alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.1****DUQUESNE LIGHT HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES****Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred and Preference Stock DividendRequirements**                       (Millions of Dollars)   Year Ended December 31,   **2005**  2004  2003  2002  2001    **Fixed Charges:**                    Interest on long-term debt **$****54.2**  $55.2  $53.1  $55.3  $62.3 Other interest  **1.1**   2.0   12.3   13.3   25.6 Portion of lease payments representingan interest factor  **3.1**   3.9   4.9   3.2   3.1 Dividend requirement (a)  **8.0**   6.6   9.5   15.8   16.0                 Total Fixed Charges **$****66.4**  $67.7  $79.8  $87.6  $107.0                                      **Earnings:**                    Income (loss) from continuing operations **$****112.9**  $87.2  $93.2  $26.7  $(44.5)Income taxes  **53.0**   20.6   17.7   (11.6)  (77.4)Fixed charges as above  **66.4**   67.7   79.8   87.6   107.0                 Total Earnings **$****232.3**  $175.5  $190.7  $102.7  $(14.9)                                     **Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Chargesand Preferred andPreference StockDividend Requirements**  **3.50**   2.59   2.39   1.17   (0.14) (b)                 (a) Includes annual dividend requirements of $12.6 million for the Monthly Income PreferredSecurities (MIPS) per year for 2002 and prior. For 2003, only $6.3 million is included for theperiod January 1 – June 30. From July 1, 2003 until their redemption in 2004, MIPS dividendswere included with interest on long-term debt due to the adoption of SFAS No. 150. (b) In order to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred and preference stockdividend requirements of one to one, Total Earnings would need to increase by approximately$122 million.
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lexon
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 20, 2009

/s/ James ParkChief Executive Officer

/s/ Bong Park Chief Financial Officer

---
# C_2013352EN.01002002.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/20

---

Action brought on 26 September 2013 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO ESTATE)

(Case T-522/13)

2013/C 352/38

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kenzo, SA (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 July 2013 given in Case R 1363/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 July 2013 given in Case R 1363/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KENZO ESTATE’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 31, 35, 41 and 43 — International Registration No W 1 016 724

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘KENZO’ for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark No 720 706

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-7723.

#### Sean Peters, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1159, 131 S. Ct. 962,

178 L. Ed. 2d 806,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 85.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 665.
No. 10-6955.

#### Joe Daniel Holt, Jr., Petitioner v. Gary Hetzell, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1129, 131 S. Ct. 910,

178 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 588.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Description of Executive Officer Cash Bonus Program


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 MAXYGEN INC. 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH
BONUS PROGRAM 
  
 Maxygen maintains
an Executive Officer Cash Bonus Program for executive officers that is designed to reward participants based on their individual performance and the company’s financial and other performance. The program provides for an annual bonus based upon
the company’s attainment of annual financial and other performance targets as well as subjective factors related to the individual participant’s employment performance. The annual financial and other targets for the program are set by the
Compensation Committee of Maxygen’s Board of Directors and are currently based on the company’s financial performance (revenue and cash burn), product development goals and other objectives. 
  
 Executive officers (including the CEO) are eligible to receive annual cash
performance bonuses of between 0 and 50% of base salary. The target bonus amount for the company’s executive officers is 25% of base salary. Bonus payments are paid in one annual payment shortly after the end of each calendar year.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2819 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 
    in honor of Gold Star Mothers Families, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Mothers Families National 
Monument Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK.

    Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, 
the authority provided by section 2859 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 2164; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply 
through January 2, 2024.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 
    in honor of Gold Star Mothers Families, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Executive Officer



I, James R.
Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics
Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/S/    JAMES R. BAZETJames R. BazetMarch 30, 2004
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








18 U.S.C.
1350 Certification of Lawrence J. Zigerelli


President
and Chief Executive Officer


of


Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended
February 1, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:




(a)
              the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and;


(b)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.  and Subsidiaries and will be retained by
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April
16, 2009


By:  /s/ Lawrence J.
Zigerelli


Lawrence J.
Zigerelli


President and
Chief Executive Officer
### ? ‘~::: *

.. ..:...*

. **OFFICE OF**  **THE AtrORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**

**AUSTIN**

# 3

### 224

eimw in the awunt ap ’ riatadfromtbewmiralmnd % for lt&sd pos.ltione. ‘: 8 the tq#slaturs ham item= i&ad four proft?moreof botany axxi ba~terlology

at $4,4oUit.00,

$4,000.oa, $3raoo.o~and n~oo.00, and five proieciwors

of geology at $6,600.00, roo~ .oo , $3*6Oii.W ami $3#4W&d. $3 $3 ,a30 230, ItI was, vo tA.lnlc,

oora.nly not tilebtiintor tJleLe&iulature thatfn #%plo@ag 3p nddttionalprofewar in the bokup dqsrtment, the fdanUty of the rr~icen ronflcrcd with thoaie



### rundamxl

by me holcling

an 

### 1tewil2ed

pJsitlon ln that departwnt tidght be ig;aoe8d,u* theealary p&l thbcadditioxlalj~oS@aoar OS botany be Sixexl

at the highest wtttorfzed for a proiaeoor oigeolqgy en thsgoundthatboth pnsitiom~versthow of professor, tbeugh onetmaheo aJlitt0reataitbjaotf+rom the oth6r. 

### aiaiuwitj ia 000 ch8rwtaristio 

### 18 not emou#~ 8b-sllarity in csoh of the oesentialparts la reMe salary authoria8dis that authocftodfor the ~i,pEL wklch the a&UtlollPj. po8itionPoet abarly **refm6- blesi**  **in** Its eoefmtialc&araiMristfw.

.Zn the Departwnt of’ spewh of the Univerdty of l'exas thoue is one lterrdcad position US %wi%ruso~, at 

### $3aofl .oo pes year- An additIona Proft38sor of Speeob oan~epaldnotmcwethan $34wo.o0 peryearfrmofirmral uund itw or parts OS ffw trwef0rred. The wpplaImslt= ing or euch salary 

### rreaother fund8 is grpr8rn4wl by the prottaione of'thoSL%tparaerrph of Se~tZco~ abmo qllotad. xn nc erer~t way an addltlonaln-oresieor or ~~eobbspa;tdfi~aayih~~~sProrethon~?bc paid une bold&~ the iteatlmad yosltition

of PreSaesk~ OS spweh.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005, which this
statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of ElkCorp.
  By
    
    /s/ Thomas D. KarolThomas D. KarolChief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0754

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JOHN P. RHODES,

Petitioner, Appellant,

and Cross-Appellee,

and

TRACY LABIN RHODES,

Respondent, Appellee,

and Cross-Appellant.

ORDER

Having considered Appellee and Cross-Appellant’s motion for extension of 

time, and for good cause having been shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. 

The Reply Brief shall be due no later than Wednesday, August 23, 2023.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 9 2023

08/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0754
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the Company) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Greg G. GruberGreg G. GruberSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 29, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6704

CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SWANSON SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee, and PHILLIP THOMPSON, Sheriff of Horry County in his official and individual capacity; MARK SANFORD, Governor of South Carolina; JIM MCCLAIN, Director of Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services; GWENDOLYN A. BRIGHT, Director of Parole Board Support Services, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-03-2426-RBH) Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 27, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeRichardson v. Swanson Services , No. CA-03-2426-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014339EN.01001801.xml

| 29.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/18

---

Order of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)

(Case T-478/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain) (represented by: C. Giner Mas and R. Rodriguez Zaragoza, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2013 (Case R 1000/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between NumberFour AG and Inaer Helicópteros, SA

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In connection with the Annual Report of Educational Development Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 10, 2005
    
    By
    
    /s/ Randall W. WhiteRandall W. WhitePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 10, 2005
    
    By
    
    /s/ W. Curtis FossettController and Corporate Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### In the Matter of Village of Pomona, Appellant, v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents.

[63 NYS3d 247]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review three determinations of the Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo, all dated December 27, 2011, which granted the applications of the respondent Scenic Development, LLC, for subdivision and site plan approval of the subject property, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh II, J.), dated September 10, 2012, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal has been rendered academic by the determinations of the respondent Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo *754dated March 22, 2013, granting the applications of the respondent Scenic Development, LLC, for final subdivision and site plan approval of the subject property. Since the issues raised herein have been addressed on the appeals in *Matter of Bodin v Planning Bd. of Town of Ramapo*(155 AD3d 721 [2017] [decided herewith]) and *Matter of Shapiro v Planning Bd. of Town of Ramapo*(155 AD3d 741 [2017] [decided herewith]), the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply *(see City of New York v Maul,*14 NY3d 499, 507 [2010]; *Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]; *see also Matter of Veronica P. v Radcliff A.,*24 NY3d 668, 671 [2015]; *Matter of Aloya v Planning Bd. of Town of Stony Point,*93 NY2d 334 [1999]).

Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB  for the period ending  March 31, 2002 (the
"Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
October ___, 2005