alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.24

                              PROMISSORY NOTE #___

$100,000.00                                             [#1 - OCTOBER 17, 2004]
                                                        [#2 - NOVEMBER 1, 2004]
                                                        [#3 - NOVEMBER 15, 2004]


       FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Viper Motorcycle Company ("Viper") hereby promises to
pay to the order of David  Palmlund  ("Palmlund"),  his heirs and  assigns,  the
principal sum of Ninety Thousand & No/100 Dollars ($90,000.00),  plus a loan fee
of Ten  Thousand  & No/100  Dollars  ($10,000.00),  for a total  of One  Hundred
Thousand & No/100 Dollars  ($100,000.00).  [Notes #2, #3 Only: Principal will be
funded as  follows:  $45,000.00  upon notice from AMEX for the Viper IPO and the
balance of $45,000.00 to be funded upon notice from the SEC for the Viper IPO.]

       The outstanding principal amount, along with the loan fee, as of the date
of this  agreement,  shall become due and payable on the earlier of an effective
Initial Public  Offering of Viper  Motorcycle  Company or December 31, 2005. All
payments shall be made payable to David Palmlund,  and shall be sent to his then
current address, which is presently at 5323 Swiss Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75214.

       Viper shall have the right to prepay this Note or any part thereof at any
time without penalty.

       Viper agrees to pay this Note and, in the event of default,  all costs of
collection, including reasonable attorney's fees.

Accepted By:

VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY


----------------------------------------
Name and Title


Accepted By:


----------------------------------------
David Palmlund
#### People v Katsafaros

3d Dept: 145 AD3d 1343 (Columbia)

denied 3/30/17 (Rivera, J.)
No. 10-7264.

#### Kenneth R. Roberts, Petitioner v. Steven Singer, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 930,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 216.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### Famoxado n e Response to Comments DP No. D427905 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D . C . 20460

MEMORANDUM Date : 

### August 3, 2015 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

SUBJECT: Famoxadone. 

### Response to Co mm ents on the Scoping Document in S upport of Registration Review. PC Code: 113202 DP Barcode: 0427905 Dec i s ion No.: 506171 Registration No.: NA Petition Nos.: NA Reg ula tory Action: Registration Review Risk Assess T ype : NA Case No.: NA TXRNo.: NA CAS Nos .: 1 3 1807-57-3 MRIDNo.: NA 

### F ROM:

THRU:



### TO: ldeliz Neg r6 n- Encamac i6 J n Che mi st

# ~~**,** Kate l ynn Kin g, Biologist ·**~** 

### ' Risk Assessment Branch Health Effects Division (7509P) Office of Pesticide Programs Michael Metzger, Branch

# Chiefμ**~** { Risk Assessment Branch V 

### Health Effects Division (7509P) [JJ 

### Office of P estic id e Programs Chr istin a Scheltema , Ri sk Manager Reviewer Nei l Anderso n , Bran ch Chief Pesticide Re-evaluation Di vision (7508 P ) Office of Pesticide Programs

Page 1 

### of 2Famoxadone Response to Comments DP No. 0427905 DuPont Crop Protec tion has submitted comments on the Heal th Effect's D ivision (HED) document titled Famoxadone. Human Health Assessment Scoping Documenl in Supporl of R eg is tration Review (03 1 041 20 15, 0423286). HED has considered DuPont 's comments (from their su bmi ssio n dated Marc h 2015, DuPont Protection Response C omments to: Famoxadone R eg istralion Review Initial Docket EPA-HQ-O P P-2015-0094 , Pages 3
- 4, and provides the following response. 1. GD LN 860.1340
- Livestock enforcement Metho d and Independent Laboratory Vali dat ion 

### DuPont R es pon se : New studies have been conducted and will be submitted if requested (An imal Tissue Method , DuPont-33688 and the ILV , DuPont-33687). 

### H E D Re s p o n se: Please , proceed to submit these studies . 2. GDLN 860. 1380
- Storag e Stab ili ty in Soil and Water 

### H E D Co mm ent: Thi s stud y seems to be part of the OPPTS 835 series for Fate , Transport and Transformation Test Guide li nes , 860.1380 refers to storage s tability in p lants and li vestock matrices . We defer to th e Enviro nm enta l Fate and Effects Di visio n with regards to this study. 3. GDLN 870. 3465
- 90-day Inhalation Tox ic ity - Rat 

### DuPont Res pon se : The additiona l study will be conducted if requested. 

### H E D Re s pon se : This study is a requ ireme nt for reg istration rev iew. 4. GDLN 875.2100
- Dislodgeable Foliar Residue 

### DuPont R es p o n se : There is a dislodgeable foliar residue study on tomato on file at the Agency (Du Po n t- 11 40 , MRT D 44946432). 

### H E D R es pon se : We w i l l p roceed to eva luate the tomato dislodgeab l e foliar study on file at the Agency. The require ment of a OFR study will be discussed upon evaluation of the tomato stu dy.

Page 2 of 2
# C_2013156EN.01005503.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/55

---

Action brought on 21 March 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-25/13)

2013/C 156/103

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decisions transferring pensions acquired before entry into service at the Commission on the basis of the Paymaster Office (PMO).

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the Appointing Authority on 11 December 2012, rejecting the claims made by the applicant on 16 August 2012 and 28 August 2012 against the decisions of the PMO.4 on 21 May 2012, 31 May 2012 and 2 July 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the Appointing Authority on 11 December 2012, rejecting the claims made by the applicant on 16 August 2012 and 28 August 2012 against the decisions of the PMO.4 on 21 May 2012, 31 May 2012 and 2 July 2012;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul in addition those decisions of 21 May 2012, 31 May 2012 and 2 July 2012 adopted by the PMO.4, against which the applicant’s claims were brought; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul in addition those decisions of 21 May 2012, 31 May 2012 and 2 July 2012 adopted by the PMO.4, against which the applicant’s claims were brought;

| — | Declare the general implementing provisions of Articles I1 and 12 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, pursuant to Article 277 of the EC Treaty of 25 March 1957, as adopted on 3 March 2011, unlawful and inapplicable to the present case, particularly Article 9 thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the general implementing provisions of Articles I1 and 12 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, pursuant to Article 277 of the EC Treaty of 25 March 1957, as adopted on 3 March 2011, unlawful and inapplicable to the present case, particularly Article 9 thereof;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings in accordance with Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure and the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the proceedings, in particular the cost of having an address for service, travel and subsistence expenses and lawyers’ fees in accordance with Article 91(b) of those Rules. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings in accordance with Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure and the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the proceedings, in particular the cost of having an address for service, travel and subsistence expenses and lawyers’ fees in accordance with Article 91(b) of those Rules.

---
HIV alone 

didn’t cause the 

clogged artery 

in my neck. 

Smoking with 

HIV did.

Brian, age 45, California

Brian had his HIV under control 

with medication. But smoking with 

HIV caused him to have serious 

health problems, including a 

stroke, a blood clot in his lungs 

and surgery on an artery in his 

neck. Smoking makes living with 

HIV much worse. You can quit.

CALL 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
# C_2015381EN.01000701.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów

(Case C-276/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 9(1) - Article 13(1) - Taxable persons - Interpretation of the word ‘independently’ - Municipal body - Economic activities carried out by an organisational entity of a municipality other than as a public authority - Whether such an entity may be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of the provisions of Directive 2006/112 - Articles 4(2) and 5(3) TEU))

(2015/C 381/07)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gmina Wrocław

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that bodies governed by public law, such as the municipal budgetary entities at issue in the main proceedings, cannot be regarded as taxable persons for the purposes of value added tax in so far as they do not satisfy the criterion of independence set out in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.B****CERTIFICATION**I, John R. Sult, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of El Paso Natural Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 3, 2006         */s/ John R. Sult*   John R. Sult   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
No. 10-412.

#### Vanderbilt University, Petitioner v. ICOS Corporation.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1043,

178 L. Ed. 2d 863,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 972.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 1297.
# C_2013108EN.01003301.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/33

---

Action brought on 18 February 2013 — Calestep v ECHA

(Case T-89/13)

2013/C 108/82

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Calestep, SL (Estepa, Espana) (represented by: E. Cabezos Mateos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should, applying all the steps of the procedure, uphold the application and annul the decision of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to which the application relates.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in the present proceedings, as a result of its classification as a small company, has been paying the reduced fee referred to in Article 74(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1), and in Commission Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 of 16 April 2008 on the fees and charges payable to the European Chemicals Agency (OJ 2008 L 107, p. 6), which in turn refer to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ 2003 L 124, p. 36).

Having made checks, the ECHA considered that the applicant cannot be considered to be a small company, as it is part of a group. Upon finding that that company did not fulfil the requirements, the defendant ordered the applicant to pay the balance of the full fee due for a medium-sized company, as well as an administrative charge.

In support of its action, the applicant invokes a single plea in law based on failure to comply with two of the requirements of Article 2(2) of the Annex to the above Recommendation.

It is suggested in that regard that in order to prevent a company from being considered a small company, it is not enough that that company has more than 50 employees; it is necessary also to show that one of the other requirements under that provision is satisfied, as the provision contains the conjunction ‘and’. This has not been done in the present case.

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.04 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.04 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.04 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.04 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation DLA Contracting Officer DSC Richmond CCO Summit
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 10-7261.

#### Kevin Antonio Williams, Petitioner v. John W. Haviland, Warden.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 929,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 543.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 397.
No. 10-6359.

#### Orville Wynter, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 988,

178 L. Ed. 2d 817,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 531.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 572, 178 L. Ed. 2d 419, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8723.
No. 09-10690.

#### Dillard J. Booker, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 980,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 104.

178 L. Ed. 2d 808,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 98, 178 L. Ed. 2d 62, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6453.
EXHIBIT 21.1     Subsidiaries of
the Company

Subsidiaries of Dynasil Corporation of America



|                                      | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Dynasil International, Inc (Inactive) | New Jersey                   
|Hibshman Corporation (Inactive)       | California                   
|Optometrics Corporation               | Delaware                     
|Evaporated Metal Films Corporation    | New York                     
|Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc.    | Delaware                     
|RMD Instruments Corporation           | Delaware                     
|Hilger Crystals, Ltd.                 | United Kingdom               
|Dynasil Biomedical Corporation        | Delaware                     
|Xcede Technologies, Inc.              | Delaware
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.99 MB)

Tags:historypage_director

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**

**CFO CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Jimmi Sue Smith, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EQT Corporation; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| April 29,   2019         |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/   Jimmi Sue Smith         |   |   |
| Jimmi   Sue Smith             |   |
| Principal   Financial Officer |   |
|                               |        |  |

 

92

----
# C_2015398EN.01002302.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 31 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Fazenda Pública v Beiragás — Companhia de Gás das Beiras SA

(Case C-423/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 398/30)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.

1

---