alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Byron L. Bergren, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this amended report on Form 10-K of The Elder-Beerman
Stores Corp.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




Date:  October 15, 2003            By:  /s/  Byron L. Bergren
                                        ---------------------

                                   Name:   Byron L. Bergren
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
4-2-13 

To: 

From: 

Re: 

Department of Transportation 

Bret Carpenter-Basin State Bank Branch President 

Former Central MT EAS Representative 

Former local Economic Development Chairman 

Lewistown Air Service 

This is a letter of support to keep EAS funding for the Lewistown Airport and a 

commercial air provider. This is an important asset to our community and should not be 

allowed to cease. 

It is apparent that when our air provider offered a direct flight to Denver, rider ship 

increased. Later, with a Billili.gs destination, rider ship shrunk. This seems partly due to 

the fact that people drive to Billings when they need to access that city from the 

Lewistown area, plus the reliability of the Billings flight was questionable in the public's 

eye. The Denver flight allowed for the pilots and planes to 'overnight' here, thus 

assuring the plane would be here the following morning. I believe a return flight to 

Denver, with ample marketing efforts, will soon document increased rider ship. 

From an economic development view, our community has worked over several years to 

create an industrial park at our airport, with some success. We know that having public 

air service here is one more reason to consider starting or relocating a business here. 

Without it, many other communities look more attractive; We have no Interstate 

highway, train, bus service, etc; thus our last form of public transportation cannot be lost. 

If the EAS funding left, so would the airport jobs including the local provider 'counter 

staff & service crew', TSA employees, and perhaps a downsizing of airport management 

and maintenance jobs. Without a public air provider, our airport loses· some future grant 

and financial aid funding from sources including FAA, due to a decreased size and 

operations resulting from the loss of the provider. 

As a local bank employee, it is too apparent that our community cannot afford to lose 

jobs or any economic benefits this community currently has. OUr main street continues 

to suffer due to our proximity, internet sales, and local residents traveling to larger 

communities for things from groceries to clothing. I continue to see some looking 

elsewhere for better paying jobs, thus it is critical we work to keep and develop 

opportunities we have. 

'~ 

My plea is to continue to offer EAS benefits to this community. With an alternate route 

to a major hub, like Denver, this community has voiced its support for it and to use it, 

assuming the reliability improves. I would enjoy an opportunity to discuss this further, 

and can be reached at 406538.3301. Thanks for your consideration. 

SLl
No. 10-336.

#### Larry Green, Petitioner v. Fidelity Investments.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 598,

178 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8874.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 573.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Burgess, Petitioner,*

No. 91747-7.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 70903-8-1, April 27, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 1013. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
# C_2015302EN.01001002.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kecskeméti Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Robert Michal Chmielewski v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-alföldi Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

(Case C-255/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 - Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union - Articles 3 and 9 - Obligation to declare - Infringement - Penalties - Proportionality))

(2015/C 302/13)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kecskeméti Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Robert Michal Chmielewski

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-alföldi Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in order to penalise a failure to comply with the obligation to declare laid down in Article 3 of that regulation, imposes payment of an administrative fine, the amount of which corresponds to 60 % of the amount of undeclared cash, where that sum is more than EUR 50  000.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Viking  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
B.  Marsh,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 8, 2004



/s/ Thomas B. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer, President
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I,  Richard  A.  Pomije,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and  principal
financial  officer of eNetpc,  Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended August 31, 2002 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  July 15, 2003


                               Signed:     /s/  Richard A. Pomije
                                        ----------------------------------------
                               Name:    Richard A. Pomije
                               Title:   Chief Executive Officer and principal
                                        financial officer of eNetpc, Inc.
**EXHIBIT      32**

|                                     |   |   | **ECHELON                CORPORATION**                                                            |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March                16, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/                M. Kenneth Oshman                                                              |
|                                     |   |   | M.                Kenneth Oshman,Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

|                                     |   |   | **ECHELON                CORPORATION**                                                                         |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March                16, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/                Oliver R. Stanfield                                                                         |
|                                     |   |   | Oliver                R. Stanfield,Executive                Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36178-36179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 510 and 520


Animal Drugs, Feeds, and Related Products; Change of Sponsor

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal 
drug regulations to reflect the change of sponsor for two approved new 
animal drug applications (NADA's) from Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., to 
Phoenix Scientific, Inc.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 2, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. McKay, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., 131 West St., 
Danbury, CT 06810, has informed FDA that it has transferred the 
ownership of and all rights and interests in the approved NADA's 91-818 
and 94-170 (phenylbutazone tablets) to Phoenix Scientific, Inc., 3915 
South 48th St. Terrace, P.O. Box 6457, St. Joseph, MO 64506-0457. The 
agency is amending 21 CFR 510.600(c)(1) and (c)(2) to remove the 
sponsor name for Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., because the firm no longer is 
the holder of any approved NADA's. The agency also is amending 21 CFR 
520.1720a to reflect the change of sponsor.

List of Subjects

 21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

21 CFR Parts 520

    Animal drugs.
    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and 
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR parts 510 and 
520 are amended as follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as 
follows:
    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.


Sec. 510.600  [Amended]

    2. Section 510.600 Names, addresses, and drug labeler codes of 
sponsors of approved applications is amended in the table in paragraph 
(c)(1) by removing the entry for ``Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.''; and in 
the table in paragraph (c)(2) by removing the entry for ``000591''.

PART 520--ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as 
follows:
    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.


Sec. 520.1720a  [Amended]

    4. Section 520.1720a Phenylbutazone tablets and boluses is amended 
in paragraph (b)(3) by removing the numbers ``000591, 000856, 000864, 
and 015579'' and adding in their place the numbers ``000856, 000864, 
015579, and 059130''.


[[Page 36179]]


    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Margaret Ann Miller,
Acting Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for 
Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 98-17542 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
I

‘7f2 ‘1/7?

ECT0H 24 — SAMPLING AND TESTING•- RECORDS AND REPORTS

24.1 Any person operating any article, machine.

equipment, or other contrivance for which

registration is required by these Regulations,

shall permit the Control Officer, or his

agent to Install and maintain sampling arid

testing facilities as are reasonable and

necessary for measurementof emissions of air

contaminants. Where existing facilities

for sampling or testing are inadequate, the

Control Officer may, in writing, require

the Registrant to provide and maintain access

to, such facilities as are reasonably

necessary for sampling and testing purposes

by the Control Officer,or his authorized

agent, in order to secure Information

that will disclose the nature, extent, quantity,

or degree of_air contaminants discharged

Into the atmosphere from the article, machine,

equipment, or other contrivance described

In the Registration form or records.

21,.2 The owner or operator of any point source as

defined in Title 40 CFR, Part 51.1,

Paragraph (k), published In the Federal

Register onNovember 25, 1971, shall

maintain records of the nature and amounts

of emissions from such source and/or

any other, information as may be deemed necessary

by the Control Office! to determine whether

such source Is in compliance with applicable

emission limltations’orother control measures.

24.3 The information recorded shall be summarized

and reported to the Control Officer on

forms furnished by the Control Officer and

shall be submitted as part of the registration

renewal requirements as provided in Subsection

15.5 of these Regulations.

24.1, Information rec,rid by r or operator

and copies of t .p3rts

submitted to the ControlOffIcer shall be

retained by the owner or’operator for two

years after the date on ‘dilch the pertinent

report Is submitted.
‘7/3L/)

24.5 Emission data obtained pursuant to these Regula

tions from owners or operators of stationary

sources to which ar quality standards shall apply

shall be correlated with applicable emission limi

tations and other control measures and will be

available to the public during normal business

hours at the District Health Certer, 625 Shadow

Lane, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106.

at
# C_2014102EN.01004401.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS

(Case F-53/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 - Implied decision rejecting the complaint - Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action - Statement of reasons))

2014/C 102/64

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alkis Diamantopoulos (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion year.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service not to promote Mr Diamantopoulos to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service not to promote Mr Diamantopoulos to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion exercise;

| 2. | Declares that the European External Action Service is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Diamantopoulos. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that the European External Action Service is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Diamantopoulos.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 20.

1

---
# Speaker notes diversity of AAPI Americans, urges unity

/ Published May 26, 2016

The Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Defense Technical Information Center and the U.S. Strategic Command Center for Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction hosted a presentation in honor of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month May 25 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.

Guest speaker Grace Spence addressed the theme “Walk Together. Embrace Differences. Build legacies.” Spence is president of the nonprofit, nongovernmental Federal Asian Pacific American Council and works as an information technology specialist for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Spence, who immigrated to the United States from China 25 years ago, noted that the stereotype of the “passive, non-confrontational, antisocial” Asian American is “really a misconception” when applied to every member. However, she said, many Asian Americans grow up being encouraged by elders to “work hard and don’t make trouble,” which can lead some to forego opportunities in leadership, for fear of standing out.

Likewise, Spence said, she herself experienced the stereotype of the technically savvy but narrowly focused Asian when she found that even with degrees in history and international relations, she could not find work in those fields but was encouraged to look for work in the IT world — in part because employers focused on her work as a math teacher in the distant past, she said.

Asian Americans and Pacific Islander Americans are a diverse group, she noted, comprising 28 countries and 19 ethnic subgroups. As a whole, it has been the fastest-growing ethnic group for the last 10 years, she noted, and in 2040 will have doubled in size.

That said, Asian Americans and Pacific Islander Americans are less than 6 percent of the federal workforce and less than 5 percent of the Senior Executive Service, she noted. Similarly, members of these groups are “well-represented in small business, but in large businesses, their numbers are low,” she said, adding that currently, there are no Asian American CEOs of large corporations.

However, Spence encouraged Asian Americans and Pacific Islander Americans to “stay positive.” She reminded the audience, “We’re Americans. We’re in it together. We need to walk together.”

May was chosen as AAPI Heritage Month for two reasons, Spence said. The first immigrants from Japan came to America in May 1843. And the Transcontinental Railroad, built largely with Chinese immigrant labor, was completed in May 1869.
No. 10-550.

#### Florida, Petitioner v. Blaine Ross.

562 U.S. 1169, 131 S. Ct. 925,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 358.

178 L. Ed. 2d 803,

January 10, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 45 So. 3d 403.
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

### Steam Study Data Review Notes Metals and Trace Elements Analysis in Water and Waste s EPA Method 200.7 ( 1994 ) ( Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry )

1. * If reported

, note the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of the samples afte r dilution. If diluted appropriately, samples should have a TDS concentration of 0.15

- 0.2% (200.7/1.3/4.2)

.

2. For the determination of d issolved elements, samples should be filtered through a 0.45 um pore membrane filter soon after collection. The filtrate should be acidified at the laboratory with 1 to 1 nitric acid to a pH less than 2 with in two weeks of collection (200.7/8.2)

.

3. Prior to the analysis of dissolved elements, samples should be acidified with nitric acid and if a precipitate forms samples shou ld be digested using the proc edure specified in

Section 11.2 (200.7/11.1.1)

. If reported, indicate the amount of nitric acid used in the digestion and list a ny deviations noted in the lab’s digestion procedures

.

4. For the determination of total or total rec overable elements, samples should be acidified with 1 to 1 nitric acid to a pH less than 2 within two weeks of collection (200.7/8.3)

. After acidification, the sample should be mixed and allowed to sit for 16 hours, and then

con firmed to have a pH less tha n 2. If the pH was greater than or equal to 2 the sample

should be acidified, mixed, held for 16 hours, and tested again (200.7/8.3)

.

5. Prior to the analysis of total or total recoverable elements, a well mixed volume of the sample should be digested with ni tric acid and hydrochloric acid and if necessary filtered prior to analysis (200.7/11.2)

. *For FGD influent samples that contain greate r than 1% suspended solids, the laboratory should separate the solid and liquid portions of the sample and analyze each p ortion separately. If reported, indicate the amount of nitric and hydrochloric acids used in digestion and any deviations noted in the lab’s digestion procedures

.

6. A rinse blank should be used to flush the system between all solution changes

. If reported, i ndicate how many rinse blanks were run and note a ny contamination reported.

7. For aqueous samples, a field blank should be prepared and analyzed at each sample point during one of the four days of sample collection. If the analyte concentration was greater

t han the MDL, indicate the concentration. (200.7/8.5)

8. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, the result should be reported as a nondetect. List all affected samples.

9. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, the result should reported as an

estimated value. List all affected samples.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 165A22 Filed 16 June 2023 W. AVALON POTTS, derivatively on behalf of STEEL TUBE , INC

. , plaintiff

v. KEL, LLC , and RIVES & ASSOCIATES, LL C, defendants; STEEL TUBE, INC. , nominal defendant; and LEON L. RIVES, II , defendant/counterclaimant/third

- party plaintiff

v. AVALON1, LLC , third

- party defendant/counterclaimant
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 27 (a) (2) from the trial court’s order and opinion on defendants’ Rule 59 motion for a new trial and Rule 50(b) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered on 5 November 2021 by Judge Adam M. Conrad, Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases, in Superior Court, Iredell County, after the case was designated a mandatory complex business case by the Chief Justice pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 45.4( b ). Heard in the Supreme Court on 2 5 April 2023.
Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, by Mark A. Nebrig, John T. Floyd, and Benjamin E. Shook, for plaintiff

- appellee W. Avalon Potts, derivatively on behalf of Steel Tube, Inc

. , and third

-

party defendant

- appellee Avalon1, LLC. Tuggle Duggins P.A. , by Richard W. Andrews , Jeffrey S. Southerland , and Daniel D. Stratton , for d efendant

- a ppellan t s Rives & Associates, LLC, and Leon L. Rives II

. No brief filed for defendant

- appellee K EL , LLC

.P OTTS V
. K EL , LLC Opinion of the Court

- 2

- PER CURIAM

. For the reasons stated in the trial court’s 5 November 2021 order and opinion ,

we affirm the den ial of defendants’ motion for a new trial and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict

. AFFIRMED. 1

1 The order and opinion of the North Carolina Business Court, 202 1 NCBC 72 , is available a t https://www.nccourts.gov/assets/documents/opinions/2021%20NCBC%2072.pdf

.