alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-958-1430-01; GP7-0182; OR-19080]


Public Land Order No. 7347; Revocation of Executive Order Dated 
August 2, 1916; OR

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes an Executive order in its entirety as to 
the remaining 24.38 acres withdrawn for Bureau of Land Management 
Powersite Reserve No. 537. The lands are no longer needed for the 
purpose for which they were withdrawn. This action will remove 
restrictions on 6.25 acres of public lands that were subject to the 
provisions of Section 24 of the Federal Power Act. These lands will 
remain closed to the agricultural land laws due to an overlapping 
withdrawal. The remaining 18.13 acres have been conveyed out of Federal 
ownership with a reservation of all minerals to the United States.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Bliesner, BLM Oregon/Washington 
State Office, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208-2965, 503-952-6157.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Executive Order dated August 2, 1916, which established 
Powersite Reserve No. 537, is hereby revoked in its entirety:

Willamette Meridian

(a) Public Lands

T. 2 S., R. 7 E.,
    Sec. 33, lots 11, 21, 22, 27, and 28.

(b) Non-Federal Surface

T. 2 S., R. 7 E.,
    Sec. 33, lots 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 30, 
31, 32, and 34.

    The areas described aggregate 24.38 acres in Clackamas County.

    2. The lands described in paragraph 1(b) have been conveyed out of 
Federal ownership with a reservation of all minerals to the United 
States.
    3. The lands described in paragraph 1(a) have been open to 
operation of the public land laws, subject to the provisions of Section 
24 of the Federal Power Act of June 10, 1920, and will be relieved of 
such restrictions at 8:30 a.m. on July 1, 1998. These lands have been 
and will remain open to mining and mineral leasing.
    4. The lands described in paragraph 1(a) remain withdrawn from all 
forms of appropriation under the agricultural land laws, 43 U.S.C. Ch. 
9; 25 U.S.C. 331 (1994), by Public Land Order No. 5490, as modified by 
Public Land Order Nos. 5542 and 7043.

    Dated: June 18, 1998.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-17463 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7868

ROBERT LEE ELMORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusBARNEY LLOYD, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-01-956-9-19RB) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Elmore, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Elmore seeks to appeal from the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) without prejudice because he failed to exhaust state court remedies. Because Elmore can exhaust his statecourt remedies and re-file his petition, his appeal of the dismissal without prejudice is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392 ,10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500
100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
# C_2013274EN.01001801.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/18

---

Action brought on 10 July 2013 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC intimate)

(Case T-363/13)

2013/C 274/30

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Harper Hygienics S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Clinique Laboratories LLC (New York, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2013 (Case R 606/2012-5) in so far as it refuses registration of ‘CLEANIC intimate’ as a Community trade mark for all goods in Classes 3 and 16 and for certain goods in Class 5; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2013 (Case R 606/2012-5) in so far as it refuses registration of ‘CLEANIC intimate’ as a Community trade mark for all goods in Classes 3 and 16 and for certain goods in Class 5;

| — | amend the contested decision by registering the trade mark for all goods and services applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision by registering the trade mark for all goods and services applied for;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative trade mark containing the word elements ‘CLEANIC intimate’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 16 — Application No 009 217 531 for a Community trade mark

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Clinique Laboratories LLC

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade marks No 54 429 for goods in Classes 3, 14, 25 and 42 and No 2 294 429 for goods in Classes 35 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) as regards establishment of the similarity of the trade marks and of the likelihood of confusion on the part of consumers, and breach of Article 8(5) of that regulation

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 18, 2013

NO. 03-13-00284-CV

K. O., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the order of the trial court is 

in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that appellant has filed an affidavit 

of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of appeal be assessed against 

appellant; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Tuberculosis (TB) spreads 

through the air from one 

person to another.

• TB germs spread when a person with infectious 

TB disease coughs, speaks, or sings. 

• TB germs usually attack the lungs but can 

also move to any part of the body.

TB germs can live in the body without 

making you sick.

This is called latent TB infection or inactive TB. 

• TB germs can live in your body for years without causing symptoms. Without 

treatment, inactive TB can develop into active TB disease and make you sick.

• If you have inactive TB, you can take TB medicine to prevent 

of active TB disease even if you do not feel sick.

the development 

If your body cannot stop TB 

germs from growing, you 

develop active TB disease. 

• You may feel sick and spread TB germs to 

your family, friends, and others around you. 

• You need to take and finish all your 

TB medicine to help you feel better and 

prevent other people from getting sick. 

Symptoms of active TB disease:

Cough lasting 

3+ weeks

Coughing up blood or 

sputum (phlegm from 

deep inside the lungs)

Chest pain Weakness 

or fatigue

No appetite Weight loss Fever and/or chills Night sweats

Take and finish all of 

your TB medicine to kill 

TB germs and STOP TB!

Publication Number: 6474

Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention 

National Center for HIV,

Viral Hepatitis, STD, and 

TB Prevention
#### People v Terborg (Jeffrey)

App Div, 4th Dept: 2017 NY Slip Op 61437(U) (Monroe)

dismissed 3/27/17 (Stein, J.)
# C_2014151EN.01001902.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/19

---

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2014 — Hawe Hydraulik v OHIM — HaWi Energietechnik (HAWI)

(Case T-347/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 151/25

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hawe Hydraulik SE (Munich, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: HaWi Energietechnik AG (Eggenfelden, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 April 2013 (Case R 1690/2012-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Hawe Hydraulik SE and HaWi Energietechnik AG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs, and to pay the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs, and to pay the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer     

---



QuickLinks
# C_2016078EN.01003501.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/35

---

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2015 — BT Limited Belgian Branch v Commission

(Case T-335/13) (1)

1

(2016/C 078/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 24.8.2013.

1

---
# C_2015302EN.01004901.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-561/13) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Rural development programme for Galicia (2007 2013) - Rural development support measures - Compensation payments for natural handicaps - Expenses incurred by Spain - On-the-spot checks - Obligation to carry out a census of animals - Article 10(2) and (4) and Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 - Article 35(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 - Default procedure))

(2015/C 302/63)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially N. Díaz Abad, then M. Sampol Pucurull, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/433/EU of 13 August 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 219, p. 49) in so far as it concerns expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain amounting to EUR 7 57  968,97.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17572]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS)

Administration on Aging
[Program Announcement No. AoA-98-7]


Fiscal Year 1998 Program Announcement; Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Announcement of availability of funds and request for 
applications to carry out the functions of a National Eldercare 
Locator.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging (AoA) announces that under this 
program announcement it will hold a competition for a cooperative 
agreement award for a National Eldercare Locator. The deadline date for 
the submission of applications is August 26, 1998. Public and/or 
nonprofit agencies, organizations, and institutions are eligible to 
apply under this program announcement. To be considered for funding, 
however, applicants must demonstrate a proven track record of 
experience in conducting national hotlines and dealing with the network 
of State and Area Agencies on Aging and State and Area Information and 
Referral Services. Coalitions of organizations are encouraged.
    Application kits are available by writing to the Department of 
Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of State and 
Community Programs, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 4747, Washington, 
DC 20201, telephone: (202) 619-0011 or (202) 619-3955.

    Dated: June 26, 1998.
Jeanette C. Takamura,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 98-17572 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-40-P
# C_2013336EN.01002803.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/28

---

Action brought on 23 September 2013 — Braun Melsungen v OHIM (SafeSet)

(Case T-513/13)

2013/C 336/61

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: B. Braun Melsungen AG (Melsungen, Germany) (represented by M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013;

| — | Alter the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 so that the preceding rejection decision of OHIM of 25 June 2012 is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 so that the preceding rejection decision of OHIM of 25 June 2012 is annulled;

| — | Alter the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 so that the registration procedure is continued; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 so that the registration procedure is continued;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SafeSet’ for goods in Class 10 — Community trade mark application No 10 549 368

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and (c), 7(2), 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit
        12.2**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  I,
        Kenneth Fowler, certify that:
  1.  I
        have
        reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Zindart Limited;
  2.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
        fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in
        light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
        with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
        in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
        results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
        presented in this report;
  4.  The
        company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
        maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
        Rules
        13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
  a)  Designed
        such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
        and
        procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
        information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
        is
        made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period
        in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated
        the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and
        presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
        disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
        this
        report based on such evaluation; and
  c)  Disclosed
        in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial
        reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
        has
        materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s
        internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
        company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
        recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
        auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
        performing the equivalent function):
  a)  all
        significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
        of
        internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
        adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
        financial information; and
  b)  any
        fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
        who
        have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
        reporting.
  
  
  
 /s/  KEN
        FOWLER
 Kenneth
        Fowler
 *Chief
        Financial Officer*
  Dated:
        July 11, 2005
#### People v Guadalupe

App Div, 2d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 88670(U) (Orange)

dismissed 3/31/17 (Fahey, J.)