alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17823]



[[Page 36469]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 02/03-0185]


J.P. Morgan Investment Corporation; Notice of Request for 
Exemption

    On April 30, 1998, J.P. Morgan Investment Corporation (the 
``Licensee''), a Delaware corporation and SBIC Licensee number 02/03-
0185, filed a request to the SBA pursuant to Section 107.730(a)(1) of 
the Regulations governing small business investment companies (13 CFR 
107.730(a)(1)(1998)) for an exemption allowing the Licensee to invest 
in a newly formed business, The RiskMetrics Group, LLC. Sixty Wall 
Street SBIC Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and SBIC License 
No. 02/02-0563 may also request permission to invest in RiskMetrics 
Group, LLC.
    The RiskMetrics Group, LLC is currently in need of additional 
capital, however, the Licensee can only offer this assistance to The 
RiskMetrics Group, LLC upon receipt of a prior written exemption from 
SBA. The exemption requested is the basis for this notice, and this 
notice is required pursuant to Section 107.730(g) of the Regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any person may, not later than 15 days 
from the date of publication of this Notice, submit written comments on 
this exemption request to the Associate Administrator for Investment, 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20416. A copy of this Notice will be published in a newspaper of 
general circulation in New York, New York.

    Dated: June 24, 1998.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 98-17823 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 1, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51107

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY WAYNE WETLESEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-110-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Timothy Wayne Wetlesen appeals his sentence imposed pursuant

to a plea of guilty to attempt to manufacture methamphetamine. 

See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that pursuant to United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), his case should be

remanded for resentencing because the district court erred in

sentencing him pursuant to the then-mandatory Sentencing

Guidelines. 
No. 04-51107

-2-

By sentencing Wetlesen under a mandatory guidelines regime,

the district court committed what this court refers to as Fanfan

error. See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th

Cir. 2005). The Government concedes that Wetlesen preserved his

Fanfan argument by raising an objection in the district court

pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). Given

the district court’s statement that it would impose the same

sentence in the event the Guidelines were declared

unconstitutional, the Government has carried its burden of

demonstrating harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt. See

e.g., United States v. Saldana, 427 F.3d 298, 314 (5th Cir.

2005), cert. denied, 2006 WL 37834 (Jan. 9, 2006). 

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATE OF VOTE OF DIRECTORS
                    ESTABLISHING A CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK
                    (General Laws, Chapter 156B, Section 26)

     We, Albert Rand, President, and John Wilkinson,
Clerk, of Dynamics Research Corporation located at 60
Frontage Road, Andover, MA 01810-5498 do hereby certify that at a 
meeting of the directors of the corporation held on September 10, 
1998, the following vote establishing and designating a class or 
series of stock and determining the relative rights and preferences 
thereof was duly adopted.  The directors wish to amend the Series B 
Preferred Stock pursuant to Section 26, as no shares of the Series B 
Preferred Stock have been issued at this time.

     VOTED:  That pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of
Directors of this Corporation in accordance with the provisions
of its Restated Articles of Organization, as amended, the voting
powers of the Series B Preferred Stock of the Corporation be and
they hereby are amended as follows:

     Section 3(a) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     "Each share of Series B Stock shall entitle the holder thereof
     to ten votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders
     of the Corporation."

     Section 8 shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     "Certain Adjustments.  In the event the Corporation shall
     at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Stock
     payable in shares of Common Stock, or effect a subdivision
     or combination or consolidation of the outstanding 
     shares of Common Stock (by reclassification or 
     otherwise than by payment of a dividend in shares 
     of Common Stock) into a greater or lesser number 
     of shares of Common Stock, then, in each such 
     case, the amounts set forth in Sections 2(a) and 
     (b), 6(a) and 7 hereof with respect to the 
     multiple of cash and non-cash dividends, the 
     Series B Liquidation Preference and an aggregate 
     amount of stock, securities, cash and/or other 
     property referred to in Section 7 hereof, shall be 
     adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction 
     the numerator of which is the number of shares of 
     Common Stock outstanding immediately after such 
     event and the denominator of which is the number 
     of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding 
     immediately prior to such event."

     Signed under the penalties of perjury, this 10th day of
     September, 1998.

                                                                             
                                         /s/ Albert Rand                   
                                                                              
                                         Albert Rand, President

                                                                              
                                         /s/ John Wilkinson              
                                                                             
                                         John Wilkinson, Clerk
# Employee Reflection: Alicia Robinson

/ Published Feb. 26, 2022

                DLA Disposition Services Lewis Property Disposal Specialist Alicia Robinson.                            220115-D-D0441-6546                            DLA Disposition Services Lewis Property Disposal Specialist Alicia Robinson.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA photoVIRIN: 220115-D-D0441-6546**Describe your job.**

I am a Disposal Service Representative.  I provide customer services to various geographic areas within the states of Washington and Idaho, [addressing] on-site and off-site property disposal questions/concerns.

**How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?**

23 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

12 years.

**What is your favorite memory with DLA Disposition Services?**

My deployment to Iraq working with counterparts in DLA and traveling to various bases to assist with scrap yards and scrap removals. I was very new to DLA at the time and a lot of knowledge was gained by seeing the hands-on processes of scrap removals.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?******

I enjoy working with customers and building a working relationship between the services and DLA Disposition Services Lewis. I receive satisfaction when I have given the customers the training and correct guidance about any type of disposal and then the customers successfully complete their disposition of excess property.

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**

Not really advice given to me, but I continue to follow and help my friends, family, and coworkers understand about “The Mamba Mentality,” a mindset for constant self-improvement in the pursuit of your highest potential in life through Honesty, Detachment, Optimism, Passion, and Fearlessness.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**

Currently, I am acquiring hands-on knowledge from my senior DSR who will be retiring soon. I feel that this is one of the best types of training to help me be the best DSR I can be. Hands-on training from an experienced coworker who shares his knowledge about specific topics and scenarios that don’t happen often helps me deliver the best customer service to the generators by being ahead of any specific situations.

**What was your first job?**

Drive-thru at Arby’s (They have the meats!).

**Any recent reads?**

Most recent book read: *The Mamba Mentality: How I Play*.

**Any shareable quotes?**

“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.” - Michael Jordan

_______________________________________________________________

DLA Disposition Services is celebrating its 50th Anniversary by reflecting on its mission, culture, and workforce. This series is highlighting leadership and employees throughout the agency, across the globe. Visit the historical page to learn more about the MSC and its history.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D C. 20460 

The Honorable John Barrasso 

United States Senate 

Washington. D.C. 20510 

Dear Senator Barrasso: 

OI'I'ICE 01' 

AI~· ,VII(" <AL)IA 1 O•J 

Environmental 

Thank you for your lt:ttcr of March 2, 2015, regarding the proposed rule, .. Revisions to the Health and 

Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings,'' 40 CFR 192. which was 

January 

signed by Administrator Gina :vlcCarthy December 31, 20 I 4, and published in the Federal ReKister on 

26. 2015 (80 FR 4156). I appreciate your interest in the proposal. 

Before issuing this proposal, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency held several meetings with 

stakeholder groups from around the country, including Wyoming. to learn more about what programs 

arc already working to address groundwater protection for in-situ uranium recovery. In your letter. you 

requested that the EPA hold an additional public hearing on this rule in Wyoming. We want to give 

stakeholders in active uranium production regions the opportunity to voice their thoughts ahout this 

proposed nllemaking. so in addition to the public hearing held in Washington. O.C., we are planning 

two puhhc hearings, one in Casper, Wyoming and one in Corpus Christi. Texas. We are in the process of 

tinalizing the dates and locations for these hcanngs, which will be announced on our website. 

EPA 

Recognizing that the proposal asks for comment on a range of issues, some of which arc complex, the 

initially proposed this rule with a 90-day comment period ending April27, 2015. After considering 

extension requests from you and a number of parties, the EPA has decided to extend the comment period 

he 

in order to get the best possible advice and data to inform the final rule. The length of the extension will 

dctcnnincd shortly. 

A formal announcement of the extension will he published in the Federal R~xi.~ . lnfom1ation related 

to the comment period and hearings also will be posted on the EPA· s website at: 

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/tenorm/40CFR 192. 

prop

We encourage you and all interested parties to provide us with detailed comments on all aspects of the 

osed rule. All comments submitted. regardless of method of submittal. will r~ceive the same 

submitted 

consideration. We have submitted your letter to the rulemaking docket. but additional comments can be 

via any of the methods specified in the January 26. Federal Register. Notice of Proposed 

Rulcmaking. 

Rc>cyc

lntt'"'P.I A:ld'""' (UHL • e nnp ..... ww.ei-'~·JO' 

led/Recvclable • P•oniM will> VI!QC•at·'e 0·1 B.o~ed I~,, on t 00" • Po~lconsunw•, P·ocp~~ Ch,or r eF ·q H"'"V' '"'1 P~per 
Again, thank you for your letter. If you have further questions, please contact me or your staff may 

contact Josh Lewis in the EPA's Office ofCongrcssional and Intergovernmental Relations at 

lcwis.josh@cpa.gov or (202) 564<~095. 

Sincerely. 

· Janet G. McCabe 

Acting Assistant Administrator
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Dr.
      John J. McGrath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(i)  the
      Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(ii)  information
      contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding
      Corp.





Dated:
                November 19, 2007
            
            /s/Dr.
                John J. McGrathDr.
                John J. McGrath
              Chief
                Executive Officer and President
No. 10-6233.

#### Malcolm T. Riley, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1063,

178 L. Ed. 2d 878,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1041.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 527, 178 L. Ed. 2d 388, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8592.
No. 10-7913.

#### Tracey Lea, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1195, 131 S. Ct. 1025,

178 L. Ed. 2d 856,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 688.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 166.
# C_2016305EN.01000601.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bologna (District Court, Bologna — Italy) — Pebros Servizi Srl v Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd

(Case C-511/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 - European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims - Article 3(1)(b) - Conditions for certification - Judgment in default - Concept of ‘uncontested claim - Procedural conduct of a party capable of constituting an ‘absence of contestation of the claim’))

(2016/C 305/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pebros Servizi Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The conditions according to which, in the case of a judgment by default, a claim is to be regarded as ‘uncontested’, within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims, must be assessed autonomously, solely in accordance with that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

1

---
No. 10-434.

#### City of Santa Rosa, California, et al., Petitioners v. Patricia DeSantis, Guardian ad Litem, et al.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1043,

178 L. Ed. 2d 863,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1028.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 690.
Exhibit 21.1 — Subsidiaries of the Company as of February 15, 2007Parent Level: R.H. Donnelley Corporation (formerly known as The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation), aDelaware corporation; publicly traded on NYSE as “RHD”       Tier 1 Subsidiaries: R.H. Donnelley Inc. (formerly known as The Reuben H. DonnelleyCorporation), a Delaware corporation wholly owned by R.H. Donnelley Corporation         Dex Media, Inc. (formerly known as Forward Acquisition Corp, a newlyformed entity established to merge with and survive Dex Media, Inc.,the public holding company formerly traded on NYSE as “Dex”), aDelaware corporation wholly owned by R.H. Donnelley Corporation         LocalLaunch, Inc., an Illinois corporation wholly owned by R. H.Donnelley Corporation         Tier 2 Subsidiaries (all 100% owned by R.H. Donnelley Inc.):    DonTech Holdings, LLC*    Get Digital Smart.com Inc.**    R.H. Donnelley APIL, Inc**    R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising, Inc.***    R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising of Illinois Holdings, LLC*           Tier 3 Subsidiaries (both 100% owned by R.H. Donnelley Inc. and another Tier 2 subsidiary):      The DonTech II Partnership****      R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising of Illinois Partnership****           Tier 2 Subsidiaries (all 100% owned by Dex Media, Inc.):             Dex Media East, Inc.**    Dex Media West, Inc.**     Tier 3 Subsidiaries (wholly owned by the relevant Tier 2 subsidiary, unless otherwise indciated)      Dex Media East LLC*      Dex Media West LLC*      Dex Media Service LLC* (owned 49% by each of Dex Media East, Inc. and Dex media West, Inc. and 2% by Dex Media. Inc.               Tier 4 Subsidiaries (wholly owned by the relevant Tier 3 subsidiary)        Dex Media East Finance Co.**        Dex Media West Finance Co.** * Delaware limited liability companies ** Delaware corporations. Get Digital Smart is presently inactive. *** Kansas corporation formerly known as Sprint Publishing & Advertising, Inc., which now does business as R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising and Sprint Yellow Pages®. **** Illinois general partnerships doing business as DonTech and R.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising, respectively
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-106703, 333-106704,333-59234, 333-49274, 333-87875, 333-57933, 333-50689, 333-32795, 333-88706, 33-77600, 33-76090,and 33-36968 on Form S-8 of our report on the financial statements and the financial statementschedule dated March 30, 2005 (April 19, 2005 as to the effect of vacating Building 3 in Redmond,Washington described in Note 12) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern at December31, 2004) of Three-Five Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated March 30, 2005 onmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Three-Five Systems, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
SI TIENES 

DIABETES Y FUMAS, 

PREPÁRATE PARA 

UNA AMPUTACIÓN, 

UNA INSUFICIENCIA 

RENAL, UNA 

OPERACIÓN DEL 

CORAZÓN... O PARA 

LAS TRES. Bill, 40 años

Michigan 

Fumar empeora mucho la diabetes. Usted puede dejar de fumar. 

Para recibir ayuda gratuita, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA. 

#CDCConsejos
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-272-000]


Nora Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 29, 1998, Nora Transmission Company (Nora) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to become effective 
August 1, 1998:

Second Revised Sheets No. 172
Second Revised Sheets No. 173

    Nora states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 587-G issued on April 16, 1998 in Docket No. 
RM96-1-007 adopting new, revised and interpretation of the standards 
promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB). These standards 
require interstate natural gas pipelines to follow certain new and 
revised business practice procedures. The Commission directed pipelines 
to make a filing to change all references to GISB standards in their 
tariffs to Version 1.2 by August 1, 1998. This version number applies 
to all standards contained in GISB's Version 1.2 Standards Manuals, 
including standards that have not changed from the previous versions. 
In compliance, Nora filed to adopt Version 1.2 in Section 38 of its 
General Terms and Conditions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18167 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-233.

#### William Porch, Police Officer, Petitioner v. Michael Garrison.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 820,

178 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9720.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*556Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 274.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Corey M. Horowitz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                                            May 17, 2004
No. 10-7562.

#### Jack Tillman, Jr., Petitioner v. Thomas Birkett, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1014,

178 L. Ed. 2d 841,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 781.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.