alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Gary C. Granoff, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 16, 2009/s/ Gary C. Granoff
Gary C. Granoff
Chief Financial Officer
Final - September 29, 2021

PRESIDER/PRESENTER(s)

Dr. Grace Lee (ACIP Chair)

Dr. Melinda Wharton (ACIP Executive Secretary, CDC)

10:20 Tick-borne Encephalitis (TBE) Vaccine

Introduction

Immunogenicity and safety of TBE vaccine

Summary and next steps 

Dr. Kathy Poehling (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Susan Hills (CDC/NCEZID) 

Dr. Susan Hills (CDC/NCEZID) 

11:20 Break

11:25 Zoster Vaccines 

Introduction

Economics of vaccinating immunocompromised 19–49-year-old adults 

against herpes zoster in the US

Preliminary EtR regarding use of RZV in immunocompromised adults and 

next steps 

Dr. Camille Kotton (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Ismael Ortega-Sanchez (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Tara Anderson (CDC/NCIRD)

12:40 Break

12:45 Pneumococcal Vaccines 

Introduction

Summary of economic models assessing pneumococcal vaccines in US 

adults

EtR on risk-based use of PCV15 and PCV20 in adults

Considerations for use of PCV15 and PCV20 in adults and next steps 

Dr. Kathy Poehling (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Andrew Leidner (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Miwako Kobayashi (CDC/NCIRD)

Dr. Miwako Kobayashi (CDC/NCIRD)

2:30 Break

2:35 Public Comment 

2:55 Hepatitis B Vaccines 

Introduction

HepB-CpG postmarketing surveillance study

Universal adult HepB: EtR 

Dr. Kevin Ault (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Katia Bruxvoort (Kaiser Permanente Southern California)

Dr. Mona Doshani (CDC/NCHHSTP)

3:55 Break

4:00 Orthopoxviruses Vaccines

Introduction

Background information to interpret GRADE tables and Evidence to 

Recommendations fraomeworks about JYNNEOS® (Rao)

Evidence to Recommendations Frameworks for Use of JYNNEOS® 

Dr. Pablo Sanchez (ACIP, WG Chair)

Dr. Agam Rao (CDC/NCEZID)

Dr. Agam Rao (CDC/NCEZID)

5:30 Adjourn

Acronyms

CDC

CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019

EtR Evidence to Recommendations Framework

FDA Food and Drug Administration

GRADE

HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration

IHS Indian Health Service

NCHHSTP

NCIRD

NCEZID

NIAID

OIDP Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy

SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

TBE Tick-borne Encephalitis

WG Work Group

WHO World Health Organization

VE Vaccine Effectiveness

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases [of CDC/OID] 

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases [of CDC/OID]

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

10:00 Welcome & Introductions

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia 30329 

September 29, 2021

page 1 of 1
# Europe distribution center to welcome new deputy

/ Published Aug. 9, 2016
GERMERSHEIM, Germany, 
Crimson R. Smith has been selected as deputy commander of DLA Distribution Europe in Germersheim, Germany.

Previously, Smith was assigned to DLA Distribution headquarters as the Material Movement Division Chief, a position she held for approximately three years.

She began her federal civilian career March 2004 as a Department of the Army intern with the Communications Security Logistics Agency out of Ft. Huachuca, Ariz., performing as a communications electronics command item manager.  

Upon completion of the intern program, she accepted a position within DLA, joining the DLA Distribution Kuwait Southwest Asia Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point operation as a general supply Specialist.  She was promoted to deputy of the TCSP operation in June 2008.  

In December 2008, the TCSP operation and DLA Distribution Kuwait, Southwest Asia, consolidated and she was assigned as the chief of operations and later served as deputy commander of DLA Distribution Kuwait from September 2010 until its closure in December 2012. 

Smith graduated from Central Texas College in Killen, Texas, in December 1992 with an Associate of Arts in General Studies.  She continued her undergraduate studies at the University of Arizona in Tucson where she earned her Bachelor of Arts in Psychology in May 1997.  While employed with United Parcel Service, she attended University of Phoenix, Las Vegas Campus, and in February 2004 received her Master of Arts in Educational Counseling.
# C_2013352EN.01001602.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/16

---

Action brought on 2 September 2013 — GEA Group v OHIM (engineering for a better world)

(Case T-488/13)

2013/C 352/30

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by J. Schneiders, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 March 2013 (Case R 0935/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 March 2013 (Case R 0935/2012-4;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘engineering for a better world’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11, 35, 37, 39, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 10 244 416

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
No. 09-1262.

No. 09-1418.

#### The Presbyterian Church of Sudan, et al., Petitioners v. Talisman Energy, Inc. Talisman Energy, Inc., Petitioner v. The Presbyterian Church of Sudan, et al.

562 U.S. 946, 131 S. Ct. 79,

178 L. Ed. 2d 241,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7652.

October 4, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 582 F.3d 244.
No. 10-7480.

#### Randell L. McKoy, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1117, 131 S. Ct. 843,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9655.

178 L. Ed. 2d 572,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 Fed. Appx. 991.
No. 10-96.

#### Richard A. Prewitt, Petitioner v. City of Oxford, Mississippi, et al.

562 U.S. 893, 131 S. Ct. 294,

178 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6224.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 44 So. 3d 922.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          32,971                  81,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,093                 339,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000                   3,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               324,763                 489,692
<PP&E>                                         416,397                 405,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,901                 222,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,259                 697,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,394                 683,313
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     101
<COMMON>                                           651                     517
<OTHER-SE>                                   (580,182)                (44,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,259                 697,026
<SALES>                                        290,349                 627,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,349                 627,714
<CGS>                                           71,947                 257,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  496,962                 453,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,118                     884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,678)                (84,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (281,678)                (84,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,678)                (84,166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10-u

                           DESCRIPTION OF ARRANGEMENT
                   BETWEEN ARVINMERITOR, INC. AND LARRY D. YOST

      In July 2004, the Compensation and Management Development Committee and
the Board of Directors of ArvinMeritor, Inc., approved arrangements with respect
to the resignation of Larry D. Yost from the position of Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer. These arrangements consist of the following:

            -     Mr. Yost would continue his employment at his then current
                  salary until his retirement on December 31, 2004;

            -     He would have full participation in awards under the Incentive
                  Compensation Plan for fiscal year 2004;

            -     He would receive $100,000 annually through September 30, 2009
                  to defray the cost of office and secretarial expenses;

            -     Title to his company car would be transferred to him at no
                  cost at the end of the current lease; and

            -     For purposes of the grant of performance-contingent restricted
                  shares made to him on January 2, 2004, he would be deemed to
                  have retired at least a year after the date of grant.
No. 10M52.

#### Ira Don Parthemore, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1090, 131 S. Ct. 811,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9476.

178 L. Ed. 2d 529,

December 6, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 10-7756.

#### Richard M. Lake, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1160, 131 S. Ct. 965,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 252.

178 L. Ed. 2d 794,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,451
<PP&E>                                           1,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              776
<BONDS>                                            873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   479
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    170
<INCOME-TAX>                                        64
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2014024EN.01002502.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/25

---

Action brought on 30 October 2013 — Verus v OHIM — Joie International (MIRUS)

(Case T-576/13)

2014/C 24/45

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verus Eood (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joie International Co. Ltd (Hong Kong, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | vary the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 23 August 2013 in Case R 715/2012-5 so that the opposition is entirely upheld and the application for Community trade mark 9599416 is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

vary the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 23 August 2013 in Case R 715/2012-5 so that the opposition is entirely upheld and the application for Community trade mark 9599416 is rejected;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Joie International Co. Ltd

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Class 12 — application for Community trade mark No 9 599 416

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Classes 12, 25 and 28

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-6897.

#### Quincy A. Lowery, Petitioner v. Robert W. Stevenson, Warden.

562 U.S. 1094, 131 S. Ct. 802,

178 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9454.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 349.
# C_2013171EN.01003804.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/38

---

Action brought on 23 April 2013 — CMC France v Commission

(Case T-236/13)

2013/C 171/76

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CMC France (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission.

Group’Hygiène

Commission.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard McMahon, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 897]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered May 12, 2016, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Ambro, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment *729upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal, the validity of which he does not challenge on appeal, precludes appellate review of his contention that the County Court erred in denying his pre-plea recusal motion (see *People v Weston,*145 AD3d 746, 747 [2016]; *People v Smith,*138 AD3d 1415, 1416 [2016]; *People v Mahipat,*49 AD3d 1243, 1244 [2008]; *People v Anderson,*304 AD2d 975, 976 [2003]).

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.