alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013171EN.01003703.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/37

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — SCA Hygiène Products v Commission

(Case T-232/13)

2013/C 171/72

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SCA Hygiène Products (Tremblay en France, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission

---
No. 10-7198.

#### Kevin J. Morse, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 834,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9692.

178 L. Ed. 2d 567,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 787.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.49 MB)

Tags:historypage_director

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-855-DR]


Territory of American Samoa; Amendment to Notice of a Major 
Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Territory of American Samoa (FEMA-855-DR), dated February 9, 1990, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the cost-sharing 
arrangements under FEMA-855-DR is adjusted at 90 percent Federal 
funding for eligible costs for the Public Assistance Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

    Dated: June 17, 1998.
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-17248 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# Turkish Land Forces Command visits DLA Distribution

/ Published Nov. 20, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

Members of the Turkish Land Forces Command visited the largest distribution center in the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution network, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., on Nov. 19 to discuss DLA’s global logistics processes and how DLA Distribution supports foreign military sales customers.  The visit included Maj. Gen. Mehmet Özoğlu, head of the Logistics Directorate in the Turkish Land Forces Command.

The group began the visit with a tour of the Eastern Distribution Center, the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse.  Army Lt. Col. Jacob Freeman, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, led the group through the organization’s key locations, including receiving operations, the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area.

After touring the Eastern Distribution Center, the group finished their visit to the installation by meeting with United States Army Security Assistance Command representatives.

Özoğlu is responsible for macro-level planning and execution of all logistical activities of the Turkish Land Forces.  The visit was part of DLA Distribution’s ongoing efforts to partner with warfighting customers to provide efficient, effective, and best value support.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-086]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: July 6, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of the Patent Counsel, Langley 
Research Center, Mail Stop 212, Hampton, VA 23681-0001; telephone (757) 
864-9260.
    NASA Case No. LAR 15564-1-SB: Method of Controlling Laser 
Wavelength(s);
    NASA Case No. LAR 15562-1: Method and Apparatus to Assess Optimum 
Strength During Processing of Precipitation Strengthened Alloys;
    NASA Case No. LAR 15666-1: An Airplane Design Concept Having an In 
Board-Wing Bounded by Fuselages Mounted at Each Wing Tip;
    NASA Case No. LAR 15745-1: Prepreg and Composites Made from 
Polyimide ``Salt-Lake'' Solution;
    NASA Case No. LAR 15040-2: Method and Apparatus for Histological 
Human Tissue Characterization Using Ultrasound;
    NASA Case No. LAR 15534-3: Method of Preparing Polymers With Low 
Melt Viscosity (DIV. of-1).

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-17733 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2179

 To amend the Revenue Act of 1987 to provide a permanent extension of 
     the transition rule for certain publicly traded partnerships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 14 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

 Mr. Packwood (for himself, Mr. Baucus, and Mr. Hatch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Revenue Act of 1987 to provide a permanent extension of 
     the transition rule for certain publicly traded partnerships.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TRANSITION RULE FOR CERTAIN PUBLICLY 
              TRADED PARTNERSHIPS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 10211(c) of the Revenue 
Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-203) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1987, 
        except that such amendments shall not apply to any existing 
        partnership.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the provisions of section 10211 of the Revenue 
Act of 1987.

                                 <all>
```
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
						Search

		Submit





Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Trichomoniasis Archive																									Related Pages
												The listed web pages are archived for historical purposes and are no longer being updated.*Trichomonas vaginalis*, HIV, and African-Americans – EID (November-December 2001)

			
							
								Page last reviewed:  November 27, 2018						Content source:  	Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Trichomoniasis
Facts & Brochures
Fact Sheet
Statistics
Treatment and Care
Archive Other STD Topics
 STDs Home Page
Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Genital Herpes
Hepatitis
HIV/AIDS & STDs
Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
*Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen)*
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)
STDs & Infertility
STDs during Pregnancy
Syphilis
Trichomoniasis
Other STDs
 See Also Pregnancy
HIV / AIDS
 Follow STD STD on Twitter
STD on Facebook


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
#### Vicki Morwitz et al., Appellants, v Mobili De Angelis et al., Defendants, and Central Plumbing Specialties Co., Inc., Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 667]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered September 28, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the breach of contract and General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 causes of action against defendant Central Plumbing Specialties Co., Inc. (Central), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since a fair interpretation of the evidence supports the determination of the fact finding court, based largely on its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses, that plaintiffs’ claims under General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 are without merit, we are obliged to defer to it *(see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). The claims for breach of contract, based on the allegation that defendants promised to deliver an “Italian” cabinet, was correctly dismissed as barred by the parol evidence rule, inasmuch as the parties’ integrated and detailed written agreement did not specify that the cabinet was required to be “Italian” *(see Matter of Primex Intl. Corp. v Wal-Mart Stores,*89 NY2d 594, 600 [1997]; *Braten v Bankers*
      *515
      *Trust Co.,*60 NY2d 155, 162 [1983]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
No. 09-9487.

#### Anthony Grant Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1128, 131 S. Ct. 896,

178 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 126.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133, 130 S. Ct. 1265, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2010).

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 297.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

John Patrick Keeney, New York City, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1731 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to November 8, 2019, and upon reading the December 23, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Ettelson], 161 AD3d 1478, 1479-1480 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Clark, J.P., Mulvey, Devine, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.
No. D-2512.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Nikita V. Mackey

562 U.S. 810, 131 S. Ct. 400,

178 L. Ed. 2d 265,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7581.

October 4, 2010.

Nikita V. Mackey, of Charlotte, North Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 4.1
                                                                     -----------

                      FORM OF CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
                      ------------------------------------

Houston, Texas

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ATSI, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (Maker), promises to pay to
RECAP MARKETING & CONSULTING LLP (Holder) the principal sum of [amount] with
--------------------------------
interest from date at the rate of twelve percent (12%), per year, until applied
to warrants converted under a separate agreement. Holder or Maker has the right
to convert the Principal at the price per share (rate) identified in Exhibit 4.1
of the Consulting Agreement ("Conversion"). Such Conversion shall occur only
after approval of a reverse split, and authorization by the SEC of the Maker,
and approval by the Board of Directors, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld.

Principal is payable in lawful money, or stock if converted, of the United
States of America at 12000 Westheimer, Suite 340, Houston, Texas 77077, or at
such place as may later be designated by written notice from the Holder to the
Maker hereof, on the date and in the manner following:

All  principal  and accrued interest is due on or before twelve (12) months from
the  date  the  principal  amount  is  received.

This  Note is not secured, other than by conversion of warrants to common stock.

Both parties understand that the amount or value above does not exceed the
maximum interest allowed by law, under the statutes of the state of Texas, and
acknowledge that the terms are reasonable given the nature of the loan.

                              ATSI, Inc.
                              a Nevada Corporation
                              By:      /s/  Arthur L. Smith
                                       --------------------
                              Arthur L. Smith
                              Its President and Chief Executive Officer

Amount:  $25,000     Received  on:  AUGUST  23,  2004
         -------                    -----------------
Amount:  $25,000     Received  on:  AUGUST  30,  2004
         -------                    -----------------
Amount:  $25,000     Received  on:  SEPTEMBER  15,  2004
         -------                    --------------------
Amount:  $150,000    Received  on:  SEPTEMBER  20,  2004
         --------                   --------------------
Amount:  $25,000     Received  on:  OCTOBER  08,  2004
         -------                    ------------------
Amount:  $25,000     Received  on:  OCTOBER  12,  2004
         -------                    ------------------
Amount:  $10,000     Received  on:  OCTOBER  15,  2004
         -------                    ------------------
Amount:  $15,000     Received  on:  OCTOBER  25,  2004
         -------                    ------------------


<PAGE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 24, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00573

- CV

IN RE Brandon TORRES and Ernesto Rivera, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 15, 2018, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining the trial court had not ruled upon their “Motion to Dismiss.” The real parties in interest filed a response, to which relators replied. We reviewed the petition, the response, and the reply, and we conclude relators are entitled to the relief requested. Acc ordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is

CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable Michael V. Garcia is ORDERED to rule on relators’ “Motion to Dismiss” within fifteen days from the date of this order. The writ will issue only if we are notified that Judge Garcia has not complied within fifteen days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 24, 2018

.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of October, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17

- 05

- 57235

- CV, styled Alissa Garcia and Jose Reynaldo Mendez Garcia v. Brandon Torres, Ernesto Rivera, Jr., and Coalition Against Insurance Fraud , pending in the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia presiding.
MARCH 24

WORLD TB DAY
# C_2015414EN.01002701.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Trekstor v OHIM (SmartTV Station)

(Case T-649/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark SmartTV Station - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 414/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: O. Spieker and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially M. Fischer, then G. Schneider and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2013 (Case R 128/2013-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign SmartTV Station as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders TrekStor Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders TrekStor Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---