alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33934-33935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98C-0431]


EM Industries, Inc.; Filing of Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that EM 
Industries, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that the color 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 
synthetic iron oxide to color ingested drugs at levels higher than the 
current limit and to provide for the safe use of mica to color ingested 
drugs.


[[Page 33935]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aydin Orstan, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3076.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 721(d)(1) (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1))), notice is given that a 
color additive petition (CAP 8C0257) has been filed by EM Industries, 
Inc., 7 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532. The petition proposes to 
amend the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of 
synthetic iron oxide to color ingested drugs at levels higher than the 
current limit and to provide for the safe use of mica to color ingested 
drugs.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(r) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Laura M. Tarantino,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 98-16504 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 10-7272.

#### Sylvester Mead, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 930,

178 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 399.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.1





Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Escalade, Incorporated (Company) on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475, 333-52477, 333-142756 and 333-142757) of our report dated March 1, 2011, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 25, 2010, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ BKD, LLPBKD,LLPEvansville, IndianaMarch 1, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             467,910 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      200,161 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20,000 
<INVENTORY>                                         60,041 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   935,125 
<PP&E>                                             456,236 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     231,351 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,327,035 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              396,394 
<BONDS>                                            251,520 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           289,282 
<OTHER-SE>                                         389,839 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,327,035 
<SALES>                                          1,436,489 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,436,489 
<CGS>                                            1,058,519 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,862,226 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,417 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (226,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (226,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (13,990)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (240,030)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)
                                               


</TABLE>
No. 132, (R46-009).

Original.

#### Alabama, et al., Plaintiffs v. North Carolina.

562 U.S. 1175, 131 S. Ct. 1041,

178 L. Ed. 2d 822,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 909.

January 18, 2011.

The bill of complaint in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Former decision, 560 U.S. 330, 130 S. Ct. 2295, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1070, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4381.
# C_2014282EN.01003201.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — Montres Tudor (GLAMOUR)

(Case T-1/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark GLAMOUR - Earlier international mark TUDOR GLAMOUR - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 282/41

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: T. Raab, H. Lauf and V. Ahmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Montres Tudor SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: J.P. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda de Sousa and C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2012 (Case R 213/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Montres Tudor SA and Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
Employee Spotlights: Brian Rowlette
 
  **Man posing near wall
        Employee Spotlight: Brian Rowlette
            Get to know Brian Rowlette of DLA Disposition Services Qatar.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: DLA Disposition Services
                    
                    VIRIN: 220711-D-D0441-202** My job with DLA is to coordinate DEMIL property for processing and destruction. I am currently assigned to Qatar, but normally cover Hawaii. **How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?** I have worked for the federal government 19 years. I have been with DLA 3 years. **What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?**I get paid to break things. **What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?** Best advice I have been given is, "If you can’t talk and work, then just work". **What was your first job?**My first job was bucking alfalfa bails on a farm when I was 12 years old. **Name your favorite/recent book(s) you have read.** The last books I read were the Jesse Stone series written by Robert B. Parker **What are some of your passions outside of work?**Outside of work, I like to hunt, fish, hike and go camping. **If you could choose to do anything for a day, what would it be?**If I could do anything for a day, it would be work as a back country outfitter in either Alaska or Montana.
No. 10-7490.

#### Marty LeJeune, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1009,

178 L. Ed. 2d 838,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 785.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02
                              THE BANC CORPORATION
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Banc Corporation
(the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 9, 2004                       /s/ David R. Carter
                                            -------------------
                                                David R. Carter
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.4




Exhibit 4.4


AIRGAS, INC. 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II
AMENDMENT NO. 3


WHEREAS, Airgas, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Airgas, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan II effective July 1, 2006 (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide a longer period during which a distribution may occur following a specified date or separation from service; and
WHEREAS, the Company, by action of its Board of Directors, retained the right to amend the Plan under Article IX thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2008, the Plan is amended as follows:
Section 5.2(d) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(d) Commencement of Payments.  Payment shall commence as soon as practical, but in no event later than ninety days after the date selected by the Participant under this Section 5.2, and subsequent payments, if the form of payment selected provides for subsequent payments, shall be made on the anniversary of the initial payment.”
TO RECORD THE ADOPTION OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer this 16th day of October, 2008.
AIRGAS, INC.
By:    /s/ Dwight T. Wilson


Title:  Senior Vice President – Human Resources
# C_2014315EN.01003301.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/33

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpulung — Romania) — Liliana Tudoran, Florin Iulian Tudoran, Ilie Tudoran v SC Suport Colect SRL

(Case C-92/14) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directives 93/13/EEC and 2008/48/EC - Temporal and material scope - Facts preceding the accession of Romania to the European Union - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of EU law - Failure to implement Union law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 315/53

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Judecătoria Câmpulung

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Liliana Tudoran, Florin Iulian Tudoran, Ilie Tudoran

Applicants:

Defendant: SC Suport Colect SRL

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC are not applicable to the dispute in the main proceedings.

In addition, firstly, the Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the third question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Judecătoria Câmpulung (Romania) by decision of 25 February 2014; secondly, the fifth question referred for a preliminary ruling by that court is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.02CERTIFICATIONSI, James C. Gossett, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The BancCorporation;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors : a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 17, 2006      By:/s/ James C. Gossett         James C. Gossett     Chief Accounting Officer ( Pricipal Financial Officer)  
29
No. 10-501.

#### Sharon Taylor, et al., Petitioners v. Acxiom Corporation, et al.

562 U.S. 1169, 131 S. Ct. 908,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 38.

178 L. Ed. 2d 804,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 325.
# C_2015302EN.01001101.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands)) — TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd and Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV

(Case C-379/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5 - Products bearing a trade mark released for free circulation and placed under the duty suspension arrangement without the consent of the proprietor of the trade mark - Right of that proprietor to oppose that placing - Definition of ‘using in the course of trade’))

(2015/C 302/14)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV, Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd

Applicants:

Defendants: Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd, TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark registered in one or more Member States may oppose a third party placing goods bearing that trade mark under the duty suspension arrangement after they have been introduced into the EEA and released for free circulation without the consent of that proprietor.

---

(1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15998]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 1, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Thomas H. Olson Family Limited Partnership, Lisco, Nebraska (of 
which Thomas H. Olson and Cynthia A. Olson are the sole general 
partners); to acquire voting shares of First Nebraska Bancs, Inc., 
Sidney, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank, 
Sidney, Nebraska; First National Bank, Julesburg, Colorado; and First 
National Bank, Torrington, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 11, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15998 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 10-7637.

#### Dusty Ray Spencer, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1049,

178 L. Ed. 2d 869,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1061.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 1170.
EXHIBIT
23.2




CONSENT
OF ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-88588, 333-39589, 333-112172 and 333-140724) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113690, 333-89473, 333-23091, 333-39493,
333-54018, 333-54026, 333-71548, 333-122840, 333-122841, 333-132558, 333-132559,
333-143720, 333-147240, 333-157258, and 333-157262) of LaserCard Corporation of
our report dated June 4, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements
as of March 31, 2008 and for each of the two years in the period ended March 31,
2008, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2009.




We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June 4, 2008
on the financial statement schedule which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.




/s/Odenberg,
Ullakko, Muranishi & Co. LLP




San
Francisco, California


June 15,
2009
# C_2016145EN.01000901.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — Air Baltic Corporation AS v Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba

(Case C-429/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Montreal Convention - Articles 19, 22 and 29 - Liability of air carrier in the event of delay in the international carriage of passengers - Contract of carriage concluded by the passengers’ employer - Damage caused by delay - Damage suffered by the employer))

(2016/C 145/09)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Air Baltic Corporation AS

Applicant:

Defendant: Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, concluded at Montreal on 28 May 1999, in particular Articles 19, 22 and 29 thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier which has concluded a contract of international carriage with an employer of persons carried as passengers, such as the employer at issue in the main proceedings, is liable to that employer for damage occasioned by a delay in flights on which its employees were passengers pursuant to that contract, on account of which the employer incurred additional expenditure.

---

(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014.

1

---