alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2910 

To provide that an order by the Secretary of the Interior imposing a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall not take effect unless a joint resolution 

of approval is enacted, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2019 

Ms. CHENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide that an order by the Secretary of the Interior 

imposing a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall 

not take effect unless a joint resolution of approval is 

enacted, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FOR ORDER BY 

4 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR IMPOSING A 

5 MORATORIUM ON FEDERAL COAL LEASING. 

6 An order by the Secretary of the Interior imposing 

7 a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall have no force 

8 or effect unless— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2910 IH

1 (1) the Secretary submits to Congress the pro2 posed order; and 

3 (2) a joint resolution that approves the order is 

4 enacted within 30 legislative days after the proposed 

5 order is received by Congress. 

6 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF MORATORIUM ON COAL LEASING. 

7 Secretarial Order 3338, issued by the Secretary of 

8 Interior on January 15, 2016, shall have no force or ef9 fect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EERE-2008-BT-TP-0007 COMMENT 22

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON TEST PROCEDURES FOR FLUORESCENT LA'vIP

BALLASTS"" STA'\DBY MODE

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avellue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Room 8£-089

february 2, 2009

Purpose

The Department is holding this public meeting to discuss tlle notice of proposed rulemaking on

test procedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts in standby mode. This meeting is intended to

familiarize interested stakeholders with DOE's statutory requirements and proposed test

procedures and provide an opportunity for public comment.

Agenda

10:30 - IO:35nm Welcome

10:35 -11:00 am Introductions, and Agenda Review

11 :00 - II:15 am Ol)cning Remarks

11: 15 - 11:30 am Regulatory HistOf)' and Interpretation of Active Mode, StlUldby

Mode. and Off Mode

11:30 - 11 :45 am Scope of Applicability

11:45 - 12:00 <1m Standby Mode O,'erview

12:00 -12:15 am New Test Conditions for :\'Ieasuring Standby Mode Power

12:15 am -12:30 am Test Procedure Measurements and Burdens

12:30 - 12:45 am Othcl'lssues and Comments; Closing Remarks

12:45 am Adjourn
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary D. Black, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)        The report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Gary D. Black       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Gary D. Black            |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

Date: April 24, 2008

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Janus Capital Group Inc. and will be retained by Janus CapitalGroup Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
# C_2013141EN.01002302.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/23

---

Action brought on 2 March 2013 — Evonik Oil Additives v OHIM — BRB International (VISCOTECH)

(Case T-138/13)

2013/C 141/42

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evonik Oil Additives GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BRB International BV (Ittervoort, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 December 2012 in Case R 907/2012-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 December 2012 in Case R 907/2012-5;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: BRB International BV

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘VISCOTECH’ for goods in Classes 1 and 4

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national and international word marks ‘VISCOPLEX’ for goods in Classes 1 and 4

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was upheld and the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Attachment 

Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 23-01 Meeting (October 19, 2023) 

Current as of November 14, 2023 

Supply PRC 23-01 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/SupplyPRC

No Reference Action Item Responsibility Target 

Due 

Date 

Status Notes 

1. Supply PRC 23-

01 Minutes, Topic 

1, DLA ADC 

1244B 

Implementation 

Strategy Updates 

WMS needs all testing 

partners to reach out to 

Ms. Fowles at WMS to 

ensure testing is 

effective. Interoperability 

testing is vital before 

production environment. 

DEDSO to send a 

coordinating email to 

trading partners to 

ensure the points of 

contacts are made 

available. Status: 

Closed. 

DEDSO ASAP Closed As of 10/19/2023, 

DEDSO sent email 

with key personnel 

copied to ensure all 

points of contact were 

in receipt of Ms. 

Fowles’ email and 

were made aware that 

she is to be contacted 

for interoperability 

testing. 
Attachment 

Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 23-01 Meeting (October 19, 2023) 

Current as of November 14, 2023 

Supply PRC 23-01 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/SupplyPRC

No Reference Action Item Responsibility Target 

Due 

Date 

Status Notes 

2. Supply PRC 23-

01 Minutes, Topic 

2, Army ADC 

1244B 

Implementation 

Strategy Updates 

Mr. Rafael Gonzalez 

inquired of the Army, 

when will Logistics 

Modernization Program 

(LMP)/Global Combat 

Support System (GCSS) 

be ready for testing. Mr. 

Oliver Pryor recorded as 

an action to discuss 

internally before 

providing a response to 

Mr. Gonzalez. 

Army/Mr. 

Oliver Pryor 

ASAP Open 

3. Supply PRC 23-

01 Minutes, Topic 

6, Wrap Up/Action 

Items 

SOCOM is a trading 

partner that DEDSO 

requested to start being 

included in 

Implementation Status. 

The point of contact is 

Ms. Sonia Sanders, who 

sent an email to DEDSO 

Supply 10/19/23. 

DEDSO ASAP Closed DEDSO sent a copy of 

ADC 1244B for Ms. 

Sanders to 

disseminate internally 

and decide whether 

SOCOM is an 

applicable trading 

partner.
# C_2014052EN.01004702.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/47

---

Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Banco de Sabadell and Banco Gallego v Commission

(Case T-704/13)

2014/C 52/91

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Banco de Sabadell, SA (Sabadell, Spain) and Banco Gallego, SA (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to the decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to the decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

| — | annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-130-1020-00;GP8-0087]

Notice of Meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.

ACTION: Meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council; 
February 20, 1998, in Spokane, Washington.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council 
will be held on February 20, 1998. The meeting will convene at 8:00 
a.m., at the Spokane District Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 
1103 N. Fancher, Spokane, WA 99212. The meeting will adjourn at 
approximately 4:00 p.m. or upon completion of business. Public comments 
will be heard from 11:00 a.m. until 11:30 a.m. If necessary to 
accommodate all wishing to make public comments, a time limit may be 
placed upon each speaker. At an appropriate time, the meeting will 
adjourn for approximately one hour for lunch. The purposes of the 
meeting are to interact with the Director of the Bureau of Land 
Management in a video teleconference with other Resource Advisory 
Councils, to identify issues for the Council to address in 1998, and to 
schedule future 1998 meetings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Hubbard, Bureau of Land 
Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 North Fancher Road, Spokane, 
Washington, 99212; or call 509-536-1200.

    Dated January 21, 1998.
Joseph K. Buesing,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-1881 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
```
No. 10-1358.

#### Brad R. Johnson, Petitioner v. City of Kankakee, Illinois, et al.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 99,

181 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6898.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 238.
Si hubiese una 

vacuna contra 

el cáncer, 

¿se la pondría 

a sus hijos?

La vacuna contra 

el VPH previene 

el cáncer.

Consulte a su médico 

sobre cómo vacunar 

a sus hijos e hijas de 

entre 11 y 12 años 

contra el VPH.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens

Distributed by:

CS249586-J
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VIII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending  Sept. 30, 2004   (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
February 4, 2005
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/18/2011 11:07 AM

Subject: RE: Checking in on the CO NAAQS

Thanks Heidi. I'm happy to schedule some time to tomorrow to talk about the comments, if we receive 

them early enough today that we can consider them. I want to make sure we have enough time to 

discuss the internally before meeting with you. We can aim for a meeting later tomorrow afternoon if you 

think we'll receive the comments early this afternoon. Thanks a lot.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37882-37883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at

[[Page 37883]]

the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express 
their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or 
to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not 
later than July 29, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Patricia Lee Joseph, Munster, Indiana; to acquire additional 
voting shares of First Bancshares, Inc., Highland, Indiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Centier Bank, Whiting, Indiana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. David Lawrence Blaine, Paducah, Kentucky; to acquire additional 
voting shares of Ballard Kevil Bancorp, Inc., Kevil, Kentucky, and 
thereby indirectly acquire The Kevil Bank, Kevil, Kentucky.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Ronald F. Tanner, Cornville, Arizona, and Rex K. Alexander, 
Tulsa, Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of BOC Banshares, Inc., 
Chouteau, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Bank of Commerce, Chouteau, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 9, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18743 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lime Energy Co. and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ David R. Asplund

David R. AsplundChief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2008
#### *State, Respondent, v. Mitchell, Petitioner,*

No. 92139-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72222-1-I, June 29, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1034. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
# C_2013325EN.01004801.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/48

---

Action brought on 13 September 2013 — Schmidt Spiele v OHIM (Representation of a games board)

(Case T-492/13)

2013/C 325/77

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Schmidt Spiele GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by T. Sommer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 July 2013 in Case R 1767/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 July 2013 in Case R 1767/2012-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs;

| — | Set a date for the oral procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set a date for the oral procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the representation of a games board for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 10 592 103

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Protect Your Family from 

Tuberculosis! 

You’ve been sick for 


more than 3 weeks...
 

Tuberculosis is 


contagious. 


If you have these 


symptoms, visit 


the doctor today!
 

Cough with phlegm 

for more than 

3 weeks 

Fever Weight 

loss 

Night 

sweats 

Cough with 

blood 

Tuberculosis 

can be cured. 

Health Center 

If you need treatment, it 

can be low cost or free. All 

your information is private. 

For more information go to www.cdc.gov/tb/ 

or call:
# C_2014045EN.01003802.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/38

---

Action brought on 25 November 2013 — The Tea Board v OHIM — Delta Lingerie (Darjeeling)

(Case T-627/13)

2014/C 45/67

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Tea Board (Calcutta, India) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Delta Lingerie (Cachan, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 1387/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 1387/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Darjeeling’ for goods and services in Classes 25, 35 and 38 — Community trade mark application No 9 468 521

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community collective trade mark registration No 4 325 718 of the word mark ‘DARJEELING’ for goods in Class 30; Community collective trade mark registration No 8 674 327 of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘DARJEELING’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-11041.

#### Develae Paige, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 206,

181 L. Ed. 2d 110,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5974.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 871.