alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-7540.

#### David N. Grant, Petitioner v. Patricia M. Barnhart, Warden.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 948,

178 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 108.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 616 F.3d 72.
No. 10-174.

#### American Electric Power Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Connecticut, et al.

562 U.S. 1091, 131 S. Ct. 813,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9461.

178 L. Ed. 2d 530,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 309.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36655-36656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 98-034N]


Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is making 
available for purchase the revised, 1998, 3rd edition of the 
Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Richard P. Mageau, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Office of Public 
Health and Science, Microbiology Division, Room 3714--Franklin Court, 
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Microbiology Division of the Office of 
Public Health and Science, FSIS, announces the availability for 
purchase of the revised, 1998, 3rd edition of the Microbiology 
Laboratory Guidebook. The Guidebook contains current protocols for 
analytical tests required by FSIS in its regulation of meat, poultry 
and egg products. Specifically, microbiological methods are presented 
for sample preparation, isolation and identification of the major food 
borne pathogenic microorganisms and their toxins, meat tissue species 
identification, and the detection of extraneous materials and 
antimicrobial residues. Media and reagent formulations, and Most 
Probable Number Tables are contained in an appendix.
    This document may be purchased as the Microbiology Laboratory 
Guidebook, 3rd edition, 1998, stock #001-000-04656-0, at a price of 
$57.00 Domestic and $71.25 Foreign from:
    Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 
371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954, (Fax) 202-512-2233.


[[Page 36656]]


    Done in Washington, DC on: June 26, 1998.
Thomas J. Billy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-17838 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P
No. 10-5119.

#### Lester Erwin Carroll, IV, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1110, 131 S. Ct. 819,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9762.

178 L. Ed. 2d 560,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Jackson, Petitioner,*

No. 91206-8.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44279-5-II, December 16, 2014, 185 Wn. App. 1001. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
No. 10-6189.

#### Ralph John Prepetit, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 1011, 131 S. Ct. 523,

178 L. Ed. 2d 386,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8604,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00437

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L. C., M. C., J. E. S., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Live Oak County , Texas Trial Cause No. L

- 11

- 0164

- CV

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No c osts are assessed as appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 19, 2013
No. 10-6133.

#### Wilfredo Schery, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1169, 131 S. Ct. 902,

178 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 24.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-7006.

#### James Lamont Miller, Petitioner v. Willie O. Smith, Warden.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 669,

178 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9079.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 508.
Amendment No. 1
                                       To
                      Agreement and Plan of Reorganization


     This Amendment No1 to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of
November 15, 2004 ("Original Agreement") between TAG Entertainment, Inc., Power
Marketing, Inc. and PMKT Subsidiary Corp. is entered into as of October 29,
2004.

     For good and valuable consideration, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. Reference is made to the Original Agreement. The parties hereby amend
and modify the Original Agreement and specifically Section 2(d)(2) thereof, to
provide that it shall be a condition to closing that not more than 2% of the
outstanding shares of TAG Entertainment, Inc. shall exercise their dissenters
rights under Section 1300 and sequential under the California General
Corporation Law. The parties may, in their discretion, waive such condition in
whole or in part.

     2. The reference in Section 2(c) (1) to the number 23,900,000 shares of
PMKT Common Stock to be received by the holders of TAG Common Stock is hereby
reduced to 21,450,000 shares. Further, the exchange ratio shall include all
outstanding shares of TAG Common Stock and the outstanding warrants of TAG.

     3. Al other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     The parties have duly authorized and executed this Agreement as of October
29, 2004.


POWER MARKETING, INC.                 PMKT SUBSIDIARY CORP.


By:                                   By:
   ---------------------------           ---------------------------------------
John Furlong                          John Furlong
President                             President


TAG ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


By:
Steve Austin, President, Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. Marc Gross 

Fireaway Inc. 

5852 Baker Road 

Minnetonka, MN 55345 

FEB 0 6 2014 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for Stat-X/Aero-K Condensed 

Aerosol System in Fire Suppression 

Dear Mr. Gross: 

Thank you for Fireaway Inc.'s submission to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 

Stat-X/Aero-K Condensed Aerosol System in fire suppression. EPA established the Significant 

New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program to implement section 612 of the Clean Air Act. In 

2006, SNAP published a final rule finding Powdered Aerosol D (under the trade names of AeroK® and Stat-X®) acceptable, subject to use conditions, as a halon 1301 substitute in total flooding 

fire protection uses in normally unoccupied spaces only. Your submission for use in normally 

occupied spaces and the additional information received on October 30, 2013, has been reviewed 

for completeness. We find the submission to be complete. 

Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: 

Substitute name: Stat-X/Aero-K Condensed Aerosol System 

Substance(s) the substitute will replace: Halon 1301 

Sector: Fire Suppression 

End-use: Total flooding applications in normally occupied areas 

Date received: May 23, 2013 

Most recent update received: October 30, 2013 

Status of submission: Complete 

Powdered Aerosol D (Aero-K®, Stat-X®) is currently listed as acceptable subject to use 

conditions for total flooding, with use restricted to normally unoccupied areas. The submission 

we have found complete by this action requests review of this substitute for use in normally 

occupied spaces. We intend to issue a future proposed rule for Stat-X/Aero-K Condensed 

Aerosol System. Before issuing a final decision, we will review any public comments or other 

information that has become available. Note that under the current listing, use of this substitute 

in total flooding applications in normally occupied areas is not allowed. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
If you have questions about how the rulemaking process for your fire suppressant, please contact 

Bella Maranion at (202) 564-9749 or Maranion.Bella@epa.gov. If you have questions about your 

submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9445 or vondemhagen.Rebecca@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

6eu~~ 

Rebecca von dem Hagen 

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch 

Stratospheric Protection Division
No. 10-7241.

#### Abdul Awkal, Petitioner v. Betty Mitchell, Warden.

562 U.S. 1183, 131 S. Ct. 1002,

178 L. Ed. 2d 834,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 756.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*835Same case below, 613 F.3d 629.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (the Registrant) that the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the
Registrant for such period.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ William L. Stephens              
|                        |  | William L. Stephens                  
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Lawrence Safarek                 
|                        |  | Lawrence Safarek                     
|                        |  | Vice President and Treasurer         
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16226]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 10, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before July 6, 
1998 to be assured of consideration.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the surveys described below at 
the beginning July 1998, the Department of the Treasury is requesting 
that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by June 23, 1998. To obtain a copy of this 
study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance Officer at 
the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: M:SP:V 98-011-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1998 Second Quarter Automated 941 TeleFile Customer Survey.
    Description: The 941 TeleFile automated customer satisfaction 
survey is part of the 1998 941 Quality Measurement plan and is designed 
as one means of evaluating the effectiveness of the 941 TeleFile 
system. This survey requests information about satisfaction and whether 
the business filer would be willing to use the TeleFile system again.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,385.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 minute.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 23 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-16226 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# K2TIPV51612771

# K2TIPV51612774

# K2TIPV51612775

# K2TIPV51612778

# K2TIPV51612783

# K2TIPV51682822

# K2TIPV51752882

# K2TIPV51752895

# K2TIPV51752896

# K2TIPV51962917

# K2TIPV51962928

# K2TIPV51962932

# K2TIPV52032945

# K2TIPV52032946

# K2TIPV52032949

# K2TIPV52032951

# K2TIPV52032952

# K2TIPV52032960

# K2TIPV52032961

# K2TIPV52032970

# K2TIPV52102006

# K2TIPV52102015

# K2TIPV52102016

# K2TIPV52102017

# K2TIPV52102023

# K2TIPV52102026

# K2TIPV52102047

# K2TIPV52102049

# K2TIPV52102051

# K2TIPV52102053

# K2TIPV52102055

# K2TIPV52102057

# K2TIPV52102065

# K2TIPV52102070

# K2TIPV52382081

# K2TIPV52382088

# K2TIPV52382091

# K2TIPV52382097

# K2TIPV52382119

# K2TIPV52382129

# K2TIPV52382130

# K2TIPV52382132

# K2TIPV52382135

# K2TIPV52382136

# K2TIPV52382137

# K2TIPV52872138

# K2TIPV52872140

# K2TIPV52872141

# K2TIPV52872145

# K2TIPV52872166
# C_2015354EN.01001001.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles — France) — Groupe Steria SCA v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics

(Case C-386/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tax legislation - Freedom of establishment - Directive 90/435/EEC - Article 4(2) - Cross-border distributions of dividends - Corporation tax - Group taxation (French intégration fiscale) - Tax exemption for dividends paid by subsidiaries belonging to the tax-integrated group - Residence qualification - Dividends paid by non-resident subsidiaries - Non-deductible costs and expenses relating to the holding))

(2015/C 354/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Groupe Steria SCA

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding rules of a Member State that govern a tax integration regime under which a tax-integrated parent company is entitled to neutralisation as regards the add-back of a proportion of costs and expenses, fixed at 5 % of the net amount of the dividends received by it from tax-integrated resident companies, when such neutralisation is refused to it under those rules as regards the dividends distributed to it from subsidiaries located in another Member State, which, had they been resident, would have been eligible in practice, if they so elected.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.

1

---
No. 10-339.

#### Kirk Benoit, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Agriculture, et al.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1043,

178 L. Ed. 2d 863,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 976.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 608 F.3d 17.
No. 10-7162.

#### Richard L. Davis, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

562 U.S. 1147, 131 S. Ct. 922,

178 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 113.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 26 So. 3d 802.
**DAAN-09-03**

**Clarification with Suppliers First Article Testing**

(September 2016)

DLA Aviation Contracting Officer grants permission for the Engineering Support Activity and/or the testing facility to conduct clarifications directly with suppliers. However, for any clarifications that result in necessary changes to contract language, technical specifications, etc., the supplier shall contact the Post Award Contracting Officer (see the “Issued By” block on the contract award or order) for written approval. The supplier shall not act on any revisions or other change until a modification implementing the proposed revision (s)/change (s) is agreed to and issued by the Contracting Officer.

(End of Notice)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            Symyx Technologies, Inc.

                   2005 CASH BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     The Symyx Technologies, Inc. 2005 Cash Bonus Plan for Executive Officers
provides for an annual cash bonus target of up to 75% of an executive's base
salary, with the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Symyx
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") retaining authority, in its discretion, to
increase the cash bonus to a total of up to 100% of an executive's base salary,
based upon the attainment by the Company of certain specified annual financial
and other performance targets as well as certain non-financial factors related
to the individual executive's performance. The annual financial and other
targets for the program are set by the Compensation Committee and are based on
the Company's overall financial performance, including revenue and operating
income targets and other non-financial objectives.

     Bonus payments will be made in one cash payment at or shortly after the end
of the year.
A Tip From A Former Smoker® 

Nathan M Memorial :30 URL 

ISCI Code: VCDC0483000/H

The spot opens on the A Tip From A Former Smoker® logo and cuts to a shot of Nathan sitting

The text “Nathan, 54, Oglala Sioux, Idaho” appears on the bottom left-hand side of the screen. 

NATHAN M: When you smoke it affects more than just your health. 

The spot cuts to a photo Nathan and his family. 

NATHAN M: I love to dance. That’s something that I handed down to my family. 

The spot cuts to Nathan sitting. 

NATHAN M: I was pretty good at it too. 

The spot cuts to Nathan at a ranch. 

NATHAN M: Before my doctor told me that secondhand smoke at work caused me to have 

asthma attacks, infections, and lung damage. And I never smoked. 

The spot cuts to Nathan sitting hooked to an oxygen tube. 

SUPER: Secondhand smoke killed Nathan. He was 54. 

You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.gov/tips

CDC Logo

Sponsored by the U.S. department of Health and Human Services.

#CDCTips

ANNCR: If you or someone you know wants free help to quit smoking, visit CDC.gov/tips
EQUALITY 

IN SMOKING

& DISEASE Nobody Wins! Nearly 

20 million 

women and girls

in the United States

smoke cigarettes.

60’S 70’S

DURING THE

and

TOBACCO COMPANIES 

TARGETED WOMEN.

( )

1964

2014

In the last 50 years 

a woman’s risk of 

dying from smoking has

MORE

THAN

and is now equal to a 

man’s risk.

TRIPLED

MORE 

LIKELY

W O M E N 

WHO SMOKE ARE

to die from COPD

than men who smoke.

WOMEN

OVER AGE 35

WHO SMOKE

have a slightly higher risk of 

dying from heart disease than 

men who smoke.

200,000

MORE THAN

WOMEN DIE EVERY YEAR

from smoking-related disease 

compared with 270,000 men 

who die from smoking-related 

disease every year.

WOMEN SMOKERS SHOULD QUIT SMOKING. 

For help, they can visit women.smokefree.gov or call 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

The Health Consequences of Smoking – 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2014.

Print Only
No. 10-7607.

#### Lester Hardy, Petitioner v. George J. Branker, Warden.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 952,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 133.

178 L. Ed. 2d 786,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 206.
No. 10-7663.

#### Derek N. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Montgomery County, Maryland.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1050,

178 L. Ed. 2d 870,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 971,

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 12.
No. 10-6180.

#### Marlon Bell, Petitioner v. Andrew Jackson, Warden.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 902,

178 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 560.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 440.
# C_2014045EN.01003901.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/39

---

Action brought on 29 November 2013 — Watch TV v Council

(Case T-639/13)

2014/C 45/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Watch TV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. de Visscher and M. von Kuegelgen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Council of the European Union of 30 September 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Council of the European Union of 30 September 2013;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union not to accept its tender submitted in respect of Lot No 1 in Contract UCA 190/11 for the provision of ‘audiovisual and multimedia services to the Council of the European Union/European Council’ (OJ 2012/S 26-041228).

In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 89(1) of the Financial Regulation (1) and of Articles 131(5), 135(2) and 146(3) of the Regulation implementing the Financial Regulation, (2) in view of the fact that the Council awarded the contract to a tenderer whose tender allegedly does not meet the obligatory minimum requirements relating to the suitability of candidates, as set out in the technical specifications. The applicant claims that the Council ought, therefore, to have automatically rejected the tender which it accepted.

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 357, p. 1).

2

---