alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-7228.

#### Pedro Roman, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1095, 131 S. Ct. 804,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9566.

178 L. Ed. 2d 538,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 996 A.2d 554.
# DLA Distribution Commanding General and staff declare commitment to ending sexual assault in the workplace

/ Published April 20, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
As part of April Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention month, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Commanding General, Brig. Gen. Keith Reventlow, USMC, and Deputy Commander, Perry Knight, Senior Executive Service, signed a proclamation affirming the commitment to end sexual assault in the workplace.

01:38VIDEO  | 01:38 |DLA Distribution sexual assault prevention message

“Sexual assault is a scourge that impacts every individual,” said Reventlow. “We take pride in creating a work environment that treats everyone with dignity and respect, which is why we have a zero-tolerance policy for sexual assault within our workforce.”

In addition to Reventlow and Knight, each distribution center commander and deputy have also signed their own proclamation, committing their names and efforts to creating a workplace free of sexual assault.

DLA Distribution employees have been invited to participate in a variety of activities to raise awareness regarding sexual assault prevention.

The virtual teal ribbon relay, teal Tuesdays and denim Fridays are ways employees can participate together, though distant, in raising awareness about the zero-tolerance policy DLA Distribution holds regarding sexual assault.

More information regarding these Distribution wide events can be found in this pamphlet.

For questions about any of these events featured, or to speak confidentially with our Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, please contact:
      - DLA Distribution SARC East, Rachel Nolan at Rachel.Nolan@dla.mil
      - DLA Distribution SARC West, Majeeda Gathers at Majeeda.Gathers@dla.mil

DLA has a team of credentialed sexual assault response coordinators available to you 24/7. The DLA SAPR hotline is 1-800-841-0937.
No. 10-6988.

#### Mitchell Moore, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 1143, 131 S. Ct. 912,

178 L. Ed. 2d 762,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 304.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lucas County, denied.
# DLA Energy Worldwide Energy Conference to return

/ Published Aug. 3, 2016
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
After a seven-year hiatus, Defense Logistics Agency Energy is bringing back the Worldwide Energy Conference to the Gaylord National Hotel and Convention Center, National Harbor, Maryland April 10-12, 2017.

“We have taken the initiative to ‘revive’ the DLA Energy Worldwide Energy Conference which has been dormant since 2010,” said Bruce Blank, DLA Energy Procurement Process Support director. “The “new” WWEC and trade show will be a terrific opportunity to discuss the latest energy strategies, best industry practices, installation energy management, contract processes, interagency initiatives, bulk petroleum and direct delivery engagements worldwide, and alternative fuel and renewable energy technologies and capabilities.”

The conference’s theme will be “Refining Global Energy Strategies”. 

The conference and trade show draws from the entire spectrum of the energy supply chain and provides an exclusive opportunity for Department of Defense employees, contractors, the military services peers and leaders, and top industry experts to congregate to discuss current trends and initiative in the petroleum, alternative fuel and renewable energy fields.

Keynote speakers, plenary session, panels, breakout sessions and exhibitors will offer the opportunity to learn about the latest trends and technologies in the energy industry and how the federal government, specifically DoD, which is becoming a more efficient and environmentally friendly consumer of energy products. 

“The conference promises to reach new heights in featuring distinguished government and industry speakers addressing a multitude of energy issues,” Blank said.

A toll free number, 844-883-5697, is available for more information.
#### Hugo I. Palma, Appellant, v Anthony A. Douglas et al., Respondents.

[65 NYS3d 712]

*562Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered June 9, 2016, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied plaintiffs motion as the evidence, including the parties’ conflicting accounts as to how the accident occurred and the police accident report, presents triable issues of fact as to who was at fault for the accident *(see e.g. Geralds v Damiano,*128 AD3d 550 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                      (PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed by AF Financial Group (the "Company") for the quarter ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



                                         AF FINANCIAL GROUP


Dated February 13, 2003                  By: /s/ James A. Todd
                                             ----------------------------------
                                         James A. Todd
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated February 13, 2003                  By: /s/ Melanie Paisley Miller
                                             ----------------------------------
                                         Melanie Paisley Miller
                                         Executive Vice President, Secretary,
                                         Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-5811.

#### Madyun Abdulhasseb, aka Jerry L. Thomas, Petitioner v. Sam Calbone, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 967, 131 S. Ct. 469,

178 L. Ed. 2d 298,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8090.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 1301.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Employment
Agreement previously entered into by George J. Harad (“Executive”) and Boise
Cascade Corporation, now named OfficeMax Incorporated (the “Company”, and
together with the Executive the “Parties”) is made and entered into by the
Parties effective on the date last signed.


 


Recitals


 


Whereas, the Parties recognize uncertainties
introduced by passage of the American Jobs Creation Act; and


 


Whereas, the Parties wish to clarify the
benefits to Executive and costs to the Company of their prior Agreement,
without affecting the actuarial value of those benefits or costs.


 


Agreement


 


Now, Therefore, in consideration of the
mutual promises and covenants contained herein, it is hereby agreed by and between
the Parties hereto as follows:


 


1.  The last sentence of Paragraph 3(c)
of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted.


 


2. 
Paragraph 4(f) of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its
entirety by the following:


 


“4(f)  Pension
Benefits.  In addition to any pension benefits to which Executive may be
entitled under the Company’s Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Qualified
Plan”), and under the Company’s Excess Benefit Plan and Supplemental Early
Retirement Plan (the “Nonqualified Plans”), the Company will pay to Executive a
monthly payment in the amount of $47,859.11 for a period of 120 consecutive
months commencing the month following the earlier of Executive’s termination or
the Separation Date; provided that in no event shall such monthly payments
commence prior to the time they would be in compliance with the distribution
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
and the regulations promulgated thereunder.”


 


In Witness Whereof, the Parties have duly authorized
and caused this First Amendment to be executed on the dates written below.


 


 


	
  OfficeMax Incorporated

  	
  George J. Harad

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Ward W. Woods

  	
   

  	
  /s/ George J. Harad

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Ward W. Woods

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  December 10, 2004

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  12/13/04
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2637 

To prevent the Secretary of Homeland Security from closing certain 

international field offices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, and Miss RICE of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prevent the Secretary of Homeland Security from closing 

certain international field offices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Overseas 

5 Immigration Services Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS DIVISION. 

7 The Secretary of Homeland Security may not close 

8 or consolidate any field office of the International OperVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:38 May 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2637.IH H2637

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2637 IH

1 ations Division of the Refugee, Asylum, and International 

2 Operations Directorate of the United States Citizenship 

3 and Immigration Services unless the Secretary obtains the 

4 approval of the Committee on the Judiciary and the Com5 mittee on Homeland Security of the House of Representa6 tives and the Committee on the Judiciary and the Com7 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

8 of the Senate. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
No. 10-483.

#### M. R. Mikkilineni, Petitioner v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering Co., Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1109, 131 S. Ct. 826,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9726.

178 L. Ed. 2d 557,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 256.
No. 10-14.

#### Professional Medical Education, Inc., Petitioner v. Palm Beach County Health Care District, et al.

562 U.S. 889, 131 S. Ct. 391,

178 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6762.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 13 So. 3d 1090.
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael E. Kalogris, President and Chief Executive Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
S91A0130.

#### DISMUKE v. THE STATE.

(403 SE2d 812)

Smith, Presiding Justice.

The appellant, Marvin Dewayne Dismuke, shot and killed Francisco Luna at Pop’s Game Room in Moultrie, Georgia. An exchange of words escalated into a confrontation in which Dismuke initially wielded a pool cue, and the victim wielded a chair. It ended when Dismuke shot the victim with a .25 caliber handgun. The victim apparently was not armed with a firearm or a knife, although a knife was recovered from a trash can. The investigating officers recovered the murder weapon from Maul’s Pond, where Peggy Hunter had thrown it at the request of Dismuke. The victim died of a single gunshot wound to his head. The appellant was convicted of felony murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.1 We affirm.

1. The appellant contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a verdict of felony murder as required by *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

The Court does not weigh or resolve conflicts in trial testimony when the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. *Booker v. State,*257 Ga. 37 (354 SE2d 425) (1987). The Court determines whether the evidence presented was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*supra. In arriving at this conclusion, the Court considers the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. *Adams v. State,*255 Ga. 356 (338 SE2d 860) (1986). Applying the law, as set out above, to the facts of this case, we find no error.

2. Appellant charges in his second enumeration of error that the court’s instructions on felony murder were neither correct nor complete.

The court’s charge substantially followed the language of the statute and was legally sufficient. *Johnston v. State,*232 Ga. 268, 272 (5) (206 SE2d 468) (1974).

3. The trial court is not required to charge on the impeachment of witnesses absent a prior written request. There was no such request. *State v. Stonaker,*236 Ga. 1 (222 SE2d 354) (1976).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*255Decided May 13, 1991.

*Short & Fowler, Larkin M. Fowler, Jr.,*for appellant.

*H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,*for appellee.

1

 The crime was committed on May 19, 1990. The appellant was indicted on June 28, 1990. The Colquitt County jury found the appellant guilty of felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime on August 16, 1990. A motion for new trial was filed on August 30, 1990. That motion was denied on September 25, 1990. The notice of appeal was filed on October 23, 1990 and the transcript was filed in this Court on October 24, 1990. The record was docketed on October 26, 1990 and the case was submitted for decision without oral argument on November 15, 1990.
#### In the Matter of De’Lyn D.W., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Liza Carmen T, Appellant; Mercy-First, Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 53]

Resettled order, Family Court, New York County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about May 27, 2015, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject child, and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services *600for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to plan for the child’s future, despite diligent efforts by the agency to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (Social Services Law § 384-b [7]). The agency fulfilled its duty to make diligent efforts to provide respondent with assistance by developing a comprehensive service plan to address respondent’s hoarding problem, maintaining frequent contact with her, ensuring her participation in scheduled services, and facilitating her visits and contact with the child. “The parent must assume some measure of initiative and responsibility [and] [t]he agency will be deemed to have fulfilled its duty if its reasonable efforts are rebuffed by an uncooperative or indifferent parent” *(Matter of Imani Elizabeth W.,*56 AD3d 318, 319 [1st Dept 2008] [citation omitted]).

Despite the agency’s meaningful efforts, respondent failed to plan for the future of the child by demonstrating a complete lack of insight regarding her inability to provide the child with a safe and appropriate home *(see Matter of Jennifer S.,*61 AD3d 613, 614 [1st Dept 2009]). Respondent failed to correct the unsanitary and unsafe conditions in her apartment over a four-year period, and failed to account for the well-being of the child in foster care by repeatedly violating the visitation orders and making comments to the child about her foster mother *(see Matter of Jonathan NN. [Michelle OO.],*90 AD3d 1161, 1163-1164 [3d Dept 2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 808 [2012]).

A preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing supported the determination that the best interests of the child warranted termination of respondent’s parental rights so as to facilitate adoption.

We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.R, Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
No. 10-6852.

#### Eddie David Cox, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8669.

178 L. Ed. 2d 424,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Subsistence supports Peshmerga forces fighting ISIL

/ Published Aug. 8, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Peshmerga forces in northern Iraq are receiving food items to support their efforts in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, thanks to Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence. 

The Subsistence team and their regional prime vendor Anham are supporting 33,000 Peshmerga troops for nine months with basic food items: three types of beans, tomato paste, rice, flour, sugar, cooking oil and tea.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter said in April that the U.S. would allot up to $415 million to the Kurdish Peshmerga forces to pay for ammunition, food, salaries and medical equipment in their fight against ISIL. Of this allotment, $20 million was designated for food support.

Carter said the Peshmerga have been one of the most effective fighting forces against ISIL.

"DLA has been a huge asset to the Peshmerga by supporting them," said Army Capt. Chad Brooks, a logistics adviser to the Peshmerga. “Without this assistance, the Pesh would be hindered in their fight against [ISIL].”

The Subsistence team worked closely with Task Force Falcon, the U.S. Army task force responsible for operational and logistical support in Iraq, to coordinate the sourcing, loading and delivery of products.

The Subsistence team also faced a limited amount of time to implement the support. The first food delivery was scheduled during Ramadan, a holy month for Muslims which consists of limited work hours.

The Peshmerga also only accept food from Kurdish companies, so Kurdish truck drivers had to be found to transport deliveries. And the food has to be manually unloaded because they don’t have the equipment to palletize products.

The second delivery consisted of 33 trucks that carried approximately 1.7 million pounds of product into the Peshmerga warehouse July 24-28.

For their effort, the Subsistence OCONUS prime vendor team was named DLA Troop Support’s Team of the Quarter for their commitment and service to the customer and to the warfighters.
No. 10-6863.

#### In re Carlayne Sims, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 824,

178 L. Ed. 2d 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9656,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.