alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Employment Agreement Amendment



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  

AMENDMENT ONE 
  
 This Amendment One (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated August 5, 2003 (the “Agreement”) is entered into
as of December 2, 2004, by and between Jeffrey Stiefler (the “Executive”) and Digital Insight Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 The Company desires that the Executive continue to be employed by the Company in the capacities described in the Agreement as amended herein, on the terms
and conditions set forth in the Agreement as amended herein, and the Executive is willing to continue such employment on such terms and conditions. 
  
 AGREEMENT 
  
 The Executive and the Company agree that Section 3.3 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety and amended to read as follows:

  

	 	3.3	Annual Bonus. While employed hereunder, the Executive shall be considered for an annual incentive bonus (“Annual Bonus”) that is targeted to be equal
to 80% of his annual Base Salary, with a maximum bonus opportunity of 100% of annual Base Salary, based upon the achievement of performance objectives established by the Board or the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation
Committee”). 

  
 Except as expressly
modified herein, all other terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. This Amendment may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
  
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment One to the
Employment Agreement as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	THE COMPANY
	
	Digital Insight Corporation,
	 a Delaware corporation

		
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Henry DeNero


	 	  	Henry DeNero, Chairman, Compensation Committee
	
	THE EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Jeffrey Stiefler


	 Jeffrey Stiefler
No. 10-6255.

#### Christopher E. Washington, Petitioner v. Experian Incorporated, et al.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 568,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8755.

178 L. Ed. 2d 416,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Gilbert M. Cassagne, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation (collectively, "registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
August 6, 2010

/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne, Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KalogrisName:

Michael E. KalogrisTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

August 13, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
# DLA Energy propels rocket with NOAA and NASA payloads

/ Published Dec. 19, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Energy supported the last launch of the United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California, Nov. 10. The Atlas will be replaced with the ULA Vulcan rocket.

DLA Energy Aerospace Energy supplied 25,000 gallons of kerosene-based rocket propellant and 48,800 gallons of liquid oxygen to the Atlas V first stage booster. For the Centaur upper stage rocket, DLA Aerospace supplied 12,300 gallons of liquid hydrogen and 4,150 gallons of liquid oxygen, along with helium to pressurize these tanks. 

The rocket carried the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Joint Polar Satellite System-2 and NASA’s Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of Inflatable Decelerator.

The JPSS-2 satellite was supported with 1,001 pounds of DLA Energy-provided hydrazine to power its maneuver thrusters for orbital maintenance once in space. The JPSS-2, a polar orbiting satellite that helps forecasters predict weather three to seven days in advance, joined the fleet of JPSS satellites which for more than a decade have been orbiting Earth from the North to the South Pole 14 times a day. The satellites take measurements and snap images that help plan for hurricanes, snowstorms, floods, wildfires, and volcanic activity.

The LOFTID satellite is an inflatable heat shield technology demonstrator and is part of NASA’s Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator, or HIAD, program. According to a NASA press release, the technology tested by LOFTID could improve landing capability for missions to Mars, Venus, and Saturn's moon Titan allowing the landing of heavier payloads and safe touchdown at higher altitudes than are currently accessible. 

Throughout 2022, DLA Energy Aerospace Energy supported 19 Defense Department and NASA space vehicles launches with hypergolic propellants. Among these include four missions for National Reconnaissance Office, three missions for the U.S. Space Force and 11 NASA missions with the James Webb Space Telescope being the most significant.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2451

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure that constitutionally

protected private property rights are not infringed until adequate protection is afforded by reauthorization of such Act, to protect against and

compensate for economic losses from critical habitat designation, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. GRAMM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure

that constitutionally protected private property rights are

not infringed until adequate protection is afforded by

reauthorization of such Act, to protect against and compensate for economic losses from critical habitat designation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm, Ranch, and

5 Homestead Protection Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2451 IS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON DETERMINATION OF ENDAN2 GERED SPECIES AND THREATENED SPECIES

3 AND DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

4 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

5 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(4) MORATORIUM.—Notwithstanding para8 graphs (1) and (3), during the period beginning on

9 the date of enactment of this paragraph and ending

10 on the effective date of the first subsequent reau11 thorization of this Act, the Secretary may not—

12 ‘‘(A) determine that a species is an endan13 gered species or a threatened species under

14 paragraph (1); or

15 ‘‘(B) designate habitat of a species to be

16 critical habitat under paragraph (3).’’.

17 SEC. 3. COMPENSATION OF LANDOWNERS FOR DESIGNA18 TION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

19 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

20 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) (as amended by section 2) is further

21 amended by adding at the end the following new para22 graph:

23 ‘‘(5) COMPENSATION.—If the Secretary des24 ignates habitat of a species to be critical habitat

25 under paragraph (3) and if the habitat is located on

26 property that is owned by a person or entity other
3

•S 2451 IS

1 than the Federal Government, on request of the per2 son or entity, the Secretary shall compensate the

3 person or entity for any loss in market value of the

4 land that results from the designation.’’.

5 SEC. 4. AGENCY ACTIONS.

6 The first sentence of section 7(a)(2) of the Endan7 gered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)) is

8 amended by inserting after ‘‘by such agency’’ the follow9 ing: ‘‘that results in the expenditure of $500,000 or

10 more’’.

Æ
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Kent Craford <kentcraford@hotmail.com> 

Friday, March 06, 2015 3:00 PM 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Cc: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); 'Cohn, Robert E.'; 'Rizzi, Patrick R.'; 'Matthew Leitner'; 

dfinigan@co.del-norte.ca.us 

Subject: Formal withdrawal of proposal for EAS at Crescent City, CA 

Good afternoon, Michael: 

In light of the Border Coast Regional Airport Authority's decision to support Peninsula Airways Inc. for essential air 

service at Crescent City, California, please accept this correspondence as a formal withdrawal of the proposal of Air 

Excursions LLC d/b/a Alaska Seaplanes. 

We respect the choice of the BCRAA as the final decision of the local constituencies it represents, and wish them every 

success in their partnership with PenAir. We appreciated your consideration of our proposal, but instead urge the 

Department's expedient decision in favor of the PenAir service plan. 

Best regards, 

Kent 

Kent Craford 

Co-Owner & President 

Air Excursions LLC d/b/a Alaska Seaplanes 

,~- j'i.-•-<' ~~ '~..,....--···.: ':._ 

-4~~ 

/~·~~ ,, '.~ 

ALASKA SEAPLANES 

Flying at a Higher Standard 

8907 Yandukin Dr. 

Juneau, AK 99801 

Reservations: 907-789-3331 

M: 503-961-4191 

www. flyalaskasea pia nes.com 

~ t:~;~~~~j 

_Q 921~~ i-J---·.:o~;::; 

::r..:.:::::-1 z. 

u =~-:-~ ____ r::;cso .. ~~;·~ 

This e-mail message and the documents attached to it, if any, are intended only for the use of the addressee and may cont~i[!, infarf!}gtion that is 

PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this~communication is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all electronic copies of the message and its attachments, destroy 

any hard copies that you may have created, and reply to the sender advising of the transmission error. 

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2339

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR WILLDEN,

Defendant – Appellant, 

and

TETRA TECH MM INCORPORATED, a/k/a MFG Incorporated; TETRA 

TECH INCORPORATED, 

Defendants,

v.

SAN JOSE WATER CONSERVATION CORPORATION; JAMES ROBERT 

WILLDEN; MICHAEL P. SCHROLL, 

Third Party Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-00777-LO-TRJ)

Submitted: July 8, 2010 Decided: August 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Arthur Willden, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Abram Jones, 

Thomas Collier Mugavero, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls 

Church, Virginia, William Patrick Pearce, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & 

PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, Jane Saindon Rogers, 

WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Willden appeals the district court’s judgment 

in favor of AvalonBay Communities, Incorporated, after the 

district court granted AvalonBay summary judgment on its claims 

against Willden and awarded it $7,450,902 in damages. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s judgment. See AvalonBay 

Communities, Inc. v. Willden, No. 1:08-cv-00777-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. 

Oct. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-307.

#### Jose Melendrez, Jr., Petitioner v. Samuel Fred Biery, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, et al.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 694,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9318.

178 L. Ed. 2d 524,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 498, 178 L. Ed. 2d 292, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8070.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2456

   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out activities on 
 certain federally owned lands to address the adverse effects of 1994 
 wildfires in the western portion of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mr. Gorton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out activities on 
 certain federally owned lands to address the adverse effects of 1994 
 wildfires in the western portion of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Health Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF WILDFIRES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
immediately after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service and in 
consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall carry out the 
following activities on Federally owned lands that were adversely 
affected by the 1994 wildfires in the western portion of the United 
States:
            (1) Thinning and salvaging dead, dying, bug infested, and 
        burnt timber to remove existing fuel loads and improve the 
        health of forests.
            (2) Seeding with grass seeds, conducting tree planting 
        operations, and carrying out other forms of revegetation for 
        the purposes of flood prevention and the prevention of 
        landslides.
    (b) Employment.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to the 
maximum extent practicable, the Secretary of Agriculture shall employ 
dislocated timber workers to carry out the activities specified in 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-5894.

#### Derrick Courtney, Petitioner v. Mike Knowles, Warden.

562 U.S. 941, 131 S. Ct. 357,

178 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7342.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 591.
# C_2015034EN.01003602.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Capella v OHIM — Oribay Mirror Buttons (ORIBAY)

(Case T-307/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark ORIBAY ORIginal Buttons for Automotive Yndustry - Admissibility of the application for revocation))

(2015/C 034/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented: initially by M. Holtorf, subsequently by A. Theis, and lastly by F. Henkel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by G. Schneider, and subsequently by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL (San Sebastián, Spain) (represented by: A. Velázquez Ibañez, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2013 (Case R 164/2012-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Capella EOOD and Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2013 (Case R 164/2012-4); |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2013 (Case R 164/2012-4);

| 2) | Declares that OHIM is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Capella EOOD; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that OHIM is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Capella EOOD;

| 3) | Declares that Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Declares that Oribay Mirror Buttons, SL is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
# C_2015155EN.01002501.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Radecki v OHIM — Vamed (AKTIVAMED)

(Case T-551/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AKTIVAMED - Earlier national figurative mark VAMED - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 155/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michael Radecki (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Pohlmann then S. Hanne, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Vamed AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. Paulitsch, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 July 2013 (Case R 365/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Vamed AG and Michael Radecki.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Michael Radecki to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Michael Radecki to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.

1

---
No. 10-7058.

#### Emmanuel Uko Akpan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1055, 131 S. Ct. 620,

178 L. Ed. 2d 454,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8957.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 457.