alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1024

LINWOOD S. HASKINS, SR.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social Services, Division of 

Child Support Enforcement; COREY L. POINDEXTER, Assistant Attorney 

General III; TONY NELSON, District Manager - Central Virginia Office; 

STEPHANIE SMITH, Case Manager,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00456-DJN)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linwood Sylvester Haskins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Hensley, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1024 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Linwood Sylvester Haskins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Haskins v. Virginia, No. 

3:22-cv-00456-DJN (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2022). We also deny Haskins’ motion to appoint 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1024 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
J~~tEO srqT~

s 

2 z 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

~4TqC PROI,~~\ 

0 

Q(',T 1 ~' lv 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

William B. Mackie 

Acting Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Mackie: 

We received your letter dated September 30, 2010, requesting the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft re-certification memo the Carlsbad Field 

Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Argonne 

National Laboratory-East (ANL-E). We concur with CBFO's draft re-certification memo 

allowing ANL-E CCP to add to the previously-certified AERHDM waste stream approximately 

120 containers of remote-handled (RH) debris waste. 

In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on 

January 16, 2007, EPA approved the RH TRU waste characterization program at ANt; E(See 

EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-73). 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of RH TRU waste are 

appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft re-certification memo. The waste 

characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the ANL draft re-certification 

memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft re-certification memo 

for ANL-E CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Christine Gelles, DOE HQ 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO QA 

J.R. Stroble, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

Jonathan Edwards, EPA 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA 

Steve Zappe, NMED
No. 138, Original (R46-006).

#### State of South Carolina, Plaintiff v. State of North Carolina.

562 U.S. 1126, 131 S. Ct. 855,

178 L. Ed. 2d 586,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9830.

December 14, 2010.

The bill of complaint in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to this Court’s Rule 46.1.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 256, 130 S. Ct. 854, 175 L. Ed. 2d 713, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 765.
No. 10-5859.

#### Chris L. Turner, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1111, 131 S. Ct. 820,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9768.

178 L. Ed. 2d 561,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 468.
16:37 Tuesday, October 10, 2023 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, 

Unfair and Deceptive .Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

. ·. ;", . ) ,~\_ -~· -~~- -- --

,,_ ..... ~ 

DOT-OST-1995-272. 

formerly Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed ·by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
j 2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: June 28, 2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

~ e:=:::: ~--- ~~uel Podberesky -

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Vinh Q. Nguyen 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366.,9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 28th day of June, 2013, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.Sy Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
# C_2014031EN.01002201.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/22

---

Action brought on 12 November 2013 — ZZ v EMCDDA

(Case F-79/13)

2014/C 31/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi et M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request in order to state that a moral harassment was held by the superior and of the decision not renew the applicant’s contract and, as a consequence, the conduct of a new impartial investigation plus the compensation of the material and moral prejudices.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Director’s decision of 11th September 2012 rejecting the Applicant’s request; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Director’s decision of 11th September 2012 rejecting the Applicant’s request;

| — | annul the decision not to renew the Applicant’s contract dated 14th September 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision not to renew the Applicant’s contract dated 14th September 2012;

th

| — | annul the Chairman of the Management Board’s decision of 13th May 2013 and the Director’s decision of 25th June 2013, rejecting the Applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Chairman of the Management Board’s decision of 13th May 2013 and the Director’s decision of 25th June 2013, rejecting the Applicant’s complaint;

th

th

| — | as a consequence, to conduct a new regular, unbiased and impartial investigation; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, to conduct a new regular, unbiased and impartial investigation;

| — | compensate the material prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 430 202 euros; |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the material prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 430 202 euros;

| — | compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 120 000 euros; |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 120 000 euros;

| — | order the Defendant to pay for all costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Defendant to pay for all costs.

---
No. 10-5897.

#### Patrick H. Randle, Petitioner v. Howard Skolnik, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 474,

178 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8015.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 1047.
# Methods and Key Questions

# Literature

# Acronyms and Abbreviations
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.07 MB)
 
 Information Operations DLA
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.07 MB)
 
 Information Operations DLA
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.07 MB)
 
 Information Operations DLA
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.07 MB)
 
 Information Operations DLA
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Retired Judge Hodges

MISCHELLE BROWN-MAYO 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION

v. Record No. 1084-13-2 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 8, 2013 

COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Mischelle Brown-Mayo, pro se, on brief). 

 (David W. Robinson, Senior Assistant County Attorney, on brief), 

for appellee. 

 Mischelle Brown-Mayo (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission affirming the termination of an award of wage loss benefits on the ground that 

claimant’s current disability is unrelated to the compensable accident. Claimant contends the 

commission erred by (1) discounting the opinion of her treating physician, (2) giving “undue 

weight to the ‘objective findings,’” (3) concluding the record demonstrated she was receiving 

treatment for back pain shortly before her compensable accident, and (4) failing to “take into 

consideration” her testimony describing her symptoms and injury. 

 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Brown-Mayo v. Chesterfield Cnty., JCN VA00000218265 (May 23, 2013). We 

 

 Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant 

to Code § 17.1-400(D). 

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED 
- 2 - 

dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. May 21, 2004
    
    BY:
    
    /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSORocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerBY:
    
    /s/ MARK E. STEPHANMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
 End of Filing
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|                 |  |        |  |                                                  
|---------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|February 4, 2003 |  | By:    |  | /s/ WILLIAM R. WALKER                            
|                 |  |        |  |                                                  
|                 |  | Name:  |  | William R. Walker                                
|                 |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

35
DLA Energy contracting officers mentoring program
 
  By Grace Allen, Defense Department College Acquisition Internship Program management analyst
  The Defense Logistics Agency Energy Acquisition Workforce Development Division kicked off a new year of the Contracting Officer Mentoring Program at DLA McNamara Headquarters Complex on Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Jan. 17. For the past seven years, the program has built bonds between DLA Energy’s contracting officers using mentorship to support continual learning, leadership development and technical proficiency. In her opening remarks, Gabriella Earhardt, DLA Energy’s Head of the Contracting Activity, challenged the audience to make a firm decision about their goals instead of a hopeful statement. She stressed the value of prioritizing both personal and professional development reminding everyone that it is a daily decision to expand their knowledge, seize opportunities and advance their commitment to the mission. Over the next eight months, approximately 60 program participants will be offered seven seminars spanning topics such as The Nature of the Business, Back to the Basics of Contract Actions, Effective Facilitation of Team Collaboration, and more. A different special guest speaker will lead each seminar to offer a fresh perspective on how to the contracting officers can increase their mission effectiveness and efficiency. To improve collaboration and team building, participants are divided into five small groups and assigned a group leader. This year’s group leaders include Lou Morse, Alicia Jackson, Joy Massey, Lawrence Watson and Ryan Logan. They will be facilitating and documenting group discussions and attendance, as well as serving as the seminar emcees. Jackson, a contracting officer in DLA Energy Bulk Supply Chain Services, said her goal is to foster a positive learning experience. “The program provides an environment to communicate with our peers when you have questions or situations that you need to discuss,” she said. Keynote speaker at this year’s kick-off was Air Force Col. Michael Boswell, director of DLA Energy Customer Operations. His words instilled the importance of every aspect of a contracting officer’s job. “Just like the intricate workings of a finely tuned machine, every part is essential. Whether you're negotiating complex contracts, ensuring a steady supply of critical resources, or managing intricate logistics, your contribution is vital,” he said. Boswell shared the parable of the pencil, a story that draws parallelism between a pencil and a person leaving their mark on every surface they touch. The parable follows a pencil maker and their wise advice given to every pencil they make. Boswell emphasized the five things that refine and sharpen any person: mentorship, trials and tribulations, life lessons, substance, and perseverance. Boswell described the contracting officers as “quiet guardians of our nation” with “indispensable worth” challenging them to fully commit themselves to the Contracting Officer Mentorship Program.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2827 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2827

     To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem any 
  perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance used as a food contact 
substance to be unsafe and therefore treated as adulterated under such 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2019

 Mrs. Dingell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem any 
  perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance used as a food contact 
substance to be unsafe and therefore treated as adulterated under such 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Food Containers Safe from PFAS 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FOOD CONTACT SUBSTANCES CONTAINING 
              PERFLUOROALKYL AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES.

    Paragraph (6) of section 409(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348(h)(6)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(6)'' and inserting ``(6)(A) 
        Definition.--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) Perfluorinated Compounds.--
            ``(i) Deemed unsafe.--Beginning on January 1, 2022, any 
        PFAS used as a food contact substance is deemed to be unsafe 
        for the purposes of this section and the application of clause 
        (2)(C) of section 402(a).
            ``(ii) Definitions.--In this subparagraph:
                    ``(I) The term `PFAS' means a perfluoroalkyl 
                substance or a polyfluoroalkyl substance that is man-
                made with at least 1 fully fluorinated carbon atom.
                    ``(II) The term `perfluoroalkyl substance' means a 
                man-made chemical of which all of the carbon atoms are 
                fully fluorinated carbon atoms.
                    ``(III) The term `polyfluoroalkyl substance' means 
                a man-made chemical containing a mix of fully 
                fluorinated carbon atoms, partially fluorinated carbon 
                atoms, and nonfluorinated carbon atoms.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014421EN.01004001.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Larrañaga Otaño v OHIM (GRAPHENE)

(Case T-459/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GRAPHENE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 421/55

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Joseba Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián, Spain) and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián) (represented by: F. Bueno Salamero, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2013 (Case R 210/2013-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign GRAPHENE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Joseba Larrañaga Otaño and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Joseba Larrañaga Otaño and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

1

---