Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circumstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 60163 Su m m ar yC al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee
v. J O H N N YB RA D B E R R Y , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt fo rth e N o r th e r n D is tr ic t o f M is s is s ip p i U SD C N o. 4: 05- C R

- 77- 2
B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P RA D O , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * J o h n n yB r a d b e r r ya p p e a ls th e 6 0 -m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e du p o n h is r e vo c at i o n o f

pr o ba t i o n f

o r hi s c o nvic t i o n o f c o ns pir ac y t o po s s e s s w i t h t he i nt e nt to d is tr ib u te le s s th a n 5 0 k ilo g r a m s o f c o c a in e . B r a d b e r r ya r g u e s th a t h is sentence i s un reasona bl e becau se th e di st ri ctcourtconsi dered h i s arr estrec ord an d contem p t c h a rg es i n vi ol ati on of U
. S
. S
. G
. §§ 4A 1. 2 an d 4A 1. 3, t h e court fai l ed to provi de ad equ ate reasons f or the sentence, the extent of t h e devi ati on fr o m th e re c o m m e n d e d r a n g e is s ig n ific a n t, a n dth e d is tr ic t c o u r t im p r o p e r ly United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D December

17, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 60163

2 consi dered a fact or of w h i ch B radb erry w as not provi dedadv an ce notice. Bra dbe r r y al s o a r gue s t hathi s duepr o c e s s r i ght s w e r e v i o l at e d b e c aus e t he sen ten ce w a s p red eterm i n edbythe distri ct cou rt. B radb erry di d not argu e bef ore th e di st ri ctcourtt h at th e courtw as barred fr o m co n s i d e r i n gh is a r r e s t r e c o r do rco n te m p t c h a r g e s . T h e r e fo r e , re v ie w is lim ite dto p la in e r r o r . See P u cket t v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 1 2 9 S . C t. 1 4 2 3 , 1 4 2 9 (2 0 0 9 ). T o show pl ai n error , B radb erry m u st show a f orf ei t ed er ror t h at i s cl ear or o b v io u s a n dth a t a ffe c ts h is s u b s ta n tia l rig h ts . S eeP u ck ett , 129 S. C t . at1429. If t h e app el l an tm ak es s u ch a s h ow i n g, t h i s c ou rtha s th e di scr et i on t o cor rect th e e r r o rb u t o n lyif it s e r io u s lya ffe c ts th e fa ir n e s s , i n te g r ity , o rp u b lic rep u tati on of j u d i ci a lpr oce ed i n gs . I d. The r e a r e no b i ndi ng Se nt e nc i ng G u id e lin e s fo rre v o c a tio n o f p r o b a tio n o rs u p e rv is e dre l e a s e . Uni t e d S t at e sv. Head ri ck , 963 F
. 2d7 77 , 7 80
- 82 ( 5th Ci r . 1 99 2)
. Rat he r , t he Se nt e nc i ng G u i del i n es i n cl u de n on - bi n di n g pol i cy st atem en t s c on cerni n g revocat i on s. S eeG u id e li n e s M a n u a l C h . 7 , P t . Aa n d P t . B , in t r o . c o m m e n t . B r a d b e r r y ’s ar gum e ntt hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur ti m pr o pe r ly consi de r e d hi s a r r e s tr e c o r d a nd c o nt e m ptc har ge s i s w i t ho utm e r i tb e c aus e iti s no tc l e art hatt he pr o hibit i o ns l i st ed u n der §§ 4A 1. 2 an d 4A 1. 3 ap pl y t o sentences i m posed u pon revocat i on of pro bat i on. Th e c our t di d noti m pos e a n upw ar d depar t ureunder § 4A 1. 3. See Uni t e d St at e sv . Mat he na , 2 3 F .3 d8 7 , 9 4 n .1 3 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ). T h e di st ri ctcourtprovi ded a d e q u ate r eason s f or th e i m posi t i on of B r a d b e r r y ’ s s e n te n c e . T h e c o u r t re fle c te do n B r a d b e r r y ’ s cr im in a l h is to r y , h is num e r o us v i o l at i o ns o f pr o ba t i o n, a nd h i s c o nt e m pt f o r t he pr o ba t i o n o f

f i c e . The c o u r t’s s ta te m e n t is s u f f ic ie n t a n dd o e s n o t c o n s tit u te p la in e r r o r . S ee Un i t ed St at e sv . Te ran , 98 F
. 3d831 , 836 ( 5th C i r. 199 6)
. M oreove r, t h e di st ri ctcourt c o ns i de r e d the G ui de l i ne s o rpo l i c y s t at e m e nt s o f Chapt e r7 b e f

o r e de t e r m i ni ng t h at t he fac t s o f

t he i ns t antc as e w ar r ant e d as e nt e nc e o f 6 0 m o nt h s. Bra db e r r y’ s s e nt e nc e , w hil e i n e xc e s s o f t he 5- 11 m o nt h r ang e i ndi c at e d b y t he pol i c y s t at e m e nt s , w as w i t hi n t he 60
- m o nt h s t at ut o r y m ax i m um t e r m ofN o. 09- 60163

3 im p r is o n m e n t t h a t t h e d is t r i c t c o u r t c o u ldh a v e im p o s e d
. S ee1 8 U. S
. C. §§ 3559( a) , 3565( a) ; 21 U
. S. C
. §§ 841, 846. Bra db e r r y r e c e ive d a de qua t e no t i c e o f a l la l l e ge d v i o l at i o ns b utf o rt he posi t ive m ar ij uana t e s t . The di s t r i c t c o ur t ’ s r e as o ns f o r t he i m po s i t i on of B r adber r y’ s se nt enc e w as bas ed o n se ver alfac t or s, ev en e xc l udi ng t he pos i t ive m a r ij u a n ate s t . F in a ll y , itis u n c le a r t h a t t h e d is t r ic tc o u r tv io la t e dB r a d b e r r y ’s
r i ght s b y c aut i o ni ng hi m a bo utt he i m po s i t i o n o f t he s t at ut o r y m ax i m um s e n te n c e s h o u ldh is p r o b a tio n b e re v o k e d
. T h e r e fo r e , B r a d b e r r y ’ s s e n te n c e is n e ith e ru n r e a s o n a b le n o rp la in lyu n r e a s o n a b le , a n dh e h a s n o t s h o w n p la in e r r o r . S eeP u ck ett , 1 2 9 S . C t. a t 1 4 2 9 ; Un i t ed S t ate s v. Hi n son , 429 F. 3d 114, 120 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 5 ). Ac c o r d i n g ly , t h e j u d g me n to f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.