alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement of Escalade, Incorporated (Company) on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475 and 333-52477) of our report dated March 10, 2008, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of
December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 29, 2007, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 10, 2008, on our audit of
the internal control over financial reporting of the Company as of December 29,
2007, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

|                    | 
|------------------- | 
|/s/ BKD, LLP        | 
|                    | 
|BKD, LLP            | 
|Evansville, Indiana | 
|March 10, 2008      | 

---
No. 10-10060.

#### Jose Daniel Cardenas-Covarrubias, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 830, 132 S. Ct. 128,

181 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5280.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 769.
# C_2014039EN.01002301.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/23

---

Action brought on 20 November 2013 — alfavet Tierarzneimittel v OHIM — Millet Innovation (Epibac)

(Case T-613/13)

2014/C 39/40

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: alfavet Tierarzneimittel GmbH (Neumünster, Germany) (represented by: U. Bender, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Millet Innovation SA (Loriol sur Drome, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 6 September 2013 (Case R 1253/2012-4) in such a way that the opposition is rejected, and |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 6 September 2013 (Case R 1253/2012-4) in such a way that the opposition is rejected, and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘Epibac’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 31 — Community trade mark application No 6861124

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Millet Innovation SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word marks ‘EPITACT’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 10

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-562.

#### Alyson J. Kirleis, Petitioner v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.

562 U.S. 1137, 131 S. Ct. 925,

178 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 277.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-9601.

#### Jose Parks, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 829, 132 S. Ct. 125,

181 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5898.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 620 F.3d 911.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Able Energy Inc. (the "Company"), on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Gregory D. Frost, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Steven M. Vella, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.


/s/ Gregory D. Frost
--------------------
Gregory D. Frost
Chief Executive Officer
December 8, 2005


/s/ Steven M. Vella
-------------------
Steven M. Vella
Chief Financial Officer
December 8, 2005


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able Energy Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David D, ClarkName:

David D. ClarkTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 15, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to SunCom Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by SunCom Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of SunCom Wireless, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or
after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
No. 10-1335.

#### Michael Ahan, Petitioner v. Nader Modanlo.

565 U.S. 817, 132 S. Ct. 97,

181 L. Ed. 2d 26,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6850.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 194 Md. App. 723 and 194 Md. App. 732.
EXHIBIT 11.2

                       ETHYL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
          COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
              for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
                     (In thousands except per share amounts)



     On October 2, 1997, the Company completed the repurchase of 34,999,995
shares of the Company's outstanding common stock with the purchase price and
related costs totalling about $328.9 million. On February 29, 1996, the Company
completed the acquisition of the worldwide lubricant additives business of
Texaco Inc., ("Texaco") including manufacturing and blending facilities,
identifiable intangibles and working capital. As a result of the aforementioned
stock repurchase and business acquisition, the Company believes that the
following pro forma financial information is important to enable the reader to
obtain a meaningful understanding of the Company's results of operations. The
pro forma information is provided to present a summary of the results of the
Company as if the stock repurchase had occurred as of January 1, 1996 and the
Texaco acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 1996. The pro forma data is for
informational purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the results of
operations of Ethyl had the stock repurchase occurred on January 1, 1996 and had
the acquired business operated as part of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



                                                            1997        1996
                                                          -------     -------

Pro forma net income (1)                                  $67,555     $81,024
                                                          =======     =======

Average number of shares of common stock outstanding (2,3) 83,449      83,444
                                                          =======     =======

Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share              $0.81       $0.97
                                                          =======     =======

Notes:

(1)  In the periods presented, the Company had only one class of common stock
     outstanding.

(2)  To determine the average number of shares of common stock and common stock
     equivalents, the average number of common shares and common stock
     equivalents outstanding (actual or assumed for equivalents) during each
     month were added together and the sum was then divided by 12.

(3)  For diluted earnings per share, the shares issuable upon the assumed
     exercise of outstanding stock options would be 7 and 4 in 1997 and 1996,
     respectively, and the shares of common stock equivalents would have been
     83,456 and 83,448, respectively.










                                       54
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, January, 2006*

*Change 1*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.16. APPENDIX 8.16**

**DISPOSAL RELEASE ORDER CONFIRMATION OR SUPPLY STATUS**

AP3.16-2

2

APPENDIX 3.16

AP8.16-1

APPENDIX 8.16
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3094 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 South Orange 

Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. SOTO (for himself, Mrs. DEMINGS, and Mrs. MURPHY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 

South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL PULSE MEMORIAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Pulse Memorial located at 

5 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, is 

6 hereby designated as the ‘‘National Pulse Memorial’’. 

7 (b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memo8 rial designated by this section is not a unit of the National 

9 Park System and the designation of that national memo10 rial shall not be construed to require Federal funds to be 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3094 IH

1 expended for any purpose related to the national memo2 rial. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

## *DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

# AP2.9. APPENDIX 2.9

**INFORMATION INDICATOR CODE**

*DoD 4000.25-7-M, December 2003*

## *DoD 4000.25-7-M, March 2004*

DLM 4000.25, Volume 4, April 11, 2012

84

	APPENDIX 2.9

AP2.9-1	APPENDIX 2.9

1

84

	APPENDIX 2.9

79

	APPENDIX 2.9
No. 10-7548.

#### Rudolph George Stanko, aka Rudy Stanko, Petitioner v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

562 U.S. 1131, 131 S. Ct. 948,

178 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 569.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 849.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                       ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                                 (In thousands)

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 2004           2003            2002           2001           2000
                                              ---------      ---------       ---------      ---------      ---------
                                              (Restated)     (Restated)      (Restated)     (Restated)     (Restated)
<S>                                           <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Income from continuing
     operations before income taxes            $40,395         $41,363        $37,034        $73,452        $ 36,408

Fixed charges (1)
     Interest expense                           17,339          11,995          7,122          7,663           8,124
     Amortization of debt issuance cost             56             703            167            178             116
     Interest included in rental expense         2,894           2,398          2,164          2,035           1,957
                                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------

         Total                                  20,289          15,096          9,453          9,876          10,197

Earnings (2)                                   $60,684         $56,459        $46,487        $83,328        $ 46,605

Ratio of earnings available to cover
     fixed charges                                 3.0             3.7            4.9            8.4             4.6
</TABLE>

(1)   Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt
      issuance cost plus that portion of lease rental expense representative of
      the interest factor.

(2)   Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes
      plus fixed charges.
<PAGE>   1

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q




[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 1, 1997

                                       OR
[ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 333-23667

                               Mid-State Trust VI
          (Issuer in respect of Mid-State Trust VI Asset-Backed Bonds)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

             Florida                                        59-0945134
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. Employer or organization)
incorporation Identification No.)

        c/o First Union National Bank, 401 S. Tryon Street, 12th Floor,
                            Charlotte, NC 28288-1179
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (704) 383-9568

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court.

Yes    X          No


<PAGE>   2

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.           Financial Statements

         (a) See the quarterly Payment Date Statement attached hereto reflecting
      the required information for the APRIL 1997 payment to the Mid-State Trust
      VI Asset-Backed Bonds.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.           Exhibits

          (a) Quarterly Payment Date Statement of Mid-State Trust VI
      Asset-Backed Bonds relating to the APRIL 1, 1997 Payment Date.



<PAGE>   3

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                First Union National Bank, as Indenture Trustee
                                And on behalf of Mid-State Trust VI

Date: October 30, 2000          By:   /s/  ROBERT ASHBAUGH
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    ROBERT ASHBAUGH
                                    Vice President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6475** 

JOSE FAUSTO GUZMAN

- SOTO , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 00388

- LO

- JFA )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Jose Fausto Guzman

- Soto, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jose Fausto Guzman

- Soto seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court deni es relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independen tly reviewed the record and conclude that Guzman

- Soto has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 27, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the the Form 10-K), I, Robert D.
George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January 8, 2007



By:

/s/ Robert D. GeorgeRobert D. GeorgeVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000764403
<NAME> E'TOWN CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  507,858,478
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 13,601,191
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      32,170,074
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    41,526,372
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             595,156,115
<COMMON>                                   137,930,646
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (3,844,809)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         42,994,743
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             177,080,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,000,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       193,673,528
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          27,000,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             185,372,007
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              595,156,115
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  108,398,105
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         7,611,389
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  75,206,068
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  82,817,457
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     25,580,648
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           2,225,597
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              27,806,245
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    11,697,712
<NET-INCOME>                                16,108,533
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    813,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               15,295,533
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    14,740,342
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   11,696,183
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      19,247,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.14
        


</TABLE>