alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014159EN.01003902.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 9 April 2014 — Colart and Others v Parliament

(Case F-87/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Staff representation - Framework agreement between the Parliament and the professional or trade union organisations of the institution - Executive Committee of a trade union - Dispute within the trade union as to the lawfulness and identity of the persons forming the Executive Committee - Rights of access to the email account put at the disposal of the trade union by the institution - Refusal of the institution to re-establish rights and/or to remove all rights of access to the email account - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 159/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Philippe Colart and Others (Bastogne, Belgium) (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and M. Ecker, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the European Parliament relating to the new distribution of rights of access to the mailbox of the SAFE trade union.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Colart, Mr Bras, Mr Corthout, Mr Decoutere, Mr Dony, Mr Garzone, Ms Kemmerling-Linssen, Mr Manzella and Mr Vienne are to bear their own costs and are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Colart, Mr Bras, Mr Corthout, Mr Decoutere, Mr Dony, Mr Garzone, Ms Kemmerling-Linssen, Mr Manzella and Mr Vienne are to bear their own costs and are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23/11/2013, p. 69

1

---
# C_2015155EN.01003701.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/37

---

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)

(Case T-594/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/44)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2742 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2742

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2019

 Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Budd, Mr. Steube, Mr. 
   Bilirakis, Mr. Buck, Mr. Gosar, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
 Gibbs, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Latta, Mr. 
    Green of Tennessee, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Joyce of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Norman, and Mr. Abraham) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. AMOUNTS PAID FOR ABORTION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              DEDUCTION FOR MEDICAL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Amounts Paid for Abortion Not Taken Into Account.--An amount 
paid during the taxable year for an abortion shall not be taken into 
account under subsection (a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-249.

#### David Cwik, as Successor Independent Administrator of the Estate of Genowefa Bogdanowicz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., Petitioners v. Alexi Giannoulias, Illinois State Treasurer, et al.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 476,

178 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8116.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.

*291Same case below, 237 Ill. 2d 409, 341 Ill. Dec. 476, 930 N.E.2d 990.
No. 10-6391.

#### Alfred McMullan, Jr., Petitioner v. Don Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center.

562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 602,

178 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8838.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 849.
#### In the Matter of Kenneth C. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gertrude B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kamora C. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gertrude B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Janiyah B.K. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gertrude B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[48 NYS3d 749]

*800Appeal by the mother from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Caren Loguercio, J.), dated March 4, 2016. The order, made after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, found that the mother neglected the subject children. The notice of appeal from an order of fact-finding also dated March 4, 2016, is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition *(see*CPLR 5512 [a]).

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [B]; 1046 [a] [iii]; [b] [i]; *Matter of Audrey K. [Erik K.],*108 AD3d 717 [2013]). Contrary to the mother’s contention, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing of her repeated misuse of drugs and alcohol, her repeated positive drug tests for marijuana and cocaine, and her failure to regularly attend a substance abuse treatment program established a prima facie case of neglect *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]). Therefore, neither actual impairment of the children’s physical, mental, or emotional condition, nor specific risk of impairment, needed to be established *(see Matter of Audrey K. [Erik K.],*108 AD3d 717 [2013]; *Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.],*81 AD3d 647 [2011]). Accordingly, the court properly found that the mother neglected the children.

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.1


 


2004 Salaried
Employee Performance Incentive Award Program


 


The 2004 Salaried Employee performance
Incentive Award Program is available to all salaried employees.  Under the program, an individual’s bonus is
determined based on a combination of company performance and individual
performance.


 


The portion attributable to the company’s
performance is determined quarterly for each participant based on target levels
of revenue growth and EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)
performance.  The quarterly targets for
revenue growth and EBIT are set at the beginning of the plan year and are the
same for all participants.  If either
revenue growth or EBIT does not exceed a minimum level, no bonus will be
awarded under the program.  The bonus
amounts based on company performance are paid after the end of the quarter.


 


An additional 50% of the quarterly amounts
paid to each participant based on company performance for the first and second
half of the year also establish the “target individual bonus” that may be
earned based on individual performance. 
Individual performance is assessed at mid-year and again at year end,
and each participant is assigned an overall individual performance score.  Each individual performance score corresponds
to a predetermined percentage (ranging from 0% to 180%) of the target
individual bonus that will be awarded to the individual.  The bonus amounts based on individual
performance are paid semiannually.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Rajeev MadhavanRajeev Madhavan Chief Executive Officer August 14, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Com. v. Wagner

10/13/2015

594 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 118 A.3d 457
# C_2015155EN.01002301.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Apple and Pear Australia and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM — Carolus C. (English pink)

(Case T-378/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark English pink - Earlier Community word mark PINK LADY and earlier Community figurative mark Pink Lady - Obligation to state reasons - Duty of diligence - Decisions by a Community trade mark court - No res judicata))

(2015/C 155/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Apple and Pear Australia Ltd (Victoria, Australia) and Star Fruits Diffusion (Caderousse, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Carolus C. BVBA (Nieuwerkerken, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 May 2013 (Case R 1215/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion, on the one hand, and Carolus C. BVBA, on the other.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 29 May 2013 (Case R 1215/2011-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 29 May 2013 (Case R 1215/2011-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and by Star Fruits Diffusion; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and by Star Fruits Diffusion;

| 4. | Orders Apple and Pear Australia and Star Fruits Diffusion to bear half of their costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Apple and Pear Australia and Star Fruits Diffusion to bear half of their costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
# C_2014409EN.01006502.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/65

---

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — AEMN v Parliament

(Case T-678/13) (1)

1

2014/C 409/87

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,330
<INVENTORY>                                     16,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,138
<PP&E>                                          38,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,401
<BONDS>                                        207,845
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           44,843
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                   (192,376)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,225
<SALES>                                         50,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,701
<CGS>                                           33,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (461)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 12,398
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,350
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Sliman assumes command of DLA Distribution Europe

/ Published June 29, 2016
GERMERSHEIM, Germany, 

United States Army Col. Zorn T. Sliman assumed command of DLA Distribution Europe in Germersheim, Germany in a June 29 ceremony officiated by DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi.   

Sliman, who took the reins from previous commander Lt. Col. Krista Hoffman, was previously stationed at the United States Army War College. 

He was commissioned in 1990 through the Reserve Officer Training Corps program of Salisbury State University in Maryland. He entered active duty as a transportation officer and has served in a variety of logistics-oriented command and staff positions.    

Sliman has served in the following command and staff assignments: platoon leader, 62d Transportation Company; operations officer, 70th Ordnance Battalion, Fort Bliss, Texas; movement control officer, 1st Armored Division DISCOM; commander, Bravo Company, 123d Main Support Battalion, Dexheim, Germany; observer controller, 1-311 Infantry Regiment, Richmond, Va.; operations officer, S-4, 43d Area Support Group; division transportation officer, 7th Infantry Division; support operations officer and executive officer, 2d Brigade Support Battalion, Fort Carson, Colo.; strategic sealift officer, Military Sealift Command, Washington, D.C.; commander, Special Troops Battalion, 501st Sustainment Brigade, Camp Carroll, Korea; logistics officer, Joint Staff J4, Washington, D.C.  

Sliman is a graduate of the United States Army War College, Joint Professional Military Education II, the Command and General Staff College, the Logistics Executive Development Course, the Combined Logistics Officer Advanced Course and the Transportation Officer Basic Course.  His civilian education includes a Master of Science in Logistics Management from the Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of Science in Business Management from Salisbury State University.

His awards and decorations include the Bronze Star Medal (two awards), the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Meritorious Service Medal (three awards), the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal and the Combat Action Badge.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35237-35238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


The National Center for Infectious Diseases (NCID), Hepatitis 
Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 
Announces the Following Meeting

    Name: Consultants Meeting on the Prevention and Control of 
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection.
    Times and Dates: 6 p.m.-9:30 p.m., July 15, 1998. 8 a.m.-5 p.m., 
July 16, 1998. 8 a.m.-12 p.m., July 17, 1998.
    Place: Atlanta Marriott Marquis Hotel, 265 Peachtree Center 
Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
Registration is required.
    Purpose: The purpose of this working meeting is to review and 
discuss draft recommendations that will serve as a resource to 
individuals and organizations involved in evaluating persons for HCV 
infection, and are based on currently available knowledge.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Participants will discuss 
recommendations for identifying persons at risk for HCV infection 
and the appropriate counseling and testing of these persons. 
Participants will also discuss recommendations to guide appropriate 
medical referral of HCV infected persons. The agenda will include an 
overview of HCV public health strategies; and sessions on (a) 
screening; (b) counseling and referral; and (c) implementation.
    The participants will include representatives from public, 
private, voluntary and non-governmental organizations.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Written comments are welcome and should be received by the 
contact person listed below prior to the opening of the meeting.

[[Page 35238]]

    Contact Person for More Information: Wesley Hodgson, Hepatitis 
Branch, NCID, CDC, M/S G-37, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 
30333, telephone 404/639-3048, fax 404/639-1538, e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8dfd0c091e8cbcccb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b5c5343126b484f48054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-17203 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Katherine N. Deason, *Appellant,*vs. Moses Kreiger and Industrial Service Corporation, a Florida corporation, *Appellees.*

145 So. 187.

Division B.

Opinion filed December 29, 1932.

*Ruff & Ready,*for Appellant;

*Myer & Lipton,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Deason vs. Deitz, recently considered by us. Part of the same transaction is involved in this case, that was considered by us in the ease 'just referred to.

The appellee, Moses Kreiger, filed his bill to foreclose a purchase money mortgage against the appellant, Katherine N. Deason. The mortgage had been assigned to him by the appellee, Industrial Service Corporation. The defendant filed an answer containing a claim for affirmative relief, averring that she had been fraudulently induced to enter into the bargain which had caused her to make a cash payment and execute the notes and mortgage in suit. Upon the basis of the facts set up in her answer, defendant asked affirmative relief by way of rescission of the notes and mortgage and return of her down payment. The court struck the answer as insufficient in law on the facts alleged, and refused to permit an amended answer of like import, to be filed. These rulings constitute the basis for this appeal and they should be affirmed on authority of Stokes vs. Victory Land Co., 99 Fla. 795, 128 Sou. Rep. 408, and similar cases; also Davidson vs. Davis, 59 Fla. 476, 52 Sou. Rep. 139, as to the claim of usury.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

*487Buford, C.J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Filed under Rule 21 A.