alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DOLORES MILLS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1975 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 25, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# C_2014151EN.01002001.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/20

---

Action brought on 31 December 2013 — Invivo v OLAF

(Case T-690/13)

2014/C 151/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Invivo Ltd (Abinsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Huopalainen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | Review the legality of a failure to act on the part of the defendant in case OF/2013/0902 after it has been called upon to act by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Review the legality of a failure to act on the part of the defendant in case OF/2013/0902 after it has been called upon to act by the applicant;

| — | Order the defendant to act. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to act.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging failure to act based on Article 265 TFEU, as the financial interests of the EU are involved within the meaning of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (1) when the national agency that grants the aid receives most of its funds from the EU and where on the alleged abuser side legal entities from at least two member states are involved.

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (OJ 1999 L 136, p. 1)

1

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.32 MB)
 
 news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.32 MB)
 
 news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.32 MB)
 
 news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.32 MB)
 
 news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,924,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,020,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<PREPAID>                                      150,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,095,741
<FIXED ASSETS NET>                             214,812
<INTANGIBLE ASSETS NET>                        830,318
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,140,871
<ACCOUNTS PAYABLE>                           1,101,878
<PURCHASE CONSIDERATION>                             0
<NOTES PAYABLE>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,101,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,024
<ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL>                 7,685,767
<ACCUMULATED DEFICIT>                       (4,757,306)
<CUMULATED TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT>              88,508
<TOTAL SHAREHOLDER EQUITY>                   3,039,993
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,140,871
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,171,445
<CGS>                                        2,602,246
<GROSS PROFIT>                                 569,199
<ADVERTISING AND SELLING>                      891,491
<PROFESSIONAL FEES>                          1,102,963
<SALARIES AND BENEFITS>                      1,369,945
<AMORTIZATION>                                 126,232
[OTHER]                                      1,220,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,141,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              142,574
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (35,087)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,070,904
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, George G. Dorin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GPS Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  April 15, 2005                /s/George G. Dorin
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        George G. Dorin
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### EMC Mortgage Corporation, Respondent, v Stanley Stewart, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[769 NYS2d 408]—

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Stanley Stewart appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated May 29, 2002, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment dismissing his answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim, and for the appointment of a referee to compute the amount due, and (2) from an order of the same court dated March 21, 2003, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to extend the notice of pendency, and denied the appellant’s cross motion, denominated as one for leave to renew or reargue, which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs motion, inter alia, for summary judgment and the appointment of a referee.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated March 21, 2003, as denied that branch of the appellant’s cross motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated March 21, 2003, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated May 29, 2002, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

*773The appellant’s cross motion, denominated as one for leave to renew or reargue the plaintiffs prior motion, was not based on new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion, and therefore the motion was, in effect, one for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable *(see Reyes v Ross,*289 AD2d 554, 555 [2001]; *Duffy v Wetzler,*260 AD2d 596, 597 [1999]).

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, in response to the plaintiffs prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, he failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. The appellant’s pleadings not only raised no valid defenses, but acknowledged the default and debt owed. It is well settled that once a mortgagor defaults on loan payments, a mortgagee is not required to accept less than the full repayment as demanded *(see First Fed. Sav. Bank v Midura,*264 AD2d 407 [1999]; *Home Sav. of Am., FSB v Isaacson,*240 AD2d 633 [1997]). Accordingly, the plaintiffs refusal to accept a reduced settlement in satisfaction of the amount owed presents no valid defense in this foreclosure action.

The plaintiffs motion to extend the notice of pendency was properly granted, as good cause was shown *(see*CPLR 6513).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
No. 10-35.

#### Central Florida Investments, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Dawn Georgette Myers.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 392,

178 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6804.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 1201.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given of the following meeting of the 
Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community 
Service (Corporation).

DATE AND TIME: Sunday, June 28, 1998, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency, Burgundy A Room, 
500 Poydras Plaza, New Orleans, Louisiana.

STATUS: The meeting will be open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Corporation 
will meet to (1) approve the minutes of the February 24, 1998, Board 
meeting, (2) review reports from Board Committees and Corporation staff 
regarding Corporation activities, (3) make decisions on applications 
for AmeriCorps*State Formula, Indian Tribes, and America Reads 
assistance, (4) discuss ongoing collaborations with the Points of Light 
Foundation, and (5) consider and act on other matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda Taylor, Associate Director, 
Special Projects and Initiatives, Corporation for National Service, 
1201 New York Avenue NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20525. Telephone 
(202) 606-5000, ext. 282. T.D.D. (202) 565-2799.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternative formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and who need an accommodation to 
attend this meeting may notify Rhonda Taylor.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Thomas L. Bryant,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-16875 Filed 6-19-98; 4:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-924-1430-01; MTM 41504]


Public Land Order No. 7340; Opening of Lands Under Section 24 of 
the Federal Power Act; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order opens 1,278.84 acres of public lands in Bureau of 
Land Management Powersite Classification No. 334, subject to the 
provisions of Section 24 of the Federal Power Act. This action will 
permit disposal of the lands through a pending exchange and retain the 
waterpower rights to the United States. The lands are temporarily 
closed to surface entry and mining due to the pending exchange. The 
lands have been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ward, BLM Montana State Office, 
P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800, 406-255-2949, or Susie 
Williams, BLM Headwaters Resource Area, P.O. Box 3388, Butte, Montana 
59702-3388, 406-494-5059.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by the Act of June 10, 1920, Section 24, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 818 
(1994), and pursuant to the determination by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission in DVMT-243 and DVMT-247, it is ordered as 
follows:
    1. At 9:00 a.m. on June 17, 1998, the following described public 
lands withdrawn by the Secretarial Order dated February 18, 1943, which 
established Powersite Classification No. 334, will be opened to 
disposal by exchange, subject to the provisions of Section 24 of the 
Federal Power Act, and subject to valid existing rights, the provisions 
of existing withdrawals, other segregations of record, and the 
requirements of applicable law:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 2 S., R. 9 E.,
    Sec. 34, W\1/2\SE\1/4\.
T. 3 S., R. 9 E.,
    Sec. 2, lot 2, SW\1/4\NW\1/4\, and SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 10, all.
T. 4 S., R. 9 E.,
    Sec. 20, W\1/2\SE\1/4\ and SE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 30, lots 3 and 4, and E\1/2\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 32, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\.

    The areas described aggregate 1,278.84 acres in Park County.

    2. The State of Montana was afforded timely notice to file an 
application for a reservation to the State for any lands required as a 
right-of-way for a highway, or as a source of materials for the 
construction and maintenance of such highways in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 24 of the Federal Power Act of June 10, 1920, as 
amended, 16 U.S.C. 818 (1994).

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-16031 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
S91A0449.

#### GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES et al. v. COWETA COUNTY.

(405 SE2d 470)

Decided June 20, 1991 —

Reconsideration denied July 24, 1991.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Barbara H. Gallo,*for appellants.

Benham, Justice.

In the notice of appeal filed in this case, appellant asserted that it seeks review of an interlocutory injunction entered in a case involving a sanitary landfill in Coweta County. The enumerations of error, however, relate to issues which, so far as the record shows, were not raised below or were not ruled upon below. In fact, the trial court specifically reserved ruling on one of the issues raised by enumeration of error.

> The Supreme Court is a court for the trial and correction of errors of law committed in the trial courts, as shown by the record of what transpired therein which has been transmitted to it. *[Kitchens v. State,*228 Ga. 624 (1) (187 SE2d 268) (1972).]

Issues which have not been ruled on by the trial court may not be raised on appeal. *Velkey v. Grimes,*214 Ga. 420 (105 SE2d 224) (1958). Since the burden is on appellant to show error by the record *(Tukes v. State,*238 Ga. 114 (2) (230 SE2d 841) (1976)), and appellant has not borne that burden, no ground for reversal appears.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*485
      *Sanders, Mottola, Haugen & Mann, A. Mitchell Powell, Jr.,*for appellee.
No. 10-444.

#### Missouri, Petitioner v. Galin E. Frye.

562 U.S. 1128, 131 S. Ct. 856,

178 L. Ed. 2d 622,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 11.

January 7, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”

Same case below, 311 S.W.3d 350.
No. 10-400.

#### Stephen J. Murphy, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 536,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8506.

178 L. Ed. 2d 375,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 745.
No. 10-7779.

#### Carlos Rene Gomez-Murillo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1161, 131 S. Ct. 967,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 583.

178 L. Ed. 2d 795,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 341.
No. 10-6718.

#### Kryzstof Bogdan Czarkowski, Petitioner v. Don Mills, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution.

562 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 578,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8693.

178 L. Ed. 2d 422,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
2016-1772.

#### State v. Bell.

Clermont App. No. CA2015-10-077.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
No. 10-6556.

#### David Webb, Petitioner v. Joanne Sumie Onizuka, et al.

562 U.S. 1067, 131 S. Ct. 650,

178 L. Ed. 2d 488,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9166.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 608.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 271 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 271

    Making appropriations for Federal employees working during the 
 Government shutdown beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

   Mr. Brooks of Alabama (for himself and Mr. Posey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    Making appropriations for Federal employees working during the 
 Government shutdown beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Work Without Pay Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF SALARIES OF EXCEPTED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.

    There are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to pay, during the 
period of a lapse in discretionary appropriations beginning on or about 
December 22, 2018, the salaries and expenses of any officer or employee 
of the Federal Government who is excepted from the furlough resulting 
from such lapse.
                                 <all>
```