Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search

		Submit


Transportation Safety


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Saturation Patrols										Related Pages
										On This Page
			Effectiveness and UseRecent or Current LegislationCosts and Time to ImplementOther Issues and ResourcesHistoryReferences
		
A saturation patrol is an increased number of police officers patrolling a specific area to look for impaired driving behavior, especially at times and in locations where impaired driving is more common. Saturation patrols are also called blanket patrols or dedicated driving while impaired (DWI) patrols.1 When implemented fully, saturation patrols are well publicized and regularly conducted.1 Just like sobriety checkpoints, the goal of saturation patrols is to increase the perceived likelihood that impaired driving will be identified and penalized, leading to a reduction in impaired driving.1 Saturation patrols are sometimes used when sobriety checkpoints are restricted by state or local laws.2
Effectiveness and Use of High-Visibility Saturation Patrols
One study examined associations between impaired driving prevention enforcement and the rate of self-reported alcohol-impaired driving by state.3 Rates of impaired driving were significantly lower in states that conducted saturation patrols.3 This relationship held for enforcement at both the state and local levels.3
Evaluations of saturation patrol programs in the Midwest have demonstrated that they can be effective. An evaluation of Minnesota’s NightCAP program using 1991–2005 data found an indication that patrols were reducing rates of alcohol-related fatal or severe injury crashes.4 However, the evaluation concluded that more patrols, better patrol visibility, and more associated advertising were needed to improve the impact of the patrols.4 A 2002–2003 demonstration program in Michigan consisted of weekly enforcement accompanied by some publicity, with an additional three mobilization blitzes with paid media.5 An evaluation of the program found that extensively publicized saturation patrols can be effective in reducing alcohol-related fatal crashes. The program saved an estimated 57 lives in one year.5 In contrast, an analysis of 2013–2017 data from the City of Los Angeles found that while the week following a sobriety checkpoint had a decrease in alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes, no daily, weekly, or monthly effects were found for saturation patrols.6 The authors suggest this is because of the higher visibility of sobriety checkpoints.6
A 2010–2011 survey of law enforcement agencies in the United States found that 96% of state and 63% of local law enforcement agencies had conducted at least one saturation patrol in the past year.7 In the same survey, only 35% of state law enforcement agencies had conducted saturation patrols weekly or daily in the past year.7 Similarly, a 2012–2014 survey of law enforcement agencies in the United States found that 98% of state, 89% of municipal, and 84% of county law enforcement agencies conducted saturation patrols.8 Of the state law enforcement agencies who perform saturation patrols, 38% conducted them daily or weekly.8
Recent or Current Legislation by State
Saturation patrols are legal in all jurisdictions.1
Costs of High-Visibility Saturation Patrols and Time to Implement
The two main costs to implement saturation patrols are law enforcement personnel and paid publicity.1 Publicity is essential to the success of saturation patrols. Some publicity may come from earned media like news stories, but paid media like radio ads may be necessary and can be costly.1
If officers are already trained in detecting impaired drivers and conducting standardized field sobriety tests, saturation patrols can be implemented within 3 months.1
Other Issues and Resources
You can read Chapter 1, Section 2.2 of NHTSA’s Countermeasures that Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide for State Highway Officespdf iconexternal icon (Tenth Edition, 2020) to learn more about the topics above or other issues related to saturation patrols, such as publicity and arrests.1
More information about saturation patrols is also available in NHTSA’s Increasing impaired-driving enforcement visibility: Six case studiespdf iconexternal icon.9
You can read the RAND Corporation’s final reports for MV PICCS 1.0/2.0external icon and MV PICCS 3.0external icon for more information about how effectiveness and costs were incorporated into the MV PICCS tool for this intervention.
History
In the 1980s, alcohol-impaired driving gained attention in the United States with the advocacy of citizen organizations, advances in the collection of data about alcohol-involved crashes, and legislative changes.10 Throughout the decade, impaired driving enforcement changed, including the addition of roadside use of hand-held preliminary breath test devices and an increase in sobriety checkpoints and saturation patrols.10
A law enforcement bulletin from 2003 suggests that saturation patrols have been in use longer than sobriety checkpoints and have had a variety of names.11 For example, Minnesota began implementing its saturation patrol program called Operation NightCAP (Concentrated Alcohol Patrol) in 1998.4
References
Venkatraman, V., Richard, C. M., Magee, K., & Johnson, K. (2021). *Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasures guide for State Highway Safety Offices*. (Report No. DOT HS 813 097). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-09/15100_Countermeasures10th_080621_v5_tag.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). *Getting to zero alcohol-impaired driving fatalities: A comprehensive approach to a persistent problem*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24951/getting-to-zero-alcohol-impaired-driving-fatalities-a-comprehensive-approachexternal icon
Sanem, J. R., Erickson, D. J., Rutledge, P. C., Lenk, K. M., Nelson, T. F., Jones-Webb, R., & Toomey, T. L. (2015). Association between alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and alcohol-impaired driving. *Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78*, 104–109. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457515000676external icon
Creaser, J. I., Aflleje, W., & Nardi, F. (2007). *Evaluation of Minnesota’s Operation NightCAP program*(MN/RC 2007-29). HumanFIRST Program, ITS Institute, University of Minnesota https://www.lrrb.org/pdf/200729.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
Fell, J., Langston, E. A., Lacey, J. H., & Tippetts, A. S. (2008). *Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan*(Report No. DOT HS 810 941). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/810941.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
Morrison, C. N., Ferris, J., Wiebe, D. J., Peek-Asa, C., & Branas, C. C. (2019). Sobriety checkpoints and alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes at different temporal scales. *American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56*(6), 795–802. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379719300753external icon
Erickson, D. J., Farbakhsh, K., Toomey, T. L., Lenk, K. M., Jones-Webb, R., & Nelson, T. F. (2015). Enforcement of alcohol-impaired driving laws in the United States: A national survey of state and local agencies. *Traffic Injury Prevention, 16*(6), 533–539. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429770/external icon
Eichelberger, A. H., & McCartt, A. T. (2016). Impaired driving enforcement practices among state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States. *Journal of Safety Research, 58*, 41–47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437516300767external icon
Fell, J., McKnight, A. S., & Auld-Owens, A. (2013). *Increasing impaired-driving enforcement visibility: Six case studies*. (Report No. DOT HS 811 716). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/pdf/811716.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
Hedlund, J., & McCartt, A. (2002). *Drunk driving: Seeking additional solutions*. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety https://web.archive.org/web/20160417145110/https://www.aaafoundation.org/sites/default/files/DrunkDriving-SeekingAdditionalSolutions.pdfpdf iconexternal icon.
Greene, J. (2003). Battling DUI: A comparative analysis of checkpoints and saturation patrols. *FBI Law Enforcement Bullletin, 72*(1), 1–6. https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/jan03leb.pdf/viewexternal iconTop of Page
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  February 22, 2022					Content source: 	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control homeTransportation Safety
Data and Resources for States and Tribesplus icon
LINCS Guide
State Data Linkage Systems
Cost Data and Prevention Policiesplus icon
Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS)plus icon
Intervention Fact Sheets
Intervention Glossary
Costs of Crash Deaths
Child Passenger Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
What Works: Strategies to Increase Car Seat and Booster Seat Use
Publications
Resources
Booster Seat Planning Guide
Seat Beltsplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Increase Restraint Use
Publications
Policy Impact
Teen Driversplus icon
Get the Facts
Parents Are the Key
GDL Planning Guide
Publications
Older Adult Driversplus icon
MyMobility Planplus icon
Resources
Spanish Resources
Related Pages
Medicines Risk Fact Sheet
Impaired Drivingplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Reduce or Prevent Alcohol-Impaired Driving
Increasing Alcohol Ignition Interlock Use
Publications
Distracted Driving
Pedestrian Safetyplus icon
Publications
Tribal Road Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
Roadway to Safer Tribal Communities Fact Sheets
Best Practices Guide
Program Evaluation Guide
Publications
Motorcycle Safety
Bicycle Safetyplus icon
Publications
Global Road Safetyplus icon
Publications & Resources To receive email updates about this topic, enter your email address: Email Address			What's this?				Submit


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue