alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.23




Escalade,
Incorporated


Schedule
of Director Compensation




Each
independent director of Escalade, Incorporated currently is entitled to receive
an annual cash retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Audit Committee is
entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the Audit
Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $15,000. Each member of the
Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $3,000
except for the Compensation Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive
$10,000. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive
additional fees of $1,000 per committee meeting attended in excess of six and
four meetings respectively. Mr. Robert Griffin, the Chairman of the Board, is
entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000. All independent
directors and Mr. R. Griffin are entitled to receive an additional fee of $1,000
per board meeting attended in excess of eight meetings per year. In 2009, the
independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin have all volunteered to take a 10%
reduction in all fees in which they are entitled to receive. In 2009, each of
the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin received an annual stock option
award of 5,000 shares with a one year vesting.




Under the
terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, directors can elect to
receive some or all of the fees earned in shares of the Company’s common stock
or in the form of RSU’s which vest after one year. In 2009, there were 33,195
shares issued and 54,103 RSU’s issued pursuant to the plan. In 2009, directors
Baalmann, Williams and White opted to receive 100% of the fees they were
entitled to in the form of RSU’s and stock. Director R. Griffin received a
combination of cash and stock. Directors Matthews and Savitsky received their
fees in cash.




Directors
Keller and Patrick Griffin are full-time employees of the Company and receive no
board fees in connection with their service on the Company’s Board of
Directors.
Tips From Former Smokers Tips 2019/TV

Christine/TV “Quit Smoking For Those Who Love You” :30 

The spot opens on the Tips From Former Smokers logo and cuts to Christine sitting in her living room 

speaking to the camera. Her state (Pennsylvania) and age of diagnosis (55) are displayed on screen.

She is missing a large portion of her jaw on the left side of her face.

CHRISTINE: What you’re doing is not just hurting you. It’s hurting everyone that loves you.

The spot cuts to a photo of Christine in a hospital bed, connected to an IV. 

CHRISTINE: It’s impacting them in ways that you cannot imagine. 

The spot cuts to a photo of Christine standing with her son. We see that a large tumor is clearly visible 

along the left side of her jaw. 

CHRISTINE: Tobacco didn’t just affect me, it affected my children. 

We now see a photo of Christine with her two grown children and the tumor along her jaw and neck is 

even larger. We then cut back to Christine speaking into the camera.

CHRISTINE: If you can’t make up your mind to quit for yourself, do it for those who love you and 

who you love. 

The spot cuts to the art card, which reads “You’re not just quitting for yourself.”

ANNCR: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS.

ART CARD: You can quit. For free help, visit CDC.GOV/TIPS. CDC LOGO

SPONSORED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

#CDCTIPS
AEPWCABHA ABIAIIIAHA 

### ~ ' STATE AVIATION

CJIY)KSA YKPAIHH

### ♦ ADMINISTRATION (AEP2KABIACJIYWI&A YKPAIHH) ' ~

### ► ~ OF UKRAINE

Yxpaixa, 01135, M. KHis, np. RepeMorH, 14 Ten:+38(044) 461-54-01 (Daxc:+38(044) 486-92-92 Be6: www.avia.gov.ua E-mail: vdz@avia.gov.ua

3.26-10079 03.06.2015 14, Peremogy ave., 01135, Kyiv, Ukraine Tel.: +38(044) 461-54-01 Fax: +38(044)486-92-92 Web: www.avia.gov.ua E-mail: vdz@avia.gov.ua

Mr. Paul L.Gretch Director Office of International Aviation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington DC 20591

Dear Mr. Gretch,

The State Aviation Administration of Ukraine presents its compliments to you and taking into account the U.S. Department of Transportation's rule requiring a statement of reciprocity every six months with respect to charter applications filed by Ukrainian airlines to the U.S. Department of Transportation would like to confirm that it will accord the same privileges to U.S. airlines to operate cargo charter flights with Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Freedom to the extent that the U.S. Department of Transportation grants reciprocal privileges to Ukrainian airlines according to the submitted applications.

Yours sincerely,

Mykola Melnichenko, Deputy Chairman



## 008522
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131942 & (26) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131942 

 COA: 267317 

Wayne CC: 01-003494-01 

CAPRESE D. GARDNER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of December 13, 2006, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application is again considered. 

We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take 

other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). We further ORDER the Wayne Circuit 

Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the 

defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the defendant in this 

Court. The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of the 

order appointing counsel, addressing whether People v Preuss, 436 Mich 714 (1990), 

and People v Stoudemire, 429 Mich 262 (1987), mod Preuss, supra, correctly held that 

multiple convictions arising out of a single criminal incident may count as only a single 

prior conviction for habitual offender purposes, and if so, whether the defendant is 

entitled to be resentenced. 

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for 

permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

d0410 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 13, 2007 

Clerk
No. 10-7263.

#### David Brandford, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 681,

178 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9239.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 310.
First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 
 AND PLAN OF MERGER 
  
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER is dated and is effective as of December 13, 2004, among IBERIABANK Corporation (“IBKC”) and American Horizons Bancorp, Inc. (“AHB”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  

	 	•	The parties have previously entered into a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 29, 2004 (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which AHB will merge into
IBERIABANK Acquisition Corporation (“IBAC”) (the “Merger”). 

  

	 	•	The purpose of this First Amendment is to amend the Agreement to reflect certain modifications as agreed upon by the parties. 

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms herein which are defined in the
Plan shall be as defined in the Agreement, except as otherwise defined in this First Amendment. 
  
 2. The Merger. The “Merger” shall mean the merger of AHB into IBKC. All references to IBAC are hereby eliminated from the Agreement and
the related Agreement of Merger in the form of Exhibit A to the Agreement and substituted with IBKC. 
  
 3. Article 4 Revision. Section 4.6(b) is amended to read was follows: 
  
 (b) declare, pay or make any dividend or distribution on, or reclassify or acquire, or issue (except upon
exercise of options outstanding on the date of this Agreement) or sell or grant options or other rights to acquire any additional shares of or any securities or obligations convertible into or exchangeable for, its capital stock; except that if the
Closing does not occur on or before March 31, 2005, the Cash Consideration to be paid at Closing shall be increased by an amount equal to the cash dividends per share declared by IBKC with a record date between January 1, 2005 and April 1, 2005
times the shares of IBKC Common Stock to be issued in the Merger. 
  
 4. Continued Effect. Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The Agreement as amended herein is hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First
Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date hereinabove provided by their duly authorized officers. 
  

							
	IBERIABANK CORPORATION	 	AMERICAN HORIZONS BANCORP, INC.
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Daryl G. Byrd

	 	By:	 	 /s/ William E. Pratt


	 	 	Daryl G. Byrd	 	 	 	William E. Pratt
	 	 	Its: President	 	 	 	Its: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         544,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,145,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   372,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,767,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,255,000
<PP&E>                                      41,437,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,454,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,797,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,606,000
<BONDS>                                      6,720,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,347,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,797,000
<SALES>                                     27,321,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,321,000
<CGS>                                       10,768,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,023,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             912,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,576,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,576,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,576,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2883 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow chiropractors 

to provide items and services through private contracts with Medicare 

beneficiaries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mrs. WALORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

chiropractors to provide items and services through private contracts with Medicare beneficiaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractors Equity 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2883 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING CHIROPRACTORS TO PROVIDE ITEMS 

2 AND SERVICES THROUGH PRIVATE CON3 TRACTS WITH MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1802(b)(6)(B) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395a(b)(6)(B)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) of’’. 

7 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub8 section (a) shall apply with respect to items and services 

9 furnished on or after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-5221.

#### Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass, Petitioner v. New York City Transit, et al.

562 U.S. 1042, 131 S. Ct. 625,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8840.

178 L. Ed. 2d 432,

November 15, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 2-69243) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996 Long-term
Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1980 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-01526) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan and the EDO Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-28020) pertaining to the EDO Corporation
1983 Long-term Incentive Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Long-term Incentive
Plan, the EDO Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 1996
Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77865)
pertaining to the EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors, the EDO
Corporation 1997 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and the EDO Corporation
1996 Long-term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-88620) relating to the issuance by EDO Corporation of its 5.25% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2007, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-105265) pertaining to the EDO Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan and the EDO Corporation 2002 Long-term Incentive Plan of EDO
Corporation and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 23,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EDO
Corporation, EDO Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of EDO Corporation, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 1, 2005
# C_2013141EN.01002502.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/25

---

Action brought on 20 March 2013 — Selo Medical v OHIM — biosyn Arzneimittel (SELOGYN)

(Case T-173/13)

2013/C 141/46

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Selo Medical GmbH (Unternberg, Austria) (represented by: T. Schneider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH (Fellbach, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 January 2013 in Case R 2601/2011-4 and reject the opposition against the Community trade mark application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 January 2013 in Case R 2601/2011-4 and reject the opposition against the Community trade mark application;

| — | Order OHIM or the potential intervener to pay the costs pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM or the potential intervener to pay the costs pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SELOGYN’ for goods in Class 5 — Community trade mark application No 9 049 016

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘SELESYN’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 29 and 44

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
No. 10-6822.

#### In re Lee H. Wagner, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1001, 131 S. Ct. 550,

178 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8458.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 10-7295.

#### Peter Massinga, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 1150, 131 S. Ct. 932,

178 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 188.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.
# C_2015429EN.01000401.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — B&S Global Transit Center BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-319/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Community Customs Code - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Articles 203 and 204 - External Community transit procedure - Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Articles 365, 366 and 859 - Incurrence of a customs debt - Whether or not goods are unlawfully removed from customs supervision - Non-fulfilment of an obligation - Failure to end the transit procedure - Removal of the goods from the customs territory of the European Union))

(2015/C 429/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B&S Global Transit Center BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 203 and 204 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 of 20 November 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that a failure to comply with the obligation to present goods placed under the external Community transit procedure at the customs office of destination leads to a customs debt being incurred on the basis not of Article 204 of Regulation No 2913/92, as amended by Regulation No 1791/2006, but of Article 203 of Regulation No 2913/92, as amended by Regulation No 1791/2006, where the goods concerned have left the customs territory of the European Union and the holder under that procedure is unable to produce documents that comply with Article 365(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation No 2913/92, in the version following the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2001 of 4 May 2001, or Article 366(2) and (3) of Regulation No 2454/93, in the version following the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1192/2008 of 17 November 2008.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 23.  Consents of Experts and Counsel


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Dravo Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos. 33-
23632, 2-84462, 2-64137, 33-54179, 333-01689, 333-01691 and 333-07537 on Form
S-8, No. 33-17356 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to No. 2-87555 on Form S-8/S-3,
and No. 2-71993 on Form S-16 amended by Form S-3 of Dravo Corporation, of our
reports dated January 21, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Dravo Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings, and cash flows
and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997 which reports appear in, or are
incorporated by reference in, the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Dravo Corporation.  

                                         /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1998

                                   23-1
ET OPLRATION S 

• ^ o.n ' 10 

October 12,2011 

Exemption No. 10033 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-16561 

US Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building groimd floor 

RoomW12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sirs/Madams, 

Wings Airways Inc. (certificate number KJLA 259K), doing business at 2 Marine Way, Suite 

175, Juneau, Alaska 99801 is requesting renewal of existing Exemption No. 10033, 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2003-16561. All Facts, Circumstances, Conditions and Area of 

Operation remain the same. 

Should you have any questions, please call me at (907) 957-6041 or email me at 

dan@wingsairways.com. 

Daniel C Corson 

Director of Operations 

Wings Airways 

2 MARINE WAY, SUITE 175 * JUNEAU * AK * 99801 * 

* 907-586-6275 * FAX 907-586-6276 

* WWW.WINGSAiRWAYS.COM *
No. 10-7140.

#### Warren L. Edwards, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1146, 131 S. Ct. 920,

178 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 490,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.