alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.33

[Company
Letterhead]

March 11,
2005

Nicholas
J. Costanza
Sr. Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary
The Titan Corporation



Dear
Nick,

This
will confirm that the Board of Directors has approved an extension of the term of that certain Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated April 2, 2003 (the
"Employment Agreement").

Accordingly,
the Term of the Employment Agreement, as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement, is hereby extended for an additional two year period, until April 2, 2007,
unless terminated earlier in accordance with the Employment Agreement.

All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected by this extension and shall remain in full force and effect.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
Gene W. Ray

Gene
W. Ray
Chairman, CEO and President
The Titan Corporation

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 21



                 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                 ------------------------------


     The registrant directly or indirectly owns 100 percent of
the outstanding voting securities of the following subsidiary
companies.

           Name of Company                 Jurisdiction
           ---------------                 ------------
Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc.   Kansas
Calibrated Forms Co., Inc              Kansas
Connolly Tool and Machine Company      Delaware
Admore, Inc                            Texas
PFC Products, Inc.(1)                  Delaware
Ennis Acquisitions, Inc.               Nevada
Texas EBF, LP                          Texas
Ennis Sales, LP                        Texas
Ennis Management, LP                   Texas
Adams McClure, LP                      Texas
American Forms I, LP                   Texas
Northstar Computer Forms, Inc.         Minnesota
General Financial Supply, Inc. (2)     Iowa
Crabar/GBF, Inc.                       Delaware
Royal Business Forms, Inc.             Texas
Alstyle Apparel, LLC                   Texas
A&G, Inc. (3)                          Illinois
Alstyle Ensenada LLC (3)               Illinois
Alstyle Hermosilla LLC (3)             Illinois
Diaco USA LLC (3)                      Illinois
The Great Pumpkin (3)                  Delaware
Cactex S.A. de C.V. (3)                Mexico
Alvest, S.A. de C.V. (3)               Mexico
Diaco, International S.A. de C.V. (3)  Mexico


(1)  A wholly-owned subsidiary of Admore, Inc.
(2)  A wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Computer Forms, Inc.
(3)  A wholly-owned subsidiary of Alstyle Apparel, LLC

<PAGE>
No. 10-6483.

#### Anthony Garvins, Petitioner v. Dave Burnett, et al.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 989,

178 L. Ed. 2d 818,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 123.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 607, 178 L. Ed. 2d 443, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8812.
Exhibit
      32.2


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Warrino,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2005











/s/
      Joseph Warrino


Chief
      Financial Officer
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        6
        
        7
        
        8
        
        9
        
        10 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### E-Unit, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, et al., Respondents, v Lewis Saul et al., Appellants.

[58 NYS3d 863]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carolyn E. Demarest, J.), dated June 17, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to impose sanctions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendants’ contentions, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of their cross motion which was to impose a monetary sanction upon the plaintiffs and their attorney, as the defendants failed to demonstrate that either engaged in frivolous conduct within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) *(see Finkelman v SBRE, LLC,*71 AD3d 1081, 1082 [2010]; *Glenn v Annunziata,*53 AD3d *902565, 566 [2008]).

Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.
T o w

ho i t ma y c on c

e r n :

As a c on c e r n e d c i t i z e n o f t h e S an J o a q u i n Va l l e y I am t r ou b l e d b y t h e f

a c t

t h e E P A i s

gr an d f a t h e r i n g i n t h e p o w

e r p l an t i n A v e na l

, C A

. T h e S an J o a q u i n

v a ll e y i s a r

e g i on t ha t a l r

e a d y ha s h i g h c

a s e s o f a s t hma an d ha s mu l t i p l e

ci t i e s i n t h e t o p 1 0 o f b a d a i r q ua li t y i n t h e na t i on. W i t h t h i s b e i n g t h e c

a s e

, t h e h i g h e s

t a n d n e w

e s t s t an d a rd s mu s

t b e a d h e r

e d t o i n o rd e r t o k e e p i t s

ci t i z e n s h e a l t h y

. P l e a s

e r e c o n s i d e r an d D O N O T gr an d f a t h e r i n t h e Av e na l

p o w e r p l an t

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

H e l e n C P a l m e r A v e n a l P o w

e r P l a n t

H e l e n Ch a v a r r i a

to :

R 9 A i r P er m i t s

04 / 1 2 / 20 1 1 1 0 : 4 4 P M

H i d e D e t a il s

F r o m : H e l e n Ch a v a r r i a

To: R 9 A i r P e r m i t s @ E P A

H i s t o r y : T h i s m e s s

a g e h a s b ee n f

o r w a r d e d

. P a g e 1 o f 1

4 / 14 / 2011
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
No. 10-6520.

#### Ernest Brim, aka Bernard Horne, Petitioner v. Aristedes W. Zavares, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1174, 131 S. Ct. 990,

178 L. Ed. 2d 819,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 511.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 533, 178 L. Ed. 2d 392, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8565.
No. 10-5198.

#### Charles Hines, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 909, 131 S. Ct. 257,

178 L. Ed. 2d 170,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6879.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 133.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01
                              THE BANC CORPORATION
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Banc Corporation
(the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 9, 2005                         /s/ C. Stanley Bailey
                                              -----------------------
                                              C. Stanley Bailey
                                              Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Midwestern States Regional Fairness Board; Public Hearing

    The Midwestern States Regional Fairness Board Public Hearing is to 
be held on August 10, 1998, starting at 1:00 p.m. at the KeyCorp 
National Headquarters, 127 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44114, in space 
being donated by the KeyCorp Banking Group, to receive comments from 
small businesses concerning regulatory enforcement or compliance taken 
by Federal agencies. Transcripts of these proceedings will be posted on 
the Internet. These transcripts are subject only to limited review by 
the National Ombudsman.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary P. Peele, telephone (312) 353-
0880.

    Dated: June 15, 1998.
Shirl Thomas,
Director, Office of External Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-16286 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2016027EN.01003401.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO ESTATE)

(Case T-414/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark KENZO ESTATE - Earlier Community word mark KENZO - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 027/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, W. von der Osten-Sacken and M. Ring, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Kenzo (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 May 2013 (Case R 333/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Kenzo and Mr K. Tsujimoto.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward A. Tomechko, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do
hereby certify in accordance with 18. U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
         February 1, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
         requirement of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly present, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.

Dated:  April 18, 2003

                             /s/ Edward A. Tomechko
                             ----------------------------------------------
                             Edward A. Tomechko

                             Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                             Treasurer and Secretary
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT S. SCHWARTZBERG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2860

[July 28, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah Weiss, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502011CF011814AXXXMB.

Andrew B. Greenlee of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 14

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

Earth Sciences, Inc. promotes ethical conduct in the practice of financial
management. Senior financial officers hold an important and elevated role in
corporate governance. They are uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that
shareholders' interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved.

It is the policy of ESI that the principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar function will adhere to the following principles governing
their professional and ethical conduct in fulfillment of their responsibilities:

     1.   Act with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of
          actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
          professional relationships.

     2.   Provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
          reports and documents filed with the SEC as well as other public
          communications.

     3.   Comply with the laws of federal, state, and local governments
          applicable to ESI, and the rules and regulations of regulatory
          agencies.

     4.   Promptly report violations of this code to the ESI Audit Committee, or
          Board of Directors in its absence.

     5.   Be accountable for promoting adherence to this code.
# C_2014061EN.01001702.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/17

---

Action brought on 23 December 2013 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT)

(Case T-714/13)

2014/C 61/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gold Crest LLC (Santa Barbara, United States) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2013 given in Case R 2038/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2013 given in Case R 2038/2012-2;

| — | Declare the Community trade mark applied for eligible for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the Community trade mark applied for eligible for registration;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MIGHTY BRIGHT’ for goods and services in Class 11 — Community trade mark application No 10 853 141

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 65(2) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 09-11051.

#### Henry Lee Peterson, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 456,

178 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7930.

October 12, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 130 S. Ct. 2549, 177 L. Ed. 2d 130 (2010).
No. 10-5770.

#### In re Ronald Perry Baker, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 344,

178 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7752.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# Independent Public Accountant audit kicks off at DLA Distribution 

/ Published April 18, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
DLA Distribution, along with DLA Aviation and DLA Headquarters J3, J6, and J8 personnel, hosted Kearney & Company, the CPA firm that will perform the independent public audit at DLA Distribution.  

The initial entrance conference on April 6 included an overview of DLA Distribution’s plan to stock processes, which include receiving, warehousing, stock readiness, physical inventory, order to cash, transportation shipment control, and driver sign off.  The Distribution team provided flow charts, described activities and the operational/financial and manual/automated process controls in the functional areas.  

The next step is the walk-through on the floor at DLA Distribution Susquehanna.  Kearney is in the planning phase and the initial walk-through will allow the firm to see how DLA Distribution’s work activities and controls are performed in the distribution center environment.  Kearney expects to schedule more interviews and follow-on sessions to have more detailed dialog following the walk-through.  Testing of controls at distribution centers will begin on or around mid-April and initial distribution centers identified for testing include:  DLA Distribution Albany; DLA Distribution Norfolk; DLA Distribution Tobyhanna; DLA Distribution Warner Robins; and DLA Distribution Susquehanna.

During the entrance conference, DLA Distribution described how inventory is received, warehoused, inventoried, and shipped using the same process, that there is no difference whether DLA or military service-owned.  Processes and controls in the process are performed in a standard manner.  

From June through September, Kearney will focus on learning DLA's business.  This means they will be pulling documentation, reading all the PCMs and SOPs.  Then in October, the IPA will begin their audit of DLA, all business cycles, and all controls.  The normal process is for the IPA(s) to audit in line with each fiscal year and to release their final report the November following the audit.  The first audit report is scheduled to be issued in November of 2017.   

According to Edwin Caron with Kearney & Company, “An assessment will be conducted to determine any risks and then recommendations will be made to DLA Distribution to create a plan of action.” 

Scott Rosbaugh, DLA Distribution Future Plans director concluded that “The report will be a catalyst for continued process improvement.”