alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No: FAA-2015-1998 

Directorate ID: 2014-SW-035-AD 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Disposition Comments 

Next Step: g{"RAN 0 SNPRM 

0 These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

ZNo Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

Yc{9 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope ofthe 

previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact/he Directorate focal point 

for guidance. I utc-..1 Rc\ i-..tnn. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments rela ting to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1 C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: ( IHl\ISl' ntlL'. 

{f other, explain: 

Commenter(s): ('lid, h~r~ I<) ctth:r lL''d. 

What change to the AD action is requested? ('lid. h~t"-.' In cnt~r text. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Cli~.:k hct~.. to ~ntcr il'\1. 

Do we agree? Y l'!-. · 1

t ) 

If YES, we agree because In"I..'JI ju-..ti lication Make the following changes to the AD: List an~ 

change:-. tu the :\D 

lf PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with ln .... crt lC'\1 because [ns~.:tl ju:-.tilication We disagree with 

ln s~.?rl lc'\1 because Jn,ntju~tilil:atillll Make the following changes to the AD: Li-..t an) 

~.. .. tn);l''- Ill the .\D 

If NO, we don't agree because ln'>crl out rat ionale 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: Chol)SL' on('. 

{[other, explain: Clid, lll'l'l' Ill cnh.:r ll''\1. 

Commenter(s): ( ltd. here to enter text. 

What change to the AD action is requested? ('lick here to llll\.'r tc:-..t. 

Why is the change requested or how is it j ustified? l'lick hl·t-c to enter lc\1. 

Do we agree? Yc-; i\o 

Page 1 of3 
If YES, we agree because ln'>~rt ju~ti I ic<llion Make the following changes to the AD: List am 

.... han~c" 1~1 the \I) 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with [JbL'rl lc\t because lnscrtjustili~.:ation We disagree with 

ln:--crl k\1 because lns~rt just i lic.uton Make the following changes to the AD: l.i,t an) 

changes to the ,\I) 

If NO, we don't agree because Insert out ratinn.tk 

For additional issues, double-click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date 

Branch Manager Date 

Page 3 of3
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.15




                                  July 29, 2004


Phylis M. Esposito
434 East 52nd Street
Penthouse East
New York, New York  10022

         Re:      Executive Employment Agreement

Dear Phylis:

         The purpose of the letter is to set out certain action taken by you and
the Company with regard to your employment. In 2003, it was agreed that your
Executive Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2002 ("Agreement"), would be
renewed for the additional 12 months referred to in the Agreement as the Renewal
Term. The full Term of your Agreement (including the initial and the Renewal
Term) was to end on June 30, 2004. Recently, you and Joe Moglia, on behalf of
Ameritrade, agreed to extend the Term of your Agreement for another 12 months,
ending on June 30, 2005.

         At the time when your Agreement was renewed for the first 12 month
Renewal Term, it was agreed that in addition to continuing your role as head of
Investor Relations, you would head-up the newly created Government Relations
function and no longer be responsible for corporate communications or marketing.

         Please indicate by signing the letter is the space below that the
description above accurately represents the understanding reached between you
and the Company and return one fully signed letter to me. Please keep one copy
for your files.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION


                                            By: /s/ Kurt Halvorson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Kurt Halvorson
                                                Chief Administrative Office

The undersigned agrees that this letter accurately sets out the agreement
reached between the undersigned and Ameritrade.

/s/ Phylis M. Esposito
----------------------
Phylis M. Esposito
EXHIBIT 99.2

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Gordon S. Donovan,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Viskase Companies, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Viskase Companies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Viskase
Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Viskase Companies, Inc.


Date:  March 31, 2003


                                  /s/  Gordon S. Donovan
                                  ----------------------
                                  Gordon S. Donovan
                                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptive.Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules 

### EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair andDeceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules 

### Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT .·. ;", . )**,~\_ -~·** **-~~-** -- --
,,_ .....**~**



### DOT-OST-1995-272. formerly Docket 49233



### The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed ·by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.j 2
There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: June 28, 2013
Respectfully submitted,

# ~ 

# e:=::::**~--- ~~uel**  Podberesky

- Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366.,9342 FAX: 202-366-71523
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this 28th day ofJune, 2013, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.Sy Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
EXHIBIT 23
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
as of February 1, 1998 and February 2, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended February 1, 1998, which report
appears in the February 1, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-
ALCO Stores, Inc.



     /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

          Wichita, Kansas
          April 28, 1998


<PAGE 42>
</PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Anthony W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[59 NYS3d 101]—

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Jacqueline D. Williams, J.), dated July 20, 2016. The order of disposition adjudicated the appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon an order of fact-finding of that court dated February 22, 2016, made upon his admission, finding that he *709committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and placed him on enhanced supervision probation for a period of 13 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in placing the appellant on probation under the enhanced supervision program for a period of 13 months, based upon his admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. The court has broad discretion in determining the proper disposition in a juvenile delinquency proceeding, and its determination is accorded great deference *(see Matter of Norell A.-T.,*141 AD3d 712, 713 [2016]; *Matter of Kieron C.,*140 AD3d 1160, 1161 [2016]). “‘[T]he least restrictive alternative test does not require the court to actually try the lowest form of intervention, have it fail, and then try each succeeding level of intervention’ ” *(Matter of Sharice B.,*149 AD3d 833, 833 [2017], quoting *Matter of Tristan*W., 258 AD2d 585, 586 [1999]; see *Matter of Leah G.,*23 AD3d 658, 658 [2005]). The disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with the needs and best interests of the appellant and the need for protection of the community in light of, inter alia, the recommendation in the probation report, the appellant’s mother’s professed inability to adequately supervise him on her own, the appellant’s academic problems, and the evidence demonstrating that he continued to smoke marijuana and stole from his mother after the order of fact-finding was issued *(see Matter of Tanaja F.,*147 AD3d 936, 937 [2017]; *Matter of Elijah*G., 138 AD3d 839 [2016]; *Matter of Shaundale*W., 82 AD3d 1254, 1255 [2011]; *Matter of Ashley P.,*74 AD3d 1075, 1076 [2010]; *Matter of Antonio C.,*294 AD2d 123, 124 [2002]).

Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We have issued our reports dated September 12, 2005,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of Quixote Corporation on Form 10-K forthe year ended June 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74488, 333-62933,333-81955, 333-32872, 333-56120, 333-83404, 333-120850 and 333-120852)and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113504, 333-106895 and 333-12345) of QuixoteCorporation of our reports dated September 12, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in theForm 10-K.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago, IllinoisSeptember 12, 2005

----
### Schmeltz, Rachel From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: 

### Subject: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron

_ L

_

Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Wednesday, December 16, 2015 6:02 PM Schmeltz, Rache l Friedman, Kristina; Vanlare, Paula; Tate, Ragan; Banks, Julius; Laity, Jim Conclusion of EO 12866 and 13563 Review: EPA Proposed Rule-- 2015 Revisions and Confidentia li ty Determinations for Data Elements Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (RIN 2060 -AS60)
This email serves as notice that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has concluded its review with a conclusion action of cons i stent with change under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 of the U.S. Env ironmental Protection Agency's (EPA) p r oposed rule titled 

### 2015 Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Data Elements Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (RI N 2060 -A$60). Please let me kn ow if you have any questi ons or comments. Thank you. Aaron 

### L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Management and Bu dget 202-395-3621 Aaron L Szabo@omb.eop.gov
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION906****OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,(the “Report”), of Triton PCS, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

(2)

the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |        |   | By:  | /s/ MICHAEL E. KALOGRIS |
|   |   |   |   |   |  |
|   |   |   |   | Name:  | **Michael E. Kalogris** |
|   |   |   |   | Title:  | **Chief Executive Officer** |
|   |   |   |   | Date:  | **May 15, 2003** |
No. 10-6339.

#### Martin Del Valle-Cisneros, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 904,

178 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 385.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 319.
# C_2013207EN.01005202.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/52

---

Appeal brought on 22 May 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 March 2013 in Case F-131/12 Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-283/13 P)

2013/C 207/85

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Set aside in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal.

| — | Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are same as those relied on in Case T-203/13 P Marcuccio v Commission.

Marcuccio

Commission

---
# C_2015026EN.01003201.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/32

---

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid)

(Case T-298/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 026/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LemonAid Beverages GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Natzel, lawyers, and P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Pret a Manger (Europe) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and S. Croxon, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2013 (Case R 276/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Pret à Manger (Europe) Ltd and LemonAid Beverages GmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.2.2013.

1

---
2017-0097.

#### Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Taylor.

Summit App. No. 28069, 2016-Ohio-7090. On appellee’s motion to strike notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction due to improper service. Motion denied. Appellee may file a memorandum in response within 30 days of the date of this entry.
No. 10-7002.

#### Kelechi Emeruwa, Petitioner v. Maryland.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 802,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9504.

178 L. Ed. 2d 537,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 189 Md. App. 720.
Tips From Former Smokers® 2022 New TV Spots

Michael F. “Family” :30 – URL CTA 

ISCI Code VCDC1176000H

The spot opens on the A Tip From A Former Smoker® logo and cuts to a shot of Michael F. in 

his kitchen using a device to help him breathe. 

MICHAEL F: COPD is harder on the folks around you, I think. 

The spot cuts to a photograph of Michael F. and his wife. 

MICHAEL F: It affects my wife terribly. And she smokes, and she quit. 

The spot cuts to a shot of Michael F. sitting in his living room. Text appears on the bottom 

right-hand corner of the screen that reads “Michael, 57” and his home state of “Florida.”

MICHAEL F: And if you ask her why she quit, she’ll say because she needs to be here for—to 

take care of me, so. Sorry. 

The spot cuts to an art card that reads “The people you love are worth quitting for.”

ANNCR: The people you love are worth quitting for. 

ART CARD: 

You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS

CDC Logo

Sponsored by the U.S. department of Health and Human Services.

#CDCTIPS 

ANNCR: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS
No. 10-7848.

#### Roy Mosley, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 972,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 58.

178 L. Ed. 2d 798,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-172.

#### Amanda Jean Florance, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 896, 131 S. Ct. 337,

178 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6637.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to. §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MURRAY
NICOL                                                      
|                                                                         
|Murray Nicol Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2003
Exhibit 10.27





Escalade, Incorporated


Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation





Compensation for the executive officers of Escalade, Incorporated consists of a base salary, bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or restricted stock unit grants.





Base Salary


In general, base salaries are set at the beginning of each year based upon changes in the employee’s level of responsibility, individual performance reviews conducted by the Company’s Compensation Committee and changes in the cost of living.





Bonuses


The Company’s Compensation Committee has established a profit incentive plan that provides for the payment of cash bonuses if certain performance targets are achieved. Under the plan, the Compensation Committee establishes target performance levels early in each fiscal year, subject to potential changes that the Committee may determine appropriate. Virtually all employees are eligible to participate in the profit incentive plan. In conjunction with the completion of the Company’s annual audited financial statements, the bonus pool is finalized based on actual results achieved. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based upon a review of the overall Company’s performance relative to budget, the Company’s strategic position, and individual executive officer’s performance relative to budget. There are no pre-defined methods for allocating the bonus pool to any of the Company’s executive officers.





Long-Term Incentives


Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive compensation in various forms including stock options and restricted stock units. The Company’s Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form, amount and timing of these grants which historically have been annual grants. In its determination of annul grants, the Compensation Committee considers performance of both the individual and the Company.





Additional Benefits


Executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and receive Company matching contributions in accordance with the plan terms. The Company also pays group term life insurance benefits on behalf of executive officers. The Company’s Chairman of the Board, Robert Griffin, participated in a salary deferral plan that earned interest on undistributed amounts at the rate of 9% per annum. The entire balance of this plan was distributed to Mr. Griffin in a taxable transaction in April 2010.