alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                      [KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Letterhead]


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

Board of Directors
Headlands Mortgage Company:

We have examined management's assertion about Headlands Mortgage Company's (the
Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31,
1997 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company has complied in all 
material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and 
for the year ended December 31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

San Francisco, California
February 13, 1998


                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

<PAGE>
 
               [HEADLANDS MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC. LETTERHEAD]


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, Headlands Mortgage Company 
(the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum 
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this 
same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and 
omissions policy both in the amount of $5.5 million.



                                     HEADLANDS MORTGAGE COMPANY



                                   By:  /s/ Dennis Tussey
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Dennis Tussey
                                      Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
# A hand up, not a handout

/ Published May 20, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33944-33945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Request for Public Comments on Information Collection Submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act

    A request extending the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's Clearance Officer at the 
phone number listed below. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or 
disapprove the information collection but may respond after 30

[[Page 33945]]

days; therefore, public comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 
days in order to assure their maximum consideration.
    Comments and suggestions on the requirement should be made directly 
to the Desk Office for the Interior Department, Office of Information 
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington DC 
20503 and to the Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807 
National Center, Reston, VA 20192. As required by OMB regulations at 5 
CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. Geological Survey solicits specific public 
comments regarding the proposed information collection as to:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the bureau, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the bureau's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used;
    3. The utility, quality, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and,
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: Consolidated Consumers' Report.
    Current OMB Approval Number: 1032-0084.
    Abstract: Repsondents supply the U.S. Geological Survey with 
domestic consumption data of 12 metals and ferroalloys, some of which 
are considered strategic and critical. This information will be 
published as monthly and annual reports for use by Government agencies, 
industry, and the general public.
    Bureau Form Number: 9-4117-MA.
    Frequency: Monthly and Annually.
    Description of Respondents: Consumers of ferrorus and related 
metals.
    Annual Responses: 2,923.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,192.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: John E. Cordyack, Jr., 703-648-7313.
John H. DeYoung, Jr.,
Chief Scientist, Minerals Information Team.
[FR Doc. 98-16506 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
No. 10-7036.

#### James Franklin Pipes, Petitioner v. David Ballard, Warden.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 669,

178 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9202,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 315.
No. 10-6930.

#### Alvaro Augustin Mejia, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1037, 131 S. Ct. 586,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8778.

178 L. Ed. 2d 427,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 U.S. App. D.C. 340, 597 F.3d 1329.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-221-001]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 19, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 17, 1998, Northern Border Pipeline company 
(Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become 
effective June 15, 1998:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet Number 138
Substitute First Revised Sheet Number 262A

    Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's letter order issued June 10, 1998 in Docket No. 
RP98-221-000. The Commission's June 10, 1998 letter order acquired 
certain housekeeping changes which have been reflected in this filing.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16894 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Manuel P. Asensio, Petitioner, v Nancy M. Bannon, Respondent.

[64 NYS3d 552]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16077]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0080]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Entitled Contract 
Financing

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(3090-0080).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve an extension of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Contract Financing.

DATES: Comment Due Date: August 17, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Matera, Office of GSA Acquisition 
Policy (202) 501-1224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
review and approve information collection, 3090-0080, concerning 
Contract Financing. Offerors are required to identify whether items are 
foreign source end products and the dollar amount of import duty for 
each product.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 2,000; annual responses: 2,000; average hours per 
response: .1; burden hours: 200.

Copy of Proposal

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA Acquisition 
Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by faxing 
your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: June 9, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-16077 Filed 06-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
No. 10-5078.

#### Jairo Gamboa-Victoria, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1065, 131 S. Ct. 639,

178 L. Ed. 2d 485,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9339.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-417.

#### Weldon Lackey, Petitioner v. Department of Agriculture, et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 656,

178 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9400.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 741.
No. 10-7121.

#### Carlos Israel Diaz, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

562 U.S. 1145, 131 S. Ct. 919,

178 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 392.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 947.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51030

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELIUTH SOSA-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-00-CR-387-1-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Eliuth Sosa-Garcia appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sosa argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Sosa acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348

(2000). 
No. 00-51030

- 2 -

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Sosa’s

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDREW F. KARACSONYI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1388

[November 18, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Kathleen H. Roberts, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432019MM002308A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2014448EN.01003802.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 November 2014 — CY v ECB

(Case F-68/13) (1)

1

((Death of the applicant - Reopening of the oral procedure - Legal successor choosing not to resume the proceedings - No need to adjudicate))

(2014/C 448/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CY (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Carlini and F. Feyerbacher, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the decision to close the administrative inquiry brought regarding psychological harassment allegedly suffered by the applicant and, secondly, of the inquiry report, and for damages to be granted in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | There is no longer any need to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1)

There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

| 2) | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 31.

1

---
# Guam builds resiliency through new resume writing skills

/ Published July 22, 2016
MARIANAS, Guam, 

Members of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Guam, Marianas, Continuing Government Activity recently attended a job resume skills class that was offered by Navy Base Guam’s Fleet and Family Service.

The class was intended to help employees sharpen their skills to continuously further their government careers in their chosen vocations, and was part of DLA’s ongoing efforts to support workforce resiliency.

Macy Ooka, the director of DLA Distribution Guam, noted that the instructor, Richard Taitague, caught and held the attention of the participants from beginning to end by demonstrating how to use the various USAJOBS tools.   Taitague offered tips on highlighting an individual’s strong points, the preferred resume format, and how to specify job location criteria.  All of these small details have a significant impact on job qualifications, especially if the competition is tight between applicants. 

“Mr. Taitague went above and beyond by not only explaining the importance of content and format of our resume but also the intricacies associated with successfully interacting with the USAJOBS process,” said Ooka.

Jay Sternadel, Guam’s contracting officer representative, particularly appreciated the knowledge Taitague shared on how to use VMET to translate prior military training and experience into acceptable college credits.  “The translation of military experience to civilian educational credits is a great tool to help enhance your resume’s content and strength,” he said. 

Franklin Leon Guerrero, Guam’s deputy director, received exemplary feedback from all that attended.  “Taitague’s knowledge, passion and enthusiasm for the subject were captivating and truly appreciated,” he said.  “Bravo Zulu to NBG Fleet and Family Service for a job well done.”
No. 09-10709.

#### Melvin Mason, Petitioner v. William E. Cassady, et al.

562 U.S. 850, 131 S. Ct. 100,

178 L. Ed. 2d 63,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6096,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-6428.

#### Donville James, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 988, 131 S. Ct. 430,

178 L. Ed. 2d 335,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8181.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 4770

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TYNISHA MARTIN KADIRI, a/k/a Martin Kadiri, a/k/a T D Martin, a/k/a Tynisha Martin, a/k/a Shug , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , Chief District Judge. ( 1:17

- cr - 00367

- JKB

- 1 )

Submitted : June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Gerald C. Ruter, LAW OFFICES OF GERALD C. RUTER, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert K. Hur, United States Attorney, Matthew J. Maddox, Assistan t United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tynisha Martin Kadiri appeals the 48

- month sentence imposed after a jury

conv icted her of two counts of aiding or assisting in the filing of false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) (2012), and two counts of willfully failing to file tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 (2012). On appeal, Kadiri challenges t he district court’s application of an abuse

- of

- trust enhancement, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.3 (2016), as well as the court’s reliance on the findings underlying the enhancement to justify an upward variance sentence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Because Kadiri did not raise her sentencing claims before the district court, we review only for plain error. United States v. Harris , 890 F.3d 480, 49 0 (4th Cir. 2018)

. To prevail under this standard, Kadiri must show that “ (1) an er ror was made; (2) the error is plain; (3) the error affects substantial rights; and (4) the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 491 (internal quotation marks omitted). Although Kadiri co ntests the district court’s decision to apply § 3B1.3, she concedes that the enhancement ultimately had no impact on her Sentencing Guidelines range. Because there is no dispute that the court arrived at the correct range, we conclude that any Guidelines error did not affect Kadiri’s substantial rights. See United States v. Cohen , 888 F.3d 667, 685 (4th Cir. 2018) (providing that third plain error prong requires

“ show [ ing ] that the error actually affected the outcome of the district court proceedings” (internal quotation marks omitted)). In addition, we discern no error in the district court’s3 consideration of the gross abuse of trust occasioned by Kadiri ’s fraudulent conduct in selecting the upward variance sentence the court imposed

. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1) (2012) (directing sentencing court to consider “the nature and circumstances of the offense”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present ed in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1177-000]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

January 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company (Wisconsin Electric), tendered for filing an electric service 
agreement under its Coordination Sales Tariff (FERC Electric Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2). Wisconsin Electric respectfully requests an 
effective date January 2, 1998. Wisconsin Electric is authorized to 
state that Tenaska Power Services Company joins in the requested 
effective date.
    Copies of the filing have been served on Tenaska Power Services 
Company, the Michigan Public Service Commission, and the Public Service 
Commission of Wisconsin.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 2, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1695 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M