alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned Chairmanof the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of NICInc. (the “Company) each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 6, 2007                     |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |
| /s/ Jeffery S. Fraser                     |   |   |
| Jeffery S. Fraser                         |
| Chairman of the Board  and                |
| Chief Executive Officer                   |
|                                      |
| /s/ Stephen M. Kovzan                     |   |   |
| Stephen M. Kovzan                         |
| Vice President,  Financial Operations and |
| Chief Accounting Officer                  |
|                                           |  |  |  |  |

 

----
# C_2014431EN.01001901.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 October 2014 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-268/13) (1)

1

((Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court establishing an infringement - Liquidate penalty - Judgment quantifying the amount - Recovery obligation - Undertakings subject to insolvency proceedings - Subject of the insolvency proceedings at issue - Due diligence - Burden of proof))

(2014/C 431/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1264 final of 7 March 2013 ordering the Italian Republic to pay into the ‘European Union own resources’ account the sum of EUR 1 6 5 33  000 by way of liquidate penalty.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

					
	 $300,000
	  	 	  	 December 8, 2004 

	 	  	 	  	 New York, New York


  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
TACTICA INTERNATIONAL, INC., as debtor and debtor in possession (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to Tactica Funding 1, LLC, (the “Lender”), at its principal office at 
  
                                       
                                        
               the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000), or such lesser amount as shall equal the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Loans made by
the Lender to the Borrower under the Credit Agreement (defined below), in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, on the dates and in the principal amounts provided in the Credit Agreement, and to pay
interest on the unpaid principal amount of each such Loan, at such office, in like money and funds, for the period commencing on the date of such Loan until such Loan shall be paid in full, at the rates per annum and on the dates provided in the
Credit Agreement. 
  
 The date and amount of each Loan made by the
Lender to the Borrower, and each payment made on account of the principal thereof, shall be recorded by the Lender on its books and, prior to any transfer of this Note, endorsed by the Lender on the schedule attached hereto or any continuation
thereof, provided that the failure of the Lender to make any such recordation or endorsement shall not affect the obligations of the Borrower to make a payment when due of any amount owing under the Credit Agreement or hereunder in respect of the
Loans made by the Lender. 
  
 This Note is the Note referred to in
the Credit Agreement of even date herewith (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) between the Borrower and the Lender, and evidences the Loans made by the Lender thereunder. Terms used but
not defined in this Note have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement. 
  
 The Credit Agreement provides for the acceleration of the maturity of this Note upon the occurrence of certain events and for prepayments of the Loans
upon the terms and conditions specified therein. 
  
 Except as
permitted by Section 11.4 of the Credit Agreement, this Note may not be assigned by the Lender to any other Person. 
  
 This Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	TACTICA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Avi Sivan


	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer









 SCHEDULE OF LOANS 
  

This Note evidences the Loans made under the within-described Credit Agreement to the Borrower, on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth
below, subject to the payments and prepayments of principal set forth below: 
  

												
	 Date of
 Loan

	  	 Principal
Amount of
 Loan

	  	Amount Paid or
Prepaid

	  	Unpaid
Principal
Amount

	  	Notation
Made by


	 December     , 2004
	  	$	300,000	  	$	 	  	$
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WITNESS the due execution hereof this 1st day of March, 2007.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-5918.

#### Willie Curry Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 941, 131 S. Ct. 359,

178 L. Ed. 2d 232,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7329.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 964.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                     |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: February 17, 2009 |  | /s/ Paul M. Joeckel
|                         |  | Name:               |  | Paul M. Joeckel                      
|                         |  | Title:              |  | Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
302 Certification

EXHIBIT 31.1

Date: February 11, 2004

     I, William V. Walton, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GiveMePower
Corp.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

                              /s/ William V. Walton
                                  ------------------
                                  William V. Walton
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-7004.

#### Mervin Edwards, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 913,

178 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 370.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sensurion Inc., d.b.a. Sensurion Aerospace 6400 34th Avenue, South Minneapolis, MN 55450 david.strohm@sensurion .com March 1, 2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Request to amend and allow Sensurion Inc., d.b.a. Sensurion Aerospace to utilize additional sUAS platforms underthe same direction as provided within exemption #13522, docket# FAA-2015-3542, approved November 5, 2015. Dear Sir/Madam, Sensurion Inc. (d.b.a. Sensurion Aerospace) was issued an exemption under Section 333 ofthe "FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2013) (the Reform Act) numbered 13522 (the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting sUAS operations in the market research, aerial survey and mapping and inspection industries. Sensurion Inc., hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allowfor an additional variant ofthe MP-1 (the MP-T) unmanned aircraft (UAS) to be operated in full compliance set forth in the Exemption. Sensurion Inc., requests permission to operate the following sUAS based on its type, size, weight and speed underthe same parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the Operator's Manual and Maintenance Manual: Model MP-T Conventional Fixed-wing Wingspan 

### 80"

Sensurion, Inc. Weight 11.5 #

6300-34 th Ave. South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 50 kts.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Jack, Also Known as Ernest Webb, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 173]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), rendered November 8, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court deprived him of a fair trial and his right to put on a defense when it redacted portions of a recording of a telephone call is unpre-served for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, *780the defendant’s contention is without merit. A defendant’s right to present a defense is not absolute *(see People v Hayes,*17 NY3d 46, 53 [2011]; *People v Williams,*81 NY2d 303, 313 [1993]), and the trial court has wide latitude to exclude evidence that is repetitive, is only marginally relevant, or poses an undue risk of confusion of the issues *(see People v Bowen,*67 AD3d 1022, 1023 [2009]; *People v Celifie,*287 AD2d 465 [2001]; *People v Cancel,*176 AD2d 748, 749 [1991]). Here, the Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence certain portions of a recording of a telephone call made by the defendant while he was at Rikers Island prior to trial. During the call, the defendant stated, “The [surveillance] video has my clothes in it. . . . But it don’t show my face.” This part of the call was properly admitted as an admission *(see People v Chico,*90 NY2d 585, 589 [1997]; *see also People v Grant,*17 NY3d 613, 622 [2011]; *People v O’Connor,*21 AD3d 1364, 1366 [2005]). Furthermore, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in excluding a portion of the recording in which the defendant surmised what a police officer would testify to and why that testimony would be a lie, because that portion of the recording did not modify or destroy the effect of the admission in the admitted portion of the recording *(cf. People v Dlugash,*41 NY2d 725, 736 [1977]; *People v Gallo,*12 NY2d 12, 15 [1962]; *People v Pitt,*84 AD3d 1275, 1276-1277 [2011]; *People v Rodriguez,*188 AD2d 566, 567 [1992]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that certain comments made by the prosecutor in his opening and closing statements deprived him of a fair trial, are without merit.

Rivera, J.R, Hall, Roman and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### People v Cabrera

1st Dept: 133 AD3d 495 (NY)

denied 8/1/16 (Rivera, J.)
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0129 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 05 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 13CAFN1027 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s , list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30468

JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX, Plaintiffs-Appellants

versus BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED; BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC Defendants-Appellees

**************************************************************** No. 97-30589 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX Plaintiffs-Appellants versus DUAL DRILLING COMPANY, ET AL Defendants PORTER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, doing business as International Paint Protective Coatings; COURTAULDS COATINGS INCORPORATED Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-1485)

November 3, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2447 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 672
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2447

 To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel LADY HAWK.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 21 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

           September 28 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel LADY HAWK.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
LADY HAWK, United States official number 961095.

                                                       Calendar No. 672

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel LADY HAWK

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 28 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```