“Entries Required for Shipments to Disposal.

RECORD
FIELD LEGEND POSITION(S ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS
Unit Price 62-68 Unit price of the item

identified in rp 8-22,
Blank 69-76 Leave blank."


Proposed MILSTRIP Change Letter (PMCL) 14,
Unit Price on DI AS3 for Shipments to DRMOs

1. Revise current MILSTRIP, chapter 3, paragraph LL.1.c. as follows:

c. Materiel will be directed/processed to disposal under the
procedures outlined in paragraphs MM. and NN., utilizing the DTID
(using DD Forms 1348-1 or 1348-1A). At the time materiel is physi-
cally shipped/transferred to the DRMO, a shipment status transaction
(DI AS3), with Distribution Code 9 in rp 54, reflecting actual
quantities shipped, the date shipped, and the unit price of the
materiel shipped in rp 62-68 will be furnished to the DRMS per
chapter 4, paragraph H. See appendix C17 for format and required
entries on shipment status transactions furnished to DRMS. Activi-
ties will furnish DI AS3 to DRMS for all shipments of usable property
to DRMOs without regard to dollar value. DRMS will process DI AS3
to the intransit control system when the dollar value is $800 or more
and for all sensitive/pilferable items regardless of dollar value.
The shipment status transaction (DI AS3), meeting the intransit con-
trol criteria, will initiate the suspense file at DRMS which will,
as a minimum, contain the following data:

2. Chapter 4, revise paragraph H.2.b. as follows:

b. For each shipment on a DTID, shipping activities will furnish
shipment status (DI AS3 with Distribution Code 9 in rp 54 and the
unit price of the materiel shipped in rp 62-68) to the DAAS for
transmission to DRMS.

*

+ tO eR OO

*

3. Appendix A1l5, delete the second and third sentences of paragraph b.

that read:

“This method of transmission is limited to 66 characters of data
per line (i.e., rp 1-66), unless the teletype terminal has been
modified to accommodate up to 80 characters per line. If such modi-
fication has taken place, 80 characters per line is acceptable since
DAAS can process the 80 characters per line."

4. Appendix Al5, revise the fourth sentence of paragraph b. to read:

“Submit data required by the MILSTRIP transaction formats shown
under appendix C."

5. Appendix C17, delete the entry and instructions paragraph h.

under the field legend for TCN, GBL, or other shipment unit number
and add the following:

Att 1

*


OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

6301 LITTLE RIVER TURNPIKE, SUITE 210
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5044

DEFENSE LOGISTICS
STANDARD SYSTEMS OFFICE

14 JUN Woo
DLSSO-BM

SUBJECT: Proposed MILSTRIP Change Letter (PMCL) 14, Unit Price on DI AS3
for Shipments to DRMOs

TO: Commander, U.S. Army Materiel Command

ATTN: AMCSM-MSM

Commander, Naval Supply Systems Command
ATTN: SUP 0323

Commander, Air Force Logistics Command
ATTN: AFLC/MMLSC

Commandant of the Marine Corps
ATTN: LPS-4

Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard
ATTN: G-ELM-2

General Services Administration, Federal Supply Service
ATTN: FCI, Room 500

Commander, Field Command, Defense Nuclear Agency
ATTN: = FCLMM

Director, National Security Agency
ATTN: L1111

Director, Defense Logistics Agency
ATIN: DLA-OSC

U.S. Transportation Command, Director of Deployment
ATTN: TCUD-SA

1. References:
a. DoD 4000,25-1-M, MILSTRIP, 1 May 1987,

b. DoD Directive 4000.25, 18 November 1983, subject: Administration of
Defense Logistics Standard Systems.

2. The enclosed proposed change to DoD MILSTRIP (reference l.a) is forwarded
for evaluation under provisions of reference 1.b, which requires a single
coordinated Service/Agency position on all system revision proposals within
the time limit established by the System Administrator. The interface


14 JUN 1988

OLSSO-BM PAGE 2
SUBJECT: Proposed MILSTRIP Change Letter (PMCL) 14, Unit Price on DI AS3 for
Shipments to DRMOs

requirement relating to the proposed change, as envisioned by the system admin-
istrator, has been indicated to assist in Service/Agency internal coordination.
However, omission of an interface requirement does not negate the requirement
for a fully coordinated Service/Agency response,

3. Request the enclosed proposed change be reviewed and Service/Agency
comments/concurrence be forwarded to this office, ATTN: DLSSO-BM, not later
than 60 days from the date of this letter. When nonconcurrence is being pro-
yuced yr a Specific process or the total procedure, include alternate proce-
dure(s).

4, The action officer for this subject is Ms. V. Savage, (202) 274-6062

(AUTOVON 284-6062).

1 Encl PHILIP M. SMITH
DoD MILSTRIP

ec: System Administrator

DASD(L)SD

DLA-Z (DAAS Administrator)
DRMS-OA (C. Jones)

DISTRIBUTION:
DLSSO 10A


DLSSO-BM
SUBJECT: Proposed MILSTRIP Change Letter (PMCL) 14, Unit Price on DI AS3 for
Shipments to DRMOs

1. References:
a. DoD 4000,25-1-M, MILSTRIP, 1 May 1987.

b. DoD Directive 4000.25, 18 November 1983, subject: Administration of
Defense Logistics Standard System.

c. DLSSO-BM letter, 15 January 1988, subject: Approved MILSTRIP Change
Letter (AMCL) 158A, Intransit Control of Shipments to Defense Reutilization
and Marketing Offices (Staffed by PMCL 469).

d. DLA-OSC letter, 11 April 1988, subject: Proposed Change to MILSTRIP,
DoD 4000.25-1-M.

2. Proposed Change Concept/Rationale:

a. Concept: This proposed change refines MILSTRIP on the use of DI Code
AS3 shipment status documents to include the unit price for shipments to
disposal.

b. Rationale: When DoD activities begin submitting the AS3 to DRMS for
all shipments to DRMOs, DRMS will pass through to the intransit control system
only those items that qualify. In order for DRMS to make this decision, the
unit price is necessary, particularly on non-NSN shipments, since the price
data would not be available in the DIDS TIR.

3. Interface/Impact Requirements:

a. Interface: Requires an interface between MILSTRIP, Service/Agency
(S/A) activities, and DRMS.

b. Impact: Narrative changes will be required on all interfacing systems
and to MILSTRIP, reference l.a. A change to S/A systems will be required to
include the unit price on the DI Code AS3 for shipments to DRMOs.

4, Advantages/Disadvantages:

a. Advantages: Will allow DRMS to set up the due-in file for the DRMOs,
while setting up the intransit control system suspense file with only those
AS3 shipment records that qualify for intransit control, thereby precluding
unnecessary followups.

b. Disadvantages: See the impact statement in paragraph 3.b above.

5. Procedures: See attachment 1.

1 Att Encl 1