alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016027EN.01004101.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2015 — Abertis Telecom and Retevisión I v Commission

(Case T-541/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Digital television - Aid for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas in Spain - Decision declaring aid to be partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market - Advantage - Service of general economic interest - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - New aid - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 027/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Abertis Telecom, SA (Barcelona, Spain) and Retevisión I, SA (Barcelona) (represented by: initially L. Cases Pallarès, J. Buendía Sierra, N. Ruiz García, A. Lamadrid de Pablo, M. Muñoz de Juan and M. Reverter Baquer, then L. Cases Pallarès, J. Buendía Sierra, A. Lamadrid de Pablo and M. Reverter Baquer, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: SES Astra (Betzdorf, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. González Díaz, F. Salerno and V. Romero Algarra, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2014/489/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 [(C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/010, ex CP 163/2009)] implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas (other than Castilla-La Mancha) (OJ 2014 L 217, p. 52).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by SES Astra. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by SES Astra.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
# C_2013108EN.01003102.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/31

---

Action brought on 7 February 2013 — Red Bull/OHIM — Sun Mark (BULLDOG)

(Case T-78/13)

2013/C 108/79

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck and I. Fowler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sun Mark Ltd (Middlesex, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2012 in Case R 0107/2012-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2012 in Case R 0107/2012-2; and

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if they join as intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if they join as intervener.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BULLDOG’, for goods in classes 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 9 215 567

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and international trade mark registrations of the word mark ‘BULL’ and ‘RED BULL’ for goods in classes 32 and 33

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and (5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with this annual report of Espey Mfg. &  Electronics  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  June 30,  2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, David
O'Neil,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: September 8, 2009


                                      /s/David O'Neil
                                      ----------------------------
                                      David O'Neil
                                      Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer



                                       35
# C_2013207EN.01006101.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/61

---

Action brought on 8 May 2013 — ZZ v EESC

(Case F-42/13)

2013/C 207/105

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to terminate the applicant’s employment contract and the application to compensate her for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 16 October 2012 adopted by the Secretary-General of the EESC, as the Authority empowered to conclude contracts, to terminate the applicant’s contract; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 16 October 2012 adopted by the Secretary-General of the EESC, as the Authority empowered to conclude contracts, to terminate the applicant’s contract;

| — | if necessary, annul the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of 31 January 2013 confirming the termination of the applicant’s contract and the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of 24 April 2013 specifically rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, annul the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of 31 January 2013 confirming the termination of the applicant’s contract and the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of 24 April 2013 specifically rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| — | pay compensation in respect of the material damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

pay compensation in respect of the material damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | grant the applicant the sum fixed on equitable grounds and provisionally at EUR 150 000 for non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the applicant the sum fixed on equitable grounds and provisionally at EUR 150 000 for non-material damage suffered;

| — | order the EESC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EESC to pay the costs.

---
# C_2013101EN.01002002.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/20

---

Action brought on 24 January 2013 — Pedro Group/OHIM — Cortefiel (PEDRO)

(Case T-38/13)

2013/C 101/44

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pedro Group Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: B. Brandreth, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cortefiel, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul partially the Fourth Board of Appeal’s Decision of 26 November 2012 (Case R 0271/2011-4): Annulment of that part of the Decision that annulled part of the decision of the Opposition Division dated 17 December 2010 and rejected the Applicant’s CTM application for certain goods in class 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul partially the Fourth Board of Appeal’s Decision of 26 November 2012 (Case R 0271/2011-4): Annulment of that part of the Decision that annulled part of the decision of the Opposition Division dated 17 December 2010 and rejected the Applicant’s CTM application for certain goods in class 25;

| — | Order that the respondent pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the respondent pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PEDRO’, for goods and services in classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 7 541 857

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 1 252 899 of the figurative mark in black and white ‘Pedro del Hierro’ for goods and services in classes 3, 9, 14, 18, 25, 35, and 42 and the International registration No 864 740 claimed to have effect in Bulgaria, Spain and Romania for the figurative mark in black and white ‘Pedro del Hierro’ for goods and services in classes 3, 14, 25 and 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision as far as it rejected the opposition for goods in class 25, rejected the application for these goods and dismissed the appeal for the remainder

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 15 and 42(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2924 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the Supportive Services 

for Veteran Families Grant Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2019 

Mr. LEVIN of California (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the 

Supportive Services for Veteran Families Grant Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing for Women 

5 Veterans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2924 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AMOUNT FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 

2 FOR VETERAN FAMILIES GRANT PROGRAM 

3 TO SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE A 

4 FOCUS ON PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO 

5 WOMEN VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES. 

6 Section 2044(e) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 

9 following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(H) $400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

11 2020 through 2022.’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(4) Not less than $20,000,000 shall be avail15 able under paragraph (1)(H) for the provision of fi16 nancial assistance under subsection (a) to organiza17 tions that have a focus on providing assistance to 

18 women veterans and their families.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. GAP ANALYSIS OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF20 FAIRS PROGRAMS THAT PROVIDE ASSIST21 ANCE TO WOMEN VETERANS WHO ARE HOME22 LESS. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

24 shall complete an analysis of programs of the Department 

25 of Veterans Affairs that provide assistance to women vet26 erans who are homeless or precariously housed to identify 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2924 IH

1 the areas in which such programs are failing to meet the 

2 needs of such women. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

5 to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 

6 the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Rep7 resentatives a report on the analysis completed under sub8 section (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of The Titan Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237
<INVENTORY>                                     13,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,814
<PP&E>                                          43,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,699
<BONDS>                                         40,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,695
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,848
<SALES>                                        137,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,722
<CGS>                                          110,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
# C_2016156EN.01000601.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — HeidelbergCement AG v European Commission

(Case C-247/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Market for ‘cement and related products’ - Administrative procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 18(1) and (3) - Decision requesting information - Statement of reasons - Clarification of the application))

(2016/C 156/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: HeidelbergCement AG (represented by: U. Denzel, C. von Köckritz and P. Pichler, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, L. Malferrari and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in HeidelbergCement v Commission (T-302/11, EU:T:2014:128); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in HeidelbergCement v Commission (T-302/11, EU:T:2014:128);

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2361 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2361 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by HeidelbergCement AG with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-302/11 and the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by HeidelbergCement AG with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-302/11 and the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
¿Tiene alguno de estos síntomas?

• Tos, dificultad para respirar 

o dolor en el pecho.

• Náuseas, vómitos, dolor 

abdominal, o diarrea.

• Fiebre, escalofríos o pérdida 

de peso. 

¿Usa productos de cigarrillos 

electrónicos o vapeo? 

Si respondió SÍ a estas preguntas, asegúrese de hablar 

con su médico sobre sus síntomas y de decirle que usted 

usa productos de cigarrillos electrónicos o vapeo.

PARA OBTENER MÁS INFORMACIÓN:

VISITE WWW.CDC.GOV/LESIONESPULMONARES O LLAME AL 1-800-CDC-INFO. 

SOLO PARA IMPRIMIR CS311310-B MLS313623 11/27/2019
No. 10-573.

#### Shepherd Montessori Center Milan, Petitioner v. Ann Arbor Charter Township, et al.

562 U.S. 1137, 131 S. Ct. 928,

178 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 96,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 486 Mich. 311, 783 N.W.2d 695.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.36 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.36 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.36 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.36 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 10-6505.

#### Ben Alan Snipes, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 609,

178 L. Ed. 2d 443,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8955.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.