Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search

		Submit


Transportation Safety


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Automated Speed Camera Enforcement										Related Pages
										On This Page
			Effectiveness and UseRecent or Current LegislationCosts and Time to ImplementOther Issues and ResourcesHistoryReferences
A speed camera is a form of automated enforcement of traffic safety laws. Speed cameras photograph a vehicle’s license plate if the driver is speeding, and the vehicle owner or driver is sent a ticket.1 Mobile speed cameras are often used to cover multiple road segments, unlike red light cameras, which are used only at intersections. Automated speed camera enforcement should be used to aid traditional enforcement efforts or in locations where traffic stops are impractical or unsafe.1
Effectiveness and Use of Automated Speed Camera Enforcement
The relationship between driving speed and the risk of a crash and/or fatality is well established.1,2 In 2019, 26% of all motor vehicle fatalities occurred in crashes in which at least one driver was speeding.3 In the same year, results from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Crash Report Sampling System, a sample of police-reported crashes, found speeding was involved in 12% of crashes resulting in injuries/fatalities and 9% of property-damage-only crashes.2
Increased travel speeds as a result of increasing speed limits have a detrimental impact on fatality rates.2 One study analyzed 1982–1989 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data to estimate the impact of the speed limit being raised from 55 to 65 mph on rural interstates in many states during 1987–1988. This study found an increase in the fatality risk corresponding to approximately one rural interstate fatality per day in 1989 being attributable to the increased speed limit.4 Another study analyzed FARS data and estimated that 33,000 traffic fatalities would have been prevented if maximum speed limits had stayed the same from 1995–2013 instead of increasing.5
Automated speed camera enforcement is effective in reducing speed and speed-related crashes. In a Cochrane review of studies through 2010 evaluating speed cameras, all studies measuring speed or speeding saw reductions when the cameras were present.6 All studies in the Cochrane review measuring crashes also showed reductions when the cameras were present.6 More recent research has also found reductions in speeding or injury crashes when cameras were present.7,8 For example, a 2016 study reported on the results of a comprehensive evaluation of an automated speed camera enforcement program in Montgomery County, Maryland.8 The evaluation was conducted seven and a half years after the introduction of the speed cameras to residential streets and school zones. Relative to comparable sites without cameras, sites with cameras saw a decrease in mean speeds, a decrease in the likelihood that a driver was driving at more than ten miles per hour above the speed limit, and a reduction in the likelihood of a crash resulting in an incapacitating or fatal injury.8 In a phone survey of drivers in the community, 95% were aware of the speed cameras, and 76% of those aware had reduced their speeds because of the cameras.8
Recent or Current Legislation by State
You can visit the automated enforcement laws by stateexternal icon web page on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s website for up-to-date information on automated speed camera enforcement by state.9
Costs of Automated Speed Camera Enforcement and Time to Implement
Camera equipment may be purchased, leased, or operated by a vendor.1 Most jurisdictions work with vendors to install cameras, process images, and issue citations.1 Costs of implementation depend on equipment type, program characteristics, and vendor negotiations. Vendor payments are made either on a set monthly basis or based on the number of citations.1 Several studies have found net cost benefits to society for the use of speed cameras.1
It generally requires up to nine months for full automated speed camera enforcement implementation after any relevant legislation has been enacted.1
Other Issues and Resources
In a report for the Governors Highway Safety Association, equitably implemented and transparent automated enforcement was recommended as a strategy to advance racial equity in traffic enforcement.10
You can read Chapter 3, Section 2.1 of NHTSA’s Countermeasures that Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide for State Highway Safety Officespdf iconexternal icon (Tenth Edition, 2020) to learn more about the topics above or other issues related to speed camera enforcement, such as variation in state laws, differential public acceptance (e.g., higher support of use around school zones), positive or negative spillover effects, average speed over distance enforcement, and enforcement thresholds.1
You can read the RAND Corporation’s final reports for MV PICCS 1.0/2.0external icon and MV PICCS 3.0external icon for more information about how effectiveness and costs were incorporated into the MV PICCS tool for this intervention.
History
Each state is responsible for setting its own maximum speed limit laws.2 In 1901, Connecticut was the first state to pass a law regulating the speed of motor vehicles.11 In 1973, a national maximum speed limit of 55 mph was established using restrictions on federal funding for states.2 However, speed limits have increased since the relaxation of the law in 1987 to allow for speed limits of up to 65 mph on rural interstates and the repeal of the law in 1995.2
The first speed cameras in the United States were installed in 1987 in the Peoria and Paradise Valley communities in Arizona.2 As of January 2022, 171 communities in 18 states and the District of Columbia use automated speed camera enforcement.12 See above for current legislation.
References
Venkatraman, V., Richard, C. M., Magee, K., & Johnson, K. (2021). *Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasures guide for State Highway Safety Offices*. (Report No. DOT HS 813 097). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-09/15100_Countermeasures10th_080621_v5_tag.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, & Highway Loss Data Institute. (2021). Speed. https://www.iihs.org/topics/speedexternal icon. Accessed on 1/27/2022.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2021). *Quick facts 2019*. (Report No. DOT HS 813 124). https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813124external icon
Baum, H. M., Wells, J. K., & Lund, A. K. (1991). The fatality consequences of the 65 mph speed limits, 1989. *Journal of Safety Reseach, 22*(4), 171–177. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002243759190027Sexternal icon
Farmer, C. M. (2017). Relationship of traffic fatality rates to maximum state speed limits. *Traffic Injury Prevention, 18*(4), 375–380. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2016.1213821external icon
Wilson, C., Willis, C., Hendrikz, J. K., Le Brocque, R., & Bellamy, N. (2010). Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths. *Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,*(11). https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004607.pub4/fullexternal icon
Kloeden, C., Mackenzie, J., & Hutchinson, T. (2018). *Analysis of crash data from safety camera intersections in South Australia*. (CASR143). Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure http://casr.adelaide.edu.au/publications/list/?id=1723external icon
Hu, W., & McCartt, A. T. (2016). Effects of automated speed enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland, on vehicle speeds, public opinion, and crashes. *Traffic Injury Prevention, 17 Suppl 1*, 53-58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2016.1189076external icon
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, & Highway Loss Data Institute. (2022). Automated enforcement laws. https://www.iihs.org/topics/red-light-running/automated-enforcement-lawsexternal icon. Accessed on 1/27/2022.
Kimley-Horn, & Governors Highway Safety Association. (2021). Equity in highway safety enforcement and engagement programspdf iconexternal icon. Governors Highway Safety Association
CT Humanities. (2020). Setting speed limits – today in history: May 21. https://connecticuthistory.org/setting-speed-limits-today-in-history-may-21/external icon. Accessed on 1/26/2022.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, & Highway Loss Data Institute. (2022). U.S. Communities using speed cameras. https://www.iihs.org/topics/speed/speed-camera-communitiesexternal icon. Accessed on 1/27/2022.Top of Page
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  February 28, 2022					Content source: 	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control homeTransportation Safety
Data and Resources for States and Tribesplus icon
LINCS Guide
State Data Linkage Systems
Cost Data and Prevention Policiesplus icon
Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS)plus icon
Intervention Fact Sheets
Intervention Glossary
Costs of Crash Deaths
Child Passenger Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
What Works: Strategies to Increase Car Seat and Booster Seat Use
Publications
Resources
Booster Seat Planning Guide
Seat Beltsplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Increase Restraint Use
Publications
Policy Impact
Teen Driversplus icon
Get the Facts
Parents Are the Key
GDL Planning Guide
Publications
Older Adult Driversplus icon
MyMobility Planplus icon
Resources
Spanish Resources
Related Pages
Medicines Risk Fact Sheet
Impaired Drivingplus icon
Get the Facts
State Fact Sheets
What Works: Strategies to Reduce or Prevent Alcohol-Impaired Driving
Increasing Alcohol Ignition Interlock Use
Publications
Distracted Driving
Pedestrian Safetyplus icon
Publications
Tribal Road Safetyplus icon
Get the Facts
Roadway to Safer Tribal Communities Fact Sheets
Best Practices Guide
Program Evaluation Guide
Publications
Motorcycle Safety
Bicycle Safetyplus icon
Publications
Global Road Safetyplus icon
Publications & Resources To receive email updates about this topic, enter your email address: Email Address			What's this?				Submit


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue