alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EPA-420-R-10-007

February 2010 

# Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Prepared for EPA by

ICF International

and

T&B Systems

EPA Contract No. EP-C-06-094

Work Assignment No. 3-6 

# Development and Evaluation of an Air

**Quality Modeling Approach for Lead**

**Emissions from Piston**

- **Engine Aircraft**

**Operating on Leaded Aviation Gasoline**

**Appendix F**

**Sensitivity Analysis Figures**

NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data

that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to

facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of

technical developments.

# ii 

# T

HIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK



# .Figure F-1. Low twin engine percent sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-1Figure F-2. High twin engine percent sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-2Figure F-3. Low run-up time sensitivitytest – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-3Figure F-4. High runup time sensitivitytest – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-4Figure F-5. Low taxi time sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-5Figure F-6. High taxi time sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-6Figure F-7. Low lead baseline sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-7Figure F-8. High lead sensitivity test – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-8Figure F-9. Low twin sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-9Figure F-10. High twin sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-10Figure F-11. Low runup sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-11Figure F-13. High runup sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-12Figure F-14. High taxi sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-13Figure F-15. Low lead baseline sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-14Figure F-16. High lead sensitivity test average – June through August 2008 (ng/m3).F-15F-16THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Exhibit 23

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
EDO Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.2-69243,
33-1526 and 33-28020 on Form S-8 of EDO Corporation of our report dated
February 13, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of EDO
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of EDO
Corporation.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Jericho, New York
March 17, 1998
No. 10-6472.

#### Denard L. Jones, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 607,

178 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8913.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 49 So. 3d 238.
No. 09-10261.

#### Edward Basley, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1079, 131 S. Ct. 635,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9142.

178 L. Ed. 2d 510,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *511Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 455.
<PAGE>

CERTIFICATIONS
--------------

I, Christopher W. Vieth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dow Jones & Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 5, 2004

/s/ Christopher W. Vieth
------------------------
Christopher W. Vieth
Chief Financial Officer

                                     Page 1
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RAJEEV
MADHAVANRajeev MadhavanChief Executive OfficerMarch 11, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15938]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3078]

State of Tennessee; Amendment #4

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated May 26, 1998, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to include Hamblen County in the State of Tennessee as a 
disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms, tornadoes, and 
flooding beginning on April 16, 1998 and continuing through May 18, 
1998.
    All counties contiguous to the above-named primary county have been 
previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is June 19, 1998 and for 
economic injury the termination date is January 20, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
Becky C. Brantley,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15938 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Exhibit
23.2








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration
Statements (Forms S-8, No.333-99259,
333-73298 and 333-110364)pertaining to
the 2000 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Compensation Plan of GPS
Industries, Inc.(f.k.a.
Inforetech Wireless Technology, Inc.) and related Prospectus of our report dated
April 9, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of GPS
Industries, Inc.,as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008,included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31,
2008.




Moore
Stephens Lovelace, P. A.




Orlando,
Florida




April 9,
2009
# C&T, industry partners meet on sustaining military support

/ Published July 27, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

The “bottom line” is to make the process better for U.S. clothing and textiles manufacturers to maintain their support of the warfighter, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander said during a meeting with industry representatives July 20.

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, along with other leaders from DLA Troop Support and the Clothing and Textiles supply chain, hosted a C&T Partners meeting to discuss support of military clothing and equipment items.

“We need to keep those discussions going,” Hamilton said. “These sessions are very important to me. I think it’s good dialogue and there’s no right or wrong. It’s how to get better.”

Among DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains, C&T has the most fragile industry base. And Hamilton said it’s the only industrial group he meets with in these types of forums. As DLA must comply with the Department of Defense’s Berry Amendment, Hamilton said it’s important to sustain domestic manufacturers for future military requirements.

The Berry Amendment requires DOD agencies to purchase food, clothing and textiles items from U.S. suppliers.

Forums such as C&T Partners serves as an opportunity for open discussion on overall industry business development activity, Roy Dillard, C&T director of supplier operations, said. C&T will also host the 2016 Joint Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry in the fall, where DLA and military service representatives will brief industry on future requirements and business opportunities. 

During C&T Partners, industry representatives discussed sustaining current and future items, and training opportunities for C&T personnel.

Ashley Bullock, from the National Council of Textiles Organizations, said C&T staff are welcome to tour manufacturers’ facilities as an educational opportunity.

“From yarn-making to polyester, we think it’s a wonderful idea to get your next generation of contracting staff [to tour our plants].”

C&T’s culture improvement team has hosted visits to supplier sites in the past to provide employees first-hand exposure to the industrial base. 

The C&T Partners consist of a representative from eight industry associations, including three trade associations, three suppliers and two joint government-industry committees.

Trade associations: 

· American Apparel and Footwear Association

· National Council of Textile Organizations

· Warrior Protection and Readiness Coalition

Mandatory suppliers:

· Federal Prison Industries

· National Industries for the Blind

· SourceAmerica

Joint government-industry committees

· DoD Glove Industry Committee

· DoD Technical Footwear Committee
##### 



Draft of February 23, 2006
 R.H. Donnelley Corporation
Summary of Board Compensation
(Non-employee directors)
 FY2006Board CompensationAnnual Retainer Fee
    
    $
    40,000Additional Retainer Fee to Lead Director
    
    $
    36,000Meeting Fee:- in person
    
    $
    1,200- telephonic
    
    $
    500Committee CompensationCorporate Governance Committee
Chairperson Retainer
    
    $
    8,000Committee Meeting Fee
    
    $
    1,200Committee Meeting Fee (Chairperson)
Compensation and Benefits Committee
    
    $
    1,000Chairperson Retainer
    
    $
    8,000Committee Meeting Fee
    
    $
    1,200Committee Meeting Fee (Chairperson)
Audit and Finance Committee
    
    $
    1,000Chairperson Retainer
    
    $
    12,000Committee Meeting Fee
    
    $
    1,200Committee Meeting Fee (Chairman)
    
    $
    1,000
No. 10-6662.

#### Christopher R. Woodberry, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 540,

178 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8356.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 307.
# C_2013101EN.01002302.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/23

---

Action brought on 6 February 2013 — Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper/OHIM — Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement (AC)

(Case T-60/13)

2013/C 101/51

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reiner Appelrath-Cüpper Nachf. GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Schumann and A. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ann Christine Lizenzmanagement GmbH & Co. KG (Braunschweig, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Forth Board of Appeal of 28 November 2012 (R 108/2012-4) insofar as the appeal was upheld and the CTM applied for was rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Forth Board of Appeal of 28 November 2012 (R 108/2012-4) insofar as the appeal was upheld and the CTM applied for was rejected;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the cost of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the cost of the proceedings;

| — | Order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘AC’, for goods and services in classes 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 070 021

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German trademarks No 30 666 076 and No 30 666 074 and International trade mark registration No 948 259 designating several Member States of the European Union of the figurative mark ‘AC ANNE CHRISTINE’, for goods and services in classes 3, 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35; Community trade mark No 6 904 783, for goods in classes 3, 9, 14 and 25; Community trademark No 6 905 541 for goods in classes 3, 14 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal partly and annulled the contested decision with respect goods and services of classes 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35, rejected the CTM applied for these goods and services and rejected the appeal for the remainder

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 15 and 42(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2015389EN.01003501.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA)

(Case T-426/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark AINHOA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the mark’s distinctive character))

(2015/C 389/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Granado Carpenter and M. L. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and A. Schifko, agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Cosmetica Cabinas SL (El Masnou, Spain) (represented by: L. Montoya Terán and J.-B. Devaureix, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2013 (Case R 1642/2012-1), relating to revocation proceedings between L’Oréal and Cosmetica Cabinas SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.

1

---
# C_2014031EN.01000601.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 28 November 2013 — Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances v Gérard de Ruyter

(Case C-623/13)

2014/C 31/08

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Applicant:

Defendant: Gérard de Ruyter

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the tax levies on income from assets, such as the social contribution on income from assets, the social debt repayment contribution based on that same income, the social levy of 2 % and the additional contribution to that levy, have, by virtue of the mere fact that they contribute to the financing of compulsory French social security schemes, a direct and relevant link with some of the branches of social security listed in Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, (1) and do they thus fall within the scope of that regulation?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2.

1

---
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USEC Inc.; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December 11, 2012 | /s/ John K. Welch                                |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | John K. Welch                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|              | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                       |
# Norfolk distribution center supports annual “Run with the Chiefs” event

/ Published Sept. 23, 2016
NORFOLK, Virginia, 

Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Va., recently opened its streets to support Naval Station Norfolk’s “Run with the Chiefs” event.  This year’s 5k run had more than 1,000 participants, and was a celebration of past and present chief petty officers and selectees. 

DLA Distribution Norfolk supported the event by opening their compound for the runners to travel straight down Gilbert Street.

"The chief petty officer is truly the backbone of the Navy, and being selected to serve as a chief is a career milestone every enlisted member strives for,” said Navy Capt. Harry Thetford, commander of DLA Distribution Norfolk.  “The ‘Run with the Chiefs’ is a huge event for the base, and an important step toward the ceremony where the newly selected chiefs are pinned with the symbolic anchors."

As the street closure would affect all in-bound and out-bound trucks and shipments to and from Building W-143, security began coordination with the tenants of W-143 to ensure their awareness and support of the event.  With four large commands in addition to DLA located in W-143, it was important that all commands were aware of the impact on shipments and deliveries, construction, and contractor movement during the hours the compound would be closed to vehicle and pedestrian traffic.  “All commands were very supportive and several offered their assistance in the form of materials and/or personnel,” said Thetford. 

Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Navy Food Management Team Norfolk provided four additional personnel to assist with securing the route through the compound.  MSC Security was present and provided additional cones for marking off areas, and a representative from NAVSUP FLC Security was on hand.  “We were very appreciative for the assistance we received,” said Thetford.

The Morale, Welfare and Recreation-organized race was a fundraiser for the Chief Petty Officer Scholarship Fund.

"DLA Distribution Norfolk was honored to play a role in this important event, and I'm proud of our team and how they stepped up to support," said Thetford.