alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Know the Risks: Youth and E-cigarettes 

INFORMATION FOR USERS 

Purpose: CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) developed a presentation called, “Know the Risks: 

Youth and E-cigarettes,” to educate youth on e-cigarettes, including the health risks, the factors that 

lead to e-cigarette use, and what youth can do to avoid all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. 

URL: The presentation is available on OSH’s website. 

Length: The presentation will take approximately 45 minutes to deliver. 

Target Age Group: Youth ages 11-18 

Intended Presenter(s): The presentation is intended to be delivered by adults who educate or serve 

youth ages 11-18. This could include teachers, coaches, Parent Teacher Associations, youth ministry 

leaders, etc. 

Format: The presentation includes the entire script, so the presenter does not need additional 

information to deliver the presentation. If you have props available to make it hands-on and interactive, 

consider the following: 

• An e-cigarette such as a disposable e-cigarette

• Fake Brain

• E-cigarette refillable liquid

Qs & As: 

Can I modify these slides? 

No. The content contained within individual slides should not be modified. 

Can I add or delete slides? 

Yes. However, CDC is neither responsible for, nor does it endorse, any added slides. 

Do I need to be an expert on e-cigarettes to deliver the presentation? 

No, the presentation was developed so that any adult who educates or serves youth ages 11-18 can 

deliver the presentation without prior knowledge of e-cigarettes. Since you are serving youth directly, 

CDC OSH has provided you the content you need to educate youth on the risks of e-cigarettes. 

Where can I find more information on e-cigarettes and youth? 

Quick Facts on the Risks of E-cigarettes for Kids, Teens, and Young Adults

Know the Risks: E-cigarettes & Young People

Teen.smokefree.gov

Does CDC have a presentation on e-cigarettes for adults? Yes, a companion presentation on parents, ecigarettes, and youth can be found here. This presentation educates parents on youth e-cigarette use, 

including the health risks, the factors that lead to e-cigarette use, and what parents can do to help youth 

avoid all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. 
Do I need to have internet access to deliver the presentation? You can download the presentation and 

save it on your computer from CDC OSH’s website. Once downloaded, you can deliver the presentation 

without internet access.

Whom can I contact at CDC if I have any questions about the presentation? Please email the OSH 

Speakers Bureau at: oshspeakersbureau@cdc.gov if you have any questions. This email inbox is 

monitored regularly.
# C_2014024EN.01003401.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/34

---

Action brought on 21 November 2013 — Australian Gold v OHIM — Effect Management & Holding (HOT)

(Case T-611/13)

2014/C 24/63

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Australian Gold LLC (Indianapolis, United States) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Effect Management & Holding GmbH (Vöcklabruck, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 1881/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2013 given in Case R 1881/2012-4;

| — | Order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the cost of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the cost of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘HOT’ for goods in Classes 3, 5, 16 and 25 — International registration designating the European Union No 797 277

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds were those laid down in Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b)(c) CTMR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Granted the application for a declaration of invalidity in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(a)(b)(c) and Article 8(3) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2013325EN.01005301.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/53

---

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-309/13

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 226, 3 August 2013, p. 23
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 226, 3 August 2013, p. 23

2013/C 325/86

The notice in the Official Journal concerning Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon/OHIM — Gaba International (ELMA) is to read as follows:

Enosi Mastichoparagogon/OHIM — Gaba International (ELMA)

‘Action brought on 7 June 2013 — Enosi Mastichoparagogon/OHIM — Gaba International (ELMA)

(Case T-309/13)

2013/C 325/86

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A. Malamis, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gaba International Holding AG (Therwil, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 26 March 2013, in Case R 1539/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 26 March 2013, in Case R 1539/2012-4;

| — | Order the Office and other party (opponent before the Opposition Division and appellee before the OHIM’s Board of Appeal) to bear their own costs and pay those of the CTM applicant (applicant for annulment). |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office and other party (opponent before the Opposition Division and appellee before the OHIM’s Board of Appeal) to bear their own costs and pay those of the CTM applicant (applicant for annulment).

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “ELMA” for goods in class 5 — International registration designating the European Community 900 845

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration of the word mark “ELMEX” for goods in classes 3, 5 and 21

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.’

---
No. 10-7172.

#### Stephen Caracappa, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1075, 131 S. Ct. 675,

178 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9139.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 30.
# C_2015389EN.01006601.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/66

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015 — DI v EASO

(Case F-113/13)

((Civil Service - EASO staff - Contractual staff - Probationary period - Dismissed as manifestly unsuitable - Action for annulment - Lack of concordance between the application and the claim - Manifest inadmissibility - Action for damages))

(2015/C 389/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DI (represented by: I. Vlaic, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: L. Cerdán Ortiz-Quintana, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) to terminate the applicant’s employment contract after the probationary period, which was extended by three months.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | DI shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Asylum Support Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DI shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Asylum Support Office.

---
EXHIBIT 10.9


                     ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Addendum (the  "Addendum") is made effective as of the 15th day of
December,  1999 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and  Stephen  A.  Milne
effective as of December 16, 1997.

         WHEREAS,  the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of March
9,  1999  agreed  to extend  the term of the  Agreement  for a period of one (1)
additional  year which  extended the term of the Agreement to expire on December
15, 2002 instead of December 15, 2001; and

         WHEREAS,  the Board of  Directors  of the  Company  at its  meeting  of
December  14, 1999 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

         1. Paragraph 1 of the  Agreement with  respect to  the Term is  hereby
amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2003.

         2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.

ATTEST:                                              ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/ Mark T. Torok                         By:  /s/ F. William Hirt
    Mark T. Torok                                  F. William Hirt
     Assistant Secretary                            Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/ Charlotte F. Drobniewski                   /s/ Stephen A. Milne
    Charlotte F. Drobniewski                       Stephen A. Milne
     Executive Secretary                           6200 Ruhl Road
                                                   Fairview, PA   16415





                                       61
No. 10-6080.

#### Christopher Stoller, Petitioner v. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, et al.

562 U.S. 998, 131 S. Ct. 515,

178 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8391.

November 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# POW/MIA remembrance ceremony held at DSCC

/ Published Sept. 23, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Supply Center Columbus held a solemn yet heartfelt ceremony Sept. 16 inside the Building 20 auditorium in honor of POW/MIA day.

From poignant videos, a moment of silence, and a toast in remembrance of those missing in action decades earlier, the observance focused on our responsibility as a nation to those who served our country in uniform and their families to remain steadfast in bringing them all home.

“We owe it to all those who put on the uniform of the United States to remain unwavering in our promise to them,” James McClaugherty, DLA Land and Maritime’s acting commander, said. 

“They’re willing to pay the highest price to preserve our peace and freedom.  They do so with confidence, knowing that if captured, injured or killed in battle, our nation will make every effort to bring them home, that they will never, ever be abandoned or forgotten.”

The Columbus regional coordinator of The National League of POW/MIA Families, Liz Flick, was the guest speaker. Married to a U.S. Navy sailor she met while living in England where she was born and raised, Flick has been involved with the league since 1973 and is a staunch advocate for family members of those listed as either a Prisoner of War or Missing in Action. 

“If we send our men and women into harm’s way, wearing our country’s uniform, it’s our duty to do all we can to make sure they return home,” she said.

Flick weaved in stories of families who finally had their chance to say their goodbyes when their loved ones were returned to them after years of being missing. One such family was that of Col. Francis J. McGouldrick Jr., who taught Military Science at The Ohio State University before deploying to Vietnam in 1968. He went missing Dec. 13 of that same year and 45 years later to the day, he was buried in Arlington National Cemetery. One of his daughters was in attendance at the ceremony as Flick spoke. 

“(Those stories) underscore the reason we have National POW/MIA day,” Flick said. “Family members will tell you that getting an answer is the most wonderful gift you can imagine. 

“For those taken prisoner or lost in combat, our nation must continue to support their families and those working to recover and identify them, often in unbelievably difficult circumstances.”

Those in attendance also watched a moving video created by the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency about Sgt. 1st Class Alan Boyer, whose remains were returned to U.S. soil earlier this year after being listed MIA during a reconnaissance mission near the Vietnamese border in 1968.

Members of the Ohio National Guard presented the Table of Remembrance toast in honor of our POW/MIAs, and everyone joined together in singing “God Bless America” to close out the ceremony.
No. 10-6742.

#### Rufus Wright, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 545,

178 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8367.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Yuan Gang, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Junlian Integrated Surveillance, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 14, 2007 /s/ Yuan Gang Yuan Gang, Chief Executive Officer
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs)








Program Funding and Management										Related Pages
										Learn more about funding opportunities, programs, and initiatives.Funding Opportunities Open to ApplicantsSTI Funding at WorkProgram Management & Evaluation Tools
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  January 31, 2023						Source: 	Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homePublic Health ProfessionalsCommunication ResourcesProfessional DevelopmentFacts & InformationProgram Funding and ManagementData & StatisticsTreatment and Screening For Healthcare Providers For Public Health Professionals Follow STD STD on Twitter
STD on Facebook


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue
No. 10-6427.

#### Irwin Schiff, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 532,

178 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8614.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 649.
# C_2015389EN.01004202.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — GAT Microencapsulation v OHIM — BASF (KARIS)

(Case T-720/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark KARIS - Earlier Community marks and earlier international word mark CARYX - Earlier national marks and earlier Benelux word mark AKRIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 389/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG) (Ebenfurth, Austria) (represented by: S. Soler Lerma and C. March Cabrelles, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2013 (Case R 1862/2012-5) relating to opposition proceedings between BASF SE and GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gat Microencapsulation GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gat Microencapsulation GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
No. 10-6623.

#### Felicia Gay Camper, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 610,

178 L. Ed. 2d 444,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8951.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 346.
DLA Pacific welcomes new commander as Ellis receives accolades for job well done
 
  By John Hamilton, Chief of Staff, DLA Pacific
                    The ceremony concluded with the passing of the organization colors from Ellis to Daniels, marking the beginning of new leadership and Daniels' acceptance of responsibility for the command’s mission.