alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION****906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of JanusCapital Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary D. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                       The reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                       The informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Gary D.  Black       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Gary D. Black            |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

Date: July 30, 2007

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Janus CapitalGroup Inc. and will be retained by Janus Capital Group Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Attachment**

**Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 22-1 Meeting (March 9, 2022)**

**Current as of May 26, 2022**

SPRC 22-1 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/Archives/supply/ 

Page **4** of **5**
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18137]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before September 8, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, S.W., Suite 5000, Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 
202-205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: ``Executive Education Program Participant Profile''.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Form No: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: 8(a) Participants.
    Annual Response: 300.
    Annual Burden: 225.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Cherina Hunter, General Business & Industry Specialist, Office of 
Minority Enterprise Development, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street S.W., Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone No: 202-205-
6412.
    Send comments regarding whether this information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, 
accuracy of burden estimate, in addition to ways to minimize this 
estimate, and ways to enhance the quality.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Vanessa Smith,
Acting Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-18137 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### *State, Respondent, v. Licon, Petitioner,*

No. 91954-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31670-0-III, March 10, 2015, 10,2015,186 186 Wn. App. 1026. *Granted on a specific issue*and *remanded*to the superior court November 4, 2015.
No. 10-1523.

#### SGE Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Juan R. Torres, et al.

565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5392.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 63.
### 2

was also determined that for the currently registered uses, no Habitat Modi fication was likely for designated critical habitats.
The Preliminary Work Plan requested public comment on the ecological risk assessment/ endangered species effects determination and comments were received from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Qua lity Control Board (8/26/2013), the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (8/26/2013), and the California Stor mwater Quality Association (8/23 /2013 ). Comments from all three organizations were similar and are summarized below. Overall, the commenters felt that the data and modeling required of other pyrethroids undergoing registration review shou ld also be required for metofluthrin , metofluthrin’s environmental risk assessment should include a quantitative assessment of the same level of rigor as the risk assessments for all other pyrethroids, and that all pyrethroids should be reviewed together as a group.
Summary of Comments

 Request that the de minimis environmental risk determination be rescinded and a full risk assessment be conducted.

 Based on experience with other pesticides, the outdoor misters and indoor bedbug treatments are likely to cause and/or add to the pyrethroid toxicity in urban waterways.

 Metofluthrin should be considered cumulatively with the other pyrethroids because toxicity is additive within the class.

 The environmental risk assessment should consider that some fraction of the mist will deposit on outdoor surfaces where it c an then be transported to storm drains or directly to water bodies.

 Environmentally significant amounts of metofluthrin will be released to indoor drains during washing of linens that have covered treated mattresses and of clothes worn by people using the mister and the clip

- on vaporizer.

 Aquatic toxicity data for known sensitive species, i.e., Hyalella Azteca, Americamysis bahia, Chironomus dilutes, and Leptocheirus plumulosus should be required and incorporated into the risk assessment.

 Experimental photo degradation rates for air and surfaces are needed.

 An anaerobic sediment degradation rate is needed.

 Modeling of urban runoff from impervious surfaces and turf should be completed.

 Modeling down

- the

- drain pathways to wastewater treatment plants should be completed.

 Analytical methods for water and sediment matrices that detect metofluthrin at environmentally relevant concentrations should be required from the pesticide manufacturer.

 Water qu ality monitoring data should be required.

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division plans to review and respond to these comments at the same time that the Health Effects Division responds to comments received on the human h ealth risk assessment during the next ph ase of registration review, currently scheduled for June 2014.
No. 10-5028.

#### Catherine Walsh, Petitioner v. John M. Quinn, et al.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 983,

178 L. Ed. 2d 811,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 245.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 899, 131 S. Ct. 230, 178 L. Ed. 2d 153, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6248.
EXHIBIT 10(iii)B(1)


                                   EXHIBIT E

Performance criteria for FY 1997 - FY 1999 cycle include the following:
Aggregate Income, defined as the targeted income, before taxes and extraordinary
items,<F3> for the entire three-year period, as shown in the table below.
                                                                                
Performance goals and amounts funding the payout pool include the following:

Performance Level         Aggregate Income          % of Net Earnings to Pool

Below Target              Below $541,768,000                   0%
Target                          $541,768,000            .83% of earnings
Above Target              Above $541,768,000            .83% of earnings


During the FY 97 - 99 cycle, Farmland Industries, Inc. must return to its
members at least $147,285,000 in cash,<F4> or no payout will occur under this 
plan.

In order to ensure the integrity of Farmland's financial strength, a limit on
funded indebtedness as a percent of capitalization is incorporated into this
plan.  In the event that the indebtedness ratio is above the level which is
established by bank covenants at the end of the cycle, not payout will occur
under this plan.

<F3>     The Chief  Financial  Officer and  the  Chief Executive  Officer  must
     approve the classification  of any  item as  "extraordinary."   Transaction
     deemed as "extraordinary"  and therefore excluded  in the determination  of
     Income for variable compensation include:
     _    The punitive  portion of  litigation results  in favor  of or  against
          Farmland, excluding redemptive payments on normal business matter  
          where the intent is  to substantially restore net income to  where 
          it would have  been had the incident  not occurred.
     _    Nonrecurring (one-time) adjustments to income  or expense such as  the
          gain from settlement of the retirement plan.  Any such items would 
          generally  be reported as extraordinary items on Farmland financial 
          statements under generally accepted accounting principles. 
     _    The gain or loss on the disposal of a major asset, group of assets, or
          investments.
     _    The impact of adjustments resulting from LIFO inventory computations
          or reserves.
     _    Other items as approved.

     Specific requests by an operating unit for treatment of an item as
     "extraordinary" must be approved by the Senior Management representative 
     before review by the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer.


<F4> Cash Returned to Members includes cash patronage, equity  redemptions,
     additional equity redemptions due  to tax savings  on net operating  losses
     (NOL), ownerships retirements, capital credits, preferred stock  dividends,
     preferred stock redemptions, and estate settlements.
No. 10-6717.

#### John Ebert, Petitioner v. Donald Gaetz, Warden.

562 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 578,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8717.

178 L. Ed. 2d 422,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 404.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: September 29 , 2012 TO: RI CE NESHAP Docket, EPA - HQ - OAR - 2008 - 0708 FROM: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG SUBJECT: September 25 , 2012 Meeting Regarding Proposed Amendments to the RI CE

NESHAP **SUMMARY** A meeting was held between the EPA and the attend ees listed below on September 25 , 2012 to discuss the comments submitted by the Electric Power Suppl y Association (EPSA) on the propo sed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines . The amendments were proposed on June 7, 2012. **ATTENDEES** Gina McCarth y , EPA John Shelk, EPSA Janet McCabe, EPA Bill Holden, GenOn Joel Beauvais, EPA Shahid Malik, PSEG Joe Goffman, EPA Thad Miller, Calpine Peter Tsirigotis, EPA Yvonne McIntyr e, Calpine Robert Wayland , EPA Derek Furstenwerth, Calpine Melanie King, EPA Mike Eckard, First Energy
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard Goldenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges
Incorporated.


Dated: November 14, 2003                           /S/ RICHARD GOLDENBERG
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Richard Goldenberg
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Emerson Radio Corp., (the Company) for the period
ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Duncan Hon, Chief Executive Officer, and Andrew L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



By:

/s/ Duncan HonDuncan HonChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Andrew L. DavisAndrew L. DavisChief Financial Officer


Dated: July 29, 2015

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXIT SURVEY

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. How is this survey administered? 

This is an online survey administered by SurveyMonkey that can be accessed from any computer and it 

is completely anonymous. The link for accessing the survey is 

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=bMqXHpODLYwUS15pQRLtWA_3d_3d. 

2. How are employees notified of the survey?

The employees are informed of the survey by their supervisor and via statements on the Exit Checklist 

and on their last SF 50, Notification of Personnel Action. The employee should contact his/her 

organization POC for survey notification process information specific to his or her organization. 

3. Who should complete the survey?

All federal employees departing DLA, to include temporary and term employees, are asked to complete 

the survey. The survey is not open to military members or contractors. 

Note: The survey is for employees departing DLA, not transferring between organizations. EX: An 

employee transferring from DLA Land and Maritime to DLA Energy should NOT complete the survey. 

 

4. Is this a mandatory survey for departing employees?

No, the survey is strictly voluntary. 

5. How will the survey responses be used?

The responses you provide will be used in conjunction with other Human Capital (HC) Survey results 

and other sources of information to help us design new HC initiatives and develop corrective actions and 

strategies to retain current employees and attract new talent. 

6. Who should employees contact with questions about the survey? 

Employees should contact their organization POC or forward questions to exitsurvey@dla.mil.
No. 10-5701.

#### Samer Karawi, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 985,

178 L. Ed. 2d 814,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 157.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 337, 178 L. Ed. 2d 219, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7198.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : STEPHEN LAW ,

De btor.

______________________________ STEPHEN LAW ,

Appe lla nt, v. ALFRE D H. SIEGEL, C h a pte r 7 Truste e , Appe lle e . No. 14-60049 B AP No. 13-1344 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l Dunn, Kirsc he r, a

nd Ta y lor, B ankruptc y Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 16, 2016 ** B e fore : LEAVY, B ER ZON, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. C ha pte r 7 de btor Ste phe n La

w a ppe a l s pro se from

a judgm e nt of the B ankruptc y

Appe l late Pane l (“ B AP” ) a ffirm i ng the ba nkruptc y c o urt’ s orde r 

# FIL ED N OV 23 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

uthoriz i ng the pa

ym e n t of profe ssiona l fe e s a s propose d in the c h a

pte r 7 truste e ’ s am e nde d fina l re port. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 158(d). W e re vie w de novo B AP de c i sions, a nd a pply the sa m e sta nda rd of re vie w tha

t the B AP a pplie d to theba

nkruptc y c ourt’ s ruling. Boy ajian v . N e w Falls C orp. (In re Boy ajian) , 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a ffirm . Law ha s not de m onstra

te d tha t the ba nkruptc y c o urt a buse d its disc re tion or othe rwise ide ntifie d a

ny e rror in the ba

nkruptc y c ourt’ s orde r a

pproving the pa ym e nt of profe ssiona l fe e s propose d in thec ha pte r 7 truste e ’ s a

m e nde d fina l re port. Se e In reBe nne t , 298 F.3d 1059, 1063 (9th C ir. 2002) (“ The ba nk ruptc y c ourt’ s attorne y s’ fe e de t e rm ination will only be re ve rse d if the c ourt a buse d its disc re tion or e rrone ously

a pplie d the la

w.” ). W e re je c t a s without me rit La

w’ s se rvic e -re late d c onte ntions a nd his unsupporte d a lle gat ions of wrongdoing on the pa rt of the truste e and the truste e ’ s c ounse l. W e do not c onside r Law’ s c onte ntions re late d to a se pa ra te a ppe a l . W e do not c onside r argum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l or m atte rs not spe c ific a lly

and distinc tly

ra ise d a nd a rgue d in theope n ing brie f. Se e Padge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009). AFFIRM E D. 1 4 - 6 0 0 4 9 2
YOU CAN ESCAPE 


FROM SMOKING 


KOREAN OUnLINE
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2856]


The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls; Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; OMB #1405-0093, 
Request for Approval of Manufacturing License Agreements, Technical 
Assistance Agreements and other Agreements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Request for Approval of 
Manufacturing License Agreements, Technical Assistance Agreements and 
other Agreements.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: OMB #1405-0093.
    Respondents: Exporters of U.S. Technology.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 6 hours.
    Total Estimated Burden: 6,000 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Copies of the proposed information 
collection and supporting documents may be obtained from Charles S. 
Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. Interested persons are invited to 
submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the 
proposed survey by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent 
to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, (202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18326 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
Tips From Former Smokers Tips 2019 Vignette

Leonard Nimoy Vignette / “Traumatic for Both of Us” 1:47

The spot opens with the words “Traumatic for Both of Us. The story of Former Smoker, Leonard Nimoy”

displayed on screen. It then cuts to Susan Nimoy speaking on camera.

SUSAN: I’m Susan Nimoy and I was married to Leonard Nimoy. 

We see a photo of Leonard and Susan from their wedding. We see various photos of a younger 

Leonard as Susan describes his personality. And then we cut back to Susan. 

SUSAN: He was very, very funny. He was very poetic, very empathic, very sensitive. He was 

kind to people, gracious, elegant. He was – you know – a wonderful, unique man.

SUSAN: He had chronic breathing difficulties for as long as I knew him. Leonard was 

diagnosed with COPD. 

The spot cuts to a shot of Leonard Nimoy in a wheelchair, wearing an oxygen cannula. Text 

appears on screen reading, “Leonard Nimoy smoked and it caused his COPD.”

SUSAN: The doctor gave him a bunch of new prescriptions and then began a physical therapy 

program. Stationary oxygen in the house. Portable oxygen. 

We see shots of a hospital and oxygen equipment in the house and in the car. 

SUSAN: It became the story of his life and mine. And he became more and more weak and 

more and more oxygen dependent.

We cut to interior shots of the hospital in the emergency room and the hospital room and see a 

close up of Leonard looking sick and frail.

SUSAN: The last month where he had to go to emergency three times, it was traumatic for 

both of us. Really, excruciatingly scary.

An emotional Susan speaks to the camera. 

SUSAN: I’m sorry. You know when you love someone you don’t want them to die. 

We see a family photo of Susan surrounded by her children and friends.

SUSAN: We were all there at 8:04 AM on February 27th, when the nurse said, he’s gone. 

The spot cuts to two final photos of Leonard Nimoy when he was healthier. And then cuts to 

the art card, which reads “Smoking caused Leonard Nimoy’s COPD. And his death.”
ART CARD: HHS and CDC logo. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.