alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  Form
10-Q/A  (Mark
One)  | X |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934   For the
quarterly period ended: November 30, 2009   |__|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934   Commission file number: 000-27225   DigitalTown, Inc. (Name of
registrant in its charter)  Minnesota
41-1427445(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)11974 Portland Avenue, Burnsville, Minnesota
55337(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number: (952)
890-2362  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:   Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
X

No  Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
       [  ]  Yes  [  ] No
   [ X] (Not required)      Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer.  See definitions of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.   (check
one):  Large
Accelerated Filer [  ] Accelerated
Filer [  ] Non-Accelerated
Filer [  ] Smaller reporting
company [X]  Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).      [  ]  Yes  [X]
 No  There were 27,403,725
shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of January 11, 2010.  ii      Explanatory Note  The
sole purpose of this amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10Q, filed
January 14, 2010 (the Original Filing), is to correct the typed signatures to
accurately reflect the correct signors of the Report.  No other information
is being amended.       SIGNATURES  In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.  DigitalTown,
Inc.  Dated:
January 14, 2010  /s/
Richard A. Pomije____________ Richard
A. Pomije, CEO  /s/
Paul R. Gramstad____________ Paul
R. Gramstad, CFO
### Exhibit 32.2

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia L. Hedrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ Cynthia L. Hedrick 
|-----------------------
|Cynthia L. Hedrick     
|Chief Financial Officer
|December 9, 2005
2/20/2015 Page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Chemical ID: P-15-0221 Reviewer: Tobias/SD 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

 Surface water 

 Ground water (landfill) 

 Consumer Use: DtD2

Inhalation 

 Air: incineration (stack) 

 Air: fugitive 

 Consumer Use: CEM3

Dermal 

 Consumer Use: CEM 

Eco 

 Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

 Consumer Use: DtD

1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch’s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                                       0001065418
<NAME>                              Key Components LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                       572
<INVENTORY>                                     29,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,344
<PP&E>                                          22,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,357
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,795
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,356
<SALES>                                         35,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,076
<CGS>                                           21,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                       681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLLUTION PREVENTION AND TOXICS 

# 4UG 2 0 2013
Mr. James L. Bero Senior Vice President	1 Environment, Health and Safety BASF Corporation 100 Park Avenue Florham Park, NJ 07932 Re: Suhmitting REACH Studies to Comply with a Test Rule Issued under Section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act

Dear Mr. Bero; This letter is in response to your letter of August 2, 2013, offering to provide EPA with robust summaries and fall study reports to satisfy testing required by a test rule issued under section 4 of the. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 2-Butenedioic acid (2E)-, di-C8-18-alkyl esters (CASRN 68610-90-2). Your letter stated that the studies would "carry a notice of BASF copyright and reservation of data compensation rights for any commercial use" and that BASF "would ask US EPA not to make these study reports available electronically on its websites or otherwise (e.g., at www.regulations.gov)." EPA has considered your request, but cannot promise to withhold the information. Section 14 of TSCA (15 USC 2613), concerning the disclosure of data, provides for the disclosure of health and safety studies required under section 4 of TSCA. While business information submitted under TSCA may be claimed as confidential by a submitter, such claims are treated in accordance with EPA confidentiality regulations pursuant to 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. Permitted claims are limited, and confidentiality is not guaranteed. In particular, 40 CFR 2.215(a) provides that EPA may not enter into an agreement with a business to keep information confidential unless the agreement is consistent with the subpart B regulations. Because EPA has not made a determination under 40 CFR 2.205 ^ that the copyrighted information is entitled to confidential treatment, EPA cannot commit to withholding that information. In addition, it is EPA's policy to make test data publicly available. See http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html. Subject to subpart B procedures, it is EPA's practice to post test data in the publicly-available electronicdocket. Nothing, however, prevents a submitter from marking the study with a copyright

notice, and EPA would not redact the notice when posting the study to the electronic docket.	; Accordingly, BASF may submit the REACH documents to EPA to fulfill the test requirements for 2-Butenedioic acid (2E)-, di-C8-18-alkyl esters (CASRN 68610-90-2), but EPA cannot guarantee that they will be kept confidential or that they will ultimately be deemed to have satisfied the test requirements. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact John Schaeffer of my staff (schaeffer j ohn@epa. gov ;202-564-8173).

Sincerely,

Paul Lewis, Ph.D. 

### Chief Chemical Information and Testing Branch

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112
No. 10-7378.

#### Johnny Allen James, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 939,

178 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 494,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-7625.

#### Robert Bernard Alexander, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 954,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 98.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 274.
# New Cumberland Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation host 5k in support of Domestic Violence Awareness Month

/ Published Oct. 24, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
In support of Domestic Violence Awareness Month, to help raise awareness against domestic violence, the Family Advocacy Program and MWR New Cumberland Fitness Department hosted the Domestic Violence Awareness 5K Fun Run and two-mile walk on October 19. 

A.J. Brandt, DLA Distribution’s sexual assault response coordinator gave opening remarks before the event kicked off. “Victims of violence often suffer in silence, not knowing where to turn, with little or no guidance and support.” 

The 5K event was considered a "fun" run/walk, so times were not tracked for a first, second and third place winner; however, Eric Sweeney, financial systems analyst for DLA Finance finished first with a time of 18 minutes and 36 seconds.

Domestic Violence Awareness Month evolved from the "Day of Unity" in October 1981. The intent was to connect advocates across the nation who were working to end violence against women and their children. The Day of Unity soon became an entire week devoted to a range of activities conducted at the local, state and national levels.

In October 1987, the first Domestic Violence Awareness Month was observed. That same year marks the initiation of the first national domestic violence toll-free hotline, 800-799-7233. In 1989 the U.S. Congress passed Public Law 101-112 designating October of that year as National Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER J. YORK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-739 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 11, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharewell, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
CS 329991-A

Decision-making for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE)

vaccination for U.S. travelers

Healthcare provider should assess a traveler’s risk for TBE virus infection based on their 

planned activities and itinerary:

1. All travelers to TBE-endemic countries with risk of tick exposure should take precautions 

to avoid tick bites1 

2. For some travelers who are at increased risk of TBE, TBE vaccine might be indicated

Moving or traveling to a TBE-endemic area and likely to 

have extensive exposure to ticks2 based on planned outdoor 

activities and itinerary?

Yes

TBE vaccine recommended

No

Further assess:

1. Likely extent of exposure to ticks based on planned activities and itinerary

2. Risk factors for a poorer medical outcome (e.g., older age)

3. Personal perception and tolerance of risk

TBE vaccine may be considered based on these factors

1 Travelers also should be advised to avoid the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products

2 Persons with extensive exposure to ticks are likely to be at highest risk and could include shorter-term (e.g., <1 month) travelers with daily or 

frequent exposure, or longer-term travelers with regular (e.g., a few times a month) exposure, to environments that might harbor infected ticks
Exhibit 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Karen Y. Duran, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB by Falcon Ridge
Development Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Falcon Ridge
Development Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

     4. I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Falcon Ridge
Development Inc. and have:

          i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to Falcon Ridge Development Inc., including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are
     being prepared;

          ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

          iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

     5. I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Falcon Ridge Development Inc. auditors and the audit
committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

          i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for Falcon Ridge Development Inc.'s auditors any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and

          ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
     controls; and

     6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether
or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 21, 2005       /s/ Karen Y. Duran
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Karen Y. Duran, Chief Financial Officer
# Supp Figure 1

# Supp Figure 1

# Supp Figure 2

# Supp Figure 2

# Supp Figure 3

# Supp Figure 3

# Supp Figure 4

# Supp Figure 4
----

Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

                I, Nicholas Pappas, certify that:

                1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Envirokare Tech, Inc.;

                2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

                3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

                4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

                5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14th, 2005

By: /s/ Nicholas Pappas  ________________________  Name:    Nicholas Pappas  Title:     Chairman and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33624]


Mississippi & Tennessee RailNet, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--The Kansas City Southern Railway Company

    Mississippi & Tennessee RailNet, Inc. (MTRN), a noncarrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire 
and operate approximately 87.1 miles of rail line and approximately 
7.53 miles of spur and side tracks from The Kansas City Southern 
Railway Company between milepost 281.5 at Houston, MS, and milepost 
368.6 at Middleton, TN.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ MTRN states that its projected revenues will not exceed 
those that would qualify it as a Class III rail carrier and its 
revenues are not projected to exceed $5 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after 
June 26, 1998.
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 33625, North 
American RailNet, Inc.,--Continuance in Control Exemption--Mississippi 
& Tennessee RailNet, Inc., wherein North American RailNet, Inc. will 
continue in control of MTRN upon its becoming a Class III rail carrier.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33624, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Robert A. Wimbish, Esq., Rea, Cross, & Auchincloss, 1707 L 
Street, NW, Suite 750, Washington, DC 20036.
    Board decisions and notices re available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: July 6, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18569 Filed 7-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-M