alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        8
        
        9
        
        10 (current)
        
        11
        
        12
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        6
        
        7
        
        8
        
        9
        
        10 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC.



### v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT Complainant,

Resnondent 

### FAA Docket No.16
- 14-06

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 24, 2017. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

. Willis, Director Airport Compliance and Management Analysis

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 18 , 2017 , I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail , postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document addressed to : FOR RESPONDENT Pablo 0. Nuesch Anja li G. Patel Spiegel and McDiarmid, LLP 1875 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 FOR COMPLAINANT Benjamin H. Klein Gross 

### & Klein LLP Pier 9 , Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94111 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-600 FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0
- 1 00 FAA Regiona l Office, ANE

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Ana l ysis
No. 10-7460.

#### Anthony S. Pignataro, Petitioner v. John Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1184, 131 S. Ct. 1006,

178 L. Ed. 2d 837,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 758.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 46.
INITIAL AGENCY ETHICS ORIENTATION FOR NEW EMPLOYEES 

IAW 5 C.F.R. § 2638.703

I certify that I have been given at least one hour of official duty time and have reviewed the 

summaries of the Standards of Ethical Conduct, agency supplemental standards, and Principles 

provided. 

_______________________________________

Full Name (Printed)

_______________________________________

Signature

_______________________________________

Title/ Position/ Grade

_______________________________________

Duty Phone Number

_______________________________________

Date

Referencing Block 8 on Optional Form 8, Position Description, or by asking your supervisor, 

please indicate whether you are required to file a Confidential Financial Disclosure Report (OGE 

450).

Required: YES NO

NOTE: A new employee assuming a covered position must file the New Entrant OGE450 with 

information current as of the filing date for the preceding 12 months. This report must be filed 

within 30 days of assuming the position. You will be assigned a report through the on-line filing 

system, Financial Disclosure Management (FDM) and will receive an email with instructions as 

to how to create and submit your report. 

UPON COMPLETION, FORWARD THIS DOCUMENT, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF YOUR 

APPOINTMENT, TO THE ETHICS COUNSELOR AT YOUR SERVICING COUNSEL 

OFFICE AS INDICATED BELOW.

• DLA General Counsel, Sara Thompson

• DLA General Counsel- Europe and Africa, Calvin Boles or Julio O’Campo

• DLA General Counsel- Pacific, Leslie Chen or James Diliberti

• DLA Counsel- Aviation, Karen McClintick

• DLA Counsel- Disposition Services, James Hewitt

• DLA Counsel- Distribution, Michael Fleming

• DLA Counsel- Document Services, Bruce McCarty

• DLA Counsel- Energy, Dani Irvine or Nancy Combs

• DLA Counsel- Land and Maritime, Mike Meehan, Adam Heer or Darin Morency

• DLA Counsel- Troop Support, Sandy Guydon
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated September 14, 2009, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule and
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Quixote Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62933 effective September 4,
1998; 333-81955 effective June 30, 1999; 333-32872 effective March 21, 2000; 333-56120 effective February 23, 2001; 333-83404
effective February 26, 2002; 333-120850 effective November 30, 2004; 333-120852 effective November 30, 2004; 333-137704 effective September 29,
2006; 333-148047 effective December 13, 2007; and 333-157301 effective February 13, 2009) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-106895 effective
July 9, 2003; 333-113504 effective March 11, 2004; and 333-12345 effective March 10, 2005) of Quixote Corporation of our report dated September 14,
2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and effective operation of internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Form 10-K.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP Chicago, Illinois
September 14, 2009


---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2878-000]


Ormond Beach Power Generation, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of 
Order

June 30, 1998.
    Ormond Beach Power Generation, L.L.C. (Ormond Beach) filed an 
application for Commission authorization for market-based rates for the 
wholesale sale of electric power from an electric generating facility 
it is acquiring in Oxnard, California, and for certain waivers and 
authorizations. In particular, Ormond Beach requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by Ormond Beach. 
On June 24, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Accepting For Filing 
Tariff For Market-Based Power Sales Rates (Order), in the above-
docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 24, 1998 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Ormond Beach 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, Ormond Beach is hereby authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Ormond Beach, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Ormond 
Beach's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. . . .
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 24, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17883 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7136.

#### Donald Ray Wells, Petitioner v. Roseanne Campbell, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 833,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9659.

178 L. Ed. 2d 566,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*567Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 634.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 3b(i)
 
CONSENT OF SOLE STOCKHOLDER
OF BELL ATLANTIC - DELAWARE, INC.

The undersigned, which holds all of the outstanding stock of Bell Atlantic -
Delaware, Inc. (the "Corporation"), does hereby consent to and adopt the 
following resolution pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of 
the State of Delaware:

RESOLVED, that the By-Laws of the corporation be, and they hereby are, amended 
and restated in their entirety as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and
made a part hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned sole stockholder of Bell Atlantic - 
Delaware, Inc. has executed this consent as of the 15th day of December, 1995.

Bell Atlantic Corporation

By:
Raymond W. Smith
Chairman of the Board and 
Chief Executive
No. 10-5988.

#### Melvin Williams, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 901,

178 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 49.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 392 Ill. App. 3d 1132, 984 N.E.2d 210.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0093

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.J.W.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant has filed a motion for an extension of time within which to 

file the opening brief. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ opening brief 

shall be filed on or before June 25, 2021. 

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 3 2021

05/03/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0093
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-252-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Filing

June 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 18, 1998, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing, pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural 
Gas Act, a notice of termination of gathering service that will apply 
to gathering service provided by Sonat Exploration Company (SEC) upon 
the transfer by Southern to SEC of certain gathering facilities located 
in Bear Creek Field, Bienville Parish, Louisiana.
    Southern proposes the effective date of such termination of 
gathering services to be August 31, 1998.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17039 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 of 2

EPA’s Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act Provision Regarding Tribal 

Authority – Intergovernmental Associations Meeting

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

1:00 – 2:30 p.m. EDT

Meeting Summary

EPA Presenters: Mark Rupp – EPA, Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations 

Betsy Southerland, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Fred Leutner, EPA Office of Science and Technology 

Participants: Alex Dunn – Environmental Council of States (ECOS)

Brendan Johns- ECOS

Patrick Dolan – National Governors Association (NGA)

Alex Whitaker – NGA

Carlee Brown – Western Governors’ Association (WGA)

Chris Guard – WGA

Laura Wilkeson – WGA

Julia Anastasio – Association of Clean Water Administrators (ACWA)

Nathan Bracken – Western States Water Council (WSWC)

Tony Willardson – WSWC

The meeting began with introductions, followed by opening statements by Mark Rupp and Betsy 

Southerland. Fred Leutner then gave a presentation, “Potential Reinterpretation of a Clean Water 

Act Provision Regarding Tribal Eligibility to Administer Regulatory Programs,” available at 

EPA’s website, http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/tribal.cfm. 

The meeting continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from participants. 

Several participants requested follow-up meetings with their organizations and member states. 

EPA agreed to work with those organizations to set up such meetings. 

The following is a list of questions and comments received from participants during the meeting. For each 

of the questions, the EPA presenters provided responses that were consistent with the presentation 

materials and other information available 

at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/tribal.cfm. Views and comments 

were acknowledged, and will be considered by EPA in developing the proposed rule. 

• In general the reinterpretation sounds “eminently reasonable.” What does EPA expect to 

hear back from the states?

• No tribes have the authority to establish TMDLs. 

• There are similarities between the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act, except that there 

are more uses for CWA on tribal lands, especially related to agriculture. Are there any 

instances of how non-member fee lands would be affected by tribal WQS?
2 of 2

• Has there been EPA outreach to individual states, governors? Western governors should 

know that about this rule. The participant will follow up with Mark Rupp to ensure that 

outreach happens.

• Participants indicated that case law citations surrounding the TAS reinterpretation 

would be helpful. (Subsequent to the meeting, EPA added a link to the EPA 

Environmental Justice Legal Tools Document, which contains relevant case citations, to 

its website, http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/tribal.cfm.)
#### *Michkowski, Petitioner, v. Snohomish County, Respondent,*

No. 91682-9.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71328-1-1, February 17, 2015, 17, 2015,185 185 Wn. App. 1057. *Denied*September 30, 2015.
# Questions & Answers, Post PPC, Solicitation SPE4A2-15-R-0002

#  DLA Chemicals, Packaged Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricants (Chem/POL)
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Jean, Chery, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Freiberg, Peck &amp; Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for appellant.The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered February 26, 2014. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court denying defendant's motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the vehicle which had been involved in the accident in question.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2015/2015_51294.htm" target="_blank"><i>Tam Med. Supply Corp. v Omni Indem. Co. </i>(48 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51294[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: August 11, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 21

                     ESCALADE, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    List of Subsidiaries at December 30, 2006


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    State of Other           Percent of Voting
                                                                    Jurisdiction of          Securities Owned
                                                                     Incorporation               by Parent
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>                                <C>
  Parent
        Escalade, Incorporated                                       Indiana, USA

  Subsidiaries (1)
        Indian Industries, Inc.                                      Indiana, USA                    100%
        U.S. Weight, Inc.                                            Illinois, USA                   100%
        Harvard Sports, Inc.                                        California, USA                  100%
        Harvard California, S. DE R.L. C.V.                           B.C. Mexico                    100%
        Bear Archery, Inc.                                           Florida, USA                    100%
        Escalade Sports Playgrounds, Inc.                         North Carolina, USA                100%
        Martin Yale Industries, Inc.                                 Indiana, USA                    100%
        Productos Maestros de Oficiina, S.A. DE C.V.                  B.C. Mexico                    100%
        Schleicher & Co. America                                  North Carolina, USA                100%
        Martin Yale International, GmbH                                 Germany                      100%
        Olympia Business Systems                                  North Carolina, USA                100%
        Martin Yale International SARL                                  France                       100%
        Martin Yale International Ltd                                   England                      100%
        Taros Trading, GmbH                                             Germany                      100%
        Indian-Martin, Inc.                                           Nevada, USA                    100%
        EIM Company, Inc.                                             Nevada, USA                    100%
        SOP Services, Inc.                                            Nevada, USA                    100%
        Escalade Insurance, Inc.                                      Nevada, USA                    100%
        Desmar Seguridad Y Archivo, S.L.                                 Spain                       100%
</TABLE>

(1) Each subsidiary company so designated has been included in Consolidated
Financial Statements for all periods following its acquisition. See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                       61