48790 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves a security zone of limited 

size and duration. This proposed rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A 

preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Revise § 165.1199 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.1199 Security Zones; Military Ocean 

Terminal Concord (MOTCO), Concord, 

California. 

(a) Location. The security zone(s) 

reside(s) within the navigable waters of 

Suisun Bay, California, extending from 

the surface to the sea floor, within 500 

yards of the three Military Ocean 

Terminal Concord (MOTCO) piers in 

Concord, California. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section, ‘‘designated representative’’ 

means any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer or any Federal, 

state, or local law enforcement officer 

who has been designated by the Captain 

of the Port San Francisco (COTP) to act 

on the COTP’s behalf. The COTP’s 

representative may be on a Coast Guard 

vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel, 

a Federal, state, or local law 

enforcement vessel, or a location on 

shore. 

(c) Regulations. (1) The security 

zone(s) described in paragraph (a) of 

this section will be in force during 

active military onloading and/or 

offloading operations and at any time a 

vessel loaded with munitions is present 

at a pier. 

(2) When one or more piers are 

involved in onload or offload operations 

at the same time, there will be a 500- 

yard security zone for each involved 

pier. 

(3) Under the general regulations in 

subpart D of this part, entry into, 

transiting or anchoring within the 

security zone(s) described in paragraph 

(a) of this section is prohibited during 

times of enforcement unless authorized 

by the COTP or a designated 

representative. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the security zone(s) 

during times of enforcement must 

contact the COTP or a designated 

representative on VHF–16 or through 

the 24-hour Command Center at 

telephone (415) 399–3547 to obtain 

permission to do so. Vessel operators 

given permission to enter or operate in 

the security zone(s) must comply with 

all directions given to them by the 

COTP or a designated representative. 

(5) Upon being hailed by the COTP or 

designated representative by siren, 

radio, flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel approaching the 

security zone(s) must proceed as 

directed to avoid entering the security 

zone(s). 

(d) Notice of enforcement or 

suspension of enforcement of security 

zone(s). During periods that one or more 

security zones are enforced, the COTP 

or a designated representative will issue 

a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and/or 

notify mariners via actual notice onscene. In addition, COTP maintains a 

telephone line that is maintained 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week. The public 

can contact COTP at (415) 399–3547 to 

obtain information concerning 

enforcement of this section. When the 

security zones are no longer needed, the 

COTP or designated representative will 

cease enforcement of the security zones. 

Upon suspension of enforcement, all 

persons and vessels are granted general 

permissions to enter, move within, and 

exit the security zones, but should 

remain cognizant of the applicable 

restricted area designated in 33 CFR 

334.1110. 

Dated: July 1, 2015. 

Gregory G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2015–20110 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0454; FRL–9932–34– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Movement of the Northern Virginia 

Area From Virginia’s Nonattainment 

Area List to Its Maintenance Area List 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the 

Commonwealth of Virginia for the 

purpose of moving the localities of 

Northern Virginia from Virginia’s 

regulatory list of nonattainment areas to 

its list of maintenance areas for fine 

particulate matter (PM2.5). In the Final 

Rules section of this Federal Register, 

EPA is approving the Commonwealth’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this action, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules 48791 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

writing by September 14, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2015–0454 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0454, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, Air 

Protection Division, Mail code 3AP30, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No EPA–R03–OAR–2015– 

0454. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by 

email at pino.maria@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

further information, please see the 

information provided in the direct final 

action, with the same title, that is 

located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ 

section of this Federal Register 

publication. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

Dated: August 4, 2015. 

William C. Early, 

Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2015–20022 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0394; FRL–9932–27– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of Iowa; 

Infrastructure SIP Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards, Section 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii), and a Supplemental SIP 

for Relevant Iowa Laws and 

Regulations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

elements of a State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submission from the State of Iowa 

for the 2008 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Lead 

(Pb) addressing the applicable 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

section 110, which requires that each 

state adopt and submit a SIP for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each new or revised 

NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These 

SIPs are commonly referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the structural components of each 

state’s air quality management program 

are adequate to meet the State’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

EPA is also proposing to approve a 

supplemental revision for the SIP to 

include article 1, section 2 of the Iowa 

Constitution, and portions of the Iowa 

Code and the Iowa Administrative Code 

to codify the relevant state laws as 

applied to conflict of interest 

provisions. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 14, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0394, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

3. Mail: Heather Hamilton, Air 

Planning and Development Branch, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 7, Air and Waste Management 

Division, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

your comments to Heather Hamilton, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 7, Air and Waste Management 

Division, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015– 

0394. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http://

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http://

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS