alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

6041 Spurlock 1

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

N/A N/A N/A Method 26A N/A N/A N/A Method 26A N/A N/A N/A Method 26A N/A N/A N/A Method 26A N/A N/A N/A Method 26A N/A N/A N/A Method 26A Test End Time Chlorine Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4
EX-10.19



 EXHIBIT 10.19 
  

	***	INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. 

 Medlmmune 

September 21, 2012 
 Carlos Paya, M.D.,
Ph.D. 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Immune Design Corporation

 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 700 
 Seattle, Washington 98104

 RE: License Agreement (“Agreement”), effective as of October 15, 2010, by and between Immune Design Corporation (“IDC”)
and MedImmune, LLC (“MedImmune”). (Capitalized terms in this notice shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.) 
 Dear
Dr. Paya: 
 The purpose of this letter is to notify IDC of MedImmune’s desire to extend the date that MedImmune is obligated to
initiate Commercially Reasonable Effort under the Agreement related to *** (“*** Agreement”). MedImmune is pursuing Commercially Reasonable Efforts with respect to an *** Product. Therefore, pursuant to Section 3.1(a) of the ***
Agreement, MedImmune’s obligations to initiate Commercially Reasonable Efforts under the *** Agreement shall be further extended to *** after the Effective Date, or ***. 

If you have any questions with regards to this notice, please contact Michael McCarthy at *** or Peter Gatto at ***. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Steven Projan
	Steven Projan
	Senior Vice President, Research & Development MedImmune, LLC

  
  

 

	cc:	Peter Gatto, Michael McCarthy [MedImmune] 

 One MedImmune Way — Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878 — 301-398-0000 — Fax: 301-398-9000
No. 10-476.

#### Varsha Mahender Sabhnani, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1194, 131 S. Ct. 1000,

178 L. Ed. 2d 855,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 699.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 215.
Status as of 3/11/2011

**DLMS Supplements (DS) which have Unique Item Identifier (UII)* placeholder and serial number capability**

*****In DLMS, UII is the overarching term which includes DOD’s IUID constructs 1 and 2, as well as the DoD recognized IUID equivalents (e.g., VIN, GRAI, etc). 

Refer to the UID website (http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/index.html) for information on IUID, 

DoD IUID constructs 1 and 2, and for a current list of DoD recognized IUID equivalents. 

The DS are available at:  http://www.dla.mil/j-6/dlmso/elibrary/TransFormats/140_997.asp
No. 10-10325.

#### Howard Ellis, Petitioner v. Nevada.

565 U.S. 803, 132 S. Ct. 371,

181 L. Ed. 2d 3,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6968.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 127 Nev. 1132, 373 P.3d 912.
# C_2016156EN.01000701.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — Buzzi Unicem SpA v European Commission

(Case C-267/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Market for ‘cement and related products’ - Administrative procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 18(1) and (3) - Decision requesting information - Statement of reasons - Clarification of the application))

(2016/C 156/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Buzzi Unicem SpA (represented by: C. Osti, A. Prastaro and A. Sodano, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in Buzzi Unicem v Commission (T-297/11, EU:T:2014:122); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in Buzzi Unicem v Commission (T-297/11, EU:T:2014:122);

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2356 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2356 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Buzzi Unicem SpA with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-297/11 and the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Buzzi Unicem SpA with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-297/11 and the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Bobby Jo F., Appellant. Genesee County Attorney, Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 522]

*1473Appeal from an order of Family Court, Genesee County (Adams, J.), entered February 20, 2003, which adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services of Genesee County for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52). We reject his contention that the petition is facially deficient because the supporting depositions are not attached to it. “Family Court Act § 311.2 measures the sufficiency of a petition by the sum of its two parts: the verified petition . . . and any supporting depositions filed [, as here,] with the petition” *(Matter of Neftali D.,*85 NY2d 631, 635 [1995]; *see Matter of Charles BB.,*277 AD2d 756 [2000]).

Respondent also contends that the petition is facially deficient because it fails to allege lack of consent as an element of the offense (s*ee*Penal Law § 130.05). We disagree. The complainant’s statement, affirmed under penalty of perjury and on file with Family Court, alleges that the complainant is 16 years old, and thus she is deemed incapable of consent *(see*§ 130.05 [3] [a]). We further reject respondent’s contention that the petition is facially deficient because it fails to allege with sufficient specificity when the alleged forcible touching occurred. Because the petition as amplified by the bill of particulars charges acts allegedly committed during a designated time period, it conforms to the requirements of Family Ct Act § 311.1 (3) (g) and thus is facially sufficient *(see People v Morris,*61 NY2d 290, 294 [1984]).

Finally, we conclude that the evidence of lack of consent is legally sufficient *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Petitioner established at the fact-finding hearing that the complainant is less than 17 years old *(see*Penal Law § 130.05 [2] [b]; [3] [a]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to
his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




/S/ DAVID C. KAHN
-----------------------
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
MAY 11, 2007
# DLA to hold Restoration Advisory Board meeting April 11 in Chesterfield

/ Published April 6, 2016
RICHMOND, Va. , 
Defense Logistics Agency officials from Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, will host a Restoration Advisory Board meeting at 7:30 p.m., April 11, 2016 at the Bensley Community Center located at 2900 Drewry's Bluff Rd., North Chesterfield, Virginia 23237. The meeting is open to the public.   

As part of ongoing evaluation and cleanup, DLA has established a citizen advisory committee called a Restoration Advisory Board (RAB).  The RAB comprises members from the community, DLA, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 

The meeting will cover the DLA Installation Support at Richmond, Environmental Office's ongoing groundwater testing results and remediation activities for operable units on center.
Quitlines :30

Quitlines Support Your Patients Who Smoke 

The spot opens with the Dr. Brenna VanFrank speaking to the camera. The CDC logo appears. A name 

card appears which reads: “Brenna VanFrank, MD, MSPH, Senior Medical Officer, Office on Smoking and 

Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”

DR. BRENNA VANFRANK: Quitting smoking isn’t easy. The good news is we have proven treatments to 

help patients quit, including counseling and medication. 

The spot cuts to footage of a male quitline coach talking into a headset, then cuts to a young man talking 

with him on the phone. We cut back and forth between the two as they talk to each other.

DR. BRENNA VANFRANK: Additional support is available through your state quitline, which is a free 

and confidential telephone service. When your patients call a quitline, highly trained counselors will 

help them build a plan for quitting, discuss medications, and connect them to other free resources to 

help them quit. 

The spot cuts back to Dr. Brenna VanFrank speaking to the camera.

DR. BRENNA VANFRANK: Combined with your support, the quitline can help your patients quit for 

good.

ART CARD: Learn how to help your patients quit at CDC.gov/TobaccoHCP

The CDC logo appears on screen.
# C_2015311EN.01001101.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-145/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Directive 1999/31/EC - Article 14 - Landfill of waste - Non-hazardous waste - Non-conformity of existing landfills))

(2015/C 311/11)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Petrova and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented by E. Petranova and D. Drambozova, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that, as from 16 July 2009, the existing landfills for non-hazardous waste in its territory do not continue to function unless they satisfy the requirements of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 14(a) to (c) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that, as from 16 July 2009, the existing landfills for non-hazardous waste in its territory do not continue to function unless they satisfy the requirements of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 14(a) to (c) of that directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Bulgaria to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Bulgaria to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION****906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GaryD. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                       The reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                       The informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gary D. Black       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Gary D. Black           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| Date:  October 25, 2007 |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Janus Capital Group Inc. and will be retained by Janus CapitalGroup Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stevan R. Schott, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March, 2005.



/s/    STEVAN R. SCHOTTStevan R. Schott Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-51061 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ESTEBAN FLORES-RUBIO, also known as Jose Luis Medina-Flores, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-1551-1
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Esteban F lores-Rubio appeals f rom his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following r emoval f rom the U nited States. H e contends that his sentence of supervised r e l e a s e w a s p r o c e d urally a nd substantively unreasonable because the district court did not c o nsider U

. S.S.G. § 5 D1.1(c) and its accompanyin g c o m m e ntary and failed to explicitly f ind that the sentence was justified by the need for an extra measure of deterrence. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D J uly10, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-51061 Document: 00512302769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2013No. 12-51061

Flores-Rubio did not raise his a rguments i n t he district court, so our review i s f

or plain error. See United States v . D o m i ng uez-Alvarado , 695 F.3d 324, 327 (5th Cir. 2012). Most of the d istrict court’s comments at s e n t encing

were directed at F lores-Rubio’s long-running cycle of entering the United States, committing crimes, being imprisoned, b eing removed, then illegally reentering the U n ited St a t e s a n d beginning the cycle over a gain. The district court admonished Fl o r e s - R ubio to a void the temptation to return to this country, as
a return to the United S t ates w ould r e sult in a new term of imprisonment. Flores-Rubio h ad been removed f rom t he United States four times, and he had

a lengthy and serious criminal h istory in this country. A lthough the district court did not explicitly find that the particular facts o f F lores-Rubio’s case warranted a sentence of supervised release, the d i strict court’s explanation was adequat e to support the supervised release s entence. See United States v. Cancino-Trinidad , 710 F.3d 601, 607 (5th Cir. 2013). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-51061 Document: 00512302769 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/10/2013
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of Ennis  Business  Forms,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February
28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Keith  S.  Walters,  Chief
Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

  (1) The   Report   fully   complies  with the  requirements  of
      section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
      1934; and

  (2) The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents,
      in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
      result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2003
ACCEPTED

14-15-00672-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/11/2015 3:17:15 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/11/2015 3:17:15 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

June 05, 2014

Hon. Miguel Alberto Saldana

Attorney at Law

105 E. 3rd Street

Weslaco, TX 78596

Hon. Keith C. Livesay

517 W. Nolana

Brazos Suites No. 9

McAllen, TX 78504

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00568-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-4271-13-B

Style: LA VILLA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. 

THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN FOR THE CITY OF LA VILLA

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

93rd District Court

Hon. Laura Hinojosa, Hidalgo County District Clerk

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region