alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Filed 4/29/13 P. v. Caddy CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Colusa)

----

THE PEOPL E,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CAROL SUE CADDY,

Defendant and Appellant. C071604

(Super. Ct. No. CR53431)

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

Having reviewed the record as required by Wende , we affirm the judgment.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

On September 19, 2011, defendant Carol Sue Caddy entered a drugstore and

claimed she needed to pick up a prescription, giving a false name and date of birth.

While an employee searched for the prescription, defendant went behind the counter and

put her ha nd in her purse. She held something that poked the end of the purse, suggesting2

a gun. Defendant threatened to shoot the employee and demanded certain drugs. The

employee gave the drugs to defendant, who thereafter left the store.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty to second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211)

and was released to a rehabilitation program pending sentencing. Defendant waived

credit for time spent in the rehabilitation program. The court sentenced defendant to state

prison for the midte rm of three years.

Defendant appeals. She did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (Pen. Code,

§ 1237.5.)

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and reques ts this court to review the record and

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende, supra,

25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have

elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken

an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a

disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISP OSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MURRAY , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

DUARTE , J.
#### Lischner v. Lischner

05/03/2016

14 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 666
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State of Connecticut and

The Connecticut Resources

Recovery Authority

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order 81168

Modification No.2

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and The Connecticut

Resources Recovery Authority('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in

Trading Agreement and Order 81168 and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual

agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(1) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May 1,2010.

2. Any references to October 1

51 with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (DERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September 1, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order 81168 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall

comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-22(d)(2)(A) of

the Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order 81168, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106 - 5127

http://www.cLgov/dcp

All Equal Opportunity Employer
The Connecticut Resources

Recovery Authority

2 Trading Agreement and Order 8116B

Modification No.2

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

The Connecticut Reso~;/s ~/-Authority

Signature: ~YI -~c

Name: /fir ChU/ /;-'( cf() c

Titie: _--=/)=--'-Ir_e_L_-It--=ov'------'ot"'-----_Of-+-_~__="r'_--{;_/o_'-'_..I>__

Date: __-tr/'--7-/-,h--"O"-'Q'--- _

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

Ga~ IRostJ

Diredor

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

04 - 2f'- 2<ro'l

Date

~:.. ;.
No. 10-277.

#### Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner v. Betty Dukes, et al.

562 U.S. 1091, 131 S. Ct. 795,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9588.

178 L. Ed. 2d 530,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question I presented by the petition. In addition to Question I, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the class certification ordered under Rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with Rule 23(a).”

Same case below, 603 F.3d 571.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[R-0654]


Notice of Intent

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.2(c), notice is hereby given that the 
Bureau of Land Management proposes to amend the Eastern San Diego 
County Management Framework Plan (MFP) to facilitate the sale of public 
land. The proposed amendment will change the Multiple Use 
Classification (MUC) from Limited (L) to Moderate (M) for the following 
public land:

San Bernardino Meridian, San Diego County, California,
    Township 13 South, Range 4 East, Section 9, S\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/
4\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, containing 40 acres, more or less.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: According to the MFP, the sale of public 
land is allowed only in MUC M or unclassified lands. The above-
described land, currently leased to the County of San Diego for the 
Julian Solid Waste Transfer Station is classified MUC L. The land is 
being considered for conveyance to the County of San Diego under the 
provisions of the Recreation and Public Purposes Act of June 14, 1926, 
as amended (43 U.S.C. 869, et seq.) for continued use as a solid waste 
transfer station. The proposed plan amendment and decision on disposal 
will be determined through an environmental assessment in accordance 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and CFR 1610.5-5.

DATES: Written comments on this plan amendment will be accepted on or 
before July 13, 1998. Please address comments to Terry A. Reed, Field 
Manager, Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office, 1661 South 
4th Street, El Centro, CA 92243-4561.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Self, Realty Specialist, at the 
above address, or telephone (760) 337-4426.

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
Thomas F. Zale,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-15649 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10015

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER GOINS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-25-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Goins

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Goins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10015 Document: 00513804938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-10015

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10015 Document: 00513804938 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Iemrahn Hassen, Chief Financial Officer of Anooraq Resources
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | September
      30, 2008 | 
|------ | ------------------------ | 
|       |                          | 
|       |                          | 
|       | /s/ Iemrahn Hassen       | 
|By:    | Iemrahn Hassen           | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer  | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
No. 09-11234.

#### Angel Mazariegos, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 818,

178 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9805.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 67.
#### Com. v. Yingling 48

08/04/2016

279-281 MAL (2016)

48

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 207
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE)








For Healthcare Providers										Related Pages
										Clinical Evaluation and DiseaseTreatment & PreventionDiagnostic TestingVaccine
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  January 26, 2023						Source: 	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Vector-Borne Diseases (DVBD)
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeTick-borne encephalitis (TBE) Home
Prevention
Transmission
Geographic Distribution
For Healthcare Providersplus icon
Clinical Evaluation & Disease
Diagnostic Testing
Treatment & Prevention
Vaccine
Symptoms, Diagnosis, & Treatment
Vaccine
Links & References


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of the
period ending January 1, 2000 for Grove Worldwide LLC and subsidiaries, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          14,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,457)
<INVENTORY>                                    208,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,685
<PP&E>                                         270,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                (65,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 846,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,651
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   846,826
<SALES>                                        383,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               383,022
<CGS>                                          317,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  317,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          302
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,936)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 10-6830.

#### Delbert Lee Burkett, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 801,

178 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9511.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 351.
No. 10-5435.

#### Lin Xian Wu, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 296,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7109.

178 L. Ed. 2d 194,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.20 - ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Addendum (the "Addendum") is made effective  as of the 12th day of
December,  2001 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and  Stephen  A.  Milne
effective as of December 16, 1997.

         WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in  the best interest of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  has   previously
considered  and agreed to extend  the term of the  Agreement  from its  original
term; and

         WHEREAS, the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  at its meeting of
December  11, 2001 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

          1. Paragraph 1 of  the  Agreement  with  respect to the Term is hereby
          amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2005.

          2. All other  terms and  conditions  of the  Agreement  remain in full
          force and effect.


ATTEST:                                 ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/  Jan R. Van Gorder                  By: /s/  F. William Hirt
     Jan R. Van Gorder                           F. William Hirt
     Secretary                                   Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/  Sheila M. Hirsch                       /s/  Stephen A. Milne
     Sheila M. Hirsch                            Stephen A. Milne
     Executive Secretary                         6200 Kuhl Road
                                                 Fairview, PA   16415



                                       35
No. 10-5442.

#### Clarence Shamein Fitzgerald, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7270.

178 L. Ed. 2d 195,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 935.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN HUGUE DANIEL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 2120

[ January 13, 2016 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jack Schramm Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF000382A

.

Richard W. Springer of Richard W. Springer, P.A., Palm Springs, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. State v. Green

, 944 So. 2d 208, 217

– 18 (Fla. 2006); Bee v.

State

, 132 So. 3d 857, 857 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

W ARNER
, G ROSS and M AY
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2014395EN.01004702.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — Molda v Commission

(Case T-629/13) (1)

((Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures presented by Germany - Clause relating to extremely difficult cases - Freedom to a professional activity and to conduct a business - Right to property - Proportionality))

(2014/C 395/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Molda AG (Dahlenburg, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke, M. Y. Vollmer, C. Telschow and A. Schulze, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/448/EU of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2013 L 240, p. 27) in so far as Article 1(1) thereof rejects granting the applicant the supplementary quotas requested for the third trading period of the 2013 to 2020 emissions trading on the basis of the hardship clause under Paragraph 9(5) of the Treibhausgas-Emissionshandelsgesetz (German Law on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading) of 21 July 2011.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Molda AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Molda AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

---