alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF EDWARD M. MANDEL, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nexplore Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  June 12, 2007 | /s/   EDWARD M. MANDEL     
|-------------------- | ---------------------------
|                     | Edward M. Mandel           
|                     | Principal Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# C_2013129EN.01002102.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/21

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — Calestep v ECHA

(Case T-89/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - Fees and charges payable to ECHA - Reduced fees granted to small enterprises - Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise - Decision ordering the recovery of the uncollected amount of the total fees payable - Application for suspension of operation of the decision - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/43

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Calestep (Estepa, Spain) (represented by: E. Cabezas Mateos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, A. Iber and C. Jacquet, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the payment reminders of 23 January and 8 February 2013 addressed by ECHA to the applicant on the ground that it did not meet the conditions to benefit from the reduction of fees provided for small enterprises.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Approved DLMS Change 83 

Revision to DS 511R to Identify Ordered By Activity

1. ORIGINATOR:

Sponsor: Supply Process Review Committee, Ellen Hilert, Co-Chair, DLA J-673, Defense 

Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO), 703-767-0676 (DSN 427), 

ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil

2. FUNCTIONAL AREA: Supply

3. REQUESTED CHANGE:

a. Title: Revision to DS 511R to Identify Ordered By Activity

b. Description of Change: This change revises a 511R DS DLMS note for qualifier OB in 

the table 2 N101 segment for clarification and to expand its functionality to identify the original 

requisitioner when a Management Control Activity is identified as the transaction From activity. 

In addition to the above 511R DS change, DAAS conversion maps for the DS 511M and the 869F 

are revised to always populate the OB Ordered By activity when the transaction From activity is 

other than the requisitioner. The transaction submitter will be carried in header/address loop and 

the Ordered By activity will be reflected in the detail data. (This requires no change to the 511M 

or 869F DSs.)

c. Procedures: Revise DLMS Supplements as indicated. 

Location Revision Reason Federal IC 

1 2/N101/180 Revise DLMS note for qualifier “OB” to read:

DLMS Note: 1.Use to identify the 

requisitioner when the 1/N1/070 uses Code ZL 

(Party Passing the Transaction) or Code Z5 

(Management Control Activity) to identify the 

transaction originator.

2. DLMS enhancement: see introductory note 

3A. Required entry for DLSS/DLMS 

conversion to support BSM.

Required to support 

DLA BSM.

No Federal Change 

Required 

d. Alternatives: None identified

4. REASON FOR CHANGE: This administrative change supports DLMS implementation 

and desired functionality. The DLA BSM implementation under SAP requires the identification 

of an “ordered by’ activity. During conversion processing, the DAAS populates this field using 

the requisition document number DODAAC.

5. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES:

a. Advantages: Supports DLMS implementation
b. Disadvantages: None identified.

6. IMPACT: 

a. Publications. Revised DS 511R Requisition.

b. DAAS mapping changes for DS 511R, 511M and 869F. Corresponding changes to 

DLA BSM changes required
No. 10-10735.

#### Melecio M. Cardona, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 847, 132 S. Ct. 165,

181 L. Ed. 2d 79,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6596.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                Able Energy, Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Able Energy,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Christopher P. Westad,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able  Energy,  Inc.  and will be retained by Able  Energy,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: May 17, 2004



/s/ Christopher P. Westad
----------------
Name: Christopher P. Westad
Title: Chief Financial Officer
### NU M BER 13- 07- 0029 8-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG
SCH LU M BER GERT ECH NOL OGY COR PORA

TION A ND JOH N TH OM AS M UR PHY , A pp ellan ts,
v . OTILA C UEL LA R, IND IVIDU A LLY A ND AS R EPR ESEN TA TIVE OF T HE ESTA TE OF R UD OLP H GON ZA LE Z, DEC EASED , A pp ellee.

On ap pe al f rom th e 1 05 D istrict Co urt th 

### of K leb erg Co un ty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e Just i ces Yañez, G ar za and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am This ca se is before the Cou rt on a joi nt moti on to dis mis s the appeal

. The par ti es hav e reache d an ag re ement w it h reg ard to the d is posi ti on of the matters c ur re ntl y on app eal. T he p arties request th is Court set aside the trial court’s j udgm ent w ithou t regard2

to th e me rits and rem and the case to the trial court for renditio n of judgmen t in accorda nce w it h the par

ti es’ ag re ement. W it hout pass ing on the mer it s o f the c ase, we s et as ide the tria l court’s judgmen t and REMAND this case to the trial court for f urthe r proceed ings i n acc ordance w it h the par ti es’ ag re ement. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1( a) (2 )( B) , 43. 2( d)

. The par ti es’ j oin t moti on to di smi ss i s g ra nted, and the a ppeal i s h ereby D ISM ISSE D. In ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the par ti es, each par

ty i s O RD ER ED to bear thei r ow n c ost s. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 15th day

of Janua ry , 200 9.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,717,473
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    162,267
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         340,653
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       676,693
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,897,086
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      825,540
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            163,884
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 989,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,000
<PREFERRED>                                    220,072<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,271,961
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   50,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     28,407
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,912
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,313,310
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,897,086
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,176,825
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            85,364
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     869,382
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     954,746
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        222,079
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              24,563
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 246,642
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        96,782<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,860
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,045
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  145,815
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       281,015
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       88,478
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         281,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Includes Preference Stock of $9,464
<F2>Includes Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend
    Requirements of $7,921
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries
Parsippany, New Jersey

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.33-63515) of Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries of
our report dated May 20, 2005, except Note 6, as to which the date is June 27,
2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries, which appear in this Form
10-K.



                                                     /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                     --------------------


New York, New York

June 29, 2005
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, October 23, 2015*

*Change 5*

**AP4. APPENDIX 4**

**WEB FUND CODE MASTER FILE LAYOUT**

AP4.1.  Layout for SFIS Fund Code to Fund Account Conversion Table.  The Type column identifies the data type and, when applicable, the maximum number of characters in parentheses.  For the Use column: M = Mandatory, O = Optional, and C = Conditional.

AP4.2.  Layout for Fund Code to Billed Office DoDAAC Table (Applicable to Signal Codes C or L).  The Type column identifies the data type and, when applicable, the maximum number of characters in parentheses.  For the Use column, M = Mandatory.

1

APPENDIX 1

AP4-8	APPENDIX 4
COVS-NoticeofRescission-SARAmendmentjune12








NOTICE OF RESCISSION
OF AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
To:  [Recipient Name] (Employee Number:  nnnnn)
Dated:  June 17, 2014
Reference is made to the Stock Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) dated [Date] between you and Covisint Corporation (the “Corporation”) pursuant to which the Company granted to you a stock option to purchase [#shares] shares of the Corporation’s common stock (“Shares”) at $[price] per share, upon the terms and conditions contained therein and in the Covisint Corporation 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as amended by that certain amendment dated May 8, 2014 pursuant to which the Corporation added a “tandem” Stock Appreciation Right (the “Tandem SAR Amendment”).  Pursuant to this Notice of Rescission, the Corporation hereby rescinds the Tandem SAR Amendment in its entirety, effective as of the initial effective date thereof, such that the Tandem SAR Amendment shall have no force or effect whatsoever and shall create no rights or obligations whatsoever of one party against the other and the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as if such Tandem SAR Amendment had not occurred.   
Nothing herein shall be held to alter, vary or otherwise affect the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Option Agreement, except as noted above.
Very truly yours,
COVISINT CORPORATION


By: _____________________
       Michael A. Sosin
       Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

11
15033976.1
# rnc
# C_2013291EN.01000702.xml

| 5.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/7

---

Action brought on 9 August 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-76/13)

2013/C 291/08

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision considering the applicant ineligible for the call for expressions of interest CAST/02/2010 and rejecting the PMO’s request for a member of the contract staff to be recruited.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the decision of the AECE of 8 November 2012 considering the applicant ineligible for the call for expressions of interest CAST2010 and refusing to offer him a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the contract staff for function group III (FGIII); |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the decision of the AECE of 8 November 2012 considering the applicant ineligible for the call for expressions of interest CAST2010 and refusing to offer him a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the contract staff for function group III (FGIII);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-10452.

#### Mark E. Wallace, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5948.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Table 1 HCP

# Table 2 HCP Direct Contact

# Table 3 Tdap type

# Table 4 HPV Age at 1st dose

# Table 5 Summary RE diff

# Table 6 Avg change RE diff
No. 10-6894.

#### In re Askia S. Ashanti, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1107, 131 S. Ct. 827,

178 L. Ed. 2d 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9821.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
#### *In re Det. of Pettis,*

No. 91876-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45499-8-II, June 4, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 198. *Denied*December 4, 2015.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

IN REPLY
REFERTO DLMSO

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Standard Financial Information Structure (SFIS)/Defense Logistics
Management Standards (DLMS) Transactions Working Group Meeting of
November 4, 2008

The attached minutes of the Standard Financial Information Structure
(SFIS)/Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS) Transactions Working Group
Meeting are forwarded for your information and appropriate action. The next meeting
will be scheduled at a later date.

The Defense Logistics Management Standards Office point of contact is Robert
Hammond, 703-767-2117 or email Robert.Hammond@dla.mil.

adel CZ (Ap

ONALD C., PIP!

Director

Defense Logistics Management
Standards Office

“y

Attachment

DUSD (L&MR) SCI
SFIS/DLMS Working Group
Attendees


DLMSO

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: Standard Financial Information Structure (SFIS)/Defense Logistics
Management Standards (DLMS) Transactions Working Group Meeting of November 4,
2008

Purpose: Defense Logistics Management Standards Office (DLMSO) hosted the subject
working group meeting at Fort Belvoir, VA. Specific discussion topics are noted below. A list
of attendees is shown at Enclosure 1.

Brief Summary of Discussion: Bob Hammond, Finance PRC Chair facilitated the
discussion. The meeting focused on the process for modifying DLMS transactions to carry SFIS
data elements to support SFIS compliant systems. The intent is to identify changes to DLMS
now, so that systems can program for them as future enhancements. It is noted that many current
financial systems are not DLMS compliant and have no current plans to migrate, so the legacy
data elements of signal code, fund code and bill-to DODAAC will continue to be carried in the
DLMS transactions to support mapping to non-DLMS compliant systems. To support SFIS,
changes will be required to many DLMS transactions in the areas of requisitioning, billing and
others to be determined, Since data must be present in the requisition to be perpetuated to the bill
the initial focus will be on the DLMS 511R Requisition.

Action: BTA will draft a Proposed DLMS Change (PDC) to modify the 511R. Approved
DLMS Change 274 is a good example of the format and content needed for the PDC. The PDC
should contain text update for the DLMS manual and a listing of the proposed SFIS data
elements with the data construct, definition, cross-walk to existing data elements, and
explanation for why each data element is needed in the 511R, in order to facilitate review by
Components and Agencies.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1852
SYED M. A. HASAN, Petitioner, versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review Board. (02-121; 02-ERA-18-ALJ) Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed M. A. Hasan, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associate Solicitor Fair Labor Standards, Paul L. Frieden, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Joan Brenner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Syed M. A. Hasan, a pro se petitioner, requests review under 42 U.S.C. § 5851(c)(1) (1995) of the Energy Reorganization Act of a final order issued by the Administrative Review Board of the United States Department of Labor (the “Board”), affirming the Recommended Decision and Order of the administrative law judge and dismissing Hasan’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hasan v. United States Dep’t of Labor , Nos. 02-121, 02- ERA-18-ALJ (U.S.D.O.L. June 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Vaccinations among Adults

The Trend tab shows vaccination coverage trends for multiple geographies across multiple years. Select one Vaccine, one or more Geographies, 

one Age Group, one Race/Ethnicity Group and one or more Survey Years to view coverage estimates.

Estimates are not available for all vaccines in all geographies and all survey years.

Hover to see 

specific

vaccination 

coverage 

estimates.

Right click to see 

estimates in table 

format.

Slide the 

Coverage bar to 

expand data.

Options under Select 

an Age Group are 

dependent on the 

vaccine selected. Ex. 

Additional age 

groups appear in 

Select an Age Group 

if TDAP is selected

under Select a 

Vaccine.
The Multi-Dimension Trend tab shows vaccination coverage trends across multiple dimensions. Select one Vaccine, one Geography, one or more

Age Groups, one or more Race/Ethnicity Groups and one or more Survey Years to view coverage estimates. 

Hover to see 

specific vaccination 

coverage 

estimates.

Right click to see estimates in 

table format.

Slide the 

Coverage bar to 

expand data.
The State Map tab shows vaccination coverage estimates across multiple geographies for a single vaccine, dimension, and survey year. Select 

one Vaccine, one or more Geographies, one Age Group, one Race/Ethnicity Group and one Survey Year to view coverage estimates.

Hover to see 

additional coverage 

estimates.

Hover over a 

state on the map

to see additional 

information.

When selecting a 

Region, the map will 

highlight only the 

states, cities, and/or 

territories that are in

region. Oversampled 

regions vary by year and 

are not associated with 

an HHS Region.

Click legend 

group to 

highlight 

specific 

states/cities.

Click City & Territory 

Abbreviations for 

additional information.
The County Map tab shows vaccination coverage estimates by county. Select one Vaccine, one or more states, one Age Dimension, and one 

Survey Year to view coverage estimates.

Click legend 

group to 

highlight 

specific 

states/cities.

Hover over a 

state on the map 

to see additional 

information.
The Data Table tab shows vaccination data in a table format. Upon arriving on this tab, the table will be blank. Make selections using the 

dropdown filters on the left. Select one or more Vaccines, Geographies, Ages, Race/Ethnicity Groups and Survey Years to view data.

The Data Notes tab provides information about the data, methodology, and contact information.

Click a table header to 

sort the list by the 

specific topic.
No. 10-10457.

#### Glenn Ford, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6394.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Same case below, 57 So. 3d 297.