alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013129EN.01002701.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/27

---

Action brought on 7 March 2013 — Saferoad RRS v OHIM (MEGARAIL)

(Case T-137/13)

2013/C 129/52

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saferoad RRS GmbH (Weroth, Germany) (represented by C. Czychowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2013 in Case R 2536/2011-4 and the Examiner’s decision of 23 November 2011 in so far as the mark was rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2013 in Case R 2536/2011-4 and the Examiner’s decision of 23 November 2011 in so far as the mark was rejected;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘MEGARAIL’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 19 and 37

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
#### *State, Respondent, v. Moreno Vargas, Petitioner,*

No. 92061-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 45568-4-II, July 7, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 1040. *Denied*January 6, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-288-000]


Michigan Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Michigan Gas Storage Company 
(MGSCo) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, (First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 1, Second Revised Sheet 
No. 54A and Original Sheet No. 72) with an effective date of August 1, 
1998.
    MGSCo states that the proposed sheets are being filed pursuant to 
Order No. 587-G, regarding GISB standards.
    MGSCo states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
customers and applicable state regulatory agencies and on all those on 
the official service list in Docket No. RP97-152-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18377 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2601

Lower Tribunal No. 22-CA-007513-O

_____________________________

FOREMAN ELECTRIC SERVICES, INC.,

Appellant, 

v.

LSQ FUNDING GROUP, L.C.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Vincent Falcone, III, Judge.

June 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WHITE, MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Jerome Ramsaran, of Jerome Ramsaran, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Emily J. Lang and Kevin D. Fowler, of Foley & Lardner LLP, Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
**EXHIBIT 21**

**QUIXOTECORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIESSUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANYas of June 30, 2005**
| **QUIXOTE  CORPORATION (PARENT)**                         | ** ** | ** **          | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  Under Which  Organized** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| Quixote Transportation  Safety, Inc.                 |       | Delaware            |
| TranSafe Corporation                                      |       | Delaware            |
| Nu-Metrics, Inc.                                     |       | Pennsylvania        |
| Highway Information  Systems, Inc.                   |       | Delaware            |
| Surface  Systems, Inc.                               |       | Missouri            |
| Sensing Systems, Ltd.                                     |       | United Kingdom      |
| U.S. Traffic Corporation                                  |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Transportation  Safety Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.  |       | Mexico              |
| Energy Absorption  Systems, Inc.                     |       | Delaware            |
| E-Tech Testing  Services, Inc.                       |       | Delaware            |
| Spin-Cast  Plastics, Inc.                            |       | Indiana             |
| Energy Absorption  Systems (Europe), Inc.            |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Transportation  Safety (Asia Pacific) Pty Limited |       | Australia           |
| Quixote Transportation Safety  (Asia Pacific), Inc.  |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Transportation  Safety (Europe), Inc.        |       | Delaware            |
| Energy Absorption  Systems (AL) LLC                       |       | Delaware            |
| Peek Traffic Corporation                                  |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Traffic  Corporation                              |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Transportation  Technologies, Inc.           |       | Delaware            |
| Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation                         |       | U.S. Virgin Islands |

 

Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc., QuixoteTraffic Corporation, Quixote Transportation Technologies, Inc. and QuixoteForeign Sales Corporation are wholly-owned by Quixote Corporation.

TranSafe Corporation, Surface Systems, Inc., U.S.Traffic Corporation, Peek Traffic Corporation and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc.are wholly-owned by Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

All subsidiaries listed under TranSafe Corporation,Surface Systems, Inc. and Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. arewholly-owned by those corporations.

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Membership of the Commission's Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Membership Change of Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Office of Personnel Management guidance 
under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, notice is hereby given that 
the following employees will serve as members of the Commission's 
Performance Review Board.
    Chairperson: Linda Ferren, Executive Director. Members: Susan G. 
Lee, Executive Assistant to the Chairperson; Daniel Waldman, General 
Counsel; Steven Manaster, Director, Division of Economic Analysis; 
Geoffrey Aronow, Director, Division of Enforcement; I. Michael 
Greenberger, Director, Division of Trading and Markets.

DATES: This action will be effective on July 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of Human 
Resources and Support Services, Three Lafayette Centre, Suite 4100, 
Washington, D.C. 20581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Linnertz, Director, Office of Human Resources and Support Services, 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of Human Resources and 
Support Services, Three Lafayette Centre, Suite 4100, Washington, D.C. 
20581, (202) 254-3275.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: This action which changes the membership of 
the Board supersedes the previously published Federal Register Notice, 
September 11, 1997.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-17498 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 10-7714.

#### Rod Schultz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1159, 131 S. Ct. 961,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 267.

178 L. Ed. 2d 792,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 842.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-308-000]


Algonquin LNG, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Algonquin LNG, Inc. (ALNG) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective August 1, 
1998:

Third Revised Sheet No. 83.

    ALNG asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 587-G, Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines issued on April 16, 1998 in Docket No. 
RM96-1-007, 83 FERC para. 61,029 (1998). ALNG asserts that the revised 
tariff sheet included herewith reflects Version 1.2 standards 
promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board which were adopted by 
the Commission and incorporated by reference in the Commission's 
Regulations.
    ALNG states that copies of the filing were served on all affected 
customers, interested state commissions and all parties to the 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18358 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANC CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,589
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,232
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    20
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     84,066
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,931
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,821
<LOANS>                                        751,315
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 955,541
<DEPOSITS>                                     783,700
<SHORT-TERM>                                       138
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,081
<LONG-TERM>                                     77,640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 955,541
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 49,319
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   627
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                54,081
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,803
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,339
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,742
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,466
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  73
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,193
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,463
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,463
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.34
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,962
<LOANS-PAST>                                       600
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,065
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,036
<RECOVERIES>                                       386
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,879
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,879
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 10-6590.

#### Danny Ray Meeks, Petitioner v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1207, 131 S. Ct. 1064,

178 L. Ed. 2d 878,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 992.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 687, 178 L. Ed. 2d 489, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9174.
No. 10-7253.

#### Antonio Davis, Petitioner v. Michigan.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 929,

178 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 231.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
No. 10-6880.

#### Judith Glory Riton, aka Judith Glory Riten, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 825,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9632.

178 L. Ed. 2d 563,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Sanchez-Balbuena, Petitioner,*

No. 92181-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 71653-1-I, July 27, 2015, 189 Wn. App. 1006. *Denied*February 10, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36218-36219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-625-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 26, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 19, 1998, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking), 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55117, filed in Docket 
No. CP98-625-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205, and 157.212, of 
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.212) for authorization to add a new delivery point to accommodate 
natural gas deliveries to Wisconsin Gas (Wisconsin) in Polk County, 
Wisconsin under Viking's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP88-
679-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Viking states that Wisconsin has requested metering capacities to 
accommodate up to 3,600 Dth of gas per day at the Black Brook delivery 
point. Viking states that the new delivery point will not exceed 
contract quantities, and the changes proposed are not prohibited by 
Viking's tariff. They also state that they have sufficient capacity in 
its system to accomplish delivery of gas to the proposed delivery point 
without detriment or disadvantage to Viking's other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for

[[Page 36219]]

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17581 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2014071EN.01000701.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 3 December 2013 — Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

(Case C-633/13)

(2014/C 71/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

Question referred

Must Article 13(1) of Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) (1) be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of obligations relating to price controls, national regulatory authorities may impose on operators with significant market power an obligation consisting in a prohibition on the application of excessive voice call termination rates in the telephone network of such operators?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 7.

---
---



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF PAUL O. WILLIAMS, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nexplore Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  June 12, 2007 | /s/   PAUL O. WILLIAMS     
|-------------------- | ---------------------------
|                     | Paul O. Williams           
|                     | Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 10-7651.

#### Jose Luis Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 956,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 578.

178 L. Ed. 2d 788,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 495.