alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tips From Former Smokers Tips 2020/TV

Denise and Brian/TV “Denise and Brian Time Together” :30

The spot opens on the A Tip From A Former Smoker’s Wife logo, and then cuts to a shot of Denise 

helping Brian into their car.

We then see them walking together into a doctor’s office, Denise sitting alone filling out paperwork, 

and a medical scan of lungs.

DENISE: If your husband gets cancer from smoking,

We see Denise and Brian walking out of their house.

DENISE: be prepared to spend a lot of time together.

The spot cuts to Denise reading credit card information to the receptionist while Brian sits in the 

waiting room.

DENISE: ...88179

The spot cuts to another shot of a medical scan and Denise sitting waiting for Brian at a doctor’s 

appointment.

DENISE: Just not the way either of you imagined.

The spot cuts to Denise helping Brian out of their car. We then see Denise give Brian pills in a waiting 

room. 

Finally, we see Denise sitting alone in the waiting room while Brian is being seen by a doctor.

The spot cuts to an art card that reads “ The people you love are worth quitting for.”

ANNCR: The people you love are worth quitting for.

ART CARD: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS.

 CDC LOGO

 SPONSORED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

 #CDCTIPS

ANNCR: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS.
No. 10-5427.

#### James Edward Lee, Petitioner v. Patty Ishee, et al.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 853,

178 L. Ed. 2d 583,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9628.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295, 178 L. Ed. 2d 193, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7314.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16536]



[[Page 33919]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-17-003]


Dauphin Island Gathering Partners; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 11, 1998, Dauphin Island Gathering 
Partners (DIGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective June 
12, 1998:

Third Revised Sheet No. 9

    DIGP states that the purpose of this filing is to report the name 
and rate of persons that DIGP expects to begin receiving service at 
negotiated rates on June 12, 1998.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16536 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-7806.

#### Bryan Laurienti, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1161, 131 S. Ct. 969,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 242.

178 L. Ed. 2d 797,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 530.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stanford R. Ovshinsky, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Energy Conversion
  Devices, Inc.

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.



October 22, 2003                               /s/ Stanford R. Ovshinsky
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                        142
No. 10-462.

#### Municipality of Aguada, Puerto Rico, Petitioner v. Maritza Acevedo-Orama, et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 665,

178 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9440.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 261.
# C_2014085EN.01002603.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/26

---

Action brought on 27 November 2013 — ZZ v ENISA

(Case F-112/13)

2014/C 85/45

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of ENISA’s executive director to terminate the applicant’s open-ended employment contract.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative claim and all other earlier unlawful acts, including the act by which ENISA dismissed the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative claim and all other earlier unlawful acts, including the act by which ENISA dismissed the applicant;

| — | Order payment to the applicant of the sum of EUR 50 000 in compensation for the non-pecuniary harm suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order payment to the applicant of the sum of EUR 50 000 in compensation for the non-pecuniary harm suffered;

| — | Order ENISA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order ENISA to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Dynatech Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 2-78465, 2-81026, 2-82260, 2-85387,
2-86457, 2-92391, 2-94757, 33-365, 33-2387, 33-5544, 33-17169, 33-24058,
33-30610, and 33-62551) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-87779, 33-10465, 33-17243,
33-42427, 33-50768, 33-57491, 33-57495, 333-01639, and 333-16461) of our reports
dated May 1, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Dynatech Corporation as of March 31, 1997 and
1996 and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended March 31, 1997,
which reports have been incorporated by reference or included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Boston, Massachusetts
June 18, 1997
No. 10-260.

#### Stephen G. Mattis, Petitioner v. New Jersey, et al.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 478,

178 L. Ed. 2d 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7978.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2580

DALLAS B. LANIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-285-5-BO)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dallas B. Lanier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on July 11, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 18, 1996. Appellant's

failure to note a timely appeal or obtain either an extension or a

reopening of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-10982.

#### Leon Douglas, Petitioner v. Michigan.

562 U.S. 1087, 131 S. Ct. 690,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9326.

178 L. Ed. 2d 520,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 858, 131 S. Ct. 128, 178 L. Ed. 2d 77, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6405.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.CSection 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of NIC Inc. (the “Company) each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 7, 2007   |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| /s/ Jeffery S. Fraser     |   |
| Jeffery S. Fraser         |
| Chairman of the Board and |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
|                      |
| /s/ Stephen M. Kovzan     |   |
| Stephen M. Kovzan         |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
|                           |  |  |

 

----
No. 10-5501.

#### Kerry McNeil, Petitioner v. David DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 984,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 308.

178 L. Ed. 2d 812,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 310, 178 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7318.
No. 10-7148.

#### Jason Gold, Petitioner v. Linda Schuette.

562 U.S. 1146, 131 S. Ct. 921,

178 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 334.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-790.

#### Angelo Brandao, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1181, 131 S. Ct. 1027,

178 L. Ed. 2d 830,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 795.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35206-35207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-621-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 23, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 16, 1998, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 
14203, filed in Docket No. CP98-621-000 a request

[[Page 35207]]

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for 
authorization to relocate sales tap facilities used to render service 
to an existing firm transportation customer, National Fuel Gas 
Distribution Corporation (Distribution), located in Elk County, 
Pennsylvania, under National Fuel's blanket certificate issued in 
Docket No. CP83-4-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    National Fuel proposes to relocate an existing sales tap, 
designated as Station T-No. 1374, utilized for transportation service 
for Distribution, located in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania. National 
Fuel states that the new station will be located in Elk County, 
Pennsylvania, approximately three miles east of the existing station, 
which will be moved in its entirety. National Fuel declares that it is 
necessary to relocate Station T-No. 1374 because the line it is 
currently located on, Line F-97(S), is in a deteriorated condition and 
is scheduled for abandonment. National Fuel asserts that it will submit 
an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Commission's Regulations 
in the near future with regard to Line F-97(S).
    National Fuel declares that it anticipates the flow at the new 
station, also designated Station T-1374, will be 1,953 Mcf per day with 
a maximum capacity estimated to be 4,583 Mcf per day. National Fuel 
states the cost of relocating this station is estimated to be $125,000.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest if filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17190 Filed -26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 1996 10K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         87
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,965
<PP&E>                                           5,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,712
<BONDS>                                          2,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,712
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,010
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     65
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 38
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04<F3>
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
<F3>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7310.

#### Jonathan Terrell Bernard, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 683,

178 L. Ed. 2d 507,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9365.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 801.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36270-36271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management; Renewals

    The NSF management officials having responsibility for the 29 
advisory committees listed below have determined that renewing these 
groups for another two years is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, 
National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 USC 1861 et seq. This 
determination follows consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.

1. Special Emphasis Panel in Graduate Education
2. Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary & Informal Education
3. Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences
4. Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers
5. Advisory Committee for Computer & Information Science & Engineering
6. Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
7. Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science & Engineering
8. Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Computational Infrastructure & 
Research
9. Special Emphasis Panel in Astronomical Sciences
10. Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering & Environmental Systems
11. Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical & Transport Systems
12. Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry
13. Special Emphasis Panel in Computing--Communications Research
14. Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative Activities
15. Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture & Innovation
16. Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical & Communications Systems
17. Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental Programs to Stimulate 
Competitive Research
18. Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development
19. Special Emphasis Panel in Information & Intelligent Systems
20. Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research
21. Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences
22. Special Emphasis Panel in Civil & Mechanical Systems
23. Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking Infrastructure & 
Research
24. Special Emphasis Panel in Physics
25. Special Emphasis Panel in Polar Programs
26. Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation & Communication
27. Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education
28. Special Emphasis Panel in Educational System Reform
29. Advisory Panel for Biomolecular Processes

    Authority for these Committees will expire on June 30, 2000, unless 
they are

[[Page 36271]]

renewed. For more information, please contact Rebecca Winker, NSF, at 
(702) 306-1185.

    Dated: June 29, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17612 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M