alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

QUIXOTE CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
as of June 30, 2002

QUIXOTE CORPORATION (PARENT)

Jurisdiction
Under Which
OrganizedQuixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

DelawareTranSafe Corporation

DelawareNu-Metrics, Inc.

PennsylvaniaHighway Information Systems, Inc.

DelawareTIS, Inc.

North CarolinaNational Signal, Inc.

CaliforniaSurface Systems, Inc.

MissouriSensing Systems, Ltd.

United KingdomEnergy Absorption Systems, Inc.

DelawareE-Tech Testing Services, Inc.

DelawareSpin-Cast Plastics, Inc.

IndianaEnergy Absorption Systems (Europe), Inc.

DelawareQuixote Transportation Systems (Asia Pacific) Pty Limited

AustraliaQuixote Transportation Systems (Europe), Inc.

DelawareQuixote Research Corporation

DelawareQuixote Foreign Sales Corporation

U.S. Virgin Islands


Quixote
Transportation Safety, Inc., Quixote Research Corporation and Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation are wholly-owned by Quixote Corporation.

TranSafe
Corporation, National Signal, Inc., Surface Systems, Inc. and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. are wholly-owned by Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

All
subsidiaries listed under TranSafe Corporation, Highway Information Systems, Inc., Surface Systems, Inc. and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. are wholly-owned by those
corporations.

---

QuickLinks
No. 10-5709.

#### Camellia B. Barnes, Petitioner v. Alternative Capital Source, LLC.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 466,

178 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8072.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 47 So. 3d 280.
No. 10M56.

#### Nick A. Kolev, Petitioner v. Nissim Davidi, et al.

562 U.S. 1131, 131 S. Ct. 974,

178 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 171.

January 10, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2802 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of physical therapists in the National 

Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physical Therapist 

5 Workforce and Patient Access Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2802 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPA2 TION OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS IN LOAN RE3 PAYMENT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) MISSION OF CORPS; DEFINITION OF PRIMARY

5 HEALTH SERVICES.—Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public 

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘mental 

8 health, or physical therapy,’’. 

9 (b) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.—Section 338B of 

10 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) is 

11 amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a)— 

13 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

14 and inserting a semicolon; 

15 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

16 paragraph (3); and 

17 (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

18 following: 

19 ‘‘(2) an adequate supply of physical therapists, 

20 including physical therapists for the prevention, 

21 treatment, or management of pain for individuals 

22 with substance use disorders, or at risk of developing 

23 a substance use disorder; and’’; 

24 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

25 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2802 IH

1 (i) by striking ‘‘, or be certified’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘; be certified’’; and 

3 (ii) by inserting before the semicolon 

4 the following: ‘‘; or have a doctoral or mas5 ter’s degree in physical therapy’’; 

6 (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting 

7 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘mental health,’’; and 

8 (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 

9 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘dentistry,’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(i) ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OTHER PRO12 GRAMS.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to pro13 hibit any health care professional who is eligible to partici14 pate in the program under this section from participating 

15 in any other loan repayment program established by the 

16 Secretary for which such professional is eligible.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        35,880,799
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   8,423,473
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              44,304,272
<CASH>                                         602,537
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         747,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,820,416
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             27,172,519
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,621,571
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       330,770
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,759,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,404,190
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,312,596
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,128,663
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             324,691
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   3,643,857
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    944,162
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           646,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (468,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (468,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (468,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              24,362,806
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          3,643,857
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,508,365
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             26,498,298
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 10-7603.

#### Robert Michael Hughes, Petitioner v. John King, Warden.

562 U.S. 1188, 131 S. Ct. 1018,

178 L. Ed. 2d 843,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 740.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ MURRAY NICOL                            
|Murray Nicol                                
|Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
|May 15, 2008                                



20
#### People v Ramos

3d Dept: 135 AD3d 1234 (Albany)

denied 8/16/16 (Garcia, J.)
No. 10-7585.

#### Robby Keith Pope, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1015,

178 L. Ed. 2d 843,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 755.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2015118EN.01002701.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Costa Crociere v OHIM — Guerlain (SAMSARA)

(Case T-388/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark SAMSARA - Earlier Community word mark SAMSARA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 118/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Costa Crociere SpA (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti, S. Bergia and G. Sironi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Guerlain SA (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented by: C. Costa and M. Baccarelli, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2013 (Case R 2049/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Guerlain SA and Costa Crociere SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Costa Crociere SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Costa Crociere SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 12.10.2013.

1

---
# C_2016038EN.01001502.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/15

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-530/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Greek Casinos - System providing for a levy of 80 % of the admissions of different amounts - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Advantage - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 038/21)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Hellenic Republic (represented by K. Boskovits and P. Mylonopoulos, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


Contract Agreement


 


 


Agreement name: Liaoning North-West Water
Supply Project To Deliver Butterfly Valve (biding document 1)


Agreement Code: LXB-SG-002-Z0500


 


In order to implement biding document 1
with respect to purchase of butterfly valve for Liaoning North-West Water Supply Project , Liaoning North-West Water Supply Ltd
(“Purchaser”) accepted Liaoning Nengfa Weiye Energy Technology Ltd (“Seller” ) as the bid winner. Both
of Parties came to following agreement :


 


1. This contract agreement is consisted
of agreement and following documents:


 


(1) Contract Agreement (including supplemental
agreement)


(2) Biding Notify


(3) Summary of negotiated contract


(4) Bid Letter


(5) The biding documents to clarify and
the revised NO.01-02 Notify.


(6) Term and Condition of agreement


(7) Technical standard and requirement
(Technical term of contract)


(8) Price list of bid


(9) Material provided by purchaser


(10) Other documents entered into the contract
recognized by parities


 


2. The mentioned documents may be complementary
and explanation mutually. If it have not clear or discrepancy, a prior order as agreed in the contract shall prevail.


 


3. The price of signed contract : RMB:
53,188,290


 


4. The quality of equipment meets technical
standard and requirement


 


5. Seller guaranteed that the design ,
manufacture ,test and trial , parcel and deliver with respect to hydraulic control butterfly valves and its accessories, valve
operating system , spare part and special tool which would be completed according to term of agreement. ( deliver spot would be
located at installed spot, unload is responsible by purchaser). Acceptance : provided necessary drawings and material, provided
technical guidance and supervision services and other after-sales service regarding equipment installation, commissioning,testing
and acceptance; accepted representative participate in the factory supervision, testing and acceptance and responsible for quality
of works mentioned above.


 


6. Deliver date guaranteed by seller is
between 1 July 2014 to 31 January 2015.


 


7. The purchaser guaranteed that the payment
would be completed according to condition, schedule raised by the agreement.


 


8. There are eight copies of this agreement,
including two copies of the original contract , both sides each hold one copy, six copies , with three copies of each pair of main
contract.


 


9. In contract, both parties sign compensatory
agreement separately, the supplementary agreement is part of the contract.


 


10. This contract will come into force
after signed and stamped by parties and the purchaser accepts letter submitted by the buyer.


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


Liaoning Nengfa Weiye
Energy Technology Ltd.


 


Purchaser: Liaoning North-West Water Supply
Ltd Seller:Liaoning Nengfa Weiye Energy Technology Ltd.


 


The legal representative: Dawu Zhang            The
legal representative: Lihua Wang.


 


 


Signed date: 12 March,
2014
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-61796, 333-66646 and 333-87160) of EMS
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd. included in
or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of EMS
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                          Chartered Accountants

March 24, 2003
Ottawa, Canada
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Viking  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas B. Marsh, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2004



/s/ Thomas B. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer, President
No. 10-6633.

#### In re Gary B. Williams, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 980, 131 S. Ct. 441,

178 L. Ed. 2d 345,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8314.

October 18, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUGO RODRIGUES MACIEL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70648

Agency No. A088-447-312

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Hugo Rodrigues Maciel, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

DEC 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual

findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that even if Maciel’s asylum

application was timely, he failed to establish past persecution in Brazil based on

the threats he and his family received following a police officer’s mistaken

shooting of his brother. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.

2003) (unfulfilled threats constituted harassment, not persecution). Substantial

evidence also supports the BIA’s finding that Maciel failed to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of future harm because his mother and brother remain in Brazil

unharmed. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003); see also

Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir. 2001) (claim weakened or undercut

when similarly-situated family members remain in applicant’s home country

without incident). Accordingly, Maciel’s asylum claim fails.

Because Maciel failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily

failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.

2 12-70648
Finally, substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief

because Maciel failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured

if returned to Brazil. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-70648
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.83 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.83 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.83 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.83 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil