alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Billfish Tagging Report.
    Agency Form Number: NOAA 88-162.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0009.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 104 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 1,250.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 5 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Cooperative Marine Game Fish Tagging Program 
attempts to determine the migratory patterns and gathers other 
biological information on billfishes. When anglers tag billfish they 
are asked to report the date and location of the tagging, the species 
tagged, and their name and address. Persons that recovered the tags are 
asked to return the tag. The information is used in assessing the 
health of the billfish resources.
    Affected Public: Individuals.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20503.

    Dated: June 18, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-16869 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
No. 09-10909.

#### Jerry Hines, Petitioner v. Butch Jackson, Superintendent, Nash Correctional Institution.

562 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 396,

178 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7617.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 561 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 3523, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5431.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Escalade,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert J. Keller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Robert J. Keller    | 
|                        | 
|Robert J. Keller        | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 11, 2008          | 

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park; Advisory Commission 
Meeting

    Notice is given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act that a meeting of the Na Hoa Pili o Kaloko Honokohau, Kaloko 
Honokohau National Historical Park Advisory Commission will be held at 
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., July 18, 1998, Hawaii Community College, 
Manono Campus, 200 West Kawili Street, Bldg. 379-A, Room #6, Hilo, 
Hawaii.
    Topic of discussion will be committee reports.
    This meeting is open to the public. It will be recorded for 
documentation and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting 
will be available to the public after approval of the full Advisory 
Commission. A transcript will be available after August 15, 1998. For 
copies of the minutes, contact the Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical 
Park Superintendent at (808) 329-6881.

    Dated: June 8, 1998.
Bryan Harry,
Superintendent, Pacific Islands Support Office.
[FR Doc. 98-16494 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# C_2014395EN.01006501.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/65

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 — Osorio and Others v EEAS

(Case F-101/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Remuneration - Staff of the EEAS employed in a third country - Decision of the Appointing Authority amending the list of third countries for which the living conditions are equivalent to those normal in the European Union - Act of general application - Admissibility of the action - Annual assessment of the living conditions allowance - Withdrawal))

(2014/C 395/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Carla Osorio (Pointe aux Canonniers, Mauritius) and others (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 19 December 2012, taking effect on 1 July 2013, no longer to grant the living conditions allowance provided for in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations to officials employed in the Republic of Mauritius.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Osorio and the other applicants whose names appear in annexe to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Osorio and the other applicants whose names appear in annexe to bear their own costs;

| 3. | Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013, p. 41.

---
AD-ID: VCDC134500H

SPOT TITLE: Angie P_Love Yourself Tip_AVO2_30_NTP

LENGTH: :30

AS-RECORDED SCRIPT:

ART CARD: A TIP FROM A FORMER SMOKER®

SUPER: Angie, 62, Ohio

We see Angie in a black blouse and magenta cardigan sitting at a kitchen table.

ANGIE: I started smoking menthol cigarettes at age 15.

Cut to a close up of Angie speaking.

ANGIE: As a gay teen trying to figure out who I was, I hid behind cigarettes. 

Cut to a close up of Angie in a blue blouse looking off into the distance, not speaking.

Cut to a video of Angie walking through the house and sitting on a wooden bench on a balcony. She is 

holding a newspaper.

ANGIE: And then, when I figured out who I was, I was so addicted to nicotine that it was hard for me 

to quit. 

Cut to a close up of Angie speaking to the camera. She is sitting in the kitchen and wearing a black 

blouse and magenta cardigan.

ANGIE: My tip is, 

Cut to a close up of a side profile of Angie sitting on the porch in a blue blouse.

ANGIE: love yourself and get the help you need to quit smoking. 

Cut to Angie speaking to camera in the kitchen, wearing a black blouse and magenta cardigan.

ANGIE: You are worth it.

ART CARD: Tobacco companies aggressively market to LGBTQ+ communities.

ANNCR: Tobacco companies aggressively market to LGBTQ+ communities.

ANNCR: You can quit. For free help, text QUITNOW to 333888

ART CARD: You can quit. For free help, text QUITNOW to 333888

Logo/legal: CDC

Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

*Message and data rates may apply.
No. 10-313.

No. 10-329.

#### Talk America, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T Michigan. Orjiakor Isiogu, et al., Petitioners v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T Michigan.

562 U.S. 1104, 131 S. Ct. 818,

178 L. Ed. 2d 551,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9592.

December 10, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 597 F.3d 370.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ C. Stanley BaileyC. Stanley BaileyChief Executive Officer
*April*7, *2017*

2017-Ohio-1300.]

2017-0373.

#### Stevens v. S.W.L.H.S. Invest. Partners.

Lucas App. No. L-15-1129, 2017-Ohio-415. On appellants’ motion to stay execution of judgment pending appeal. Motion granted. The bond posted with the Lucas County Clerk of Court is continued.

O’Connor, C.J., and DeWine, J., dissent.
No. 10-108.

#### Donald Lee King, et ux., Petitioners v. Pioneer Regional Educational Service Agency.

562 U.S. 1003, 131 S. Ct. 504,

178 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8577.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 301 Ga. App. 547, 688 S.E.2d 7.
# Army Col. Fredric E. Johnson: the consummate Army petroleum professional

/ Published Sept. 15, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, *Editor’s Note: This article is based on papers sent by retired Army Col. Fredric Johnson’s son, Fredric Johnson II, to the DLA historians. These documents include Johnson’s nomination packet for induction into the Quartermaster Hall of Fame in 1992, letters of recommendation, a detailed obituary and various other items.*
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2819 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work in honor of Gold Star Mothers Families, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2819 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Mothers 

3 Families National Monument Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT 

5 OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

6 Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United 

7 States Code, the authority provided by section 2859 of the 

8 Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

9 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2164; 

10 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply through Jan11 uary 2, 2024. 

12 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

14 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

15 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

16 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

17 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

18 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro19 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

20 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2819 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a 

Mothers Families, and for other purposes. commemorative work in honor of Gold Star
# C_2014024EN.01003303.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Action brought on 21 November 2013 — Ecolab USA/OHMI (GREASECUTTER)

(Case T-610/13)

2014/C 24/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ecolab USA (St. Paul, United States) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant requests the Court to decide as follows:

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 September 2013 (Case R 1704/2012-2) is overturned insofar as the EU-designation of International registration no. 1103198 GREASECUTTER is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 September 2013 (Case R 1704/2012-2) is overturned insofar as the EU-designation of International registration no. 1103198 GREASECUTTER is rejected.

| — | The defendant shall bear its own costs as well as the costs of the plaintiff. |
| --- | --- |

—

The defendant shall bear its own costs as well as the costs of the plaintiff.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GREASECUTTER’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5 — International Registration No W 1103198

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refused protection of the International Registration designating the European Union

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
Order entered February 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01122-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 86664

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. 

Pursuant to this Court’s January 15, 2020 order, the trial court held a hearing to 

determine whether the child is an Indian child under the Indian Child Welfare Act. See 25 

U.S.C.A. § 1912(a). On January 31, 2020, we received a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the statutory notice requirements of the Act and a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing 

in which the trial court made an oral finding that the child is not an Indian child pursuant to the 

ICWA. 

We ORDER the trial court to make and file written findings from the January 24, 2020 

hearing regarding the child’s Indian status within FIVE days of this order. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Leslie Ray Hastings a/k/a * From the 35th District Court

Leslie Ray Hastings, Jr., of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR24255.

Vs. No. 11-16-00223-CR * July 26, 2018

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lee S. Eckert, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Flowserve Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Lee S. EckertLee S. EckertSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: February 21, 2019
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 24, 2010 ∗

Decided April 1, 2010



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

J OHN L. C OFFEY

, Circuit Judge

D ANIEL A. M ANION

, Circuit Ju dge



### No

. 09

- 3337

A LONZO P ERKINS

, Petitioner

- Appellant

,

v.

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA

, Respondent

- Appellee

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois

, Eastern Division.

No. 06 C 6642
Joan B. Gottschall

, Judg e

.

Orde r

After we affirmed Alonzo Perkins’s conviction and sentence, see 449 F.3d 794 (7th Cir. 2006), he filed a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255. The district court denied this petition, and Perkins appeals.

His principal appellate argument is that he is entitled to raise an ineffective

assistance

- of

- counsel claim on collateral attack even though he did not do so on direct appeal. This is a puzzling argument, because the district judge well understood that the

∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnec essary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 09

- 3337 Page 2

claim was proper, see Massaro v . United States , 538 U.S. 500 (2003), and resolved on the

merits.

Perkins submits that counsel was ineffective for failure to file a motion to suppress

evidence. The district court concluded that, even if such a motion had been filed and granted, Perkins was certain to be convicted, because the prosecution’s other evidence against him was strong. As a result, he could not have suffered prejudice from counsel’s omission (and it was correspondingly unnecessary to determine whether counsel’s performance was s ubstandard). We agree with this analysis, which need not be repeated here.

Petitioner’s only other argument is that he should not have been sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act. That contention was fully considered, and rejected, on direct appeal . We do not see any reason to resolve it differently today.

A FFIRMED
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1106

Lower Tribunal No. 2021CC-006402-0000-00

_____________________________

ICE RAK, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

ANTONE D. MOODY, MARIA “RIA” MARTINEZ, MARIA MARTINEZ, AUGUSTA D.

MOODY, LAQUINTA DIONNE RORIE, BRITTANY PLUMMER, JENNIFER ROBINSON,

BAILEY VEA a/k/a BAILEY OLIVER and HANNAH MILLIGAN,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Polk County.

Kevin M. Kohl, Judge.

December 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Ramil A. Kaminsky and Jacquelyn M. Codd, of Rak Law Firm, PLLC, Lakeland, 

for Appellant.

Jesse A. Haskins, of J. Haskins Law, P.A., Tampa for Appellees, Antone D. Moody 

and Maria Martinez.

Andrew S. Kanter, of Law Office of Andrew S. Kanter, Tampa, for Appellees,

Bailey Vea a/k/a Bailey Oliver and Hannah Milligan.

No appearance for remaining Appellees, Maria “Ria” Martinez, Augusta D. Moody,

LaQuinta Dionne Rorie, Brittany Plummer, and Jennifer Robinson.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED