alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date: May 10, 2011
/s/ Mark T. FrostName: Mark T. FrostTitle: Senior Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer and

Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17423]



[[Page 35920]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-606-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 25, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 11, 1998, as supplemented on June 18, 
1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (Applicant), 600 Travis Street, 
P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed in Docket No. CP98-606-
000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.208(a)(2) and 
157.211(a)(2) of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.208, and 157.211) for approval to acquire the 
facilities of Five Flags Pipeline Company (Five Flags), construct two 
interconnections, and authorize the use of five existing delivery 
points in jurisdictional service, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request which 
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Applicant proposes to acquire from Five Flags approximately 41 
miles of ten-inch and 15 miles of eight-inch pipeline located in Santa 
Rosa and Escambia Counties, Florida. Applicant states that the 
acquisition will not include any compression facilities, because there 
is none on the Five Flags system. Applicant further proposes to 
construct and operate two interconnections between the existing 
facilities of Five Flags and Applicant. It is asserted that once 
connected, these facilities will serve as interconnections between the 
systems of Applicant and Florida Gas Transmission, another interstate 
pipeline. Finally, Applicant proposes to operate five existing delivery 
points on the Five Flags system as jurisdictional delivery points.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17423 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7638.

#### Charles W. McGee, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 955,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 91.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 1287.
# C_2015279EN.01001701.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union

(Case C-535/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against the Republic of Belarus - Admissibility - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Legal aid - Suspensory effect - Effective judicial protection - Rights of the defence - Principle of proportionality))

(2015/C 279/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Vadzim Ipatau (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Vadzim Ipatau to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Vadzim Ipatau to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

---
No. 10-602.

#### Edward J. Deegan, et ux., Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1138, 131 S. Ct. 937,

178 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 532.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 1301.
No. 10-7007.

#### Augustus H. Evans, Jr., Petitioner v. Thomas Lee.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 913,

178 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 489,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.

Same case below, 996 A.2d 793.
2 Thửnghiệm 3 Chữa trị

1 Suy nghĩ Liệu tôi có nguy cơ bị nhiễm Lao Phổi?

Thử Nghiệm và Chữa Trị Bệnh Lao Phổi Không Hoạt Động

Gần 13 triệu người tại Hoa Kỳ có thể đã nhiễm Lao Phổi không hoạt động (hay còn gọi là Nhiễm Lao tiềm ẩn).

Nếu không được chữa trị, 1 trong 10 người nhiễm Lao Phổi không hoạt động sẽ chuyển thành bệnh Lao Phổi,

trở bệnh, và có khả năng truyền bệnh Lao Phổi cho người khác qua đường không khí.

Quý vị có thể chung tay ngăn chăn sự lây lan của bệnh Lao Phổi.

Hãy trao đổi với bác sĩ về thử nghiệm nếu quý vị:

làm việc tại những nơi có nguy cơ lây nhiễm lao phổi cao,

như nhà cho người vô gia cư, trung tâm cải huấn,

và nhà dưỡng lão

đang hoặc đã sống trong các khu tập thể nơi

bệnh lao phổi thường xuyên xảy ra, ví dụ như

nhà cho người vô gia cư, hoặc nhà tù

có hệ miễn dịch yếu vì một

số loại thuốc hoặc các

bệnh nhất định, như bệnh

tiểu đường, ung thư, và HIV

gần đây có tiếp xúc với 

người nhiễm bệnh lao phổi

sinh ra hoặc thường xuyên 

đi đến các quốc gia có nhiều 

người mắc bệnh lao phổi, 

gồm có các quốc gia tại Á Châu, 

Phi Châu, và Mỹ La-tinh

Hiện có những phương 

pháp chữa trị nào?

Tôi cần được thử nghiệm 

lao phổi bằng cách nào?

Chữa trị Lao Phổi không hoạt động là cách tốt nhất 

để quý vị bảo vệ bản thân khỏi tiến triển sang bệnh 

Lao Phổi. Nếu có thể, CDC khuyến khích sử dụng 

các phương pháp điều trị có thời gian ngắn và 

thuận tiện trong 3 hoặc 4 tháng, sử dụng thuốc 

rifamycin để điều trị Lao Phổi không hoạt động.

Hiện có 2 loại thử nghiệm để kiểm tra 

nhiễm khuẩn lao: qua máu và qua da. 

Thử nghiệm qua máu được khuyên 

dùng cho người đã tiêm vắc-xin ngừa 

bệnh lao phổi (vắc-xin BCG). Hãy tham khảo với 

bác sĩ để chọn loại thử nghiệm phù hợp nhất với quý vị.

Cho dù quý vị đã tiêm vắc-xin ngừa bệnh Lao Phổi, còn gọi

là vắc-xin BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin), quý vị vẫn nên

thử nghiệm vì vắc-xin sẽ giảm tác dụng theo thời gian. 

Để tìm hiểu thêm về bệnh Lao Phổi và cách để bảo vệ bản thân và người khác,

xin vào www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb
#### *State, Respondent, v. Rodriquez, Petitioner,*

No. 91794-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71341-8-1, June 1, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 922. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
No. 10-6488.

#### Corey L. Hines, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 434,

178 L. Ed. 2d 337,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8173.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|Date: April 29, 2005 |  | By:  /s/ Christopher G. Kenber
 
Name:  Christopher G. KenberTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:

1. This annual
report on Form 10-K of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.



/s/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer


Date: March 30, 2006
# C_2013079EN.01002902.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/29

---

Action brought on 21 January 2013 — Erreà Sport v OHIM — Facchinelli (ANTONIO BACIONE)

(Case T-36/13)

2013/C 79/50

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erreà Sport SpA (Torrile, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Fucci, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antonio Facchinelli (Dalang, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 October 2012 in Case R 1561/2011-1 and, consequently, reject the application for registration published in Community Trade Marks Bulletin No 117/2010, lodged by Antonio Facchinelli, in respect of all the goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 October 2012 in Case R 1561/2011-1 and, consequently, reject the application for registration published in Community Trade Marks Bulletin No 117/2010, lodged by Antonio Facchinelli, in respect of all the goods;

Community Trade Marks Bulletin

| — | order that the costs incurred by Erreà Sport S.p.A in the present proceedings be reimbursed. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs incurred by Erreà Sport S.p.A in the present proceedings be reimbursed.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Antonio Facchinelli

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ANTONIO BACIONE’, for goods in Classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 9 056 037

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘erreà’ and figurative mark containing two intersecting rhombuses, for goods in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 35 and 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
#### *In re Det. of Breedlove, Petitioner,*

No. 92035-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70750-7-I, May 18, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1029. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
                         AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.


The following constitute all of the Registrant's subsidiary corporations:

1. EMCEE Cellular Inc., a Delaware corporation;

2. EMCEE Export Sales Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (this corporation is
a wholly owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);

3.R.F. Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (this corporation is a wholly owned
subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);

4.R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (this corporation is a
wholly owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);

5.Universal Rapid Access, LLC (this limited liability company is a partially
owned subsidiary of R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., which owns 16.14% of the
outstanding equity of the limited liability
company);

6. EMCEE Broadcast Products (Chengdu) Company, Ltd. (the Registrant owns 25% of
the issued and outstanding capital stock of this corporation);

7. Grand Forks Wireless, L.L.C. (this limited liability company is a partially
owned subsidiary of R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., which owns 50% of the
outstanding equity of the limited liability company); and

8. Advanced Broadcast Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (this corporation is
a wholly owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.).
SPOT TITLE: Elizabeth B. & Stephen B. Vignette

LENGTH: 1:31

AD-ID: VCDC1418000

AS-RECORDED SCRIPT:

ART CARD: LASTING CONSEQUENCES

 A Former Smoker’s Story

Super: Elizabeth B. and her husband Stephen B.

 Texas

We see Elizabeth and Stephen sitting in armchairs next to each other talking to camera in a living room. 

Elizabeth is wearing a grey cardigan and pink blouse and Stephen is wearing a blue button up shirt.

ELIZABETH: I’d notice that when I would walk my legs would seize up real bad and my feet would go 

numb.

Cut to a close up of Elizabeth talking to camera. 

ELIZABETH: I can't even go a half a block without having to stop...

Cut back to Elizabeth & Stephen sitting in armchairs talking to camera.

ELIZABETH: ...so I made an appointment with his doctor.

We see Stephen chopping food in the kitchen. Elizabeth walks by and get something by the sink.

ELIZABETH: I could immediately tell something was wrong and he said well I think you have something 

called peripheral artery disease

Cut to Elizabeth talking to camera sitting in an armchair.

ELIZABETH: ...it's common for smokers. They said that my aorta was 98% blocked and my femoral 

arteries were blocked and that I had to have surgery immediately.

Cut to images of Elizabeth in the hospital following surgery, we see her lying in bed with many tubs 

connected and a fresh scar.

STEPHEN: The severity of the surgery itself was really pretty scary...

Cut to Elizabeth and Stephen sitting in armchairs speaking to camera.

STEPHEN: ...so it was a quite a lot to take in for sure.

Cut to a close up of Elizabeth talking to camera.

ELIZABETH: I started having uncontrollable blood pressure I went for some imaging to check that out...
We see Elizabeth by the sink taking medicine.

ELIZABETH: ...she said you have a mass on one of your kidneys, said it was stage 3 kidney cancer...

Cut to Elizabeth and Stephen sitting in arm chairs speaking to camera.

ELIZABETH: ...so I had the surgery to have a kidney removed...

Cut to a photo of Elizabeth and Stephen lying close together. Elizabeth is wearing formal wear and a 

necklace and Stephen is wearing a tuxedo.

ELIZABETH: You just feel like your life is just sucked out from under you.

Cut to a close up of Elizabeth talking to camera.

ELIZABETH: If I had never smoked you know, would I'd be going through this. It's hard for me to watch 

him have to clean the house.

Cut to Elizabeth sitting at a table with a plate in front of her. Stephen walks over and sets his plate down 

at the seat next to Elizabeth.

ELIZABETH: And he has to cook for me...

We see Stephen putting folded clothing away in a closet.

ELIZABETH: ...do laundry...

Cut to Elizabeth and Stephen sitting in armchairs next to each other. 

ELIZABETH: I feel like I punishing him for a choice I made when I was 18 years old.

ART CARD: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/QUIT

Logo/legal: CDC

Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

#CDCTips
No. 10-8072.

#### Stanley Thomas Brazil, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1206, 131 S. Ct. 1058,

178 L. Ed. 2d 875,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 917.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 205.
# Anniston’s Stephens receives Global Distribution Excellence: Inventory Management Civilian Manager of the Year

/ Published July 26, 2016
ANNISTON, Alabama, Sandra Stephens, supply technician at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Ala., has been awarded the Global Distribution Excellence: Inventory Management Civilian of the Year award for her knowledge and technical expertise within the Inventory Action Team.
Stephens shouldered a surmountable part of the workload, while simultaneously conquering the daily demands of her inventory duties.  With Stephens’ assistance, the Inventory Action Team completed the all inventories on schedule.  

According to deputy commander, Guy Taylor, “As a dedicated, loyal and dependable employee, Stephens’ selfless service and professional performance was a definable attribute to the success of the DLA Distribution Anniston’s Inventory Action Team”. She performed over 5,000 inventories, with over 14,000 national stock numbers and a total dollar value of more than $187 million. Also, she performed floor to file inspections and checks associated with over 2,000 locations across 10 separate storage areas, while maintaining and inspecting all pieces of IAT's Material Handling Equipment with 100 percent accuracy.

“Stephens’ knowledge of inventory, receiving, warehousing and Distribution Standard System functions has been instrumental in teaching and mentoring new employees, contributing to the success of DLA Distribution Anniston,” said Taylor. Stephens’ expertise has allowed DLA Distribution Anniston to meet DLA’s goal rating for the Sample Controlled, inventories of the year. 

Additionally, Stephens helped to implement and improve the process for inventory management to increase organizational inventory accuracy and decrease DLA Distribution Anniston’s denial rate. Her research and audit knowledge, as well as using Electronic Document Management Service, resulted in the Inventory Action Team researching, tracking and correcting inventory shortages and overages.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-63-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) filed a refund report to comply with the 
settlement of the Gas Research Institute's (GRI) Docket No. RP98-217-
001.
    On June 10, 1998 Columbia passed on the 1997 refund received on May 
29, 1998, from the GRI, as a result of the settlement in Docket RP98-
217-001. This Docket was approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) on April 29, 1998. The refund credits made on 
June 10, 1998 reflected Columbia's eligible firm customers pro rata 
amounts.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 0426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 7, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17890 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-687.

#### Mark Albrecht, et ux., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners v. Brian Treon, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Coroner of Clermont County, Ohio, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

562 U.S. 1201, 131 S. Ct. 1047,

178 L. Ed. 2d 866,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 957.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 617 F.3d 890.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Carpenter, Petitioner,*

No. 91383-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44562-0-II, February 3, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1042. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
US. Department 

of Tronsporrorion 

Federal AlllaHon 

Adrnlnlsiratlon 

May 6, 2016 

Evan Mortenson 

Ce1tification "vvanager, Air Tractor Inc. 

P.O. Box 485 

Olney, Texas 76374 

Dear Mr. Mortenson, 

800 Independence Ave .. S W. 

washington. D.C. 20591 

This is in response to your April29, 2016 letter requesting an extension of the comment 

period for this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, Revision of Airworthiness 

Standards for Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes (Docket FAA2015-1621 ). The NPRM comment period closes on May 13, 2016. We believe sufficient time 

exists for interested persons to submit comments, and as of May 4, 2016, have received over 

17 comments. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration does not fmd it in the best 

interest of the public to extend the comment period. Your request for an extension of the 

comment period is denied. However, as stated in 14 Code of Federal Regulations § 11.45, we 

will consider comments filed late if at all possible to do so without incurring expense or 

delay. 

We have placed this response with your request in the rulemaking docket. 

Sincerely, 

~ 

~ 

Director, Office ofRulemaking
#### *In re Det. of W.C.C.,*

No. 91950-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71403-1-1, April 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 303. *Granted*November 4, 2015.