alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-76,219-01

EX P ARTE ANTONIO MARK EITH O’NEAL, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 59CR1100-HC IN THE 6TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM RED RIVER C OUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated robber y and sente nced to ninety-nine year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends, among o th e r things, that he was denied his right to appea l this conviction beca use appellate counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. We rema nded this application to the trial cour

t for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. The trial court has determined that Applicant’s appe llate counse l died in an accident on or about May 2 8 , 2 0 0 2

. Al though the rea sons for appellate counsel’s failure to timely file notice of2

appea l cannot be asce rtained, it is clea r that Applicant expressed a desire to appea l this conviction, and that appellate counsel made an attempt to timely file notice of appea l in this case . Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 59-CR-11-00 from the 6th District Court of Red River County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at w h i ch he may g ive a written not ice of appea l so that he may then, wit h the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful ap p ea l

. W i t h in ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether

Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be r epre sented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if t h e sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a wri tten notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant' s rema ining claims are dismiss ed. See Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this opinion s h all be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 30, 2013 Do not publish
No. 10-6323.

#### Christopher Irby, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 904,

178 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 68.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Same case below, 327 S.W.3d 138.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC-federal).

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June 29, 1998.

PLACE: 6903 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20817.

STATUS: The telephonic meeting of the Board of USEC Inc., a Delaware-
chartered corporation, was closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Organizational, financial and commercial 
matters of USEC Inc., a Delaware-chartered corporation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Stuckle 301-564-3399.

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer, USEC-Federal.
[FR Doc. 98-17819 Filed 6-30-98; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
No. 10-6066.

#### James Swon, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 514,

178 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8615.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
No. 10-7784.

#### Ascencion Hernandez-Perez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1161, 131 S. Ct. 968,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 411.

178 L. Ed. 2d 796,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 506.
# New Cumberland community supported during Federal Day of Service

/ Published Oct. 21, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
On Oct. 16, more than 230 federal workers throughout Pennsylvania’s Capital Region volunteered their time at local nonprofits as part of the third annual Federal Day of Service.  Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s commander, Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix, along with local military and family members volunteered their time at the West Shore Senior Center, distributing food and other necessities to those less fortunate.
United Way of the Capital Region matched volunteers with projects such as painting, landscaping, sorting donations, stocking food pantry shelves and general clean-up.  One group spent the day hosting an apple festival for residents at a local nursing home.

Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna volunteers included Dix, DLA Distribution headquarters employees, DLA Distribution Susquehanna employees, and several members of the Army Rigger’s unit assigned to the distribution center.

Several of the volunteers plan to continue assisting at the senior center in the months to come.
# Laskodi makes inaugural visit to Anniston distribution center

/ Published July 25, 2016
ANNISTON, Alabama, 
On July 13-14, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi made his inaugural visit to DLA Distribution Anniston, Ala., to meet employees, discuss small arms operations, and see the distribution center’s wall-to-wall weapons inventory in action.

The small arms facility at Anniston is one of the more unique in the distribution network, where employees receive, identify, send for overhaul, and stow small arms for the warfighter.  The team has implemented new standardized processes to improve customer support, as well as save time and money.  Some of these processes include quality control procedures and a specialized database created by the division that helps to reliably identify the hundreds of different types of arms they receive.

The distribution center is conducting a wall-to-wall inventory and labeling of material, consisting of more than one million serialized and non-serialized materials stored in the small arms facilities.  More than 130 DLA Distribution employees and reservists from all branches of the armed services augmented this mission.   The completion of the inventory will assist with audit readiness assertion this year.

Laskodi also had a chance to operate the only DoD-owned 80-ton heavy lift crane, known as "Clyde," as well as a tractor from the Vehicles and Artillery Division.  The crane is used for loading and unloading tracked vehicles and artillery.

Army Lt. Col. Michael Lindley, commander of the Anniston distribution center, noted that Laskodi is looking forward to focusing on the way ahead, including communicating with customers on equipment, appropriate metrics for the distribution center, and working on Care of Supplies in Storage and being good stewards of taxpayer dollars.

While on site, Laskodi met with strategic partners, including Army Col. Martine Kidd, the Anniston Army Depot commander, whom Laskodi discussed the importance of the two commands’ partnership.  Kidd likened the partnership to planting "perennials rather than annual flowers."
No. 10-5929.

#### Johnny R. Buckner, Petitioner v. Jay Jones, et al.

562 U.S. 1066, 131 S. Ct. 643,

178 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9382.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
June 19, 1998

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: OST-98-3959.
Date Filed: June 15, 1998.
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
Subject: 14PTC3 Telex Mail Vote 944
    Korea-Russia fares
    Intended effective date: June 18, 1998.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-17254 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2680 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2680

 To amend section 330C of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 
special programs for Indians for providing services for the prevention 
           and treatment of diabetes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2019

 Mr. O'Halleran (for himself, Mr. Cole, Ms. Haaland, Ms. DeGette, Mr. 
Reed, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 330C of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 
special programs for Indians for providing services for the prevention 
           and treatment of diabetes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Diabetes Programs for 
Indians Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAMS FOR INDIANS FOR 
              DIABETES SERVICES.

    Section 330C(c)(2)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254c-3(c)(2)(D)) is amended after ``$150,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2018 and 2019'' by inserting ``and $200,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ STUART GRAYSTON                                                  
|Stuart Grayston President and chief executive
officer August 14, 2006



16
# C_2015146EN.01003201.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 December 2014 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-116/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 146/40)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsDRS Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-14487, 333-119977 and 333-83700)on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-130926)on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-129948)on Form S-4 of DRS Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated June 9,2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DRS Technologies, Inc.and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveearnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,2006, which reports appear in the March 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-Kof DRS Technologies, Inc.

Our reportdated June 9, 2006, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, contains anexplanatory paragraph that states that management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and our audit ofinternal control over financial reporting of DRS Technologies, Inc. andsubsidiaries excludes an evaluation of internal control over financialreporting of Engineered Support Systems, Inc. and Codem Systems, Inc., acquiredbusinesses.
| /s/ KPMG LLP            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Short Hills, New Jersey |
| June 9, 2006       |

 

----
# C_2013344EN.01005801.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/58

---

Action brought on 3 September 2013 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)

(Case T-478/13)

2013/C 344/106

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2013 given in Case R 1000/2012-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2013 given in Case R 1000/2012-5;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ENFORE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 10 059 624

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EINFOREX’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark registration No 6 530 927

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2013252EN.01003701.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/37

---

Action brought on 21 June 2013 — Energa Power Trading v Commission

(Case T-338/13)

2013/C 252/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Energa Power Trading Promitheias kai Emporias Energeias AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare and rule that the Commission has failed to fulfill its obligations under the Treaty, since, despite having been formally requested to do so, it failed to define its position on the complaint lodged on 9 December 2010, concerning State aid which the Greek authorities unlawfully granted to DEI; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare and rule that the Commission has failed to fulfill its obligations under the Treaty, since, despite having been formally requested to do so, it failed to define its position on the complaint lodged on 9 December 2010, concerning State aid which the Greek authorities unlawfully granted to DEI; and

| — | Order that the Commission bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the Commission bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Commission has failed to act in relation to the alleged illegal State aid granted in favour of DEI.

By omitting to take a position — positive or negative — on the applicant’s complaint alleging illegal state aid granted in favour of DEI despite the submission of a formal notice for after a period of more than 28 months (and at any rate more than 26 months), the Commission has failed to close the preliminary investigation within reasonable time. To the extent that the aforementioned delay may not justified by reference to any exceptional circumstances the Commission has failed to act despite its respective exclusive competence, thus contravening the relate provisions of the Treaty (namely, Articles 106, 107 and 265 TFEU) and Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty.

---
Circuit Court for Charles C ounty

Case No. C

- 08

- CV

- 21

- 000250

Argued: September 6, 2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

No. 6

September T erm , 20 2 4

GREENMARK PROPERTIES, LLC

v.

PARTS, INC., ET AL.

Fader , C.J.,

Watts

Booth

Biran

Gould

Eaves

Killough

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: September 10 , 202 4

### ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument , it is this 10 th day of

September 202 4

, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs as improvidently

granted and No. 6, September Term, 2024 is closed in this Court ; and it is further

ORDERED that costs are to be paid by Petitioner

.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice GREENMARK PROPERTIES, LLC

v.

PARTS, INC., ET AL. *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

Pet. No. 303, September Term, 2024

N o. 6

, September Term, 202 4
Exhibit 10.38

Escalade,
Incorporated
Schedule of Director Compensation

Each director of Escalade, Incorporated currently
receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000 with the exception of the Chairman
of the Board who receives an annual cash retainer of $50,000.  Each member of the Audit Committee receives
an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the committee Chairman who
receives $15,000. Each member of the Compensation Committee receives an
additional annual fee of $3,000 except for the committee Chairman who receives
$10,000. All Directors receive an additional fee of $1,000 per board meeting
attended in excess of eight meetings per year. Members of the Audit Committee
and Compensation Committee receive additional fees of $1,000 per committee
meeting attended in excess of six and four meetings, respectively.

Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007
Incentive Plan, Directors can elect to receive earned compensation as either
cash, stock or restricted units.

---
Those things you

will never happen to you? 	 	 	 They 

Mark, age 47, California

Mark smoked and got rectal cancer. 

His ostomy bag was taped over a hole 

in his stomach. That’s where his

bowel movements went. Mark had to 

wear a bag after his surgery to remove 

his tumor. Mark didn’t know smoking can 

cause colorectal cancer. Now you do. 

Screening saves lives. 

You can quit smoking.

CALL 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
<PAGE>

                           EXHIBIT 23.1
                           ------------


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Envirodyne Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-10689 and 333-12829) of our report dated March
20, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedules of Envirodyne Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 25, 1997 and December 26, 1996, and for
the periods December 27, 1996 to December 25, 1997, December 29,
1995 to December 26, 1996 and December 30, 1994 to December 28,
1995, which report is included in the annual report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-02329]


Penske Logistics, Incorporated, Bloomington, IN; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Acting Director of the Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Penske Logistics, 
Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana. The review indicated that the 
application contained no new substantial information which would bear 
importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of 
the application was issued.

NAFTA-02329; Penske Logistics, Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana 
(June 11, 1998).

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day of June, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-16551 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 10-7602.

#### Fidel S. Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 952,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 398.

178 L. Ed. 2d 786,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 1001.
No. 10-5545.

#### Orestes Cabrera, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 853,

178 L. Ed. 2d 584,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9610.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 928, 131 S. Ct. 316, 178 L. Ed. 2d 206, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7157.
No. 10-5512.

#### Steven Ray Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 820,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9699.

178 L. Ed. 2d 561,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 368.