alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AND

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 169

Disposition Services Network Optimization (NetOps) Field Office Realignment

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and the American Federation of Government 

Employees Council 169 (AFGE) (collectively, the Parties) enter into this Memorandum 

of Agreement (Agreement) for the completion of the Disposition Services Network 

Optimization (NetOps) Field Office Realignment plan. 

The Parties agree:

1. The agency will affect Hiring Freeze of Disposition Services CONUS bargaining 

unit employee (BUE) vacancies to include the new Equipment Specialist positions 

to allow placement of impacted employees. Only those vacancies for which a 

selection has not already been made will be included in the Hiring Freeze. The 

agency will provide AFGE Council 169 a list of Disposition Services CONUS 

vacancies included in the Hiring Freeze.

2. Employees will be enrolled in the Priority Placement Program (PPP) as 

appropriate. Which encompasses all DoD agencies in the commuting area.

3. Impacted employees may be allowed to remain at the closing site up to 30 days 

beyond the site closure date for purposes of meeting initial eligibility for 

retirement not to exceed 30 September 2022.

4. The agency will provide AFGE Council 169 with general information regarding 

the reorganization process, which will be released to the impacted workforce. 

5. The agency will provide AFGE Council 169 a listing of employees requiring a 

higher security clearance and will provide monthly updates until the process is no 

longer in DLA control. 

6. The agency will consider all possible personnel actions prior to downgrading an 

employee. Disposition Services will provide Grade and Pay retention to 

employees downgraded as a result of Disposition Services Field Re-alignment 

(NetOps).

7. The agency will monitor the workload at the losing sites and as determined by 

management, will adjust workload, as needed.
For the Union: For the Agency:

 //S// 03/31/2021 //S// 04/07/2021

____________________________ _______________________

Frank D. Rienti, Jr. Date Billie W. Keeler Date

President, AFGE Council 169 Acting Director, DLA 

 Human Resources
No. 10-7662.

#### Derek N. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Maryland.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1050,

178 L. Ed. 2d 870,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1030,

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 11.
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In connection with AmendmentNo. 1 to the Annual Report of Educational Development Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Randall W. White, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: March 29, 2004       By  /s/ Randall W. White   Randall W. White   President and Chief Executive Officer   
In connection with AmendmentNo. 1 to the Annual Report of Educational Development Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, W. Curtis Fossett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: March 29, 2004 By /s/ W. Curtis Fossett   W. Curtis Fossett   Chief Financial Officer
First Niles Financial, Inc.Niles, Ohio

We have reviewed, in accordance with
standards established by the AICPA, the unaudited interim financial information of First Niles
Financial, Inc. and subsidiary for the period ended March 31, 2000 as indicated in our report
dated May 1, 2000.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your
quarterly report on Form 10 QSB, is being incorporated by reference in the Registration
Statement (File No. 0-24849) on Form SB-2.

We also are aware that our report
referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared
or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
No. 10-7569.

#### Mark A. Grethen, Petitioner v. Western Regional Director.

562 U.S. 1187, 131 S. Ct. 1014,

178 L. Ed. 2d 842,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 832.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 431.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 286 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 

preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the Outer 

Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida (for herself, Mr. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. CRIST, and 

Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit 

oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities in 

certain areas of the Outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of Florida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Florida Coastal Protec5 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 286 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS 

2 PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED AC3 TIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST 

4 OF FLORIDA. 

5 Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

6 (43 U.S.C. 1344) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(i) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS

9 PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN

10 CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA.— 

11 ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other 

12 provision of this section or any other law, the Sec13 retary may not offer for oil and gas leasing or 

14 preleasing or any related activity, any tract located 

15 in— 

16 ‘‘(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mex17 ico that is referred to in section 104(a) of the 

18 Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006; 

19 ‘‘(B) the portion of the South Atlantic 

20 Planning Area south of 30 degrees 43 minutes 

21 North Latitude; or 

22 ‘‘(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area. 

23 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON EFFECT.—Nothing in this 

24 subsection affects any right under any lease issued 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 286 IH

1 under this Act before the date of enactment of this 

2 subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-6393.

#### Marlin E. Jones, Petitioner v. City of North Platte, Nebraska, et al.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 989,

178 L. Ed. 2d 818,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 530.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 603, 178 L. Ed. 2d 440, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8907.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 31, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00434

- CV

Wichita County, Texas, Appellant

v. Environmental Engineering & Geotechnics, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNT Y BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, TRIANA AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA ; CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPIN ION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on June 21, 2018. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the
court’s order . Therefore, th is Court : affirms the portion of the district court’s order directing
Wichita County to pay E nvironmental Engineering & Geotechnics, Inc. ’s (EEG ’s ) scanning expense totaling $3,711.39; reverses the portion of the district court’s order directing the County to pay EEG $92.50 and render s judgment that EEG take nothing for the block

- billed time spent prior to April 25, 201 8 ; and reverse s the remaining portion of the district court’s order directing the County to pay EEG $7,480.00 for the executives’ block

- billed time . W e remand this causefor fu r ther proceeding s consistent with th is C ourt’s opinion. A ppellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
No. 10-517.

#### Indah Estalita, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1001,

178 L. Ed. 2d 827,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 856.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 711.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 24, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Northern Trust Corporation, Chicago, Illinois; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Northern Trust Bank, Federal Savings Bank, 
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan (in organization), and thereby engage in the 
operation of a savings association, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 6, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18281 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35229-35230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 15, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:

[[Page 35230]]

    1. Henderson Family Limited Partnership, Vienna, Missouri; to 
acquire voting shares of Maries County Bancorp, Inc., Vienna, Missouri 
and Progress Bancshares, Inc., Sullivan, Missouri, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Progress Bank, Sullivan, Missouri; Maries County 
Bank, Vienna, Missouri; and Belle State Bank, Belle, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Donald Ray Clark and Kitty Darline Clark, both of Anadarko, 
Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of First State Bank, Anadarko, 
Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 23, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17205 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00263

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 00263\00263_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00263\00263_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00263\00263_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00263\00263_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00263\00263_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00263\Certification Statement Plant ID 00263.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00263\00263_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00263\00263_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2953 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of a 

military department to pay an officer in a reserve component of a 

uniformed service aviation incentive pay at the same rate as an officer 

in the regular component of that uniformed service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. RYAN (for himself and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of a military department to pay an officer 

in a reserve component of a uniformed service aviation 

incentive pay at the same rate as an officer in the 

regular component of that uniformed service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aviation Incentive Pay 

5 Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2953 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EQUAL AVIATION INCENTIVE 

2 PAY FOR MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COM3 PONENTS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 334(e) of title 37, United 

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘that is proportionate 

6 to the compensation received under section 206 for inac7 tive-duty training’’ and inserting ‘‘equal to the amount of 

8 aviation incentive pay for an officer in the regular compo9 nent of the same uniformed service’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING.—Section 206 of 

12 such title is amended by adding at the end the fol13 lowing new subsection: 

14 ‘‘(g) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary 

15 concerned may pay an officer in a reserve component of 

16 a uniformed service aviation incentive pay under section 

17 334 of this title at the same rate as an officer in the reg18 ular component of that uniformed service.’’. 

19 (2) AVIATION CAREER.—Section 301a(d) of 

20 such title is amended by striking ‘‘1/30 of’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVIA VICTORIA ORTEGA 

BAUTISTA; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

 Respondent.

No. 23-366

Agency Nos.

A215-815-035

A215-815-036

A215-815-037

A215-815-038

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Silvia Victoria Ortega Bautista and her three minor children, natives and 

citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-366

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection 

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. 

Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the 

petition for review.

We do not disturb the agency’s determination that petitioners failed to 

establish they suffered harm that rises to the level of persecution. See

See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-17 (9th Cir. 2003) (discrimination and 

harassment did not rise to the level of persecution); see also Flores Molina v.

Garland, 37 F.4th 626, 633 n.2 (9th Cir. 2022) (court need not resolve whether de 

novo or substantial evidence review applies, where result would be the same under 

either standard). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that 

petitioners failed to establish a reasonable possibility of future persecution. See 

Nagoulko, 333 F.3d at 1018 (possibility of future persecution “too speculative”).

Because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they failed to satisfy 

the standard for withholding of removal. See Villegas Sanchez v. Garland, 990 

F.3d 1173, 1183 (9th Cir. 2021). Thus, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of 

removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection 

because petitioners failed to show it is more likely than not they will be tortured by 
3 23-366

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Taylor, Petitioner,*

No. 91752-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45198-1-II, April 28, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1017. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
0*,f<e0$ me S4t~Ve~y Of T'Crn5D0-J`0f1 

Chief- tiocumentary Services Div. 

Department of Transportation 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECIS(ONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 

Cebu Air, Inc. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines . having its principal 

(Name of Company. pleatc print) 

office at 

Cebu Pacific Building, Domestic Road, Barangay 191 Zone 20, Pasay City 1301 Philippines 

(Address) 

hereby designates. pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (foriiierlv wetion l(XI-iib) of (he Pederiii A%iation Act 

of 19-58. w, aiiietided) the person rianied Motv as its Agent upoii whom service of a}l notices and proces•- ajXJ ull oWers. decisions. 

and requiretticiiis of the Depatinient of Trunspoiiation i -nav he made foi- and on behalf of said caiTier. hereby canceNie all previous 

designations of agents made by it to the DOT. 

Naffw of Agent 

Charles F. Donley 11; charies,donley@squirepb.com ; fax 202-626-6780 

(Please Print) 

Address 1200 19th Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name (Initials) - elq9 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Cebu Air, n(c. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by Lance Y. Gokongwei 

President 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be attested undcr its corporate seal by 

Rosalinda F. Rivera Corporate Secretary 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

on this — 15-- day of February 

1 19 2015 

Cebu Air, Inc. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Airlines 

ATTEST: 

Rosalinda F. Rivera, Corporate Secretary 

(Secretary. or other ofricer) 

me r cor 

"' 

Oany) 

000 

,y: 

Lance., TY/o;;2ngwei 

(President) 

OST F 1010.5 (1-95)
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
No. 10-6889.

#### Lionel Newman, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 826,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9700.

178 L. Ed. 2d 563,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.