alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF THE FIFTH MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AVIATION CONSUMER PROTECTION

This notice announces the cancellation of the fifth meeting of the Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection originally scheduled for October 8, 2013 , from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. , Eastern Time, in the Quesada Auditorium at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) headquarters at 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. The Federal Register notice announcing this meeting was published Tuesday, September 10, 2013 (78 FR 55327).
Due to the lapse in funding of the Federal government on October 1, 2013, key preparations for the fifth committee meeting by law must be placed on hold until funding is resumed. As such, the meeting is cancelled until further notice. The public will be notified through the Federal Register when the committee meeting is rescheduled.
Issued in Washington, D.C. , on October 1, 2013.

## ~~-**=---=z~ ==---~**  Samuel Podberesky Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings U.S. Department ofTransportation
No. 09-6822.

#### Jason Pepper, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 821, 131 S. Ct. 380,

178 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6227.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. Alfredo Parrish, Esquire, of Des Moines, Iowa, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case. Motion of petitioner for leave to file volume II of the joint appendix under seal granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOSE LUIS M U

NOZ-GAR C IA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10028

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00501-R C C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na M arvin E. Aspe n, Distric t Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 *** B e fore : WALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . Jose Luis Munoz -Garc ia

a ppe a ls from

the distric t

c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 70-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r 

# FIL ED D EC 12 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble M arvin E. Aspe n , Se nior Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Northe rn Distric t of Illinois, sitting by de s igna tion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . M unoz -Garc ia

c onte nds tha

t his c onvic tion a

n d se nte nc e viola

t e the Fifth and Sixth Am e ndm e nts be c a use the fa c t of the prior c onvic t ion tha t subje c te d him to e nha nc e d pe na l tie s unde r se c tion 1326(b)(2) wa s not a lle ge d in the indic tm e nt. As M unoz -Garc ia a c k

nowle dge s, we are bound by Alme ndare z -Torre s v . Unite d State s , 523 U.S. 224, 239-47 (1998), in whic h the Supre m e C ourt re

j e c te d this argum e nt. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 0 0 2 8 2
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: R9AirPermits

Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 4:33 PM

To: 'buzzbn@yahoo.com'

Cc: R9AirPermits

Subject: McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility Final PSD Permit Decision 

Dear Mr. Ryan Bean, 

You are receiving this letter for one of the following reasons: 

1) You provided timely written comments or oral testimony to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) regarding the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit 

amendment for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility (MCU Facility), an existing oil and 

gas production operation that is owned, in partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and 

operated by the Resolute Natural Resources Company (Resolute); or 

2) You requested notice of the final permit decision. 

The final PSD permit amendment, our responses to public comments, and other key documents relevant to the 

final permit are also available through a link at our website, http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/preventionsignificant-deterioration-psd-permits-issued-region-9, or at http://www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-

OAR-2014-0785). If you would like to receive a hardcopy of the final permit decision, which includes the final 

PSD permit amendment and our responses to public comments, and our notice announcing the final permit 

decision, please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov. 

In accordance with 40 CFR 124.15, this permit will become effective thirty (30) days after the EPA has 

provided notice of the final decision, unless the permit is timely appealed. Pursuant to 40 CFR 124.19, any 

person who commented on the proposed permit or participated in the public hearing on the proposed permit 

may appeal the decision and permit conditions to the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) within 30 days after 

the EPA has provided notice of the final permit decision. Any person who failed to file comments or failed to 

participate in the public hearing on the proposed PSD permit revision may file an appeal with the EAB only 

regarding changes from the proposed to the final permit decision. 

If you have any questions about this final action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or 

r9airpermits@epa.gov. 

Thank you. 

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579
No. 10-7396.

#### Robert B. Burke, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1103, 131 S. Ct. 813,

178 L. Ed. 2d 546,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9471.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 136.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ DAVID WEINBERGDAVID WEINBERGChief Financial Officer
# Two DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor Sailors Reenlist

/ Published Jan. 4, 2016
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, LS1 Roberto Lucero and LS2 Jamey Smith of DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor Maritime re-enlisted at the top of Lanikai Pillbox atop Ka'Iwa Ridge this December. The weather was perfect for the morning hike to the Pillbox, which was attended by all DLA Maritime Military Personnel. CDR Thomas Marszalek, DLA Maritime Director, officiated the re-enlistment. Hailing from El Paso, Texas, LS1 Lucero enlisted in 2007 and reported to DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor in January 2013.  He re-enlisted for four years and will be transferring to the USS Carl Vinson, CVN 70, in January 2016.Hailing from Agana, Guam, LS2 Smith enlisted in 2008 and reported to DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor in September 2013.  He re-enlisted for four years and desires to get orders to an aircraft carrier in San Diego.  Marszalek  said: “Congratulations to both LS1 Lucero and LS2 Smith on their re-enlistment. It is great to have two top performing Sailors decide to continue to stay Navy and to continue to unselfishly serve their country!”
No. 09-10755.

#### Joseph Smith, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 809, 132 S. Ct. 81,

181 L. Ed. 2d 13,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6766.

October 3, 2011.

Respondent requested to file a response to the petition for rehearing within 30 days.

Former decision, 564 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 3087, 180 L. Ed. 2d 912, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5006.
No. 10-5637.

#### Anna M. Buenrostro, Petitioner v. Department of Justice.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 696,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9188.

178 L. Ed. 2d 526,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 330, 178 L. Ed. 2d 215, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7429.
No. 10-8053.

#### Nehgui Norman Cox, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1206, 131 S. Ct. 1057,

178 L. Ed. 2d 874,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1034.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 617.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2557 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2557

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the recruitment of 
           physicians in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2019

 Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York (for himself, Ms. Stefanik, Ms. 
Titus, Mr. Young, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, and Mrs. Lee of Nevada) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the recruitment of 
           physicians in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Get Veterans a Doctor Now Act''.

SEC. 2. RECRUITMENT OF PHYSICIANS IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7402(b)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or to be offered a contingent 
        appointment to such position,'' after ``position,''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
        following new subparagraph (B):
            ``(B)(i) have completed a residency program satisfactory to 
        the Secretary; or
            ``(ii) with respect to an offer for a contingent 
        appointment upon the completion of a post-graduate training 
        program, complete such a residency program by not later than 
        two years after the date of such offer; and''.
    (b) Oversight of Graduate Medical Education Programs.--The 
Secretary shall--
            (1) ensure that a recruiter or other similar official of 
        each Veterans Integrated Service Network visits, not less than 
        annually, each allopathic and osteopathic teaching institution 
        with a graduate medical education program within the Network to 
        recruit individuals to be appointed to positions in the 
        Veterans Health Administration; and
            (2) submit to Congress an annual report on the 
        implementation of paragraph (1), including the success of such 
        recruiting efforts.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2969 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2969

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, as the ``Althea Margaret 
                   Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ALTHEA MARGARET DAILY MILLS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1401 1st Street North in Winter Haven, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Althea Margaret Daily Mills Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Althea 
Margaret Daily Mills Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(B)
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                         BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, Craig R. Jones, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Electro Rent Corporation, on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of the
date first written above.

      Dated August 13, 2004

                                                        /s/ Craig R. Jones
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Craig R. Jones
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                 EXHIBIT 32(B)
<pre>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of The Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB/A, as
amended, of Vote Power Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Dated: February 1, 2005           By: /s/ Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  Authorized Agent/Sole Director
				                          Appointed by Board of Directors
                                  on March 19, 2004

Certification Of The Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section
302 Of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 Q-SB/A, as
amended, of Vote Power Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Dated: February 1, 2005           By: /s/ Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  Authorized Agent/Sole Director
				                          Appointed by Board of Directors
                                  on March 19, 2004
No. 10-5594.

#### Mattie Turner, Petitioner v. Bobbie Edmonds.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 696,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9138.

178 L. Ed. 2d 526,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 324, 178 L. Ed. 2d 210, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7210.
DoD Supply Discrepancy Reporting (SDR) Resource Guide

Ben Breen, 

DoD Supply Discrepancy Reporting Administrator, DEDSO

April 2024

The Nation’s Combat Logistics Support Agency

Warfighter Always

Established 1961

Access to WebSDR may be obtained by completing an online System Access Request (SAR), from the DAAS web site: DAAS (SAR)

WebSDR Submission Application website: DAAS Web Portal (dla.mil)

 WebSDR User Guide:  (Located on SDR PRC Webpage) 

www.dla.mil/dlms-sdr

DAAS WebSDR Help Desk

Help Desk Support:Commercial: (614) 692-6672 or DSN: 312-850-6672Email: ITOC@dla.mil

2

Ben Breen, DEDSOApril 2024

DAAS WebSDR Information

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

3

Ben Breen, DEDSOApril  2024

DoD SDR Resources

Defense Enterprise Data Standards Office (DEDSO)

Defense IT Standards for Business Systems of the DoD Supply Chain

SDR Procedures: DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, Chapter 17

POC DEDSO Program Office: DEDSO.SDR@dla.mil  

DoD SDR Website: www.dla.mil/dlms-sdr

 DEDSO SDR Approved DLMS Change (ADC) Index: www.dla.mil/dlms-adc

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

DoD SDR Information

Please find below the DoD SDR resource user information:

SDR Community initial points of contact for SDR submission questions and issues:

Component specific resources should be the initial touchpoint when addressing process, function, or application issues and questions.

Each Component has Supply, SDR and Small Arms leads that will be the initial touchpoint when addressing Supply, SDR and Small Arms related questions.

Link to component primary and alternate POCs can be found at: www.dla.mil/Defense-Data-Standards/Committees/Contacts/

Component SDR Submitting Systems vary by Component

Users will contact their individual Component leads for support regarding specific SDR applications for the submission of SDRs.

Each Component can provide specific system support and user guide information.

Defense Enterprise Data Standard Office (DEDSO) and DAAS WebSDR support

DEDSO provides SDR DoD level process and business rule support to the individual Component SDR Leads and community as a whole.

DAAS and DAAS WebSDR support the DoD SDR Information Exchange that enables the Component specific SDR applications to communicate between submitters and responders or action activities when SDRs are identified.

4

Ben Breen, DEDSO

April 2024

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

5

Ben Breen, DEDSOApril 2024

Additional Online Resources

DLM Publications 

www.dla.mil/dlms-pubs

Acronyms – DLM Volume 1

www.dla.mil/Defense-Data-Standards/Publications/Vol-1-Concepts/

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

6

Warfighter Always

Warfighter Always

# image7.jpeg

# image5.png

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image6.png