REX TECHNICAl SERYICE~ llC 

155 Highland Park Drive • Bloomfield, Conneccicuc 06002 • (860) 242·3863 

COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT 

HARD AND DECORATIVE CImOME PLATING LINES 

WHYCO FINISmNG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 

THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT 

Prepared By: 

Jeremy N. Bidwell 

REX TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC 

August, 2005 

Project No. C-02-19 
( 

1.1 Summary 1 

1.2 Test Program Organization 1 

Z.1 Thin Dense Chrome Line 

Z.2 Precision Plating Line 3 

2.3 Plating Liquor 4 

2.4 Control Devices 4 

3.1 Reporting of Results 8 

4.1 Thin Dense Chrome Exhaust Duct Sampling Location 12 

4.2 Precision Plating Line Exhaust Duct Sampling Location 12 

5.1 Hexavalent Chromium Measurement 16 

S.2 Oxygen Determination 18 

5.3 Sample Gas Velocity Measurements 18 

5.4 Exhaust Gas Moisture 18 

6.1 Quality Assurance 19 

6.2 Sample Identification and Custody 19 

6.3 Blank Collection 20 

REX TECH 
1 

] 

1 

] 

] 

] 

] 

) 

J 

J 

J 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Summary 

Rex Technical Services, LLC (Rex Tech) was retained by Wbyco Finishing Technologies, 

LLC (\Vhyco) of Thomaston, Connecticut to conduct compliance emission testing on two chrome 

plating lines and the associated emission control devices. The testing for these sources was 

required as a condition of the Permit to Operate, which was issued by the State of Connecticut 

Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP), Bureau of Air Management. Hexavalent 

Chromium emissions were measured and compared to the CTDEP regulatory limits for these 

sources, which are the Maximum Allowable Stack Concentrations (MASC) limits, in units of 

micrograms ofCr+6 per cubic meter of exhaust gas at actual stack conditions (uglACM). All three 

tests at eaCh of the two sources yielded emission rates of hexavalent chromium, which were below 

the CTDEP MASC limits. 

1.2 Test Program Organization 

The following are names and phone numbers of individuals primarily responsible for the 

organization of this test program: 

State of Connecticut 

Department of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Air Management 

Carl Ekroth, Field Test Coordinator 

(860) 424-3894 

Dennis Demchek 

(860) 214-2155 

Rex Technical Services, LLC 

Jeremy Bidwell, 

Project Manager 

(860) 242-3863 

Whyco FiI1iJbing T.clulologies. LLC R.pon 

Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC 

Barbara Lewis, 

E,H & S Manager 

(860) 283-5826 

Environmental Health laboratories, 

Inc. 

Jim Kenny 

Client Services Representative 

(860) 635-6475 

Augus12005 

REX TECH 
( 

( 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTIOi'( 

The \Vbyco Tcclmologies fac ility in Thomaston, Connecticut is ajob shop which employs 

decorative and hard chrome plating stations in (he manufacture of bearing housings, fuel injectors 

and other parts for various manufacturing industries. The chrome plating stations, which are 

located within multiple chrome plating tanks, emit waler vapor and sulfuric acid fumes which are 

collected at the edges of the tanks via fume sweeps. These gas streams pass through mist 

eliminators and are exhausted to atmosphere approximately 30 feCI above grade through rooftop 

induced draft fans and exhaust stacks. 

Two production lines were separately tested for emissions of hexavalent chromium. These two 

lines are the Thin Dense Chrome line which is a decorative chrome plating process, and the 

Precision Plating Line which is a hard chrome plating process. Each line is described below. 

2.1 Thin Dense Chrome Line 

e--Thin Qense OlI'ome (IDC) process is desigru!teo as a decorati e chrome at n{~rqless. This 

process was compliance tested for Cr+6 emissions in March of 200 1. At that time, lines A, B, C 

and 0 were vented through one stack, while lines E, F and G were vented through a second stack. 

Both stacks were tested separately. Since lhat compliance test, the conJiguration of the flrst stack is 

unchanged; however two additional lines have been added to those vented by the second stack. The 

two new lines are H and "fixtures", The second stack has now been retested with its current 

process configuration of lines E, F, G, H and Fixtures. 

The E, F, G and H lines of the TOC process are all used to chrome plate automotive fuel injectors. 

The Fixtures line is used to plate the support substrates used in other baths as supports for the fuel 

injectors during plating. The following table summarizes the operating parameters of each line in 

the TOC process: 

'Nhy~Q Fuu.b"'8 T. tMolo gi ••• LLC Report 

2 
( Table 2-1 

Thin Dense Chrome Process Parameters 

For lines feeding Stack #2 

Line Designation E F G H Fixtures . Rectifier capacity (Amps) 500 500 250 300 600 

Max typical current applied (Amps) 80 80 80 210 120 

Avg typical current applied (Amps) 80 80 80 210 120 

"Dummy" parts or live jobs used 

Dwnmy Dummy Dummy Live Live 

during Testing? 

Amps applied during testing 350 475 225 270 100 

# of plating bays in line 5 5 5 2 1 

Total volume of plating baths (gal) 100 100 100 75 34 

Electrical DC current is supplied to each line by a dedicated Dynatronics Company rectifier at the 

ratings shown above. The total capacity of these rectifiers is 2150 Amps. Turnaround time is 

approximately 30 minutes between runs, with two 8-hour shifts active per day. Periodically, steel 

"dummy" cylinders are loaded into the bath and a current is applied. The dummy cylinders receive 

no chrome plating but rather serve to remove iron from the solution. 

Gaseous emissions from the chrome plating tanks are collected by perimeter fume sweeps, routed 

through a mist eliminator and vented to atmosphere via a roof mounted stack. Figure 2-1 shows a 

conceptual layout of the plating line, its control devices and the exhaust stack. 

2.2 Precision Plating Line 

The Precision Plating Line (PPL) process is designated as a hard chrome plating process. It is 

comprised of one 800 gallon capacity tank with a surface area of 40 square feet. The tank. has 16 

plating bays, 8 per side, where bearing housings of various sizes are chrome plated. Electrical 

Why.:o Fini'NnS Technologies. LLC ReJlon 

3 
( current is applied at a typical rate of 2.5 Amps per square inch of plated surface. Electrical DC 

current is supplied to the two sides of the tank by a pair of Dynatronics Company rectifiers, each 

with a 4000 Amp rating. The rated capacity of the process, based on shunt bar capacities, is 3,200 

Amps. The total capacity of these rectifiers is 8000 Amps. Testing was conduct with a total 

rectifier output of 6,600 to 6,400 Amps, using "dummy" parts. Turnaround time is approximately 

30 minutes between runs, with two 8-hour shifts active per day. Periodically, steel "dummy" 

cylinders are loaded into the bath and a current is applied. The dummy cylinders receive no chrome 

plating but rather serve to remove iron from the solution. 

Gaseous emissions from the chrome plating tank are collected by perimeter fume sweeps, routed 

through a mist eliminator and vented to atmosphere via a roof mounted stack. Figure 2-2 shows a 

conceptual layout of the plating line, it's control devices and the exhaust stack. 

2.3 Plating Liquor 

The plating liquor used in both the IDC and PPL tanks is an aqueous sulfuric acid (H2S04) 

solution. Heef2S Chrome Plating Solution is added to the PPL bath, to maintain a chromic acid 

content of250 gIliter. Chromic acid is added to the TDC bath, to maintain a chromic acid content 

of 800 glliter. The plating liquors are monitored once daily by colorimetric chromium content 

analyses at Whyco's in-house lab. Barium Carbonate is then added to adjust the sulfate to 0.36 

ozlgal. Chromium content is monitored using a floating density indicator which is placed directly 

into the bath. Sulfuric acid content is monitored by periodic analysis of an aliquot of bath liquid, 

using a Kocur Co. sulfate test kit. The solution surface tension is measured once per shift using a 

stalagmometer. The surface tension is maintained above 4S dynes per cm

2 by addition of Dupont 

Zonyl FS-62 mist suppressant. 

2.4 Control Devices 

Chromium emissions from the two sources being tested are controlled by two separate ViroWhyt:o FiDisbiDg Teclulolosies. LLC Report 

4 
r 

( Chrome 9000 composite mesh pad three section mist eliminators manufactured by the Viron 

I Company. Each Viron scrubber utilizes three (3) in-line mesh pads, which are equipped with a 

bank of spray heads for periodic washdown. The scrubbers are equipped with Magnehelic pressure 

I 

I 

I 

gauges across the mesh pads to measure the pressure drop of each pad during operation. The 

exhaust systems are each driven by a ten HP roof mounted induced draft (ID) fan with a maximum 

exhaust rate of 5,000 cfm. Technical specifications on the Viron scrubbers are provided in the 

appendix of this document. 

Whyco I'inubing Technologies. UC Report 

5 
( 

( 

I. 

roof 

I J I 

~ 

G) 

§ 

Figure 2-1 

Thin Dense Chrome Process Conceptual Layout 

Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC 

Thomaston, Ct. 

August, 2005 

Viron 

Scrubber 

I r I 

.--

::z: 

aI 

:9 1.1. LU L0-

G) aI r- .5 .5 .J ..../ '" Q) 

3 

~ '-

Wbyco Firush'ng Technologies. LlC Repon 

6 

stack 

J i\ 

Augus12005 

IlEXTECH 
( 

roof 

I 

Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC Report 

Figure 2-2 

Precision Plating Line Process Conceptual Layout 

Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC 

Thomaston, Ct. 

August, 2005 

stack 

) f\ 

Viron 

Scrubber 

II I I I I I 

Tank PPL - 01A 

7 

Augw12005 

IlEXTECH 
I 

I' 

( 

Table 3-1 

Hexavalent Chromium Emission Measurement~ 

redsion )1ating me - ~ cd 

Whyco Finishing Technologies 

Thomaston, Connecticut 

JULY 12, 2005 

Test # 1 Test # 2 

Process Cond itions 

Plating Amperage 6,600 6,600 

Stack Tempera ture (Deg.F) 101.1 102.8 

Flow,"atc (ACFl.\'l) 3532 369 1 

Flowra tc (DSCFiVl) 3257 3394 

F lowr:ltc (AC"I/scc) 1.6667 1.7419 

Cr Emissions 

Co ncentrati on (mgIDSCM) 0.00155 0.00143 

Act. Stack Conc. or ASC (ug/ACiVI) 1.4688 1.4320 

iVlASC l imit (ug/ACl\1) 11.0715 10.6355 

Emission Rate (TPy) 0.000081 0.000078 

Cr Emission Ra tes in other units 

Mg/h r 8.3403 8.0310 

Lb/hr 0.000018 0.000018 

'Nhy<o F,m.runH T,eMologi " . LLC R'P0;1 

9 

Test # 3 Average 

6,600 6,600 

101.7 101.9 

3654 3625 

3370 3340 

1. 7245 1.7110 

0.00172 0.00156 

1.6805 1.5271 

10.7331 10.8133 

0.000093 0.000084 

9.5874 8.6529 

0.000021 0.000019 

Augu.t 200' 

REX TECH 
( 

r 

3.0 RESULTS OF TESTING 

The purpose of the test program was to evaluate the hexavalent cluomiwn (Cc"6

) emission rate of 

the chrome plating lines during thier hi ghest level of ac ti vity, by: 

• Collecting triplicate isokinetic gaseous samples from the exhaust duct sampling locations 

in accordance with EPA Method 306, to determine the in-stack Cr gaseous concentrations 

in units of milligrams per cubic meter (mglfvIJ) and parts per million (ppm). 

• Measuring volumetric "f1owrate and moisture content at the exhaust duct sampling locations 

in accordance with EPA Method 1-4, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Flows and moisture 

determinations were performed to calculate the total chromium emission rates in units of 

pounds per hour (lb/hr) and tons per year (TPY). 

Tripl icate 2 hour tests were perfomlcd. During the data collection period of each test, plating line 

operational parameters were monitored. These include amperage, Baume gravity and control 

device pressure drops. 

3.1 Reporting of Results 

The hard chrome plating line at the Whyco Finishing Technologies facility in Thomaston, Ct. 

passed the ChrOnllWll emissions compliance test, in that the exhaust stack chromium concentration 

were demonstrated to be below the applicable regulatory linlits for both of the sources tested. The 

three te sts of each source showed good agreement between tests for all measured parameters, with 

no sampling or process upsets. Quality Assurance steps taken (isokinetic calculations, analysis of 

blank samples, meter box post calibration, etc.) were all well within allowed tolerances. Table 3-1 

and 3-2, below show the results of the tests. Raw data and reduced data summaries can be found in 

the appendix section of this report. 

Augu!! 200' 

KEXTECH 

8 
( 

Table 3-2 

Hexavalent Chromium Emission Measurements 

_ense Clirome Plalin Cine 

Whyco Finishing Technologies -!) J 

Thomaston, Connecticut e Co r-... T, 've 

JULY 13,2005 

Process Condi tions 

Pl a ti ng Amperage 

Stac k Te lllIJerature (dcg. F) 

Flowratc (ACFM) 

Flowrate (DSCFM) 

Flowra tc (ACl\'l/scc) 

Cr Emissions 

Concentra tion (mg/DSCM) 

Act. Stack Conc. or ASC (uglACiVO 

i\1A.SC limit (ug/ACM) 

Emissio n Rate (T l)y) 

Cr Emission Ra tes in othe r IIlIits 

Mg/hr 

ACFM ::::: actual cubic fee t per minute 

DSCFM == dry standard cubic feet per minute 

Lb/hr 

Test 1# 1 

1,420 

73.8 

245 1 

2372 

1.1565 

0.00032 

0.3508 

73.529 1 

0.000012 

1.2420 

0.00000274 

Test # 2 Test # 3 

1,420 1,420 

73.7 73.6 

2646 431 5 

2578 4217 

1.2489 2.0366 

0.00024 0.00019 

0.2768 0.2809 

68.2325 42.5002 

0.000010 0.000013 

1.0097 1.)645 

0.00000223 0.00000301 

AClvUsec = actual cubic meters per second (actual conditions are wet, at slack temperature 

and stack static pressure) 

mgIDSCM = milligrams per dry standard cubic meIer 

uglACM = micrograms per actual cubic meter 

TPY = tons pe r year 

Avcraoe 

1,420 

73.7 

3137 

3056 

1.4806 

0.00025 

0.3028 

61.4206 

0.000012 

1.2054 

0.00000266 

The 8 hour hazard limiting value fo r Hexavalent chromium as Cr is 0.25 ug/tve , from table 29-1 of the 

CTDEP re gulations, Section 22a-1 i4-29. 

The exhaust point is less than 10 meters above grade. 

'Nhyco Fin"jung Teohr.o o~ie •. U.C Repan "'"B"'ll00' 

REX TECH 

10 
( 

The following calculations were used for pollutant concentrations and emission rates: 

mglACM = ( mg catch )/(yol MJ)(f,fT,.,)(PmlP.)(lOO/(lOO-% H,Olll 

Where: 

ppm = [( mg ca tch )(lIm.w.)(24.0046/1000)( I ( voll)(52SfT m)«p,.,+P,)/29.92)M( 

Iblbr = (ppm)(m.w.)(DSCFM)(15.58 x IO ) 

mg catch = total Cr+

6 in sample 

Ts= Stack Temperarure, oR 

T m= Meter temperature oR 

Pm= Meter pressure, in Hg 

Pb = Barometric Pressure, in I-Ig 

vol = sample volume in liters or cubic meters 

Ps= Stack Pressure, in Hg 

%H20= Moisture Content of Exhaust Gas 

M. W.= Cr+6 molecular weight = 51.996 glmol 

y = dry gas meter calibration fac tor 

I I 

AU .... 12cm 

I?EXTECH 
I 

Ie 

( 

t 

( 

( 

r 

I 

I ( 

I 

f 

I 

4.0 DESCRIPTION OF SAl\1PLING LOCATION 

4.1 Thin Dense Chrome Exhaust Duct Sampling Location 

Five (5) sampling ports were located along the same plane, equally spaced apart in a straight section 

of 23" wide by 17. 5" deep rectangular PVC ductwork. The ports were 3 inch holes sealed with duct 

tape. The ports were located 40 inches (2.0 duct diameters) downstream from a set of fan outlet 

straightening vanes and 21.5 inches (1.08 duct diameters) upstream from a stack tip transition. All 

measurements were taken at these five ports. Based on the above parameters, EPA Method 1 

required 25 sampling points (5 per port). Isokinetic Method 306 samples and the associated 

flowrate measurements were taken on the five traverses at the points shown in Table 4-1. Figure 4-

1 shows the outlet stack sampling location. 

(2 Precision Plating Line Exhaust Duct Sampling Location 

Two (2) sampling ports were located 900 apart in a straight section of23" diameter round PVC 

ductwork. The ports were 3 inch holes sealed with duct tape. The ports were located 41.4 inches 

(2.3 duct diameters) downstream from a square to round transition and 14.4 inches (0.8 duct 

diameters) upstream from the tip of the stack. All measurements were taken at these two ports. 

Based on the above parameters, EPA Method 1 required 24 sampling points (12 per port). 

Isokinetic Method 306 samples and the associated tlowrate measurements were taken on the two 

traverses at the points shown in Table 4-2. Figure 4-2 shows the outlet stack sampling location. 

Wbyco Fwshing Technologies. LLC Report AugusI200' 

REX TECH 

12 
Point # 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Point # 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

Table 4-1 

Location of Traverse Points 

Thin Dense Chrome Sampling Location 

Calculated Depth Depth With Port 

2.3 2.3 

6.9 6.9 

11.5 11.5 

16.1 16.1 

20.9 20.9 

Table 4-2 

Location of Traverse Points 

Precision Plating Line Sampling Location 

Calculated Depth Depth With Port 

0.483 0.483 

1.541 1.541 

2.714 2.714 

4.071 4.071 

5.75 5.75 

8.188 8.188 

14.812 14.812 

17.25 17.25 

18.929 18.929 

20.286 20.286 

21.459 21.459 

22.517 22.517 

* denotes sampling points which have been moved in from the stack walls, as per EPA Method 1 

Port depth = 0 inches for both locations 

Wbyco Firushing Technologies. LLC Repon AU8lU12CO' 

R£XTECH 

13 
( 

~ 

[ 

I 

I 5 s.",~1lrIg pe," conree! -Mill b1~ 

I ( 

I 

] 

j 

j 

j 

J 

• 

j 

Wl\yco firultwlg T«MO!Og1el, LLC Rcpotl 

Figure 4~ I 

Exhaust Stack Sampling Locations 

Thin Dense Chrome Process 

\Vhyco Finishing Technologies, LLC 

Thomaston, Ct. 

July, 2005 

"A" Oim~MIon. 21.5" (l.1ll Equ",.t.nl Ol.m.to.) 

"9" Dlmrnllon 

(l.O fqutv.!.n, 01 ...... 1.' 

AUJlI>l200S 

REX TECH 

14 
, 

, 

I 

'( 

1 

1 

Figure 4-2 

Ex.haust Stack Sampling Locations 

Precision Plating Line 

Whyco Finishing Technologies, LLC 

Thomaston, Ct. 

July, 2005 

15 

"A" Olmtn:llon. ,..,-

(0,8 duol dll.ml:etsl 

"S" Dlm.nllon· 'I.'" 

(2.3 duocl dl&mel."1 

Augu.12005 

KEXTECH 
( 5.0 SAlVlPLING AND ANALYSIS l\11ETHODOLOGY 

The purpose of the test program was to demonstrate compliance of the plating lines with the 

CTDEP Cr+6 MASC limit for this source in ugiACM. Total chromium emissions were measured 

and compared to these Cr+6 Iimits. 

5.1 Hexavalent Chromium Measurement 

Sampling Train 

The sample gas hexavalent chromium (Cr+6

) content was measured in accordance with EPA 

Method 306, as described in 40 CFR, Part 63, Appendix A. Triplicate tests were conducted, with 

each test consisting of a 2 hour sample. A minimum of 60 cubic feet of sample gas was collected. 

This train consisted of a glass nozzle, unheated Teflon probe and flexible sample line, two 

impingers containing 100 milliliters (ml) each of 0.1 N NaOH, a third empty impinger and a fourth 

impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel. A vacuum pump, dry gas meter, orifice flowmeter, 

pitot tube, thermocouple and inclined manometers completed the sampling train. 

As per the method, a glass fiber filter was not used, nor was the probe heated. The method also did 

not require the use of a probe brush, and none was used. An emission sample was withdrawn from 

the sampling location at an isokinetic rate through a glass nozzle. The method was modified to use 

a Teflon lined probe and a flexible Teflon sample line to connect the probe and impingers. The 

probe was equipped with a pitot tube and a thermocouple, as well as the glass nozzle and Teflon 

probe liner. A block diagram of the sampling train is presented in Appendix A. 

A programmable calculator was used as an electronic nomograph to detennine isokinetic sampling 

rates, which allows for quick updating of assumed values (such as stack and meter temperatures) 

during a test. 

Wbyco Fwsh:ng Technologies. LLC ~port AUBWI200S 

REX TECH 

16 
1 

, 

I C- Pretest preparations 

I 

I 

J 

I 

\ 

I 

Prior to the field sampling effort, all glassware, nozzles, probe liner and flexible line were cleaned 

with alconox cleanser, tap water rinsed three times, reagent water rinsed three times and soaked for 

a minimum of 4 hours in a 10 % v/v nitric acid (HN03) solution. After soaking, the train 

components were rinsed three times with reagent water, air dried and sealed with parafilm. 

At the site, the impingers were charged and weighed on a triple beam balance to the nearest 0.5 g. 

The train was assembled and leak checked at 15 inches of mercwy (in. Hg). 

Sample Recovery 

After sampling and a post test leak check, the impingers were re-weighed and the train recovered 

with all sample media except silica gel combined into one precleaned 1000 m1 wide mouth HOPE 

container. This included impinger contents and rinses of all glassware and the probe/flexible line 

assembly. Sample containers were marked at the height of the fluid level, to indicate the possible 

occurrence of sample leakage during transport. All rinses were with 0.1 N NaOH. All reagents 

used for this test program were from the same lot number. Samples were stored in Rex Tech's 

refrigerator and delivered, on blue ice the next day, to the analytical laboratory. The silica gel was 

inspected and, if viable as determined by color change, was reused for the next test. 

Laboratory Analysis 

Samples were analyzed by the laboratory, following the Method 306 guidelines, for hexavalent 

chromium by ion chromatography with post-column reaction (ICIPCR) with preconcentration. The 

standard operating procedure (SOP) for this method, as employed by the laboratory, was reviewed 

and approved by USEP A Region 1 and serves as a QA guideline for analysis. The analytical 

detection limit for ICIPCR is 1.6ugIM3, based on 60 Fe sampled. This LOO is below the 

anticipated MASC limit of 12 ugIM3 for TOC and 52 ug/~ve for PPL. 

Wbyco Finishing TcclInolo8lH, LI.C Report August 200' 

17 REXT.£CH 
5.2 Oxygen Determination 

The stack gas Oxygen (02) and Carbon Dioxide (C02) content were assumed at 20.9 % and 

at 78.9 %, respectively, since the system was essentially exhausting ambient air. 

5.3 Sample Gas Velocity :Measurements 

Sample gas velocities were measured at points chosen in accordance with EPA method 1, 

taking into account duct size, shape and local flow disturbances, as described in section 4 of this 

report. An S type pitot tube and an inclined manometer were used to measure velocity pressure in 

accordance with EPA method 2. Included in the Appendix section is a schematic of the velocity 

sampling train. A thermocouple and potentiometer were used to measure stack gas temperatures. 

The thennocouple was attached to the pitot tube assembly. Pitot tubes and thermocouples were 

calibrated prior to the sampling program in accordance with EPA Method 2. Gas velocity 

measurements were conducted simultaneously with the three compliance tests. 

5.4 Exhaust Gas Moisture 

The stack gas moisture content was measured as part of the Method 306 samples. The gas sample 

was extracted at an isokinetic rate from the exhaust stack (a minimum of 60 cubic feet of stack gas 

was sampled). The sample stream moisture was determined volumetrically and gravimetrically. 

The measured stack gas moisture was used to correct actual sampling conditions to dry standard 

conditions. 

Wbyeo Finisbutg Technologies, LLC Report AUlJIISt 200' 

REX TECH 

18 
( 6.0 QAlQC ACTIVITIES 

6.1 Quality Assurance 

The QA program at Rex Technical Services, LLC is based on the procedures outlined in the Quality 

Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems Volume ill. Stationary Source 

Specific Methods (EPA 600/4-77-027b). 

The checkout and calibration of the source sampling equipment is performed prior to and at the 

completion of each project. Referenced calibration procedures are strictly followed and the results 

properly documented and retained. A calibration package was available at the jobsite prior to 

testing, showing the pretest calibrations of applicable equipment. This data, along with post test 

calibration data, was included in the appendix of the Final Test Report. The following calibrated 

and/or certified equipment was used during the test program: 

Type-S Pitot Tubes 

Sampling Nozzles 

Type-K Thermocouples 

Dry Gas Meters 

Quality control for the various organic and inorganic analytical procedures is established using field 

blanks, method blanks, trip blanks, surrogate spiking, and internal standards for quantification. 

Where applicable, percent recoveries are calculated and determined. 

6.2 Sample Identification and Custody 

Sample custody procedures for this program are based on EPA recommended procedures. The 

project manager is responsible for ensuring that proper custody and documentation procedures are 

followed for the field sampling and field analytical efforts. The project manager is assisted in this 

effort by key sampling personnel involved in sample recovery. All sampling data, including 

information regarding sampling times, locations, and any specific considerations associated with 

Wbyco Finishit.g Tcclmologies. LtC Rcpon 

19 

August 2005 

REX TECH 
C sample acquisitions are recorded in black ink on pre-fonnatted data sheets. Field notebooks are 

maintained to docwnent individual test programs and specific field occurrences. 

Following sample collection, all samples are given a unique alphanumeric sample identification 

code. Sample labels and integrity seals are completed and affixed to the sample container. 

Samples are stored in a secure area until shipment. The sample volumes are detennined and 

recorded and the liquid levels on each bottle are marked. All samples are packed and shipped 

according to Department of Transportation (DOl) guidelines. As the samples are packed for 

shipment to the appropriate laboratories, chain-of-custody fonns are completed for each shipment 

box and enclosed therein. 

6.3 Blank CoUection 

The following blank samples was collected and sent to the analytical laboratory along with the live 

samples. The blanks was analyzed along with the samples. 

• Field Blank - an aliquot ofNaOH collected in the field during the sampling effort, designated on the 

chain of custody fonn as Reagent Blank, 

• Final Train Blank - an aliquot ofNaOH used to rinse down the sampling train after testing was 

complete, designated on the chain of custody form as Test 7. 

Wbyco FiJlululIS Technologies, !.!.C Repon August 200' 

REX TECH 

20 
APPENDIX A 

Field Data Sheets, Reduced Data Sheets and Sampling Train Schematics 

l( 

I ... 

REX TECH 
Ht::X-TEC H NI CAL"SE RVICES. LTI:; MA~ual rvretFiods L>afa Sheet .' ~. 

Da\ I Z. ..t 

Test No.JI'T' ~ '" Stack Static Press . ...,()~ • .;;:;u,;:;;.... __ -

Sampling LocatiOr('-L''p~PIL~~ __ 

Cllent"o.1~ 0 

Module No. -tt:-',.. «)t)''JJ Initial Pitot Leak Check ~,(X)l) DGM Y value t.O.O ., Final Pilot Leak Check ~Q'bO DGM AH@value to l,..8' Initial Train Leak Check (Q"i ft3@ Wn.Hg 

Barometric Press. ~·~u..O~O~7 __ _ Stack Absolute Press. _"' __ '___ _ 

Project No. 1: _07.-- l't 

Job Location 'T"tD~~~,~. '-'t 

Testers ,tJ R. /-0[" 

Probe 10 l..I A)___ fyo\"'. Final Train Leak Check 0 .o.~ ft3@ in.Hg 

Pilot Cp ("') . "is''f Initial. Sampling Time 045.. , Nozzle 1.0. G I c;..1~ ti. '-4 Fi~:,1 Sampling Time _1 .... I::....u..:::b"--__ 

raverse Sample 

'ort/Point Time 

I (min) 

o 

iD 

L £j'. 

lD 

25' 

J5 

i'fo 

SD . 

1.55. 

7.1 

LOO 

(OoS 

uO 

,'to 

" 7 ( "1 Clock Pi tot Orifice DGM Temp DGM Temp Stack Sample Gas Impinger Heater Probe Filler 

Time Pressure Pressure IN OUT Temp Volume S.G. temp Box Temp Temp OuUet 

i{hrs:mln} (AP, in H20 (MI, in H2O Tm, dea F) l(Tm, deg F) l(Ts, deg F) (Vm, ft3) !(dea Fl I(dea F) I(deg F) I(deg F) 

1/():Oo ;l ~ T L/ 'fl) 1 Kob IOf 8'lfS. as" ,s7; 

10: 'J> 7 ,:3' 1,5 'f. ,.~ (00 'll){. 3 0 S' "" 

l/ll.S"Z ,1..1 7. (ij '17 10 1/0/ F//6. '10 .fCf 

1C1:s7 ,28' 2.' ,'y. 90 00 'fiZI. If) s1 

/I,:C(.J '.1; Ii, I 11 ~ i~1 1//)'( If&·, fo '17 

IZ',/O .3> 1:\,,, '19 7 z. {~'fS (t'. 1.(,) 

Averaged IO.S":}'lO Z,193i t.tS-,f{ ~S IO(.f~ '600 1f1C1f .-finalvol 

values I{AvQ.vD.P) I{AvQ.Mf) (Avg. Tm)qoz..,..I{AvQ. Ts) .-inll vol 

Pump 

Vac. 

Ian. Ha} 

-.ro 

-1I.5 

-S.o 

-.1.0 

-,s.O 

-'/,3 

-tf, lJ 

-q,S 

-5.0 

Stack Diameter _---- Stack Area ___ --

Ambient Temp ____ _ 

Comments 

I "l. ~. 'l.. ~t:P.-sampled vol Nomograph Assumed Data 

Filler 1.0. ______ _ 

Sample 1.0. ______ _ 

Review by On-Site Regulatory Rep ________ _ 

Signature Dale 

Avg.Ts __ _ 

Avg. Ps _---._ 

Avg. Pb __ .,-

Avg.·.lm·' __ _ 

%H20_-._ 

Avg.VllP. __ _ DGMY __ _ 

.DGMAH@ __ _ 
RtX I t:Cfn~Il,;ALSE:HVJt,t:-S, LlCDc. '+ /f1./t!1<;-

TesINo.· I-L Module No. ~.L ~0C'l13 

samprm.l~:~ &f~ 

Job Pro;,dNo. location 'r~ _~~_.{jTesters f.J l =-. 

OGM Y value ---il!,-=-, (S()...,......y1-w-__ 

OGM t.H@valuel 'c.G1.'L /),.,1 

Probe 10 _~~,.-,..,.....::::;-....;...r ... -...-.,,"",, 

Pitot Cp 0 . 'iN .. 7 t 

Noz;e I 0 r; t;s~ #4 

!i 

Initial Pitot leak Check --iQar----

Final Pitot leak Check D 

Initial Train leak Check -..'!).-.O....:.()~'l.-~ft3-@-., ... ~;;-n.Hg 

Final Train leak Check 0.00'2... ft3@1:.-,n.Hg 

Initial Sampling TIme (2.. I.~ 

Final Sampling Time (~ '''0 

Slack Slatic Press. _-~Q:..!:::,l~'~ __ Barometric Press. _,,-.;;;.O~. O;;;...f"~ __ Slack Absolute Press. ____ _ 

Slack Diameter ____ _ 

Slack Area _-:'-_--'--_ 

Ambient Temp . ____ _ < 

raverse Sample Clock Pitot Orifice OGMTemp OGMTemp Slack Sample Gas Implnger Heater Probe Filter Pump 

'ort/Point TIme Time Pressure Pressure IN OUT Temp Volume S.G. temp Box Temp Temp OUUat Vac. Comments • 

I(min) '(hrs:min>- (dP, In H20 (MI. In H2O Tm,degF) Tm.deg F) ITs. deg F) Vm.f131 [deg F) (deg F) I(deg F) (deg F) (In. Hg) 

I 0 J2.:~ O.'-{<:- Y.4~ q, LtD 102' OOO.'lS7- i--l - - - S.-:r 

t. c:; t.1'. ,11 O.~l.. 4 \'+ Cl c:;- 'l( (O~ ':/-,OL $'( S,S- ~ 

:J to 1/:1;0.1 C!) .LlLt 4.>8 't.l, q, 10 -:! 1'l.J-(D Li~ J.c, 

'I t<" t ":to DI/-S lf 'I I &f(' 1z.. (o...) t(,tJo 'It .r;, t. 

.> 20 1)'15 D 'L't 'f,JO 111 '1.3 (1J;j -z.5.11 'is S'.s 

, 7t; 11'1: 2.1) Io''i.l '/,0 '''L to ( '13 to::!. )1 L" LIS t,S 

7 ~l) 13'2,$ ~. 2.j l.ff'.s 101 1'1 103 37.0.:5 lf4 ss 

t{ .15 0: 30 ().2' ~,t.s /01 CfS 103 If? 0.$ '1'1 If, 'I 

it 'fO IJ:35 0.2' l,re /0'2. l't oS' Ib:I. 1.(7..0 ~ '(7 l.t':I 

10 '(5 /J:cf/J 0.2. , 'l. S'b tal.. 1'16 1Pl.. ~t2 OL '1'1 $3 

II so O:cf ,S O.J 3 l.l( II) 2.. '6 loct. ~/, .. 9'1' 1(3 .c • .5 

,2- sS' IJ~ ~" 03'-1 1.'/ 0 16.3 '17 1/0'1 ~l,ll- iLl S.5 

( ~O lJ-,S5 O~n l. fjJ llJL fV': (0 ::.\ ~7 ()O .~ . e 0..5 I~:OO I~,z.~ 'l. trz. to) fY lo~ ill.L y~ 'it if. 0 

3 70 IL/;o> 6. Z't 2.. r]" to:) '1'1' 162- 7lZ7 l{'( '1.0 

t( 75 l L·(:tO 16. ~O 2. "II loL q~ , Os ~l., Lf l.. 113 4,1.-

5 g-O II{: 1$ 1<'.303 '>.z.. it) L ,'if If)~ IctfT-, ~o 't1, 4.Sb &".$ l1;z.o 0.J7 "3,.60 ,01 1y IOC( 'Il, ~() 'l~ f, 

7 </() I/Q'ZS lo.~ I 3. ",. to l- 'It 10_1 ,r. 17 ~.s S.() 

ff qS i"( ::\0 16 • .., I 1, cet:? 101.. 17 1/):) 10) If t. 4f,5 ~o : 

1 [6(:) 'i ;35 D. '-I I ;J.'fr It> z.. Cf7 _lIJ'l.. to'._7J 'f£ SoD 

(0 (DS ''l; l(.{) b.'l to. 'I,'" lo'L !'(b l()'l.. II;. {Y '" ~.D ; 

II 110 oJ.s s.'Ja tot '1~ loL ;ll ,,'j £I' 'l,S , 

,"2- 115 O.~~ 3.'l.D '1'1 '17 IOf (z6. /

(;] ~c) ti • .s 

I? () ; 

t 

Averaged 1~$'f.qO :;'.~l ~r,O I.OZ..~ ,;s c...,.J .-finalvol ~ values I (Avg.-It.P) I (Avg.AH·) (A'g~ Tm) (Avg. Ts) .-inlt. vol , 1 ~L t.l:}3 .-sampled vol Nomograph Assumed O;:lta 

Filter 1.0. ______ _ Avg.Ts __ _ %H20 __ _ 

Avg.Ps __ _ Avg."IlP __ _ 

Sample 1.0. ______ _ Avg.Pb __ _ OGMY __ _ 

Avg,Tm __ _ DGM6H@ __ _ 

Review by On-Sile Regulatory Rep __ -:--_____ _ 

Signature Date 
D. 

Test No. _----".........,,--.-L-_ 

Sampling Location --I...,~--­

Client -~~!:""--rPr"­

Project No. -'~-=-.;=--~_ 

Job Location -~~..,r:-:.~~ 

Testers .. ,'" J'\.., --''-'' 

rraverse Sample Clock Pitot 

::'orVPoint Time Time Pressure 

llmin) iChrs:min) (AP.in H2O 

I 0 Ig1l. 0.'11 

'[ <; If) .r..., ( 

3 tD I) 'I q 

!f ("" If) t.(t.( 

~ UJ o ... ; t( 

~ U; IIl.J' 

7 "1,0 lb. 30 

f ~C" (),7Of 

't Lto O.l' 

to 4\" 0.30 

lc ~ 0, '33 

12- c<; O. J 7 

I ~o (), l' 

'7 ts If), Z , 

1. 7() 0.1. ,. 

Cf 7S' D.jV 

s 8"0 o.J'j 

£ g--, O,3L 

7 10 0.) 'f 

( 'IS 0, :l g' 

, 100 1041 

to lc1 r O.YO 

~ !CO Ot ~'3 

12 (I ~ 0.11 

I z. 0 

Module No. 

DGMYvalue 

DGM ~H@value 

Probe 10 

PilotCp 

No~elD . . 

Orifice DGMTemp 

Pressure IN 

(AH.in H2O I/Tm,degF) 

'-(.ot- -Cfl 

118 -Cf~ 

3.'" q~f 

1:(3 '/.S 

4.~ q..5 

"3 171 t;5 

2. '13 elf 

1',1'".3 fC. 

7.71 'If( 

Z,13 q( 

11.2 z.. '1'6 

J,ll.. ((., 

2. YJ. e(7 

1.r3 qg 

1.I'J 'l( 

2. If.:J. 1'6" 

Ll, '31... ~'7 

1.. S'l.. 16 

J.'j/ 'IS 

"1.71 q~ 

1~~ .at4 

1,~ 't:) 

3. 'to'l... 'i.3 

3,/7 q3 

?-

DGMTemp Stack 

OUT Temp. 

I/Tm, deg Fl ICTs, deg Fl 

CJ'L to'l 

q, 107 

-'17 (0 Z. 

tZ ID) 

() 7 I () '7_ 

"' z... ,_" J 

~ 7 I/)7 

If? IOz.. 

tf~ 1()2 

13 C{)l. 

~3 :ltYl .. 

9q 102.. 

'1"1 IDI. 

rs UJt ~.j 162 

1.s /o"l.. 

fJ lO2... 

'1/ 101 

1'1.3 10 I 

1 Z tOI 

q'L Tal 

'll to 1 

'to I!J() 

'10 (0 I 

Initial Pilot Leak Check _~O~ __ _ Final Pilot Leak Check 0 

Initial Train Leak Check ....,0",..... Oc)~L;:---cf:-t3~@ ..... (... ~..-in.Hg 

Final Train Leak Check 0.0.0 1: ft3@ \\ in.Hg 

Initial Sampling Time I S"':"l2. F1n~SamPJlng Time '~'~ L • 

Sample Gas Impinger Heater Probe Filter Pump 

Volume S.G. temp Box Temp Temp Outlet Vac. 

Vm, ft3) :Cdeo F) i(deo F} I(deg F) Ideg F) Inn. Hg) 

1~7 11-' ~( C; .,,~, 90 lAOf Cf 

;'f'f 5' f' I./j , 

1.$0. 0 [; q¥ <I 

/ Sb.1.f S '1:3 ''/ 

16l, 3 Z 'fZ, R.r 

It.<Y.? Y '12 7.0 

17>.' :2 l(2 26 

171': 'Z 7 L{I 60S ,. 8" J t.J.s c.{( t·7 fcj~ 1'1 Coif 7() 

11 J • ') i.f L.(( ")0 

Iff. to 'IS 70 

20.1 77 'if .,0 

17"~6Y l.{t 7.0 

l/3 63 l/"L ).0 

7/'1',Co Z. 't3 7,0 

21.3.(( 'lJ "J.<; 

22'1,01 'Ie.{ trt1:l 

2 3l(.~q 1.('1 ~lO 

i4(')_UO Lts- f2.e . Llf.Cc.lo ttt5'" g.~ 

lSI l1' 41. 7, ) 

1. S7 fit 'l.5 7,5 

---... \ 

Stack Static Press. _6.:;...L.21e~~ __ Barometric Press. --''\=O;...:. •...:::O:....'';;~ __ 

Stack Absolute Press. _-----

Stack Diameter _----- Stack Area _____ _ 

Ambient Temp 

Comments 

Averaged O,~)T '3.y48 'tLf'-L ItJ f ."1- 11 (?oLIn i-final vol 

values I(Avg"'~P) i(Ava.I1H) (Avg. Tnl) iCAv!). Ts) i-init. vol 

Il., 'f~ +-sampled vol Nomograph Assumed Data 

Filler 1.0. ______ _ Avg.Ts __ _ %H20 ___ _ 

Avg.Ps __ _ 

Avg.Pb __ _ 

Avg . .Jt1P __ _ Sample 1.0. ______ _ DGMY __ _ 

Review by On-Site Regulatory Rep ________ _ 

Avg.Tm __ _ DGM~H@ __ _ 

Signature Date 
7/131d1' 

Date ~~I£-__ _ 

T .... t No. -+ __ ~ __ _ Initial Pilot Leak Check ---::():.-__ _ Stack Static Press. _-_U-r' .~1.;..;;,O,..,.- __ 

Sampling Location -rr..-1~"'='-­ Barometric Press. _::J!-$:of) ...:.' O~6~_ 

Client -L!PLftL~---n...-­ Project No 

Module No. __ 1._~ __ DGM Y value ---l.(.,L.:' o~o~q~ __ OGM 6H@value --!Lf.)-',IL.!:_glliL-~ .--nr-:r 

Probe 10 ~~~,~",, __ =-....;f::..;.~= 

Final Pilot Leak Check -al",L...--~,.... 

Initial Train Leak Check 0 001.,.. ft3@-.!£.ln,Hg 

Final Train leak Check tJ 00::1 ft3@ftln Hg 

Initial Sampling Time 0 c:r-: 04 

Stack ~solute Press. ____ _ 

Stack Diameter 

Job Location --..~-r:oLO~_=:..,-:~:TL-tD'\,-6t Stack Area ____ _ 

Testers ~/t>L 

Pilot Cp 0 , ;("4 

No~e 1.0. (y{ 4'~ t:t-y h .,. . I Firyl Sampling Time t I • 09 Ambient Temp ____ _ 

raverse Sample Clock Pitot Orifice DGM Temp DGM Temp Stack' Sample Gas Imp;nger Heater Probe 

Pressure Pressure IN OUT Temp Volume S.G, temp Box Temp Temp 

(boP, in H20 (MI, in H20 Tm, dea F) Tm. dea F) IITs. den F) IIVm..It3) I(dea F) I(dog F) I{deg Fi 

art/Point Time Time 

Imln) (hrs:mln) 

:fJ6 ~.5~ 7'1 Zf 7:J 126'-11.3 '17 

to ';l/ 

5 7.0 

I 1. S 

.l 

s 

so ~.o, O.tO g-o i Y 7 I z17. 6 ; &('1 

3 t..O 

1.0 10./ z It.{,.lS· 8"'l 7"1 17£f 2114,1. 't S I 

f 75 If),o/ D.J' 8'1t 8':'0 17," JtJO,' ( f' 'S 

'2.. 

(5 

5 , 

) 

J. t05 

Ill) 

liS o.t i Ih·t (87 lL 7.3 13'1.1/ "q 

ItO 

Averaged /).1$8' Z.,Ol"l gO. "l." I~~ . 'iCU ~final vol 

~v=alu::.:::e:::.s--lIx..(·,A::.lVa'2:..,.-.J::;;:.6P:..l))~I{A~V:lt.a .• ::;:;MI~n"-1-_-.:j~A'vg1.:..' i!.!!m~)_.l3I<Ac:'v~g: i~s I)~I---.",.-.,...--=--::::~--I+-inll vol 

1.1 ~ '"Li':lo +-sampled vol 

- Filter 1.0. ______ _ 

Sample 1.0. ______ _ 

Review by On-Site Regulatory Rep ________ _ 

Signature Date 

Filter 

Outlet 

[deg F) 

Pump 

Vac. 

(in. Hg) 

1I.0 

1.'" 

Sn 

1,"' 

~.J 

1.(0 

1.f,O 

'. (' 

1 • .5' 

l~, D 

1.0 

Comments 

Nomograph Assumed Data 

Avg,Ts __ _ %H20 __ _ 

Avg.Ps __ _ Avg.-.JAP __ _ 

Avg.Pb __ _ DGMY __ _ 

Avg.Tm __ _ DGMAH@ __ _ 
Date 

Test No. 

Sampling Location 

Client 

Project No. 

Job location 

Testers 

'averse Sample 

ort/Point Time 

lemin) 

( ( 6 

"L t; 

.J tf) 

'f f( 

.s 10 

, , 1.'-

"t )0 

.1 ~~ 

"f 4£0 

..5 If,S 

I I so 

IZ. ~.J' 

3 60 

'f is 

.j 7d , , 7S 

'Z. r'() 

!) (~ 

1 1,11 

J q~ 

, fOt) 

2- 'OS 

J &-,0 

~ ((5 

oS ,'lJ> 

12...t 

Clock 

Time 

lehrs:mll!l 

11,51 

Averaged 

values 

· 

Pilol 

Pressure 

(AP. in H2O 

a.a" 

f) (n 

Ot./)7 

O.t ~ 

at.:3 

tl ()' 

ll .. ~1 

(:),01 

O.U 

tJ.l7-

~E" 

~.D 1 

(lOl 

~.(tJ 

O./i 

6.0'1 

0.0/ 

0(12 

6. ,'\ 

1,]6 

6.1/ 

fJ..fJS 

0,1 () 

(9,1 ~ 

f!), z~ 

Module No. 1 S'II <80'1<t3 

DGM Y value _~l !..=.CJd~9.4:-_ DGM llH@value_-=---,I,1J' <Pe:..'Z-==~~-,- Probe 10 (~~ e.&~ 

t .. 7 I 

N~~\';j ---:a:,lo"~~~...!iI~(w"l-#...,..,,............ 

Orifice DGMTemp DGMTemp Stack 

Pressure IN OUT Temp 

Sample Gas 

Volume 

1 (118. in H2O l(lm,deg Fl Tm.degF) [ITs. dea F} Nm.ft3) 

Initial Pilot leak Check 0 . bO 

Final Pilot Leak Check O.OD 

Initial Train Leak Check 0.090 ft3@.I.:l: . ..Jn.Hg 

Final Train leak Check Q ,oaD ft3@JCin.Hg 

Initilll $ampllng Time ---!\~l '-,,'i~' __ _ Anal Sampling Time ,3. . c::" 

''f 

Impinger Heater Probe Filter Pump 

S.G.temp Box Temp Temp Outlet Vac. 

I(deg F) ledeg F) 11degF) Ildea F) I(in. Hg) 

/, 'f 78' 77 ,-, >~'TJz..1... ~I -v. --;;-

(). lS 1'() 77 71 75l.S' SS' ~, S 

2. ft\1 Iff 77 71 .1 S't "l r; SI ? /) 

1" &/. 7 f?'f 73' 73 "lSI: tfZ- '17 lS.O 

~.C r~· 78' 7'1 {j('S.10 l(y 1<.It 

0.']' ,..2 7K' 7¥ 'J7J.OO t.(7 '1. ,<, 

0,"\' q;o ~<b -g.c.., "1-)"~ 4£0 17 S10 . .,,, 4~ -rkf --:1-4 1.+~_~'l Lfll 'l..~ 

~F12 q;tJ +I ~3 ["'.:l.9.~ "Z. Lt"'> -q.c'J 

'.0" ~"l fI-t ~ 1""l>t't.7t> 4,\ I~.> 

C), 3'1 -~'Z. -::J-fT ~) !AI,,¥) Ltr" ~.J 

0,4"1 ~() 7"7 ,I;.. 391,'( 1 ,,'" "t. ) 

f). 3~. I'IJ 7"1 7~ J1~,2..3 'l:3 7.1' 

1.4. r B'{ 77 '1'L ~f/,. t( 7 4ft ?if) 

III so ~3 7Y 7'1 1.{1JZ.,~o 43 IS 

1'3( 8'7- 7V 74 . &{(fi,a:> Coli V,J' 

0.:1"" ~'1.. 7"'- 7~ 1I11. "f "f IY3 ,. V 

«.( • If)' -~-:\ ?~ 7C/ '''''1.2'1 f(.:J tf.t; 

6,~1j g'( 71 7'1 Il(If. r, tt ... II~ t..' ~s 714 7" litf.tf $I' '-I '-I ['IS 

11,1'..3 1',-( 'if'() 71./ I '{"j 't. 0'1 'I.~ 9.0 

1-{41'1 8'''1 yo 71 !4{'J1~ S'l 'It.{ S.6 

,),'f'f 8"J KO 7'1 l'Pfit_'fS 'fj to 

S,57 rL. 7~ 7) ['1t.{f; 7 C, 'l.fj 17. J 

l,7:0 i'7 ~CI 7-'" !4 ~f, etc. '-Ill ~p 

Stack Static Press. .~ () « "Z.. 

Barometric Press. 30 1'),<. Stack Absolute Press. ____ _ 

Stack Diameter _----

Stack Area 

Ambient Temp --.::113lJ,..."..,...... . ---

Comments 

; 

, 

Iq·z.~tto "l.f fit 8c>.:S 73.£" '1/,/,{, 7 g ~finalvol ~ 

I (Ava:"AP) IIAva.MIl (Avg. Tml ICAvg. Ts) .-Inlt. vol 

.-sampled vol Nomograph Assumed Data 

Filler 1.0. ______ _ Avg.Ts __ _ 

Avg.Ps __ _ 

Avg.Pb __ _ 

%H20 __ _ 

Avg:'/l\P __ _ Sample 1.0. ______ _ DGMY __ _ 

Avg.Tm __ _ DGM£\H@ __ _ 

Review by On-Site Regulalory Rep __ ~___ _ __ 

Signature Date MeIbocl5 0 .... Shut. FOkMSl. 1120191 
RE)(TECHNicACSERVICES, LLc' M,P.D..t]al Methods Data Sheet 

Date 

Stack Static Press. of-O.lO . 

Barometric Press. 30', &2*?:' Module No. ( S.U 30 'If J Initial Pilot Leak Check tJ. () 0 DGM Y value I ( 00 'I Final Pilot Leak Check --"-i:------

Test No. --...+11':----

Sampling Location ---f-~~..---­

Client 

Project No. ·O:-:iz.P,'-'-t:.l-=---

DGM t.H@value I (zt Initial Train Leak Check Q VO :) In.Hg Slack Absolute Press. ____ _ 

Job Location ~~I:Iforn~=.l-­ Testers -=<--;;.....:..0'-__ 

Pr?be ID (I.~~= (J,..~ I Fimil Train Leak Check O,OD I ft3@ln.Hg 

Pltot Cp . 4t ~ _ _ _ Initial Sampling Time 11.{.'"l. L No~ I.D. 6! ss Jt 7:..' Final Sampling Time _l .... l& ..... •.... 1. .......... ':) __ _ 

If ,"7 I Y 

averse Sample Clock Pilot Orifice DGM Temp DGM Temp Slack Sample Gas Impinger Heater Probe Filter Pump 

)rt/Point Time Time Pressure Pressure IN OUT Temp Volume S.G. temp Box Temp Temp OuUet Vac. 

(min) I (hrs:min) (d?, in H20 (All. in H20 I(Tm. deqr=l l(Tm. deo.F) !ITs. den F) INm,II3)(deQ F) Ideg F) ICdeg F) I(deg F) 1(ln. Hg) 

, I 

7-

] 7.J" 

Lt 12 0 

oJ 12,0 

l.. I S5 

2-

~ 

't f.O 

,5 11.71 ~ ( . (,0 

-Z 56 

l liJ b. LS $,1.5 8""9 e"1 73 I$'I~, S'l t{C 

't 

.5 12 0 

f I 

t 17,0 

') 

'i I/'tb 

5 

f I.~ 

1.. 

'] 

"t 

.s 

Averaged IO.'t~ JP~ . <£.1. '8' 3""\'~ '(C( r, 17'" -t-final vol 

values I(Avg . ..Jt.P) I(Avg.lUi) lAvg. Tm) I(Avg. Ts) -t-inlt. vol 

Slack Diameter ____ _ 

Slack Alea ... i>Is----

Ambient Temp/l .tJ .... 

Comments 

t~ l"''' -t-sampJed vol Nomograph Assumed Data 

Filter 1.0. ______ _ Avg.Ts __ _ %H20 __ _ 

Avg.Ps __ _ 

Avg.Pb __ _ Avg • ..JAP __ _ 

DGMY __ _ Sample I.D. ______ _ 

Avg.Tm __ _ DGMt.H@ __ _ 

Review by On-Site Regulatory Rep ______ --:c--

Signature Date 
( 

RVNNO" CAfe . 

TI~E. 

AUllmed Nomogr3ph D~13 

~Qo. S~=c: Pr"U$I.j .... ill H2O _~ Preu ...... In Hg 

AOSO·":' SIKII P ..... "' Hg 

Sl3ck T .... I\. de9 F 

P..wnl MD<IllOflI 

P_IC02 

P..,..,.02 

p_nCO 

P_IN:! 

0.., Slid< ~I Mol \~ ~ 

W.I Slit>;. ~I Mel w~~ go.....,. 

CluirI<I S&m;llil"lo;l ~ ... CI ......... 

A .... ~veIcof)' 1'IN<l UP~ iII .. 20 

0"13 )101 c. '" H2O ~:. Mel", """",e. ill Hg 

A......ag. l.IelO< T..,-,p. O&g F 

Melor ~br.I~on FaClClf (y) 

p,~ CoolI'ICGflI 

C~IClII ltd Nowe CI m,m". ,no 

ACW NQwe O.atnele<. ,no 

,,-

~~_l<Ift 

~""pecleo)p 

~Qu"""""")101 

_d~Poon" 

• ........ Il0l p",1'I;>n1 

fo!31 r .... :o ...,,·..,., 

ACT~~ A (No Auu mptlon,) 

oJNl.r . 

rr~EA. f;;~!.J NOZZLE DIA .• (In.) 

TOTAL TIME. (mlnulu) 

METER CAUBRATION fACfCR (Y VAlU!:) 

PITOT COEfFICIENT 

~VG SORT 'P. I"' H2O) 

)(.~H20) 

'.IEHR TEMf' .. (C~ f ) 

STAne PRess. (if> HlO) 

ST loCK TEMP. (0egM FJ 

!I.ETER RAW VOI.U~E.IQl Il) 

OT~l H20VAPOR.. (ITII) 

C02 IN ST ACi< GO.S. ('%j 

02 IN STACK GAS. (%) 

CO IN STACK GAS. ('%) 

N2 IN SlACK GAS. I") 

TOTAl PAAT. CATCH. (mvl 

I'fYOROG£N IN FUEl.. (%) 

CARBON IN FUEL ('%) 

SUl.F\JR!N FilEt. ("10) 

NlmOGEN IN FUEL 1"1 

OXYGEN IN FlJEL. (11.) 

GeV.(BTUr.I» 

F-FACfOR. IOSCFIMMIlTUI 

CALCULATEO VALUES 

METER VOL ' .... eT STO, /01." J 

~~TER VOl.. DRY STD. leu ~ ) 

MEfERYIX. Act StWt Cond (cu ft.) 

H2O IN ST.lCK GAs. (%) 

51...cK GAS MOlECIJlAR W; 

ElICfSS AIR.. (") I!!'!<'''' . STACKGASIiEl , (1'011 

G4S Fl.OVo1U.fE. {ACFU) 

STl'"1'tO' .... R..I.T"E. mSVIJ) 

I$CK!:·IETIC. I'lloj 

PMn CCNe. (GRJACF) 

PAf'lT. CONC .. (GR-CSCF) 

P.o.R l CONe. (GRIOSCfC7,,02) 

CONC. (GR'OSCFQ I2%C02) 

CONe. (GmSCfC~"'EA) 

E!.tSSiCN RA!E.f t.t~ 1 

F". CTOR. (OSCM..u.IIlTU) 

EIoIIS5:0NS. (1c.!.lMISTU\ 

11'"~-:lSOol 

a;o"'CI.! 

,~ 

MG.1-'.A 

Sllltl<~PrcP U~'(~) 

Sill'" to PfCIl U~. (1.4) 

"" SllIck FlOw ("'0.':_1 

In:..",ltOOilO ...,,1..-

M"'SC 

Whyco 

PPL 

Chrome Emissions Compliance Testing 

12-Jll!-oS 

Nomogr.lph 

""'" 

"" "" ,,~ 

2g~2 ,,,. ~" nw lO t l7 JO 117 

,~ 

~ ". ". ,~ ,~ 

"'., "" "'., "" "" ,,~ 

"'" "" "" 10~~ 1.05 1'O~ " .... 28&0. ,,~ 

281ii(! 281110 2!1!i(i ,~ "" "" ,,~ ,,~ ,,~ 

,., 

"., '" '" , ... ,,~ 

' 00", "" "'~ '" t; ,,~ ,,~ ".M o J2S4 0303 1 ,=, 

o JUS 0.l155 0315 

'" '" 1.21 OoooS42g OOCOS42. 000050<2 

"M 'M ,,~ ". '" ... ,. ,. ,. 

• • • '" "" "" ~., " : '" " , , , o 31~5 031" 03155 

I.IXliiO '" ' 0000 "" ,-"" ,,~ ,,~ "M 05700 "'" O!~1 

"" 'M' ,U. ." ~" M' ". ". ale lOll ,~. 1017 12C12T8 131473 1214,]5 ." '" M. 

" " " '" ~. ". " " " OOOS<8 '" o OOS02 '"'" , , "" .. ,

, , , , , , 

" " " " " " , , , 

123210 127251 12G 102 

120068 124 0 12 '23030 '28 4/1 123TH 125.6!lD 

'" n. ,u ,,~ ,,~ 2857 

·1 18T~ _11 87!oO .1t!750 ,,.. " .. "" '''''' lUtQ 34.:62 ,~, 36g1 

'00 

3257 

, 

,m , -

"" , 

""" , 00000 , 00000 

2S1120185118eo1 

o ocoeo 2U1151111

'.00000 

0 ~7"$ 288286121883035 .- .OiVoO' 1lO1\!IO' .0""''01 

.000052 """, .ooo~ 

OQCOO l8lg 00000111- o OOC02 11~ 

.tOIV.C' oov.vo .,." "l)1li01 or!ll\o'OO ~" 000155 OOQld 000112 

..... '"'' ... " 

"'"'''' 0000018 o IlOO(lgJ .~, 1I031a g$llH 

155408 " 155"8 " 155408 " 

"" "" 0.25 

1 8MT 11.,0 112H 

170'25 l1aaS4 11 0755 

110115 10 &355 107:l3 1 

AVERAGe 

'''' 

1 181 

, 

'" """ ,,~ " .. l~ 

101 "" ~ 

Inoel 

" ". " 

" 

000S4) '" 

, 

, 

• " " , • 

12$$21 

'" ,,~ 

'II ~ 411!! ) 

, J ~. 

, 00000 

"00000 26012Jl<'IJ S8:U1 

aDlVlOl 

.oooo~ 

000001110. .,.,. 

-0 • ." 

COOl$! 

1SUI 

"",,' .. ," 

.,,"" 1554'B 

""" I 7110 

17 08TB 

10 Sl l lUX TECH 
( I'IUNSO* 

!lATE. 

nME. 

Anumld Nom01lfaph Dati 5:xk S~~ ............... ., l't2O 

~I'-u ........ kg: 

~u SIad< ""-It ... ,,~ 

S:xI< r..~. 0.; F 

~t"""..:ure 

"-tC02 

P<l'tent02 

P~tCO 

P...,,,,tN2 

Dry Stadt Gn Mel w''Il~~ glmoI 

WI! StJdc ~II..IOI w.~ g.~ 

0.""" Sarf'llllnQ R..:It.. cu /II ....... 

'\''0'1<3;1 vekgty "OlIO t)P~ It! H20 

CI:OO;t'lC.11\ HW 

ADooIut. M.II' !'no ..... , in Hg 

Average ~I e .... Ttn'IIl. d40g F 

!.!OW CaI'Dn~on FaCIO< (1) 

Pilot COillicont 

CalCulal.tC Houl. 001"'.1 101'. In . 

.. etJaI Nc.<:zl, 0,_:. •. In 

)(.faev 

~ Nu, t.Q ~ 

Mo<Jmm •• _)p 

Cotros""""""O I. .......... m)li 

Numoet '" Somglftg PO"tS """'too Per 1"00"1 

ACTUAL DATA (No AnumplJon$1 

2MB. " ...HOI ., ,"I 

.IA& Ftf 

NOZZl..E OIA., (ill' 

TO· Al nME. {I ... MU) 

METER CAUBAA l iON F.o.cT~ (Y VAlUE) 

PIlOT COEFI<lClEHT 

"''1G.SQ.RT. 'P. ( .. H20) 

H. ( n. H2O) 

\ iETEA TEMP • O~" F) 

srAnCPRfSS .(1o! K20 ) 

SiACKTEMP. Itl'9'M F) 

~.ETE.~ RAWVOlUUe.. leu n ) 

TOTAl H2O VAPOR. 1""1 

COl iN STACK G,l.S. (%j 

021N Si..,Cl< GAS. ('Mol 

CO IN STACK GAS. (%1 

N21N STACK GAS. (%) 

TOTAl. PART CATCH,I"'9) 

HYOROGEN IN FUEL 1%) CAReON IN FUEL. 1%) 

SIJI.FUR IN FUEL. ('to) 

NITROGEN IN FUEL. 1"") 

OXYGE1<l IN FUEL. I") 

GCV. (BTU,lb) 

F-FACT R OSCF M'ABTUI 

, , " 

Why'" 

Thin Oense Chromo 

Chrome Emissions Compliance TestIng 

13-Juf-05 

Nomograph 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR 

PITOT TUBE 

I 

REVERSE-TYPE 

PITOT TUBE 

PROlE 

TEMPERATURE 

SENSOR 

"41- STACK 

·U....-WAll 

i 

FLEXIBLE 

TEFLON 

LINE 

\ 

J I 

PITOT MANOMETER 

THERMOMETERS 

DRY GAS METER AIR·t.G'HT 

PUMP 

IM'I'~G ERTRAIN 

THERMOMETER 

METHOD 304 CHROMIUM SAMPLING TRAIN 

REX TECHNICAL SERVICES. LLC 

CHECK 

VALVE 

VACUUM 

LINE 
I 

r 

I 

I 

r 

(J 

(C 

I 

I 

I 

I 

1 

] , 

1 

j 

APPENDIXB 

Process Logs, Laboratory correspondence and Equipment Calibrations 

REX TECH 
( 

IPPL Compliance Stack Testing 

'Date: 7/12/05 i 

Time Exhaust Reading Volts/Amps Volts/Amps Dynes Reading Inspector (inches) 

10:45 AM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 <38 Jose Duran 

11:15AM I 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

11:45AM I 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

12:15 PM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 <38 Jose Duran 

12:45 PM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

1:15 PM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

1:45 PM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 <38 Jose Duran 

2:15 PM 1.2 8.0/3400 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

2:45PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Jose Duran 

3:15 PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Art L'Heureux 

3:45PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 <38 Art L'Heureux 

4:15PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Art L'Heureux 

4:45PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Art L'Heureux 

5:15 PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Art L'Heureux 

5:45PM 1.2 8.0/3200 8.5/3200 Art L'Heureux 
I ( 

I 

I 

J 

) 

J 

J 

J 

j 

J 

Client~ Cl) 

Process Rate and Fuel Usa~?;ta ~heet 

Project No. C-(H·-l' Date 11 s= r--

~rl, Test 1 

Material 1 Usage Start (0 :00 

End 

Material 2 Usage Start 

~. 0 {'{1... j!u-. ("~ End 

( /.t e f )"PCtc .(/'S ... oI~_,"" " e) 

Fuel Type Start 

End 

Line Speed 

ProductID 

Other Data 

(h .~L 1 ~---" ( \cJ ' I~ ~l,o D 

lu r(( ,)2DU 

\)c.vy"Y &-""\ ~) I~ ·.(S- \ ;~ t( ~l> 

D,,-,~~ d-/\. s~L:, bR- \0: I ~ ~,.~ ~r /A .. L , 

_~ ,-r"t \'It-f r I (: D1- -Ie, 

l r . (( '~30 ),' .. L,\ II '(}5 . ).~ 

11:(9S- ~) . ~ ,. 

l"l.~O 

(_41..;-

It-( S-S--

L<;;:-'3r 

( L. ~ tJ, 

llo '1r 

l'7:0)' 

REX TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC 

Initials 7NB 

Test 2 Test 3 

~,b 

>~~ 

1.~ 

)~" 

1:~ 

J,' 

~,' 

),c, 
DP DP DP DP 

Test Time E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 H1 H2 FX 1 2 3 4 

q "!>o ~ ~o ~o <;sQ 'is ~5 liS <;;- ~1 "\.5 'lj '15 tt,; '15 l35 1~5 100 .1\ ~ .S' 

Ci. ~ () ~() <W ~- ~. "2i) ", 'is' q5 G5 't5 &.15 I(S 45 '-15 "1.5 L~"j lZ,5 100 1.5 Z 1.) 

1O 3D "W ~ ~ ~ 'is I~' t:;,r 'i, ~~ '15 4S ~L5 "5 'l5 155 13.J 10() .5 2 S 

1,6 )~ "lo -;,0 "i.O ~ ~ 'i.)_ ~S".- ~5 tis <is ItJ LtJ '1.5 'l5 'IS 135 135 IOU .1 1- J 

II 36 'be> ~ 'ii1 ?P '15 <15 '\5 G.5 <i'S L{,5 't5 .. ( 5" LLj 1,/5 /'6.s- 165" _Jl.XJ j Z- 3 

II $11 ~c) &0 l~_ _xc:> 1rlt etS t:"i5 ~5 ~5 'i5 tiS I..L5 "/S '15 "I) ""35 I~ 100 5 :2 I} 

l2 3c ~ W "iSO 710_ '15 G5 C\5 '\5 <;5 L\5 t15 ttJ (15 'l5 1:35 1~5 Int) .5 2- .stb "'-'0 30 ~ ~ 8:> hd_ ~ 4.t ~u q5 ~5_ tt"5"' 'tJ '15 tt5 ~15 J3j I~ 'Od .5 2 S 

\ 30 ~o ~() ~ Iw li5 £1'5 '15 ~5 £15 liS q~ LIS 'IS '-IS 135 135 IC() "5 2..- .5 1 !,O ~ ~ CZi) 'iO ~() <\'5 '\5 G\..S C\,5 Ci:~ tLJ 115 1.15 I.IS 'L' Ij5 135 JO() ,"5" Z. .S 

Z. ~o 4Y'> ~) ~ to C\S C\j \5 ~5 ~S "I) ttJ 1.'.5 'JS "IS 13$ ,35 100 .~ "). ·r Cf-t 1) 

~o ~ Sso ~ W <;5 Cj5 ~ ci5 CiS t.tj LiS ·LS Lf5 '!j Jar 13r loil ~1' Z .J 

3 ~o <;,0 <XO ~ ~ qS ~5 <\5" c:ry "tf £/5 (-/5 415 115 1.'5 135 IjS 'Do .5 z.... .S" 

-1'0 ~D _&.> ~ g:) ~ OLS ,s 'i5 c:u /!if '1S liS t.fS Cf'S 415 Iss I~S lOiJ .'f 2- oJ 

tf '30 ~o w ~u $t) ~) &\"j" ~5 t:\5 'is '-/<> 115 '/.5 t{S IJ5 1"&.5 ,35 lilt) .5 L .. s . J,( ~ C> 30 50 ~ 1'&2 ~ 'is C\) '15 '1.") 'i5 't5 ttf LIS *'15 '15 155 )SS IOf) .S z. .s 

I 
\ '., DP DP DP DP 

Test Time E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 H1 H2 FX 1 2 3 4 

" ,S 1\ / ,S 1\ , S 1\ J 3' 1 

c.so \ I \ / \ I I 

10 \ / ~ -I '\ "/ 

10'0 \ 7 \ / 

II \ / \ I \ I 1t ~o \ -I \ rJ 

12 7 \ 1\ 

lZ,so , / I \ I 

t \ \ 7 \ I 

I "I" \ J \/ \ I 

';). \I '{ } I ~"O " 1\ _\ I 

3" I \ I \ \ \1 sn I II \ (../ II ;\ "\ 1 I 

"L ~rI \ \ 7 \ 1 I 1\ I \ / \ I \ 

I \ / \ / \ I \ 'f \ I _\ 

I 

J \ I I 1\ 

J \ / / \ 

\ / I / '. '\ u 

I \ I II 

I 
_

__ 

LtLBORA TOR Y ANAL YSIS REPORT 

( 

To: Jeremy Bidwell 

Rex Technical Services 

61 Hoskina Rd. 

Bloomneld. CT 06002. 

AnalyalJ: Hc.UVBlenl Chromiwn 

AnslyUc:s1 Method: Hexavalent CbcomiUJlt by OSHA ID 215 

SBlIlpic 

l'iJImw 

Test I 

TC8f'l 

Tl!llt3 

TC5t4 

Test S 

tll316 

TQSl7 

Ruscnt Blank 

Volume 

mL 

730 

570 

610 

S31 

SilO 

620 

460 

:lSO 

Cgmpgnent 

Haxavalcnt Chromium 

HexavaU:nt Chromium 

Hl1X4va1cot Chromium 

HCXolvaient Chromium 

Hexavalent Chromium 

Hllxavaloftt Chramlum 

Hexavalent Chromium 

Hoxavalent Chromiwn 

l!I 

S.26 

5.02 

H8 

0.7' 

0.14 

1.00 

<O.4S 

<0.24 

1'"'. 1 

£SIS EAvlrollmOllml Hcalm Laborlltory 

100 Scbetbc Drill ct. Svita ".$ 

CromWlllI. CT 06416 

(860) 63 SoH7S 01 (100) l~l-490l 

Sta!Q of CQIl.aecticUI Approval 'PH O~ 10 

lab AcorcdtWlonl: ArnA *144. AlItA BLLAP il6945 

Report #: COSl0908 

P.O. No.: P1atins Both Staclc.s 

Date Received: 7/1412005 

Date Reported: 8/1512005 Page 1 of 1 

Analysis porformed by an c"tertlaJ lAb. Con~enlrlltiona reponed ~ ba.1=d on air volume. provided. 

Analyst: Amj'L. warGon Date; !li 15/200S 

AUG 15,20C5 16:15 8';0 635 6750 ?ag~ ... 
I ( , 

~tududTAT ,/ly/e;' 

o J/hJ'IJJlS6TAT 

CJ Nut Dill' lUl6ll TAT 

o SilIlIIJ Pllt Ill!6lITA T . 

PltIUI: at/J llI""d b &JlB!I MW)lIW, 

AdtJiJlOIIiIl ~ .Mr. 

o Una 0 SRF 0 A.R 

o /SSlS 0 Z 0 CIairM 

Pol. o~ eu. No. 

POI, Ref 1# (If llequind): I PbOllt No: n (l 2'1 Z. Jr( J I 0 Phone Resulta 

vi' 7e~f I 

./ IT,,,1" 2 

;/ kr.s r :s 

v te'Jf t.f 

r/ '~f ~. v ~$f (" 

v' 1L~ 7 

../' 1~Ift.it'"f 0'-1 

~---4--------+---~~------------.. ,--~-----------r-----r--~----~--~--~ 

I ~---+-------r----+---------·~----~~-----·-----r-----+---~--~----~--~ 

FOR LAB NOTES (>:'\L Y: 

.- -.- PINK • '.:t;STO~fl:FJ_O~"'· 

,"It.''I • J, 
I 

I 

~ 

b 

r 

\ i \ I 

\~ 

I 

b _ Q,7 S'S""". 

C),C:G~ 

(- ~ 

J '--"'7 OJ7 .. 5.> 

e. 0.6& Lf 

( 

G 

Ct _....::O~ . ....::;(.;_I_ <&_ 

I~. O/:\Glj 

o,,~<i) 

C O:.~~?:: 

d_O~~)?;5' 

~O....:.:......:.l-_o_r_ , e-

'1\ .9~ o 

I 

cO 

~ -=: 00"] S 

\' 

C .. ~: < O,ll.~'·) 

,t Jd e;, - ( .... 
Rex Technical Services, LLC 

EPA Method 5 Meter CalJbraUon 

Pre-Test Orlft!:e Method 

EnglJ.sh Meter Box Units, English K' Factor 

FilenlUllC : R:\REX TECH files\Administtative\REX fOJDlS\M5 ca1·by-orifioc filcs\[Rex Tech Module 1 March'()4 annual 5PTCQCAL.m)51'TO 

odel/l: 

rial II: 

!!!!! ! 

20 lOA 

80993 

Revised: 8/1/97 Version: 1.01 

Date:--- ----> 

Barometric Pressure: .----> 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum:···> 

03/12104 

29.65 (in. Hg) 

13.99 (in. Hg) 

fPORTAN~ For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg greater than the Tbcon:tical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

IPORTAN~ The Critical Orifice Coefficien!, K', must be enlered iu Eoglish units, (tt)"3·(deg R)"O.5/«in.Hg)·(JDin». 

I!!!!! 

-----DRY GAS METER READINGS -CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGSVolunu: Volume Volume nitial Temps. Final Temps. Orifice K' Orifice Actual - Ambient Temperaton: •• 

DeliaH Time Initial Final Total Wet OUdet Wet Oudet Serialll Coefficient Vacoum Initial Final 

(in H2O) (min) (cu tt) (CD tt) (CD tt) (degF) (degF) (degF) (degF) (number) (see above) (in Hg) (degF) (deg F) 

0.27 10.00 592.000 595.114 3.114 77.0 77.0 78.0 77.0 140·0 0.2299 26.0 75.0 77.0 

0.45 10.00 595.300 599.287 3.987 78.0 77.0 78.0 77.0 140·1 0.3004 25.0 77.0 77.0 

0.87 10.00 599.700 605.164 5.464 78.0 77.0 78.0 77.0 140-2 0.4127 23.5 77.0 77.0 

1.75 10.00 605.401 612.937 7.536 78.0 77.0 79.0 78.0 140-3 0.5746 21.0 77.0 77.0 

2.30 10.00 613.300 622.076 8.776 79.0 78.0 80.0 78.0 140·4 0.6680 20.0 77.0 77.0 

****·******·*****·*···*******·****************·**IUEStnLTS •••••• * •••••• *** •• *.************ ••••••• *****.*****. 

DRY GAS METER- --ORIFICE-- - DRY GAS METERIOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME CALIBRATION FACTOR 

IRRECTE[~ORRECTED CORRECTE[CORRECTEI:NOMINAL Y 

Vm{sld) Vm{sld) VCI(sld) VCI(sld) Vcr Value 

(cu tt) (liters) (CD tt) (liters) (cu tt) (number) 

3.034 85.9 2.944 83.4 3.017 0.971 

3.884 110.0 3.844 108.9 3.946 0.990 

5.328 150.9 5.280 149.5 5.422 0.991 

7.358 208.4 7.352 208.2 7.548 0.999 

8.568 242.7 8.547 242.1 8.775 0.997 

Average Y ••••••• > 0.990 

lie; For Calibration Factor Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration meier to the dry gas meier, 

acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is +·0.02. 

Variation 

(number) 

·0.019 

0.000 

0.001 

0.010 

0.008 

For Orifice Calibration Factor dH@, the orifice differential pressure in inches of H20 that equates to 0.75 cfin of air 

at 68 F IlDd 29.92 inches ofHg, acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is +-0.2. 

SIGNED: ____________________ _ 

--ORIFICE --

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

DclfaH@ 

Value Value Variation 

(in H2O) (mmHlO) (in H20) 

1.707 43.36 ·0.009 

1.669 42.40 ·0.047 

1.710 43.44 ·0.006 

1.773 45.03 0.056 

1.722 43.75 0.006 

1.716 43.60 <: •• _. Avernge dH@ 

Dale: __________ _ 

Average 

(degF) 

76.0 

77.0 

77.0 

77.0 

77.0 
.. . 

I \ 

( 

I~ 

I 

\ 

I~ 

INDUSTRDNICS 

S E RV r C E COMPANY 

489 Sullivan Avenue, South Windsor, cr 06074, 860·289·1551, Fax 860·289.3526 

www.induscronics.com 

SENSOR CALIBRATION REPORT 

CUSTOMER: REX TECHNICAL SERVICE 

61 HOSKINS ROAD 

BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002 

REPORT #: 082404-SCC 

CUSTOMER P.O: 

ITEM CALIBRATED: 

DATE CALIBRATED: 

0408-03 

TYPE"K"TIIERMOCOUPLE 

AC-K-125-G-A-P-33 

AUGUST 24, 2004 

This report may not be reproduced, except in fuU; unless permission for the publication 

of an approved abstract is obtained in writing from the calibration organization issuing 

this report. Calibrated in accordance with SOP-009. 

sm 

041 

TEST TEMP 

32DEGF 

212 

500 

TIC READS 

32.7DEGF 

212.5 

5020 

ERROR OF 

INDICATION 

+0.7 

+0.5 

+2.0 

Calibrations performed within the Lab's Scope of accreditation are indicated by the presence of 

the A2LA Logo and Certificate Number on this Certificate and are performed in compliance 

with ISOlIEC 17025. Any measurements on an accredited calibration not covered by that 

Lab's scope are noted within the data andlor accompanying paperwork. Equipment used 

conforms to: ISOIlEC 17025, MIL-H-6875 H, AMS 2750C, MIL STD. 45662A, ANZI Z540, 

SAC 5621-K, 10 CFR 21, ASTM E-220 AND ASTM E-230, ASTM207& AN.Sf/NSCL 

Z540-1-1994. 

I UI\~ ... vumT , 

QA4.11.09 (7103) Page 10f2 

('" A I Tn» & TT(\N~ tJ1j' ATINC 14'1 I4'Ml?NT~ 
I 

L 

,., " 

,.' 

REPORT #: 082404-5CC 

Equipment used to calibrate the above is as follows: 

FLUKE 8810A 

SERIAL NUMBER: 2370 I 05 

CALffiRATED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 

DUE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2004 

N.I.S. T. REFERENCE NUMBER: 11-UT3KL-J-I 

PLATINUM-PLATINUM 10% RHODIUM TEST THERMOCOUPLE 

SERIAL NUMBER: 268226 

CALffiRATED: FEBRUARY 24, 2003 

DUE: FEBRUARY 24, 2005 

N.I.S.T. TEST NUMBER: 268226 

FLUKE 2190A 

SERIAL NUMBER: 2180061 

CALffiRATED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 

DUE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2004 

N.I.S.T. REFERENCE NUMBER: ll-UT3KL-l-1 

Copies of these calibration results are on file at Industronics Service Company. 

We hereby certifY that the above is a true copy of our records, traceable to the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology. 

and 

This 

applies 

calibration 

only 

was 

to results 

performed 

associated 

by 

to 

~ item named above. ~1U'f'#k'J/ . ~ 

lNDUSTRONICS SERVICE COMPANY 

Andrew 

~~41~ R. Monsees 

Manager, Thermocouple Department 

QA4.11.09 (7/03) Page 2 of2