alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 214 (Monday, November 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 66462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26933]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The charter for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean 
Air Act Advisory committee (CAAAC) will be renewed for an additional 
two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public 
interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The purpose of CAAAC is to 
provide advice and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on policy 
issues associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act.
    It is determined that CAAAC is in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.
    Inquiries may be directed to Pat Childers, CAAAC Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. EPA, Mail Code 6102A, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington DC 20460, or by email, childers.pat@epa.gov.

    Dated: October 23, 2012.
Elizabeth A. Shaw,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2012-26933 Filed 11-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-255-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 24, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised sheet 
bearing a proposed effective date of August 1, 1998:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 456

    Columbia states that pursuant to the Commission's Order issued 
April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-1-007 (Order No. 587-G) Standards for 
Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Columbia 
tenders for filing the above listed tariff sheet adopting Version 1.2 
as the current GISB standards. Columbia is also revising Sheet No. 456 
to incorporate, by reference, Standard 4.3.16 (Version 1.2) which 
states that documents identified in GISB Standard 4.3.6 should be made 
available in HTML or RTF format.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any peson wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17901 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
8
1

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION SAN JOAQUIN AND AFGE LOCAL 1546 &
LOCALLY NEGOTIATED OPERATING PROCEDURE
ARTICLE 6 USE OF OFFICIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES

ECTION 1.D. USE BY UNION

The Employer and the Union will have access to resources such as telecommunication
devices and interpreters to communicate with the employees whom are Deaf, hard of
hearing and speech impaired.

The Union will have access to issued items available through J6, e.g. copier, scanner, and
printer.

The Employer agrees to provide adequate space on all official bulletin boards for official
union use or provide and install/mount bulletin board next to, or near the official bulletin
board for union use.

The Employer agrees to provide marked parking spaces at the union office. The union
office parking spaces will be as close to the union office as practicable.

The Employer will make Wi-Fi internet access available to the union office.

The Union office will be used for the exclusive use of the Union and will be easily
accessible, providing for privacy for its users.

SECTION 1.E. USE BY UNION
1.

The Employer agrees that should the occasion arise, necessitating, the Union’s office be
relocated, the office space and facilities will meet the needs of both the union and the
agency. The Employer will provide the Union with adequate notification to make moving
arrangements, prior to relocation whether of temporary or permanent nature.

The Employer will move all government owned furniture and the union will move all
personal items. Distribution will provide the Union with available resources to assist with
completion of the move.

Section 2.B. USE BY EMPLOYEES
1.

The Employer will provide access to health and fitness centers during the fitness center
normal duty hours,

The agency will provide breakrooms as mutually agreed upon by both parties. Where
feasible, breakrooms will include refrigerators, microwaves, running water, tables, chairs,
air conditioning/heating, common use computer, and appropriate cleaning supplies.


F& the Union For the Employer

04/13/2022
DAMIANA L. MAGGIO ¢ ANTHONY ZUK
CHIEF NEGOTIATOR, UNION CHIEF NEGOTIATOR, AGENCY
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2976 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide authority to postpone 

certain deadlines by reason of State-declared disasters or emergencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself and Mr. KATKO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

authority to postpone certain deadlines by reason of 

State-declared disasters or emergencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filing Relief for Nat5 ural Disasters Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO POSTPONE FEDERAL TAX DEAD7 LINES BY REASON OF STATE-DECLARED DIS8 ASTERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7508A of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:14 Jun 10, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2976.IH H2976

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2976 IH

1 section (c) as subsection (d) and by inserting after sub2 section (b) the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(c) SPECIAL RULE FOR STATE-DECLARED DISAS4 TERS.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the request of the 

6 Governor of a State (or the Mayor, in the case of 

7 the District of Columbia) in which an emergency or 

8 disaster has been declared under State law, sub9 section (a) shall apply to such State-declared emer10 gency or disaster in the same manner as such sub11 sections apply to federally declared disasters. 

12 ‘‘(2) STATE.—For purposes of this section, the 

13 term ‘State’ includes the District of Columbia, the 

14 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, 

15 Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of 

16 the Northern Mariana Islands.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to declarations made after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                     TO THE
                            BUSINESS CREDIT AGREEMENT
                               DATED MAY 15, 2001
             BETWEEN CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE ("CIBC") AND
                            THE CUSTOMER NOTED BELOW

Customer:                                            CIBC Branch/Centre:
EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd.                        Knowledge-Based Business

                                                     2nd floor, 222 Queen Street

                                                     Ottawa, Ontario  K1P 5V9

AMENDMENTS.  The Agreement is amended as follows:

1.       CREDIT D - FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTRACTS.

The limit to this facility is increased to a maximum of $5,000,000 from
$2,500,000.

The $2,500,000 increase shall be deducted from the margin calculation for the
operating line, Credit A.


OTHER MATTERS. (1) The term "the Agreement" means the Business Credit Agreement
referred to above, as it may have been revised up to the date of this Amendment.
(2) Except as revised by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force.

Dated as of:   December 18, 2001

For CIBC:                  For the Customer:

By:                        By:                          By:



---------------------      -------------------------    ------------------------
Name:                      Name:                        Name:
David Edwards
---------------------      -------------------------    ------------------------
Title:                     Title:                       Title:
Director, KBB
---------------------      -------------------------    ------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Sundance Venture Partners, L.P. II (License No. 09/79-0416); 
Notice of Issuance of a Small Business Investment Company License

    On November 20, 1997, an application was filed by Sundance Venture 
Partners, L.P. II at 400 E. Van Buren, Suite 750, Phoenix, Arizona 
85004, with the Small Business Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 
107.300 of the Regulations governing small business investment 
companies (13 CFR 107.300 (1997)) for a license to operate as a small 
business investment company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 09/79-0416 on May 4, 1998, to Sundance Venture 
Partners, L.P. II, to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: May 8, 1998.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 98-16974 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT (32)(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

In connection with the Annual Report of The Empire District Electric Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William L. Gipson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By: |  | /s/ William L. Gipson
|--- |  | ---------------------

|Name:  |  | William L. Gipson                    
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | March 3, 2008                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District Electric Company and will be retained by The
Empire District Electric Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2013359EN.01001501.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/15

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-461/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery and the cancellation of any outstanding payments - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to show a prima facie case and urgency)

2013/C 359/28

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, abogado del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2013) 3204 final of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas (other than Castilla-La Mancha).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
No. 10-7977.

#### James R. Slater, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1205, 131 S. Ct. 1056,

178 L. Ed. 2d 873,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 978.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 996 A.2d 15.
**DAAN-47-01**

**Transportation Account Codes (TACs) for FOB Origin Vendor Shipments**

(March 2017)

First Destination Transportation (FDT) TAC – S8AF

Second Destination Transportation (SDT) TAC – S9NA

(End of Notice)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A2011. JAMES MONROE DAILEY v. THE STATE.

James Monroe Dailey has filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s order of

May 10, 2016, which denied his motions to set aside a void judgment and to recuse

the trial judge. We lack jurisdiction.

 Dailey filed an application for discretionary review of the same trial court

order, which we dismissed on the merits. See Case No. A16D0447 (dismissed on

July 14, 2016). “It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. 

The same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.” Echols v. State,

243 Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000);see also Jordan v. State, 253 Ga. App.

510, 511 (2) (559 SE2d 528) (2002). Our ruling in the prior appeal is res judicata. 

Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Thus, Dailey is

estopped from seeking further judicial review on these issues. See id.; see also Ross

v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 328 (713 SE2d 438) (2011). Accordingly, this application

for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/23/2016

August 23, 2016
# Chemical

# QM Explanation

# Shelf Life Codes
When you have 

to get a needle 

stuck in your eye, 

look as far away

as possible.

Marlene, age 68, New York

Macular degeneration is a leading cause 

of blindness. And smoking doubles your 

chances of getting it. That’s what happened 

to Marlene. To save her vision, she has 

to have eye injections every month. 

You can quit smoking.

CALL 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
No. 10-571.

#### Harold B. Rotte, Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.

562 U.S. 1110, 131 S. Ct. 835,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9643,

178 L. Ed. 2d 559,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 73.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Three-Five Systems,
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan

Jeffrey D. BuchananExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
 Date: March 15, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Three-Five
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bobby Hendricks, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 432]

Appeal from a judgment of Oneida County Court (Dwyer, J.), entered November 18, 1999, convicting defendant after a jury trial of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal *1451Law § 125.25 [3]) and two counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1], [2]). Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial when the prosecutor failed to correct the testimony of a witness that she had not received a benefit in exchange for her testimony. The People disclosed in their response to defendant’s discovery demand that “the People have agreed to grant favorable treatment to [the witness], on a criminal misdemeanor charge in exchange for information regarding this investigation.” At trial, the witness testified that she had received an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal on charges of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, but testified further that she had not received a benefit for the information she provided regarding the charges against defendant. The prosecutor should have corrected that testimony based on the People’s discovery response indicating that the adjournment in contemplation of dismissal had in fact been granted in exchange for the witness’s information *(see People v Novoa,*70 NY2d 490, 496-497 [1987]; *People v LaDolce,*196 AD2d 49, 56 [1994]). “[I]n the face of a prosecutor’s knowledge that a witnesses] testimony denying that a promise of leniency was given is false, he or she has no choice but to correct the misstatement and to elicit the truth” *(People v Piazza,*48 NY2d 151, 162-163 [1979], citing *People v Savvides,*1 NY2d 554, 557 [1956]). However, defendant failed to object or to seek sanctions when the witness testified differently from what was disclosed in the People’s discovery demand. Thus, the issue is not preserved for our review *(see People v Bryant,*298 AD2d 845, 846 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 556 [2002]). In any event, the error is harmless *(see People v Steadman,*82 NY2d 1, 8-9 [1993]).

We further conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in its *Sandoval*and *Ventimiglia*rulings *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203, 207-208 [2002]; *People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]). The evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction, and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Berroa,*99 NY2d 134, 139 [2002]), and the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for our review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Present—Pigott Jr., P.J, Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received requests from Mayer, 
Brown & Platt on behalf of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway 
Company (BNSF) (WB461-1--6/2/98), and from the General American 
Transportation Corporation (WB512-4--6/15/98) for permission to use 
certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of these 
requests may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental 
Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.8.

Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 565-1542.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17681 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
No. 10-621.

#### Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr., Petitioner v. Steve Gaenzle.

562 U.S. 1200, 131 S. Ct. 1045,

178 L. Ed. 2d 864,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1027.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*865Same case below, 614 F.3d 1213.