alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ James A. WhiteJames A. WhiteChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NIC Inc. (the “Company) each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 4, 2011





/s/ Harry Herington


Harry Herington


Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Stephen M. Kovzan


Stephen M. Kovzan


Chief Financial Officer
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders  of First Niles Financial, Inc.Niles, Ohio

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition of First Niles Financial, Inc. and its subsidiary as of June 30, 2000, the related consolidated statements of income for the
three-month and six-month periods then ended, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income and cash flows for the six-month period then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective
of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet of First Niles Financial, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 24, 2000, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 have not been audited, reviewed, or compiled by us and,
accordingly, we assume no responsibility for them.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 99th District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on October 3,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Garry White v. Officer J. Bevan, Patricia Aristimono, M.D.,

Benson Alfred, Officer J. Garue, Jesse Hurley, L.V.N.,

Dr. Twalisha Williams, Beatrice Gutierrez, and Officer Wanida Harrell

Case Number: 07-14-00234-CV Trial Court Number: 2013-506,098

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated Friday, October 3, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on February 10, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-65-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Report of GRI Refunds

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 26, 1998, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) submitted its Report of Gas Research Institute (GRI) Refunds for 
1997 pursuant to Subpart F of Part 154 of the Commission's Regulations 
and ordering paragraph (C) of the Commission's order issued on February 
22, 1995 at Docket No. RP95-124-000.
    On May 29, 1998, El Paso received a refund from GRI for 
overcollections for the calendar year 1997 in the amount of 
$435,572.00. On June 11, 1998, El Paso states that it refunded its 
eligible firm shippers as required by the February 22, 1995 order by 
crediting each shipper's applicable transportation invoice.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 7, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17892 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Energy Conversion
     Devices, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the
     "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies:

          1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


     /s/ Robert C. Stempel
     ------------------------------

     Robert C. Stempel
     Chief Executive Officer
     May 24, 2005


     /s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
     ------------------------------
     Stephan W. Zumsteg
     Chief Financial Officer
     May 24, 2005


<PAGE>
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-17-1999

Witkowski v. Welch

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1213

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Witkowski v. Welch" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 131.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/131
 

 No. 98-1213 

 JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D.; GRACE WITKOWSKI; 

 JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D., P.C. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN; 

 JOSEPH A. WITKOWSKI, M.D., TRUSTEE, 

 

 Appellants 

 v. 

 

 ROBERT G. WELCH; ROBERT G. WELCH, P.C.;

INTREPID ONE SERVICES, INC.; HISTORICAL SECOND STREET DEVELOPMENT 

 ASSOCIATES; ROBERT G. WELCH, GENERAL PARTNER; ROBERT G. WELCH, 

 TRUSTEE; RONALD J. SRIEN, MORTGAGEE 

 

 Notice of Corrections to Opinion 

 Please note the following correction to the opinion issued in the 

aboveentitled appeal on May , 1999: 

 On page 4 of the slip opinion in footnote 6, the sentence 

 which begins with, "The Appellees...," should read, "The 

 Appellants...." 

This correction should be made to the final version of the opinion when it 

is published. 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk 

 Clerk 

May 17, 1999
# C_2015198EN.01001501.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania)) — SC Enterprise Focused Solutions SRL v Spitalul Județean de Urgență Alba Iulia

(Case C-278/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Supply - Technical specifications - Principles of equal treatment and of non-discrimination - Obligation of transparency - Reference to a product of a particular brand - Assessment of the equivalence of the product offered by a tenderer - Reference product no longer in production))

(2015/C 198/19)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Enterprise Focused Solutions SRL

Applicant:

Defendant: Spitalul Județean de Urgență Alba Iulia

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(8) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1251/2011 of 30 November 2011, is not applicable to a public contract with a value below the threshold for application laid down by that directive. In the context of a public contract not subject to that directive but which has certain cross-border interest, which it is for the referring court to ascertain, the fundamental rules and general principles of the FEU Treaty, in particular the principles of equal treatment and of non-discrimination and the consequent obligation of transparency, must be interpreted as meaning that the contracting authority cannot reject a tender which satisfies the requirements of the contract notice on grounds which are not set out in that notice.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Soler, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 462]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sciarrino, J., at plea; Hecht, J., at sentence), rendered March 2, 2016, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Balkin, J.P., Miller, Duffy, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos. 2-85483, 33-02768, 33-11904,
33-37224, 33-46671, 333-10725, 333-41861, 333-53383 and 333-78767) of ECC
International Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated August 10, 1999
relating to the financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Orlando, Florida
September  28, 1999
No. 10-8019.

#### Lawrence Everett Clark, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1193, 131 S. Ct. 1034,

178 L. Ed. 2d 853,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 680.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 842.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AND

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 169

Electronic Piece Count Scale Implementation

The Parties agree:

1. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Council 169 (Union) and 

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA, Agency, or Management) (collectively the parties), 

hereby enter into this Memorandum of Agreement regarding Electronic Piece Count 

Scale Implementation, as it applies to bargaining unit employees covered by the 2016 

Master Labor Agreement (MLA) between the parties.

 

2. The Agency will calibrate the Electronic Piece Count Scales based on manufacture 

recommendations. Counts completed with an Electronic Piece Count scale will be 

annotated. Provided Bargaining Unit Employees follow the SOP for the Electronic Piece 

Count Scales, disciplinary actions will not be taken against a Bargaining Unit Employee 

solely for count discrepancies based on the use of the Electronic Piece Count Scales.

3. The Agency will request damaged or broken Electronic Piece Count Scales be repaired 

or replaced following notification the Electronic Piece Count Scale is damaged/broken. 

4. The Agency will discuss any substantial performance plan changes related to the use of 

the Electronic Piece Count Scale with the affected Bargaining Unit Employee and a draft 

copy will be provided to the employee and the Union in accordance with Article 18 of the 

2016 MLA. 

For the Union: For the Agency: 

_________________________ _______________________

Terry A. Day Date Sharyn Saunders Date 

President, AFGE Council 169 Director, DLA 

Human Resources
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1 156

DOMINION COAL CORPORATION

,

Petitioner

,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JOHN H. FULLER

,

Respondents

.

O n Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (21

- 0382

- BLA)

A rgued : May 7 , 202 4 Decided: June 12, 2024

Before DIAZ, Chief Judge

, and WILKINSON and KING

, Circuit Judges

.

Petition for review denied; orders affirmed by un published per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Charity Ann Barger, STREET LAW FIRM, LLP, Grundy, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brad Anthony Austin, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & AUSTIN, Norton, Virginia, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1156 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/12/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Dominion Coal Corporation petitions for review of two orders of the Benefits

Review Board (the “BRB”)

— (1) the BRB’s June 23, 2022 order reversing the decision

of an administrative law judge (the “ALJ”) denying the Black Lung Benefits Act claim of

former underground coal miner John H. Fuller, and (2) the BRB’s January 11, 2023 order

denying Dominion’s request for reconsideration of the June 23, 2022 order. By those

orders, the BRB ruled that Fuller is entitled to black lung benefits and that there is no cause

to remand the matter to the ALJ.

Having carefully considered the administrative record , as well as the parties’ briefs

and oral arguments in this Court, we are satisfied that the BRB did not commit reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Dominion’s petition for review and affirm the orders of the

BRB.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED;

ORDERS AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1156 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/12/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 03-15-00490-CR & 03-15-00491-CR

ERNEST PEREZ

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

)

)

)

IN COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION TO

EXTEND TIME FOR FILING BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Ernest Perez, Appellant, through counsel, Ken Mahaffey, and

respectfully moves to extend the time for filing the Appellant’s Brief in the above

styled and numbered cause. In support thereof, Appellant would show the Court the

following:

1. JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION. The judgment being appealed was

imposed in the 274th District Court of Hays County on July 6, 2015. Appellant was

convicted of Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Felon and Possession of

Methamphetamine more than 4 grams but less than 200 grams.

2. APPELLANT IN CUSTODY. Appellant was sentenced to 30 years and is

currently serving that sentence.

3. DATE BRIEF DUE. Appellant’s brief is due on November 9, 2015.

4. FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION. This is the first motion for extension

of time to file a brief filed by either party.

Page 1

ACCEPTED

03-15-00490-CR

7730564

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/9/2015 8:13:14 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/9/2015 8:13:14 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
5. REASON FOR EXTENSION. Counsel has been required to work on other

appellate matters during the last thirty days. These are identified as follows:

a. Preparation of Motion for Rehearing in Arteaga v. State, No. 13-13-00612-

CR & 13-13-00613-CR;

b. Preparation of a Petition for Discretionary Review in Manuel v. State, 

01-14-00107-CR.

6. DURATION OF EXTENSION SOUGHT. Appellant respectfully requests

this Court grant an extension of time for thirty (30) days to file its brief in this cause.

7. EXTENSION REASONABLE. An extension of time would be reasonable

because it will facilitate the proper research and briefing of the issues in this cause.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully moves to

extend the time for filing the Appellant’s Brief in this cause by thirty (30) days. 

Respectfully Submitted,

Ken Mahaffey

Counsel for Appellant 

P.O. Box 684585

Austin, Texas 78768

(512) 444-6557

St. Bar. No. 12830050

Ken Mahaffey@yahoo.com

Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The above signature certifies that on November 6, 2015, this document was sent

by electronic service to the Hays County D.A.’s Office and by mail to Ernest Perez,

02016895, 295 I.H. 45 North, Huntsville, TX 77320-8443. 

Page 3