alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

The Titan Corporation
and its subsidiaries
as of March 4, 2005

|    |  | Name                                                |  | Subsidiary of:        |  | Domicile           
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------
|1.  |  | Canco, LLC                                          |  | Cayenta, Inc.         |  | Delaware           
|2.  |  | Cayenta Operating LLC                               |  | Cayenta, Inc.         |  | Delaware           
|3.  |  | Cayenta, Inc.                                       |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Delaware           
|4.  |  | Shellco, Inc. (f/n/a Datacentric Automation Corp.   |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Delaware           
|5.  |  | Datron Transworld Communications International Ltd. |  | The Titan Corporation |  | U.S. Virgin Islands
|6.  |  | Horizons Technology International, Ltd.             |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Barbados           
|7.  |  | International Systems LLC                           |  | The Titan Corporation |  | California         
|8.  |  | LinCom Wireless, Inc.                               |  | LinCom Corporation    |  | Delaware           
|9.  |  | Procom Services, Inc.                               |  | The Titan Corporation |  | California         
|10. |  | Titan Africa, Inc.                                  |  | Titan Wireless, Inc.  |  | Delaware           
|11. |  | Titan Deutschland GmbH                              |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Germany            
|12. |  | Titan Facilities, Inc.                              |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Virginia           
|13. |  | Titan Italia Srl                                    |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Italy              
|14. |  | Titan Scan Technologies Corporation                 |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Delaware           
|15. |  | Titan Systems Solutions UK Ltd.                     |  | The Titan Corporation |  | United Kingdom     
|16. |  | Titan Wireless Afripa Holding, Inc.                 |  | Titan Wireless, Inc.  |  | Delaware           
|17. |  | Titan Wireless, Inc.                                |  | The Titan Corporation |  | Delaware           

---



QuickLinks
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0449 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-021-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 10-10751.

#### Dennis A. Givens, Petitioner v. Rebecca Randolph, et al.

565 U.S. 847, 132 S. Ct. 167,

181 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6368.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 565.
# C_2015146EN.01001201.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/12

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-374/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 181 - Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark HIPERDRIVE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(c) - General principle of equal treatment))

(2015/C 146/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH (represented by S. Walter, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2) | Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 06.10.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of China Junlian Integrated Surveillance, Inc. (the Company) certify that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 14, 2007 /s/ Yuan Gang Yuan Gang (Chief Executive Officer)  August 14, 2007 /s/ Wang Lei Wang Lei (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2013226EN.01002502.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/25

---

Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)

(Case T-318/13)

(2013/C 226/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vita Phone GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by P. Ruess and A. Doepner-Thiele, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2013 in Case R 1072/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2013 in Case R 1072/2012-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘LIFEDATA’ for goods and services in Classes 10 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 10 525 053

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
NO. 07-05-0393-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

DECEMBER 21, 2006

______________________________

BARBARA STONE, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2004-407,187; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING

_______________________________

DISSENT

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion to the extent it holds that appellant’s

consent was voluntary and sufficiently attenuated from the illegal entry and detention.

Simply put, there is no material distinction between the facts here and those in Grimaldo

v. State, No. 07-04-0245-CR, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 1824 (Tex. App.–Amarillo March 8,

2006, no pet. h.); thus, the decision in Grimaldo controls the outcome at bar. 

The decision to enter without a valid warrant was made once it was determined that

the substance obtained from the house was contraband. That is, the officers “decided to
2

go ahead and make entry into the apartment, secure the persons inside, either until [they]

could obtain a search warrant or [they] could obtain consent to search from whoever was

in charge of the residence.” So, the purpose of the officers was clear when they undertook

to unlawfully enter the home with guns drawn. They were intent on conducting a search,

one way or the other.

Additionally, it is difficult to deny that police observation of the contraband arose

from the unlawful entry into and sweep of the location. Again, no warrant authorized the

entry or a search, the contraband they sought was not within plain view, and mere minutes

lapsed from the decision to undertake forced entry to the discovery of the cocaine. 

Finally, while it may be that appellant was told of her right to refuse consent, one

can only wonder if her response evinced a legitimate choice. By that time, the officers had

already entered the home illegally with guns drawn, and seized all present without legal

justification. Nothing of record suggests that the officers would have left the premises or

momentarily released their detainees had consent been denied. The contrary would seem

true given the general intent to search one way or another. Nor can I discount the

undeniable affect on one’s ability to think clearly of the unlawful presence of armed police

officers roaming throughout the home. 

As previously stated, the circumstances here are materially indistinguishable from

those in Grimaldo. So, I conclude that appellant’s motion to suppress should have been

granted.

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice

Publish.
2 

ADC 315 

Administrative Change to DLMS Note for Fund Code in DLMS 810L, Logistics Bill 

1. ORIGINATING SERVICE/AGENCY AND POC INFORMATION:

a. Service/Agency: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO) 

b. Originator: Mr. Robert Hammond, DLMSO, DOD Finance Review 

Committee Chair, 703-767-2117, DSN 427-2117 or email: 

robert.hammond@dla.mil. 

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Finance 

3. REFERENCE: 

a. DoD 4000.25-M, Defense Logistics Management System (DLMS) DLMS 

Volume 5 (Finance), Chapter 5 - Interfund Billing System Procedures. 

4. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Description of Change: This change modifies the DLMS Supplement (DS) 

810L to incorporate an administrative change to correct an incorrect DLMS 

note regarding the qualifier DG (Fund Code), which incorrectly states that the 

fund code may not be used with Interfund bills. 

b. Background: The DLMS note for qualifier DG (Fund Code) at 2/LQ01/310 

incorrectly states that the Fund Code may not be used in when 1/BIG07/20 is 

code PP (which indicates that the Summary Bill is for Interfund processing). 

DAASC does not have an edit to enforce this DLMS note, so no change is 

required at DAASC. This change was discussed at the DLMS Finance Process 

Review Committee (FPRC) meeting held November 13, 2008. It was agreed 

by the Components in attendance that this change should be approved. 

c. Procedures: Revise 810L DLMS Supplement as follows: 

Item # Location Revision to 810L 

Logistics Bill Reason 

1. DLMS 

Introductory 

Note 

Add ADC 315 to Introductory DLMS note 8.

- ADC 315, Administrative Change to DLMS Note for 

Fund Code in DLMS 810L, Logistics Bill 

To identify DLMS 

changes included in the 

DS 

2. 2/LQ01/310 Delete the following DLMS Note.

DG Fund Code 

DLMS NOTE: May not be used when 1/BIG07/020 is 

code PP.

This note incorrectly 

prohibits the use of the 

Fund Code with 

Interfund bill. 
3 

5. REASON FOR CHANGE: The note restricting the use of the Fund Code for 

Interfund billing is incorrect.

6. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES: 

a. Advantages: Corrects an error in the DS 810L.

b. Disadvantages: None noted. 

7. IMPACT: 

a. Data Content/Procedures: None noted. 

b. Unresolved Issues: None noted.

o Implementation: The changes should be effective immediately. 

c. Publication:

o This change will impact the DLMS 810L.
#### *Guttormsen et al., Petitioners, v. Aurora Bank et al., Respondents,*

No. 92185-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72506-8-I, August 3, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1019. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
**Attachment v1**

**Action Item Tracker – PQDR PRC 23-01 Meeting (May 17, 2023)**

**Current as of October 24, 2023**

PQDR 23-01 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/Defense-Data-Standards/Committees/PQDR/   

Page **4** of **5**
No. 10-1425.

#### Harold I. Eist, Petitioner v. Maryland State Board of Physicians.

565 U.S. 820, 132 S. Ct. 105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6817.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 417 Md. 545, 11 A.3d 786.
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:11 PM To: Werner, Christopher; Lorang, Phil Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirem ents for State Plans (RIN 2060- AS55) Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563 _RHR NPRM_03222016.docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed
Categories: Regional Haze



### Attached please find the summary of additional inte ragency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the d raft proposed rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55).

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
EXHIBIT 3.7


          CERTIFICATE ELIMINATING REFERENCE TO SERIES B 7% CONVERTIBLE
              PREFERRED STOCK FROM THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated

      (Pursuant to Section 151 (g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law)

EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "corporation"),
does hereby certify:

     1. The name of the corporation is EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated.

     2. The designation of the series of shares of stock of the corporation to
which this certificate relates is Series B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock.

     3. The voting powers, designations, preferences, and the relative,
participating, optional, or other rights, and the qualifications, limitations,
and restrictions of the Series B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock were provided
for in a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the corporation
pursuant to authority expressly vested in it by the provisions of its
certificate of incorporation. A Certificate of Designations, corrected by
Certificate of Correction and amended by Certificate of Amendment, corrected by
Certificate of Correction (as so amended and corrected, the "Certificate of
Designations"), setting forth such resolution, as amended by the stockholders,
has been heretofore filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
pursuant to the provisions of Section 151 (g) of the General Corporation law of
the State of Delaware.

     4. The Board of Directors of the corporation has adopted the following
resolutions:

        RESOLVED, that none of the authorized shares of the corporation's Series
     B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding and none will be issued
     subject to the Certificate of Designations; and be it further

        RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the corporation are hereby
     authorized and directed to file a certificate setting forth this resolution
     with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to the
     provisions of Section 151 (g) of the General Corporation Law of the State
     of Delaware for the purpose of eliminating from the certificate of
     incorporation of the corporation all reference to the Series B 7%
     Convertible Preferred Stock.

Executed on this 11th day of November, 2003.

                                      /S/ DR. JOHN J. MCGRATH
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Dr. John J. McGrath
                                      Chief Executive Officer and President
Video: Cómo usar un aerosol nasal de nicotina

AUDIO: Música sin letra reproduciéndose hasta el final del video.

TARJETA DE TÍTULO - TEXTO EN PANTALLA:

Cómo usar un aerosol nasal de nicotina

El aerosol nasal de nicotina está disponible solo con receta médica. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: El texto del título está en un cuadrado. En el fondo hay una animación con 

aerosoles nasales y puntos de colores que se cruzan en forma diagonal detrás del cuadrado de texto. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Comience a usar el aerosol nasal en la fecha en que va a dejar de fumar.

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: La fecha para dejar de fumar aparece dentro de un círculo en un calendario.

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Úselo según las indicaciones de su proveedor de atención médica

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Se ve un médico sosteniendo un aerosol nasal.

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: y las instrucciones del envase. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Entran en forma de animación el aerosol nasal, la caja y las instrucciones. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Antes de usarlo, suénese la nariz para despejarla. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Se muestra a una persona sonándose la nariz con un pañuelo desechable de papel. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Respire por la boca. Incline la cabeza hacia atrás. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: La persona inclina la cabeza hacia atrás, respirando por la boca. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Rocíe una vez dentro de cada fosa nasal. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: La persona mueve el aerosol nasal hasta la fosa nasal y luego rocía en cada fosa 

nasal. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: No aspire, trague ni inhale mientras rocía. 
TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: El fondo son puntos de colores sin movimiento.

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: Espere al menos 2 minutos para absorber la nicotina antes de sonarse la nariz. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Comienza una animación con el cronómetro. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: El uso correcto lo ayudará a evitar efectos secundarios...

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Fondo sólido.

TEXTO EN PANTALLA: y a mantenerse sin fumar.

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Un brazo con la mano en un gesto de “pulgar hacia arriba” entra en la escena. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA:

Hable con su proveedor de atención médica para obtener ayuda con el uso de medicamentos para dejar 

de fumar.

Para obtener más ayuda para dejar de fumar, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: El texto está en un cuadrado. En el fondo hay una animación con aerosoles nasales 

y puntos de colores que se cruzan en forma diagonal detrás del cuadrado de texto. 

TEXTO EN PANTALLA:

Este video es parte de una colaboración con la Iniciativa Smokefree.gov del Instituto Nacional del 

Cáncer.

Los CDC no respaldan a ninguna organización, producto o servicio en particular. 

TEXTO DESCRIPTIVO: Logotipos conjuntos del Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de los EE. 

UU. y los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 135O,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of PocketSpec  Technologies  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSBSB for the period  ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report').  I,
Cynthia Kettl, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


              By: /s/  Cynthia Kettl
                  ---------------------------------------
                  Cynthia Kettl,  Chief Financial Officer



           Dated: 09/13/02
No. 10-6053.

#### Oliver Giola West, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert Dennison, Chairperson, New York Board of Parole, et al.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 512,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8583.

178 L. Ed. 2d 379,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
*June  2001 DRAFT*

DoD 4000.25-2-M

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.58. APPENDIX 3.58**

**TRANSACTION REJECT**

## 

**AP3.1-**

AP3.58-1

APPENDIX 3.58