alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 22-0630

JOHN BUTLER,

Appellant and 

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,

-vsELINOR SWANSON and DOES 1-20,

inclusive,

Appellee and 

Defendant/Counter Plaintiff.

ELINOR SWANSON,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

-vsJOSEPH FARZAM and JOSEPH 

FARZAM LAW FIRM, a Professional 

Corporation, 

Third-Party Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING 

APPELLANT AND 

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER 

DEFENDANT JOHN 

BUTLER’S 

UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLANT BRIEF

Pursuant to Appellant and Plaintiff/Counter Defendant John Butler’s Motion 

for Extension of Time to file his opening Appellant Brief, and pursuant to Mont. R. 

App., P. 26(1), and noting that Appellee does not object, Appellant is granted a 

thirty-day (30) extension within which to file his Appellant brief. Appellant’s 

Opening Brief shall be due January 13, 2023. 

DATED this _____ day of _______________, 2022.

By:

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 16 2022

11/16/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0630
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB/A of  the Company for the  quarter
ended March 31, 2005 , as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                      /s/   Inti Shaikh
                      ---------------------------
                      Inti Shaikh
                      CEO
                     (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  January 14, 2008



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB/A of  the Company for the  quarter
ended March 31, 2005, as amended,  (the Report) fully complies with  the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                        VOTE POWER CORPORATION
                        /S/ Inti Shaikh
                        ----------------------------
                        Inti Shaikh
                        Secretary/Treasurer
                        (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:  January 14, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135052 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (78) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ALLEN M. HARTMAN, Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of

Mary Lou Hartman,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135052 

 COA: 257536 

St. Clair CC: 02-000445-NH 

PORT HURON HOSPITAL,

FORREST BRYAN FERNANDEZ, 

M.D., and JALAL UD-DIN AKBAR, 

M.D., 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for review of taxation of costs is considered, and 

it is DENIED. 

l0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-611-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 15, 1998, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-611-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.211) for authorization to certificate the existing Carencro Meter 
Station and appurtenant facilities in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, 
constructed under FGT's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
553-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    FGT states that the delivery point is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without deteriment or disadvantage to other customers. The 
proposed delivery point will not have an effect on FGT's peak day and 
annual deliveries and the total volumes delivered will not exceed total 
volumes authorized prior to this request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17885 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Mark, 47 años, California

 ¿Esas cosas que te dicen 

que nunca te van a pasar...?

 ¡Sí pasan!

#CDCConsejos

Mark fumaba y tuvo cáncer de colon. 

Su bolsa de colostomía fue pegada 

alrededor de un orificio en su estómago 

para colectar sus heces. Mark tuvo que 

usar esta bolsa después de la operación que 

le hicieron para extirparle el tumor. 

Mark no sabía que fumar puede causar 

cáncer colorrectal. Ahora usted lo sabe. 

Las pruebas de detección salvan vidas.

Usted puede dejar de fumar. 

LLAME AL 1-855-DÉJELO-YA.
No. 10-6660.

#### Jorge Ayala, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 655,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9148.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Dr. John J. McGrath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.


Dated: May 12, 2005                       /s/ Dr. John J. McGrath
                                          -----------------------
                                          Dr. John J. McGrath
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President
No. 10-1475.

#### John J. Schlabach, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5290.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 306.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP7.21. APPENDIX 7.21**

**DISPOSAL AUTHORITY CODES**

1

APPENDIX 2.21

AP7.21-1

APPENDIX 7.21
No. 10-10815.

#### James Alexander Logan, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 851, 132 S. Ct. 176,

181 L. Ed. 2d 87,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5929.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 64 So. 3d 1271.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00559

- CV

HILL COUNTRY

- SAN ANTONIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. a.k.a. Hill Country Achievement, Appellant

v.

Rachel TREJO as next friend of Rene Trejo, Appellee
From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 20045 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2014

DISMISSED

On February 12 , 2014, this court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s order dated
August 5, 2013. On February 27 , 2014, Appellant filed a mot ion for en banc reconsideration and

thi s court requested Appellee file a response to Appellant’s motion.
On July 22, 2014, Appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(1). Three days later, the Texas Supreme Court granted Appellant’s motion to
dismiss the petition for review. Appellee did not file a response to the en banc motion.04

- 13

- 00559

- CV

On September 23, 2014, we ordered Appellant to clarify whether the July 22, 2014 motion

to d ismiss sought (1) a dismissal of the motion for en banc reconsideration or (2) this court to
withdraw the court’s opinion dated February 12, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(c).
On October 3, 2014, Appellant clarified its request seeking this court withdraw its February
12, 2014 opinion. Appellee’s subsequent response strongly opposed the withdrawal of the court’s
opinion.
Appellant’s request to withdraw this court’s February 12, 2014 opinion is denied.
Appellant’s request to dismiss this appeal is granted and this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,013)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,695
<PP&E>                                          15,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,798)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,729
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,081
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,840)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive License; Unifinancial 
International, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Unifinancial International, Inc. a revocable, 
nonassignable, exclusive license in the United States to practice these 
Government owned inventions in all fields of use except contaminated 
plastic waste abatement on commercial ocean-going vessels, as described 
in:

U.S. Patent Number 5,489,200 entitled Compress/Melt Processor for 
Contaminated Plastic Waste
U.S. Patent Number 5,411,697 entitled Method for Processing 
Contaminated Plastic Waste
U.S. Patent Number 5,488,278 entitled Load Limit System for Mechanical 
Linear Actuator

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than August 31, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Carderock 
Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code 004, 9500 MacArthur Blvd., 
West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dick Bloomquist, Director 
Technology Transfer, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 
Code 0117, 9500 MacArthur Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817-5700, telephone 
(301) 227-4229.

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
Lou Rae Langevin,
LT, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17661 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
No. 10-10216.

#### Anthony J. Ceparano, Petitioner v. Southampton Justice Court, New York, et al.

565 U.S. 831, 132 S. Ct. 129,

181 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5529.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 537.
No. 10-10231.

#### Robert Bertola, Petitioner v. James Hartley, Warden.

565 U.S. 831, 132 S. Ct. 130,

181 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5594,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,310
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (463)
<INVENTORY>                                    765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,760
<PP&E>                                     252,268
<DEPRECIATION>                             (92,106)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             265,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,783
<BONDS>                                    213,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       718
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,841)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               265,691
<SALES>                                     96,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,919
<CGS>                                       75,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              118,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (477)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (38,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (11,811)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (26,508)
<DISCONTINUED>                               8,077
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (18,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (40.110)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (40.110)


</TABLE>
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX) 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

June 05, 20 14

Hon. Miguel Alberto Saldana

Attorney at Law

105 E. 3 rd Street

Weslaco, TX 78 5 96

Hon. Keith C. Livesay

517 W. Nolana

Brazos Suites No. 9

McAllen, TX 78504

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00568

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. C

- 4271

- 13

- B

Style: LA VILLA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES v.

THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN FOR THE CITY OF LA VILLA

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

93 rd District Court

H o n . Laura Hinojosa, Hidalgo County District Clerk

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial R e gion
Exhibit 31.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Fred M. Montano, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB by Falcon Ridge
Development Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Falcon Ridge
Development Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

     4. I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Falcon Ridge
Development Inc. and have:

          i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to Falcon Ridge Development Inc., including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are
     being prepared;

          ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

          iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

     5. I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Falcon Ridge Development Inc. auditors and the audit
committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

          i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s auditors any material weaknesses
     in internal controls; and

          ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
     controls; and

     6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether
or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 15, 2006                       /s/ Fred M. Montano
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Fred M. Montano, Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-1295.

#### Ravidath Ragbir, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 816, 132 S. Ct. 95,

181 L. Ed. 2d 24,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6710.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 80.
### Docket Number FAA **- 2013**  **- 0668** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  1 / 11 / 1 3 **Regional Airline Association** 1/1 1/13 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  1/11/13 **ATA M Lopez**  1/11/13
**DoD 4000.25-2-M**

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP2.7. APPENDIX 2.7**

**CORRECTION/CHANGE CODES FOR STORAGE ITEM RECORDS**

## 

2

**AP2.7-**

AP2.7-1

APPENDIX 2.7
No. 10-11008.

#### Carl Allen Nakagawa, Petitioner v. North Range Behavioral Health.

565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 201,

181 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5995,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.