alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016410EN.01003202.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/32

---

Order of the General Court of 7 September 2016 — Gemeente Eindhoven v Commission

(Case T-370/13) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
No. 09-987.

No. 09-991.

#### Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization, Petitioner v. Kathleen M. Winn, et al. Gale Garriott, Director, Arizona Department of Revenue, Petitioner v. Kathleen M. Winn, et al.

562 U.S. 1090, 131 S. Ct. 857,

178 L. Ed. 2d 621,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 2.

January 7, 2011.

Motion of respondents Glenn Dennard, et al. for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted. Motion of respondents Kathleen M. Winn, et al. for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted.
# Introduction

# GenericV2.0.1

# GenericV2.0

# CSv1.0.x

# all other versions of CS MMG
NUMBER                                                                SHARES

______                                                                ______

                             Vision BioEnergy, Inc.

                              A Nevada Corporation

                      200,000,000 Shares of Common Stock,
                           Par Value $0.0001 Per Share

HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED 'THE CORPORATION" TRANSFERABLE ON THE SHARE
REGISTER OF THE CORPORATION UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY
ENDORSED OR ASSIGNED.

     This  certificate and the shares represented hereby shall be subject to all
of  the  provisions  of  the  Articles  of Incorporation and the By-laws of said
Corporation,  a  copy  of  which is on file at the office of the corporation and
made  a  part  hereof  fully  as  though  the  provisions  of  said  Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws imprinted in full on this certificate, to all of which
the  holder  of  this certificate by acceptance hereof, assents and agrees to be
bound.

     Any  shareholder  may  obtain from the principal office of the Corporation,
upon  request  and  without  charge,  a  statement  of  the  number  of  shares
constituting  each  class  or series of stock and the designation thereof; and a
copy  of  the  rights,  preferences,  privileges, and restrictions granted to or
imposed  upon  the  respective  classes  or series of stock and upon the holders
thereof  by  said  Articles  of  Incorporation  and  the  By-laws.

WITNESS THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED
OFFICERS.


                               [Graphics omitted]

    ___________________________               ___________________________
# Troop Support commander discusses future of military feeding, nutrition with industry partners

/ Published Oct. 29, 2015
ATLANTIC CITY, New Jersey, 
Warfighters can’t get the food they need to accomplish their mission without the support of the food industry, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s commander said during a meeting Oct. 20 in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton was a keynote speaker for the fall 2015 Research and Development Associates for Military Food and Packing Systems Inc. meeting. He credited R&DA members for being at his side during combat deployments to help solve complex food support problems.

“We are partners; I can’t do what I do in supporting the services and combat commanders if I don’t have you to support them,” Hamilton said.

Hamilton also spoke about the importance of providing nutritious food to keep warfighters healthy and the future of military feeding.

Subsistence supply chain employees also held presentations and workshops during the four-day meeting to discuss how to better serve the warfighter. Topics included new policies and procedures affecting the National Allowance Pricing Agreement and Manufacturer's Pricing Agreements, as well as the future of rations and food service technology. 

Steve Moody, director of combat feeding at the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, said that the food industry and other partners always want to be ready to meet the needs of the warfighters. 

“R&DA has been around for a long time, and it really is a bunch of people working together to try to solve problems,” Moody said. “That is very unique. I don’t know if you realize how unique that is within the military setting, but we really have a great thing here.”

The importance of nutrition and how to better feed warfighters in the future were emphasized in many of the speakers’ presentations.

Hamilton briefly touched on the tactical human optimization, rapid rehabilitation and reconditioning program. The pilot program is a combined holistic approach to improve mental and physical performance of the Army Special Operations Forces at Fort Bragg, North Carolina through training and nutrition. 

Hamilton believes that five to 10 years from now, all military dining facilities will use the same nutrition standards that result from the pilot program.

Moody said that Natick adjusts their products based on their tracking of what service members eat.

“They (industry) are looking at the connection between diet and health, and that translates into the warfighter,” said Moody. “People are looking at food and eating differently. We have to be able to adjust to that.” 

The general ended his presentation by posing a question to R&DA members to make them think about the future of warfighter feeding.

 “Our soldiers will drive past five dining facilities, drive off the installation, go buy whatever they are going to buy, and drive back onto the installation in their car and have a few seconds before their next formation,” said Hamilton. “Think about the millennial, how they eat, how they think.”
No. 10-6847.

#### Dexter Baines, Petitioner v. Chicago Board of Education, et al.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 823,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9785.

178 L. Ed. 2d 562,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
# History of June’s recognition as LGBT Pride Month

/ Published June 30, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Celebrating its 16th year as a Federally-recognized month of pride, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month originated in the U.S. in 1994.   
Founded by a Missouri high-school teacher, the idea was to have a month dedicated to the diversity of America’s citizens, rededicate the nation to equality and encourage honesty and openness among the LGBT community.  

The month of October was first chosen as the celebratory month, as National Coming Out Day had already been established as October 11, and the month also commemorated the first march on Washington for Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual equal rights and liberation by LGBT people in 1979.

In June 2000, however, President Bill Clinton declared June as the official Gay and Lesbian Pride Month.  June was formally chosen as the month in honor of the Stonewall Riots, a series of violent demonstrations by members of the LGBT community, protesting a police raid that took place in June 1969 at the Stonewall Inn in Manhattan.  The raid was seen as harassment and a rejection of the LGBT community and was the catalyst for the Gay Liberation movement.

The official name was changed in 2009, when President Barack Obama declared June “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month” to be more inclusive.

This year, the Department of Defense has chosen the theme of “Celebration” to commemorate the month.  In keeping with this theme, President Obama declared the Stonewall Inn and its surrounding area the Stonewall National Monument on June 28, formally recognizing the sites history.

In a proclamation announcing the monument, President Obama wrote “From this place and time, building on the work of many before, the nation started the march — not yet finished — toward securing equality and respect for L.G.B.T. people.”
Exhibit 23.1: CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

GPS Industries, Inc.
Surrey, B. C.
Canada

       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
       Statements on Form S-8 (File 333- 99259, 333-73298 and 333-110364) of GPS
       Industries, Inc. of our report dated April 13, 2004 relating to the
       financial statements of GPS Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and
       2003 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this
       Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

/s/ Sherb & Co. LLP
New York, New York
April 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36252-36253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings:

    Name of SEP: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel 
Review of Study for Women's Health Across the Nation.
    Dates of Meeting: July 8-9, 1998.
    Times of Meeting: July 8--7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; July 9--8:00 
a.m. to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Bethesda, Maryland 
20815.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review grant application.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul Lenz, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Gateway Building, Room 2C212, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9205, (301) 496-9666.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

    Name of SEP: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel 
Longitudinal Measurement of Cardiovascular Parameters in Persons of 
Various Ages (Teleconference).
    Date of Meeting: July 10, 1998.
    Time of Meeting: 1:00 p.m. to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Gateway Building, Room 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review on contract proposal.
    Contact Person: Dr. Arthur Schaerdel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Gateway Building, Room 2C212, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9205, (301) 496-9666.

    Name of SEP: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel 
Review of grant application from RAND.
    Date of Meeting: July 17, 1998.
    Time of Meeting: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Place of Meeting: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review a program project grant application.
    Contact Person: Dr. Arthur Schaerdel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Gateway Building, Room 2C212, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9205, (301) 496 9666.

    This meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 36253]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: June 25, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-17619 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

TheBoard of Directors 

El Paso Electric Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-17971, 333-82129, and 333-142557) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-151021) on Form S-3 of El Paso Electric Company of our report datedFebruary 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of El Paso Electric Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive operations, changes incommon stock equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of El Paso Electric Company. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

February 25, 2010 

 

147
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the period ending  March 31, 2003
(the "Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
November 8, 2005
Warner Robins, Georgia

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

**Start Date/Time:**

Sunday, September 1, 2024 12:00 PM

**Description:**

During the month of September, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, Warner Robins, Georgia will transition to the Warehouse Management System. Customers with questions or concerns about their material are encouraged to reach out via the contact information found on the Warner Robins, Georgia location page.

Enrolled Users:

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
No. 10-6088.

#### Bill Joseph Stone, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 970, 131 S. Ct. 479,

178 L. Ed. 2d 304,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7995.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Environmental Protection Division

2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Suite 1456, Atlanta, Georgia 30334

Judson H. Turner, Director

(404) 656-4713

February 3, 2015

Beverly Banister, Director

Air, Pesticides & Toxics Management Division

US EPA Region 4

61 Forsyth St., SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

Dear Ms. Banister:

I have attached the AMP Reports (AMP600 and AMP450NC) for certification of the 

2014 Georgia PM2.5 monitoring data. The ambient concentration data and the quality 

assurance data are submitted to AQS. The ambient air data are accurate to the best of 

my knowledge, taking into consideration the quality assurance findings.

If you should have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 363-7004 or 

DeAnna.Oser@dnr.state.ga.us

Sincerely,

DeAnna Oser

Program Manager

Ambient Monitoring Program

Cc: Todd Rinck, US EPA, Region IV

Darren Palmer, US EPA, Region IV

EPA Correspondence File
#### People v Jones (Dylan)

App Term, 1st Dept: 50 Misc 3d 136(A) (NY)

denied 8/1/16 (Rivera, J.)
No. 09-11312.

#### Stephen Schnepf, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 176,

178 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6728.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-7556.

#### James Faulds, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1155, 131 S. Ct. 949,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 345.

178 L. Ed. 2d 784,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 566.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                          28,067                  29,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,789                  29,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,496                  15,297
<INVENTORY>                                      4,462                   4,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,076                  57,794
<PP&E>                                         317,808                 303,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,531                 136,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,283                 250,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,098                  38,032
<BONDS>                                        328,570                 327,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           519                     519
<OTHER-SE>                                   (138,934)               (134,592)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,283                 250,744
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,793                 295,390
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  221,522                 212,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,692                  47,771
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,988                   3,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,978                  35,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,387)                 (3,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)                   1,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,287)                 (4,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,287)                 (4,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.83)                   (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7054.

#### In re Patrick McPherron, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1133, 131 S. Ct. 915,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 22.

178 L. Ed. 2d 807,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# C_2015262EN.01002001.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — H. P. Gauff Ingenieure v OHIM (Gauff JBG Ingenieure)

(Case T-585/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Gauff JBG Ingenieure - Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks GAUFF - Relative grounds for refusal - Partial refusal to register - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 262/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: H. P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: G. Schneider-Rothhaar, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2013 (Case R 596/2013-1) relating to an application for restitutio in integrum.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | Orders Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
# C_2013352EN.01001603.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/16

---

Action brought on 18 September 2013 — ASPA v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (ARGENTARIA)

(Case T-502/13)

2013/C 352/31

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Argenta Spaarbank NV (ASPA) (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: K. De Winter and M. De Vroey, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 July 2013 given in Case R 1581/2011-4. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 July 2013 given in Case R 1581/2011-4.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The word mark ‘ARGENTARIA’ for goods and services in Classes 1 to 42 — Community trade mark No 159 707

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the cancellation proceedings closed following the surrender of the contested services by the CTM proprietor

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal as inadmissible

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51 (1)(a) and 80 CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---