alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2773 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2773

   To amend title 13, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Commerce to conduct a mid-decade census of population for the Northern 
Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2019

     Mr. Sablan (for himself, Mr. San Nicolas, and Mrs. Radewagen) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 13, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Commerce to conduct a mid-decade census of population for the Northern 
Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CENSUS FOR THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, GUAM, AMERICAN 
              SAMOA, AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by adding after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) The Secretary shall, in 2025 and every 10 years thereafter, 
take a mid-decade census of population as of the first day of April of 
the applicable year for each of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, 
American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purpose of carrying 
out the amendments made by subsection (a), there are authorized to be 
appropriated $12,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2020 to 2024 
and $6,000,000 for each succeeding fiscal year after 2024.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-287.

#### Innovative Therapies, Inc., Petitioner v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 982, 131 S. Ct. 424,

178 L. Ed. 2d 324,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8277.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 1377.
#### Cody W., Matter of (Ronald L.)

2d Dept: 148 AD3d 914 (Proceeding No. 1)

denied
#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT C. COLLINS, JR.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 894)

(411 SE2d 711)

Per curiam.

Pursuant to a default order entered against Robert C. Collins, Jr., the special master found that Collins admitted violating Standards 22, 44, and 68 of Bar Rule 4-102. The special master found that Collins had abandoned a legal matter entrusted to him by his client, had refused to return the client’s file to her, and had failed to take reasonable steps to avoid prejudice to his client’s rights. The special master found that, as a result of Collins’ actions, his client was forced to hire a new attorney to pursue the legal matter and to pay the superior court for a copy of her file. The special master recommended that appropriate discipline be imposed.

The Review Panel found that Collins had violated Standards 22, 44, and 68 of Bar Rule 4-102. The Review Panel recommends to this Court that we suspend Collins from the practice of law in Georgia for one year, with the suspension to run consecutively to Collins’ one-year suspension in *In the Matter of Robert C. Collins, Jr.,*261 Ga. 622 (409 SE2d 662) (1991). The Review Panel also recommends that, as conditions to reinstatement, Collins must provide proof that he has returned the file of his client to her and that he has refunded $270 to her.

We hereby adopt the Review Panel’s recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend Collins from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension to run consecutively to Collins’ one-year suspension in *In the Matter of Robert C. Collins, Jr.,*supra, 261 Ga. As Collins’ suspension in *In the Matter of Robert C. Collins, Jr.,*supra, 261 Ga., *803began on November 1, 1991, the current one-year suspension will begin on November 1, 1992. Moreover, we order that, before Collins can be reinstated to practice law, he must provide proof that he has returned his client’s file and refunded the $270.

Decided January 9, 1992.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Cynthia C. Hinrichs, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Thomas L. Burton, David R. Osborne,*for Collins.

*One-year suspension.*

*Clarke, C. J., Weltner, P. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham and Fletcher, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                EATON CORPORATION
                         2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                   ITEM 15(B)
                                   EXHIBIT 12
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Year ended December 31
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                          2006     2005    2004    2003    2002
                                         ------   ------   ----   -----   ------
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>    <C>     <C>
(Millions of dollars)
Income from continuing operations
   before income taxes                   $  989   $  988   $768   $ 492   $ 384

Adjustments
-----------
Minority interests in consolidated
   subsidiaries                              10        5      7      12      14
Loss (income) from equity investees           1        1             (3)     (1)
Interest expensed                           139      109     88      93     110
Amortization of debt issue costs              1        1      1       2       2
Estimated portion of rent expense
   representing interest                     41       38     37      38      34
Amortization of capitalized interest         12       12     17      13      13
Distributed income of equity investees        1        4      3
                                         ------   ------   ----   -----   -----
Adjusted income from continuing
   operations before income taxes        $1,194   $1,158   $921   $ 647   $ 556
                                         ======   ======   ====   =====   =====
Fixed charges
Interest expensed                        $  139   $  109   $ 88   $  93   $ 110
Interest capitalized                         14       13      7       7       8
Amortization of debt issue costs              1        1      1       2       2
Estimated portion of rent expense
   representing interest                     41       38     38      38      34
                                         ------   ------   ----   -----   -----
Total fixed charges                      $  195   $  161   $134   $ 140   $ 154
                                         ======   ======   ====   =====   =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         6.12     7.19   6.87    4.62    3.61
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert C. Stempel, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Energy Conversion
  Devices, Inc.;

  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.



  Date: September 13, 2004                     /s/ Robert C. Stempel
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert C. Stempel
                                               Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0372

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRYCE CALEB HAMERNICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 17, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 13 2022

01/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0372
#### In the Matter of D.B.-P, a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 502]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about July 6, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted gang assault in the first degree, attempted assault in the first and second degrees, assault in the second and third degrees, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, menacing in the second degree, and also committed the *513act of unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Although only one of three witnesses was able to make an identification, that identification was reliable, and the surrounding circumstances tended to corroborate it.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
No. 10-455.

#### Rory M. Walsh, Petitioner v. Robert Krantz, et al.

562 U.S. 1092, 131 S. Ct. 801,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9512,

178 L. Ed. 2d 532,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 334.
No. 10-7045.

#### Hanoi Barbaro Acosta, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 619,

178 L. Ed. 2d 449,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8971.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 620.
# CFC Agency Fair held on Susquehanna installation

/ Published Nov. 17, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
In addition to donating to a favorite non-profit, the Combined Federal Campaign provides an opportunity for Federal employees to learn about other local charities and the services they provide.  As it often happens, making a personal connection to a charity leads to a mutually benefiting, long-term relationship.  To educate employees and make those connections, an agency fair was held at Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna, Nov. 5.

The fair featured trained service dogs who took shifts making those all-important connections.   Ajax and Prague were such attention grabbers that other agencies representatives joked that they should have also brought soft, fuzzy companions.   Undoubtedly, all the representatives were eager to share their information; a food bank, family shelter, and crisis helpline were among the other participants.  With funding getting harder to obtain, they appreciate any opportunity to gain both supporters and volunteers. 

During the fair, employees were encouraged to donate to their favorite charity from any of the thousands of local, federal and international groups listed with CFC.  Having laptops accessible at the fair was a convenience, offering a way for employees to pledge online through myPay CFC.  

CFC keyworkers Nichole Foster and Dominque Chenault initially helped donors search for charity codes before starting the donation process.  Some had never used myPay prior to the fair, so the experience was a benefit all around.  Foster and Chenault found the search site to be user friendly for donors, and it was the donors who made the fair fun.

The installation will host another CFC fair Nov. 17 from 9:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. in the Building 81 lobby, and from 12:30 P.M. to 2:00 P.M. in the Building 750 employee breakroom. 

To find your favorite charity in CFC please visit: http://www.cfctoday.org/who-is-in-the-campaign.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ismael Ortiz, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 593]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about January 22, 2002, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. McMahon, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON                       
|Thomas R. McMahon                           
|Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
|August 14, 2008                             



21
# USTRANSCOM leader visits Troop Support to strengthen DLA partnership

/ Published Aug. 12, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 
The senior enlisted leader of the U.S. Transportation Command made his first visit to Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Aug. 10 to strengthen the relationship between the two organizations.

Air Force Chief Master Sgt. Matthew Caruso was joined by Army Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin, DLA senior enlisted leader, during the visit that included a trip to the Federal Correctional Institution at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey.

Tobin said it was important that Caruso see military uniforms made at the joint base's FCI.

"There's nothing more valuable than a face-to-face-engagement, " Tobin said. "He sees first-hand how the uniforms get made and relate that to the troopers."

Caruso said that seeing the Clothing and Textiles supply chain's flag room was important to him on a personal level as an enlisted warfighter.

"It was very moving to me, because we are the flag bearers," Caruso said. "We represent the standards and discipline that the offices of those flags represent. So it meant a lot to me to see where it gets created."

Caruso was also briefed by each of Troop Support's five supply chains. He said that he'll take what he learned and relay it to his team at USTRANSCOM.

"We've got to keep the relationships strong," Caruso said. "If we find ourselves going to the next crisis around the world, we can't create relationships after the crises have occurred. We've got to have prior ties like we have now. That's the biggest takeaway for me."

USTRANSCOM is a unified combatant command that supports the Defense Department and other government agencies by moving, and managing the movement of, personnel and materiel. USTRANSCOM delivers the DLA-provided materiel to warfighters around the world by land, air and sea.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0257. VERLETTE GREEN v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND

SOCIETY.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, Verlette Green appealed to the superior court. The superior court

entered a writ of possession in favor of Wilmington Savings Fund Society. Green

then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower

courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary

appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (punctuation

omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Green did not follow the proper

procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/06/2016

October 06, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1709 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1709

 To suspend temporarily the duty on mounted closed circuit television 
                                lenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Mr. Wofford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on mounted closed circuit television 
                                lenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOUNTED CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION LENSES.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

       ``  9902.90.02   Mounted lenses consisting of             No change      No change      On or before     
                         lenses suitable for use in,                                            12/31/96      ''
                         and presented separately                                                             . 
                         from, closed circuit                                                                   
                         television cameras, with or                                                            
                         without attached electrical                                                            
                         or non-electrical closed                                                               
                         circuit television camera                                                              
                         connectors, and with or                                                                
                         without attached motors                                                                
                         (provided for in subheading                                                            
                         9002.11.80, 9002.90.90, or                                                             
                         8529.90.30).................  Free                                                     

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```