alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUDLUM
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  680,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,932
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,420,565
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,806,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,284,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,468,376
<BONDS>                                        975,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,210
<OTHER-SE>                                    (194,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,284,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,474,872
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  976,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               260,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,358
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
#### Garst Fruit Company, Inc., a corporation *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. R. R. Griffin and R. S. Clark, co-partners, doing business under the firm name of Griffin & Clark, *Defendants in Error.*

144 So. 307.

Division A.

Decision filed November 3, 1932.

*W. B. Shelby Crichlow,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*G. P. Smythe,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
#### *Heinzig et al., Petitioners, v. Seok Hwang et al., Respondents,*

No. 92212-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72269-7-I, June 29, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 304. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
# TEIEA~QD~EYGENEIZIL~~% ow TEXASMrs. Elowaen Merch, R.N., RF 2

Omt&a 

### otku band, wa flad Article 4J28, Revbod Civil 

### Stututa8, wkiek 

### racds 88 fmllowar

**-Tkdslaw8h8llnotbacaut?udtospplyto tha**  **grrtnitous au8bq**  **of tlr,**  **rick by**  

### frbatla, no8 any **param uusiq**  **t&c 8ick**  **for kire**  **w& &ea**  **rd k**  **uf** wa7 

### u8ume **or profasr**  **to prscttcs**  **u a**  **griauk** **e*i** **twod ngistara4**  **urao. ‘**  **! Co**  **turn -p.utical**  **nusa-** duotos 

### to **us** Unt 

### tk **por** 8on pr*cticlq 

### l

uch l p?ds88ia n d.mB ,?u*e ie? biTa er colnpa

### l tlan ui eqresal7 **ladleda that**  

### tbst **purr is**  **ut a**  **graduk** 

### ralfrtprad marso. **Onloss PI**  **bch00l fn**  

### quc8tion **repnbontb itbaLi,**  **u truhisq**  **persea** 

### for **gra.&sata codified**  **tqbkred aarshg,**  **tka** stdutas, AHi&8 4513and 4322 

### are not spplicsbl*. ‘We fiw3 uothbg tkat 

### lndlcCtr8 t&t tin &g58lhzo intan& tht 7,arT board 8hodd uucfsa y cmatrol war 

### 8ucb 8ebaaL

It k our mplatem



### tbt tbqk 7a 

### raquaat tba diatrtct 

### orc~stbry*IIEkrL~8~~rc~totJ*uticra ta prww%t tba wmhtuuca aa opu4tioa of such rcwol u t&a Petl rs u T rd s in g c o u sa f a t P u c ti c s l N UIU, aa Dis t ri c t Atto rn a y, County iUtom7 or tha Attony Cknor8l has no authority to t&o say action to ra s t rd n tbs aptdon of this 8 c h rd.

ATTORNEYGENERALOF7EXzS

Mm AW *al **APPROVriD JVL**  **17.1939 (Zl&aodj**  **w. Ft.**  **Moon** FlMT ASSUITANT ATTORNEY OENSRAL M o?rt8 Hodges Aa*istut

APPROVED **OPWt$?l ’** **ZCObt3.4lTTr;e; By**  **w.LlL,c-**
FOURTH ESTATE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (FEPAAS)

GENERAL INFORMATION

FEPAAS WEBSITE: https://fepaas.whs.mil

ORIGIN: FEPAAS was originally developed by the Navy in response to Hurricane Katrina. 

During that disaster over one million people were displaced and it took a long time to locate 

employees. Since that time versions have been deployed by the Air Force and Army. DLA is one 

of a number of DoD agencies utilizing this valuable tool.

FEPAAS HOSTING: The system is maintained and hosted by the Navy. They have performed 

all required security reviews and have certified the system as meeting DoD and Federal data 

protection requirements.

PRIVACY STATEMENT: The collection and use of data is covered by the privacy notice http:

//privacy.defense.gov/notices/osd/DPR39.shtml

DOD GUIDANCE ON ACCOUNTABILITY: Personnel accountability is covered by DoD 

Instruction 3001.02 ‘Personnel Accountability in Conjunction with Natural or Manmade 

Disasters’

DOES FEPAAS CONTACT EMPLOYEES: FEPAAS is not a notification tool, but it can send 

emails and text messages to email addresses and cell phone numbers listed in your FEPAAS My 

Info area. It will be used to supplement local notification procedures.

FEPAAS DATA SOURCES: The employee data in FEPAAS comes from the Defense Civilian 

Personnel Data System (DCPDS) and the Defense Enrollment Eligibility System (DEERS). Links 

are available within FEPAAS to update information as required.

WHO IS REQUIRED TO ACCOUNT?

– All civilians

– Non-appropriated fund employees

– Overseas (OCONUS) contractors

– Overseas (OCONUS) family members

MILITARY MEMBERS ASSIGNED TO DLA: Military members must account for 

themselves in their service version of PAAS. Military members who are DLA supervisors must 

register in FEPAAS to account for the employees they supervise.

IS A CAC REQUIRED FOR ACCESS? A CAC is required for supervisors to access the 

employee information (right side entry point on the FEPAAS login screen). Employees may 

access FEPAAS with a CAC or with a user id and password.

WHY DOES THE FEPAAS LINK REFERENCE WHS? DLA is partnering with the 

Washington Headquarters Service (WHS) and other DoD agencies to use FEPAAS. WHS is the 

lead agency and established the original site for the DoD agencies’ version of PAAS.
# C_2016419EN.01000901.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Attorney General

(Case C-592/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Cosmetic products - Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 - Article 18(1)(b) - Cosmetic products containing ingredients, or a combination of ingredients, which have been the subject of animal testing ‘in order to meet the requirements of this Regulation’ - Prohibition of marketing within the European Union - Scope))

(2016/C 419/10)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients

Applicant:

Defendants: Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Attorney General

Defendants:

Intervening parties: Cruelty Free International, formerly British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, European Coalition to End Animal Experiments

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products must be interpreted as meaning that it may prohibit the placing on the European Union market of cosmetic products containing some ingredients that have been tested on animals outside the European Union, in order to market cosmetic products in third countries, if the resulting data is used to prove the safety of those products for the purposes of placing them on the EU market.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

1

---
# C_2014024EN.01003101.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/31

---

Action brought on 12 November 2013 — Wilo v OHIM (Pioneering for You)

(Case T-601/13)

2014/C 24/56

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wilo SE (Dortmund, Germany) (represented by B. Schneiders, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 in Case R 555/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 in Case R 555/2013-4;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Pioneering for You’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 11, 37 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 11 065 588

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2015381EN.01001001.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de prud’hommes de Paris — France) — O v Bio Philippe Auguste SARL

(Case C-432/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination on grounds of age - Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Article 2(1) and 2(2)(a) - Difference in treatment on grounds of age - Whether situations comparable - Grant of a payment, on the expiry of a fixed-term employment contract, intended to compensate for insecurity - Exclusion of young people working during their school holidays or university vacations))

(2015/C 381/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil de prud’hommes de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: O

Applicant:

Defendant: Bio Philippe Auguste SARL

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age, enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and given specific expression by Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which an end-of-contract payment, paid in addition to an employee’s salary on the expiry of a fixed-term employment contract where the contractual relationship is not continued in the form of a contract for an indefinite period, is not payable in the event that the contract is concluded with a young person for a period during his school holidays or university vacation.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 1.2.2014.

1

---
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

AN ACT 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain 

benefits paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2938 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring American 

3 Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘HAVEN 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME. 

6 Section 101(10A) of title 11, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(B)(i) includes any amount paid by any 

10 entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case 

11 the debtor and the debtor’s spouse), on a reg12 ular basis for the household expenses of the 

13 debtor or the debtor’s dependents (and in a 

14 joint case the debtor’s spouse if not otherwise 

15 a dependent); and 

16 ‘‘(ii) excludes— 

17 ‘‘(I) benefits received under the Social 

18 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); 

19 ‘‘(II) payments to victims of war 

20 crimes or crimes against humanity on ac21 count of their status as victims of such 

22 crimes; 

23 ‘‘(III) payments to victims of inter24 national terrorism or domestic terrorism, 

25 as those terms are defined in section 2331 
3 

•HR 2938 EH

1 of title 18, on account of their status as 

2 victims of such terrorism; and 

3 ‘‘(IV) any monthly compensation, pen4 sion, pay, annuity, or allowance paid under 

5 title 10, 37, or 38 in connection with a dis6 ability, combat-related injury or disability, 

7 or death of a member of the uniformed 

8 services, except that any retired pay ex9 cluded under this subclause shall include 

10 retired pay paid under chapter 61 of title 

11 10 only to the extent that such retired pay 

12 exceeds the amount of retired pay to which 

13 the debtor would otherwise be entitled if 

14 retired under any provision of title 10 

15 other than chapter 61 of that title.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

17 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

18 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

19 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

20 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

21 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

22 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro-
4 

•HR 2938 EH

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2938 

AN ACT 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income 

erans Affairs and the Department of Defense. certain benefits paid by the Department of Vet-
No. 10-338.

#### Domenic Tricome, Petitioner v. eBay, Inc.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 982,

178 L. Ed. 2d 811,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 163.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 529, 178 L. Ed. 2d 374, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8475.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1770]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0093]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Transportation 
Discrepancy Report, SF 361

AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding reinstatement 
to a previously approved OMB clearance (3090-0093).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Transportation Discrepancy Report, SF-361.

DATES: Comment Due Date: March 27, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Sullins, Federal Supply Service (816) 926-2932.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
reinstate information collection, 3090-0093 concerning Transportation 
Discrepancy Report, SF-361. This form is prepared by Government 
shippers or receivers to document loss, damage, or other discrepancy 
resulting from the movement of freight by commercial transportation 
companies.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 160; annual responses: 1; average hours per response: 
1; burden hours: 160.
    Copy of Proposal: A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the 
GSA Acquisition Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or 
by faxing your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-1770 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-110194 and 33-37692 on Form S-8 and No. 333-17295 on Forms S-8 and S-3
of Electro Rent Corporation of our report dated July 28, 2004 (which expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to a change
in accounting principle described in Note 3 and to the restatement described in
Note 17), incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Electro Rent Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 13, 2004

                                  Exhibit (A)
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      August 6, 2010
              /s/ Mark T. FrostName:
      Mark T. FrostTitle:
      Senior Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
                Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[C-930-1430-01; COC-47115]


Public Land Order No. 7345; Revocation of Public Land Order No. 
6803; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes, in its entirety, a public land order that 
withdrew 30 acres of public land for a Forest Service administrative 
site. The land is no longer needed for this purpose and the Forest 
Service has relinquished the withdrawal. This action will open the land 
to the operation of the public land laws. The land is temporarily 
closed to mining due to a pending land exchange proposal. The land has 
been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Public Land Order No. 6803, which withdrew public land for the 
Forest Service Sulphur Center Administrative Site, is hereby revoked in 
its entirety:

Sixth Principal Meridian

    T. 1 N., R. 76 W., sec. 8, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\ and E\1/2\NW\1/
4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 30 acres in Grand County.
    2. At 9 a.m. on August 3, 1998, the land will be opened to the 
operation of the public land laws generally, subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of 
record, and the requirements of applicable law. All valid applications 
received at or prior to 9 a.m. on August 3, 1998, shall be considered 
as simultaneously filed at that time. Those received thereafter shall 
be considered in the order of filing.

    Dated: June 18, 1998
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-17657 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### People v Heath

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 421 (NY)

denied 8/5/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
#### *Binschus et al., Respondents, v. Dep’t of Corr. et al., Defendants, Skagit County, Petitioner,*

No. 91644-6.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71752-9-1, February 23, 2015, 186 Wn. App. 77. *Granted*September 30, 2015.