alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-5438.

#### Jaime L. Dozal-Vargas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1181, 131 S. Ct. 994,

178 L. Ed. 2d 831,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 739.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 512.
# ‘Always an airman’ at 69th Air Force birthday

/ Published Sept. 26, 2016
# C_2016211EN.01001602.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco — Spain) — Mimoun Khachab v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava

(Case C-558/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/86/EC - Article 7(1)(c) - Family reunification - Requirements for the exercise of the right to family reunification - Stable and regular resources which are sufficient - National legislation permitting a prospective assessment of the likelihood that the sponsor will retain his resources - Compatibility))

(2016/C 211/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Mimoun Khachab

Respondent: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1)(c) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification must be interpreted as allowing the competent authorities of a Member State to refuse an application for family reunification on the basis of a prospective assessment of the likelihood of the sponsor retaining, or failing to retain, the necessary stable and regular resources which are sufficient to maintain himself and the members of his family, without recourse to the social assistance system of that Member State, in the year following the date of submission of that application, that assessment being based on the pattern of the sponsor’s income in the six months preceding that date.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

---
December 20, 2023 

Dear Tribal Leader:

We at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) respect and appreciate your leadership in 

protecting the health and well-being of American Indian and Alaska Native people. With this letter, the 

CDC Division of Diabetes Translation (DDT) offers an update on proposed changes to the National 

Diabetes Prevention Program’s (National DPP) Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program Standards and 

Operating Procedures (DPRP Standards). 

The National DPP is a partnership of public and private organizations working collectively to build a 

nationwide delivery system for a lifestyle change program for adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes to 

prevent or delay its onset. This program is based on findings from the landmark Diabetes Prevention 

Program (DPP) and several translation studies that followed. As a result of the vital work of tribes through 

the Special Diabetes Program for Indians (SDPI) and efforts by CDC and partners across the United States, 

the National DPP was established in 2010 to reach individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes, particularly 

those living in communities disproportionately impacted by diabetes. Seventy-four tribal programs 

currently offer the National DPP lifestyle change program and have earned CDC recognition.

Informed by input from participating programs, published literature, and existing DPRP data, CDC revises 

the DPRP Standards every 3 years. Proposed revisions have been approved by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) and published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2023, for a 60-day public 

comment period, ending February 13, 2024, Federal Register: Proposed Data Collection Submitted for 

Public Comment and Recommendations. We encourage you to participate in the public comment 

process. 

Thank you for your interest in and support for the National DPP.

Sincerely,

Christopher S. Holliday, PhD, MPH, MA, FACHE

Director, Division of Diabetes Translation

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
# C_2013274EN.01002002.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/20

---

Action brought on 24 July 2013 — Perfetti Van Melli v OHIM (MARGARITAS)

(Case T-382/13)

2013/C 274/34

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Perfetti Van Melli SpA (Lainate, Italy) (represented by P. Testa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 10 April 2013 in Case R 430/2012-1, in so far as it rejected the application for registration of the trade mark ‘MARGARITAS’ for the following products: confectionery, pastry, sweets, caramels, wine gums, caramel, chewing-gum, gelatine (confectionery), liquorice, lollipops, toffee, pastilles, sugar, chocolate, cocoa. |
| --- | --- |

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 10 April 2013 in Case R 430/2012-1, in so far as it rejected the application for registration of the trade mark ‘MARGARITAS’ for the following products: confectionery, pastry, sweets, caramels, wine gums, caramel, chewing-gum, gelatine (confectionery), liquorice, lollipops, toffee, pastilles, sugar, chocolate, cocoa.

| | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Community word mark ‘MARGARITAS’ for goods in Class 30 — Community trade mark application No 10 261 105

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the word ‘MARGARITA’ is not descriptive; |
| --- | --- |

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the word ‘MARGARITA’ is not descriptive;

| | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the word ‘MARGARITA’ does not describe an essential characteristic of the product; |
| --- | --- |

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the word ‘MARGARITA’ does not describe an essential characteristic of the product;

| | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the term ‘MARGARITAS’ has distinctive character with regard to confectionery products. |
| --- | --- |

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the term ‘MARGARITAS’ has distinctive character with regard to confectionery products.

---
P(i^9^^'^ C^uH-^T^5v»- \}9T-iP5T- Qp^\-\0{^S2 

JFom 

DODGE 

FORT DODGE REGIONAL AIRPORT 

1639 Nelson Avenue, Suite 2 • Fort Dodge, IA 50501 

515.573.3881 - Ext. 3 • fdairport@fortdodgeio\va.org 

November 14, 2011 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE REQUEST FOR C0MIV1ENTS 

Order 2011-9-5 Docket DOT-OST-2001-10682 

:-o 

an 

-'-• : ^ . 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Fort Dodge Airport Commission extends our support for the proposal submitted by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. with a 

few suggestions and requests. 

In June 2010, Delta/Mesaba improved our services by offering direct flights and a better time schedule. In exchange 

for this improvement, we agreed to lose one daily flight. The market's support for this change was reflected in the 

increased utilization by our businesses and community. Enplanements were up by 50% at the end of 2010 and are up 

another 43% through the end of October 2011. Mason City's proposal by Great Lakes offers four daily flights compared 

to three per day for Fort Dodge. Comparing Mason City with Fort Dodge after both were reduced to two daily flights-the 

enplanements were comparable. Therefore, we feel justified in requesting four daily flights to continue the increased 

utilization of the air service from Fort Dodge. Additionally, it's important that Great Lakes Aviation agree to maintain a 

competitive fare pricing with close proximity airports, along with agreeing to maintain similar completion standards to 

those we enjoy with Mesaba Airlines. 

We are grateful and commend the cooperation of efforts between Delta and Great Lakes that will provide the users of 

our region continued seamless worldwide connectivity by offering an interline and ticketing arrangement, participation in 

the Delta SkyMiles frequent flyer program, and booking capability on Delta.com. All of these elements are extremely 

important as customer determine what airport and airline to use. The direct flights proposed by Great Lakes-with a 

reasonable time schedule-are another important element to utilization. The proposed quality air service is desirable and 

its usage will fulfill the intended expectations of EAS program. 

Thank you for allowing our community adequate time to gather comments regarding the proposals submitted;' We 

have had great interest and communication within the community. We feel that the majority of the support is for 

Great Lakes Aviation, if their service is similar to the professional, reliable, and competitive air service we have 

experienced with Mesaba/Delta. 

Richard Jacobsor/ 

Airport Commission Chairman 

Cc: Delta Airlines 

Great Lakes Airlines 

Senator Charles Grassley 

Senator Tom Harkin 

Congressman Tom Latham 

Greater Fort Dodge Growth Alliance 

Airport Commission 

Mayor Matt Bemrich and Council Members, City of Fort Dodge 

City Manager David Fierke 

Iowa Department of Transportation-Office of Aviation 

Fort Dodge Chamber of Commerce
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SCOTT A. ANDREWS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3719 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 569 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1990).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# Oklahoma City’s Queen recognized at annual DLA award ceremony

/ Published Jan. 4, 2016
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Bikki Queen, secretary for the Preservation, Packaging, Packing, and Marking Branch at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., was chosen to receive one of the top Ten Outstanding DLA Personnel of the Year awards for 2015.

DLA director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, along with Distribution’s commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix was on hand to present the award during a ceremony on Dec. 10.

Queen primarily performs administrative duties, maintaining over 4,000 evidential documents according to audit readiness protocols. Using records management, she focuses on logging, reviewing and filing more than 480 letters of memorandum and more than 720 administrative reports. Additionally, she facilitates quick retrieval of over 1,000 various required proofs of training.

“Ms. Queen meticulously reformatted, filed and maintained more than 2,000 personnel forms and folders and professionally handled over 5,800 emails and telephone calls, as well as scheduled over 200 meetings during the calendar year,” said DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., director Ned J. LaViolette.

In addition to her daily duties, Queen served as the Combined Federal Campaign coordinator, ensuring 100 percent contact was achieved.  She designed and revamped over 50 spreadsheets for ease of interpretation. Furthermore, she actively participates in and supports all command Voluntary Protection Program endeavors. 

“Ms. Queen’s demonstrated professionalism, enthusiasm and attention to detail have made her an integral part of the DLA Distribution Oklahoma City team, “explained LaViolette. “She is most deserving of recognition as one of the Ten Outstanding DLA Personnel of the Year Award.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                            1,054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>            1,825
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                  4,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>      17,425
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>           11,552
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>             11,576
<LOANS>                          37,072
<ALLOWANCE>                         853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   73,904
<DEPOSITS>                       58,410
<SHORT-TERM>                          0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>               1,509
<LONG-TERM>                         400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                       13,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   73,904
<INTEREST-LOAN>                   2,240
<INTEREST-INVEST>                 1,290
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    194
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  3,724
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                1,824
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,850
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>             1,874
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                    0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                   1,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     548
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          548
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                        431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                     6.97
<LOANS-NON>                         964
<LOANS-PAST>                        271
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                   1,551
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    853
<CHARGE-OFFS>                         0
<RECOVERIES>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   853
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                217
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>             636
        


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2961 

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit 

of the Samish Indian Nation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. COOK, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. GALLEGO, 

Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Ms. MOORE, Mr. GOMEZ, 

Mr. RUIZ, and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust 

for the benefit of the Samish Indian Nation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Samish Indian Nation 

5 Land Reaffirmation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2961 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF TRUST LAND STATUS AND AC2 TIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The decision dated November 9, 

4 2018, and the actions taken by the Bureau of Indian Af5 fairs Northwest Regional Director to approve the applica6 tion of the Samish Indian Nation to take approximately 

7 6.70 acres of land into trust as described in the decision 

8 for the benefit of the Samish Indian Nation are ratified 

9 and confirmed. 

10 (b) APPLICATION.—This Act shall apply to all claims 

11 (including claims challenging the validity of title or the 

12 effectiveness of any action of the Secretary acquiring and 

13 taking land into trust) pending on the date of the enact14 ment of this Act or filed on or after the date of the enact15 ment of this Act. 

16 (c) RETENTION OF FUTURE RIGHTS.—Nothing in 

17 this Act alters or diminishes the right of the Samish In18 dian Nation from seeking to have any additional land 

19 taken into trust by the United States for the benefit of 

20 the Samish Indian Nation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ David R. Asplund

David R. AsplundChief Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2008
EXHIBIT 23




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in E'town Corporation's 
Registration Statement No. 33-56013 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-49812, 
33-44210 and 33-42509 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated February 15, 
1996 and to the incorporation by reference in Elizabethtown Water 
Company's Registration Statement No. 33-19600 on Form S-8 of our report 
dated February 15, 1996, appearing or incorporated by reference in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of E'town Corporation and Elizabethtown Water 
Company for the year ended December 31, 1995.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 28, 1996
Parsippany, New Jersey
# C_2016145EN.01000701.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen v Jovanna García-Nieto, Joel Peña Cuevas, Jovanlis Peña García, Joel Luis Peña Cruz

(Case C-299/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement of persons - Citizenship of the Union - Equal treatment - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 24(2) - Social Assistance - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Articles 4 and 70 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Exclusion of nationals of a Member State during the first three months of residence in the host Member State))

(2016/C 145/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen

Appellant:

Respondents: Jovanna García-Nieto, Joel Peña Cuevas, Jovanlis Peña García, Joel Luis Peña Cruz

Respondents:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC, and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010, must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State under which nationals of other Member States who are in a situation such as that referred to in Article 6(1) of that directive are excluded from entitlement to certain ‘special non-contributory cash benefits’ within the meaning of Article 70(2) of Regulation No 883/2004, which also constitute ‘social assistance’ within the meaning of Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 19.9.2014.

1

---
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1164 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-075-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 10-1476.

#### City of Santa Cruz, California, et al., Petitioners v. Robert Norse.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5640.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 966.
**DAAN-13-04**

**Master Solicitation with Additional Clauses**

(March 2017)

In addition to the clauses/notes contained herein, the Purchase Order clauses/notes are applicable as indicated in the DLA Master Solicitation for EProcurement Automated Simplified Acquisitions (Part 13), per the Revision and Date in effect at the issuance of this award. The 

DLA Master Solicitation may be found on the Web at http://www.dla.mil/HQ/Acquisition/Offers/eProcurement.aspx.  

(End of Notice)