alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11394.

#### Roger Charles Menner, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1125, 131 S. Ct. 851,

178 L. Ed. 2d 582,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9616.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 191, 178 L. Ed. 2d 114, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6810.
No. 10-351.

#### Anjum Malik, Petitioner v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 601,

178 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8880.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 588.
Order entered September 17, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00704-CV

LORY K. WILSON, ET AL., Appellants

V.

CAPITAL PARTNERS FINANCIAL GROUP USA, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09275

ORDER

Before the Court is the September 16, 2020 unopposed amended motion of 

appellant Lory K. Wilson for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. 

We GRANT the motion and extend the time to September 25, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
# C_2013171EN.01003702.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/37

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — Wepa Lille v Commission

(Case T-231/13)

2013/C 171/71

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wepa Lille (Bousbecque, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 25, 2014

NO. 03-14-00477-CR

Clemente Suarez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 10-6274.

#### Max Charles Bradfield, Petitioner v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 570,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8674.

178 L. Ed. 2d 417,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10670

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTIN WYATT LACKEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-81-8

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Justin Wyatt Lackey has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Lackey has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10670 Document: 00512946032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 14-10670

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10670 Document: 00512946032 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
A Tip From A Former Smoker® 

Rose H Memorial :30 URL 

ISCI Code: VCDC0579000/H

The spot opens on the A Tip From A Former Smoker® logo and cuts to a shot of Rose sitting The 

text “Rose, 59, Texas” appears on the bottom right-hand side of the screen. 

ROSE H: My name is Rose and smoking caused my lung cancer. 

The spot cuts to a photo of Rose in the hospital. 

ROSE H: I was on chemo and radiation. 

The spot cuts to image of Rose H sitting up showing wound where chest tube was removed, then 

cuts back to Rose sitting holding up the chest tube. 

ROSE H: They took part of my lung out and they put this in me to drain the fluid

The spot cuts to image of Rose H In hospital sitting up 

ROSE H: Every day I prayed that they would remove it .

The spot cuts to Rose H sitting.

ROSE H: My tip is, be careful what you wish for. 

The spot cuts to another image of Rose sitting up showing wound then back to her sitting. 

ROSE H: That chest tube hurt a lot more coming out than it did going in 

ART CARD: Lung Cancer is the #1 cancer killer among women. It killed Rose. She was 60. 

You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.gov/tips

CDC Logo

Sponsored by the U.S. department of Health and Human Services.

#CDCTips

ANNCR: For free help, visit CDC.gov/tips
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-30391 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. WILBERT WEST, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:11-CR-99-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent W ilbert West has m oved f or leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California , 3 86 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. F lores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). West has filed a response. We have r eviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the r ecord ref

l e c ted therein, as well a s West’s response. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D February 19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-30391 Document: 00512146599 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013No. 12-30391

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMIS S E D

. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. West’s m otion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 12-30391 Document: 00512146599 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
#### People v Ayrhart

4th Dept: 145 AD3d 1657 (Orleans)

denied 3/22/17 (Garcia, J.)
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed May 1, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00927-CV

JASON MICHAEL SPENCER, Appellant

V.

DEXTRAL CAPITAL, LP, AND DEXTRAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

FUND, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-15530

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Brown, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Stoddart

Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of appellees against 

Jason M. Spencer for actual and punitive damages. The judgment also awarded $85,000.00 in 

attorney’s fees to Dextral Capital. In two issues, Spencer argues the trial court erred by awarding 

attorney’s fees to Dextral Capital because it did not prevail on a breach of contract claim and 

there was legally and factually insufficient evidence to support the amount of the fees. Appellees 

do not oppose the relief requested by appellant. 

Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the award of attorney’s fees 

in the amount of $85,000.00 to Dextral Capital. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2; McNutt v. Garick Fire 

Prot., Inc., 225 S.W.3d 657, 657–58 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no pet.) (reversal is proper 

where appellee confesses error); Ervin v. Wichita County Family Court Services, 533 S.W.2d 
–2–

947, 951 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1976, no writ). As modified, the trial court’s judgment is 

affirmed.

/ Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE

130927F.P05
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JASON MICHAEL SPENCER, Appellant

No. 05-13-00927-CV V.

DEXTRAL CAPITAL, LP, AND 

DEXTRAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

FUND, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-15530.

Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

MODIFIED as follows:

the third full paragraph on the second page of the final judgment ordering that 

Dextral Capital recover from Jason Michael Spencer the sum of $85,000.00 as 

reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees together with post-judgment interest 

thereon is deleted.

It is ORDERED that, as modified, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellant JASON MICHAEL SPENCER recover his costs of this 

appeal from appellees DEXTRAL CAPITAL, LP, AND DEXTRAL CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT FUND, LP.

Judgment entered this 1st day of May, 2015.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 29, 2006



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName:

Raymond N. JoeckelTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Walter Jackson, Petitioner, v Adrian H. Anderson et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 448]

*934Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Peter M. Forman, a Judge of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated December 8, 2015, denying the petitioner’s application for an amendment to his pistol license.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1), which sets forth the eligibility requirements for obtaining a pistol license, requires, inter alia, that the applicant be at least 21 years of age, of good moral character with no prior convictions of a felony or serious offense, and a person “concerning whom no good cause exists for the denial of the license” (Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [n]). A person may also apply to amend his or her pistol license to include additional weapons *(see*Penal Law § 400.00 [9]). “A pistol licensing officer has broad discretion in ruling on permit applications and may deny an application for any good cause” *(Matter of Orgel v DiFiore,*303 AD2d 758, 758 [2003]; *see*Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [n]; *Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence,*36 AD3d 807, 808 [2007]).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the respondent Peter F. Forman (hereinafter the respondent) that good cause existed, based on the petitioner’s criminal history, to deny the petitioner’s application to amend his license to include additional handguns was not arbitrary and capricious, and should not be disturbed *(see Matter of Velez v DiBella,*77 AD3d 670, 670-671 [2010]; *Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence,*36 AD3d at 808). The fact that the majority of the petitioner’s arrests resulted in the dismissal of the charges against him, or were ultimately resolved in his favor, did not preclude the respondent from considering the underlying circumstances surrounding those arrests in denying the application *(see Matter of Velez v DiBella,*77 AD3d at 670-671; *Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence,*36 AD3d at 808).

Moreover, the petitioner’s constitutional challenge to the licensing scheme is unfounded *(see Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence,*36 AD3d 807 [2007]). We further note that the petitioner’s contention that certain aspects of the licensing eligibility requirements of Penal Law § 400.00 (1) unconstitutionally infringe upon his right to bear arms under the Second Amendment (US Const 2d Amend) is not properly before this Court in an original proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, as a declaratory judgment action is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute (see *Matter of Velez v*
      *935
      *DiBella,*77 AD3d at 671).

Leventhal, J.P., Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                             Duquesne Light Company Exhibit 23.1


                         Independent Auditors' Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-
52782 and 33-63602, and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
Nos. 33-53563 and 33-53563-01 of Duquesne Light Company on Form S-3 of our
report dated January 27, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Duquesne Light Company for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1998
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00618-CV

In re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. The Court orders the real party in interest to 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 11, 2022.

It is ordered on October 4, 2022.

Before Chief Justice Byrne and Justices Triana and Smith
# C_2015034EN.01003802.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Oracle America v OHIM — Aava Mobile (AAVA CORE)

(Case T-618/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AAVA CORE - Earlier Community word mark JAVA and well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6a of the Paris Convention JAVA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No likelihood of association - Link between the signs - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 034/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oracle America, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: T. Heydn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aava Mobile Oy (Oulu, Finland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 1369/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Oracle America, Inc. and Aava Mobile Oy.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action.

| 2) | Orders Oracle America, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Oracle America, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2737 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. LIPINSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

4 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2737 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

2 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2737 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

2 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac3 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 FOR AREMISSOFT CORPORATION
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               15,238
<SECURITIES>                          1,803
<RECEIVABLES>                        20,155
<ALLOWANCES>                           (507)
<INVENTORY>                           1,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     41,870
<PP&E>                                1,960
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       59,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                20,338
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 15
<OTHER-SE>                           38,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         59,166
<SALES>                              12,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     21,517
<CGS>                                 2,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     13,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       3,119
<INCOME-TAX>                            624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,495
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,495
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.14


</TABLE>