alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2735 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2735

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence-related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2019

Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Sensenbrenner) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence-related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligence Budget Transparency Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH ELEMENT OF THE 
              GOVERNMENT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in the budget 
        for intelligence or intelligence-related activities of each 
        element of the Government engaged in such activities in the 
        fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the estimated 
        appropriation required for each of the ensuing four fiscal 
        years; and
            ``(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term `element of the 
        Government' refers to each element of the intelligence 
        community as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security 
        Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).''.
                                 <all>
```
## In the United States Court of Appeals

For the Fifth Circuit

_______________



### m 01-21256

_______________



### R ICHARD 

### M. C OAN 

### , AS T RUSTEE FOR A RO C HEM I NTERNATIONAL , I NC ., AND A RO C HEM C ORPORATION , 

### Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS



### C HASE 

### M ANHATTAN 

### B ANK 

### , N.A., ET AL 

### ., Defendants,



### E RNST 

### & Y OUNG 

### , Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas


### m H-94-CV-3930

_________________________ December 10, 20022

Before S MITH , B ARKSDALE , and E MILIO M. G ARZA , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM : *

The pl aintiff sued Ernst & Young for breach of contract, the statute of limitations having expired on an action for professional malpractice. The district court granted summary judgment, finding no issues of material fact.

We have read the briefs and have heard the arguments of counsel, and have consulted pertinent port io ns of the record. The summary judgment record does not reflect actual knowledge on the part of Ernst & Young. On the basis of applicable caselaw and the summary judgment record, we affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
No. 10-6773.

#### Carolyn Urgent, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1182, 131 S. Ct. 999,

178 L. Ed. 2d 833,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 728.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*834Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 100.
# C_2013260EN.01003003.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma (Italy) lodged on 1 July 2013 — Pier Paolo Fabretti v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-367/13)

2013/C 260/56

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pier Paolo Fabretti

Applicant:

Defendants: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Roma — Ufficio Controlli

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it incompatible with Article 49 of the EC Treaty for persons resident in Italy to be required to declare for tax purposes, and be liable for tax on, winnings obtained from casinos in Member States of the European Union, as provided for by Article 67(1)(d) of Presidential Decree No 917 of 22.12.1986 (‘the TUIR’), or must this be regarded as justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health, pursuant to Article 46 of the EC Treaty?

---
No. 10-7098.

#### Michael Castillo, Petitioner v. Connecticut.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 803,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9505.

178 L. Ed. 2d 537,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 121 Conn. App. 699, 998 A.2d 177.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Stephen Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(i)  the
      Quarterly Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(ii)  information
      contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges Holding
      Corp.





Dated:
                November 19, 2007
            
            /s/Stephen
                SchwartzStephen
                Schwartz
              Chief
                Financial Officer
# C_2015398EN.01000301.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Firma Ernst Kollmer Fleischimport und -export v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-59/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Article 1(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) - Recovery of an export refund - Limitation period - Date from which time runs (dies a quo) - Act or omission by the economic operator - Occurrence of the prejudice - Continuous infringement - Single infringement))

(2015/C 398/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Firma Ernst Kollmer Fleischimport und -export

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 1(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings where the infringement of a provision of EU law was discovered only after the occurrence of the prejudice, the limitation period begins to run from the time when both the economic operator’s act or omission that infringed EU law and the prejudice caused to the budget of the European Union or budgets managed by it have occurred. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 1(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings where the infringement of a provision of EU law was discovered only after the occurrence of the prejudice, the limitation period begins to run from the time when both the economic operator’s act or omission that infringed EU law and the prejudice caused to the budget of the European Union or budgets managed by it have occurred.

| 2. | Article 1(2) of Regulation No 2988/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, a prejudice occurs as soon as the decision made to grant the export refund to the exporter concerned has been made. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 1(2) of Regulation No 2988/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, a prejudice occurs as soon as the decision made to grant the export refund to the exporter concerned has been made.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
# Rev C

# Rev B

# Rev A

# BASELINE
Exhibit
10.3


DISCRETIONARY
CREDIT DEMAND NOTE


 


	
  $250,000

  	
   

  	
  Minneapolis,
  Minnesota

  April 16, 2004

  



 


                FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, MEDICAL CV, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the “Borrower”)
promises to pay ON DEMAND to the
order of PKM PROPERTIES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Lender”)
at its office in Minneapolis, Minnesota or at such other place as may be
designated from time to time by the holder hereof, in lawful money of the
United States of America, the principal sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($250,000) or so much thereof as has been advanced by the Lender to or
for the benefit of the Borrower pursuant to that certain April 2004
Discretionary Credit Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2004, as amended from
time to time, between the Borrower and the Lender (the “Agreement”) and
remains unpaid, together with interest on the unpaid principal balance hereof
from the date hereof until this Note is fully paid, at an annual rate of
interest, calculated on the basis of actual number of days elapsed in a 360 day
year, that shall at all times be equal to the Interest Rate, as provided in the
Agreement, each change in the interest rate herein to become effective on the
day the corresponding change in the Interest Rate becomes effective.


 


ALL SUMS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE ARE DUE AND PAYABLE IMMEDIATELY
UPON DEMAND.  Until a demand
is made, this Note is payable as follows:  
the principal of this Note and all accrued interest shall be due and
payable on or before May 26, 2004. 
Payments hereunder shall be applied first to the payment of accrued
interest and then to the reduction of principal.  The Borrower may prepay at any time and from
time to time, all or any portion of the balance from time to time remaining on
this Note, without penalty or premium.


 


                This
Note is secured by the May Security Agreement referred to in the Agreement, and
is issued pursuant to and is subject to the Agreement.


 


                The
Borrower agrees to pay all costs of collection, including attorneys’ fees, in
the event this Note is not paid when due. 
This Note is being delivered in, and shall be governed by, the laws of
the State of Minnesota.  Presentment or
other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are expressly waived.


 


	
  .

  	
   

  	
  MEDICAL CV, INC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Blair P. Mowery

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
   

  	
  President
No. 10-6326.

#### Joseph Morales, Petitioner v. Shirlee Harry, Warden.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 859,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 693.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 530, 178 L. Ed. 2d 390, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8474.
**DAAN-17-01**

**Quantity Option**

(June 2017)

A quantity option of 100% is included in accordance with FAR Clause 52.217-7, Option for Increased Quantity – Separately Priced Line Item.

The quantity option may be exercised in one or more increments from time of award of the basic contract through date specified in clause 52.217-7.  The total quantity of supplies ordered under this option will not exceed the maximum specified in the Schedule for the applicable Option line item but may be less than the maximum quantity.  A modification issued by the Contracting Officer in accordance with clause 52.217-7 shall constitute an exercise of the option.

(End of Notice)
DESPUÉS DE QUE LE 

QUITEN UN PULMÓN, 

EVITE RESPIRAR

PROFUNDAMENTE.

Annette, 57 años, Diagnosticada a los 52 años 

Nueva York

Fumar le causa daño inmediato a su cuerpo.

A Annette, le causó cáncer de pulmón.

Usted puede dejar de fumar. Para ayuda

gratuita, llame al 1-855-DÉJELO-YA
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Data Schedule - Able Energy Inc. and Subsidiaries


     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
interim financial statements for the six month period ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         2,267
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  2,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   (158)
<INVENTORY>                                                    304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               4,992
<PP&E>                                                         6,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (1,488)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 10,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          3,275
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                                     6,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   10,995
<SALES>                                                        15,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               15,967
<CGS>                                                          13,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  2,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                596
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            342
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                133
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   475
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .17



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21


                       QUIXOTE CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                               as of June 30, 1996



                                                          Jurisdiction
                                                           Under Which
QUIXOTE CORPORATION (PARENT)                                Organized
----------------------------                              -------------

Disc Manufacturing, Inc.                                  Delaware

Energy Absorption Systems, Inc.                           Delaware
 Composite Components, Inc.                               Delaware
 E-Tech Testing Services, Inc.                            Delaware
 Safe-Hit Corporation                                     Nevada
 Spin-Cast Plastics, Inc.                                 Indiana

LaserVideo Acquisition Corporation                        Delaware

Legal Technologies, Inc.                                  Delaware
 Litigation Communications, Inc.                          Delaware
 Quixote Steno Corporation                                Delaware
  Quixote DPI Corporation                                 Delaware
   Court Technologies, Inc.                               Delaware
  Quixote IIS Corporation                                 Delaware
  Quixote Limited                                         United Kingdom
  Quixote LSI Corporation                                 Delaware

Myriad Entertainment, Inc.                                Delaware

QualAir Corporation                                       Delaware

Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation                         U.S. Virgin Islands

Quixote Research Corporation                              Delaware

All of the subsidiaries listed above are wholly-owned by Quixote except as
follows:

    Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. is the sole shareholder of Composite
    Components, Inc., E-Tech Testing Services, Inc., Safe-Hit Corporation and
    Spin-Cast Plastics, Inc.
    
    Legal Technologies, Inc. is the sole shareholder of Litigation
    Communications, Inc. and Quixote Steno Corporation.
    
    Quixote Steno Corporation is the sole shareholder of Quixote DPI
    Corporation, Quixote IIS Corporation, Quixote Limited and Quixote LSI
    Corporation.
    
    Quixote DPI Corporation is the sole shareholder of Court Technologies, Inc.
    
    The Company owns all of the preferred stock of LaserVideo Acquisition
    Corporation (LVAC) and shares voting power with respect to the outstanding
    common stock.  The preferred stock has voting rights and represents 50% of
    the voting stock of LVAC.
    
                                        - 49 -
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
COMMERCIAL LOAN AGREEMENT

	This Fifth Amendment to the Commercial Loan Agreement ("Amendment") is
entered into as of this 18th day of October, 1996 by and between SUMITOMO BANK
OF CALIFORNIA ("Bank") and THE TITAN CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
("Borrower"), with reference to the following:

RECITALS

A.	Borrower and Bank entered into that certain Commercial Loan Agreement
("Agreement") dated August 8, 1994 and subsequently amended on May 25, 1995
and December 29, 1995, May 9, 1996, and September 6, 1996 (collectively, the
"Agreement").

B.	Borrower and Bank desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and
conditions set forth herein.

AMENDMENT

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Borrower and Bank agree as follows:

	1.	Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the
Agreement.

	2.	Amendments.  This Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

		A. 6.11 Dividends/Distributions.  Section 6.11 of the Agreement is
hereby amended and replaced with the following:

"6.11 Dividends/Distributions.  Not to declare or pay any cash
dividends or cash distributions on any of its shares of capital
stock, except up to $875,000 in a specific fiscal year on its
preferred stock.


"BORROWER"                                                     "BANK"
THE TITAN CORPORATION                             SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA

BY___/s/ Bernard M. Hirl_                      BY__/s/ David W. Shaw__________
Bernard M. Hirl, Sr. VP/CFO                       David W. Shaw, V.P.
(Printed Name and Title)                           (Printed Name and Title)
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiger Telematics,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial officer of the Company
hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge and belief: 1) the
Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/S/ Michael W. Carrender
------------------------
Michael W. Carrender,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

May 18, 2005
No. 10-5764.

#### Leslie Dawn Eagle, Petitioner v. Yerington Paiute Tribe.

562 U.S. 1202, 131 S. Ct. 1042,

178 L. Ed. 2d 867,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 920.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 1161.
# C_2013325EN.01003902.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/39

---

Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-442/13)

2013/C 325/65

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hafez Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-359/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p.25.

1

---