alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014253EN.01007001.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/70

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Rihn v Europol

(Case F-67/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the CEOS to members of the staff of Europol - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract as a member of the temporary staff - Refusal to grant a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the temporary staff))

2014/C 253/98

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Rihn (The Hague, the Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: initially, J. Arnould and D. Neumann, Agents, then J. Arnould, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision not to renew the applicant’s fixed-term contract.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Rihn to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Rihn to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21/9/2013, p. 31.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18424]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Announcement of Senior Fellowship Competition

AGENCY: United States institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The agency is soliciting applications for Senior Fellowships 
from scholars or practitioners who conduct research related to the 
peaceful resolution of international conflict. Fellowship entails 
residence at agency in Washington, DC, for up to one year beginning 
September 1, 1999.

DATES: Application Material Available Upon Request Receipt Date for 
Return of Applications: October 1, 1998 Notification of Awards; April, 
1999.

ADDRESSES: For application materials, visit the Institute's website at 
www.usip.org, or contact: United States institute of Peace, Jennings 
Randolph Program, 1550 M Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005-
1708, (202) 429-6063 (fax), (202) 457-1719 (TTY), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ff5edefedf0f8edfef2dfeaecf6efb1f0edf8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670d151715080015060a2712140e1749081500">[email protected]</span></a> 
(email).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennings Randolph Program, Phone (202)-429-3886.

    Dated: July 7, 1998.
Bernice J. Carney,
Director, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-18424 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 10-7536.

#### Sean Forehand, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 947,

178 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 403.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 174.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Baze, Petitioner,*

No. 91763-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44168-3-II, March 31, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1038. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I in August 
1998.
    Summaries of the meetings and rosters of the members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA, 
Office of Policy and Program Coordination, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Policy, and Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 301-443-7390.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meetings listed below.
    The meetings will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
Accordingly, these meetings are concerned with matters exempt from 
mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App.2, 
Sec. 10(d).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Dates: August 3-7, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: August 3-6, 1998 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; August 7, 1998 
9:00 a.m.-adjournment.
    Panel: Center for Mental Health Services Statewide Family 
Network Grants SM 98-014.
    Contact: George T. Lewis, Ph.D., Review Administrator, Room 17-
89, Parklawn Building, Telephone 301-443-9919; FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Dates: August 4-5, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: August 4, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; August 5, 1998, 
9:00 a.m.-Adjournment.
    Panel: Center for Mental Health Services National TA Centers SM 
98-012.
    Contact: Barbara Bates, Review Administrator, Room 17-89, 
Parklawn Building, Telephone: 301-443-9919 and FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Committee: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Dates: August 6-7, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: August 6, 1998--8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; August 7, 1998--
8:30 a.m.-adjournment.
    Panel: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Cooperative 
Agreements to Study Women with Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health 
(ADM) Disorders Who Have Histories of Violence TI 98-004 
(Coordinating Centers).
    Contact: Allen Smith, Review Administrator, Room 17-89, Parklawn 
Building, Telephone: 301-443-2595; FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Dated: July 1, 1998.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-18046 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Adrain Ma, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Emerson Radio Corp.(“annual report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information: and
30

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:July 31, 2007              /s/ Adrian Ma   Adrian Ma   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to EmersonRadio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
31
No. 10-7981.

#### Jerry L. Harris, Petitioner v. Scott Frakes, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex.

562 U.S. 1205, 131 S. Ct. 1056,

178 L. Ed. 2d 873,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1005.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 390.
No. 10-6749.

#### Jermaine Archer, Petitioner v. Philip Heath, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 611,

178 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8857.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 619 F.3d 187.
nh3y_combined 10/6/2010

Page 1

REGION STATE COUNTY SCC DESC NH3

31043 Nebraska Dakota Co 2302080002 Industrial Proc 939.55

31055 Nebraska Douglas Co 2302080002 Industrial Proc 942.23

31109 Nebraska Lancaster Co 2630020000 Waste Disposa 0.5896

31119 Nebraska Madison Co 2302080002 Industrial Proc 558.21
No. 10-7836.

#### Hayel Abdallah Ali Jaber, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 971,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 243.

178 L. Ed. 2d 798,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 602.
No. 10-7518.

#### Raymond Larry Carrasco, Petitioner v. Scott Kernan, Warden.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1010,

178 L. Ed. 2d 839,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 778.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 362.
Agenda Date: October 8, 2015 

Prepared By: John Finnell, Manager, Permitting and Engineering 

Topic: Amendment to Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines 

Action Requested: 

1) Conduct a Public Hearing regarding the proposed approval of amended Rule 250, 

Stationary Gas Turbines. 

2) Adopt Resolution #15-09 (Attachment #2), thereby approving amended Rule 250, 

Stationary Gas Turbines, and the findings in the Staff Report (Attachment #1). 

Discussion: Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines, applies to all stationary gas turbines rated 0.3 

megawatts (MW) and larger. Currently, there are two facilities, Roseville Energy Park and 

City of Roseville Power Plant #2, subject to this rule.

This rule amendment was prompted by a notification by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (U.S. EPA) that Rule 250 did not meet current Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) requirements. This finding was provided as a result of the U.S. EPA’s 

review of the District’s 2014 RACT SIP Analysis Report. 

EPA recommended that the District add limits during startup and shutdown, update the rule 

standards, and eliminate outdated references and definitions. 

The most notable proposed changes are: 

 The exemptions for pipeline and chemical processing gas turbines have been removed. 

 References to efficiency have been removed from the rule standards, as they are no 

longer required. 

 Limits during start-up and shutdown periods have been added for both simple cycle gas 

turbines and for combined cycle gas turbines. 

Fiscal Impact: The amendments do not incur any additional costs for the District. The 

amendments are not expected to incur any new costs for existing regulated sources. 

Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution #15-09, (Attachment #2), thereby 

approving amended Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines, and the findings in the Staff Report 

of Attachment #1. 

Attachments: #1. Staff Report, Amendment to Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbine 

#2. Resolution #15-09, Approval of an Amendment of the Placer County Air 

Pollution Control District’s Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines, and 

Exhibit 1, Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines 

Board Agenda Item #2

Public Hearing/Action 
ATTACHMENT #1 

SUBJECT 

Staff Report: Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines 
ATTACHMENT #2 

SUBJECT 

Resolution #15-09 

Approval of an Amendment of the 

Placer County Air Pollution Control District’s 

Rule 250, Stationary Gas Turbines
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for
the period ending January 1, 2000 for Grove Worldwide LLC and subsidiaries, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          37,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,967)
<INVENTORY>                                    191,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360,253
<PP&E>                                         252,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,058)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 848,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          198,600
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   848,175
<SALES>                                        179,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,076
<CGS>                                          149,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (116)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          302
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,994)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4768



# 

W INFREEB ONNER , J R ., a/k/a Stinka,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-02-120)
Submitted: February 20, 2003

Decided: March 3, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL

Reuben V. Greene, ROBERT WALKER & ASSOCIATES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Stephen W. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION

PER CURIAM:Winfree Bonner, Jr., pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and was sentenced to 150 months’ imprisonment. Bonner’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but raises an issue regarding Bonner’s career offender enhancement. Bonner has filed his own supplemental brief in which he contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. In accordance with the requirements of Anders
, we have considered the briefs on appeal and examined the entire record for meritorious issues. We find no error and dismiss. The record on appeal discloses that Bonner waived his right to appeal in his plea agreement. This court reviews the validity of a waiver of appellate rights de novo. United States v. Marin , 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). At his Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, Bonner was fully advised of the consequences of his plea, and he represented to the court that he understood the plea agreement, the charge to which he was pleading guilty, and the possible penalties he faced at sentencing. Bonner further stated during the Rule 11 hearing that he fully understood the waiver of his right to appeal his sentence. We therefore find the plea agreement valid and enforceable. Because Bonner validly waived his right to appeal and because his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum, we decline to address the issues raised in counsel’s Anders brief and in Bonner’s pro se supplemental brief. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel maymove in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ONNER
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16928]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (98-3)]

Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the third quarter 1998 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The third quarter 1998 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.998. 
The third quarter 1998 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.629. The third quarter 1998 
RCAF-5 is 0.626.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 565-1549. TDD 
for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Suite 210, 1925 
K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423-0001, telephone (202) 289-4357. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
(202) 565-1695.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: June 18, 1998.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16928 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```
Subject: Previcur Flex Fungicide, EPA Reg. No. 264-678 

 Data Requirements in Support of Propamocarb Use on Potatoes 

 

Dear Ms. Scheltema: 

In the Agency’s Propamocarb Hydrochloride Registration Review Initial Docket dated 

September, 2011 (Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0662), the following studies were listed 

as data previously identified by the Agency as needed in support of propamocarb use on 

potatoes: 

1. GDLN 860.1360 – Multi-residue testing, 2-hydroxy and glucuronide metabolites. 

2. GDLN 860.1380 – Storage stability for livestock commodities, glucuronide metabolite. 

As per the Docket Summary Document, EPA granted a conditional use of propamocarb on 

potatoes, extended to March 31, 2012. A Storage Stability study of propamocarb glucuronide in 

animal matrices was previously submitted to the Agency on January 28, 2005 (MRID 

46458801). A copy of the Multi-residue testing report is enclosed in response the remaining data 

requirement listed above. This should fulfil the data requirements previously identified as needed 

in support of propamocarb use on potatoes. 

Document Processing Desk 

Office of Pesticide Programs (7502P) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Room S4400 

One Potomac Yard 

2777 S. Crystal Drive 

Arlington, VA 22202 

Attention: Christina Scheltema, Registration Review 

Division 

March 29, 20l2 

Bayer CropScience 

2 T.W. Alexander Drive 

P. O. Box 12014 

RTP, NC 27709 

Phone: (919) 549-2000

 
Page 2 of 2

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at (919) 

549-2631 or by e-mail at jessica.fernandez@bayer.com. 

Sincerely, 

Jessica Fernandez 

Registration Manager 

Cc: Mary Waller, Product Manager (21)
#### *State, Respondent, v. Harvey, Petitioner,*

No. 87290-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 29513-3-III, May 6, 2014, 181 Wn. App. 1004. *Denied*January 7, 2016.
No. 10-6668.

#### Cary Kerr, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 907,

178 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 493.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 400.