alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.24




Escalade,
Incorporated


Schedule
of Executive Officer Compensation




Compensation
for the executive officers of Escalade, Incorporated consists of a base salary,
bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or
restricted stock unit grants.




Base
Salary


In
general, base salaries are set at the beginning of each year based upon the
Company’s income level generated in the prior year, any changes in the level of
responsibility and the subjective individual performance review conducted by the
Company’s Compensation Committee. The 2010 base salaries for the Companies
executive officers are as follows:




Name
            
            Position
            
            Annual
      Base SalaryRobert
      Griffin (a)
            
            Chairman
      of the Board
            
            $
            50,580Robert
      J. Keller (a)
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
            
            $
            270,000Deborah
      J. Meinert
            
            VP
      Finance, CFO
            
            $
            132,000




(a)
Messrs Griffin and Keller are entitled to receive $56,200 and $300,000
respectively but have voluntarily agreed to a 10% reduction in each of these
amounts.




Bonuses


Each year
the Company’s Compensation Committee establishes targeted bonuses for its key
executives based on target performance levels for the Company. Performance
targets are based on achieving pre-tax income goals in relation to invested
capital which is defined as beginning shareholder equity plus average bank debt
outstanding. Based on actual results achieved, a bonus pool is accrued for use
in paying bonuses. There are no pre-defined methods for allocating the bonus
pool to any of the key executives; allocation and payment is entirely at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. Due to economic
pressures on earnings, the Company paid no bonuses in 2009.




Long-Term
Incentives


Under the
terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, executive officers of
the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive compensation in various
forms including stock options and restricted stock units. The Company’s
Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form, amount and timing of
these grants which historically have been annual grants. In its determination of
annul grants, the Compensation Committee considers performance of both the
individual and the Company.




Additional
Benefits


Executive
officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and
receive Company matching contributions in accordance with the plan terms. The
Company also pays group term life insurance benefits on behalf of executive
officers. The Company’s Chairman of the Board participates in a salary deferral
plan that earns interest on undistributed amounts at the rate of 9% per
annum.
No. 10-7626.

#### Marquise Laguan Bowie, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 954,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 244.

178 L. Ed. 2d 787,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 618 F.3d 802.
No. 10-373.

#### Kim Iann Manning, Petitioner v. American Republic Insurance Company.

562 U.S. 1062, 131 S. Ct. 648,

178 L. Ed. 2d 480,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9424.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 1030.
Circuit Court for Charles County

Case No. C-08-CV-21-000250

Argued: September 6, 2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

No. 6

September Term, 2024

GREENMARK PROPERTIES, LLC

v.

PARTS, INC., ET AL.

Fader, C.J.,

Watts

Booth

Biran

Gould

Eaves

Killough

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: September 10, 2024
ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument, it is this 10th day of 

September 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs as improvidently 

granted and No. 6, September Term, 2024 is closed in this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that costs are to be paid by Petitioner.

 /s/ Matthew J. Fader 

 Chief Justice

GREENMARK PROPERTIES, LLC

v.

PARTS, INC., ET AL.

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 Pet. No. 303, September Term, 2024 

 No. 6, September Term, 2024
# C_2015398EN.01002202.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Aachen — Germany) — Horst Hoeck v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-196/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 398/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.

1

---
No. 10-6724.

#### John F. Mandarelli, Petitioner v. Patricia Barnhart, Warden.

562 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 578,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8741.

178 L. Ed. 2d 422,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-254-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 24, 1998, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective August 1, 1998.

First Revised Sheet No. 82-A
First Revised Sheet No. 101-A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 128
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 129
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 131

    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to submit 
tariff sheets which implement Version 1.2 of the GISB standards 
pursuant to Order No. 587-G and as required by Section 284.10(b) of the 
Commission's regulations.
    Kern River states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
its customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17900 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
TERRANCE L. JACKSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 2685

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

.

Terrance L. Jackson, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 10-7646.

#### Joe Lawrence Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1049,

178 L. Ed. 2d 870,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 970.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5273.

#### Sean A. Clark, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

562 U.S. 1103, 131 S. Ct. 815,

178 L. Ed. 2d 548,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9525.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*549Former decision, 562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 269, 178 L. Ed. 2d 177, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6829.
Exhibit
      32.1


Form
      10-QSB


Viking
      Systems, Inc.


File
      No.
      000-49636





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Marsh,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2005











/s/
      Thomas B. Marsh


Chief
      Executive Officer, President
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with this annual report of Espey Mfg. &  Electronics  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  June 30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, David
A. O'Neil, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: September 27, 2005


                                       /s/David A. O'Neil
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David A. O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer




33
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.85 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation FRCSE Logistics DLA DSC Richmond
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.85 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation FRCSE Logistics DLA DSC Richmond
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.85 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation FRCSE Logistics DLA DSC Richmond
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.85 MB)
 
 DLA Aviation FRCSE Logistics DLA DSC Richmond
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
                         AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           YEARS ENDED
                      MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998
          SUBSIDIARIES OF EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
   The following constitute all of the Registrant's subsidiary corporations:
   1. EMCEE Cellular Inc., a Delaware corporation;
   2. EMCEE Export Sales Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (this corporation
 is a wholly owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);
   3.R.F. Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (this corporation is a wholly
 owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);
   4.R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (this corporation is a
 wholly owned subsidiary of EMCEE Cellular Inc.);
   5.Universal Rapid Access, LLC (this limited liability company is a
 partially owned subsidiary of R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., which
 owns 10% of the outstanding equity of the limited liability
company);
   6. EMCEE Broadcast Products (Chengdu) Company, Ltd. (the Registrant
 owns 25% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of this corporation); and
   7. Grand Forks Wireless, L.L.C. (this limited liability company is a
partially owned subsidiary of R.F. Internet Systems, Inc., which owns
50% of the outstanding equity of the limited liability company).
1.All subsidiaries are wholly owned by the Registrant unless otherwise
indicated.
# DLA Land and Maritime gives Ohio families in need a helping hand

/ Published Jan. 25, 2023
GROVE CITY, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins and members of her military workforce spent the morning of Jan. 18 handing out food to hundreds of needy families at the Mid-Ohio Food Collective in Grove City, Ohio.

About 20 military officers and enlisted personnel representing all branches of service from across the organization spent several hours at the facility packing carts full of food and loading them into waiting cars during a morning food distribution.

Atkins said the morning’s activity ties directly back to the DLA Land and Maritime mission. “Remember what we do – we serve, right? And that means our communities too,” she said.

The Mid-Ohio Food Collective has 680 agency partners serving 20 counties in eastern and central Ohio. In addition to its regional mission, the Grove City facility also runs an onsite food pantry directly serving families in the Franklin County community encompassing the greater Columbus metropolitan area.

The morning began with an introductory briefing by Mid-Ohio’s Daytime Lead Mandy Conner. Conner took the group through each aspect of the operation and then divided volunteers into smaller teams to run different stations.

Navy Lt. Cdr. Thuy Nguyen and Navy Cdr. Jatan Bastola, both of Maritime Supplier Operations, partnered together to load grocery carts with fresh fruit and produce.

“I used to do this kind of thing when I first worked in shore duty but lately time hasn’t allowed me to,” Nguyen said. “I’m glad we’re able to do this as a team.”

Similar sentiments were expressed by many of the participants.

The volunteer event was spearheaded by Air Force Tech Sgt. Kevin Brown, a member of DLA Land and Maritime’s Joint Reserve Force Committee. This was the committee’s first official volunteer event at the food collective but Brown said he expects it won’t be the last. “It’s a fulfilling feeling to give back; it’s fast-paced but very rewarding,” he said.

At the event’s conclusion, Mid-Ohio Food Collective officials tallied up the results and reported nearly 500 families were assisted during the morning rush. Officials added that without the assistance of a dedicated volunteer base the work would not be possible.

Atkins thanked all participants for their time. “It’s a reminder to make sure you’re staying engaged every day – make sure you’re learning from the people around you,” she said.
#### *State, Respondent, v. Pittman, Petitioner,*

No. 91355-2.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 44652-9-II, January 27, 2015, 185 Wn. App. 614. *Denied*December 2, 2015.
No. 09-11362.

#### Harry Berroa, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 637,

178 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9135.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 266.
**Exhibit 21**Subsidiaries of the Registrant     The Registrant directly or indirectly owns 100 percent of the outstanding voting securities ofthe following subsidiary companies.   **Name of Company** **Jurisdiction**Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc. KansasCalibrated Forms Co., Inc. KansasConnolly Tool and Machine Company DelawareAdmore, Inc. TexasPFC Products, Inc.(1) DelawareEnnis Acquisitions, Inc. NevadaTexas EBF, LP TexasEnnis Sales, LP TexasEnnis Management, LP TexasAdams McClure, LP TexasAmerican Forms I, LP TexasNorthstar Computer Forms, Inc. MinnesotaGeneral Financial Supply, Inc. (2) IowaCrabar/GBF, Inc. DelawareRoyal Business Forms, Inc. TexasAlstyle Apparel, LLC TexasA and G, Inc. (3) IllinoisAlstyle Ensenada LLC (3) IllinoisAlstyle Hermosillo LLC (3) IllinoisDiaco USA LLC (3) IllinoisCactex S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoCactex de Mexico SA de C.V. (3) MexicoAlstyle International de Mexico SA de C.V. (3) MexicoAlvest, S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoDiaco International S.A. de C.V. (3) MexicoTennessee Business Forms, Inc. TennesseeTBF Realty, LLC (4) DelawareSpecialized Printed Forms, Inc. New YorkBlock Graphics, Inc. Oregon (1) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Admore, Inc. (2) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Northstar Computer Forms, Inc. (3) A wholly-owned direct or indirect subsidiary of Alstyle Apparel, LLC (4) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Tennessee Business Forms, Inc.
Exhibit
32.2
 Form
10-QSB
 Viking
Systems, Inc.
 File No.
000-49636
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Warrino,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  May 5,
2005
 
 
 
 /s/
Joseph Warrino
 Chief
Financial Officer
No. 10-756.

#### Flavio Perez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1180, 131 S. Ct. 1022,

178 L. Ed. 2d 830,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 763.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 879.
VI

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2413

For the relief of Richard M. Sakakida.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 23 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

For the relief of Richard M. Sakakida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD OF MEDAL FOR

4 HEROISM.

5 (a) REVIEW OF RECORDS.—(1) The Secretary of the

6 Army shall review the military records of Richard M.

7 Sakakida of Fremont, California. The purpose of the re8 view is to determine whether the award to Richard M.

9 Sakakida of a medal or cross authorized under section

10 3741, 3742, or 3746 of title 10, United States Code, for

11 any action of Richard M. Sakakida in the Philippines dur12 ing World War II is appropriate.
2

•S 2413 IS

1 (2) The determination under paragraph (2) whether

2 the award of a medal or cross is appropriate shall be gov3 erned by the standards that apply to the medal or cross

4 concerned under the provision of law authorizing the

5 medal or cross.

6 (b) AWARD.—Notwithstanding section 3744(b) of

7 title 10, United States Code, the Secretary may award to

8 Richard M. Sakakida of Fremont, California, a medal or

9 cross referred to in subsection (a) if the Secretary deter10 mines in accordance with the review required under that

11 subsection that the award of the medal or cross, as the

12 case may be, is appropriate.

Æ
# C_2014071EN.01000801.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 December 2013 — Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden

(Case C-657/13)

(2014/C 71/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Finanzamt Hilden

Question referred

Is it consistent with the freedom of establishment under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union if, upon the transfer of an asset from a domestic to a foreign permanent establishment of the same undertaking, a national rule stipulates that there is a withdrawal for non-business purposes, with the result that the disclosure of hidden reserves leads to a profit upon the withdrawal, and another national rule provides the possibility of distributing that profit equally over five or ten financial years?

---