alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

9th Floor, L&C Annex 

401 Church Street 

Nashville, TN 37243 

Apn124,2008 CERTIFIED MAIL 7004 0550 0000 9791 1895 

RECEIPT REQUESTED 

J. I. Palmer, Jr. 

Regional Administrator 

US EPA, Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center, 1 2th Floor 

6 1 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3 104 

RE: Regional Haze Rule (RHR) State Implementation Plan for the Tennessee Class I Areas - Hard 

Copies 

Dear Mr. Palmer; 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed follow-up Hard Copies of the RHR State Implementation Plan for the 

Tennessee Class I Areas to the attention of Ms. Lynorae Benjamin. The original submittal was sent in a 

CD format on April 4, 2008. This submittal fulfills the requirements of the Regional Haze 

Implementation Rule (40 CFR 51.308) and Section 169B of the Federal Clean Air Act. The 

Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally 

approved State Implementation Plan. 

We have worked closely with your staff throughout the process and greatly appreciate their timely efforts 

and consideration regarding this matter. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (615) 532- 

0554. 

Sincerely, 

Director 

Enclosures 

cc: Beverly Banister, EPA Region IV (Letter only) 

Lynorae Benjamin, EPA Region IV (Letter and Hard Copies) 

James Hou, EPA Region IV (Letter only) 

Dick Schutt, EPA Region IV (Letter only)
No. 10-7282.

#### Anthony G. Bailey, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

562 U.S. 1150, 131 S. Ct. 931,

178 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 127.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 763.
No. 10-7200.

#### James Franklin Pipes, Petitioner v. Correctional Medical Services, et al.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 926,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 346.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 290.
Exhibit 32  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: August 21, 2006 /S/Kenneth J. Eaken Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
No. 10-414.

#### Neldon Johnson, Petitioner v. Ina Marie Johnson.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 656,

178 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9176.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Utah denied.

Same case below, 234 P.3d 1100.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2726 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2726

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 
                                trains.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banning Smoking on Amtrak Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING ON AMTRAK TRAINS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains
    ``(a) Prohibition.--Beginning on the date of enactment of the 
Banning Smoking on Amtrak Act of 2019, Amtrak shall prohibit smoking on 
board Amtrak trains.
    ``(b) Electronic Cigarettes.--
            ``(1) Inclusion.--The use of an electronic cigarette shall 
        be treated as smoking for purposes of this section.
            ``(2) Electronic cigarette defined.--In this section, the 
        term `electronic cigarette' means a device that delivers 
        nicotine or other substances to a user of the device in the 
        form of a vapor that is inhaled to simulate the experience of 
        smoking.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 243 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``24323. Prohibition on smoking on Amtrak trains.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2726

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on Amtrak 
                                trains.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1996
<CASH>                                      41,794,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               81,225,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,051,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 95,012,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           238,121,000
<PP&E>                                     578,704,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             116,896,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             873,747,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      130,415,000
<BONDS>                                    521,179,000
<COMMON>                                       145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  96,195,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               873,747,000
<SALES>                                    651,356,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           651,356,000
<CGS>                                      488,244,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              488,244,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               659,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          58,565,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,382,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (6,700,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,682,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,682,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-7296.

#### Joaquin Mario Valencia-Trujillo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 682,

178 L. Ed. 2d 507,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9168.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 936.
# Teamwork and experience power Navy’s nuclear supply chain

/ Published April 20, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
After more than 26 years at Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime in Columbus, Joe Moore has learned the value in giving the customer what they want.

In Moore’s case, that customer is the U.S. Navy.

As a weapon system support manager, Moore ensures nuclear powered ships and submarines have the parts they need to safely conduct their missions. That’s no easy task, considering the nuclear reactor parts list Moore manages includes more than 31,000 items.

“We’re responsible for parts that are integral to the ability of a nuclear reactor to function properly on a ship,” Moore said. “In order for those ships to safely sail and accomplish their mission, we need to make sure we can provide the parts the Navy needs.”

In some cases, the failure of just one part can force a submarine to remain in dry dock for weeks. Moore’s job involves more than just providing his customers with essential parts – he’s also responsible for monitoring the efficacy of those parts long after their sale.

“In the past, suppliers would only develop a concept for a weapon system then field the necessary parts, and that was the end of it.” Moore said. “Now, we provide direct customer support throughout the life cycle of those weapon systems because we have tools in place which allow us to do that."

Overseeing total life cycle logistics for that many parts takes a lot of work, and Moore credits a robust support network with his success.

"Here in Columbus we have the Maritime Supplier Operations group which has a dedicated team of materiel planners, buyers, and product specialists that I depend on to help resolve any issues that may come up during the day,” Moore said.

As a part of the customer facing side of weapon system support management, Moore also works directly with military customers. He says it has given him a much better understanding and appreciation for the needs of the Warfighter and the importance of his own mission at DLA.

That mission has kept Moore busy for more than two decades, working each day to give the customers what they want.

Joe Moore is featured in a weekly video series titled “I am an Acquisition Professional”. Each week a new video highlights the diversity of the DLA acquisition community covering 14 areas of expertise.

To view his video and others in the Acquisition Professional series, visit DLA’s Facebook page or YouTube page.
202366734 6 OSTW85-121-XEWCP2 4 09:40:31a.m . 10 - 

### S10-101007-00 8 

# dungres aa i i\} e Huitv i State s Hlasifhiytoii , JD(

E l'0;"il 3
3—< - o;^ " .-:e: ) Wednesday , October

6 , 201 0 ^ > ^

*-^— ] i -^ ^ Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d > ^§— ' Secretar y _ o o^ ^ Departmen

t o f Transportatio n ^ ^ ' 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E ^ ,_ P Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr . Secretary : W e ar e writin g t

o expres s our

suppor t fo r SonomaCounty' s grant

applicatio n to th e Department o f Transportation' s Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Gran

t Program . Thi s fundin g wil l help launc h amarketin g campaig n to stimulate in-boun d ai r trave l fro mthre e majo

r markets : Seattle , Portland , an

d Lo s Angeles . I t i s ou r understandin g tha

t th e increase d touris mfacilitate d b y thi s progra mwil l hav e a

n $1 1 millio n increas e in visito r

spendin g i n ou r

loca l community , [

t woul d provid e amuc h neede d boos t t o loca l touris man d visito r

bureaus , hotels , ca

r rentals , and airlin e companie s i n a n are a buil t around atouris t

economy . W e urg e yo u to giv e thi s proposa

l your ful l an d carefu l consideration . I

f yo u hav e any question s o r comments , pleas e d o no t

hesitat e t o contac t

Chri s Roger s in Congresswoma n Woolsey' s offic e a t (707 ) 542-718 2 o r

Ti mDaly in Congressma

n Thompson' s offic e a

t (202 ) 226-7367 . We than k yo u fo r you r time an d attentio n o n thi s matter . Sincerely , Lyn A Woolsey Q Mik e Thompso n Membe r o f Congres s Membe r o f Congres s LW:cj r

i'>!..";i•:•_ • -.V i M crf. i i.r

- PAPf n
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00657-CV

EX PARTE Demond Depree BLUNSTON

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CVK-001377 D2

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

SIGNED July 24, 2013.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
No. 10-5756.

#### Uiese Mausali, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 342,

178 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7399.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 1077.
No. 09-11164.

#### Veronica R. Pearson, Petitioner v. Danny Brace, et al.

562 U.S. 865, 131 S. Ct. 149,

178 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6492,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 743.
No. 10-5926.

#### Antoine Boyce, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1066, 131 S. Ct. 643,

178 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9384.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 346.
#### IN THE MATTER OF DARYL V. YOKELY.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 844)

(407 SE2d 745)

Decided September 5, 1991.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Cynthia C. Hinrichs, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of *522Georgia.

*521Per curiam.

Respondent Daryl V. Yokely has petitioned for voluntary discipline. His petition is based upon his admission that his actions in withdrawing attorney fees from his escrow account and depositing them into his operating account while there was a dispute between him and his client concerning the amount of a settlement respondent had negotiated on the client’s behalf constituted conduct in violation of Standard 65 of State Bar Rule 4-102.

Respondent, in his petition, requests that this Court accept his request for voluntary discipline in the form of a Review Panel Reprimand.

Based upon the record, including a finding that respondent has offered his client a certified check for the full amount of the settlement, and the recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Bar Disciplinary Board, it is directed that respondent receive a Review Panel reprimand.

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2013123EN.01002002.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/20

---

Action brought on 21 February 2013 — Laboratoires Polive/OHIM — Arbora & Ausonia (dodie)

(Case T-123/13)

2013/C 123/34

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratoires Polive (Levallois Perret, France) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Arbora & Ausonia, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision rendered by the second Board of Appeal on 28 November 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision rendered by the second Board of Appeal on 28 November 2012;

| — | Order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘dodie’, for goods in classes 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 18, 21, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark application No 9 037 821

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish and Portuguese trade marks of the word mark ‘DODOT’ for goods in classes 3, 5, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 44

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision, upheld the opposition and rejected the trade mark applied for in relation to certain goods in classes 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 16, 18, 21, 25 and 28

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2016296EN.01000502.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai törvényszék — Hungary) — Eurospeed Ltd v Szegedi törvényszék

(Case C-287/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Road transport - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Driver’s liability for infringements of the obligation to use a tachograph))

(2016/C 296/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Gyulai törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eurospeed Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Szegedi törvényszék

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, instead of or in addition to the transport undertaking employing the driver, holds the driver liable for infringements of that regulation which he has himself committed.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
# DLA Distribution Bahrain welcomes new commander

/ Published May 26, 2016
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
Navy Supply Corps Cmdr. Erik R. Naley, assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Bahrain, Southwest Asia, in a ceremony May 26.  The ceremony was officiated by Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Bahrain commander, Navy Supply Corps Capt. Sean M. Egge.

A native of Minnetonka, Minn., Naley was commissioned through the Navy Officer Candidate School in May 1998.  Following Supply Officer Basic Qualification Course, he was assigned to the submarine USS Providence as the supply officer.  While onboard the Providence he deployed to the Mediterranean and Persian Gulf where he participated in the opening days of Operation Enduring Freedom.

Naley next served as the warehouse budget officer for Naval Special Warfare Group One, Logistics Support Unit.  His next assignment was to the submarine support ship USS Frank Cable located in Agana, Guam, as the principal assistant for Logistics.  He supported the stand up of Fleet Logistics Support Center Yokosuka Detachment Guam serving as its first director, Logistics Support Center.

In 2006, Naley attended the Naval Postgraduate School where he earned a Master of Business Administration with a focus in financial management, graduating with distinction and receiving the Conrad Scholar designation.

Following graduate school, he reported to Naval Air Systems Command where he served as a business financial manager supporting the program executive officer.  In 2010, Naley deployed to Iraq serving as an advisor to an Iraqi general officer directing Iraqi depot operations.  He then served on the US Africa Command J4 Staff as executive officer to the J4 and as the chief, Joint Logistics Operations Center, where he served as lead logistics planner in numerous named operations.

Prior to assuming his current position, he served as the Material Budget division director at Naval Supply Systems Command.  As division director, he was responsible for over $7 billion of annual obligation authority and an inventory valued at $27 billion.

His decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Commendation Medal, the Joint Service Achievement Medal, the Navy Achievement Medal and various campaign medals and ribbons.  He is a Joint Qualified Officer, a member of the Defense Acquisition Corps, certified DAWIA Level III in Business Financial Management, certified Level II in Defense Financial Management, and a Certified Defense Financial Manager.
No. 10-7524.

#### Michael Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1118, 131 S. Ct. 846,

178 L. Ed. 2d 574,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9650.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 359.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: August 20, 2004       /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 10-6519.

#### Devin Harmon, Petitioner v. Martin Marshal, et al.

562 U.S. 1067, 131 S. Ct. 649,

178 L. Ed. 2d 487,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9226.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 632.
No. 10-7001.

#### Ruby Sue Browder, Petitioner v. The CBE Group Inc. Litigation Center, et al.

562 U.S. 1113, 131 S. Ct. 831,

178 L. Ed. 2d 565,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9714.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*566Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 591.
No. 10-716.

#### Amy Maldonado, Petitioner v. LogLogic, Inc.

562 U.S. 1140, 131 S. Ct. 963,

178 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 576.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 9.
# C_2014175EN.01005203.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/52

---

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2014 — Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology v Commission

(Case T-146/13) (1)

1

2014/C 175/73

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27. 4. 2013.

1

---