alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36156-36157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

7 CFR Part 457


Guaranteed Production Plan of Fresh Market Tomato; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulation 
which was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, May 1, 1997 
(62 FR 23628-23634), and subsequently corrected on June 20, 1997 (62 FR 
33539). The regulation pertains to the Guaranteed Production Plan of 
Fresh Market Tomato Regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 21, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise Narber, Insurance Management 
Specialist, Research and Development, Product Development Division, 
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of 
Agriculture, 9435 Holmes Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, telephone (816) 
926-7730.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulation that is the subject of this correction was 
intended to provide policy changes to better meet the needs of the 
insured and include the current Fresh Market Tomato (Guaranteed 
Production Plan) Crop Insurance Regulations with the Common Crop 
Insurance Policy for ease of use and consistency of terms.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulation and the subsequent final rule 
correction contain errors which may prove to be misleading and need to 
be clarified. The calendar dates for the end of the insurance period 
are being further corrected to designate November 10 instead of 
September 20 as the correct calendar date for the end of the insurance 
period in the states of Florida and Georgia. As currently stated in 
policy, the insurance period is only 31 days. Fall tomatoes require 
approximately 70 days from planting to maturity.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457

    Crop insurance, Fresh market tomato (guaranteed production plan).

    Accordingly, 7 CFR part 457 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

[[Page 36157]]

PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS; REGULATIONS FOR THE 
1998 AND SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT YEARS

    1. The authority citation for part 457 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).


Sec. 457.128  [Corrected]

    2. In Sec. 457.128, paragraph 10(b)(7) is further corrected to read 
as follows: ``October 31 of the crop year in California, November 10 of 
the crop year in Florida and Georgia, and September 20 of the crop year 
in all other states.''

    Signed in Washington D.C., on June 26, 1998.
Joy Harwood,
Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 98-17636 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P
No. 10-6449.

#### Ulysses Thomas Ware, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1174, 131 S. Ct. 990,

178 L. Ed. 2d 819,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 150.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 995, 131 S. Ct. 432, 178 L. Ed. 2d 344, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8241.
No. 10-7671.

#### Cathleen Gary, Petitioner v. DeKalb County, Georgia, et al.

562 U.S. 1204, 131 S. Ct. 1051,

178 L. Ed. 2d 871,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1017.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 360.
No. 10-7801.

#### Michael Antrantrino Lee, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1161, 131 S. Ct. 969,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 139.

178 L. Ed. 2d 797,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 345.
No. 09-958.

No. 09-1158.

#### David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. (two judgments). David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. California Pharmacists Association, et al.; David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. California Hospital Association, et al.; David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.; and David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioners v. Lydia Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Lisa Brown, et al. *825David Maxwell-Jolly, Director, California Department of Health Care Services, Petitioner v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, et al.

No. 10-283.

562 U.S. 1177, 131 S. Ct. 992,

178 L. Ed. 2d 824,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 835.

January 18, 2011.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petitions. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Same cases below, (No. 09-958) 572 F.3d 644 (first judgment) and 342 Fed. Appx. 306 (second judgment); (No. 09-1158) 596 F.3d 1098 (first judgment), 563 F.3d 847 (second judgment), 374 Fed. Appx. 690 (third judgment), 596 F.3d 1087 (fourth judgment); and (No. 10-283) 380 Fed. Appx. 656.
SITE MAPS

Hill AFB

https://afmcgeobase.wpafb.af.mil/secureflex/default.aspx?extent=-12477691,5024276,-12455360,5039262

ROBINS AFB

https://afmcgeobase.wpafb.af.mil/secureflex/default.aspx?extent=-9313722,3838692,-9295475,3850937

TINKER AFB

https://afmcgeobase.wpafb.af.mil/secureflex/default.aspx?extent=-10852651,4213655,-10830320,4228641
Order entered October 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00530-CR

No. 05-19-00531-CR

No. 05-19-00532-CR

DAVID EARL SPILLMAN, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 31765, 31766, 31767

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s September 30, 2019 second motions to extend the time 

to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motions and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or 

before October 21, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by October 21, 2019, these appeals may 

be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
Pregnant Women and Their Infants 

Needed for Research Study

What

This study seeks to understand how the natural immune factors of mothers and babies protect against 

vaccines to prevent these infections in the future. 

Who

You may be able to take part in this study if you are:

•

•

• 

• 

18 to 45 years old; 

 34 or more weeks pregnant; 

Plan to deliver at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC) 

Agree for your infant to have study follow up until 2 years of age

Pay

Participants will receive over $1500 if all study procedures are completed over the two years of this study.

Details

513-584-4019 

or or james2ja@ucmail.uc.edu

CCHMC IRB #2016-9093 | UC 62-16
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37371-37372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-289-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Tariff 
Sheets

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 30, 1998, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective August 1, 1998:

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 207
Second Revised Sheet No. 207A

    Texas Gas states that the instant filing is being made to comply 
with the Commission's Order No. 587-G dated April 16, 1998 by 
incorporating by reference the Gas Industry Standards Board's most 
recent version standards (Version 1.2).
    Texas Gas states that copies of this filing are being served upon 
Texas Gas' jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions 
and upon all parties on the official service list in Docket No. RP97-
183.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public

[[Page 37372]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18378 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-11421.

#### Jose Cibrian, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 195,

178 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6795.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 524.
EXHIBIT 32.2












CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    /s/ David C. Kahn
 ------------------------------
 Chief Financial Officer
 August 14, 2012
Regulations.gov will undergo infrastructure maintenance and be unavailable from 6am (ET) through 12pm (ET), Saturday, October 3.

Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Related RINs: None

Related Dockets: None

Short Title: Exceptional Events Guidance

Keyword(s): exceptional events

Type: Nonrulemaking

Location: HQ-OAR

Subtype: Guidance, Policy, Procedure

Proposed Rule Posted: 07/06/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0001

Supporting & Related Material Posted: 07/06/2012

ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0003

Supporting & Related Material Posted: 07/06/2012

ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0002

View Comment Posted: 11/30/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0053

View Comment Posted: 09/26/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0052

View Comment Posted: 09/11/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0051

View Comment Posted: 09/11/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0050

Summary:

View All (1)

Draft Guidance To Implement Requirements for the Treatment of Air Quality

Monitoring Data Influenced... Comment Period Closed

Sep 04, 2012 11:59 PM ET

View All (2)

Responses to Significant First-Round Comments on the Draft Guidance Documents

on the Implementation... Comments Not Accepted

Draft Guidance to Implement Requirements for the Treatment of Air Quality

Monitoring Data Influenced... Comments Not Accepted

View All (50)

See attached file”

See attached file(s)”

See attached file(s)”

See attached file(s)”

see attachment”

Take a Tour!

Docket Folder Summary View all documents and comments in this Docket

Draft exceptional events guidance documents and associated comments received during comment period.

+ View More Docket Details

Site Data

Regulatory

Agenda

Agency

Report

Required by

Statute

Regulations.gov - Docket Folder Summary http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;rpp=100;so=DESC;sb=docId...

1 of 2 10/1/2015 3:25 PM
View Comment Posted: 09/07/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0887-0046

Regulations.gov - Docket Folder Summary http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;rpp=100;so=DESC;sb=docId...

2 of 2 10/1/2015 3:25 PM
No. 10-5030.

#### In re Caesar White, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 230,

178 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7811.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 10-6774.

#### Jose Alberto Villasenor, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 547,

178 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8403.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 467.
AFS-12-282-E April 4, 2012

Exemption No. 10498 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0320

Ms. Michelle Douglas Parent of Amaya Douglas

69 North Avenue Rockland, MA 02370

Dear Ms. Douglas:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Amaya Douglas for an exempti on from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Amaya to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Amaya.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security2

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Amaya Douglas an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Amaya is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Amaya to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Amaya’s parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Amaya Douglas may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her . In addition, Amaya’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosures
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36246-36247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98F-0484]


Eastman Chemical Co.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
Eastman Chemical Co. has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of di-2-
ethylhexylterephthalate as a component of closure- sealing gaskets for 
food containers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Hortense S. Macon, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-205), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3086.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4593) has been filed by Eastman Chemical Co., 
P.O. Box 431, Kingsport, TN 37662. The petition proposes to amend the 
food additive regulations in Sec. 177.1210 Closures with sealing 
gaskets for food containers (21 CFR 177.1210) to provide for the safe 
use of di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate as a component of closure-sealing 
gaskets for food containers.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment

[[Page 36247]]

nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: June 17, 1998.
 Laura M. Tarantino,
 Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 98-17547 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the “Report”), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required bySection 906, has been provided to SunCom Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by SunCom Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification “accompanies” the quarterly report on Form 10-Qto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of SunCom Wireless, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9055]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Drawing in Silver and Gold: Leonardo to Jasper 
Johns'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Drawing in Silver and Gold: Leonardo to 
Jasper Johns,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on 
or about May 5, 2015, until on or about July 26, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy 
and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department 
of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 27, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05274 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# Schedule B4
No. 10-5130.

#### Joseph Mann Propst, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1065, 131 S. Ct. 640,

178 L. Ed. 2d 485,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9085.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 42.