alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

KPMG LLP

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
EDO Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
2-69243, 33-1526, 33-28020 and 333-77865 on Form S-8 of EDO Corporation of our
report dated February 15, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
EDO Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of EDO
Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
February 28, 2000
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. . § 1350 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 4, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /S/
NORBERT E. WOODHAMS
Norbert E. Woodhams
October 25, 2004
 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the
undersigned Principal Financial Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarter ended September 4, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /S/ JOSEPH W. MEYERS
Joseph W. Meyers
October 25, 2004
 33
No. 10-6817.

#### James L. McCurry, Petitioner v. David Mills, Warden.

562 U.S. 1093, 131 S. Ct. 800,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9462.

178 L. Ed. 2d 535,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jack C. BridgesJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentMarch 31, 2005Date
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00405-CR

Robert Paul MCDANIEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-CR-6850

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2010 

AFFIRMED

Appellant pled true to violating the conditions of his deferred adjudication community

supervision. His guilt was adjudicated, and he was sentenced to five years’ confinement, less credit

for time served, and a fine of $1,200. Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing

a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Counsel concludes the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief and
04-09-00405-CR

-2-

informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954

S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.

1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appellant did not file a pro se brief. 

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without

merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is

granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. 

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40713 Summary Calendar

__________________ WILLIE CRAWFORD BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT; J. ZELLER; J. FENNIMORE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-145

- - - - - - - - - - January 30, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William Crawford Bennett appeals from the district court's order denying his request for a preliminary injunction. Bennett requested, among other relief, that the district court grant him a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction restraining prison officials from retaliating against him or transferring him during the pendency of the suit. The record indicates that Bennett has been transferred; nevertheless, Bennett does not mention any injury resulting fromNo. 95-40713 -2- the transfer in his appeal. Accordingly, that issue has been waived. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (issues which are not briefed are waived). Bennett's other issues concern incidents or conditions on the Chase Field West Unit. As Bennett has been moved from that unit without objection, those issues are moot. See Powell v. McCormack , 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969) ("Simply stated, a case is moot when the issues presented are no longer `live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome."). Because the issue is moot, the appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Bennett has not shown that he requires the appointment of counsel on appeal; therefore, his motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Bennett's request for publication is also DENIED, as his case does not meet the criteria for publication. Bennett is cautioned that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Bennett is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Silvio Perez, Appellant.

[47 NYS3d 915]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part) (Morgenstern, J.), rendered August 6, 2012, convicting him of attempted assault in the third degree, menacing in the third degree, and harassment in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the verdict was not supported by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the *831light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s guilt of attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00 [1]; see *People v Ward,*120 AD3d 1440, 1440-1441 [2014]), menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15; see *Matter of Monay W.,*33 AD3d 809, 810 [2006]), and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]; see *People v Rodriguez,*111 AD3d 856, 858 [2013]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see *People v Mateo, 2*NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to those crimes was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633, 643-644 [2006]).

Dillon, J.P., Austin, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
# C_2015198EN.01003502.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2015 — Hostel Tourist World v OHIM — WRI Nominees (HostelTouristWorld.com)

(Case T-566/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Community figurative mark HostelTouristWorld.com - Earlier international word mark HOSTELWORLD.COM - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Minimal inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion))

(2015/C 198/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hostel Tourist World, SL (Seville, Spain) (represented by: J. Bartrina Díaz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: WRI Nominees Ltd (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented initially by G. Kelly and A. Payne, solicitors, subsequently by A. Payne, J. Llevat Vallespinosa and J.-Y. Teindas Maillard, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 August 2013 (Case R 966/2012-4) concerning cancellation proceedings between the company WRI Nominees Ltd and Hostel Tourist World, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hostel Tourist World, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hostel Tourist World, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

1

---
No. 10-6673.

#### Steven M. Griggs, Petitioner v. Missouri, et al.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 657,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9183.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*492Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 595.
# Ground-breaking, DLA Aviation Operations Center

/ Published Oct. 19, 2015
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
On a crisp fall day, a ground-breaking ceremony was held on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, for the much anticipated construction of the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Operations Center in the paved area of I Road, directly in front of Building 31, C and D Bays.

The Oct. 15, 2015 ceremony was hosted by DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day.  Among those in attendance were Chesterfield County Administrator James Stegmaier; DLA Headquarters Installation Support Director Denise Miller; Elaine Lee, president of the Bellwood Women’s club; past DLA Aviation’s Hall of Fame inductees; and representing Congressman Randy Forbes’ Office, District Director, Western Region and District Military Liaison Ronald White. 

David Gibson, DLA Installation Support at Richmond site director, welcomed attendees, saying “We are very excited about this project.” The project has been in the works for about a decade. In 2005, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers helped conduct a Project Justification Document outlining the need for the building and the scope of the construction. From there it went to DLA Headquarters for approval, then to Congress and finally to the president.

Day told attendees he recognizes this has been a long journey that couldn’t have reached this point without the help of a lot of people touching the process. 

“It takes a team, thanks for coming to celebrate this part of the journey with us,” Day said. “I get the blessing of doing the groundbreaking, but like my predecessors who started the project, I won’t get to inhabit the building; my successor will.”

The five-story glass and brick structure, approved by Congress in January 2014, will replace Buildings 31 and 32 A-E Bays, include a new Center Restaurant, and connect to the existing Frank B. Lotts Conference Center.  In keeping with responsible financial stewardship, included in this phase is the installation of more than 200 geothermal wells which are part of an environmentally friendly, energy efficient system that lowers energy costs and helps DLA meet its federal energy goals. 

The Operations Center construction will be completed in three phases.  The ground-breaking ceremony officially begins Phase I construction, which is 252,000 square-feet and will house around 875 employees. 

Upon completion of Phase I, directorates that will occupy the building include: Customer Operations, Procurement Process Support, Business Process Support, Command Support, DLA Information Operations at Richmond, DLA Training; DLA Human Resources Services, DLA Distribution at Richmond, and the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1992. The projected move in date is late 2018 to early 2019.

Phase II and III are in the preliminary stages. The goal is to complete Phase II in 2019 and Phase III in 2021.

“It is going to be a great space to work in; one you will be very proud of,” said Day. “The energy efficient, state-of-the-art building will be move-in ready in just under three years.”
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Distribution Management Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leo Greenfield, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



October 21, 2002                                     /s/ Leo Greenfield
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Leo Greenfield
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1276 CA 10-02483 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

CAROLYN FLATTERY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF KEVIN FLATTERY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

KAILASH C. LALL, M.D., JOHN N. BRACH, M.D., CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM, DOING BUSINESS AS MERCY HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO, AND SOUTHTOWNS RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, LLC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

HAMSHER & VALENTINE, BUFFALO (RICHARD P. VALENTINE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, BUFFALO (ANN M. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT KAILASH C. LALL, M.D.
GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (SALLY J. BROAD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS JOHN N. BRACH, M.D. AND SOUTHTOWNS RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, LLC.
DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (AMY ARCHER FLAHERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM, DOING BUSINESS AS MERCY HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered September 7, 2010 in a medical malpractice action. The order granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2397 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2397

 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 16 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

Mr. Shelby (for himself and Mr. Heflin) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical 
 Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as the ``Claude Harris, Jr. Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Building Number 137 of the Tuscaloosa Veterans' Medical Center in 
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Claude 
Harris, Jr. Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Claude Harris, Jr. 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of CoBiz Financial Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   February 22, 2011 | /s/   Steven Bangert                   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                           | Steven   Bangert                       |
|                           | Chairman   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 09-1227.

#### Carol Anne Bond, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1038, 131 S. Ct. 589,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8806.

178 L. Ed. 2d 429,

November 10, 2010.

Stephen R. McAl-lister, Esquire, of Lawrence, Kansas, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.
No. 10-6948.

#### Louis Francis, Petitioner v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 910,

178 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 434.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 09-10488.

#### Douglas Frechette, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 594,

178 L. Ed. 2d 452,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8924.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 374.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Theundersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qto which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.

 

 
| Date:  November 4, 2005 | /s/  Mark T. Frost                                       |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Name:  Mark T. Frost                                     |
|                         | Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09
- 1 9
- 00 154
- CV



### _________________ MARIA REVA WEST PRADO , Appellant
V. MARIA DE LOURDES AYALA LEAL , Appellee

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284 th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16
- 12
- 13925
- CV

________________________________________________________________________ ORDER The a ppellant, Maria Reva West Prado, filed a notice of appeal and a motion for temporary relief from the trial court’s final judgment. The a ppellee, Maria de Lourdes Ayala Lea l, filed a response to the mot i on for temporary relief. The trial court’s judgment directs the District Clerk to disburse 98.16 percent of funds in the trial court’s registry by check made payable to Augustina Prado Diaz to be sent by Federal Express to h er address in Mexico, orders that the thirty

- day2 waiting period for disbursement of funds from the registry be waived, and orders that the f u nds be disbursed immediately. The trial court’s order does not provide an opportunity to supersede the judgment.
T he Court finds that a temporary order is necessary to protect this Court’s appellate jurisdiction over the trial court’s judgment. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West Supp. 2018). It is, therefore, ORDERED that enforcement of the trial court’s judg ment, including sending a check payable to Augustina Prado Diaz by Federal Express to an address in Mexico, is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this Court. The Court directs the parties to file responses stating their positions reg arding whether the trial court’s judgment is subject to being superseded by statute or under Rule 24 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 24. The responses must be filed with the Court by May 31 , 2019.
ORDER ENTERED May 21 , 201 9

. PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
# Agency director observes Army divestiture efforts

/ Published April 8, 2016
FORT BLISS, Texas,