alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1717

CHARLES H. BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-192) Submitted: September 20, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles H. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. S. Douglas Murray, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles H. Boone appeals from the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the denial of social security disability insurance benefits. We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Apfel , No. CA-99-192 (W.D. Va. May 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Steven Seidler et al., Petitioners, v Sylvia G. Ash, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, et al., Respondents.

[49 NYS3d 915]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Sylvia G. Ash, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine three motions in an action entitled *Seidler v Knopf,*pending in that court under Index No. 506453/14.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Rivera, J.P., Hall, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
# C_2013233EN.01001201.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/12

---

Action brought on 30 April 2013 — Kompas MTS v Parliament and Others

(Case T-315/13)

2013/C 233/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kompas mejni turistični servis d.d. (Kompas MTS d.d.) (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: J. Tischler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament, European Commission and Council of the European Union

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Order the European Union to pay the sum of EUR 846 000 plus interest at the rate of 8 % or declare that a right to compensation for damage against the European Union exists; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Union to pay the sum of EUR 846 000 plus interest at the rate of 8 % or declare that a right to compensation for damage against the European Union exists;

| — | Order the defendants to pay the necessary costs pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendants to pay the necessary costs pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks compensation for damage in essence on the basis of the adoption of Article 5(6)(e) of Directive 2001/37/EC (1). It takes the view that it was only due to the adoption of that provision that it was possible for the Austrian legislature to restrict the importation of tobacco products on which the text was not in German. The applicant submits that that quantitative restriction on imports was caused by the adoption of Directive 2001/37, by which the defendants infringed the principle of proportionality, the principle of non-discrimination, the fundamental right to property and the freedom to conduct a business.

1

---

(1)  Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 26).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gregory C. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    GREGORY C. WALKERGregory C. Walker Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 17, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013274EN.01001002.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/10

---

Action brought on 12 July 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-395/13)

2013/C 274/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to make provision for the collection and treatment of urban waste water in 57 agglomerations with a population equivalent of more than 2 000 and less than 10 000, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to make provision for the collection and treatment of urban waste water in 57 agglomerations with a population equivalent of more than 2 000 and less than 10 000, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment; (1)

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its application, the Commission claims that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to implement correctly, in 57 agglomerations, Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment.

Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) of Directive 91/271/EEC required agglomerations with a population equivalent (p.e.) between 2 000 and 10 000 to be provided with collecting systems at the latest by 31 December 2005.

As regards urban waste water treatment obligations, Article 4(1) of the directive requires the Member States to ensure that waste water entering collecting systems is subject to secondary treatment or an equivalent treatment before being discharged.

Lastly, the control procedures laid down in Annex I D to the directive make it possible to ascertain whether discharges from urban waste water treatment plants comply with the requirements of the directive pertaining to the discharge of waste water.

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40.

1

---
GenOn Energy Inc. 

Conemaugh Generating Station

Infilco Degremont Inc. iBIO/DOWEX Wastewater Treatment System 

Provisional Performance Acceptance Test Plan 

Master Document - Final 

April 20, 2012 

Page 13 of 23 
GenOn Energy Inc. 

Conemaugh Generating Station

Infilco Degremont Inc. iBIO/DOWEX Wastewater Treatment System 

Provisional Performance Acceptance Test Plan 

Master Document - Final 

April 20, 2012 

Page 14 of 23
# Coast Guard to provide liaison officer to DLA

/ Published June 5, 2024
DLA Logistics Operations, 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s director of logistics operations and the commander of the Coast Guard Operational Logistics Command signed an agreement May 30 that will place a Coast Guard liaison officer with the Whole-of-Government Division at DLA Headquarters.

Under the first-of-its-kind agreement, which was signed by Navy Rear Adm. Doug Noble and Coast Guard Rear Adm. Carola List, an officer from the LOGCOM Expeditionary Logistics Division, Coast Guard Lt. Chad Huemme, will join DLA’s operations staff and help synchronize the two organizations for one year.

“While we are currently closely aligned with USCG logistics from a policy perspective, this is an exciting opportunity to get better insight into their real-time requirements and ongoing operations,” said Noble, who also serves as the DLA commander of joint regional combat support. “This is a bright spot in what has been a great partnership.”

Noble and List challenged their teams to develop quantitative metrics that measure the effectiveness of the role and assess whether to continue after the one-year agreement.

“The partnership between DLA and the Coast Guard has never been stronger, and this is an opportunity to expand on that,” List said. “Chad’s the right person for this job. I’m super excited to see what he does.”

Joe Brooks, director of the DLA Logistics Operations’ Whole-of-Government Division, said the LNO will help ensure interoperability in future operations.

“As we look across the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility, interoperability and interchangeability are musts,” he said. “We must have those qualities with our allies and partners and also with our own uniformed services, inside and outside of the Department of Defense.”
# A family affair: Korea hosts husband and wife reenlistment ceremony

/ Published April 4, 2016
CAMP CARROLL, Korea, 
DLA Distribution Korea commander Army Lt. Col. Mark Wolf hosted a double reenlistment ceremony for his material management noncommissioned officer Army Sgt. Stephanie Swann and her husband Army Sgt. Jonathan Swann on March 7.

Stephanie Swann joined the Army in 2009 and graduated from Advanced Individual Training as an automated logistics specialist. During her career, she served as a storage specialist, Battalion S-4 clerk and an orderly room operations clerk. She also participated in Operation New Dawn both in Iraq and Kuwait.

Her military and civilian education includes the Basic Leader’s Course, Army Lifesavers Course, Ammo 62, Defense Acquisition University Level 1, Equal Opportunity Leaders Course, Lean Six Sigma Green Belt and she is currently pursuing a Bachelor in Business Management. 

Her awards and decorations include the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, Iraqi Campaign Medal, Global War Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Korean Defense Service Medal, the Drivers and Mechanic badge and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

Her husband joined the Army in 2011 and graduated from Advanced Individual Training as a wheeled vehicle mechanic. He is a graduate of the Basic Leaders Course, the RTCH course and the Army Combat Lifesavers Course.  His awards and decorations include the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct medal and the Drivers and Mechanic badge. He is currently assigned to the 551st Inland Cargo Transfer Company, 498th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, at Camp Carroll, Korea.

“Both are outstanding leaders with bright futures in the Army,” said Wolf.
|    | RepWeekDate | Antigen Detection | PCR Detection |
|----|-------------|-------------------|---------------|
| 1  | 02/18/23    | 13.191            | 7.861         |
| 2  | 02/25/23    | 14.519            | 9.796         |
| 3  | 03/04/23    | 19.395            | 10.416        |
| 4  | 03/11/23    | 17.897            | 10.784        |
| 5  | 03/18/23    | 17.944            | 11.027        |
| 6  | 03/25/23    | 17.354            | 9.914         |
| 7  | 04/01/23    | 17.323            | 9.327         |
| 8  | 04/08/23    | 8.488             | 8.059         |
| 9  | 04/15/23    | 10.480            | 7.314         |
| 10 | 04/22/23    | 7.572             | 6.253         |
| 11 | 04/29/23    | 5.251             | 4.986         |
| 12 | 05/06/23    | 3.095             | 4.309         |
| 13 | 05/13/23    | 2.032             | 3.039         |
| 14 | 05/20/23    | 2.970             | 2.561         |
| 15 | 05/27/23    | 2.642             | 2.465         |
| 16 | 06/03/23    | 1.786             | 1.839         |
| 17 | 06/10/23    | 3.593             | 1.167         |
| 18 | 06/17/23    | 1.493             | 1.117         |
| 19 | 06/24/23    | 1.432             | 0.957         |
| 20 | 07/01/23    | 1.399             | 0.834         |
| 21 | 07/08/23    | 0.000             | 0.935         |
| 22 | 07/15/23    | 1.389             | 0.482         |
| 23 | 07/22/23    | 0.000             | 0.503         |
| 24 | 07/29/23    | 0.613             | 0.439         |
| 25 | 08/05/23    | 0.671             | 0.418         |
| 26 | 08/12/23    | 0.543             | 0.335         |
| 27 | 08/19/23    | 0.000             | 0.434         |
| 28 | 08/26/23    | 0.000             | 0.352         |
| 29 | 09/02/23    | 0.000             | 0.335         |
| 30 | 09/09/23    | 0.000             | 0.246         |
| 31 | 09/16/23    | 0.000             | 0.230         |
| 32 | 09/23/23    | 0.499             | 0.204         |
| 33 | 09/30/23    | 1.005             | 0.220         |
| 34 | 10/07/23    | 0.546             | 0.398         |
| 35 | 10/14/23    | 0.605             | 0.331         |
| 36 | 10/21/23    | 0.853             | 0.340         |
| 37 | 10/28/23    | 0.000             | 0.458         |
| 38 | 11/04/23    | 1.333             | 0.472         |
| 39 | 11/11/23    | 0.388             | 0.644         |
| 40 | 11/18/23    | 1.429             | 0.716         |
| 41 | 11/25/23    | 1.091             | 0.871         |
| 42 | 12/02/23    | 0.000             | 0.907         |
| 43 | 12/09/23    | 0.000             | 0.937         |
| 44 | 12/16/23    | 0.000             | 0.906         |
| 45 | 12/23/23    | 1.090             | 1.079         |
| 46 | 12/30/23    | 0.000             | 1.200         |
| 47 | 01/06/24    | 1.786             | 1.413         |
| 48 | 01/13/24    | 2.857             | 1.280         |
| 49 | 01/20/24    | 3.285             | 1.299         |
| 50 | 01/27/24    | 4.152             | 1.465         |
| 51 | 02/03/24    | 5.300             | 2.019         |
| 52 | 02/10/24    | 0.000             | 2.509         |
No. 10-396.

#### Board of Directors of the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

562 U.S. 1063, 131 S. Ct. 653,

178 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9214.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 1074.
No. 10-7291.

#### Alfonzo Jermaine Johnlouis, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

562 U.S. 1150, 131 S. Ct. 932,

178 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 186.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 22 So. 3d 1150.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-192-001]


K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company; Notice of 
Tariff Filing

June 11, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 8, 1998, K N Wattenberg Transmission 
Limited Liability Co. (KNW) tendered for filing to become a part of 
KNW's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following 
revised tariff sheet to be effective May 22, 1998:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 18
Substitute Original Sheet No. 20
Substitute Original Sheet No. 31
Substitute Original Sheet No. 34
Substitute Original Sheet No. 48
Substitute Original Sheet No. 49
Substitute Original Sheet No. 67
Substitute Original Sheet No. 89
Substitute Original Sheet No. 97

    KNW states that these tariff sheets are being filed to comply with 
the Commission's May 22, 1998 order accepting tariff filing subject to 
conditions in the above-captioned docket.
    KNW states that copies of the filing were served upon KNW's 
customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commissions' Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16037 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     11,775,000
<SECURITIES>                                9,846,000         
<RECEIVABLES>                              17,463,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,294,000
<INVENTORY>                                74,069,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          114,545,000 
<PP&E>                                    280,508,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            148,144,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            283,315,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      97,193,000
<BONDS>                                   100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 28,271,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              283,315,000
<SALES>                                   943,805,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          943,805,000
<CGS>                                     710,830,000         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             710,830,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          225,030,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         11,870,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (3,925,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3,925,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                              (3,925,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jagminder Sawhney, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 817]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), rendered November 20, 2015, convicting him of attempted arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sole issue raised by the defendant on his appeal from the judgment of conviction is whether the sentence imposed was excessive. The record, however, demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see People v Sanders,*25 NY3d 337, 339-342 [2015]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). The defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d at 255-256).

Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Cohen and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
# C_2014421EN.01004301.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/43

---

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Bitiqi and Others v Commission and Others

(Case T-410/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - ‘Rule of law’ mission conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eurlex Kosovo) - Decisions of the head of the mission not to renew the employment contracts - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

2014/C 421/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Burim Bitiqi (London, United Kingdom); Arlinda Gjebrea (Pristina, Kosovo); Anna Gorska (Warsaw, Poland); Agim Hajdini (London); Josefa Martínez Estéve (Valencia, Spain); Denis Vasile Miron (Bucharest, Romania); James Nicholls (Swindon, United Kingdom); Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani (Varna, Bulgaria); Andrei Mihai Popovici (Bucharest); and Amaia San José Ortiz (Llodio, Spain) (represented: initially by A. Coolen, D. de Abreu Caldas, É. Marchal and J. N. Louis, then by D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J. N. Louis, avocats)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and A. C. Simon, acting as Agents); European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, É. Chaboureau and M. Silva, acting as Agents); AND Eulex Kosovo (represented by: B. Borchardt, acting as Agent, and by A. Fouquet Dörte, lawyer)

Defendants:

Intervener in support of the defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decisions of the head of the mission ‘Rule of law’ conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) of 27 May and 2 July 2013 not to renew the applicants’ employment contracts.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Burim Bitiqi, Arlinda Gjebrea, Anna Gorska, Agim Hajdini, Josefa Martínez Estéve, Denis Vasile Miron, James Nicholls, Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani, Andrei Mihai Popovici, Amaia San José Ortiz are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Burim Bitiqi, Arlinda Gjebrea, Anna Gorska, Agim Hajdini, Josefa Martínez Estéve, Denis Vasile Miron, James Nicholls, Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani, Andrei Mihai Popovici, Amaia San José Ortiz are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo.

| 3. | The Council of the European Union is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---