alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Land and Maritime Deputy Commander visits Pearl Harbor enroute to Western Pacific

/ Published Aug. 25, 2015
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, 
Mr. James McClaugherty, DLA Land and Maritime deputy commander, visited the Pearl Harbor Naval shipyard and DLA-Pacific Aug. 10 on his first stop of an international trip through the Pacific region.

Approximately 45 members of the Land and Maritime family call Pearl Harbor home, and the deputy commander ensured them that it would be impossible for Land and Maritime to be the high-performing organization that it is without the individual resiliency of the Maritime Pearl workforce.

McClaugherty first met with the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Commander, followed by a meeting with the DLA-Pacific Deputy Commander. He then participated in a roundtable discussion involving all of DLA-Pacific region Primary Level Field Activities Commanders and Directors.  The discussion gave him an opportunity to learn about the Pacific region’s operational chain and hear about current initiatives from each activity. 

For associates at DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor, the highlight of McClaugherty’s visit was his presence at a Town Hall. He recognized several of the detachment’s associates for their contributions in process improvements and in providing outstanding customer support. A total of nine individuals were recognized with the Deputy Commander’s coin as an award for their outstanding support to the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility customer in the areas of procurement, material expediting and business office functions. 

Coin recipients included: Dean Hazama, Debra Poai, CherylAnn Kealoha-Guerrero, Michelle Levine, LS1 Jason Washington, Louise Lum, Jessica Sanchez, LS2 Jamey Smith and LSC (sel) Salvador Caballero.  

In addition to the presentation of coins, LS1 James Trovato was recognized as DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor’s Senior Sailor of the Quarter and LS2 Gregory Garcia as the Junior Sailor of the Quarter. During the town hall, McClaugherty also discussed the components of DLA’s strategic plan goals: Warfighter First, People and Culture, Financial Stewardship, Strategic Engagement and Process Excellence.  He concluded the town hall by accepting questions from attendees and then hosted a meet-and-greet with associates. 

After departing Pearl Harbor, McClaugherty visited Yokosuka and Sasebo, Japan, continuing to visit global DLA Land and Maritime customers.  The increased understanding gained through regular meetings and conferences enables DLA to leverage the knowledge gained and address concerns, engage in information-sharing, and improve support both before and after contract award.
No. 10-7433.

#### Tommy Gastello, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1184, 131 S. Ct. 1005,

178 L. Ed. 2d 836,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 845.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 49 Cal. 4th 395, 110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 658, 232 P.3d 650.
No. 10-7356.

#### Samuel Windham, Jr., Petitioner v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 979,

178 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 292,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 657.
## Schlemmer. Kevin(OSn From: 

### Sent: To: Cc: Subject:
Dear Sirs: Rob McKinney <rob@seaportair.com> Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:22 PM EAS(OSn SeaPort EASForwarder; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Clovis NM

SeaPort Airlines respectfully requests aone week extension to the deadline to file for essential air service for Clovis, NM. Thank you. Rob McKinney President 

# SEA~PORT ===="",,- IRLI NES rob@seaportair.com 888 573 2767 : reservations 971 340 1711 :office POX 971 732 7678 :fax PDX 

# r

1
# C_2013260EN.01004203.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/42

---

Action brought on 27 June 2013 — Groupe Léa Nature/OHIM — Debonaire Trading (SO'BiO ētic)

(Case T-341/13)

2013/C 260/76

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Léa Nature (Périgny, France) (represented by: S. Arnaud, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Debonaire Trading Internacional, Lda (Funchal, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the application admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the application admissible;

| — | Annul decision R 203/2011-1 of the First Board of Appeal for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 March 2013, notified 18 April 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul decision R 203/2011-1 of the First Board of Appeal for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 March 2013, notified 18 April 2013;

| — | Order DEBONAIRE TRADING INTERNACIONAL LDA and OHIM each to bear the costs, which they have incurred in the course of the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order DEBONAIRE TRADING INTERNACIONAL LDA and OHIM each to bear the costs, which they have incurred in the course of the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SO’Bio ētic’, for goods in classes 3, 24 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 6 827 281

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registrations and United Kingdom trade mark registrations of the word mark ‘SO...?’et al., for goods in classes 3 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

et al.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application with respect to all goods claimed in classes 3 and 25

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) and (5) of CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7687.

#### Anthony Matos, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1158, 131 S. Ct. 959,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 471.

178 L. Ed. 2d 790,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

*791Same case below, 611 F.3d 31.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2810 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain payments 

made by Indian tribal governments as earned income for purposes of 

the kiddie tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Ms. MOORE (for herself, Mr. ESTES, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mr. COLE, Mr. COOK, Mrs. CRAIG, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. KIND, 

Mr. RUIZ, Ms. SHALALA, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. KILDEE, and Mr. CISNEROS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain payments made by Indian tribal governments as 

earned income for purposes of the kiddie tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Fairness for Trib5 al Youth Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2810 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE BY INDIAN TRIBAL GOV2 ERNMENTS TREATED AS EARNED INCOME 

3 FOR KIDDIE TAX. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(g)(4)(C) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(C) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS

7 AS EARNED INCOME.—For purposes of this sub8 section, each of the following amounts shall be 

9 treated as earned income of the child referred 

10 to in paragraph (1) to the extent included in 

11 the gross income of such child: 

12 ‘‘(i) DISTRIBUTIONS FROM QUALIFIED

13 DISABILITY TRUSTS.—Any amount in14 cluded in the gross income of such child 

15 under section 652 or 662 by reason of 

16 being a beneficiary of a qualified disability 

17 trust (as defined in section 

18 642(b)(2)(C)(ii)). 

19 ‘‘(ii) CERTAIN INDIAN TRIBAL PAY20 MENTS.—Any payment made by an Indian 

21 tribal government (as defined in section 

22 139E(c)(1)), or from a trust of which the 

23 Indian tribal government is treated as the 

24 owner under subpart E of part I of sub25 chapter J, to such child if— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2810 IH

1 ‘‘(I) such child is an enrolled 

2 member of the tribe with respect to 

3 such Indian tribal government, and 

4 ‘‘(II) such payment is received by 

5 such child by reason of such enroll6 ment.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICATION TO ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM

8 TAX.—Section 59(j)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by 

9 inserting ‘‘and including amounts treated as earned in10 come under section 1(g)(4)(C)’’ after ‘‘section 911(d)(2)’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2847 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2847

To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family member of 
 a member of the Armed Forces who is in a hospital or medical facility 
                    abroad, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2019

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself, Ms. Spanberger, Mr. Wilson of South 
 Carolina, and Mr. Connolly) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family member of 
 a member of the Armed Forces who is in a hospital or medical facility 
                    abroad, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Passport Fees for Heroes' 
Families Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PASSPORT FEES FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 1 of the Passport Act of June 4, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214) is 
amended, in the third sentence, by inserting ``from a husband, wife, 
domestic partner, child, parent, grandparent, brother, or sister of a 
member of the Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit such member in a 
hospital or other medical facility;'' after ``funeral or memorial 
service for such member;''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.01


 


 


 


 


June 4, 2014


 


Securities and Exchange Commision


100 F. Street


Washington, DC 20549


 


Re: Pacific Oil Company


Commission File No. 333-144504


 


We have read the statements that we understand Pacific Oil
Company will include in Item 4.01 of the Form 8-K report it will file regarding the recent change of auditors. We agree with such
statements made regarding our firm.


 


We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statement
made in Item 4.01 of such report.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC


 


M&K CPAS, PLLC
# C_2017374EN.01000201.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017 — Intel Corp. v European Commission, Association for Competitive Technology Inc., Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir)

(Case C-413/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 102 TFEU - Abuse of a dominant position - Loyalty rebates - Commission’s jurisdiction - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 19))

(2017/C 374/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Intel Corp. (represented by: D. Beard QC, and by A. Parr and R. Mackenzie, Solicitors)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, V. Di Bucci, M. Kellerbauer and N. Khan, acting as Agents), Association for Competitive Technology Inc. (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, avocat), Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 June 2014, Intel v Commission (T-286/09, EU:T:2014:547); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 June 2014, Intel v Commission (T-286/09, EU:T:2014:547);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders that the costs be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders that the costs be reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 10.11.2014.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2761 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to immediately release certain grant funds awarded for mitigation activities under 

the Community Development Block Grant program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Mrs. FLETCHER (for herself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BRADY, 

Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. FLORES, Ms. GARCIA of 

Texas, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, 

Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. RICE of 

South Carolina, Mr. YOHO, Mr. OLSON, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, 

and Mr. BUTTERFIELD) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget to immediately release certain grant funds 

awarded for mitigation activities under the Community 

Development Block Grant program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bipartisan Disaster 

5 Recovery Funding Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2761 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) Funding for mitigation activities was appro4 priated to the Department of Housing and Urban 

5 Development by Congress in February 2018 under 

6 the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 

7 115–123; 132 Stat. 64). 

8 (2) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Devel9 opment told Congress that the funding described in 

10 paragraph (1) would be released by May 1, 2019. 

11 (3) May 1, 2019, has come and gone with no 

12 official explanation as to the reason for the contin13 ued delay in releasing the funds. 

14 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT. 

15 For all amounts made available for mitigation activi16 ties under the heading ‘‘Department of Housing and 

17 Urban Development—Community Planning and Develop18 ment—Community Development Fund’’ in Public Law 

19 115–123, and awarded as grants by the Secretary of 

20 Housing and Urban Development, the Director of the Of21 fice of Management and Budget shall, not later than 60 

22 days after the date of enactment of this Act, release such 

23 amounts awarded to all eligible grantees, regardless of any 

24 further studies as may be otherwise required by law. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# Aviation employee featured in new video

/ Published April 13, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia, YouTube pageFacebook page
#### People v Asfour

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1669

denied
No. 10-7933.

#### Arthur Michael Kinsella, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1191, 131 S. Ct. 1027,

178 L. Ed. 2d 849,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 659.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 622 F.3d 75.
EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Kenneth A. Paladino and Marvin
D. Genzer, and each of them, with full power of substitution, the undersigned's
true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute in his name and on his behalf,
in any and all capabilities, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EDO Corporation
(the "Company"), a New York corporation, for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1997, and any and all other instruments which such attorneys and agents, or
either of them, deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply
with the annual reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms as his
own act and deed all that such attorneys and agents, and each of them, shall do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Either of such attorneys and agents shall
have, and may exercise, all of the powers hereby conferred.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed their signatures this 20th
day of March, 1998.

     Robert E. Allen
     Robert Alvine
     Mellon C. Baird
     George M. Ball
     Joseph F. Engelberger
     Frank A. Fariello
     William J. Frost
     Marvin D. Genzer
     Robert M. Hanisee
     Michael J. Hegarty
     Ira Kaplan
     George A. Strutz, Jr.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 129 (Tuesday, July 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-260-000]

Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd., Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 30, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 26, 1998, Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd. 
(WIC), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 2, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to be effective August 1, 1998.
    WIC states that the purpose of this filing is to conform WIC's 
Second Revised Volume No. 2 tariff to requirements of Order No. 587-G 
that interstate pipelines transporting pursuant to Section 284.223 of 
the Commission's Regulations conform their tariffs to include Version 
1.2 of the GISB Standard.
    WIC further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
WIC's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17906 Filed 7-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 08/22/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: R8 State of North Dakota Call - August 22, 2014 

SUMMARY: 

EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff participated in a conference call with the North Dakota

Department of Health on August 22, 2014, to discuss questions related to the proposed rule under 

section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The rule was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Headquarters

Jan Cortelyou-Lee - Lead

David Grisley et al, Gabriele Stevens Jim Ketcham-Colwill, Brian Fisher, Erica Wilson, Robyn DeYoung, 

Juan Santiago, David Solomon, Ellen Kurlansky

 

EPA Region 8

Laura Farris

External Participants

ND Department of Health: Tom Bachman, Maggie Olsen, and other staff.

Discussion Topics

See attached.
No. 10-6703.

#### Bernie F. Briggs, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 659,

178 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9423.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5879.

#### Robert L. Davis, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 473,

178 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8058.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-10596.

#### Kathalina Monacelli, Petitioner v. New York State Banking Department, et al.

562 U.S. 1058, 131 S. Ct. 683,

178 L. Ed. 2d 473,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9208.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/s/    RAJEEV MADHAVANRajeev Madhavan Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 9, 2006




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-5571.

#### Kenwayne Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1085, 131 S. Ct. 641,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9152.

178 L. Ed. 2d 515,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *516Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 95.
No. 10-5458.

#### Gary L. Cheatham, Petitioner v. Brian Coleman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7204.

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-7893.

#### Lawrence Webb, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1190, 131 S. Ct. 1024,

178 L. Ed. 2d 847,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 889.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 Fed. Appx. 850.