alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Parts 19, 24, 111, 113, 143, 162, 163, 178, and 181

(T.D. 98-56)
RIN 1515-AB77


Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: Customs Service; Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to the document published in 
the Federal Register which set forth final amendments to the Customs 
Regulations to reflect changes to the Customs laws regarding 
recordkeeping and related requirements. The correction involves an 
incorrect citation within Sec. 163.6 of the final regulatory texts.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective July 16, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis W. Foote, Regulations Branch, 
Office of Regulations and Rulings (202-927-0163).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 16, 1998, Customs published in the Federal Register (63 FR 
32916) as T.D. 98-56 a final rule document setting forth final 
amendments to the Customs Regulations to reflect changes to the Customs 
laws regarding recordkeeping requirements, examination of records and 
witnesses, regulatory audit procedures, and judicial enforcement 
contained in the Customs Modernization provisions of the North American 
Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182, 107 Stat. 
2057). The majority of those final regulatory texts are contained in 
new part 163 (19 CFR part 163) which reflects general recordkeeping 
requirements applicable to persons who engage in specified types of 
customs transactions.
    Within new part 163, Sec. 163.6 includes requirements concerning 
the production and examination of entry records and prescribes the 
monetary penalty assessment and additional actions that Customs may 
take for a failure to comply with those requirements. Within 
Sec. 163.6, paragraph (b)(2)(i) specifies the additional actions that 
Customs may take and paragraph (b)(2)(ii) sets forth an exception to 
the paragraph (b)(2)(i) general rule. However, the text of paragraph 
(b)(2)(ii), as published, improperly included a reference to paragraph 
``(b)(2)(ii)(B)'' which should have read ``(b)(2)(i)(B)''. This 
document corrects this typographical error.

Correction to the Final Regulations


Sec. 163.6  [Corrected]

    On page 32948, in the third column, in Sec. 163.6, in paragraph 
(b)(2)(ii), the reference ``(b)(2)(ii)(B)'' is corrected to read 
``(b)(2)(i)(B)''.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Harold M. Singer,
Chief, Regulations Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-17060 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
No. 10-7613.

#### Lal Bhatia, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1170, 131 S. Ct. 953,

178 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 28.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Jus*806tice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-6120.

#### Donald Winnett, Petitioner v. Saline County Jail, et al.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 987,

178 L. Ed. 2d 816,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 175.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 986, 131 S. Ct. 424, 178 L. Ed. 2d 331, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8136.
# International Passenger Facilitation



# Issues

Advisory Committee on Aviation Consumer

Protection

Presenter : Matthew J. Cornelius

, Managing

Director, Air Policy Airports Council International

– North America

December 16, 2013 Washington, D.C.

1

# Agenda

Background on the Issue

Formation of Airport/Airline Coalition



# Goals and Progress

www.aci

- na.org 2

# Issue Background

Statement of the Issues:

Persistent and excessive wait times at key international gateway airports need to be reduced to achieve the President’s goal of increasing travel and tourism Airports/Airlines need access to transparent data on passenger wait times in order to evaluate where and the extent to which excessive waits exist

ACI

- NA/A4A/IATA are working collaboratively with CBP on short, medium, and long term solutions
Collaborative efforts have been well

- received by CBP and progress is being made

3

# Airport/Airline Coalition: Short

- Term 

# Goals
Improve transparency of wait

- time data Share timely data with airlines and airports
Amend CBP reporting formats to include threshold periods above 60 minutes (i.e. 120 minutes; and 80 minutes Progress: New Automated Wait Times (AWT) website running 

### Place automated kiosks inside primary inspection Progress: APC Kiosks deployed at YVR, YYZ, YUL, ORD, JFK (T4), DFW, MIA Next Steps : SEA and other airports; Mobile solutions? 

### Treat administrative tasks differently

– use non

- law enforcement employees or staff only off

- peak Progress: None Next Steps: Continue advocacy

4

# Airport/Airline Coalition: Short

- Term 

# Goals 2

Don’t expand preclearance Progress : Abu Dhabi preclearance under development



### Expand Global Entry for US citizens Progress: Over 1 Million registered for Global Entry Next Steps: Increase usage and eligibility for non

- U.S. citizens



### Increase flexibility and operational agility Progress: CBP targeted primary inspection wait times this summer Moved resources to prevent problems Next Steps: Improve funding and preserve budgetary flexibility

5

# Airport/Airline Coalition: Medium

- term 

# Goals

Expand non

- citizen participation in Global Entry Progress: New fully

- reciprocal agreements



### Transparent allocation of resources Progress: Preliminary Workload Staffing Model (WSM) revealed Next Steps: Determine Port

- level details on allocation of staff and tasks


### Appropriate level of funding from Congress Progress: FY14 funding still unclear, FY15 budget process beginning

6

# Airport/Airline Coalition: Long

- Term 

# Goals

Cost

- based user

- fee study



### Multiple options for primary inspection

Larger share of trusted travelers

Future facility design reflecting new processes

7

# Questions?

For comments or questions, please contact:

Debby McElroy

ACI

- NA
Phone: 202

- 293

- 8500 Email: dmcelroy@aci

- na.org

Sharon Pinkerton

A4A
Phone: 202

- 626

- 4000 Email: spinkerton@airlines.org

www.aci

- na.org 8
# C_2015381EN.01002701.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/27

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2015 — Calestep v ECHA

(Case T-89/13) (1)

1

((REACH - Fee due for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - Error in the declaration of the size of the undertaking - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law))

(2015/C 381/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Calestep, SL (Estepa, Spain) (represented by: E. Cabezas Mateos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, A. Iber and C. Schultheiss, acting as Agents, and C. Garcia Molyneux, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of ECHA Decision SME (2012) 4028 of 21 December 2012, finding that the applicant does not satisfy the conditions to benefit from the reduced fees for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Calestep, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calestep, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JER R Y HOANG, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. B ANK OF AM E R IC A, N.A., a ll boa rd of dire c tors, offic e rs a

nd unknown owners, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-35799 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-01013-JC C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington John C . C o u ghe nour, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : FER

NANDEZ, SILVER

M AN, a nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Je rry Hoa n g a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his quie t titlea c tion. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a distric t c ourt’ s dismissa l for fa i lure to sta t e a c la im unde r Fe de ra l R

ule of 

# FIL ED MAR 04 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C ivil Proc e dure 12(b)(6). He bbev . Plile r , 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th C ir. 2010). W e

a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d Hoa

ng’ s a c tion be c a

use Hoa ng fa ile d to a l le ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to sta te any c la im for re lie f. Se e De utsc heBank N at’l Trust C o. v . Slotk e , — P.3d —

, 2016 WL 107783, a

t *5 (W a sh. C t. App. Ja

n. 11, 2016) (holding truste e for a m ortga ge ba c ke d se c urity into whic h pla intiff’ s loa n ha d be e n tra

n sfe rre d ha d a

uthority to c om m e nc e fore c losure proc e e dings a nd tha t pla i ntiff la c ke d sta

nding to c ha lle nge the va lidity of the a s signm e nt into the trust); W alk e r v . Quality

Loan Se rv ic eC

orp. , 308 P.3d 716, 728 (Wa sh. C t. App. 2013) (re je c t ing theargum e nt tha

t the nam ing of M ortga ge Ele c t ronic R e g istra

tion Sy ste m s , Inc . a s be n e fic ia ry re nde rs a de e d of trust void). The distric t c ourt prope rly de nie d Hoa

ng’ s m otion to re m and be c a use it ha d subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1332. Se e 28 U.S.C . § 1332(a) (se tting forth re quire m e nts for dive rsity jurisdic tion). W e do not c onside r Hoa

ng’ s a rgum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e in his reply brie f. Se e Smith v . Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th C ir. 1999) (“ [A] rgum e nts not ra ise d by a

pa rty in its opening brie f are de e m e d wa ive d.” ). AFFIRM E D .

1 3 - 3 5 7 9 9 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Petitioner

,

v.

MICHAEL BARNES
, Respondent

.

No. 4D 17

- 3607

[ December 19, 2018 ]

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; William W. Haury , Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 010380

- CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for petitioner

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for respondent

.

P ER C URIAM

.

The s tate appeals the circuit court’s order granting a criminal defendant’s motion to vacate a plea. Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1), an order granting a defendant’s m otion to vacate a plea is not among the orders that the s tate may appeal. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See State v. Pettis , 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988 ); State v. Stapleton , 764 So. 2d 886, 887 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2000). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari for failure to show a departure from the essential requirements of the law resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case.

G ROSS

, M AY
, JJ., and C ARACUZZO

, C HERYL , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L.
HAUSER                                                         
|David L. Hauser Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2004
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2992 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2019 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

8 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2992 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

3 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

4 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree5 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

6 ‘‘(A) section 8(a)(1) or 8(a)(5), or 

7 ‘‘(B) a collective bargaining contract or agree8 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en9 actment of the RAISE Act, 

10 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

11 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

12 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em13 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

and

VRG LINHAS AEREAS S.A. d/b/a GOL

(U.S.

- Brazil Codesharing) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0095

30 DAY NOTICE OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

AND VRG LINHAS AEREAS S.A. d/b/a GOL

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Felipe Amadeu Lotufo

Contracts and Corporate Lawyer

Legal Department

VRG Linhas Aereas S.A.

— Grupo Gol

Praca Co mandante Lineu Gomes, s/n, portaria 03

Jardim Aeroporto Sao Paulo/SP

– CEP 04626

- 020

November 8 , 201 2 Alexander Van der Bellen,

Managing Director, Government Affairs

and Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1212 New York Avenue, NW Suite 200

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 842

- 4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.comBEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

and

VRG LINHAS AEREAS S.A. d/b/a GOL

(U.S.

- Brazil Codesharing) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0095

30 DAY NOTICE OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

AND VRG LINHAS AEREAS S.A. d/b/a GOL

Pursuant to the statement of authorization granted to VRG Linhas Aereas S.A.

d/b/a Gol (“Gol” ), 1 Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”), and Gol hereby notify the Department

that, on or after 30 days from today, Delta plans to introduce additional DL* codesharing

on Gol

- operated flights to the points listed in Attachment A

.

Respectfully submitted,

/

s/ Felipe Amadeu Lotufo

__________________________ Felipe Amadeu Lotufo

Contracts and Corporate Lawyer

Legal Department

VRG Linhas Aereas S.A.

— Grupo Gol ___________________ Alexander Van der Bellen,

Managing Director, Government Affairs

and Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1 NOAT May 11, 2010; NOAT April 19, 2011 in DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0095.Attachment A

(1) Delta DL* code on Gol

- operated flights beyond Delta’s Brazil gateways :

A. Points in Brazil

Aracaju

Bauru

Boa Vista

Campinas

Campina Grande

Campo Grande

Caxias do Sul

Chapeco

Cr uzeiro do Sul Acre

Fernando de Noronha

Ilheus

Imperatriz

Joinville

Juazeiro do Norte

Macapa Amapa

Maceio Alagoas

Maraba

Maringa

Montes Claros

Palmas To

Petrolina

Porto Seguro

Porto Velho

Pres Prudente

Rio Branco

Rio de Janeiro

San Luiz M aranhao

Santarem

Sao Paulo

Uberlandia

B. Beyond Points in Third Countries

Buenos Aires

, Argentina

Curacao

, Curacao

Punta Cana

, Dominican Republic

Rosario

, Argentina

Santa Cruz

- Viru Viru

, Bolivia

Santiago

, ChileCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 8 th day of November , 201 2

, upon the following persons via email:

francis.heil @aa.com

robert.wirick @aa.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

dan.weiss@united .com

steve.morrissey @united.com

esta. rosenberg@dot.gov

george.wellington@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

urskr@state.gov

info@airlineinfo.com
**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, William L. Stephens, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the
consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
> information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
> prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
> disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
> that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
> registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
> reporting

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/  William L. StephensWilliam L. Stephens
President and Chief Executive Officer