alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--[if lt IE 8]>      <html class="no-js nav theme-blue lt-ie10 lt-ie9 lt-ie8  noLinking " lang="en-us"> <![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 8]>         <html class="no-js nav theme-blue lt-ie10 lt-ie9  noLinking " lang="en-us"> <![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 9]>         <html class="no-js nav theme-blue lt-ie10  noLinking " lang="en-us"> <![endif]-->
<!--[if !IE]><!-->     <html class="no-js nav theme-blue  noLinking " lang="en-us" > <!--<![endif]-->	
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8" />
                		<title>CDC - State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System - Smoking & Tobacco Use</title>
        		
                <meta name="keywords" content="STATE, STATE System, state tobacco data, state smoking data, tobacco data, smoking data, tobacco states, smoking stats, tobacco data maps, tobacco data map, smoking data maps, tobacco data fact sheets, smoking data fact sheets, smoking, tobacco use, tobacco, use, secondhand smoke, second hand smoke, publications, data, statistics, health effects, quit smoking, stop smoking, cessation, prevention, industry, products, chewing, smokeless, youth, publication, products, quick links" />		<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
		        <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="144x144" href="/TemplatePackage/3.0/images/cdc-touch-icon-144x144.png" />
        <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="114x114" href="/TemplatePackage/3.0/images/cdc-touch-icon-114x114.png" />
        <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" sizes="72x72" href="/TemplatePackage/3.0/images/cdc-touch-icon-72x72.png" />
        <link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" href="/TemplatePackage/3.0/images/cdc-touch-icon-57x57.png" />
        <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/TemplatePackage/3.0/images/favicon.ico" />	
		
		<meta name="robots" content="index,follow" />
		<meta property="cdc:template_version" content="3.0" />
		<meta property="cdc:content-id" content="676790"/>
		<meta property="cdc:revision-id" content="4"/>
				<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/statesystem/index.htm"/>
				<!-- Internal Release Version # 3.7 -->
         

<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=http://www.cdc.gov/STATESystem">
                  </head>
        <body>
        </body>
		</html>
No. 10-5490.

#### Derek Merchant, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 819,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9677.

178 L. Ed. 2d 561,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 172.
To who it may concern: 

As a concerned citizen of the San Joaquin Valley I am troubled by the fact 

the EPA is grandfathering in the power plant in Avenal, CA. The San Joaquin 

valley is a region that already has high cases of asthma and has multiple 

cities in the top 10 of bad air quality in the nation. With this being the case, 

the highest and newest standards must be adhered to in order to keep its 

citizens healthy. Please reconsider and DO NOT grandfather in the Avenal 

power plant. 

Sincerely, 

Helen C Palmer 

 

Avenal Power Plant 

Helen Chavarria 

to: 

R9AirPermits 

04/12/2011 10:44 PM 

Hide Details 

From: Helen Chavarria 

To: R9AirPermits@EPA 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Page 1 of 1

4/14/2011
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

 HEADQUARTERS

 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

 FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

 December 16, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OF RECORD

SUBJECT: Administrative Defense Logistics Management Standards Change 1450, 

Administrative Update DLMS 846R Location Reconciliation Request Note

 The attached approved administrative change is effective immediately. This 

administrative change does not change or eliminate any existing procedures or add any new 

procedures. 

The Defense Enterprise Data Standards Office (DEDSO) point of contact is Mr. Rafael 

Gonzalez, e-mail: DEDSO.SUPPLY@dla.mil. 

Attachment:

As stated

cc:

DLA J6DS
Attachment, MFR ADC 1450

Page 1 

Approved Defense Logistics Management Change 1450

Administrative Update DLMS 846R Location Reconciliation Request 

Note - MFR

1. ORIGINATING SERVICE/AGENCY AND POC INFORMATION: Defense Enterprise 

Data Standards Office (DEDSO), Rafael Gonzalez, email: DEDSO.SUPPLY@dla.mil. 

2. REASON FOR CHANGE:

a. Bottom Line Up-Front: This administrative change removes the Defense Logistics 

Management Standards (DLMS) 846R Location Reconciliation Request transaction note located 

in segment REF02/140 for the lot/segment number. REF02/140 should contain the value related 

to the code in REF01/140. The note is misleading because lot/segment is not a code in the 

REF01/140. 

b. Background: The Defense Automated Addressing System (DAAS) implementation 

team identified a syntax error in the DLMS 846R Location Reconciliation Request transaction 

during a DAAS mapping review. The current DLMS note is incorrect because lot/segment is not 

a code in the REF01/140. 

3. CHANGE IN DETAIL: 

a. Technical Details: Remove the note for the DLMS 846R Location Reconciliation 

Request associated with REF01/140 for the lot/segment identifier. 

b. Revised Transaction Flow: No impact to the Location Reconciliation Request 

transaction process flow.

4. TECHNICAL IMPACT: 

a. Additions or Changes to Data Elements: Not applicable. 

b. Automated Information Systems (AIS): No impact to Component systems. The 

removed note references a non-existence code. 

5. PUBLICATION/POLICY IMPACT: 

a. Defense Logistics Manual (DLM) 4000.25: No impact to DLMS publications.

b. Non-DLM 4000.25 Publications: No impact to non-DLM publications. 

6. REFERENCES: Not applicable.
Enclosure, MFR ADC 1450

Page 1 

Enclosure 

Update the DLMS 846R the Location Reconciliation Request transaction as shown below. 

# Location DLMS 846R Location Reconciliation Request Reason

1. DLMS 

Introductory 

Note

Add ADC 1450 to DLMS Introductory Note 5:

- ADC 1450, Administrative Update DLMS 846R 

Location Reconciliation Request Note 

Adds change to the 

introductory note. 

2. 2/REF02/140 Remove the DLMS Note in REF02 Reference 

Identifier. 

Reference Identification

DLMS Note: DLMS users enter the

lot/segment number of the segment 

transactions being reconciled; otherwise,

leave blank.

Remove DLMS note 

identified. The note 

points to a nonexistent condition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

QUIN HARRY MARTIN

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 175 DB 2017 (No. 2 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 60102

( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of February

, 201 8 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 24, 2018 , is approved and it is ORDERED

that Quin Harry Martin

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Gordon S. Donovan, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this special financial report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-2 of ViskaseCompanies, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether material or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: April 6, 2005   /s/ Gordon S. Donovan      Gordon S. Donovan  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, Fred Montano,  Chief Executive Officer of Falcon Ridge
Development, Inc.,  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








1.
            the
      annual report on Form 10-Q of Falcon Ridge Development Inc., for the
      period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon
      Ridge Development Inc.





Date:
July 6, 2009





/s/ Fred
Montano


Fred
Montano the President and


Chief
Executive Officer of Falcon Ridge Development, Inc.
# C_2016038EN.01001402.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/14

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2015 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie

(Case C-517/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agriculture - Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications - Registration of the designation ‘Edam Holland’ - Producers using the name ‘Edam’ - Absence of a legal interest in bringing proceedings))

(2016/C 038/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima, J. Guillem Carrau and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (represented by: P. van Ginneken and G. Béquet, advocaten)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. shall pay the costs.

| 3. | The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26 of 26.1.2015.

1

---
#### *State, Respondent, v. McClure, Petitioner,*

No. 91176-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70516-4-1, November 17, 2014, 184 Wn. App. 1034. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
**DoD 4000.25-1-M,***April 28, 2004*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP6.15 APPENDIX 6.15**

**MESSAGE REQUEST FOR SPECIALMATERIEL OBLIGATION VALIDATION**

FROM:  {INSERT ADDRESS OF INITIATOR}

TO:  {INSERT ADDRESSEE}

SUBJECT:  MILSTRIP SPECIAL MATERIEL OBLIGATION VALIDATION REQUEST

1. REQUEST SPECIAL RECONCILIATION AND VALIDATION OF NEED FOR ITEM HELD AS MATERIEL OBLIGATION AT THIS ACTIVITY.

	A.  DOCUMENT NUMBER {ENTER REQUISITION NUMBER}.

	B.  STOCK OR PART NO.  {ENTER NUMBER BEING REVIEWED}.

	C.  QUANTITY {ENTER QUANTITY ON BACKORDER}.

	D.  PD {ENTER PRIORITY DESIGNATOR OF REQUISITION}.

	E.  SHIP TO {IF OTHER THAN ADDRESSEE, ENTER DODAAC}.

2.  REQUEST REPLY BY {ENTER A DATE 15 DAYS BEYOND THE DATE OF THIS REQUEST} INDICATING QUANTITY TO BE RETAINED AS A MATERIEL OBLIGATION.  IF REPLY IS NOT RECEIVED BY THIS DATE, THE OBLIGATION QUANTITY WILL BE CANCELED.

**SAMPLE**

**2**

APPENDIX 1.15

AP6.15-1

APPENDIX 6.15
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00358

- CR

Perla Judith PENA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

F rom the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- CRS

- 440

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

State ’ s brief is deemed filed as of June 11, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 23(A)****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-130487,333-110194 and 33-37692 on Form S-8 and No. 333-17295 on Form S-8 and S-3 of our reports datedAugust 10, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Electro Rent Corporation andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing orincorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electro Rent Corporation for theyear ended May 31, 2007./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPLos Angeles, California
BEFORE THE COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION
 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO COMMON·
 

PROVISIONS REGULATIONS REGARDING "UPSET PROVISIONS"
 

PREHEARING ORDER FOR DECEMBER 14-15,2006, RULEMAKING 

HEARING 

A prehearing conference for this rulemaking was held on November 15,2006, before 

Commissioner Peterson as the Prehearing Officer. This prehearing order identifies and 

summarizes the issues raised and allocates time allowed for presentations by each of the 

parties. 

Parties to the Rulemaking Hearing 

The parties to the rulemaking hearing are: 

•	 Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry, represented by Dennis L. 

Arfmann & Jennifer L. Morris, Hogan & Hartson; and Donald Shandy, Ryan, 

Whaley & Coldiron, P.c. 

•	 Colorado Utilities Coalition for Clean Air, Platte River Power Authority, Tri-State 

Generation and Transmission Association, Inc., and Public Service Company of 

Colorado; represented by Jim Sanderson, Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite 

•	 Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action, Environmental Integrity Project, St. Vrain 

Valley Community Watchdogs, Mothers Against Burning Tires, and Friends of 

the St. Vrain River Valley, represented by Jeremy Nichols, Rocky Mountain 

Clean Air Action 

•	 Colorado Petroleum Association, represented by Dennis L. Arfmann & Jennifer 

L. Morris, Hogan & Hartson and Stan Dempsey, Colorado Petroleum Association 

•	 Rocky Mountain Steel Mills, represented by Eugene Megyesy, Jr., Dufford & 

BrownP.C. 

•	 Colorado Ready Mix Concrete Association and The Colorado Rock Products 

Association, represented by Jeff Schwarz, Carver Kirchhoff Schwarz 

The Air Pollution Control Division functions as staff to the Commission in the 

rulemaking process. Kirsten King of the Division and Tom Roan of the Attorney 

General's Office represent the Division in this proceeding.
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012
**Item 16**

Id entify all persons, including employ ees, consultants, representatives of the taconite industry , or representatives of air pollution control manufacturers, who assisted in the preparation, or were consulted for the purpose of preparing, the BART report. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Chrissy Bartovich
**Answer:** The Keetac BART report was written b y Barr Engineering, who also wrote BART rep orts for other taconite facilities. Below is a list of individuals from U. S. Steel and Barr who worked on the subject report. MPCA staff who were consulted during the course of writing the report are not included. This list may not be all inclusive, bu t it is the best information we have available after going through information from 2006. Individuals listed were employ ees of the companies at the time of the BART report. Since that time some have moved to other companies or retired. For U. S. Steel those individuals who are still employ ed b y the compan y have been identified with the word “active” after their name.
U. S. Steel: Chrissy Bartovich

– active Kevin Py lka Ray Potts Bill Kubiak Scott Vagle

– active Barr Engineering: Erik Boleman Andrew Sk oglund Joel Trinkle Tony Shoberg George Pruchnofski Mike Hansel Beth Havlik Jack Kenned y
No. 10-1417.

#### Fein, Such, Kahn and Shepard, PC, Petitioner v. Dorothy Rhue Allen.

565 U.S. 810, 132 S. Ct. 82,

181 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6671.

October 3, 2011.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 364.
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB/A of  the Company for the  quarter
ended June 30, 2006 , as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                      /s/   Inti Shaikh
                      ---------------------------
                      Inti Shaikh
                      CEO
                     (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  January 14, 2008



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB/A of  the Company for the  quarter
ended June 30, 2006, as amended,  (the Report) fully complies with  the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                        VOTE POWER CORPORATION
                        /S/ Inti Shaikh
                        ----------------------------
                        Inti Shaikh
                        Secretary/Treasurer
                        (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:  January 14, 2008
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Emerson Radio Corp., (the Company) for the period
ended March 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Duncan Hon, Chief Executive Officer, and Andrew L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



By:

/s/ Duncan HonDuncan HonChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Andrew L. DavisAndrew L. DavisChief Financial Officer


Dated: July 29, 2014

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State, Respondent, v. Belousov, Petitioner,

No. 92162-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 46563-9-II, July 31, 2015. *Denied*February 10, 2015.
No. 10-1430.

#### Lawrence W. Trull, Petitioner v. Francis D. Smolka, et al.

565 U.S. 821, 132 S. Ct. 106,

181 L. Ed. 2d 33,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6760.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 651.