alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Steven A. Davis

Steven A. Davis
    
    Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Larry C. Corbin

Larry C. Corbin
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Michael J. Gasser

Michael J. Gasser
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Dr. E. Gordon Gee

Dr. E. Gordon Gee
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ E.W. (Bill) Ingram III

E.W. (Bill) Ingram III
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010




---



##### 



Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Cheryl L. Krueger

Cheryl L. Krueger
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ G. Robert Lucas II

G. Robert Lucas II
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Eileen A. Mallesch

Eileen A. Mallesch
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Bryan G. Stockton

Bryan G. Stockton
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010/s/ Paul S. Williams

Paul S. Williams
    
    Director
    
    June 28, 2010
 Signature Page for Form 10-K Power of Attorney
No. 10-981.

No. 10-986.

No. 10-1080.

#### Navajo Nation, Petitioner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. Peabody Western Coal Company, Petitioner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner v. Peabody Western Coal Company, et al.

565 U.S. 814, 132 S. Ct. 91,

181 L. Ed. 2d 21,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6753.

October 3, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 610 F.3d 1070.
# Employee Spotlight: Maria Friend

/ Published Sept. 27, 2016
Richmond, VA, 
**Name:**  Ms. Maria Friend

**Organization:** Assigned to DLA Aviation, Career Development Branch DOB / OJT assignment with FAJE

**Years or Months of Service:** 1 year and 3 months

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**DLA Aviation Pathways Student Intern (Contracting).  I support my section by performing pre-award functions inclusive of acquisition planning, soliciting, evaluation, negotiation, and the awarding of contracts compliant with Federal Government Regulations and Policies.

**Why did you want to become a DLA Pathways Student Intern?** My personal decision to change careers from private to public sector employment was a desire to increase my commitment to public service.  Over the last three years, I became interested in procurement and acquisitions within the Federal Government.  Due to the competitive nature of the selection process, I decided to advance my education by enrolling in a second Master’s degree program to gain a competitive advantage when the job became available.  As such, I was selected as contracting intern in May 2015.

**What degree are you working towards?**My second Master’s Degree will be a MBA concentration Human Resource Management, completion December 2016.

**What aspect(s) of being an Intern give you the most satisfaction? Why?** One of the most satisfying experiences of being an intern, is the awareness that I have the power to contribute to our Warfighters.  As an intern, you are a “Sponge” from the comprehensive classroom training, to coaching and development activities provided by everyone from Contract Specialists, Material Planners, Product Specialist, CASs, Contract Officers, and my own Team Members all to help me become the best Contract Specialist I can be in order to support DLA’s Mission.

**What is your biggest pet peeve?**  My biggest pet peeve is tardiness.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** Some of my passions are mentoring High School ladies as they transition to various institutions of higher education or career choices.  I am actively involved in public service projects of cancer research and awareness related to Breast, Colon, and Lung cancer.  I value my family and long-standing childhood and college friendships that span over thirty-five years.  My dearest passion is my sorority, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, INC. and the best team in the National Football League (Dallas Cowboys).

**What is your proudest accomplishment?** Recognized by Stayer University 122nd Commencement ceremony, October 2014 as a Distinguished Honor Graduate Student based upon achieving a Master’s Degree in Public Administration with a 4.0 GPA.   Presently on the path to complete the Second Master’s with a 4.0 in December 2016.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?**  I love all types of music

**Who is the most influential person in your life ... past or present?**  My mother is the most influential person in my life.  She is one of the kindest person ever to walked this earth.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 284 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 284

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mortgage Insurance Tax Deduction Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 163(h)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or accrued after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
2016-1823.

#### State v. James.

Muskingum App. No. CT2015-0059, 2016-Ohio-7660.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice
President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K of Elgin National Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the calendar year ended December 31, 2005) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting,; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer


March 30, 2006
ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : O=CCCC2CCC3C1CCC(C1)C23

CHEM : 4,7-Methano-1H-indene-1-propanal, octahydroCAS Num: 1464989-16-9

ChemID1: 

MOL FOR: C13 H20 O1 

MOL WT : 192.30

Log Kow: 3.505 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: 4.800 (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

Wat Sol: 3.809 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 13.4 (mg/L, User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

--------------------------------------

Log Kow: 4.800 (User Entered)

Wat Sol: 13.4 (mg/L, User Entered)

------------------------------------------------

Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

 No Data Available

--------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.11 Class-specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Aldehydes (Mono)

 Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

=========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish 96-hr LC50 0.376

Aldehydes (Mono) : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 0.150

Aldehydes (Mono) : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 0.432

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish ChV 0.019

Aldehydes (Mono) : Daphnid ChV 0.037 !

Aldehydes (Mono) : Green Algae ChV 0.289

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish (SW) 96-hr LC50 0.524

Aldehydes (Mono) : Fish (SW) ChV 0.101 !

=========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

Neutral Organic SAR : Fish 96-hr LC50 0.483

(Baseline Toxicity) : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 0.355

 : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 0.770

 : Fish ChV 0.064

: Daphnid ChV 0.071

: Green Algae ChV 0.359
Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to

 measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the

 water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES)

 are reported.

NOTE: ! = exclamation designates: The toxicity value was estimated through

 application of acute-to-chronic ratios per methods outlined in

 the ECOSAR Methodology Document provided in the ECOSAR Help Menu.

------------------------------

Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

------------------------------

If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs

presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those 

endpoints.

Aldehydes (Mono):

----------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)

Baseline Toxicity SAR Limitations:

---------------------------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2014045EN.01004603.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/46

---

Action brought on 30 November 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-116/13)

2014/C 45/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights into the European Union pension scheme which applies the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations unlawful and, consequently, inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations unlawful and, consequently, inapplicable;

| — | Annul the decision of 18 June 2013 to increase the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into the service, as part of the transfer thereof into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, by application of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 18 June 2013 to increase the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into the service, as part of the transfer thereof into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, by application of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           15846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   155946
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                     174792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                364858
<PP&E>                                          769307
<DEPRECIATION>                                  436331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  991380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           203092
<BONDS>                                         407134
<COMMON>                                         83465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      131744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    991380
<SALES>                                         843723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                843723
<CGS>                                           649306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   727696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (601)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  81122
<INCOME-TAX>                                     25825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              55297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     55297
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
No. 10-7907.

#### Willie J. Asbury, Petitioner v. South Carolina Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1205, 131 S. Ct. 1062,

178 L. Ed. 2d 873,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 945.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

======================================================

MIWG,

The below Message was issued from NGA through our Maritime Watch Desk. 

HYDROLANT 564/22(55).

BLACK SEA.

UKRAINE.

DNC 10.

MINING OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

IN AREAS BOUND BY:

A. 46-04.0N 033-12.8E, 46-03.1N 033-13.9E,

 45-55.6N 033-08.1E, 45-57.3N 032-54.5E,

 46-00.9N 033-06.8E.

B. 46-06.4N 032-05.4E, 45-57.4N 032-53.3E,

 45-49.2N 032-47.0E, 45-59.7N 032-02.4E.

C. 46-09.4N 032-06.6E, 46-07.0N 032-05.5E,

 45-58.2N 032-54.2E, 45-59.5N 033-05.5E,

 46-00.9N 033-05.5E, 46-00.9N 033-04.8E.

D. 46-32.4N 031-01.2E, 46-32.6N 031-26.3E,

 46-28.0N 031-27.9E, 46-27.9N 031-00.8E.

E. 46-22.2N 031-31.9E, 46-36.6N 031-31.6E,

 46-36.0N 031-00.1E, 46-31.5N 030-44.4E./

NAVAREA III 0092/22

BLACK SEA - NORTHWESTERN PART

1.- DUE TO MINE DANGER NAVIGATION PROHIBITED UNTILL FURTHER NOTICE IN AREA BOUNDED BY:

A

46-04.0N 033-12.8E

46-03.1N 033-13.9E

45-55.6N 033-08.1E

45-57.3N 032-54.5E

46-00.9N 033-06.8E

B

46-06.4N 032-05.4E

45-57.4N 032-53.3E

45-49.2N 032-47.0E

45-59.7N 032-02.4E

C

46-09.4N 032-06.6E

46-07.0N 032-05.5E

45-58.2N 032-54.2E

45-59.5N 033-05.5E
46-00.9N 033-05.5E

46-00.9N 033-04.8E AND COASTLINE

D

46-32.4N 031-01.2E

46-32.6N 031-26.3E

46-28.0N 031-27.9E

46-27.9N 031-00.8E

E

46-34.9N 031-30.5E

46-35.6N 031-29.6E

46-34.7N 031-26.1E

46-28.1N 031-28.4E

46-21.8N 031-30.3E

46-22.2N 031-31.9E AND COASTLINE

F

46-35.8N 031-01.0E

46-34.5N 031-00.5E

46-35.7N 031-05.7E

46-35.2N 031-05.9E

46-34.9N 031-21.7E

46-35.5N 031-21.7E

46-35.5N 031-23.3E

46-34.7N 031-25.1E

46-36.2N 031-30.7E

46-36.7N 031-31.8E AND COASTLINE

G

46-31.5N 030-44.2E

46-31.7 N 030-46.6E

46-30.9 N 030-49.8E

46-33.4 N 030-59.7E

46-36.0N 031-00.8E AND COASTLINE

======================================================

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
19-1668-cv

Henry v. Oluwole

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A 

SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED 

BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. 

WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY 

MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE 

NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY 

OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the 

Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York on the 

1st day of April, two thousand twenty.

Present: DENNIS JACOBS,

ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

 Circuit Judges.

MARK A. BARNETT,

Judge.

1

_____________________________________________________

LAURA HENRY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. 19-1668-cv

OLAKUNLE OLUWOLE, M.D., 

Defendant-Appellant.

*

_____________________________________________________

Appearing for Appellant: John F. Costa, Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP, Bridgeport, CT.

Appearing for Appellee: Richard C. Gordon, West Hartford, CT.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.).

1 Judge Mark A. Barnett, United States District Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

* The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to amend the official caption as set forth above. 
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 

AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Olakunle Oluwole appeals from the May 14, 2019 order of the United States District 

Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) denying his motion for reconsideration of the 

order of the district court denying his motion to set aside default judgment. We assume the 

parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for 

review.

The orders appealed from are nonfinal interlocutory orders. See Enron Oil Corp. v. 

Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 97 (2d Cir. 1993) (“[D]efault judgment cannot be entered until the 

amount of damages has been ascertained.”); Dow Chem. Pac. Ltd. v. Rascator Mar. S.A., 782 

F.2d 329, 336 (2d Cir. 1986) (concluding that default judgment was “in fact no more than 

another interlocutory entry of default” because the district court “expressly ordered [in its default 

judgment] that there be an inquest as to damages and indicated that only thereafter would a final 

judgment be entered”). When the district court in the present case entered its order of default 

judgment, it did not decide the issue of damages, which remains pending before the district court. 

In the absence of a final judgment, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 

We have considered the remainder of the parties’ arguments regarding jurisdiction and 

find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
당신은담배로부터 

벗어날수있습니다 

힌언급연센터
Exhibit 32.2
Form 10-QSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Viking  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended Marcy 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph
Warrino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2004



/s/ Joseph Warrino
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No.: 01/71-0369]


RFE VI SBIC, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of a Small Business 
Investment Company License

    On March 9, 1998, an application was filed by RFE VI SBIC, L.P., at 
36 Grove Street, New Canaan, Connecticut 06840, with the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 107.300 of the Regulations 
governing small business investment companies (13 CFR 107.300 (1997)) 
for a license to operate as a small business investment company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 01/71-0369 on June 17, 1998, to RFE VI SBIC, L.P., 
to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 98-18139 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P