alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2166

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Defense

to transfer certain excess equipment to educational institutions and training schools.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. WOFFORD (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the

Secretary of Defense to transfer certain excess equipment

to educational institutions and training schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN EXCESS DEPARTMENT

4 OF DEFENSE PROPERTY TO EDUCATIONAL

5 INSTITUTIONS AND TRAINING SCHOOLS.

6 (a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER.—Subsection (b)(1)

7 of section 2535(b) of title 10, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking out ‘‘and’’;
2

•S 2166 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as sub2 paragraph (H); and

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph (G):

5 ‘‘(G) notwithstanding title II of the Federal

6 Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949

7 (40 U.S.C. 481 et seq.) and any other provision of

8 law, authorize the transfer, on a nonreimbursable

9 basis, of any such property to any nonprofit edu10 cational institution or training school whenever the

11 program proposed by such institution or school for

12 the use of such property will contribute materially to

13 national defense; and’’.

14 (b) TREATMENT OF PROPERTY LOANED BEFORE

15 SEPTEMBER 30, 1993.—Except for property determined

16 by the Secretary to be needed by the Department of De17 fense, property loaned before September 30, 1993, to an

18 educational institution or training school under section

19 2535(b) of title 10, United States Code, or section 4(a)(7)

20 of the Defense Industrial Reserve Act (as in effect before

21 October 23, 1992) shall be regarded as surplus property.

22 Upon certification by the Secretary to the Administrator

23 of General Services that the property is being used by the

24 borrowing educational institution or training school for a

25 purpose consistent with that for which the property was
3

•S 2166 IS

1 loaned, the Administrator may authorize the conveyance

2 of all right, title, and interest of the United States in such

3 property to the borrower if the borrower agrees to accept

4 the property. The Administrator may require any addi5 tional terms and conditions in connection with a convey6 ance so authorized that the Administrator considers ap7 propriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16874]



[[Page 34633]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission For OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: U.S. Census--Age Search.
    Form Number(s): BC-600, BC-649(L), BC-658(L).
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0117.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 1,903 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 11,899.
    Avg Hours Per Response: BC-600 (12 minutes), BC-649(L) (6 minutes), 
BC-658(L) (6 minutes).
    Needs and Uses: The Age Search is a service provided by the Census 
Bureau for persons who need transcripts of personal data as proof of 
age for pensions, retirement plans, medicare, or Social Security 
benefits. Transcripts are also used as proof of citizenship to obtain 
passports or to provide evidence of family relationship for rights of 
inheritance. The Age Search forms gather information necessary for the 
Census Bureau to make a search of its historical population census 
records in order to provide the requested transcript.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    Legal Authority: Title 13, USC, Section 8.
    OMB Desk Officer: Nancy Kirkendall, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Nancy Kirkendall, OMB Desk Officer, room 10201, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: June 18, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-16874 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
No. 10-7167.

#### Jaime Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1075, 131 S. Ct. 675,

178 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9165.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 47.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2339 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 589
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2339

                          [Report No. 103-347]

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 29 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
WHY KNOT, United States official number 688570.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 589

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2339

                          [Report No. 103-347]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
No. 09-8888.

#### Kevin Lamar Tate, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1079, 131 S. Ct. 634,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9360.

178 L. Ed. 2d 509,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 936.
# C_2014061EN.01001701.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/17

---

Action brought on 30 December 2013 — 9Flats v OHIM — Tibesoca (9flats.com)

(Case T-713/13)

2014/C 61/30

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 9Flats GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Stoffregen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tibesoca, SL (Valencia, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 October 2013 in Case R 1671/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 October 2013 in Case R 1671/2012-2;

| — | annul the decision of OHIM’s Opposition Division of 13 July 2012 in opposition proceedings No B 1 898 686; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of OHIM’s Opposition Division of 13 July 2012 in opposition proceedings No B 1 898 686;

| — | reject the opposition to registration of the mark ‘9flats.com’ — Community trade mark application No 9 832 635 |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition to registration of the mark ‘9flats.com’ — Community trade mark application No 9 832 635

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: 9Flats GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘9flats.com’ for services in Classes 36, 38, 39 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 832 635

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Tibesoca, SL

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish figurative mark which includes the number and word elements ‘40 flats apartments’ for services in Class 43, Spanish figurative mark which includes the number and word elements ‘11 flats apartments’ for services in Class 43, and Spanish figurative mark which includes the numbers and the word element ‘50 flats’ for services in Class 43

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment in part of the decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# DLA inducts five former employees into Hall of Fame

/ Published July 15, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia,
No. 10-7221.

#### Luis Burgos-Santos, Petitioner v. Thomas LaValley, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1148, 131 S. Ct. 926,

178 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 488.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2013207EN.01004001.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/40

---

Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Orthogen v OHIM — Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente (IRAP)

(Case T-253/13)

2013/C 207/67

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Orthogen AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Finger and S. Krüger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente GmbH (Karlsfeld, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 382/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 382/2012-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘IRAP’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 5, 10, 42 and 44 — Community trade mark No 3 609 121

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Arthrex Medizinische Instrumente GmbH

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute ground for invalidity; ‘IRAP’ is a commonly used abbreviation for a certain protein which plays a significant role in certain medical and veterinary treatments.

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for a declaration of invalidity granted

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 

for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student loan 

repayment or forgiveness programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. 

YOHO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for an exclusion for assistance provided to participants 

in certain veterinary student loan repayment or forgiveness programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterinary Medicine 

5 Loan Repayment Program Enhancement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2746 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PAR2 TICIPANTS IN CERTAIN VETERINARY STU3 DENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘such Act,’’; 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert9 ing ‘‘, under section 1415A of the National Agricul10 tural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act 

11 of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or under any other State 

12 loan repayment or loan forgiveness program that is 

13 intended to provide for increased access to veteri14 nary services in such State.’’; and 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘STATE’’ in the heading and in16 serting ‘‘OTHER’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts received by an indi19 vidual in taxable years beginning after December 31, 

20 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1
                          ------------



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Envirodyne Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-10689 and 333-12829) of our report dated March
20, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedules of Envirodyne Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 26, 1996 and December 28, 1995, and for
the periods December 29, 1995 to December 26, 1996, December 30,
1994 to December 28, 1995 and January 1 to December 29, 1994, which
report is included in the annual report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 1997
No. 10-7307.

#### Hubert Arvie, Petitioner v. Robert C. Tanner, Warden.

562 U.S. 1150, 131 S. Ct. 934,

178 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 460,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Agency conducting 90-day review to shape new strategic plan

/ Published March 14, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at every major subordinate command and headquarters directorate are being asked to participate in a bottom-up review of their team’s ability to effectively and efficiently support warfighters while preparing for future missions.

The assessments will measure agency strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, referred to as SWOT in the McKinsey 7-S framework being used to guide the analysis. The results are expected to help shape the 2024-2029 DLA Strategic Plan.

In a March 1 memorandum announcing the 90-day review, DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Mark Simerly said the agency must set the conditions to transform as it faces challenges like contested logistics, rapidly advancing technologies and global power competition.

“The assessment will be a product of our collective wisdom to continue moving the agency forward. I expect DLA leaders to be personally involved in this opportunity for organizational learning and improvement,” he said.

The 7-S model is designed to help leaders identify and manage organizational change in seven areas: structure, strategy, systems, shared values, style, staff and skills.

Teams should review strategic documents related to their business or operations to identify potential gaps and opportunities that align with priorities set by national and Defense Department priorities.

Employees are also encouraged to use information already gleaned through recent agency-level reviews to inform their analyses. Examples include the DLA Culture and Climate Survey and the Defense Agency and Department of Defense Field Activity Review. Customer feedback to the Customer Interaction Center, Service Day events, and other engagements with customers and industry partners may also help frame employee input.

DLA Transformation is leading the effort and conducting weekly sessions to assist agency-wide staffs as they work to complete their input by noon April 15. DLA Transformation will then compile the data for presentation to senior leaders for review and approval.

Simerly noted that assessments aren’t new to DLA.

“As leaders, we welcome such opportunities to continually improve to better support the warfighter to sharpen our effectiveness and efficiency,” he said.
# C_2013298EN.01001104.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/11

---

Order of the General Court of 14 August 2013 — Nordex Holding v OHIM — Fontana Food (Taverna)

(Case T-302/13) (1)

1

2013/C 298/21

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DOLORES MILLS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1975

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 25, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Boiler MACT Docket

Docket ID:  EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2002‐0058

FROM: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE: December 2012

SUBJECT:   OMB E.O. 12866 Meeting with CIBO, December 18, 2012

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) held an E.O. 12866 regulatory review with U.S.

EPA and the Council of Industrial Boiler Owners (CIBO) on December 18, 2012.  The following

items were discussed during this meeting:

1. See attached file:  CIBO‐OMB Meeting 12‐18‐12 Final.pdf

2. See attached file:  final CIBO Boiler MACT HCl Analysis Dec 2012.pdf

3. See attached file:  MATS CO Work Practice CIBO OMB.pdf

4. See attached file:  PM CEMS CIBO OMB.pdf
Air Logistics Complex commander thanks DLA for contributions to Air Force award
 
  By DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  “The Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex wouldn't have been successful
without your teamwork and your willingness to fight by our sides.”Those are sentiments expressed by United States Air
Force Brig. Gen. Walter Lindsley, WR-ALC commander, to all Defense Logistics
Agency tenants co-located with the WR-ALC at Robins Air Force Base.The WR-ALC was named
Category 4 Depot winner of the Air Force Materiel Command’s 2015 Maintenance
Effectiveness Award. Lindsley attributes the accolades partially to the supply chain's
role.DLA Distribution Warner Robins,
specifically, provided direct support to the 402nd Aircraft Maintenance Group
and its C5, C17, C130 and F15 missions to maintenance the aircraft then return
them to Air Force inventory in the required time. According to Lindsley, it is thanks to the distribution center's
efforts that the Air Maintenance Group squadron commanders and their forward
logistics specialists received emergency and routine aircraft parts to the
Programmed Depot maintenance lines as well as the Aircraft Functional Test areas
for each aircraft. DLA Distribution Warner Robins located and processed $25 million in
aircraft frame parts for the C-5 Aircraft Group alone. As acknowledged by Air Force Col. Rod Bloker, commander, DLA
Aviation at Warner Robins, "Airpower starts with DLA."
# Methods and Key Words

# Literature

# Abbreviations and Acronyms
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.







February
      6, 2009
            /s/
      WILLIAM R. WALKERWilliam
      R. WalkerChief
      Financial Officer