alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LANDAIR
CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) FOR SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                       707
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,671
<PP&E>                                         108,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,412
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (420)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                       481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                755
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       755
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
# 亞裔美國人

English (英語)Español(西班牙語)Korean (韓語)Vietnamese (越南語)

Print

Minus

### 了解吸煙的真相

吸煙會增加您患癌症、心臟病和中風的風險,而這些已是亞裔美國人的主要死亡原因。
            - 每 14 名亞裔美國成年人中約有 1 人吸煙(2%)。*
            - 在亞裔美國成年人當中,男性吸煙比女性更常見。†

#### 更多資料

            - 了解在整體美國及在特定人口中 目前吸煙 的人數百分比。

### 真實故事:*Tips*® 中的亞裔美國人專題

了解那些因吸煙而引致疾病與傷殘的亞裔美國人如何生活的真實故事。

認識 Rico F. Rico,現年 48 歲,居住在加州。Rico 在 45 歲時被確診患有癌症後成功戒煙。作為一名癌症倖存者,他對於能與家人共度時光感到很幸運。

頁頂

###  戒煙協助

            - 要立即開始戒煙,請參閱 如何戒煙 部分中的戒煙指南。要獲取免費戒煙協助,請致電戒煙熱線: 1-800-QUIT-NOW ( 1-800-784-8669 )。戒煙顧問可以回答您的問題,協助您訂立戒煙計劃及提供支援。亦可以透過致電 亞洲吸煙者戒煙熱線 (Asian Smokers’ Quitline, ASQ)獲取以下語言的免費協助:               - 普通話及廣東話: 1-800-838-8917
              - 韓語: 1-800-556-5564
              - 越南語: 1-800-778-8440  下載及列印亞洲語言的戒煙資源:  **您戒煙的原因是甚麼?**                - 中文 [PDF-169kb]
              - 韓語 [PDF-141kb]
              - 越南語 [PDF-238kb]  **您是否有戒煙計劃?**                - 中文 [PDF-379kb]
              - 韓語 [PDF-313kb]
              - 越南語 [PDF-400kb]  **如何控制吸煙旳渴求。**                - 中文 [PDF-455kb]
              - 韓語 [PDF-576kb]
              - 越南語 [PDF-498kb] 

              - 了解吸煙的真相
              - 更多資料
              - 真實故事:*Tips*® 中的亞裔美國人專題
              - 戒煙協助

Rico F.,現年 48 歲,14 歲已開始吸煙。他在 45 歲時被確診患上癌症而決心戒煙,以便可以與家人一起享受健康的生活。自從成功永久戒煙後,癌症倖存者 Rico 一直熱衷於分享自己的故事,來協助其他吸煙者戒煙。Rico 覺得很幸運能夠活著與家人共度時光,並看著他的孩子大學畢業。Rico 認為戒煙永遠不會太遲。

*「作為一名前吸煙者,我知道戒煙有多難。成癮是一場非常難以取勝的戰鬥,但絕非不可能!」*

戒煙治療可能是免費的,或透過保險、健康計劃或診所以減費形式提供。

州政府轄下的公共醫療補助計劃有涵蓋戒煙治療。雖然涵蓋範圍會視乎不同州而有所差異,但所有州都會至少為某些公共醫療補助的參與者涵蓋某些治療。

聯邦醫療保險現時涵蓋每年兩次戒煙嘗試,以及每次戒煙嘗試中最多四次面對面的輔導環節。

*Tobacco Product Use Among Adults – United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020.†Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults—United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2018.

頁頂

February 5, 2024
Office on Smoking and HealthNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention

- Facebook
- Twitter
- LinkedIn
- Syndicate
No. 10-798.

#### Gregory L. Hudson, Petitioner v. Universal Studios, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1181, 131 S. Ct. 1027,

178 L. Ed. 2d 830,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 884.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 291.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00068- CR

Kar l Dean Stahmann, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 274 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR2011 -03 1, H ONO RAB LE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Appellant Karl Dea

n Stahmann’s brief was originally d u e on Marc h 30, 2015. On Aug ust 13, 2015, we g rante d appellant’ s third motion for extension of time and order ed appellant’ s counsel to f

ile a brief by October 9, 2015. We c autioned counsel that no further extensions would be g rante d and that if he failed to file the appellate brief by the deadline, we would ref er the case to the trial court for a hear ing pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Appellant’s counsel has now filed a four th motion for ext ension, reque sting a n additional extension t o J anuar y 11, 2016. Appel la nt’ s fourth motion for extension of time for filing his appellate brief is denied. We abate the cause and rema nd it to the trial court to hold a hear ing in acc ordanc e with rule 38.8 of the Rules of Appellate Procedur e. Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(b)( 2), (3) . The trial c ourt shall conduct a hear ing to deter

mine whether appellant still wishes to pro s ec u t e this appea l, whether appellant is indige nt, and whether counsel has abandone d the appea l. See id
. I f appellant desires to appea l andis indige nt, the trial court should m ak e ap propriate order s to ensure that appellant is adequately

repr esente d on appea l. See id
. A rec ord of the hear ing, including copies o f al l fi n d ings and any order s, shall be forwa

rded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental rec ord no later than Fe bruar y 8, 2016. See id.

Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Abated a nd Remanded Filed: January

8, 2016

2
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2




 


NB MANUFACTURING, INC.


 


TERMINATION CERTIFICATION


 


This is to certify that I do not have in my possession, nor have I failed to return, any devices, records, data, notes, reports, proposals, lists, correspondence, specifications, drawings, blueprints, sketches, materials, equipment, other documents or property, or reproductions of any aforementioned items belonging to NB Manufacturing, Inc., its subsidiaries, affiliates, successors or assigns (together, the "Company").







I further certify that I have complied with all the terms of the Company's At Will Employment, Confidential Information, Non-Competition, and Invention Assignment Agreement (the "Confidentiality Agreement") signed by me, including the reporting of any inventions and original works of authorship (as defined therein), conceived or made by me (solely or jointly with others) covered by that agreement.







I further agree that, in compliance with the Confidentiality Agreement, I will preserve as confidential all trade secrets, confidential knowledge, data or other proprietary information relating to products, processes, know-how, designs, formulas, developmental or experimental work, computer programs, data bases, other original works of authorship, customer lists, business plans, financial information or other subject matter pertaining to any business of the Company or any of its employees, clients, consultants or licensees.







I further agree that for twelve (12) months from this date, I will not hire any employee of the Company, I will not solicit, induce, recruit or encourage any of the Company's employees to leave their employment, and I will not engage in any competitive activities as described in the Confidentiality Agreement.







Date: June 13, 2014                                                              /s/ Michael J. Schifsky


Employee's Signature







 


Michael J. Schifsky
-82 -80 -78 -76

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
#### *Quang Nguyen, Petitioner, v. Port of Seattle Police Dep’t, Respondent,*

No. 91705-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70841-4-1, April 20, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1004. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2964 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2964

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
transition youth as members of targeted groups for purposes of the work 
                          opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

 Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
transition youth as members of targeted groups for purposes of the work 
                          opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improved Employment Outcomes for 
Foster Youth Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FOSTER CARE TRANSITION YOUTH FOR PURPOSES OF WORK 
              OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (I), by 
striking the period at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ``, 
or'', and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) a qualified foster care transition youth.''.
    (b) Qualified Foster Care Transition Youth Defined.--Section 51(d) 
of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(16) Qualified foster care transition youth.--The term 
        `qualified foster care transition youth' means any individual 
        who is certified by the designated local agency as--
                    ``(A) not having attained age 27 as of the hiring 
                date, and
                    ``(B) having been in foster care (within the 
                meaning of section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 
                U.S.C. 677)), after attaining the age specified in 
                subsection (a)(7) of such section.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to individuals who begin work for the employer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-5864.

#### Souksakhone Phaknikone, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1066, 131 S. Ct. 643,

178 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9190.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 1099.
# C_2015279EN.01001502.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mannheim — Germany) — Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR, Jürgen Vogel, Gerhard Vogel

(Case C-242/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Community plant variety rights - Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Derogation provided for in Article 14 - Use by farmers of the product of the harvest for propagating purposes without the holder’s authorisation - Farmers under an obligation to pay equitable remuneration for such use - Period within which that remuneration must be paid in order to be able to benefit from the derogation - Whether it is possible for the holder to have recourse to Article 94 - Infringement))

(2015/C 279/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Mannheim

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

Defendants: Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR, Jürgen Vogel, Gerhard Vogel

Operative part of the judgment

In order to be able to benefit from the derogation provided for in Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights from the obligation to obtain the authorisation of the holder of the plant variety right concerned, a farmer who has planted propagating material obtained from a protected plant variety (farm-saved seed) without having concluded a contract for so doing with the holder is required to pay the equitable remuneration due under the fourth indent of Article 14(3) of that regulation within the period that expires at the end of the marketing year during which that planting took place, that is, no later than 30 June following the date of reseeding.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

---
No. 10-7986.

#### Terrance Gerard Freeman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1031,

178 L. Ed. 2d 852,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 643.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 99.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of the registrant as of
March 14, 2003. Each such subsidiary does business under its corporate name.

List of Subsidiaries

                                                     Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                           Incorporation

EID Corporation                                      Liberia
Ethyl Administration GmbH                            Switzerland
Ethyl Asia Pacific Company                           Virginia
Ethyl Brasil Aditivos Ltda.                          Brazil
Ethyl Canada Inc.                                    Province of Ontario, Canada
Ethyl Europe S.P.R.L.                                Belgium
Ethyl Foreign Sales Corporation                      U.S. Virgin Islands
Ethyl Interamerica Corporation                       Delaware
Ethyl Japan Corporation                              Japan
Ethyl Korea Limited                                  Korea
Ethyl Mineraloel-Additive GmbH                       Germany
Ethyl Petroleum Additives, Inc.                      Delaware
Ethyl Petroleum Additives Limited                    United Kingdom
Ethyl Services GmbH                                  Switzerland
Ethyl Services Limited                               United Kingdom
Ethyl Shipping Company Limited                       United Kingdom
Douglas A Adams

Douglas Adams Photography

1228 Breaside Court

Greenwood, IN 46143

317-881-3349

douglasanthonyadams@gmail.com

douglasadamsphotography.com

January 8, 2016

Petition for Section 333 Exemption

I hereby formally request FAA authorization for Douglas A Adams - dba/ Douglas Adams

Photography (hereafter “PETITIONER”) to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes 

other than for recreation or hobby.

PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to 

operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging. 

PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and without the United States. 

PETITIONER occasionally travels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS in 

accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities.

PETITIONER requests this permission to pursue its use of UAS models including DJI Phantom 2, or 

other similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models.

PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a manner which will minimize risk to the NAS, other 

persons, and property. The following procedures will be followed: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight 

inspection before each flight to examine airworthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from 

commercial specifications except for battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS will not be 

flown over stadiums, sports events, or groups of people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line of 

sight to operator(s) pursuant to Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over 

exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operator will 

perform a preflight visual inspection of the NAS to determine nearby dangers such as low-flying 

manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight 

stability, proper connection to remote control, and proper performance at a very low altitude 

before reaching the NAS, and (9) non-participating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance 

away from the flight path of the UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS 

operator with more than one year of experience.
This petition will benefit the public interest. PETITIONER works with local Contractors and 

Architects to obtain photographs and video that are not readily available for logistical planning and 

project documentation. PETITIONER will provide imagery which is not otherwise possible to be 

captured without the use of a UAV, which will assist companies to which the images may be sold, 

will enhance the public understanding of how projects may impact local streets and roadways

photographed by the UAS, and PETITIONER will be able to provide UAS safety information to those 

with whom he or she comes in contact.

Please grant the requested exemption under Section 333.

Douglas A Adams

dba/ Douglas Adams Photography
#### *State, Respondent, v. McClinton, Petitioner,*

No. 91678-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71701-4-1, April 6, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 826. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-1360.

#### Mujo Mehovic, aka Mujo Mejovic, et al., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 100,

181 L. Ed. 2d 28,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6826.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 546.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3022 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3022

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the reductions 
          in Medicaid DSH allotments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2019

  Mr. Engel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the reductions 
          in Medicaid DSH allotments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Access Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REDUCTIONS IN MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1923(f) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396r-4(f)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraphs (7) and (8); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (7).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1923(f) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4(f)), as amended by subsection (a), is further 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraphs (2), (3), 
        and (7)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (2) and (3)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``paragraphs (6), (7), 
        and (8)'' and inserting ``paragraph (6)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.5
 ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE
(SKECHERS LEASE)
 Assignment th Effective Date Assignor Assignee
 WITNESSETH:
  Assignment and Assumption
 Lease Tenant
  Assignor Representations
   Indemnification




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Successors and Assigns
 (signature page follows)
 2




---



##### 



ASSIGNOR
    
    ASSIGNEEHF LOGISTICS I, LLC, a Delaware limited 
liability company
    
    HF LOGISTICS-SKX T1, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability companyBy: /s/ Iddo Benzeevi
 Iddo
Benzeevi, President and Chief
Executive Officer
    
    By:
    
    HF LOGISTICS-SKX, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, its sole
member
 By:
    
    HF Logistics I, LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company, itsmanaging member
 By:
    
    /s/ Iddo BenzeeviIddo Benzeevi, President andChief Executive Officer
 By:
    
    SKECHERS R.B., LLC, aDelaware limited liabilitycompany, its managing member
 By:
    
    Skechers U.S.A., Inc, aDelaware corporation, itssole member
 By:
    
    /s/ David Weinberg
 David
Weinberg, ChiefOperating Officer
 3
**Exhibit
      10.1**








**Summary
      of Non-Employee Trustee Compensation**





The
      Company pays its Trustees who are not employees of the Company or any of its
      affiliates fees for services as trustees. Trustees receive fees of $6,500 per
      quarter plus $1,400 per Board meeting and an additional $500 fee for each
      telephonic meeting.  The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an
      additional $1,400 per meeting.  The Board of Trustees established a
      Special Committee made up of the 4 non-employee independent
      trustees.  These Special Committee members are eligible to receive a
      flat fee of $70,000 each for their participation on the Special
      Committee.  The Trustees are also reimbursed for all reasonable
      expenses incurred by them in carrying out their duties as Trustees of the
      Company.