alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.66 MB)
 
 #DLALandandMaritime #DSCC #ActiveShooterExercise news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.66 MB)
 
 #DLALandandMaritime #DSCC #ActiveShooterExercise news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.66 MB)
 
 #DLALandandMaritime #DSCC #ActiveShooterExercise news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.66 MB)
 
 #DLALandandMaritime #DSCC #ActiveShooterExercise news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2016106EN.01000702.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v European Commission, Lagardère SCA, Wendel

(Case C-514/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Merger of undertakings in the book publishing market - Decision adopted following the annulment of a decision approving the purchaser of certain assets for lack of independence of an agent - Article 266 TFEU - Enforcement of the judgment ordering annulment - Subject matter of proceedings - Legal basis for the decision at issue - Retroactive effect of that decision - Independence of the purchaser of the assets sold vis-à-vis the seller))

(2016/C 106/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, O. Fréget and L. Eskenazi, avocats)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and B. Mongin, acting as Agents), Lagardère SCA (represented by: A. Winckler, F. de Bure, J.-B. Pinçon and L. Bary, avocats), Wendel (represented by: M. Trabucchi, F. Gordon, A. Gosset-Grainville, avocats, and C. Renner, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, Lagardère SCA and Wendel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, Lagardère SCA and Wendel.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---
No. 10-6060.

#### John P. Dunbar, Petitioner v. Hawaii.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1063,

178 L. Ed. 2d 877,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 985.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1067, 131 S. Ct. 646, 178 L. Ed. 2d 487, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9268.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gregory D. Frost, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Able Energy Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

February 16, 2006



                        /s/ GREGORY D. FROST
                        --------------------
                        GREGORY D. FROST
                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                                       21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          62,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,023,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                    92,091
<INVENTORY>                                  2,272,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,613,735
<PP&E>                                       7,681,187
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,310,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,254,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,628,136
<BONDS>                                      1,500,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       416,997
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,296,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,254,541
<SALES>                                     21,536,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,536,430
<CGS>                                       14,258,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,258,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,021,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                   766,505
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,254,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,254,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiger Telematics,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form [10-Q] for the period  ending  September  30 , 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  officer of the
Company hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  that  based on their  knowledge  and
belief:  1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of  operations  of the Company as of and for the periods  covered in
the Report.



/S/ Michael W, Carrender
----------------------------------------------
Michael W, Carrender,  Chief Executive Officer



/S/ Michael W, Carrender
----------------------------------------------
Michael W. Carrender, Chief Financial Officer



May 3, 2004
No. 10-7640.

#### Juan Carlos Angulo-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 955,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 372.

178 L. Ed. 2d 788,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 1287.
EIS International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
------------------------------------------------------


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
         SUBSIDIARIES                                         INCORPORATION
<S>                                                    <C>
EIS Leasing Corporation                                Delaware
EIS Leasing of Delaware, Inc.                          Delaware
EIS International Services Corp.                       Virginia
Electronic Information Systems Limited                 United Kingdom
EIS Limited                                            United Kingdom
Electronic Information Systems International, Inc.     Delaware
EIS Foreign Sales Corporation                          U.S. Virgin Islands (St. Thomas)
EIS Italia, Sr. L                                      Italy
Surefind Information, Inc.                             Delaware
Cybernetics Systems International Corp.                Delaware
</TABLE>
#### *State, Respondent, v. Bryson, Petitioner,*

No. 92007-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45758-0-II, July 7, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1040. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-5789
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALVARO MARIO CAYCEDO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-586) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Michael P. O'Connell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Preston Strom, Jr., UnitedStates Attorney, Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alvaro Caycedo appeals from a district court sentence for escape from a prison camp. Counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Caycedo was notified of his right to file an additional brief, and he has not done so. We affirm. Caycedo's counsel claims on appeal that the district court erred in finding that prison camps were not sufficiently similar tocommunity centers or halfway houses such that the offense level reduction provided by United States Sentencing Commission, Sentencing Guidelines , § 2P1.1(b)(3) (Nov. 1994), should apply. We find no error in the district court's determination. See, e.g. , United States v. Stalbaum , 63 F.3d 537, 540 (7th Cir. 1995). Further, in accordance with the requirements of Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and have found no non-frivolous basis for appeal. Therefore, we affirm the district court sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petitionbe filed but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in3 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# DLA Director visits, praises employees at DLA Disposition Services

/ Published March 30, 2016
Battle Creek, Michigan,
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000058 24-FEB-2016 07:52 AM
No. 09-10788.

#### Rafael Pileta Colman, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1124, 131 S. Ct. 851,

178 L. Ed. 2d 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9819.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 389, 178 L. Ed. 2d 67, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6204.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, David C. Milholm, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Double Eagle PetroleumCo.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ David C. MilholmDavid C. Milholm, Chief Financial Officer
No. D-2584.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Michael Wayne Ryan, Jr.

562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630,

178 L. Ed. 2d 458,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9029.

November 15, 2010.

Michael Wayne Ryan, Jr., of Bowie, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,093,224
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         161,524
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               666,690
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 32,299,450
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,698,814
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,684,817
<LOANS>                                     43,394,575
<ALLOWANCE>                                    286,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,957,054
<DEPOSITS>                                  71,892,563
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,019,002
<LONG-TERM>                                  9,200,000
<COMMON>                                     1,311,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,592,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              91,957,054
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                961,326
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              593,949
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                53,563
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,608,838
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             659,631
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             822,144
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          786,694
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                758,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,416
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      95,247
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,247
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.59
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,030,419
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                115,615
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               310,157
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   33,335
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,070
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              286,892
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           286,892
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 10-6466.

#### Harold John Holmes, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 989,

178 L. Ed. 2d 818,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 541.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 433, 178 L. Ed. 2d 336, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8308.