alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Joint Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittees on Plant Operations and on Fire Protection; Notice 
of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittees on Plant Operations and on Fire Protection 
will hold a joint meeting on July 29, 1998, at the NRC Region II 
Office, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Suite 23 T85, 
Atlanta, Georgia.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, July 29, 1998--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of 
business
    The Subcommittees will meet with the NRC Region II personnel to 
discuss Region II activities and other items of mutual interest, 
including significant operating events, on-line maintenance, plant 
performance review program, results of the pilot fire protection 
functional inspection, and other fire protection issues. The purpose of 
this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittees, their consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make 
oral statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named 
below five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittees, along 
with any of their consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittees will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of Region II personnel and other 
interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor, can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Amarjit Singh (telephone 301/415-6899) between 7:30 
a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are 
urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: July 1, 1998.
Medhat M. El-Zeftawy,
Acting Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-18040 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (i)   | the                Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q                for                the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii)   | information                contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects                the                financial condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges                Holding Corp. |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 15, 2006 |   |   |   | /s/ Joseph                Looney        |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |   |   | Joseph                LooneyChief Financial                Officer         |

----
# C_2013298EN.01000602.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/6

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT)

(Case T-37/13) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 298/09

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: A. von Bismarck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Exakt Precision Tools Ltd (Aberdeen, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2012 (Case R 1764/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH and Exakt Precision Tools Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
No. 10-7114.

#### Mustafa Redzic, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1059, 131 S. Ct. 686,

178 L. Ed. 2d 475,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9217.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma paup-eris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Same case below, 569 F.3d 841.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        69
        
        70
        
        71
        
        72
        
        73 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. D-2475.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Howard L. Blau.

562 U.S. 999, 131 S. Ct. 555,

178 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8446.

November 1, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 40, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1130, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5620.
#### *In re Marriage of Ashagari,*

No. 91810-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71295-1-1, March 23, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1033. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
#### People v Caballero

2d Dept: 137 AD3d 929 (Queens)

denied 8/2/16 (Fahey, J.)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVEN TOGNOLI, as Personal Representative for the Estate of LYNDA 

TOGNOLI,

Appellant,

v.

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-224

[April 25, 2018]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John J. Murphy III, Judge; L.T. Case 

Nos. 08-80000 (19) and 2008-CV-045898 (19).

Thomas J. Seider, Celene H. Humphries and Maegen Peek Luka of 

Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; Alex Alvarez of The Alvarez Law Firm, 

Coral Gables; Randy Rosenblum of Dolan, Dobrinsky, Rosenblum, LLP, 

Miami; Philip Freidin of Freidin Brown P.A., Miami; and Maria P. 

Sperando of the Law Office of Maria P. Sperando, P.A., Stuart, for 

appellant.

Scott D. Kaiser of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, Missouri; 

and Geoffrey J. Michael of Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC, for 

appellee.

ON REMAND FROM 

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of 

Florida. In a decision rendered June 28, 2017, we per curiam affirmed 

the trial court’s final judgment, which reduced the plaintiff’s damages by 

the percentage of fault that the jury attributed to Mrs. Tognoli, based on 

our then-binding precedent in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schoeff, 178 

So. 3d 487, 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). The Florida Supreme Court then 

quashed our Schoeff decision and held that “the comparative fault 

statute does not apply to Engle progeny cases in which the jury finds for 
2

the plaintiff on the intentional tort claims.” Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds 

Tobacco Co., 232 So. 3d 294, 304 (Fla. 2017). Consequently, our 

decision in the instant case was also quashed.

The parties do not assert issues with the jury’s findings of intentional 

torts and have agreed on the remedy that we likewise deem proper. 

Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand with instructions 

for the trial court to enter judgment for the entire amount of damages 

found by the jury.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
DRS Technologies, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-14487, 333-119977, 333-83700 and 333-136909)
on Form S-8, in the registration statement (No. 333-130926) on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-129948)
on Form S-4 of DRS Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated May 30, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DRS Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008,
which reports appear in the March 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of DRS Technologies, Inc.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company's adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109," effective April 1, 2007, the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, "Share-Based
Payment," effective April 1, 2006, and the adoption of SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an Amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R," effective at the end of fiscal 2007.

Our
report also refers to the restatement of the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2007.

Our
report dated May 30, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008, expresses our opinion that the Company did not
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that a material weakness existed in the accounting for subsequent events.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Short
Hills, New Jersey
May 30, 2008

---



QuickLinks
# C_2015138EN.01004901.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/49

---

Order of the General Court of 3 March 2015 — Gemeente Nijmegen v Commission

(Case T-251/13) (1)

1

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by a Netherlands municipality in favour of a professional football club - Decision to open the formal examination procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU - Aid measure completely implemented on the date of the decision - Admissibility - Challengeable act))

(2015/C 138/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gemeente Nijmegen (Netherlands) (represented by: H. Janssen and S. van der Heul, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1152 final of 6 March 2013 concerning the aid granted to Netherlands professional football clubs Vitesse, NEC, Willem II, MVV, PSV and FC Den Bosch between 2008 and 2011 (State aid SA.33584 (2013/C) (ex 2011/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2) | Gemeente Nijmegen is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Gemeente Nijmegen is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.01 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.01 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.01 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.01 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2763 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 

implementing certain rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas (for herself, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. ESCOBAR, and Mr. CORREA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development from implementing certain rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION. 

4 The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

5 may not implement, administer, enforce, or in any manner 

6 make effective the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Housing and 

7 Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eli8 gible Status’’, issued by the Department of Housing and 

9 Urban Development on May 10, 2019 (Docket No. FR– 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2763 IH

1 6124–P–01), or any final rule based substantially on such 

2 proposed rule. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2013207EN.01003602.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/36

---

Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)

(Case T-213/13)

2013/C 207/60

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (Serres-Castet, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 775/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 775/2012-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Square, Inc.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The international registration designating the European Union of the word mark SQUARE for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 38 — international trade mark designating the European Union No W 1 032 395

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark SQUARE-énergie for goods and services in Classes 31, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 44

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# Former POW shares story of capture, liberation during remembrance ceremony

/ Published Sept. 24, 2015
PHILADELPHIA,
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
William C. Bopp, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Viking Systems, Inc.







Date:   December 3 , 2009
            /s/ William C.
      BoppWilliam
      C. BoppChief
      Executive Officer