alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 1, 2014

s0325

Order 

Clerk

April 1, 2014

148576

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148576

COA: 318777

Wayne CC: 13-001653-FC

CYNTHIA ILENE FLEMING,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 10-7330.

#### Steve Hein, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1095, 131 S. Ct. 806,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9508.

178 L. Ed. 2d 539,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 652.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lance Owens, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 736]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J. at hearing; Eduardo Padró, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered January 25, 2013, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The hearing record and our examination of a copy of a photo array support the court’s finding that the array was not unduly suggestive *(see People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). The alleged discrepancies in skin tone and facial hair between defendant and the fillers were not noticeable *(see e.g. People v Sanchez,*95 AD3d 241, 250 [1st Dept 2012], *affd*21 NY3d 216 [2013]), and the fact that defendant was depicted wearing a very common article of clothing that was briefly referred to in the identifying witness’s description did not call attention to defendant *(see e.g. People v Drayton,*70 AD3d 595 [1st Dept 2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 749 [2010]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Richter, Feinman and Webber, JJ.
# C_2014142EN.01005501.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/55

---

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2014 — Triarii v Commission

(Case T-435/13) (1)

1

2014/C 142/71

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.

1

---
No. 10-5138.

#### Julio Cartagena, aka Jose Mejia, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 247,

178 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6834.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 104.
EXHIBIT 10.5(A)

                                     WAIVER

Whereas, the undersigned parties entered into that certain Securities Purchase
Agreement (the "Agreement") for the purchase of 500,000 shares of the Company's
common stock;

Whereas, Section 2.3 of the Agreement provides that the Closing is contingent on
Purchaser (as defined in the Agreement) introducing to LensCard Corporation
potential investors ("Investors"); and (ii) such Investors, and/or one or more
investment funds controlled by or affiliated with Purchaser, purchase a minimum
of $1,500,000 of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per
share before February 1, 2004;

Whereas, the parties wish to waive such closing contingencies and to authorize
the closing the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Agreement.

THEREFORE, the undersigned parties agree as follows:

The undersigned parties hereby waive all closing contingencies set forth in
Section 2.3 of the Agreement and authorize the closing of the purchase of the
common stock pursuant to the Agreement.

Bristol Capital, LLC

By: /s/ Paul Kessler
--------------------------------
Name: Paul Kessler
Title: Member

LensCard Corporation

By:  _____________________________
Name:
Title:
# DLA Aviation employee featured in latest 'Acquisition Professionals' video

/ Published March 30, 2016

[This is the sixth in a series of videos profiling Defense Logistics Agency acquisition professionals.]
A key message in the video is the relationships built as an acquisition professional.
The acquisition videos were created to increase recognition of the importance of education in the DLA acquisition community and to highlight the diversity in the 14 areas of the community.

To view the video, visit DLA’s YouTube page or Facebook page.
No. 10-6262.

#### William McMillon, Petitioner v. Malcolm Culley, Superintendent, Livingston Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 426,

178 L. Ed. 2d 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8258.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 63.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GLENN C. VINYARD JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-19-00169-CR

Appeal from the

142nd District Court

of Midland County, Texas 

(TC# CR50477) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in a portion 

of the trial court’s judgment. We therefore modify the trial court’s judgment to include the 

following language:

“Court costs recoverable from Defendant under the terms of this judgment shall not include 

costs for the preparation of the reporter’s record, since Defendant was indigent at or near the time 

of conviction. Furthermore, per the Eastland Court of Appeals’ decision in King v. State, No. 11-

17-00179-CR, 2019 WL 3023513, at *5 (Tex.App. – Eastland July 11, 2019, pet. filed) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication), any time payment fee may only be constitutionally enforced 

against Defendant up to the amount of $2.50, absent any further decision from the Texas Court of 
2

Criminal Appeals to the contrary.”

We therefore modify the trial court’s judgment to include the above-referenced language, 

and affirm the judgment of the court below, as modified. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
# Gifts, games highlight of annual children’s holiday party

/ Published Dec. 14, 2015
PHILADELPHIA, 

Games of musical chairs, “pin the carrot on the snowman” and other activities filled the classrooms of Benjamin Franklin Elementary School children during Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s annual children’s holiday party Dec. 10.    

More than 200 kindergarteners and first-graders participated in arts and crafts, games and received gifts donated by DLA Troop Support employees. 

Employee volunteers led the party activities in addition to collecting, wrapping and transporting approximately 600 character-themed presents based on each student’s respective gift “wish.”

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton stopped by the party to greet the students and thank employee volunteers and school staff.

“I’m so glad I had the opportunity to participate in one of our largest community relations events...the annual Children’s Holiday Party,” Hamilton said. “Simply put, I was overwhelmed at the generosity and spirit of volunteerism put forth by this great workforce.”

Seeing the excitement of the children during the party makes the months of planning worth it, Community Relations Coordinator Janeen Hayes said. 

“We really had fun celebrating with you today,” Hayes told a group of children during the party. “We hope you enjoyed yourselves and have an awesome holiday.”
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2746 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2746

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2019

  Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Schrader, and Mr. 
    Yoho) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment 
Program Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        under section 1415A of the National Agricultural Research, 
        Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or 
        under any other State loan repayment or loan forgiveness 
        program that is intended to provide for increased access to 
        veterinary services in such State.''; and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-9029.

#### Ryan Cedeno, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1079, 131 S. Ct. 634,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9101.

178 L. Ed. 2d 509,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*510Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 321.
1

DATE: June 4, 2009
SUBJECT: 2008 Ozone Conformity NPRM

Pre
- proposal Meetings with External Stakeholder Organizations The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Transportation and Air Quality transportation staff
- level conformity te am members met with the following external stakeholder organizations to discuss the 2008 ozone conformity NPRM and to provide a status update on the 2006 PM Amendments NPRM: Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)

– March 16, 2009 National Association of Regiona l Councils (NARC)

– March 24, 2009 American Public Transportation Association (APTA)

– March 24, 2009 Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO)

– March 25, 2009 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)

– M arch 25, 2009 National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA)

– March 30, 2009 Agenda for each meeting: 1. Purpose of Call ; 2. Background for 2008 ozone NAAQS : a. March 12, 2008

– EPA issued final rule on ground
- level ozone NAAQS ; b. Transportation conformity for the 2008 ozone NAAQS would apply one year after effective date of EPA’s final nonattainment designations. 3. Potential issues covered by this rulemaking: a. Provide transportation conformity requirements for areas designated nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. These proposed changes include the use of regional conformity tests in 2008 ozone areas, the use of ozone budgets for other ozone NAAQS, and defining the baseline year; b. Reorganize certain sections of the conformity rule to minimize future rulemakings needed when new or revised NAAQS are issued. We are considering revisions to 40 CFR 93.109 and 93.119 of the conformity rule, so that these provisions would apply to areas designated for new or revised NAAQS in the future. 4. Discussion of rulemaking issues ; 5. Status of conformity rulema king for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS areas.2

Rulemaking issues discussed (staff
- level ideas considered for proposal) : 1. Proposal to restructure 40 CFR 93.109 to apply generally to all areas designated for a new or revised NAAQS, rather th an for each specific NAAQS/pollutant ; 2. Proposal to generalize baseline years in the baseline year interim emissions test (40 CFR 93.119) for conformity purposes for any NAAQS/pollutant; 3. Proposal to make required analysis years the same, regardless of whethe r an area has an adequate or approved SIP budget or must use the interim emissions test(s); 4. Use of interim emissions tests in 2008 ozone areas in lieu of older ozone SIP budgets.
# EEO offers training, tips for returning to the office

/ Published Dec. 13, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s note: This is part of a series of articles aiming to help Defense Logistics Agency employees return to the office in January. The articles will address several areas, providing tips and information to ease the transition.*

Returning to the office more frequently is a change of pace for some, but there are resources available to make this change easier for the individual, as well as topics to keep in mind to make things more comfortable for everyone in the office.

“When reconnecting with people, remember we’ve all experienced a social deficit with our colleagues, in-person interactions and socializing. Therefore, we need to be intentional and establish new routines for ourselves and be mindful of our behaviors and conduct,” said Janice Samuel, director of the Defense Logistics Agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity and Inclusion Office.

“Create positive energy and identify changes that make returning to the office a pleasant transition. The tone of your conversations is the key to better communication, and remember common courtesy and decency,” she added.

As more people return to the office, EEO will hold in-person training sessions on topics including prevention of sexual harassment and civil treatment.   

“During these in-person trainings, there will be interactive presentations to allow open and honest conversations. We’ll provide examples, scenarios and discussions of real-life issues and concerns,” Samuel said.

EEO will accommodate additional training requests as well, she added.

Employees also should remember when returning to the office that fragranced plug-in devices and candles are fire hazards and are not allowed in the workplace, she said. Small appliances such as coffee machines and tea kettles should be kept in common kitchen areas.

A reasonable accommodation request for an ergonomic assessment should be made through a supervisor and will be coordinated with the disability program coordinator. Employees can request a reasonable accommodation for items ranging from technology to other items, she added.

If employees feel overwhelmed or anxious, Samuel said they can talk to their supervisor, who can assist in providing the proper guidance and points of contact if needed.

“Communication is key, and meeting with your supervisor to address your concerns is the first step,” she said.

Employees who have anxiety about returning to the office or are facing other issues are encouraged to use DLA’s Employee Assistance Program, she said. EAP offers connections to personal services and counseling on topics including mental health, financial and legal assistance, alcohol or drug abuse, work-related stresses, and marriage and family caregiving issues. The service is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, every day of the year.
## PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. PMB 50 Pala, CA 92059

Ph: (760) 891-3500 Fax: (760) 742-1411 October 6, 2009 Ms. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Dear Ms. Yoshii: Pursuantto your letter ofSeptember 9th concerning the area designation process for meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead, the Pala Band ofMission Indians is herein requesting that the Pala Indian Reservation be designated "unclassified." This request is in conformance with Section 107 (d) ofthe Clean Air Act. The basis for the recommendation of "unclassified" is as follows: 1. No data on lead is available from air monitoring samples taken onthe Pala Reservation. The Air Pollution Control District ofSanDiego County did monitor for lead many years ago in areas near to the City ofSan Diego. Even then the amounts oflead detected were miniscule and demonstrated a pattern ofdiminishing from that level over time. The APC District has not sampled for lead for a very long time because ofthe lack ofindicated need to do so. 2. The population ofthe Reservation is very small and scattered over a large area. Population density is light. We are located in the north end ofSan Diego County and approximately 30 miles from the metropolitan area ofthe City ofSan Diego. That coupled with the total lack ofany recognized industrial source oflead pollution makes it very unlikely that there is any level oflead in excess ofthe new standard. Thank you for your consideration ofour recommendation. The ''unclassified'' status ofthe Reservation would be the appropriate designation. Your support ofthat designation would be greatly appreciated.

cc: Colleen McKaughan
No. 10-6365.

#### Juvenal Vega-Soto, Frank Reyes, and Martin Reyes, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 493,

178 L. Ed. 2d 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7899.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 685.
# C_2014015EN.01002101.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/21

---

Action brought on 22 October 2013 — ZZ and Others v Court of Auditors

(Case F-105/13)

2014/C 15/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 13 December 2013 not to refer the matter to the Court of Justice in order to request it to examine whether Ms S., at that time a Member of the Court of Auditors, no longer fulfilled the requisite conditions or met the obligations arising from her office and not to rule on the complaints of the applicants, not to take any measures which may publicly recognise the harassment that they have sustained, their suffering and to take steps to restore their good names, their credibility and dignity and to compensate the material and non-material damage suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Court of Auditors of 13 December 2013, acting as appointing authority, not to rule on the complaints of the applicants, not to take any measures which may publicly recognise the harassment that they have sustained, their suffering and to take steps to restore their good names, their credibility and dignity and to compensate the material and non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Court of Auditors of 13 December 2013, acting as appointing authority, not to rule on the complaints of the applicants, not to take any measures which may publicly recognise the harassment that they have sustained, their suffering and to take steps to restore their good names, their credibility and dignity and to compensate the material and non-material damage suffered;

| — | Order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs.

---
EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Frank A. Fariello and Marvin
D. Genzer, and each of them, with full power of substitution, the undersigned's
true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute in his name and on his behalf,
in any and all capabilities, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EDO Corporation
(the "Company"), a New York corporation, for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999, and any and all other instruments which such attorneys and agents, or
either of them, deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply
with the annual reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms as his
own act and deed all that such attorneys and agents, and each of them, shall do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Either of such attorneys and agents shall
have, and may exercise, all of the powers hereby conferred.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed their signatures this 25th
day of February, 2000.

     Robert E. Allen
     Robert Alvine
     Mellon C. Baird
     George M. Ball
     Frank A. Fariello
     William J. Frost
     Marvin D. Genzer
     Robert M. Hanisee
     Michael J. Hegarty
     Ira Kaplan
     James M. Smith
     George A. Strutz, Jr.
No. 09-10903.

#### In re Debora Townsend, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 119,

178 L. Ed. 2d 259,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7674,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# C_2013291EN.01000701.xml

| 5.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/7

---

Action brought on 11th July 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-22/13)

2013/C 291/07

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Pecyna, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision refusing the recruitment of the Applicant considering that he does not fulfill the eligibility criteria set in the EPSO/AD/207/11 competition notice.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Unit B.2 in Directorate — General Human Resources and Security of the European Commission dated 26 September 2012 which refused his recruitment at the Commission (ESTAT) from the reserve list of competition EPSO/AD/207/11 and adding a comment in the reserve list of that competition informing the Commission's departments that the applicant did not meet the conditions of eligibility for that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Unit B.2 in Directorate — General Human Resources and Security of the European Commission dated 26 September 2012 which refused his recruitment at the Commission (ESTAT) from the reserve list of competition EPSO/AD/207/11 and adding a comment in the reserve list of that competition informing the Commission's departments that the applicant did not meet the conditions of eligibility for that competition;

| — | if necessary, annul the decision of the Director of DG HR.D.2 of the European Commission rejecting the complaint lodged by ZZ (No. Rl696/12) dated 25 February 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, annul the decision of the Director of DG HR.D.2 of the European Commission rejecting the complaint lodged by ZZ (No. Rl696/12) dated 25 February 2013;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---