alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-438.

#### Charlene J. Good, et vir, Petitioners v. City of Sunbury, Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1091, 131 S. Ct. 796,

178 L. Ed. 2d 531,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9463.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 688.
Skip to Content

            - Home
            - Sections  - Money
- Environment
- World
- Science     & Technology
- Business     & Industry
- Health     & Public Welfare
-  -         Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change       Relating to Partnerships
                A Notice by the Securities       and Exchange Commission on                  02/25/2016

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice       of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to       Partnerships.
                photo by: Simon       Cunningham
Tuberculosis, ak nañinmijin TB, elab an kabobo im emaron kōmman mij. Kij ko an TB remaron mour 

iloan enbwinnim iomwin yiō ilo an ejellok kakōlkōl. Mennin jej nae etan nañinmij in TB eo ejab kabobo. 

Ilo an armij jab bōk wūno in kōmadmōd, TB eo ejab kabobo emaron erom nañinmijin TB eo ekabobo ilo 

jabdewōt ien im kōmman am nañinmij. Ilo ien an TB eo erom nañinmij eo ekabobo, emaron ajeeded jen 

armij ñan armij ilo mejatoto. Am bōke teej eo im wūno in kōmadmōd eo ñan TB eo ejab kabobo, 

emaron kejbarok kwe make, ro nukkum im ro mōttam, im armij ro ilo jukjukinbed eo am.

Lomnak Kwōbed ke ilo uwōta ñan am 

bōk nañinmijin TB?

Milien armij ro ilo Amedka ewōr aer TB eo ejab kabobo bōtab rejab jelā.

Jabdewōt armij emaron bōk TB, bōtab elablok uwōta ñan am bōk TB ñe kwōj: 

Ilo raan ko rej kab jemlok 

kwar bed iturin juon 

armij eo ewōr an 

nañinmijin TB eo 

ekabobo

kwar lotak ilo ak ekut am 

ito tak ñan aelon ko ekkā an 

wōr TB, ekoba aelon ko ilo 

Asia, Africa, im Latin 

America

emōjnolok an 

enbwinnier maron 

bōbrae jen nañinmij 

kin jet wūno ko rej 

bōki ak nañinmij ko 

einwōt tōñal, cancer, 

im HIV

kwōj jokwe ak kwōkujoñ jokwe ilo 

jikin ko elab armij rej jokwe ibben 

doon im elablok an ekkā an wōr 

TB, einwōt imōn kiki ko an armij 

ro ejellok imōn aer jokwe ak imōn 

kalbuj ko

jerbal ilo jikin ko elab uwōta ñan 

an ajeeded Tb, einwōt aujbitol 

ko, imōn kiki ko an ro ejellok 

imōn aer jokwe, imōn kalbuj ko, 

im imōn nōōjin ko

Etke ij aikuj teej

ñan nañinmijin Tuberculosis (TB) eo 

Ejab Kabobo? 

Kwōmaron bed ilo uwōta ñan am bōk TB jekdoñ emōj am bōke wā in TB eo (bar 

etannin wā in BCG) kinke ej mojnolok an lewaj kein bōbrae iomwin ien.
Teej Ewi wāween am teej ñan nañinmijin TB?

Ewōr ruo kain teej ko ñan nañinmijin TB. Kenono ibben taktō eo am kin 

teej ta eo emmontata ñan kwe.

Taktō eo am emaron rōjañ am 

bōk teej in bōtōktōk ñan TB 

kinke emaron kōmman ilo ien eo 

wōt, im elablok an alikar jemlok 

eo elañe emōj am kar bōk wā eo 

an TB moktalok. Teej eo ilo 

bōtōktōk ej joñe an jikin bōbrae 

eo an enbwinnim bōke kij eo ej 

kōmman TB.

Ñan teej eo ilo kil, ej jerbal juon 

nidōl jidikdik ñan likūt jet kobban 

teej eo ñan iloan kilim. Kwōnaj 

aikuj rool lok ñan taktō eo am 

iomwin 2-3 raan ñan lale elañe 

ewōr nañinmij eo ibbam.

Teej in 

Bōtōktōk an 

TB

Teej in Kil ñan 

TB

Kōmadmōd

Wūno in kōmadmōd nañinmijin TB eo ejab 

kabobo ej wāween eo emmontata ñan kejbarok 

kwe jen am bōk nañinmijin TB eo ekabobo. 

Kenono ibben taktō eo am kin wūno ko kwōj 

bōki im mennin jibañ ko ewōr ilo jukjukinbed 

eo.ñan jibañ kwe kin bebe in wūno in 

kōmadmōd eo am.

Injuran ko an kien im injuran ko armij rej make kollaiki remaron 

kollaiki wonnen teej im wūno in kōmadmōd nañinmijin TB.

Ta wūno in kōmadmōd ko?

Ñe ewōr am nañinmijin TB eo ejab kabobo, 

ewōr wūno in kōmadmōd ko iomwin ien kadu 

im rebidodo am bōki im remaron jibañ am jab 

nañinmij kin nañinmijin TB eo ekabobo.

Nan am bōk melele ko relablok kin TB im wāween am maron 

kejbarok kwe make im ro jet, lale www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb 

301129
# C_2015363EN.01000801.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2015 — Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-44/14) (1)

1

((Actions for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013 - Crossing of the external borders - Eurosur system - Development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis - Participation - Cooperation with Ireland and the United Kingdom - Validity))

(2015/C 363/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: D. Moore, S. Alonso de Leon and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Chavrier, F. Florindo Gijón, M.-M. Joséphidès and P. Plaza García, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, G. Hodge and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and G. Gilmore, Barrister), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: L. Christie, acting as Agent, and J. Holmes, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3) | Orders Ireland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders Ireland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 FOR AREMISSOFT CORPORATION AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                               2,084,000
<SECURITIES>                         2,760,000
<RECEIVABLES>                       16,195,000
<ALLOWANCES>                           639,000
<INVENTORY>                          1,090,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    25,919,000
<PP&E>                               2,155,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         615,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      31,293,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               14,251,000
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                14,000
<OTHER-SE>                           9,033,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        31,293,000
<SALES>                             29,854,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    29,854,000
<CGS>                                7,868,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       24,028,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     2,490,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     848,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      4,978,000
<INCOME-TAX>                         1,642,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  4,978,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                         2,533,000
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.28



</TABLE>
# PULASK I "•••"••'"•"•• " Dedicate d t o you rsucces s www.pulaskitech.ed u 

## DEPARTMEN TO F

RANSPORTATIO N ' CKh l OPERATION S OC T- U p 

### }:U 5 Septembe r28 , 201 0 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Docke t Operations , IVI-S O Wes t Buildin g groun d floo r Roo m W12-14 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE . Washington , D C 2059 0 SUBJECT : Reques t fo rextensio n o fexemption . Docke t Numbe rFAA-2002-1329 1 Dea rSi ro rMadam , I a m writin g i n respons e ofth e notic e tha t m yexemptio n fo rFA Atestin g wil l expir e Novembe r30 , 2010 . I trie d t o complet e thi s requiremen t on-lin e bu t coul d no t fin d th e correc t locatio n o n you rwe b site . I reques t tha t a n extensio n o fth e exemptio n b e approve d fo rm yorganization . Th e abilit yt o tes t student s upo n th e completio n o ftrainin g ha s greatl ybenefite d thei rabilit y t o succee d i n thei rpursui t ofFAAmechanic s certification . I n th e pas t a studen t ha d t o complet e 1 2 month s o ftrainin g befor e bein g evaluate d o n th e firs t 3 month s o ftha t training . Sinc e th e approva l o fthi s exemptio n th e completio n rat e ofou rcurriculu m ha s increased . Th e numbe ro fstudent s completin g th e entir e maintenanc e trainin g progra m ha s als o increased . Wit h th e implantatio n o fthi s exemptio n student s ar e mor e confiden t an d sel frelian t a s t o thei rabilit yt o succee d i n th e program . I t ha s benefite d thi s progra m immensely . I hop e t o hav e ou rexemptio n extende d anothe ryears , an yquestions . Sincerely , Pleas e contac t m e i fyo u hav e

Steve n L . Hotle , Directo r Pulask i Technica l Colleg e - Aviatio n Technolog yCente r PH : (501)835-542 0

i6o o Wes t Marylan d Avenu e Aviatio n Maintenanc e Technolog yCente r Nort h littl e Rock , A R 7212 0 Phon e 501-855-542 0 Fa x501-854-785 9C2 : (/ > 3 > M 2 3 c •? ! • < c r K g 3 r j ( D 3 U l •0.2 ' t o ^ i n = 1 5 5 ° 3 W3 !? ;

O (I * =? 3 =-8 ' O 2 o

• g = §

•3 ^ c:;' <

- r 3"- D m( B - < ( D u o

B > o (f i < s r* O 3 3 J S D C S m S W ^ n « •<

D < S . O' O 7 3

( D C

• 3 O l O > o < ( n ( D o c C O m 

### 8 ^ a!

—- o ° 1 o 3 ! ** * " n • a o o c n O

5 ' 3 -r - ^ 0 1 CD D) a . • < 2<L g 3 O 2 . ( Q O S . TM 2 . o ' 3 O 3 (I ) S . Q . S"< ' 5J . C O 5! " • < 3 0 > O ^ | | o 

# I! " m3 . £2 . cc 3 ' 3 ( O ^ 

## ^ ° ( D c O ^ O ( D 0.- ° <5 . n> " * ^

9 ( D = * 5 ^ c

T 3 < P« • ^

» S 3 c 

### 5! » 

### S I C - , O 3 (D O O Q . (A= ; r o . , " •S . N » ( B C D c/ ) t o X a . < D ^ ( D O ". - 3

- •< " S : ? • g TlS ° e n m O

e n X ( u = L , ( B S 3 0 1 (u"S . o ' o ^ 3 S Z 2 i o r o

. o 

### 2 3 r j O ) O

— h o 3 o T l 3 3 > 7 3 0 3 C D 

### a 

## f l "

"~ » S • * " 0 2 

### i f f

### § = ^ 0. 3 2 . a - -*5ra>. a ^ B ' 5 " ( D I Q S 

# I ( D (A 5 * 3 " < Q O 

### s
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7917

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus RICHARD HARRY ROBERTSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-02-19; CA-04-121) Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Harry Robertson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* In the same order, we denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Robertson’s appeal with respect to his remaining claim that his sentence violated United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard Harry Robertson, Jr., appealed the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and we granted a certificate of appealability on Robertson’s claim that his counsel was ineffective by failing to appeal his conviction despite Robertson’s request that he do so. * For the reasons that follow, we vacate the district court’s order as to Robertson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim and remand for further proceedings. Unless the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the district court shall hold a prompt hearing to determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the movant’s claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A hearing is required when a movant presents a colorable Sixth Amendment claim showing disputed material facts and a credibility determination is necessary to resolve the issue. See United States v. Witherspoon , 231 F.3d 923, 925-27 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Peak , 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993). In its informal brief to this court, the Government concedes “that the record before the district court raised a- 3 - genuine issue of material fact as to whether trial counsel’s performance was per se ineffective under Peak . Accordingly, the district court’s summary dismissal of this claim without resolving the dispute was in error.” We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order as to Robertson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim and remand that claim for further proceedings. We grant Robertson leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Form Approved 

OMB No. 0920-0338 

Exp. 01/31/2026

Recommended Smokeless Tobacco Ingredient Reporting Format - CSTHEA 

Please attach additional pages if necessary 

Date 

Office on Smoking and Health 

Attn. FCLAA Program Manager 

4770 Buford Hwy., NE, MS S107-7 

Atlanta, GA 30341 

This ingredient report is being submitted pursuant to the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Health 

Education Act (CSTHEA), 15 U.S.C. §4403(a). 

Company Name(s)* 

Brand(s)† 

Product category(ies)† (check all that apply) 

______Dry snuff 

______Moist (wet) snuff 

______Snuff portion pouch 

______Snus 

______Snus portion pouch 

______Plug 

______Twist 

______Loose leaf 

______Compressed (pellet, tablet) 

______Other (specify) 

*If this Ingredient Report is submitted by a designated individual or entity on behalf of a smokeless tobacco product

manufacturer, packager, or importer, the form must specify on whose behalf the submission is being made.

†Inclusion of the brand name and product type for ingredients is not required under CSTHEA.

Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 6.5 hours per response, including the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing 

the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of 

information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any 

other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 

1600 Clifton Road, MS-74, Atlanta, GA 30333, ATTN: PRA (0920-0338). 
 

 

 

Form Approved 

OMB No. 0920-0338 

Exp. 01/31/2026

Ingredient Name¶ 

¶ 

CAS Registry Number§ 

Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 6.5 hours per response, including the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing 

the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of 

information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any 

other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 

1600 Clifton Road, MS-74, Atlanta, GA 30333, ATTN: PRA (0920-0338).
No. 10-7736.

#### Terrence Little, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 963,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 219.

178 L. Ed. 2d 793,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-6637.

#### Jaime Vasquez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 537,

178 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8377.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 526.
No. 10-6710.

#### Jose Torrez, Petitioner v. Kenneth McKee, Warden.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 660,

178 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9373.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2014024EN.01003202.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/32

---

Action brought on 21 November 2013 — Alma — The Soul of Italian Wine v OHIM — Miguel Torres (SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE)

(Case T-605/13)

2014/C 24/59

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alma — The Soul of Italian Wine LLLP (Bal Harbor, United States) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 18/2013-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 18/2013-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE’ — Community trade mark application No 9 784 539

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registrations Nos 462 523, 6 373 971 and Spanish trade mark registrations Nos 152 231, 715 524, 2 796 505

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal and rejected the CTM application in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2691 

To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency for International 

Development to prescribe the manner in which programs of the agency 

are identified overseas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. MCCAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency 

for International Development to prescribe the manner 

in which programs of the agency are identified overseas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USAID Branding 

5 Modernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR BRANDING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the United 

8 States Agency for International Development (USAID) is 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2691 IH

1 authorized to prescribe, as appropriate, the use of logos 

2 or other insignia of the USAID Identity, or the use of 

3 additional or substitute markings including the United 

4 States flag, to appropriately identify, including as required 

5 by section 641 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

6 U.S.C. 2401), overseas programs administered by the 

7 Agency. 

8 (b) AUDIT.—Not later than one year after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the 

10 United States Agency for International Development shall 

11 submit to Congress an audit of compliance with relevant 

12 branding and marketing requirements of the Agency by 

13 implementing partners funded by the USAID, including 

14 any requirements prescribed pursuant to the authorization 

15 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW138133]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

June 18, 1998.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW138133 for lands in Campbell County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination. The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for 
rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, 
per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW138133 effective February 1, 1998, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 98-17654 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
No. 10-5960.

#### Thomas F. Campanile, Jr., Petitioner v. Phyllis Campanile Nicolella, as Executor of the Estate of Carolyn H. Renzi, Deceased.

562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 420,

178 L. Ed. 2d 328,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8153,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 67 App. Div. 3d 1078, 888 N.Y.S.2d 270.