alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-7412.

#### Ricardo Rios-Perez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1116, 131 S. Ct. 839,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9766.

178 L. Ed. 2d 569,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*570Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 662.
No. 10-6766.

#### Latroy Timmons, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1071, 131 S. Ct. 663,

178 L. Ed. 2d 495,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9361.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5815.

#### Howard D. Kelly, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 349,

178 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7328.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 194.
This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2006-CR-5268 and 2006-CR-8791, styled State of Texas v. Luis Ray 1

Jaramillo, Jr., pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl

presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00402-CR

IN RE Luis Ray JARAMILLO, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr. has filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various documents filed in two of his pending

criminal cases. Relator acknowledges he is represented by trial counsel. We conclude any original

proceeding on the issue presented should be presented by relator’s trial counsel. Relator is not

entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be

treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d
04-08-00402-CR

-2-

806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s mandamus

petition is denied.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          19,076,983
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,719,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (303,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        589,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,386,153
<PP&E>                                          27,388,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (19,449,827)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,807,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,947,200
<BONDS>                                          2,679,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           134,912
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,053,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,807,998
<SALES>                                          4,524,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,972,296
<CGS>                                            8,136,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,361,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,468,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 563,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,777,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,777,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,777,589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.06)



</TABLE>
#### People v Lawson

App Div, 4th Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 61273(U) (Onondaga)

dismissed 8/8/16 (Garcia, J.)
No. 10-7216.

#### Phillip E. Caldwell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 678,

178 L. Ed. 2d 504,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9159.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 671.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 159; Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Airborne Navigation Equipment Using Global Positioning 
System (GPS)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 159 meeting to be held July 27-31, 1998, starting at 
9:00 a.m. on July 27. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows:
    Specific Working Group Sessions: July 27: Working Group (WG)-4A, 
Precision Landing Guidance (LAAS CAT I/II/III), Rooms A and B; WG-6, 
Interference, Room C; July 28: WG-4A, Precision Landing Guidance (LAAS 
CAT I/II/III), Rooms A and B; Ad Hoc Working Group, Second Civil 
Frequency, Room C, 1:30-4:30 p.m.; July 29: WG-4A, Precision Landing 
Guidance (LAAS CAT I/II/III), Rooms A and B; WG-2C, GPS/Inertial, Room 
C; July 30: WG-4A, Precision Landing Guidance (LAAS CAT I/II/III), 
Rooms A and B; WG-2, WAAS, Room C; WG-4B, Airport Surface Surveillance, 
Room D.
    Plenary Session Agenda, July 31, 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Rooms A and 
B: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (2) Review/Approval of Minutes 
of Previous Meeting; (3) Review WG Progress and Identify Issues for 
Resolution: (a) GPS/WAAS (WG-2); (b) GPS/GLONASS (WG-2A); (C) GPS/
Inertial (WG-2C); (d) GPS/Precision Landing Guidance and Airport 
Surface Surveillance (WG-4A & WG-4B); (e) Interference (WG-6); (4) 
Review of EUROCAE Activities; (5) Review WG-4B's draft report on The 
role of GNSS in Supporting Airport Surface Operations; (6) Assignment/
Review of Future Work; (7) Other Business; (8) Date and Location of 
Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact Mr. Harold Moses, RTCA 
Program Director, at (202) 833-9339 (phone), (202) 833-9434 (fax), or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc4c1c3dfc9dfecded8cfcd82c3decb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bed6d3d1cddbcdfecccadddf90d1ccd9">[email protected]</span></a> (electronic mail). Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 24, 1998.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 98-17629 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 10-7308.

#### Ullysses Paul Cuen, Petitioner v. Anthony Hedgpeth, Warden.

562 U.S. 1150, 131 S. Ct. 934,

178 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 539.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 721.
No. 10-6397.

#### Richard Henry Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Oregon.

562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 603,

178 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8973.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 230 Or. App. 756, 217 P.3d 703.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. McMahon, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON                       
|Thomas R. McMahon                           
|Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
|November 14, 2008                           



21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,533
<PP&E>                                         118,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,766
<BONDS>                                        188,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           98,483
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,574
<SALES>                                         82,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,821
<CGS>                                           65,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,685)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                139,654
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 10-6379.

#### John Kemp MacInnis, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 494,

178 L. Ed. 2d 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7889.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 539.
No. 10-6716.

#### Charles Robert Baker, Petitioner v. D. Liadacker, et al.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 661,

178 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9422.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Rivera, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 907]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered September 22, 2015, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese, Barros and Christopher, JJ., concur.
No. 10-675.

#### Miguel Angel Gonzalez Guilbot, et al., Petitioners v. Maria del Carmen Guilbot Serros de Gonzalez, et al.

562 U.S. 1140, 131 S. Ct. 951,

178 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 449.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.

Same case below, 315 S.W.3d 533.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James A. WhiteJames A. WhiteChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2016211EN.01001801.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/18

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte GmbH v Amazon EU Sàrl, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon.de GmbH, Amazon Logistik GmbH, Amazon Media Sàrl

(Case C-572/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Article 5(3) - Concept of ‘tort, delict or quasi-delict’ - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Article 5(2)(b) - Reproduction right - Exceptions and limitations - Reproduction for private use - Fair compensation - Non-payment - Whether included in the scope of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001))

(2016/C 211/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte GmbH

Defendants: Amazon EU Sàrl, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Amazon.de GmbH, Amazon Logistik GmbH, Amazon Media Sàrl

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a claim seeking to obtain payment of remuneration due by virtue of a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, implementing the ‘fair compensation’ system provided for in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, falls within ‘matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’, within the meaning of Article 5(3) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

---
# New rapid deployment teams complete training, equipping requirements 

/ Published Dec. 28, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s ability to quickly respond to national emergencies and global contingencies grew stronger Dec. 14-16 as a group of rapid deployers completed pre-deployment training and equipping requirements. The event was hosted by the Joint Logistics Operations Center’s Mission Support Team at DLA Headquarters and is part of the agency’s Rapid Deployment Initiative.

The RDI program consists of two 13-member teams that are mission-tailored to augment logistics capabilities of geographic combatant commands and the U.S. Transportation Command’s Joint Task Force Port Opening. The task force is a joint expeditionary organization that can rapidly establish and operate a port of debarkation, as well as conduct cargo-handling and movement operations. 

RDI team members are volunteers from DLA Headquarters and field activities, representing each of DLA’s supply chains, distribution, disposition, information technology, expeditionary contracting and legal services. The teams will be available for deployment on short notice beginning Jan. 1 and will alternate on alert status every 60 days, said Jeff Crosson, a logistics operations specialist for DLA Logistics Operations.

“These teams give DLA the flexibility to react quickly and avoid going through a request for forces process, which can be very time consuming,” Crosson said. “We went through a thorough qualification and screening process to make sure we had people with the right grade and skill set. During these last two days, they’ve shown great willingness to be proactive and obviously want to support the mission.”

DLA liaisons to U.S. Northern Command and the Federal Emergency Management Agency gave informational briefings during the orientation. Other topics included current operations, operational contract support and the capabilities of DLA Distribution’s expeditionary team. 

The group also received personal protective equipment such as flak vests and were familiarized with the DLA Mobile Command Vehicle, which is a central communications hub where deployers can relay information to DLA Headquarters via voice, video or data. The 30-foot trailer encompasses five complete workstations, a storage area and a conference room.
#### People v Harris

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1244 (Chemung)

denied 8/17/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
No. 10-5322.

#### Byron Case, Petitioner v. Larry Denney, Warden.

562 U.S. 1055, 131 S. Ct. 628,

178 L. Ed. 2d 457,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9021.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 915, 131 S. Ct. 277, 178 L. Ed. 2d 182, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6909.
Exhibit 23.2





Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Escalade, Incorporated on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-16279, 333-52475, 333-52477, 333-142756 and 333-142757) of our report dated March 1, 2011, on our audit of the financial statements of Martin Yale International GmbH as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ FALK GmbH & Co KGWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftSteuerberatungsgesellschaftHeidelberg/Germany,March 1, 2011