alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014315EN.01007302.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/73

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 8 July 2014 — Morgan v OHIM

(Case F-26/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Reports procedure - Appraisal report - Application for annulment of the appraisal report))

2014/C 315/123

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rhys Morgan (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Faedo, Agent, then M. Paolacci, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the applicant’s appraisal report in respect of the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 and an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Mr Morgan is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Mr Morgan is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 56.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of CHRISTINEAXSMITH PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM RETIRED STATUS

PER CURIAM : : : : : : : No. 114 DB 2013 (No.54 RST 2014) Attorney Registration No. 61718 (OutofState) O R D E R

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2014, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated August 13, 2014, is approved and it is ORDERED that Christine Axsmith,who has been on Retired Status, has never been suspended or disbarred,and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications,competency and learning in law required foradmission to practice in the Commonwealth,shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
# C_2013141EN.01002301.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/23

---

Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Lardini v OHIM (Representation of a flower)

(Case T-131/13)

2013/C 141/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lardini Srl (Filottrano, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 in Case R 2578/2011-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 in Case R 2578/2011-1; and

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings in their entirety, including the costs incurred during the appeal procedure in Case R 2578/2011-1 |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings in their entirety, including the costs incurred during the appeal procedure in Case R 2578/2011-1

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Position mark in the form of a flower for goods in Class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
  
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families
[Program Announcement No. ACF/ACYF/CB-98-04A]


Announcement of the Availability of Financial Assistance and 
Request for Applications to Support Demonstration Projects Under the 
Adoption Opportunities Program

AGENCY: Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), ACF, 
DHHS.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the Notice of an Announcement published 
in the Federal Register on June 9, 1998 (63 FR 31502) by correcting the 
category of eligible applicants under Priority Area 98.3--Achieving 
Increased Placements of Children in Foster Care. For this priority area 
only State agencies are eligible to compete for funds. Under section 
203(d)(1) of Title II of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 
as amended, Pub. L. 104-235, states that the Secretary ``shall make 
grants for improving State efforts to increase the placement of foster 
children legally free for adoption * * *. Additionally, states are 
encouraged to collaborate with private, non-profit agencies and Indian 
tribes to increase the number of adoptions or permanent placements of 
children who are in foster care.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF) Operations 
Center, 1225 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 415, Arlington, Virginia 
22201, the telephone number is 1-800-351-2293.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 9, 1998, the Administration on 
Children, Youth and Families published the Notice of Announcement 
Number: CB-98-04 in the Federal Register soliciting proposals to 
support demonstration projects under the Adoption Opportunities 
Program. The eligibility should have been limited to State social 
service agencies. This amendment corrects that error. Further, the 
Children's Bureau encourages states to develop collaborate agreements 
with private, non-profit agencies and Indian tribes to increase the 
number of adoptions or permanent placements of children who are in 
foster care. All other requirements for mailed applications/overnight/
express mail service and hand-delivered applications/applicant couriers 
remain the same as in the original announcement.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 93.652, 
Adoption Opportunities Program)

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
James A. Harrell,
Deputy Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 98-17313 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
# C_2015146EN.01001001.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/10

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta — Italy) — Equitalia Nord SpA v CLR di Camelliti Serafino & C. Snc

(Case C-68/14) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 106 TFEU and 107 TFEU - Competition - Concept of ‘State aid’ - National legislation - Use of buildings for institutional purposes - Rent reduction - Factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Need for a reply to the questions referred - Lack of information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 146/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Aosta

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Equitalia Nord SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: CLR di Camelliti Serafino & C. Snc

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta (Italy), by decision of 12 December 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/    MURRAY NICOL                                    
|Murray Nicol Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 12, 2004
No. 10-7609.

#### Erasmo Contreras-Aguinaga, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1156, 131 S. Ct. 953,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 234.

178 L. Ed. 2d 786,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 324.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2332** 

MARGE IANNUCCI , Plaintiff

– Appellant , and
MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI , Plaintiff ,

v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00281

- MR

- DLH )

Submitted : February 26, 2013 Decided: Fe bruary 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Marge Iannucci appeals the district court ’s order entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . She also appeals the order c ompel ling discovery and entering a confidentiality order
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp. , No. 1:11

- cv - 00281

- MR

- DLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012) . We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-7051.

#### Alice O’Donnell, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 803,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9514.

178 L. Ed. 2d 537,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.

Same case below, 203 N.J. 160, 1 A.3d 604.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.14 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.14 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.14 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.14 MB)
 
 Pride Month 2024 Auditorium DM952 Hylton BG Gail Atkins [EEO]
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2016007EN.01002102.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Government of Malaysia v OHIM — Vergamini (HALAL MALAYSIA)

(Case T-508/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark HALAL MALAYSIA - Earlier unregistered figurative mark HALAL MALAYSIA - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of rights to the earlier sign having been acquired in accordance with the law of the Member State before the date of application for registration of the Community trade mark - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Use of the earlier mark as a label - Common-law action for passing off - Lack of goodwill))

(2016/C 007/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Government of Malaysia (represented by: initially R. Volterra, Solicitor, R. Miller, Barrister, V. von Bomhard and T. Heitmann, lawyers, then R. Volterra, R. Miller and V. von Bomhard)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Paola Vergamini (Castelnuovo di Garfagnana, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 (Case R 326/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between the Government of Malaysia and Ms Paola Vergamini.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Government of Malaysia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Government of Malaysia to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 25, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 25, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A1885. TRIDATUM SOLUTIONS INCORPORATED v. SOFTWARE ONE, INC..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
World TB Day

March 24
No. 10-6969.

#### Billy Williams, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 911,

178 L. Ed. 2d 762,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 598.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Exhibit
23.1




















Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors
  Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.:
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-139678) on Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries
(the Company) of our reports dated April 16, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of February 1, 2009 and
February 3, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended February 1, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of February 1, 2009, which reports appear in
the February 1, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of the
Company.
  The audit
report on the consolidated financial statements of the Duckwall-ALCO Stores,
Inc. referred to above contains an explanatory paragraph stating that, as
discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January
29, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes.  As discussed in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements, effective January 30, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value method of accounting for share-based compensation as required by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment and
adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements.




/s/ 
KPMG LLP




Kansas
City, Missouri


April 16,
2009
No. 10-7367.

#### G. Saif Sabree, Petitioner v. Maureen E. Walsh, et al.

562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 938,

178 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 62.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 10-7441.

#### Arturo Solis, Petitioner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

562 U.S. 1130, 131 S. Ct. 979,

178 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 552.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth Circuit, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/s/    STUART GRAYSTON                               
|                                                     
|Stuart Grayston President and Chief Executive Officer



February 3, 2004
No. 10-209.

#### Blaine Lafler, Petitioner v. Anthony Cooper.

562 U.S. 1127, 131 S. Ct. 856,

178 L. Ed. 2d 622,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 10.

January 7, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 563.
No. 09-10655.

#### Kurby Decker, Petitioner v. Chequita Dunbar, et al.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 980,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 507.

178 L. Ed. 2d 808,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 848, 131 S. Ct. 96, 178 L. Ed. 2d 60, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6001.