alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-7409.

#### Cheryl L. Rowe, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

562 U.S. 1153, 131 S. Ct. 942,

178 L. Ed. 2d 780,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 148,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 583.
```

[Federal Register: August 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 167)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 52859]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30au10-2]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 13, 47, and 91

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0118; Amdt. Nos. 13-34, 47-29, 91-318]
RIN 2120-AI89

 
Re-Registration and Renewal of Aircraft Registration; OMB 
Approval of Information Collection

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; approval of the information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces Office of Management and Budget's 
(OMB's) approval of the information collection requirement contained in 
the FAA's final rule, ``Re-Registration and Renewal of Aircraft 
Registration,'' which was published on July 20, 2010.

DATES: The FAA received OMB approval for the information collection 
requirements in 14 CFR part 47 on August 16, 2010. The rule becomes 
effective on October 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John G. Bent, Civil Aviation Registry, 
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard, 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169; telephone: (405) 954-4331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 20, 2010, the FAA published the 
final rule, ``Re-Registration and Renewal of Aircraft Registration'' 
(75 FR 41968). Over a 3-year period, this rule will terminate the 
registration of all aircraft registered before October 1, 2010, and 
will require the re-registration of each aircraft to retain U.S. civil 
aircraft status. The rule also establishes a system for a 3-year 
recurrent expiration and renewal of registration for all aircraft 
issued a registration certificate on or after October 1, 2010. The 
final rule amends the FAA's regulations to provide standards for the 
timely cancellation of registration (N-numbers) for unregistered 
aircraft. This final rule makes other minor changes to establish 
consistency and ensure the regulations conform to statute or current 
Registry practices. The amendments will improve the accuracy of the 
Civil Aviation Registry.
    The rule contained information collection requirements that had not 
yet been approved by the Office of Management and Budget at the time of 
publication. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB 
approved that request on August 16, 2010, and assigned the information 
collection OMB Control Number 2120-0729. The FAA request was approved 
by OMB for a term of 18 months and expires on February 29, 2010. This 
notice is being published to inform affected parties of the approval of 
the information collection requirements of 14 CFR part 47.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24, 2010.
Dennis R. Pratte, II,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-21561 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE 

INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY

PETITION OF: D.K. AND A.A.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2018, in consideration of the Petition for 

Relief through the Exercise of this Court’s King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary 

Jurisdiction, this Court assumes jurisdiction over this matter. The temporary redaction of 

Petitioners’ names and other identifying information from Report 1 of the Fortieth 

Statewide Investigating Grand Jury is made permanent. See In re Fortieth Statewide 

Investigating Grand Jury, 190 A.3d 560 (Pa. 2018); In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating 

Grand Jury, 2018 WL _________ (Pa. Dec. 3, 2018). 

The Motion for Leave to File under Seal is GRANTED. The Motion to Unseal and 

the Application to Lift Stay are DENIED. 

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

The instant order is unsealed.
# C_2015236EN.01001402.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 May 2015 — JAS Jet Air Service France (SARL) v European Commission

(Case C-53/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Customs union and Common Customs Tariff - Community Customs Code - Article 239 - Community Customs Code Implementing Regulation - Article 905 - Importation of jean trousers from the United States - Import duties - Decision declaring the refund of those duties unjustified - No ‘special situation’))

(2015/C 236/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: JAS Jet Air Service France (SARL) (represented by: T. Gallois and E. Dereviankine, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, B.-R. Killmann and C. Soulay, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders JAS Jet Air Service France SARL to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JAS Jet Air Service France SARL to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1



                Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We have issued our reports dated August 30, 2006, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements, schedule and management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of
Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. on
Form S-3ASR (File No. 333-131886, effective February 16, 2006), on Form S-3
(File No. 333-129234, effective October 25, 2005, File No. 333-129232, effective
October 25, 2005, File No. 333-122961, effective February 23, 2005, File No.
333-121167, effective December 10, 2004, File No. 333-42758, effective August 1,
2000, File No. 333-50749, effective April 22, 1998 and File No. 333-05709,
effective June 11, 1996) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-84398, effective
March 15, 2002 and File No. 33-92918, effective May 31, 1995).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Southfield, Michigan
August 30, 2006













                                      146
#### In the Matter of Tyzavier M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Shanice M., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[65 NYS3d 125]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about September 2, 2015, which, upon a finding of neglect, placed the child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services until the next permanency hearing then scheduled for December 16, 2015, and directed respondent mother to comply with her mental health services, including medication management and dyadic therapy, and to obtain stable housing with on site services, unanimously affirmed, with respect to the finding of neglect, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs, as moot.

“[A] [parent’s] mental condition may form the basis of a finding of neglect if it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his or her condition resulted in imminent danger to the child” *(Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.],*81 AD3d 37, 42 [1st Dept 2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Proof *579of past or present harm to the child is not necessary when the evidence demonstrates that the child is at risk of harm based on demonstrable conduct by the parent *(Matter of Jacob L. [Chasitiy P.],*121 AD3d 502 [1st Dept 2014]). As such, “the court need not wait for a child to be harmed before extending its protective cloak around [the] child” *(Matter of Noah Jeremiah J.*at 42 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

At the time the Administration for Children’s Services brought the petition, the child was approximately 14 months old. The record reflects that the mother has a history of mental illness and hospitalizations, including two involuntary hospitalizations that occurred after the birth of the child. The mother advised her caseworker that the child resided with the maternal grandmother during her hospitalizations, but did not know how he got there. The Covenant House records show that the mother missed appointments, resisted filling out paperwork, and engaged in other inappropriate behaviors including screaming in hallways and threatening staff. Family Court also took into account incidents at the Covenant House when the mother incorrectly administered asthma medication to the child and used the stairs while the child was in his stroller.

Based on the foregoing, Family Court’s finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and we decline to disturb the court’s fact-finding determination that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the mother’s mental illness *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]).

The challenge to the disposition is moot since the order expired by its own terms and the child has been returned to the mother’s care.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern and Oing, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          43,544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,621
<INVENTORY>                                     47,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,037
<PP&E>                                          67,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,721
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,073
<SALES>                                        220,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,176
<CGS>                                           71,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-843092

Applicants: San Antonio Zoological Gardens and Aquarium, San 
Antonio. TX.

    The applicant requests a permit to import 4.4 live Japanese Giant 
Salamanders (Andrias japonicus), bred in captivity by the Asa 
Zoological Park, Hiroshima, Japan, for the purpose of enhancement of 
the species through captive breeding and exhibition.

PRT-841435

Applicant: Panamerican Marketing, San Antonio, TX.

    The applicant requests a permit to export 1.2 live ring-tailed 
lemurs (Lemur catta) to Promotora Zoofari, Morelos, Mexico for the 
purpose of enhancement of the propagation and survival of the species 
through captive breeding.

PRT-831689

Applicant: University of Wisconsin, Dept. of Zoology, Madison, WI.

    The applicant requests a permit to import blood and feather samples 
taken from captive-held and wild caught Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) 
in South America, for the purpose of scientific research.

PRT-844311

Applicant: Geraldine Mr. Stallman, Salem, WI.

    The applicant requests a permit to import the sport-hunted trophy 
of one male bonetebok (Damaliscus pygargus dorcas) culled from a 
captive herd maintained under the management program of the Republic of 
South Africa, for the purpose of enhancement of the survival of the 
species.
    Writtend data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice. U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104): FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
MaryEllen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 98-17524 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-U
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00207-CR

IN RE WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator William M. Windsor’s petition for writ of mandamus against the 

Respondent trial-court judge is denied, and his petition for writ of mandamus against the 

Respondent district clerk is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

(Justice Davis concurring)

Denied and dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 31, 2016

Do not publish

[OT06]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael A. Brochu,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ MICHAEL A. BROCHU
---------------------------
Michael A. Brochu
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2005

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Loudeye Corp. and will be retained by Loudeye Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)the
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and





(2)the
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      18, 2007


/S/
      Hyung
      Soon Lee


Principal
      Executive Officer


Principal
      Financial Officer
# C_2014431EN.01001701.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Marc Hußock, Ute Hußock, Michelle Hußock, Florian Hußock v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-316/14) (1)

1

(2014/C 431/27)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

I, William L. Stephens, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light****of the circumstances
under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the consolidated financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing****and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
> controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
> material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
> subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
> during the period in which this report is being prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
> procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
> the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
> report based on our evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over
> financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
> that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
> registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
> of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
> adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
> financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
> employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
> financial reporting

Date:  August 14, 2003

|/s/ | William L. Stephens
 William L. Stephens
 President and Chief Executive Officer
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
J. Eaken, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ Kenneth J. Eaken

Kenneth J. Eaken
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
#### Patrick Henry, Appellant, v Karen McGeachy, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 561]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated October 1, 2015, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, *704and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In support of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injury to the lumbar region of the plaintiff’s spine did not constitute a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury to the lumbar region of his spine under the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Hall, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.