alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1












	
Number

	
 

	
Shares


	
 

	
THE GNS GROUP INC.

	
 


	
 

	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

	
 


	
 

	
750,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED,

	
 


	
 

	
NO PAR VALUE

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
CUSIP _______


	
 

	
 

	
SEE REVERSE


	
 

	
 

	
FOR


	
This certifies that

	
 

	
CERTAIN


	
is the owner of

	
 

	
DEFINITIONS


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE

	
 


	
 

	
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
THE GNS GROUP INC.

	
 


	
 

	
transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly

	
 


	
 

	
authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly

	
 


	
 

	
endorsed.  This certificate and the shares represented hereby

	
 


	
 

	
are subject to the laws of the State of Washington, and to the

	
 


	
 

	
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation,

	
 


	
 

	
as now or hereafter amended.  This certificate is not valid

	
 


	
 

	
unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.  WITNESS

	
 


	
 

	
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature

	
 


	
 

	
of its duly authorized officers

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
PRESIDENT

	
[SEAL]

	
SECRETARY




































The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.







	
TEN COM

	
as tenants in common

	
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT

	
 

	
Custodian

	
 


	
TEN ENT

	
as tenants by the entireties

	
 

	
(Cust)

	
 

	
(Minor)


	
JT TEN

	
as joint tenants with the right of

	
 

	
Act

	
 


	
 

	
survivorship and not as tenants

	
 

	
 

	
(State)


	
 

	
in common

	
 

	
 

	
 










Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.







	
For value received,

	
 

	
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


	
 

	
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

	
 


	
 

	
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

	
 


	
 


	
 


	
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


	
 


	
,


	
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the


premises.


	
 


	
Dated _______________________


	
 


	
X


	
THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN


EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.  THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE


GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions)




















SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:

















TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June 22, 1998.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Proposed amendments to the Voluntary Guide to Conduct for 
Federal Reserve System Officials.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: June 12, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-16198 Filed 6-12-98; 5:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

7 CFR Part 457


Dry Pea; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulation 
which was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, December 16, 
1997 (62 FR 65741-65747). The regulation pertains to the Dry Pea Crop 
Insurance Provisions.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arden Routh, Insurance Management 
Specialist, Research and Development, Product Development Division, 
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of 
Agriculture, 9435 Holmes Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, telephone (816) 
926-7730.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulation that is the subject of this correction was 
intended to provide policy changes to better meet the needs of the 
insured and include the pea crop insurance regulations with the Common 
Crop Insurance Policy for ease of use and consistency of terms.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulation contained an error which may 
prove misleading. The local market price definition was based on the 
cash price per pound for U.S. No. 2 grade of dry peas and is being 
corrected to be based on the cash price per pound for U.S. No. 1 grade 
of dry peas. Dry Pea production that is eligible for quality adjustment 
is based on production grading U.S. No. 2 or worse; therefore, any 
production not grading U.S. No. 1 is eligible for quality adjustment. 
The local market price must be based on the U.S. No. 1 grade rather 
than U.S. No. 2. The value of the damaged or conditioned production is 
divided by the local market price (based on U.S. No. 1 grade) to 
calculate the quality adjustment factor under section 12(e) of the crop 
provisions.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457

    Crop insurance, Dry pea.

    Accordingly, 7 CFR part 457 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS; REGULATIONS FOR THE 
1998 AND SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT YEARS

    1. The authority citation for part 457 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p).


Sec. 457.140  [Corrected]

    2. In Sec. 457.140, section 1 of the policy pertaining to the 
definition of ``Local market price'' is corrected by removing the 
phrase ``U.S. No. 2'', in the first and second sentences, and replacing 
it with ``U.S. No. 1''.

    Signed in Washington D.C., on June 26, 1998.
Joy Harwood,
Acting Manager, Federalf Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 98-17637 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2580-000]


HDI Associates III; Notice of Withdrawal

June 25, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 22, 1998, HDI Associates III tendered for 
filing Notice of Withdrawal of its filing made on April 17, 1998, in 
Docket No. ER98-2580-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 216 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.216). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before July 7, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17494 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.3

                                    CONFIRMATION

TO: MICHAEL GREEN

         This is to confirm renewal of the employment agreement made as of
October 1, 2000, for a further one year period commencing on October 1, 2004,
and ending on September 30, 2005, under the same terms and conditions,
including, the terms relating to compensation.

         Dated at Markham this 1st day of October, 2004


         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.


         Per: /s/ Michael Green
              -------------------------
              Michael Green - President
#### Com. v. Jimenez 14

05/10/2016

913 MAL (2015)

14

.Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 477
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration
[Document Identifier: HCFA-379]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information. Interested persons are 
invited to send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including any of the 
following subjects: (1) the necessity and utility of the proposed 
information collection for the proper performance of the agency's 
functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection 
burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently 
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: The Financial 
Statement of Debtor and Supporting Regulation 42 CFR 405.376; Form No.: 
HCFA-379, OMB #0938-0270; Use: This form is used to collect financial 
information which is needed to evaluate requests from physician/
suppliers to pay indebtness under extended repayment schedule, or to 
compromise a debt for less than the full amount. Frequency: As needed; 
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions; Number of Respondents: 500; Total Annual Responses: 500; 
Total Annual Hours: 1,000.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement for the proposed 
paperwork collections referenced above, E-mail your request, including 
your address and phone number, to P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f4e5f4a5d58405d446f474c494e01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27465742555048554c674f44414609404851">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the 
Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be mailed 
within 30 days of this notice directly to the OMB Desk Officer 
designated at the following address: OMB Human Resources and Housing 
Branch, Attention: Allison Eydt, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: June 18, 1998.
John P. Burke III,
HCFA Reports Clearance Officer, HCFA, Office of Information Services, 
Information Technology Investment Management Group, Division of HCFA 
Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 98-17557 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Susquehanna military help a local veteran in need

/ Published Nov. 13, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Assisting Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Harrisburg Area, several military members stationed at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., along with others from Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna, helped rehab a home in a unique way – by veterans for a veteran.

The team came together in the spirit of community, working throughout the morning to repair the roof, reframe windows, repair a stairway, and install a dryer vent at the home.

“This was a chance for my co-workers and me to give back to those in need,” says Army Staff Sgt. Davis Lewis, a parachute rigger assigned to DLA Distribution Susquehanna.  “We hope to inspire others around us to do the same.”

The event was part of “Make a Difference Day,” which is a day for millions of volunteers across the nation to unite with a common mission – to improve the lives of others.  This year marked the 24th year of the project, and is the largest national day of community service.

Lewis, an active community volunteer in the Susquehanna region, says “We definitely plan to help out with future projects.”
No. 10-7170.

#### Ricardo Morgutia, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1075, 131 S. Ct. 675,

178 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9246.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 703.
# C_2014031EN.01002202.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/22

---

Action brought on 20 November 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-111/13)

2014/C 31/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the EPSO decision not to admit the applicant to the selection phase of Competition EPSO/AD/231/12 (AD7) and to reclassify him Competition EPSO/AD/230/12 (AD5) and of the decision to enter him on the reserve list for the abovementioned AD5 competition, as well as damages for non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the act of 16.7.2012, the act of 3.9.2012, 3.12.2012 the act of 13.2.2013, the act of 15.3.2013 and, in so far as necessary, the acts dismissing the applicant’s claims of 21.8.2013 and 2.10.2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the act of 16.7.2012, the act of 3.9.2012, 3.12.2012 the act of 13.2.2013, the act of 15.3.2013 and, in so far as necessary, the acts dismissing the applicant’s claims of 21.8.2013 and 2.10.2013;

| — | order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of EUR 300 580; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of EUR 300 580;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
WILLIAM L. OWEN S 21sT DISTRICT, New YORK COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON D EFENSE SUBCOMMITIEE ON HOMELAND SECUAITV

### .~**c.: .** **"€\~~~/{**

# ~~~~ 

# (!Congre5'5' of tbe**~niteb ~tate5'**  j!}ou%e of l\epre%cntatil:les

'([mnsbington, 

### 13Q: 20515 March 25, 20 14 The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary, U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. Secretary: PLEASE RESPOND TO WASHINGTON OFFICE 0 405 CAN"ON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHI,.GTO

.... DC 20515 (202) 225-461 1 DISTRICT OFFICE o D 120 WASH I NGTON STREET, Su 1 TE 200 WATERTOWN, NY 13601 (3 1 5) 782-3150 D 14 DuRKH STREET. Sum 320 PLATTSBURGH, NY 12901 (518) 563-1406 0 136 GLEN STREET GLENS FALLS, NY 12801 (518) 743-0964

I write to express deep concern over the application before your Department by Norwegian Air International Limited (NAI) to operate into the U.S. as a foreign air can·ier. Approval ofthis application would not be in the public interest. The NAI application proposes a gl obal outsourcing business that will put U

.S

. airlines and their employees at a competitive disadvantage. Indeed, this airline bearing the name "Norwegian" describes itself in the application as "a foreign carrier of Ireland

." NAI's application provides little information about itself or its plans, but it appears to be in the same corporate family with another carrier , a rapidlygrowing low

-cost airline, Norwegian Air Shuttle (NAS). For one thing, the CEO ofNAI, named in the application as Asgeir Nyseth, is the ChiefOperating Officer ofNAS. For another, NAI is seeking an operating license from Irish aviation authorities, a step that NAS previously signaled it would take. NAS has stated that to conduct its new long-haul operations it will seek to register its aircraft and receive an air operator's certificate from a European Union country whose labor laws will allow outsourcing ofaircrew beyond the EU. NAS/NAI has chosen Ireland and stated that it plans to operate this Irish subsidiary-registered aircraft to fly from Norway and other EU points to the United States. These flights will be operated by outsourced lower-wage aircrew, based in Southeast Asia, under individual employment contracts governed by Singapore law. It is clear that NAS intends to use NAI as its Irish affiliate to bring its plan to fruition. This business model is designed expressly to undermine fair wages and working conditions. It would also put U.S. carriers who have to compete against it at a competitive disadvantage. Finally, approval ofNAI's application for authority would be inconsistent with the Congressionally-established public interest as set f01th in the aviation statutes and runs afoul ofthe current EU-U.S. Air Transpo1t Agreement. I hope you will reject this misguided application and thank you for your consideration of this critical matter.



# s 10-140331-014 BILL OWENS Member ofCongress

PRINT ED ON RECYCLED PAPER
No. 10-6220.

#### Josiah E. Smith, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 1012, 131 S. Ct. 526,

178 L. Ed. 2d 387,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8630.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 672.
No. 10-5638.

#### Vivian Ann Burnett, Petitioner v. City of Jacksonville, Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 330,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7272.

178 L. Ed. 2d 215,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 905.
#### People v Mayhand

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1616 (Monroe)

denied 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

273 CA 09-01153
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES HIGH, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DAVISON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas M. Van Strydonck, J.), entered April 2, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. The order committed respondent to a secure treatment facility.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order determining that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10 and committing him to a secure treatment facility. We conclude that petitioner met its burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that respondent suffers from a mental abnormality ( see Matter of State of New York v Farnsworth , 75 AD3d 14, 29-30, appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 848; see generally § 10.03 [i]). We further conclude that the jury’s determination with respect to the issue of mental abnormality is entitled to great deference because the jury had the best opportunity to evaluate the weight and credibility of conflicting expert testimony ( see Matter of State of New York v Donald N ., 63 AD3d 1391, 1394). Petitioner also established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent has such an inability to control his behavior that he “is likely to be a danger to others and to commit sex offenses if not confined” (§ 10.07 [f]). Thus, it cannot be said that Supreme Court erred in determining that respondent required confinement and should be committed to a secure treatment facility ( see id. ). Respondent’s contention that the court erred in permitting testimony during the disposition hearing with respect to the use of the STATIC-99 tool is not preserved for our review ( see generally CPLR 4017; CPLR 5501 [a] [3]) and, in any event, his challenge to that testimony goes to the weight thereof rather than its admissibility ( see Matter of State of New York v Fox , 79 AD3d 1782,-2- 273 CA 09-01153

1784; see also Matter of State of New York v Timothy JJ. , 70 AD3d 1138, 1140-1142).

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
No. 10-6834.

#### Joseph Ray Beilharz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 580,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8787.

178 L. Ed. 2d 423,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*424Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 363.
Exhibit No. 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|/s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider
Chief Financial Officer
July 9, 2004 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
#### People v McCall

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1769

denied