alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DSCR emergency response exercise takes place May 24 

/ Published May 18, 2016
RICHMOND, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond and DLA Aviation will conduct an active shooter emergency response exercise on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, May 24. DLA Police and Fire and Emergency Services officials will participate in the exercise.******

The purpose of the event is to make sure all DLA and tenant employees, as well as first responders, are ready to react if or when incidents and emergencies occur on DSCR.

“This exercise will evaluate the responses of the police and F&EMS to an active shooter based on their capabilities, provide the DSCR workforce and participant employees an opportunity to experience and respond to an active shooter, and provide the Emergency Operations Center with a challenging event that requires installation-level communication and support,” said William Bullock, emergency manager, DLA Installation Support at Richmond, Security and Emergency Services.

Employees will participate in the exercise by following “Run.Hide.Fight.” procedures. “Run. Hide. Fight.” is a survival tactic used in active shooter situations.  Security and Emergency Services conducted four Active Shooter training classes in April and earlier this month to teach employees how to react and employ tactics for survival.

During the exercise, employees and our neighbors from the communities surrounding the installation will hear air horns, the Giant Voice emergency notification system announcements, as well as multiple police, fire and emergency services and sirens in the vicinity of Building 32.  Blank gun shots will be used in this exercise, anticipate hearing simulated gun shots within this area.

Employees will also receive announcements, messages and alerts through internal building speakers, and the AtHoc mass notification system.

“As we have seen in recent months and years, there are no boundaries or limitations to the violence an active shooter will go to cause death and suffering in general. The need for these concerns in a military installation environment is evident by the active shooter incidents that have occurred at Washington Navy Yard (District of Columbia), Chattanooga (Tennessee), Fort Hood (Texas), Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston (Texas), Fort Lee (Virginia), and Norfolk (Virginia),” said Bullock.

“Should an active shooter appear on DSCR, it is imperative that our workforce has maximized every opportunity to train and exercise their training to react timely and decisively. Preparation and knowledge will provide employees with confidence in responding to critical incidents. An employee's insufficient action or inappropriate reaction could and will determine whether their families, their fellow workers and they suffer unnecessarily,” said Bullock.
# Galbraith, force behind critical distribution system, joins DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published Sept. 15, 2016
# Attachment 1

Cape Fear Water Balance DiagramCape Fear Steam Electric PlantWater Flow Line DrawingStormCoalWaterRiverCoolingH20Septic &StormwaterWest Ash PondOverflowCape Fear RiverOutfall 001IntakeAshOutfall 005East Ash PondOutfall 003Cape Fear River CanalEvaporationOutfall 007From Condensate Storage TankWaste OilExhaust GasRiverTo LVRBCoolingH20Coal PilePlant Sump&PumpingStationReverse Osmosisthen ElectrodeDeionizerBoilersPumpingStationLow VolumeRetentionBasin (LVRB)with O/WSeparatorSteam TurbinesCondensersCondensateStorage TankFilter PlantCoolingTowerEquipmentCoolingOilyWasteTankCombustionTurbinesFalse StartDrain TanksHeatRecoverySteamGeneratorSteam TurbinesCondensers

# Attachment 2

Cape Fear Groundwater Monitoring Reports – March 2007, December 2007, April 2008,

December 2008, and June 2009
No. 10-392.

#### Dodie Junkert, Petitioner v. Roger W. Massey.

562 U.S. 1063, 131 S. Ct. 653,

178 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9046.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 364.
No. 10-6682.

#### Malcolm Charles Hartzog, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 541,

178 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8332.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### People v Martinez

App Div, 1st Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 80797(U) (NY)

dismissed 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
# “Show Some Love” theme echoed during DSCR kick-off for Combined Federal Campaign

/ Published Oct. 7, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day hosted the annual Combined Federal Campaign kicked-off Oct. 4, in the Lott’s Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

 Day welcomed DSCR employees as well as special guests Victoria Adams, managing director of the Campaign Administration for Global Impact, who also leads the strategic planning and implementation of CFC campaigns in the National Capital Area, overseas, New York City and Central Virginia. Day also welcomed Alison Faulk, customer services manager and customers advocate at McGuire VA Medical Center in Richmond, who is serving as the 2016 CFC Loaned Executive and will assist the DLA Aviation campaign managers with the campaign.

 Day recognized the Central Virginia CFC 2016 Local Federal Coordinating Committee, campaign managers and the keyworkers. 

 The guest speakers for the event were: Kate Lawton, from “The Doorways”, a community outreach service to house and feed homeless; Holly Graf, ambassador for ShelterBox USA, an organization that supplies temporary homes for global disaster victims; and Wayne Swatlowski from Project Homes, an organization that assists citizens who need help with quality of life home improvements.

“Since the installation’s first campaign in 1967, we have exceeded our goal almost every year and you are the reason we have been so successful,” said Day.

 “Through good and bad economic times, DSCR employees have stepped up and helped their fellow co-workers, neighbors, and community members, through many of the 50 local charitable organizations, of which some are here today,” said Day. “This year’s theme is “Show Some Love” and our goal is to raise $309,430.” 

“We have an excellent opportunity to make a positive impact. Remember, just as we support our warfighters in our daily jobs, we have an opportunity here to answer the call to help others,” said Day.“You probably know folks that have had a rough year and there are folks who need our help right here in Central Virginia. I think what it really takes is a decision ... a decision to take part in helping your community,” said Day.

Last year federal employees pledged almost $732,000 to the Central Virginia CFC. Day added, of that total, more than $269,000 was donated to our local area charities, making a direct positive impact on our communities here in the Metro Richmond area.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Jeffrey A. LudrofDate: August 12, 2005
    
    Jeffrey A. Ludrof, President & CEO
 77
No. 10-7025.

#### Nathaniel Jackson, Petitioner v. Randall Workman, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 669,

178 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9149.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 724.
# C_2015146EN.01003602.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2015 — Naazneen Investments v OHIM — Energy Brands (SMART WATER)

(Case T-250/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark SMART WATER - Genuine use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 146/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Naazneen Investments Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and T. Melchert, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Energy Brands, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and D. Stone, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 February 2013 (Case R 1101/2011-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Energy Brands, Inc. and Naazneen Investments Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Naazneen Investments Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Naazneen Investments Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16631]



[[Page 34187]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Atlantic Overseas Express Inc., 2550 NW 72 Avenue, Suite 100, Miami, FL 
33122, Officers: Jorge E. Gomez, President, Lourdes Leon, Vice 
President

    Dated: June 17, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16631 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### People v Henriquez

App Div, 3d Dept: 2015 NY Slip Op 66066(U) (Chemung)

denied 8/5/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★
■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for  the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: April 1, 2011







/s/ John Williams
 John Williams
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  April 1, 2011








/s/ John D. Glassgow
 John D. Glassgow
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Yamil Miesesulerio, Defendant.

[53 NYS3d 561]

Application by the defendant for a writ of error coram nobis seeking leave to file a late notice of appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered August 28, 2014.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has not established his entitlement to the relief requested (see *People v Syville,*15 NY3d 391 [2010]).

Balkin, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,729
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,008
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,451
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,395
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,421
<LOANS>                                        176,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,474
<DEPOSITS>                                     201,176
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,647
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,719
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 231,474
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,268
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,058
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,676
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,002
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,796
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,660
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,342
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,539
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,539
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.05
<LOANS-NON>                                        711
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,203
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,573
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      243
<RECOVERIES>                                        59
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,539
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,539
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-5365.

#### Gerard D. Grandoit, Petitioner v. Benjamin J. Gilson, et al.

562 U.S. 1058, 131 S. Ct. 684,

178 L. Ed. 2d 474,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9194.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
# C_2015389EN.01004201.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2015 — Copernicus-Trademarks v OHIM (BLUECO)

(Case T-684/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark BLUECO - Prior Community word mark BLUECAR - Relative ground for refusal - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for alteration made by the intervener - Article 65(4) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 389/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd (Borehamwood, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Pechan and S. Körber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Bolloré SA (Érgue-Gaberic, France) (represented initially by: B. Fontaine, and subsequently by: O. Legrand, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2013 (Case R 2029/2012-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Bolloré SA and Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Rejects the application for alteration made by Bolloré SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rejects the application for alteration made by Bolloré SA;

| 3. | Orders Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
J. Allingham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By     /s/ DENNIS J. ALLINGHAM
   -----------------------------------
Dennis J. Allingham
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
September 23, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and will be retained by Lifecore
Biomedical, Inc., and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015127EN.01002202.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2015 — Bayer Intellectual Property v OHIM — Interhygiene (INTERFACE)

(Case T-227/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark INTERFACE - Earlier Community word mark Interfog - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Identity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 127/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Sanz Cerralbo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially, A. Schifko and, subsequently, D. Walicka, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Interhygiene GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2013 (Case R 1688/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Interhygiene GmbH and Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6761.

#### Rafael Fernandez-Roque, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 546,

178 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8411.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 617 F.3d 565.
No. 10-7158.

#### Alfred L. Stone, Petitioner v. Elizabeth Stenz, et al.

562 U.S. 1146, 131 S. Ct. 922,

178 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 448.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.