alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013325EN.01003401.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/34

---

Action brought on 14 August 2013 — Brouillard v Court of Justice

(Case T-420/13)

2013/C 325/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alain Laurent Brouillard (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-M. Gouazé, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the General Court to:

| — | annul the decision of 5 June 2013 of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Directorate-General for Translation — concerning contract 2013/S 047-075037, eliminating Mr Brouillard from the lot for translation into French; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 5 June 2013 of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Directorate-General for Translation — concerning contract 2013/S 047-075037, eliminating Mr Brouillard from the lot for translation into French;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision to invite the candidate selected to tender in the context of a negotiated tender procedure relating to the conclusion of framework contracts for the translation of legal texts from certain official languages of the European Union into French (OJ 2013/S 47-075037) to submit a tender in which it is confirmed that the applicant will not be engaged in providing the services concerned on the ground that the applicant does not fulfil the full legal education requirement.

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:

| 1. | The first plea in law, alleging lack of competence of the authority which adopted the contested act. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The first plea in law, alleging lack of competence of the authority which adopted the contested act.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Directives 2000/78/EC (1) and 2005/36/EC, (2) and the case-law of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Directives 2000/78/EC (1) and 2005/36/EC, (2) and the case-law of the Court of Justice.

1

2

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment concerning the applicant's academic and professional qualifications. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment concerning the applicant's academic and professional qualifications.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

(2)  Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).

2

---
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE EGALET CORPORATION

2013 STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE EGALET CORPORATION 2013 STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN, made as of April 25, 2014 (this “Amendment”).

 

Pursuant to Section 14 of the Egalet Corporation 2013 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.     Effective upon the approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 9, 2014, Section 5.1 and 5.2 of the Plan are hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

 

“5.1.       Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13, the total number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under the Plan shall be 3,680,000.

 

5.2.         Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13, (i) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards that are intended to be Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 3,680,000 and (ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards that may be granted to any individual Participant shall not exceed 1,840,000 during any calendar year.”

 

Except as specifically provided in and modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and references to the Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Plan as modified by this Amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Egalet Corporation 2013 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 25th day of April, 2014.

 

	
 
    	
EGALET   CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Stan Musial
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Stan Musial
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-6881.

#### Jeremy Ray, Petitioner v. Fred Burnette, Warden.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 826,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9787.

178 L. Ed. 2d 563,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), Robert C. Stempel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
     Stephan W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
     do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
     of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that based on his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


    /s/ Robert C. Stempel
     ------------------------------
     Robert C. Stempel
     Chief Executive Officer
     September 13, 2004


     /s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
     ------------------------------
     Stephan W. Zumsteg
     Chief Financial Officer
     September 13, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward A. Tomechko, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do
hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
February 1, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)) and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2003        By:  /s/  Edward A. Tomechko
                                    -----------------------

                               Name:  Edward A. Tomechko
                               Title: Executive Vice President - Chief Financial
                                      Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
No. 10-6987.

#### Cynthia Holmes, Petitioner v. East Cooper Hospital, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1133, 131 S. Ct. 976,

178 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 580.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 31, 2011, within which to pay the docket*745ing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1
   
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Network-1 Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Corey M. Horowitz
 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
 November 14, 2013
# C_2013325EN.01003302.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/33

---

Action brought on 13 August 2013 — Richter + Frenzel GmbH v OHIM — Richter (Richter+Frenzel)

(Case T-418/13)

2013/C 325/56

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Richter + Frenzel GmbH + Co. KG (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Altenburg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:Ferdinand Richter GmbH (Pasching, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2013 (R 2001/2011-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2013 (R 2001/2011-4);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Richter+Frenzel’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16, 17, 19, 20, 24, 25, 35, 37, 39, 41 and 42 Community trade mark application No 8 545 998

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ferdinand Richter GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘RICHTER’, the figurative mark ‘RICHTER edition’ and the non-registered mark ‘Richter’ used in the course of trade in Austria

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2006 | /s/ Mark T. Frost                                                            |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Name: Mark T. Frost  Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
# C_2014129EN.01003702.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/37

---

Action brought on 20 December 2013 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-125/13)

(2014/C 129/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the appraisal report for 2012, covering the period from 1 October 2011 to 31 December 2012, and of the objectives set for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2013, and claim for damages

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant’s appraisal report of 15 March 2013 covering the period from 1 October 2011 to 31 December 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s appraisal report of 15 March 2013 covering the period from 1 October 2011 to 31 December 2012;

| — | annul the objectives set for the applicant by OHIM in respect of the period January to December 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the objectives set for the applicant by OHIM in respect of the period January to December 2013;

| — | order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Tribunal for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Tribunal for the non-material damage suffered;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco
B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. May 13, 2004
    
    BY:
    
    /S/ ROCCO B. COMMISSORocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerBY:
    
    /S/ MARK E. STEPHANMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001065351
<NAME> INET TECHNOLOGIES, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         140,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                       939
<INVENTORY>                                      6,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,706
<PP&E>                                          10,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                     677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,420
<SALES>                                         32,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,961
<CGS>                                            7,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,477
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
No. 10-6234.

#### Donnell Raglin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 486,

178 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7965.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                  SUPPLEMENT TO
                        WITS BASIN PRECIOUS MINERALS INC.
              SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT AND INVESTMENT REPRESENTATION

                       UNITS OF COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS

Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc.
520 Marquette Avenue, Suite 900
Minneapolis, MN   55402

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      This letter serves to supplement that certain  Subscription  Agreement and
Investment  Representation  between  Wits  Basin  Precious  Minerals  Inc.  (the
"Company") and the undersigned,  relating to the purchase of units consisting of
common stock and warrants of the Company (as heretofore amended or supplemented,
the "Subscription  Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings ascribed in the Subscription Agreement.

      1.    Amendment  of  Registration   Rights.   The   undersigned   investor
understands that in the event the Registration Statement (referred to in Section
10 of the Subscription Agreement, the "Registration  Statement") is not declared
effective by the United States  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC")
within sixty (60) days following the  termination of the Offering by the Company
(following the final closing of the sale of the Units, the "Final Closing"), the
Company  shall be obligated to reduce the  exercise  price of the Warrants  from
$0.25 per share to $0.10 per share.

      2.    Change in Unit Size. The undersigned  investor  further  understands
that in the event the  Registration  Statement is not declared  effective by the
SEC within sixty (60) days  following  the Final  Closing of the Offering by the
Company,  the Company shall be obligated to promptly  issue the  undersigned  an
additional  warrant,  in form similar to the Warrants,  allowing the purchase of
one-half (1/2) of a share of Common Stock for each Unit purchased.

      The undersigned investor understands that, except as expressly modified by
this Supplement,  all other terms and provisions of the  Subscription  Agreement
remain in full force and effect.

Dated:_____________, 2004

__________________________________              ________________________________
Signature                                       Signature

__________________________________              ________________________________
Name Typed or Printed                           Name Typed or Printed


      ----------------------------ACCEPTANCE------------------------------

      On behalf of Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., the undersigned authorized
officer hereby accepts this Supplement to the Subscription Agreement.

Dated:__________________, 2004.

WITS BASIN PRECIOUS MINERALS INC.

By_____________________________________
  Name:________________________________
  Title:_______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 20, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas, and Metro-Corp 
Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to become bank holding companies 
by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of MetroBank, N.A., 
Houston, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, Manager 
of Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, 
San Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. InterWest Bancorp, Oak Harbor, Washington; to merge with 
Kittitas Valley Bancorp, Ellensburg, Washington, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Kittitas Valley Bank, N.A., Ellensburg, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 22, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-16982 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F