alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36670-36671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2624-000]


Duke Energy New Smyrna Beach Power Company Ltd., L.L.P.; Notice 
of Issuance of Order

June 30, 1998.
    Duke Energy New Smyrna Beach Power Company Ltd., L.L.P. (Duke New 
Smyrna), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Duke Energy 
Corporation, filed an application requesting Commission authorization 
to sell electric capacity and energy at market-based rates, and for 
certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, Duke New Smyrna 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities 
by Duke New Smyrna. On June 25, 1998, the Commission issued an Order 
Accepting For Filing Proposed Tariffs For Market-Based Power Sales And 
Reassignment Of Transmission Capacity

[[Page 36671]]

(Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 25, 1998 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (G), (H), and (J):
    (G) Within 30 days of the date of this order any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of issuances 
of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Duke New Smyrna should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (H) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (G) above, Duke New Smyrna is hereby authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Duke New Smyrna, compatible 
with the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for 
such purposes.
    (J) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Duke New 
Smyrna's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 27, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17880 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7837.

#### Clifford Eugene Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 971,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 261.

178 L. Ed. 2d 798,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 467.
No. 65, Original.

#### State of Texas, Plaintiff v. State of New Mexico.

565 U.S. 809, 132 S. Ct. 81,

181 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6683.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of *13expenses granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $6,885.82 for the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, to be paid equally by the parties.
No. 10-6297.

#### Rodney C. Bryan, Petitioner v. South Carolina.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 903,

178 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 470.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
No. 10-5824.

#### Jerry Lynn Taylor, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 986,

178 L. Ed. 2d 814,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 519.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 968, 131 S. Ct. 471, 178 L. Ed. 2d 299, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8057.
#### State, Respondent, v. Almanzor, Petitioner,

No. 92243-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46248-6-II, July 10, 2015. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
No. 10-7279.

#### Jerry W. Armstrong, Petitioner v. Redding Parole Department, et al.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 931,

178 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 357,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas L. Monahan III

Thomas L. Monahan IIIChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2008/s/ Timothy R. Yost

Timothy R. YostChief Financial OfficerAugust 8, 2008
 23
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18188]



[[Page 37102]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-245-001]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, High Island Offshore System 
(HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective August 
1, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 110C

    HIOS asserts that the purpose of this filing is to correct an 
inadvertent error in pagination in its June 10, 1998 filing to comply 
with the Commission's Order No. 587-G in Docket No. RM96-1-007. That 
order requires pipelines to comply with the adoption of Version 1.2 of 
the GISB standards (284.10(b)) and the standards regarding the posting 
of information on websites and retention of electronic information 
(284.10(c)(3) (ii) through (v)).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18188 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### People v SP

2d Dept: 134 AD3d 957 (Dutchess)

denied 8/2/16 (Fahey, J.)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20461

KENYON INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MARK MALCOLM; GRADY BRAY; RONALD CRANE, JR; DISASTER

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; BRAY ASSOCIATES;

CRISIS HUMAN SERVICES, INC; MARJORIE BRAY; LEAH HAWLEY;

KATHY ROCK; JAMES FAIRBROTHER; SHARON FAIRBROTHER,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CV-3550

Before GARWOOD, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 7, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20461 Document: 00511438418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2011
Workbook Contents

Product Supplied for Total Crude Oil and Petroleum Products 

Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data

Worksheet Name Description

Data 1 Product Supplied for Total Crude Oil and Petroleum Products 

Release Date: 9/27/2013

Next Release Date: 9/26/2014

Excel File Name: pet_cons_psup_a_ep00_vpp_mbbl_a.xls

Available from Web Page: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_a_ep00_vpp_mbbl_a.htm

Source: Energy Information Administration

For Help, Contact: infoctr@eia.gov

(202) 586-8800
# Of Series Frequency Latest Data for

6 Annual 2012 6/30/1981

12/24/2013 3:43:07 PM
Back to Contents Data 1: Product Supplied for Total Crude Oil and Petroleum Products 

Sourcekey MTTUPUS1 MTTUPP11 MTTUPP21

Date

U.S. Product 

Supplied of Crude 

Oil and Petroleum 

Products (Thousand 

Barrels)

East Coast (PADD 1) 

Product Supplied of 

Crude Oil and 

Petroleum Products 

(Thousand Barrels)

Midwest (PADD 2) 

Product Supplied of 

Crude Oil and 

Petroleum Products 

(Thousand Barrels)

1981 5861058 1916204 1557772

1982 5582938 1803779 1501875

1983 5559364 1775346 1490800

1984 5755575 1782750 1547238

1985 5740143 1750617 1549578

1986 5942429 1891814 1514908

1987 6082742 1932706 1493510

1988 6325692 1993435 1558822

1989 6323681 1988200 1556967

1990 6200801 1866277 1544887

1991 6100550 1776364 1523561

1992 6234025 1822417 1592780

1993 6291407 1836409 1655292

1994 6467128 1872129 1695214

1995 6469475 1935733 1694699

1996 6701059 2011956 1732219

1997 6796411 2024716 1761241

1998 6904756 2092561 1759457

1999 7124558 2123452 1823251

2000 7210594 2147866 1819350

2001 7171777 2159189 1793410

2002 7212876 2142315 1821004

2003 7312229 2282390 1837527

2004 7587601 2355353 1893941

2005 7592789 2389101 1928904

2006 7550908 2276240 1903082

2007 7548338 2283295 1872023

2008 7136255 2141967 1821601

2009 6851561 2047766 1745545

2010 7000746 2048003 1779973

2011 6891956 1988860 1747485

2012 6767418 1909011 1757194
and Petroleum Products 

MTTUPP31 MTTUPP41 MTTUPP51

Gulf Coast (PADD 3) 

Product Supplied of 

Crude Oil and 

Petroleum Products 

(Thousand Barrels)

Rocky Mountain 

(PADD 4) Product 

Supplied of Crude 

Oil and Petroleum 

Products (Thousand 

Barrels)

West Coast (PADD 5) 

Product Supplied of 

Crude Oil and 

Petroleum Products 

(Thousand Barrels)

1308909 198394 879780

1251698 190793 834792

1262297 185148 845773

1356347 187583 881659

1350666 189403 899626

1406849 188636 940221

1507434 187201 961892

1571367 192289 1008776

1590312 193913 994289

1598840 193821 996977

1622250 200632 977743

1651813 201090 965791

1628838 207917 962951

1711765 206163 981858

1650174 210474 978396

1726823 214207 1015854

1782812 216219 1011423

1792598 213404 1046736

1904254 229418 1044183

1935339 239743 1068296

1894004 233307 1091867

1897215 236533 1115808

1840054 239502 1112756

1953129 251235 1133943

1885891 234709 1154183

1953171 246789 1171625

1963566 248798 1180657

1806972 246985 1118731

1784953 234910 1038387

1869294 243896 1059580

1872028 248438 1035146

1841613 252667 1006933
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    6,440
<SECURITIES>                                              8,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                            29,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                                573
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         45,490
<PP&E>                                                   15,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (5,222)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          283,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    49,893
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     32
<OTHER-SE>                                              222,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            283,711
<SALES>                                                  34,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         34,800
<CGS>                                                     7,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            44,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (9,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                (21)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (9,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (9,868)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.39)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 135O,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PocketSpec Technologies Inc.
the  "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report').  I, Cynthia Kettl, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

               (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


           By: /s/ Cynthia Kettl
               -----------------------------------------
                  Cynthia Kettl, Chief Financial Officer


           Dated: 6/13/03
No. 10-662.

#### Asworth, LLC, fka Asworth Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Kentucky Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet, fka Revenue Cabinet.

562 U.S. 1200, 131 S. Ct. 1046,

178 L. Ed. 2d 865,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1056,

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, April 29, 2016*

*Change 7*

**AP7.30. APPENDIX 7.30**

**HAZARDOUS WASTE/MATERIAL CODE**

	AP7.30-1	APPENDIX 7.30
# C_2013123EN.01001702.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/17

---

Action brought on 12 February 2013 — Herdade de S. Tiago II/OHIM — Polo/Lauren (V)

(Case T-90/13)

2013/C 123/29

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herdade de S. Tiago II-Sociedade Agrícola, SA (Lisboa, Portugal) (represented by: I. de Carvalho Simões and J. Pimenta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Polo/Lauren Company, LP (New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Grant the appeal and annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 28 November 2012 in Case R 1436/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant the appeal and annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 28 November 2012 in Case R 1436/2010-2;

| — | Order the respondent to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before the General Court, including those of the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the respondent to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before the General Court, including those of the appellant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark representing a polo player on horseback and the word element ‘V’ for goods and services in classes 3, 18, 25, 28, 41 and 43 — Community trade mark application 5 791 835

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration, UK trade mark registration and Benelux trade mark registration of the figurative mark representing a polo player for goods in classes 9, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25 et 28

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-1424.

#### Gerardo Delgado, Petitioner v. City of Riverside, California, et al.

565 U.S. 820, 132 S. Ct. 105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6604.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.
No. 10-1356.

#### Tu My Tong, Petitioner v. Fred Rucker.

565 U.S. 818, 132 S. Ct. 99,

181 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6662.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
IN REPLY
REFER TO

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2533
FT. BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

DLMSO OCT 17 196

MEMORANDUM FOR: DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS) Supply
Process Review Committee Meeting, November 19-21, 1996

Under the requirement of the DLMS, DoD 4000.25-M, Volume 1,
Chapter 1, we have scheduled a meeting of the Supply PRC to include
topics covered under the basic MILSTRIP, DoD 4000.25-1-M. The
meeting will begin at 0800 on November 19, 1996 and will conélude
at 1600 on November 21, 1996. The meeting will be held at the
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Headquarters Complex, Fort Belvoir,
VA, conference room 2501. [All visitors must use ENTRANCE B.] The
Supply PRC meeting agenda is provided as Attachment 1. The
directions and hotel recommendations are provided as Attachment 2.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss DLSS/DLMS Change 9,
Validation of Force or Activity Designator (F/AD) I Activities;
Proposed DLMS Change 1, DD Form 1348-1B, Issue Release/Receipt
Document, and DD Form 1348-2A, Issue Release/Receipt Document with
Address Label; Proposed MILSTRIP Change (PMC) 40, Processing
Cooperative Logistics Supply Support Arrangement (CLSSA)
Requisitions; standardization of MILSTRAP management codes; and the
cancellation of the: DD Form 1348-1, DoD Single Line Item Release/
Receipt Document (not for use beyond November 1996).

The Supply PRC Chair is Ms. Ellen Hilert, DLMSO, DSN 427-6117,
(703) 767-6117, or e-mail: ellen_hilert@hq.dla.mil. The DoD
MILSTRIP System Administrator is Ms. Vermella Savage, DLMSO, DSN
427-6127, (703) 767-6127, or e-mail: vermella_savage@hq.dla.mil.
You may direct additional topic suggestions or comments to either
Ms. Hilert or Ms. Savage.

Aiyepli0u
ES A. JOHNSON
Director
Defense Logistics Management
Standards Office

Attachments E nA
Federal Recycling Program ud Printed on Recycled Paper

SF NES MRANYAMYNARANMANAR ABABA ARRAS NSIS NACE I SNA ES ANN
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC. 

v. 

CITY OF BURLINGTON, 

VERMONT 

Complainant, 

Resnondent 

FAA Docket No.16-14-06 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the 

above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, 

subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is 

hereby extended to February 24, 2017. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

. Willis, Director 

Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 18, 2017, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document addressed to: 

FOR RESPONDENT 

Pablo 0. Nuesch 

Anjali G. Patel 

Spiegel and McDiarmid, LLP 

1875 Eye Street, N.W. 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

FOR COMPLAINANT 

Benjamin H. Klein 

Gross & Klein LLP 

Pier 9, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-600 

FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-1 00 

FAA Regional Office, ANE 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
No. 10-1427.

#### Ray Schumacher, Jr., Petitioner v. Tom Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 821, 132 S. Ct. 105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6948.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 405 Fed. Appx. 290.