alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35296-35297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Plant License Renewal; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting 
on July 16, 1998, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Thursday, July 16, 1998--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business

    The Subcommittee will discuss the NRC staff's activities associated 
with license renewal, proposed staff's plans and schedule for reviewing 
the license renewal application and related safety issues. The 
Subcommittee will also discuss the ACRS involvement in reviewing the 
license renewal submittal and related matters. The purpose of this 
meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, 
and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for 
deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will

[[Page 35297]]

be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to 
the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, its consultants, and 
other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Dr. Medhat El-Zeftawy (telephone 301/415-6889) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the 
proposed agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-17220 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 09-11361.

#### Timothy Lee York, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 876, 131 S. Ct. 185,

178 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6529.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 347.
# C_2015381EN.01005703.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/57

---

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffè KIMBO)

(Case T-637/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner

* * v. * Misc. Docket AG * No. 23 BARRY JOHN NACE * September Term, 2014 * Respondent *

***************************************

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing, under Rule 16-773, of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of a mandate entered October 25, 2013 and opinion filed March 28, 2013 whereby the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia ordered the suspension of the Respondent from practicing law in West Virginia for a period of 120 days, commencing on October 25, 2013; and

WHEREAS, this Court having issued a show cause order requesting the parties to show cause, in writing, why corresponding discipline should not be imposed by this Court and responses having been filed thereto by Bar Counsel and Respondent, it is this 28th day of August, 2014

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring,

that Barry John Nace be, and he is hereby, suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of 120 days, commencing nunc pro tunc on October 25, 2013, the date the Respondent was suspended by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, and ending on February 22, 2014, and it is furtherORDERED, that the period of suspension having expired and Respondent having, under

oath, swore that he did not practice law in Maryland during this period, Respondent is hereby reinstated to the Bar of Maryland, nunc pro tunc , as of February 22, 2014, and it is further

ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 16-723 (e), the Clerk of this Court shall notify the required authorities of said sanction of Respondent.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17046]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation.

SUBJECT: Board of Directors.

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Saturday, June 20, 1998.

PLACE: Telephonic meeting.

STATUS: This meeting was canceled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Stuckle at 301/564-3399.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17046 Filed 6-23-98; 9:43 am]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16908]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Licensing of Private Remote-Sensing Space Systems.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0174.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 96 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 6.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 16 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Title II of the Land Remote Sensing Act of 1992 
requires that anyone who operates a private remote-sensing space system 
must obtain a license. The information provided in the application is 
used by NOAA to determine if U.S. security and international 
obligations are protected. Although NOAA is working on revising the 
implementing regulations, the current requirements need to remain in 
force until the revised requirements take effect.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20503.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Office, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-16908 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Brochu, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date of the financial
statements contained therein. /s/ Michael A. Brochu
Michael A. Brochu
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2005
CS250066A

There are two types of TB conditions:

TB disease and latent TB infection. 

 of people in the U.S. have 

 Without treatment, they are at 

risk for developing 

To learn more about TB, visit 

www.cdc.gov/tb

People with do not 

feel sick, do not have symptoms, and 

cannot spread TB germs to others.

 

But, if their TB germs become active, 

they can develop 

People with are sick 

from active TB germs. They 

TB disease

usually have symptoms and may 

spread TB germs to others.
# C_2013171EN.01003503.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/35

---

Action brought on 22 April 2013 — Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte v Commission

(Case T-223/13)

2013/C 171/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (Minden, Germany) (represented by: H. Weil, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds to the examples of products constituting packaging ‘rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material (e.g. plastic film, aluminium, paper) is wound’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds to the examples of products constituting packaging ‘rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material (e.g. plastic film, aluminium, paper) is wound’;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to the first five pleas in law relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission.

---
No. 10-524.

#### Ronald D. Morgan, Petitioner v. Town of Mineral, Virginia.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 831,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9769,

178 L. Ed. 2d 558,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to
his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2009




                                       /S/ DAVID C. KAHN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       DAVID C. KAHN
                                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35564-35565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


California Coast Province Advisory Committee (PAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Coast Province Advisory Committee (PAC) will 
meet on July 16 and 17, 1998, at the Pt. Reyes National Seashore 
Administration Building Main Conference Room in Olema, CA. The meeting 
will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. July 16 and 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m. July 17. The Pt. Reyes National Seashore Administration Building 
is located at #1 Bear Valley Road in Olema. Agenda items to be covered 
include: (1) Status of 2 PAC letters; (2) Status of Aquatic/Riparian 
Monitoring Team; (3) New National

[[Page 35565]]

Wildland Fire Policy as it relates to air quality; (4) Field trip at 
the Pt. Reyes National Seashore; (5) Subcommittee reports and 
recommendations (Coho, Public/Private/Tribal Partnership Opportunities, 
Work on the Ground, Recreation/Tourism, PAC/Scert, Monitoring); (6) 
Agencies' feedback on implementing the Coho Subcommittee roads 
resolution; (7) Joint 3 PAC meeting follow-up on priority action items 
identified at the May 28-29 PAC meeting; (8) PAC updates; and (9) Open 
public forum. All California Coast Province Advisory Committee meetings 
are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Daniel Chisholm, USDA, Forest Supervisor, Mendocino National 
Forest, 825 N. Humboldt Avenue, Willows, CA 95988, (530) 934-3316 or 
Phebe Brown, Province Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, 825 
N. Humboldt Avenue, Willows, CA 95988, (530) 934-3316.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Daniel K. Chisholm,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-17282 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35297-35298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Certification Regarding Rights to 
Unemployment Benefits.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: UI-45.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0079.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 9/30/1998.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other for 
profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 1,950.
    (8) Total annual responses: 2,900.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 487.
    (10) Collection description: In administering the disqualification 
for the voluntary leaving of work provision of Section 4 of the 
Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, the Railroad Retirement Board 
investigates an unemployment claim that indicates the claimant left 
voluntarily. The certification obtains information needed to determine 
if the leaving was for good cause.

[[Page 35298]]

Additional Information or Comments

    Copies of the form and supporting documents can be obtained from 
Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments 
regarding the information collection should be addressed to Ronald J. 
Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17230 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LE XIANG CHEN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10558

D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00008-RVM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands

Ramona V. Manglona, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Le Xiang Chen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of

methamphetamine near a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C),

and 860. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Chen’s counsel

FILED

JAN 25 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Chen the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 

2 14-10558
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2685 

To amend the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992 to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal years 2020 through 2025, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2019 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992 to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2020 through 2025, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Bird Conserva5 tion Reauthorization Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2685 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE WILD BIRD CONSERVA2 TION ACT. 

3 Section 116 of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 

4 1992 (16 U.S.C. 4915) is amended by striking ‘‘each of 

5 the fiscal years 1993, 1994, and 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘fis6 cal years 2020 through 2025’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of New York State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc., Petitioner, v Celeste W. Tripi, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 883]

— Executive Law § 298 proceeding transferred to this Court by an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Sedita, Jr., J.), entered June 11, 2003, to enforce an order, dated August 5, 2002, of the *1361Commissioner of petitioner, New York State Division of Human Rights.

It is hereby ordered that the amended petition be and the same hereby is unanimously granted without costs.

Memorandum: In this housing discrimination proceeding, Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. (HOME) and respondent entered into a stipulation of settlement during a hearing on the complaint of HOME. The Commissioner of petitioner, New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR), issued an order (final order) incorporating the terms of that settlement. Over three years later, a compliance hearing was held to determine whether the parties had complied with the final order. The Commissioner issued an order following the compliance hearing (compliance order) determining that HOME had reasonably complied with the final order but that respondent had not. The Commissioner ordered respondent to comply with the final order, including payment of $2,500 with interest. SDHR commenced this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to enforce the compliance order, and Supreme Court transferred the proceeding to this Court. Respondent failed to answer the petition or amended petition.

Upon our review of the Commissioner’s determinations *(see generally Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Bystricky,*30 NY2d 322 [1972]), we grant the amended petition for enforcement of the compliance order. Respondent assented to the terms of the settlement during the public hearing and with the advice of counsel. “[T]he record is barren of any evidence of fraud, overreaching, mistake, or duress” *(Matter of Stefanis v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*244 AD2d 342, 342 [1997]). The Commissioner’s determination after the compliance hearing that respondent failed to comply with the terms of the settlement, as incorporated in the final order, is supported by substantial evidence *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.