Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 1998 / Proposed Rules 3673

site: The identity of scrapie infected flocks

and source flocks designated under part 79,

and the identity and certification status of

flocks participating in the Voluntary

Program. Should APHIS continue to provide

this information on the Web?

• To assess the impacts of options

regarding the interstate movement of sheep

and goats, baseline estimates of costs and

benefits are needed. What are the costs and

benefits of the current system of part 79,

State quarantine standards, and the

Voluntary Program? For example, what costs

are involved in complying with State

quarantine programs and how large are these

costs? Similarly, what are the costs to a flock

owner who participates in the Voluntary

Program?

We invite comments on these topics.

We also welcome ideas as to different

approaches we might take to improve

our scrapie programs. In responding to

the questions posed in this notice,

commenters are urged to include

economic reasons and data supporting

their positions.

Whenever possible, please refer to

specific terms, definitions, or

procedures contained in the current

regulations in 9 CFR parts 54 and 79,

and in the program standards UM&R

(available at http://

www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/scrapie/umr). A

hard-copy of the program standards

UM&R may be obtained by contacting

the individual listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. These resources

should provide a common context for

discussing suggested changes. You may

also wish to refer to the Scrapie Flock

Status Report on the APHIS Web, which

lists the certification status of flocks in

the Voluntary Program and identifies

known infected and source flocks

nationwide. This report is at http://

www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/scrapie/

status.html.

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 111–114, 114a, 115,

117, 120, 121, 123–126, 134a–134h; 7 CFR

2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).

Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of

January 1998.

Thomas E. Walton,

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant

Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 98–1810 Filed 1–21–98; 4:40 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410–34–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 50

RIN 3150–AE26

Industry Codes and Standards:

Amended Requirements

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Extension of public comment

period on proposed rule.

SUMMARY: On December 3, 1997, (62 FR

63892) the NRC published for public

comment a proposed rule to amend its

regulations to incorporate by reference

later editions and addenda of the

American Society of Mechanical

Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel

Code. The comment period for this

proposed rule was to have expired on

March 3, 1998. The Nuclear Energy

Institute (NEI), on behalf of the nuclear

energy industry, requested an extension

of the comment period for the proposed

revision. NEI stated that the

comprehensive nature of this proposed

rule will require a significant effort to

collect and review comments from

members of the industry. The NRC

agrees that the proposed rule constitutes

a significant revision to 10 CFR 50.55a.

In order to ensure that the NRC receives

comments from the parties most likely

to be affected by the revision, the NRC

has decided to extend the public

comment period for an additional 30

days. The extended comment period

now expires on April 3, 1998.

DATES: The comment period has been

extended and now expires April 3,

1998. Comments received after this date

will be considered if it is practical to do

so, but the Commission is able to ensure

consideration only for comments

received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to:

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001. ATTN: Rulemaking and

Adjudications Staff. Hand deliver

comments to 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland, 20852, between

7:30 am and 4:15 pm on Federal

workdays.

You may also provide comments via

the NRC’s interactive rulemaking

website through the NRC home page

(http://www.nrc.gov). This site provides

the availability to upload comments as

files (any format), if your web browser

supports that function. For information

about the interactive website, contact

Ms. Carol Gallagher, (301) 415–5905;

e-mail CAG@nrc.gov.

Single copies of this proposed

rulemaking may be obtained by written

request or telefax to 301–415–2260 or

from Frank C. Cherny, Division of

Engineering Technology, Office of

Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555–0001,

Telephone: 301–415–6786, or Wallace

E. Norris, Division of Engineering

Technology, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, Telephone: 301–415–6796.

Certain documents related to this

rulemaking, including comments

received, may be examined at the NRC

Public Document Room, 2120 L Street

NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC.

These same documents may also be

viewed and downloaded via the

interactive rulemaking website as

established by NRC for this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank C. Cherny, 301–415–6786.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day

of January, 1998.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

L. Joseph Callan,

Executive Director for Operations.

[FR Doc. 98–1750 Filed 1–23–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–ASO–31]

Proposed Amendment to Class E

Airspace; Daytona Beach, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

amend Class E airspace at Daytona

beach, FL. A Global Positioning System

(GPS) Runway (RWY) 6 (Special)

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedure (SIAP) has been developed

for Spruce Creek Airport. As a result,

additional controlled airspace extending

upward from 700 feet Above Ground

Level (AGL) is needed to accommodate

the SIAP and for Instrument Flight

Rules (IFR) operations at Spruce Creek

Airport. The operating status of the

airport will change from Visual Flight

Rules (VFR) to include IFR operations

concurrent with the publication of the

SIAP.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before February 25, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Docket No.

97–ASO–31, Manager, Airspace Branch,

ASO–520, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta,

Georgia 30320.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel for Southern Region, Room 550,

1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,

Georgia 30337; telephone (404) 305–

5586.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy B. Shelton, Airspace Branch, Air
3674 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 1998 / Proposed Rules

Traffic Division, Federal Aviation

Administration, P.O. Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)

305–5586.

SUPPLEMENTATRY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 97–

ASO–31.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received before the specified closing

date for comments will be considered

before taking action on the proposed

rule. The proposal contained in this

notice may be changed in light of the

comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel for Southern

Region, Room 550, 1701 Columbia

Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337,

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Manager,

Airspace Branch, ASO–520, Air Traffic

Division, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta,

Georgia 30320. Communications must

identify the notice number of this

NPRM. Persons interested in being

placed on a mailing list for future

NPRMs should also request a copy of

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, which

describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend

Class E airspace at Daytona Beach, FL.

A GPS RWY 6 (Special) SIAP has been

developed for Spruce Creek Airport.

Additional controlled airspace

extending upward from 700 feet AGL is

needed to accommodate the SIAP and

for IFR operations at Spruce Creek

Airport. The operating status of the

airport will change from VFR to include

IFR operations concurrent with the

publication of the SIAP. This

amendment would also reflect the

current name of the Daytona Beach

Airport. Class E airspace designations

for airspace areas extending upward

from 700 feet or more above the surface

of the earth are published in Paragraph

6005 of FAA Order 7400.9E, dated

September 10, 1997, and effective

September 16, 1997, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class E airspace designation

listed this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current. It,

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action’’ under Executive

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation

as the anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule,

when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS,

AIRWAYS, ROUTES, AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9E, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 10, 1997, and effective

September 16, 1997, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO FL E5 Daytona Beach, FL [Revised]

Daytona Beach International Airport, FL

(Lat. 29°10′52′′ N, long. 81°03′21′′ W)

Spruce Creek Airport, FL

(Lat. 29°04′49′′ N, long. 81°02′48′′ W)

Ormond Beach Municipal Airport, FL

(Lat. 29°18′04′′ N, long. 81°06′50′′ W)

Ormond Beach VORTAC

(Lat. 29°18′12′′ N, long. 81°06′46′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet or more above the surface of the earth

within a 10-mile radius of Daytona Beach

International Airport, and within a 6.4-mile

radius of Spruce Creek Airport, and within

a 6.4-mile radius of Ormond Beach

Municipal Airport, and within 3.2 miles each

side of the Ormond Beach VORTAC 256°

radial extending from the 6.4-mile radius to

7 miles west of the VORTAC.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on

December 18, 1997.

Nancy B. Shelton,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 98–1746 Filed 1–23–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–ANM–16]

Proposed Amendment to Class E

Airspace; McCall, ID

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would

amend the McCall, ID, Class E airspace.

If amended, the proposal would provide

the additional airspace necessary to

fully encompass two new Standard

Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP)

at McCall Airport, McCall, ID.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before March 12, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Manager,

Airspace Branch, ANM–520, Federal

Aviation Administration, Docket No.

97–ANM–16, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056.