alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Busey, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 320]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered on or about November 20, 2000, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Sullivan, JJ.
No. 10-7472.

#### Eliezer Rosa-Carino, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1117, 131 S. Ct. 842,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9742.

178 L. Ed. 2d 572,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 615 F.3d 75.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In our capacities as Presidentand Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofStressgen Biotechnologies Corporation (the “Company”) we hereby certify basedon our respective knowledge that: (a) the enclosed Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Quarterly Report.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel L. Korpolinski                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L.  Korpolinski                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                        |
|                                        |
| /s/ Donald  D. Tartre                       |   |
| Donald D.  Tartre                           |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification of**

**the Chief Executive Officer**

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CobraElectronics Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PCS Research
Technology, Inc. (the " Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003                    By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Brian M. Overstreet
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PCS Research
Technology, Inc. (the " Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003                    By: /s/ MICHAEL H. LORBER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Michael H. Lorber
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer


                                       31
EXHIBIT 23.2

              Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-16279, 333- 52475 and 333-52477 of Escalade, Incorporated (Company) on Form
S-8 of our report dated February 18, 2005 on the consolidated financial
statements of Martin Yale International GmbH appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2004.

/s/ FALK & Co GmbH

FALK & Co GmbH
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
Steuerberatungsgesellschaft
Heidelberg/Germany,


March 13, 2007


                                       60
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11106

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MEJIA-MENDEZ, a/k/a Jose Mendez Mejia,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-31-A-3

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Mejia-Mendez has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
No. 10-6937.

#### In re Jason Earl Jones, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 586,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8780.

178 L. Ed. 2d 428,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2014052EN.01004701.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/47

---

Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Liberbank v Commission

(Case T-703/13)

2014/C 52/90

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Liberbank, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to the decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to the decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

| — | annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
<PAGE>   1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY

         El Paso Natural Gas Company (the "Company"), a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company,
resolutions were adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, declaring such amendment to be
advisable and directing that the amendment be considered at a special meeting
of stockholders of this Company.  The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

                 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of Directors
         hereby approves an amendment to the Restated Charter of this Company
         by deleting in its entirety the first sentence of Article 4 thereof,
         and by inserting in lieu thereof the provision set forth below so
         that, as so amended, the first sentence of said Article 4 shall read
         in its entirety as follows:

                          "The total number of authorized shares of all classes
                 of stock of this corporation shall consist of 275,000,000
                 shares of common stock having a par value of $3.00 per share
                 and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock having a par value of
                 $0.01 per share."

         SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to the resolution of its Board of
Directors, a special meeting of stockholders of this Company was duly called
and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), at which meeting the holders of a
majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, as required by the
DGCL and the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, voted in favor
of the amendment.

         THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.
<PAGE>   2
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said El Paso Natural Gas Company has caused this
Certificate to be signed by H. Brent Austin, its Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, and attested by David L. Siddall, its Corporate
Secretary, this 2nd day of March 1998.


                                        EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY


                                        By:
                                           --------------------------------
                                                  H. Brent Austin
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

Attest:


----------------------------
     David L. Siddall
   Corporate Secretary





                                    - 2 -
propoptngagrmt Ex 10-3




AMENDING AGREEMENT

to the

PROPERTY OPERATING AGREEMENT 



 

THIS AGREEMENT made effective as of the 16thday of November , 2004




BETWEEN:




CHUB EXPLORATION LTD. a body corporate, incorporated under the laws of British Columbia and having an office at 509 - 4438 West 10th Avenue, in the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia;




(hereafter “Chub”)




- and -




MITCHELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC, a body corporate, incorporated under the laws of British Columbia and having an office at 1028 - 470 Granville St., in the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia;




(hereafter “Services”)




-and-




MARVIN A. MITCHELL, an individual having an office at 1028 - 470 Granville St., in the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia;




(hereafter “Mitchell”)










WHEREAS:




A.      Chub, Services and Mitchell have entered into a Property Operating Agreement dated September 14, 2004




B.      Chub, Services and Mitchell desire to clarify the extent of Service’s mineral property interest pursuant to the Property Operation Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE in consideration of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration paid by each party to the other (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party), the Property Acquisition Agreement is amended as follows:




	 	1 	 
	





REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SERVICES




Paragraph 2.1;

Delete the words: “Services hereby acknowledges and confirms that it holds the Property Rights related to an undivided one hundred (100%) percent interest in the Property as at the date hereof.”

Add the words: “Intentionally left blank” 




ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement together with the Property Operating Agreement dated September 14, 2001, constitute the entire agreement to date between the parties hereto and supersedes every previous agreement, communication, expectation, negotiation, representation or understanding, whether oral or written, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. 

 

This Amending Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which, including a facsimile copy thereof, shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF this agreement has been executed as of the day and year first above written.




MITCHELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC.










Per  /s/ Marvin A. Mitchell     

       Marvin A. Mitchell










CHUB EXPLORATION LTD.







Per  /s/ Scott Young             

       Scott Young, pres













/s/ Marvin A. Mitchell                                                                                                         /s/ Erik A. Ostensoe      

Marvin A. Mitchell                    Witness





	 	2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, John W. Richardson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Qwest Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2007



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|/s/    JOHN W.
RICHARDSON                                              
|John W. Richardson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our report dated February 11, 2005, except for Notes 7 and 17, which are dated March 31, 2005, on the consolidated balancesheets of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its’ subsidiaries, Cobra Electronics Europe Limited and Cobra Electronics Hong Kong Limited, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes instockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its’ subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on Form S-8 in the company’s previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 333-63501, 333-42164, 333-42166 and 333-91078. 

 

/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 31, 2005
**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon
      Lee, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2007




/S/
      Hyung Soon Lee


Principal
      Executive Officer


Principal
      Financial Officer
No. 09-11491.

#### Willie Bruce Bryant, Petitioner v. Averitt Express, Inc.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 209,

178 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6801,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*126Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 942.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-592-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 4, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch Gateway), Post Office Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, filed 
a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP98-592-000, pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.216(b) of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to abandon by removal an 
inactive 1-inch delivery tap, authorized in blanket certificate issued 
in Docket No. CP82-430-000, all as more fully set forth in the request 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Koch Gateway proposes to abandon by removal, a 1-inch tap that 
formerly served an individual farm tap customer on behalf of Entex, 
Inc. (Entex), a local distribution company, in Jim Wells County, Texas. 
The tap is inactive since the end-user was converted to propane 
service. Entex concurs with the proposed abandonment.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16183 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEAN BRYAN,

Appellant

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2194

[June 11, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2019CA000630.

Dean Bryan, Miramar, pro se.

W. Bard Brockman of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, LLP, Atlanta, 

Georgia, and Paola Huembes of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, LLP, Miami, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.