alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

 

In our capacities as Presidentand Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofStressgen Biotechnologies Corporation (the “Company”) we hereby certify basedon our respective knowledge that: (a) the enclosed Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Quarterly Report.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel  L. Korpolinski                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L. Korpolinski                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                       |
| /s/ Donald  D. Tartre                      |   |
| Donald D. Tartre                           |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
 OF MOSINEE PAPER CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
 SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
 </LEGEND>
        
 <S>                                                    <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
 <PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1996
 <CASH>                                                   2,014,724
 <SECURITIES>                                                     0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                           30,203,091
 <ALLOWANCES>                                             3,384,318
 <INVENTORY>                                             39,051,518
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        72,252,186
 <PP&E>                                                 367,957,978
 <DEPRECIATION>                                         169,046,924
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         281,158,603
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   41,836,210
 <BONDS>                                                 60,248,943
 <COMMON>                                                58,678,056
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
 <PREFERRED>                                                      0
 <OTHER-SE>                                              79,118,843
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           281,158,603
 <SALES>                                                237,130,289
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       237,130,289
 <CGS>                                                  173,444,838
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          199,230,586
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (142,936)
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       3,512,211
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                         34,530,428
 <INCOME-TAX>                                            13,950,000
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     20,580,428
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
 <CHANGES>                                                        0
 <NET-INCOME>                                            20,580,428
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 1.96
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
         
 
</TABLE>
No. 09-9905.

#### Gary Alexander Matthews, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1174, 131 S. Ct. 991,

178 L. Ed. 2d 820,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 595.

January 10, 2011.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2420, 176 L. Ed. 2d 935, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3864.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      November 9, 2009
                /s/
      Mark T. FrostName:
      Mark T. FrostTitle: Senior Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
                  Treasurer
SUPREME COURT — SPECIAL TERM — WASHINGTON COUNTY.

January, 1924.

#### PEOPLE EX REL. CHARLES ACKRON v. WILLIAM HUNT, WARDEN.

(122 Misc. 247.)

Habeas corpus — Discretionary power op parole board to revoke parole — Writ dismissed.

The exercise of the discretionary power vested in the parole board to revoke a prisoner’s parole cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus.

Habeas cobpus.

*Carl*Sherman, *Attorney-General (Harry P. Kehoe, Deputy*Attorney-General, of counsel), for respondent.

Angell, J.:

Relator seeks to review by writ of habeas corpus the action of the parole board revoking his parole. Section 215 of the Prison Law of this state provides that if the board of parole *“*shall have reasonable cause to believe that the prisoner so on parole has violated his parole and has lapsed or is probably about to lapse into criminal ways and company,” the prisoner may be retaken. It thus clearly appears that the question of whether a prisoner’s parole should be revoked is one solely within the discretionary powers of the parole board. The discretion thus vested by statute in the board of parole cannot be reviewed by a writ of habeas corpus. This would necessarily seem to be true even if there were no authority upon the question. However, in People ex rel. Kane v. Hanley, 116 Misc. Rep. 624, where in a similar case the relator sought to avoid being taken into custody under a warrant for his *139arrest issued by the parole commission for a breach of parole, Justice Lydon said: “ This power of recommitment, however, has been held constitutional (People v. Madden, 120 App. Div. 338), and no provision has been made in the statute creating the commission for reviewing its action in revoking a parole for the prisoner’s breach of conditions upon which the parole was granted. * * * I am of the opinion that this proceeding is improperly before me and the relator’s claim should not be considered on a writ of habeas corpus * *

It is therefore,, necessary to dismiss the writ. Writ dismissed.

Ordered accordingly.
# C_2015381EN.01000501.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — Smaranda Bara and Others v Președintele Casei Naționale de Asigurări de Sănătate, Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF)

(Case C-201/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 95/46/EC - Processing of personal data - Articles 10 and 11 - Data subjects’ information - Article 13 - Exceptions and limitations - Transfer by a public administrative body of a Member State of personal tax data for processing by another public administrative body))

(2015/C 381/05)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Smaranda Bara and Others

Applicant:

Defendants: Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate, Președintele Casei Naționale de Asigurări de Sănătate, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF)

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 10, 11 and 13 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995, on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, must be interpreted as precluding national measures, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which allow a public administrative body of a Member State to transfer personal data to another public administrative body and their subsequent processing, without the data subjects having been informed of that transfer or processing.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
No. 10-7126.

#### Alberto Maciel-Alcala, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 673,

178 L. Ed. 2d 501,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9357.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 1092.
CITY OF INTERNATIONAL FALLS 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Office of the Secretary 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

August 6, 2012 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

600 FOURTH STREET 

INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MN 56649 

Telephone 218/283-9484 

FAX 218/283-3590 

OFFICE OF MAYOR 

Timothy "Chopper" McBride r""-··' 

On behalf of the City of International Falls and the greater International Falls community, the 

International Falls City Council respectfully requests that the United States Department of 

Transportation select Sky West Airlines as the Essential Air Service carrier for Falls International Airport 

based on Sky West's recent proposal for service. 

We understand the Sovereign Air proposal for our airport is not under serious consideration at this time 

because of certain lacking licensures and, while we have found Great Lakes Airlines representatives to 

be open and congenial in our dealings with them, it is clear that the type and level of service offered by 

Sky West is much better suited to our needs and our market. It appears to be more economical as well. 

We have been in conversation with Brainerd-Crow Wing airport and it appears they are similarly 

inclined. We understand that the pairing of the two is one of the package elements requested by Sky 

West. We have paired with Brainerd in the past and have always had a cooperative and collegial 

relationship with them. We look forward to working with Brainerd again as an air service partner and 

~~fcfi'ging a strong team with them ahd Sky WestAirlines to the benefit of all. 

Other community members and organizations may have contributions to make regarding this matter 

and we respectfully request that you consider their comments and opinions as they are submitted. We 

are standing by to work with you, Brainerd and Sky West to ensure a seamless transition and a 

productive partnership. 

Thank you, as always, for your assistance in this matter. 

Timothy "Chopper" McBride, Mayor 

City of International Falls
No. 10-7469.

#### Fernando Maldonado, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1184, 131 S. Ct. 1008,

178 L. Ed. 2d 837,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 834.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000058

24-FEB-2016

07:52 AM
Leaders for 

a TB-Free 

United States. 

Robert Koch 

discovered the 

bacillus that causes 

tuberculosis (TB).

Albert Schatz, 

Elizabeth Bugie, and 

Selman Waksman 

developed streptomycin, 

the first antibiotic 

effective against TB.

Clemens von 

Pirquet

developed the 

tuberculin skin test 

for TB infection.

1882

1944

1907

2018 ?

We can 

make 

history. 

MARCH 24

WORLD TB DAY 

Wanted:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1 5 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk June 1 5 , 2021

16 2 85 5 ( 65 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 2 85 5

v COA: 35 3537

Mackinac CC: 19

- 008346

- AR

, 19

- 008347

- AR

WALTER JOSEPH CASWELL

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

_______ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out

- of

state attorney Mason D. Morisset to appear and practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A)

is GRANTED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00618

- CV

In re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator T exas Department of Family and Protective Servic es has filed a petition

for writ of mandamus

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1

. The C ourt orders the real party in interest to

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 11, 2022.

It i s ordered on October 4 , 2022

.

Before Chief J ustice Byrne and Justices Triana and Smith
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00611

- CR Raymond SANDOVAL , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008

- CR

- 14433 Honorable Angus McGinty , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 7, 2012
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION On April 14, 2010, appellant was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of three years. On February 7, 2012, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt and revoke appellant’s community supervision; it subsequently filed two s upplements to the pending motion. The trial court entered an order on August 1, 2012 continuing appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision, but modifying the conditions of community supervision by ordering appellant to enter a residential tr eatment program. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of his community supervision. This court04

- 12

- 00611

- CR

- 2

- does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying the conditions of comm unity supervision. See Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State , 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1995, no pet.). On October 1, 2012, this court issued an order for appellant to show cause within ten days expl aining why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s counsel has filed a written response agreeing that this appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Vote
Power Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2007
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities  as
Chief Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 30, 2008            By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   CEO and
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
No. 10-349.

#### Shell Oil Company, et al., Petitioners v. Nancy Fuller Hebble, et al.

562 U.S. 1124, 131 S. Ct. 822,

178 L. Ed. 2d 579,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9730.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of International Association of Defense Counsel, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of The American Petroleum Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Third Division, denied.

Same case below, 238 P.3d 939.
No. 10-7818.

#### Felix Gabriel Castro-Davis, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 970,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 383.

178 L. Ed. 2d 797,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 53.
No. 10-7846.

#### Edward Sims, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1162, 131 S. Ct. 972,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 360.

178 L. Ed. 2d 798,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 910.
No. 10-7636.

#### Ruben Sanchez-Guzman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 955,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 395.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 8.
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB  for the period ending  December 31, 2003
(the "Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
November 8, 2005
No. D-2524.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Michael Henry Ditton.

562 U.S. 812, 131 S. Ct. 402,

178 L. Ed. 2d 267,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7543.

October 4, 2010.

Michael Henry Ditton, of Bozeman, Montana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NIC Inc. (the “Company) each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: November 4, 2010





/s/ Harry Herington


Harry Herington


Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Stephen M. Kovzan


Stephen M. Kovzan


Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Quixote Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the Annual Period ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:



Date: September 14, 2009

/s/ BRUCE REIMER Bruce Reimer, Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 14, 2009

/s/ DANIEL P. GOREY Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
EXHIBIT
32.B
      CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John
      R. SultJohn R.
      SultSenior Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)El Paso
      Natural Gas Company
     March 1,
      2010


A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by
El Paso Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Rios, Gerardo

From: Rios, Gerardo

Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:58 AM

To: Jim.Rexroad@macquarie.com

Cc: WALTERS, JULIE; Rivera, Shirley; Drake, Kerry

Subject: Extension Request

Hi Jim, 

As we discussed last week, here is an electronic copy of the acknowledgement letter for the Avenal Energy Project PSD 

permit extension request. 

Avenal - 

OAR-0848.pdf

Gerardo C. Rios 

Chief, Permits Office 

Air Division 

PHONE:(415) 972-3974 

FAX: (415) 947-3579