alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Amendment of Severance  Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10(k)

  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of                     , to the
Severance Agreement, dated as of     , 19             (the “Severance Agreement”), is entered into between Alberto-Culver Company, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and
                                        
                     (the “Executive”). 
  

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Severance Agreement as set forth herein. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that
the Severance Agreement shall be amended as set forth below: 
  
 1. Section
3(a)(2) of the Severance Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “(2) a lump-sum cash amount which, when added to any other payments that must be taken into account for purposes of any computation relating to the Executive under Section 280G(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), equals, in the aggregate, (*) times the Executive’s “base amount,” as such term is defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code; provided, that any amount paid pursuant to
this Section 3(a)(2) shall be paid in lieu of any other amount of severance relating to salary or bonus continuation to be received by the Executive upon termination of employment of the Executive under any severance plan, policy or arrangement of
the Company. 
  
 2. Section 4 of the Severance Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the words “Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)” and substituting therefor the word “Code”. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company and the Executive has executed this Amendment as of
the day and year first above written. 
  

	(*) 	2.99 for named executive officers. 

  

			
	 ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY

		
	 By
	 	 
	
	 EXECUTIVE:



  
 Subscribed and Sworn to before
me 
 this              day of 
  
 Notary Public
No. 09-11539.

#### Gregory Shaw, Petitioner v. Donald Gaetz, Warden.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 217,

178 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7097.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-9944.

#### Kermit Pereda-Rebollo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 949, 131 S. Ct. 77,

178 L. Ed. 2d 246,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7789.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 31.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF
AMERICA (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Craig T.
Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Paul J. Weaver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Craig T Dunham
                                   -------------------
                                   Craig T Dunham
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer

                                   /s/ Paul J. Weaver
                                   -------------------
                                   Paul J. Weaver
                                   Chief Financial Officer
December 23, 2009
# EMPLOYEE SPOTLIGHT: Monica Warren

/ Published July 14, 2016
RICHMOND, VA, 
**Name:** Monica M. Warren

**Organization:**  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Office of the Commander

**Years of Service:**  Six years.

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** I am the Executive assistant to the DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli. I plan, organize, facilitate and problem solve to assist him in meeting the needs of the warfighter on an executive level.           

**What would you say has been your major contributions to your organization this year in your job?** My eagerness to learn and my dedication to the DLA mission of supporting this nation’s warfighters.

**What aspect of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?** The high level of trust and responsibility bestowed upon me by DLA Aviation leadership, not just here in Richmond, but across the Aviation platform is very rewarding. Makes coming to work that much more enjoyable and worthwhile.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** Thank you for all you do, in so many ways. If there were no warfighters, there would be no me; both professionally and personally.

**What advice would you have given yourself 10 years ago?** Excellence is a necessary investment.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be?** Nothing beats a failure, but a try.

**Who is the most influential person in your life...past or present?** My mother has been the most influence figure in my life. As a two-time breast cancer survivor, she has endured much adversity, but has always managed to overcome.****

**Who is your favorite actor or actress and why?** Cicely Tyson is definitely my favorite actress. She has withstood the test of time and set an awesome standard.****

**What is/are your favorite book(s), television show(s) or movie(s)?** My two favorite books are “Battlefield of the Mind,” by Joyce Meyer and “The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For?” by Rick Warren.
# C_2015302EN.01004802.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — TVR Automotive v OHIM — TVR Italia (TVR ITALIA)

(Case T-398/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark TVR ITALIA - Earlier national and Community word marks TVR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Revocation proceedings - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 302/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TVR Automotive Ltd (Whiteley, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by G. Schneider and S. Hanne, and subsequently by J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: TVR Italia Srl (Canosa, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2013 (Case R 823/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Muadib Beteiligung GmbH and TVR Italia Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 14 May 2013 (Case R 823/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Muadib Beteiligung GmbH and TVR Italia Srl; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 14 May 2013 (Case R 823/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Muadib Beteiligung GmbH and TVR Italia Srl;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM and TVR Italia Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM and TVR Italia Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.34


                               FIRST AMENDMENT OF
                           DATEK ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP.
                            2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


     WHEREAS, Ameritrade Holding Corporation maintains the Datek Online Holdings
Corp. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of September 25,
2004, in the following particulars:

     1. By changing the name of the Plan from "DATEK ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP. 2001
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN" to "AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN."

     2.  By substituting the following for Section 1 of the Plan:

     "1. Purpose.

         This Plan was originally adopted for the purpose of strengthening Datek
Online Holding Corp. (`Datek') by providing an incentive to its employees,
officers and directors and to the employees, officers and directors of its
Subsidiaries and thereby encouraging them to devote their abilities and industry
to the success of the business enterprise of Datek and its Subsidiaries.
Pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger (the `Merger Agreement'), Datek
Online Holdings Corp. (`Datek') became a subsidiary of a newly formed
corporation, Ameritrade Holding Corporation (`Ameritrade' or the `Company')
effective as of September 9, 2002 (the `Restatement Date') and as of the
Restatement Date, Ameritrade assumed the Plan and all outstanding obligations
hereunder. It is intended that the purpose of the Plan be achieved by extending
to employees (including future employees who have received a formal written
offer of employment), officers and directors of the Company and its affiliates
an added long-term incentive for high levels of performance and unusual efforts
through the grant of Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Stock Options (as
each term is herein defined). Effective as of September 25, 2004, the name of
the Plan was changed to the Ameritrade Holding Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan (the `Plan')."

     3.  By substituting the following for Section 2.27 of the Plan:

     "2.27 `Plan' means the Ameritrade Holding Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended from time to time."
No. 10-7514.

#### Ronald Lee Baxter, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 947,

178 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 325,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Elie S.Akilian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Inet Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the aforementioned Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Elie S.  Akilian                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| July 21,  2004                         |

 

----
No. 10-6029.

#### Eugene W. McWatters, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 510,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8656.

178 L. Ed. 2d 378,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 36 So. 3d 613.
In the Senate of the United States, 

February 13, 2020. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2744) entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development to prescribe the manner in which programs of the agency are identified overseas, and for other purposes.’’, do pass 

with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USAID Branding Mod3 ernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR BRANDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the United 

6 States Agency for International Development (referred to 

7 in this section as ‘‘USAID’’), in coordination with the Sec8 retary of State, as appropriate, and with due consideration 

9 for the safety and security of implementing partners and 
2 

† HR 2744 EAS 

1 beneficiaries, is authorized to prescribe, as appropriate, the 

2 use of logos or other insignia of the USAID Identity, or 

3 the use of additional or substitute markings, including the 

4 United States flag, to appropriately identify, including as 

5 required by section 641 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

6 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2401), overseas programs administered by 

7 USAID. 

8 (b) AUDIT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of USAID 

10 shall submit to Congress an audit of compliance with rel11 evant branding and marking requirements of USAID by 

12 implementing partners funded by USAID, including any 

13 requirements prescribed pursuant to the authorization 

14 under subsection (a). 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 2744 

AMENDMENT
# C_2013336EN.01002802.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/28

---

Action brought on 23 September 2013 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-510/13)

2013/C 336/60

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato, G. Palmieri, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/260/13, 261/13, 262/13, 263/13, 264/13, 265/13 and 266/13 to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment of Danish-language translators, English-language translators, French-language translators, Italian-language translators, Maltese-language translators, Dutch-language translators and Slovenian-language translators, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 199 A of 11 July 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/260/13, 261/13, 262/13, 263/13, 264/13, 265/13 and 266/13 to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment of Danish-language translators, English-language translators, French-language translators, Italian-language translators, Maltese-language translators, Dutch-language translators and Slovenian-language translators, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 199 A of 11 July 2013;

Official Journal of the European Union

| — | order to the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order to the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-275/13 Italy v Commission.

Italy

Commission

---
No. 10-6056.

#### Matthew Pellino, Petitioner v. Greg Province, Warden.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 512,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8608.

178 L. Ed. 2d 379,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 826.
Exhibit
32.1








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and is not filed as
provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamics Research Corporation,
a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      29, 2010
            /s/
      James P. ReganPresident,
      Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
**Exhibit 24-2**

 

**DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFIED RESOLUTIONS**

 

**Form 10-K Annual Report Resolutions**

 

**RESOLVED**, That the Audit Committee be and hereby is appointed to review the Form 10-K Annual Report (including the Corporation’s auditedfinancial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004), provide an opportunity for full Board review of such document and approve the document on behalf of the Board of Directors for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with suchchanges therein as may be deemed necessary or advisable by the officers of the Corporation; and 

 

**FURTHER RESOLVED**, That the Power of Attorney as presented to the meeting and executed by the Directors present be and hereby is approved in formand content for purposes of filing the Form 10-K Annual Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

* * * * * * * 

 

I, EDWARD M. MARSH, Assistant Secretary of Duke Energy Corporation, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and complete extract from the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said Corporation held onFebruary 22, 2005, at which meeting a quorum was present. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Corporate Seal of said Duke Energy Corporation, this the 15th day of March, 2005.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34631-34632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Certificate of Exemption.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0078.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 41 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 10 with multiple responses.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: Ranges between 30 minutes and one hour 
depending on the requirement.
    Needs and Uses: Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), it is 
illegal to engage in interstate or foreign commerce of products 
comprised of endangered fish or wildlife. Certificates of Exemption 
(CE), however, were issued to those persons holding inventories of such 
items before the effective date of the Act. CE holders must renew their 
certificates periodically and are required to report on transfer of 
parts. The information is used by law enforcement personnel to track 
the movement of such items and to differentiate legal items from 
illegal ones.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Quarterly, every five years.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20503.


[[Page 34632]]


    Dated: June 18, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-16867 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Krakoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

|By: |  | /s/ROBERT L. KRAKOFFRobert L. Krakoff
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|    |  |                                                               |  | 
|    |  | Date: December 6, 2002                                        |  | 

---