alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nathan Harrison,
      M.D., CEO, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
      24,
      2006











/s/
      Donald Tucker


CEO/President/Principal
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiger Telematics,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form [10-Q] for the period  ending  September  30 , 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  officer of the
Company hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  that  based on their  knowledge  and
belief:  1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of  operations  of the Company as of and for the periods  covered in
the Report.



S/ Michael W. Carrender
----------------------------------------------
Michael W, Carrender,  Chief Executive Officer



S/ Michael W. Carrender
----------------------------------------------
Michael W. Carrender, Chief Financial Officer



April 23, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48730-48731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19563]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

[Docket ID: DoD-2014-OS-0118]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 2, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Licari, 571-372-0493.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Taxes Assessed by the 
Government of Afghanistan; OMB Control Number 0704-XXXX.
    Type of Request: Emergency: New Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 192.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 192.
    Average Burden per Response: 4 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 768.
    Needs and Uses: Section 1216 of NDAA 2014 authorizes the Secretary 
of Defense to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan 
in the amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by 
Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket

[[Page 48731]]

number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy 
for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to 
make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at 
http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: August 13, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-19563 Filed 8-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
No. 09-11037.

#### William Lee Brothers, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 981,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 114.

178 L. Ed. 2d 809,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*810Former decision, 562 U.S. 860, 131 S. Ct. 133, 178 L. Ed. 2d 81, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6342.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Summary of
Compensation for Non-Management Members of the Board of Directors


of The Timberland
Company, as approved on December 2, 2004.


 


Annual Cash
Retainer:  $30,000


 


Lead Director Annual Cash
Retainer:  $15,000


 


Committee Chair Annual
Cash Retainer:  $7,500


 


Attended Board Meeting
Cash Fee:  $2,000


 


Attended Committee
Meeting Cash Fee:  $1,000
p. 1



# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 230 ) IV-E-104 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM

Sheet 230 of 242_ _ _, . P. 2 

## IV-E-lo f

~ \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y yVWc-u * AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5
OFFIC E O F

AI R ANO RADIATION 

## JUL ) k

## 1993 ru i
MEMORANDU M
SUBJECT : Discussio n Wit hNRD C Regardin g Onboar d NPR M FROM : Glen n W . Passavant , Chie f ^3^KX Au J /2\MA**£^ " Specia l Regulator yProject s Branc h TO : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 O n Jul y9 , 199 3 I returne d a phon e cal l fro mDebora hSheima n o f th e Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l regardin g onboar d vapo r recovery . Specifically , sh e ha d severa l question s regardin g th e notic e publishe d i n th e Federa l Registe r o n Ma y27 , 1993 . W e discusse d he r question s i n th e area s o f mode l yea r o f implementatio n an d applicabilit yo f th e onboar d requiremen t t o light-dut ytrucks , heavy-dut yvehicles , othe r fuels , an d Californi a vehicles
. Wit hregar d t o light-dut ytruck s an d heavy-dut yvehicle s I provide d he r a cop yo f th e Decembe r 198 8 EP Aanalysi s alread yi n th e docke t (IV-B-19 ) pertainin g t o cost s an d th e attache d informatio n abou t refuelin g emissio n rate s an d percen t contributio n b yth e variou s vehicle s subclasses . Attachment s

## M4. 1 FC M O NROA D F E ESTIMATE S AN D EFFEC T O F ONBOAR D REFUELIN G EMISSION S
VEHICL E CLAS S

LD V LDT 1 LDT 2 Al lLD T 2BHD V Othe r HD V Al lHD V FUE L

ECONOM Y

23.1 1 (19.37 ) (15.49 ) 17.5 2 (10.59 ) (6.04 ) 9. 7 REGISTRATION S X10 6



### 123.00 8 (23.601 ) (21.062 ) 44.06 3 (5.229 ) (1.27 ) 6.49 9 PERCEN T

REGISTRATIO N

7 1 (13 ) (12 ) 2 5 (3 ) (0.7 ) 3. 7 EMISSION S

RAT E(a/Mi )

.2 3 .2 8 .3 5 .3 0 .5 1 .8 9 .5 6 PERCEN T

EMISSIONS

6 3 (14.6 ) (16.4 ) 3 1 (5 ) (1 ) 6 ( ) = intermediat edat a

## EMISSIO NFACTO RANALYSI S

Flee t Composit e0.2 6 e/mil e= 5. 4 s/sal 20.6 8 g/m i

LD V LDT 1 LD T2 Al l LD T 2BHD V Othe r HD V Al l HD V CONTRIBUTIO NT O COMPOSIT EE F .1 6 g/mi .03 8 g/mi .04 2 g/mi .0 8 g/mi .01 3 g/m i .00 3 g/m i .01 6 g/m i

E Fnumbe r

doe s no t includ eth e0.9 5 facto r

t o accoun t

for th estandar dleve lan din-use
. PERCEN T 6 3 14. 6 16. 4 3 1 5

' 1 \ 

### 6
# Division chief overcomes fire with faith, support from co-workers 

/ Published May 24, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, *This story is part of a series highlighting the resilience of DLA Troop Support's workforce.*the DLA resilience model
P. I


# OAR Box 1500 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 4 ) ll-C-3 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/5/2008 1:45:55PM

Sheet 4 of 343^ £0S % P. 2 

### A-94-52 . X-C-J D

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENCY

RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK. N C 2771 1 

### AP R 1 01996 OFFIC E O F AI R QUAUTYPLANNIN G AN O STANDARD S



### Mr . Joh nSchweitze r Composite s Institut e 144 1 Whit eStree t An nArbor , Michiga n4810 4 l3^«rti^V^J^®»&*Frr\e-,. i 

# RM.H I L i fWEPAAIRCKXKg T^
Dea r John : Than k yo u fo r summarizin g you r concern s regardin g the maximumachievabl e contro l technology(MACT ) floo r determination s fo r th e reinforce d plasti c composite s sourc e categoryi n you r Apri l 1 , 199 6 facsimile . W e ar e looking forward t o meetin g wit h yo u o n Apri l 26 , 199 6 t o ge t you r specifi c idea s o n ho wt o resolv e som e o f thes e issue s a s w e hav e bee n awar e o f themfo r some time , bu t hav e no t found a n acceptabl e solution . W e understand tha t yo u ar e concerne d with : (1 ) subcategorizatio n tha t ha s resulte d i n MAC T floor s fo r some processe s tha t ar e base d o n abatemen t technologies , (2 ) th e cos t o f abatemen t technologies , and (3 ) determining MAC T floor s base d o n subcategorie s tha t d o no t accoun t fo r certai n factor s specifi c t o facilitie s i n th e subcategory . W e woul d lik e t o wor k wit hyo u concerning thes e issue s and woul d appreciat e specifi c suggestion s fro myo u a s ho wt o resolv e themwithi n th e lega l framewor k o f Sectio n 11 2 o f th e Clea n Ai r Act . A s yo u know , w e hav e spen t considerabl e effor t developin g subcategorie s an

d calculatin g floors , an d hav e requeste d inpu tP. 3

fromthe industryo n this . Whe n w e mee t wit hyo u o n Apri l 26 , 1996 , w e hop e yo u wil l discus s you r option s fo r addressin g th e issues . Than k yo u and w e loo k forwar d t o seeing yo u then . Sincerely , 

### Vfc* 7 Bruc e C / Jorda n Directo r Emissio n Standard s Divisio n
# C_2013344EN.01006202.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/62

---

Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU)

(Case T-498/13)

2013/C 344/115

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vincci Hoteles, SA (Alcobendas, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 611/2012-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 611/2012-1; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘NAMMU’ for gods and services in Classes 3, 32 and 44 — Community trade mark registration No 5 238 704

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The application was based on Article 8(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for invalidity in its entirety

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 57 (2) and (3) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
SPE4A2-15-R-0002

ATTACHMENT #9 

Chem/POL Follow-on Effort

NOTE TO OFFERORS: Past performance information concerning critical 

subcontractors and/or joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without 

the critical subcontractor's or joint venture partner's consent. Because a prime contractor 

is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing critical 

subcontractor/joint venture partner past and present performance information to the prime 

during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government's Past Performance Team in 

assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following 

consent form be completed by the critical subcontractors/joint venture partners 

identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part 

of your Past Performance Volume. 

 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTOR/JOINT VENTURE PARTNER CONSENT FORM FOR 

THE RELEASE OF PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE 

PRIME CONTRACTOR

Dear (Contracting Officer)

We are currently participating as a (critical subcontractor/joint venture partner) with 

(prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Defense 

Logistics Agency Aviation (DLA Aviation) request for Proposal (SPE4A2-15-R-0002) 

for the Chemicals, Packaged Petroleum, Oils and Lubricants (Chem/POL) follow-on 

effort.

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance 

in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance 

confidence assessment process we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss 

our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source 

selection process.

________________________

________________________

(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the 

company)

Company Name:

Address:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc. (the Company) certify that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  November 14, 2006 /s/ Yu Hong Tu Yu Hong Tu (Chief Executive Officer)  November 14, 2006 /s/ Wang Lei Wang Lei (Chief Financial Officer)
Order filed, December 18, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00526-CV

____________

SUSANA I. VILLALPANDO, Appellant

V.

ARMANDO VILLALPANDO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-30887

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 06, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On October 08, 2014, this court granted the court reporters motion 

for extension of time to file the record until November 05, 2014. On November 

12, 2014, this court granted the court reporter’s second motion for extension of 

time to file the record until December 11, 2014. The record has not been filed with 
the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the 

following order.

We order Eunice Tillman, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be 

entertained. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that 

the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Eunice 

Tillman does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing 

the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the 

record.

PER CURIAM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131172 & (20) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ARCHIE SHARP, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131172 

 COA: 266380 

Montcalm CC: 04-003381-AH 

MONTCALM COUNTY JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

remand is DENIED. 

t0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
Order entered May 13, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00242

- CV

KEITH HARRELL , Appellant

V.

JARED S. SMITH, ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 219th Jud icial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 06220

- 2021

O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ May 12, 2022 unopposed motion for an

extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time

to June 2, 2022

.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

 Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-7057

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-2957, Judge William A. Moorman.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

 

O R D E R

Harold W. Van Allen moves for an extension of time, 

until August 15, 2013, to pay the filing fee or submit a 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 13-7057 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2013
2 HAROLD VAN ALLEN v. SHINSEKI

The motion is granted to the extent that the filing fee 

or a “Motion and Declaration for leave to Proceed in 

Forma Pauperis” is due August 15, 2013. No further 

extensions should be anticipated. If the filing fee is not 

paid or the in Forma Pauperis motion is not filed by 

August 15, 2013, the motion to reinstate the appeal filed 

on May 13, 2013 will be denied.

 

 

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel O’Toole

Clerk

s21 

 

Case: 13-7057 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 08/05/2013
DLA Aviation’s Chemicals and Petroleum Products (Class IIIP) Support

Program 

(This program does NOT include Class 1 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)!!! –

Continue to use established ODS Program procedures and Points of Contact) 

DLA Aviation awarded a chemical and petroleum products support contract to Science 

Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to manage the supply, storage, and 

distribution of chemicals and petroleum products to Military and Federal activities in the 

Continental United States (CONUS) and to replenish DoD wholesale stock levels at 

DLA’s OCONUS depots. The Chemicals and Petroleum Products (Class IIIP) Support 

Program includes: 

• Continued use of Service/Government agency automated ordering systems using

MILSTRIP/FEDSTRIP (Standard Form 344) or shop online through DoD E-Mall.

• SDSs and the value added information associated with them will continue to be

available to registered customers of the DoD HMIRS on-line at:

http://www.dla.mil/HQ/InformationOperations/Offers/Products/LogisticsApplications/

HMIRS.aspx

• DLA Aviation will continue to operate the QSL. SAIC will provide test reports to DLA

Aviation and in turn, DLA Aviation will populate the QSL.

• There are no customer returns of excess inventory authorized under this program (FTEs

will not be accepted). Customers should dispose of, reutilize or redistribute excess

inventory locally.

POC: For additional information call the Chemical and Petroleum Administrative

Contracting Officer, at (804) 279-4570 (DSN: 695).
Exhibit 10.11Schedule to Exhibit 10.9Non-Competition and Confidentiality Agreements which were substantially identical to that filed asExhibit 10.9 were entered into among either Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. or Duquesne Light Companyand each of the following parties, materially differing as set forth below:     Party and Date Executed Material Differences  Mark E. Kaplan, August 30, 2005 Restriction on competition covers areawithin a 150-mile radius of Pittsburgh,PA.         Restriction on competition coverstelecommunications in addition toelectricity.       Stevan R. Schott, August 9, 1999 Consideration includes severance of oneweek per each year of service, minimum of6 months and maximum of 12 months.         Restriction on competition covers thestates of Pennsylvania, Ohio, WestVirginia, Maryland, New York, New Jerseyand Virginia.         Restriction on competition covers gas inaddition to electricity.       James E. Wilson, August 17, 2000 Consideration includes severance of 52weeks of base salary and health andwelfare benefits. Pension benefits areto accrue during severance period (aspermitted by law).
No. 10-7894.

#### Marcus Floyd Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1190, 131 S. Ct. 1024,

178 L. Ed. 2d 847,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 738.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 474.