alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rogalin s ki, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022

- Ohio

- 4240.]

D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . R OGALINSKI . [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rogalin s ki , ___ Ohio St.3d ___,
20 2 2

- Ohio

- 4240 .] Attorneys at law

—

Reciprocal discipline from the Supreme Court of Kentucky

— public reprimand

— Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4). (No. 2022

- 1327

— Submitted October 27 , 20 2 2

— Decided November 29 , 20 2 2 .)
O N C ERTIFIED O RDER of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, No. 22

- SC

- 0144

- KB.

__________________ {¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(20). {¶ 2} On October 27, 2022, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Kentucky entered June 16, 2022, in Rogalinski v. Kentucky Bar Ass n. , Case No. 2022

- SC

- 0144

- KB, imposing a public reprimand upon respondent. On October 31, 2022, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state. No objections were filed, and this cause was

co nsidered by the court

. {¶ 3} On consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(20)(C), respondent, Clara Elizabeth Rogalinski, Attorney Registration No. 0100241, last known business address in Elizabethtown,
Kentuck y, is publicly reprimand, and this entry shall constitute the public reprimand. This public reprimand shall be considered as a factor that may justify an increase in the degree of discipline to be imposed for subsequent misconduct. {¶ 4} It is further ordered b y the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection pursuant to Gov.Bar R.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered by the court th at if after the date of this order, the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection within 90 days of the noti ce of that award. {¶ 5} It is further ordered that respondent shall keep the clerk and disciplinary counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may
receive communications. {¶ 6} It is further ordered that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sen ding this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent’s last known
address. {¶ 7} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provid ed for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , and B RUNNER , JJ., concur.

______________________
# National Hispanic Heritage Spotlight: Yolanda Rodriguez

/ Published Sept. 15, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In honor of National Hispanic Heritage Month, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution spotlights Yolanda Rodriguez, a transportation assistant at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California.

Rodriguez believes that it is important to recognize National Hispanic Heritage Month.

“It is the celebration of the history of my ethnic heritage and my culture. Our authentic foods and special music bring families and friends together. Most importantly, the sacrifices our ancestors made and the hard work to incorporate a better life for their children.”

Something that Rodriguez believes to be unique to her heritage is her family traditions.

“Family traditions are continuous for our family and instilled to be carried on by our younger generation,” she said. “We embrace our holidays with celebrations with family, foods and/or help others in our family in need., The roots of our upbringing are the bonds we have with family and friends. Our foods are the upmost delicious foods that all cultures seem to enjoy.”

An important accomplishment that Rodriguez has achieved is that she is the second vice president of the National Defense Transportation Association.

“I am a member of the National Defense Transportation Association and am currently holding the position of second vice president,” she said. “We raise money to provide scholarships to students throughout San Joaquin County. Some of these events include golf tournaments and bingo events to have been able to spread out $20,000 a year to help those with their education.”

A little-known fact about Rodriguez is that she likes to volunteer whenever she can.

“An important aspect of my life is that I like to volunteer and help with causes that truly mean something to me. I do not hesitate to assist in an organization that I might belong to or help setup a fundraiser if needed. Some volunteering I have helped with is for people in need of medical assistance with bills, hardships due to unfortunate circumstances, or unexpected death and funds are needed. I dive in and get help from my immediate family to get the support to overcome these necessary funds and help as needed. I am currently involved with Veterans of Foreign Wars Auxiliary and reach out to our Veterans to see that their needs are taken care of monthly as well. My main goal in my life is to help as much as I can and aid and volunteer my time.”

It is important to Rodriguez that DLA Distribution recognizes exactly how important that National Hispanic Heritage Month is.

“To me, it’s an honor that DLA Distribution recognizes our history, culture, and our past generation and it shows our heritage that our hard work is noticed.”

Rodriguez wants the DLA Distribution workforce to take from National Hispanic Heritage Month that it is important to recognize the hard work of Hispanic people.

“It is important that people understand the importance of our standards, purposes, and values. We work hard and our perseverance that we encumber in our daily work ethics shows.”
No. 10-6543.

#### Josephine Foreman and David Foreman, Petitioners v. Louisiana, et al.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 854,

178 L. Ed. 2d 585,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9622.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 534, 178 L. Ed. 2d 393, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8639.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|Certification of Glen L. Shank
President and Chairman of the Board  of  Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|I, Glen L. Shank,
President and Chairman of the Board of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., hereby certify, in
accordance with  18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1,  2004, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K  for the year ended February 1,
2004, which accompanies this  certification, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | By: | /s/ Glen L. Shank Glen L. Shank President and Chairman of the Board
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  April 30, 2004
|----------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

Date: July 30, 2004

                                                 By: /s/ Christopher G. Kenber
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                 Name: Christopher G. Kenber
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/S/    RAJEEV MADHAVANRajeev MadhavanChief Executive OfficerDecember 11, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
83

Table 45. Tuberculosis Cases and Percentages, by Noninjecting Drug Use,1 Ages >15 Years: 

Reporting Areas, 2016

Reporting area

United States

Total 

cases

8,878

Cases with information on

noninjecting drug use

No.

8,759

(%)

(98.7)

Cases reporting noninjecting drug use

No.

599

(%)

(6.8)

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York State2

New York City

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

108 108 (100.0) 15 (13.9)

50 49 (98.0) 15 (30.6)

185 182 (98.4) 30 (16.5)

86 86 (100.0) 5 (5.8)

2,011 1,966 (97.8) 119 (6.1)

61 60 (98.4) 3 (5.0)

51 51 (100.0) 2 (3.9)

15 15 (100.0) 1 (6.7)

25 25 (100.0) 1 (4.0)

616 612 (99.4) 43 (7.0)

283 279 (98.6) 31 (11.1)

115 113 (98.3) 1 (0.9)

14 12 (85.7) 0 (0)

326 323 (99.1) 21 (6.5)

102 102 (100.0) 7 (6.9)

48 45 (93.8) 1 (2.2)

39 39 (100.0) 3 (7.7)

90 90 (100.0) 5 (5.6)

122 117 (95.9) 10 (8.5)

23 23 (100.0) 1 (4.3)

214 210 (98.1) 2 (1.0)

182 181 (99.5) 4 (2.2)

125 124 (99.2) 7 (5.6)

149 149 (100.0) 1 (0.7)

57 56 (98.2) 6 (10.7)

99 97 (98.0) 5 (5.2)

4 4 (100.0) 1 (25.0)

25 23 (92.0) 2 (8.7)

53 53 (100.0) 5 (9.4)

14 14 (100.0) 1 (7.1)

282 279 (98.9) 3 (1.1)

37 36 (97.3) 3 (8.3)

193 190 (98.4) 8 (4.2)

554 546 (98.6) 33 (6.0)

206 206 (100.0) 21 (10.2)

21 21 (100.0) 2 (9.5)

135 133 (98.5) 9 (6.8)

72 71 (98.6) 9 (12.7)

65 63 (96.9) 6 (9.5)

164 164 (100.0) 3 (1.8)

11 11 (100.0) 0 (0)

87 83 (95.4) 7 (8.4)

12 12 (100.0) 1 (8.3)

98 98 (100.0) 12 (12.2)

1,181 1,181 (100.0) 108 (9.1)

18 18 (100.0) 0 (0)

5 5 (100.0) 0 (0)

196 196 (100.0) 8 (4.1)

199 190 (95.5) 9 (4.7)

14 13 (92.9) 1 (7.7)

35 34 (97.1) 8 (23.5)

1 1 (100.0) 0 (0)

American Samoa3

Fed. States of Micronesia3

Guam3

Marshall Islands3

N. Mariana Islands3

Puerto Rico3

Republic of Palau3

U.S. Virgin Islands3

1 1 (100.0) 0 (0)

86 86 (100.0) 0 (0)

63 59 (93.7) 0 (0)

131 131 (100.0) 4 (3.1)

18 18 (100.0) 0 (0)

68 68 (100.0) 8 (11.8)

20 20 (100.0) 0 (0)

0 0 ... 0 ...

1

Noninjecting drug use within past 12 months of TB diagnosis. Percentage based on 52 reporting areas (50 states, New York City, and 

the District of Columbia).

2

Excludes New York City.

3

Not included in U.S. totals. 

Note: Ellipses (...) indicate that the percentage cannot be calculated, and the denominator is 0.
# San Diego distribution center welcomes new commander

/ Published July 31, 2015
SAN DIEGO, California, 
United States Navy Capt. John Soracco assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Diego, Calif., on July 31 with a traditional Navy ceremony officiated by Naval Supply Systems Command Global Logistics Support vice commander William E. Bickert, Jr. Soracco’s mother, Sara, assisted in pinning the Command Ashore Insignia on her sons uniform.   

Originally from Mercer Island, Wash., Soracco was commissioned in the U.S. Navy through the NROTC program at Washington State University in May 1990. He holds master’s degrees in business administration and national security and strategic studies.

Soracco’s initial sea tours were as a surface warfare officer on the USS Jesse L. Brown (FF 1089) and USS Vicksburg (CG 69), before his lateral transfer and redesignation as a Supply Corps officer.  He was subsequently assigned as supply officer on the USS Lewis B. Puller (FFG 29) and upon the decommissioning of the Puller, he was assigned as supply officer on the USS Kinkaid (DD 965).  

Next, Soracco was assigned as assistant supply officer, USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76).  Most recently he served as the supply officer, USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), home ported in Everett, Wash.  Soracco has deployed twice to the Caribbean Sea, the Mediterranean Sea/Arabian Gulf, and three Western Pacific/Arabian Gulf deployments.

Ashore, Soracco served as weapons system manager for Hull, Mechanical & Electrical Division, Naval Inventory Control Point, Mechanicsburg, Pa. He was subsequently selected as aide to the Commander, Naval Inventory Control Point, with follow-on assignment as integrated weapon system team leader for the S-3B Viking and C-130/KC-130J Hercules aviation platforms, Naval Inventory Control Point Philadelphia, Pa.  Next, he was assigned to the staff of Commander, Naval Air Forces as the force supply afloat policy, training, and inspection officer.  He was then assigned to the Naval War College, Newport, R.I.  Following Naval War College, Soracco was assigned to headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, Va.  Most recently, Soracco was assigned to the staff of Chief of Naval Operations, branch head, Spares Programs and Policy (N412).

“My prior operational policy tours have provided me the background and leadership development to prepare me for this challenging and vital warfighter supporting assignment,” said Soracco.

Soracco’s personal decorations include the Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, two Meritorious Service Medals, six Navy/Marine Corps Commendation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, and two Navy Achievement Medal. He is a qualified surface warfare officer, surface warfare supply corps officer, and naval aviation supply officer. He is a member of the Defense Acquisition Corps and a designated joint specialty officer.
# C_2016027EN.01003302.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-367/13) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Rural Development - Expenditure incurred by Poland - Article 33b of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 - Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 - Mixed financial correction - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 027/38)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (Represented by: B. Majczyna and K. Straś, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/214/EU of 2 May 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 123, p. 11), in so far as the Commission applies in that decision corrections amounting to EUR 8 292 783,94 and EUR 71 610 559,39 to expenditure declared by the Republic of Poland in respect of support for semi-subsistence farms.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

let.ta of ?abrmrt



### Departmat 011

th ue f o tul4 l ttr o hed o r la ten4 ont

o?a h a 

### 0 eta had aorre6-

&rid. 432 of tkr Panel Code, prortdirr “110 otfloor ot **Qhlr** strtr or My offloer **of any**  **4irtrlot eorrnt**  dirtriot, or o&r maa **1 graoioot,**  rohool **)** 

### l lO J, 01~81au dirlrlon of thir

# a

WUlr brothor@-la-law are rrlrtrd rithla thr **tirrt dylrro**  **b** 

# attinlty **I?. ?,**  **8, RI**  **00, ‘**  **1.** Wortos, # App. 0. 0. See. 

### 55) md hrnor wlthla 

### tk. prohlbitad dwwoi

i **relationrbi) art**  **forth in**  

### thrArtlol* 432 of tbrPanal

0040) it will **br noted**  **that** r\trhArtirla 

### a pl1.1anl~, "whoa

the ralrrt, few, or oonprnrrtloa of ma 4 **appointee ir**  **to bo**  paid 

### for,Ilrratly ot InUreoll~, out of OF fxm pub116tudr oh f8rr oi offbe of a&y kind or Oharrota? wh@t8O@V~*. Slaoo thhr



### eamrrl lawa provi$r a0 eompwratlon dlroot 0t lndlYaO%, for 

## taaapmm rohool 4lsttlrt tmu~“r, it 10 

### ourviw that 

### Artiole 432 of tha 

### W&al 

### Oede 18 imp lleablo to 

### thr lnrtral,

08s.r eoayrr splQloQ# 80, o-7771 10. o-1822 of thlr Da~r*aut.

Yhnrfare thle lo to a4vlre. that in our epialm tha **trurteor** l

f thr I& Xadrpendurt 80-1 DlrtrlOt rrY le@l fill tbhr

vaoanbf 

### l

X&RtiQ# 011 t&8 **~0~6 by**  **WPohtinll** l brot 

### I;

or-in-tar 

### ot O&O 

### of the %ru#teOa. 

### ve?y truly

your8 mro~18'~~Qll;t

O? ypd
#### Com. v. Crenshaw

12/01/2015

487 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1141
**Exhibit 32.1**     The following certification accompanies Dynamics Research    Corporation’s Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006 and is not filed as    provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of    Regulation S-K    of the Securities and Exchange Commission.     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     In connection with the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Dynamics Research Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation    (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31,    2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the    date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief    Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as    amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     By
No. 10-7120.

#### Marcus D. Dukes, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 672,

178 L. Ed. 2d 500,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9189.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 270.
# C_2013171EN.01003901.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/39

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — SCA Tissue France v Commission

(Case T-237/13)

2013/C 171/77

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SCA Tissue France (Bois Colombes, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste in so far as it adds hollow tubes, except those intended for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste in so far as it adds hollow tubes, except those intended for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission

---