alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                EATON CORPORATION
                         2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                   ITEM 15(B)
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

This written statement is submitted in accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It accompanies Eaton Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 ("10-K Report").

I hereby certify that, based on my knowledge, the 10-K Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C 78m), and information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Eaton Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Date: February 28, 2007                 /s/ Alexander M. Cutler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alexander M. Cutler
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
                                        President
**EXHIBIT 31(a)**

**CEO CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Robert J. McNally, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EQT Corporation; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| April 29,   2019         |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/   Robert J. McNally       |   |   |
| Robert   J. McNally           |   |
| Principal   Executive Officer |   |
|                               |        |  |

 

91

----
No. 10-7669.

#### Gregory William Flack, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1158, 131 S. Ct. 957,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 97.

178 L. Ed. 2d 789,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 467.
EE-RM-STD-00-100 COMMENT 06A

/00 

Dear Participant: 

This e-mail is to provide further information concerning the public workshop that the 

Department of Energy will be holding on July 11, 2000, in Washington, DC on its notice of 

document availability regarding energy efficiency for commercial HVAC and water heating 

products. The workshop will start at 9:00 am and end at 5:00 pm. It will be held in Room lE245 ofthe Forrestal Building at 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20585. The 

agenda is attached. 

We request each participant who requested to speak at the workshop to make a 4-minute 

opening statement. The opening statement should be limited to general comments and 

identification of key issues relevant to this notice. 

At the conclusion of the opening statements we will have a facilitated discussion of the 

issues raised in comments on the screening analysis and DOE's inclinations based on these 

analysis discussed in the Federal Register notice. Participants will have an opportunity to speak 

on each issue and should be prepared to answer questions by DOE staff and by other participants 

concerning these issues. 

At the end of the discussions, we will provide all participants the opportunity to make 

general closing statements. 

Cyrus N asseri, 

Commercial Equipment Program 

Manager 

Office of Building Research and 

Standards
No. 10-442.

#### Detective Richard McKinley, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Petitioner v. Theodore W. White, Jr.

562 U.S. 1091, 131 S. Ct. 799,

178 L. Ed. 2d 531,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9519.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 525.
No. 09-11114.

No. 09-11542.

No. 10-5520.

#### Elex Pierre, Petitioner v. United States. Exuis Louis, Petitioner v. United States. Jimmy Louisuis, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 636,

178 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9279.

November 29, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Norfolk’s Stubblefield honored as top employee at annual DLA award ceremony

/ Published Dec. 22, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 

Kareneshia Stubblefield, distribution process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Va., was honored as one of the Top 10 Employees of the year at the 48th annual employee recognition ceremony Dec. 10 for her work in the distribution center’s Intermodal Hub. 

DLA director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, along with Distribution’s commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix were on hand to present the award.

According to the organization’s commander, Navy Capt. Harry Thetford, Stubblefield****is recognized as an Intermodal Hub expert in the Consolidation and Containerization Point receiving module of Distribution Standard System, DLA Distribution’s main warehousing system. 

He added that Stubblefield doesn’t hesitate to share her talents.****New personnel are given a two-hour familiarization course on the system and then paired with Ms. Stubblefield for hands-on CCP receiving experience. “Not only does she provide on-the-job training on small parcel and bulk freight receiving, but she ensures her protégées are schooled in the processes in order to be fully audit-ready.  Her efforts have ensured the workforce is fully capable in these areas,” said Thetford.

She is also eager to expand her knowledge base and capabilities.  Intermodal Hub has a cross-training program with nine qualifications to fully qualify in all operations of IMH’s Container Operations division. Stubblefield completed eight of the nine qualifications, including Foreign Military Sales processing, container outloading, household goods processing, and small parcel shipping.  

“Ms. Stubblefield is the anchor of the Intermodal Hub’s general cargo receiving operations.  Last year alone, she received more than 10,300 pieces of general cargo. On her top performance day, she processed an eye-popping 399 pieces in one eight-hour shift. She truly sets the example for peers to follow,” said Thetford.
# C_2016260EN.01000401.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Envirotec Denmark ApS v Skatteministeren

(Case C-550/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Reverse charge mechanism - Article 198(2) - Gold material or semi-manufactured products - Meaning - Article 199(1)(d) and Annex VI - Used materials, waste and scrap - Ingots resulting from the melting down of various objects and scrap used to enable the extraction of gold and with a purity in gold of 325 thousandths or greater))

(2016/C 260/04)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Envirotec Denmark ApS

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteministeren

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 198(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that it applies to the supply of ingots, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, consisting of a random, rough alloy obtained from the fusion of scrap and various metal objects containing gold, and other metals, materials and substances, and which, depending on the ingot, have a gold content of approximately 500 or 600 thousandths.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.

1

---
# DLA Aviation Academy educates military and civilians about critical assets supporting the nation’s warfighters   

/ Published July 29, 2016
RICHMOND, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Academy was held in the McKeever Auditorium on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, July 19-21.

During the three-day session, almost 40 military and civilian personnel heard from different subject matter experts in various DLA Aviation operational areas such as continuous process improvement, better buying power, weapon systems program management, procurement/eprocurement and DLA Aviation’s Captains of Industry initiatives. They were also split into groups for knowledge review sessions.
# C_2013359EN.01002001.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/20

---

Order of the General Court of 17 October 2013 — Transworld Oil Computer Centrum and Others v Eurojust

(Case T-192/13) (1)

1

2013/C 359/37

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
1 

### R i o s , G e r a rdo

F r om: R i o s , G e r a r do S e nt: T ue s da y , F eb r ua ry 05, 2013 8:58 AM T o: J i m .Re xr oad @ m a c qua r i e. c om Cc: W A L T E R S

, J ULI E ; R iv e r a, S h i r l e y ; D r a k e, K e rry S ub jec t: E x ten s i on Reque st

H i J i m ,
A s w e d i sc u ss ed l a s t w e e k
, he r e i s an e l e c t r on i c c op y o f the a c k now l e d ge m ent l et te r fo r the Av e n a l E ne r g y P r o j e c t PS D pe r m i t e x ten s i o n r eq u e s t

.

Av e n a l - O A R- 0848. p df

G e r a r do C. R i o s Ch i e f

, P e r m i t s O ff i c e Ai r D i v i s i on P H O N E : ( 415 ) 972

- 3 97 4 F A X : ( 4 15 ) 9 47

- 3 57 9
No. 10-364.

#### Tina M. Randolph, Petitioner v. Dimension Films, et al.

562 U.S. 1062, 131 S. Ct. 648,

178 L. Ed. 2d 480,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9353.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 449.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17153]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which may require participation 
in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning 
of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986): 
Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, 
Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Republic of.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Philip West,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 98-17153 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[ERA Docket No. 84-15-NG; ERA Docket No. 87-40-NG; FE Docket No. 94-96-
NG


Office of Fossil Energy; Pan-Alberta Gas (U.S.) Inc., Successor 
to Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Order Transferring Long-Term 
Authorization To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy 
(DOE) gives notice that it issued DOE/FE Order No. 1009-A on June 25, 
1998, transferring Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company's (Northwest 
Alaskan) import authorization granted by DOE/FE Order No. 1009 (Order 
1009), et al., to Pan-Alberta Gas (U.S.) Inc. Order 1009, et al., 
authorizes the importation of up to 300,000 Mcf of natural gas per day 
on an average annual daily basis (240,000 Mcf per day on a firm basis 
and 60,000 Mcf per day on an interruptible basis). The term of the 
authorization expires October 31, 2003.
    This order may be found on the FE web site at <a href="http://
www.fe.doe.gov">http://
www.fe.doe.gov</a>., or on our electronic bulletin board at (202) 586-7853. 
It is also available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities Docket Room, 3E-
033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20585-0334, (202) 586-9478. The Docket Room is open between the 
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., June 25, 1998.
John W. Glynn,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy
[FR Doc. 98-17779 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 10-7110.

#### Paulino Sanchez-Chaparro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 671,

178 L. Ed. 2d 500,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9379.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 639.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 6,339,000
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            384,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              60,000
<INVENTORY>                                               21,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       6,832,000
<PP&E>                                                   593,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                           144,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         8,028,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    866,000
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                2,000
<COMMON>                                                  62,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             6,271,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           8,028,000
<SALES>                                                  474,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         544,000
<CGS>                                                     29,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            219,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       2,743,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,551,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (3,845,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (3,845,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         2,087,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (1,758,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.31)



</TABLE>
# C_2016098EN.01000501.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2016 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-163/14) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 343 TFEU - Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union - Article 3 - Tax exemptions - Brussels-Capital Region - Contributions in respect of the supply of electricity and gas))

(2016/C 098/05)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and I. Martínez del Peral, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: J.-C Halleux, S. Vanrie and T. Materne, Agents, assisted by G. Block, D. Remy and H. Delahaije, avocats)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by not exempting the EU institutions from the contributions laid down by Article 26 of the Order concerning the organisation of the electricity market in the Brussels-Capital Region and by Article 20 of the Order concerning the organisation of the gas market in the Brussels-Capital Region, as amended, and by objecting to the refund of the contributions thereby collected by the Brussels-Capital Region, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, originally annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, and subsequently under the Treaty of Lisbon, as Protocol No 7, annexed to the TEU, the TFEU and the Euratom Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by not exempting the EU institutions from the contributions laid down by Article 26 of the Order concerning the organisation of the electricity market in the Brussels-Capital Region and by Article 20 of the Order concerning the organisation of the gas market in the Brussels-Capital Region, as amended, and by objecting to the refund of the contributions thereby collected by the Brussels-Capital Region, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second paragraph of Article 3 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, originally annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, and subsequently under the Treaty of Lisbon, as Protocol No 7, annexed to the TEU, the TFEU and the Euratom Treaty;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.

1

---
No. 10-5275.

#### John R. G., Petitioner v. Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada.

562 U.S. 1172, 131 S. Ct. 983,

178 L. Ed. 2d 812,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 52.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 269, 178 L. Ed. 2d 177, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6841.
Request for Information Phantom Aerial LLC (FAA-2015-4684) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Nelson: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-4684).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 13, 

2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 1:02 PM 

To: phantomaerial@gmail.com
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Conaton,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: 
      May 14, 2007











/s/
      John
      Conaton





John
      Conaton


Chief
      Financial Officer