alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Americas at San Pedro personnel demonstrate resiliency

/ Published Sept. 2, 2016
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Arizona, 
Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas at San Pedro, California, employees showed effective distribution management during a supply chain disruption and demonstrated resiliency in the Jet A aviation fuel supply chain at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.

A contractor at the base was performing soil excavation, as part of a military construction project, with a backhoe and hit the on-base pipeline connecting the bulk fuel tanks to the on-base truck fill stand which supports aircraft refueling operations Aug. 1.

In coordination with Air Force customers and commercial energy partners, DLA Energy Americas at San Pedro employees were able to realign the supply chain to meet the requirements while pipeline was being repaired. 

“Through our continued partnerships with the military services and our commercial partners, DLA Energy Americas at San Pedro is able to provide agile, flexible and responsive solutions during supply chain disruptions,” said Timothy Hutson, Americas at San Pedro operations officer. “The ability to analyze supply chain nodes and develop mitigation strategies is a key skill set for our energy logisticians to not only meet the needs of our customers, but allow [the organization] to meet the goals of the Director's Strategic Plan as well.”

The realignment prevented any degradation in mission capabilities at Luke Air Force Base. Fuel trucks were preloaded at the Arizona Air National Guard Base at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix. In total, twenty fuel trucks from Luke Air Force Base used the Air National Guard Base loading facility to preload jet fuel for flight operations. To compensate for the additional demand at airport, Americas at San Pedro personnel arranged for additional commercial deliveries from Defense Fuel Support Point Davis-Monthan in Tucson, Arizona, mitigating any operational degradation to Sky Harbor's mission.

Luke Air Force Base resumed using a smaller bulk storage tank and was able to resupply the on-base truck fill stand for aircraft issues. The base fuels personnel were able to process more frequent daily receipts and keep up with their daily demand and support routine flight operations.

“[Air Force] Maj. Justin Settles, DLA Energy Americas at San Pedro commander, has made developing new and fostering current relationships with energy partners, a key priority for DLA Energy Americas at San Pedro and our ability to quickly respond to Luke Air Force Base's disruption highlights this,” Hutson said. “This was a total team effort between our Mission Support, Supplier Operations, and Quality Operations divisions.”

Repairs to the on-base pipeline were completed and the bulk fuel system returned to full service Aug. 16.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Board of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary 
Education; Meeting

AGENCY: National Board of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary 
Education, Education.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 16, 1998 a notice of the proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Board of the Fund for the 
Improvement of Postsecondary Education was published in the Federal 
Register (63 FR 32866-32867).
    This notice corrects the times allocated for the closed and open 
sessions. The correct times for the closed sessions are from 8:30 a.m. 
to 12:00 p.m., and from 2:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. The correct time for the 
open session is from 12:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Karelis, U.S. Department of 
Education, 600 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 3100, ROB #3, Washington, 
DC 20202-5175. Telephone: (202) 708-5750. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8:00 a.m. 
and 8:00 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
    Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an 
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer 
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding 
paragraph

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 98-17139 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
#### People v Taft

3d Dept: 145 AD3d 1090 (Broome)

denied 3/1/17 (Fahey, J.)
<TABLE>
                                     EXHIBIT 11

                               DynCorp and Subsidiaries
                      Computations of Earnings Per Common Share
                    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>

         Primary and Fully Diluted                  1996          1995       1994(a)
<S>                                           <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings:
 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
  before extraordinary item                   $   11,949      $  5,274   $    (352)
 Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations      2,680           (20)    (12,479)
 Extraordinary loss                                    -        (2,886)          -
 Net earnings (loss)                          $   14,629      $  2,368   $ (12,831)
 Preferred stock Class C dividends
  not declared or recorded                        (2,284)       (1,915)     (1,606)
 Common stockholders' share of earnings (loss)$   12,345      $    453   $ (14,437)

Shares:
 Weighted average common shares outstanding    8,066,846     7,884,542   6,230,027
 Weighted average common shares issuable
  upon exercise of warrants                    3,239,894     3,310,536           -
 Weighted average common shares deferred
  under Restricted Stock Plan                    394,835       550,173     571,985
 Weighted average common shares issuable
  upon exercise of stock options                  34,696             -           -
                                              11,736,271    11,745,251   6,802,012

Net earnings (loss) per common share:
 Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
  before extraordinary item                   $     0.82      $   0.29   $   (0.29)
 Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations       0.23          0.00       (1.83)
 Extraordinary loss                                    -         (0.25)          -
 Common stockholders' share of earnings (loss)$     1.05      $   0.04   $   (2.12)


(a)  Restated for the discontinuance of the Commercial Aviation business.

</TABLE>
##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



th
 GENITOPE CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Dan W. Denney, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
Dan W. Denney, Jr.
 ATTEST:By:
    
    /s/ Laura Randall Woodhead

Laura Randall Woodhead
Secretary




---



##### 



Certificate of Amendment  of  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation  of  Genitope Corporation
 Genitope Corporation, :
 First:
 Second:
 IV.
 A.
 FOURTH
 FIFTH
 [Signature Page Follows]




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof, Genitope Corporation th
 Genitope CorporationBy:
    /s/ Dan W. Denney, Jr.Dan W. Denney, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015046EN.01004601.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Heli-Flight v EASA

Heli-Flight

EASA

(Case T-102/13) (1)

1

((Civil aviation - Application for approval of flight conditions for a Robinson R66 helicopter - Rejection decision of the EASA - Action for annulment - Scope of the Board of Appeal’s review - Scope of the Court’s review - Action for failure to act - Non-contractual liability))

(2015/C 046/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG (Reichelsheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Kittner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (represented by: T. Masing and C. Eckart, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of the EASA of 13 January 2012 rejecting the applicant’s application for approval of flight conditions submitted for a Robinson R66 helicopter (serial number 0034); secondly, application for a declaration that the EASA failed to act concerning the processing of the applicant’s applications of 11 July 2011 and 10 January 2012 concerning that helicopter and, thirdly, claim that the EASA should make good the damage that the applicant considers it has suffered because of that rejection decision and that alleged failure to act.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6675.

#### Michael Gross, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 540,

178 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8436.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### People v Clairmont

App Div, 3d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 76972(U) (Saratoga)

dismissed 8/29/16 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-6277.

#### Billy Thomas Pearson, Petitioner v. Joel Herron, Correctional Administrator, Scotland Correctional Institution.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 570,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8747.

178 L. Ed. 2d 417,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 288.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.02    
    


        2005 ELECTIVE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT
  VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


Pursuant
to the Valero Energy Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"): 



	o	 	I elect not to participate in the Plan during 2005.
	

o	
 	
I hereby elect to defer a portion of my compensation for the period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2005 as follows:
	

 	
 	
Salary (elect either 1 or 2)
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

1.	
 	

      % (in even 1% increments not to exceed 30%) of the regular salary to which I may become entitled;
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

2.	
 	

$                   per pay period of the regular salary to which I may become entitled with respect to (check either (a) or (b) below)
:
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

(a)                 all pay periods during the Plan Year

(b)                 the following pay periods (specify):
	



 	

 	



 	

 	



 	

 	





	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	


	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	


	



 	

 	


 Bonus (elect either 3 or 4 for bonus earned in 2005 and possibly payable in 2006)
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

3.	
 	

      % (in even 1% increments not to exceed 50%) of any cash bonuses to which I may become entitled;
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

4.	
 	

$                   of any cash bonuses to which I may become entitled.





NOTE: The Company has taken measures to design the Plan in a manner that conforms to current tax law. However, it is possible
that new legislation could affect your 2005 Plan Year deferral elections. Your 2005 Plan Year deferral elections are irrevocable, and such deferral elections are governed by the terms and conditions
of the Plan; however, in order to comply with federal legislation, the Company may modify the Plan or implement a new plan for 2005. Your selections will be subject to any such modifications or such
new Plan. The Committee may reduce the amount you have elected to defer above, or such deferral elections may be rendered null and void if necessary to comply with federal income tax law (including
applicable regulations) regarding nonqualified deferred compensation plans. 


ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED: 


I
hereby authorize the above amounts to be deducted and deferred through payroll deduction/reduction by the Company. 



	
 Participant's Signature	 	
 Date
	
«First Name» «Last Name»
 Participant's Name	
 	
«Emplid»
 Participant's Employee ID Number













QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.02
DLA provides range of services to support the warfighter
 
  By Kevin Walston, US Forces – Afghanistan Public Affairs
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                               ABERCROMBIE & FITCH

                                   STOCK AWARD
                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT

This Stock Option Agreement is entered into by and between Abercrombie & Fitch
(the "Company"), and the associate of the Company whose name appears below (the
"Associate") in order to set forth the terms and conditions of Options granted
to the Associate under The Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Option Plan for
Associates (The "Plan").

         ASSOCIATE'S NAME:

         SOCIAL SECURITY #:

         ADDRESS:

         # OPTIONS:

         DATE OF GRANT:

         GRANT PRICE:

         OPTION TYPE:

         VESTING:             Shares vest over four years
                              25% / 25% / 25% / 25%

Subject to the attached Terms and Conditions and the terms of the Plan, which
are incorporated herein by reference, the Company hereby grants to the Associate
Options to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company, as outlined above.

The Company and the Associate have executed this Agreement as of the Date of
Grant set forth above.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH                        ASSOCIATE

_____________________________________      _____________________________________
Michael Jeffries, Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer
No. 10-6814.

#### Mark Jordan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1037, 131 S. Ct. 579,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8722.

178 L. Ed. 2d 428,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 758.
# DLA celebrates with open house at Fort Bragg facility

/ Published Sept. 16, 2016

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Customer Operations Directorate’s Mapping Division will host an open house Sept. 28 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the U.S. Army Forces Command Intelligence Readiness and Operations Center on Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  

The FIROC, which opened Aug. 1, is a full-service facility offering pre-positioned hardcopy and digital retail products in support of training, planning, and deployments, as well as unique aviation products supporting these missions. Counter service will be available to customers on Fort Bragg and in the surrounding area for all products and specialized items including those that can be printed on-site, on demand at the FIROC.

During the open house, customers will be able to tour the new forward-positioned map facility and have the opportunity to meet DLA team members who will provide a single point-of-access for mapping logistical support.  In addition to ordering assistance and fulfillment, team members will provide training for establishing and maintaining customer accounts, help customers learn how to use the DLA Map Catalog for ordering products, become familiar with DoD EMALL and Web Requisitioning (WEBREQ), understand how to establish requirements, and many other topics tailored to a customer’s specific needs. 

Light refreshments will be served.
No. D-2576.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of James Alan Malkus.

562 U.S. 1039, 131 S. Ct. 628,

178 L. Ed. 2d 457,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9023.

November 15, 2010.

James Alan Mal-kus, of San Diego, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10-416.

#### Jesse Jay Montejo, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

562 U.S. 1082, 131 S. Ct. 656,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9104.

178 L. Ed. 2d 513,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 40 So. 3d 952.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PAROLE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) 
[5 U.S.C. Section 552b].

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, June 30, 1998.

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Boulevard, Suite 400, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20815.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open 
Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of minutes of previous Commission meeting.
    2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Legal, Chief of Staff, 
Case Operations, and Administrative Sections.
    3. Consideration of Proposed Interim Regulations and Guidelines for 
District of Columbia prisoners to take effect August 5, 1998.

AGENCY CONTACT: Tom Kowalski, Case Operations, United States Parole 
Commission, (301) 492-5962.

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
Michael A. Stover,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-17208 Filed 6-24-98; 9:58 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.4  


 
  SECOND AMENDMENT
  TO
  TYCO INTERNATIONAL (US) INC.
  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN    
    


A.    The
Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of April 1, 1999, and as amended by the First Amendment thereto, is
hereby further amended by deleting Sections 5(a) and (b) thereof and inserting therefor the following: 


        "5.
Vesting.


        (a)   A
Participant shall become fully vested in the full value of the amount credited to his or her Account upon attainment of age 55, death, Disability, completion of at
least five Years of Service (three Years of Service for any Participant with an Hour of Service on or after January 1, 2002) or a Change in Control. 


        (b)   A
Participant whose employment with the Company or any Affiliated Entity terminates prior to attainment of age 55 (for any reason other than death or Disability) with
fewer than the number of Years of Service required to be vested pursuant to (a) above will forfeit all amounts in his or her Account upon his or her termination of employment." 


B.    The
effective date of this amendment is January 1, 2002. 


C.    Except
as amended herein, the Plan is hereby confirmed in all other respects. 


        IN
WITNESS THEREFORE, this document has been signed on behalf of the Retirement Committee by its duly authorized representative this 14th day of February, 2002. 



	 
	 	 
	 	 

	 	 	TYCO INTERNATIONAL (US) INC.

RETIREMENT COMMITTEE
	 	 	By:	 	/s/  ROBERT A. BENT      
	 	 	 	 	
 Robert A. Bent

Clerk, Retirement Committee













QuickLinks


SECOND AMENDMENT TO TYCO INTERNATIONAL (US) INC. SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
# C_2013101EN.01001902.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/19

---

Action brought on 16 January 2013 — Senz Technologies/OHIM — Impliva (Umbrellas)

(Case T-23/13)

2013/C 101/42

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Senz Technologies BV (Delft, Netherlands) (represented by: W. Hoyng and C. Zeri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Impliva BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dated 26 September 2012 in Case R 2459/2010-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dated 26 September 2012 in Case R 2459/2010-3;

| — | Uphold the arguments put forward before the General Court and declare the registration of the Registered Community Design with no. 000579032-0002 to be valid; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the arguments put forward before the General Court and declare the registration of the Registered Community Design with no. 000579032-0002 to be valid;

| — | Order the Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The trade design ‘Umbrellas’ — Registered Community design No 000579032-0002

Registered Community trade design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design: Impliva BV

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade design:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The application for a declaration of invalidity was based on Articles 4 and 9 Council Regulation No 6/2002

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1) and Articles 6 in connection with 25 (1)(b) of Council Regulation No 6/2002.

Pleas in law:

---