alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF DYNATECH CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           State or Other
     Name of Parent or Subsidiary Organization*             Jurisdiction
     ------------------------------------------       -------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Dynatech Corporation (Parent)........................ Delaware
Dynatech LLC......................................... Delaware
Airshow, Incorporated................................ Delaware
DataViews Corporation................................ Massachusetts
daVinci Systems, Inc................................. Florida
ICS Advent........................................... California
Itronix Corporation.................................. Washington
Pacific Systems Corporation.......................... Washington
Parallax Graphics, Inc............................... Delaware
Synergistic Solutions, Inc........................... Georgia
Tele-Path Instruments, Inc........................... Delaware
TTC International Holdings, Inc...................... Delaware
Dynatech Export Incorporated......................... Barbados, West Indies
TTC Belgium B.V.B.A.................................. Belgium
TTC Canada Ltd....................................... Canada
Dynatech Corporation Ltd............................. England
ICS Advent Europe.................................... France
TTC Telecommunications France SARL................... France
Dynatech Gesellschaft Fur Datenveravbeitung, GmbH.... Germany
TTC Federal Systems, Inc............................. Delaware
Dynatech Holdings Ltd................................ Guernsey, Channel Islands
Dynatech Investments, Ltd............................ Guernsey, Channel Islands
TTC Asia Pacific Limited............................. Hong Kong
WWG LLC.............................................. Delaware
Dynatech World Holdings GmbH......................... Germany
Dynatech Subworld Holdings GmbH...................... Germany
WWG GmbH............................................. Germany
Wavetek GmbH......................................... Germany
Wavetek SA........................................... France
W+G ATE Systems, Inc. ............................... North Carolina
W+G Technologies, Inc................................ Delaware
Wavetek US........................................... Delaware
Applied Digital Access, Inc.......................... Delaware
Sierra Design Labs................................... Nevada
Airshow France SARL.................................. France
Itronix GmbH......................................... Germany
Itronix Limited...................................... UK
</TABLE>
--------
*  Excludes nonmaterial subsidiaries.
No. 10-25.

#### Mary H. Macon, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 227,

178 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6759,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County, denied.
No. 10-7656.

#### Stephen Burton Lockhart, Petitioner v. Patricia Barnhart, Warden.

562 U.S. 1203, 131 S. Ct. 1050,

178 L. Ed. 2d 870,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 1026.

January 24, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
#### Jalor Color Graphics, Inc., Respondent, v Universal Advertising Systems, Inc., Defendant. Fred Rosenberg, Nonparty Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 615]

*166Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about September 30, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, affirmed the orders of Civil Court, New York County (Rolando Acosta, J.), entered on or about December 27, 1999 and January 21, 2000, which granted plaintiffs motion for sanctions and sua sponte awarded costs, and directed nonparty appellant attorney for defendant to pay $7,500 to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection and $2,100 to plaintiff’s counsel, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellant failed to produce any evidence at trial to support his claim of an agreement whereby defendant, his client, would receive for free the 1,200 brochures (worth more than $11,000) printed by plaintiff. Long after expiration of the 30-day period for objecting to the invoice, appellant charged that *plaintiff’s*effort to collect the contracted fee was based on fraud and extortion. In a letter to plaintiffs counsel in 1998, this “former Assistant District Attorney for the State of New York” threatened criminal prosecution if plaintiff pursued such an “illegal” claim. A year later, after plaintiff had commenced this action for recovery on its account stated, appellant again wrote to plaintiffs counsel, stating that he was “continuing to investigate the extremely serious issues regarding the commission of felony and other related offenses by [plaintiffs principal] *and yourself*[emphasis added], . . . involving] *perjury*[emphasis in original] . . . Contempt . . . and other related crimes.” Even after plaintiffs counsel sought sanctions from the court for such in terrorem tactics, appellant moved to hold plaintiff, its principal and counsel in contempt for perjury. Such baseless threats constituted frivolous conduct undertaken primarily to harass and intimidate an adversary, and to frustrate resolution of this commercial litigation *(see*22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]). We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ. *[See*193 Misc 2d 76.]
**DAAN-48-04**

**Partial Production Using Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP)**

(January 2017)

Some units supplied under this contract/order shall be produced using the VECP Numbers identified below. The remaining units shall be produced using the specification/drawing identified in the procurement item description without using any approved VECP method.  

If any of these items are produced as other than specified, acceptance is prohibited.  

Method: ___________________ 

Number of Units: ___________________

Specification/Drawings without VECP: ___________________

VECP Number(s): ___________________

(End of Notice)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2581-000]


HDI Associates III; Notice of Withdrawal

June 25, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 22, 1998, HDI Associates III tendered for 
filing Notice of Withdrawal of its filing made on April 17, 1998, in 
Docket No. ER98-2581-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 216 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.216). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 7, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17495 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1880

AN ACT

To provide that the National Education CommisSeptember 30, 1994. sion on Time and Learning shall terminate on
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1880

AN ACT

To provide that the National Education Commission on Time

and Learning shall terminate on September 30, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE NATIONAL EDUCATION

4 COMMISSION ON TIME AND LEARNING.

5 Subsection (g) of section 102 of the National Edu6 cation Commission on Time and Learning Act (20 U.S.C.

7 1221–1 note) is amended by striking ‘‘90 days after sub8 mitting the final report required by subsection (d)’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘on September 30, 1994’’.

Passed the Senate July 15 (legislative day, July 11),

1994.

Attest:

Secretary.
No. 10-7659.

#### Marsha L. Payton, Petitioner v. Department of Homeland Security.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 956,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 278.

178 L. Ed. 2d 789,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 496.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2771 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2771

    To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise 
regulations with respect to payment rates for durable medical equipment 
          under the Medicare program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2019

 Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself and Mr. Loebsack) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise 
regulations with respect to payment rates for durable medical equipment 
          under the Medicare program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Home Oxygen and Medical 
Equipment Act of 2019'' or the ``Protecting HOME Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REVISING PAYMENT RATES FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) Rural and Noncontiguous Areas.--Not later than December 31, 
2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall revise section 
414.210(g)(9)(iii) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any 
successor regulation), to apply the transition rule described in such 
section to all applicable items and services furnished in rural areas 
and noncontiguous areas (as such terms are defined for purposes of such 
section) on or after June 1, 2018.
    (b) Areas Other Than Rural and Noncontiguous Areas.--With respect 
to items and services furnished on or after the date that is 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services shall apply section 414.210(g)(9)(iv) of title 42, 
Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), as if the 
reference to ``100 percent of the adjusted payment amount established 
under this section'' were instead a reference to ``75 percent of the 
adjusted payment amount established under this section and 25 percent 
of the unadjusted fee schedule amount''.

SEC. 3. BUDGET NEUTRALITY FOR OXYGEN UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1834(a)(9)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(a)(9)(D)(ii)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The requirement of the preceding sentence shall not apply 
beginning on January 1, 2020.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PCS Research
Technology, Inc. (the " Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.







Date: August 14, 2003                  By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                           -------------------------------
                                       Name:  Brian M. Overstreet
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Principal Accounting Officer


                                       31
LOCAL AGREEMENT - ARTICLE 6
USE OF OFFICIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
BETWEEN
DLA DISPOSITION SERVICES
FIELD SITES (NOT CO-LOCATED WITH OTHER DLA ACTIVITIES)
AND
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFGE), LOCAL 1626

Section 1: General

A. MLA Article 6 Use of Official Facilities and Services allows for local negotiation of
facilities and services for Union and employee use. Accordingly, the parties agree to the use
of facilities and services as set forth below.

Section 2: Use by Union

A. The Employer will provide the Union with office space for the exclusive use of the Union at
field sites where there is a representative. The office space will be easily accessible and
private.

B. Ifthe Employer determines that the Union’s office needs to be moved, the Employer will
provide the Union with a new office space equivalent to the space being vacated. The
Employer will provide the Union with adequate notification to make moving arrangements
prior to relocation, whether the relocation is temporary or permanent in nature.

C. IAW with MLA Article 6, the Employer will provide the Union with access to DSN and
commercial phone service, lockable file cabinet(s), computer(s) with Internet access, and
furniture. The Employer will also make available fax machines and lines, scanners,
telephones, copiers, and supporting supplies.

D. The Employer will provide the Union with adequate space on, and access to, all official
bulletin boards.

Section 3: Use by Employees

A. Space Allocation: When allocating new workspaces, the Employer will take employee
requested desired workstation/location into consideration when practical.

* Documented medical needs or Reasonable Accommodation (RA) will take priority
over other considerations.

¢ Highest grade will then be used as the next deciding factor.

¢ Highest Service Computation Date (SCD) (Annual Leave) will be used as the “tie
breaker” if more than one employee of the same grade desires the same workspace.


¢ Placement of bargaining unit employees will have priority over contract employees.

Section 4: Parking

A. The Employer will provide one (1) designated Union parking space at Disposition field sites
where executive board members are assigned. Disposition field site parking spaces may
change based on where an executive board member is assigned.

B. Open (non-designated) parking spaces are available on a first come/first available basis.

For the Union: For Agency:
phLM Lrrnper VLE EE
Robin L. Nichols, President Andre Toussaint, COL. USA

American Federation of Government Employees DLA, Disposition Services-Battle Creek MI
AFGE Local 1626 HDI Federal Center
# C_2016305EN.01000501.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Barcelona — Spain) — Estrella Rodríguez Sánchez v Consum Sociedad Cooperativa Valenciana

(Case C-351/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2010/18/EU - Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC - Reconciliation of professional and family life - Return from maternity leave of a worker member - Request for a reduction of working hours and for a change in work pattern - Situation which does not fall within the scope of Clause 6(1) of the revised Framework Agreement - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling))

(2016/C 305/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Estrella Rodríguez Sánchez

Applicant:

Defendant: Consum Sociedad Cooperativa Valenciana

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Barcelona (Social Court No 33, Barcelona, Spain) is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.

1

---
# CENTCOM logisticians learn value of overseas industry vetting program

/ Published March 24, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 
Two logisticians who support U.S. Central Command were briefed March 16 on the vetting process for DLA Troop Support’s overseas contracts.

William Sanders, CENTCOM director of contracting support, and met with each of DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains during the visit. He was joined by Michael Rector, DLA Joint Contingency Acquisition Support Office lead planner assigned to CENTCOM.

“We were interested in what is that network of contractors that you have, what are the contract structures and types that you have in place, and what type of vendor vetting capability do you have within the AOR,” Sanders said.

Vetting overseas contracts is conducted through DLA’s Industrial Base Extension Program, said Carolyn Shivers, a strategic sourcing specialist with the Construction and Equipment supply chain.  The program furnishes data from global logistics providers on a foreign country’s infrastructure, industry, cultural nuances and logistics capabilities to Department of Defense planners.

Information yielded through IBEX allowed for advance logistics planning for overseas locations and enabled a rapid U.S. response to global incidents, including the 2010 earthquake in Haiti and Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines in 2013, Shivers said.

As a JCASO planner, Rector said that he has to consider the commercial business environment in the countries within CENTCOM’s AOR and that vendor vetting through IBEX was of great interest to him.

“I really think it has a lot of capability, not just for CENTCOM but throughout DOD,” Rector said.

The JCASO program provides contract support for the DOD and other federal agencies. Two JCASO personnel are assigned to each unified combatant command to coordinate support for planning, exercises, training and deployments.

Rector added that every combatant command is now required to have the capability to vet their vendors and that the work Shivers does through the IBEX program could be the spearhead for the rest of the DOD.

“That capability is absolutely phenomenal and I see that the potential for it is enormous,” Rector said
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          9,981                  9,337
<SECURITIES>                                        0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,990                 27,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                      601                    578
<INVENTORY>                                    13,880                 13,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               55,379                 53,513
<PP&E>                                         26,382                 22,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,038                  9,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                103,710                100,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29,564                 30,278
<BONDS>                                        85,109                 85,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          14,152<F2>             13,226<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                         0                      0
<COMMON>                                     (29,400)               (31,860)
<OTHER-SE>                                          0                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  103,710                100,351
<SALES>                                       156,054                139,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              156,054                139,615
<CGS>                                         118,390                102,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 118,390                102,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   95                    111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,283                  3,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,246                  8,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,141                  3,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,105                  4,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                    122
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                  (582)
<CHANGES>                                           0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,105                  4,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0<F1>                  0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0<F1>                  0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> Earnings per share is not calculated in accordance with FAS No. 128
<F2> Preferred stock-mandatory includes preferred stock units
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7921.

#### Oscar Guerra Rodriguez, Jose Murillo, and Tommy Moreno, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1026,

178 L. Ed. 2d 848,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 697.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*849Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 652.