alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36700-36706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[FDA 225-96-6000]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and the Defense Alliance for Advanced Medical 
Terminology

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and the Defense 
Alliance for Advanced Medical Terminology (DAAMT). The purpose of the 
MOU is to enable government agencies to exchange information and 
jointly pursue research endeavors related to medical device safety and 
effectiveness.

DATES: The agreement became effective October 17, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas B. Shope, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health (HFZ-140), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-3314, ext. 32.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and memoranda of understanding 
between FDA and others shall be published in the Federal Register, the 
agency is publishing notice of an MOU.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F

[[Page 36701]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.000



[[Page 36702]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.001



[[Page 36703]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.002



[[Page 36704]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.003



[[Page 36705]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.004



[[Page 36706]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07JY98.005


[FR Doc. 98-17859 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

p1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139200 

MARQUETTE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139200 

 COA: 285697 

Baraga CC: 08-005771-CK 

BRYAN K. CHOSA, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

COUNTY OF BARAGA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
October 14, 2008
 
 
 ____________________
 John A.
Witham
 CFO
# C_2015073EN.01002701.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 — Aic v OHIM — ACV Manufacturing (Heat exchanger inserts)

(Case T-616/13) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a heat exchanger insert - Ground for invalidity - Lack of visibility of part of a complex product - Article 4(2) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2015/C 073/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aic S.A. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, Legal Adviser)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ACV Manufacturing (Seneffe, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2013 (Case R 293/2012-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between ACV Manufacturing and Aic S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finacial information extracted from the financial
statements listed on pages 17 and 18 of this Form 10-k and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060513
<NAME> PARAGON CORPORATE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,341
<SECURITIES>                                     3,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,265
<INVENTORY>                                     45,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,741
<PP&E>                                          30,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,154
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,459)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,656
<SALES>                                        248,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,668
<CGS>                                          158,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (164)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 10-5680.

#### Ronald A. Smith, Petitioner v. Michael Mahoney, Warden.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 461,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8123.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 978.
# C_2013129EN.01002501.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/25

---

Action brought on 4 March 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Baumarkt Praktiker Deutschland (PRO OUTDOOR)

(Case T-127/13)

2013/C 129/49

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Baumarkt Praktiker Deutschland GmbH (Hamburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 11 December 2012 in Case R 1900/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the action brought by the applicant, it confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community word mark No 4 782 215‘PRO OUTDOOR’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 11 December 2012 in Case R 1900/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the action brought by the applicant, it confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community word mark No 4 782 215‘PRO OUTDOOR’;

| — | order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PRO OUTDOOR’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 18, 22, 24, 25, 28 and 35

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Baumarkt Praktiker Deutschland GmbH.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark with word elements ‘OUTDOOR GARDEN BARBECUE CAMPING’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 18, 22, 24, 25 and 28

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009, and Rules 48 and 49 of Regulation No 2868/95 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009, and Rules 48 and 49 of Regulation No 2868/95

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
# C_2014194EN.01003802.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/38

---

Order of the General Court of 28 April 2014 — Deweerdt and Others v Court of Auditors

(Case T-132/13) (1)

1

2014/C 194/52

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
No. 09-11076.

#### Herbert Banks, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1103, 131 S. Ct. 814,

178 L. Ed. 2d 547,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9477.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 137, 178 L. Ed. 2d 83, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6449.
#### Roberto Hernandez et al., Appellants, v American Transit Insurance Company, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 362]

In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover on two unsatisfied judgments entered against the defendant’s insureds, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated June 10, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover on two unsatisfied judgments they obtained against the defendant’s insureds on default. In its answer, the defendant asserted that the judgments in the underlying action were void and unenforceable.

*585A valid, and enforceable judgment is a condition precedent to maintaining an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) *(see Braddy v Allcity Ins. Co.,*282 AD2d 637 [2001]). A judgment entered through fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct practiced on the court is a nullity and is subject to collateral attack *(see Sirota v Kloogman,*140 AD2d 426 [1988]; *Shaw v Shaw,*97 AD2d 403 [1983]). The evidence presented by the defendant in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs had a basis upon which to enter the judgments. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
No. 10-5126.

#### Robert Larson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 695,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9223.

178 L. Ed. 2d 525,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 245, 178 L. Ed. 2d 163, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6009.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00095-CV

NO. 03-08-00096-CV

Audrey Arlene Nesbitt, Appellant

v.

Peter Daniel Nesbitt, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 02-07628, HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Audrey Arlene Nesbitt attempted to appeal pro se two orders entered by

the county court at law on November 14, 2007, denying her motions for summary judgment. Both

of the orders are interlocutory and not appealable. See Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Keco R. & D., Inc.,

12 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex. 2005); DuPont Photomasks, Inc. v. Strayhorn, 219 S.W.3d 414, 418

(Tex. App.—Austin 2006, pet. denied). Without a final judgment or an otherwise appealable order,

we may not exercise appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014

(West Supp. 2007); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

On March 27, 2008, this Court requested that Nesbitt file a written response

demonstrating this Court’s jurisdiction over her appeals. Nesbitt filed a response on April 3, 2008,

but failed to demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss both of Nesbitt’s

appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
2

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: April 18, 2008
No. D-2583.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Perry S. Reich.

562 U.S. 1040, 131 S. Ct. 630,

178 L. Ed. 2d 458,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9014.

November 15, 2010.

Perry S. Reich, of Oakland Gardens, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

s0616 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

139031 

_________________________________________ 

In re DENZELL CHRISTIAN COVINGTON and 

NYANNA ANN-LISSETTE COVINGTON, 

Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 139031 

 COA: 291640 

Ingham CC Family Division: 

08-000381-NA; 08-000382-NA 

BERNARD A. COVINGTON, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.69 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.69 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.69 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.69 MB)
 
 DLA Land and Maritime news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Land and Maritime leader recognized for service to the blind 

/ Published Oct. 19, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
A Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime senior executive received an award for his efforts to create and sustain jobs for people who are blind. 

The National Association for the Employment of People who are Blind and National Industries for the Blind presented Acquisition Executive Milton Lewis with a plaque during a small ceremony Oct. 6 in the Operations Center at Defense Supply Center Columbus.

The Department of Defense Customer Appreciation Award recognizes employees within government agencies who demonstrate a commitment to promoting economic independence for the blind.

“I’m pleased to accept this award,” Lewis said. “But really what this represents is the amazing contributions of the entire team at Land and Maritime who work each day to support our programs that allow people with disabilities to work together.” 

Lewis was announced as the award winner Sept. 16 during the 2016 NIB/NAEPB National Conference and Expo in Arlington, VA. 

“This award is a reflection of the outstanding leadership at DLA Land and Maritime,” John Qua, senior vice president of operations for NIB said. 

“The commitment that your organization has made to providing jobs for people who are blind will greatly enhance their economic independence and allow them to live more fulfilling lives.” 

Earlier that day Lewis recognized a group of visually impaired contract closeout specialists during Land and Maritime’s 2016 AbilityOne recognition ceremony.  AbilityOne is a national network of more than 600 nonprofit agencies that employ more than 40,000 disabled people. 

The team of nine contract closeout specialists included six with varying degrees of blindness and during a three-year period they successfully closed more than 3,500 contracts.

The team members first came to Land and Maritime through a contract initiated with the AbilityOne program, and all six visually impaired members were ultimately hired permanently as full time DLA employees.  

In 2015, Land and Maritime committed more than $12 million to the AbilityOne program through employment contracts.
# Richmond quality assurance specialist named DLA Aviation’s December Employee of the Month

/ Published Feb. 1, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s December Employee of the Month (EOM) is Russ Garzon. He serves as a quality assurance specialist for DLA Aviation Engineering Directorate’s Value Engineering Team at Richmond, Virginia. DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day presented Garzon the award during a ceremony Jan. 28.

Dale Roberts is Garzon’s supervisor and nominated him for the December Employee of the Month Award. “Russ demonstrated superior performance, leadership and exemplary teamwork in defining and executing value engineering projects to improve acquisitions and reduce costs to DLA. His exceptional efforts are appreciated and recognized as a significant contributor in the branch’s quest to support DLA’s priorities,” said Roberts.  

In his write-up, Roberts stated Garzon took the initiative to work with Category IV reverse overhaul products source approval requests that companies were having difficulty qualifying as a new source.  He worked with suppliers who had high cost and delivery issues. Garzon supported a streamlined source approval process for qualifying a second source on a group of parts. Eight successful value engineering projects were completed during the month of December. This came on the heels of seven successful projects completed in November.

Roberts said since Garzon began working in Value Engineering, he has developed a total of 126 value engineering projects with savings of more than $5.8 million. 

Garzon said he is humbled by the recognition. “Given that I work in an organization already filled with eligible people who are truly exemplary, the recognition is an honor to receive. I enjoy the work I do, and being recognized for one's effort is always a welcome development and positive motivator, “ said Garzon.