Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

Controls

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual) if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $ -

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 LNB or MAT 486 $ 230,342 $ 518,607

SNCR Ctrl-2 SNCR 810 $ 544,866 $ 544,866

Table 3. NOx Control Options for Phoenix Cement (per Andover Technology Partners Table 5-6)

MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

capital $1,155,839 $3,300,783 $1,268,764 $4,569,547

Annualized Capital $109,103 $311,571 $119,762 $431,333

FOM $121,239 $207,037 $125,756 $257,787

Reagent $299,348 $209,543

Total Cost, $/year $230,342 $518,607 $544,866 $898,663

Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 486 486 810 826

$/ton reduced $474 $1,067 $673 $1,088

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $971 $1,964

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $81 $1,117

lb/hr emission rate 288 288 205 201

Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

visibility method 6, annual average background

Using dv from area with highest impact (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 3.99

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 486 $0.2 $0.5 $474 $1,067 3.29 0.70 $0.3 $0.7 1

SNCR Ctrl-2 810 $0.5 $0.5 $673 $673 2.67 1.33 $0.4 $0.4 1

(same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 5.91

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 486 $0.2 $0.5 $474 $1,067 4.66 1.25 $0.2 $0.4

SNCR Ctrl-2 810 $0.5 $0.5 $673 $673 3.67 2.24 $0.2 $0.2

Control 

Option

Unit 2 $/year

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction $/dv (millions) Control 

Option

ton/yr 

reduction

visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility 

benefit, dv

Control 

Option

ton/yr 

Controls reduction

Controls

# CIAs w/ 

improvement 

≥ 0.5 dv

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction visibility $/dv (millions)

impact, dv 

visibility 

benefit, dv
Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

visibility method 6, annual average background (this page edited from vis6.annav sheet)

Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options

Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2

CIA Base Case

LNB or 

MAT SNCR Base Case

LNB or 

MAT SNCR

brca Bryce Canyon 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03

gali Galiuro 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01

grca Grand Canyon 0.38 0.27 0.20 0.00 0.11 0.18

maza Mazatzal 0.45 0.32 0.24 0.00 0.12 0.21

moba Mount Baldy 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02

pefo Petrified Forest 0.16 0.11 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.08

pimo Pine Mountain 0.56 0.40 0.30 0.00 0.16 0.26

sagu Saguaro 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01

sian Sierra Ancha 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.04

supe Superstition 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.04

syca Sycamore Canyon 3.99 3.29 2.67 0.00 0.70 1.33

zion Zion 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.04

Total 5.91 4.66 3.67 0.00 1.25 2.24

Max 3.99 3.29 2.67 0.00 0.70 1.33

# CIAs w/  -dv ≥ 0.5 2 1 1 1 1

# CIAs with visibility improvement ≥ 0.5 dv

Table 5(a). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†

Ctrl-2

CIA MAT LNB SNCR

brca Bryce Canyon 12.1 27.3 17.0

gali Galiuro 32.9 74.1 45.4

grca Grand Canyon 2.1 4.8 3.0

maza Mazatzal 1.9 4.2 2.6

moba Mount Baldy 25.6 57.6 34.1

pefo Petrified Forest 4.7 10.6 6.7

pimo Pine Mountain 1.5 3.3 2.1

sagu Saguaro 32.9 74.1 45.4

sian Sierra Ancha 11.0 24.7 15.6

supe Superstition 9.2 20.7 13.3

syca Sycamore Canyon 0.3 0.7 0.4

zion Zion 10.5 23.6 15.1

$/dv_sum 0.2 0.4 0.2 ($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas)

$/dv_max 0.3 0.7 0.4 ($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area)

†$/dv = $ per year from Table 2 divided by visibility improvement from Table 1(a) for each control option, in millions

Class I Area

98th Percentile  -dv Change relative to base (dv)

Ctrl-1

Class I Area



Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within Phoenix Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

CIA Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions w.r.t. Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

 Change w.r.t. base (dv) Change w.r.t. base (dv) Change w.r.t. base (dv) Change w.r.t. base (dv)

Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Control -Emis (TPY) if using MAT if using LNB

brca 0.079 0.055 0.039 0.024 0.040 0.053 0.038 0.027 0.015 0.026 0.057 0.040 0.029 0.017 0.028 0.063 0.044 0.031 0.019 0.032 Base 0 $0 $0

gali 0.023 0.016 0.011 0.007 0.012 0.025 0.017 0.012 0.008 0.013 0.024 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.012 0.024 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.012 Ctrl-1 LNB or MAT 486 $230,342 $518,607

grca 0.347 0.245 0.177 0.102 0.170 0.377 0.269 0.195 0.108 0.182 0.450 0.322 0.235 0.128 0.215 0.377 0.269 0.195 0.108 0.182 Ctrl-2 SNCR 810 $544,866 $544,866

maza 0.424 0.302 0.219 0.122 0.205 0.556 0.398 0.289 0.158 0.267 0.401 0.286 0.208 0.115 0.193 0.447 0.324 0.240 0.123 0.207

moba 0.032 0.022 0.016 0.010 0.016 0.029 0.020 0.015 0.009 0.014 0.033 0.023 0.016 0.010 0.017 0.032 0.023 0.016 0.009 0.016 Table 3. NOx Control Options for Phoenix Cement (per Andover Technology Partners Table 5-6)

pefo 0.205 0.144 0.104 0.061 0.101 0.146 0.102 0.073 0.044 0.073 0.163 0.114 0.082 0.049 0.081 0.163 0.114 0.082 0.049 0.081 MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

pimo 0.572 0.407 0.296 0.165 0.276 0.592 0.434 0.322 0.158 0.270 0.459 0.330 0.242 0.129 0.217 0.558 0.401 0.296 0.157 0.262 capital ######### $3,300,783 $1,268,764 $4,569,547

sagu 0.018 0.012 0.009 0.006 0.009 0.027 0.019 0.014 0.008 0.013 0.024 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.012 0.024 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.012 Annualized Capital$109,103 $311,571 $119,762 $431,333

sian 0.065 0.044 0.031 0.021 0.034 0.071 0.049 0.036 0.022 0.035 0.077 0.054 0.039 0.023 0.038 0.072 0.051 0.037 0.021 0.035 FOM $121,239 $207,037 $125,756 $257,787

supe 0.084 0.059 0.042 0.025 0.042 0.084 0.059 0.043 0.025 0.041 0.051 0.036 0.026 0.015 0.025 0.084 0.059 0.043 0.025 0.041 Reagent $299,348 $209,543

syca 3.849 3.167 2.613 0.682 1.236 3.530 2.954 2.447 0.576 1.083 4.820 3.965 3.284 0.855 1.536 3.993 3.289 2.666 0.704 1.327 Total Cost, $/year $230,342 $518,607 $544,866 $898,663

zion 0.055 0.038 0.027 0.017 0.028 0.073 0.051 0.037 0.022 0.036 0.076 0.054 0.039 0.022 0.037 0.073 0.051 0.037 0.022 0.036 Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 486 486 810 826

$/ton reduced $474 $1,067 $673 $1,088

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $971 $1,964

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $81 $1,117

lb/hr emission rate 288 288 205 201

98th Percentile -dv 98th Percentile -dv Unit 4 $/year

2001

98th Percentile -dv 98th Percentile -dv 

2002 2003 2001-2003

Control Option
Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

Controls

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual) if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $ -

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 LNB or MAT 486 $ 230,342 $ 518,607

SNCR Ctrl-2 SNCR 810 $ 544,866 $ 544,866

Table 3. NOx Control Options for Phoenix Cement (per Andover Technology Partners Table 5-6)

MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

capital $1,155,839 $3,300,783 $1,268,764 $4,569,547

Annualized Capital $109,103 $311,571 $119,762 $431,333

FOM $121,239 $207,037 $125,756 $257,787

Reagent $299,348 $209,543

Total Cost, $/year $230,342 $518,607 $544,866 $898,663

Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 486 486 810 826

$/ton reduced $474 $1,067 $673 $1,088

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $971 $1,964

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $81 $1,117

lb/hr emission rate 288 288 205 201

Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

visibility method 6, annual average background

Using dv from area with highest impact (12 areas)

Controls

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 5.15

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 486 $0.2 $0.5 $474 $1,067 4.13 1.02 $0.2 $0.5 1

SNCR Ctrl-2 810 $0.5 $0.5 $673 $673 3.30 1.85 $0.3 $0.3 1

(same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 7.49

LNB or MAT Ctrl-1 486 $0.2 $0.5 $474 $1,067 5.80 1.69 $0.1 $0.3

SNCR Ctrl-2 810 $0.5 $0.5 $673 $673 4.51 2.98 $0.2 $0.2

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility 

benefit, dv

$/dv (millions)

Control 

Option

Unit 2 $/year

Control 

Option

# CIAs w/ 

improvement 

≥ 0.5 dv

Controls

Control 

Option

ton/yr 

reduction

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility 

benefit, dv

$/dv (millions)

ton/yr 

reduction
Phoenix Cement Plant Unit 4

visibility method 6, annual average background (this page edited from vis8.20best sheet)

Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options

Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2

Base Case LNB or MAT SNCR Base Case LNB or MAT SNCR

brca Bryce Canyon 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.04

gali Galiuro 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01

grca Grand Canyon 0.51 0.37 0.27 0.00 0.15 0.25

maza Mazatzal 0.51 0.37 0.27 0.00 0.14 0.24

moba Mount Baldy 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02

pefo Petrified Forest 0.21 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.10

pimo Pine Mountain 0.66 0.47 0.35 0.00 0.19 0.32

sagu Saguaro 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01

sian Sierra Ancha 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.04

supe Superstition 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.05

syca Sycamore Canyon 5.15 4.13 3.30 0.00 1.02 1.85

zion Zion 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.05

Total 7.49 5.80 4.51 0.00 1.69 2.98

Max 5.15 4.13 3.30 0.00 1.02 1.85

# CIAs w/ -dv ≥ 0.5 4 1 1 1 1

# CIAs with visibility improvement ≥ 0.5 dv

Table 5(a). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†

Ctrl-2

CIA MAT LNB SNCR

brca Bryce Canyon 8.5 19.2 12.4

gali Galiuro 25.6 57.6 38.9

grca Grand Canyon 1.6 3.5 2.2

maza Mazatzal 1.7 3.7 2.3

moba Mount Baldy 16.5 37.0 23.7

pefo Petrified Forest 3.7 8.4 5.3

pimo Pine Mountain 1.2 2.7 1.7

sagu Saguaro 28.8 64.8 41.9

sian Sierra Ancha 9.2 20.7 13.0

supe Superstition 7.9 17.9 11.6

syca Sycamore Canyon 0.2 0.5 0.3

zion Zion 8.5 19.2 12.1

$/dv_sum 0.1 0.3 0.2 ($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas)

$/dv_max 0.2 0.5 0.3 ($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area)

98th Percentile -dv Change relative to base (dv)

Class I Area

Ctrl-1

†$/dv = $ per year from Table 2 divided by visibility improvement from Table 1(a) for each control option, in millions

CIA Class I Area
Table 4(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within Phoenix Cement Plant

CIA

Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base

brca 0.103 0.072 0.051 0.031 0.052 0.073

gali 0.026 0.018 0.013 0.008 0.013 0.028

grca 0.488 0.345 0.249 0.143 0.239 0.512

maza 0.489 0.347 0.252 0.142 0.237 0.645

moba 0.044 0.030 0.022 0.014 0.022 0.038

pefo 0.258 0.181 0.130 0.077 0.128 0.184

pimo 0.665 0.477 0.350 0.188 0.315 0.703

sagu 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.006 0.009 0.030

sian 0.073 0.050 0.035 0.023 0.038 0.083

supe 0.095 0.066 0.047 0.029 0.048 0.095

syca 4.694 3.824 3.192 0.870 1.502 4.326

zion 0.068 0.047 0.034 0.021 0.034 0.084

2001

98th Percentile -dv Change w.r.t. base (dv) 98th Percentile 
A) Within Phoenix Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (l

Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2

0.051 0.037 0.022 0.036 0.078 0.055 0.040

0.020 0.014 0.008 0.014 0.027 0.019 0.014

0.365 0.265 0.147 0.247 0.595 0.417 0.299

0.461 0.335 0.184 0.310 0.467 0.333 0.242

0.027 0.020 0.011 0.018 0.045 0.031 0.022

0.129 0.093 0.055 0.091 0.207 0.145 0.104

0.510 0.377 0.193 0.326 0.533 0.383 0.281

0.021 0.015 0.009 0.015 0.026 0.018 0.013

0.058 0.041 0.025 0.042 0.086 0.061 0.044

0.066 0.048 0.029 0.047 0.058 0.041 0.030

3.525 2.837 0.801 1.489 5.845 4.835 3.972

0.059 0.042 0.025 0.042 0.09 0.064 0.046

98th Percentile -dv 

2002

 Change w.r.t. base (dv) 98th Percentile -dv 

2003
issions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Base Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2 Ctrl-1 Ctrl-2

0.023 0.038 0.088 0.061 0.044 0.027 0.044

0.008 0.013 0.028 0.019 0.014 0.009 0.014

0.178 0.296 0.512 0.365 0.265 0.147 0.247

0.134 0.225 0.506 0.367 0.271 0.139 0.235

0.014 0.023 0.045 0.031 0.022 0.014 0.023

0.062 0.103 0.207 0.145 0.104 0.062 0.103

0.150 0.252 0.664 0.474 0.347 0.190 0.317

0.008 0.013 0.026 0.018 0.013 0.008 0.013

0.025 0.042 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.025 0.042

0.017 0.028 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.029 0.047

1.010 1.873 5.145 4.128 3.298 1.017 1.847

0.026 0.044 0.089 0.062 0.044 0.027 0.045

 Change w.r.t. base (dv)

2001-2003

98th Percentile -dv Change w.r.t. base (dv)
lookup tables includes areas for: TEP Sundt, Catalyst Paper/Snowflake, Chemical Lime Nelson, AEPCO Apache, APS Cholla, SRP Coronado

Phoenix Cement Control scenarios Class I areas

scenarios unit 4 short abbr Class I area Class I area, medium Class I area, long state

Base Base Case band Bandelier Bandelier NM Bandelier NM NM

Ctrl-1 LNB or MAT LNB or MAT brca Bryce Canyon Bryce Canyon NP Bryce Canyon NP UT

Ctrl-2 SNCR SNCR care Capitol Reef Capitol Reef NP Capitol Reef NP UT

chir Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM AZ

chrw Chiricahua Chiricahua Wild. Chiricahua Wilderness AZ

gali Galiuro Galiuro Wild. Galiuro Wilderness AZ

gila Gila Gila Wild. Gila Wilderness NM

grca Grand Canyon Grand Canyon NP Grand Canyon NP AZ

jotr Joshua Tree Joshua Tree NP Joshua Tree NP CA

maza Mazatzal Mazatzal Wild. Mazatzal Wilderness AZ

meve Mesa Verde Mesa Verde NP Mesa Verde NP CO

moba Mount Baldy Mount Baldy Wild. Mount Baldy Wilderness AZ

pefo Petrified Forest Petrified Forest NP Petrified Forest NP AZ

pimo Pine Mountain Pine Mountain Wild. Pine Mountain Wilderness AZ

sagu Saguaro Saguaro NP Saguaro NP AZ

sape San Pedro Parks San Pedro Parks Wild. San Pedro Parks Wilderness NM

sian Sierra Ancha Sierra Ancha Wild. Sierra Ancha Wilderness AZ

supe Superstition Superstition Wild. Superstition Wilderness AZ

syca Sycamore Canyon Sycamore Canyon Wild. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness AZ

zion Zion Zion NP Zion NP UT