alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013207EN.01006001.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/60

---

Action brought on 29 April 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-39/13)

2013/C 207/102

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision fixing the applicant’s accredited pension rights acquired before entry into service at the Commission on the basis of the new General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 (‘the GIP’) and the decision rejecting the complaint.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejections her complaint of 24 January 2013 relating to the application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force at the time of her application for transfer of her pension rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejections her complaint of 24 January 2013 relating to the application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force at the time of her application for transfer of her pension rights;

| — | annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Settlement of Individual Entitlements of 11 July 2012, applying the actuarial values resulting from the new GIP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Settlement of Individual Entitlements of 11 July 2012, applying the actuarial values resulting from the new GIP;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
# Medical supply chain works face-to-face with Pacific customers

/ Published June 2, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Being able to meet with customers in person allows a better flow of communication, a Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Medical supply chain division chief said about a visit last month to customers in the Pacific region.

Splichal, along with Lorinda Ferraiolo, a Medical contracting officer, visited pharmaceutical customers in Japan, Korea, Guam and Hawaii between April 30 and May 14.

During the two-week period, the team trained Army, Air Force and Navy personnel on ordering systems, such as the Defense Medical Logistics enterprise, Trading Partners and the Medical Materiel Catalog. 

“I love face-to-face customer service,” Ferraiolo said. “We strive to help the customers make their job easier so they can do what they have to do.”  

One of the challenges for customers was not getting their order in a timely fashion, Splichal said. This can be due to missing information on labels or a misunderstanding by the vendor.  

“In the past few months, we’ve had some materiel that’s become frustrated, meaning there is an issue, not with the materiel itself, but with the paperwork that goes along with it,” he said. “I was able to provide hands-on training to ensure the soldiers, airmen and seamen, who are on the ground, understood the requirements that are needed for every order.”

The ultimate goal was to let the customers know DLA is their support system, Ferraiolo said. 

“We wanted them to know that we are here for them,” she said. “They are our customers and we are here to assist in any way we can.”  

Splichal echoed that sentiment and said that he often checks his work email at odd hours of the night to help customers in the Pacific.  

“I just reinforced that if they have an issue or a problem, they can contact us,” he said. “Most of our customers are on a 12-to--14 hour time difference and that can cause a delay if there is an issue. If I check my email at 11 o’clock at night and there is an issue, if I can’t fix it right then, I know what I need to do first thing in the morning.”

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Brenden Le, head of the U.S. Naval Hospital Guam pharmacy department, appreciated having the Medical team out there for support.

“It was great to finally meet the faces of the folks we almost exclusively correspond with via email,” Le said. “We were looking forward to their visit to [Pacific Command], as the challenges we face out here are difficult to put into words. [Email] just doesn’t give the full picture where we’re trying to explain all the hoops we’re jumping through to maintain an adequate supply of medications to support our hospital and its mission.”

Le said the visit reassured him of the support he receives from the Medical team.

“It’s nice to know that we have not been abandoned or forgotten,” he said. “It sounds cliché but ‘out of sight, out of mind.’ It’s renewed our faith that we’re not fighting these problems alone.”
EXHIBIT 10.24 - ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Addendum (the "Addendum") is made effective as of the 12th day  of
December,  2001 and is intended  to amend a certain  Employment  Agreement  (the
"Agreement")  by and  between  Erie  Indemnity  Company  and  Jeffrey A.  Ludrof
effective as of June 30, 1999.

         WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest  of
the Company  and its  Shareholders  to secure the  continued  employment  of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company  has   previously
considered  and agreed to extend  the term of the  Agreement  from its  original
term; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company at its meeting of
December  11, 2001 has again  agreed to extend the term of the  Agreement  for a
period of one (1) additional year as contained herein; and

         WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree
         as follows:

          1.  Paragraph 1 of the  Agreement  with  respect to the Term is hereby
          amended by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2003.

          2. All other  terms and  conditions  of the  Agreement  remain in full
          force and effect.


ATTEST:                                 ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


/s/  Jan R. Van Gorder                  By: /s/  F. William Hirt
     Jan R. Van Gorder                           F. William Hirt
     Secretary                                   Chairman of the Board


WITNESS:

/s/  Sheila M. Hirsch                       /s/  Jeffrey A. Ludrof
     Sheila M. Hirsch                            Jeffrey A. Ludrof
     Executive Secretary                         170 Gateway Drive
                                                 Fairview, PA   16415


                                       39
No. 10-697.

#### Eduardo Pabon-Mandrell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1140, 131 S. Ct. 960,

178 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 83.

January 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

*757Same case below, 617 F.3d 581.
Exhibit 10.38

Escalade, Incorporated
Schedule of Director Compensation

Each
non-employee director of Escalade, Incorporated currently is entitled to
receive an annual cash retainer of $25,000 with the exception of the Chairman
of the Board, who is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000.
Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual
fee of $5,000 except for the Audit Committee Chairman who is entitled to
receive $15,000. Each member of the Compensation Committee is entitled to
receive an additional annual fee of $3,000 except for the Compensation
Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $10,000. All Directors are
entitled to receive an additional fee of $1,000 per board meeting attended in
excess of eight meetings per year. Members of the Audit Committee and
Compensation Committee receive additional fees of $1,000 per committee meeting
attended in excess of six and four meetings respectively. Each non-employee
board member receives restricted stock units (RSU) annually and in 2008 this
award amounted to 1,250 RSUs per director. In 2009, the non-employee members
of the board have all volunteered to take a 10% reduction in all fees in which
they are entitled to receive.

Under the
terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, Directors can elect to
receive some or all of the fees earned in shares of the Companys common stock
or in the form of RSUs which vest after one year. In 2008, there were 2,568
shares issued and 21,153 RSUs issued pursuant to the plan. In 2008, directors
Baalmann, Williams and White opted to receive 100% of the fees they were
entitled to in the form of RSUs. Directors Griffin, Matthews and Savitsky
received their fees in cash.

---
I didn’t think

I smoked that

much either.

Christine, age 55, Pennsylvania 

Diagnosed with cancer at age 44

Christine ate healthy foods. She exercised. 

She felt healthy. So she didn’t think 

the amount she smoked would hurt her. But, 

at 44, she was diagnosed with oral cancer. 

And it came back twice. Now she has no 

teeth and only half of her jaw.

You can quit smoking. 

For free help, call

1-800-QUIT-NOW.

Christine, age 39

#CDCTips

Print Only Document
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.61 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.61 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.61 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.61 MB)
 
 2022 National Police Week DSCC Police Week
 Photo Gallery
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Letter Agreement dated July 14, 2004



 
















Exhibit 10.2









July 14, 2004




VIA REGULAR MAIL 




Mr. Gregory J. Eisenhauer

525 Ebley Place

Alpharetta, GA 30022



     Re: Compensation Arrangements



Dear Gregg:




     I am pleased to advise you that in recognition and consideration of your service to the
ProxyMed, Inc. (the “Company”) the Board of Directors of the Company has approved several
amendments to your current compensation plan. This letter will confirm our agreement to amend your
current arrangements as discussed herein.



     1. Bonus Pool Participation. You have been granted participation in an existing
bonus pool payable in the event of a change of ownership of ProxyMed, Inc. This bonus will be
payable in cash or stock, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, upon a merger or buyout of
the Company. For purposes of your entitlement to this bonus, an eligible change in ownership means
no less than 50.1% of the common shares of ProxyMed, Inc. must change hands to a single party.



     Your bonus amount will be based upon your annual salary as of 2003, plus an estimation of your
annual maximum management bonus (based on your most recent annual bonus) up to a target bonus
potential of $250,000, and will be paid according to the attached schedule over a range of
effective buyout/merger prices. You must be an active employee, and not subject to any severance
agreement, in order to receive this bonus. You should be aware that in almost all situations, this
bonus will be fully taxable. Certain elections are available to limit the amount of tax in those
cases where the bonus is to be paid in stock.



 






 



     2. Stock Options. You will be granted 18,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s
common stock at its fair market value defined as the price at which common stock is reported to
have traded on the NASDAQ System at the close of business on the date of the grant. The stock
option agreement will have a ten (10) year term. The options will vest over a four (4) year period
as follows: 4,500 on the first anniversary of the agreement; 4,500 on the second anniversary of the
agreement, 4,500 on the third anniversary of the Agreement, and 4,500 on the day before the fourth
anniversary of the Agreement. These stock options will be subject to certain limitations,
obligations and conditions set forth in the agreement.


Attached is a new Stock Option Agreement. Kindly acknowledge your agreement and acceptance of
these arrangements by executing below, and on the indicated pages of the attached agreement, and
return one fully executed original of each of these documents to me. The arrangements discussed in
this letter and the attachments will not be effective until we have received your signatures.



Very truly yours,




PROXYMED, INC.




/s/ David Oles



David Edward Oles

Vice President & Secretary



Accepted and Agreed as stated above:




/s/ Gregory J. Eisenhauer



Gregory J. Eisenhauer



Attachments



		
	cc: 	Michael K. Hoover

Nancy J. Ham
# C_2017144EN.01006004.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/60

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — T & L Sugars and Sidul Açúcares v Commission

(Case T-411/13) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/84)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
# C_2013147EN.01002601.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/26

---

Action brought on 15 March 2013 — Sun Capital Partners/OHIM — Sun Capital Partners (SUN CAPITAL)

(Case T-164/13)

2013/C 147/47

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sun Capital Partners, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: P.-A. Dubois, Solicitor, D. Alexander, QC and F. Clark, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sun Capital Partners Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Board; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Board; and/or

| — | Remit the matter for further consideration by the Board; |
| --- | --- |

—

Remit the matter for further consideration by the Board;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board;

| — | Order SCPL to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board, in the event that SCLP becomes an intervening party in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order SCPL to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board, in the event that SCLP becomes an intervening party in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘SUN CAPITAL’– Community trade mark registration No 2 942 654

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds of the request for a declaration of invalidity were those laid down in Articles 53(1)(c) and 8(4) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 53(1) in conjunction with 8(4) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN W. BROTHERTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D16-4463 DEPT. OF REVENUE, O/B/O WINEEN ) ANN BROTHERTON, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas M. Ramsberger, Judge. Laura A. Olson of The Law Office of Laura A. Olson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Carrie R. McNair, Assistant Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Tallahassee (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI JJ., Concur.
# C_2013352EN.01000302.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 9 September 2013 — Sysmex Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

(Case C-480/13)

2013/C 352/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sysmex Europe GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should a product have been classified, in 2005, under heading 3212 of the Combined Nomenclature (1) as a dye or colouring matter where it is composed of solvents and of a polymethine substance which can have a certain colouring effect — which, on textiles at least, is not permanent — but which, in the case of the product to be classified, serves to obtain information on particles (white blood cells) contained in a test solution (pre-treated blood) by means of a process in which, through the deposition of ions in defined components of the particles (nucleic acids), the substance forms molecular structures which, when exposed to laser light on a certain wavelength, become fluorochromatic for a limited period and this state and its extent are measured with the aid of a special photoelectric cell?

1

---

(1)  The Combined Nomenclature in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2004 L 327, p. 1).

1

---
No. 10-7195.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1129, 131 S. Ct. 925,

178 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 39.

January 10, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2013156EN.01005203.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/52

---

Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-100/12, Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-205/13 P)

2013/C 156/97

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal;

| — | Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those set out in Case T-203/13 P Marcuccio v Commission.

Marcuccio

Commission

---