alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                                                                                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of R.H. Donnelley Corporation as of the
    dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                                                                                        |  |                                                                                    |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ David C. SwansonDavid
    C. Swanson
    Chief Executive Officer
    March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Steven M. Blondy
Steven M. BlondySVP and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2005
# C_2015127EN.01000501.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/5

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Roberto Siddu

(Case C-478/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National rules - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Compelling reasons of general interest - Proportionality))

(2015/C 127/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Roberto Siddu

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders concerning licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past on account of a reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Equity Oil Company, a Colorado corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                               |  |                        
|------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                               |  | /s/ Russell V. Florence
|Russell V. Florence, Treasurer
|and Chief Financial Officer   
|March 15, 2004
# C_2013108EN.01003002.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/30

---

Action brought on 5 February 2013 — Novartis/OHMI (CARE TO CARE)

(Case T-68/13)

2013/C 108/76

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 29 November 2012 — R 953/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 29 November 2012 — R 953/2012-1;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Design) to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Design) to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CARE TO CARE’ for services in classes 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 10 224 657

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# I am DLA

/ Published April 20, 2016
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 

### **My name is:**

Wallan Hashimoto.

### **I am:**

A management and program analyst for DLA Disposition Services Pacific.

### D**escribe your job in a sentence:**

For the Pacific Region office, which links headquarters and field sites throughout the region, I help manage resources such as finance, travel, training, personnel and support agreements that help sites provide world-class service to the warfighter. 

### **How long have you worked at DLA?**

I’ve worked for DLA Disposition Services six years, beginning as a student summer hire. After earning my master’s, I was picked up full-time as a property disposal tech, later got into the DLA Corporate Intern Program and eventually moved into my current job.

### **What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**

I really enjoy helping customers. At field sites, the primary customer is the warfighter, but we also provide excess property to federal, state and local agencies. One day I’d get a call from a sheriff’s office asking about flashlights. Another day we had the local Air National Guard needing a medical gurney. Or we’d be helping schools get computers. You never knew what the day would bring. 

### **What are your best memories of working here?**

My coworkers. At every place I’ve worked at DLA, there’s been a sense of family. At every stage, I’ve met smart, innovative, generous people who go the extra distance to make you feel part of the team. That’s what sets DLA apart from other organizations I’ve worked for. I’ve always felt our work is serving a larger purpose — a commitment to help each other and others. Now that I work daily with folks from Energy, Installation Support, Troop Support, Distribution and DLA Pacific, I see how the PFLAs help support the warfighter in the Asia-Pacific region.

### **How do you make a difference?**

I try to treat everyone how I would want to be treated, how I would want a family member to be treated — with respect, integrity and kindness. When I deal with our folks on an isolated base in Northern Japan, I keep in mind I’m their contact with HQ multiple time zones away. Or if we have an employee deployed to the area who has questions or is trying to arrange training here so others don’t have to fly halfway around the world. I’m very aware that without help from others, I couldn’t support our folks who directly support the warfighter.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2510

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude certain bank products

from the definition of a deposit.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude

certain bank products from the definition of a deposit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Insurance Fund

5 and Depositor Protection Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DEPOSIT.

7 Section 3(l)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

8 (12 U.S.C. 1813(l)(5)) is amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

10 the end;
2

•S 2510 IS

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(C) any liability of an insured depository

6 institution that arises under an annuity con7 tract, the income on which is tax deferred

8 under section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code

9 of 1986.’’.

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

12 any liability of an insured depository institution that

13 arises under an annuity contract issued on or after Octo14 ber 6, 1994.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        4
        
        5
        
        6
        
        7
        
        8 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
11j 1 n-tJS t&tL ' .. ·f RECEIVED IN (a- \1- 2Dl6 

• COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

----~~E~~~~J£~~~~------~J~UN~~~2D1~5-------- -vs. S+ ~" ~ 0 ...{ .'\bet Acosta, CterJt ___ ,~dXL_O_J"_/.E.'Xa5'---------------

---1-ik Q£a~l)~ ~> l£+it~_is_:1_ Pc+t1i_o~-~-Whlti~~ ---J-li_lbd_a_Wl2it_o.L~as_Cu_BQ_us_be.etmb.Eg_1!o_1.D_t2_wA\tt_ 

-----t-2k3_ed_D_is~d_\Lo_o}_o~_B_a(L(LisJ:oDl.jkarud_ffiilaEAb.aM_ 

-e--~-=35~d._ahD_S_b_aub_E.\a2tEd_o_£ ~±A.m£_~~w_Qilof_bah~-

---i-'="C.D=-~-e_os_\~_to_bE~dlLdEd_Ao ±b:6. TLL.~-0 fu b:\ioJSclL_ 

----~--bllid_a_Wci±_o~~~s_L.-2D-2.0\3_.~le.CA_ffirl.E~_ 

-----~-~·~·--~-COD_~_to_QI-.5.Q_a~_fu ~-1-J1Jh-t:OS_lo_~PJS5_LLOJ __ 

i----f·l{la£fb_1_Q_'LO_G.~-Cll~_W_B-J~LJL8-o L 1ht sJ:c.i:£_Q£_s~o~_ 

l---f-±o._~Qoili:£Jb·c.tt: ~-a.~_j_55U£d__\]j_L CG.tr~C£ch_2]_2.QJ3 

l---t~i-~cA..81Ud_b~waoAEd_bLEva_6 Flno:£s _Ass \56u+ 

l----~-f}~_~lt~c~-\~~al~c.a.J~D.~{£_11±t_o_u£Q£~ 

l----~-~~_ffiu~~_\_i-GOOM£_M~.tldJ.n-- ~J;~l£A.d.au11 __ 

1---tad.drusss lhl.~_ai \E.~ai1:GJ.S_6t \_~.Yc.i~_ut_~,s~o:L 

, ___ --~-CillmEL. 1~:al(X)u~'b \_ct_d_~ot_s_ubrYtit_&~± '-~\+.-'-­

, __ -1--"\J ~.~_\~l_YLC2:SJ~_.1haSch::,o_'LC>\n_:\D_~_Qc~ :h-~­

,_---t-nas_~Dt_\1EciB.tled_a_~.S-~D~_oL4E_S±m:& PuB_Q.a~­

-•--~-B-~_t\)_~_o_&,_t&:lblD~-bas~_\N_~~-L£_\1okEa£_Cnu.e.us_o. ol_ 

1---1-00-~Jn T CGA.~uu ~--tiOt£J'LtitaNi\~j-~.--
•
EXHIBIT 10.35
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
          This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is made effective as of the 12th day ofDecember, 2003 and is intended to amend a certain Employment Agreement (the“Agreement”) by and between Erie Indemnity Company and Jan R. Van Gordereffective as of December 16, 1997.
          WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of theCompany and its Shareholders to secure the continued employment of theExecutive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and
          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has previously consideredand agreed to extend the term of the Agreement from its original term; and
          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of December9, 2003 has again agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for a period ofone (1) additional year as contained herein; and
          WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.
          NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree asfollows:
          1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby amendedby extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2005.
          2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full forceand effect.         ATTEST:       ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY               /s/ Jeffrey A. Ludrof By: /s/ F. William Hirt  Jeffrey A. Ludrof     F. William Hirt  President & CEO     Chairman of the Board         WITNESS:                     /s/ Sheila M. Hirsch   /s/ Jan R. Van Gorder  Sheila M. Hirsch     Jan R. Van Gorder  Executive Secretary     6796 Manchester Beach Rd.        Fairview, PA 16415
24
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-10-16-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
become, effective July 1, 1998:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 9

    National asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's order issued February 16, 1996, in Docket Nos. RP94-
367-000, et. al. Under Article I, Section 4, of the settlement approved 
in that order, National must redetermine quarterly the Amortization 
Surcharge to reflect revisions in the Plant to be Amortized, interest 
and associated taxes, and a change in the determinants. The 
recalculation produced an Amortization Surcharge of 11.29 cents per 
dth.
    Further, National states that under Article II, Section 2, of the 
settlement, it is required to recalculate the maximum Interruptible 
Gathering (IG) rate monthly and to charge that rate on the first day of 
the following month if the result is an IG rate more than 2 cents above 
or below the IG rate as calculated under Section 1 of Article II. The 
recalculation produced an IG Rate of 11 cents per dth.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18361 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy
[FE Docket No. 92-123-NG]


San Diego Gas & Electric; Order Amending Long-Term Authorization 
To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy 
(DOE) gives notice that it issued DOE/FE Order No. 717-A on June 2, 
1998, amending San Diego Gas & Electric's long-term authorization to 
import natural gas from Canada granted in DOE/FE Opinion and Order 717 
(Order 717)(1 FE para. 70,674, November 13, 1992). Order 717 was 
amended to decrease the maximum import volume from 53,150 Mcf of 
natural gas per day to 31,500 Mcf per day.
    This order may be found on the FE web site at <a href="http://
www.fe.doe.gov">http://
www.fe.doe.gov</a>., or on our electronic bulletin board at (202) 586-7853. 
It is also available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities Docket Room, 3E-
033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20585-0334, (202) 586-9478. The Docket Room is open between the 
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., June 11, 1998.
John W. Glynn,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 98-16656 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 10-7947.

#### Liang Yang, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1028,

178 L. Ed. 2d 850,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 706.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 859.
# C_2015320EN.01000301.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/3

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 April 2015 — Sven A. von Storch v European Central Bank (ECB)

(Case C-64/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Person directly concerned - Decisions adopted by the European Central Bank - Guideline 2012/641/EU of the European Central Bank - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court))

(2015/C 320/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Sven A. von Storch (represented by: M. Kerber, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: C. Kroppenstedt and G. Gruber, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Sven A. von Storch and the 5  216 other appellants, whose names are listed in the annex to this order, shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Sven A. von Storch and the 5  216 other appellants, whose names are listed in the annex to this order, shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-4084, styled State of Texas v. John Rich, in the 144th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00656-CR

IN RE John RICH

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 15, 2009, relator John Rich filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to

compel the trial court to rule on his pro se “Motion for Invoking 6th Amendment Right to Self

Representation.” 

However, on October 26, 2009, the trial court ruled on relator’s motion. Therefore, we

DENY AS MOOT relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 10-604.

#### Victor D. Moseley, et ux., Petitioners v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1003,

178 L. Ed. 2d 827,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 893,

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 382.