alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014024EN.01003903.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/39

---

Action brought on 18 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-89/13)

2014/C 24/73

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Mansullo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decisions to recover the sum of EUR 504.67 by withholding that sum from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the each of the three months from January to March 2013.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions, contained in the applicant’s pension statements for the months January to March 2013, to withhold EUR 504,67 from the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled in respect of those months; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions, contained in the applicant’s pension statements for the months January to March 2013, to withhold EUR 504,67 from the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled in respect of those months;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the decision, whatever the form in which it was adopted, rejecting the complaint of 13 April 2013 against those decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the decision, whatever the form in which it was adopted, rejecting the complaint of 13 April 2013 against those decisions;

| — | annul each decision contained in the note of 22 April 2013 bearing the reference ‘Ref Ares(2013)790217’ in the top right-hand corner of the first page of that note; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul each decision contained in the note of 22 April 2013 bearing the reference ‘Ref Ares(2013)790217’ in the top right-hand corner of the first page of that note;

| — | order the Commission to pay to the applicant the following sums: (1) EUR 504.67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 February 2013 until actual payment of that sum; (2) EUR 504,67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 March 2013 until actual payment of that sum; (3) EUR 504,67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 April 2013 until actual payment of that sum; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay to the applicant the following sums: (1) EUR 504.67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 February 2013 until actual payment of that sum; (2) EUR 504,67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 March 2013 until actual payment of that sum; (3) EUR 504,67 together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation from 1 April 2013 until actual payment of that sum;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2012______-NM-____164______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          56,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                       615
<INVENTORY>                                        708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,000
<PP&E>                                           3,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,294
<SALES>                                          8,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,671
<CGS>                                            2,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,702
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          May-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,121,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,158,457
<PP&E>                                          86,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (41,625)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,331,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    301,727
<COMMON>                                     2,859,316
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,331,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               383,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (354,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)



</TABLE>
No. 10-410.

#### Roger McCormick, et al., Petitioners v. David Bechtol, et al.

562 U.S. 1063, 131 S. Ct. 655,

178 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9047.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 68 App. Div. 3d 1376, 891 N.Y.S.2d 188.
No. 10-6087.

#### Daniel Duran-Berroa, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 944, 131 S. Ct. 368,

178 L. Ed. 2d 238,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7331.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2806 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2806

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain 
scholarships and fellowship grants as earned income for purposes of the 
                              kiddie tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2019

 Mr. Horsford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain 
scholarships and fellowship grants as earned income for purposes of the 
                              kiddie tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SCHOLARSHIPS AND FELLOWSHIP GRANTS TREATED AS EARNED 
              INCOME FOR KIDDIE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 1(g)(4)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(C) Treatment of certain amounts as earned 
                income.--For purposes of this subsection, each of 
                following amounts shall be treated as earned income of 
                the child referred to in paragraph (1) to the extent 
                included in the gross income of such child:
                            ``(i) Distributions from qualified 
                        disability trusts.--Any amount included in the 
                        gross income of such child under section 652 or 
                        662 by reason of being a beneficiary of a 
                        qualified disability trust (as defined in 
                        section 642(b)(2)(C)(ii)).
                            ``(ii) Certain scholarships or fellowship 
                        grants.--Any scholarship or fellowship grant 
                        which is received by such child if--
                                    ``(I) such child is a candidate for 
                                a degree at an educational organization 
                                described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii), 
                                and
                                    ``(II) such scholarship or grant 
                                supports such candidacy.''.
    (b) Application to Alternative Minimum Tax.--Section 59(j)(1)(A) of 
such Code is amended by inserting ``and including amounts treated as 
earned income under section 1(g)(4)(C)'' after ``section 911(d)(2)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014421EN.01005502.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/55

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-33/13)

((Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 421/78

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa and L. Mansullo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for payment of financial compensation for the days of leave not taken when he was on sick leave from 4 January 2002 to 31 May 2005.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is order to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is order to bear his own costs.

---
No. 10-190.

#### Billy Torain, Petitioner v. AT&T Management Services, LP, et al.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 852,

178 L. Ed. 2d 583,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9608.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 468, 178 L. Ed. 2d 289, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7943.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2  CEO CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Erie Family Life Insurance Company
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey A.
Ludrof
Jeffrey A. Ludrof
President and CEO

March 27, 2003

131
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/s/    RAJEEV MADHAVANRajeev Madhavan Chief Executive Officer




February 9, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of EDO Corporation and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-69243)
pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan and the EDO
Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-1526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan and the
EDO Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1983 Long-term Incentive Plan, the
EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Stock
Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77865) pertaining to the EDO Corporation
Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO Corporation 1997 Non-employee Director
Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, of our
reports dated February 15, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of EDO Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, and with respect to the
financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K).

New York, New York                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 18, 2002
[cad 157]<PAGE>

                                    LETTER AGREEMENT


March 29, 2000


Mr. James Rutherford, VP, Operations
Logix Communications Corporation of Oklahoma
100 Park Avenue, Suite 900
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102


Dear Mr. Rutherford:


Upon its execution by both parties, this letter agreement herewith releases
Logix Communications Corporation of Oklahoma ("Logix") from any further
obligations to issue Orders under its "Minimum Initial Systems Quantity
Committment", as defined in a Letter of Commitment dated June 19, 1998,
between Logix Communications Corporations of Oklahoma and Nortel Networks
Inc. (f/n/a "Northern Telecom Inc") ("Nortel Networks") ("Letter of
Commitment"). Initially capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this
Letter Agreement shall have the same meaning as in the Letter of Commitment.

In consideration of this release from the Minimum Initial Systems Quantity
Commitment, Logix herewith releases Nortel Networks from any further
obligation to provide any and all commitment-related credits or other
incentives, as specified in the Letter of Commitment, with respect to any
Orders that are received and accepted by Nortel Networks on or after the date
this Letter Agreement is executed by the parties. Such credits and other
incentives include, but are not necessarily limited to, training credits,
credits against translation services, product credits for every fifth (5th)
Initial System purchased, the product credits specified in Attachment 1 of
the Letter of Commitment, and Special Extension Pricing for DTE, DTEI and
ESMA configurations.

Credits or other Incentives that have already accrued and been issued to
Logix, or that are recognized by Nortel Networks as having been earned based
upon Orders received and accepted prior to the date this Letter Agreement is
executed by the parties, shall remain subject to use by Logix in accordance
with the terms of the Letter of Agreement and MPA. In addition, the
releases herein granted shall not operate to terminate Logix's commitment in
the last paragraph of the Letter of Commitment to purchase and/or license
exclusively from Nortel Networks all of its requirements for certain products
specified therein.

Please indicate Logix's acceptance of this Letter Agreement by signature of
an authorized company officer below, and the return of an original copy to
Nortel Networks.

<PAGE>


Agreed and accepted for:               Agreed and accepted for:

NORTEL NETWORKS INC.                   LOGIX COMMUNICATIONS
                                       CORPORATION OF OKLAHOMA


By:  Patricia Smith                    By:  James Rutherford
   -----------------------------          -------------------------------
Title:   Director Contracts            Title:   VP Operations
      --------------------------             ----------------------------
Date:    4-18-00                       Date:    4-5-00
     ---------------------------             ----------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Theundersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qto which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.

 

 
| Date: November 4, 2005 | /s/ Thomas E. D’Ambra                  |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                        | Name: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.         |
|                        | Title: Chairman of the Board, President and |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer                     |

 

----
No. 10-7101.

#### Brian Daniels, Petitioner v. Willie L. Eagleton, Warden.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 671,

178 L. Ed. 2d 499,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9118.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 341.
No. 10-493.

#### Harry Meyer Katz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 612,

178 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8824.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5473.

#### Anthony Norman Roark, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 305,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7547.

178 L. Ed. 2d 198,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 368.
No. 10-5359.

#### Anthony E. Lewis, Petitioner v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 917, 131 S. Ct. 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7409.

178 L. Ed. 2d 186,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








18 U.S.C.
Certification of Donny R. Johnson


Chief
Financial Officer of


Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended
February 1, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:




(a)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and;




(b)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.  and Subsidiaries and will be retained by
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April
16, 2009


By: /s/ Donny R.
Johnson


Donny R.
Johnson


Executive Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer