alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,036
<SECURITIES>                                    17,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (83)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,983
<PP&E>                                           7,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,265
<SALES>                                          4,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,636
<CGS>                                            1,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,326)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Bancorp;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ James A. White

James A. WhiteChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERICA MARKUS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 260 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2015146EN.01004302.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/43

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — Gyarmathy v FRA

(Case F-97/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Staff of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Notice of vacancy - Rejection of candidature))

(2015/C 146/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Valéria Anna Gyarmathy (Győr, Hungary) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision to appoint another candidate to the position of ‘Senior Programme Manager’ and not to appoint the applicant to the second position referred to in the vacancy notice.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Ms Gyarmathy is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Ms Gyarmathy is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 26.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            I, David Klein, the Chief Financial Officer of Montana Mills Bread
Co., Inc. hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended October 30, 2002 filed by Montana Mills Bread Co., Inc. with the
Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Montana Mills Bread Co.,
Inc.

Dated:  December 17, 2002          By:  /s/ David Klein
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            David Klein, Chief Financial Officer

                                  Page 32 of 32
Germersheim, Germany

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

**Start Date/Time:**

Tuesday, July 1, 2025 12:30 PM

**Description:**

During the month of July, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, Europe, will transition to the Warehouse Management System. Customers with questions or concerns about their material are encouraged to reach out via the contact information foundon the DLA Distribution, Europe, location page.

Enrolled Users:

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
# C_2015198EN.01001302.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 April 2015 — European Dynamics Belgium SA, European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, European Dynamics UK Ltd v European Medicines Agency (EMA)

(Case C-173/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Public service contracts - Invitation to tender - Award criteria - Transparency - Objective assessment - Claim for damages))

(2015/C 198/17)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellants: European Dynamics Belgium SA, European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, European Dynamics UK Ltd (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński, S. Marino, G. Gavriilidou and C. Maignen, agents, H.-G. Kamann, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Belgium SA, European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics UK Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Belgium SA, European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics UK Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.

1

---
# C_2014024EN.01002902.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/29

---

Action brought on 14 November 2013 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)

(Case T-594/13)

2014/C 24/53

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sanctuary Brands LLC (New Canaan, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Richter International Ltd (Scarborough, Canada)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2013 given in Case R 1625/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 August 2013 given in Case R 1625/2012-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘TAILORBYRD’ for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark application No 9 325 507

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Non-registered figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘TAILORBYRD’, non-registered word mark and trade name ‘TAILORBYRD’ and the company name ‘Tailorbyrd, LLC’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom for ‘clothing, shirts’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

Earth Sciences, Inc.
Listing of Subsidiaries

                                        BENEFICIAL
NAME                                    PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP           DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Domestic Corporations and Entities
----------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                       <C>
ESI Chemicals, Inc. -                        100%                      a dormant Colorado corporation
ESI Minerals, Inc. -                         100%                      a dormant Colorado corporation
ADA Environmental Solutions LLC               83% of assets            a Colorado limited liability company
                                              51% of profits
                                                  and losses
Foreign Corporations and Entities
---------------------------------
ESI Resources Limited -                      100%                      an Alberta, Canada private corporation
Earth Sciences Extraction Company            100%                      an Alberta, Canada registered
limited partnership 389337 Alberta Corp.     100%                      an Alberta, Canada private corporation
Recursos Minerales VENESI C.A. -             100%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Minera Antabari C.A.                          83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales ESIGEO C.A.                83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Apicharai C.A.             83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Manaima C.A.               83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Mancai C.A.                83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Cudiez C.A.                83%                      a Venezuelan private corporation
Proyectos Y Asesorias GEO C.A.                67%                      a Venezuelan private corporation



                                       44
</TABLE>
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2The motion of appellee to strike Section A, pages 1-11, of

appellant’s reply brief is GRANTED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 11, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-60570

_____________________

MAGNOLIA I INC., A Mississippi Corporation;

HANCOCK ENTERTAINMENT LLC, a Louisiana Limited

Liability Company; WELDON FROMMEYER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

HANCOCK COUNTY MISSISSIPPI, a political

subdivision of the State of Mississippi,

Defendant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:04-CV-789

_________________________________________________________________

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.2
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph
Ackerman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2010 |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOSEPH
ACKERMAN       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Joseph Ackerman              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 10-569.

#### Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, Petitioners v. Bart McQueary.

562 U.S. 1137, 131 S. Ct. 927,

178 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 387.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 591.
No. 09-993.

No. 09-1039.

No. 09-1501.

#### PLIVA, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Gladys Mensing. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Petitioner v. Gladys Mensing. Actavis, Inc., Petitioner v. Julie Demahy.

562 U.S. 1104, 131 S. Ct. 817,

178 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9595.

December 10, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Same cases below, 588 F.3d 603.
结核病(TB)在美国仍然是一种重要的可预防疾病。据估计,在美国有多达1300万人患有潜伏性

结核病感染(有时也称为非活动性结核病)。因为潜伏性结核感染可以发展成活动性结核病,患

者会病得非常严重,并可能在不知不觉中将结核病传播给其他人,包括朋友、家人或医护人员。

检测和治疗潜伏性结核感染是在美国消除结核病和保护您的社区的一个关键步骤。作为您所在社

区值得信赖的健康信息来源,与您的患者就潜伏性结核感染和结核病展开对话是很重要的,因为他

们可能对这些情况缺乏认识或感到难堪。

这里有4个开始对话的提示:

介绍结核病,并解释潜伏性结核感染和结核病

对您的患者进行有关潜

伏性结核感染和结核病

的教育是很重要的,因

为许多人可能不熟悉或

对这些情况有某些误

解。这里有一些您可以

分享的简单事实:

在每个州都可以发现结核病患者;在我们工作的地方,在我

们居住的地方,在我们学习的地方,在我们与家人和朋友相

处的地方。

潜伏性结核感染是指一个人感染了结核菌,但目前没有活动

性结核病。潜伏性结核感染者没有结核病的症状和体征,不

会将结核菌传播给他人。但是,如果这些细菌变得活跃并繁

殖,潜伏性结核感染就会发展成结核病。一旦变得活跃,结

核病可以通过空气在人与人之间传播。

可以治疗潜伏性结核感染,以预防结核病。然而,如果不予

以治疗,它可能发展为活动性结核病,这可能是致命的,并

可能传播给其他人,包括朋友和家人。

 

与您的患者讨论潜伏性结核病

(TB)感染问题

用于医疗保健提供者的对话指南
讨论您的患者的风险

结核病是世界范围内导

致死亡的主要原因,在

美国仍有太多的人因患

有结核病而遭受痛苦。

结核病有几个风险因

素,所以与您的患者讨

论他们的风险很重要。

下面是一些可能会有帮

助的陈述样稿:

让我们根据世界上结核病常见的地区来讨论一下您的风险。 

结核病在全世界都很常见,但如果您出生在亚洲、非洲或拉

丁美洲,或经常到这些地方旅行,您感染结核病的几率就会

更大。即使您在美国生活了很长时间也是如此,因为它在这

些地区更常见。即使您已经接种了结核疫苗(也称为卡介苗

(BCG)),您也可能有感染结核病的风险,因为其保护作

用会随着时间的推移而减弱。

让我们讨论一下您暴露于高风险的个人的情况。如果您在结

核病比较常见的较大群体环境中工作、目前生活在其中或曾

经生活在其中,如无家可归者收容所、监狱或牢房,或者您

与患有活动性结核病的人相处过,您可能有较高的结核病风

险。 

让我们考虑一下您可能有的其他健康状况。 健康状况,特

别是那些可能减弱您的免疫系统的状况,如糖尿病、癌症或

HIV,如果您已经被感染,这些状况可能会增加您患活动性

结核病的机会。

 

解释一下检测过程

患者可能不熟悉潜伏性

结核感染的检测,所以

解释一下这个过程是有

帮助的。以下是一些可

能会有帮助的信息:

潜伏性结核病感染检测有两种类型: 结核血检和结核皮

试。 我更倾向于订购血液检测,因为它可以在一次就诊中

完成,而且如果您过去曾接种过结核病疫苗,它是最准确

的。

在您接受了检测并收到结果后,让我们谈谈下一步的事宜。

• 如果您收到阳性结果,我将建议您做其他检查,包括体格

检查、胸部X光检查和其他实验室检查,以了解结核菌是否

活跃或使您生病。

• 如果您收到的结果是阴性,并且我们排除了活动性结核

病,那么您不太可能有潜伏性结核感染,则不需要立即采

取下一步措施。但是,我们会讨论在将来您是否需要再次

接受检测。

 

结核病血

液检测

结核病皮试
讨论治疗选择

如果您的患

者检测出潜

伏性结核感

染呈阳性,

您要推荐更

短、更方便

的治疗是很

关键的。虽

然所有的治疗方案都是安全和

有效的,但短疗程利福霉素为

基础的治疗方案是潜伏性结核

感染的首选,因为它们的完成

率更高。

人们可能会因为与这种疾病

相关的错误信息或羞耻感而

不去寻求后续护理,所以帮

助他们完成整个治疗过程是

很重要的。在与您的患者讨

论治疗方案时,请考虑以下

信息:

即使您没有潜伏性结核病的症状,您也可能发展为活

动性结核病,活动性结核病会在人与人之间传播,会

使您生病,如果不治疗甚至会致命。

完成治疗对预防活动性结核病很重要。 您可能听说过

过去有人要经历漫长的结核病治疗,但现在有了短期和

方便的治疗。

让我们讨论一下治疗方案,任何可能破坏您的治疗计划

的潜在障碍,以及可以支持您的社区资源。患者对现有

的治疗方案有一些常见的问题,包括:

• 潜伏性结核病感染接受治疗有什么好处?

• 根据我的生活方式和个人健康史,您会推荐什么治疗

方案?

• 我需要多长时间服用一次这种药物? 我将要服用此

药多久?

• 服用这种药物的说明是什么?

• 这种药物的副作用是什么?

• 这种药物的费用是多少? 我的保险是否承保治疗?

如果不进行治疗,每10个潜伏性结核病患者中就有1人将来会患病。您

在减少结核病在您的社区和美国的传播方面发挥着关键作用。

要了解更多关于结核病以及如何保护自己和他人的信息,请访问 

www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb

301109
# C_2013101EN.01002001.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/20

---

Action brought on 21 January 2013 — Cactus/OHIM — Del Rio Rodríguez (CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ)

(Case T-24/13)

2013/C 101/43

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cactus SA (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Isabel Del Rio Rodríguez (Malaga, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 19 October 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 19 October 2012;

| — | Order the Defendant and — if applicable — Isabel Del Rio Rodriguez to jointly and severally pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Defendant and — if applicable — Isabel Del Rio Rodriguez to jointly and severally pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘CACTUS OF PEACE CACTUS DE LA PAZ’, for goods and services in classes 31, 39 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 8 489 643

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 963 694 of the word mark ‘CACTUS’ for goods and services in classes 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 39, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part and application rejected in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the appealed decision and rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 76(1) and (2) and 75 of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---