alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 25, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
D. Frandsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ TERRY FRANDSEN
----------------------------------------------
Terry D. Frandsen
Chief Financial Officer

March 9, 2007


                                       64
## NUMBER 13
- 20
- 00 290
- CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

EX PARTE S.H.

On a ppeal from the 54 th District Court of McLennan County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam

This cause is before us on State’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on mootness, as appellant has pled to the underlying case and is no longer held on pre

- trial
bail which is the basis for this appeal. This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37 .3(a)(1). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is CARRIED with the case, and this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means2 necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether appellant can be located; (2) whether appellant has abandoned his appeal; and (3) if any other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of appellant’s appeal.
The trial court shall cause its find ing s and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepare d. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from
the date of this order.
PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 22nd day of April , 202 1

.
**EXHIBIT 32**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Double Eagle PetroleumCompany (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, each of Stephen H. Hollis, theChief Executive Officer, and David C. Milholm, Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: March 31, 2005 /s/ Stephen H. Hollis          Stephen H. Hollis,          Chief Executive Officer and        /s/ David C. Milholm   David C. Milholm,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0422 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACK ELDON JARVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 28 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 24 2020

11/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0422
LAX 

LAJOntario 

Van Nuys 

Los Angeles 

World Airports 

May 22, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

City of Los Angeles 

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), and the Los Angeles region as a whole, 

realize great economic benefit from competition in international air travel. LAX is 

an economic driver for Southern California, serving 70.7 million passengers per 

year, 27% of those on international flights, with nonstop service to 67 cities in 34 

countries on over 60 passenger air carriers. LAX is a truly competitive airport, 

with no one airline serving more than 20% of the passengers. 

c <_:1.-n,·eni 

f\1.'1\.'r'r 

Board of Airport 

Con1rnissioners 

>~f'c1 rr () 

;)r,·:;•:k·'t 

V:\k'rt,-~ c Vd<t~·LO 

V·ct.' f't·c~~ldcr:· 

G:1hnd 1 r_:"I\<H.'Jt, ., 

ldcl<.l~ fJoi<H)er ~ 

fl'C,'•ll,u· C H'u 

r\.t'J!tfiC\',' f·_.·1. !olri c.,~~n 

'>• C)ll'•tll.n .D.. T0!le~·, 

rvld'll ... li11d~;c;y 

f:>:N:rlti·v·e DrrPctnr 

The value of international air service is without question. A 2007 economic study 

by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation indicated that 

each daily transoceanic flight resulted in over $623 million in economic output 

and sustained 3120 direct and indirect jobs. LAX is an outstanding example of 

the economic benefit of robust competition in international aviation. 

In order to keep this economic engine running, there should be as few regulatory 

impediments as possible to the addition of new overseas flights. Improving 

airline competition is good for the Los Angeles region and the nation as a whole. 

The current Open Skies Agreements should be preserved as they encourage 

economic growth, give travelers valuable choice, and open new markets for 

travel and trade. 

Los Angeles World Airports respectfully requests that you not restrict airline 

competition and preserve the nation's existing Open Skies agreements. 

Sin~ reA 

ina Marie Lindsey 

Executive Director 

cc: The Honorable Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce, U.S. 

Department of Commerce 

The Honorable John Kerry, Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State 

M<'lil
# Human resources helps employees affected by retirement payment mistakes

/ Published June 14, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
More than 23,000 Defense Department employees, including 2,100 from the Defense Logistics Agency, over- or under-paid into their retirement funds. 

The good news: DLA Human Resources has already contacted impacted DLA employees and is helping resolve any problems, said Frank Yacono, DLA’s director of enterprise support.

“If you haven’t been contacted, you don’t have any issues,” he said.

All affected employees are in the Federal Employees Retirement System.

DLA learned about the issue from the Defense Civilian Personnel Advisory Service in late November and started reaching out to affected employees in January through phone calls and letters, he said.

Human resources officials had spoken with every impacted employee by early May and began helping them work with Defense Finance Accounting Service for resolutions, especially those who may owe money.

“It’s a scary situation when you are potentially indebted to the government, but that’s why we’re here, to walk the employees through the steps,” Yacono said.

According to published reports, calculation errors resulted from two changes in retirement contribution rates for FERS employees made by Congress in 2012 and 2014. DOD agencies assigned some employees to the wrong FERS retirement plan – at no fault of the employees – causing the incorrect contribution rates.

Employees who are still unsure whether they’re impacted or have other questions can contact a DLA Employee Benefits specialist or visit the DLA Human Resources website.
# C_2016454EN.01000702.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/7

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Romonta GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-565/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))

(2016/C 454/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Romonta GmbH (represented by: I. Zenke and M.-Y. Vollmer, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Romonta GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Romonta GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

---
EXHIBIT 12.01

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY

COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in Thousands)



|                                        |  |                          |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | - |  | ------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ------ | -
|                                        |  | Years Ended December 31, |  
|                                        |  | 2009                     |   |  | 2008    |   |  | 2007    |   |  | 2006    |   |  | 2005   |  
|Earnings from Continuing Operations (a) |  | 99,977                   |   |  | 115,451 |   |  | 109,220 |   |  | 87,453  |   |  | 55,204 |  
|Fixed Charges (b)                       |  |                          |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|Interest charges                        |  | 50,908                   |   |  | 48,813  |   |  | 37,648  |   |  | 36,744  |   |  | 41,461 |  
|Interest portion of rent expense        |  | 929                      |   |  | 1,085   |   |  | 1,181   |   |  | 1,186   |   |  | 1,251  |  
|                                        |  |                          |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|Total Fixed Charges                     |  | 51,837                   |   |  | 49,898  |   |  | 38,829  |   |  | 37,930  |   |  | 42,712 |  
|Capitalized Interest                    |  | (16,283                  | ) |  | (15,872 | ) |  | (11,897 | ) |  | (4,907  | ) |  | (5,783 | )
|                                        |  |                          |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|Earnings (c)                            |  | 135,531                  |   |  | 149,477 |   |  | 136,152 |   |  | 120,476 |   |  | 92,133 |  
|                                        |  |                          |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |        |  
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges      |  | 2.6                      |   |  | 3.0     |   |  | 3.5     |   |  | 3.2     |   |  | 2.2    |  



|(a) | Earnings from continuing operations consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes, extraordinary item and cumulative effects of accounting changes.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Fixed charges consist of all interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense and the estimated portion of rental expense that represents an interest
factor.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Earnings consist of earnings from continuing operations and fixed charges less AFUDC and capitalized interest.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
(23)  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-64639, 33-34807, 333-130075 and 333-130076) and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-152729 and 333-141452)
of The Empire District Electric Company of our report dated February 19,
2010 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.   /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  St.
Louis, Missouri February 19,
2010
EXHIBIT (31)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gregory A. Knapp, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Empire District Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
March 3, 2008

|By: |  | /s/ Gregory A. Knapp
|--- |  | --------------------

|Name:  |  | Gregory A. Knapp                                    
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Title: |  | Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-411.

#### William M. Windsor, Petitioner v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 655,

178 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9157,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5250

_____________________________ C LAUDE L AMITE B ULLARD , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

. November 28, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney G eneral, and Kaitlin Weiss Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Vote  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  September 30,  2005
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities  as
Chief Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 30, 2005             By:  /S/ Bob Martyn
                                   -------------------------
                                   Bob Martyn
                                   President
                                   (principal executive officer)



Dated: December 30, 2005             By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          82,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,225,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   192,900
<INVENTORY>                                 10,048,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,502,287
<PP&E>                                       1,294,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 445,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,365,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,092,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,084,848
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,188,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,365,369
<SALES>                                     21,239,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,239,507
<CGS>                                        8,396,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,945,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,255,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,634,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,004,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,630,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,630,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-11126.

#### J. Doe, Petitioner v. Richard L. Duncan, et al.

562 U.S. 1058, 131 S. Ct. 684,

178 L. Ed. 2d 473,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9344.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
# C_2014315EN.01007401.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/74

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 16 July 2014 — Klar and Fernandez Fernandez v Commission

(Case F-114/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Commission’s staff committee - Central committee - Appointment of members of the Luxembourg local section to the central staff committee - Revocation by the local section of the authority of one of its members appointed to the central committee - Refusal by the appointing authority to recognise the lawfulness of the revocation decision - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Complaint out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/124

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Robert Klar (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) and Francisco Fernandez Fernandez (Steinsel, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the appointing authority refusing to recognise the lawfulness of the decision of the Luxembourg local staff committee revoking the authority granted to a person mandated to represent it within the Commission’s central staff committee.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Klar and Mr Fernandez Fernandez are to bear their own costs and are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Klar and Mr Fernandez Fernandez are to bear their own costs and are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014, p. 53.

1

---