##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A Amendment No. 2
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 Commission File #0-6072 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 Georgia
    
    58-1035424(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (IRS Employer ID Number)
 660 Engineering Drive Norcross, Georgia
    
    30092(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (770) 263-9200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.10 par value
(Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No o Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or amendment to this Form 10-K: o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Act): Yes x No o The aggregate market value of voting stock held by persons other than directors or executive
officers on July 3, 2004 was $203 million, based on a closing price of $18.51 per share. The basis
of this calculation does not constitute a determination by the registrant that all of its directors
and executive officers are affiliates as defined in Rule 405. As of March 10, 2005, the number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding was
11,164,421 shares. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain information contained in the Companys definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the registrant is incorporated herein by reference in Part III of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1. AVAILABLE INFORMATION EMS Technologies, Inc. makes available free of charge, on or through its website at www.ems-t.com,
its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as
reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Information contained on the Companys website is not part of this report.   1 of 9




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTEPART IIITEM 9A. Controls and ProceduresPART IVITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesEX-10.3 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORSEX-10.4 OFFICER'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANEX-10.9 FORM OF STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTEX-21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTEX-23.3 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMEX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEOEX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFOEX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO & CFO    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTE EMS Technologies, Inc. (the Company) is filing this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A (the Amendment)
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (which was initially
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 16, 2005, and amended by
Amendment No. 1 thereto on March 31, 2005) pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC
(SEC Release No. 34-50754). This exemptive order permitted the Company to include managements annual
report on the Companys internal control over financial reporting and the required attestation
report of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm in an amendment to its Annual
Report on Form 10-K not later than 45 days after the prescribed period for filing such Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The Company also is refiling certain exhibits to its Report on Form 10-K.
Accordingly, the Company is filing this Amendment No. 2 to:  
    Amend Item 9A to include managements annual report on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting, and a report of its independent registered public
accounting firm relating to the Companys assessment of internal control over financial
reporting and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and
    Amend Item 15 to include (i) updated certifications pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (ii) a consent of the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm with respect to the above-referenced report on the Companys assessment of
internal controls, and (iii) certain additional or corrected exhibits. Except for the amendments described above, this Amendment No. 2 does not modify or update
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, including
the previously reported financial statements and other financial disclosures included therein,
which information has not been updated to reflect events which may have occurred since
the date as of which such information was previously provided. 
 PART II 
 ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that
the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of
the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues, errors and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and its Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2004, as defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (disclosure
controls). Based on that evaluation and the three material weaknesses (discussed below) that were
identified, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls were not
effective as of December 31, 2004. (b) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
to the Companys management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation
of published financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Management conducted its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 using the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is defined by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Boards (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2 as a control deficiency, or
combination of control deficiencies, that results in a more than remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In
the course of its evaluation, management identified the following material weaknesses as of
December 31, 2004 in the Companys internal control over financial reporting:  
    The Companys policies and procedures did not provide for sufficient oversight and review
of revenue recognition for multiple deliverables under contracts involving delayed delivery of
equipment, related software and future services that are supplemental to the primary equipment
sold. Specifically, the Company did not have controls in place to adequately identify,
evaluate and value separate elements of certain contracts involving multiple deliverables to
ensure that the related accounting for these transactions complied with the provisions of the
FASBs Emerging Issues Task 2 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, and
the AICPAs Statement of Position No. 97-02, Software Revenue Recognition.
This deficiency resulted in a material overstatement of the Companys recorded
revenue; however, the related errors were identified and corrected prior to
issuance of the Companys 2004 consolidated financial statements.  
    The Companys policies and procedures did not provide
for effective oversight and review of the accounting
for purchase price variances on certain purchased
materials. Specifically, the Company did not
maintain, in one of its divisions, procedures to
adequately review purchase price variances recognized
during the period and to reflect such variances in
the recorded amount of inventory. This deficiency
resulted in a material understatement of the
Companys cost of sales; however, the related errors
were identified and corrected prior to issuance of
the Companys 2004 consolidated financial statements.  
    The Companys policies and procedures did not provide
for effective oversight and review of the accounting
for the effect of significant foreign exchange
fluctuations on the value of long-term contracts
denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency. Specifically, the Companys discontinued
Canadian operations did not have controls in place to
appropriately estimate the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations
on the expected future revenues
for long-term contracts denominated in non-Canadian
currencies, and for which revenue was being
recognized under percentage-completion accounting.
This deficiency resulted in a material overstatement
of the Companys recorded revenue from discontinued
operations; however, the related errors were
identified and corrected prior to issuance of the
Companys 2004 consolidated financial statements. Based on the aforementioned material weaknesses, management has concluded that the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2004. KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial
statements of the Company, has issued an audit report on managements assessment of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. The report is included in Item 9A(d) under the heading
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth
quarter of 2004 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. However, subsequent to December 31, 2004, the
Company implemented additional controls and procedures to address the material weaknesses that have
been identified:  
    The Company expanded its procedures to identify, evaluate and appropriately value all
contractual deliverables, as well as provide for additional management review of certain
contracts with multiple deliverables.  
    The Company improved its procedures to revise standard prices for purchased materials,
and it implemented new procedures to revalue inventory more frequently, and to provide for
additional management review of the accounting for purchase price variances for purchased
materials.  
    The Company expanded its procedures to revalue the estimated future revenues on
long-term contracts denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. 3 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



(d) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders
EMS Technologies, Inc.: We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)), that EMS Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
because of the effect of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting
identified in managements assessment, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been
identified and included in managements assessment as of December 31, 2004:  (a)
    the Companys policies and procedures did not provide for sufficient oversight and
review of revenue recognition for multiple deliverables under contracts involving delayed
delivery of equipment, related software and future services that are supplemental to the primary
equipment sold. Specifically, the Company did not have controls in place to adequately
identify, evaluate and value separate elements of certain contracts involving 4 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



multiple deliverables to ensure that the related accounting for these transactions complied with
generally accepted accounting principles. This deficiency resulted in a material overstatement
of the Companys recorded revenue.  (b)
    the Companys policies and procedures did not provide for effective oversight and review
of the accounting for purchase price variances on certain purchased materials. Specifically,
the Company did not maintain, in one of its divisions, procedures to adequately review
purchase price variances recognized during the period and to reflect such variances in the
recorded amount of inventory. This deficiency resulted in a material understatement of the
Companys of cost of sales.  (c)
    the Companys policies and procedures did not provide for effective oversight and review of
the accounting for the effect of significant foreign exchange fluctuations on the value of
long-term contracts denominated in a currency other than the functional currency.
Specifically, the Companys discontinued Canadian operations did not have controls in place to
appropriately estimate the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations
on the expected future revenues for long-term contracts denominated in
non-Canadian currencies, and for which revenue was being recognized under
percentage-completion accounting. This deficiency resulted in a material overstatement of the
Companys recorded revenue from discontinued operations. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of EMS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004. The aforementioned material weaknesses were considered
in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004
consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 30, 2005,
which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion,
because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the
objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia
May 2, 2005 5 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



PART IV 
 ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules (a) 3. Exhibits The following exhibits are filed as part of this report: 3.1 Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of EMS Technologies, Inc., effective
March 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2004). 3.2 Bylaws of EMS Technologies, Inc., as amended through March 15, 1999 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2004). 4.1 EMS Technologies, Inc. Stockholder Rights Plan
dated as of April 6, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year
ended December 31, 2004). 4.2 Agreement with respect to long-term debt pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2000). 4.3 U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, among the Company, the lenders
from time to time party thereto, and SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year
ended December 31, 2004). 4.4 Security Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries, in favor of SunTrust Bank as Collateral Agent
(previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31,
2004). 4.5 Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries, in favor of SunTrust Bank as Collateral Agent
(previously filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31,
2004). 4.6 Form of Note issued by the Company in favor of the lenders under the U.S. Revolving Credit
Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2004 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.7 Amendment No. 1, dated February 11,
2005, to U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year
ended December 31, 2004). 4.8 Canadian Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, among EMS Technologies
Canada, Ltd., the Company, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America,
National Association (Canada Branch) as Canadian Administrative Agent and Funding Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.9 Canadian Security Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd.,
in favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as Canadian Collateral Agent
(previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.10 Deed of Movable Hypothec, dated as of December 10, 2004, by EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd., in
favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as Canadian Collateral Agent
(previously filed as Exhibit 5.0 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 6 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



4.11 Canadian Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by EMS
Technologies Canada, Ltd., in favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as
Canadian Collateral Agent
(previously filed as Exhibit 5.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.12 Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by the Company and certain of its domestic
subsidiaries in favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as Canadian
Collateral Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 5.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.13 Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by the Company and one of its
domestic subsidiaries in favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as
Canadian Collateral Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 5.3 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.14 Patent Security Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2004, by the Company and one of its
domestic subsidiaries in favour of Bank of America, National Association (Canada Branch) as
Canadian Collateral Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 5.4 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.15 Form of Note issued by the Company in favour of the lenders under the Canadian Revolving
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2004 (previously filed as Exhibit 5.5 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 4.16 Amendment No. 1, dated February 11, 2005, to
Canadian Revolving Credit Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 5.6 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the
year ended December 31, 2004). 10.1 Letter dated January 17, 2000 between the Company and Alfred G. Hansen concerning the terms of
his employment as President and Chief Operating Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). 10.2 Form of Agreement between the Company and each of its executive officers, related to certain
change-of-control events (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2001). 10.3 EMS Technologies, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective
October 1, 2003, as amended effective December 13, 2004.* 10.4 EMS Technologies, Inc. Officers Deferred Compensation Plan, effective November 13, 2003, as
amended effective December 13, 2004.* 10.5 EMS Technologies, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan as amended through October 3, 1996
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-14235
on Form S-4). 10.6 Amendments adopted May 2, 1997, to the EMS Technologies, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003). 10.7 EMS Technologies, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as adopted January 24, 1997, and amended
through May 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2004). 7 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



10.8 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted prior to 2001 to executive officers
under the EMS Technologies, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). 10.9 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted after 2000 to executive officers
under the EMS Technologies, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, together with related Terms of Officer
Stock Option, Form 1/25/01.* 10.10 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted automatically to non-employee
members of the Board of Directors upon their initial election to the Board, under the EMS
Technologies, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). 10.11 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted automatically to non-employee
members of the Board of Directors, upon each election to an additional one-year term of service,
under the EMS Technologies, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). 10.12 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted to executive officers under EMS
Technologies, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). 10.13 Form of Stock Option Agreement evidencing options granted automatically under the 1992 Stock
Incentive Plan, on a one-time basis and prior to 1998, to non-employee members of the Board of
Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000). 10.14 Stock Option Agreement dated January 7, 2000, evidencing options granted to Alfred G. Hansen
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1999). 10.15 EMS Technologies, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended through April
30, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 10.16 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003). 10.17 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and, each of Don T. Scartz and William
S. Jacobs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003). 10.18 Form of Split-Dollar Insurance Plan, dated as of June 29, 1988 between the Company and Don T.
Scartz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003). 10.19 Form of Split-Dollar Life Insurance agreement effective January 1, 1993, between the Company
and William S. Jacobs (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 10.20 Summary of compensation arrangements with non-employee members of the Board of Directors
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 10.21 Summary of compensation
arrangements with executive officers (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended
December 31, 2004). 8 of 9




---



##### Table of Contents



14 EMS Technologies, Inc. Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, as revised February 6, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003). 21.1 Subsidiaries of the registrant. * 23.1 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP) Consent to incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770, each on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-61796 and 333-87160, each on Form
S-3 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 23.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the
year ended December 31, 2004). 23.2 Independent Auditors (Ernst & Young LLP) Consent to incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770, each on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-61796 and 333-87160, each on Form
S-3 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 23.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004). 23.3 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP) Consent to incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770, each on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-61796 and 333-87160, each on Form
S-3.* 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. * 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. * 32 Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *   *
    
    Filed herewith 9 of 9