alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Johnson, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 272]

An appeal having *591been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), rendered February 1, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Renwick, J.R, Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.
No. 10-6060.

#### John P. Dunbar, Petitioner v. Hawaii.

562 U.S. 959, 131 S. Ct. 498,

178 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7977,

October 12, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 2, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
A bird’s eye view from a Blackhawk Helicopter
 
  By Commentary by Erik Wetterhall, DLA Aviation Customer Operations Directorate
Order entered July 25, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00519-CV

RUSSELL ELRICH JULIAN, Appellant

V.

QIN GU, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-00976-2022

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle

Before the Court is appellant’s June 2, 2022 emergency motion to stay the 

trial court’s judgment. On June 6, 2022, we stayed the trial court’s final judgment

pending further order of the Court, and we requested that appellee file a response 

to the motion.

After reviewing the motion and the accompanying affidavit, appellee’s 

response, and appellant’s reply, we conclude that appellant has failed to show his 
entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we LIFT the stay issued by our 

June 6, 2022 order.1

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE 

1

Justice Schenck would have continued the stay pending resolution of the appeal.
No. 10-5580.

#### Gary Lee White, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 929, 131 S. Ct. 321,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7386.

178 L. Ed. 2d 209,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 1210.
No. 10-6390.

#### In re Derrick Anthony Polly, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 959, 131 S. Ct. 495,

178 L. Ed. 2d 316,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7871.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Pettiford, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 608]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered on or about February 20, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
No. 10-6195.

#### David Wyatt Jones, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1012, 131 S. Ct. 525,

178 L. Ed. 2d 386,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8515.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*387Same case below, 607 F.3d 1346.
No. 10-5953.

#### Ricky Starks, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 420,

178 L. Ed. 2d 327,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8281.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# DLA Land and Maritime celebrates Army birthday 

/ Published June 29, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Following a stirring rendition of the National Anthem, the audience shouted their approval with the Army’s universal expression – “hooah!”

Current and former service members from all military branches along with federal civilians and contractors gathered at Defense Supply Center Columbus to celebrate the Army’s 241st birthday. 

The event took place inside DSCC’s Building 20 auditorium June 14 and included a guest speaker, a formal cake cutting ceremony, a photo slideshow, and an enthusiastic rendition of the Army Song. 

During his welcome remarks, Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Acquisition Executive Milton Lewis noted that despite many modern innovations, the Army’s principles and beliefs remain unchanged.   

“Our soldiers were once untrained farmers, merchants and tradesmen using their own rifles,” Lewis said. “Today, our Army has the very best equipment, training, leadership and medical care available. What has not changed is the fighting spirit and values of the American soldier.”

DLA Land and Maritime shares many of those same institutional values, and many of its associates have prior military experience, including Lewis’ own 29 years of Army service. He reminded the audience that the Army’s history continues to be updated each day. 

“The Army has almost 190 thousand soldiers committed in 140 countries. Service members are still fighting for their brothers and sisters in arms,” Lewis said. “And along the way, they’re adding bright chapters to an already illustrious volume of battle honors.”

The event’s invited guest speaker was also no stranger to military service. With more than three and a half decades of service in the Army, Maj. Gen. (ret.) Dennis Laich commanded troops throughout his career across multiple continents. 

“There are no former soldiers, there are no ex-soldiers, there are only soldiers,” Laich told the crowd. “Not just on the Army’s birthday, but every day of the year we should be proud of our service. We should be proud of our sacrifices. For 365 days a year – we are soldiers.”

The ceremony included a photo slideshow highlighting DSCC installation personnel who have served or are currently serving in the Army. Many in the audience smiled as they recognized images of coworkers wearing service uniforms, military physical fitness outfits, or camouflage.

During the traditional cake cutting ceremony, Laich joined the oldest soldier in attendance, Chief Warrant Officer 3 Paul Pitzer, along with Sgt. Nicholas Noren, the youngest soldier at the event. Together with Lewis, the four raised a ceremonial sword in unison and sliced the Army birthday cake. 

After the cake ceremony, the audience all rose to their feet and sang the Army Song. At the conclusion of the song, loud “hooahs!” echoed throughout the auditorium, a clear show of endorsement by everyone in attendance.
# DLA Distribution practices the Continuity of Operations Plan 

/ Published May 18, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
In keeping with the efforts to strengthen preparedness capabilities, the Continuity of Operations planners of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution recently took the Emergency Relocation Group to an alternate work site.  Federal Continuity Directive 1, dated October 26, 2012, governs the COOP program, and training visits to alternate work sites are one of its annual requirements. It states there are four pillars of continuity capabilities: leadership, staff, communication and facilities. 

Government agencies are required to have these sites in order to maintain operations during a continuity event.  A continuity event can be anything from a fire that destroys part of a building, to a natural disaster, or the threat or occurrence of a terrorist attack.  Any event that makes it impossible for employees to work in their regular facilities could result in the activation of the COOP plan.

The Emergency Relocation Group, made up of Distribution employees from six staff directorates, left New Cumberland, Pa., at 8:30 a.m. and traveled to the alternate site.  Additionally, the DLA Distribution Expeditionary Team supported the COOPEX. This COOPEX gave participating personnel familiarity with procedures, travel routes, and facility and communications capabilities so that they are ready to maintain DLA Distribution’s Mission Essential Functions during an actual continuity event.  Additionally, the exercise highlighted gaps and opportunities for the COOP planners that would not have been apparent without the deployment.  

According to Scott Rosbaugh, director, Office of Future Plans, DLA Distribution, “When all nine Federal Emergency Management Agency training objectives were met at the end of the second day of the COOPEX, Brig. Gen. Dix called for ENDEX. The COOPEX planners are now conducting a survey of participants and will begin working to resolve issues and build on achievements for future exercises and continuity events.”
# C_2017038EN.01002401.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2016 — TestBioTech and Others v Commission

(Case T-177/13) (1)

1

((Environment - Genetically modified products - Genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 - Request for internal review of the decision on marketing authorisation dismissed as unfounded - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment))

(2017/C 038/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: TestBioTech eV (Munich, Germany), European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV (Braunschweig, Germany), Sambucus eV (Vahlde, Germany) (represented by: K. Smith, QC, and J. Stevenson, Barrister)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by C. Cattabriga and P. Oliver, and subsequently by P. Cattabriga and L. Flynn and, lastly, by C. Cattabriga, L. Flynn and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by E. Jenkinson and L. Christie, and subsequently by L. Christie and, lastly, by S. Brandon, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes, Barrister), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented by D. Detken and S. Gabbi, acting as Agents) and Monsanto Europe (Antwerp, Belgium) and Monsanto Company (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: M. Pittie, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 8 January 2013, concerning the review of Commission Implementing Decision 2012/347/EU of 28 June 2012 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 (MON-877Ø1-2 x MON-89788-1), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2012 L 171, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV and Sambucus eV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV and Sambucus eV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Monsanto Europe and Monsanto Company to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Monsanto Europe and Monsanto Company to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

1

---
# C_2013171EN.01003903.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/39

---

Action brought on 30 April 2013 — ICT v Commission

(Case T-243/13)

2013/C 171/79

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA (ICT) (Borgo a Mozzano, Italy) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission.

---
No. 10-6816.

#### George L. Mothershed, Petitioner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association.

562 U.S. 1071, 131 S. Ct. 664,

178 L. Ed. 2d 496,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9403.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 779.
No. 10-6652.

#### Christopher Hayden, et ux., Petitioners v. Anthony E. D’Amico, et al.

562 U.S. 1059, 131 S. Ct. 685,

178 L. Ed. 2d 474,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9185,

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma paup-*475eris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2017-0200.

#### State v. Mason.

Marion App. No. 9-16-34, 2016-Ohio-8400.

O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicatedbelow, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  May 15, 2006

|   |   |  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.                 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.    President and     Chairman of the Board 
                                                   

 

 

  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 of Elbit Medical  Imaging Ltd. (the  "Company") as filed
with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date
hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Shimon Yitzhaki, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                   By: /s/ Shimon Yitzhaki
                                       ----------------------------------
                                   Name: Shimon Yitzhaki
                                   Title: President, Chief Financial Officer and
                                   Director
                                   Date: June 30, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to Elbit  Medical  Imaging  Ltd.  and will be  retained by Elbit
Medical Imaging Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
Tips From Former Smokers Tips 2019/TV

Leonard Nimoy/TV “More Time” :30

The spot opens on the Tips From A Former Smoker’s Wife logo and cuts to a shot of Susan speaking to 

the camera. Her name and state (California) are displayed on screen.

SUSAN N: I’m Susan Nimoy. I was married to Leonard Nimoy. 

The spot cuts to an image of Susan and Leonard on their anniversary. 

SUSAN N: He had chronic breathing difficulties for as long as I knew him. 

The spot cuts to an image of Leonard Nimoy in a wheelchair wearing an oxygen cannula. The text on 

screen reads “Leonard Nimoy smoked and got COPD.”

SUSAN N: He was afraid he’d die of lung cancer. He never thought it would be COPD.

We now see another image of a younger and healthier Leonard and Susan smiling together and the 

spot cuts to the art card, which reads. “Smoking caused Leonard Nimoy’s COPD. And his death.”

SUSAN N: You always think you have more time than you do. And you really don’t. 

ANNCR: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS.

ART CARD: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS. CDC LOGO

SPONSORED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

#CDCTIPS
# C_2015034EN.01003601.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — PP Nature-Balance Lizenz v Commission

(Case T-189/13) (1)

1

((Medicinal products for human use - Active substance tolperisone - Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC - Commission decision ordering the Member States to vary the national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance at issue - Burden of proof - Proportionality))

(2015/C 034/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PP Nature-Balance Lizenz GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Ambrosius, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. R. Killmann and M. Šimerdová, then B. R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2013) 369 (final) of 21 January 2013 concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for the medicinal products for human use which contain the active substance ‘tolperisone’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PP Nature-Balance Lizenz GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PP Nature-Balance Lizenz GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 8.6.2103.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 17, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
as of January 30, 2000, and January 31, 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended January 30, 2000, which report
appears in the January 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-
ALCO Stores, Inc.



     /s/  KPMG LLP
          KPMG LLP

          Wichita, Kansas
          April 26, 2000


<PAGE 48>
</PAGE>
Exhibit
32.2








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and is not filed as
provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamics Research Corporation,
a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      16, 2009
            /s/
      David KeleherSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer