alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3. **Contract Right Not Exclusive**. The rights conferred by this Agreement shall not beexclusive of any other rights which Indemnitee may have or hereafter acquire under any statute,provision contained in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By-laws, or any agreement, orpursuant to any vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.     4. **Insurance**. The Company may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of anyIndemnitee against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Company would have the powerto indemnify the Indemnitee against that expense, liability or loss under the California GeneralCorporation Law. Indemnitee agrees to reimburse the Company for any funds paid hereunder which arepaid to Indemnitee under any such policy.     5. **Termination**. This Agreement may be amended or terminated by a writing to thateffect executed by the Company and delivered to Indemnitee; such amendment or termination shallapply only to acts or omissions of Indemnitee after such notice is delivered to Indemnitee but suchtermination shall not affect Indemnitee’s rights hereunder with respect to acts or omissionsoccurring prior thereto. Indemnitee shall not forfeit Indemnitee’s status as a beneficiary underthis Agreement by the termination of Indemnitee’s position with the Company.     6. **Saving Clause**. If this Agreement or any portion thereof shall be invalidated onany ground by any court of competent jurisdiction, the Company shall nevertheless indemnifyIndemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by any applicable portion of this Agreement that shallnot have been invalidated or by any other applicable law.     7. **Successors and Assigns**. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Company and itssuccessors and assigns.     8. **Applicable Law**. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordancewith California law.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first abovewritten.         Electro Rent Corporation, a California corporation           By:            Name:            Title:             “**Indemnitee**”                 Signature                  Print Name    
-2-
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the Annual Period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



|                         |  |                                                             
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 15, 2008 |  | /s/LESLIE J. JEZUITLeslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: September 15, 2008 |  | /s/DANIEL P. GOREYDaniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2877 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2020 

Received 

AN ACT 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2877 RDS

1 SECTION 1. E–3 VISAS FOR IRISH NATIONALS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) of the 

3 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

4 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or, on a 

5 basis of reciprocity as determined by the Secretary of 

6 State, a national of Ireland,’’ after ‘‘Australia’’. 

7 (b) EMPLOYER REQUIREMENTS.—Section 212 of the 

8 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (t) 

11 (as added by section 1(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 108– 

12 449 (118 Stat. 3470)) as subsection (u); and 

13 (2) by adding at the end of subsection (t)(1) 

14 (as added by section 402(b)(2) of Public Law 108– 

15 77 (117 Stat. 941)) the following: 

16 ‘‘(E) In the case of an attestation filed with re17 spect to a national of Ireland described in section 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii), the employer is, and will remain 

19 during the period of authorized employment of such 

20 Irish national, a participant in good standing in the 

21 E-Verify program described in section 403(a) of the 

22 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Respon23 sibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).’’. 

24 (c) APPLICATION ALLOCATION.—Paragraph (11) of 

25 section 214(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

26 U.S.C. 1184(g)(11)) is amended to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2877 RDS

1 ‘‘(11)(A) The Secretary of State may approve 

2 initial applications submitted for aliens described in 

3 section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) only as follows: 

4 ‘‘(i) For applicants who are nationals of 

5 the Commonwealth of Australia, not more than 

6 10,500 for a fiscal year. 

7 ‘‘(ii) For applicants who are nationals of 

8 Ireland, not more than a number equal to the 

9 difference between 10,500 and the number of 

10 applications approved in the prior fiscal year 

11 for aliens who are nationals of the Common12 wealth of Australia. 

13 ‘‘(B) The approval of an application described 

14 under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be deemed for nu15 merical control purposes to have occurred on Sep16 tember 30 of the prior fiscal year. 

17 ‘‘(C) The numerical limitation under subpara18 graph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens and 

19 not to the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CHEMICAL ID: FRET 09-0536

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES OF CHEMICALS IN HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS

SCENARIO #: 1 EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT 

REMOVAL

(%)

PRODUCTION 

VOLUME

(kg/yr)

HOUSEHOLD

RELEASE

DAYS

PRETREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(g/person/day)

POST-TREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(g/person/day)

BODY 

WEIGHT

(kg)

BCF

(L/kg)

70.44 1000.00 365.00 9.42E-06 2.78E-06 80.00 682.40

10th PERCENTILE DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure 

Units Drinking Water Results Fish Ingestion Results

ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)

AT

(years)

DW IR

(L/day)

FISH IR

(g/day)

Cancer

LADDpot 8.62E-09 mg/kg/day 4.22E-08 mg/kg/day 57.00 78.00 1.04 7.50

LADCpot 6.60E-07 mg/L 4.50E-04 mg/kg 57.00 78.00 NA NA

Acute

ADRpot 1.51E-07 mg/kg/day 9.49E-06 mg/kg/day NA 1 day 3.03 279.00

50th PERCENTILE DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure 

Units Drinking Water Results Fish Ingestion Results

ASSUMPTIONS

ED

(years)

AT

(years)

DW IR

(L/day)

FISH IR

(g/day)

Cancer

LADDpot 5.08E-10 mg/kg/day 2.49E-09 mg/kg/day 57.00 78.00 1.04 7.50

LADCpot 3.89E-08 mg/L 2.65E-05 mg/kg 57.00 78.00 NA NA

Acute

ADRpot 6.85E-09 mg/kg/day 4.31E-07 mg/kg/day NA 1 day 3.03 279.00
50

th PERCENTILE AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

DESCRIPTOR Harmonic Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10

STREAM DILUTION FACTOR 134.85 39.66 24.22 20.08

CONCENTRATION (μg/L) 5.32E-05 1.81E-04 2.96E-04 3.57E-04

10

th PERCENTILE AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

DESCRIPTOR Harmonic Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10

STREAM DILUTION FACTOR 7.95 1.80 1.00 1.00

CONCENTRATION (μg/L) 9.03E-04 3.99E-03 7.18E-03 7.18E-03
#### JB Wendover, LLC, Appellant, v Elizabeth S. Kirk, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 902]

In an action, inter alia, to recover for the reasonable use and occupancy of certain premises, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 9, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff owns certain residential premises in Queens County. For a time, the defendant was a tenant in those premises pursuant to a lease. At the expiration of the lease term, the defendant allegedly remained in the premises as a month-to-month tenant. Eventually, the plaintiff brought an action in Civil Court, Queens County, seeking, inter alia, to recover possession of the premises and unpaid rent. However, it discontinued that action after the defendant surrendered possession of the premises. Thereafter, the plaintiff brought the instant action in Supreme Court, Queens County, to recover, inter aha, unpaid rent for certain months. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff accepted her surrender of possession and withdrew the landlord-tenant action. The Supreme Court granted the defendant’s motion. We reverse.

The plaintiffs discontinuance of the Civil Court action against the defendant did not state that it was with prejudice. Thus, that discontinuance was without prejudice *(see*CPLR 3217 [c]), and nothing in the record indicates that the plaintiff agreed to accept possession of the premises as full settlement of the Civil Court action. Therefore, the plaintiff was not precluded from bringing the instant action *(see Herder v Clifford,*252 NY 141 [1929]; *Brown v Cleveland Trust Co.,*233 NY 399 [1922]). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
SERVED AUGUST 6,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ROSLYNE MARIE ELDER, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMSNO.FAA-2010-315 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

Counsel for the Complainant has notified me that the Federal Aviation 

Administration has withdrawn its complaint because the parties have 

reached a settlement. 

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to § 13.215 of the 

Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with 

prejudice. 

The hearing scheduled to begin on August 12, 2010 is cancelled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/ Isaac D. B^nkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Edward A. Lopez, Respondent's Former Counsel 

Venture Corporate Center 

3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 415 

Hollywood, FL 33021 

TEL: 954-241-4205 

FAX: 954-241-4206 

Roslyne Marie Elder, Respondent 

825 Sierra Vista Drive, Apt. 326 

Las Vegas, NV 89169 

TEL: 702-412-5640 

Yolandia Ayala Bemal, Complainant's Counsel 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3, YAB 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-«0.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,388
<PP&E>                                          56,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           832
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,358
<SALES>                                         52,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,618
<CGS>                                           48,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,195)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (407)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
A. Messmer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DANIEL A. MESSMER
-----------------------------
Daniel A. Messmer
Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 2007

                                       65
No. 10-294.

#### In re Ned Comer, et al., Petitioners.

562 U.S. 1133, 131 S. Ct. 902,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 287.

178 L. Ed. 2d 807,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 10-6424.

#### Robert Bates, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 532,

178 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8522.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.
No. 09-10667.

#### Robert McDonel, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 636,

178 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9044.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 523.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I,Gene W. Ray, certify that:

 

1.  Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Titan Corporation;

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: March 9,  2004 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | /s/ GENE W. RAY |
|                           |   |
|                           | Gene W. Ray |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered May 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00557-CV

CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV99-01573-V

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s motion to extend time to file docketing statement and ORDER 

the docketing statement be filed no later than May 29, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
No. 10-7517.

#### Jeremy Elliott, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 947,

178 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 279.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 42 So. 3d 239.
No. 10-651.

#### Melrose, Inc., Petitioner v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, et al.

562 U.S. 1180, 131 S. Ct. 1008,

178 L. Ed. 2d 828,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 731.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*829Same case below, 613 F.3d 380.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-37692 on Form S-8 and 333-17295 on Forms S-8 and S-3 of Electro Rent
Corporation of our report dated August 21, 2003 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change
in accounting principle), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electro
Rent Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 28, 2003


                                  Exhibit 23(A)
**EXHIBIT 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT** 1. Elk Premium Building Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of theoutstanding stock of (a) Elk Corporation of America, a Nevada corporation, (b) ElkCorporation of Alabama, a Delaware corporation, (c) Elk Corporation of Texas, a Nevadacorporation, (d) Elk Corporation of Arkansas, an Arkansas corporation, (e) Elk PerformanceNonwoven Fabrics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (f) Elk Composite Building Products, Inc.,a Delaware corporation, (g) RGM Products, Inc., a California corporation, (h) RidgemateManufacturing Co. Inc., a California corporation, and (i) Elk VersaShield BuildingSolutions, Inc., a Delaware Corporation.  2. Elk Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the outstandingstock of (a) Chromium Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (b) Elk Technologies, Inc., aDelaware corporation, (c) Midland Path Forward, Inc., a Texas corporation, formerly knownas OEL, LTD, d/b/a Ortloff Engineers, LTD, (d) Lufkin Path Forward, Inc., a Texascorporation, a successor by merger with Cybershield, Inc., Cybershield of Texas, Inc. andCybershield International, Inc.  3. Elk Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which is a general partner with a 1%partnership interest in Elk Group, L.P. (Elk Group L.P.), a Texas limited partnership.  4. NELPA, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which is a limited partner with a 99% partnershipinterest in Elk Group L.P.
# C_2015320EN.01000801.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/8

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2015 — Faci SpA v European Commission

(Case C-291/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 181 - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European tin stabilisers and epoxidised soya bean oil and esters markets - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Principle of effective judicial protection - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 320/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Faci SpA (represented by: S. Piccardo, avvocato, and S. Crosby, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, J. Norris-Usher and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Faci SpA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Faci SpA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---