alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA has submitted the following revised information 
collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public. It was originally published on January 15, 
1998. No comments relating to the information collection were received.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until July 31, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
NCUA Clearance Officer or OMB Reviewer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. James L. Baylen (703) 518-6411, National 
Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 
22314-3428, Fax No. 703-518-6433, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff959d9e86939a91bf919c8a9ed1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bad0d8dbc3d6dfd4fad4d9cfdb94ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the information collection 
requests, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by 
calling the NCUA Clearance Officer, James L. Baylen, (703) 518-6411.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    OMB Number: 3133-0067.
    Form Number: NCUA 5310.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Corporate Credit Union Monthly Call Report.
    Description:  NCUA utilizes the information to monitor financial 
conditions in corporate credit unions and to allocate supervision and 
examination resources. The respondents are corporate credit unions or 
``banker's banks'' for natural person credit unions.
    Respondents: All corporate credit unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 40.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1.44 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Monthly.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 960.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: N/A.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on May 11, 
1998.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17407 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         EDO CORPORATION'S SUBSIDIARIES

                               ACTIVE SUBSIDARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          STATE OR COUNTRY OF                   NAMES UNDER WHICH
    SUBSIDIARY                              INCORPORATION OR                SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS
                                              ORGANIZATION
<S>                                           <C>                           <C>
Darlington Inc.                               Delaware                      Darlington of Virginia, Inc.

EDO Artisan Inc.                              New Jersey

EDO Communications and Countermeasures        California
Systems Inc.

EVI Technology, LLC                           Delaware                      EDO EVI

EDO MBM Technology Limited                    United Kingdom

EDO MTech Inc.                                Pennsylvania                  EDO M. Tech

EDO Professional Services Inc.                Virginia                      Advanced Engineering & Research
                                                                            Associates Which Will Do Business In
                                                                            California As Virginia AERA, Inc
                                                                            AERA Incorporated
                                                                            AERA, Inc.

EDO Reconnaissance and Surveillance           Delaware                      EDO Communications and
Systems, Inc.                                                               Countermeasures Systems

EDO Rugged Systems Limited                    United Kingdom

EDO (UK) Limited                              United Kingdom

EDO Western Corporation                       Utah                          EDO Electro-Ceramic Products

Fiber Innovations, Inc.                       Massachusetts

NexGen Communications LLC                     Virginia

Specialty Plastics, Inc.                      Louisiana                     EDO Specialty Plastics
</TABLE>
# C_2014024EN.01000301.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vergabekammer Arnsberg (Germany) lodged on 22 October 2013 — Bundesdruckerei GmbH v Stadt Dortmund

(Case C-549/13)

2014/C 24/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Vergabekammer Arnsberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesdruckerei GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadt Dortmund

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 56 TFEU and Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC (1) preclude national legislation and/or a procurement condition of a public contracting authority according to which a tenderer who wants to obtain a or the advertised public contract must (1) undertake to pay the staff appointed to carry out the contract a standard or minimum wage fixed in the legislation, and (2) impose the same obligation on an appointed or prospective subcontractor and submit a corresponding undertaking of the subcontractor to the contracting authority, where (a) the legislation provides for such an obligation only for the procurement of public contracts but not also for the award of private contracts, and (b) the subcontractor is resident in another EU Member State and the employees of the subcontractor carry out the services covered by the contract exclusively in the subcontractor’s home country?

1

---

(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).

1

---
No. 10-6726.

#### Christopher Lee Prosser, Petitioner v. Laurain C. Hendricks, et al.

562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 610,

178 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8947.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 710.
EXHIBIT 21.1
   Parent Level:
    
    Dex One Corporation (f/k/a R.H. Donnelley Corporation, f/k/a Dun & Bradstreet
Corporation), a Delaware corporation; traded on the New York Stock Exchange as DEXO
 Tier 1 Subsidiaries:
    
    R.H. Donnelley Inc.(formerly known as The Reuben H. Donnelley
Corporation), a Delaware corporation wholly owned by Dex One Corporation. R.H.
Donnelley Inc. is registered to do business as Dex.Dex Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation wholly owned by Dex One
Corporation. (formerly known as Forward Acquisition Corp., formed
September 30, 2005 and established to merge with and survive Dex
Media, Inc. on January 31, 2006, the public holding company formerly
traded on NYSE as DEX). Dex Media, Inc. is registered to do
business as Dex.Business.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation wholly owned by Dex One
CorporationDex One Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation wholly owned by Dex One
CorporationR.H. Donnelley Corporation, a Delaware corporation wholly owned by
Dex One Corporation
 Tier 2 Subsidiary (100% wholly owned by R.H. Donnelley Inc.):R.H. Donnelley APIL, Inc., a Delaware corporationTier 2 Subsidiaries (each 100% owned by Dex Media, Inc.):Dex Media East, Inc., a Delaware corporationDex Media West, Inc., a Delaware corporationTier 3 Subsidiary
 Dex Media Service LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (owned 49% by each of Dex Media East, Inc. and Dex Media West, Inc. and 2% by Dex Media. Inc.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2364

ALICE M. BRYANT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00012-MOC)

Submitted: May 28, 2014 Decided: June 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlotte W. Hall, CHARLES T. HALL LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Hugh Dun 

Rappaport, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, 

Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alice Bryant appeals the district court’s order 

upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Bryant’s applications for 

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Bryant v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-00012-MOC (W.D.N.C. 

Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015279EN.01001101.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v D.G. Kieback

(Case C-9/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Tax legislation - Income tax - Income received in a Member State - Non-resident worker - Tax in the State of employment - Conditions))

(2015/C 279/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: D.G. Kieback

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39(2) EC must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State, for the purposes of charging income tax on a non-resident worker who has pursued his occupational activity in that Member State during part of the year, from refusing to grant that worker a tax advantage which takes account of his personal and family circumstances, on the basis that, although he received, in that Member State, all or almost all his income from that period, that income does not form the major part of his taxable income for the entire year in question. The fact that that worker left to pursue his occupational activity in a non-member State and not in another EU Member State does not affect that interpretation.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,581 & 581A]


Pro-Line Cap Company, et al.; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 17, 1997, applicable 
to all workers of Pro-Line Cap Company, Bowie, Texas. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on December 10, 1997 (62 FR 65100).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
from the company shows that worker separations occurred at Pro-Line's 
two Fort Worth, Texas locations: (1) White Settlement Road, 
headquarters office, accounts and customer service and (2) Jennings 
Avenue location, embrodiery and warehousing. The entire company closed 
February 3, 1998. The workers produced athletic headwear (officially 
licensed, National Football League, National Hockey League and Major 
League Baseball caps).
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Pro-Line Cap Company who were adversely affected by 
increased imports.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of Pro-Line Cap Company, also known as Star Point 
Enterprise, Incorporated, also known as Caryle Golf, Incorporated 
location on White Settlement Road; and Jennings Avenue in Fort Worth, 
Texas.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33, 581 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Pro-Line Cap Company, also known as Star Point 
Enterprises, Incorporated, also known as Carlye Golf, Incorporated, 
Bowie, Texas (TA-W-33,581), 8224 White Settlement Road, and 512 
Jennings Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas (TA-W-33,581A) who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after May 9, 1996 
through November 17, 1999 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 22nd day of June, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-17639 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 10-274.

#### Gillian B. Loya, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ricardo D. Loya, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1062, 131 S. Ct. 645,

178 L. Ed. 2d 479,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9124.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 656.
# C_2014223EN.01006801.xml

| 14.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/68

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2014 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-60/13) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Registration of absences on account of sickness - Irregular absence - Deduction made by the Appointing Authority from annual leave - Application made by e-mail - Knowledge of the person concerned that a decision existed - Failure to open an e-mail and to investigate, by clicking on a hyperlink, the content of that decision - Admissibility - Time-limits - Determination of the date at which the person involved could become aware of the content of the decision))

2014/C 223/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision to reject the request, made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations, for adjustment of the entries in respect of the applicant’s absences on account of sickness in the SysPer2 application.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Lebedef shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Lebedef shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 29.

1

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      February 17,
      2011
              /s/ Mark T. FrostName:
      Mark T. FrostTitle:
      Senior Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer
No. 10-7213.

#### Connell Spain, Petitioner v. Texas Medical Board Disciplinary Committee.

562 U.S. 1105, 131 S. Ct. 850,

178 L. Ed. 2d 552,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9665.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Syphilis is an infection mothers 

can pass to their unborn 

babies. It can make babies 

very sick, cause them to have 

ongoing health issues, and in 

some cases can lead to death. 

Get Tested 

for Syphilis

Syphilis can be cured 

with the right medicine. 

It’s best to get tested 

for syphilis 3 times

during your pregnancy.

If it is not treated, 

syphilis can pass from 

mother to baby. 

This is called 

congenital syphilis.

Get tested for 

syphilis today.

If you’re pregnant, get tested 

for syphilis as soon as possible.

Visit https://gettested.cdc.gov/ 

or contact your 

local health department:
Without medicine, 

congenital syphilis can cause:

• A baby to be born early 

or small 

• A baby to have lifelong 

health problems

• Miscarriage, stillbirth, 

or newborn death

Get Tested

as Soon as Possible

Quick Treatment

Can Protect Your Baby

You may not know you have syphilis. 

Anyone who has sex can get syphilis. Many people with 

syphilis do not have any symptoms. The only way to 

know is to get tested.

If you have syphilis, you need to be treated 

right away.

1. At your first doctor’s visit or as soon 

as possible during pregnancy 

• Even if you’ve been tested for syphilis in 

the past, you should be tested when you 

become pregnant.

• If you have syphilis, your sex partners 

need to be tested and treated too, or 

you might get it again.

2. During your third trimester 

(or 3 months before your due date) 

• It is possible to get syphilis later in 

pregnancy or again, so you should 

get tested a second time when you’re 

around 28 weeks pregnant.

3. At the hospital when you have 

your baby

• It is possible to get syphilis later in 

pregnancy or again, so testing at 

delivery is very important.

You should get tested 3 times during 

your pregnancy:

To make sure 

your baby 

does not get 

syphilis, it is 

important 

to get your 

medicine 

as soon as 

possible. 

The 

consequence 

of untreated 

congenital 

syphilis is 

too high.

1

2

3

Let your doctor or nurse know if you can’t 

get your medicine for any reason. They will 

work to get you the medicine you need to 

stay healthy and protect your baby.

If you miss appointments, your medicine 

might not work as well. 

Sometimes, medicine can be given one time 

right when you find out you have syphilis.

Sometimes, you may have to go to a different 

doctor to get your medicine or come back 

for more doses.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ C. Stanley Bailey

C. Stanley BaileyChief Executive Officer