alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33651-33652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16397]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5492-9]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations: Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared June 1, 1998 Through June 5, 
1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), Under Section 
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

[[Page 33652]]

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
    Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office 
of Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1998 (63 
FR 17856).

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-MMS-L02026-AK, Beaufort Sea Planning Area Outer 
Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sale 170 (1997) Lease Offering, 
Offshore Marine, Beaufort Sea Coastal Plain, North Slope Borough of 
Alaska.
    Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No 
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
    ERP No. F-UAF-A11074-00, Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) 
Program, Development, Operation and Deployment, Proposed Launch 
Locations are Cape Canaveral Air Station (AS), Florida and Vandenberg 
Air Force Base (AFB), California, Federal Permits and Licenses, FL and 
CA.
    Summary: EPA stated that the Air Force adequately addressed earlier 
concerns and has no further comment.
    ERP No. F-UAF-L11013-ID, Idaho Enhanced Training Project, Training 
for the 366th Wing at Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), Approval for 
Rights-of-Way Permit by (BLM) and Airspace Modifications by (FAA), 
Owyhee County, ID.
    Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No 
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
    ERP No. FS-APH-A82124-00, Logs, Lumber and Other Unmanufactured 
Wood Articles Importation, Improvements to the existing system to 
Prohibit Introduction of Plant Pests into the United States.
    Summary: EPA continued to have environmental objections to the 
proposed project. Issues of concern included the efficacy of 
combinations of control methods, compliance by exporting countries, 
human health effects of eradication and control efforts, comparison of 
the alternatives, and the use of methyl bromide.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
B. Katherine Biggs,
Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 98-16397 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
No. 10-7202.

#### Clint Walker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1075, 131 S. Ct. 677,

178 L. Ed. 2d 503,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9169.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 728.
Exhibit
      32








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee, Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      June 17, 2007


/S/Hyung
      Soon Lee


Principal
      Executive Officer


Principal
      Financial Officer
# C_2013352EN.01001801.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/18

---

Action brought on 23 September 2013 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL)

(Case T-514/13)

2013/C 352/34

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AgriCapital Corp. (New York, United States) (represented by: P. Meyer and M. Gramsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: agri.capital GmbH (Münster, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2013 given in Case R 2236/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2013 given in Case R 2236/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs of proceedings, as well as those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs of proceedings, as well as those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘AGRI.CAPITAL’ for goods and services in Classes 4, 7, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 8 341 323

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 6 192 322 for the word mark ‘AgriCapital’ for services in Class 36 and Community trade mark registration No 4 589 339 for the word mark ‘AGRICAPITAL’ for services in Class 36

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2013207EN.01005302.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/53

---

Action brought on 30 May 2013 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-295/13)

2013/C 207/88

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, lawyer, G. Palmieri, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/177/10, corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/178/10 and corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/179/10, published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 82 A, of 21 March 2013. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/177/10, corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/178/10 and corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/179/10, published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 82 A, of 21 March 2013.

| — | As a consequence, annul the corrected notices. |
| --- | --- |

—

As a consequence, annul the corrected notices.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and principal arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-275/13, Italian Republic v Commission.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17145]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 54

[Docket No. 93N-0445]


Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators; Correction

Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

Action: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of February 2, 1998 (63 FR 
5233). The document issued regulations requiring the sponsor of any 
drug, including a biological product, or device marketing application 
(applicant), to submit certain information covering the compensation 
to, and financial interests of, any clinical investigator conducting 
certain clinical studies. The document was published with an error. 
This document corrects that error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary C. Gross, Office of External 
Affairs, Food and Drug Administration (HF-60), 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-3440, FAX 301-594-0113.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 98-2407 appearing on page 5233 in 
the Federal Register of February 2, 1998, the following correction is 
made:


Sec. 54.4   [Corrected]

    On page 5251, in the first column, in Sec. 54.4 Certification and 
disclosure requirements, paragraph (a), line 3, ``519(k)'' is corrected 
to read ``510(k)''.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-17145 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 10-7373.

#### Terrance Bivings, Petitioner v. Ray Lawler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 939,

178 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 604.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Charles M.R. Hutchinson, Deceased. Herbert E. Nass et al., as Temporary Coadministrators of the Estate of Charles M.R. Hutchinson, Deceased, Respondents; Marion Kaselle, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 838]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, S.), entered September 25, 2002, which granted petitioners’ application to modify the temporary letters of administration.

*1256Respondent asserts numerous procedural errors by petitioners in bringing this matter before Surrogate’s Court, including, among others, failure to follow the statutory procedures for commencing a special proceeding, failure to pay the mandated filing fee and failure to adhere to the terms of the order appointing petitioners as temporary coadministrators of decedent’s estate. Petitioners have informed this Court that they are not opposing respondent’s appeal, but are instead recommencing the matter as a formal petition in compliance with the governing statutes. Since respondent’s appeal is unopposed and the preserved arguments are meritorious, the order must be reversed, without prejudice to a properly commenced proceeding.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16979]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Establishment of the Information Security Policy Advisory Council

    This notice is published to announce the establishment of the 
Information Security Policy Advisory Council (ISPAC). The ISPAC will 
advise the President, the Assistant to the President for National 
Security Affairs, the Archivist of the United States, and such other 
executive branch official as it deems appropriate, on policies 
established under Executive Order 12958 or its implementing directives, 
including recommended changes to those policies. The ISPAC shall also 
provide recommendations to agency heads for specific subject areas for 
systematic declassification review and serve as a forum to discuss 
policy issues in dispute.
    If you have any questions regarding the establishment of the ISPAC, 
please contact Mary Ann Hadyka, NARA's Committee Management Officer, at 
(301) 713-7360 x222.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
John W. Carlin,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 98-16979 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|Date: February 9, 2005 |  | By:  /s/ Christopher G. Kenber
Name:  Christopher G. KenberTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# July/August issue of Loglines magazine now available

/ Published July 14, 2016
The July/August issue of Loglines magazine explores a range of topics from across DLA. Included in this issue:- “A Proper Fit” highlights the resourcefulness of DLA Land & Maritime, who devised a way to come up with a needed part that was in short supply.
- “Synchronizing the Effort” describes the work of DLA’s Joint Logistics Operations Center.
- “Factory to Foxhole” looks at how DLA works with USTRANSCOM to serve the warfighter.
- “Keep Them Flying” discusses how DLA Aviation supports several long-serving but crucial military aircraft.
- “Logistics Live and On Location” explains how DLA’s expeditionary logistics teams stay ready to deplore worldwide to support contingency operations.
This issue also features Police Chief Chuepheng Lo, the nation’s first police chief of Hmong descent, who came to the United States as a refugee; the latest on DLA’s use of bio-based engine oils; a look at the Warfighter Support Initiative; and a conversation with the outgoing chief of DLA-USTRANSCOM Division.Printed copies of Loglines are available throughout DLA’s locations and can be printed from the online PDF. To subscribe to Loglines, email loglines@dla.mil.
No. 10-6600.

#### Yolonda T. Strong, Petitioner v. New York City Department of Education.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 652,

178 L. Ed. 2d 490,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9286,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 62 App. Div. 3d 592, 880 N.Y.S.2d 39.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Yuan Gang, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Junlian Integrated Surveillance, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: August 14, 2007 /s/ Yuan Gang Yuan Gang, Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015155EN.01002401.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Sea Handling v Commission

(Case T-456/13) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Obligation to carry out a concrete and individual examination - Overriding public interest - Partial access))

(2015/C 155/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sea Handling SpA (Somma Lombardo, Italy) (represented initially by B. Nascimbene and M. Merola, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by D. Grespan and C. Zadra, and subsequently by D. Grespan and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 June 2013 refusing to grant Sea Handling access to documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sea Handling SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sea Handling SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 12.10.2013.

1

---
No. 10A243.

#### Mark Green, Applicant v. United States.

562 U.S. 1131, 131 S. Ct. 974,

178 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 311.

January 10, 2011.

Application for bail, addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court, denied.
No. 10-6576.

#### Karl E. White, Petitioner v. G. Michael Green, et al.

562 U.S. 1059, 131 S. Ct. 685,

178 L. Ed. 2d 474,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9172.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 199.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|Certification of Richard A.
Mansfield  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|I, Richard A.
Mansfield, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.,
hereby certify, in  accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1,  2004, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K  for the year ended February 1,
2004, which accompanies this  certification, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | By: | /s/ Richard A. Mansfield Richard A. Mansfield Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  April 30, 2004
|----------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---