alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Salamea Wilson, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 902]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), dated August 18, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly rejected the defendant’s request for a downward departure from the presumptive risk level. A court determining a defendant’s risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) may not downwardly depart from the presumptive risk level unless the defendant first identifies, and proves by a preponderance of the evidence the facts in support of, “a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary (2006) *735(hereinafter Guidelines)]” *(People v Lathan,*129 AD3d 686, 687 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see People v Warren,*152 AD3d 551, 551 [2017]; Guidelines at 4). Here, the defendant failed to identify a proper mitigating factor *(see People v Warren,*152 AD3d at 551; *People v Rodriguez,*145 AD3d 489, 490 [2016]; *People v Roldan,*140 AD3d 411, 412 [2016]). Accordingly, there was no basis for a downward departure, and the court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender *(see People v Warren,*152 AD3d at 551).

Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
No. 10-7549.

#### James Lee Sills, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1155, 131 S. Ct. 948,

178 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 181.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 570.
# Partnership affirmed with Army Corps of Engineers visit to Troop Support

/ Published Dec. 9, 2015
PHILADELPHIA, 

Partnering to solve problems early was a key takeaway for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers logisticians who visited Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support in Philadelphia Dec. 3.The USACE group learned about DLA Troop Support’s various products and capabilities throughout its supply chains: Subsistence, Clothing and Textiles, Medical, Construction and Equipment, and Industrial Hardware.DLA Troop Support Deputy Director Richard Ellis welcomed the group and discussed opportunities for partnership between the two organizations.“There’s a lot of opportunity for partnering with our C&E supply chain with our [maintenance, repair and operations] contracts,” Ellis said.Marko Graham, C&E chief of executive agency and plans and integration office, explained the global presence of MRO contracts, along with other functions of the supply chain USACE may be able to take advantage of.“Reach out to us if there’s a seat at the planning table,” Graham said. “If we can be involved earlier, we’ll be able to help much better.In fiscal 2015, USACE sales with C&E were approximately $42.6 million, C&E Collective Customer Division Chief Kyle McCarthy said. MRO, metals and cable were among the top items and services DLA Troop Support provided.USACE logistics management specialist Tonga Hackett said the visit to Troop Support was very informative, particularly talking to the C&E and Medical supply chains.“We’re pretty much trying to see how we can better align ourselves with DLA, as well as learn from DLA and the way they’ve partnered with other services,” Hackett said.Closing out the visit, the group toured Clothing and Textiles’ flag room, which Hackett described as the “icing on the cake” of the visit.“The visit has been a great experience, we’ll be able to take this [information] back, talk to our other functions within [USACE], let them know how DLA functions, and how we can partner and better service each other,” Hackett said.
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory C. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/s/    GREGORY C. WALKERGregory C. Walker Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14,
2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We haveissued our reports dated May 9, 2007, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements and management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of Ennis, Inc. on Form 10-K forthe year ended February 28, 2007. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Ennis, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-43087,effective October 7, 1991, File No. 333-58963, effectiveJuly 13, 1998, File No. 333-38100, effective May 31,2000, File No. 333-44624, effective August 28, 2000, andFile No. 333-119845, effective October 20, 2004)./s/ GrantThornton LLP
#### People v Diamond M.

1st Dept: 140 AD3d 628 (Bronx)

denied 8/31/16 (Garcia, J.)
No. 10-7411.

#### Antedious Stowe, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 838,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9728.

178 L. Ed. 2d 569,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 277.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying Registration
Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001065423
<NAME> STEEL HEDDLE GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (168)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,062
<PP&E>                                          46,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,506
<BONDS>                                        143,656
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,590
<SALES>                                         53,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,860
<CGS>                                           40,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,054)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2015016EN.01001202.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/12

---

Order of the Court of 22 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg) — Mineralquelle Zurzach AG v Hauptzollamt Singen

(Case C-139/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common customs tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Classification of goods - Tariff heading 2202 10 00 - Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured - Tariff heading 2202 9010 11 - Fruit juice or vegetable juice diluted with water or aerated)

(2015/C 016/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mineralquelle Zurzach AG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Singen

Re:

The Combined Nomenclature contained in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 must be interpreted as meaning that a drink, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, consisting of inter alia water, sugar, concentrated orange, lemon, grape, pineapple, mandarin, nectarine and passion fruit juices, apricot and guava pulp, acidifier, a vitamin mix, natural and artificial flavouring, and which have a fruit juice content of 12 % comes under tariff subheading 2202 10 00 of that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.

---
# Princesses, Pirates and Porcupines unite in the quest for candy at the annual CDC Halloween Parade

/ Published Nov. 1, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Tenants of Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna lined the streets surrounding the Child Development Center and the installation fire station to hand out candy to approximately 120 ghouls, goblins, superheroes and princesses during the Halloween parade on Oct. 31.

The employees of the New Cumberland, Pa., installation donated candy and small toys to make the Halloween parade a special event for the children of the CDC. After making the rounds to collect candy, the final stop on the parade route was a meet and greet with the DLA Fire Department.

The annual parade is an event the entire installation looks forward to each year.
No. 10-6821.

#### Martin Edward Walters, Petitioner v. D. K. Sisto, Warden.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 800,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9567.

178 L. Ed. 2d 535,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-21074

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has moved for leave

to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rilwan was

mailed a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
**DAAN-46-02**

**Production Lot Testing (Contractor)**

(May 2017)

Production Lot Test (PLT)

1 EACH = 1 PLT 

Number of units to be tested =_______

For Testing: 

Inspection: Origin 

Acceptance: Destination 

FOB:  Destination

Ship To:  Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) listed on the “Issued By” block of this award.  Provide information copy to the Administering Contracting Officer if different than the PCO. 

Delivery Schedule:

____ Days:  Completion of Production Units

____ Days:  Government PLT Report Evaluation and Notification to Contractor 

____________________________________

____ Total Days ARO

(End of Notice)
**EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM          Wehave issued our report dated May 21, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Environmental TectonicsCorporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended February 23, 2007. We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of EnvironmentalTectonics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-131322, effective January 27,2006, File No. 333-65469, effective October 8, 1998 and File No. 2-92407, effective August 14,1984), Form S-3A (File No. 333-29083, effective July 2, 1997) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-29083,effective June 12, 1997 and File No. 33-42219, effective September 4, 1991)./s/Grant Thornton LLP
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (the Registrant) that the Quarterly Report of the Registrant
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ William L. Stephens              
|                      |  | William L. Stephens                  
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Lawrence Safarek                 
|                      |  | Lawrence Safarek                     
|                      |  | Vice President and Treasurer         
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          22,106
<SECURITIES>                                   832,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               897,565
<PP&E>                                         301,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,591,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          465,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,784
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,892,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,591,720
<SALES>                                         21,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,244
<CGS>                                           18,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  590,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,147
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
May 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00284-CR V.

STEPHANIE SANDERS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record reveals error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment REVERSED

and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its 

opinion, and orders this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 131 (Thursday, July 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-71-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund 
Report

July 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 26, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing with the 
Commission its Refund Report for 1997 Gas Research Institute (GRI) 
overcollections in compliance with the Commission's ``Order Approving 
Refund Methodology for 1994 Overcollections'' issued February 22, 1995 
in GRI's Docket No. RP95-124-000.
    Williston Basin states that on May 20, 1998, GRI filed with the 
Commission its ``Revised Report on Refunds'' in Docket No. RP98-217-001 
in which it reported $160,236.00 was refunded to Williston Basin for 
1997 GRI overcollections.
    In addition, Williston Basin states that on June 11, 1998, refunds 
totaling $160,236.00 were sent to its applicable firm transportation 
shippers. Such refunds were based on the proportion of each applicable 
firm shipper's demand and commodity GRI charges paid during the 1997 
calendar year to the total applicable firm shippers' GRI charges paid 
during the 1997 calendar year.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 9, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18178 Filed 7-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3.1

                                STATE OF DELAWARE

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                           LOUDEYE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

The undersigned, Meena Kang Latta, hereby certifies:

      1.    She is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Secretary of
            Loudeye Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

      2.    The Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation was originally
            filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on March 26, 1998.

      3.    Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
            of Delaware, this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
            Incorporation amends Article I of this corporation's Certificate of
            Incorporation to read in its entirety as follows"

            "The name of the corporation is Loudeye Corp."

      4.    The foregoing Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by this
            corporation's Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with
            the applicable provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General
            Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

            Executed at Seattle, WA, on May 29, 2002

                                                    /s/  Meena Kang Latta
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                    Meena Kang Latta

                                                    Vice President and Secretary
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 285 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the exclusion from gross income of discharge of qualified principal residence 

indebtedness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the exclusion from gross income of discharge 

of qualified principal residence indebtedness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Debt Tax 

5 Forgiveness Act of 2018’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 285 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM 

2 GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF QUALI3 FIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108(a)(1)(E) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘which 

6 is discharged’’ and all that follows and inserting a period. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to indebtedness discharged after 

9 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS