alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Davon Suber, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 882]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered September 15, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber, Oing, JJ.
Order filed March 26, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00649-CV

____________

DAVID L. GLASSEL, Appellant

V.

SEAMLESS OPERATING GROUP, LLC INDIVIDUALLY AND 

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF CHEMICAL FREE SOLUTIONS, 

LLC., AND CEDAR OIL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-41601

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due March 2, 2015. No brief or motion for further 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before April 20, 2015, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
# C_2015016EN.01002403.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Dorothea Eckert, Karl-Heinz Dallner v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-380/14) (1)

(2015/C 016/39)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014.

---
# DLA awards Columbus associates for achievement in 2015

/ Published Dec. 17, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Several associates and a team with DLA Land and Maritime were awarded by the agency for superior work in 2015 at the 48th Annual DLA Employee Recognition Ceremony Dec. 10 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex in Ft. Belvoir, Va.DLA Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch presented awards to individuals and teams from throughout the agency at the ceremony. Hosting the ceremony for the first time as the agency’s director, he said that as he travels the world, the agency is universally appreciated by its customers thanks to the hard work of everyone in the agency. “I meet great DLA employees—sometimes its hundreds working all together, sometimes it’s just one person in an office at a base that does something for us—but they’re great people and motivated with a sense of mission that makes DLA just a great place to work,” Busch said. “The reward recipients today are representatives of the larger body of folks I see when I travel around the agency.”Escorted to the ceremony by Navy Rear Adm. John King, Land and Maritime commander, the six awardees were:-- Outstanding DLA Personnel of the Year (Civilian Grades 7-12): Natalya Radyk, Maritime Supplier Operations-- Outstanding DLA Personnel of the Year (Civilian Grades 13-15): Don Schulze, Maritime Customer Operations-- Achievement in Equal Employment Opportunity by an employee: Debra Hobbs-- Excellence in Time to Award Team Award: Maritime Supplier Operations team-- Excellence in Procurement Analysis: Travis Robertson, Strategic Acquisition Programs-- DLA Joint Reserve Force Junior Officer of the Year: Army Capt. Vince Barber“I couldn’t be more proud to be the Commander of this great organization,” King said. “The winners and nominees from Land and Maritime demonstrated why the professionalism we foster here in Columbus is second to none."I would also like to say thank you to the supervisors, for taking the time to put together the nomination packets and ensure that the hard work of these associates received the recognition they earned."In all, 50 awards were presented to individuals and teams from throughout the agency.
December 17, 2015

M S

. CONNIE S. PYATT

VICE PRESIDENT

SKY HELICOPTERS , INC.

2559 SOUTH JUPITER R OAD GARLAND, TX 75041

Dear M s. Pyatt :

This is in response to your December 11, 2015 letter posted to the public docket ( No. FAA

20 1 3

- 0319 ) petitioning the Federal Aviatio n Administration on behalf of SKY Helicopters,

Inc. ( SKY Helicopters ) for an exemption from part 12 1, Appendices I and J of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) . That exemption, if granted, would allow SKY Helicopters

to cover its safety

- sensiti ve employees under one testing program

. That exemption, however, expired April 30, 2014. Therefore, the FAA will treat this request as a new petition.

Although the petitioner requested relief from part 121, Appendices I and J, that section has

since bee n redesignated to part 120. The redesignation was included in the “Drug and Alcohol Testing Program” final rule published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2009 (74 FR 22649).

In addition, o n July 15, 2013 , the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alco hol Testing Programs final r ule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on

demand operators that conduct commercial air tour operations . The final rule allows operators like you to combine your drug and alcohol testing into one te sting program without requiring an exemption . A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.2 I have also enclosed in formation about how to notify the FAA of your intent to cover both

programs. If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267

- 8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brando n Roberts Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3 Project No.: A FS

- 13

- 4 48

- E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM

- 10 1:KJone s: 12/16/2015 :Doc# 54643

ARM

- 1/100/104:Program Office AAM

- 800

MS. CONNIE S. PYATT

VICE PRESIDENT

SKY HELI COPTERS, INC.

2559 SOUTH JUPITER R OAD GARLAND, TX 75041
No. 10-6196.

#### Stephen C. Johnson, Petitioner v. Roy A. Castro, Warden.

562 U.S. 1012, 131 S. Ct. 525,

178 L. Ed. 2d 387,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8589.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 788.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1
                                                                    ------------

[LOGO]                 ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORPORATION
                                 CODE OF ETHICS
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

The Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and senior financial officers hold
important and elevated roles in corporate governance in that they are uniquely
capable and empowered to ensure that shareholders, creditors and other
stakeholders' interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved.
This policy emphasizes the role of the CEO and senior financial officers in the
conduct and practice of financial management and provides that the CEO and
senior financial officers shall follow and advocate.

SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
Senior financial officers include the Company's Chief Financial Officer ("CEO"),
Controller, and the chairperson of the Company's disclosure committee should
those positions exist by name or responsibility.

HONESTY AND INTEGRITY
The CEO and senior financial officers shall observe high standards of business
and personal ethics and practice honesty and integrity in every respect of
dealing with the public, the business community, stockholders and government
authorities.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
The CEO and senior financial officers shall comply with applicable laws,
regulations and related rules and are prohibited from engaging in any activities
that could involve the Company in any unlawful practice.

AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
The CEO and senior financial officers shall not engage in apparent, potential or
actual conflicts of interest, improper solicitation of business, conflicts based
on outside interests and political contributions of Company funds.

FULL, FAIR, ACCURATE, TIMELY AND UNDERSTANDABLE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The CEO and senior financial officers are responsible for the Company's
accounting controls and procedures, and the protection of shareholder interests.
The responsibility includes the full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable
disclosure in reports and documents filed or submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, American Stock Exchange, public communications made by the
Company, other regulatory or required reports and internal reports.

COMPLIANCE
The CEO and senior financial officers shall comply with this Code and the ETC
Code of Conduct. Failure to comply with this Code or the ETC Code of Conduct
will result in appropriate sanctions administered with principles of fairness
and equity, up to and including termination of employment.
### Swanson
. Bria n (OST) 

## t>PT ' o^T ' "2^0 0 - e>'^-=F 3 From : Sent : To : Subject : Aloha , Anuhea_Naeol e @ nps.go v Thursday , Decembe r29 , 201 1 4:1 4 P M Devany , Denni s (OST) ; EA S (OST ) Answe rto Pacifi cWing s

Mynam e i s Anuhe a Naeol e an d I' m currentl ya STE P wit h th e Kalaupap a NPS
. I' m a studen tworke rwh o come s dow n t o Kalaupap a t o wor k durin g m ybreak s an d hav e bee n workin g dow n her e fo rth e pas ttw o years . I'v e ha d man yproblem s wit h Pacifi c Wing s fro m bein g unreliabl e an d definitel yunaffordable
. Bein g a colleg e studen twh o goe s t o schoo l i n Portland , Orego n I pa ycheape rflight s t o g o fro m topsid e Moloka i t o Portland , Oregon
. Howi s a tri p fro m to p sid e Moloka i t o Oah u the n t o Portland , Orego n cheape rtha n goin g fro m Kalaupap a t o to p side ? Wit h Makan i Ka i I wa s abl e t o fl yi n an d ou to fKalaupap a fo ra reasonabl e pric e tha t I ca n afford
. I d o NO T suppor tPacifi cWing s an d strongl yprefe rMakan i Ka i fo rthei raffordabl e price s an d thei rexcellen tservices
. I n th e pas ttw o week s tha tI hav e bee n workin g dow n her e bot h m yparent s ha d t o fl yi n an d ou tfo rmedica l reasons . Wit h Makan i Ka i starting , the ywer e abl e t o fl yi n an d ou tnumerou s time s an d didn' thav e t o stres s o n financia l burden s becaus e the ycoul d affor d th e flight s tha t Makan i Ka i ha s t o offer
. S o Makan i Ka i ha s bee n suc h a grea tservic e fo reveryon e no tjus t myself
. The yhav e reasonabl e flight s an d the yhav e bee n suc h a pleasur e wit h costume rservic e an d fligh tshechedule s tha t wor k fo reveryone . I d o NO Tsuppor tPacifi cWing s Petitio n an d woul d lov e t o se e tha tMakan i Ka i stay s her e fo rman yyear s t o come . Mahalo , Anuhe a Naeol e
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5250

_____________________________

CLAUDE LAMITE BULLARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John T. Brown, Judge.

November 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nigee Williams, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 920]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), rendered April 28, 2016, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *id.] Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Mastro, J.P, Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Dynamics Research Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (File Nos. 33-59706, 33-47838, 33-02805 and 33-68548), of Dynamics Research Corporation of our report dated March 26, 2003, with respect to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Dynamics Research Corporation and Subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, andall related financial statement schedules, which report is included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Dynamics Research Corporation, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 26, 2003 

 

*1*
EXHIBIT
32.A

















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ending  December 31, 2009, of El Paso Natural Gas Company
(the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Cleary, President, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James J.
      ClearyJames J.
      ClearyPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)El Paso
      Natural Gas Company
   March 1,
      2010



































A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                                                      Exhibit 10(f)





                            August 12, 1997


Mr. James H. DeVries
467 Willow Road
Winnetka, IL 60093


                            RE:  CONSULTING AGREEMENT
                                           

Dear Jim:

    I am writing to summarize our agreement with respect to your performance of
consulting services for Quixote Corporation between July 1, 1997 and October 31,
1997, especially in connection with the upcoming DVA trial.

    Quixote will pay you at a rate of $160 per hour, subject to a maximum of
eight (8) hours per day.  Quixote is paying the current lease payments on your
Audi automobile, but you are responsible for gasoline, maintenance and
insurance.  We do not anticipate being charged for any commuting time to the
Chicago office.  You will also submit a weekly schedule of your activities to
me, and all air travel plans, both of which will be approved in advance.  We
anticipate that invoices for your services and expenses shall be provided
monthly within 15 business days after the end of each month.  Quixote will
reimburse your travel expenses upon receipt of our standard expense account
form.


                                                   Sincerely,


                                                  /s/ Leslie J. Jezuit
                                                   ------------------------


                                                 Agreed:  /s/ James H. DeVries
                                                 -----------------------------
No. 10-7611.

#### Michael O. DeVaughn, Petitioner v. Stanley Sniff, Sheriff, Riverside County, California.

562 U.S. 1202, 131 S. Ct. 1047,

178 L. Ed. 2d 868,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 946.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2413

                 For the relief of Richard M. Sakakida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 23 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Richard M. Sakakida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD OF MEDAL FOR HEROISM.

    (a) Review of Records.--(1) The Secretary of the Army shall review 
the military records of Richard M. Sakakida of Fremont, California. The 
purpose of the review is to determine whether the award to Richard M. 
Sakakida of a medal or cross authorized under section 3741, 3742, or 
3746 of title 10, United States Code, for any action of Richard M. 
Sakakida in the Philippines during World War II is appropriate.
    (2) The determination under paragraph (2) whether the award of a 
medal or cross is appropriate shall be governed by the standards that 
apply to the medal or cross concerned under the provision of law 
authorizing the medal or cross.
    (b) Award.--Notwithstanding section 3744(b) of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary may award to Richard M. Sakakida of Fremont, 
California, a medal or cross referred to in subsection (a) if the 
Secretary determines in accordance with the review required under that 
subsection that the award of the medal or cross, as the case may be, is 
appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013207EN.01005001.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/50

---

Action brought on 15 May 2013 — Now Wireless/OHIM — Starbucks (HK) (now)

(Case T-278/13)

2013/C 207/82

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Now Wireless Ltd (Guildford, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Starbucks (HK) Ltd (Hong Kong, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision; and

| — | Order Community Trade Mark Registration No 1421700 to be revoked on grounds of non-use; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Community Trade Mark Registration No 1421700 to be revoked on grounds of non-use;

| — | Order the registered proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the registered proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘now’ for services in classes 35, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark No 1 421 700

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partially revoked the Community trade mark registration

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Vote
Power Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  September 30,
2007 (the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities
as Chief Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 30, 2008            By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   CEO and
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (the
"Company") on Form 10KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Kane, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.



                               /s/ John Kane
                              -------------------
                              John Kane
                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                              and Chief Financial Officer


December 18, 2003
No. 10-7598.

#### Lorenzo Arredondo-Duenas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 952,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 193.

178 L. Ed. 2d 785,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 376.