alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
financial statements for the year ended January 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         450,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  830,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,000
<INVENTORY>                                    293,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,561,112
<PP&E>                                       1,537,724
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,065,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,306,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,095,525
<BONDS>                                        393,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          231,929
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     586,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,306,854
<SALES>                                      5,992,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,992,174
<CGS>                                        4,495,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,304,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,470
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (475,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   525,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,000,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,000,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
        

</TABLE>
PAGE  

8

****
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30421

 

KERRY VILLARD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of

UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2353)

- - - - - - - - - -

March 8, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges

Per Curiam:*

In this contest for lien priority between (1) PlaintiffAppellant Kerry Villard, as a judgment creditor against WhitehallWindermere Company, Inc., the alter ego of Ms. Villard’s exhusband, Joseph Villard, Jr., and (2) the Internal Revenue Service

(IRS), as federal tax lien holder against “White-Hall Windermere,

Company, Inc.” [sic], for federal taxes owed by Mr. Villard, Ms.

Villard asserts that the government’s mis-hyphenation of the
2

corporation’s name produced an error in the index to the applicable
 

1 See 28 C.F.R. § 301.6323(f)-1(d)(2).

 

2 26 U.S.C. § 6323(f)(4); 26 C.F.R. § 301.6323(f).

3

public records of Rapides Parish, Louisiana, identifying the tax

lien debtor as “White-Hall Windermere, Company, Inc., Nominee of

Joseph Villard, Jr.” rather than Whitehall-Windermere Company, Inc.

This, she urges, caused the failure of the IRS to meet its own test

for determining whether a prior recorded federal tax lien primes a

subsequently recorded judgment lien. Specifically, Ms. Villard

insists that the name differences and the resulting mis-indexing of

the tax lien does not satisfy 26 U.S.C. § 6323(f)(4), which

requires the IRS to file a Form 6681 in the office designated under

state law for the filing of liens “in such a manner that a

reasonable inspection of the index would reveal the existence of

the lien.”2 The IRS, of course, insists that the misplaced hyphen

produced an indexing discrepancy that was not so extreme as to

evade a reasonable inspection. 

We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the district court

(which agrees with the position of the IRS), have familiarized

ourselves with the operable facts of this case (which are

essentially undisputed) and have studied the arguments and

applicable law as advanced by able counsel for the parties in their

respective appellate briefs and in their oral arguments to this

court. As a result, we conclude that the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of the IRS and adverse to Ms. Villard is

correct, essentially for the reasons set forth in the court’s
 

1 We do not address Villard’s alternative argument grounded

in retroactivity of the judgment against the tax debtor’s alter

ego corporation as we find it to be unmeritorious under the

established jurisprudence of the Supreme Court and this court.

4

opinion. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is, in all

respects, 

AFFIRMED.1
No. 10-1178.

#### Kenneth Michael Myers, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 815, 132 S. Ct. 92,

181 L. Ed. 2d 22,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6868.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 69.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Reid, Petitioner,*

No. 91936-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31896-6-III, February 12, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1054. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3054 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to modify the reductions 

in Medicaid DSH allotments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2019 

Mr. OLSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to modify 

the reductions in Medicaid DSH allotments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DSH Cuts Delay Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF REDUCTIONS IN MEDICAID DSH 

7 ALLOTMENTS. 

8 Section 1923(f)(7)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1396r–4(f)(7)(A)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3054 IH

1 (1) in clause (i), in the matter preceding sub2 clause (I), by striking ‘‘2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and all 

5 that follows through the period and inserting ‘‘equal 

6 to $8,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 

7 through 2025.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
- Form S-8
    
    No. 33-34149
    
    401(k) Retirement Plan- Form S-8
    
    No. 33-53166
    
    First Amended and Restated 1992
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (formerly
known as the Bob Evans Farms, Inc.
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan)- Form S-8
    
    No. 33-69022
    
    First Amended and Restated 1993 Long Term
Incentive Plan for Managers (formerly known
as the Bob Evans Farms, Inc. Long Term
Incentive Plan for Managers)- Form S-8
    
    No. 33-55269
    
    First Amended and Restated 1994 Long Term
Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Bob
Evans Farms, Inc. 1994 Long Term Incentive
Plan)- Form S-8
    
    No. 333-74829
    
    First Amended and Restated 1998 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (formerly known
as the Bob Evans Farms, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan)- Form S-8
    
    No. 333-106016
    
    401(k) Retirement Plan- Form S-8
    
    No. 333-141139
    
    2006 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDERFrederick H. SchneiderChief Financial Officer
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: MAY 2, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0719 

LINCOLN PARK AVIATION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2011EA250037 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

- . \_.,.; 

On March 14, 2014, a Corrected Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. 

Among other things, this Order set the Hearing in this proceeding for November 4-5, 2014, in 

Central Islip, New York. 

On May 1, 2014, the Respondent filed a one-page letter stating that the "parties have 

agreed that this matter has been resolved by way of settlement." The Respondent further states 

that "I wish to withdraw my request for a hearing." 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, statutory authority, and being fully 

advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Hearing set for November 4-5, 2014, in Central Islip, New York is cancelled. 

2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for 

Hearing, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
--------------------.......... . 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Zachery M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAJ(: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Frank R. Galella, III 

Respondent's Representative 

Lincoln Park Aviation, Respondent 

425 Beaverbrook Road 

Lincoln Park, NJ 07035 

TEL: 973-633-0450 

FAJ(: 973-872-6256 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0719 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 

20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 10-10521.

#### Craigory Lamont Wyatt, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 839, 132 S. Ct. 149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 66,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6052.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 254.
No. 10-1547.

#### Tyrone Duff, et ux., Petitioners v. Richard W. Lewis.

565 U.S. 827, 132 S. Ct. 120,

181 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5360,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 640.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Gyau, Petitioner,*

No. 92096-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71013-3-I, July 20, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1056. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S.
Steven Singh, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 11, 2008



By

/s/ S. Steven SinghS. Steven SinghChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**CH 2**

**DoD 4000.25-1-M**

*DoD 4000.25-1-M, March 2007*

*DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019*

*Change 13*

**AP8.41. APPENDIX 8.41**

**INVENTORY CONTROL POINT/INTEGRATED MATERIEL MANAGER FOLLOW-UP(MATERIEL RETURNS PROGRAM)**

AP3.41-2

2

APPENDIX 3.41.

AP8.41-1

APPENDIX 8.41
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17999]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-262-000]


Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation v. CNG Transmission Corporation; 
Notice of Complaint

July 1, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, pursuant to Rule 206 of the 
Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Commission, 18 CFR 385.206, 
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation (COGC) tendered for filing a complaint 
respectfully requesting that the Commission: (1) expeditiously issue an 
injunctive order barring CNG Transmission Corporation (CNGT) from 
forcing producers or shippers/pool operators to purchase low flow 
meters to avoid having their service terminated on July 1, 1998; (2) 
issue an order clarifying that CNGT's FERC Gas tariff does not provide 
CNGT with the authority to unilaterally terminate service unless a 
producer or shipper/pool operator agrees to purchase low flow meters 
from CNGT; and (3) issue an order requiring CNGT to repurchase any low 
flow meters that it forced parties to purchase in violation of its FERC 
Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said complaint should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.214, 385.211. All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before July 15, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. Answers to this complaint shall be 
due on or before July 15, 1998.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17999 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-8367 (10A698).

#### Leroy White, Petitioner v. Grantt Culliver, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1174, 131 S. Ct. 992,

178 L. Ed. 2d 820,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 611.

January 13, 2011.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied. The order heretofore entered by Justice Thomas is vacated.

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 292.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J AN 19, 2010 J OHN L EY ACTI NG CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 13 68 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 0 8- 02 16 5- CV-BE-M KATHY A MOS, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,

ve rs us HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J an ua ry 19 , 20 10 ) Befo re BARKETT, HULL andCOX, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: On Octo be r 14 , 20 08 , Kath y Am os fil ed th is la wsu it ag ai ns t Hart fo rd Life an d Acci de nt In su ran ce Co m

pa ny (“ Hart fo rd ”) in Alab am a st at e co ur t. The si ng le -co un tc o m

pl ai nt al le ge d th at Hart fo rd br each ed a gr ou p di sa bi li ty in su ran ce po li cy (“ t h e Po li cy ”) by “ wro ng ly te r m in at [in g]” Am os ’s be ne fit s un de r th e Po li cy . (Rec or d Exc erp ts 1- 1.) Hart fo rd rem ov ed th e cas e to th e Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of Alab am a be c a u s e A mo s’s cl ai m ari se s un de r th e Em pl oyee Ret ire m en t In co m e Sec ur it y Act o f 19 74 (ERISA), 2 9 U.S.C. § 10 01 , et s eq . On Hart fo rd ’s m o t i o n, th e di st ric t co ur t di sm is se d Am os ’s co m pl ai nt wit h pr e ju d i c e , f in di ng th at he r cl ai m was ba rred by a co nt ract ua l li m it at io n of act io n pr ov is io n i n t he Po li cy . In t he same o rd er, th e di st ric t co ur t d en ie d Am os ’s m ot io n fo r rem an d to th e pl an ad m in is tra to r so th at Hart fo rd co ul d co ns id er m ed ic al reco rd s th at it ha d no t co ns id ered pr ev io us ly, fin di ng th at rem an d was in ap pr op ria te be cau se th e li m it at io ns pe rio d ha d ex pi red

. Am os ap pe al s th e di sm is sa l an d de ni al of rem an d. Afte r rev ie w of th e br ie fs an d rec o r d , we affi rm . The di st ric t co ur t pr op erl y he ld th at th e th ree- y ear li m it at io ns pe rio d in th e Po li cy is en fo rcea bl e an d, ev en if it

was to ll edwhi le ad m in is tra ti ve rem ed ie s wer e p ur su ed , Am os ’s su it was fi le d a fte r th e li m it at io ns pe rio d ex pi red

. And , we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co ur t th at rem an d fo r fu rth er co ns id erat io n by th e pl an ad m in is tra to r is no t ap pr op ria te un de r th es e ci rcu m st an ces . AFFIR MED.

2
No. 10-9911.

#### Lawrence Landrum, Petitioner v. Betty Mitchell, Warden.

565 U.S. 830, 132 S. Ct. 127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5833.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 625 F.3d 905.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 4, 2019

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 18-2932

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

,

v

.

STEVEN A. ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Central District of Illinois.

No. 4:17-CR-40062

James E. Shadid

, J udge

.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION , filed on August 20, 2019, by counsel for the plaintiff-appellee United States of America,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED . On page sixteen, the first full paragraph is CORRECTED to read: “Following this surviving portion of Raupp , as applied to inchoate controlled substance offens es, we find no error in the district court’s use of a base offense level of 20 under § 2K2.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.”
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.18-1 APPENDIX 8.18

AP8.18. APPENDIX 8.18

DISPOSAL RELEASE ORDER DENIAL

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Document Identifier Code 1-3 Enter DIC A6J.

Routing Identifier Code 4-6 RIC or the source of supply from which 

the disposal release order (DRO) was 

received.

Media and Status 7 Leave blank.

Stock or Part Number 8-22 Enter the stock or part number of the item 

denied.

Unit of Issue 23-24 Enter U/I.

Quantity 25-29 a. Enter quantity denied; for example, the 

difference between the quantity 

transferred and the quantity shown in the 

DRO.

b. For ammunition and ammunition 

related items only Federal supply group 

((FSG) 13 and for Federal supply 

classification (FSC) 1410, 1420, 1427, 

1440, 5330, 5865, 6810 or 8140), enter an 

M in rp 29 to express in thousands any 

quantity exceeding 99,999. Example:

Express a quantity of 1,950,000 as 1950M 

(1950 in rp 25-28 and an M in rp 29).

Document Number 30-43 Enter document number as shown in the 

DRO.

Suffix Code 44 Leave blank.

Retention Quantity 45-51 Enter quantity actually retained.

Fund 52-53 Perpetuate from the DRO.

Distribution 54 Perpetuate from the DRO.

Blank 55-56 Leave blank.

Denial Date 57-59 Enter date DRO is denied.

Blank 60-66 Leave blank.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 2, November 26, 2019

Change 13

AP8.18-2 APPENDIX 8.18

FIELD LEGEND

RECORD

POSITION(S) ENTRY AND INSTRUCTIONS

Routing Identifier Code

(From)

67-69 Enter RIC identifying the activity preparing 

the denial.

Ownership 70 Enter ownership code, as applicable.

Supply Condition 71 Enter appropriate supply condition code.

Management 72 Enter management code indicating the 

reason for denial.

Blank 73-80 Leave blank.
No. 10-5969.

#### Steven Lee Hyde, Petitioner v. Phillip Valdez.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1039,

178 L. Ed. 2d 857,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 660.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*858Former decision, 562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 420, 178 L. Ed. 2d 328, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8290.