alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza,
the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the "Company") and John L.
Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that,
to the best of their knowledge:

1)   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30,
     2006, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the
     "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 18th
day of April 2007.

                                         /s/Leonard F. Leganza
                                         ---------------------
                                         Leonard F. Leganza
                                         CEO


                                         /s/John L. Sullivan III
                                         -----------------------
                                         John L. Sullivan III
                                         CFO


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.)




                                      -68-
No. 10-7456.

No. 10-7478.

#### George Wilson, Petitioner v. United States. Joseph Blackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 841,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9757.

178 L. Ed. 2d 571,

December 13, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 390 U.S. App. D.C. 368, 605 F.3d 985.
# C_2016038EN.01000601.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei járásbíróság — Hungary) — Banif Plus Bank Zrt. v Márton Lantos, Mártonné Lantos

(Case C-312/14) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2004/39/EC - Articles 4(1) and 19(4), (5) and (9) - Markets in financial instruments - Concept of ‘investment services and activities’ - Provisions to ensure investor protection - Conduct of business obligations when providing investment services to clients - Obligation to assess the suitability or appropriateness of the service to be provided - Contractual consequences of non-compliance with that obligation - Consumer credit contracts - Foreign currency denominated loan - Advancement and reimbursement of loan in domestic currency - Terms relating to the exchange rate))

(2016/C 038/07)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Ráckevei járásbíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Banif Plus Bank Zrt.

Applicant:

Defendant: Márton Lantos, Mártonné Lantos

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1)(2) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to verification by the referring court, an investment service or activity within the meaning of that provision does not encompass certain foreign exchange transactions, effected by a credit institution under clauses of a foreign currency denominated loan agreement such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, consisting in fixing the amount of the loan on the basis of the purchase price of the currency applicable when the funds are advanced and in determining the amounts of the monthly instalments on the basis of the sale price of that currency applicable when each monthly instalment is calculated.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
# C_2013274EN.01001303.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Anotato Dikastirio Kiprou (Cyprus) lodged on 16 July 2013 — Cypra Limited v Republic of Cyprus

(Case C-402/13)

2013/C 274/23

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Anotato Dikastirio Kiprou

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cypra Limited

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Cyprus, represented by the Minister for Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment and the Director of Veterinary Services

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 (1) confer upon the competent authority a discretion to determine the time at which a particular slaughter of animals takes place, in view of its obligation to appoint an official veterinarian for the purposes of carrying out supervision in relation to the slaughter of animals, or is it obliged to appoint such a veterinarian at the time that the slaughter will take place, as determined by the slaughterer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 (1) confer upon the competent authority a discretion to determine the time at which a particular slaughter of animals takes place, in view of its obligation to appoint an official veterinarian for the purposes of carrying out supervision in relation to the slaughter of animals, or is it obliged to appoint such a veterinarian at the time that the slaughter will take place, as determined by the slaughterer?

1

| 2. | Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 confer upon the competent authority a discretion to refuse to appoint an official veterinarian for the carrying out of veterinary supervision of the lawful slaughter of animals when it is informed that the slaughter of animals will take place at a particular time, at a licensed slaughterhouse? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 confer upon the competent authority a discretion to refuse to appoint an official veterinarian for the carrying out of veterinary supervision of the lawful slaughter of animals when it is informed that the slaughter of animals will take place at a particular time, at a licensed slaughterhouse?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 206).

1

---
No. 10-6550.

#### Herman Scott, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1182, 131 S. Ct. 999,

178 L. Ed. 2d 833,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 860.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 441.
Exhibit 12.1

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(In thousands)



Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges





|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                                      |  | 2007 |         | 2006 |   | 2005   |  | 2004 |        | 2003
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |  
|Income from continuing operations before income taxes |  | $    | 114,956 |      | $ | 73,196 |  | $    | 67,670 |      | $ | 38,989 |  | $ | 40,605
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |  
|Fixed charges 1                                       |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Interest expense                                      |  |      | 35,302  |      |   | 21,290 |  |      | 18,159 |      |   | 17,336 |  |   | 11,991
|Amortization of debt issuance cost                    |  |      |        |      |   | 172    |  |      | 56     |      |   | 56     |  |   | 703   
|Interest included in rental expense                   |  |      | 4,602   |      |   | 3,505  |  |      | 3,137  |      |   | 2,894  |  |   | 2,398 
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |  
|Total                                                 |  |      | 39,904  |      |   | 24,967 |  |      | 21,352 |      |   | 20,286 |  |   | 15,092
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |  
|Earnings 2                                            |  | $    | 154,860 |      | $ | 98,163 |  | $    | 89,022 |      | $ | 59,275 |  | $ | 55,697
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |  
|Ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges    |  |      | 3.9     |      |   | 3.9    |  |      | 4.2    |      |   | 2.9    |  |   | 3.7   





|1 | Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt issuance cost plus that portion of lease rental expense
representative of the interest factor.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 84

CRAIG W. STEWART * September Term, 2020

CORRECTED ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of 

Maryland and the Respondent, Craig W. Stewart, to indefinitely suspend the Respondent 

from the practice of law for violations of 19-301.15(a), 19-308.4(d) and 19-410(c) of the 

Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 7th day of April, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Craig W. 

Stewart, be, and hereby is, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of 

Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Craig W. Stewart

from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client 

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in 

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

 /s/ Robert N. McDonald

 Senior Judge
The correction notice(s) for this opinion(s) can be found here: 

https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/appellate/correctionnotices/coa/84a20agcn.pdf
#### *In re Parental Rights to K.J.B.,*

No. 91921-6.

Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32490-7-III, June 11, 2015, 188 Wn. App. 263. *Granted*February 10, 2016.
No. 10M47.

#### Christopher E. Washington, Petitioner v. Equifax Information Services LLC.

562 U.S. 1058, 131 S. Ct. 683,

178 L. Ed. 2d 473,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9275.

November 29, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 633.
# C_2015371EN.01000801.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht — Germany) — Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa Alimanovic and Others

(Case C-67/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for persons - Citizenship of the Union - Equal treatment - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 24(2) - Social assistance - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Articles 4 and 70 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Member State nationals who are job-seekers and resident in a different Member State - Excluded - Retention of the status of ‘worker’))

(2015/C 371/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundessozialgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln

Applicant:

Defendants: Nazifa Alimanovic, Sonita Alimanovic, Valentina Alimanovic, Valentino Alimanovic

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1244/2010 of 9 December 2010, must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State under which nationals of other Member States who are in a situation such as that referred to in Article 14(4)(b) of that directive are excluded from entitlement to certain ‘special non-contributory cash benefits’ within the meaning of Article 70(2) of Regulation No 883/2004, which also constitute ‘social assistance’ within the meaning of Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38, although those benefits are granted to nationals of the Member State concerned who are in the same situation.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  T ASH H EPTING , on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; G REGORY H ICKS ; E RIK K NUTZEN , on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; C AROLYN J EWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; B ENSON B. R OE , Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, No. 06-17132

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. and 

#  CV-06-00672-VRW W IRED N EWS ; C ONDENET I NC .,

Intervenors,

v. AT&T C ORPORATION ,

Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, I NC ., Defendant, U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Defendant-Intervenor. 

# 

11353

#  T ASH H EPTING , on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; G REGORY H ICKS , E RIK K NUTZEN , on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; C AROLYN J EWEL , on Behalf of No. 06-17137 Herself and All Others Similarly D.C. No. Situated; B ENSON B. R OE , Plaintiff CV-06-00672-VRW in related case no. C-06-03467 Northern District of



#  MMC, California,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, San Francisco v. ORDER AT&T C ORPORATION ; AT&T, I NC .,

Defendants, and U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA , Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. 

# 

Filed August 21, 2008
Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER
In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals. 11354 H EPTING v. AT&T C ORPORATIONPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
No. 10-7621.

#### Dontavius Wise, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 954,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 547.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 566.
##### 



ARTICLE I
STOCKHOLDERS




---



##### 



- 2 -




---



##### 

\

ARTICLE II
BOARD
   - 3 -




---



##### 



- 4 -




---



##### 



- 5 -




---



##### 



- 6 -




---



##### 



- 7 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
OFFICERS
   - 8 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
CERTIFICATES OF STOCK
   - 9 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
CORPORATE BOOKS
  - 10 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
CHECKS, NOTES, PROXIES, ETC.
  ARTICLE VII
FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
CORPORATE SEAL
  ARTICLE IX
OFFICES
  ARTICLE X
AMENDMENTS
  - 11 -
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE : ANITA DEJAYNES,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.D., N.M.D., AND E.M.D., MINOR CHILDREN,

R elator. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 075

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

I N MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator

, Anita DeJaynes, Individually and as Next Friend of A.D., N.M.D., and E.M.D.,

Minor Children

, filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable Mike Swanson , Judge

of the 143rd District Court of Ward County, Texas

, requesting that we order Respondent to rule

on Relator’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees and to enter final judgment. Relator

subsequently filed a joint motion to dismiss the original proceeding as moot becaus e Respondent

entered an order on May 22, 2018 resolving the motion for attorney’s fees and entered final

judgment. The original proceeding is moot. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion and dismiss

the original proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. See In re County of El Paso, 104 S.W.3d 741, 743

(Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2003, orig. proceeding)

.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice June 13, 2018

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.
1350):

      I, Harold R. Beattie, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of ElkCorp, certify to
my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.ss. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003,
            which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
            period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
            ElkCorp.

Dated: September 26, 2003
                                          By /s/ Harold R. Beattie, Jr.
                                             ---------------------------
                                                 Harold R. Beattie, Jr.
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# Sexual assault prevention and response resources soon to be available via mobile application

/ Published April 15, 2016

April is Sexual Assault and Prevention Month. “Eliminate Sexual Assault: Know Your Part, Do Your Part” is this year’s theme.

To help provide on-the-spot employee resources, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation will soon field a new mobile application called “We Care Aviation.”  The free app will be available for download in the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store.  No sign-in or registration is required. 

Meanwhile, employees may preview the application via their browser at We Care Aviation. 

“Sexual assault is a criminal act that will not be tolerated,” said Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day, DLA Aviation commander.  “I’m excited to field this mobile app that puts information at the fingertips of our military, civilian and contracted employees, though I pray they will never need it.”   

The app provides information to those who may be a victim or a witness of sexual assault or harassment. It also provides the Department of Defense definition of sexual assault and the different categories, which are rape, sexual assault, abusive or aggravated sexual contact, and forcible sodomy. 

“The success of our Sexual Assault and Prevention Program depends on each and every one of us, from senior leaders to the newest employees, upholding our values of integrity and accountability and doing our part to maintain a safe and secure workplace environment for all,” said Day. 

In additional to providing 24-hour crisis hotlines through local (Fort Lee, Virginia 1-804-894-0029) and national entities (DoD Safe Help Line 1-877-995-5247), the app guides victims and witnesses through steps to take if assaulted, stages of recovery, and reporting avenues.

The app also provides users with suicide prevention information to include risks, warning signs, and frequently-asked-questions. 

Employees are encouraged to provide feedback on the ease of use and helpfulness of the “We Care Aviation” app to Navy Lt. John Harmony, Navy acquisition and contracting intern, DLA Aviation Supplier Operations Directorate, via email at john.harmony@dla.mil.