alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Eaken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 20, 2004    /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                         Principal Executive Officer
                         Principal Financial Officer
# C_2015016EN.01001402.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/14

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Hunland-Trade Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Kereskedelmi Kft. v Földművelésügyi Miniszter

(Case C-356/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficiently detailed information as regards the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 016/21)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hunland-Trade Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Kereskedelmi Kft.

Defendant: Földművelésügyi Miniszter

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest környéki közigazgatási és munkaügyi bíróság (Hungary), made by decision of 16 June 2014, in Case C-356/14, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.

---
No. 10-10.

#### Michael D. Turner, Petitioner v. Rebecca L. Rogers, et al.

562 U.S. 1105, 131 S. Ct. 847,

178 L. Ed. 2d 553,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9676.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of respondents for appointment of counsel denied.
CDC Emerging Tobacco Products Communication Initiative

Coach Live Action Video – Long 

Described Audio Transcript (min:sec)

00:00 A female high school student gets up from sitting on a bleacher in the school gym next 

to her backpack facing the camera. Close up shot of a vape resting on top of the 

student’s backpack.

A logo in the upper left corner reads Empower Vape-Free Youth.

A female high school coach notices the vape on the student’s backpack on top of the 

gym bleacher.

00:04 [COACH’S INNER VOICE] “Is that a vape?”

The coach looks over at the student with concern, who is shooting a basketball in the 

gym.

00:07 The coach shakes her head and we hear the coach’s inner voice as she’s thinking.

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “OK, sound cool.”

00:08 Closeup shot of the coach’s face as she contemplates with what to say to the student.

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “Vaping won't solve your problems.”

00:10 Coach moving around and using her hands to emphasize her thoughts.

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “But you know what will? Getting more sleep, being active, and 

staying hydrated. Let hydration be your hero.”

00:21 Closeup shot of the coach laughing at herself and shaking her head.

00:24 Camera pans from the coach to show students shooting basketball hoops in the gym,

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “Ugh, now imagine saying that to a bunch of teens and 

watching them laugh.”

00:28 Multiple shots of coach’s face as she walks composing her thoughts, practicing what she 

wants to say to the student.

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “But all of that is true. It would help. I mean, they listen to me 

when I'm showing them how to shoot threes. They could take my advice for quitting 

vaping too, and maybe that's all they really need. I'm good at advice.”
00:43 Shows a basketball going through a hoop and students continuing to shoot basketballs 

at the gym hoop.

[COACH’S INNER VOICE] “I mean, I give them advice literally all the time. And it's about 

nicotine addiction...”

00:50 Frontal shot of the coach and student sitting on the bleachers next to each other. They 

are talking. 

[COACH’S VOICE] “...which is serious, can mess with your concentration and your mood, 

maybe making it harder for you to focus on your game. And there's support to help you 

quit vaping.” 

01:01 Closeup shot of the coach’s face as she speaks to the student.

[COACH’S VOICE] “Quitting isn't easy, but if anyone can do it, you can and just know 

that I am here to help whenever.” 

01:10 Frontal shot of the student and coach fist bumping. 

[STUDENT’S VOICE] “Thanks for looking out coach.” 

01:13 The coach and student sit on the gym bleachers. Video blurs, text dissolves onto screen.

[ANNOUNCER] “Step up for your students.”

Text and logo: Step up for your students. Visit CDC.gov/Vaping for more information. 

CDC logo.

01:16 [ANNOUNCER] “Talk to them about vaping. Visit CDC.gov/Vaping for more information.”

01:21 END.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board 1998 Summer Study Task Forces on Joint 
Operations Superiority in the 21st Century, and DoD Logistics 
Transformation

AGENCY: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board 1998 Summer Study Task Forces on 
Joint Operations Superiority in the 21st Century, and DoD Logistics 
Transformation will meet in closed session on August 3-14, 1998 at the 
Beckman Center, Irvine, California.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Forces will focus on how new capabilities, operational concepts, 
and different force characteristics can be developed and integrated to 
underwrite Joint Vision 2010; and focus on providing the warfighter 
with responsive logistic support across the range of missions, threats, 
and environments DoD is likely to face in the 21st Century.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been 
determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: June 30, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-17852 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2985 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that payment of 

taxes on deferred foreign income in installments shall not prevent credit 

or refund of overpayments or increase estimated taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. ESTES (for himself and Mr. SCHNEIDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that payment of taxes on deferred foreign income in 

installments shall not prevent credit or refund of overpayments or increase estimated taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INSTALLMENTS NOT TO PREVENT CREDIT OR 

4 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENTS OR INCREASE 

5 ESTIMATED TAXES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 965(h) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new paragraph: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2985 IH

1 ‘‘(7) INSTALLMENTS NOT TO PREVENT CREDIT

2 OR REFUND OF OVERPAYMENTS OR INCREASE ESTI3 MATED TAXES.—If an election is made under para4 graph (1) to pay the net tax liability under this sec5 tion in installments— 

6 ‘‘(A) no installment of such net tax liabil7 ity shall— 

8 ‘‘(i) in the case of a request for credit 

9 or refund, be taken into account as a li10 ability for purposes of determining whether 

11 an overpayment exists for purposes of sec12 tion 6402 before the date on which such 

13 installment is due, or 

14 ‘‘(ii) for purposes of sections 6425, 

15 6654, and 6655, be treated as a tax im16 posed by section 1, section 11, or sub17 chapter L of chapter 1, and 

18 ‘‘(B) the first sentence of section 6403 

19 shall not apply with respect to any such install20 ment.’’. 

21 (b) LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF INTEREST.—In the 

22 case of the portion of any overpayment which exists by 

23 reason of the application of section 965(h)(7) of the Inter24 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2985 IH

1 (1) if credit or refund of such portion is made 

2 on or before the date which is 45 days after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act, no interest shall be al4 lowed or paid under section 6611 of such Code with 

5 respect to such portion; and 

6 (2) if credit or refund of such portion is made 

7 after the date which is 45 days after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act, no interest shall be allowed 

9 or paid under section 6611 of such Code with re10 spect to such portion for any period before the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 

14 14103 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The subsidiaries of the Company as of October 28, 2005 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                                                Incorporation
------------------                                               ---------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Advanced Input Devices, Inc.                                     Delaware
   Memtron Technologies Co.                                      Delaware
   Advanced Input Devices (UK) Ltd.                              England
   LRE Medical GmbH                                              Germany
   Esterline Input Devices (Shanghai) Ltd.                       China

Armtec Defense Products Co.                                      Delaware
   Armtec Countermeasures Co.                                    Delaware

Auxitrol Technologies S.A.                                       France
   Auxitrol S.A.                                                 France
   Auxitrol Co.                                                  Delaware

BVR Technologies Co.                                             Delaware

Hytek Finishes Co.                                               Delaware

Kirkhill - TA Co.                                                California

Korry Electronics Co.                                            Delaware
   AVISTA Incorporated                                           Wisconsin
   Palomar Products, Inc.                                        Delaware

Leach International Corporation                                  Delaware

Leach International Europe S.A.                                  France

Mason Electric Co.                                               Delaware

Muirhead Aerospace Limited                                       England

Weston Aerospace Ltd.                                            England
   Norwich Aero Products Ltd.                                    New York
   Pressure Systems, Inc.                                        Virginia
</TABLE>

The above list excludes certain subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of
October 28, 2005.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 4, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: August 27, 2014, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 27, 

2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The purpose of the 

call was to answer questions regarding the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The 

Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Mark A. Smith

Toni Gargas

John Smith

Josh Tapp

Becky Weber

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Catherine Fitzsimmons

Christine Paulson

Jason Marcel

Marnie Stein

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment

Melissa Weide

Miles Stotts

Lynn Deahl

Tom Gross

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

Mark Leath

Emily Wilbur

Paul Meyers

Julia Katich
Nebraska Department of Environmental 

Quality

Adam Yarina

Shelley Schneider

Katie Gutierrez

Brian Kozisek
No. 10-6666.

#### Billy Joe Collins, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 540,

178 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8442.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 405.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2939 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2939

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain 
                          taxes and revenues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2019

    Mrs. Napolitano (for herself, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. David Scott of 
   Georgia, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Rouda, Mr. Carbajal, and Mr. Garamendi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the use of certain 
                          taxes and revenues.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local General Sales Tax 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF REVENUES.

    (a) Written Assurances on Use of Revenue.--Section 47107(b) of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by striking ``local 
        taxes'' and inserting ``local excise taxes'';
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ``State tax'' and 
        inserting ``State excise tax''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) This subsection does not apply to State or local general 
sales taxes nor to State or local generally applicable sales taxes.''.
    (b) Restriction on Use of Revenues.--Section 47133 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) 
        by striking ``Local taxes'' and inserting ``Local excise 
        taxes'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``local taxes'' and 
        inserting ``local excise taxes'';
            (3) in subsection (c) by striking ``State tax'' and 
        inserting ``State excise tax''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Limitation on Applicability.--This subsection does not apply 
to--
            ``(1) State or local general sales taxes; or
            ``(2) State or local generally applicable sales taxes.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-7641.

#### Barry Emmett, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1049,

178 L. Ed. 2d 869,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 930.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 321.
No. 09-11044.

#### Xiao Qing Liu, Petitioner v. Richline Group, et al.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 981,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 45.

178 L. Ed. 2d 810,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 860, 131 S. Ct. 134, 178 L. Ed. 2d 81, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5957.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6700

VICTOR WARDELL WRIGHT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv - 03035

- DKC ; 8:19

- cv - 01874

- DKC )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Victor Wardell Wright , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Victor Wardell Wright seeks to app eal the district court’s order placing his case in abeyance pending resolution of United States v. Proctor , No. 19

- 7071 . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S .C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Wright seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this disposition, we deny Wright’s motion to amend. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 2-76455, 33-50528, 333-20843, 333-32425, 333-35842, 333-86973 and
333-74770) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-131042 and 333-131719) of EMS Technologies,
Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2004, except with respect to note 3 (b) and
21 as to which the date is January 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd. incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of EMS Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2003. We also consent to the use of our report dated January 6,
2006 relating to Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts of EMS
Technologies Canada, Ltd as of and for the period ended December 31, 2003.

March 31, 2006                                           Ernst & Young LLP
Ottawa, Canada                                           Chartered Accountants