alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015213EN.01003301.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España v Commission

(Case T-623/13) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning two national competition procedures - Documents submitted to the Commission by a national authority within the framework of cooperation provided for by EU law - Refusal of access - Exception related to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception related to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - No obligation for the Institution concerned to carry out a specific and individual examination of the content of the documents concerned in the request for access when the investigation at issue is definitively closed - No need for an organisational measure in the procedure requesting the documents at issue - Failure to take account of the special situation of the applicant))

(2015/C 213/55)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Creus Carreras and A. Valiente Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the Defendant: The Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze, K. Petersen and A. Lippstreu, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission decision of 18 September 2013 refusing to grant the applicant access to certain documents concerning the exchange of correspondence between the Commission and the Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (CNC, Spanish national competition commission), as regards two procedures opened by the latter.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
# Field rep uses ‘melon’ to provide DLA customers with fresh produce

/ Published Sept. 27, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Joseph Miler once held the largest watermelon record at the Kentucky State Fair. That was in 1986 and the watermelon he grew was 155 pounds, a record that stood for nearly 20 years.

But Miller doesn’t use his produce expertise just to set records. He also uses it to support the warfighter and other Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support customers as a field representative for the Subsistence supply chain. 

Subsistence field reps live and work throughout the United States. Miller works with military customers in Illinois, Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin. He helps provide them with produce, dairy items, bread and more.

“Getting to help our warfighters is great,” said Miller. “I have always made sure that I take my experience of produce to be able to buy the best product for our military.”

Miller resolves customers’ problems, helps them order and ensures deliveries are made on time.

“I kind of am a trouble shooter,” Miller said. “If we have any problems that arise from any of our military bases, I am usually the one that goes out and looks at it.”

He also works with Native American tribes and schools in those states who order produce through the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program.

The start of the school year was a busy time for Miller. Several schools in Minnesota are new customers in the DOD Fresh program and Miller worked with them to ensure they’re able to order produce through the system. 

“We have a lot of new schools that come onboard, a lot of new districts and a lot of personnel changes,” he said. “So it is real hectic in the beginning to try to get the new schools added.”

Patricia Scott, the chief of garrison feeding in Subsistence, has known Miller since he started with DLA 21 years ago.

“He is a pleasure to work with and is very knowledgeable about fresh fruits and vegetables,” Scott said. “He is a Subsistence guru top to bottom.”

Miller’s Subsistence expertise includes studying agriculture at the University of Kentucky. He grew up on a farm and three generations of his family have grown watermelons. And he still has his sights on that watermelon record.

“My goal now is get one to 200 pounds,” he said.
# C_2014329EN.01002601.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/26

---

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — ASPA v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (ARGENTARIA)

(Case T-502/13) (1)

1

2014/C 329/41

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 I 0 1 51

. STERLI N G PLANET, I NC. v . GRP HOLDCO, LLC et a l

.

On Febru a ry 28, 2024, the Geo r gia State- w id e B u siness Co urt entered an o rd er grantin g p a rtial su mmary ju d gment to p laintif f GRP H o ld c o , LLC o n d ef end ant Sterling Planet, I nc

. ’ s pro misso ry esto p p el c laim, a nd granted p artial s u m m a r y j u d gment to GRP on Sterling’ s bu siness relatio ns c laim. Sterling f iled an a p p lic atio n

f o r d isc retio nary a p p eal and a d irec t a p peal, w hic h has been d o c k eted as C a s e N o.

A 24A 1 281

.

“ An o rd er granting su mmary j u d gment o n any issu e or as to any p arty shall be

su bj ec t to rev iew by ap p eal. ” OCGA § 9

- 1 1

- 56 (h). M o reo ver, all ru lings within that

o rd er and any o ther no n- f inal ru lings entered in the c ase may also be raised as p art o f

su c h a d irec t ap p eal. See OCGA § 5- 6- 34 ( d )

. I n light of Sterling’ s d irec t ap p eal o f the

trial c o u rt’ s ord er, this ap p lic atio n is su perf lu o u s. A c c ord ingly, this ap plic atio n is
hereby D I SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t

r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.
W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t
h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. April 16, 2024

04/16/2024
## Harcros Chemicals Inc. 5200 Speaker Road**!'''''~''''·I"'\.r·'**

## \tr-o Kansas City, KS 66106 

### :\c..l..tt.l ,;'

## c. 

# OPPT calc Telephone: 913/621-7747 Fax: 913/621-7746 

# 2012JAH 18 

# AMtI:41 E-mail: OrganicsCS@Harcros.com Date 

### 01/17/12

Paul Campanella Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Control and Toxies (Oppn U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) EPA East Building, Room E6428 (202-564-8930) 1201 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 (202-564-8930) Attn: TSCA Section 4 40 CFR 

### § 799.5087 (Docket

### # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531) Telephone number: 202-564-8091 

### RE: Request for Extension ofTestingfor D-Gluco-Heptonic acid. monosodiumsalt, (2 xi)­ Dear Paul: Harcros Chemicals Inc. submitted a letter ofintentfor D-gluco-Heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)­ [CAS# 31138-65-5] on April 5, 2011. We are requesting an extension until October 31, 2012 to complete the testing requirements in accordance with EPA'sfinal rule, Testing ofCertain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second GroupofChemicals, published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2011 at76 Fed. Reg. 1067. Please let us know ifthis extension request is acceptable to EPA. Ifany further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact me at (913) 621-7802 oratasavini@harcros.com.

# a:+~ Ann Marie Savini Harcros Chemicals Inc. Regulatory Specialist

cc: Peter Radford Howard Stevenson John Miles James Grantham Don Meuschke File



### 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 401 200 000 3 3



# CONTAiNS NO 

# C81JACOH BOUREH 

## LTR (913) 621-7733 

### 1 OF 1 HARCHOS CHEM I C.'LS I Ne 52aO-SPEAKER RD KANSAS C I TV KS 66106 

### SHIP 

## TO: PAUL CAMPANELLA (202) 564-8930 US EPA (OppT) 

## (oCO) (7407M) EPA EAST BLDG, RM E6428 TSCA SECTION 4 1201 CONSTITUTION AVE, NW 

# WASHINGTON DC 20460

BllllHG: PIP 

# MD 201 9-80
11111111111111

REF 1:0061 REF 2:21650 WS 14. D 21 SAHSUHG**~RP77** 21. OA lU/2Bl1
# C_2013147EN.01002201.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/22

---

Action brought on 8 March 2013 — Scheepsbouw Nederland v Commission

(Case T-140/13)

2013/C 147/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Scheepsbouw Nederland (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Struckmann, lawyer, and G. Forwood, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission of 20 November 2012 in case SA.34736 (Early depreciation of certain assets acquired through a financial leasing), published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 13 December 2012 (OJ 2012 C 384, p. 2); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission of 20 November 2012 in case SA.34736 (Early depreciation of certain assets acquired through a financial leasing), published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 13 December 2012 (OJ 2012 C 384, p. 2); and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to comply with Article 108(3) TFEU and Article 4(2) and 4(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (1).

1

In this respect, the applicant argues that, in view of the circumstances of the case, as well as the insufficient and incomplete nature of the substantive examination carried out by the Commission during the preliminary examination procedure, there is sufficient evidence of the existence of serious difficulties as to the assessment of the proposed measure. The Commission was therefore not properly able to conclude, following its preliminary examination, that the measure in question was not State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. The Commission had no choice but to open the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1)

1

---
2017-0338.

#### State v. Walter.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104443, 2017-Ohio-466.
# DLA Aviation Pathways to Career Excellence program graduates combined classes 

/ Published June 9, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Procurement Process Support Directorate’s Training Division and Business Process Support Directorate’s Supply/Tech Training Division celebrated the graduation of 45 people from the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence program June 7. The ceremony took place in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

PaCE is a 2-year training program designed to train entry-level personnel for subsequent advancement to the journey-level in professional, administrative, and technological career fields. This is accomplished through on-the-job assignments, cross-training, rotational assignments, and formal training (e.g. classroom, distance learning, web-based training, conferences and seminars).

Lashana Crone, chief of DLA Human Resources Career Management Division, gave opening remarks, after which DLA Aviation Acquisition Executive Cathy Contreras delivered the keynote address.

“Graduates, look to your left and to your right. You are our future. You will be the future leaders of this organization. The innovations you imagine will shape our future.” Contreras said. “Take opportunities when they are presented to you, never stop learning, always seek to make things better, make suggestions, make changes.”

The graduation was a combination of PaCE group 40 from fall 2022 and group 41 from this past spring and represented four of the 10 PaCE career fields: contract, supply, quality assurance and information technology specialists.

Stephanie Wideman began her PaCE journey back in 2020. The inventory management specialist within DLA Aviation’s Planning Directorate’s Engines/Airframes Division was part of group 40.

“What I learned in the program has been completely helpful to me since I have been in my position. I was able to take the foundation of information that was learned and continue to build on it,” Wideman said.

Group 41 PaCE graduate James Moton Jr. is a quality assurance specialist within DLA Aviation’s Supplier Operations Original Equipment Manufacturer Directorate. His PaCE journey began in the summer of 2021.

“I feel that the PaCE program was a great foundational preparation for my success. My goal is to become an active contributor to the PaCE program as a peer, so that my experience can help add significant value to its overall purpose and growth,” Moton Jr. said.
No. 10-6687.

#### Armando Gaona, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 541,

178 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8416.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLLUTION

PREVENTION AND TOXICS

4UG 2 0 2013

Mr. James L. Bero

Senior Vice President	1

Environment, Health and Safety

BASF Corporation

100 Park Avenue

Florham Park, NJ 07932

Re: Suhmitting REACH Studies to Comply with a Test Rule Issued under

Section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act

Dear Mr. Bero;

This letter is in response to your letter of August 2, 2013, offering to provide EPA with

robust summaries and fall study reports to satisfy testing required by a test rule issued

under section 4 of the. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 2-Butenedioic acid

(2E)-, di-C8-18-alkyl esters (CASRN 68610-90-2). Your letter stated that the studies

would "carry a notice of BASF copyright and reservation of data compensation rights for

any commercial use" and that BASF "would ask US EPA not to make these study reports

available electronically on its websites or otherwise (e.g., at www.regulations.gov)." EPA

has considered your request, but cannot promise to withhold the information.

Section 14 of TSCA (15 USC 2613), concerning the disclosure of data, provides for the

disclosure of health and safety studies required under section 4 of TSCA. While business

information submitted under TSCA may be claimed as confidential by a submitter, such

claims are treated in accordance with EPA confidentiality regulations pursuant to 40 CFR

part 2, subpart B. Permitted claims are limited, and confidentiality is not guaranteed. In

particular, 40 CFR 2.215(a) provides that EPA may not enter into an agreement with a

business to keep information confidential unless the agreement is consistent with the

subpart B regulations. Because EPA has not made a determination under 40 CFR 2.205 ^

that the copyrighted information is entitled to confidential treatment, EPA cannot commit

to withholding that information.

In addition, it is EPA's policy to make test data publicly available. See

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html. Subject to subpart B

procedures, it is EPA's practice to post test data in the publicly-available electronic
docket. Nothing, however, prevents a submitter from marking the study with a copyright

notice, and EPA would not redact the notice when posting the study to the electronic

docket.	;

Accordingly, BASF may submit the REACH documents to EPA to fulfill the test

requirements for 2-Butenedioic acid (2E)-, di-C8-18-alkyl esters (CASRN 68610-90-2),

but EPA cannot guarantee that they will be kept confidential or that they will ultimately

be deemed to have satisfied the test requirements.

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact John Schaeffer of my staff

(schaeffer j ohn@epa. gov ;202-564-8173).

Sincerely,

Paul Lewis, Ph.D.

Chief

Chemical Information and

Testing Branch

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112
# C_2015389EN.01000601.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul roman and Serviciul public comunitar regim permise de conducere și înmatriculare a autovehiculelor

(Case C-69/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness - Res judicata - Recovery of undue payments - Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law - Final decision of a court or tribunal imposing payment of a tax which is incompatible with EU law - Application for revision of such a decision - National legislation allowing the revision, in the light of later preliminary rulings given by the Court, of final decisions of a court or tribunal made exclusively in administrative proceedings))

(2015/C 389/06)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dragoș Constantin Târșia

Applicant:

Defendants: Statul roman and Serviciul public comunitar regim permise de conducere și înmatriculare a autovehiculelor

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law, in particular the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, must be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances such as those in the dispute in the main proceedings, a situation where there is no possibility for a national court to revise a final decision of a court or tribunal made in the course of civil proceedings when that decision is found to be incompatible with an interpretation of EU law upheld by the Court of Justice of the European Union after the date on which that decision became final, even though such a possibility does exist as regards final decisions of a court or tribunal incompatible with EU law made in the course of administrative proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 16, 2001 included in this Form 10-K, into
Weatherford International, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement File
Nos. 33-31662, 33-56384, 33-56386, 33-65790, 33-64349, 333-13531, 333-36598,
333-41344, 333-44272, 333-44345, 333-48320, 333-48322, 333-53633, and 333-87057.




ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Houston, Texas
March 21, 2001
No. 10-5213.

#### Rafael Caraza-Valdez, aka Salvador Rivera-Rivera, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1181, 131 S. Ct. 993,

178 L. Ed. 2d 831,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 853.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 552.
#### Murray T. Braun et al., Respondents, v Abe Safdie et al., Appellants.

[767 NYS2d 882]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated December 23, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

This action was marked off the trial calendar in May 2001 and automatically dismissed in May 2002 pursuant to CPLR 3404. The plaintiffs did not move to restore the action until November 2002. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs were required to establish a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecution of the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants *(see Fernandez v Staten Is. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc.,*
      *474289 AD2d 372 [2001]; *Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d 126,131 [2001]). The plaintiffs failed to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
# C_2015213EN.01001301.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/13

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2015 (requet for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Madrid — Spain) — Rosa dels Vents Assessoria SL v U Hostels Albergues Juveniles SL

(Case C-491/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 5(1) - Concept of ‘third party’ - Proprietor of a later trade mark))

(2015/C 213/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 3 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rosa dels Vents Assessoria SL

Applicant:

Defendant: U Hostels Albergues Juveniles SL

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, of 22 October 2008, to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, must be interpreted as meaning that the exclusive right of the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent any third party from using, in course of trade, signs identical with or similar to his mark extends to a third-party proprietor of a later trade mark, without the need for that latter mark to have been declared invalid beforehand.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---