alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, William L. Stephens, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting

Date: November 14, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ William L. Stephens              
|William L. Stephens                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer



21
### SERVE D AUGUS T 6,201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F ROSLYN E MARI E ELDER , Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 4 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DMSNO.FAA-2010-31 5
ADMINISTRATIV E LA WJUDGE' S ORDE R DISMISSIN GPROCEEDIN G Counse l for

th e Complainan t

ha s notifie dm e tha t

th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ha s withdraw n it s complain t becaus e th e partie s hav e reache dasettlement
. I n consideratio n o f

th e foregoin g an dpursuan t t o § 13.21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f Practice , 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.215 , thi s proceedin g i s dismisse dwith prejudice
. Th e hearin g schedule dt o begi n o n Augus t 12 , 201 0 i s cancelled
. I T I S S O ORDERED
.

/ Isaa c D
. B^nki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action )

SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y EdwardA
. Lopez , Respondent' s Forme r Counse l Ventur e Corporat e Cente r 344 0 Hollywoo dBlvd
. Suit e 41 5 Hollywood , FL3302 1 TEL : 954-241-420 5 FAX : 954-241-420 6 Roslyn e Mari e Elder , Responden t 82 5 Sierr aVist aDrive , Apt
. 32 6 La s Vegas , N V 8916 9 TEL : 702-412-564 0 Yolandi aAyal aBemal , Complainant' s Counse l Safet y Enforcemen t

Branc h Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW-7E3 , YA B Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd. , Roo m66 3 For t Worth , T X 76137-000 7 TEL : 817-222-507 0 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n or

b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-«0
.
CS234967G

National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention 

Division of Tuberculosis Elimination

What You Need to Know About Your Medicine 

for Latent Tuberculosis (TB) Infection

ISONIAZID

You have been given medicine to treat your latent TB infection. You do not have 

TB disease and cannot spread TB to others. This medicine will help you PREVENT

getting TB disease.

While on this Medicine:

• Tell your doctor or nurse if you have questions or concerns with the medicine.

• Go to your planned clinic visits.

• Discuss any alcohol use with your doctor. Alcohol use may cause side effects.

• Tell your doctor about all other medicines you are taking.

• Be sure to tell your other doctors that you are being treated for latent 

TB infection.

• Take all of your medicine as you were told by your TB doctor or nurse.

• Some people find that the medicine affects them less when taken with food.

Tips to Help You Take Your Medicine:

9 Take your medicine at the same time every day.

9 Set an alarm reminder for the time you should take your medicine.

9 Ask a family member or friend to remind you. 

9 Use a pillbox. 

9 Put a reminder note on your mirror or refrigerator.

9 Use a calendar to check off the day when you take your medicine.

Latent TB Infection Medicine Schedule:

(Providers: Indicate the appropriate schedule, days and number of pills)

Medicine Schedule Days

Number 

of pills

per day

Length

of time

Isoniazid

 Daily Every day

9 months

 Twice Weekly* M T W Th F S Sun

Your doctor may have you take vitamin B6 with your medicine.

Note: When isoniazid is to be taken 2 times a week, it should be given by directly 

observed therapy (DOT).*

IF YOU FORGET TO TAKE YOUR MEDICINE: If it is still the same day, take the 

dose as soon as you remember. If the day has passed, skip the missed dose 

and take your next scheduled dose — do not take 2 doses at the same time.

NOTES

Name of my doctor:

Name of my clinic:

Telephone number of my clinic:

Watch for these Possible 

Problems: 

STOP taking your medicine right 

away AND call your TB doctor 

or nurse if you have any of the 

problems below:

• Less appetite, or no appetite for 

food

• An upset stomach or stomach 

cramps

• Nausea or vomiting

• Cola-colored urine or light 

stools

• Rash or itching

• Yellowing skin or eyes

• Tingling or numbness in your 

hands or feet

*Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)

You will meet with a health care 

worker to take your medicine. This 

plan is called directly observed 

therapy. 

DOT can help you in several ways. 

• The health care worker helps 

you to remember to take your 

medicine. 

• You will complete your 

treatment as soon as possible. 

• The health care worker will 

make sure you are not having 

problems with the medicine.
No. 10-6542.

#### Connie Marshall, Petitioner v. Vic Staffieri, et al.

562 U.S. 1033, 131 S. Ct. 575,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8731.

178 L. Ed. 2d 420,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 04, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 04, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0337. KARYN ROBINSON v. OPEN HOUSE ATLANTA REALTY & 

INVESTMENTS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2023CV390481
# DLA Land and Maritime Sailor heads to Officer Candidate School

/ Published Dec. 7, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime celebrated Logistics Specialist 1st Class Chelsea Spicer on her recent acceptance to Navy Officer Candidate School Nov. 29.

Spicer is a lead expeditor assigned to DLA Maritime – Pearl Harbor at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, where she is responsible for leading a team of Sailors in expediting the procurement of high priority material requirements in support of maintenance operations at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard.

The Sequin, Texas, native enlisted in the Navy in August of 2016. Utilizing Navy Tuition Assistance to fund most of her degree requirements, she earned a Bachelor of Arts in Public Administration in 2022 from Hawaii Pacific University.

She will report to OCS at Naval Station Newport in Rhode Island in January to complete the 13-week course for commission as a supply corps officer.
18 years in the military 

and my biggest battle

was against cigarettes.

Brian, age 60 

Air Force Veteran

Texas

Brian smoked and got heart disease. He went 

from serving his country overseas to spending 

his life in emergency rooms and operating 

rooms. Finally, he quit smoking and, years later, 

got a heart transplant that saved his life.

You can quit smoking. 

For free help, call

1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
# C_2016145EN.01000501.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain)) — Finanmadrid EFC SA v Jesús Vicente Albán Zambrano, María Josefa García Zapata, Jorge Luis Albán Zambrano and Miriam Elisabeth Caicedo Merino

(Case C-49/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms - Order for payment procedure - Enforcement proceedings - Powers of the national court responsible for enforcement to raise of its own motion the fact that the unfair term is invalid - Principle of res judicata - Principle of effectiveness - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Judicial protection))

(2016/C 145/04)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanmadrid EFC SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Jesús Vicente Albán Zambrano, María Josefa García Zapata, Jorge Luis Albán Zambrano and Miriam Elisabeth Caicedo Merino

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not permit the court ruling on the enforcement of an order for payment to assess of its own motion whether a term in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer is unfair, when the authority hearing the application for an order for payment does not have the power to make such an assessment.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
Exhibit
      32.1


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Marsh, Chief
      Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
      15, 2005











/s/
      Thomas B. Marsh


Chief
      Executive Officer, President
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: January 16, 2017By:/s/ Robert W. MonsterRobert W. MonsterChief Executive Officer Principal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Swaby, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 606]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered November 29, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion based on the People’s summation. The challenged remarks generally constituted fair comment on the evidence and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, made in response to defense arguments, and the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see *People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). To the extent that any portions of the summation could be viewed as improper, the court’s curative actions sufficed to prevent any prejudice (see *People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865 [1981]).

The court properly ruled that defendant opened the door to uncharged crimes evidence that the court had previously precluded (see *People v Melendez,*55 NY2d 445, 451-452 [1982]). Moreover, this evidence was not unduly prejudicial.

*105We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
# C_2013215EN.01001601.xml

| 27.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/16

---

Action brought on 29 May 2013 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland/OHIM — Belron Hungary (United Autoglas)

(Case T-297/13)

2013/C 215/22

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Junited Autoglas Deutschland (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Belron Hungary Kft — Zug Branch (Zug, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Dismiss the opposition filed by the intervener to the application for registration of the Community trademark ‘United Autoglas’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Dismiss the opposition filed by the intervener to the application for registration of the Community trademark ‘United Autoglas’;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the board of Appeal;

| — | Order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘United Autoglas’ for goods and services in classes 1, 12 and 37 — Community trade mark registration No 6 025 498

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: United Kingdom and Polish trade mark registrations of figurative marks containing the word element ‘AUTOGLASS’ and the word marks ‘AUTOGLASS’ for goods and services in classes 12, 21 et 37

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7239.

#### Jose Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Jeff Woods, Warden.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 928,

178 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 540.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 2-69243) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan
and the EDO Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-01526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive
Plan and the EDO Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1983 Long-term
Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO
Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77865) pertaining to
the EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO Corporation 1997
Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-88620 relating to
the issuance by EDO Corporation of its 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due
2007, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-105265) pertaining to the
EDO Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO
Corporation 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, of our reports dated February 11,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EDO
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
December 5, 2003
# C_2018301EN.01002301.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Rogesa v Commission

(Case T-643/13) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Request for access to information relating to the determination of the most efficient 10 % of the steel industry installations - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Overriding public interest - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Concept of information relating to emissions into the environment - Observance of time-limits))

(2018/C 301/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and P.-A. Schütter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and B. Martenczuk initially, then F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, seeking the annulment of the Commission decision dated 25 September 2013 refusing to grant the applicant access to documents which contain information on the basis of assessment used by the Commission to determine the most efficient 10 % of the installations used as a starting point for defining the principles for setting ex ante benchmarks, in accordance with Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

---
Kenneth Scherado Jr.

DART830579WP

2830 N Rancho Dr

Suite A

Las Vegas, Nv. 89130

702-645-9821

FAX: 702-645-1740

Kennylma01@embarqmail.com

01/11//2012

Ref. ID # FAA-2011-1360-0001

Aircraft: N15YR

Model: Jetwing

S/N: 003

Reg. Owner John D. Parker

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Petition for Exemption to 14 CFR 91.151(a)(1) 30 Minute Fuel Reserve For Day 

VFR

In support of and at your request I have added the “N” number, make and model of the 

aircraft this request is for as listed above.

The request is for this aircraft only and will be piloted by only one person. The designer 

and manufacturer, Mr. Yves Rossy will be the sole pilot for all operations. Mr. Rossy

holds a Swiss and US pilots license as well as a Swiss and US Para License. The 

following is a breakdown of Mr. Rossy pilot experience.

TOTAL JUMPS (SKY DIVE AND FLIGHTS) 1698

TOTAL FLIGHTS WING ON BACK 641 

TOTAL FLIGHTS WITH JETWING (MOTORIZED) 254

TOTAL FLIGHTS WITH JETWING (GLIDEING) 387

TOTAL FLIGHT HOURS MOTORIZED 33.9 HRS.

TOTAL FLIGHT TIME GLIDING 16.1 HRS.

Mr. Rossy has a very high level of expertise in launching, flying and landing the Jetwing

both in motorized and gliding conditions. The level of safety that will occur with only

him being the pilot will exceed all requirements. Also, I have attached the original 

Certificate of Waiver that was issued to Mr. Yves Rossy as Pilot in Command when they

were issued the Experimental Certificate for Exhibition in May 2011. Mr. Rossy flew the 

Jetwing over the Grand Canyon during this Exhibition flight.

Kenneth Scherado

DART83579WP