alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014421EN.01003702.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — Belron Hungary (United Autoglas)

(Case T-297/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark United Autoglas - Earlier national figurative mark AUTOGLASS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 421/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Christy, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2013 (Case R 206/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch and Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
### Contacts. 

### With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date 

### Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8/31 / 15 Regional Airline Association 8/ 31 / 15 AinTaft Owners & Pilots Association David Oord 8/31 / 15 Airlines for America Robert Ireland 8/31 / 15
You think about your 

teeth a lot more when 

you don’t have any.

Felicita, age 54, Florida

You think about your 

teeth a lot more when 

you don’t have any.

#CDCTips

If you smoke, you could get gum disease that 

can lead to tooth loss. Like Felicita did. 

She had to have 23 teeth removed at once. 

The physical pain has gotten a little better 

over time. Her emotional pain? That’s something 

she still deals with every day. You can quit. 

CALL 1-800-QUIT-NOW.
No. 09-11099.

#### Darryl Simms, Petitioner v. Gerardo Acevedo, Warden.

562 U.S. 1134, 131 S. Ct. 896,

178 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 367.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 774.
Exhibit 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Timothy Harrington, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Able Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


November 14, 2003


/s/ Timothy Harrington
------------------------
Timothy Harrington
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

ORION DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

This is to certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that  the Annual Report of Orion Diversified Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2007:

 

a.              fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

 

b.             that information contained in such periodic report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Orion Diversified Technologies, Inc.

 

/s/ Irwin Pearl

Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 30, 2007

 

/s/ Irwin Pearl

Chief Financial Officer

Date: October 30, 2007
<PAGE>


                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-76697, 33-1805, 33-22289, 33-50248 and 33-74488) and the
registration statements on Form S-3 (Files Nos. 2-96502 and 33-14873 Amendment
No. 1) of our reports, dated August 12, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Quixote Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the years ended
June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Quixote Corporation.








/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 1997
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

SHERMAN TERRILL PRUITT, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0088 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 1995-002635

The Honorable Sherry K. Stephens, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Sherman Terrill Pruitt, Buckeye

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Chief 

Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 11-28-2017
STATE v. PRUITT

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Sherman Terrill Pruitt seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's sixth 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Mathews,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that
        to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: 
        June 27, 2007











/s/
        Robert Mathews





Robert
        Mathews


Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36963-36964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[98-092]


Notice of Agency Reports Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of agency report forms under OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).


[[Page 36964]]


DATES: All comments should be submitted on or before September 8, 1998.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Ms. Darlene Ahalt, 
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: Application for Volunteer Program.
    OMB Number: 2700-0057.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: The application is used to be considered as a 
Goddard Space Flight center Visitor Center Volunteer.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit, Not-for-profit institutions, Farms, Federal Government, State, 
local or Tribal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 50.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 50.
    Hours Per Request: 1.
    Annual Burden Hours: 50.
    Frequency of Report: On occasion.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-18127 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 5\7/8\ percent for the July--September quarter of FY 
98.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
a commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a project (see 
13 CFR 120.801) shall be the greater of 6% over the New York prime rate 
or the limitation established by the constitution or laws of a given 
State. The initial rate for a fixed rate loan shall be the legal rate 
for the term of the loan.
Jane Palsgrove Butler,
Acting Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-17979 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
No. 10-7888.

#### Donald Benjamin, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1190, 131 S. Ct. 1024,

178 L. Ed. 2d 847,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 840.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 942.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2931 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide hospital care, medical services, and nursing home 

care for certain individuals discharged from service in the Armed Forces 

by reason of sexual orientation or gender identity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2019 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Miss RICE

of New York, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. CISNEROS, and Mr. LEVIN of California) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care for certain individuals discharged from service in the Armed Forces by 

reason of sexual orientation or gender identity, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2931 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing the Rights 

3 our Veterans have Earned Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘SERVE 

4 Act of 2019’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION 

6 OF HOSPITAL CARE, MEDICAL SERVICES, AND 

7 NURSING HOME CARE FOR CERTAIN INDIVID8 UALS DISCHARGED FROM SERVICE IN THE 

9 ARMED FORCES BY REASON OF SEXUAL ORI10 ENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1710(a)(2) of title 38, 

12 United States Code, is amended— 

13 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

14 by striking ‘‘any veteran—’’ and inserting ‘‘any indi15 vidual who is—’’; 

16 (2) in each of subparagraphs (A) through (G), 

17 by inserting ‘‘a veteran’’ before ‘‘who’’; 

18 (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

19 the end; 

20 (4) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period 

21 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

22 (5) by adding at the end the following new sub23 paragraph: 

24 ‘‘(H) a former member of the Armed Forces 

25 who was discharged from service therein under con26 ditions other than honorable or with an entry-level 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2931 IH

1 separation by reason of sexual orientation or gender 

2 identity, including by reason of a diagnosis of gender 

3 dysphoria.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact6 ment of this Act and apply— 

7 (1) to hospital care, medical services, and nurs8 ing home care furnished on or after such date; and 

9 (2) to an individual who is discharged from 

10 service in the Armed Forces before, on, or after such 

11 date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-8078.

#### James Eric Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1206, 131 S. Ct. 1059,

178 L. Ed. 2d 876,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 933.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 624 F.3d 875.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Elscint Limited (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rachel Lavine,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: June 30, 2005

                                                By:  /s/ Rachel Lavine
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                Name: Rachel Lavine
                                                Title: President and Director
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)


                                     -103-
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOHN DANIEL CROSBY , Petitioner , v. Case No. 5D 16 - 4 26 2 STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 24, 2017 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. John Daniel Crosby , Lawtey, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, an d Kaylee Tatman , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the Januar y 14, 2016 , judgment s and sentence s in C ase N o s . 2014 - CF
- 2028 , 2015 - CF
- 38, 2015 - CF
- 39, 2015 - CF
- 59, 2015 - CF
- 60, 2015 - CF
- 61, 2015 - CF
- 78, 2015 - CF
- 79, 2015 - CF
- 80, 2015 - CF
- 81, and 2015
- CF
- 82, in the Circuit Court in and for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R . App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).
PETITION GRANTED

. SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., and JACOBUS , B.W., Senior Judge , concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,447,299
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    202,256
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         271,226
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,254,347
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,175,128
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      840,854
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             27,646
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 868,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,500
<PREFERRED>                                    223,282<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,160,348
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   75,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     36,596
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                21,137
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,785,765
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,175,128
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,176,794
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            82,495
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     892,165
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     974,660
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        202,134
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              39,163
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 241,297
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        92,749<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,548<F3>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,036
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  144,512
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       207,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       81,076
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         323,149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $12,674 of Preference Stock
<F2>Includes $12,562 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend Requirements
<F3>Excludes $82,548 extraordinary restructuring charge
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015302EN.01000802.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — A v B

(Case C-184/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters - Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations - Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 - Article 3(c) and (d) - Matter relating to maintenance in respect of minor children concurrent with the parents’ separation proceedings, brought in a Member State other than that in which the children are habitually resident))

(2015/C 302/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Applicant:

Defendant: B

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(c) and (d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations must be understood as meaning that, in the event that a court of a Member State is seized of proceedings involving the separation or dissolution of a marital link between the parents of a minor child and a court of another Member State is seized of proceedings in matters of parental responsibility involving that same child, an application relating to maintenance concerning that child is ancillary only to the proceedings concerning parental responsibility, within the meaning of Article 3(d) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.

1

---