alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.A








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, James J. Cleary, President, certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
    
 /s/
      James J. ClearyJames J.
      ClearyPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)El Paso
      Natural Gas Company
   March 2,
      2009
          A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2827 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem any 

perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance used as a food contact substance to be unsafe and therefore treated as adulterated under such 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2019 

Mrs. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

deem any perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance 

used as a food contact substance to be unsafe and therefore treated as adulterated under such Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Food Containers 

5 Safe from PFAS Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2827 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FOOD CONTACT SUB2 STANCES CONTAINING PERFLUOROALKYL 

3 AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES. 

4 Paragraph (6) of section 409(h) of the Federal Food, 

5 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348(h)(6)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘(6)(A) 

8 DEFINITION.—’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(B) PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS.— 

11 ‘‘(i) DEEMED UNSAFE.—Beginning on January 

12 1, 2022, any PFAS used as a food contact sub13 stance is deemed to be unsafe for the purposes of 

14 this section and the application of clause (2)(C) of 

15 section 402(a). 

16 ‘‘(ii) DEFINITIONS.—In this subparagraph: 

17 ‘‘(I) The term ‘PFAS’ means a 

18 perfluoroalkyl substance or a polyfluoroalkyl 

19 substance that is man-made with at least 1 

20 fully fluorinated carbon atom. 

21 ‘‘(II) The term ‘perfluoroalkyl substance’ 

22 means a man-made chemical of which all of the 

23 carbon atoms are fully fluorinated carbon 

24 atoms. 

25 ‘‘(III) The term ‘polyfluoroalkyl substance’ 

26 means a man-made chemical containing a mix 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2827 IH

1 of fully fluorinated carbon atoms, partially 

2 fluorinated carbon atoms, and nonfluorinated 

3 carbon atoms.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60283

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ramiro Tzul,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:19-CR-31-1

Before Southwick, Oldham and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Ramiro Tzul appeals his eight-month sentence imposed after

revocation of his term of supervised release pertaining to his 2019 conviction 

for illegal reentry into the United States after being previously deported. He 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 3, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60283 Document: 00516002793 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/03/2021
No. 21-60283

2

argues that his sentence, which was within the advisory range, is 

substantively unreasonable. 

Both parties contend that review is for plain error because Tzul did 

not preserve his argument in the district court. However, by requesting a 

sentence lower than the advisory range, Tzul preserved his substantivereasonableness challenge. See Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 

762, 766–67 (2020). Thus, we review his preserved challenge to the

revocation sentence under a “plainly unreasonable” standard. See United 

States v. Sanchez, 900 F.3d 678, 682 (5th Cir. 2018). 

“A sentence is substantively unreasonable if it (1) does not account 

for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant 

weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of 

judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” United States v. Warren, 720 

F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013) (quotation marks and citation omitted). A 

revocation sentence within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable. 

See United States v. Badgett, 957 F.3d 536, 541 (5th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 

141 S. Ct. 827 (2020).

Despite Tzul’s arguments to the contrary, the record shows that the 

district court considered Tzul’s testimony and mitigating arguments. In 

imposing the sentence, the district court articulated its consideration of the 

relevant sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Tzul has not 

demonstrated any clear error of judgment in the court’s balancing of the 

relevant sentencing factors. Rather, his arguments amount to nothing more 

than a disagreement with the sentence imposed, which is insufficient grounds 

for reversal. See Badgett, 957 F.3d at 541. Accordingly, Tzul fails to 

demonstrate an abuse of the district court’s wide sentencing discretion. See 

Warren, 720 F.3d at 332; United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 

2011). AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-60283 Document: 00516002793 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/03/2021
# I am DLA

/ Published Feb. 29, 2016

**My name is:**Olivia Lynn Kortuem.

**I am:**A program management analyst in the Military Service Support Division of DLA Logistics Operations.

**Describe your job in a sentence.**Along with colleagues from various DLA offices and activities, I represent DLA at expositions and symposiums across the United States by staffing a booth, where we share information, answer customers’ questions and make them aware of the full range of products and services DLA provides.

**How long have you worked at DLA?**As a full-time employee, since spring of 2012 — but I had previously worked in the DLA Office of General Counsel for two summers, under the Workforce Recruitment Program.

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**I really enjoy representing an agency that supports the military services, as well as emergency responders — the people who protect and secure our country and help those in need. I also love meeting and working with so many different DLA employees who help staff the booth. Their expertise and their concern for our customers they interact with is so inspiring and exciting to see — that all of us at DLA take such pride in what we do and who we serve.

**What are your best memories of working here?**On so many occasions, customers and stakeholders come to our booth to ask for help. Being able to provide direction and information that helps them is rewarding every time. At one conference, a DoD firefighter was concerned about the costs of various equipment items his department needed. I recommended his department use DLA’s Reutilization/Transfer/Donation program for available items, to avoid having to spend any money at all on them. He hadn’t known about this program and was really glad to have that option. It was a great feeling for me, because I managed to resolve his frustration and walked away with another helpful option.

**How do you make a difference?**I get to interact with a wide variety of folks, from the highest level of government to ROTC cadets, to give them information that helps DLA build a positive relationship with them. I think our team helps them put a friendly face to what can seem like a massive, faceless bureaucracy. So I like being able to directly boost perceptions of our agency by helping DLA customers find solutions to their logistics problems.
# Troop Support Pacific ensures South Korea DFACs have fresh chicken despite poultry ban

/ Published March 22, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Despite South Korea’s ban on poultry items from the U.S., service members who eat at dining facilities across the peninsula continue to eat fresh chicken, thanks to Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Pacific.South Korea halted imports of U.S. poultry Jan. 17 following the discovery of avian flu at a turkey farm in Indiana.The Subsistence prime vendor expected to run out of poultry in mid-February, said Ron Bate, a forward logistics specialist at DLA Troop Support Pacific’s [South] Korea Area Office. That left little time to find a local vendor.The new vendor also needed time to ramp up before the prime vendor’s stock was depleted.“All of this was projected to happen the same week as a local Korean holiday that was going to basically shut down the country,” Bate said. “This left no room for error.”The Korea Area Office worked with U.S. Army veterinarians to identify a local vendor able to provide chicken suitable for consumption by American service members, said John Moye, Korea Area Office deputy chief. Then contracting personnel sourced and awarded a blanket purchase agreement for eight-piece chicken.The first delivery of 351 cases of chicken from the vendor arrived Feb. 5 at the prime vendor’s warehouse in Pyeongtaek, Korea, Moye said. The Korea Area Office team and a contracting officer representative were there to meet the vendors and ensure the chicken was delivered successfully.The chicken was then transferred to the prime vendor for distribution to 40 military dining facilities throughout South Korea. This process has continued weekly and will continue as long as the Korean poultry ban is in effect, Moye said.“The transition from (the prime vendor) purchased poultry to the implementation of the BPA vendor product was seamless and transparent to our customers,” Moye said.
No. 09-1403.

#### Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc., Petitioner v. Halliburton Co., et al.

562 U.S. 1127, 131 S. Ct. 856,

178 L. Ed. 2d 622,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9.

January 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 597 F.3d 330.
No. 09-11089.

#### Thelma Williams, Petitioner v. C/O Crouch, et al.

562 U.S. 1087, 131 S. Ct. 691,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9352.

178 L. Ed. 2d 520,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*521Former decision, 562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 139, 178 L. Ed. 2d 84, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6008.
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Addendum (the  "Addendum") is made effective as of the 15th day of
December,  2000 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and Jan R.  Van  Gorder
effective as of December 16, 1997.

         WHEREAS,  the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,   the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  has  previously
considered  and agreed to extend  the term of the  Agreement  from its  original
term; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of  Directors  of the  Company  at its  meeting  of
December  12, 2000 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

         1.  Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby
amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2002.

         2.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full
force and effect.

ATTEST:                                              ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/ Stephen A. Milne                          By:  /s/ F. William Hirt
    Stephen A. Milne                                   F. William Hirt
    President & CEO                                    Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/ Sheila M. Hirsch                               /s/ Jan R. Van Gorder
    Sheila M. Hirsch                                   Jan R. Van Gorder
    Executive Secretary                                6796 Manchester Beach Rd.
                                                       Fairview, PA   16415


                                       33
No. 10-6309.

#### David J. Washington, Petitioner v. Louis Harrelson, et al.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 858,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 668.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 571, 178 L. Ed. 2d 418, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8682.
No. 10-5329.

#### In re Adrian Marion Smith, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 278,

178 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7806.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### J.A.D., an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[50 NYS3d 878]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered September 3, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record, which includes conflicting expert affidavits, presents triable issues as to whether defendant Arevalo deviated from good and accepted medical practice, and whether such alleged deviation proximately caused the infant plaintiff’s injuries *(see generally Dallas-Stephenson v Waisman,*39 AD3d 303, 306-307 [1st Dept 2007]). Plaintiff’s expert neonatologist sufficiently raised questions as to whether Arevalo failed to *665timely diagnose the infant plaintiff’s abdominal condition and obtain a surgical consult *(see Diaz v New York Downtown Hosp.,*99 NY2d 542, 544 [2002]; *Cregan v Sachs,*65 AD3d 101, 108-109 [1st Dept 2009]). Although surgery on the infant plaintiff did not occur for 36 hours following the infant’s transfer to another facility, this does not warrant a different determination (see *Bradley v Soundview Healthcenter,*4 AD3d 194 [1st Dept 2004]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
# C_2015371EN.01001201.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Kyowa Hakko Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover

(Case C-344/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification of goods - Amino acid mixes used for the preparation of foodstuffs for infants and young children allergic to cow’s milk proteins - Classification under tariff headings 2106 ‘food preparations’ or 3003 ‘medicinal products’))

(2015/C 371/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kyowa Hakko Europe GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, must be interpreted as meaning that amino acid mixes, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which are used in the preparation of foodstuffs for infants and young children who are allergic to cow’s milk proteins, must be classified under heading 2106 of that nomenclature as ‘food preparations’ since, because of their objective characteristics and properties, those goods do not have clearly defined therapeutic or prophylactic characteristics, with an effect concentrated on precise functions of the human organism and, accordingly, are not capable of being applied in the prevention or treatment of diseases or ailments and also are not naturally intended for medical use, which it is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.

1

---
#### People v Barton

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 750 (Queens)

denied 8/1/16 (Fahey, J.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1777

In Re: DENNIS A. GIVENS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(5:10-cv-00026-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis A. Givens, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis A. Givens petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

seeking to compel the United States Attorney’s Office for the 

Northern District of West Virginia and the United States Postal 

Inspection Service to investigate and prosecute his allegations 

of forgery and fraud. We conclude that Givens is not entitled 

to the relief he seeks.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 

509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the 

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). The relief sought by Givens is not 

available by way of mandamus. See Wayte v. United States, 470 

U.S. 598, 607 (1985) (“[T]he Government retains broad discretion 

as to whom to prosecute.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); 

Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) (“[P]rivate 

citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the 

prosecution or nonprosecution of another.”).

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                       967
<INVENTORY>                                     25,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,285
<PP&E>                                         212,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,884
<BONDS>                                         63,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,988
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,182
<SALES>                                        317,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,874
<CGS>                                          263,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  276,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,340)
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17449]



[[Page 35909]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 986]


Approval of Export Manufacturing Activity Within Foreign-Trade 
Zone 216; Olympia, Washington; Darigold, Inc. (Dairy By-Products)

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Port of Olympia, Washington, grantee of FTZ 216, has 
requested authority under Sec. 400.32(b)(1) of the Board's regulations 
on behalf of Darigold, Inc., to process liquid whey permeate for export 
under zone procedures within FTZ 216 (filed 3-19-98, FTZ Docket 13-98);
    Whereas, pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act 
for the Board in making such decisions on new manufacturing/processing 
activity under certain circumstances, including situations where the 
proposed activity is for export only (Sec. 400.32(b)(1)(ii)); and,
    Whereas, the FTZ Staff has reviewed the proposal, taking into 
account the criteria of Sec. 400.31, and the Executive Secretary has 
recommended approval;
    Now, therefore, the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
acting for the Board pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the 
recommendation and hereby approves the request subject to the Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28, and further subject to 
a restriction requiring that all foreign-origin, tariff-rate-quota 
dairy products admitted to FTZ 216 for the Darigold, Inc., activity 
shall be reexported, as indicated in the application.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 1998.
Richard W. Moreland,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17449 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P