alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
production. One of the facility furnaces is subject to NSPS Subpart UUU (Calciners and Dryers 

in Mineral Industries). Two other facility furnaces predate the NSPS applicability date. 

3.0 Technical Review - Emission Units, Pollutants, and Control Technologies 

3.1 Emissions and Controls 

Sand and Gravel Mining/Proce~sin~'~~ 

Emissions from the production of sand and gravel consist primarily of particulate matter (PM) 

and particulate matter less than 10 micrometers (PM-10) in aerodynamic diameter, which are 

emitted by many operations at sand and gravel processing plants, such as conveying, screening, 

crushing, and storing operations. Generally, these materials are wet or moist when handled, and 

process emissions can be negligible. A substantial portion of these emissions may consist of 

heavy particles that settle out within the plant. Other potentially significant sources of PM and 

PM-10 emissions are haul roads. Emissions fiom dryers include PM and PM-10, as well as 

typical combustion products including CO, C02 , and Nh. In addition, dryers may be sources of 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) or sulfur oxides (S@) emissions, depending on the type of 

fuel used to fire the dryer. 

With the exception of drying, emissions from sand and gravel operations primarily are in the 

form of fugitive dust, and control techniques applicable to fugitive dust sources are appropriate. 

Some successful control techniques used for haul roads are dust suppressant application, paving, 

route modifications, and soil stabilization; for conveyors, covering and wet suppression; for 

storage piles, wet suppression, windbreaks, enclosure, and soil stabilizers; for conveyor and 

batch transfer points, wet suppression and various methods to reduce fieefall distances (e. g., 

telescopic chutes, stone ladders, and hinged boom stacker conveyors); and for screening and 

other size classification, covering and wet suppression. Wet suppression techniques include 

application of water, chemicals andfor foam, usually at crusher or conveyor feed andlor 

discharge points. Such spray systems at transfer points and on material handling operations have 

been estimated to reduce emissions 70 to 95 percent. Spray systems can also reduce loading and 

wind erosion emissions from storage piles of various materials 80 to 90 percent. Control 

efficiencies depend upon local climatic conditions, source properties and duration of control 

effectiveness. Wet suppression has a carryover effect downstream of the point of application of 

water or other wetting agents, as long as the surface moisture content is high enough to cause the 

fines to adhere to the larger rock particles. 

In addition to figitive dust control techniques, some facilities use add-on control devices to ' 

reduce emissions of PM and PM-10 hm sand and gravel processing operations. Controls in use 

include cyclones, wet scrubbers, venturi scrubbers, and fabric filters. These types of controls are 

rarely used at construction sand and gravel plants, but are more common at industrial sand and 

gravel processing facilities. 

NMMProc TSD 6-14-02 Created on 6/18/2002 9:39:00 AM
DLA COLUMBUS - AFGE LOCAL 1148

LOCALLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
ARTICLE 20

SHIFT WORK SCHEDULE

1. The parties agree that when the accomplishment of the mission requires that there be more than one shift over
the course of a day, the Agency will determine the numbers, types, and grades of employees assigned to shifts.

2. A Director/Office Manager will have the option to allow shift bids in an area on an annual basis. The shift
bid will be by SCD. Management will determine the numbers, types, and grades of employees assigned to
shifts, and maintains the right to address changes based on the qualifications and skills needed of employees,
mission, and emergencies.

3. Reassignments tied to shift changes will be addressed in accordance with Article 29, Section 3.

FOR THE UNION FOR THE EMPLOYER
ROBIN MENEFEE DON SCHULZE She
Chief Negotiator for Local 1148 Chief Negotiator for DSCC Columbus

19/1/23 12 [2/23

DATE DATE
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2964 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care transition 

youth as members of targeted groups for purposes of the work opportunity credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

foster care transition youth as members of targeted 

groups for purposes of the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improved Employment 

5 Outcomes for Foster Youth Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2964 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FOSTER CARE TRANSITION YOUTH 

2 FOR PURPOSES OF WORK OPPORTUNITY 

3 CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

6 end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end 

7 of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding 

8 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(K) a qualified foster care transition 

10 youth.’’. 

11 (b) QUALIFIED FOSTER CARE TRANSITION YOUTH

12 DEFINED.—Section 51(d) of such Code is amended by 

13 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(16) QUALIFIED FOSTER CARE TRANSITION

15 YOUTH.—The term ‘qualified foster care transition 

16 youth’ means any individual who is certified by the 

17 designated local agency as— 

18 ‘‘(A) not having attained age 27 as of the 

19 hiring date, and 

20 ‘‘(B) having been in foster care (within the 

21 meaning of section 477 of the Social Security 

22 Act (42 U.S.C. 677)), after attaining the age 

23 specified in subsection (a)(7) of such section.’’. 

24 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

25 this section shall apply with respect to individuals who 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2964 IH

1 begin work for the employer after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT  21.1
SUBSIDIARIES  OF  ENERGY  CORPORATION  OF  AMERICA  ON  JUNE  30,  2000


NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      STATE OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                     <C>
Allegheny & Western Energy Corporation  West Virginia
Eastern American Energy Corporation. .  West Virginia
Eastern Capital Corporation. . . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Exploration Corporation. . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Marketing Corporation. . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Pipeline Corporation . . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Systems Corporation. . . . . .  West Virginia
Mapcom Systems, Inc. . . . . . . . . .  Virginia
Mountaineer Gas Company. . . . . . . .  West Virginia
Mountaineer Gas Services, Inc. . . . .  West Virginia
Natural Gas Transportation Company . .  West Virginia
Westech Australia, LLC . . . . . . . .  Colorado
Westech Energy Corporation . . . . . .  Colorado
Westech Energy New Zealand . . . . . .  New Zealand
Westech Energy New Zealand, LLC. . . .  Colorado
Westside Acquisition Corporation . . .  Colorado
</TABLE>
----

----

| 1. | the                  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.,                  for the                  period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Falcon                  Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |
|   |   |

|                                               |                                     |                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                               |                                     |
|                                          |                                |                                |
| Dated:  August                  14, 2007 |                                     | /s/ Karen                  Y. Duran |
|                                               | Karen                  Y. Duran,         |
|                                               | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----

----
#### In the Matter of Snyder Development Co., Inc., Appellant, v Town of Amherst Town Board, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 672]

— Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mahoney, J), entered September 18, 2002, which dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.

*1384It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing its CPLR article 78 petition wherein it sought to annul the determination designating an entire parcel of real property owned by petitioner as an historic landmark. Petitioner, whose parcel encompasses a gate house, barn and wooded area in the Town of Amherst, contends that the determination must be annulled because the barn and wooded area have no historical significance. It is well established that “[a] landmark designation is an administrative determination . . . that must be upheld if it has support in the record, a reasonable basis in law, and is not arbitrary and capricious” *(Matter of Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assn. v City of New York,*82 NY2d 35, 41 [1993]; *see Matter of Canisius Coll, v City of Buffalo,*217 AD2d 985, 985-986 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 709 [1995]; *see generally Matter of Concerned Citizens of Perinton v Town of Perinton,*261 AD2d 880 [1999], *appeal dismissed*93 NY2d 1040 [1999], *cert denied sub nom. Nisco v Town of Perinton,*529 US 1111 [2000]). We are unable to review the propriety of Supreme Court’s conclusion that the determination herein meets those criteria where, as here, respondent failed to make the necessary findings of fact regarding the historical significance of the barn and wooded area *(see Matter of Fike v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Webster,*2 AD3d 1343 [2003]). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to respondent to set forth the factual basis for its determination. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
No. 10-7992.

#### Ramon Garza, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1193, 131 S. Ct. 1032,

178 L. Ed. 2d 852,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 627.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 362.
#### People v White

2d Dept: 144 AD3d 1057 (Suffolk)

denied 3/3/17 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002.

 

                In connection with the AnnualReport of Educational Development Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 28,  2008 |                                          | By                                     | /s/  Randall W. White |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |               |                                          | Randall  W. White                      |
|   |               |                                          | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |               |                                          |                                   |
| Date:  | May 28,  2008 |                                          | By                                     | /s/  Marilyn Welborn  |
|   |               | Controller and Corporate Secretary            |
|   |               | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2850]


The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls; Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; DSP-73, Application/
License for Temporary Export of Unclassified Defense Articles.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: the Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Application/License for Temporary 
Export of Unclassified Defense Articles.
    Frequency: Annual.
    Form Number: DSP-73.
    Respondents: Applicants for Export Licenses of Defense Articles.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,250 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Copies of the proposed information 
collection and supporting documents may be obtained from Charles S. 
Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. Interested persons are invited to 
submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the 
proposed survey by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent 
to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, (202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18329 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
# With audit ready software, DLA better tracks recruit training center inventory

/ Published June 24, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

In the spirit of audit readiness, the Defense Logistics Agency is installing inventory tracking software at military recruit training centers across the country.

Several DLA organizations worked together to install the distribution standard system at three of the eight recruit training centers that DLA Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles supply chain supports with military clothing items, Angela Richwine, C&T business process support chief, said.

DLA Distribution, DLA Information Operations, DLA Logistics Operations and DLA Troop Support worked together to install DSS at the RTCs.

The user-friendly software utilizes radio frequency technology to capture items’ location and quantities, improving accuracy of materiel availability, Jerry Padgett, RTC program manager for DLA Distribution business development, said.

“The RTCs will have real-time accountability and control of the DLA material in their possession,” Padgett said. “It provides automated management reports for RTC [staff] to identify trends and required corrective actions.”

Padgett has been working with DSS since 1996 and said it’s an outstanding warehouse management system. DSS was designed to replace the legacy virtual item manager system, he said.

“The DSS subject matter experts in DLA have been continuously refining DSS training material and standard operating procedures, which provide outstanding training tools for new DSS operators,” Padgett said.

Since the first DSS installation in November 2015 at Lackland Air Force Base, DSS has been customized to fit the respective workflow of each RTC, allowing staff to maintain the functionality they’re accustomed to, Tom Holtz, C&T recruit training division chief, said.

 “[At] each recruit training center, their duties are the same: support the in-bound recruits,” Holtz said. “But each of them has little nuances and they do the mission differently.”

Utilizing the standard DLA Inventory Reconciliation Management process, a quantification model used across all DLA sites, DSS increases inventory accuracy at RTCs to more than 98 percent, David Griffin, a DSS program manager with DLA Information Operations, said.

DSS was implemented at Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island, South Carolina in March and MCRD San Diego in May.

While MCRD Parris Island staff is still learning the system, DSS is working good so far, Rich Vidinha, supply system analyst, said.

“DSS gives a more detailed view of what we have and where we have it,” Vidinha said. “It’s given us a lot of advantages [and] more visibility on some of our assets.”

The installation process includes in-person training by DLA personnel and takes up to 30 to 60 days to complete, Padgett said.

DLA’s goal is to complete DSS installation at the remaining RTCs by fall 2017, Richwine said.
No. 10-420.

#### Lawrence N. Blum, Petitioner v. Michael Crowe, et al.

562 U.S. 1135, 131 S. Ct. 907,

178 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 124.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 406.
This document has been moved. 

Please refer to the new Tick-Borne Rickettsial Diseases Case Report

https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/forms/Tick_TBRD_FILL_508.pdf
No. 10-7935.

#### Eugene Ross Cousins, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1027,

178 L. Ed. 2d 849,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 690.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 255.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the three registration
statements of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") on Form S-3
(333-14617, 33-55153, and 33-44327 and the four registration statements of the
Company on Form S-8 (33-49956, 33-46519, 33-57553, and 33-51851) of our report
dated February 28, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and the financial statement schedule of the Company as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
El Paso, Texas
March 7, 1997
# Schedule B5

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12SPE4A6-15-R-0340		&"Times New Roman,Bold"&12Schedule B5
#### *State, Respondent, v. Marrufo-Sarinana, Petitioner,*

No. 91806-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71303-5-1, April 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1014. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
# DLA Aviation celebrates opening of newly renovated F/A 18 Material Support Office in Jacksonville

/ Published Dec. 7, 2015
JACKSONVILLE, Fla., 
A ribbon cutting ceremony held Nov. 2 officially reopened DLA Aviation at Jacksonville’s F/A 18 Material Support Office on the Fleet Readiness Center Southeast, Jacksonville, Florida. 

DLA Aviation at Jacksonville Industrial Support Activity Site Commander Maurice Meagher, along with Material Management Section Chief Dora Ramon, Material Management Cell Chief Julie Brewer and the DLA Aviation’s F/A 18 Production Team, cut the ceremonial ribbon reopening the new facility in Building 101, Room 98.

 It’s taken a lot of planning and effort to accomplish this joint project, working with Ms. Cynthia Hudson, a DLA Aviation contacting officer in Richmond, Virginia; Mr. Jimmy Parrish, Mr. Angel Quinones and Mr. Warren Nuckols, from DLA Installation Support at Richmond; Mr. Odonell Raymonvil and his team from DLA Information Operations at Jacksonville; and the Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Network Team in Jacksonville,” said Meagher. “We've turned an old antiquated office into an updated, usable facility providing our skilled workers with a safer, cleaner environment in which to better serve our customers. It’s important that we use funding in the smartest way possible- to turn an outdated office space into a useable production space is well worth the cost. We make great strides in improving our work areas here every day thanks to our dedicated employees.”
#### *Estate of Lundy, Petitioner, v. Lundy, Respondent,*

No. 91965-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71900-9-I, June 1, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 948. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40029 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

FABIAN ECHARTEA

- ALVARADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 663

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Fabian Echartea

- Alvardo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Echartea

- Alvarado h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40029 Document: 00513242810 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 15

- 40029

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40029 Document: 00513242810 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015