35140 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 1998 /Rules and Regulations

PART 404—[AMENDED]

10. The authority citation for

redesignated part 404, Title 46, Code of

Federal Regulations is revised to read as

follows:

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2104(a), 8105, 9303,

9304; 49 CFR 1.46 (mmm).

11. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove the word ‘‘Director’’ and add, in

its place, the word ‘‘Commandant’’ in

the following sections:

a. Section 401.210(a)(4);

b. Section 401.210(a)(7);

c. Section 401.220(b);

d. Section 401.240(d);

e. Section 401.320(d)(2);

f. Section 401.320(d)(3);

g. Section 401.510(b)(3), introductory

text

h. Section 401.710(g); and

i. Section 401.100.

12. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove the words ‘‘Saint Lawrence

Seaway Development Corporation’’ and

add, in their place, the words ‘‘U.S.

Coast Guard’’ in the following sections:

a. Section 401.211(e);

b. Section 401.230(c);

c. Section 401.230(d);

d. Section 401.240(a);

e. Section 401.250(c);

f. Section 401.320(d)(4);

g. Section 401.425;

h. Section 401.510(b)(2);

i. Section 401.510(b)(3);

j. Section 401.600(a);

k. Section 401.615(b); and

l. Section 401.620(a).

13. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove the word ‘‘Administrator’’ and

add, in its place, the word

‘‘Commandant’’ in the following

sections:

a. Section 401.615(b); and

b. Section 401.650.

14. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove all references to ‘‘404’’ and add,

in their place, ‘‘401’’ in the following

sections:

a. 401.210(a)(8);

b. 401.210(b);

c. 401.211(a)(1), (b) and (3);

d. 401.230(e);

e. 401.240(b);

f. 401.320(b);

g. 401.330(a);

h. 401.335(a)(1);

i. 401.340(a) and (c);

j. 401.400(c);

k. 401.405 introductory text;

l. 401.410 introductory text;

m. 401.420(a);

n. 401.425;

o. 401.438;

p. 401.431(a), (f) and (g);

q. 401.451(a)(1);

r. 401.600(b);

s. 401.620(b);

t. 401.645;

u. 401.700(b);

v. 401.710(e);

w. 401.720(b);

x. 401.100;

y. 401.210(a);

z. 401.320(a) introductory text;

aa. 403.100;

bb. 403.400(c);

cc. 404.1(a);

15. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove all references to ‘‘405’’ and add,

in their place, ‘‘402’’ in the following

sections:

a. 401.340(a);

b. 401.710.(d) and (e).

16. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove all references to ‘‘406’’ and add,

in their place, ‘‘403’’ in the following

sections:

a. 401.320(d)(3);

b. Part 404, Appendix A. Step 1.A.

17. In addition to the above

amendments to Chapter III of Title 46,

remove all references to ‘‘407’’ and add,

in their place, ‘‘404’’ in the following

sections:

a. 403.120(b);

b. 404.1(b);

c. 404.10(a);

c. 404, Appendix A, Step 1.B;

d. 404, Appendix C, introductory text.

Dated: June 24, 1998.

J.P. High,

Acting Assistant Commandant for Marine

Safety and Environmental Protection.

[FR Doc. 98–17269 Filed 6–26–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–15–M

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

39 CFR Part 3001

[Docket No. MC96–1; Order No. 1214]

Amendments to Domestic Mail

Classification Schedule

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This final rule revises the

Domestic Mail Classification Schedule

(DMCS) by eliminating provisions

related to a barcoded small parcel

experiment. These provisions expired

April 28, 1998. Given the status of the

experiment and the Postal Service’s

intention not to request an extension or

seek a permanent classification,

elimination of these provisions will

ensure that the DMCS accurately reflects

current classifications and discounts.

DATES: This rule was effective April 28,

1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,

Postal Rate Commission, 1333 H Street

NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20268–

0001, 202–789–6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the

provisions recommended by the

Commission and approved by the

Governors in Docket No. MC96–1,

Experimental First-Class and Priority

Mail Small Parcel Automation Rate

Category, specified that the experiment

would be limited to a two-year period,

ending April 28, 1998. Shortly before

the expiration date, the Postal Service

published a notice in the Federal

Register stating its intention to allow

the experiment to end on the scheduled

expiration date without filing a request

with the Commission to establish

permanent classifications and

discounts. The notice also briefly

reviewed the basic objectives of the

experiment and the reasons why the

Service decided against pursuing a

permanent classification. See generally

63 FR 19407–19408 (April 20, 1998).

For the reasons stated above, the

Commission hereby adopts the

following amendment to the DMCS,

which is incorporated by reference in

the Code of Federal Regulations (see 39

CFR part 3001, Appendix A to Subpart

C—Postal Service Rates and Charges).

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3001

Administrative practice and

procedure, Postal Service.

For reasons set out in the preamble,

the Commission amends 39 CFR part

3001 as follows:

PART 3001—RULES OF PRACTICE

AND PROCEDURE

1. The authority citation for 39 CFR

part 3001 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 404(b), 3603, 3622–

3624, 3661, 3662.

Subpart C—Rules Applicable to

Requests for Establishing or Changing

the Mail Classification Schedule

Appendix A to Subpart C—[Amended]

2. Appendix A to Subpart C—Postal

Service Rates and Charges is amended

as follows:

a. Remove 221.4.

b. Remove and reserve 223.4.

c. Remove ‘‘Pre-barcoded parcels

(experimental)’’ and footnote 11 in FirstClass Mail Rate Schedule 221, Letters

and Sealed Parcels.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 1998 /Rules and Regulations 35141

d. Remove note 5 in First-Class Mail

Rate Schedule 223 Priority Mail

Subclass.

Dated: June 23, 1998.

Margaret P. Crenshaw,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–17249 Filed 6–26–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IN85–1a; FRL–6115–7]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plan; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: On February 25, 1994, the

State of Indiana submitted regulations

as a revision to the ozone State

Implementation Plan (SIP), governing

the control of Volatile Organic

Compound (VOC) emissions from

graphic arts sources in Lake and Porter

Counties. EPA approved these

regulations on May 4, 1995, subject to

the condition that the State adopt

appropriate record keeping and

reporting requirements. On July 24,

1997, the State of Indiana submitted a

SIP revision request to the EPA

containing, among other things, record

keeping and reporting requirements for

all graphic arts sources in Indiana. VOC

is one of the air pollutants which

combine on hot, sunny summer days

with oxides of nitrogen to form groundlevel ozone, commonly known as smog,

in and downwind of significant source

areas, such as large urban areas. Ozone

pollution is of particular concern

because of its harmful effects on lung

tissue and breathing passages. The

State’s rule revisions are designed to

meet the Clean Air Act (Act)

requirement for States to adopt

Reasonably Available Control

Technology (RACT) rules for sources

that are covered by Control Techniques

Guideline (CTG) documents or that are

major sources for VOC. This rulemaking

action approves, through direct final

action, the Indiana SIP revision request

as it pertains to graphic arts sources.

DATES: The ‘‘direct final’’ rule is

effective on August 28, 1998, unless

EPA receives adverse or critical written

comments by July 29, 1998. If adverse

comments are received, EPA will

publish a timely withdrawal of the rule

in the Federal Register informing the

public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision

request are available for inspection at

the following address: U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that

you telephone Mark J. Palermo at (312)

886–6082 before visiting the Region 5

Office.)

Written comments should be sent to:

J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, Regulation

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist,

at (312) 886–6057.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On November 15, 1990, Congress

enacted amendments to the Clean Air

Act; Pub. L. 101–549, 104 Stat. 2399,

codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Section 182(b)(2) of the Act requires

all States with moderate and above

ozone nonattainment areas to adopt

RACT rules for VOC sources that are

located within these ozone

nonattainment areas and that are

covered by CTG documents. One source

category to be controlled by application

of RACT rules is graphic arts.

In Indiana, VOC emission control

requirements for graphic arts sources are

contained in Indiana Administrative

Code (IAC) rule 326 IAC 8–5–5. This

rule applies to packaging rotogravure,

publication rotogravure, and

flexographic printing sources. On

February 25, 1994, the State of Indiana

submitted a revision request for its

ozone SIP amending the graphic arts

rule. This amendment functioned to

reduce the source size applicability cutoff for graphic arts sources located in

the severe ozone nonattainment area

(Lake and Porter Counties) from 100 to

25 tons of VOC per year (potential to

emit) as required by sections 182(b)(2)

and 182(d) of the Act.

Based on a review of the February 25,

1994 submittal, the EPA proposed to

conditionally approve the rule revision

on January 10, 1995 (60 FR 2568), and

completed final rulemaking to

conditionally approve the SIP revision

on May 4, 1995 (60 FR 22241). At that

time, the EPA stated that, although the

revised rule contained acceptable VOC

emission control requirements for

graphic arts sources, it did not include

specific record keeping and reporting

requirements needed to make the rule

sufficiently enforceable. EPA’s

conditional approval was based on a

December 14, 1994 commitment from

the State to correct the rule to add

appropriate record keeping and

reporting requirements.

The rule revisions submitted by the

Indiana Department of Environmental

Management (IDEM) on July 24, 1997,

were designed, in part, to provide the

record keeping and reporting

requirements for graphic arts sources.

The submittal also includes additional

revisions to rule 326 IAC 8–5–5. These

rule revisions are addressed in this

rulemaking.

IDEM’s July 24, 1997 submittal also

includes rule revisions for

miscellaneous metal coating sources

that employ the use of dip tanks or flow

coating operations. These rule revisions

will be addressed in a separate, future

rulemaking.

II. Summary of Rule Revisions

In the discussion which follows, to

remain consistent with definitions used

by IDEM (these definitions differ in

some respect from those used by other

States and from those typically used by

the EPA (EPA typically reverses the

following definitions)), the following

definitions are used in this rulemaking:

Facility means any one (1) structure, piece

of equipment, installation, or operation

which emits or has the potential to emit any

air contaminant. Single pieces of equipment

or single installations with multiple emission

points shall be considered as a single facility.

Source means an aggregation of one (1) or

more facilities which are located on one

piece of property or on contiguous or

adjacent properties, and which are owned or

operated by the same person (or by persons

under common control).

These definitions are found in Indiana’s

rules 326 IAC 1–2–27 and 326 IAC 1–

2–72, respectively.

The following summarizes the

contents of the newly adopted rules or

the adopted revisions to the existing

rules.

Rule 326 IAC 8–1–9

This rule has been adopted to cover

general record keeping and reporting

requirements for graphic arts sources

subject to new rules 326 IAC 8–1–10

through 326 IAC 8–1–12. Rule 326 IAC

8-1–9 states that the applicable test

methods and procedures specified in

rule 326 IAC 8–1–4 (testing procedures)

shall be used to determine: (1) the VOC

content of each coating as applied; and

(2) the efficiency of each emissions

capture system and control device.

Records required by this rule, including

those used to demonstrate source

exemption from applicable emission

control requirements, must be submitted

to IDEM or EPA upon request. All