alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Bruce C. Dale                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       of                            Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.

I,
Bruce C. Dale, President and Chief Executive Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.,
hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) |  | The
Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29,                   2006,  which
 accompanies this  certification,  fully complies                   with  the
 requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the                   Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) |  | The
 information  contained in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K                   for the year
ended January 29, 2006,  which  accompanies  this                   certification,
 fairly presents, in all material respects, the                   financial condition and
results of operations of Duckwall-ALCO                   Stores, Inc.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: | /s/ Bruce C. Dale                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Bruce
C. Dale                                                               
      President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dated:  April 14, 2006

---
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-108416, 333-103515, and 333-85486 on Form S-3 of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC(formerly Duke Power Company LLC, which was formally Duke Energy Corporation) of our report dated March 14, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of DCP Midstream, LLC as of and for the years endedDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

March 14, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeDistributionOperating StatusOperating Status Details

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# GREEN OPEN

Note: During times of inclement weather or emergencies, DLA Headquarters refers to OPM's status status to determine the DLA headquarters operating status. It can take up to 30 minutes for the DLA homepage to update.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Green Operating Statusgreen
**Exhibit 23.1***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM*We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-44551,33-56289, 33-64317, 333-46615, 333-59790, 333-65822, 333-75539,333-75541, 333-75543, 333-91613) of R.H. DonnelleyCorporation of our report dated March 16, 2005 relating tothe consolidated financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting which appear in this Form 10-K. Wealso consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-44551,33-56289, 33-64317, 333-46615, 333-59790, 333-65822, 333-75539,333-75541, 333-75543, 333-91613) of R.H. DonnelleyCorporation of our reports dated March 16, 2005 relating tothe financial statements of R.H. DonnelleyPublishing & Advertising, Inc., R.H. DonnelleyAPIL, Inc., Dontech II Partnership, R.H. DonnelleyPublishing & Advertising of Illinois Holdings, LLC, andR.H. Donnelley Publishing & Advertising ofIllinois Partnership which appear in this Form 10-K./s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPRaleigh, North CarolinaMarch 16, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jackie Pickett, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 448]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered June 13, 2013, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry of certain jurors to determine whether they were grossly unqualified to serve is unpreserved for appellate review, because the defendant did not object to the sufficiency of the court’s inquiry or request that any further inquiry be made *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hicks,*6 NY3d 737, 739 [2005]). In any event, the defendant’s claim regarding the sufficiency of the court’s inquiry is without merit *(see People v Williams,*127 AD3d 792, 793 [2015]). Additionally, the defendant waived any claim that the court erred in failing to declare a mistrial, or in failing to discharge any of the jurors on the ground of gross disqualification, within the meaning of CPL 270.35 (1) *(see People v Wlasiuk,*90 AD3d 1405, 1410 [2011]; *People v Hinton,*302 AD2d 1008, 1008-1009 [2003]; *cf. People v Prince,*128 AD3d 987, 988 [2015]).

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel improperly permitted him to choose whether to move for a mistrial is without merit. The record supports the conclusion that the defendant’s trial counsel made the decision to forgo moving for a mistrial after consulting with him *(see People v Colville,*20 NY3d 20, 32 [2012]; *People v Butler,*140 AD3d 472, 472-473 [2016]; *People v Gottsche,*118 AD3d 1303, 1304-1305 [2014]). Counsel’s representation, viewed in its totality, cannot be considered ineffective *(see People v Clark, 28*NY3d 556, 562-563 [2016]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Balkin and Barros, JJ., concur.
# Irish American Heritage Month Spotlight: Caitlin Spurling

/ Published March 14, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Irish American Heritage Month is observed annually in March. It is a time to celebrate Irish Americans’ achievements, histories, traditions and cultural diversity. To commemorate this observance, DLA Aviation shines the spotlight on Caitlin Spurling to talk about Irish American heritage.*

**Name:** Caitlin Spurling

**Organization:** Supplier Operations Directorate

**Years of service:** Five years

**What is your job title:** Quality Assurance Specialist

**Describe your job in a sentence or two:** My job is to make sure our contractors have everything they need to be successful, such as materiel requirements, drawings and specifications. When defects are found, I investigate the cause to prevent a reoccurrence.

**How do you support the warfighter?**The warfighter can be assured the materiel they receive is high quality and reliable, because I’ve verified its integrity. I approach my job with acute precision because my decisions directly contribute to the readiness, effectiveness, timeliness and safety of our military personnel relying on the materiel.

**Tell us something unique about your heritage or country of origin.**Something unique about my Irish heritage is the concept of craic, pronounced “crack.” Craic is the way to describe a good time and the way the Irish celebrate life, overcome hardships and take time to enjoy the simple pleasures we tend to overlook in everyday life.

**What is one thing you'd like others to know about your heritage?**What I would like people to know about my Irish American heritage is the strong sense of community passed down through generations. Irish heritage is about forging connections and finding joy in shared experiences.

**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Irish Heritage Month?**Celebrating Irish Heritage Month is important to me because recognizing different heritages fosters a sense of inclusivity and makes everyone feel valued and respected. At DLA Aviation this month, employees will have the opportunity to learn about Irish Heritage Month, Irish history, traditions and our contributions. By sharing cultural knowledge, we raise awareness about the various backgrounds belonging to the people within our workforce, which promotes understanding and appreciation amongst colleagues.
#### The Carlyle, LLC, Appellant, v Beekman Garage LLC et al., Defendants, and Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC, Respondent. Rafael Llopiz et al., Nonparty Respondents.

[67 NYS3d 622]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered January 10, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for use and occupancy against defendant Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC (QP 1633), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered March 6, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion to compel QP 1633 and nonparties Rafael Llopiz, Citizens Icon Holdings, LLC, and Quik Park West 50th Street, LLC, to comply with postjudgment subpoenas, and granted Llopiz and defendants’ cross motion for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment on the cause of action for use and occupancy is precluded by issues of fact as to the nature of the use and occupancy, assuming that QP 1633 occupied the parking garage premises at issue, and whether the repairs undertaken by plaintiff constituted a partial actual eviction of QP 1633 from the premises *(see 81 Franklin Co. v Ginaccini,*160 AD2d 558, 559 [1st Dept 1990]; *Union City Union Suit Co. v*
      *510
      *Miller,*162 AD2d 101, 105 [1st Dept 1990], *lv denied*77 NY2d 804 [1991]). Moreover, in the event it is determined that there was no partial actual eviction, it will be necessary to determine the value of the use and occupancy, which was not included in the assessment of damages for unpaid rent.

Plaintiff’s postjudgment disclosure demands were overly broad (see *Stern v Carlin*Communications, 210 AD2d 110 [1st Dept 1994]; CPLR 5223, 5224). In addition to information related to the judgment debtors’ assets, plaintiff improperly sought information related to the assets and operations of the non-judgment-debtors it subpoenaed.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
*April*7, *2017*

2017-Ohio-1298.]

2017-0079.

#### State ex rel. Delaware Joint Vocational School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Testa.

In Mandamus. On relator’s motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. On relator’s motion to supplement the record. Motion denied.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, O’Neill, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Connor, C.J., and French and Fischer, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion for reconsideration and issue a writ of mandamus.
No. 10-151.

#### Larry Depee, et al., Petitioners v. Sylvia Mahach-Watkins, Individually and as the Successor in Interest to the Estate of John Joseph Wayne Watkins.

562 U.S. 1134, 131 S. Ct. 898,

178 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 294.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 1054.
Exhibit 10.3



Exhibit 10.3 



__________ __, 20___ 



Name
Business Unit



Dear __________: 



On __________ __, 20___, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted you _________ restricted shares
of ITW common stock the market value of which would be the average of the high and low
share price on the grant date. 



The shares are “restricted”
because you may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber them until they
vest and are distributed to you. The restricted shares will vest and be distributed to you
in three annual installments on __________ __, 20___, __________ __, 20___ and __________
__, 20___. If your employment with ITW or any of its subsidiaries terminates prior to
__________ __, 20___ for any reason other than retirement or disability (each as defined
in the Stock Incentive Plan), or death, all unvested restricted shares will be forfeited.
If your employment terminates prior to __________ __, 20___ due to retirement, disability
or death, all unvested restricted shares will fully vest. The Compensation Committee may
forfeit any unvested shares if they determine that you have acted in a manner adversely
affecting ITW. 



You have the right to vote the
restricted shares and to receive dividends commencing with the dividend to be paid to
stockholders on __________ __, 20___. The dividends will be taxable income to you subject
to withholding. You also will recognize taxable income subject to withholding on each date
that the restricted shares vest. Such taxable income will equal the fair market value of
ITW common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of restricted shares that
vest on that date. Alternatively, you may elect to recognize taxable income this year on
all or a portion of the restricted shares by filing an election with the Internal Revenue
Service prior to __________ __, 20___, a very short time period. For more information
concerning this election we also recommend that you consult with your accountant or other
tax advisor. 



Your rights with respect to the
restricted shares are contingent upon your satisfaction of all applicable tax withholding
obligations. The restricted shares are subject to the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan,
as described in the attached Prospectus. 



If you have any questions regarding
this grant contact Robyn McCarthy at 847-657-4225 or Heather Liay at 847-657-4520. 



A Form 4 has been filed by ITW with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to report the grant of the restricted shares. Any sale
by you of the restricted shares after they vest is subject to window period requirements
and timely filing on Form 4. 



Yours sincerely, 



W. James Farrell

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 



Please acknowledge receipt of this
letter by signing and dating both copies of this letter and returning the “CORPORATE
COPY” to the corporate office in the envelope provided as soon as possible. 


Sign:_________________


Date:_________________
No. 10-5985.

#### Geraldine Trice, Petitioner v. Clark County School District, et al.

562 U.S. 985, 131 S. Ct. 422,

178 L. Ed. 2d 329,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8135.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 789.
No. 09-11233.

#### Jackie Lyn Coulombe, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Ventura County, et al.

562 U.S. 1037, 131 S. Ct. 588,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8774.

178 L. Ed. 2d 429,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 166, 178 L. Ed. 2d 97, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6731.
# Editorial: DLA helps DOD meet digital records requirements by June 2024

/ Published June 19, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services - Document Services is helping the Defense Department digitize paper records to meet National Archives and Records Administration requirements by June 2024.

DLA has been scanning and converting paper records for DOD customers for over a decade while continuously increasing its ability to keep up with the influx of customers that has grown since NARA announced the requirement in 2019. DLA currently handles about 40 scanning projects for customers such as the Coast Guard, Joint Pathology Center, Army Corps of Engineers and Defense Technical Information Center.

Technicians can scan and digitize documents of any size, from business cards to large-format engineering drawings. They also scan a wide range of record types including medical files, pathology slides, microfilm, and confidential and secret records. Secure destruction of physical records is available after conversion. 

Document Services ensures customers with permanent records meet NARA’s new digitization regulations that went into effect June 5. The regulations draw from the Federal Agencies Digital Guidelines Initiative’s standards for digitization and allows agencies to use the digital versions for the same business purposes as the source records while ensuring they are properly preserved for the NARA archive. NARA originally said it would stop accepting paper documents in December 2022 but extended the date.

The FADGI  star system rates the qualities of digital images on a scale of one (lowest quality) to four (highest quality). Scanning at the three-star level is ideal for archive material because it captures minute details of photographs and maps in addition to other features such as stamps and watermarks. Three-star images are considered “reproducible masters.” If the original physical document is destroyed, they can serve as an adequate replacement.

Non-permanent records  –  the majority of customer data  –  is scanned and converted to the level desired. DLA representatives help customers through the process and answer questions on FADGI guidelines.

Customers interested in conversion services must complete an assessment form to estimate costs and processing timelines. Factors include document volume and condition, the amount of document preparation required, the level of indexing or metadata needed to retrieve the documents, potential optical recognition services and destruction.

Converting records to digital format has many benefits besides meeting NARA’s requirements:
      - Reduces physical document storage costs
      - Increases efficient information sharing
      - Easier to search and retrieve documents and data due to organizing and indexing with metadata
      - Protects critical information
      - Aids in disaster recovery
      - Improves records management for audit purposes

Visit DLA Document Services for more information or contact the Customer Support Center at 1-866-736-7010 or contact.docsvcs@dla.mil.
No. 10-356.

#### Lloyd Phillip Locke, Petitioner v. Michael Evans, Warden.

562 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 602,

178 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8900.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 658.
# C_2015089EN.01002601.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/26

---

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — GEA Group AG v OHIM (engineering for a better world)

(Case T-488/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Time-limit for instituting proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Notification of the decision of the Board of Appeal by fax - Receipt of the fax - Lateness - No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 089/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneiders, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by S. Hanne, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2013 (Case R 935/2012-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ‘engineering for a better world’ as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | GEA Group AG shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

GEA Group AG shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our reports dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Dynamics Research Corporation on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Dynamics Research
Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109973, effective October 24,
2003).





/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP





Boston,
Massachusetts


March 16,
2010
No. 10-5482.

#### Mancer L. Barrington, III, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1092, 131 S. Ct. 794,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9558.

178 L. Ed. 2d 533,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 514.