alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Incorporated Under the Laws of The State of Delaware

	
    Number

   ___________
	
Shares  

      ________




GOLDEN WEST BREWING COMPANY, INC.

The Corporation is authorized to issue 20,000,000 Common Shares -- Par Value
$.0001 each

       This Certifies That                         **(NAME)**                       is the owner of

(letter amount)------------------------------------------------------------ fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

       In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation.

Dated________________________



      
__________________________________________             
__________________________________________

                                      
Secretary                                                                                                           
President
# C_2014085EN.01002001.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/20

---

Action brought on 2 December 2013 — Wolverine International v OHIM — BH Stores (cushe)

(Case T-642/13)

2014/C 85/34

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wolverine International, LP (Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands) (represented by: M. Plesser and R. Heine, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BH Stores BV (Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 September 2013 given in Case R 1269/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 September 2013 given in Case R 1269/2012-4;

| — | Reject the request for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject the request for a declaration of invalidity;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘cushe’ for goods in Class 25 — International Registration No 859 087 designating the European Union

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Likelihood of confusion pursuant to Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) CTMR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and declared the contested IR designating the European Union invalid

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 57(2) and (3) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 165A22

Filed 16 June 2023

W. AVALON POTTS, derivatively on behalf of STEEL TUBE, INC., plaintiff

v. 

KEL, LLC, and RIVES & ASSOCIATES, LLC, defendants; STEEL TUBE, INC., 

nominal defendant; and LEON L. RIVES, II, defendant/counterclaimant/third-party 

plaintiff

v. 

AVALON1, LLC, third-party defendant/counterclaimant

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-27(a)(2) from the trial court’s order and 

opinion on defendants’ Rule 59 motion for a new trial and Rule 50(b) motion for 

judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered on 5 November 2021 by Judge Adam 

M. Conrad, Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases, in Superior 

Court, Iredell County, after the case was designated a mandatory complex business 

case by the Chief Justice pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-45.4(b). Heard in the Supreme 

Court on 25 April 2023.

Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, by Mark A. Nebrig, John T. Floyd, and Benjamin 

E. Shook, for plaintiff-appellee W. Avalon Potts, derivatively on behalf of Steel 

Tube, Inc., and third-party defendant-appellee Avalon1, LLC.

Tuggle Duggins P.A., by Richard W. Andrews, Jeffrey S. Southerland, and 

Daniel D. Stratton, for defendant-appellants Rives & Associates, LLC, and 

Leon L. Rives II.

No brief filed for defendant-appellee KEL, LLC.
POTTS V. KEL, LLC

Opinion of the Court

-2-

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the trial court’s 5 November 2021 order and opinion,

we affirm the denial of defendants’ motion for a new trial and motion for judgment 

notwithstanding the verdict.

AFFIRMED.1

1 The order and opinion of the North Carolina Business Court, 2021 NCBC 72, is

available at https://www.nccourts.gov/assets/documents/opinions/2021%20NCBC%2072.pdf.
# C_2017178EN.01003301.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/33

---

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — AATC Trading (ALIA)

(Case T-299/13) (1)

1

(2017/C 178/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 10.26





Escalade, Incorporated


Schedule of Director Compensation





Each independent director of Escalade, Incorporated currently is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the Audit Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $15,000. Each member of the Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $3,000 except for the Compensation Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $10,000. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive additional fees of $1,000 per committee meeting attended in excess of six and four meetings respectively. Mr. Robert Griffin, the Chairman of the Board, is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $88,889. All independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin are entitled to receive an additional fee of $1,000 per board meeting attended in excess of eight meetings per year. In 2009, and continuing through 2010, the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin have all volunteered to take a 10% reduction in all fees in which they are entitled to receive. In 2010, each of the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin received an annual stock option award of 5,000 shares with a one year vesting.





Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, directors can elect to receive some or all of the fees earned in shares of the Company’s common stock or in the form of RSU’s which vest after one year. In 2010, there were 36,724 shares of common stock issued pursuant to the plan. In 2010, directors R. Griffin, Baalmann, and White opted to receive 100% of the fees they were entitled to in the form of common stock. Director Williams received a combination of cash and stock. Directors Matthews and Savitsky received their fees in cash.





Directors Keller and Patrick Griffin are full-time employees of the Company and receive no board fees in connection with their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.
# Celebrating DLA's 60th Anniversary: DLA Energy Task Force Americas

/ Published Nov. 2, 2021

DLA is celebrating 60 years of logistics support since it was created Oct. 1, 1961. The theme is “Forged by History, Focused on the Future.” 

In times of national disasters and hurricanes, Defense Logistics Agency Energy and its Task Force Americas provides vital fuel support to the nation. As the executive agent for Class III products, petroleum, oil and lubricants, DLA Energy provides support to Federal Emergency Management Agency through its multi-purpose fuel contingency contact with a designated fuel contractor.

Since March 2006, DLA Energy has provided ground fuel support to meet FEMA’s fuel requirements during presidentially-declared national emergencies and disasters. Notable DLA Energy deployments include Hurricane Sandy in 2012 and in 2017, three hurricanes within 30 days; Harvey, Irma and Maria.

For more stories, videos, and graphics highlighting the agency’s history and people, go to the DLA 60th Anniversary page.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17969]



[[Page 36445]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting; Record of Vote of Meeting Closure (Public 
Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b)

    I, Michael J. Gaines, Chairman of the United States Parole 
Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission which started 
at approximately nine-thirty a.m. on Tuesday, June 30, 1998, at 5550 
Friendship Boulevard, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The purpose of the 
meeting was to decide one appeal from the National Commissioners' 
decisions pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Section 2.27. Three Commissioners were 
present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was 
submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Michael J. Gaines, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., 
and John R. Simpson.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: June 30, 1998.
Michael J. Gaines,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-17969 Filed 7-1-98; 2:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
# C_2015371EN.01001101.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Corina van der Lans v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

(Case C-257/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Passengers’ rights in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Denied boarding and cancellation - Long flight delay - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Extraordinary circumstances))

(2015/C 371/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Corina van der Lans

Applicant:

Defendant: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 must be interpreted as meaning that a technical problem, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which occurred unexpectedly, which is not attributable to poor maintenance and which was also not detected during routine maintenance checks, does not fall within the definition of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
# C_2013367EN.01004101.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/41

---

Action brought on 4th October 2013 — ZZ v ECB

(Case F-99/13)

2013/C 367/73

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the 2012 appraisal report and of the decisions taken on that basis, plus the granting of damages for the moral prejudice suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Applicant’s 2012 appraisal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Applicant’s 2012 appraisal;

| — | if necessary, annul the decision of 18th April 2013 rejecting the request for an administrative review and of the decision of 23rd July 2013 rejecting the grievance; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, annul the decision of 18th April 2013 rejecting the request for an administrative review and of the decision of 23rd July 2013 rejecting the grievance;

th

rd

| — | annul any decision taken on the basis of the illegal 2012 appraisal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul any decision taken on the basis of the illegal 2012 appraisal;

| — | order the Defendant to compensate the moral prejudice suffered evaluated ex aequo et bono at 10 000 €; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Defendant to compensate the moral prejudice suffered evaluated ex aequo et bono at 10 000 €;

| — | order the Defendant to pay all costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Defendant to pay all costs.

---
# C_2013274EN.01002302.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/23

---

Action brought on 30 July 2013 — Dosen v OHIM — Gramm (Nano-Pad)

(Case T-396/13)

2013/C 274/39

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Franko Dosen (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Losert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thomas Gramm (Bremen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 September 2011 (Ref: 4204 C) in the form of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 May 2013 in Case R 1981/2011-4. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 September 2011 (Ref: 4204 C) in the form of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 May 2013 in Case R 1981/2011-4.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘Nano-Pad’ for goods in Class 17 — Community trade mark No 8 228 421

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Franko Dosen

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Thomas Gramm

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute grounds for invalidity under Article 52(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: The application for a declaration of invalidity was granted in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,  Paul M.  Joeckel,  the  Secretary  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Eagle
Exploration Company,  (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 14, 2004

                                          /s/  Paul  M. Joeckel
                                          Name: Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Title: Secretary and Chief Financial
                                                 Officer
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




The
      undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
      hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on
      Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
      certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
      Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
      certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
      that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
                August 7, 2008
            /s/
                Mark T. FrostName:
                Mark T. FrostTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer and
                Treasurer
# C_2015198EN.01001201.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov (Romania)) — Mihai Manea v Instituția Prefectului județul Brașov — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim de Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor

(Case C-76/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Tax levied by a Member State on motor vehicles at the time of their first registration or of the first transfer of the right of ownership - Neutrality as between second-hand motor vehicles imported from other Member States and similar motor vehicles available on the domestic market))

(2015/C 198/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Braşov

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mihai Manea

Applicant:

Defendant: Instituția Prefectului județul Brașov — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim de Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as:

| — | not precluding a Member State from introducing a tax on motor vehicles which is levied on imported second-hand vehicles at the time of their first registration in that Member State and on vehicles already registered in that Member State at the time of the first transfer, within that Member State, of the ownership of those vehicles; |
| --- | --- |

—

not precluding a Member State from introducing a tax on motor vehicles which is levied on imported second-hand vehicles at the time of their first registration in that Member State and on vehicles already registered in that Member State at the time of the first transfer, within that Member State, of the ownership of those vehicles;

| — | precluding that Member State from exempting from that tax vehicles already registered and in respect of which a tax previously in force but found to be incompatible with EU law has been paid. |
| --- | --- |

—

precluding that Member State from exempting from that tax vehicles already registered and in respect of which a tax previously in force but found to be incompatible with EU law has been paid.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              97
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,896
<PP&E>                                          51,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,742
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,673
<BONDS>                                         26,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           873
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,067
<SALES>                                         28,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,344
<CGS>                                           22,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                491
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,462)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,971)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.77)
        

</TABLE>