alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Eaken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2003     /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                         Principal Executive Officer
                         Principal Financial Officer
S91A1517.

#### ROBERTS v. THE STATE.

(411 SE2d 496)

Weltner, Presiding Justice.

Michael Roberts stabbed Anthony Brown to death, and wounded Steven Williams. He was convicted by a jury of felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony.1

1. The trial court did not err in refusing to excuse for cause a potential juror who was a clerk in the office of the magistrate who had issued the warrant for Roberts’ arrest. The potential juror stated that she was unaware of any of the circumstances in the case, and that her mind was free of bias. We decline to extend the ruling in *Beam v. State,*260 Ga. 784 (2) (400 SE2d 327) (1991), which involved a secretarial employee of the district attorney who was prosecuting the case. A magistrate’s function, by contrast, is not prosecutorial but judicial, and that function must be discharged impartially. See *Connally v. Georgia,*429 U. S. 245 (97 SC 546, 50 LE2d 444) (1977) (justice of peace cannot be paid more for issuing warrant than for denying warrant).

2. Roberts insists that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal on the ground that the state failed *814to prove the essential element of the cause of death. Roberts admitted that he stabbed the victims, and eyewitnesses testified to those events. A detective testified without objection that he observed the deceased victim bleeding and receiving medical treatment; and that the victim had died as a result of the stab wounds.

Decided January 9, 1992.

*Blackburn, Bright & Edwards, J. Converse Bright, William D. Edwards,*for appellant.

*H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Bradford M. Shealy, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,*for appellee.

OCGA § 24-9-65 provides:

> Where the question under examination, and to be decided by the jury, shall be one of opinion, any witness may swear to his opinion or belief, giving his reasons therefor. If the issue shall be as to the existence of a fact, the opinions of witnesses shall be generally inadmissible.

The evidence is sufficient under *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Clarke, C. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham and Fletcher, JJ., concur.*

1

 The offenses occurred on September 19, 1990. Roberts was indicted on December 10, 1990. He was found guilty on March 28, 1991, and was sentenced on April 18, 1991. A notice of appeal was filed on May 13, 1991. The appeal was docketed on August 15, 1991, and submitted on briefs on September 27, 1991.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36037-36038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985. 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 
(43 FR 133359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 
27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985).

ACTION: I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibit, ``Saints and Sinners: Caravaggio's Italy'' imported from 
abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. This object is imported pursuant 
to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit object at McMullen Museum 
of Art, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA from on or about January 26, 
1999

[[Page 36038]]

through May 24, 1999, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Manning, Assistant General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, 202/619-5997, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: June 25, 1998.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-17529 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
### -82 -80 -78 -76 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Torres, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 552]

Judgment of resen-tence, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered November 8, 2010, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to a term of 10 years, followed by 5 years of postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease *564supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 44086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

38th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirty-eighth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 15-19 2014, 10:00 a.m.--11:30 
a.m. (Central Time).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at National Weather Service, 120 
David L. Boren Blvd. Norman, OK 73072.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or Sophie Bousquet, sbousquet@rtca.org, 202-330-0663.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 206. The agenda will 
include the following:

September 15, 10:00 a.m.

Opening Plenary
 Opening remarks: DFO, Chairman, and Host
 Attendees' introductions
 Review and approval of meeting agenda, Action item review
 Approval of previous (DC) meeting minutes
 Industry Presentations

September 16, 8:30 a.m.

 Sub-Groups meetings

10:00 a.m.

 SG6: SE2020 Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) Turbulence Project

September 17, 8:30 a.m.

     Sub-Groups meetings

September 18, 8:30 a.m.

 Plenary: AC 00-45 Update

9:00 a.m.

 Plenary: SG-5 FIS-B MOPS Review
(Sub-Group meetings will occur if review ends early)

1:00 p.m.

 Sub-Group Meetings (Plenary: SG-5 FIS-B MOPS Review, if needed

September 19, 8:30 a.m.

Closing Plenary
 Sub-Groups' Reports
[cir] Decision to Approve FIS-B MOPS for FRAC Release
 TOR Changes
 Action item review
 Future meeting plans and dates
 Industry Coordination & Presentations
 Other business

11:30 a.m.

 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 22 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-17817 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17159]



[[Page 35203]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Test and Evaluation

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Test and Evaluation 
will meet in closed session on July 14-15, 1998 at Strategic Analysis, 
Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will review the entire range of activities relating to Test and 
Evaluation and recommend new and innovative ways that the T&E community 
can better support the warfighter.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-17159 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 10-6823.

#### Luis Estrada-Eliverio, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 579,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8729.

178 L. Ed. 2d 423,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 669.
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 AMENDMENT OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS 
  
 WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”) has authority to amend the Plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board deems it desirable to amend the Plan in light of the passage of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004; 
  
 RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended effective as of January 1, 2005, as
follows. 
  
 5. A new Section 3.04 is added to the Plan to read
as follows: 
  
 “3.04 Notwithstanding any
other provisions of this Plan, no amounts earned after December 31, 2004, may be deferred under the Plan, and no election to defer may be made after December 31, 2004.” 
  
 6. A new Section 4.05(c) is added to the Plan to read as follows: 
  
 “(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan,
no distribution election may be made after December 31, 2004. If no distribution election is made, distribution of the Participant’s memorandum account shall be made in accordance with subsection (a) above.” 
  
 The Plan shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. The Plan shall be restated as of
the date of adoption of this amendment to incorporate this and all prior amendments. 
  
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are each hereby authorized and empowered on behalf and in the name of the Company to take all such further actions, to execute all such other agreements, instruments
and documents, pay all such taxes, fees and expenses, and do such other acts and things as such officer or officers, in his, her or their discretion shall deem necessary or expedient for the accomplishment of the purposes of the foregoing
resolutions, and any actions already taken for the purposes of accomplishing the foregoing resolutions are hereby ratified and approved. 
  
 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation 
 Meeting of the Board of Directors

 December 9, 2004