alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA police officers participate in bike ride to honor the fallen, remember the survivors

/ Published May 20, 2016

Two DLA police officers participated in the Law Enforcement United “Road to Hope Memorial Bicycle Ride” from Chesapeake to Arlington, Virginia, May 10-12. Staff Sgt. James Sprecher was one of 300 police officers who biked 250 miles over three days while Lt. James Haaf and about 80 others served in support roles. The annual charity event is a prelude to National Police Week, May 15-21.

Riders from the Virginia Division of the LEU joined 130 bicyclists from the Pennsylvania Division and 70 riders from the New Jersey Division for a ceremony at the Iwo Jima Memorial May 11. The Pennsylvania riders started their ride in Reading while the New Jersey riders biked from Atlantic City. LEU sponsors the event each year to raise awareness of law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty and to raise funds for programs that support surviving family members. 

Riders rode with bracelets in honor of the 123 officers killed in the line of duty last year. Sprecher rode for Cpl. William Solomon, a Georgia Ports Authority police officer who was directing traffic when he was struck by a drunk driver last March.

Sprecher and Haaf also had more personal reasons to participate in the ride. “We participated in honor of Lt. Haaf’s father, a police officer from Minneapolis who was killed in the line of duty in 1992,” Sprecher said. “He’s the reason we both got involved with this event.”

All participants, riders and support personnel, raised funds in the months leading up to the “Road to Hope” bike ride. 

“Our participants raised over $300,000 this year,” said John Mapes, president of the LEU Virginia Division. “And we are a true charity — all our staff members are volunteers.”   

“One of the charity recipients is an organization called ‘Concerns of Police Survivors’,” Haas said. “They fund a summer camp for children of fallen officers where they can participate in camp activities with other kids who are going through the same thing.” 

According to the website, the camp also provides grief counseling and sets the kids up with a support system of peers for when they leave.

The LEU’s mission is to honor the service and sacrifice of all law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty and remember the survivors left behind.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 3(a)(3)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                 EDO CORPORATION

                Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law

      The undersigned, being Secretary and Vice-President, Administration, of
EDO Corporation, hereby certifies:

      1. The name of the Corporation is EDO Corporation. The name under which
the Corporation was originally incorporated was Edo Aircraft Corporation.

      2. The Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the
Department of State on October 16, 1925.

      3. A Restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the
Department of State on November 23, 1983.

      4. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as now in effect, is further
amended as set forth below, as authorized by Section 801 of the Business
Corporation Law, to increase the aggregate number of Common Shares, par value $1
per share, which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue from
25,000,000 to 50,000,000.

      5. In order to accomplish the foregoing, the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

      The first sentence of Article THIRD of the Restated Certificate of
      Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

            The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have
            authority to issue is 50,500,000 shares, of which 50,000,000 shares
            shall be designated as Common Shares, par value $1 per share, and
            500,000 shall be designated as Preferred Shares, par value $1 per
            share.

      6. The foregoing Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
was authorized by the affirmative vote of the majority of holders of outstanding
shares of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon at a meeting of the
shareholders held on May 7, 2002.



<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has made and subscribed this
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation and affirmed it as
true under penalties of perjury, this 17th Day of May, 2002.


                               /s/ William J. Frost
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               William J. Frost
                               Secretary and Vice-President, Administration


                                        2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6330

HELEN FRANCES TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-95-960-2)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helen Frances Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent

that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a

certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Taylor v. Angelone, No. CA-95-960-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 16, 1996

& Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
Report of EDO Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ JAMES M. SMITH
                                  -----------------------
                                  James M. Smith
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  December 5, 2003

                                  /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
                                  -----------------------
                                  Frederic B. Bassett
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  December 5, 2003
# C_2016335EN.01000602.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Citroën Commerce GmbH v Zentralvereinigung des Kraftfahrzeuggewerbes zur Aufrechterhaltung lauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. (ZLW)

(Case C-476/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directives 98/6/EC and 2005/29/EC - Consumer protection - Advertisement containing an indication of price - Concepts of ‘offer’ and ‘price inclusive of taxes’ - Obligation to include in the price of a motor vehicle the additional costs necessarily incurred in connection with the transfer of the vehicle))

(2016/C 335/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Citroën Commerce GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Zentralvereinigung des Kraftfahrzeuggewerbes zur Aufrechterhaltung lauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. (ZLW)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers, read in conjunction with Article 1 and Article 2(a) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that costs in connection with the transfer of a motor vehicle from the manufacturer to the dealer, which are payable by the consumer, must be included in the selling price of that vehicle indicated in an advertisement made by the trader when, having regard to all the features of that advertisement, in the eyes of the consumer it sets out an offer concerning that vehicle. It is for the referring court to determine whether all those conditions are satisfied.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1



      RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Nine months    Three months
(Dollars in thousands)                              Ended          ended
                                                 November 30,   February 28,               Years ended November 30
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------------------------------------------
                                                    1998            1998        1997         1996           1995          1994
                                                    ----            ----        ----         ----           ----          ----

<S>                                                <C>          <C>             <C>         <C>           <C>            <C>
Income (loss) before taxes, extraordinary
  items and accounting changes                     (19,064)           4,907     14,046      674,656       (934,871)      53,749
                                                   -------       ----------   --------      -------       --------       ------

Fixed Charges:
  Interest                                          36,313            6,940     31,261        3,083          1,926        1,809
  Interest factor portion of rentals                   854              199      1,043          828            612          500
                                                   -------       ----------   --------      -------       --------       ------

     Total fixed charges                            37,167            7,139     32,304        3,911          2,538        2,309
                                                   -------       ----------   --------      -------       --------       ------

Earnings before income taxes and
  fixed charges                                     18,103           12,046     46,350      678,567       (932,333)      56,058
                                                   =======       ==========   ========      =======       ========       ======

Preferred stock dividends                            7,382               --         --           --             --           --

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred stock dividends                       0.41             1.69       1.43       173.50        (367.35)       24.28
                                                   =======       ==========   ========      =======       ========       ======

Earnings inadequate to cover fixed charges
  and preferred stock dividends                    (26,446)                                               (934,871)
                                                   =======                                                ========
</TABLE>
# DLA officials announce 2014 agency Hall of Fame inductees   

/ Published May 15, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia,       - Stephen Byus, a former supervisory supply specialist with DLA Land and Maritime who was killed in the line of duty in Kabul, Afghanistan, in September.
      - Richard Connelly, a retired member of the Senior Executive Service who held several senior positions within DLA, including Defense Energy Supply Center (now DLA Energy) director, DLA Support Services (now DLA Installation Support) director, and DLA comptroller.
      - Retired Army Lt. Gen. Robert Dail, who served as DLA director from August 2006 to November 2008 and led the transfer of logistics functions from the services to DLA mandated by the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Act.  
      - Mae DeVincentis, a retired member of the Senior Executive Service whose 37-year career saw her rise from a GS-2 up to DLA’s chief information officer and ultimately the agency’s first civilian vice director.
      - Ivan Hall, who entered federal service in 1979 retired in 2009 as deputy director of Land Supplier Operations in Defense Supply Center Columbus, Ohio, now DLA Land and Maritime.
No. 10-7645.

#### Jesus Norberto Evans-Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 956,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 435.

178 L. Ed. 2d 788,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 635.
No. 10-6039.

#### Joshua I. Villalobos, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 1141, 131 S. Ct. 901,

178 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 169.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 225 Ariz. 74, 235 P.3d 227.
No. 10-7661.

#### Andrew Jerome Malcolm, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1157, 131 S. Ct. 957,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 284.

178 L. Ed. 2d 789,

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 964.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Superior Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James A. WhiteJames A. WhiteChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
160 A.3d 704

#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. M.C., DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF M.C., M.C., JR., AND A.C., MINORS-CROSS-PETITIONERS.

February 13, 2017

ON CROSS PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A cross-petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is denied.
#### Rosemary Almeda, Appellant, v Michael Hopper, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 884]

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), dated May 21, 2002, which, after a nonjury trial, and upon decisions of the same court dated December 19, 2001, and February 13, 2002, inter alia, awarded custody of the parties’ two sons to the defendant husband, awarded the defendant husband 100% of his retirement benefits, imputed an annual income of only $63,689.40 to the defendant husband for purposes of determining the award of child support, and denied her application for an award of maintenance.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the judgment as awarded custody of the parties’ older son to the defendant is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Any arguments that the plaintiff makes concerning custody of and visitation with the parties’ older son are academic, as he has reached the age of majority *(see Belsky v Belsky, 172*AD2d 576 [1991]; *Berk v Berk,*170 AD2d 564, 565 [1991]). Moreover, the court’s decision to award custody of the younger son to the defendant has a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 174 [1982]; *Vinciguerra v Vinciguerra,*294 AD2d 565, 566 [2002]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in equitably distributing the marital assets *(see Sebag v Sebag,*294 AD2d 560 [2002]), and in denying the plaintiffs application for maintenance *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a] [1]; *Mica v Mica,*275 AD2d 765, 766 [2000]).

The court’s decision to impute an annual income to the defendant of only $63,689.40 is supported by the record *(see Casey v Casey,*289 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.
II

Calendar No. 617

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2438

To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation

through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. SARBANES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. PELL, without amendment

A BILL

To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment

Corporation through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OPIC Amendments

5 Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2438 IS

1 SEC. 2. RAISING CEILING ON INSURANCE.

2 Section 235(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

3 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(1)) is amended by striking

4 ‘‘$9,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,000,000,000’’.

5 SEC. 3. RAISING CEILING ON INVESTMENT GUARANTEES.

6 Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

7 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(2)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking subparagraph (B);

9 (2) by striking ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘GUARANTEES.—’’;

10 and

11 (3) by striking ‘‘$2,500,000,000’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘$5,000,000,000’’.

13 SEC. 4. EXTENDING ISSUING AUTHORITY.

14 Section 235(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of

15 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195(a)(3)) is amended by striking

16 ‘‘1994’’ and inserting ‘‘1995’’.

17 SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

18 Section 235 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

19 (22 U.S.C. 2195) is amended by striking subsection (g).

Calendar No. 617

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2438

A BILL

To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private

and for other purposes.Investment Corporation through fiscal year 1995,

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
Unit conducts valuable training while helping reduce backlog
 
  By Navy Lt. Matthew Willis and Navy Lt. j.g. Joe Jankord
CC: Debbie Rabin (drabin@mde.state.md.us)CC: Diane Franks (dfranks@mde.state.md. us)

CC: frankfordharold@epa.gov (frankford.harold@epa.gov)

CC: linden.melissa@epa.gov (lindenmelissa@epa.gov)

To: ranbordner@state.pa.us (ranbordner@state.pa.us)

CC: Roger Thunell (rthunell@mde.statemd.us)

CC: Sally Frampton (sframpton@mde.state.md.us)

CC: Tad Aburn (gaburn@mde.state.md.us)

Third-Party Downloaded

Third-Party DownloadedTransferred

Transferred

Transferred

Third-Party Downloaded

Read

Third-Party Downloaded

11/1/20124:14 AM11/1/20124:12 AM

1013112012 3:04 PM 2.0.0 message relayed

10/31/2012 3:04 PM 2.0.0 message relayed

10/31/2012 3:02 PM

11/1/20124:45 AM

11/2/2012 9:11 AM

11/1/20124:18 AM

file:///C:fLJsers/jwilkinson/AppDatalLocal/Temp/XPgrpwise/50913 D6E MDEDOMpo2lin... 11/30/2012
.

. .7

lit e

.7

• .••

• H.

4