alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Wage Committee, Meetings

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Pub. L. 
92-463, gives notice that meetings of the VA Wage Committee will be 
held on:

Wednesday, July 15, 1998, at 2 p.m.
Wednesday, August 12, 1998, at 2 p.m.
Wednesday, August 26, 1998, at 2 p.m.
Wednesday, September 9, 1998, at 2 p.m.

    The meetings will be held in Room 246, Department of Veterans 
Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420.
    The Committee's purpose is to advise the Under Secretary for Health 
on the development and authorization of wage schedules for Federal Wage 
System (blue-collar) employees.
    At these meetings the Committee will consider wage survey 
specifications, wage survey data, local committee reports and 
recommendations, statistical analyses, and proposed wage schedules.
    All portions of the meetings will be closed to the public because 
the matters considered are related solely to the internal personnel 
rules and practices of the Department of Veterans Affairs and because 
the wage survey data considered by the Committee have been obtained 
from officials of private business establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence. Closure of the meetings is in 
accordance with subsection 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Pub. 
L. 94-409, and as cited in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4).
    However, members of the public are invited to submit material in 
writing to the Chairperson for the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning these meetings may be obtained 
from the Chairperson, VA Wage Committee (05), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17008 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hamuja Hydara, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 267]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis J. Boyle, J.), rendered January 14, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is *585unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Gische and Moulton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 FOR AREMISSOFT CORPORATION AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.    
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,082
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 15,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (639)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21,009
<PP&E>                                         6,761  
<DEPRECIATION>                                (4,776)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                26,363 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         30,806 
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          10
<OTHER-SE>                                    (6,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  26,363
<SALES>                                       13,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13,112
<CGS>                                          3,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,605 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                     395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              803
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .08
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
November 13, 2008





/S/Hyung
Soon Lee


Principal
Executive Officer


Principal
Financial Officer




25
No. 10-6917.

#### Denys Ray Hughes, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1036, 131 S. Ct. 585,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8782.

178 L. Ed. 2d 427,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21

QUIXOTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
as of June 30, 2008

QUIXOTE CORPORATION (PARENT)

Jurisdiction Under Which OrganizedQuixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

DelawareTranSafe Corporation

DelawareNu-Metrics, Inc.

PennsylvaniaHighway Information Systems, Inc.

DelawareSurface Systems, Inc.

MissouriSensing Systems, Ltd.

United Kingdom*U.S. Traffic Corporation

DelawareQuixote Transportation Safety Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.

MexicoEnergy Absorption Systems, Inc.

DelawareE-Tech Testing Services, Inc.

DelawareEnergy Absorption Systems (Europe), Inc.

DelawareQuixote Asia Pacific, Inc.

DelawareQuixote Europe, Inc.

DelawareEnergy Absorption Systems (AL) LLC

Delaware*Peek Traffic Corporation

DelawareQuixote International Enterprises, LLC.

DelawareQuixote (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongQuixote (Beijing) Co., Ltd

Peoples Republic of China*

Quixote Traffic Corporation

DelawareQuixote Transportation Technologies, Inc.

DelawareQuixote Foreign Sales, Inc.

U.S. Virgin IslandsQuixote Latin America, Inc.

DelawareQuixote Middle East/Africa, Inc.

DelawareQuixote Middle East LLC

UAE


---

Quixote
Transportation Safety, Inc., Quixote Traffic Corporation (until July 25, 2008), Quixote Transportation Technologies, Inc., Quixote Latin
America, Inc., Quixote Middle East/Africa, Inc. and Quixote Foreign Sales Corporation are wholly-owned by Quixote Corporation.

TranSafe
Corporation, Surface Systems, Inc., U.S. Traffic Corporation (until July 25, 2008), Peek Traffic Corporation (until July 25, 2008), Energy Absorption
Systems, Inc., Quixote (Hong Kong) Limited, and Quixote International Enterprises, LLC are wholly-owned by Quixote Transportation Safety, Inc.

All
subsidiaries listed under TranSafe Corporation, Surface Systems, Inc., U.S. Traffic Corporation (until July 25, 2008), Energy Absorption Systems, Inc., Quixote
Middle East/Africa, Inc. and Quixote International Enterprises, LLC are wholly-owned by those corporations.

---
# DLA Aviation keeps F/A-18 jets soaring 

/ Published March 14, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia,
# C_2015198EN.01003501.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2015 — CC v Parliament

(Case T-457/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cross-appeal - Civil service - Open competition - Errors in the management of the list of successful candidates - Non-contractual liability - Material harm - Legitimate expectations - Distortion of the facts - Loss of an opportunity - Non-material harm - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 198/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: CC (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Maximini, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and E. Despotopoulou, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 in CC v Parliament (F-9/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:116), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

CC

Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 in CC v Parliament (F-9/12); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 in CC v Parliament (F-9/12);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2695 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To rename the Success Dam in Tulare County, California, 

as the Richard L. Schafer Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2695 RFS

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF DAM. 

2 (a) RENAMING.—The Success Dam in Tulare Coun3 ty, California, shall hereafter be known and designated as 

4 the ‘‘Richard L. Schafer Dam’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula6 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

8 considered to be a reference to the Richard L. Schafer 

9 Dam. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, R. Scott Rowe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Flowserve Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  R. Scott RoweR. Scott RowePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: February 21, 2019
No. 10-6584.

#### Steven C. Perrine, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 440,

178 L. Ed. 2d 341,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8225.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 838.
No. 10-7100.

#### Miguel Encarnacion-Montero, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 671,

178 L. Ed. 2d 499,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9435.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Opinion issued July 11, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00169-CV

———————————

TARANTINO PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant

V.

SAMUEL BONILLA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-71801

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 6, 2023, appellant, Tarantino Properties, Inc., filed a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s December 7, 2022 final judgment in favor of appellee, 

Samuel Bonilla. On June 27, 2023, the parties, representing that they had “settled 
2

the case,” filed a “Joint Motion to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment, Release 

Supersedeas Bond, and Dismiss Appeal.” 

In their motion, the parties stated that they had reached an agreement in which 

appellee “agreed to release all claims against” appellant, and therefore “jointly 

request[ed] that this Court dismiss this appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment 

without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court with instructions 

to release [appellant] and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on December 

27, 2022.” See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B). The parties’ motion further stated 

that “[c]osts on appeal should be taxed against the party who incurred the same.” 

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion, dismiss the appeal, set aside the 

trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement, including 

the release of appellant and its surety from the Supersedeas Bond filed on December 

27, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(e). We direct the Clerk of this 

Court that costs are to be taxed against the party incurring the same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,562,919
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    186,564
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         368,128
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       722,568
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,840,179
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      831,151
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            172,682
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,003,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,000
<PREFERRED>                                    223,503<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,218,276
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   75,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     37,540
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                22,523
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,256,504
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,840,179
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,164,941
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            76,783
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     880,773
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     957,556
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        207,385
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              32,830
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 240,215
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        98,395<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   141,820
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,022
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  137,798
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       129,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       87,420
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         316,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Includes $11,895 of Preference Stock
<F2>Includes $12,562 of Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend 
    Requirements
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                              THE BANC CORPORATION
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Banc Corporation
(the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 10, 2004                            /s/ David R. Carter
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   David R. Carter
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00263**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 00263\00263_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00263\00263_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00263\00263_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00263\00263_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00263\00263_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00263\Certification Statement Plant ID 00263.pdf Plant certification statement x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00263\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\00263_Wabash River D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00263\00263_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00263\00263_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Carew, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 658]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered September 28, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of assault in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The testimony elicited upon the cross-examination of the defendant’s alibi witnesses was probative of their bias and interest in the outcome of the case, and outweighed any possible prejudice or confusion which may have arisen from its admission into evidence *(see People v Brown,*62 AD2d 715, 720 [1978], *affd*48 NY2d 921 [1979]; *see also People v Glennon,*175 NY 45, 52 [1903]; *People v Green,*156 AD2d 465 [1989]; *People v Rahman,*62 AD2d 968, 969 [1978], *affd*46 NY2d 882 [1979]). Therefore, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in admitting the testimony *(see People v Duffy,*36 NY2d 258, 262-263 [1975], *cert denied*423 US 861 [1975]).

However, as correctly noted by the People, the count of assault in the second degree upon which the defendant was convicted constituted a concurrent inclusory count of the conviction of assault in the first degree *(see People v Grier,*37 NY2d 847 [1975]; *People v Martir,*262 AD2d 333, 334 [1999]). Accordingly, the conviction of assault in the second degree must be vacated, and that count of the indictment dismissed.

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Stokes,*132 AD2d 718, 719 [1987]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.