alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Crime Prevention Month: Protect yourself
 
  By DLA Security and Emergency Services
  October is Crime Prevention Month, and security officials in Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support are encouraging employees to protect themselves, both at work and in their personal lives. “Security is everyone’s business,” said Alex Logan, a physical security specialist for DLA Installation Support, Security and Emergency Services. “While we focus all our energy on protecting DLA’s personnel and missions, no one cares more about your individual security than you do!” DLA security professionals are on the job across the world, but every DLA employee needs to be security aware not just in the workplace, but also in public and at home. Studies show people are more likely to be confronted by danger in public, away from the security of their locked home or office. A variety of factors can make someone a more inviting target. “Perhaps the most common is being unaware of your surroundings. Criminals tend to focus on targets who are distracted by talking on their phone, looking at a map, fiddling with bags or focusing on their kids. In fact, one study of thousands of convicts noted 60 percent of criminals moved on to target a different person if the initial one simply made eye contact with them. “It’s obvious that paying attention to the people around you makes you a much harder target,” said Logan. Being unaware of your surroundings may also lead us to stand out in a crowd. Whether in your local community or traveling, you should try to blend in with the people around you. Make sure your clothing, conduct or mannerisms don’t attract undue attention. You’re less likely to be a target of criminals if they don’t notice you. Of course location is also a key factor in victim selection, so avoid isolated areas, or areas with poor lighting and visibility. Security awareness shouldn’t end at your front door, either. Pay attention to the information criminals can glean from observing your house whether you’re away or at home. Newspapers or mail stacking up might indicate you’re away for some time. So might boxes stacked on the porch. Alternatively, be careful about leaving entrances to you home unsecured when you’re there. Open garages or flimsy screen doors are an invitation for criminals. Always stay alert if you choose to leave them open. “The bottom line to your security awareness both at work and away is to stay alert,” Logan said. “Hopefully these tips will help us all be a little more aware of the threats we face,” he said. “The most important thing we can all do is always be aware of our surroundings. Stay alert in public, avoid distractions and be careful who you allow into your home, and you will go a long way toward becoming a hard target.”
No. 10-7116.

#### Roderick Stutts, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 672,

178 L. Ed. 2d 500,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9245.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 317.
No. 10-7754.

#### Melvin Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1170, 131 S. Ct. 965,

178 L. Ed. 2d 806,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 142.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 739.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe annual report of Quixote Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the Annual Period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the officersof the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to suchofficer’s knowledge:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:  |   | September 12, 2006 |   | /s/ Leslie J. Jezuit                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                    |   | Leslie J. Jezuit, Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:  |   | September 12, 2006 |   | /s/ Daniel P. Gorey                       |
|   |   |                    |   | Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

----
No. 10-7256.

#### Kwadjo A. Durity, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 680,

178 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9211.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

*506Same case below, 998 A.2d 866.
2017-0400.

#### State v. Smith.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104403, 2017-Ohio-463.
# C_2017121EN.01002002.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2017 — France v Commission

(Case T-366/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Maritime cabotage - Aid implemented by France in favour of the Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) and the Compagnie méridionale de navigation - Service of general economic interest - Compensation for a service additional to the basic service intended to cover peak periods during the tourist season - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - Advantage - Altmark judgment))

(2017/C 121/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: initially, E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and N. Rouam, then G. de Bergues, D. Colas, F. Alabrune and J. Bousin, and subsequently D. Colas, F. Alabrune and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/435/EU of 2 May 2013 on State aid SA.22843 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (OJ 2013 L 220, p. 20).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission, including those incurred in the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission, including those incurred in the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6867.

#### Ronald Haddad, Jr., Petitioner v. River Forest Police Department, et al.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 825,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9672,

178 L. Ed. 2d 563,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 513.
No. 10-7488.

#### Naomi B. Knight, Petitioner v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America.

562 U.S. 1185, 131 S. Ct. 1009,

178 L. Ed. 2d 838,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 851.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 575.
No. 10-6457.

#### Russell L. Stevens, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 606,

178 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8974.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17441]



[[Page 36284]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    The Social Security Administration publishes a list of information 
collection packages that will require clearance by OMB in compliance 
with P.L. 104-13 effective October 1, 1995, The Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995. The information collection listed below has been submitted to 
OMB for emergency clearance. OMB approval has been requested by July 8, 
1998:
    0960-NEW. SSA has contracted with the Gallup Organization to 
conduct a survey to gather baseline data on the public's current level 
of knowledge of the Social Security programs. The information will 
enable SSA to establish a clear, quantitative baseline measure of 
public understanding of SSA programs against which the outcomes of SSA 
performance improvement efforts can be assessed. The relevant 
performance objective contained in SSA's strategic plan is that by the 
year 2005, 90 percent of all American adults will be knowledgeable 
about Social Security programs in five broad areas: basic program 
facts; the financial value of programs to individuals; the economic and 
social impact of SSA programs; how the programs are financed today; and 
financing issues. The respondents are randomly selected adults residing 
in the United States.
    Number of Respondents: 4,000.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 12 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 800 hours.
    To receive a copy of the form or clearance packages, call the SSA 
Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965-4145 or write to him at the 
address listed below. Written comments and recommendations regarding 
the information collection(s) should be directed to the OMB Desk 
Officer and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the following addresses:

(OMB)

Office of Management and Budget, OIRA, Attn: Laura Oliven, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10230, 725 17th St., NW., Washington, 
D.C. 20503

(SSA)

Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Frederick W. Brickenkamp, 
6401 Security Blvd, 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., Baltimore, MD 21235

    Dated: June 25, 1998.
Frederick W. Brickenkamp,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-17441 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-U
# C_2013207EN.01005201.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/52

---

Action brought on 22 May 2013 — Iglotex/OHIM — Iglo Foods Group (IGLOTEX)

(Case T-282/13)

2013/C 207/84

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iglotex S.A. (Skórcz, Poland) (represented by: I. Helbig, P. Hansmersmann and S. Rengshausen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Iglo Foods Group Ltd (Feltham, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Annul the decision of the Opposition Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Opposition Division;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘IGLOTEX’ — Community trade mark application No 9 283 367 for goods in classes 29 and 30

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘IGLO’ for goods in classes 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 5 740 238

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-6607.

#### Raymond Shelton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 992, 131 S. Ct. 440,

178 L. Ed. 2d 341,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8269.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 733.
# C_2015302EN.01001001.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece)) — Konstantinos Maïstrellis v Ypourgos Dikaiosynis, Diafaneias kai Anthropinon Dikaiomaton

(Case C-222/14) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 96/34/EC - Framework agreement on parental leave - Clause 2.1 - Individual right to parental leave on the grounds of the birth of a child - National legislation denying the right to such leave for a staff member whose wife does not work - Directive 2006/54/EC - Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation - Articles 2(1)(a) and 14(1)(c) - Working conditions - Direct discrimination))

(2015/C 302/12)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Konstantinos Maïstrellis

Applicant:

Defendant: Ypourgos Dikaiosynis, Diafaneias kai Anthropinon Dikaiomaton

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, as amended by Council Directive 97/75/EC of 15 December 1997, and Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation, must be interpreted as precluding national provisions under which a civil servant is not entitled to parental leave in a situation where his wife does not work or exercise any profession, unless it is considered that due to a serious illness or injury the wife is unable to meet the needs related to the upbringing of the child.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
[4910-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fe_deral Aviation Administration

14eFR Part 39

;)DID-OOG

[Docket No. FAA-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-127-AD)

RIN 2120-AA64

'210

t-JM-I

:<' !oIS'SIG

.a-..-

'\ {-,£ I, 0

Reassessment of the damage tolerance analysis resulted in

threshold reduction for some Structure Significant Items (SSI) of

the Maintenance Review Board Report (MRBR) Airv.rorthiness

Limitations Items (ALl). Failure to inspect these structural

components, according to the new threshold, could prevent a

timely detection of fatigue cracking. These cracks, if not properly

addressed, could adversely affect the structural integrity of the

airplane.

condition as:

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe ~~E •

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated byan aviation authority of another country to identify

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

* * * * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditio

described in the MeAL
# C_2014039EN.01002402.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/24

---

Action brought on 2 December 2013 — Sto v OHIM — Fixit Trockenmörtel Holding (CRETEO)

(Case T-640/13)

2014/C 39/43

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sto AG (Stühlingen, Germany) (represented by: K. Kern and J. Sklepek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fixit Trockenmörtel Holding AG (Baar, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 September 2013 in Case R 905/2012-4 to the effect that the opposition is upheld to the extent put forward in the appeal and Community trade mark application No 9207085 is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 September 2013 in Case R 905/2012-4 to the effect that the opposition is upheld to the extent put forward in the appeal and Community trade mark application No 9207085 is rejected;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Fixit Trockenmörtel Holding AG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘CRETEO’ for goods in Classes 1, 2, 17 and 19 — Community trade mark application No 9207085

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word marks ‘StoCretec’ and ‘STOCRETE’ for goods in Classes 1, 2, 17 and 19

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2017104EN.01001301.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/13

---

Judgment of the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February 2017 — Portovesme Srl v European Commission

(Case C-606/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Aid granted by the Italian Republic in favour of Portovesme Srl - Preferential tariff arrangements for electricity - Decision declaring the aid measure to be incompatible with the internal market))

(2017/C 104/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Portovesme Srl (represented by: G. Dore, M. Liberati, A. Vinci and F. Ciulli, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Portovesme Srl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Portovesme Srl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.03.2015

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Sheldon C. Fenton certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 2, 2005                /s/Russell D. Van Zandt   Russell D. Van Zandt   Chief Financial Officer andChairman  
20
# Energy projects at DFSP Tampa conserve energy, save money

/ Published Dec. 10, 2015
TAMPA, Florida,