alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015205EN.01000802.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco — Spain) — Subdelegación del Gobierno en Gipuzkoa — Extranjería v Samir Zaizoune

(Case C-38/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Articles 6(1) and 8(1) - National legislation providing, in the event of illegal staying, for either a fine or removal, depending on the circumstances))

(2015/C 205/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Gipuzkoa — Extranjería

Appellant:

Respondent: Samir Zaizoune

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, in particular, Articles 6(1) and Article 8(1), read in conjunction with Article 4(2) and (3), must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides, in the event of third-country nationals illegally staying in the territory of that Member State, depending on the circumstances, for either a fine or removal, since the two measures are mutually exclusive.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.

1

---
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 454 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. NEIL LYNN NUNES ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 4 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 24 2024

01/24/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD08-98-034]
RIN 2115-AE46


Special Local Regulations; Head of the Ohio, Allegheny River Mile 
0.0-3.3

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements 33 CFR 100.201, ``Annual marine events 
within the Second Coast Guard District'', Table One, number 79, listed 
as ``Head of the Ohio''. In 1996, the Second Coast Guard District was 
disestablished, and the Eighth District boundaries were expanded to 
include the prior Second District area of responsibility. The Eighth 
District Commander now exercises authority over the combined 
geographical region. 61 FR 29958 (June 13, 1996). This event will be 
held on October 3, 1998 at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Implementation of 
section 33 CFR 100.201 (Table One, 79) is necessary to provide for the 
safety of life on navigable waters during the event.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.201 (Table One, 79) is effective from 7 a.m. until 6 
p.m. on October 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LT T.J. Ferring, Marine Safety Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Tel: (412) 644-
5808.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Head of the Ohio is a river festival 
sponsored by the Pittsburgh Mercy Foundation. These special local 
regulations permit the Coast Guard to control vessel traffic in order 
to ensure the safety of spectators and participants. Spectators will be 
able to view the event from areas designated by the sponsor. Non-
participating vessels will be able to transit the area during breaks 
between scheduled events.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
A.L. Gerfin, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist. Acting.
[FR Doc. 98-17650 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOUSSA NDIAYE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71558

Agency No. A077-383-406

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Moussa Ndiaye, a native and citizen of Mauritania, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings

conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

MAR 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71558

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321

F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ndiaye’s motion to

reopen where written notice of the hearing was mailed to the most recent address

provided by Ndiaye and he admitted to receiving the notice, see 8 U.S.C.

§§ 1229(c), 1229a(b)(5)(A), and where Ndiaye also failed to establish that his

failure to appear was because of “exceptional circumstances,” see 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229a(e)(1).

In his opening brief, Ndiaye fails to address, and therefore has waived any

challenge to, the BIA’s determination that he failed to provide previously

unavailable evidence or evidence of changed country conditions relevant to his

asylum application. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.

1996). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
S16Y0873.

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID P. HARTIN.

(785 SE2d 541)

Decided April 26, 2016.

*Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William J. Cobb, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of David P Hartin (State Bar No. 333775) to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law. Hartin admits that, in connection with the representation of a client in a divorce action, he received proceeds from the sale of the marital home and was required by the final decree to disburse the funds equally to his client and his client’s ex-wife, but he failed to disburse the sale proceeds as directed by the final decree. He admits that by his conduct he has violated Rule 1.15 (I) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, which is punishable by disbarment. He also states that he has not practiced law since August 2015.

The State Bar has filed a response recommending that the Court accept the petition. We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Hartin’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment, see Bar Rule 4-110 (f). Accordingly, the name of David P Hartin is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Hartin is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hines, P. J., not participating.*
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) certify (i) that the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Greg G. Gruber
                                       Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                       Officer and Treasurer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

                                       March 27, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      989
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         68
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,629
<PP&E>                                           7,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,464
<BONDS>                                          2,119    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    340
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.27    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.18   
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00121

- CR

GEORGE VILLARREAL CRUZ v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10

- CRF

- 0526

- S1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE EMONS
TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000032666
<NAME> EMONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,092,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,086,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   218,619
<INVENTORY>                                    273,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,969,992
<PP&E>                                      41,798,132
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,052,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,642,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,472,344
<BONDS>                                     13,382,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,523
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,871,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,642,045
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,247,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,569,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,138,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,795,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,102,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,693,989
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,693,989
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
1

- Kosher, Halal and Kosher for Passover are DVD*

items, not depot stocked

- Kosher & Halal – 2 yrs shelf life, Passover- 1 yr

- Kosher & Passover vendor Labriute Meals in 

Lakewood, NJ

- Halal vendor SOPAKCO in Mullins, SC. They also 

do MRE, TOTM, MCW, FSR, MOREs

- Leadtime CONUS is 10-28 days and OCONUS 

90-150 days (Hawaii & Alaska 45-60 days)

Rations: Religious Meals

* DVD = Direct Vendor Delivery. Meals are produced and made to order and 

shipped directly from the vendor to the customer. MREs, in contrast, are depot 

stocked items. Orders are made and meals ship from the depot to the customer.
2

Lessons Learned

- Order as early as is feasible to ensure 

success.

- Navy MUST submit a street mailing 

address CONUS/OCONUS with FPO. 

- Confirm that DLA Delivery is shipping 

OCONUS commercial air shipments per 

the DTR and customs advisories

Kosher for Passover Meals
3

* PRIMARY DLA TROOP SUPPORT RATIONS POC: Joe Zanolle, 

Joseph.Zanolle@dla.mil, 215-737-5648

• Order Kosher and Halal just as you would order the MRE. Requisitions are 

processed according to the supply procedures for each Military Service IAQ 

their installation/state/command food program management office SOPs. If you 

use STORES*, order Kosher and Halal in STORES.

• If you don’t use STORES, Mr. Zanolle can manually process the order if you 

email him the following:

-Bill To DODAAC

-Ship To DODAAC- order will be ship to the address linked to the DODAAC

-FUND Code

-NSN (Kosher is 8970-01-424-1996 and Halal is 8970-01-424-1998)

-Quantity

-A good POC, phone and email

ORDERING RELIGIOUS MEALS

• STORES = Subsistence Total Order and Receipt Electronic System (used by Army 

and USMC):

https://www.stores.dla.mil/stores_web/Admin_Logon.aspx
4

* ORDERING LEAD TIMES (estimated):

• Kosher and Halal are not stocked. They are made to order by vendors on the 

East Coast. 

• East Coast 10-14 business days

• Central and Mountain 14-21 business days

• West Coast 21-28 business days

• Hawaii & Alaska is 45-60 days

• OCONUS is 90-150 days depending on where they need to go and the qty 

ordered

• If you are in EUCOM, CENTCOM, AFRICOM your ordered is to be 

submitted to the DLA Europe & Africa Team and then they will coordinate 

with Mr. Zanolle. They have a customer order form to be filled out.

• -Cline, Avrion L TSgt USAF DLA (USA) Avrion.Cline@dla.mil

• -Danley, Dustin F CIV DLA TROOP SUPPORT (USA) Dustin.Danley@dla.mil

• -Fielder, Robert Brian (Rob) CIV DLA TROOP SUPPORT (USA) 

Robert.Fielder@dla.mil; 

• -TRP SPT E&A OPRATs Team DLATRPSPTOPRATSTeam@dla.mil

• CONUS you can send direct to Mr. Zanolle.

ORDERING RELIGIOUS MEALS
5

See this link for a collection of information on ordering religious meals 

for the Military Services:

https://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationa

l-rations/relkoshhal/

INFORMATIONAL WEBSITE FOR 

RELIGIOUS MEALS
6

See AR 30-22 on the Army Food Program (July 

2019). Here’s a few pertinent snapshots:

ARMY GUIDANCE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the year
ending June-30-1998 10-K filing and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         191,739
<SECURITIES>                                 2,400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,155,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,788,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,309,658
<PP&E>                                      12,344,139
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,160,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,574,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,980
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       504,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,690,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,574,108
<SALES>                                     10,793,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,793,572
<CGS>                                       10,107,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,107,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,436,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,154,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (415,370)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (739,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (739,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Summary of Executive Bonus Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
  
 SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN 
  
 The following is a summary of the executive bonus plan as adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Micromuse Board of Directors in October 2003 for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2004. 
  
 In fiscal year 2004, Micromuse’s Chief
Executive Officer, Lloyd Carney, and Chief Financial Officer, Mike Luetkemeyer, were considered eligible for performance-based variable compensation based on their achievement of revenue and earnings-per-share targets established in advance by the
Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. These executives were considered eligible for increases in the amounts of their bonuses for quarters in which revenue backlog increased to pre-determined levels. Actual payout of these
bonuses for the executives was processed in accordance with these parameters, with authorization from the Compensation Committee. 
  
 Other Micromuse executive officers were also eligible to receive variable compensation (bonus) awards based on their achievement of specific operational goals set each
quarter by Mr. Carney. Upon completion of each quarter, goal achievement was rated by Mr. Carney and subsequent bonus payout levels were calculated and paid.
No. 10-7660.

#### Mike Perez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 957,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 354.

178 L. Ed. 2d 789,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Kennedy, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viking Systems, Inc.








Date: May 5, 2010
/s/ John KennedyJohn KennedyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-7290.

#### In re Harold Cage, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1059, 131 S. Ct. 682,

178 L. Ed. 2d 516,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9071,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 10-523.

#### Brian S. Zahn, Petitioner v. John McHugh, Secretary of the Army.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 831,

178 L. Ed. 2d 558,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9666.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 753.