1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00115-CV

____________________

CHARLES KIRKWOOD, Appellant

V.

JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND W. PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellees

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-194,967

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Jefferson County filed a motion to dismiss the accelerated appeal of Charles 

Kirkwood from the trial court’s March 15, 2018 order granting Jefferson County’s 

plea to the jurisdiction.1 The letter brief filed by Charles Kirkwood, Appellant, failed 

 

1 This is the third time this case has been before this Court. In the two previous 

appeals, we reversed the trial court’s dismissal order and remanded the case for 

further proceedings. See Kirkwood v. Jefferson Cty., No. 09-16-00337-CV, 2017 WL 

4319771, at *3 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.); 

Kirkwood v. Jefferson Cty., No. 09-15-00296-CV, 2016 WL 536852, at *2 (Tex. 

App.—Beaumont Feb. 11, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.).
2

to present any issue for appellate review and presented no authority supporting a 

reversal of the trial court’s judgment. The brief of Jefferson County, Appellee, 

argued that Kirkwood waived all complaints for the appeal. By letter dated 

September 11, 2018, we notified the parties that Kirkwood’s brief failed to comply 

with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1(a) through (k), directed Kirkwood to 

file an amended brief, and cautioned that his failure to file an amended brief that 

complied with Rule 38.1 by October 11, 2018, would result in dismissal of the appeal 

without further notice. On October 19, 2018, Kirkwood filed another letter brief that 

lacked a list of all parties and counsel, a table of contents, an index of authorities, a 

statement of the case, a list of the issues presented, a statement of facts with 

references to the record, or an argument with appropriate citations to the record. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. On October 22, 2018, Jefferson County filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeal based on Kirkwood’s failure to comply with this Court’s notice 

by filing a brief that complies with Rule 38.1. See id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(c). 

If the court determines that the briefing rules have been flagrantly violated, it 

may require a brief to be amended, and if another brief that does not comply with

Rule 38.1 is filed, the court may strike the brief, prohibit the party from filing 

another, and proceed as if the party had failed to file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a); 
3

see also Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. Because Kirkwood failed to file an amended brief that 

complies with Rule 38.1 after we provided an opportunity to correct the brief, we 

grant Jefferson County’s motion to dismiss, strike the appellant’s non-conforming 

brief, and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 

38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

Submitted on August 28, 2018

Opinion Delivered November 8, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.