alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Emerson Radio Corp., (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Duncan Hon, Chief Executive
Officer, and Andrew L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



By:

/s/ Duncan HonDuncan HonChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Andrew L. DavisAndrew L. DavisChief Financial Officer


Dated: July 30, 2012

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILE copie

ZED RULS
MAY 92
JSUPSYSCOM WASHINGTON DCr ral

CDRMICOM REOSTONE

z

MCL G- SSP.
ADELPHIA
AMB- SPCC MECHANICS
MATSUPEO MECH
MRSA LEXINGTON
CAMERON STA
DAYTON OH

sey gee

VA TQ PROVIDE ASSISTANCE
LIDATION@ CANCELLATION PROBLEM WITH

Ore

REGUESTED COR AMC

REQUISITION VA

CONTROL POINT

CDRMRSA “1 SAPR9Z

GAAS 14APRO2

BLSSp 14 R32

IS TELCON BETWEEN NAVSUP 112) CDR BURNETT AND CDRMRSA
MR RICHARDS DURING REF 8 AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO

DAAS INSERT MATERIAL CONTROL ACTIVITY MCA) ROUTING IDENTIFIER

RIC) ALPHA EIGHT GNE N RECORD POSITION (P} 74-76 TO PREVENT

CANCELLATION OF ARMY REQNS WITHOUT A VALIO RIC. REF C (ELCON
WEEN NAVSUP 112A) MS. FRENCH AND DAASO WLL) MR. STRICKLERI)
NP TRMED THAT DASSO WOULD MA&FE APPROPRIATION PROGRAM CHANGES, REF D

CON BETWEEN NAVSUP (112A) MS. FRENCH AND DLSSD (OLSS-D) MS
GE} APPROVED DAASO PROGRAM CHANGES

1 REQUISITION CANCELLATION PROB
ECTEG IN THE NEAR TERM BY DAAS IN
> EN RP 74 THRU 76, WHEN AN

M ADDRESSED BY REF A WILL BE
ca NG MCA RIC ALPHA EIGHT ONE
REQUISITION IS RECEIVED WITHOUT

2

BIC GR WITH A RIC OTHER THAN Aga OR ASE THE LONG-TERM
SOLUTION WILL BE NAVY S REL PLANNED PROGRAM CHANGES WHICH ARE
SCHEDULED FOR | OCT 92 RELEASE

DISCUSSED REFS B THRU D. DLSSD WILL APPROVE DAAS PROGRAM
CHANGE LTR REQUEST FORWARDED SEPCOR DAAS PROGRAMMING WILL BE
COMPLETED BY 15 MAY $2
3 POINT GF CONTACT: MS Haw 4i1iC, OSN 327-9267

435 0 NNNN

SUS DUPE INCL ASSIEIEN
#### *State, Respondent, v. Crosby, Petitioner,*

No. 91700-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44866-1-II, April 14, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1001. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
Order filed, October 30, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00690-CR

____________

CORDERO JARREAL STEVENSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1299880

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 23, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Mary Ann Rodriguez, the official court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 10-10051.

#### Yaser A. Albahri, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 830, 132 S. Ct. 127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5773.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 51 So. 3d 467.
No. 10-1329.

#### William DeLuccio, et al., Petitioners v. Ed Havill, et al.

565 U.S. 816, 132 S. Ct. 96,

181 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6758.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 43 So. 3d 925.
No. 10-6212.

#### Mark Berrios, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1012, 131 S. Ct. 526,

178 L. Ed. 2d 387,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8524.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2196

DEMETRA MILLADGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00194-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: June 30, 2015 Decided: July 22, 2015

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Teresa Burke Wright, Meredith F. 

Bergeson, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demetra Milladge appeals from the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment in favor of OTO Development, LLC, in her 

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and 

the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Milladge v. OTO Development, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00194-CMHJFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### *State, Respondent, v. Lozano, Petitioner,*

No. 92148-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45242-1-II, July 28, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 117. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
State ofLouisiana 2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS Designation Recommendations Designated Area Designation

AQCR 019: Monroe-El Dorado Interstate Caldwell Parish Catahoula Parish Concordia Parish East Carroll Parish

Franklin Parish

Grant Parish La Salle Parish Madison Parish Morehouse Parish

OuachitaParish Richland Parish

Tensas Parish Union Parish West Carroll Parish AQCR 022: ShreveportTexarkana-Tyler Interstate Avoyelles Parish Bienville Parish

Bossier Parish Caddo Parish Claiborne Parish De Soto Parish Jackson Parish Lincoln Parish Natchitoches Parish Rapides Parish Red River Parish

Sabine Parish Vernon Parish Webster Parish

Winn Parish AQCR 106: S. Louisiana-S.E. Texas Interstate Acadia Parish Allen Parish Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unc[assifiable Unclassifiable Designation

Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Designation

Unclassifiable UnclassifiableState ofLouisiana 2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS Designation Recommendations Ascension Parish Unclassifiable Assumption Parish Unclassifiable Beauregard Parish Unclassifiable

Calcasieu Parish Attainment 

### AQCR 106: S. Lottisiana-S.E. Designation Texas Interstate (cont.) Cameron Parish East Baton Rouge Parish East Feliciana Parish

Evangeline Parish IberiaParish Iberville Parish Jefferson Davis Parish Jefferson Parish Lafayette Parish Lafourche Parish Livingston Parish

Orleans Parish Plaquemines Parish Pointe Coupee Parish

St. Bernard Parish 

### St. Charles Parish St. HelenaParish St. James Parish 

### St. John the Baptist Parish St. Landry Parish St. Martin Parish St. 

### Mary Parish St. Tammany Parish Tangipahoa Parish Terrebonne Parish Vermilion Parish Washington Parish WestBaton Rouge Parish West Feliciana Parish Unclassifiable Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unc!assifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable

Attainment Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Attainment Unclassifiable Unclassifiable

Attainment Unclassifiable
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3141 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3141

 To limit the collection of annual premiums under the FHA program for 
 mortgage insurance for single family housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2019

 Mr. Phillips introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the collection of annual premiums under the FHA program for 
 mortgage insurance for single family housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Loan Affordability Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL PREMIUMS.

    Paragraph (2) of section 203(c) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1709(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``For any'' and 
                inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (D), for any''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``For any'' and 
                inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (D), for any'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking ``In addition'' and 
        inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (D), in addition''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) The Secretary may not collect any annual 
                premiums under this paragraph with respect to a 
                mortgage at any time that the remaining insured 
                principal balance (excluding the portion of the 
                remaining balance attributable to the premium collected 
                under subparagraph (A)) is 78 percent or less than the 
                lower of (i) the sales price of the dwelling at the 
                sale in connection with which the mortgage was made, or 
                (ii) the appraised value of the dwelling at the time of 
                the origination of the mortgage.''.
                                 <all>
```
AAM-11-241-E April 8, 2011

Exemption No. 10236 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0287

Mr. Eric Chase

President Mansfield Heliflight, Inc.

159 Catamount Drive Milton, VT 05468

Dear Mr. Chase:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 16, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Mansfield Heliflight, Inc. (Mansfield Heliflight), for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Mansfield Heliflight, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Mansfield Heliflight.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Mansfield Heliflight Inc., an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Mansfield Heliflight, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Mansfield Heliflight are subj ect to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Mansfield Heliflight part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
# C_2013344EN.01006201.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/62

---

Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Boston Scientific Neuromodulation v OHIM (PRECISION SPECTRA)

(Case T-497/13)

2013/C 344/114

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. (Valencia, United States) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 May 2013 given in Case R 2099/2012-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 May 2013 given in Case R 2099/2012-5;

| — | Declare Community trade mark application 009725912 to be eligible for registration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Community trade mark application 009725912 to be eligible for registration; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PRECISION SPECTRA’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 10 — Community trade mark application No 9 725 912

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partially refused the CTM application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of 7(1)(b), (c) and 65(2) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
*June 2001 DRAFT*

DoD 4000.25-2-M

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.17. APPENDIX 3.17**

**REPLY TO LOGISTICS TRANSFER/ DECAPITALIZATION FOLLOW-UP**

## 

**AP3.17-**

AP3.17-1

APPENDIX 3.17
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
J. Per Brodin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Claires Stores, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|             |  |  |  |                        
|------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|May 27, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Per Brodin      
|             |  |  |  | J. Per Brodin          
|             |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-640.

#### Eduard Shlahtichman, Petitioner v. 1-800-Contacts, Inc.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1007,

178 L. Ed. 2d 828,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 885.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 794.
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB/A  of  Vote
Power Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  September 30,
2006 (the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities
as Chief Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 14, 2008            By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   CEO and
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### *State, Petitioner, v. Jones, Respondent,*

No. 89321-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 41902-5-II, June 4, 2013, 175 Wn. App. 87. Petitioner’s petition for review *granted*and respondent’s request for review *granted*December 2, 2015.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of BDC Capital, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the *“Report”* ),
      I,
      David R. Pomije, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 135)), that
      to
      my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








Date: January
      16, 2007





/s/
      David R.
      Pomije


David
      R.
      Pomije


Chief
      Executive Officer