alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015414EN.01000302.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Sveda’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

(Case C-126/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 168 - Right of deduction - Deduction of input VAT on the acquisition or production of capital goods - Recreational path directly intended for use by the public free of charge - Use of the recreational path as a means of carrying out taxed transactions))

(2015/C 414/04)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Sveda’ UAB

Applicant:

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Defendant:

Third party: Klaipėdos apskrities valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija

Third party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 168 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as granting, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, a taxable person the right to deduct the input value added tax paid for the acquisition or production of capital goods, for the purposes of a planned economic activity related to rural and recreational tourism, which are (i) directly intended for use by the public free of charge, and may (ii) enable taxed transactions to be carried out, provided that a direct and immediate link is established between the expenses associated with the input transactions and an output transaction or transactions giving rise to the right to deduct or with the taxable person’s economic activity as a whole, which is a matter for the referring court to determine on the basis of objective evidence.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following are subsidiaries of the Company, the respective jurisdictions of
their incorporation and names (if any) under which they do business.  The
Company owns all of the voting securities (including directors' qualifying
shares owned beneficially by the Company) of each such subsidiary except the
Company owns only approximately 50% of EDO (Canada) Limited.

The names of particular subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted.  When
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, these omitted subsidiaries
do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as such term is defined in Rule
1-02(v) of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                         Jurisdiction        Name Under Which
                                              of                Subsidiary
     Name                                Incorporation       Does Business

EDO Western Corporation                  Utah            EDO Electro-Ceramics
Barnes Engineering Company               Delaware        EDO Barnes
EDO (Canada) Limited                     Canada
EDO Operations (Israel) Ltd.             Israel
EDO Foreign Sales Corporation            U.S. Virgin Islands
EDO Sports, Inc.                         Delaware
EDO Western International Corporation    Delaware
EDO International Corporation            Delaware
VT Technologies, Inc.                    Delaware
EDO Energy Corporation                   Delaware
EDO Automotive Natural Gas, Inc.         Delaware
Specialty Plastics, Inc.                 Louisiana       EDO Specialty Plastics
EDO Acquisition II, Inc,                 Delaware        EDO Technology Services
                                                           and Analysis
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Three-Five Systems, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Jurgens, Interim Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (3)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(4)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ James E. JurgensJames E. JurgensInterim Chief Financial OfficerDate: April 19, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0057]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Deposit Bond Individual-Sale 
of Government Personal Property

AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding reinstatement 
to a previously approved OMB clearance (3090-0057).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Deposit Bond Individual-Sale of Government 
Personal Property.

DATES: Comment Due Date: March 27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Dingle, Federal Supply Service 
(703) 305-6190.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
reinstate information collection, 3090-0057 concerning Deposit Bond 
Individual-Sale of Government Personal Property. This form is used by a 
bidder participating in sales of Government personal property whenever 
the sales invitation permits an individual type of deposit bond in lieu 
of cash or other form of bid deposit.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 500; annual responses: 1; average hours per response: 
.25; burden hours: 125.
    Copy of Proposal: A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the 
GSA Acquisition Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20405 or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by 
faxing your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-1772 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
  (1)
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2006, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(3)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report..
   
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61187 Summary Calendar

ABDUL KARIM, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No. A79 011 669)

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner Abdul Karim, a native and citizen of Pakistan, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals ‘(BIA) denial of his motion for reconsideration of his removal proceedings. Karim argues that the BIA erred when it denied his motion for reconsideration, in which he sought an adjustment of status based on a pending visa petition for alien worker status. We apply an abuse of discretion standard when we review motions to reconsider immigration proceedings. Singh v. Gonzales , 436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir. 2006). The BIA did not abuse its2

discretion in denying Karim’s motion for reconsideration, as the record reflects that Karim had not supplied the BIA with the requisite documentation to obtain an adjustment of status. See United States v. Ryan-Webster , 363 F.3d 353, 355 (4th Cir. 2003); 8 U.S.C. §§ 1153(b), 1255(a). Karim contends that his due process rights were violated because the BIA rejected his eligibility for an adjustment of status. We review due process challenges arising from deportation proceedings de novo . Anwar v. INS , 116 F.3d 140, 144 (5th Cir. 1997). Given Karim’s failure to comply with the statutory prerequisites for obtaining adjustment of status on his alien worker petition, he cannot show that his constitutional rights were violated by the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider his removal proceedings. See Assaad v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 471, 475 (5th Cir. 2004). Karim has filed a motion to remand his petition to the BIA for reconsideration based on the approval of his I-140 petition. Although Karim has also attached an I-485 form, he fails to provide any evidence that the form has been approved. The BIA was not privy to these documents, and, moreover, Karim still has not satisfied the final requisite steps for obtaining adjustment of status. See Ryan-Webster , 353 F.3d at 355-56. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; MOTION FOR REMAND DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         190,027   
<SECURITIES>                                   920,000   
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0         
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0         
<INVENTORY>                                    0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,696,263 
<PP&E>                                         0         
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,696,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,188  
<BONDS>                                        0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0        
<PREFERRED>                                    0        
<COMMON>                                       608,293  
<OTHER-SE>                                     876,782  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,696,263
<SALES>                                        0        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               456,214  
<CGS>                                          0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,893  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                262,321  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   109,000  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0        
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0        
<CHANGES>                                      0        
<NET-INCOME>                                   153,321  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
ISO Srq~s 

' c 

r 

~~yr'9C PROSEG~`O 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C . 20460 

o 2, 2010 

J. Capozzelli 

315 West 90t' Street 

New York, NY 10024 

Dear Ms . Capozzelli : 

OFFICE OF 

RESOURCE CONSERVATION 

AND RECOVERY 

Thank you for your letter of July 20, 2010, to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, regarding the Agency's proposed rule to identify nonhazardous secondary materials that are solid waste when burned in combustion units. In your 

letter, you expressed concern that the proposed rule would allow certain facilities to burn scrap 

plastics, used chemicals, and other industrial wastes without emissions controls, air monitoring, 

or reporting requirements . 

EPA is accepting comments on the proposed rule through August 3, 2010 and will 

promulgate a final rule based on the entirety of the comments provided and all information and 

data available to it . I appreciate your concerns and will ensure that your letter is entered into the 

rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329) for consideration as the final rule is developed. 

Again, thank you for your letter . If you have further questions, please contact George 

Faison of my staff at (703) 305-7652 or via email at faison .george kepa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Suzanne Rudzinski, Acting Director 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2884 

To improve the provision of health care by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To improve the provision of health care by the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran’s Choice Ac5 countability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EVALUATION OF FEE-BASIS CARE PROVIDED BY DE7 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate all 

9 programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs under 

10 which the Secretary furnishes hospital care, medical servVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:04 Jun 05, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2884.IH H2884

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2884 IH

1 ices, and nursing home care to determine the most inten2 sively used specialized care programs of the Department 

3 and to ensure such programs are maintained as centers 

4 of excellence. 

5 SEC. 3. EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF VA BUDGET 

6 AND CHOICE IMPROVEMENT ACT. 

7 Not later than two years after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

9 submit to Congress an evaluation of the implementation 

10 by the Secretary of the VA Budget and Choice Improve11 ment Act (title IV of Public Law 114–41). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
LIVING QUARTERS ALLOWANCE COMPUTATION WORKSHEET 

ANNUAL REVIEW

PART I 

This form is provided to all U. S. Civilian Employees receiving Living Quarters Allowance for use in recording all 

housing costs. In DOD Standardized Regulations, it is suggested this form be completed as follows: 

1. Fill out on a monthly basis 

2. Must be submitted on any of the following occasions: (a) Initial Reconciliation; (b) 12-month anniversary following a 

change of quarters; or (c) At request of employee or management 

PART II - To be completed by employee: 

Name: _________________________________ Grade: ________ Activity: ___________________ 

SSN: __________________________________ No. of Dependents at Post: _______ 

Move-in Date: ____________ Move-out Date: ___________ (as applicable) 

Phone: _________________ Fax: _________________ EMail: __________________________ 

Monthly Expenditures for Allowable Expenses 

(Express in currency the expense was paid i.e., Euro or Dollars)

Rent Electric Heat Water Garage Gas Other* 

Month/Yr (gasolio) (Not bottled) (bombola) 

JAN __ 

FEB __ 

MAR __ 

APR __ 

MAY __ 

JUN __ 

JUL __ 

AUG __ 

SEP __ 

OCT __ 

NOV __ 

DEC __ 

TOTAL 

If PCSing provide forwarding address: _____________________________________________________ 

_____________________________________________________ 

and new office phone & fax (DSN & Comm) _____________________________________________________ 

* Expenses should be numbered and explained on a separate sheet of paper.

Falsification or misrepresentation of an item in a claim may result in forfeiture of the entire claim as provided in 28 U.S.C. 

2514, as well as removal from employment in the federal service. 

EMPLOYEE STATEMENT

I certify that the information given on the application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

__________________________________________ ___________________ 

Signature Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,918<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (128)
<INVENTORY>                                     58,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                       (80,076)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,060
<SALES>                                         12,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,202
<CGS>                                            8,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (94)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                       582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<FN>
<F1>Balance includes $2,467 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 154 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2763 

[Report No. 116–196] 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 

implementing certain rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas (for herself, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. ESCOBAR, and Mr. CORREA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Ms. PRESSLEY, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 

and Mr. DESAULNIER

SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 15, 2019] 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2763 RH

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development from implementing certain rules. 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2763 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Families To5 gether Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

8 may not implement, administer, enforce, or in any manner 

9 make effective the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Housing and 

10 Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligi11 ble Status’’, issued by the Department of Housing and 

12 Urban Development on May 10, 2019 (Docket No. FR– 

13 6124–P–01), or any final rule based substantially on such 

14 proposed rule. 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 154 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2763 

[Report No. 116–196] 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development from implementing certain rules. 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
No. 10-630.

#### International Boundary Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Shirley-Ann Leu, et vir.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1006,

178 L. Ed. 2d 828,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 858.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 693.
### Exhibit 32.1

### 

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Michael Wilson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ J. Michael Wilson               
|------------------------------------
|J. Michael Wilson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2005