alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014039EN.01000802.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Sundsvall (Sweden) lodged on 25 November 2013 — OKG AB v Skatteverket

(Case C-606/13)

2014/C 39/14

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Sundsvall

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: OKG AB

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteverket

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Article 4(2) of the Energy Taxation Directive (1) states that ‘level of taxation’ is the total charge levied in respect of all indirect taxes (except VAT) calculated directly or indirectly on the quantity of electricity at the time of release for consumption. Under Article 21(5) of that directive, electricity is to be subject to taxation and the tax liability is to become applicable at the time of supply by the distributor or redistributor. Do these articles preclude a tax levied on the thermal power of nuclear reactors? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4(2) of the Energy Taxation Directive (1) states that ‘level of taxation’ is the total charge levied in respect of all indirect taxes (except VAT) calculated directly or indirectly on the quantity of electricity at the time of release for consumption. Under Article 21(5) of that directive, electricity is to be subject to taxation and the tax liability is to become applicable at the time of supply by the distributor or redistributor. Do these articles preclude a tax levied on the thermal power of nuclear reactors?

1

| 2. | Does a tax on thermal power constitute an excise duty which is levied directly or indirectly on the consumption of such goods (excise goods) as are referred to in Article 1(1) of the Excise Duty Directive? (2) |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does a tax on thermal power constitute an excise duty which is levied directly or indirectly on the consumption of such goods (excise goods) as are referred to in Article 1(1) of the Excise Duty Directive? (2)

2

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC (OJ 2009 L 9, p. 12).

2

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 290 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating taxpayer financing 

of presidential election campaigns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating 

taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF TAXPAYER FINANCING OF 

4 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. 

5 (a) TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF INCOME TAX

6 PAYMENTS.—Section 6096 of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

8 new subsection: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 290 IH

1 ‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

2 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.’’. 

3 (b) TERMINATION OF FUND AND ACCOUNT.— 

4 (1) TERMINATION OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

5 CAMPAIGN FUND.— 

6 (A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of subtitle 

7 H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 9014. TERMINATION. 

10 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply with 

11 respect to any presidential election (or any presidential 

12 nominating convention) after the date of the enactment 

13 of this section, or to any candidate in such an election.’’. 

14 (B) TRANSFER OF REMAINING FUNDS.— 

15 Section 9006 of such Code is amended by add16 ing at the end the following new subsection: 

17 ‘‘(d) TRANSFER OF FUNDS REMAINING AFTER TER18 MINATION.—The Secretary shall transfer the amounts in 

19 the fund as of the date of the enactment of this subsection 

20 to the 10-Year Pediatric Research Initiative Fund de21 scribed in section 9008(i)(2), to be available as described 

22 in such section.’’. 

23 (2) TERMINATION OF ACCOUNT.—Chapter 96 

24 of subtitle H of such Code is amended by adding at 

25 the end the following new section: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 290 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 9043. TERMINATION. 

2 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any 

3 candidate with respect to any presidential election after 

4 the date of the enactment of this section.’’. 

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

6 (1) The table of sections for chapter 95 of sub7 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9014. Termination.’’. 

9 (2) The table of sections for chapter 96 of sub10 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9043. Termination.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN ROJAS-REFUJIO, AKA Martin

Refugio, AKA Martin Rojas,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-73034

Agency No. A095-804-643

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Martin Rojas-Refujio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous

FILED

NOV 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
physical presence determination. Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-

51 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Rojas-Refujio

failed to establish the requisite continuous physical presence, where Rojas-Refujio

testified that he remained outside the United States for a period of more than 180

days in the aggregate during the statutory period. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A),

(d)(2) (a departure in excess of 180 days in the aggregate breaks continuous

physical presence). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 14-73034
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 287 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 287

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Courtney, 
   Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Golden, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Himes, Mr. Keating, Mr. 
   Kennedy, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Larson of 
   Connecticut, Mr. Lynch, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Neal, Mr. 
    Pappas, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Pressley, Mrs. Trahan, and Mr. Welch) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New England Coastal Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF OFF THE COAST OF NEW ENGLAND.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary may not issue a lease for the 
exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in any 
area of the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of the State of 
Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or Connecticut.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015236EN.01001601.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Teekanne GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-195/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2000/13/EC - Labelling and presentation of foodstuffs - Articles 2(1)(a)(i) and 3(1)(2) - Labelling such as could mislead the purchaser as to the composition of foodstuffs - List of ingredients - Use of the indication ‘raspberry and vanilla adventure’ and of depictions of raspberries and vanilla flowers on the packaging of a fruit tea not containing those ingredients))

(2015/C 236/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Teekanne GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2(1)(a)(i) and 3(1)(2) of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009, must be interpreted as precluding the labelling of a foodstuff and methods used for the labelling from giving the impression, by means of the appearance, description or pictorial representation of a particular ingredient, that that ingredient is present, even though it is not in fact present and this is apparent solely from the list of ingredients on the foodstuff’s packaging.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy Harrington, the Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Chairman of
Able Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter year ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003


/s/ Timothy Harrington
----------------------
Name: Timothy Harrington
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chairman
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, William L. Stephens, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting

Date: August 14, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ William L. Stephens              
|William L. Stephens                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### *ABC Holdings Inc. et al., Petitioners, v. Kittitas County, Respondent,*

No. 91878-3.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 30770-1-III, 31712-9-III, and 32301-3-III, April 23, 2015, 187 Wn. App. 275. *Denied*November 4, 2015.
1 ... S ee Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 23 0- CV CI TY OF CEL I NA AN D CI TY OF PI L O T P O I NT APPE L L AN TS V . C I TY O F PI LO T PO I N T A N D A PPELL EES T A L L E Y R A N C H M A N A G E M E N T , L T D . AND CI TY OF CE L I NA AND TAL L E Y R A N C H M A N A G E M E N T , L T D .

----- -----

FR O M THE 3 62ND D I STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDUM OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- W e h ave co ns i de re d “ C r os s- A ppe l l ant ’ s M ot i on To Di sm i ss . ” I ti s t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on s houl d be gr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e di sm i sst he a p p e a l o f th e C i tyo f P i l o t P o i n t , a p p e l l a n t. S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 43. 2( f ) . Thi s ca se s hal l he r ea f t erbe s t yl ed “Ci t y ofCel i na v. C i t y of Pi l otPoi nt a n d T a l l e yR a n c h M a n a g e m e n t, L td .”2

C os t s oft he app ea l ofCi t y ofPi l otPoi nt , ap pel l ant , ve r su s C i t y ofCel i na a n d T a l l e y R a n c h M a n a g e m e n t, L td ., ap p e l l e e s, sh a l l b e tax e d ag a i n st th e p a rt y i ncur r i ng t he sam e, f orw hi ch l etexecut i on i ssue. P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: DA U PH I N O T, H O LM A N , an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Se pt e m be r25, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0372 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRYCE CALEB HAMERNICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 17, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 13 2022

01/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0372
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ECC International Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") of Forms S-8
(Registration Nos. 2-85483, 33-02768, 33-11904, 33-37224, 33-46671, 333-10725,
333-41861 and 333-53383) of our report dated October 12, 1998, which includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and for the fiscal years
ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
October 12, 1998
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

JOHN YERESSIAN, 

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3080

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF0752090049-C-2. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

John Yeressian moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

Case: 13-3080 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2013
JOHN YERESSIAN v. ARMY 2

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s24 

Case: 13-3080 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2013
No. 10-347.

#### Zvi Guttman, Petitioner v. Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Mayor of the City of Baltimore, Maryland, et al.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 601,

178 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8892.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

*436Same case below, 190 Md. App. 395, 988 A.2d 1095.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Filitaula, Petitioner,*

No. 91192-4.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 72434-7-1, December 8, 2014, 184 Wn. App. 819. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
July 24, 2014

CAAP-13-0000701

#### State v. Slavick

Affirmed
0 

TAKE ON 

TB still suffer from tuberculosis (TB).

Too many people in 

TB cases reported in 2022

8, 331 cases of TB were 

reported in the U.S. in 2022

The TB case rate is: 

people 

The national average is 

2.5 per 100,000 people 

per 100,0 0

Symptoms of TB disease include: 

C Weakness

Chills

Fever

A typical person with TB disease 

in the United States requires:

PLUS

•

•

•

TEST 

TB 

TEST 

To eliminate TB, we must prioritize 

groups at increased risk for TB:

A TBAAPPROA 

[LOGO]

Testing & treatment of Engaging affected communities

populations at risk for TB and medical providers

To learn more about TB, visit: 

4 or 6

months of 

medications
No. 08-9917.

#### Roy Willard Blankenship, Petitioner v. Hilton Hall, Warden.

562 U.S. 1199, 131 S. Ct. 1041,

178 L. Ed. 2d 863,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1014.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 542 F.3d 1253.
Unassociated Document



Exhibit 10.1


 




T.R. Winston & Company,


1999 Avenue of the Stars #2550


Los Angeles, CA 90067







May 19, 2014







Lilis Energy, Inc.


1900 Grant Street, Suite #720


Denver, CO   80203







Re:        Extension of Maturity of 8% Senior Secured Debentures







The undersigned agree, severally and not jointly, to extend the maturity date of all of the 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures (the “Debentures”) of Lilis Energy, Inc. (“Lilis”) held by the undersigned, from May 16, 2014 until August 15, 2014, contingent upon the extension by Hexagon, LLC of the maturity date of all of Lilis’s debt outstanding as of the date hereof under the three loan agreements between Lilis and Hexagon (the “Term Loans”) through the same date. The undersigned also waive any right the undersigned may have to declare an event of default in connection with the May 16, 2014 maturity date under the Debentures, again contingent upon Hexagon’s extension of the Term Loans.








	  	
Very truly yours,


	 	 
	  	
EZ Colony Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ Bryan Ezralow


	  	
Name: 

	
Bryan Ezralow as Trustee of the Bryan


	  	  	
Ezralow 1994 Trust


	  	
Title:

	
Managing General Partner













	  	
Jonathan & Nancy Glaser Family Trust


DTD 12/16/1998 Jonathan M. Glaser and Nancy E. Glaser TTEES


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ Jonathan Glaser


	  	
Name: 

	
Jonathan Glaser


	  	
Title: 

	
Trustee













	  	
Wallington Investment Holdings, Ltd.


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ Michael Khoury


	  	
Name: 

	
Michael Khoury


	  	
Title: 

	
Director







 




	 	

Steven B. Dunn and Laura Dunn Revocable Trust


DTD 10/28/10, Steven B. Dunn & Laura Dunn TTEES


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ Steven B. Dunn


	  	
Name: 

	
Steven B. Dunn


	  	
Title: 

	
Trustee







 



	  	
G. Tyler Runnels and Jasmine N. Runnels TTEES The Runnels Family Trust DTD 1-11-2000


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ G. Tyler Runnels


	  	
Name: 

	
G. Tyler Runnels


	  	
Title:

	
Trustee


	  	  
	  	
EMSE, LLC,


a Delaware limited liability company


	 	 
	  	  	
/s/ Marc Ezralow


	  	
Name: 

	
Marc Ezralow


	  	
Title:

	
Manager
















  





2











  






 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED


 


this 19th day of May, 2014








	  	
LILIS ENERGY, INC.


	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	 
	  	  	
Abraham Mirman


	  	
Its:

	
Chief Executive Officer







 


3