alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## AIR TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building, ground floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590. 

### RE: Exemption 9890/Docket FAA-2009-0416 October 24th, 2012 

## T 

# 00. Z

fl!Z**;.~;u** ·:;•., D 1: ·L1 q u ' . i ·-**~** j ! { lJ

Air Transport International Limited Liability Company hereby requests a two (2) year extension to Exemption 9890 from 14 C.F.R. 

### § 121.310 (d)(4)on the same basis as original arid subsequent issuance. The Exemption allows ATI to carry passengers without a cockpit control device for each emergency exit light, subject to the conditions and limits o(the**Exemp~iol}..** :...**·:·.~~--** :.).: . . : ..:L . . :**~-:._** ... '1·· ..**~--** ,**.::k~-·--~~.-~--** ... , 

## r**~" ~--**  .. , •. \_ ... _ •· -·· ....... ". !.-;!**-:-~-:_·-** •·**-·r::\~:** : ...**~.** :_._ .....**~.t-~.?·-.::::··:·** _·\ ,.....**~--** The original and. sul)sequent bases fot' isstiani::e' ofthe Exemption remain unchanged: . . , 1. The current three-position cockpit switch design provides added safety by reducing the likelihood of unintended emergency battery discharge. 2., Turning the number 1 emergency electrical control switch to its "off" position activates the

. emergency lighting. Two flight deck personnel have access to this switching operation. 

# 3:.. _Opening, the emergency light control circuit breaker also activates the emergency lighting.

. .. Althoughthe use: of a circuit breaker as an electrical switch contradicts FAA policy, it does

prov,ide a back1,1p-that is readily accessible to at least one flight deck crewmember. 4. The 

## pes series ,aircraft has a well-established flight crew emergency training syllabus. Any**qhang~~** to a cockpit functional aspect affecting emergency procedures could introduce a higher risk dtiring a period requiring quick reaction than the original regulation change sought to reduce. 5. Since the DC8 series aircraft began operations on September 8, 1959, its approximately 50 year operations record has not identified any problems regarding the existing installed emergency light system. :.' . Thank you for your consideration.

# ,t;;IGregory-K:,;r;~~~~.\~**-~:.",>:** :; , ·: ·· : .· Director of**S~fe_t)',** Secur;ity.,**~** . . :.: .. &**Regul~t_ory ~ompMance**  ,.,**greg.troxell@airtr~nsport.cc** Office-501-615-3500 -e:x;t.1504 Cell-407-405-6910 . ·. - , I >' Fax-50 1-603-2059

. J . ····:. .·
:.'



### ,. ..
. '·' '"i

·-·r 

### ..... ,_: /**~t~.n** 

### ·_;

·.-.... . , .**-~.** ·. ,-

!. - 

### ,., .. , '.• ·t- .



### ·one

### cantr~ll**center'~ 2S't)cft~n·fr~'l1**  Road .'Littie R.ock, Arkansas 12202 usA Phone: 501-615-3500 • www.airtransport.cc : . . •. : • : ': t •,,**~** : ,J ; :. 't _; ; :**~** ·' ... ' ' . ; i_''**-~** . . . . I ''.
No. 10-1533.

#### Steven Weste, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 827, 132 S. Ct. 119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5251.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*43Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 507.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0114 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL PRESSEL,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 15 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court October 12 2021

10/12/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0114
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40842 Conference Calendar

RODNEY JAMES DILWORTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FNU VANCE, Officer; S. SIMON, Officer; P. JOHNSON, Officer; T. BOOTHER, Officer; FNU CUNDIFF, Officer; JERRY BALLARD, Officer; ROBERT RHODES, Officer; JOHN DOES, Officers; Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CV-275

-------------------- December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rodney James Dilworth, Texas inmate # 632515, appeals the take-nothing judgment in his civil rights suit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dilworth had at least three “strikes” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) when he filed the instant notice of appeal, and he did not argue that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Dilworth is therefore barredNo. 00-40842 -2- from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, the district court’s order allowing Dilworth to proceed IFP on appeal is RESCINDED as improvidently granted. Dilworth has fifteen days to pay the full $105 filing fee or risk dismissal of his appeal for want of prosecution. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.3.1.2.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.10


            Schedule to Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10-K Annual Report
               of DQE, Inc. for the Year ended December 31, 1996


Non-Competition and Confidentiality Agreements which were substantially
identical to that filed as Exhibit 10.14 were entered into among Duquesne Light
Company and each of the following parties, materially differing as set forth
below:

Party and Date Executed            Material Differences
-----------------------            --------------------

John R. Marshall, June 24, 1999    Consideration includes 52 weeks salary and
                                   health and welfare benefits continuance in
                                   the event of a termination for cause; no
                                   restricted stock.

                                   Restriction on competition covers the states
                                   of Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia,
                                   Maryland, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.

                                   Restriction on competition covers gas in
                                   addition to electricity.

Maureen L. Hogel, April 2, 1997    Consideration includes 100 shares of DQE
                                   restricted stock and $1,000 cash.

Stevan R. Schott, August 9, 1999   Consideration includes severance of
Joseph G. Belechak, August 1, 2000 one week per each year of service, minimum
                                   of 6 months and maximum of 12 months.

                                   Restriction on competition covers the states
                                   of Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia,
                                   Maryland, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.

                                   Restriction on competition covers gas in
                                   addition to electricity.
No. 10-10458.

#### Leighton Binns, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 837, 132 S. Ct. 144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6297.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a) /15D-14(a), As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, W. Thomas Parrington, Chief Executive Officer of Lodgian, Inc. (the
Registrant), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
Registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
Registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated
this 19th day of November, 2004. /s/ W. Thomas Parrington
W. Thomas Parrington, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-02210; NAFTA-02210A]


TRICO Products Corporation, Vanceboro, North Carolina; and TRICO 
Products Division Headquarters Buffalo, New York; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Tital 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 as amended (19 USC 2273) the Department of 
Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance on April 13, 1998, applicable to all workers at 
TRICO Products Corporation, located in Vanceboro, North Carolina. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on May 6, 1998 (63 FR 
25083).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations occurred at TRICO Products 
Division Headquarters, located in Buffalo, New York. The Buffalo, New 
York location is the corporate headquarters and administrative offices 
for the North American production facilities of TRICO Products 
Corporation, including Vanceboro, North Carolina where workers produce 
windshield wipers, including blades, refills and parts.
    The intend of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of TRICO Products Corporation who were adversely affected by 
increased imports from Mexico. Accordingly, the Department is amending 
the certification to cover the workers of TRICO Products Corporation, 
TRICO Products Division Headquarters, Buffalo, New York.
    The amended notice applicable for NAFTA--02210 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of TRICO Products Corporation, Vanceboro, North 
Carolina (NAFTA--02210), and TRICO Products Division Headquarters, 
Buffalo, New York (NAFTA--02210A) who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after February 11, 1997 through 
April 13, 2000 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of July, 1998.
Linda G. Poole,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-18577 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17537]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 753-TA-34]

Extruded Rubber Threat From Malaysia

Determination

    On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
determines, pursuant to section 753(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675b(a)) (the Act), that an industry in the United States is 
not likely to be materially injured by reason of imports of extruded 
rubber thread from Malaysia, provided for in subheading 4007.00.00 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, if the 
countervailing duty order concerning such extruded rubber thread is 
revoked.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission initiated this investigation effective December 15, 
1997, following receipt of a request filed with the Commission by North 
American, Fall River, MA, on June 30, 1995, requesting the continuation 
of the existing countervailing duty order, issued August 25, 1992, 
concerning extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. Notice of the 
scheduling of the Commission's investigation and of a public hearing to 
be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the 
notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal 
Register of December 24, 1997 (62 FR 67406). The hearing was held in 
Washington, DC, on May 5, 1998, and all persons who requested the 
opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on June 25, 1998. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3112 (June 1998), 
entitled ``Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia: Investigation No. 753-
TA-34.''

    Issued: June 26, 1998.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17537 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001065633
<NAME> NETWORK PLUS CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,172
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,629
<PP&E>                                          46,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,459
<BONDS>                                         22,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,700
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,210
<SALES>                                         33,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   911
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,810)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.4

                      IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re:                                              Chapter 11

EAGLE FOOD CENTERS, INC.,                           Case No. 00-01311 (PJW)

                  Debtor.                         Related to Docket No. 636.

                             ORDER AND FINAL DECREE
                             CLOSING CHAPTER 11 CASE

          Upon the motion dated January 7, 2002 (the "Motion"), of the
above-captioned reorganized debtor (the "Reorganized Debtor"), under section
350(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sections 101-1330 (the
"Bankruptcy Code"), and Rule 3022 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
(the "Bankruptcy Rules"), for entry of a final decree and order closing the
Reorganized Debtor's chapter 11 case; and the Court having determined that the
relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the Reorganized
Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor's estate, its creditors and other
parties-in-interest; and it appearing that proper and adequate notice of the
Motion has been given and that no other or


<Page>

further notice is necessary; and upon the record of these chapter 11 cases; and
after due deliberation thereon; and good and sufficient cause appearing
therefor;

          THE COURT FINDS that the chapter 11 case of the Reorganized Debtor has
been fully administered within the meaning of section 350(a) of the Bankruptcy
Code and the Bankruptcy Rules; and therefore.

          IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

          1.   The Motion is GRANTED.

          2.   The chapter 11 case of the Reorganized Debtor is closed.

          3.   The appointment and services of Logan & Company, Inc., as the
"Official Claims Agent" of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court shall be terminated
effective ten (10) days after entry of this Order.  The Official Claims Agent
shall prepare final claims registers for the Office of the Clerk of the
Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Guidelines for the Implementation of 28 U.S.C.
Section 156(c), and will box and transport claims to the Federal Archives or to
such other place as the Office of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court directs
pursuant to the Guidelines.  The services to be rendered by the Official Claims
Agent shall be a charge to the estate of the Reorganized Debtor.


<Page>

          4.   The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this
Order.

Dated: January 28, 2002

                                            /s/ Mary F. Walrath
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        for Honorable Peter J. Walsh
                                            Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
#### *State, Respondent, v. Ejonga, Petitioner,*

No. 92030-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70069-3-I, May 26, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1033. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
No. 10-11198.

#### John B. Felder, Petitioner v. Mark Sevier, Superintendent, Miami Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 872, 132 S. Ct. 227,

181 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6667.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 179

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 10-807.

#### Lester R. Ramer, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 1181, 131 S. Ct. 1033,

178 L. Ed. 2d 830,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 725.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 353.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.50-1 APPENDIX 3.50

AP3.50. APPENDIX 3.50

SPECIAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENT STATUS

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier

Code

1-3 Enter DIC DYK.

Routing Identifier

Code (TO)

4-6 Enter RIC of forecasting activity from record 

positions 67-69 of the incoming request.

Blank 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter stock or part number of substitute, if 

offered, or superseding item when 

requested item is obsolete; otherwise, 

perpetuate stock number from the 

document being replied to.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter UI of item in record positions 8-22.

Quantity 25-29 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Suffix 44 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Supplementary 

Address

45-50 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Multiuse 51-56 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Project Code 57-59 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Coast Designation 60 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Blank 61 Leave blank.

Lead Time 62-64 When specified by the status code in record 

positions 65-66, enter the number of days 

representing procurement lead time and/or 

time required for assembly; otherwise leave 

blank.

Special Program 

Requirement Status

65-66 Enter applicable SPR status code from 

appendix AP2.11.

Routing Identifier

Code (FROM)

67-69 Enter RIC of the ICP preparing this 

response.

Purpose Code 70 Perpetuate from document being replied to.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP3.50-2 APPENDIX 3.50

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Supply Condition

Code

71 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Blank 72 Leave blank.

Day of Year 

(Transaction)

73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on 

which transaction is prepared.

Generic Submission 76 Perpetuate from document being replied to.

Gaining Inventory 

Manager

77-79 Enter GIM on logistic reassignments; 

otherwise leave blank. 

Blank 80 Leave blank.
**AGENDA**

**Supply Process Review Committee (PRC) Meeting 15-1**

**Wednesday, April 29 and Thursday, April 30, 2015**