alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1735]



[[Page 3765]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Availability of a Plan of Operations and Environmental Assessment 
for a Plan of Operations, Texas Energy and Environmental, Inc. Plan of 
Operations for the Dunn-McCampbell ``A'' Lease, Padre Island National 
Seashore, Kleberg County, Texas

    The National Park Service has received from Texas Energy and 
Environmental, Inc., a Plan of Operations for the existing wells and 
production facilities on the Dunn-McCampbell ``A'' Lease at Padre 
Island National Seashore, Kleberg County, Texas.
    Pursuant to Sec. 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, part 9, subpart B (36 CFR 9B); the Plan of Operations and 
Environmental Assessment are available for public review and comment 
for a period of 30 days from the publication date of this notice in the 
Office of the Superintendent, Padre Island National Seashore, 9405 
South Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas. Copies of the 
documents are available from the Superintendent, Padre Island National 
Seashore, 9405 South Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78418, 
and will be sent upon request.
John E. Miller,
Superintendent, Padre Island National Seashore.
[FR Doc. 98-1735 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2091

ALLEN C. SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RUDCO SOUTH, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:17-cv-03477-TMC)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen C. Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Patrick Spruill, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER 

& BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Allen C. Sullivan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendations and granting summary judgment to Rudco South, LLC. On appeal, we 

confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Sullivan’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s 

disposition, Sullivan has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015414EN.01002501.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Oil Turbo Compressor v Council

(Case T-552/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Out of time - Inadmissibility - Claim for damages - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 414/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock) (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: K. Kleinschmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), in so far as the applicant’s name was included in the list of persons and entities to which those restrictive measures apply.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as being inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as being inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.

1

---
Final - August 12, 2021

PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s)

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Amanda Cohn (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

11:15 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines

Introduction

Evidence to Recommendations Framework: Additional doses of mRNA 

Clinical considerations for use of an additional doses of mRNA COVID-19 

Dr. Matthew Daley (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Kathleen Dooling (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Neela Goswami (CDC/NCHHSTP)

12:15

12:30

12:50 Discussion

VOTE

Additional doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines as part of a primary series Dr. Kathleen Dooling (CDC/NCIRD)

1:20

1:30 Update on emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and COVID-19 vaccines

Considerations for booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines

Discussion

Dr. Heather Scobie (CDC/CGH)

Dr. Sara Oliver (CDC/NCIRD)

2:30

Acronyms

CDC

CMS

COVID-19

EtR

FDA

GRADE

HRSA

IHS

NCHHSTP

NCIRD

NCEZID

NIAID

OIDP

SARS-CoV-2

WG

WHO

VE

Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Work Group

World Health Organization

Vaccine Effectiveness

Indian Health Service

National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB 

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory 

 

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/OID]

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

Evidence to Recommendations Framework

Food and Drug Administration

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development 

Health Resources and Services Administration

Coronavirus disease 2019

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

AGENDA ITEM

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

August 13, 2021

Friday, August 13, 2021

11:00 Welcome & Introductions

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Break

Public Comment

Break

Adjourn

page 1 of 1
No. 10-5561.

#### Messiah Ali Bey, Petitioner v. I.B.E.W. Local Union #3 Union Representatives, et al.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 696,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9080.

178 L. Ed. 2d 526,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 929, 131 S. Ct. 318, 178 L. Ed. 2d 208, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7471.
# C_2015127EN.01002501.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2015 — FSA v OHIM — Motokit Veículos e Acessórios (FSA K-FORCE)

(Case T-558/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark FSA K-FORCE - Earlier Community word mark FORCE-X - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 127/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FSA Srl (Busnago, Italy) (represented by: M. Locatelli and M. Cartella, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Motokit Veículos e Acessórios, SA (Vagos, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2013 (Case R 436/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Motokit Veículos e Acessórios, SA and FSA Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 August 2013 (Case R 436/2012-2); |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 August 2013 (Case R 436/2012-2);

| 2) | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
#### Frank Maki, Appellant, v The Travelers Companies, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Decided March 30, 2017

Appeal, insofar as taken as against defendant Northland Insurance Company, dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that as to that defendant the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
# C_2015046EN.01005001.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Canal + group v OHIM — Euronews (News+)

(Case T-591/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark News+ - Earlier national word mark ACTU+ - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 046/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Canal + group (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: L. Barissat and R. Joseph, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Euronews (Écully, France) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Schmitt, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2013 (Case R 1533/2012-4), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Canal + group and Canal + France and, on the other hand, Euronews.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Canal + group to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Canal + group to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

1

---
No. 10-6896.

#### Kareem Richardson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1036, 131 S. Ct. 584,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8724.

178 L. Ed. 2d 426,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# Property disposal specialist killed in Bagram to be inducted into DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published Sept. 13, 2016
# C_2014315EN.01005101.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/51

---

Order of the General Court of 5 June 2014 — Saf-Holland v OHIM (INTEGRAL)

(Case T-217/13) (1)

1

((Community trademark - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 315/86

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saf-Holland GmbH (Bessenbach, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2013 (Case R 2087/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark INTEGRAL as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
# C_2014045EN.01003202.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/32

---

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2013 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission

(Case T-32/13 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Nomination to post of Director of Directorate A ‘Civil Justice’ in the Commission’s Directorate General ‘Justice’ - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Nomination of another candidate - Misuse of powers - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 45/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2012 in Case F-120/11 da Silva Tenreiro v Commission, seeking annulment of that judgment.

da Silva Tenreiro

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
We offer the following as our comments on Water Quality Standards revision:

First, a disclaimer: We make laser diffraction instruments for particle sizing in water. Our 

instruments are widely used internationally, and recently became Required instruments by EPA 

as part of the Gulf oil droplet monitoring on ships, as example. 

http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants/subsurface-dispersant-directive-final.pdf

Our Comments:

1. Water Quality Standards should now require particle size distribution information 

(PSD). PSD is of fundamental importance in processes of transport of particles by 

flows and against settling; 

2. PSD is central to pollutant transport by attachment of toxics to particle surfaces;

3. It is time to abandon the nephelometric standards for monitoring particulate content. 

Dozens, if not hundreds, of scientific papers attest to the fundamental error in relating 

nephelometric turbidity to suspended particle concentration. Only laser diffraction 

technology offers correct estimates of suspended particle size distribution and 

concentration, rooted fundamentally in the physics of light scattering.

4. Laser diffraction technology is ready and available for measurements of PSD.

5. The technology is accepted by ISO as standard no. ISO 13320:2009; and by Amer. 

Water Works Assoc. as standard no. 2560D.

6. PSD information can also be used to identify specific pollutant species for purposes 

of public health safety.

Thank you.

Yogi

Dr. Yogesh C Agrawal, PhD

President/Senior Scientist

Sequoia Scientific, Inc.

2700 Richards Rd, #107

Bellevue, WA 98005

Tel: (425)641-0944 ext 106

Fax:(425)643-0595

http://www.sequoiasci.com
12/11/2015

Call of the Loon Productions petitions for exemption under:

Section 333; FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112­95 FEB. 14, 2012,

Section 333.

Call of the Loon Productions seeks exemption from the sections of 14 CFR as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c)

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5)

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a)

14 C.F.R 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2)

14C.F.R. 91.109(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1)

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2}

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b)

Call of the Loon Productions seeks exemption in order to operate a DJI Phantom 2 Quadcopter

UAV/UAS Aircraft for profit. We intend to provide services that include aerial videography and aerial

photography that compliment our work, which includes promotional videos for local businesses and

not­for­profit organizations.

Call of the Loon Productions would like to provide local businesses the opportunity to utilize aerial

videography and aerial photography in order to modernize the image of their business, idea or

product. The use of UAVs provide an extremely cost efficient alternative to traditional means of

aerial videography and aerial photography (i.e. fuel­powered aircraft flyovers). If local businesses

and organizations wish to use aerial videography and photography as a means to appeal to a

greater consumer base, then we would like to offer them that service in a comparatively inexpensive

and safe way.

Before each flight of our DJI Phantom 2 UAV, a two­member crew will conduct a Pre­Flight Safety

Inspection. Call of the Loon Productions will utilize the Geographic Information System known as

skyvector.com that provides a visual of aeronautical data in order to plan flights within cleared
airspace. Call of the Loon Productions will not operate the DJI Phantom 2 in densely populated

areas. Call of the Loon Productions will not operate the DJI Phantom 2 above private property

unless given consent. The DJI Phantom 2 will stay within the PIC’s line of sight. Call of the Loon

Productions will make sure that the DJI Phantom will be operated at 200 feet or under, and it will not

be flown at or around any airport, U.S. Military Base, or U.S. National Park. If the DJI Phantom 2

requires any maintenance or repair, it will be performed by the manufacturer, or any manufacturer

authorized facility.

Call of the Loon Productions wishes to safely operate our UAV in order to provide local businesses

services that would otherwise be unobtainable. Thank you for you time and consideration. We look

forward to hearing back from you.

Jake Coulter, Kristen Carton

Call of the Loon Productions

715 Tulip Street

Liverpool, NY 13088

calloftheloonproductions@gmail.com

(518) 810­5331
Exhibit 23.2



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-18962, 33-80839, 333-05709, 333-50749, 333-33266 and 333-42758 on Form S-3
and Registration Statement Nos. 33-91340 33-92918 and 333-84398 on Form S-8 of
Energy Conversion Devices, Inc., of our report dated January 30, 2002, related
to the financial statements of Bekaert ECD Solar Systems LLC, appearing in
Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Energy Conversion Devices,
Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2002.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
September 27, 2002




                                      140
No. 10-5106.

#### Garfield Redd, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1065, 131 S. Ct. 640,

178 L. Ed. 2d 485,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9389.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 413.
# C_2014061EN.01001302.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/13

---

Action brought on 18 December 2013 — Gugler France v OHIM — Gugler (GUGLER)

(Case T-674/13)

2014/C 61/23

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gugler France SA (Besançon, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alexander Gugler (Maxdorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 October 2013 given in Case R 356/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 October 2013 given in Case R 356/2012-4;

| — | Cancel the contested trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Cancel the contested trade mark;

| — | Order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to bear the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark ‘GUGLER’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 17, 19, 22, 37, 39 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 3 324 902

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds were those laid down in Article 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) CTMR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(c) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---