alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Know the Risks: A Parent’s Guide to E-cigarettes and Youth

INFORMATION FOR USERS

Purpose: CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) developed a presentation called, “Know the Risks: A 

Parent’s Guide to E-cigarettes,” to educate parents on youth e-cigarette use, including the health risks, 

the factors that lead to e-cigarette use, and what parents can do to help youth avoid all tobacco 

products, including e-cigarettes. 

URL: The presentation is available on OSH’s website. 

Length: The presentation will take approximately 45 minutes to deliver. 

Target Age Group: Parents of youth ages 11-18 

Intended Presenter(s): The presentation is intended to be delivered by adults who educate or serve 

youth ages 11-18. This could include teachers, coaches, Parent Teacher Associations, youth ministry 

leaders, etc. 

Format: The presentation includes the entire script so the presenter does not need additional 

information to deliver the presentation. If you have props available to make it hands-on and interactive, 

consider the following: 

• An e-cigarette such as a rechargeable e-cigarette, large tank device, medium tank device, or a 

disposable e-cigarette 

• Fake Brain 

• E-cigarette refillable liquid 

Qs & As: 

Can I modify these slides? No. The content contained within individual slides should not be modified.

Can I add or delete slides? Yes. However, CDC is neither responsible for, nor does it endorse, any added 

slides. 

Do I need to be an expert on e-cigarettes to deliver the presentation? No, the presentation was 

developed so that any adult who educates or serves youth ages 11-18 can deliver the presentation 

without prior knowledge of e-cigarettes. Since you are serving the parents of youth, CDC OSH has 

provided you the content you need to educate parents on the risks of e-cigarettes. 

Where can I find more information on e-cigarettes and youth? 

• Quick Facts on the Risks of E-cigarettes for Kids, Teens, and Young Adults | CDC 

• Know the Risks 

• Know the Risks: E-cigarettes & Young People | U.S. Surgeon General’s Report 

Does CDC have a presentation on e-cigarettes for youth? Yes, a companion presentation on ecigarettes and youth can be found here. We have more information about e-cigarettes on our website. 
Do I need to have internet access to deliver the presentation? You can download the presentation and 

save it on your computer from CDC OSH’s website. Once downloaded, you can deliver the presentation 

without internet access. 

Whom can I contact at CDC if I have any questions about the presentation? Please email the OSH 

Speakers Bureau at: oshspeakersbureau@cdc.gov if you have any questions. This email inbox is 

monitored regularly.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00227-CV

The State of Texas and Greg Abbott, 

in his official capacity as Attorney 

General of The State of Texas

v.

Valerie Saxion, Inc. and Valerie 

Saxion, Individually

§

§

§

§

From the 348th District Court

of Tarrant County (348-254931-11)

December 4, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

JUDGMENT

This court has considered Valerie Saxion’s cross-appeal in this case and 

holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that Saxion’s crossappeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

This court has also considered the record on appeal in this case and holds 

that there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is reversed as to the denial of the State’s plea to the jurisdiction. 

We render judgment dismissing Saxion’s free exercise and federal Religious 

Freedom Restoration Act claims, and we remand this case to the trial court for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is further ordered that appellee Valerie Saxion, Inc. and Valerie Saxion, 

individually, shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bob McCoy__________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          49,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,163
<INVENTORY>                                     25,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,041
<PP&E>                                          52,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,872
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,360
<SALES>                                        166,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,847
<CGS>                                           61,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (422)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (945)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
        

</TABLE>
[4910-13-PI

v

ONCUR"l:NCTiS

"~'TIIGISzrL

INITI,\IS1SIG

tV. flld~M

D.'TF,

5'-"Ho

RO\m,'Q W"80L

." - 7 !¥..(.

"ITIAU'SLG

C. C,love..-

DATE

3'-1;;(-10

"OU,I~G''-''iWL

- J 14

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-l 00-1 AI a (Challenger 300)

RlN 2120-AA64

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1214j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-091-ADj Amendmen

IQ61 0010-07-010

39-*****; AD H**_**_**)

14 CFR Part 39

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

3-j1-J~

ROuriNG ',"MHol

-)01

ACTION: Final rule.

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste "OUnNG~"'~

0

y-o

-100

7f];Aptn-7;

oMLi

3 ;C jei

There has been an incident during a production flight test where the

proximity-sensor electronic unit (PSEU) failed. This resulted in

unannunciated loss of:

INIT1AL,i"G

· \Vheel brakes below 10 knots;

· Thrust reverser;

· Nose wheel steering; and

· Auto-deployment of the multi-fill1ction spoilers.

A similar condition, if not corrected, may result in reduced controllability

of the aircraft upon landing and possible overrun of the nmway.

,

*

, , , , ,
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedric Kushner Promotions,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Cedric Kushner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Cedric  Kushner  Promotions,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Cedric
Kushner Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



Date: November 15, 2004                  /s/ Cedric Kushner
                                         ------------------
                                      Name:  Cedric Kushner
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2662 

To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Migrant Protection 

Protocols announced by the Secretary of Homeland Security on December 

20, 2018. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2019 

Ms. ESCOBAR (for herself, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. NORTON, Ms. GARCIA of 

Texas, Ms. OMAR, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. BONAMICI, Mrs. TORRES of California, Mrs. DAVIS

of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. DEAN, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

VELA, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. SCANLON, and Ms. 

MUCARSEL-POWELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Migrant 

Protection Protocols announced by the Secretary of 

Homeland Security on December 20, 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Seeker Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds as follows: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2662 IH

1 (1) The United States is a nation of immi2 grants. 

3 (2) The Immigration and Nationality Act allows 

4 for immigrants to apply for asylum regardless of 

5 manner of entry. 

6 (3) All individuals seeking asylum in the United 

7 States are entitled to due process and access to an 

8 attorney. Sending asylum seekers to another country 

9 limits or may completely eliminate their opportunity 

10 to meet with counsel, thereby lowering their chances 

11 of obtaining relief. 

12 (4) The Department of Homeland Security an13 nounced the Migrant Protection Protocols on De14 cember 20, 2018, and it has already had devastating 

15 consequences given that some migrants have been 

16 returned to Mexico even though they fear staying in 

17 the country. 

18 (5) The 2018 Department of State country re19 port for Mexico acknowledges serious and targeted 

20 risks faced by migrants and asylum seekers in, and 

21 transiting through, Mexico, such that it remains an 

22 unsafe place for many. 

23 (6) Current immigration law is broken and 

24 Congress must work to pass humane comprehensive 

25 immigration reform. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2662 IH

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING MIGRANT PROTECTION 

2 PROTOCOLS. 

3 None of the funds made available by any Act may 

4 be used to implement or enforce the Migrant Protection 

5 Protocols announced by the Secretary of Homeland Secu6 rity on December 20, 2018, or any subsequent revisions 

7 to those protocols. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
1

From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:23 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel 

leaking from Navy storage tanks in Red Hill. 

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty-five years is too long to wait before 

acting to save our most precious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the tanks must be 

emptied. 

I also ask that the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental 

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity 

to understand and weigh-in on this important issue. 

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision-making process. 

Thank you.
No. 10-383.

#### NIBCO, Inc., Petitioner v. Martha Rivera, et al.

562 U.S. 1135, 131 S. Ct. 906,

178 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 402.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 757.
YOU CAN QUIT SMOKING: HERE’S HOW

Quitting smoking is one of the most important steps you can take 

to improve your health. This is true no matter how old you are or 

how long you have smoked.

Many people who smoke become addicted to nicotine, a drug 

that is found naturally in tobacco. This can make it hard to quit 

smoking. But the good news is there are proven treatments that 

can help you quit.

` Talk to a quit smoking counselor 

individually or in a group

` Get free confidential coaching through 

a telephone quitline (1-800-QUIT-NOW)

` Use free online resources like 

CDC.gov/quit and Smokefree.gov

` Sign up for free texting programs 

like SmokefreeTXT

` Use a mobile app like quitSTART

YOU CAN:

Counseling

` Can help you make a plan to quit smoking. 

` Can help you prepare to cope with stress, urges to smoke, 

and other issues you may face when trying to quit.

If you are ready to quit: 

` Call a quitline coach (1-800-QUIT-NOW) or 

` Talk to a healthcare professional. 

They can help you decide what treatment is best for you and can 

connect you to quit smoking programs and resources. 

Remember, even if you’ve tried before, the key to success is to 

keep trying and not give up. After all, more than half of U.S. 

adults who smoked have quit.

Medications

Can help you manage withdrawal symptoms and cravings, 

which helps you stay confident and motivated to quit.

MANY OF THESE TREATMENTS AND RESOURCES MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU

FREE OF CHARGE OR MAY BE COVERED BY YOUR INSURANCE.

Counseling Medications

Using counseling and medication together gives you 

the best chance of quitting for good. 

Get Help Quitting Today

PLUS

For information about quitting 

smoking, visit CDC.gov/quit.

YOU CAN:

USE NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY (NRT) 

` over-the-counter forms: patch, gum, lozenge 

` prescription forms: inhaler, nasal spray

TALK TO YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ABOUT 

USING A PILL PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION

` varenicline ` bupropion

COMBINE MEDICATIONS

` Use a long-acting form of NRT (nicotine patch) 

together with a short-acting form (such as nicotine 

gum or lozenge). Compared to using one form of 

NRT, this combination can further increase your 

chances of quitting. 

NICOTINE
No. 10-7266.

#### Alexis Silva Rosa, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1149, 131 S. Ct. 930,

178 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 214.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Katelyn McMurray et al., Respondents, v Staten Island University Hospital et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[769 NYS2d 405]

— In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants Staten Island University Hospital, Steven Schwartzberg, Concord Neurological Associates & Neurosurgical Associates, PC., and Daniel Potaznik, appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated April 19, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict *799in favor of the plaintiff Katelyn McMurray and against them in the sums of $1.5 million for past pain and suffering and $1.5 million for future pain and suffering, upon an order of the same court dated March 4, 2002, inter alia, denying their motions to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404, and upon an order of the same court dated April 4, 2002, inter alia, granting of the plaintiffs’ motion to increase the attorney contingency fee to 24% of the jury’s award, is in favor of the plaintiff Katelyn McMurray and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, that branch of the motion which was to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of damages is granted, the order dated March 4, 2002, is modified accordingly, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only, unless, within 30 days after service upon the plaintiff Della McMurray, as guardian of Katelyn McMurray, of a copy of this decision and order, she shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the damages for past pain and suffering from the sum of $1,500,000 to the sum $600,000, and future pain and suffering from the sum of $1,500,000 to the sum of $350,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly; in the event that Della McMurray, as guardian of Katelyn McMurray, so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly; and it is further,

Ordered that in the event that Della McMurray, as guardian of Katelyn McMurray, stipulates in accordance herewith, the plaintiffs’ attorneys are awarded a fee in the sum of $228,000 (24% of $950,000).

The jury verdict on the issue of liability was both rational *(see Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]) and based on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]).

The award of damages for past and future pain and suffering, however, is excessive to the extent indicated *(see*CPLR 5501 [c]; *cf. Milne v Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 168,*302 AD2d 569 [2003]; *Julien v Physician’s Hosp.,*231 AD2d 678 [1996]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Smith, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
No. 10-7218.

#### Howard Ellis, Petitioner v. James Benedetti, et al.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 926,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 591,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 399 Fed. Appx. 227.
# I am DLA

/ Published Nov. 1, 2016
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
**My name is:**

Patricia Komondy.

****

**I am:**

The lead training coordinator at DLA Disposition Services at Battle Creek, Michigan, and cultural point of contact for Native American peoples.

****

**Describe your job in a sentence:**

I lead a team providing training support for all of DLA Disposition Services.

****

**How long have you worked at DLA?**

 I’ve been a full time employee since 2004 but began working for DLA as a contractor two years earlier.

****

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**

I’ve had the opportunity to hold some very interesting positions, and I’ve been able to work with some amazing individuals all over the world, including senior leaders at DLA.

****

**What are your best memories of working here?**

My family’s heritage includes the Mohawk, Cherokee, Cree and Powhatan tribes, and I’ve been able to educate our workforce about the rich culture, history and accomplishments of Native American people.

I organized an event on the importance of protecting Michigan’s water, including lakes and rivers, from pipeline leaks and other pollution. I brought in two speakers from local Native American communities. One talked about his work in the political realm, including the governor of Michigan. The other talked about water protection from a traditional Native perspective. The event was packed. And when it ran long, the directors of Disposition Services and Logistics Information Services chose to delay an important meeting rather than leave early.

****

**How do you make a difference?**

I hope I make a difference by supporting employees and warfighters so they can accomplish their daily mission. I try to treat each employee with respect and professionalism, and to meet their needs in a timely fashion or direct them to someone who can. I also hope I’ve made difference in educating and enlightening workforce as to history and accomplishments of Native American people.
No. 10-6254.

#### Montrell Vines, Petitioner v. A.P. Kane, Warden.

562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 568,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8799.

178 L. Ed. 2d 416,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50162

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALFONSO HUMBERTO GONZALEZ-MEDINA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-2027-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfonso Humberto Gonzalez-Medina appeals the sentence imposed for his

conviction for importation of 50 kilograms of more or marijuana. He contends

that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because it was greater than

necessary to accomplish the sentencing goals under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The

district court sentenced him to 30 months of imprisonment, the bottom of his

advisory guidelines range, and three years of nonreporting supervised release.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 21, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-50162 Document: 00512449789 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2013
No. 13-50162

The substantive reasonableness of a sentence is reviewed under an

abuse-of-discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

Because Gonzalez-Medina’s sentence was within his advisory guidelines range,

his sentence is presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Gomez-Herrera,

523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008). Gonzalez-Medina first contends that the

presumption of reasonableness should not apply to within-guidelines sentences

calculated under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, the guideline which applies to drug offenses

such as his, because § 2D1.1 is not based on empirical data or sentencing

research. That argument is foreclosed under circuit precedent. See United

States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v.

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir. 2009).

Next, Gonzalez-Medina argues that his 30-month sentence was

substantively unreasonable because § 2D1.1 lacks an empirical basis, he was a

first time offender with a limited role in a nonviolent drug crime, he became

involved in the drug operation because of financial difficulties, the collateral

consequences of his conviction included losing his Laser Visa card and becoming

subject to removal from the United States, and his age made it unlikely that he

would commit future crimes.

The district court listened to Gonzalez-Medina’s arguments for a lesser

sentence but found that a 30-month sentence was appropriate. “[T]he

sentencing judge is in a superior position to find facts and judge their import

under § 3553(a) with respect to a particular defendant.” United States v.

Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). Gonzalez-Medina has

not shown that his sentence was an abuse of discretion. See id.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-50162 Document: 00512449789 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2013