alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                        Duquesne Light Company Directors

     David D. Marshall. Age 48.  Director since April 1995. Chairman, President
     -----------------
and Chief Executive Officer of DQE since June 1999. Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Duquesne Light from June 1999 to August 1999.
President and Chief Executive Officer of DQE and Duquesne Light from August 1996
to June 1999.  Executive Vice President of DQE and President and Chief Operating
Officer of Duquesne Light from February 1995 to August 1996.  Directorships
include DQE, Inc., Allegheny Conference on Community Development and the
Duquesne Club.

     John R. Marshall.  Age 51.  President and Director of Duquesne Light since
     ----------------
August 1999.  Previously Vice President--Consumer and Small Business Market Unit
of Entergy Corporation from 1996 to August 1999.  Vice President--Information
Systems of Entergy Corporation from 1995 to 1996.

     Morgan K. O'Brien.  Age 41.  Director since June 1999.  Chief Operating
     -----------------
Officer of DQE since August 2000.  Executive Vice President--Corporate
Development of DQE from January 2000 to August 2000.  Vice President--Finance of
Duquesne Light from July 1999 to May 2000.  Vice President--Corporate
Development of DQE from July 1999 to January 2000.  Vice President, Controller
and Treasurer of DQE and Vice President--Finance, Controller and Treasurer of
Duquesne Light from November 1998 to July 1999.  Vice President and Controller
of DQE and Vice President and Controller of Duquesne Light from November 1997 to
November 1998.  Controller of DQE and Duquesne Light from October 1995 to
November 1997.

     Victor A. Roque.  Age 54.  Director since June 1999.  Executive Vice
     ---------------
President and General Counsel of DQE since November 1998, and Secretary since
May 2000.  Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Duquesne Light from
November 1998 to April 2000.  Vice President and General Counsel of DQE and
Duquesne Light from April 1995 to November 1998.

     Jack E. Saxer, Jr.  Age 57.  Director since June 1999. Vice President--
     -----------------
Strategic Compensation and Financial Services of DQE since March 2001. Vice
President of DQE from April 1996 to March 2001.  Assistant Vice President--
Administration of Duquesne Light from January 1995 to April 1996.

     William J. DeLeo.  Age 50.  Director since June 1999.  Vice President and
     ----------------
Chief Administrative Officer of DQE since November 1998.  Vice President--
Corporate Services of Duquesne Light Company from November 1998 to April 2000.
Vice President--Marketing and Corporate Performance of Duquesne Light from April
1995 to November 1998.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0075

_________________

VERNON STENSVAD,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

NEWMAN AYERS RANCH, INC.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Olivia Rieger, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 25 2024

09/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0075
- Local97PartI
- Local97PartII
- Local97PartIII
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Joseph Looney, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.

Dated:  November 22, 2005                  /s/  Joseph Looney
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Joseph Looney
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36401-36402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6120-9]


Proposed Settlement Agreement; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; 
Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act 
(``Act''), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed settlement agreement concerning litigation instituted against 
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania. The lawsuit concerns EPA's conditional interim approval 
of the Commonwealth's enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) 
program under section 182(c)(3) of the Act. The parties have agreed to 
settle this matter without litigation. The proposed settlement 
agreement obligates Pennsylvania to make certain additional State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions, which EPA agrees to propose to 
approve. The agreement further obligates EPA to work with Pennsylvania 
to develop an alternative program evaluation methodology that does not 
require the use of mass emission testing technology, or in the 
alternative to conditionally approve a subsequent Pennsylvania I/M 
program evaluation SIP submission if the parties can not develop such a 
methodology
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to 
modified settlement agreement. EPA or the Department of Justice may 
withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement agreement if 
the comments disclose facts or circumstances that indicate that such 
consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with 
the requirements of the Act.
    Copies of the settlement agreement are available from Phyllis 
Cochran, Air and Radiation Law Office (2344), Office of General 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7606.

[[Page 36402]]

Written comments should be sent to Sara Schneeberg at the above address 
and must be submitted on or before August 5, 1998.

    Dated: April 16, 1998.
Scott C. Fulton,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-17810 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
No. 10-7696.

#### Hari Wilburn, Petitioner v. Cathy A. Tate.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1052,

178 L. Ed. 2d 872,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 962.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.

Same case below, 184 Cal. App. 4th 150, 109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 18.
No. 10-7327.

#### Ted A. McCracken, Petitioner v. Ford Motor Company, et al.

562 U.S. 1151, 131 S. Ct. 935,

178 L. Ed. 2d 777,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 228.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 1.
# C&E employee receives award during Navy EOD customer visit

/ Published June 23, 2015
PHILADELPHIA, 

Three Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees recently saw how their work impacts the explosive ordnance disposal customers they support.

The trio from the Construction and Equipment supply chain visited the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division in Maryland June 10.

Their tour of the facilities at Indian Head included seeing the EOD shelters that C&E supplies. The shelters are used as mobile laboratories by the explosives team to do a scientific analysis of explosive devices.

The analysis allows the teams to identify a terrorist group or even an individual “bomb maker,” said Ed McCauley, a customer operations supervisor.

McCauley was accompanied by Jamie Shuster, team chief, and Lauren Retos, a tailored vendor logistics specialist, on the visit.

“When we are working in an office environment and immersed in our day to day responsibilities, it is easy for us to lose sight of how important our work is and the impact it is having on the warfighters we support,” Retos said.

“But the folks at Indian Head really drove home the point that the work we are doing on our end is helping save lives on their end. We are getting them better equipment, better prices and better deliveries on the items they need to fulfill their mission.”

The main reason for the visit was to update the EOD team on changes to the Special Operational Equipment tailored logistics support program. The ordering process is changing due to audit readiness requirements, Retos said.

The EOD team presented an award to Retos for outstanding customer support. In accepting the award, Retos credited the joint effort of C&E’s customer operations and supplier operations teams.

“I hope they will remember how dedicated we are to supporting their mission and that we are available to assist them through every step of the process when they place orders through any of the TLS programs,” Retos said.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO USMD HOLDINGS, INC. 

2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 

The Board of Directors of USMD Holdings, Inc. hereby adopts and approves this First Amendment to the USMD Holdings, Inc. 2010 Equity
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), subject to the consent of shareholders as set forth below. 
 The Plan is hereby amended by
deleting Section 3(a) of the Plan, entitled “Shares Authorized” in its entirety, and replacing it with the following new Section 3(a): 
  

	 	(a)	Shares Authorized. Subject to the adjustment specified below, the aggregate number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Company Stock”) that may be issued or transferred under the Plan
is 2,500,000 shares, any or all of which may be represented by Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock, and/or SARS. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Company Stock that shall be subject to Grants made under the Plan to any individual
during any calendar year shall be 500,000 shares. The shares may be authorized but unissued shares of Company Stock or reacquired shares of Company Stock, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan. If and
to the extent Options granted under the Plan terminate, expire, or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised or if any shares of Restricted Stock are forfeited, the shares subject to such Grants shall again be
available for purposes of the Plan. 

 This Amendment shall be effective upon the consent of the shareholders of USMD
Holdings, Inc. as required by NASDAQ rules or applicable law.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15035]



[[Page 30632]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-98-037]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Norfolk Harbor, 
Elizabeth River, Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements the special local regulations at 33 CFR 
100.501 during the start of the Cock Island Race, a marine event to be 
held in the Elizabeth River, Norfolk and Portsmouth, Virginia on June 
26, 1998. These special local regulations are necessary to control 
vessel traffic in the vicinity of Norfolk Harbor due to the confined 
nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the start 
of the race. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the 
regulated area for the safety of race participants, spectator craft and 
other vessels transiting the event area.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.501 is effective from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on June 26, 
1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer D. Merrill, 
Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Group Hampton Roads, 
4000 Coast Guard Blvd., Portsmouth, VA 23703-2199, (757) 483-8568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ports Events, Inc., will sponsor the Cock 
Island Race on June 26, 1998. The race will consist of 300 sailboats, 
ranging in length from 22' to 60'. The participants will be divided 
into classes, with each class starting at 10 minute intervals from the 
Portsmouth Seawall area of the Elizabeth River. They will race to 
Hampton Roads and return. A large spectator fleet is anticipated. 
Therefore, to ensure the safety of the racers, spectators and 
transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.501 will be in effect during the start 
of the race. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.501, a vessel may not enter 
the regulated area unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander. Because these restrictions will be in effect for a 
limited period, they should not result in a significant disruption of 
maritime traffic.

    Dated: May 26, 1998.
P.M. Stillman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 98-15035 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
How to Use a Nicotine Patch video

AUDIO: Music without lyrics playing through the end of the video.

TITLE ARTCARD - TEXT ON SCREEN: How to Use a Nicotine Patch

VISUALS: The title text is in a box. The background is animated with small patches and colored dots 

crossing diagonally behind the text box.

TEXT ON SCREEN: When you wake up...

VISUALS: Alarm clock shows “7:29” changing to “7:30.” A hand comes into the frame and pushes down 

on the clock to turn alarm off.

AUDIO: Beeping of alarm clock at 7:30; stops when hand pushes down.

TEXT ON SCREEN: remove the old patch and apply a new patch.

VISUALS: Square patch on solid background. A hand comes into the frame and grabs a patch.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Put it on clean, dry, hair-free skin on the upper body. 

VISUALS: The hand presses the patch onto skin on the upper back of the body.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Avoid wearing the patch on the same area more than once a week.

VISUALS: Seven images of the patch on different parts of the upper body appear. Under each image is a 

letter for the day of the week (M, T, W, T, F, S, S).

TEXT ON SCREEN: Proper use will help you avoid side effects...

VISUALS: Solid background.

TEXT ON SCREEN: and stay quit.

VISUALS: An arm with its hand in a “thumbs up” gesture enters the frame.
END ARTCARD 1 – TEXT ON SCREEN:

For more help using medicines to quit smoking

Call 1-800-QUIT-NOW

Visit CDC.gov/quit

VISUALS: The text is in a box. The background is animated with small patches and colored dots crossing 

diagonally behind the text box.

END ARTCARD 2 – TEXT ON SCREEN:

This video is a part of the SmokefreeVET partnership between the Department of Veterans Affairs and 

the National Cancer Institute’s Smokefree.gov Initiative.

CDC does not endorse any particular organization, product, or service.

VISUALS: Joint logos of the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention.
#### Felix Armas et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Kenneth Yuska, Respondent-Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 641]

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 13, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and, in effect, denied their cross motion, inter alia, for leave to amend the complaint, and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as, sua sponte, directed him to return the contract deposit to the plaintiffs.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, so much of the notice of cross appeal as purports to cross-appeal as of right from that portion of the order, as, sua sponte, directed the defendant to return the contract deposit to the plaintiffs is treated as an application for leave to cross-appeal from that portion of the order, and leave to cross-appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

*661Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as cross-appealed from, on the law; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

However, the Supreme Court erred in directing the defendant to return the contract deposit to the plaintiffs. A vendee who defaults on a real estate contract without lawful excuse cannot recover the down payment *(see Cipriano v Glen Cove Lodge No. 1458,*1 NY3d 53 [2003]; *Maxton Bldrs. v Lo Galbo,*68 NY2d 373, 378 [1986]; *Zahl v Greenfield,*162 AD2d 449 [1990]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions either are without merit or academic in light of our determination. Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
No. 10-7987.

#### Javiar Gaspar, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1031,

178 L. Ed. 2d 852,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 637.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 259.
No. 09-10706.

#### Alexander Samuel, Petitioner v. Bellevue Hospital Center.

562 U.S. 1089, 131 S. Ct. 698,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9040.

178 L. Ed. 2d 528,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 100, 178 L. Ed. 2d 247, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7722.
#### PA Energy Vision, LLC v. South Avis Realty, Inc.

04/26/2016

757 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-2-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-2-1997
<CASH>                                           7,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     80,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,842
<PP&E>                                          59,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,808
<SALES>                                        278,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,819
<CGS>                                          186,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-40-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Site Visit

January 20, 1998.
    On January 27, 1998, the Office of Pipeline Regulation staff will 
conduct a site visit of the proposed East Tennessee Natural Gas Company 
Virginia Expansion project in Washington, Smyth, and Wythe Counties, 
Virginia. All parties may attend. Those planning to attend must provide 
their own transportation.
    For information about where the site inspection will begin, please 
contact Paul McKee at (202) 208-1088.
Robert J. Cupina,
Deputy Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-1678 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7185.

#### Buster O’Neal, Jr., Petitioner v. L. Gale Buckner, et al.

562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 833,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9802,

178 L. Ed. 2d 567,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Cobb County, denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
   (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed
   with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
   "Report"), I, Stanford R. Ovshinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the
   Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
   to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


   October 22, 2003




   /s/ Stanford R. Ovshinsky
   -------------------------
   Chief Executive Officer





                                        144