alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JOHN A BOEHNER SPEAKER

O HIO H-232 U
. S C•••rN B•• oo·.G W•sw**··~•c·**.. o.c 20515 12021225-0600



### Congressional 

## Inquiries**~** 

### FAA Congressional Liaison Office PccleraJ Aviation Adn1inistrution 

## ROO Independence 

## Avenue, S. W. Room J022 Washington, DC 205 9 1-0004


### Dear 

### Congressional Liaison: 1\fnuH.c of iR.epnHttttattues July 25,2012 WA.SHINGTCN OFF1C£: 1011 LOuG\"'C!RlH ..1)1J$E a.. ,.er: Bv•LD"IG**W•s~** •.t:'"'' OC 20515·3508 (2021 225·6205

12 Sou - l•**Ptu._~** S1Pr:t,, 2,m FLC)CA TRo', OH 46373 (937) 339-152·1 0 1S1Rit;.l Toll FRU**NuWf.fl~** 1 800·582·1 oo I



### The enclosed correspondence, 

### regarding FAA-2012-0514. was 

### sent to me by 

### Mr. John 

### Brown. I would greatly 

## appreciate your providing my Troy 

### office 

### with any**~lpproptiate** 

### information so that I 

## can reply to 

### my constituent. If 

### l can provide additional infonnation. please do not hesitate to call me. 

### Sinccrdy. 

# a..

John A. Boclmcr JAB/tel



## FAA- '120730-009

### DeBrosse, Frank From: 

### Sent: John Brown Obrown@independentaircraft.com] Monday, July 23, 2012 2:46 PM 

### To: DeBrosse, Frank Subject: RE: FAA-2012-0514



### RE: FAA-2012-0514 Congressman John Boehner, We are requesting a Congressional Inquire due to potential safety issues if this exemption is granted; thus, putting the flying and non-flying public at risk. This exemption also has potential FTC implications; all of which would cost aerospace manufacturing and aerospace servicing jobs. Thank you,



### John 

### C. Rrow n 

### CEO and Founder

318

-487-0879 

### JB

### rown0Undependen

### taircra

### ft. com

www

### .lndependentAircraft.com

- -The information contained and within 

### this message, 

### and any attachments included, is intended only for use by 

### the individllal(s} or entity to 

### which it is addressed. The information included is confidentia l , legally privileged material, and exempt 

### from disc losure under applicable 

### law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or using the info rmati on . 

### lf you receive this e-mail in error, please contact the sender i mmediately by return e-mai l and delete the original message from your system.



### From: DeBrosse, Frank [mailto:Frank.DeBrosse@mail.hou se.gov] 

### Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 

### 1:36PM To: jbrown@independentaircraft.com 

### Subject: test

Frank DeBrosse Field Representative Congressman John Boehner Office: 937-339-1524 Fax: 937-339-1878



### FAA-120730-009 1
# C_2015138EN.01006701.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/67

---

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2015 — Watch TV v Council

(Case T-639/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 138/86)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPPTS-42191B; FRL-5768-2]


Endocrine Disruptors; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the seventh meeting the Endocrine Disruptors 
Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC), a committee 
established under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA) to advise EPA on a strategy for screening chemicals and 
pesticides for their potential to disrupt endocrine function in humans 
and wildlife.

DATES: The EDSTAC Plenary meeting will begin on Tuesday, February 3, 
1998 at 9 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. The meeting on Wednesday, February 4, 
1998, will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Madison Hotel located at 
11777 15th Street, NW., Washington, D.C. The telephone number is (202) 
862-1600.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information about the 
EDSTAC contact Dr. Anthony Maciorowski (telephone: (202) 260-3048; e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69b97959f99849981859d9fd88299988fb69386979b979f9ad8938697d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79a96949e98859880849c9ed98398998eb79287969a969e9bd9928796d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>) or Mr. Gary Timm (telephone 
(202) 260-1859; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#691d000404470e081b10290c190804080005470c1908470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34405d59591a5355464d7451445559555d581a5144551a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>) at EPA. To obtain 
additional information please contact the contractor assisting EPA with 
meeting facilitation and logistics: Ms. Tutti Otteson, The Keystone 
Center, P.O. Box 8606, Keystone, CO 80435; telephone: (970) 468-5822; 
fax (970) 262-0152; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#21554e555544524e4f614a445852554e4f440f4e5346"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f3b203b3b2a3c20210f242a363c3b20212a61203d28">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tentative agenda for the February 3-4, 
1998 plenary meeting includes status reports from the Screening and 
Testing and Priority Setting workgroups. This plenary will not include 
a public comment session.

List of Subjects

    Environmental Protection.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.

Susan H. Wayland,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and 
Toxic Substances.

[FR Doc. 98-1768 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013304EN.01000502.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 25 July 2013 — UAB ‘Vilniaus energija’ v Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius

(Case C-423/13)

2013/C 304/09

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: UAB ‘Vilniaus energija’

Claimant:

Defendant: Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and/or Directive 2004/22/EC (1) be interpreted as prohibiting a national regulation and practice under which a hot-water meter which satisfies all of the requirements of Directive 2004/22/EC and is connected to a remote (telemetric) data-transmission device is regarded as being a measuring system and by reason of that fact that hot-water meter cannot be used as intended until a metrological verification has been carried out on that meter and that remote (telemetric) data-transmission device as together constituting a measuring system?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments (OJ L 135, p. 1).

1

---
1 Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2The motion of appellee to strike Section A, pages 1-11, of appellant’s reply brief is GRANTED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-60570

_____________________ MAGNOLIA I INC., A Mississippi Corporation; HANCOCK ENTERTAINMENT LLC, a Louisiana Limited Liability Company; WELDON FROMMEYER, Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus HANCOCK COUNTY MISSISSIPPI, a political subdivision of the State of Mississippi, Defendant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:04-CV-789

_________________________________________________________________ Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1

AFFIRMED. See 5TH C IR . R. 47.6. 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 34255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16984]




                        Presidential Documents 


___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 34255]]

                Presidential Determination No. 98-30 of June 15, 1998

                
Report to Congress Regarding Conditions in Burma 
                and U.S. Policy Toward Burma

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the 
                heading ``Policy Toward Burma'' in section 570(d) of 
                the FY 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, as 
                contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations 
                Act (Public Law 104-208), a report is required every 6 
                months following enactment concerning:

                    L1) progress towards democratization in Burma;
                    L2) progress on improving the quality of life of 
                the Burmese people, including progress on market 
                reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of 
                forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental 
                quality; and
                    L3) progress made in developing a comprehensive 
                multilateral strategy to bring democracy to and improve 
                human rights practices and the quality of life in 
                Burma, including the development of a dialogue between 
                the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) and 
                democratic opposition groups in Burma.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit the 
                attached report fulfilling this requirement to the 
                appropriate committees of the Congress and to arrange 
                for publication of this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 15, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-16984
Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No.**  **DA 2 4**  **- 0**  **395**

__________________________________________________________________ JAWBONE HOLDINGS , LLC ,

Petitioner/Appellant v. THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATION, MONTANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ,

Respondent/

Cross
- Appellant and NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION d/b/a NORTHWESTERN ENERGY ,

Respondent/Appellee and THE MONTANA CONSUMER COUNSEL ,

Respondent
-

Interven o r/Appellee **ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS** This matter comes before the Court on Appellant Jawbone Holdings, LLC’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal, filed August 2 1 , 2024. Respondents/Appelle e s Montana Public Service Commission, NorthWestern Energy and the Montana Consumer Counsel d o not object to the Motion. Upon consideration of the Motion and good cause appearing, 08/21/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0395**IT IS HEREBY ORDERED** that the appeal in the above matter is he reby

**DISMISSED** with prejudice , and the docket closed.

Dated this ____ day of August , 202 4 .

________________________ Honorable Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2024
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ERRATA

May 19, 2005

Appeal No. 04-5152, RILEY & EPHRIAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v.

UNITED STATES

Precedential Opinion

Decided: May 18, 2005

Please make the following change:

On page 7, line 20: Delete "contractor " and insert -- contracting officer --.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6371
BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson, VPB, Official; GENE JOHNSON, Director; MARK R. WARNER, Governor; JAMES A. SISK, Manager, Official, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-00546-MHL) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Downey v. Fahey , No. 3:05-cv-00546-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21
 List of Subsidiaries
 %Name
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    OwnershipEntertainment Technology Corporation
    
    PA
    
    
    100
    %ETC International Corporation
    
    Barbados
    
    
    100
    %ETC-PZL Aerospace Industries
    
    Poland
    
    
    95
    %ETC-Europe
    
    Great Britain
    
    
    99
    %ETC-Delaware
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %NASTAR Center Holdings Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %NASTAR Center LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %
EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following are subsidiaries of the Company, the respective jurisdictions of
their incorporation and names (if any) under which they do business.  The
Company owns all of the voting securities (including directors' qualifying
shares owned beneficially by the Company) of each such subsidiary except the
Company owns only approximately 50% of EDO (Canada) Limited.

The names of particular subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted.  When
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, these omitted subsidiaries
do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as such term is defined in Rule
1-02(v) of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                      Jurisdiction        Name Under Which
                                           of                Subsidiary
     Name                             Incorporation        Does Business

EDO Western Corporation                  Utah           EDO Electro-Ceramics
EDO (Canada) Limited                     Canada
EDO Foreign Sales Corporation            U.S. Virgin
                                          Islands
EDO Sports, Inc.                         Delaware
EDO Western International Corporation    Delaware
EDO International Corporation            Delaware
EDO Energy Corporation                   Delaware
EDO Automotive Natural Gas, Inc.         Delaware
Specialty Plastics, Inc.                 Louisiana      EDO Specialty Plastics
EDO Acquisition II, Inc,                 Delaware       EDO Technology Services
                                                         and Analysis
EDO Acquisition III Corporation          Delaware
M. Technologies Inc.                     Pennsylvania   EDO M. Tech
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-230-CV

CITY OF CELINA AND CITY OF PILOT POINT APPELLANTS

V.

CITY OF PILOT POINT AND APPELLEES

TALLEY RANCH MANAGEMENT, LTD. 

AND CITY OF CELINA AND TALLEY 

RANCH MANAGEMENT, LTD. 

----------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

We have considered “Cross-Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal of the City of Pilot Point, appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f). This case shall hereafter be styled “City of Celina v. City of Pilot Point

and Talley Ranch Management, Ltd.”
2

Costs of the appeal of City of Pilot Point, appellant, versus City of Celina

and Talley Ranch Management, Ltd., appellees, shall be taxed against the party

incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 25, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2783-000]


Bridgeport Energy L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 30, 1998.
    Bridgeport Energy L.L.C. (Bridgeport) filed an application for 
Commission authorization to engage in wholesale power sales at market-
based rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
Bridgeport requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by Bridgeport. On June 24, 1998, the Commission issued an 
Order Accepting For Filing Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-
docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 24, 1998 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
Bridgeport should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, Bridgeport is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Bridgeport, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
Bridgeport's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. . . 
.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 24, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17882 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Betty L. McCabe, Appellant, v Town of Riverhead, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 802]—

*417In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated October 2, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Town of Riverhead did not receive prior written notice of the sidewalk defect over which the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell as required by the Town of Riverhead Code § 10-2. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the two letters regarding the general deteriorated condition of the sidewalks in the downtown district did not sufficiently identify the particular defect which caused the plaintiff to fall and its location *(see Hampton v Town of N. Hempstead,*298 AD2d 556 [2002]; *Camenson v Town of N. Hempstead,*298 AD2d 543 [2002]; *Gellos v Town of Hempstead,*284 AD2d 370 [2001]; *James v City of New Rochelle,*282 AD2d 503, 505 [2001]). Furthermore, notice of one isolated sidewalk defect in front of property adjoining the subject property more than two years before this accident did not, without more, qualify as notice of the particular sidewalk defect in front of the subject property *(see Jones v Town of Brookhaven,*227 AD2d 530 [1996]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2808 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2808

  To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to include data on animal abuse 
 in the national clearinghouse for information relating to child abuse 
                              and neglect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2019

Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire (for herself and Mr. Katko) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to include data on animal abuse 
 in the national clearinghouse for information relating to child abuse 
                              and neglect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child and Animal Abuse Detection and 
Reporting Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF DATA ON ANIMAL ABUSE IN NATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR 
              INFORMATION RELATING TO CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT.

    Section 103(b)(6) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 
(42 U.S.C. 5104(b)(6)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by adding ``and'' at the end; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) the incidence of any such cases related to 
                animal abuse (including any act or failure to act, 
                which results in undue pain, suffering, or death to any 
                animal, without regard to whether such act or failure 
                to act is a violation of State or local cruelty 
                law);''.
                                 <all>
```