alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

              Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Escalade, Incorporated on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475 and 333-52477)
of our reports dated February 16, 2006, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Martin Yale
International GmbH as of December 31, 2005 and December 25, 2004, and for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 16, 2006, on our audit of the internal
control over financial reporting of the Company as of December 31, 2005, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ FALK & Co GmbH

FALK & Co GmbH
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
Steuerberatungsgesellschaft
Heidelberg/Germany,

March 13, 2007


                                       62
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2009


/S/ COREY M. HOROWITZ
-------------------------------
COREY M. HOROWITZ
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
No. 10-7082.

#### Louis David Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Dean Velmer, et al.

562 U.S. 1129, 131 S. Ct. 916,

178 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 571.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *741denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 10-6059.

#### Lakenya T. Riley, Petitioner v. Union Parish School Board, et al.

562 U.S. 1106, 131 S. Ct. 848,

178 L. Ed. 2d 553,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9630,

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Eaken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 17, 2004      /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                         Principal Executive Officer
                         Principal Financial Officer
No. D-2482.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Jeffrey Thomas Kipi.

562 U.S. 999, 131 S. Ct. 555,

178 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8366.

November 1, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 41, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1131, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5566.
No. 10-6341.

#### Gomez T. Cook, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 599,

178 L. Ed. 2d 438,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8860.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 38 So. 3d 135.
# C_2014245EN.01001401.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2014 — Golam v OHIM — meta Fackler Arzneimittel (METABIOMAX)

(Case T-281/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark METABIOMAX - Earlier national word mark metabiarex - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 245/19

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sofia Golam (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Trovas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: meta Fackler Arzneimittel GmbH (Springe, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 March 2013 (Case R 2022/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between meta Fackler Arzneimittel GmbH and Ms Sofia Golam

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Sofia Golam to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Sofia Golam to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
exv4w3



 




Exhibit 4.3


DEED OF AMENDEMENT




to




THE GF NON-EXECUTIVE SHARE PLAN




Page 1 of 4









 







DEED OF AMENDMENT



to



THE GF NON EXECUTIVE SHARE PLAN

(“plan”)




	1.	 	INTRODUCTION





	 	1.1	 	On 31 October 2000, the plan was adopted by the shareholders of the company
in general meeting.
	 
	 	1.2	 	Clause 10 of the plan provides, inter alia, that it shall be competent for
Exco to amend the provisions of the plan, provided that the sanction of the
company in general meeting and the JSE is required in certain special
instances.
	 
	 	1.3	 	Exco has agreed to amend the plan in the manner set out below.
	 
	 	1.4	 	It is recorded that:





	 	1.4.1	 	this amendment has, or will shortly, be approved by the JSE
Securities Exchange; and



Page 2 of 4









 










	 	1.4.2	 	in terms of clause 10.2.1 of the plan, this amendment also requires the
sanction of the company in general meeting as it affects the eligibility of
participants under the plan.





	2.	 	AMENDMENT
	 
	 	 	Clause 1.1.6 the plan is hereby amended by substituting each reference
therein to the “Chairman” with a reference to the “Chief Executive
Officer”. As such, clause 1.1.6 will be amended to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	“ “Exco” — the Non-Executive Directors Remuneration Committee comprising
the Chief Executive Officer of the company and two other nominees
appointed by the Chief Executive Officer from time to time, to
administer the plan.”
	 
	3.	 	OPERATION OF THE AMENDMENT
	 
	 	 	The amendment to the plan contained in 2 shall apply with effect from the
date on which this amendment is approved by the shareholders of the
company in general meeting.
	 
	4.	 	GENERAL





	 	4.1	 	Unless the context clearly indicates a contrary intention, words and
expressions in the plan shall bear the same meanings in this deed of
amendment.
	 
	 	4.2	 	Save for the amendment in 2, the provisions of the plan shall remain
unaltered and in full force and effect.
	 
	 	4.3	 	If there is any conflict between the provisions of the plan and this
deed of amendment the provisions of this amendment shall prevail.



Page 3 of 4









 








This amendment to the GF Non-Executive Share Plan was agreed to at a meeting of
the company held at Johannesburg on 6 December 2002.




/s/ Chris Thompson

CHAIRMAN




Page 4 of 4
Order entered February 2 3 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00861
- CR No. 05
- 20
- 0086 2
- CR RAYAN DHANES GANESH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 282 nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 16
- 76113
- S & F16
- 76111
- S

O RDER Appellant ’ s brief , initially due on November 29, 2020, has not been filed . In ad dition, the clerk ’ s record does not contain the trial court ’ s certification of appellant ’ s right to appeal the September 14, 2020 judgments revoking community supervision. These appeals cannot proceed with out the trial court ’ s certification s of appellant ’ s right to appeal or appellant ’ s brief.W e ORDER th e t rial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

app ellant’s b rief has not been filed. In this regard, th e tria l court shall make appropriate finding s and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute th ese a ppeal s , w he t h er appellan t has abandoned the appeal s , or whether appointed counse l has aba ndoned the appeal s . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38 .8 ( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appel lant’s presence at the hearing, the trial c ourt shall conduct the hearing in appe llant’s ab s enc e. See Mez a v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 198 7, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indig en t, the trial court is ORDERED to take such m easures as may be necessary to assure effec tive representation, which may include appointme n t of ne w counse l

. We ORDER the trial court to complete and cause to be filed , in a supplemental clerk ’ s record in each appeal, certifica tions that accurate ly re flect
appe llant ’ s right to appeal the September 14, 2020 judgments in these appeals.
We ORDER the trial court t o transmit a record of the proce edings regarding appellant ’ s brief , which shall include written findin gs and r ecommendations, to this Court within T HIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DI RECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to t h e Hon or able Ambe r Givens , Presiding Judge, 282nd Judicial District Court ; to J. Daniel Oliphant ; and to the Dallas County Di strict Attorney’s Office , Appellate Division

.Th ese appeal s are ABATE D to allow the trial court to comply with the

above order. The appeal s shal l b e re instate d t hirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are receive d, w hichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Jaden T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 270]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about April 19, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations and its conclusion that appellant took part in an attack on the victim.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.
No. 10-5185.

#### Charles R. Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 255,

178 L. Ed. 2d 169,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7056.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 340.
Form of Payment Election for Director Pay under the NCR Management Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 NCR BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
 PAYMENT ELECTION FOR DIRECTOR PAY 
  
 As
provided in the NCR Directors Compensation Program, I hereby elect to receive my annual retainer and meeting fees earned after January 1, 2005,* as follows: 
  

	•	In cash payable in quarterly installments as earned under the program. 

  


	•	In shares of NCR common stock, payable at the same time(s) as the cash retainer. 

  

	•	50% in cash and 50% in shares of NCR common stock, payable at the same times as the cash retainer. 

  

	•	As a Deferred Stock Award, with the deferred amounts paid at the following time(s): 

  

	 	•	on the date of my termination as a Director (or such later date as may be required under applicable regulations); or 

  

	 	•	in          one,          two,
            three,             four, or
            five (check one option) annual installment(s), beginning on the April 30 following my termination as a Director (or such later date as may be required under applicable
regulations). 

  

	 	Note:	If a “rolling” distribution with a separate schedule for each year’s pay is desired, please contact NCR’s Executive Compensation department for additional
deferral options. 

  
 As provided in the NCR Directors Compensation
Program, I hereby elect to receive any annual stock grants earned after January 1, 2005,** as follows: 
  

	 	•	In current shares of NCR common stock. 

  

	 	•	As a Deferred Stock Award, payable at the time(s) elected above. 



	*	This election form supersedes all previous forms completed by me, and will remain in effect until a new form is completed by me at a later date. 


	**	This election applies to the deferral of any portion of my 2004 annual retainer/fees earned in 2005, and supersedes any prior elections of such portion of my retainer/fees.


  

			
	  

	 	  


	Signature	 	Date

  
 THIS FORM MUST BE
RETURNED BY DECEMBER 31, 2004.
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley Inc. as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2007
    
    
    
    May 10, 2007
  34
# C_2013359EN.01000501.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 25 September 2013 — Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark, acting on behalf of Poul Landin v TEKNIQ, acting on behalf of ENCO A/S — VVS

(Case C-515/13)

2013/C 359/06

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark, acting on behalf of Poul Landin

Applicant:

Defendant: TEKNIQ, acting on behalf of ENCO A/S — VVS

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the prohibition of direct discrimination on grounds of age contained in Articles 2 and 6 of Directive 2000/78/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from maintaining a legal situation whereby an employer, upon dismissal of a salaried employee who has been continuously employed in the same undertaking for 12, 15 or 18 years, must, upon termination of the salaried employee’s employment, pay an amount equivalent to one, two or three months’ salary respectively, while this allowance is not to be paid where the salaried employee, upon termination of employment, is entitled to receive a State retirement pension?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
SYSTEM EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND
NORTEL NETWORKS INC.
 Cricket Communications, Inc Nortel Networks Inc
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS, *** ***
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1.
    
    Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as in the
Contract.2.
    
    Add a new Section 11.0 ( ***Offer) to Attachment 1 to Amendment No. 3 (as
amended by Amendment No. 5) as follows:11.0 ***Offer.***
 
 ***
    
    Portions of this page have been omitted pursuant to a request for Confidential Treatment and filed separately with the Commission.




---



##### 



3.
    
    Except as specifically modified by Amendment No. 6, the Contract in all other respects shall
continue in full force and effect.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
    
    NORTEL NETWORKS INC.By:
    
    /s/ John Saboe
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Lance LevinName:
    
    John Saboe
    
    Name:
    
    Lance Levin(Type/Print)
    
    
    
    (Type/Print)Title:
    
    VP Engineering
    
    Title:
    
    Counsel, North AmericaDate:
    
    8-31-06
    
    Date:
    
    August 31. 2006
Exhibit 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below does hereby make, constitute and appoint Stevan R. Schott, Susan S. Mullins
and Douglas L. Rabuzzi, and each of them severally, such persons true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for such person and in such persons name, place and stead, to sign the Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file such Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and does hereby grant unto such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as said person might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agents and each of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                      |  |        
|--------------------- |  | -------
|/s/ Doreen E. Boyce   |  | 2/25/05
|Doreen E. Boyce       |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Robert P. Bozzone |  | 2/25/05
|Robert P. Bozzone     |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Charles C. Cohen  |  | 2/25/05
|Charles C. Cohen      |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Sigo Falk         |  | 2/25/05
|Sigo Falk             |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Joseph C. Guyaux  |  | 2/25/05
|Joseph C. Guyaux      |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ David M. Kelly    |  | 2/25/05
|David M. Kelly        |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Morgan K. OBrien |  | 2/25/05
|Morgan K. OBrien     |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ Steven S. Rogers  |  | 2/28/05
|Steven S. Rogers      |  | Date   
|                      | 
|/s/ John D. Turner    |  | 2/26/05
|John D. Turner        |  | Date
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23

        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 2-69243) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-01526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation
1983 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive
Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77865)
pertaining to the EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO
Corporation 1997 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation
1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-105265) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 2002 Long-term Incentive Plan of EDO
Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111483) pertaining to
the Universal Shelf, as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-129353) pertaining to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and in the
related Prospectus of our reports dated February 24, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of EDO Corporation, EDO
Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of EDO Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
February 24, 2006