alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016222EN.01001202.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2016 — Mikhalchanka v Council

(Case T-693/13) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Belarus - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Restrictions on entry into, and transit through, the territory of the European Union - Retention of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Journalist - Rights of defence - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment))

(2016/C 222/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Aliaksei Mikhalchanka (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and F. Naert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2013 L 288, p. 69) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2013 L 288, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application of the Council of the European Union for a ruling that there is no need to adjudicate; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application of the Council of the European Union for a ruling that there is no need to adjudicate;

| 2. | Annuls, in so far as they concern Mr Aliaksei Mikhalchanka:






  — | Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Annuls, in so far as they concern Mr Aliaksei Mikhalchanka:

—

Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus;

| — | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus; |
| --- | --- |

—

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus;

| 3. | Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Mikhalchanka. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Mikhalchanka.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT G.M.K., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4970 ) M.S. and R.N.S., ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 31, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John S. Carlin, Judge. G.M.K., pro se. M.S. and R.N.S., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LaROSE, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer), certify (i) that the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John W. Somerhalder II
                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       March 27, 2003
DON’T WAIT FOR

OPEN HEART SURGERY

TO STOP SMOKING.

Mariano, Age 55

Illinois

Smoking can damage more than just your lungs.

Mariano needed open heart surgery to save his life. 

You can quit. For free help, call 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

#CDCTips
No. 09-8536.

#### Frankie Segarra, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1078, 131 S. Ct. 633,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9300.

178 L. Ed. 2d 509,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 1269.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-76697, 33-1805, 33-22289, 33-50248, 33-74488,
333-62933, 333-81955, 333-32872 and 333-56120) of Quixote Corporation and the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 2-96502 and 33-14873) of Quixote
Corporation of our report dated August 7, 2000, except as to the Industry
Segment Information note, which is as of February 23, 2001, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2001


                                       28
# C_2013367EN.01003601.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/36

---

Action brought on 15 October 2013 — Radecki v OHIM — Vamed (AKTIVAMED)

(Case T-551/13)

2013/C 367/64

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michael Radecki (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vamed AG (Vienna, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 July 2013 (Case R 365/2012-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 July 2013 (Case R 365/2012-1);

| — | order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Michael Radecki

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘AKTIVAMED’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 11 and 44 — Community trade mark No 8 958 886

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Vamed AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Austrian figurative marks and international registration ‘VAMED’ for goods and services in Classes 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 20, 21, 28, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition dismissed

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Decision of the Opposition Division annulled

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# Troop Support hosts ‘intersection’ of clothing and textiles industry, customers 

/ Published June 30, 2015
Cherry Hill, New Jersey,
# Commander to summer hires: you directly impact warfighter

/ Published July 28, 2016
Philadelphia, 

Students in the Workforce Recruitment Program make a direct impact on the troops they support, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander told the summer hires July 20.

“What you do has a direct impact on the warfighter every day,” said Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton. "They (workforce) do it because they know that at the other end of that transaction they put into the computer is a soldier, sailor, airmen or Marine that needs some type of equipment that potentially could save their life.”

Eighteen students in the Workforce Recruitment Program had the chance to talk with Hamilton and ask questions during a meet and greet.

“This is one of the biggest group of students we have ever had,” said June Goldberg, a DLA Troop Support equal opportunity specialist Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity office.

The WRP is a recruitment and referral program that connects federal and private sector employers with college students and recent graduates with disabilities.

The 14-week program is managed by theDepartment of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy and the Department of Defense’s Office of Diversity Management.

Hamilton started by sharing his college background and stories of his 30-year career in the Army. 

Hamilton also opened the meeting for students to ask questions. Many asked about his career, family, difficulties in life and what college degrees would benefit them at Troop Support.

Hamilton was asked if he requested to work for “When you get promoted to general, you don’t get any say in where you go,” he said. “But it was my number one choice, inside, that I never told anyone.”

WRP students are able to apply for or convert into either the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program or intern program.

“(The WRP program) has grown incredibly because the success stories have a strong ripple effect throughout supervisors and managers,”said Michael Cowley, equal opportunity specialist. “Our goal is to convert as many of those students who have already graduated into the PaCE program.”

Several students said they enjoy working at DLA Troop Support and hope to make it a career.

“I love working at the Defense Logistics Agency and I want to pursue full employment here,” said Samuel Marcus, a WRP student and senior at Temple University. “I am looking forward to other opportunities DLA has to offer.”

Students in the program representedvarious majors from Rutgers University, Pennsylvania State University, Temple University, Southern New Hampshire University, Ohio State, Saint Joseph's University, University of Delaware and Chestnut Hill College.

For more WRP information, contact Cowley at (215) 737-5906 or visit the WRP website.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-343-004]


Sea Robin Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Waiver

June 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 17, 1998, Sea Robin Pipeline Company (Sea 
Robin) filed a petition for an interim waiver of the Section 5.10 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff to extend the date on 
which it implements pooling service on its system to the date the SoNet 
Premier System is implemented. Such implementation date is expected to 
be on or before September 1, 1998.
    Sea Robin states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of the shippers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 29, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17036 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 21

QUIXOTE CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY  as of June 30, 2001

|QUIXOTE CORPORATION (PARENT)        |                                 | Jurisdiction
Under Which
Organized                       
|----------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc. |                                 | Delaware                                                 
|                                    | TranSafe Corporation            |                                                          
|                                    |                                 | Nu-Metrics, Inc.                                         
|                                    |                                 | Highway Information Systems, Inc.                        
|                                    |                                 |                                                          
|                                    | National Signal, Inc.           |                                                          
|                                    | Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. |                                                          
|                                    |                                 | E-Tech Testing Services, Inc.                            
|                                    |                                 | Safe-Hit Corporation                                     
|                                    |                                 | Spin-Cast Plastics, Inc.                                 
|                                    |                                 | Energy Absorption Systems (Europe), Inc.                 
|                                    |                                 | Quixote Transportation Systems (Asia Pacific) Pty Limited
|                                    |                                 | Quixote Transportation Systems (Europe), Inc.            
|Quixote Research Corporation        |                                 | Delaware                                                 
|Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation   |                                 | U.S. Virgin Islands                                      

Quixote
Transportation Safety, Inc., Quixote Research Corporation and Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation are wholly-owned by Quixote Corporation.

TranSafe
Corporation, National Signal, Inc. and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. are wholly-owned by Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

All
subsidiaries listed under TranSafe Corporation, Highway Information Systems, Inc. and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. are wholly-owned by those corporations.

---

QuickLinks
No. 10-171.

#### Laura Gonzalez-Vera, et al., Petitioners v. Michael Vernon Townley, et al.

562 U.S. 896, 131 S. Ct. 337,

178 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6140.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 U.S. App. D.C. 222, 595 F.3d 379.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 98-13790) published on pages 
28385-28386 of the issue for Friday, May 22, 1998.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond heading, the entry for 
NationsBank Corporation and NationsBank (DE) Corporation, both in 
Charlotte, North Carolina (collectively NationsBank), is revised to 
read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. NationsBank Corporation and NationsBank (DE) Corporation, both 
in Charlotte, North Carolina (collectively, NationsBank); to merge with 
BankAmerica Corporation, San Francisco, California (BankAmerica), and 
thereby acquire the following bank subsidiaries of BankAmerica: Bank of 
America National Trust and Savings Association, San Francisco, 
California; Bank of America Texas, National Association, Dallas, Texas; 
Bank of America National Association, Phoenix, Arizona; and Bank of 
America Community Development Bank, Walnut Creek, California. On 
consummation of the proposed transaction, NationsBank would be renamed 
BankAmerica Corporation. NationsBank may form one or more intermediate 
bank holding companies.
    In connection with the proposed transaction, NationsBank has 
provided notice to acquire all of the nonbank subsidiaries of 
BankAmerica and to engage, directly or indirectly through such nonbank 
subsidiaries, in a variety of nonbanking activities that previously 
have been determined to be permissible for bank holding companies. 
NationsBank also would continue to control all of its existing bank and 
nonbank subsidiaries.
    The comment period on this application has been extended. Comments 
on this application must be received by July 9, 1998.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 24, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17253 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 10-7500.

#### Gerald Thomas Having, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1117, 131 S. Ct. 844,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9764.

178 L. Ed. 2d 573,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week celebrated on Defense Supply Center Richmond

/ Published April 15, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week is held every year during the second week of April to honor telecommunications personnel for their commitment, service and sacrifice. This year, it is celebrated April 10-16.

Patricia Anderson of the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office in California initially started NPSTW in 1981. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed Presidential Proclamation 6667, declaring the second week of April as NPSTW. This week is a time to celebrate and thank telecommunications personnel across the nation who serve our communities, citizens and public safety personnel 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

In recognition of NPSTW, Bruce Thomas, staff director, DLA Installation Management’s Security and Emergency Services, said DLA will once again join the nation in recognizing our dedicated dispatchers who provide critical emergency and non-emergency support each year to the DLA warfighter support mission.

On Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Deborah Foster is responsible for ensuring the Emergency Communication Center runs smoothly and efficiently. Foster, a contracted employee within DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Emergency Services, is the program manager overseeing the ECC contract.

Foster brought a wealth of emergency services experience to the table when she was hired back in June  2021. She had previously worked as a 9-1-1 supervisor with James City County, Virginia, for more than 27-years retiring two weeks before coming to DSCR.

Don Bartlett is the security operations chief for DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Security and Emergency Services. He believes Foster’s hard work and dedication make her the idea person for the job.

“Since joining the ECC team, Mrs. Foster has overcome tremendous adversity while managing positive changes within the ECC. She embodies the work ethic, team mentality and perseverance that DLA employees should strive to achieve,” he said.

Foster said overcoming those adversities included asking her people to work a good deal of overtime hours and losing her lead dispatcher and other staff members.

Despite these obstacles, Foster said she doesn’t regret her decision to take on the responsibility of running the ECC.

“Everyone within the public safety building has been great. They are the ones who get me through the hard days because I know I have the support,” she said.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, Melissa Van Valkenburgh, Chief Financial Officer of ECC
International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to her knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 of the Company
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                   
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Melissa Van Valkenburgh                                       
| |  |                                                                   
| |  | Melissa Van Valkenburgh
Chief Financial Officer
September 27, 2002

Page 51 of 54
No. 10-6315.

#### LaVern Berryhill, Petitioner v. Brad Henry, Governor of Oklahoma, et al.

562 U.S. 1132, 131 S. Ct. 975,

178 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 184.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 10-6777.

#### Michael William Gabbard, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 547,

178 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8351.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 319.
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 18.1

The Elder-Beerman Stores Corporation
3155 El-Bee Road
Dayton, Ohio 45439

Dear Sirs:

     We have audited the financial statements of The Elder-Beerman Stores
Corporation as of February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002, and for each of the
three years in the period ended February 1, 2003, included in your Annual Report
on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our
report thereon dated March 20, 2003, which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the Company's method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 and a change in the Company's method of accounting
for unrecognized actuarial gains and losses related to pension benefits. Note H
to such financial statements contains a description of your adoption during the
year ended February 1, 2003 of the change in accounting method of amortizing
unrecognized actuarial gains and losses related to pension benefits from the
minimum amortization method to a method whereby the Company recognizes any
actuarial gains or losses immediately into income or expense. In our judgment,
such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under
the circumstances.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dayton, Ohio
March 20, 2003