alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ C. Stanley BaileyC. Stanley BaileyChief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 31, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132014 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, VONZELLA YOUNG, Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of MILDRED P. SILA, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132014 COA: 259644 Osceola CC: 02-009613-NH SPECTRUM HEALTH-REED CITY CAMPUS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , W EAVER , and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

d0124 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2007

Clerk
~-

.' -

RENO NEWSPAPERS INC 

Publishers of 

Reno Gazette-Journal 

WASHOE COUNTY 

C01'1PTR{l1 I C," J ••• J .~Lt.~; 

20/2 JUN 21 AN II): 31 

955 Kuenzli St • P.O. Box 22,000. Reno, NV 89520.775.788.6200 

Legal Advertising Office 775.788.6394 

WASHOE CO 

POBOX 11130 

RENO NV 89520·0027 

STATE OF NEVADA 

COUNTY OF WASHOE 

Customer Acct# 349008 

·PO# PH 

Ad# 1000779916 

Legal Ad Cost $248.00 

Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That as the legal clerk ofthe Reno Gazette-Journal, a 

daily newspaper of general circulation published in Reno, Washoe County, State of Nevada, that 

the notice referenced below has published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper 

between the dates: 05/25/2012 - 0611912012, for exact publication dates please see last line of 

Proof of Publication below. 

Subscribed and sworn to before me i' .. "' .. ··''''''·· .. ''·''m''''''' •.. , ..... , .......... " .. '''''' .... '' ....... " .... · .. ·a , TANA CICCOTTI . 

~ Notary Public .. State of Nevada i ~ ,~o)litmElnl RtjOOrdod in W".shoo County ~ 

~ ~ro: 1)2·752fJ9--2· Enpires ~&y HS. 2Ot4~ ~, ......... "."'''' ......... " ....... , .. ".'''' ........ ''''.'''",,,'''.,,,'''', ........ ,.~ 

JUN 192012 

Proof of Publication 

NOTICE OF .PUBLIC HEARING WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH 

The Washoe County District Board of Health does hereby declare 1:00 p.m., June 28, 2012·, at 

the Washoe County Health District Conference Room B (1001 E. Ninth Street, Reno) as the· 

time, date, and place to consider the adoption of five District Board of Health Regulations 

Governing Air Quality Management for submittal to the U.S. EPA as a revision to the Washoe 

County portion of the Nevada Infrastructure State Implementation Plan tor the 2006 PM2.5 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard. These five regulations are: 030.023 (Evaluation of 

Registration Application), 030.218 (Demonstration of Compliance), 030.230 (Record Keeping), 

030.235 (Requirements for Source Sampling and Testing), and 030.970.A (Part 70 Permit 

Monitoring and Compliance). Interested persons who may be affected or wish to comment on 

any action being considered on the above date should appear at the public hearing to submit oral 

testimony or may address comments, data, views, or arguments in written form to the Washoe 

County District Board of Health, P.O. Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520. Copies oflhe regulations 

and I·SIP are available at www.washoecounty.uslhealth/aqm/home.html and at the Air Quality 

Management Division, 1001 E. Ninth Street, Suite AIlS, Reno, NV 89512 for inspection by any 

Ad Number: 1000779916 Page 1 of2 
interested person. Matt Smith, Chairman Washoe County District Board of Health No. 779916 

May 25 June 6, 19,2012 . 

. PROJECT: 

FINAL INVOICE?: .-.'- (:) 

. ACCOUNT 

NUMBER: I, .30 - "1 

VENDOR NUMBER: . 

\0- G; 

APPROVAL: 

Ad Number: 1000779916 Page 2 of2
# Federal workers celebrated at annual luncheon

/ Published May 17, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Federal workers from Columbus and Central Ohio filled the ballroom at Villa Milano May 5 for the 2016 Excellence in Government Awards luncheon. Hosted by the Federal Executive Association, the awards luncheon is held annually in conjunction with Public Service Recognition Week.The event marked the 39th year Central Ohio’s federal organizations have come together to recognize the exceptional performance public service employees provide to residents in the region. Defense Supply Center Columbus major tenants Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, and Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) were represented. Also attending were employees from the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Social Security Administration, Veterans Administration, the Small Business Administration, Department of Agriculture, and the Postal Service.“We are blessed as public servants to have the opportunity to do important work and do it well,” James McClaugherty, Land and Maritime’s acting commander, said. “Today was a huge reminder of the richly contributing things (federal workers) do day in and day out.”As in years past, numerous associates of DLA Land and Maritime were nominated for their contributions and several walked away winners. Claiming the Productivity or Process Improvement Award for an individual from a large agency was Renee M. Tucker, a purchasing agent with Maritime Supplier Operations. Also winning the top award for small agency was Anthony Hulin, DLA Fire and Emergency Services.The Innovation Award for an individual was won by Erin Roesky, a Senior Supply Systems Analyst with the Business Process Support directorate. Two teams from Land and Maritime won top honors in their categories. Joining Tucker in the Productivity or Process Improvement Award category, the Raytheon Working Group brought home first place, while the Maritime Customer Operations Army/Navy FMS Team claimed the Excellence in Customer Service Award.The purpose of the FEA is to improve coordination of federal activity within the Columbus and central Ohio region. The chapter’s goals are to improve intergovernmental cooperation and make the federal and external community aware of the federal workforce’s contributions to the operation of government and to the improvement of the local community.The local FEA chapter represents 145 federal offices and more than 16,000 employees in central Ohio, said Rebecca Beck, deputy director, DFAS. “Collectively over the past year our local FEA chapter has impacted the lives of the local community through various volunteer efforts to include Combined Federal Campaign, Feds Feed Families, Christmas Cheer with the Salvation Army and local school reading and mentoring programs.”Serving as the FEA award judges responsible for the winning selections were: Kristen Easterday, vice president, Local Government Relations, Columbus Chamber of Commerce; Beryl Piccolantonio, chief Ombudsman, Workers Compensation state of Ohio; and Charles Tennant, Sr., educator and author.
#### Kirkland, Matter of, v Annucci

2d Dept: 150 AD3d 736

denied
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MURRAY NICOL                                                    
|Murray Nicol Vice President and chief financial officer May 13, 2005



18
NO. 07-09-0064-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 20, 2009

______________________________

GUSTAVO MENDOZA GALLARDO,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees

______________________________

FROM THE 64th DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. A17752-0808; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Gustavo Mendoza Gallardo appeals from his conviction for the offense

of driving while intoxicated. On May 11, 2009, the clerk’s record was filed. The reporter’s

record was due on May 18, 2009. On May 26, 2009, this Court notified the reporter by

letter that the record had not been filed and to advise the Court of the status of the record

on or before June 5, 2009. On June 5, 2009, the reporter filed a motion for extension of
2

time to file the record, which was granted to July 6, 2009, with the admonition that no

further extensions would be granted. To date, no reporter’s record has been filed.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 64th District Court

of Hale County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine:

when the reporter’s record can reasonably be transcribed into

written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay

the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of

depriving the appellant of their right to appeal.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this

court on or before August 19, 2009. Should further time be needed by the trial court to

perform these tasks, then same must be requested before August 19, 2009.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
# C_2014448EN.01002101.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/21

---

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2014 — Ben Ali v Council

(Case T-166/13) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Extension - Consequences of an annulment of earlier freezing of funds measures - No need to adjudicate - Non-contractual liability - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2014/C 448/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France) (represented by: A. de Saint Rémy, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and A. De Elera, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, an application for annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 32, p. 20), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant and, secondly, an application for the payment of damages

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the pleas seeking annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia, in so far as that decision concerns Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the pleas seeking annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia, in so far as that decision concerns Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali.

| 2. | The remainder of the action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the action is dismissed.

| 3. | Mr Ben Ali and the Council of the European Union are each ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Ben Ali and the Council of the European Union are each ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

1

---
Attachment 1 

Cape Fear Water Balance Diagram 
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant

Water Flow Line Drawing

Storm Coal

Water

RiverCoolingH20

 Septic & 

 Stormwater

West Ash Pond

Overflow

Cape Fear R

Outfall 001 Intake

Ash

Outfall 005 East Ash Pond

Outfall 003

 Cape Fear River Canal Evaporation

Outfall 007

From Condensate Storage Tank

Exhaust Gas

River 

Cooling

H20

Coal Pile

Plant Sump 

& 

 Pumping 

Station

Reverse Osmosis 

then Electrode 

Deionizer

Boilers

Pumping 

Station

Low Volume 

Retention 

Basin (LVRB) 

with O/W 

Separator

Steam Turbines

Condensers

Condensate 

Storage Tank

Filter Plant Cooling Tower

Equipment 

Cooling

Oily 

Waste

Tank

Combustion

Turbines False Start Drain Tanks

Heat 

Recovery 

Steam 

Generator

Condensers Steam Turbines
Attachment 2 

Cape Fear Groundwater Monitoring Reports – March 2007, December 2007, April 2008, 

December 2008, and June 2009
No. 10-7508.

#### Kevin Aller, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1118, 131 S. Ct. 845,

178 L. Ed. 2d 574,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9760.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 34.
Fifth Amendment to Limited Liability Company Agreement dated January 24, 2003



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
  
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 
 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT 
 OF 
 @VENTURES PARTNERS III, LLC 
  
 THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT, effective as of the 24th day of January, 2003, to the Limited Liability Company Agreement dated as of June 30, 1999 (as amended to date, the “Agreement”), of @Ventures Partners III, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (the “LLC”), is by and among the Capital Member and the Managing Members of the LLC. Capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

  
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Members hereby amend the Agreement as follows. 
  
 1. Treatment of Denise W. Marks in Respect of Event of Termination. Effective as of January 24, 2003, Denise W. Marks’ relationship with all
Employers has terminated, and such termination constitutes an Event of Forfeiture. The Members and Ms. Marks agree that (i) such Event of Forfeiture shall not constitute a Clause Z Event, and (ii) Ms. Marks’ Vested Percentage shall equal 100%.
Therefore, effective as of the date hereof, (a) Ms. Marks’ Percentage Interest has been reduced to zero; and (b) Ms. Marks shall continue to retain her entire interest in all Investments in which she participates as of the date hereof. Ms.
Marks shall continue to be subject to all other provisions of the Agreement, including without limitation, Sections 3.0l (b)(ii) and (iii), 3.04(b)(iv), 3.04(c) and 6.06(b), and the last sentence in the definition of the term “Event of
Forfeiture.” 
  
 2. No Other Amendments. In all other
respects, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
  
 [Signature page follows.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

			
	CAPITAL MEMBER:
	
	CMG @VENTURES CAPITAL CORP.
		
	By	  	 /s/ Peter L. Gray


	Name	  	Peter L. Gray
	Title	  	Secretary


  

	
	MANAGING MEMBERS (to be executed by the
Managing Members, exclusive of Members for
whom an Event of Forfeiture has occurred):
	
	 NA


	Guy A. Bradley (Event of Forfeiture)
	
	 NA


	Jonathan Callaghan (Event of Forfeiture)
	
	 NA


	Brad Garlinghouse (Event of Forfeiture)
	
	 NA


	Andrew J. Hajducky, III (Event of Forfeiture)
	
	 NA


	Denise W. Marks (Event of Forfeiture)
	
	 /s/ Peter H. Mills


	Peter H. Mills
	
	 /s/ David J. Nerrow, Jr.


	David J. Nerrow, Jr.
	
	 /s/ Marc Poirier


	Marc Poirier
	
	 /s/ David S. Wetherell


	David S. Wetherell


  

 -2-
No. 10-262.

#### William Wilcox, et ux., Petitioners v. Jeremiah Fenn, et al.

562 U.S. 1134, 131 S. Ct. 901,

178 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 229.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 837.
No. 10-264.

#### Missouri, Petitioner v. Conrad Kruse, Jr.

562 U.S. 1134, 131 S. Ct. 901,

178 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 517.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 306 S.W.3d 603.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I,Joseph Loggia, certify that:

 

(1)   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofAdvanstar, Inc. (“the registrant”);

 

(2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

(3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)   The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   [Reserved]

 

(c)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

(5)   The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Joseph Loggia           |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----