alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Workforce resiliency website launches; provides tools, resources to help employees

/ Published March 28, 2016

A new workforce-resiliency webpage is now available, providing another resource for DLA employees and their families to use in developing the behaviors and skills to cope with today’s challenging work-life environment. 

The Workforce Resiliency website offers definitions to assist in understanding the DLA resiliency model and its supporting pillars as well as links to training, local field activity resiliency programs and DLA activities that assist in building resiliency.

“We promised our employees the tools and resources needed to help them become more resilient. This website is one of those tools,” said Renee Roman, DLA chief of staff. “As we go forward, we’ll add more links, articles and useful videos. We hope that in the very near future it will be a ‘one-stop shop’ for DLA employees seeking to know more about resiliency. Our aim is to make it easy for them to find training, programs and information needed to increase workforce and personal resiliency across the agency,” 

Resiliency is an agency core value and, according to DLA Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, a vital part of the foundation of all DLA actions and decisions made to support the agency workforce, customers and stakeholders. Fortifying workforce resiliency is also part of Goal 2: People and Culture of the DLA Strategic Plan, 2015-2022.

“Dealing with stress and adversity in healthy and productive ways is really the cornerstone of what we mean by ‘resiliency,’ and Lt. Gen. Busch has committed to helping the DLA workforce strengthen its resiliency in the face of personal and professional stressors — not only because it’s the right thing to do for our people, but also because a more resilient workforce is more engaged, productive and high performing,” said Brad Bunn, director, DLA Human Resources. “I think the DLA Workforce Resiliency website is a foundational part of the support available to the DLA workforce.”
**Exhibit 32**



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (The "Registrant") that
the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the
Registrant for such period.

|      |                 |  |     |                                                                                                                      
|----- | --------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | August 14, 2003 |  | By: | /s/ William L. Stephens 
William L. Stephens
President and Chief Executive Officer
*(Duly Authorized Representative)*
|     
|     
|     
|Date: | August 14, 2003 |  | By: | /s/ Lawrence Safarek
Lawrence Safarek
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.78 MB)
 
 habitat news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.78 MB)
 
 habitat news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.78 MB)
 
 habitat news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.78 MB)
 
 habitat news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of June 22, 29, July 6, and 13, 1998.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of June 22

Thursday, June 25
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed).
2:00 p.m.--Briefing on EEO Program (Public Meeting).

Week of June 29--Tentative

Tuesday, June 30
10:00 a.m.--Meeting with Commonwealth Edison (Public Meeting) (Contact: 
Stewart Richards, 301-415-1395).
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed).
2:00 p.m.--Briefing on Performance Assessment Progress in HLW, LLW, and 
ADMP (Public Meeting) (Contact: Norman Eisenberg, 301-415-7285).

Week of July 6--Tentative

Thursday, July 9
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed).

Week of July 13--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 13.
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (Recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-
1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:

http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition, distribution of 
this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are 
interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule 
electronically, please send an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2933361e302c3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f88f9590b8968a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afcbc4d8efc1ddcc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b2f203c0b253928652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16827 Filed 6-19-98; 4:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

                        Orion Diversified Services, Inc.;
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Orion Diversified Services, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30,  2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of Certified
     Services, Inc.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/     Irwin Pearl
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/     Thomas Regan
Chief Financial Officer


Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
No. 10-83.

#### Gary E. Peel, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1178, 131 S. Ct. 994,

178 L. Ed. 2d 825,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 867.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 763.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.31  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT    
    


        This AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of the 9th day of December, 2004, by and between Tyco
International Ltd. (the "Parent") and Richard J. Meelia (the "Executive"). 


W
I T N E S S E T H 


        WHEREAS,
Parent and Executive entered into a Retention Agreement effective as of February 14, 2002 (the "Retention Agreement") to encourage Executive to remain in the employ of
Parent and to ensure the continued availability of his advice and counsel, and to assure that he would not provide services for competing business in accordance with the terms thereof; and 



        WHEREAS,
the Retention Agreement provides for certain benefits to Executive in the event that his employment with Parent is terminated, including certain benefits if his employment is
terminated for any reason other than for Cause at any time subsequent to February 28, 2005 and prior to June 1, 2005; and 


        WHEREAS,
Parent considers it essential to the best interests of the shareholders and Parent to ensure Executive's continued employment with Parent through December 31, 2005, to
assist with succession planning; and 


        WHEREAS,
Executive recognizes the importance of the confidentiality, non-solicitation, noncompetition and other covenants in the Retention Agreement, and acknowledges that he
would be subject to these covenants following December 31, 2005, as indicated in the Retention Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS,
Parent and Executive have agreed to amend the Retention Agreement to extend the June 1, 2005 date referenced above to December 31, 2005. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Parent and Executive hereby agree as follows: 



        1.     Section 4(g)
of the Retention Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the date "June 1, 2005" in the first sentence thereof and replacing it with
"December 31, 2005". 


        2.     Executive
acknowledges and agrees that, as set forth in the provisions of Section 4(g) of the Retention Agreement, the receipt of all items enumerated in clauses
(i), (ii) and (iii) thereof is conditioned upon his compliance with the covenants set forth in Sections 7, 8, 9 and 11 of the Retention Agreement. 


        3.     Except
as specifically modified in Section 1 above, the terms of the Retention Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parent and the Executive have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written. 



	 	 	TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  EDWARD D. BREEN      

	 	 	Name:	 	Edward D. Breen

	 	 	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	

 	
 	
EXECUTIVE:
	

 	
 	

/s/  RICHARD J. MEELIA      
 Richard J. Meelia




2











QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT
No. 10-6928.

#### Montey Allen Luckey, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 908,

178 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 224.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Filed 1/29/16 P. v. M ontes CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FERNANDO MONTES,

Defendant and Appellant. B265326

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA107197)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Jack P. Hunt, Judge. Affirmed.

Christopher Love, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for
Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * * * * *2

Fernando Montes appeals an order denying his petition for resentencing
pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18, enacted by Proposition 47. Pursuant to
People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ), appellant’s counsel filed an
opening brief requesting this court review the record and determine whether any
arguable issues exist on appeal. We have reviewed the entire record and find no
arguable issue. We affirm.

BACKGROUND
On August 26, 2014, a felony complaint was filed alleging appellant

committed one count of felony possession of a forged seal resembling the Great

Seal of the State of California (Pen. Code, § 472 ; count 1 ) and one count of

misdemeanor driving without a valid license (Veh. Code, § 12500, subd. (a) ; count

2 ). On September 8, 2014, appellant pled no contest to count 1 , and he was placed
on three yea rs of formal probation. C ount 2 was dismissed. On December 11,
2014, appellan t admitted he violated the terms of his probation and was again
placed on probation with modified terms and conditions. On March 3, 2015,
appellant filed a petition for recall of his sentence and resentencing pursuant to

Penal Code section 1170.18. The c ourt denied the petition on May 21, 2015, and
appellant timely appealed.

DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent appellant o n this appeal. After review of
the record, appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed an opening brief asking this

court to re view the record independently pursuant to Wende, supra

, 25 Cal.3d at
page 441. On October 16 , 2015 , we advised appellant he had 30 days to submit
any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. Appellant did not file a
supplemental brief.3

We have ex amined the entire record. We are satisfied no arguable issues
exist and appellant’s counsel has fully satisfied his responsibilities under Wende

. ( Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 279

- 284; Wende, supra

, 25 Cal.3d at

p. 441; see People v. Kelly (2006 ) 40 Cal.4th 106, 123

- 124.)

DISPOSITION

The court’s order is affirmed.

FLIER, J.

WE CONCUR:

BIGELOW, P. J.

GRIMES, J.
No. 10-6996.

#### Clementine Newman, Petitioner v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water.

562 U.S. 1113, 131 S. Ct. 831,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9664,

178 L. Ed. 2d 565,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-7758.

#### Arnold L. Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 966,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 36.

178 L. Ed. 2d 795,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 434.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2658 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2658

To amend the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 to provide 
 for the inclusion of certain workers in the exemption from numerical 
          limitations on H-2B workers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2019

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 to provide 
 for the inclusion of certain workers in the exemption from numerical 
          limitations on H-2B workers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Fishing and Seafood 
Business Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN WORKERS IN EXEMPTION FROM NUMERICAL 
              LIMITATIONS ON H-2B WORKERS.

    Section 14006 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 
(Public Law 108-287) is amended to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 14006.  The numerical limitation contained in section 
214(g)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(g)(1)(B)) shall not apply to any nonimmigrant alien issued a visa 
or otherwise provided status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b)) who is employed (or has received 
an offer of employment)--
            ``(1) on a commercial fishing vessel or shrimp trawler; or
            ``(2) in the processing of--
                    ``(A) fish or fishery products; or
                    ``(B) baitfish.
        Terms used in this section have the meanings given such terms 
        in section 123.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices 

# Order

April 16, 2010

140297 & (62) 140299

In re INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS.

_____________ _______________ _____________
GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 140297 COA: 284993 Grand Traverse CC: MEIJER, INC., 08-026516-PZ Respondent-Appellee,

and

DICKINSON WRIGHT EMPLOYEES, Respondents-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

In re INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS.

_____________ _______________ _____________
GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 140299 COA: 284993 Grand Traverse CC: MEIJER, INC., 08-026516-PZ Respondent-Appellant,

and

DICKINSON WRIGHT EMPLOYEES, Respondents-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The applications for leave to a ppeal the November 19, 2009 judgment ofI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 16, 2010

d0413 2

the Court of Appeals are considered. We DIRECT the parties to submit supplemental briefs, within 35 days of th e date of this order, addressing the effect, if any, of Citizens
United v Federal Election Commission , 558 US ___; 130 S Ct 876; 175 L Ed 2d 753 (2010), on this case. The applications for leave to appeal remain pending.

W EAVER , J., would grant leave to appeal and then direct the parties to submit supplemental briefs, within 35 days of the date of this order, addressing the effect, if any,
of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission , 558 US ___; 130 S Ct 876; 175 L Ed 2d 753 (2010), on this case.
Exhibit 10.7 Peck Severance Amendment


Exhibit 10.7






AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR POST-TERMINATION BENEFITS






Gap Inc. and Art Peck entered into an Agreement For Post-Termination Benefits (“Agreement”), dated May 31, 2012, which provides eligibility for post-termination benefits in the event of certain terminations that occur prior to February 13, 2015.   By this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby extended to apply to certain terminations, as described in the Agreement, prior to February 13, 2018.  Except as provided in this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in effect.  




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Art Peck_____________            Date: May 29, 2014          
Art Peck


THE GAP, INC.


/s/ Glenn Murphy__________________        Date: June 4, 2014          
By:  Glenn Murphy
       Chairman and CEO
#### MLM LLC, Appellant, v Sotirios Karamouzis, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 620]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 15, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

An owner/shareholder is not individually hable for the torts of a corporation unless it is established that he exercised complete dominion over the corporation alleged to have committed the wrong *(Brito v DILP Corp.,*282 AD2d 320 [2001]). We reject plaintiff’s claim that defendant, a principal of the restaurant corporation, engaged in allegedly tortious conduct, *162for which he should be held individually responsible. Such conduct amounts, at most, to nonfeasance, for which defendant is not liable *(Michaels v Lispenard Holding Corp.,*11 AD2d 12, 14 [I960]). Furthermore, plaintiff failed to demonstrate the requisite elements of a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ.