alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18194]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Extension of Public Comment Period on a Permit Application and an 
Environmental Assessment for Issuance of Permits to Allow Incidental 
Take of Endangered Species for Obyan Beach Resort Associates, Saipan, 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the Commonwealth of 
the Northern Mariana Islands Department of Lands and Natural Resources

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the extension of the public comment 
period on the above named permit application and Environmental 
Assessment for the proposed incidental take of listed species pursuant 
to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. In response to 
requests for a time extension, the original public comment period that 
closed June 23, 1998 (63 FR 31226), is reopened until July 24, 1998, to 
allow adequate time for review and response by the public.

DATES: Written comments on the permit application, Habitat Conservation 
Plan, Environmental Assessment, Implementation Agreement, and the 
Saipan Upland Mitigation Bank Agreement should be received on or before 
July 24, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Mr. Brooks Harper, Field 
Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 50088, Honolulu, Hawaii 
96850. Comments also may be sent by facsimile to telephone (808) 541-
3470.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brooks Harper or Ms. Gina Shultz, 
Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, telephone (808) 541-3441.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided pursuant to section 
10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and National 
Environmental Policy Act regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). All comments 
received will become part of the public record and may be released.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Thomas Dwyer,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 98-18194 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Amendment No. 1 to Amended & Restated Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 4.3 

 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 December 6, 2005 
  
 The Amended and Restated
LightPath Technologies, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 3(e) of the Plan is hereby amended by inserted the following at the end of such section: 
  
 “To the extent the Board considers it desirable to comply with Rule
16b-3 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or to meet the performance-based exception from the deductibility limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall consist of two or more directors of the Company, all of whom
qualify as “outside directors’ within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3.” 
  
 2. Section 3(ee) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and, in lieu thereof, there is substituted the following: 
  
 “Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an
unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of granting of an Award, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of
all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.” 
  
 3. Section 6 of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the following after the first sentence of such section: 
  
 “Any or all of such shares authorized for issuance under the Plan may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options. During any calendar year no
Participant may be granted Awards (other than Awards that cannot be satisfied in Common Stock) with respect to more than 500,000 shares of Common Stock.” 
  

This Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated LightPath Technologies, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of LightPath
Technologies, Inc. in accordance with Section 17(a) of the Plan on and effective as of December 6, 2004.
No. 10-7644.

#### Mario Esparza-Cruz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 955,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 348.

178 L. Ed. 2d 788,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 597.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Wayne Deloatch, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1684 C.D. 2018

:

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (City of Philadelphia), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, February 14, 2020

, upon consideration of Respondent ’s

application for re argument

, and Petitioner’s answer in response thereto, the

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
No. 11-5886.

#### Horace Linton Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 90,

181 L. Ed. 2d 20,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6981.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeMediaQuiz

# Quizzes

## Test your knowledge of the Defense Logistics Agency

Current DLA Troop Support Efforts5 questions

1

1

Return to the main Quiz page...

                      - Contact Us
                      - Site Index
                      - Strategic Plan
                      - DLA IG Hotline
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - DLA Careers
                      - Images
                      - Webmaster
                      - EEO
                      - Section 508
                      - Public Affairs
                      - SAPR
                      - External Links Disclaimer
                      - DOD Information Quality Guidelines
                      - Privacy/Security
                      - USA.gov
                      - DOD Web Policy
                      - DOD Open Government
                      - Plain Language

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inet Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: July  21, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey  A. Kupp                        |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Jeffrey A.  Kupp                            |
|                 |   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 10-518.

#### Andrea L. Holman, Personal Representative of the Estate of Linda Clippert, Deceased, Petitioner v. Mark Rasak.

562 U.S. 1136, 131 S. Ct. 913,

178 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 173.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 486 Mich. 429, 785 N.W.2d 98.
### Do c ke t No: F AA-2015-1998 Dir ec to r a te ID : 2 014- S W- 035 - AD Originating Offi ce Track ing No.: 

### Di s p os ition C omm e nts
Next S t e p : 

# g{"RA N 0 SN P RM 0 Th ese comments are in respon se to an SNPRM 

# ZNo Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received 

## -If thi s box is checked, no signatur es are req uired. 

# Yc{9 Has the referenced serv ice information been rev i sed since the NPRM was issued ? 

### I f yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. No te that changes beyond the scope ofthe previouslypubli shed NPRM will require a new notice. Contact/he Dir ectorate focal point for g uidance. 

### I utc-..1 Rc\ i-..tnn. Instructions: Summarize all comments b y i ss u e (not by commenter) and provid e your recommended resolution of each issue. All co mm e n ts r e la tin g t o th e sa m e iss ue s ho uld b e di sc u ssed togeth e r . Do not li s t all of the is sues from one commenter together. I f changes to the AD are required based on the comments received , explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Refe r ence FAA-IR-M-8040.1 C Chapte r 9. 

### IS SUE 1 : Selec t one of the following: ( IHl\ISl' ntlL'. 

### {f

o ther , explain: Comme nte r (s): 

### ('lid,

**h~r~** I<) 

### ctth:r lL''d . What change to the 

### AD action i s requested? 

### ('lid.

**h~t"-.'** 

### In

**cnt~r** 

### text. Why i s the c hange requested or how is it justified?

**Cli~.:k hct~..**  

### to

**~ntcr** il'\1. Do we agree? Y l'!-. · 1 t ) If YE S , we agree because In"I..'JI 

### ju-..ti lication Make the following changes to the AD: List

**an~** change:-. tu the : \D 

### l f PARTIA LLY AGRE E , we agree with 

### ln .... crt lC'\1 because

**[ns~.:tl** 

### ju:-.tilication We d isagree with

**ln s~.?rl**  lc'\1 because
**Jn,ntju~tilil:atillll** Make the fo l lowing changes to the AD: 

### Li-..t an)

**~..** .. tn);l''- Ill 

### the .\D If 

### NO , we do n ' t agr ee b ecau se ln'>crl out 

### rat i onale I SSUE 2 : Select one of the following: Chol)SL' 

### on('. {[other, explain: Clid, lll'l'l' Ill cnh.:r ll''\1. Commenter(s): ( 

### ltd. here 

### to enter text. What change to the AD actio n i s requested? 

### ( ' lick here 

### to llll\.'r 

### tc:-..t. Why is t he change requested or h ow is it j ustified? 

### l'lick hl·t-c 

### to enter lc\1. Do we agree? Yc-; i\o 

### Page 

### 1 of3I f 

### YES, we agree because

**ln'>~rt ju~ti**  I 

### ic<llion Make th e followin g c han ges to the AD: 

### List am
.... **han~c" 1~1**  

### the \I) If 

### PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree with [JbL'rl lc\t 

### because **lnscrtjustili~.:ation** 

### We disa gree with ln:--crl k\1 

### becau se

**lns~rt** 

### just i 

### lic.uton Make the foll ow ing changes to the AD: 

### l.i,t an) changes to the , \I) If NO , 

### we don't agr ee becau se Insert out 

### ratinn.tk For additional i ss ues, double-click here



### Page 2 

### of3

### Signature Section 

### Signature indicates concurrence with thi s action. Originating Office Trac kin g No.: 

## ASE Printed Name: 

### Date Branch Manager Date



### P

age 3 of3
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
COMPANY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  STATE OF INCORPORATION
Eastern American Energy Corporation. .  West Virginia
Eastern Marketing Corporation. . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Pipeline Corporation . . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Systems Corporation. . . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Capital Corporation. . . . . .  West Virginia
Eastern Exploration Corporation. . . .  West Virginia
Mountaineer Gas Company. . . . . . . .  West Virginia
Mountaineer Gas Services . . . . . . .  West Virginia
Westech Energy Corporation . . . . . .  Colorado
Westech Energy New Zealand Limited . .  New Zealand
Westside Acquisition Corporation . . .  Colorado
Allegheny & Western Energy Corporation  West Virginia
Natural Gas Transportation Company . .  West Virginia
Mapcom Systems, Inc. . . . . . . . . .  Virginia
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
1.

 
number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is 20,000,000 without par value.     (b) The Preferred Stock may be divided into such number ofseries as the Board of Directors may determine. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine and alter the rights, preferences,privileges and restrictions granted to and imposed upon the PreferredStock or any series thereof with respect to any wholly unissued classor series of Preferred Stock, and to fix the number of shares of anyseries of Preferred Stock and the designation of any such series ofPreferred Stock. The Board of Directors, within the limits andrestrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors originally fixing the number ofshares constituting any series, may increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares ofsuch series then outstanding) the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series.     (c) Upon the amendment effected by these Restated Articles ofIncorporation, each outstanding share of Common Stock is convertedinto one share of Common Stock without par value.IV     The corporation elects to be governed by all of the provisions of the General Corporation Law(as added to the California Corporations Code effective January 1, 1977, and as subsequentlyamended) not otherwise applicable to this corporation under Chapter 23 of said General CorporationsLaw.     3. The foregoing amendment and restatement of Articles ofIncorporation has been duly approved by the Board of Directors.     4. The foregoing amendment and restatement of Articles ofIncorporation has been duly approved by the required vote of shareholdersin accordance with Section 902 of the Corporations Code. The totalnumber of outstanding shares of the corporation is 7,707,767. Thenumber of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceededthe vote required. The percentage vote required was more than 50%.       /s/ William Weitzman     WILLIAM WEITZMAN, President         /s/ Harold Easton     HAROLD EASTON, Assistant Secretary  
2.

 
     The undersigned declare under penalty of perjury that the matters set forth in the foregoingcertificate are true of their own knowledge. Executed at Los Angeles, California on September 25,1984.       /s/ William Weitzman     WILLIAM WEITZMAN         /s/ Harold Easton     HAROLD EASTON  
3.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36890-36891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1982]


Northern States Power Company; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

July 1, 1998.
    On June 24, 1996, Northern States Power Company, licensee for the 
Holcombe Project No. 1982, filed an application for a new or subsequent 
license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's 
regulations thereunder. Project No. 1982 is located on the Chippewa 
River in Chippewa and Rusk Counties, Wisconsin.

[[Page 36891]]

    The license for Project No. 1982 was issued for a period ending 
June 30, 1998. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in Section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of Section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on Section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an applicaiton for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 1982 is issued to 
Northern States Power Company for a period effective July 1, 1998, 
through June 30, 1999, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If 
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on 
or before June 30, 1999, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Northern States Power Company is authorized to 
continue operation of the Holcombe Project No. 1982 until such time as 
the Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17991 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-1479.

#### Dennis Crosby, et al., Petitioners v. City of Gastonia, North Carolina.

565 U.S. 823, 132 S. Ct. 112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5623.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 634.
No. 10-597.

#### Daisy M. LaCour, Petitioner v. Annie Kilcrease, et al.

562 U.S. 1110, 131 S. Ct. 836,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9796.

178 L. Ed. 2d 559,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 422.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Perales, Petitioner,*

No. 91664-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31408-1-III, April 2, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1041. *Denied*September 30, 2015.