alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                         AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18
U.S.C. Sections 1350 (a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

     1.   Stuart Grayston is the President of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd.

     2.   The Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2002, accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the
          "Exchange Act"), and

     3.   The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2002

                                                        By: /s/Stuart Grayston
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Stuart Grayston
                                                        President
**Exhibit 10.20**

**Directors’ Compensation**

Directors who are employees of Duquesne Light Holdings or any of our affiliates are notcompensated for their Board service to Holdings, Duquesne Light or any other affiliate. 

Directors who are not employees are compensatedfor their Board service by a combination of cash and an annual grant of Common Stock. Effective May 25, 2006, the cash component consists of an annual Board retainer of $30,000, payable in twelve monthly installments, and a fee of $1,500 foreach Board, Committee or ad hoc meeting attended. The Audit Committee Chair is paid an additional annual retainer of $3,000. The Board Chair is not compensated for attending Committee meetings. The stock component consists of an annual grant of2,500 restricted shares or deferred stock units (which vest over two years) for each Director, plus annual grants of stock (which may be deferred in the form of deferred stock units at the recipient’s option) in the following amounts: $30,000to the Board Chair; $15,000 to the Vice Chair; and $5,000 to each Committee chairperson. Prior to May 25, 2006, the annual retainer was $24,000, the meeting fee was $1,000 and the Audit Committee Chair did not receive an additional retainer;the other compensation components were not changed. 

For Directors elected prior to June 1, 2003, we have a Charitable Giving Programfunded by company-owned life insurance policies on the Directors. Upon the death of a Director, we donate up to $500,000, payable in ten equal annual installments, to a maximum of ten qualifying charitable or educational organizations recommended bythe Director and reviewed and approved by the Employment and Community Relations Committee and the Board. A Director must have Board service of 60 months or more in order to qualify for the full donation amount, with service of less than 60 monthsqualifying for a pro-rated donation. The program does not result in any material cost to us. 

We provide Business Travel Insurance to ournon-employee directors as part of our Business Travel Insurance Plan for Management Employees. In the event of accidental death or dismemberment, benefits of up to $400,000 per individual are provided. The program does not result in any materialcost to us. 

Directors can participate in the Duquesne Light Company College Matching Gift Program, which provides a dollar-for-dollarmatch of a gift of cash or securities (up to a maximum of $5,000 per donor per calendar year) to an accredited, nonprofit, non-proprietary, degree-granting college, university, or junior college located within the United States or one of itspossessions which is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. The program does not result in any material cost to us.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for
the period ending July 1, 2000 for Grove Holdings LLC and subsidiaries, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                     745
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          135,713
<ALLOWANCES>                            (8,597)
<INVENTORY>                            228,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       371,072
<PP&E>                                 247,583
<DEPRECIATION>                         (67,554)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         826,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  219,972
<BONDS>                                289,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               3,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           826,457
<SALES>                                606,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       606,684
<CGS>                                  503,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          503,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        93,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      37,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (29,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (33,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                  302
<NET-INCOME>                           (32,780)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0



</TABLE>
No. 10-6020.

#### In re Harold Ven-Noy Davis, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1001, 131 S. Ct. 510,

178 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8354.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**     The following certification accompanies Dynamics ResearchCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the yearended December 31, 2004 and is not filed as provided in Item601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and ExchangeCommission.Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of DynamicsResearch Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the‘Company’), for the year ended December 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the ‘Report’), the undersigned, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:          (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended    (the ‘Exchange Act’), fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ David Keleher       David Keleher *Senior Vice President and Chief* *Financial Officer*March 31, 2005
#### Reed v. W.C.A.B. (Allied Signal, Inc.)

12/16/2015

427 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 114 A.3d 464
# Army, DLA officials plan way ahead for equipment reductions, sustained readiness 

/ Published March 11, 2016
The Pentagon, Virginia,
No. 10-6146.

#### Desmond Lamont Garrett, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 945, 131 S. Ct. 370,

178 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7814.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 279.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1188 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-46-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell) Model 204B, 205A, 205A-1, 205B, and 212 

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 15 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: Expand the applicability of four existing ADs to include PMA by identicality to prevent 

cracking/failure of certain yokes and loss of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $40,157

Labor per Helicopter

(3 x $85/work-hour for 

records review)

(35 x $85/work-hour for 

inspection)

(32 x $85/work-hour for 

replacement)

$255 (records review)

$2,975 (inspection)

$2,720 (replacement)

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $48,450 

Total US Fleet Cost $643,155

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Kohner
#### Com. v. Delacruz

10/27/2015

371 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 450
# Consider it done: DLA scraps aging train cars for Army

/ Published Jan. 20, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Members of the agency’s workforce in Korea recently provided key property disposal support to the U.S. Army battalion responsible for moving warfighters and equipment to exercises and installations across the Korean peninsula. 

                Rail car components wait to be scrapped at the DLA Disposition Services Gimcheon property disposal site in South Korea in late 2022.                            221128-D-D0441-4321                            Rail car components wait to be scrapped at the DLA Disposition Services Gimcheon property disposal site in South Korea in late 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA photoVIRIN: 221128-D-D0441-4321The Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services team at Gimcheon – including Disposal Support Representative Ki Song Chong and property receivers Wok Sok Chang and Pyong Chol Yi – brought in a 100-ton crane to help rid the 25th Transportation Battalion of 20 railcars weighing an estimated 1.6 million pounds to be sold as scrap. 

The work was conducted on site in Gimcheon over a four-day period, said Area Manager Chris Dunsmore. He said the local team previously processed 20 railcars in early 2021 and expects to receive another batch sometime in the next few months. 

Originally worth an estimated $8 million, the railcars had reached the end of their 30-year service life. The Army disassembled the wheels from the beds prior to the turn in. 

The transportation battalion falls under the U.S. Army Materiel Support Center – Korea and has historically supported the 25th Infantry, with ties to the peninsula stretching back to the Korean War. The battalion coordinates and inspects the Army’s various rail loads and works with the Korean National Railroad for movement authority.

How central is the rail movement mission to warfighting capability in Korea? The battalion’s crest features railroad tracks headed right down the logo’s center and is inscribed with the motto “Consider it done.”
No. 10-6364.

#### Omar Villarreal, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 493,

178 L. Ed. 2d 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7918.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 580.
#### Com. v. Mays

08/17/2016

193 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 785
:aq_lplan 

### Name ofcontact, owner, facility, etc: !Infrastructure SIP 2010 N02 1-hrStandard 

### Description of notice: Certification that 80 Is implementing the 2010 N02 1-hr Standard

191 

### Date to poston website: Date comment period ends: iS/2312013 !9/23/2013 

### City, county or geographic location: !statewide

Note: Rule proceedings remain on the website until the rules go into effect. Therefore, choose a "Date no longer on website" beyond when the rules become effective, laterthe date can be edited to reflectthe effective date ofthe rules. 

### Date no longeron website: 912412013 

### Linkto public notice: ihttp://denr.sd.gov/des/aq/aqnews/Finall SIP 1hr N02 8 2013 SD.pdf
# C_2016222EN.01004701.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/47

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 April 2016 — Drewes-Wran v Commission

(Case F-84/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/66)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9/11/2013, p. 52.

---
# C_2014395EN.01004302.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — B&S Europe v Commission

(Case T-222/13) (1)

((Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Union external aid - Rejection of the application - Selection criteria - Contracts divided into tranches - Reference project - Duty to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Legitimate expectations - Principle of impartiality - Audi alteram partem rule))

(2014/C 395/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Business and Strategies in Europe (B&S Europe) SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Bihain and S. Pâques, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Bordes and R. Tricot, and subsequently by R. Tricot, acting as Agents, assisted by A.-M. Vandromme and J. Stuyck, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision, set out in its letters of 15 February and 2 April 2013, informing the applicant that it had not been included on the list of candidates invited to participate in the restricted call for tenders concerning lot 7 of the multiple framework contract for the provision of short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Union external aid (OJ 2012/S 105-174077).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Business and Strategies in Europe (B&S Europe) SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Business and Strategies in Europe (B&S Europe) SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 164 of 8.6.2014.

---
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Harry Roessner, Vice President and Controller of SunCom Wireless,Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2006
163 A.3d 871

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALEXANDER J. GUREVICH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 040041988)

June 29, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-070, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14, ALEXANDER J. GUREVICH of GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period eighteen months based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of *RPC*1.8(a)(1) and (3)(improp-er business transaction with client), *RPC*8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and *RPC*8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALEXANDER J. GUREVICH is suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months, effective July 31, 2017, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(d); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

*514ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
# C_2013101EN.01002102.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/21

---

Action brought on 4 February 2013 — Efag Trade Mark Company v OHIM (FICKEN)

(Case T-52/13)

2013/C 101/46

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG (Schemmerhofen, Germany) (represented by M. Wekwerth, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 October 2012 in Case R 493/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 October 2012 in Case R 493/2012-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs including those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘FICKEN’ for goods and services in Classes 25, 32, 33 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 274 366

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Theundersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NIC Inc.(the “Company) each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:November 6, 2008

 
| /s/  Harry H. Herington  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Harry  H. Herington      |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/  Stephen M. Kovzan   |   |
| Stephen  M. Kovzan       |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 8.1
 ANOORAQ RESOURCES CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS AT JUNE 30, 2010
 Name
    
    Country of Incorporation
    
    Proportion of ownership interestN1C Resources Incorporation
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100
    %Anooraq Minera Mexicana
    
    Mexico
    
    
    100
    %N2C Resources Incorporation *
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100
    %Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    100
    %Bokoni Holdings Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %Bokoni Mines Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %Boikgantsho Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %Kwanda Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %Ga-Phasha Proprietary Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %Lebowa Platinum Mine Limited *
    
    South Africa
    
    
    51
    %
 
 *
    
    Indirectly held