alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1)                      | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                    |                                    |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                    |
|                                |                                               |                               |
| Date: October              06, 2005 | By:                                           | /s/ Shawn              A. Callahan |
|                                     | Shawn A. CallahanChief                Financial Officer |
#### *State, Respondent, v. Dabalos, Petitioner,*

No. 91731-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71004-4-1, April 20, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1004. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-70033

CHARLES DEAN HOOD

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTES DIVISION

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CV-109

Before SMITH, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dean Hood appeals an order of the district

court, entered July 11, 2008, denying his motions for appointment of counsel and

stay of execution. Hood raises only the following issue before this court: “Does

the federal appointment statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3599, provide prisoners sentenced

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 4, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-70033

1 278 F.3d 459, 462-63 (5th Cir. 2002).

2 No. 07-8521, 2008 WL 2484732 (June 23, 2008).

3 See, e.g., Hain v. Mullin, 434 F.3d 1168, 1172 (10th Cir. 2006) (“Acknowledging a

circuit split on the issue, we nonetheless see no other logical way to read the statute.”).

4 See Turner v. Quarterman, No. 08-70025, 2008 WL 2645674 (5th Cir. July 7, 2008)

(per curiam), petition for reh’g en banc denied (5th Cir. July 10, 2008) (per curiam), cert. denied

and application for stay of execution denied, 2008 WL 2690759 (U.S. July 10, 2008).

2

under state law the right to federally appointed and funded counsel to pursue

clemency under state law?”

We foreclosed this issue in Clark v. Johnson, holding that the statute does

not apply to state clemency proceedings.1 We acknowledge that the Supreme

Court recently granted certiorari in Harbison v. Bell2to consider the issue and

presumably to address the split among the circuits.3 A prior panel of this court

addressed precisely this issue after the Supreme Court granted certiorari in

Harbison, and again held 18 U.S.C. § 3599 inapplicable to such proceedings.4

Although that decision is unpublished and thus not binding on us, we find it

instructive.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court and DENY Hood’s

separate motion for stay of execution.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(B)


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                         BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Craig R. Jones, certify that the periodic report, to which this
Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly present, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of
the date first written above.

         Dated August 26, 2003





                                   /s/ Craig R. Jones
                                   -----------------------
                                   Craig R. Jones
                                   Chief Financial Officer




                                  EXHIBIT 32(B)
No. 10-7513.

#### Joseph Anthony, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1010,

178 L. Ed. 2d 839,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 908.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31715]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 4, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2004-19016.
    Date Filed: December 2, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: December 23, 2010.
    Description: Application of Jetalliance Flugbeiriebs GmbH d/b/a JAF 
Airservice requesting renewal of its exemption authority and for a 
foreign air carrier permit to engage in: (i) Foreign charter air 
transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points 
behind any Member State of the European Union via any point or points 
in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points 
in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign charter air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or 
points in the United States and any point or points in any member of 
the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) other charter air 
transportation; and (iv) transportation authorized by any additional 
route rights made available to European Community carriers in the 
future.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-31715 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
No. 10-10705.

#### Cornell F. Daye, Petitioner v. Jim Rubenstein, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 161,

181 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5887.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 317.
Exhibit 10.1
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
November 5, 2010
 Annual Retainer
 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Board 
 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee 
 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Compensation Committee 
 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman of the Science & Technology Committee 
 Board Meeting Fees
 Committee Meeting Fees
 Options
 Phantom Stock Deferred Compensation Plan
 Umbrella Liability Insurance 
 Travel Expenses 
 Liability Protection 
 
    
    Corporate D&O insurance ($20 million, primary policy from St. Paul)
    
    $30 million additional coverage for the non-employee directors as a group
    
    Georgia statutory exculpation provisions in Articles of Incorporation
    
    Shareholder-approved indemnification (including for shareholder derivative
suit expenses and judgments)
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549


                                 --------------


                                   FORM 10-Q/A



             QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999






                        Commission File Number 333-59393


                           RHYTHMS NetConnections INC.


State of Incorporation:  Delaware              I.R.S. Employer ID #:  33-0747515


Address:    6933 South Revere Parkway               Telephone #:  (303) 476-4200
            Englewood, Colorado  80112-3931








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days    Yes   X    No
                                                -----     -----

As of August 10, a total of 72,244,406 shares of the Registrant's common stock,
$0.001 par value, were issued and outstanding.

<PAGE>

                           RHYTHMS NETCONNECTIONS INC.
                                    SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



/s/ Scott C. Chandler
----------------------------------------------------
Scott C. Chandler
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

October 8, 1999


                                      26
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10015 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER GOINS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 25

- 1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Goins

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Goins h a s not filed a response. W e have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
December 20 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10015 Document: 00513804938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 10015

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRA NTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10015 Document: 00513804938 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
**AP7.2. APPENDIX 7.2**

**SERVICE AND AGENCY CODES[footnoteRef:1]** [1:  Refer to the Treasury Financial Manual Supplement--FAST Book (Part II link to Independent Agencies) for listing of Federal Civil Agency codes https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/fastBook/fastbook_home.htm used as the first two positions of the activity address code (AAC).] 

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

AP7.2-1

APPENDIX 7.2

## 

## 

AP7.2-5	APPENDIX 7.2
No. 10-7643.

#### Ricorte Angulo-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 955,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 241.

178 L. Ed. 2d 788,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 1287.
#### Glen Alden Coal Company, Appellant, *v.*State Tax Equalization Board.

*64Argued January 10, 1951.

Before Drew, C. J., Stern, Stearns, Jones, Bell and Ladner, JJ.

*70
      *Earl G. Harrison,*with him, *Arlih M. Adams, J. H. Oliver, William A. Schnader*and *Schnader,- Harrison, Segal & Lewis,*for appellant.'

*George W.-Keitel,*Deputy Attorney General, with him *H. Albert Lehrman,*Deputy Attorney General and *Charles J. Margiotti,*Attorney. General, for appellees.

March 22, 1951:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The decree of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Richards of the Dauphin County Orphans’ Court, specially presiding.' gee, also, *Newport Township School District v. State Tax Equalization Board,*366 Pa. 603, 79 A. 2d 641.

Appellant to pay costs.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09** 

**- 2339** 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INCORPORATED
,

Plaintiff

– Appellee
,

v.

ARTHUR WILLDEN ,

Defendant

– Appellant,

and

TETRA TECH MM INCORPORATED, a/k/a MFG Incorporate d; TETRA TECH INCORPORATED,

Defendants,

v.

SAN JOSE WATER CONSERVATION CORPORATION; JAMES ROBERT WILLDEN; MICHAEL P. SCHROLL,

Third Party Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Al exandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv

- 00777

- LO

- TRJ )

Submitted : July 8, 2010 Decided: August 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Arthur Willden, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Abram Jones, Thomas Collier Mugavero, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, William Patrick Pearce, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, Jane Saindon Rogers, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Washingt on, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Arthur Willden appeals the d istrict court’s judgment

in favor of AvalonBay Communities, Inc orporated
, after the

district court granted AvalonBay summary judgment on its claims

against Willden and awarded it $7,450,902 in damages. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s judgment. See AvalonBay

Communities, Inc. v. Willden , No. 1:08

- cv

- 007 77

- LO

- TRJ (E.D. Va.

Oct. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Monroe County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Shatrina McCutchen, Appellant, v Steven White, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 866]

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Monroe County (Kohout, J.), entered April 30, 2002, which denied petitioner’s written objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner dismissing a violation petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner, Monroe County Support Collection Unit (SCU), appeals from an order of Family Court denying its written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order, which dismissed without prejudice a violation petition filed by SCU against respondent upon the request of Shatrina McCutchen (mother). By its petition, SCU sought to enforce an order payable through it for support of a child not receiving aid to dependent children. The Hearing Examiner directed SCU to join the mother as a party, and he adjourned the matter for personal service. Although the mother was served, she failed to appear on the adjourned date. The Hearing Examiner dismissed the petition based on his determination that SCU was not a party in interest to the violation proceeding and therefore lacked standing to prosecute the proceeding. In its written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order, SCU asserted that it was authorized both to initiate and prosecute the proceeding based on its role in assisting in the collection of child support orders.

We agree with SCU that, pursuant to Family Ct Act § 453 (a), it had the authority to originate the violation proceeding against respondent. However, we agree with the Hearing Examiner and the court that, because the child was not receiving aid to dependent children, SCU lacked the authority to “prosecute” that violation proceeding unless the mother executed a “Right to Recovery” agreement permitting SCU to recover its costs *(see*18 NYCRR 347.17 [b]). There is no evidence that the mother executed such an agreement. We therefore affirm the order denying SCU’s objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
No. 10-1458.

#### Aura Quinones, Petitioner v. Neighborhood Youth & Family Services, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 822, 132 S. Ct. 109,

181 L. Ed. 2d 35,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5490,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 71 App. Div. 3d 1106, 896 N.Y.S.2d 908.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3043 

To amend section 6906 of title 31, United States Code, to permanently 

authorize the Payment in Lieu of Taxes program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 30, 2019 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK (for herself, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. STEWART, Mr. COOK, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

STANTON, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend section 6906 of title 31, United States Code, 

to permanently authorize the Payment in Lieu of Taxes 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Permanently Authorizing PILT Act’’. 

6 (b) PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION.—Section 6906 of 

7 title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘fis8 cal year 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘each fiscal year’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          77,872
<SECURITIES>                                   100,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,407)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,005
<PP&E>                                          37,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,813)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           474
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,858
<CGS>                                           18,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,220)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)


</TABLE>
No. 10-10310.

#### Christopher Burton Phillips, Petitioner v. City of Renton, Washington.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 84,

181 L. Ed. 2d 15,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6996.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
of Federal Mortgage Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc., that, to his knowledge,
the Annual Report of the company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31,
2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the company's financial condition and
results of operations.


July 13, 2006


 /s/ Peter Porath
-----------------------------
Peter Porath, Vice President







                                       15