alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015389EN.01002702.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Appelrath-Cüpper v OHIM — Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement (AC)

(Case T-60/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark AC - Earlier figurative national and international trade marks AC ANN CHRISTINE and earlier figurative Community trade marks AC ANN CHRISTINE OCEAN and AC ANN CHRISTINE INTIMATE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 389/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Schumann and A. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: M. Hartmann, N. Voß and S. Fröhlich, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 November 2012 (Case R 108/2012-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG and Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 November 2012 (Case R 108/2012-4) is annulled in so far as it upheld in part the opposition brought by Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 November 2012 (Case R 108/2012-4) is annulled in so far as it upheld in part the opposition brought by Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH;

| 3. | Orders Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. Reynolds, Civ. 
A. No 96-0014-C, was lodged on June 12, 1998 with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The consent decree 
resolves the claims of the United States under Section 106(b), 107(a), 
and 107(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act, as amended (``CERCLA''), for reimbursement of 
response costs incurred at the Singleton Drum Site in Castleton, 
Rappahannock County, Virginia, as well as civil penalties for failure 
to comply with a Unilateral Administrative Order issued by EPA. The 
consent decree obligates Settling Defendants to pay $277,500 in 
reimbursement of response costs incurred by EPA in responding to 
contamination at the Site, and civil penalties. Of this amount, 
approximately $144,000 will be paid in full reimbursement of EPA's 
response costs at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Reynolds, DOJ Ref. <greek-i>90-11-2-1072.
    The consent decree may be examined at the office of the United 
States Attorney, 616 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106; 
the Region III Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 841 
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA; and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 624-0892. A 
copy of the consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and 
enclose a check in the amount of $4.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 
cost), payable to the Consent Decree library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environmental & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-17500 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110-15-M
DLA Energy’s Pacific pivot begins in the Americas
 
  By Terry Shawn
    regional offices       DLA Energy Americas         Improvements Advance the Pivot                   Training Promotes Readiness               History Has Seen Repositioning Before
# C_2014112EN.01002201.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 9 December 2013 — Criminal proceedings against Mirko Saba

(Case C-652/13)

2014/C 112/27

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Mirko Saba

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures?

Costa and Cifone

| 2. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates?

Costa and Cifone

---
World TB Day

March 24

eos
@ National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Fl @
Xv Division of Tuberculosis Elimination SS
No. 10-6116.

#### In re Caesar White, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1001, 131 S. Ct. 517,

178 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8448.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.2








The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and is not filed as provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamics Research Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:




(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 28, 2011
/s/ David KeleherSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# C_2015389EN.01003701.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — Ecolab USA v OHIM (GREASECUTTER)

(Case T-610/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark GREASECUTTER - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 389/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ecolab USA, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2013 (Case R 1704/2012-2), concerning the international registration designating the European Community of the word mark GREASECUTTER.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ecolab USA, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ecolab USA, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
# C_2014045EN.01003801.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/38

---

Action brought on 25 November 2013 — The Tea Board v OHIM — Delta Lingerie (DARJEELING collection de lingerie)

(Case T-626/13)

2014/C 45/66

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Tea Board (Calcutta, India) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Delta Lingerie (Cachan, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 September 2013 given in Case R 1501/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 September 2013 given in Case R 1501/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘Darjeeling collection de lingerie’ for Classes 25, 35 and 38 — the Community trade mark application No 9 468 463

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community collective trade mark registration No 4 325 718 of the word mark ‘DARJEELING’ for goods in Class 30; Community collective trade mark registration No 8 674 327 of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘DARJEELING’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7009.

#### Chad Davis, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1144, 131 S. Ct. 913,

178 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 255.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, denied.
No. 10-7440.

#### Naim Nafis Shakir, aka Naim Shakir, aka James Perry, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 841,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9639.

178 L. Ed. 2d 571,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 616 F.3d 315.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          60,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,106
<PP&E>                                          34,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,608)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,045
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               376,567
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,677
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7281.

#### Amin A. Rashid, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 682,

178 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9153.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EX 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Gaming and Entertainment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the period ending December 31,
2007 has filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I,  Chen  Weidong,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
Director  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition  and  result  of  operations  of the
Company.


Name & Title					Date

/s/  Chen Weidong
-----------------
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer), President, and Director	April 15, 2008
No. 09-11267.

#### Nasario Cruz-Betancourt, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 170,

178 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7021.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDUCATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         171,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,370,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                   242,700
<INVENTORY>                                 10,402,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,001,862
<PP&E>                                       1,320,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,597,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,436,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,084,848
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,981,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,597,500
<SALES>                                     19,343,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,343,362
<CGS>                                        7,771,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,830,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,483,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,813,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,108,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,704,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,704,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7374.

#### Tyrell T. Brown, Petitioner v. Ken Clark, Warden.

562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 939,

178 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 347,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter S. Teshima, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PETER S.
TESHIMAPeter S. TeshimaCorporate Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-610.

#### Ronald Prati, et ux., Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1139, 131 S. Ct. 940,

178 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 226.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 1301.
No. 10-484.

#### Brant Sitzes, Individually and as Joint Administrator of the Estate of Brittney Rae Sitzes, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. City of West Memphis, Arkansas, et al.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 828,

178 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9788.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 461.