alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### People v Dingle

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 623 (Bronx)

denied 8/24/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
# Navy birthday: “Tough, Bold and Ready” for 241 years

/ Published Oct. 17, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, To commemorate the Navy’s 241st birthday and celebrate its theme “Tough, Bold and Ready,” DLA Distribution took a look back at the service’s rich history on Oct. 13.
Employees gathered around as deputy commander Twila Gonzales, Senior Executive Service, recounted how the Navy began during the Revolutionary War and was subsequently disbanded, only to be reinstated by the Naval Act of 1794.     

“Since its birth, the American Navy has come to the aid of freedom around the world.  Events such as Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, the bombing of the USS Cole and the terrorist attacks of September 11 evoke memories of tragedies and victories that linger long after the years pass by,” said Gonzales.

“Continuing in its 18th century charter, to protect the seas and the freedoms of the nation, the Navy extends its reach far beyond our shores and to the oceans around the world,” she continued.  “Today, I ask you to remember the sailors who fought more than 200 years ago, and also those who serve now and have given another year of sacrifice, service and time away from family and friends.”

In closing, Gonzales thanked all of the organization’s active, reserve and retired Navy sailors, and invited them forward to help her cut the ceremonial cake.
# C_2016007EN.01002302.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Mustang v OHIM — Dubek (Mustang)

(Case T-606/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Mustang - Earlier national word and figurative marks MUSTANG - No risk of detriment to the reputation of the earlier marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009))

(2016/C 007/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG (Künzelsau, Germany) (represented by: initially S. Völker, then C. Roos and S. Speckmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Dubek Ltd (Petach Tikva, Israel) (represented by: C. Thomas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 September 2013 (Case R 416/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG and Dubek Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,783
<PP&E>                                          56,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           841
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,713
<SALES>                                         48,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,676
<CGS>                                           36,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,071
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2246

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to include organ donation

information with individual income tax refund payments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. DORGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to include organ

donation information with individual income tax refund

payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Organ Donation Insert

5 Card Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ORGAN DONATION INFORMATION INCLUDED WITH

7 INCOME TAX REFUND PAYMENTS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

9 shall include with any payment of a refund of individual

10 income tax made during the period beginning on February
2

•S 2246 IS

1 1st of the first calendar year beginning more than 4

2 months after the date of the enactment of this Act and

3 ending on June 30th of such year a copy of the document

4 described in subsection (b).

5 (b) TEXT OF DOCUMENT.—The Secretary of the

6 Treasury shall, after consultation with the Secretary of

7 Health and Human Services and organizations promoting

8 organ donation, prepare a document suitable for inclusion

9 with individual income tax refund payments which—

10 (1) encourages organ donation;

11 (2) includes a detachable organ donor card; and

12 (3) urges recipients to—

13 (A) sign the organ donor card;

14 (B) discuss organ donation with family

15 members and tell family members about the re16 cipient’s desire to be an organ donor if the oc17 casion arises; and

18 (C) encourage family members to request

19 or authorize organ donation if the occasion

20 arises.

Æ
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2881-000]

Entergy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 19, 1998
    Take notice that on May 1, 1998, Entergy Services, Inc., (Entergy 
Services), as agent for System Energy Resources, Inc. (SERI), tendered 
for filing the annual informational update (Update), containing the 
1998 redetermination of the Monthly Capacity Charges, prepared in 
accordance with the provisions of SERI's Power Charge Formula (PCF) 
Tariff. Entergy Services states that the Update redetermines the 
formula rate in accordance with the annual rate redetermination 
provisions of Section 2(B) of the PFC.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before June 26, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17325 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
# MRKTSHR 9150
The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-2108

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

John Lawrence Drennan, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 4, 1996

 Filed: April 22, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John L. Drennan, Jr., appeals from the district court's order

1

imposing a ten-month term of imprisonment upon revocation of his supervised

release. On appeal, appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising as issues whether the district

court sentenced Drennan within the applicable range and whether the

district court abused its discretion in imposing the ten-month sentence.

We conclude Drennan was sentenced within the proper range, and the

record convinces us that the district court considered and applied the

pertinent statutory and Sentencing Guidelines provisions. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e); U.S.S.G. §§ 7B1.1(a)(3),
-2-

7B1.4(a). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Smeathers, 930

F.2 d 18, 18-19 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam); United States v. Graves, 914

F.2d 159, 161 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam).

In accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have

reviewed the record and have found no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 23, 2015

d1020

Order 

Clerk

October 23, 2015

152178(150)

In re JACO/ROBINSON, Minors SC: 152178

COA: 323922

Wayne CC Family Div:

08-479589-NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

11, 2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
No. 10-7020.

#### Melvin Cornnell Dodson, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 1144, 131 S. Ct. 914,

178 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 291.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 445.
No. 10-6566.

#### Virgil Lane, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 438,

178 L. Ed. 2d 340,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8307.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 440.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30075 29-MAR-2011 08:33 AM
NO. SCWC-30075 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. DEWITT LONG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30075; CR. CASE NO. 1P109-1433) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1 (By: Duffy, J., for the court ) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Dewitt Long’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on February 17, 2011, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, March 29, 2011. FOR THE COURT: /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. Associate Justice Thomas Watersfor petitioner/defendantappellant on the application

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nacino, assigned by reason of vacancy.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36293-36294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17662]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Announcement of the 1998 Unsolicited Fall Grant Program

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency announces its Upcoming Deadline for the 1998 
Unsolicited Grant Fall Competition, which offers support for research, 
education and training, and the dissemination of information on 
international peace and conflict resolution.
    Deadline: October 1, 1998.

DATES: Application Material Available Upon Request, Receipt Date for 
Return of Application: October 1, 1998, Notification of Awards: Late 
January 1999.


[[Page 36294]]


ADDRESSES: For Application Package: United States Institute of Peace, 
Grant Program, 1550 M Street, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20005-
1708, (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 429-6063 (fax), (202) 457-1719 
(TTY), Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6c1d4c7c8d2f9f9d6d4c9c1d4c7cbe6d3d5cfd688c9d4c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a0d180b041e35351a18050d180b072a1f19031a4405180d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Applications also available on-line at our web site: www.usip.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Grant Program, Phone (202) 429-3842.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
Bernice J. Carney,
Director, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-17662 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2645 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mrs. WALORSKI, 

and Ms. HOULAHAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

care provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

newborn children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Newborn Care Im5 provement Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2645 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES PRO2 VIDED TO NEWBORN CHILDREN BY DEPART3 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 Section 1786 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

7 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘seven days’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘14 days’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub10 section: 

11 ‘‘(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 31 days after 

12 the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to 

13 the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the 

14 Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Rep15 resentatives a report on the health care services provided 

16 under subsection (a) during such fiscal year, including the 

17 number of newborn children who received such services 

18 during such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter S. Teshima, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/S/    PETER S. TESHIMAPeter S. TeshimaCorporate Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 11, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-8590 (10A737).

#### Emmanuel Fitzgerald Hammond, Petitioner v. Brian Owens, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1208, 131 S. Ct. 1067,

178 L. Ed. 2d 881,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1073.

January 25, 2011.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Fulton County, denied. The order heretofore entered by Justice Thomas vacated.
No. 10-503.

#### John E. Erickson, et ux., Petitioners v. City of Auburn, Washington.

562 U.S. 1136, 131 S. Ct. 909,

178 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 288.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 750.
##### 



(1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period December 31, 2005
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jeffrey A. LudrofJeffrey A. LudrofPresident & Chief Executive Officer/s/ Philip A. GarciaPhilip A. GarciaExecutive VP & Chief Financial OfficerMarch 8, 2006
          98
##### 



(ECC LETTERHEAD)

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, Robert L. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of ECC
International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 of the Company
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Robert L. Collins  
| |  |                        
| |  | Robert L. Collins      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | September 3, 2003      

Page 55 of 56
# C_2013171EN.01003402.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/34

---

Action brought on 10 April 2013 — 1872 Holdings/OHIM — Havana Club International (THE SPIRIT OF CUBA)

(Case T-207/13)

2013/C 171/64

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 1872 Holdings vof (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Antoine-Lalance, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Havana Club International, SA (Havana, Cuba)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Marked of 31 January 2013 in case R 684/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Marked of 31 January 2013 in case R 684/2012-1;

| — | Order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘THE SPIRIT OF CUBA’ for goods and services of classes 33, 35 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 2 109 106

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The application of invalidity was based on Articles 52(1)(a) and 7 (1)(b), (c) and (g) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-5961.

#### Darrell Jan Bennett, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1128,131 S. Ct. 900,

178 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 506.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carr v. United States, 560 U.S. 438, 130 S. Ct. 2229, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1152 (2010).
No. 10-7519.

#### Stephanie Roberson, Petitioner v. Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Association.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1011,

178 L. Ed. 2d 839,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 715,

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

Date: February 8, 2006

| |  | BY: /s/ William R. Walker
Name:  William R. WalkerTitle:    Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------