alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Nivek A.S. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Juanita S., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[48 NYS3d 662]

Order of fact-finding, Family Court, New York County (Stewart H. Weinstein, J.), entered on or about January 21, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, determined, after a hearing, that respondent mother had neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]), and the court’s credibility determinations are entitled to deference *(Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975]; *Matter of Brianna R. [Maribel R.],*115 AD3d 403, 408 [1st Dept 2014]).

The chronic poor hygiene of the children is well documented in the record and demonstrated that the children were at imminent risk of impairment *(see Matter of Naqi T [Marlena S.],*129 AD3d 444, 444-445 [1st Dept 2015]; *Matter of Inbunique V.,*22 AD3d 412, 413 [1st Dept 2005]). The mother also medically neglected one child’s severe eczema, which resulted in a three-day hospitalization *(see Matter of Sahairah J. [Rosemarie*
      *460R.], 135 AD3d 452, 453 [1st Dept 2016]; *Matter of Khelia B.,*298 AD2d 132, 132 [1st Dept 2002]). In addition, two of the children had excessive absences from school and were excessively tardy, which detrimentally affected their education and contributed to poor grades *(see Matter of Jonathan M. [Gilda L.],*139 AD3d 438, 438-439 [1st Dept 2016]). The mother also prohibited one of the children from attending a school-recommended evaluation *(see Matter of Kiera R. [Kinyetta*R.], 99 AD3d 565, 565 [1st Dept 2012]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erik D. Ferguson, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 900]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J., at plea; Ozzi, J., at sentence), rendered September 2, 2015, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. As*722signed counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.

Ordered that the motion of Paul Skip Laisure for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the defendant’s new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq., The Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street-5th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is directed to turn over a certified transcript of the proceeding to the defendant’s new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the defendant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 24, 2016, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

While we are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel, upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that there are nonfrivolous issues in this case, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the purported waiver of the defendant’s right to appeal was valid *(see People v Moyett,*7 NY3d 892 [2006]; *People v Billingslea,*6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; *People v Taylor,*132 AD3d 915 [2015]; *People v Avendano,*119 AD3d 597, 598 [2014]) and, if such waiver is found to be invalid, whether the sentence imposed was excessive *(see generally People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted *(see People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633, 636 [2001]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Miller, J.P., Duffy, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6994.

#### Jerry James Bias, Petitioner v. Alabama.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 912,

178 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 227.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 77 So. 3d 632.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have
issued our reports dated March 13, 2008, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
Annual Report of Dynamics Research Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said reports in the Registration Statements of Dynamics Research Corporation on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-109973, effective October 24, 2003, File No.
333-59706, effective April 27, 2001, File No. 333-47838, effective October
12, 2000, File No. 333-02805, effective April 24, 1996 and File
No. 333-68548, effective September 9, 1993).
 
 /s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
 
 Boston,
Massachusetts
 March 13,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. FE C&E 98-04--Certification Notice--159]


Office of Fossil Energy; Androscoggin Energy LLC Notice of Filing 
of Coal Capability Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 4, 1998, Androscoggin Energy LLC submitted a coal 
capability self-certification pursuant to section 201 of the Powerplant 
and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, as amended.

ADDRESSES: Copies of self-certification filings are available for 
public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Coal & Power Im/Ex, 
Fossil Energy, Room 4G-039, FE-27, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell at (202) 586-9624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of the Powerplant and Industrial 
Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.), 
provides that no new baseload electric powerplant may be constructed or 
operated without the capability to use coal or another alternate fuel 
as a primary energy source. In order to meet the requirement of coal 
capability, the owner or operator of such facilities proposing to use 
natural gas or petroleum as its primary energy source shall certify, 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d), to the Secretary of Energy prior to 
construction, or prior to operation as a base load powerplant, that 
such powerplant has the capability to use coal or another alternate 
fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with section 201(a) as 
of the date filed with the Department of Energy. The Secretary is 
required to publish a notice in the Federal Register that a 
certification has been filed. The following owner/operator of the 
proposed new baseload powerplant has filed a self-certification in 
acccordance with section 201(d).
    Owner: Androscoggin Energy LLC.
    Operator: Polsky Services, Inc.
    Location: Riley Road, near the city of Jay, Maine.
    Plant Configuration: Combined-Cycle, Cogeneration.
    Capacity: 145 megawatts.
    Fuel: Natural gas.
    Purchasing Entities: Retail and wholesale markets connected to New 
England Power Pool.
    In-Service Date: Mid to late 1999.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., June 19, 1998.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Electric Power Regulation, Office of Coal & Power Im/Ex, 
Office of Coal & Power Systems, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 98-16947 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         333,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               634,593
<PP&E>                                         272,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 228,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 730,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,821
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,632,998
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,936,798)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   730,021
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,802
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (164,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (164,263)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (164,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (164,263)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7583.

#### James Lyle Herron, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1155, 131 S. Ct. 951,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 116.

178 L. Ed. 2d 785,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 913.
# C_2013178EN.01001102.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/11

---

Action brought on 12 April 2013 — Olive Line International v OHIM (OLIVE LINE)

(Case T-209/13)

2013/C 178/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Olive Line International, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 1447/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 1447/2012-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a green quadrangular bottle including the words ‘OLIVE LINE’ for goods in Class 29 — International registration no 1 088 753 designating the European Community

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

___________________

**FORM 10-K/A**

**Amendment No. 1**

     For the fiscal year ended                      June 30, 2005                                                 
OR 

 

 

      

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

    For the transition period from __________________ to ___________________.

Commission file number:   1-8403    
ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC.
No. 10-6858.

#### Juan A. Trevino, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 582,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8689.

178 L. Ed. 2d 424,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-464.

#### Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc., Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 665,

178 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9187,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 406.
### tnGustrlal Sites 

### Controlled by 

### Others [X] C81- entfre,pap
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 989]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Artesyn Technologies 
(Inc.) (Electric Power Supplies), Broomfield, Colorado

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the FTZ Act), 
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the City and County of Denver, 
Colorado, grantee of FTZ 123, for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status for the electric power supply manufacturing 
plant of Artesyn Technologies (Inc.)(formerly, Zytec Corporation), in 
Broomfield, Colorado, was filed by the Board on August 22, 1997, and 
notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (FTZ 
Docket 69-97, 62 FR 45794, 8-29-97); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the Artesyn Technologies (Inc.), plant in Broomfield, 
Colorado (Subzone 123B), at the location described in the application, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of 1998.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17447 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2013108EN.01003802.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/38

---

Action brought on 15 January 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-4/13)

2013/C 108/90

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision adopting the applicant’s staff report for the period from 1995 to 1997 and the claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Administrative Secretary-General of the European External Action Service of 12 March 2012, adopting the staff report of the applicant for the period from 1995 to 1997; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Administrative Secretary-General of the European External Action Service of 12 March 2012, adopting the staff report of the applicant for the period from 1995 to 1997;

| — | insofar as it is necessary, annul the decision of the appointing authority of the Commission of 4 October 2012, rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on 20 June 2012 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

insofar as it is necessary, annul the decision of the appointing authority of the Commission of 4 October 2012, rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on 20 June 2012 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 25 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 25 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsEnergy

                        - DLA Newsroom
                        - Headquarters News
                        - Aviation News
                        - Disposition Services News
                        - Distribution News
                        - Energy News
                        - Land and Maritime News
                        - Troop Support News
                        - CENTCOM & SOCOM News
                        - Europe & Africa News
                        - Indo-Pacific News
                        - Featured News
                        - News Archive

**Energy Home**

Archive

2024 (33)2023 (76)2022 (73)2021 (83)2020 (89)2019 (132)2018 (123)2017 (66)2016 (48)2015 (44)

Search

# DLA Energy News

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Property disposal specialist killed in Bagram to be inducted into DLA Hall of Fame

By Beth Reece

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

People and CultureDLA valuesHall of FameKrissie DavisBagramWarfighter First
#### People v Goodson

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1515 (Genesee)

denied 3/13/17 (Rivera, J.)
# C_2013123EN.01002502.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/25

---

Action brought on 13 March 2013 — Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source v Commission

(Case T-147/13)

2013/C 123/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co. Ltd (Jiashan, China) (represented by: V. Akritidis and Y. Melin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission communicated by letter of 3 January 2013, No H4/JN/Ref.t13.000011, informing the applicant that it would not examine the applicant’s request to be granted the status of undertaking operating under market economy conditions, filed pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, in the antidumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components originating in the People’s Republic of China, opened on 6 September 2012 (AD 590); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission communicated by letter of 3 January 2013, No H4/JN/Ref.t13.000011, informing the applicant that it would not examine the applicant’s request to be granted the status of undertaking operating under market economy conditions, filed pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, in the antidumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components originating in the People’s Republic of China, opened on 6 September 2012 (AD 590);

| — | Declare inapplicable to the applicant as regards the present application, by virtue of Article 277 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2012 L 344, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare inapplicable to the applicant as regards the present application, by virtue of Article 277 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2012 L 344, p. 1);

| — | And, consequently, order the Commission and any interveners to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

And, consequently, order the Commission and any interveners to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law identical to that raised in Case T-143/13 Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology v Commission.

Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology

Commission

---