alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.A****CERTIFICATION**I, James J. Cleary, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of El Paso Natural Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:February 28, 2007         */s/ James J. Cleary*   James J. Cleary   President(Principal Executive Officer)El Paso Natural Gas Company
# C_2016068EN.01000601.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 December 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-180/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Daily rest - Weekly rest - Maximum weekly working time))

(2016/C 068/07)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: A. Samoni-Rantou, N. Dafniou and S. Vodina, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to implement an average weekly working time of not more than 48 hours and by failing to ensure a minimum daily rest period or an equivalent period of compensatory rest which directly follows the working time which that period is supposed to compensate for, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 6 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to implement an average weekly working time of not more than 48 hours and by failing to ensure a minimum daily rest period or an equivalent period of compensatory rest which directly follows the working time which that period is supposed to compensate for, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 6 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-41344, 333-44272, 333-60648, 333-65136, 333-73770, 333-76720,
333-82634 and 333-83094), on Form S-4 (No. 333-82628), and on Form S-8 (Nos.
33-31662, 33-56384, 33-56386, 33-65790, 33-64349, 333-13531, 333-36598,
333-44345, 333-48320, 333-48322, 333-53633, 333-81678, and 333-81676) of
Weatherford International, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Weatherford
International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.


                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Houston, Texas
March 22, 2002
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Moerman, Vice President & Controller of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and****

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and****

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Airlines For America Mr. Bob Ireland 

(A4A) ~t'ZJ{It~ '5t4fi 01-::: ~~ 

Other/Additional Information:
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3934

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Barry Mitchell Page, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 17, 2007 Filed: July 27, 2007

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found Barry Mitchell Page guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court 1 sentenced him to 180 months in prison, the statutory minimum under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and five years of supervised releas e. Page appeals, raising six arguments. After carefully reviewing the record and his submissions on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court.-2- First, we conclude that the defense of entr apment did not require Page to be acquitted and that the defense of outrage ous government conduct did not require the charges to be dismissed. SeeUnited States v. Cannon , 88 F.3d 1495, 1506 (8th Cir. 1996). Second, we conclude that the special -verdict form submitted to the jury did not affect Page’s sentence. See18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e)(1 ). Third, we conclude that he has not met his bur den to show that the govern ment knowingly put on false evidence or perjured testimony at trial. See United States v. Funchess , 422 F.3d 698, 701 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1452 (2006). Fourth, we conclude that Page also has not met his burden to show that the government suppressed material evidence favorable to his defense. SeeUnited States v. Cazares , 465 F.3d 327, 333 (8th Cir. 2006), petition for cert. filed , __ U.S.L.W. __ (U.S . Mar. 12, 2007) (No. 06-10088). Fifth, we conclude that the record as a whole shows that he was sufficiently aware of the dangers and disa dvantages of self-representation when the district court granted his motion to pr oceed pro se with standby counsel. See United States v. Crawford , Nos. 06-3464/3465/3466, 2007 WL 1610468, at *3 (8th Cir. June 6, 2007). Sixth, we conclude that Page’s sentence is not cruel and unusual. See United States v. Yirkovsky , 259 F.3d 704, 705-07 (8th Cir. 2001). For these reasons, we affirm the judgmen t of the district court. Finally, we deny Page’s pending motion for “mandatory judicial notice.”

______________________________
[4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2010-0275; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-231~AD; Amendment (0.-

## 7

- I[) 

## 1&344 OUTING SYMOOI. 39-**; AD 

## **1~O/O-I4--CI -( RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B. 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-40 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This AD requires reworking orreplacing certain duct assemblies inthe environmental control system (ECS). This AD results fro reports ofduct assemblies inthe ECS with burned Boeing Material Specification (BMS) 8-39 polyurethane foam insulation. This,proposed AD also results from areport ~ITIAl.sISI(; '? ee, \ 1..-_ 

## t C1/L>Ve.,)

D ROUTING. y "U~ from the airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled with duct assemblies in th' INITIALS'~'~ ECS wrapped with BMS 8-39 polyurethane foam insulation, amaterial ofwhich the fir11r;>"H retardant properties deteriorate with age. We are issuing this AD to prevent apotential " Sy"OO~ electrical arc from igniting the BM3 8-39 polyurethane foam insulation on the duct assemblies ofthe ECS, which could propagate a small fire and lead to alarger fire that might spread throughout the airplane through the ECS. DATES: This AD iseffective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. iTlNGSy••ll()~
# TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

RESIDENTIAL WATER HEATERS

Including: Regulatory Impact Analysis

January 2001

U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Building Research and Standards Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy by staff members of the Energy Analysis Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Chapter 4 was contributed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Chapter 13 and Appendix H were contributed by Arthur D. Little Company
No. 10-6905.

#### Sonny Lauren Harmon, Petitioner v. Jimmy Keith, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1113, 131 S. Ct. 827,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9648.

178 L. Ed. 2d 564,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 770.
lull iUY I I P 2: 55

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, D.C 20590

RE: Exemption No. 8125C

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-16009

To whom it may concern:

Richard E. Druschel

7437 Pine Vista Drive

Brighton, MI 48116

May 1, 2012

Exemption No. 8125C from 14 CFRPart 91.109(a), 14 CFR Part 91.109(b) will expire on 09/30/2012.

This exemption allows me to conduct certain types of training in Beech aircraft with "throw-over" type

control yokes. This allows me to provide necessary training for those who do not have "conventional"

dual controls in their aircraft. Renting and/or buying dual controls for short "training periods" for these

types of aircraft can be and often is cost prohibitive. I provide a necessary and valuable source of

training for these pilots under this exemption.

I stipulate that there are no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety

that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

I further stipulate that I will abide by the conditions under which this exemption was granted.

It is my request and desire that this exemption be renewed without delay.

Richard E. Druschel

810-225-0840

rdruschel@comcast.net
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














I,
      Albert
      E. Sisto, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2006 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of hi/fn, inc.








February
                9, 2007
            /s/
                ALBERT E. SISTOAlbert
                E. SistoInterim
                Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Technical Information Service


NTIS Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Partially Closed Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Technical Information 
Service Advisory Board (the ``Board'') will meet on Wednesday, July 22, 
1998, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., and from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The 
session from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., will be closed to the Public.
    The Board was established under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 
3704b(c), and was Chartered on September 15, 1989. The Board is 
composed of five members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce who are 
eminent in such fields as information resources management, information 
technology, and library and information services. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review and make recommendations regarding general 
policies and operations of NTIS, including policies in connection with 
fees and charges for its services. The agenda will include a progress 
report on NTIS activities, an update on the progress of FedWorld, and a 
discussion of NTIS' long range plans. The closed session discussion is 
scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 12:30 p.m. on July 22, 1998. 
The session will be closed because premature disclosure of the 
information to be discussed would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of NTIS' business plans.

DATES: The meeting will convene on July 22, 1998, at 8:30 a.m. and 
adjourn at 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Room 2029 Sills Building, 
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, Virginia 22161.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
from 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on July 22, 1998. Approximately thirty 
minutes will be set aside on July 22, 1998, for comments or questions 
from the public. Seats will be available for the public and for the 
media on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of the public may 
submit written comments concerning the Board's affairs at any time. 
Copies of the minutes of the open session meeting will be available 
within thirty days of the meeting from the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board Secretary, National Technical 
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 
Telephone: (703) 605-6400; Fax (703) 487-4093.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Donald W. Corrigan,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 98-17693 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2904 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2904

   To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to extend 
   certain supervisory authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
 Protection to include assessing compliance with the Military Lending 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2019

   Mr. Barr introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to extend 
   certain supervisory authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
 Protection to include assessing compliance with the Military Lending 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Protection for Our 
Military Families Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU EXAMINATION AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO MILITARY LENDING 
              ACT COMPLIANCE.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 1024(b)(1)(A), by inserting before the 
        semicolon the following: ``and section 987 of title 10, United 
        States Code''; and
            (2) in section 1025(b)(1)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
                subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
                following:
                    ``(B) assessing compliance with the requirements of 
                section 987 of title 10, United States Code;''.
                                 <all>
```
Schmeltz, Rachel 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> 

Wednesday, December 16, 2015 6:02 PM 

Schmeltz, Rachel 

Friedman, Kristina; Vanlare, Paula; Tate, Ragan; Banks, Julius; Laity, Jim 

Conclusion of EO 12866 and 13563 Review: EPA Proposed Rule-- 2015 Revisions and 

Confidentiality Determinations for Data Elements Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting 

Rule (RIN 2060-AS60) 

This email serves as notice that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has concluded its review with a conclusion 

action of consistent with change under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 of the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA) proposed rule titled 2015 Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Data Elements Under the 

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (RIN 2060-A$60). 

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. 

Aaron L. Szabo 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Management and Budget 

202-395-3621 

Aaron L Szabo@omb.eop.gov