alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# NORAD director of logistics and engineering discusses future expeditionary support with DLA Distribution

/ Published July 27, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
To discuss the current and future relationship between DLA Distribution and United States Northern Command, DLA Distribution hosted Air Force Brig. Gen. Stan Sheley, director of Logistics and Engineering, North American Aerospace Defense Command and NORTHCOM, July 21.  

Sheley is responsible for the planning, coordination, and integration of strategic logistics and engineering to facilitate both the NORAD mission of conducting aerospace warning, aerospace control, and maritime warning in the defense of North America, and the USNORTHCOM mission of partnering to conduct homeland defense, civil support, and security cooperation to defend and secure the United States and its interests.

Supporting the combatant command with distribution functions such as full distribution centers, Consolidation and Containerization Points, Materiel Processing Centers, and retail capabilities, DLA Distribution currently maintains a strong partnership with NORTHCOM.  However, DLA Distribution key leadership and Sheley discussed further integration of DLA Distribution’s expeditionary capabilities into NORTHCOM exercises to further refine DLA support.

Following an overall DLA Distribution command brief, Sheley learned how DLA Distribution’s expeditionary team enables combatant commander distribution requirements that cannot be supported from the organization’s fixed based network of distribution centers, and supports the full range of military operations from humanitarian assistance/disaster recovery to major theater wars.  

The group outlined the process used to request expeditionary support, the deployment timeline, and various models of expeditionary that can be requested.

At the end of the discussion, Sheley commented on how much new information he had gleaned from the session.  "This has been a huge learning experience for me.  I am much more knowledgeable about DLA Distribution's capabilities than I was two hours ago," he said.  "DLA has come a long way in the 20 years when I was a maintenance guy."

Following the briefing, Sheley visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa.’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest distribution center within the Department of Defense.  There, he viewed the Consolidation and Containerization Point, and then toured part of a deployable distribution center.

Impressed with the organization’s capabilities, Sheley said "DLA is a first-class organization.  NORTHCOM cannot do what we do without DLA."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MONARCH
CEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,585,283
<SECURITIES>                                16,038,329
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,065,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                   505,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,807,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,782,798
<PP&E>                                     101,655,571
<DEPRECIATION>                              75,600,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,099,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,079,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,514,285
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,309,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,099,290
<SALES>                                     15,098,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,098,857
<CGS>                                       13,766,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,766,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013171EN.01003801.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/38

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — Hartmann v Commission

(Case T-233/13)

2013/C 171/73

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paul Hartmann SA (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission

Group’Hygiène

Commission

---
### Swanson, Brian (OST) F:rom: 

## ,,**:·~~~sent:** To: 

### Subject:
DearSir, stuart maki <maki25944@centurylink.net> Friday, August 17, 2012 2:21PM Swanson, Brian (OST) Brainerd MN. Regional Airport

We are emailingyou to urge you to choose Sky West airline to serve the Brainerd regional airport. Regards, Stuart&Christine Maki Maki25944@centurylink.net 25944455th Pl. Aitkin, MN. 56431

1
# C_2015205EN.01000801.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Property Development Company NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-16/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 11A - Application of goods treated as a supply for consideration - Application of a building for an activity exempt from VAT - Taxable amount for that application - Interim interest paid during the construction of the building))

(2015/C 205/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Property Development Company NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11A(1)(b) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, the taxable amount for the calculation of VAT on an application, within the meaning of Article 5(7)(b) thereof, of a building that the taxable person has constructed, is to be the purchase price, at the time the application is made, of buildings whose location, size and other essential characteristics are similar to those of the building in question. In that regard, it is irrelevant whether part of the purchase price is due to interest on borrowed capital.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
# Former DSCP commander to gain fourth star, command AMC

/ Published Sept. 19, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Congress has confirmed Army Lt. Gen. Gustave Perna, former Defense Supply Center Philadelphia commander, to be appointed to the rank of general.

Perna served as commander of the DLA Troop Support legacy organization from July 2008 to October 2009. He serves now as the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, U.S. Army in Washington, D.C. and will be assigned as the commanding general of the U.S. Army Materiel Command at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama.

“LTG Perna has always been a great asset in continuing the relationship between DLA and the Army,” wrote Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, DLA Troop Support’s current commander, in an email to the workforce. “He continues to be an advocate, supporting us across all supply chains, which in turn helps us provide superior support to soldiers across the globe.”
No. 10-6198.

#### Jeffrey D. Leiser, Petitioner v. Michael Thurmer, Warden.

562 U.S. 1173, 131 S. Ct. 988,

178 L. Ed. 2d 817,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 331.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 971, 131 S. Ct. 483, 178 L. Ed. 2d 305, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7988.
Order entered April 28, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00543
- CV
IN RE YAN BENJAMIN WILHELM ASSOUN, Relator Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 55049
- 2009 

### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.
We DENY relator’s emergency motion for stay. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harrington West Financial
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that
to the undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

         (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 12th day of November 2004.


                                     Harrington West Financial Group, Inc.

                                     /s/ CRAIG J. CERNY
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Craig J. Cerny
                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                     /s/ WILLIAM W. PHILLIPS
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     William W. Phillips
                                     Chief Operating Officer and
                                     Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-050-1150-04: GP8-0196]


Closure of Public Lands; Oregon

AGENCY: Prineville District, Deschutes Resource Area, Interior.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, effective immediately, the area 
described below is closed to motor vehicle use.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1998.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This closure applies to the area located in Township 
15 South, Range 13 East, Section 15, Northeast quarter; Section 15, 
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter; Section 15, Lots 3 and 7. 
The area comprises 254.80 acres. The property is located south of 
antler Ave. and east of SE 9th Street.
    The purpose of this closure is to deter the illegal dumping of 
trash and to minimize the public health risks associated with this 
activity. The extensive problem of illegal dumping in this area was 
recognized by the State Department of Environmental Quality as a hazard 
to public health. The Bureau of Land Management and Deschutes County 
have recently completed a major effort, at considerable expense, to 
remove trash and debris that has accumulated at the site. Deschutes 
County proposes to fence the perimeter of the property to curtail the 
continued dumping on the property. The tract is expected to be conveyed 
to Deschutes County by land exchange in 1998. The authority for this 
closure is 43 CFR 8364.1: Closure and Restriction Orders.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Paterno, Realty Specialist, BLM 
Prineville District, PO Box 550, Prineville, Oregon 97754, telephone 
541-416-6724.
    Violation of this closure order is punishable by a fine not to 
exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months as provided 
in 43 CFR 8360.0-7.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
Shaaron Netherton,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-17029 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
Served: OCTOBER 28, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0810 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

~- ... 

_.·, 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012NM060123) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

- ~~i: 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Todd C. Emerson 

Director- Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM -7 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0810 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONOVAN COSBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 185 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONOVAN COSBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 186 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONOVAN COSBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 187 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court[ 185 EAL 2020, 186 EAL 2020 and 187 EAL 2020 ]

- 2 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Beech craft Defense Company, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. FA8617-06-D-6150 ) 

FA8617-07-D-6151 ) 

F A8617-09-C-6166 ) 

F A8617-09-C-6 l 70 ) 

F A86 l 7-09-C-617 5 ) 

F A8620-07-C-4010 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61550 

James J. McCullough, Esq. 

Michael J. Anstett, Esq. 

Anayansi Rodriguez, Esq. 

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & 

Jacobson LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Debra E. Berg, Esq. 

Stephen R. Dooley, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Boston, MA 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD 

On December 5, 2017, a contracting officer issued a final decision asserting a 

government monetary claim for alleged noncompliance of Cost Accounting Standards 

under the captioned contracts. The decision was addressed to "Textron Corporation 

(Formerly Beechcraft Corporation)." In the notice of appeal, counsel for appellant 

asserted that the proper contractor under the captioned contracts is Beechcraft Defense 

Company, LLC.* Appellant subsequently moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction, asserting that the final decision did not assert a claim against a 

"contractor" under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S. C. § § 7101-7109. 

* Counsel also asserted that Beechcraft Defense Company, LLC has changed its name to 

Textron Aviation Defense LLC and is awaiting government approval of the 

novation. 
The government does not oppose dismissal. Further, the government has notified the 

Board that the contracting officer rescinded the December 5, 2017 final decision and 

provided copies of a final decision dated May 17, 2018, that states that the final decision 

dated December 5, 2017, is rescinded and replaced by the final decision dated May 17, 2018. 

Where a contracting officer unequivocally rescinds a final decision asserting a government 

claim, there is no longer any claim before the Board to adjudicate, and the Board has 

dismissed the appeal as moot. URS Federal Support Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 60364, 

17-1 BCA ,-[ 36,587 at 178,204; Combat Support Associates, ASBCA Nos. 58945, 58946, 

16-1 BCA ,-[ 36,288 at 176,973. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. 

Dated: June 7, 2018 

I concur 

OWEN C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

L~ 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61550, Appeal ofBeechcraft 

Defense Company, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# C_2014175EN.01004402.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/44

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — SACBO v Commission and INEA

(Case T-270/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Community financial aid to projects of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Lack of direct concern - Non-actionable measure - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 175/61

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Società per l'aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) (Grassobbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Muscardini and G. Greco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and E. Montaguti, Agents) and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) (represented by: I. Ramallo, Agent, and M. Merola, C. Santacroce and L. Armati, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 18 March 2013 of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA) relating to certain expenditure incurred in carrying out a feasibility study concerning the intermodal nature of the Bergamo-Orio al Serio airport (Italy) following the grant of financial aid by the Commission to the Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC, Italian national civil aviation authority).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application by the Republic of Poland for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application by the Republic of Poland for leave to intervene.

| 3. | The Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA). |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20. 7. 2013.

1

---