alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          46,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (957)
<INVENTORY>                                     26,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,981
<PP&E>                                          48,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,038)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,189
<SALES>                                        293,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,042
<CGS>                                          111,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (957)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (458)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,471)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013304EN.01002102.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/21

---

Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Triarii v Commission

(Case T-435/13)

2013/C 304/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Triarii BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Verhellen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission (Re.: ENER B 1/IMMR(2013) ENER.B.1.2638778) dated 20 June 2013 in order to include the offer of the applicant in the tender; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission (Re.: ENER B 1/IMMR(2013) ENER.B.1.2638778) dated 20 June 2013 in order to include the offer of the applicant in the tender;

| — | In case the Court’s decision, as sought, is taken after the tender is awarded to a bidder:






  — | Annul the current tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 in order to give the applicant a chance to bid again; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

In case the Court’s decision, as sought, is taken after the tender is awarded to a bidder:

—

Annul the current tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 in order to give the applicant a chance to bid again;

| — | Annul the decision to be taken by the European Commission granting tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 to a bidder; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision to be taken by the European Commission granting tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 to a bidder; and/or

| — | Grant damages in compensation of a missed opportunity, due to the exclusion of the applicant from the tender No ENER/B1/2013-371. |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant damages in compensation of a missed opportunity, due to the exclusion of the applicant from the tender No ENER/B1/2013-371.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the General Court is competent to try the present case, in conformity with Article 263 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the General Court is competent to try the present case, in conformity with Article 263 TFEU.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that, through its conduct, the Commission created legitimate expectation that the bid was served in due time on it. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that, through its conduct, the Commission created legitimate expectation that the bid was served in due time on it.

---
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 41



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 23
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
as of February 2, 1997 and January 28, 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 1997, which report
appears in the February 2, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-
ALCO Stores, Inc.



     /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

          Wichita, Kansas
          April 29, 1997


<PAGE 43>
</PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33953-33954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,386]


E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated, Martinsville, 
Virginia; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 12, 1998, applicable to 
all workers of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated, located 
in Martinsville, Virginia. The notice will be published soon in the 
Federal Register.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
nylon yarn. New information provided by the company shows that some 
workers of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated were leased 
from Belcan Corporation and Cad Plus Technical Services, both of 
Martinsville, Virginia. The leased workers provided computer and

[[Page 33954]]

information systems support services to the Martinsville, Virginia 
location of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company. Worker separations 
occurred at Balcan Corporation and Cad Plus Technical Services as a 
result of worker separations of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the workers certification to 
include the workers of Belcan Corporation and Cad Plus Technical 
Services, Martinsville, Virginia.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated adversely 
affected by imports of nylon yarn.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,386 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated, 
located in Martinsville, Virginia and leased workers of Belcan 
Corporation and Cad Plus Technical Services, located in 
Martinsville, Virginia that provided computer and information 
systems support services for the production of nylon yarn produced 
at E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated, Martinsville, 
Virginia who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after March 10, 1997 through May 12, 2000 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of June 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-16558 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# EUCOM and AFRICOM regional operations director visits Distribution headquarters

/ Published Aug. 24, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Army Col. William Krahling, director of United States European Command and United States Africa Command Regional Operations, and his staff visited DLA Distribution headquarters and its largest distribution center in the network, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., on Aug. 18 to discuss DLA’s global logistics processes and how DLA Distribution supports the warfighter.

The group began at DLA Distribution headquarters with a command overview, which highlighted DLA Distribution’s worldwide network, special functions the command provides - such as kitting and hazardous material handling - and transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA.

Following the overview, the group toured the Foreign Military Sales warehouse as well as the Eastern Distribution Center, the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse.  He was walked through the organization’s key locations, including receiving operations, the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area.

This visit was part of DLA Distribution’s ongoing efforts to partner with warfighting customers to provide efficient, effective, and best value support. According to a March 15, 2016 article, DLA’s most prominent example of support to AFRICOM is Operation United Assistance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065801
<NAME>                        DERMATOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         28,140
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,140
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       200
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,140
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a14(a)/15d14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer



I, James R. Bazet, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cobra Electronics Corporation;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2004 |  | /S/    JAMES R. BAZET        
|                     |  | James R. Bazet               
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-257-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1998, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
August 1, 1998:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 212
First Revised Sheet No. 265-B
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 279
First Revised Sheet No. 279-C
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 280
Third Revised Sheet No. 281
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 282

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to submit 
tariff sheets which implement Version 1.2 of the GISB standards 
pursuant to Order No. 587-G and as required by Section 284.10(b) of the 
Commission's regulations.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17903 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeLand and MaritimeAboutConferencesSupply Chain Alliance Speaker Biographies

# DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference Speakers

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

 

----

**Back to main conference page**

                      - Contact Us
                      - Site Index
                      - Strategic Plan
                      - DLA IG Hotline
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act
                      - Whistleblower Protection
                      - DLA Careers
                      - Images
                      - Webmaster
                      - EEO
                      - Section 508
                      - Public Affairs
                      - SAPR
                      - External Links Disclaimer
                      - DOD Information Quality Guidelines
                      - Privacy/Security
                      - USA.gov
                      - DOD Web Policy
                      - DOD Open Government
                      - Plain Language

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 09-11248.

#### Anthony Benjamin, Petitioner v. Sergeant Shepherd, et al.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 982,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 391.

178 L. Ed. 2d 810,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 869, 131 S. Ct. 168, 178 L. Ed. 2d 99, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6688.
<html>
	<head>
		<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" /><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=/stophivtogether/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fstophivtogether%2Fcampaigns%2Fprevention-is-care%2Fresources.html" />	</head>
	<body></body>
	</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7186

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES E. DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00445-REP-1; 3:08-cv-00287-REP)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James E. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED