alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1*

Page 90


                           Section 1350 Certification

        We, Christopher J. Dyball and Richard M. Haddock, the co-chief executive
officers of Drexler Technology Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the
United States Code that, to our knowledge:

        (i)     the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   June 15, 2004


/s/ Christopher J. Dyball       /s/ Richard M. Haddock
-----------------------------   -----------------------------
Christopher J. Dyball           Richard M. Haddock

-----------------------

*The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 277 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  Union Calendar No. 84
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 277

                          [Report No. 116-115]

  To adjust collateral requirements under the Small Business Act for 
                disaster loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

  Ms. Velazquez (for herself and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

                             June 13, 2019

           Additional sponsors: Ms. Finkenauer and Mrs. Craig

                             June 13, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To adjust collateral requirements under the Small Business Act for 
                disaster loans, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Sufficient Capital for 
Everyone in Natural Disaster areas Act of 2019'' or the ``ASCEND Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DISASTER LOANS UNDER THE SMALL 
              BUSINESS ACT.

    (a) Amendment to the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015.--Section 2102 
of the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015 (Public Law 114-88) is amended 
be striking subsections (b) and (c).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as though enacted as part of the RISE After Disaster Act of 
2015.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 84

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 277

                          [Report No. 116-115]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To adjust collateral requirements under the Small Business Act for 
                disaster loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 13, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
No. 10-6661.

#### Richard Gordon Bloomer, Petitioner v. Wyoming.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 540,

178 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8437.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.

Same case below, 233 P.3d 971.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35187-35188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Amendment to Certification of Central Filing System--Oklahoma

    The Statewide central filing system of Oklahoma has been previously 
certified, pursuant to Section 1324 of the Food Security Act of 1985, 
on the basis of information submitted by the Oklahoma Secretary of 
State, for farm products produced in that State (52 FR 49056, December 
29, 1987).
    The certification is hereby amended on the basis of information 
submitted by Tom Cole, Secretary of State, for additional farm products 
used or produced in farming operations, or a product of such crop or 
livestock in its

[[Page 35188]]

unmanufactured state that is in the possession of a person engaged in 
farming operations in that State as follows:

teff, kudu, gemsbok, eland, gnu

    This is issued pursuant to authority delegated by the Secretary of 
Agriculture.

    Authority: Sec. 1324(c)(2), Pub. L. 99-198, 99 Stat. 1535, 7 
U.S.C. 1631(c)(2); 7 CFR 2.22(a)(3)(v), 2.81(a)(5), 55 FR 22795.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Harold W. Davis,
Deputy Administrator, Packers and Stockyards Programs.
[FR Doc. 98-17182 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Haley

, McCullough and Senior Judge Willis

U R S CORPORATION AND

INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 1076

- 11

- 1 PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 JEFFREY WAYN E HAILEY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

( Lorraine B. D’Angelo; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C. , on brief) , for appellants

.
( Gregory E. Camden; Montagna, Klein, Camden, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee

.

U R S Co rporation and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania appeal a

decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that , after a work

- related injury by

accident on April 7, 2008, Jeffrey Wayne Hailey adequately marketed his residual work capaci ty

from May 3, 2010 forward

. W e have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

commission in its final opinion. See Hailey v. U R S Corp

. , VWC File N o. 238

- 04

- 47 ( May 6
,

20 11 ). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rul e 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35588-35589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Notice

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS NOTICE: 63 FR 33931, June 22, 
1998.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:00 a.m., 
Wednesday, June 24, 1998.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following topic was moved from the open 
portion to the closed portion of the meeting:
    <bullet> Proposed Settlement Agreement Regarding the Federal Home 
Loan Bank of Des Moines Petition
    The above matter was moved to the closed portion of the meeting, 
pursuant

[[Page 35589]]

to section 906.5(b) of the Finance Board regulations and exempt under 
section 552b(c)(8) of title 5 of the United States Code.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
William W. Ginsberg,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 98-17540 Filed 6-26-98; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
EXHIBIT 32 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

OVALE GROUP, INC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

This is to certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ovale Group, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2008:

 

a.              fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

 

b.             that information contained in such periodic report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ovale Group, Inc.

 

/s/ Vladimir Fabert

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 14, 2008

 

/s/  Vladimir Fabert

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14, 2008
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        8
        
        9
        
        10
        
        11
        
        12 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        10
        
        11
        
        12 (current)
        
        13
        
        14
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 09-11556.

#### Jose Tolentino, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 595,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8865.

178 L. Ed. 2d 433,

November 15, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of New York granted.

Same case below, 14 N.Y.3d 382, 900 N.Y.S.2d 708, 926 N.E.2d 1212.
# C_2015320EN.01002502.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/25

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — CD Consulting s.r.o. v Anna Pančurová, Róbert Demeter, Kristína Pužová, Katarína Harakľová, Roman Novák, Marcela Grundzová, Milan Pulko, Peter Chomča, Jarmila Lešková, Katarína Malarová, Jana Belajová, Tatiana Kučkovská, Marián Demeter, Helena Chomčová, Marcela Troščáková, Nataša Virágová, Kvetuša Hudáková, Peter Grundza, Dávid Renner, Zdenko Ričalka, Jarmila Kurejová, Mária Maxinová

(Case C-328/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 320/35)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

BRIAN MARTIN KURTYKA *

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG No. 4 4 September Term, 20 2 3



### O R D E R Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent , filed by Bar Counsel and Respondent, Brian Martin K u rtyka , on March 18 , 2024 in the above

- captioned

case , in which the p arties jointly petition this Court to disbar Respondent pursuant to Rule

19

- 736 , WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action alleging that Respondent had been found guilty of a serious cri me within the meaning of Maryland Rule 19

- 701(t) and 19

- 738(a), WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, this Court issued a show cause order pursuant to Maryland Rule 19

- 738(d) directing Respondent within fifteen days of the date of the

order to show cause in writi ng why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pending further order of this Court and, to date, no response has been received , WHEREAS , in the joint petition, the parties advise that Respondent was charged in the Circuit Court for Washington County in State of Maryland vs. Brian M. Kurtyka , Case

No. C

- 21

- CR

- 22

- 000725 , with two counts of “ Embezzlement Misappropriate ” and one

count of “ Forgery, Private Documents ,” pled guilty to all three counts on Jan uary 16, 2024 , and was sentenced to fifteen years of incarceration with all but five years suspended and five years’ supervised probation with restitution in the amount of $672,354.51 to be paid ,WHEREAS , the parties advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct as described

in the joint petition violates Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct Rules 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) (misconduct) and that Respondent consents to disbarment , it is this

20th day of March 2024 , ORDERED , by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent is GRANTED , and the Respondent, Brian Martin K u rtyka , is

DISBA R RED , effective immediately ; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Brian Martin

K u rtyka from the register of attorneys in the Court , certify that fact to the Client Protection

Fund of the Maryland , and send notice to all Clerks of Court and other persons as required by Maryland Rule 19

- 761

.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Ju stice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael T. Grasing, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 196]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered January 5, 2015, convicting him of aggravated vehicular homicide, manslaughter in the second degree, leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, failure to stay in a designated lane, and exceeding the speed limit, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court properly denied the defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror, since the statements made by the prospective juror did not demonstrate actual bias or otherwise indicate that he would be unable to render an impartial verdict *(see*CPL 270.20 [1] [b]; *People v Ragland,*136 AD3d 845, 845 [2016]; *People v Wright,*134 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2015]; *People v Legette,*96 AD3d 1078, 1079 [2012]).

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of aggravated vehicular homicide (Penal Law § 125.14 [4]) and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2]) beyond a reasonable doubt (see *People v Hale,*147 AD3d 975 [2017]; *People v Leddy,*47 AD3d 842 [2008]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see *People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633, 643-644 [2006]).

*795Further, while “[t]estimony about victims’ personal backgrounds that is immaterial to any issue at trial should be excluded” *(People v Harris,*98 NY2d 452, 490-491 [2002]; *see People v Holiday,*142 AD3d 625 [2016]), to the extent that testimony was elicited from the victim’s mother which was irrelevant to the sequence of events, any error was harmless as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no significant probability that the error contributed to his convictions *(see People v LaValle,*3 NY3d 88, 114 [2004]; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]; *see also People v Humphrey,*15 AD3d 683, 685 [2005]).

Similarly, although the County Court erred in allowing police officers to testify about remarks made to them by a witness to the incident, who was unavailable to testify at trial, such error was harmless *(see People v Johnson,*1 NY3d 302, 306 [2003]; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d at 237).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
# C_2014448EN.01002401.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/24

---

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Khatziioannou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-330/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/31)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lella Khatziioannou (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Lella Khatziioannou is ordered to pay, in addition to her own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lella Khatziioannou is ordered to pay, in addition to her own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
R.H. DONNELLEY INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001065310
<NAME> R.H. DONNELLEY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,177
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,853
<PP&E>                                          61,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 407,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,106
<BONDS>                                        438,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   (204,273)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   407,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,706
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39


</TABLE>
No. 10-6711.

#### Ignacio Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 543,

178 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8444,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-33.

#### Suquamish Indian Tribe, Petitioner v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, et al.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 414,

178 L. Ed. 2d 322,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8230.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 1020.
No. 10-371.

#### Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc., Petitioner v. Samuel H. Sadow.

562 U.S. 1135, 131 S. Ct. 905,

178 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 265.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 43 So. 3d 710.