alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation Policy; Proposed 
Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 98-677 beginning on page 1837 in the issue 
of Monday, January 12, 1998, make the following corrections:
    On page 1837, in the third column, SUMMARY section, second 
paragraph, fifth line, beginning with the words ``transfer of'', the 
number should read ``76,929.3 kilograms.

    Dated: January 16, 1998.
Cherie P. Fitzgerald,
Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of Arms 
Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 98-1827 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(B)

THE FOLLOWING REPORTS ARE COPIES OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
REPORTS AND HAVE NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP.

                        REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Electro Rent Corporation:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Electro
Rent Corporation (a California corporation) and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31,
2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Electro Rent
Corporation and its subsidiaries as of May 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended May 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 6, 2001

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Electro Rent Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the financial statements of Electro Rent Corporation included in
this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated August 6, 2001. Our
audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements, taken as a whole. The schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts
is the responsibility of the Company's management, is presented for the purpose
of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules, and is not
part of the basic financial statements included in this Form 10-K. This schedule
has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic
financial statements, and, in our opinion, fairly states, in all material
respects, the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 6, 2001

                                 Exhibit 23(B)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2957 

To prevent prisoners who have been convicted of terrorism related offenses 

from being eligible for early release, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. BYRNE (for himself and Mr. VAN DREW) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prevent prisoners who have been convicted of terrorism 

related offenses from being eligible for early release, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Leniency for Ter5 rorists Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE EXCEPTION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624(b) of title 18, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2957 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Subject to paragraph (2)’’ 

2 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Subject to 

3 paragraphs (2) and (5)’’ ; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘year’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘year,’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(5) A prisoner may not receive credit toward 

8 service of the prisoner’s sentence for a crime 

9 under— 

10 ‘‘(A) chapter 113b of this title; or 

11 ‘‘(B) section 206 of the International 

12 Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

13 1705) resulting from conspiring with, providing 

14 material support or resources to, supplying 

15 services to, or otherwise aiding a foreign ter16 rorist organization designated under section 

17 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 

18 1965 (8 U.S.C. 1189).’’. 

19 (b) APPLICABILITY.—This Act and the amendments 

20 made by this Act shall apply with respect to each prisoner 

21 in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons on or after the 

22 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Tick Bite: What to Do

Tick bites can make people sick. Below are some steps that you can take 

after a tick bite to reduce your chances of getting sick and how to get 

treatment promptly if you do get sick. 

Remove the tick as soon as possible

1.Use fine-tipped tweezers to grasp the tick as close to the skin as you can.

2.Pull upward with steady, even pressure. Don’t twist or jerk the tick.

3.After removing the tick, clean the bite area and your hands with rubbing alcohol or soap

and water.

4.Dispose of the tick by flushing it down the toilet. If you would like to bring the tick to

your healthcare provider for identification, put it in rubbing alcohol or place it in a sealed

bag/container.

Consider calling your healthcare provider

In general, CDC does not recommend taking antibiotics after tick bites to prevent tickborne 

diseases. However, in certain circumstances, a single dose of doxycycline after a tick bite may 

lower your risk of Lyme disease. Consider talking to your healthcare provider if you live in an 

area where Lyme disease is common.

Watch for symptoms for 30 days

Call your healthcare provider if you get any of the following: 

• Rash

• Fever

• Fatigue

• Headache

• Muscle pain

• Joint swelling and pain

Treatment for tickborne diseases should be based on symptoms, history of exposure to ticks, 

and in some cases, blood test results. Most tickborne diseases can be treated with a short 

course of antibiotics.

CS310465-A November 03, 2021
Common questions after a tick bite

Should I get my tick tested for germs?

Some companies offer to test ticks for specific germs. CDC strongly discourages using 

results from these tests when deciding whether to use antibiotics after a tick bite. 

• Results may not be reliable. Laboratories that test ticks are not required to meet the 

same quality standards as laboratories used by clinics or hospitals for patient care. 

• Positive results can be misleading. Even if a tick contains a germ, it does not mean that 

you have been infected by that germ. 

• Negative results can also be misleading. You might have been bitten unknowingly by a 

different infected tick. 

Can I get sick from a tick that is 

crawling on me but has not yet 

attached?

Ticks must bite you to spread their 

germs. Once they attach to you, 

they will feed on your blood and can 

spread germs. A tick that is crawling 

on you but not attached could not 

have spread germs. However, if you 

have found a tick crawling on you, 

it’s a sign there may be others: do a 

careful tick check.

How long does a tick need to be 

attached before it can spread 

infection?

Depending on the type of tick and 

germ, a tick needs to be attached 

to you for different amounts of time 

(minutes to days) to infect you with 

that germ. 

Your risk for Lyme disease is 

very low if a tick has been attached 

for fewer than 24 hours. Check for 

ticks daily and remove them as soon 

as possible.

WHERE TO CHECK FOR TICKS

www.cdc.gov/ticks/
# C_2016098EN.01000602.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 January 2016 — Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio (SACBO) SpA v European Commission, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA)

(Case C-281/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Trans-European Transport Network - Financial aid - Closure - Decision declaring certain costs to be ineligible and establishing the final account - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Locus standi - Person other than the beneficiary of the aid))

(2016/C 098/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio (SACBO) SpA (represented by: G. Greco, M. Muscardini and G. Carullo, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents, and by D. Gullo, avvocato), Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) (represented by: I. Ramallo, D. Silhol and Z. Szilvássy, acting as Agents, and by A. Lanzi and M. Bozzo, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio (SACBO) SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio (SACBO) SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

1

---
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3094 

AN ACT 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located at 1912 

South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3094 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL PULSE MEMORIAL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Pulse Memorial located at 

3 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida, 32806, is 

4 designated as the ‘‘National Pulse Memorial’’. 

5 (b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memo6 rial designated by this section is not a unit of the National 

7 Park System and the designation of the National Pulse 

8 Memorial shall not require or permit Federal funds to be 

9 expended for any purpose related to that national memo10 rial. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3094 

AN ACT 

To designate the National Pulse Memorial located 

32806, and for other purposes. at 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida,
# C_2015056EN.01000302.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/3

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes — France) — Adiamix v Direction départementale des finances publiques de l’Orne

(Case C-202/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 1(b)(v) - Tax exemption scheme for undertakings taking over a firm in difficulty - Commission decision declaring an aid scheme incompatible with the internal market - Recovery of individual aid granted under an aid scheme - Assessment of the validity of the Commission decision - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’))

(2015/C 056/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Adiamix

Applicant:

Defendant: Direction départementale des finances publiques de l’Orne

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Consideration of the question referred has not shown any factor such as to affect the validity of Commission Decision 2004/343/EC of 16 December 2003 on the aid scheme implemented by France for the takeover of firms in difficulty.

---

(1)  OJ C 202, 30.6.2014.

1

---
# C_2013344EN.01005701.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/57

---

Action brought on 19 August 2013 — Métropole Gestion v OHIM — Metropol (METROPOL)

(Case T-431/13)

2013/C 344/103

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Métropole Gestion (Paris, France) (represented by: M.-A. Roux Steinkühler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd (Moscow, Russia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action admissible and well-founded, and, as a consequence; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action admissible and well-founded, and, as a consequence;

| — | Annul in part the contested decision, in that it refused to declare the invalidity of the Community trade mark at issue based on the marks Nos 02 3 167 081, No 02 3 167 084 and No 794 040, and the other unregistered signs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul in part the contested decision, in that it refused to declare the invalidity of the Community trade mark at issue based on the marks Nos 02 3 167 081, No 02 3 167 084 and No 794 040, and the other unregistered signs;

| — | Uphold the contested decision, in that it declared the invalidity in part of mark No 3 590 981 on the basis of the earlier mark No 02 3 143 685; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the contested decision, in that it declared the invalidity in part of mark No 3 590 981 on the basis of the earlier mark No 02 3 143 685;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘METROPOL’ for the goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36 and 42 — Community trade mark No 3 590 981

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: National word mark ‘METROPOLE’ and national and international figurative marks ‘METROPOLE gestion’ for the services in Class 36

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: The application is rejected in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) and of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
B-P1123rev1 (9/21) ©2021 Magellan Health, Inc.

October is National Depression &

Mental Health Awareness and Screening Month

No one is immune 

to depression

LGBTQ adults: 

2.5x more likely to 

experience depression 

than heterosexual 

individuals

Transgender youth: 

4x more likely to 

experience depression 

than their nontransgender peers

Ethnicity as a percentage 

of the U.S. population:

Women:

9.6%of 

women experience 

depression

Men:

6%of 

men experience 

depression

Depression is a leading cause of disability in the U.S. 

Of the 19.4 million individuals who experience depression, 

34% do not receive treatment.

Two or more races 13.7

American Indian & 

Alaska Native 9.4

White/Caucasian 8.5

Hispanic 6.8

Black/African 

American 6.3

Asian 4.7

If you or someone you know 

is experiencing symptoms of 

depression, call your program 

for helpful resources.

Sources: SAMHSA, CDC.gov, Psychiatry.org, 

SuicidePreventionLifeline.org

Employee Assistance Program

1-866-580-9046 (TTY 711)

MagellanAscend.com
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17120]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[OR-2-0001; FRL-6116-4]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants: Oregon

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the Section 111(d) State Plan 
submitted by Oregon on May 14, 1997. The State Plan was submitted by 
Oregon to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. In the 
Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the 
State's Plan submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and 
anticipates that it will not receive any significant, material, and 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in 
the direct final rule. If no significant, material, and adverse 
comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no further 
activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If the EPA 
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
July 27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Catherine Woo, 
Environmental Protection Specialist, at the EPA Regional Office listed 
below. Copies of the documents relevant to this proposed rule are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the 
following locations. The interested persons wanting to examine these 
documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office at 
least 24 hours before the day of the visit.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 1200 
6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.
The State of Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth 
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Woo, Office of Air Quality 
(OAQ-107), EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-1814.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 8, 1998.
Chuck Findley,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 98-17120 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# C_2013225EN.01008306.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/83

---

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2013 — MasterCard International v OHIM — Nehra (surfpin)

(Case T-13/13) (1)

1

2013/C 225/191

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
No. 10-9712.

#### David S. Frederick, Petitioner v. Alfonso J. Graham.

565 U.S. 810, 132 S. Ct. 83,

181 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6757.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Vote  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2005  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities  as  Chief
Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company, respectively,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 22, 2005             By:  /S/ Bob Martyn
                                   -------------------------
                                   Bob Martyn
                                   President
                                   (principal executive officer)



Dated: August 22, 2005             By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.