alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### *State, Respondent, v. Ivie, Petitioner,*

No. 91718-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44258-2-II, April 21, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1008. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of Elscint Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Uri Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: July 14, 2005

                                                By: /s/ Uri Levin
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                Name: Uri Levin
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)


                                     -104-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cleveland Walker, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 376]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered June 29, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he received the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Ramos,*282 AD2d 622 [2001]; *People v Sinclair,*266 AD2d 482 [1999]). A defendant is entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect one *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]). Mere losing tactics are not to be confused with ineffectiveness, and to sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, proof of less than meaningful representation is required, rather than disagreement with *657counsel’s strategies and tactics *(see People v Benevento, supra; People v Sinclair, supra,*at 482).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
No. 09-10685.

#### Roy Williams, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1055, 131 S. Ct. 627,

178 L. Ed. 2d 455,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8941.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 98, 178 L. Ed. 2d 62, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6076.
22 Days of Additional Military Leave for Contingency 

Operations 

Federal employees who are members of the Guard and Reserve and 

who are ordered to active military duty for certain contingency 

operations are authorized 22 days of additional military leave 

(effective November 24, 2003). Here are some of the key differences 

between the military leave newly authorized for certain contingency 

operations and the 15 days of military leave, which has been in effect 

for many years. 

1. The members receive the greater of their military pay or 

their Federal civilian pay. They will not receive their full 

civilian pay and their full military pay as they do during the 15 

days of military leave covered by 5 USC 6323(a). The Reservists 

or members of the Guard who have been activated for one of the 

specified contingency operations, such as the one in Iraq, will 

receive the higher of the two salaries, military or Federal civilian, 

for the 22 work days. Of course, they can take annual leave or 

compensatory time instead of military leave and receive both 

their civilian salary and their military pay. 

2. This 22 days of military leave newly authorized for contingency 

operations is available on an annual year basis, not a fiscal year 

basis like the 15 days of military leave covered under 5 USC 

6323(a). Employees became eligible for this military leave on 

November 24, 2003. So, in calendar year 2003, they had 22 days 

of this type of military leave available to them. On January 1, 

2004, they have another 22 days of this type military leave 

(under 5 USC 6323(b)) available for use during the 2004 

calendar year. There is no balance to carry over from one 

calendar year to the next. 

The OPM has updated their Military Leave Facts Sheet 

http://www.opm.gov/oca/leave/html/MILITARY.ASP to include 

a paragraph on the 22 days of military leave newly authorized for 

contingency operations. However, to obtain a clearer understanding of 

the newly authorized leave, you must go to their revised "Frequently 

Asked Questions on Military Leave," 

http://www.opm.gov/oca/LEAVE/HTML/MILQA.asp. See, in 

particular, the answers to questions 1, 3, 4, and 6. 
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has waited until 

employees returned from active military duty to civilian employment to 

settle pay matters related to this general type (under 5 USC 6323(b)) 

of military leave in the past. When different, more current or more 

specific information on this subject is received from DFAS, it will be 

provided.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency 

for International Development to prescribe the manner 

in which programs of the agency are identified overseas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 2744 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USAID Branding 

3 Modernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR BRANDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the United 

6 States Agency for International Development (USAID) is 

7 authorized to prescribe, as appropriate, the use of logos 

8 or other insignia of the USAID Identity, or the use of 

9 additional or substitute markings including the United 

10 States flag, to appropriately identify, including as required 

11 by section 641 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

12 U.S.C. 2401), overseas programs administered by the 

13 Agency. 

14 (b) AUDIT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 

15 the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the 

16 United States Agency for International Development shall 

17 submit to Congress an audit of compliance with relevant 

18 branding and marketing requirements of the Agency by 

19 implementing partners funded by the USAID, including 

20 any requirements prescribed pursuant to the authorization 

21 under subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                             Duquesne Light Company Exhibit 23.1


                         Independent Auditors' Consent

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-52782 and 33-63602, and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement Nos. 33-53563 and 33-53563-01 of Duquesne Light Company on Form S-3 of
our report dated January 26, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Duquesne Light Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1999
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

HEADQUARTERS

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

 

MEMORANDUM FOR DLA Bargaining Unit Employees

SUBJECT: Issuance of Annual Notice of "Weingarten" Representation Rights for Bargaining 

Unit Employees 

The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), 5 U.S. 

§7114(a)(2)(B), provides employees represented by labor organizations the right to request a 

Union representative in conjunction with investigations conducted by Agency representatives 

under certain circumstances. This right is commonly referred to as the “Weingarten” right, based 

on the U.S. Supreme Court decision, NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975). 

Additionally, one of Defense Logistics Agency’s (DLA) many collective bargaining agreements, 

the Master Labor Agreement (MLA) between DLA and AFGE Council 169, requires that 

employees and supervisors be advised in writing at least twice yearly of employees’ right to 

representation at investigative examination(s) and formal discussion(s).

As a bargaining unit employee represented by a labor organization, you have the right to 

request representation by your Union at any investigative examination/interview where you 

reasonably believe the examination may result in a disciplinary action against you. You may 

make this request at any time prior to or during the interview. If requested, the Agency may opt 

to: suspend questioning; grant your request and resume the interview; continue the investigation 

without the interview; or offer you the choice to proceed with the interview without a Union 

representative.

This memorandum fulfills DLA’s obligations under the FSLMRS and the MLA to 

remind employees of their rights and the conditions when those rights may be exercised.

Sources for additional information concerning rights to representation include your local 

Union Officials, the AFGE Council 169 Master Labor Agreement, other applicable local 

collective bargaining agreements and the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) at 

www.flra.gov.

Kelley Gallop

Staff Director

Labor and Employee Relations

 Human Resources
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PAUL M.
ANDERSON                                                          
|Paul M. Anderson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer August 9, 2004
Assistant Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE U.S. Department Washington, DC 20590 of Transportation , . ,,'. ~~~." " 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

JUN 1,0'2010 

.	The Honorable Bobby Jindal 


Governor of Louisiana 


Baton Rouge, LA 70804 


Dear Governor Jindal: 

Thank you for your letter supporting the. application for antitrust immunity filed by American 

Airlines and Japan Airlines. I am responding on behalf ofthe Secretary. 

As you may know, the applicants-members of the oneworld Alliance-areseeking antitrust 

immunity to closely coordinate flights between the United States and Asia. According to the 

application, the alliance partners plan to launch a joint venture for transpacific traffic. 

'The applicationis administered in a public docket, which ensures that interested parties have the 

opportunity to comment. The U:S.Department of Transportation (DOT) will evaluate the 

. application according to rigorous statutory standards, beginning with a review of the record to 

determine if it is substantially complete. Decisions on the application are made in consultation 

with the U.S. Department ofJustice's Antitrust Division following a thorough analysis of 

competitive factors. As this matter is now pending, I hope you understand that I cannot 

comment on the merits ofthe application. I can assure you, however, that DOT will give full 

and fair consideration to the application as well as any comments filed in the docket. 

As isour normal practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2010-0059 as a contact outside the record in this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this proceeding .. 

Sincerely yours, 

Susan L. Kurland 


Assistant Secretary for 


Aviation and International Affairs 

S I 0-\ 00415-0 1 0 
 ....t' 

BOBBY JINDAL 


Governor 


~tatt of 1Loui~iana 

eUict of tbefl9obernor 

AprilS. 2010 

The Honorable Raymond LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation .. 


1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 


Washington, DC 20590 


Attn: Docket DOT-OST- 201~ 

. Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Please support and approve the application for anti-trust immunity filed by American Airlines . 

and Japan Airlines. ApprovaJ of this application by the US Department ofTransportation would 

enable these One-World Alliance ait:lines to work closely together on trans-Pacific flights. . 

This effort is supported by the airports in Louisiana because it will offer Louisiana customers 


more service, scheduIing,8.Qd .pri~ing options. 


SIf:;)y, 

IobJJindal 

Governor 

Post Office Box 94004. Baton Rouge. Louisiana 70804-9004 • (225) 342-7015 • Fax (225) 342-7099 

www.gov.state.la.us
No. 10-7904.

#### In re David W. Creveling, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1055,

178 L. Ed. 2d 877,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 955.

January 24, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit
        32
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of BDC Capital, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission (the *“Report”* ),
        I,
        Richard A. Pomije, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18
        U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 Dated: July
        13,
        2006
 
 /s/
        Richard
        Pomije
 Richard
        A. Pomije
 Chief
        Executive Officer and
 Chief
        Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3585-3586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-050-1020-001]


Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council--Notice of 
Meeting Locations and Times

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council Meeting Locations and Times.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Date is February 26, 1998, from 1:00 p.m.. to approximately 4 
p.m. and will reconvene on February 27, 1998 and meet from 8 a.m. to 
4:40 p.m. The public comment period will begin at 8:30 a.m. on February 
27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The council will meet at the Las Vegas District Office, 4765 
West Vegas Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89108-2135.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phillip L. Guerrero, Las Vegas Field 
Office, Public Affairs Officer, telephone: (702) 647-5046.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), council 
meeting of the Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council 
(RAC) will be held as indicated above. The agenda includes a public 
comment period, and discussion of public land issues.

[[Page 3586]]

    The Resource Advisory Council develops recommendations for BLM 
regarding the preparation, amendment, and implementation of land use 
plans for the public lands and resources within the jurisdiction of the 
council. For the Mojave-Great Basin RAC this jurisdiction is Clark, 
Esmeralda, Lincoln and Nye counties in Nevada. Except for the purposes 
of long-range planning and the establishment of resource management 
priorities, the RAC shall not provide advice on the allocation and 
expenditure of Federal funds, or on personnel issues.
    The RAC may develop recommendation for implementation of ecosystem 
management concepts, principles and programs, and assist the BLM to 
establish landscape goals and objectives.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the council. Public comments should be limited to issues 
for which the RAC may make recommendations within its area of 
jurisdiction. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment, 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need further information 
about the meetings, or need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact 
Phillip L. Guerrero at the Las Vegas District Office, 4765 Vegas Dr., 
Las Vegas, NV 89108, telephone, (702) 647-5000.

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
Phillip L. Guerrero,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1633 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.3 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime DLA When the Nation Calls
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.3 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime DLA When the Nation Calls
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.3 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime DLA When the Nation Calls
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.3 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime DLA When the Nation Calls
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil