alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016287EN.01000401.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek v Skatteverket

(Case C-252/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Article 63 TFEU - Taxation of pension funds’ income - Difference in treatment of resident and non-resident pension funds - Resident pension funds subject to lump sum taxation on the basis of a notional yield - Withholding tax applied to dividends received by non-resident pension funds - Whether comparable))

(2016/C 287/05)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteverket

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as:

| — | not precluding national legislation under which the dividends distributed by a resident company are subject to a tax levied at source (a withholding tax) where those dividends are paid to a non-resident pension fund and, where those dividends are paid to a resident pension fund, to a tax calculated as a definitive lump sum and on a notional yield, which, over time, is intended to correspond to the normal taxation of all yields on capital under the general law regime; |
| --- | --- |

—

not precluding national legislation under which the dividends distributed by a resident company are subject to a tax levied at source (a withholding tax) where those dividends are paid to a non-resident pension fund and, where those dividends are paid to a resident pension fund, to a tax calculated as a definitive lump sum and on a notional yield, which, over time, is intended to correspond to the normal taxation of all yields on capital under the general law regime;

| — | nevertheless precluding non-resident pension funds being prevented from taking into account any professional expenses directly linked to the receipt of dividends, where the calculation method for the tax base of resident pension funds allows them to be taken into account, that being a matter for the referring court to determine. |
| --- | --- |

—

nevertheless precluding non-resident pension funds being prevented from taking into account any professional expenses directly linked to the receipt of dividends, where the calculation method for the tax base of resident pension funds allows them to be taken into account, that being a matter for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
No. 10-698.

#### Nicholas Cody Tate, Petitioner v. Georgia.

562 U.S. 1180, 131 S. Ct. 1020,

178 L. Ed. 2d 829,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 907.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 287 Ga. 364, 695 S.E.2d 591.
|   | Exhibit 32 |
|--------|------------|

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sanjeev Kumar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/ Robert C. Stempel               

Robert C. Stempel

Chief Executive Officer

August 29, 2007

 

 

/S/ Sanjeev Kumar                    

Sanjeev Kumar

Chief Financial Officer

August 29, 2007
Exhibit 21
 Bob Evans Farms, Inc. Corporate Structure*
 
 Exhibit 21
Bob Evans Farms, Inc. Corporate Structure*
* Remainder of preferred shares are owned by BEF Ohio (5%, 60 shares) and employees of BEF Ohio and their
family members (10%, 120 shares). owns 100% of Mimis Cafe, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company SWH
Oklahoma, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation SWH Too, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company SWH Liquor Company, a Texas
corporation 75-2811689 owns 100% of owns 100% of Bob Evans Farms, Inc., a Delaware corporation owns 100% of Bob Evans Farms,
Inc., an Ohio corporation owns 100% of Owens Foods, Inc., a Texas corporation Bob Evans Transportation Company, LLC, an Ohio
limited liability company Bob Evans Restaurants of Michigan, LLC a Delaware limited liability company Mimis Café Kansas, Inc., a Kansas
corporation owns 100% of owns 100% of SWH Corporation, a California corporation Mimis Café of Rogers, Inc., an Arkansas non-profit mutual
benefit corporation* owns 100% of SWH Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation owns 100% voting stock of SWH Howard Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation owns
100% of SWH Charles Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation SWH Frederick Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation
owns 100% of owns 100% of Notes:
*The registrant has listed above all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries; the inclusion of any
entity in the table above however does not necessarily signify that it is a significant
subsidiary of the registrant. **Mimis Café of Rogers, Inc. is a non-profit mutual benefit corporation, and as such has not
issued capital stock. It is however supported in part by a subsidiary of the registrant.
No. 10-578.

#### Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2, et al., Petitioners v. Grand River Dam Authority.

562 U.S. 1200, 131 S. Ct. 1045,

178 L. Ed. 2d 864,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1051.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Second Division, denied.

Same case below, 241 P.3d 1132.
Strategic Buffer for Titanium

The Strategic Metal Buffer contract for titanium, SP8000-20-C-0006 was awarded to Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET); on 

28 September 2020 (There are two option years). This material is not Government Furnished Material (GFM) and all 

warranties and title transfer to the vendor from TIMET per TIMET’s sales policy or the vendor’s contract with TIMET.

Material Available

Materials listed below are available to Department of Defense (DoD) manufacturers with valid DoD contracts requiring 

expedited delivery. TIMET has established a buffer stock of Titanium alloy inventories. The listed application is for reference and 

material may be released for other applications. Lead-times for materials must be a minimum of 25% below current Standard 

Quoted Lead times at the time the order is placed. Timet will rotate the buffer inventory by using it for expedited orders under 

government contracts and commercial orders if required.. 

Chemistry Specification Applications

Monthly 

Requirement 

(Pounds)

Ti-5-2.5, Ti5AL-2.5SN, or 

ASTM Grade 6 

AMS 4910; AMS 4926; AMS 4953; AMS 4966; AMS 4967; 

MIL-T-9047; ASME SB 265; UNS R54520; ASME SB 348; 

ASTM B265; ASTM B348; ASTM B381; MIL F-83142; MIL 

T-81556; MIL T-81915; MIL T-9046; MIL T-9047;UNS 

R54520

Fasteners and 

tubes 12,000

Ti-6-4, Ti-6AL4V, or ASTM 

Grade 5 

ASME SB 861; ASME SB-265 Grade 5; ASTM B 

265; AMS 4911; ASTM B 348; AMS 4920; ASTM 

B 381; AMS 4928; ASTM B 861; AMS 4934; 

ASTM F 1472; AMS 4935; EN 3.7164; AMS 

4965; EN 3.7165; AMS 4967; MIL-T-9046; AMS 

6930; MIL-T-9047; AMS 6931; UNS R56400; 

AMS T-9046; Werkstoff 3.7164; AMS T-9047; 

Werkstoff 3.7165; ASME SB 348

Aircraft structural

components, 

engine

components and

valves.

50,000

Terms

Material pricing is per suppliers existing contract(s) with TIMET or at TIMET standard pricing (for those without an existing 

contract). No premium fees shall apply for using the buffer. All material releases are on a TIMET-to-vendor basis. 

Release Procedures

Material is released by a Self-executing process controlled by TIMET, Government approval is not required. All releases must 

meet the following requirement: 

1. A quote or existing order number (e.g., PO, contract) with TIMET

2. Identify Material type, specification and Release Quantity

3. Supporting Government Contract (Buyer’s/requestor’s name, Contract Number, Defense Priorities and Allocation 

Rating). The Contracting Officer may establish additional restrictions on the quantities and type of material released

Reporting

Monthly Inventory and Transaction Reports are provided DLA. The report reflects the beginning and ending quantity by 

material for the month, along with the material releases made during the reporting period.

Contracting Officer Representative: Joie Coppedge, 804-279-3073 joie.coppedge@dla.mil
BENEFIT INFORMATION TO BE TRANSFERRED

When an employee transfers to a position in another Federal Agency, or when the employee’s 

payroll office changes, Flexible Spending Account (FSA), Long Term Care (LTC) Insurance, 

Federal Employee Dental and Vision (FEDVIP) Insurance, and Military deposit information must be 

reviewed to ensure there is no lapse in participation. 

If you have a TSP loan or are making Catch-up Contributions, you must complete the appropriate blocks 

of the TSP-19 form included in your in-processing package. 

If you have a current military deposit being deducted from your pay, YOU ARE REQUIRED to provide a 

CURRENT copy of your LES (Leave and Earnings statement/and copy of total amount paid since you 

started paying from your payroll office). Bring this information with you when you report for duty. 

If you currently participate in a Flexible Spending Account, immediately contact your FSAFEDS benefits 

counselor to update their database with your new payroll ID number*. You may call Monday through 

Friday from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm Eastern time at 1-877-FSAFEDS (372-3337), TTY 1-800-952-0450 or 

visit their website at www.fsafeds.com. 

If you currently participate in the Federal Long Term Care Program, immediately contact your FLTCP 

benefits counselor to update their database with your new payroll ID number*. The toll-free number for 

FLTCP is 1-800-LTC-FEDS (582-3337 opt 3) or visit their website at www.LTCFEDS.com/care. 

If you currently participate in the Federal Employee Dental and Vision Insurance program (FEDVIP), 

immediately contact your FEDVIP benefits counselor to update their database with your new payroll ID 

number*. The toll-free number for FEDVIP is 1-877-888-3337or visit their website at 

www.BENEFEDS.com. 

*DLA agency payroll ID number is: 97380500 

 Aug 2009
October 2, 2015

Mr. Mike Sharp

Space Printing

312 Eureka Avenue

Berryville, AR 72616

Dear Mr. Sharp :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your July 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Space Printing filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2923 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any fu rther, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Div ision

Enclosure s34
No. 10-10679.

#### Jimmy G. Mejia, Petitioner v. Ben Curry, Warden.

565 U.S. 843, 132 S. Ct. 158,

181 L. Ed. 2d 73,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6174.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Nathan, 54 años 

Oglala Sioux

Idaho

CUÉNTALE A LAS 

GENERACIONES 

FUTURAS EL 

DAÑO QUE CAUSA 

EL HUMO DE 

SEGUNDA MANO.

El humo de segunda mano en el trabajo le provocó a Nathan ataques de asma 

graves, y le causó infecciones y daños en los pulmones. Si usted o alguien que 

conoce necesita ayuda gratuita para dejar de fumar, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA. 

#CDCConsejos
# C_2013071EN.01002701.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/27

---

Action brought on 21 January 2013 — Mäurer & Wirtz v OHIM — Sacra (4711 Aqua Mirabilis)

(Case T-25/13)

2013/C 71/41

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mäurer & Wirtz GmbH & Co. KG (Stolberg, Germany) (represented by: T. Schulte-Beckhausen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sacra Srl (Venice, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 November 2012 in Case R 1601/2011-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 November 2012 in Case R 1601/2011-2;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the initial action and of the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the initial action and of the appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘4711 Aqua Mirabilis’ for goods in Class 3 — Community trade mark application No 8 988 181

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sacra Srl

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: word mark ‘Aqua Admirabilis’ for goods in Class 3

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.41-1 APPENDIX 8.41

AP8.41. APPENDIX 8.41

INVENTORY CONTROL POINT/INTEGRATED 

MATERIEL MANAGER FOLLOW-UP

(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC FT6.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

FTR.

Media and Status 7 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Stock Number 8-22 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Quantity 25-29 Enter quantity from DIC FTA or DIC FTR 

or lesser quantity due to cancellation.

Document Number 30-43 Enter data as contained in DICFTA or DIC 

FTR.

Suffix 44 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Supplementary Address 45-50 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Signal 51 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Fund 52-53 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Routing Identifier Code 54-56 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Project 57-59 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Priority 60-61 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.41-2 APPENDIX 8.41

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Action Date 62-64 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.

Status 65-66 Enter appropriate status code from 

Appendix AP2.16.

Other Fields 67-80 Enter data as contained in DIC FTA or 

DIC FTR.
# C_2016016EN.01001202.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Münster — Germany) — Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

(Case C-505/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU - State aid - Aid granted in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU - Decision of a Member State court establishing the validity of the contract granting that aid - Res judicata - Interpretation in conformity with EU law - Principle of effectiveness))

(2016/C 016/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Münster

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law precludes, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, the application of a rule of national law enshrining the principle of res judicata from preventing a national court which has held that contracts forming the subject-matter of the dispute before it constitute State aid, within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, implemented in breach of the third sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU, from drawing all the consequences of that breach because of a national judicial decision which has become definitive, which court, without examining whether those contracts constitute State aid, has held that the contracts remain in force.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
No. 10-8190.

#### In re Prince Eshan, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1060,

178 L. Ed. 2d 876,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1066.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2196** 

DEMETRA MILLADGE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00194

- CMH

- JFA )

Submitted : June 30, 2015 Decided: July 22, 2015

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Teresa Burke Wright, Meredith F. Bergeson, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Demetra Milladge appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of OTO Development, LLC, in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the parties ’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Milladge v. OTO Development, LLC , No. 1:14

- cv - 00194

- CMH

JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with or al argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materia ls before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM E D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,082
<SECURITIES>                                     2,515
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,067
<PP&E>                                          15,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,955
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,041
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (200)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,037)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)


</TABLE>