# C_2014031EN.01002203.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/22 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Action brought on 29 November 2013 — ZZ v European Environment Agency (EEA)

(Case F-115/13)

2014/C 31/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Bertolini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Environment Agency (EEA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to renew the contract of the applicant and as a consequence, to reinstate the applicant to the post she held or to another suitable post or, if not, order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered and, in any case, the moral prejudice suffered.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Environment Agency dated 29 May 2013 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on 1st May 2013 |
| - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| — | as a consequence:
—
reinstate the applicant in the post which she held or in another post suitable to her competencies within EEA by way of extension of her contract in accordance with the requirements of the regulations; —
alternatively, and in the event that the claim for reinstatement set out above is not upheld, order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered, provisionally estimated ex aequo et bono at the difference between the remuneration which she received as a member of the contract agent staff within EEA at the very least for a length of time similar to that of her initial contract (three years); | — | reinstate the applicant in the post which she held or in another post suitable to her competencies within EEA by way of extension of her contract in accordance with the requirements of the regulations; | — | alternatively, and in the event that the claim for reinstatement set out above is not upheld, order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered, provisionally estimated ex aequo et bono at the difference between the remuneration which she received as a member of the contract agent staff within EEA at the very least for a length of time similar to that of her initial contract (three years); |
| - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| — | reinstate the applicant in the post which she held or in another post suitable to her competencies within EEA by way of extension of her contract in accordance with the requirements of the regulations; | | | | |
| — | alternatively, and in the event that the claim for reinstatement set out above is not upheld, order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered, provisionally estimated ex aequo et bono at the difference between the remuneration which she received as a member of the contract agent staff within EEA at the very least for a length of time similar to that of her initial contract (three years); | | | | |

| — | in any event, order the defendant to pay a provisional ex aequo et bono sum of EUR 5 000 in compensation for the non-material damage, together with late-payment interest at the statutory rate as from the date of the judgment; |
| - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| - | ------------------------------------- |

---