alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Aviation LWG offers unique insight to Fleet Readiness Center Southeast

/ Published June 7, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation employees gained insight into the operations of Fleet Readiness Center Southeast during a special all-hands Leadership Working Group forum June 4 at Defense Supply Center Richmond.

Although typically only open to supervisory employees, the officers of the LWG wanted to share with the greater Aviation audience what happens at the industrial support activities they support.

The FRCSE team, located in Jacksonville, Florida, presented “A View from the Customer” and provided a breakdown of FRCSE operations, including recent issues and solutions they’ve worked on. The senior leaders who participated in the presentation were Navy Capt. William A. Palmer, FRCSE commanding officer; Navy Capt. Michael Windom, executive officer; and Navy Cmdr. Curtis Ceaser, supply officer.

To kick off the presentation, Palmer explained the importance of the first slide, which read “We are FRCSE,” drawing attention to the term “we.”

“We ... as in this whole room ... if you’re contributing to our effort, I include you in the ‘we,’” he said. “At Southeast, whether it’s our organic federal employees or contracted support, our partnerships throughout the base, whether you're civilian and never wore a uniform or were one of our shipmates, it takes a village to meet our mission. We can’t do it by ourselves.”

Little more than a decade ago, the FRCSE had more employees than they do now, but they produced fewer products and services at a higher cost, drawing concern from the leaders at the time. They realized the center would be in a death spiral if it continued with no changes. Compounding that, aircraft downtime rates hovered around 50 percent, which was unacceptable to the leadership there.

The FRCSE brought in a consulting firm to guide their improvement process, and since then, they have improved aircraft downtime rates significantly and have shown success throughout the center.

During the presentation, the leadership team from FRCSE shared some of the steps taken to improve their center and answered questions from the audience and virtual participants.

Charlie Lilli, DLA Aviation deputy commander, thanked the group for attending and said it was a valuable introduction to one of Aviation’s primary customers.

“I believe that the readiness centers, our major depots – whether Navy or Air Force – are the heart and soul of service readiness,” he said. “It’s where readiness is actually built, where it’s created and where it’s sustained.”

The team across DLA Aviation is focused on getting the right parts, either by ordering or producing it themselves to get it on the shelves for customers, and Lilli said that every team member at Aviation would go above and beyond for its customers like the FRCSE to make sure they get the items they need.

The LWG intends to have additional presentations for the entire force to help educate the staff on what happens at the customer level.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3078; Amendment #5]


State of Tennessee

    In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to 
extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a 
result of this disaster to July 19, 1998.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is January 20, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 24, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-17713 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 21**Subsidiaries of the Registrant     The Registrant directly or indirectly owns 100 percent of the outstanding voting securities ofthe following subsidiary companies.     **Name of Company** **Jurisdiction**  Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc. Kansas  Calibrated Forms Co., Inc. Kansas  Connolly Tool and Machine Company Delaware  Admore, Inc. Texas   PFC Products, Inc. (1) Delaware  Ennis Acquisitions, Inc. Nevada  Texas EBF, LP Texas  Ennis Sales, LP Texas  Ennis Management, LP Texas  Adams McClure, LP Texas  American Forms I, LP Texas  Northstar Computer Forms, Inc. Minnesota  General Financial Supply, Inc. (2) Iowa  Crabar/GBF, Inc. Delaware  Royal Business Forms, Inc. Texas  Alstyle Apparel, LLC Texas  A&G, Inc. (3) Illinois  Alstyle Ensenada LLC (3) Illinois  Alstyle Hermosilla LLC (3) Illinois  Diaco USA LLC (3) Illinois  Cactex S.A. de C.V. (3) Mexico  Alvest, S.A. de C.V. (3) Mexico  Diaco, International S.A. de C.V. (3) Mexico  Tennessee Business Forms, Inc. Tennessee  TBF Realty, LLC (4) Delaware   (1) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Admore, Inc. (2) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Computer Forms, Inc. (3) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Alstyle Apparel, LLC (4) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Tennessee Business Forms, Inc.
No. 10-7675.

#### Bobby Lurey Reddell, Petitioner v. Michigan.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1051,

178 L. Ed. 2d 871,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1059.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0130

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TOMMY JONATHAN SETH DELLAR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 20, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 13 2023

11/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0130
#### *State, Respondent, v. Ashley, Petitioner,*

No. 91771-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45173-5-II, May 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 908. *Granted*November 5, 2015.
No. 10-7985.

#### Brett Hahn, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1031,

178 L. Ed. 2d 852,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 701.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 381.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Flores, Petitioner,*

No. 92246-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32306-4-III, August 6, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1023. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
**TBS      INTERNATIONAL LIMITED &SUBSIDIARIES                                EXHIBIT      32**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                November 9, 2007  |  /s/                Joseph E.                Royce                                                                                               Joseph                E. Royce President                and Chief Executive Officer  |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                November 9, 2007  |  /s/                Ferdinand V.                Lepere                                                                 Ferdinand                V. Lepere Executive                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                  |
| Date:                November 9, 2007  |  /s/                Frank                Pittella                                                                                   Frank                Pittella Controller,                Chief Accounting Officer  |
# C_2015096EN.01001401.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS v OHIM — Card & Finance Consulting (bonus & more)

(Case T-33/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark bonus & more - Earlier international figurative mark bonus net - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 096/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann, then by A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Card & Finance Consulting GmbH (Nuremberg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2012 (Case R-1890/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS and Card & Finance Consulting GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 November 2012 (Case R 1890/2011-4). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 November 2012 (Case R 1890/2011-4).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Türkiye Garanti Bankasi AS.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        30,403,322
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  14,425,464
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              44,828,786
<CASH>                                       1,466,870
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         788,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,329,026
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             28,131,665
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,767,505
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       329,060
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,689,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,329,026
<PREMIUMS>                                   4,518,957
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,742,837
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             363,170
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   4,803,860
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,370,597
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           959,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (704,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,404)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (700,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (700,325)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              24,362,806
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          5,289,746
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             2,195,110
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             27,457,442
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reportsdated September 10, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the AnnualReport of Quixote Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74488, 333-62933, 333-81955,333-32872, 333-56120, 333-83404, 333-120850 and 333-120852)and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113504, 333-106895 and 333-12345)of Quixote Corporation of our report dated September 10, 2007 relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedule and effective operationof internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Form 10-K.

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, IllinoisSeptember 10, 2007

----
# NYTS2014_FORMATS

||
||
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 981
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 722
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      2175
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          23952
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               17891
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 17670
<LOANS>                                              37920
<ALLOWANCE>                                            784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       84483
<DEPOSITS>                                           53495
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                   1397
<LONG-TERM>                                            300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           29291
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       84483
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                        699
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                      574
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                        82
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                      1355
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                     479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     485
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                  870
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                            0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      62
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                        493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        447
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                             447
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           314
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                           1032
<LOANS-PAST>                                           347
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        535
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       784
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            0
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      784
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                   784
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### *State, Respondent, v. Diemond, Petitioner,*

No. 91772-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71125-3-1, April 20, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1005. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
**DAAN-13-03**

**Master Solicitation without Additional Clauses**

(October 2016)

The Purchase Order clauses are applicable as indicated in the DLA Master Solicitation for EProcurement Automated Simplified Acquisitions (Part 13), Revision *XX*, *(Date)*, which can be found on the Web at http://www.dla.mil/HQ/Acquisition/Offers/eProcurement.aspx.  

(End of Notice)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2012 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 15, 2012By: /s/Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEET OF CLARK/BARDES HOLDINGS, INC.
AS OF AND FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                       347
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,777
<PP&E>                                           7,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,065
<SALES>                                         31,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,147
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,791
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# DSCR fire department participates in Safety Stand Down 2016

/ Published June 29, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
“Safety is everyone’s responsibility,” “Take two for safety,” “Safety is job one,” “Do it safely or don’t do it,” “Our goal is zero injuries,”... there are too many slogans about safety to cover here.  No industry, occupation, profession or group of individuals understands the importance of safety more than the fire service. Yet, every year - it often seems that every day - there is an incident where someone is injured, and sometimes killed because a “culture of safety” fails. We, as the fire service professionals, fail when this happens, so safety has to take the front, right seat, the coveted leadership position. 

This is not a new phenomenon, and because of that leading fire service organizations started a Fire Safety Stand Down a few years ago. Through the years the name for this week has changed; however, the focus and mission has not - safety has to be ingrained in everything we do. This year it is being called “Safety Stand Down 2016.”

Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond’s Fire Department celebrated Safety Stand Down last week, June 19-25. We encouraged everyone to take the opportunity to participate and encourage others to embrace and participate in a “Culture of Safety.” 

The installation’s Fire and Emergency Services was fully involved and has a standing committee focused on safety issues with participation from different organizational levels. The committee put together a comprehensive program for the week covering and delivering this year’s topic and other related topics to our fire and EMS personnel. 

But, this is not a “one and done” event for our organization. We participate in the DLA Richmond Safety office monthly online training and our personnel develop and deliver an in-house safety message each and every week.  We also investigate all incidents, and near misses, within the fire department to determine what can be done to prevent a reoccurrence. 

Safety Stand Down 2016 was an opportunity for fire departments to reengage and support a “culture of safety” and you can do the same.  You can contribute to a “culture of safety” both here at work and home. 

At work you can do a walkthrough of your building to make sure the exit paths are clearly marked and unobstructed. 

You can also have a safety meeting and discuss the up-coming summer season. Some topics to cover include reviewing safe grilling techniques and picnic tips:

·       always place the grill within approximately three feet of clearance from all combustibles;

·       if you use charcoal, dispose of cooled coals in a responsible manner, maybe a metal container; 

·       have a fire extinguisher handy when using a grill; and

·       be careful when leaving cold foods out in the heat, they go bad quickly and may cause food poisoning. 
At home, you can review your escape plan with your family. Remember the term “EDITH” or exit drills in the home”. Make sure everyone knows how to call the local fire department (911) when there is an emergency and review the family meeting place location. To practice your plan, have a home fire drill.