alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA employee, Army Reserve pilot flies newest Army Chinook

/ Published Dec. 21, 2015
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
Phillip Brashear, who is a weapons systems program manager for Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, and an Army Chief Warrant Officer 4 and pilot in the U.S. Army Reserves, graduated from the two-month CH-47F Aviator Qualifications/Instructor Pilot (Transition) Course at Fort Rucker, Alabama, Dec. 15, 2015.   

He now flies the Army’s newest generation of digitized CH-47F Chinook helicopters when serving with the Army Reserves.  This computerized aircraft has the newest technical and digital upgrades and is capable of being programmed to fly a route without pilot assistance, Brashear said. 

Chinooks are considered the workhorse of Army helicopters and have been heavily used by the military since the 1960s in an array of missions including transportation of supplies and equipment, artillery and troops on and off the battlefield; medical evacuation; aircraft recovery; parachute drops; and search and rescue.  They are used by state and local governments for disaster relief, fire-fighting and transporting heavy equipment.

Brashear said the CH-47F Chinook has a triple hook system, providing stability to large external loads or even multiple loads at once. Multiple external loads can be delivered to three separate destinations in one sortie. “The central hook is rated to carry up to 12,000kg and the other two hooks 16,534 pounds each. Large external loads, then, such as a 155 millimeter Howitzer, can be transported at speeds up to 260km/h using the triple-hook load configuration,” he said.

The unit cost of a CH-47F is $37.94 million, according to the U.S. Department of Defense. The CH-47F can reach speeds greater than 175 mph and transport payloads weighing more than 21,000 pounds. Chinook helicopters were first introduced in 1962, and this is the sixth Chinook type designed for the U.S. Army, said Brashear.  Since then 1,179 of the aircraft have been built, he said.
# C_2013215EN.01001402.xml

| 27.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/14

---

Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)

(Case T-267/13)

2013/C 215/19

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda (Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 2295/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the appeal brought by the applicant, it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community trade mark No 9 093 733‘BAUSS’ (word); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 2295/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the appeal brought by the applicant, it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community trade mark No 9 093 733‘BAUSS’ (word);

| — | order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BAUSS’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 093 733

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative marks with word elements ‘BASS 3 TRES’, ‘BASS 10 DIEZ’ and ‘BASS 20 VEINTE’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
| state | Paratyphoid Fever | Typhoid Fever |
|-------|-------------------|---------------|
| AK    | 1                 | 0             |
| AL    | 1                 | 0             |
| AR    | 0                 | 0             |
| AZ    | 1                 | 4             |
| CA    | 17                | 46            |
| CO    | 0                 | 3             |
| CT    | 2                 | 2             |
| DC    | 0                 | 0             |
| DE    | 0                 | 0             |
| FL    | 1                 | 2             |
| GA    | 1                 | 1             |
| HI    | 0                 | 3             |
| IA    | 1                 | 0             |
| ID    | 0                 | 0             |
| IL    | 4                 | 3             |
| IN    | 0                 | 0             |
| KS    | 0                 | 0             |
| KY    | 0                 | 1             |
| LA    | 0                 | 0             |
| MA    | 3                 | 4             |
| MD    | 1                 | 7             |
| ME    | 0                 | 0             |
| MI    | 0                 | 1             |
| MN    | 1                 | 2             |
| MO    | 0                 | 3             |
| MS    | 0                 | 0             |
| MT    | 0                 | 0             |
| NC    | 0                 | 2             |
| ND    | 0                 | 0             |
| NE    | 0                 | 0             |
| NH    | 0                 | 0             |
| NJ    | 0                 | 8             |
| NM    | 0                 | 0             |
| NV    | 0                 | 0             |
| NY    | 6                 | 20            |
| OH    | 0                 | 3             |
| OK    | 0                 | 2             |
| OR    | 0                 | 1             |
| PA    | 0                 | 6             |
| RI    | 0                 | 0             |
| SC    | 0                 | 2             |
| SD    | 0                 | 0             |
| TN    | 2                 | 1             |
| TX    | 1                 | 11            |
| UT    | 0                 | 0             |
| VA    | 2                 | 9             |
| VT    | 0                 | 0             |
| WA    | 2                 | 10            |
| WI    | 1                 | 0             |
| WV    | 0                 | 0             |
| WY    | 0                 | 0             |
|       | 48                | 157           |
No. 10-6849.

#### In re Danny McGleachie, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1060, 131 S. Ct. 665,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9248.

178 L. Ed. 2d 517,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiger Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/S/  Michael W. Carrender
-------------------------
Michael W. Carrender,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

November ___, 2005
#### *State, Respondent, v. Schumacher, Petitioner,*

No. 91679-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 69449-9-1, April 6, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1042. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
No. 10-7567.

#### P. B. Griffin, IV, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1155, 131 S. Ct. 949,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 473.

178 L. Ed. 2d 784,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.13 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.13 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.13 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.13 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of *

Nebraska, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-4092SI

_____________

William R. Howell, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: April 13, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM, District Judge. *

_____________

PER CURIAM.

William R. Howell appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment

affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Howell supplemental security income

benefits. After careful review of the parties' briefs and the administrative record, we

conclude substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner that Howell

is not disabled for Social Security purposes. We affirm for the reasons stated in the

district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT (31)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gregory A. Knapp, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Empire District Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 19, 2010

By:

/s/ Gregory A. Knapp


Name:

Gregory A. KnappTitle:

Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
# SOI
No. 10-5590.

#### Collie Lee Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1066, 131 S. Ct. 642,

178 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9409.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 956.
EXHIBIT 32.1
   
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 /s/ Corey M. Horowitz
 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
 August 14, 2013
Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances

Federal-Tribal Relationship

The United States has a unique legal and political relationship with Indian tribes, 

as provided in the Constitution of the United States, treaties, and federal statutes.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is committed to 

working with federally recognized tribal governments on a government-togovernment basis, and strongly supports and respects sovereignty and selfdetermination for tribal governments in the United States.

The Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances focuses on activities that 

reflect the agency’s role in helping to ensure that American Indian/Alaska 

Native (AI/AN) communities receive public health services that keep them 

safe and healthy. 

Our Mission 

Our mission is to affirm the government-to-government relationship between 

CDC and AI/AN tribes by advancing connections, providing expertise, and 

increasing resources to improve tribal communities’ public health.

Our Role 

• Principal advisor to policy-level officials about AI/AN public health issues

• Principal contact for all public health activities affecting AI/AN communities

• Coordinator for CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry (ATSDR) programs and policies that benefit or affect AI/AN tribes

Our Work

• Serve as CDC’s principal point of contact for tribes and tribal-serving

organizations (TSOs)

• Manage the CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee

• Connect tribes and tribal-serving organizations to CDC and ATSDR programs

• Develop communication and information resource for tribes and TSOs

• Support and collaborate with TSOs and public health partners to improve

tribal public health capacity

• Educate about tribal health issues, policies, activities, and strategies, while

serving as a principal advisor to CDC leaders and staff

• Guide and coordinate CDC’s tribal-related partnerships and activities with the

US Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies

More Information

Contact the Office of Tribal Affairs and Strategic Alliances at tribalsupport@cdc.gov

or visit www.cdc.gov/tribal
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7604

STEVEN J. KEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; NICHOLAS COUNTY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.

(CA-98-1108-5)

Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven J. Key, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven J. Key appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Key v. West Virginia, No. CA-98-1108-5 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### *Collection Grp., LLC, Respondent, v. Cook et al., Petitioners,*

No. 91696-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32020-1-III, April 9, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 1048. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             EXHIBIT 11.1
                                    ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
                                Computation of per Share Net Income as
                                   Disclosed in Item 13 of Form 10-K

                                       Five years ended June 30,

                                  2009           2008           2007           2006           2005
                              ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Computation of net income
     per share:

         BASIC
         Weighted average
         number of primary
         shares outstanding      2,107,643      2,079,734      2,048,626      2,012,761      2,021,234
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Net income ................   $  2,733,240   $  3,421,869   $  2,544,720   $  1,558,016   $    978,920
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Per share-basic ...........   $       1.30   $       1.65   $       1.24   $        .77   $        .48
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

         DILUTED
         Weighted average
         number of primary
         shares outstanding      2,113,798      2,103,836      2,077,664      2,049,455      2,043,208
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

         Net effect of
         dilutive stock
         options based on
         treasury stock
         method ...........          6,155         24,102         29,038         36,694         21,974
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Net income ................   $  2,733,240   $  3,421,869   $  2,544,720   $  1,558,016   $    978,920
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Per share-diluted .........   $       1.29   $       1.63   $       1.23   $        .76   $        .48
                              ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

                                                  30
</TABLE>
#### *State, Respondent, v. Krona, Petitioner,*

No. 92037-1.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71810-0-I, July 27, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1007. *Denied*January 6, 2016.