Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 131 /Thursday, July 9, 1998 /Rules and Regulations 37069

1 Implementation of the Pay Telephone

Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of

the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket

No. 96–128, Report and Order, 61 FR 52307

(October 7, 1996), 11 FCC Rcd 20,541 (1996),

(‘‘Report and Order’’); Order on Reconsideration, 61

FR 65341 (December 12, 1996), 11 FCC Rcd 21,233

(1996) (’’Order on Reconsideration’’) (together the

‘‘Payphone Orders’’).

PART 588—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, under the authority of 5

U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 588 is removed.

Stanley L. Kelley, Jr.,

Director, Equal Employment Complaints and

Compliance.

[FR Doc. 98–18226 Filed 7–8–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–6122–4]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency

Plan National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Deletion of Anaconda

Aluminum/Milgo Electronics Site from

the National Priorities List.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) Region 4 announces the

deletion of the Anaconda Aluminum/

Milgo Electronics Corporation Site in

Miami, Florida, from the National

Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is

codified as Appendix B of the National

Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution

Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR Part

300, which EPA promulgated pursuant

to Section 105 of the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act

(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. EPA

and the State of Florida Department of

Environmental Protection (FDEP) have

determined that the Site poses no

significant threat to public health or the

environment and therefore, no further

response pursuant to CERCLA is

appropriate.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 9, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information

on this Site is available at two

information repositories located at:

North Central Library, 10750 SW 211th

Street, Miami, Florida 33189, (305) 693–

4541 and U.S EPA Record Center, 61

Forsyth Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303,

(404) 562–8881.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim

McGuire, South Site Management

Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta,

Georgia 30303, (404)562–8911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Anaconda Aluminum/Milgo Electronics

Corporation Site in Miami, Florida, is

being deleted from the NPL.

A Notice of Intent to Delete for this

site was published on March 23, 1998

(63 FR 13816). The closing date for

comments on the Notice of Intent to

Delete was April 22, 1998. EPA received

no comments and therefore did not

prepare a Responsiveness Summary.

The EPA identifies sites which appear

to present a significant risk to public

health, welfare, or the environment and

it maintains the NPL as the list of those

sites. Sites on the NPL may be subject

of Hazardous Substance Response Trust

Fund (Fund-) financed remedial actions.

Any site deleted from the NPL remains

eligible for Fund-financed remedial

actions in the unlikely event that

conditions at the site warrant such

action. Section 301.425(e)(3) of the NCP

states that Fund-financed actions may

be taken at sites deleted from the NPL

in the unlikely event that conditions at

the site warrant such action. Deletion of

a site from the NPL does not affect

responsible party liability or impede

agency efforts to recover costs

associated with response efforts.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

substances, Hazardous waste,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, Water supply.

Dated: June 25, 1998.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA

Region 4.

40 CFR part 300 is amended as

follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp. p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp. p.193.

Appendix B—[Amended]

2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing the Site

‘‘Anaconda Aluminum Co./Milgo

Electronics, Miami, Florida’’.

[FR Doc. 98–18074 Filed 7–8–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CC Docket No. 96–128; DA 98–1101]

Pay Telephone Reclassification and

Compensation Provisions

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for waiver.

SUMMARY: On June 10, 1998, the

Common Carrier Bureau (‘‘Bureau’’)

granted limited waivers of certain

requirements relating to the provision of

payphone-specific coding digits,

established earlier in this proceeding, to

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,

Pacific Bell, and Nevada Bell

(collectively, ‘‘SBC’’). These limited

waivers extend the waiver period for

certain technical problems which were

included in limited waivers previously

granted by the Bureau.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 9, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg

Lipscomb, Formal Complaints and

Information Branch, Enforcement

Division, Common Carrier Bureau. (202)

418–0960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A toll-free

call transmitted by a local exchange

carrier (LEC) to an interexchange carrier

(IXC) carries with it billing information

codes, called automatic number

identification (ANI), supplied by the

LEC that assists the IXC in properly

billing the call. Currently, however, not

all payphone calls carry the payphonespecific coding digits necessary to

identify the calls as payphone calls,

making per-call tracking and blocking

more difficult.

In the Payphone Orders,1 61 FR 52307

(October 7, 1996) and 61 FR 65341

(December 12, 1996), the Commission

imposed a requirement that LECs

provide payphone-specific coding digits

to payphone service providers (PSPs),

and that PSPs provide those digits from

their payphones before the PSPs can

receive per-call compensation from IXCs

for subscriber 800 and access code calls.

The Commission also stated that, to be

eligible for per-call compensation

beginning October 7, 1997, payphones

were required to transmit specific

payphone coding digits as a part of their