alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        19
        
        20
        
        21
        
        22
        
        23 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VIII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending  Mar. 31, 2003   (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
# C_2016068EN.01001501.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Efeteio Athinon — Greece) — Viamar — Elliniki Aftokiniton kai Genikon Epicheiriseon AE v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-402/14) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of goods - Tax provisions - Internal taxation - Customs duties of a fiscal nature - Charges having equivalent effect - Formalities connected with the crossing of frontiers - Article 30 TFEU - Article 110 TFEU - Directive 92/12/EEC - Article 3(3) - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 1(3) - Not implemented in domestic law - Direct effect - Levying of a tax on motor vehicles at the time of their import into the territory of a Member State - Tax linked to registration and potential putting into circulation of the vehicle - Refusal to refund the tax where the vehicle is not registered))

(2016/C 068/18)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Dioikitiko Efeteio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Viamar — Elliniki Aftokiniton kai Genikon Epicheiriseon AE

Applicant:

Defendant: Elliniko Dimosio

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 1(3) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC must be interpreted as fulfilling the conditions for producing direct effect allowing individuals to rely on it before a national court in a dispute between them and a Member State. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 1(3) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC must be interpreted as fulfilling the conditions for producing direct effect allowing individuals to rely on it before a national court in a dispute between them and a Member State.

| 2. | Article 30 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a practice by a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by which the registration tax collected upon import of motor vehicles originating from other Member States is not refunded when the vehicles concerned were never registered in that Member State and were re-exported to another Member State. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 30 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a practice by a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by which the registration tax collected upon import of motor vehicles originating from other Member States is not refunded when the vehicles concerned were never registered in that Member State and were re-exported to another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<NAME> R.H. DONNELLEY CORP.
<CIK>  0000030419
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          91,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,287
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,870
<PP&E>                                          53,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 415,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,519
<BONDS>                                        351,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,622
<OTHER-SE>                                   (155,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   415,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,327
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                    72,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    704
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,948
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.51


</TABLE>
# Distribution Master Sergeant selected for USASMA

/ Published Jan. 13, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36215-36216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Assessment Governing Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board; Education.

ACTION: Notice of teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 36216]]

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming teleconference of the Achievement Levels Committee of the 
National Assessment Governing Board. This notice also describes the 
functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under 
Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Date: July 22, 1998.
    Time: 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.
    Location: National Assessment Governing Board, 800 North Capitol 
Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Wilmer, Operations Officer, 
National Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20002-4233, Telephone: (202) 357-6938.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Assessment Governing Board is 
established under section 412 of the National Education Statistics Act 
of 1994 (Title IV of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994), 
(Pub. L. 103-382).
    The Board is established to formulate policy guidelines for the 
National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Board is responsible 
for selecting subject areas to be assessed, developing assessment 
objectives, identifying appropriate achievement goals for each grade 
and subject tested, and establishing standards and procedures for 
interstate and national comparisons. Under P.L. 105-78, the National 
Assessment Governing Board is also granted exclusive authority over 
developing Voluntary National Tests pursuant to contract number 
RJ97153001.
    On July 22, in open session, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., the 
Achievement Levels Committee will meet to consider the revised 
achievement levels descriptions for writing for the purpose of 
formulating a recommendation for action on this matter at the next 
quarterly meeting of the Board.
    Records are kept of all Board proceedings and are available for 
public inspection at the U.S. Department of Education, National 
Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Roy Truby,
Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17599 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
No. 10-7639.

#### Alfonzo Meeks, Petitioner v. North Carolina.

562 U.S. 1188, 131 S. Ct. 1018,

178 L. Ed. 2d 844,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 819,

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
#### Maxine J. Alleyne, Respondent, v Erwin E. Grant, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 580]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Karen Rothenberg, J.), dated May 27, 2015, and a judgment of that court (Miriam Sunshine, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated July 7, 2015. The order denied the defendant’s motion, inter alia, to direct a further accounting and remit the matter to the Referee for further proceedings. The judgment, upon, among other things, the order, inter alia, directed the defendant to execute a deed transferring his ownership interest in the subject premises to the plaintiff.

*597Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon the entry of the judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The contentions raised by the defendant on this appeal were considered by this Court on a prior appeal. Therefore, the doctrine of the law of the case precludes reconsideration of those contentions *(see Matter of Fulmer v Buxenbaum,*109 AD3d 822, 823 [2013]; *Allison v Allison,*60 AD3d 711 [2009]).

Balkin, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
# DLA joins Air Force, Army to test skills in expeditionary logistics

/ Published March 22, 2016
Amedee Army Airfield, California,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ERIE
FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000033416
<NAME> ERIE FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           683,651
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     137,918
<MORTGAGE>                                       8,284
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    1,376
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 881,069
<CASH>                                          17,955
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 612
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          84,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,020,343
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                768,795
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                134
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,473
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,615
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,410
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,020,343
<PREMIUMS>                                      44,537
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             59,476
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,960
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   4,400
<BENEFITS>                                      57,974
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      5,145
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            13,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,390
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.69
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0










</TABLE>
No. 10-6333.

#### John Burton, Petitioner v. Spokane Police Department, et al.

562 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 599,

178 L. Ed. 2d 438,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8948.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 671.
No. 10-7093.

#### Duane Parker, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

562 U.S. 1145, 131 S. Ct. 916,

178 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 513.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Same case below, 42 So. 3d 402.
No. 10-7738.

#### Daniel Martinez-Brambila, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 964,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 44.

178 L. Ed. 2d 793,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 502.
#### In the Matter of Tyshawn M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 545]

Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon fact-finding determinations that he committed acts, that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second and third degrees, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, attempted assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree, and placed him with the Administration for Children’s Services’ Close to Home program, for a period of 12 months, with a 6-month minimum, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*555The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. During the course of a brief common-law inquiry that was clearly supported by a founded suspicion of criminality, a robbery victim was brought to the scene, where he identified appellant. In any event, even if the encounter could be viewed as a detention requiring reasonable suspicion, that requirement was also satisfied, because the totality of the information possessed by the police supported an inference that appellant and his companions were members of a group that had just committed a robbery nearby *(see eg. People v Williams,*146 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2017], *lv denied*29 NY3d 954 [2017]).

Appellant did not preserve his claim that the showup was unduly suggestive, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits (see *People v Gatling,*38 AD3d 239, 240 [1st Dept 2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 865 [2007]).

Appellant’s challenge to the court’s dispositional order is moot because he has already completed his placement (see *Matter of Yuan Tung. C.,*296 AD2d 323, 323 [1st Dept 2002]). In any event, the disposition was a provident exercise of discretion.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
# C_2014071EN.01002802.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/28

---

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2014 — Hanwha SolarOne and Others v Parliament and Others

(Case T-136/13) (1)

(2014/C 71/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1156

DOMINION COAL CORPORATION,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JOHN H. FULLER,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (21-0382-BLA)

Argued: May 7, 2024 Decided: June 12, 2024

Before DIAZ, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition for review denied; orders affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Charity Ann Barger, STREET LAW FIRM, LLP, Grundy, Virginia, for 

Petitioner. Brad Anthony Austin, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & AUSTIN, Norton, Virginia, for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1156 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/12/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Dominion Coal Corporation petitions for review of two orders of the Benefits 

Review Board (the “BRB”) — (1) the BRB’s June 23, 2022 order reversing the decision 

of an administrative law judge (the “ALJ”) denying the Black Lung Benefits Act claim of 

former underground coal miner John H. Fuller, and (2) the BRB’s January 11, 2023 order 

denying Dominion’s request for reconsideration of the June 23, 2022 order. By those 

orders, the BRB ruled that Fuller is entitled to black lung benefits and that there is no cause

to remand the matter to the ALJ.

Having carefully considered the administrative record, as well as the parties’ briefs 

and oral arguments in this Court, we are satisfied that the BRB did not commit reversible 

error. Accordingly, we deny Dominion’s petition for review and affirm the orders of the 

BRB.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED;

ORDERS AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1156 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/12/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. D A 22

- 0630

JOHN BUTLER, Appellant and
Plaintiff /Counter Defendant

,

- vs

ELINOR SWANSON and DOES 1

- 20

, inclusive,

Appellee and
Defendant /Counter Plaintiff

.

ELINOR SWANSON,

Third

- Party Plaintiff,

- vs

JOSEPH FARZAM and JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM, a Professional Corporation,
Third

- Party Defendants. ORDER GRANTING

APPELLANT AND
PLAINTIFF/COUNTER

DEFENDANT JOHN

BUTLER ’S
UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLANT B RIEF

P ursuant to Appellant and Plaintiff/Counter Defendant John Butler ’s Motion

for Extension of Time to file his opening Appellant Brief, and pursuant to Mont. R.

App., P. 26(1), and noting that Appellee does not object, Appellant is granted a

thirty

- day (30) extension within which to file his Appellant brief. Appellant’s

Opening Brief shall be due January 13, 2023.

DATED this

_____ day of

_______________, 2022.

By:

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court
November 16 2022

11/16/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0630
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

SEE REFERENCE TO RESTRICTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS 
 OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS 
  

			
	 A             
	 	
            
         


 INDEPENDENT BANK GROUP, INC. 

SENIOR NON-CUMULATIVE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES A 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT             is the registered holder of
            (            ) fully paid and non-assessable shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A,
$0.01 par value, of BOH Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”), transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. The
Corporation’s SBLF Identification Number is SBLF0055. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation as of             , 201    . 

 

					
	 /s/ David R. Brooks
	 		  	 /s/ Jan Webb

	Chairman of the Board and	 		  	Secretary
	Chief Executive Officer