alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014315EN.01005002.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/50

---

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Group’Hygiène v Commission

(Case T-202/13) (1)

1

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Professional association - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/85

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Group’Hygiène (Paris, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France SAS and of Schweitzer SAS. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France SAS and of Schweitzer SAS.

| 3. | Group’Hygiène is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Group’Hygiène is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6650.

#### Timothy Hines, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1142, 131 S. Ct. 907,

178 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 315.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 07/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
2016-1904.

#### U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Lavelle.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104234, 2016-Ohio-7783. On motion for stay “to grant 26784 Fairfax Lane remain unsold.” Motion denied as moot.
!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

!(

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Iberville

East

Baton

Rouge

Livingston

Ascension

West

Baton

Rouge

§ ̈¦10

§ ̈¦12

Pointe Coupee

Pointe Coupee

West Feliciana East Feliciana St. Helena

Tangipahoa

St. Landry

St. Martin

St. James

Assumption Iberia

St. John

the Baptist

St. Charles

Jefferson

Avoyelles

Concordia

§ ̈¦10

LSU

Baker

Pride

Capitol

Carville

Dutchtown

Port Allen

Plaquemine

Grosse Tete

French

Settlement

05/08/05, 1700 LST, 85ppb

05/10/05, 1800 LST, 86ppb

07/12/06, 1800

LST, 92ppb

06/11/06, 1800

LST, 95ppb

06/22/07, 1600 LST, 87ppb

06/29/06, 1700 LST, 89ppb

05/22/05, 1800 LST, 106ppb

05/27/05, 1700 LST, 87ppb

04/23/06, 1700 LST, 97ppb

10/19/05, 1700 LST, 88ppb

06/10/06, 1600 LST, 86ppb

06/30/06, 1700 LST, 103ppb

0 2.5 5 10 15 20

Miles

±

Analysis of High Ozone Concentrations

in Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana

EPA Region 6

GIS Support Team

Dallas, TX

October 10, 2007

20071010ML01

Sources: Census Bureau 2000 Data,

EPA Region 6, AQS Database,

1999 National Emission Inventory,

2006 LDEQ NOx Data for Pointe Coupee,

NOAA Hysplit Model for Back Trajectories.

Legend

Major NOx Stationary Emission Source (t/y)

100 - 2100 t/y

2101 - 4100 t/y

4101 - 6100 t/y

6101 - 8100 t/y

!

!

!

!

! 8101 - 10100 t/y

2004-2006 June-August 6-9 AM Weekday

NOx Concentration (ppb)

2004-2006 June-August 6-9 AM Weekday

VOC (tnmoc) Concentration (ppbC)

0-100

ppbC

201-300

ppbC

101-200

ppbC

0-10

ppb

21-30

ppb

11-20

ppb

31-40

ppb

24-Hour Back Trajectory for Ozone

Exceedance Day (2005-2007)

#*

Back trajectories are labeled with

Exceedance Date, End Time, and

Peak 8-hr Ozone Concentration

24-Hour Back Trajectory

10/19/05, 1700 LST, 88ppb

Population Density (per square mile)

1 - 500

501 - 1000

1001 - 5000

> 5000

0

6-Hour Interval

2004-2006 8-hr Ozone Design Value (ppm)

0.095 - 0.104 ppm

!( 0.085 - 0.094 ppm

!(

!( 0.081 - 0.084 ppm

!( 0.075 - 0.080 ppm

2005-2007 for Pointe Coupee
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.31  ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Addendum (the Addendum) is made effective as of the 12th day of
December, 2002 and is intended to amend a certain Employment Agreement (the
Agreement) by and between Erie Indemnity Company and Douglas F. Ziegler
effective as of December 15, 1999.

WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of the
Company and its Shareholders to secure the continued employment of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of December
10, 2002 has again agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for a period of
one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:

1.     Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby amended
by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2004.

2.     All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.



|         |                                                       |                        |     |     |                                                                         
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ATTEST:  |                                                       | ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
|/s/      | Jan R. Van Gorder
Jan R. Van Gorder
Secretary         |                        | By: | /s/ | F. William Hirt
F. William Hirt
Chairman of the Board                   
|        
|WITNESS: |                                                       |                       
|/s/      | Char Drobniewski
Char Drobniewski
Executive Secretary |                        |     | /s/ | Douglas F. Ziegler
Douglas F. Ziegler
378
Ridgeview Drive
Erie, PA 16505

55
# NYTS_2015_FORMATS

||
||
#### People v Summers

App Div, 4th Dept, 10/28/16 (Erie)

dismissed 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2709 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2709

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 clarify the definition of firefighter for the purposes of the Public 
                Safety Officers' Death Benefits Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2019

   Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. 
  Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 clarify the definition of firefighter for the purposes of the Public 
                Safety Officers' Death Benefits Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fire Police Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS' 
              DEATH BENEFITS PROGRAM.

    Section 1204(4) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284) is amended by inserting ``, 
including an individual who, in the capacity of the individual as such 
a member, engages in scene security or traffic management as the 
primary or only duty of the individual during emergency response'' 
before the semicolon.
                                 <all>
```
No. D-2485.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Robert E. Mittendorff.

562 U.S. 999, 131 S. Ct. 555,

178 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8381.

November 1, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 42, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1132, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5596.
No. 10-7413.

#### Victor Eduardo Silva, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 839,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9705.

178 L. Ed. 2d 570,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 642.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          Dynamics Research Corporation

                                60 Frontage Road

                                Andover, MA 01810

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 22, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Dynamics Research
Corporation has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to
this audit.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Donald B. Levis

Donald B. Levis
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         EDO CORPORATION'S SUBSIDIARIES

                               ACTIVE SUBSIDARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 STATE OR COUNTRY OF
                                                   INCORPORATION OR                    NAMES UNDER WHICH
                 SUBSIDIARY                           ORGANIZATION                  SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS

<S>                                           <C>                           <C>
AIL Technologies Inc.                         Delaware

AIL Systems Inc. (owned by AIL                Delaware                      EDO Technical Services Operations
Technologies Inc.)                                                          EDO Electronic Systems Group

Darlington Inc.                               Delaware                      Darlington of Virginia, Inc.

EDO Artisan Inc.                              New Jersey

EDO Communications and
Countermeasures Systems Inc.                  California

EDO MBM Technology Limited                    United Kingdom

EDO MTech Inc.                                Pennsylvania                  EDO M. Tech

EDO Professional Services Inc.                Virginia                      Advanced Engineering & Research
                                                                            Associates Which Will Do Business In
                                                                            California As Virginia AERA, Inc
                                                                            AERA Incorporated
                                                                            AERA, Inc.

EDO Reconnaissance and                        Delaware                      EDO Communications and
Surveillance Systems, Inc.                                                  Countermeasures Systems

EDO Rugged Systems Limited                    United Kingdom

EDO (UK) Limited                              United Kingdom

EDO Western Corporation                       Utah                          EDO Electro-Ceramic Products

Specialty Plastics, Inc.                      Louisiana                     EDO Specialty Plastics
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                         88,085           150,316
<SECURITIES>                                  608,197                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,327,111           954,643
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,164,953)          (18,985)
<INVENTORY>                                   298,258           455,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,010,151         1,123,916
<PP&E>                                        264,588           262,714
<DEPRECIATION>                               (162,360)         (146,952)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,564,245         2,109,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         872,853           832,451
<BONDS>                                             0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                 0
<COMMON>                                       99,051            99,051
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,328)           (2,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,564,245         2,109,874
<SALES>                                     2,616,292         1,688,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,616,292         1,688,550
<CGS>                                         272,195            98,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,267,544         1,669,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            225,166           188,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (627,121)           22,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                  423,567             6,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                 0
<CHANGES>                                           0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,050,688)           16,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)             0.00
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 3.4**

On May 10, 2006, the Bylaws of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the “Bylaws”) were amended as follows: 

Article II, Section 2.2 of the Bylaws was amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“2.2 Number and Term of Office. The number of Directors of the Corporation shall be seven (7). Each Director (whenever elected) shall holdoffice until his successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.” 

Article IV, Section 4.12 of the Bylaws was amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“4.12 AdditionalOfficers. The Board of Directors may appoint such other officers, including interim officers, and agents as it may deem appropriate, and such other officers and agents shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers andperform such duties as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors from time to time may delegate to any officer, interim officer or agent the power to appoint subordinate officers, interim officers, oragents and to prescribe their respective rights, terms of office, authorities and duties. Any such officer, interim officer or agent may remove any such subordinate officer or agent appointed by him, with or without cause.” 

The Bylaws were further amended to replace all references to “Triton PCS, Inc.”, the former corporate name of SunCom Wireless, Inc., appearingin the Bylaws with “SunCom Wireless, Inc.”
# C_2013344EN.01006501.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/65

---

Action brought on 25 September 2013 — Leder & Schuh International v OHIM — Epple (VALDASAAR)

(Case T-519/13)

2013/C 344/119

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Leder & Schuh International AG (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: S. Korn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Valerie Epple (Bronnen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal, reject the opposition and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal, reject the opposition and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘VALDASAAR’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 591 249

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Valerie Epple

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Val d’Azur’ for goods in Class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-673.

#### Curtis A. Dukes, Petitioner v. Lancer Insurance Company, et al.

562 U.S. 1140, 131 S. Ct. 951,

178 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 565.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 159.
No. 09-1272.

#### Kentucky, Petitioner v. Hollis Deshaun King.

562 U.S. 1126, 131 S. Ct. 857,

178 L. Ed. 2d 621,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 4.

January 7, 2011.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
2014.04.30 10Q EX10.1


Ex 10.1




AMENDMENT TO
CIENA CORPORATION 2008 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN




THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 (this “Amendment”) to the Ciena Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) which increases the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan by six million, six hundred thousand (6,600,000) shares, was adopted by the Board of Directors of Ciena Corporation (the “Company”) on February 4, 2014, and is effective as of April 10, 2014, the date upon which the Amendment received approval of the stockholders of the Company.


1.  The Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 and replacing it in its entirety as follows:
“4.1. Number of Shares Available for Awards. 
 
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 hereof, the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be twenty five million one hundred thousand (25,100,000), all of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options, increased by shares of Stock covered by awards granted under a Prior Plan that are not purchased or are forfeited or expire, or otherwise terminate without delivery of any Stock subject thereto, to the extent such shares would again be available for issuance under such Prior Plan. Stock issued or to be issued under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares; or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company.”


* * * 


To record adoption of the Amendment of the Plan by the Board as of February 4, 2014, and approval of the Amendment by the Company’s stockholders on April 10, 2014, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this Amendment to the Plan.








CIENA CORPORATION






By:  /S/ David M. Rothenstein
Name:  David M. Rothenstein
Title:  Sr. VP, General Counsel and Secretary
Date:  April 10, 2014
EXHIBIT 21

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following are subsidiaries of the Company, the respective jurisdictions of
their incorporation and names (if any) under which they do business. The
Company owns all of the voting securities (including directors' qualifying
shares owned beneficially by the Company) of each such subsidiary except the
Company owns only approximately 50% of EDO (Canada) Limited.

The names of particular subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted. When
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, these omitted subsidiaries
do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as such term is defined in Rule
1-02(v) of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                         Jurisdiction        Name Under Which
                                              of                Subsidiary
     Name                                Incorporation       Does Business

EDO Western Corporation                  Utah                EDO Acoustics, and
                                                             EDO Ceramics
Barnes Engineering Company               Delaware            EDO Electro Optics
EDO (Canada) Limited                     Canada
EDO Operations (Israel) Ltd.             Israel
EDO Foreign Sales Corporation            U.S. Virgin Islands
EDO Sports, Inc.                         Delaware
EDO Western International Corporation    Delaware
EDO International Corporation            Delaware
VT Technologies, Inc.                    Delaware
EDO Energy Corporation                   Delaware
EDO Automotive Natural Gas, Inc.         Delaware