Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
														Search

		Submit


Tuberculosis (TB)


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home


Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Report of Expert Consultations on Rapid Molecular Testing to Detect Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the United States										Related Pages
										General considerations and principles for a molecular drug-resistance testing service
13,299 TB cases were reported to CDC in 2007 (5,17).
This includes 10,590 pulmonary and 2697 extrapulmonary cases, 10426 culture confirmed cases, 762 isoniazid-resistant cases, and 125 MDR TB cases.
Of the 10,590 pulmonary cases, 4864 were sputum smear positive for AFB, 4524 were smear negative and 7366 were sputum culture positive and 1878 were culture negative.
Rifampin resistance is a reliable surrogate (positive predictive value >95%) for MDR TB when isolated rifampin resistance is uncommon, as it is in the United States (18–20).
Molecular DR tests are useful for testing isolates and respiratory specimens directly. However, the currently available tests are highly reliable when used with AFB-smear positive specimens, but they are less reliable when used with AFB-smear negative specimens. There is little information on the performance of molecular DR tests with other types of specimens.
Both ‘susceptible’ and ‘resistant’ results from molecular DR tests can be useful.
The sensitivity and specificity of molecular DR tests for rifampin are sufficiently high (>97%) to use both resistant and susceptible results in case management decisions.
The sensitivity of molecular DR tests for isoniazid is not sufficient to exclude isoniazid resistance based on a negative result. However, because isoniazid resistance is about 8% in the United States, the positive predictive value for isoniazid resistance is relatively high and molecular detection of isoniazid resistance can be used in case management decisions.
Molecular DR testing is particularly useful for
patients suspected or at high risk of having drug-resistant TB,
very ill patients for whom drug-susceptibility information might alter case management decisions, such as patients who do not get better while taking standard first-line therapy,
outbreak or contact investigations when drug resistance is suspected in the source case or in some severely immunocompromised persons such as HIV-infected persons or those receiving dialysis in which knowledge of drug-susceptibility would be a significant benefit and affect preventive therapy decisions,
persons for whom drug-susceptibility information would influence TB Control decisions such as placing the person on a ‘Do Not Board’† list, and
isolates that contain a mixture of *M. tuberculosis* bacteria and other mycobacteria or respiratory specimens containing only nonviable *M. tuberculosis* bacteria.
Molecular DR testing has significant potential added value for clinicians and TB control officials.
Earlier detection of resistance leads to earlier initiation of an effective treatment regimen, a reduced period of infectiousness, and improved patient outcomes.
Earlier notification of drug-resistant TB cases should permit public health interventions sooner and may engage an MDR TB expert sooner in the care of the TB patient.
Earlier detection of rifampin resistance should lead to earlier testing for susceptibility to other first-line and second-line anti-TB drugs.
Benefits of routing requests for molecular DR tests through the TB Program include
early engagement of the TB Control Program in potential TB cases,
early engagement of TB laboratory in follow-up susceptibility testing,
improved communications between TB clinicians, controllers, and laboratorians,
reinforcement of the important role played by state and local TB Programs,
engagement of a person knowledgeable about molecular DR testing for TB early in decisions regarding whether or not to request a molecular DR test, and
avoidance of excessive and inappropriate ordering of the molecular DR tests – simply having a check-off box on a form often leads to inappropriate ordering.
Turnaround time (TAT) must be as brief as possible to maximize benefits of molecular DR testing. The key TAT is the interval from specimen collection to time that the test result is used by the clinician for case management.
It is essential that the detection of resistance immediately trigger additional (reflex) testing for susceptibility to first and second line anti-TB drugs by conventional and molecular methods.†The CDC and the Department of Homeland Security have developed a national ‘Do Not Board list’ to prevent commercial air travel of persons with known communicable diseases that pose a serious public health threat, such as infectious tuberculosis. A person whose name appears on a **“**Do Not Board**”** list, will not be allowed to board an airplane that is inbound to the United States, outbound from the United States, or any domestic flight inside of the United States.
A potential benefit of a system for providing molecular DR tests may be expanding access to NAA testing for the initial diagnosis of TB.
State regulations need to be addressed as part of developing a regional approach. For example, laboratories, regardless of location, that conduct testing for patients in New York must be certified by New York State.
No molecular DR test has been approved by the FDA for use in the United States, although well-characterized test kits are available in Europe and elsewhere. Several validated molecular DR tests (line-probe assays, molecular beacons, and DNA sequencing) based on analyte specific reagents, often called “home-brew” or “in-house” tests are used in the United States. Each test displays similar performance characteristics. At this time, data do not demonstrate clearly the superiority of one method over another.
Tests that detect *M. tuberculosis* DNA and drug resistance in one step have potential advantages related to lower cost, less hands-on time, simpler testing procedure, and use of a closed system. Although the currently available one-step systems have excellent performance with AFB-smear positive specimens and cultures, they perform less well when used with AFB-smear negative specimens.
A protocol that uses two methods (e.g., uses an optimized NAA assay to detect *M. tuberculosis* DNA (13–15) and a second assay to assess resistance) has potential advantages of increased sensitivity, particularly if AFB-smear negative specimens are tested, and the possibility of conducting more informative second tests (e.g., sequencing). Disadvantages may include a higher cost, more hands-on time, and potential end-product contamination.
Specimens suitable for molecular DR testing include cultures, processed specimens (sediments), and non-processed respiratory specimens. Because of the differences in the cost of testing non-processed (processing and molecular testing) and processed specimens (only molecular testing), programs must accurately project the anticipated numbers of non-processed and processed specimens to be tested to enable the molecular DR testing laboratories to estimate the cost of the services and CDC to adequately fund the service.
Advantages of processed specimens include (1) prior testing showed the sample was AFB+ and (2) it would not be necessary to process the specimen at the molecular DR laboratory which saves time and labor for the molecular DR testing laboratory. Potential disadvantages include possibly insufficient quantity of the remnant sample and possible errors introduced during processing may affect the molecular DR testing.
Advantages of non-processed specimens include (1) results with this specimen would be a check or confirmation of the results from conventional testing of another specimen, (2) a processing method optimized for molecular DR testing could be used, and (3) any errors in testing the first specimen would not affect the result of molecular DR testing. Potential disadvantages include (1) increased work load and cost for the molecular DR testing laboratory, (2) lengthening of the TAT at the molecular DR testing laboratory, (3) delays for obtaining a second specimen, and (4) sometimes a follow-up specimen may be AFB-negative due to sporadic shedding of TB bacilli.
Advantages of testing cultures using molecular DR test include increased sensitivity and accuracy of the molecular DR test. Potential disadvantages include the time needed to obtain an isolate and the expense of shipping viable cultures may be as much as 5-fold more than for specimens.
Molecular DR tests enhance but do not replace culture or conventional drug-susceptibility testing.
Molecular DR tests are not as sensitive as culture for detecting *M. tuberculosis* complex bacteria.
Molecular DR tests are not as sensitive as culture-based proportion tests for detecting resistant bacteria in a mixture of resistant and susceptible bacteria.
Molecular DR tests are most useful for rifampin, somewhat less useful for isoniazid, and not currently available for other anti-TB drugs although some are being developed.
False-positive and false-negative molecular DR test results do occur.
In the case of discrepancies between conventional and molecular DR test results for rifampin and isoniazid, clinicians should use the conventional DS results and clinical judgment for case management decisions until the discrepancy is resolved.
Failure of molecular DR tests can be caused by the presence of inhibitors in the sample that prevent or reduce NAA. Inhibitors appear to be present in 2% to 5% of respiratory specimens tested by NAA (21). Procedures must be in place to ensure that inhibition does not cause falsely negative or non-interpretable molecular DR test results. This may include internal controls to detect inhibitors and reflex repeat testing of samples suspected to contain inhibitors with steps taken to reduce inhibition (e.g., dilution or purification of DNA).
Shipping costs will be substantial. In the Florida molecular DR testing program, the contract cost of FedEx next-day shipments for specimens is $11 to $28 ($3 to $5 for shipping container plus $8 [weekday] or $23 [Saturday] for transport). The cost of U.S. Postal Service next day shipments of specimens is $16.75 plus the cost of the container. For isolates, the cost of FedEx is $97 to $115 ($12 to $15 for the container plus $85 [weekday] or $100 [Saturday] for transport). The cost of shipping isolates to the genotyping laboratories using the CDC FedEx account is $27 per shipment plus the cost of the container.
Reagent costs for the currently validated molecular DR tests range from $8 to $30 per sample. It is estimated that one technician can perform 20 molecular DR tests per day. Additional operating costs include time and materials needed for processing samples; preparing samples for molecular DR testing; entering, verifying and reporting results; technical assistance and consultation; proficiency testing; quality laboratory management; equipment; information technology, and overhead.
Cost efficiency, rapid turnaround time, and expertise would be enhanced by establishing high-volume regional laboratories offering molecular DR tests.
New funds will be needed to cover the costs of the molecular DR testing program. Potential sources of non-CDC funds to partially offset the cost of the program include the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and insurance providers.
Good communication between laboratorians, clinicians, and public health officials will be critical to optimizing the benefits of molecular DR testing. Standard language or statements to include in laboratory reports of molecular DR test results are needed, such as the information in points 4a, 4b, and 16 above, to assist clinicians interpret the results.
Education of laboratorians, clinicians, TB controllers, and policy makers on the appropriate use and interpretation of molecular DR tests for TB will be essential.
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  September 1, 2012					Content source: 	Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention homeTuberculosisBasic TB Factsplus iconHow TB SpreadsLatent TB Infection and TB DiseaseSigns & SymptomsTB Risk FactorsExposure to TBTB PreventionVaccinesTB & HIV CoinfectionTB and DiabetesTB TermsPersonal StoriesTesting & Diagnosisplus iconWho Should be TestedTesting for TB InfectionTesting in BCG-Vaccinated PersonsTB Screening and Testing of Health Care PersonnelTesting During PregnancyDiagnosing latent TB infection and TB diseaseTreatmentplus iconDeciding When to Treat Latent TB InfectionTreatment Regimens for Latent TB Infection (LTBI)Treatment for TB DiseaseAdverse EventsTB Treatment of Persons Living with HIVTB Treatment and PregnancyTB Treatment for ChildrenFrequently Asked QuestionsDrug-Resistant TBResearchplus iconTB Epidemiologic Studies Consortiumplus iconResearch ProjectsPublicationsTB Trials Consortiumplus iconStudy DescriptionsBackgroundBehavioral & Social Science ResearchHealth Care Settingsplus iconTB Infection Control in Health Care SettingsResources for TB Screening and Testing of Health Care Personnelplus iconFrequently Asked QuestionsTB in Specific Populationsplus iconHealth DisparitiesAsian PersonsBlack or African American PersonsHispanic or Latino PersonsChildrenPregnancyCorrectional FacilitiesPeople Experiencing HomelessnessInternational TravelersLaboratory Informationplus iconDrug Susceptibility TestingFalse-Positive Investigation ToolkitInterim Laboratory Biosafety Guidance for XDR  tuberculosis strainsModel Performance Evaluation Program (MPEP)Rapid Molecular Testing to Detect Drug-Resistant TB in the USplus iconExecutive SummaryIntroductionBackground on Tests for Molecular Detection of DRGeneral Considerations and Principles for a Molecular DR Testing ServicePossible Scenarios and Scope of Testing for a Molecular DR Testing ServiceResearch NeedsGeneral Recommendations of the Expert PanelCommunication Plan for the ReportRecommendationsReferencesPanel Members and CDC ParticipantsAppendix 1Appendix 2Appendix 3The Uses of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Diagnosis of TBplus iconGeneral ConsiderationsGeneral Recommendations of the Expert PanelRecommendations to ACET, CDC, DTBEData & Statisticsplus iconTB Incidence in the United StatesReported TB in the US, 2022 Surveillance Reportplus iconNational DataReporting Area DataRisk FactorsDemographicsTB Treatment and Case OutcomesDrug-Resistant TBMolecular SurveillanceTuberculosis in the United States, 2022 (Slide Set)Archived Surveillance Reports and Slide Sets2021 State and City ReportArchived State and City ReportsProfessional Resources & Toolsplus iconTools for Healthcare ProvidersResources for TB Programsplus iconStrengthening Civil Surgeons’ Capacity to Improve LTBI Surveillance and Outcomes Among Status AdjustersNotice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)Program EvaluationTB Centers of ExcellenceTB Elimination AllianceTB Genotypingplus iconConventional TB GenotypingWhole Genome SequencingTB GIMSAnalytic ToolsLatent Tuberculosis Infection ResourcesPublications & Productsplus iconPatient and Public MaterialsFact SheetsGuidelinesplus iconControl & EliminationDrug-Resistant TBInfection Control & PreventionLaboratory & GenotypingTB & HIVTB in Specific PopulationsTesting & DiagnosisTreatmentVaccines & ImmunizationsArchived TB GuidelinesGuides & Toolkitsplus iconAggregate ReportsCDC TB Surveillance TrainingCore CurriculumEffective TB Interviewing for Contact InvestigationEthnographic GuidesFalse-Positive Investigation ToolkitForging Partnerships to Eliminate TuberculosisGuide to Application of GenotypingLTBI: A Guide for Primary Health Care ProvidersMantoux Tuberculin Skin Testing ProductsReport of Verified Case of Tuberculosis (RVCT)Self-Study ModulesTB Contact Investigation Interviewing Skills CourseTB eDOT ToolkitUnderstanding the TB Cohort Review ProcessNewslettersplus iconTB Notes, No. 4, 2023TB Notes, No. 3, 2023TB Notes. No. 2, 2023TB Notes. No. 1, 2023TB Notes, No. 4, 2022TB Notes, No. 3, 2022TB Notes, No. 2, 2022TB Notes, No. 1, 2022TB Notes, No. 4, 2021TB Notes, No. 3, 2021TB Notes, No. 2, 2021TB Notes, No. 1, 2021Pamphlets, Brochures, Bookletsplus iconQuestions and AnswersPatient Education SeriesTuberculosis - Get the FactsTuberculosis - The Connection between TB and HIV12-Dose Regimen for Latent TB Infection-Patient Education BrochurePostersplus iconMantoux Tuberculin Skin Test Wall ChartWorld TB DayThink TBStop TBTake on TBReports & Articlesplus iconDTBE Authored Journal ArticlesTuberculosis Laboratory Aggregate ReportsSlide Setsplus iconIntroduction to TuberculosisEpidemiology of Tuberculosis Among Non-U.S.​–Born Persons in the United States, 1993–2016Self-Study Modules on Tuberculosis, 1-5 Slide SetsThe Tuberculosis (TB) in Correctional Settingsplus iconFacilitator GuideIntroduction to TB GenotypingEpidemiology of Tuberculosis in Correctional Facilities, United States, 1993-2017Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis in Correctional and Detention FacilitiesGuidelines for Preventing the Transmission of M. TB in Health care SettingsInvestigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious TBEpidemiology of Pediatric Tuberculosis in the United StatesTargeted Tuberculosis Testing and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis InfectionElectronic Tools & ResourcesWeb-Based Courses & Webinarsplus iconTB 101 for Health Care WorkersContent SyndicationInfographicsplus iconSocial Media GraphicsCustomizable Take on TB Infographic with InstructionsEventsWorld TB Dayplus iconU.S. TB ChampionsHistoryFeaturesplus iconTB Risk FactorsTreating Latent TB Infection with Short-Course RegimensWorld Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2021World Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2020Linksplus iconState TB Control OfficesAbout Usplus iconMission Statement and Activitiesplus iconDTBE Strategic PlanNational TB Program ObjectivesOrganization ChartAdvisory Groupsplus iconFederal TB Task Force To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address: Email Address			What's this?				Submit


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue