alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-6516.

#### James H. Kendricks, Jr., Petitioner v. Donald Barrow, Warden.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 990,

178 L. Ed. 2d 819,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 484.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 533, 178 L. Ed. 2d 392, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8478.
No. 09-1566.

#### Patrick Walsh-Faucher, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 1086, 131 S. Ct. 688,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9180.

178 L. Ed. 2d 518,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 215, 178 L. Ed. 2d 46, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5815.
No. 10-7227.

#### Rashaun Barkley, Petitioner v. Larry Glover, Administrator, Northern State Prison, et al.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1065,

178 L. Ed. 2d 879,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1069.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 834, 178 L. Ed. 2d 567, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9751.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.57 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.57 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.57 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.57 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Of The Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corporation. (the "Company")
hereby certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q-SB of the Company for the period ended
June 30, 2004, as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                                  VOTE POWER CORPORATION.


Dated: February 2, 2005           By: /s/ Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  Authorized Agent/Sole Director
				                          Appointed by Board of Directors
                                  on March 19, 2004


Certification Of The Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corporation, (the "Company")
hereby certifies that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q-SB of the Company for the annual period
ended June 30,  2004, as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                                  VOTE POWER CORPORATION.


Dated: February 2, 2005           By: /s/ Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                  Authorized Agent/Sole Director
				                          Appointed by Board of Directors
                                  on March 19, 2004
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald Tucker,
        CEO, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: 
        June 27, 2007








/s/
      Donald Tucker





Donald
      Tucker


CEO/President/Principal
      Executive Officer
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-0930V

Filed: November 4, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JAMES SCAMMAN, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury

* Related to Vaccine Administration

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Amber Wilson, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Lara Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On August 26, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”). The petition alleges that petitioner suffered a shoulder 

injury as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on October 22, 

2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of 

the Office of Special Masters.

On November 2, 2015, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report in which she conceded 

entitlement to compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 2. Specifically, 

respondent determined that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury 

related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and that it was caused-in-fact by the flu 

vaccine he received on October 22, 2014. Id. Respondent identified no other causes 

for petitioner’s SIRVA and determined, based on the medical evidence of record, that 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
petitioner has suffered the condition for more than six months. Id. Respondent

therefore concluded that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation 

under the Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
No. 10-6714.

#### Bobby Banks, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 543,

178 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8347.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*399Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 664.
No. 10-7964.

#### Melvin Lutcher, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1192, 131 S. Ct. 1030,

178 L. Ed. 2d 851,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 665.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Boyle, Petitioner,*

No. 90815-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71965-3-1, July 28, 2014, 2014,183 183 Wn. App. 1. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-119.

#### Leo Stoller, Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Leo Stoller, Petitioner v. Google, Inc.; Leo Stoller, Petitioner v. Pure Fishing, Inc.; and Leo Stoller, Petitioner v. William T. Neary.

562 U.S. 894, 131 S. Ct. 392,

178 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6296.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<pre>

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of The Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section
302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB, as
amended, of Ludlum Construction Co., Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Dated: December 20, 2004         By: /s/ FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                 Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                                 Appointed by Board of Directors
                                 on March 19, 2004

Certification of The Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section
302 Of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 Q-SB, as
amended, of Ludlum Construction Co., Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Dated: December 20, 2004         By: /s/ FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Floyd D. Wilkenson
                                 Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                                 Appointed by Board of Directors
                                 on March 19, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tesfay Abera, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 702]—

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered June 7, 2002 in Albany County, upon a *1156verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s conviction of the crime of assault in the second degree resulted from an altercation during which the victim sustained a deep, 21-inch long laceration to his right arm. Following trial, Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 and then sentenced him to a prison term of seven years and three years of postrelease supervision.

On appeal, defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to prove that he intentionally, rather than recklessly, caused serious physical injury to the victim. We disagree. There was testimony that defendant had been hostile towards the victim and his family throughout the day of the assault, pulled a knife on the victim’s brother-in-law and drove his car into the rear of the victim’s vehicle. In light of this, as well as testimony that defendant was then seen holding a crowbar and a knife just before swinging the crowbar at the victim and physically fighting with him, the trial evidence sufficiently demonstrated defendant’s intent to physically injure the victim *(see People v Hogencamp,*300 AD2d 734, 735 [2002]; *People v Coffin,*263 AD2d 780, 781 [1999]).

Relying on his own testimony that he did not have a knife on the evening in question and the inability of police officers to find a knife at the scene, defendant also claims that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the victim’s injury was caused by a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument rather than broken glass on the ground. The victim’s brother-in-law testified, however, that he observed defendant holding a knife *(see People v Kranz,*155 AD2d 555, 556 [1989], *lv denied*76 NY2d 859 [1990]). Also, the physician who treated the victim at the emergency room testified that the victim’s laceration was “a very straight wound” caused by a very sharp object, no remnants of glass were found in the victim’s arm and the laceration was more consistent with a knife wound *(see People v Wade,*274 AD2d 438, 439 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 939 [2000]; *People v Vincent [Jumont],*231 AD2d 444, 445 [1996], *lvs denied*89 NY2d 925, 931 [1996]). Thus, after reviewing both the sufficiency and the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), we find no basis to disturb the verdict.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his challenge to the severity of the sentence, have been considered and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
No. 10-5212.

#### Marlin E. Jones, Petitioner v. Terry L. Burns.

562 U.S. 909, 131 S. Ct. 259,

178 L. Ed. 2d 171,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7114,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*172Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 658.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

CHIKUNGUNYA VIRUS INFECTIONS 

AMONG LABORATORY WORKERS

Susan Hills, MBBS, MTH

CDC Lead, Chikungunya Vaccines Work Group

Arboviral Diseases Branch

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

Fort Collins, Colorado

ACIP meeting, June 22, 2023
Chikungunya virus management in the laboratory

 Handled at biosafety level (BSL)-3 

 High viral loads in blood samples increase risk for 

laboratory-acquired infections1

1. Simmons G et al, Emerg Infect Dis 2016; Appassakij H et al, Transfusion 2013

2
Information on laboratory worker infections

 Summary article published in 1980 by Subcommittee on 

Arbovirus Laboratory Safety (SALS)1

 Case report in a publication on exposures to pathogens in a 

U.S. laboratory2

 Cases reported to the U.S. national arboviral disease 

surveillance system

1. The Subcommittee on Arbovirus Laboratory Safety of the American Committee on Arthropod-Borne Viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1980

2. Rusnak JM, et al. J Occup Environ Med 2004 3
SALS report1

 Methods

– Conducted literature review and two surveys

– Surveys sent to national and international labs in 1976 and 1978

 39 chikungunya virus disease cases or infections 

– 38 (97%) disease cases, no deaths

– 1 (3%) asymptomatic infection

 Route of transmission

– 7 (18%) aerosol

– 32 (82%) not identified/unknown

1. The Subcommittee on Arbovirus Laboratory Safety of the American Committee on Arthropod-Borne Viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1980

4
Case report from worker in a U.S. laboratory

 Occurred during 1989–2002 

 Needlestick injury 

 Full recovery after slow convalescence with intermittent joint 

pains, headaches, and blurred vision for several months

Rusnak JM, et al. J Occup Environ Med 2004

5
Reports to national arboviral disease surveillance 

system, 2015–2022 

 Four disease cases

– One case hospitalized for observation

– No deaths 

 Route of transmission

– Needlestick (n=2)

– Other percutaneous (n=1)

– Unknown (n=1) 

Photo credit: Getty Images

6
Reported cases likely underrepresent all infections in 

laboratory workers

 Underreporting of cases to national arboviral disease surveillance system

 Asymptomatic infections not reportable to surveillance system

 No formal laboratory surveillance system

 Reluctance to publish

7
Summary

 Laboratory workers at risk for chikungunya virus infections 

and disease

– At least 44 reports, including 4 cases during last 8 years

 Documented modes of transmission include aerosol and 

percutaneous routes

 Likelihood of disease vs. asymptomatic infection probably 

high

8
Thank you

Getty 

Images
No. 10-613.

#### Attorney’s Process and Investigation Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1003,

178 L. Ed. 2d 827,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 746.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 927.
No. 10-8002.

#### Luis Angel Hernandez-Rios, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1193, 131 S. Ct. 1032,

178 L. Ed. 2d 853,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 650.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 272.
No. 10-7083.

#### Michael A. Sveum, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 803,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9494.

178 L. Ed. 2d 537,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 328 Wis. 2d 369, 787 N.W.2d 317.
# C_2015381EN.01002702.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/27

---

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Philip Morris Benelux v Commission

(Case T-520/13) (1)

1

((Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Draft impact assessment report prepared in the context of the proposal for a revision of the directive on tobacco products - Refusal to grant access - Disclosure after commencement of the action - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 381/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Philip Morris Benelux (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: K. Nordlander, lawyer, and P. Harrison, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 15 July 2013 refusing the request for access to preliminary drafts of the impact assessment report attached to the Commission’s proposal for a revised directive on tobacco products.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Philip Morris Benelux. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Philip Morris Benelux.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---