alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014339EN.01001902.xml

| 29.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/19

---

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)

(Case T-721/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Bolloré (Ergué Gabéric, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2013 (Case R 1961/2912-2) concerning cancellation proceedings between Bolloré and The Directv Group, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its costs, including those incurred by the defendant and the other party to the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its costs, including those incurred by the defendant and the other party to the proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.

1

---
# C_2013129EN.01003101.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/31

---

Action brought on 14 January 2013 — CK v Commission

(Case F-3/13)

2013/C 129/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CK (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the applicant’s career development report.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the career development report for 2011 drawn up on 14 February 2012 and definitively adopted on 9 March 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the career development report for 2011 drawn up on 14 February 2012 and definitively adopted on 9 March 2012;

| — | order the Commission to pay EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm which resulted from that report; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm which resulted from that report;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-6674.

#### Richard B. Fuller, Petitioner v. Richard E. Bazzle, Warden.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 657,

178 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9410.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 334.
No. 10-7153.

#### Guy T. Harris, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 1114, 131 S. Ct. 833,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9716,

178 L. Ed. 2d 567,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Philip A. GarciaDate: August 12, 2005
    
    Philip A. Garcia, Executive Vice President & CFO
 78
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.13 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.13 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.13 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.13 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
TAKE ON 

TB

Too many people in 

the U.S. still suffer from 

tuberculosis (TB). 

TB IN THE U.S.

Up to

13 million

people could have 

latent TB infection

8,331 people

were diagnosed with 

TB disease in 2022

602 people

died of TB-related 

causes in 2021

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on 

TB trends in the United States are complex 

and will likely persist for many years.

HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS CAN TAKE ACTION TO END TB 

1 Think TB

Recognize 

risk factors 

and 

symptoms 

of TB.

2 Test for TB

Use the TB 

blood test 

for people at 

increased risk 

of TB. 

3 Treat TB

Prescribe 

shorter 

regimens 

to help 

patients finish 

treatment.

TB CAN HAPPEN ANYWHERE & TO ANYONE

But some groups are at greater risk of TB than others. To eliminate TB, we must prioritize groups at increased risk of TB. 

7 out of 10

TB cases occurred among 

non-U.S.–born persons

Racial and 

ethnic 

disparities 

in TB 

diagnoses 

continue 

to exist.

CDC IS COMMITTED TO ENDING TB IN THE UNITED STATES

CDC supports finding and treating TB disease and expanding testing and treatment for latent TB infection through:

Vigilant 

surveillance

Better diagnostics & 

treatment options

THINK TB!

Engaging affected 

communities & 

medical providers

Supporting local 

& state health 

departments

To learn more about TB, visit: 

www.cdc.gov/tb

OCTOBER 2023
DLA Document Services success story: Records-management solution for Joint Personal Property Shipping Office
 
  By Gina Napoli, DLA Document Services
S91A0641.

#### GEARING et al. v. GEARING.

(403 SE2d 809)

Decided May 10, 1991.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, William M. Droze, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellants.

*John W. Timmons, Jr.,*for appellee.

Hunt, Justice.

The parties were divorced in 1982. The former husband contested paternity, but did not appeal the judgment requiring him to pay support for the minor child. In 1990, the former husband filed a motion to determine paternity, and to suspend his child support obligation. Based on the results of a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) blood-typing test, the trial court found the former husband was not the child’s father, and relieved him from his support obligation.

Once there has been a final determination of paternity, a party may not relitigate that issue without first showing, inter alia, that his failure to contest paternity earlier was not the result of a lack of due diligence. *Roddenberry v. Roddenberry,*255 Ga. 715, 717 (342 SE2d 464) (1986). The trial court made no findings in this regard and, accordingly, this case is remanded to the trial court for a consideration of the former husband’s due diligence in accordance with our holding in *Roddenberry v. Roddenberry,*supra.

*Judgment vacated and case remanded.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2016222EN.01001201.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2016 — Izsák and Dabis v Commission

(Case T-529/13) (1)

((Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - Cohesion policy - National minority regions - Refusal of registration - Manifest lack of powers of the Commission - Article 4(2)(b) and 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011))

(2016/C 222/12)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicants: Balázs-Árpád Izsák (Târgu Mureş, Romania) and Attila Dabis (Budapest, Hungary) (represented initially by J. Tordáné dr. Petneházy and subsequently by D. Sobor, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by H. Krämer, K. Talabér-Ritz, A. Steiblytė and P. Hetsch, and subsequently by K. Talabér-Ritz, K. Banks, H. Krämer and B.-R. Killman, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, G. Szima and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, acting as Agent), Romania (represented by: R. Radu, R. Haţieganu, D. Bulancea and M. Bejenar, acting as Agents) and Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 4975 final of 25 July 2013 rejecting the application for registration of the proposed European citizens’ initiative.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Mr Attila Dabis to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Mr Attila Dabis to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Hungary, the Hellenic Republic, Romania and the Slovak Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hungary, the Hellenic Republic, Romania and the Slovak Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

---
* The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3680

___________ Thomas Mark Zinna, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Dave Dormire, Superintendent, * Jefferson City Correctional Center, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 10, 2001 Filed: April 18, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, * District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Thomas Mark Zinna was convicted of second-degree burglary, stealing firearms, andsecond-degree property damage in Missouri state court. He was sentenced as a persistent offender

to imprisonment for forty years and six months. After exhausting** The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. -2- his state court remedies, Zinna filed a federal habeas petition. The district court ** deniedrelief, but granted a certificate of appealability on one claim: whether trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call coperpetrator Billy Long as a witness. During a state postconviction hearing, Long testified he would have told the jury Zinna was not involved in the robbery because he was sleeping at a motel at the time. At the same hearing, Zinna's trial attorney testified that several days before trial, Long told him, "I am going to hurt you. I am not going to help you." The state postconviction court found the attorney discussed the possibility of Long testifying with Zinna and he chose not to call Long as a witness as a matter of trial strategy. The court also heard Long's testimony and found he lacked credibility. On appeal, Zinna concedes the record supports the attorney's testimony at the postconviction proceeding, but argues Long's testimony there rendered counsel's decision not to call Long at trial unreasonable. We conclude the state courts did not unreasonably apply federal law in denying Zinna postconviction relief because the performance of Zinna's attorney was not deficient. See 28 U.S.C. § 2554(d)(1); Stricklandv. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 689-90 (1984). Besides, Zinna cannot establish the allegedly deficient performance prejudiced him, given the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. See id. at 694-95. We thus affirm the district court's denial of Zinna's habeas petition. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 10-6968.

#### Charles Tyson, Petitioner v. South Carolina.

562 U.S. 1072, 131 S. Ct. 668,

178 L. Ed. 2d 497,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9109.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leon Gentle, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 816]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme *652Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), imposed August 17, 2016, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; *People v Little,*127 AD3d 1235, 1235-1236 [2015]; *People v Brown,*122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Famoxadone Response to Comments DP No. D427905 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

MEMORANDUM 

Date: August 3, 2015 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

SUBJECT: Famoxadone. Response to Comments on the Scoping Document in Support of 

Registration Review. 

PC Code: 113202 DP Barcode: 0427905 

Decision No.: 506171 Registration No.: NA 

Petition Nos.: NA Regulatory Action: Registration Review 

Risk Assess Type: NA Case No.: NA 

TXRNo.: NA CAS Nos.: 13 1807-57-3 

MRIDNo.: NA 

FROM: 

THRU: 

TO: 

ldeliz Negr6n-Encamaci6Jn Chemist ~~, Katelynn King, Biologist · ~ ' 

Risk Assessment Branch 

Health Effects Division (7509P) 

Office of Pesticide Programs 

Michael Metzger, Branch Chiefμ~ { 

Risk Assessment Branch V 

Health Effects Division (7509P) [JJ 

Office of Pesticide Programs 

Christina Scheltema, Risk Manager Reviewer 

Neil Anderson, Branch Chief 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P) 

Office of Pesticide Programs 

Page 1 of2 
Famoxadone Response to Comments DP No. 0427905 

DuPont Crop Protection has submitted comments on the Health Effect's Division (HED) 

document titled Famoxadone. Human Health Assessment Scoping Documenl in Supporl of 

Registration Review (03104120 15, 0423286). HED has considered DuPont's comments (from 

their submission dated March 2015, DuPont Protection Response Comments to: Famoxadone 

Registralion Review Initial Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0094, Pages 3-4, and provides the 

following response. 

1. GDLN 860.1340 - Livestock enforcement Method and Independent Laboratory Validation 

DuPont Response: New studies have been conducted and will be submitted if requested 

(Animal Tissue Method, DuPont-33688 and the IL V, DuPont-33687). 

HED Response: Please, proceed to submit these studies. 

2. GDLN 860. 1380 - Storage Stability in Soil and Water 

HED Comment: This study seems to be part of the OPPTS 835 series for Fate, Transport 

and Transformation Test Guidelines, 860.1380 refers to storage stability in plants and 

li vestock matrices. We defer to the Environmental Fate and Effects Division with regards to 

this study. 

3. GDLN 870.3465 - 90-day Inhalation Toxicity - Rat 

DuPont Response: The additional study will be conducted if requested. 

HED Response: This study is a requirement for registration review. 

4. GDLN 875.2100 - Dislodgeable Foliar Residue 

DuPont Response: There is a dislodgeable foliar residue study on tomato on file at the 

Agency (DuPont- 11 40, MRTD 44946432). 

HED Response: We will proceed to evaluate the tomato dislodgeable foliar study on file at 

the Agency. The requirement of a OFR study will be discussed upon evaluation of the tomato 

study. 

Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 2-69243) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan
and the EDO Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-01526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive
Plan and the EDO Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1983 Long-term
Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO
Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77865)
pertaining to the EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO
Corporation 1997 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation
1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, of our reports dated February 11, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EDO Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



New York, New York
March 12, 2003