alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015155EN.01000601.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-182/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 - Likelihood of confusion))

(2015/C 155/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Sets aside paragraph 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Mega Brands v OHIM — Diset (MAGNEXT) (T-604/11 and T-292/12, EU:T:2014:56); |
| --- | --- |

1)

Sets aside paragraph 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Mega Brands v OHIM — Diset (MAGNEXT) (T-604/11 and T-292/12, EU:T:2014:56);

| 2) | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3) | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
# C_2013207EN.01003802.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/38

---

Action brought on 29 April 2013 — Castell Macía v OHIM — PJ Hungary (PEPE CASTELL)

(Case T-242/13)

2013/C 207/64

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Castell Macía (Elche, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda, H. Mosback and G. Macias Bonilla, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) (Budapest, Hungary)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 February 2013 in Case R 1401/2012-1 so as to dismiss the opposition filed and grant the Community trade mark application No 6 798 862‘PEPE CASTELL’, and order the opponent to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 February 2013 in Case R 1401/2012-1 so as to dismiss the opposition filed and grant the Community trade mark application No 6 798 862‘PEPE CASTELL’, and order the opponent to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings;

| — | order OHIM, as defendant, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in the present action; |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM, as defendant, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in the present action;

| — | if necessary, order the intervener to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, order the intervener to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: José Castell Macía

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PEPE CASTELL’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 6 798 862

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark with word elements ‘Pepe Jeans FOOTWEAR’ for goods in Class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15663]



[[Page 32200]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-576-000]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 8, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 29, 1998, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc. (Williams), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in Docket 
No. CP98-576-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) to 
abandon, by sale, certain facilities in Woods County, Oklahoma, under 
William's blanket certificates issued in Docket No. CP82-474-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Williams states that it would abandon by sale to Sigma-Level-Aurora 
Joint Venture, L.L.C. dba Aurora Field Services, L.L.C. (Aurora) 
approximately 5.2 miles of the 8-inch Waynoka lateral pipeline.
    No service, it is said, would be abandoned as a result of the 
proposal.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15663 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.22 - ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Addendum (the "Addendum") is made effective as of the 12th day  of
December,  2001 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and  Philip  A.  Garcia
effective as of December 16, 1997.

         WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest  of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  has   previously
considered  and agreed to extend  the term of the  Agreement  from its  original
term; and

         WHEREAS, the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  at its meeting of
December  11, 2001 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

          1.  Paragraph 1 of the  Agreement  with  respect to the Term is hereby
          amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2003.

          2. All other  terms and  conditions  of the  Agreement  remain in full
          force and effect.



ATTEST:                                 ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/  Jan R. Van Gorder                  By: /s/  F. William Hirt
     Jan R. Van Gorder                           F. William Hirt
     Secretary                                   Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/  Sheila M. Hirsch                       /s/  Philip A. Garcia
     Sheila M. Hirsch                            Philip A. Garcia
     Executive Secretary                         786 Stockbridge Drive
                                                 Fairview, PA   16505


                                       37
No. 10-580.

#### Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Oscar Mayer Foods Division, Petitioner v. Jeff Spoerle, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.

562 U.S. 1137, 131 S. Ct. 933,

178 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 166.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 427.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36259-36260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UT-060-08-1040-00]


Moratorium on Issuance of New Commercial Permits and Rights-of-
Way in Mill Creek Canyon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior.

ACTION: Notice of moratorium on authorization of new commercial permits 
and rights of way for Mill Creek Canyon pending completion of a special 
management plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice places a moratorium on issuance of all new 
commercial permits including new special recreation and filming permits 
and rights of way authorized by the Moab Field Office for Mill Creek 
Canyon near Moab, Utah. This action is implemented under the authority 
of 43 CFR 2800, 2920 and 8372.
    Increased recreation and other use of public lands in Mill Creek 
Canyon has adversely impacted wildlife, vegetation, soil, water 
quality, visual and cultural resources and poses a threat to public 
health and safety and enjoyment of the lands. This area encompasses 
lands under BLM management within one-quarter (1/4) mile of the stream, 
from the public land boundary west of the Power Dam to the Forest 
Service boundary, in both forks of the canyon including Rill Canyon.
    The purpose and need for preparation of a special management plan 
for the area has been determined through public scoping. To prevent 
foreclosure of management options in that plan, issuance of additional 
special recreation and filming permits, rights-of-way, and all other 
commercial use permits is hereby suspended. Limiting new permits is one 
way to control future resource damage, ensure the sustainability of 
existing resources, and allow unhindered consideration and possible 
adoption of use ceilings, pending completion of the management plan.

[[Page 36260]]

    It will also respond to public requests for limitations on 
commercial uses, rights-of-way, or any publicized use of the area 
pending completion of the plan. No limitation or suspension of existing 
permits is created by this moratorium nor is any limitation created 
affecting previously pending permits or rights-of-way. This notice does 
not affect existing or future authorizations on the Flat Pass Trail.
    Maps of the moratorium area are available in the Moab Field Office.

DATES: This restriction shall remain in effect pending revision of the 
resource management plan for the Grand Resource Area or completion of a 
special management plan for South Mill Creek Canyon or until updated by 
the authorized officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad Palmer, Moab Field Office, 82 
East Dogwood Avenue, Moab, Utah 84532 at (435) 259-6111.

    Dated: June 22, 1998
Brad Palmer,
Acting Moab Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-17653 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
<PAGE>

                                EATON CORPORATION
                         2008 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                   ITEM 15(B)
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

This written statement is submitted in accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It accompanies Eaton Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("10-K Report").

I hereby certify that, based on my knowledge, the 10-K Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C 78m), and information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Eaton Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Date: February 27, 2009                 /s/ Richard H. Fearon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard H. Fearon
                                        Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
                                        and Planning Officer
No. 10-7192.

#### Heriberto Castrillo-Rubio, aka Albert Salazar-Rubio, aka Heriberto Castrillo, aka Eddie Castrillo, aka Eduardo Rubio, aka Heriberto Castillo-Rubio, aka Eddie Rubio, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1183, 131 S. Ct. 1002,

178 L. Ed. 2d 834,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 848.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 431.
No. 10-6729.

#### Leslie Charles Cohen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 855,

178 L. Ed. 2d 585,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9602.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 544, 178 L. Ed. 2d 399, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8353.
# Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna hosts Force Protection Lecture Series  

/ Published March 22, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna recently hosted a force protection lecture series which highlighted active shooter response teams, featuring guest speaker Derrick Boucher, FBI supervisory special agent-in-charge of the Philadelphia Division’s Harrisburg field office.

Timothy Moore, Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna’s anti-terrorism officer, introduced the event.  Rob Montefour, Installation Support at Susquehanna site director, provided opening remarks, and discussed the importance of emergency preparedness through education and application.  

Following the opening remarks, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., commander Army Col. Corey New addressed the audience and explained the need for trust and dependence on installation security subject matter experts.  He indicated that although Susquehanna has been fortunate to not have experienced an active shooter incident, perhaps it is because of the diligence of security experts and vigilance of personnel assigned to the installation.  

Boucher then spoke about active shooter incidents and the importance of response team action.  He shared statistics and introduced the short film, “The Coming Storm.”  The film dramatized an active shooter incident at an American university, and emphasized how to manage an event, which includes taking witness interviews, setting up family assistance centers, speaking with media, providing unified police action, and providing survivor support.

Following the film, installation security experts Henry Hoffman, fire chief, Doug Schraeder, police chief, and Dave Koons, chief security manager, discussed their roles and fielded questions.

Amy Snyder, deputy chief for security and emergency services, closed out the lecture series by encouraging everyone to reflect upon, take back, and share the information with others.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 99-31174

Summary Calendar

Civil Docket #98-CR-60027-2

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH ROBICHEAUX,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

_________________________________________________________________

February 2, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Robicheaux has

moved for leave to withdrawn and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In response to

counsel’s motion, Robicheaux has raised several appellate issues,

including claims that counsel performed ineffectively at trial and

at sentencing, and he moves this court to appoint new appellate
2

counsel. The motion for appointment of new appellate counsel is

DENIED.

We pretermit consideration of Robicheaux’s ineffective

counsel arguments because the record is not adequately developed

for appellate review. United States v. Chavez-Valencia, 116 F.3d

127, 133-34 (5th Cir. 1997). Robicheaux’s responses, counsel’s

brief, and our independent review of the record reveal no other

potentially nonfrivolous issue. Consequently, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein. Robicheaux’s claims of ineffective

counsel are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his ability to raise the

issues on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 review. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sagient Research
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 16, 2004                      By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name:   Brian M. Overstreet
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer

                                       26

================================================================================
No. 10-635.

#### Township of Liberty, Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Wedgewood Limited Partnership I.

562 U.S. 1179, 131 S. Ct. 1007,

178 L. Ed. 2d 828,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 749.

January 18, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 610 F.3d 340.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,646
<PP&E>                                         153,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,260
<BONDS>                                        158,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,819
<SALES>                                         47,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,314
<CGS>                                           38,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.5



Exhibit 10.5 



RESOLVED:
that the fifth paragraph of Section 3.2 of the Illinois Tool Works Inc. Executive
Contributory Retirement Income Plan is hereby amended to delete the first three sentences
and to read in full as follows: 



“An eligible Participant must complete
 a separate Agreement for each deferral period.”