alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 18

                    LETTER RE: CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
     
  August 18, 1998    

  Elcor Corporation
  14643 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1000
  Dallas, Texas  75240-8871



  Re:  Form 10-K Report for the year ended June 30, 1998

  Gentlemen:

  This letter is written to meet requirements of Regulation S-K calling for
  a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
  change in accounting principle or practice.

  As of June 30, 1998, the company changed from the last-in, first-out
  method of accounting for inventories to the first-in, first-out method.
  According to the management of the company, this change was made to provide a
  better measurement of operating results.

  A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for
  determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable
  alternative principles has not been established by the accounting profession.
  Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in
  accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method.
  However, we have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
  financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our
  opinion stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

  We are of the opinion that the company's change in method of accounting is
  to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the
  reasons stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable
  under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion,
  we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your
  management.

  Very truly yours,


  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
  -----------------------
      Arthur Andersen LLP
Order entered September 22, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00410-CV 

IN RE THRESHER AND THRESHER, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05644 

ORDER 

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for 

writ of mandamus. 

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

 JUSTICE
*December 19,*2017

2017-Ohio-9107.]

2015-0277.

#### Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Haynes.

On application for reinstatement. Dawn Trinah Haynes, Attorney Registration No. 0074001, reinstated to the practice of law.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
No. 85-6829.

#### Paradiso *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Final Rule: Confidential Determinations for Part 98 DataMeeting Documentation: EPA –American Petroleum Institute (API) MeetingDateStaff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization (Attach list of allattendees names and emails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g.,applicability, reportingrequirements, etc.)Written CommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent toEPA-CCD3/2/11Jennifer Bohmanbohman.jennifer@epa.gov202-343-9548Judy Neason (Williams Co)Robert Nolan (ExxonMobil)Jena Martin (ExxonMobil)Dave Sander (Chevron)Patricia Richards (Marathon Oil)Miriam Conner (Shell Oil)Roger Martella (Sidley)Wayne D’Angelo (API)Khary Cauthen (API)Greg Scott (NPRA)Gina McCarthy, EPABeth Craig, EPABill Irving, EPAAmy Branning, EPAAmeeting was held todiscuss API’s concernsrelated to CBI issues.Commentspreviouslyprovided andsubmitted toDocket.NA
# C_2015146EN.01003102.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Turnhout — Belgium) — Openbaar Ministerie v Marc Emiel Melanie De Beuckeleer, Michiel Martinus Zeeuws, Staalbeton NV/SA

(Case C-56/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 146/39)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
No. 10-5755.

#### James W. King, Petitioner v. Iowa Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 966, 131 S. Ct. 499,

178 L. Ed. 2d 296,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8043.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 598 F.3d 1051.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: July 13, 2010   /s/ Richard A. Pomije____________ Richard A. Pomije CEO            Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: July 13, 2010   /s/ Paul R. Gramstad____________ Paul R. Gramstad CFO
AIR RESOURCES BOARD

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Ventura County APCD Rule No.: 26.1 3 Date A dopte d: November 10 , 2015

Rule Title: New Source Review

– Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)

Date Submitted to ARB: November 30

, 20 1 5 If an Amended Rule, Date Las t Amended: Adopted June 28, 2011

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) No If NO, do not complete remainder of form.

District Contact: Tyler Harris Phone No.: 805 /645

- 140 7

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Ru le Changes: ( X ) Amended Rule : Amendments to Rule 26.1 3 will address deficiencies identified

by U.S. EPA so they will delegate federal PSD permitting authority to Ventura County APCD

. Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 PM10 CO TA C Lead

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach referen ce(s) for emission factor(s) and other

information. Attach calculation sheet showing how th e emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease ( X ) N/A No impact on emissions.

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP (Control Measure) for this source category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate:

Year Tons/year

Reductions 20 12 Baseline

Tons/year

Subject to Rule Control

Level Percent

Control Control

Level Control FactorAIR RESOURCES BOARD

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 2

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( X ) Attainment (Rule applies only to attainment criteria pollutants) ( ) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Numb er of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: None

Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not Applicable

Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: Five existing major sources Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not Applicable

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECH NOLOGY

Do the Rule s Include Emission L imits that are Continuous? N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

Rule 26.13

– New Source Review

– Prevention of Significant Deterioration

Applicability Section B

Incorporation by Reference Section C

Requirements Section D

Public Participation Section E

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: Amended Rule 26.1 3 applies only to new major sources or modifications of existing major sources of attainment

cri teria pollutants. Therefore, amendments to Rule 26.13 will not affect RFP

.
No. 10-7680.

#### Robert Lloyd, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1158, 131 S. Ct. 958,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 72.

178 L. Ed. 2d 790,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 179.
# C_2016243EN.01001001.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Gemeente Borsele v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Gemeente Borsele

(Case C-520/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 2(1)(c) and 9(1) - Taxable persons - Economic activities - Definition - Transport of schoolchildren))

(2016/C 243/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gemeente Borsele, Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicants:

Defendants: Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Gemeente Borsele

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a regional or local authority which provides a service for the transport of schoolchildren under conditions such as those described in the main proceedings does not carry out an economic activity and is not therefore a taxable person.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors

The TitanCorporation:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by referencee in registration statements Nos.33-4041, 33-9570, 33-12119, 33-15680, 33-37827, 33-56762, 33-65123, 33-83402,333-07413, 333-10919, 333-10965, 333-30947, 333-57651, 333-66149, 333-47633,333-66147, 333-67341, 333-68621, 333-90133, 333-90139, 333-35102, 333-35274,333-35274, 333-41140, 333-41138, 333-63274, 333-66980, 333-70912, 333-85668,333-103751, 333-81694 and 333-85668 of The Titan Corporation and subsidiariesof our report dated March 9, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of The Titan Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of The Titan Corporation.

 

Our report refers to achange in the Company’s method of accounting for goodwill in 2002, as discussedin note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, and a reference to thereports of other auditors.

 

/s/KPMG

 

San Diego, California

March 9, 2004

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 26, 2020

No. 04-20-00116-CR

Anton Jamail HARRIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR3427

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a third motion for extension of time to file his brief. 

Appellant’s motion presents extenuating circumstances. Therefore, the motion 

is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before November 20, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

Clerk of Court
No. 10-7267.

#### Joseph Russell, Petitioner v. Thomas LaValley, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 930,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 130.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2013344EN.01005702.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/57

---

Action brought on 12 August 2013 — ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas v OHIM (shape of boxes of chocolates)

(Case T-440/13)

2013/C 344/104

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zakład Wyrobów Cukierniczych ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas (Przeźmierowo, Poland) (represented by: B. Kański, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 22 May 2013 in Case R 755/2012-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 22 May 2013 in Case R 755/2012-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of boxes of chocolates for goods in Class 30 — application no 10 359 602

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: application for registration refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: breach of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37048-37049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2010-0307; FRL-9323-8]

Louisiana; Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Louisiana has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Louisiana. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior 
to the immediate final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for

[[Page 37049]]

comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by July 25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Louisiana during normal business 
hours at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-6444; or Louisiana 
Department of Environmental Quality, 602 N. Fifth Street, Baton Rouge, 
Louisiana 70884-2178, phone number (225) 219-3559. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please 
follow the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the 
immediate final rule which is located in the Rules section of this 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    For additional information, please see the immediate final rule 
published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 8, 2011.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011-15881 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
:1ECEI\.'ED 

OPPT CBIC 

2012 J[~N 17 AM 10: 45 

3676 Davis Road N.W.· Dover, Ohio 44622 • (330) 343-7711 • 1-800-321-&05 • Fax: (330) 364-9626 

January 9, 2012 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Control and Toxics (OPPT) 

u.s. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 


1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 


Washington, D.C. 20460 


Attn: 40 CFR 799.5089 (Docket # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-01 12) 


Re: Notice of Intent to Test 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

This letter serves as Dover Chemical Corporation's notice of intention to test under the above TSCA 

Section 4 Test Rule covering CAS # 72162-15-3. Under this rule we are providing the following 

required information: 

I. Identification ofTest Rule 76 Fed. Reg. 204 (October 21, 201 I) 

2. 	 Name, Address, Telephone of Sponsoring Firm Dover Chemical Corporation 


3676 Davis Road N.W. 


Dover, Ohio 44622 


3. 	 Name, Address, Telephone ofIndividual Contact - Tim Nowicki 


3676 Davis Road N.W. 


Dover, Ohio 44622 


(330)-365-3610 


4. Signatory Authority for Testing Consortium Members -	 NtA 

5. Testing Requirements Tier 1 Testing 

6. Testing of Representative Substances - NtA 

Regards, 

?~ 

Tim Nowicki 

Manager Product Compliance 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

401 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

Dover Chemical Corporation 

CONTAIN2 NO CB' 

» P1TNE Y .. ·.'~S 

I.:.;~=m Chemical 

Corporation 

A Subsldlll')' of ICC Industries Inc. ZIP 446::'::: -­$ 000 44° :J::: 1\1'1 • 

3676 Davis Road N.W. • Dover, Ohio 44622 000 1:3<'i~"506JFN 1 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Control and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. E;nvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) 


1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 


Washington, D.C. 20460 


Attn: 40 CFR 799.5089 (Docket #EPA-HQ­


OPPT -2009-0112) 


I .. i.m ....\..i.B •• "".illl.1
# C_2015320EN.01002601.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht Germany) — Seusen Sume v Landkreis Stade, in the presence of: Der Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

(Case C-445/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 320/38)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.

1

---
# Stranded travelers, snowbound residents benefit from ex-military gear 

/ Published Jan. 4, 2016
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 

The day after Christmas was no day of relaxation for hundreds of people stranded when a massive snow storm shut down an interstate highway about 40 miles east of Albuquerque, New Mexico. DLA had a hand in a successful emergency response after the highway’s eastbound lanes were closed and three shelters opened in the I-40 straddling town of Moriarty in Torrance County. The helping hand came in the form of excess military equipment from large to small, from very heavy to as light as goose down. Sheriff’s Lieutenant John Stocum said what they had gotten in past years for emergencies through DLA’s Law Enforcement Support Office was used to help, and it was more than people that needed help. Based on various news reports, an estimated 300 to 500 stranded travelers sought shelter at the Lion’s Club, the Moriarty Civic Center and the Moriarty High School annex gym. But the published news reports seen online failed to mention that there were animals, too. Pets had been in vehicles, along with their humans. “Our shelters were set up for people, but not pets,” Stocum said. “Because of the animal traps/cages we obtained from [LESO], we were able to house pets right with the owners for two days.” 

Stocum said they had picked up live trap cages at the DLA Disposition Services site at Holloman Air Force Base only intending to use them for animal control. It wasn’t just the cages that were put to new use. A dump truck the department had picked up at DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs was made into a snow plow. In a telephone interview, Stocum said that was easy because the truck already had the hydraulics for a plow when they got it.

The department had also gotten a heavy tactical truck tractor earlier from Kirtland Air Force Base because they had equipment that needed pulling. It was never meant to be a snow plow, but a blade was jury rigged onto that vehicle as well. He said the two plow-equipped trucks were used outside Moriarty because people in rural areas needed help, too.**“**Having those let us get emergency help, including food, firewood, and medicine, to our rural residents,” he said. Some of the property they held the longest got used exactly as originally intended. “We had gotten some mummy [sleeping] bags through the program when we first joined up,” he said, “and people sure were glad to use those. What we got through the program really made a difference for us.” As of Dec. 30, Stocum said the shelters for the stranded people (and pets) were no longer needed and had been shut down, but some parts of I-40 remained closed.
No. 09-11081.

#### John Christopher Blakeney, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 981,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 479.

178 L. Ed. 2d 810,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 137, 178 L. Ed. 2d 84, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6081.
No. 10-7630.

#### Daniel Giannini, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 954,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 459.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Paula Tomasi

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00 276

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 03438

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

On March 26 , 2015, r elator

, Paula Tomasi , filed a petition for writ of mandamus

requesting an order requiring the trial court to rule on a motion relator filed in the trial

court. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Diego David Tomasi , respond to

the petition for writ of mandamus. It is ordered that the real party in interest file its

response on or before April 15, 2015

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually

Date: March 26, 2015