alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         169
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  937
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (213)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,215
<PP&E>                                       5,262
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,609)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,183    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,929
<BONDS>                                      2,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       639
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,829)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,183
<SALES>                                      5,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,347
<CGS>                                        3,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.17)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2014039EN.01002602.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/26

---

Action brought on 9 December 2013 — Enercon v OHIM (Shades of the colour green)

(Case T-655/13)

2014/C 39/47

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Enercon GmbH (Aurich, Germany) (represented by R. Böhm, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 in Case R 0247/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 in Case R 0247/2013-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark representing shades of the colour green for goods in Classes 7, 16 and 28 — Community trade mark application No 11055811

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
														Search

		Submit


Southern Tick–Associated Rash Illness


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Southern Tick–Associated Rash Illness								Related Pages
										lone star tick on green backgroundSTARIWhere lone star ticks can be found...Learn more
A rash similar to the rash of Lyme disease has been described in humans following bites of the lone star tick, *Amblyomma americanum*. The rash may be accompanied by fatigue, fever, headache, muscle and joint pains. This condition has been named southern tick-associated rash illness (STARI). The cause of STARI is not known.STARI or Lyme?Symptoms, Diagnosis and TreatmentDistributionReferencesGeneral Tick InformationAvoiding ticks
Tick removal
Diseases transmitted by ticks
										
							
								Page last reviewed:  September 25, 2019						Content source:  	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Vector-Borne Diseases (DVBD) STARI Home
STARI or Lyme?
Symptoms
Distribution
References


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
No. 10-6298.

#### Nicholas Schwieterman, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 571,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8744.

178 L. Ed. 2d 418,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Mercer County, denied.
No. 10-6455.

#### Joshua Andrew Soto, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 606,

178 L. Ed. 2d 441,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8844.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.
No. 10-7923.

#### Trevor Spears, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1026,

178 L. Ed. 2d 849,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 634.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 962.
No. 10-7485.

#### Kendrick Antonio Simpson, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1009,

178 L. Ed. 2d 838,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 712.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.

Same case below, 230 P.3d 888.
No. 10-5940.

#### Kevin Joseph Fenner, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 900,

178 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 343.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*759Same case below, 600 F.3d 1014.
No. 10-7657.

#### Jeffrey J. Jackson, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 956,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 566.

178 L. Ed. 2d 789,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
No. 10-437.

#### Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mountaineer Property Co. II, LLC, et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 662,

178 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9236.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 812.
Ms.MaiaBellonBENTONCLEANAIRAGENCYJune15,2015Director,WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology300DesmondDriveSELacey,WA98503'DearMs.BellonBentonCleanAirAgency(BCAA)requeststhatWashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology(Ecology)adopttheattachedrevisiontotheWashingtonStateImplementationPlan(SIP)andsubmitittoEPAforapproval.WhilepreparingtheruleforSIPsubmission,globalrevisionsweremadetoclarifyandsimplifytherulelanguage.Oneoftheseglobalchangeswastoremove"shall"fromtherulewasmadetoallpartsofRegulation1duringthisrevision.TheBCAABoarddesiredtocommunicatewithplainlanguage.Therewasandisnointenttochangethemandatorynatureoftherule;theintentofthischangeistoclearlycommunicaterequirementsfortheregulatedcommunityinmorecommonparlance.Pleasedonothesitatetocontactmeforfurtherconversationorclarification.Kennewick,WA•526SouthClodfelterRoad•Kennewick,Washington99336•FaxNumber509-783-6562Phone:509.783.1304•Website:www.bentoncleanair.org
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
                 Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,  Paul M.  Joeckel,  the  Secretary  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Eagle
Exploration Company,  (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     March 31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 29, 2005
                                          /s/  Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Name: Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
```
Jeanne Santoli

Immunization Services Division

National Center for Immunization and Respiratory 

Diseases

June 24, 2021

VFC Resolution Update:

Dengue Vaccines
Purpose of the Resolution

The purpose of this resolution is to add a vaccine for the 

prevention of Dengue to the VFC program. 
Children aged 9-16 years of age with laboratory 

confirmation of previous dengue infection and living in 

endemic areas (i.e., Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and 

the US Virgin Islands). 

 This VFC resolution will be updated, as necessary, if 

dengue-endemic areas in the US or its territories 

change.

Eligible Groups
Recommended Vaccination Schedule and Intervals

 Three doses administered 6 months apart at 0, 6, and 12 

months

Recommended Dosage

 Refer to product package inserts

Recommended Vaccination 

Schedule, Intervals, and Dosage
Contraindications and Precautions

 Contraindications and Precautions can be found in the 

package inserts available at 

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-bloodbiologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states
Statement Regarding Update Based on 

Published Documents

 [If an ACIP recommendation regarding dengue 

vaccination is published within 6 months 

following this resolution, the relevant language 

above (except in the eligible groups sections) 

will be replaced with the language in the 

recommendation and incorporated by reference 

to the URL.]
# C_2016211EN.01001501.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Udine — Italy) — proceedings by Degano Trasporti Sas di Ferruccio Degano & C., in liquidation

(Case C-546/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - VAT - Article 4(3) TEU - Directive 2006/112/EC - Insolvency - Procedure for an arrangement with creditors - Partial payment of VAT debts))

(2016/C 211/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Udine

Party to the main proceedings

Degano Trasporti Sas di Ferruccio Degano & C., in liquidation

Intervening party: Pubblico Ministero presso il Tribunale di Udine

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 2, 250(1) and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, interpreted as meaning that an insolvent trader may apply to a court to open a procedure for an arrangement with creditors for the purpose of settling its debts by liquidating its assets, in which that trader offers only partial payment of a value added tax debt and establishes by an independent expert’s report that that debt would not be repaid more fully in the event of that trader’s bankruptcy.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

---
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ZUMAR HAMID DUBOSE, aka Zumar Du B ose Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2024

- 1578

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:20

- cr

- 00453

- WB, Judge Wendy Beetlestone.

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

On March 13, 2023, the court received a notice of appeal signed by Kariem Baseer Du B ose , appeal ing the district court’s judgment in the underlying criminal case

, ECF

No. 1

- 2 at 1 , though t he notice of appeal was mailed by Zumar DuBose, another defendant in the case. Id. at 2

. This is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not include jurisdiction over criminal cases. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295. The appropriate court for this appeal is the United Case: 24-1578 Document: 2 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024US v. DUBOSE 2

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See 28 U. S.C. § § 41, 1291

. I t is unclear whether Kariem or Zumar intended to appeal his respective criminal conviction , and although Mssrs. DuBose have appeals currently pending at the Third Circuit, it is unclear whether those appeals are the same as this appeal. The court, there fore, will transfer

this case to the Third Circuit.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

This appeal and all filings are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

April 11

, 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 24-1578 Document: 2 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024
No. 09-11545.

#### Crandall Postell, Petitioner v. Bank of Central Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 982,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 120.

178 L. Ed. 2d 810,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 218, 178 L. Ed. 2d 131, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6796.
# C_2015198EN.01001502.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/15

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2015 — Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL and Others v Council of the European Union

(Case C-164/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Fisheries policy - Conservation of fishery resources - Fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements - Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC - Admissibility of the action - Measure not directly concerning individuals - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 198/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL, Pesquerias Campo de Marte, SL, Pesquera Anpajo, SL, Arrastreros del Barbanza, SA, Martinez Pardavila e Hijos, SL, Lijo Pesca, SL, Frigorificos Hermanos Vidal, SA, Pesquera Boteira, SL, Francisco Mariño Mos y Otros, CB, Perez Vidal Juan Antonio y Hno, CB, Marina Nalda, SL, Portillo y Otros, SL, Vidiña Pesca, SL, Pesca Hermo, SL, Pescados Oubiña Perez, SL, Manuel Pena Graña, Campo Eder, SL, Pesquera Laga, SL, Pesquera Jalisco, SL, Pesquera Jopitos, SL, Pesca-Julimar, SL (represented by: J. Tojeiro Sierto, abogado)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and A. de Gregorio Merino, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Szmytkowska and I. Galindo Martín, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2) | Pesquerias Riveirenses SL and Others shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Pesquerias Riveirenses SL and Others shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3) | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.

1

---
No. 10-385.

#### James E. Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1178, 131 S. Ct. 999,

178 L. Ed. 2d 826,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 742.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 193.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30653 Conference Calendar

__________________ GEORGE DON MCGUFFEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY; JEFFERY HEWES; JAMMIE GAUF; MARVIN GREMILLION; UNKNOWN BANKSTON; UNKNOWN GREEN; UNKNOWN DUCOTE; UNKNOWN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CV-322

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George Don McGuffey has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on his appeal of the district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law for the defendant in McGuffey's civil rights action. The court previously granted conditional IFP status to McGuffey for the preparation of a trial transcript at government expense. After a review of the record, we concludeNo. 95-30653 -2- that McGuffey has not demonstrated that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Therefore, his IFP status is revoked and the appeal is dismissed. See Hailes v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. , 729 F.2d 1037 (5th Cir. 1984). DISMISSED.
No. 09-11182.

#### Mervin G. Anderson, Petitioner v. Juan Castillo, Warden.

562 U.S. 1087, 131 S. Ct. 691,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9192.

178 L. Ed. 2d 521,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 866, 131 S. Ct. 154, 178 L. Ed. 2d 92, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6675.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.9 MB)
 
 Pearl Harbor news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.9 MB)
 
 Pearl Harbor news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.9 MB)
 
 Pearl Harbor news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.9 MB)
 
 Pearl Harbor news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7391

WILLIAM HARLAN PANTHER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus L. JARVIS, Warden, Bland Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-01-712-7) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Harlan Panther, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Harlan Panther seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Panther has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a c onstitutional right. See Panther v. Jarvis , No. CA-01-712-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED