alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
R.H. DONNELLEY INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001065310
<NAME> R.H. DONNELLEY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,792
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,533
<PP&E>                                          60,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,150
<BONDS>                                        445,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   (234,682)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
No. 09-11225.

#### Christopher Ysais, Petitioner v. Bill Richardson, et al.

562 U.S. 1087, 131 S. Ct. 692,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9066.

178 L. Ed. 2d 522,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 163, 178 L. Ed. 2d 97, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6753.
No. 10-5036.

#### Maria Carmen Palazzo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 900, 131 S. Ct. 231,

178 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6232.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 445.
October 25, 2014

TO: US DOT Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection

FROM: Paul Hudson, President, Flyersrights.org

Membe r, FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (1993

- present)

Former Member, FAA/TSA Aviation Security Advisory Committee (1997

- 2007)

RE: Cell phone use on airliners

Flyersrights.org, the largest nonprofit airline passenger organization wi th over 45,000 members, strongly opposes the use of cell phone s for voice communications on airliners.

There is no doubt that airline passengers as well as flight crew members overwhelmingly oppose allowing passengers to have cell phone conversations i n the passenger cabin. The principal concern is invasion of privacy and annoyance by being forced to listen to often loud phone conversations of other passengers , but also includes concerns for security and safety.

The FCC No tice of Proposed Rulemaking that would allow air lines to decide this issue

clos ed i n May 2014 and received over 1,4 00 public comments, o f which 98% were in opposition. See FCC Docket 13

- 301.

Most of the commentators were long time travelers who have personally experience d the annoyance of cell phone conversations in other confined venues such as in trains, buses or in theatres, which generally ban or severely restrict the use of cell phones.

Air rage would be likely to increase, as shown by the assaults and even homicide s caused by cell phone use in theatres , even where prohibited . For example see www.cnn.com/2014/02/07/justice/florida

- movie

- theatre

- shooting/

There is also a possibilit y that terrorists could use cell phones to coordinate attacks, interfere with pilot and crew communications or trigger bombs on airliners.

P assengers are already permitted to have access to internet email using laptops and tablet

computers and could be allowed access to text messag ing and email on smart phones.

T here is no reason to extend this to cell phone voice conversations . This would inevitably be disturbing to other passengers and probably interfere with flight crew safety

instructions and commu nications. The only possible exception should be if an airline provides a privacy booth for cell phone call conversations that prevents any disturbance to other passengers.Accordingly, t he DOT and FAA regardless of FCC action should ban voice ce ll pho ne

calls o n airliners.

Contact Information

Addresses: 4411 Bee Ridge Rd. #274, Sarasota, Florida 34233 218 D Street SE, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20003

Phone: 800

- 662

- 1859 Hotline 877

- FLYERS6

Fax: 240

- 391

- 1923

Email: paul@flyersrights.org

Web site: www.flyersrights.org On Twitter: @flyersrights
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2444

To require the approval and implementation by the Secretary of Commerce

of a rule to provide a moratorium for a temporary period on the entry

of new vessels into certain groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries in

the North Pacific.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. GORTON (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To require the approval and implementation by the Secretary

of Commerce of a rule to provide a moratorium for

a temporary period on the entry of new vessels into

certain groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries in the

North Pacific.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Pacific Vessels

5 Entry Moratorium Act of 1994’’.
2

S 2444 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF MORATORIUM.

2 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

3 Secretary of Commerce shall, by not later than October

4 15, 1994, approve and implement the proposed rule to es5 tablish a moratorium for a temporary period on the entry

6 of new vessels into certain groundfish, crab, and halibut

7 fisheries in the North Pacific and Bering Sea published

8 on June 3, 1994 at 59 Federal Register 28827.

9 (b) The moratorium in subsection (a) shall remain

10 in effect until December 31, 1997, or until the Secretary

11 approves an amendment to such moratorium prepared by

12 the North Pacific Fishery Management Council in accord13 ance with the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Man14 agement Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), whichever is

15 earlier.

Æ
Treating inactive TB is the best 

way to protect you from developing 

active TB disease. When possible, 

CDC recommends using short and 

convenient 3- or 4-month 

rifamycin-based treatments for 

inactive TB.

Even people who received the TB vaccine, also called the 

bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, should be tested 

since the vaccine weakens over time.

Inactive Tuberculosis (TB) 

Testing & Treatment

Am I at risk for TB infection?

Talk to your healthcare provider about getting tested if you:

work in places with high risk for TB 

transmission, such as hospitals, 

homeless shelters, correctional 

facilities, and nursing homes

live or used to live in large 

group settings where TB is 

more common, such as 

homeless shelters, 

prisons, or jails

have a weaker immune 

system because of 

certain medications or 

health conditions such 

as diabetes, cancer, 

and HIV

recently spent time 

with someone who has 

active TB disease

were born in or 

frequently travel 

to countries where 

TB is common, 

including those in 

Asia, Africa, and 

Latin America

Think

Test Treat

What are my

treatment options? 

What TB test do

I need? 

Up to 13 million people in the United States may have inactive TB 

(also called latent TB infection). Without treatment, 1 in 10 people with 

inactive TB will get sick with active TB disease, and can spread TB to 

others through the air. You can help prevent the spread of TB.

To learn more about TB and how you can protect yourself and 

others, visit www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb

There are two types of tests for 

TB infection: the TB blood test 

and the TB skin test. TB blood 

tests are the preferred method 

of TB testing for people who have 

received the TB vaccine (BCG). 

Healthcare providers and patients 

should discuss which test is best.

1

2 3

301096
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 125 /Tuesday, June 30, 1998 / Notices 35645

obligation which the Secretary of the

Treasury is authorized to exercise,

make, or perform under the Acts

relating to the privatization of the

United States Enrichment Corporation.

2. This authority may be redelegated

in writing to an appropriate subordinate

official.

Robert E. Rubin,

Secretary of the Treasury.

[FR Doc. 98–17372 Filed 6–29–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–25–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Renegotiation Board Interest Rate;

Prompt Payment Interest Rate;

Contract Disputes Act

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt,

Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: For the period beginning July

1, 1998 and ending on December 31,

1998 the prompt payment interest rate

is 6% (6) per centum per annum.

DATES: This notice announces the

interest rate applicable for the July 1,

1998 to December 31, 1998 period.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may

be mailed to Sandra K. Jones, Team

Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office

of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of

the Public Debt, Parkersburg, West

Virginia, 26106–1328. A copy of this

Notice will be made available for

downloading from the http://

www.publicdebt.treas.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephanie Brown, Debt Accounting

Branch Manager, Office of Public Debt

Accounting, Bureau of the Public Debt,

Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106–1328,

(304) 480–5171, Sandra K. Jones, Team

Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office

of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of

the Public Debt, (304) 480–5174,

Edward C. Gronseth, Deputy Chief

Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel,

Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 480–

5192, or Brenda L. Hoffman, AttorneyAdviser, Office of the Chief Counsel,

Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 480–

5198.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Although

the Renegotiation Board is no longer in

existence, other Federal Agencies are

required to use interest rates computed

under the criteria established by the

Renegotiation Act of 1971 Sec. 2, Pub.

L. 92–41, 85 Stat. 97. For example, the

Contract Disputes Act of 1978 Sec. 12,

Pub. L. 95–563, 92 Stat. 2389 and the

Prompt Payment Act of 1982 Sec. 2,

Pub. L. 97–177, 96 Stat. 85 provide for

the calculation of interest due on claims

at a rate established by the Secretary of

the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C.

3902(a).

Therefore, notice is hereby given that,

pursuant to the above mentioned

sections, the Secretary of the Treasury

has determined that the rate of interest

applicable for the purpose of said

sections, for the period beginning July 1,

1998 and ending on December 31, 1998,

is 6 per centum per annum.

Dated: June 25, 1998.

Donald V. Hammond,

Acting Fiscal Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–17475 Filed 6–26–98; 12:56 pm]

BILLING CODE 4810–39–P
# C_2013336EN.01003203.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/32

---

Action brought on 23 September 2013 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-94/13)

2013/C 336/73

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: E. Marchal, J.-N. Louis, D. Abreu Caldas and A. Coolen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to calculate the accrual of pension rights acquired before entry into service on the basis of the new General Implementing Provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 30 January 2013 concerning the calculation of accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service with the Council, |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 30 January 2013 concerning the calculation of accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service with the Council,

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 June 2013 rejecting his complaint requesting application of the General Implementing Provisions and the actuarial rates in force at the time of his request to transfer his pension rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 June 2013 rejecting his complaint requesting application of the General Implementing Provisions and the actuarial rates in force at the time of his request to transfer his pension rights,

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-6075.

#### Gary R. Thompson, Petitioner v. Randy Workman, Warden.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 514,

178 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8599,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 858.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Einstein Lima, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 647]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered June 5, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Feldman, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress the complainant’s identification testimony. The complainant spontaneously identified the defendant when he inadvertently discovered a photograph of the defendant which had been left inside a police detective’s case folder, but had not been selected for inclusion in a photo array. This accidental viewing was not the product of any suggestive or improper police conduct *(see People v Curry,*287 AD2d 252 [2001]; *People v Nunez,*216 AD2d 494 [1995]; *People v Acosta,*181 AD2d 577 [1992]; *People v Casanova,*124 AD2d 813 [1986]). In any event, the evidence presented at the hearing established that the complainant was sufficiently familiar with the defendant that his photographic identification was merely confirmatory *(see People v Rodriguez,*79 NY2d 445 [1992]; *People v Reid,*300 AD2d 511 [2002]; *People v Livotti,*293 AD2d 490 [2002]; *People v Kemp,*255 AD2d 397 [1998]; *People v Mack,*218 AD2d 816 [1995]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2438

To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation

through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. SARBANES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment

Corporation through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OPIC Amendments

5 Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. RAISING CEILING ON INSURANCE.

7 Section 235(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

8 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(1)) is amended by striking

9 ‘‘$9,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000,000’’.
2

•S 2438 IS

1 SEC. 3. RAISING CEILING ON INVESTMENT GUARANTEES.

2 Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

3 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(2)) is amended—

4 (1) by striking subparagraph (B);

5 (2) by striking ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘GUARANTEES.—’’;

6 and

7 (3) by striking ‘‘$2,500,000,000’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘$5,000,000,000’’.

9 SEC. 4. EXTENDING ISSUING AUTHORITY.

10 Section 235(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

11 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(3)) is amended by striking

12 ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘1995’’.

13 SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

14 Section 235 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

15 (22 U.S.C. 2195) is amended by striking subsection (g).

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (8.9 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (8.9 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (8.9 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (8.9 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 10-7466.

#### Timothy L. Upshaw, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1153, 131 S. Ct. 944,

178 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 349.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
2017-0048.

#### Pryor v. Koukoutas.

In Habeas Corpus. Reported at 148 Ohio St.3d 1440, 2017-Ohio-1427, 72 N.E.3d 654. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
# DSCC celebrates opening of Mission Park

/ Published Oct. 8, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
#### In the Matter of Mandel Brock, Petitioner, v Martin Murphy et al., Respondents.

[57 NYS3d 896]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with an underlying criminal prosecution entitled *People v Brock,*pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 9543/ 16, and in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondents to dismiss the indictment, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d *708564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53*NY2d 12, 16 [1981]).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Eng, P.J., Roman, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
No. 10-643.

#### International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Lodge 1943, Petitioner v. AK Steel Corporation.

562 U.S. 1139, 131 S. Ct. 945,

178 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 495.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 706.