alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (the Registrant) that the Quarterly Report of the Registrant
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ William L. Stephens              
|                        |  | William L. Stephens                  
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Lawrence Safarek                 
|                        |  | Lawrence Safarek                     
|                        |  | Vice President and Treasurer         
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
LANDAIR CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) FOR
JUNE 30, 2000 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       815
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,808
<PP&E>                                         108,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,104
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (305)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    807
<INCOME-TAX>                                       311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       496
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
No. 10-10855.

#### Stephen R. Sanchez, Petitioner v. Debra Herndon, Warden.

565 U.S. 853, 132 S. Ct. 181,

181 L. Ed. 2d 91,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6021.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                            DeGolyer and MacNaughton
                               One Energy Square
                              Dallas, Texas 75206


                                 March 25, 1997



ENSERCH Corporation
300 South St. Paul Street
Dallas, Texas 75201

Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the references to our firm and to our reserves
estimates in the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) of ENSERCH
Corporation (the Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1996.  Our
estimates of the oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and natural gas reserves
of certain properties owned by the Corporation are contained in our report
entitled "Report as of January 1, 1997 on Reserves of Certain Properties owned
by Enserch Exploration, Inc. "  References to us and to our estimates are
included in the sections "Business - Natural Gas and Oil Exploration and
Production - General, and - Recent Developments - Core Areas, and - Offshore
Activities" and "Properties" in Part I of the Annual Report and in Note 12 of
the "Notes to Financial Statements" in the Annual Report. Additionally, we
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Corporation's
Registration Statements Nos. 2-59259, 2-77572, 33-40589 and 33-47911 on Form S-
8, Nos. 33-15623, 33-52525 and 33-61635 on Form S-3 and No. 333-12391 on Form S-
4 of such references made in the Annual Report.

                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
No. 10-11159.

#### Louis David Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Chad Charles, et al.

565 U.S. 805, 132 S. Ct. 378,

181 L. Ed. 2d 5,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6557.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner *6unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
*DoD 4000.25-2-M, December 2006*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.42. APPENDIX 3.42**

**REPLY TO MATERIEL RECEIPT FOLLOW-UP PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT SOURCE**

## 

AP3.46-2

APPENDIX 3.46.

AP3.42-1

APPENDIX 3.42
No. 10-10581.

#### Vernon Lamar Yancey, Petitioner v. Alabama.

565 U.S. 841, 132 S. Ct. 152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6133.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 65 So. 3d 452.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Fourth Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2000 World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000 Advisory Committee)

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 
notice advises interested persons that the next meeting of the WRC-2000 
Advisory Committee will be held on Thursday, July 30, 1998, at the 
Federal Communications Commission. The purpose of the meeting is to 
continue preparations for the 2000 World Radiocommunication Conference. 
The Advisory Committee will consider any consensus views or proposals 
introduced by the Advisory Committee's Informal Working Groups.

DATES: July 30, 1998; 10:00 am-12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, NW, Room 
856, Washington DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon C. Ladson, FCC International 
Bureau, Planning and Negotiations Division, at (202) 418-0420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
established the WRC-2000 Advisory Committee to provide advice, 
technical support and recommendations relating to the preparation of 
United States proposals and positions for the 2000 World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-2000). In accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, this notice 
advises interested persons of the fourth meeting of the WRC-2000 
Advisory Committee.
    The WRC-2000 Advisory Committee has an open membership. All 
interested parties are invited to participate in the Advisory Committee 
and to attend its meetings. The proposed agenda for the fourth meeting 
is as follows:

AGENDA

Fourth Meeting of the WRC-2000 Advisory Committee, Federal 
Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, NW, Room 856, Washington, 
D.C. 20554

July 30, 1998; 10:00 am-12:00 noon

1. Opening Remarks
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of the Minutes of the Second Meeting
4. IWG Reports
5. Consideration of Consensus Views and Issue Papers
6. Development of Draft Proposals
7. Future Meetings
8. Other Business

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18561 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2016078EN.01001601.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Doux v Commission

(Case T-434/13) (1)

1

((Agriculture - Export refund - Poultry meat - Implementing Regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Legitimate expectations))

(2016/C 078/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Doux SA (Châteaulin, France) (represented by: J. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Tilly-Sabco (Guerlesquin, France) (represented by: R. Milchior, F. Le Roquais and S. Charbonnel, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultry meat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Doux SA to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Doux SA to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3) | Orders Tilly-Sabco to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders Tilly-Sabco to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Yvon Pierre Cariou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | March 14, 2006                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Yvon Pierre Cariou                |   |
|   | Yvon Pierre Cariou                    |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of  Dynamic Materials Corporation     |
|        |                                       |  |  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 10-5338.

#### Leroy Hefley, Petitioner v. Delaware.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 852,

178 L. Ed. 2d 583,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9625.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 916, 131 S. Ct. 279, 178 L. Ed. 2d 184, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7063.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: 

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE 

PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this 

amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation 

and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION 

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

 The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. 

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. 

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. 

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation 

date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 

Previous edition unusable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0422

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JACK ELDON JARVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 28, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 24 2020

11/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0422
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Kingstone Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Barry B. GoldsteinBarry B. GoldsteinChief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ Victor BrodskyVictor Brodsky

Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-1455.

#### Fernandos Taylor, Petitioner v. James Taylor, et al.

565 U.S. 822, 132 S. Ct. 109,

181 L. Ed. 2d 35,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5301,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 84 So. 3d 171.
# C_2014409EN.01004201.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/42

---

Order of the General Court of 10 September 2014 — Lomnici v Parliament

(Case T-650/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Petition addressed to the European Parliament concerning the new law on Slovak citizenship - Petition declared admissible - Decision to close the procedure - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 409/60

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zoltán Lomnici (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Z. Lomnici, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Pospíšilová Padowska and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament of 17 October 2013 to declare Petition No 1298/2012 closed.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The European Parliament’s request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Parliament’s request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate is rejected.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Slovak Republic and Hungary. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Slovak Republic and Hungary.

| 4. | Mr Zoltán Lomnici shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Mr Zoltán Lomnici shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament.

| 5. | The Slovak Republic and Hungary shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Slovak Republic and Hungary shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H.
Donnelley, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefAugust 11, 2006
    
    
    
    Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2006
  38
No. 10-7594.

#### Daniel James Sixta, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1188, 131 S. Ct. 1017,

178 L. Ed. 2d 843,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 849.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 569.
No. 10-10236.

#### George E. McDermott, Petitioner v. Kenneth J. MacFadyen, et al.

565 U.S. 831, 132 S. Ct. 130,

181 L. Ed. 2d 52,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5701,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         160,839
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          38,820
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               109,930
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    372,481
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         399,208
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           404,793
<LOANS>                                      1,693,042
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,888,714
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,436,022
<SHORT-TERM>                                   120,247
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,282
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,743
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,888,714
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                148,127
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               43,039
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,641
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               198,807
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              76,904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,928
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          116,975
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,963
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,428
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 95,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,542
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      55,542
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,907
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,990
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   625
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 14,543
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,690
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,471
<RECOVERIES>                                       754
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,936
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            21,936
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>