alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

(a) Certification by President of Quarterly Report

                        CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Robert B. Kay, President of Key Components, LLC and Key Components Finance
Corp. (collectively, the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004


/s/ Robert B. Kay
-----------------
Robert B. Kay
President



<PAGE>



(b) Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report

                        CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, Keith A. McGowan, Chief Financial Officer of Key Components, LLC and Key
Components Finance Corp. (collectively, the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004

/s/ Keith A. McGowan
-----------------------
Keith A. McGowan
Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-510.

#### Odis L. Tabor, Petitioner v. Freightliner of Cleveland, LLC.

562 U.S. 1136, 131 S. Ct. 909,

178 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 369.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 321.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED December 31,
1998.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                            5280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6031
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      10000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                       (6104)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6301
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1180)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.000)

        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Michael D. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Michael D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Nicholas D. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Michael D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[54 NYS3d 299)

Appeal by the father from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Caren Loguercio, J.), dated November 12, 2015. The order of fact-finding and disposition, insofar as appealed from, upon a decision of that court dated October 9, 2015, made after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, found that the father neglected the subject children. The notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a notice of appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition *(see*CPLR 5512 [a]).

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

After a fact-finding hearing in this neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Family Court found that the father neglected the subject children by misusing drugs and alcohol. The father appeals.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court’s finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [B]; 1046 [a] [iii]). The evidence of his repeated misuse of drugs and alcohol adduced at the fact-finding hearing established a prima facie case of neglect, and therefore neither actual impairment of the children’s physical, mental, or emotional condition, nor a specific risk of impairment, needed to be established *(see Matter of Audrey K. [Erik K.],*108 AD3d 717 [2013]; *Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.],*81 AD3d 647 [2011]; *Matter of Paolo W.,*56 AD3d 966 [2008]).

Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that the father neglected the children.

Leventhal, J.P., Barros, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
VI

★(Star Print)

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2409

For the relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of

Grand Rapids, Minnesota.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 19 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. DURENBERGER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul

Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay,

4 out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appro5 priated, the sum of $3,391,404.50 jointly to D.W.

6 Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Norwood

7 Manufacturing, Inc. (now dissolved) of Grand Rapids,

8 Minnesota, for damages incurred relating to the termi9 nation of a contract with the United States Postal Service

10 for the manufacture of wooden pallets.
2

•S 2409 IS

1 SEC. 2. (a) The payment made pursuant to the first

2 section of this Act shall constitute full settlement of all

3 legal and equitable claims by D.W. Jacobson, Ronald

4 Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Norwood Manufacturing,

5 Inc. (now dissolved) of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, against

6 the United States.

7 (b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as an infer8 ence of liability on the part of the United States.

9 SEC. 3. No part of the amount appropriated in this

10 Act in excess of 10 percent thereof shall be paid or deliv11 ered to or received by any agent or attorney on account

12 of services rendered in connection with this Act, and the

13 same shall be unlawful, any contract to the contrary not14 withstanding. Violation of the provisions of this section is

15 a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.

Æ
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2872 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording 

and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Worksite Reporting 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2872 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPATIONAL 

2 INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall 

5 revise the regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of 

6 Federal Regulations, concerning the recording and report7 ing of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occu8 pational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 

9 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a site 

10 log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring 

11 among all employees on the particular site, whether such 

12 employees are employed directly by the site-controlling em13 ployer or are employed by contractors or temporary help 

14 or employee leasing services. 

15 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

16 ‘‘site-controlling employer’’ means the employer that has 

17 primary control over the work on a particular work site 

18 and supervises the employees on a day-to-day basis on a 

19 particular work site. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 10-6670.

#### Lucian Oprea, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 656,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9348.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  report of GiveMePower  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
Bolokoski,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to  GiveMePower  Corporation  and will be retained by  GiveMePower
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Date:  February 14, 2005                               By: /s/ JIM BOLOKOSKI
                                                           -----------------
                                                       Jim Bolokoski
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalTown, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
October 14, 2008
 
 
 ________________ 
___
 Richard
A. Pomije
 CEO
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333 165568) on Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. (the Company) of our reports dated April 14, 2011, with respect to the balance sheets of the Company as of January 30, 2011 and January 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 30, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2011, which reports appear in the January 30, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

 

As discussed in notes 1(d) and 2 to the financial statements, the Company elected to change its method of accounting for inventory from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method in fiscal year 2011. The Company applied this change retrospectively in accordance with ASC 250, *Accounting Changes and Error Corrections*.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

April 15, 2011

 

----
# C_2014129EN.01003602.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/36

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 5 March 2014 — DC v Europol

(Case F-77/13) (1)

((Civil service - Europol staff - Invalidity - Invalidity allowance - Calculation of interest - Application for damages - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2014/C 129/44)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: DC (represented by: W. Brouwer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D.C. Neumann and J. Arnould, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision fixing the interest payable on the sum paid in respect of total incapacity for work following two accidents which occurred during two work-related journeys.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | DC is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DC is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 27.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131229 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. WILLIAM BUSHY, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

and

GERALD NAGTZAAM and ROBERT HAWKES, Plaintiffs,

v SC: 131229 COA: 262909 Gratiot CC: 01-070212-CL ROBERT L. BERACY and GRATIOT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question pr esented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings or dered by the Court of Appeals.

s0425 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2007

Clerk
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Superior Energy Services, Inc. (the
"Company") desires to amend the Superior Energy Services, Inc. 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") to comply with the New York Stock Exchange
requirements applicable to shareholder approval of equity compensation plans;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

I.

 

Section 5.2 of the Plan entitled "Share Counting" is hereby
amended effective December 7, 2004 to read as follows:

 

5.2     Share Counting.   To the extent any shares of Common
Stock covered by a stock option are not delivered to a participant or permitted
transferee because the Option is forfeited or canceled, or shares of Common
Stock are not delivered because an Incentive is paid or settled in cash, such
shares shall not be deemed to have been delivered for purposes of determining
the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for delivery under this
Plan. In the event that shares of Common Stock are issued as an Incentive and
thereafter are forfeited or reacquired by the Company pursuant to rights
reserved upon issuance thereof, such forfeited and reacquired Shares may again
be issued under the Plan. 

 

 

Adopted by the Board of Directors dated as of December 7,
2004.

 

 

 

 

	 	
		
/s/ Terence E. Hall

			 
	 	
		Terence E. Hall

			 
	 	
Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/S/  COREY M. HOROWITZ
------------------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
NOVEMBER 18, 2005
No. 09-11126.

#### J. Doe, Petitioner v. Richard L. Duncan, et al.

562 U.S. 1134, 131 S. Ct. 896,

178 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 599.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
No. 09-10533.

#### In re Jon Cox, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1086, 131 S. Ct. 688,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9323.

178 L. Ed. 2d 518,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 87, 178 L. Ed. 2d 260, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7728.
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment -1-

Decided and Entered: December 4, 2014 D -90-14

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; MICHAL TZHORI, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4134235)
Calendar Date: November 24, 2014 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Michal Tzhori, Shanghai, China, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2003, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object-2- D-90-14

to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
No. 10-5082.

#### McAaron Martin, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 1092, 131 S. Ct. 794,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9501.

178 L. Ed. 2d 532,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County, denied.
# C_2015429EN.01001601.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2015 — Lithuania v Commission

(Case T-110/13) (1)

1

((Community assistance programme for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe (SAPARD) - Financing by the European Union of certain expenditure incurred by Lithuania - Commission decision requiring Lithuania to reimburse part of the amount paid - Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 - Reference to the principles established by Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 - Scope of the multiannual financing agreement concerning the SAPARD programme - Sincere cooperation))

(2015/C 429/21)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas, R. Krasuckaitė, D. Skara and V. Čepaitė, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, A. Steiblytė and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Principally, application for annulment of Decision No FK/fa/D(2012) 1707818 of the Commission of 10 December 2012 in so far as the debit note No 3241213460 attached to it relates to projects whose completion has been assigned to undertakings which have been placed in receivership and to Project P27010010.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6772.

#### Vinh Quoc Ta, Petitioner v. James Walker, Warden.

562 U.S. 1093, 131 S. Ct. 797,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9532.

178 L. Ed. 2d 534,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
मित्रों और पररवार सेमवदेश िेंमिलने

जा रहेहैं?

खुद को टाइफाइड बुखार सेबचाएं !

टाइफाइड बुखार एक गं भीर, जानलेवा बीिारी है

• यह पूववी और दक्षिणी एक्शया (मवशेष रूप सेपामकस्ान, भारत और

बांगलादेश), अफ्रीका, कैररमबयन, िध्य और दक्षिण अिेररका और िध्य

पूव्विेंसबसेआि है।

• इन षिेत्रों केयामत्यरों को टाइफाइड बुखार का अधिक खतरा होता है।

• टाइफाइड बुखार अक्सर सबसेअधिक असुरक्षित भोजन और पानी से

फैलता है।

मनम्नलललखत सुझावरों केसाथ सुरक्षित रहें:

अपनी यात्ा सेपहले

• टाइफाइड बुखार केललए टीका लगवाएं ।

» अपनेटीकाकरण विकल्पों पर चचचा करनेकेलिए यात्ा सेकम सेकम

2 सप्ाह पहिेअपनेडॉक्टर सेवमिें।

अपनी यात्ा केदौरान

• अपनेहाथरों को बार-बार साबुन और पानी सेिोएं ।

• सुरक्षित खानेऔर पीनेकरी आदतरों का अभ्ास करें।

» भोजन सेपहिेखानेको उबािें, पकाएं या छीिें।

» के िि िही पानी वपयेंजो बोतिबं द हैया 1 वमनट केलिए उबािा हुआ

ह (6,500 ै फीट सेअधिक ऊं चाई पर 3 वमनट तक)।

» बफ्फ िािेपेय न वपयें।

» वकसी बीमार या हाि ही मेंबीमार व्यवति द्ारा तैयार वकया गया भोजन

न खाएं ।

www.cdc.gov/typhoid-fever/prevention.html

CS 315761-E