34806 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 1998 /Rules and Regulations

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 8.6-mile

radius of Fort Atkinson Municipal Airport,

excluding that airspace within the

Watertown, WI, Class E airspace area.

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on June 16,

1998.

David B. Johnson,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 98–17049 Filed 6–25–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–m

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98–AGL–24]

Modification of Class E Airspace;

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E

airspace at Youngstown Elser Metro

Airport, OH. A Global Positioning

System (GPS) Standard Instrument

Approach Procedure (SIAP) to Runway

(Rwy) 28 has been developed for

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport.

Controlled airspace extending upward

from 700 to 1200 feet above ground

level (AGL) is needed to contain aircraft

executing the approach. This action

adds an extension to the east for the

existing controlled airspace for

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, October 08,

1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle M. Behm, Air Traffic Division,

Airspace Branch, AGL–520, Federal

Aviation Administration, 2300 East

Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois

60018, telephone (847) 294–7568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On Wednesday, April 22, 1998, the

FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 71

to modify Class E airspace at

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, OH

(63 FR 19855). The proposal was to add

controlled airspace extending upward

from 700 to 1200 feet AGL to contain

Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations

in controlled airspace during portions of

the terminal operation and while

transiting between the enroute and

terminal environments.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received. Class E airspace

designations for airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth are

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9E dated September 10,

1997, and effective September 16, 1997,

which is incorporated by reference in 14

CFR 71.1. the Class E airspace

designation listed in this document will

be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71

modifies Class E airspace at

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, OH, to

accommodate aircraft executing the

proposed GPS Rwy 28 SIAP at

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport by

adding an extension to the east for the

existing controlled airspace for the

airport. The area will be depicted on

appropriate aeronautical charts.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. Therefore, this regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 208454, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9E, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 10, 1997, and effective

September 16, 1997, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward form 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Youngstown Elser Metro

Airport, OH [Revised]

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, OH

(lat. 40°57′38′′ N., long. 80°40′36′′ W.)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile

radius of the Youngstown Elser Metro

Airport; and within 4.0 miles either side of

the 108° bearing from the airport, extending

from the 6.4-mile radius to 8.8 miles east of

the airport, excluding that airspace within

the Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport,

OH, Class E airspace area, and excluding that

airspace within the New Castle, PA, Class E

airspace area.

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on June 16,

1998.

David B. Johnson,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 98–17051 Filed 6–24–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98–ASO–5]

Amendment of Class E Airspace;

Roxboro, NC

AGENCY: Fedeal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment modifies

Class E airspace at Roxboro, NC. A

Global Positioning System (GPS)

Runway (RWY) 6 Standard Instrument

Approach Procedure (SIAP) has been

developed for Person County Airport.

As a result, additional controlled

airspace extending upward from 700

feet Above Ground Level (AGL) is

needed to accommodate the SIAP and

for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)

operations at Person County Airport.

The Class E airspace has been increased

from a 6.4 to a 6.6-mile radius.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 13,

1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy B. Shelton, Manager, Airspace

Branch, Air Traffic Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, PO Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)

305–5586.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 1998 /Rules and Regulations 34807

1 38 FR 21494 (Aug. 9, 1973).

2 16 CFR 307 (1997).

3 16 CFR 307.5

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On April 6, 1998, the FAA proposed

to amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 71) by

amending Class E airspace at Roxboro,

NC, (63 FR 16718). This action provides

adequate Class E airspace for IFR

operations at Person County Airport.

Designations for Class E airspace

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth are

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9E, dated September 10,

1997, and effective September 16, 1997,

which is incorporated by reference in 14

CFR part 71.1. The Class E airspace

designation listed in this document will

be published subsequently in the Order.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received.

The Rule

This amendment to part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) modifies Class E airspace at

Roxboro, NC. A GPS RWY 6 SIAP has

been developed for Person County

Airport. Additional controlled airspace

extending upward from 700 feet AGL is

needed to accommodate the SIAP and

for IFR operations at Person County

Airport.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation, as the

anticipated impact is so minimal. Since

this is a routine matter that will only

affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule

will not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the criteria of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9E, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 10, 1997, and effective

September 16, 1997, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO NC E5 Roxboro, NC [Revised]

Person County Airport, NC

(lat. 36°17′08′′ N, long. 78°59′00′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet or more above the surface of the earth

within a 6.6-mile radius of Person County

Airport.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 29,

1998.

Jeffery N. Burner,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 98–16957 Filed 6–25–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 14

Amended Enforcement Policy

Statement Concerning Clear and

Conspicuous Disclosure in Foreign

Language Advertising and Sales

Materials

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; Statement of policy.

SUMMARY: The Commission has

determined that it would be appropriate

to amend its Enforcement Policy

Statement regarding clear and

conspicuous disclosures in foreign

language advertising and sales

materials. The amended policy

statement is intended to clarify the 1973

Enforcement Policy Statement.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda K. Badger or Matthew D. Gold,

San Francisco Regional Office, Federal

Trade Commission, 901 Market Street,

Suite 570, San Francisco, CA 94103,

(415) 356–5270.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Federal Trade Commission

(‘‘Commission’’) has noted that some

advertisements appearing in foreign

language publications feature

advertising copy in both English and a

foreign language, but include the

required disclosure only in English.

Because the target audience for these

ads is non-English speaking, the

Commission believes that the required

disclosure should be provided in the

language of the target audience, rather

than English. This policy statement

clarifies the Commission’s policy under

these circumstances.

The Commission, on two occasions,

has addressed the issue of disclosures in

foreign language advertising. On August

9, 1973, the Commission issued an

Enforcement Policy Statement dealing

with disclosures in foreign language

advertising. That policy statement,

which is codified at 16 CFR 14.9, reads

in pertinent part: ‘‘(a) Where cease-anddesist orders as well as rules, guides and

other statements require ‘clear and

conspicuous’ disclosure of certain

information, that disclosure must be in

the same language as that principally

used in the advertisements and sales

materials involved.1 Staff has been

informed that some companies have

interpreted the 1973 Enforcement Policy

Statement to mean that a disclosure

must be in English, regardless of the

target audience of the advertisement, if

the number of English words in an

advertisement exceeds the number of

foreign language words.

On November 4, 1986, the

Commission issued its Regulations

Under the Comprehensive Smokeless

Tobacco Health Education Act of 1986.2

Those regulations address, inter alia, the

language in which the Surgeon

General’s health warning must appear in

advertisements for smokeless tobacco

products. The smokless tobacco

regulations require that:

In the case of an advertisement for a

smokeless tobacco product in a

newspaper, magazine, periodical, or

other publication that is not in English,

the warning statement shall appear in

the predominant language of the

publication in which the advertisement

appears. In the case of any other

advertisement, the warning statement

shall appear in the same language as

that principally used in the

advertisement.3