Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
														Search

		Submit


Tuberculosis (TB)


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Report of Expert Consultations on Rapid Molecular Testing to Detect Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the United States										Related Pages
										General Recommendations of the Expert Panel
All U.S. clinicians and public health TB programs should have access to molecular DR tests to aid in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of TB.
Molecular DR testing should be performed on one AFB smear-positive or NAA-positive respiratory specimen or one *M. tuberculosis* culture from each TB patient or TB suspect.
Testing should also include specimens regardless of AFB smear result or isolates from persons that the TB Control Program designates as high priority for molecular DR testing. However, programs must be aware that the performance of molecular DR tests with AFB-smear negative specimens has not been established.
Testing of a second sample (specimen or isolate) from a patient would be appropriate in situations deemed high priority by the TB program (e.g., a patient who is failing first-line therapy even though the initial molecular DR test indicated rifampin susceptibility or relapse in a patient who was non-adherent to the initial treatment plan).
A phased approach to developing and implementing a molecular DR testing service is recommended. For example, the initial service could provide molecular DR testing for TB patients or suspects deemed high priority by the TB program, while CDC and partners design and implement a feasible, practical, universal molecular DR testing service.
State and local TB control programs should develop, disseminate, and implement a protocol that enables health care providers in their jurisdiction to access the regional molecular DR testing services, including specifying criteria for selecting TB suspects or patients for testing. A standard test request (sample submission) form should be developed.
The initial molecular DR testing service should include detection of mutations associated with rifampin resistance and those associated with isoniazid resistance. The molecular DR testing service should incorporate molecular DR tests for fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and drugs for which conventional testing is problematic (e.g., ethambutol, pyrazinamide) as they are validated.
Because data are not available at this time that clearly demonstrate the superiority of any of the currently validated methods over another, the panel does not recommend which test should be used in the molecular DR testing service. The decision of which test to implement in the molecular DR testing service may ultimately rest upon cost, performance, throughput, and turnaround time. Whichever technology is used, validation of the test and meeting all pertinent CLIA and FDA regulations by the molecular DR testing laboratory are essential.
The molecular DR testing service should be designed such that it is able to take advantage of improvements in technologies and the understanding of the molecular basis of drug resistance.
The possibility of linking NAA testing for detection of *M. tuberculosis* with molecular DR testing either sequentially (local laboratory to molecular DR testing laboratory) or as a combined test at the molecular DR testing laboratory should be explored to determine if it would be is a cost-effective, reliable approach to providing services to state and local TB programs.
Up to four laboratories will be needed initially to provide universal molecular DR testing and their services should be coordinated with the services of the TB RTMCCs. This would provide (a) increased molecular DR testing capacity, (b) a reasonable workload per laboratory which may facilitate meeting turnaround times, (c) redundancy and surge capacity, (d) geographic distribution, (e) close collaboration with experts in the treatment of MDR TB, and (f) opportunities for rechecking and external quality control.
Molecular DR testing laboratories should have the ability to test isolates and processed and non-processed specimens. Only respiratory specimens should be routinely tested. Other specimens such as CSF or tissue samples may be tested in priority situations.
In a rollout phase, the molecular DR testing laboratories might primarily test processed specimens. In this phase, specimens would be collected, sent to the state or local public health laboratory, processed at the state or local laboratory, determined to be AFB-positive, and submitted to the molecular DR testing laboratory.
The numbers of non-processed and processed specimens tested will depend on the protocols developed by local programs to select patients and submit specimens. TB programs must provide reliable estimates of the numbers of non-processed and processed specimens to be submitted to enable the molecular DR testing laboratories to project the costs of molecular DR testing,
The interval from specimen collection to reporting of the test result to the treating clinician must be as brief as possible. Laboratories and programs should track this performance measure.
Specimens must be delivered promptly to the molecular DR testing laboratory.
An overnight delivery service should be used. State programs may need to provide training for local laboratorians in packaging and shipping, because delivery services such as FedEx only accept shipments packaged by a certified shipper.
Laboratories must promptly package and ship samples to the molecular DR testing laboratory and avoid delays associated with batching specimens for shipment. For non-processed specimens, this is probably the day the specimen is collected. For processed specimens, this is probably the day after the specimen is received in the primary laboratory.
Specimens must be tested promptly in the molecular DR testing laboratory, preferably on the day received (i.e., without introducing significant delays by batching specimens).
Six day a week service is preferred.
The molecular DR test results should be available within 2 business days of specimen receipt.
An initial positive molecular DR test result must be treated as a critical test value. It must be immediately reported to the clinician and to public health authorities. Laboratorians should be available for consultation as to test interpretation and need for follow-up testing.
Detection of rifampin resistance must trigger expedited, reflex testing for susceptibility to first-line and second-line drugs (SLD) by conventional culture-based methods and available molecular methods. This could be done at the molecular DR testing laboratory, the submitting laboratory, a state public health laboratory, a center of excellence for SLD testing, or CDC.
Each TB program should designate who would be notified of the molecular DR test results.
The preferred method of reporting is via electronic means such as secure email or posting results on a secure web site.
The detection of drug resistance in specimen or isolate should be reported by telephone to facilitate prompt action by the program and clinician.
Standardized reporting language should be developed and used.
In all cases, reporting must meet requirements for maintaining patient confidentiality.
Procedures for detecting and reporting discrepancies between the results of molecular and conventional testing must be developed and implemented. Clinicians should use clinical judgment and the conventional DS result for isoniazid and rifampin for case management decisions, until the discrepancy is resolved.
The responsibility for identifying discrepancies lies with those having timely access to the molecular DR and conventional DS results. This may be the treating clinician, TB program or public health laboratory.
Procedures must be in place for reporting discrepant results and providing consultation.
Regardless of who detects a discrepancy, protocols are needed for distributing information to all involved parties and follow-up testing to resolve the discrepancy.
Protocols for analyzing discrepancies between conventional and molecular DR results must be developed and implemented.
The molecular DR test should be repeated on the remnant of the original specimen or a sample of the culture from the patient.
The initial molecular DR result should be evaluated for concerns such as unusual amplification or evidence of a mixed population of bacteria (a low percentage of resistant bacteria may lead to false-susceptible molecular DR results).
The conventional DS result should be evaluated for concerns such as contamination that might produce false-resistant results.
Repeating the conventional DS tests should be considered.
A sample of the culture patient should be submitted to a referee laboratory (e.g., CDC) for additional molecular (e.g., sequencing) and conventional testing.
State and local TB programs should share some of the cost of the molecular DR testing. One possibility would be for programs or test requestors to pay the cost of shipping specimens to the molecular DR testing laboratories.
The activities of the molecular DR testing and TB genotyping laboratories should be coordinated (possibly integrated) to avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts at the local or regional laboratory for shipping and testing of isolates.
A reliable laboratory service includes procedures for internal and external quality control and a robust monitoring and evaluation plan.
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  September 1, 2012					Content source: 	Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention homeTuberculosisBasic TB Factsplus iconHow TB SpreadsLatent TB Infection and TB DiseaseSigns & SymptomsTB Risk FactorsExposure to TBTB PreventionVaccinesTB & HIV CoinfectionTB and DiabetesTB TermsPersonal StoriesTesting & Diagnosisplus iconWho Should be TestedTesting for TB InfectionTesting in BCG-Vaccinated PersonsTB Screening and Testing of Health Care PersonnelTesting During PregnancyDiagnosing latent TB infection and TB diseaseTreatmentplus iconDeciding When to Treat Latent TB InfectionTreatment Regimens for Latent TB Infection (LTBI)Treatment for TB DiseaseAdverse EventsTB Treatment of Persons Living with HIVTB Treatment and PregnancyTB Treatment for ChildrenFrequently Asked QuestionsDrug-Resistant TBResearchplus iconTB Epidemiologic Studies Consortiumplus iconResearch ProjectsPublicationsTB Trials Consortiumplus iconStudy DescriptionsBackgroundBehavioral & Social Science ResearchHealth Care Settingsplus iconTB Infection Control in Health Care SettingsResources for TB Screening and Testing of Health Care Personnelplus iconFrequently Asked QuestionsTB in Specific Populationsplus iconHealth DisparitiesAsian PersonsBlack or African American PersonsHispanic or Latino PersonsChildrenPregnancyCorrectional FacilitiesPeople Experiencing HomelessnessInternational TravelersLaboratory Informationplus iconDrug Susceptibility TestingFalse-Positive Investigation ToolkitInterim Laboratory Biosafety Guidance for XDR  tuberculosis strainsModel Performance Evaluation Program (MPEP)Rapid Molecular Testing to Detect Drug-Resistant TB in the USplus iconExecutive SummaryIntroductionBackground on Tests for Molecular Detection of DRGeneral Considerations and Principles for a Molecular DR Testing ServicePossible Scenarios and Scope of Testing for a Molecular DR Testing ServiceResearch NeedsGeneral Recommendations of the Expert PanelCommunication Plan for the ReportRecommendationsReferencesPanel Members and CDC ParticipantsAppendix 1Appendix 2Appendix 3The Uses of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Diagnosis of TBplus iconGeneral ConsiderationsGeneral Recommendations of the Expert PanelRecommendations to ACET, CDC, DTBEData & Statisticsplus iconTB Incidence in the United StatesReported TB in the US, 2022 Surveillance Reportplus iconNational DataReporting Area DataRisk FactorsDemographicsTB Treatment and Case OutcomesDrug-Resistant TBMolecular SurveillanceTuberculosis in the United States, 2022 (Slide Set)Archived Surveillance Reports and Slide Sets2021 State and City ReportArchived State and City ReportsProfessional Resources & Toolsplus iconTools for Healthcare ProvidersResources for TB Programsplus iconStrengthening Civil Surgeons’ Capacity to Improve LTBI Surveillance and Outcomes Among Status AdjustersNotice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)Program EvaluationTB Centers of ExcellenceTB Elimination AllianceTB Genotypingplus iconConventional TB GenotypingWhole Genome SequencingTB GIMSAnalytic ToolsLatent Tuberculosis Infection ResourcesPublications & Productsplus iconPatient and Public MaterialsFact SheetsGuidelinesplus iconControl & EliminationDrug-Resistant TBInfection Control & PreventionLaboratory & GenotypingTB & HIVTB in Specific PopulationsTesting & DiagnosisTreatmentVaccines & ImmunizationsArchived TB GuidelinesGuides & Toolkitsplus iconAggregate ReportsCDC TB Surveillance TrainingCore CurriculumEffective TB Interviewing for Contact InvestigationEthnographic GuidesFalse-Positive Investigation ToolkitForging Partnerships to Eliminate TuberculosisGuide to Application of GenotypingLTBI: A Guide for Primary Health Care ProvidersMantoux Tuberculin Skin Testing ProductsReport of Verified Case of Tuberculosis (RVCT)Self-Study ModulesTB Contact Investigation Interviewing Skills CourseTB eDOT ToolkitUnderstanding the TB Cohort Review ProcessNewslettersplus iconTB Notes, No. 4, 2023TB Notes, No. 3, 2023TB Notes. No. 2, 2023TB Notes. No. 1, 2023TB Notes, No. 4, 2022TB Notes, No. 3, 2022TB Notes, No. 2, 2022TB Notes, No. 1, 2022TB Notes, No. 4, 2021TB Notes, No. 3, 2021TB Notes, No. 2, 2021TB Notes, No. 1, 2021Pamphlets, Brochures, Bookletsplus iconQuestions and AnswersPatient Education SeriesTuberculosis - Get the FactsTuberculosis - The Connection between TB and HIV12-Dose Regimen for Latent TB Infection-Patient Education BrochurePostersplus iconMantoux Tuberculin Skin Test Wall ChartWorld TB DayThink TBStop TBTake on TBReports & Articlesplus iconDTBE Authored Journal ArticlesTuberculosis Laboratory Aggregate ReportsSlide Setsplus iconIntroduction to TuberculosisEpidemiology of Tuberculosis Among Non-U.S.​–Born Persons in the United States, 1993–2016Self-Study Modules on Tuberculosis, 1-5 Slide SetsThe Tuberculosis (TB) in Correctional Settingsplus iconFacilitator GuideIntroduction to TB GenotypingEpidemiology of Tuberculosis in Correctional Facilities, United States, 1993-2017Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis in Correctional and Detention FacilitiesGuidelines for Preventing the Transmission of M. TB in Health care SettingsInvestigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious TBEpidemiology of Pediatric Tuberculosis in the United StatesTargeted Tuberculosis Testing and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis InfectionElectronic Tools & ResourcesWeb-Based Courses & Webinarsplus iconTB 101 for Health Care WorkersContent SyndicationInfographicsplus iconSocial Media GraphicsCustomizable Take on TB Infographic with InstructionsEventsWorld TB Dayplus iconU.S. TB ChampionsHistoryFeaturesplus iconTB Risk FactorsTreating Latent TB Infection with Short-Course RegimensWorld Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2021World Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2020Linksplus iconState TB Control OfficesAbout Usplus iconMission Statement and Activitiesplus iconDTBE Strategic PlanNational TB Program ObjectivesOrganization ChartAdvisory Groupsplus iconFederal TB Task Force To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address: Email Address			What's this?				Submit


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue