alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Board of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 Board of Director Compensation Fee Structure 
  
 Board Fees. 
  
 Each director shall receive the following annual fee: 
  

	 	1.	Retainer – $40,000 

  

	 	2.	Lead director – $20,000 supplement 

  
 Equity Compensation. 
  
 Each director shall receive the following equity grants: 
  

	 	1.	Non-qualified stock option grant – 10,000 shares (post-split) 

  

	 	2.	Deferred compensation incentive match – 15% of the Board retainer deferred 

  
 Committee Fees. 
  
 Each member of the following committees shall receive the following annual fees: 
  


	 	1.	Audit Committee – $9,000 per year, with supplement of $20,000 for the Committee chair 

  

	 	2.	Other Committees – $4,000 per year for each Committee, with supplement of $5,000 for the Compensation Committee chair 

  
 Meeting Fees. 
  
 Each director shall receive the following fees for each meeting attended: 
  

	 	1.	Board meetings – $2,000 per meeting if in person or $500 if by phone conference 

  

	 	2.	Committee meetings – $1,500 per meeting if in person or $500 if by phone conference 

  

	 	3.	Committee meeting supplements – if committee meeting lasts over 2 hours, increase of meeting fee to $2,500 ($3,000 for Committee Chairs) if in person or to $1,000 if by phone
conference 

  
 Effective Dates. 
  

	 	1.	Audit Committee retainer, increase from $4,000 to $9,000, effective as of January 1, 2004 

  

	 	2.	Lead director supplemental retainer, effective November 1, 2004 

  

	 	3.	Audit Committee chair supplemental retainer, increase from $5,000 to $20,000, effective November 1, 2004
# Request for proposal released for Eielson Air Force Base Micro-Reactor Pilot Program 

/ Published Sept. 26, 2022
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska , 
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska -- The Department of the Air Force, in partnership with the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, released a request for proposal for the Eielson Air Force Base Micro-Reactor Pilot Program today.

This is an important first step toward developing the next-generation energy technology needed for energy resilience at Eielson Air Force Base and to inform future initiatives to power national security infrastructure.  

Micro-reactors are small nuclear reactors that can produce clean energy and are equipped with built-in safety features that self-adjust to changing conditions and demands to prevent overheating. The technology’s ability to operate independently from the commercial grid and reduce greenhouse gas emissions make micro-reactors a promising power source for remote domestic military installations critical to the national security infrastructure.

“The release of the RFP for the Eielson AFB micro-reactor is a critical next step in furthering the development and deployment of reliable and clean energy technology at Department of the Air Force installations,” said Nancy Balkus, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Environment, Safety and Infrastructure. “This program is extremely important to mission assurance and sustainment in the face of climate change and continued national defense threats, and demonstrates the department’s commitment to ensuring our installations have a safe, reliable supply of energy, no matter their location.”

The Micro-Reactor Pilot Program was initiated in response to the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act requirement to construct and operate a micro-reactor by the end of 2027. The micro-reactor will be licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, but commercially owned and operated.

In conjunction with the release, the DAF is hosting a pre-proposal conference and site visit at Eielson Air Force Base Oct. 12. Interested parties intending to submit a proposal may attend the site visit, which will provide prospective offerors with information to prepare proposals.  Results of the pre-proposal conference will be documented and made available on the SAM.gov website. 

For more information about this project, check out our Fact Sheet and FAQs.

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment website.*
# C_2016007EN.01001801.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2015 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex (IRAP)

(Case T-253/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark IRAP - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 007/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Orthogen AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Finger and S. Krüger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by D. Walicka and A. Schifko, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Arthrex GmbH (Garching, Germany) (represented by: R. Greiffenberg and O. Stöckel, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2013 (Case R 382/2012-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Arthrex GmbH and Orthogen AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Orthogen AG to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by Arthrex GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Orthogen AG to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by Arthrex GmbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
Distribution Leaders participate in BYR2S 2019
 
  By Debra McBeath, Distribution Change Management Officer
No. 85-6252.

#### Brown *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
# C_2014339EN.01001702.xml

| 29.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/17

---

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2014 — Stance v OHIM — Pokarna (STANCE)

(Case T-206/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stance, Inc. (San Clemente, United States) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Pokarna Ltd (Secundrabad Andhra Pradesh, India)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 February 2013 (Case R 885/2012-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Pokarna Ltd and Stance, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1256

MICHAEL HODGES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KIARA HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ASHLEY K. TUNNER, Judge; J. BELL, Agent DCSE; PATRICIA R. BATLEY, 

Court Clerk,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00955-DJN)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Hodges, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hodges appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 

complaint as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim.*

 We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hodges v. Harris, No. 3:19-cv-00955-DJN (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2020 & Feb. 25, 2020). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, we have 

jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 611 (4th Cir. 

2020).
DAxSTM RC UA V 

advanced 

VT 0 L Copyright 2014 Drone America 

Proprietary and Confidential 

Drone Arnerica, 3555 Airway Drive suite 310, Reno, NV 8951 1 www.DroneArnerica.corn 

Tel: 775-473-9998 ext. 1 Fax: 775-624-34 16 Ernail: info@dronearnerica.corn 
Diameter 48-3/ 8 inches (1228mm) 

Height 8 inches (200mm) with retractable camera/ LG removed 

Airframe Construction CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer) 

Empty Weight 8.5lb (3,843 g) 

Take-offWeigbt 19. 7lb-21.1lb (9,000 g -9,500g) 

Max. Payload (With Parachute) 4.4lb (2,000g)• 

Max. Speed 28 mph ( 45 km/ h)• 

Climb Rate 15 mph (24km/ h)• 

Flight Height up to 3000 feet ( 900m) over ground under ideal conditions• 

Max. Alt. 9,500 feet ASL' 

Flight Time up to 39 min• 

Operating Temperature -4 to 104 F (-20 to 40C) 

Sensors Day / Night Camera, Atmospheric Sensors, Other .. 

Control RC, tablet-PC (optional), automatic way point flight 

Power Source lithium-polymer 10,000 mA- 25,000 mA 

• Depending on operating mode, penuissions, weather and payload 

•• Sensors can be customized based upon customer specific applications. 

Inquire for details. 

• Aerial imaging 

• Mapping at low altitude 

• Search and Rescue 

• First Response 

• Asset Protection 

• Surveillance 

• Reconnaissance 

• Disaster Relief 

• Anti- poaching Surveillance 

• Border Patrol for Homeland Security 

• Universities - Research 

• DEA and other Law Enforcement 

- ---=--- -.. - -. 

Simple control provided by intelegent 

software via ruggedized tablet PC. 

VT 0 L Copyright 2014 Drone Arnerica 

Proprie tary and Confidential 

Drone Arnerica, 3555 Airway Drive suite 3 10, Reno, NV 8951 1 vvvvvv.DroneArnerica.corn 

Tel: 775-473-9998 ext. 1 Fax: 775-624-3416 Ernail: info@dronearnerica.corn
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.4    
    


                                ,
           



	
	 
	
	 
	
	 




Re:  Polymer
Group, Inc. Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Option 


Dear
                : 


        Polymer
Group, Inc. (the "Company") is pleased to advise you that, pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan"), the Company's Compensation Committee has granted to you an option (the "Option") to acquire
shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), as set forth below (the
"Option Shares"), subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan:   



	 	Total Number of Option Shares	
	 
	 	Date of Grant	
	 
	 	Exercise Price per Option Share	
	 
	 	Expiration Date of All Options Shares	
	 




Vesting Schedule  



	 
	 	2004
	 	2005
	 	2006
	 	2007

	Service Vesting:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

Division Financial Performance	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

Corporate Financial Performance	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 





        The
Option is not intended to be an "incentive stock option" within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 


        The
Option is intended to confirm in all respects with, and is subject to all applicable provisions of, the Plan (which is incorporated herein by reference). Certain capitalized terms
used herein are defined in the Plan. Inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Plan shall be resolved in accordance with the terms of the Plan. All terms not specified herein shall be as set
forth in the Plan, including procedures for exercise and vesting. 



	

 	
 	

Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	

Polymer Group, Inc.
	

 	
 	

By:	

 
	

 	
 	

 	


	

 	
 	

 	

Name: 

	

 	
 	

 	

Title: 

	

 	
 	

 	

 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.4
No. 10-6149.

#### Robert T. Irvin, Petitioner v. City of Clarksville Police Department, et al.

562 U.S. 1010, 131 S. Ct. 519,

178 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8603.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bridget Best, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 5]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James M. Burke, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling was a proper exercise of discretion, which “weighed appropriate concerns and limited both the number of convictions and the scope of permissible cross-examination” *(People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203, 208 [2002]). The court permitted the prosecutor to cross-examine defendant about only one 2012 misdemeanor conviction and one 2004 *599felony conviction, limiting such cross-examination to the names of the offenses and the dates of conviction, and precluded any questioning about defendant’s several other convictions. The court properly permitted the prosecutor to elicit defendant’s use of five aliases and six false dates of birth. This deceitful conduct was highly probative of defendant’s credibility notwithstanding its remoteness in time and defendant’s age when this conduct occurred (see *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 459 [1994]).

Defendant failed to preserve her constitutional challenge to the *Sandoval*ruling, her argument that the People should not have been permitted to elicit that defendant was convicted of first-degree identity theft because she absconded while a charge of the same offense was pending against her in this bail jumping case, and her contention that the prosecutor compounded the prejudicial effect of the *Sandoval*ruling on cross-examination and summation. We decline to review these arguments in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find them unavailing.

We also find that any error concerning the *Sandoval*ruling was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237-238 [1975]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 10-6645.

#### Marvin Miller, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 538,

178 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8417.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 646.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-10029

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Waylon Calhoun, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-236-1

______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Waylon Calhoun

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calhoun has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 14, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-10029 Document: 53-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2024
No. 24-10029

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 24-10029 Document: 53-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2024
Custom apparatus ready to respond to fires and floods in Texas
 By Jeff Landenberger
  A military cargo truck declared excess now serves Texas’ Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire as a multi-purpose response vehicle thanks to the DOD Firefighter Property Program and Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services. A former military cargo truck that was turned into to DLA Disposition Services is now a multi-purpose response vehicle with the Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire Department in Texas.




A former military cargo truck painted red sits outside a tan building. The truck has no military markings but does have a water tank on its bed used to take water to fires.
        Truck
            A former military cargo truck that was turned into to DLA Disposition Services is now a multi-purpose response vehicle with the Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire Department in Texas.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire
                    
                    VIRIN: 230223-D-YU183-007The DOD FPP has cross-government benefits. Property transfer from DOD to federal recipients helps DLA Disposition Services find new uses for excess military equipment. It helps the U.S. Forest Service manage fire activity across the country by making the equipment available to state governments. State agencies benefit their local populations by issuing gear to rural fire departments to protect districts and counties. Pecan Grove FD Assistant Chief Billy Hoft said when his department received the truck, the crew immediately began customizing it for their needs. He explained how the truck will serve in a variety of ways. “We have a need for a high-water vehicle, as our aera is prone to flooding during hurricane season,” Hoft said. The department purchased a canvas top to cover the truck’s bed and create shelter for first responders and people they are transporting to safety during inclement weather. Then, during wildfire season, Hoft said the team would fit it with a water tank and use the truck to fight wildland blazes. Pecan Grove FD covers the densely populated community of Richmond, Hoft said, with additional responsibility for grassland and farms that edge the district. “I believe it will have a huge impact on us, both from a rescue standpoint and a wildland firefighting standpoint,” Hoft said. “It will also positively impact the mutual aid districts we work with.” Hoft said DOD FPP works great for volunteer departments that can’t afford expensive apparatus. He called it a vital source for departments like his to customize equipment to fit their needs and provide them the tools needed to protect their communities.
No. D-2474.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Bradley R. Marshall.

562 U.S. 1105, 131 S. Ct. 855,

178 L. Ed. 2d 586,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9607.

December 13, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 40, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1130, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5572.
Whole Genome 

Sequencing (WGS):

New Lab Technology 

Helps Fight 

an Old Disease

Key Terms

Conventional genotyping: A laboratory-based 

test that analyzes specific sections of the 

Mtb genome; these distinct patterns can help 

distinguish different strains of Mtb

Genome: An organism’s total DNA

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb):

The organism that causes TB

Phylogenetic map: A diagram of the 

genetic relationships among Mtb cases

TB genotype cluster: Two or more patients 

with matching genotype patterns 

Whole genome sequencing (WGS): A process 

that examines the entire DNA of an organism 

Why is WGS Useful to 

Tuberculosis Programs?

By comparing the Mtb DNA 

from different patients, 

WGS allows health officials 

to find and investigate the 

spread of TB. 

This 

information 

can help 

public health 

officials 

better 

respond to 

TB outbreaks.

Mapping Related 

TB Cases

Conventional 

Genotyping Methods

A cluster of TB cases can 

be indistinguishable by 

conventional methods.

WGS

Process

Phylogenetic Map 

after WGS

A phylogenetic map 

of TB cases may 

distinguish between 

different clusters.

WGS is a Significant 

Scientific Advancement 

Conventional 

genotyping 

methods 

examine 

less 

than 

1% 

of the 

genome.

Whole 

genome 

sequencing 

can examine 

more 

than 

90% 

of the 

genome.

CDC Uses WGS to Inform TB 

Prevention and Response Strategies

CDC’s TB Laboratory is a leader in use of WGS for 

cluster detection to identify potential outbreaks and 

for surveillance of drug resistance. 

CDC funds the National TB 

Molecular Surveillance Center (NTMSC) 

that provides WGS results for Mtb

samples received from all newly 

diagnosed patients in the United 

States. NTMSC is part of the Antibiotic 

Resistance Laboratory Network. 

CDC has supported 

WGS for 500+

TB clusters in the 

U.S. since 2012. 

The number of 

TB cases in each of these 

clusters ranges from 

2 to 182.