alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Corey M. Horowitz Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
 May 18, 2011
No. 10-5403.

#### Daniel Loreto Noriega, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1140, 131 S. Ct. 897,

178 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 538.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 48 Cal. 4th 517, 108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 74, 229 P.3d 1.
No. 09-1463.

#### Deborah A. Messina, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 1171, 131 S. Ct. 979,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 355.

178 L. Ed. 2d 808,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 144, 178 L. Ed. 2d 36, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6061.
# C_2016098EN.01003202.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Brammer v OHIM — Office Ernest T. Freylinger (EUROMARKER)

(Case T-683/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark EUROMARKER - Earlier Community word mark EURIMARK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 098/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brammer GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. Kornfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and H. Kunz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Office Ernest T. Freylinger SA (Strassen, Luxembourg)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2013 (Case R 1653/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Office Ernest T. Freylinger SA and Brammer GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls, in part, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 October 2013 (Case R 1653/2012-1) in so far as it was found in that decision that there was a likelihood of confusion as regards the services ‘providing access to database services for searching for the availability and specifications of community trademarks and designs’ in Class 38 covered by the mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls, in part, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 October 2013 (Case R 1653/2012-1) in so far as it was found in that decision that there was a likelihood of confusion as regards the services ‘providing access to database services for searching for the availability and specifications of community trademarks and designs’ in Class 38 covered by the mark applied for;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Brammer GmbH and OHIM to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Brammer GmbH and OHIM to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.

1

---
No. 10-401.

#### Jeffrey A. Weinman, Trustee, Petitioner v. James Winslow Graves, et ux.

562 U.S. 1135, 131 S. Ct. 906,

178 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 373.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2014045EN.01003701.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/37

---

Action brought on 25 November 2013 — The Tea Board v OHIM — Delta Lingerie (Darjeeling)

(Case T-624/13)

2014/C 45/64

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Tea Board (Calcutta, India) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Delta Lingerie (Cachan, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 September 2013 given in Case R 1504/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 September 2013 given in Case R 1504/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark claiming the colour green containing the verbal element ‘Darjeeling’ for Classes 25, 35 and 38 — the Community trade mark application No 9 466 269

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community collective trade mark registration No 4 325 718 of the word mark ‘DARJEELING’ for goods in Class 30; Community collective trade mark registration No 8 674 327 of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘DARJEELING’ for goods in Class 30

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35225-35226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-3126-EM]


Kansas; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an 
emergency for the State of Kansas (FEMA-3126-EM), dated June 9, 1998, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 9, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated June 9, 1998, the President declared an emergency under the 
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Kansas, resulting from an explosion on June 8, 1998, is of 
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant an emergency 
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. 93-288, as amended (``the Stafford 
Act''). I, therefore, declare that such an emergency exists in the 
State of Kansas.
    Specifically, you are authorized to activate and deploy search 
and rescue teams to respond to this event as authorized under 
subsection 502(a) of the Stafford Act.
    In addition, you are authorized to provide such other forms of 
emergency assistance as you may deem necessary.
    Emergency assistance which you provide pursuant to this 
declaration will be at 75 percent Federal funding.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint Carolyn J. Coleman of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Kansas to 
have been affected adversely by this declared emergency disaster:

Sedgwick County

    FEMA has been authorized to activate and deploy search and 
rescue teams to respond to the explosion in Sedgwick County, Kansas, 
pursuant to Title V of the Stafford Act.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used

[[Page 35226]]

for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 
83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, 
Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, 
Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance 
Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant Program.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-17239 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# C_2013304EN.01002502.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/25

---

Action brought on 30 August 2013 — Retegal v Commission

(Case T-464/13)

2013/C 304/44

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) (represented by: F. García Martínez y B. Pérez Conde, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision by holding that the measures implemented in the Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia (Autonomous Community of Galicia) did not constitute unlawful State aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision by holding that the measures implemented in the Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia (Autonomous Community of Galicia) did not constitute unlawful State aid;

| — | in the alternative, in the event that the first head of claim is dismissed, annul the contested decision in order to conclude that RETEGAL is not a direct or indirect beneficiary of unlawful State aid; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, in the event that the first head of claim is dismissed, annul the contested decision in order to conclude that RETEGAL is not a direct or indirect beneficiary of unlawful State aid; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-463/13, Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia v Commission.

Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia

Commission

---
# C_2014061EN.01001003.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/10

---

Action brought on 10 December 2013 — The Smiley Company v OHIM (Shape of a cookie)

(Case T-656/13)

2014/C 61/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Smiley Company SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Freitag, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2013 given in Case R 997/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2013 given in Case R 997/2013-4;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The three-dimensional trade mark representing a shape of a cookie with a smiling face for goods in Classes 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 11 133 683

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected partially the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7 (1) (b) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---
CAA 

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY 

CZECH REPUBLIC 

Airport Ruzyne, 160 08 Prague 6 

tel: 420-2-33320922, fax: 420-2-20562270 

AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVE 

( 

Number: CAA-AD-T-112/1999Rl 

Supersedes CAA-AD-T-112/1 999 

Date of issue: November 23, 1999 

LET, a.s., Kunovice 

AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o., Kunovice 

L 13, L 13A, L 13AC, L 13SW, L 13SE, ++ 

SAILPLANE - TAIL-FUSELAGE ATTACHMENT FITTING -

INSPECTION/REPLACEMENT 

Applicability: Sailplane L 13, all models and serial numbers, certificated in any category. Powered sailplane 

L 13 SW Vivat, L 13 SL Vivat and L 13 SEH Vivat. all models and serial numbers, certificated in any category. 

Reason: To prevent destruction of tail-fuselage attachment fitting which can lead to loss of control of the 

sailplane. This destruction could be caused due to lower strength of the material used during production. 

Effective date: Upon receipt. 

Compliance : Action must be done prior to further flight in accordance with LET, a.s .. Mandatory Bulletin No. 

Ll3/085a dated November 17, 1999 which becomes herewith part of this AD and may be obtained from: LET. 

as., 686 04 Kunovice 1177, CZECH REPUBLIC or in accordance with AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o. Mandatory 

Bulletin No. SW 13-048a. SEH 13-005a. SL 13-004a dated November 18, 1999. which becomes herewith part of 

this AD and may be obtained from: AEROTECHNIK CZ s.r.o., 686 04 Kunovice, CZECH REPUBLIC. 

Remarks:- Where applicable, the requirements of this AD must be integrated into the Aircraft Logbook(s). 

-Address inquiries concerning this AD to: Civil Aviation Authority. Airworthiness Division, 

Ruzyne Airport, 160 08 Prague 6, Czech Republic, tel: 420 2 33320922, fax: 420 2 20562270. 

log. Pavel MATOUSEK 

Director of Airworthiness Division 

CAACZ 

CAA-AD-T-112/ 1999Rl 

1/1
No. 10-7329.

#### Tony Protopappas, Petitioner v. Mike Knowles, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1151, 131 S. Ct. 936,

178 L. Ed. 2d 777,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 594.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### Com. v. Ross1

11/17/2015

226 WAL (2015)

1

. Reconsideration Denied December 24, 2015.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 448
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                      30,663,000
<SECURITIES>                                45,482,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,553,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (23,683,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,638,000
<PP&E>                                      70,833,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,263,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             271,205,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       58,742,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 200,907,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               271,205,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,032,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,150,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,520,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             218,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (22,011,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   565,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (22,576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (22,576,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.66)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700102

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

NICHOLAS D. HATHEWAY

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Kent, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, Marine Corps 

Installations-West, MCB, Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel T. Enge,

USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 11 July 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, RUGH, and JONES, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
EX-32
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF JAMES H. ALEXANDER AND DANNIE SHAVER

                     SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Everlert, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: April 26, 2004                  By: /s/ James H. Alexander
                                       James H. Alexander, President



Dated: April 26, 2004                  By: /s/ Dannie Shaver
                                       Dannie Shaver, Secretary/Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 279 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 279

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

  Mr. Carbajal (for himself, Ms. Brownley of California, Ms. Lofgren, 
Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Cardenas, 
Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. 
   McNerney, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Speier, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. 
    Sherman, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Hill of 
  California, Mr. Takano, Mr. Levin of California, Mr. Cisneros, Mr. 
    DeSaulnier, Mr. Rouda, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Thompson of 
 California, Mr. Correa, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Sanchez, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Ruiz, 
Mr. Bera, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Torres of California, 
  Ms. Porter, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Ted Lieu of 
  California, and Ms. Bass) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``California Clean Coast Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN AREAS OF THE OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF LOCATED OFF THE COAST OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Areas of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Located Off the Coast of California.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law and except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
        conduct of oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related 
        activities is prohibited in areas of the outer Continental 
        Shelf located off the coast of the State of California.
            ``(2) Effect.--Nothing in this subsection affects any 
        rights under leases issued under this Act before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ MURRAY NICOL                          
|Murray Nicol                              
|Vice President and chief financial officer
|August 14, 2007                           



19