alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.







May 8,
      2008
            /s/
      WILLIAM R. WALKERWilliam
      R. WalkerChief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                       QUIXOTE CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                               as of June 30, 1997

                                                          Jurisdiction
                                                          Under Which
QUIXOTE CORPORATION (PARENT)                              Organized
----------------------------                              -------------
Energy Absorption Systems, Inc.                           Delaware
 Composite Components, Inc.                               Delaware
 E-Tech Testing Services, Inc.                            Delaware
 Safe-Hit Corporation                                     Nevada
 Spin-Cast Plastics, Inc.                                 Indiana

LaserVideo Acquisition Corporation                        Delaware

Legal Technologies, Inc.                                  Delaware
 Litigation Communications, Inc.                          Delaware
 Quixote Steno Corporation                                Delaware
  Quixote DPI Corporation                                 Delaware
   Court Technologies, Inc.                               Delaware
  Quixote IIS Corporation                                 Delaware
  Quixote Limited                                         United Kingdom
  Quixote LSI Corporation                                 Delaware

QualAir Corporation                                       Delaware

Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation                         U.S. Virgin Islands

Quixote Laser Corporation                                 Delaware

Quixote Research Corporation                              Delaware

All of the subsidiaries listed above are wholly-owned by Quixote except as
follows:

Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. is the sole shareholder of Composite 
Components, Inc., E-Tech Testing Services, Inc., Safe-Hit Corporation and 
Spin-Cast Plastics, Inc.

Legal Technologies, Inc. is the sole shareholder of Litigation 
Communications, Inc. and Quixote Steno Corporation.

Quixote Steno Corporation is the sole shareholder of Quixote DPI Corporation, 
Quixote IIS Corporation, Quixote Limited and Quixote LSI Corporation.

Quixote DPI Corporation is the sole shareholder of Court Technologies, Inc.

The Company owns all of the preferred stock of LaserVideo Acquisition 
Corporation (LVAC) and shares voting power with respect to the outstanding 
common stock.  The preferred stock has voting rights and represents 50% of 
the voting stock of LVAC.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37068-37069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18226]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

32 CFR Part 588


Equal Employment Opportunity Discrimination Complaints

AGENCY: Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), 
DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document removes the Department of the Army's Equal 
Employment Opportunity Discrimination Complaints regulation codified in 
32 CFR Chapter V. The part has served its purpose and no longer 
supports other related rules currently in existence. The Army is in the 
process, however, of revising its policies and procedures concerning 
Equal Employment Opportunity and will announce a future proposed rule 
for public comment.

DATES: This rule is effective July 9, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Stanley L. Kelley, Jr., Office of the Assistant Secretary, 2nd 
Floor, 1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202-4508, (703) 
607-1448.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Removal of Part 588 is based on the issuance 
of 29 CFR part 1614 which supersedes the EEOC 29 CFR part 1613.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 588

    Administrative practice and procedure, Equal employment 
opportunity, Government employees.

[[Page 37069]]

PART 588--[REMOVED]

    Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 588 
is removed.
Stanley L. Kelley, Jr.,
Director, Equal Employment Complaints and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 98-18226 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<PAGE>

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
               ---------------------------------------------------


         We have issued our report dated April 20, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
of Environmental Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiary on Form 10-K for the year
ended February 25, 2000 and Part II of this form. We have also audited Schedule
II for each of the three years in the period ended February 25, 2000. In our
opinion, this schedule represents fairly, in all material respects, the
information required to be set forth therein. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Environmental
Tectonics Corporation and Subsidiary of Form S-8 (File No. 333-65469, effective
October 8, 1998), Form S-8 (File No 2-92407, effective August 14, 1984) and on
Form S-3 (File No. 33-42219, effective September 4, 1991).





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 25, 2000
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2849 

To permit law enforcement officers of the Department of the Treasury to 

carry service weapons to their place of residence while off duty, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2019 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To permit law enforcement officers of the Department of 

the Treasury to carry service weapons to their place 

of residence while off duty, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of the 

5 Treasury Officer Protection Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2849 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF 

2 THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY TO 

3 CARRY SERVICE WEAPON TO OFFICER’S 

4 PLACE OF RESIDENCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any law enforcement officer em6 ployed by the Department of the Treasury shall be allowed 

7 to carry the officer’s service weapon to, and store the serv8 ice weapon in, the officer’s place of residence while such 

9 officer is off duty. 

10 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

11 (1) the term ‘‘law enforcement officer’’ means 

12 an employee the duties of whose position include— 

13 (A) the investigation, apprehension, or de14 tention of individuals suspected or convicted of 

15 offenses against the criminal laws of the United 

16 States; or 

17 (B) the protection of officials of the United 

18 States against threats to personal safety; and 

19 (2) the term ‘‘service weapon’’ means any fire20 arm (as that term is defined in section 921(a)(3) of 

21 title 18, United States Code) used by a law enforce22 ment officer when carrying out the officer’s official 

23 duties. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-6012.

#### Tanger Anita Harris, Petitioner v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company, et al.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 987,

178 L. Ed. 2d 816,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 34.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 509, 178 L. Ed. 2d 377, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8469.
SERVED : APRI L8 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F CLOU D DANCE RAVIATIO N FA A DOCKE T NO . CPlOSOOOOl (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-019 2 AHiivtENTO F •^ISPORTMIO M

- TOPPRATiON S

' \ ! I AIQ : 2 2

ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E I n vie w o f

th e impendin g prospectiv e laps e i n FY201 1 appropriation s fundin g govern men t operation s a s o f

Apri l 8 , 2011 , th e Departmen t ha s directe dtha t

al l employee s i n th e Offic e o f Hearing s wil l b e fiirloughe di n th e even t o f suc halapse . Accordingly , i n th e even t o f suc ha lapse , th e Offic e o f

Hearing s wil l clos e o n Friday , Apri l 8 , 2011 , for th e duratio n o f

th e shut down . An y deadline , whethe r se t b y regulatio n o r

previou s order , i s suspende dan dextende dfor th e duratio n o f

th e shutdown . S O ORDERED .
5nni e A . Yode Chie f Administrativ e iLa

w J i Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tWiV\"M' ' I IIMJIIJWJ.J ' ' ' "WT F



### • ^:>lm^^'^^"''' " ! , • :{u/Ki'?- " FA A Docke t No . CPlOSOeOO

l j it^Mi^s'JO'r'lSr'V ' (Civil Penalt y proceeding )

Federa l Aviation Administratio n 800 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin j Denni s R . Haber , Respondent' s Counse J Denni s R . Haber , P.A . t • ^ ^ * „ ^

, 892 5 S.W . 14 8 Street , Suit

e 200 ' ; TH

- : ; Miami , F L3317 6 - ' " ' «'»P'^'S^')'^ . TEL : 305-256-300 2 ^ "'1 " FAX ; 305-256-300

4 Andre aMichell e Harper , Complainan t Office o f th e Regiona

l Counsel , AS O Southert i Region Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Box 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-5200 FAX : 404-305-522 3 5 *_,'*< • v- . ' t:^%.tAj,k . Tc^«^i^l|ji' 4



### The Honorable Ronni e A . Yoder , ChiC j U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n | i.,'^ ; Office o f Hearings , M-20 ^ '^^ ' *" ' 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S .E . ] Eas t Building GroundFloor , RoomEl432< l Washington , D C 2059 0 I TEL : 202-366-214 2 j , FAX : 202-366-753 6 \ 

## 1'':% - 4

Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e i Docket , Fedos l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : .'^ja^ r D ; ^.{45 7

-^..j-;-^ ;

. _ C«»«ier, us e th e folio' 

### |S;WtfWilburWri^» i i|^0C^3O . : Hearifl g Suit e
K «>• ' ^/^M" -
No. 10-672.

#### R. Jay Drolett, Petitioner v. Edward J. DeMarco, Jr., et al.

562 U.S. 1194, 131 S. Ct. 1016,

178 L. Ed. 2d 855,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 616.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 7.
HMIRS Technical Support for SDS, HCC, Transporta�on & 

GHS Label (Revised 4/4/2024)

Please submit inquiries by eMAIL TO: hmis001.dscr@dla.mil 

HMIRS Tech Support Helpline — DSN: 695.4371 | Commercial: 804.279.4371 

DSN FAX: 695.4149 | Commercial FAX: 804.279.4149

INITIAL INQUIRY FOLLOW UP

MANDATORY DATA OPTIONAL DATA

Date

Requestor

Phone

eMail

FAX

Ac�vity

NSN

Contract No.

Cage

Part Number

 SDS

 HCC

 Transporta�on

 GHS Label

RESPONSE:

Trade Name:

Company or Contractor Name:

Company Address:

City:

State: Zip:

Company Phone

Company Fax

INQUIRY DESCRIBE YOUR INQUIRY REQUEST
No. 10-7497.

#### Robert Channelle, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1117, 131 S. Ct. 844,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9708.

178 L. Ed. 2d 573,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 729.
LOCAL AGREEMENT – Article S31 

OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS TOOLS

BETWEEN

DLA Philadelphia (includes all bargaining unit employees for DLA Components co-located 

at the Naval Support Activity – Philadelphia Installation)

AND

American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), Local 62 

Section 1 – General

A. Article 31 – Office Communications Tools, Paragraph 6, of the Master Labor Agreement 

(MLA) between DLA and Council 169, dated September 2022, allows for local 

negotiations for use of accountability rosters. Accordingly, the parties agree to the use of 

accountability rosters as set forth below. 

Section 2 – Accountability Rosters 

A. The Employer and the Union agree that accountability rosters are beneficial to ensuring 

that all employees who are scheduled to be on duty can be accounted for. 

B. All employees who elect a flexible work schedule will sign-in upon arrival and sign-out 

when their workday ends. The preferred method of communication is at the sole 

discretion of the supervisor. 

For the Union: For DLA:

__________________________ _________________________ 

Paul Williams, President David Johns, Deputy Director, Medical 

AFGE Local 62 DLA Troop Support/Philadelphia

___________________________ __________________________ 

Date Date
#### *State, Respondent, v. Courtney, Petitioner,*

No. 91458-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72032-5-I, February 17, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 1058. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
# C_2015389EN.01003001.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2015 — Petro Suisse Intertrade v Council

(Joined Cases T-156/13 and T-373/14) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Infra-State body - Locus standi and interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Right to be heard - Obligation to notify - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property))

(2015/C 389/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA (Pully, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta, N. Pilkington and D. Sellers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 71) and also of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 55), and, secondly, of the Council’s decision contained in its letter of 14 March 2014 to maintain the restrictive measures taken against the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

s0616 

# Order

June 23, 2009

139031

_____________ _______________ _____________

In re DENZELL CHRISTIAN COVINGTON and NYANNA ANN-LISSETTE COVINGTON, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 139031 COA: 291640 Ingham CC Family Division: 08-000381-NA; 08-000382-NA BERNARD A. COVINGTON, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### *In re Parental Rights to K.M.M.,*

No. 91757-4.

Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45809-8-II, May 5, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 545. *Granted*January 6, 2016.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        4
        
        5
        
        6
        
        7
        
        8 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        6
        
        7
        
        8 (current)
        
        9
        
        10
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                  SUBSIDIARIES OF
                               THE TITAN CORPORATION


                                                       State of Incorporation
     Name                                                 or Jurisdiction
     ----                                              ----------------------
1.   Diversified Control Systems, Inc.                      Delaware

2.   Eldyne, Inc.                                           California

3.   Federal Services, Inc.                                 California

4.   Pulse Sciences, Inc.                                   California

5.   Titan Environmental Corporation                        Delaware

6.   Linkabit Wireless, Inc.                                Delaware

7.   TomoTherapeutics, Inc.                                 Delaware

8.   Unidyne Corporation                                    Virginia

9.   ServNow! NetTechnologies, Inc.                         Delaware

10.  Titan Broadband Communications Corporation             Delaware

11.  Titan Software Systems Corporation                     Delaware

12.  Linkabit Wireless, Ltd.                                Cayman Islands

13.  Titan Purification, Inc.                               Delaware

14.  Titan Defense Systems Corporation,                     Delaware
     doing business as Titan Technologies
     and Information Systems Corporation.