alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Beechcraft Defense Company, LLC ) ) Under Contract Nos. FA8617-06-D-6150 ) FA8617-07-D-6151 ) FA8617-09-C-6166 ) FA8617-09-C-6l70 ) FA86l7-09-C-6175 ) FA8620-07-C-4010 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61550

James J. McCullough, Esq. Michael J. Anstett, Esq. Anayansi Rodriguez, Esq.

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &

Jacobson LLP Washington, DC
E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney DebraE. Berg, Esq. Stephen R. Dooley, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Contract Management Agency Boston, MA OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD On December 5, 2017, a contracting officer issued a final decision asserting a government monetary claim for alleged noncompliance ofCost Accounting Standards underthe captioned contracts. The decision was addressed to "Textron Corporation (Formerly Beechcraft Corporation)." In the notice ofappeal, counsel for appellant asserted that the proper contractorunder the captioned contracts is BeechcraftDefense Company, LLC.* Appellant subsequently moved to dismiss the appeal for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction, asserting that the final decision did not assert a claim against a "contractor" under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 

### § § 7101-7109.

* Counsel also asserted that Beechcraft Defense Company, LLC has changed its name to Textron Aviation Defense LLC and is awaiting government approval ofthe novation. 

# f


# r 

# I 

# I

f f I 

# I t 

# I lThe government does not oppose dismissal. Further, the government has notified the Board that the contracting officerrescinded the December 5, 2017 final decision and provided copies ofa final decision dated May 17, 2018, that states that the final decision dated December 5, 2017, is rescinded and replaced by the final decision dated May 17, 2018. Where a contracting officerunequivocally rescinds a final decision asserting a government claim, there is no longer any claim before the Board to adjudicate, and the Board has dismissed the appeal as moot. 

### URS Federal Support Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 60364, 17-1 BCA ,-[ 36,587 at 178,204; 

### Combat SupportAssociates, ASBCA Nos. 58945, 58946, 16-1 BCA ,-[ 36,288 at 176,973. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot.

Dated: June 7, 2018

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I concur



### L~ Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61550, Appeal ofBeechcraft Defense Company, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
For accessible content (in English): https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/resources/ads/pdf-print-ads/cdc-tips-excision-chinese-english-508.pdf
# DLA Troop Support helps Jewish service members celebrate Passover

/ Published April 21, 2016
PHILADELPHIA,
No. 10-5817.

#### Chris Jacobs, Petitioner v. Peter Huibregtse, Warden.

562 U.S. 1058, 131 S. Ct. 685,

178 L. Ed. 2d 474,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9381.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
For assistance with EMALL ordering 

or to speak with one of DLA’s 

Customer Interaction Center 

representatives:

Toll Free: 1-877-DLA-CALL

 (1-877-352-2255)

DSN: 661-7766

COM: 1-269-961-7766

To Learn More about DLA 

Aviation’s Services and Products

http://www.dla.mil/Aviation/

January 2017 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

AVIATION
Chemicals and Packaged 

Petroleum Products

DLA Aviation announces a 

new partnership with Science 

Applications International 

Corporation under a five-year base, 

five-year option incentive-based 

performance contract.

Federal Supply Classes (FSCs) 

FSC 6810 contains national stock 

numbers (NSNs) used for the 

purchase of laboratory chemicals.

FSC 6820 contains NSNs for dyes.

FSC 6840 contains NSNs for pest 

control agents and disinfectants.

FSC 6850 contains NSNs for 

miscellaneous chemical specialty 

products including re-manufactured 

toner cartridges, re-cycled 

antifreeze, cleaners and de-icers.

FSC 9150 contains NSNs for oils and 

greases including hydraulic fluids, 

transmission fluids and re-refined 

engine oil.

Contract benefits:

• Improved fill rate performance

• Delivery i/a/w UMMIPS

For assistance visit our webpage:

http://www.dla.mil/Aviation/

Offers/Products/

Commodities.aspx

To Order:

• Automated system using

MILSTRIP or FEDSTRIP

(use Standard form 344)

• Internet using a government

credit card through EMALL:

https://dod.emall.dla.mil/acct/

• Email your MILSTRIP/FEDSTRIP

order to DLA Customer

Interaction Center:

dlacontactcenter@dla.mil
LOCAL AGREEMENT - ARTICLE 31
OFFICE COMMUNICATION TOOLS
BETWEEN
DLA ACTIVITIES

HART-DOLE-INOUYE FEDERAL CENTER (HDIFC), BATTLE CREEK, MI
(Includes all bargaining unit employees in the area)

AND
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFGE), LOCAL 1626

Section 1: General

MLA Article 31, Paragraph 6, states that “any accountability rosters (e.g., sign-in/sign-out
sheets)” are subject to negotiations between parties at the local level and are authorized to be
included in Local Agreements.

Section 2:

A. The purpose of accountability rosters is to show employee availability during emergency
situations.

B. If organizations choose to use an accountability roster, the following are examples but not
limited to; sign-in/sign-out sheets; dry erase boards, phone trees, Teams availability,
Sharepoint, etc.

C. Accountability rosters will not be used as a time and attendance tool and will not display
reasons for status that are personal to the employee (examples: sick leave; doctor’s
appointment; etc.).

D. Employees will be encouraged to keep their Fourth Estate Personnel Accountability and
Assessment Systems (FEPAAS) information up to date for emergency reporting.

F Union: For Agency:
: DAM 203 MELTED 0 mots
Robin L. Nichols, President Andre Toussaint, COL. USA

American Federation of Government Employees DLA, Disposition Services-Battle Creek MI
AFGE Local 1626 HDI Federal Center
Exhibit 24













                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Electro-Catheter Corporation:



     We consent to  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statement
(No.33-56016)  on Form S-8 of  Electro-Catheter  Corporation of our report dated
November  7, 1996  except as to the third  paragraph  of Note 7,  which is as of
December  16,  1996,  relating   to   the  balance  sheets  of  Electro-Catheter
Corporation  as of August  31,  1996 and 1995,  and the  related  statements  of
operations,  stockholders' equity and cash flows and related financial statement
schedules for each of the years in the three-year  period ended August 31, 1996,
which  report  appears  in the  August 31,  1996  annual  report on Form 10-K of
Electro-Catheter Corporation.



                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
December 16, 1996
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40310

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN PEREZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-891-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan PerezMartinez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 10-6017.

#### Lynn Eugene Scott, Petitioner v. Mr. Urlich, et al.

562 U.S. 1202, 131 S. Ct. 1042,

178 L. Ed. 2d 867,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 988.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 970.
No. 10-7079.

#### Jeffrey L. Miller, Petitioner v. Michael Wenerowicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville, et al.

562 U.S. 1144, 131 S. Ct. 916,

178 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 240.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-341.

#### Precision Pine & Timber, Inc., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1178, 131 S. Ct. 997,

178 L. Ed. 2d 826,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 733.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 817.
No. 10-237.

#### Craig Buonora, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Police Officer, Petitioner v. Darryl T. Coggins.

562 U.S. 1194, 131 S. Ct. 995,

178 L. Ed. 2d 854,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 673.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 224.
No. 10-6603.

#### Geoffrey L. Rashaw-Bey, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1040,

178 L. Ed. 2d 859,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 614.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 444, 178 L. Ed. 2d 341, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8209.
বিদেদে িন্ধুও পবিিাদিি সাদে দেখা

কিদেন?

বনণজণক টাইফণয়ড জ্বর দেণক সুরবষিে রাখুন!

টাইফদেড জ্বি একটি গুিুতি, প্াণ-সংেেকািী দিাগ

• এটি পূি্বও েবষিণ এবেো (বিদেষ কদি পাবকস্ান, ভািত, ও িাংলাদেে),

আবরিকা, ক্াবিবিোন, মধ্ ও েবষিণ আদমবিকা, এিং মধ্ প্াদ্্ খধুিই

সাধািণ।

• এইসকল অঞ্চদল ভ্রমণকািীদেি টাইফদেড জ্বি হওোি অবধকতি ঝধু

ঁবক

আদে।

• টাইফদেড জ্বি প্ােেই অবনিাপে খািাি ও পাবনি মাধ্দম েবিদে পদি।

বনম্নবলবখত পিামে্বগুবলি সাহাদ্্ বনিাপে োকধুন:

আপনাি সফদিি আদগ

• টাইফদেড জ্বদিি টিকা বনন।

» আপনার টিকাকরণের বিকল্পগুবি আণিাচনা করণে ভ্রমণের অন্তর 2 সপ্াহ

আণে আপনার ডাক্াণরর সাণে দেখা করুন।

আপনাি সফদিি সমদে

• ঘন ঘন সািান ও পাবন বেদে আপনাি হাত ধধুদে বনন।

• খাওো ও পান কিাি বনিাপে অভ্াসগুবল অনধুেীলন কিুন।

» খাওয়ার আণে খািার দসদ্ধ করুন, রান্া করুন, িা খািাণরর দখাসা ছাড়ান।

» শুধুমাত্র দিােিজাে িা 1 বমবনট (6,500 ফুণটর দিবি উচ্চোয় 3 বমবনট)

দফাটাণনা হণয়ণছ এমন জি পান করুন।

» িরফযুক্ পানীয় এবড়ণয় চিুন।

» একজন অসুস্থ িা সম্প্রবে অসুস্থ হওয়া ি্যবক্র দ্ারা প্রস্তুে করা খািার

খাণিন না।

www.cdc.gov/typhoid-fever/prevention.html

CS 315761-D
No. 10-7945.

#### Stevie West, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1028,

178 L. Ed. 2d 850,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 617.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 993.
No. 10-5558.

#### Gail P. Bates, Petitioner v. Morrison Management Specialists, Inc.

562 U.S. 1006, 131 S. Ct. 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8637.

178 L. Ed. 2d 375,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*376Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 771.
EXHIBIT 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Lawrence N. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Resource Bankshares Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August 11, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Lawrence N. Smith
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                      |  |  |  | Lawrence N. Smith    



29
No. 09-10968.

#### Po Kee Wong, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1196, 131 S. Ct. 1041,

178 L. Ed. 2d 860,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 626.

January 18, 2011.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 126, 178 L. Ed. 2d 76, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6205.
No. 10-6043.

#### Frederick Bell, Petitioner v. Christopher B. Epps, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1066, 131 S. Ct. 645,

178 L. Ed. 2d 487,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9095.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 347 Fed. Appx. 73.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        7
        
        8
        
        9
        
        10
        
        11 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

30 CFR Part 206

RIN 1010-AC09


Establishing Oil Value for Royalty Due on Federal Leases

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reopening the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) hereby gives notice that 
it is reopening the public comment period on a second supplementary 
proposed rulemaking, which was published in the Federal Register on 
February 6, 1998, (63 FR 6113). The proposed rule amends the royalty 
valuation regulations for crude oil produced from Federal leases. In 
response to issues raised on the February 6, 1998, second supplementary 
proposed rulemaking, MMS will reopen the comment period from July 9, 
1998, to July 24, 1998.

DATE: Comments must be submitted on or before July 24, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments, suggestions, or objections about this 
supplementary proposed rule to: Minerals Management Service, Royalty 
Management Program, Rules and Publications Staff, P.O. Box 25165, MS 
3021, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165. E-mail address is 
RMP.<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7714181a1a12190304371a1a0459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99faf6f4f4fcf7edead9f4f4eab7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David S. Guzy, Chief, Rules and 
Publications Staff, telephone number (303) 231-3432, fax (303) 231-
3385, e-mail RMP.<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f695999b9b93988285b69b9b85d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adcec2c0c0c8c3d9deedc0c0de83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MMS is reopening the comment period for the 
February 6 second supplementary proposed rulemaking for a two-week 
period from July 9 to July 24. All comments received during this 
comment period will be posted on MMS's web site at <a href="http://
www.rmp.mms.gov/library/readroom/readrm.htm">http://
www.rmp.mms.gov/library/readroom/readrm.htm</a>. It is unnecessary to 
resubmit comments previously submitted regarding this rulemaking.

    Dated: July 2, 1998.
Phillip D. Sykora,
Acting Associate Director for Royalty Management.
[FR Doc. 98-18051 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the interim
financial statements for the nine month period ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      896
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (73)
<INVENTORY>                                        253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,513
<PP&E>                                           4,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,825
<SALES>                                         12,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,950
<CGS>                                           10,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (33)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (130)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     55
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (75)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.050)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.050)


</TABLE>
No. 10-7427.

#### Waquita Wallace, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 840,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9725,

178 L. Ed. 2d 570,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 477.