alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT (31)(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William L. Gipson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Empire District Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
March 3, 2008

|By: |  | /s/ William L. Gipson
|--- |  | ---------------------

|Name:  |  | William L. Gipson                    
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-7650.

#### Miguel A. Paredes, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1050,

178 L. Ed. 2d 870,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1070.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 617 F.3d 315.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              62
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      839
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   982
<PP&E>                                           1,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              864
<BONDS>                                          1,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,361
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    149
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 89
<DISCONTINUED>                                      97
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016419EN.01000602.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht — Germany) — Senatex GmbH v Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

(Case C-518/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 167, Article 178(a), Article 179 and Article 226(3) - Deduction of input tax - Invoices not showing a tax number or VAT identification number - Legislation of a Member State excluding the ex tunc correction of an invoice))

(2016/C 419/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Senatex GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 167, Article 178(a), Article 179 and Article 226(3) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the correction of an invoice in relation to a detail which must be mentioned, namely the value added tax identification number, does not have retroactive effect, so that the right to deduct value added tax exercised on the basis of the corrected invoice relates not to the year in which the invoice was originally drawn up but to the year in which it was corrected.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

1

---
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

**Client Authorization Letter**

**(TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OFFEROR)**

Dear (Client):

We are currently responding to the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation (DLA Aviation), Request For Proposal (RFP) SPE4A2-16-R-0001 for the procurement of the AF IPV GEN III.

As you know past performance has become an element of increased emphasis in DLAs acquisitions.  They are requesting that clients of companies who submit proposals in response to their RFP for the AF IPV GEN III  be contacted, and that their participation in the validation process be requested.  We, therefore, respectfully request and hereby authorize you to complete the attached Questionnaire with regards to work we have performed for you, and submit it either electronically, or by mail.  If sending electronically, the following applies:

Exchanges of source selection information between government and questionnaire respondents will be controlled by the Contracting Officer.  Email may be used to transmit such information only if the email can be sent and encrypted, and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the subject line of the email.  In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of encrypted emails, a questionnaire respondent must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption, or, a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption.  If you intend to submit your completed questionnaire via an encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated below, prior to that first submittal, in order to exchange certificates used for encryption.  To ensure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information).  Email to: Robert.Napolitano@dla.mil 

If mailing, the outside envelope must be marked as follows:  

NOTE:  TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY

The completed questionnaire should be contained in a second envelope marked with the mailing address and the following legend:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION  -  See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Mail directly to:

DLA Aviation

Attn: DSCR-ARCJ/Robert Napolitano/33H-67

8000 Jefferson Davis Hwy

Richmond, Virginia 23297**

We have identified *Mr./Ms. (Name)* of your organization as the point of contact based on their knowledge concerning our work.  Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.  Any questions may be directed to*: [NAME, PHONE NUMBER, FAX NUMBER FOR THE OFFEROR’S POINT OF CONTACT]*

Sincerely,

***[OFFEROR'S POINT OF CONTACT]***

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
No. 09-10245.

#### William Freeman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1132, 131 S. Ct. 975,

178 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 482.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to file a volume of the joint appendix under seal granted.
#### Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. v Berryman & Henigar, Inc.

1st Dept: 130 AD3d 514

denied
EPA Meeting with EHSCP July 11, 2012 EPA OUST: Liz McDermott, Cho Yi Kwan, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Tim Smith EHSCP: Julianne Barnum, Verizon Randy Moore, Verizon Barbara Patton, AT&T Grif Bond, Century

L ink Bethan y French, Beveridge & Diamond EPA staff met with representatives of the Environmental, Health and Safety Communications Panel (EHSCP) to discuss the proposed changes to the UST regulation and answered questions on the proposal

. The conversation focused on the prop osal to remove the deferral for emergency generator tanks, secondary containment testing, walkthroughs and notification requirements.
# C_2015213EN.01002103.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 April 2015 — European Commission v Ireland, intervenors: Kingdom of the Netherlands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-217/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 213/36)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
# C_2015371EN.01002301.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2015 — IOC-UK v Council

(Case T-428/13) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Right to property - Equal treatment and non-discrimination))

(2015/C 371/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd (IOC-UK) (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta, M. Gambardella, D. Sellers and N. Pilkington, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by S. Behzadi-Spencer and V. Kaye, and subsequently by V. Kaye, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2013/270/CFSP of 6 June 2013 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 156, p. 10), and, secondly, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 522/2013 of 6 June 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 156, p. 3).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd (IOC-UK) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd (IOC-UK) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 10.5 Keiser Severance Amendment


Exhibit 10.5






AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR POST-TERMINATION BENEFITS






Gap Inc. and Tom Keiser entered into an Agreement For Post-Termination Benefits (“Agreement”), dated May 31, 2012, which provides eligibility for post-termination benefits in the event of certain terminations that occur prior to February 13, 2015.   By this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby extended to apply to certain terminations, as described in the Agreement, prior to February 13, 2018.  Except as provided in this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in effect.  




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Tom Keiser                Date: May 20, 2014          
Tom Keiser


THE GAP, INC.


/s/ Glenn Murphy            Date: June 4, 2014          
By:  Glenn Murphy
       Chairman and CEO
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139078

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139078 COA: 290572 Ingham CC: 08-000129-FC MICHAEL EMMETT WOLFE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three months ended
                                                    March 31,
                                              1999            1998
                                            -------------------------
<S>                                          <C>             <C>    
       Basic:

Average shares outstanding                   804,417         477,060

Net income                                  $630,333        $153,434

Per share amount                            $    .78        $    .32


Diluted:

Average shares outstanding                   804,417         477,060

Net effect of dilutive stock options           9,030           3,270
                                            ------------------------  

Diluted shares                               813,447         480,330

Net income                                  $630,333        $153,434

Per share amount                            $    .77        $    .32
</TABLE>
No. 10-7103.

#### Cary Michael Lambrix, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1145, 131 S. Ct. 917,

178 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 544.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 39 So. 3d 260.
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB  for the period ending  December 31, 2005
(the "Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
February 11, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36674-36675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 77-110]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice Extending Time To File 
Responses

June 30, 1998.
    On May 19, 1998, a notice was issued extending until June 15, 1998 
the time to file comments on Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) 
March 31, 1998 submittal in this proceeding intended to implement 
fishery recommendations for the Potter Valley Project No. 77 that were 
jointly developed by PG&E with federal and state resource agencies (63 
FR 28502). On June 24, 1998, PG&E requested an extension of time until 
July 10, 1998 to respond to the motions to intervene and protests of 
the Sonoma County Water Agency and the Round Valley Indian Tribes. An 
answer may not be made to a protest unless otherwise ordered by the 
decisional authority (18 CFR 385.213(a)(2)). Because the Round Valley 
Tribes have submitted an alternative proposal to PG&E's proposal and 
because it may otherwise assist the Commission's deliberations in this 
matter, responses to submittals made by June 15, 1998 will be 
permitted, and the

[[Page 36675]]

period for such responses is extended to July 10, 1998.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17884 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98F-0492]


ICI PLC; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that ICI 
PLC has filed a petition proposing that the food additive regulations 
be amended to provide for the expanded safe use of N,N-bis (2-
hydroxyethyl) alkyl (C<INF>13</INF>-C<INF>15</INF>) amine as an 
antistatic agent in polypropylene homo- and copolymers intended for 
contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Waldron, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3089.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4602) has been filed by ICI PLC, c/o ICI 
Surfactants, P.O. Box 8340, Wilmington, DE 19803-8340. The petition 
proposes to amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 178.3130 
Antistatic and/or antifogging agents in food-packing materials (21 CFR 
178.3130) to provide for the expanded safe use of N,N-bis (2-
hydroxyethyl) alkyl (C<INF>13</INF>-C<INF>15</INF>) amine as an 
antistatic agent in polypropylene homo- and copolymers intended for 
contact with food.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: June 17, 1998.
Linda M. Tarantino,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 98-17877 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT (31)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gregory A. Knapp, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Empire District Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 17, 2011

By:

/s/ Gregory A. Knapp


Name:

Gregory A. KnappTitle:

Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks