T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J A M E S R I C A R D O M A C A W A L A N G ; HE S T Y V E R ON I C A T I WA, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71155 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 362- 904

A 096- 362- 905 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry11, 2013 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , T A S H I M A , a n dW A R D L A W , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J a m e s R i c a r do M a c a w a l a ng a nd H e s tyV e r oni c aT i w a , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of Indo nesi a, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) o r d e rd is m is s in g th e irap p e a l f r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g th e ir



# FI LED FEB 15 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71155 2 appl i c a t i ons f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e B I A ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nyi n pa rta nd di s m i s s i n pa rtthe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e d en y p et i t i o n ers’ p en d i n g m o t i o n s t o t ak e j u d i ci al n o t i ce o f m at eri al s o u ts id e th e a d m in is tr a tiv e r e c o r d . Se e Fis h e rv . I NS , 79 F . 3d95 5, 96 3 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 6 ) ( e n b a n c ) ( th is c o u rt’s r e v ie w is lim ite dto th e a d m in is tr a tiv e r e c o r d ) . W i th r e s pe c tt o M a c aw a l a ng’ s a s y l um c l a i m , a nd T i w a ’ s w i thhol di ng of re m ov al cl ai m , subst ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s det erm i nat i on that M a c a w a la n g a n dT iw af a ile dto e s tab lis h th e ye x p e r ie n c e dp a s t p e r s e c u tio n in I n d o n e s ia . See W

a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1059- 60 ( “ be i ng a c c os t e d byathr e a t e ni ng m o b ” w h i l e d ri v i n g w as d i scri m i n at o ry m i streatm en tb u td i dn o tco n st i tu t e p ast pers ec ut i on ). S ub st ant i alevi dence al so supp ort s the B IA ’ s f i nd i ng that , even un der adi s f a vor e d gr oup a na l y s i s , M a c a w a l a ng f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h aw e l l - f ounde d f e a rof pe r s e c ut i on a nd T i w af

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nottha ts he w i l l be pers ec ut ed i n Ind on es i a, because they di d n otdem on stra t e s uffi ci enti nd i vi du al i ze d r is ko f p e r s e c u tio n . See H

al i m v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d9 7 1 , 9 7 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ;11- 71155 3 W a kka ry , 55 8 F . 3d at10 66 (“ [a ] n app l i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al w i l l need to a d d u c e ac o n s id e r ab lyla r g e rq u a n tu m o f in d iv idu a liz e d - r is ke v id e n c e ” ) . W e r e j e c tpe t i t i one r s ’ r e que s ttha tthe c ourtr e c ons i de ri t s s t a nc e r e ga r di ng apa tt e rn or pr a c t i c e of

pe r s e c ut i on. A c c or di ngl y , both M a c a w a l a ng’ s a s y l um c l a i m a nd T iw a ’s w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im f

a il. B e c au s e M a c a w a la n g d idn o t e s tab lis h e lig ib ilityf o ra s y lu m , it n e c e s s a r ily f ol l ow s tha the c a nnotm e e tthe he a vi e rbur de n of qua l i f y i ng f orw i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 4 5 3 F .3 d1 1 8 2 , 1 1 9 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . W i th r e s pe c tt o T i w a ’ s a s y l um c l a i m , the r e c or d doe s notc om pe l the c onc l us i on T i w ae s t abl i s he d c ha nge d ore xtr a or di na ryc i r c um s t a nc e s t o e xc us e the d e la yin f

ilin g h e ra s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 20 8. 4(a) (4)- (a )( 5); R am adan v. G on zales , 47 9 F . 3d 64 6, 65 7-58 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per c uri am ). W e l ac k ju risd icti o n to co n sid erw h eth erth e f ac t th at T iw a w as li sted o n h erh u sb an d ’s as yl um appl i ca t i on const i tut es an extra ordi naryci rc um st ance excusi ng her u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n , b e c au s e s h e d idn o t r a is e th is a r g u m e n t to th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 5 8 F . 3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). W e rej ectp et i t i o n ers’ c ha l l e nge t o thi s c ourt ’ s de c i s i on i n T am pu bo lon v. H

older , 5 9 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . See A vagyan v. H older , 64 6 F . 3d67 2, 67 7 (9th C i r. 20 11 ) ( “ [a ] three j udge pa ne l c a nnotr e c ons i de rorove rrul e c i r c ui tpr e c e de ntunl e s s a n i nt e rve ni ng11- 71155 4 S up re m e C ou rtdeci si on un derm i nes an exi st i ng prec edentof the N i nth C i rc ui t ”) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n a n dc ita tio n o m itte d ) . A c c o r d in g ly , T iw a ’s a s y lu m c la im f a ils . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew pet i t i on er s’ C A T cont ent i on s, because p e titio n e r s f

a ile dto r a is e th e m to th e B I A . Se e B arr on , 3 5 8 F .3 da t 6 7 8 . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.