alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





                                       /S/ COREY M. HOROWITZ
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                                       May 12, 2008
--.---------------------------------~----------------

Devany, Dennis (OSn 

From: pahjah@frontiernet.net DEPT OF 

Sent:­ ;, MOr:lday, February 15; 2010 9:56 AM 

To:" i, DeVany, Dennis (OST): Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air 

.,' ". . 

Dear Mr. Devan)! and Swanson, ", ~ ...n., '" ';'1!'> .. 

I have flown with Cape Air on a number of occasions - Albany to Massena. The flights were on time. The personell were 

professional in their performance and very personable. It was a pleasure to fly with them. The size of their airplane is not 

an issue. None of the flights I've taken were sold out and there was enough room for people luggage etc. In fact, I wish 

you would expand Cape Air's area of service to include Stewart International Airport in New Windsor, NY., Orange 

County. The ticket price is reasonable and the number of flights provided by Cape A,ir gave greater flexibility. Please 

reconsider your decisIon to move to Colgan. Thank you for your consideration.....John A. Hunter 

1
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-111-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 16, 1997, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 111. East 
Tennessee requests that this revised tariff sheet be deemed effective 
February 15, 1998.
    East Tennessee states that Fourth Revised Sheet No. 111 corrects an 
inadvertent error, namely the mistaken insertion of language previously 
approved for deletion by the Commission. See November 13, 1996 Letter 
Order in Docket No. RP97-31. The language approved for deletion 
involved the restriction in the General Terms and Conditions of East 
Tennessee's FERC Gas Tariff, that a request for service from East 
Tennessee could be made no earlier than 90 days prior to the proposed 
commencement date of service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1878 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert
Mathews, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking Systems,
Inc.







Date:
      November 6, 2009
            /s/ Robert
      MathewsRobert
      MathewsChief
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-010-1430-01; N-56882]


Termination of Segregative Effect, Portion of Airport Lease N-
56882

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action partially terminates a segregative effect on 
airport lease N-56882 held by the Eureka County Board of Commissioners. 
The land will be opened to the operation of the public land laws, 
including location and entry under the mining laws.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 29, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Nelson, Elko Field Office, 
3900 E. Idaho St., Elko, Nevada 89801, 702-753-0200

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The segregative effect for the affected 
lands was made on July 21, 1966, pursuant to the Act of May 24, 1928, 
as amended. Partial termination of the segregative effect will allow 
conveyance by direct sale of the affected land to the Eureka County 
Board of Commissioners in order to alleviate a situation of inadvertent 
encroachment by adjacent property owners.
    The segregative effect is hereby terminated for the following 
described land:

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 29 N., R. 48 E.,
    Sec. 4,. Lots 14, 15, 18.

    The area described contains 5.13 acres in Eureka County.

    1. At 9 a.m. on July 29, 1998, the land described above will be 
opened to the operation of the public land laws generally, subject to 
valid existing rights, the provision of existing withdrawals, other 
segregations of record, and the requirements of applicable law.
    2. At 9 a.m. on July 29, 1998, the land described above will be 
opened to location and entry under the United States mining laws, 
subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of existing 
withdrawals, other segregations of record, and the requirements of 
applicable law. Appropriation of any of the land described in this 
order under the general mining laws prior to the date and time of 
restoration is unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, 
including attempted adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38 (1988), shall 
vest no rights against the United States. Acts required to establish a 
location and to initiate a right of possession are governed by State 
law where not in conflict with Federal law. The Bureau of Land 
Management will not intervene in disputes between rival locators over 
possessory rights since Congress has provided for such determinations 
in local courts.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
David J. Vandenberg,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-17156 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3092 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3092

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Police Home 
Rule Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO ASSUME EMERGENCY CONTROL OF 
              POLICE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Repeal of Authority.--The District of Columbia Home Rule Act is 
amended by striking section 740 (sec. 1-207.40, D.C. Official Code).
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 740.
                                 <all>
```
For more information on E-Verify, 

please contact DHS at: 

1-888-464-4218

Participates in E-Verify This Employer

This employer will provide the Social Security Administration 

(SSA) and, if necessary, the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS), with information from each new 

employee’s Form I-9 to confirm work 

authorization.

IMPORTANT: If the Government cannot 

confirm that you are authorized to work, 

this employer is required to provide you 

written instructions and an opportunity 

to contact SSA and/or DHS before taking 

adverse action against you, including 

terminating your employment. 

Employers may not use E-Verify to pre-screen job applicants or 

to re-verify current employees and may not limit or influence the 

choice of documents presented for use on the Form I-9. 

In order to determine whether Form I-9 documentation is valid, 

this employer uses E-Verify’s photo screening tool to match 

the photograph appearing on some 

permanent resident and employment 

authorization cards with the official U.S. 

Citizenship and Immigration Services’ 

(USCIS) photograph. 

If you believe that your employer has 

violated its responsibilities under this 

program or has discriminated against 

you during the verification process 

based upon your national origin or 

citizenship status, please call the Office of Special Counsel at 

1-800-255-7688 (TDD: 1-800-237-2515).

NOTICE:

Federal law requires 

all employers 

to verify the identity and 

employment eligibility 

of all persons hired to work 

in the United States.
ouY VI c6 THE THOAT KH61 


• 'A. « 

caN GHIEN THUOC 


Trung Tim Cai Thuoc U B~ng Tieng Vi~
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Wang Lei, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sunburst Acquisition VII, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Wang Lei Wang Lei, Chief Financial Officer
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

          This Amendment toEmployment Agreement (the "Amendment") modifies and supplements the EmploymentAgreement dates as of May 10, 2002 (the "Employment Agreement") between RobertB. Terry ("Executive") and Farmland Industries, Inc. (together with allaffiliates, the "Company").

          Notwithstanding anythingcontained in the Employment agreement to the contrary, in the case of early termination ofthe Employment Agreement:

> 
(i)                     because of the death of Executive pursuant to Section 6(a);

> 
(ii)                   by the Company without cause pursuant to Section 6(b)(1);

> 
(iii)                  by the Company because of the disability of Executive pursuant to                         Section    6(b)(3); or

> 
(iv)              by    Executive for "Good Reason" pursuant to Section 6(c)(2),

Executive shall be entitled to a full continuation of all salary, benefits and othercompensation under the Employment Agreement, with no reduction or mitigation of any kind,for the remainder of the two-year employment period in effect at the time of such earlytermination.  Such continuation of salary, benefits and other compensation shall bein addition to any severance or other compensation to which the Executive may be entitledunder the Employment Agreement upon termination, including any and all post-terminationpayments described in Section 7 thereof, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7(c).

          All other provisions of theEmployment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, according to their terms.

          This Amendment shall beeffective only upon approval by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Missouri in the Company's pending bankruptcy case in connection with theapproval of a Key Employee Retention Plan or otherwise.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement this 30th day ofAugust, 2002.

| EXECUTIVE           |  | FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC.               |
|---------------------|--|-----------------------------------------|
|                     |  |                                         |
| /s/ ROBERT B. TERRY |  | By: /s/ HARRY FEHRENBACHER              |
| Robert B. Terry     |  | Harry Fehrenbacher,                     |
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors      |
|                     |  |                                         |
|                     |  | By: /s/ JODY BEZNER                     |
|                     |  | Jody Bezner,                            |
|                     |  | Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors |
DoD 4000.25-2-M, June 2006

Change 5

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2,**November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP3.30. APPENDIX 3.30**

**FOLLOW-UP FOR DELINQUENT MATERIEL RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT**

## 

AP3.30-1

APPENDIX 3.30
No. 10-7450.

#### In re Carlos Shaarbay, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1090, 131 S. Ct. 811,

178 L. Ed. 2d 547,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9496.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Nelson, Petitioner,*

No. 92073-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71852-5-I, July 20, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1059. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
Opinion issued April 30, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00714-CV

———————————

RAMESH KAPUR D/B/A AIC MANAGEMENT, Appellant

V.

ENGELHARDT LAW, PLLC AND STEVEN ENGELHARDT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-56784

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ramesh Kapur, doing business as AIC Management Company,

has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a). After being 

notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal for appellant’s failure to file a 

brief, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 
2

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a 

brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 27, 2019

p1120 

# Order

Clerk November 27, 2019

157134

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157134

COA: 335193

Genesee CC: 11

- 029956

- FC

AARON ANTWAUN ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2018, the application for leave to appeal t he December 28,

2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in

People v Beck (Docket No. 152934) and People v Dixon

- Bey (Docket No. 156746). On

order of the Court, Beck having been decided on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), and

leave to appeal having been denied in Dixon

- Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019),

the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting

leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals a nd we REMAND

this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Beck . In addition, the

Court of Appeals shall analyze: (1) whether defendant’s argument pertaining to the

consecutive nature of his sentences is outside the scope of the reman d for “resentencing”;

and (2) if not, whether the trial court articulated an appropriate basis for imposing

consecutive sentences. See People v Norfleet , 317 Mich App 649 (2016). In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persua ded that the remaining

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Amendment to the Pentair, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE PENTAIR, INC. 
 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS NONQUALIFIED 
 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  

	1.	Background. The Board of Directors of Pentair, Inc. has authorized, effective December 10, 2004, an amendment of the Pentair, Inc. Outside Director’s Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan to allow a director to attest to stock ownership in an amount sufficient for the payment for stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an option. 

  

	2.	Effective December 10, 2004, Section 10b. is amended to add the following new sentence to the end of such section: 

  
 An Optionee need not present Stock certificates when making payment in
Stock, so long as other satisfactory proof of ownership of the Stock is provided (e.g., attestation of ownership of a sufficient number of shares of Stock to pay the exercise price). 
  
 The undersigned, by the authority of the Board of Directors of Pentair, Inc., does hereby execute the foregoing document for
and on behalf of Pentair, Inc. 
  

					
	 	 	 PENTAIR, INC.

			
	 Dated: December 10, 2004
	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Louis L. Ainsworth


			
	 	 	 Its:
	 	 Secretary
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 04, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 04, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0337. KARYN ROBINSON v. OPEN HOUSE ATLANTA REALTY & INVESTMENTS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2023CV390481
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3093]


State of New York

    Saratoga County and the contiguous Counties of Albany, Fulton, 
Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Schenectady, Warren, and Washington 
in the State of New York constitute a disaster area as a result of 
damages caused tornadoes and high winds that occurred on May 31, 1998. 
Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster 
may be filed until the close of business on August 21, 1998 and for 
economic injury until the close of business on March 22, 1999 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Boulevard 
South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 7.000%.
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.500%.
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000%.
    Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit: Available 
Elsewhere. 4.000%.
    Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 7.125%.

For Economic Injury

    Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit 
Available Elsewhere: 4.000%.
    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 309312 for physical 
damage and 990200 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-17707 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P