##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





---




FORM 10-Q





---




(Mark One)





|x |  | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002





OR





| ̈ |  | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




For the transition period from              to
             .





Commission File No.: 0-33213





MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware

77-0454924(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification Number)





2 Results Way


Cupertino, California 95014


(Address of principal executive offices)





Telephone: (408) 864-2000


(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)





---




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.    Yes x    No  ̈





On
November 12, 2002, 30,668,171 shares of Registrants Common Stock, $.0001 par value were outstanding.


---



---

##### Table of Contents




Explanatory Note





We have amended our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 in order to correct a statement made on page 14 in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations regarding the percentage of fiscal year 2003 revenue from contracts entered into before fiscal year 2003. This amendment to the Form 10-Q does not affect previously reported net income or net
income per share




---

##### Table of Contents




MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.





FORM 10-Q





QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002





INDEX





PagePart I: Financial Information

1Item 1: Financial Statements

1Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002

1Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001

2Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001

3Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

11Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

27Item 4: Controls and Procedures

27Part II: Other Information

28Item 1: Legal Proceedings

28Item 4: Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

28Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

29Signatures

30Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32Exhibit Index

33







i




---

##### Table of Contents




PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.


UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(in thousands, except share data)





September 30, 2002


March 31, 2002(unaudited)ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
91,503


$
78,478Short-term investments






13,468Accounts receivable, net


16,254



17,601Prepaid expenses and other current assets


1,258



1,327Total current assets


109,015



110,874Property and equipment, net


6,826



7,252Other assets


2,055



1,583Total assets

$
117,896


$
119,709LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
2,035


$
1,777Accrued expenses


5,140



9,441Deferred revenue


11,916



15,617Total current liabilities


19,091



26,835Other long-term liabilities


110



130Total liabilities


19,201



26,965Commitments and contingencyStockholders equity:Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding






Common stock, $.0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized and 30,534,034 and 30,239,786 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002, respectively


3



3Additional paid-in capital


224,668



223,450Deferred stock-based compensation


(3,049
)


(7,161
)Notes receivable from stockholders


(1,997
)


(1,936
)Accumulated other comprehensive loss


(75
)


Accumulated deficit


(120,855
)


(121,612
)Total stockholders equity


98,695



92,744Total liabilities and stockholders equity

$
117,896


$
119,709





See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.




1




---

##### Table of Contents




MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.


UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


(in thousands, except per share data)


(unaudited)





For the Three Months Ended September 30,


For the Six Months Ended September 30,2002


2001


2002


2001Revenue:Licenses

$
14,690


$
8,205


$
28,067


$
13,574Services


3,081



1,426



7,827



2,663Total revenue


17,771



9,631



35,894



16,237Cost of revenue


3,379



1,878



6,172



3,657Gross profit


14,392



7,753



29,722



12,580Operating expenses:Research and development


4,441



4,308



9,778



8,937Sales and marketing


6,878



5,574



12,915



10,922General and administrative


2,105



1,178



4,330



2,705Amortization of stock-based compensation*


730



1,206



2,631



2,305Total operating expenses


14,154



12,266



29,654



24,869Operating income (loss)


238



(4,513
)


68



(12,289
)Interest income (expense):Interest income


590



177



1,023



220Interest expense


(1
)


(42
)


(3
)


(86
)Interest expensesubordinated convertible promissory notes






(526
)






(526
)Interest income (expense), net


589



(391
)


1,020



(392
)Net income (loss) before income taxes


827



(4,904
)


1,088



(12,681
)Income taxes


(128
)


(70
)


(331
)


(90
)Net income (loss)


699



(4,974
)


757



(12,771
)Less: preferred stock dividend






(5,814
)






(5,814
)Net income (loss) attributed to common shareholders

$
699


$
(10,788
)

$
757


$
(18,585
)Net income (loss) per common sharebasic

$
0.02


$
(1.03
)

$
0.03


$
(1.79
)Net income (loss) per common sharediluted

$
0.02


$
(1.03
)

$
0.02


$
(1.79
)Pro forma shares outstanding:Basic


30,182



10,507



30,006



10,380Diluted


31,900



10,507



32,434



10,380*    Amortization of stock-based compensation included in expense component:Cost of revenue

$
19


$
5


$
39


$
15Research and development


203



290



602



530Sales and marketing


231



284



989



545General and administrative


277



627



1,001



1,215$
730


$
1,206


$
2,631


$
2,305





See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.




2




---

##### Table of Contents




MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.


UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(in thousands, unaudited)





Six Months Ended September 30,2002


2001Cash flows from operating activities:Net income (loss)

$
757


$
(12,771
)Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


2,419



2,219Provision for doubtful accounts


350



Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs






195Accrued interest on subordinated convertible promissory notes






334Accrued interest on note receivable from stockholders


(137
)


(4
)Amortization of stock-based compensation


2,631



2,305Change in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


997



(4,798
)Prepaid expenses and other current assets


69



(698
)Accounts payable


258



(905
)Accrued expenses


(3,872
)


397Deferred revenue


(3,701
)


3,745Other long-term liabilities


(20
)


11Net cash used in operating activities


(249
)


(9,970
)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of property and equipment


(1,993
)


(1,656
)Proceeds from the sale of short-term investments


13,468



Other assets


(472
)


79Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


11,003



(1,577
)Cash flows from financing activities:Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock and exercise of warrants






5Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes and warrants






24,781Proceeds from issuance of common stock


2,346



88Repurchase of subsidiary stock






(402
)Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable from stockholders






13Repurchase of common stock






(21
)Redemption of preferred stock






(30
)Repayment of notes payable to bank






(676
)Net cash provided by financing activities


2,346



23,758Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents


(75
)


Increase in cash and cash equivalents


13,025



12,211Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


78,478



14,713Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
91,503


$
26,924Supplemental disclosure:Non-cash investing and financing activities:Deferred stock-based compensation

$
(315
)

$
4,093Preferred stock dividend

$



$
5,814Repurchase of common stock by reducing note receivable from shareholder

$
813


$
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders

$
16


$
Cash paid for:Interest

$
3


$
128Taxes

$
331


$
90





See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.




3




---

##### Table of Contents




MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.





NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Note 1.    The Company
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies





Basis of Presentation





The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Magma Design Automation, Inc.
(Magma or the Company) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management,
all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the entire fiscal year ending March 31, 2003. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on June 28, 2002. The accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2002 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date.





Use of estimates





Preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates such estimates and assumptions for continued reasonableness. Appropriate adjustments, if any,
to the estimates used are made prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.





Reclassifications





Certain amounts in the fiscal 2002 condensed consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2003 presentation.





Revenue recognition





The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as modified by SOP 98-9. SOP 97-2, as modified, generally requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software
products, upgrades, enhancements, postcontract customer support (PCS), installation, training, etc. to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of the elements. The fair value of an element must be based on evidence
that is specific to the vendor. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and PCS is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for the license agreement is recognized ratably over the term of the
agreement. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the
undelivered elements is deferred, and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. Revenue from licenses that include a right to specified upgrades is deferred until the upgrades are delivered.




4




---

##### Table of Contents




Through June 30, 2001, the Company licensed its Blast Fusion and Blast Chip
products under time-based licenses. Starting in the quarter ended September 30, 2001, the Company began offering perpetual licenses on these products. The CircuitScope and GateScope products are primarily perpetual licenses. In January 2001, the
Company discontinued the development, marketing and licensing of CircuitScope. The Company has also discontinued the marketing and licensing of GateScope as a separate product.





For Blast Fusion and Blast Chip software products, the Companys standard license agreement includes PCS for a specified period of time. Through June 30, 2001, the
Company bundled PCS into its agreements for the entire license term; therefore, vendor specific objective evidence of fair value did not exist for each element of the arrangement. Accordingly, revenue from all license agreements entered into through
June 30, 2001, has been recognized ratably over the contract term after delivery of the product to the customer, provided that there are no uncertainties surrounding the product acceptance, fees are fixed and determinable, collectibility is
probable, and the Company has no remaining obligations other than the delivery of PCS. If an arrangement involves extended payment terms, revenue is recognized to the extent of the lesser of the portion of the fee presently due and payable or the
ratable portion of the entire fee. The Company considers arrangements where less than 80% of the fee is due within one year of the agreement date to have extended payment terms. Payments received from customers in advance of revenue being recognized
are presented as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.





Also, in addition to
continuing to offer time-based licenses bundled with PCS, beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2001, for Blast Fusion and Blast Chip software products, the Company began offering three-year time-based and perpetual licenses with PCS bundled
for the first year of the license term. Thereafter, PCS can be renewed annually for an additional fee stated in the agreement. The Company uses the respective PCS renewal rate as evidence of fair value of PCS; therefore, where the only undelivered
element is PCS, license revenue from these contracts is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of PCS is recognized over the PCS term and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized after the
execution of a license agreement and the delivery of the product to the customer, provided that there are no uncertainties surrounding the product acceptance, fees are fixed and determinable, collectibility is probable, and the Company has no
remaining obligations other than the delivery of PCS. If an agreement involves extended payment terms, revenue recognized on the residual method is limited to amounts due and payable.





License revenue is comprised of software licenses and PCS where the Company does not have vendor specific evidence of fair value of PCS. Service revenue is comprised of PCS
on licenses where the Company has vendor specific evidence of fair value of PCS, and consulting and training on all products. The Company has vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for consulting and training services. Therefore, revenue
from such services is recognized when delivered.





Unbilled receivables





The Company considers unbilled receivables to be revenue that has been recognized in the financial statements, but has not been invoiced
to the customer. As of September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002, unbilled receivables were approximately $2.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and are included in accounts receivable on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.





Commission Expense





The Company recognizes sales commission expense as it is earned by employees. In fiscal year 2002, a portion of the commission is earned upon the customer signing the license agreement, and the
remaining portion is earned as cash payments are received over the term of the license. Beginning in fiscal year 2003, commissions are earned when revenue is recognized.





Allowance for doubtful accounts





The Company evaluates collectibility of trade receivables based upon the analysis of specific accounts. When management becomes aware of a customers inability to pay, such as in the case of bankruptcy or a decline in the
customers operating results or financial position, the Company records a specific reserve for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to an amount believed to be collectible. The Company also has a general reserve for accounts that are not
specifically identified as uncollectible. As of September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002, allowance for doubtful accounts was $450,000 and $100,000, respectively.




5




---

##### Table of Contents




Cash equivalents and short-term investments





The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with remaining maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002 cash equivalents consisted primarily of commercial paper and money market funds.





Restricted Cash





Included in other non-current assets on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets at September 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002 is restricted cash of $517,000 and $564,000, respectively, to support letters of credit as security deposits on leased facilities. The deposits are required for the three-year and five-year terms of
the leases.





Foreign currency





The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency of the subsidiary as the functional currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of
the subsidiaries are translated at current rates of exchange at the balance sheet date, and all revenue and expense items are translated using weighted-average exchange rates for the period. Prior to fiscal 2003, the resultant gains or losses from
translation were not significant. Beginning in fiscal 2003, resultant gains or losses from translation are classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders equity in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets.





Comprehensive Income (Loss)





Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments as follows (in thousands):





Three Months Ended September 30,


Six Months Ended September 30,2002


2001


2002


2001Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$
699


$
(10,788
)

$
757


$
(18,585
)Foreign currency translation adjustments


(219
)






(75
)


$
480


$
(10,788
)

$
682


$
(18,585
)





Recently issued accounting pronouncements





In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121. SFAS 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30,
Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions (APB 30), for the disposal of a segment of a
business. However, it retains the requirement in APB 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is
classified as held for sale. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Companys adoption of SFAS 144 effective April 1, 2002 did not have a material effect on
its condensed consolidated financial statements.





In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, Rescission of
FASB Statements 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections Business Combinations. The provisions of SFAS 145, related to the rescission of SFAS 4, are effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, and
the provisions related to SFAS 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. SFAS 145 rescinds SFAS 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, SFAS 64, Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy
Sinking-Fund Requirements, and SFAS 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers. SFAS 145 also amends SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for
sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS 145 also amends other existing




6




---

##### Table of Contents




authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their
applicability under changed conditions. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.





In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses costs associated with an exit activity (including restructuring) or
with disposal of long-lived assets. Those activities can include eliminating or reducing product lines, terminating employees and contracts, and relocating plant facilities and personnel. The provisions of SFAS 146 will not supersede the accounting
requirements for costs to restructure operations acquired in a business combination. Under SFAS 146, a company will record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at
fair value. The new requirements are effective prospectively for exit and disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. A company may not restate its previously issued financial statements. SFAS 146 also grandfathers the accounting for
liabilities that a company had previously recorded under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit and Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a
Restructuring). The Company will adopt SFAS 146 effective January 1, 2003 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.





Note 2.    Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share





The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period
including stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method and preferred stock using the if-converted method.





The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average common shares used to calculate basic net income (loss) per share to the weighted average common and potential common shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per
share for the three and six months ended September 30, 2002 (in thousands):





Three Months

Six MonthsWeighted average common shares used to calculate basic net income(loss) per share

30,182

30,006Options outstanding using the treasury method

1,315

1,946Warrants using the treasury method

61

78Options exercised and unvested

342

404Weighted average common and potential common shares used tocalculate diluted net income (loss) per
share

31,900

32,434





For the three and six months ended September 30, 2002, 641,134 and
415,876 shares of common stock issuable under stock options plans, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their option exercise prices were greater than the average market price, which would result
in antidilution under the treasury stock method. The weighted-average exercise price of such shares was $16.14 and $18.34 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.





For the three and six months ended September 30, 2001 the diluted net loss per share is the same as the basic net loss per share because potential common shares, composed
of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and upon conversion of preferred stock and common stock subject to repurchase, are not considered when their effect is antidilutive. The following potential common shares have been
excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended September 30, 2001 because their effect would have been antidilutive:





Shares issuable under stock option plans

4,644,920Shares of common stock issued pursuant to stock option plans and subject to repurchase

325,324Shares of common stock purchased by founders and subject to repurchase

171,607Shares of preferred stock on an as if converted basis

9,769,514Shares issuable pursuant to warrants to purchase preferred stock

257,239





As of September 30, 2001, the weighted-average exercise price of common stock issuable
under stock option plans was $7.587, the weighted average repurchase price of common stock issued pursuant to stock option plans outstanding was $0.513, and the weighted-average repurchase prices of founders common stock outstanding was
$.00117, and the weighted average exercise price of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants outstanding was $13.184.





Note
3.    Contingency





The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County,
California Superior Court, which alleges breach of contract, concealment, undisclosed conflict of interest, promissory fraud and misrepresentation arising out of an OEM




7




---

##### Table of Contents




distribution agreement. The plaintiffs second amended complaint filed in September 2002 seeks
damages of $14.7 million,as well as other damages from any gains, profits and advantages lost and punitive damages.





The plaintiff, Prolific, Inc., filed its initial complaint in August 2001 and its first amended complaint in May 2002. The first amended complaint named both the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Rajeev Madhavan, as
defendants. The Company filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiff in December 2001, alleging breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of express warranty and negligent misrepresentation. The Court
sustained defendants demurrer on seven of the eight causes of action at issue in plaintiffs first amended complaint, including all causes of action against Mr. Madhavan. The plaintiffs second amended complaint does not restate most
of these causes of action, such as certain wrongful interference claims, and does not name Mr. Madhavan as a defendant. Accordingly, on September 18, 2002, the Court dismissed the case against Mr. Madhavan with prejudice.





No trial date has been set. Although the Company cannot predict the eventual outcome of the litigation at this time, it believes the
claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against all plaintiffs allegations. No estimate of a loss or range of loss upon resolution of the lawsuit can be made at this time.





The Company may be subject to various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.





Note 4.    Segment Information





The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which requires the reporting of segment information using the
management approach. Under this approach, operating segments are identified in substantially the same manner as they are reported internally and used by the Companys chief operating decision maker (CODM) for purposes of
evaluating performance and allocating resources. Based on this approach, the Company has one reportable segment as the CODM reviews financial information on a basis consistent with that presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements.





Revenue from the North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific region, which includes Japan, India, South Korea,
Taiwan, Hong Kong and the Peoples Republic of China, was as follows (in thousands):





Three Months Ended September 30,

Six Months Ended September 30,2002

2001

2002

2001North America

$
12,565

$
7,436

$
25,126

$
11,415Europe


2,577


773


5,612


1,788Asia Pacific


2,629


1,422


5,156


3,034$
17,771

$
9,631

$
35,894

$
16,237





Revenue attributable to significant customers, representing 10% or
more of total revenue for at least one of the respective periods, is summarized as follows:





Three Months Ended September 30,


Six Months Ended September 30,2002


2001


2002


2001Customer A

18
%

16
%

15
%

15
%Customer B

10


13


11


10Customer C

7


11


7


13







8




---

##### Table of Contents




The Companys revenues were derived from the following products and services
(in thousands):





Three Months Ended September 30,

Six Months Ended September 30,2002

2001

2002

2001Design and implementation software products

$
14,657

$
8,171

$
27,907

$
13,447Analysis and verification software products


33


34


160


127Software maintenance and consulting


3,081


1,426


7,827


2,663$
17,771

$
9,631

$
35,894

$
16,237





Note 5.    Promissory Note





In November 2001, the Companys Vice PresidentNorth America Sales exercised options to purchase 85,713 shares of common stock
at the exercise price of $10.50 per share by executing a full recourse promissory note of approximately $900,000 bearing interest of 5.5% per annum and due in March 2006. The provisions of the note agreement allowed for forgiveness of $540,000
related to principal due under the note and $72,000 related total interest to maturity over the five-year term of the note. In March 2002, the Company forgave approximately $110,000 in principal and interest. In September 2002, the Vice
President-North America Sales resigned, and at the time of his resignation the outstanding balance in principal and interest of the note was approximately $829,000. In September 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to repurchase 37,142 vested
shares at a price of $10.98 for a total of approximately $408,000 by reducing the note balance by that amount. Pursuant to certain provisions in the standard option agreement with the Vice President-North America Sales, the Company also repurchased
38,572 unvested shares at a price of $10.50 for approximately $405,000 by reducing the note balance by that amount. The remaining note balance of approximately $16,000 was offset by amounts owed to the Vice President-North America Sales.





At the time of the Vice President-Sales resignation, the Company had recorded approximately $451,000 for the note
and related interest that was subject to future forgiveness by reducing notes receivable from stockholders and charging deferred compensation. As a result of this resignation, the Company in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 reversed these amounts
and also recorded a reduction of approximately $142,000 in accelerated amortization of stock-based compensation related thereto.





Note
6.    Warrant Cancellation





In September 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with
a non-employee to cancel a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock. As a result of the cancellation, the Company recorded a reduction of amortization of stock-based compensation expense of approximately $144,000.





Note 7.    Subsequent Event





On November 1, 2002, the Company completed an acquisition of VeraTest, Inc., a private California corporation (VeraTest), primarily for the purpose of acquiring
their software for verification of chip design. The Company will account for this acquisition as an asset purchase. In accordance with the agreement and plan of reorganization, shortly before the acquisition, the Company purchased a portion of the
outstanding common stock held by certain shareholders for approximately $1.5 million, including the cancellation of indebtedness of certain VeraTest shareholders to the Company.





In connection with the completion of the acquisition, the VeraTest common shareholders have the right to receive 272,998 shares of Company common stock upon the completion
of certain milestones. Of these shares of common stock, 171,646 shares will be placed in escrow and will be released upon the completion of three milestone achievements20% for completion of the first milestone, 40% for completion of the second
milestone, and 40% for the completion of the third milestone. The remaining 101,352 shares are to be issued pursuant to a restricted stock grant and will vest on the same basis as the shares placed in escrow. The milestones are based upon testing
and integration of certain current features, as well as the development of additional working features of the software tool.




9




---

##### Table of Contents




Upon achievement of the milestones, the Company will recognize stock-based compensation expense related
to research and development equal to the fair value of the stock issued to the VeraTest shareholders on the date the milestones are met. These milestones are due annually through September 2004. If it is determined that any milestone has not been
attained the shares will be cancelled.




10




---

##### Table of Contents




|ITEM 2: |  | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in Item
1 of this report and the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and its consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002.





When used in this discussion, the words expects,
anticipates, believes, estimates and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements, which include statements as to anticipated sources of revenue, including Blast Fusion
and related products accounting for most of our revenue for the foreseeable future, revenue recognized from licenses expectations regarding the terms of future license agreements, decreases or increases in our operating expenditures in absolute
dollars or as a percentage of revenue, anticipated expansion of our customer base and the number and amount of our license agreements, anticipated growth in operations, our litigation strategy, the adoption of recent accounting pronouncements, our
anticipated business growth, our profitability, our reliance on a small number of customers, expansion of international operations and the geographic scope of our operations, adequacy of office space, our sales efforts, potential acquisitions or
business combinations, our intellectual property strategy, our competitors and the effects of consolidation in our target markets, fluctuations in the price of our common stock, adequacy of our capital resources, our administrative financial and
operating systems, procedures and controls, and the effects of market interest rates on our investments, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as well as risks relating the loss of a significant customer, our ability to sustain or increase profitability, customers not adopting new products, the possibility we will be unable to
gain additional market share, unanticipated expenditures, terrorist attacks and increased international tensions including in the Middle East, expenses related to litigation, market fluctuations, the failure of our internal controls and procedures,
our inability to integrate acquired businesses, consolidation in our industry, fluctuations of foreign currencies, and the matters discussed in Factors That May Affect Our Results. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.





Overview





We provide design and implementation software that enables chip designers to reduce the time it takes to design and produce complex deep submicron integrated circuits used
in the communications, computing, consumer electronics, networking and semiconductor industries. We were incorporated in Delaware in April 1997, and through the quarter ended December 31, 1999, we were primarily engaged in development-stage
activities, including developing our technology and products, recruiting personnel and raising capital. In April 1999, we shipped the first version of our initial product, Blast Fusion. In May 2000, we began shipping Blast Chip, which extends the
capabilities of Blast Fusion by adding RTL synthesis. In September 2001, we began shipping Blast Plan, which enables hierarchical planning and partitioning of a design into large blocks that can be implemented individually and later assembled to
create a complex chip or system-on-a-chip. In January 2002, we began shipping Diamond SI, a post-layout verification tool based in part on technology obtained through our merger with Moscape.





Sources of Revenue





We generate revenue from two
sources: software licenses and services. We derive software license revenue from our design and implementation software products, which include Blast Fusion, Blast Chip, and Blast Plan. We have generated revenue from our analysis and verification
software products, Blast Noise, CircuitScope, GateScope, and most recently Diamond SI. We have discontinued the development, marketing and licensing of CircuitScope and are not actively marketing GateScope. However, our new Diamond SI product is
based in part on Moscapes GateScope technology. Diamond SI is a stand-alone system and is suitable for use with either Magma or non-Magma chip design flows.





We derive services revenue primarily from:





| |  |  | consulting, training and maintenance for our design and implementation software products; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






11




---

##### Table of Contents




| |  |  | maintenance revenue from our analysis and verification software products.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------




Our standard license agreements include maintenance. Our perpetual license agreements and our time-based unbundled license agreements generally include maintenance for a
one-year period.





Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





We consider the following accounting policies related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and contingencies to be critical policies due to the
estimation processes involved in each.





Revenue Recognition





We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, as modified by SOP 98-9. SOP 97-2, as modified,
generally requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software products, upgrades, enhancements, maintenance, installation and training to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of the
elements. The fair value of an element must be based on evidence that is specific to the vendor. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and maintenance is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for
the license arrangement is recognized over the term of the agreement. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method.
Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred until the delivery of the element and the remaining portion of the license fee is recognized as revenue.





License revenue





We derive
license revenue primarily from our design and implementation software and, to a much lesser extent, from our analysis and verification products. We license our products under time-based and perpetual licenses.





License revenue is recognized after the execution of a license agreement and the delivery of the product to the customer, provided that
there are no uncertainties surrounding the product acceptance, fees are fixed and determinable, collectibility is probable and there are no remaining obligations other than maintenance. For licenses where vendor-specific objective evidence of fair
value (VSOE) for maintenance exists, license revenue is recognized up front using the residual method. As a result, license revenue is recognized in the period in which the license agreement is executed assuming all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. For licenses where VSOE for maintenance does not exist, license revenue is generally recognized ratably over the maintenance period, or when extended payments exist, based on the lower of amounts due and payable or
ratably over the contract period.





Prior to June 30, 2001, we bundled maintenance into our time-based license
agreements for our design and implementation software products for the entire license term, and consequently VSOE of fair value did not exist for each element of the arrangement. For our bundled license agreements, where the only undelivered element
is maintenance, we recognize revenue ratably over the contract term. If an arrangement involves extended payment terms, that is, where less than 80% is due in one year from the contract date, we recognize revenue to the extent of the lesser of the
portion of the fee presently due and payable or the ratable portion of the entire fee. These revenue recognition practices apply to bundled license agreements entered into both before and after June 30, 2001.





In addition to continuing to offer time-based licenses bundled with maintenance, starting in the quarter ended September 30, 2001, we
unbundled maintenance from some of our time-based licenses by including maintenance for only the first year of the license term. Thereafter, maintenance on these agreements can be renewed by the customer at the rate stated in the agreements. In
these unbundled licenses, the aggregate renewal period is greater than the initial bundled maintenance period. We also began offering perpetual licenses in the quarter ended September 30, 2001 with maintenance included only for the first year and
renewable thereafter. The renewal rate is VSOE of the fair value of maintenance in both our unbundled time-based and perpetual licenses. Where the only undelivered element is maintenance, we recognize license revenue using the residual method. If an
arrangement involves extended payment terms, revenue recognized using the residual method is limited to amounts due and payable.




12




---

##### Table of Contents




Services revenue





We derive services revenue primarily from consulting and training for our design and implementation software products and from maintenance provided under our unbundled
time-based and perpetual license agreements for our design and implementation software products, and to a lesser extent from maintenance of our analysis and verification software products. Our standard perpetual license agreement and our unbundled
time-based license agreements include maintenance, generally for a one-year period. Services revenue from maintenance arrangements is recognized on a straight-line basis over the maintenance term. After the initial maintenance term, maintenance can
be renewed annually at the renewal rate specified in the agreement. Because we have VSOE of fair value for consulting and training services, revenue is recognized when these services are delivered.





Allowance for doubtful accounts





Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for
doubtful accounts in any accounting period. The allowances reflect our best estimate as of the reporting dates. Changes may occur in the future, which may make us reassess the collectibility of amounts and at which time we may need to provide
additional allowances in excess of that currently provided.





Contingencies





Because we are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims, we are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accruals required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue.





Results of Operations





The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain financial data as a percentage of total revenue:





Three Months Ended September 30,


Six Months Ended September 30,2002


2001


2002


2001Revenue:Licenses

83
%

85
%

78
%

84
%Services

17


15


22


16Total revenue

100


100


100


100Cost of revenue

19


19


17


23Gross margin

81


81


83


77Operating expenses:Research and development

25


45


27


55Sales and marketing

39


58


36


67General and administrative

12


12


12


17Stock-based compensation

4


12


8


14Total operating expenses

80


128


83


153Operating income (loss)

1


(47
)

0


(76
)Interest income (expense), net

4


(4
)

3


(2
)Net income (loss) before income taxes

5


(51
)

3


(78
)Income taxes

(1
)

(1
)

(1
)

(1
)Net income (loss)

4


(52
)

2


(79
)Less: preferred stock dividend




(60
)




(35
)Net income (loss) attributed to common shareholders

4
%

(112
)%

2
%

(114
)%







13




---

##### Table of Contents




Revenue





Revenue increased from $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $17.8 million, or 85%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Of the $17.8
million of revenue recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2002, approximately $14.7 million is license revenue. Revenue increased from $16.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2001 to $35.9 million or 121% for the six
months ended September 30, 2002 due to the increases in both license and service revenue. While to date we have focused primarily on time-based license agreements on which revenue has been recognized over the contract period, we also began to enter
into perpetual licenses and unbundled time-based license agreements during the quarter ended September 30, 2001. Certain significant contracts with extended payment terms entered into in recent quarters provide for payments which are weighted
towards the latter part of the contract term. Accordingly, as the payment terms are extended, the revenue from these contracts is not recognized evenly over the contract term, but is recognized as the lesser of the cumulative amounts due and payable
or ratably, at each period end. Revenue recognized under these arrangements will be higher in the latter part of the contract term. Our ability to recognize revenue in the future on these contracts will be subject to the customers continuing
credit-worthiness. For the six months ended September 30, 2002, revenue from contracts entered into before fiscal year 2003 accounted for approximately 86% of our total revenue. Although we plan to enter into both bundled and unbundled time-based
license agreements and perpetual license agreements in the future, we expect to derive the majority of our revenue in the foreseeable future from unbundled time-based license agreements.





License revenue





License
revenue increased from $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $14.7 million or 79% for the three months ended September 30, 2002. License revenue increased from $13.6 million for the six months ended September 30, 2001 to
$28.1 million or 107% for the six months ended September 30, 2002. These increases were primarily due to an increase in license revenue from our design and implementation software products, specifically from Blast Fusion and to a lesser extent from
Blast Chip. In addition, beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2001, we began to recognize revenue under perpetual and unbundled time-based license agreements using the residual method under which revenue recognition is accelerated. For the
three months and six months ended September 30, 2002, $15.8 million and $30.8 million, respectively, were derived from contracts entered into during these respective periods.





Services revenue





Services
revenue increased from $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $3.1 million, or 116% for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the six months ended September 30, 2001 and 2002, service revenue was $2.7 million and $7.8
million, respectively. These increases were primarily due to consulting services provided to licensees of our design and implementation software products.





Cost of Revenue





Cost of revenue consists primarily
of cost of license revenue and, to a lesser extent, cost of consulting services for our design and implementation software products. Cost of revenue, as just described, consists primarily of salary and related costs for engineers associated with
technical services, including quality assurance, and cost of engineers associated with post-contract customer support and consulting services. To date, the cost of service revenue for analysis and verification products has been insignificant. Cost
of revenue increased in absolute dollars from $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, but remained unchanged at 19% of total revenue. For the six months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, cost of revenue increased from $6.2 million to$3.7 million, respectively. These increases in absolute dollars are primarily due to costs associated with additional support required by our expanding customer base combined
with costs related to increased design services. The cost of sales relating to design services increased as a result of increased services revenue. In addition, the Company at the beginning of the three months ended September 30, 2002 transferred
all research and development employees in design services to cost of sales because such employees will only perform work on customer related activities.





Operating Expenses





Research and development





Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries, bonuses and benefits of engineering
personnel, depreciation of engineering equipment, and outside engineering services from contractors and consultants. Research and




14




---

##### Table of Contents




development expense increased from $4.3 million or 45% of total revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2001 to $4.4 million or 25% of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, research and development expenses were $9.8 million or 27% of total revenue and $8.9
million or 55% of total revenue, respectively. The six-month increase was primarily due to increases in outside service expense and payroll related expenses due to an increase in personnel. In addition, the Company at the beginning of the three
months ended September 30, 2002 transferred all research and development employees in design services to cost of sales because such employees will only perform work on customer related activities. Development costs incurred in the research and
development of new technology and enhancements to existing technology are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. To date, capitalized costs for our software development have not been
material. Although we expect research and development expense to increase in absolute dollars and that these expenses will fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue, our objective is to reduce these expenses as a percentage of total revenue over
time.





Sales and marketing





Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries, sales commissions, bonuses, benefits and related costs of sales and marketing personnel, tradeshows and other
marketing activities. Sales and marketing expense increased from $5.6 million or 58% of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $6.9 million or 39% of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the six
months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, sales and marketing expenses were $12.9 million or 36% of total revenue and $10.9 million or 67% of total revenue, respectively. The six month increase of $2.0 million was primarily due to an increase in
payroll related expenses of $0.3 million, a reversal of $0.7 million in accrued commissions in the first quarter of last fiscal year resulting from a termination of a distribution agreement, $0.2 million in travel expenses and $0.4 million in
support services. Although we expect sales and marketing expense to increase in absolute dollars and that these expenses will fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue, our objective is to reduce these expenses as a percentage of total revenue over
time.





General and administrative





General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, bonuses, benefits and related costs of finance and administrative personnel and outside service expenses
including legal, accounting and recruiting services. General and administrative expense increased from $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, but remained unchanged
at 12% of total revenue. For the six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, general and administrative expenses were $4.3 million or 12% of total revenue and $2.7 million or 17% of total revenue, respectively. Of the net six-month increase of
$1.6 million, outside services increased by $1.0 million, insurance expense increased by $0.3 million, and bad debt expense increased by $0.4 million. These costs were partially offset by a decrease of $0.1 million in payroll related expenses.
Although we expect general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars and that these expenses will fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue, our objective is to reduce these expenses as a percentage of total revenue over time.





Amortization of stock-based compensation





Stock-based compensation expense consists of the amortization of deferred stock-based compensation resulting from the grant of stock
options at exercise prices less than the fair value of the underlying common stock on the grant date for officers and employees and the fair value of the stock options granted to consultants and other non-employees. The options generally vest over
four years, with 25% vesting after one year and then ratably over the remaining 36 months. Amortization of stock-based compensation was $0.7 million or 4% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and $1.2 million or 12% of total
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2001. For the six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, amortization of stock-based compensation was $2.6 million or 8% of total revenue and $2.3 million or 14% of total revenue, respectively. Of
the decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2002, $0.4 million is due to the revaluation and cancellation of a warrant to purchase the Companys common stock, which was being accounted for under the variable accounting method, and
$0.1 million relates to the reversal of accelerated amortization of stock-based compensation related to the Vice President-Sales who resigned in September 2002.





Interest Income (Expense), Net





Interest income
(expense), net was $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and ($0.4) million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. For the six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, interest income (expense), net was $1.0 million and
($0.4) million, respectively. Interest income increased from $0.2 million for the three




15




---

##### Table of Contents




months ended September 30, 2001 to $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. For the
six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, interest income was $1.0 million and $0.2 million. These increases in interest income were the result of investing the significant increase in cash and cash equivalents, primarily from our November 2001
initial public offering. The three and six months ended September 30, 2001 included a non-cash charge of $0.5 million related to the $25.0 million subordinated convertible promissory notes issued in July and August 2001.





Income Taxes





From inception through September 30, 2002, we incurred a cumulative net loss for federal and state tax purposes and have not recognized any tax benefit. We are in a net deferred tax asset position, which has been fully
reserved. We will continue to provide a valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets until it becomes more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be realized. For the three months and six months ended September 30, 2002, we had
a provision for income taxes of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2001, we had provision for income taxes of $0.1 million for each period.





Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





The certification by the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer of this report on Form 10-Q, as required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), has been submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission as additional correspondence accompanying this report.





Legal Matters





We are a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County, California
Superior Court, which alleges breach of contract, concealment, undisclosed conflict of interest, promissory fraud and misrepresentation arising out of an OEM distribution agreement. The plaintiffs second amended complaint filed in September
2002 seeks damages of $14.7 million, as well as other damages from any gains, profits and advantages lost and punitive damages.





The plaintiff, Prolific, Inc., filed its initial complaint in August 2001 and its first amended complaint in May 2002. The first amended complaint named us and our Chief Executive Officer, Rajeev Madhavan, as defendants. We filed a
cross-complaint against the plaintiff in December 2001, alleging breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of express warranty and negligent misrepresentation. The Court sustained defendants demurrer
on seven of the eight causes of action at issue in plaintiffs first amended complaint, including all causes of action against Mr. Madhavan. The plaintiffs second amended complaint does not restate most of these causes of action, such as
certain wrongful interference claims, and does not name Mr. Madhavan as a defendant. Accordingly, on September 18, 2002, the Court dismissed the case against Mr. Madhavan with prejudice.





No trial date has been set. Although we cannot predict the eventual outcome of the litigation at this time, we believe the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously
defend ourselves against all plaintiffs allegations. No estimate of a loss or range of loss upon resolution of the lawsuit can be made at this time.





We may be subject to various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





As of September 30, 2002, cash and cash equivalents were
$91.5 million, and working capital was $89.9 million.





Net cash used in operating activities was $0.2 million for
the six months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $10.0 million for the six months ended September 30, 2001. Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended September 30, 2001 was primarily due to net loss for the period. Cash flow
from operating activities for fiscal 2003 and 2002 was also affected by changes in accounts receivable, accounts payable, deferred revenue, accrued expenses, and accounts payable and amortization of deferred stock-based compensation. In addition,
significant non-cash related adjustments for the six months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 included depreciation and amortization of $2.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, amortization of stock-based compensation of $2.6
million and $2.3 million, respectively, and provision for doubtful accounts of $0.4 million and $0, respectively.




16




---

##### Table of Contents




Net cash provided by investing activities was $11.0 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2002, compared to $1.6 million used for the six months ended September 30, 2001. Of the cash provided in investing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2002, $13.5 million was from the proceeds from the sale of
short-term investments and $2.0 million was used for purchases of property and equipment. For the six months ended September 30, 2001, $1.7 million cash was used for purchases of property and equipment.





Cash provided by financing activities was $2.3 million and $23.8 million for the six months September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001,
respectively. Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2002, consisted primarily of cash received through the exercise of stock options and shares issued through stock purchase plans. In the six months ended
September 30, 2001, the cash provided was primarily from the proceeds of the issuance of subordinated notes and warrants of $24.8 million. Such proceeds were partially offset by $0.4 million used for the repurchase of subsidiary stock and $0.7
million used for the repayment of notes payable to bank.





As of September 30, 2002, our principal source of
liquidity consisted of $91.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating and working capital expenditure requirements in the ordinary course of
business for at least the next 12 months. If we require additional capital resources to grow our business internally or to acquire complementary technologies and businesses at any time in the future, we may use cash or need to sell additional equity
or debt securities. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities may result in more dilution to our existing stockholders. Financing arrangements may not be available to us, or may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable
to us.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal
of long-lived assets. While SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121. SFAS 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting
provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions
(APB 30), for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirement in APB 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by
sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. SFAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Our adoption of SFAS 144 effective April 1,
2002, did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.





In April 2002, the FASB
issued SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections Business Combinations. The provisions of SFAS 145, related to the rescission of SFAS 4, are effective for fiscal
years beginning after May 15, 2002, and the provisions related to SFAS 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. SFAS 145 rescinds SFAS 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, SFAS 64,
Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements, and SFAS 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers. SFAS 145 also amends SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency
between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS 145 also amends other existing authoritative
pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. We do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.





In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, which addresses costs associated with an exit activity (including restructuring) or with disposal of long-lived assets. Those activities can include eliminating or reducing product lines, terminating employees and contracts, and
relocating plant facilities and personnel. The provisions of SFAS 146 will not supersede the accounting requirements for costs to restructure operations acquired in a business combination. Under SFAS 146, a company will record a liability for a cost
associated with an exit or disposal activity when that liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. The new requirements are effective prospectively for exit and disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. A company may not
restate its previously issued financial statements. SFAS 146 also grandfathers the accounting for liabilities that a company had previously recorded under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other




17




---

##### Table of Contents




Costs to Exit and Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). We will adopt
SFAS 146 effective January 1, 2003 and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.





Factors That May Affect Our Results





Except for the first two quarters of fiscal 2003, we have a history of
losses and an accumulated deficit of approximately $120.9 million as of September 30, 2002. If we do not sustain or increase profitability in the future, we may not be able to continue to operate.





We have incurred net losses of approximately $120.9 million as of September 30, 2002. Although we achieved profitability in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2003, if we do not sustain or increase profitability in the future at a level expected by securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock will likely decline. If we incur net losses, we may not be able to
maintain or increase our number of employees or our investment in capital equipment, sales, marketing, and research and development programs, and we may not be able to continue to operate.





Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.





We were incorporated in April 1997 and introduced our first principal software product, Blast Fusion, in April 1999. Our business model is still emerging, and the revenue and income potential of our
business and market are unproven. We have a limited history of generating revenue from our software products. As a result of our short operating history, we have limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our business. Our software products
represent a new approach to the challenges presented in the electronic design automation market, which to date has been dominated by established companies with longer operating histories. Key markets within the electronic design automation industry
may fail to adopt our proprietary technologies and software products, or we may not be able to establish distribution channels. Any evaluation of our business and our prospects must be considered in light of our limited operating history and the
risks and uncertainties often encountered by companies in their early stages of development.





Our lengthy sales cycle is unpredictable
and can range from three to nine months or more. This lengthy and unpredictable sales cycle makes it difficult for us to forecast revenue and increases the variability of quarterly fluctuations, which could cause our stock price to decline.





Customers for electronic design automation software typically commit significant resources to evaluate
available software. The complexity of our products requires us to spend substantial time and effort to assist potential customers in evaluating our software tools and in benchmarking our tools against those of our competitors. Also, because our
products require a significant investment of time and cost by our customers, we must target those individuals within the customers organization who are able to make these decisions on behalf of their companies. These individuals tend to be
senior management in an organization, typically at the vice president level. We may face difficulty identifying and establishing contact with such individuals. Even after initial acceptance, the negotiation and documentation processes can be
lengthy. Our sales cycle typically ranges between three and nine months or more. Any delay in completing sales in a particular quarter could cause our operating results to be below expectations.





We have relied and expect to continue to rely on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, and our revenue could decline due to the delay of customer orders
or the failure of existing customers to renew licenses or if we are unable to maintain or develop relationships with current or potential customers.





Our business and financial condition depends on a limited number of customers. In the six months ended September 30, 2002, two customers accounted for approximately 26% of our revenue, with each of
these customers accounting for over 10% of our total revenue for that period. Three customers accounted for approximately 38% of our revenue in the six months ended September 30, 2001, with each of these customers accounting for at least 10% of our
total revenue for that period.





We expect that we will continue to depend upon a relatively small number of
customers for a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. If we fail to successfully sell our products and services to one or more customers in any particular period, or a large customer purchases less of our products or
services, defers its orders, or fails to renew its relationship with us, our business and operating results would be harmed.





We license our software products to our customers and provide technical support. Most of our customers license our software under a three-year licensing agreement. Most of our licensing agreements automatically expire at the end of
the term




18




---

##### Table of Contents




unless the customer renews the license with us or purchases a perpetual license. As many of our
licensing agreements are still within their initial term, we cannot predict what the renewal rate may be. If our customers do not renew their licenses, we may not be able to maintain our current revenue or may not generate additional revenue. Some
of our licensing agreements allow those customers to terminate an agreement prior to its expiration under limited circumstances; for example, if our products do not meet specified performance requirements or goals. We expect a significant amount of
our revenue to be generated from these licensing agreements. If these agreements are terminated prior to expiration or we are unable to collect under these agreements, our revenue may decline.





Certain significant contracts with extended payment terms entered into in recent quarters provide for payments which are weighted towards the latter part of the
contract term. Accordingly, as the payment terms are extended, the revenue from these contracts is not recognized evenly over the contract term, but is recognized as the lesser of the cumulative amounts due and payable or ratably, at each period
end. Revenue recognized under these arrangements will be higher in the latter part of the contract term. Our ability to recognize revenue in the future on these contracts will be subject to the customers continuing credit-worthiness.





Because many of our current competitors have pre-existing relationships with our current and potential customers,
we might not be able to achieve sufficient market penetration to achieve or sustain profitability. Many of our competitors, including Cadence and Synopsys, have established relationships with our current and potential customers and can devote
substantial resources aimed at preventing us from establishing or enhancing our customer relationships. These existing relationships can also make it difficult for us to obtain additional customers due to the substantial investment that these
potential customers have already made in their current design flows. If we are unable to gain additional market share due to these pre-existing relationships with our potential customers, our operating results could be harmed.





Our quarterly results are difficult to predict, and if we do not meet quarterly financial expectations, our stock price could decline.





Our quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate from quarter to
quarter. It is likely that our operating results in some quarters will be below market expectations. If this happens, the market price of our common stock is likely to decline. Fluctuations in our future quarterly operating results may be caused by
many factors, including:





| |  |  | size and timing of customer orders;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------




| |  |  | the structure and mix of our product license agreements;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | our ability to recognize revenue in a given quarter;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | timing of customer license payments;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------




| |  |  | time-based license agreements with graduated payment schedules that reflect phased deployment of our software and lower relative payments in the first year;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | the mix of time-based licenses bundled with maintenance, unbundled time-based license agreements and perpetual license agreements;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | the mix of our license and services revenue agreements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | our ability to gain new customers and retain existing customers;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | changes in the level of our operating expenses to support any future growth;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or our competitors; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | changes in the interpretation of the authoritative literature under which we recognize revenue.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Although to date we have focused primarily on bundled time-based license agreements, we began to enter into perpetual and unbundled
time-based license agreements during the quarter ended September 30, 2001. Revenue under these agreements may be recognized using the residual method, which typically results in recognition of a larger amount of revenue in the quarter in which the
license is granted as compared to our standard time-based licenses. Our quarterly results will likely fluctuate as a result of the mix of license agreements. We recognize revenue from our bundled time-based licenses over the term of the agreement,
which is typically three years, once the license has been signed and the product delivered. If an




19




---

##### Table of Contents




arrangement involves extended payment terms, revenue is recognized to the extent of the lesser of the
portion of the fee presently due and payable or the ratable portion of the entire fee.





Our operating results will be significantly
harmed if chip designers do not adopt Blast Fusion.





Blast Fusion has accounted for a significant majority of
our revenue since inception. We believe that revenue from Blast Fusion and related products will account for most of our revenue for the foreseeable future. If integrated circuit designers do not adopt Blast Fusion, our operating results would be
significantly harmed. We must continue market penetration of Blast Fusion to achieve our growth strategy.





Our
products are not applicable to all design processes. For example, our products are not applicable to functions such as logic simulation, formal verification or full-feature custom layout editing, analog, or mixed signal. Although some of our
customers use front-end products, most of our customers license Blast Fusion to do the physical design step of designing an integrated circuit.





Defects in our products could result in a decrease of customers and revenue, unexpected expenses and loss of competitive market share.





Our products depend on complex software, both internally developed and licensed from third parties. Also, our customers may use our products with other companies products, which also contain
complex software. If the software we provide to customers does not meet performance requirements, our customer relationships may suffer. Complex software often contains errors. Any failure or poor performance of our software or the third party
software with which it is integrated could result in:





| |  |  | delayed market acceptance of our software products;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | delays in product shipments;
| | - |  | ----------------------------




| |  |  | unexpected expenses and diversion of resources to identify the source of errors or to correct errors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | damage to our reputation;
| | - |  | -------------------------




| |  |  | delayed or lost revenue; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------




| |  |  | product liability claims.
| | - |  | -------------------------




Our product functions are often critical to our customers, especially because of the resources our customers expend on the design and fabrication of integrated circuits. Our current licensing agreements contain provisions to
provide for a limited warranty, which provides the customer with a right of refund for the license fees if we are unable to correct errors reported during the warranty period. If our contractual limitations are unenforceable in a particular
jurisdiction or if we are exposed to product liability claims that are not covered by insurance, a successful claim could harm our business. We currently do not carry product liability insurance. Also, a limited number of our contracts include
specified ongoing performance criteria. We expect a significant amount of our revenue to be generated from these licensing agreements. If our products fail to meet these criteria, it may lead to termination of these agreements and loss of future
revenue.





Difficulties in developing and achieving market acceptance of new products and delays in planned release dates of our
software products and upgrades may harm our business.





If we fail to develop additional products, our business
and operating results could suffer. We may not have the financial resources necessary to fund future innovations. Also, any revenue that we receive from enhancements or new generations of our proprietary software products may be less than the costs
of development. If we cannot successfully develop and market new products, or if we fail to do so in a timely manner, our reputation and ability to grow our business would suffer.




20




---

##### Table of Contents




A significant portion of our business is conducted internationally. This international concentration
could expose us to risks inherent to doing business internationally that could harm our business. We also intend to expand our international operations. If our revenue from this expansion does not exceed the expenses associated with this expansion,
our business and operating results could suffer.





We generated 29% and 30% of our total revenue from sales
outside North America for the three and six months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. While all of our international sales to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars, our international operating expenses have been denominated in foreign
currencies. As a result, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies could increase the relative costs of our overseas operations, which could reduce our operating margins.





The expansion of our international operations includes the maintenance of sales offices in dispersed locations in Europe, the Middle East,
and the Asia-Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific region includes Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the Peoples Republic of China. If our revenue from international operations does not exceed the expense of establishing and
maintaining our international operations, our business could suffer. Additional risks we face in conducting business internationally include:





| |  |  | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations across different geographic areas;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | changes in currency exchange rates and controls;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | unexpected changes in regulatory requirements that impose multiple conflicting tax laws and regulations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | the possible lack of financial and political stability in foreign countries that prevent overseas sales growth; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | the effects of the terrorist attacks in the United States and any related conflicts or similar events worldwide.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Future changes in accounting standards, specifically changes affecting revenue recognition, could cause adverse unexpected revenue fluctuations.





Future changes in accounting standards, specifically those affecting software revenue recognition, could
require us to change our methods of revenue recognition. These changes could result in deferral of revenue recognized in current periods to subsequent periods or in accelerated recognition of deferred revenue to current periods, each of which could
cause shortfalls in meeting the expectations of investors and securities analysts. Our stock price could decline as a result of any shortfall.





Our future success will depend on our ability to keep pace with the rapidly evolving technology standards of the semiconductor industry. If we are unable to keep pace with rapidly changing technology standards, our products could
be rendered obsolete, which would cause our operating results to decline.





The semiconductor industry has made
significant technological advances. In particular, recent advances in deep submicron technology have required electronic design automation companies to continuously develop new products and enhance existing products. The evolving nature of our
industry could render our existing products and services obsolete. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to:





| |  |  | enhance our existing products and services;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------




| |  |  | develop and introduce new products and services on a timely and cost-effective basis that will keep pace with technological developments and evolving industry
standards; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------




If we are unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to respond in a timely manner to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our business and
operating results could be seriously harmed.




21




---

##### Table of Contents




We may not be able to hire the number of engineering personnel required by our customers, which would
harm our ability to achieve our growth strategy. Also, because competition for qualified personnel is intense in our industry, we may not be able to recruit necessary personnel, which could impact the development or sales of our products.





We have experienced, and may continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled
engineers with appropriate qualifications to support our growth strategy. Our success depends on our ability to identify, hire, train and retain qualified engineering personnel with experience in integrated circuit design. Specifically, we need to
attract and retain field application engineers to work with our direct sales force to technically qualify new sales opportunities and perform design work to demonstrate our products capabilities to customers during the benchmark evaluation
process. Competition for qualified engineers is intense, particularly in the Silicon Valley where our headquarters are located. If we lose the services of a significant number of our engineers or we cannot hire additional engineers, we will be
unable to increase our sales or implement or maintain our growth strategy.





Our success will also depend on our
ability to attract and retain senior management, sales, marketing and other key personnel. Because of the intense competition for such personnel, it is possible that we will fail to retain our key technical and managerial personnel. If we are unable
to retain our existing personnel, or attract and train additional qualified personnel, our growth may be limited due to our lack of capacity to develop and market our products. This could harm the markets perception of our business and our
ability to achieve our business goals.





Our success is highly dependent on the technical, sales, marketing and managerial
contributions of key individuals, and we may be unable to recruit and retain these personnel.





Rajeev
Madhavan, our chief executive officer, Roy E. Jewell, our president and chief operating officer, and Hamid Savoj, our vice presidentproduct development, as well as our research and development, sales and marketing personnel, are critical to
our business. We do not have long-term employment agreements with our key employees, and we do not maintain any key person life insurance policies. If we lose the services of any of these key executives, our product development processes and sales
efforts could be slowed. We may also incur increased operating expenses and be required to divert the attention of other senior executives to search for their replacements. The integration of our new executives or any new personnel could disrupt our
ongoing operations.





If we fail to maintain competitive stock option packages for our employees, or if our stock declines materially
for a protracted period of time, we might have difficulty retaining our employees and our business may be harmed.





In todays competitive technology industry, employment decisions of highly skilled personnel are influenced by stock option packages, which offer incentives above traditional compensation only where there is a consistent,
long-term upward trend over time of a companys stock price. If our stock price declines due to market conditions, investors perceptions of the technology industry or managerial or performance problems we have, our stock option incentives
may lose value to key employees, and we may lose these employees or be forced to grant additional options to retain them. This in turn could result in:





| |  |  | immediate and substantial dilution to investors resulting from the grant of additional options necessary to retain employees; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | potential compensation charges against the company, which could negatively impact our operating results.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Fluctuations in our growth place a strain on our management systems and resources, and if we fail to manage the pace of our growth our business could be
harmed.





Periods of growth followed by efforts to realign costs when revenue growth is slower than anticipated
have placed a strain on our management, administrative and financial resources. Over time we have significantly expanded our operations in the United States and internationally, and we plan to continue to expand the geographic scope of our
operations. To pace the growth of our operations with the growth in our revenue, we must continue to improve administrative, financial and operations systems, procedures and controls. Failure to improve our internal procedures could result in a
disruption of our operations and harm to our business. If we are unable to manage our growth the execution of our business plan could be delayed. We believe we have sufficient office space to meet our current needs.




22




---

##### Table of Contents




We have incurred high customer engagement and support costs, and our gross margin may decrease if we
incur higher than expected costs associated with providing design and support services in the future.





Because
of the complexity of our products, we typically incur high field application engineering support costs to engage new customers and assist them in their evaluations of our products. If we fail to manage our customer engagement and support costs, our
operating results could suffer. In addition, our gross margin may decrease if we are unable to manage support costs associated with the mix of license and services revenue we generate. For example, increased demand by our customers for design and
support services may negatively impact our gross margins because of the costs associated with attracting and retaining the requisite engineering resources to provide these services. It is also difficult to predict the cost and schedule of the
support required under services agreements with complex technical objectives. We may enter into contracts that result in losses because the cost of resources to complete the agreement exceeds the contract price. Failure by us to perform under the
terms of our agreements may cause us to lose customers and revenue.





We may have difficulty assimilating technology, personnel and
operations from any recent and future acquisitions, and these difficulties may disrupt our business and divert managements attention.





In November 2002 we purchased the assets of VeraTest. We may have difficulty integrating VeraTests technology with our technology, and we many not be able to retain VeraTests technical
personnel after the acquisition. The Moscape merger was our first merger, and we have discontinued the development, marketing and licensing of Moscapes CircuitScope product line and have also discontinued the marketing and licensing of
GateScope as a separate product. We may pursue other acquisitions that we believe may complement our business. If we do acquire additional companies, the integration of the separate operations of our company and an acquisition partner may result in
problems related to integration of technology and management teams, either of which could divert managements attention from the day-to-day operations of the combined company. Also, we may not be able to retain key management, technical and
sales personnel after an acquisition. We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of the VeraTest acquisition or future acquisitions.





Our products incorporate software licensed from third parties, and if we lose or are unable to maintain any of these software licenses, our product shipments could be delayed or reduced.





We use software, such as front-end language processing, license keying software and schematic viewing software, which we license from
third parties. We have also licensed the rights to some technologies from various universities, including the Technical University of Eindhoven, Delft University and the University of California, Berkeley. These third-party software licenses may not
continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we cannot maintain existing third party technology licenses or enter into licenses for other existing or future technologies needed for our products, we could be required to
cease or delay product shipments while we seek to develop alternative technologies.





If chip designers and manufacturers do not
integrate our software into existing design flows, or if other software companies do not cooperate in working with us to interface our products with their design flows, demand for our products may decrease.





To successfully implement our business strategy, we must provide products that can interface with the software of other electronic design
automation software companies. Our competitors may not support our or our customers efforts to integrate our products into their existing design flows. We must develop cooperative relationships with competitors so that they will work with us
to integrate our software into a customers design flow. Currently, our software is designed to interface with the existing software of Avant!, Cadence, Synopsys and others. If we are unable to convince customers to adopt our software products
over those of competitors offering a broader set of products, or if we are unable to convince other semiconductor companies to work with us to interface our software with theirs to meet the demands of chip designers and manufacturers, our business
and operating results will suffer.





We may not obtain sufficient patent protection, which could harm our competitive position and
increase our expenses.





Our success and ability to compete depends to a significant degree upon the protection
of our software and other proprietary technology. Currently, seven of our patent applications have been allowed and we have nine patent applications pending in the United States, including one provisional patent application. Certain of these patent
applications are also pending in foreign jurisdictions, and one patent application has been allowed in a foreign jurisdiction. These legal protections afford only limited protection for our technology, and the rights that may be granted under any
future patents that may be




23




---

##### Table of Contents




issued may not provide competitive advantages to us. Patent protection in foreign countries may be
limited or unavailable where we need this protection. It is possible that:





| |  |  | our pending patent applications may not be issued;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | competitors may independently develop similar technologies or design around our patents;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | patents issued to us may not be broad enough to protect our proprietary rights; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | any issued patent could be successfully challenged.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------




We rely on trademark, copyright and trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights, and if these rights are not sufficiently protected, it could harm our ability to compete and generate
revenue.





We also rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, and contractual
restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and licenses, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. Our ability to compete and grow our business could suffer if these rights are not adequately protected. We seek to protect our source
code for our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. We license our software pursuant to agreements, which impose certain restrictions on the licensees ability to utilize the software. We also
seek to avoid disclosure of our intellectual property by requiring employees and consultants with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements. Our proprietary rights may not be adequately protected because:





| |  |  | laws and contractual restrictions may not prevent misappropriation of our technologies or deter others from developing similar technologies; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | policing unauthorized use of our products and trademarks is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to determine the extent of this
unauthorized use.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Also, the laws of other countries in which we market our products may offer
little or no protection of our proprietary technologies. Reverse engineering, unauthorized copying or other misappropriation of our proprietary technologies could enable third parties to benefit from our technologies without paying us for it, which
would harm our competitive position and market share.





We may face intellectual property infringement or other claims against us or
our customers that could be costly to defend and result in our loss of significant rights.





Many of our
contracts contain provisions indemnifying our customers from third party intellectual property infringement claims. Other parties may assert intellectual property infringement claims against us or our customers, and our products may infringe the
intellectual property rights of third parties. We have also acquired software as a result of our acquisitions, including our recent acquisition of VeraTest, and we may be subject to claims that such software infringes the intellectual property
rights of third parties. If we become involved in litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights and incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and could divert managements
attention from our business. If there is a successful claim of infringement, we may be required to develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or license agreements, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure
to develop non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis would harm our business. Our products may infringe third-party patents that may relate to our products. Also, we may be unaware of filed patent applications
that relate to our software products.





We may also become involved in litigation unrelated to intellectual
property infringement claims. For example, in August 2001, a complaint was filed against us alleging breach of contract, among other things. A more detailed description of this litigation appears under the heading Legal Proceedings. We
may not be successful in defending this or other claims. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can result in substantial expense and could divert the efforts of our management and technical personnel.




24




---

##### Table of Contents




We compete against companies that hold a large share of the electronic design automation market. If
we cannot compete successfully, we will be unable to gain market share.





We currently compete with companies
that hold dominant shares in the electronic design automation market, such as Cadence and Synopsys. These companies are continuing to broaden their product lines to provide an integrated design flow. Each of these companies has a longer operating
history and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, as well as greater name recognition and larger installed customer bases than we do. Our competitors are better able to offer aggressive discounts on their products, a
practice that they often employ. Our competitors offer a more comprehensive range of products than we do and they are often able to respond more quickly or price more effectively to take advantage of new opportunities or customer requirements.
Synopsys recently acquired Avant!, and further consolidation in the electronic design automation market could result in an increasingly competitive environment. Competitive pressures may prevent us from obtaining market share, require us to reduce
the price of products and services or cause us to lose existing customers, which could harm our business. Our competitors have a significant market presence in North America. To successfully execute our business strategy, we must continue to
increase our sales in North America. If we fail to do so in a timely manner or at all, we may not be able to gain market share and our business and operating results could suffer.





Also, a variety of small companies continue to emerge, developing and introducing new products. Any of these companies could become a significant competitor in the future.
We also compete with the internal chip design automation development groups of our existing and potential customers. Therefore, these customers may not require, or may be reluctant to purchase, products offered by independent vendors.





Our competitors may announce new products or technologies that have the potential to replace our existing or new product
offerings. The introduction of these new products by competitors may cause potential customers to defer purchases of our products. If we fail to compete successfully, we will not gain market share and our business will fail.





If the industries into which we sell our products experience recession or other cyclical effects impacting our customers research and development
budgets, our operating results could be negatively impacted.





Demand for our products is driven by new
integrated circuit design projects. The demand from semiconductor and system companies is uncertain and difficult to predict. Slower growth in the semiconductor and systems industries, a reduced number of design starts, reduction of electronic
design automation budgets or continued consolidation among our customers would harm our business and financial condition. We have experienced slower growth in revenue than we anticipated as a result of the recent downturn in the semiconductor and
systems industries.





The primary customers for our products are companies in the communications, computing,
consumer electronics, networking and semiconductor industries. Any significant downturn in our customers markets, in particular, or in general economic conditions which result in the cutback of research and development budgets or the delay of
software purchases would likely result in a reduction in demand for our products and services and could harm our business. For example, the United States economy, including the semiconductor industry, is currently experiencing a slowdown, which has
negatively impacted and may continue to impact our business and operating results. Terrorist attacks in the United States and other worldwide events throughout the Middle East have increased uncertainty in the United States economy. If the economy
continues to decline as a result of the economic, political and social turmoil, existing customers may delay their implementation of our software products and prospective customers may decide not to adopt our software products, either of which could
negatively impact our business and operating results.





In addition, the markets for semiconductor products are
cyclical. In recent years, some Asian countries have experienced significant economic difficulties, including devaluation and instability, business failures and a depressed business environment. These difficulties triggered a significant downturn in
the semiconductor market, resulting in reduced budgets for chip design tools, which, in turn, negatively impacted us. We have experienced delayed orders and slower deployment of our products under new order as a result of reduced budgets for chip
design tools. In addition, the electronics industry has historically been subject to seasonal and cyclical fluctuations in demand for its products, and this trend may continue in the future. These industry downturns have been, and may continue to
be, characterized by diminished product demand, excess manufacturing capacity and subsequent erosion of average selling prices.




25




---

##### Table of Contents




Our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders own a substantial portion of our common
stock and this concentration of ownership may allow them to elect most of our directors and could delay or prevent a change in control of Magma.





Our directors, executive officers and stockholders who currently own over 5% of our common stock collectively beneficially own a substantial portion of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders,
if they vote together, will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, they may be able to elect most of our directors, delay or prevent a transaction in which stockholders might receive a premium
over the market price for their shares or prevent changes in control or management.





Our stock price may decline significantly because
of stock market fluctuations that affect the prices of technology stocks. A decline in our stock price could result in securities class action litigation against us, that could divert managements attention and harm our business.





The stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have adversely affected the
market prices of common stock of technology companies. These broad market fluctuations may reduce the market price of our common stock. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company after periods of
volatility in the market price of securities. We may in the future be a target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert managements attention and resources, which could harm our ability to
execute our business plan.





We may need additional capital and if funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to
hire and retain employees, fund our expansion or compete effectively.





We believe that our existing capital
resources will enable us to maintain our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, if our capital requirements vary materially from those currently planned, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. This financing may
not be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us and may be dilutive to existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to hire, train or retain employees, to fund
our expansion, take advantage of unanticipated opportunities, develop or enhance services or products, or respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.





Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware corporate law contain anti-takeover provisions which could delay or prevent a change in control even if the change in control would be
beneficial to our stockholders.





Delaware law, as well as our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, contain
anti-takeover provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our company, even if it were beneficial to the stockholders to do so. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares
of our common stock. These provisions:





| |  |  | authorize the issuance of preferred stock that can be created and issued by the Board of Directors without prior stockholder approval to increase the number of
outstanding shares and deter or prevent a takeover attempt;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | establish a classified Board of Directors requiring that not all members of the board be elected at one time;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | limit the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at
stockholder meetings.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and the
terms of our stock option plans may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company. Specifically, Section 203 prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with an interested stockholder for three years
after the date the stockholder became an interested stockholder unless specific conditions are met. Also, our stock option plans include change in control




26




---

##### Table of Contents




provisions that allow us to grant options or stock purchase rights that will become vested immediately
upon a change in control of us.





ITEM 3:    
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Interest Rate Risk





Our exposure to market risks for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2002, cash
and investment portfolio consisted of money market funds and other high-grade investments with maturities of less than 90 days. Due to the short-term nature of our investment portfolio, an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would not have a
material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio. Since we have the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be materially affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden
change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.





Foreign Currency Exchange Risk





We transact some portions of our business in various foreign currencies. Accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in
foreign currency exchange rates. This exposure is primarily related to operating expenses in the United Kingdom, Europe and Japan, which are denominated in the respective local currency. As of September 30, 2002, we had no hedging contracts
outstanding. We do not currently use financial instruments to hedge operating expenses in the United Kingdom and Japan denominated in the respective local currency. We assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on
an ongoing basis.





ITEM 4.    
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report, that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) were effective.





(b) Changes in internal controls. Although there have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of
their evaluation, including any corrective actions taken with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have identified certain areas to be strengthened with respect to
internal controls, such as implementation of additional reporting procedures.




27




---

##### Table of Contents




PART II: OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1:    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





We are a defendant in a lawsuit filed
in Santa Clara County, California Superior Court, which alleges breach of contract, concealment, undisclosed conflict of interest, promissory fraud and misrepresentation arising out of an OEM distribution agreement. The plaintiffs second
amended complaint filed in September 2002 seeks damages of $14.7 million, as well as other damages from any gains, profits and advantages lost and punitive damages.





The plaintiff, Prolific, Inc., filed its initial complaint in August 2001 and its first amended complaint in May 2002. The first amended complaint named us and our Chief
Executive Officer, Rajeev Madhavan, as defendants. We filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiff in December 2001, alleging breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of express warranty and negligent
misrepresentation. The Court sustained defendants demurrer on seven of the eight causes of action at issue in plaintiffs first amended complaint, including all causes of action against Mr. Madhavan. The plaintiffs second amended
complaint does not restate most of these causes of action, such as certain wrongful interference claims, and does not name Mr. Madhavan as a defendant. Accordingly, on September 18, 2002, the Court dismissed the case against Mr. Madhavan with
prejudice.





No trial date has been set. Although we cannot predict the eventual outcome of the litigation at this
time, we believe the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves against all plaintiffs allegations. No estimate of a loss or range of loss upon resolution of the lawsuit can be made at this time.





We may be subject to various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.





ITEM 4:    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





(a)    The registrants Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on August 29, 2002.





(b)    The meeting involved the election of two directors: Roy E. Jewell and Rajesh Parekh. The terms of officer of Class II directors Andreas Bechtolsheim and Mark W. Perry, and Class III directors Rajeev
Madhavan and S. Atiq Raza, continued beyond the annual meeting.





(c)    There were two matters
voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A brief description of each of these matters, and the results of the votes thereon, are as follows:





1.    Election of Directors





Nominee

For

WithheldRoy E. Jewell

16,756,078

2,113,501Rajesh Parekh

18,811,923

57,656





Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the
registrants auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2003.








For

Against

Abstain

Broker Non-Votes18,624,327

242,717

2,535

-0-




28




---

##### Table of Contents




ITEM 6:    EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K





(a)Exhibits.





Exhibit Number

Exhibit Description3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).3.2

Certificate of Correction to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).3.3

Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to Amendment No. 6 to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-60838)).4.2

Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 2001, by and among the Companys and the
parties who are signatories thereto (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).





(b) Reports on Form 8-K.





The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.




29




---

##### Table of Contents




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





Dated: November 15, 2002


MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.By

/s/    GREGORY C.
WALKERGregory C. Walker Vice President Finance
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Signatory)




30




---

##### Table of Contents




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Magma Design Automation,
Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of
a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and





c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and





6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: November 15, 2002


/s/    RAJEEV MADHAVAN Rajeev Madhavan Chief Executive Officer




31




---

##### Table of Contents




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Gregory C. Walker, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Magma Design Automation,
Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of
a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and





c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and





6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: November 15, 2002





/s/    GREGORY C. WALKERGregory C. Walker Chief Financial Officer







32




---

##### Table of Contents




EXHIBIT INDEX





TO





MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.





QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q





FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002





Exhibit Number

Exhibit Description3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).3.2

Certificate of Correction to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).3.3

Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to Amendment No. 6 to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-60838)).4.2

Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 2001, by and among the Companys and the
parties who are signatories thereto (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Companys Form10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed on June 28, 2002).




33