alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Stanford University; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-
Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-095R. Applicant: Stanford University, Palo Alto, 
CA 94304. Instrument: Ultrasound Bone Densitometer. Manufacturer: McCue 
Plc, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 65679, December 
15, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) Reduced 
transducer size (\1/2\ inch) appropriate for use with children's feet, 
(2) external calipers for precise placement of the transducers and (3) 
available normative standards from studies indicating a precision of 3-
5% for repeated measurements. These capabilities are pertinent to the 
applicant's intended purposes and we know of no other instrument or 
apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument 
which is being manufactured in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-18305 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**













**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**






**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Cynthia L. Hedrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
      knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350), that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














/s/Cynthia
                L. HedrickCynthia
                L. HedrickChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                14, 2007
EXHIBIT 99.1


           NASDAQ NOTIFIES EVCI OF CONTINUED SMALL CAP MARKET LISTING
                HEARING FILE CLOSED BECAUSE OF MARKET PRICE GAINS

YONKERS, N.Y. -- April 29, 2003 -- EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated announced
today receipt of a letter from NASDAQ stating that EVCI's common stock regained
compliance with NASDAQ's minimum bid price requirement. Accordingly, EVCI common
stock will continue its listing on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market.

Dr. John J. McGrath, Chief Executive Officer and President, expressed his
pleasure at the receipt of such notification and noted that the recent market
price gains reflect a positive recognition by the Street of EVCI's successful
transition into a profitable post-secondary education company. "While I am
pleased with the uptick in both the volume and share price and the resultant
increase in shareholder value, I believe even these recent levels reflect an
under valuation of EVCI when comparing EVCI to education industry averages on
any number of criteria, including revenue growth year over year, price to
revenue per share, and price to earnings per share."
Exhibit No. 31.1 

Form 10-K 

Synthetic Blood International, Inc. 

**Certification**

I, Robert Nicora, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2006 of Synthetic Blood International, Inc.; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: July 27, 2006
1517 WEST FRONT STREET  SUITE 354  TYLER, TX 75702  TEL: 903-593-8471  FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

SAM GRIFFITH

BRIAN HOYLE

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

December 30, 2014

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-13-00362-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 007-0695-13

Style: Dennis Ray Pinson

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. James W. Huggler Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Dennis Ray Pinson

Mandate executed on __31ST_ day of ____DECEMBER________, 2014.

Brief explanation of action taken: _____SCANNED__________________________________

_________________LINDA RHYMES______________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/31/2014 1:14:55 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Skillsoft offers you maximum support for 

formal training and day-to-day informal 

learning needs.

Programs include:

•	 Business Skills

•	 IT Skills and Certifications

•	 Leadership Development

•	 Project Management

•	 Interpersonal Skills

•	 Communication Skills

Instead of searching for hours on the 

Internet, find books on the subjects you

need within a few keystrokes without 

worrying about the credibility of the source.

LMS Empowers You 

to Manage Your Professional 

Development

email questions to LMS@dla.mil

DLA Training

800.458.7903

http://www.hr.dla.mil/training/

Learning History 

Your learning history should include all 

learning events completed in the last five

years.

If a learning event supports a certification,

it should be contained in your learning

history—regardless of the date you 

completed the learning event.

If your learning history is not complete, 

email us at LMS@dla.mil.

“Education must have

an end in view,

for it is not an end in itself.”

Sybil Marshall
Can I Update my Profile?

Profile is your personal information page.

It is important to choose your supervisor in 

LMS. This tells the DLA LMS who approves 

your training and receives information 

regarding your training requests.

1. From your LMS Home page, click on 

your name. Or, click the Your Talent 

Profile is incomplete in the Alerts 

section of your Home page. 

2. Click on the Edit icon beside the

Employee Information Box. 

3. Click the magnifier icon and the

Search User screen will appear. 

4. Complete the Last Name field. If the

last name is common, complete the 

First Name field. Click Search.

5. Identify the name of your supervisor. 

Click Select.

6. Click Save. 

How Do I Get Started?

From the DLA Human Resources Web

page at www.hr.dla.mil/tools, find and

select Learning Management System 

(LMS).

This takes you to the LMS page. Select 

Access the DLA Learning Management 

System (LMS). 

First Time Users

DLA LMS automatically recognizes you 

by your Common Access Card (CAC).

There are no logon IDs or passwords to 

remember.

LMS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a

week.

LMS Welcome Page

•	 View your My Learning Assignments

•	 View status of your current learning 

event registration 

•	 View curriculum status

•	 View your Learning History

•	 Assess your knowledge or 

competency level

•	 Search or browse courses

What is LMS?

The DLA LMS is a commercial off-the-shelf 

software package that provides capabilities

for employees and supervisors to better

manage the entire spectrum of learning—

from planning to learning event execution 

within a single environment.

Students can:

•	 Browse courses

•	 View their My Learning 

Assignments

•	 Check their curriculum 

status

•	 Review their Learning 

History

•	 View their profile

•	 Run reports pertaining 

to self

Supervisors can view the same items as 

students and also:

•	 View subordinates’ My Learning

Assignments and Learning History

•	 Run reports on subordinates

•	 Receive notifications of overdue

learning events for subordinates

•	 Receive learning event notifications for

subordinates
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Subcommittee for Community Affairs of the Advisory Committee for 
Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following subcommittee meeting.

    Name: Subcommittee for Community Affairs of the Advisory 
Committee for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research.
    Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-4:45 p.m., July 23, 1998; 8:15 a.m.-
12 noon, July 24, 1998.
    Place: The Grove Hotel, 245 South Capitol Boulevard, Boise, 
Idaho 83702, telephone 208/333-8000, FAX 208/333-8800.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: This subcommittee will advise the Advisory Committee 
for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research (ACERER) on matters 
related to community needs and will report back to the agency 
through ACERER.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items include: discussions on 
the status of current federal health agencies' responses to the 
National Cancer Institute (NCI) I-131 fallout study and the 
feasibility of additional responses that include, but not limited 
to, notification, education, screening, medical monitoring, 
additional dose assessment (other radionuclides), and epidemiology; 
and the history and progress of the Idaho National Engineering and 
Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) dose reconstruction project with a 
focus on the process of discovering, accessing, and assembling 
documentation on the emissions of radionuclides and chemicals from 
INEEL facilities.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Steven Adams, Public 
Health Advisor, Radiation Studies Branch, Division of Environmental 
Hazards and Health Effects, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S 
F-35, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-7040, FAX 770/
488-7044.

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-17764 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-067-1220-00; 8371]


California: Elimination of Dunes Vista Long Term Visitor Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office will 
eliminate Dunes Vista as one of the designated Long-Term Visitor Areas 
available in the California Desert District.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elayn Briggs, Operations Staff Chief, at the Bureau of Land Management, 
El Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th St., El Centro, CA 92243, e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#157077677c7272665576743b7779783b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="553037273c3232261536347b3739387b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (760) 337-4440.

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
Terry A. Reed,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-18069 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-40-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## ENCLOSURE II

Topics of Interest for Tribal Consultations

1- Does your Tribe have a coal-fired, oil-fired or petroleum coke-fired steam electric power plant either on the Tribal lands or nearby?

2- If so, please provide the name of the power plant and the plant’s owner.

3- Is your Tribe an owner of the plant? If so, what is the Tribe’s percent ownership?

4- Does your Tribe have an oversight role of the pow er plant? If so, please describe what role that

is.

5- Does the power plant discharge to a nearby river, stream, lake or reservoir?

a. If so, please provide the name of the wate r body that the plant discharges into.

b. If this water body on Tribal lands?

6- Does the Tribe use the waterbody?

a. If so, please describe for what purposes. Fish ing as a sport, fishing for a food source, ceremonial purposes, other types of recreation such as swimming and boating, irrigation, livestock watering, drinking water source, etc.

7- Does your Tribe have ground water drinking water we lls in the vicinity of the power plant? If, so, how many wells and how many Tribal me mbers do these serve for drinking water?

8- Has your Tribe conducted any monitoring of the ri ver, stream, lake or reservoir into which the power plant discharges?

9- Does the Tribe have its own water quality sta ndards program? If so can you describe which Tribal water quality standards apply to the water body that the power plant discharges into?

10- Has the Tribe measured water quality in the water body to determine if violations of Tribal water quality standards or other criteria have occurred?

11- Has the Tribe conducted any groundwater mon itoring to determine whether the ground water meets drinking water standards or if contam ination of the groundwater has occurred?

12- Is the power plant a source of employment for members of the Tribe? If so, please estimate the number of Tribal members employed.

13- Please describe any other manner in which the power plant affects your Tribe.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10195 Conference Calendar

BOBBY JOE BURTON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

versus DAN JOSLIN, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CV-1445

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bobby Joe Burton, Jr., federal prisoner # 75272-079, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Burton challenged the life sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture crack cocaine and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. Burton argues that his challenge to his sentence falls under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Burton’s challenge to his sentence is based on United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). A claim relying on Booker doesNo. 06-10195 -2- not meet the requirements of § 2255's savings clause. See Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing Burton’s § 2241 petition.
AFFIRMED.
From: Dave Eccleston

To: Bahner, Mark A.

Subject: RE: Aluminum sweat furnaces in MD?

Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:21:29 PM

Mark,

Thank you for your inquiry. I will have to check our website. We have not operated sweat furnaces in

years and they in general are going the way of the dinosaur in our industry. With the advent of

shredders and the eddy recovery systems the need for the large sweat furnaces are lessened. I’m not

sure if Maryland has any and if so maybe only one or two left. I would start with our national

organization as a source of information. It would have most of the large players as members. 

www.isri.org I do know that there could be many small sweat furnaces in operation in the smaller yard,

we even had one up until around 2000. These are small units that can melt items around the size of a

car rim, one at a time, and in many cases fall under any reporting or regulatory requirements.

Good luck,

Dave

David N. Eccleston, VP

Delmarva Recycling, Inc

909 Boundary Street

Salisbury, MD 21801

From: Bahner, Mark A. [mailto:bahner@rti.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:40 PM

To: Decclest@delmarvarecycling.com

Subject: Aluminum sweat furnaces in MD?

Dear Mr. Eccleston:

I work for RTI, International. My company does contract research for the U.S. EPA. We are interested

in getting an idea of the number and locations of sweat furnaces in the U.S. My understanding from

your website is that your company currently operates two sweat furnaces at your Boundary Street

location (and only at that location). Or is this incorrect?

http://delmarvarecycling.com/contact/contact.htm

Do you have any estimate of the number of sweat furnaces operating in your state or in the U.S., or

could you suggest someone to contact who might be able to estimate those numbers?

Thank you,

Mark Bahner

Research

Mark A. Bahner

RTI, International

P.O. Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194

Phone: (919) 541-6016

Fax: (919) 541-7155

Email: bahner@rti.org

Internet: http://www.rti.org
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Able Energy Inc. (the "Company"), on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Gregory D. Frost, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and Steven M. Vella, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.


/s/ Gregory D. Frost
-----------------------------
Gregory D. Frost
Chief Executive Officer
October 19, 2005


/s/ Steven M. Vella
-----------------------------
Steven M. Vella
Chief Financial Officer
October 19, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able Energy Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
No. 10-10473.

#### Yi Ching Chou, Petitioner v. Colorado.

565 U.S. 838, 132 S. Ct. 145,

181 L. Ed. 2d 63,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6319.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
# C_2016098EN.01000901.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Toshiba Corporation v European Commission

(Case C-373/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101(1) TFEU - Power transformers market - Oral market-sharing agreement (‘Gentlemen’s Agreement’) - Restriction of competition ‘by object’ - Barriers to entry - Presumption of participation in an unlawful cartel - Fines - Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) - Point 18))

(2016/C 098/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Toshiba Corporation (represented by: J. MacLennan, Solicitor, A. Schulz, Rechtsanwalt, and by J. Jourdan and P. Berghe, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek, J. Norris-Usher and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Toshiba Corporation to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Toshiba Corporation to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.

1

---