alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2726 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 157
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2726

                          [Report No. 116-199]

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 
                                trains.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                           September 9, 2019

            Additional sponsors: Ms. Moore and Mr. Grijalva

                           September 9, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 
                                trains.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banning Smoking on Amtrak Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING ON AMTRAK TRAINS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains
    ``(a) Prohibition.--Beginning on the date of enactment of the 
Banning Smoking on Amtrak Act of 2019, Amtrak shall prohibit smoking on 
board Amtrak trains.
    ``(b) Electronic Cigarettes.--
            ``(1) Inclusion.--The use of an electronic cigarette shall 
        be treated as smoking for purposes of this section.
            ``(2) Electronic cigarette defined.--In this section, the 
        term `electronic cigarette' means a device that delivers 
        nicotine or other substances to a user of the device in the 
        form of a vapor that is inhaled to simulate the experience of 
        smoking.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 243 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 157

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2726

                          [Report No. 116-199]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 
                                trains.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 9, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2013171EN.01002802.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/28

---

Action brought on 28 March 2013 — Skype/OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYPE)

(Case T-184/13)

2013/C 171/55

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Skype (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor, J. Schmitt, lawyer, and J. Mellor, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom) and Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2013 in Case R 121/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2013 in Case R 121/2011-4;

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SKYPE’ — Community trade mark application No 4 521 084 for products and services in classes 9, 38 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘SKY’ for goods and services in classes 9, 38, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 3 203 411

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods and services

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.89 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.89 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.89 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.89 MB)
 
 DLA Distribution DLA Scale Pilot
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
International Passenger Facilitation 

Issues

Advisory Committee on Aviation Consumer 

Protection

Presenter: Matthew J. Cornelius , Managing 

Director, Air Policy 

Airports Council International – North America

December 16, 2013

Washington, D.C. 

1
Agenda

Background on the Issue 

Formation of Airport/Airline 

Coalition 

Goals and Progress

www.aci-na.org 2
Issue Background

Statement of the Issues:

Persistent and excessive wait times at key 

international gateway airports need to be 

reduced to achieve the President’s goal of 

increasing travel and tourism

Airports/Airlines need access to transparent 

data on passenger wait times in order to 

evaluate where and the extent to which 

excessive waits exist 

ACI-NA/A4A/IATA are working collaboratively 

with CBP on short, medium, and long term 

solutions

Collaborative efforts have been well-received by 

CBP and progress is being made 

3
Airport/Airline Coalition: Short-Term 

Goals

Improve transparency of wait-time data

Share timely data with airlines and airports 

Amend CBP reporting formats to include threshold periods above 60 

minutes (i.e. 120 minutes; and 80 minutes

Progress: New Automated Wait Times (AWT) website running 

Place automated kiosks inside primary inspection 

Progress: APC Kiosks deployed at YVR, YYZ, YUL, ORD, JFK (T4), 

DFW, MIA

Next Steps: 

SEA and other airports; 

Mobile solutions? 

Treat administrative tasks differently – use non-law 

enforcement employees or staff only off-peak 

Progress: None 

Next Steps: Continue advocacy 

4
Airport/Airline Coalition: Short-Term 

Goals 2

Don’t expand preclearance

Progress: Abu Dhabi preclearance under development

Expand Global Entry for US citizens

Progress: Over 1 Million registered for Global Entry 

Next Steps: Increase usage and eligibility for non-U.S. citizens

Increase flexibility and operational agility 

Progress: 

CBP targeted primary inspection wait times this summer 

Moved resources to prevent problems 

Next Steps: Improve funding and preserve budgetary flexibility 

5
Airport/Airline Coalition: Medium-term 

Goals

Expand non-citizen participation in Global Entry

Progress: New fully-reciprocal agreements

Transparent allocation of resources

Progress: Preliminary Workload Staffing Model (WSM) revealed

Next Steps: Determine Port-level details on allocation of staff and 

tasks

Appropriate level of funding from Congress

Progress: FY14 funding still unclear, FY15 budget process beginning

6
Airport/Airline Coalition: Long-Term 

Goals

Cost-based user-fee study

Multiple options for primary inspection

Larger share of trusted travelers 

Future facility design reflecting new processes 

7
Questions?

For comments or questions, please contact:

Debby McElroy

ACI-NA

Phone: 202-293-8500

Email: dmcelroy@aci-na.org

Sharon Pinkerton 

A4A 

Phone: 202-626-4000

Email: spinkerton@airlines.org

www.aci-na.org 8
# C_2014052EN.01004201.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/42

---

Action brought on 17 December 2013 — Unibail Management v OHIM (Representation of two lines and four stars)

(Case T-686/13)

2014/C 52/80

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unibail Management (Paris, France) (represented by L. Bénard, A. Rudoni, O. Klimis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in part the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2013 in Case R 300/2013-2 in so far as the registration of Community mark No 10 940 161 for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42 was refused; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2013 in Case R 300/2013-2 in so far as the registration of Community mark No 10 940 161 for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42 was refused;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark composed of four five-pointed stars, preceded and followed by a horizontal line for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 10 940 161

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application for registration

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), read in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 75, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-6474.

#### Ronald Jackson, Petitioner v. People of October 19-20, 1994.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 607,

178 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8937.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. D-2522.

#### In the Matter of Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr.

562 U.S. 1089, 131 S. Ct. 816,

178 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9543.

December 6, 2010.

It having been reported that Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr., of Bethesda, Maryland, had died, the Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 4, 2010, is discharged.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20929 

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACK P. KIRBY, III,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-306-4

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jack P. Kirby, III, appeals following his guilty-plea

conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute

methamphetamine, alleging that the district court erred in not

giving him a downward adjustment as a minor participant under

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Our review of the record and the arguments and

authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed.

In light of the extent of Kirby’s involvement in the conspiracy,
No. 96-20929

-2-

the district court did not clearly err in finding that minorparticipant status was not warranted. See United States v.

Thomas, 932 F.2d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir. 1992). 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016419EN.01000601.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Barlis 06 — Investimentos Imobiliários e Turísticos SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-516/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 178(a) - Right of deduction - Conditions of exercise - Article 226(6) and (7) - Details required in invoices - Extent and nature of the services rendered - Date on which the supply of services is made))

(2016/C 419/06)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Barlis 06 — Investimentos Imobiliários e Turísticos SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 226 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that invoices mentioning only ‘legal services rendered from [a date] until the present date’, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, do not a priori comply with the requirements of point 6 of that article and that invoices mentioning only ‘legal services rendered until the present date’ do not a priori comply either with the requirements of point 6 or with those of point 7 of that article, which is, however, for the referring tribunal to ascertain.

Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as precluding the national tax authorities from refusing the right to deduct value added tax solely because the taxable person holds an invoice which does not satisfy the conditions required by Article 226(6) and (7) of that directive, even though those authorities have available all the necessary information for ascertaining whether the substantive conditions for the exercise of that right are satisfied.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

1

---
# C_2016402EN.01002702.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — ENAC v INEA

(Case T-695/13) (1)

1

((Financial aid - Projects of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Realisation of a study for the intermodal development of Bergamo-Orio al Serio Airport - Determination of the final amount of the financial aid - Ineligible costs - Error of law - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 402/29)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC) (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Palmieri and P. Garofoli, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo, D. Silhol and Z. Szilvássy, acting as Agents, and by M. Merola, M. C. Santacroce and L. Armati, lawyers)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) (Grassobbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Muscardini, G. Greco and G. Carullo, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the letters of 18 March and 23 October 2013 of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-TEA), now INEA, relating to certain costs incurred on the occasion of the completion of a feasibility study for the intermodal nature of the Bergame-Orio al Serio airport (Italy) following the financial assistance granted by the European Commission to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC, the National civil aviation authority, Italy) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC, the National civil aviation authority, Italy) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 10, 2023

NO. 03-23-00330-CV

J. A., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 10, 2023. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 10-7122.

#### Tony Fore, Petitioner v. Lakeside Buses of Wisconsin, Inc.

562 U.S. 1145, 131 S. Ct. 919,

178 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 603,

reh den 562

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 478.
EXHIBIT 31.01CERTIFICATIONSI, C. Stanley Bailey, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The BancCorporation;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 17, 2006      By: /s/ C. Stanley Bailey         C. Stanley Bailey