alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016211EN.01000701.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — ADM Hamburg AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

(Case C-294/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Community Customs Code - Tariff Preferences - Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Article 74(1) - Products originating from a beneficiary country - Transport - Consignments composed of a mixture of crude palm kernel oil originating in several countries benefiting from the same preferential treatment))

(2016/C 211/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ADM Hamburg AG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 74(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1063/2010 of 18 November 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where valid certificates of origin have been presented, the preferential origin, within the meaning of the generalised system of preferences established by Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007, of consignments of crude palm kernel oil may be recognised even where those products have been mixed in the tank of a vessel at the time of their transport to the European Union in circumstances where it is possible to rule out that other products, in particular products not benefiting from any preferential treatment, have been added to that tank.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

---
Troop Support contracting officer follows Amazon model
 
  By Jonathan Stack, DLA Energy Public Affairs
           YouTube Facebook
#### Com. v. Smith

03/23/2016

495 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 506
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-108416, 333-103515, 333-81940, 333-85486 and 333-115216 of Duke Energy Corporationon Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-123419, 333-29563, 333-12093, 333-50317, and 333-84222 of Duke Energy Corporation on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-126318 of Duke Energy Holding Corp. on Form S-4, of our reports datedMarch 3, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Duke Energy Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of new accountingpronouncements) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duke Energy Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

March 3, 2006
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0489

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM229AD

J41-26-008, R1 --- 4/12/11

J41-26-008 --- 10/5/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# DSCC firemen make cameo in latest fitness center video

/ Published Oct. 22, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus Morale, Welfare and Recreation Center’s staff have worked tirelessly to stay engaged with customers and develop meaningful content during the COVID-19 pandemic. After a 15-month closure, the staff at the DSCC Fitness Center was excited to reopen its doors to customers again in June. However, with restrictions on in-person group fitness classes and much of the DSCC workforce continuing to telework, fitness center staff were determined to find a creative way to bring their services to their customers, and into their homes.

WOW! Workout Wednesdays launched last month and features short, weekly workout videos that can be combined or repeated to create personalized workouts for any fitness level. Host and DSCC MWR Fitness Trainer Rio Mino provides expert instruction in this growing series, which includes Zumba, Kickboxing, Tabata Training, Yoga, Step, and most recently, The Whole Nine Yards featuring some of DSCC’s own firefighters.

The fitness center and DSCC Fire Department have an exceptional long-standing relationship. After one of the Fire Department’s daily workouts at the fitness center, Rio and fellow staff member Kristina Lukegord proposed the idea of having some of the firefighters featured in an upcoming WOW! Video. Firemen Neil Cornett, Ryan Bellman and Richard Aldrich volunteered to participate, and are now featured in the October 20th WOW! The Whole Nine Yards Video.

“Everyone had fun making [the video],” Mino said. “We’re hoping this video will help reach a broader audience. Our WOW videos are for everybody, whether you’re young or old, beginner or advanced, we just want everyone to participate and have fun while being active.”

The DSCC MWR Fitness Center staff hopes to create more WOW! Videos with the DSCC Fire Department, and possibly include cameos from other DSCC organizations in the future. WOW! Workout Wednesday videos can be viewed at www.dsccmwr.com, the DSCC MWR YouTube Page or on DSCC-MWR’s Facebook Page.
# C_2016048EN.01004501.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Perfetti Van Melle v OHIM (DAISY and MARGARITAS)

(Joined Cases T-381/13 and T-382/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word marks DAISY and MARGARITAS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Partial refusal to register - No distinctive character - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 048/50)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Perfetti Van Melle SpA (Lainate, Italy) (represented by: P. Testa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Actions brought against two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2013 (Cases R 427/2012-1 and R 430/2012-1), concerning applications for registration of the word sign DAISY and the word sign MARGARITAS as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 10 April 2013 (Cases R 427/2012-1 and R 430/2012-1), in so far as they rejected the applications for registration of the word sign DAISY and the word sign MARGARITAS as Community trade marks in respect of the following goods: ‘confectionery, pastries, sweets, soft caramels, marshmallows, caramels, chewing gum, gelatine (confectionery), liquorice, lollipops, toffee, pastilles, sugar, chocolate, cocoa’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 10 April 2013 (Cases R 427/2012-1 and R 430/2012-1), in so far as they rejected the applications for registration of the word sign DAISY and the word sign MARGARITAS as Community trade marks in respect of the following goods: ‘confectionery, pastries, sweets, soft caramels, marshmallows, caramels, chewing gum, gelatine (confectionery), liquorice, lollipops, toffee, pastilles, sugar, chocolate, cocoa’;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
# C_2015146EN.01004702.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/47

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-62/13) (1)

1

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 146/64)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to withhold the sum of EUR 500 and five further sums in the amount of EUR 504,67 from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the months July to December 2012 respectively.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-62/13 Marcuccio v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-62/13 Marcuccio v Commission.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 26.

1

---
No. 10-5773.

#### Robert Medrano, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

562 U.S. 967, 131 S. Ct. 467,

178 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7936.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE  INET TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

This Second Amendment (this "Amendment") to the Inet Technologies, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby adopted by Inet
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") this 13th day of May, 2002, to be effective as of July 31, 2002.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Board adopted the Inet Technologies, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan on July 22,
1998, to be effective at the Effective Time (as amended, the "Plan");

WHEREAS, Plan Section X.A. provides that the Board may amend the Plan at any time to become effective immediately following the
close of any Purchase Interval; and

WHEREAS, the Board approved at its meeting held March 28, 2002 the amendment of the Plan, as set forth herein, and such amendment
was approved by the stockholders of the Company at its 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held this date;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of July 31, 2002, the close of the current Purchase Interval, as follows:

Capitalized
terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

1.    Subsection
A. of Plan Section III. is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Inet Technologies, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to be
executed effective as of July 31, 2002.

| |  | INET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | By:                    
| |  |                        

---

QuickLinks
No. 10-7389.

#### Stephen Michael Mobley, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1097, 131 S. Ct. 810,

178 L. Ed. 2d 541,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9457.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 618 F.3d 539.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0631 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-142-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                    AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") dated as of December 1, 2004, is
made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and W. Lawrence Hough (the "Executive").

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement (the "EA") dated as of September 23, 2004, to
secure the services of the Executive as its President and Chief Operating
Officer; and

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive's base salary
set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $623,150, effective as of
January 1, 2005.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants
herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is
amended as follows:

      1. Defined Terms. Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of
      capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided in the EA.

      2. Amendment to Section 6(a). Section 6(a) of the EA entitled "Base
      Salary" is hereby deleted and replaced with the following new Section
      6(a):

            "(a). Base Salary. The Executive's base salary hereunder, from
            September 23, 2004 to December 31, 2004, shall be $605,000 per year,
            payable semi-monthly. Effective January 1, 2005, the Executive's
            base salary hereunder shall be $623,150 per year, payable
            semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least
            annually and make such adjustments from time to time as it may deem
            advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from
            the base salary in effect from time to time."

      3. Ratification. All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are
      hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

<PAGE>

                                      - 2 -

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this
Amendment, each as of the day and year first set forth above.

                                    VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Ronald P. Soltman
                                       ----------------------------------
                                        Ronald P. Soltman
                                        Executive Vice President

                                    EXECUTIVE:

                                    /s/ W. Lawrence Hough
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    W. Lawrence Hough
No. 10-492.

#### Youa Vang Lee, Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of Fong Lee, Decedent, Petitioner v. Officer Jason Andersen, et al.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 829,

178 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9767.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 616 F.3d 803.
No. 10-6877.

#### Jose Sanchez-Rebollar, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1036, 131 S. Ct. 583,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8698.

178 L. Ed. 2d 425,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 488.
Panangeksamen ken Panangagas iti 

Saan nga Aktibo a Sarut (TB) 

Panunoten Addanak kadi ti peggad para iti

impeksion ti TB?

Kapatangmo ti mangipapaay ti pannaripato ti salun-atmo 

maipanggep iti panagpaeksamen no sika ket:

nakilangen iti nabiit pay 

a tiempo iti maysa a tao 

nga addaan iti sakit nga 

aktibo a TB

naiyanak kadagiti 

wenno masansan a 

mapan kadagiti 

pagilian no sadino a 

kadawyan ti kaso ti 

TB, agraman dagiti 

adda iti Asia, Africa 

ken Latin America

nakapsut ti resistensia ti 

bagi gapu iti 

sumagmamano nga agagas wenno kondision ti 

salun-at kas iti diabetes, 

kanser, ken HIV

agnanaed wenno nagnaed idi 

kadagiti situasion a 

pakasarakan ti dadakkel a 

grupo no sadino a kadawyan 

ti kaso ti TB, kas kadagiti 

pagdagusan dagiti awan 

pagtaenganna, preso, wenno 

karsel

agtrab-trabaho kadagiti luglugar nga 

addaan iti nangato a panagiinnakar ti 

TB, kas kadagiti ospital, pagdagusan 

dagiti awan pagtaenganna, pasilidad ti 

pagbaludan, ken dagiti balay ti taripato

Uray dagiti tattao a nakaawat iti bakuna iti TB, a maawawagan met kas bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) a bakuna, 

ket nasken a maeksamen gapu ta kumapsut ti bakuna iti 

panaglabas ti tiempo.

Ania nga eksamen iti 

TB ti masapulko?

Adda dua a kita dagiti eksamen para 

iti impeksion ti TB: ti eksamen ti dara 

para iti TB ken ti eksamen ti kudil 

para iti TB. Ad-adu ti mayat kadagiti 

eksamen ti dara para iti TB 

kas wagas a pangeksamen iti TB para 

kadagiti tattao a nakaawat iti bakuna 

iti TB (BCG).

Nasken a pagpatangan dagiti 

mangipapaay ti pannaripato ti salunat ken dagiti pasiente no ania nga 

eksamen ti kasayaatan.

Ania dagiti pagpiliak 

a panagagas?

Tapno maammuan ti ad-adu pay maipapan iti TB ken no 

kasanom a saluadan ta bagim ken ti dadduma, bisitaen ti 

www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb

301127

Agpatingga iti 13 a milyon a tattao iti Estados Unidos ti mabalin nga addaan iti saan nga aktibo a TB 

(maawagan met kas latent nga impeksion ti TB). No awan ti panagagas, 1 kadagiti 10 a tattao nga 

addaan iti saan nga aktibo a TB ti agsakitto iti aktibo a sakit a TB, ken maiwarasda ti TB iti dadduma 

babaen iti angin. Makatulongka a manglapped iti panagwaras ti TB.

Eksamenen Agasan

Ti panangagas iti saan nga aktibo a 

TB ti kasayaatan 

a wagas tapno masaluadanka 

manipud iti aktibo a sakit a TB. No 

mabalin, irekomendar ti CDC ti 

panagusar iti apagbiit ken nanam-ay 

a 3- wenno 4 a bulan a 

panagagas iti rifamycin para iti 

saan nga aktibo a TB.
No. 10-7484.

#### Daniel Rutherford, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1117, 131 S. Ct. 843,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9735.

178 L. Ed. 2d 573,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to. §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STUART
GRAYSTON                                                 
|                                                                       
|Stuart Grayston President and Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2003