alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.


Consent of Rotenberg & Co., LLP










CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.


Saratoga Springs, New York






As successor by merger, effective October 1, 2009, to the registered public accounting firm Rotenberg & Co., LLP, weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the 2000 and 2007 Stock Option Plans of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. of our report dated September 9, 2010, with respect to the financial statements and schedules of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






/S/ EFP Rotenberg llp


Rochester, New York


September 9, 2010
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna’s PrepareAthon topic #1: Severe Spring Weather Preparedness – Thunderstorms and Tornadoes 

/ Published April 4, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna Security & Emergency Services team initiated a preparedness program for the month of April. Deemed “April Prepareathon,” the Emergency Management team will provide a new topic each week this month to assist employees with preparing for disasters and other emergencies. 

This week’s topic covers severe weather, notably, thunderstorms and tornadoes. 

“Once again we observe the month of April as a PrepareAthon, a program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to motivate everyone to act and to prepare for disasters that may affect their communities,” stated Installation Emergency Manager Rick Zucchero, in an all-hands email message sent out to installation employees with the following information:

If you watched the news this past December, then you saw that tornadoes can accrue anytime of the year. Some of the most intense, violent and farthest traveling twisters tracked across the United States in December 2021 resulting in the loss of 80 lives and creating devasting destruction to many communities. But did you know that historically, the month of May represents the peak of the U.S. tornado season? May has the highest average number of tornadoes per month with 288 average tornadoes out of 1,376 per year according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

•    Severe thunderstorms can produce dangerous wind and/or large hail which can result in property damage, power outages, injuries and even death          - A **HIGH WIND WATCH** is issued when sustained winds of 40 miles per hour or higher for one hour or more OR wind gusts of 58 mph or higher for any duration are POSSIBLE         - A **HIGH WIND WARNING** is issued when winds of 40 mph or higher for one hour or more **OR** wind gusts of 58 mph or higher for any duration are **EXPECTED**•    If there is a **HIGH WIND WARNING** take shelter at the nearest shelter-in-place location. If you are not at work, seek shelter in a sturdy structure  •    Tornadoes can produce winds that can exceed 200 mph! Flying debris is very dangerous and is most often the cause of injuries or death          - A tornado **WATCH** indicates that conditions are ideal, and a tornado is possible           - A tornado **WARNING** indicates that a tornado is imminent and to take shelter •    If a tornado **WARNING** is issued, seek shelter in the nearest SIP location. If not at work, seek shelter in a basement or interior room away from windows on the lowest floor and cover your head•    Every tornado (despite the size) should be seen as life-threatening

More information about severe weather planning can be found at www.ready.gov.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.       Elk Premium Building Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns
         all of the outstanding stock of (a) Elk Corporation of America, a
         Nevada corporation, (b) Elk Corporation of Alabama, a Delaware
         corporation, (c) Elk Corporation of Texas, a Nevada corporation, (d)
         Elk Corporation of Arkansas, an Arkansas corporation, and (e) Elk
         Performance Nonwoven Fabrics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.       Elk Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of
         the outstanding stock of (a) Chromium Corporation, a Delaware
         corporation, (b) Elk Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (c)
         OEL, LTD, d/b/a Ortloff Engineers, LTD, a Nevada corporation, and (d)
         Cybershield, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding stock of (1) Cybershield International, Inc., a Delaware
         corporation, (2) Cybershield of Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
         and (3) Cybershield of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation.

3.       Elk Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

4.       NELPA, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

5.       Elk Group, L.P., a Texas limited partnership.

6.       Ortloff de Venezuela, S.A., a Republic of Venezuela corporation.
#### In the Matter of Antonio S. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Antonio S., Sr., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[61 NYS3d 226]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert Hettleman, J.), entered on or about June 10, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a combined fact-finding and Family Ct Act § 1028 hearing, determined that respondent father neglected the children Antonio S. and Jordan S., and derivatively neglected Jay den B., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court’s finding that the father neglected Antonio and Jordan by failing to provide proper supervision, failing to provide sufficient food, and inflicting excessive corporal punishment on them *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A], [B]; *see Matter of Alex R. [Maria R.],*81 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2011]; *Matter of Lah De W. [Takisha W.],*78 AD3d 523 [1st Dept 2010]). The caseworker testified that both Antonio and Jordan told her that their father left them alone for extended periods, did not provide adequate food, and hit them with a belt or his hand when they did not clean or refused to panhandle, so that they were afraid of him. The children’s out-of-court statements were properly admitted into evidence because they cross-corroborated each other, and were partly corroborated by the mother’s testimony that she found them left alone in the father’s residence, without food, and had seen the father slap Antonio and seen marks on Antonio’s body *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]; *Matter of Nicole V.,71*NY2d 112, 123-124 [1987]; *Matter of Nephra PI. [Shanel N.],*139 AD3d 485 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*27 NY3d 912 [2016]; *Matter of Jayden R. [Jacqueline C.],*134 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2015]). *421The children’s statements were sufficient to support a finding of excessive corporal punishment, beyond what was reasonable to discipline the children *(see Matter of Alex R. [Maria R.],*81 AD3d at 463). The Family Court properly drew a negative inference from the father’s failure to testify *(Matter of Nicole H.,*12 AD3d 182 [1st Dept 2004]), and providently exercised its discretion in denying the father’s application to compel the children to testify.

The evidence of the father’s neglect of the older children demonstrates such an impaired level of parental judgment as to create a substantial risk of harm to any child in his care, thus supporting the finding that he derivatively neglected the youngest child *(see Matter of Jay den R. [Jacqueline*C]; Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, Kern and Singh, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 11.1

                 ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC. and SUBSIDIARY

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSSES) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          1996          1995*          1994
                                      -----------    ----------    -----------
<S>                                   <C>            <C>           <C>
PRIMARY
   Average shares outstanding           9,370,841     8,003,742      7,637,660
   Dilutive stock options--based 
     upon treasury stock method
     using average market price         1,515,067       886,020              0
                                      -----------    ----------    -----------
       Total                           10,885,908     8,889,762      7,637,660

   Net earnings (losses) as reported  $ 1,054,269    $5,605,664    $(3,892,656)

       Per Share Amount               $       .10    $      .63    $      (.51)
                                      ===========    ==========    ===========

FULLY DILUTED
   Average shares outstanding           9,370,841     8,003,742      7,637,660
   Dilutive stock options--based 
     upon treasury stock method
     using ending market price          1,709,397     1,938,977              0
                                      -----------    ----------    -----------
       Total                           11,080,238     9,942,719      7,637,660

   Net earnings (losses) as reported  $ 1,054,269    $5,605,664    $(3,892,656)

       Per Share Amount               $       .10    $      .56    $      (.51)
                                      ===========    ==========    ===========

</TABLE>

*  Restated.
No. 10-7727.

#### James William Young, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1159, 131 S. Ct. 962,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 111.

178 L. Ed. 2d 793,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 735.
<pre>
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-QSB
Vote Power Corp.


  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vote Power Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bob Martyn, President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date: February 8, 2005                              By: /s/ Bob Martyn
                                                       ---------------------
                                                       Bob Martyn
                                                       President

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Inti
Shaikh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Dated: February 8, 2005           By: /s/ Inti Shaikh
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Inti Shaikh
                                  Secretary & Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vote Power Corp. and will be retained by Vote Power Corp and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-60966 on Form S-3,Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 33-29147 on Form S-8, RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-66488 and 33-72582 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-46773 and 33-87974 on Form S-8, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.333-32433 on Form S-4, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-80377 and 333-80377-1on Form S-3, Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-85612 and 333-85612-01 on FormS-3, Registration Statement No. 333-127459 on FormS-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-102812 and 333-118324 on Form S-8, Registration StatementNo. 333-127702 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-129094 on Form S-3 of our reportsdated March 6, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules of Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and management’s report on the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofDuquesne Light Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
No. 10-477.

#### Jeffrey Lutz, et al., Petitioners v. Anthony E. Sampair, et al.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 825,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9794.

178 L. Ed. 2d 557,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.

Same case below, 784 N.W.2d 65.
No. 10-5922.

#### Dion Banks, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 899,

178 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 100.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.

Same case below, 237 Ill. 2d 154, 343 Ill. Dec. 111, 934 N.E.2d 435.
# Land and Maritime shares Memorial Day message with installation neighbor

/ Published June 1, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Under the glare of intense sunshine DLA Land and Maritime Navy Capt. Brian Ginnane spoke to Bexley, Ohio residents on Memorial Day as part of their Memorial Day celebration. Bexley Mayor Ben Kessler spoke briefly about the importance of Memorial Day and shared his personal experience about his father’s military service and sacrifice. After concluding with a passage from one of his favorite poems Kessler introduced Ginnane to the crowd of approximately 100 residents.As he spoke to the group Ginnane drew from his more than 20 year Navy career, which included numerous deployments, to highlight the commitment shared among service members who serve while protecting the freedoms Americans hold so dear. Focusing the crowd’s attention on the true meaning of Memorial Day Ginnane highlighted Ohioans who made the ultimate sacrifice by giving their lives as part of that sacred service. Among those he mentioned were Bexley High school graduate Lt. Steve Zilberman who died while deployed to Afghanistan and Navy Reservist and DLA Logistics Agency employee Lt. Steve Byus who was also killed in Afghanistan.“This is just a small example of the heroes who have ties to central Ohio and Bexley,” Ginnane said. “We honor them and all those buried around the world.”Ginnane encouraged the veterans in the crowd to share their stories with friends and loved ones, particularly the children, so the nation’s younger generation would remember the valor, courage and integrity demonstrated by those who served and  sacrificed. Taps was played and prayers were offered to close out the program. Many of the Bexley residents spent personal time with Ginnane afterwards expressing thanks for his service, while sharing experiences of their own.
Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                          DOUGLAS & LOMASON COMPANY

                              Year           Jurisdiction of         Percent
Name                          Acquired       Incorporation           Owned
----                          --------       ---------------         -------

<S>                           <C>            <C>                     <C>
Muscogee Warehouse and                       State of
  Forwarding Company          1964           Georgia, USA            100


Douglas y Lomason de                         Ciudad Acuna,
  Mexico S.A. de C.V.         1987           Mexico                  100


Douglas y Lomason de                         Saltillo,
  Coahuila S.A. de C.V.       1992           Mexico                  100


Bestop, Inc.                  1995           State of
                                             Delaware, USA           100
</TABLE>
# C_2015236EN.01001701.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Neamț — Romania) — Sindicatul Cadrelor Militare Disponibilizate în rezervă și în retragere (SCMD) v Ministerul Finanțelor Publice

(Case C-262/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Articles 2, 3(1) and 6 - Prohibition of discrimination based on age - Discrimination on grounds of membership of a socio-professional category or place of work - National legislation prohibiting, subject to certain limits, the combination of a pension with employment income from professional activity in the public sector - Automatic termination of the employment relationship or service relationship))

(2015/C 236/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Neamt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sindicatul Cadrelor Militare Disponibilizate în rezervă și în retragere (SCMD)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministerul Finanțelor Publice

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2(2) and 3(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation do not apply to national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that provides for automatic termination of employment relationships or service relationships of public sector employees benefitting from a pension that is higher than the gross average income who have not opted for continuing that employment relationship or service relationship within a specified time.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 8, 2019. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 

________________ 

No. 3D18-1287 

Lower Tribunal No. 15-2333 

________________ 

Cristina Suarez, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, 

Appellee. 

 An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, 

Jr., Judge. 

 Marin, Eljaiek, Lopez & Martinez, and Steven E. Gurian and David F. Garcia, 

for appellant. 

 Hinshaw & Culbertson, and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee. 

 

Before SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ., and LEBAN, Senior Judge. 

 PER CURIAM. 

On Partial Concession of Error 
2 

 Cristina Suarez (the “Insured”) appeals a final judgment awarding the 

defendant, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (the “Insurer”), attorney’s fees 

as the prevailing party in a circuit court lawsuit. We affirm as to entitlement to fees, 

as the Insurer’s proposal for settlement complied with section 768.79, Florida 

Statutes (2018), and the Florida Supreme Court’s holdings in Kuhajda v. Borden 

Dairy Co. of Alabama, LLC, 202 So. 3d 391, 395-96 (Fla. 2016). 

 We reject the Insured’s argument that her separate count for declaratory relief 

(voluntarily dismissed on the first day of trial) was a claim for purely equitable relief 

that invalidated the Insurer’s proposal for settlement. The trial court correctly 

determined that the “real issue” in the case was a claim for breach of contract and 

money damages. See Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co. v. Javellana, 238 So. 3d 372, 

376-77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). 

 Based on the Insurer’s limited and proper concession of error, we reverse and 

remand that portion of the final judgment fixing the amount of attorney’s fees to be 

awarded to the Insurer. On remand, the Insurer shall only recover those attorney’s 

fees incurred and actually paid or payable to its attorneys by the Insurer, from service 

of the 2016 proposal for settlement through the date of the order granting entitlement 

to fees. See § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); Reliance Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Ill. v. 

Booher, 166 So. 2d 222, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964) (applying dictionary definition of 

“incurred”). 
3 

 The final judgment is affirmed as to the Insurer’s entitlement to attorney’s 

fees, and (pursuant to the Insurer’s limited concession of error) reversed and 

remanded as to the amount of such fees to be awarded to the Insurer.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35910-35911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-560-801]


Melamine Institution Dinnerware Products From Indonesia: Notice 
of Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Katherine Johnson, 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4136 or (202) 482-4929, respectively.

SUMMARY: On March 23, 1998, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register (63 FR 13837) a notice 
announcing the initiation of an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on melamine institutional dinnerware products 
from Indonesia, covering the period August 22, 1996, through January 
31, 1998. This review has now been rescinded as a result of the 
withdrawal of the request for administrative review by the interested 
party.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 27, 1998, the Department received a request from the 
American Melamine Institutional Tableware Association (AMITA), the 
petitioner in the original investigation, and its member companies, 
Carlisle Food Service Products and Prolon, Inc., to conduct an 
administrative review of its entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b) of 
the Department's regulations. The period of review is August 22, 1996, 
through January 31, 1998. On March 23, 1998, the Department published 
in the Federal Register (63 FR 13837) a notice announcing the 
initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
melamine institutional dinnerware products from Indonesia, covering the 
period August 22, 1996, through January 31, 1998.

Termination of Review

    On June 16, 1998, we received a timely request for withdrawal of 
the request for administrative review from AMITA and its member 
companies.

[[Page 35911]]

Because there were no other requests for administrative review from any 
other interested party, in accordance with section 351.213(d) of the 
Department's regulations, we have rescinded this administrative review.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675) and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: June 25, 1998.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-17533 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P