alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16926]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (1766).
    Dates: July 27-29, 1998 and August 3-5, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1235.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mike McCloskey, Program Director, Division of 
Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 995, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1732.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Knowledge and Distributed Intelligence (KDI) Program Solicitation as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c) (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-16926 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Committee of State Foresters

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee of State Foresters will meet in Washington, 
D.C., on August 4, 1998, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. The Committee is 
comprised of the seven members of the Executive Committee of the 
National Association of State Foresters. The purpose of the meeting is 
for the Committee to consult with the Secretary of Agriculture 
regarding the administration and application of various portions of the 
Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. The Chief of the Forest 
Service will chair this meeting, which is open to public attendance; 
however, participation is limited to Forest Service personnel and 
Committee members. Persons who wish to bring cooperative forestry 
matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements 
with the Executive Secretary of the Committee before or after the 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Williamsburg Room (104-A) of 
the Jamie L. Whitten Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 12th & 
Jefferson Drive, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250.
    Send written comments to Phil Janik, Executive Secretary, Committee 
of State Foresters, c/o Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 96090, 
Washington, D.C. 20090-6090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerilyn Levi, Office of the Deputy 
Chief for State and Private Forestry, (202) 205-1041.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Janice H. McDougle,
Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private Forestry.
[FR Doc. 98-15426 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated March 19, 1999
accompanying  the financial  statements of Earth  Sciences,  Inc.,  which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Earth Sciences,
Inc., to Form S-3 Registration Statement  declared effective July 23, 1997, File
No. 333-25465,  Form S-3 Registration Statement declared effective September 22,
1997, File No. 333-35135, and Form S-3 Registration Statement declared effective
February 25, 1998, File No. 333-46199 of Earth Sciences,  Inc. and to the use of
our name and the statements  with respect to us, as appearing  under the heading
"Experts" in the Registration Statements.

/s/  Hein + Associates LLP
HEIN + ASSOCIATES

Denver, Colorado
March 31, 1999
No. 10-6701.

#### Eugene Wideman, Jr., Petitioner v. Colorado; and Eugene Wideman, Jr., Petitioner v. Amelia Garcia.

562 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 588,

178 L. Ed. 2d 413,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8684.

November 8, 2010.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 29, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 743.
# ‘Tis the season for tree lightings, donating toys and office decorating contests

/ Published Dec. 22, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
The festive spirit is alive and well throughout Defense Logistics Agency Aviation.

Teams of employees at DLA Aviation Jacksonville kicked off the holiday season Dec. 8, by donating more than 420 toys they collected during the Marine Corps Toys for Tots campaign.

Fast forward to Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler flipping the giant switch during the annual Tree Lighting ceremony Dec. 12. The event was held in the first-floor dining area of the DLA Aviation Operations Center (Bldg. 46) on Defense Supply Center Richmond. The event, sponsored by the Civilian Welfare Fund and Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation, featured free snacks, beverages, desserts and a disc jockey spinning holiday tunes.

Finally, employees within the Planning Directorate in Richmond showed their holiday spirit by challenging each other to friendly holiday decorating and gingerbread house making contests. Colorful wreaths, Christmas trees, presents, and fireplaces transformed their workspaces into winter wonderlands. Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli judged the decorating competition, while Planning Director Kent Ennis selected the winner for the best gingerbread house.
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION

July 17, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Denso Meeting with EPA and NHTSA Regarding Proposal for 2017-2025 LightDuty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Arvon L. Mitcham, Program Manager/Engineer

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents meetings held on April 19, 2012 between representatives of Denso, EPA,
and NHTSA to discuss Denso’s comments on the LD GHG proposed rule. The meeting attendees included the following:

Denso : Yoshimichi Nishida, Rob Martin, Tomoya Tohnai, Do ug Patton

EPA : Ed Nam, Arvon Mitcham, Byungho Lee

NHTSA : Greg Powell, Coralie Cooper

The topics discussed included off-cycle credits, cu rrent industry alternator implementation, efficiency levels of current and future alternators , typical vehicle loads, and high efficiency alternator’s place in the off-cycle credit program. Separate meeting materials were prepared and authorized for release by Denso, and are attached t o this memo.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35920-35921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2042-010]


Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County; Notice of 
Offer of Settlement

June 25, 1998.
    On May 14, 1998, the United States Department of the Interior, 
through the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, the Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 
Washington, the Kalispel Tribe of Indians, the Washington State 
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the United States Forest Service 
filed an

[[Page 35921]]

Offer of Settlement which, if approved by the Commission, would resolve 
the pending license amendment application for the Box Canyon Project 
No. 2042, filed by the District on February 18, 1997.
    The matters that would be resolved by the settlement pertain to 
protection, mitigation, or enhancement of resources affected by project 
operations, as well as the Kalispel Indian Reservation and national 
forest lands, and annual charges for the use and occupancy of Indian 
trust lands.
    Anyone may submit comments on the Offer of Settlement in accordance 
with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure pertaining to submission of settlement offers, 18 CFR 
385.602(f), except that the provisions of subsection 602(f)(2) are 
hereby waived to the extent necessary to extend the period for comments 
and reply comments as specified below. Comments must be filed by [the 
20th day following publication of this notice in the Federal Register]; 
must bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS,'' and Project 
No. 2042-010. Reply comments must be filed by [the 30th day following 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register]. Send the comments 
or reply comments (original and 8 copies) to: the Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426. A copy of any comments or reply comments must also be served on 
each representative of the parties to the Offer of Settlement.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17426 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-6739.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1057, 131 S. Ct. 662,

178 L. Ed. 2d 473,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9054.

November 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 127 (Thursday, July 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36285-36286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Amtrak Reform Council; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).


[[Page 36286]]


ACTION: Notice of Amtrak Reform Council meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As provided in Section 203 of the Amtrak Reform and 
Accountability Act of 1997, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 
gives notice of a meeting of the Amtrak Reform Council (``ARC''). The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss a draft of the Council's Charter, 
to receive a briefing from the Department of Transportation's Inspector 
General regarding the independent assessment of Amtrak's financial 
needs, and to take up such other matters as the Council or its members 
deem appropriate.

DATES: The ARC meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST on 
Monday, July 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES:The meeting will be held in Room 235 in the Hall of States at 
444 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC. The meeting is open to 
the public on a first-come, first-served basis and is accessible to 
individuals with disabilities. Persons in need of special arrangements 
should contact the person whose name is listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arrigo Mongini, Deputy Associate 
Administrator for Railroad Development, FRA, RDV-2, Mail Stop 20, 400 
Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590 (mailing address only) or by 
telephone at (202) 632-3286.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ARC was created by the Amtrak Reform and 
Accountability Act of 1997 (ARAA) as an independent commission to 
evaluate Amtrak's performance and make recommendations to Amtrak for 
achieving further cost containment and productivity improvements, and 
financial reforms. In addition, the ARAA requires: that the ARC monitor 
cost savings resulting from work rules established under new agreements 
between Amtrak and its labor unions; that the ARC provide an annual 
report to Congress that includes an assessment of Amtrak's progress on 
the resolution of productivity issues; and that after two years the ARC 
begin to make findings on whether Amtrak can meet certain financial 
goals and, if not, to notify the President and the Congress.
    The ARAA provides that the ARC consist of eleven members, including 
the Secretary of Transportation and ten others nominated by the 
President or Congressional leaders. Each member is to serve a 5 year 
term.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 26, 1998.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Chief, Passenger Programs Division.
[FR Doc. 98-17556 Filed 7-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
No. 10-7143.

#### Curtis Carter, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 674,

178 L. Ed. 2d 501,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9402.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2016118EN.01002301.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Šumelj and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T/546/13, T-108/14 and T-109/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Accession of Croatia to the European Union - Repeal before accession of national legislation providing for the creation of the profession of public enforcement officer - Harm suffered by the persons previously appointed as public enforcement officers - Failure by the Commission to adopt measures ensuring compliance with the accession commitments - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 36 of the Act of Accession))

(2016/C 118/23)

Language of the case: Croatian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ante Šumelj (Zagreb, Croatia), Dubravka Bašljan (Zagreb), Đurđica Crnčević (Sv. Ivan Zeline, Croatia), Miroslav Lovreković (Križevaci, Croatia) (Case T-546/13); Drago Burazer (Zagreb), Nikolina Nežić (Zagreb), Blaženka Bošnjak (Sv. Ivan Zeline), Bosiljka Grbašić (Križevaci), Tea Tončić (Pula, Croatia), Milica Bjelić (Dubrovnik, Croatia), Marijana Kruhoberec (Varaždin, Croatia) (Case T-108/14); Davor Škugor (Sisak, Croatia), Ivan Gerometa (Vrsar, Croatia), Kristina Samardžić (Split, Croatia), Sandra Cindrić (Karlovac, Croatia), Sunčica Gložinić (Varaždin), Tomislav Polić (Kaštel Novi, Croatia) and Vlatka Pižeta (Varaždin) (Case T-109/14) (represented by: M. Krmek, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Ćutuk and G. Wils and, in Cases T-546/13 and T-108/14, S. Ječmenica, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants following the failure by the Commission to take measures to ensure the Republic of Croatia’s compliance with its accession commitments.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ante Šumelj and the other applicants named in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ante Šumelj and the other applicants named in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.

1

---
# C_2015073EN.01002702.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 — Aic v OHIM — ACV Manufacturing (Heat exchanger inserts)

(Case T-617/13) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a heat exchanger insert - Ground for invalidity - Lack of visibility of part of a complex product - Article 4(2) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2015/C 073/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aic S.A. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, Legal Adviser)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ACV Manufacturing (Seneffe, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2013 (Case R 688/2012-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between ACV Manufacturing and Aic S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Aic S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

---
#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES E. BOSWELL.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 846)

(407 SE2d 759)

Per curiam.

James Elton Boswell stole several checks from the law firm where he worked and forged the signature of a senior partner. He was arrested when he tried to cash the checks. He pled guilty in the Superior Court of Fulton County to two counts of first degree forgery and two counts of second degree forgery, which are felonies under OCGA §§ 16-9-1 and 16-9-2. The State Bar filed a formal complaint against Boswell and appointed a special master to conduct further proceedings.

After a hearing the special master made findings of fact and concluded that Boswell’s conduct violated Standard 66 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The special master recommended disbarment. We agree with the recommendation and hereby order James Elton Boswell disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

*All the Justices concur.*

*540Decided September 6, 1991.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.
**Exhibit 23.2**
**Consent of Independent Auditors**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos.33-44551, 33-56289, 33-64317, 333-46615, 333-59790, 333-65822, 333-75539, 333-75541, 333-75543,333-91613) of R.H. Donnelley Corporation of our report dated January 31, 2003, with respect to thecombined consolidated financial statements of the directory publishing operations of SprintCorporation (Sprint Publishing & Advertising) for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in R.H.Donnelley Corporation’s Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
#### John Doe, Appellant, v New York City Police Department et al., Respondents.

[67 NYS3d 168]

*519Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered April 27, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, partially denied plaintiff’s motion to compel certain discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff, a former New York City Police Officer seeks to recover damages arising from alleged harassment on the job due to his sexual orientation. Plaintiff demanded a further deposition of one of his coworkers, a police officer, and disclosure of the disciplinary files of that officer and another employee of the police department.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs requests for additional discovery *(see Ulico Cas. Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,*1 AD3d 223, 224 [1st Dept 2003]). During discovery, plaintiff’s counsel battered the witness, a nonparty female officer, with questions that were so “grossly irrelevant” and “improper” that they were not required to be answered *(White v Martins,*100 AD2d 805, 805 [1st Dept 1984]).

The police officer’s disciplinary files are protected by Civil Rights Law § 50-a *(and see Espady v City of New York,*40 AD3d 475, 476 [1st Dept 2007]), and plaintiff failed to provide a clear showing of facts sufficient to warrant even an in camera review of those records *(see id.', see also Flores v City of New York,*207 AD2d 302, 303 [1st Dept 1994]; Civil Rights Law § 50-a [2]).

Discovery of the disciplinary file of the other police department employee was not warranted, as she was not similarly situated with plaintiff and thus is not comparable for the purpose of showing discrimination *(see Carryl v MacKay Shields, LLC,*93 AD3d 589, 590 [1st Dept 2012]; *Beckles v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. Ctr.,*36 AD3d 733, 734 [2d Dept 2007]).

Concur—Friedman, J.R, Kahn, Gesmer, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
# C_2013101EN.01002101.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/21

---

Action brought on 25 January 2013 — Cezar/OHIM — Poli-Eco (Skirting boards)

(Case T-39/13)

2013/C 101/45

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cezar Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjne Dariusz Bogdan Niewiński (Ełk, Poland) (represented by: M. Nentwig and G. Becker, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Poli-Eco Tworzywa Sztuczne sp. z o.o. (Szprotawa, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of November 8, 2012 (case R 1512/2010-3); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of November 8, 2012 (case R 1512/2010-3);

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The trade design ‘skirting boards’ — Registered Community design No 70 438-0002

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The application for a declaration of invalidity was based on a lack of novelty and individual character pursuant to Article 25 (1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4 to 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested RCD invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 25(1)(b), 63(1) and 62(1) of the Council Regulation No 6/2002.

Pleas in law:

---