alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 28, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. FNB Corporation, Hermitage, Pennsylvania, and Southwest Banks, 
Inc.; to merge with Citizens Holding Corporation, Clearwater, Florida, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens Bank and Trust Company, 
Clearwater, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17741 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17536]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary
[Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 98-6-33), Dockets OST-97-2940 and 
OST-97-2941]


Applications of Planet Airways, Inc. for New Certificate 
Authority

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue orders (1) finding Planet 
Airways, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and (2) awarding it certificates 
of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate and foreign 
charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
July 10, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets OST-97-2940 and OST-97-2941 and addressed to the Department of 
Transportation Dockets (SVC-124.1, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 and 
should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Kathy Lusby Cooperstein, Air 
Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 
366-2337.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-17536 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-U
### GenOn Energy Inc.
Conemaugh Generating Station

Infilco Degremont Inc. iBIO/DOWEX Wastewater Treatment System Provisional Performance Acceptance Test Plan

Master Document - Final April 20, 2012

Page 13 of 23

### GenOn Energy Inc.
Conemaugh Generating Station

Infilco Degremont Inc. iBIO/DOWEX Wastewater Treatment System Provisional Performance Acceptance Test Plan

Master Document - Final April 20, 2012

Page 14 of 23
No. 10-5998.

#### Salvatore Vincent Fazio, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 901,

178 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 86.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 835.
# Employee Spotlight: Joi Downing

/ Published Dec. 28, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Joi Downing

**Organization:** DLA Aviation Richmond

**Years of service:** 2 years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?** As a post award contract specialist, I’m responsible for resolving contract issues after a contract is awarded. That entails but not limited to - payment issues, contract errors which result in modifications, communication with all specialists on other teams (resolution, packing, product, etc).

**What do you like most about your job?** I love that I work on something different daily. Every day is not the same “robotic” work assignment. I come in not knowing what my day will consist of and I am always challenged in some way throughout my workday or weekly. I love that I am able to lean on my team for challenges that I face that I do not understand and/or need help with and that does include my branch chief, Konni Small, who is the most helpful person that I have encountered working here.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA?** Our teams Thanksgiving picnic! I met so many people in person who I only had email/phone communication with. It just felt good being able to come together and fellowship while also meeting “new” administrators and learning their backgrounds.

**What aspect of your job gives you the most personal satisfaction?** When I can help and assist someone else and guide them to the correct solution -  it’s a rewarding feeling. One because it shows how far I came from just starting off in this role and not knowing anything to now being able to help others. That also builds my relationships with others for when I need help and I can go to them. This role is a “team effort” role. We all need each other to help support the warfighter and to do our job efficiently and in excellence.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I started a nonprofit called “NO CHILD LEFT ALONE” in memory of my niece and nephew who passed away in 2013 at very young ages. I run it with my mother, who has been with DLA for more than 30 years . I also have a closet organizing and styling business that I am also passionate about.

**What’s the most thrilling/adventurous thing you have ever done?** Went skydiving. Whew! That’s the most exhilarating, craziest, fearless thing I have ever done and probably will ever do, considering I am afraid of heights! Maybe ziplining will be next!

**What is your proudest accomplishment and why?** Moving to Brooklyn, New York on my own. I had never taken a big risk like that in my life and it was the best decision I had ever made. I didn’t have a plan just faith and it all worked out!
# C_2015429EN.01000601.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Benjámin Dávid Nagy v Vas Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság

(Case C-583/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Principle of non-discrimination - Article 18 TFEU - Citizenship of the Union - Article 20 TFEU - Freedom of movement for persons - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Road use - Drivers resident in the Member State concerned - Requirement to provide on the spot proof of lawful use of vehicles registered in another Member State at a police check))

(2015/C 429/07)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Benjámin Dávid Nagy

Applicant:

Defendant: Vas Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63(1) TFUE precludes national legislation under which, as a rule, only vehicles that have administrative authorisation and registration plates issued by the Member State in question may be used on the road network in that Member State and under which, if a resident of that Member State seeks to rely on a derogation from that rule, on the grounds that he uses a vehicle made available to him by the keeper of that vehicle established in another Member State, he must be able to prove on the spot, during a police check, that he fulfils the conditions for such a derogation, as laid down by the national legislation in question, on pain of the immediate imposition of a fine equivalent to that applicable in the event of infringement of the registration requirement, without any possibility of an exemption from that fine.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 23.3.2015.

1

---
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

**Start Date/Time:**

Thursday, August 1, 2024 11:30 AM

**Description:**

During the month of August, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma will transition to the Warehouse Management System. Customers with questions or concerns about their material are encouraged to reach out via the contact informationon the Oklahoma City location page.

Enrolled Users:

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
# C_2016260EN.01000301.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from Klagenævnet for Udbud — Denmark) — MT Højgaard A/S, Züblin A/S v Banedanmark

(Case C-396/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Jurisdiction of the Court - Status of the referring body as a court or tribunal - Procurement procedure in railway infrastructure sector - Negotiated procedure - Directive 2004/17/EC - Article 10 - Article 51(3) - Principle of equal treatment of tenderers - Group composed of two companies and admitted as such as a tenderer - Tender submitted by one of the two companies, in its own name, the other company having been declared insolvent - Company considered to be capable, by itself, of being admitted as a tenderer - Contract awarded to that company))

(2016/C 260/03)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Klagenævnet for Udbud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: MT Højgaard A/S, Züblin A/S

Applicants:

Defendant: Banedanmark

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of equal treatment of economic operators, stated in Article 10 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, read together with Article 51 of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that a contracting entity is not in breach of that principle where it permits one of two economic operators who formed part of a group of undertakings that had, as such, been invited to submit tenders by that contracting entity, to take the place of that group following the group’s dissolution and to take part, in its own name, in a negotiated procedure for the award of a public contract, provided that it is established, first, that that economic operator by itself meets the requirements laid down by the contracting entity and, second, that the continuation of its participation in that procedure does not mean that other tenderers are placed at a competitive disadvantage.

---

(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.

1

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1643

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND Brian E. Frosh; NANCY K. KOPP, Treasurer , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv
- 02830

- GJH )

Submitted : August 23 , 2018 Decided: August 27, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Cox, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opini ons are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reason s stated by the district court. Torkornoo v. Maryland , No. 8:17

-

cv
- 02830

- GJH (D. Md., filed May 1 1 , 2018; entered May 1 4 , 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# MIK E BRYANTO N INGHA M COUNT

Y CLER K MAI N OFFIC E .KSEJOB ^ BRANC H OFFIC E P.O

. Bo x179 /^^^ \ 1^'Floo r Courthous e ^^^'f^'^Ll l 31 3 W

. Kalamazo o Mason , M l 4885 4 W^^ X Lansing , M l 4893 3 Phone:(517)676-720 1 ^SS ^ Phone:(517)483-642 5 Fax : (517)676-725 4 ^^SEE ^ pg^^
. (517)483-642 1 Fin d u s o n th e we b at : www.inahann.ora/cl/clindex.ht m

February24 , 201 2 J l 

### 0

,..,. - .--.^''- i

CD'--<-r ; Unite d State s Departmen t o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t Facilit y Su n CountrySlo t Exemptio n Docke t No

. FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAvenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0
Dea rSecretaryLahood , Pleas e fin d enclose d th e Resolutio n #12-30 , i n support o f Su n CountryAirline s Landin g Right s a t Reaga n Nationa l Airport

. I t was passe d b you rIngha m Count yBoar d o f Commissioner s o n February14 , 2012
. Sincerely ,
Cath yHarskin s Ingha m Count yCler k Clerica l Service s Superviso r

En cADOPTE D - FEBRUAR Y 14,201 2 Agend aIte mNo
. 4 Introduce db y th e Count y Service s Committe e o f the : INGHA M COUNT Y BOAR D O FCOMMISSIONER S RESOLUTIO N I N SUPPOR T O FSU N COUNTR Y AIRLINE S LANDIN G

RIGHT S A T REAGA N NATIONA L AIRPOR T

RESOLUTIO N #12-3 0 WHEREAS , SimCountry Airline s was awarde dtw o insid e perimete r slo t exemption s b y th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n a

t Ronal dReaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airport (DCA) : an d WHEREAS , Su n Country airline s ha s use dth e tw o availabl e slot s for dail y roimdtri p servic e betwee n DC A an d Lansing , Michigan sinc e Apri l o f 2011 ; an d WHEREAS , thi s non-sto p servic e t o Washingto n D C ha s prove n t o b e popula r with th e Su n Country airline s experiencin g a15 6 percen t increas e i n dail y passenger s i n th e thir dquarte r o f 201 1 ove r

th e number s from a year earlier ; an d WHEREAS , Lansin g ha dpreviousl y los t thi s nonsto p servic e i n 200 5 du e t o airlin e bankruptcie s an di f i t lose s thi s servic e agai n woul db e on e o f th e few stat e capital s withou t nonsto p servic e t o Washingto n DC
. THEREFOR E B E I T RESOLVED , that th e Ingha mCount y Boar do f Commissioner s hereb y support s Sun Coimtry Airline s appea l t o retai n landin g right s an dslo t exemption s Docke t

No
. FAA-2012-008 9 a

t Ronal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airport
. B E I T FURTHE RRESOLVED , tha t th e County Clerk

forwardacop y o f

thi s Resolutio n t o th e Unite dState s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

Facility , th e Capita l Regio n Airport Authority , Congressma n Mik e Roger s an dSenato r Debbi e Stabeno w an dSenato r Carl Levin
. COUNT Y SERVICES : Yeas : Holman , Schor , Grebner , Celentino , D e Leon , Vicker s Nays : Non e Absent : Non e Approve d2/7/1 2
#### In the Matter of Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Patchogue-Medford School District et al., Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 401]

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review *849a determination of the respondent Patchogue-Medford School District dated November 15, 2001, which rejected an arbitrator’s advisory opinion and award and an action for a judgment declaring that the respondent Patchogue-Medford School District violated the parties’ collective bargaining agreement by transferring the petitioner Ronald Hughes from his daytime position at the Patchogue-Medford High School to the night shift at the elementary school of the respondent Patchogue-Medford School District, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), entered October 22, 2002, which dismissed the petition and declared that the respondent Patchogue-Medford School District did not violate the parties’ collective bargaining agreement by transferring the petitioner Ronald Hughes from his daytime position at the Patchogue-Medford School District.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, the Supreme Court did not, in the guise of interpreting the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter the agreement), rewrite provisions of the agreement. It is well established that the interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a function for the, court and matters extrinsic to the agreement may not be considered when the intent of the parties can be gleaned from the four corners of the document (see *W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri,*77 NY2d 157 [1990]). In short, the proper aim of the court is to arrive at a construction which will give fair meaning to all of the language employed by the parties, and to reach a “practical interpretation of the expressions of the parties to the end that there be a ‘realization of [their] reasonable expectations’ ” *(Brown Bros. Elec. Contrs. v Beam Constr. Corp.,*41 NY2d 397, 400 [1977], quoting 1 Corbin, Contracts § 1). The Supreme Court properly determined that in reviewing and interpreting the plain language contained within the four corners of the agreement, Article X, section C of the agreement, when read in conjunction with Article II, section G of the agreement, clearly and unambiguously permitted the respondent Patchogue-Medford School District (hereinafter the School District) to involuntarily transfer the petitioner Ronald Hughes from his daytime position as a custodian at the Patchogue-Medford High School to the night shift at the School District’s elementary school due to an altercation with a student at the high school.

Furthermore, the School District’s determination to transfer Hughes was not arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222 [1974]; *Matter of Lyons v Whitehead,*291 AD2d 497 [2002]). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/S/ COREY M. HOROWITZ
------------------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
NOVEMBER 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 23.1

              Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent
              -----------------------------------------------------


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Escalade, Incorporated on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475
and 333-52477) of our reports dated February 18, 2005, except for Note 2 as to
which the date is March 13, 2007 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of the Company as of December 25,
2004 and December 27, 2003, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 25, 2004, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 18, 2005, except as to the 4th paragraph of Management's Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Revised), which is as of March_13,
2007 on our audit of the internal control over financial reporting of the
Company as of December 25, 2004, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A.



/s/ BKD, LLP
----------------------------


BKD, LLP
Evansville, Indiana
March 13, 2007


                                       59
Exhibit
        32
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of BDC Capital, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission (the *“Report”* ),
        I,
        Richard A. Pomije, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18
        U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 Date:
        Ocotber 13, 2006
  /s/
        Richard A.
        Pomije
 Richard
        A. Pomije
 Chief
        Executive Officer and
 Chief
        Financial Officer