alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                       Subsidiaries of Acterna Corporation

Name of Parent or Subsidiary Organization*  State or Other Jurisdiction
------------------------------------------  ---------------------------

Acterna Corporation (Parent) ......................  Delaware
Acterna LLC .......................................  Delaware
AIRSHOW, Incorporated .............................  Delaware
daVinci Systems, Inc ..............................  Delaware
Itronix Corporation ...............................  Delaware
TTC International Holdings, Inc. ..................  Delaware
Applied Digital Access, Inc .......................  Delaware
Acterna Argentina SA ..............................  Argentina
Acterna Asia Pacific Pty ..........................  Australia
Acterna Do Brasil Ltda ............................  Brazil
Acterna Canada Ltd. ...............................  Canada
Acterna Corporation Ltd ...........................  England
Acterna Plymouth Ltd. .............................  England
Itronix UK, Ltd. ..................................  England
Acterna France, S.A.R.L. ..........................  France
TTC Telecommunications France SARL ................  France
Acterna Optical S.A.S .............................  France
Acterna Deutschland, GMBH .........................  Germany
Acterna Eningen, GMBH .............................  Germany
Acterna Munchen GMBH ..............................  Germany
Acterna International GMBH ........................  Germany
Acterna Holdings, Ltd. ............................  Guernsey, Channel Islands
Acterna Investments, Ltd. .........................  Guernsey, Channel Islands
Acterna Italia SRL ................................  Italy
Acterna Japan K.K. ................................  Japan
Acterna R&D Japan, K.K. ...........................  Japan
Acterna de Mexico SA de CV ........................  Mexico
Wandel & Goltermann Telektronik BV ................  Netherlands
Acterna Espana S.A. ...............................  Spain
Acterna Nordic AB .................................  Sweden
Acterna Schweiz AG ................................  Switzerland
Acterna Zurich, S.A. ..............................  Switzerland


*Excludes nonmaterial subsidiaries.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# /yvsv?

COA# 02-12-00638-CR 

### OFFENSE: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 

## STYLE: grimaldo,gilbert COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 297th District Court DATE: 9/18/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1243882D



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: GRIMALDO, GILBERT v. 

## P*0 SB Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: 

## &/J")ijSS& rfS UtOT/rnei«/ JUDGE: 

# DATE: ^////<Z0/£ SIGNED: PC: 

# JUDGE: 'fei^ btsUA^s PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

time and DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 31, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC., 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16858 Filed 6-19-98; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0333

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: JEFFERY PATRICK HEENAN,

Petitioner and Appellant, and SARAH KATE WALLACE,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable John W. Parker , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2021

01/20/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0333
No. 10-530.

#### Nawab Munir Ul Haq, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 831,

178 L. Ed. 2d 558,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9745.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 411.
Opinion filed April 4, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00284-CR

__________

LENDON M. DUKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court

Dawson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-7173

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Lendon M. Duke entered an open plea of guilty to four counts of indecency with a child. 

After accepting appellant’s plea of guilty and receiving evidence pertaining to punishment, the 

trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for a term of fifty years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is 

supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record 

and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has 
2

provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record 

and file a response to counsel’s brief. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 

S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).

Appellant has filed a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and supporting 

brief. In addressing an Anders brief and pro se response, a court of appeals may only determine 

(1) that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the 

record and finds no reversible error or (2) that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the 

cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues. Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409. 

We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant that he may file a petition 

for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review 

by that court. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4 (“In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on 

appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the 

opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a pro se petition for 

discretionary review under Rule 68.”). Likewise, this court advises appellant that he may file a 

petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

April 4, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.O.M.  Medical  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company"),  on form 10-QSB for the period  ending  November 30, 2003,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Tanya Sedlacek,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


January 14, 2004                          By:  /s/ Tanya Sedlacek
                                               -----------------------
                                               Tanya Sedlacek
                                          Its: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33382-33383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.

    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 22, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 AM to 10:30 AM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Parklawn Building, Room 9-105, Rockville, MD 20857, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Henry J. Haigler, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 9-
105, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-7216.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 23, 1998.
    Time: 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Ave, Palladian West, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Ron Schoenfeld, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Parklawn Building, 5600

[[Page 33383]]

Fishers Lane, Room 9-101, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-3936.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-16236 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Mighty, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 904]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J.), rendered July 7, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, affirmed.

Although we do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Friedman, J.P, Richter, Andrias, Gische and Moulton, JJ.
# C_2014395EN.01006302.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/63

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 1 October 2014 — DF v Commission

(Case F-91/13) (1)

((Civil service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Travel expenses - Secondment of the applicant in a country of which he is a national - Condition set out in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations))

(2014/C 395/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DF (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents, and subsequently by J. Currall, acting as Agent)

Re:

An application for annulment of the decision to request from the applicant the reimbursement of the expatriation allowance and the travel expenses which he received during his posting in Germany, between 1 September 2009 and 31 August 2012, and an application for reimbursement of the sums already deducted and for the grant of damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay DF the sum of EUR 1 500 in compensation for non-material harm suffered by him; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay DF the sum of EUR 1 500 in compensation for non-material harm suffered by him;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay one quarter of the costs incurred by DF; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay one quarter of the costs incurred by DF;

| 4. | Declares that DF is to bear three quarters of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that DF is to bear three quarters of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14/12/2013, p. 40.

---
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 84

CRAIG W. STEWART * September Term, 20 20

CORRECTED ORDER

Upon conside r at ion of th e J o int Petition of the Attorney Gr ievance Commission of

Maryland and the Respondent, Craig W . Stewart

, to inde finitely suspend the Respon dent

from the practice of law for vi olations of 19

- 301

. 15(a )

, 19

- 308.4(d) and 1 9

- 410(c) of the

Maryland Attorne ys ’ Rules of Professional Conduct

, it is this 7 th day of April

, 202 1

O RDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Craig W.

Stewart , be

, a nd hereby is

, indefinitely suspended from th e practice of law in the State of

Maryland ; and it is furthe r

ORDERED

, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the nam e of Cr aig W. Stewart

from the register o f attorneys in th is Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client

Protecti on Fund of the Bar of M aryland and all Clerks of all judicial tr ibunals in this State in

accordance with Maryland R ule 19

- 761

.

/s/ Robert N. M cDonald

Senior J udgeThe correction notice (s) for this opinion (s) can be found here:

https://mdcourts.gov/ sites/default/files/import/appellate/correctionnotices/coa/84a20agcn.pdf
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert Mathews, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking Systems, Inc.







Date: August 7, 2009
/s/ Robert MathewsRobert MathewsChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2015320EN.01002602.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/26

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 July 2015 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Unibail Management

(Joined Cases C-512/14 P and C-513/14 P) (1)

1

(2015/C 320/39)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.

1

---
No. 10-7252.

#### Aston Baker, Petitioner v. Charles Simpson, et al.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 928,

178 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 533.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 346.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36365-36366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Parts 40 and 41

[Public Notice 2800]


Documentation of Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as Amended--Place of Application

AGENCY: Bureau of Consular Affairs, DOS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms as a final rule the interim rule 
published on January 7, 1998, that establishes the venue for a 
nonimmigrant visa application by an applicant whose previous 
nonimmigrant visa has been voided due to an overstay of an authorized 
period of admission. This

[[Page 36366]]

notice also contains a correction of a citation in the interim rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 6, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Edward Odom, Chief, Legislation and 
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington, 
DC 20520-0106, (202) 663-1204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An interim rule implementing the new 
subsection 222(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and 
requesting comments, was published on January 7, 1998 [63 FR 669]. The 
period for comments has expired; no comments have been received. The 
rule will thus stand as originally published, with a correction of the 
reference to INA 214(k) in 22 CFR 41.101(c)(1) which should read 
214(l). As there are now two 214(l)'s in the INA, this reference is to 
the first one, i.e., the subsection relating to a waiver of the 2-year 
foreign residence requirement.
    As the final regulation is identical to the interim regulation 
other than for the correction of a citation, it is not being reprinted 
in full herein.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41

    Aliens, Nonimmigrants, Passports, Visas.

    In view of the foregoing, the interim rule amending 22 CFR parts 40 
and 41 which was published at 63 FR 669 on January 7, 1998, is adopted 
as a final rule with the following change:

PART 41--[CORRECTED]

    1. The authority citation for part 41 continues to read:

    Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104.


Sec. 41.101  [Corrected]

    2. In Sec. 41.101(c)(1), correct the reference to ``INA 214(k)'' to 
read ``INA 214(l)''.

    Dated: May 20, 1998.
Donna J. Hamilton,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-17735 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
Exhibit 23.2


  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our reports dated May 16, 2005, accompanying
the consolidated financial statements, schedule and
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting included in the Annual
Report of Ennis, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year ended February 28, 2005. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Ennis, Inc. and subsidiaries on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-43087, 333-38100, 333-44624, 333-
58963 and 333-119845).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Dallas, Texas
May 16, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,156
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               398,208
<PP&E>                                          62,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           491
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,673
<SALES>                                      1,345,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,345,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,280,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,601
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,895
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57



</TABLE>