alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

 

Summary of Director Compensation

 

	
Annual   Retainer for Independent Directors:
    	
 
    	
$35,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Meeting   Fees for Independent Directors:
    	
 
    	
$1,000   per day per board or committee meeting, with a maximum fee of $2,000 for any   one day with multiple board and committee meetings
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Share   Grants for all Directors:
    	
 
    	
9,000   annually to be granted on the day of the first board meeting following the   Annual Meeting of Shareholders (or, for Directors who are first elected or   appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair   of the Audit Committee:
    	
 
    	
$17,500   per year
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair   of the Nominating and Governance Committee:
    	
 
    	
$7,500   per year
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair   of the Compensation Committee:
    	
 
    	
$7,500   per year
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
Exhibit 21




                 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                 ------------------------------


     The registrant directly or indirectly owns 100 percent of
the outstanding voting securities of the following subsidiary
companies.

           Name of Company                 Jurisdiction
           ---------------                 ------------

Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc.   Kansas
Calibrated Forms Co., Inc              Kansas
Connolly Tool and Machine Company      Delaware
Admore, Inc                            Texas
PFC Products, Inc.(1)                  Delaware
Ennis Acquisitions, Inc.               Nevada
Texas EBF, LP                          Texas
Ennis Sales, LP                        Texas
Ennis Management, LP                   Texas
Adams McClure, LP                      Texas
American Forms I, LP                   Texas
Northstar Computer Forms, Inc.         Minnesota
General Financial Supply, Inc. (2)     Iowa



     (1) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Admore, Inc.
     (2) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Computer
         Forms, Inc.



<PAGE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2696 

To provide for the establishment of a pilot program to provide grants to 

community mental health centers for the placement of social workers 

with law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. HARDER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the establishment of a pilot program to provide grants to community mental health centers for the 

placement of social workers with law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting the Health 

5 and Safety of Law Enforcement Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT. 

7 Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish a pilot 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2696 IH

1 program to provide grants to community mental health 

2 centers for the placement of social workers with law en3 forcement agencies to facilitate closer coordination on law 

4 enforcement issues with an underlying connection to men5 tal health. 

6 SEC. 3. NUMBER AND AMOUNT OF GRANTS. 

7 The Attorney General shall award not more than 4 

8 grants each fiscal year to community mental health cen9 ters (as such term is defined in section 1861 of the Social 

10 Security Act) in each of the 4 census regions. Each such 

11 grant shall be in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The 

12 term of such a grant shall be 3 years. Each such mental 

13 health center shall partner with a law enforcement agency 

14 that employs not more than 100 officers in order to carry 

15 out the purposes of the grant. 

16 SEC. 4. ELIGIBILITY FOR PLACEMENT WITH A LAW EN17 FORCEMENT AGENCY. 

18 To be eligible for placement with a law enforcement 

19 agency under this Act, a social worker shall be— 

20 (1) licensed under the applicable State law; and 

21 (2) employed by a community mental health 

22 center. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2696 IH

1 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

3 this Act $2,500,000 for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 

4 2022. 

5 SEC. 6. TERMINATION OF PROGRAM; REPORT TO CON6 GRESS. 

7 This Act is repealed on the date that is 3 years after 

8 a grant is first made under this Act. The Attorney General 

9 shall report to Congress not later than six months there10 after on the outcomes of any cases where the social worker 

11 became involved and the total number of such cases, and 

12 any other information deemed relevant. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### *State, Petitioner, v. Sundberg, Respondent,*

No. 91660-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45081-0-II, February 10, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1051. *Granted*September 30, 2015.
# DLA Distribution Tobyhanna provides oxygen tanks for hard-hit COVID-19 cities

/ Published April 22, 2020
TOBYHANNA, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania, teamed with Tobyhanna Army Depot to ship 250 oxygen tanks to the U.S Army Medical Materiel Development Activity at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and 100 tanks to Madigan Army Medical Center in Seattle. 

The oxygen tanks are being distributed to medical communities to support victims of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City and Seattle, two hard-hit U.S. cities.  

Anticipating the first major need for D-cylinder oxygen tanks would arise in the Northeast, USAMMDA purchased 350 tanks and pre-positioned them in Tobyhanna, said David Wirtz, deputy product manager for USAMMDA’s Warfighter Deployed Medical Systems Project Management Office at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

“Normally, units are sent directly from a DLA vendor to the customer, but in this situation, it wasn’t known where the units would end up,” Wirtz said. “We knew New York City was probably the likely location, and the same with Seattle, so we sent the oxygen cylinders to Tobyhanna because we knew New York would need them sooner rather than later, and Seattle could receive them a few days after.”

The TAD team asked for DDTP’s help distributing tanks it was already storing. DDTP Supervisor Michael Verton said his team quickly responded to the request. 

“The Tobyhanna Army Depot team provided us precise arrival information and worked closely with us to ensure proper receipt, all the way through shipping, where our team coordinated the shipping of these assets to the final destination, ensuring the tanks were received in a timely fashion,” he said.

Good communication and teamwork from DDTP and TAD made the mission easier to manage, added Alex Schroth from DDTP’s Retail Division.

“We cooperatively work to protect the citizens of this country every day,” he said. “Normally, our mission is to protect the citizens of our country through warfighter support. This situation gave us the opportunity to provide a different kind of support, one that is just as important given the current circumstances.”

DDTP may be called on again for COVID-19 support.  

“We plan to purchase 150 more tanks to pre-position at Tobyhanna in the event the mission evolves and additional support is needed in alternate locations due to the COVID-19 crisis,” Wirtz said.
FILED: July 3, 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 19-4620 (L)

___________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RANDY BANKS, a/k/a Dirt,

 Defendant – Appellant.

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

The court amends its opinion filed June 12, 2024, as follows:

On page 18, in the last paragraph, both references to “months’ imprisonment”

are changed to “years’ imprisonment.”

For the Court

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 19-4826 Doc: 180 Filed: 07/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 1
**Attachment v1**

**Action Item Tracker – Supply PRC 21-01 Meeting (August 25, 2021)**

**Current as of October 5, 2021**

SPRC 21-01 Minutes: https://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/DLMS/Archives/supply/ 

Page **4** of **5**
S15G1293, S15G1307.

#### STATE OF GEORGIA et al. v. SUN STATES INSURANCE GROUP, INC.; and vice versa.

(788 SE2d 346)

HINES, Presiding Justice.

This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in *State of Ga. v. Sun States Ins. Group,*332 Ga. App. 197 (770 SE2d 43) (2015), litigation involving the liquidation of an insurance company, International Indemnity Company (“IIC”), pursuant to the Insurers *490Rehabilitation and Liquidation Act1 and attempts by IIC’s sole shareholder, Sun States Insurance Group, Inc. (“Sun States”), to get monetary relief from the State of Georgia as liquidator (“State/ liquidator”) and its agents, including Regulatory Technologies, Inc. (“Reg Tech”), which assisted in the liquidation of IIC. Sun States sought, inter alia, monies, it characterized as a “surcharge,” which allegedly were wrongfully taken out of the IIC estate. The State/ liquidator unsuccessfully moved to dismiss Sun State’s claims against it, asserting that they were claims for a money judgment against the State, and thus, barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity It then filed a direct appeal of the superior court’s denial of its motion to dismiss on the basis of sovereign immunity,2 and Reg Tech joined in the appeal filed by the State/liquidator.3

Decided July 5, 2016

Reconsideration denied July 25, 2016.

*Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Daniel S. Walsh, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey W. Stump, Assistant Attorney General,*for State of Georgia.

*Barnes & Thornburg, Thomas J. Gallo, Lora R. Lerman, Brian Casey,*for Sun States Insurance Group.

The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of the superior court, and remanded the case to it; however, the Court of Appeals was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. In *Rivera v. Washington,*298 Ga. 770 (784 SE2d 775) (2016), this Court reaffirmed that the collateral order doctrine is extremely limited in its application and that it does not permit a direct appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss based upon governmental immunity Id. That was precisely the situation before the Court of Appeals. Consequently, the Court of Appeals should have dismissed the direct appeal before it for failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures. Id.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is a nullity, and we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. See *Kliesrath v. Estate of Davis,*298 Ga. 872 (786 SE2d 238) (2016).

*Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*491*Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefield, Richard L. Robbins, Alexander F. Den ton, Alexa R. Ross,*for Regulatory Technologies.

1

 See OCGA § 33-37-1 et seq.

2

 Case No. A14A2119.

3

 Case No. A14A2120.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2853]


The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls; Notice of Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection; DSP-119, Application 
for Amendment to License for Export or Import of Classified or 
Unclassified Defense Articles and Related Technical Data.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Application for Amendment to 
License for Export or Import of Classified or Unclassified Defense 
Articles and Related Technical Data.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-119.
    Respondents: Applicants for Export/Import Licenses for Classified 
and Unclassified Defense Articles.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 1,125 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed information collection and supporting documents 
may be obtained from Charles S. Cunningham, Directives Management 
Branch, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596. 
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this 
proposal. Comments should refer to the proposed survey by name and/or 
OMB Control Number and should be sent to: OMB, Ms. Victoria Wassmer, 
(202) 395-5871.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-18332 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2954 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that an order to serve 

on active duty under section 12304b of that title is treated the same 

as other orders to serve on active duty for determining the eligibility 

of members of the uniformed services for early retirement pay. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. PALAZZO (for himself and Mr. RYAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that an 

order to serve on active duty under section 12304b of 

that title is treated the same as other orders to serve 

on active duty for determining the eligibility of members 

of the uniformed services for early retirement pay. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

5 Reserves Retirement Pay Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2954 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN SERVICE ON ACTIVE 

2 DUTY TO REDUCE AGE FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR 

3 RETIRED PAY FOR NON-REGULAR SERVICE. 

4 Section 12731(f)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘under a provision of law 

6 referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) or under section 

7 12301(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘under section 12301(d) or 

8 12304b of this title or a provision of law referred to in 

9 section 101(a)(13)(B)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000764403
<NAME> E'TOWN CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      603,303
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     84,945
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          53,775
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        30,719
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 778,742
<COMMON>                                       168,356
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      (3,845)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             50,961
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 215,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                        227
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           273,427
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              44,022
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       13,481
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 220,083
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  778,742
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      145,480
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,685
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      93,832
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     105,517
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         39,963
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,006
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  40,969
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        17,826
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,143
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        813
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   22,330
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,929
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       16,217
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          36,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.70<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.66<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All amounts in thousands except per share amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**--.---------------------------------~----------------** 

### Devany, Dennis 

## (OSn From: pahjah@frontiernet.net 

## DEPT OF Sent:­ ;, MOr:lday, February 15; 2010 9:56 AM To:" i, DeVany, Dennis (OST): Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: Cape Air
.,' ". . Dear Mr. Devan)! and Swanson,

",**~** ...n., '" ';'1!'> .. I have flown with Cape Air on a numberof occasions -Albanyto Massena. The flights were on time. The personell were professional in their performance and very personable. Itwas a pleasure to flywith them. The size of their airplane is not an issue. None of the flights I've taken were sold out and there was enough room for people luggage etc. In fact, Iwish you would expand Cape Air's area of service to include Stewart International Airport in NewWindsor, NY., Orange County. Theticket price is reasonable and the number of flights provided by Cape A,irgave greaterflexibility. Please reconsider your decisIon to move to Colgan. Thank you for your consideration.....John A. Hunter

1
NO. 12-20-00262-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EAST TEXAS KIDNEY SPECIALISTS, 

P.A., RAJIV VIJ M.D., P.A. AND 

WALGREEN CO., 

APPELLANTS

V.

STEVEN GARRISON,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants, East Texas Kidney Specialists, P.A., and Rajiv Vij, M.D., P.A., filed a 

motion to dismiss this appeal. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, 

Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed AS TO East Texas Kidney 

Specialists, P.A. and Rajiv Vij M.D., P.A. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs are taxed 

against the party incurring same. This dismissal does not affect the appeal filed by Walgreen Co.

Opinion delivered December 22, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 22, 2020

NO. 12-20-00262-CV

EAST TEXAS KIDNEY SPECIALISTS, P.A.,

RAJIV VIJ M.D., P.A. AND WALGREEN CO.,

Appellants

V.

STEVEN GARRISON,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Gregg County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2020-761-CCL2)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellants East Texas Kidney 

Specialists, P.A., and Rajiv Vij, M.D., P.A., to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being 

considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion 

to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed as to East Texas Kidney Specialists, P.A.,

and Rajiv Vij, M.D., P.A., and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

All costs are taxed against the party incurring same. This dismissal does not affect the appeal 

filed by Walgreen Co.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-258-000]


Sabine Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1998, Sabine Pipe Line Company 
(Sabine) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
August 1, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 285
Second Revised Sheet No. 286

    Sabine states that the instant filing reflects changes to Sabine's 
Tariff required to more closely reflect the requirements of Sections 
250.16 and 161.3(f) of the Commission's regulations regarding the 
reporting of information related to the transportation of natural gas 
on Sabine's system with respect to Sabine's marketing affiliate.
    Sabine states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its 
customers, state commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commissin's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17904 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M