alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

J.D.R., )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5525

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 16, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Sherwood Coleman, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheets and the  statements of income of Heritage  Bancorp,
Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,955,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    22,991,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        29,965,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                    431,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 60,353,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     48,872,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,595,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            80,000
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,295,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,750,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 60,353,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,391,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              675,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               145,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,211,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             726,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             726,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,485,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  13,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             1,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,390,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     225,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   126,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,077,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               429,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  20,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   9,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              431,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        431,000


</TABLE>
# C_2013359EN.01001503.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/15

---

Action brought on 30 September 2013 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz/OHMI — Yves Saint Laurent (handbags)

(Case T-525/13)

2013/C 359/30

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yves Saint Laurent SAS (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the defendant’s Third Board of Appeal of 8 July 2013 in case R 207/2012-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the defendant’s Third Board of Appeal of 8 July 2013 in case R 207/2012-3;

| — | declare the registered Community design No. 613294-0001 invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the registered Community design No. 613294-0001 invalid;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal;

| — | furthermore, in case the other party intervenes in this case, order Yves Saint Laurent SAS to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

furthermore, in case the other party intervenes in this case, order Yves Saint Laurent SAS to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: A design for the product ‘Handbags’ — registered Community design No 613294-0001.

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Lack of individual character based on Article 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7254.

#### Javier Lopez Calderon, Petitioner v. Gary Swarthout, Warden.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 929,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 486.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIRST QUARTER FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         74
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,801
<PP&E>                                           6,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,355
<BONDS>                                          2,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84<F3>
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
<F3>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        3
        
        4
        
        5
        
        6 (current)
        
        7
        

        


        


        LAST
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        4
        
        5
        
        6 (current)
        
        7
        
        8
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2015389EN.01002801.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Cerafogli v ECB

(Case T-114/13) (1)

1

((Appeals - ECB Staff - Complaint of discrimination and psychological harassment - Decision of the ECB to close the administrative inquiry initiated following the complaint - Refusal of access to evidence during the administrative procedure - Rejection of a request for an order to produce evidence during the judicial proceedings - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of law))

(2015/C 389/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Maria Concetta Cerafogli (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Feyerbacher, B. Ehlers, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Cerafogli v ECB (F-43/10, ECR, EU:F:2012:184), seeking the annulment of that judgment.

Cerafogli

ECB

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Cerafogli v ECB (F-43/10); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Cerafogli v ECB (F-43/10);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
1

Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:27 PM

To: Woolums, Jane

Cc: Ogulei, David

Subject: RE: Phone Call Record 3/26/14 - Date corrected

Call Record 

Caller: David Ogulei 

Date of call: 3/26/14 

Time of call: 1:49 pm 

Purpose of Call: To obtain updated information on the commercial availability of the multi-metals CEMS.

Call with: Krag Petterson 

Phone no. (503) 670-8335 

Company: Cooper Environmental Services, Portland, Oregon 

1) Any additional updates on the commercial availability of the multi-metals CEMS that you would like to add 

to Mr. Cooper’s?

• A Chinese company (Sale Hero) has purchased a majority stake of Cooper Environmental Services 

• Cooper Environmental will be shipping one stack unit in April/early May to be installed at a Chevron facility in 

Nigeria. Expect the unit to begin operating in mid-summer. 

• Currently working on a special project for SCAQMD (2 secondary lead smelters). SCAQMD will be renting the 

units for a period of 10 months starting around December 2014. Plan to do side by side method 29 testing. Also 

hope to deploy the Quantitative Aerosol Generator (QAG) at this location at some point while the unit is 

deployed there. SCAQMD contact is: phillip fine 310-486-4295. Email: pfine@aqmd.gov.

• No stack unit is currently running at a facility. 

• Currently have a number of ambient units in China, Australia and other countries. 

2) What would be the approximate cost of installing and testing the three units? How much would it be for

one unit? Do you have a sample invoice you can share with us?

• Each unit’s purchase cost is about $250k. Approx. $900k ballpark total for 3 units including installation and 

testing. Would need to visit the facility and do an appraisal of what is needed. 

• Operating costs primarily come from filter tape. For continuous operation (15 min samples), filter tape would 

cost $780 per roll per week ($41k per year) per unit. Total operating cost is approximately $50k per year per 

unit. 

• Krag will look into possibly sharing a copy of the quote they recently did for Chevron ($350k project) but that 

project included a number of spare parts that might not be needed for the average project. 

• Krag will share the rental quote estimate for the SCAQMD. That quote is public information. 

###
EXHIBIT (23)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-64667,
33-64639, 33-34807, 333-130075 and 333-130076) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-61342 and
333-129069) of The Empire District Electric Company of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis,
Missouri
March 3, 2008

---



QuickLinks
**DAAN-13-03**

**Master Solicitation without Additional Clauses**

(January 2017)

The Purchase Order clauses/notes are applicable as indicated in the DLA Master Solicitation for EProcurement Automated Simplified Acquisitions (Part 13), per the Revision and Date stated within the corresponding solicitation.  The DLA Master Solicitation may be found on the Web at http://www.dla.mil/HQ/Acquisition/Offers/eProcurement.aspx.  

(End of Notice)
# Baseline

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
# C_2016211EN.01001101.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 April 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 9 de Barcelona — Spain) — Jorge Sales Sinués v Caixabank SA (C-381/14), and Youssouf Drame Ba v Catalunya Caixa SA (Catalunya Banc SA) (C-385/14)

(Joined Cases C-381/14 and C-385/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Contracts concluded between sellers or suppliers and consumers - Mortgage contracts - ‘Floor’ clause - Examination of the clause with a view to its invalidation - Collective proceedings - Action for an injunction - Stay of an individual action with the same subject matter))

(2016/C 211/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 9 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jorge Sales Sinués (C-381/14), Youssouf Drame Ba (C-385/14)

Defendants: Caixabank SA (C-381/14), Catalunya Caixa SA (Catalunya Banc SA) (C-385/14)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a court, before which an individual action has been brought by a consumer seeking a declaration that a contractual term binding him to a seller or supplier is unfair, automatically to suspend such an action pending a final judgment concerning an ongoing collective action brought by a consumer association on the basis of Article 7(2) of Directive 93/13 seeking to prevent the continued use, in contracts of the same type, of terms similar to those at issue in that individual action, without the relevance of such a suspension from the point of view of the protection of the consumer who brought the individual action before the court being able to be taken into consideration and without that consumer being able to decide to dissociate himself from the collective action.

---

(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.

---
No. 10-6753.

#### Alfred Evans, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1202, 131 S. Ct. 1043,

178 L. Ed. 2d 867,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 932.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 987 A.2d 1138.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 19

- 00751

- CV

IN RE K.J.C., JR. and J.S.M., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 02668

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed.

SIGNED April 8, 2020.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                              THE BANC CORPORATION
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 9, 2004                           /s/ David R. Carter
                                                ---------------------------
                                                    David R. Carter
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### *In re Mettle Tr.,*

No. 91074-0.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44244-2-II, June 24, 2014, 182 Wn. App. 1002. *Denied*September 30, 2015.