alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33431-33432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16145]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements: Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following collection of information was published on 
March 9, 1998, [63 FR 11472].

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Street, ABC-100; Federal 
Aviation Administration; 800 Independence Avenue, SW.;

[[Page 33432]]

Washington, DC 20591; Telephone number (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Physiological Training.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0101.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Form(s): AC Form 3150-7.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Abstract: This collection of information is used to determine if 
the applicants meet the qualifications for the voluntary physiological 
training under the FAA/USAF training agreement.
    Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 458 hours.
    Addressee: Send comments to the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725--17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 
days of publication.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on June 12, 1998.
Phillip A. Leach,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 98-16145 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
# C_2015429EN.01002903.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/29

---

Order of the General Court of 28 October 2015 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-260/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 429/39)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
Cite as 2014 Ark. 190



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

I N R E S U P R E M E C O U R T COMMITTEE ON MODEL JURY INSTRUCTIONS–CIVIL Opinion Delivered APRIL 24, 2014

PER CURIAM Sean T. Keith, Esq., of Rogers, is appointed to the Supreme Court Committee on Model Jury Instructions–Civil for a three-year term, effective immediately, to expire on September 30, 2017. The court thanks Mr. Keith for his willingness to serve on this important committee. Timothy L. Brooks, Esq., has resigned from the committee after accepting appointment as a federal judge to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Judge Brooks has served on the committee since July 27, 2011. The court expresses its sincere appreciation to Judge Brooks for his service to this committee.
2016-1777.

#### State v. K.W.

Warren App. No. CA2016-01-004, 2016-Ohio-7365.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP91-229-027, RP92-166-020]


Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

June 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 18, 1998, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing its Refund Report pursuant to 
the Commission's Order on Rehearing dated June 3, 1998 (June 3, 1998 
Order).
    Panhandle states that concurrently with the filing of this report 
it made a refund to Omega Gas PipeLine Company, OPC Gas Company, Vesta 
Energy Company, d.b.a. Edisto Resources Inc., d.b.a. Forcenergy, Inc., 
pursuant to Ordering Paragraph (B) of the June 3, 1998 Order, related 
to the pre-restructuring rate periods in this proceeding.
    Panhandle states that it also submitted schedules setting forth the 
calculation of the refund due Forecenergy, Inc. including additional 
carrying charges and the amount of refunds used to offset amounts due 
Panhandle.
    Panhandle further states that a copy of this filing is being served 
on all parties to this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 29, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17035 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4208]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.

Time and Place:  Friday, March 12, 2010 beginning at 2:30 p.m. The 
meeting will be held in the Palladian Room at the Onmi Shoreham Hotel, 
2500 Calvert Street, NW., Washington, DC 20008.
    Agenda: Agenda items include a briefing on the status of the 2010 
Advisory Committee's Subcommittees and the challenges for 2010.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes 
auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special 
accommodations, please contact, prior to March 3, 2010, Susan Houser, 
Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 
565-3232 or TDD (202) 565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Susan 
Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 
565-3232.

Jonathan Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4208 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
```
No. 10-7511.

#### Henry Lee Monday, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1154, 131 S. Ct. 946,

178 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 600.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 983.
#### In the Matter of Nicholas Amatulli, Petitioner, v William J. Bratton et al., Respondents.

[65 NYS3d 702]

Determination of respondents, dated September 18, 2015, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of accessing, downloading, and possessing child pornography, and terminated his employment as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order, Supreme Court, New York County [Barbara Jaffee, J.], entered June 2, 2016), dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner was guilty of downloading and possessing child pornography is supported by substantial evidence (see *generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). As for the downloading specification, respondents showed that 148 child pornography files were shared and downloaded to petitioner’s IP address between January 26, 2013 and March 31, 2013. The dates on which these files were detected corresponded to dates on which petitioner had taken leave or a day off from work. As for the possession of child pornography specification, respondents established that the WD external hard drive found in petitioner’s basement contained at least five nondeleted, graphic, child pornography videos in a “hidden” folder. Petitioner’s behavior during the execution of the search warrant, during which he was found locked in the basement where he was allegedly filing comic books, and told officers there was no tower computer in the basement, even though one was later found there, provided circumstantial evidence of his guilt as to both charges *(see Matter of S & R Lake Lounge v New York State Liq. Auth.,*87 NY2d 206, 209 [1995]). The Hearing Officer was entitled to take petitioner’s demeanor during his *560testimony into account when assessing his credibility *(see e.g. Matter of Edwards v Safir,*282 AD2d 287 [1st Dept 2001]).

Despite petitioner’s tenure with the police department since 1999, the absence of any formal disciplinary record, and the fact that he had been awarded several medals, his termination for downloading and possessing child pornography does not shock our sense of fairness *(see e.g. Matter of Taylor v New York State Div. of State Police,*28 AD3d 978 [3d Dept 2006]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL160-1b; AD-FRL-5951-7]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USEPA proposes to approve a variance allowing a temporary 
increase in particulate matter emissions from the Marathon Oil refinery 
in Robinson, Illinois, to allow deferral of repairs of control 
equipment until the time of a scheduled maintenance period. In the 
Final Rules section of this Federal Register, USEPA is fully approving 
the State Implementation Plan revision as a direct final rule without 
prior proposal, because the USEPA views this as a noncontroversial 
revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for 
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse 
written comments are received in response to these actions, no further 
activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If USEPA 
receives adverse written comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on this proposed rule. Any parties interested in 
commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 25, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    A copy of the State submittal is available for inspection at: 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John Summerhays, at (312) 886-6067.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 8, 1998.
Michelle D. Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
[FR Doc. 98-1764 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60623

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN DEL CASTILLO-BARRON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Martin Del Castillo-Barron was convicted of illegal reentry of a 

previously deported aggravated felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(2) and

(b)(2). He was found in the United States during the course of a traffic stop 

when a police officer learned that occupants of the stopped vehicle, including 

Del Castillo-Barron, were not United States citizens and possessed no 

documents authorizing their presence in the country.

On appeal, Del Castillo-Barron argues that the district court erred in 

denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following the traffic stop. In 

support of his argument, Del Castillo-Barron contends that the officer 

conducting the stop exceeded his jurisdiction under Mississippi state law 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 5, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60623 Document: 00513452566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2016
No. 15-60623

2

because the stop occurred at a location where the officer lacked authority to 

act.

The relevant question is whether the officer, in conducting the traffic 

stop, violated the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Walker, 960 F.2d 

409, 415 (5th Cir. 1992). Issues regarding local law-enforcement jurisdiction 

do not govern in a federal criminal action. Id.; United States v. HernandezAcuna, 202 F. App’x 736, 744 (5th Cir. 2006). Del Castillo-Barron does not 

challenge the district court’s finding that the traffic stop conformed with the 

standard set forth in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The district court, 

therefore, properly denied the motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-60623 Document: 00513452566 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | BY: /s/ Christopher G. Kenber
Name:  Christopher G. KenberTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Keller,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Robert J. KellerRobert
      J. KellerChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      5, 2010
No. 10-7061.

#### Darryl Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 621,

178 L. Ed. 2d 450,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8939.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 918.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 27, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. CNY Financial Corporation, Cortland, New York; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Cortland Savings Bank, Cortland, New York.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 25, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-17455 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# C_2014078EN.01001201.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/12

---

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2014 — EPAW v Commission

(Case T-168/13) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Legal person governed by private law - Absence of proof of existence in law - Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) (represented by: C. Kiss, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by K. Herrmann and P. Oliver, and subsequently by L. Pignatoro Nolin, K. Herrmann and J. Tomkin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Communication of 6 June 2012 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, entitled ‘Renewable Energy: a major player in the European energy market’, and of the Commission’s decision of 21 January 2013 rejecting as inadmissible the request made by the applicant for review by the Commission of that communication.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6189.

#### Ralph John Prepetit, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 854,

178 L. Ed. 2d 585,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9604.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1011, 131 S. Ct. 523, 178 L. Ed. 2d 386, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8604.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2652 

To require the use of voting machines manufactured in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. POCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require the use of voting machines manufactured in the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure American-Made 

5 Voting Machines Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF VOTING MACHINES MANUFACTURED IN THE 

7 UNITED STATES. 

8 Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 

9 (52 U.S.C. 21081(a)) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2652 IH

1 ‘‘(7) VOTING MACHINE REQUIREMENTS.—By 

2 not later than the date of the regularly scheduled 

3 general election for Federal office occurring in No4 vember 2022, each State shall seek to ensure that 

5 any voting machine used in such election and in any 

6 subsequent election for Federal office is manufac7 tured in the United States.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1*














Section
1350 Certification





I, Bernard C. Bailey, the interim chief
executive officer of LaserCard Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to my knowledge:





(i)           the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31,
2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(ii)           
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
            June
      6, 2008/s/Bernard C. BaileyBernard
      C. Bailey





*The
material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.