alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# D Lunch and Learn turns focus on resiliency

/ Published May 25, 2022

Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Deputy Commander Kenneth Watson spoke on re-entry and resiliency during a directorate culture council event May 12 at the Defense Supply Center Columbus. Watson offered resiliency strategies and examples from his own experiences in managing work/life balance. The Land and Maritime workforce began re-entry to the workplace May 9. Event organizer and D Culture Council President Shari Murnahan narrated the event, which also featured Employee Assistance Program Manager Drew Henderson. Henderson’s presentation included tips and techniques for employees on adjusting to transitions and managing stress to achieve positive outcomes.
# C_2016392EN.01002201.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Ferraci v Commission

(Case T-219/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Municipal real estate tax - Exemption granted to non-commercial entities carrying out specific activities - Codified law on income tax - Exemption from the one-off municipal tax - Decision in part finding no State aid and in part declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Whether directly concerned - Admissibility - Absolute impossibility of recovering the aid - Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 392/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pietro Ferraci (San Cesareo, Italy) (represented initially by: A. Nucara and E. Gambaro, and subsequently by E. Gambaro, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, and subsequently by G. Conte, D. Grespan and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri and G. De Bellis, acting as Agents

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/284/EU of 19 December 2012 on State aid SA.20829 (C 26/2010, ex NN 43/2010 (ex CP 71/2006)); Scheme concerning the municipal real estate tax exemption granted to real estate used by non-commercial entities for specific purposes implemented by Italy (JO 2013 L 166, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Pietro Ferracci to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Pietro Ferracci to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs relating to its intervention. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs relating to its intervention.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.

1

---
UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY REGION 6

Honorable Gary Johnson Governor of New Mexico Santa Fe, NM 87503

Dear Governor Johnson: 1445ROSSAVENUE, SUITE 1200 DALLAS,TX 75202-2733



## ·JUN 

# 161999

On November 6, 1998, you submitted formatting revisions to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions**.L.:.!.·::lu~J.e** t:1.YL"·:**t:ct.tor~s** t.;.J 20 Ne:w**H~x.i.co** Administrative Code (NMAC) 2.70- Operating Permits and 20 NMAC 2.72- construction Permits.

On October 9, 1998, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) presented the corrections to the Environmental Improvement Board for adoption, and the corrections became effective on November 14, 1998. The submittal also includes other supporting documents which are necessary for processing and approving this SIP submittal.

We have reviewed the submission in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's policy for determining completeness of SIP submittals, and have determined that the submittal is administratively complete. We will be reviewing this revision for approval and will publish the appropriate action in the Federal Register. The NMED will be informed of our progress during this process.
In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) submitted an April 7, 1999, letter concerning vour intentions of 'l'C.ble C, which was a correction to 20 NMAC 2.72

- Construction Permits. According to your November 6 letter, the table was inadvertently left out during reformatting from the Air Quality Control Regulations into the NMAC format. The EPA does not consider the table as part of the current SIP, and intends to take no action on that portion of the November 6, 1998, submittal.
If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, 

### IS!Jerry

### Clifford Gregg A. Cooke Regional Administrator InternetAddress(URL) • hltp:/AYWw.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable•PrlrlledwHhVegetable011Based InksonRecycled Paper(Minimum25%Postconsumer)
Transportation supervisor course goes virtual
 
  By Carrie E. Rodgers, DLA Human Resources, Distribution & Materiel Logistics Training Division
  As Defense Logistics Agency’s largest major subordinate command, DLA Distribution’s global footprint requires the organization to continuously deliver world-class training and support to customers and employees. The need to evaluate and improve training is constant, especially in critical areas and the distribution and materiel logistics training division, or DTD, is always prepared. In mid-September 2021, the DTD Division Chief, Ronda Urey, received an urgent request from DLA Distribution’s Organization Management Deputy Director, Polly Charbonneau to revamp the functional transportation course for supervisors within an incredibly short timeframe — two weeks. Urey turned to her Transportation Course Manager, Carroll (J.R.) Brooks. Brooks analyzed the course overview and expertly redesigned a 40-hour basic transportation in-person course into a 16-hour virtual course with a supervisor perspective focus. The revised training provides new supervisors with refresher training on core transportation concepts, introducing or reinforcing transportation processes and embedding more complex supervisor-specific procedures, rebuilding knowledge gaps to promote workplace productivity. Brooks also used real world examples on how to apply important transportation concepts from a supervisor’s perspective. Between the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021 and first quarter of fiscal year 2022, Brooks delivered three virtual 16-hr classes, meeting for half a day for four days. This setup allowed supervisors to balance supervisory functions with vital training. During the training, Charbonneau briefly met with the class each morning to gage training effectiveness and answer questions. Student feedback remained positive. They applauded the supervisor focused, pared down training, and Brook’s professionalism and depth of knowledge. “This approach, a focus on supervisors and small bite virtual training, was exactly what DLA Distribution needed,” said Charbonneau. DTD provided just-in-time training geared toward a targeted audience, improving overall knowledge and skills, while creating more confident supervisors.
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.5.2




---



##### 



RECITALS
    AGREEMENT
  Section 1
 Amortization Commencement Date provided however
 Section 2
 Commitment Period
 Section 3
 Final Principal Amount
 1




---



##### 



Section 4
 Maturity Date
 Section 5
 Section 2.3(e) Final Principal Amount
 th
 Section 2.2(d)
 Section 6 provided however
 Section 7
 Section 8
 Section 9
 [Signatures Pages Follow]
 2




---



##### 



CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
as Lender
    
    DENALI SPECTRUM LICENSE, LLC,
as BorrowerBy:
    
    /s/ Robert J. Irving, Jr.
    
    By
    
    Denali Spectrum, LLCName:
    
    Robert J. Irving, Jr.
    
    
    
    Its sole memberTitle:
    
    Senior Vice PresidentBy
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLCIts ManagerBy
    
    Doyon, Limited,
Its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. OsbornName:
    
    Daniel S. OsbornTitle:
    
    Assistant TreasurerDENALI SPECTRUM, LLC,as GuarantorBy
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLC
Its ManagerBy
    
    Doyon, Limited,
Its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. OsbornName:
    
    Daniel S. OsbornTitle:
    
    Assistant Treasurer
 3




---



##### 



DENALI SPECTRUM OPERATIONS, LLC,
as Guarantor
    
    DENALI SPECTRUM LICENSE SUB, LLC,
as GuarantorBy
    
    Denali Spectrum License, LLC,
Its sole member
    
    By
    
    Denali Spectrum License, LLC,
Its sole memberBy
    
    Denali Spectrum, LLC,
Its sole member
    
    By
    
    Denali Spectrum, LLC,
Its sole memberBy
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLC,
Its Manager
    
    By
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLC,
Its ManagerBy
    
    Doyon, Limited,
Its Manager
    
    By
    
    Doyon, Limited,
Its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. Osborn
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. OsbornName:
    
    Daniel S. Osborn
    
    Name:
    
    Daniel S. OsbornTitle:
    
    Assistant Treasurer
    
    Title:
    
    Assistant Treasurer
 4
No. 10-5121.

#### Genaro Campos, Petitioner v. James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1103, 131 S. Ct. 814,

178 L. Ed. 2d 548,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9546.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 244, 178 L. Ed. 2d 163, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6429.
No. 10-5124.

#### David Eugene Johnston, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 459,

178 L. Ed. 2d 292,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7932.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 27 So. 3d 11.
# Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month

/ Published April 11, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution joins the Defense Department in recognizing April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. This year’s theme, “Step Forward. Prevent. Report. Advocate,” is a call to action to ensure a safer work environment for the valued DLA workforce.

“The focus of this year’s SAAPM campaign is to challenge each individual to use their personal strength to advance positive change within our community. If you witness inappropriate behaviors, speak out and report it. Being a passive bystander is never ok,” Majeeda Gathers, DLA Distribution sexual assault response coordinator, said.

                Employees are encouraged to wear teal on Tuesdays as part of a recognizable effort to raise awareness about the prevention of sexual assault.                            Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month                            Employees are encouraged to wear teal on Tuesdays as part of a recognizable effort to raise awareness about the prevention of sexual assault.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Public AffairsVIRIN: 230410-D-D0441-0001

To provide resources to employees, Gathers set up an information table at DLA Distribution Headquarters in New Cumberland April 3 and just outside the Eastern Distribution Center April 4. Wearing teal, the color of sexual assault, awareness, prevention and support, Gathers passed out educational brochures, pens, magnets and other promotional items adorned with the SAPR hotline number to help increase awareness.DLA Distribution is also promoting two awareness events – Teal Tuesdays and Denim Day. Throughout the month of April, DLA employees are encouraged to wear teal every Tuesday to help raise awareness for SAAPM. On April 26th, DLA employees are encouraged to wear denim for National Denim Day, a day set aside to help bring awareness to victim blaming and assert there is never an excuse for rape.DLA established the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program in 2016 and has made significant strides to promote awareness and institute robust prevention initiatives to cultivate an organizational culture where sexual assault is never tolerated. For more information, DLA Distribution employees can contact Majeeda Gathers at Majeeda.Gathers@dla.mil or call the SAPR hotline at 800-841-0937.
# C_2014015EN.01001002.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2013 — Thomas Etzold and Others v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-575/13)

2014/C 15/15

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Thomas Etzold, Sandra Etzold, Toni Lennard Etzold

Applicants:

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight?

1

| 2. | If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay?

| 3. | Are adverse actions by third parties acting on their own responsibility and to whom certain tasks that constitute part of the operation of an air carrier have been entrusted, to be deemed to be extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Are adverse actions by third parties acting on their own responsibility and to whom certain tasks that constitute part of the operation of an air carrier have been entrusted, to be deemed to be extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004?

| 4. | If the answer to Question 3 is in the affirmative, does the assessment of the situation depend on who (airline, airport operator etc.) entrusted the task(s) to the third party? |
| --- | --- |

4.

If the answer to Question 3 is in the affirmative, does the assessment of the situation depend on who (airline, airport operator etc.) entrusted the task(s) to the third party?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ L 46, 17.2.2004, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) of our report dated March 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd. as of
December 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the year
ended December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd.



|    |  |                                    
|--- |  | -----------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Somekh Chaikin                 
|    |  | Somekh Chaikin                     
|    |  | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|    |  | A member firm of KPMG International

Tel-Aviv, Israel,

March 12, 2009
# FORMATS

||
||
# Associates Attend Annual Automated One-Time Buy Training Session

/ Published April 5, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, The Automated One-Time Buy Team at DLA Land and Maritime hosted an in-depth training session in Columbus March 15-17.  Per the Automated Procurement System Internal Control (APSIC) DLA Manual, DLAM 5025.06, published Sept. 30, 2015, Automated Contracting Officers and Small Business Directors or their designated representative must be trained annually to confirm they understand the automated system logic.  Automated Contracting Officers were under this requirement prior to the new DLAM, but this was the first year Small Business directors were also included.Associates from across the agency attended the training on Defense Supply Center Columbus, including: Amy Sajda, DLA Director of Small Business Programs; small business directors from Land and Maritime, Aviation, and Troop Support; and personnel from DLA Aviation, DLA Troop Support, and Land and Maritime.“The training was important because it met the new requirements of APSIC and allowed business process analysts across the agency to receive refresher training on two of the most complex areas of automated system logic and prepare for system testing later this year,” Kelly Penwell, chief of the Automated Systems Team, Land and Maritime, said.Over the course of three days, attendees were presented training topics such as Automated Set-Aside Determination, Evaluation Logic, Automated Foreign Evaluation, APSIC Details, and an Automated Request for Change Overview. In preparation for Automated Request for Change testing scheduled to occur later this year, Procurement Analysts led the attendees in a live session on how to create data and execute programs used in most Automated One-Time Buy system testing.  Ryan Snyder, a member of Land and Maritime’s Small Business office, said it’s important for his team to know how to respond to buyers or vendors at workshops who ask questions about the auto process.“With any automated process, a system has to be programmed how to handle the gray areas, so it's important for my team to understand that computer logic is giving appropriate advantage to the small business community,” Snyder said.Associates who attended said it was also beneficial to network with the attending small business directors, J6 personnel and agency-wide BPAs.
Exhibit 10.53


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTATED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to
Restated Management Agreement dated March 30, 2001 and effective January 1,
2001 by and between UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Company”),
and DANIEL J. JOHNSTON (“Johnston”) (“Restated Management Agreement”)
is entered into this 12th day of November, 2004 (“Effective Date”).


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties
hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             The words “six (6)
months” in the first sentence of Sections 4(f) and in 4(f)(v) of the Restated
Management Agreement are hereby deleted, and the words “ninety (90) days” are
hereby substituted in their place and stead.


 


2.             All other
provisions of the Restated Management Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


3.             The foregoing
amendment shall be effective as of the Effective date.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  UNITED
  INDUSTRIES CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Robert
  L. Caulk

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Robert L. Caulk

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman,
  CEO & President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Daniel
  J. Johnston

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Daniel J.
  Johnston
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-9-2012

Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp Inc

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 11-1743

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp Inc" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 1209.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/1209
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11-1743

_____________

CHARLES MCNAIR; THEODORE AUSTIN; DANIELLE 

DEMETRIOU; 

USHMA DESAI; JULIE DYNKO,

 Appellants,

v.

SYNAPSE GROUP INC.

Appellee.

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 06-cv-5072)

District Judge: Hon. Jose L. Linares

_______________

Argued

January 10, 2012

Before: FUENTES, JORDAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit 

Judges.
2

(Filed March 6, 2012)

_______________

Paul Diamond

1605 John Street - #102

Fort Lee, NJ 07024

Gary S. Graifman [ARGUED]

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman

747 Chestnut Ridge Road - #200

Chestnut Ridge, NY 10977

Michael S. Green

Green & Associates

522 Route 18 - #5

P.O. Box 428

East Brunswick, NJ 08816

 Counsel for Appellants

Geoffrey W. Castello, III

Lauri A. Mazzuchetti

Vincent P. Rao, II

Kelley, Drye & Warren

200 Kimball Drive

Parsippany, NJ 07054

Thomas E. Gilbertsen [ARGUED]

Venable

575 7th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

 Counsel for Appellee

_______________
3

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the above-captioned 

opinion be amended as follows: 

At the bottom of page 2, “Veneble” shall be deleted and 

replaced with “Venable”. 

 /s/ Kent A. Jordan 

Circuit Judge

Dated: March 9, 2012

SLC/cc: Geoffrey W. Castello, III

Thomas E. Gilbersten

Gary S. Graifman

Lauri A. Mazzuchetti
No. 10-156.

#### Gene Scroggy, Warden, Petitioner v. Eugene Gall.

562 U.S. 1082, 131 S. Ct. 642,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9133.

178 L. Ed. 2d 512,

November 29, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 346.