alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 

HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust, or the Company, for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $35,000, plus a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,000 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $12,500, $7,500 and $7,500, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
EXHIBIT 10.19
 DEX ONE CORPORATION
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program
(Approved February 22, 2010; retroactively effective to January 29, 2010)
 Board Member Compensation
 ►
    
    $125,000 annually ($50,000 cash plus $75,000 stock) (For 2010, payable on March
1, 2010; for 2011 and subsequent years, payable immediately following election of
directors at annual stockholders meeting)
 Lead Director and Committee Chair Compensation (all amounts payable in cash quarterly)
 ►
    
    Lead Director: $75,000 annually►
    
    Chair of Audit and Finance Committee: $25,000 annually►
    
    Chair of Compensation and Benefits Committee: $15,000 annually►
    
    Chair of Corporate Governance Committee: $15,000 annually
 Additional Compensation (all amounts payable in cash quarterly)
 ►
    
    Meeting Fees: $2,000 per board meeting attended and $2,000 per committee meeting
attended (for committee members attending their own committee meetings only)►
    
    Additionally, board members will be reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses
associated with attendance at Board and Board committee meetings and other Dex One
business
#### Lamb, Matter of, v Egan

2d Dept: 150 AD3d 854

denied
No. 10-6451.

#### Lucrecious Towers, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 574,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8664.

178 L. Ed. 2d 419,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 397 Ill. App. 3d 1109, 370 Ill. Dec. 466, 988 N.E.2d 242.
No. 10-7034.

#### Victor Vallin-Jauregui, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 618,

178 L. Ed. 2d 449,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8946.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 745.
# C_2016402EN.01002501.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori v Commission

(Case T-220/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Municipal real estate tax - Exemption granted to non-commercial entities carrying out specific activities - Consolidated text on income tax - Exemption of the one-off municipal tax - Decision partly finding the absence of State aid and party declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Absolute impossibility of recovery - Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 402/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: initially A. Nucara and E. Gambaro, then E. Gambaro, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, then G. Conte, D. Grespan and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri and G. De Bellis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision of 19 December 2012 on State aid SA.20829 (C 26/2010, ex NN 43/2010 (ex CP 71/2006)) Scheme concerning the municipal real estate tax exemption granted to real estate used by non-commercial entities for specific purposes implemented by Italy (OJ 2013 L 166, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3) | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs relating to its intervention. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs relating to its intervention.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40549 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Armando Bazan, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:15-CR-975-1 

______________________________ 

Before Elrod, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Armando Bazan, federal prisoner # 64509-079, moves for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of 

his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). In order to proceed IFP, Bazan must show that he is a 

pauper and that he will raise a nonfrivolous appellate issue. Carson v. Polley, 

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

January 9, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40549 Document: 00516603483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023
No. 22-40549 

2 

A review of Bazan’s financial documentation reveals that he is not 

financially eligible for IFP status. See Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & 

Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948). Accordingly, his motion for leave to 

proceed IFP is DENIED. Bazan is ORDERED to pay the clerk of the 

district court the full appellate filing fee of $505 within 30 days of the date of 

this order. The clerk of this court shall dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution if Bazan does not comply with this order. 

Case: 22-40549 Document: 00516603483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2023
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patch International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Stadnyk, President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

              /s/ David Stadnyk                                      

David Stadnyk

President, Secretary and Treasurer
No. 10-5195.

#### Tommy James Gagliano, Petitioner v. Stanley Mazur-Hart.

562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 567,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8697.

178 L. Ed. 2d 416,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.3 Banks Severance Amendment


Exhibit 10.3






AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR POST-TERMINATION BENEFITS






Gap Inc. and Michelle Banks entered into an Agreement For Post-Termination Benefits (“Agreement”), dated May 23, 2012, which provides eligibility for post-termination benefits in the event of certain terminations that occur prior to February 13, 2015.   By this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby extended to apply to certain terminations, as described in the Agreement, prior to February 13, 2018.  Except as provided in this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in effect.  




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Michelle Banks            Date: May 22, 2014          
Michelle Banks


THE GAP, INC.


/s/ Glenn Murphy            Date: June 4, 2014          
By:  Glenn Murphy
       Chairman and CEO
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Marilyn Welborn, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Educational Development Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s quarterlyperiod ended February 28, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 29, 2007/s/ Marilyn Welborn
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

OMOLABAKE OJOMO-BAKARE AND DELE BAKARE, INDIVIDUALLY 

### AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, BRITNEY BAKARE VERSUS BATON ROUGE COMMUNITY 

### COLLEGE, THE BATON ROUGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION, INC. AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY 

### NO. 2021 CW 1488



### JANUARY 31, 2022

In Re: The State of Louisiana, through the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana 

### Community and Technical Colleges, 

### applying 

### for supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 688629.

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court 

### judge sitting pro 

### tempore had the 

### authority to 

## review any interlocutory order she rendered 

## during the progress of this case under the broad powers 

## conferred byLa. Code Civ. P. art. 

### 1631. Prior to final 

### judgment, the 

### judge had the 

### discretion to change the substance or the result of an 

## interlocutory ruling she 

### found to 

### be erroneous and set 

### it aside without 

### any formal motion. See 

### Jackson v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 

### 2017-0830, ( La. 

## App. 1st Cir. 

### 9/21/18), 2018 WL 4562071, at * 

### 3 ( unpublished). The 

### district court' s November 5, 

### 2020 order granted a new trial and vacated the original 

### judgment that 

### denied defendant' s exceptions. Although the exceptions were reset 

## for hearing, when the matter came 

### before the district court on September 7, 

### 2021, the court 

## treated it as a hearing on amotion fornewtrial ratherthan a hearing onthe exceptions. 

## As a resultoftheprior rulingthat 

## vacated the initial ruling onthe exceptions, there is currently no ruling on defendant's exceptions. Accordingly, the September 

### 30, 

## 2021 judgment denying a newtrial is vacated. The matter is remanded to the 

### district court for consideration of the exceptions of No Cause of Action, 

## Insufficiency of Service of 

### Process, 

## andVagueness with Motion to Strike filed bydefendant, Baton RougeCommunityCollege. imm WIL EW



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# A4

# U4eL DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
# C_2015398EN.01000801.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/8

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2015 — Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Grazia Equity GmbH

(Case C-548/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of the word mark GRAZIA - Opposition by the proprietor of the international, Community and national word and figurative marks including the word element ‘GRAZIA’ - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(5) - Reputation))

(2015/C 398/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA (represented by: G. Dragotti, R. Valenti, S. Balice and E. Varese, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent) and Grazia Equity GmbH (represented by: M. Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

| 3. | Grazia Equity GmbH shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Grazia Equity GmbH shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert C. Morris

, * From the 29th District

Court of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C45034

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00199

- CV * July 23, 2015

Kenneth N. Tarlton

, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

t here is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ C. Stanley BaileyC. Stanley BaileyChief Executive Officer
Jim Wilkinson - Re: Fwd: Notice for web page 

The notice entitled ""110 Ozone Authority SIP" has been added to the Notices and Alerts section of the MDE homepage.

- Diana

>>> Mary Jane Rutkowski 11/14/2012 10:18 AM >>>

Hi Diana

Here is the corrected pdf. Sorry about that :-)

>>> Diana Alegre 11/14/2012 9:53 AM >>>

Hi MJ,

The link provided in the PDF Katy sent (attached) has an invalid link:

http://www.mde.state.md.us/Programs/AirPrograms/air_planning/index.asp  (this link is from the old website)

Should this be:

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Air/AirQualityPlanning/Pages/programs/airprograms/air_planning/index.aspx?

Thanks,

Diana

>>> Mary Jane Rutkowski 11/14/2012 9:30 AM >>>

Good Morning Diana

Brian has approved the Air Quality Planning page. We should be OK to post the link on the MDE page. Please deploy the 

page today, if possible. Once again, we are on a legal deadline :-) Let me know if you need anything. Thanks!!!

>>> Diana Alegre 11/13/2012 5:42 PM >>>

Hi Katy,

The link cited on the page does not exist. Please check and resend document.

As noted in emails last week, I will add this to the Notices and Alerts section of the MDE homepage as:

"110 Ozone Authority SIP".

Thanks,

Diana

>>> Kathleen Perry 11/13/2012 4:47 PM >>>

Hi Diana,

Would you be able to post the attached document on the main page under notices and alerts, and on the MDE 

calendar/hearings page? The title is:

Public Hearing on Implementation, Maintenance, and Enforcement Measures for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air

Quality Standard State Implementation Plan.

Thanks so much,

Katy

From: Diana Alegre

To: Rutkowski, Mary Jane

Date: 11/14/2012 12:05 PM

Subject: Re: Fwd: Notice for web page

CC: Hug, Brian;  Kappalman, Samantha;  Perry, Kathleen;  Sarros, Molla;  Thu...

file:///C:/Users/msarros/AppData/... Page 1 of 1 12/21/2012