alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain benefits paid 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mrs. MCBATH (for herself and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain 

benefits paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring American 

5 Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘HAVEN 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME. 

8 Section 101(10A) of title 11, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 

10 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2938 IH

1 ‘‘(B)(i) includes any amount paid by any 

2 entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case 

3 the debtor and the debtor’s spouse), on a reg4 ular basis for the household expenses of the 

5 debtor or the debtor’s dependents (and in a 

6 joint case the debtor’s spouse if not otherwise 

7 a dependent); and 

8 ‘‘(ii) excludes— 

9 ‘‘(I) benefits received under the Social 

10 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); 

11 ‘‘(II) payments to victims of war 

12 crimes or crimes against humanity on ac13 count of their status as victims of such 

14 crimes; 

15 ‘‘(III) payments to victims of inter16 national terrorism or domestic terrorism, 

17 as those terms are defined in section 2331 

18 of title 18, on account of their status as 

19 victims of such terrorism; and 

20 ‘‘(IV) any monthly compensation, pen21 sion, pay, annuity, or allowance paid under 

22 title 10, 37, or 38 in connection with a dis23 ability, combat-related injury or disability, 

24 or death of a member of the uniformed 

25 services, except that any retired pay exVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:14 Jun 07, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2938.IH H2938

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2938 IH

1 cluded under this subclause shall include 

2 retired pay paid under chapter 61 of title 

3 10 only to the extent that such retired pay 

4 exceeds the amount of retired pay to which 

5 the debtor would otherwise be entitled if 

6 retired under any provision of title 10 

7 other than chapter 61 of that title.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc..

                                        By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER G. KENBER
                                            -----------------------------------
                                        Name: Christopher G. Kenber
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT (10)(e)  SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY
2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN  The Empire District Electric Company 2006
Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended in the following respects:  1.Section 21
is amended to read in its entirety as follows:  The Company
shall be entitled to withhold the amount of withholding tax payable with
respect to any Awards and Share deliveries in lieu of cash payments and to sell
such number of Shares as may be necessary to produce the amount so required to
be withheld, unless the recipient supplies to the Company cash in the amount
requested by the Company for the purpose. 
The person entitled to receive Shares pursuant to the Award will be
given notice as far in advance as practicable to permit such cash payment to be
made to the Company.  The Company may, in
lieu of sale of Shares, defer making delivery of Shares until indemnified to
its satisfaction with respect to any such withholding tax.  The Committee may adopt rules allowing
the recipient of any Award payable in Shares, or any person electing to receive
Shares under Section 19, to satisfy any applicable tax withholding
requirements in whole or in part by delivering to the Company Shares or by
instructing the Company to withhold Shares otherwise deliverable to such person
as part of such Award.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
executed this Amendment on the 24th day of July, 2008.  THE EMPIRE
  DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANYBy:
  /s/ William L. GipsonTitle:
  President & CEO  ATTEST   By:
  /s/ Janet S. WatsonTitle:
  Secretary-Treasurer
EXHIBIT (31)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gregory A. Knapp, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Empire District Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
February 20, 2009

|    |  |                     
|--- |  | --------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Gregory A. Knapp

|       |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Name:  |  | Gregory A. Knapp                                    
|Title: |  | Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-7429.

#### Norberto Quinones, aka Jose Rosado, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 840,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9809,

178 L. Ed. 2d 571,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 349.
# Solicitation SPE4A2-15-R-0002

# Packaged Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricants (Chem/POL)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17088]



[[Page 34901]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[Announcement 98037]


Initiatives by Organizations To Strengthen National Tobacco 
Control Activities in the United States; Notice of Availability of 
Funds for Fiscal Year 1998; Second Amendment

    A notice announcing the availability of Fiscal Year 1998 funds for 
cooperative agreements for Initiatives by Organizations to Strengthen 
National Tobacco Control Activities in the United States was published 
in the Federal Register on April 23, 1998 [63 FR 20197]. The notice is 
amended as follows:
    On page 20197, first paragraph, under the heading ``Introduction,'' 
the seventh line of the paragraph is amended to read:populations; 
African-Americans, Native Americans, * * *. On page 20198, second 
paragraph under the heading ``Availability of Funds,'' the fourth line 
is amended to read: African Americans, Native Americans, * * *.
    All other information and requirements of the April 23, 1998, 
Federal Register notice remain the same.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Joseph R. Carter,
Acting Associate Director for Management and Operations, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-17088 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-66-000]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Report of GRI Refunds

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 26, 1998, Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave) 
submitted its Report of Gas Research Institute (GRI) Refunds for 1997 
pursuant to Subpart F of Part 154 of the Commission's Regulations and 
ordering paragraph (C) of the Commission's order issued on February 22, 
1995 at Docket No. RP95-124-000.
    On May 29, 1998, Mojave received a refund from GRI for 
overcollections for the calendar year 1997 in the amount of 
$204,730.00. on June 11, 1998, Mojave states that it refunded its 
eligible firm shippers as required by the February 22, 1995 order by 
crediting each shipper's applicable transportation invoice.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 7, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17893 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersignedofficer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
| Date:  August 8, 2007 |                                                                 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | /s/ Thomas E. D’Ambra                                           |   |
|                  | Name: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.                                  |
|                  | Title: Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2814 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to authorize the basic allowance 

for housing for members of the uniformed services in the Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to authorize the 

basic allowance for housing for members of the uniformed services in the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR 

4 HOUSING TO MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED 

5 SERVICES IN THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 403(b) of title 37, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND THE VIR9 GIN ISLANDS’’ after ‘‘THE UNITED STATES’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2814 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and the Vir2 gin Islands’’ after ‘‘the United States’’; and 

3 (3) in paragraphs (2), (3)(A), and (6), by in4 serting ‘‘or the Virgin Islands’’ after ‘‘the United 

5 States’’ each place it appears. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 403(c) of 

7 title 37, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘OR THE VIR9 GIN ISLANDS’’ after ‘‘THE UNITED STATES’’; and 

10 (2) in paragraphs (1), (2), (3)(A)(i), and 

11 (3)(B), by inserting ‘‘or the Virgin Islands’’ after 

12 ‘‘the United States’’ each place it appears. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

15 of this Act and shall apply to payments under section 403 

16 of title 37, United States Code, beginning on January 1, 

17 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-6883.

#### Monty Marcellus Shelton, Petitioner v. John B. Fox, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 802,

178 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9581.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Olmsted, Petitioner,*

No. 91826-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45260-0-II, May 5, 2015 5,2015,187 187 Wn. App. 1023. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-179-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# C_2013147EN.01002902.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/29

---

Action brought on 5 April 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-191/13)

2013/C 147/53

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul notice of open competition EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6), in the buildings sector, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul notice of open competition EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6), in the buildings sector, and

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those raised in Case T-148/13 Kingdom of Spain v Commission.

Kingdom of Spain

Commission

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 34 8 . J ONATHAN ROOKS v . THE STATE.

A ju ry fo un d J o n at h an Ro o k s g u i l t y o f t wo co un t s o f fi rs t d eg ree cru el t y to

ch i l d ren

. Ro o k s fi l ed a m ot io n fo r new t ri al

, w h i ch was s ub s eq u en t l y am en d ed

. 1 Th e

t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n o n J u n e 2 7

, 2 0 19

, an d Ro ok s fi l ed a n o t i ce of ap p eal o n

Au g u s t 9 , 2 0 1 9 . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed w i t hi n 3 0 d ay s of en t ry o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t to

b e ap p eal ed . OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t ice o f ap p eal

i s an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4

Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Becau s e Ro ok fi l ed h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal 4 3

d a y s a ft er en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, h i s ap p eal i s u n ti m el y , an d i t i s h e r e b y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Ro o ks was i n i ti al l y rep res en t ed b y co u ns el b el o w, b u t h e was g ra n t ed

p erm i s s i o n t o rep res en t h im s el f, an d h e fi l ed am en d ed m o t i o n s fo r n ew t ri al p ro s e. October 01, 2019

10/01/2019
No. 10-7718.

#### Stephen G. Conklin, Petitioner v. EMC Mortgage Corporation.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1053,

178 L. Ed. 2d 872,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 969,

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office, denied.

Same case below, 984 A.2d 1027.
# C_2015073EN.01000801.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV

(Case C-30/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 96/9/EC - Legal protection of databases - Database not protected by copyright or the sui generis right - Contractual limitation on the rights of users of the database)

(2015/C 073/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd

Defendant: PR Aviation BV

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be interpreted as meaning that it is not applicable to a database which is not protected either by copyright or by the sui generis right under that directive, so that Articles 6(1), 8 and 15 of that directive do not preclude the author of such a database from laying down contractual limitations on its use by third parties, without prejudice to the applicable national law.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

---
From: George Tsiolis [mailto:gtsiolis@nj.rr.com] 

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:39 PM

To: Withey, Charlotte

Cc: 'Giff, Jennifer'

Subject: FW: Arizona RHR FIP - Tribal Consultation Between EPA, SRPMIC and PCC

Dear Charlotte,

Happy New Year to you too!

In response to your e-mail inquiry yesterday and following up on our December 

20-21, 2013 e-mail discussion, attached please find Community services budget 

information for fiscal year 2014. The prevailing trend is that these services 

budgets average about a 3% increase annually. The requirement to install 

SNCR at PCC by 2018 would have a significant impact on these services 

budgets and presently there is no contingency to account for such an impact. As 

you know from my December 20 e-mail SRPMIC-PCC believes there is legal 

flexibility for the EPA to propose a FIP that requires PCC to install SNCR later 

than 2018 and we did not discern in your December 21 e-mail necessarily a 

contrary position. Accordingly the Community respectfully requests that the EPA 

in the FIP rulemaking propose that the numeric emissions limit and any other 

standards reflective of the installation of SNCR at PCC not take effect earlier 

than 2022-2023. Also please consider that a more definitive statement from the 

EPA that it has the legal flexibility to propose a compliance timeframe later than 

December 31, 2018 would make it more likely that the Community would feel the 

potential benefits of submitting additional financial information to inform the 

rulemaking would outweigh the sensitivities to doing so that I described in my 

December 20 e-mail. In response to your December 21 analysis, we would 

suggest the EPA’s flexibility to propose a compliance timeframe later than 

December 31, 2018 is found at 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1)(i)(B), which requires the 

reasonable progress goals to be based also on consideration of the “uniform rate 

of improvement in visibility and the emission reduction measures needed to 

achieve it for the period covered by the implementation plan” (my emphasis).

Alternatively SRPMIC-PCC would welcome the opportunity to review any 

determination that the EPA has made that achievement of a 1.8 lbs/ton NOX 

emissions rate at PCC by December 31, 2018 (and no later) is needed to 

achieve reasonable progress, relative in material part to the uniform rate of 

improvement, as indicated by 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1)(i)(B).

Once again, SRPMIC-PCC thanks you for the EPA’s efforts in the tribal 

consultation regarding the proposed FIP.

Best regards,
George A. Tsiolis

Counsel to SRPMIC-PCC

George A. Tsiolis

Attorney at Law

351 Lydecker Street

Englewood, New Jersey 07631

Cell: 602-319-4021

Office: 201-408-4256

Fax: 201-408-4622

Email: gtsiolis@nj.rr.com

Web: www.gtsiolis.com
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
      of reference of our report dated August 17, 1998, included and
      incorporated by reference in Elcor Corporation's Form 10-K for the year
      ended June 30, 1998, into Elcor Corporation's previously filed
      Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 2087437) and For S-3 (File
      No. 2-87436).




                                                     /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                     -----------------------
                                                         Arthur Andersen LLP



      Dallas, Texas
      September 28, 1998