and the Lender are desirous of amending the Agreement
to temporarily waive compliance with certain financial covenants and to increase
the interest rate.

         C. Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
and obligations herein, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement is hereby
amended and modified as follows:

         Section 1. Compliance with Sections 4.1 (EBITR divided by IR Ratio),
4.2 (Adjusted Funded Debt to EBITDAR Ratio), 4.3 (Capitalization Ratio), and 4.4
(Tangible Net Worth) of the Agreement are waived until the fiscal quarter ending
September 30, 1999.

         Section 2. Section 1.4 of the Agreement concerning "Interest" is
amended so that the Applicable Margin during the term of the Agreement shall be
two percent (2%) per annum.

         Section 3. The Borrower, concurrently with the execution hereof, shall
pay Lender a waiver fee of $15,000.

         Section 4. All other applicable provisions of the Agreement are hereby
amended to conform to the amendments as expressed in this Amendment.

         Section 5. Except as provided herein, the Agreement shall remain
unamended and shall be in full force and effect.

         Section 6. This modification shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Tennessee.



<PAGE>   2



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned by and through their duly
authorized officers hereby execute this Amendment as of the day and date first
set forth above.


SUNTRUST BANK, NASHVILLE, N.A.              LANDAIR CORPORATION


By: /s/ Roger D. Osborne                    By: /s/ Edward W. Cook
    -----------------------                    ----------------------------
Title: Vice President                       Title: CFO
      ---------------------                       -------------------------


                                            LANDAIR TRANSPORT, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Edward W. Cook
                                               ---------------------------

                                            Title: CFO
                                                  ------------------------








                                       2
No. 10-6549.

#### Billy Joe Reynolds, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1043,

178 L. Ed. 2d 862,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1033.

January 24, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to Question I presented by the petition.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 125.
**FINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE (FPRC)**

**MEETING - WEB FUND CODE**

**AGENDA**

**Date:** July 30, 2013

**Time:** 1300 – 1500 EDT

**Defense Connect Online Only:****https://connect.dco.dod.mil/sfis**

**as of 7/27/2017 10:01 AM**

This meeting will focus on the Web Fund Code Application that is in development by DLA Transaction Services along with fund code issues related to Standard Line off Accounting (SLOA). Topics are shown below:

1. Welcome

2. Demonstration of the Web Fund Code Application

3. Web Fund Code Application and Fund Code Issues Related To SLOA:

a. Data Elements

b. File Layout

c. Web Fund Code Access Controls

d. Fund Code Output Options

e. Future Fund Code Table Edits

f. Agency Accounting Identifier

g. Reimbursable Flag Indicator

h. Implementation Concept of Operations

i. Fund Code Limitation

4. Web Fund Code File Layout

1
Maintaining critical support to the Marine aviation fleet worldwide takes center stage on DSCR
 
  By Leon W. Moore, Acting Chief of Public Affairs
  The Defense Logistics Aviation Marine Aviation Wholesale Resident Course took place June 6-8 in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. This is the first time the course has been offered since 2019 due the social restrictions put in place by the DLA director due to the COVID-19 pandemic. DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate’s Marine Customer Facing Division’s V-22 Osprey Weapons Systems Support Manager Marine Corps Capt. Elias Jimenez said the three-day course focused on how the wholesale system works to optimize local operational retail inventory. Other focus areas included improving technical research capability, as well as improving overall supply effectiveness for the organizational and intermediate levels of maintenance. Special emphasis was placed on non-mission capable supply scenarios, commonly referred to as NMCS, and how to prevent or minimize these occurrences. Marine Customer Facing Division Operations Officer/KC-130J Weapon System Support Manager Marine Corps Maj. Hunter Hayes said a NMCS scenario is where an aircraft is down for the repair or replacing of a mission-critical part, resulting in a degradation of the squadron’s aircraft readiness and combat lethality. Hayes said preventing and minimizing these types of scenarios is an all-hands effort. He said this starts at the Marine Aviation Logistics Squadrons managing their retail effectiveness and communicating requirements to DLA. The 39 military and civilian individuals who attended the course are attached to or work with Marine aviation units across the country and as far away as Okinawa, Japan.
VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAY 

AGREEMENT 

1. Title 5, United States Code §9902(i) authorizes the Secretary of Defense to establish a 

program to pay a Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) or buyout to eligible 

employees. This is to certify that my application for the buyout is voluntary and the 

effective date of my separation will be ______________________. I understand that 

my request for the personnel action and the payment terms are irrevocable. 

2. I understand that an employee who receives a buyout on the basis of a separation occurring on

or after March 30, 1994, and accepts employment with the Government of the United States 

(including employment in non-appropriated fund instrumentalities or with an agency of the 

United States through a personal services contract with the United States) within 5 years after 

the date of separation on which payment of the buyout is based, will be required, absent an 

authorized waiver, to repay the entire amount of the buyout (gross, before taxes and 

deductions) to the Federal agency that paid the buyout. 

3. I understand that if I elect to receive anything other than a lump-sum payment this 

 form must be received by the DLA Human Resources Center, Customer Support 

 Office, no later than 10 business days before the effective date of my separation. 

Name: 

 Last First MI

SSN: 

Total Buyout Amount Payment Terms Initials 

$ Lump-Sum Payment at time of separation 

$ Equal bi-weekly payments of $__________until my 

buyout is paid in full 

$ Receive 1⁄2 of my VSIP in the amount of $_________ 

Six months following the date of my separation and 

the second half in the amount of $_____________ 

Six months later 

This is to certify that I have been counseled by the Human Resources Office and agree

to the conditions and terms of the buyout. 

_________________________ Date:______________ 

Employee Signature 

_________________________ Date:______________ 

HRO Representative Signature 

"This information is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended."
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Daniel
L Johnston:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Able Energy Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





November
13, 2008





/s/ Daniel L.
      Johnston
              Daniel L. Johnston
              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1
  EMERSON
    RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  EXHIBIT TO
    FORM 10-K
 SUBSIDIARIES
    OF THE REGISTRANT
  Jurisdiction of

Percentage ofName of Subsidiary

Incorporation

OwnershipEmerson Global Limited

British Virgin Islands


100.0
%Emerson Radio (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong Kong


100.0
%*Emerson Radio Macao Commercial Offshore Limited

Macao


100.0
%Majexco Imports, Inc.

California, U.S.A.


100.0
%     *
    
    One share is owned by a resident director, pursuant to local law. 65
1 of 19ELECTRONICALLY FILED FEB 22, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT2 of 193 of 194 of 195 of 196 of 197 of 198 of 199 of 1910 of 1911 of 1912 of 1913 of 1914 of 1915 of 1916 of 1917 of 1918 of 1919 of 19
SCWC-30677

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MANUEL D. SOUND and THOMPSON PHILLIP,

 on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, 

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES;

PATRICIA McMANAMAN in her capacity as Director 1

of the State of Hawai#i, Department of Human Services;

STATE OF HAWAI#I, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

 MED-QUEST DIVISION; DR. KENNETH FINK, in his capacity

as State of Hawai#i, Department of Human Services,

Med-Quest Division Administrator,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(SCWC-30677; CIV. NO. 09-1-2022)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on November 8, 2013, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 12, 2013.

Paul Alston,

J. Blaine Rogers,

and Maile Osika

for petitioners

Heidi M. Rian, 

John F. Molay and

Lee-Ann N.M. Brewer

for respondents

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

During the pendency of this action, Pat McManaman succeeded 1

Lillian B. Koller. Thus, pursuant to Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 43(c)(1), Patricia McManaman has been substituted automatically for

Lillian B. Koller. 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30677

12-DEC-2013

02:46 PM