alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA employee receives Canadian Meritorious Service Medal

/ Published Dec. 29, 2015
Washington, DC, **> *Col. Shearer, of the United States Army, was a true champion for Canada as Sustainment Enterprise Director and Chief of the Combined Joint Logistics Branch within Regional Command (South) Headquarters from May 2010 to June 2011.  Consistently employing our soldiers in key positions, he was crucial to the Canadian Contingent’s integration into the Headquarters and ensured Canada received essential support during a critical period of mission transition. Col. Shearer’s superb leadership was vital to operational success and helped preserve Canada’s legacy in Afghanistan.*
# Former Distribution leader inducted into DLA Hall of Fame 

/ Published Sept. 22, 2016
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch inducted former agency leader David Ennis into the DLA Hall of Fame Sept. 20 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.

Ennis, former deputy commander of DLA’s second largest distribution center, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, who has enjoyed notable success as a leader, mentor, friend, outstanding citizen and three-term Mayor of Escalon, Calif., was inducted alongside six other former leaders.

This special honor is reserved for former DLA team members whose enduring contributions and service have made a lasting impact on the agency. Each inductee received a medal and plaque at the ceremony and will be featured in a prominent display honoring the hall’s inductees.

For more information on the 2016 inductees and all other members of the DLA Hall of Fame, visit the new Hall of Fame homepage on dla.mil.
# C_2017006EN.01000601.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2016 — Debonair Trading Internacional Lda v Groupe Léa Nature SA, European Union Intellectual Property Office

a

(Case C-537/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) - Figurative mark including the word elements ‘SO’BiO ētic’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the EU and national word and figurative marks including the word element ‘SO...?’ - Refusal of registration))

(2017/C 006/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (represented by: D. Selden, Advocate, and T. Alkin, Barrister)

Appellant:

a

Other party to the proceedings: Groupe Léa Nature SA (represented by: S. Arnaud, avocat), European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and P. Geroulakos, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 23 September 2014, Groupe Léa Nature v OHIM — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO’BiO ētic) (T-341/13, not published, EU:T:2014:802); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 23 September 2014, Groupe Léa Nature v OHIM — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO’BiO ētic) (T-341/13, not published, EU:T:2014:802);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.04 MB)

Tags:historypage_director

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Viskase Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-10689 and
333-12829) of our report dated April 15, 1999 except as to the information
presented in Note 25, for which the date is June 15, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Viskase
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and December 25, 1997,
and for the periods December 26, 1997 to December 31, 1998, December 27, 1996 to
December 25, 1997 and December 29, 1995 to December 26, 1996, and our report
dated April 15, 1999 except for as to the information presented in Note 18, for
which the date is June 15, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Viskase Holding Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and December 25, 1997 and for the periods December 26, 1997 to December 31,
1998, December 27, 1996 to December 25, 1997 and December 29, 1995 to December
26, 1996, which reports are included in the annual report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Chicago, Illinois
June 15, 1999
# Old furniture gets new life as training aids for live fire training

/ Published June 7, 2016
Okinawa, Japan, 
Creative thinking by Marine instructors on Okinawa, Japan, allowed old government furniture to avoid the landfill and serve on in a live fire training area.

Rocky Chavana, a property disposal specialist and environmentalist at the DLA Disposition Services site at Okinawa, said the III Marine Expeditionary Force’s Expeditionary Operations Training Group requested scrap furniture to furnish their training area to replicate life like situations when breaching houses and occupied rooms.  He said the furniture that the Defense Logistics Agency provided included couches, chairs, tables and wardrobes. 

Marine Gunnery Sgt. David Beardsley, the group’s logistics chief, said the Marines who instruct for the group like to ensure students get the most realistic training as possible. 

“In order to do this our Special Missions Branch has to set up their shoot houses to realistic specifications that could occur during real life situations that Marines have to endure on their call to duty,” Beardsley said.  He added that they want their students to be able to take the skills they learned and pass them on to their units.

Beardsley said the use of live ammunition made furniture that would have been scrapped ideal for the training.

“We understand that it will get destroyed in the process, so why not use this furniture as a realistic training tool,” Beardsley said.  “We are thankful to have the option to utilize DLA in aiding our training.”

Beardsley said the furniture will play an important role in Close Quarter Tactics Training by making the training environment more realistic in the set up. He explained that showing how the items would appear in a possible real situation enhances the knowledge of the Marines going through the training.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      154
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   354
<PP&E>                                           1,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              450
<BONDS>                                          1,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           340
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,461
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   511
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3
<DISCONTINUED>                                      35
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013274EN.01000401.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 25 June 2013 — Minister Finansów v Oil Trading Poland sp. z o.o.

(Case C-349/13)

2013/C 274/07

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister Finansów

Applicant:

Defendant: Oil Trading Poland sp. z o.o.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 3(3) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (1) and correspondingly the current Article 1(3), point (a) of the first subparagraph and the [second] subparagraph, of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC (2) be interpreted as not precluding the imposition by a Member State of excise duty on lubricating oils falling within CN codes 2710 19 71 to 2710 19 99 used for purposes other than as motor fuels or heating fuels, in accordance with the rules relating to the harmonised excise duty imposed on the consumption of energy products?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2009 L 9, p. 12.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1127

DTEX LLC,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BBVA BANCOMER, S.A. INSTITUCION DE BANCA

MULTIPLE, GRUPO FINANCIERO,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (7:04-cv-02273-GRA)

Argued: November 29, 2006 Decided: January 17, 2007

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Kevin Augustus Dunlap, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN,

L.L.P., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank Langston

Eppes, EPPES & PLUMBLEE, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee. ON BRIEF: I. Faison Hicks, PARKER, POE, ADAMS &

BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Dtex, LLC (Plaintiff), a South Carolina Corporation,

brought the present civil action against defendant BBVA Bancomer,

S.A. (Defendant), a foreign financial institution headquartered in

Mexico, in the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina. Plaintiff’s action seeks damages under South

Carolina common law and treble damages under the Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-

1968. The gravamen of Plaintiff’s complaint is that Defendant

engaged in a course of criminal and corrupt practices to prevent

Plaintiff from obtaining possession of certain equipment that

Plaintiff had purchased in Mexico.

Of relevance on appeal, Defendant moved, pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), to dismiss Plaintiff’s state law

claims for lack of personal jurisdiction and moved, pursuant to

Rule 12(b)(6), to dismiss Plaintiff’s RICO claims for failure to

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After allowing

Plaintiff to amend its complaint and submit a RICO case statement,

which case statement the district court treated as further amending

the complaint, and after considering the legal memoranda submitted

and oral arguments presented by the parties, the district court

granted both motions in a comprehensive and exhaustive opinion.

Dtex, LLC v. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., 405 F. Supp. 2d 639 (D.S.C. Dec.

20, 2005). 
- 3 -

Having thoroughly reviewed the district court’s excellent

opinion and the parties’ briefs and submissions on appeal, and

having heard oral argument in this case, we conclude that the

district court did not err in granting Rule 12(b)(2) dismissal of

Plaintiff’s state law claims, nor did it err in granting Rule

12(b)(6) dismissal of Plaintiff’s RICO claims. We, therefore,

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dtex, LLC, 405 F.

Supp. 2d at 643-52.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                58383         119868
<SECURITIES>                         200000         200000
<RECEIVABLES>                       1799848        1630363
<ALLOWANCES>                       (1712000)      (1493000)
<INVENTORY>                          343068         341543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     577542         612713
<PP&E>                               197175         209260
<DEPRECIATION>                      (181762)       (174485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1028712        1216342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                491418         597301
<BONDS>                                   0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0              0
<PREFERRED>                               0              0
<COMMON>                              99051          99051
<OTHER-SE>                            (2328)         (2328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1028712        1216342
<SALES>                             1864500        1490282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1864500        1490282
<CGS>                                 22042         119994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2206666        2164964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   195409         204509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (338035)       (653564)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (31652)       (411240)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0              0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0              0
<CHANGES>                                 0              0
<NET-INCOME>                        (306383)       (242324)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.08)         (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.08)         (0.06)



</TABLE>
No. 10-7319.

#### Lionel Michael Miller, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1151, 131 S. Ct. 935,

178 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 361.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 42 So. 3d 204.
No. 10-6932.

#### Guadencio Cayetano-Camacho, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1050, 131 S. Ct. 612,

178 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8963.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*446Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 822.
No. 10-6499.

#### John Eley, Petitioner v. Mark Houk, Warden.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 822,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9668.

178 L. Ed. 2d 562,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 958.
No. 10-6338.

#### Saul Contreras, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 427,

178 L. Ed. 2d 333,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8169.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Same case below, 312 S.W.3d 566.
### RE: Revisions to Section III of SO2 preamble Laity, James A.

to: Lydia Wegman, Mancini, Dominic J.

06/02/2010 03:31 PM

Cc: James Hemby, Richard Wayland, Kevin McLean, Sara Schneeberg, Mike Thrift , Scott Jenkins, Tricia Crabtree, Charlotte Bertrand, Bridgid Curry, Lydia Wegman

Show Details

This language looks good to us.

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailt o:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 2:27 PM

To: Laity, James A.; Mancini, Dominic J.

Cc: Hemby.James@epamail.epa.gov; Wa yland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; Mclean.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov; schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov; thrift.mike@epam ail.epa.gov; Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; crabtree.tricia@epa.gov; Bertrand.C harlotte@epamail.epa.gov; Curry.Bridgi d@epamail.epa.gov; Lydia Wegman Subject: Revisions to Section III of SO2 preamble

Jim and Dom,

A ttached is a redline/strikeout version of section III of th e preamble that includes the language we agreed to this morning: two additions at the end of the document and an added footnote on page 7. We have also incorporated
Jim's comments from last week cons istent with our agreement to take public comment on the modeling and implementation guidance. Please let us k now if you have any questions. Thanks. 

### Page 1 of 1

6/2/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\tcrabtre\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web1584.htm
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Jeffrey A.Kupp, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inet Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the aforementioned Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Jeffrey  A. Kupp                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                        |
| July 21,  2004                              |

 

----
# DSCC plants saplings at MWR Sports Park

/ Published July 22, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus Installation Management Team planted 50 tree saplings at the DSCC MWR Sports Park this summer. The saplings were donated through an Urban Tree Project partnership in consult with the City of Columbus and the Urban Tree Master Plan Project to identify sites for potential tree plantings and expand the city’s existing tree canopy.

The donated saplings were native hardy species selected for the site’s conditions including silver maple, honey locust, white pine, swamp white oak, hackberry, walnut and boxelder varieties. They will provide much needed shade and beautification as they mature and serve as a wind break for nearby structures.  

The DSCC environmental team said using seven species will create diversification to prevent the plantings from being wiped out by future disease or pests. Diversification also allows the plantings to serve as an ecosystem that can support more beneficial insects and birds.  The saplings were planted in groups of three to be not only aesthetically pleasing but to increase survival rates. 

The non-profit Urban Tree Project along with DSCC Facilities personnel will continue to watch over the saplings for one year, after which they should thrive on their own. DSCC hopes to continue to partner with Urban Tree Project on future projects.
Sample of EPA NSR Lawsuits and Targeted Projects

Air Heaters

o Sierra Club v. Dairyland Power Coop. (filed in 2010)

o NOVs issued to American Municipal Power & Painesville Municipal Elec. Plant 

(2009)

Steam Turbine Upgrade

o Conservation Law Found. v. Public Service of New. Hamp. (filed in 2011)

o United States v. Ameren (filed in 2011)

o U.S. v. AEP, U.S. v. Cinergy , U.S. v. Duke Energy (filed in 1999)

o Mississippi Power Company 114 Letter

Boiler Feed Pumps

o New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (filed in 2005)

o NOV issued to Nebraska Public Power District (2008)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Devernon Kelly, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 344]

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), imposed January 23, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal his sentence cannot be considered knowing, voluntary, and intelligent *(see People v Williams,*258 AD2d 544 [1999]). Accordingly, we have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive, but find it to be without merit *(see People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.