alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 
 WITNESSETH
     Incorporation of Plan
 Grant of Option
 First Date
    
    Number ofExercisable
    
    Shares3,0003,0003,0003,0003,000




---



##### 



Purchase Price
 Exercise Terms
 Option Non-Transferable
 Notice of Exercise of Option
 2




---



##### 



Adjustment in Option
 Termination as a Director
    Competitive Activities
 3




---



##### 



Binding Agreement
  EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.[CORPORATE SEAL]ATTEST
    
    
    
    By:President and Chief Executive OfficerSecretaryDIRECTOR:___
    _
    ________________________________(SEAL)
 4




---



##### 



ANNEX A
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Notice of Exercise
of Stock Option
 
 
 
 
  
 DIRECTOR OR HIS OR HER ADMINISTRATOR,
EXECUTOR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR
QUALIFIED TRANSFEREE 5




---



##### 



ANNEX B
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
Attestation of Share Ownership
 
   Common Stock Certificate(s) No.
    
    
    Number of
    
    
    Number of Shares Subjector Brokerage Account
    
    
    Shares Represented
    
   
    to this Attestation
  o
    
    The maximum number of whole shares necessary to pay the Option Price and specified
taxes, or, if fewer, the total number of listed Shares, with any remaining amount to be
paid by check accompanying the Notice of Exercise.
 o
    
    of the listed Shares with the remaining amount to be paid by check
accompanying the Notice of Exercise.
  NameDate
    
    
    
    SignatureCo-Owners Name (if any)Date
    
    
    
    Co-Owners Signature
 6
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-60-000]

PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Refund 
Report

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1998, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (PG&E GT-NW) tendered for filing a report of refunds made 
for calendar year 1997 in accordance with the Commission's Order of 
September 27, 1996 (76 FERC para. 61,337 (1996)) in Gas Research 
Institute (GRI) Docket No. RP96-267-000 and the Commission's Orders of 
February 22, 1995 (70 FERC para. 61,205 (1995)) and May 3, 1995 (71 
FERC para. 61,131 (1995)) in Gas Research Institute Docket Nos. RP95-
124-000, et al.
    PG&E GT-NW asserts these Orders required it to credit eligible firm 
customers with refunds received from GRI and to file a report with the 
Commission within 15 days of making such refunds. The refund is 
allocated to customers based on each customer's pro-rata contributions 
to PG&E GT-NW's GRI surcharge collections on non-discounted firm 
transportation during 1997, and has been reflected as credits on 
customer invoices issued June 9, 1998.
    PG&E GT-NW further states a copy of this filing has been served 
upon its jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies, and will be posted to all recipients of a share of the 
refund.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 7, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17908 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### *Osborne, Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., Respondent,*

No. 91749-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45828-4-II, April 28, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1018. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-7365.

#### Michael J. Collins, Petitioner v. Washington Department of Labor and Industries, et al.

562 U.S. 1115, 131 S. Ct. 837,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9782.

178 L. Ed. 2d 568,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2005       /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### Exhibit 32.1

### 

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Michael Wilson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ J. Michael Wilson               
|------------------------------------
|J. Michael Wilson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|November 11, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23
----------
               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
               ---------------------------------------------------

         We have issued our report dated May 8, 2003, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Environmental
Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended February
28, 2003 and Part II of this form. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Environmental
Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries of Form S-8 (File No. 333-65469,
effective October 8, 1998), Form S-8 (File No 2-92407, effective August 14,
1984) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-42219, effective September 4, 1991).

Grant Thornton LLP
------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 8, 2003
No. 10-546.

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, et al., Petitioners v. Santa Clara County, California, et al.

562 U.S. 1169, 131 S. Ct. 920,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 182.

178 L. Ed. 2d 804,

January 10, 2011.

Motion of Atlantic Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 50 Cal. 4th 35, 112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 697, 235 P.3d 21.
- Date: 12/9/22
    -       - 2022-12-09T10:55:36-0500
      - JOHNS.DAVID.M.1229146676
PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s)

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Melinda Wharton (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

10:15 Introduction

Epidemiology of COVID-19 in young children

Updates on vaccine effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents

Dr. Matthew Daley (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Katherine Fleming-Dutra (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Ruth Link-Gelles (CDC/NCIRD)

11:45 Break

12:00 Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273): Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in 

children ages 6 months through 5 years of age

Dr. Rituparna Das (Moderna)

12:45 Break

1:00 Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of BNT162b2 in children ages 6 months through 4 

years of age

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in young children: Summary and Work Group interpretation

Dr. Bill Gruber (Pfizer)

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

2:15 Public Comment

2:45 Adjourn

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Melinda Wharton (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

10:15 Introduction

Implementation of pediatric vaccines

Evidence to recommendation Framework: mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in young children 

Clinical Considerations update

Discussion

Dr. Matthew Daley (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Kevin Chatham-Stephens (CDC/NCBDDD)

 Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Elisha Hall (CDC/NCIRD)

 

12:30 VOTE

Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in children ages 6 months - 5 years

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in children ages 6 months - 4 years

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

1:30 Adjourn

CDC

CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

COVID19Coronavirus disease 2019

EtR Evidence to Recommendations Framework

FDA Food and Drug Administration

GRADE

HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration

IHS Indian Health Service

NCHHST

P

NCIRD

NCEZID

NIAID

OIDP Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy

SARSCoV-2Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

WG Work Group

WHO World Health Organization

VaST COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Work Group

VE Vaccine Effectiveness

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/OID]

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Friday, June 17, 2022

10:00 Welcome & Introductions

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

June 17-18, 2022

AGENDA ITEM

Saturday, June 18, 2022

10:00 Welcome & Introductions

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines

Acronyms

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases [of CDC/OID]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Fiscal Years Ended June 30
                                                    1997            1996           1995
                                                -----------     -----------    -----------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>            <C>        
Primary

Net (Loss)/Income from Continuing Operations    $    (4,584)    $     4,232    $     7,236
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding ........      7,997,296       7,775,391      7,616,437

Incremental Shares from Assumed

  Exercise of Stock Options ................             --         113,954        277,744
                                                -----------     -----------    -----------

Total Shares ...............................      7,997,296       7,889,345      7,894,181
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========


Primary Per Share Amounts

Net (Loss)/Income from Continuing Operations          (0.57)           0.53           0.92
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========


Fully Diluted *

Net (Loss)/Income from Continuing Operations         (4,584)          4,232          7,236
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding ........      7,997,296       7,775,391      7,616,437

Incremental Shares from Assumed

  Exercise of Stock Options ................             --         113,954        277,744
                                                -----------     -----------    -----------

Total Shares ...............................      7,997,296       7,889,345      7,894,181
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========
                                                                                 

Fully Diluted Per Share Amounts

Net (Loss)/Income from Continuing Operations    $     (0.57)    $      0.53    $      0.92
                                                ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>


*    Fully diluted earnings per share calculation is presented in accordance
     with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to
     paragraph 14 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because it
     results in dilution of less than 3%.
No. 10-7734.

#### Raymond A. Collins, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1159, 131 S. Ct. 963,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 19.

178 L. Ed. 2d 793,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 94.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00208-CR

IN RE Stephen Wayne RICHARDSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 22, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 8, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CR10629, styled The State of Texas v. Stephen Wayne Richardson, 

pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner 

presiding.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Able Energy Inc. (the "Company"), on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Gregory D. Frost, Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company and Steven M. Vella, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
      each
      hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





*/s/
                Gregory D. Frost*
              *Gregory
                D. Frost*
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*
              *May15,
                2006*
              

              */s/
                Steven M. Vella*
              *Steven
                M. Vella*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
              *May
                15, 2006*








[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Able Energy Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### Charles Foster, Appellant, v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Respondent.

[61 NYS3d 894]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered March 8, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) (45 USC § 51*et*seq.) and the claim for common-law negligence, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to the FELA claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*544Defendant is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the FELA claim. In its capacity as the operator of an interstate railway transit system, defendant may be subject to liability as an interstate “common carrier by railroad” within the meaning of FELA if the alleged negligent act is committed in connection with defendant’s interstate railway commerce operations *(see Zuckerberg v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*75 AD3d 503, 505 [2d Dept 2010]). It cannot be said as a matter of law that the alleged negligent act here — namely, defendant’s decision to continue plaintiff’s employment as a machinist despite plaintiff’s disability — is divorced from defendant’s railway operations. In addition, there is evidence that defendant had significant supervisory control over plaintiff’s employment, because defendant’s doctors evaluated plaintiff’s physical condition and determined the restrictions to be applied to plaintiff’s job duties; such supervisory control may be sufficient to bring plaintiff within the ambit of FELA *(see Smith v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*226 AD2d 168 [1st Dept 1996], *Lv denied*89 NY2d 803 [1996], *cert denied*520 US 1186 [1997]).

As to any statute of limitations argument, we note that defendant did not plead that defense. In any event the last injury plaintiff attributed to defendant’s negligence manifested around June 2005, and the complaint was filed in April 2008, which is within the three-year statute of limitations *(see Anderson v BNSF Ry.,*380 Mont 319, 337, 354 P3d 1248, 1262-1263 [2015], *cert denied*577 US —, 136 S Ct 1493 [2016]).

Because FELA “wholly preempts State-law remedies for railway employees injured in the course of employment” *(Ganci v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.,*258 AD2d 386, 386 [1st Dept 1999], *appeal dismissed*93 NY2d 965 [1999]), and because the standards applied when deciding a FELA claim are similar to those applied in common-law negligence actions, but “are substantially relaxed” *(Hyatt v Metro-North Commuter R.R.,*16 AD3d 218, 218 [1st Dept 2005]), plaintiff’s duplicative common-law negligence claim is not reinstated.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138960 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138960 

 COA: 290642 

St. Joseph CC: 05-013020-FH 

WARREN EDWARD ENGLISH, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2317

G.R., 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; APM 

TERMINALS, INCORPORATED; SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY 

ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, 

 Respondents. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. 

(08-0435)

Submitted: September 9, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Bruce Bennett Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. 

Lawrence P. Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondents APM Terminals, Incorporated, and Signal Mutual 

Indemnity Association, Limited. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

G.R. seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s 

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s 

award of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 

§§ 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the 

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is 

without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

review for the reasons stated by the Board. G.R. v. APM 

Terminals, Inc., No. 08-0435 (B.R.B. Sept. 29, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### *State, Respondent, v. Clark, Petitioner,*

No. 92021-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45103-4-II, June 23, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1028. *Granted*December 2, 2015.
No. 10-5748.

#### Terrence Patrick Sheehan, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 966, 131 S. Ct. 465,

178 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7933,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-7558.

#### Richard Allen Shaneberger, Petitioner v. Kurt Jones, Warden.

562 U.S. 1186, 131 S. Ct. 1013,

178 L. Ed. 2d 841,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 790.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 448.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37351-37356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 98-49]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the

[[Page 37352]]

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 98-49, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification and sensitivity of technology.

    Dated: July 6, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
      

[[Page 37353]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY98.009



[[Page 37354]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY98.010



[[Page 37355]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY98.011



[[Page 37356]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10JY98.012


[FR Doc. 98-18315 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C