alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:22 AM

To: 'jon@jrupprechtlaw.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Camera Copters, Inc. (FAA-2015-1100)

June 11, 2015 

Dear Mr. Rupprecht: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1100). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 25, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
No. 09-11221.

#### Azewen-Jik Kante, Petitioner v. Nike, Inc.

562 U.S. 1124, 131 S. Ct. 851,

178 L. Ed. 2d 582,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9614.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 162, 178 L. Ed. 2d 96, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6678.
No. 10-7019.

#### Daniel Earl Eyster, aka Daniel Eyster, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1051, 131 S. Ct. 618,

178 L. Ed. 2d 448,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8850.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 180.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2526

To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800 numbers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. SIMON) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800

numbers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the following:

5 (1) Reforms required by the Telephone Disclo6 sure and Dispute Resolution Act (Public Law 102–

7 556) have improved the reputation of the pay-per8 call industry and resulted in regulations that have

9 reduced the incidence of misleading practices that

10 are harmful to the public interest.
2

•S 2526 IS

1 (2) Among the successful reforms is a prohibi2 tion on charges being assessed for calls to 800 tele3 phone numbers or other telephone numbers adver4 tised or widely understood to be toll free.

5 (3) Nevertheless, certain interstate pay-per-call

6 businesses are taking advantage of an exception in

7 the prohibition on charging for information conveyed

8 during a call to a ‘‘toll-free’’ number to continue to

9 engage in misleading practices. These practices are

10 not in compliance with the intent of Congress in

11 passing the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Reso12 lution Act.

13 (4) Therefore, it is necessary for Congress to

14 clarify that its intent is that charges for information

15 provided during a call to an 800 number or other

16 number widely advertised and understood to be toll

17 free shall not, under any circumstances, be included

18 or transmitted with a bill for telephone services.

19 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF

20 1934.

21 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 228(c)(6)(C) of the Com22 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 228(c)(6)(C)) is

23 amended by inserting before the semicolon the following:

24 ‘‘, except that nothing in this paragraph shall permit the

25 calling party to be charged for the information or the call
3

•S 2526 IS

1 by means of a charge included on, or transmitted with,

2 a bill for telephone exchange service or telephone toll serv3 ice’’.

4 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Federal Communications

5 Commission shall revise its regulations to comply with the

6 amendment made by subsection (a) of this section within

7 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 10-7029.

#### Thelma Williams, Jr., Petitioner v. Barbara Smallwood, et al.

562 U.S. 1129, 131 S. Ct. 914,

178 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 499.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.81 MB)
 
 DSCC DLA Land and Maritime Product Test Lab visits L&M news L&M
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 10.25**INCREASING LENDER AGREEMENT**Dated January 31, 2006     Reference is made to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 27,2005 (as the same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “***CreditAgreement***”), among Duquesne Light Company (the “***Borrower***”), the Lenders named therein, JPMorganChase Bank, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, NA), as Administrative Agent and an LC Issuer, MellonBank, N.A., as an LC Issuer, the other LC Issuers from time to time parties thereto, Union Bank ofCalifornia, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association and Citibank, N.A.,as Co-Documentation Agents. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shallhave the meanings assigned thereto in the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to Section 2.1(v) of theCredit Agreement, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “***Increasing Lender***”) has agreed to increase itsCommitment from $10,666,667.00 to $15,666,667.00.     The Increasing Lender and the Administrative Agent agree as follows:     1. The Increasing Lender agrees, on the terms and conditions set forth in the CreditAgreement, to make Loans to the Borrower and to participate in the issuance of Facility LCs (andthe LC Obligations thereunder) during the period from the date hereof until the Revolving CreditTermination Date (subject to Section 2.1(ii) of the Credit Agreement), in an aggregate outstandingamount not to exceed on any day the Increasing Lender’s Commitment set forth opposite its signaturebelow.     2. On the date hereof (the “***Effective Date***”), the Increasing Lender shall pay to theAdministrative Agent, in same day funds, at such address and account as the Administrative Agentshall advise the Increasing Lender, $0.00, which amount shall be used to purchase by assignmentfrom the existing Lenders such portion of the Loans owing to them such that, after giving effect toall such purchases and assignments, the Increasing Lender will share such Loans ratably with eachof them (based upon the Increasing Lender’s Pro Rata Share). As of the Effective Date, upon thepayment of such amount, the Commitment of the Increasing Lender shall be the amount set forthopposite its signature below.     3. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties inseparate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all ofwhich taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.     4. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of theState of New York.
1

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by theirrespective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.***Commitment***       $15,666,667.00 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.         By: /s/ Michael J DeForge       Name: Michael J DeForge      Title: Vice President           JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.  as Administrative Agent         By: /s/ Michael J DeForge       Name: Michael J DeForge      Title: Vice President  AGREED and ACCEPTED
### AECC Bailey and McClellan- SO2 and PM BART Dayana Medina to: pettyjohn 12/13/2012 04:15 PM Cc: Guy Donaldson, Michael Feldman
From: Dayana Medina/R6/USEPA/US To: pettyjohn@adeq.state.ar.us Cc: Guy Donaldson/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Feldman/R6/USEPA/US@EPA
Hi Mary, As we discussed over the phone earlier this week, here is Region 6's feedback on the draft revised SO2 and PM BART analysis for the AECC Bailey and McClellan plants. For your reference, I also attached a copy of the APCEC Minute Order that granted BART sources in Arkansas a variance from the BART compliance deadline imposed by APCEC Reg. 19, Chapter 15. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you!

Best Regards, Dayana Medina U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Air Planning Section (6PD-L) 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75202 214-665-7241 medina.dayana@epa.gov
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Junlian Integrated
Surveillance, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:
  1.The Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  2.The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
    May
      20, 2008
            /s/ Zhang Jun
      Chuan
              Zhang
      Jun Chuan, Chief Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17158]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board Task Force on National Imagery and Mapping 
Agency (NIMA)

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on National Imagery and 
Mapping Agency (NIMA) will meet in closed session on June 23-24, 1998 
at the National Reconnaissance Organization, 14675 Lee Road, Chantilly, 
Virginia. In order for the Task Force to obtain time sensitive 
classified briefings, critical to the understanding of the issues, this 
meeting is scheduled on short notice.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will review the objectives and plans of the National Imagery and 
Mapping Agency (NIMA) to meet the needs of the national and military 
intelligence customers as they enter the 21st Century.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been 
determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters listed in 
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting will be 
closed to the public.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-17158 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report ), I,
James Park, Chief Executive Officer and I, Bong S. Park Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James Park James Park Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer Date: August 19, 2010

/s/ Bong S. Park Bong S. Park Chief Financial Officer

  Date: August 19, 2010

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36469-36470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3090]


State of Oregon

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on June 
12, 1998, I find that Crook County, Oregon constitutes a disaster area 
due to damages caused by flooding that occurred May 28 through June 3, 
1998. Applications for loans for physical damages as a result of this 
disaster may be filed until the close of business on August 11, 1998, 
and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on March 
12, 1999 at the address listed below or other locally announced 
locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, 
PO Box 13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Deschutes, Grant, 
Harney, Jefferson, and Wheeler in the State of Oregon may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location.
    The interest rates are:

Physical Damage

    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 7.000%.
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.500%.
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000%.
    Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 4.000%.

[[Page 36470]]

    Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 7.125%.

For Economic Injury

    Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit 
Available Elsewhere: 4.000%.
    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 309006 
and for economic injury the number is 988800.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-17708 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
2016-1757.

#### Lavelle v. Henderson.

Summit App. No. 27921, 2016-Ohio-5313.

Fischer, J., dissents.
No. 10-7024.

#### Lawrence Maher, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 618,

178 L. Ed. 2d 449,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8981.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 09-9986.

#### Ganiyu Jaiyeola, Petitioner v. Carrier Corporation.

562 U.S. 1086, 131 S. Ct. 688,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9416.

178 L. Ed. 2d 518,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 843, 131 S. Ct. 78, 178 L. Ed. 2d 50, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5785.
# C_2014039EN.01002201.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/22

---

Action brought on 11 November 2013 — Cosmowell v OHIM — Haw Par (GELENKGOLD)

(Case T-599/13)

2014/C 39/38

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cosmowell GmbH (Sankt Johann in Tirol) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haw Par Corp. Ltd (Singapore, Singapore)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 September 2013 in Case R 2013/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 September 2013 in Case R 2013/2012-4;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark which includes the picture of a tiger and the word element ‘GELENKGOLD’, for goods in Classes 5, 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 9957978

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Haw Par Corp. Ltd

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative marks which include the picture of a tiger, for goods in Class 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 4.1

                                 Kevin McKnight
                             33 S.E. 7th St. Suite C
                              Boca Raton, FL 33432
                                 (516) 561-6620


December 6, 2004

Dtomi, Inc.
200 9th Avenue North
Suite 200
Safety Harbor, FL 34965

Re: Business developmental services

This letter sets forth the agreement  between  Dtomi,  Inc. and Kevin  McKnight,
concerning consulting services rendered to Dtomi, Inc. from December 6, 2004 and
continuing through March 6, 2005 (3 months).

Dtomi,  Inc. is desirous of having Kevin McKnight provide  business  development
services. In addition, Kevin McKnight will investigate  opportunities with other
companies  who may be potential  partners  for  technological  development  with
Dtomi,   Inc.  Kevin  McKnight  will  use  his  best  efforts  to  maintain  the
confidential nature of the proprietary or confidential information.

As compensation  for its services  Dtomi,  Inc. shall issue Kevin McKnight three
hundred  thousand  free trading  common  shares of Dtomi,  Inc.,  of which three
hundred thousand shares are due upon counter-signature of the agreement.

Dtomi,  Inc.  acknowledges  that  Kevin  McKnight  is acting  as an  independent
contractor  and not as an employee of Dtomi,  Inc. as such neither party has the
authority to bind the other,  nor make any unauthorized  representations  on the
behalf of the other.

Dtomi,  Inc agrees to  indemnify  Kevin  McKnight  and hold him harmless for any
acts, losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses arising out of any action
or course of action  brought  against  Kevin  McKnight  in  connection  with its
rendering services under this agreement.

I hereby agree to conduct all activities,  and to cause any entity of which I am
a stockholder,  partner, member, director or employee to conduct it's activities
on behalf of Dtomi, Inc. in full compliance with all applicable laws.

This  agreement  shall be  construed  according  to the laws of the State of New
York.


---------------------------------           ------------------------------
Kevin T. McKnight                           Dtomi, Inc.
No. 10-5731.

#### Louis Laurore, Petitioner v. UMass Medical Healthcare, et al.

562 U.S. 966, 131 S. Ct. 464,

178 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7949.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 73 Mass. App. 1109, 897 N.E.2d 1042.