alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013207EN.01005803.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/58

---

Action brought on 16 April 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-35/13)

2013/C 207/98

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to calculate accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service with the Commission on the basis of the new General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare unlawful Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare unlawful Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | annul the decisions of 28 September and 4 October 2012 to calculate accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before he took up his post, in connection with the transfer of those rights into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, on the basis of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of 28 September and 4 October 2012 to calculate accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before he took up his post, in connection with the transfer of those rights into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, on the basis of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
How to Talk to Students About Vaping

As an educator, you play an important role in the 

lives of your students. You can make a real difference 

by engaging in meaningful conversations about the 

dangers of e-cigarette use (also known as vaping) for 

young people and ways to quit. 

• Share that most students do not vape or use other 

tobacco products—and most students who vape 

want to quit. 

• Provide students with tips for coping with stress in 

healthy ways, such as physical activity, the arts, and 

connecting with nature. 

• Acknowledge the social pressure to vape that students 

might be facing from peers, social media, enticing 

flavors, and targeted ads from the tobacco industry.

• Encourage students who vape to quit.

• Encourage them to tap into their support system by 

reaching out to family, friends, or educators who can 

help them quit. 

Resources to Help Young People Quit

Encourage students to talk with their doctor or school nurse and connect with 

support services like: 

Smokefree Teen from the National Cancer Institute has information, tips, tools, 

and live web-based support for teens interested in quitting tobacco use: 

Teen.smokefree.gov.

SmokefreeTXT for Teens is a text-based program from the National Cancer 

Institute to help young people quit tobacco use: Teen.smokefree.gov/txt-teen.

1-800-QUIT-NOW connects teens to their state quitline where they can 

get free and confidential support from a quit coach and get connected to 

additional resources: CDC.gov/Quitline.

To learn more, visit CDC.gov/Vaping. The Empower Vape-Free Youth wordmark and logo 

are trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and 

Human Services (HHS). Use of these marks without 

prior authorization by HHS is strictly prohibited.
Health Impacts of Vaping: Quick Facts 

• The use of tobacco products in any form, 

including vapes, is unsafe for kids, teens, 

and young adults.

• Most vapes contain nicotine, which is highly 

addictive and can harm adolescent brain 

development. Adolescent brain development 

continues until about age 25.

• Nicotine exposure during adolescence can 

impact students’ learning, mood, and attention.

• The aerosol from vapes can contain harmful 

and potentially harmful substances, including:

∙ Cancer-causing chemicals

∙ Heavy metals (such as nickel, tin, or lead)

∙ Ultrafine particles

∙ Flavorings such as diacetyl (a chemical 

linked to serious lung disease)

• When a person becomes addicted to nicotine 

and stops using it, their body and brain 

must get used to not having nicotine. This 

can result in temporary symptoms of 

withdrawal, including feeling anxious or 

depressed or having trouble concentrating. 

Youth might keep using nicotine to help 

relieve these symptoms.

• Youth might turn to vaping to try to deal with 

stress or anxiety, creating a cycle of nicotine 

dependence. But nicotine addiction can also 

be a source of stress. 

To learn more, visit CDC.gov/Vaping.

September 2023
#### R. J. Hutchins, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. Curtis M. Brown, *Defendant in Error.*

144 So. 655.

Division A.

Decision filed November 21, 1932.

*Ferguson*cfe *Fussell, Robert G. Gilroy*and *Dixie L. Her-long,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred Paradise*and *J. A. Dewberry,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel, it is the opinion of the court that there is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment of the court below will accordingly be and the same is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William C. Andrews, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                 |  |                       
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: October 28, 2011 |  | By:                                             |  | /s/ William C. Andrews
|                       |  | Name: William C. Andrews                       
|                       |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer                 
|                       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of
|                       |  | Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001065189
<NAME> REXFORD, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,436
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       187,927
<OTHER-SE>                                   (205,363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (17,436)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 2-69243) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-01526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation
1983 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive
Plan, the EDO Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-9 No. 33-77865)
pertaining to the EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO
Corporation 1997 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation
1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-88620) relating to the issuance by EDO Corporation of its 5.25% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2007, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-105265) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 2002 Long-term Incentive Plan of EDO
Corporation and in the related prospectus of our reports dated February 23,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EDO
Corporation, EDO Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of EDO Corporation, included in this Annual
report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
July 27, 2005
# As school year begins, Subsistence continues produce support for students

/ Published Sept. 8, 2016
Philadelphia, 

As another school year starts, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support is set to provide fresh produce for students at approximately 12,000 schools throughout the U.S.

DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain operates the DOD Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, which supports 48 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam. 

The Defense Department program enables schools that participate in the Department of Agriculture’s National School Lunch Program to use food entitlement dollars to buy fresh produce.

“This has been a great partnership between the USDA and the Defense Logistics Agency,” said Patricia Scott, division chief of garrison feeding in Subsistence. “It really shows where two federal agencies can work together for a mutual program.”

The program began in 1993 as Subsistence provided $3.2 million in produce to schools in eight states. That grew to $198 million of produce last year. And $227 million has been allocated for the program so far this year, Scott said. 

Several factors contribute to the success of the program, including the customer service that Subsistence provides, flexibility, and the variety and quality of products, Scott said.

“We provide all the contracting oversight, invoice reconciliation, audits of the prime vendor facilities and provide customer service if they have any issues,” said Scott.

The DoD Fresh Program is voluntary and allows states to participate and leave the program at any time. 

Virginia left the program in the 1990s, but re-enrolled for the 2007-2008 school year, said Jeri Thornton, program coordinator for food distribution in the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

“What brought us back to the program was the understanding that shipping and billing would be easier and better than it was in the past,” said Thornton. 

Schools can choose from a variety of produce, including apples, melons, peaches, lettuces, salad mixes, onions, peppers and potatoes. 

Working with the schools makes Scott feel connected to the local community, especially in the Philadelphia area where DLA Troop Support is located. Pennsylvania has allocated $2.5 million to the program for this year.

“The school folks are just great to work with, especially now that we have Pennsylvania, it is kind of exciting to talk to people that could be in your own community,” said Scott. “Since we have our Subsistence field reps that live in Denver, or California or Orlando, they are talking to people in their community. So you really feel connected in that way.”

Schools interested in learning more may contact their state distributing agency or the DLA service representative.
# Employee Spotlight: Erin Albers

/ Published May 1, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee Spotlight focuses on outstanding non-supervisory Defense Logistics Agency personnel across DLA Aviation and at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may nominate employees to be featured in this column by contacting DLA Aviation Public Affairs at Avn.PAO@DLA.mil.*

**Name:** Erin Albers

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of service:** Five years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically and how do you support the warfighter?**I am an inventory management specialist, and I provide material support by assisting with status updates on purchase requests and contract expedites, bringing in lateral material from other depots and submitting emergency buys for organic manufacture packages for the Air Force to manufacture parts that can’t be obtained by any other means. I also brief our command weekly on our Depot Repair Enhancement Program by relaying the most recent actions we are taking to resolve back orders.

**What do you like most about your job?** I like the people I work with. We are a close team and are always willing to help each other, whether learning new systems, researching purchase request or contract statuses, or helping cover if someone is out. Our supervisor takes the time to teach us, so we are set up for success us so and can progress in our careers.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?**Being able to resolve an immediate need from a warfighter gives me the most personal satisfaction. When missing materiel threatens or causes a work-stoppage, and we locate the material at other depots or through an emergency buy to fill that need until the contract delivers is very rewarding to me!

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** I would tell them how much I appreciate what they do. As a U.S. Army veteran, I understand how hard it is to be away from your family for an extended length of time and the high level of stress it can cause you and your family.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** My kids and I love going to watch University of Central Oklahoma hockey games. Our game night usually starts with going to our favorite pizza spot near the rink. We like to get to the game early so the kids can see the players warm up and, hopefully, get a puck from one of the players. Then, after the game, we stay late to see the players come out of the locker room to visit with the fans, sign autographs and take pictures with them. The kids love to get their picture taken with their favorite players.

**What is the most surprising/unexpected thing others don’t know about you?**I played high school ice hockey for Midwest City High School my senior year, which was the only year our school had a hockey team.

**Who is the most influential person in your life?** I would have to say my mom and dad are because they have always been there for me to offer their advice on life situations and have kept me in their prayers.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: May 17, 2010/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1674** 

CHRISTOPHER SMITH , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : August 20, 2013 Decided: September 6, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Christopher Smith, Petitioner Pro Se

. Matthew Albert Connelly , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Smith, a native and citizen of Jamaica,
petiti on s for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s decision denying his requests for withholding of removal
and withholding under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have thor oughly reviewed the record, including the transcript

of Smith’s merits hearing, and Smith’s supporting affidavit and

other evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not
compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings
of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial
evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias

–
Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 2, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128029 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LYNAE J. KUPER, Pers Robert P. Young, Jr. onal Representative of Stephen J. Markman, The Estate of Mark Kuper, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128029 

 COA: 250952 
 Kent CC: 01-006518-NH 

METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, PAUL R. 

DWYER, M.D., and LEONARD A. LEWIS, JR., 

D.O., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, KELLY, and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

t1026 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 2, 2005 

Clerk
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00162

- CV

ROBERT LARRY STEPHEN S AS PERSONAL

REPRESENTATIVE AND HEIR OF THE

ESTATE OF MARY VIRGI NIA STEPHENS,

JAMES STEPHENS, AND KENNETH STEPHENS

, Appellant s

v.

BYRUM RANCH LLC

, Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 71396

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified the parties in an A pril 8 , 201 1 letter that the

appellants ’ brief was overdue in this cause and that the appeal may be dismissed if a

response s howing grounds for continuing the appeal was not filed within twenty

- one

days. No response has been received.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.Stephens v. Byrum Ranch LLC Page 2

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Just ice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opini on delivered and filed May 18, 2011

[CV06]
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley* Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that based on his knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Robert C. Stempel                            

Robert C. Stempel

Chief Executive Officer

January 4, 2006

 

 

/s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg                        

Stephan W. Zumsteg

Chief Financial Officer

January 4, 2006