alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Elie S.
Akilian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Inet Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the aforementioned Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Elie S. Akilian

---

President and Chief Executive Officer



August 5, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00222-CR

Jacob Cory GONZALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8528A

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of C.W., a child.

D.S.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and 

STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE,

Appellees.

No. 2D2024-0369

August 21, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. 

Campbell, Judge.

David A. Dee of Tampa, for Appellant.

Mary Soorus of Children's Legal Services, Tampa, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Blake Lynne 

Bruce, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Appellee Statewide Guardian Ad 

Litem Office.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUT, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. 
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# C_2015198EN.01003401.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2015 — Saferoad RRS v OHIM (MEGARAIL)

(Case T-137/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark MEGARAIL - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 198/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saferoad RRS GmbH (Weroth, Germany) (represented by: C. Czychowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 January 2013 (Case R 2536/2011-4) relating to the application for registration of the word sign MEGARAIL as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Saferoad RRS GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Saferoad RRS GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                           R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION
                       SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PLAN

Whereas, at the time of the spin-off of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation ("D&B")
from R.H. Donnelley Corporation effective July 1, 1998, R.H. Donnelley, as the
surviving corporation ("RHD"), adopted the Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan
("Plan") for the benefit of certain executive officers who had participated
under the Plan as employees of D&B;

Whereas, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of
RHD, who administers all executive compensation and benefit plans of RHD, has
approved the following amendment to the Plan;

The Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan is hereby amended as follows:

Section 4.5 is amended by changing the existing second paragraph to be paragraph
(b), the existing paragraph (b) to be paragraph (c), the existing paragraph (c)
to be paragraph (d), by changing the two references in paragraph (d) (formerly
paragraph (c)) to Section 4.5 (b)(i) to be references to Section 4.5 (a)(i) and
by adding at the end thereof a new paragraph (e) to read as follows:

         (e)      Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 4.5,
                  a Participant may elect, in accordance with rules prescribed
                  by the Committee, that upon his termination of employment an
                  amount equal to the lump sum value of his Retirement Benefit,
                  determined as of such date of termination of employment in the
                  same manner as provided under Section 4.5(a), shall be
                  transferred as an obligation of the Corporation to such
                  Participant's record keeping account under the Corporation's
                  Deferred Compensation Plan.
<PAGE>   2
In witness whereof, this Amendment No. 1 has been executed by the Company
effective as of the 26th day of September, 2000.

R.H. Donnelley Corporation

/c/ Frank R. Noonan
Frank R. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# Chilean Navy visits DLA Distribution

/ Published Nov. 1, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Members of the Chilean Navy visited the largest distribution center in the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution network, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., on Oct. 28 to discuss DLA’s global logistics processes and how DLA Distribution supports foreign military sales customers.  The visit included Rear Adm. Guido Cabrera, supply director of the Chilean Navy.

Jim McCormack, deputy director of Business Development at DLA Distribution headquarters, led a discussion which highlighted DLA Distribution’s worldwide network, special functions the command provides - such as kitting and hazardous material handling - and transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA.

The group then toured the Eastern Distribution Center, the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse.  Army Col. Brad Eungard, DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s commander, led the group through the organization’s key locations, including receiving operations, the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area.

The visit was part of DLA Distribution’s ongoing efforts to partner with warfighting customers to provide efficient, effective, and best value support.
# C_2016016EN.01001101.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 November 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)

(Case C-325/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3(1) - Communication to the public - Definition of ‘communication’ and ‘public’ - Distribution of television programmes - Process known as ‘direct injection’))

(2016/C 016/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SBS Belgium NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that a broadcasting organisation does not carry out an act of communication to the public, within the meaning of that provision, when it transmits its programme-carrying signals exclusively to signal distributors without those signals being accessible to the public during, and as a result of that transmission, those distributors then sending those signals to their respective subscribers so that they may watch those programmes, unless the intervention of the distributors in question is just a technical means, which it is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JEROME ROBINSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 342 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-265-000]


Sabine Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, Sabine Pipe Line Company 
(Sabine) tendered for filing the tariff sheets listed on Attachment A 
to the filing, to become effective August 1, 1998.
    Sabine states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's order issued April 16, 1998, in Docket No. RM96-1-007.
    Sabine states that the instant filing reflects changes to the 
General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff required to implement 
standards issued by GISB and adopted by the Commission in Order No. 
587-G issued April 16, 1998, in Docket No. RM96-1-007. The filing also 
implements changes required by Commission Regulations Section 
284.10(c)(3) (ii) through (v), including posting to Sabine's Internet 
web site of information required by GISB Standard 4.3.6. Sabine is also 
implementing changes to its FERC Gas Tariff reflecting the adoption of 
Section 284.10(c)(3)(i) of the Regulations relating to communication of 
electronic information and transactions using the public Internet.
    Sabine states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its 
customers, state commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18161 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7631.

#### Levi Ford, Petitioner v. D. K. Sisto, Warden.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1049,

178 L. Ed. 2d 869,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 942.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2830 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2830

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
       create a task force to process applications submitted for 
determinations, assessments, and waivers for unmanned aircraft systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2019

 Mr. Meadows (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, and Mr. Rouzer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
       create a task force to process applications submitted for 
determinations, assessments, and waivers for unmanned aircraft systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drone Backlog Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM WAIVER TASK FORCE.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall establish an Unmanned Aircraft System Waiver Task 
Force (hereinafter referred to as the ``Task Force'') to carry out the 
duties described in subsection (b).
    (b) Duties.--The Task Force shall process applications submitted 
for determinations and assessments under section 44807 of title 49, 
United States Code, and waivers for small unmanned aircraft systems 
under subpart D of part 107 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, 
to reduce the backlog and processing time of outstanding waiver or 
exemption applications.
    (c) Membership.--The Task Force shall be composed of such employees 
of the Federal Aviation Administration as the Administrator considers 
appropriate.
    (d) Termination.--The Task Force shall terminate on the date that 
is 3 years after the establishment of the Task Force.
    (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
termination of the Task Force, the Administrator shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate a report containing a description of the 
activities carried out by the Task Force, including the number of 
waivers processed by the Task Force.
                                 <all>
```
March 12, 2015 

Mr. John Bray 

585 Pocahantas Drive 

Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547 

Dear Mr. Bray: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your January 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf of I Drone Your Home into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0071), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
<PAGE>

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
               ---------------------------------------------------


         We have issued our report dated April 18, 2001, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
of Environmental Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year ended February 23, 2001 and Part II of this form. We have also audited
Schedule II for each of the three years in the period ended February 23, 2001.
In our opinion, this schedule represents fairly, in all material respects, the
information required to be set forth therein. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of
Environmental Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries of Form S-8 (File No.
333-65469, effective October 8, 1998), Form S-8 (File No 2-92407, effective
August 14, 1984) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-42219, effective September 4,
1991).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 28, 2002
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersignedofficer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
| Date:  August 9, 2006 |                                                                 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | /s/ Thomas E. D’Ambra                                           |
|                  | Name: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.                                  |
|                  | Title: Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1	 Pre-decisional: for internal use only. 

Tips	From	Former	Smokers	Tips	2018/Vignettes	

Sharon/“Diagnosed	at	37”	1:04	

The	vignette opens	on	the	title	“Diagnosed	at	37.	A	Former	Smoker’s	Story,”	and	cuts	to	a	shot	of	Sharon	

sitting	in	a	chair	by	a	table	inside	her	home,	speaking	to	the	camera.			

SHARON:	I	was	diagnosed	at	37.		

We see	a	picture	of	Sharon	as	a	young	mom	with	her	two	daughters.	

SHARON:	I	had	two	children.	

The	camera	cuts	back	to	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.		

SHARON:	Made	the	kid’s	lunches,	took	‘em	to	school.	You	know,	was	on	the	PTA.	

We	see	another	picture	of	Sharon	as	a	young	mother,	healthy	and	smiling.		

SHARON:	I	started	feeling	tired.	Then	I	thought	I	had	swollen	glands.	

The	camera	cuts	back	to	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.		

SHARON:	Life	was	going	to	change	for	me	pretty	quick.		

We	see	Sharon	entering	her	backdoor.			

SHARON:	Went	to	the	doctor	and	he	put	me	on	an	antibiotic.	Week	later	I	started	feeling	like,	a	lump—	

The	camera	cuts	back	to	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.		

SHARON:	at	the	side	of	my	neck.	They	immediately	took	an	x-ray	and	said,	“That’s	a	tumor”.	

We	then	see	Sharon	in	her	kitchen,	unpacking	groceries.		

SHARON:	They	did	the	biopsy,	found	out	it	was	cancer,	started	me	on	chemo	and	radiation	right	away.	

The	camera	cuts	back	to	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.		

SHARON:	Since	I	was	so	young,	they	wanted	to	try	to	save	my	voice.	

We	see	Sharon	once	more	in	her	kitchen,	continuing	to	unpack	her	groceries.			

SHARON:	And	I	was	OK	for	about	a	year.	
Pre-decisional: for internal use only. 2	

The	camera	cuts	back	to	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.		

SHARON:	Then	I	was	brushing	my	teeth,	and—	

The	vignette	cuts	back	to	Sharon	in	the	kitchen,	placing	items	in	the	refrigerator.		

SHARON:	I	spit	up	some	blood,	so	went	to	the	doctor	and	he’s	like—	

The	vignette	ends	with	Sharon	speaking	to	the	camera.			

SHARON:	Next	step	is:	we	gotta	remove	the	voice	box.	

ART	CARD:	CDC	LOGO		

BROUGHT	TO	YOU	BY	THE	U.S.	DEPARTMENT	OF	HEALTH	AND	HUMAN	SERVICES.